Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1563 Scott Adams： I Will Tell You Which Public Figures Are Lying to You Today. Spoiler： Most of Them

00:00:00.200 Good morning, everybody.

00:00:02.420 By the way, do you know why I always open a drawer

00:00:04.920 and take out my notes before I do the simultaneous ep?

00:00:09.220 It's not because, just because I don't remember it.

00:00:13.460 That's part of it.

00:00:14.840 But it's also...

00:00:16.600 I'm seeing funny memes go by on the Locals platform.

00:00:21.300 By the way, Locals has in their comments,

00:00:23.860 you can embed memes and pictures.

00:00:26.460 So the Locals' comment stream is freaking hilarious

00:00:31.580 compared to the YouTube stream, which is just text.

00:00:36.540 But when you look at the Locals' feed, it's hard not to laugh.

00:00:41.800 All right, so the reason that I always do this,

00:00:45.560 sometimes YouTube clips off this part,

00:00:49.160 but let me tell you why I do it.

00:00:52.280 So listen to it again, see if you can hear it.

00:00:56.460 It's basically an introduction.

00:01:01.800 So it's also a trigger, or a key, as we say in hypnosis.

00:01:06.500 If you hear it every time, it should,

00:01:09.560 if you like the content from prior shows,

00:01:12.700 it should put you immediately in the headspace.

00:01:15.680 So it's sort of a trick

00:01:16.900 to put you in the right frame of mind by repetition.

00:01:20.840 Same as really any theme music for any show.

00:01:24.820 It's the same idea.

00:01:26.520 So all kinds of stuff going on today.

00:01:30.580 I'm going to be cursing a little bit.

00:01:34.220 There will be some cursing coming up.

00:01:36.880 So this would not be the one that you want to share

00:01:39.400 with your sensitive friends and or children.

00:01:44.400 Well, let's say children who are not familiar with swear words.

00:01:51.220 I'm pretty sure any kid under 14 or older is going to be fine.

00:01:55.920 And you probably shouldn't show this to anybody who's under 14.

00:01:59.580 But anybody over 14 has heard all the words, right?

00:02:02.860 By the way, have you ever heard 14-year-olds talk to each other?

00:02:05.560 It's a lot worse than what I say.

00:02:09.600 So they're not going to be damaged by it.

00:02:11.640 But anyway, that's just your warning.

00:02:13.360 But first topic is, I'll be swearing on the very next topic,

00:02:17.600 in case you're wondering.

00:02:19.640 The very next topic, we'll have some anger and cursing.

00:02:23.440 And then we'll get back into the fun stuff.

00:02:25.780 But first, there might be an Alzheimer vaccination.

00:02:29.680 According to the Telegraph,

00:02:31.540 there's a vaccine against Alzheimer's disease.

00:02:34.200 It could be on the horizon, because it's worked in mice.

00:02:37.620 They actually...

00:02:40.200 Yeah, I see your comment, Carpe.

00:02:44.800 I'll get back to that.

00:02:48.000 And it actually reversed memory loss in mice.

00:02:53.060 What?

00:02:53.900 How do you reverse memory loss?

00:02:56.460 How do you even do that?

00:02:58.420 Apparently, that's the thing.

00:03:01.080 Oh, oh, there's something wrong.

00:03:02.900 I have done something very bad.

00:03:07.900 You know what it is, right?

00:03:10.000 Yes, you do.

00:03:12.800 Let's fix this.

00:03:14.100 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:03:16.000 a tank or a gel, just a dine, a canteen jug or a flask,

00:03:18.380 a vessel of any kind.

00:03:20.900 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:03:22.820 I like coffee.

00:03:24.460 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:03:27.140 the dopamine hit of the day,

00:03:29.060 the thing that makes everything better,

00:03:30.520 except your memory, apparently.

00:03:32.940 It's called the simultaneous sip,

00:03:35.280 and it happens now.

00:03:35.880 Go.

00:03:36.040 Go.

00:03:40.420 Oh.

00:03:42.960 I don't know how I went so long without that.

00:03:47.460 But now all systems are operating 100%.

00:03:51.740 So, yes, there's this vaccination, allegedly,

00:03:56.760 that works on animals that gives them their memory back.

00:04:00.880 Now, and the story goes on to describe exactly how they do it,

00:04:05.400 and it actually sounds like something that works.

00:04:08.500 They found the exact problem with the memory,

00:04:10.820 and they reproduced a, well, they created a vaccine

00:04:13.820 that operates directly against that memory loss element.

00:04:19.980 Well, here are a few thoughts on this.

00:04:24.200 Number one, why are we calling this a vaccination?

00:04:29.460 Anybody?

00:04:31.280 Did you notice I slipped that in?

00:04:33.080 Did you uncritically accept that this was a vaccination?

00:04:40.380 Did any of you say, vaccination?

00:04:43.620 That doesn't sound like a vaccination, does it?

00:04:49.060 All right.

00:04:49.920 Well, I guess it could be used as a preventive,

00:04:52.880 so it could be a prophylactic.

00:04:54.480 If you get the shot,

00:04:55.760 they're thinking that maybe it might actually be a vaccination.

00:04:59.420 It might actually be an actual vaccination.

00:05:02.320 that prevents you from getting Alzheimer's,

00:05:04.620 but I don't think so.

00:05:06.440 I think what they're looking at

00:05:07.760 is something that makes it a lot better.

00:05:10.840 Right?

00:05:12.300 Because I don't think they're saying

00:05:14.080 that we think if you take this vaccination,

00:05:16.480 you'll never get Alzheimer's.

00:05:18.620 I think they're saying if you get the vaccination,

00:05:20.820 it might not affect you as much.

00:05:23.460 So you've noticed that the definition of a vaccination

00:05:26.200 has just completely changed.

00:05:28.200 Now, vaccination and therapeutic

00:05:29.980 are basically the same thing.

00:05:32.320 At this point, what makes it a vaccination

00:05:34.260 is that they give it to you in a shot.

00:05:37.920 Am I wrong?

00:05:39.380 I think at this point,

00:05:40.480 we're going to call anything in a shot

00:05:42.320 a vaccination,

00:05:44.060 if it helps at all.

00:05:46.580 So I don't know if that's meaningful or not,

00:05:49.480 but words have just started to drift in meaning,

00:05:53.480 maybe more than usual.

00:05:55.340 Here's the funniest comment

00:05:56.480 on this Alzheimer vaccination article

00:05:58.980 from James Feffery.

00:06:02.820 Or Pefeffery.

00:06:04.260 I don't know how to...

00:06:05.740 His last name starts with PF.

00:06:09.020 Which one is silent?

00:06:10.220 The F or the P?

00:06:10.920 P-F-E-F-F-E-R-L-E.

00:06:17.380 Pfefferly?

00:06:19.940 Pfefferly?

00:06:20.960 Well, anyway, James Pfefferly

00:06:23.440 says that about the Alzheimer vaccination,

00:06:27.900 Biden gets his mind back.

00:06:29.440 Hilarity soon follows.

00:06:31.760 I did what?

00:06:32.720 This is a pretty funny comment.

00:06:38.460 You can imagine Biden getting the shot

00:06:41.140 two years from now or something.

00:06:43.580 He gets the shot,

00:06:44.860 and you see Biden sitting there,

00:06:45.980 he gets the shot,

00:06:46.660 and he goes,

00:06:48.100 wait, I did what?

00:06:53.740 Now, if I've taught you,

00:06:57.280 and I think I've taught many of you

00:06:58.800 how to write jokes, right?

00:07:00.180 How many of you have seen any of my tutorials

00:07:02.140 about writing humor?

00:07:03.840 I guess most of them have been

00:07:04.960 on the locals' platform,

00:07:06.320 so I don't think the YouTubers have seen them.

00:07:08.600 But one of the tricks of writing humor

00:07:10.200 is that you create a situation

00:07:12.480 where people can fill out

00:07:14.880 the punchline in their mind.

00:07:17.140 So you give them the boost,

00:07:18.560 you know, the little,

00:07:19.700 you know, imagining Biden saying,

00:07:21.840 quote, I did what?

00:07:23.700 But the beauty of that punchline

00:07:25.460 is that it makes you imagine

00:07:27.660 the full scene, right?

00:07:29.800 So the scene that you put in there

00:07:31.420 is in your own mind.

00:07:32.340 It's not in the joke.

00:07:33.980 The joke is just this one line.

00:07:35.400 I did what?

00:07:35.980 And then you just imagine

00:07:37.040 the fullness of the scene.

00:07:38.440 That is a good joke.

00:07:41.760 Right?

00:07:42.080 You can't beat that form of humor

00:07:43.920 where somebody has to recreate

00:07:45.580 the details in their head

00:07:46.580 from your punchline.

00:07:47.340 So there's your humor writing trick

00:07:51.320 for the day.

00:07:52.860 I'd like to get into

00:07:54.000 a little bit of swearing next.

00:07:58.320 Have you heard of a book

00:07:59.900 called White Fragility?

00:08:03.600 White Fragility?

00:08:04.960 And you've heard the term, right?

00:08:06.040 White Fragility.

00:08:07.960 I think it has to do with, you know,

00:08:09.440 white people feeling bad

00:08:10.840 if anybody else gets some good stuff.

00:08:14.080 Something like that.

00:08:14.700 You know that's racist, right?

00:08:20.540 White Fragility.

00:08:21.820 You couldn't say that

00:08:22.540 about anybody else.

00:08:24.120 That's purely racist.

00:08:26.420 It's not even a little bit racist.

00:08:28.880 This is like the old school,

00:08:30.680 you know,

00:08:30.920 no systemic anything here.

00:08:33.240 Direct racism.

00:08:36.080 Well, apparently,

00:08:37.180 since we haven't,

00:08:38.260 we meaning anybody

00:08:39.700 anybody who doesn't like that

00:08:41.680 has not pushed back on that.

00:08:44.480 I got a comment today

00:08:45.980 on Twitter.

00:08:48.100 It doesn't even matter

00:08:49.260 what the topic was.

00:08:50.580 But the comment to me

00:08:52.040 was that

00:08:52.780 white eggs

00:08:54.560 have the softest shells.

00:08:57.980 It was a comment

00:08:58.960 about my

00:08:59.820 ethnicity

00:09:01.960 and a suggestion

00:09:04.420 that I'm

00:09:05.200 extra sensitive

00:09:06.580 because I'm white.

00:09:10.120 So I responded back,

00:09:12.680 you racist

00:09:13.340 piece of shit.

00:09:15.280 You know,

00:09:16.160 I don't know

00:09:17.660 what too far

00:09:18.640 looks like.

00:09:20.440 Right?

00:09:20.880 You know that

00:09:21.320 I identify as black

00:09:22.520 because I've been

00:09:23.360 discriminated against

00:09:24.460 so severely

00:09:25.260 in my life.

00:09:26.380 That's not a joke.

00:09:27.280 If anybody's new to me,

00:09:29.360 none of that's a joke.

00:09:30.300 I literally identify

00:09:32.020 as black

00:09:32.620 because I can.

00:09:33.440 Those are the rules.

00:09:35.260 The rules are

00:09:36.120 I can identify

00:09:36.940 anyone I want

00:09:37.820 and that's who

00:09:38.280 I identify with the most.

00:09:39.560 And also,

00:09:40.000 I like to be

00:09:40.400 on the winning team.

00:09:43.080 If I have a choice

00:09:44.400 of being on the winning team

00:09:46.440 or the losing team,

00:09:47.540 why would you pick

00:09:49.000 the losing team?

00:09:50.400 So I pick

00:09:50.920 the winning team.

00:09:52.480 I think black Americans

00:09:53.720 are ascending,

00:09:54.660 white Americans

00:09:55.240 are descending,

00:09:56.360 and I like to get

00:09:57.340 some of those benefits.

00:09:58.320 I'm allowed.

00:10:01.060 The rules allow me

00:10:02.320 to do that,

00:10:02.920 so I'd like to get

00:10:03.560 some of those benefits.

00:10:05.420 And you should too

00:10:06.400 because it's available

00:10:07.440 to everybody

00:10:08.060 and nobody is excluded

00:10:09.820 from defining

00:10:10.880 their own situation.

00:10:14.640 But I would like

00:10:16.720 to say this

00:10:17.360 to all the people

00:10:18.320 who would like

00:10:19.060 to get away

00:10:19.920 with calling

00:10:20.400 white people

00:10:21.040 who I don't identify with,

00:10:22.720 but I still support

00:10:23.820 their struggle.

00:10:25.640 When you say

00:10:28.880 white eggs

00:10:29.460 are the softest shells,

00:10:30.760 fuck you.

00:10:32.120 Fuck you.

00:10:33.680 Fuck your family.

00:10:35.900 Fuck you.

00:10:36.840 Every article,

00:10:37.920 every particle

00:10:38.620 in your fucking

00:10:39.700 racist piece

00:10:40.600 of shit body.

00:10:42.300 Fuck you completely.

00:10:44.480 Drop dead.

00:10:46.100 All right?

00:10:46.500 If you can go

00:10:47.480 in public

00:10:48.080 and say racist bullshit

00:10:50.140 directly,

00:10:51.440 not even hinting at it,

00:10:53.380 fuck you.

00:10:54.300 And if you want

00:10:55.620 to see how

00:10:56.460 fragile

00:10:59.080 my shell is,

00:11:02.140 don't fucking push me

00:11:05.360 because you're

00:11:06.400 going to find out.

00:11:08.400 So anytime you see this,

00:11:10.680 you know,

00:11:11.180 the white fragility

00:11:12.440 and, you know,

00:11:13.920 white people

00:11:14.380 are sensitive

00:11:14.920 and even the Karen stuff.

00:11:16.920 By the way,

00:11:17.520 I think white people

00:11:18.300 should be able

00:11:18.860 to call white women

00:11:20.520 Karens.

00:11:22.160 Nobody else.

00:11:24.300 Nobody else.

00:11:26.340 Who's with me?

00:11:27.840 And again,

00:11:28.300 I don't identify

00:11:29.500 as a white person,

00:11:30.420 so I'm just supporting

00:11:31.880 the struggle

00:11:32.760 of the people

00:11:33.380 who are.

00:11:35.200 I'm going to start

00:11:35.980 using the N-word.

00:11:37.960 I'm going to start

00:11:38.720 using the N-word

00:11:39.440 because, first of all,

00:11:40.460 I identify as black.

00:11:42.020 But secondly,

00:11:42.980 if white women

00:11:45.080 can be called Karens,

00:11:47.440 and that's okay

00:11:48.100 with everybody,

00:11:49.300 everybody's okay

00:11:49.980 with that,

00:11:50.380 don't push it.

00:11:54.580 Now,

00:11:55.040 I've been very much

00:11:55.920 in favor of the N-word

00:11:57.040 being excluded

00:11:58.260 from civilized society.

00:12:01.120 It's a horrible word.

00:12:02.940 It should be banned forever.

00:12:04.940 Now,

00:12:05.160 of course,

00:12:05.680 you know,

00:12:05.900 free speech,

00:12:06.500 of course,

00:12:06.780 can't ban it.

00:12:08.020 But in terms of

00:12:09.120 what feels right

00:12:10.260 as, you know,

00:12:11.020 a human being,

00:12:12.260 like,

00:12:12.520 I don't ever want

00:12:13.160 to hear that word.

00:12:16.040 So I'm okay

00:12:16.920 with that

00:12:17.200 as an exception,

00:12:18.220 right?

00:12:18.440 It's like a minor exception.

00:12:21.280 But I feel like

00:12:22.960 there's a little bit

00:12:24.160 of taking advantage

00:12:25.000 going on here,

00:12:26.000 don't you think?

00:12:28.080 So,

00:12:28.900 for those of you

00:12:29.900 who'd like to call

00:12:30.660 white people Karens

00:12:31.940 and fragile,

00:12:33.060 fuck you,

00:12:33.680 you pieces of racist shit.

00:12:37.680 Moving on.

00:12:40.360 Biden's slogan,

00:12:41.560 Build Back Better,

00:12:43.920 there was an observation

00:12:46.240 by Spike Cohen

00:12:47.480 on Twitter

00:12:48.820 who makes this observation.

00:12:51.700 So Build Back Better.

00:12:53.880 Build,

00:12:54.480 what would be

00:12:54.900 another word for build?

00:12:56.600 To build something.

00:12:58.260 Make, right?

00:12:59.200 You make something

00:13:00.000 or you build it.

00:13:01.420 Kind of similar.

00:13:03.040 What would be

00:13:03.780 another word for back

00:13:05.580 as it's used in this?

00:13:06.820 We're not talking

00:13:07.460 about the back

00:13:08.020 on your body,

00:13:09.220 but back in this context

00:13:10.840 means historically back.

00:13:13.940 You know,

00:13:14.160 to take us back

00:13:15.160 to something.

00:13:16.940 Sort of like again.

00:13:19.280 Yeah,

00:13:19.620 it's sort of like again.

00:13:21.440 We'll do back.

00:13:22.780 It's like again.

00:13:24.360 And then better,

00:13:26.520 what would be

00:13:26.980 another word for better?

00:13:30.260 Sort of a synonym

00:13:31.480 for better.

00:13:32.640 Oh, great.

00:13:33.800 If you did something

00:13:34.760 better than it was,

00:13:35.800 it's probably great.

00:13:36.540 So literally,

00:13:39.400 Build Back Better

00:13:40.060 is just make

00:13:41.060 America great again.

00:13:46.120 I mean,

00:13:46.700 it leaves out

00:13:47.100 the America part

00:13:47.920 because the Dems

00:13:48.880 don't like America

00:13:49.880 as much.

00:13:50.980 But

00:13:51.220 all it is

00:13:53.280 is just a copy of,

00:13:54.820 it's literally

00:13:55.340 just a copy of

00:13:56.520 Make America Great Again.

00:13:58.420 They just changed

00:13:58.980 the words.

00:14:00.060 And somehow

00:14:00.560 I didn't notice.

00:14:01.340 How did I go

00:14:03.400 this long

00:14:03.880 without noticing

00:14:04.640 that it's just

00:14:05.640 it's just MAGA?

00:14:07.680 How did we do that?

00:14:09.100 Did any of you

00:14:09.660 notice before this?

00:14:11.440 How in the world

00:14:12.400 did we not notice this?

00:14:15.000 Isn't that freaky?

00:14:18.240 It's freaky.

00:14:19.660 Like,

00:14:19.880 it's my job

00:14:20.600 to notice this stuff,

00:14:21.880 right?

00:14:22.100 Because I'm a word guy.

00:14:23.980 It's literally

00:14:24.680 my job to notice.

00:14:25.680 I didn't see it.

00:14:27.260 So good,

00:14:27.860 good observation,

00:14:29.060 Spike Cohen.

00:14:29.840 All right,

00:14:32.980 because I'm

00:14:33.700 fair and balanced,

00:14:34.960 I will tell you

00:14:35.660 the fake news

00:14:36.340 on CNN,

00:14:37.640 but I will also

00:14:38.720 tell you the fake news

00:14:39.660 on Fox News.

00:14:41.480 Do you think

00:14:42.280 that Fox News

00:14:42.980 ever has any fake news?

00:14:46.760 Well,

00:14:47.440 you be the judge.

00:14:48.960 So here's

00:14:49.520 a Fox News headline.

00:14:52.180 So,

00:14:52.780 first of all,

00:14:53.320 some background.

00:14:54.260 So Kamala Harris

00:14:55.060 appeared at an event

00:14:56.320 with Biden

00:14:56.960 and

00:14:57.540 some other

00:14:59.580 person was introduced

00:15:00.780 as Kamala Harris

00:15:02.560 goes to the lectern.

00:15:04.760 So Kamala

00:15:05.340 walks up to the lectern

00:15:06.900 and then the voice

00:15:08.660 of God,

00:15:09.240 you know,

00:15:09.460 the announcer says,

00:15:11.480 introducing,

00:15:12.740 and then it was

00:15:13.220 just some other person

00:15:14.100 that they were going

00:15:15.300 to introduce after her.

00:15:17.200 Now,

00:15:18.880 I saw Kamala Harris

00:15:20.020 getting mocked

00:15:20.720 by the conservatives

00:15:21.880 for,

00:15:22.540 you know,

00:15:23.140 being dissed

00:15:24.500 and being,

00:15:25.500 you know,

00:15:25.800 in this awkward situation.

00:15:27.020 But I had a completely

00:15:28.740 different take on it.

00:15:30.640 And I'm not sure why.

00:15:31.620 I mean,

00:15:31.840 obviously it's subjective.

00:15:33.560 But my take on it

00:15:34.640 is that she handled it perfectly.

00:15:36.600 Actually,

00:15:37.040 one of the best things

00:15:37.800 I've seen her do in public.

00:15:40.660 Do you disagree?

00:15:42.260 Here's what I saw.

00:15:43.560 So,

00:15:43.940 she didn't create

00:15:45.020 the situation,

00:15:45.860 right?

00:15:46.340 She was cast

00:15:47.240 into the situation.

00:15:48.580 She gets up there,

00:15:49.400 she's ready to talk,

00:15:50.340 and then the voice

00:15:50.980 introduces a different person.

00:15:52.460 Instead of looking shook up,

00:15:56.620 she smiled,

00:15:58.340 and here's a little

00:15:59.620 public speaking tip for you.

00:16:02.740 The pause.

00:16:04.740 The pause.

00:16:06.460 There is nothing harder

00:16:08.060 than pausing for two seconds

00:16:11.480 when something like that happens.

00:16:13.840 Because the pause

00:16:14.800 gives you time to think.

00:16:16.660 But you don't give yourself

00:16:18.380 that pause

00:16:18.980 when you're in front of a crowd.

00:16:20.560 Usually you just start talking,

00:16:21.720 and something silly comes out.

00:16:23.820 But she paused.

00:16:25.720 Now,

00:16:26.060 that's the first time

00:16:27.280 I've seen poise

00:16:30.160 of the professional kind

00:16:33.220 that you'd expect

00:16:33.800 from a top-level politician.

00:16:36.560 She paused,

00:16:38.520 and then what was her,

00:16:40.400 then her quote was,

00:16:41.560 she goes,

00:16:42.200 she smiles and she goes,

00:16:43.660 in a moment.

00:16:45.360 And then she goes on

00:16:46.360 with the thing.

00:16:47.900 It was kind of perfect.

00:16:49.820 Kind of perfect.

00:16:51.140 Right?

00:16:51.280 Now,

00:16:51.720 if you're not familiar

00:16:53.900 with my commentary,

00:16:56.760 I've been just brutal

00:16:58.780 about Kamala Harris's

00:17:00.880 public persona.

00:17:02.780 It's just so cringey.

00:17:04.240 Just horrible,

00:17:05.200 most of the time.

00:17:05.800 Worst I've ever seen,

00:17:06.760 honestly.

00:17:07.480 It's honestly the worst

00:17:08.420 I've ever seen.

00:17:09.340 But in this moment,

00:17:10.840 I thought she handled it

00:17:12.720 as well as that could be handled.

00:17:14.840 I don't think that could have been better.

00:17:15.920 Anyway,

00:17:18.200 here's how Fox News

00:17:19.300 writes about it.

00:17:22.100 Now,

00:17:22.360 you should also know

00:17:23.080 that CNN had a

00:17:24.300 really critical report

00:17:26.360 of Kamala Harris yesterday.

00:17:28.020 All right?

00:17:28.280 So,

00:17:28.920 that's your background.

00:17:30.360 Here's Fox News headline.

00:17:32.300 White House announcer

00:17:33.140 appears to skip

00:17:34.520 Kamala Harris

00:17:35.420 at infrastructure bill signing

00:17:37.460 after disastrous

00:17:38.980 CNN report.

00:17:39.920 So,

00:17:41.440 the White House announcer

00:17:42.240 appears to skip her

00:17:43.600 after the disastrous

00:17:45.520 CNN report.

00:17:47.760 Do you think

00:17:48.740 that these things

00:17:49.600 are connected?

00:17:51.040 Do you think

00:17:51.620 there's a connection

00:17:52.380 between the CNN report

00:17:53.780 and the White House

00:17:55.360 announcer skipping her?

00:17:57.600 No.

00:17:58.900 No.

00:17:59.780 There's no connection.

00:18:01.800 And then you get

00:18:03.160 to the bottom

00:18:03.660 of the article

00:18:04.220 and it even says,

00:18:05.840 well,

00:18:05.980 there's probably

00:18:06.300 no connection.

00:18:07.600 It's probably

00:18:08.080 just a mistake

00:18:08.900 in the announcer

00:18:10.360 and there's nothing

00:18:10.960 else there.

00:18:11.940 So,

00:18:12.340 they write this whole

00:18:13.020 fake news headline

00:18:14.940 to make you think

00:18:15.880 that maybe

00:18:16.320 the White House

00:18:17.000 has turned against

00:18:17.860 Kamala Harris

00:18:18.560 so much

00:18:19.740 that they're not even

00:18:20.960 going to introduce

00:18:21.660 her right.

00:18:23.240 That didn't happen.

00:18:25.180 Nothing like that

00:18:26.080 happened.

00:18:27.120 The headline

00:18:27.640 is pure fake news.

00:18:29.880 And if they cover

00:18:30.800 this accurately,

00:18:32.480 they'd say

00:18:32.840 the announcer

00:18:33.380 made a mistake

00:18:34.180 and Harris

00:18:35.540 adeptly

00:18:37.260 handled it.

00:18:38.900 That should have

00:18:40.060 been the news.

00:18:41.420 The news should have

00:18:42.180 been the announcer

00:18:42.780 made a mistake

00:18:43.440 and the Vice

00:18:45.480 President adeptly,

00:18:46.940 adeptly

00:18:48.000 handled it.

00:18:50.260 Now,

00:18:51.360 I saw a tweet

00:18:53.100 from Ed Latimer

00:18:54.960 the other day

00:18:55.860 about steel man

00:18:57.880 arguments.

00:19:00.140 And a steel man

00:19:01.080 argument is when

00:19:01.920 you argue the

00:19:03.080 other side

00:19:04.040 as convincingly

00:19:05.740 as possible

00:19:06.340 before you give

00:19:07.600 your counterpoint.

00:19:09.540 So if you can't

00:19:10.240 describe the other

00:19:11.100 side's argument

00:19:11.940 perfectly,

00:19:13.740 your debate

00:19:14.840 against it

00:19:15.400 really is weak

00:19:16.440 because you're not

00:19:17.300 even debating

00:19:18.040 the right thing.

00:19:19.040 You're debating

00:19:19.560 a straw man.

00:19:20.920 So if you can't

00:19:22.300 say something good

00:19:23.860 legitimately

00:19:25.240 about the other

00:19:26.860 team,

00:19:27.960 nobody should

00:19:28.560 take you seriously.

00:19:29.500 I won't.

00:19:32.300 If I see you

00:19:33.200 say nothing good

00:19:34.000 about the other

00:19:34.500 side ever,

00:19:35.360 I don't take you

00:19:36.160 seriously.

00:19:37.660 Just know that.

00:19:39.360 Just know that I

00:19:40.200 will never take you

00:19:41.040 seriously if you

00:19:41.960 can't say something

00:19:42.980 good about the

00:19:44.320 other side.

00:19:45.420 Something.

00:19:46.280 Because there's

00:19:46.780 always something,

00:19:48.020 right?

00:19:48.840 If you can't say

00:19:49.620 anything good,

00:19:50.980 you're probably an NPC.

00:19:52.280 All right.

00:19:54.420 So that was my

00:19:56.260 saying something

00:19:56.840 good about Harris.

00:19:57.780 So the next time

00:19:58.460 I criticize her,

00:19:59.540 you should put

00:20:00.000 that in context.

00:20:01.440 And I will.

00:20:03.940 Here's a question

00:20:04.740 for you.

00:20:05.540 Name a Biden

00:20:06.200 success,

00:20:07.500 and you know,

00:20:08.060 success is

00:20:08.700 subjective,

00:20:09.620 right?

00:20:10.180 But name a Biden

00:20:11.140 success as president

00:20:12.180 that wouldn't have

00:20:13.700 happened anyway,

00:20:14.820 just on its own,

00:20:15.800 no matter who

00:20:16.480 was president.

00:20:17.820 Name something

00:20:18.300 he did that

00:20:19.040 wouldn't have

00:20:19.420 happened just

00:20:20.080 anyway.

00:20:20.420 Would the

00:20:21.960 stock market

00:20:22.600 have gone up?

00:20:25.120 Probably.

00:20:26.600 Probably.

00:20:28.080 Now, I gave

00:20:28.860 Trump credit

00:20:31.100 for the stock

00:20:31.680 market because

00:20:32.320 he cut taxes

00:20:33.200 or was planning

00:20:33.860 to cut taxes

00:20:34.580 and then did.

00:20:35.760 And he also

00:20:36.700 directly talked

00:20:37.700 it up,

00:20:38.700 which is actually

00:20:39.900 good technique

00:20:40.680 because stock

00:20:41.360 markets and

00:20:42.400 the economy

00:20:42.880 itself work on

00:20:43.960 persuasion and

00:20:45.620 psychology.

00:20:47.500 So there was

00:20:48.020 a reason that

00:20:49.900 you could quite

00:20:50.540 see,

00:20:51.120 you could see

00:20:51.500 the connection.

00:20:52.700 Trump did

00:20:53.240 X,

00:20:53.880 the stock

00:20:54.320 market,

00:20:54.860 you know,

00:20:55.440 responded.

00:20:56.720 So in that

00:20:57.380 case,

00:20:57.660 I think you

00:20:58.120 could say

00:20:58.540 Trump gets

00:20:59.440 some of the

00:21:00.180 credit,

00:21:00.940 but maybe

00:21:01.240 not all of

00:21:01.800 it,

00:21:02.040 right?

00:21:02.700 Because the

00:21:03.280 economy tends

00:21:04.060 to go up

00:21:04.580 over time.

00:21:06.160 But I don't

00:21:06.820 see anything

00:21:07.440 that Biden

00:21:07.900 did that

00:21:08.320 would be

00:21:08.560 good for

00:21:08.860 the stock

00:21:09.280 market,

00:21:09.720 did you?

00:21:10.680 What would

00:21:11.220 be the

00:21:11.520 argument that

00:21:12.220 Biden did

00:21:12.760 something to

00:21:13.260 help the

00:21:13.620 stock market?

00:21:14.680 Anything?

00:21:15.860 The

00:21:16.260 infrastructure bill?

00:21:17.280 Does that

00:21:17.580 help the

00:21:17.960 stock market?

00:21:18.440 I don't

00:21:19.660 know,

00:21:19.860 does it?

00:21:21.420 You're

00:21:21.820 saying

00:21:22.020 infrastructure,

00:21:23.100 but isn't

00:21:23.720 there just

00:21:24.140 as much

00:21:24.520 argument that

00:21:25.220 it hurts

00:21:25.520 the economy

00:21:26.040 because of

00:21:26.780 the spending?

00:21:28.960 I don't

00:21:29.200 know,

00:21:29.480 and that

00:21:29.700 you're

00:21:29.880 spending on

00:21:30.320 the wrong

00:21:30.620 things in

00:21:31.120 some cases.

00:21:32.340 So okay,

00:21:32.880 I'll give

00:21:33.200 you that.

00:21:34.540 I'll give

00:21:35.140 you infrastructure,

00:21:36.140 but here's the

00:21:36.740 second point.

00:21:37.840 Don't you

00:21:38.280 think the

00:21:38.620 infrastructure deal

00:21:39.520 would have

00:21:39.820 happened anyway?

00:21:41.620 I do.

00:21:42.940 See,

00:21:43.220 I think

00:21:43.460 Congress kicked

00:21:44.240 that can down

00:21:44.940 the road as

00:21:45.460 long as they

00:21:45.900 can kick it,

00:21:46.580 and then

00:21:46.880 something was

00:21:47.560 going to

00:21:47.800 happen.

00:21:49.060 Now,

00:21:49.580 of course,

00:21:50.220 they needed

00:21:50.620 the Democratic

00:21:52.620 majority,

00:21:54.080 but they also

00:21:54.520 needed some

00:21:55.060 Republicans to

00:21:56.040 cross the

00:21:57.420 line.

00:21:57.660 I feel like

00:21:58.840 that just

00:21:59.260 would have

00:21:59.580 happened anyway,

00:22:00.900 because you

00:22:01.180 can't go

00:22:02.660 forever without

00:22:03.560 doing a bill

00:22:04.320 on the most

00:22:05.620 important things

00:22:06.260 in the country.

00:22:07.520 Congress just

00:22:08.300 can't go

00:22:08.740 forever.

00:22:09.800 They've got to

00:22:10.240 do it someday,

00:22:11.640 so it just

00:22:12.340 happened now.

00:22:13.500 How about the

00:22:14.020 employment numbers?

00:22:14.960 I don't think

00:22:16.220 Biden had

00:22:16.660 anything to

00:22:17.160 do with

00:22:17.420 that,

00:22:18.340 so that

00:22:18.780 probably would

00:22:19.320 have been

00:22:19.500 fine.

00:22:20.140 How about

00:22:20.460 vaccinations?

00:22:22.180 I don't

00:22:22.540 know.

00:22:23.480 Are they

00:22:23.940 better or

00:22:24.540 worse?

00:22:25.440 Has Biden

00:22:26.180 handled the

00:22:26.860 pandemic better

00:22:28.240 or worse than

00:22:28.900 Trump?

00:22:29.300 Who knows?

00:22:31.140 How about

00:22:31.920 Afghan pull-out?

00:22:33.780 It was literally

00:22:34.420 scheduled under

00:22:35.280 Trump's

00:22:35.680 administration.

00:22:37.140 We imagine

00:22:37.980 Trump would

00:22:38.500 have done

00:22:38.760 better, but we

00:22:39.400 don't know.

00:22:41.260 So as far as

00:22:42.380 I can tell,

00:22:42.940 there's nothing

00:22:43.500 really here

00:22:45.920 except you

00:22:46.560 could make an

00:22:47.080 argument for

00:22:47.620 the infrastructure

00:22:48.280 bill, but I

00:22:49.080 think it would

00:22:49.500 have happened

00:22:49.860 anyway.

00:22:51.600 Now, do the

00:22:52.520 same thing

00:22:52.960 with Trump.

00:22:54.580 Did Trump

00:22:55.340 accomplish

00:22:55.980 anything that

00:22:56.920 you say,

00:22:57.340 well, that was

00:22:57.820 going to happen

00:22:58.280 anyway, no

00:22:59.520 matter who was

00:23:00.100 in charge?

00:23:00.980 So Trump was

00:23:01.980 tough on the

00:23:02.580 border.

00:23:03.540 Was that going

00:23:04.040 to happen

00:23:04.360 anyway?

00:23:05.200 No, no, it

00:23:06.100 wasn't going to

00:23:06.520 happen anyway.

00:23:07.520 That was something

00:23:08.000 he did that

00:23:08.680 nobody else was

00:23:09.280 going to do.

00:23:10.580 How about

00:23:11.340 Trump basically

00:23:13.960 calming down

00:23:15.000 the problems

00:23:15.540 with North

00:23:16.040 Korea?

00:23:17.820 Was Biden

00:23:18.680 going to do

00:23:19.060 that?

00:23:19.960 No.

00:23:20.540 There was no

00:23:20.920 chance Biden

00:23:21.640 was going to

00:23:22.200 have a personal

00:23:23.260 relationship with

00:23:24.200 Kim Jong-un,

00:23:24.900 which would

00:23:25.280 effectively change

00:23:26.360 the entire

00:23:26.880 security situation.

00:23:29.220 No.

00:23:29.680 And I feel

00:23:30.360 like I could

00:23:30.880 go through

00:23:31.320 example after

00:23:32.220 example of

00:23:33.520 something that

00:23:34.120 Trump accomplished

00:23:35.060 that you

00:23:36.120 couldn't really

00:23:36.680 imagine somebody

00:23:37.440 else doing.

00:23:37.940 that, my

00:23:39.720 friends, is

00:23:41.600 why I

00:23:42.420 supported him.

00:23:44.060 Not because

00:23:45.080 everything he

00:23:45.920 does is better

00:23:46.600 than everything

00:23:47.180 anybody else

00:23:47.880 does.

00:23:48.400 I've never

00:23:48.800 believed that.

00:23:50.560 What I believe

00:23:51.420 is that sometimes

00:23:52.100 you need a

00:23:52.720 disruptor and

00:23:54.560 it's just good

00:23:55.060 for the system.

00:23:55.940 Could have

00:23:56.280 been a

00:23:56.520 Democrat,

00:23:57.680 depending on

00:23:58.340 the type of

00:23:58.820 disruption.

00:23:59.920 But sometimes

00:24:00.500 you need

00:24:00.800 somebody to

00:24:01.160 just go and

00:24:01.580 break shit.

00:24:03.120 Just go break

00:24:04.400 everything and

00:24:05.440 then put it

00:24:06.020 back together.

00:24:07.200 Better.

00:24:08.140 Build it back

00:24:08.620 better.

00:24:10.120 So I got

00:24:11.160 what I wanted

00:24:11.840 out of Trump.

00:24:12.820 Of course,

00:24:13.180 I did not

00:24:13.660 anticipate the

00:24:14.480 degree of

00:24:15.320 animosity that

00:24:16.320 would be

00:24:17.040 generated.

00:24:17.900 I'm not sure

00:24:18.380 anybody did,

00:24:19.900 which is

00:24:20.780 certainly a

00:24:21.340 negative.

00:24:23.460 All right,

00:24:23.920 let's talk about

00:24:24.420 the Rittenhouse

00:24:24.920 prosecution.

00:24:27.020 Is there any

00:24:27.540 update on that

00:24:28.340 since I started?

00:24:29.940 I thought they

00:24:30.680 were done with

00:24:31.140 the closing

00:24:31.680 arguments.

00:24:32.440 Are they not

00:24:32.860 done with them?

00:24:33.320 I saw a

00:24:34.460 headline that

00:24:35.120 says maybe

00:24:35.540 they were

00:24:35.780 continuing with

00:24:36.560 them.

00:24:38.060 Have we

00:24:38.580 gone to

00:24:38.920 jury yet?

00:24:41.440 Can somebody

00:24:42.120 give me an

00:24:42.620 update?

00:24:43.160 Have they

00:24:43.460 gone to

00:24:43.920 the jury

00:24:44.380 yet?

00:24:46.000 Oh, yes,

00:24:46.780 they have

00:24:47.020 gone.

00:24:47.400 Oh, it's

00:24:47.680 with the

00:24:47.980 jury.

00:24:49.040 Okay, let's

00:24:49.960 talk about

00:24:50.320 this.

00:24:51.780 So the

00:24:52.460 Rittenhouse

00:24:53.080 defense, or

00:24:54.080 I'm sorry,

00:24:54.480 the prosecution

00:24:55.280 has put on

00:24:57.320 a good

00:24:57.580 defense.

00:24:58.480 Now, everybody

00:24:58.980 is saying

00:24:59.320 that, so

00:24:59.680 that's not

00:25:00.000 my clever

00:25:00.540 idea, but

00:25:01.660 it's certainly

00:25:02.080 true.

00:25:02.520 If you

00:25:03.380 look at

00:25:03.740 it, it

00:25:04.020 looks like

00:25:04.480 the prosecution

00:25:05.320 argued the

00:25:07.000 defense's case.

00:25:08.880 But here are

00:25:09.360 some of the

00:25:09.680 crazy things

00:25:10.360 they said in

00:25:11.180 closing, that

00:25:13.100 you don't have

00:25:13.580 a right to

00:25:14.000 self-defense if

00:25:14.820 you're the

00:25:15.120 one with

00:25:15.420 the gun.

00:25:17.580 What?

00:25:19.540 That's just

00:25:20.160 not true.

00:25:21.400 You know, as

00:25:21.880 legal scholars

00:25:22.760 and basically

00:25:23.460 anybody with a

00:25:24.160 brain has

00:25:25.300 told you,

00:25:26.180 now, if the

00:25:26.760 other person

00:25:27.280 is going to

00:25:27.760 kill you one

00:25:28.380 way or the

00:25:28.780 other, yeah,

00:25:29.960 you can shoot

00:25:30.580 them.

00:25:31.780 Shoot away.

00:25:32.520 And then

00:25:34.100 one of the

00:25:35.880 prosecutors in

00:25:36.720 the closing

00:25:37.120 statement said,

00:25:38.300 you know,

00:25:38.640 sometimes we

00:25:39.260 all have to

00:25:39.700 take a

00:25:40.040 beating.

00:25:41.620 What?

00:25:42.640 Sometimes we

00:25:43.460 all have to

00:25:44.020 take a

00:25:44.900 beating.

00:25:48.480 Sometimes we

00:25:49.320 have to punch

00:25:49.780 things.

00:25:50.300 That's true.

00:25:52.660 But it

00:25:55.120 may be true

00:25:55.700 that sometimes

00:25:56.360 people get

00:25:57.200 beatings, but

00:25:58.900 you don't have

00:25:59.460 to take one.

00:26:00.040 If I could

00:26:01.560 give you some

00:26:02.120 advice, if

00:26:03.100 you have a

00:26:03.420 gun and

00:26:03.800 somebody's

00:26:04.280 beating you

00:26:04.960 viciously,

00:26:06.560 shoot them.

00:26:07.860 That would

00:26:08.240 be my

00:26:08.580 advice.

00:26:10.340 And then

00:26:10.940 there was

00:26:11.280 the judge

00:26:12.300 instructions.

00:26:13.540 So here,

00:26:14.080 the judge

00:26:14.640 was, here's

00:26:17.120 my take on

00:26:18.920 the judge's

00:26:19.460 instructions.

00:26:20.020 I don't think

00:26:20.780 you're going to

00:26:21.180 see this take

00:26:21.860 anywhere else.

00:26:23.200 So I want

00:26:23.820 to see if I

00:26:24.260 can convince

00:26:24.840 you that my

00:26:25.320 take is right.

00:26:26.000 Are you ready?

00:26:26.280 All right, so

00:26:27.860 I don't think

00:26:28.500 you've seen

00:26:28.860 this, but I

00:26:29.460 haven't heard

00:26:29.840 every pundit,

00:26:30.560 so maybe

00:26:30.880 somebody's on

00:26:31.480 the same

00:26:31.760 point.

00:26:32.760 So the

00:26:33.140 judge was

00:26:33.540 giving the

00:26:34.200 instructions to

00:26:35.500 the jury and

00:26:36.920 started out by

00:26:37.660 saying that if

00:26:38.820 you find the

00:26:39.500 defendant guilty

00:26:40.180 of the top

00:26:41.160 charge, the

00:26:42.200 most aggressive

00:26:43.100 one, then you

00:26:44.440 don't need to

00:26:45.220 continue because

00:26:46.280 the lesser

00:26:46.780 charges are

00:26:47.480 lesser.

00:26:48.560 So if you

00:26:48.940 find the top

00:26:49.520 charge is

00:26:50.120 valid, you're

00:26:51.020 done.

00:26:52.400 Then he said,

00:26:53.820 but if you

00:26:55.860 find that the

00:26:56.460 top charge is

00:26:57.300 not valid, and

00:26:59.600 you find, here's

00:27:00.320 the key, here's

00:27:01.080 the key phrase, and

00:27:02.600 you find that he

00:27:03.340 acted in self

00:27:04.160 defense, then the

00:27:06.160 judge stopped

00:27:06.720 himself, and he

00:27:08.980 couldn't go on.

00:27:10.760 And he realized he

00:27:11.900 talked himself into

00:27:13.080 a trap, which he

00:27:15.320 admitted.

00:27:15.860 He said, I think I

00:27:16.780 talked myself into

00:27:17.560 a trap.

00:27:18.000 He said it

00:27:18.480 differently, but he

00:27:19.700 admitted he talked

00:27:20.460 himself into a

00:27:21.240 trap.

00:27:21.800 What was the

00:27:22.300 trap?

00:27:23.940 What was the

00:27:24.480 trap?

00:27:25.860 What was the

00:27:26.940 judge realizing he

00:27:28.200 had just done?

00:27:34.860 I think what he

00:27:35.900 had just done is

00:27:37.740 basically told

00:27:40.740 them that if it

00:27:41.560 looked like self

00:27:42.240 defense, there was

00:27:42.960 nothing else to

00:27:43.620 think about.

00:27:45.400 Now, he didn't

00:27:46.120 say that, but it

00:27:48.360 was pretty close to

00:27:49.340 sounding like that.

00:27:50.940 If you thought it

00:27:52.260 was self defense,

00:27:53.100 you're sort of

00:27:53.560 done here.

00:27:53.980 Now, I don't

00:27:55.640 think he meant

00:27:56.180 to say that,

00:27:56.860 right?

00:27:58.160 But it's true.

00:28:05.400 It's true.

00:28:07.500 Meaning that if it

00:28:08.940 looked like self

00:28:09.540 defense, there's

00:28:10.180 really not much

00:28:10.860 else to talk about

00:28:11.600 because the gun

00:28:12.160 charge was thrown

00:28:12.880 out, right?

00:28:13.340 So, I feel as

00:28:16.620 if he biased the

00:28:19.660 jury toward an

00:28:21.020 acquittal in a

00:28:21.780 way that he

00:28:22.240 realized he'd

00:28:22.900 done as he was

00:28:23.600 doing it, and

00:28:24.500 then he tried to

00:28:25.080 back it out.

00:28:26.080 Now, here's the

00:28:26.700 problem.

00:28:28.800 There's no evidence

00:28:29.740 of a crime.

00:28:32.320 So, the judge, in

00:28:33.660 giving his

00:28:34.300 instructions, being

00:28:37.020 completely aware that

00:28:39.120 there's no evidence of

00:28:40.060 a crime at all, was

00:28:42.540 simply being honest.

00:28:44.220 And I think he

00:28:44.700 realized he couldn't

00:28:45.400 be completely honest

00:28:46.480 because he just sat

00:28:48.760 through and presided

00:28:49.740 over a thoroughly

00:28:51.260 corrupt process, which

00:28:53.620 I think is going to

00:28:54.320 give us the right

00:28:55.360 answer.

00:28:56.200 But at least the

00:28:56.820 prosecution part of

00:28:57.740 it was thoroughly

00:28:58.300 corrupt.

00:28:59.800 I mean, I don't know

00:29:00.400 how the prosecutors

00:29:01.140 don't go to jail.

00:29:02.900 Honestly, I don't

00:29:03.780 know.

00:29:04.620 I don't understand the

00:29:06.060 process that the

00:29:07.380 prosecutor doesn't go

00:29:08.420 to jail for this.

00:29:09.980 How do you not go

00:29:10.660 to...

00:29:11.180 Fuck that

00:29:12.000 prosecutor.

00:29:12.640 He belongs in

00:29:13.480 jail.

00:29:17.680 Quality of

00:29:18.360 persuasion of the

00:29:19.120 closing arguments.

00:29:21.700 I didn't watch them

00:29:22.920 enough, but what I

00:29:23.980 did watch looked like

00:29:25.240 none of them were

00:29:26.440 good.

00:29:28.240 So, my take on both

00:29:29.640 the defense and the

00:29:30.700 prosecution is that

00:29:32.280 none of them were

00:29:33.180 especially good at

00:29:34.280 their job.

00:29:35.320 Did you have the

00:29:35.880 same impression?

00:29:37.320 In fact, I would

00:29:38.440 go further.

00:29:40.160 It looked like neither

00:29:41.200 the defense nor the

00:29:42.300 prosecution were even

00:29:43.340 trained in persuasion.

00:29:45.280 Did you see anything

00:29:46.400 that looked like they

00:29:47.160 were trained in

00:29:48.060 persuasion?

00:29:49.380 They're trained in

00:29:50.040 the law, and, you

00:29:51.700 know, there's a little

00:29:52.160 persuasion-y stuff in

00:29:53.260 there, but it doesn't

00:29:54.740 look like they know

00:29:55.460 persuasion.

00:29:57.320 They were just

00:29:58.000 terrible at it.

00:29:58.860 I mean, really

00:29:59.440 terrible.

00:30:00.000 In fact, both the

00:30:00.820 defense and the

00:30:01.800 prosecution kept

00:30:03.360 repeating the other

00:30:04.280 one's case.

00:30:05.140 Now, I know you

00:30:06.600 have to do that for

00:30:07.480 context and stuff, but

00:30:08.880 the way they were

00:30:09.540 doing it, it just

00:30:11.440 seemed like it was

00:30:11.980 reinforcing the other

00:30:12.880 side.

00:30:13.940 I felt like it was

00:30:15.080 terrible in both

00:30:16.360 cases.

00:30:17.040 That was my take.

00:30:24.940 Yeah, and they made

00:30:25.940 it too boring.

00:30:26.620 That's right.

00:30:27.000 So, both sides made

00:30:29.460 their presentations

00:30:30.260 too boring, so there

00:30:31.420 won't be any sticky

00:30:32.220 parts.

00:30:32.620 The secret to

00:30:35.160 having a, you

00:30:37.580 know, good

00:30:37.860 persuasion is that

00:30:40.260 the parts, you

00:30:41.680 have to remember

00:30:42.160 that people are

00:30:42.620 only going to

00:30:42.880 remember 10% of

00:30:43.820 what you say.

00:30:45.380 So you've got to

00:30:46.080 make sure that the

00:30:46.760 10% they remember

00:30:47.760 is really, really

00:30:48.700 important.

00:30:50.240 Right?

00:30:50.620 So I don't think

00:30:51.440 that either side did

00:30:52.700 that.

00:30:53.800 I think they treated

00:30:54.580 it all like it was

00:30:55.320 just one big soup of

00:30:56.640 stuff, and you'd be

00:30:59.220 lucky if you remembered

00:31:00.280 anything in it.

00:31:02.620 Yeah, Johnny

00:31:03.240 Cochran would be the

00:31:04.200 standard for

00:31:05.080 persuasion.

00:31:08.740 I saw a clip of

00:31:10.080 Toobin on CNN saying

00:31:12.380 that the judge's

00:31:13.900 instructions to the

00:31:15.060 jury were all

00:31:16.000 terrible, which sort

00:31:18.120 of sets us up for a

00:31:19.300 riot, doesn't it?

00:31:20.620 Because now we have a

00:31:21.660 reason for thinking it

00:31:23.920 was an illegal trial or

00:31:25.340 illegitimate.

00:31:26.580 And he provided the

00:31:27.520 reason.

00:31:27.720 Well, the jury

00:31:28.460 instructions were so

00:31:29.340 bad that the jury

00:31:30.980 didn't know how to

00:31:31.700 come to a good

00:31:32.480 verdict.

00:31:34.040 It feels like CNN is

00:31:35.940 trying to set us up.

00:31:38.280 Now, again, when I say

00:31:39.560 that, I don't mean that

00:31:40.860 they planned that, like

00:31:42.600 they had a meeting and

00:31:43.480 they said, hey, let's

00:31:44.060 try to create a riot.

00:31:45.240 I don't think that.

00:31:46.820 I think that everybody

00:31:47.640 just follows the money,

00:31:49.680 even if they're

00:31:51.100 convincing themselves

00:31:52.020 they're not.

00:31:52.580 So in a situation like

00:31:55.280 this, the hypnotist

00:31:56.380 would say, all the

00:31:57.940 people are telling the

00:31:58.800 truth when they think

00:32:01.820 they're just talking

00:32:02.520 about the news.

00:32:03.780 And if you put them

00:32:04.440 on a lie detector,

00:32:05.260 you'd say, are you

00:32:05.840 trying to create a

00:32:06.560 riot?

00:32:07.460 They would all say no

00:32:08.620 and they would all

00:32:09.640 pass.

00:32:10.600 The lie detector would

00:32:11.580 find no sign of

00:32:14.100 lying.

00:32:16.600 But, as I often

00:32:18.560 tell you, you can

00:32:20.260 always predict where

00:32:21.200 things are going by

00:32:22.160 following the money.

00:32:24.040 So, is it a

00:32:25.240 coincidence that the

00:32:26.480 CNN people say

00:32:27.400 exactly what will

00:32:28.320 make them the most

00:32:29.060 money?

00:32:30.640 I don't think so.

00:32:32.080 It's not a

00:32:32.780 coincidence.

00:32:33.880 Because it happens

00:32:34.460 always.

00:32:35.720 It's 100% of the

00:32:36.640 time.

00:32:37.240 It never goes the

00:32:38.140 other way.

00:32:39.280 If it sometimes

00:32:40.080 went the other way,

00:32:40.820 you'd say, oh, that

00:32:41.460 could be a coincidence.

00:32:43.080 But if it never goes

00:32:43.960 the other way, it

00:32:45.600 just means that

00:32:46.360 following the money

00:32:47.020 works, even when

00:32:48.320 the people don't

00:32:48.860 know they're doing

00:32:49.340 it.

00:32:52.160 What was

00:32:53.020 Carpe Dunctum's

00:32:54.440 MSNBC?

00:32:55.360 Oh, MSNBC

00:32:56.300 apparently showed

00:32:57.160 the prosecutors'

00:32:59.420 closing statements,

00:33:00.520 but not the

00:33:01.160 defense.

00:33:03.440 Now, again, if you

00:33:05.940 were to put a lie

00:33:06.600 detector on the

00:33:07.660 MSNBC producers,

00:33:09.860 and you said, why

00:33:10.540 did you do that?

00:33:12.320 Do you think they'd

00:33:13.220 say, you know, we

00:33:14.500 just thought we'd

00:33:15.300 like to get us a good

00:33:16.980 riot here.

00:33:17.980 We'll just show the

00:33:18.680 prosecution.

00:33:19.060 No, no, I'll bet

00:33:21.300 nobody had that

00:33:22.100 thought.

00:33:23.260 I'll bet everybody

00:33:24.100 at MSNBC simply

00:33:27.140 thought they were

00:33:27.880 making programming

00:33:28.920 decisions.

00:33:30.720 Probably said to

00:33:31.600 themselves, well, when

00:33:32.520 the defense is speaking,

00:33:33.600 that's our highest

00:33:34.200 rated show, so we

00:33:35.820 don't want to put

00:33:36.920 that off, so we'll

00:33:38.260 wait for a lower

00:33:38.980 rated show.

00:33:39.720 Oh, that's just

00:33:40.380 when the prosecution

00:33:41.700 is talking.

00:33:43.820 I'll bet you they

00:33:45.660 could pass a lie

00:33:46.580 detector test saying

00:33:48.500 that they did it

00:33:49.580 for just regular

00:33:50.460 programming interest

00:33:51.800 and had nothing to

00:33:52.660 do with trying to

00:33:54.060 make anything

00:33:54.500 happen.

00:33:55.860 Now, I see some

00:33:56.740 people disagreeing,

00:33:58.440 some saying that

00:33:59.120 they absolutely know

00:34:00.280 what they're doing.

00:34:02.060 Could be.

00:34:03.580 You know, I'm not

00:34:04.180 going to disagree.

00:34:04.780 Actually, I don't

00:34:05.820 think I'll press that

00:34:07.920 point further, because

00:34:09.800 I certainly don't have

00:34:11.880 absolute certainty

00:34:13.400 that nobody knows

00:34:15.300 what they're doing

00:34:15.840 here.

00:34:16.040 So this might be a

00:34:17.900 case where they

00:34:18.420 know exactly what

00:34:19.180 they're doing.

00:34:19.580 I'll give you that.

00:34:21.180 I'll give you that.

00:34:22.940 It might be a case

00:34:23.880 where they know

00:34:24.660 exactly what they're

00:34:25.460 doing.

00:34:26.340 But I'll only say

00:34:27.960 that that's not

00:34:28.900 necessary.

00:34:30.300 It's not necessary

00:34:31.540 that they know

00:34:32.160 they're doing it,

00:34:32.760 because it's going

00:34:33.160 to happen either

00:34:33.600 way.

00:34:34.520 They're going to

00:34:35.200 follow the money

00:34:36.000 either way.

00:34:39.320 Sometimes they know

00:34:40.200 it, sometimes they

00:34:40.940 don't.

00:34:41.540 If you think they

00:34:42.260 know it in this

00:34:42.740 case, I wouldn't say

00:34:44.340 you're wrong,

00:34:44.880 necessarily.

00:34:46.500 All right.

00:34:47.200 I got this comment

00:34:48.280 from Josh Jordan.

00:34:49.620 He's a blue

00:34:50.560 Czech guy on

00:34:51.420 Twitter.

00:34:53.020 And when I said

00:34:53.860 that CNN was

00:34:54.480 trying to maybe

00:34:55.540 start a riot,

00:34:56.960 he said sarcastically,

00:34:58.320 yes, the tiny CNN

00:34:59.540 audience is going

00:35:00.360 to start riots,

00:35:01.060 because Toobin

00:35:01.680 said the instructions

00:35:02.480 were botched.

00:35:03.980 Sarcasm.

00:35:05.200 Now, here's my

00:35:05.980 first response.

00:35:08.120 It's not the tiny

00:35:09.280 CNN audience that

00:35:10.580 matters.

00:35:11.620 It's their online

00:35:12.580 presence, and the

00:35:13.920 fact that they

00:35:14.440 give all the

00:35:15.460 Democrats their

00:35:16.180 talking points.

00:35:17.480 It matters who

00:35:18.460 watches, and it

00:35:19.580 matters who sees

00:35:20.700 the clips and

00:35:21.300 stuff online.

00:35:22.800 So if you think

00:35:24.260 that CNN's reach

00:35:25.600 is based on their

00:35:27.040 live audience, it's

00:35:29.120 not.

00:35:29.860 It's not based on

00:35:30.880 that at all.

00:35:31.660 In fact, I think

00:35:32.360 they use the live

00:35:33.240 program just to

00:35:34.020 create clips for

00:35:35.720 their online content.

00:35:37.760 It's mostly a

00:35:38.540 website at this

00:35:39.800 point.

00:35:40.540 It's basically a

00:35:41.240 website.

00:35:41.480 Does anybody

00:35:42.300 have any data?

00:35:43.080 Maybe you can

00:35:43.460 find it while I'm

00:35:44.160 on here.

00:35:44.960 Find me the

00:35:45.720 number of viewers

00:35:46.860 for the CNN

00:35:48.520 website, or their

00:35:51.120 content, any way

00:35:52.020 you can find it,

00:35:52.780 versus the number

00:35:53.800 of live viewers.

00:35:55.680 Should be a

00:35:56.500 gigantic difference,

00:35:57.440 right?

00:35:58.840 I think there's a

00:35:59.580 gigantic difference.

00:36:00.400 Anyway, so that's

00:36:01.480 my first complaint.

00:36:02.880 Then Josh Jordan

00:36:04.280 went on.

00:36:04.760 He said, just

00:36:05.320 imagine what

00:36:06.040 could happen if

00:36:07.240 someone with a

00:36:07.900 real audience,

00:36:08.820 like the

00:36:09.640 president of the

00:36:10.180 United States,

00:36:11.300 told everyone a

00:36:12.160 national election

00:36:12.960 was rigged.

00:36:14.460 Oh.

00:36:16.040 So what about

00:36:16.700 that?

00:36:18.000 So Trump did

00:36:19.440 tell the nation

00:36:20.100 that the election

00:36:20.700 was rigged.

00:36:22.500 So I asked this

00:36:23.480 question back to

00:36:24.220 Josh.

00:36:24.520 I said, what was

00:36:25.860 he supposed to

00:36:26.680 say if he

00:36:27.800 believed it was

00:36:28.920 true?

00:36:30.140 And I'll ask you

00:36:30.820 the same question.

00:36:32.140 So many of us,

00:36:33.200 and I would

00:36:33.860 include myself,

00:36:35.600 were not impressed

00:36:37.000 with the way Trump

00:36:37.900 handled the laws.

00:36:38.960 Is that fair to

00:36:40.160 say?

00:36:40.820 You know, you

00:36:41.140 could be a

00:36:41.540 supporter and

00:36:42.560 still say you

00:36:43.120 don't like the

00:36:43.600 way he handled

00:36:44.080 the laws.

00:36:44.980 You might not

00:36:45.500 like what he

00:36:46.100 talked about,

00:36:46.880 you know, the

00:36:47.280 January 6th

00:36:47.980 stuff.

00:36:48.760 You might not

00:36:49.440 like that he

00:36:50.360 complained as

00:36:51.320 much as he did

00:36:52.180 about the

00:36:52.860 election being

00:36:53.760 fraudulent in

00:36:55.420 his opinion.

00:36:57.100 But let me ask

00:36:57.960 you this.

00:36:59.280 What if he

00:36:59.880 believed it was

00:37:00.660 true?

00:37:02.520 Well, let me

00:37:03.300 back up.

00:37:04.460 Do you think he

00:37:05.040 believed it's

00:37:05.580 true?

00:37:05.740 Do you

00:37:07.240 think that

00:37:07.620 Trump honestly

00:37:09.460 believes the

00:37:11.500 election was

00:37:12.040 stolen?

00:37:13.020 I do.

00:37:13.960 I think he

00:37:14.480 honestly believes

00:37:15.260 that.

00:37:16.280 Now, if he

00:37:18.100 honestly believes

00:37:18.980 it, and at

00:37:20.900 the time he was

00:37:21.580 still president of

00:37:22.420 the United States,

00:37:24.180 do you want a

00:37:25.160 president who

00:37:25.700 doesn't tell you

00:37:26.560 that?

00:37:27.660 What is the

00:37:28.380 better situation?

00:37:30.340 Is the better

00:37:31.240 situation that he

00:37:32.420 lies to us?

00:37:33.160 Or that he

00:37:35.220 rolls over?

00:37:37.200 Did the

00:37:37.900 Republicans elect

00:37:40.260 a lion or a

00:37:42.620 kitten?

00:37:43.900 If Republicans

00:37:45.620 had elected a

00:37:46.820 kitten, then yes,

00:37:48.880 they'd be quite

00:37:49.380 happy if he

00:37:49.940 rolled over, even

00:37:51.420 if he thought he

00:37:52.060 shouldn't.

00:37:53.200 That's what

00:37:53.700 kittens do.

00:37:54.380 We elected a

00:37:55.040 kitten.

00:37:56.020 You don't expect

00:37:56.680 a kitten to put

00:37:57.380 up much of a

00:37:57.960 fight.

00:37:59.240 But Republicans

00:38:01.240 elected a lion.

00:38:02.220 And they got

00:38:03.540 one.

00:38:04.460 They got exactly

00:38:05.280 what they

00:38:05.660 elected.

00:38:06.820 Right?

00:38:07.860 And what's a

00:38:08.400 lion supposed to

00:38:09.260 do?

00:38:11.300 A lion is

00:38:12.260 supposed to be

00:38:12.980 a lion.

00:38:14.480 So, Trump, if

00:38:16.740 I had to guess,

00:38:17.560 we can't read his

00:38:18.240 mind, but I'm

00:38:20.020 sure he thinks,

00:38:21.700 I mean, I think

00:38:22.780 the odds are

00:38:23.380 really high that

00:38:24.780 he thinks he

00:38:25.360 won.

00:38:27.020 Now, my

00:38:28.720 opinion is it

00:38:29.420 probably had more

00:38:30.160 to do with the

00:38:31.060 actual legal stuff

00:38:32.840 behind the scenes

00:38:34.460 before the

00:38:35.060 election, probably

00:38:36.500 less to do with

00:38:37.440 how the election

00:38:38.040 was counted.

00:38:40.040 But, it's still

00:38:42.380 a stolen election.

00:38:43.740 It's just stolen

00:38:44.680 legally.

00:38:45.720 So, you can steal

00:38:46.560 an election

00:38:47.200 legally, and I

00:38:49.140 think that's

00:38:49.540 exactly what

00:38:50.080 happened.

00:38:51.120 But, I will

00:38:52.620 also add this

00:38:53.360 to the thought,

00:38:54.240 that the election

00:38:55.200 system is in a

00:38:56.200 category.

00:38:56.740 It's in a

00:38:57.880 category of

00:38:58.480 big, complex

00:38:59.980 things that

00:39:01.720 are somewhat

00:39:02.840 opaque.

00:39:04.420 In other words,

00:39:05.020 you and I have

00:39:05.620 never seen the

00:39:06.300 code for the

00:39:07.560 electronic parts

00:39:09.340 of the system,

00:39:10.660 right?

00:39:11.280 That's invisible

00:39:12.320 to us, and if

00:39:13.060 you asked for the

00:39:13.620 code, they

00:39:13.980 wouldn't give it

00:39:14.380 to you.

00:39:14.960 So, our

00:39:15.560 election system

00:39:16.260 is not

00:39:16.940 transparent, by

00:39:18.400 design.

00:39:19.120 It's not even

00:39:19.900 intended to be

00:39:20.680 transparent.

00:39:21.120 And, there's

00:39:23.760 big money

00:39:24.220 involved, you

00:39:25.160 know, big

00:39:25.620 stakes.

00:39:27.500 So, in that

00:39:28.060 situation, if it's

00:39:29.260 complicated, and

00:39:30.020 it's big, and

00:39:30.540 there's lots of

00:39:30.960 money, and

00:39:31.480 it's not

00:39:32.880 transparent, fraud

00:39:34.920 will happen

00:39:35.320 every time.

00:39:37.820 Fraud will

00:39:38.460 happen every

00:39:39.040 time.

00:39:39.560 The only thing

00:39:40.140 you don't know

00:39:40.740 is how much,

00:39:42.460 and whether

00:39:43.000 there was enough

00:39:43.700 this time.

00:39:45.000 So, I don't

00:39:45.620 have any, I

00:39:46.420 have no proof

00:39:47.120 that there was

00:39:47.900 fraud that

00:39:48.420 changed the

00:39:48.900 election outcome.

00:39:49.980 And, I see

00:39:51.400 a troll over

00:39:52.520 on YouTube

00:39:54.920 saying that

00:39:56.240 T-Rump

00:39:57.220 lost, in

00:39:58.900 capital letters,

00:39:59.640 lost.

00:40:00.680 Now, I've

00:40:02.340 said that from

00:40:02.880 the start.

00:40:04.400 I said that

00:40:05.320 the system,

00:40:06.600 which we

00:40:07.740 respect, even

00:40:08.860 with its flaws,

00:40:09.720 we respect the

00:40:10.440 system, the

00:40:11.180 system elected

00:40:13.020 Biden.

00:40:14.000 I accepted

00:40:14.600 it on day

00:40:15.140 one, which

00:40:16.000 is different

00:40:16.440 from whether

00:40:17.000 it should

00:40:17.420 have, or

00:40:18.040 whether it

00:40:18.400 was fair,

00:40:19.060 or anything.

00:40:19.280 But, the

00:40:20.060 system, unfortunately

00:40:21.580 we have to

00:40:22.200 support the

00:40:22.680 system over

00:40:23.320 the result,

00:40:24.580 if you want

00:40:25.820 the republic

00:40:26.980 to stay

00:40:27.460 together.

00:40:28.720 Sometimes the

00:40:29.640 system is going

00:40:30.240 to give us

00:40:30.660 the wrong

00:40:30.980 result.

00:40:31.800 Actually, lots

00:40:32.420 of times.

00:40:33.400 But, if you

00:40:34.220 tear down the

00:40:34.760 system, you

00:40:35.280 have more

00:40:35.600 trouble than

00:40:36.180 if you argue

00:40:38.020 with the

00:40:38.360 result.

00:40:40.720 So, in

00:40:42.600 my opinion, it

00:40:43.340 is unknowable,

00:40:44.420 but, and

00:40:45.000 then, of

00:40:45.280 course, Josh

00:40:45.860 came back with

00:40:46.660 the courts,

00:40:47.380 didn't find

00:40:47.880 anything, and

00:40:49.100 then I

00:40:49.420 responded with,

00:40:50.880 the courts

00:40:51.400 are not

00:40:51.760 designed to

00:40:52.340 find fraud

00:40:52.920 in elections.

00:40:54.200 And, in

00:40:54.560 fact, they

00:40:54.900 mostly ruled

00:40:55.580 that they

00:40:55.880 didn't have

00:40:56.220 standing, or

00:40:57.460 that it was

00:40:57.820 too late to

00:40:58.460 ask.

00:40:59.540 So, courts

00:41:00.200 didn't make

00:41:00.940 any rulings

00:41:01.500 about fraud

00:41:02.400 in the

00:41:02.660 election.

00:41:05.940 Politics

00:41:06.340 Insider, which

00:41:07.100 I guess is

00:41:07.500 part of

00:41:07.780 Business

00:41:08.080 Insider, is

00:41:09.940 saying that

00:41:10.320 Buttigieg is

00:41:11.020 the most

00:41:11.340 powerful

00:41:11.720 transportation

00:41:12.400 secretary,

00:41:12.960 because he's

00:41:13.460 got this

00:41:13.860 one-point

00:41:14.920 trillion

00:41:15.320 infrastructure

00:41:15.920 bill that

00:41:16.620 he can

00:41:16.940 dole out.

00:41:18.440 To which

00:41:18.980 I say,

00:41:19.820 did I

00:41:20.180 imagine that

00:41:23.140 Biden

00:41:23.520 appointed a

00:41:25.040 infrastructure

00:41:25.740 czar?

00:41:27.020 Did I just

00:41:27.800 imagine that?

00:41:29.140 And is the

00:41:29.720 infrastructure

00:41:30.380 czar not

00:41:31.460 the one who

00:41:32.100 would make

00:41:32.440 all these

00:41:32.820 decisions that

00:41:33.600 were just

00:41:34.040 attributed to

00:41:35.260 Buttigieg?

00:41:36.340 What am I

00:41:37.060 missing?

00:41:38.940 I'm just

00:41:39.620 confused by

00:41:40.280 the story.

00:41:40.740 Did I

00:41:43.400 miss a

00:41:43.900 story that

00:41:44.660 somebody else

00:41:45.740 was put in

00:41:46.300 charge of

00:41:46.700 this?

00:41:48.500 And who

00:41:49.120 does that

00:41:49.480 person report

00:41:50.040 to?

00:41:50.240 Maybe they

00:41:50.580 report to

00:41:51.060 Buttigieg.

00:41:52.360 But it's

00:41:53.020 still going to

00:41:53.340 be somebody

00:41:53.800 else doing

00:41:54.580 the hard

00:41:54.900 work,

00:41:55.300 right?

00:41:58.400 Thank you,

00:41:59.100 Goose.

00:42:01.220 Anyway, I'm

00:42:02.040 just confused

00:42:02.580 of that,

00:42:03.040 because it's

00:42:03.400 two stories

00:42:04.560 that are

00:42:04.840 opposites,

00:42:05.500 and they're

00:42:05.680 both in

00:42:06.000 the news

00:42:06.280 at the

00:42:06.520 same time.

00:42:09.120 Have I

00:42:09.680 told you

00:42:10.020 before that

00:42:10.660 you should

00:42:11.000 not reject

00:42:11.600 your

00:42:11.800 opponent's

00:42:12.220 arguments,

00:42:12.740 because that

00:42:13.200 never works.

00:42:14.760 You should

00:42:15.120 get inside

00:42:15.680 them.

00:42:17.620 So here's

00:42:18.180 a persuasion

00:42:18.780 tip again,

00:42:19.500 and I'll

00:42:19.660 give you

00:42:19.860 another

00:42:20.100 example of

00:42:20.820 it.

00:42:21.380 You should

00:42:21.760 get inside

00:42:22.440 your

00:42:23.520 opponent's

00:42:24.940 persuasion.

00:42:25.820 Don't say

00:42:26.160 it's all

00:42:26.400 wrong.

00:42:27.980 Wear it

00:42:28.600 like a

00:42:29.020 suit,

00:42:29.860 and then

00:42:30.440 change it

00:42:31.960 from the

00:42:32.220 inside.

00:42:33.340 Now, when

00:42:33.760 Trump was

00:42:34.300 first running

00:42:34.860 for president,

00:42:37.020 he was

00:42:38.420 accused of

00:42:39.000 not being

00:42:39.420 a Republican

00:42:40.000 enough,

00:42:41.140 right?

00:42:41.760 But instead

00:42:42.380 of just

00:42:43.100 being

00:42:43.380 anti-Republican,

00:42:44.740 which wouldn't

00:42:45.240 have worked,

00:42:46.240 he became

00:42:47.220 more Republican

00:42:47.980 than the

00:42:48.460 Republicans.

00:42:49.120 He basically

00:42:49.600 got inside

00:42:50.400 their argument.

00:42:52.460 Does that

00:42:52.740 make sense?

00:42:53.840 Instead of

00:42:54.480 saying,

00:42:54.880 no, I am

00:42:55.480 one, he'd be

00:42:56.520 outside the

00:42:57.020 argument arguing

00:42:57.740 with people.

00:42:58.560 No, I am

00:42:59.100 Republican.

00:42:59.780 I'm Republican

00:43:00.400 enough.

00:43:01.380 He became

00:43:01.980 more Republican

00:43:02.720 than the

00:43:03.200 Republicans.

00:43:05.140 Right?

00:43:06.220 So as soon as

00:43:07.040 he became more

00:43:07.720 Republican than

00:43:08.460 Republicans, it

00:43:09.140 was hard to

00:43:09.520 say anything

00:43:09.900 about him.

00:43:10.840 Because he

00:43:11.360 was more

00:43:11.700 Republican than

00:43:12.400 they were.

00:43:13.320 He was

00:43:13.860 harder on the

00:43:14.380 border than

00:43:14.860 they were.

00:43:15.860 You know, all

00:43:16.520 that stuff.

00:43:18.100 Harder on, you

00:43:18.980 know, police,

00:43:20.360 wanting police,

00:43:21.540 et cetera.

00:43:22.860 So that's one

00:43:23.700 example of it.

00:43:24.880 Let me give you

00:43:25.800 another one, and

00:43:26.860 I'll use it about

00:43:28.640 critical race

00:43:29.480 theory.

00:43:30.600 Suppose you

00:43:31.280 don't like

00:43:31.680 critical race

00:43:32.300 theory in

00:43:32.820 school, and

00:43:33.340 you're arguing,

00:43:34.300 get that out of

00:43:35.020 my school.

00:43:36.380 What's the

00:43:36.780 other side say?

00:43:38.440 There's no

00:43:39.080 critical race

00:43:39.940 theory in

00:43:40.600 school.

00:43:41.620 What are you

00:43:41.960 talking about?

00:43:43.060 And you say,

00:43:43.520 yes, there is,

00:43:44.280 yes, there is,

00:43:44.900 get it out of

00:43:45.400 there.

00:43:46.120 And then the

00:43:46.600 other side says,

00:43:47.880 no, no, there

00:43:48.580 isn't.

00:43:49.160 You white

00:43:49.760 supremacist, no,

00:43:51.200 there's nothing

00:43:51.540 here.

00:43:52.660 So you notice

00:43:53.400 how being

00:43:54.200 outside the

00:43:54.960 argument gets

00:43:55.660 you no

00:43:56.000 traction, right?

00:43:57.360 Now here's the

00:43:58.020 alternative.

00:43:59.500 Get inside the

00:44:00.300 argument.

00:44:01.680 Critical race

00:44:02.380 theory, totally,

00:44:04.980 totally,

00:44:05.680 uh,

00:44:06.460 totally is not

00:44:08.420 happening.

00:44:10.840 But, do you

00:44:12.520 know what is

00:44:12.900 happening?

00:44:14.020 Because the

00:44:14.700 schools are not

00:44:15.420 teaching critical

00:44:16.160 race theory.

00:44:17.240 So I'm going to

00:44:18.500 model my argument

00:44:19.340 here.

00:44:20.140 I agree with you,

00:44:21.920 Democrats, when you

00:44:23.180 say that there's no

00:44:24.280 critical race theory

00:44:25.280 being taught in

00:44:26.340 school, you are

00:44:27.040 100% correct.

00:44:29.400 Now watch what I'm

00:44:30.280 doing.

00:44:30.920 Before you react,

00:44:32.420 watch what I'm

00:44:32.920 doing.

00:44:33.160 I'm entering the

00:44:34.720 argument.

00:44:35.900 I'm not debating

00:44:36.900 it, I'm entering

00:44:37.840 it.

00:44:38.820 Yeah.

00:44:39.940 Critical race

00:44:40.660 theory, no way

00:44:41.420 that's being taught

00:44:42.000 in schools.

00:44:42.920 There are no

00:44:43.600 examples of it.

00:44:44.720 You can't give me

00:44:45.400 one example of

00:44:46.320 critical race theory

00:44:47.360 being taught in

00:44:48.600 schools, because

00:44:49.180 critical race theory

00:44:50.080 is above school

00:44:51.880 level.

00:44:52.220 It's sort of a

00:44:52.700 college level

00:44:53.440 concept, and it

00:44:55.240 is not in, in

00:44:56.660 schools.

00:44:56.980 But you know

00:44:58.600 what is?

00:45:00.120 Do you know what

00:45:00.820 is in schools?

00:45:03.260 Systemic critical

00:45:04.460 race theory.

00:45:05.480 There isn't any

00:45:06.240 direct critical race

00:45:07.340 theory, I totally

00:45:08.160 agree.

00:45:09.220 I'm with you,

00:45:10.020 Democrats.

00:45:10.840 There's no critical

00:45:11.580 race theory, but

00:45:12.500 there is systemic,

00:45:13.940 meaning that if you

00:45:14.960 were to look at how

00:45:15.840 the lessons are being

00:45:16.780 taught, you can see

00:45:17.640 it's embedded in the

00:45:18.520 lessons, without the

00:45:20.140 name.

00:45:22.160 So I started the

00:45:23.880 hashtag, it turns

00:45:25.580 out somebody on the

00:45:26.720 other side was using

00:45:28.180 it already, but

00:45:28.880 that's funny.

00:45:30.140 Systemic CRT.

00:45:32.540 Now, likewise, when

00:45:33.780 the Democrats say,

00:45:37.140 hey, there's lots of

00:45:37.860 systemic racism in the

00:45:39.160 world, do you say,

00:45:40.860 no, there isn't?

00:45:41.500 We're not a racist

00:45:42.180 country?

00:45:43.040 Because if you do,

00:45:44.160 you're losing the

00:45:44.940 argument.

00:45:46.320 That's a terrible

00:45:47.280 argument.

00:45:48.380 The worst argument is,

00:45:50.020 no, there isn't.

00:45:51.660 No, there isn't.

00:45:52.480 There's no critical

00:45:53.100 race theory.

00:45:54.200 Terrible argument.

00:45:55.680 You'll never get an

00:45:56.880 inch with that

00:45:57.600 argument.

00:45:57.920 Instead, get inside

00:46:01.320 it.

00:46:02.440 Get inside it.

00:46:03.960 If you get inside it,

00:46:05.160 you say, yeah, there's

00:46:06.040 systemic racism, it's the

00:46:07.480 biggest frickin' problem

00:46:08.380 in the country.

00:46:09.920 And that's honest, because

00:46:11.720 I think that.

00:46:12.660 I think systemic racism is

00:46:14.200 the biggest problem in the

00:46:15.680 country, as it is

00:46:18.200 expressed by the

00:46:19.300 teachers' unions.

00:46:21.000 See what I did there?

00:46:22.900 First, you get inside the

00:46:24.160 argument by agreeing with

00:46:25.260 it totally.

00:46:25.640 You could call it

00:46:26.640 pacing, but I'm going

00:46:27.500 further.

00:46:28.400 It's not just pacing.

00:46:30.320 You have to get inside

00:46:31.340 the argument.

00:46:32.320 You have to wear it like

00:46:33.540 clothes.

00:46:34.700 And then you can do

00:46:35.420 something with it.

00:46:36.620 Like, you have to put it

00:46:37.380 on like a jacket, and

00:46:39.200 then you can move the

00:46:39.880 arms and stuff, right?

00:46:40.980 But until you put the

00:46:41.900 jacket on, you've got

00:46:43.240 nothing.

00:46:44.340 You're shooting blanks.

00:46:46.340 You know, you're just

00:46:46.780 like spitting into the

00:46:47.700 ocean, doing nothing.

00:46:49.460 But as soon as you say,

00:46:50.840 yeah, can I help you get

00:46:52.000 rid of this systemic

00:46:52.760 racism?

00:46:53.220 And if you will agree,

00:46:54.560 we'll work on the

00:46:55.180 biggest problems first.

00:46:57.200 Who says no to that?

00:46:59.140 Who says no to working on

00:47:01.000 the biggest problem first?

00:47:03.980 Nobody.

00:47:05.280 So now you're inside the

00:47:06.560 argument.

00:47:07.400 You're agreeing that

00:47:08.100 systemic racism exists.

00:47:10.080 And you're going to say,

00:47:10.820 are you happy with how

00:47:12.140 black kids and other

00:47:13.840 people of color are being

00:47:15.020 taught?

00:47:16.580 Nobody says yes.

00:47:18.180 Nobody.

00:47:18.520 Nobody will say, yeah,

00:47:20.200 it's doing pretty good.

00:47:22.000 Those black students are

00:47:23.380 getting just as good

00:47:24.120 education as everybody

00:47:25.100 else.

00:47:25.660 Nope.

00:47:26.620 Nope.

00:47:26.980 Nobody's going to say

00:47:27.680 that.

00:47:28.620 So now you're totally

00:47:29.520 inside the argument.

00:47:30.620 You've identified the

00:47:31.600 biggest form of systemic

00:47:32.980 racism.

00:47:33.940 You've got them to agree.

00:47:36.560 Now what can we do

00:47:37.540 about it?

00:47:38.540 It's the teachers'

00:47:39.260 unions, because they're

00:47:40.100 the ones preventing

00:47:40.960 competition in schools.

00:47:44.200 And without competition,

00:47:45.320 nothing works.

00:47:46.360 Nothing works without

00:47:47.220 competition.

00:47:48.420 No exceptions.

00:47:50.980 All right.

00:47:51.480 So that's how you get

00:47:53.160 inside an argument.

00:47:56.640 Here's a provocative,

00:48:00.020 sexist, disgusting

00:48:01.840 opinion that might

00:48:04.300 nonetheless be accurate.

00:48:08.040 Here's where I might

00:48:09.200 get canceled.

00:48:11.060 I might.

00:48:12.480 Let's see.

00:48:12.980 So this is a tweet by a

00:48:17.340 Twitter user named

00:48:18.240 Stephan.

00:48:19.540 Nobody I know.

00:48:21.700 And on this topic, he

00:48:23.060 said, teachers' unions

00:48:24.300 are predominantly

00:48:26.100 female.

00:48:27.520 The problem here is

00:48:28.580 female do-good-rism,

00:48:30.580 which is properly

00:48:31.440 channeled through

00:48:32.180 religion and charity,

00:48:33.940 but in this case is

00:48:34.820 being transformed into

00:48:36.020 a political offensive.

00:48:38.260 He said it, not me.

00:48:39.680 Now, somebody else

00:48:41.600 pointed out that this

00:48:42.920 was Hitler's technique

00:48:44.020 as well, that the

00:48:45.900 Hitler youth was more

00:48:48.500 about the girls.

00:48:50.020 Have you ever heard

00:48:50.620 that?

00:48:51.180 I've never heard that

00:48:51.880 before, so I can't do

00:48:53.440 a fact check on it.

00:48:55.020 But the idea was that

00:48:56.680 when you convinced the

00:48:57.880 boys to be like a

00:48:59.040 Hitler youth, that

00:49:00.340 worked.

00:49:03.440 But convincing the

00:49:04.880 girls was more

00:49:06.080 important because they

00:49:06.940 would be raising the

00:49:07.680 kids.

00:49:09.420 Convincing the girls was

00:49:10.860 the important point

00:49:11.820 because that gets you

00:49:12.940 forever because they're

00:49:14.520 the ones raising the

00:49:15.320 kids, right?

00:49:17.840 And when we see that

00:49:19.260 women predominate or

00:49:21.620 are dominating the

00:49:23.340 teachers' unions, and

00:49:24.900 we see that the

00:49:25.500 teachers' unions are

00:49:26.480 used to perpetuate

00:49:29.540 systemic racism and

00:49:32.040 keep black people down,

00:49:33.520 especially, it looks like

00:49:37.040 a woman problem,

00:49:37.840 doesn't it?

00:49:42.460 Now, let me stop here

00:49:45.800 and say, I'm not

00:49:47.980 buying into the

00:49:48.680 argument totally.

00:49:50.280 So I'm not buying into

00:49:51.400 this argument.

00:49:52.300 I'm telling you what the

00:49:53.200 argument is because I

00:49:54.020 think it's provocative

00:49:56.240 enough that it's worthy

00:49:57.860 to be in the mix.

00:49:59.700 But every time you say

00:50:00.880 it's all about women or

00:50:02.260 all about men, you're

00:50:03.440 automatically into biased,

00:50:05.620 you know, bigoted

00:50:06.480 territory, right?

00:50:07.780 So I don't want to be in

00:50:08.980 bigoted territory by

00:50:10.260 saying it's a woman

00:50:11.180 problem.

00:50:12.080 But it is true that

00:50:13.260 women mostly are

00:50:14.300 responsible for raising

00:50:15.280 kids.

00:50:16.540 That's still true.

00:50:17.920 It doesn't need to be,

00:50:19.200 and blah, blah, blah,

00:50:19.980 plenty of men are doing

00:50:20.900 that job, and plenty of

00:50:22.140 gays are doing it, blah,

00:50:23.500 blah, blah.

00:50:23.840 But it's still true in

00:50:24.980 general, mostly female

00:50:26.520 raising the kids.

00:50:29.100 All right, let's talk

00:50:30.160 about Bannon.

00:50:30.700 So Bannon refused to

00:50:33.120 talk to Congress.

00:50:34.940 They find him in

00:50:35.700 contempt, and he turned

00:50:37.560 himself in.

00:50:39.540 And then he said he

00:50:42.120 vowed to topple the

00:50:43.840 Biden regime, as he

00:50:45.040 calls it, and to make

00:50:47.420 the charges against him

00:50:48.620 a, quote, misdemeanor

00:50:49.880 from hell for the

00:50:52.660 Democrats.

00:50:53.760 Now, he believes that

00:50:54.720 Biden ordered Merrick

00:50:56.100 to go after Bannon.

00:51:02.060 So he says it's

00:51:02.860 basically a political

00:51:04.060 witch hunt.

00:51:06.320 Now, here's the fun

00:51:08.580 part.

00:51:10.320 Here's the fun part.

00:51:12.920 When the Democrats go

00:51:14.320 after the founder of

00:51:18.080 Barstool Sports, they

00:51:22.380 can take a pretty big

00:51:24.740 bite on him, although

00:51:25.600 he's doing a great job

00:51:26.540 of fighting back.

00:51:27.660 So I don't think he's

00:51:28.440 going to get canceled.

00:51:29.840 But he's mostly in a

00:51:31.980 defensive stance,

00:51:33.320 wouldn't you say?

00:51:34.580 I mean, he's going

00:51:35.140 offense against specific

00:51:36.580 media groups that went

00:51:37.940 against him, but mostly

00:51:39.700 he's just trying to

00:51:40.360 survive.

00:51:43.500 Alex Jones is, I guess

00:51:45.080 he lost a lawsuit that

00:51:47.940 could be really bad for

00:51:49.060 Alex Jones, and he

00:51:50.500 might, it might be that

00:51:51.620 the left has taken Alex

00:51:53.300 Jones off the field.

00:51:54.260 I don't know that

00:51:55.760 that's true, but this

00:51:56.800 lawsuit that he lost

00:51:57.920 looks pretty, pretty

00:51:58.920 bad.

00:52:00.120 It might, it might just

00:52:02.220 take him off the field,

00:52:03.220 but I don't know.

00:52:05.600 But do you know what

00:52:07.320 Bannon isn't?

00:52:09.600 He isn't one of those

00:52:10.660 people.

00:52:13.780 Bannon has, let's say,

00:52:19.040 let's say Bannon's game

00:52:20.700 is at a different level.

00:52:24.200 And I think that it's

00:52:27.280 possibly a gigantic

00:52:29.260 mistake to give him

00:52:31.240 this much attention.

00:52:33.260 You know what I mean?

00:52:34.800 Because his power is

00:52:36.100 going up, it's not

00:52:36.880 going down.

00:52:38.200 If they put Bannon in

00:52:39.660 jail for this, he will

00:52:42.820 be the leader of the

00:52:43.860 Democrats, he'll be the

00:52:44.980 leader of the Republicans.

00:52:45.960 And he's not even

00:52:48.140 asking to be, right?

00:52:49.520 He's not even trying.

00:52:51.260 That's sort of not his

00:52:52.500 deal.

00:52:53.160 He wants to be

00:52:53.720 influential, but he

00:52:54.560 doesn't need to be like

00:52:55.540 the top guy.

00:52:56.460 But you put him in jail

00:52:57.620 and he turns into

00:52:58.320 Nelson Mandela.

00:53:00.940 Do you know who

00:53:01.740 knows that?

00:53:03.400 Bannon.

00:53:04.760 Bannon knows that.

00:53:06.220 Now you can't do that,

00:53:07.160 right?

00:53:07.400 He's an energy monster.

00:53:08.460 That is correct.

00:53:09.900 He learned that from

00:53:10.940 Trump if he didn't

00:53:11.740 already know it.

00:53:12.420 But he is anti-fragile.

00:53:16.840 Now there aren't too

00:53:17.600 many people like that.

00:53:19.460 But if they don't take

00:53:21.740 Bannon out, he's going

00:53:23.160 to take them out.

00:53:25.100 So unlike going after

00:53:27.880 some lesser pundits, if

00:53:31.640 you take a run at Alex

00:53:32.700 Jones and you don't take

00:53:33.740 him out, well, it was

00:53:36.100 worth a shot, right?

00:53:38.060 You didn't take him out,

00:53:39.360 but it was worth a shot.

00:53:40.300 There's no real downside

00:53:41.200 to that.

00:53:41.640 Because he's going to

00:53:42.520 say bad things about

00:53:43.400 Democrats no matter

00:53:44.200 what, right?

00:53:45.460 But if you don't take

00:53:46.620 Bannon out, you're just

00:53:49.680 making him stronger.

00:53:51.740 And I don't think

00:53:52.700 anybody has quite a good

00:53:54.540 sense of how strong

00:53:55.900 Bannon's game is at

00:53:57.680 this level.

00:53:59.540 You're going to be

00:54:00.360 surprised, is what I

00:54:01.620 think.

00:54:02.460 So Bannon has the

00:54:03.360 surprises.

00:54:05.280 All right.

00:54:06.340 Biden had a Zoom

00:54:08.400 call or something like

00:54:09.680 China's head, Xi, and I

00:54:19.340 don't think he went

00:54:19.980 strong at him.

00:54:20.900 Let's just say that.

00:54:23.200 But it turns out that

00:54:24.400 China has now surpassed

00:54:26.320 the United States in

00:54:27.180 wealth.

00:54:28.320 China is the wealthiest

00:54:29.920 country now.

00:54:31.560 Now, how do you win a

00:54:33.060 war in 2021?

00:54:34.340 Is it with bombs?

00:54:37.380 Well, if a big power is

00:54:39.000 fighting a tiny power, yes.

00:54:41.260 But what if a superpower is

00:54:43.060 an adversary to another

00:54:44.960 superpower?

00:54:45.840 What is the weapon of

00:54:47.320 choice?

00:54:49.060 It's money.

00:54:50.820 It's money.

00:54:51.900 Whoever has the most money

00:54:53.020 is going to dominate.

00:54:54.600 That's China now.

00:54:55.500 So as long as China has

00:54:57.480 the most money, they are

00:54:58.880 the most powerful influence

00:55:00.140 in the world.

00:55:01.140 Because that money can

00:55:02.080 bribe stuff, it can create

00:55:03.600 industries, it can destroy

00:55:04.840 industries, it can do

00:55:06.540 anything.

00:55:07.500 Money is power.

00:55:09.380 So as long as China is

00:55:11.140 richer, Biden is their

00:55:13.020 bitch.

00:55:13.960 And certainly acted that

00:55:15.280 way.

00:55:17.340 He told Xi, Biden did,

00:55:20.640 that he has concerns over

00:55:22.400 human rights abuses.

00:55:25.500 Uh, really?

00:55:28.000 He has concerns?

00:55:30.140 Wow.

00:55:31.540 I'll bet President Xi was

00:55:33.580 shaken.

00:55:35.160 Oh, no, I didn't know you

00:55:36.260 had concerns about my

00:55:38.400 ethnic cleansing.

00:55:41.380 Do you know what?

00:55:43.220 Concerns about human rights

00:55:44.720 abuses.

00:55:45.780 Somebody needs to tell Xi

00:55:47.420 to his face, we believe

00:55:49.560 you're involved in ethnic

00:55:50.880 cleansing of the Uyghurs

00:55:52.380 and the fact that you don't

00:55:54.440 let international people

00:55:56.000 come and take a look, we

00:55:57.480 consider proof.

00:56:01.020 Nobody can say that to Xi,

00:56:02.400 can they?

00:56:03.900 Do you know that if Hitler

00:56:05.280 had been in control of more

00:56:07.840 of the supply chain, he would

00:56:09.180 have gotten away with the

00:56:10.500 Holocaust?

00:56:14.060 Sorry.

00:56:15.080 It's true.

00:56:15.720 If Germany had the same

00:56:18.400 control of the supply chain

00:56:21.380 as China does right now,

00:56:23.340 they could have done the

00:56:25.020 Holocaust and just gone on.

00:56:29.220 You know that's fucking true.

00:56:31.440 You do.

00:56:32.660 That's what China's doing.

00:56:34.220 They're doing their little

00:56:35.300 Holocaust, and they're just

00:56:37.940 going ahead.

00:56:40.760 Nobody cares.

00:56:42.340 Do you know that saying,

00:56:43.220 never again?

00:56:45.780 Well, perhaps, you know,

00:56:47.480 as people use it, they're

00:56:49.480 referring to the Jewish

00:56:51.200 situation specifically,

00:56:53.240 never again.

00:56:54.580 But clearly it's going to

00:56:56.200 happen again, because it's

00:56:57.200 happening now, and we're

00:56:59.260 letting it happen, and we're

00:57:00.720 okay with it.

00:57:02.280 So that's your government

00:57:04.280 right there.

00:57:05.260 Now, I don't know that Trump

00:57:06.160 would have handled it

00:57:06.860 differently.

00:57:09.000 I'd like to think he would,

00:57:10.280 but I don't know that.

00:57:13.560 And of course, then there

00:57:14.640 was the Taiwan question, and

00:57:16.480 Xi warned against, I guess,

00:57:20.120 Biden warned China against

00:57:22.500 doing anything unilaterally,

00:57:24.260 or blah, blah, blah.

00:57:25.220 No, he warned, no, I guess

00:57:26.540 Xi warned Biden against doing

00:57:28.580 anything unilaterally about

00:57:30.360 the status of Taiwan.

00:57:32.240 A Danish newspaper reported

00:57:34.140 that Biden assured China that

00:57:36.200 U.S. recognizes Taiwan to be a

00:57:37.940 part of China.

00:57:40.640 A Danish newspaper reported

00:57:44.000 this as fact, that Biden

00:57:47.140 said, yeah, China, we

00:57:48.660 recognize Taiwan as part of

00:57:49.920 China.

00:57:50.840 Now, I didn't believe that

00:57:52.120 until I asked somebody on

00:57:54.020 Twitter to send me the

00:57:54.940 headline.

00:57:56.220 Sure enough, I mean, he had

00:57:57.680 translate on Google, and

00:57:59.000 there it is.

00:58:00.400 Yep.

00:58:01.300 The Danes believe that Biden

00:58:04.820 just gave Taiwan to China.

00:58:06.720 I mean, obviously, I'm

00:58:08.360 framing it wrong, but you

00:58:10.100 know what I mean.

00:58:11.620 I'd like a word with the

00:58:12.760 interpreters, because I

00:58:14.680 wonder if there was an

00:58:15.740 interpretation problem.

00:58:18.440 You wonder how they could get

00:58:19.780 to that level of fake news.

00:58:21.000 All right, Rasmussen has a new

00:58:27.420 poll.

00:58:27.940 Did I tell you there was going

00:58:28.840 to be something shocking

00:58:29.920 coming out today?

00:58:31.700 Here's something shocking.

00:58:35.240 In a poll, people were asked if

00:58:39.520 they would favor the GOP or the

00:58:41.560 Democrat candidate for the House

00:58:44.100 and the Senate in the midterm

00:58:45.240 elections.

00:58:45.720 And the GOP is favored by 13

00:58:50.580 points.

00:58:52.600 13 point difference in what

00:58:55.860 voters say they would vote for

00:58:57.760 in 2022.

00:59:01.160 13 points.

00:59:03.080 And that doesn't count the

00:59:04.480 retirements, because there could

00:59:06.260 be a lot of Democrat retirements,

00:59:07.800 apparently, that have been

00:59:08.840 announced or assumed.

00:59:10.860 2022 is just going to be a

00:59:16.240 tsunami, it looks like.

00:59:18.220 Now, I mean, you could say, you

00:59:20.520 know, you can't trust polls and

00:59:21.900 there's plenty of time to go, and

00:59:23.160 that's all true.

00:59:25.380 But then I also saw that in the

00:59:27.060 same poll, that 30 percent of

00:59:28.520 black citizens would vote

00:59:31.280 Republican.

00:59:33.140 30 percent.

00:59:34.540 Does that seem high to you?

00:59:36.440 Apparently, it's been as high as

00:59:37.620 40 percent in the past.

00:59:38.720 But 30 percent seems high,

00:59:41.120 doesn't it?

00:59:45.220 Yeah.

00:59:47.620 So, there's that.

00:59:49.400 All right.

00:59:51.340 I told you that quantum

00:59:52.840 computing might be a problem

00:59:54.020 because it can break

00:59:54.780 encryption, but the smart people

00:59:56.780 in that world told me that we

00:59:59.880 now have encryption that can't be

01:00:02.180 broken by the quantum

01:00:04.020 computers.

01:00:04.600 And even the quantum we have

01:00:07.340 now, it's 100 qubits, it'd have

01:00:09.080 to be 2,000 qubits to break our

01:00:10.780 current stuff, and that's not

01:00:14.020 going to happen right away.

01:00:15.020 So, basically, there's a, you

01:00:17.040 know, there's a continuous war of

01:00:18.580 the encryptors versus the, you

01:00:20.780 know, the people who can break

01:00:21.760 encryption.

01:00:22.500 And so far, the encryptors are

01:00:24.120 ahead.

01:00:25.080 So, we don't have to worry that

01:00:26.640 much about quantum computing

01:00:28.100 breaking encryption.

01:00:29.980 That is my show for the day.

01:00:31.860 I've got to go do other

01:00:32.840 things.

01:00:34.300 I hope you enjoyed this, the,

01:00:35.880 hope you enjoyed the swearing.

01:00:43.300 Overconfidence can be fatal.

01:00:45.020 True.

01:00:47.040 Oh, actually, 50 million qubits,

01:00:49.360 you say.

01:00:50.120 I guess it depends which

01:00:51.020 encryption you're going to try

01:00:52.100 to break.

01:00:52.860 That's all for now.

01:00:53.820 Talk to you later.

01:00:54.380 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 16, 2021

Episode 1563 Scott Adams： I Will Tell You Which Public Figures Are Lying to You Today. Spoiler： Most of Them

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript