Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1569 Scott Adams： How We Confuse Politics With Mental Health Problems. They Are Actually Different

00:00:00.000 Ta-ta-ta-ta-ta. Good morning, everybody, and how lucky we all are. Wow. Woke up alive again.

00:00:09.280 How many days in a row have you nailed it? Yeah. A lot of people are waking up dead,

00:00:13.660 but not you. You're waking up alive, and I respect that. And if you think today could

00:00:20.200 get any better, and you're thinking to yourself, I don't think it could. It's already pretty

00:00:25.020 good. I don't think it could get better. It can. It's called the simultaneous sip. It

00:00:31.380 makes everything better, and you're about to experience it if you're here live. If you're

00:00:36.860 here recorded, it still works. Still works, but not quite as well as live. And all you

00:00:42.620 need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stein, a canteen jug, a flask, a vessel

00:00:46.020 of any kind, filling with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled

00:00:54.040 pleasure, the dope, mean, hit of the day, the thing that makes everything, everything

00:00:59.700 better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.

00:01:10.440 I'm being asked on YouTube if I only have one sip of coffee per day. That's all I need,

00:01:17.200 this one sip, and I'm good for the whole day. No. Coffee is like money. Do you know what

00:01:26.280 I learned about money when I was an economics major? More is better. It's one of the few

00:01:33.520 things you can say about economics that works every time. Money, more, is better. All right.

00:01:41.320 Would you like to go deep with me? Would you like to go deep? We're going to do some crazy

00:01:47.780 shit right now. All right. Here's where I blow your mind. I did the, I tried this out last 0.99

00:01:54.080 night with my private locals channel. So they've seen this. I'll give you the quick version so

00:02:00.020 they don't have to watch it again. Elon Musk. What's his big plan? Oh, I think I figured

00:02:07.480 it out. Little pattern recognition, and I put it all together. What are the companies

00:02:12.240 that Elon Musk is investing in or owns? Artificial intelligence. He's into that big. Neuralink,

00:02:20.720 the thing that reads your brain waves. Electric cars, but also electric batteries. Batteries,

00:02:27.700 very important to the story. Humanoid-like robots. Tesla announced that they're going to build

00:02:34.540 a robot as a humanoid look. See where I'm going yet? Mission to Mars. See where it is

00:02:45.360 yet? He's going to be the first transhuman. Take your new Neuralink technology, upgraded 1.00

00:02:53.360 a few versions, and pretty soon he has mapped his own mind. And he can take his mind map and

00:02:59.940 add it with all the interviews he's done in public. And you can create Elon version 2.0

00:03:06.940 and put him in a Tesla robot. Not done yet. Not done yet. He isn't just going to be the first

00:03:15.560 transhuman. He's going to be the first transhuman augmented by the most advanced artificial intelligence

00:03:25.200 in the world. Do you see it yet? Do you know how hard it will be to go to Mars if you have a human

00:03:33.340 body? If you're an organic entity? Very hard. You might die. How hard would it be to go to Mars if

00:03:41.940 you were a robot? Much easier. Elon Musk is going to be the first transhuman. He's going to make his base 1.00

00:03:50.460 on Mars and he's going to rule the galaxy by using AI to take over everything that he hasn't already

00:03:59.520 taken over. That's right. Elon Musk has an actual functional plan to become the robot lord of the

00:04:11.460 universe. And I don't think anything can stop him. And by the way, I'm completely serious.

00:04:20.520 There's not a bit of sarcasm or humor in this. I mean, it's funny sounding. But look at the assets

00:04:26.860 he's compiled. He literally has found a way to beat death, in a sense. Because his robot can just

00:04:35.600 keep continuing and it can get upgraded because it'll probably have a trust fund to fund it forever.

00:04:42.260 So he can get new parts, get new AI, upgrade until he's the most powerful entity in the universe

00:04:48.920 and might still control his entire fortune. Because I don't think there's anything that stops a robot

00:04:54.960 from controlling a trust fund if the trust is set up that way. It might need a human to, you know,

00:05:01.760 cosign for the robot or something. But basically you could do it. So the richest person in the

00:05:08.000 universe has found a way to beat death and also rule the universe from his robotic entity in the

00:05:15.380 future. Just thought I'd throw that in there. So you know what's ahead. You want another twist?

00:05:23.000 Oh, I'm not done. Here's the final twist. If you think that my vision of what he's putting

00:05:29.820 together is possible. Oh, and by the way, throw in Starlink, his satellite network,

00:05:36.940 so that his robot will be able to have instant communication around the world without the

00:05:42.280 interference of the government. Because the government could shut down the internet,

00:05:47.040 but they can't shut down Starlink. He will have the only unshuttable network

00:05:52.520 in existence. And he will own it. Or his robot self will.

00:05:59.160 Yeah, his low latency satellite network. But here's the real mind effort. You know that

00:06:07.720 Elon Musk believes in the simulation, right? That we almost certainly are a simulated world

00:06:13.000 and not a real one. And the funny thing about a simulation is if there's even one, there's

00:06:18.820 almost certainly lots of them. Because you wouldn't make just one, right? And even the simulation

00:06:25.100 itself would create sub-simulations. If it were a good simulation, it would invent its own

00:06:31.020 simulations. And so on and so on. Turtles all the way down. Now put those two ideas together.

00:06:39.160 That if the simulation is what reality is, and the numbers strongly suggest it is,

00:06:45.160 and Elon believes it's true. And if it's possible in our simulation to create an Elon Musk robot that

00:06:53.720 looks just like Elon Musk and acts like him, there's a billion to one chance he's already that robot.

00:07:03.800 That's all. That's all. That's all. There's a billion to one chance he's already the robot.

00:07:18.200 All right, that's just for fun. Here's also for fun. I saw a tweet by Paul Collider talking about

00:07:24.420 a person who has invented a solution to basically everything. Okay, I might be exaggerating a little

00:07:32.640 bit, but I think he made a solution to everything. Now, I had a similar idea, but mine wasn't nearly

00:07:40.680 as good. Does anybody remember me talking about heat chimneys as a way to create energy while scrubbing

00:07:48.320 CO2? Does anybody remember me saying that? Now, the way a heat chimney works is you would build,

00:07:55.180 let's say, a mile-high chimney, and you would find that the hot air would go into the bottom of the

00:08:01.520 chimney, and it would rise very quickly, especially if, you know, you've heated the top of the chimney

00:08:07.040 with the sun, let's say. So, because hot air, warm air rises, right? So at the top of the chimney would

00:08:14.060 be cold air. At the bottom coming in would be the warm air. So actually, you don't need to heat

00:08:18.320 the top of the chimney. The air will just automatically go up, I think. Now, this concept

00:08:26.300 has been far, far improved, because it turns out if you have a big enough one of these, let's say you

00:08:33.920 have multiple, you know, mile-high chimneys in the same place, they will actually create clouds.

00:08:41.260 Now, that's something I didn't know. So the temperature differential, and I guess the fact that the warm

00:08:47.940 air is being cooled releases moisture. So what you would do is you would end up creating a rainy

00:08:55.820 climate very locally, like super locally, you would have the weather you wanted. So you could create

00:09:03.340 water out of nothing, create water out of the air. You could use that to farm in places that you

00:09:11.180 couldn't farm before, let's say a desert. And it would grow a bunch of plants that you couldn't grow

00:09:17.900 before. And those plants would capture CO2. So you can capture CO2 by building these seed chimneys,

00:09:26.660 create water, create electricity, capture CO2. And what else does it do? And it's good for growing

00:09:34.860 plants, of course. I suppose if you had a greenhouse, you'd pump CO2 into it. So it improves power

00:09:41.620 generation, stabilizes planetary temperatures, gives you fresh water anywhere, removes CO2.

00:09:51.660 And apparently he's going to compete for the Elon Musk X Prize, the $100 million prize to scrub CO2

00:09:59.160 out of the atmosphere. Now, I imagine that somebody will win that with a different technology.

00:10:06.080 But apparently, from an engineering perspective, there's nothing about this that can't be done.

00:10:13.120 Isn't that cool? There's nothing about this idea that can't be done.

00:10:18.920 So this is all pretty much well understood science. You know, nothing has to be invented.

00:10:24.120 You would just have to engineer it. All right. On a less happy note, the Nordstrom store that is just

00:10:31.680 down the road from me in Walnut Creek, California, was hit by a mob of 50 to 80 people. I think 80 is

00:10:39.880 the official number, who simultaneously had ski masks and clubs and stuff like that, and ran in

00:10:47.640 and just ransacked Nordstrom and ran out to waiting cars. Now, I almost didn't want to talk about this

00:10:56.860 story because you don't want to give people ideas because it totally worked. You know, very few people

00:11:02.080 got arrested because there were just so many of them and nobody saw it coming. But I would like to add

00:11:08.220 this to the simulation. Will there ever be one of these flash mobs of looting the store at exactly the

00:11:17.120 same time a mass shooter is in the same place? Is the simulation going to serve that up to us?

00:11:23.860 Because you have your mass shooters. That's a thing. Way too many of them. And I suspect that this mob

00:11:29.960 looting thing is going to grow. So you can have a bunch of them. Can the simulation ever give us a

00:11:36.380 situation where the mass shooter is in the same place as all the looters? Two problems that solve

00:11:44.540 themselves? That's all I'm saying. I don't think it's likely. But it's a non-zero chance that the

00:11:52.540 mass shooter will kill all the looters and the police will just have to go there and take the

00:11:58.420 bodies away. So it could be a self-correcting problem. If we get enough mass shooters, they will

00:12:07.840 cancel out the mass looting. So that's the optimistic take. I like to look on the optimistic

00:12:14.860 side. Well, Bill Maher continues to make news every single Friday. I guess his show is going to go on

00:12:22.200 hiatus for the winter, so it won't be as much. But he is hammering the Democrats like nobody's ever

00:12:29.880 hammered him. I don't think the right has ever laid a glove on the left, because everybody just

00:12:37.620 stays in their bubble. But when the left is being pummeled by someone who's inside their bubble,

00:12:44.340 I think it hurts a little more. And he's talking about how the Democrats are completely out of touch

00:12:50.900 with America, especially white, non-college-educated America. And he went pretty hard at it.

00:13:00.020 And I ask you this. Why can Bill Maher see this so clearly? I mean, everything he's saying about

00:13:07.280 his team is just 100% accurate. There's just nothing to argue with. Why can he see it? And the others

00:13:15.380 can't. Tell me what you know about human nature, and tell me why he can see it, but his party can't.

00:13:24.380 Somebody says ratings. Follow the money. But I don't think he's doing it for ratings, because he

00:13:30.080 would do better on ratings if he just stuck with a team. The best way you can do ratings is to stick

00:13:36.720 with a team. So he's actually going against his money interests. I think his crowds actually have

00:13:42.320 shifted now. He has more conservatives. But I don't think he did it for the money, because that

00:13:46.040 would have been a dumb play. Like, nobody would have thought that would have worked. And I don't

00:13:51.020 know if it is working. He likes conflict? No. No, that's not it. I mean, he might, but mindset,

00:13:59.920 marijuana, that's not a bad guess. Experience, he understands human motivation. Yeah, there's some

00:14:08.740 of that for sure. Well, I think part of it is because he's tried to put himself in the

00:14:17.400 middle of topics, meaning that to try to see both sides. Here's my take. I think that he's,

00:14:25.120 yeah, maybe mushrooms. Mushrooms might be part of the story. But I think Bill Maher has trained

00:14:31.840 himself to see both sides. That's it. I think it's a skill. I think it's a learned skill. Probably

00:14:40.740 you have to be born with, you know, a little bit of a certain kind of mind. It probably does help.

00:14:46.360 If he had ever experimented with psychedelics, it probably did help to get you out of your box. But I

00:14:52.820 think it's a learned skill. I think by not being slavishly on one side of every topic,

00:14:59.400 his brain is just now optimized to be able to see what other people can't see. Now, by the way,

00:15:07.160 that's a real thing. It's called reticular activation. You know, you know that effect where

00:15:13.860 you can hear your name in a crowded room, but you can't pick out any other words. You know,

00:15:19.040 the background noise will be, Scott, and you'll be like, what? The only thing I heard out of all

00:15:27.620 that rumble was my name, clearly. What's up with that? It's because your brain can tune itself

00:15:33.280 to notice things if you practice. In fact, you can actually practice noticing opportunity.

00:15:42.200 This is a real thing. It's been studied. If you just tell yourself you have good luck and that

00:15:46.520 you're optimistic, everything's going to work out for you, it changes your actual field of view.

00:15:52.560 And you could actually, not field of view, but your perception. You actually see opportunities that

00:15:57.000 you wouldn't have seen before because you can tune your brain to spot things.

00:16:04.500 Here's an example from my own life. As an older teenager, I once found $20 on the ground.

00:16:13.600 And that was a lot of money when I was a teenager. That would be more like $100 today, right?

00:16:18.820 So if you imagine a kid finding something the equivalent of $100 laying on the ground,

00:16:23.360 it causes you to look at the ground a lot. So I somehow became trained to expect money

00:16:30.760 on the ground. Do you know how many times I've found actually cash money, like paper money,

00:16:39.860 on the ground? A lot. I don't know how many times all of you have found actual money on the ground,

00:16:48.360 but I've probably done it 30 times. Cash money, like lots of dollar bills, just laying on the ground

00:16:56.800 next to the road. And it would be a road where lots of other people have walked. And for some reason,

00:17:03.420 I found it and other people didn't see it. A lot of you are saying the same. So my hypothesis is that

00:17:09.700 you can train your brain to see things that other people don't see. Will you accept that? Will you accept

00:17:16.260 the premise that a person can train their brain to notice things that you wouldn't otherwise notice?

00:17:23.540 I think that's fair, right? And I think that somebody like Bill Maher, who makes it his career

00:17:29.360 to at least understand the argument on both sides, I believe he's trained his brain so he can see it.

00:17:36.800 That's all. I think it's as simple as that.

00:17:38.760 All right. MSNBC appears to be sort of a mental health crisis masquerading as a news organization. 0.85

00:17:51.040 And I say that in all seriousness. Because the, I guess the tone and the guests and everything 0.62

00:18:00.580 about MSNBC, and by the way, I don't really see this on CNN. If you watch CNN, it looks like

00:18:06.560 you have angry partisans who are just taking a side. But when you watch MSNBC, it doesn't look

00:18:14.320 exactly like that, does it? CNN is mostly just side-taking. And then just people say whatever

00:18:21.080 the narrative is on their side, they just repeat it. But on MSNBC, it actually looks like a mental

00:18:27.540 health crisis. And I'm not kidding even a little bit, all right? I'm going to be completely serious.

00:18:32.980 It looks like a mental health crisis. And I'll give you even the specific mental health

00:18:39.420 problem. It looks like a vulnerable narcissist or toxic narcissist, you know, there are other 0.67

00:18:47.420 names for it. What are some of the things you would expect from an individual who's a vulnerable

00:18:52.660 narcissist? Let's say you catch them in being wrong. You find out that they have a fact wrong,

00:18:59.380 or you call them out in a lie. How does a vulnerable narcissist respond?

00:19:05.700 They will attack you personally. Right? They attack you personally. They don't say,

00:19:11.980 well, what about your philosophy? They call you a white supremacist. They call you a racist. 0.83

00:19:17.380 They call you a sexist. They call you names. So vulnerable narcissists don't address the argument. 0.92

00:19:23.720 They will call you names. Who does that? CNN a little bit. But MSNBC, it's their whole gig is

00:19:33.520 labeling people as bad people. Now, what's the other thing that vulnerable narcissists do? Far more than

00:19:40.760 the regular public, although I guess we all do it a little. Projection. Yeah, a vulnerable narcissist

00:19:48.280 will rob a bank and then accuse the police of being bank robbers. And the police will say,

00:19:55.440 we're literally police. We literally just caught you walking out of the bank with a gun and a bag of

00:20:02.140 money. And we've got 15 witnesses. And we're the police. We're the police arresting you. The

00:20:09.680 vulnerable narcissist will look right at them and say, you robbed this bank. You're the bank robber. 0.92

00:20:15.460 And everybody who's watching will say, I don't even know what's going on here. Right? You know

00:20:22.460 somebody like that. You know you know somebody like that. They lie and call you a liar. They're

00:20:29.720 racist and they call you a racist. Now, MSNBC has gone full overt racist. In fact, one of their guests 0.99

00:20:38.320 today, somebody named Cross, called, again, called Kyle Rittenhouse, a white supremacist.

00:20:52.080 For which there's no evidence whatsoever and all the evidence which suggests he's not. But on MSNBC,

00:20:59.040 you can actually go full racist and nobody makes a peep. What? What? How is that okay? How is that

00:21:09.640 suddenly okay? All right. To me, that looks like a mental health problem. But here's the thing that

00:21:16.880 really came out of... I'm going to take this in a little bit slightly different direction.

00:21:21.980 The Rittenhouse case tells us the whole problem. I think. And I'm going to go to my white supremacist

00:21:32.480 board. It used to be called a white board. But I've been watching a lot of MSNBC. And I realized that

00:21:38.700 if you call it a white board, you're just buying into white supremacy. So I'm just going to call it a

00:21:43.580 white supremacist white board. So MSNBC has something to talk about. I could call it the black board. 0.51

00:21:51.980 Because as you know, I identify as black. Oh, let me do that. Since I identify as black, 0.69

00:21:58.540 I'll just call it the black board. Because it's my board. It's not your board. It's my board. It's 0.86

00:22:03.640 a black board. All right. So we'll go to the black board. And I'll tell you what I think is the whole

00:22:09.320 problem. In the Rittenhouse case, the most weird, the most bizarre thing happened. And I'll bet all of

00:22:15.640 you saw this. How many of you saw somebody on the left say something like this? If Rittenhouse had been

00:22:24.120 black, what would have happened? How many of you saw somebody say something like that? If Rittenhouse

00:22:31.000 had been black, what would happen? And what did your brain do when you heard that? Didn't your brain 0.99

00:22:39.060 just explode and say, what? What? What is wrong with you? Right? That was your first impression was 0.80

00:22:49.420 probably, what the hell is wrong with you? Why on earth would the race of the people involved make 0.99

00:22:55.920 any difference? Like, how is this racial? It's a whole bunch of white guys. How in the world did 0.66

00:23:02.340 this become a racial question? And by the way, if a black man had done exactly what Kyle Rittenhouse

00:23:09.360 would do, what would the right be asking? When can we vote for him? Am I right? That's what the

00:23:18.660 right would be asking. If exactly the same thing, but Rittenhouse had been black, they would say, 0.67

00:23:24.320 when's he going to run for office? I want to vote for that guy. Now, if you're on the left,

00:23:29.900 you don't get that at all, do you? I don't think there's anybody on the left who understands that

00:23:34.460 even a little bit. Why? Why don't they understand that? I will tell you. Watch this. This is going

00:23:41.640 to blow your mind. Now, I'm going to bring together some things I've said before in different ways.

00:23:46.740 But when I bring this together, I think this is going to blow your freaking mind. Watch this. 0.76

00:23:50.920 Now that I've oversold it. Totally. Here's what I see from the left and the right.

00:24:04.000 What I see is that the left has one filter. They have one filter on life, which is grievance.

00:24:14.500 Their worldview is that whatever their situation is, is caused by other people who did better.

00:24:20.340 Sometimes they did better because they're terrible racists and they had slaves, whatever. But

00:24:26.400 sometimes they just did better for a variety of reasons. But the left only has one filter.

00:24:33.540 What happens to you if you only have one filter? Well, things don't go well. Things don't go well at

00:24:41.260 all. Because life is somewhat subjective, meaning there's not the one preferred way to look at

00:24:48.380 everything and you're done. Rather, you need a variety of filters for a variety of situations.

00:24:55.200 I would argue that on the right, they have a variety of filters. There's your Constitution.

00:25:00.840 And depending on the topic you're talking about, they might be talking about the First Amendment,

00:25:05.260 the Second Amendment, might talk about the court systems. But basically, they have a systems view.

00:25:11.280 Well, we've got a system that takes care of this stuff. They also have a Bible filter, which is also a

00:25:19.400 system. The Bible's a system. It says if you act in this way every day, or as much as you can, you get a

00:25:28.060 payoff in the end. Right? Bible is a system. Constitution is a system. Small government is a system.

00:25:36.700 Small government is a system. Because every day, you have to work at keeping it small.

00:25:42.800 You want to raise my taxes? No. You want to create a new department? No. Right? You have to work at it

00:25:50.300 every day to keep it from growing. That's a system. And the system says if you can keep it small by

00:25:56.120 working at it really hard, getting your Republicans in office, etc., whatever it takes, then you get

00:26:01.500 better results. We don't know the specific result. But overall, if you use these three systems,

00:26:08.820 you get good results on average. Very imperfect. Very imperfect. Right? Systems are imperfect.

00:26:15.700 But the best we have. And then also family is another system. Family isn't a goal. It's a system

00:26:24.600 that for many people works very well, especially if you combine it with the Bible filter.

00:26:30.460 The Bible plus a family. Two good systems that work together pretty well. Now, I remind you that I'm

00:26:37.160 not personally a believer. But it's obvious that as a system, religion works very well with family.

00:26:45.240 In fact, I wish I had that ability to believe because I think it's an advantage in life. I just

00:26:51.140 don't have it. Now, I'm going to take it to the next level. So the first level is that on the right,

00:26:58.580 people have several filters to look through, and they can change out their filters as they need

00:27:03.560 to. Oh, this is a Bible filter. This is a family filter. This is a government filter. This is the 0.80

00:27:09.180 Constitution. So when the Kyle Rittenhouse case comes out, what do the people on the right do?

00:27:15.880 They change their filter to the one that makes sense. They change their filter to the one that

00:27:23.840 fits the situation, the Second Amendment. And they say, self-defense? Okay, we're done here.

00:27:34.160 That's it. I put my filter on it. We have clear evidence of self-defense with firearms.

00:27:39.880 Nothing to see here. It's done. The filter got the same answer as the court system. Right?

00:27:48.420 So nobody on the right was confused when the courts agreed with them that their Second Amendment

00:27:57.260 filter on this was accurate. Now, imagine how lost you would be if you only had one way to look at

00:28:05.160 the world. A grievance filter. And you have a situation that has no race in it whatsoever.

00:28:13.000 But you only have this. That's all you have. Just one filter. You've heard the old saying,

00:28:19.740 if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. That's the problem. The problem is

00:28:25.620 that the MSNBCs and the CNNs of the world have hammered this one filter so much that they only have

00:28:32.720 one. They don't have the ability to do what conservatives do naturally, which is to move

00:28:38.740 back and forth to the filter that makes sense. Now, if you think all these filters are really

00:28:44.020 just the same filter, they're not. Let me give you an example. What happens when your government

00:28:50.160 filter conflicts with your family filter? Trouble. Right? Big trouble. Big, big trouble.

00:28:59.640 All right? So these filters don't always work together. But in a situation like the Rittenhouse

00:29:04.560 case, it's a perfect system. Just put it through the filter. Boom. You predicted. Now, what do I tell

00:29:11.960 you about your filters? Are some filters true, like they really nail reality, and some less true?

00:29:20.760 Is that what I say about filters? No. No. Filters are not about reality. Because we don't have brains that

00:29:29.800 can see reality. Never have. Never will. I don't have one. You don't have one. Einstein didn't have

00:29:36.680 one. Our brains, they never evolved for us to clearly see reality. We're not even close. So we all have

00:29:45.140 this little movie that's playing in our head. So what do I say about filters? How do you know you

00:29:50.800 have a good one? How do you know you have a good filter? What's the one and only way you know it's

00:29:57.800 good? Exactly. Prediction. If your filter accurately predicts, then keep it. And keep it. If it stops

00:30:08.720 predicting, get rid of it. And that's it. Forget about what is true and what is false, because you

00:30:14.800 can't tell. But you can tell if it predicted. Now, whose filter predicted Kyle Rittenhouse would get

00:30:21.120 off? Constitution filter predicted that. And it predicted it with certainty. Am I right? I mean,

00:30:30.100 you were worried, but it was a pretty clean prediction, I think. And what did the people

00:30:37.440 on the left say? What happened? How could this be? Because their filter doesn't predict. Am I

00:30:46.060 right? So if you joined late, the reason that the left and the right can't see the same things

00:30:54.100 is because the right uses different filters on reality, and they use the ones that predict

00:30:59.960 the best. Let's take this one. Small government. Does that predict well? Yeah. Yeah. It predicts

00:31:08.680 that if you add a new bureaucracy, you'll eventually come to regret it. How often is that filter right?

00:31:15.380 A lot. It's really predictive, right? So the grievance filter, unfortunately, can work sometimes.

00:31:24.780 Oh, let me be completely clear about this. This filter can predict sometimes, but not all

00:31:33.080 the time. And if you don't have the ability to switch to other filters, you'll be blinded

00:31:39.520 by your one filter. All you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And that's really

00:31:44.200 what you're seeing on the left. The number of people who said, you know, hey, if Rittenhouse

00:31:52.540 had been black, that was like the Rosetta Stone. The Rittenhouse case was like the Rosetta Stone. 0.90

00:32:02.960 I love making this reference because only 20% of you even know what it means. But 20% of

00:32:07.780 you just said, yeah, I get that. The other 80% said, stop using references. I don't understand.

00:32:13.980 But I don't even know the Rosetta Stone story. But there was some stone that had some code on

00:32:20.080 it that if you had that one stone with that little written code on it, you could decipher

00:32:24.760 this other language that you couldn't get your hands on otherwise. You couldn't figure

00:32:29.360 out the code until you got this one rock. So the Rosetta Stone is the thing that opened

00:32:33.460 up the code. And I think the Rittenhouse case opened up the code so that you can see this

00:32:39.500 clearly. Because before the Rittenhouse case, it wasn't this clear, right? When you watch

00:32:45.640 people who see clear self-defense and they only see race, and it's all white people, that's

00:32:52.540 the Rosetta Stone. Now you know what's going on. Everything is explained by these filters.

00:32:57.880 Right? All right. Smirkanish has an interesting theory, which I agree with 100%. Now I've told

00:33:10.500 you before, and I'll say it again. While I criticize CNN almost nonstop, they do also employ this

00:33:20.120 fellow named Smirkanish, who is closer to reasonable than just about anybody they've ever had on their

00:33:27.540 network. Now he's had me on his show a number of times, twice, three times, different shows. And

00:33:34.480 what better evidence do you need that he's willing to hear both sides, right? So Smirkanish is kind

00:33:44.320 of a Bill Maher personality, as far as I can tell from the outside. Can't read anybody's minds.

00:33:51.060 But he looks like somebody who can see the argument on both sides. So give him a follow. If you don't

00:33:56.900 follow him, he's worthy. There are some people on the left that you just have to follow. Van Jones.

00:34:04.220 You should follow Van Jones, even if you don't agree with him. And Smirkanish. Because those are 0.99

00:34:10.700 two people who can at least see the argument on both sides. And that's worth a lot. So here's his

00:34:17.480 theory about why Biden is so unpopular at the moment, aside from performance itself. Trump is not in the

00:34:25.880 news. So you don't have a, you don't have a contrast. Biden is not being compared to anybody

00:34:34.140 right now. Oh, how do you smell it? Spell it? How do you smell it? Smirkanish is S-M-E-R-C-O-N-I-S-H. 1.00

00:34:45.140 Is his first name Michael? He never uses his first name, it seems like. I don't even know

00:34:51.840 his first name. He seems to use his last name all the time. Anyway, I agree with that. I think

00:34:59.280 Smirkanish is absolutely right. That the longer Trump stays out of the news, the more popular

00:35:07.480 he'll get. Oh, it is Michael. It's Michael Smirkanish. And I 100% agree with that. Trump could become

00:35:15.760 president again by simply making, let's say, ordinary comments about the news instead of Trump

00:35:25.520 comments. You know, a Trump comment always goes too far, which is sort of his signature. His signature

00:35:32.900 move is to go too far, because that's what makes it exciting. That's what makes you look at it. That's

00:35:39.420 what draws your attention. That's what controls the energy, right? So at least one part of it is

00:35:45.460 that Trump is not there to create the hated alternative to Biden. Now, that's not the only

00:35:52.700 reason, right? Yeah, provocative. When I say goes too far, you could say provocative. That would be

00:35:59.520 another way to say it. I saw this tweet by Mike Cernovich the other day. I swear to God, I just

00:36:09.000 read that thing over and over again, because it was just so beautiful. It was beautifully provocative.

00:36:15.160 Now, I didn't quite, you know, agree with all the content in it. It was an opinion piece. But man,

00:36:23.200 can Cernovich write provocative tweets? Like, you can't look away. It's like, ah,

00:36:29.520 I want to agree with it, but I can't. But I want to. Goes too far. You know, that's just a perfect

00:36:36.120 tweet. And Trump has that same skill. If we were to create, if somebody created a news channel that

00:36:46.940 was 100% real news, as if you could really do that. But they tried really hard to make it unbiased.

00:36:52.240 Who would watch it? Not many people is the answer. And there's a reason for that. Because

00:36:59.680 real news isn't that interesting. It's only the fake news that gets us interested. It's the fake

00:37:06.580 stuff that we care about. Now, of course, we learned that the hard way through social media's

00:37:14.160 algorithms. And we discovered that if it fed us up more fake news, we clicked on it more.

00:37:20.720 So, of course, we got into this situation, honestly, I guess. And, but here, I'm here to tell

00:37:28.100 you that every once in a while you hear this, hey, if somebody invents a network with real news,

00:37:33.800 think of how popular that will be. No, nobody's going to watch it. Let me give you an analogy,

00:37:40.020 because you like those, right? They're so convincing analogies. All right, here's one.

00:37:46.500 If somebody invents a healthy food, everybody will stop eating the bad stuff. You know, if it tastes

00:37:52.140 good. But if somebody makes some healthy food that tastes pretty good, man, obesity's done.

00:37:59.460 No, no, because people like unhealthy food. The same way they like fake news. Junk food and fake

00:38:07.160 news are basically just the same stimulus. It's just shit that's not good for you, but 1.00

00:38:12.700 sure feels fun while it's happening. So forget about your unbiased news. You'll never see that. 1.00

00:38:20.520 Meanwhile, the FBI has turned against the country and against the citizens. And I think we could just

00:38:26.300 say that directly at this point. The FBI is no longer on the side of the citizens of the United States.

00:38:32.240 I think maybe it used to be, or maybe we just didn't know how bad it was. But at this point,

00:38:38.000 I think the news is painting us a pretty clear picture of the FBI being a corrupt organization

00:38:45.260 that probably needs to be, you know, it needs to be dismantled and put back together, I think.

00:38:52.920 There's something wrong with it, deeply. Now, at the moment, it's, I guess it did a raid

00:38:58.160 on a school board activist named Sharona Bishop. Imagine an FBI breaking down the door

00:39:06.520 of somebody who's just a citizen, who's just an activist on the school boards. And I guess

00:39:12.360 she's helped flip nine local school boards. I don't know what flipped means, but does that

00:39:17.680 mean get new people in there or something? Or to get them to, I don't know, whatever she's 0.85

00:39:22.920 doing to flip them. But can you imagine any scenario in which it makes sense for the FBI

00:39:31.500 to break down the door of a mother, a mom, a mom who is just an activist about what's good

00:39:39.460 for her kids? And by the way, nobody is accusing her of a crime that I know of. Is she even accused

00:39:47.140 of a crime? I didn't see that in the story. There must have been something she was accused

00:39:51.380 of. Was it taxes? Oh, supposedly wire fraud. And it was the wire fraud supposedly about taxes

00:40:03.840 too, or not paying them or whatever. They cuffed her? Are you fucking kidding me? They cuffed 0.94

00:40:12.080 her? In front of her kids? Did they fucking cuff a mother in front of her kids for a suspicious 1.00

00:40:21.360 violation of a white collar crime? I suppose they have to do that, but I sure hope not. 0.99

00:40:28.760 God. You know, the FBI does seem purely political at this point. And even if they had a good reason

00:40:37.180 for this, you know, we could learn out later. We could learn later they had a good reason.

00:40:41.180 But they don't, they don't earn our trust. So this is still, we're still in the fog of war

00:40:47.820 on the story. So if tomorrow it turns out that she was a, you know, horrible terrorist or something

00:40:52.980 and the FBI had good information about it, or whatever. So if it turns out tomorrow that the FBI

00:40:58.040 was just right to do this, I can't see how, but you could be surprised. Mother cuffers. Those mother 0.97

00:41:05.720 cuffers. Nice. Nicely done. Mother cuffers. Mother cuffers. Now I'm just going to be thinking about that

00:41:16.800 all day because that's too good. All right. Anyway, the FBI, we don't trust them. So if we hear a story

00:41:24.780 that could go either way, and I think this is one of those stories that could probably go either way.

00:41:29.160 You know, you could easily imagine that tomorrow we'll learn something that supports the FBI's action,

00:41:34.860 but maybe not. And I'm saying that if there's a benefit of a doubt, they don't, they don't earn it

00:41:39.880 anymore. I think the court system still deserves a benefit of a doubt. You could disagree with that,

00:41:47.340 but I think our court system is good enough. I give them the benefit of a doubt when I'm not sure

00:41:52.020 exactly why they did what they did. Usually. I think they usually get it right. But the FBI has lost

00:41:58.620 the benefit of a doubt. Am I right? Has the FBI forfeited the benefit of a doubt? When I hear a bad

00:42:07.340 story about the FBI, I'm going to automatically assume it's probably true from now on. And I would

00:42:12.900 have maybe automatically assumed it was not true in the past. Yeah. I think they've lost the

00:42:18.780 presumption of innocence. Woundly. I mean, if individuals, of course, still have the presumption

00:42:24.540 of innocence. But as an organization, they have lost the presumption of innocence. That's pretty

00:42:30.600 fucking bad. All right. You know, I turned on the news and it was just one topic that they can't 0.99

00:42:39.560 stop talking about, which is why Joe Biden did not release his cognitive test results. Or did he have

00:42:46.380 one? You know, have you seen any other news today? It's like all over the headlines. Oh, no, it isn't.

00:42:53.520 I'm the only one talking about it. It's not in any headline anywhere. Now, I'm not the guy who

00:43:00.620 usually does the, well, what if this was Trump? Because that just bores the hell out of me. It's

00:43:05.320 too easy. Whenever you do the, if this were Trump, you know, I mean, often there's a point

00:43:13.540 to be made in that. But it's so easy and so common that I hate to say it. But if this had

00:43:21.560 been Trump, sometimes you just have to say it. If this had been Trump, it would have been

00:43:28.680 the only headline. Where's his cognitive test? Where's his cognitive test? And of course,

00:43:34.900 Trump passed. I mean, that's what we hear. And Biden is obviously degraded. Obviously to

00:43:43.700 everybody. There's nobody who doesn't see it. Right. And we're not even talking about, we're

00:43:50.100 not even talking about a cognitive test. We are so brainwashed. You see it really clearly 0.92

00:43:57.820 in a case like this. And it's not because Trump would have been treated differently. You could

00:44:02.560 take Trump completely out of the story. Where's his cognitive test? He's obviously cognitively

00:44:09.080 challenged or at least cognitively at risk. Right. And so you don't need Trump in the story

00:44:16.260 to say what the hell is going on. All right. Apparently Kenosha didn't have anything that

00:44:24.920 looked like a protest. People gathered, but they seem to have talked it out or something.

00:44:31.200 And I'd said before the verdict that it looked like low energy in Kenosha. And Martin Cohen

00:44:38.620 said in a tweet, and I'm leaning in this direction. It might be an overstatement, but I'm leaning

00:44:46.680 in the following direction to agree with Martin, who says, Martin says that he predicted no protests

00:44:52.800 after the Rittenhauser thing, because the original protests, meaning the protests which Rittenhouse

00:44:58.220 had attended originally, had the goal of defeating the president. And now that Trump is out, no more

00:45:05.340 protests for a while. I hate to say that feels right. Am I right? Because there's nothing that

00:45:16.220 happened that would have changed the protests from then to now. Do you remember the Wall Street

00:45:22.560 protests about, what was it, income inequality? And those protests just went away. Did our income

00:45:32.280 inequality get fixed? No. The protests were never real. The protests were never real. They were,

00:45:42.160 yeah, Occupy Wall Street, exactly. The Occupy Wall Street, now we know, never was about a topic. It

00:45:49.340 must have been some political thing. Now we know that BLM is mostly some kind of political

00:45:55.600 instrument and has nothing to do with their issues. Now, I'm overstating it, right? There are plenty

00:46:01.500 of people who would say they're part of BLM who do care about the issues, including me. Because

00:46:06.760 actually, I think BLM's issues are good issues. You know, there's a whole separate question of how

00:46:13.420 they're going about it. But in terms of, are the police treating minority people worse? I don't know,

00:46:22.280 because I don't really have a window into that. But if 30% or whatever of your country thinks that

00:46:29.000 the police are discriminating against certain types of people, I'm going to take that really

00:46:33.380 seriously. Whatever it is, right? Because if I were in that 30%, I'd want you to take it seriously.

00:46:40.820 Even if I were wrong. Even if it was just in my mind. Even if I were bringing it upon myself by the

00:46:47.040 way I act when police come. I'd still want you to be looking into this as a fellow citizen.

00:46:52.240 Which sounds sexist? Fellow? Right? Somebody says I'm in the 30%. Yeah, I mean, I identify as black,

00:47:02.020 but since the police won't know that, I think I would be able to get off.

00:47:08.640 All right, anyway. So I think protests you have to see as fake. Really, from this point on,

00:47:15.260 I would say any protests you see on the left that doesn't have support on the right. You know,

00:47:20.500 let's say if we're protesting a war, some new war, you can see that that would be a valid protest. 0.98

00:47:27.280 But so far, the ones we've seen most recently are apparently all fake protests. That doesn't mean

00:47:32.800 that the individuals aren't real. Let me be as clear as possible. I think the individuals

00:47:39.200 probably had legitimate, you know, grievances and wanted to protest about it. But the reason that

00:47:46.860 they showed up at all was because somebody was pulling the strings. Right? You can have

00:47:52.040 grievances about a lot of stuff and not protest. I got plenty of grievances. I didn't protest at

00:47:57.620 all today. But the thing that activates people to hit the streets is obviously coming from some

00:48:02.340 source. I don't know what source. You think it's George Soros? I don't think so, but can't rule

00:48:08.720 anything out. I saw a graph today. Adam Dopamine tweeted around. And it seemed to show that vaccinations,

00:48:18.340 you know, help, but not a lot. That's what the data showed. It showed that, yeah, it does protect you

00:48:27.400 from hospitalization and stuff, but not a ton. You know, it's like maybe twice as good where we thought

00:48:34.500 it was eight times as good or something like that. But it took about a minute and a half for

00:48:39.040 Andres Backhouse to debunk it. Apparently it's been debunked before. So if you see that graph,

00:48:45.600 it's a fake graph. It's taken out of context, blah, blah, blah. Read the footnotes. So if you see

00:48:52.860 any graph on the internet, what is your first reaction to it? If you see data about vaccinations,

00:48:59.540 doesn't matter what the data says, and it's on Twitter, what should be your first response?

00:49:08.960 Seriously unlikely to be true. If I had put a percentage on it, I would say that any data

00:49:15.500 on vaccinations that you see on Twitter, 90 to 95% fake, at least the odds of it. I'm not saying

00:49:26.260 all of it is 95% fake. I'm saying if there's a new graph or finding or data about vaccinations or masks

00:49:34.440 or shutdowns or anything about the pandemic, and it's on social media, 90 to 95% chance it's false. And

00:49:43.500 by the way, same percentage if it comes from the government. I'm not going to change that

00:49:49.520 depending on the source. I don't care about the source. CDC, FDA, Pfizer, it doesn't matter the

00:49:57.180 source. If it's about the pandemic, just assume there's about 90 to 95% chance it's not true.

00:50:03.940 And you'll be in good shape. Okay. So that is my show for the day.

00:50:10.900 I don't know what the other live streamers are doing, but they're not talking about Elon Musk's

00:50:17.300 transhumanism galactic conquest. And I don't think anybody's talking to you about why the left 0.98

00:50:24.480 doesn't have enough filters to understand reality.

00:50:31.460 Is Alex Berenson in the 5%? I'm being asked. Alex Berenson, as far as I know, has, I've never

00:50:38.660 seen him be right with any data. That doesn't mean he's never had any data that's correct.

00:50:44.900 I'll just say that I've never seen anything from him that wasn't obviously wrong and got debunked

00:50:51.880 within minutes of hitting the internet. Now your, your mileage might differ. Maybe you're seeing

00:50:57.000 different stuff now. And let me be clear. I'm pro Alex Berenson, which might surprise you

00:51:04.600 because you need some of him and lots of them actually in a situation like this, because you

00:51:12.160 don't want to just blindly say, Oh, data science. Okay. Let's do it. You need somebody like him

00:51:18.440 who's pushing on everything. I mean, he's basically pushing back on everything that comes out about the

00:51:23.980 pandemic. How often is he going to be right when he says that the government is wrong? How often is he

00:51:30.440 going to be correct? A lot, a lot, right? If all you did is say the government's lying and then you

00:51:39.720 waited, how often would you be right? A lot, a lot, right? So saying that the government's data and

00:51:46.620 numbers and promises are bullshit, you need an Alex Berenson and lots of them because a lot of it is 1.00

00:51:54.360 bullshit. And you need people out there who have a public platform to warn the public. Now, but the 1.00

00:52:01.440 second part of that is when Alex Berenson is creating or boosting his own data. I don't think he creates

00:52:07.360 it, but he's finding data somewhere that's not from the government. And then he boosts it. When he does

00:52:13.960 that, he's wrong almost every time. Because not only is the government producing numbers that are

00:52:21.360 bullshit, but so is everybody else. There's nobody who's giving you good data. So it doesn't matter if 0.99

00:52:28.900 it's Alex Berenson or anybody else. Fauci, it doesn't matter. Whoever is showing you data is misleading

00:52:36.400 you because it's almost never right. And you don't know. I mean, 5% of it might be right, but you don't

00:52:43.060 know which 5%. Now, I do think that you might be able to find, like, big trends. So I still think

00:52:52.200 it's very likely that the vaccinations help. That's my current view, subject to change. And like Bill

00:52:58.960 Maher, I have trained myself that I can get out of my bubble if I need to. Meaning that if the weight

00:53:06.080 of information starts moving the other way, I'll just change my mind. And then I'll say, huh,

00:53:13.360 you know, I took a guess. Because we're all guessing. We're all guessing. If you think the

00:53:19.200 vaccination is a bad idea for you, specifically, you could be right. And you could be wrong. But the

00:53:26.360 only thing I know for sure is you're guessing. It's not about data, because we don't have any reliable

00:53:31.420 data about anything. So I could easily change my mind to, oh, it was a big mistake. I wish I

00:53:36.420 hadn't gotten those vaccinations. Easily. Easily. So if you think I'm locked in to a pro-vaccination

00:53:44.060 stand, I never have been. Never have been. I'm always open to even obvious things that everybody

00:53:51.340 says is true being not true. Because it happens a lot. Does RFK Jr. have the voice problem I had?

00:54:01.100 I don't think so. I think he has a different problem. I looked into it a little bit, and

00:54:06.240 it doesn't sound like they call his problem the same as my problem. All right.

00:54:13.360 How Boo is doing well. Gaining weight.

00:54:18.020 20 beds of mostly vaccinated coughing people. So here are some other things that you should

00:54:24.440 ignore. The number of vaccinated people who are catching it. Almost all the data on that is

00:54:32.180 anti-context or fake data. Let me say it again. 100% of any data you see about vaccinated people

00:54:40.700 getting infected, I wouldn't trust any of it. It might be true. But I don't think you can trust it.

00:54:48.180 I think all the data is out of context, poorly organized, poorly presented, willfully misinterpreted.

00:54:55.980 That's the world we're in. Just look at Israel data. No. No. No. No, no, no. No, and no, and no. 0.72

00:55:06.440 And somebody on here is going to say, well, then just look at Sweden. No. No, no, no, no, no, no.

00:55:11.880 No. Don't look at Sweden. You will learn nothing. Because why? You can't trust any of the data.

00:55:19.280 Look at Israel. Do you trust the data? No. Do you know why you shouldn't trust data coming out of 0.98

00:55:25.480 Israel? Is it because I'm anti-Semitic? No. I'm not. Is it because it's coming from Israel? No. No. 0.89

00:55:35.600 It's because it's data. And it's about the pandemic. And you can't trust any of it.

00:55:40.060 But if every country is coming to the same conclusion with all their data doing it different

00:55:46.540 ways, then in a way you can do a poor man's meta-analysis and say, well, basically every

00:55:53.640 major country says these vaccinations are worth it. That doesn't mean they are. But at least

00:56:02.720 it's sort of a poor man's meta-analysis that everything seems to be pointing in the same

00:56:07.080 direction. Take, for example, the fake news always, whenever it's wrong, it's wrong against

00:56:14.300 conservatives. Again, that's not a coincidence. Right? So you could not know anything about any

00:56:22.080 individual story that's fake news and be uncertain whether it's true or not. But you can certainly

00:56:27.300 see the big picture. That if it's fake, it's going to be bad for conservatives, basically.

00:56:34.320 All right. You, the uninformed prole, aren't qualified to research or analyze your facts. Scott

00:56:46.300 is, though. So somebody on Locals is saying that I'm saying that I think they're characterizing

00:56:53.600 me as saying that I'm qualified to look into stuff and research it, but you're not. Is that

00:56:59.180 the way you're hearing? Is anybody else hearing that? Does anybody hear me say that, oh, no,

00:57:04.900 unlike you, I can tell when the data is accurate? No. It's exactly the fucking opposite.

00:57:13.600 If there's anything I could tell you clearly is I can't tell what's real. If you think you can, 0.98

00:57:20.140 you're fucked up. All right. You're fucked up. If you think you can read any of this pandemic data 1.00

00:57:27.340 and know what's true and what isn't, you're just fucked up. All right. Which is not to say that 1.00

00:57:35.560 you won't get some right. You will get some right by chance. You're dismissive of the data as an

00:57:42.020 average. Correct. I'm dismissive of the data on average. Crowder made a good point. Obvious,

00:57:49.520 but scared people are controllable people. Yeah. Scared people are controllable people.

00:57:54.580 Have you seen what's happening in Gibraltar? No. Oh, oh, oh. You paid $10 to tell me that I should

00:58:04.120 look at data and believe it? Really? Are you hearing anything I'm saying? You paid $10 and you thought

00:58:14.880 you would convince me with your one anecdote about one country that probably has bad data

00:58:19.960 and Gibraltar. Here's what you should take away from the Gibraltar. So Gibraltar is almost all

00:58:27.940 vaccinated and they're still having problems. Here's what you should take away from the Gibraltar data.

00:58:35.340 Nothing. The moment you think that some data that agrees with you is right, you're lost.

00:58:42.420 None of it is believable. Some of it is right, but none of it is credible. So the moment you say some

00:58:50.260 of this data is credible, you're into dream world. You're just hallucinating because none of it is.

00:58:57.700 All right. And by far, it's the exceptions that are the least believable. So of all the data that's

00:59:05.440 not believable, if any of it is the exception, that is the least believable of an unbelievable

00:59:12.080 bunch. So anything you want to say about Sweden is unbelievable. Anything about Israel, unbelievable,

00:59:18.340 extra unbelievable. And anything about Gibraltar is extra unbelievable. So your examples are the

00:59:24.900 most unbelievable of a category which is unbelievable by its nature. All right. Well, do you think the

00:59:34.160 vax rate data is wrong or the case rate data is wrong? So Robin is asking me what specifically

00:59:40.840 I think is wrong with the data in Gibraltar? It's fucking data. I don't know how I can make 0.99

00:59:50.120 this more clear. See, maybe I can do it on the whiteboard. Because for some reason, I'm having

00:59:59.300 trouble communicating this concept. Oh, let me get rid of this. I think this was an idea

01:00:08.800 that I decided not to do. Too controversial. All right. So I'm going to try to clarify this

01:00:22.620 point. Can you all see me? All right. So if it's data, if it's data, it's equal to, now this is going

01:00:38.860 to be an equation. So you're not all going to be able to follow the math. So if it's data,

01:00:45.560 it's equal to a big pile of steaming bullshit. Now I'll put some flies around here because I don't 0.99

01:00:59.020 want you to be confused. There's some flies. All right. Steaming bullshit right here. Now I didn't draw

01:01:10.960 the cow. Now you could use this filter to answer a lot of your specific questions. And let me do that

01:01:18.960 for you. Scott, what do you think about the data from Gibraltar? Let me see. Well, let me run it

01:01:27.460 through the filter. It's data. So it's equal to steaming pile of bullshit. So the Gibraltar data 0.96

01:01:40.660 is unreliable. What about Israel? Good point. I got a good point here. What about the data from

01:01:48.060 Israel? Well, let's run it through the filter. See what comes out. It's data. So it's equal to 0.97

01:01:57.540 steaming pile of fucking bullshit. Steaming pile of fucking bullshit. Now let's do one more because 1.00

01:02:05.140 I don't, I know some of you are not following it. What about the data from Sweden? Sweden.

01:02:12.240 Sweden. Well, it's data. It's equal to fucking bullshit. Now, if anybody didn't understand

01:02:24.420 the algorithm, there might be somebody in your circle who can explain it to you better.

01:02:30.680 All right. Well, maybe I made my point. But I know somebody out here is still going to

01:02:43.120 ask me, but what about this data? But what about the CDC? All right. That's all I got for

01:02:49.100 today. And I will talk to you maybe later today or maybe tomorrow.

01:02:54.040 is I don't understand in which data of Israel is BS, the vaccination data or the infection rate.

01:03:05.720 Should I answer this question? Let me answer this question. It says, I don't understand which data

01:03:10.820 in Israel is the BS. Are you talking about the vaccination rate or the infection rate? Well, 0.78

01:03:15.480 let's run it through the filter. We'll see the vaccination rate. Well, that's data.

01:03:24.040 And then that would be equal to, if I'm doing this right, steaming pile of fucking bullshit. 1.00

01:03:32.400 Okay. So that was the, that's the vaccination rate. But if we looked at the infection rate, 1.00

01:03:37.180 which is completely different. So let's run that through the filter too. So that would be a data.

01:03:43.480 And then how does this work again? Can somebody remind me how this algorithm works? It's a,

01:03:53.060 oh, I got it. I got it. I got it. It's data. So it's equal steaming pile of fucking bullshit.

01:03:59.880 Now I'll, I'll read your comments to see if there are anybody else who has any, uh, any more 1.00

01:04:04.580 questions. Okay. Okay. Okay. Yeah. I think, I think we're getting very close to making the point.

01:04:14.320 Very close. All right. That's all for today. I will talk to you tomorrow.

01:04:20.560 Bye.

01:04:37.300 Bye.

01:04:37.820 Bye.

01:04:38.220 Bye.

01:04:38.500 Bye.

01:04:39.140 Bye.

01:04:43.780 Bye.

01:04:48.340 Bye.

01:04:48.380 Bye.

01:04:48.480 Bye.

01:04:49.500 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 21, 2021

Episode 1569 Scott Adams： How We Confuse Politics With Mental Health Problems. They Are Actually Different

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript