Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1559 Scott Adams： Today's Show Will Mostly be About the Public Brainwashing We Are All Experiencing

00:00:00.880 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and everything in between, which we value equally.

00:00:07.580 This is the best thing that could have ever happened to you.

00:00:11.660 Yeah, it's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and how lucky that you either stumbled in here by luck, congratulations to you,

00:00:19.760 or you're so smart that you know you should come here every day.

00:00:23.920 Either way, it's a great, great way to start the day.

00:00:27.500 And if you'd like to take it up another notch, yeah, it's possible.

00:00:31.760 I know, I know, it doesn't seem like it could get any better, right?

00:00:35.200 But watch this. It's called the simultaneous sip, and no matter how good your day has started, it takes it up another level.

00:00:43.180 I know you won't believe it until you try it yourself, but let's try it.

00:00:46.660 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:52.560 I like coffee.

00:00:53.380 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:58.720 The dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, including your antibodies.

00:01:04.820 Don't believe me? Watch this. Go.

00:01:10.520 Mmm.

00:01:11.880 Can you feel your antibodies bristling?

00:01:15.820 They're bristling with power now.

00:01:17.680 The only way you can tell is you feel a little bit extra friction.

00:01:23.780 It's from the bristles.

00:01:26.020 That's science.

00:01:28.560 Well, as Marty Blartfest pointed out in a tweet today,

00:01:34.440 that Elon Musk was very clever to do a Twitter poll asking people if he should sell a bunch of his Tesla stock.

00:01:42.500 Why was that clever? Anybody? Anybody?

00:01:45.120 I'll tell you why it was clever.

00:01:50.480 It was clever because he warned the public ahead of time and framed it.

00:01:55.040 He framed it as a citizen trying to pay taxes.

00:02:00.820 How much better could you do?

00:02:02.760 You couldn't do any better than that.

00:02:04.440 Because if he had simply just sold it, and I think he had to, maybe to pay off some obligations from some other tax thing.

00:02:13.660 And imagine if he just sold it and didn't tell anybody that the stock would die, if it would look like he's lost faith.

00:02:23.180 And of course, that would be ridiculous because it's only $5 billion, which is not much for him.

00:02:28.060 But it would have looked bad.

00:02:31.520 But because he did this little Twitter poll, he made us think that the issue was paying taxes.

00:02:38.360 And we all kind of went along with that.

00:02:40.880 It was kind of genius.

00:02:42.180 And he's very, if you watch Musk, he's very consistent in understanding the room.

00:02:52.200 You know, able to work the room and work your impressions of the room.

00:02:57.060 You know, Tesla famously doesn't do advertising. 0.99

00:03:01.620 They don't do advertising.

00:03:04.200 Do me a fact check on that.

00:03:05.500 I think that's true, right?

00:03:06.440 They don't do advertising.

00:03:07.320 Instead, they just make good products that people want to talk about.

00:03:12.740 And then Elon Musk does things that people want to talk about.

00:03:16.820 Every time Elon Musk does something you think is a little crazy and provocative and maybe he shouldn't have done it,

00:03:23.340 if you're not simultaneously thinking to yourself, oh, they don't do regular marketing.

00:03:29.300 They draw your attention in non-traditional ways.

00:03:32.600 Once you realize that, it's a little more transparent what he's up to.

00:03:37.320 Have I told you that I was expecting a hit piece on me?

00:03:44.720 Because it's the political season starting to heat up again as we get to 2022.

00:03:50.520 So how many thought my prediction would be good, that there would be a hit piece on me?

00:03:54.980 Well, yesterday on Twitter, a journalist for SFGate, so this would be a local left-leaning publication,

00:04:08.080 asked if I would like to be the subject of a profile.

00:04:13.860 A profile.

00:04:14.380 Do you know what it means when a journalist asks somebody who talks about politics

00:04:21.360 if they could do a profile on him? 0.85

00:04:26.480 Well, I'm sad to say that I used to be dumb enough to fall for this, and did.

00:04:32.920 When I say used to, I'm not talking about when I was in my 20s and I didn't have much experience.

00:04:38.980 I'm talking about I fell for this trick five years ago, four years ago.

00:04:44.480 I fell for this with Bloomberg.

00:04:47.160 So Bloomberg had a journalist who said, hey, we want to do a big feature piece profile on you.

00:04:52.160 And I thought to myself, wow, Bloomberg's a pretty big publication,

00:04:57.520 and they want to do a feature piece on me.

00:05:00.040 This will be great.

00:05:01.300 I can mention my website and sell some books.

00:05:05.680 This couldn't be better.

00:05:07.740 That wasn't two years ago.

00:05:09.120 Now, that was like 2017, maybe?

00:05:14.360 Somebody do a fact check on that. 1.00

00:05:16.060 The Bloomberg article on me.

00:05:17.800 2017, I think.

00:05:20.520 No, was it before the election?

00:05:23.940 2016, maybe.

00:05:26.060 Anyway, the point is that Bloomberg clearly was playing on the Democrat team,

00:05:32.220 clearly sent somebody to take me out,

00:05:34.680 did not count on me retweeting it because I'm a little bit anti-fragile,

00:05:42.280 meaning that the more you attack me, the stronger I get.

00:05:45.820 And I don't think they quite counted on that.

00:05:49.420 And so, indeed, my profile went up instead of down.

00:05:52.700 But they took a run at it.

00:05:54.420 They took a pretty good run at it.

00:05:55.740 And if you were to Google my name,

00:05:57.900 the fake news industry would put their article at the top.

00:06:02.860 So, if you do a search for me,

00:06:05.980 now, I don't know if it's still the case,

00:06:07.840 but if you did it on Google and you did it,

00:06:12.200 oh, March 2017 is when the Bloomberg article was.

00:06:15.480 But if you did a search on that today,

00:06:17.240 I don't know if it would still be there,

00:06:18.800 but during the election, it was the top result.

00:06:22.120 So, if anybody saw something I said and said,

00:06:24.300 ah, I better check out this guy,

00:06:26.160 see if I should listen to more of what he says or not,

00:06:28.700 they would have seen that top result.

00:06:30.840 It was just a hit piece. 0.99

00:06:31.760 I'm just a ridiculous hit piece. 0.75

00:06:34.520 So, when the SFGate asked if they could do a profile piece on me, 0.94

00:06:40.640 I, of course, said, thank you, but no thank you.

00:06:45.200 So, they're coming.

00:06:48.020 They're coming.

00:06:49.200 Now, this won't be the last one.

00:06:51.180 And I would expect that at least somebody will write a piece

00:06:53.900 without my involvement.

00:06:55.720 It's far more credible if you can get the topic of your hit piece

00:07:00.000 to be part of it, which is what I used to fall for.

00:07:04.260 Oh, I think this will be good.

00:07:06.280 I'll just say good things,

00:07:08.220 and then that's all they can write about.

00:07:10.220 Nope.

00:07:11.080 They can just make up anything they want.

00:07:13.440 And they do.

00:07:14.960 All right.

00:07:15.380 Here's more on my theme that Democrats uniquely don't understand human motivation.

00:07:23.100 Every time I give you one of these examples, 0.84

00:07:25.760 put it in the bin in your brain with the other examples

00:07:29.100 of Democrats not understanding human motivation.

00:07:32.900 It's the problem with all of their stuff.

00:07:36.220 All of their policies have the same hole.

00:07:38.340 The humans don't act the way they hope they do.

00:07:43.040 Conservatives typically get the human part right.

00:07:46.660 Consistently.

00:07:47.800 Consistently.

00:07:48.820 Now, it might look like the conservatives are being more cruel

00:07:52.840 because they can be more harsh in their worldview,

00:07:56.540 but it's because it works.

00:07:59.100 There's no other reason.

00:08:00.680 The only reason is because it works,

00:08:03.140 and the other things don't work.

00:08:04.740 I'm almost positive that if you could find out that,

00:08:09.380 let's say, socialism worked,

00:08:12.240 you know, I don't think you could prove that,

00:08:14.380 but let's say pure socialism,

00:08:15.820 not the little bit like the Europeans do, 1.00

00:08:18.700 but if you could prove that pure socialism actually worked,

00:08:22.760 I think you could convince conservatives, too.

00:08:25.480 It's just that it can't be proved because it doesn't,

00:08:28.340 and it violates everything you know about human behavior.

00:08:31.820 But here's a new example.

00:08:33.300 And Greg Gottfeld tweeted this about CNN's coverage.

00:08:38.300 So the subject was the Rittenhouse trial,

00:08:44.100 Kyle Rittenhouse on trial for self-defense that they call murder.

00:08:48.780 And the chyron on CNN,

00:08:50.380 and Don Lemon was on there with two other people,

00:08:52.440 the chyron said,

00:08:53.580 conservatives embrace, comma, celebrate white vigilantism.

00:08:58.260 Oh, what?

00:09:02.220 Is that the most, let's say, unaware interpretation of conservatives?

00:09:14.720 Let me just give you a thought experiment.

00:09:19.140 Just a thought experiment.

00:09:20.620 Imagine that Kyle Rittenhouse had been black

00:09:23.680 and then imagine that exactly everything else was exactly the same 0.82

00:09:30.200 and that the people he shot were three white people,

00:09:34.300 just like Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:09:35.580 How would conservatives see this?

00:09:41.960 Do you think the conservatives would say,

00:09:43.700 oh, wait a minute, 0.96

00:09:44.660 I didn't realize that the shooter was black 0.93

00:09:47.140 and now self-defense doesn't matter

00:09:49.820 and I don't like the Second Amendment anymore?

00:09:52.580 Are you kidding me?

00:09:53.960 Are you kidding me?

00:09:58.660 See if I'm wrong.

00:10:00.720 I believe 100%, 100%, not even 99%,

00:10:05.020 I believe 100% of conservatives would say,

00:10:07.780 under the same facts, right,

00:10:09.520 that the facts have to be identical.

00:10:11.600 I think 100% of conservatives would say,

00:10:14.720 yeah, that's still self-defense.

00:10:17.220 That's still self-defense.

00:10:20.560 I'm looking at your comments

00:10:21.820 and you're all agreeing with me, right?

00:10:23.140 So anybody who has even a little bit of understanding

00:10:26.420 of the conservative philosophy,

00:10:29.040 there is no question about this one.

00:10:32.080 And to imagine, as CNN does,

00:10:34.740 to imagine in their usual mind-reading way,

00:10:38.220 to imagine that conservatives are seeing this to be about race,

00:10:42.500 this is so not about race.

00:10:45.760 Let me ask you something.

00:10:47.360 If a conservative sees an issue,

00:10:49.540 it involves a gun

00:10:50.560 and it also involves race,

00:10:54.040 which one's bigger in their mind?

00:10:57.720 Yeah, there's a racial component.

00:10:59.920 Maybe it's not that important to the story,

00:11:01.600 but there's a racial component.

00:11:03.300 And then there's a gun

00:11:04.260 and they're both important to the story.

00:11:06.640 The conservatives care about the gun.

00:11:08.960 The gun.

00:11:10.460 Right?

00:11:11.460 The Constitution.

00:11:12.480 This is easy stuff.

00:11:15.320 But the left,

00:11:16.320 I don't know if they don't know it

00:11:17.480 or they pretend they don't know it.

00:11:19.140 It's always hard to tell.

00:11:21.380 All right.

00:11:22.280 So as Greg Gutfeld pointed out,

00:11:24.560 the CNN has for months,

00:11:28.260 if not years,

00:11:29.640 cheered on the violent protests,

00:11:33.000 the Antifa,

00:11:33.880 the BLM,

00:11:34.420 and in direct language,

00:11:36.160 Chris Cuomo said directly

00:11:38.100 that, you know,

00:11:40.000 who said riots have to be peaceful?

00:11:42.640 Essentially supporting the fact

00:11:44.200 that some forms of protest

00:11:46.400 are going to get a little violent.

00:11:49.660 And then when the most obvious thing happens,

00:11:52.780 which is you rail against the police forever

00:11:55.920 and you defund the police

00:11:57.140 and you say,

00:11:58.460 yeah, it's fine to have these peaceful protests

00:12:00.400 that are actually violent,

00:12:02.200 how did you not think

00:12:04.780 a vigilante would appear?

00:12:08.680 Before Kyle,

00:12:10.540 did I not tell you

00:12:11.720 that vigilantes would appear?

00:12:14.980 Now, I don't think he was a vigilante.

00:12:17.460 So first of all,

00:12:19.060 don't buy their frame

00:12:20.120 because he wasn't a vigilante

00:12:21.780 or anything like it.

00:12:23.440 But I did tell you

00:12:24.580 the vigilantes were guaranteed

00:12:26.160 and I don't think Kyle's one of them,

00:12:28.520 but he's getting thrown into that group.

00:12:30.460 So it should have been predictable

00:12:32.980 that somebody would,

00:12:35.300 you know,

00:12:35.680 you could call him a vigilante,

00:12:37.140 but I would call him

00:12:38.020 just a patriot

00:12:39.860 who maybe made a decision

00:12:42.080 that shouldn't have been made.

00:12:44.620 But certainly his intention

00:12:45.860 was in the right place.

00:12:47.140 It looks like it to me.

00:12:49.660 So, Democrats,

00:12:51.300 you got what you asked for,

00:12:53.800 a world without police,

00:12:55.420 but you got to take it all.

00:12:57.060 You don't get just the good parts.

00:12:58.380 You don't get the part

00:12:59.960 where there's fewer police shootings

00:13:02.620 without the part

00:13:03.360 where there's more crime.

00:13:05.140 At least if defunding the police

00:13:06.840 is your only technique.

00:13:08.600 All right.

00:13:09.860 I have a rule

00:13:10.940 that you should never be taken seriously 0.99

00:13:13.060 if you have a porn mustache. 0.98

00:13:16.280 Can we all agree on this? 0.98

00:13:18.660 If you've got like a goatee or a beard,

00:13:21.460 maybe.

00:13:22.640 You know,

00:13:22.960 I'll take you seriously

00:13:23.980 if you've got a full goatee or a beard.

00:13:26.400 But can we take people seriously

00:13:30.020 who just have a mustache,

00:13:32.480 like a big, big old mustache?

00:13:35.180 I would say no.

00:13:37.000 And is it my imagination

00:13:38.440 or is Kyle Rittenhouse

00:13:40.760 being prosecuted by

00:13:42.440 Gary Oldman in Batman?

00:13:46.220 Am I wrong?

00:13:48.960 Right?

00:13:49.520 The prosecutor?

00:13:50.700 That's just Gary Oldman

00:13:51.980 in the Batman movies, right?

00:13:53.560 I think I'm right.

00:13:57.680 But there's new mustache news.

00:14:00.680 I said the same thing about...

00:14:03.340 Oh, I can't remember his name.

00:14:04.640 Never mind.

00:14:05.880 But Biden is nominating

00:14:07.620 a new head for the FDA,

00:14:09.620 the presumably corrupt group

00:14:12.760 in government.

00:14:13.380 I say presumably corrupt

00:14:14.760 based on what we've observed

00:14:17.500 in the last year.

00:14:18.520 I can't prove it,

00:14:21.040 so I don't have data,

00:14:22.420 but the smart assumption

00:14:25.060 is that the FDA is corrupt

00:14:27.180 and that money is behind it.

00:14:30.600 And I say that because

00:14:31.720 of the experience

00:14:32.400 with the rapid testing,

00:14:34.440 you know,

00:14:34.580 the slow approval of that.

00:14:35.980 If you look into that,

00:14:36.900 you'll see there is

00:14:38.220 no explanation for it,

00:14:39.700 which means there's

00:14:41.340 one explanation for it.

00:14:43.140 Now, I'd love to be wrong,

00:14:45.060 and I'd love to find out

00:14:45.980 that all the members

00:14:46.680 of the FDA are great patriots

00:14:49.520 and doing the best they can.

00:14:50.980 And there's no monetary anything.

00:14:54.520 But I doubt it.

00:14:55.720 So anyway,

00:14:56.280 the guy who's being nominated,

00:14:57.460 Dr. Rob Caliph,

00:14:59.540 he's got a big old porn mustache. 0.99

00:15:02.180 He's being put in charge 0.99

00:15:03.480 of the, you know,

00:15:05.440 maybe the entity

00:15:06.640 besides the Supreme Court

00:15:08.420 that we should take

00:15:09.140 most seriously.

00:15:11.180 Right?

00:15:11.660 It's one of the most serious jobs

00:15:13.740 you could ever have,

00:15:14.480 head of the FDA. 0.89

00:15:15.500 And we put porn mustache guy there. 0.81

00:15:18.920 Now, 0.98

00:15:19.920 porn mustache guy, 0.98

00:15:21.480 we only know one thing about him.

00:15:23.120 Well, two.

00:15:23.920 We know his name.

00:15:26.080 The second thing we know about him

00:15:27.440 is the one thing we know

00:15:28.660 he decided on,

00:15:30.040 he got wrong.

00:15:31.680 I wonder if I should have

00:15:32.920 a big old mustache.

00:15:35.360 If the,

00:15:36.260 if you're wearing a big,

00:15:37.840 um,

00:15:39.600 error in judgment

00:15:40.560 right on your face,

00:15:41.600 how are we supposed

00:15:44.060 to take the rest of it

00:15:45.120 seriously?

00:15:46.520 Now,

00:15:47.020 I've said that,

00:15:47.740 uh,

00:15:48.020 Trump had the same problem

00:15:49.200 with his unusual haircut,

00:15:51.020 Boris Johnson too.

00:15:52.420 Although I've come to think

00:15:53.660 that,

00:15:54.000 uh,

00:15:54.660 a,

00:15:55.280 an unusual haircut

00:15:56.540 might actually be an advantage

00:15:57.980 because people can't look away.

00:16:00.020 But the mustache

00:16:00.840 is different.

00:16:02.340 The mustache is

00:16:03.520 too normal.

00:16:05.980 Right?

00:16:06.540 You know,

00:16:06.760 having,

00:16:07.200 having wild hair

00:16:08.240 is,

00:16:08.640 is,

00:16:09.120 uh,

00:16:09.300 far less normal.

00:16:11.160 So,

00:16:11.760 I don't think you put

00:16:13.040 the mustache guy

00:16:14.000 in charge of the FDA.

00:16:14.980 That's all I'm saying.

00:16:16.160 And by the way,

00:16:16.660 this is speaking

00:16:17.600 in terms of persuasion.

00:16:19.820 You know,

00:16:20.060 I'm sure he's very qualified.

00:16:21.920 But persuasion-wise,

00:16:23.220 it's a bad look.

00:16:24.180 Let's talk about

00:16:24.920 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:16:25.800 and what's happening.

00:16:27.220 Are you all aware

00:16:28.100 of what the fake news industry,

00:16:30.140 the FNI,

00:16:30.780 is doing right now?

00:16:32.220 So the fake news industry,

00:16:33.740 I include,

00:16:34.720 if I can reach over here,

00:16:36.280 hold on,

00:16:42.580 audio problem.

00:16:45.880 So the FNI,

00:16:47.380 or fake news industry,

00:16:48.800 that I,

00:16:49.240 I include the social media networks

00:16:51.520 in part of that.

00:16:55.060 This is the play

00:16:56.200 they're running

00:16:56.680 on the country right now,

00:16:59.160 which is,

00:17:00.280 there are several narratives

00:17:01.880 that can come out

00:17:02.860 of the Rittenhouse trial.

00:17:04.580 One of them

00:17:05.160 is white supremacy.

00:17:06.280 Even though

00:17:08.520 there's no white supremacy

00:17:10.420 anywhere in the story.

00:17:12.320 There's no white supremacy

00:17:14.220 anywhere in the story.

00:17:16.240 There's nobody who was one.

00:17:18.000 Nobody did anything racial.

00:17:19.900 It was something

00:17:20.400 that white people 0.52

00:17:21.040 did to each other.

00:17:22.900 No trace of white supremacy.

00:17:24.480 But the narrative

00:17:26.800 is that the country 0.87

00:17:28.200 is full of white supremacy.

00:17:30.040 So Kyle is being tied to this. 0.95

00:17:32.000 Biden even called him

00:17:33.080 a white supremacist,

00:17:34.140 which he should be sued for, 0.95

00:17:35.640 if not lose his job.

00:17:37.720 Biden, that is.

00:17:38.360 He should lose his job for that.

00:17:40.220 He should be kicked out

00:17:41.260 of the presidency

00:17:41.860 for attacking a citizen

00:17:43.940 and not even correcting it.

00:17:47.300 I suppose if he'd corrected it,

00:17:48.920 if Biden did,

00:17:49.980 I'd be willing to say,

00:17:51.360 that was just a terrible mistake.

00:17:53.880 Well, you don't want

00:17:54.660 to lose a president over it?

00:17:56.460 Not correcting it?

00:17:57.760 Not correcting

00:17:59.800 that Biden called

00:18:01.920 this young man

00:18:03.120 a white supremacist

00:18:04.160 with no evidence whatsoever

00:18:06.640 that that was the case.

00:18:08.360 You need to be fired for that

00:18:10.340 if you're the president.

00:18:12.320 That should be the end of it.

00:18:13.580 They should just walk you

00:18:14.700 out of the office. 1.00

00:18:16.060 They should put your shit in a box 1.00

00:18:17.680 and get out of the office 1.00

00:18:19.300 because you are embarrassing

00:18:20.960 the country.

00:18:21.640 At that point,

00:18:22.460 you're so far from the,

00:18:25.520 let's say,

00:18:26.300 the culture of the United States

00:18:28.920 and what is right

00:18:29.920 and what every single person

00:18:31.400 thinks is right.

00:18:32.620 You need to go.

00:18:34.360 All right? 1.00

00:18:34.900 And being mentally incompetent, 0.98

00:18:36.400 that's not good enough. 0.97

00:18:37.900 You need to be out of that job

00:18:39.560 right away.

00:18:41.460 Here's something

00:18:42.080 that Trump never did.

00:18:44.360 Attack voters.

00:18:46.880 He never did that.

00:18:48.560 He attacked people

00:18:49.380 who attacked him.

00:18:50.160 That's different.

00:18:51.360 But he didn't go after

00:18:52.220 like an individual

00:18:53.460 in the news

00:18:54.180 and call him

00:18:54.700 something like 0.96

00:18:55.960 a white supremacist. 0.78

00:18:57.300 I mean, 0.90

00:18:57.480 that's so far over the line.

00:18:59.480 That should be

00:19:00.300 immediate.

00:19:01.860 Lose your job.

00:19:03.000 Anyway,

00:19:03.300 the other narrative

00:19:04.080 is that white men 1.00

00:19:05.340 are bad, 0.99

00:19:06.000 of course,

00:19:06.640 so there'll be more of that.

00:19:07.740 He's a white man.

00:19:08.840 Look at all these white men 1.00

00:19:09.900 doing bad things. 0.98

00:19:11.720 The other narrative

00:19:12.520 is about guns,

00:19:14.060 gun control.

00:19:14.920 You know,

00:19:15.060 hey,

00:19:15.440 if you have guns, 0.97

00:19:16.380 people are going to get killed. 0.93

00:19:17.960 Blah, blah. 0.90

00:19:18.360 And then there's

00:19:18.960 the unequal justice one,

00:19:20.680 which will pretend

00:19:21.900 that this case

00:19:22.900 is like other cases

00:19:24.220 where there's

00:19:24.720 a black defendant.

00:19:26.660 Is this case

00:19:27.760 anything

00:19:28.380 like any of those

00:19:30.020 other cases?

00:19:31.740 It's so,

00:19:33.540 yeah,

00:19:33.880 we're seeing it

00:19:34.960 in the comments

00:19:35.520 on locals.

00:19:36.820 These cases

00:19:37.740 are all unique.

00:19:39.380 There are no

00:19:39.820 two of these cases

00:19:41.220 that should be compared.

00:19:42.500 And the moment

00:19:43.780 you make an analogy

00:19:45.340 of these cases,

00:19:47.300 you've abandoned

00:19:47.900 all rational

00:19:49.780 discourse

00:19:50.400 because they're

00:19:52.960 just different things.

00:19:54.340 There's nothing

00:19:54.900 in common with them.

00:19:56.620 So,

00:19:57.140 here's the play.

00:19:59.040 The CNNs

00:20:00.180 and the fake news

00:20:01.000 industry of the world

00:20:01.840 will push these narratives

00:20:03.640 which will cause

00:20:04.660 riots and conflict

00:20:05.880 and lots of things

00:20:07.060 to talk about.

00:20:08.060 That will get them

00:20:08.860 lots of clicks

00:20:09.480 and they will make

00:20:10.060 more money

00:20:10.660 and it will increase

00:20:12.340 their political power.

00:20:14.140 Now,

00:20:15.340 you can see this,

00:20:17.000 right?

00:20:17.220 You all see

00:20:19.360 this forming

00:20:20.120 because now that

00:20:21.620 we've seen the cycle

00:20:22.800 enough times

00:20:23.420 you can see it early.

00:20:25.320 I feel like

00:20:26.300 there was a time

00:20:27.080 we wouldn't have

00:20:28.540 noticed this,

00:20:29.700 right?

00:20:30.360 There was a time

00:20:31.300 you wouldn't have

00:20:32.040 really known

00:20:32.560 this was going on

00:20:33.660 but now it's

00:20:34.520 all transparent.

00:20:35.820 I don't think

00:20:36.500 they try to hide it

00:20:37.360 anymore

00:20:37.720 because it's clear

00:20:38.920 that they don't need to.

00:20:40.600 They can just do it

00:20:41.280 right in front of you.

00:20:42.480 There's no penalty.

00:20:46.360 All right,

00:20:46.900 so let me talk

00:20:47.460 some more

00:20:47.820 about Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:20:49.480 How many of you

00:20:50.260 who watched it

00:20:51.120 think he was

00:20:51.900 fake crying?

00:20:54.060 This will be

00:20:54.600 an interesting question.

00:20:56.180 I'm very interested

00:20:56.960 in your answer to this.

00:20:58.500 How many of you

00:20:59.060 think he was

00:20:59.760 fake crying?

00:21:02.680 I'm seeing all

00:21:03.760 no's on Locals

00:21:05.520 and on YouTube

00:21:06.600 I'm seeing

00:21:08.340 nobody thinks

00:21:09.340 it was fake.

00:21:10.520 50-50?

00:21:12.040 Somebody says

00:21:12.620 PTSD?

00:21:13.120 Well, I saw

00:21:15.040 LeBron James

00:21:16.060 mock Kyle Rittenhouse

00:21:18.420 because he thought

00:21:19.860 it was fake crying

00:21:20.780 obviously

00:21:21.140 and he said

00:21:21.500 there's no tears.

00:21:23.480 Now, if I told you

00:21:24.440 there were no tears

00:21:25.480 I don't know

00:21:25.960 if you noticed

00:21:26.500 but I looked at it

00:21:27.600 again

00:21:27.760 and I didn't see any.

00:21:29.360 If there were

00:21:29.880 no tears

00:21:30.720 was it real?

00:21:32.340 Well, I mean

00:21:36.920 we can't read

00:21:37.460 his mind

00:21:37.960 but let me give you

00:21:39.120 LeBron knows

00:21:42.800 how to cry.

00:21:44.740 Let me give you

00:21:45.960 my take on this.

00:21:47.740 I put myself

00:21:48.540 in his position.

00:21:50.180 Suppose you were

00:21:51.200 Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:21:52.760 How would you feel

00:21:54.020 about the fact

00:21:55.140 that you took

00:21:56.320 two lives

00:21:57.100 and you were

00:21:58.060 being blamed

00:21:58.800 as a murderer 0.99

00:21:59.700 and a white supremacist 0.78

00:22:00.960 in public?

00:22:02.340 How would you feel

00:22:02.980 about that?

00:22:04.540 You'd feel

00:22:05.180 really shook

00:22:06.140 and I think

00:22:07.080 the word that

00:22:07.700 captures it best

00:22:09.540 is shook.

00:22:11.300 PTSD maybe

00:22:12.320 but just

00:22:13.740 shook to your core.

00:22:16.120 Now, let me ask

00:22:16.700 you the second question.

00:22:18.460 Do you think

00:22:18.900 he's sad

00:22:19.660 that he shot 1.00

00:22:20.900 those motherfuckers? 1.00

00:22:23.180 Nope. 1.00

00:22:24.460 Nope.

00:22:24.960 Why would he be?

00:22:25.820 Would you be?

00:22:26.880 Would you be sad 1.00

00:22:27.920 that you killed 1.00

00:22:28.480 those particular people

00:22:29.720 in those particular

00:22:30.800 circumstances?

00:22:31.400 I wouldn't be.

00:22:33.620 Do you think

00:22:34.380 that if I were

00:22:36.320 in this situation

00:22:37.160 that I would

00:22:38.620 act shook?

00:22:40.760 Yes.

00:22:42.120 Would I have

00:22:42.660 trouble even

00:22:43.380 forming words?

00:22:46.160 Maybe.

00:22:47.320 Probably.

00:22:49.120 Would I shed 1.00

00:22:50.340 a fucking tear? 1.00

00:22:53.060 Not one. 1.00

00:22:54.720 Not one.

00:22:56.240 There would not

00:22:57.200 be a tear.

00:22:57.740 because tears

00:22:58.940 are with sadness

00:23:00.100 and I don't

00:23:02.540 think he has

00:23:03.200 to be sad

00:23:03.700 about who he killed.

00:23:05.160 In fact,

00:23:05.760 they were people,

00:23:06.540 if I may

00:23:07.060 speak frankly,

00:23:09.680 that nobody's

00:23:10.740 going to miss.

00:23:12.500 I mean,

00:23:12.880 there's nothing

00:23:13.360 to be sad about.

00:23:15.140 So crying

00:23:15.680 would have looked

00:23:16.100 fake to me,

00:23:18.380 honestly.

00:23:18.960 If he had cried,

00:23:20.060 I'm not sure

00:23:20.600 I would have bought

00:23:21.140 that.

00:23:22.080 But being shook

00:23:23.140 to the core,

00:23:24.880 yeah,

00:23:25.160 that's human.

00:23:26.360 That's human.

00:23:28.020 All right.

00:23:29.660 Follow the money.

00:23:31.080 So that's what

00:23:31.560 this is about.

00:23:32.200 Have I told you

00:23:32.780 many times

00:23:33.440 that even when

00:23:34.760 people are not

00:23:35.460 consciously doing

00:23:36.500 something for the

00:23:37.260 money,

00:23:38.520 and even if they

00:23:39.780 could pass a lie

00:23:40.680 detector test,

00:23:41.920 you put somebody

00:23:42.520 in the lie detector

00:23:43.320 and say,

00:23:43.660 are you doing

00:23:44.060 this for the money?

00:23:45.400 And they say,

00:23:46.140 no, I'm doing

00:23:46.640 this because this

00:23:47.520 is the right thing

00:23:48.120 to do.

00:23:49.440 And they pass

00:23:50.300 the lie detector

00:23:51.000 test.

00:23:52.700 It's still

00:23:53.300 about the money.

00:23:53.860 Because people

00:23:55.820 will always

00:23:56.580 rationalize,

00:23:57.720 and even to

00:23:58.780 themselves,

00:23:59.760 they'll convince

00:24:00.380 themselves it's

00:24:01.200 not about the

00:24:01.760 money,

00:24:02.060 and they'll

00:24:02.380 really believe

00:24:02.860 it.

00:24:03.820 So if you

00:24:04.500 ask people,

00:24:05.740 no matter how

00:24:06.480 credible they

00:24:07.200 are,

00:24:07.600 no matter how

00:24:08.240 much you

00:24:08.540 believe them,

00:24:09.020 and they say,

00:24:09.560 no, it's not

00:24:10.180 about the money,

00:24:12.000 you can predict

00:24:13.600 where things will

00:24:15.080 go by following

00:24:16.460 the money,

00:24:17.260 even when it's

00:24:18.360 not about the

00:24:19.140 money.

00:24:19.400 So that's my

00:24:21.780 take.

00:24:22.860 Follow the money

00:24:23.640 always works when

00:24:24.640 people are doing

00:24:25.160 things for the

00:24:25.940 money, and they

00:24:26.820 tell you they are

00:24:27.480 if you could ask

00:24:28.540 them.

00:24:29.000 It always works

00:24:29.640 then.

00:24:30.480 But it also

00:24:31.340 works, and this

00:24:32.100 is the part I'm

00:24:32.660 adding to the

00:24:33.980 existing theory,

00:24:35.780 it also works

00:24:36.860 when nobody

00:24:37.780 involves,

00:24:38.700 believes,

00:24:40.080 honestly believes

00:24:40.820 that they're doing

00:24:41.300 anything for the

00:24:41.900 money.

00:24:42.580 It will still

00:24:43.660 go in the same

00:24:44.480 direction as the

00:24:45.620 money would

00:24:46.100 suggest.

00:24:46.900 So here's the

00:24:53.480 way the

00:24:54.240 Rittenhouse story

00:24:55.740 will go.

00:24:56.660 The way that

00:24:57.400 everybody can make

00:24:58.160 the most money

00:24:58.780 is he gets

00:25:01.000 acquitted, at

00:25:02.240 least of the

00:25:03.200 murderous charges,

00:25:04.700 gets acquitted,

00:25:05.380 there might be

00:25:05.780 some lesser

00:25:06.260 charge there.

00:25:08.580 And then

00:25:09.440 there are riots,

00:25:10.880 and then the

00:25:11.400 fake news industry

00:25:12.320 gets everybody

00:25:13.240 riled up, and

00:25:13.940 there's lots of

00:25:14.460 clicks, and

00:25:15.340 then everybody

00:25:15.820 gets money.

00:25:16.900 If you took

00:25:17.940 the CNN

00:25:18.540 analysts and

00:25:20.240 put them on a

00:25:20.900 lie detector,

00:25:21.520 let's imagine

00:25:22.080 that lie detectors

00:25:22.900 work.

00:25:23.800 In truth,

00:25:24.440 lie detectors

00:25:24.940 don't work.

00:25:25.780 You all knew

00:25:26.200 that, right?

00:25:27.380 Lie detectors

00:25:28.080 are fake

00:25:28.580 technology.

00:25:29.360 That's why

00:25:29.900 they're not

00:25:30.240 allowed in

00:25:30.980 courts, because

00:25:32.140 they don't

00:25:32.380 work.

00:25:33.280 But if people

00:25:33.880 think they

00:25:34.420 work, you

00:25:35.560 can learn

00:25:36.140 things, because

00:25:37.100 people will

00:25:37.580 act.

00:25:38.220 Anyway, there's

00:25:38.900 a longer story

00:25:39.440 about that.

00:25:40.120 But imagine

00:25:40.660 hypothetically that

00:25:42.860 there was such

00:25:43.380 a thing as a

00:25:44.220 lie detector that

00:25:44.980 actually worked,

00:25:45.660 reliably.

00:25:47.600 I'll bet you

00:25:48.160 could put all

00:25:48.660 the CNN

00:25:49.100 staff on it

00:25:49.940 and say,

00:25:50.460 are you doing

00:25:51.020 this for the

00:25:51.540 money?

00:25:53.120 This is really

00:25:53.820 about the

00:25:54.140 money, isn't

00:25:54.620 it?

00:25:55.420 I'll bet every

00:25:56.040 one of them

00:25:56.400 would pass the

00:25:57.060 lie detector.

00:25:58.240 No, it's not

00:25:58.740 about the

00:25:59.060 money.

00:25:59.640 I wouldn't do

00:26:00.080 that.

00:26:00.840 It's about

00:26:01.200 the news.

00:26:04.500 But the

00:26:05.020 predictor says

00:26:06.420 follow the

00:26:06.880 money.

00:26:07.720 So it's

00:26:08.320 definitely going

00:26:08.800 to go to

00:26:09.140 acquittal, because

00:26:09.780 that's where

00:26:10.100 they get the

00:26:10.520 most money,

00:26:11.080 because that

00:26:11.340 would be the

00:26:11.660 most outrage.

00:26:12.160 And so

00:26:14.860 here's more

00:26:15.480 on that.

00:26:16.180 So CNN was

00:26:17.300 trying to make

00:26:17.880 a story out

00:26:18.600 of the judge,

00:26:20.100 which now

00:26:20.660 they're going

00:26:20.920 to paint the

00:26:21.380 judge as a

00:26:21.880 white supremacist.

00:26:23.700 And there's no

00:26:24.560 evidence of that

00:26:25.240 either, right?

00:26:25.820 Of course.

00:26:26.680 But they're going

00:26:27.140 to make him look

00:26:27.660 like he's part

00:26:28.620 of the problem.

00:26:29.780 And I guess he

00:26:30.420 made a joke

00:26:30.960 about the Asian

00:26:32.280 food might be

00:26:33.320 delayed because

00:26:34.080 of the supply

00:26:34.680 chain problem.

00:26:36.200 And he was

00:26:37.720 obviously making

00:26:38.440 a joke.

00:26:38.880 And CNN is

00:26:41.720 saying that some

00:26:42.720 Asians were

00:26:43.360 offended by that

00:26:44.380 because it

00:26:45.780 makes it seem

00:26:46.360 as if the

00:26:46.960 supply chain

00:26:47.580 problem is the 0.97

00:26:48.380 fault of Asians. 0.96

00:26:52.560 What? 0.91

00:26:54.880 What?

00:26:57.880 I'm pretty sure

00:26:58.880 there's such a

00:26:59.520 thing as Chinese

00:27:00.880 food.

00:27:02.260 Now, he said

00:27:02.820 Asian food because

00:27:03.760 maybe it wasn't

00:27:04.360 all Chinese.

00:27:05.780 It could have

00:27:06.160 been Vietnamese

00:27:07.320 or whatever.

00:27:07.880 but if you

00:27:12.580 say a joke

00:27:13.520 about maybe

00:27:14.140 your food

00:27:14.640 didn't come

00:27:15.220 because of

00:27:15.700 the supply

00:27:16.180 chain problem,

00:27:17.980 that's saying

00:27:18.920 that the people

00:27:19.580 who make

00:27:20.680 the Asian

00:27:21.500 food are

00:27:23.000 victims of

00:27:24.160 the supply

00:27:24.700 chain.

00:27:26.760 He's saying

00:27:27.740 that the

00:27:28.900 Asians, like 1.00

00:27:29.900 all the rest

00:27:30.500 of us,

00:27:31.760 might be

00:27:32.520 victims of

00:27:34.140 the supply

00:27:34.620 chain problem.

00:27:35.960 There's literally 0.98

00:27:36.740 no fucking 0.98

00:27:37.580 thing here 1.00

00:27:38.200 about them

00:27:38.720 causing the

00:27:39.520 supply chain

00:27:40.160 problem.

00:27:42.120 Oh, my God.

00:27:44.020 There's literally

00:27:44.840 nothing here.

00:27:46.800 Now, there were

00:27:47.340 some activists in

00:27:48.460 the Asian

00:27:49.480 community who

00:27:50.260 made a thing

00:27:50.920 of it, but I

00:27:52.460 don't think that

00:27:53.000 needed to be

00:27:53.620 reported because

00:27:54.660 activists will

00:27:55.440 take any

00:27:56.380 reason to

00:27:57.500 connect to the

00:27:58.200 headlines to

00:27:58.920 make their

00:27:59.320 case.

00:27:59.620 So I don't

00:28:00.840 think you

00:28:01.120 can listen to

00:28:01.580 the activists

00:28:02.160 in a story

00:28:02.640 like this.

00:28:03.460 But really,

00:28:04.000 CNN, do a

00:28:04.900 little bit of

00:28:05.700 filtering.

00:28:08.120 A little bit

00:28:08.660 of filtering.

00:28:10.740 That blows

00:28:11.640 my mind.

00:28:14.120 And then

00:28:14.480 here's another,

00:28:16.360 this headline

00:28:17.100 is on Twitter.

00:28:18.040 You know,

00:28:18.220 Twitter puts

00:28:18.740 their own

00:28:19.360 little, they

00:28:20.740 call out

00:28:21.300 different stories

00:28:22.180 on the right

00:28:22.920 hand side of

00:28:24.180 the web

00:28:24.760 browser version.

00:28:26.220 And here's

00:28:26.900 what they said

00:28:27.440 today.

00:28:27.780 Overwhelmingly

00:28:28.960 white juries

00:28:29.640 will decide

00:28:30.340 both the

00:28:30.900 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:28:31.600 and Ahmoud

00:28:32.400 Arbery cases.

00:28:34.480 The system

00:28:35.200 is imperfect,

00:28:36.200 legal experts

00:28:36.840 say.

00:28:38.700 Now, do you

00:28:39.620 see what

00:28:39.900 they're doing

00:28:40.220 here?

00:28:41.280 They're making

00:28:42.120 you try to

00:28:42.840 think that the

00:28:43.620 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:28:44.300 case and the

00:28:44.960 Ahmoud Arbery

00:28:45.880 case are

00:28:47.440 equivalents.

00:28:49.060 Right?

00:28:49.540 They don't say

00:28:50.080 it, but that's

00:28:51.320 the clear

00:28:51.940 suggestion that

00:28:52.920 these two

00:28:53.380 cases have

00:28:53.960 something in

00:28:54.500 common.

00:28:55.520 And they

00:28:55.880 don't.

00:28:56.820 They really

00:28:57.320 don't.

00:28:58.740 Now, why

00:29:00.680 do you

00:29:01.480 imagine that

00:29:02.320 overwhelmingly

00:29:03.240 white juries

00:29:04.120 are the

00:29:05.040 ones that

00:29:05.380 got picked

00:29:05.780 in both

00:29:06.280 cases?

00:29:07.760 Why do you

00:29:09.920 think that

00:29:10.260 is?

00:29:11.460 I don't

00:29:11.920 know.

00:29:13.540 I don't

00:29:13.860 know.

00:29:14.740 But

00:29:14.920 certainly

00:29:17.500 both the

00:29:18.640 alternative,

00:29:19.420 don't all

00:29:20.000 the attorneys

00:29:20.800 have the

00:29:21.180 same amount

00:29:21.700 of challenges?

00:29:23.200 Am I

00:29:23.560 wrong?

00:29:24.700 Don't you

00:29:25.060 have exactly

00:29:25.600 the same

00:29:26.080 amount of

00:29:26.460 challenges if

00:29:27.220 you're the

00:29:27.460 prosecution or

00:29:28.340 the defense?

00:29:29.920 So the

00:29:30.640 jury is

00:29:31.220 whatever the

00:29:31.800 jury is.

00:29:32.500 I mean,

00:29:32.700 it's not

00:29:33.000 because they

00:29:33.960 picked it that

00:29:34.480 way.

00:29:35.580 I mean,

00:29:35.940 they might

00:29:36.200 try, but

00:29:36.940 there's a

00:29:37.440 limit to how

00:29:37.860 much they

00:29:38.200 can game

00:29:39.220 that system.

00:29:40.860 So, of

00:29:41.440 course, just

00:29:41.840 framing the

00:29:42.480 story in this

00:29:43.080 way.

00:29:43.560 And by the

00:29:43.900 way, I think

00:29:44.300 this is a

00:29:44.760 good question.

00:29:46.160 Don't you?

00:29:47.180 It's a perfectly

00:29:47.840 good question.

00:29:48.480 I think you

00:29:49.980 should be

00:29:50.880 asking questions

00:29:51.660 about the

00:29:52.260 racial

00:29:54.160 composition of

00:29:55.900 your juries.

00:29:56.980 So there's

00:29:57.380 nothing wrong

00:29:57.820 with the

00:29:58.040 question, and

00:29:59.080 I don't think

00:29:59.480 we should

00:29:59.820 ever take

00:30:00.240 our eye

00:30:00.620 off of

00:30:01.040 that.

00:30:01.600 It's

00:30:01.840 useful.

00:30:02.800 We should

00:30:03.020 keep an

00:30:03.560 eye on it.

00:30:04.220 But it

00:30:04.560 shouldn't be

00:30:04.900 the one

00:30:05.780 factor, right?

00:30:07.480 It shouldn't

00:30:07.780 be the one

00:30:08.200 factor.

00:30:09.160 And when

00:30:09.720 you frame

00:30:10.220 the story

00:30:10.640 like this,

00:30:11.220 you're just

00:30:11.560 playing to

00:30:13.120 the narrative

00:30:13.600 that this

00:30:14.160 is a racial 0.93

00:30:15.200 thing in

00:30:15.920 which it

00:30:16.420 wasn't.

00:30:16.960 All right.

00:30:23.800 Apparently,

00:30:24.580 some

00:30:25.060 progressives

00:30:26.160 are just

00:30:26.800 learning that

00:30:28.820 Kyle's victims

00:30:30.260 were not

00:30:30.820 black.

00:30:32.000 Because there's 0.91

00:30:32.520 some tweets

00:30:33.100 where people

00:30:33.700 are saying,

00:30:34.100 wait a minute,

00:30:34.480 wait a minute,

00:30:35.440 this whole time

00:30:36.260 you're telling

00:30:36.620 me that he

00:30:37.280 didn't shoot 1.00

00:30:37.740 black people? 0.99

00:30:39.200 That's actually 0.93

00:30:40.180 what a number

00:30:41.360 of people in

00:30:42.100 the left

00:30:43.600 community believe.

00:30:45.380 They've watched

00:30:45.900 this story all

00:30:46.880 these months

00:30:47.600 and months

00:30:48.180 and they

00:30:49.340 thought the

00:30:49.740 victims were 0.51

00:30:50.460 black. 0.94

00:30:52.140 Sorry, 0.83

00:30:53.000 I said

00:30:53.420 victims,

00:30:53.960 didn't I?

00:30:54.760 Good catch.

00:30:56.320 That's a good

00:30:56.780 catch.

00:30:57.960 The victim

00:30:58.580 was Kyle.

00:31:01.640 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:31:02.600 was the only

00:31:03.140 victim in the

00:31:03.740 story.

00:31:04.520 The others

00:31:05.000 were people

00:31:05.540 who had

00:31:06.180 bad things

00:31:06.680 happen to

00:31:07.100 him.

00:31:08.420 But the

00:31:09.180 victim of

00:31:09.820 the crime

00:31:10.220 was Kyle

00:31:10.740 Rittenhouse.

00:31:11.340 Thank you

00:31:11.880 for that

00:31:12.120 correction.

00:31:12.620 That is a

00:31:13.180 good correction.

00:31:14.740 So apparently

00:31:15.200 progressives are

00:31:15.960 just learning

00:31:16.720 that their

00:31:17.440 bubble is

00:31:18.580 not getting

00:31:18.980 real news.

00:31:20.540 I saw some

00:31:21.140 compilations of

00:31:22.120 tweets of that

00:31:23.240 nature.

00:31:24.740 And so I

00:31:25.560 tweeted that

00:31:26.460 and I said

00:31:27.180 to progressives,

00:31:29.020 after you find

00:31:30.020 out that you've

00:31:31.100 been lied to

00:31:32.200 about Kyle

00:31:33.400 Rittenhouse,

00:31:34.680 go Google

00:31:35.640 this phrase,

00:31:37.160 fine people

00:31:37.780 hoax,

00:31:39.180 the fine

00:31:39.740 people hoax,

00:31:40.740 do it first

00:31:41.560 on Duck

00:31:42.040 Duck

00:31:42.300 Go and

00:31:43.620 then do

00:31:43.960 the same

00:31:44.400 search on

00:31:44.900 Google and

00:31:46.340 compare them.

00:31:47.840 And then I

00:31:48.380 advised them

00:31:49.600 to wear a

00:31:50.120 hat because

00:31:51.460 their head is

00:31:52.340 going to come 0.99

00:31:52.820 right off.

00:31:55.560 Now, I was

00:31:56.700 asked, why is

00:31:58.060 it that I keep

00:31:59.280 going back to

00:32:00.040 this fine

00:32:00.520 people hoax?

00:32:01.180 Like, why am I

00:32:01.740 so obsessed with

00:32:03.460 this above all

00:32:04.320 other things?

00:32:05.300 And the answer

00:32:06.040 is, it's the

00:32:06.820 tentpole hoax.

00:32:08.880 Do you know

00:32:09.220 what a tentpole

00:32:10.100 refers to?

00:32:11.280 So the tentpole

00:32:12.160 is the biggest

00:32:13.120 pole that's

00:32:14.340 the most

00:32:14.680 important one

00:32:15.300 holding up a

00:32:15.920 tent, let's

00:32:16.580 say a circus

00:32:17.120 tent situation.

00:32:18.700 If you can

00:32:19.420 take the tentpole

00:32:20.260 out, it doesn't

00:32:21.600 matter how many

00:32:22.260 other smaller

00:32:22.860 poles there are,

00:32:23.760 the tent's

00:32:24.160 going to

00:32:24.400 collapse.

00:32:26.000 So on the

00:32:27.460 fine people

00:32:28.120 hoax, I've

00:32:29.000 been using the

00:32:29.780 Andre Agassi

00:32:30.820 strategy.

00:32:32.860 Now, Andre

00:32:33.440 Agassi had a

00:32:34.200 strategy playing

00:32:35.060 players who

00:32:36.780 usually were

00:32:37.560 lesser players,

00:32:38.580 but sometimes

00:32:39.180 not so much.

00:32:40.860 And usually

00:32:41.300 everybody you

00:32:41.980 play has at

00:32:42.620 least one

00:32:43.020 strength, but

00:32:44.720 they might have

00:32:45.300 also at least

00:32:46.140 one weakness.

00:32:47.080 Let's say the

00:32:47.620 backhand is a

00:32:48.320 weakness and the

00:32:49.300 forehand is a

00:32:50.000 strength.

00:32:51.160 Almost every

00:32:52.120 tennis player

00:32:53.040 would try to

00:32:54.080 hit more balls

00:32:54.880 to their 0.80

00:32:55.260 opponent's

00:32:55.760 weakness,

00:32:56.880 because obviously

00:32:57.560 that's where

00:32:57.980 you're going to

00:32:58.300 get your

00:32:58.580 points.

00:32:59.540 You hit to

00:32:59.960 their weakness,

00:33:00.520 not to their

00:33:00.960 strength.

00:33:02.240 Andre

00:33:02.540 Agassi did

00:33:03.160 the opposite.

00:33:04.680 Probably not

00:33:05.400 every time, but

00:33:06.020 one of his big

00:33:07.120 strategies was he

00:33:08.540 would go after

00:33:09.160 their strength.

00:33:11.060 Do you know

00:33:11.640 why?

00:33:13.180 Because their

00:33:13.860 best shot is

00:33:15.800 their tent

00:33:16.280 pole.

00:33:17.720 If he goes to

00:33:19.180 their tent 0.98

00:33:19.600 pole shot, let's 0.84

00:33:20.420 say it's the

00:33:20.840 forehand, they've

00:33:21.500 got a blistering

00:33:22.220 forehand, and

00:33:23.240 they hit a

00:33:23.760 blistering

00:33:24.300 forehand, what

00:33:26.540 happens to the

00:33:27.380 confidence of both

00:33:28.360 of you?

00:33:30.000 Not much

00:33:30.780 change.

00:33:31.740 Not much

00:33:32.260 change.

00:33:32.820 Because you

00:33:33.340 expected the

00:33:34.460 person to have

00:33:34.980 that blazing

00:33:35.520 forehand, you

00:33:36.920 expected him to

00:33:37.740 make some

00:33:38.080 points off it,

00:33:38.680 and that's

00:33:38.920 what happened.

00:33:39.760 So your

00:33:40.140 expectations were

00:33:41.180 just about where

00:33:41.820 they belonged.

00:33:42.900 But what if

00:33:45.180 Andre

00:33:46.460 Agassi can win

00:33:48.060 two points?

00:33:53.440 Well, then you

00:33:55.040 think, oh, 0.98

00:33:56.020 crap, my best 0.99

00:33:57.980 weapon doesn't 1.00

00:33:58.640 work against

00:33:59.220 Andre

00:33:59.560 Agassi.

00:34:00.500 And it could

00:34:01.000 be he just

00:34:01.480 got lucky.

00:34:02.600 It could be he

00:34:03.260 just had two

00:34:04.140 points that the

00:34:05.500 bounce went his

00:34:06.160 way.

00:34:07.200 But in two

00:34:08.520 points, he can

00:34:09.980 destroy a player

00:34:11.400 completely.

00:34:13.780 Two points.

00:34:16.020 That's the

00:34:16.620 strategy.

00:34:17.800 Now, you have to

00:34:18.300 be as good as

00:34:18.860 him to be able to

00:34:19.580 pull that off, but

00:34:20.660 the risk-reward is

00:34:22.320 really good.

00:34:23.620 If you can take

00:34:24.300 out the tent

00:34:24.880 pole, you win,

00:34:27.020 and the rest is

00:34:27.680 just the details.

00:34:28.820 Because once their

00:34:29.360 confidence is gone,

00:34:30.340 you just dismantle

00:34:31.260 them.

00:34:32.080 So the find

00:34:33.140 people hoax is

00:34:33.920 the one that

00:34:34.280 makes all the

00:34:35.040 lesser hoaxes

00:34:35.960 believable.

00:34:37.840 You see that,

00:34:38.600 right?

00:34:39.140 If you were on

00:34:40.200 the left and

00:34:40.920 you believed the

00:34:41.740 find people hoax,

00:34:42.660 you believed it

00:34:43.200 actually happened,

00:34:44.260 it would be easy

00:34:45.440 to believe that

00:34:46.780 all of the

00:34:47.400 smaller suggestions

00:34:48.520 of racist-like

00:34:50.340 things could have

00:34:51.200 also been true.

00:34:51.900 But if the tent

00:34:53.700 pole is removed

00:34:54.600 and you find out

00:34:55.740 that the press

00:34:56.560 had lied to you

00:34:57.440 about something

00:34:58.520 really important

00:34:59.660 and really basic,

00:35:01.740 you're going to

00:35:02.820 question all the

00:35:03.720 rest.

00:35:04.100 So this is an

00:35:06.740 Andre Agassi

00:35:07.480 play.

00:35:08.180 I don't know

00:35:08.920 that I can take

00:35:09.540 the tent pole

00:35:10.180 out, but when

00:35:11.460 I saw people

00:35:12.220 start to

00:35:13.820 abandon ship

00:35:15.960 over the

00:35:17.000 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:35:17.840 thing, I saw

00:35:19.120 an opening.

00:35:20.620 And if I can

00:35:21.480 make the

00:35:21.880 Kyle Rittenhouse

00:35:22.660 story, connect

00:35:24.600 it to the

00:35:25.040 find people

00:35:25.580 hoax, and get

00:35:26.720 people to just

00:35:27.820 Google the two

00:35:28.620 sources, DuckDuckGo

00:35:29.840 and Google, and

00:35:31.220 see that they're

00:35:31.740 completely

00:35:32.400 different, one

00:35:34.740 says it's a

00:35:35.300 hoax and one

00:35:35.840 says it's real.

00:35:39.560 I'm pretty

00:35:40.200 close to the

00:35:40.820 tent pole.

00:35:42.540 Now, if you

00:35:42.920 also noticed, if

00:35:43.960 some of you have

00:35:44.560 been watching me

00:35:45.140 now for years,

00:35:46.340 actually, going

00:35:47.420 after every

00:35:48.060 suggestion about

00:35:48.960 the find people

00:35:49.660 hoax, you know,

00:35:50.400 I go after it

00:35:51.160 pretty hard on

00:35:51.660 Twitter.

00:35:52.600 And have you

00:35:52.940 noticed that the

00:35:53.960 replies have

00:35:56.400 changed a lot

00:35:57.820 since the

00:35:58.800 beginning?

00:35:59.740 Remember in

00:36:00.260 the beginning,

00:36:00.820 I'd say it's

00:36:01.360 a hoax, and I

00:36:02.120 would just get

00:36:02.600 slammed by

00:36:04.180 people saying,

00:36:04.920 God, it

00:36:05.240 wasn't a

00:36:05.680 hoax, we

00:36:06.140 saw it with

00:36:06.620 our own eyes,

00:36:07.420 heard it with

00:36:07.780 our own ears.

00:36:09.120 Now, I still

00:36:09.900 get that.

00:36:11.260 I still get

00:36:11.920 that, but one

00:36:13.760 or two, right?

00:36:15.580 And they get

00:36:16.320 slammed by the

00:36:17.360 other commenters

00:36:18.200 who just show

00:36:18.760 them the

00:36:19.000 transcript and 0.98

00:36:19.860 slap them down 0.88

00:36:20.760 pretty hard. 0.75

00:36:22.140 So, at this

00:36:23.520 point, that

00:36:25.240 find people

00:36:26.040 hoax tent pole

00:36:27.160 is in jeopardy.

00:36:28.580 I'm not going

00:36:29.300 to predict it

00:36:29.840 will come

00:36:30.100 down, but

00:36:31.340 this is the

00:36:31.840 closest it's

00:36:32.560 been to being

00:36:33.220 wobbly, and

00:36:34.400 it is what I'm

00:36:35.020 going for.

00:36:35.760 Because I don't

00:36:36.240 think I can

00:36:36.680 make any

00:36:37.120 progress chipping

00:36:38.560 away at the

00:36:39.280 lesser poles.

00:36:41.880 I'm going for

00:36:42.480 the tent pole.

00:36:43.660 If I take out

00:36:44.580 the tent pole,

00:36:45.260 it's all over.

00:36:47.100 So that's the

00:36:47.720 strategy.

00:36:49.420 All right,

00:36:49.900 Biden's got some

00:36:50.980 fake news about

00:36:51.760 him.

00:36:52.300 He was talking

00:36:52.740 about Satchel

00:36:53.440 Page, who had

00:36:55.060 been a member

00:36:56.120 of what was

00:36:57.600 called in

00:36:58.160 its day the

00:36:59.260 Negro League 0.72

00:37:00.320 for baseball.

00:37:01.480 Now, that's

00:37:01.980 what it was

00:37:02.400 called in

00:37:02.960 its day.

00:37:04.380 So, in

00:37:04.960 its day, it

00:37:05.560 wasn't considered

00:37:06.220 an insult

00:37:06.780 because the

00:37:08.160 folks who

00:37:08.940 were on

00:37:09.340 the team

00:37:09.780 used the

00:37:10.740 same language.

00:37:11.640 It didn't

00:37:11.840 mean anything

00:37:12.300 back then.

00:37:13.820 So, when

00:37:14.300 Biden was

00:37:14.860 making reference

00:37:15.680 to Satchel

00:37:16.660 Page, he

00:37:18.200 said he

00:37:21.860 was a great

00:37:22.560 Negro player

00:37:23.600 player, and

00:37:25.120 that he

00:37:25.600 clarified that

00:37:27.260 he was

00:37:27.460 talking about 0.60

00:37:27.900 the Negro

00:37:28.920 League, and

00:37:30.280 that he was

00:37:30.560 a player in

00:37:31.060 that league.

00:37:32.120 Now, of

00:37:32.800 course, the

00:37:33.380 right took

00:37:35.760 that out of

00:37:36.400 context

00:37:36.940 immediately and

00:37:38.080 says, hey,

00:37:39.680 he's calling 0.96

00:37:40.680 black people 0.99

00:37:41.340 Negroes, and 0.99

00:37:42.280 therefore he's 0.99

00:37:42.820 really a racist.

00:37:44.920 Now, do you

00:37:46.100 think there's

00:37:46.520 even one

00:37:47.280 person on

00:37:48.780 the right who

00:37:50.340 actually believes

00:37:51.300 that this is

00:37:51.860 some kind of

00:37:52.280 racist talk?

00:37:55.680 I don't think

00:37:56.440 so.

00:37:56.800 I don't think

00:37:57.400 there's even

00:37:57.740 one person

00:37:58.280 who thinks

00:37:58.680 this is

00:37:59.040 racist, but

00:38:00.180 I think the

00:38:02.360 right is

00:38:02.720 having fun

00:38:03.240 with it,

00:38:04.160 because it's

00:38:04.720 so similar

00:38:05.380 to what the

00:38:05.920 left does

00:38:06.400 to the

00:38:06.680 right.

00:38:07.520 So I

00:38:07.820 think people

00:38:08.260 are pretending

00:38:09.060 as if

00:38:09.700 they're,

00:38:10.380 you know,

00:38:10.920 gotcha,

00:38:11.940 because it's

00:38:12.880 the same

00:38:13.220 game that's

00:38:13.840 played in

00:38:14.220 the other

00:38:14.460 direction.

00:38:15.240 So I

00:38:15.460 think it's

00:38:16.520 fair, it's

00:38:17.520 sort of fair

00:38:18.000 game, you

00:38:18.720 could argue,

00:38:19.600 to take this

00:38:20.460 out of context

00:38:21.180 just to make

00:38:21.840 the point.

00:38:23.200 But correct

00:38:24.300 me if I'm

00:38:24.740 wrong, there's

00:38:25.420 no conservative

00:38:26.120 who thinks

00:38:26.660 this is racist, 0.68

00:38:27.460 right?

00:38:28.520 He just was

00:38:29.420 referring to

00:38:30.020 a historical

00:38:30.780 language.

00:38:34.480 Yeah.

00:38:35.340 Alinsky says

00:38:36.080 make them

00:38:36.460 live by their

00:38:36.980 own rules.

00:38:37.660 Yeah, it's a

00:38:37.980 good strategy.

00:38:39.120 It's a good

00:38:39.560 strategy to

00:38:40.300 attack it like

00:38:41.040 it was as

00:38:42.460 if it were

00:38:42.920 true, but

00:38:43.540 it's very

00:38:43.980 much not

00:38:44.400 true.

00:38:45.820 All right.

00:38:48.340 This is a

00:38:49.120 story from

00:38:49.560 the AP.

00:38:50.080 And here's

00:38:52.020 a story that

00:38:52.580 you'd have to

00:38:53.040 be deep in

00:38:53.660 the bubble of

00:38:54.800 news bubble to

00:38:57.220 read this

00:38:57.860 story and not

00:38:58.940 have the

00:39:00.060 reaction that

00:39:00.680 most of you

00:39:01.260 are going to

00:39:01.540 have.

00:39:02.280 All right,

00:39:02.560 listen to

00:39:02.920 this.

00:39:03.160 This is

00:39:03.380 actually a

00:39:03.800 quote from

00:39:04.260 an AP story

00:39:04.960 today.

00:39:05.680 This is

00:39:06.080 mind-boggling.

00:39:06.740 It says

00:39:07.980 one of the

00:39:08.440 nation's two

00:39:09.180 major political

00:39:10.020 parties appears

00:39:11.280 increasingly

00:39:12.000 tolerant of

00:39:13.280 at least some

00:39:14.160 persistent level

00:39:15.140 of violence in

00:39:16.060 American discourse

00:39:17.060 or at least

00:39:18.300 willing to turn

00:39:19.100 a blind eye to

00:39:19.900 it.

00:39:20.780 Which party are

00:39:21.660 they talking

00:39:22.040 about?

00:39:23.920 Is that a

00:39:24.880 reference to

00:39:26.000 Democrats or

00:39:26.940 Republicans?

00:39:28.700 Because it's

00:39:29.480 one party.

00:39:30.120 They say one

00:39:30.620 party.

00:39:31.840 Let me read it

00:39:32.580 again and you

00:39:33.940 tell me this is

00:39:34.700 Democrats or

00:39:35.520 Republicans.

00:39:35.940 one of the

00:39:37.000 nation's two

00:39:37.660 political parties

00:39:38.600 appear increasingly

00:39:40.280 tolerant or at

00:39:41.380 least to at

00:39:42.560 least some

00:39:42.960 persistent level

00:39:43.780 of violence in

00:39:44.380 American discourse

00:39:45.000 or at least

00:39:45.500 willing to turn

00:39:46.040 a blind eye to

00:39:46.640 it.

00:39:48.520 This is written

00:39:49.560 as if anybody

00:39:51.340 can see.

00:39:52.820 It's obviously

00:39:53.320 we're talking

00:39:53.840 about the

00:39:54.180 Republicans and

00:39:55.100 January 6th and

00:39:57.380 you know and

00:39:58.020 related conversation

00:39:58.980 I suppose.

00:40:00.560 Now how could

00:40:02.420 you be blind to

00:40:03.360 the fact that

00:40:04.100 the entire left

00:40:05.000 has been

00:40:05.640 cheering on

00:40:06.280 riots for

00:40:07.060 years and

00:40:09.280 that even

00:40:09.820 political

00:40:10.340 members like

00:40:11.440 Maxine Waters

00:40:13.860 is saying you

00:40:15.300 should go harass 0.77

00:40:16.260 people in

00:40:17.500 public.

00:40:18.940 Harass

00:40:19.340 politicians in

00:40:20.080 public.

00:40:20.880 And even

00:40:21.800 Chris Cuomo

00:40:22.780 saying that

00:40:25.080 who said

00:40:26.080 riots need to

00:40:26.740 be peaceful.

00:40:27.940 How in the

00:40:28.600 world could

00:40:30.220 your readers 1.00

00:40:30.760 be so dumb 1.00

00:40:31.700 as to think 1.00

00:40:33.200 that it's the

00:40:34.060 conservatives who

00:40:35.040 are tolerating a

00:40:36.200 little bit of

00:40:36.900 violence?

00:40:38.000 How could they

00:40:38.480 possibly think

00:40:39.320 that?

00:40:40.060 Like you would

00:40:40.440 have to be so

00:40:41.100 deep in the

00:40:41.660 bubble that it's

00:40:44.920 just shocking that

00:40:46.100 that's even a

00:40:46.620 thing.

00:40:47.380 Anyway, here's a

00:40:51.920 persuasion tip.

00:40:53.260 trying to change

00:40:55.520 somebody's mind

00:40:56.200 directly almost

00:40:57.520 never works.

00:40:58.580 So if somebody

00:40:59.060 says X is 0.90

00:40:59.920 true, you say

00:41:01.080 no it's not,

00:41:02.280 and even if you

00:41:02.920 show all your

00:41:03.420 sources, it

00:41:04.740 doesn't matter.

00:41:05.820 You're not going

00:41:06.380 to convince anybody

00:41:07.060 of anything most

00:41:07.840 of the time.

00:41:08.840 But sometimes

00:41:10.060 you can trick

00:41:10.960 people into

00:41:11.540 discovering the

00:41:12.280 first clue on

00:41:13.200 their own.

00:41:14.560 And if they

00:41:15.000 find it on

00:41:15.580 their own, then

00:41:16.740 they can change.

00:41:18.280 So here's a

00:41:19.500 persuasion tip.

00:41:20.840 Don't just say

00:41:21.740 you're wrong. 0.83

00:41:23.140 Give them some

00:41:24.100 breadcrumbs.

00:41:25.700 And see if they

00:41:26.560 can find the

00:41:27.160 path there.

00:41:28.000 So you notice I

00:41:28.620 said do search

00:41:30.440 on DuckDuckGo

00:41:31.680 and then search

00:41:32.900 on Google?

00:41:33.900 Because if I told

00:41:34.920 them what was

00:41:35.440 there, it wouldn't

00:41:35.980 work at all.

00:41:37.500 They have to have

00:41:38.140 the feeling that

00:41:39.400 they found it

00:41:39.980 out on their own.

00:41:41.420 So I'm giving

00:41:42.160 them the opportunity

00:41:43.040 to generate a

00:41:44.500 feeling that they

00:41:45.880 learned it on

00:41:46.780 their own by

00:41:47.380 searching for it.

00:41:48.860 That's your

00:41:49.460 persuasion tip of

00:41:50.260 the day.

00:41:52.800 I made a claim

00:41:53.860 yesterday, which

00:41:54.540 I'm going to

00:41:54.960 stick to, that

00:41:56.180 is one of my

00:41:57.840 books, How to

00:41:58.780 Fail at Almost

00:41:59.240 Everything and

00:41:59.720 Still Win Big, is

00:42:01.260 the most influential

00:42:02.260 book in America

00:42:03.180 right now.

00:42:06.620 True or false?

00:42:08.860 And by the way,

00:42:09.740 I'm not, this is

00:42:10.820 not hyperbole.

00:42:11.700 This is my actual

00:42:12.580 honest opinion.

00:42:14.240 Based on all the

00:42:15.400 feedback I'm getting

00:42:16.220 and the influence I

00:42:17.160 can see on other

00:42:17.820 books, et cetera,

00:42:18.820 the most influential

00:42:20.160 book in the

00:42:20.740 country, I don't

00:42:22.100 know about other

00:42:22.600 countries, but in

00:42:23.400 this country, is my

00:42:24.760 book, How to Fail.

00:42:26.580 Because Systems Over

00:42:27.800 Goals has taken over.

00:42:30.140 I mean, pretty much

00:42:31.500 it's almost universally

00:42:32.700 understood.

00:42:34.840 The talent stack idea,

00:42:36.700 you see everywhere.

00:42:38.420 And the number of

00:42:39.240 people who have read

00:42:40.880 the book and changed

00:42:41.740 their lives is through

00:42:43.160 the roof at this point.

00:42:44.900 You know, if I asked you

00:42:45.740 in the comments how

00:42:46.740 many people read that

00:42:47.620 book and lost weight,

00:42:50.340 have anybody seen me

00:42:51.600 do that?

00:42:52.620 Let me do it here.

00:42:53.480 I'll just prove this.

00:42:54.600 I know the people on

00:42:55.400 Locals have seen this

00:42:56.860 before, but for the

00:42:57.900 people on YouTube, how

00:43:00.540 many people who read my

00:43:01.500 book, had to fail at

00:43:02.200 almost everything and

00:43:02.820 still win big, either had

00:43:05.540 a big win in business

00:43:08.000 economically or a big win

00:43:11.420 in fitness.

00:43:12.980 Big wins in fitness or

00:43:15.480 economics.

00:43:17.220 Now watch the comments.

00:43:20.560 It's a lot.

00:43:22.260 It's a lot.

00:43:23.840 Yeah.

00:43:24.340 I could read them to you.

00:43:25.680 It changed my life.

00:43:26.700 I lost weight.

00:43:28.280 Fitness, both.

00:43:29.860 Economics, yes.

00:43:31.120 Health.

00:43:32.480 Name one other book

00:43:33.340 that could do that.

00:43:34.760 I've never even heard

00:43:35.500 of it.

00:43:36.540 I've literally never heard

00:43:38.320 of any book that's done

00:43:39.780 this.

00:43:40.000 Have you?

00:43:40.280 Now, there are lots of

00:43:41.860 books that have great

00:43:42.820 stuff in them.

00:43:44.060 For example, back in the

00:43:46.220 day, there was, you know,

00:43:47.340 The Seven Habits of

00:43:48.420 Highly Successful People.

00:43:50.460 But that sort of aged

00:43:51.540 down.

00:43:52.220 You know, it was great.

00:43:53.540 Twelve Rules.

00:43:54.480 I would argue that my book

00:43:56.600 is far more influential

00:43:58.180 than The Twelve Rules, as

00:44:00.760 good as those are.

00:44:05.060 Now, somebody said to me,

00:44:06.900 Atomic Habits is sort of

00:44:08.920 based on my book.

00:44:11.200 Or at least part of it is.

00:44:12.660 And the author will tell you

00:44:16.140 that, by the way.

00:44:18.140 All right.

00:44:20.140 I actually feel bad for Scott.

00:44:22.180 Well, don't.

00:44:22.860 We'll make you go away.

00:44:28.040 All right.

00:44:28.520 So the reason I mention this

00:44:30.780 is, shouldn't it be taught

00:44:35.500 in schools?

00:44:37.620 I feel like something like

00:44:39.420 this should be taught in

00:44:40.340 schools because it's already

00:44:41.720 proven itself as directly

00:44:44.520 useful to everybody's life

00:44:46.220 in the most important ways.

00:44:49.260 I was asked to defend my

00:44:51.980 statement that it's the most

00:44:53.160 influential book in America

00:44:54.420 because somebody said,

00:44:56.580 No, I think that's the Bible,

00:44:57.960 Scott.

00:44:58.840 Duh.

00:44:59.920 I think the Bible has you

00:45:01.520 beat.

00:45:03.380 Does it?

00:45:05.580 Does the Bible have me beat?

00:45:07.860 Now, I'm not saying my book

00:45:09.360 is more important.

00:45:10.980 I didn't say that.

00:45:13.020 I'm saying it's more

00:45:13.880 influential.

00:45:14.380 Have you ever tried to

00:45:16.680 convince a Muslim 0.99

00:45:18.600 to change to Christianity 0.93

00:45:21.860 by giving them the Bible?

00:45:25.700 It works sometimes.

00:45:27.720 Sometimes.

00:45:28.860 But in general,

00:45:30.560 it's not going to change

00:45:31.460 your religion, is it?

00:45:33.800 And I would argue that

00:45:35.320 by the time you come

00:45:36.400 to the Bible,

00:45:37.120 most people are already

00:45:38.220 convinced.

00:45:38.940 You know, it's sort of

00:45:39.880 additional to it.

00:45:42.540 And I would say also

00:45:43.640 that the Bible is...

00:45:45.760 Do a fact check on this.

00:45:47.860 Isn't Christianity shrinking

00:45:49.840 in the United States?

00:45:52.600 Fact check me on that.

00:45:54.180 Is Christianity growing 1.00

00:45:55.600 or shrinking in the

00:45:57.320 United States?

00:45:58.340 I think it's shrinking,

00:45:59.820 right?

00:46:01.100 Shrinking a little bit?

00:46:03.200 And are my ideas

00:46:05.200 growing or shrinking?

00:46:08.360 They're growing.

00:46:08.840 Right?

00:46:11.140 So I'm just being provocative.

00:46:14.000 Nothing should be

00:46:14.740 compared to the Bible.

00:46:16.180 You know, there's some

00:46:16.680 things that nothing

00:46:17.260 should be compared to.

00:46:18.520 Don't compare anything

00:46:19.420 to, you know,

00:46:20.760 the Holocaust. 0.58

00:46:21.860 Don't compare anything

00:46:23.000 to Hitler. 0.68

00:46:24.120 Don't compare anything

00:46:25.180 to the Bible.

00:46:26.860 They're just...

00:46:27.560 They sort of stand alone.

00:46:28.980 So I'm just being

00:46:29.940 provocative when I say that.

00:46:31.540 But...

00:46:32.600 It is the most

00:46:35.660 influential book in America,

00:46:36.960 I believe,

00:46:37.480 at the moment.

00:46:37.960 There's a politician

00:46:41.620 who's trying to get

00:46:42.280 medical schools

00:46:43.180 to beef up their curriculums

00:46:45.460 for teaching nutrition

00:46:47.240 so that the medical professionals

00:46:49.780 could train their clients

00:46:52.180 in nutrition

00:46:52.820 and there would be,

00:46:53.960 you know,

00:46:54.220 gigantic benefits in health.

00:46:56.280 What do you think

00:46:56.860 of that idea?

00:46:57.740 What do you think

00:46:58.160 of the idea

00:46:58.740 of better training?

00:47:00.360 And it wouldn't be a law,

00:47:03.620 it would just be

00:47:04.060 some kind of recommendation,

00:47:05.220 I guess.

00:47:06.020 Do you think

00:47:06.560 that would be good?

00:47:07.560 To better train

00:47:09.060 doctors on nutrition.

00:47:14.500 I feel like

00:47:15.520 it's a total waste of time.

00:47:19.820 Correct me if I'm wrong.

00:47:21.840 Is there anybody

00:47:22.560 who doesn't know

00:47:23.360 how to eat right?

00:47:26.360 Really?

00:47:27.500 Because I don't know

00:47:28.380 anybody who's overweight

00:47:29.440 who doesn't know why.

00:47:32.480 They just look

00:47:33.300 at their plate.

00:47:34.700 Look at my plate.

00:47:35.760 Here's why.

00:47:37.540 It's right there.

00:47:38.860 Do you think

00:47:39.260 there's anybody

00:47:39.720 who doesn't know

00:47:40.540 you should eat less cake?

00:47:43.580 Maybe a little more sushi?

00:47:46.500 Something like that.

00:47:48.280 I don't know

00:47:49.060 that a doctor

00:47:49.660 is even the right person.

00:47:53.180 And do you have a doctor

00:47:54.900 if you went to the doctor

00:47:56.020 and you've got obviously

00:47:57.260 you have a weight issue

00:47:59.000 that would have an impact

00:48:01.220 on your health?

00:48:01.940 Do you have a doctor

00:48:02.700 who doesn't tell you

00:48:03.620 to lose weight?

00:48:05.440 And if they told you that

00:48:06.660 could you not figure out how?

00:48:10.180 Now again,

00:48:11.260 back to my book

00:48:11.900 How to Filled Almost Everything

00:48:13.000 and Still Went Big.

00:48:13.960 What I teach

00:48:14.720 is a system

00:48:15.540 for how to develop

00:48:18.140 your own system.

00:48:19.960 So in other words

00:48:20.620 it's how to figure out

00:48:22.860 the easiest way

00:48:23.680 to lose weight

00:48:24.320 and to learn about it,

00:48:25.380 et cetera.

00:48:25.620 So that's what I talk about.

00:48:27.080 I don't say

00:48:27.580 use a specific diet.

00:48:30.100 I say

00:48:30.660 your process

00:48:32.140 should be to learn

00:48:32.980 as much as you can

00:48:33.860 about diet choices

00:48:34.980 and what healthy things

00:48:37.180 taste good

00:48:37.780 and how to season them.

00:48:39.400 And basically

00:48:39.880 you use

00:48:40.580 knowledge

00:48:41.640 to substitute

00:48:43.220 for willpower.

00:48:45.400 Does that make sense?

00:48:46.960 I teach you

00:48:47.620 how to use knowledge

00:48:48.740 as a substitute

00:48:50.320 for willpower.

00:48:51.300 Does that make sense?

00:48:54.540 Let me give you

00:48:55.020 an example.

00:48:57.360 If you didn't know

00:48:58.540 how to make

00:48:59.180 food that was

00:49:01.680 good for you

00:49:02.520 also taste good

00:49:03.780 would you eat

00:49:05.320 much good food?

00:49:06.600 Probably not, right?

00:49:07.920 Because in the long term

00:49:08.740 you're going to go

00:49:09.220 for the flavor.

00:49:10.380 So if you didn't know

00:49:11.360 how you lacked

00:49:12.220 knowledge

00:49:12.820 on how to make

00:49:14.040 healthy food

00:49:16.160 taste good

00:49:16.780 then you would eat

00:49:18.820 the wrong food

00:49:19.440 over time.

00:49:20.620 But if you simply

00:49:21.460 had the knowledge

00:49:22.360 you would eat

00:49:24.460 more healthy food

00:49:25.220 and it would be

00:49:25.680 just as good

00:49:26.340 as the other stuff

00:49:27.060 because you knew

00:49:27.600 how to season it.

00:49:29.140 So I say that

00:49:30.300 you can use knowledge

00:49:31.560 as a substitute

00:49:32.920 for willpower.

00:49:34.920 And that most

00:49:35.560 diet plans

00:49:36.620 and even probably

00:49:37.600 what your doctor

00:49:38.200 would tell you

00:49:38.700 would be

00:49:39.480 willpower related

00:49:40.660 and those always fail.

00:49:42.860 Because

00:49:43.340 why do

00:49:44.280 willpower

00:49:45.060 diets

00:49:46.300 always fail?

00:49:46.940 Is there anything

00:49:49.180 I said already

00:49:49.940 today that would

00:49:50.720 tell you why?

00:49:53.080 Willpower

00:49:53.600 diets always fail

00:49:55.060 because they don't

00:49:56.180 take into account

00:49:57.020 human nature.

00:49:58.800 Human nature

00:49:59.560 just doesn't have

00:50:00.340 willpower.

00:50:01.800 Human nature

00:50:02.520 is you go after

00:50:03.360 the biggest attraction.

00:50:04.860 That's it.

00:50:05.900 If something is

00:50:06.580 more attractive

00:50:07.140 than something else

00:50:07.880 you go after it.

00:50:08.960 And you rationalize

00:50:10.080 it later.

00:50:10.540 But you don't have

00:50:10.920 any willpower.

00:50:12.900 Willpower is not

00:50:13.660 even a thing.

00:50:14.920 It's a complete

00:50:15.680 illusion.

00:50:16.940 Willpower is

00:50:18.140 sort of the result.

00:50:19.060 It's not

00:50:19.340 something you have.

00:50:22.240 So

00:50:22.640 if you simply

00:50:23.880 knew that

00:50:24.560 let's say

00:50:25.320 eating pasta

00:50:26.960 was a little

00:50:28.560 bit better for you

00:50:29.340 than eating

00:50:29.760 a white potato

00:50:30.620 and you like

00:50:32.200 them just as much

00:50:33.200 then the knowledge

00:50:34.520 that the pasta

00:50:35.340 doesn't spike

00:50:36.240 your glycemic index

00:50:37.680 as much as

00:50:38.280 the potato does.

00:50:39.440 If you just

00:50:40.000 had that knowledge

00:50:40.820 you could be

00:50:42.260 use no willpower

00:50:43.980 whatsoever

00:50:44.520 and just say

00:50:45.680 oh well

00:50:46.300 I like them

00:50:46.900 both the same

00:50:47.420 I'll have

00:50:47.740 the pasta.

00:50:49.380 Knowledge

00:50:49.820 is a complete

00:50:50.760 substitute

00:50:51.280 for willpower

00:50:51.940 also because

00:50:53.380 willpower

00:50:53.760 doesn't exist.

00:50:56.020 Alright

00:50:56.180 so I think

00:50:57.480 that instead

00:50:58.380 of having

00:50:58.980 doctors

00:50:59.740 tell people

00:51:02.360 about nutrition

00:51:03.020 which I think

00:51:03.760 would just be

00:51:04.380 redundant

00:51:04.780 with what people

00:51:05.560 already know

00:51:06.280 that my book

00:51:07.400 should be

00:51:07.920 required in

00:51:08.720 schools

00:51:09.120 because people

00:51:10.900 who read my book

00:51:11.700 lose weight

00:51:12.380 because they're

00:51:13.420 not using

00:51:13.880 willpower

00:51:14.320 to do it.

00:51:15.140 I take

00:51:15.440 willpower

00:51:15.880 out of the

00:51:16.240 equation.

00:51:17.700 Alright

00:51:17.880 so that's

00:51:19.640 the good way

00:51:20.140 to teach

00:51:20.500 nutrition.

00:51:23.580 Alright

00:51:23.980 here in the

00:51:25.980 category of

00:51:26.720 can you believe

00:51:27.420 this person

00:51:27.960 got elected

00:51:28.520 to office

00:51:29.360 do you know

00:51:31.100 representative

00:51:31.700 Jayapal

00:51:33.520 I may be

00:51:35.260 pronouncing that

00:51:36.060 incorrectly

00:51:36.560 which I do

00:51:37.560 not mean

00:51:37.960 any disrespect

00:51:38.640 by

00:51:39.060 but Jayapal

00:51:40.540 Jayapal

00:51:41.640 representative

00:51:42.800 anyway

00:51:44.000 here's what

00:51:44.940 she actually

00:51:45.480 said

00:51:45.760 this is an

00:51:46.260 actual quote

00:51:47.000 I swear to

00:51:47.740 God

00:51:48.060 I'm not

00:51:48.400 making this

00:51:48.920 up

00:51:49.180 she actually

00:51:50.480 said

00:51:50.880 what I'm

00:51:51.240 going to

00:51:51.420 tell you

00:51:51.840 quote

00:51:52.620 she said

00:51:53.860 that her

00:51:54.160 constituents

00:51:55.000 are quote

00:51:55.740 are not

00:51:56.780 talking about

00:51:57.460 inflation

00:51:58.000 by the way

00:51:59.360 they're talking

00:52:00.560 about hey

00:52:01.180 I don't have

00:52:02.220 enough money

00:52:02.720 in my budget

00:52:03.400 to pay for

00:52:04.040 the things

00:52:04.400 I need

00:52:04.760 to pay

00:52:05.500 for

00:52:05.860 what

00:52:10.640 they're not

00:52:13.100 worried about

00:52:13.600 inflation

00:52:14.160 they're worried

00:52:15.500 that their

00:52:16.060 money won't

00:52:16.560 go that

00:52:16.940 far

00:52:17.280 I don't

00:52:20.680 even know

00:52:21.280 what to say

00:52:21.700 about that

00:52:22.340 like

00:52:24.140 normally

00:52:24.920 when I

00:52:25.320 read the

00:52:25.640 news

00:52:25.920 and somebody

00:52:26.320 is being 0.99

00:52:26.640 dumb 1.00

00:52:26.940 I'll add 0.99

00:52:28.060 something to

00:52:28.660 it

00:52:28.860 like you

00:52:29.380 know

00:52:29.480 round out

00:52:30.020 the story

00:52:30.480 there's

00:52:31.580 nothing to

00:52:31.980 add to

00:52:32.340 this

00:52:32.680 this one

00:52:34.320 you just

00:52:34.600 look at

00:52:34.980 and you

00:52:35.160 go

00:52:35.360 how did

00:52:38.480 she get

00:52:38.900 elected

00:52:39.320 anyway

00:52:40.960 I saw

00:52:44.580 that in

00:52:44.880 a Joel

00:52:45.300 Pollack

00:52:45.820 tweet

00:52:46.340 anyway

00:52:47.540 Thomas

00:52:47.980 Massey

00:52:48.420 tweets

00:52:50.680 in response

00:52:51.500 to a

00:52:51.920 FOIA

00:52:52.200 request

00:52:52.780 the CDC

00:52:54.000 literally

00:52:54.520 just admitted

00:52:55.220 they haven't

00:52:55.800 documented

00:52:56.320 a single

00:52:57.120 case

00:52:57.660 of an

00:52:58.480 unvaccinated

00:52:59.340 individual

00:52:59.960 with natural

00:53:00.760 immunity

00:53:01.220 spreading the

00:53:02.540 virus

00:53:02.880 so in

00:53:03.200 other words

00:53:03.620 the CDC

00:53:05.040 does not

00:53:05.700 have one

00:53:06.180 documented

00:53:06.700 case

00:53:07.100 of somebody

00:53:07.500 who got

00:53:07.860 the virus

00:53:08.420 recovered

00:53:09.720 and then

00:53:12.180 somehow

00:53:12.740 spread it

00:53:13.960 later

00:53:14.240 which

00:53:16.160 you know

00:53:16.580 certainly

00:53:18.300 asks the

00:53:19.000 question

00:53:19.320 why

00:53:19.700 people

00:53:20.300 with natural

00:53:20.760 immunity

00:53:21.160 don't have

00:53:22.000 the same

00:53:22.320 rights

00:53:22.600 as the

00:53:23.160 vaccinated

00:53:23.580 now

00:53:24.840 the fact

00:53:25.920 that the

00:53:26.240 CDC

00:53:26.640 does not

00:53:27.900 have that

00:53:28.300 documented

00:53:28.900 does that

00:53:29.320 mean it

00:53:29.600 doesn't

00:53:29.880 exist

00:53:30.300 does that

00:53:32.140 mean it

00:53:32.420 doesn't

00:53:32.700 exist

00:53:33.140 because I'm

00:53:34.120 not sure

00:53:34.480 that's the

00:53:34.940 same

00:53:35.620 exactly

00:53:36.200 so I'll

00:53:36.740 just put a

00:53:37.140 little

00:53:37.380 little yellow

00:53:38.460 flag on

00:53:39.060 this one

00:53:39.440 it could be

00:53:40.700 a really good

00:53:41.540 point that

00:53:42.140 would lead us

00:53:42.640 to some

00:53:43.060 deeper

00:53:43.340 knowledge

00:53:43.740 or it

00:53:44.480 could be

00:53:44.980 that maybe

00:53:46.240 the CDC

00:53:46.860 just

00:53:47.240 I don't know

00:53:48.600 saw some

00:53:50.540 studies but

00:53:51.340 they didn't

00:53:51.720 document it

00:53:52.380 themselves

00:53:52.860 I don't know

00:53:53.820 something like

00:53:54.280 that

00:53:54.520 so I'm not

00:53:55.520 sure this

00:53:56.120 means what

00:53:56.560 we think

00:53:56.980 but it's

00:53:57.380 certainly

00:53:57.660 a flag

00:53:59.820 so here's

00:54:02.160 something to

00:54:02.740 make you lose

00:54:03.520 all trust in

00:54:05.120 your government

00:54:05.560 if you haven't

00:54:06.080 already

00:54:06.340 so you know

00:54:07.280 about the

00:54:07.580 FBI raid on

00:54:09.280 Project Veritas

00:54:10.200 right

00:54:10.640 so the

00:54:11.820 Project Veritas

00:54:12.560 guys were

00:54:13.200 raided by the

00:54:13.740 FBI quite

00:54:14.700 aggressively

00:54:15.180 and over

00:54:17.460 nothing as far

00:54:18.300 as we can

00:54:18.660 tell I mean

00:54:19.220 it was over

00:54:19.660 Biden's

00:54:21.040 daughter's

00:54:21.580 diary

00:54:22.040 but when you

00:54:23.160 hear what

00:54:23.720 Project Veritas

00:54:25.660 did with the

00:54:26.500 diary oh

00:54:27.460 here's something

00:54:27.980 really clever

00:54:28.580 I forgot to

00:54:29.980 tell you about

00:54:30.380 this

00:54:30.620 so Project

00:54:31.960 Veritas

00:54:32.300 is given

00:54:33.340 this diary

00:54:33.920 apparently they

00:54:34.620 didn't steal

00:54:35.140 it somebody

00:54:35.520 gave it to

00:54:35.960 them and

00:54:37.040 they could

00:54:37.480 not verify

00:54:38.120 that it was

00:54:38.700 real and

00:54:39.740 therefore decided

00:54:41.040 not to use

00:54:41.720 it

00:54:42.020 do you hear

00:54:44.000 that

00:54:44.300 the people

00:54:46.280 most reviled

00:54:47.720 for being

00:54:48.940 you know

00:54:49.340 illegitimate

00:54:50.620 by the

00:54:51.440 by the

00:54:51.920 fake news

00:54:52.400 industry

00:54:52.820 they wouldn't

00:54:55.240 publish this

00:54:56.200 because they

00:54:58.160 couldn't verify

00:54:58.840 it was real

00:54:59.500 that's I

00:55:03.180 mean think

00:55:04.100 about that

00:55:04.680 okay but

00:55:05.920 here's the

00:55:06.200 best part

00:55:06.680 here's the

00:55:08.140 best part

00:55:08.660 so then

00:55:10.020 apparently

00:55:11.420 Project

00:55:12.000 Veritas

00:55:12.580 offered to

00:55:14.240 give it

00:55:14.640 back to

00:55:16.420 the Bidens

00:55:17.840 maybe to

00:55:19.120 either to

00:55:19.720 the rightful

00:55:21.220 owner I think

00:55:22.160 to the rightful

00:55:22.680 owner through

00:55:23.960 an attorney

00:55:24.780 and the

00:55:25.960 attorney said

00:55:26.900 no and

00:55:29.000 did not

00:55:29.460 accept it

00:55:30.400 but also

00:55:34.180 didn't debunk

00:55:35.740 it oh

00:55:37.160 actually I

00:55:37.540 don't know if

00:55:37.900 they accepted

00:55:38.360 it or not

00:55:38.760 but they

00:55:39.380 didn't debunk

00:55:40.020 it do you

00:55:42.720 know what

00:55:42.940 that is

00:55:43.400 that's how

00:55:45.060 Project

00:55:45.580 Veritas

00:55:46.040 confirmed it

00:55:47.140 was real

00:55:47.600 they confirmed

00:55:49.880 it was real

00:55:50.600 by giving

00:55:51.920 it back

00:55:52.580 how clever

00:55:55.040 is that

00:55:55.680 because if

00:55:57.680 if they had

00:55:58.360 said oh

00:55:59.260 yeah that's

00:55:59.700 ours we'll

00:56:01.100 take it back

00:56:01.780 then it's

00:56:03.100 confirmed but

00:56:04.360 also if they

00:56:05.300 said no we

00:56:06.660 won't take it

00:56:07.340 back and

00:56:08.500 they don't say

00:56:09.360 one way or

00:56:09.980 another whether

00:56:10.540 it's theirs 0.57

00:56:11.120 then it's

00:56:12.740 theirs

00:56:13.040 right

00:56:14.480 think about

00:56:16.020 how clever

00:56:16.460 that was

00:56:17.020 he actually

00:56:18.560 confirmed it

00:56:19.480 by giving

00:56:20.540 it back

00:56:21.040 or attempting

00:56:22.300 to give it

00:56:22.800 back and

00:56:23.620 whatever the

00:56:24.140 response was

00:56:24.880 would be the

00:56:25.340 confirmation

00:56:25.820 it's really

00:56:27.660 clever so

00:56:28.800 now that you

00:56:29.400 know that

00:56:29.700 Project

00:56:30.020 Veritas

00:56:30.420 did this

00:56:32.100 and you

00:56:32.560 also need

00:56:32.960 to know

00:56:33.180 that Project

00:56:33.640 Veritas was

00:56:34.400 suing the

00:56:34.980 New York

00:56:35.240 Times over

00:56:36.040 some

00:56:37.000 alleged

00:56:38.040 wrong

00:56:40.720 statements

00:56:41.140 about them

00:56:41.620 and now

00:56:45.340 we find

00:56:45.740 out that

00:56:46.380 I hope

00:56:48.900 my story

00:56:49.400 is not

00:56:49.800 lost here

00:56:50.420 and now

00:56:51.180 we find

00:56:51.520 out that

00:56:52.380 from

00:56:54.280 Harmeet

00:56:54.880 Dillon

00:56:55.620 who's

00:56:56.040 an attorney

00:56:56.480 I guess

00:56:57.360 she's an 0.96

00:56:57.700 attorney for

00:56:58.140 Project

00:56:58.600 Veritas

00:56:59.040 and other

00:56:59.600 things

00:56:59.900 and

00:57:01.020 suddenly

00:57:03.020 the

00:57:03.480 New York

00:57:06.940 Times get

00:57:07.400 tipped off

00:57:08.040 by the

00:57:08.400 Feds

00:57:08.780 about

00:57:10.240 well anyway

00:57:13.440 so what are

00:57:14.320 the odds

00:57:14.700 that the

00:57:15.660 New York

00:57:16.880 Times would

00:57:17.800 be getting

00:57:19.160 sued by

00:57:19.740 Project

00:57:20.140 Veritas

00:57:20.540 and then

00:57:21.580 the Feds

00:57:22.020 would tell

00:57:22.360 the New York

00:57:22.840 Times

00:57:23.280 almost immediately

00:57:24.620 about the

00:57:25.520 raid on

00:57:25.920 Project

00:57:26.300 Veritas

00:57:26.660 so in

00:57:27.380 other words

00:57:27.760 there's a

00:57:28.180 New York

00:57:28.440 Times

00:57:28.860 connection

00:57:30.980 with the

00:57:31.760 Feds

00:57:32.960 that is

00:57:34.300 very

00:57:34.540 disturbing

00:57:35.060 so that's

00:57:36.440 the story

00:57:37.160 and it

00:57:39.160 doesn't seem

00:57:39.740 to be for

00:57:40.280 the benefit

00:57:40.700 of the

00:57:40.960 country

00:57:41.280 it's not

00:57:42.440 like they're

00:57:42.920 both

00:57:43.440 patriots

00:57:44.060 it looks

00:57:44.980 like something

00:57:45.580 super weaselly

00:57:46.600 is going

00:57:47.000 on here

00:57:47.460 and massive

00:57:48.940 corruption

00:57:49.420 here's my

00:57:50.820 mystery of

00:57:51.340 the day

00:57:51.660 Bill Gates

00:57:52.340 said

00:57:53.320 that vaccines

00:57:55.920 only quote

00:57:56.680 a slightly

00:57:57.280 reduced

00:57:57.820 transmission

00:57:58.600 to which

00:58:00.540 I said

00:58:01.180 wait what

00:58:02.180 the official

00:58:04.300 story

00:58:04.900 is that

00:58:05.740 they greatly

00:58:06.460 reduced

00:58:07.460 transmission

00:58:08.060 like a

00:58:08.520 lot

00:58:08.840 you know

00:58:09.840 not like

00:58:10.260 20%

00:58:10.880 I'm talking

00:58:11.460 like you

00:58:12.200 know

00:58:12.320 800%

00:58:13.160 times

00:58:13.680 we're talking

00:58:14.180 about

00:58:14.440 a lot

00:58:15.460 but Bill

00:58:17.700 Gates

00:58:18.140 who I

00:58:19.340 would imagine

00:58:20.080 is one of the

00:58:20.560 most well

00:58:21.340 informed people

00:58:22.160 in the country

00:58:22.740 and smart 0.77

00:58:23.780 seems to

00:58:25.300 believe the

00:58:25.740 opposite

00:58:26.180 of the

00:58:27.120 official

00:58:27.440 story

00:58:27.900 why would

00:58:29.420 that be

00:58:29.800 I don't

00:58:31.720 know the

00:58:32.000 answer

00:58:32.220 to that

00:58:32.500 and we

00:58:32.800 can't

00:58:33.000 read

00:58:33.140 his mind

00:58:33.500 but let

00:58:33.800 me

00:58:33.880 give you

00:58:34.300 some more

00:58:34.660 on this

00:58:34.880 story

00:58:35.180 so then

00:58:36.340 when I

00:58:36.740 asked that

00:58:37.180 somebody

00:58:37.720 sent me

00:58:38.320 a study

00:58:39.160 that seemed

00:58:40.240 to indicate

00:58:40.920 but from

00:58:41.320 September

00:58:41.760 they indicated

00:58:43.200 that there

00:58:43.720 was no

00:58:44.640 correlation

00:58:45.220 between

00:58:45.760 vaccination

00:58:46.440 rates

00:58:47.040 and

00:58:47.760 lowering

00:58:49.280 transmission

00:58:49.940 so there's

00:58:52.240 an actual

00:58:52.600 study of

00:58:53.220 different

00:58:53.500 countries

00:58:53.960 and they

00:58:54.880 look at

00:58:55.480 the vaccination

00:58:55.980 rates

00:58:56.560 and they

00:58:57.200 say there's

00:58:57.520 no correlation

00:58:58.160 the more

00:58:59.480 vaccinated

00:59:00.020 you are

00:59:00.640 it doesn't

00:59:01.060 seem to

00:59:01.400 have any

00:59:01.840 impact on

00:59:03.320 transmission

00:59:03.900 so is

00:59:06.080 Bill Gates

00:59:06.500 right

00:59:06.800 so he

00:59:08.640 says so

00:59:09.200 and you

00:59:09.680 know he's

00:59:09.920 pretty well

00:59:10.320 informed

00:59:10.760 and there's

00:59:12.500 this serious

00:59:13.240 study of

00:59:14.740 a number of

00:59:15.280 different

00:59:15.480 countries that

00:59:16.080 showed there

00:59:16.380 was no

00:59:16.620 correlation

00:59:17.140 and that

00:59:18.320 would

00:59:18.720 indicate

00:59:19.300 exactly what

00:59:21.080 Bill Gates

00:59:21.520 said that

00:59:22.340 the vaccinations

00:59:23.500 don't reduce

00:59:25.960 transmission

00:59:26.560 do you think

00:59:28.020 that's the

00:59:28.420 whole story

00:59:29.060 right there

00:59:29.480 do you think

00:59:30.420 I'm done

00:59:30.860 nope

00:59:32.220 nope

00:59:33.040 because it

00:59:33.880 took about

00:59:34.240 a minute

00:59:34.660 for Jason

00:59:36.300 Lewis

00:59:36.680 who is also

00:59:37.880 a medical

00:59:38.320 researcher

00:59:38.840 PhD

00:59:39.360 smart guy

00:59:40.580 knows what

00:59:41.080 he's doing

00:59:41.440 and he does

00:59:42.540 medical research

00:59:43.240 so he knows

00:59:44.500 how to do

00:59:44.900 this stuff

00:59:45.280 so he looks

00:59:47.120 at it

00:59:47.480 and basically

00:59:48.800 he shows you

00:59:49.800 the data

00:59:50.360 that is exactly

00:59:51.160 the opposite

00:59:51.760 right

00:59:53.920 in the United

00:59:54.520 States

00:59:54.980 for example

00:59:55.600 and the other

00:59:56.160 thing said

00:59:56.580 that in the

00:59:56.980 United States

00:59:57.460 there was

00:59:57.720 also no

00:59:58.160 correlation

00:59:58.600 but according

00:59:59.700 to Jason

01:00:00.740 Lewis

01:00:01.080 who seems

01:00:01.900 very credible

01:00:02.660 at least

01:00:03.280 as far as

01:00:04.100 you can tell

01:00:04.500 on Twitter

01:00:05.020 shows us

01:00:06.860 the data

01:00:07.300 that sees

01:00:07.760 the opposite

01:00:08.460 it's the

01:00:09.780 exact opposite

01:00:10.480 and strongly

01:00:11.380 the opposite

01:00:11.960 what do you

01:00:13.960 think of that

01:00:14.440 so what is

01:00:15.420 true

01:00:15.680 we've got

01:00:16.620 one study

01:00:17.220 that we

01:00:17.560 can't verify

01:00:18.500 that says

01:00:19.880 there's no

01:00:20.260 correlation

01:00:20.720 we've got

01:00:22.080 another study

01:00:22.760 that says

01:00:23.360 oh yeah

01:00:23.800 it's really

01:00:24.140 strong

01:00:24.500 here it is

01:00:25.500 well

01:00:27.440 let's say

01:00:28.980 a few

01:00:29.260 things about

01:00:29.880 the study

01:00:30.640 that said

01:00:30.980 there's no

01:00:31.360 correlation

01:00:31.840 do you think

01:00:33.140 that anybody

01:00:33.620 can compare

01:00:34.320 countries

01:00:34.900 different countries

01:00:35.860 and determine

01:00:36.900 that one

01:00:38.440 variable

01:00:38.980 in that country

01:00:39.960 worked

01:00:40.640 it's not a

01:00:42.620 thing

01:00:42.900 if you wanted

01:00:44.680 to find out

01:00:45.740 if the

01:00:46.580 vaccinations

01:00:47.080 were reducing

01:00:47.940 the spread

01:00:48.800 you would need

01:00:49.940 two countries

01:00:50.660 that are exactly

01:00:51.340 the same

01:00:51.900 not sort

01:00:53.480 of similar

01:00:53.960 in your

01:00:54.340 mind

01:00:54.800 but exactly

01:00:55.560 the same

01:00:56.060 and one

01:00:57.420 with vaccinations

01:00:58.120 one without

01:00:58.780 then you might

01:00:59.940 have something

01:01:00.500 especially if you

01:01:01.580 did multiple

01:01:02.040 countries

01:01:02.520 with multiple

01:01:03.640 scenarios like

01:01:04.540 that

01:01:04.800 but if you're

01:01:06.480 just looking

01:01:06.940 at an apple

01:01:08.180 and an orange

01:01:08.940 which is what

01:01:09.900 any two country

01:01:10.720 comparisons are

01:01:11.600 because there's

01:01:12.300 lots of stuff

01:01:13.200 different in

01:01:13.680 every country

01:01:14.260 if you're looking

01:01:15.560 at an apple

01:01:16.160 and an orange

01:01:16.740 and you say

01:01:17.220 the apple

01:01:17.640 did better

01:01:18.120 than the orange

01:01:18.720 you really

01:01:20.180 haven't said

01:01:21.140 anything

01:01:21.660 because there

01:01:23.320 are all kinds

01:01:23.980 of differences

01:01:24.460 between an apple

01:01:25.340 and an orange

01:01:25.920 and why are you

01:01:27.000 picking out one

01:01:27.600 variable and

01:01:28.220 imagining that

01:01:28.940 nothing else

01:01:30.100 is changing

01:01:30.600 let me give you

01:01:31.760 a hint of what

01:01:32.480 else could be

01:01:33.080 wrong

01:01:33.440 do you think

01:01:34.360 there's a

01:01:34.740 correlation

01:01:35.180 between how

01:01:36.560 vaccinated a

01:01:37.440 country is

01:01:38.100 and how

01:01:38.940 aggressively

01:01:39.580 they test

01:01:40.840 there is

01:01:43.940 right

01:01:44.240 probably the

01:01:47.120 most advanced

01:01:48.420 countries with

01:01:49.320 the best

01:01:49.640 health care

01:01:50.080 systems

01:01:50.580 the ones

01:01:51.420 who would

01:01:51.720 vaccinate

01:01:52.320 the most

01:01:52.900 probably also

01:01:54.080 have the

01:01:54.360 best testing

01:01:55.120 so if you

01:01:57.540 test more

01:01:58.200 do you find

01:01:59.040 more

01:01:59.340 of course

01:01:59.780 you do

01:02:00.100 right

01:02:00.960 so you

01:02:01.820 should expect

01:02:02.540 you should

01:02:04.420 expect

01:02:04.860 that the

01:02:05.780 more vaccinated

01:02:06.440 you are

01:02:07.060 the more

01:02:07.720 testing you're

01:02:08.380 doing too

01:02:08.860 and you

01:02:09.720 should have

01:02:10.240 the most

01:02:10.900 cases

01:02:11.520 where there's

01:02:12.560 the most

01:02:12.880 vaccinations

01:02:13.440 because they're

01:02:14.100 looking for

01:02:14.540 the most

01:02:14.840 cases

01:02:15.240 right

01:02:16.600 doesn't that

01:02:18.240 make sense

01:02:18.600 to you

01:02:18.960 all right

01:02:20.920 here's another

01:02:21.400 one

01:02:21.880 how many of

01:02:24.140 you had this

01:02:24.620 experience

01:02:25.140 after you

01:02:25.740 got vaccinated

01:02:26.400 you changed

01:02:27.100 your behavior

01:02:27.720 to riskier

01:02:28.660 behavior

01:02:29.140 anybody

01:02:30.220 I did

01:02:30.980 did anybody

01:02:32.700 change their

01:02:33.780 behavior to

01:02:34.520 riskier behavior

01:02:35.540 after they got

01:02:36.380 vaccinated

01:02:36.820 yeah look at

01:02:38.800 the yeses

01:02:39.420 right

01:02:40.580 there's still

01:02:41.280 some no's

01:02:41.900 but it

01:02:44.240 looks like

01:02:44.640 most people

01:02:45.500 did

01:02:45.760 I did

01:02:46.560 let's say

01:02:49.060 you had

01:02:49.360 been single

01:02:49.920 if you had

01:02:51.040 been single

01:02:51.580 and you

01:02:52.420 were unvaccinated

01:02:53.440 do you think

01:02:54.760 you might

01:02:55.060 sit it out

01:02:55.740 and say

01:02:56.940 I don't even

01:02:57.920 think I'm

01:02:58.280 going to date

01:02:58.860 now let's

01:03:00.580 say you get

01:03:01.040 fully vaccinated

01:03:01.840 and you know

01:03:02.600 you say

01:03:02.980 I'll only date

01:03:03.840 somebody who's

01:03:04.280 fully vaccinated

01:03:05.020 well then you're

01:03:06.160 going to go 0.95

01:03:06.400 nuts right 0.98

01:03:07.000 because you

01:03:08.040 can say

01:03:08.260 well that's

01:03:08.620 close enough

01:03:09.200 I got the

01:03:09.880 risk down

01:03:10.340 to where I

01:03:10.680 want it

01:03:10.960 I'll do

01:03:11.220 that

01:03:11.440 so the

01:03:12.660 other thing

01:03:13.020 is where

01:03:13.680 people are

01:03:14.620 most vaccinated

01:03:15.500 they should

01:03:16.060 also be

01:03:16.600 the least

01:03:17.320 cautious

01:03:17.800 how do

01:03:19.100 they calculate

01:03:19.880 that

01:03:20.240 how about

01:03:22.340 this

01:03:22.700 and do

01:03:24.720 the places

01:03:25.420 that have

01:03:25.800 the most

01:03:26.140 vaccinations

01:03:26.740 also drop

01:03:27.560 the restrictions

01:03:28.220 well of

01:03:29.640 course

01:03:30.000 of course

01:03:31.540 because if

01:03:32.260 the vaccination

01:03:32.760 rate gets

01:03:33.340 high enough

01:03:33.820 it's harder

01:03:34.560 to keep

01:03:34.980 all the

01:03:35.240 restrictions

01:03:35.720 on

01:03:36.000 so there's

01:03:37.680 that too

01:03:38.080 all right

01:03:39.100 so I

01:03:40.500 don't believe

01:03:41.200 that Bill

01:03:42.000 Gates is

01:03:42.500 necessarily

01:03:43.200 right on

01:03:43.840 this

01:03:44.100 and I'm

01:03:44.820 going to

01:03:45.120 take a

01:03:45.800 stand

01:03:46.160 against him

01:03:46.880 on this

01:03:48.640 question

01:03:49.180 now

01:03:50.120 remember I

01:03:51.860 taught you

01:03:52.240 that if I

01:03:52.720 sort of make

01:03:53.340 a statistical

01:03:54.260 argument

01:03:55.540 it doesn't

01:03:56.140 mean I'm

01:03:56.460 wrong if it

01:03:56.980 doesn't happen

01:03:57.480 it just

01:03:58.860 means that

01:03:59.480 that's how

01:04:00.140 statistics work

01:04:01.040 so here's

01:04:03.520 my thinking

01:04:04.060 here are the

01:04:05.220 parts I think

01:04:05.960 we do know

01:04:06.500 about the

01:04:06.860 vaccination

01:04:07.360 it makes

01:04:08.120 it far

01:04:08.460 less likely

01:04:09.040 that you'll

01:04:09.480 get it in

01:04:09.900 the first

01:04:10.200 place

01:04:10.560 true or

01:04:11.120 false

01:04:11.420 would you

01:04:12.960 agree that

01:04:13.600 being vaccinated

01:04:14.480 has a big

01:04:16.160 impact on

01:04:16.800 whether you

01:04:17.160 get it in

01:04:17.860 the first

01:04:18.220 place

01:04:18.660 seeing some

01:04:21.800 differences of

01:04:22.620 opinions

01:04:23.020 so I think

01:04:24.320 separately from

01:04:25.440 the infection

01:04:26.220 rate I think

01:04:27.180 that we do

01:04:27.720 know that

01:04:28.280 that you're

01:04:29.340 less likely

01:04:29.860 to get

01:04:30.220 it

01:04:30.740 now

01:04:31.380 so vaccinated

01:04:36.180 you're less

01:04:36.680 likely to get

01:04:37.240 it

01:04:37.400 do we also

01:04:38.160 know that

01:04:38.840 it will clear

01:04:39.600 up faster

01:04:40.220 if you're

01:04:40.660 vaccinated

01:04:41.080 in other

01:04:42.000 words if

01:04:43.540 a vaccinated

01:04:44.700 and unvaccinated

01:04:45.600 person get

01:04:46.140 infected at the

01:04:46.880 same time

01:04:47.500 won't the

01:04:48.980 vaccinated person

01:04:50.000 recover in

01:04:51.300 say half the

01:04:52.080 time

01:04:52.360 I think so

01:04:54.140 so I would

01:04:55.220 say that

01:04:55.660 common sense

01:04:56.480 which is

01:04:57.680 often wrong

01:04:58.640 and logic

01:05:00.180 dictate that

01:05:01.260 if fewer

01:05:02.040 people are

01:05:02.480 getting it

01:05:02.960 and they're

01:05:03.320 having it

01:05:03.760 for less

01:05:04.180 time

01:05:04.620 even if

01:05:05.440 they had

01:05:05.840 the same

01:05:06.260 viral load

01:05:07.040 vaccinated

01:05:08.140 people would

01:05:08.760 spread it

01:05:09.120 way less

01:05:09.680 even if

01:05:11.720 they had

01:05:12.020 the same

01:05:12.340 viral load

01:05:12.980 because they

01:05:13.580 have it

01:05:13.840 for half

01:05:14.200 the time

01:05:14.680 and they

01:05:16.260 only get

01:05:16.740 it maybe

01:05:17.500 20% as

01:05:18.420 often

01:05:18.780 so

01:05:20.620 I would

01:05:23.380 say this

01:05:23.780 is one of

01:05:24.200 my opinions

01:05:24.720 that you've

01:05:25.160 got to put

01:05:25.540 a really

01:05:26.020 big question

01:05:27.920 mark on

01:05:28.520 because I

01:05:29.520 have a

01:05:29.920 question

01:05:30.220 mark on

01:05:30.600 my own

01:05:30.920 opinion

01:05:31.180 I could

01:05:31.960 easily be

01:05:32.740 convinced

01:05:33.140 in either

01:05:33.700 direction

01:05:34.100 at this

01:05:34.440 point

01:05:34.660 I could

01:05:35.340 easily

01:05:35.780 be

01:05:36.040 convinced

01:05:36.480 so

01:05:37.840 some

01:05:38.220 to watch

01:05:39.020 for

01:05:39.320 John

01:05:41.900 Kerry is

01:05:42.360 giving China 0.98

01:05:42.960 a pass

01:05:43.760 he's the

01:05:44.340 main climate

01:05:44.960 guy

01:05:45.220 so he's

01:05:45.560 not making

01:05:46.000 trouble

01:05:46.360 in China

01:05:47.600 about the

01:05:48.060 Uyghur 0.99

01:05:48.420 situation

01:05:49.040 ethnic

01:05:49.500 genocide

01:05:50.260 and so

01:05:51.240 I tweeted

01:05:51.660 that

01:05:52.060 Hitler's 0.98

01:05:53.460 biggest

01:05:53.740 strategic

01:05:54.340 failure

01:05:54.760 was not

01:05:55.240 making

01:05:55.520 Germany's

01:05:56.000 economy

01:05:56.400 essential

01:05:56.960 to the

01:05:57.340 world

01:05:57.520 supply

01:05:57.980 chain

01:05:58.380 before

01:05:59.420 he

01:05:59.680 embarked

01:06:00.100 on

01:06:00.280 ethnic

01:06:00.760 genocide

01:06:01.280 but 0.70

01:06:02.900 China

01:06:03.560 did it

01:06:03.940 right

01:06:04.240 if you're

01:06:05.300 going to

01:06:05.460 do

01:06:05.620 ethnic

01:06:06.080 genocide

01:06:06.500 you need

01:06:06.940 to make

01:06:07.200 the world

01:06:07.580 dependent

01:06:08.040 on you

01:06:08.580 first

01:06:09.020 and then

01:06:10.060 they'll

01:06:10.220 let you

01:06:10.480 do it

01:06:10.840 so I

01:06:12.880 always

01:06:13.140 thought

01:06:13.360 that

01:06:13.560 never

01:06:13.840 again

01:06:14.220 was

01:06:15.820 not

01:06:16.340 just

01:06:16.640 specific

01:06:17.140 to the

01:06:17.720 Jewish

01:06:18.200 community

01:06:18.760 you know

01:06:20.240 I suppose

01:06:21.080 it is

01:06:21.600 though

01:06:22.020 I mean

01:06:22.560 when I

01:06:22.800 see this

01:06:23.160 happening

01:06:23.480 I guess

01:06:23.980 the never

01:06:24.760 again

01:06:25.000 is just

01:06:25.640 for the

01:06:26.600 Jewish

01:06:26.840 community

01:06:27.320 because

01:06:28.060 it's

01:06:28.260 happening

01:06:28.600 there's

01:06:30.160 an

01:06:30.320 ethnic

01:06:30.840 cleansing

01:06:31.780 going on

01:06:32.340 right now

01:06:32.920 so you

01:06:33.740 can't say

01:06:34.120 that didn't

01:06:34.540 happen again

01:06:35.080 because it's

01:06:35.640 happening

01:06:35.940 right now

01:06:36.760 and

01:06:38.300 John Kerry

01:06:40.980 doesn't seem

01:06:41.460 to care

01:06:41.760 as long as

01:06:42.380 China has 0.91

01:06:43.340 a supply

01:06:44.000 chain

01:06:44.260 all right

01:06:45.420 speaking of

01:06:46.660 supply chain

01:06:47.220 Joshua Steinman

01:06:48.780 who you should

01:06:49.520 follow on

01:06:50.260 Twitter also

01:06:50.880 expert in

01:06:53.040 cyber security

01:06:53.780 as well as

01:06:54.700 other things

01:06:55.100 he said

01:06:55.740 he used to

01:06:56.200 coordinate

01:06:56.700 under Trump

01:06:57.500 he coordinated

01:06:58.060 the US

01:06:58.500 supply chain

01:06:59.040 policy

01:06:59.560 when he was

01:07:01.080 on the

01:07:01.400 National Security

01:07:02.180 Council

01:07:02.520 and he had

01:07:04.340 some ideas

01:07:04.900 that I tweeted

01:07:05.620 you can go

01:07:06.160 see him

01:07:06.400 you should

01:07:06.640 follow him

01:07:07.160 Joshua Steinman

01:07:08.880 S-T-E-I-N-M-A-N 1.00

01:07:11.200 and his

01:07:13.280 you'll find him

01:07:14.560 easily

01:07:14.820 and he was

01:07:17.020 talking about

01:07:17.480 creating American

01:07:18.240 manufacturing hubs

01:07:19.480 so in other words

01:07:21.100 you pick a region

01:07:22.180 that's the perfect

01:07:22.980 region

01:07:23.520 transportation wise

01:07:24.860 and energy wise

01:07:25.700 and you just

01:07:26.740 build all the

01:07:28.300 parts for

01:07:29.740 let's say

01:07:30.160 microchips

01:07:30.780 or some

01:07:32.800 other zone

01:07:33.320 might be

01:07:33.800 the full

01:07:34.740 supply chain

01:07:35.460 for some

01:07:36.100 other industry

01:07:36.720 and apparently

01:07:37.720 it works

01:07:39.540 in some

01:07:40.140 Asian countries

01:07:41.080 and it's

01:07:41.820 just a good

01:07:42.300 model

01:07:42.660 but I don't

01:07:43.660 know that we

01:07:44.040 have anybody

01:07:44.480 in this country

01:07:45.180 who could

01:07:45.600 organize something

01:07:46.340 like that

01:07:46.820 maybe need

01:07:48.180 more of a

01:07:48.620 totalitarian

01:07:49.280 government

01:07:50.360 to pull that

01:07:51.020 off

01:07:51.260 but it's

01:07:53.040 a good

01:07:53.240 idea

01:07:53.540 and we

01:07:53.840 should

01:07:54.080 try to

01:07:57.040 study a

01:07:57.500 subject

01:07:57.780 first

01:07:58.300 Scott

01:07:59.300 James

01:08:00.200 let me

01:08:00.620 talk to

01:08:01.000 you

01:08:01.300 James

01:08:02.420 James

01:08:02.700 first of all

01:08:03.800 if you

01:08:05.500 and I

01:08:05.940 so James

01:08:07.040 says

01:08:07.340 try to

01:08:07.800 study a

01:08:08.280 subject

01:08:08.520 first

01:08:09.140 Scott

01:08:09.680 number

01:08:11.880 number one

01:08:12.160 James

01:08:12.540 the odds

01:08:14.280 are

01:08:14.540 I know

01:08:15.420 more about

01:08:15.860 these topics

01:08:16.460 than you

01:08:16.840 the odds

01:08:18.220 are you're

01:08:18.640 wrong

01:08:19.020 and I'm

01:08:19.920 right

01:08:20.220 and it

01:08:20.640 makes you

01:08:20.920 think I

01:08:21.260 didn't

01:08:21.420 study

01:08:21.720 enough

01:08:22.020 why do

01:08:23.340 I say

01:08:23.600 that

01:08:23.920 because

01:08:26.100 that's

01:08:26.680 my usual

01:08:27.640 experience

01:08:28.360 it doesn't

01:08:30.340 mean I'm

01:08:30.640 right all

01:08:30.980 the time

01:08:31.380 but the

01:08:32.120 only reason

01:08:32.840 I get

01:08:34.580 to do

01:08:34.920 this

01:08:35.260 is because

01:08:36.560 I'm right

01:08:36.980 more than

01:08:37.400 most people

01:08:38.000 so statistically

01:08:40.160 speaking if I

01:08:41.300 didn't know

01:08:41.580 anything about

01:08:42.140 you I

01:08:43.240 would say

01:08:43.560 I'm probably

01:08:44.220 right and

01:08:45.180 you're probably

01:08:45.540 just wrong

01:08:46.100 and it looks

01:08:46.640 like I'm

01:08:47.020 wrong because

01:08:47.600 we disagree

01:08:48.320 number two

01:08:49.800 try to

01:08:50.860 understand what

01:08:51.540 this live

01:08:52.080 stream is

01:08:52.640 if you came

01:08:54.120 to this live

01:08:54.740 stream for

01:08:55.260 science

01:08:55.820 well you're 1.00

01:08:57.200 pretty dumb 1.00

01:08:57.740 because this 1.00

01:08:59.120 isn't science

01:08:59.800 if you came

01:09:01.080 to this to

01:09:01.760 see what

01:09:03.020 questions the

01:09:04.640 public has

01:09:05.900 because the

01:09:07.140 fake news

01:09:07.900 is not

01:09:08.260 giving them

01:09:08.800 everything

01:09:09.160 they need

01:09:09.720 this would

01:09:10.460 be a good

01:09:10.760 place to

01:09:11.160 come

01:09:11.460 because I

01:09:12.900 try to

01:09:13.320 approach the

01:09:13.960 news like

01:09:14.940 a consumer

01:09:15.680 I'm not

01:09:17.120 trying to

01:09:17.600 approach the

01:09:18.120 news as

01:09:18.620 an expert

01:09:19.140 if I were

01:09:20.340 approaching it

01:09:20.860 as an expert

01:09:21.440 then yeah

01:09:22.240 I'd do a

01:09:23.260 deep dive

01:09:23.720 and everything

01:09:24.160 I'd have to

01:09:24.680 before I

01:09:25.280 talked about

01:09:25.700 it but

01:09:26.420 I'm doing

01:09:26.800 it as a

01:09:27.360 consumer who

01:09:28.120 looks at

01:09:28.780 the news

01:09:29.200 and says

01:09:29.660 I'm not

01:09:30.440 getting any

01:09:30.860 news here

01:09:31.380 why don't

01:09:32.880 I have any

01:09:33.360 news

01:09:33.740 why is the

01:09:34.380 news lying

01:09:34.920 to me

01:09:35.340 right

01:09:36.200 so that's

01:09:37.280 that's the

01:09:38.500 point of this

01:09:39.260 live stream

01:09:40.040 is to be

01:09:41.300 basically on

01:09:42.200 your side

01:09:42.720 asking the

01:09:43.220 same questions

01:09:43.780 that you

01:09:44.100 would ask

01:09:44.540 but on top

01:09:45.660 of that

01:09:46.000 I have one

01:09:47.160 expertise

01:09:47.800 maybe two

01:09:49.200 if you count

01:09:50.180 business

01:09:50.680 but persuasion

01:09:51.980 and risk

01:09:53.460 management

01:09:53.880 decisions

01:09:54.420 are areas

01:09:55.480 that I do

01:09:56.140 have expertise

01:09:56.720 in

01:09:57.020 and

01:09:58.040 so in

01:09:59.960 those cases

01:10:00.540 I'll go

01:10:00.920 deeper

01:10:01.260 but for

01:10:01.940 everything

01:10:02.300 else

01:10:02.720 I'm taking

01:10:04.280 a consumer's

01:10:05.300 view

01:10:05.540 and I

01:10:06.440 think that

01:10:07.260 we need to

01:10:08.320 lean on the

01:10:08.880 media and

01:10:09.400 science to

01:10:10.280 answer these

01:10:11.220 questions

01:10:11.880 yes and 0.99

01:10:13.480 bullshit detection 0.98

01:10:14.260 I think I 0.88

01:10:15.020 add that to

01:10:15.680 the mix as

01:10:16.500 well

01:10:16.680 so

01:10:17.880 I keep

01:10:21.100 being asked

01:10:21.620 about Norm

01:10:22.100 McDonald's

01:10:22.720 fictional

01:10:23.380 autobiography

01:10:24.540 review

01:10:25.340 I gotta tell

01:10:27.720 you I'm not

01:10:28.100 gonna read it

01:10:28.720 so you

01:10:30.560 could ask me

01:10:31.040 every day

01:10:31.500 and you

01:10:32.740 do

01:10:33.000 you ask me

01:10:34.240 every day

01:10:34.740 and I'm

01:10:35.360 sure it's

01:10:35.640 good

01:10:35.920 I just

01:10:37.200 I just

01:10:38.440 am not

01:10:39.040 gonna read

01:10:39.360 any books

01:10:39.820 I don't

01:10:41.160 know when

01:10:41.460 the next

01:10:42.000 time I'll

01:10:42.360 read a

01:10:42.600 book

01:10:42.740 the only

01:10:43.360 time I

01:10:43.740 read books

01:10:44.300 is on

01:10:44.800 airplanes

01:10:45.240 and I'm

01:10:45.920 not flying

01:10:46.420 anywhere

01:10:46.740 so I

01:10:48.540 have no

01:10:48.920 no plans

01:10:49.820 to read a

01:10:50.260 book

01:10:50.500 anytime soon

01:10:51.960 and I

01:10:53.860 also think

01:10:54.500 that in

01:10:55.160 the world

01:10:55.600 of the

01:10:55.880 internet

01:10:56.220 reading an

01:10:57.560 entire book

01:10:58.240 is

01:10:59.400 doesn't

01:11:00.600 make as

01:11:00.940 much sense

01:11:01.440 as it

01:11:01.720 used to

01:11:02.080 so

01:11:03.320 if you're

01:11:04.340 entertained

01:11:04.640 by it

01:11:05.080 sure

01:11:05.300 but

01:11:05.680 if you're

01:11:06.900 doing it

01:11:07.200 for

01:11:07.360 information

01:11:08.020 you can

01:11:09.460 find the

01:11:09.940 summary

01:11:10.240 somewhere

01:11:10.720 oh

01:11:14.540 somebody

01:11:14.780 says

01:11:15.020 Bill Gates

01:11:15.520 is

01:11:15.860 increasing

01:11:16.720 the

01:11:17.360 the demand

01:11:19.460 for

01:11:19.700 therapeutics

01:11:20.560 maybe

01:11:22.080 maybe

01:11:23.520 yeah

01:11:29.840 there

01:11:30.380 there

01:11:30.400 have

01:11:30.920 been

01:11:31.040 years

01:11:31.380 where

01:11:31.620 I

01:11:31.740 wrote

01:11:32.060 more

01:11:32.320 books

01:11:32.600 than

01:11:32.800 I

01:11:32.960 read

01:11:33.220 I

01:11:33.960 don't

01:11:34.100 know

01:11:34.220 if

01:11:34.340 anybody

01:11:34.580 can

01:11:34.780 say

01:11:34.960 that

01:11:35.300 besides

01:11:35.800 me

01:11:36.160 audible

01:11:38.160 books

01:11:38.780 are

01:11:38.920 still

01:11:39.100 good

01:11:39.320 yeah

01:11:39.540 especially

01:11:40.160 if

01:11:40.380 you're

01:11:40.500 doing

01:11:40.720 something

01:11:41.120 if

01:11:41.940 you're

01:11:42.120 exercising

01:11:42.660 all

01:11:43.480 right

01:11:43.600 that's

01:11:43.840 all

01:11:43.960 for

01:11:44.060 now

01:11:44.460 and

01:11:45.400 oh

01:11:46.440 I

01:11:46.620 ran

01:11:46.820 long

01:11:47.160 yes

01:11:48.920 I

01:11:49.120 ran

01:11:49.260 very

01:11:49.480 long

01:11:49.780 all

01:11:50.280 right

01:11:50.380 I'll

01:11:50.680 talk

01:11:50.840 to

01:11:50.960 you

01:11:51.180 tomorrow

01:11:52.140 all

01:11:53.340 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 12, 2021

Episode 1559 Scott Adams： Today's Show Will Mostly be About the Public Brainwashing We Are All Experiencing

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript