Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1547 Scott Adams： I'll Tell You About the Frightening News Today. Join Me If You Dare

00:00:00.380 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that's ever happened in the history of the universe,

00:00:07.760 metaverse, and every other verse.

00:00:10.480 All of them, best thing.

00:00:12.780 And you are smart enough and sexy enough to be here at the right time.

00:00:18.240 Yeah, and some of you are even prepared.

00:00:20.920 Others, still working on it, still working on it.

00:00:23.460 But if you'd like to crank it up a notch, and I think you do, don't you?

00:00:28.680 Yeah, yeah, why not?

00:00:31.200 Because as I learned in economics class in college,

00:00:35.340 my professor explained the most important thing I've ever heard in my life.

00:00:39.960 It's about money.

00:00:41.320 And I'm going to give you this important lesson,

00:00:44.200 which, in a way, summarizes four years of my college education.

00:00:50.540 It goes like this.

00:00:52.100 When it comes to money, more is better.

00:00:55.060 And when it comes to the simultaneous sip, more is better, too.

00:01:01.140 And all you need for more is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen jug or a glass,

00:01:05.720 a vessel of any kind.

00:01:07.520 No holes in the bottom.

00:01:08.980 No holes.

00:01:10.840 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:11.980 I like coffee.

00:01:13.900 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:01:17.240 the dopamine here today,

00:01:18.420 the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:21.100 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:01:23.820 It's going to happen now.

00:01:25.120 Watch what it does to your antibodies.

00:01:26.800 Watch this.

00:01:27.420 Watch this.

00:01:27.920 Go.

00:01:32.660 Whoa! 0.71

00:01:34.600 Is it my imagination,

00:01:36.060 or am I regrowing hair on the top of my head?

00:01:38.880 I mean, it feels like it.

00:01:40.020 The antibodies are going nuts now.

00:01:41.540 Now, here's a question for you.

00:01:46.080 Does my repeated reference to the improvement in your antibodies

00:01:51.240 actually cause anybody's antibodies to improve?

00:01:55.700 What do you think?

00:01:57.960 I've taught you much about persuasion and about the human body.

00:02:02.480 Speculate, if you will.

00:02:04.420 The fact that you come here, and we have some connection because you're here,

00:02:07.840 do you think they're reminding you that the simultaneous sip will improve your antibodies?

00:02:14.480 Do you think it will increase them?

00:02:17.840 I think so.

00:02:19.640 You know, your mileage might vary, but I think so.

00:02:24.120 All right, I just saw this post.

00:02:26.420 I think this was on Instagram, but originally on Twitter.

00:02:29.000 Somebody put it on Instagram.

00:02:30.740 By Neil Brennan.

00:02:31.860 I think this is the tweet that sums up everything for the last six years in one tweet.

00:02:41.580 Are you ready?

00:02:42.260 Remember, it's Halloween.

00:02:44.040 And he tweets,

00:02:45.180 Somewhere, a white person is planning a costume for tonight that's going to F up their whole future. 0.53

00:02:51.260 No, he didn't.

00:02:51.920 He used the whole word, not F.

00:02:53.940 But, yep.

00:02:56.740 Somewhere, somewhere, there's a white person putting on a costume that's going to ruin his whole life. 0.95

00:03:04.240 Or her whole life.

00:03:05.500 But I think it's probably a guy.

00:03:07.500 If I might be sexist for a moment, it's probably a guy.

00:03:11.580 It doesn't have to be.

00:03:13.140 Or probably.

00:03:14.020 Probably.

00:03:16.840 There's a story about Alec Baldwin.

00:03:19.220 He's finally talking to the press.

00:03:20.600 And as he was talking, his wife, Hilaria, tried to interject yourself into it.

00:03:26.740 And apparently, it's reported that Alec Baldwin snapped at his wife.

00:03:31.640 He snapped at her. 0.98

00:03:33.800 What was a word that they might have used in the past for a story like this?

00:03:39.540 Snapped at her. 0.75

00:03:41.280 Something about what she did caused a reaction in him to make him snap.

00:03:48.240 There's another word for that, isn't it?

00:03:50.600 Triggered.

00:03:52.000 Triggered.

00:03:52.820 Yeah.

00:03:53.840 Don't they usually say triggered?

00:03:56.460 I don't know why they didn't use it this time.

00:03:59.760 Well, my favorite story of the day, and it's hard to pick a favorite today.

00:04:03.460 Because the news is all crazy stuff.

00:04:06.140 But my favorite, probably, is the Lincoln Project.

00:04:10.160 You know, the Lincoln Project.

00:04:11.560 They're sort of the anti-Republican group.

00:04:15.780 Mostly they were anti-Trump, but anti-Republican, it seems.

00:04:18.960 And they're ex-Republicans, I guess.

00:04:22.560 So that was their deal.

00:04:24.520 And they tried to influence the Virginia governor race by having five of their members dress up as white supremacists.

00:04:33.800 Now, if you didn't know how white supremacists dress, this is one of the things that the Lincoln Project taught us.

00:04:43.280 Apparently, to dress like a white supremacist, you need a shirt, preferably white, with a collar.

00:04:50.200 And you need khaki pants, long khaki pants, and maybe a baseball hat.

00:04:59.640 You put that outfit on, and you accessorize with a tiki torch, and anybody's going to think you're a white supremacist.

00:05:09.440 Anybody who sees that, they're going to say, well, that's a white supremacist.

00:05:13.620 Look, you might as well be wearing the hood.

00:05:16.200 I mean, that's the whole uniform right there.

00:05:19.200 And so five of them pretended to be actual white supremacists,

00:05:23.380 and they posed in front of the Republican candidate's bus to make it seem as if he was associated with the white supremacy.

00:05:31.640 Now, I've seen this story for sort of a couple days old, or several days old, the story.

00:05:40.640 And there was one small detail in the story that I missed.

00:05:44.600 And what I understood about it was that people were wondering whether these were real white supremacists

00:05:51.240 or perhaps, you know, some kind of a political theater.

00:05:55.600 And, you know, I looked quickly at the picture and wasn't too interested.

00:05:58.760 And I thought to myself, yeah, it looks like some people pretending to be white supremacists, or maybe they are, I don't know.

00:06:04.760 But I didn't really look too closely at the picture.

00:06:07.900 Did anybody look closely at the picture?

00:06:11.300 There were only five of them.

00:06:13.820 One of them's black.

00:06:17.140 I'm not making this up.

00:06:19.240 They sent a black guy to pretend to be a white supremacist.

00:06:24.120 And there were only five people.

00:06:25.620 But they decided that diversity in their project was perhaps more important than authenticity.

00:06:34.420 And so they favored diversity over authenticity and sent a black guy, which represented 20% of all the people there.

00:06:43.900 And one was a woman, a white woman. 1.00

00:06:46.240 And this is how well they did their prank.

00:06:51.340 Now, here's the funny part.

00:06:53.380 You're probably thinking to yourself, you know, if I were going to design a prank where I was trying to convince people that these were white supremacists,

00:07:00.400 I probably would discriminate against the black candidate for that job. 1.00

00:07:06.220 I don't know.

00:07:06.720 I probably would discriminate, because that's just me.

00:07:10.980 I have a bad character.

00:07:13.180 But the people of the Lincoln Project have shown us the way and showed us what good character looks like and people who are more woke, I think.

00:07:22.900 And so 20% of their white supremacists were a black man.

00:07:26.800 You have to admire their commitment to diversity.

00:07:31.940 I think that's admirable.

00:07:34.980 CNN has some fake news.

00:07:36.880 Surprise?

00:07:37.680 Are you surprised?

00:07:39.220 Are you surprised that CNN has some fake news?

00:07:42.480 Well, here's the fake headline trick, where the headline doesn't match the story.

00:07:47.840 I think this is their favorite trick, because people don't read the story.

00:07:53.520 Is anybody guilty of reading the headline and thinking, well, I don't think I need to read the story, because the headline is the story?

00:08:01.280 You know, if you read a headline that says, Biden stubs his toe, do you need to read the rest of the story?

00:08:10.940 Because if he had hurt himself badly, it would say, you know, Biden hospitalized.

00:08:14.280 But you read a headline, Biden stubs his toe, you think, well, I don't need the detail.

00:08:19.780 I don't need to know which toe it was or how he did it.

00:08:22.120 He stubbed his toe.

00:08:23.760 So CNN does this, where they'll give you the headline to make you think you know the story.

00:08:29.440 And this one was, their headline was, quote, a completely damning video of a Trump ally emerges.

00:08:36.540 And it showed an undercover video of conservative lawyer John Eastman.

00:08:40.780 And he was part of the conversation about, you know, not certifying the election and seeing if Pence would overturn it.

00:08:50.160 And so I decided to play the completely damning video.

00:08:57.800 There wasn't anything even slightly damning in it.

00:09:00.800 It was like nothing damning at all.

00:09:03.160 It was literally exactly what you already knew, that he and other people thought, yeah, wouldn't it be great if Pence could overturn this thing?

00:09:11.980 It's all the stuff we do.

00:09:14.000 There's literally nothing damning in it.

00:09:16.200 That isn't just common knowledge already.

00:09:18.920 So, yes, the completely damning video that had no damning information in it.

00:09:22.820 Here's some more fake CNN news, where the headline doesn't match the news.

00:09:27.820 It said that Fox News is trying to distance itself from Tucker Carlson.

00:09:33.580 Fox News is trying to distance itself from Tucker Carlson.

00:09:38.300 And it's because, and you say to yourself, whoa.

00:09:41.460 You know, the implication of this is, whoa.

00:09:44.280 Even Fox News management has figured out what a monster Tucker Carlson is. 1.00

00:09:50.900 So they're trying to distance themselves.

00:09:52.580 But then you listen to the story, or you read it, and is the story about Fox News distancing itself?

00:10:02.880 Nope.

00:10:03.940 Nope.

00:10:05.060 It's not the story.

00:10:06.500 Here's the story that they characterized as Fox News distancing itself.

00:10:11.600 Apparently, in an exchange with some publicist or PR person associated with Fox News, that person, the PR person said, quote,

00:10:23.980 Can you please add, so it's clear, that these new episodes, talking about the new series that Tucker Carlson is having.

00:10:34.800 And he said, Can you make it clear that these episodes are on Fox Nation?

00:10:37.840 Now, that's their app where you can see extra opinion stuff.

00:10:41.600 Make it clear that it's on Fox Nation, the subscription-based streaming platform that is behind a paywall.

00:10:48.520 I don't see that noted anywhere in the piece.

00:10:51.520 Tucker Carlson Originals, which is what this episode is, is not for the channel, meaning not for the regular Fox News.

00:10:58.480 Now, is that an example of Fox News distancing itself from Tucker Carlson?

00:11:04.900 I don't see it.

00:11:08.660 Here's what I see.

00:11:11.080 Fox News is really good at separating news from opinion.

00:11:17.300 That's what just happened.

00:11:19.160 Fox News said, Make sure you know that we separate the news from the opinion.

00:11:24.240 Now, Fox News Channel, as opposed to Fox Nation, the app that they also are associated with,

00:11:31.540 Fox News Channel also does a good job, in my opinion, of saying this program is news and this is opinion.

00:11:39.480 Whereas CNN, what's the big criticism you hear from me about CNN?

00:11:45.020 That they don't do that.

00:11:46.080 Their news slash opinion is sort of merged.

00:11:52.320 All their news is opinion-y.

00:11:54.600 And I'm not saying that's good or bad.

00:11:57.060 I'm just saying that's a different business model.

00:11:59.520 Whereas Fox News likes to let you know what's news and what's opinion.

00:12:04.200 And I think a PR person just emphasized exactly what they want you to know.

00:12:09.120 What is news and what's opinion?

00:12:10.680 If it's on Fox Nation, it's opinion.

00:12:12.560 Now, is that distancing or is that clarifying?

00:12:18.040 To me, it's just clarifying.

00:12:20.080 It's clarifying a basic corporate philosophy of separating their news from their opinion.

00:12:26.560 But it's treated like CNN, like it's some kind of flaw.

00:12:31.000 All right.

00:12:31.700 So I call that fake news.

00:12:35.000 Then New York Times had a little fake news themselves.

00:12:38.560 So I was reading an article just, I think it was today.

00:12:44.820 It said that the New York Times, it said that the FBI informants, the idea that there were

00:12:49.920 FBI informants behind January 6th, that it was actually organized as like a false flag,

00:12:55.340 et cetera, has been debunked, has been repeatedly debunked.

00:13:00.980 So that's what the New York Times says.

00:13:02.360 That the idea that the FBI was behind the January 6th stuff has been repeatedly debunked.

00:13:09.060 And they linked it to two articles.

00:13:12.700 One was hyperlinked repeatedly, and the other was separately debunked.

00:13:19.380 Now, if you're reading this, do you say to yourself, oh, it looks like this is pretty well debunked,

00:13:25.000 because it's been debunked repeatedly and debunked.

00:13:28.720 Now, do you click on those links?

00:13:32.160 How many people click on those two links?

00:13:34.840 They say it's been repeatedly, and here you can see for yourself, debunked, and see for

00:13:39.560 yourself.

00:13:40.640 Well, I click those links to see if they've been repeatedly debunked.

00:13:46.260 Here's what debunked means in the New York Times way of thinking.

00:13:51.220 First of all, it's a link to their own reporting.

00:13:53.880 Okay.

00:13:54.640 Just note that.

00:13:55.540 It's their own reporting.

00:13:56.400 It said that there is no evidence of this claim in June.

00:14:03.300 So in early June, they said there's no evidence for this claim.

00:14:07.540 Is that debunked?

00:14:10.680 If a major news organization says there's no evidence of a thing they looked for no evidence

00:14:17.080 of, we didn't find anything when we didn't do our research, and when we didn't look for

00:14:23.520 it, there was nothing there.

00:14:24.500 And that's what they called it, a debunk.

00:14:27.800 It's debunked because they didn't look for it and didn't find it.

00:14:31.940 Now, I happen to think it didn't happen.

00:14:34.800 Just to be clear, I want to be clear, I don't think the FBI organized the riots.

00:14:42.400 I'm open to the argument, though.

00:14:44.440 I'm open to the argument that there was some involvement, and maybe in some way you could

00:14:48.960 claim that that happened.

00:14:49.720 I'm open to it.

00:14:51.420 I just, same as the New York Times, I haven't seen any argument to debunk it, or I'm sorry,

00:14:58.020 I haven't seen any evidence for it.

00:15:01.100 Now, I also haven't seen the special because it hasn't run yet.

00:15:05.760 So, I think they're debunking something they haven't seen that has to be noted.

00:15:12.200 They've only seen the trailer, and I can't imagine the trailer gives you the context you

00:15:16.320 would need.

00:15:17.860 So, the FBI, so that was one link.

00:15:21.160 One link was from June.

00:15:22.760 Now, isn't the entire, I haven't seen the special, of course, because it hasn't run, but back me

00:15:28.900 on this assumption, we can't know for sure, but isn't the assumption that we've learned

00:15:33.640 something since June?

00:15:36.040 Am I wrong about this?

00:15:37.540 Give me a fact check on this.

00:15:39.380 Isn't the whole Tucker Carlson special based on what we've learned since June?

00:15:46.880 Am I wrong?

00:15:48.840 Yeah, I think I'm right.

00:15:50.060 So, when the New York Times says it's been repeatedly debunked and linked to an article

00:15:54.800 from June, when the entire point of it is we've learned things recently, that's just

00:16:01.460 fake news, isn't it?

00:16:02.960 How is that not fake news?

00:16:05.240 I mean, it looks like it's intended to be misleading.

00:16:08.820 It doesn't look like an accident, does it?

00:16:12.100 And then the other link I looked at was from March.

00:16:16.500 It was from March.

00:16:17.520 Do you think we've learned anything about January 6th since March?

00:16:23.720 And the New York Times was trying to sell these two links as clearly debunking it.

00:16:29.000 And then the only debunk in it was a link to Snopes basically saying it was unfounded in March.

00:16:38.140 So, again, I actually, my prediction would be that no matter how much you look into it,

00:16:43.700 and no matter what I hear on Tucker Carlson's show that I haven't seen yet, because it hasn't aired,

00:16:49.400 I don't think that that will, that the speculation that the FBI caused it, I don't think that that's going to hold.

00:16:57.640 But I could be wrong.

00:16:59.420 Does everybody hear this part?

00:17:01.640 Because if it turns out I'm wrong, I want you to remember the part where I said,

00:17:06.220 you know, I'm not positive about it, but my best guess, if I had to put odds on it, 80%,

00:17:14.640 I'd say I'm 80% confident you won't find the FBI who is behind it.

00:17:19.840 But 20% is a pretty big number.

00:17:23.520 And the 20% isn't based on anything except just how I feel, you know, experience, I guess.

00:17:28.640 All right, President Biden met with Turkey's Erdogan,

00:17:36.560 and it made me wonder, is there a story that hasn't been told?

00:17:42.400 Correct me if I'm wrong.

00:17:43.860 Go back into the Wayback Machine.

00:17:46.240 Reverse your time.

00:17:49.460 I take you back to a time when a president named Trump

00:17:53.540 was discussing pulling American troops out of Syria,

00:17:57.860 and the big conversation was,

00:17:59.660 you fool, you fool, you can't do that,

00:18:02.240 because the Kurds who have been our allies

00:18:04.320 will be slaughtered the moment we leave.

00:18:07.540 That really happened, right?

00:18:08.960 I mean, the story happened.

00:18:11.600 And then time passes.

00:18:15.020 What happened to the Kurds?

00:18:18.460 Is there any update on the Kurds?

00:18:20.500 Because I was kind of worried about that, weren't you?

00:18:26.080 I mean, that seemed like a pretty major deal.

00:18:29.780 Not just in terms of, you know, life and death,

00:18:32.720 but in terms of strategic, I don't know, branding for the United States.

00:18:37.480 If we could abandon that ally, we could abandon another.

00:18:41.660 And apparently we did in Afghanistan.

00:18:43.420 So I think it's a big part of the story.

00:18:46.300 Did the Kurds have a bad ending?

00:18:49.220 Or did they just negotiate their way

00:18:51.940 to some kind of a, you know, stable situation?

00:18:57.620 Does anybody know what happened?

00:19:00.420 Yeah.

00:19:01.080 Were the Kurds in the way? 0.99

00:19:09.440 Somebody's asking me if I'm biased

00:19:11.000 because I'm predicting that the FBI were not involved.

00:19:14.640 But I don't know.

00:19:15.700 What would be the bias?

00:19:17.680 Biased by what?

00:19:18.560 If you're looking at just a prediction

00:19:23.360 that's just based on how I feel and my experience,

00:19:27.340 it's not really based on much,

00:19:29.320 then I would say, I don't know if it's bias

00:19:31.820 or just we're all biased all the time.

00:19:34.500 So maybe that's just built into it.

00:19:36.540 I think bias is built into every prediction, isn't it?

00:19:39.720 I don't think you can separate that.

00:19:41.960 All right.

00:19:42.740 Here's what I would like all of you to do.

00:19:44.500 I don't ask you for much, do I?

00:19:48.180 I mean, I try to give you this best quality entertainment

00:19:51.460 that's ever existed in the history of civilization and before.

00:19:55.340 And what do I ask in return?

00:19:58.980 What do I ask in return?

00:20:00.720 Very little.

00:20:01.900 Very little.

00:20:02.900 But today I have an ask.

00:20:04.420 And I would like us all to join together

00:20:08.080 in what I consider a very important cause,

00:20:11.600 which is a prank to see how many people we can convince

00:20:16.200 that President Biden's real name,

00:20:19.880 that his real legal name,

00:20:21.420 is Francis Joseph Biden.

00:20:26.300 Also known as F. Joe Biden.

00:20:30.720 Can we do that?

00:20:32.540 Can we start calling him Francis Joseph Biden?

00:20:36.380 Just sort of throw it in, you know, some references.

00:20:39.300 Don't even make a big deal about it.

00:20:41.380 Maybe just do a tweet in which you refer to him that way.

00:20:44.840 Possibly when you're talking to your friends,

00:20:46.940 you say, I don't know,

00:20:48.840 I'm not so sure Francis Joseph Biden

00:20:51.000 is doing the job that we elected him for.

00:20:53.880 Or you might say,

00:20:55.440 oh, I heard that Francis Joseph Biden

00:20:58.860 was visiting the Pope.

00:21:00.880 And don't make a big deal about it.

00:21:02.540 Just throw it in as a reference.

00:21:05.120 Francis Joseph Biden.

00:21:07.100 Because if we can get this to work,

00:21:09.320 then we can also tweet F.JoeBiden.

00:21:13.580 And it looks like we're just talking about his name.

00:21:16.340 So F.JoeBiden, president.

00:21:18.840 Which leads to a very important question

00:21:23.140 from Twitter user Willy Nilly,

00:21:25.840 who asked this insightful question.

00:21:27.760 Did people hate Scott Fitzgerald?

00:21:33.620 I'm just going to let that settle for a little bit.

00:21:37.440 Did people hate Scott Fitzgerald?

00:21:40.420 Now, that's only for you who are literary in nature

00:21:43.600 and know that there's a famous author

00:21:46.260 named F. Scott Fitzgerald.

00:21:48.480 It's very funny if you knew that.

00:21:51.180 All right.

00:21:52.240 We have a new video of Biden molesting the Pope.

00:21:57.160 And by molesting, I mean

00:21:58.900 when Joe Biden grabs your hand for a handshake,

00:22:02.500 that mofo doesn't let go. 0.86

00:22:05.880 And it got a little too close.

00:22:09.040 And you've got to watch the video

00:22:10.460 of Joe Biden not releasing the Pope's hand,

00:22:14.140 getting way too close to his personal space

00:22:16.240 during a pandemic,

00:22:17.900 and spitting a very long story onto his face.

00:22:24.180 And, you know, they say that you can get,

00:22:27.520 you can still carry COVID if you're vaccinated.

00:22:30.240 Now, I know the president probably gets tested

00:22:32.420 every day and every time he goes into a meeting

00:22:34.800 with world leaders.

00:22:36.460 But there's a non-zero chance

00:22:39.320 that Francis Joseph Biden

00:22:42.040 just gave the Pope COVID.

00:22:46.980 Which I don't wish on the Pope at all.

00:22:50.040 I don't wish on the Pope at all.

00:22:52.380 But here's another reference.

00:22:55.460 You're going to make a joke

00:22:56.300 that no more than 20% of you will get.

00:22:59.620 So this is just for the 20% who get it.

00:23:01.580 When I saw the photo of Joe Biden

00:23:03.960 together with the Pope,

00:23:05.220 I thought to myself,

00:23:06.740 huh, I'll bet both of them shit in the woods.

00:23:11.900 Anybody?

00:23:13.560 Anybody?

00:23:14.980 That reference?

00:23:16.900 I think both of them shit in the woods?

00:23:19.300 Anybody?

00:23:21.500 Okay.

00:23:22.440 I guess that one was just for me.

00:23:25.720 Maybe it was just for me.

00:23:27.200 But if you knew what I was referring to,

00:23:31.100 it's kind of funny.

00:23:32.360 It's kind of funny.

00:23:34.840 All right.

00:23:35.400 So there's a Rupar video of their meeting.

00:23:38.880 By Rupar, I mean a deviously edited video

00:23:42.320 to make Biden look more incapable

00:23:46.220 than he actually is.

00:23:47.580 So the video,

00:23:49.140 in the real thing,

00:23:50.640 without the fake edit,

00:23:51.720 that Biden is launching into a very long story

00:23:55.160 about Satchel Paige,

00:23:56.820 a black baseball player

00:23:58.100 who, I don't know,

00:23:59.420 broke some records.

00:24:01.080 And

00:24:01.400 the Rupar part

00:24:05.420 is they cut out the part

00:24:06.720 where Biden

00:24:08.320 explains what he's talking about.

00:24:10.320 and it looks like

00:24:12.200 Biden is

00:24:13.200 it looks like

00:24:21.020 it looks like

00:24:22.240 it looks like

00:24:26.840 it looks like Biden

00:24:28.340 thinks he's meeting Satchel Paige.

00:24:35.280 But

00:24:36.000 Satchel Paige,

00:24:38.160 a famous old baseball player

00:24:40.440 who was black.

00:24:43.600 And

00:24:44.080 and the funniest part is

00:24:45.620 I saw people in the comments

00:24:46.760 who are like,

00:24:47.420 you know,

00:24:47.780 WTF?

00:24:48.880 What's going on here?

00:24:50.020 Because they actually thought

00:24:51.140 they thought it was within

00:24:52.680 the realm of possibility

00:24:53.940 that

00:24:54.900 that Biden

00:24:56.440 had met the Pope

00:24:57.300 and confused him

00:24:58.580 with an American

00:24:59.240 black baseball player.

00:25:01.280 And

00:25:01.300 and

00:25:03.500 you have to ask yourself

00:25:05.000 if there are American citizens

00:25:06.780 who

00:25:07.200 who

00:25:07.520 their

00:25:08.160 their first

00:25:08.840 encounter with that

00:25:10.220 was that it was probably true.

00:25:14.080 And that's the leader we

00:25:15.320 that's the leader we elected.

00:25:17.940 Oh

00:25:18.240 but my favorite part

00:25:19.720 you have to see this video

00:25:21.100 it's funny all the way through

00:25:22.420 but

00:25:23.240 the funniest part to me

00:25:24.660 was

00:25:25.480 the funniest part to me

00:25:31.900 was

00:25:32.800 Biden's

00:25:33.300 you know

00:25:33.520 holding his hand

00:25:34.760 and

00:25:35.180 holding him too close

00:25:36.460 and he launches into

00:25:37.720 this boring story

00:25:38.780 and then

00:25:40.140 the

00:25:40.540 I guess the translator

00:25:41.720 realized

00:25:42.260 uh oh

00:25:42.700 you know

00:25:43.540 this is more than

00:25:44.260 how are you doing

00:25:44.900 so I'd better run in there

00:25:46.100 and translate.

00:25:47.380 So the translator

00:25:48.060 runs in there

00:25:48.760 to translate

00:25:49.560 his

00:25:49.860 his way too long

00:25:51.060 boring story

00:25:51.820 about

00:25:52.060 Satchel Paige

00:25:53.000 you know

00:25:54.020 winning

00:25:54.600 I don't know

00:25:55.420 doing a

00:25:56.080 shutout at age 45

00:25:57.400 or something like that

00:25:58.200 and

00:25:59.080 as Biden gets to

00:26:00.380 close to the end

00:26:02.020 of the story

00:26:02.620 but he hasn't reached

00:26:03.960 the punchline

00:26:04.680 the translator

00:26:06.200 tells the Pope

00:26:06.960 you know

00:26:07.240 he's not done

00:26:07.740 with the story

00:26:08.240 but the Pope

00:26:09.440 I think

00:26:10.360 hoping that the story

00:26:11.400 is over

00:26:11.800 he does the universal

00:26:13.660 the universal

00:26:15.400 body language

00:26:16.320 that says

00:26:16.740 ah ha ha

00:26:17.300 that's a good story

00:26:18.780 and we're done

00:26:19.300 with the story

00:26:19.760 now

00:26:19.980 he does the

00:26:20.860 you know

00:26:23.300 the fake laugh

00:26:24.080 but then

00:26:25.500 he realizes

00:26:26.100 that wasn't

00:26:26.860 the punchline

00:26:27.480 that there's

00:26:28.720 more to come

00:26:29.320 and I

00:26:30.120 and I could

00:26:30.460 just imagine

00:26:31.040 the Pope

00:26:31.500 like praying

00:26:32.320 to God

00:26:32.800 in that moment

00:26:33.480 dear God

00:26:34.740 please make him

00:26:36.580 let go of my hand

00:26:37.440 and end this story

00:26:38.320 get his

00:26:39.500 COVID spittle

00:26:41.040 out of my face

00:26:42.500 dear God

00:26:43.720 what have I done

00:26:44.360 to you

00:26:44.800 have I sinned

00:26:45.900 well I thought

00:26:46.800 I'd been a good

00:26:47.480 Catholic

00:26:48.000 no help me

00:26:49.400 help me

00:26:49.960 help me

00:26:50.520 now that's what

00:26:51.320 I thought the Pope

00:26:52.120 was thinking

00:26:52.640 but maybe I'm

00:26:54.660 wrong about that

00:26:55.340 really

00:26:55.800 just speculation

00:26:56.660 well what else

00:27:01.360 is happening

00:27:01.860 and the other

00:27:04.640 thing that's funny

00:27:05.260 about that story

00:27:06.040 is it was the

00:27:07.120 kind of story

00:27:07.860 that you

00:27:08.460 you really don't

00:27:09.400 think there's

00:27:09.800 much chance

00:27:10.440 it's going to

00:27:10.840 translate too

00:27:11.480 well

00:27:11.720 and but

00:27:13.840 Biden was not

00:27:15.900 was not

00:27:16.700 disappointed

00:27:17.160 all right

00:27:17.660 there's an

00:27:19.740 interesting little

00:27:20.620 Twitter battle

00:27:22.420 going on

00:27:23.080 if you can

00:27:23.460 call it that

00:27:23.940 between

00:27:24.300 anti-racist

00:27:26.760 what would you

00:27:28.280 call him

00:27:28.680 Ibram Kendi

00:27:30.100 if you like him

00:27:32.680 you'd call him

00:27:33.460 a warrior

00:27:35.000 on the side

00:27:36.560 of anti-racism

00:27:37.500 and one of the

00:27:38.740 most famous

00:27:39.160 people

00:27:39.600 promoting

00:27:41.000 you know

00:27:42.640 the fight

00:27:43.680 against

00:27:44.120 systemic racism

00:27:45.700 now if you

00:27:46.920 don't like him

00:27:47.540 you would say

00:27:49.020 he's a racist

00:27:49.660 so depending on

00:27:51.480 whether you like

00:27:52.080 him or you

00:27:52.540 don't like him

00:27:53.040 he's either

00:27:53.520 obviously a racist

00:27:55.020 or he's an

00:27:55.720 anti-racist

00:27:56.380 so he's the

00:27:57.980 greatest person

00:27:58.620 or the worst

00:27:59.040 person depending

00:27:59.700 on your point

00:28:00.140 of view

00:28:00.380 and he had a

00:28:02.080 little Twitter

00:28:02.480 exchange with

00:28:03.160 Jack Posobiec

00:28:04.200 you all know

00:28:05.300 Jack from

00:28:06.120 Twitter

00:28:06.400 and the issue

00:28:09.940 was about

00:28:10.700 so Ibram Kendi

00:28:13.380 at first

00:28:14.500 some background

00:28:15.500 I told you about

00:28:16.180 this story before

00:28:16.900 but there's an

00:28:17.380 update to it

00:28:17.960 so Kendi

00:28:19.460 had tweeted

00:28:20.060 that there

00:28:21.360 were a bunch

00:28:21.720 of white

00:28:22.100 people

00:28:22.560 who were

00:28:23.320 applying to

00:28:23.820 college

00:28:24.220 and lying

00:28:24.820 about their

00:28:25.260 ethnicity

00:28:25.680 thinking it

00:28:26.880 would give

00:28:27.140 them an 0.87

00:28:27.760 advantage

00:28:28.160 and the

00:28:31.120 I guess

00:28:31.880 75%

00:28:32.760 of the

00:28:33.660 kids who

00:28:34.180 claimed they

00:28:34.600 were Native

00:28:35.080 American

00:28:35.540 got accepted

00:28:36.280 to college

00:28:36.780 and so

00:28:39.980 and then he

00:28:40.700 later deleted

00:28:41.720 his own tweet

00:28:42.500 and a lot

00:28:44.340 of people

00:28:44.660 including me

00:28:45.420 said well

00:28:46.240 I think

00:28:46.720 there's an

00:28:47.280 obvious reason

00:28:48.040 he deleted

00:28:48.540 the tweet

00:28:49.000 because it

00:28:50.040 proves everything

00:28:50.720 he said

00:28:51.280 is wrong

00:28:52.320 that systemic

00:28:54.740 racism does

00:28:56.000 exist but it's

00:28:56.760 against white

00:28:57.400 people because

00:28:58.520 white people are 0.70

00:28:59.320 trying to pretend

00:29:00.100 to be another

00:29:00.820 ethnicity to get 0.96

00:29:01.820 advantages

00:29:02.360 and so the

00:29:04.720 speculation is

00:29:05.600 because we can't

00:29:06.260 read Ibram

00:29:07.760 Kendi's mind

00:29:08.840 and I don't think

00:29:09.980 it would be fair

00:29:10.440 to do that

00:29:10.980 but the

00:29:11.940 speculation was

00:29:12.920 the reason

00:29:13.720 he

00:29:14.060 let's get rid

00:29:17.260 of this

00:29:17.560 red-haired

00:29:18.020 guy again

00:29:18.600 goodbye

00:29:20.260 all right

00:29:21.640 the speculation

00:29:22.400 is that he

00:29:23.280 realized that

00:29:23.880 his tweet

00:29:24.420 debunked his

00:29:25.720 entire philosophy

00:29:26.720 and reason for

00:29:27.480 being because

00:29:28.420 it showed that

00:29:28.980 white people

00:29:29.400 were pretending

00:29:29.980 to be people

00:29:31.200 of color to

00:29:31.860 get advantages

00:29:32.420 now when

00:29:33.880 Jack

00:29:34.240 Posabek

00:29:35.840 tweeted

00:29:36.620 you know

00:29:37.660 something of

00:29:38.180 that nature

00:29:38.680 Jack used

00:29:41.580 the phrase

00:29:42.160 I broke

00:29:43.960 him

00:29:44.160 or I broke

00:29:45.360 I broke

00:29:46.680 Kendi

00:29:47.100 so that was

00:29:48.500 Jack's tweet

00:29:49.100 and it was

00:29:49.800 referring to

00:29:50.440 the you know

00:29:51.200 the exchange

00:29:52.760 and

00:29:54.160 I have to

00:29:57.120 agree with

00:29:57.840 Jack except

00:29:59.040 if I did

00:30:00.900 if I did

00:30:02.820 apparently

00:30:03.900 I'd be a

00:30:04.440 racist

00:30:04.840 because what

00:30:05.960 we learned

00:30:06.380 from Ibram

00:30:07.500 Kendi

00:30:07.760 is that

00:30:09.120 using the

00:30:10.240 words that

00:30:10.900 you broke

00:30:11.580 him

00:30:11.860 if it's

00:30:12.800 referring to

00:30:13.440 a black

00:30:14.080 man or

00:30:14.540 woman 0.99

00:30:14.840 that you

00:30:15.980 broke

00:30:16.380 them

00:30:16.680 that is

00:30:17.780 a reference

00:30:18.360 to slavery

00:30:19.060 did you know

00:30:20.580 that

00:30:20.800 did you know

00:30:22.100 that you

00:30:22.440 say when

00:30:22.820 you say

00:30:23.100 you broke

00:30:23.600 somebody

00:30:24.060 it's actually

00:30:25.280 that historical

00:30:26.260 roots are

00:30:27.840 in slavery

00:30:28.360 and so really

00:30:29.060 it's a reference

00:30:29.540 to breaking

00:30:30.100 a slave

00:30:30.540 did you

00:30:31.640 know that

00:30:32.100 no you

00:30:33.680 didn't know

00:30:34.120 that because

00:30:34.600 it's not

00:30:34.980 fucking true

00:30:35.760 right

00:30:36.800 now it

00:30:38.740 might be

00:30:39.080 historically

00:30:39.540 true that

00:30:40.020 the word

00:30:40.340 was used

00:30:40.860 in slavery

00:30:42.180 I don't

00:30:42.560 know

00:30:42.800 but words

00:30:44.120 get used

00:30:44.820 in lots

00:30:45.720 of different

00:30:46.080 ways

00:30:46.460 when people

00:30:47.840 say they

00:30:48.320 broke somebody 0.85

00:30:49.020 it is purely

00:30:49.900 a Twitter

00:30:50.460 reference

00:30:51.040 it's a

00:30:51.960 social media

00:30:52.500 reference

00:30:53.020 that's all

00:30:53.720 it is

00:30:54.060 and

00:30:55.080 what does

00:30:57.540 it tell

00:30:57.860 you when

00:30:58.400 somebody makes

00:30:59.080 a point

00:30:59.560 and then

00:31:00.080 the response

00:31:00.660 to the

00:31:00.960 point

00:31:01.160 is to

00:31:01.560 attack

00:31:01.980 the

00:31:02.720 messenger

00:31:03.220 what does

00:31:05.120 it mean

00:31:05.620 when somebody

00:31:06.460 ignores

00:31:07.260 the point

00:31:08.200 and attacks

00:31:09.740 the messenger

00:31:10.840 in this case

00:31:12.180 by calling

00:31:12.660 Jack

00:31:13.000 a racist

00:31:14.000 for using

00:31:14.660 the term

00:31:15.180 broke

00:31:15.900 what's that

00:31:18.100 mean

00:31:18.320 well it could

00:31:20.480 mean that

00:31:20.960 you're dealing

00:31:21.340 with a

00:31:22.080 vulnerable

00:31:23.180 narcissist

00:31:23.780 that would

00:31:24.760 be one

00:31:25.280 possible

00:31:26.020 explanation

00:31:26.780 because

00:31:27.620 vulnerable

00:31:28.020 narcissists

00:31:28.720 use this

00:31:29.260 technique

00:31:29.740 if you

00:31:31.060 counter

00:31:32.020 their argument

00:31:32.660 with anything

00:31:33.280 effective

00:31:33.740 they will

00:31:34.640 never argue

00:31:35.220 their argument

00:31:35.740 they will

00:31:36.480 go right

00:31:36.880 at what's

00:31:37.200 wrong

00:31:37.400 with you

00:31:37.760 they attack

00:31:38.420 the messenger

00:31:38.920 so I'm

00:31:40.320 not saying

00:31:40.700 that Kendi

00:31:41.480 is a

00:31:42.120 vulnerable

00:31:42.480 narcissist

00:31:42.960 I'm just

00:31:43.500 saying that's

00:31:43.920 a behavior

00:31:44.360 associated

00:31:45.000 with people

00:31:46.040 who have

00:31:46.280 a personality

00:31:46.840 disorder

00:31:47.380 so

00:31:48.720 whatever

00:31:49.700 the issue

00:31:51.220 is with

00:31:51.740 Kendi

00:31:52.000 it matches

00:31:53.060 the symptoms

00:31:54.180 of a

00:31:54.560 personality

00:31:55.020 disorder

00:31:55.620 as opposed

00:31:56.880 to an

00:31:57.660 argument

00:31:58.020 but then

00:32:01.020 Kendi

00:32:01.260 said that

00:32:01.860 Jack lied

00:32:03.240 about Kendi's

00:32:04.760 tweet

00:32:05.060 but he didn't

00:32:06.100 really detail

00:32:07.660 what he lied

00:32:08.200 about so I

00:32:08.720 tweeted to ask

00:32:09.380 for a

00:32:09.620 clarification

00:32:10.100 and what

00:32:12.320 Kendi

00:32:12.760 said was

00:32:13.380 that Jack

00:32:15.920 was basically

00:32:16.860 mischaracterizing

00:32:17.940 Kendi's

00:32:18.900 thinking

00:32:19.260 because

00:32:20.520 he referred

00:32:22.000 to Jack's

00:32:22.540 tweet

00:32:22.760 as a

00:32:23.140 tortured

00:32:23.480 line

00:32:23.880 of

00:32:24.040 thinking

00:32:24.380 that since

00:32:25.560 white

00:32:25.840 applicants

00:32:26.360 quote

00:32:26.760 think they

00:32:27.560 get an

00:32:27.900 advantage

00:32:28.400 by lying

00:32:29.600 then it

00:32:30.100 must be

00:32:30.440 true

00:32:30.720 therefore

00:32:32.040 structural

00:32:32.620 racism

00:32:33.100 doesn't

00:32:33.640 exist

00:32:34.080 now

00:32:35.040 this is

00:32:35.880 Kendi

00:32:36.120 putting a

00:32:36.840 ridiculous

00:32:37.440 argument

00:32:37.880 into

00:32:38.400 Jack's

00:32:40.280 head

00:32:40.760 as if

00:32:41.900 Jack said

00:32:42.300 it

00:32:42.480 which is

00:32:43.220 the typical

00:32:43.720 Twitter way

00:32:44.280 of arguing

00:32:44.680 I guess

00:32:45.220 but

00:32:47.280 here's

00:32:47.800 the thing

00:32:48.260 is the

00:32:51.400 problem

00:32:51.740 that the

00:32:52.220 white

00:32:52.460 applicants

00:32:53.000 wrongly

00:32:54.260 believe

00:32:54.620 they'll

00:32:54.880 get it

00:32:55.280 get a

00:32:56.400 advantage

00:32:57.160 because the

00:32:57.880 story also

00:32:58.320 says 75%

00:32:59.540 of the ones

00:32:59.980 who used

00:33:00.360 this trick

00:33:01.060 got accepted

00:33:01.740 to college

00:33:02.300 but I don't

00:33:03.820 know what

00:33:04.120 is normal

00:33:04.620 you know

00:33:06.540 if

00:33:06.740 is it

00:33:07.380 wrong

00:33:07.660 for 75%

00:33:08.760 of the

00:33:09.020 people

00:33:09.240 who apply

00:33:09.560 to college

00:33:09.980 to get

00:33:10.460 accepted

00:33:10.840 to some

00:33:11.860 college

00:33:12.340 is that

00:33:13.640 is that

00:33:15.000 even

00:33:15.260 unusual

00:33:15.800 because I

00:33:16.820 would think

00:33:17.140 that the

00:33:17.420 only people

00:33:17.860 who apply

00:33:18.600 to colleges

00:33:19.100 are people

00:33:19.640 who have

00:33:19.860 a reasonable

00:33:20.560 expectation

00:33:21.800 they could

00:33:22.200 get accepted

00:33:22.760 and you

00:33:23.940 usually only

00:33:24.620 apply to

00:33:25.080 colleges

00:33:25.400 you can

00:33:25.840 get into

00:33:26.300 right

00:33:26.540 like I

00:33:27.800 did not

00:33:28.440 apply to

00:33:28.980 Harvard

00:33:29.300 do you

00:33:30.960 know why

00:33:31.420 I did

00:33:33.680 not apply

00:33:34.300 to

00:33:34.700 Yale

00:33:36.100 guess

00:33:37.800 why

00:33:38.180 couldn't

00:33:39.420 get in

00:33:39.760 I mean

00:33:40.660 it was

00:33:40.860 obvious

00:33:41.140 I couldn't

00:33:41.520 get in

00:33:41.860 came from

00:33:43.220 a very

00:33:43.460 small town

00:33:44.040 it wouldn't

00:33:44.380 matter

00:33:44.660 it wouldn't

00:33:45.480 have mattered

00:33:45.760 anything else

00:33:46.440 you know

00:33:46.920 where I

00:33:47.260 came from

00:33:47.600 I couldn't

00:33:47.920 have gotten

00:33:48.220 in

00:33:48.440 but

00:33:50.660 so

00:33:53.540 so I

00:33:54.100 asked for

00:33:54.460 a clarification

00:33:55.000 from Kendi

00:33:55.760 so I

00:33:56.200 tweeted this

00:33:56.700 morning

00:33:56.980 I don't

00:33:57.880 know if

00:33:58.140 he'll

00:33:58.380 respond

00:33:59.080 I doubt

00:33:59.540 it

00:33:59.800 but

00:34:00.680 I'm

00:34:01.260 actually

00:34:01.580 curious

00:34:02.180 and I

00:34:03.780 think you

00:34:04.100 should be

00:34:04.480 too

00:34:04.780 because

00:34:06.260 what have

00:34:06.900 I told

00:34:07.220 you about

00:34:07.740 my

00:34:08.560 excitement

00:34:09.100 of being

00:34:09.760 wrong

00:34:10.220 it excites

00:34:11.720 me

00:34:12.020 I don't

00:34:13.180 run from

00:34:13.600 being wrong

00:34:14.260 if I

00:34:15.340 could learn

00:34:15.740 something

00:34:16.080 from it

00:34:16.540 and it

00:34:16.840 would

00:34:16.940 like blow

00:34:17.320 my mind

00:34:17.860 to find

00:34:18.200 that I'm

00:34:18.460 wrong

00:34:18.640 it would

00:34:19.420 blow my 0.95

00:34:19.920 mind

00:34:20.220 to find

00:34:20.640 out

00:34:20.920 that

00:34:22.080 that white 0.95

00:34:24.020 applicants

00:34:24.460 don't have

00:34:25.060 a disadvantage

00:34:25.680 in applying

00:34:26.200 to college

00:34:26.740 but maybe

00:34:28.920 maybe

00:34:29.920 I'm going to

00:34:30.280 tell you

00:34:30.520 I'm open

00:34:30.880 to the

00:34:31.120 argument

00:34:31.400 so if

00:34:32.420 Ibram

00:34:32.900 Kendi

00:34:33.320 responds

00:34:34.080 and I

00:34:34.600 doubt he

00:34:34.880 will

00:34:35.040 but if

00:34:35.780 he does

00:34:36.220 I'm open

00:34:36.700 to the

00:34:36.960 argument

00:34:37.260 it's

00:34:37.820 sort of

00:34:38.080 a data

00:34:38.520 the data

00:34:39.680 exists

00:34:40.060 or it

00:34:40.340 doesn't

00:34:41.340 and can

00:34:41.780 you find

00:34:42.220 any data

00:34:42.740 that would

00:34:43.120 suggest

00:34:43.580 that

00:34:44.740 the

00:34:45.740 discrimination

00:34:46.260 in college

00:34:47.040 applications

00:34:47.660 specifically

00:34:48.220 college

00:34:48.760 applications

00:34:49.320 can we

00:34:50.100 find that

00:34:50.520 they

00:34:50.660 discriminate

00:34:51.120 against

00:34:51.540 people

00:34:51.860 of

00:34:52.020 color

00:34:52.220 or would

00:34:53.440 we find

00:34:53.840 that they

00:34:54.160 discriminate

00:34:54.740 in favor

00:34:55.380 of people

00:34:55.820 of color

00:34:56.240 what do you

00:34:57.220 think

00:34:57.380 you would

00:34:57.980 find

00:34:58.280 what do you

00:35:00.000 think

00:35:00.240 I think

00:35:02.400 it's obvious

00:35:02.880 that they

00:35:03.300 discriminate

00:35:03.740 against white

00:35:04.640 applicants

00:35:05.160 and I

00:35:05.800 think

00:35:06.040 I think

00:35:06.660 all the

00:35:06.980 data

00:35:07.160 says that

00:35:07.960 but

00:35:09.100 if

00:35:10.480 Kendi

00:35:10.760 thinks

00:35:11.140 the

00:35:11.700 opposite

00:35:12.060 and he

00:35:12.840 he's

00:35:13.140 sort of

00:35:13.380 silent

00:35:13.660 on this

00:35:13.980 point

00:35:14.240 because I

00:35:15.220 think what

00:35:15.540 Kendi

00:35:15.800 did was

00:35:16.400 say that

00:35:16.940 Jack had

00:35:17.620 mischaracterized

00:35:18.800 his point

00:35:19.420 to make it

00:35:20.520 a larger

00:35:20.940 point than

00:35:21.480 he was

00:35:21.780 making

00:35:22.140 and that

00:35:23.120 I think

00:35:23.540 Kendi's

00:35:24.280 point is that

00:35:25.040 white applicants

00:35:25.760 were lying

00:35:26.400 not that it

00:35:28.080 worked

00:35:28.440 but that

00:35:29.180 they were

00:35:29.440 lying

00:35:29.780 so I

00:35:31.860 accept

00:35:32.500 his

00:35:33.000 clarification

00:35:33.800 if you

00:35:35.720 re-read

00:35:36.180 the tweets

00:35:36.720 it does

00:35:38.320 seem to

00:35:39.380 indicate he's

00:35:39.980 talking more

00:35:40.480 about the

00:35:40.900 lying

00:35:41.280 and does

00:35:42.300 not have

00:35:42.720 an opinion

00:35:43.120 about whether

00:35:43.700 it worked

00:35:44.240 so I

00:35:46.420 asked

00:35:46.700 what is

00:35:47.540 his opinion

00:35:48.020 did it

00:35:48.360 work

00:35:48.680 because I

00:35:49.880 think that's

00:35:50.200 important to

00:35:50.660 the story

00:35:51.020 right

00:35:51.280 and I

00:35:52.620 I'll give

00:35:53.160 him

00:35:53.400 I'll give

00:35:54.020 him credit

00:35:54.680 this far

00:35:57.000 that Jack

00:35:58.480 did extend

00:35:59.580 his point

00:36:00.300 in other

00:36:01.180 words Jack

00:36:01.740 attributed

00:36:03.160 more of a

00:36:04.120 point than

00:36:05.060 Kendi

00:36:05.620 made

00:36:06.120 and therefore

00:36:06.760 the criticism

00:36:07.480 is slightly

00:36:08.660 on a

00:36:09.120 related

00:36:10.080 very closely

00:36:10.800 related but

00:36:11.440 not quite

00:36:11.960 exactly the

00:36:12.580 same topic

00:36:13.180 you know

00:36:14.060 one is

00:36:14.460 did they

00:36:14.760 lie

00:36:15.100 and the

00:36:15.900 others

00:36:16.140 did it

00:36:16.460 work

00:36:16.800 slightly

00:36:18.060 different

00:36:18.520 but related

00:36:19.420 and I'll

00:36:21.020 give him

00:36:21.280 that I'll

00:36:21.920 give Kendi

00:36:22.360 that that

00:36:23.320 minor detail

00:36:24.000 but I

00:36:24.400 think that

00:36:24.720 he's

00:36:25.020 obligated

00:36:25.640 at this

00:36:26.040 point

00:36:26.240 because

00:36:26.520 it's a

00:36:26.840 public

00:36:27.100 exchange

00:36:27.760 I would

00:36:28.900 feel he's

00:36:29.300 obligated

00:36:29.760 to clarify

00:36:30.340 that in

00:36:32.200 addition to

00:36:32.980 the fact

00:36:34.520 that the

00:36:34.840 white people

00:36:35.260 lied

00:36:35.580 which I

00:36:35.940 think we

00:36:36.260 stipulate

00:36:36.760 right

00:36:37.140 nobody's

00:36:37.800 arguing

00:36:38.040 at that

00:36:38.300 point

00:36:38.520 does he

00:36:40.420 think that

00:36:40.880 there really

00:36:41.320 is no

00:36:41.740 advantage

00:36:42.140 to being

00:36:43.200 a person

00:36:43.580 of color

00:36:44.000 in 2021

00:36:45.080 what do

00:36:46.300 you think

00:36:46.600 to me

00:36:49.260 it looks

00:36:49.600 like it's

00:36:50.220 obviously

00:36:50.620 an advantage

00:36:51.140 I don't

00:36:51.500 I can't

00:36:52.080 even imagine

00:36:52.600 it not

00:36:53.000 be

00:36:53.220 true story

00:36:55.060 when I

00:36:55.740 was

00:36:56.680 I guess

00:36:58.000 17 or

00:36:58.660 18 I

00:36:59.100 was applying

00:37:00.000 for colleges

00:37:00.580 for the

00:37:01.000 first time

00:37:01.500 I filled

00:37:03.400 out a

00:37:04.960 document

00:37:05.360 on

00:37:05.860 ethnicity

00:37:06.740 and because

00:37:08.100 we had

00:37:08.540 been told

00:37:09.300 in my

00:37:09.980 family that

00:37:10.520 we were

00:37:10.880 part Native

00:37:11.560 American

00:37:12.100 not much

00:37:13.780 but we

00:37:15.100 were told

00:37:15.460 we had

00:37:15.800 some Native

00:37:16.180 American

00:37:16.680 it turns out

00:37:18.020 it was

00:37:18.240 not true

00:37:18.780 I have

00:37:19.680 as much

00:37:20.060 Native

00:37:20.320 American

00:37:20.740 as Elizabeth

00:37:21.420 Warren

00:37:21.820 which is

00:37:22.260 none

00:37:22.500 but apparently

00:37:23.800 it's fairly

00:37:24.260 common

00:37:24.800 and other

00:37:25.860 people have

00:37:26.280 the same

00:37:26.880 story

00:37:27.140 it was

00:37:27.760 fairly common

00:37:28.480 in my

00:37:29.160 generation

00:37:29.700 that families

00:37:31.140 were told

00:37:31.660 that they

00:37:31.980 were part

00:37:32.420 Native

00:37:32.720 American

00:37:33.160 and it

00:37:34.080 just wasn't

00:37:34.480 true

00:37:34.760 for some

00:37:35.980 reason

00:37:36.260 that was

00:37:37.020 like a

00:37:37.380 common

00:37:37.800 myth

00:37:38.240 within

00:37:38.960 families

00:37:39.480 and our

00:37:40.100 family was

00:37:40.540 one of them

00:37:41.040 so I had

00:37:42.240 my DNA

00:37:44.480 tested

00:37:45.000 I don't

00:37:45.360 have any

00:37:45.840 Native

00:37:46.220 American

00:37:46.640 blood

00:37:46.940 but at

00:37:48.860 the time

00:37:49.480 I thought

00:37:49.840 I did

00:37:50.280 and so I

00:37:51.200 thought

00:37:51.400 well wouldn't

00:37:51.800 it be

00:37:52.020 interesting

00:37:52.420 to fill

00:37:52.840 out this

00:37:53.180 application

00:37:53.720 and it

00:37:54.600 was some

00:37:55.020 generic

00:37:55.440 thing

00:37:55.760 that lots

00:37:56.360 of colleges

00:37:57.000 saw I

00:37:57.480 guess

00:37:57.660 I forget

00:37:58.600 what it

00:37:58.840 was

00:37:59.020 but I

00:37:59.520 put my

00:37:59.820 ethnicity

00:38:00.200 down

00:38:00.620 as

00:38:00.880 Native

00:38:01.140 American

00:38:01.600 and my

00:38:04.240 mailbox

00:38:04.620 blew up

00:38:05.800 with

00:38:07.460 offers

00:38:08.120 for

00:38:08.440 scholarships

00:38:08.940 and

00:38:09.480 immediate

00:38:09.860 acceptance

00:38:10.380 my

00:38:13.480 ethnicity

00:38:14.180 alone

00:38:14.780 got me

00:38:16.200 scholarship

00:38:17.660 offers

00:38:18.300 full ride

00:38:19.500 and

00:38:21.000 acceptance

00:38:21.620 that's it

00:38:23.620 they just

00:38:24.540 saw my

00:38:24.880 ethnicity

00:38:25.260 and said

00:38:25.700 yep

00:38:25.980 you're in

00:38:26.400 and probably

00:38:27.500 my high

00:38:28.520 school

00:38:28.720 grades

00:38:29.100 or something

00:38:29.520 now

00:38:30.560 that was

00:38:31.460 a long

00:38:31.720 time ago

00:38:32.200 things could

00:38:33.120 have changed

00:38:33.520 a lot

00:38:33.880 so I'm not

00:38:34.280 going to

00:38:34.500 suggest

00:38:34.860 things are

00:38:35.380 the same

00:38:35.700 but

00:38:36.540 and by

00:38:37.400 the way

00:38:37.720 just to

00:38:38.640 finish the

00:38:39.100 story

00:38:39.360 I did

00:38:40.520 not accept

00:38:41.180 any of the

00:38:41.660 offers that

00:38:42.180 were based

00:38:42.540 on that

00:38:42.880 so I did

00:38:44.240 not go to

00:38:44.760 college based

00:38:45.360 on a

00:38:45.640 fraud

00:38:45.920 but I did

00:38:47.160 fill out

00:38:47.540 a document

00:38:48.060 in a

00:38:49.140 let's say

00:38:49.540 cheeky way

00:38:50.420 that a

00:38:50.740 17 year

00:38:51.380 old might

00:38:51.860 and it was

00:38:53.120 just sort of

00:38:53.480 an experiment

00:38:53.960 I guess

00:38:54.460 and it

00:38:56.160 surprised me

00:38:56.740 I was

00:38:57.840 surprised

00:38:58.220 so let's

00:39:00.340 get to the

00:39:00.660 bottom of

00:39:00.980 that

00:39:01.120 I would

00:39:01.480 like to

00:39:01.760 hear it

00:39:02.060 if it

00:39:02.560 turns out

00:39:03.060 that I

00:39:03.960 and 100%

00:39:05.180 of every

00:39:05.740 white person

00:39:06.260 I've ever

00:39:06.660 met in my

00:39:07.080 life is

00:39:07.600 wrong

00:39:07.980 and that

00:39:09.600 actually white

00:39:10.280 people have

00:39:10.720 a big advantage

00:39:11.340 of getting

00:39:11.720 accepted into

00:39:12.420 college

00:39:12.740 if I'm

00:39:13.360 wrong about

00:39:13.800 that

00:39:14.160 I'd damn

00:39:15.760 well want

00:39:16.140 to know

00:39:16.520 wouldn't

00:39:17.360 you

00:39:17.560 could you

00:39:18.840 imagine if

00:39:19.380 you were

00:39:19.640 wrong about

00:39:20.080 that

00:39:20.340 this is a

00:39:22.100 good

00:39:22.320 exercise

00:39:23.660 to keep

00:39:25.080 you free

00:39:26.120 from at

00:39:26.600 least a

00:39:26.860 little bit

00:39:27.160 free from

00:39:27.660 cognitive

00:39:28.160 dissonance

00:39:28.680 because cognitive

00:39:30.260 dissonance

00:39:30.780 kicks in when

00:39:31.380 you find out

00:39:31.820 you're wrong

00:39:32.220 about something

00:39:32.800 so it

00:39:34.320 helps to

00:39:35.320 protect yourself

00:39:36.020 against that

00:39:36.620 to just

00:39:37.160 play it

00:39:38.100 through with

00:39:38.380 your mind

00:39:38.780 like what

00:39:39.240 would it

00:39:39.500 feel like

00:39:39.920 to be

00:39:40.180 wrong

00:39:40.440 about that

00:39:40.960 like something

00:39:42.340 really basic

00:39:43.200 that you

00:39:43.540 thought was

00:39:43.920 true about

00:39:44.420 the world

00:39:44.880 and what

00:39:45.500 if you're

00:39:45.800 wrong

00:39:46.100 it would

00:39:47.380 kind of

00:39:47.640 blow your 0.91

00:39:47.980 mind

00:39:48.200 wouldn't

00:39:48.400 it

00:39:48.600 and I

00:39:50.160 think

00:39:50.540 that if

00:39:51.380 you're an

00:39:51.720 honest

00:39:52.240 you know

00:39:53.380 participant

00:39:53.900 in these

00:39:54.400 conversations

00:39:55.020 you should

00:39:55.860 at least

00:39:56.260 give the

00:39:57.360 other side

00:39:57.840 the courtesy

00:39:58.420 of saying

00:39:59.340 you know

00:39:59.600 I could

00:39:59.860 be wrong

00:40:00.240 let's hear

00:40:01.520 what you

00:40:01.760 got

00:40:01.980 and I'm

00:40:02.740 going to

00:40:02.900 do that

00:40:03.240 in this

00:40:03.480 case

00:40:03.740 because

00:40:04.700 I don't

00:40:05.900 know if

00:40:06.080 you know

00:40:06.300 this but

00:40:06.700 Ibram

00:40:07.000 Kendi

00:40:07.220 is really

00:40:07.600 smart

00:40:07.980 did you

00:40:09.520 know that

00:40:09.960 did he

00:40:11.740 win a

00:40:12.220 MacArthur

00:40:12.620 award or

00:40:13.380 something like

00:40:13.680 that

00:40:13.840 but I

00:40:14.300 think he's

00:40:14.780 genuinely

00:40:15.680 like seriously

00:40:16.780 smart

00:40:17.260 so if he

00:40:18.640 says that

00:40:19.160 something is

00:40:19.640 true that I

00:40:20.180 think is not

00:40:20.640 true and

00:40:21.140 it happens to

00:40:21.880 be his

00:40:22.240 domain of

00:40:23.440 expertise

00:40:23.940 I could

00:40:25.200 be influenced

00:40:26.240 I could

00:40:27.460 change my

00:40:27.900 mind on

00:40:28.260 that

00:40:28.440 so

00:40:29.820 I'd like to

00:40:32.280 hear his

00:40:32.540 argument

00:40:32.820 sincerely

00:40:33.820 I think it'd

00:40:34.440 be interesting

00:40:34.860 whether it's a

00:40:35.800 good or bad

00:40:36.220 argument

00:40:36.540 I figure he's a

00:40:37.800 smart person

00:40:38.380 with something

00:40:39.460 to say

00:40:39.900 I'd like to

00:40:40.540 hear it

00:40:41.080 how much

00:40:41.740 would you

00:40:41.980 like to

00:40:42.280 hear me

00:40:43.260 having an

00:40:43.840 interview with

00:40:44.460 Ibram

00:40:45.320 Kendi

00:40:45.800 how much

00:40:47.920 would you

00:40:48.180 like that

00:40:48.640 I think

00:40:49.820 I think

00:40:50.500 some of

00:40:50.860 you would

00:40:51.080 hate it

00:40:51.400 as much

00:40:51.700 as you

00:40:51.960 liked it

00:40:52.420 because the

00:40:53.080 problem would

00:40:53.520 be I

00:40:53.880 would give

00:40:54.220 too much

00:40:54.560 respect to

00:40:55.160 his opinion

00:40:55.600 and you

00:40:56.140 don't like

00:40:56.500 his opinion

00:40:56.980 but I

00:40:58.460 wouldn't

00:40:58.740 interview

00:40:59.140 anybody

00:40:59.640 unless I

00:41:00.200 gave them

00:41:00.540 full respect

00:41:01.240 to their

00:41:02.140 opinion

00:41:02.700 otherwise

00:41:04.580 why would

00:41:05.040 I have

00:41:05.260 Mara

00:41:05.560 I'm not

00:41:06.280 going to

00:41:06.420 have somebody

00:41:06.820 on who's

00:41:07.120 just a

00:41:07.420 clown

00:41:07.680 right

00:41:07.980 I'm

00:41:09.080 going to

00:41:09.340 respect

00:41:09.680 the

00:41:09.880 opinion

00:41:10.140 or I'm

00:41:10.460 not

00:41:10.600 going to

00:41:10.840 have an

00:41:11.260 interview

00:41:11.560 would you

00:41:14.820 express

00:41:15.260 your opinion

00:41:15.920 of his

00:41:16.260 opinion

00:41:16.540 I just

00:41:16.900 did

00:41:17.160 I just

00:41:18.560 did

00:41:18.860 I'll give

00:41:20.780 you

00:41:20.920 well maybe

00:41:21.560 I can

00:41:21.840 extend that

00:41:22.380 I'll make

00:41:22.640 it larger

00:41:23.020 here's my

00:41:24.020 opinion

00:41:24.520 of I

00:41:26.520 guess the

00:41:26.920 the Kendi

00:41:27.480 view of

00:41:29.100 the world

00:41:29.440 I think he

00:41:31.040 would say

00:41:31.400 that the

00:41:31.900 structural or

00:41:32.780 systemic

00:41:33.260 racism is

00:41:34.260 real and

00:41:35.240 so do I

00:41:35.740 I would

00:41:37.360 say that

00:41:37.820 the place

00:41:38.240 that you

00:41:38.520 can fix

00:41:39.100 it

00:41:39.340 the place

00:41:40.140 that has

00:41:40.400 the biggest

00:41:40.760 lever is

00:41:41.980 in the

00:41:42.260 school

00:41:42.520 system

00:41:42.960 and that

00:41:44.180 we should

00:41:44.480 target that

00:41:45.180 collectively

00:41:45.840 because both

00:41:47.020 you know

00:41:47.520 basically every

00:41:48.700 ethnicity benefits

00:41:50.340 when you fix

00:41:50.900 the bad

00:41:51.280 schools

00:41:51.680 but the

00:41:53.000 black population

00:41:53.720 probably the

00:41:54.260 most just

00:41:54.940 because where

00:41:55.320 people live

00:41:55.920 and how bad

00:41:56.380 the schools

00:41:56.740 are

00:41:56.940 so we

00:41:58.260 can certainly

00:41:58.620 agree on

00:41:59.080 that

00:41:59.440 I mean

00:42:00.240 that's

00:42:00.420 pretty big

00:42:00.900 systemic

00:42:01.400 racism

00:42:01.920 I would

00:42:02.300 say

00:42:02.520 and the

00:42:04.520 other

00:42:04.700 arguments

00:42:05.100 about

00:42:05.340 systemic

00:42:05.800 racism

00:42:06.240 is that

00:42:06.920 anybody

00:42:07.520 who has

00:42:07.860 a head

00:42:08.160 start

00:42:08.600 has an

00:42:10.020 advantage

00:42:10.320 how do

00:42:11.540 you disagree

00:42:11.940 with that

00:42:12.460 do you

00:42:14.520 disagree

00:42:14.940 with the

00:42:15.700 notion

00:42:16.360 that if

00:42:16.900 you have

00:42:17.140 a head

00:42:17.440 start

00:42:17.840 it's an

00:42:19.120 advantage

00:42:19.540 who disagrees

00:42:21.700 with that

00:42:22.100 and I

00:42:23.440 would say

00:42:23.760 that you

00:42:24.520 know the

00:42:24.720 legacy of

00:42:25.320 slavery

00:42:25.640 did give

00:42:26.980 you know

00:42:27.420 some white

00:42:27.920 families a

00:42:28.720 head start

00:42:29.520 not all

00:42:30.360 of them

00:42:30.660 and as soon

00:42:31.400 as you say

00:42:31.740 it's about

00:42:32.080 all white

00:42:32.540 people it's

00:42:32.960 just stupid

00:42:33.480 right

00:42:35.600 if you were

00:42:36.220 born into

00:42:36.660 a poor

00:42:37.040 white family

00:42:37.660 the legacy

00:42:39.040 of being

00:42:40.140 white didn't 0.97

00:42:40.620 help you

00:42:40.940 as much

00:42:41.260 as it

00:42:41.520 should

00:42:41.680 have

00:42:41.860 but

00:42:43.180 now I

00:42:44.140 think he

00:42:44.420 would argue

00:42:44.800 that even

00:42:46.060 if you're

00:42:46.420 born a

00:42:46.880 poor white

00:42:47.440 person and

00:42:48.060 got no

00:42:48.820 specific

00:42:49.400 advantage

00:42:49.920 that the

00:42:51.020 system would

00:42:51.540 also give

00:42:52.060 you advantages

00:42:52.620 just for the

00:42:53.780 color of your

00:42:54.280 skin

00:42:54.520 that part

00:42:56.160 is part

00:42:57.380 true

00:42:57.660 and part

00:42:58.760 false

00:42:59.140 I do

00:43:00.620 believe that

00:43:01.140 there are

00:43:01.400 situations in

00:43:02.220 which being

00:43:03.420 white would 0.97

00:43:03.880 give you an

00:43:04.260 advantage

00:43:04.660 in American

00:43:05.420 society

00:43:06.000 for example

00:43:07.780 do you think

00:43:09.160 that people

00:43:09.680 suspect me

00:43:11.120 of shoplifting

00:43:11.880 as much

00:43:13.140 as a

00:43:14.260 black man

00:43:14.860 of the

00:43:15.220 same age

00:43:15.740 let's say

00:43:16.280 at the

00:43:16.720 same age

00:43:17.240 any age

00:43:17.820 do you

00:43:18.540 think I

00:43:18.860 would have

00:43:19.060 been suspected

00:43:19.800 of shoplifting

00:43:21.280 at the

00:43:21.820 same level

00:43:22.780 probably not

00:43:23.880 so that

00:43:24.440 would be

00:43:24.700 advantage

00:43:25.440 Scott

00:43:26.000 right

00:43:26.280 but

00:43:27.360 if I

00:43:28.160 were to

00:43:28.380 apply for

00:43:28.780 a job

00:43:29.240 at a

00:43:30.100 fortune 500

00:43:30.760 company

00:43:31.240 who would

00:43:33.000 yeah I know

00:43:34.300 I'm too old

00:43:34.760 for the

00:43:35.120 shoplifting

00:43:35.620 example

00:43:36.300 but if

00:43:36.960 I'm adjusting

00:43:37.660 it for my

00:43:38.280 younger self

00:43:38.960 you seem

00:43:43.660 pretty crafty

00:43:44.540 I don't know

00:43:45.740 what that means

00:43:46.240 is that good

00:43:47.000 or bad

00:43:47.380 do you sport

00:43:48.440 critical race

00:43:49.680 theory

00:43:50.220 no

00:43:52.820 critical race

00:43:53.660 theory is

00:43:54.400 just propaganda

00:43:55.180 and brainwashing 1.00

00:43:56.100 and

00:43:57.040 probably 80%

00:43:59.080 stupid 0.75

00:43:59.600 based on

00:44:01.080 20%

00:44:01.840 pretty good

00:44:02.420 stuff

00:44:02.900 so I

00:44:04.620 don't

00:44:04.860 disagree

00:44:05.280 with the

00:44:05.800 base

00:44:06.120 assumptions

00:44:06.720 most of

00:44:07.740 them

00:44:07.880 some of

00:44:08.480 them

00:44:08.520 I do

00:44:08.780 but the

00:44:09.520 base

00:44:09.760 assumptions

00:44:10.200 that there

00:44:10.680 is some

00:44:10.920 inequality

00:44:11.480 because of

00:44:12.480 head starts

00:44:13.180 etc

00:44:13.500 I just

00:44:14.320 disagree

00:44:14.800 that it's

00:44:15.260 important

00:44:15.760 and where

00:44:17.360 you would

00:44:17.740 start

00:44:18.200 now the

00:44:19.200 important

00:44:19.580 part

00:44:19.960 is if

00:44:20.880 the world

00:44:21.300 gives

00:44:21.580 everybody

00:44:22.060 you know

00:44:23.280 good

00:44:23.920 advantages

00:44:24.440 then it's

00:44:25.360 not

00:44:25.540 important

00:44:25.920 history

00:44:27.100 doesn't matter

00:44:27.760 because you

00:44:28.160 can't change

00:44:28.640 it

00:44:28.900 right

00:44:29.640 you're here

00:44:30.160 now

00:44:30.540 if you're

00:44:31.440 here now

00:44:31.900 with the

00:44:32.180 same

00:44:32.360 opportunity

00:44:32.900 as every

00:44:33.840 other poor

00:44:34.320 person

00:44:34.700 I feel

00:44:36.540 like I'm

00:44:36.960 done

00:44:37.220 you know

00:44:37.760 you don't

00:44:38.080 need to

00:44:38.560 talk anymore

00:44:39.080 about it

00:44:39.660 as long as

00:44:40.500 you gave

00:44:40.780 everybody an

00:44:41.320 opportunity

00:44:41.720 but as long

00:44:42.580 as the

00:44:42.800 school system

00:44:43.420 is garbage

00:44:44.060 for black

00:44:45.140 people

00:44:45.440 specifically

00:44:46.160 and others

00:44:47.560 but you know

00:44:48.340 more so

00:44:49.060 who doesn't

00:44:51.600 want to fix

00:44:51.980 that

00:44:52.240 who doesn't

00:44:53.600 want to fix

00:44:54.020 that

00:44:54.280 and that's

00:44:54.700 mostly the

00:44:55.320 teachers unions

00:44:56.080 are the problem

00:44:56.640 stop telling

00:44:59.940 people they're

00:45:00.640 screwed from

00:45:01.400 the get go

00:45:01.920 yeah you

00:45:02.560 don't want to

00:45:02.940 tell people

00:45:03.320 they're going

00:45:03.640 to lose

00:45:03.960 because the

00:45:04.540 way they

00:45:04.840 were born

00:45:05.260 that is

00:45:06.920 a bad

00:45:07.580 strategy

00:45:08.140 did you

00:45:10.640 look at

00:45:10.940 the Craig

00:45:11.640 Wright

00:45:12.040 now

00:45:13.160 why is

00:45:15.680 this is

00:45:16.600 this just

00:45:16.980 a Twitter

00:45:17.320 thing I've

00:45:18.040 not seen

00:45:18.440 anything in

00:45:19.060 the news

00:45:19.520 about Craig

00:45:20.340 Wright or

00:45:20.900 Satoshi

00:45:21.780 anything

00:45:22.380 is there

00:45:24.000 somebody tweet

00:45:25.120 me a news

00:45:25.680 article on

00:45:26.140 that I've

00:45:26.400 seen nothing

00:45:26.800 on that

00:45:27.220 in the

00:45:27.560 news

00:45:27.940 I've only

00:45:28.580 the only

00:45:29.200 place I've

00:45:29.600 ever seen

00:45:29.900 it is in

00:45:30.920 the comments

00:45:31.420 here

00:45:32.100 somebody's

00:45:36.360 saying most

00:45:36.700 of the

00:45:36.900 shop listeners

00:45:37.480 I've witnessed

00:45:38.280 running for

00:45:38.800 stores were

00:45:39.380 either young

00:45:39.800 white males

00:45:40.440 or white

00:45:41.980 women 1.00

00:45:42.300 in my

00:45:43.780 town

00:45:44.100 my town

00:45:45.460 is

00:45:45.780 upscale

00:45:47.380 town in

00:45:47.900 California

00:45:48.340 I would

00:45:49.640 say our

00:45:50.240 ethnic

00:45:50.920 breakdown

00:45:51.360 is probably

00:45:52.520 60%

00:45:55.060 white

00:45:55.900 30%

00:45:58.500 Indian

00:45:59.520 Asian

00:45:59.920 whatever

00:46:00.240 you know

00:46:00.820 however you

00:46:01.440 want to

00:46:01.660 slice that

00:46:02.260 and maybe

00:46:03.400 10%

00:46:04.000 black

00:46:04.380 something like

00:46:04.800 that

00:46:04.960 so that

00:46:05.480 would be

00:46:05.840 you know

00:46:06.240 the town

00:46:06.560 I live

00:46:06.900 in

00:46:07.200 and I

00:46:10.360 would say

00:46:10.660 nearly 100%

00:46:11.740 of the

00:46:12.120 shoplifters 1.00

00:46:12.800 are white

00:46:13.420 nearly 100%

00:46:15.940 because here

00:46:18.640 it's almost

00:46:20.240 like an

00:46:20.860 after school

00:46:21.620 sport

00:46:24.360 the kids

00:46:25.660 leave the

00:46:26.060 school

00:46:26.280 they go

00:46:26.620 to the

00:46:26.900 local

00:46:27.360 grocery

00:46:29.240 store

00:46:29.620 and they

00:46:30.120 shove 0.95

00:46:30.780 stuff in

00:46:31.320 their

00:46:31.460 pockets

00:46:31.780 and they

00:46:32.100 walk

00:46:32.300 out

00:46:32.580 because like

00:46:33.620 everywhere

00:46:33.920 else

00:46:34.300 the penalty

00:46:35.660 is so

00:46:36.320 small

00:46:36.780 or non-existent

00:46:38.240 that

00:46:39.280 yeah

00:46:40.000 right

00:46:40.560 I don't

00:46:40.900 live in

00:46:41.180 Oakland

00:46:41.400 you're

00:46:41.680 correct

00:46:41.980 so

00:46:43.680 I think

00:46:44.960 the

00:46:45.300 majority

00:46:45.920 of

00:46:46.280 shoplifters 1.00

00:46:46.940 is whatever

00:46:47.440 the majority

00:46:48.040 of people

00:46:48.480 in your

00:46:48.780 town

00:46:49.000 is

00:46:49.300 all right

00:46:55.880 free

00:46:56.500 range

00:46:56.780 shopping

00:46:57.860 people with

00:47:01.520 trauma

00:47:01.880 from neglect

00:47:02.680 or abuse

00:47:03.180 are more

00:47:03.520 likely to

00:47:04.080 steal

00:47:04.400 says

00:47:04.760 somebody

00:47:05.180 I don't

00:47:06.480 know

00:47:06.720 is there

00:47:07.580 any data

00:47:08.220 to back

00:47:08.560 that up

00:47:09.020 yeah

00:47:13.320 all right

00:47:14.720 far more

00:47:16.040 poor people

00:47:16.580 are criminals

00:47:17.120 well that

00:47:17.480 makes sense

00:47:18.040 they should

00:47:18.600 be

00:47:19.300 CVS

00:47:20.840 shut down

00:47:21.240 five stores

00:47:21.880 I don't

00:47:22.240 know if

00:47:22.460 that's real

00:47:22.980 or they

00:47:23.440 were shutting

00:47:23.900 down stores

00:47:24.420 in general

00:47:24.860 that CVS

00:47:26.840 story is a

00:47:27.260 little murky

00:47:27.780 because we

00:47:29.020 don't know

00:47:29.280 if they

00:47:29.480 were going

00:47:29.700 to shut 0.69

00:47:29.960 some stores

00:47:30.500 anyway

00:47:30.800 all right

00:47:33.280 that is

00:47:35.240 about what

00:47:35.780 I had to

00:47:36.260 talk about

00:47:36.660 today

00:47:37.060 and

00:47:38.320 do you

00:47:40.520 believe the

00:47:41.020 rich slaves

00:47:42.040 got to

00:47:42.400 keep their

00:47:42.780 money

00:47:43.060 well

00:47:44.200 here's

00:47:45.220 here's the

00:47:45.940 provocative

00:47:46.560 way that

00:47:47.440 you would

00:47:47.800 analyze

00:47:48.520 reparations

00:47:49.640 I've said

00:47:50.360 this before

00:47:50.900 but if

00:47:51.360 somebody's

00:47:51.700 new to

00:47:51.960 it

00:47:52.180 if you

00:47:54.940 were going

00:47:55.280 to do

00:47:55.620 an honest

00:47:56.280 economic

00:47:56.960 analysis

00:47:57.480 of reparations

00:47:58.360 what would

00:47:58.980 you compare

00:47:59.680 the

00:48:00.900 let's say

00:48:02.020 the black

00:48:02.640 experience

00:48:03.680 and what

00:48:04.340 they got

00:48:04.760 and didn't

00:48:05.120 get

00:48:05.380 through

00:48:06.200 slavery

00:48:06.700 etc

00:48:07.000 what would

00:48:07.980 you compare

00:48:08.380 it to

00:48:08.800 if you

00:48:10.200 compare it

00:48:10.640 to the

00:48:10.900 white people

00:48:11.460 in America

00:48:12.400 which is

00:48:13.100 the way

00:48:13.600 it's being

00:48:13.900 done

00:48:14.200 then it

00:48:15.040 looks like

00:48:15.340 there's a

00:48:15.720 gigantic

00:48:16.100 disparity

00:48:16.740 and very

00:48:17.620 unfair

00:48:17.940 but if

00:48:19.540 you compared

00:48:20.040 it to

00:48:20.420 the actual

00:48:21.060 alternative

00:48:21.660 which is

00:48:22.860 never being

00:48:23.440 slaves

00:48:23.960 the actual

00:48:25.200 comparison

00:48:25.780 would be

00:48:26.480 to people

00:48:27.280 who stayed

00:48:27.740 in Africa

00:48:28.240 and just

00:48:29.220 continued

00:48:29.760 living their

00:48:30.360 normal life

00:48:30.960 in Africa

00:48:31.360 that's the

00:48:32.740 comparison

00:48:33.140 for financial

00:48:33.920 reasons

00:48:34.360 now for

00:48:35.660 abuse

00:48:37.460 and

00:48:38.620 you know

00:48:39.400 the slavery

00:48:40.180 part

00:48:40.600 that of

00:48:41.780 course

00:48:42.060 you know

00:48:42.820 you could

00:48:43.120 you could

00:48:43.520 make an

00:48:43.940 argument

00:48:44.180 for

00:48:44.520 compensation

00:48:45.500 for that

00:48:46.300 but I

00:48:47.160 don't know

00:48:47.600 that you

00:48:47.860 could make

00:48:48.260 a rational

00:48:49.740 argument

00:48:50.160 that black 1.00

00:48:52.140 people were

00:48:52.760 were stolen

00:48:54.000 from

00:48:54.460 except for

00:48:56.280 their freedom

00:48:56.860 I mean

00:48:57.420 that's

00:48:58.080 obviously

00:48:58.840 bigger than

00:48:59.320 money

00:48:59.580 but

00:49:00.520 financially

00:49:01.840 I don't

00:49:02.200 think it's

00:49:02.560 a stealing

00:49:03.220 situation

00:49:03.860 because you

00:49:04.800 would compare

00:49:05.240 it to what

00:49:05.620 their alternative

00:49:06.180 was which

00:49:06.880 may be even

00:49:07.800 worse

00:49:08.160 not worse

00:49:09.280 than slavery

00:49:09.780 but once

00:49:11.380 once slavery

00:49:12.180 was ended

00:49:12.740 if you would

00:49:13.520 have to compare

00:49:14.100 them through

00:49:14.540 history

00:49:14.960 I don't know

00:49:15.900 who would

00:49:16.220 do better

00:49:16.600 would a

00:49:17.700 would a

00:49:18.080 black man

00:49:18.740 in 1965

00:49:20.160 America

00:49:21.480 have more

00:49:22.780 or less

00:49:23.440 money and

00:49:25.160 freedom

00:49:25.460 than the

00:49:26.160 African

00:49:26.680 source

00:49:29.300 tribe

00:49:30.600 or whatever

00:49:30.980 it was

00:49:31.360 for wherever

00:49:31.800 he came

00:49:32.160 culture

00:49:32.640 I don't

00:49:33.600 know

00:49:33.820 but obviously

00:49:37.280 you could

00:49:37.600 make the

00:49:37.920 argument that

00:49:38.500 the slavery

00:49:39.520 itself requires

00:49:40.400 reparations

00:49:41.000 independent of

00:49:42.100 any finances

00:49:42.880 now I'm not

00:49:45.160 I'm not saying

00:49:45.920 it's a good

00:49:46.300 idea but you

00:49:46.840 could make

00:49:47.180 the argument

00:49:47.880 and I

00:49:48.460 think it

00:49:49.260 has been

00:49:49.580 made

00:49:49.800 and yes

00:49:52.860 black Africans

00:49:53.640 enslaved

00:49:54.180 other Africans

00:49:54.900 yeah slavery

00:49:55.900 is a universal

00:49:56.960 historical

00:49:57.680 thing

00:49:58.420 everybody

00:49:58.900 enslaved

00:49:59.360 everybody

00:49:59.780 basically

00:50:00.640 everybody

00:50:01.140 who could

00:50:01.880 enslave

00:50:02.300 somebody

00:50:02.660 did

00:50:02.940 that's

00:50:04.600 pretty much

00:50:05.040 the whole

00:50:05.320 thing

00:50:05.540 if you

00:50:05.920 could

00:50:06.260 well you

00:50:07.240 did

00:50:07.540 yes

00:50:12.420 and as

00:50:12.860 as the

00:50:13.780 comments are

00:50:14.200 saying it's

00:50:14.560 more than

00:50:14.860 slavery

00:50:15.300 because of

00:50:16.180 the Jim Crow 0.94

00:50:16.800 laws and

00:50:17.420 the discrimination

00:50:18.140 through life

00:50:18.720 yeah I

00:50:19.420 definitely

00:50:20.360 empathize

00:50:22.400 with the

00:50:22.760 argument

00:50:23.080 that they

00:50:25.160 were suffering

00:50:25.680 however

00:50:26.660 most of

00:50:28.380 the people

00:50:28.740 who suffered

00:50:29.460 you know

00:50:31.000 the worst

00:50:31.820 abuses

00:50:32.340 have already

00:50:33.040 passed

00:50:33.520 but there

00:50:34.500 are plenty

00:50:34.760 of people

00:50:35.080 alive

00:50:35.460 who went

00:50:36.460 through

00:50:36.740 you know

00:50:37.120 the worst

00:50:38.640 of the

00:50:38.940 earlier

00:50:39.240 discrimination

00:50:39.840 in the

00:50:41.180 last hundred

00:50:41.640 years

00:50:42.000 if Kendi

00:50:47.140 is correct

00:50:47.760 why aren't

00:50:48.380 minority

00:50:48.860 applicants

00:50:49.340 lying to

00:50:49.960 say they

00:50:50.320 are white

00:50:50.740 I can answer

00:50:51.500 that

00:50:51.760 I can

00:50:52.300 answer

00:50:52.560 it for

00:50:52.900 Kendi

00:50:53.220 if his

00:50:54.640 belief is

00:50:55.220 that the

00:50:55.580 white

00:50:56.040 applicants

00:50:56.560 are wrong

00:50:57.480 that they

00:50:59.360 don't get

00:50:59.720 and they

00:51:00.180 don't get

00:51:00.500 any advantage

00:51:00.980 from saying

00:51:01.560 they're people

00:51:02.180 of color

00:51:02.600 it means

00:51:03.440 that students

00:51:04.460 can be wrong

00:51:05.900 about what

00:51:06.440 works and

00:51:06.860 what doesn't

00:51:07.380 so that's

00:51:08.220 your answer

00:51:08.620 you're saying

00:51:09.700 why aren't

00:51:10.120 the students

00:51:10.640 acting rationally

00:51:11.660 if they

00:51:12.080 could get

00:51:12.400 an advantage

00:51:12.920 by doing

00:51:13.560 X

00:51:13.960 and I'm

00:51:14.640 saying his

00:51:15.520 argument is

00:51:16.100 that the

00:51:16.420 students are

00:51:16.860 not acting

00:51:17.360 rationally

00:51:17.880 they're acting

00:51:19.100 poorly

00:51:19.540 but I

00:51:21.380 believe his

00:51:21.880 argument would

00:51:22.400 be they're

00:51:22.740 not acting

00:51:23.340 in their

00:51:23.700 best interest

00:51:24.320 they just

00:51:25.060 don't realize

00:51:25.620 it and

00:51:26.640 that would

00:51:26.900 apply to

00:51:27.360 any kid

00:51:28.380 hello all

00:51:31.780 you clankers

00:51:32.460 now do

00:51:34.360 you clankers

00:51:34.980 come over

00:51:35.480 because there

00:51:38.400 was a retweet

00:51:39.140 or another

00:51:39.880 another podcast

00:51:41.100 ended

00:51:41.480 oh it's a

00:51:48.220 raid from

00:51:48.900 Stixenhammer

00:51:49.980 what does

00:51:50.620 that mean

00:51:50.940 a raid

00:51:51.420 does that

00:51:52.720 mean that

00:51:53.240 he tweeted

00:51:53.980 something

00:51:54.500 and so

00:51:54.960 you all

00:51:55.240 came over

00:51:55.600 here

00:51:55.820 or does

00:51:56.900 it mean

00:51:57.120 that his

00:51:57.440 program

00:51:57.820 just ended

00:51:58.300 and you're

00:51:58.920 coming to

00:51:59.260 another

00:51:59.480 program

00:51:59.880 I don't

00:52:01.380 know what

00:52:01.760 any of that

00:52:02.100 means

00:52:02.440 just saying

00:52:03.680 hi

00:52:03.940 hi

00:52:04.920 oh the

00:52:09.960 clankers are

00:52:10.620 liking the

00:52:11.160 stream

00:52:11.460 Stix is live

00:52:13.340 and he sends

00:52:13.920 them

00:52:14.100 oh okay

00:52:14.600 well that

00:52:16.280 is

00:52:16.560 that is

00:52:18.500 very nice

00:52:19.140 of him

00:52:19.460 tell him

00:52:20.220 I said

00:52:20.520 thanks

00:52:20.940 and

00:52:22.180 all right

00:52:26.760 good

00:52:27.140 good to

00:52:28.940 know

00:52:29.140 all right

00:52:29.780 thanks for

00:52:30.160 watching

00:52:30.440 we didn't

00:52:31.700 have too

00:52:32.060 much news

00:52:32.660 today

00:52:33.040 because

00:52:33.540 maybe

00:52:34.180 because

00:52:34.480 it's

00:52:34.600 Halloween

00:52:34.860 so go

00:52:35.780 out and

00:52:35.940 have a

00:52:36.340 I will

00:52:38.080 talk about

00:52:38.700 decentral

00:52:40.080 land

00:52:40.680 I see

00:52:42.900 in the

00:52:43.160 comments

00:52:43.480 I'm being

00:52:43.800 prompted

00:52:44.140 to do

00:52:44.460 that

00:52:44.640 but not

00:52:45.140 today

00:52:45.440 but I

00:52:46.660 will talk

00:52:47.000 about that

00:52:47.420 and

00:52:48.860 did I

00:52:51.320 mention

00:52:51.560 the

00:52:51.800 Southwest

00:52:52.180 pilot

00:52:52.920 oh there

00:52:54.060 was a

00:52:54.340 Southwest

00:52:54.660 pilot

00:52:55.060 for

00:52:55.400 saying

00:52:56.800 let's

00:52:57.900 go

00:52:58.060 Brandon

00:52:58.480 I guess

00:52:59.560 he got

00:52:59.780 fired

00:53:00.080 you know

00:53:00.760 I don't

00:53:01.120 disagree

00:53:01.460 with that

00:53:01.880 I don't

00:53:02.740 disagree

00:53:03.060 with that

00:53:03.380 firing

00:53:03.680 I don't

00:53:04.300 think

00:53:04.480 that firing 0.87

00:53:05.100 was

00:53:05.800 inappropriate

00:53:07.220 I'm sorry

00:53:10.280 I think

00:53:11.840 the employer

00:53:12.300 can do

00:53:12.680 anything

00:53:12.960 they want

00:53:13.540 in protecting

00:53:14.580 their brand

00:53:15.260 and if

00:53:16.100 they thought

00:53:16.440 that was

00:53:16.720 bad for

00:53:17.160 the brand

00:53:17.540 they might

00:53:17.940 be right

00:53:18.300 they might

00:53:18.660 be wrong

00:53:19.060 but it's

00:53:20.240 their call

00:53:21.080 was that

00:53:22.060 good for

00:53:22.480 the brand

00:53:22.840 or bad

00:53:23.220 for the

00:53:23.480 brand

00:53:23.700 and I

00:53:24.280 don't

00:53:24.400 think

00:53:24.620 putting

00:53:24.880 politics

00:53:25.400 on a

00:53:25.720 plane

00:53:26.060 is good

00:53:26.960 for

00:53:27.140 safety

00:53:27.560 think

00:53:29.200 about

00:53:29.440 it

00:53:29.680 what

00:53:30.560 happens

00:53:30.980 when

00:53:31.260 you hear

00:53:31.580 a

00:53:31.700 political

00:53:32.140 something

00:53:32.920 obviously

00:53:34.540 political

00:53:35.180 from your

00:53:36.080 pilot

00:53:36.460 do you

00:53:38.100 think that

00:53:38.640 gets the

00:53:39.040 passengers

00:53:39.520 talking to

00:53:40.120 each other

00:53:40.520 and arguing

00:53:42.180 about whether

00:53:42.760 that was

00:53:43.300 right or

00:53:44.040 wrong

00:53:44.320 and suddenly

00:53:45.400 the plane

00:53:46.000 figures out

00:53:46.660 who's a

00:53:47.720 Trump supporter

00:53:48.320 and who's

00:53:49.500 not

00:53:49.780 and then you

00:53:50.660 have to be

00:53:51.100 on a flight

00:53:51.500 together for

00:53:52.140 however long

00:53:53.120 I think

00:53:54.560 it was

00:53:54.720 dangerous

00:53:55.140 I think

00:53:56.420 it was

00:53:56.660 literally

00:53:57.060 a safety

00:53:57.640 problem

00:53:58.140 to interject

00:53:59.340 politics

00:54:00.020 in 2021

00:54:00.860 on a

00:54:02.120 plane

00:54:02.500 where people

00:54:03.400 are in

00:54:04.280 a confined

00:54:05.000 space

00:54:05.420 so I'm

00:54:06.460 going to

00:54:06.640 back the

00:54:07.120 airlines

00:54:07.660 for firing

00:54:09.440 any pilot

00:54:10.080 who makes

00:54:10.560 a blatant

00:54:11.500 one-sided

00:54:13.240 political

00:54:13.940 statement

00:54:14.420 sorry

00:54:17.340 because remember

00:54:19.920 the airline

00:54:20.380 has rights

00:54:20.920 too

00:54:21.260 I'm very

00:54:23.400 much in

00:54:23.780 favor of

00:54:24.320 free speech

00:54:24.940 and of

00:54:25.340 course

00:54:25.600 especially

00:54:26.400 provocative

00:54:27.020 free speech

00:54:27.700 but you

00:54:28.540 don't get

00:54:28.880 to do it

00:54:29.260 everywhere

00:54:29.680 right

00:54:30.660 you don't

00:54:31.040 get to

00:54:31.760 embarrass

00:54:32.200 your employer

00:54:32.800 or create

00:54:33.620 safety problems

00:54:34.600 I would say

00:54:35.880 that a

00:54:36.440 pilot

00:54:36.820 interjecting

00:54:37.940 let's go

00:54:39.900 Brandon

00:54:40.340 was similar

00:54:42.760 not completely

00:54:44.100 the same

00:54:44.780 I know

00:54:45.360 there are

00:54:45.720 differences

00:54:46.100 similar

00:54:47.340 to yelling

00:54:48.600 fire in a

00:54:49.320 crowded theater

00:54:50.000 because the

00:54:51.980 risk of

00:54:53.080 violence

00:54:53.500 from that

00:54:54.080 statement

00:54:54.560 in an

00:54:55.800 enclosed

00:54:56.060 space

00:54:56.580 where people

00:54:57.020 can't just

00:54:57.480 leave

00:54:57.880 is non-zero

00:54:59.740 it's not

00:55:00.820 zero

00:55:01.240 I mean

00:55:02.120 the fire

00:55:03.020 example would

00:55:03.580 be more

00:55:04.160 dangerous

00:55:04.580 I think

00:55:04.980 but it's

00:55:05.700 not zero

00:55:06.220 and I

00:55:07.040 can see

00:55:07.520 the airline

00:55:07.980 saying

00:55:08.400 we want

00:55:09.100 our safety

00:55:09.540 record to

00:55:10.760 be spotless

00:55:12.100 do you

00:55:13.200 want your

00:55:13.640 airplane to

00:55:15.280 be casual

00:55:15.920 about safety

00:55:16.700 you don't

00:55:19.360 right

00:55:19.620 it's the

00:55:20.600 same

00:55:20.780 let me

00:55:22.100 give an

00:55:22.360 analogy

00:55:22.780 that you

00:55:23.100 can hate

00:55:23.500 analogies

00:55:26.260 are not

00:55:26.540 persuasive

00:55:27.060 because you'll

00:55:27.600 just argue

00:55:28.040 about the

00:55:28.420 analogy

00:55:28.760 but it's

00:55:31.020 too much

00:55:31.360 fun

00:55:31.640 so I'm

00:55:32.500 going to

00:55:32.640 do it

00:55:32.840 anyway

00:55:33.080 what did

00:55:34.480 gun owners

00:55:35.020 say when

00:55:35.680 Alec Baldwin

00:55:36.300 supporters

00:55:37.960 said

00:55:38.420 well it

00:55:39.620 may not

00:55:40.020 be Alec

00:55:40.800 Baldwin's

00:55:41.280 fault

00:55:41.560 because it

00:55:42.220 was this

00:55:42.620 armorer

00:55:43.680 who handed

00:55:44.140 him the

00:55:44.460 gun

00:55:44.660 so it's

00:55:45.080 maybe that

00:55:45.540 other

00:55:45.740 person's

00:55:46.120 fault

00:55:46.340 what does

00:55:47.600 every

00:55:47.980 good

00:55:49.480 gun

00:55:49.980 owner

00:55:50.260 say

00:55:50.600 I'm

00:55:52.000 sorry

00:55:52.260 that's

00:55:52.720 an

00:55:52.960 absolute

00:55:53.420 it's

00:55:54.440 an

00:55:54.560 absolute

00:55:55.020 if it

00:55:55.800 was in

00:55:56.060 his

00:55:56.220 hand

00:55:56.600 it's

00:55:57.560 his

00:55:57.700 responsibility

00:55:58.400 yes we

00:55:59.840 hear your

00:56:00.180 argument

00:56:00.460 and we're

00:56:01.080 not listening

00:56:01.600 to it

00:56:01.920 it's an

00:56:02.260 absolute

00:56:02.660 we're not

00:56:03.920 going to be

00:56:04.320 rational about

00:56:05.000 this

00:56:05.300 did you hear

00:56:05.860 the part

00:56:06.200 where it's

00:56:06.480 an absolute

00:56:06.960 has to be

00:56:07.980 an absolute

00:56:08.400 because the

00:56:09.380 moment you

00:56:09.760 say there's

00:56:10.220 an exception

00:56:10.820 to gun

00:56:12.160 safety

00:56:12.600 somebody gets

00:56:13.840 killed

00:56:14.180 just like

00:56:15.380 the Alec

00:56:15.760 Baldwin

00:56:16.040 situation

00:56:16.680 that's why

00:56:17.800 there's no

00:56:18.320 exceptions

00:56:18.840 because the

00:56:19.800 moment you

00:56:20.360 make that

00:56:20.700 exception

00:56:21.060 somebody dies

00:56:21.820 airline

00:56:23.980 safety

00:56:24.520 should you

00:56:26.220 make

00:56:26.420 exceptions

00:56:26.900 yeah we're

00:56:28.240 really big

00:56:28.740 on airline

00:56:29.200 safety

00:56:29.700 but you

00:56:30.880 know

00:56:31.100 we'll make

00:56:31.720 an exception

00:56:32.240 you okay

00:56:33.960 with that

00:56:34.380 no I

00:56:35.560 think

00:56:35.760 airline

00:56:36.100 safety

00:56:36.620 and

00:56:37.540 and firearm

00:56:38.540 safety

00:56:39.060 should be

00:56:40.300 absolutes

00:56:41.060 and every

00:56:42.120 time you

00:56:42.480 think that

00:56:42.880 there should

00:56:43.200 be an

00:56:43.420 exception

00:56:43.740 to it

00:56:44.160 you're

00:56:44.360 wrong

00:56:44.580 and the

00:56:46.480 and the

00:56:46.740 pilot

00:56:46.980 situation

00:56:47.480 goes into

00:56:47.980 that

00:56:48.160 now I

00:56:48.740 think

00:56:49.080 I hate

00:56:50.260 the fact

00:56:50.620 that he

00:56:50.860 got fired

00:56:51.380 like from

00:56:52.240 a on a

00:56:52.780 human level

00:56:53.540 that just

00:56:55.040 sucks

00:56:55.420 right

00:56:56.040 he was just

00:56:57.080 being

00:56:57.600 interesting

00:56:58.740 and fun

00:56:59.420 it was a

00:57:00.480 bad decision

00:57:01.220 it had

00:57:02.400 nothing to

00:57:02.860 do with

00:57:03.160 his flying

00:57:03.840 ability

00:57:04.360 I hope

00:57:06.100 he gets

00:57:06.340 another job

00:57:06.860 and he's

00:57:07.120 fine

00:57:07.360 but I

00:57:09.200 kind of

00:57:09.560 back

00:57:09.880 I back

00:57:10.480 southwest

00:57:10.880 on this

00:57:11.420 I think

00:57:12.200 treating

00:57:12.540 safety as

00:57:13.200 an absolute

00:57:13.720 is good

00:57:14.820 for the

00:57:15.120 brand

00:57:15.500 good for

00:57:16.000 the passengers

00:57:16.580 and good

00:57:17.700 for the

00:57:17.960 world

00:57:18.220 it just

00:57:19.160 happened to

00:57:19.460 be really

00:57:19.780 bad for

00:57:20.200 one pilot

00:57:20.880 and I

00:57:21.620 don't think

00:57:22.120 it's fair

00:57:22.460 to him

00:57:22.780 but the

00:57:23.840 world

00:57:24.000 isn't fair

00:57:24.500 it's not

00:57:25.480 a fair

00:57:25.740 world

00:57:26.120 right

00:57:26.660 and

00:57:27.020 unfortunately

00:57:27.660 this went

00:57:28.380 his

00:57:28.660 the wrong

00:57:29.400 way

00:57:29.680 somebody

00:57:32.600 somebody says

00:57:32.840 I disagree

00:57:33.360 with your

00:57:33.760 framing

00:57:34.120 as a

00:57:34.580 safety

00:57:34.860 issue

00:57:35.220 that

00:57:35.700 doesn't

00:57:35.980 matter

00:57:36.220 really

00:57:36.540 it

00:57:37.220 doesn't

00:57:37.440 matter

00:57:37.760 because

00:57:38.560 it

00:57:38.680 doesn't

00:57:38.940 matter

00:57:39.120 if

00:57:39.300 you

00:57:39.500 think

00:57:39.740 it's

00:57:39.940 not

00:57:40.120 a

00:57:40.260 safety

00:57:40.520 issue

00:57:40.900 the

00:57:41.920 fact

00:57:42.180 that

00:57:42.480 I'm

00:57:42.900 a

00:57:43.020 reasonable

00:57:43.360 person

00:57:43.900 who

00:57:44.120 thinks

00:57:44.400 it

00:57:44.600 is

00:57:45.300 a

00:57:45.460 safety

00:57:45.700 issue

00:57:46.000 that

00:57:47.260 means

00:57:47.520 that

00:57:47.720 southwest

00:57:48.100 is

00:57:48.700 completely

00:57:49.280 reasonable

00:57:49.820 in

00:57:50.040 saying

00:57:50.240 you know

00:57:50.460 people

00:57:50.740 are

00:57:50.920 going

00:57:51.040 to

00:57:51.160 think

00:57:51.400 it's

00:57:51.560 a

00:57:51.700 safety

00:57:51.940 issue

00:57:52.280 even

00:57:53.500 if

00:57:53.780 we

00:57:53.960 don't

00:57:55.080 because

00:57:55.520 remember

00:57:55.900 safety

00:57:56.840 is an

00:57:57.160 absolute

00:57:57.600 so

00:57:58.600 you

00:57:58.720 have

00:57:58.900 to

00:57:59.040 treat

00:57:59.360 it

00:57:59.640 like

00:58:00.960 it's

00:58:01.340 an

00:58:01.480 absolute

00:58:01.800 and

00:58:03.260 so

00:58:03.420 they

00:58:03.560 can't

00:58:03.800 say

00:58:03.940 well

00:58:04.340 you know

00:58:04.680 this

00:58:04.880 case

00:58:05.260 all right

00:58:08.480 this is

00:58:09.420 oh

00:58:09.780 was he

00:58:10.280 not

00:58:10.480 fired

00:58:10.800 what

00:58:11.240 happened

00:58:11.500 to him

00:58:11.820 I'm

00:58:13.220 getting

00:58:13.420 a

00:58:13.700 correction

00:58:14.160 here

00:58:14.520 on

00:58:14.700 YouTube

00:58:15.000 was

00:58:15.760 he

00:58:15.880 not

00:58:16.100 fired

00:58:16.460 yeah

00:58:20.820 and it

00:58:21.140 doesn't

00:58:21.440 matter

00:58:21.660 if

00:58:21.900 it

00:58:22.020 didn't

00:58:22.200 start

00:58:22.500 any

00:58:22.700 fights

00:58:23.160 what

00:58:23.840 matters

00:58:24.200 is

00:58:24.540 any

00:58:24.800 reasonable

00:58:25.240 person

00:58:25.620 would

00:58:25.780 have

00:58:25.880 said

00:58:26.040 this

00:58:26.260 could

00:58:26.440 cause

00:58:26.720 trouble

00:58:27.040 a

00:58:28.500 reasonable

00:58:28.900 person

00:58:29.380 could

00:58:29.720 say

00:58:29.920 this

00:58:30.180 might

00:58:30.440 cause

00:58:30.740 trouble

00:58:31.040 and

00:58:31.200 that's

00:58:31.680 it

00:58:31.860 that's

00:58:32.120 the whole

00:58:32.340 story

00:58:32.660 if a

00:58:33.380 reasonable

00:58:33.700 person

00:58:34.140 could

00:58:34.320 say

00:58:34.500 you know

00:58:34.820 this

00:58:35.020 could

00:58:35.320 cause

00:58:35.560 a

00:58:35.680 problem

00:58:35.980 they

00:58:37.660 got

00:58:37.820 to

00:58:37.900 act

00:58:38.100 on

00:58:38.260 it

00:58:39.020 what

00:58:44.380 if

00:58:44.520 he

00:58:44.600 made

00:58:44.820 fun

00:58:45.100 of

00:58:45.240 the

00:58:45.360 flat

00:58:45.620 earth

00:58:45.860 well

00:58:46.140 I

00:58:46.420 don't

00:58:46.520 know

00:58:46.700 I'm

00:58:47.100 not

00:58:47.240 sure

00:58:47.400 that

00:58:47.640 that

00:58:48.880 hypothetical

00:58:49.400 helps

00:58:50.100 us

00:58:50.360 the

00:58:51.720 flight

00:58:51.920 was

00:58:52.080 on

00:58:52.220 the

00:58:52.320 ground

00:58:52.700 well

00:58:53.000 that

00:58:53.120 doesn't

00:58:53.340 matter

00:58:53.540 does

00:58:53.740 it

00:58:54.320 the

00:58:55.200 flight

00:58:55.360 was

00:58:55.540 on

00:58:55.660 the

00:58:55.740 ground

00:58:56.000 but

00:58:56.180 it

00:58:56.280 was

00:58:56.380 going

00:58:56.540 to

00:58:56.620 take

00:58:56.840 off

00:58:57.100 right

00:58:57.340 or

00:58:58.980 had

00:58:59.180 it

00:58:59.300 already

00:58:59.540 landed

00:58:59.940 in

00:59:00.740 any

00:59:00.960 case

00:59:01.220 they're

00:59:01.680 still

00:59:02.020 confined

00:59:02.980 in

00:59:03.200 that

00:59:03.360 space

00:59:03.680 so

00:59:03.820 it's

00:59:03.940 still

00:59:04.100 dangerous

00:59:04.540 shut up

00:59:10.560 and fly

00:59:10.880 the

00:59:11.040 plane

00:59:11.300 all right

00:59:12.700 that's

00:59:13.420 all

00:59:13.660 and I

00:59:14.500 will

00:59:14.740 talk

00:59:14.980 to

00:59:15.120 you

00:59:15.380 tomorrow

00:59:16.120 have

00:59:16.320 a

00:59:16.420 great

00:59:16.600 Halloween

00:59:17.400 everybody

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 31, 2021

Episode 1547 Scott Adams： I'll Tell You About the Frightening News Today. Join Me If You Dare

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript