Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1563 Scott Adams： I Will Tell You Which Public Figures Are Lying to You Today. Spoiler： Most of Them

00:00:00.200 Good morning, everybody.

00:00:02.420 By the way, do you know why I always open a drawer

00:00:04.920 and take out my notes before I do the simultaneous ep?

00:00:09.220 It's not because, just because I don't remember it.

00:00:13.460 That's part of it.

00:00:14.840 But it's also...

00:00:16.600 I'm seeing funny memes go by on the Locals platform.

00:00:21.300 By the way, Locals has in their comments,

00:00:23.860 you can embed memes and pictures.

00:00:26.460 So the Locals' comment stream is freaking hilarious

00:00:31.580 compared to the YouTube stream, which is just text.

00:00:36.540 But when you look at the Locals' feed, it's hard not to laugh.

00:00:41.800 All right, so the reason that I always do this,

00:00:45.560 sometimes YouTube clips off this part,

00:00:49.160 but let me tell you why I do it.

00:00:52.280 So listen to it again, see if you can hear it.

00:00:56.460 It's basically an introduction.

00:01:01.800 So it's also a trigger, or a key, as we say in hypnosis.

00:01:06.500 If you hear it every time, it should,

00:01:09.560 if you like the content from prior shows,

00:01:12.700 it should put you immediately in the headspace.

00:01:15.680 So it's sort of a trick

00:01:16.900 to put you in the right frame of mind by repetition.

00:01:20.840 Same as really any theme music for any show.

00:01:24.820 It's the same idea.

00:01:26.520 So all kinds of stuff going on today.

00:01:30.580 I'm going to be cursing a little bit.

00:01:34.220 There will be some cursing coming up.

00:01:36.880 So this would not be the one that you want to share

00:01:39.400 with your sensitive friends and or children.

00:01:44.400 Well, let's say children who are not familiar with swear words.

00:01:51.220 I'm pretty sure any kid under 14 or older is going to be fine.

00:01:55.920 And you probably shouldn't show this to anybody who's under 14.

00:01:59.580 But anybody over 14 has heard all the words, right?

00:02:02.860 By the way, have you ever heard 14-year-olds talk to each other?

00:02:05.560 It's a lot worse than what I say.

00:02:09.600 So they're not going to be damaged by it.

00:02:11.640 But anyway, that's just your warning.

00:02:13.360 But first topic is, I'll be swearing on the very next topic,

00:02:17.600 in case you're wondering.

00:02:19.640 The very next topic, we'll have some anger and cursing. 0.99

00:02:23.440 And then we'll get back into the fun stuff.

00:02:25.780 But first, there might be an Alzheimer vaccination.

00:02:29.680 According to the Telegraph,

00:02:31.540 there's a vaccine against Alzheimer's disease.

00:02:34.200 It could be on the horizon, because it's worked in mice.

00:02:37.620 They actually...

00:02:40.200 Yeah, I see your comment, Carpe.

00:02:44.800 I'll get back to that.

00:02:48.000 And it actually reversed memory loss in mice.

00:02:53.060 What?

00:02:53.900 How do you reverse memory loss?

00:02:56.460 How do you even do that?

00:02:58.420 Apparently, that's the thing.

00:03:01.080 Oh, oh, there's something wrong.

00:03:02.900 I have done something very bad.

00:03:07.900 You know what it is, right?

00:03:10.000 Yes, you do.

00:03:12.800 Let's fix this.

00:03:14.100 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:03:16.000 a tank or a gel, just a dine, a canteen jug or a flask,

00:03:18.380 a vessel of any kind.

00:03:20.900 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:03:22.820 I like coffee.

00:03:24.460 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:03:27.140 the dopamine hit of the day,

00:03:29.060 the thing that makes everything better,

00:03:30.520 except your memory, apparently.

00:03:32.940 It's called the simultaneous sip,

00:03:35.280 and it happens now.

00:03:35.880 Go.

00:03:36.040 Go.

00:03:40.420 Oh.

00:03:42.960 I don't know how I went so long without that.

00:03:47.460 But now all systems are operating 100%.

00:03:51.740 So, yes, there's this vaccination, allegedly,

00:03:56.760 that works on animals that gives them their memory back.

00:04:00.880 Now, and the story goes on to describe exactly how they do it,

00:04:05.400 and it actually sounds like something that works.

00:04:08.500 They found the exact problem with the memory,

00:04:10.820 and they reproduced a, well, they created a vaccine

00:04:13.820 that operates directly against that memory loss element.

00:04:19.980 Well, here are a few thoughts on this.

00:04:24.200 Number one, why are we calling this a vaccination?

00:04:29.460 Anybody?

00:04:31.280 Did you notice I slipped that in?

00:04:33.080 Did you uncritically accept that this was a vaccination?

00:04:40.380 Did any of you say, vaccination?

00:04:43.620 That doesn't sound like a vaccination, does it?

00:04:49.060 All right.

00:04:49.920 Well, I guess it could be used as a preventive,

00:04:52.880 so it could be a prophylactic.

00:04:54.480 If you get the shot,

00:04:55.760 they're thinking that maybe it might actually be a vaccination.

00:04:59.420 It might actually be an actual vaccination.

00:05:02.320 that prevents you from getting Alzheimer's,

00:05:04.620 but I don't think so.

00:05:06.440 I think what they're looking at

00:05:07.760 is something that makes it a lot better.

00:05:10.840 Right?

00:05:12.300 Because I don't think they're saying

00:05:14.080 that we think if you take this vaccination,

00:05:16.480 you'll never get Alzheimer's.

00:05:18.620 I think they're saying if you get the vaccination,

00:05:20.820 it might not affect you as much.

00:05:23.460 So you've noticed that the definition of a vaccination

00:05:26.200 has just completely changed.

00:05:28.200 Now, vaccination and therapeutic

00:05:29.980 are basically the same thing.

00:05:32.320 At this point, what makes it a vaccination

00:05:34.260 is that they give it to you in a shot.

00:05:37.920 Am I wrong?

00:05:39.380 I think at this point,

00:05:40.480 we're going to call anything in a shot

00:05:42.320 a vaccination,

00:05:44.060 if it helps at all.

00:05:46.580 So I don't know if that's meaningful or not,

00:05:49.480 but words have just started to drift in meaning,

00:05:53.480 maybe more than usual.

00:05:55.340 Here's the funniest comment

00:05:56.480 on this Alzheimer vaccination article

00:05:58.980 from James Feffery.

00:06:02.820 Or Pefeffery.

00:06:04.260 I don't know how to...

00:06:05.740 His last name starts with PF.

00:06:09.020 Which one is silent?

00:06:10.220 The F or the P?

00:06:10.920 P-F-E-F-F-E-R-L-E. 1.00

00:06:17.380 Pfefferly?

00:06:19.940 Pfefferly?

00:06:20.960 Well, anyway, James Pfefferly

00:06:23.440 says that about the Alzheimer vaccination,

00:06:27.900 Biden gets his mind back.

00:06:29.440 Hilarity soon follows.

00:06:31.760 I did what?

00:06:32.720 This is a pretty funny comment.

00:06:38.460 You can imagine Biden getting the shot

00:06:41.140 two years from now or something. 0.93

00:06:43.580 He gets the shot,

00:06:44.860 and you see Biden sitting there,

00:06:45.980 he gets the shot,

00:06:46.660 and he goes,

00:06:48.100 wait, I did what?

00:06:53.740 Now, if I've taught you,

00:06:57.280 and I think I've taught many of you

00:06:58.800 how to write jokes, right?

00:07:00.180 How many of you have seen any of my tutorials

00:07:02.140 about writing humor?

00:07:03.840 I guess most of them have been

00:07:04.960 on the locals' platform,

00:07:06.320 so I don't think the YouTubers have seen them.

00:07:08.600 But one of the tricks of writing humor

00:07:10.200 is that you create a situation

00:07:12.480 where people can fill out

00:07:14.880 the punchline in their mind.

00:07:17.140 So you give them the boost,

00:07:18.560 you know, the little,

00:07:19.700 you know, imagining Biden saying,

00:07:21.840 quote, I did what?

00:07:23.700 But the beauty of that punchline

00:07:25.460 is that it makes you imagine

00:07:27.660 the full scene, right?

00:07:29.800 So the scene that you put in there

00:07:31.420 is in your own mind.

00:07:32.340 It's not in the joke.

00:07:33.980 The joke is just this one line.

00:07:35.400 I did what?

00:07:35.980 And then you just imagine

00:07:37.040 the fullness of the scene.

00:07:38.440 That is a good joke.

00:07:41.760 Right?

00:07:42.080 You can't beat that form of humor

00:07:43.920 where somebody has to recreate

00:07:45.580 the details in their head

00:07:46.580 from your punchline.

00:07:47.340 So there's your humor writing trick

00:07:51.320 for the day.

00:07:52.860 I'd like to get into

00:07:54.000 a little bit of swearing next.

00:07:58.320 Have you heard of a book

00:07:59.900 called White Fragility?

00:08:03.600 White Fragility? 0.99

00:08:04.960 And you've heard the term, right? 0.91

00:08:06.040 White Fragility. 0.99

00:08:07.960 I think it has to do with, you know, 0.98

00:08:09.440 white people feeling bad

00:08:10.840 if anybody else gets some good stuff.

00:08:14.080 Something like that.

00:08:14.700 You know that's racist, right? 0.99

00:08:20.540 White Fragility. 0.99

00:08:21.820 You couldn't say that 0.90

00:08:22.540 about anybody else.

00:08:24.120 That's purely racist.

00:08:26.420 It's not even a little bit racist.

00:08:28.880 This is like the old school,

00:08:30.680 you know,

00:08:30.920 no systemic anything here.

00:08:33.240 Direct racism.

00:08:36.080 Well, apparently,

00:08:37.180 since we haven't,

00:08:38.260 we meaning anybody

00:08:39.700 anybody who doesn't like that

00:08:41.680 has not pushed back on that.

00:08:44.480 I got a comment today

00:08:45.980 on Twitter.

00:08:48.100 It doesn't even matter

00:08:49.260 what the topic was.

00:08:50.580 But the comment to me

00:08:52.040 was that

00:08:52.780 white eggs

00:08:54.560 have the softest shells.

00:08:57.980 It was a comment

00:08:58.960 about my

00:08:59.820 ethnicity

00:09:01.960 and a suggestion

00:09:04.420 that I'm

00:09:05.200 extra sensitive

00:09:06.580 because I'm white.

00:09:10.120 So I responded back, 0.98

00:09:12.680 you racist 1.00

00:09:13.340 piece of shit. 1.00

00:09:15.280 You know, 1.00

00:09:16.160 I don't know

00:09:17.660 what too far

00:09:18.640 looks like.

00:09:20.440 Right?

00:09:20.880 You know that

00:09:21.320 I identify as black

00:09:22.520 because I've been

00:09:23.360 discriminated against

00:09:24.460 so severely

00:09:25.260 in my life.

00:09:26.380 That's not a joke.

00:09:27.280 If anybody's new to me,

00:09:29.360 none of that's a joke.

00:09:30.300 I literally identify

00:09:32.020 as black

00:09:32.620 because I can. 0.52

00:09:33.440 Those are the rules.

00:09:35.260 The rules are

00:09:36.120 I can identify

00:09:36.940 anyone I want

00:09:37.820 and that's who

00:09:38.280 I identify with the most.

00:09:39.560 And also,

00:09:40.000 I like to be

00:09:40.400 on the winning team.

00:09:43.080 If I have a choice

00:09:44.400 of being on the winning team

00:09:46.440 or the losing team,

00:09:47.540 why would you pick

00:09:49.000 the losing team?

00:09:50.400 So I pick

00:09:50.920 the winning team.

00:09:52.480 I think black Americans

00:09:53.720 are ascending,

00:09:54.660 white Americans

00:09:55.240 are descending,

00:09:56.360 and I like to get

00:09:57.340 some of those benefits.

00:09:58.320 I'm allowed.

00:10:01.060 The rules allow me

00:10:02.320 to do that,

00:10:02.920 so I'd like to get

00:10:03.560 some of those benefits.

00:10:05.420 And you should too

00:10:06.400 because it's available

00:10:07.440 to everybody

00:10:08.060 and nobody is excluded

00:10:09.820 from defining

00:10:10.880 their own situation.

00:10:14.640 But I would like

00:10:16.720 to say this

00:10:17.360 to all the people

00:10:18.320 who would like

00:10:19.060 to get away

00:10:19.920 with calling

00:10:20.400 white people

00:10:21.040 who I don't identify with,

00:10:22.720 but I still support

00:10:23.820 their struggle.

00:10:25.640 When you say

00:10:28.880 white eggs

00:10:29.460 are the softest shells, 1.00

00:10:30.760 fuck you. 1.00

00:10:32.120 Fuck you. 1.00

00:10:33.680 Fuck your family. 1.00

00:10:35.900 Fuck you. 1.00

00:10:36.840 Every article, 1.00

00:10:37.920 every particle 1.00

00:10:38.620 in your fucking 1.00

00:10:39.700 racist piece 1.00

00:10:40.600 of shit body. 1.00

00:10:42.300 Fuck you completely. 1.00

00:10:44.480 Drop dead. 1.00

00:10:46.100 All right? 1.00

00:10:46.500 If you can go

00:10:47.480 in public 1.00

00:10:48.080 and say racist bullshit 1.00

00:10:50.140 directly, 1.00

00:10:51.440 not even hinting at it, 1.00

00:10:53.380 fuck you. 1.00

00:10:54.300 And if you want 1.00

00:10:55.620 to see how

00:10:56.460 fragile

00:10:59.080 my shell is, 0.99

00:11:02.140 don't fucking push me 0.99

00:11:05.360 because you're 1.00

00:11:06.400 going to find out.

00:11:08.400 So anytime you see this,

00:11:10.680 you know,

00:11:11.180 the white fragility 0.95

00:11:12.440 and, you know, 0.68

00:11:13.920 white people 0.84

00:11:14.380 are sensitive 0.93

00:11:14.920 and even the Karen stuff.

00:11:16.920 By the way,

00:11:17.520 I think white people

00:11:18.300 should be able

00:11:18.860 to call white women

00:11:20.520 Karens.

00:11:22.160 Nobody else.

00:11:24.300 Nobody else.

00:11:26.340 Who's with me?

00:11:27.840 And again,

00:11:28.300 I don't identify

00:11:29.500 as a white person,

00:11:30.420 so I'm just supporting

00:11:31.880 the struggle

00:11:32.760 of the people

00:11:33.380 who are.

00:11:35.200 I'm going to start

00:11:35.980 using the N-word.

00:11:37.960 I'm going to start

00:11:38.720 using the N-word

00:11:39.440 because, first of all,

00:11:40.460 I identify as black.

00:11:42.020 But secondly,

00:11:42.980 if white women 1.00

00:11:45.080 can be called Karens,

00:11:47.440 and that's okay

00:11:48.100 with everybody,

00:11:49.300 everybody's okay

00:11:49.980 with that,

00:11:50.380 don't push it.

00:11:54.580 Now,

00:11:55.040 I've been very much

00:11:55.920 in favor of the N-word

00:11:57.040 being excluded

00:11:58.260 from civilized society.

00:12:01.120 It's a horrible word.

00:12:02.940 It should be banned forever.

00:12:04.940 Now,

00:12:05.160 of course,

00:12:05.680 you know,

00:12:05.900 free speech,

00:12:06.500 of course,

00:12:06.780 can't ban it.

00:12:08.020 But in terms of

00:12:09.120 what feels right

00:12:10.260 as, you know,

00:12:11.020 a human being,

00:12:12.260 like,

00:12:12.520 I don't ever want

00:12:13.160 to hear that word.

00:12:16.040 So I'm okay

00:12:16.920 with that

00:12:17.200 as an exception,

00:12:18.220 right?

00:12:18.440 It's like a minor exception.

00:12:21.280 But I feel like

00:12:22.960 there's a little bit

00:12:24.160 of taking advantage

00:12:25.000 going on here,

00:12:26.000 don't you think?

00:12:28.080 So,

00:12:28.900 for those of you

00:12:29.900 who'd like to call

00:12:30.660 white people Karens

00:12:31.940 and fragile, 1.00

00:12:33.060 fuck you, 1.00

00:12:33.680 you pieces of racist shit. 1.00

00:12:37.680 Moving on. 1.00

00:12:40.360 Biden's slogan,

00:12:41.560 Build Back Better,

00:12:43.920 there was an observation

00:12:46.240 by Spike Cohen

00:12:47.480 on Twitter

00:12:48.820 who makes this observation.

00:12:51.700 So Build Back Better.

00:12:53.880 Build,

00:12:54.480 what would be

00:12:54.900 another word for build?

00:12:56.600 To build something.

00:12:58.260 Make, right?

00:12:59.200 You make something

00:13:00.000 or you build it.

00:13:01.420 Kind of similar.

00:13:03.040 What would be

00:13:03.780 another word for back

00:13:05.580 as it's used in this?

00:13:06.820 We're not talking

00:13:07.460 about the back

00:13:08.020 on your body,

00:13:09.220 but back in this context

00:13:10.840 means historically back.

00:13:13.940 You know,

00:13:14.160 to take us back

00:13:15.160 to something.

00:13:16.940 Sort of like again.

00:13:19.280 Yeah,

00:13:19.620 it's sort of like again.

00:13:21.440 We'll do back.

00:13:22.780 It's like again.

00:13:24.360 And then better,

00:13:26.520 what would be

00:13:26.980 another word for better?

00:13:30.260 Sort of a synonym

00:13:31.480 for better.

00:13:32.640 Oh, great.

00:13:33.800 If you did something

00:13:34.760 better than it was,

00:13:35.800 it's probably great.

00:13:36.540 So literally,

00:13:39.400 Build Back Better

00:13:40.060 is just make

00:13:41.060 America great again.

00:13:46.120 I mean,

00:13:46.700 it leaves out

00:13:47.100 the America part

00:13:47.920 because the Dems

00:13:48.880 don't like America

00:13:49.880 as much.

00:13:50.980 But

00:13:51.220 all it is

00:13:53.280 is just a copy of,

00:13:54.820 it's literally

00:13:55.340 just a copy of

00:13:56.520 Make America Great Again.

00:13:58.420 They just changed

00:13:58.980 the words.

00:14:00.060 And somehow

00:14:00.560 I didn't notice.

00:14:01.340 How did I go

00:14:03.400 this long

00:14:03.880 without noticing

00:14:04.640 that it's just

00:14:05.640 it's just MAGA?

00:14:07.680 How did we do that?

00:14:09.100 Did any of you

00:14:09.660 notice before this?

00:14:11.440 How in the world

00:14:12.400 did we not notice this?

00:14:15.000 Isn't that freaky?

00:14:18.240 It's freaky.

00:14:19.660 Like,

00:14:19.880 it's my job

00:14:20.600 to notice this stuff,

00:14:21.880 right?

00:14:22.100 Because I'm a word guy.

00:14:23.980 It's literally

00:14:24.680 my job to notice.

00:14:25.680 I didn't see it.

00:14:27.260 So good,

00:14:27.860 good observation,

00:14:29.060 Spike Cohen.

00:14:29.840 All right,

00:14:32.980 because I'm

00:14:33.700 fair and balanced,

00:14:34.960 I will tell you

00:14:35.660 the fake news

00:14:36.340 on CNN,

00:14:37.640 but I will also

00:14:38.720 tell you the fake news

00:14:39.660 on Fox News.

00:14:41.480 Do you think

00:14:42.280 that Fox News

00:14:42.980 ever has any fake news?

00:14:46.760 Well,

00:14:47.440 you be the judge.

00:14:48.960 So here's

00:14:49.520 a Fox News headline.

00:14:52.180 So,

00:14:52.780 first of all,

00:14:53.320 some background.

00:14:54.260 So Kamala Harris

00:14:55.060 appeared at an event

00:14:56.320 with Biden

00:14:56.960 and

00:14:57.540 some other

00:14:59.580 person was introduced

00:15:00.780 as Kamala Harris

00:15:02.560 goes to the lectern.

00:15:04.760 So Kamala

00:15:05.340 walks up to the lectern

00:15:06.900 and then the voice

00:15:08.660 of God,

00:15:09.240 you know,

00:15:09.460 the announcer says,

00:15:11.480 introducing,

00:15:12.740 and then it was

00:15:13.220 just some other person

00:15:14.100 that they were going

00:15:15.300 to introduce after her.

00:15:17.200 Now,

00:15:18.880 I saw Kamala Harris

00:15:20.020 getting mocked

00:15:20.720 by the conservatives

00:15:21.880 for,

00:15:22.540 you know,

00:15:23.140 being dissed

00:15:24.500 and being,

00:15:25.500 you know,

00:15:25.800 in this awkward situation.

00:15:27.020 But I had a completely

00:15:28.740 different take on it.

00:15:30.640 And I'm not sure why.

00:15:31.620 I mean,

00:15:31.840 obviously it's subjective.

00:15:33.560 But my take on it

00:15:34.640 is that she handled it perfectly.

00:15:36.600 Actually,

00:15:37.040 one of the best things

00:15:37.800 I've seen her do in public.

00:15:40.660 Do you disagree?

00:15:42.260 Here's what I saw.

00:15:43.560 So,

00:15:43.940 she didn't create 1.00

00:15:45.020 the situation,

00:15:45.860 right?

00:15:46.340 She was cast

00:15:47.240 into the situation.

00:15:48.580 She gets up there,

00:15:49.400 she's ready to talk,

00:15:50.340 and then the voice

00:15:50.980 introduces a different person.

00:15:52.460 Instead of looking shook up,

00:15:56.620 she smiled,

00:15:58.340 and here's a little

00:15:59.620 public speaking tip for you.

00:16:02.740 The pause.

00:16:04.740 The pause.

00:16:06.460 There is nothing harder

00:16:08.060 than pausing for two seconds

00:16:11.480 when something like that happens.

00:16:13.840 Because the pause

00:16:14.800 gives you time to think.

00:16:16.660 But you don't give yourself

00:16:18.380 that pause

00:16:18.980 when you're in front of a crowd.

00:16:20.560 Usually you just start talking, 0.94

00:16:21.720 and something silly comes out. 0.74

00:16:23.820 But she paused. 0.94

00:16:25.720 Now,

00:16:26.060 that's the first time

00:16:27.280 I've seen poise

00:16:30.160 of the professional kind

00:16:33.220 that you'd expect

00:16:33.800 from a top-level politician.

00:16:36.560 She paused,

00:16:38.520 and then what was her,

00:16:40.400 then her quote was, 0.97

00:16:41.560 she goes,

00:16:42.200 she smiles and she goes,

00:16:43.660 in a moment.

00:16:45.360 And then she goes on

00:16:46.360 with the thing.

00:16:47.900 It was kind of perfect.

00:16:49.820 Kind of perfect.

00:16:51.140 Right?

00:16:51.280 Now,

00:16:51.720 if you're not familiar

00:16:53.900 with my commentary,

00:16:56.760 I've been just brutal

00:16:58.780 about Kamala Harris's

00:17:00.880 public persona.

00:17:02.780 It's just so cringey.

00:17:04.240 Just horrible,

00:17:05.200 most of the time.

00:17:05.800 Worst I've ever seen,

00:17:06.760 honestly.

00:17:07.480 It's honestly the worst

00:17:08.420 I've ever seen.

00:17:09.340 But in this moment,

00:17:10.840 I thought she handled it

00:17:12.720 as well as that could be handled.

00:17:14.840 I don't think that could have been better.

00:17:15.920 Anyway,

00:17:18.200 here's how Fox News

00:17:19.300 writes about it.

00:17:22.100 Now,

00:17:22.360 you should also know

00:17:23.080 that CNN had a

00:17:24.300 really critical report

00:17:26.360 of Kamala Harris yesterday.

00:17:28.020 All right?

00:17:28.280 So,

00:17:28.920 that's your background.

00:17:30.360 Here's Fox News headline.

00:17:32.300 White House announcer

00:17:33.140 appears to skip

00:17:34.520 Kamala Harris

00:17:35.420 at infrastructure bill signing

00:17:37.460 after disastrous

00:17:38.980 CNN report.

00:17:39.920 So,

00:17:41.440 the White House announcer

00:17:42.240 appears to skip her

00:17:43.600 after the disastrous

00:17:45.520 CNN report.

00:17:47.760 Do you think

00:17:48.740 that these things

00:17:49.600 are connected?

00:17:51.040 Do you think

00:17:51.620 there's a connection

00:17:52.380 between the CNN report

00:17:53.780 and the White House

00:17:55.360 announcer skipping her? 0.80

00:17:57.600 No.

00:17:58.900 No.

00:17:59.780 There's no connection.

00:18:01.800 And then you get

00:18:03.160 to the bottom

00:18:03.660 of the article

00:18:04.220 and it even says,

00:18:05.840 well,

00:18:05.980 there's probably

00:18:06.300 no connection.

00:18:07.600 It's probably

00:18:08.080 just a mistake

00:18:08.900 in the announcer

00:18:10.360 and there's nothing

00:18:10.960 else there.

00:18:11.940 So,

00:18:12.340 they write this whole

00:18:13.020 fake news headline

00:18:14.940 to make you think

00:18:15.880 that maybe

00:18:16.320 the White House

00:18:17.000 has turned against

00:18:17.860 Kamala Harris

00:18:18.560 so much

00:18:19.740 that they're not even

00:18:20.960 going to introduce

00:18:21.660 her right. 0.98

00:18:23.240 That didn't happen.

00:18:25.180 Nothing like that

00:18:26.080 happened.

00:18:27.120 The headline

00:18:27.640 is pure fake news.

00:18:29.880 And if they cover

00:18:30.800 this accurately,

00:18:32.480 they'd say

00:18:32.840 the announcer

00:18:33.380 made a mistake

00:18:34.180 and Harris

00:18:35.540 adeptly

00:18:37.260 handled it.

00:18:38.900 That should have

00:18:40.060 been the news.

00:18:41.420 The news should have

00:18:42.180 been the announcer

00:18:42.780 made a mistake

00:18:43.440 and the Vice

00:18:45.480 President adeptly,

00:18:46.940 adeptly

00:18:48.000 handled it.

00:18:50.260 Now,

00:18:51.360 I saw a tweet

00:18:53.100 from Ed Latimer

00:18:54.960 the other day

00:18:55.860 about steel man

00:18:57.880 arguments.

00:19:00.140 And a steel man

00:19:01.080 argument is when

00:19:01.920 you argue the

00:19:03.080 other side

00:19:04.040 as convincingly

00:19:05.740 as possible

00:19:06.340 before you give

00:19:07.600 your counterpoint.

00:19:09.540 So if you can't

00:19:10.240 describe the other

00:19:11.100 side's argument

00:19:11.940 perfectly,

00:19:13.740 your debate

00:19:14.840 against it

00:19:15.400 really is weak

00:19:16.440 because you're not

00:19:17.300 even debating

00:19:18.040 the right thing.

00:19:19.040 You're debating

00:19:19.560 a straw man.

00:19:20.920 So if you can't

00:19:22.300 say something good

00:19:23.860 legitimately

00:19:25.240 about the other

00:19:26.860 team,

00:19:27.960 nobody should

00:19:28.560 take you seriously.

00:19:29.500 I won't.

00:19:32.300 If I see you

00:19:33.200 say nothing good

00:19:34.000 about the other

00:19:34.500 side ever,

00:19:35.360 I don't take you

00:19:36.160 seriously.

00:19:37.660 Just know that.

00:19:39.360 Just know that I

00:19:40.200 will never take you

00:19:41.040 seriously if you

00:19:41.960 can't say something

00:19:42.980 good about the

00:19:44.320 other side.

00:19:45.420 Something.

00:19:46.280 Because there's

00:19:46.780 always something,

00:19:48.020 right?

00:19:48.840 If you can't say

00:19:49.620 anything good,

00:19:50.980 you're probably an NPC.

00:19:52.280 All right.

00:19:54.420 So that was my

00:19:56.260 saying something

00:19:56.840 good about Harris.

00:19:57.780 So the next time

00:19:58.460 I criticize her,

00:19:59.540 you should put

00:20:00.000 that in context.

00:20:01.440 And I will.

00:20:03.940 Here's a question

00:20:04.740 for you.

00:20:05.540 Name a Biden

00:20:06.200 success,

00:20:07.500 and you know,

00:20:08.060 success is

00:20:08.700 subjective,

00:20:09.620 right?

00:20:10.180 But name a Biden

00:20:11.140 success as president

00:20:12.180 that wouldn't have

00:20:13.700 happened anyway,

00:20:14.820 just on its own,

00:20:15.800 no matter who

00:20:16.480 was president.

00:20:17.820 Name something

00:20:18.300 he did that

00:20:19.040 wouldn't have

00:20:19.420 happened just

00:20:20.080 anyway.

00:20:20.420 Would the

00:20:21.960 stock market

00:20:22.600 have gone up?

00:20:25.120 Probably.

00:20:26.600 Probably.

00:20:28.080 Now, I gave

00:20:28.860 Trump credit

00:20:31.100 for the stock

00:20:31.680 market because

00:20:32.320 he cut taxes

00:20:33.200 or was planning

00:20:33.860 to cut taxes

00:20:34.580 and then did.

00:20:35.760 And he also

00:20:36.700 directly talked

00:20:37.700 it up,

00:20:38.700 which is actually

00:20:39.900 good technique

00:20:40.680 because stock

00:20:41.360 markets and

00:20:42.400 the economy

00:20:42.880 itself work on

00:20:43.960 persuasion and

00:20:45.620 psychology.

00:20:47.500 So there was

00:20:48.020 a reason that

00:20:49.900 you could quite

00:20:50.540 see,

00:20:51.120 you could see

00:20:51.500 the connection.

00:20:52.700 Trump did

00:20:53.240 X,

00:20:53.880 the stock

00:20:54.320 market,

00:20:54.860 you know,

00:20:55.440 responded.

00:20:56.720 So in that

00:20:57.380 case,

00:20:57.660 I think you

00:20:58.120 could say

00:20:58.540 Trump gets

00:20:59.440 some of the

00:21:00.180 credit,

00:21:00.940 but maybe

00:21:01.240 not all of

00:21:01.800 it,

00:21:02.040 right?

00:21:02.700 Because the

00:21:03.280 economy tends

00:21:04.060 to go up

00:21:04.580 over time.

00:21:06.160 But I don't

00:21:06.820 see anything

00:21:07.440 that Biden

00:21:07.900 did that

00:21:08.320 would be

00:21:08.560 good for

00:21:08.860 the stock

00:21:09.280 market,

00:21:09.720 did you?

00:21:10.680 What would

00:21:11.220 be the

00:21:11.520 argument that

00:21:12.220 Biden did

00:21:12.760 something to

00:21:13.260 help the

00:21:13.620 stock market?

00:21:14.680 Anything?

00:21:15.860 The

00:21:16.260 infrastructure bill?

00:21:17.280 Does that

00:21:17.580 help the

00:21:17.960 stock market?

00:21:18.440 I don't

00:21:19.660 know,

00:21:19.860 does it?

00:21:21.420 You're

00:21:21.820 saying

00:21:22.020 infrastructure,

00:21:23.100 but isn't

00:21:23.720 there just

00:21:24.140 as much

00:21:24.520 argument that

00:21:25.220 it hurts

00:21:25.520 the economy

00:21:26.040 because of

00:21:26.780 the spending?

00:21:28.960 I don't

00:21:29.200 know,

00:21:29.480 and that

00:21:29.700 you're

00:21:29.880 spending on

00:21:30.320 the wrong

00:21:30.620 things in

00:21:31.120 some cases.

00:21:32.340 So okay,

00:21:32.880 I'll give

00:21:33.200 you that.

00:21:34.540 I'll give

00:21:35.140 you infrastructure,

00:21:36.140 but here's the

00:21:36.740 second point.

00:21:37.840 Don't you

00:21:38.280 think the

00:21:38.620 infrastructure deal

00:21:39.520 would have

00:21:39.820 happened anyway?

00:21:41.620 I do.

00:21:42.940 See,

00:21:43.220 I think

00:21:43.460 Congress kicked

00:21:44.240 that can down 0.77

00:21:44.940 the road as

00:21:45.460 long as they

00:21:45.900 can kick it,

00:21:46.580 and then

00:21:46.880 something was

00:21:47.560 going to

00:21:47.800 happen.

00:21:49.060 Now,

00:21:49.580 of course,

00:21:50.220 they needed

00:21:50.620 the Democratic

00:21:52.620 majority,

00:21:54.080 but they also

00:21:54.520 needed some

00:21:55.060 Republicans to

00:21:56.040 cross the

00:21:57.420 line.

00:21:57.660 I feel like

00:21:58.840 that just

00:21:59.260 would have

00:21:59.580 happened anyway,

00:22:00.900 because you

00:22:01.180 can't go

00:22:02.660 forever without

00:22:03.560 doing a bill

00:22:04.320 on the most

00:22:05.620 important things

00:22:06.260 in the country.

00:22:07.520 Congress just

00:22:08.300 can't go

00:22:08.740 forever.

00:22:09.800 They've got to

00:22:10.240 do it someday,

00:22:11.640 so it just

00:22:12.340 happened now.

00:22:13.500 How about the

00:22:14.020 employment numbers?

00:22:14.960 I don't think

00:22:16.220 Biden had

00:22:16.660 anything to

00:22:17.160 do with

00:22:17.420 that,

00:22:18.340 so that

00:22:18.780 probably would

00:22:19.320 have been

00:22:19.500 fine.

00:22:20.140 How about

00:22:20.460 vaccinations?

00:22:22.180 I don't

00:22:22.540 know.

00:22:23.480 Are they

00:22:23.940 better or

00:22:24.540 worse?

00:22:25.440 Has Biden

00:22:26.180 handled the

00:22:26.860 pandemic better

00:22:28.240 or worse than

00:22:28.900 Trump?

00:22:29.300 Who knows?

00:22:31.140 How about

00:22:31.920 Afghan pull-out? 0.83

00:22:33.780 It was literally

00:22:34.420 scheduled under

00:22:35.280 Trump's

00:22:35.680 administration.

00:22:37.140 We imagine

00:22:37.980 Trump would

00:22:38.500 have done

00:22:38.760 better, but we

00:22:39.400 don't know.

00:22:41.260 So as far as

00:22:42.380 I can tell,

00:22:42.940 there's nothing

00:22:43.500 really here

00:22:45.920 except you

00:22:46.560 could make an

00:22:47.080 argument for

00:22:47.620 the infrastructure

00:22:48.280 bill, but I

00:22:49.080 think it would

00:22:49.500 have happened

00:22:49.860 anyway.

00:22:51.600 Now, do the

00:22:52.520 same thing

00:22:52.960 with Trump.

00:22:54.580 Did Trump

00:22:55.340 accomplish

00:22:55.980 anything that

00:22:56.920 you say,

00:22:57.340 well, that was

00:22:57.820 going to happen

00:22:58.280 anyway, no

00:22:59.520 matter who was

00:23:00.100 in charge?

00:23:00.980 So Trump was

00:23:01.980 tough on the

00:23:02.580 border.

00:23:03.540 Was that going

00:23:04.040 to happen

00:23:04.360 anyway?

00:23:05.200 No, no, it

00:23:06.100 wasn't going to

00:23:06.520 happen anyway.

00:23:07.520 That was something

00:23:08.000 he did that

00:23:08.680 nobody else was

00:23:09.280 going to do.

00:23:10.580 How about

00:23:11.340 Trump basically

00:23:13.960 calming down

00:23:15.000 the problems

00:23:15.540 with North

00:23:16.040 Korea? 0.70

00:23:17.820 Was Biden

00:23:18.680 going to do

00:23:19.060 that?

00:23:19.960 No.

00:23:20.540 There was no

00:23:20.920 chance Biden

00:23:21.640 was going to

00:23:22.200 have a personal

00:23:23.260 relationship with

00:23:24.200 Kim Jong-un,

00:23:24.900 which would

00:23:25.280 effectively change

00:23:26.360 the entire

00:23:26.880 security situation.

00:23:29.220 No.

00:23:29.680 And I feel

00:23:30.360 like I could

00:23:30.880 go through

00:23:31.320 example after

00:23:32.220 example of

00:23:33.520 something that

00:23:34.120 Trump accomplished

00:23:35.060 that you

00:23:36.120 couldn't really

00:23:36.680 imagine somebody

00:23:37.440 else doing.

00:23:37.940 that, my

00:23:39.720 friends, is

00:23:41.600 why I

00:23:42.420 supported him.

00:23:44.060 Not because

00:23:45.080 everything he

00:23:45.920 does is better

00:23:46.600 than everything

00:23:47.180 anybody else

00:23:47.880 does.

00:23:48.400 I've never

00:23:48.800 believed that.

00:23:50.560 What I believe

00:23:51.420 is that sometimes

00:23:52.100 you need a

00:23:52.720 disruptor and

00:23:54.560 it's just good

00:23:55.060 for the system.

00:23:55.940 Could have

00:23:56.280 been a

00:23:56.520 Democrat,

00:23:57.680 depending on

00:23:58.340 the type of

00:23:58.820 disruption.

00:23:59.920 But sometimes

00:24:00.500 you need

00:24:00.800 somebody to

00:24:01.160 just go and 1.00

00:24:01.580 break shit. 1.00

00:24:03.120 Just go break 1.00

00:24:04.400 everything and

00:24:05.440 then put it

00:24:06.020 back together.

00:24:07.200 Better.

00:24:08.140 Build it back

00:24:08.620 better.

00:24:10.120 So I got

00:24:11.160 what I wanted

00:24:11.840 out of Trump.

00:24:12.820 Of course,

00:24:13.180 I did not

00:24:13.660 anticipate the

00:24:14.480 degree of

00:24:15.320 animosity that

00:24:16.320 would be

00:24:17.040 generated.

00:24:17.900 I'm not sure

00:24:18.380 anybody did,

00:24:19.900 which is

00:24:20.780 certainly a

00:24:21.340 negative.

00:24:23.460 All right,

00:24:23.920 let's talk about

00:24:24.420 the Rittenhouse

00:24:24.920 prosecution.

00:24:27.020 Is there any

00:24:27.540 update on that

00:24:28.340 since I started?

00:24:29.940 I thought they

00:24:30.680 were done with

00:24:31.140 the closing

00:24:31.680 arguments.

00:24:32.440 Are they not

00:24:32.860 done with them?

00:24:33.320 I saw a

00:24:34.460 headline that

00:24:35.120 says maybe

00:24:35.540 they were

00:24:35.780 continuing with

00:24:36.560 them.

00:24:38.060 Have we

00:24:38.580 gone to

00:24:38.920 jury yet?

00:24:41.440 Can somebody

00:24:42.120 give me an

00:24:42.620 update?

00:24:43.160 Have they

00:24:43.460 gone to

00:24:43.920 the jury

00:24:44.380 yet?

00:24:46.000 Oh, yes,

00:24:46.780 they have

00:24:47.020 gone.

00:24:47.400 Oh, it's

00:24:47.680 with the

00:24:47.980 jury.

00:24:49.040 Okay, let's

00:24:49.960 talk about

00:24:50.320 this.

00:24:51.780 So the

00:24:52.460 Rittenhouse

00:24:53.080 defense, or

00:24:54.080 I'm sorry,

00:24:54.480 the prosecution

00:24:55.280 has put on

00:24:57.320 a good

00:24:57.580 defense.

00:24:58.480 Now, everybody

00:24:58.980 is saying

00:24:59.320 that, so

00:24:59.680 that's not

00:25:00.000 my clever

00:25:00.540 idea, but

00:25:01.660 it's certainly

00:25:02.080 true.

00:25:02.520 If you

00:25:03.380 look at

00:25:03.740 it, it

00:25:04.020 looks like

00:25:04.480 the prosecution

00:25:05.320 argued the

00:25:07.000 defense's case.

00:25:08.880 But here are

00:25:09.360 some of the

00:25:09.680 crazy things

00:25:10.360 they said in

00:25:11.180 closing, that

00:25:13.100 you don't have

00:25:13.580 a right to

00:25:14.000 self-defense if

00:25:14.820 you're the

00:25:15.120 one with

00:25:15.420 the gun.

00:25:17.580 What?

00:25:19.540 That's just

00:25:20.160 not true.

00:25:21.400 You know, as

00:25:21.880 legal scholars

00:25:22.760 and basically

00:25:23.460 anybody with a

00:25:24.160 brain has 0.82

00:25:25.300 told you,

00:25:26.180 now, if the

00:25:26.760 other person

00:25:27.280 is going to 0.85

00:25:27.760 kill you one 1.00

00:25:28.380 way or the 1.00

00:25:28.780 other, yeah, 0.99

00:25:29.960 you can shoot 1.00

00:25:30.580 them. 1.00

00:25:31.780 Shoot away. 1.00

00:25:32.520 And then 1.00

00:25:34.100 one of the

00:25:35.880 prosecutors in

00:25:36.720 the closing

00:25:37.120 statement said,

00:25:38.300 you know,

00:25:38.640 sometimes we

00:25:39.260 all have to

00:25:39.700 take a 0.98

00:25:40.040 beating. 0.98

00:25:41.620 What?

00:25:42.640 Sometimes we

00:25:43.460 all have to

00:25:44.020 take a 0.98

00:25:44.900 beating.

00:25:48.480 Sometimes we

00:25:49.320 have to punch

00:25:49.780 things.

00:25:50.300 That's true.

00:25:52.660 But it

00:25:55.120 may be true

00:25:55.700 that sometimes

00:25:56.360 people get

00:25:57.200 beatings, but

00:25:58.900 you don't have

00:25:59.460 to take one.

00:26:00.040 If I could

00:26:01.560 give you some

00:26:02.120 advice, if

00:26:03.100 you have a

00:26:03.420 gun and

00:26:03.800 somebody's

00:26:04.280 beating you

00:26:04.960 viciously, 1.00

00:26:06.560 shoot them. 1.00

00:26:07.860 That would 1.00

00:26:08.240 be my

00:26:08.580 advice.

00:26:10.340 And then

00:26:10.940 there was

00:26:11.280 the judge

00:26:12.300 instructions.

00:26:13.540 So here,

00:26:14.080 the judge

00:26:14.640 was, here's

00:26:17.120 my take on

00:26:18.920 the judge's

00:26:19.460 instructions.

00:26:20.020 I don't think

00:26:20.780 you're going to

00:26:21.180 see this take

00:26:21.860 anywhere else.

00:26:23.200 So I want

00:26:23.820 to see if I

00:26:24.260 can convince

00:26:24.840 you that my

00:26:25.320 take is right.

00:26:26.000 Are you ready?

00:26:26.280 All right, so

00:26:27.860 I don't think

00:26:28.500 you've seen

00:26:28.860 this, but I

00:26:29.460 haven't heard

00:26:29.840 every pundit,

00:26:30.560 so maybe

00:26:30.880 somebody's on

00:26:31.480 the same

00:26:31.760 point.

00:26:32.760 So the

00:26:33.140 judge was

00:26:33.540 giving the

00:26:34.200 instructions to

00:26:35.500 the jury and

00:26:36.920 started out by

00:26:37.660 saying that if

00:26:38.820 you find the

00:26:39.500 defendant guilty

00:26:40.180 of the top

00:26:41.160 charge, the

00:26:42.200 most aggressive

00:26:43.100 one, then you

00:26:44.440 don't need to

00:26:45.220 continue because

00:26:46.280 the lesser

00:26:46.780 charges are

00:26:47.480 lesser.

00:26:48.560 So if you

00:26:48.940 find the top

00:26:49.520 charge is

00:26:50.120 valid, you're

00:26:51.020 done.

00:26:52.400 Then he said,

00:26:53.820 but if you

00:26:55.860 find that the

00:26:56.460 top charge is

00:26:57.300 not valid, and

00:26:59.600 you find, here's

00:27:00.320 the key, here's

00:27:01.080 the key phrase, and

00:27:02.600 you find that he

00:27:03.340 acted in self

00:27:04.160 defense, then the

00:27:06.160 judge stopped

00:27:06.720 himself, and he

00:27:08.980 couldn't go on.

00:27:10.760 And he realized he

00:27:11.900 talked himself into

00:27:13.080 a trap, which he

00:27:15.320 admitted.

00:27:15.860 He said, I think I

00:27:16.780 talked myself into

00:27:17.560 a trap.

00:27:18.000 He said it

00:27:18.480 differently, but he

00:27:19.700 admitted he talked

00:27:20.460 himself into a

00:27:21.240 trap.

00:27:21.800 What was the

00:27:22.300 trap?

00:27:23.940 What was the

00:27:24.480 trap?

00:27:25.860 What was the

00:27:26.940 judge realizing he

00:27:28.200 had just done?

00:27:34.860 I think what he

00:27:35.900 had just done is

00:27:37.740 basically told

00:27:40.740 them that if it

00:27:41.560 looked like self

00:27:42.240 defense, there was

00:27:42.960 nothing else to

00:27:43.620 think about.

00:27:45.400 Now, he didn't

00:27:46.120 say that, but it

00:27:48.360 was pretty close to

00:27:49.340 sounding like that.

00:27:50.940 If you thought it

00:27:52.260 was self defense,

00:27:53.100 you're sort of

00:27:53.560 done here.

00:27:53.980 Now, I don't

00:27:55.640 think he meant

00:27:56.180 to say that,

00:27:56.860 right?

00:27:58.160 But it's true.

00:28:05.400 It's true.

00:28:07.500 Meaning that if it

00:28:08.940 looked like self

00:28:09.540 defense, there's

00:28:10.180 really not much

00:28:10.860 else to talk about

00:28:11.600 because the gun

00:28:12.160 charge was thrown

00:28:12.880 out, right?

00:28:13.340 So, I feel as

00:28:16.620 if he biased the

00:28:19.660 jury toward an

00:28:21.020 acquittal in a

00:28:21.780 way that he

00:28:22.240 realized he'd

00:28:22.900 done as he was

00:28:23.600 doing it, and

00:28:24.500 then he tried to

00:28:25.080 back it out.

00:28:26.080 Now, here's the

00:28:26.700 problem.

00:28:28.800 There's no evidence

00:28:29.740 of a crime.

00:28:32.320 So, the judge, in

00:28:33.660 giving his

00:28:34.300 instructions, being

00:28:37.020 completely aware that

00:28:39.120 there's no evidence of

00:28:40.060 a crime at all, was

00:28:42.540 simply being honest.

00:28:44.220 And I think he

00:28:44.700 realized he couldn't

00:28:45.400 be completely honest

00:28:46.480 because he just sat

00:28:48.760 through and presided

00:28:49.740 over a thoroughly

00:28:51.260 corrupt process, which

00:28:53.620 I think is going to

00:28:54.320 give us the right

00:28:55.360 answer.

00:28:56.200 But at least the

00:28:56.820 prosecution part of

00:28:57.740 it was thoroughly

00:28:58.300 corrupt.

00:28:59.800 I mean, I don't know

00:29:00.400 how the prosecutors

00:29:01.140 don't go to jail.

00:29:02.900 Honestly, I don't

00:29:03.780 know.

00:29:04.620 I don't understand the

00:29:06.060 process that the

00:29:07.380 prosecutor doesn't go

00:29:08.420 to jail for this.

00:29:09.980 How do you not go

00:29:10.660 to... 1.00

00:29:11.180 Fuck that 1.00

00:29:12.000 prosecutor. 1.00

00:29:12.640 He belongs in

00:29:13.480 jail.

00:29:17.680 Quality of

00:29:18.360 persuasion of the

00:29:19.120 closing arguments.

00:29:21.700 I didn't watch them

00:29:22.920 enough, but what I

00:29:23.980 did watch looked like

00:29:25.240 none of them were

00:29:26.440 good.

00:29:28.240 So, my take on both

00:29:29.640 the defense and the

00:29:30.700 prosecution is that

00:29:32.280 none of them were

00:29:33.180 especially good at

00:29:34.280 their job.

00:29:35.320 Did you have the

00:29:35.880 same impression?

00:29:37.320 In fact, I would

00:29:38.440 go further.

00:29:40.160 It looked like neither

00:29:41.200 the defense nor the

00:29:42.300 prosecution were even

00:29:43.340 trained in persuasion.

00:29:45.280 Did you see anything

00:29:46.400 that looked like they

00:29:47.160 were trained in

00:29:48.060 persuasion?

00:29:49.380 They're trained in

00:29:50.040 the law, and, you

00:29:51.700 know, there's a little

00:29:52.160 persuasion-y stuff in

00:29:53.260 there, but it doesn't

00:29:54.740 look like they know

00:29:55.460 persuasion.

00:29:57.320 They were just

00:29:58.000 terrible at it.

00:29:58.860 I mean, really

00:29:59.440 terrible.

00:30:00.000 In fact, both the

00:30:00.820 defense and the

00:30:01.800 prosecution kept

00:30:03.360 repeating the other

00:30:04.280 one's case.

00:30:05.140 Now, I know you

00:30:06.600 have to do that for

00:30:07.480 context and stuff, but

00:30:08.880 the way they were

00:30:09.540 doing it, it just

00:30:11.440 seemed like it was

00:30:11.980 reinforcing the other

00:30:12.880 side.

00:30:13.940 I felt like it was

00:30:15.080 terrible in both

00:30:16.360 cases.

00:30:17.040 That was my take.

00:30:24.940 Yeah, and they made

00:30:25.940 it too boring.

00:30:26.620 That's right.

00:30:27.000 So, both sides made

00:30:29.460 their presentations

00:30:30.260 too boring, so there

00:30:31.420 won't be any sticky

00:30:32.220 parts.

00:30:32.620 The secret to

00:30:35.160 having a, you

00:30:37.580 know, good

00:30:37.860 persuasion is that

00:30:40.260 the parts, you

00:30:41.680 have to remember

00:30:42.160 that people are

00:30:42.620 only going to

00:30:42.880 remember 10% of

00:30:43.820 what you say.

00:30:45.380 So you've got to

00:30:46.080 make sure that the

00:30:46.760 10% they remember

00:30:47.760 is really, really

00:30:48.700 important.

00:30:50.240 Right?

00:30:50.620 So I don't think

00:30:51.440 that either side did

00:30:52.700 that.

00:30:53.800 I think they treated

00:30:54.580 it all like it was

00:30:55.320 just one big soup of

00:30:56.640 stuff, and you'd be

00:30:59.220 lucky if you remembered

00:31:00.280 anything in it.

00:31:02.620 Yeah, Johnny

00:31:03.240 Cochran would be the 0.85

00:31:04.200 standard for

00:31:05.080 persuasion.

00:31:08.740 I saw a clip of

00:31:10.080 Toobin on CNN saying

00:31:12.380 that the judge's

00:31:13.900 instructions to the

00:31:15.060 jury were all

00:31:16.000 terrible, which sort

00:31:18.120 of sets us up for a

00:31:19.300 riot, doesn't it?

00:31:20.620 Because now we have a

00:31:21.660 reason for thinking it

00:31:23.920 was an illegal trial or

00:31:25.340 illegitimate.

00:31:26.580 And he provided the

00:31:27.520 reason.

00:31:27.720 Well, the jury

00:31:28.460 instructions were so

00:31:29.340 bad that the jury

00:31:30.980 didn't know how to

00:31:31.700 come to a good

00:31:32.480 verdict.

00:31:34.040 It feels like CNN is

00:31:35.940 trying to set us up.

00:31:38.280 Now, again, when I say

00:31:39.560 that, I don't mean that

00:31:40.860 they planned that, like

00:31:42.600 they had a meeting and

00:31:43.480 they said, hey, let's

00:31:44.060 try to create a riot.

00:31:45.240 I don't think that.

00:31:46.820 I think that everybody

00:31:47.640 just follows the money,

00:31:49.680 even if they're

00:31:51.100 convincing themselves

00:31:52.020 they're not.

00:31:52.580 So in a situation like

00:31:55.280 this, the hypnotist

00:31:56.380 would say, all the

00:31:57.940 people are telling the

00:31:58.800 truth when they think

00:32:01.820 they're just talking

00:32:02.520 about the news.

00:32:03.780 And if you put them

00:32:04.440 on a lie detector,

00:32:05.260 you'd say, are you

00:32:05.840 trying to create a

00:32:06.560 riot?

00:32:07.460 They would all say no

00:32:08.620 and they would all

00:32:09.640 pass.

00:32:10.600 The lie detector would

00:32:11.580 find no sign of

00:32:14.100 lying.

00:32:16.600 But, as I often

00:32:18.560 tell you, you can

00:32:20.260 always predict where

00:32:21.200 things are going by

00:32:22.160 following the money.

00:32:24.040 So, is it a

00:32:25.240 coincidence that the

00:32:26.480 CNN people say

00:32:27.400 exactly what will

00:32:28.320 make them the most

00:32:29.060 money?

00:32:30.640 I don't think so.

00:32:32.080 It's not a

00:32:32.780 coincidence.

00:32:33.880 Because it happens

00:32:34.460 always.

00:32:35.720 It's 100% of the

00:32:36.640 time.

00:32:37.240 It never goes the

00:32:38.140 other way.

00:32:39.280 If it sometimes

00:32:40.080 went the other way,

00:32:40.820 you'd say, oh, that

00:32:41.460 could be a coincidence.

00:32:43.080 But if it never goes

00:32:43.960 the other way, it

00:32:45.600 just means that

00:32:46.360 following the money

00:32:47.020 works, even when

00:32:48.320 the people don't

00:32:48.860 know they're doing

00:32:49.340 it.

00:32:52.160 What was

00:32:53.020 Carpe Dunctum's

00:32:54.440 MSNBC?

00:32:55.360 Oh, MSNBC

00:32:56.300 apparently showed

00:32:57.160 the prosecutors'

00:32:59.420 closing statements,

00:33:00.520 but not the

00:33:01.160 defense.

00:33:03.440 Now, again, if you

00:33:05.940 were to put a lie

00:33:06.600 detector on the

00:33:07.660 MSNBC producers,

00:33:09.860 and you said, why

00:33:10.540 did you do that?

00:33:12.320 Do you think they'd

00:33:13.220 say, you know, we

00:33:14.500 just thought we'd

00:33:15.300 like to get us a good

00:33:16.980 riot here.

00:33:17.980 We'll just show the

00:33:18.680 prosecution.

00:33:19.060 No, no, I'll bet

00:33:21.300 nobody had that

00:33:22.100 thought.

00:33:23.260 I'll bet everybody

00:33:24.100 at MSNBC simply

00:33:27.140 thought they were

00:33:27.880 making programming

00:33:28.920 decisions.

00:33:30.720 Probably said to

00:33:31.600 themselves, well, when

00:33:32.520 the defense is speaking,

00:33:33.600 that's our highest

00:33:34.200 rated show, so we

00:33:35.820 don't want to put

00:33:36.920 that off, so we'll

00:33:38.260 wait for a lower

00:33:38.980 rated show.

00:33:39.720 Oh, that's just

00:33:40.380 when the prosecution

00:33:41.700 is talking.

00:33:43.820 I'll bet you they

00:33:45.660 could pass a lie

00:33:46.580 detector test saying

00:33:48.500 that they did it

00:33:49.580 for just regular

00:33:50.460 programming interest

00:33:51.800 and had nothing to

00:33:52.660 do with trying to

00:33:54.060 make anything

00:33:54.500 happen.

00:33:55.860 Now, I see some

00:33:56.740 people disagreeing,

00:33:58.440 some saying that

00:33:59.120 they absolutely know

00:34:00.280 what they're doing.

00:34:02.060 Could be.

00:34:03.580 You know, I'm not

00:34:04.180 going to disagree.

00:34:04.780 Actually, I don't

00:34:05.820 think I'll press that

00:34:07.920 point further, because

00:34:09.800 I certainly don't have

00:34:11.880 absolute certainty

00:34:13.400 that nobody knows

00:34:15.300 what they're doing

00:34:15.840 here.

00:34:16.040 So this might be a

00:34:17.900 case where they

00:34:18.420 know exactly what

00:34:19.180 they're doing.

00:34:19.580 I'll give you that.

00:34:21.180 I'll give you that.

00:34:22.940 It might be a case

00:34:23.880 where they know

00:34:24.660 exactly what they're

00:34:25.460 doing.

00:34:26.340 But I'll only say

00:34:27.960 that that's not

00:34:28.900 necessary.

00:34:30.300 It's not necessary

00:34:31.540 that they know

00:34:32.160 they're doing it,

00:34:32.760 because it's going

00:34:33.160 to happen either

00:34:33.600 way.

00:34:34.520 They're going to

00:34:35.200 follow the money

00:34:36.000 either way.

00:34:39.320 Sometimes they know

00:34:40.200 it, sometimes they

00:34:40.940 don't.

00:34:41.540 If you think they

00:34:42.260 know it in this

00:34:42.740 case, I wouldn't say

00:34:44.340 you're wrong,

00:34:44.880 necessarily.

00:34:46.500 All right.

00:34:47.200 I got this comment

00:34:48.280 from Josh Jordan.

00:34:49.620 He's a blue

00:34:50.560 Czech guy on

00:34:51.420 Twitter.

00:34:53.020 And when I said

00:34:53.860 that CNN was

00:34:54.480 trying to maybe

00:34:55.540 start a riot,

00:34:56.960 he said sarcastically,

00:34:58.320 yes, the tiny CNN

00:34:59.540 audience is going

00:35:00.360 to start riots,

00:35:01.060 because Toobin

00:35:01.680 said the instructions

00:35:02.480 were botched.

00:35:03.980 Sarcasm.

00:35:05.200 Now, here's my

00:35:05.980 first response.

00:35:08.120 It's not the tiny

00:35:09.280 CNN audience that

00:35:10.580 matters.

00:35:11.620 It's their online

00:35:12.580 presence, and the

00:35:13.920 fact that they

00:35:14.440 give all the

00:35:15.460 Democrats their

00:35:16.180 talking points.

00:35:17.480 It matters who

00:35:18.460 watches, and it

00:35:19.580 matters who sees

00:35:20.700 the clips and

00:35:21.300 stuff online.

00:35:22.800 So if you think

00:35:24.260 that CNN's reach

00:35:25.600 is based on their

00:35:27.040 live audience, it's

00:35:29.120 not.

00:35:29.860 It's not based on

00:35:30.880 that at all.

00:35:31.660 In fact, I think

00:35:32.360 they use the live

00:35:33.240 program just to

00:35:34.020 create clips for

00:35:35.720 their online content.

00:35:37.760 It's mostly a

00:35:38.540 website at this

00:35:39.800 point.

00:35:40.540 It's basically a

00:35:41.240 website.

00:35:41.480 Does anybody

00:35:42.300 have any data?

00:35:43.080 Maybe you can

00:35:43.460 find it while I'm

00:35:44.160 on here.

00:35:44.960 Find me the

00:35:45.720 number of viewers

00:35:46.860 for the CNN

00:35:48.520 website, or their

00:35:51.120 content, any way

00:35:52.020 you can find it,

00:35:52.780 versus the number

00:35:53.800 of live viewers.

00:35:55.680 Should be a

00:35:56.500 gigantic difference,

00:35:57.440 right?

00:35:58.840 I think there's a

00:35:59.580 gigantic difference.

00:36:00.400 Anyway, so that's

00:36:01.480 my first complaint.

00:36:02.880 Then Josh Jordan

00:36:04.280 went on.

00:36:04.760 He said, just

00:36:05.320 imagine what

00:36:06.040 could happen if

00:36:07.240 someone with a

00:36:07.900 real audience,

00:36:08.820 like the

00:36:09.640 president of the

00:36:10.180 United States,

00:36:11.300 told everyone a

00:36:12.160 national election

00:36:12.960 was rigged.

00:36:14.460 Oh.

00:36:16.040 So what about

00:36:16.700 that?

00:36:18.000 So Trump did

00:36:19.440 tell the nation

00:36:20.100 that the election

00:36:20.700 was rigged.

00:36:22.500 So I asked this

00:36:23.480 question back to

00:36:24.220 Josh.

00:36:24.520 I said, what was

00:36:25.860 he supposed to

00:36:26.680 say if he

00:36:27.800 believed it was

00:36:28.920 true?

00:36:30.140 And I'll ask you

00:36:30.820 the same question.

00:36:32.140 So many of us,

00:36:33.200 and I would

00:36:33.860 include myself,

00:36:35.600 were not impressed

00:36:37.000 with the way Trump

00:36:37.900 handled the laws.

00:36:38.960 Is that fair to

00:36:40.160 say?

00:36:40.820 You know, you

00:36:41.140 could be a

00:36:41.540 supporter and

00:36:42.560 still say you

00:36:43.120 don't like the

00:36:43.600 way he handled

00:36:44.080 the laws.

00:36:44.980 You might not

00:36:45.500 like what he

00:36:46.100 talked about,

00:36:46.880 you know, the

00:36:47.280 January 6th

00:36:47.980 stuff.

00:36:48.760 You might not

00:36:49.440 like that he

00:36:50.360 complained as

00:36:51.320 much as he did

00:36:52.180 about the

00:36:52.860 election being

00:36:53.760 fraudulent in

00:36:55.420 his opinion.

00:36:57.100 But let me ask

00:36:57.960 you this.

00:36:59.280 What if he

00:36:59.880 believed it was

00:37:00.660 true?

00:37:02.520 Well, let me

00:37:03.300 back up.

00:37:04.460 Do you think he

00:37:05.040 believed it's

00:37:05.580 true?

00:37:05.740 Do you

00:37:07.240 think that

00:37:07.620 Trump honestly

00:37:09.460 believes the

00:37:11.500 election was

00:37:12.040 stolen?

00:37:13.020 I do.

00:37:13.960 I think he

00:37:14.480 honestly believes

00:37:15.260 that.

00:37:16.280 Now, if he

00:37:18.100 honestly believes

00:37:18.980 it, and at

00:37:20.900 the time he was

00:37:21.580 still president of

00:37:22.420 the United States,

00:37:24.180 do you want a

00:37:25.160 president who

00:37:25.700 doesn't tell you

00:37:26.560 that?

00:37:27.660 What is the

00:37:28.380 better situation?

00:37:30.340 Is the better

00:37:31.240 situation that he

00:37:32.420 lies to us?

00:37:33.160 Or that he

00:37:35.220 rolls over?

00:37:37.200 Did the

00:37:37.900 Republicans elect

00:37:40.260 a lion or a

00:37:42.620 kitten?

00:37:43.900 If Republicans

00:37:45.620 had elected a

00:37:46.820 kitten, then yes,

00:37:48.880 they'd be quite

00:37:49.380 happy if he

00:37:49.940 rolled over, even

00:37:51.420 if he thought he

00:37:52.060 shouldn't.

00:37:53.200 That's what

00:37:53.700 kittens do.

00:37:54.380 We elected a 0.84

00:37:55.040 kitten.

00:37:56.020 You don't expect

00:37:56.680 a kitten to put

00:37:57.380 up much of a

00:37:57.960 fight.

00:37:59.240 But Republicans

00:38:01.240 elected a lion.

00:38:02.220 And they got

00:38:03.540 one.

00:38:04.460 They got exactly

00:38:05.280 what they

00:38:05.660 elected.

00:38:06.820 Right?

00:38:07.860 And what's a

00:38:08.400 lion supposed to

00:38:09.260 do?

00:38:11.300 A lion is

00:38:12.260 supposed to be

00:38:12.980 a lion.

00:38:14.480 So, Trump, if

00:38:16.740 I had to guess,

00:38:17.560 we can't read his

00:38:18.240 mind, but I'm

00:38:20.020 sure he thinks,

00:38:21.700 I mean, I think

00:38:22.780 the odds are

00:38:23.380 really high that

00:38:24.780 he thinks he

00:38:25.360 won.

00:38:27.020 Now, my

00:38:28.720 opinion is it

00:38:29.420 probably had more

00:38:30.160 to do with the

00:38:31.060 actual legal stuff

00:38:32.840 behind the scenes

00:38:34.460 before the

00:38:35.060 election, probably

00:38:36.500 less to do with

00:38:37.440 how the election

00:38:38.040 was counted.

00:38:40.040 But, it's still

00:38:42.380 a stolen election.

00:38:43.740 It's just stolen

00:38:44.680 legally.

00:38:45.720 So, you can steal

00:38:46.560 an election

00:38:47.200 legally, and I

00:38:49.140 think that's

00:38:49.540 exactly what

00:38:50.080 happened.

00:38:51.120 But, I will

00:38:52.620 also add this

00:38:53.360 to the thought,

00:38:54.240 that the election

00:38:55.200 system is in a

00:38:56.200 category.

00:38:56.740 It's in a

00:38:57.880 category of

00:38:58.480 big, complex

00:38:59.980 things that

00:39:01.720 are somewhat

00:39:02.840 opaque.

00:39:04.420 In other words,

00:39:05.020 you and I have

00:39:05.620 never seen the

00:39:06.300 code for the

00:39:07.560 electronic parts

00:39:09.340 of the system,

00:39:10.660 right?

00:39:11.280 That's invisible

00:39:12.320 to us, and if

00:39:13.060 you asked for the

00:39:13.620 code, they

00:39:13.980 wouldn't give it

00:39:14.380 to you.

00:39:14.960 So, our

00:39:15.560 election system

00:39:16.260 is not

00:39:16.940 transparent, by

00:39:18.400 design.

00:39:19.120 It's not even

00:39:19.900 intended to be

00:39:20.680 transparent.

00:39:21.120 And, there's

00:39:23.760 big money

00:39:24.220 involved, you

00:39:25.160 know, big

00:39:25.620 stakes.

00:39:27.500 So, in that

00:39:28.060 situation, if it's

00:39:29.260 complicated, and

00:39:30.020 it's big, and

00:39:30.540 there's lots of

00:39:30.960 money, and

00:39:31.480 it's not

00:39:32.880 transparent, fraud

00:39:34.920 will happen

00:39:35.320 every time.

00:39:37.820 Fraud will

00:39:38.460 happen every

00:39:39.040 time.

00:39:39.560 The only thing

00:39:40.140 you don't know

00:39:40.740 is how much,

00:39:42.460 and whether

00:39:43.000 there was enough

00:39:43.700 this time.

00:39:45.000 So, I don't

00:39:45.620 have any, I

00:39:46.420 have no proof

00:39:47.120 that there was

00:39:47.900 fraud that

00:39:48.420 changed the

00:39:48.900 election outcome.

00:39:49.980 And, I see

00:39:51.400 a troll over

00:39:52.520 on YouTube 0.75

00:39:54.920 saying that

00:39:56.240 T-Rump

00:39:57.220 lost, in

00:39:58.900 capital letters,

00:39:59.640 lost.

00:40:00.680 Now, I've

00:40:02.340 said that from

00:40:02.880 the start.

00:40:04.400 I said that

00:40:05.320 the system,

00:40:06.600 which we

00:40:07.740 respect, even

00:40:08.860 with its flaws,

00:40:09.720 we respect the

00:40:10.440 system, the

00:40:11.180 system elected

00:40:13.020 Biden.

00:40:14.000 I accepted

00:40:14.600 it on day

00:40:15.140 one, which

00:40:16.000 is different

00:40:16.440 from whether

00:40:17.000 it should

00:40:17.420 have, or

00:40:18.040 whether it

00:40:18.400 was fair,

00:40:19.060 or anything.

00:40:19.280 But, the

00:40:20.060 system, unfortunately

00:40:21.580 we have to

00:40:22.200 support the

00:40:22.680 system over

00:40:23.320 the result,

00:40:24.580 if you want

00:40:25.820 the republic

00:40:26.980 to stay

00:40:27.460 together.

00:40:28.720 Sometimes the

00:40:29.640 system is going

00:40:30.240 to give us

00:40:30.660 the wrong

00:40:30.980 result.

00:40:31.800 Actually, lots

00:40:32.420 of times.

00:40:33.400 But, if you

00:40:34.220 tear down the

00:40:34.760 system, you

00:40:35.280 have more

00:40:35.600 trouble than

00:40:36.180 if you argue

00:40:38.020 with the

00:40:38.360 result.

00:40:40.720 So, in

00:40:42.600 my opinion, it

00:40:43.340 is unknowable,

00:40:44.420 but, and

00:40:45.000 then, of

00:40:45.280 course, Josh

00:40:45.860 came back with

00:40:46.660 the courts,

00:40:47.380 didn't find

00:40:47.880 anything, and

00:40:49.100 then I

00:40:49.420 responded with,

00:40:50.880 the courts

00:40:51.400 are not

00:40:51.760 designed to

00:40:52.340 find fraud

00:40:52.920 in elections.

00:40:54.200 And, in

00:40:54.560 fact, they

00:40:54.900 mostly ruled

00:40:55.580 that they

00:40:55.880 didn't have

00:40:56.220 standing, or

00:40:57.460 that it was

00:40:57.820 too late to

00:40:58.460 ask.

00:40:59.540 So, courts

00:41:00.200 didn't make

00:41:00.940 any rulings

00:41:01.500 about fraud

00:41:02.400 in the

00:41:02.660 election.

00:41:05.940 Politics

00:41:06.340 Insider, which

00:41:07.100 I guess is

00:41:07.500 part of

00:41:07.780 Business

00:41:08.080 Insider, is

00:41:09.940 saying that

00:41:10.320 Buttigieg is

00:41:11.020 the most

00:41:11.340 powerful

00:41:11.720 transportation

00:41:12.400 secretary,

00:41:12.960 because he's

00:41:13.460 got this

00:41:13.860 one-point

00:41:14.920 trillion

00:41:15.320 infrastructure

00:41:15.920 bill that

00:41:16.620 he can

00:41:16.940 dole out.

00:41:18.440 To which

00:41:18.980 I say,

00:41:19.820 did I

00:41:20.180 imagine that

00:41:23.140 Biden

00:41:23.520 appointed a

00:41:25.040 infrastructure

00:41:25.740 czar?

00:41:27.020 Did I just

00:41:27.800 imagine that?

00:41:29.140 And is the

00:41:29.720 infrastructure

00:41:30.380 czar not

00:41:31.460 the one who

00:41:32.100 would make

00:41:32.440 all these

00:41:32.820 decisions that

00:41:33.600 were just

00:41:34.040 attributed to

00:41:35.260 Buttigieg? 0.60

00:41:36.340 What am I

00:41:37.060 missing?

00:41:38.940 I'm just

00:41:39.620 confused by

00:41:40.280 the story.

00:41:40.740 Did I

00:41:43.400 miss a

00:41:43.900 story that

00:41:44.660 somebody else

00:41:45.740 was put in

00:41:46.300 charge of

00:41:46.700 this?

00:41:48.500 And who

00:41:49.120 does that

00:41:49.480 person report

00:41:50.040 to?

00:41:50.240 Maybe they

00:41:50.580 report to

00:41:51.060 Buttigieg.

00:41:52.360 But it's

00:41:53.020 still going to

00:41:53.340 be somebody

00:41:53.800 else doing

00:41:54.580 the hard

00:41:54.900 work,

00:41:55.300 right?

00:41:58.400 Thank you,

00:41:59.100 Goose.

00:42:01.220 Anyway, I'm

00:42:02.040 just confused

00:42:02.580 of that,

00:42:03.040 because it's

00:42:03.400 two stories

00:42:04.560 that are

00:42:04.840 opposites,

00:42:05.500 and they're

00:42:05.680 both in

00:42:06.000 the news

00:42:06.280 at the

00:42:06.520 same time.

00:42:09.120 Have I

00:42:09.680 told you

00:42:10.020 before that

00:42:10.660 you should

00:42:11.000 not reject

00:42:11.600 your

00:42:11.800 opponent's

00:42:12.220 arguments,

00:42:12.740 because that

00:42:13.200 never works.

00:42:14.760 You should

00:42:15.120 get inside

00:42:15.680 them.

00:42:17.620 So here's

00:42:18.180 a persuasion

00:42:18.780 tip again,

00:42:19.500 and I'll

00:42:19.660 give you

00:42:19.860 another

00:42:20.100 example of

00:42:20.820 it.

00:42:21.380 You should

00:42:21.760 get inside

00:42:22.440 your

00:42:23.520 opponent's

00:42:24.940 persuasion.

00:42:25.820 Don't say

00:42:26.160 it's all

00:42:26.400 wrong.

00:42:27.980 Wear it

00:42:28.600 like a

00:42:29.020 suit,

00:42:29.860 and then

00:42:30.440 change it

00:42:31.960 from the

00:42:32.220 inside.

00:42:33.340 Now, when

00:42:33.760 Trump was

00:42:34.300 first running

00:42:34.860 for president,

00:42:37.020 he was

00:42:38.420 accused of

00:42:39.000 not being

00:42:39.420 a Republican

00:42:40.000 enough,

00:42:41.140 right?

00:42:41.760 But instead

00:42:42.380 of just

00:42:43.100 being

00:42:43.380 anti-Republican,

00:42:44.740 which wouldn't

00:42:45.240 have worked,

00:42:46.240 he became

00:42:47.220 more Republican

00:42:47.980 than the

00:42:48.460 Republicans.

00:42:49.120 He basically

00:42:49.600 got inside

00:42:50.400 their argument.

00:42:52.460 Does that

00:42:52.740 make sense?

00:42:53.840 Instead of

00:42:54.480 saying,

00:42:54.880 no, I am

00:42:55.480 one, he'd be

00:42:56.520 outside the

00:42:57.020 argument arguing

00:42:57.740 with people.

00:42:58.560 No, I am

00:42:59.100 Republican.

00:42:59.780 I'm Republican

00:43:00.400 enough.

00:43:01.380 He became

00:43:01.980 more Republican

00:43:02.720 than the

00:43:03.200 Republicans.

00:43:05.140 Right?

00:43:06.220 So as soon as

00:43:07.040 he became more

00:43:07.720 Republican than

00:43:08.460 Republicans, it

00:43:09.140 was hard to

00:43:09.520 say anything

00:43:09.900 about him.

00:43:10.840 Because he

00:43:11.360 was more

00:43:11.700 Republican than

00:43:12.400 they were.

00:43:13.320 He was

00:43:13.860 harder on the

00:43:14.380 border than

00:43:14.860 they were.

00:43:15.860 You know, all

00:43:16.520 that stuff.

00:43:18.100 Harder on, you

00:43:18.980 know, police,

00:43:20.360 wanting police,

00:43:21.540 et cetera.

00:43:22.860 So that's one

00:43:23.700 example of it.

00:43:24.880 Let me give you

00:43:25.800 another one, and

00:43:26.860 I'll use it about

00:43:28.640 critical race

00:43:29.480 theory.

00:43:30.600 Suppose you

00:43:31.280 don't like

00:43:31.680 critical race

00:43:32.300 theory in

00:43:32.820 school, and

00:43:33.340 you're arguing,

00:43:34.300 get that out of 0.99

00:43:35.020 my school.

00:43:36.380 What's the

00:43:36.780 other side say?

00:43:38.440 There's no

00:43:39.080 critical race

00:43:39.940 theory in

00:43:40.600 school.

00:43:41.620 What are you

00:43:41.960 talking about?

00:43:43.060 And you say,

00:43:43.520 yes, there is,

00:43:44.280 yes, there is,

00:43:44.900 get it out of

00:43:45.400 there.

00:43:46.120 And then the

00:43:46.600 other side says,

00:43:47.880 no, no, there

00:43:48.580 isn't. 0.96

00:43:49.160 You white 1.00

00:43:49.760 supremacist, no, 0.99

00:43:51.200 there's nothing

00:43:51.540 here.

00:43:52.660 So you notice

00:43:53.400 how being

00:43:54.200 outside the

00:43:54.960 argument gets

00:43:55.660 you no

00:43:56.000 traction, right?

00:43:57.360 Now here's the

00:43:58.020 alternative.

00:43:59.500 Get inside the

00:44:00.300 argument.

00:44:01.680 Critical race

00:44:02.380 theory, totally,

00:44:04.980 totally,

00:44:05.680 uh,

00:44:06.460 totally is not

00:44:08.420 happening.

00:44:10.840 But, do you

00:44:12.520 know what is

00:44:12.900 happening?

00:44:14.020 Because the

00:44:14.700 schools are not

00:44:15.420 teaching critical

00:44:16.160 race theory.

00:44:17.240 So I'm going to

00:44:18.500 model my argument

00:44:19.340 here.

00:44:20.140 I agree with you,

00:44:21.920 Democrats, when you

00:44:23.180 say that there's no

00:44:24.280 critical race theory

00:44:25.280 being taught in

00:44:26.340 school, you are

00:44:27.040 100% correct.

00:44:29.400 Now watch what I'm

00:44:30.280 doing.

00:44:30.920 Before you react,

00:44:32.420 watch what I'm

00:44:32.920 doing.

00:44:33.160 I'm entering the

00:44:34.720 argument.

00:44:35.900 I'm not debating

00:44:36.900 it, I'm entering

00:44:37.840 it.

00:44:38.820 Yeah.

00:44:39.940 Critical race

00:44:40.660 theory, no way

00:44:41.420 that's being taught

00:44:42.000 in schools.

00:44:42.920 There are no

00:44:43.600 examples of it.

00:44:44.720 You can't give me

00:44:45.400 one example of

00:44:46.320 critical race theory

00:44:47.360 being taught in

00:44:48.600 schools, because

00:44:49.180 critical race theory

00:44:50.080 is above school

00:44:51.880 level.

00:44:52.220 It's sort of a

00:44:52.700 college level

00:44:53.440 concept, and it

00:44:55.240 is not in, in

00:44:56.660 schools.

00:44:56.980 But you know

00:44:58.600 what is?

00:45:00.120 Do you know what

00:45:00.820 is in schools?

00:45:03.260 Systemic critical

00:45:04.460 race theory.

00:45:05.480 There isn't any

00:45:06.240 direct critical race

00:45:07.340 theory, I totally

00:45:08.160 agree.

00:45:09.220 I'm with you,

00:45:10.020 Democrats.

00:45:10.840 There's no critical

00:45:11.580 race theory, but

00:45:12.500 there is systemic,

00:45:13.940 meaning that if you

00:45:14.960 were to look at how

00:45:15.840 the lessons are being

00:45:16.780 taught, you can see

00:45:17.640 it's embedded in the

00:45:18.520 lessons, without the

00:45:20.140 name.

00:45:22.160 So I started the

00:45:23.880 hashtag, it turns

00:45:25.580 out somebody on the

00:45:26.720 other side was using

00:45:28.180 it already, but

00:45:28.880 that's funny.

00:45:30.140 Systemic CRT.

00:45:32.540 Now, likewise, when

00:45:33.780 the Democrats say,

00:45:37.140 hey, there's lots of

00:45:37.860 systemic racism in the

00:45:39.160 world, do you say,

00:45:40.860 no, there isn't?

00:45:41.500 We're not a racist

00:45:42.180 country?

00:45:43.040 Because if you do,

00:45:44.160 you're losing the

00:45:44.940 argument.

00:45:46.320 That's a terrible

00:45:47.280 argument.

00:45:48.380 The worst argument is,

00:45:50.020 no, there isn't.

00:45:51.660 No, there isn't.

00:45:52.480 There's no critical

00:45:53.100 race theory.

00:45:54.200 Terrible argument.

00:45:55.680 You'll never get an

00:45:56.880 inch with that

00:45:57.600 argument.

00:45:57.920 Instead, get inside

00:46:01.320 it.

00:46:02.440 Get inside it.

00:46:03.960 If you get inside it,

00:46:05.160 you say, yeah, there's

00:46:06.040 systemic racism, it's the 0.77

00:46:07.480 biggest frickin' problem 0.96

00:46:08.380 in the country.

00:46:09.920 And that's honest, because

00:46:11.720 I think that.

00:46:12.660 I think systemic racism is

00:46:14.200 the biggest problem in the

00:46:15.680 country, as it is

00:46:18.200 expressed by the

00:46:19.300 teachers' unions.

00:46:21.000 See what I did there?

00:46:22.900 First, you get inside the

00:46:24.160 argument by agreeing with

00:46:25.260 it totally.

00:46:25.640 You could call it

00:46:26.640 pacing, but I'm going

00:46:27.500 further.

00:46:28.400 It's not just pacing.

00:46:30.320 You have to get inside

00:46:31.340 the argument.

00:46:32.320 You have to wear it like

00:46:33.540 clothes.

00:46:34.700 And then you can do

00:46:35.420 something with it.

00:46:36.620 Like, you have to put it

00:46:37.380 on like a jacket, and

00:46:39.200 then you can move the

00:46:39.880 arms and stuff, right?

00:46:40.980 But until you put the

00:46:41.900 jacket on, you've got

00:46:43.240 nothing.

00:46:44.340 You're shooting blanks.

00:46:46.340 You know, you're just

00:46:46.780 like spitting into the

00:46:47.700 ocean, doing nothing.

00:46:49.460 But as soon as you say,

00:46:50.840 yeah, can I help you get

00:46:52.000 rid of this systemic

00:46:52.760 racism?

00:46:53.220 And if you will agree,

00:46:54.560 we'll work on the

00:46:55.180 biggest problems first.

00:46:57.200 Who says no to that?

00:46:59.140 Who says no to working on

00:47:01.000 the biggest problem first?

00:47:03.980 Nobody.

00:47:05.280 So now you're inside the

00:47:06.560 argument.

00:47:07.400 You're agreeing that

00:47:08.100 systemic racism exists.

00:47:10.080 And you're going to say,

00:47:10.820 are you happy with how

00:47:12.140 black kids and other 0.90

00:47:13.840 people of color are being 1.00

00:47:15.020 taught?

00:47:16.580 Nobody says yes.

00:47:18.180 Nobody.

00:47:18.520 Nobody will say, yeah,

00:47:20.200 it's doing pretty good. 0.93

00:47:22.000 Those black students are

00:47:23.380 getting just as good

00:47:24.120 education as everybody

00:47:25.100 else.

00:47:25.660 Nope.

00:47:26.620 Nope.

00:47:26.980 Nobody's going to say

00:47:27.680 that.

00:47:28.620 So now you're totally

00:47:29.520 inside the argument.

00:47:30.620 You've identified the

00:47:31.600 biggest form of systemic

00:47:32.980 racism.

00:47:33.940 You've got them to agree.

00:47:36.560 Now what can we do

00:47:37.540 about it?

00:47:38.540 It's the teachers'

00:47:39.260 unions, because they're

00:47:40.100 the ones preventing

00:47:40.960 competition in schools.

00:47:44.200 And without competition,

00:47:45.320 nothing works.

00:47:46.360 Nothing works without

00:47:47.220 competition.

00:47:48.420 No exceptions.

00:47:50.980 All right.

00:47:51.480 So that's how you get

00:47:53.160 inside an argument.

00:47:56.640 Here's a provocative, 0.98

00:48:00.020 sexist, disgusting 0.98

00:48:01.840 opinion that might 0.99

00:48:04.300 nonetheless be accurate.

00:48:08.040 Here's where I might

00:48:09.200 get canceled.

00:48:11.060 I might.

00:48:12.480 Let's see.

00:48:12.980 So this is a tweet by a

00:48:17.340 Twitter user named

00:48:18.240 Stephan.

00:48:19.540 Nobody I know.

00:48:21.700 And on this topic, he

00:48:23.060 said, teachers' unions

00:48:24.300 are predominantly

00:48:26.100 female.

00:48:27.520 The problem here is 0.75

00:48:28.580 female do-good-rism, 1.00

00:48:30.580 which is properly

00:48:31.440 channeled through

00:48:32.180 religion and charity,

00:48:33.940 but in this case is

00:48:34.820 being transformed into

00:48:36.020 a political offensive.

00:48:38.260 He said it, not me.

00:48:39.680 Now, somebody else

00:48:41.600 pointed out that this

00:48:42.920 was Hitler's technique 0.96

00:48:44.020 as well, that the

00:48:45.900 Hitler youth was more 1.00

00:48:48.500 about the girls.

00:48:50.020 Have you ever heard

00:48:50.620 that?

00:48:51.180 I've never heard that

00:48:51.880 before, so I can't do

00:48:53.440 a fact check on it.

00:48:55.020 But the idea was that

00:48:56.680 when you convinced the

00:48:57.880 boys to be like a 1.00

00:48:59.040 Hitler youth, that 1.00

00:49:00.340 worked.

00:49:03.440 But convincing the

00:49:04.880 girls was more 0.99

00:49:06.080 important because they

00:49:06.940 would be raising the

00:49:07.680 kids.

00:49:09.420 Convincing the girls was

00:49:10.860 the important point

00:49:11.820 because that gets you

00:49:12.940 forever because they're

00:49:14.520 the ones raising the

00:49:15.320 kids, right?

00:49:17.840 And when we see that

00:49:19.260 women predominate or 1.00

00:49:21.620 are dominating the

00:49:23.340 teachers' unions, and

00:49:24.900 we see that the

00:49:25.500 teachers' unions are

00:49:26.480 used to perpetuate

00:49:29.540 systemic racism and 0.98

00:49:32.040 keep black people down, 1.00

00:49:33.520 especially, it looks like 1.00

00:49:37.040 a woman problem, 1.00

00:49:37.840 doesn't it?

00:49:42.460 Now, let me stop here

00:49:45.800 and say, I'm not

00:49:47.980 buying into the

00:49:48.680 argument totally.

00:49:50.280 So I'm not buying into

00:49:51.400 this argument.

00:49:52.300 I'm telling you what the

00:49:53.200 argument is because I

00:49:54.020 think it's provocative

00:49:56.240 enough that it's worthy

00:49:57.860 to be in the mix.

00:49:59.700 But every time you say

00:50:00.880 it's all about women or 1.00

00:50:02.260 all about men, you're

00:50:03.440 automatically into biased,

00:50:05.620 you know, bigoted

00:50:06.480 territory, right?

00:50:07.780 So I don't want to be in

00:50:08.980 bigoted territory by

00:50:10.260 saying it's a woman

00:50:11.180 problem.

00:50:12.080 But it is true that

00:50:13.260 women mostly are 1.00

00:50:14.300 responsible for raising

00:50:15.280 kids.

00:50:16.540 That's still true.

00:50:17.920 It doesn't need to be,

00:50:19.200 and blah, blah, blah,

00:50:19.980 plenty of men are doing

00:50:20.900 that job, and plenty of 0.93

00:50:22.140 gays are doing it, blah, 1.00

00:50:23.500 blah, blah. 0.55

00:50:23.840 But it's still true in 0.81

00:50:24.980 general, mostly female

00:50:26.520 raising the kids.

00:50:29.100 All right, let's talk

00:50:30.160 about Bannon.

00:50:30.700 So Bannon refused to

00:50:33.120 talk to Congress.

00:50:34.940 They find him in

00:50:35.700 contempt, and he turned

00:50:37.560 himself in.

00:50:39.540 And then he said he

00:50:42.120 vowed to topple the

00:50:43.840 Biden regime, as he 0.99

00:50:45.040 calls it, and to make

00:50:47.420 the charges against him

00:50:48.620 a, quote, misdemeanor

00:50:49.880 from hell for the

00:50:52.660 Democrats.

00:50:53.760 Now, he believes that

00:50:54.720 Biden ordered Merrick

00:50:56.100 to go after Bannon.

00:51:02.060 So he says it's

00:51:02.860 basically a political

00:51:04.060 witch hunt.

00:51:06.320 Now, here's the fun

00:51:08.580 part.

00:51:10.320 Here's the fun part.

00:51:12.920 When the Democrats go

00:51:14.320 after the founder of

00:51:18.080 Barstool Sports, they

00:51:22.380 can take a pretty big

00:51:24.740 bite on him, although

00:51:25.600 he's doing a great job

00:51:26.540 of fighting back.

00:51:27.660 So I don't think he's

00:51:28.440 going to get canceled.

00:51:29.840 But he's mostly in a

00:51:31.980 defensive stance,

00:51:33.320 wouldn't you say?

00:51:34.580 I mean, he's going

00:51:35.140 offense against specific

00:51:36.580 media groups that went

00:51:37.940 against him, but mostly

00:51:39.700 he's just trying to

00:51:40.360 survive.

00:51:43.500 Alex Jones is, I guess

00:51:45.080 he lost a lawsuit that

00:51:47.940 could be really bad for

00:51:49.060 Alex Jones, and he

00:51:50.500 might, it might be that

00:51:51.620 the left has taken Alex

00:51:53.300 Jones off the field.

00:51:54.260 I don't know that

00:51:55.760 that's true, but this

00:51:56.800 lawsuit that he lost

00:51:57.920 looks pretty, pretty

00:51:58.920 bad.

00:52:00.120 It might, it might just

00:52:02.220 take him off the field,

00:52:03.220 but I don't know.

00:52:05.600 But do you know what

00:52:07.320 Bannon isn't?

00:52:09.600 He isn't one of those

00:52:10.660 people.

00:52:13.780 Bannon has, let's say,

00:52:19.040 let's say Bannon's game

00:52:20.700 is at a different level.

00:52:24.200 And I think that it's

00:52:27.280 possibly a gigantic

00:52:29.260 mistake to give him

00:52:31.240 this much attention.

00:52:33.260 You know what I mean?

00:52:34.800 Because his power is

00:52:36.100 going up, it's not

00:52:36.880 going down.

00:52:38.200 If they put Bannon in

00:52:39.660 jail for this, he will

00:52:42.820 be the leader of the

00:52:43.860 Democrats, he'll be the 0.97

00:52:44.980 leader of the Republicans.

00:52:45.960 And he's not even

00:52:48.140 asking to be, right?

00:52:49.520 He's not even trying.

00:52:51.260 That's sort of not his

00:52:52.500 deal.

00:52:53.160 He wants to be

00:52:53.720 influential, but he

00:52:54.560 doesn't need to be like

00:52:55.540 the top guy.

00:52:56.460 But you put him in jail

00:52:57.620 and he turns into

00:52:58.320 Nelson Mandela.

00:53:00.940 Do you know who

00:53:01.740 knows that?

00:53:03.400 Bannon.

00:53:04.760 Bannon knows that.

00:53:06.220 Now you can't do that,

00:53:07.160 right?

00:53:07.400 He's an energy monster.

00:53:08.460 That is correct.

00:53:09.900 He learned that from

00:53:10.940 Trump if he didn't

00:53:11.740 already know it.

00:53:12.420 But he is anti-fragile.

00:53:16.840 Now there aren't too

00:53:17.600 many people like that.

00:53:19.460 But if they don't take

00:53:21.740 Bannon out, he's going

00:53:23.160 to take them out.

00:53:25.100 So unlike going after

00:53:27.880 some lesser pundits, if

00:53:31.640 you take a run at Alex

00:53:32.700 Jones and you don't take

00:53:33.740 him out, well, it was

00:53:36.100 worth a shot, right?

00:53:38.060 You didn't take him out,

00:53:39.360 but it was worth a shot.

00:53:40.300 There's no real downside

00:53:41.200 to that.

00:53:41.640 Because he's going to

00:53:42.520 say bad things about

00:53:43.400 Democrats no matter 0.64

00:53:44.200 what, right?

00:53:45.460 But if you don't take

00:53:46.620 Bannon out, you're just

00:53:49.680 making him stronger.

00:53:51.740 And I don't think

00:53:52.700 anybody has quite a good

00:53:54.540 sense of how strong

00:53:55.900 Bannon's game is at

00:53:57.680 this level.

00:53:59.540 You're going to be

00:54:00.360 surprised, is what I

00:54:01.620 think.

00:54:02.460 So Bannon has the

00:54:03.360 surprises.

00:54:05.280 All right.

00:54:06.340 Biden had a Zoom

00:54:08.400 call or something like

00:54:09.680 China's head, Xi, and I

00:54:19.340 don't think he went

00:54:19.980 strong at him.

00:54:20.900 Let's just say that.

00:54:23.200 But it turns out that

00:54:24.400 China has now surpassed 0.96

00:54:26.320 the United States in

00:54:27.180 wealth.

00:54:28.320 China is the wealthiest

00:54:29.920 country now.

00:54:31.560 Now, how do you win a

00:54:33.060 war in 2021?

00:54:34.340 Is it with bombs?

00:54:37.380 Well, if a big power is

00:54:39.000 fighting a tiny power, yes.

00:54:41.260 But what if a superpower is

00:54:43.060 an adversary to another

00:54:44.960 superpower?

00:54:45.840 What is the weapon of

00:54:47.320 choice?

00:54:49.060 It's money.

00:54:50.820 It's money.

00:54:51.900 Whoever has the most money

00:54:53.020 is going to dominate.

00:54:54.600 That's China now. 0.99

00:54:55.500 So as long as China has 0.99

00:54:57.480 the most money, they are

00:54:58.880 the most powerful influence

00:55:00.140 in the world.

00:55:01.140 Because that money can

00:55:02.080 bribe stuff, it can create

00:55:03.600 industries, it can destroy

00:55:04.840 industries, it can do

00:55:06.540 anything.

00:55:07.500 Money is power.

00:55:09.380 So as long as China is 1.00

00:55:11.140 richer, Biden is their 1.00

00:55:13.020 bitch. 1.00

00:55:13.960 And certainly acted that 1.00

00:55:15.280 way.

00:55:17.340 He told Xi, Biden did,

00:55:20.640 that he has concerns over

00:55:22.400 human rights abuses.

00:55:25.500 Uh, really?

00:55:28.000 He has concerns?

00:55:30.140 Wow.

00:55:31.540 I'll bet President Xi was

00:55:33.580 shaken.

00:55:35.160 Oh, no, I didn't know you

00:55:36.260 had concerns about my

00:55:38.400 ethnic cleansing.

00:55:41.380 Do you know what?

00:55:43.220 Concerns about human rights

00:55:44.720 abuses.

00:55:45.780 Somebody needs to tell Xi

00:55:47.420 to his face, we believe

00:55:49.560 you're involved in ethnic

00:55:50.880 cleansing of the Uyghurs 1.00

00:55:52.380 and the fact that you don't

00:55:54.440 let international people

00:55:56.000 come and take a look, we

00:55:57.480 consider proof.

00:56:01.020 Nobody can say that to Xi,

00:56:02.400 can they?

00:56:03.900 Do you know that if Hitler 0.95

00:56:05.280 had been in control of more

00:56:07.840 of the supply chain, he would

00:56:09.180 have gotten away with the

00:56:10.500 Holocaust? 0.83

00:56:14.060 Sorry.

00:56:15.080 It's true.

00:56:15.720 If Germany had the same 0.99

00:56:18.400 control of the supply chain

00:56:21.380 as China does right now,

00:56:23.340 they could have done the

00:56:25.020 Holocaust and just gone on. 0.99

00:56:29.220 You know that's fucking true. 1.00

00:56:31.440 You do. 0.99

00:56:32.660 That's what China's doing. 1.00

00:56:34.220 They're doing their little

00:56:35.300 Holocaust, and they're just 1.00

00:56:37.940 going ahead.

00:56:40.760 Nobody cares.

00:56:42.340 Do you know that saying,

00:56:43.220 never again?

00:56:45.780 Well, perhaps, you know,

00:56:47.480 as people use it, they're

00:56:49.480 referring to the Jewish

00:56:51.200 situation specifically,

00:56:53.240 never again.

00:56:54.580 But clearly it's going to

00:56:56.200 happen again, because it's

00:56:57.200 happening now, and we're

00:56:59.260 letting it happen, and we're

00:57:00.720 okay with it.

00:57:02.280 So that's your government

00:57:04.280 right there.

00:57:05.260 Now, I don't know that Trump

00:57:06.160 would have handled it

00:57:06.860 differently.

00:57:09.000 I'd like to think he would,

00:57:10.280 but I don't know that.

00:57:13.560 And of course, then there

00:57:14.640 was the Taiwan question, and

00:57:16.480 Xi warned against, I guess,

00:57:20.120 Biden warned China against

00:57:22.500 doing anything unilaterally,

00:57:24.260 or blah, blah, blah.

00:57:25.220 No, he warned, no, I guess

00:57:26.540 Xi warned Biden against doing

00:57:28.580 anything unilaterally about

00:57:30.360 the status of Taiwan.

00:57:32.240 A Danish newspaper reported

00:57:34.140 that Biden assured China that

00:57:36.200 U.S. recognizes Taiwan to be a

00:57:37.940 part of China.

00:57:40.640 A Danish newspaper reported

00:57:44.000 this as fact, that Biden

00:57:47.140 said, yeah, China, we

00:57:48.660 recognize Taiwan as part of

00:57:49.920 China.

00:57:50.840 Now, I didn't believe that

00:57:52.120 until I asked somebody on

00:57:54.020 Twitter to send me the

00:57:54.940 headline.

00:57:56.220 Sure enough, I mean, he had

00:57:57.680 translate on Google, and

00:57:59.000 there it is.

00:58:00.400 Yep.

00:58:01.300 The Danes believe that Biden

00:58:04.820 just gave Taiwan to China.

00:58:06.720 I mean, obviously, I'm

00:58:08.360 framing it wrong, but you

00:58:10.100 know what I mean.

00:58:11.620 I'd like a word with the

00:58:12.760 interpreters, because I

00:58:14.680 wonder if there was an

00:58:15.740 interpretation problem.

00:58:18.440 You wonder how they could get

00:58:19.780 to that level of fake news.

00:58:21.000 All right, Rasmussen has a new

00:58:27.420 poll.

00:58:27.940 Did I tell you there was going

00:58:28.840 to be something shocking

00:58:29.920 coming out today?

00:58:31.700 Here's something shocking.

00:58:35.240 In a poll, people were asked if

00:58:39.520 they would favor the GOP or the

00:58:41.560 Democrat candidate for the House

00:58:44.100 and the Senate in the midterm

00:58:45.240 elections.

00:58:45.720 And the GOP is favored by 13

00:58:50.580 points.

00:58:52.600 13 point difference in what

00:58:55.860 voters say they would vote for

00:58:57.760 in 2022.

00:59:01.160 13 points.

00:59:03.080 And that doesn't count the

00:59:04.480 retirements, because there could

00:59:06.260 be a lot of Democrat retirements,

00:59:07.800 apparently, that have been

00:59:08.840 announced or assumed.

00:59:10.860 2022 is just going to be a

00:59:16.240 tsunami, it looks like.

00:59:18.220 Now, I mean, you could say, you

00:59:20.520 know, you can't trust polls and

00:59:21.900 there's plenty of time to go, and

00:59:23.160 that's all true.

00:59:25.380 But then I also saw that in the

00:59:27.060 same poll, that 30 percent of

00:59:28.520 black citizens would vote

00:59:31.280 Republican.

00:59:33.140 30 percent.

00:59:34.540 Does that seem high to you?

00:59:36.440 Apparently, it's been as high as

00:59:37.620 40 percent in the past.

00:59:38.720 But 30 percent seems high,

00:59:41.120 doesn't it?

00:59:45.220 Yeah.

00:59:47.620 So, there's that.

00:59:49.400 All right.

00:59:51.340 I told you that quantum

00:59:52.840 computing might be a problem

00:59:54.020 because it can break

00:59:54.780 encryption, but the smart people

00:59:56.780 in that world told me that we

00:59:59.880 now have encryption that can't be

01:00:02.180 broken by the quantum

01:00:04.020 computers.

01:00:04.600 And even the quantum we have

01:00:07.340 now, it's 100 qubits, it'd have

01:00:09.080 to be 2,000 qubits to break our

01:00:10.780 current stuff, and that's not

01:00:14.020 going to happen right away.

01:00:15.020 So, basically, there's a, you

01:00:17.040 know, there's a continuous war of

01:00:18.580 the encryptors versus the, you

01:00:20.780 know, the people who can break

01:00:21.760 encryption.

01:00:22.500 And so far, the encryptors are

01:00:24.120 ahead.

01:00:25.080 So, we don't have to worry that

01:00:26.640 much about quantum computing

01:00:28.100 breaking encryption.

01:00:29.980 That is my show for the day.

01:00:31.860 I've got to go do other

01:00:32.840 things.

01:00:34.300 I hope you enjoyed this, the,

01:00:35.880 hope you enjoyed the swearing.

01:00:43.300 Overconfidence can be fatal.

01:00:45.020 True.

01:00:47.040 Oh, actually, 50 million qubits,

01:00:49.360 you say.

01:00:50.120 I guess it depends which

01:00:51.020 encryption you're going to try

01:00:52.100 to break.

01:00:52.860 That's all for now.

01:00:53.820 Talk to you later.

01:00:54.380 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 16, 2021

Episode 1563 Scott Adams： I Will Tell You Which Public Figures Are Lying to You Today. Spoiler： Most of Them

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript