Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1547 Scott Adams： I'll Tell You About the Frightening News Today. Join Me If You Dare

00:00:00.380 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that's ever happened in the history of the universe,

00:00:07.760 metaverse, and every other verse.

00:00:10.480 All of them, best thing.

00:00:12.780 And you are smart enough and sexy enough to be here at the right time.

00:00:18.240 Yeah, and some of you are even prepared.

00:00:20.920 Others, still working on it, still working on it.

00:00:23.460 But if you'd like to crank it up a notch, and I think you do, don't you?

00:00:28.680 Yeah, yeah, why not?

00:00:31.200 Because as I learned in economics class in college,

00:00:35.340 my professor explained the most important thing I've ever heard in my life.

00:00:39.960 It's about money.

00:00:41.320 And I'm going to give you this important lesson,

00:00:44.200 which, in a way, summarizes four years of my college education.

00:00:50.540 It goes like this.

00:00:52.100 When it comes to money, more is better.

00:00:55.060 And when it comes to the simultaneous sip, more is better, too.

00:01:01.140 And all you need for more is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen jug or a glass,

00:01:05.720 a vessel of any kind.

00:01:07.520 No holes in the bottom.

00:01:08.980 No holes.

00:01:10.840 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:11.980 I like coffee.

00:01:13.900 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:01:17.240 the dopamine here today,

00:01:18.420 the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:21.100 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:01:23.820 It's going to happen now.

00:01:25.120 Watch what it does to your antibodies.

00:01:26.800 Watch this.

00:01:27.420 Watch this.

00:01:27.920 Go.

00:01:32.660 Whoa!

00:01:34.600 Is it my imagination,

00:01:36.060 or am I regrowing hair on the top of my head?

00:01:38.880 I mean, it feels like it.

00:01:40.020 The antibodies are going nuts now.

00:01:41.540 Now, here's a question for you.

00:01:46.080 Does my repeated reference to the improvement in your antibodies

00:01:51.240 actually cause anybody's antibodies to improve?

00:01:55.700 What do you think?

00:01:57.960 I've taught you much about persuasion and about the human body.

00:02:02.480 Speculate, if you will.

00:02:04.420 The fact that you come here, and we have some connection because you're here,

00:02:07.840 do you think they're reminding you that the simultaneous sip will improve your antibodies?

00:02:14.480 Do you think it will increase them?

00:02:17.840 I think so.

00:02:19.640 You know, your mileage might vary, but I think so.

00:02:24.120 All right, I just saw this post.

00:02:26.420 I think this was on Instagram, but originally on Twitter.

00:02:29.000 Somebody put it on Instagram.

00:02:30.740 By Neil Brennan.

00:02:31.860 I think this is the tweet that sums up everything for the last six years in one tweet.

00:02:41.580 Are you ready?

00:02:42.260 Remember, it's Halloween.

00:02:44.040 And he tweets,

00:02:45.180 Somewhere, a white person is planning a costume for tonight that's going to F up their whole future.

00:02:51.260 No, he didn't.

00:02:51.920 He used the whole word, not F.

00:02:53.940 But, yep.

00:02:56.740 Somewhere, somewhere, there's a white person putting on a costume that's going to ruin his whole life.

00:03:04.240 Or her whole life.

00:03:05.500 But I think it's probably a guy.

00:03:07.500 If I might be sexist for a moment, it's probably a guy.

00:03:11.580 It doesn't have to be.

00:03:13.140 Or probably.

00:03:14.020 Probably.

00:03:16.840 There's a story about Alec Baldwin.

00:03:19.220 He's finally talking to the press.

00:03:20.600 And as he was talking, his wife, Hilaria, tried to interject yourself into it.

00:03:26.740 And apparently, it's reported that Alec Baldwin snapped at his wife.

00:03:31.640 He snapped at her.

00:03:33.800 What was a word that they might have used in the past for a story like this?

00:03:39.540 Snapped at her.

00:03:41.280 Something about what she did caused a reaction in him to make him snap.

00:03:48.240 There's another word for that, isn't it?

00:03:50.600 Triggered.

00:03:52.000 Triggered.

00:03:52.820 Yeah.

00:03:53.840 Don't they usually say triggered?

00:03:56.460 I don't know why they didn't use it this time.

00:03:59.760 Well, my favorite story of the day, and it's hard to pick a favorite today.

00:04:03.460 Because the news is all crazy stuff.

00:04:06.140 But my favorite, probably, is the Lincoln Project.

00:04:10.160 You know, the Lincoln Project.

00:04:11.560 They're sort of the anti-Republican group.

00:04:15.780 Mostly they were anti-Trump, but anti-Republican, it seems.

00:04:18.960 And they're ex-Republicans, I guess.

00:04:22.560 So that was their deal.

00:04:24.520 And they tried to influence the Virginia governor race by having five of their members dress up as white supremacists.

00:04:33.800 Now, if you didn't know how white supremacists dress, this is one of the things that the Lincoln Project taught us.

00:04:43.280 Apparently, to dress like a white supremacist, you need a shirt, preferably white, with a collar.

00:04:50.200 And you need khaki pants, long khaki pants, and maybe a baseball hat.

00:04:59.640 You put that outfit on, and you accessorize with a tiki torch, and anybody's going to think you're a white supremacist.

00:05:09.440 Anybody who sees that, they're going to say, well, that's a white supremacist.

00:05:13.620 Look, you might as well be wearing the hood.

00:05:16.200 I mean, that's the whole uniform right there.

00:05:19.200 And so five of them pretended to be actual white supremacists,

00:05:23.380 and they posed in front of the Republican candidate's bus to make it seem as if he was associated with the white supremacy.

00:05:31.640 Now, I've seen this story for sort of a couple days old, or several days old, the story.

00:05:40.640 And there was one small detail in the story that I missed.

00:05:44.600 And what I understood about it was that people were wondering whether these were real white supremacists

00:05:51.240 or perhaps, you know, some kind of a political theater.

00:05:55.600 And, you know, I looked quickly at the picture and wasn't too interested.

00:05:58.760 And I thought to myself, yeah, it looks like some people pretending to be white supremacists, or maybe they are, I don't know.

00:06:04.760 But I didn't really look too closely at the picture.

00:06:07.900 Did anybody look closely at the picture?

00:06:11.300 There were only five of them.

00:06:13.820 One of them's black.

00:06:17.140 I'm not making this up.

00:06:19.240 They sent a black guy to pretend to be a white supremacist.

00:06:24.120 And there were only five people.

00:06:25.620 But they decided that diversity in their project was perhaps more important than authenticity.

00:06:34.420 And so they favored diversity over authenticity and sent a black guy, which represented 20% of all the people there.

00:06:43.900 And one was a woman, a white woman.

00:06:46.240 And this is how well they did their prank.

00:06:51.340 Now, here's the funny part.

00:06:53.380 You're probably thinking to yourself, you know, if I were going to design a prank where I was trying to convince people that these were white supremacists,

00:07:00.400 I probably would discriminate against the black candidate for that job.

00:07:06.220 I don't know.

00:07:06.720 I probably would discriminate, because that's just me.

00:07:10.980 I have a bad character.

00:07:13.180 But the people of the Lincoln Project have shown us the way and showed us what good character looks like and people who are more woke, I think.

00:07:22.900 And so 20% of their white supremacists were a black man.

00:07:26.800 You have to admire their commitment to diversity.

00:07:31.940 I think that's admirable.

00:07:34.980 CNN has some fake news.

00:07:36.880 Surprise?

00:07:37.680 Are you surprised?

00:07:39.220 Are you surprised that CNN has some fake news?

00:07:42.480 Well, here's the fake headline trick, where the headline doesn't match the story.

00:07:47.840 I think this is their favorite trick, because people don't read the story.

00:07:53.520 Is anybody guilty of reading the headline and thinking, well, I don't think I need to read the story, because the headline is the story?

00:08:01.280 You know, if you read a headline that says, Biden stubs his toe, do you need to read the rest of the story?

00:08:10.940 Because if he had hurt himself badly, it would say, you know, Biden hospitalized.

00:08:14.280 But you read a headline, Biden stubs his toe, you think, well, I don't need the detail.

00:08:19.780 I don't need to know which toe it was or how he did it.

00:08:22.120 He stubbed his toe.

00:08:23.760 So CNN does this, where they'll give you the headline to make you think you know the story.

00:08:29.440 And this one was, their headline was, quote, a completely damning video of a Trump ally emerges.

00:08:36.540 And it showed an undercover video of conservative lawyer John Eastman.

00:08:40.780 And he was part of the conversation about, you know, not certifying the election and seeing if Pence would overturn it.

00:08:50.160 And so I decided to play the completely damning video.

00:08:57.800 There wasn't anything even slightly damning in it.

00:09:00.800 It was like nothing damning at all.

00:09:03.160 It was literally exactly what you already knew, that he and other people thought, yeah, wouldn't it be great if Pence could overturn this thing?

00:09:11.980 It's all the stuff we do.

00:09:14.000 There's literally nothing damning in it.

00:09:16.200 That isn't just common knowledge already.

00:09:18.920 So, yes, the completely damning video that had no damning information in it.

00:09:22.820 Here's some more fake CNN news, where the headline doesn't match the news.

00:09:27.820 It said that Fox News is trying to distance itself from Tucker Carlson.

00:09:33.580 Fox News is trying to distance itself from Tucker Carlson.

00:09:38.300 And it's because, and you say to yourself, whoa.

00:09:41.460 You know, the implication of this is, whoa.

00:09:44.280 Even Fox News management has figured out what a monster Tucker Carlson is.

00:09:50.900 So they're trying to distance themselves.

00:09:52.580 But then you listen to the story, or you read it, and is the story about Fox News distancing itself?

00:10:02.880 Nope.

00:10:03.940 Nope.

00:10:05.060 It's not the story.

00:10:06.500 Here's the story that they characterized as Fox News distancing itself.

00:10:11.600 Apparently, in an exchange with some publicist or PR person associated with Fox News, that person, the PR person said, quote,

00:10:23.980 Can you please add, so it's clear, that these new episodes, talking about the new series that Tucker Carlson is having.

00:10:34.800 And he said, Can you make it clear that these episodes are on Fox Nation?

00:10:37.840 Now, that's their app where you can see extra opinion stuff.

00:10:41.600 Make it clear that it's on Fox Nation, the subscription-based streaming platform that is behind a paywall.

00:10:48.520 I don't see that noted anywhere in the piece.

00:10:51.520 Tucker Carlson Originals, which is what this episode is, is not for the channel, meaning not for the regular Fox News.

00:10:58.480 Now, is that an example of Fox News distancing itself from Tucker Carlson?

00:11:04.900 I don't see it.

00:11:08.660 Here's what I see.

00:11:11.080 Fox News is really good at separating news from opinion.

00:11:17.300 That's what just happened.

00:11:19.160 Fox News said, Make sure you know that we separate the news from the opinion.

00:11:24.240 Now, Fox News Channel, as opposed to Fox Nation, the app that they also are associated with,

00:11:31.540 Fox News Channel also does a good job, in my opinion, of saying this program is news and this is opinion.

00:11:39.480 Whereas CNN, what's the big criticism you hear from me about CNN?

00:11:45.020 That they don't do that.

00:11:46.080 Their news slash opinion is sort of merged.

00:11:52.320 All their news is opinion-y.

00:11:54.600 And I'm not saying that's good or bad.

00:11:57.060 I'm just saying that's a different business model.

00:11:59.520 Whereas Fox News likes to let you know what's news and what's opinion.

00:12:04.200 And I think a PR person just emphasized exactly what they want you to know.

00:12:09.120 What is news and what's opinion?

00:12:10.680 If it's on Fox Nation, it's opinion.

00:12:12.560 Now, is that distancing or is that clarifying?

00:12:18.040 To me, it's just clarifying.

00:12:20.080 It's clarifying a basic corporate philosophy of separating their news from their opinion.

00:12:26.560 But it's treated like CNN, like it's some kind of flaw.

00:12:31.000 All right.

00:12:31.700 So I call that fake news.

00:12:35.000 Then New York Times had a little fake news themselves.

00:12:38.560 So I was reading an article just, I think it was today.

00:12:44.820 It said that the New York Times, it said that the FBI informants, the idea that there were

00:12:49.920 FBI informants behind January 6th, that it was actually organized as like a false flag,

00:12:55.340 et cetera, has been debunked, has been repeatedly debunked.

00:13:00.980 So that's what the New York Times says.

00:13:02.360 That the idea that the FBI was behind the January 6th stuff has been repeatedly debunked.

00:13:09.060 And they linked it to two articles.

00:13:12.700 One was hyperlinked repeatedly, and the other was separately debunked.

00:13:19.380 Now, if you're reading this, do you say to yourself, oh, it looks like this is pretty well debunked,

00:13:25.000 because it's been debunked repeatedly and debunked.

00:13:28.720 Now, do you click on those links?

00:13:32.160 How many people click on those two links?

00:13:34.840 They say it's been repeatedly, and here you can see for yourself, debunked, and see for

00:13:39.560 yourself.

00:13:40.640 Well, I click those links to see if they've been repeatedly debunked.

00:13:46.260 Here's what debunked means in the New York Times way of thinking.

00:13:51.220 First of all, it's a link to their own reporting.

00:13:53.880 Okay.

00:13:54.640 Just note that.

00:13:55.540 It's their own reporting.

00:13:56.400 It said that there is no evidence of this claim in June.

00:14:03.300 So in early June, they said there's no evidence for this claim.

00:14:07.540 Is that debunked?

00:14:10.680 If a major news organization says there's no evidence of a thing they looked for no evidence

00:14:17.080 of, we didn't find anything when we didn't do our research, and when we didn't look for

00:14:23.520 it, there was nothing there.

00:14:24.500 And that's what they called it, a debunk.

00:14:27.800 It's debunked because they didn't look for it and didn't find it.

00:14:31.940 Now, I happen to think it didn't happen.

00:14:34.800 Just to be clear, I want to be clear, I don't think the FBI organized the riots.

00:14:42.400 I'm open to the argument, though.

00:14:44.440 I'm open to the argument that there was some involvement, and maybe in some way you could

00:14:48.960 claim that that happened.

00:14:49.720 I'm open to it.

00:14:51.420 I just, same as the New York Times, I haven't seen any argument to debunk it, or I'm sorry,

00:14:58.020 I haven't seen any evidence for it.

00:15:01.100 Now, I also haven't seen the special because it hasn't run yet.

00:15:05.760 So, I think they're debunking something they haven't seen that has to be noted.

00:15:12.200 They've only seen the trailer, and I can't imagine the trailer gives you the context you

00:15:16.320 would need.

00:15:17.860 So, the FBI, so that was one link.

00:15:21.160 One link was from June.

00:15:22.760 Now, isn't the entire, I haven't seen the special, of course, because it hasn't run, but back me

00:15:28.900 on this assumption, we can't know for sure, but isn't the assumption that we've learned

00:15:33.640 something since June?

00:15:36.040 Am I wrong about this?

00:15:37.540 Give me a fact check on this.

00:15:39.380 Isn't the whole Tucker Carlson special based on what we've learned since June?

00:15:46.880 Am I wrong?

00:15:48.840 Yeah, I think I'm right.

00:15:50.060 So, when the New York Times says it's been repeatedly debunked and linked to an article

00:15:54.800 from June, when the entire point of it is we've learned things recently, that's just

00:16:01.460 fake news, isn't it?

00:16:02.960 How is that not fake news?

00:16:05.240 I mean, it looks like it's intended to be misleading.

00:16:08.820 It doesn't look like an accident, does it?

00:16:12.100 And then the other link I looked at was from March.

00:16:16.500 It was from March.

00:16:17.520 Do you think we've learned anything about January 6th since March?

00:16:23.720 And the New York Times was trying to sell these two links as clearly debunking it.

00:16:29.000 And then the only debunk in it was a link to Snopes basically saying it was unfounded in March.

00:16:38.140 So, again, I actually, my prediction would be that no matter how much you look into it,

00:16:43.700 and no matter what I hear on Tucker Carlson's show that I haven't seen yet, because it hasn't aired,

00:16:49.400 I don't think that that will, that the speculation that the FBI caused it, I don't think that that's going to hold.

00:16:57.640 But I could be wrong.

00:16:59.420 Does everybody hear this part?

00:17:01.640 Because if it turns out I'm wrong, I want you to remember the part where I said,

00:17:06.220 you know, I'm not positive about it, but my best guess, if I had to put odds on it, 80%,

00:17:14.640 I'd say I'm 80% confident you won't find the FBI who is behind it.

00:17:19.840 But 20% is a pretty big number.

00:17:23.520 And the 20% isn't based on anything except just how I feel, you know, experience, I guess.

00:17:28.640 All right, President Biden met with Turkey's Erdogan,

00:17:36.560 and it made me wonder, is there a story that hasn't been told?

00:17:42.400 Correct me if I'm wrong.

00:17:43.860 Go back into the Wayback Machine.

00:17:46.240 Reverse your time.

00:17:49.460 I take you back to a time when a president named Trump

00:17:53.540 was discussing pulling American troops out of Syria,

00:17:57.860 and the big conversation was,

00:17:59.660 you fool, you fool, you can't do that,

00:18:02.240 because the Kurds who have been our allies

00:18:04.320 will be slaughtered the moment we leave.

00:18:07.540 That really happened, right?

00:18:08.960 I mean, the story happened.

00:18:11.600 And then time passes.

00:18:15.020 What happened to the Kurds?

00:18:18.460 Is there any update on the Kurds?

00:18:20.500 Because I was kind of worried about that, weren't you?

00:18:26.080 I mean, that seemed like a pretty major deal.

00:18:29.780 Not just in terms of, you know, life and death,

00:18:32.720 but in terms of strategic, I don't know, branding for the United States.

00:18:37.480 If we could abandon that ally, we could abandon another.

00:18:41.660 And apparently we did in Afghanistan.

00:18:43.420 So I think it's a big part of the story.

00:18:46.300 Did the Kurds have a bad ending?

00:18:49.220 Or did they just negotiate their way

00:18:51.940 to some kind of a, you know, stable situation?

00:18:57.620 Does anybody know what happened?

00:19:00.420 Yeah.

00:19:01.080 Were the Kurds in the way?

00:19:09.440 Somebody's asking me if I'm biased

00:19:11.000 because I'm predicting that the FBI were not involved.

00:19:14.640 But I don't know.

00:19:15.700 What would be the bias?

00:19:17.680 Biased by what?

00:19:18.560 If you're looking at just a prediction

00:19:23.360 that's just based on how I feel and my experience,

00:19:27.340 it's not really based on much,

00:19:29.320 then I would say, I don't know if it's bias

00:19:31.820 or just we're all biased all the time.

00:19:34.500 So maybe that's just built into it.

00:19:36.540 I think bias is built into every prediction, isn't it?

00:19:39.720 I don't think you can separate that.

00:19:41.960 All right.

00:19:42.740 Here's what I would like all of you to do.

00:19:44.500 I don't ask you for much, do I?

00:19:48.180 I mean, I try to give you this best quality entertainment

00:19:51.460 that's ever existed in the history of civilization and before.

00:19:55.340 And what do I ask in return?

00:19:58.980 What do I ask in return?

00:20:00.720 Very little.

00:20:01.900 Very little.

00:20:02.900 But today I have an ask.

00:20:04.420 And I would like us all to join together

00:20:08.080 in what I consider a very important cause,

00:20:11.600 which is a prank to see how many people we can convince

00:20:16.200 that President Biden's real name,

00:20:19.880 that his real legal name,

00:20:21.420 is Francis Joseph Biden.

00:20:26.300 Also known as F. Joe Biden.

00:20:30.720 Can we do that?

00:20:32.540 Can we start calling him Francis Joseph Biden?

00:20:36.380 Just sort of throw it in, you know, some references.

00:20:39.300 Don't even make a big deal about it.

00:20:41.380 Maybe just do a tweet in which you refer to him that way.

00:20:44.840 Possibly when you're talking to your friends,

00:20:46.940 you say, I don't know,

00:20:48.840 I'm not so sure Francis Joseph Biden

00:20:51.000 is doing the job that we elected him for.

00:20:53.880 Or you might say,

00:20:55.440 oh, I heard that Francis Joseph Biden

00:20:58.860 was visiting the Pope.

00:21:00.880 And don't make a big deal about it.

00:21:02.540 Just throw it in as a reference.

00:21:05.120 Francis Joseph Biden.

00:21:07.100 Because if we can get this to work,

00:21:09.320 then we can also tweet F.JoeBiden.

00:21:13.580 And it looks like we're just talking about his name.

00:21:16.340 So F.JoeBiden, president.

00:21:18.840 Which leads to a very important question

00:21:23.140 from Twitter user Willy Nilly,

00:21:25.840 who asked this insightful question.

00:21:27.760 Did people hate Scott Fitzgerald?

00:21:33.620 I'm just going to let that settle for a little bit.

00:21:37.440 Did people hate Scott Fitzgerald?

00:21:40.420 Now, that's only for you who are literary in nature

00:21:43.600 and know that there's a famous author

00:21:46.260 named F. Scott Fitzgerald.

00:21:48.480 It's very funny if you knew that.

00:21:51.180 All right.

00:21:52.240 We have a new video of Biden molesting the Pope.

00:21:57.160 And by molesting, I mean

00:21:58.900 when Joe Biden grabs your hand for a handshake,

00:22:02.500 that mofo doesn't let go.

00:22:05.880 And it got a little too close.

00:22:09.040 And you've got to watch the video

00:22:10.460 of Joe Biden not releasing the Pope's hand,

00:22:14.140 getting way too close to his personal space

00:22:16.240 during a pandemic,

00:22:17.900 and spitting a very long story onto his face.

00:22:24.180 And, you know, they say that you can get,

00:22:27.520 you can still carry COVID if you're vaccinated.

00:22:30.240 Now, I know the president probably gets tested

00:22:32.420 every day and every time he goes into a meeting

00:22:34.800 with world leaders.

00:22:36.460 But there's a non-zero chance

00:22:39.320 that Francis Joseph Biden

00:22:42.040 just gave the Pope COVID.

00:22:46.980 Which I don't wish on the Pope at all.

00:22:50.040 I don't wish on the Pope at all.

00:22:52.380 But here's another reference.

00:22:55.460 You're going to make a joke

00:22:56.300 that no more than 20% of you will get.

00:22:59.620 So this is just for the 20% who get it.

00:23:01.580 When I saw the photo of Joe Biden

00:23:03.960 together with the Pope,

00:23:05.220 I thought to myself,

00:23:06.740 huh, I'll bet both of them shit in the woods.

00:23:11.900 Anybody?

00:23:13.560 Anybody?

00:23:14.980 That reference?

00:23:16.900 I think both of them shit in the woods?

00:23:19.300 Anybody?

00:23:21.500 Okay.

00:23:22.440 I guess that one was just for me.

00:23:25.720 Maybe it was just for me.

00:23:27.200 But if you knew what I was referring to,

00:23:31.100 it's kind of funny.

00:23:32.360 It's kind of funny.

00:23:34.840 All right.

00:23:35.400 So there's a Rupar video of their meeting.

00:23:38.880 By Rupar, I mean a deviously edited video

00:23:42.320 to make Biden look more incapable

00:23:46.220 than he actually is.

00:23:47.580 So the video,

00:23:49.140 in the real thing,

00:23:50.640 without the fake edit,

00:23:51.720 that Biden is launching into a very long story

00:23:55.160 about Satchel Paige,

00:23:56.820 a black baseball player

00:23:58.100 who, I don't know,

00:23:59.420 broke some records.

00:24:01.080 And

00:24:01.400 the Rupar part

00:24:05.420 is they cut out the part

00:24:06.720 where Biden

00:24:08.320 explains what he's talking about.

00:24:10.320 and it looks like

00:24:12.200 Biden is

00:24:13.200 it looks like

00:24:21.020 it looks like

00:24:22.240 it looks like

00:24:26.840 it looks like Biden

00:24:28.340 thinks he's meeting Satchel Paige.

00:24:35.280 But

00:24:36.000 Satchel Paige,

00:24:38.160 a famous old baseball player

00:24:40.440 who was black.

00:24:43.600 And

00:24:44.080 and the funniest part is

00:24:45.620 I saw people in the comments

00:24:46.760 who are like,

00:24:47.420 you know,

00:24:47.780 WTF?

00:24:48.880 What's going on here?

00:24:50.020 Because they actually thought

00:24:51.140 they thought it was within

00:24:52.680 the realm of possibility

00:24:53.940 that

00:24:54.900 that Biden

00:24:56.440 had met the Pope

00:24:57.300 and confused him

00:24:58.580 with an American

00:24:59.240 black baseball player.

00:25:01.280 And

00:25:01.300 and

00:25:03.500 you have to ask yourself

00:25:05.000 if there are American citizens

00:25:06.780 who

00:25:07.200 who

00:25:07.520 their

00:25:08.160 their first

00:25:08.840 encounter with that

00:25:10.220 was that it was probably true.

00:25:14.080 And that's the leader we

00:25:15.320 that's the leader we elected.

00:25:17.940 Oh

00:25:18.240 but my favorite part

00:25:19.720 you have to see this video

00:25:21.100 it's funny all the way through

00:25:22.420 but

00:25:23.240 the funniest part to me

00:25:24.660 was

00:25:25.480 the funniest part to me

00:25:31.900 was

00:25:32.800 Biden's

00:25:33.300 you know

00:25:33.520 holding his hand

00:25:34.760 and

00:25:35.180 holding him too close

00:25:36.460 and he launches into

00:25:37.720 this boring story

00:25:38.780 and then

00:25:40.140 the

00:25:40.540 I guess the translator

00:25:41.720 realized

00:25:42.260 uh oh

00:25:42.700 you know

00:25:43.540 this is more than

00:25:44.260 how are you doing

00:25:44.900 so I'd better run in there

00:25:46.100 and translate.

00:25:47.380 So the translator

00:25:48.060 runs in there

00:25:48.760 to translate

00:25:49.560 his

00:25:49.860 his way too long

00:25:51.060 boring story

00:25:51.820 about

00:25:52.060 Satchel Paige

00:25:53.000 you know

00:25:54.020 winning

00:25:54.600 I don't know

00:25:55.420 doing a

00:25:56.080 shutout at age 45

00:25:57.400 or something like that

00:25:58.200 and

00:25:59.080 as Biden gets to

00:26:00.380 close to the end

00:26:02.020 of the story

00:26:02.620 but he hasn't reached

00:26:03.960 the punchline

00:26:04.680 the translator

00:26:06.200 tells the Pope

00:26:06.960 you know

00:26:07.240 he's not done

00:26:07.740 with the story

00:26:08.240 but the Pope

00:26:09.440 I think

00:26:10.360 hoping that the story

00:26:11.400 is over

00:26:11.800 he does the universal

00:26:13.660 the universal

00:26:15.400 body language

00:26:16.320 that says

00:26:16.740 ah ha ha

00:26:17.300 that's a good story

00:26:18.780 and we're done

00:26:19.300 with the story

00:26:19.760 now

00:26:19.980 he does the

00:26:20.860 you know

00:26:23.300 the fake laugh

00:26:24.080 but then

00:26:25.500 he realizes

00:26:26.100 that wasn't

00:26:26.860 the punchline

00:26:27.480 that there's

00:26:28.720 more to come

00:26:29.320 and I

00:26:30.120 and I could

00:26:30.460 just imagine

00:26:31.040 the Pope

00:26:31.500 like praying

00:26:32.320 to God

00:26:32.800 in that moment

00:26:33.480 dear God

00:26:34.740 please make him

00:26:36.580 let go of my hand

00:26:37.440 and end this story

00:26:38.320 get his

00:26:39.500 COVID spittle

00:26:41.040 out of my face

00:26:42.500 dear God

00:26:43.720 what have I done

00:26:44.360 to you

00:26:44.800 have I sinned

00:26:45.900 well I thought

00:26:46.800 I'd been a good

00:26:47.480 Catholic

00:26:48.000 no help me

00:26:49.400 help me

00:26:49.960 help me

00:26:50.520 now that's what

00:26:51.320 I thought the Pope

00:26:52.120 was thinking

00:26:52.640 but maybe I'm

00:26:54.660 wrong about that

00:26:55.340 really

00:26:55.800 just speculation

00:26:56.660 well what else

00:27:01.360 is happening

00:27:01.860 and the other

00:27:04.640 thing that's funny

00:27:05.260 about that story

00:27:06.040 is it was the

00:27:07.120 kind of story

00:27:07.860 that you

00:27:08.460 you really don't

00:27:09.400 think there's

00:27:09.800 much chance

00:27:10.440 it's going to

00:27:10.840 translate too

00:27:11.480 well

00:27:11.720 and but

00:27:13.840 Biden was not

00:27:15.900 was not

00:27:16.700 disappointed

00:27:17.160 all right

00:27:17.660 there's an

00:27:19.740 interesting little

00:27:20.620 Twitter battle

00:27:22.420 going on

00:27:23.080 if you can

00:27:23.460 call it that

00:27:23.940 between

00:27:24.300 anti-racist

00:27:26.760 what would you

00:27:28.280 call him

00:27:28.680 Ibram Kendi

00:27:30.100 if you like him

00:27:32.680 you'd call him

00:27:33.460 a warrior

00:27:35.000 on the side

00:27:36.560 of anti-racism

00:27:37.500 and one of the

00:27:38.740 most famous

00:27:39.160 people

00:27:39.600 promoting

00:27:41.000 you know

00:27:42.640 the fight

00:27:43.680 against

00:27:44.120 systemic racism

00:27:45.700 now if you

00:27:46.920 don't like him

00:27:47.540 you would say

00:27:49.020 he's a racist

00:27:49.660 so depending on

00:27:51.480 whether you like

00:27:52.080 him or you

00:27:52.540 don't like him

00:27:53.040 he's either

00:27:53.520 obviously a racist

00:27:55.020 or he's an

00:27:55.720 anti-racist

00:27:56.380 so he's the

00:27:57.980 greatest person

00:27:58.620 or the worst

00:27:59.040 person depending

00:27:59.700 on your point

00:28:00.140 of view

00:28:00.380 and he had a

00:28:02.080 little Twitter

00:28:02.480 exchange with

00:28:03.160 Jack Posobiec

00:28:04.200 you all know

00:28:05.300 Jack from

00:28:06.120 Twitter

00:28:06.400 and the issue

00:28:09.940 was about

00:28:10.700 so Ibram Kendi

00:28:13.380 at first

00:28:14.500 some background

00:28:15.500 I told you about

00:28:16.180 this story before

00:28:16.900 but there's an

00:28:17.380 update to it

00:28:17.960 so Kendi

00:28:19.460 had tweeted

00:28:20.060 that there

00:28:21.360 were a bunch

00:28:21.720 of white

00:28:22.100 people

00:28:22.560 who were

00:28:23.320 applying to

00:28:23.820 college

00:28:24.220 and lying

00:28:24.820 about their

00:28:25.260 ethnicity

00:28:25.680 thinking it

00:28:26.880 would give

00:28:27.140 them an

00:28:27.760 advantage

00:28:28.160 and the

00:28:31.120 I guess

00:28:31.880 75%

00:28:32.760 of the

00:28:33.660 kids who

00:28:34.180 claimed they

00:28:34.600 were Native

00:28:35.080 American

00:28:35.540 got accepted

00:28:36.280 to college

00:28:36.780 and so

00:28:39.980 and then he

00:28:40.700 later deleted

00:28:41.720 his own tweet

00:28:42.500 and a lot

00:28:44.340 of people

00:28:44.660 including me

00:28:45.420 said well

00:28:46.240 I think

00:28:46.720 there's an

00:28:47.280 obvious reason

00:28:48.040 he deleted

00:28:48.540 the tweet

00:28:49.000 because it

00:28:50.040 proves everything

00:28:50.720 he said

00:28:51.280 is wrong

00:28:52.320 that systemic

00:28:54.740 racism does

00:28:56.000 exist but it's

00:28:56.760 against white

00:28:57.400 people because

00:28:58.520 white people are

00:28:59.320 trying to pretend

00:29:00.100 to be another

00:29:00.820 ethnicity to get

00:29:01.820 advantages

00:29:02.360 and so the

00:29:04.720 speculation is

00:29:05.600 because we can't

00:29:06.260 read Ibram

00:29:07.760 Kendi's mind

00:29:08.840 and I don't think

00:29:09.980 it would be fair

00:29:10.440 to do that

00:29:10.980 but the

00:29:11.940 speculation was

00:29:12.920 the reason

00:29:13.720 he

00:29:14.060 let's get rid

00:29:17.260 of this

00:29:17.560 red-haired

00:29:18.020 guy again

00:29:18.600 goodbye

00:29:20.260 all right

00:29:21.640 the speculation

00:29:22.400 is that he

00:29:23.280 realized that

00:29:23.880 his tweet

00:29:24.420 debunked his

00:29:25.720 entire philosophy

00:29:26.720 and reason for

00:29:27.480 being because

00:29:28.420 it showed that

00:29:28.980 white people

00:29:29.400 were pretending

00:29:29.980 to be people

00:29:31.200 of color to

00:29:31.860 get advantages

00:29:32.420 now when

00:29:33.880 Jack

00:29:34.240 Posabek

00:29:35.840 tweeted

00:29:36.620 you know

00:29:37.660 something of

00:29:38.180 that nature

00:29:38.680 Jack used

00:29:41.580 the phrase

00:29:42.160 I broke

00:29:43.960 him

00:29:44.160 or I broke

00:29:45.360 I broke

00:29:46.680 Kendi

00:29:47.100 so that was

00:29:48.500 Jack's tweet

00:29:49.100 and it was

00:29:49.800 referring to

00:29:50.440 the you know

00:29:51.200 the exchange

00:29:52.760 and

00:29:54.160 I have to

00:29:57.120 agree with

00:29:57.840 Jack except

00:29:59.040 if I did

00:30:00.900 if I did

00:30:02.820 apparently

00:30:03.900 I'd be a

00:30:04.440 racist

00:30:04.840 because what

00:30:05.960 we learned

00:30:06.380 from Ibram

00:30:07.500 Kendi

00:30:07.760 is that

00:30:09.120 using the

00:30:10.240 words that

00:30:10.900 you broke

00:30:11.580 him

00:30:11.860 if it's

00:30:12.800 referring to

00:30:13.440 a black

00:30:14.080 man or

00:30:14.540 woman

00:30:14.840 that you

00:30:15.980 broke

00:30:16.380 them

00:30:16.680 that is

00:30:17.780 a reference

00:30:18.360 to slavery

00:30:19.060 did you know

00:30:20.580 that

00:30:20.800 did you know

00:30:22.100 that you

00:30:22.440 say when

00:30:22.820 you say

00:30:23.100 you broke

00:30:23.600 somebody

00:30:24.060 it's actually

00:30:25.280 that historical

00:30:26.260 roots are

00:30:27.840 in slavery

00:30:28.360 and so really

00:30:29.060 it's a reference

00:30:29.540 to breaking

00:30:30.100 a slave

00:30:30.540 did you

00:30:31.640 know that

00:30:32.100 no you

00:30:33.680 didn't know

00:30:34.120 that because

00:30:34.600 it's not

00:30:34.980 fucking true

00:30:35.760 right

00:30:36.800 now it

00:30:38.740 might be

00:30:39.080 historically

00:30:39.540 true that

00:30:40.020 the word

00:30:40.340 was used

00:30:40.860 in slavery

00:30:42.180 I don't

00:30:42.560 know

00:30:42.800 but words

00:30:44.120 get used

00:30:44.820 in lots

00:30:45.720 of different

00:30:46.080 ways

00:30:46.460 when people

00:30:47.840 say they

00:30:48.320 broke somebody

00:30:49.020 it is purely

00:30:49.900 a Twitter

00:30:50.460 reference

00:30:51.040 it's a

00:30:51.960 social media

00:30:52.500 reference

00:30:53.020 that's all

00:30:53.720 it is

00:30:54.060 and

00:30:55.080 what does

00:30:57.540 it tell

00:30:57.860 you when

00:30:58.400 somebody makes

00:30:59.080 a point

00:30:59.560 and then

00:31:00.080 the response

00:31:00.660 to the

00:31:00.960 point

00:31:01.160 is to

00:31:01.560 attack

00:31:01.980 the

00:31:02.720 messenger

00:31:03.220 what does

00:31:05.120 it mean

00:31:05.620 when somebody

00:31:06.460 ignores

00:31:07.260 the point

00:31:08.200 and attacks

00:31:09.740 the messenger

00:31:10.840 in this case

00:31:12.180 by calling

00:31:12.660 Jack

00:31:13.000 a racist

00:31:14.000 for using

00:31:14.660 the term

00:31:15.180 broke

00:31:15.900 what's that

00:31:18.100 mean

00:31:18.320 well it could

00:31:20.480 mean that

00:31:20.960 you're dealing

00:31:21.340 with a

00:31:22.080 vulnerable

00:31:23.180 narcissist

00:31:23.780 that would

00:31:24.760 be one

00:31:25.280 possible

00:31:26.020 explanation

00:31:26.780 because

00:31:27.620 vulnerable

00:31:28.020 narcissists

00:31:28.720 use this

00:31:29.260 technique

00:31:29.740 if you

00:31:31.060 counter

00:31:32.020 their argument

00:31:32.660 with anything

00:31:33.280 effective

00:31:33.740 they will

00:31:34.640 never argue

00:31:35.220 their argument

00:31:35.740 they will

00:31:36.480 go right

00:31:36.880 at what's

00:31:37.200 wrong

00:31:37.400 with you

00:31:37.760 they attack

00:31:38.420 the messenger

00:31:38.920 so I'm

00:31:40.320 not saying

00:31:40.700 that Kendi

00:31:41.480 is a

00:31:42.120 vulnerable

00:31:42.480 narcissist

00:31:42.960 I'm just

00:31:43.500 saying that's

00:31:43.920 a behavior

00:31:44.360 associated

00:31:45.000 with people

00:31:46.040 who have

00:31:46.280 a personality

00:31:46.840 disorder

00:31:47.380 so

00:31:48.720 whatever

00:31:49.700 the issue

00:31:51.220 is with

00:31:51.740 Kendi

00:31:52.000 it matches

00:31:53.060 the symptoms

00:31:54.180 of a

00:31:54.560 personality

00:31:55.020 disorder

00:31:55.620 as opposed

00:31:56.880 to an

00:31:57.660 argument

00:31:58.020 but then

00:32:01.020 Kendi

00:32:01.260 said that

00:32:01.860 Jack lied

00:32:03.240 about Kendi's

00:32:04.760 tweet

00:32:05.060 but he didn't

00:32:06.100 really detail

00:32:07.660 what he lied

00:32:08.200 about so I

00:32:08.720 tweeted to ask

00:32:09.380 for a

00:32:09.620 clarification

00:32:10.100 and what

00:32:12.320 Kendi

00:32:12.760 said was

00:32:13.380 that Jack

00:32:15.920 was basically

00:32:16.860 mischaracterizing

00:32:17.940 Kendi's

00:32:18.900 thinking

00:32:19.260 because

00:32:20.520 he referred

00:32:22.000 to Jack's

00:32:22.540 tweet

00:32:22.760 as a

00:32:23.140 tortured

00:32:23.480 line

00:32:23.880 of

00:32:24.040 thinking

00:32:24.380 that since

00:32:25.560 white

00:32:25.840 applicants

00:32:26.360 quote

00:32:26.760 think they

00:32:27.560 get an

00:32:27.900 advantage

00:32:28.400 by lying

00:32:29.600 then it

00:32:30.100 must be

00:32:30.440 true

00:32:30.720 therefore

00:32:32.040 structural

00:32:32.620 racism

00:32:33.100 doesn't

00:32:33.640 exist

00:32:34.080 now

00:32:35.040 this is

00:32:35.880 Kendi

00:32:36.120 putting a

00:32:36.840 ridiculous

00:32:37.440 argument

00:32:37.880 into

00:32:38.400 Jack's

00:32:40.280 head

00:32:40.760 as if

00:32:41.900 Jack said

00:32:42.300 it

00:32:42.480 which is

00:32:43.220 the typical

00:32:43.720 Twitter way

00:32:44.280 of arguing

00:32:44.680 I guess

00:32:45.220 but

00:32:47.280 here's

00:32:47.800 the thing

00:32:48.260 is the

00:32:51.400 problem

00:32:51.740 that the

00:32:52.220 white

00:32:52.460 applicants

00:32:53.000 wrongly

00:32:54.260 believe

00:32:54.620 they'll

00:32:54.880 get it

00:32:55.280 get a

00:32:56.400 advantage

00:32:57.160 because the

00:32:57.880 story also

00:32:58.320 says 75%

00:32:59.540 of the ones

00:32:59.980 who used

00:33:00.360 this trick

00:33:01.060 got accepted

00:33:01.740 to college

00:33:02.300 but I don't

00:33:03.820 know what

00:33:04.120 is normal

00:33:04.620 you know

00:33:06.540 if

00:33:06.740 is it

00:33:07.380 wrong

00:33:07.660 for 75%

00:33:08.760 of the

00:33:09.020 people

00:33:09.240 who apply

00:33:09.560 to college

00:33:09.980 to get

00:33:10.460 accepted

00:33:10.840 to some

00:33:11.860 college

00:33:12.340 is that

00:33:13.640 is that

00:33:15.000 even

00:33:15.260 unusual

00:33:15.800 because I

00:33:16.820 would think

00:33:17.140 that the

00:33:17.420 only people

00:33:17.860 who apply

00:33:18.600 to colleges

00:33:19.100 are people

00:33:19.640 who have

00:33:19.860 a reasonable

00:33:20.560 expectation

00:33:21.800 they could

00:33:22.200 get accepted

00:33:22.760 and you

00:33:23.940 usually only

00:33:24.620 apply to

00:33:25.080 colleges

00:33:25.400 you can

00:33:25.840 get into

00:33:26.300 right

00:33:26.540 like I

00:33:27.800 did not

00:33:28.440 apply to

00:33:28.980 Harvard

00:33:29.300 do you

00:33:30.960 know why

00:33:31.420 I did

00:33:33.680 not apply

00:33:34.300 to

00:33:34.700 Yale

00:33:36.100 guess

00:33:37.800 why

00:33:38.180 couldn't

00:33:39.420 get in

00:33:39.760 I mean

00:33:40.660 it was

00:33:40.860 obvious

00:33:41.140 I couldn't

00:33:41.520 get in

00:33:41.860 came from

00:33:43.220 a very

00:33:43.460 small town

00:33:44.040 it wouldn't

00:33:44.380 matter

00:33:44.660 it wouldn't

00:33:45.480 have mattered

00:33:45.760 anything else

00:33:46.440 you know

00:33:46.920 where I

00:33:47.260 came from

00:33:47.600 I couldn't

00:33:47.920 have gotten

00:33:48.220 in

00:33:48.440 but

00:33:50.660 so

00:33:53.540 so I

00:33:54.100 asked for

00:33:54.460 a clarification

00:33:55.000 from Kendi

00:33:55.760 so I

00:33:56.200 tweeted this

00:33:56.700 morning

00:33:56.980 I don't

00:33:57.880 know if

00:33:58.140 he'll

00:33:58.380 respond

00:33:59.080 I doubt

00:33:59.540 it

00:33:59.800 but

00:34:00.680 I'm

00:34:01.260 actually

00:34:01.580 curious

00:34:02.180 and I

00:34:03.780 think you

00:34:04.100 should be

00:34:04.480 too

00:34:04.780 because

00:34:06.260 what have

00:34:06.900 I told

00:34:07.220 you about

00:34:07.740 my

00:34:08.560 excitement

00:34:09.100 of being

00:34:09.760 wrong

00:34:10.220 it excites

00:34:11.720 me

00:34:12.020 I don't

00:34:13.180 run from

00:34:13.600 being wrong

00:34:14.260 if I

00:34:15.340 could learn

00:34:15.740 something

00:34:16.080 from it

00:34:16.540 and it

00:34:16.840 would

00:34:16.940 like blow

00:34:17.320 my mind

00:34:17.860 to find

00:34:18.200 that I'm

00:34:18.460 wrong

00:34:18.640 it would

00:34:19.420 blow my

00:34:19.920 mind

00:34:20.220 to find

00:34:20.640 out

00:34:20.920 that

00:34:22.080 that white

00:34:24.020 applicants

00:34:24.460 don't have

00:34:25.060 a disadvantage

00:34:25.680 in applying

00:34:26.200 to college

00:34:26.740 but maybe

00:34:28.920 maybe

00:34:29.920 I'm going to

00:34:30.280 tell you

00:34:30.520 I'm open

00:34:30.880 to the

00:34:31.120 argument

00:34:31.400 so if

00:34:32.420 Ibram

00:34:32.900 Kendi

00:34:33.320 responds

00:34:34.080 and I

00:34:34.600 doubt he

00:34:34.880 will

00:34:35.040 but if

00:34:35.780 he does

00:34:36.220 I'm open

00:34:36.700 to the

00:34:36.960 argument

00:34:37.260 it's

00:34:37.820 sort of

00:34:38.080 a data

00:34:38.520 the data

00:34:39.680 exists

00:34:40.060 or it

00:34:40.340 doesn't

00:34:41.340 and can

00:34:41.780 you find

00:34:42.220 any data

00:34:42.740 that would

00:34:43.120 suggest

00:34:43.580 that

00:34:44.740 the

00:34:45.740 discrimination

00:34:46.260 in college

00:34:47.040 applications

00:34:47.660 specifically

00:34:48.220 college

00:34:48.760 applications

00:34:49.320 can we

00:34:50.100 find that

00:34:50.520 they

00:34:50.660 discriminate

00:34:51.120 against

00:34:51.540 people

00:34:51.860 of

00:34:52.020 color

00:34:52.220 or would

00:34:53.440 we find

00:34:53.840 that they

00:34:54.160 discriminate

00:34:54.740 in favor

00:34:55.380 of people

00:34:55.820 of color

00:34:56.240 what do you

00:34:57.220 think

00:34:57.380 you would

00:34:57.980 find

00:34:58.280 what do you

00:35:00.000 think

00:35:00.240 I think

00:35:02.400 it's obvious

00:35:02.880 that they

00:35:03.300 discriminate

00:35:03.740 against white

00:35:04.640 applicants

00:35:05.160 and I

00:35:05.800 think

00:35:06.040 I think

00:35:06.660 all the

00:35:06.980 data

00:35:07.160 says that

00:35:07.960 but

00:35:09.100 if

00:35:10.480 Kendi

00:35:10.760 thinks

00:35:11.140 the

00:35:11.700 opposite

00:35:12.060 and he

00:35:12.840 he's

00:35:13.140 sort of

00:35:13.380 silent

00:35:13.660 on this

00:35:13.980 point

00:35:14.240 because I

00:35:15.220 think what

00:35:15.540 Kendi

00:35:15.800 did was

00:35:16.400 say that

00:35:16.940 Jack had

00:35:17.620 mischaracterized

00:35:18.800 his point

00:35:19.420 to make it

00:35:20.520 a larger

00:35:20.940 point than

00:35:21.480 he was

00:35:21.780 making

00:35:22.140 and that

00:35:23.120 I think

00:35:23.540 Kendi's

00:35:24.280 point is that

00:35:25.040 white applicants

00:35:25.760 were lying

00:35:26.400 not that it

00:35:28.080 worked

00:35:28.440 but that

00:35:29.180 they were

00:35:29.440 lying

00:35:29.780 so I

00:35:31.860 accept

00:35:32.500 his

00:35:33.000 clarification

00:35:33.800 if you

00:35:35.720 re-read

00:35:36.180 the tweets

00:35:36.720 it does

00:35:38.320 seem to

00:35:39.380 indicate he's

00:35:39.980 talking more

00:35:40.480 about the

00:35:40.900 lying

00:35:41.280 and does

00:35:42.300 not have

00:35:42.720 an opinion

00:35:43.120 about whether

00:35:43.700 it worked

00:35:44.240 so I

00:35:46.420 asked

00:35:46.700 what is

00:35:47.540 his opinion

00:35:48.020 did it

00:35:48.360 work

00:35:48.680 because I

00:35:49.880 think that's

00:35:50.200 important to

00:35:50.660 the story

00:35:51.020 right

00:35:51.280 and I

00:35:52.620 I'll give

00:35:53.160 him

00:35:53.400 I'll give

00:35:54.020 him credit

00:35:54.680 this far

00:35:57.000 that Jack

00:35:58.480 did extend

00:35:59.580 his point

00:36:00.300 in other

00:36:01.180 words Jack

00:36:01.740 attributed

00:36:03.160 more of a

00:36:04.120 point than

00:36:05.060 Kendi

00:36:05.620 made

00:36:06.120 and therefore

00:36:06.760 the criticism

00:36:07.480 is slightly

00:36:08.660 on a

00:36:09.120 related

00:36:10.080 very closely

00:36:10.800 related but

00:36:11.440 not quite

00:36:11.960 exactly the

00:36:12.580 same topic

00:36:13.180 you know

00:36:14.060 one is

00:36:14.460 did they

00:36:14.760 lie

00:36:15.100 and the

00:36:15.900 others

00:36:16.140 did it

00:36:16.460 work

00:36:16.800 slightly

00:36:18.060 different

00:36:18.520 but related

00:36:19.420 and I'll

00:36:21.020 give him

00:36:21.280 that I'll

00:36:21.920 give Kendi

00:36:22.360 that that

00:36:23.320 minor detail

00:36:24.000 but I

00:36:24.400 think that

00:36:24.720 he's

00:36:25.020 obligated

00:36:25.640 at this

00:36:26.040 point

00:36:26.240 because

00:36:26.520 it's a

00:36:26.840 public

00:36:27.100 exchange

00:36:27.760 I would

00:36:28.900 feel he's

00:36:29.300 obligated

00:36:29.760 to clarify

00:36:30.340 that in

00:36:32.200 addition to

00:36:32.980 the fact

00:36:34.520 that the

00:36:34.840 white people

00:36:35.260 lied

00:36:35.580 which I

00:36:35.940 think we

00:36:36.260 stipulate

00:36:36.760 right

00:36:37.140 nobody's

00:36:37.800 arguing

00:36:38.040 at that

00:36:38.300 point

00:36:38.520 does he

00:36:40.420 think that

00:36:40.880 there really

00:36:41.320 is no

00:36:41.740 advantage

00:36:42.140 to being

00:36:43.200 a person

00:36:43.580 of color

00:36:44.000 in 2021

00:36:45.080 what do

00:36:46.300 you think

00:36:46.600 to me

00:36:49.260 it looks

00:36:49.600 like it's

00:36:50.220 obviously

00:36:50.620 an advantage

00:36:51.140 I don't

00:36:51.500 I can't

00:36:52.080 even imagine

00:36:52.600 it not

00:36:53.000 be

00:36:53.220 true story

00:36:55.060 when I

00:36:55.740 was

00:36:56.680 I guess

00:36:58.000 17 or

00:36:58.660 18 I

00:36:59.100 was applying

00:37:00.000 for colleges

00:37:00.580 for the

00:37:01.000 first time

00:37:01.500 I filled

00:37:03.400 out a

00:37:04.960 document

00:37:05.360 on

00:37:05.860 ethnicity

00:37:06.740 and because

00:37:08.100 we had

00:37:08.540 been told

00:37:09.300 in my

00:37:09.980 family that

00:37:10.520 we were

00:37:10.880 part Native

00:37:11.560 American

00:37:12.100 not much

00:37:13.780 but we

00:37:15.100 were told

00:37:15.460 we had

00:37:15.800 some Native

00:37:16.180 American

00:37:16.680 it turns out

00:37:18.020 it was

00:37:18.240 not true

00:37:18.780 I have

00:37:19.680 as much

00:37:20.060 Native

00:37:20.320 American

00:37:20.740 as Elizabeth

00:37:21.420 Warren

00:37:21.820 which is

00:37:22.260 none

00:37:22.500 but apparently

00:37:23.800 it's fairly

00:37:24.260 common

00:37:24.800 and other

00:37:25.860 people have

00:37:26.280 the same

00:37:26.880 story

00:37:27.140 it was

00:37:27.760 fairly common

00:37:28.480 in my

00:37:29.160 generation

00:37:29.700 that families

00:37:31.140 were told

00:37:31.660 that they

00:37:31.980 were part

00:37:32.420 Native

00:37:32.720 American

00:37:33.160 and it

00:37:34.080 just wasn't

00:37:34.480 true

00:37:34.760 for some

00:37:35.980 reason

00:37:36.260 that was

00:37:37.020 like a

00:37:37.380 common

00:37:37.800 myth

00:37:38.240 within

00:37:38.960 families

00:37:39.480 and our

00:37:40.100 family was

00:37:40.540 one of them

00:37:41.040 so I had

00:37:42.240 my DNA

00:37:44.480 tested

00:37:45.000 I don't

00:37:45.360 have any

00:37:45.840 Native

00:37:46.220 American

00:37:46.640 blood

00:37:46.940 but at

00:37:48.860 the time

00:37:49.480 I thought

00:37:49.840 I did

00:37:50.280 and so I

00:37:51.200 thought

00:37:51.400 well wouldn't

00:37:51.800 it be

00:37:52.020 interesting

00:37:52.420 to fill

00:37:52.840 out this

00:37:53.180 application

00:37:53.720 and it

00:37:54.600 was some

00:37:55.020 generic

00:37:55.440 thing

00:37:55.760 that lots

00:37:56.360 of colleges

00:37:57.000 saw I

00:37:57.480 guess

00:37:57.660 I forget

00:37:58.600 what it

00:37:58.840 was

00:37:59.020 but I

00:37:59.520 put my

00:37:59.820 ethnicity

00:38:00.200 down

00:38:00.620 as

00:38:00.880 Native

00:38:01.140 American

00:38:01.600 and my

00:38:04.240 mailbox

00:38:04.620 blew up

00:38:05.800 with

00:38:07.460 offers

00:38:08.120 for

00:38:08.440 scholarships

00:38:08.940 and

00:38:09.480 immediate

00:38:09.860 acceptance

00:38:10.380 my

00:38:13.480 ethnicity

00:38:14.180 alone

00:38:14.780 got me

00:38:16.200 scholarship

00:38:17.660 offers

00:38:18.300 full ride

00:38:19.500 and

00:38:21.000 acceptance

00:38:21.620 that's it

00:38:23.620 they just

00:38:24.540 saw my

00:38:24.880 ethnicity

00:38:25.260 and said

00:38:25.700 yep

00:38:25.980 you're in

00:38:26.400 and probably

00:38:27.500 my high

00:38:28.520 school

00:38:28.720 grades

00:38:29.100 or something

00:38:29.520 now

00:38:30.560 that was

00:38:31.460 a long

00:38:31.720 time ago

00:38:32.200 things could

00:38:33.120 have changed

00:38:33.520 a lot

00:38:33.880 so I'm not

00:38:34.280 going to

00:38:34.500 suggest

00:38:34.860 things are

00:38:35.380 the same

00:38:35.700 but

00:38:36.540 and by

00:38:37.400 the way

00:38:37.720 just to

00:38:38.640 finish the

00:38:39.100 story

00:38:39.360 I did

00:38:40.520 not accept

00:38:41.180 any of the

00:38:41.660 offers that

00:38:42.180 were based

00:38:42.540 on that

00:38:42.880 so I did

00:38:44.240 not go to

00:38:44.760 college based

00:38:45.360 on a

00:38:45.640 fraud

00:38:45.920 but I did

00:38:47.160 fill out

00:38:47.540 a document

00:38:48.060 in a

00:38:49.140 let's say

00:38:49.540 cheeky way

00:38:50.420 that a

00:38:50.740 17 year

00:38:51.380 old might

00:38:51.860 and it was

00:38:53.120 just sort of

00:38:53.480 an experiment

00:38:53.960 I guess

00:38:54.460 and it

00:38:56.160 surprised me

00:38:56.740 I was

00:38:57.840 surprised

00:38:58.220 so let's

00:39:00.340 get to the

00:39:00.660 bottom of

00:39:00.980 that

00:39:01.120 I would

00:39:01.480 like to

00:39:01.760 hear it

00:39:02.060 if it

00:39:02.560 turns out

00:39:03.060 that I

00:39:03.960 and 100%

00:39:05.180 of every

00:39:05.740 white person

00:39:06.260 I've ever

00:39:06.660 met in my

00:39:07.080 life is

00:39:07.600 wrong

00:39:07.980 and that

00:39:09.600 actually white

00:39:10.280 people have

00:39:10.720 a big advantage

00:39:11.340 of getting

00:39:11.720 accepted into

00:39:12.420 college

00:39:12.740 if I'm

00:39:13.360 wrong about

00:39:13.800 that

00:39:14.160 I'd damn

00:39:15.760 well want

00:39:16.140 to know

00:39:16.520 wouldn't

00:39:17.360 you

00:39:17.560 could you

00:39:18.840 imagine if

00:39:19.380 you were

00:39:19.640 wrong about

00:39:20.080 that

00:39:20.340 this is a

00:39:22.100 good

00:39:22.320 exercise

00:39:23.660 to keep

00:39:25.080 you free

00:39:26.120 from at

00:39:26.600 least a

00:39:26.860 little bit

00:39:27.160 free from

00:39:27.660 cognitive

00:39:28.160 dissonance

00:39:28.680 because cognitive

00:39:30.260 dissonance

00:39:30.780 kicks in when

00:39:31.380 you find out

00:39:31.820 you're wrong

00:39:32.220 about something

00:39:32.800 so it

00:39:34.320 helps to

00:39:35.320 protect yourself

00:39:36.020 against that

00:39:36.620 to just

00:39:37.160 play it

00:39:38.100 through with

00:39:38.380 your mind

00:39:38.780 like what

00:39:39.240 would it

00:39:39.500 feel like

00:39:39.920 to be

00:39:40.180 wrong

00:39:40.440 about that

00:39:40.960 like something

00:39:42.340 really basic

00:39:43.200 that you

00:39:43.540 thought was

00:39:43.920 true about

00:39:44.420 the world

00:39:44.880 and what

00:39:45.500 if you're

00:39:45.800 wrong

00:39:46.100 it would

00:39:47.380 kind of

00:39:47.640 blow your

00:39:47.980 mind

00:39:48.200 wouldn't

00:39:48.400 it

00:39:48.600 and I

00:39:50.160 think

00:39:50.540 that if

00:39:51.380 you're an

00:39:51.720 honest

00:39:52.240 you know

00:39:53.380 participant

00:39:53.900 in these

00:39:54.400 conversations

00:39:55.020 you should

00:39:55.860 at least

00:39:56.260 give the

00:39:57.360 other side

00:39:57.840 the courtesy

00:39:58.420 of saying

00:39:59.340 you know

00:39:59.600 I could

00:39:59.860 be wrong

00:40:00.240 let's hear

00:40:01.520 what you

00:40:01.760 got

00:40:01.980 and I'm

00:40:02.740 going to

00:40:02.900 do that

00:40:03.240 in this

00:40:03.480 case

00:40:03.740 because

00:40:04.700 I don't

00:40:05.900 know if

00:40:06.080 you know

00:40:06.300 this but

00:40:06.700 Ibram

00:40:07.000 Kendi

00:40:07.220 is really

00:40:07.600 smart

00:40:07.980 did you

00:40:09.520 know that

00:40:09.960 did he

00:40:11.740 win a

00:40:12.220 MacArthur

00:40:12.620 award or

00:40:13.380 something like

00:40:13.680 that

00:40:13.840 but I

00:40:14.300 think he's

00:40:14.780 genuinely

00:40:15.680 like seriously

00:40:16.780 smart

00:40:17.260 so if he

00:40:18.640 says that

00:40:19.160 something is

00:40:19.640 true that I

00:40:20.180 think is not

00:40:20.640 true and

00:40:21.140 it happens to

00:40:21.880 be his

00:40:22.240 domain of

00:40:23.440 expertise

00:40:23.940 I could

00:40:25.200 be influenced

00:40:26.240 I could

00:40:27.460 change my

00:40:27.900 mind on

00:40:28.260 that

00:40:28.440 so

00:40:29.820 I'd like to

00:40:32.280 hear his

00:40:32.540 argument

00:40:32.820 sincerely

00:40:33.820 I think it'd

00:40:34.440 be interesting

00:40:34.860 whether it's a

00:40:35.800 good or bad

00:40:36.220 argument

00:40:36.540 I figure he's a

00:40:37.800 smart person

00:40:38.380 with something

00:40:39.460 to say

00:40:39.900 I'd like to

00:40:40.540 hear it

00:40:41.080 how much

00:40:41.740 would you

00:40:41.980 like to

00:40:42.280 hear me

00:40:43.260 having an

00:40:43.840 interview with

00:40:44.460 Ibram

00:40:45.320 Kendi

00:40:45.800 how much

00:40:47.920 would you

00:40:48.180 like that

00:40:48.640 I think

00:40:49.820 I think

00:40:50.500 some of

00:40:50.860 you would

00:40:51.080 hate it

00:40:51.400 as much

00:40:51.700 as you

00:40:51.960 liked it

00:40:52.420 because the

00:40:53.080 problem would

00:40:53.520 be I

00:40:53.880 would give

00:40:54.220 too much

00:40:54.560 respect to

00:40:55.160 his opinion

00:40:55.600 and you

00:40:56.140 don't like

00:40:56.500 his opinion

00:40:56.980 but I

00:40:58.460 wouldn't

00:40:58.740 interview

00:40:59.140 anybody

00:40:59.640 unless I

00:41:00.200 gave them

00:41:00.540 full respect

00:41:01.240 to their

00:41:02.140 opinion

00:41:02.700 otherwise

00:41:04.580 why would

00:41:05.040 I have

00:41:05.260 Mara

00:41:05.560 I'm not

00:41:06.280 going to

00:41:06.420 have somebody

00:41:06.820 on who's

00:41:07.120 just a

00:41:07.420 clown

00:41:07.680 right

00:41:07.980 I'm

00:41:09.080 going to

00:41:09.340 respect

00:41:09.680 the

00:41:09.880 opinion

00:41:10.140 or I'm

00:41:10.460 not

00:41:10.600 going to

00:41:10.840 have an

00:41:11.260 interview

00:41:11.560 would you

00:41:14.820 express

00:41:15.260 your opinion

00:41:15.920 of his

00:41:16.260 opinion

00:41:16.540 I just

00:41:16.900 did

00:41:17.160 I just

00:41:18.560 did

00:41:18.860 I'll give

00:41:20.780 you

00:41:20.920 well maybe

00:41:21.560 I can

00:41:21.840 extend that

00:41:22.380 I'll make

00:41:22.640 it larger

00:41:23.020 here's my

00:41:24.020 opinion

00:41:24.520 of I

00:41:26.520 guess the

00:41:26.920 the Kendi

00:41:27.480 view of

00:41:29.100 the world

00:41:29.440 I think he

00:41:31.040 would say

00:41:31.400 that the

00:41:31.900 structural or

00:41:32.780 systemic

00:41:33.260 racism is

00:41:34.260 real and

00:41:35.240 so do I

00:41:35.740 I would

00:41:37.360 say that

00:41:37.820 the place

00:41:38.240 that you

00:41:38.520 can fix

00:41:39.100 it

00:41:39.340 the place

00:41:40.140 that has

00:41:40.400 the biggest

00:41:40.760 lever is

00:41:41.980 in the

00:41:42.260 school

00:41:42.520 system

00:41:42.960 and that

00:41:44.180 we should

00:41:44.480 target that

00:41:45.180 collectively

00:41:45.840 because both

00:41:47.020 you know

00:41:47.520 basically every

00:41:48.700 ethnicity benefits

00:41:50.340 when you fix

00:41:50.900 the bad

00:41:51.280 schools

00:41:51.680 but the

00:41:53.000 black population

00:41:53.720 probably the

00:41:54.260 most just

00:41:54.940 because where

00:41:55.320 people live

00:41:55.920 and how bad

00:41:56.380 the schools

00:41:56.740 are

00:41:56.940 so we

00:41:58.260 can certainly

00:41:58.620 agree on

00:41:59.080 that

00:41:59.440 I mean

00:42:00.240 that's

00:42:00.420 pretty big

00:42:00.900 systemic

00:42:01.400 racism

00:42:01.920 I would

00:42:02.300 say

00:42:02.520 and the

00:42:04.520 other

00:42:04.700 arguments

00:42:05.100 about

00:42:05.340 systemic

00:42:05.800 racism

00:42:06.240 is that

00:42:06.920 anybody

00:42:07.520 who has

00:42:07.860 a head

00:42:08.160 start

00:42:08.600 has an

00:42:10.020 advantage

00:42:10.320 how do

00:42:11.540 you disagree

00:42:11.940 with that

00:42:12.460 do you

00:42:14.520 disagree

00:42:14.940 with the

00:42:15.700 notion

00:42:16.360 that if

00:42:16.900 you have

00:42:17.140 a head

00:42:17.440 start

00:42:17.840 it's an

00:42:19.120 advantage

00:42:19.540 who disagrees

00:42:21.700 with that

00:42:22.100 and I

00:42:23.440 would say

00:42:23.760 that you

00:42:24.520 know the

00:42:24.720 legacy of

00:42:25.320 slavery

00:42:25.640 did give

00:42:26.980 you know

00:42:27.420 some white

00:42:27.920 families a

00:42:28.720 head start

00:42:29.520 not all

00:42:30.360 of them

00:42:30.660 and as soon

00:42:31.400 as you say

00:42:31.740 it's about

00:42:32.080 all white

00:42:32.540 people it's

00:42:32.960 just stupid

00:42:33.480 right

00:42:35.600 if you were

00:42:36.220 born into

00:42:36.660 a poor

00:42:37.040 white family

00:42:37.660 the legacy

00:42:39.040 of being

00:42:40.140 white didn't

00:42:40.620 help you

00:42:40.940 as much

00:42:41.260 as it

00:42:41.520 should

00:42:41.680 have

00:42:41.860 but

00:42:43.180 now I

00:42:44.140 think he

00:42:44.420 would argue

00:42:44.800 that even

00:42:46.060 if you're

00:42:46.420 born a

00:42:46.880 poor white

00:42:47.440 person and

00:42:48.060 got no

00:42:48.820 specific

00:42:49.400 advantage

00:42:49.920 that the

00:42:51.020 system would

00:42:51.540 also give

00:42:52.060 you advantages

00:42:52.620 just for the

00:42:53.780 color of your

00:42:54.280 skin

00:42:54.520 that part

00:42:56.160 is part

00:42:57.380 true

00:42:57.660 and part

00:42:58.760 false

00:42:59.140 I do

00:43:00.620 believe that

00:43:01.140 there are

00:43:01.400 situations in

00:43:02.220 which being

00:43:03.420 white would

00:43:03.880 give you an

00:43:04.260 advantage

00:43:04.660 in American

00:43:05.420 society

00:43:06.000 for example

00:43:07.780 do you think

00:43:09.160 that people

00:43:09.680 suspect me

00:43:11.120 of shoplifting

00:43:11.880 as much

00:43:13.140 as a

00:43:14.260 black man

00:43:14.860 of the

00:43:15.220 same age

00:43:15.740 let's say

00:43:16.280 at the

00:43:16.720 same age

00:43:17.240 any age

00:43:17.820 do you

00:43:18.540 think I

00:43:18.860 would have

00:43:19.060 been suspected

00:43:19.800 of shoplifting

00:43:21.280 at the

00:43:21.820 same level

00:43:22.780 probably not

00:43:23.880 so that

00:43:24.440 would be

00:43:24.700 advantage

00:43:25.440 Scott

00:43:26.000 right

00:43:26.280 but

00:43:27.360 if I

00:43:28.160 were to

00:43:28.380 apply for

00:43:28.780 a job

00:43:29.240 at a

00:43:30.100 fortune 500

00:43:30.760 company

00:43:31.240 who would

00:43:33.000 yeah I know

00:43:34.300 I'm too old

00:43:34.760 for the

00:43:35.120 shoplifting

00:43:35.620 example

00:43:36.300 but if

00:43:36.960 I'm adjusting

00:43:37.660 it for my

00:43:38.280 younger self

00:43:38.960 you seem

00:43:43.660 pretty crafty

00:43:44.540 I don't know

00:43:45.740 what that means

00:43:46.240 is that good

00:43:47.000 or bad

00:43:47.380 do you sport

00:43:48.440 critical race

00:43:49.680 theory

00:43:50.220 no

00:43:52.820 critical race

00:43:53.660 theory is

00:43:54.400 just propaganda

00:43:55.180 and brainwashing

00:43:56.100 and

00:43:57.040 probably 80%

00:43:59.080 stupid

00:43:59.600 based on

00:44:01.080 20%

00:44:01.840 pretty good

00:44:02.420 stuff

00:44:02.900 so I

00:44:04.620 don't

00:44:04.860 disagree

00:44:05.280 with the

00:44:05.800 base

00:44:06.120 assumptions

00:44:06.720 most of

00:44:07.740 them

00:44:07.880 some of

00:44:08.480 them

00:44:08.520 I do

00:44:08.780 but the

00:44:09.520 base

00:44:09.760 assumptions

00:44:10.200 that there

00:44:10.680 is some

00:44:10.920 inequality

00:44:11.480 because of

00:44:12.480 head starts

00:44:13.180 etc

00:44:13.500 I just

00:44:14.320 disagree

00:44:14.800 that it's

00:44:15.260 important

00:44:15.760 and where

00:44:17.360 you would

00:44:17.740 start

00:44:18.200 now the

00:44:19.200 important

00:44:19.580 part

00:44:19.960 is if

00:44:20.880 the world

00:44:21.300 gives

00:44:21.580 everybody

00:44:22.060 you know

00:44:23.280 good

00:44:23.920 advantages

00:44:24.440 then it's

00:44:25.360 not

00:44:25.540 important

00:44:25.920 history

00:44:27.100 doesn't matter

00:44:27.760 because you

00:44:28.160 can't change

00:44:28.640 it

00:44:28.900 right

00:44:29.640 you're here

00:44:30.160 now

00:44:30.540 if you're

00:44:31.440 here now

00:44:31.900 with the

00:44:32.180 same

00:44:32.360 opportunity

00:44:32.900 as every

00:44:33.840 other poor

00:44:34.320 person

00:44:34.700 I feel

00:44:36.540 like I'm

00:44:36.960 done

00:44:37.220 you know

00:44:37.760 you don't

00:44:38.080 need to

00:44:38.560 talk anymore

00:44:39.080 about it

00:44:39.660 as long as

00:44:40.500 you gave

00:44:40.780 everybody an

00:44:41.320 opportunity

00:44:41.720 but as long

00:44:42.580 as the

00:44:42.800 school system

00:44:43.420 is garbage

00:44:44.060 for black

00:44:45.140 people

00:44:45.440 specifically

00:44:46.160 and others

00:44:47.560 but you know

00:44:48.340 more so

00:44:49.060 who doesn't

00:44:51.600 want to fix

00:44:51.980 that

00:44:52.240 who doesn't

00:44:53.600 want to fix

00:44:54.020 that

00:44:54.280 and that's

00:44:54.700 mostly the

00:44:55.320 teachers unions

00:44:56.080 are the problem

00:44:56.640 stop telling

00:44:59.940 people they're

00:45:00.640 screwed from

00:45:01.400 the get go

00:45:01.920 yeah you

00:45:02.560 don't want to

00:45:02.940 tell people

00:45:03.320 they're going

00:45:03.640 to lose

00:45:03.960 because the

00:45:04.540 way they

00:45:04.840 were born

00:45:05.260 that is

00:45:06.920 a bad

00:45:07.580 strategy

00:45:08.140 did you

00:45:10.640 look at

00:45:10.940 the Craig

00:45:11.640 Wright

00:45:12.040 now

00:45:13.160 why is

00:45:15.680 this is

00:45:16.600 this just

00:45:16.980 a Twitter

00:45:17.320 thing I've

00:45:18.040 not seen

00:45:18.440 anything in

00:45:19.060 the news

00:45:19.520 about Craig

00:45:20.340 Wright or

00:45:20.900 Satoshi

00:45:21.780 anything

00:45:22.380 is there

00:45:24.000 somebody tweet

00:45:25.120 me a news

00:45:25.680 article on

00:45:26.140 that I've

00:45:26.400 seen nothing

00:45:26.800 on that

00:45:27.220 in the

00:45:27.560 news

00:45:27.940 I've only

00:45:28.580 the only

00:45:29.200 place I've

00:45:29.600 ever seen

00:45:29.900 it is in

00:45:30.920 the comments

00:45:31.420 here

00:45:32.100 somebody's

00:45:36.360 saying most

00:45:36.700 of the

00:45:36.900 shop listeners

00:45:37.480 I've witnessed

00:45:38.280 running for

00:45:38.800 stores were

00:45:39.380 either young

00:45:39.800 white males

00:45:40.440 or white

00:45:41.980 women

00:45:42.300 in my

00:45:43.780 town

00:45:44.100 my town

00:45:45.460 is

00:45:45.780 upscale

00:45:47.380 town in

00:45:47.900 California

00:45:48.340 I would

00:45:49.640 say our

00:45:50.240 ethnic

00:45:50.920 breakdown

00:45:51.360 is probably

00:45:52.520 60%

00:45:55.060 white

00:45:55.900 30%

00:45:58.500 Indian

00:45:59.520 Asian

00:45:59.920 whatever

00:46:00.240 you know

00:46:00.820 however you

00:46:01.440 want to

00:46:01.660 slice that

00:46:02.260 and maybe

00:46:03.400 10%

00:46:04.000 black

00:46:04.380 something like

00:46:04.800 that

00:46:04.960 so that

00:46:05.480 would be

00:46:05.840 you know

00:46:06.240 the town

00:46:06.560 I live

00:46:06.900 in

00:46:07.200 and I

00:46:10.360 would say

00:46:10.660 nearly 100%

00:46:11.740 of the

00:46:12.120 shoplifters

00:46:12.800 are white

00:46:13.420 nearly 100%

00:46:15.940 because here

00:46:18.640 it's almost

00:46:20.240 like an

00:46:20.860 after school

00:46:21.620 sport

00:46:24.360 the kids

00:46:25.660 leave the

00:46:26.060 school

00:46:26.280 they go

00:46:26.620 to the

00:46:26.900 local

00:46:27.360 grocery

00:46:29.240 store

00:46:29.620 and they

00:46:30.120 shove

00:46:30.780 stuff in

00:46:31.320 their

00:46:31.460 pockets

00:46:31.780 and they

00:46:32.100 walk

00:46:32.300 out

00:46:32.580 because like

00:46:33.620 everywhere

00:46:33.920 else

00:46:34.300 the penalty

00:46:35.660 is so

00:46:36.320 small

00:46:36.780 or non-existent

00:46:38.240 that

00:46:39.280 yeah

00:46:40.000 right

00:46:40.560 I don't

00:46:40.900 live in

00:46:41.180 Oakland

00:46:41.400 you're

00:46:41.680 correct

00:46:41.980 so

00:46:43.680 I think

00:46:44.960 the

00:46:45.300 majority

00:46:45.920 of

00:46:46.280 shoplifters

00:46:46.940 is whatever

00:46:47.440 the majority

00:46:48.040 of people

00:46:48.480 in your

00:46:48.780 town

00:46:49.000 is

00:46:49.300 all right

00:46:55.880 free

00:46:56.500 range

00:46:56.780 shopping

00:46:57.860 people with

00:47:01.520 trauma

00:47:01.880 from neglect

00:47:02.680 or abuse

00:47:03.180 are more

00:47:03.520 likely to

00:47:04.080 steal

00:47:04.400 says

00:47:04.760 somebody

00:47:05.180 I don't

00:47:06.480 know

00:47:06.720 is there

00:47:07.580 any data

00:47:08.220 to back

00:47:08.560 that up

00:47:09.020 yeah

00:47:13.320 all right

00:47:14.720 far more

00:47:16.040 poor people

00:47:16.580 are criminals

00:47:17.120 well that

00:47:17.480 makes sense

00:47:18.040 they should

00:47:18.600 be

00:47:19.300 CVS

00:47:20.840 shut down

00:47:21.240 five stores

00:47:21.880 I don't

00:47:22.240 know if

00:47:22.460 that's real

00:47:22.980 or they

00:47:23.440 were shutting

00:47:23.900 down stores

00:47:24.420 in general

00:47:24.860 that CVS

00:47:26.840 story is a

00:47:27.260 little murky

00:47:27.780 because we

00:47:29.020 don't know

00:47:29.280 if they

00:47:29.480 were going

00:47:29.700 to shut

00:47:29.960 some stores

00:47:30.500 anyway

00:47:30.800 all right

00:47:33.280 that is

00:47:35.240 about what

00:47:35.780 I had to

00:47:36.260 talk about

00:47:36.660 today

00:47:37.060 and

00:47:38.320 do you

00:47:40.520 believe the

00:47:41.020 rich slaves

00:47:42.040 got to

00:47:42.400 keep their

00:47:42.780 money

00:47:43.060 well

00:47:44.200 here's

00:47:45.220 here's the

00:47:45.940 provocative

00:47:46.560 way that

00:47:47.440 you would

00:47:47.800 analyze

00:47:48.520 reparations

00:47:49.640 I've said

00:47:50.360 this before

00:47:50.900 but if

00:47:51.360 somebody's

00:47:51.700 new to

00:47:51.960 it

00:47:52.180 if you

00:47:54.940 were going

00:47:55.280 to do

00:47:55.620 an honest

00:47:56.280 economic

00:47:56.960 analysis

00:47:57.480 of reparations

00:47:58.360 what would

00:47:58.980 you compare

00:47:59.680 the

00:48:00.900 let's say

00:48:02.020 the black

00:48:02.640 experience

00:48:03.680 and what

00:48:04.340 they got

00:48:04.760 and didn't

00:48:05.120 get

00:48:05.380 through

00:48:06.200 slavery

00:48:06.700 etc

00:48:07.000 what would

00:48:07.980 you compare

00:48:08.380 it to

00:48:08.800 if you

00:48:10.200 compare it

00:48:10.640 to the

00:48:10.900 white people

00:48:11.460 in America

00:48:12.400 which is

00:48:13.100 the way

00:48:13.600 it's being

00:48:13.900 done

00:48:14.200 then it

00:48:15.040 looks like

00:48:15.340 there's a

00:48:15.720 gigantic

00:48:16.100 disparity

00:48:16.740 and very

00:48:17.620 unfair

00:48:17.940 but if

00:48:19.540 you compared

00:48:20.040 it to

00:48:20.420 the actual

00:48:21.060 alternative

00:48:21.660 which is

00:48:22.860 never being

00:48:23.440 slaves

00:48:23.960 the actual

00:48:25.200 comparison

00:48:25.780 would be

00:48:26.480 to people

00:48:27.280 who stayed

00:48:27.740 in Africa

00:48:28.240 and just

00:48:29.220 continued

00:48:29.760 living their

00:48:30.360 normal life

00:48:30.960 in Africa

00:48:31.360 that's the

00:48:32.740 comparison

00:48:33.140 for financial

00:48:33.920 reasons

00:48:34.360 now for

00:48:35.660 abuse

00:48:37.460 and

00:48:38.620 you know

00:48:39.400 the slavery

00:48:40.180 part

00:48:40.600 that of

00:48:41.780 course

00:48:42.060 you know

00:48:42.820 you could

00:48:43.120 you could

00:48:43.520 make an

00:48:43.940 argument

00:48:44.180 for

00:48:44.520 compensation

00:48:45.500 for that

00:48:46.300 but I

00:48:47.160 don't know

00:48:47.600 that you

00:48:47.860 could make

00:48:48.260 a rational

00:48:49.740 argument

00:48:50.160 that black

00:48:52.140 people were

00:48:52.760 were stolen

00:48:54.000 from

00:48:54.460 except for

00:48:56.280 their freedom

00:48:56.860 I mean

00:48:57.420 that's

00:48:58.080 obviously

00:48:58.840 bigger than

00:48:59.320 money

00:48:59.580 but

00:49:00.520 financially

00:49:01.840 I don't

00:49:02.200 think it's

00:49:02.560 a stealing

00:49:03.220 situation

00:49:03.860 because you

00:49:04.800 would compare

00:49:05.240 it to what

00:49:05.620 their alternative

00:49:06.180 was which

00:49:06.880 may be even

00:49:07.800 worse

00:49:08.160 not worse

00:49:09.280 than slavery

00:49:09.780 but once

00:49:11.380 once slavery

00:49:12.180 was ended

00:49:12.740 if you would

00:49:13.520 have to compare

00:49:14.100 them through

00:49:14.540 history

00:49:14.960 I don't know

00:49:15.900 who would

00:49:16.220 do better

00:49:16.600 would a

00:49:17.700 would a

00:49:18.080 black man

00:49:18.740 in 1965

00:49:20.160 America

00:49:21.480 have more

00:49:22.780 or less

00:49:23.440 money and

00:49:25.160 freedom

00:49:25.460 than the

00:49:26.160 African

00:49:26.680 source

00:49:29.300 tribe

00:49:30.600 or whatever

00:49:30.980 it was

00:49:31.360 for wherever

00:49:31.800 he came

00:49:32.160 culture

00:49:32.640 I don't

00:49:33.600 know

00:49:33.820 but obviously

00:49:37.280 you could

00:49:37.600 make the

00:49:37.920 argument that

00:49:38.500 the slavery

00:49:39.520 itself requires

00:49:40.400 reparations

00:49:41.000 independent of

00:49:42.100 any finances

00:49:42.880 now I'm not

00:49:45.160 I'm not saying

00:49:45.920 it's a good

00:49:46.300 idea but you

00:49:46.840 could make

00:49:47.180 the argument

00:49:47.880 and I

00:49:48.460 think it

00:49:49.260 has been

00:49:49.580 made

00:49:49.800 and yes

00:49:52.860 black Africans

00:49:53.640 enslaved

00:49:54.180 other Africans

00:49:54.900 yeah slavery

00:49:55.900 is a universal

00:49:56.960 historical

00:49:57.680 thing

00:49:58.420 everybody

00:49:58.900 enslaved

00:49:59.360 everybody

00:49:59.780 basically

00:50:00.640 everybody

00:50:01.140 who could

00:50:01.880 enslave

00:50:02.300 somebody

00:50:02.660 did

00:50:02.940 that's

00:50:04.600 pretty much

00:50:05.040 the whole

00:50:05.320 thing

00:50:05.540 if you

00:50:05.920 could

00:50:06.260 well you

00:50:07.240 did

00:50:07.540 yes

00:50:12.420 and as

00:50:12.860 as the

00:50:13.780 comments are

00:50:14.200 saying it's

00:50:14.560 more than

00:50:14.860 slavery

00:50:15.300 because of

00:50:16.180 the Jim Crow

00:50:16.800 laws and

00:50:17.420 the discrimination

00:50:18.140 through life

00:50:18.720 yeah I

00:50:19.420 definitely

00:50:20.360 empathize

00:50:22.400 with the

00:50:22.760 argument

00:50:23.080 that they

00:50:25.160 were suffering

00:50:25.680 however

00:50:26.660 most of

00:50:28.380 the people

00:50:28.740 who suffered

00:50:29.460 you know

00:50:31.000 the worst

00:50:31.820 abuses

00:50:32.340 have already

00:50:33.040 passed

00:50:33.520 but there

00:50:34.500 are plenty

00:50:34.760 of people

00:50:35.080 alive

00:50:35.460 who went

00:50:36.460 through

00:50:36.740 you know

00:50:37.120 the worst

00:50:38.640 of the

00:50:38.940 earlier

00:50:39.240 discrimination

00:50:39.840 in the

00:50:41.180 last hundred

00:50:41.640 years

00:50:42.000 if Kendi

00:50:47.140 is correct

00:50:47.760 why aren't

00:50:48.380 minority

00:50:48.860 applicants

00:50:49.340 lying to

00:50:49.960 say they

00:50:50.320 are white

00:50:50.740 I can answer

00:50:51.500 that

00:50:51.760 I can

00:50:52.300 answer

00:50:52.560 it for

00:50:52.900 Kendi

00:50:53.220 if his

00:50:54.640 belief is

00:50:55.220 that the

00:50:55.580 white

00:50:56.040 applicants

00:50:56.560 are wrong

00:50:57.480 that they

00:50:59.360 don't get

00:50:59.720 and they

00:51:00.180 don't get

00:51:00.500 any advantage

00:51:00.980 from saying

00:51:01.560 they're people

00:51:02.180 of color

00:51:02.600 it means

00:51:03.440 that students

00:51:04.460 can be wrong

00:51:05.900 about what

00:51:06.440 works and

00:51:06.860 what doesn't

00:51:07.380 so that's

00:51:08.220 your answer

00:51:08.620 you're saying

00:51:09.700 why aren't

00:51:10.120 the students

00:51:10.640 acting rationally

00:51:11.660 if they

00:51:12.080 could get

00:51:12.400 an advantage

00:51:12.920 by doing

00:51:13.560 X

00:51:13.960 and I'm

00:51:14.640 saying his

00:51:15.520 argument is

00:51:16.100 that the

00:51:16.420 students are

00:51:16.860 not acting

00:51:17.360 rationally

00:51:17.880 they're acting

00:51:19.100 poorly

00:51:19.540 but I

00:51:21.380 believe his

00:51:21.880 argument would

00:51:22.400 be they're

00:51:22.740 not acting

00:51:23.340 in their

00:51:23.700 best interest

00:51:24.320 they just

00:51:25.060 don't realize

00:51:25.620 it and

00:51:26.640 that would

00:51:26.900 apply to

00:51:27.360 any kid

00:51:28.380 hello all

00:51:31.780 you clankers

00:51:32.460 now do

00:51:34.360 you clankers

00:51:34.980 come over

00:51:35.480 because there

00:51:38.400 was a retweet

00:51:39.140 or another

00:51:39.880 another podcast

00:51:41.100 ended

00:51:41.480 oh it's a

00:51:48.220 raid from

00:51:48.900 Stixenhammer

00:51:49.980 what does

00:51:50.620 that mean

00:51:50.940 a raid

00:51:51.420 does that

00:51:52.720 mean that

00:51:53.240 he tweeted

00:51:53.980 something

00:51:54.500 and so

00:51:54.960 you all

00:51:55.240 came over

00:51:55.600 here

00:51:55.820 or does

00:51:56.900 it mean

00:51:57.120 that his

00:51:57.440 program

00:51:57.820 just ended

00:51:58.300 and you're

00:51:58.920 coming to

00:51:59.260 another

00:51:59.480 program

00:51:59.880 I don't

00:52:01.380 know what

00:52:01.760 any of that

00:52:02.100 means

00:52:02.440 just saying

00:52:03.680 hi

00:52:03.940 hi

00:52:04.920 oh the

00:52:09.960 clankers are

00:52:10.620 liking the

00:52:11.160 stream

00:52:11.460 Stix is live

00:52:13.340 and he sends

00:52:13.920 them

00:52:14.100 oh okay

00:52:14.600 well that

00:52:16.280 is

00:52:16.560 that is

00:52:18.500 very nice

00:52:19.140 of him

00:52:19.460 tell him

00:52:20.220 I said

00:52:20.520 thanks

00:52:20.940 and

00:52:22.180 all right

00:52:26.760 good

00:52:27.140 good to

00:52:28.940 know

00:52:29.140 all right

00:52:29.780 thanks for

00:52:30.160 watching

00:52:30.440 we didn't

00:52:31.700 have too

00:52:32.060 much news

00:52:32.660 today

00:52:33.040 because

00:52:33.540 maybe

00:52:34.180 because

00:52:34.480 it's

00:52:34.600 Halloween

00:52:34.860 so go

00:52:35.780 out and

00:52:35.940 have a

00:52:36.340 I will

00:52:38.080 talk about

00:52:38.700 decentral

00:52:40.080 land

00:52:40.680 I see

00:52:42.900 in the

00:52:43.160 comments

00:52:43.480 I'm being

00:52:43.800 prompted

00:52:44.140 to do

00:52:44.460 that

00:52:44.640 but not

00:52:45.140 today

00:52:45.440 but I

00:52:46.660 will talk

00:52:47.000 about that

00:52:47.420 and

00:52:48.860 did I

00:52:51.320 mention

00:52:51.560 the

00:52:51.800 Southwest

00:52:52.180 pilot

00:52:52.920 oh there

00:52:54.060 was a

00:52:54.340 Southwest

00:52:54.660 pilot

00:52:55.060 for

00:52:55.400 saying

00:52:56.800 let's

00:52:57.900 go

00:52:58.060 Brandon

00:52:58.480 I guess

00:52:59.560 he got

00:52:59.780 fired

00:53:00.080 you know

00:53:00.760 I don't

00:53:01.120 disagree

00:53:01.460 with that

00:53:01.880 I don't

00:53:02.740 disagree

00:53:03.060 with that

00:53:03.380 firing

00:53:03.680 I don't

00:53:04.300 think

00:53:04.480 that firing

00:53:05.100 was

00:53:05.800 inappropriate

00:53:07.220 I'm sorry

00:53:10.280 I think

00:53:11.840 the employer

00:53:12.300 can do

00:53:12.680 anything

00:53:12.960 they want

00:53:13.540 in protecting

00:53:14.580 their brand

00:53:15.260 and if

00:53:16.100 they thought

00:53:16.440 that was

00:53:16.720 bad for

00:53:17.160 the brand

00:53:17.540 they might

00:53:17.940 be right

00:53:18.300 they might

00:53:18.660 be wrong

00:53:19.060 but it's

00:53:20.240 their call

00:53:21.080 was that

00:53:22.060 good for

00:53:22.480 the brand

00:53:22.840 or bad

00:53:23.220 for the

00:53:23.480 brand

00:53:23.700 and I

00:53:24.280 don't

00:53:24.400 think

00:53:24.620 putting

00:53:24.880 politics

00:53:25.400 on a

00:53:25.720 plane

00:53:26.060 is good

00:53:26.960 for

00:53:27.140 safety

00:53:27.560 think

00:53:29.200 about

00:53:29.440 it

00:53:29.680 what

00:53:30.560 happens

00:53:30.980 when

00:53:31.260 you hear

00:53:31.580 a

00:53:31.700 political

00:53:32.140 something

00:53:32.920 obviously

00:53:34.540 political

00:53:35.180 from your

00:53:36.080 pilot

00:53:36.460 do you

00:53:38.100 think that

00:53:38.640 gets the

00:53:39.040 passengers

00:53:39.520 talking to

00:53:40.120 each other

00:53:40.520 and arguing

00:53:42.180 about whether

00:53:42.760 that was

00:53:43.300 right or

00:53:44.040 wrong

00:53:44.320 and suddenly

00:53:45.400 the plane

00:53:46.000 figures out

00:53:46.660 who's a

00:53:47.720 Trump supporter

00:53:48.320 and who's

00:53:49.500 not

00:53:49.780 and then you

00:53:50.660 have to be

00:53:51.100 on a flight

00:53:51.500 together for

00:53:52.140 however long

00:53:53.120 I think

00:53:54.560 it was

00:53:54.720 dangerous

00:53:55.140 I think

00:53:56.420 it was

00:53:56.660 literally

00:53:57.060 a safety

00:53:57.640 problem

00:53:58.140 to interject

00:53:59.340 politics

00:54:00.020 in 2021

00:54:00.860 on a

00:54:02.120 plane

00:54:02.500 where people

00:54:03.400 are in

00:54:04.280 a confined

00:54:05.000 space

00:54:05.420 so I'm

00:54:06.460 going to

00:54:06.640 back the

00:54:07.120 airlines

00:54:07.660 for firing

00:54:09.440 any pilot

00:54:10.080 who makes

00:54:10.560 a blatant

00:54:11.500 one-sided

00:54:13.240 political

00:54:13.940 statement

00:54:14.420 sorry

00:54:17.340 because remember

00:54:19.920 the airline

00:54:20.380 has rights

00:54:20.920 too

00:54:21.260 I'm very

00:54:23.400 much in

00:54:23.780 favor of

00:54:24.320 free speech

00:54:24.940 and of

00:54:25.340 course

00:54:25.600 especially

00:54:26.400 provocative

00:54:27.020 free speech

00:54:27.700 but you

00:54:28.540 don't get

00:54:28.880 to do it

00:54:29.260 everywhere

00:54:29.680 right

00:54:30.660 you don't

00:54:31.040 get to

00:54:31.760 embarrass

00:54:32.200 your employer

00:54:32.800 or create

00:54:33.620 safety problems

00:54:34.600 I would say

00:54:35.880 that a

00:54:36.440 pilot

00:54:36.820 interjecting

00:54:37.940 let's go

00:54:39.900 Brandon

00:54:40.340 was similar

00:54:42.760 not completely

00:54:44.100 the same

00:54:44.780 I know

00:54:45.360 there are

00:54:45.720 differences

00:54:46.100 similar

00:54:47.340 to yelling

00:54:48.600 fire in a

00:54:49.320 crowded theater

00:54:50.000 because the

00:54:51.980 risk of

00:54:53.080 violence

00:54:53.500 from that

00:54:54.080 statement

00:54:54.560 in an

00:54:55.800 enclosed

00:54:56.060 space

00:54:56.580 where people

00:54:57.020 can't just

00:54:57.480 leave

00:54:57.880 is non-zero

00:54:59.740 it's not

00:55:00.820 zero

00:55:01.240 I mean

00:55:02.120 the fire

00:55:03.020 example would

00:55:03.580 be more

00:55:04.160 dangerous

00:55:04.580 I think

00:55:04.980 but it's

00:55:05.700 not zero

00:55:06.220 and I

00:55:07.040 can see

00:55:07.520 the airline

00:55:07.980 saying

00:55:08.400 we want

00:55:09.100 our safety

00:55:09.540 record to

00:55:10.760 be spotless

00:55:12.100 do you

00:55:13.200 want your

00:55:13.640 airplane to

00:55:15.280 be casual

00:55:15.920 about safety

00:55:16.700 you don't

00:55:19.360 right

00:55:19.620 it's the

00:55:20.600 same

00:55:20.780 let me

00:55:22.100 give an

00:55:22.360 analogy

00:55:22.780 that you

00:55:23.100 can hate

00:55:23.500 analogies

00:55:26.260 are not

00:55:26.540 persuasive

00:55:27.060 because you'll

00:55:27.600 just argue

00:55:28.040 about the

00:55:28.420 analogy

00:55:28.760 but it's

00:55:31.020 too much

00:55:31.360 fun

00:55:31.640 so I'm

00:55:32.500 going to

00:55:32.640 do it

00:55:32.840 anyway

00:55:33.080 what did

00:55:34.480 gun owners

00:55:35.020 say when

00:55:35.680 Alec Baldwin

00:55:36.300 supporters

00:55:37.960 said

00:55:38.420 well it

00:55:39.620 may not

00:55:40.020 be Alec

00:55:40.800 Baldwin's

00:55:41.280 fault

00:55:41.560 because it

00:55:42.220 was this

00:55:42.620 armorer

00:55:43.680 who handed

00:55:44.140 him the

00:55:44.460 gun

00:55:44.660 so it's

00:55:45.080 maybe that

00:55:45.540 other

00:55:45.740 person's

00:55:46.120 fault

00:55:46.340 what does

00:55:47.600 every

00:55:47.980 good

00:55:49.480 gun

00:55:49.980 owner

00:55:50.260 say

00:55:50.600 I'm

00:55:52.000 sorry

00:55:52.260 that's

00:55:52.720 an

00:55:52.960 absolute

00:55:53.420 it's

00:55:54.440 an

00:55:54.560 absolute

00:55:55.020 if it

00:55:55.800 was in

00:55:56.060 his

00:55:56.220 hand

00:55:56.600 it's

00:55:57.560 his

00:55:57.700 responsibility

00:55:58.400 yes we

00:55:59.840 hear your

00:56:00.180 argument

00:56:00.460 and we're

00:56:01.080 not listening

00:56:01.600 to it

00:56:01.920 it's an

00:56:02.260 absolute

00:56:02.660 we're not

00:56:03.920 going to be

00:56:04.320 rational about

00:56:05.000 this

00:56:05.300 did you hear

00:56:05.860 the part

00:56:06.200 where it's

00:56:06.480 an absolute

00:56:06.960 has to be

00:56:07.980 an absolute

00:56:08.400 because the

00:56:09.380 moment you

00:56:09.760 say there's

00:56:10.220 an exception

00:56:10.820 to gun

00:56:12.160 safety

00:56:12.600 somebody gets

00:56:13.840 killed

00:56:14.180 just like

00:56:15.380 the Alec

00:56:15.760 Baldwin

00:56:16.040 situation

00:56:16.680 that's why

00:56:17.800 there's no

00:56:18.320 exceptions

00:56:18.840 because the

00:56:19.800 moment you

00:56:20.360 make that

00:56:20.700 exception

00:56:21.060 somebody dies

00:56:21.820 airline

00:56:23.980 safety

00:56:24.520 should you

00:56:26.220 make

00:56:26.420 exceptions

00:56:26.900 yeah we're

00:56:28.240 really big

00:56:28.740 on airline

00:56:29.200 safety

00:56:29.700 but you

00:56:30.880 know

00:56:31.100 we'll make

00:56:31.720 an exception

00:56:32.240 you okay

00:56:33.960 with that

00:56:34.380 no I

00:56:35.560 think

00:56:35.760 airline

00:56:36.100 safety

00:56:36.620 and

00:56:37.540 and firearm

00:56:38.540 safety

00:56:39.060 should be

00:56:40.300 absolutes

00:56:41.060 and every

00:56:42.120 time you

00:56:42.480 think that

00:56:42.880 there should

00:56:43.200 be an

00:56:43.420 exception

00:56:43.740 to it

00:56:44.160 you're

00:56:44.360 wrong

00:56:44.580 and the

00:56:46.480 and the

00:56:46.740 pilot

00:56:46.980 situation

00:56:47.480 goes into

00:56:47.980 that

00:56:48.160 now I

00:56:48.740 think

00:56:49.080 I hate

00:56:50.260 the fact

00:56:50.620 that he

00:56:50.860 got fired

00:56:51.380 like from

00:56:52.240 a on a

00:56:52.780 human level

00:56:53.540 that just

00:56:55.040 sucks

00:56:55.420 right

00:56:56.040 he was just

00:56:57.080 being

00:56:57.600 interesting

00:56:58.740 and fun

00:56:59.420 it was a

00:57:00.480 bad decision

00:57:01.220 it had

00:57:02.400 nothing to

00:57:02.860 do with

00:57:03.160 his flying

00:57:03.840 ability

00:57:04.360 I hope

00:57:06.100 he gets

00:57:06.340 another job

00:57:06.860 and he's

00:57:07.120 fine

00:57:07.360 but I

00:57:09.200 kind of

00:57:09.560 back

00:57:09.880 I back

00:57:10.480 southwest

00:57:10.880 on this

00:57:11.420 I think

00:57:12.200 treating

00:57:12.540 safety as

00:57:13.200 an absolute

00:57:13.720 is good

00:57:14.820 for the

00:57:15.120 brand

00:57:15.500 good for

00:57:16.000 the passengers

00:57:16.580 and good

00:57:17.700 for the

00:57:17.960 world

00:57:18.220 it just

00:57:19.160 happened to

00:57:19.460 be really

00:57:19.780 bad for

00:57:20.200 one pilot

00:57:20.880 and I

00:57:21.620 don't think

00:57:22.120 it's fair

00:57:22.460 to him

00:57:22.780 but the

00:57:23.840 world

00:57:24.000 isn't fair

00:57:24.500 it's not

00:57:25.480 a fair

00:57:25.740 world

00:57:26.120 right

00:57:26.660 and

00:57:27.020 unfortunately

00:57:27.660 this went

00:57:28.380 his

00:57:28.660 the wrong

00:57:29.400 way

00:57:29.680 somebody

00:57:32.600 somebody says

00:57:32.840 I disagree

00:57:33.360 with your

00:57:33.760 framing

00:57:34.120 as a

00:57:34.580 safety

00:57:34.860 issue

00:57:35.220 that

00:57:35.700 doesn't

00:57:35.980 matter

00:57:36.220 really

00:57:36.540 it

00:57:37.220 doesn't

00:57:37.440 matter

00:57:37.760 because

00:57:38.560 it

00:57:38.680 doesn't

00:57:38.940 matter

00:57:39.120 if

00:57:39.300 you

00:57:39.500 think

00:57:39.740 it's

00:57:39.940 not

00:57:40.120 a

00:57:40.260 safety

00:57:40.520 issue

00:57:40.900 the

00:57:41.920 fact

00:57:42.180 that

00:57:42.480 I'm

00:57:42.900 a

00:57:43.020 reasonable

00:57:43.360 person

00:57:43.900 who

00:57:44.120 thinks

00:57:44.400 it

00:57:44.600 is

00:57:45.300 a

00:57:45.460 safety

00:57:45.700 issue

00:57:46.000 that

00:57:47.260 means

00:57:47.520 that

00:57:47.720 southwest

00:57:48.100 is

00:57:48.700 completely

00:57:49.280 reasonable

00:57:49.820 in

00:57:50.040 saying

00:57:50.240 you know

00:57:50.460 people

00:57:50.740 are

00:57:50.920 going

00:57:51.040 to

00:57:51.160 think

00:57:51.400 it's

00:57:51.560 a

00:57:51.700 safety

00:57:51.940 issue

00:57:52.280 even

00:57:53.500 if

00:57:53.780 we

00:57:53.960 don't

00:57:55.080 because

00:57:55.520 remember

00:57:55.900 safety

00:57:56.840 is an

00:57:57.160 absolute

00:57:57.600 so

00:57:58.600 you

00:57:58.720 have

00:57:58.900 to

00:57:59.040 treat

00:57:59.360 it

00:57:59.640 like

00:58:00.960 it's

00:58:01.340 an

00:58:01.480 absolute

00:58:01.800 and

00:58:03.260 so

00:58:03.420 they

00:58:03.560 can't

00:58:03.800 say

00:58:03.940 well

00:58:04.340 you know

00:58:04.680 this

00:58:04.880 case

00:58:05.260 all right

00:58:08.480 this is

00:58:09.420 oh

00:58:09.780 was he

00:58:10.280 not

00:58:10.480 fired

00:58:10.800 what

00:58:11.240 happened

00:58:11.500 to him

00:58:11.820 I'm

00:58:13.220 getting

00:58:13.420 a

00:58:13.700 correction

00:58:14.160 here

00:58:14.520 on

00:58:14.700 YouTube

00:58:15.000 was

00:58:15.760 he

00:58:15.880 not

00:58:16.100 fired

00:58:16.460 yeah

00:58:20.820 and it

00:58:21.140 doesn't

00:58:21.440 matter

00:58:21.660 if

00:58:21.900 it

00:58:22.020 didn't

00:58:22.200 start

00:58:22.500 any

00:58:22.700 fights

00:58:23.160 what

00:58:23.840 matters

00:58:24.200 is

00:58:24.540 any

00:58:24.800 reasonable

00:58:25.240 person

00:58:25.620 would

00:58:25.780 have

00:58:25.880 said

00:58:26.040 this

00:58:26.260 could

00:58:26.440 cause

00:58:26.720 trouble

00:58:27.040 a

00:58:28.500 reasonable

00:58:28.900 person

00:58:29.380 could

00:58:29.720 say

00:58:29.920 this

00:58:30.180 might

00:58:30.440 cause

00:58:30.740 trouble

00:58:31.040 and

00:58:31.200 that's

00:58:31.680 it

00:58:31.860 that's

00:58:32.120 the whole

00:58:32.340 story

00:58:32.660 if a

00:58:33.380 reasonable

00:58:33.700 person

00:58:34.140 could

00:58:34.320 say

00:58:34.500 you know

00:58:34.820 this

00:58:35.020 could

00:58:35.320 cause

00:58:35.560 a

00:58:35.680 problem

00:58:35.980 they

00:58:37.660 got

00:58:37.820 to

00:58:37.900 act

00:58:38.100 on

00:58:38.260 it

00:58:39.020 what

00:58:44.380 if

00:58:44.520 he

00:58:44.600 made

00:58:44.820 fun

00:58:45.100 of

00:58:45.240 the

00:58:45.360 flat

00:58:45.620 earth

00:58:45.860 well

00:58:46.140 I

00:58:46.420 don't

00:58:46.520 know

00:58:46.700 I'm

00:58:47.100 not

00:58:47.240 sure

00:58:47.400 that

00:58:47.640 that

00:58:48.880 hypothetical

00:58:49.400 helps

00:58:50.100 us

00:58:50.360 the

00:58:51.720 flight

00:58:51.920 was

00:58:52.080 on

00:58:52.220 the

00:58:52.320 ground

00:58:52.700 well

00:58:53.000 that

00:58:53.120 doesn't

00:58:53.340 matter

00:58:53.540 does

00:58:53.740 it

00:58:54.320 the

00:58:55.200 flight

00:58:55.360 was

00:58:55.540 on

00:58:55.660 the

00:58:55.740 ground

00:58:56.000 but

00:58:56.180 it

00:58:56.280 was

00:58:56.380 going

00:58:56.540 to

00:58:56.620 take

00:58:56.840 off

00:58:57.100 right

00:58:57.340 or

00:58:58.980 had

00:58:59.180 it

00:58:59.300 already

00:58:59.540 landed

00:58:59.940 in

00:59:00.740 any

00:59:00.960 case

00:59:01.220 they're

00:59:01.680 still

00:59:02.020 confined

00:59:02.980 in

00:59:03.200 that

00:59:03.360 space

00:59:03.680 so

00:59:03.820 it's

00:59:03.940 still

00:59:04.100 dangerous

00:59:04.540 shut up

00:59:10.560 and fly

00:59:10.880 the

00:59:11.040 plane

00:59:11.300 all right

00:59:12.700 that's

00:59:13.420 all

00:59:13.660 and I

00:59:14.500 will

00:59:14.740 talk

00:59:14.980 to

00:59:15.120 you

00:59:15.380 tomorrow

00:59:16.120 have

00:59:16.320 a

00:59:16.420 great

00:59:16.600 Halloween

00:59:17.400 everybody

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 31, 2021

Episode 1547 Scott Adams： I'll Tell You About the Frightening News Today. Join Me If You Dare

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript