Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1559 Scott Adams： Today's Show Will Mostly be About the Public Brainwashing We Are All Experiencing

00:00:00.880 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and everything in between, which we value equally.

00:00:07.580 This is the best thing that could have ever happened to you.

00:00:11.660 Yeah, it's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and how lucky that you either stumbled in here by luck, congratulations to you,

00:00:19.760 or you're so smart that you know you should come here every day.

00:00:23.920 Either way, it's a great, great way to start the day.

00:00:27.500 And if you'd like to take it up another notch, yeah, it's possible.

00:00:31.760 I know, I know, it doesn't seem like it could get any better, right?

00:00:35.200 But watch this. It's called the simultaneous sip, and no matter how good your day has started, it takes it up another level.

00:00:43.180 I know you won't believe it until you try it yourself, but let's try it.

00:00:46.660 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:52.560 I like coffee.

00:00:53.380 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:58.720 The dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, including your antibodies.

00:01:04.820 Don't believe me? Watch this. Go.

00:01:10.520 Mmm.

00:01:11.880 Can you feel your antibodies bristling?

00:01:15.820 They're bristling with power now.

00:01:17.680 The only way you can tell is you feel a little bit extra friction.

00:01:23.780 It's from the bristles.

00:01:26.020 That's science.

00:01:28.560 Well, as Marty Blartfest pointed out in a tweet today,

00:01:34.440 that Elon Musk was very clever to do a Twitter poll asking people if he should sell a bunch of his Tesla stock.

00:01:42.500 Why was that clever? Anybody? Anybody?

00:01:45.120 I'll tell you why it was clever.

00:01:50.480 It was clever because he warned the public ahead of time and framed it.

00:01:55.040 He framed it as a citizen trying to pay taxes.

00:02:00.820 How much better could you do?

00:02:02.760 You couldn't do any better than that.

00:02:04.440 Because if he had simply just sold it, and I think he had to, maybe to pay off some obligations from some other tax thing.

00:02:13.660 And imagine if he just sold it and didn't tell anybody that the stock would die, if it would look like he's lost faith.

00:02:23.180 And of course, that would be ridiculous because it's only $5 billion, which is not much for him.

00:02:28.060 But it would have looked bad.

00:02:31.520 But because he did this little Twitter poll, he made us think that the issue was paying taxes.

00:02:38.360 And we all kind of went along with that.

00:02:40.880 It was kind of genius.

00:02:42.180 And he's very, if you watch Musk, he's very consistent in understanding the room.

00:02:52.200 You know, able to work the room and work your impressions of the room.

00:02:57.060 You know, Tesla famously doesn't do advertising.

00:03:01.620 They don't do advertising.

00:03:04.200 Do me a fact check on that.

00:03:05.500 I think that's true, right?

00:03:06.440 They don't do advertising.

00:03:07.320 Instead, they just make good products that people want to talk about.

00:03:12.740 And then Elon Musk does things that people want to talk about.

00:03:16.820 Every time Elon Musk does something you think is a little crazy and provocative and maybe he shouldn't have done it,

00:03:23.340 if you're not simultaneously thinking to yourself, oh, they don't do regular marketing.

00:03:29.300 They draw your attention in non-traditional ways.

00:03:32.600 Once you realize that, it's a little more transparent what he's up to.

00:03:37.320 Have I told you that I was expecting a hit piece on me?

00:03:44.720 Because it's the political season starting to heat up again as we get to 2022.

00:03:50.520 So how many thought my prediction would be good, that there would be a hit piece on me?

00:03:54.980 Well, yesterday on Twitter, a journalist for SFGate, so this would be a local left-leaning publication,

00:04:08.080 asked if I would like to be the subject of a profile.

00:04:13.860 A profile.

00:04:14.380 Do you know what it means when a journalist asks somebody who talks about politics

00:04:21.360 if they could do a profile on him?

00:04:26.480 Well, I'm sad to say that I used to be dumb enough to fall for this, and did.

00:04:32.920 When I say used to, I'm not talking about when I was in my 20s and I didn't have much experience.

00:04:38.980 I'm talking about I fell for this trick five years ago, four years ago.

00:04:44.480 I fell for this with Bloomberg.

00:04:47.160 So Bloomberg had a journalist who said, hey, we want to do a big feature piece profile on you.

00:04:52.160 And I thought to myself, wow, Bloomberg's a pretty big publication,

00:04:57.520 and they want to do a feature piece on me.

00:05:00.040 This will be great.

00:05:01.300 I can mention my website and sell some books.

00:05:05.680 This couldn't be better.

00:05:07.740 That wasn't two years ago.

00:05:09.120 Now, that was like 2017, maybe?

00:05:14.360 Somebody do a fact check on that.

00:05:16.060 The Bloomberg article on me.

00:05:17.800 2017, I think.

00:05:20.520 No, was it before the election?

00:05:23.940 2016, maybe.

00:05:26.060 Anyway, the point is that Bloomberg clearly was playing on the Democrat team,

00:05:32.220 clearly sent somebody to take me out,

00:05:34.680 did not count on me retweeting it because I'm a little bit anti-fragile,

00:05:42.280 meaning that the more you attack me, the stronger I get.

00:05:45.820 And I don't think they quite counted on that.

00:05:49.420 And so, indeed, my profile went up instead of down.

00:05:52.700 But they took a run at it.

00:05:54.420 They took a pretty good run at it.

00:05:55.740 And if you were to Google my name,

00:05:57.900 the fake news industry would put their article at the top.

00:06:02.860 So, if you do a search for me,

00:06:05.980 now, I don't know if it's still the case,

00:06:07.840 but if you did it on Google and you did it,

00:06:12.200 oh, March 2017 is when the Bloomberg article was.

00:06:15.480 But if you did a search on that today,

00:06:17.240 I don't know if it would still be there,

00:06:18.800 but during the election, it was the top result.

00:06:22.120 So, if anybody saw something I said and said,

00:06:24.300 ah, I better check out this guy,

00:06:26.160 see if I should listen to more of what he says or not,

00:06:28.700 they would have seen that top result.

00:06:30.840 It was just a hit piece.

00:06:31.760 I'm just a ridiculous hit piece.

00:06:34.520 So, when the SFGate asked if they could do a profile piece on me,

00:06:40.640 I, of course, said, thank you, but no thank you.

00:06:45.200 So, they're coming.

00:06:48.020 They're coming.

00:06:49.200 Now, this won't be the last one.

00:06:51.180 And I would expect that at least somebody will write a piece

00:06:53.900 without my involvement.

00:06:55.720 It's far more credible if you can get the topic of your hit piece

00:07:00.000 to be part of it, which is what I used to fall for.

00:07:04.260 Oh, I think this will be good.

00:07:06.280 I'll just say good things,

00:07:08.220 and then that's all they can write about.

00:07:10.220 Nope.

00:07:11.080 They can just make up anything they want.

00:07:13.440 And they do.

00:07:14.960 All right.

00:07:15.380 Here's more on my theme that Democrats uniquely don't understand human motivation.

00:07:23.100 Every time I give you one of these examples,

00:07:25.760 put it in the bin in your brain with the other examples

00:07:29.100 of Democrats not understanding human motivation.

00:07:32.900 It's the problem with all of their stuff.

00:07:36.220 All of their policies have the same hole.

00:07:38.340 The humans don't act the way they hope they do.

00:07:43.040 Conservatives typically get the human part right.

00:07:46.660 Consistently.

00:07:47.800 Consistently.

00:07:48.820 Now, it might look like the conservatives are being more cruel

00:07:52.840 because they can be more harsh in their worldview,

00:07:56.540 but it's because it works.

00:07:59.100 There's no other reason.

00:08:00.680 The only reason is because it works,

00:08:03.140 and the other things don't work.

00:08:04.740 I'm almost positive that if you could find out that,

00:08:09.380 let's say, socialism worked,

00:08:12.240 you know, I don't think you could prove that,

00:08:14.380 but let's say pure socialism,

00:08:15.820 not the little bit like the Europeans do,

00:08:18.700 but if you could prove that pure socialism actually worked,

00:08:22.760 I think you could convince conservatives, too.

00:08:25.480 It's just that it can't be proved because it doesn't,

00:08:28.340 and it violates everything you know about human behavior.

00:08:31.820 But here's a new example.

00:08:33.300 And Greg Gottfeld tweeted this about CNN's coverage.

00:08:38.300 So the subject was the Rittenhouse trial,

00:08:44.100 Kyle Rittenhouse on trial for self-defense that they call murder.

00:08:48.780 And the chyron on CNN,

00:08:50.380 and Don Lemon was on there with two other people,

00:08:52.440 the chyron said,

00:08:53.580 conservatives embrace, comma, celebrate white vigilantism.

00:08:58.260 Oh, what?

00:09:02.220 Is that the most, let's say, unaware interpretation of conservatives?

00:09:14.720 Let me just give you a thought experiment.

00:09:19.140 Just a thought experiment.

00:09:20.620 Imagine that Kyle Rittenhouse had been black

00:09:23.680 and then imagine that exactly everything else was exactly the same

00:09:30.200 and that the people he shot were three white people,

00:09:34.300 just like Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:09:35.580 How would conservatives see this?

00:09:41.960 Do you think the conservatives would say,

00:09:43.700 oh, wait a minute,

00:09:44.660 I didn't realize that the shooter was black

00:09:47.140 and now self-defense doesn't matter

00:09:49.820 and I don't like the Second Amendment anymore?

00:09:52.580 Are you kidding me?

00:09:53.960 Are you kidding me?

00:09:58.660 See if I'm wrong.

00:10:00.720 I believe 100%, 100%, not even 99%,

00:10:05.020 I believe 100% of conservatives would say,

00:10:07.780 under the same facts, right,

00:10:09.520 that the facts have to be identical.

00:10:11.600 I think 100% of conservatives would say,

00:10:14.720 yeah, that's still self-defense.

00:10:17.220 That's still self-defense.

00:10:20.560 I'm looking at your comments

00:10:21.820 and you're all agreeing with me, right?

00:10:23.140 So anybody who has even a little bit of understanding

00:10:26.420 of the conservative philosophy,

00:10:29.040 there is no question about this one.

00:10:32.080 And to imagine, as CNN does,

00:10:34.740 to imagine in their usual mind-reading way,

00:10:38.220 to imagine that conservatives are seeing this to be about race,

00:10:42.500 this is so not about race.

00:10:45.760 Let me ask you something.

00:10:47.360 If a conservative sees an issue,

00:10:49.540 it involves a gun

00:10:50.560 and it also involves race,

00:10:54.040 which one's bigger in their mind?

00:10:57.720 Yeah, there's a racial component.

00:10:59.920 Maybe it's not that important to the story,

00:11:01.600 but there's a racial component.

00:11:03.300 And then there's a gun

00:11:04.260 and they're both important to the story.

00:11:06.640 The conservatives care about the gun.

00:11:08.960 The gun.

00:11:10.460 Right?

00:11:11.460 The Constitution.

00:11:12.480 This is easy stuff.

00:11:15.320 But the left,

00:11:16.320 I don't know if they don't know it

00:11:17.480 or they pretend they don't know it.

00:11:19.140 It's always hard to tell.

00:11:21.380 All right.

00:11:22.280 So as Greg Gutfeld pointed out,

00:11:24.560 the CNN has for months,

00:11:28.260 if not years,

00:11:29.640 cheered on the violent protests,

00:11:33.000 the Antifa,

00:11:33.880 the BLM,

00:11:34.420 and in direct language,

00:11:36.160 Chris Cuomo said directly

00:11:38.100 that, you know,

00:11:40.000 who said riots have to be peaceful?

00:11:42.640 Essentially supporting the fact

00:11:44.200 that some forms of protest

00:11:46.400 are going to get a little violent.

00:11:49.660 And then when the most obvious thing happens,

00:11:52.780 which is you rail against the police forever

00:11:55.920 and you defund the police

00:11:57.140 and you say,

00:11:58.460 yeah, it's fine to have these peaceful protests

00:12:00.400 that are actually violent,

00:12:02.200 how did you not think

00:12:04.780 a vigilante would appear?

00:12:08.680 Before Kyle,

00:12:10.540 did I not tell you

00:12:11.720 that vigilantes would appear?

00:12:14.980 Now, I don't think he was a vigilante.

00:12:17.460 So first of all,

00:12:19.060 don't buy their frame

00:12:20.120 because he wasn't a vigilante

00:12:21.780 or anything like it.

00:12:23.440 But I did tell you

00:12:24.580 the vigilantes were guaranteed

00:12:26.160 and I don't think Kyle's one of them,

00:12:28.520 but he's getting thrown into that group.

00:12:30.460 So it should have been predictable

00:12:32.980 that somebody would,

00:12:35.300 you know,

00:12:35.680 you could call him a vigilante,

00:12:37.140 but I would call him

00:12:38.020 just a patriot

00:12:39.860 who maybe made a decision

00:12:42.080 that shouldn't have been made.

00:12:44.620 But certainly his intention

00:12:45.860 was in the right place.

00:12:47.140 It looks like it to me.

00:12:49.660 So, Democrats,

00:12:51.300 you got what you asked for,

00:12:53.800 a world without police,

00:12:55.420 but you got to take it all.

00:12:57.060 You don't get just the good parts.

00:12:58.380 You don't get the part

00:12:59.960 where there's fewer police shootings

00:13:02.620 without the part

00:13:03.360 where there's more crime.

00:13:05.140 At least if defunding the police

00:13:06.840 is your only technique.

00:13:08.600 All right.

00:13:09.860 I have a rule

00:13:10.940 that you should never be taken seriously

00:13:13.060 if you have a porn mustache.

00:13:16.280 Can we all agree on this?

00:13:18.660 If you've got like a goatee or a beard,

00:13:21.460 maybe.

00:13:22.640 You know,

00:13:22.960 I'll take you seriously

00:13:23.980 if you've got a full goatee or a beard.

00:13:26.400 But can we take people seriously

00:13:30.020 who just have a mustache,

00:13:32.480 like a big, big old mustache?

00:13:35.180 I would say no.

00:13:37.000 And is it my imagination

00:13:38.440 or is Kyle Rittenhouse

00:13:40.760 being prosecuted by

00:13:42.440 Gary Oldman in Batman?

00:13:46.220 Am I wrong?

00:13:48.960 Right?

00:13:49.520 The prosecutor?

00:13:50.700 That's just Gary Oldman

00:13:51.980 in the Batman movies, right?

00:13:53.560 I think I'm right.

00:13:57.680 But there's new mustache news.

00:14:00.680 I said the same thing about...

00:14:03.340 Oh, I can't remember his name.

00:14:04.640 Never mind.

00:14:05.880 But Biden is nominating

00:14:07.620 a new head for the FDA,

00:14:09.620 the presumably corrupt group

00:14:12.760 in government.

00:14:13.380 I say presumably corrupt

00:14:14.760 based on what we've observed

00:14:17.500 in the last year.

00:14:18.520 I can't prove it,

00:14:21.040 so I don't have data,

00:14:22.420 but the smart assumption

00:14:25.060 is that the FDA is corrupt

00:14:27.180 and that money is behind it.

00:14:30.600 And I say that because

00:14:31.720 of the experience

00:14:32.400 with the rapid testing,

00:14:34.440 you know,

00:14:34.580 the slow approval of that.

00:14:35.980 If you look into that,

00:14:36.900 you'll see there is

00:14:38.220 no explanation for it,

00:14:39.700 which means there's

00:14:41.340 one explanation for it.

00:14:43.140 Now, I'd love to be wrong,

00:14:45.060 and I'd love to find out

00:14:45.980 that all the members

00:14:46.680 of the FDA are great patriots

00:14:49.520 and doing the best they can.

00:14:50.980 And there's no monetary anything.

00:14:54.520 But I doubt it.

00:14:55.720 So anyway,

00:14:56.280 the guy who's being nominated,

00:14:57.460 Dr. Rob Caliph,

00:14:59.540 he's got a big old porn mustache.

00:15:02.180 He's being put in charge

00:15:03.480 of the, you know,

00:15:05.440 maybe the entity

00:15:06.640 besides the Supreme Court

00:15:08.420 that we should take

00:15:09.140 most seriously.

00:15:11.180 Right?

00:15:11.660 It's one of the most serious jobs

00:15:13.740 you could ever have,

00:15:14.480 head of the FDA.

00:15:15.500 And we put porn mustache guy there.

00:15:18.920 Now,

00:15:19.920 porn mustache guy,

00:15:21.480 we only know one thing about him.

00:15:23.120 Well, two.

00:15:23.920 We know his name.

00:15:26.080 The second thing we know about him

00:15:27.440 is the one thing we know

00:15:28.660 he decided on,

00:15:30.040 he got wrong.

00:15:31.680 I wonder if I should have

00:15:32.920 a big old mustache.

00:15:35.360 If the,

00:15:36.260 if you're wearing a big,

00:15:37.840 um,

00:15:39.600 error in judgment

00:15:40.560 right on your face,

00:15:41.600 how are we supposed

00:15:44.060 to take the rest of it

00:15:45.120 seriously?

00:15:46.520 Now,

00:15:47.020 I've said that,

00:15:47.740 uh,

00:15:48.020 Trump had the same problem

00:15:49.200 with his unusual haircut,

00:15:51.020 Boris Johnson too.

00:15:52.420 Although I've come to think

00:15:53.660 that,

00:15:54.000 uh,

00:15:54.660 a,

00:15:55.280 an unusual haircut

00:15:56.540 might actually be an advantage

00:15:57.980 because people can't look away.

00:16:00.020 But the mustache

00:16:00.840 is different.

00:16:02.340 The mustache is

00:16:03.520 too normal.

00:16:05.980 Right?

00:16:06.540 You know,

00:16:06.760 having,

00:16:07.200 having wild hair

00:16:08.240 is,

00:16:08.640 is,

00:16:09.120 uh,

00:16:09.300 far less normal.

00:16:11.160 So,

00:16:11.760 I don't think you put

00:16:13.040 the mustache guy

00:16:14.000 in charge of the FDA.

00:16:14.980 That's all I'm saying.

00:16:16.160 And by the way,

00:16:16.660 this is speaking

00:16:17.600 in terms of persuasion.

00:16:19.820 You know,

00:16:20.060 I'm sure he's very qualified.

00:16:21.920 But persuasion-wise,

00:16:23.220 it's a bad look.

00:16:24.180 Let's talk about

00:16:24.920 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:16:25.800 and what's happening.

00:16:27.220 Are you all aware

00:16:28.100 of what the fake news industry,

00:16:30.140 the FNI,

00:16:30.780 is doing right now?

00:16:32.220 So the fake news industry,

00:16:33.740 I include,

00:16:34.720 if I can reach over here,

00:16:36.280 hold on,

00:16:42.580 audio problem.

00:16:45.880 So the FNI,

00:16:47.380 or fake news industry,

00:16:48.800 that I,

00:16:49.240 I include the social media networks

00:16:51.520 in part of that.

00:16:55.060 This is the play

00:16:56.200 they're running

00:16:56.680 on the country right now,

00:16:59.160 which is,

00:17:00.280 there are several narratives

00:17:01.880 that can come out

00:17:02.860 of the Rittenhouse trial.

00:17:04.580 One of them

00:17:05.160 is white supremacy.

00:17:06.280 Even though

00:17:08.520 there's no white supremacy

00:17:10.420 anywhere in the story.

00:17:12.320 There's no white supremacy

00:17:14.220 anywhere in the story.

00:17:16.240 There's nobody who was one.

00:17:18.000 Nobody did anything racial.

00:17:19.900 It was something

00:17:20.400 that white people

00:17:21.040 did to each other.

00:17:22.900 No trace of white supremacy.

00:17:24.480 But the narrative

00:17:26.800 is that the country

00:17:28.200 is full of white supremacy.

00:17:30.040 So Kyle is being tied to this.

00:17:32.000 Biden even called him

00:17:33.080 a white supremacist,

00:17:34.140 which he should be sued for,

00:17:35.640 if not lose his job.

00:17:37.720 Biden, that is.

00:17:38.360 He should lose his job for that.

00:17:40.220 He should be kicked out

00:17:41.260 of the presidency

00:17:41.860 for attacking a citizen

00:17:43.940 and not even correcting it.

00:17:47.300 I suppose if he'd corrected it,

00:17:48.920 if Biden did,

00:17:49.980 I'd be willing to say,

00:17:51.360 that was just a terrible mistake.

00:17:53.880 Well, you don't want

00:17:54.660 to lose a president over it?

00:17:56.460 Not correcting it?

00:17:57.760 Not correcting

00:17:59.800 that Biden called

00:18:01.920 this young man

00:18:03.120 a white supremacist

00:18:04.160 with no evidence whatsoever

00:18:06.640 that that was the case.

00:18:08.360 You need to be fired for that

00:18:10.340 if you're the president.

00:18:12.320 That should be the end of it.

00:18:13.580 They should just walk you

00:18:14.700 out of the office.

00:18:16.060 They should put your shit in a box

00:18:17.680 and get out of the office

00:18:19.300 because you are embarrassing

00:18:20.960 the country.

00:18:21.640 At that point,

00:18:22.460 you're so far from the,

00:18:25.520 let's say,

00:18:26.300 the culture of the United States

00:18:28.920 and what is right

00:18:29.920 and what every single person

00:18:31.400 thinks is right.

00:18:32.620 You need to go.

00:18:34.360 All right?

00:18:34.900 And being mentally incompetent,

00:18:36.400 that's not good enough.

00:18:37.900 You need to be out of that job

00:18:39.560 right away.

00:18:41.460 Here's something

00:18:42.080 that Trump never did.

00:18:44.360 Attack voters.

00:18:46.880 He never did that.

00:18:48.560 He attacked people

00:18:49.380 who attacked him.

00:18:50.160 That's different.

00:18:51.360 But he didn't go after

00:18:52.220 like an individual

00:18:53.460 in the news

00:18:54.180 and call him

00:18:54.700 something like

00:18:55.960 a white supremacist.

00:18:57.300 I mean,

00:18:57.480 that's so far over the line.

00:18:59.480 That should be

00:19:00.300 immediate.

00:19:01.860 Lose your job.

00:19:03.000 Anyway,

00:19:03.300 the other narrative

00:19:04.080 is that white men

00:19:05.340 are bad,

00:19:06.000 of course,

00:19:06.640 so there'll be more of that.

00:19:07.740 He's a white man.

00:19:08.840 Look at all these white men

00:19:09.900 doing bad things.

00:19:11.720 The other narrative

00:19:12.520 is about guns,

00:19:14.060 gun control.

00:19:14.920 You know,

00:19:15.060 hey,

00:19:15.440 if you have guns,

00:19:16.380 people are going to get killed.

00:19:17.960 Blah, blah.

00:19:18.360 And then there's

00:19:18.960 the unequal justice one,

00:19:20.680 which will pretend

00:19:21.900 that this case

00:19:22.900 is like other cases

00:19:24.220 where there's

00:19:24.720 a black defendant.

00:19:26.660 Is this case

00:19:27.760 anything

00:19:28.380 like any of those

00:19:30.020 other cases?

00:19:31.740 It's so,

00:19:33.540 yeah,

00:19:33.880 we're seeing it

00:19:34.960 in the comments

00:19:35.520 on locals.

00:19:36.820 These cases

00:19:37.740 are all unique.

00:19:39.380 There are no

00:19:39.820 two of these cases

00:19:41.220 that should be compared.

00:19:42.500 And the moment

00:19:43.780 you make an analogy

00:19:45.340 of these cases,

00:19:47.300 you've abandoned

00:19:47.900 all rational

00:19:49.780 discourse

00:19:50.400 because they're

00:19:52.960 just different things.

00:19:54.340 There's nothing

00:19:54.900 in common with them.

00:19:56.620 So,

00:19:57.140 here's the play.

00:19:59.040 The CNNs

00:20:00.180 and the fake news

00:20:01.000 industry of the world

00:20:01.840 will push these narratives

00:20:03.640 which will cause

00:20:04.660 riots and conflict

00:20:05.880 and lots of things

00:20:07.060 to talk about.

00:20:08.060 That will get them

00:20:08.860 lots of clicks

00:20:09.480 and they will make

00:20:10.060 more money

00:20:10.660 and it will increase

00:20:12.340 their political power.

00:20:14.140 Now,

00:20:15.340 you can see this,

00:20:17.000 right?

00:20:17.220 You all see

00:20:19.360 this forming

00:20:20.120 because now that

00:20:21.620 we've seen the cycle

00:20:22.800 enough times

00:20:23.420 you can see it early.

00:20:25.320 I feel like

00:20:26.300 there was a time

00:20:27.080 we wouldn't have

00:20:28.540 noticed this,

00:20:29.700 right?

00:20:30.360 There was a time

00:20:31.300 you wouldn't have

00:20:32.040 really known

00:20:32.560 this was going on

00:20:33.660 but now it's

00:20:34.520 all transparent.

00:20:35.820 I don't think

00:20:36.500 they try to hide it

00:20:37.360 anymore

00:20:37.720 because it's clear

00:20:38.920 that they don't need to.

00:20:40.600 They can just do it

00:20:41.280 right in front of you.

00:20:42.480 There's no penalty.

00:20:46.360 All right,

00:20:46.900 so let me talk

00:20:47.460 some more

00:20:47.820 about Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:20:49.480 How many of you

00:20:50.260 who watched it

00:20:51.120 think he was

00:20:51.900 fake crying?

00:20:54.060 This will be

00:20:54.600 an interesting question.

00:20:56.180 I'm very interested

00:20:56.960 in your answer to this.

00:20:58.500 How many of you

00:20:59.060 think he was

00:20:59.760 fake crying?

00:21:02.680 I'm seeing all

00:21:03.760 no's on Locals

00:21:05.520 and on YouTube

00:21:06.600 I'm seeing

00:21:08.340 nobody thinks

00:21:09.340 it was fake.

00:21:10.520 50-50?

00:21:12.040 Somebody says

00:21:12.620 PTSD?

00:21:13.120 Well, I saw

00:21:15.040 LeBron James

00:21:16.060 mock Kyle Rittenhouse

00:21:18.420 because he thought

00:21:19.860 it was fake crying

00:21:20.780 obviously

00:21:21.140 and he said

00:21:21.500 there's no tears.

00:21:23.480 Now, if I told you

00:21:24.440 there were no tears

00:21:25.480 I don't know

00:21:25.960 if you noticed

00:21:26.500 but I looked at it

00:21:27.600 again

00:21:27.760 and I didn't see any.

00:21:29.360 If there were

00:21:29.880 no tears

00:21:30.720 was it real?

00:21:32.340 Well, I mean

00:21:36.920 we can't read

00:21:37.460 his mind

00:21:37.960 but let me give you

00:21:39.120 LeBron knows

00:21:42.800 how to cry.

00:21:44.740 Let me give you

00:21:45.960 my take on this.

00:21:47.740 I put myself

00:21:48.540 in his position.

00:21:50.180 Suppose you were

00:21:51.200 Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:21:52.760 How would you feel

00:21:54.020 about the fact

00:21:55.140 that you took

00:21:56.320 two lives

00:21:57.100 and you were

00:21:58.060 being blamed

00:21:58.800 as a murderer

00:21:59.700 and a white supremacist

00:22:00.960 in public?

00:22:02.340 How would you feel

00:22:02.980 about that?

00:22:04.540 You'd feel

00:22:05.180 really shook

00:22:06.140 and I think

00:22:07.080 the word that

00:22:07.700 captures it best

00:22:09.540 is shook.

00:22:11.300 PTSD maybe

00:22:12.320 but just

00:22:13.740 shook to your core.

00:22:16.120 Now, let me ask

00:22:16.700 you the second question.

00:22:18.460 Do you think

00:22:18.900 he's sad

00:22:19.660 that he shot

00:22:20.900 those motherfuckers?

00:22:23.180 Nope.

00:22:24.460 Nope.

00:22:24.960 Why would he be?

00:22:25.820 Would you be?

00:22:26.880 Would you be sad

00:22:27.920 that you killed

00:22:28.480 those particular people

00:22:29.720 in those particular

00:22:30.800 circumstances?

00:22:31.400 I wouldn't be.

00:22:33.620 Do you think

00:22:34.380 that if I were

00:22:36.320 in this situation

00:22:37.160 that I would

00:22:38.620 act shook?

00:22:40.760 Yes.

00:22:42.120 Would I have

00:22:42.660 trouble even

00:22:43.380 forming words?

00:22:46.160 Maybe.

00:22:47.320 Probably.

00:22:49.120 Would I shed

00:22:50.340 a fucking tear?

00:22:53.060 Not one.

00:22:54.720 Not one.

00:22:56.240 There would not

00:22:57.200 be a tear.

00:22:57.740 because tears

00:22:58.940 are with sadness

00:23:00.100 and I don't

00:23:02.540 think he has

00:23:03.200 to be sad

00:23:03.700 about who he killed.

00:23:05.160 In fact,

00:23:05.760 they were people,

00:23:06.540 if I may

00:23:07.060 speak frankly,

00:23:09.680 that nobody's

00:23:10.740 going to miss.

00:23:12.500 I mean,

00:23:12.880 there's nothing

00:23:13.360 to be sad about.

00:23:15.140 So crying

00:23:15.680 would have looked

00:23:16.100 fake to me,

00:23:18.380 honestly.

00:23:18.960 If he had cried,

00:23:20.060 I'm not sure

00:23:20.600 I would have bought

00:23:21.140 that.

00:23:22.080 But being shook

00:23:23.140 to the core,

00:23:24.880 yeah,

00:23:25.160 that's human.

00:23:26.360 That's human.

00:23:28.020 All right.

00:23:29.660 Follow the money.

00:23:31.080 So that's what

00:23:31.560 this is about.

00:23:32.200 Have I told you

00:23:32.780 many times

00:23:33.440 that even when

00:23:34.760 people are not

00:23:35.460 consciously doing

00:23:36.500 something for the

00:23:37.260 money,

00:23:38.520 and even if they

00:23:39.780 could pass a lie

00:23:40.680 detector test,

00:23:41.920 you put somebody

00:23:42.520 in the lie detector

00:23:43.320 and say,

00:23:43.660 are you doing

00:23:44.060 this for the money?

00:23:45.400 And they say,

00:23:46.140 no, I'm doing

00:23:46.640 this because this

00:23:47.520 is the right thing

00:23:48.120 to do.

00:23:49.440 And they pass

00:23:50.300 the lie detector

00:23:51.000 test.

00:23:52.700 It's still

00:23:53.300 about the money.

00:23:53.860 Because people

00:23:55.820 will always

00:23:56.580 rationalize,

00:23:57.720 and even to

00:23:58.780 themselves,

00:23:59.760 they'll convince

00:24:00.380 themselves it's

00:24:01.200 not about the

00:24:01.760 money,

00:24:02.060 and they'll

00:24:02.380 really believe

00:24:02.860 it.

00:24:03.820 So if you

00:24:04.500 ask people,

00:24:05.740 no matter how

00:24:06.480 credible they

00:24:07.200 are,

00:24:07.600 no matter how

00:24:08.240 much you

00:24:08.540 believe them,

00:24:09.020 and they say,

00:24:09.560 no, it's not

00:24:10.180 about the money,

00:24:12.000 you can predict

00:24:13.600 where things will

00:24:15.080 go by following

00:24:16.460 the money,

00:24:17.260 even when it's

00:24:18.360 not about the

00:24:19.140 money.

00:24:19.400 So that's my

00:24:21.780 take.

00:24:22.860 Follow the money

00:24:23.640 always works when

00:24:24.640 people are doing

00:24:25.160 things for the

00:24:25.940 money, and they

00:24:26.820 tell you they are

00:24:27.480 if you could ask

00:24:28.540 them.

00:24:29.000 It always works

00:24:29.640 then.

00:24:30.480 But it also

00:24:31.340 works, and this

00:24:32.100 is the part I'm

00:24:32.660 adding to the

00:24:33.980 existing theory,

00:24:35.780 it also works

00:24:36.860 when nobody

00:24:37.780 involves,

00:24:38.700 believes,

00:24:40.080 honestly believes

00:24:40.820 that they're doing

00:24:41.300 anything for the

00:24:41.900 money.

00:24:42.580 It will still

00:24:43.660 go in the same

00:24:44.480 direction as the

00:24:45.620 money would

00:24:46.100 suggest.

00:24:46.900 So here's the

00:24:53.480 way the

00:24:54.240 Rittenhouse story

00:24:55.740 will go.

00:24:56.660 The way that

00:24:57.400 everybody can make

00:24:58.160 the most money

00:24:58.780 is he gets

00:25:01.000 acquitted, at

00:25:02.240 least of the

00:25:03.200 murderous charges,

00:25:04.700 gets acquitted,

00:25:05.380 there might be

00:25:05.780 some lesser

00:25:06.260 charge there.

00:25:08.580 And then

00:25:09.440 there are riots,

00:25:10.880 and then the

00:25:11.400 fake news industry

00:25:12.320 gets everybody

00:25:13.240 riled up, and

00:25:13.940 there's lots of

00:25:14.460 clicks, and

00:25:15.340 then everybody

00:25:15.820 gets money.

00:25:16.900 If you took

00:25:17.940 the CNN

00:25:18.540 analysts and

00:25:20.240 put them on a

00:25:20.900 lie detector,

00:25:21.520 let's imagine

00:25:22.080 that lie detectors

00:25:22.900 work.

00:25:23.800 In truth,

00:25:24.440 lie detectors

00:25:24.940 don't work.

00:25:25.780 You all knew

00:25:26.200 that, right?

00:25:27.380 Lie detectors

00:25:28.080 are fake

00:25:28.580 technology.

00:25:29.360 That's why

00:25:29.900 they're not

00:25:30.240 allowed in

00:25:30.980 courts, because

00:25:32.140 they don't

00:25:32.380 work.

00:25:33.280 But if people

00:25:33.880 think they

00:25:34.420 work, you

00:25:35.560 can learn

00:25:36.140 things, because

00:25:37.100 people will

00:25:37.580 act.

00:25:38.220 Anyway, there's

00:25:38.900 a longer story

00:25:39.440 about that.

00:25:40.120 But imagine

00:25:40.660 hypothetically that

00:25:42.860 there was such

00:25:43.380 a thing as a

00:25:44.220 lie detector that

00:25:44.980 actually worked,

00:25:45.660 reliably.

00:25:47.600 I'll bet you

00:25:48.160 could put all

00:25:48.660 the CNN

00:25:49.100 staff on it

00:25:49.940 and say,

00:25:50.460 are you doing

00:25:51.020 this for the

00:25:51.540 money?

00:25:53.120 This is really

00:25:53.820 about the

00:25:54.140 money, isn't

00:25:54.620 it?

00:25:55.420 I'll bet every

00:25:56.040 one of them

00:25:56.400 would pass the

00:25:57.060 lie detector.

00:25:58.240 No, it's not

00:25:58.740 about the

00:25:59.060 money.

00:25:59.640 I wouldn't do

00:26:00.080 that.

00:26:00.840 It's about

00:26:01.200 the news.

00:26:04.500 But the

00:26:05.020 predictor says

00:26:06.420 follow the

00:26:06.880 money.

00:26:07.720 So it's

00:26:08.320 definitely going

00:26:08.800 to go to

00:26:09.140 acquittal, because

00:26:09.780 that's where

00:26:10.100 they get the

00:26:10.520 most money,

00:26:11.080 because that

00:26:11.340 would be the

00:26:11.660 most outrage.

00:26:12.160 And so

00:26:14.860 here's more

00:26:15.480 on that.

00:26:16.180 So CNN was

00:26:17.300 trying to make

00:26:17.880 a story out

00:26:18.600 of the judge,

00:26:20.100 which now

00:26:20.660 they're going

00:26:20.920 to paint the

00:26:21.380 judge as a

00:26:21.880 white supremacist.

00:26:23.700 And there's no

00:26:24.560 evidence of that

00:26:25.240 either, right?

00:26:25.820 Of course.

00:26:26.680 But they're going

00:26:27.140 to make him look

00:26:27.660 like he's part

00:26:28.620 of the problem.

00:26:29.780 And I guess he

00:26:30.420 made a joke

00:26:30.960 about the Asian

00:26:32.280 food might be

00:26:33.320 delayed because

00:26:34.080 of the supply

00:26:34.680 chain problem.

00:26:36.200 And he was

00:26:37.720 obviously making

00:26:38.440 a joke.

00:26:38.880 And CNN is

00:26:41.720 saying that some

00:26:42.720 Asians were

00:26:43.360 offended by that

00:26:44.380 because it

00:26:45.780 makes it seem

00:26:46.360 as if the

00:26:46.960 supply chain

00:26:47.580 problem is the

00:26:48.380 fault of Asians.

00:26:52.560 What?

00:26:54.880 What?

00:26:57.880 I'm pretty sure

00:26:58.880 there's such a

00:26:59.520 thing as Chinese

00:27:00.880 food.

00:27:02.260 Now, he said

00:27:02.820 Asian food because

00:27:03.760 maybe it wasn't

00:27:04.360 all Chinese.

00:27:05.780 It could have

00:27:06.160 been Vietnamese

00:27:07.320 or whatever.

00:27:07.880 but if you

00:27:12.580 say a joke

00:27:13.520 about maybe

00:27:14.140 your food

00:27:14.640 didn't come

00:27:15.220 because of

00:27:15.700 the supply

00:27:16.180 chain problem,

00:27:17.980 that's saying

00:27:18.920 that the people

00:27:19.580 who make

00:27:20.680 the Asian

00:27:21.500 food are

00:27:23.000 victims of

00:27:24.160 the supply

00:27:24.700 chain.

00:27:26.760 He's saying

00:27:27.740 that the

00:27:28.900 Asians, like

00:27:29.900 all the rest

00:27:30.500 of us,

00:27:31.760 might be

00:27:32.520 victims of

00:27:34.140 the supply

00:27:34.620 chain problem.

00:27:35.960 There's literally

00:27:36.740 no fucking

00:27:37.580 thing here

00:27:38.200 about them

00:27:38.720 causing the

00:27:39.520 supply chain

00:27:40.160 problem.

00:27:42.120 Oh, my God.

00:27:44.020 There's literally

00:27:44.840 nothing here.

00:27:46.800 Now, there were

00:27:47.340 some activists in

00:27:48.460 the Asian

00:27:49.480 community who

00:27:50.260 made a thing

00:27:50.920 of it, but I

00:27:52.460 don't think that

00:27:53.000 needed to be

00:27:53.620 reported because

00:27:54.660 activists will

00:27:55.440 take any

00:27:56.380 reason to

00:27:57.500 connect to the

00:27:58.200 headlines to

00:27:58.920 make their

00:27:59.320 case.

00:27:59.620 So I don't

00:28:00.840 think you

00:28:01.120 can listen to

00:28:01.580 the activists

00:28:02.160 in a story

00:28:02.640 like this.

00:28:03.460 But really,

00:28:04.000 CNN, do a

00:28:04.900 little bit of

00:28:05.700 filtering.

00:28:08.120 A little bit

00:28:08.660 of filtering.

00:28:10.740 That blows

00:28:11.640 my mind.

00:28:14.120 And then

00:28:14.480 here's another,

00:28:16.360 this headline

00:28:17.100 is on Twitter.

00:28:18.040 You know,

00:28:18.220 Twitter puts

00:28:18.740 their own

00:28:19.360 little, they

00:28:20.740 call out

00:28:21.300 different stories

00:28:22.180 on the right

00:28:22.920 hand side of

00:28:24.180 the web

00:28:24.760 browser version.

00:28:26.220 And here's

00:28:26.900 what they said

00:28:27.440 today.

00:28:27.780 Overwhelmingly

00:28:28.960 white juries

00:28:29.640 will decide

00:28:30.340 both the

00:28:30.900 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:28:31.600 and Ahmoud

00:28:32.400 Arbery cases.

00:28:34.480 The system

00:28:35.200 is imperfect,

00:28:36.200 legal experts

00:28:36.840 say.

00:28:38.700 Now, do you

00:28:39.620 see what

00:28:39.900 they're doing

00:28:40.220 here?

00:28:41.280 They're making

00:28:42.120 you try to

00:28:42.840 think that the

00:28:43.620 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:28:44.300 case and the

00:28:44.960 Ahmoud Arbery

00:28:45.880 case are

00:28:47.440 equivalents.

00:28:49.060 Right?

00:28:49.540 They don't say

00:28:50.080 it, but that's

00:28:51.320 the clear

00:28:51.940 suggestion that

00:28:52.920 these two

00:28:53.380 cases have

00:28:53.960 something in

00:28:54.500 common.

00:28:55.520 And they

00:28:55.880 don't.

00:28:56.820 They really

00:28:57.320 don't.

00:28:58.740 Now, why

00:29:00.680 do you

00:29:01.480 imagine that

00:29:02.320 overwhelmingly

00:29:03.240 white juries

00:29:04.120 are the

00:29:05.040 ones that

00:29:05.380 got picked

00:29:05.780 in both

00:29:06.280 cases?

00:29:07.760 Why do you

00:29:09.920 think that

00:29:10.260 is?

00:29:11.460 I don't

00:29:11.920 know.

00:29:13.540 I don't

00:29:13.860 know.

00:29:14.740 But

00:29:14.920 certainly

00:29:17.500 both the

00:29:18.640 alternative,

00:29:19.420 don't all

00:29:20.000 the attorneys

00:29:20.800 have the

00:29:21.180 same amount

00:29:21.700 of challenges?

00:29:23.200 Am I

00:29:23.560 wrong?

00:29:24.700 Don't you

00:29:25.060 have exactly

00:29:25.600 the same

00:29:26.080 amount of

00:29:26.460 challenges if

00:29:27.220 you're the

00:29:27.460 prosecution or

00:29:28.340 the defense?

00:29:29.920 So the

00:29:30.640 jury is

00:29:31.220 whatever the

00:29:31.800 jury is.

00:29:32.500 I mean,

00:29:32.700 it's not

00:29:33.000 because they

00:29:33.960 picked it that

00:29:34.480 way.

00:29:35.580 I mean,

00:29:35.940 they might

00:29:36.200 try, but

00:29:36.940 there's a

00:29:37.440 limit to how

00:29:37.860 much they

00:29:38.200 can game

00:29:39.220 that system.

00:29:40.860 So, of

00:29:41.440 course, just

00:29:41.840 framing the

00:29:42.480 story in this

00:29:43.080 way.

00:29:43.560 And by the

00:29:43.900 way, I think

00:29:44.300 this is a

00:29:44.760 good question.

00:29:46.160 Don't you?

00:29:47.180 It's a perfectly

00:29:47.840 good question.

00:29:48.480 I think you

00:29:49.980 should be

00:29:50.880 asking questions

00:29:51.660 about the

00:29:52.260 racial

00:29:54.160 composition of

00:29:55.900 your juries.

00:29:56.980 So there's

00:29:57.380 nothing wrong

00:29:57.820 with the

00:29:58.040 question, and

00:29:59.080 I don't think

00:29:59.480 we should

00:29:59.820 ever take

00:30:00.240 our eye

00:30:00.620 off of

00:30:01.040 that.

00:30:01.600 It's

00:30:01.840 useful.

00:30:02.800 We should

00:30:03.020 keep an

00:30:03.560 eye on it.

00:30:04.220 But it

00:30:04.560 shouldn't be

00:30:04.900 the one

00:30:05.780 factor, right?

00:30:07.480 It shouldn't

00:30:07.780 be the one

00:30:08.200 factor.

00:30:09.160 And when

00:30:09.720 you frame

00:30:10.220 the story

00:30:10.640 like this,

00:30:11.220 you're just

00:30:11.560 playing to

00:30:13.120 the narrative

00:30:13.600 that this

00:30:14.160 is a racial

00:30:15.200 thing in

00:30:15.920 which it

00:30:16.420 wasn't.

00:30:16.960 All right.

00:30:23.800 Apparently,

00:30:24.580 some

00:30:25.060 progressives

00:30:26.160 are just

00:30:26.800 learning that

00:30:28.820 Kyle's victims

00:30:30.260 were not

00:30:30.820 black.

00:30:32.000 Because there's

00:30:32.520 some tweets

00:30:33.100 where people

00:30:33.700 are saying,

00:30:34.100 wait a minute,

00:30:34.480 wait a minute,

00:30:35.440 this whole time

00:30:36.260 you're telling

00:30:36.620 me that he

00:30:37.280 didn't shoot

00:30:37.740 black people?

00:30:39.200 That's actually

00:30:40.180 what a number

00:30:41.360 of people in

00:30:42.100 the left

00:30:43.600 community believe.

00:30:45.380 They've watched

00:30:45.900 this story all

00:30:46.880 these months

00:30:47.600 and months

00:30:48.180 and they

00:30:49.340 thought the

00:30:49.740 victims were

00:30:50.460 black.

00:30:52.140 Sorry,

00:30:53.000 I said

00:30:53.420 victims,

00:30:53.960 didn't I?

00:30:54.760 Good catch.

00:30:56.320 That's a good

00:30:56.780 catch.

00:30:57.960 The victim

00:30:58.580 was Kyle.

00:31:01.640 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:31:02.600 was the only

00:31:03.140 victim in the

00:31:03.740 story.

00:31:04.520 The others

00:31:05.000 were people

00:31:05.540 who had

00:31:06.180 bad things

00:31:06.680 happen to

00:31:07.100 him.

00:31:08.420 But the

00:31:09.180 victim of

00:31:09.820 the crime

00:31:10.220 was Kyle

00:31:10.740 Rittenhouse.

00:31:11.340 Thank you

00:31:11.880 for that

00:31:12.120 correction.

00:31:12.620 That is a

00:31:13.180 good correction.

00:31:14.740 So apparently

00:31:15.200 progressives are

00:31:15.960 just learning

00:31:16.720 that their

00:31:17.440 bubble is

00:31:18.580 not getting

00:31:18.980 real news.

00:31:20.540 I saw some

00:31:21.140 compilations of

00:31:22.120 tweets of that

00:31:23.240 nature.

00:31:24.740 And so I

00:31:25.560 tweeted that

00:31:26.460 and I said

00:31:27.180 to progressives,

00:31:29.020 after you find

00:31:30.020 out that you've

00:31:31.100 been lied to

00:31:32.200 about Kyle

00:31:33.400 Rittenhouse,

00:31:34.680 go Google

00:31:35.640 this phrase,

00:31:37.160 fine people

00:31:37.780 hoax,

00:31:39.180 the fine

00:31:39.740 people hoax,

00:31:40.740 do it first

00:31:41.560 on Duck

00:31:42.040 Duck

00:31:42.300 Go and

00:31:43.620 then do

00:31:43.960 the same

00:31:44.400 search on

00:31:44.900 Google and

00:31:46.340 compare them.

00:31:47.840 And then I

00:31:48.380 advised them

00:31:49.600 to wear a

00:31:50.120 hat because

00:31:51.460 their head is

00:31:52.340 going to come

00:31:52.820 right off.

00:31:55.560 Now, I was

00:31:56.700 asked, why is

00:31:58.060 it that I keep

00:31:59.280 going back to

00:32:00.040 this fine

00:32:00.520 people hoax?

00:32:01.180 Like, why am I

00:32:01.740 so obsessed with

00:32:03.460 this above all

00:32:04.320 other things?

00:32:05.300 And the answer

00:32:06.040 is, it's the

00:32:06.820 tentpole hoax.

00:32:08.880 Do you know

00:32:09.220 what a tentpole

00:32:10.100 refers to?

00:32:11.280 So the tentpole

00:32:12.160 is the biggest

00:32:13.120 pole that's

00:32:14.340 the most

00:32:14.680 important one

00:32:15.300 holding up a

00:32:15.920 tent, let's

00:32:16.580 say a circus

00:32:17.120 tent situation.

00:32:18.700 If you can

00:32:19.420 take the tentpole

00:32:20.260 out, it doesn't

00:32:21.600 matter how many

00:32:22.260 other smaller

00:32:22.860 poles there are,

00:32:23.760 the tent's

00:32:24.160 going to

00:32:24.400 collapse.

00:32:26.000 So on the

00:32:27.460 fine people

00:32:28.120 hoax, I've

00:32:29.000 been using the

00:32:29.780 Andre Agassi

00:32:30.820 strategy.

00:32:32.860 Now, Andre

00:32:33.440 Agassi had a

00:32:34.200 strategy playing

00:32:35.060 players who

00:32:36.780 usually were

00:32:37.560 lesser players,

00:32:38.580 but sometimes

00:32:39.180 not so much.

00:32:40.860 And usually

00:32:41.300 everybody you

00:32:41.980 play has at

00:32:42.620 least one

00:32:43.020 strength, but

00:32:44.720 they might have

00:32:45.300 also at least

00:32:46.140 one weakness.

00:32:47.080 Let's say the

00:32:47.620 backhand is a

00:32:48.320 weakness and the

00:32:49.300 forehand is a

00:32:50.000 strength.

00:32:51.160 Almost every

00:32:52.120 tennis player

00:32:53.040 would try to

00:32:54.080 hit more balls

00:32:54.880 to their

00:32:55.260 opponent's

00:32:55.760 weakness,

00:32:56.880 because obviously

00:32:57.560 that's where

00:32:57.980 you're going to

00:32:58.300 get your

00:32:58.580 points.

00:32:59.540 You hit to

00:32:59.960 their weakness,

00:33:00.520 not to their

00:33:00.960 strength.

00:33:02.240 Andre

00:33:02.540 Agassi did

00:33:03.160 the opposite.

00:33:04.680 Probably not

00:33:05.400 every time, but

00:33:06.020 one of his big

00:33:07.120 strategies was he

00:33:08.540 would go after

00:33:09.160 their strength.

00:33:11.060 Do you know

00:33:11.640 why?

00:33:13.180 Because their

00:33:13.860 best shot is

00:33:15.800 their tent

00:33:16.280 pole.

00:33:17.720 If he goes to

00:33:19.180 their tent

00:33:19.600 pole shot, let's

00:33:20.420 say it's the

00:33:20.840 forehand, they've

00:33:21.500 got a blistering

00:33:22.220 forehand, and

00:33:23.240 they hit a

00:33:23.760 blistering

00:33:24.300 forehand, what

00:33:26.540 happens to the

00:33:27.380 confidence of both

00:33:28.360 of you?

00:33:30.000 Not much

00:33:30.780 change.

00:33:31.740 Not much

00:33:32.260 change.

00:33:32.820 Because you

00:33:33.340 expected the

00:33:34.460 person to have

00:33:34.980 that blazing

00:33:35.520 forehand, you

00:33:36.920 expected him to

00:33:37.740 make some

00:33:38.080 points off it,

00:33:38.680 and that's

00:33:38.920 what happened.

00:33:39.760 So your

00:33:40.140 expectations were

00:33:41.180 just about where

00:33:41.820 they belonged.

00:33:42.900 But what if

00:33:45.180 Andre

00:33:46.460 Agassi can win

00:33:48.060 two points?

00:33:53.440 Well, then you

00:33:55.040 think, oh,

00:33:56.020 crap, my best

00:33:57.980 weapon doesn't

00:33:58.640 work against

00:33:59.220 Andre

00:33:59.560 Agassi.

00:34:00.500 And it could

00:34:01.000 be he just

00:34:01.480 got lucky.

00:34:02.600 It could be he

00:34:03.260 just had two

00:34:04.140 points that the

00:34:05.500 bounce went his

00:34:06.160 way.

00:34:07.200 But in two

00:34:08.520 points, he can

00:34:09.980 destroy a player

00:34:11.400 completely.

00:34:13.780 Two points.

00:34:16.020 That's the

00:34:16.620 strategy.

00:34:17.800 Now, you have to

00:34:18.300 be as good as

00:34:18.860 him to be able to

00:34:19.580 pull that off, but

00:34:20.660 the risk-reward is

00:34:22.320 really good.

00:34:23.620 If you can take

00:34:24.300 out the tent

00:34:24.880 pole, you win,

00:34:27.020 and the rest is

00:34:27.680 just the details.

00:34:28.820 Because once their

00:34:29.360 confidence is gone,

00:34:30.340 you just dismantle

00:34:31.260 them.

00:34:32.080 So the find

00:34:33.140 people hoax is

00:34:33.920 the one that

00:34:34.280 makes all the

00:34:35.040 lesser hoaxes

00:34:35.960 believable.

00:34:37.840 You see that,

00:34:38.600 right?

00:34:39.140 If you were on

00:34:40.200 the left and

00:34:40.920 you believed the

00:34:41.740 find people hoax,

00:34:42.660 you believed it

00:34:43.200 actually happened,

00:34:44.260 it would be easy

00:34:45.440 to believe that

00:34:46.780 all of the

00:34:47.400 smaller suggestions

00:34:48.520 of racist-like

00:34:50.340 things could have

00:34:51.200 also been true.

00:34:51.900 But if the tent

00:34:53.700 pole is removed

00:34:54.600 and you find out

00:34:55.740 that the press

00:34:56.560 had lied to you

00:34:57.440 about something

00:34:58.520 really important

00:34:59.660 and really basic,

00:35:01.740 you're going to

00:35:02.820 question all the

00:35:03.720 rest.

00:35:04.100 So this is an

00:35:06.740 Andre Agassi

00:35:07.480 play.

00:35:08.180 I don't know

00:35:08.920 that I can take

00:35:09.540 the tent pole

00:35:10.180 out, but when

00:35:11.460 I saw people

00:35:12.220 start to

00:35:13.820 abandon ship

00:35:15.960 over the

00:35:17.000 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:35:17.840 thing, I saw

00:35:19.120 an opening.

00:35:20.620 And if I can

00:35:21.480 make the

00:35:21.880 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:35:22.660 story, connect

00:35:24.600 it to the

00:35:25.040 find people

00:35:25.580 hoax, and get

00:35:26.720 people to just

00:35:27.820 Google the two

00:35:28.620 sources, DuckDuckGo

00:35:29.840 and Google, and

00:35:31.220 see that they're

00:35:31.740 completely

00:35:32.400 different, one

00:35:34.740 says it's a

00:35:35.300 hoax and one

00:35:35.840 says it's real.

00:35:39.560 I'm pretty

00:35:40.200 close to the

00:35:40.820 tent pole.

00:35:42.540 Now, if you

00:35:42.920 also noticed, if

00:35:43.960 some of you have

00:35:44.560 been watching me

00:35:45.140 now for years,

00:35:46.340 actually, going

00:35:47.420 after every

00:35:48.060 suggestion about

00:35:48.960 the find people

00:35:49.660 hoax, you know,

00:35:50.400 I go after it

00:35:51.160 pretty hard on

00:35:51.660 Twitter.

00:35:52.600 And have you

00:35:52.940 noticed that the

00:35:53.960 replies have

00:35:56.400 changed a lot

00:35:57.820 since the

00:35:58.800 beginning?

00:35:59.740 Remember in

00:36:00.260 the beginning,

00:36:00.820 I'd say it's

00:36:01.360 a hoax, and I

00:36:02.120 would just get

00:36:02.600 slammed by

00:36:04.180 people saying,

00:36:04.920 God, it

00:36:05.240 wasn't a

00:36:05.680 hoax, we

00:36:06.140 saw it with

00:36:06.620 our own eyes,

00:36:07.420 heard it with

00:36:07.780 our own ears.

00:36:09.120 Now, I still

00:36:09.900 get that.

00:36:11.260 I still get

00:36:11.920 that, but one

00:36:13.760 or two, right?

00:36:15.580 And they get

00:36:16.320 slammed by the

00:36:17.360 other commenters

00:36:18.200 who just show

00:36:18.760 them the

00:36:19.000 transcript and

00:36:19.860 slap them down

00:36:20.760 pretty hard.

00:36:22.140 So, at this

00:36:23.520 point, that

00:36:25.240 find people

00:36:26.040 hoax tent pole

00:36:27.160 is in jeopardy.

00:36:28.580 I'm not going

00:36:29.300 to predict it

00:36:29.840 will come

00:36:30.100 down, but

00:36:31.340 this is the

00:36:31.840 closest it's

00:36:32.560 been to being

00:36:33.220 wobbly, and

00:36:34.400 it is what I'm

00:36:35.020 going for.

00:36:35.760 Because I don't

00:36:36.240 think I can

00:36:36.680 make any

00:36:37.120 progress chipping

00:36:38.560 away at the

00:36:39.280 lesser poles.

00:36:41.880 I'm going for

00:36:42.480 the tent pole.

00:36:43.660 If I take out

00:36:44.580 the tent pole,

00:36:45.260 it's all over.

00:36:47.100 So that's the

00:36:47.720 strategy.

00:36:49.420 All right,

00:36:49.900 Biden's got some

00:36:50.980 fake news about

00:36:51.760 him.

00:36:52.300 He was talking

00:36:52.740 about Satchel

00:36:53.440 Page, who had

00:36:55.060 been a member

00:36:56.120 of what was

00:36:57.600 called in

00:36:58.160 its day the

00:36:59.260 Negro League

00:37:00.320 for baseball.

00:37:01.480 Now, that's

00:37:01.980 what it was

00:37:02.400 called in

00:37:02.960 its day.

00:37:04.380 So, in

00:37:04.960 its day, it

00:37:05.560 wasn't considered

00:37:06.220 an insult

00:37:06.780 because the

00:37:08.160 folks who

00:37:08.940 were on

00:37:09.340 the team

00:37:09.780 used the

00:37:10.740 same language.

00:37:11.640 It didn't

00:37:11.840 mean anything

00:37:12.300 back then.

00:37:13.820 So, when

00:37:14.300 Biden was

00:37:14.860 making reference

00:37:15.680 to Satchel

00:37:16.660 Page, he

00:37:18.200 said he

00:37:21.860 was a great

00:37:22.560 Negro player

00:37:23.600 player, and

00:37:25.120 that he

00:37:25.600 clarified that

00:37:27.260 he was

00:37:27.460 talking about

00:37:27.900 the Negro

00:37:28.920 League, and

00:37:30.280 that he was

00:37:30.560 a player in

00:37:31.060 that league.

00:37:32.120 Now, of

00:37:32.800 course, the

00:37:33.380 right took

00:37:35.760 that out of

00:37:36.400 context

00:37:36.940 immediately and

00:37:38.080 says, hey,

00:37:39.680 he's calling

00:37:40.680 black people

00:37:41.340 Negroes, and

00:37:42.280 therefore he's

00:37:42.820 really a racist.

00:37:44.920 Now, do you

00:37:46.100 think there's

00:37:46.520 even one

00:37:47.280 person on

00:37:48.780 the right who

00:37:50.340 actually believes

00:37:51.300 that this is

00:37:51.860 some kind of

00:37:52.280 racist talk?

00:37:55.680 I don't think

00:37:56.440 so.

00:37:56.800 I don't think

00:37:57.400 there's even

00:37:57.740 one person

00:37:58.280 who thinks

00:37:58.680 this is

00:37:59.040 racist, but

00:38:00.180 I think the

00:38:02.360 right is

00:38:02.720 having fun

00:38:03.240 with it,

00:38:04.160 because it's

00:38:04.720 so similar

00:38:05.380 to what the

00:38:05.920 left does

00:38:06.400 to the

00:38:06.680 right.

00:38:07.520 So I

00:38:07.820 think people

00:38:08.260 are pretending

00:38:09.060 as if

00:38:09.700 they're,

00:38:10.380 you know,

00:38:10.920 gotcha,

00:38:11.940 because it's

00:38:12.880 the same

00:38:13.220 game that's

00:38:13.840 played in

00:38:14.220 the other

00:38:14.460 direction.

00:38:15.240 So I

00:38:15.460 think it's

00:38:16.520 fair, it's

00:38:17.520 sort of fair

00:38:18.000 game, you

00:38:18.720 could argue,

00:38:19.600 to take this

00:38:20.460 out of context

00:38:21.180 just to make

00:38:21.840 the point.

00:38:23.200 But correct

00:38:24.300 me if I'm

00:38:24.740 wrong, there's

00:38:25.420 no conservative

00:38:26.120 who thinks

00:38:26.660 this is racist,

00:38:27.460 right?

00:38:28.520 He just was

00:38:29.420 referring to

00:38:30.020 a historical

00:38:30.780 language.

00:38:34.480 Yeah.

00:38:35.340 Alinsky says

00:38:36.080 make them

00:38:36.460 live by their

00:38:36.980 own rules.

00:38:37.660 Yeah, it's a

00:38:37.980 good strategy.

00:38:39.120 It's a good

00:38:39.560 strategy to

00:38:40.300 attack it like

00:38:41.040 it was as

00:38:42.460 if it were

00:38:42.920 true, but

00:38:43.540 it's very

00:38:43.980 much not

00:38:44.400 true.

00:38:45.820 All right.

00:38:48.340 This is a

00:38:49.120 story from

00:38:49.560 the AP.

00:38:50.080 And here's

00:38:52.020 a story that

00:38:52.580 you'd have to

00:38:53.040 be deep in

00:38:53.660 the bubble of

00:38:54.800 news bubble to

00:38:57.220 read this

00:38:57.860 story and not

00:38:58.940 have the

00:39:00.060 reaction that

00:39:00.680 most of you

00:39:01.260 are going to

00:39:01.540 have.

00:39:02.280 All right,

00:39:02.560 listen to

00:39:02.920 this.

00:39:03.160 This is

00:39:03.380 actually a

00:39:03.800 quote from

00:39:04.260 an AP story

00:39:04.960 today.

00:39:05.680 This is

00:39:06.080 mind-boggling.

00:39:06.740 It says

00:39:07.980 one of the

00:39:08.440 nation's two

00:39:09.180 major political

00:39:10.020 parties appears

00:39:11.280 increasingly

00:39:12.000 tolerant of

00:39:13.280 at least some

00:39:14.160 persistent level

00:39:15.140 of violence in

00:39:16.060 American discourse

00:39:17.060 or at least

00:39:18.300 willing to turn

00:39:19.100 a blind eye to

00:39:19.900 it.

00:39:20.780 Which party are

00:39:21.660 they talking

00:39:22.040 about?

00:39:23.920 Is that a

00:39:24.880 reference to

00:39:26.000 Democrats or

00:39:26.940 Republicans?

00:39:28.700 Because it's

00:39:29.480 one party.

00:39:30.120 They say one

00:39:30.620 party.

00:39:31.840 Let me read it

00:39:32.580 again and you

00:39:33.940 tell me this is

00:39:34.700 Democrats or

00:39:35.520 Republicans.

00:39:35.940 one of the

00:39:37.000 nation's two

00:39:37.660 political parties

00:39:38.600 appear increasingly

00:39:40.280 tolerant or at

00:39:41.380 least to at

00:39:42.560 least some

00:39:42.960 persistent level

00:39:43.780 of violence in

00:39:44.380 American discourse

00:39:45.000 or at least

00:39:45.500 willing to turn

00:39:46.040 a blind eye to

00:39:46.640 it.

00:39:48.520 This is written

00:39:49.560 as if anybody

00:39:51.340 can see.

00:39:52.820 It's obviously

00:39:53.320 we're talking

00:39:53.840 about the

00:39:54.180 Republicans and

00:39:55.100 January 6th and

00:39:57.380 you know and

00:39:58.020 related conversation

00:39:58.980 I suppose.

00:40:00.560 Now how could

00:40:02.420 you be blind to

00:40:03.360 the fact that

00:40:04.100 the entire left

00:40:05.000 has been

00:40:05.640 cheering on

00:40:06.280 riots for

00:40:07.060 years and

00:40:09.280 that even

00:40:09.820 political

00:40:10.340 members like

00:40:11.440 Maxine Waters

00:40:13.860 is saying you

00:40:15.300 should go harass

00:40:16.260 people in

00:40:17.500 public.

00:40:18.940 Harass

00:40:19.340 politicians in

00:40:20.080 public.

00:40:20.880 And even

00:40:21.800 Chris Cuomo

00:40:22.780 saying that

00:40:25.080 who said

00:40:26.080 riots need to

00:40:26.740 be peaceful.

00:40:27.940 How in the

00:40:28.600 world could

00:40:30.220 your readers

00:40:30.760 be so dumb

00:40:31.700 as to think

00:40:33.200 that it's the

00:40:34.060 conservatives who

00:40:35.040 are tolerating a

00:40:36.200 little bit of

00:40:36.900 violence?

00:40:38.000 How could they

00:40:38.480 possibly think

00:40:39.320 that?

00:40:40.060 Like you would

00:40:40.440 have to be so

00:40:41.100 deep in the

00:40:41.660 bubble that it's

00:40:44.920 just shocking that

00:40:46.100 that's even a

00:40:46.620 thing.

00:40:47.380 Anyway, here's a

00:40:51.920 persuasion tip.

00:40:53.260 trying to change

00:40:55.520 somebody's mind

00:40:56.200 directly almost

00:40:57.520 never works.

00:40:58.580 So if somebody

00:40:59.060 says X is

00:40:59.920 true, you say

00:41:01.080 no it's not,

00:41:02.280 and even if you

00:41:02.920 show all your

00:41:03.420 sources, it

00:41:04.740 doesn't matter.

00:41:05.820 You're not going

00:41:06.380 to convince anybody

00:41:07.060 of anything most

00:41:07.840 of the time.

00:41:08.840 But sometimes

00:41:10.060 you can trick

00:41:10.960 people into

00:41:11.540 discovering the

00:41:12.280 first clue on

00:41:13.200 their own.

00:41:14.560 And if they

00:41:15.000 find it on

00:41:15.580 their own, then

00:41:16.740 they can change.

00:41:18.280 So here's a

00:41:19.500 persuasion tip.

00:41:20.840 Don't just say

00:41:21.740 you're wrong.

00:41:23.140 Give them some

00:41:24.100 breadcrumbs.

00:41:25.700 And see if they

00:41:26.560 can find the

00:41:27.160 path there.

00:41:28.000 So you notice I

00:41:28.620 said do search

00:41:30.440 on DuckDuckGo

00:41:31.680 and then search

00:41:32.900 on Google?

00:41:33.900 Because if I told

00:41:34.920 them what was

00:41:35.440 there, it wouldn't

00:41:35.980 work at all.

00:41:37.500 They have to have

00:41:38.140 the feeling that

00:41:39.400 they found it

00:41:39.980 out on their own.

00:41:41.420 So I'm giving

00:41:42.160 them the opportunity

00:41:43.040 to generate a

00:41:44.500 feeling that they

00:41:45.880 learned it on

00:41:46.780 their own by

00:41:47.380 searching for it.

00:41:48.860 That's your

00:41:49.460 persuasion tip of

00:41:50.260 the day.

00:41:52.800 I made a claim

00:41:53.860 yesterday, which

00:41:54.540 I'm going to

00:41:54.960 stick to, that

00:41:56.180 is one of my

00:41:57.840 books, How to

00:41:58.780 Fail at Almost

00:41:59.240 Everything and

00:41:59.720 Still Win Big, is

00:42:01.260 the most influential

00:42:02.260 book in America

00:42:03.180 right now.

00:42:06.620 True or false?

00:42:08.860 And by the way,

00:42:09.740 I'm not, this is

00:42:10.820 not hyperbole.

00:42:11.700 This is my actual

00:42:12.580 honest opinion.

00:42:14.240 Based on all the

00:42:15.400 feedback I'm getting

00:42:16.220 and the influence I

00:42:17.160 can see on other

00:42:17.820 books, et cetera,

00:42:18.820 the most influential

00:42:20.160 book in the

00:42:20.740 country, I don't

00:42:22.100 know about other

00:42:22.600 countries, but in

00:42:23.400 this country, is my

00:42:24.760 book, How to Fail.

00:42:26.580 Because Systems Over

00:42:27.800 Goals has taken over.

00:42:30.140 I mean, pretty much

00:42:31.500 it's almost universally

00:42:32.700 understood.

00:42:34.840 The talent stack idea,

00:42:36.700 you see everywhere.

00:42:38.420 And the number of

00:42:39.240 people who have read

00:42:40.880 the book and changed

00:42:41.740 their lives is through

00:42:43.160 the roof at this point.

00:42:44.900 You know, if I asked you

00:42:45.740 in the comments how

00:42:46.740 many people read that

00:42:47.620 book and lost weight,

00:42:50.340 have anybody seen me

00:42:51.600 do that?

00:42:52.620 Let me do it here.

00:42:53.480 I'll just prove this.

00:42:54.600 I know the people on

00:42:55.400 Locals have seen this

00:42:56.860 before, but for the

00:42:57.900 people on YouTube, how

00:43:00.540 many people who read my

00:43:01.500 book, had to fail at

00:43:02.200 almost everything and

00:43:02.820 still win big, either had

00:43:05.540 a big win in business

00:43:08.000 economically or a big win

00:43:11.420 in fitness.

00:43:12.980 Big wins in fitness or

00:43:15.480 economics.

00:43:17.220 Now watch the comments.

00:43:20.560 It's a lot.

00:43:22.260 It's a lot.

00:43:23.840 Yeah.

00:43:24.340 I could read them to you.

00:43:25.680 It changed my life.

00:43:26.700 I lost weight.

00:43:28.280 Fitness, both.

00:43:29.860 Economics, yes.

00:43:31.120 Health.

00:43:32.480 Name one other book

00:43:33.340 that could do that.

00:43:34.760 I've never even heard

00:43:35.500 of it.

00:43:36.540 I've literally never heard

00:43:38.320 of any book that's done

00:43:39.780 this.

00:43:40.000 Have you?

00:43:40.280 Now, there are lots of

00:43:41.860 books that have great

00:43:42.820 stuff in them.

00:43:44.060 For example, back in the

00:43:46.220 day, there was, you know,

00:43:47.340 The Seven Habits of

00:43:48.420 Highly Successful People.

00:43:50.460 But that sort of aged

00:43:51.540 down.

00:43:52.220 You know, it was great.

00:43:53.540 Twelve Rules.

00:43:54.480 I would argue that my book

00:43:56.600 is far more influential

00:43:58.180 than The Twelve Rules, as

00:44:00.760 good as those are.

00:44:05.060 Now, somebody said to me,

00:44:06.900 Atomic Habits is sort of

00:44:08.920 based on my book.

00:44:11.200 Or at least part of it is.

00:44:12.660 And the author will tell you

00:44:16.140 that, by the way.

00:44:18.140 All right.

00:44:20.140 I actually feel bad for Scott.

00:44:22.180 Well, don't.

00:44:22.860 We'll make you go away.

00:44:28.040 All right.

00:44:28.520 So the reason I mention this

00:44:30.780 is, shouldn't it be taught

00:44:35.500 in schools?

00:44:37.620 I feel like something like

00:44:39.420 this should be taught in

00:44:40.340 schools because it's already

00:44:41.720 proven itself as directly

00:44:44.520 useful to everybody's life

00:44:46.220 in the most important ways.

00:44:49.260 I was asked to defend my

00:44:51.980 statement that it's the most

00:44:53.160 influential book in America

00:44:54.420 because somebody said,

00:44:56.580 No, I think that's the Bible,

00:44:57.960 Scott.

00:44:58.840 Duh.

00:44:59.920 I think the Bible has you

00:45:01.520 beat.

00:45:03.380 Does it?

00:45:05.580 Does the Bible have me beat?

00:45:07.860 Now, I'm not saying my book

00:45:09.360 is more important.

00:45:10.980 I didn't say that.

00:45:13.020 I'm saying it's more

00:45:13.880 influential.

00:45:14.380 Have you ever tried to

00:45:16.680 convince a Muslim

00:45:18.600 to change to Christianity

00:45:21.860 by giving them the Bible?

00:45:25.700 It works sometimes.

00:45:27.720 Sometimes.

00:45:28.860 But in general,

00:45:30.560 it's not going to change

00:45:31.460 your religion, is it?

00:45:33.800 And I would argue that

00:45:35.320 by the time you come

00:45:36.400 to the Bible,

00:45:37.120 most people are already

00:45:38.220 convinced.

00:45:38.940 You know, it's sort of

00:45:39.880 additional to it.

00:45:42.540 And I would say also

00:45:43.640 that the Bible is...

00:45:45.760 Do a fact check on this.

00:45:47.860 Isn't Christianity shrinking

00:45:49.840 in the United States?

00:45:52.600 Fact check me on that.

00:45:54.180 Is Christianity growing

00:45:55.600 or shrinking in the

00:45:57.320 United States?

00:45:58.340 I think it's shrinking,

00:45:59.820 right?

00:46:01.100 Shrinking a little bit?

00:46:03.200 And are my ideas

00:46:05.200 growing or shrinking?

00:46:08.360 They're growing.

00:46:08.840 Right?

00:46:11.140 So I'm just being provocative.

00:46:14.000 Nothing should be

00:46:14.740 compared to the Bible.

00:46:16.180 You know, there's some

00:46:16.680 things that nothing

00:46:17.260 should be compared to.

00:46:18.520 Don't compare anything

00:46:19.420 to, you know,

00:46:20.760 the Holocaust.

00:46:21.860 Don't compare anything

00:46:23.000 to Hitler.

00:46:24.120 Don't compare anything

00:46:25.180 to the Bible.

00:46:26.860 They're just...

00:46:27.560 They sort of stand alone.

00:46:28.980 So I'm just being

00:46:29.940 provocative when I say that.

00:46:31.540 But...

00:46:32.600 It is the most

00:46:35.660 influential book in America,

00:46:36.960 I believe,

00:46:37.480 at the moment.

00:46:37.960 There's a politician

00:46:41.620 who's trying to get

00:46:42.280 medical schools

00:46:43.180 to beef up their curriculums

00:46:45.460 for teaching nutrition

00:46:47.240 so that the medical professionals

00:46:49.780 could train their clients

00:46:52.180 in nutrition

00:46:52.820 and there would be,

00:46:53.960 you know,

00:46:54.220 gigantic benefits in health.

00:46:56.280 What do you think

00:46:56.860 of that idea?

00:46:57.740 What do you think

00:46:58.160 of the idea

00:46:58.740 of better training?

00:47:00.360 And it wouldn't be a law,

00:47:03.620 it would just be

00:47:04.060 some kind of recommendation,

00:47:05.220 I guess.

00:47:06.020 Do you think

00:47:06.560 that would be good?

00:47:07.560 To better train

00:47:09.060 doctors on nutrition.

00:47:14.500 I feel like

00:47:15.520 it's a total waste of time.

00:47:19.820 Correct me if I'm wrong.

00:47:21.840 Is there anybody

00:47:22.560 who doesn't know

00:47:23.360 how to eat right?

00:47:26.360 Really?

00:47:27.500 Because I don't know

00:47:28.380 anybody who's overweight

00:47:29.440 who doesn't know why.

00:47:32.480 They just look

00:47:33.300 at their plate.

00:47:34.700 Look at my plate.

00:47:35.760 Here's why.

00:47:37.540 It's right there.

00:47:38.860 Do you think

00:47:39.260 there's anybody

00:47:39.720 who doesn't know

00:47:40.540 you should eat less cake?

00:47:43.580 Maybe a little more sushi?

00:47:46.500 Something like that.

00:47:48.280 I don't know

00:47:49.060 that a doctor

00:47:49.660 is even the right person.

00:47:53.180 And do you have a doctor

00:47:54.900 if you went to the doctor

00:47:56.020 and you've got obviously

00:47:57.260 you have a weight issue

00:47:59.000 that would have an impact

00:48:01.220 on your health?

00:48:01.940 Do you have a doctor

00:48:02.700 who doesn't tell you

00:48:03.620 to lose weight?

00:48:05.440 And if they told you that

00:48:06.660 could you not figure out how?

00:48:10.180 Now again,

00:48:11.260 back to my book

00:48:11.900 How to Filled Almost Everything

00:48:13.000 and Still Went Big.

00:48:13.960 What I teach

00:48:14.720 is a system

00:48:15.540 for how to develop

00:48:18.140 your own system.

00:48:19.960 So in other words

00:48:20.620 it's how to figure out

00:48:22.860 the easiest way

00:48:23.680 to lose weight

00:48:24.320 and to learn about it,

00:48:25.380 et cetera.

00:48:25.620 So that's what I talk about.

00:48:27.080 I don't say

00:48:27.580 use a specific diet.

00:48:30.100 I say

00:48:30.660 your process

00:48:32.140 should be to learn

00:48:32.980 as much as you can

00:48:33.860 about diet choices

00:48:34.980 and what healthy things

00:48:37.180 taste good

00:48:37.780 and how to season them.

00:48:39.400 And basically

00:48:39.880 you use

00:48:40.580 knowledge

00:48:41.640 to substitute

00:48:43.220 for willpower.

00:48:45.400 Does that make sense?

00:48:46.960 I teach you

00:48:47.620 how to use knowledge

00:48:48.740 as a substitute

00:48:50.320 for willpower.

00:48:51.300 Does that make sense?

00:48:54.540 Let me give you

00:48:55.020 an example.

00:48:57.360 If you didn't know

00:48:58.540 how to make

00:48:59.180 food that was

00:49:01.680 good for you

00:49:02.520 also taste good

00:49:03.780 would you eat

00:49:05.320 much good food?

00:49:06.600 Probably not, right?

00:49:07.920 Because in the long term

00:49:08.740 you're going to go

00:49:09.220 for the flavor.

00:49:10.380 So if you didn't know

00:49:11.360 how you lacked

00:49:12.220 knowledge

00:49:12.820 on how to make

00:49:14.040 healthy food

00:49:16.160 taste good

00:49:16.780 then you would eat

00:49:18.820 the wrong food

00:49:19.440 over time.

00:49:20.620 But if you simply

00:49:21.460 had the knowledge

00:49:22.360 you would eat

00:49:24.460 more healthy food

00:49:25.220 and it would be

00:49:25.680 just as good

00:49:26.340 as the other stuff

00:49:27.060 because you knew

00:49:27.600 how to season it.

00:49:29.140 So I say that

00:49:30.300 you can use knowledge

00:49:31.560 as a substitute

00:49:32.920 for willpower.

00:49:34.920 And that most

00:49:35.560 diet plans

00:49:36.620 and even probably

00:49:37.600 what your doctor

00:49:38.200 would tell you

00:49:38.700 would be

00:49:39.480 willpower related

00:49:40.660 and those always fail.

00:49:42.860 Because

00:49:43.340 why do

00:49:44.280 willpower

00:49:45.060 diets

00:49:46.300 always fail?

00:49:46.940 Is there anything

00:49:49.180 I said already

00:49:49.940 today that would

00:49:50.720 tell you why?

00:49:53.080 Willpower

00:49:53.600 diets always fail

00:49:55.060 because they don't

00:49:56.180 take into account

00:49:57.020 human nature.

00:49:58.800 Human nature

00:49:59.560 just doesn't have

00:50:00.340 willpower.

00:50:01.800 Human nature

00:50:02.520 is you go after

00:50:03.360 the biggest attraction.

00:50:04.860 That's it.

00:50:05.900 If something is

00:50:06.580 more attractive

00:50:07.140 than something else

00:50:07.880 you go after it.

00:50:08.960 And you rationalize

00:50:10.080 it later.

00:50:10.540 But you don't have

00:50:10.920 any willpower.

00:50:12.900 Willpower is not

00:50:13.660 even a thing.

00:50:14.920 It's a complete

00:50:15.680 illusion.

00:50:16.940 Willpower is

00:50:18.140 sort of the result.

00:50:19.060 It's not

00:50:19.340 something you have.

00:50:22.240 So

00:50:22.640 if you simply

00:50:23.880 knew that

00:50:24.560 let's say

00:50:25.320 eating pasta

00:50:26.960 was a little

00:50:28.560 bit better for you

00:50:29.340 than eating

00:50:29.760 a white potato

00:50:30.620 and you like

00:50:32.200 them just as much

00:50:33.200 then the knowledge

00:50:34.520 that the pasta

00:50:35.340 doesn't spike

00:50:36.240 your glycemic index

00:50:37.680 as much as

00:50:38.280 the potato does.

00:50:39.440 If you just

00:50:40.000 had that knowledge

00:50:40.820 you could be

00:50:42.260 use no willpower

00:50:43.980 whatsoever

00:50:44.520 and just say

00:50:45.680 oh well

00:50:46.300 I like them

00:50:46.900 both the same

00:50:47.420 I'll have

00:50:47.740 the pasta.

00:50:49.380 Knowledge

00:50:49.820 is a complete

00:50:50.760 substitute

00:50:51.280 for willpower

00:50:51.940 also because

00:50:53.380 willpower

00:50:53.760 doesn't exist.

00:50:56.020 Alright

00:50:56.180 so I think

00:50:57.480 that instead

00:50:58.380 of having

00:50:58.980 doctors

00:50:59.740 tell people

00:51:02.360 about nutrition

00:51:03.020 which I think

00:51:03.760 would just be

00:51:04.380 redundant

00:51:04.780 with what people

00:51:05.560 already know

00:51:06.280 that my book

00:51:07.400 should be

00:51:07.920 required in

00:51:08.720 schools

00:51:09.120 because people

00:51:10.900 who read my book

00:51:11.700 lose weight

00:51:12.380 because they're

00:51:13.420 not using

00:51:13.880 willpower

00:51:14.320 to do it.

00:51:15.140 I take

00:51:15.440 willpower

00:51:15.880 out of the

00:51:16.240 equation.

00:51:17.700 Alright

00:51:17.880 so that's

00:51:19.640 the good way

00:51:20.140 to teach

00:51:20.500 nutrition.

00:51:23.580 Alright

00:51:23.980 here in the

00:51:25.980 category of

00:51:26.720 can you believe

00:51:27.420 this person

00:51:27.960 got elected

00:51:28.520 to office

00:51:29.360 do you know

00:51:31.100 representative

00:51:31.700 Jayapal

00:51:33.520 I may be

00:51:35.260 pronouncing that

00:51:36.060 incorrectly

00:51:36.560 which I do

00:51:37.560 not mean

00:51:37.960 any disrespect

00:51:38.640 by

00:51:39.060 but Jayapal

00:51:40.540 Jayapal

00:51:41.640 representative

00:51:42.800 anyway

00:51:44.000 here's what

00:51:44.940 she actually

00:51:45.480 said

00:51:45.760 this is an

00:51:46.260 actual quote

00:51:47.000 I swear to

00:51:47.740 God

00:51:48.060 I'm not

00:51:48.400 making this

00:51:48.920 up

00:51:49.180 she actually

00:51:50.480 said

00:51:50.880 what I'm

00:51:51.240 going to

00:51:51.420 tell you

00:51:51.840 quote

00:51:52.620 she said

00:51:53.860 that her

00:51:54.160 constituents

00:51:55.000 are quote

00:51:55.740 are not

00:51:56.780 talking about

00:51:57.460 inflation

00:51:58.000 by the way

00:51:59.360 they're talking

00:52:00.560 about hey

00:52:01.180 I don't have

00:52:02.220 enough money

00:52:02.720 in my budget

00:52:03.400 to pay for

00:52:04.040 the things

00:52:04.400 I need

00:52:04.760 to pay

00:52:05.500 for

00:52:05.860 what

00:52:10.640 they're not

00:52:13.100 worried about

00:52:13.600 inflation

00:52:14.160 they're worried

00:52:15.500 that their

00:52:16.060 money won't

00:52:16.560 go that

00:52:16.940 far

00:52:17.280 I don't

00:52:20.680 even know

00:52:21.280 what to say

00:52:21.700 about that

00:52:22.340 like

00:52:24.140 normally

00:52:24.920 when I

00:52:25.320 read the

00:52:25.640 news

00:52:25.920 and somebody

00:52:26.320 is being

00:52:26.640 dumb

00:52:26.940 I'll add

00:52:28.060 something to

00:52:28.660 it

00:52:28.860 like you

00:52:29.380 know

00:52:29.480 round out

00:52:30.020 the story

00:52:30.480 there's

00:52:31.580 nothing to

00:52:31.980 add to

00:52:32.340 this

00:52:32.680 this one

00:52:34.320 you just

00:52:34.600 look at

00:52:34.980 and you

00:52:35.160 go

00:52:35.360 how did

00:52:38.480 she get

00:52:38.900 elected

00:52:39.320 anyway

00:52:40.960 I saw

00:52:44.580 that in

00:52:44.880 a Joel

00:52:45.300 Pollack

00:52:45.820 tweet

00:52:46.340 anyway

00:52:47.540 Thomas

00:52:47.980 Massey

00:52:48.420 tweets

00:52:50.680 in response

00:52:51.500 to a

00:52:51.920 FOIA

00:52:52.200 request

00:52:52.780 the CDC

00:52:54.000 literally

00:52:54.520 just admitted

00:52:55.220 they haven't

00:52:55.800 documented

00:52:56.320 a single

00:52:57.120 case

00:52:57.660 of an

00:52:58.480 unvaccinated

00:52:59.340 individual

00:52:59.960 with natural

00:53:00.760 immunity

00:53:01.220 spreading the

00:53:02.540 virus

00:53:02.880 so in

00:53:03.200 other words

00:53:03.620 the CDC

00:53:05.040 does not

00:53:05.700 have one

00:53:06.180 documented

00:53:06.700 case

00:53:07.100 of somebody

00:53:07.500 who got

00:53:07.860 the virus

00:53:08.420 recovered

00:53:09.720 and then

00:53:12.180 somehow

00:53:12.740 spread it

00:53:13.960 later

00:53:14.240 which

00:53:16.160 you know

00:53:16.580 certainly

00:53:18.300 asks the

00:53:19.000 question

00:53:19.320 why

00:53:19.700 people

00:53:20.300 with natural

00:53:20.760 immunity

00:53:21.160 don't have

00:53:22.000 the same

00:53:22.320 rights

00:53:22.600 as the

00:53:23.160 vaccinated

00:53:23.580 now

00:53:24.840 the fact

00:53:25.920 that the

00:53:26.240 CDC

00:53:26.640 does not

00:53:27.900 have that

00:53:28.300 documented

00:53:28.900 does that

00:53:29.320 mean it

00:53:29.600 doesn't

00:53:29.880 exist

00:53:30.300 does that

00:53:32.140 mean it

00:53:32.420 doesn't

00:53:32.700 exist

00:53:33.140 because I'm

00:53:34.120 not sure

00:53:34.480 that's the

00:53:34.940 same

00:53:35.620 exactly

00:53:36.200 so I'll

00:53:36.740 just put a

00:53:37.140 little

00:53:37.380 little yellow

00:53:38.460 flag on

00:53:39.060 this one

00:53:39.440 it could be

00:53:40.700 a really good

00:53:41.540 point that

00:53:42.140 would lead us

00:53:42.640 to some

00:53:43.060 deeper

00:53:43.340 knowledge

00:53:43.740 or it

00:53:44.480 could be

00:53:44.980 that maybe

00:53:46.240 the CDC

00:53:46.860 just

00:53:47.240 I don't know

00:53:48.600 saw some

00:53:50.540 studies but

00:53:51.340 they didn't

00:53:51.720 document it

00:53:52.380 themselves

00:53:52.860 I don't know

00:53:53.820 something like

00:53:54.280 that

00:53:54.520 so I'm not

00:53:55.520 sure this

00:53:56.120 means what

00:53:56.560 we think

00:53:56.980 but it's

00:53:57.380 certainly

00:53:57.660 a flag

00:53:59.820 so here's

00:54:02.160 something to

00:54:02.740 make you lose

00:54:03.520 all trust in

00:54:05.120 your government

00:54:05.560 if you haven't

00:54:06.080 already

00:54:06.340 so you know

00:54:07.280 about the

00:54:07.580 FBI raid on

00:54:09.280 Project Veritas

00:54:10.200 right

00:54:10.640 so the

00:54:11.820 Project Veritas

00:54:12.560 guys were

00:54:13.200 raided by the

00:54:13.740 FBI quite

00:54:14.700 aggressively

00:54:15.180 and over

00:54:17.460 nothing as far

00:54:18.300 as we can

00:54:18.660 tell I mean

00:54:19.220 it was over

00:54:19.660 Biden's

00:54:21.040 daughter's

00:54:21.580 diary

00:54:22.040 but when you

00:54:23.160 hear what

00:54:23.720 Project Veritas

00:54:25.660 did with the

00:54:26.500 diary oh

00:54:27.460 here's something

00:54:27.980 really clever

00:54:28.580 I forgot to

00:54:29.980 tell you about

00:54:30.380 this

00:54:30.620 so Project

00:54:31.960 Veritas

00:54:32.300 is given

00:54:33.340 this diary

00:54:33.920 apparently they

00:54:34.620 didn't steal

00:54:35.140 it somebody

00:54:35.520 gave it to

00:54:35.960 them and

00:54:37.040 they could

00:54:37.480 not verify

00:54:38.120 that it was

00:54:38.700 real and

00:54:39.740 therefore decided

00:54:41.040 not to use

00:54:41.720 it

00:54:42.020 do you hear

00:54:44.000 that

00:54:44.300 the people

00:54:46.280 most reviled

00:54:47.720 for being

00:54:48.940 you know

00:54:49.340 illegitimate

00:54:50.620 by the

00:54:51.440 by the

00:54:51.920 fake news

00:54:52.400 industry

00:54:52.820 they wouldn't

00:54:55.240 publish this

00:54:56.200 because they

00:54:58.160 couldn't verify

00:54:58.840 it was real

00:54:59.500 that's I

00:55:03.180 mean think

00:55:04.100 about that

00:55:04.680 okay but

00:55:05.920 here's the

00:55:06.200 best part

00:55:06.680 here's the

00:55:08.140 best part

00:55:08.660 so then

00:55:10.020 apparently

00:55:11.420 Project

00:55:12.000 Veritas

00:55:12.580 offered to

00:55:14.240 give it

00:55:14.640 back to

00:55:16.420 the Bidens

00:55:17.840 maybe to

00:55:19.120 either to

00:55:19.720 the rightful

00:55:21.220 owner I think

00:55:22.160 to the rightful

00:55:22.680 owner through

00:55:23.960 an attorney

00:55:24.780 and the

00:55:25.960 attorney said

00:55:26.900 no and

00:55:29.000 did not

00:55:29.460 accept it

00:55:30.400 but also

00:55:34.180 didn't debunk

00:55:35.740 it oh

00:55:37.160 actually I

00:55:37.540 don't know if

00:55:37.900 they accepted

00:55:38.360 it or not

00:55:38.760 but they

00:55:39.380 didn't debunk

00:55:40.020 it do you

00:55:42.720 know what

00:55:42.940 that is

00:55:43.400 that's how

00:55:45.060 Project

00:55:45.580 Veritas

00:55:46.040 confirmed it

00:55:47.140 was real

00:55:47.600 they confirmed

00:55:49.880 it was real

00:55:50.600 by giving

00:55:51.920 it back

00:55:52.580 how clever

00:55:55.040 is that

00:55:55.680 because if

00:55:57.680 if they had

00:55:58.360 said oh

00:55:59.260 yeah that's

00:55:59.700 ours we'll

00:56:01.100 take it back

00:56:01.780 then it's

00:56:03.100 confirmed but

00:56:04.360 also if they

00:56:05.300 said no we

00:56:06.660 won't take it

00:56:07.340 back and

00:56:08.500 they don't say

00:56:09.360 one way or

00:56:09.980 another whether

00:56:10.540 it's theirs

00:56:11.120 then it's

00:56:12.740 theirs

00:56:13.040 right

00:56:14.480 think about

00:56:16.020 how clever

00:56:16.460 that was

00:56:17.020 he actually

00:56:18.560 confirmed it

00:56:19.480 by giving

00:56:20.540 it back

00:56:21.040 or attempting

00:56:22.300 to give it

00:56:22.800 back and

00:56:23.620 whatever the

00:56:24.140 response was

00:56:24.880 would be the

00:56:25.340 confirmation

00:56:25.820 it's really

00:56:27.660 clever so

00:56:28.800 now that you

00:56:29.400 know that

00:56:29.700 Project

00:56:30.020 Veritas

00:56:30.420 did this

00:56:32.100 and you

00:56:32.560 also need

00:56:32.960 to know

00:56:33.180 that Project

00:56:33.640 Veritas was

00:56:34.400 suing the

00:56:34.980 New York

00:56:35.240 Times over

00:56:36.040 some

00:56:37.000 alleged

00:56:38.040 wrong

00:56:40.720 statements

00:56:41.140 about them

00:56:41.620 and now

00:56:45.340 we find

00:56:45.740 out that

00:56:46.380 I hope

00:56:48.900 my story

00:56:49.400 is not

00:56:49.800 lost here

00:56:50.420 and now

00:56:51.180 we find

00:56:51.520 out that

00:56:52.380 from

00:56:54.280 Harmeet

00:56:54.880 Dillon

00:56:55.620 who's

00:56:56.040 an attorney

00:56:56.480 I guess

00:56:57.360 she's an

00:56:57.700 attorney for

00:56:58.140 Project

00:56:58.600 Veritas

00:56:59.040 and other

00:56:59.600 things

00:56:59.900 and

00:57:01.020 suddenly

00:57:03.020 the

00:57:03.480 New York

00:57:06.940 Times get

00:57:07.400 tipped off

00:57:08.040 by the

00:57:08.400 Feds

00:57:08.780 about

00:57:10.240 well anyway

00:57:13.440 so what are

00:57:14.320 the odds

00:57:14.700 that the

00:57:15.660 New York

00:57:16.880 Times would

00:57:17.800 be getting

00:57:19.160 sued by

00:57:19.740 Project

00:57:20.140 Veritas

00:57:20.540 and then

00:57:21.580 the Feds

00:57:22.020 would tell

00:57:22.360 the New York

00:57:22.840 Times

00:57:23.280 almost immediately

00:57:24.620 about the

00:57:25.520 raid on

00:57:25.920 Project

00:57:26.300 Veritas

00:57:26.660 so in

00:57:27.380 other words

00:57:27.760 there's a

00:57:28.180 New York

00:57:28.440 Times

00:57:28.860 connection

00:57:30.980 with the

00:57:31.760 Feds

00:57:32.960 that is

00:57:34.300 very

00:57:34.540 disturbing

00:57:35.060 so that's

00:57:36.440 the story

00:57:37.160 and it

00:57:39.160 doesn't seem

00:57:39.740 to be for

00:57:40.280 the benefit

00:57:40.700 of the

00:57:40.960 country

00:57:41.280 it's not

00:57:42.440 like they're

00:57:42.920 both

00:57:43.440 patriots

00:57:44.060 it looks

00:57:44.980 like something

00:57:45.580 super weaselly

00:57:46.600 is going

00:57:47.000 on here

00:57:47.460 and massive

00:57:48.940 corruption

00:57:49.420 here's my

00:57:50.820 mystery of

00:57:51.340 the day

00:57:51.660 Bill Gates

00:57:52.340 said

00:57:53.320 that vaccines

00:57:55.920 only quote

00:57:56.680 a slightly

00:57:57.280 reduced

00:57:57.820 transmission

00:57:58.600 to which

00:58:00.540 I said

00:58:01.180 wait what

00:58:02.180 the official

00:58:04.300 story

00:58:04.900 is that

00:58:05.740 they greatly

00:58:06.460 reduced

00:58:07.460 transmission

00:58:08.060 like a

00:58:08.520 lot

00:58:08.840 you know

00:58:09.840 not like

00:58:10.260 20%

00:58:10.880 I'm talking

00:58:11.460 like you

00:58:12.200 know

00:58:12.320 800%

00:58:13.160 times

00:58:13.680 we're talking

00:58:14.180 about

00:58:14.440 a lot

00:58:15.460 but Bill

00:58:17.700 Gates

00:58:18.140 who I

00:58:19.340 would imagine

00:58:20.080 is one of the

00:58:20.560 most well

00:58:21.340 informed people

00:58:22.160 in the country

00:58:22.740 and smart

00:58:23.780 seems to

00:58:25.300 believe the

00:58:25.740 opposite

00:58:26.180 of the

00:58:27.120 official

00:58:27.440 story

00:58:27.900 why would

00:58:29.420 that be

00:58:29.800 I don't

00:58:31.720 know the

00:58:32.000 answer

00:58:32.220 to that

00:58:32.500 and we

00:58:32.800 can't

00:58:33.000 read

00:58:33.140 his mind

00:58:33.500 but let

00:58:33.800 me

00:58:33.880 give you

00:58:34.300 some more

00:58:34.660 on this

00:58:34.880 story

00:58:35.180 so then

00:58:36.340 when I

00:58:36.740 asked that

00:58:37.180 somebody

00:58:37.720 sent me

00:58:38.320 a study

00:58:39.160 that seemed

00:58:40.240 to indicate

00:58:40.920 but from

00:58:41.320 September

00:58:41.760 they indicated

00:58:43.200 that there

00:58:43.720 was no

00:58:44.640 correlation

00:58:45.220 between

00:58:45.760 vaccination

00:58:46.440 rates

00:58:47.040 and

00:58:47.760 lowering

00:58:49.280 transmission

00:58:49.940 so there's

00:58:52.240 an actual

00:58:52.600 study of

00:58:53.220 different

00:58:53.500 countries

00:58:53.960 and they

00:58:54.880 look at

00:58:55.480 the vaccination

00:58:55.980 rates

00:58:56.560 and they

00:58:57.200 say there's

00:58:57.520 no correlation

00:58:58.160 the more

00:58:59.480 vaccinated

00:59:00.020 you are

00:59:00.640 it doesn't

00:59:01.060 seem to

00:59:01.400 have any

00:59:01.840 impact on

00:59:03.320 transmission

00:59:03.900 so is

00:59:06.080 Bill Gates

00:59:06.500 right

00:59:06.800 so he

00:59:08.640 says so

00:59:09.200 and you

00:59:09.680 know he's

00:59:09.920 pretty well

00:59:10.320 informed

00:59:10.760 and there's

00:59:12.500 this serious

00:59:13.240 study of

00:59:14.740 a number of

00:59:15.280 different

00:59:15.480 countries that

00:59:16.080 showed there

00:59:16.380 was no

00:59:16.620 correlation

00:59:17.140 and that

00:59:18.320 would

00:59:18.720 indicate

00:59:19.300 exactly what

00:59:21.080 Bill Gates

00:59:21.520 said that

00:59:22.340 the vaccinations

00:59:23.500 don't reduce

00:59:25.960 transmission

00:59:26.560 do you think

00:59:28.020 that's the

00:59:28.420 whole story

00:59:29.060 right there

00:59:29.480 do you think

00:59:30.420 I'm done

00:59:30.860 nope

00:59:32.220 nope

00:59:33.040 because it

00:59:33.880 took about

00:59:34.240 a minute

00:59:34.660 for Jason

00:59:36.300 Lewis

00:59:36.680 who is also

00:59:37.880 a medical

00:59:38.320 researcher

00:59:38.840 PhD

00:59:39.360 smart guy

00:59:40.580 knows what

00:59:41.080 he's doing

00:59:41.440 and he does

00:59:42.540 medical research

00:59:43.240 so he knows

00:59:44.500 how to do

00:59:44.900 this stuff

00:59:45.280 so he looks

00:59:47.120 at it

00:59:47.480 and basically

00:59:48.800 he shows you

00:59:49.800 the data

00:59:50.360 that is exactly

00:59:51.160 the opposite

00:59:51.760 right

00:59:53.920 in the United

00:59:54.520 States

00:59:54.980 for example

00:59:55.600 and the other

00:59:56.160 thing said

00:59:56.580 that in the

00:59:56.980 United States

00:59:57.460 there was

00:59:57.720 also no

00:59:58.160 correlation

00:59:58.600 but according

00:59:59.700 to Jason

01:00:00.740 Lewis

01:00:01.080 who seems

01:00:01.900 very credible

01:00:02.660 at least

01:00:03.280 as far as

01:00:04.100 you can tell

01:00:04.500 on Twitter

01:00:05.020 shows us

01:00:06.860 the data

01:00:07.300 that sees

01:00:07.760 the opposite

01:00:08.460 it's the

01:00:09.780 exact opposite

01:00:10.480 and strongly

01:00:11.380 the opposite

01:00:11.960 what do you

01:00:13.960 think of that

01:00:14.440 so what is

01:00:15.420 true

01:00:15.680 we've got

01:00:16.620 one study

01:00:17.220 that we

01:00:17.560 can't verify

01:00:18.500 that says

01:00:19.880 there's no

01:00:20.260 correlation

01:00:20.720 we've got

01:00:22.080 another study

01:00:22.760 that says

01:00:23.360 oh yeah

01:00:23.800 it's really

01:00:24.140 strong

01:00:24.500 here it is

01:00:25.500 well

01:00:27.440 let's say

01:00:28.980 a few

01:00:29.260 things about

01:00:29.880 the study

01:00:30.640 that said

01:00:30.980 there's no

01:00:31.360 correlation

01:00:31.840 do you think

01:00:33.140 that anybody

01:00:33.620 can compare

01:00:34.320 countries

01:00:34.900 different countries

01:00:35.860 and determine

01:00:36.900 that one

01:00:38.440 variable

01:00:38.980 in that country

01:00:39.960 worked

01:00:40.640 it's not a

01:00:42.620 thing

01:00:42.900 if you wanted

01:00:44.680 to find out

01:00:45.740 if the

01:00:46.580 vaccinations

01:00:47.080 were reducing

01:00:47.940 the spread

01:00:48.800 you would need

01:00:49.940 two countries

01:00:50.660 that are exactly

01:00:51.340 the same

01:00:51.900 not sort

01:00:53.480 of similar

01:00:53.960 in your

01:00:54.340 mind

01:00:54.800 but exactly

01:00:55.560 the same

01:00:56.060 and one

01:00:57.420 with vaccinations

01:00:58.120 one without

01:00:58.780 then you might

01:00:59.940 have something

01:01:00.500 especially if you

01:01:01.580 did multiple

01:01:02.040 countries

01:01:02.520 with multiple

01:01:03.640 scenarios like

01:01:04.540 that

01:01:04.800 but if you're

01:01:06.480 just looking

01:01:06.940 at an apple

01:01:08.180 and an orange

01:01:08.940 which is what

01:01:09.900 any two country

01:01:10.720 comparisons are

01:01:11.600 because there's

01:01:12.300 lots of stuff

01:01:13.200 different in

01:01:13.680 every country

01:01:14.260 if you're looking

01:01:15.560 at an apple

01:01:16.160 and an orange

01:01:16.740 and you say

01:01:17.220 the apple

01:01:17.640 did better

01:01:18.120 than the orange

01:01:18.720 you really

01:01:20.180 haven't said

01:01:21.140 anything

01:01:21.660 because there

01:01:23.320 are all kinds

01:01:23.980 of differences

01:01:24.460 between an apple

01:01:25.340 and an orange

01:01:25.920 and why are you

01:01:27.000 picking out one

01:01:27.600 variable and

01:01:28.220 imagining that

01:01:28.940 nothing else

01:01:30.100 is changing

01:01:30.600 let me give you

01:01:31.760 a hint of what

01:01:32.480 else could be

01:01:33.080 wrong

01:01:33.440 do you think

01:01:34.360 there's a

01:01:34.740 correlation

01:01:35.180 between how

01:01:36.560 vaccinated a

01:01:37.440 country is

01:01:38.100 and how

01:01:38.940 aggressively

01:01:39.580 they test

01:01:40.840 there is

01:01:43.940 right

01:01:44.240 probably the

01:01:47.120 most advanced

01:01:48.420 countries with

01:01:49.320 the best

01:01:49.640 health care

01:01:50.080 systems

01:01:50.580 the ones

01:01:51.420 who would

01:01:51.720 vaccinate

01:01:52.320 the most

01:01:52.900 probably also

01:01:54.080 have the

01:01:54.360 best testing

01:01:55.120 so if you

01:01:57.540 test more

01:01:58.200 do you find

01:01:59.040 more

01:01:59.340 of course

01:01:59.780 you do

01:02:00.100 right

01:02:00.960 so you

01:02:01.820 should expect

01:02:02.540 you should

01:02:04.420 expect

01:02:04.860 that the

01:02:05.780 more vaccinated

01:02:06.440 you are

01:02:07.060 the more

01:02:07.720 testing you're

01:02:08.380 doing too

01:02:08.860 and you

01:02:09.720 should have

01:02:10.240 the most

01:02:10.900 cases

01:02:11.520 where there's

01:02:12.560 the most

01:02:12.880 vaccinations

01:02:13.440 because they're

01:02:14.100 looking for

01:02:14.540 the most

01:02:14.840 cases

01:02:15.240 right

01:02:16.600 doesn't that

01:02:18.240 make sense

01:02:18.600 to you

01:02:18.960 all right

01:02:20.920 here's another

01:02:21.400 one

01:02:21.880 how many of

01:02:24.140 you had this

01:02:24.620 experience

01:02:25.140 after you

01:02:25.740 got vaccinated

01:02:26.400 you changed

01:02:27.100 your behavior

01:02:27.720 to riskier

01:02:28.660 behavior

01:02:29.140 anybody

01:02:30.220 I did

01:02:30.980 did anybody

01:02:32.700 change their

01:02:33.780 behavior to

01:02:34.520 riskier behavior

01:02:35.540 after they got

01:02:36.380 vaccinated

01:02:36.820 yeah look at

01:02:38.800 the yeses

01:02:39.420 right

01:02:40.580 there's still

01:02:41.280 some no's

01:02:41.900 but it

01:02:44.240 looks like

01:02:44.640 most people

01:02:45.500 did

01:02:45.760 I did

01:02:46.560 let's say

01:02:49.060 you had

01:02:49.360 been single

01:02:49.920 if you had

01:02:51.040 been single

01:02:51.580 and you

01:02:52.420 were unvaccinated

01:02:53.440 do you think

01:02:54.760 you might

01:02:55.060 sit it out

01:02:55.740 and say

01:02:56.940 I don't even

01:02:57.920 think I'm

01:02:58.280 going to date

01:02:58.860 now let's

01:03:00.580 say you get

01:03:01.040 fully vaccinated

01:03:01.840 and you know

01:03:02.600 you say

01:03:02.980 I'll only date

01:03:03.840 somebody who's

01:03:04.280 fully vaccinated

01:03:05.020 well then you're

01:03:06.160 going to go

01:03:06.400 nuts right

01:03:07.000 because you

01:03:08.040 can say

01:03:08.260 well that's

01:03:08.620 close enough

01:03:09.200 I got the

01:03:09.880 risk down

01:03:10.340 to where I

01:03:10.680 want it

01:03:10.960 I'll do

01:03:11.220 that

01:03:11.440 so the

01:03:12.660 other thing

01:03:13.020 is where

01:03:13.680 people are

01:03:14.620 most vaccinated

01:03:15.500 they should

01:03:16.060 also be

01:03:16.600 the least

01:03:17.320 cautious

01:03:17.800 how do

01:03:19.100 they calculate

01:03:19.880 that

01:03:20.240 how about

01:03:22.340 this

01:03:22.700 and do

01:03:24.720 the places

01:03:25.420 that have

01:03:25.800 the most

01:03:26.140 vaccinations

01:03:26.740 also drop

01:03:27.560 the restrictions

01:03:28.220 well of

01:03:29.640 course

01:03:30.000 of course

01:03:31.540 because if

01:03:32.260 the vaccination

01:03:32.760 rate gets

01:03:33.340 high enough

01:03:33.820 it's harder

01:03:34.560 to keep

01:03:34.980 all the

01:03:35.240 restrictions

01:03:35.720 on

01:03:36.000 so there's

01:03:37.680 that too

01:03:38.080 all right

01:03:39.100 so I

01:03:40.500 don't believe

01:03:41.200 that Bill

01:03:42.000 Gates is

01:03:42.500 necessarily

01:03:43.200 right on

01:03:43.840 this

01:03:44.100 and I'm

01:03:44.820 going to

01:03:45.120 take a

01:03:45.800 stand

01:03:46.160 against him

01:03:46.880 on this

01:03:48.640 question

01:03:49.180 now

01:03:50.120 remember I

01:03:51.860 taught you

01:03:52.240 that if I

01:03:52.720 sort of make

01:03:53.340 a statistical

01:03:54.260 argument

01:03:55.540 it doesn't

01:03:56.140 mean I'm

01:03:56.460 wrong if it

01:03:56.980 doesn't happen

01:03:57.480 it just

01:03:58.860 means that

01:03:59.480 that's how

01:04:00.140 statistics work

01:04:01.040 so here's

01:04:03.520 my thinking

01:04:04.060 here are the

01:04:05.220 parts I think

01:04:05.960 we do know

01:04:06.500 about the

01:04:06.860 vaccination

01:04:07.360 it makes

01:04:08.120 it far

01:04:08.460 less likely

01:04:09.040 that you'll

01:04:09.480 get it in

01:04:09.900 the first

01:04:10.200 place

01:04:10.560 true or

01:04:11.120 false

01:04:11.420 would you

01:04:12.960 agree that

01:04:13.600 being vaccinated

01:04:14.480 has a big

01:04:16.160 impact on

01:04:16.800 whether you

01:04:17.160 get it in

01:04:17.860 the first

01:04:18.220 place

01:04:18.660 seeing some

01:04:21.800 differences of

01:04:22.620 opinions

01:04:23.020 so I think

01:04:24.320 separately from

01:04:25.440 the infection

01:04:26.220 rate I think

01:04:27.180 that we do

01:04:27.720 know that

01:04:28.280 that you're

01:04:29.340 less likely

01:04:29.860 to get

01:04:30.220 it

01:04:30.740 now

01:04:31.380 so vaccinated

01:04:36.180 you're less

01:04:36.680 likely to get

01:04:37.240 it

01:04:37.400 do we also

01:04:38.160 know that

01:04:38.840 it will clear

01:04:39.600 up faster

01:04:40.220 if you're

01:04:40.660 vaccinated

01:04:41.080 in other

01:04:42.000 words if

01:04:43.540 a vaccinated

01:04:44.700 and unvaccinated

01:04:45.600 person get

01:04:46.140 infected at the

01:04:46.880 same time

01:04:47.500 won't the

01:04:48.980 vaccinated person

01:04:50.000 recover in

01:04:51.300 say half the

01:04:52.080 time

01:04:52.360 I think so

01:04:54.140 so I would

01:04:55.220 say that

01:04:55.660 common sense

01:04:56.480 which is

01:04:57.680 often wrong

01:04:58.640 and logic

01:05:00.180 dictate that

01:05:01.260 if fewer

01:05:02.040 people are

01:05:02.480 getting it

01:05:02.960 and they're

01:05:03.320 having it

01:05:03.760 for less

01:05:04.180 time

01:05:04.620 even if

01:05:05.440 they had

01:05:05.840 the same

01:05:06.260 viral load

01:05:07.040 vaccinated

01:05:08.140 people would

01:05:08.760 spread it

01:05:09.120 way less

01:05:09.680 even if

01:05:11.720 they had

01:05:12.020 the same

01:05:12.340 viral load

01:05:12.980 because they

01:05:13.580 have it

01:05:13.840 for half

01:05:14.200 the time

01:05:14.680 and they

01:05:16.260 only get

01:05:16.740 it maybe

01:05:17.500 20% as

01:05:18.420 often

01:05:18.780 so

01:05:20.620 I would

01:05:23.380 say this

01:05:23.780 is one of

01:05:24.200 my opinions

01:05:24.720 that you've

01:05:25.160 got to put

01:05:25.540 a really

01:05:26.020 big question

01:05:27.920 mark on

01:05:28.520 because I

01:05:29.520 have a

01:05:29.920 question

01:05:30.220 mark on

01:05:30.600 my own

01:05:30.920 opinion

01:05:31.180 I could

01:05:31.960 easily be

01:05:32.740 convinced

01:05:33.140 in either

01:05:33.700 direction

01:05:34.100 at this

01:05:34.440 point

01:05:34.660 I could

01:05:35.340 easily

01:05:35.780 be

01:05:36.040 convinced

01:05:36.480 so

01:05:37.840 some

01:05:38.220 to watch

01:05:39.020 for

01:05:39.320 John

01:05:41.900 Kerry is

01:05:42.360 giving China

01:05:42.960 a pass

01:05:43.760 he's the

01:05:44.340 main climate

01:05:44.960 guy

01:05:45.220 so he's

01:05:45.560 not making

01:05:46.000 trouble

01:05:46.360 in China

01:05:47.600 about the

01:05:48.060 Uyghur

01:05:48.420 situation

01:05:49.040 ethnic

01:05:49.500 genocide

01:05:50.260 and so

01:05:51.240 I tweeted

01:05:51.660 that

01:05:52.060 Hitler's

01:05:53.460 biggest

01:05:53.740 strategic

01:05:54.340 failure

01:05:54.760 was not

01:05:55.240 making

01:05:55.520 Germany's

01:05:56.000 economy

01:05:56.400 essential

01:05:56.960 to the

01:05:57.340 world

01:05:57.520 supply

01:05:57.980 chain

01:05:58.380 before

01:05:59.420 he

01:05:59.680 embarked

01:06:00.100 on

01:06:00.280 ethnic

01:06:00.760 genocide

01:06:01.280 but

01:06:02.900 China

01:06:03.560 did it

01:06:03.940 right

01:06:04.240 if you're

01:06:05.300 going to

01:06:05.460 do

01:06:05.620 ethnic

01:06:06.080 genocide

01:06:06.500 you need

01:06:06.940 to make

01:06:07.200 the world

01:06:07.580 dependent

01:06:08.040 on you

01:06:08.580 first

01:06:09.020 and then

01:06:10.060 they'll

01:06:10.220 let you

01:06:10.480 do it

01:06:10.840 so I

01:06:12.880 always

01:06:13.140 thought

01:06:13.360 that

01:06:13.560 never

01:06:13.840 again

01:06:14.220 was

01:06:15.820 not

01:06:16.340 just

01:06:16.640 specific

01:06:17.140 to the

01:06:17.720 Jewish

01:06:18.200 community

01:06:18.760 you know

01:06:20.240 I suppose

01:06:21.080 it is

01:06:21.600 though

01:06:22.020 I mean

01:06:22.560 when I

01:06:22.800 see this

01:06:23.160 happening

01:06:23.480 I guess

01:06:23.980 the never

01:06:24.760 again

01:06:25.000 is just

01:06:25.640 for the

01:06:26.600 Jewish

01:06:26.840 community

01:06:27.320 because

01:06:28.060 it's

01:06:28.260 happening

01:06:28.600 there's

01:06:30.160 an

01:06:30.320 ethnic

01:06:30.840 cleansing

01:06:31.780 going on

01:06:32.340 right now

01:06:32.920 so you

01:06:33.740 can't say

01:06:34.120 that didn't

01:06:34.540 happen again

01:06:35.080 because it's

01:06:35.640 happening

01:06:35.940 right now

01:06:36.760 and

01:06:38.300 John Kerry

01:06:40.980 doesn't seem

01:06:41.460 to care

01:06:41.760 as long as

01:06:42.380 China has

01:06:43.340 a supply

01:06:44.000 chain

01:06:44.260 all right

01:06:45.420 speaking of

01:06:46.660 supply chain

01:06:47.220 Joshua Steinman

01:06:48.780 who you should

01:06:49.520 follow on

01:06:50.260 Twitter also

01:06:50.880 expert in

01:06:53.040 cyber security

01:06:53.780 as well as

01:06:54.700 other things

01:06:55.100 he said

01:06:55.740 he used to

01:06:56.200 coordinate

01:06:56.700 under Trump

01:06:57.500 he coordinated

01:06:58.060 the US

01:06:58.500 supply chain

01:06:59.040 policy

01:06:59.560 when he was

01:07:01.080 on the

01:07:01.400 National Security

01:07:02.180 Council

01:07:02.520 and he had

01:07:04.340 some ideas

01:07:04.900 that I tweeted

01:07:05.620 you can go

01:07:06.160 see him

01:07:06.400 you should

01:07:06.640 follow him

01:07:07.160 Joshua Steinman

01:07:08.880 S-T-E-I-N-M-A-N

01:07:11.200 and his

01:07:13.280 you'll find him

01:07:14.560 easily

01:07:14.820 and he was

01:07:17.020 talking about

01:07:17.480 creating American

01:07:18.240 manufacturing hubs

01:07:19.480 so in other words

01:07:21.100 you pick a region

01:07:22.180 that's the perfect

01:07:22.980 region

01:07:23.520 transportation wise

01:07:24.860 and energy wise

01:07:25.700 and you just

01:07:26.740 build all the

01:07:28.300 parts for

01:07:29.740 let's say

01:07:30.160 microchips

01:07:30.780 or some

01:07:32.800 other zone

01:07:33.320 might be

01:07:33.800 the full

01:07:34.740 supply chain

01:07:35.460 for some

01:07:36.100 other industry

01:07:36.720 and apparently

01:07:37.720 it works

01:07:39.540 in some

01:07:40.140 Asian countries

01:07:41.080 and it's

01:07:41.820 just a good

01:07:42.300 model

01:07:42.660 but I don't

01:07:43.660 know that we

01:07:44.040 have anybody

01:07:44.480 in this country

01:07:45.180 who could

01:07:45.600 organize something

01:07:46.340 like that

01:07:46.820 maybe need

01:07:48.180 more of a

01:07:48.620 totalitarian

01:07:49.280 government

01:07:50.360 to pull that

01:07:51.020 off

01:07:51.260 but it's

01:07:53.040 a good

01:07:53.240 idea

01:07:53.540 and we

01:07:53.840 should

01:07:54.080 try to

01:07:57.040 study a

01:07:57.500 subject

01:07:57.780 first

01:07:58.300 Scott

01:07:59.300 James

01:08:00.200 let me

01:08:00.620 talk to

01:08:01.000 you

01:08:01.300 James

01:08:02.420 James

01:08:02.700 first of all

01:08:03.800 if you

01:08:05.500 and I

01:08:05.940 so James

01:08:07.040 says

01:08:07.340 try to

01:08:07.800 study a

01:08:08.280 subject

01:08:08.520 first

01:08:09.140 Scott

01:08:09.680 number

01:08:11.880 number one

01:08:12.160 James

01:08:12.540 the odds

01:08:14.280 are

01:08:14.540 I know

01:08:15.420 more about

01:08:15.860 these topics

01:08:16.460 than you

01:08:16.840 the odds

01:08:18.220 are you're

01:08:18.640 wrong

01:08:19.020 and I'm

01:08:19.920 right

01:08:20.220 and it

01:08:20.640 makes you

01:08:20.920 think I

01:08:21.260 didn't

01:08:21.420 study

01:08:21.720 enough

01:08:22.020 why do

01:08:23.340 I say

01:08:23.600 that

01:08:23.920 because

01:08:26.100 that's

01:08:26.680 my usual

01:08:27.640 experience

01:08:28.360 it doesn't

01:08:30.340 mean I'm

01:08:30.640 right all

01:08:30.980 the time

01:08:31.380 but the

01:08:32.120 only reason

01:08:32.840 I get

01:08:34.580 to do

01:08:34.920 this

01:08:35.260 is because

01:08:36.560 I'm right

01:08:36.980 more than

01:08:37.400 most people

01:08:38.000 so statistically

01:08:40.160 speaking if I

01:08:41.300 didn't know

01:08:41.580 anything about

01:08:42.140 you I

01:08:43.240 would say

01:08:43.560 I'm probably

01:08:44.220 right and

01:08:45.180 you're probably

01:08:45.540 just wrong

01:08:46.100 and it looks

01:08:46.640 like I'm

01:08:47.020 wrong because

01:08:47.600 we disagree

01:08:48.320 number two

01:08:49.800 try to

01:08:50.860 understand what

01:08:51.540 this live

01:08:52.080 stream is

01:08:52.640 if you came

01:08:54.120 to this live

01:08:54.740 stream for

01:08:55.260 science

01:08:55.820 well you're

01:08:57.200 pretty dumb

01:08:57.740 because this

01:08:59.120 isn't science

01:08:59.800 if you came

01:09:01.080 to this to

01:09:01.760 see what

01:09:03.020 questions the

01:09:04.640 public has

01:09:05.900 because the

01:09:07.140 fake news

01:09:07.900 is not

01:09:08.260 giving them

01:09:08.800 everything

01:09:09.160 they need

01:09:09.720 this would

01:09:10.460 be a good

01:09:10.760 place to

01:09:11.160 come

01:09:11.460 because I

01:09:12.900 try to

01:09:13.320 approach the

01:09:13.960 news like

01:09:14.940 a consumer

01:09:15.680 I'm not

01:09:17.120 trying to

01:09:17.600 approach the

01:09:18.120 news as

01:09:18.620 an expert

01:09:19.140 if I were

01:09:20.340 approaching it

01:09:20.860 as an expert

01:09:21.440 then yeah

01:09:22.240 I'd do a

01:09:23.260 deep dive

01:09:23.720 and everything

01:09:24.160 I'd have to

01:09:24.680 before I

01:09:25.280 talked about

01:09:25.700 it but

01:09:26.420 I'm doing

01:09:26.800 it as a

01:09:27.360 consumer who

01:09:28.120 looks at

01:09:28.780 the news

01:09:29.200 and says

01:09:29.660 I'm not

01:09:30.440 getting any

01:09:30.860 news here

01:09:31.380 why don't

01:09:32.880 I have any

01:09:33.360 news

01:09:33.740 why is the

01:09:34.380 news lying

01:09:34.920 to me

01:09:35.340 right

01:09:36.200 so that's

01:09:37.280 that's the

01:09:38.500 point of this

01:09:39.260 live stream

01:09:40.040 is to be

01:09:41.300 basically on

01:09:42.200 your side

01:09:42.720 asking the

01:09:43.220 same questions

01:09:43.780 that you

01:09:44.100 would ask

01:09:44.540 but on top

01:09:45.660 of that

01:09:46.000 I have one

01:09:47.160 expertise

01:09:47.800 maybe two

01:09:49.200 if you count

01:09:50.180 business

01:09:50.680 but persuasion

01:09:51.980 and risk

01:09:53.460 management

01:09:53.880 decisions

01:09:54.420 are areas

01:09:55.480 that I do

01:09:56.140 have expertise

01:09:56.720 in

01:09:57.020 and

01:09:58.040 so in

01:09:59.960 those cases

01:10:00.540 I'll go

01:10:00.920 deeper

01:10:01.260 but for

01:10:01.940 everything

01:10:02.300 else

01:10:02.720 I'm taking

01:10:04.280 a consumer's

01:10:05.300 view

01:10:05.540 and I

01:10:06.440 think that

01:10:07.260 we need to

01:10:08.320 lean on the

01:10:08.880 media and

01:10:09.400 science to

01:10:10.280 answer these

01:10:11.220 questions

01:10:11.880 yes and

01:10:13.480 bullshit detection

01:10:14.260 I think I

01:10:15.020 add that to

01:10:15.680 the mix as

01:10:16.500 well

01:10:16.680 so

01:10:17.880 I keep

01:10:21.100 being asked

01:10:21.620 about Norm

01:10:22.100 McDonald's

01:10:22.720 fictional

01:10:23.380 autobiography

01:10:24.540 review

01:10:25.340 I gotta tell

01:10:27.720 you I'm not

01:10:28.100 gonna read it

01:10:28.720 so you

01:10:30.560 could ask me

01:10:31.040 every day

01:10:31.500 and you

01:10:32.740 do

01:10:33.000 you ask me

01:10:34.240 every day

01:10:34.740 and I'm

01:10:35.360 sure it's

01:10:35.640 good

01:10:35.920 I just

01:10:37.200 I just

01:10:38.440 am not

01:10:39.040 gonna read

01:10:39.360 any books

01:10:39.820 I don't

01:10:41.160 know when

01:10:41.460 the next

01:10:42.000 time I'll

01:10:42.360 read a

01:10:42.600 book

01:10:42.740 the only

01:10:43.360 time I

01:10:43.740 read books

01:10:44.300 is on

01:10:44.800 airplanes

01:10:45.240 and I'm

01:10:45.920 not flying

01:10:46.420 anywhere

01:10:46.740 so I

01:10:48.540 have no

01:10:48.920 no plans

01:10:49.820 to read a

01:10:50.260 book

01:10:50.500 anytime soon

01:10:51.960 and I

01:10:53.860 also think

01:10:54.500 that in

01:10:55.160 the world

01:10:55.600 of the

01:10:55.880 internet

01:10:56.220 reading an

01:10:57.560 entire book

01:10:58.240 is

01:10:59.400 doesn't

01:11:00.600 make as

01:11:00.940 much sense

01:11:01.440 as it

01:11:01.720 used to

01:11:02.080 so

01:11:03.320 if you're

01:11:04.340 entertained

01:11:04.640 by it

01:11:05.080 sure

01:11:05.300 but

01:11:05.680 if you're

01:11:06.900 doing it

01:11:07.200 for

01:11:07.360 information

01:11:08.020 you can

01:11:09.460 find the

01:11:09.940 summary

01:11:10.240 somewhere

01:11:10.720 oh

01:11:14.540 somebody

01:11:14.780 says

01:11:15.020 Bill Gates

01:11:15.520 is

01:11:15.860 increasing

01:11:16.720 the

01:11:17.360 the demand

01:11:19.460 for

01:11:19.700 therapeutics

01:11:20.560 maybe

01:11:22.080 maybe

01:11:23.520 yeah

01:11:29.840 there

01:11:30.380 there

01:11:30.400 have

01:11:30.920 been

01:11:31.040 years

01:11:31.380 where

01:11:31.620 I

01:11:31.740 wrote

01:11:32.060 more

01:11:32.320 books

01:11:32.600 than

01:11:32.800 I

01:11:32.960 read

01:11:33.220 I

01:11:33.960 don't

01:11:34.100 know

01:11:34.220 if

01:11:34.340 anybody

01:11:34.580 can

01:11:34.780 say

01:11:34.960 that

01:11:35.300 besides

01:11:35.800 me

01:11:36.160 audible

01:11:38.160 books

01:11:38.780 are

01:11:38.920 still

01:11:39.100 good

01:11:39.320 yeah

01:11:39.540 especially

01:11:40.160 if

01:11:40.380 you're

01:11:40.500 doing

01:11:40.720 something

01:11:41.120 if

01:11:41.940 you're

01:11:42.120 exercising

01:11:42.660 all

01:11:43.480 right

01:11:43.600 that's

01:11:43.840 all

01:11:43.960 for

01:11:44.060 now

01:11:44.460 and

01:11:45.400 oh

01:11:46.440 I

01:11:46.620 ran

01:11:46.820 long

01:11:47.160 yes

01:11:48.920 I

01:11:49.120 ran

01:11:49.260 very

01:11:49.480 long

01:11:49.780 all

01:11:50.280 right

01:11:50.380 I'll

01:11:50.680 talk

01:11:50.840 to

01:11:50.960 you

01:11:51.180 tomorrow

01:11:52.140 all

01:11:53.340 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 12, 2021

Episode 1559 Scott Adams： Today's Show Will Mostly be About the Public Brainwashing We Are All Experiencing

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript