Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1574 Scott Adams： Today's Live Stream Will Be Exceptional

00:00:00.000 Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, da-da.

00:00:04.340 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that's ever happened to you.

00:00:09.420 Yeah, I know that's a big claim, but I'm going to back it up.

00:00:12.380 By the end of this live stream, you're going to say to yourself,

00:00:15.260 wow, that might have been the best thing that's ever happened to me.

00:00:19.200 And you've had sex, so that's how good it is. 0.55

00:00:23.640 Now, if you'd like to make it extra, extra good, what would you do?

00:00:30.000 That's right, that's right. You all got it right.

00:00:32.400 You'd have the simultaneous sip, and all you'd do is a cup or mug or a glass or a tank or a chalice or a stein,

00:00:36.520 a canteen jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind,

00:00:39.600 fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:43.320 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:48.640 the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better except shopping.

00:00:52.860 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:55.520 Happens now. Go.

00:01:00.000 Mmm. Yeah. Yeah, that's good.

00:01:04.780 Well, happy Black Friday, as the racists call it.

00:01:08.780 I call it All Day Friday or All People Friday. 0.62

00:01:12.780 Yeah. It's All People Friday.

00:01:15.800 Because it turns out that you're allowed to...

00:01:18.520 What was that?

00:01:22.380 Something bad just happened.

00:01:23.680 Anyway, it turns out that you're allowed to shop today, even if you're not black. 0.68

00:01:28.980 So it's called Black Friday, but it turns out everybody can shop, which I feel is very open-minded.

00:01:35.560 So happy All People Friday.

00:01:37.100 I don't know if I told you my play with Rob Reiner's tweet, and it's a play that I use a lot.

00:01:50.000 Now, you know how the left and the right are in their own news bubbles and social media bubbles,

00:01:55.840 and they don't see much from the other side.

00:01:57.300 So if you're trying to persuade the other side, how do you do it?

00:02:06.780 There's something very loud happening outside my house.

00:02:10.560 It doesn't sound good.

00:02:13.080 I don't know what it is, but there's heavy equipment right outside my house.

00:02:17.220 I hope nobody called the wrecking crew.

00:02:19.140 That is a terrible prank, by the way.

00:02:20.940 Never hire a wrecking crew for your neighbor's house.

00:02:25.740 Somebody actually did that prank once.

00:02:27.920 Anyway, my play with Rob Reiner's tweet in which he said he had a bunch of stuff wrong about the Rittenhouse case.

00:02:35.700 He said in November 23rd...

00:02:38.020 Now, remember, by November 23rd, the entire country should know the actual story of Rittenhouse.

00:02:45.300 Well, listen to how bad his version was, and I'll add something to what I've said before about this.

00:02:50.080 An underage kid illegally took an assault rifle across state lines.

00:02:55.500 Nope. Nope.

00:02:57.960 Didn't take it across state lines, and it wasn't illegal.

00:03:02.700 And that's why there were no charges.

00:03:05.400 Now, there were charges that were dropped, but by the time they went to a verdict,

00:03:09.300 there were no charges about any gun-related thing.

00:03:12.260 Now, how could you not know that?

00:03:14.340 Well, you'd have to be in a pretty deep bubble, right?

00:03:16.160 Now, I saw some people saying, oh, they know it.

00:03:19.340 They know the gun wasn't illegal.

00:03:21.600 They're just saying that.

00:03:23.540 No.

00:03:24.800 No, they really don't know.

00:03:27.280 The level of ignorance that...

00:03:32.180 Let me be fair.

00:03:33.020 It's on both sides, left and right.

00:03:35.620 The level of ignorance that both sides have about each other's news is really shocking.

00:03:41.860 And if you don't think that's the whole story here, you think that they're just lying,

00:03:47.340 and of course they know the real story, I don't think so.

00:03:50.520 I would place a very large bet that when Rob Reiner wrote this tweet, he did not know the actual story,

00:03:57.560 because their news doesn't report it.

00:03:59.380 Well, it does report it, but it reports it inaccurately.

00:04:01.860 So let me tell you my play here.

00:04:04.380 My play is not to embarrass Rob Reiner, because I don't care about him individually.

00:04:09.440 And my play is not to convince a whole bunch of people on the right,

00:04:15.660 because they already got the correct news.

00:04:18.980 So how do I reach the people on the left?

00:04:20.900 Well, here's my hypothesis, and I think it's fairly accurate,

00:04:27.200 which is that blue check Twitter people kind of pay attention to the other blue checks.

00:04:33.960 Am I right?

00:04:36.200 Now, if you don't have a blue check next to your name, you may not have experienced this.

00:04:40.860 But I can tell you that I regularly...

00:04:43.540 I try to look at most of my comments.

00:04:45.580 But on top of that, I also try to look at...

00:04:52.580 There's somebody at my door, and I'm going to have to figure out what's going on here,

00:04:56.000 because something big is happening right outside my door right now.

00:05:00.340 Sorry.

00:05:01.160 I better check on this, see if it's anything important.

00:05:09.460 I'll show you what it is.

00:05:10.640 It's a bird sitting in front of my security camera.

00:05:19.560 So there's that bird.

00:05:23.100 There's one bird a day that walks...

00:05:24.800 I think it's the same bird.

00:05:25.820 It just walks in front of my security camera every day.

00:05:28.640 All right, so I'm not being attacked.

00:05:30.740 Now, I'm a little bit extra cautious,

00:05:33.540 because my neighborhood's been hit with a crime wave

00:05:36.200 of people literally breaking through a window

00:05:38.960 and carrying your stuff away while you're home.

00:05:42.000 So it's a dangerous neighborhood at the moment.

00:05:45.180 Anyway, my play with Rob Reiner is to get him to see my comment,

00:05:49.440 because I'm a blue check,

00:05:51.260 and to see if I can break through.

00:05:53.060 And here's what I want him to feel.

00:05:56.540 I don't need him to be embarrassed.

00:05:58.440 I don't need him to tweet something different.

00:06:00.920 I want him to look at my tweet and say,

00:06:03.940 there's somebody with a blue check

00:06:06.120 who has different news for me,

00:06:08.960 and he's saying it right out loud.

00:06:11.320 Maybe I should look at this

00:06:12.580 and see which one of us is wrong.

00:06:15.860 So that's the play.

00:06:17.420 I'm trying only to convince Rob Reiner that his news is wrong.

00:06:20.900 I'm not even trying to change his opinion.

00:06:23.100 So there's no politics in it.

00:06:25.340 I'm just trying to convince people that they're watching fake news.

00:06:28.760 That, I think, is doable.

00:06:30.920 I think that's doable, especially with the Rittenhouse case.

00:06:33.880 It's like the, as I said,

00:06:36.660 it's like the Rosetta Stone

00:06:38.240 for unlocking all the fake news on the left.

00:06:41.700 All right, well, the Washington Post,

00:06:43.960 as Dinesh D'Souza points out,

00:06:47.640 the Washington Post is, quote,

00:06:50.020 working hard to deny human agency to black criminals. 1.00

00:06:53.400 This is Dinesh's take on it, about Waukesha.

00:06:57.540 And you've seen this, right?

00:06:58.640 Where the news is talking as if the SUV,

00:07:02.840 driven by a black man,

00:07:04.680 which unfortunately matters in 2021,

00:07:07.400 you have to say the ethnicity,

00:07:08.920 because we're all talking about it, right?

00:07:10.760 Shouldn't matter, but does.

00:07:12.880 And this is how the Washington Post

00:07:18.160 described part of that.

00:07:19.380 It said, quote,

00:07:20.780 the SUV then drove down Main Street.

00:07:25.280 What, by itself?

00:07:28.540 The SUVs have gone rogue now?

00:07:30.900 They're killing people on their own?

00:07:33.800 Well, I don't think so.

00:07:35.120 I think there was a person who drove the car.

00:07:37.960 And a person drove down the street in his SUV.

00:07:40.380 And when you see how much torture

00:07:44.300 they have to give themselves

00:07:45.560 to write a sentence like that,

00:07:48.400 you know something's happening, right?

00:07:51.280 Something's at the breaking point.

00:07:53.500 You can almost feel it.

00:07:55.540 By the way, do you feel it?

00:07:56.660 You could feel it when Ahmaud Arbery's father,

00:08:02.640 who you would imagine would be saying

00:08:05.500 something like Black Lives Matter

00:08:06.980 because his son was killed,

00:08:09.900 he said all lives matter,

00:08:11.300 and he made a big deal about it.

00:08:12.920 In public, all lives matter, period.

00:08:15.100 I don't want anybody's father 1.00

00:08:16.820 to have to go through what I'm going through.

00:08:20.240 And I feel as if, you know,

00:08:24.460 the longer Trump is out of the news,

00:08:27.060 that the realization that,

00:08:29.280 especially on the left,

00:08:30.600 that they've been completely duped

00:08:32.280 by their news and by their own party,

00:08:35.300 I feel like people are catching on now.

00:08:38.300 So, you know, the Rob Reiner tweet,

00:08:40.200 I give him a little nudge.

00:08:42.520 But there are a whole bunch of nudges going on here.

00:08:45.140 And it feels like people are starting to see it.

00:08:47.940 But the best comment about this SUV

00:08:49.800 driving down the street

00:08:51.080 came from Twitter user Jill.

00:08:54.980 Who asked this question?

00:08:57.520 Who invented the SUV?

00:08:59.860 Clearly, they're the responsible party here.

00:09:02.280 I mean, I don't think a minivan would do this.

00:09:07.800 Good point.

00:09:09.940 SUVs can be bastards.

00:09:11.840 We all know that.

00:09:13.440 Sometimes when you're sleeping,

00:09:14.900 the SUV will just take off,

00:09:16.700 party all night,

00:09:17.800 come back with less gas than you knew you had.

00:09:20.020 And the SUVs are really well-known bad boys.

00:09:25.360 But the minivans?

00:09:26.840 Well, the minivans are sort of the nerds

00:09:29.700 of the automotive world.

00:09:31.440 Very efficient.

00:09:33.120 Very well designed for utility.

00:09:35.740 But your minivan is never going to

00:09:38.160 steal the money from your wallet

00:09:40.220 and go on a joyride on its own.

00:09:42.960 But an SUV?

00:09:44.060 No, SUVs are bastards.

00:09:45.240 You know, I have an SUV.

00:09:50.400 Ever since I heard about this incident,

00:09:54.480 I have to put blocks on the wheels at night.

00:09:59.340 Because I don't know what that damn thing's doing

00:10:01.180 when I'm not watching.

00:10:03.400 So, all right, next story.

00:10:05.820 Wall Street Journal editorial board

00:10:07.720 just went viciously at Biden.

00:10:10.680 And I love this attack.

00:10:13.660 I usually don't like to call out

00:10:15.400 the hypocrisy stuff.

00:10:17.460 Because if you do that,

00:10:18.940 that's all you're talking about.

00:10:20.800 Because the political parties

00:10:22.120 don't really try too hard

00:10:23.720 to do what they say you should do.

00:10:27.040 So it's usually just sort of boring

00:10:29.080 and try to call that out.

00:10:30.680 But this is a big and unusual case.

00:10:33.800 Because Biden's proposition was

00:10:37.900 you can't have a president

00:10:39.280 who has allowed this many people

00:10:40.680 to die on his watch,

00:10:42.200 meaning COVID.

00:10:43.900 But Biden's death count

00:10:45.340 has surpassed Trump's.

00:10:47.620 And that's after the vaccination.

00:10:50.580 Now, am I going to tell you

00:10:52.740 that Trump did a better job

00:10:54.660 than Biden?

00:10:57.160 Nope.

00:10:58.120 I am not going to tell you that.

00:10:59.660 Because I told you

00:11:00.520 from the beginning of the pandemic,

00:11:02.680 and I'm the only one,

00:11:04.180 if anybody would like to fact check this,

00:11:06.020 I'm making a very big claim here.

00:11:08.160 that I'm the only one

00:11:09.840 who told you at the beginning

00:11:11.120 of the pandemic

00:11:11.840 that leadership would not be a variable

00:11:14.660 that would be predictive.

00:11:17.980 Did anybody else tell you that?

00:11:20.200 I don't think one person told you

00:11:22.180 that you will not see

00:11:24.020 a leadership variable

00:11:25.040 that's obvious.

00:11:27.100 Now, there may be some extreme cases.

00:11:29.160 There may be some, I don't know,

00:11:30.860 third world country

00:11:31.800 that thought it was caused by AIDS

00:11:34.120 or something.

00:11:34.500 So yeah, in the extreme case, yes.

00:11:37.320 But I don't think you're going

00:11:38.240 to tell the difference

00:11:38.900 between Great Britain and France,

00:11:41.240 France and the United States.

00:11:43.280 I just don't think you're going

00:11:44.200 to be able to tell the difference

00:11:45.100 leadership-wise.

00:11:46.280 Some will do better than others,

00:11:47.480 but we still don't know why.

00:11:49.380 We just don't know why.

00:11:51.280 So I would say that Biden

00:11:53.840 has no chance,

00:11:55.580 even if he imagined

00:11:56.940 he was going to run for office.

00:11:58.060 I can't imagine he is.

00:11:59.640 But he couldn't possibly get elected

00:12:01.460 having failed at the number one thing

00:12:03.500 he said he'd do.

00:12:05.280 Number one thing Biden said he'd do

00:12:07.120 is get the pandemic under control.

00:12:09.400 Nothing like that happened.

00:12:11.320 350,000 people died under Biden

00:12:13.540 compared to 200,000, 220 or so

00:12:16.520 under Trump.

00:12:17.660 It's not even close.

00:12:19.840 And again,

00:12:21.040 Biden had the vaccinations.

00:12:23.060 Now, does that mean anything?

00:12:24.920 No.

00:12:25.320 It just, you know,

00:12:26.240 of course more people die

00:12:27.560 at the peak of the pandemic.

00:12:29.880 Of course they do.

00:12:31.840 It had nothing to do with Biden.

00:12:33.780 And if Trump had been president,

00:12:35.380 probably the same outcome.

00:12:37.160 Probably the same.

00:12:38.540 You could do a mental experiment

00:12:40.900 where you say,

00:12:41.560 hey, there are lots of conservatives

00:12:44.420 not getting the vaccine.

00:12:46.500 So maybe Trump could have convinced them,

00:12:49.680 whereas Biden could not.

00:12:52.440 I doubt it.

00:12:53.980 I doubt it.

00:12:55.100 This did seem to be the limit

00:12:56.800 of Trump's persuasion.

00:13:00.240 You know,

00:13:00.360 I think he's tremendous

00:13:01.260 at persuading,

00:13:02.080 as you know.

00:13:03.060 But I don't think he made a dent

00:13:04.840 in the conservatives

00:13:06.420 who were, you know,

00:13:08.360 concerned about the vaccination.

00:13:10.640 Let me give some comfort

00:13:12.560 to the vaccine deniers.

00:13:16.540 Because, you know,

00:13:17.820 any time that I'm accused of,

00:13:19.600 you know,

00:13:19.860 not being fair

00:13:21.420 about each side's perspective,

00:13:22.900 I like to correct that

00:13:24.660 when I can.

00:13:26.380 Here's what I hate

00:13:28.000 about the anti-vaxxers,

00:13:30.900 the skeptics about the vaccines.

00:13:33.180 I absolutely hate this.

00:13:36.600 That their reasons

00:13:38.140 are really good.

00:13:42.020 I hate that.

00:13:44.560 And of course,

00:13:46.280 the anti-vaxxers

00:13:47.100 will give you lots of,

00:13:48.380 you know, arguments.

00:13:49.200 But they have one argument

00:13:50.940 that I can't refute.

00:13:54.040 Do you know what it is?

00:13:55.500 What's the anti-vax argument

00:13:57.320 that I can't refute?

00:14:02.920 Which one is it?

00:14:03.960 No, no.

00:14:04.520 Natural immunity

00:14:05.220 is part of the story,

00:14:06.960 but that's not

00:14:07.920 what I'm talking about.

00:14:09.560 And no,

00:14:10.120 not inflammation,

00:14:11.820 not long-term effects.

00:14:13.440 Nope.

00:14:14.620 It's nothing about

00:14:15.660 your autonomy,

00:14:16.700 your personal choice.

00:14:17.680 Those are all good arguments,

00:14:18.840 by the way.

00:14:19.460 I'm saying that

00:14:20.100 that's not the good one.

00:14:22.220 The FDA,

00:14:23.600 Pfizer,

00:14:25.280 you know,

00:14:25.480 Big Pharma.

00:14:26.800 You have a lot of reasons,

00:14:27.840 don't you?

00:14:29.160 I would say

00:14:29.960 those are all

00:14:30.680 worth discussing.

00:14:32.340 Everything you're

00:14:33.080 mentioning here

00:14:33.680 is absolutely

00:14:34.420 on the list.

00:14:35.740 Should be part

00:14:36.340 of the conversation.

00:14:37.780 But the anti-vaxxers

00:14:39.320 have one argument

00:14:40.600 that I've got

00:14:42.280 nothing for.

00:14:44.160 And here it is.

00:14:46.160 Can't trust

00:14:46.880 the government.

00:14:47.400 That's a killer

00:14:50.820 argument.

00:14:52.060 Can't trust

00:14:52.640 the government.

00:14:55.780 What are you

00:14:56.300 going to say?

00:14:58.300 You tell me

00:14:59.040 you have an argument

00:14:59.800 against that.

00:15:02.220 Can't trust

00:15:02.800 the government.

00:15:03.920 Now,

00:15:04.360 you say to yourself,

00:15:04.940 wait a minute,

00:15:05.320 wait a minute,

00:15:05.600 it's not really

00:15:06.020 the government,

00:15:06.600 because they're

00:15:07.880 getting their data

00:15:08.560 from somebody else.

00:15:09.740 They're getting it

00:15:10.280 from Big Pharma.

00:15:11.860 Who trusts

00:15:14.000 Big Pharma?

00:15:15.980 They are,

00:15:16.940 by their nature,

00:15:17.680 something you can't

00:15:18.480 trust.

00:15:19.140 Doesn't mean they're

00:15:20.080 doing bad things

00:15:21.240 all the time.

00:15:22.640 I mean,

00:15:22.900 they have some

00:15:24.000 history of doing

00:15:24.780 some very bad

00:15:25.500 things.

00:15:26.940 But they're not,

00:15:28.280 you know,

00:15:28.640 it's not a criminal

00:15:29.620 organization or anything.

00:15:30.780 They're obviously

00:15:31.240 doing good things

00:15:32.080 as well.

00:15:35.260 I have to make

00:15:36.200 an aside here.

00:15:36.980 I'm sorry.

00:15:37.400 Everybody who's

00:15:40.660 calling Rob Reiner

00:15:41.580 a meathead,

00:15:43.040 I don't know

00:15:44.400 who needs to hear

00:15:45.140 this,

00:15:46.460 but it's not

00:15:47.440 additive.

00:15:49.700 It's not funny.

00:15:51.700 It's not something

00:15:52.540 we hadn't thought

00:15:53.220 of on our own.

00:15:54.980 You're just using

00:15:55.960 letters on a screen.

00:15:59.340 Nothing is

00:15:59.860 accomplished by

00:16:00.540 that statement

00:16:01.220 that Rob Reiner

00:16:02.520 is a meathead

00:16:03.400 or any version

00:16:04.920 of it that I saw

00:16:05.740 thousands of

00:16:06.420 yesterday.

00:16:06.820 Well,

00:16:07.560 you know he's

00:16:08.020 a meathead.

00:16:08.960 He's always

00:16:09.460 been a meathead,

00:16:10.680 but have I

00:16:11.400 mentioned that

00:16:12.100 he's a meathead?

00:16:13.900 I want to be

00:16:14.680 as clear as

00:16:15.320 this is possible.

00:16:16.700 It's not funny.

00:16:18.260 It's never been

00:16:19.040 funny,

00:16:19.720 and there's

00:16:20.100 nothing you can

00:16:20.740 do to it

00:16:21.340 that will make

00:16:21.980 that a good

00:16:22.440 comment.

00:16:23.960 Right?

00:16:26.040 Now,

00:16:26.580 if you were

00:16:27.060 the only one

00:16:27.720 who thought of

00:16:28.300 it,

00:16:29.440 I'd say,

00:16:30.020 oh,

00:16:30.260 that's a good

00:16:30.940 point.

00:16:31.320 Nobody came

00:16:32.000 to this

00:16:32.340 conclusion that

00:16:33.540 he had a

00:16:33.900 character he

00:16:34.460 played famously

00:16:35.200 called a

00:16:35.640 meathead.

00:16:35.960 If you were

00:16:36.940 the only

00:16:37.440 one,

00:16:39.260 oh,

00:16:39.560 okay,

00:16:39.860 that might

00:16:40.160 be additive.

00:16:41.660 But you

00:16:42.240 do know

00:16:42.700 everybody's

00:16:43.460 saying it,

00:16:43.920 right?

00:16:44.760 Like hundreds

00:16:45.480 and hundreds

00:16:45.980 of people

00:16:46.380 are saying,

00:16:47.160 you know,

00:16:47.580 he's a

00:16:47.820 meathead.

00:16:48.160 I'm just

00:16:49.380 saying,

00:16:49.720 please,

00:16:50.160 please,

00:16:51.960 please,

00:16:52.720 can you

00:16:53.260 help me

00:16:53.580 stop reading

00:16:54.100 that comment?

00:16:55.700 You know,

00:16:56.200 you have a

00:16:56.540 right to

00:16:56.840 make it,

00:16:57.160 of course.

00:16:58.240 I'm just

00:16:58.640 saying that

00:16:59.120 it wears

00:16:59.680 on me

00:17:00.120 like few

00:17:00.860 things do.

00:17:02.980 I don't

00:17:03.600 want to hear

00:17:03.980 Soylent Green,

00:17:05.060 I don't want

00:17:05.620 to hear

00:17:05.820 what's like

00:17:06.320 the Matrix,

00:17:07.580 and I

00:17:08.980 don't want

00:17:09.320 to hear

00:17:09.620 that Rob

00:17:10.320 Reiner's

00:17:10.680 a meathead,

00:17:11.520 because those

00:17:12.060 are the most

00:17:12.460 obvious things

00:17:13.200 that anybody

00:17:13.640 could say

00:17:14.040 about anything.

00:17:14.860 So I was

00:17:17.780 saying about,

00:17:18.760 yeah,

00:17:19.280 Biden's done

00:17:19.880 a bad job

00:17:20.360 here,

00:17:20.940 but leadership

00:17:22.480 is not

00:17:22.900 predictive.

00:17:23.900 Now,

00:17:24.200 apparently the

00:17:24.800 United States

00:17:25.360 has warned

00:17:25.940 Russia that 0.93

00:17:27.800 if they're

00:17:28.280 behind the,

00:17:29.260 I'm changing

00:17:29.880 the topic

00:17:30.280 here,

00:17:30.900 if Russia

00:17:31.400 is behind

00:17:31.900 this so-called

00:17:32.720 Havana

00:17:34.600 Syndrome

00:17:35.140 sonic weapon,

00:17:37.620 that they

00:17:39.780 would pay

00:17:40.120 for that.

00:17:41.420 Apparently

00:17:41.820 there are a

00:17:42.220 number of

00:17:42.640 Havana

00:17:43.060 Syndrome

00:17:43.520 cases,

00:17:44.860 happening

00:17:45.300 related to

00:17:46.800 Russian

00:17:47.220 embassies

00:17:47.740 and others,

00:17:48.340 et cetera.

00:17:48.980 So now I

00:17:49.520 think there

00:17:49.780 are hundreds

00:17:50.140 of cases

00:17:50.620 of this.

00:17:51.960 What was

00:17:52.400 my prediction

00:17:53.020 on day

00:17:53.480 one?

00:17:55.080 You will

00:17:55.580 never find

00:17:56.360 a secret

00:17:57.180 sonic weapon

00:17:58.940 that's behind

00:18:00.220 it all.

00:18:01.060 Now,

00:18:01.340 there might

00:18:01.600 be something

00:18:02.060 that's behind

00:18:02.620 it all.

00:18:03.320 It might

00:18:03.540 be some

00:18:03.860 kind of

00:18:04.380 electronics

00:18:05.880 that are

00:18:06.560 common to

00:18:07.440 embassies

00:18:10.180 that have

00:18:11.000 some sonic

00:18:11.620 problem to

00:18:12.200 them or

00:18:12.440 something.

00:18:12.680 But I

00:18:14.680 think I'm

00:18:15.080 also the

00:18:15.620 only person

00:18:16.100 in the

00:18:16.340 country who

00:18:16.800 predicted

00:18:17.120 that,

00:18:17.540 am I

00:18:17.720 right?

00:18:19.400 I didn't

00:18:20.020 hear anybody

00:18:20.560 else in

00:18:20.980 the country

00:18:21.400 predict that

00:18:22.820 you would

00:18:23.060 never find

00:18:23.620 the sonic

00:18:24.040 weapon.

00:18:26.120 Haven't

00:18:26.680 found it

00:18:27.000 yet.

00:18:28.300 So I

00:18:29.100 like to

00:18:29.420 talk about

00:18:29.840 my predictions

00:18:31.360 that no

00:18:32.060 one has

00:18:32.440 made.

00:18:33.560 All right.

00:18:34.980 I have to

00:18:35.960 talk about

00:18:36.360 this again

00:18:36.900 because it

00:18:37.720 came on

00:18:38.180 the slow

00:18:38.660 news

00:18:39.060 Thanksgiving

00:18:40.340 Day,

00:18:41.040 but there

00:18:41.700 is a

00:18:42.120 new study

00:18:42.620 saying that

00:18:43.180 the Arctic

00:18:43.600 Ocean began

00:18:44.300 warming decades

00:18:45.420 earlier than

00:18:46.060 previously

00:18:46.580 thought.

00:18:48.220 Now,

00:18:48.660 to be

00:18:48.960 clear,

00:18:50.360 this new

00:18:50.840 information

00:18:51.300 does not

00:18:51.940 debunk

00:18:52.500 climate change

00:18:54.440 in the sense

00:18:55.060 of its

00:18:55.480 direction,

00:18:56.560 and it

00:18:57.180 doesn't

00:18:57.520 debunk it

00:18:58.080 in terms

00:18:58.580 of humans

00:18:59.680 causing it.

00:19:01.240 It does,

00:19:02.260 however,

00:19:02.980 completely

00:19:03.420 debunk

00:19:03.940 the science.

00:19:05.220 So the

00:19:08.080 reality might

00:19:08.880 be that

00:19:09.800 the Earth

00:19:10.120 is warming,

00:19:10.860 people are

00:19:11.300 causing it,

00:19:12.400 maybe we

00:19:12.860 need to do

00:19:13.260 something about

00:19:13.800 it.

00:19:14.940 That seems

00:19:15.800 to be the

00:19:16.180 case.

00:19:16.880 My current

00:19:17.600 best guess,

00:19:20.120 because I'm

00:19:20.500 not a

00:19:20.820 scientist,

00:19:21.900 is that

00:19:22.380 probably humans

00:19:23.400 are warming,

00:19:24.020 because I

00:19:24.300 think that's

00:19:24.720 something you

00:19:25.200 could study.

00:19:26.460 I think you

00:19:26.920 could do it

00:19:27.300 in a lab,

00:19:27.960 you could

00:19:28.200 study it a

00:19:28.780 million times,

00:19:29.500 and you

00:19:29.620 could find

00:19:29.980 out that

00:19:31.080 CO2 has

00:19:31.860 that effect.

00:19:33.260 Seems

00:19:33.580 reasonable.

00:19:33.940 Which is

00:19:35.180 different from

00:19:35.680 saying that

00:19:36.080 the science

00:19:36.500 is right,

00:19:37.600 because there's

00:19:38.160 a lot of

00:19:38.560 science,

00:19:39.520 but just

00:19:39.860 that one

00:19:40.240 minor thing,

00:19:40.900 whether CO2

00:19:41.540 makes warming

00:19:42.200 or not,

00:19:43.060 I think they

00:19:43.640 got that

00:19:44.060 right.

00:19:45.220 We don't

00:19:45.700 know how

00:19:46.020 fast,

00:19:46.560 how much,

00:19:47.080 how much

00:19:47.860 has been

00:19:48.140 in the

00:19:48.360 past,

00:19:48.900 how much

00:19:49.240 we have

00:19:49.500 to worry

00:19:49.820 about it,

00:19:50.140 those are

00:19:50.380 all different

00:19:50.700 questions.

00:19:52.120 But this

00:19:52.860 new study,

00:19:53.840 if it

00:19:54.180 stands,

00:19:55.720 and it

00:19:55.980 might not,

00:19:56.780 maybe it

00:19:57.340 gets debunked

00:19:57.940 tomorrow,

00:19:58.640 but if it

00:19:59.220 were to

00:19:59.560 stand,

00:20:01.180 would show

00:20:01.800 that all

00:20:02.220 the models

00:20:02.780 are completely

00:20:03.520 wrong.

00:20:03.940 sort of a

00:20:07.200 big deal.

00:20:08.780 There's no

00:20:09.460 way the

00:20:09.760 models could

00:20:10.280 even be

00:20:10.760 close to

00:20:11.540 correct,

00:20:12.320 if this

00:20:12.760 study is

00:20:13.260 right,

00:20:14.060 because it

00:20:14.540 said the

00:20:14.860 warming

00:20:15.100 started way

00:20:15.800 before the

00:20:17.020 largest amount

00:20:18.280 of industrial

00:20:18.900 stuff happened

00:20:20.120 by people.

00:20:23.280 Humans put

00:20:24.060 off heat?

00:20:24.560 Well,

00:20:25.020 maybe.

00:20:25.320 Maybe.

00:20:27.980 You mean the

00:20:28.820 human causation

00:20:29.680 part?

00:20:30.060 I don't

00:20:32.560 know what

00:20:32.840 you're

00:20:33.000 debunking

00:20:33.460 there.

00:20:34.260 But let

00:20:34.740 me go

00:20:35.260 on.

00:20:36.420 So it

00:20:39.240 puts the

00:20:40.240 believers in

00:20:41.740 climate science

00:20:42.360 in a kind

00:20:43.020 of a bind,

00:20:43.920 because if

00:20:44.740 the study is

00:20:45.460 right, it

00:20:46.020 means that

00:20:46.340 everything that

00:20:46.860 they thought

00:20:47.200 about climate

00:20:47.740 change, at

00:20:49.000 least the

00:20:49.940 modeling part

00:20:50.740 of it, just

00:20:51.160 the modeling

00:20:51.600 part, was

00:20:52.560 wrong.

00:20:52.880 But if

00:20:57.320 it's not

00:20:57.780 true, that

00:20:59.480 means climate

00:21:00.020 science is

00:21:00.480 not true,

00:21:01.300 because this

00:21:02.780 is also done

00:21:03.440 by science,

00:21:04.200 right?

00:21:04.980 So if it

00:21:05.400 turns out that

00:21:05.940 this science

00:21:06.740 is wrong,

00:21:07.500 what other

00:21:07.940 science is

00:21:08.500 wrong?

00:21:09.320 So you

00:21:09.660 can either

00:21:10.060 doubt the

00:21:11.320 models, or

00:21:12.240 you can doubt

00:21:12.780 climate science

00:21:14.480 itself.

00:21:15.420 It's a real

00:21:15.980 problem, and I

00:21:17.300 don't hear anybody

00:21:17.780 else talking

00:21:18.260 about it, do

00:21:18.700 you?

00:21:19.900 Have you

00:21:20.260 heard anybody

00:21:20.740 else talking

00:21:21.260 about this

00:21:21.680 study and

00:21:22.200 what it

00:21:22.480 does to

00:21:22.860 the entire

00:21:23.380 body of

00:21:24.140 climate science

00:21:26.020 modeling?

00:21:27.080 Yeah, I

00:21:27.520 think it's

00:21:27.820 just going to

00:21:28.220 disappear as

00:21:28.960 a topic.

00:21:30.660 All right,

00:21:31.340 here's my

00:21:31.820 provocative

00:21:32.320 thought of

00:21:33.100 the day.

00:21:33.440 Apparently,

00:21:35.020 we're hearing

00:21:35.540 reports,

00:21:36.260 especially from

00:21:36.860 the UK, but

00:21:37.600 I think it

00:21:37.960 would be true

00:21:38.380 in America,

00:21:39.560 that there's

00:21:40.200 just this

00:21:40.660 huge problem

00:21:41.600 of sexual

00:21:42.200 abuse of

00:21:43.220 women in 0.62

00:21:43.820 the military.

00:21:45.400 Now, not

00:21:46.680 going to make

00:21:47.220 light of that,

00:21:48.200 nobody should,

00:21:50.160 but I am

00:21:52.740 very bothered

00:21:53.480 by not

00:21:55.100 just the

00:21:55.500 fact that

00:21:55.940 it's a

00:21:56.620 brutal crime,

00:21:58.820 so I'm

00:21:59.400 not just

00:21:59.920 bothered by

00:22:00.520 that.

00:22:02.200 I'm

00:22:02.660 bothered by

00:22:03.420 the fact

00:22:03.820 that, correct

00:22:04.680 me if I'm

00:22:05.100 wrong, but

00:22:05.500 the women in

00:22:06.500 the military are

00:22:07.300 trained to

00:22:08.100 kill, are

00:22:08.540 they not?

00:22:09.900 They don't

00:22:10.540 separate the

00:22:11.400 women and 0.99

00:22:11.820 say, oh,

00:22:12.360 you can learn

00:22:13.680 to cook.

00:22:15.440 Isn't

00:22:15.880 everybody in

00:22:16.480 the military

00:22:16.860 trained to

00:22:17.380 kill?

00:22:17.580 Am I wrong

00:22:19.780 about that?

00:22:20.180 Is there

00:22:21.140 any exception

00:22:21.680 to that?

00:22:23.220 I think they

00:22:23.760 all use

00:22:24.600 firearms, they're

00:22:25.400 all trained in

00:22:25.980 it, I mean

00:22:27.280 at different

00:22:27.620 levels, right?

00:22:28.640 Marines are

00:22:29.260 trained to

00:22:30.000 kill really

00:22:30.840 hard, but

00:22:32.340 everybody's

00:22:32.820 trained to

00:22:33.160 kill, or

00:22:34.880 at least

00:22:35.160 defend

00:22:35.500 themselves, am

00:22:36.680 I right?

00:22:38.120 So, here's

00:22:39.080 my problem, if

00:22:39.820 you put somebody

00:22:40.400 in the military

00:22:40.900 or they join

00:22:41.520 the military,

00:22:42.380 you train

00:22:43.060 them to

00:22:43.500 kill people

00:22:44.040 who deserve

00:22:44.620 to be killed, 0.80

00:22:45.380 I think they

00:22:47.580 should have

00:22:47.920 special dispensation

00:22:49.120 to be able to

00:22:49.700 kill their

00:22:50.200 sexual accusers,

00:22:52.520 or abusers,

00:22:53.320 not accusers.

00:22:54.880 I think a

00:22:55.680 woman in the

00:22:56.180 military should

00:22:56.800 be able to

00:22:57.200 hunt down and

00:22:58.780 murder a

00:23:00.520 sexual abuser,

00:23:01.500 even if it's

00:23:02.140 next week or

00:23:02.800 next year.

00:23:05.080 Now, in a

00:23:06.280 practical sense,

00:23:07.120 you can never

00:23:07.540 have that law,

00:23:08.280 right?

00:23:08.760 I'm aware of

00:23:09.540 that.

00:23:10.560 But I feel

00:23:13.200 like it would

00:23:13.620 be justice.

00:23:14.260 If we're

00:23:15.580 going to

00:23:15.800 train people

00:23:16.420 to kill,

00:23:17.800 and we're

00:23:18.240 training to

00:23:18.780 kill people

00:23:19.340 who deserve

00:23:19.820 to be killed, 0.80

00:23:21.040 and they

00:23:21.620 meet one of

00:23:22.100 these people

00:23:22.540 who deserves

00:23:23.060 to be killed

00:23:23.660 right up

00:23:24.120 close, I

00:23:25.560 say they

00:23:25.920 can kill

00:23:26.300 them in

00:23:26.580 their sleep.

00:23:27.940 I'm okay

00:23:28.380 with that.

00:23:30.340 Don't train

00:23:31.040 people to

00:23:31.520 kill and

00:23:32.320 then rape 1.00

00:23:33.060 them, and

00:23:34.040 don't expect

00:23:34.580 them to kill

00:23:35.080 the person

00:23:35.480 who raped 0.97

00:23:35.920 them.

00:23:36.700 That's not

00:23:37.220 fair.

00:23:38.500 Either don't

00:23:39.080 train them

00:23:39.460 to kill,

00:23:41.040 or let

00:23:42.000 them kill.

00:23:43.440 Because

00:23:43.920 some people

00:23:44.540 are worth

00:23:44.920 killing.

00:23:50.240 All right.

00:23:51.780 That's not

00:23:52.420 a serious

00:23:53.040 point, but

00:23:54.280 it could

00:23:57.060 be.

00:23:59.140 Lauren

00:23:59.620 Bobert,

00:24:01.040 is it

00:24:01.520 Bobert or

00:24:02.640 Bobbert?

00:24:04.120 She's got a 0.79

00:24:04.860 Bert at the

00:24:05.360 end of her

00:24:05.640 name, so

00:24:06.040 I'm

00:24:06.180 automatically,

00:24:07.060 I like her

00:24:08.060 because of

00:24:08.640 Dilbert,

00:24:09.320 Dogbert,

00:24:10.060 Bobert.

00:24:10.500 Anyway, so

00:24:12.660 she's on

00:24:14.180 film telling

00:24:14.860 an Ilan

00:24:15.580 Omar story

00:24:16.380 that Ilan

00:24:16.900 Omar says

00:24:17.580 never happened,

00:24:18.320 but the

00:24:19.300 story, as

00:24:20.040 Lauren says,

00:24:21.040 is that

00:24:21.440 Ilan Omar,

00:24:22.740 who, as you

00:24:23.580 know, would

00:24:24.160 be in

00:24:24.420 traditional

00:24:24.860 Islamic garb,

00:24:27.940 according to

00:24:28.940 this story,

00:24:29.480 which Omar

00:24:30.080 says never

00:24:30.660 happened,

00:24:31.540 Omar was 1.00

00:24:32.020 getting in

00:24:32.360 an elevator,

00:24:33.340 and Lauren

00:24:33.800 Bobert saw

00:24:34.520 the security,

00:24:36.520 all worried

00:24:37.140 about a threat,

00:24:37.880 and running

00:24:38.200 toward the

00:24:38.600 elevator,

00:24:39.740 and didn't

00:24:40.360 get there

00:24:40.680 in time,

00:24:41.840 and then

00:24:42.160 Bobert

00:24:42.560 allegedly said,

00:24:43.640 but we

00:24:44.020 think maybe

00:24:44.480 it didn't

00:24:44.760 really happen,

00:24:45.840 that she

00:24:46.100 said,

00:24:46.460 don't worry,

00:24:47.520 she doesn't

00:24:48.860 have a

00:24:49.180 backpack,

00:24:50.400 meaning that

00:24:51.120 she's not

00:24:51.540 an Islamic

00:24:53.360 terrorist

00:24:54.060 bomber.

00:24:55.680 And people

00:24:56.400 are saying

00:24:56.860 this is

00:24:57.260 horrible,

00:24:57.800 horrible,

00:24:58.140 horrible,

00:24:58.880 and I

00:25:00.720 would agree

00:25:01.180 that it

00:25:01.760 was probably

00:25:02.160 dumb for

00:25:02.620 her to 0.94

00:25:02.820 tell this

00:25:03.180 joke,

00:25:03.660 so I'm

00:25:03.980 not going

00:25:04.240 to defend

00:25:04.640 the joke,

00:25:05.180 but I

00:25:05.420 would just

00:25:05.940 put this

00:25:06.320 one little

00:25:06.820 question to

00:25:08.140 it.

00:25:08.600 was it

00:25:10.940 a joke

00:25:12.580 about

00:25:13.780 Ilhan

00:25:14.280 Omar,

00:25:15.580 or was

00:25:16.440 it a joke

00:25:16.820 about the

00:25:17.240 security

00:25:17.600 guard?

00:25:21.340 I'm not

00:25:22.080 so sure,

00:25:23.160 right?

00:25:24.760 Because the

00:25:25.940 joke was

00:25:26.980 sort of

00:25:27.380 about the

00:25:27.980 security

00:25:28.440 guard

00:25:28.940 being a

00:25:31.700 bigot and

00:25:32.200 imagining that

00:25:32.860 she was a

00:25:33.260 terrorist.

00:25:34.000 It wasn't

00:25:34.760 about Lauren

00:25:35.340 Bober

00:25:35.740 imagining she

00:25:36.580 was a

00:25:36.860 terrorist,

00:25:37.300 and her

00:25:37.620 joke,

00:25:37.940 she didn't

00:25:38.480 have a

00:25:38.740 backpack,

00:25:39.260 so you're

00:25:39.500 okay.

00:25:40.500 It doesn't

00:25:40.860 sound like

00:25:41.260 she believed

00:25:41.860 that she

00:25:42.160 was a

00:25:42.480 terrorist.

00:25:42.820 Obviously,

00:25:43.300 she doesn't.

00:25:46.160 It's kind

00:25:46.720 of one of

00:25:47.000 these weird

00:25:47.360 ones.

00:25:48.620 If somebody

00:25:49.320 says a

00:25:49.720 joke at

00:25:50.180 the expense

00:25:50.720 of the

00:25:51.180 person,

00:25:53.280 like Omar,

00:25:54.700 well, that

00:25:55.280 would feel a

00:25:55.780 little racist,

00:25:56.480 depending on

00:25:56.900 the joke,

00:25:57.320 of course.

00:25:59.280 But if the

00:25:59.980 joke is

00:26:00.400 about how

00:26:03.040 someone else

00:26:03.740 was racist

00:26:04.360 against them,

00:26:05.200 I'm not

00:26:06.320 sure I'd

00:26:06.640 take that

00:26:07.000 the same.

00:26:11.360 Somebody's

00:26:11.800 saying on

00:26:12.200 Locals,

00:26:15.000 oh, F,

00:26:15.700 just put that

00:26:16.300 scalpel down.

00:26:17.080 Am I

00:26:17.300 cutting it

00:26:17.680 too finely?

00:26:20.480 Well, it's

00:26:21.000 my job.

00:26:21.940 Jokes are

00:26:22.400 my job.

00:26:23.580 I do look

00:26:24.000 at them

00:26:24.320 kind of

00:26:25.140 analytically.

00:26:26.720 All right,

00:26:27.060 I have an

00:26:27.500 algorithm for

00:26:28.340 you, and I

00:26:28.820 know this

00:26:29.100 will be

00:26:29.280 helpful,

00:26:29.540 a way to

00:26:30.660 determine

00:26:31.040 which graphs

00:26:32.400 you see

00:26:32.900 on Twitter

00:26:33.820 about

00:26:34.900 ivermectin

00:26:35.820 solving a

00:26:37.760 country's

00:26:38.180 problem to

00:26:40.240 tell which

00:26:40.620 one of

00:26:40.920 them are

00:26:41.240 true.

00:26:41.580 Because we've

00:26:41.920 seen the

00:26:42.380 graph, I've

00:26:44.220 seen a graph

00:26:44.700 that said as

00:26:45.600 soon as

00:26:45.940 ivermectin was

00:26:46.720 introduced,

00:26:48.040 COVID in

00:26:48.560 Japan went 0.76

00:26:49.360 to nothing.

00:26:50.940 And some

00:26:51.520 other places,

00:26:52.360 as soon as

00:26:52.920 ivermectin was

00:26:53.840 introduced,

00:26:55.240 went to

00:26:55.660 nothing.

00:26:57.580 Do you know

00:26:58.180 how to tell

00:26:58.620 which of those

00:26:59.180 stories?

00:26:59.540 are fake

00:27:00.920 and which

00:27:01.420 are not?

00:27:04.560 The answer

00:27:05.300 is all of

00:27:05.820 them are

00:27:06.080 fake.

00:27:06.760 Every one

00:27:07.520 of the

00:27:07.820 country graphs

00:27:08.980 that says

00:27:09.820 ivermectin

00:27:10.440 was introduced,

00:27:11.580 it doesn't

00:27:11.920 matter if

00:27:12.240 it's India,

00:27:13.680 they're all

00:27:14.200 fake.

00:27:14.980 They've all

00:27:15.440 been debunked.

00:27:16.700 Now,

00:27:18.740 did you

00:27:19.480 just hear me

00:27:20.020 say that I

00:27:20.580 debunked the

00:27:21.340 effectiveness of

00:27:22.420 ivermectin?

00:27:23.660 Did I say

00:27:24.160 that?

00:27:24.920 Did I just

00:27:25.460 tell you that

00:27:26.040 ivermectin

00:27:26.560 doesn't work?

00:27:27.840 No.

00:27:28.180 No, I told

00:27:29.280 you that

00:27:29.640 the graphs

00:27:30.320 that show

00:27:31.560 it cured

00:27:32.260 some country

00:27:33.100 are all

00:27:33.760 fake,

00:27:34.300 100% of

00:27:35.000 them.

00:27:36.240 I've seen

00:27:36.680 every one,

00:27:37.220 I've seen

00:27:37.520 every one

00:27:37.900 debunked.

00:27:38.820 I doubt

00:27:39.340 you'll see

00:27:39.760 a real one.

00:27:41.360 Now,

00:27:42.120 does that

00:27:43.100 tell you

00:27:43.460 anything

00:27:43.820 about the

00:27:45.380 effectiveness

00:27:45.840 of ivermectin?

00:27:48.500 Maybe.

00:27:49.760 Maybe not.

00:27:51.080 There is one

00:27:51.580 view that says

00:27:52.300 that the

00:27:53.220 pharma companies

00:27:54.020 are so strong

00:27:54.920 they could

00:27:55.860 make every

00:27:56.460 single country

00:27:57.320 bow to

00:27:58.260 their will.

00:27:59.860 Or,

00:28:00.440 at the very

00:28:00.880 least,

00:28:01.880 get the

00:28:02.660 big countries'

00:28:04.400 medical communities

00:28:05.400 to bow to

00:28:06.120 their will.

00:28:07.140 And then the

00:28:07.500 smaller countries

00:28:08.320 would say,

00:28:09.240 oh,

00:28:09.700 crap,

00:28:10.060 the United

00:28:10.400 States says

00:28:11.000 this doesn't

00:28:11.480 work.

00:28:12.700 What are you

00:28:13.060 going to do?

00:28:14.320 Because we can't

00:28:15.320 test it ourselves,

00:28:16.200 we don't have a

00:28:16.680 good medical

00:28:17.780 industry.

00:28:18.880 But the

00:28:19.780 United States

00:28:20.340 says it works,

00:28:21.160 and the UK

00:28:21.640 says it works,

00:28:22.460 and they've got

00:28:22.920 good medical

00:28:23.440 staffs.

00:28:25.080 So,

00:28:25.820 so there is

00:28:27.360 one that says

00:28:28.060 that ivermectin

00:28:28.860 might be working,

00:28:30.380 and yet every

00:28:31.800 single country

00:28:32.540 is afraid to

00:28:33.220 use it.

00:28:33.640 Is that

00:28:33.880 possible?

00:28:36.700 Maybe.

00:28:38.360 Maybe.

00:28:40.100 Who debunked

00:28:40.980 it?

00:28:41.400 Everybody.

00:28:42.280 You just have

00:28:42.780 to look at

00:28:43.120 the original

00:28:43.540 data.

00:28:45.020 In other

00:28:45.320 words,

00:28:45.680 you just look

00:28:46.360 at any

00:28:46.700 original data

00:28:47.360 and it

00:28:47.620 disappears.

00:28:48.340 There's no

00:28:48.860 data that

00:28:49.380 suggests that

00:28:50.240 ivermectin

00:28:50.740 solved any

00:28:51.280 problem.

00:28:52.500 You can't

00:28:52.980 find any

00:28:53.440 original data

00:28:54.020 that says

00:28:54.400 that.

00:28:56.100 So,

00:28:58.060 all right,

00:29:01.220 here's my

00:29:02.460 take.

00:29:03.480 The longer

00:29:04.300 we go

00:29:04.980 with the

00:29:06.840 belief that's

00:29:08.320 widespread that

00:29:09.060 ivermectin

00:29:09.680 does or

00:29:10.140 might work,

00:29:11.100 the longer

00:29:11.680 we go

00:29:12.280 where no

00:29:13.660 country actually

00:29:14.620 solves its

00:29:15.280 problem with

00:29:15.800 ivermectin,

00:29:17.440 it's very

00:29:18.120 much less

00:29:18.840 likely it

00:29:19.400 works.

00:29:20.580 Because even

00:29:21.540 if you

00:29:22.300 believe all

00:29:22.960 the medical

00:29:23.440 experts in

00:29:24.520 every country

00:29:25.300 were influenced

00:29:26.900 by, let's

00:29:27.400 say, the

00:29:27.700 United States

00:29:28.340 or influenced

00:29:28.900 by pharma,

00:29:29.940 which seems

00:29:30.540 unlikely to

00:29:31.720 me, you'd

00:29:32.860 have to think

00:29:33.440 with all the

00:29:34.160 countries in

00:29:34.700 the world and

00:29:35.380 the desperation,

00:29:36.960 somebody would

00:29:38.360 have actually

00:29:39.200 solved their

00:29:40.040 entire country's

00:29:40.940 problem with

00:29:41.500 ivermectin if

00:29:42.660 it worked.

00:29:44.220 Am I wrong?

00:29:45.080 You don't

00:29:46.320 think that

00:29:46.720 one country

00:29:47.400 somewhere would

00:29:48.240 have totally

00:29:49.080 solved their

00:29:49.640 pandemic?

00:29:51.200 Or how

00:29:51.700 about this?

00:29:52.860 If ivermectin

00:29:53.820 worked as

00:29:54.340 well as the

00:29:55.380 anecdotal

00:29:55.920 reports, you

00:29:57.580 don't think

00:29:57.980 that a

00:29:58.280 hospital would 0.56

00:29:58.880 have noticed

00:29:59.340 by now?

00:30:00.780 A hospital?

00:30:01.780 A hospital

00:30:02.240 that does

00:30:02.640 nothing but

00:30:03.120 COVID patients?

00:30:04.360 They wouldn't

00:30:04.800 have obviously

00:30:05.620 noticed that.

00:30:06.760 Because you

00:30:07.220 know what they

00:30:07.500 do obviously

00:30:08.120 notice?

00:30:09.820 Regeneron.

00:30:10.420 I'll bet you

00:30:12.260 could go to

00:30:12.760 any hospital

00:30:13.660 that does a

00:30:14.180 lot of COVID

00:30:14.680 and say,

00:30:16.020 have you

00:30:16.260 noticed on

00:30:17.280 your own

00:30:17.780 that Regeneron

00:30:19.260 is bringing

00:30:20.000 people back

00:30:20.560 to life who

00:30:21.180 maybe seem

00:30:22.100 like they've

00:30:22.480 gone too

00:30:22.800 far?

00:30:23.560 I would bet

00:30:24.140 100% of

00:30:25.020 hospitals would 0.99

00:30:25.600 say, oh

00:30:25.880 yeah, we

00:30:26.100 see it every

00:30:26.500 day.

00:30:27.240 We give

00:30:27.600 them Regeneron,

00:30:28.420 it totally

00:30:29.120 turns them

00:30:29.540 around.

00:30:31.200 They would

00:30:31.760 see the same

00:30:32.300 thing with

00:30:32.680 ivermectin.

00:30:34.440 I mean, maybe

00:30:35.140 not US because

00:30:36.100 it's sort of

00:30:36.760 semi-banned

00:30:37.580 here, but

00:30:38.520 somebody would

00:30:39.140 see it.

00:30:40.420 You don't

00:30:40.640 think any

00:30:41.180 hospital, any

00:30:42.600 country, would

00:30:43.460 have seen the

00:30:43.900 effect yet.

00:30:46.680 So go back

00:30:47.760 to my

00:30:48.360 hydroxychloroquine

00:30:49.920 predictions early

00:30:51.540 on in the

00:30:51.960 pandemic.

00:30:53.460 Like ivermectin,

00:30:54.740 it looked like

00:30:55.280 it was anecdotally

00:30:57.020 and there were

00:30:57.700 studies that

00:30:58.260 suggested it

00:30:58.840 worked.

00:31:00.860 I said that

00:31:02.740 every month

00:31:03.420 that goes by

00:31:04.200 where you don't

00:31:05.380 have proof that

00:31:06.100 it works, you

00:31:07.340 have to lower

00:31:07.940 your odds that

00:31:08.580 it worked.

00:31:09.000 And then you

00:31:10.280 saw every month

00:31:11.060 I would lower

00:31:11.500 the odds of

00:31:12.480 hydroxychloroquine

00:31:13.520 working.

00:31:14.340 It was down to

00:31:14.980 30%.

00:31:15.660 The last number

00:31:16.480 was 10%.

00:31:17.400 I think I'd

00:31:18.320 drop it to

00:31:18.800 2% now.

00:31:21.900 We've gone so

00:31:22.820 long that if

00:31:24.320 hydroxychloroquine

00:31:25.220 worked, we would

00:31:27.100 fucking know it. 0.83

00:31:28.740 I don't think

00:31:29.600 there's any

00:31:30.440 chance, any

00:31:32.060 chance, we

00:31:32.880 wouldn't clearly

00:31:33.620 know it by now.

00:31:34.480 Ivermectin

00:31:36.080 is the same

00:31:36.520 path.

00:31:37.960 Can I tell

00:31:38.460 you ivermectin

00:31:39.780 doesn't work?

00:31:40.600 Absolutely not.

00:31:42.160 So you're not

00:31:42.920 hearing me say

00:31:43.480 that.

00:31:44.600 But I will

00:31:45.300 say that every

00:31:45.980 day that goes

00:31:46.580 by you have

00:31:47.240 to lower your

00:31:47.740 estimate if

00:31:49.020 you're being

00:31:49.360 wise about

00:31:49.980 this.

00:31:50.760 Because you

00:31:51.380 would see the

00:31:52.080 signal somewhere

00:31:54.220 or somebody

00:31:55.260 would see it.

00:31:56.160 But you don't

00:31:56.720 see anybody in

00:31:57.720 an official role

00:31:58.520 who sees it.

00:32:00.680 Right?

00:32:01.160 You see a

00:32:01.740 rogue doctor,

00:32:02.440 but do you

00:32:03.320 see anybody

00:32:03.740 who runs

00:32:04.180 an ICU?

00:32:07.820 Have you seen

00:32:08.340 any ICU

00:32:09.020 doctors say,

00:32:10.000 oh yeah,

00:32:10.940 we're giving

00:32:11.400 people ivermectin

00:32:12.300 and it's just

00:32:12.620 taking them

00:32:13.000 right off the

00:32:13.420 ventilator?

00:32:14.660 Nope.

00:32:15.760 Nope.

00:32:16.860 So, does

00:32:17.740 ivermectin

00:32:18.340 work?

00:32:18.760 I have no

00:32:19.240 idea.

00:32:20.240 But I can

00:32:21.420 tell you that

00:32:21.980 the longer you

00:32:22.560 go, the less

00:32:23.220 likely it is.

00:32:24.780 CNN has

00:32:25.460 some...

00:32:26.180 Oh no, let's

00:32:26.660 talk about that

00:32:27.120 next.

00:32:27.960 So apparently

00:32:28.540 the Lincoln

00:32:29.100 Project

00:32:29.720 they are

00:32:33.160 a scrappy

00:32:34.220 bunch of

00:32:34.760 losers, the

00:32:36.160 Lincoln Project.

00:32:37.420 So Rick

00:32:37.840 Wilson especially,

00:32:38.920 I guess, he's

00:32:40.060 trying to revive

00:32:40.840 this monstrosity

00:32:41.900 that's been

00:32:42.880 completely

00:32:43.680 humiliated in

00:32:46.240 the last year

00:32:46.760 or so.

00:32:47.600 And they're

00:32:49.160 trying to make

00:32:50.080 it a thing to

00:32:50.840 get Trump to

00:32:51.460 be the nominee.

00:32:53.000 So they want

00:32:53.620 Trump to be

00:32:54.080 the nominee,

00:32:54.780 even though he's

00:32:55.280 the target of

00:32:55.940 all their

00:32:56.280 attacks, because

00:32:57.820 once he loses,

00:32:59.720 then it will

00:33:01.920 destroy what's

00:33:02.700 left of

00:33:03.160 Trumpism, and

00:33:03.880 that's their

00:33:04.280 real goal.

00:33:05.780 And so this is

00:33:06.480 what Rick

00:33:06.880 Wilson said

00:33:07.480 about that

00:33:08.880 strategy.

00:33:09.560 He says,

00:33:09.880 the people who

00:33:10.960 think we want

00:33:11.620 Trump back in

00:33:12.400 2024 for any

00:33:14.440 reason other

00:33:15.440 than killing

00:33:16.040 off his vile

00:33:17.040 repugnant cult

00:33:18.180 and driving it

00:33:19.400 into the dustbin

00:33:20.300 of history,

00:33:21.360 display the

00:33:21.960 same failure of

00:33:22.880 imagination they

00:33:23.820 always have.

00:33:26.800 Do you think

00:33:27.420 that's why Rick

00:33:28.080 Wilson is

00:33:28.600 reviving the

00:33:30.020 Lincoln Project

00:33:30.680 which made

00:33:31.280 them all

00:33:31.600 millions of

00:33:32.160 dollars?

00:33:33.480 Huh.

00:33:34.680 Is it to

00:33:35.420 make the

00:33:35.860 millions of

00:33:36.420 dollars that

00:33:37.060 they know

00:33:37.380 they'll make,

00:33:38.640 or is it

00:33:40.540 to kill

00:33:42.680 off Trump's

00:33:43.420 vile,

00:33:43.980 repugnant

00:33:44.380 cult and

00:33:44.920 drive it

00:33:45.300 into the

00:33:45.660 dustbin of

00:33:46.120 history?

00:33:47.160 Which one

00:33:47.820 of those

00:33:48.140 seems slightly

00:33:49.700 more likely?

00:33:52.140 Have I ever

00:33:52.820 mentioned

00:33:53.400 follow the

00:33:54.840 money?

00:33:55.140 you know,

00:33:58.200 I tell you

00:33:58.800 it always

00:33:59.140 works,

00:33:59.620 even when

00:34:00.140 the people

00:34:00.520 involved are

00:34:01.160 not following

00:34:01.780 the money,

00:34:02.620 it still

00:34:03.000 always works.

00:34:04.440 Yeah,

00:34:04.720 the Lincoln

00:34:05.960 Project

00:34:06.460 grifters are

00:34:08.300 just accusing

00:34:09.260 Trump of

00:34:10.100 what they

00:34:10.460 are,

00:34:11.040 it's just

00:34:11.600 projection.

00:34:12.880 They are

00:34:13.460 horrible

00:34:14.220 grifters,

00:34:15.060 race grifters,

00:34:16.280 really some

00:34:16.820 of the worst

00:34:17.160 people in the

00:34:17.680 world,

00:34:18.140 I would say.

00:34:19.400 But they're

00:34:20.060 funny,

00:34:20.560 so I'm glad

00:34:21.160 they're in the

00:34:21.560 news.

00:34:22.960 CNN has

00:34:23.940 a wonderful

00:34:24.580 bit of

00:34:25.260 fake news

00:34:26.380 here,

00:34:26.760 and I'm

00:34:27.280 going to

00:34:27.460 see if you

00:34:27.840 can spot

00:34:28.320 it.

00:34:29.220 So I'll

00:34:29.540 tell you

00:34:29.840 what they

00:34:30.120 reported,

00:34:31.900 and then

00:34:32.220 you tell

00:34:32.540 me what

00:34:34.760 the fake

00:34:35.120 news part

00:34:35.560 is.

00:34:36.260 Okay?

00:34:37.120 So CNN

00:34:37.680 is reporting

00:34:38.320 that the

00:34:39.080 reason we

00:34:39.640 don't have

00:34:40.040 more rapid

00:34:41.360 tests and

00:34:42.460 faster,

00:34:43.180 you know,

00:34:43.340 why didn't

00:34:43.620 we have

00:34:43.920 this rapid

00:34:44.420 testing,

00:34:45.380 you know,

00:34:45.660 cheap and

00:34:46.080 fast?

00:34:46.640 Because we

00:34:47.080 did Project

00:34:47.840 Warp Speed,

00:34:49.220 so don't you

00:34:49.800 think we could

00:34:50.280 also get

00:34:50.780 rapid tests

00:34:51.420 quickly if

00:34:52.000 we wanted?

00:34:53.100 Here's what

00:34:53.680 CNN says

00:34:55.200 to describe

00:34:56.180 why we

00:34:58.600 don't have

00:34:59.000 them.

00:35:00.180 It's because

00:35:00.940 we don't have

00:35:01.720 tests because

00:35:02.320 there were

00:35:02.720 too many

00:35:03.300 available,

00:35:05.140 and the

00:35:06.200 Food and

00:35:06.540 Drug Administration

00:35:07.380 had more

00:35:08.380 than 3,000

00:35:09.360 emergency use

00:35:10.360 authorization

00:35:11.200 applications and

00:35:12.920 didn't have the

00:35:13.460 resources to

00:35:14.280 get through

00:35:14.620 them.

00:35:15.640 So the

00:35:16.040 reason that

00:35:16.540 we only

00:35:16.960 had one

00:35:17.680 Abbott

00:35:18.780 Labs for,

00:35:19.800 I don't

00:35:20.220 know,

00:35:20.440 months and

00:35:21.000 months,

00:35:21.520 the reason

00:35:22.140 we only

00:35:22.460 had one

00:35:23.000 is that

00:35:23.960 there were

00:35:24.340 3,000

00:35:25.880 others who

00:35:26.620 wanted,

00:35:27.860 but there

00:35:28.340 was not

00:35:28.800 enough FDA

00:35:29.540 resources to

00:35:31.520 test them,

00:35:32.420 so we had

00:35:33.160 to live with

00:35:33.620 just that

00:35:33.980 one for a

00:35:34.540 long time.

00:35:39.620 That,

00:35:40.960 ladies and 0.98

00:35:41.580 gentlemen,

00:35:42.520 is fake

00:35:43.060 news.

00:35:44.220 It's really

00:35:45.040 clever,

00:35:45.460 because what

00:35:46.940 do I keep

00:35:47.420 saying about

00:35:47.960 the reason

00:35:48.420 we don't

00:35:48.840 have the

00:35:49.540 rapid tests?

00:35:52.420 What do I

00:35:52.980 keep saying

00:35:53.600 loudly and

00:35:54.660 in public?

00:35:56.200 Corruption.

00:35:57.720 It's obviously

00:35:58.560 corruption.

00:35:59.520 I would say

00:36:00.020 at this point

00:36:00.560 that the

00:36:01.080 corruption

00:36:01.480 hypothesis,

00:36:03.920 I don't know,

00:36:04.420 95% likely,

00:36:07.140 because if this

00:36:08.460 is the best

00:36:10.040 alibi

00:36:11.280 that we

00:36:13.100 have,

00:36:14.040 the best

00:36:14.660 alibi from

00:36:15.340 the FDA

00:36:15.820 is that

00:36:16.360 there were

00:36:16.640 too many

00:36:17.240 of them

00:36:17.700 and they

00:36:18.520 didn't have

00:36:18.900 enough

00:36:19.160 resources.

00:36:20.700 What would

00:36:21.360 you do

00:36:21.800 if you

00:36:22.620 were the

00:36:22.860 FDA and

00:36:24.940 you didn't

00:36:25.240 have enough

00:36:25.940 resources?

00:36:26.780 You do have

00:36:27.260 some resources,

00:36:28.140 so it's not

00:36:28.600 like you're

00:36:28.940 not testing

00:36:29.440 anything.

00:36:30.920 You are

00:36:31.420 evaluating

00:36:31.860 things,

00:36:32.300 but you

00:36:32.540 can't do

00:36:32.920 3,000.

00:36:33.960 Would you

00:36:34.560 say,

00:36:36.260 hey guys,

00:36:37.000 let's

00:36:37.260 evaluate all

00:36:38.140 3,000

00:36:39.060 things at

00:36:40.480 once?

00:36:40.820 With our

00:36:41.540 limited

00:36:41.820 resources?

00:36:42.660 Is that

00:36:42.900 the way

00:36:43.120 you'd

00:36:43.300 handle it?

00:36:44.340 You take

00:36:44.780 your limited

00:36:45.220 resources in

00:36:46.100 the context

00:36:46.840 of a

00:36:47.180 pandemic,

00:36:48.300 you say,

00:36:48.780 we'd better

00:36:49.440 spread our

00:36:51.580 resources.

00:36:52.180 So you've

00:36:52.380 got 1,000

00:36:53.100 at first,

00:36:54.260 you say,

00:36:54.600 let's look

00:36:54.920 at them

00:36:55.100 all at

00:36:55.420 the same

00:36:55.700 time.

00:36:56.840 But then

00:36:57.180 it goes

00:36:57.420 to 3,000,

00:36:58.980 and it's

00:36:59.500 too fast

00:37:00.780 to add

00:37:01.100 people.

00:37:01.880 So do

00:37:02.140 you say

00:37:02.380 to yourself,

00:37:03.280 oh,

00:37:03.540 I'll just

00:37:03.920 work less

00:37:05.100 on the

00:37:05.380 first 1,000,

00:37:06.120 so I'll

00:37:06.320 have enough

00:37:06.660 for the

00:37:07.140 extra

00:37:07.920 thousands

00:37:08.360 of them?

00:37:09.480 Is that

00:37:10.040 the way

00:37:10.300 the FDA

00:37:10.840 decided to

00:37:12.000 manage that?

00:37:13.980 Now,

00:37:14.360 hiring help

00:37:14.940 wouldn't be

00:37:15.340 fast enough.

00:37:16.080 I have to

00:37:16.620 admit that

00:37:17.960 staffing up

00:37:18.900 probably would

00:37:19.780 be hard.

00:37:21.060 They should

00:37:21.500 do that

00:37:21.860 too,

00:37:22.820 but probably

00:37:24.260 that wouldn't

00:37:24.560 be a magic

00:37:25.060 bullet.

00:37:25.460 It just

00:37:25.680 feels like

00:37:26.160 it would,

00:37:26.520 but it

00:37:26.680 would take

00:37:26.940 a while

00:37:27.160 to staff

00:37:27.640 up.

00:37:27.860 I'm no

00:37:32.320 management

00:37:32.800 expert,

00:37:34.180 but here's

00:37:35.020 what I

00:37:35.340 would have

00:37:35.600 done.

00:37:36.560 I would

00:37:37.060 look at

00:37:37.340 those 3,000

00:37:38.200 applications,

00:37:39.000 and I

00:37:39.180 would say,

00:37:39.900 which ones

00:37:41.060 are the

00:37:41.340 biggest

00:37:41.640 companies

00:37:42.300 that are

00:37:43.520 likely to

00:37:44.080 be able

00:37:44.380 to produce

00:37:44.940 this in

00:37:45.520 volume?

00:37:46.960 Oh,

00:37:47.760 there are

00:37:48.400 only three

00:37:48.940 of them?

00:37:50.820 And then

00:37:51.520 I would

00:37:51.840 evaluate those

00:37:52.680 three,

00:37:53.660 and I

00:37:54.240 would tell

00:37:54.580 all the

00:37:55.040 other

00:37:55.260 thousands,

00:37:56.020 sorry,

00:37:56.340 you have

00:37:56.680 to wait.

00:37:57.780 Because it's

00:37:58.140 a pandemic,

00:37:58.880 we can't

00:37:59.220 be fair

00:37:59.640 about this,

00:38:00.200 we just

00:38:00.460 have to

00:38:02.220 hope we

00:38:02.640 pick some

00:38:03.060 winners,

00:38:03.900 we'll pick

00:38:04.260 the big

00:38:04.600 companies that

00:38:05.240 say they

00:38:05.680 can put

00:38:06.800 the resources

00:38:07.360 together to

00:38:08.040 produce,

00:38:08.840 they've got

00:38:09.240 a track

00:38:09.580 record of

00:38:10.060 producing.

00:38:11.060 Do you

00:38:11.520 think these

00:38:11.980 3,000

00:38:12.800 fucking

00:38:13.360 applications

00:38:13.980 were all

00:38:14.360 equal?

00:38:15.600 Do you

00:38:16.020 think that

00:38:16.380 anybody

00:38:16.680 looked at

00:38:17.140 these and

00:38:17.460 said,

00:38:17.720 yeah,

00:38:17.860 these look

00:38:18.260 all about

00:38:18.800 the fucking

00:38:19.340 same?

00:38:20.640 No.

00:38:22.220 No.

00:38:23.380 There were

00:38:23.800 some that

00:38:24.600 obviously looked

00:38:25.580 better than

00:38:26.020 the others.

00:38:28.000 Obviously.

00:38:30.120 This CNN

00:38:31.480 report is

00:38:32.740 complete

00:38:33.620 fucking

00:38:34.640 bullshit.

00:38:36.060 They did

00:38:36.720 not have a

00:38:37.300 problem because

00:38:37.980 too many

00:38:38.640 people wanted

00:38:39.220 to make

00:38:39.520 the fucking

00:38:40.140 rapid tests.

00:38:41.860 They didn't

00:38:42.840 do it because

00:38:43.580 they're corrupt.

00:38:44.880 We don't know

00:38:45.380 exactly how.

00:38:46.600 I mean,

00:38:46.780 the details are

00:38:47.580 unknown.

00:38:48.500 But this is

00:38:49.300 pure corruption

00:38:50.220 and the CNN

00:38:51.480 is part of it

00:38:52.080 now.

00:38:52.260 When I

00:38:53.600 asked you,

00:38:55.060 can you

00:38:55.420 Google which

00:38:56.240 pharma companies

00:38:57.380 advertise on

00:38:59.140 CNN,

00:39:00.400 I was looking

00:39:01.400 for Abbott

00:39:02.160 Labs because

00:39:03.580 I don't know

00:39:03.940 if they do.

00:39:06.320 But look for

00:39:07.060 it.

00:39:08.760 Is Abbott

00:39:09.400 Labs,

00:39:09.980 do they ever

00:39:10.640 advertise on

00:39:11.360 CNN?

00:39:11.780 I think they

00:39:12.160 do 100

00:39:12.520 million a year

00:39:13.120 in advertising,

00:39:13.880 maybe more

00:39:14.420 lately.

00:39:14.820 Is any of it

00:39:16.780 on CNN?

00:39:17.220 I don't

00:39:18.180 remember seeing

00:39:18.760 an ad from

00:39:19.200 them,

00:39:19.680 so maybe

00:39:20.040 not.

00:39:22.360 We know

00:39:22.840 Pfizer does,

00:39:23.580 we know

00:39:23.780 Big Pharma does

00:39:24.560 all the time.

00:39:26.180 But take a

00:39:28.940 look at that

00:39:29.360 and tell me

00:39:31.180 if CNN is

00:39:32.560 just in on

00:39:33.520 the corruption

00:39:34.060 and is trying

00:39:35.700 to develop a

00:39:37.100 cover story

00:39:37.860 for why Abbott

00:39:39.780 Labs had a

00:39:41.060 monopoly for

00:39:42.000 so long.

00:39:45.500 All right.

00:39:46.140 That's all

00:39:47.000 for now.

00:39:48.820 On that

00:39:49.720 topic,

00:39:50.060 anyway.

00:39:55.420 Have you

00:39:56.500 listened to

00:39:57.120 Dark Horse

00:39:58.040 podcast with

00:39:59.980 Brett and

00:40:02.320 Heather,

00:40:03.540 so Brett

00:40:04.000 Weinstein?

00:40:05.200 And I guess

00:40:05.700 one of the

00:40:06.220 evidences he

00:40:07.080 showed about

00:40:07.980 ivermectin

00:40:09.500 working is

00:40:10.160 that when it

00:40:12.380 was widely

00:40:12.920 available in

00:40:13.840 Slovakia,

00:40:14.840 they basically

00:40:17.500 crushed the

00:40:18.180 virus.

00:40:19.460 So that was

00:40:20.040 one of the

00:40:20.560 evidences for

00:40:21.320 that.

00:40:22.800 But Andres

00:40:23.600 Backhouse,

00:40:24.660 he made a

00:40:26.840 sarcastic tweet

00:40:27.700 about that and

00:40:28.320 Twitter banned

00:40:28.900 him because they

00:40:29.360 couldn't tell his

00:40:29.920 parody from his

00:40:31.240 actual opinion.

00:40:32.860 It's 2021.

00:40:34.540 You've got to be

00:40:35.300 careful about your

00:40:36.040 parody because

00:40:37.280 people can't 0.97

00:40:37.940 tell.

00:40:38.880 I mean,

00:40:39.120 they actually

00:40:39.680 legitimately can't

00:40:40.760 tell when you're

00:40:41.540 joking these days

00:40:42.360 because everything

00:40:43.260 is so ridiculous

00:40:44.140 that a joke

00:40:45.520 looks like

00:40:45.960 reality.

00:40:46.980 There's no

00:40:47.420 difference anymore.

00:40:49.000 So Andres got

00:40:49.880 temporarily locked

00:40:51.420 out for making

00:40:52.280 a joke about it.

00:40:53.900 But Slovakia

00:40:56.220 has announced a

00:40:57.100 nationwide

00:40:57.520 coronavirus lockdown.

00:40:59.960 So if ivermectin

00:41:01.220 were making a big

00:41:02.080 deal in Slovakia,

00:41:03.340 well, it's

00:41:03.720 stopped doing

00:41:04.240 that.

00:41:05.140 And Andres

00:41:06.420 tweeted out

00:41:08.000 that maybe there

00:41:09.040 was a variant

00:41:10.240 that escaped

00:41:11.240 the ivermectin.

00:41:13.040 Maybe it's an

00:41:13.900 ivermectin escape

00:41:14.960 variant, which is

00:41:16.300 just a joke.

00:41:17.840 But Twitter

00:41:18.620 couldn't tell the

00:41:19.200 difference until

00:41:19.800 they locked him

00:41:20.340 out.

00:41:22.480 So one of the

00:41:24.340 key evidences

00:41:25.840 that you heard

00:41:27.080 from Brett and

00:41:28.520 Heather on

00:41:29.160 Dark Horse, that

00:41:30.740 appears to be

00:41:31.460 debunked.

00:41:32.720 And again, let me

00:41:33.700 be very careful in

00:41:34.840 my wording.

00:41:35.980 I'm not telling

00:41:36.640 you ivermectin

00:41:37.360 doesn't work.

00:41:38.080 How would I

00:41:40.180 know?

00:41:41.120 I'm just telling

00:41:41.680 you that these

00:41:42.360 countrywide evidences,

00:41:44.940 they're all

00:41:45.340 bullshit.

00:41:47.760 All right.

00:41:50.540 Jay Lecombe

00:41:51.680 healthfully

00:41:52.980 suggested that

00:41:54.580 I host a

00:41:56.520 live stream

00:41:56.940 debate with

00:41:57.480 Pierre Corey,

00:41:59.120 I think on

00:42:00.280 ivermectin.

00:42:01.400 And it would

00:42:01.940 be a service

00:42:02.420 to your viewers

00:42:03.220 no matter what

00:42:04.260 happened, to

00:42:05.740 which I will

00:42:06.220 tell you for

00:42:06.680 the millionth

00:42:07.300 time.

00:42:10.240 Go on

00:42:10.780 fall says in

00:42:11.760 large capital

00:42:12.680 letters, you

00:42:14.240 do know it

00:42:14.800 works, Scott.

00:42:15.680 Let me say

00:42:16.060 clearly, I

00:42:18.520 don't know

00:42:18.980 that it

00:42:19.280 works.

00:42:20.400 Like,

00:42:20.760 legitimately, I

00:42:21.500 don't know.

00:42:23.480 If I had to

00:42:24.300 put money on

00:42:25.000 it?

00:42:26.260 Yeah, that's a

00:42:28.040 good question.

00:42:29.540 If I had to

00:42:30.460 bet money, and

00:42:32.380 it wasn't

00:42:32.680 betting my

00:42:33.080 life, but

00:42:33.700 let's say it's

00:42:34.080 just a financial

00:42:34.840 bet and I

00:42:35.400 could afford

00:42:35.880 it, would I

00:42:37.540 bet that

00:42:38.060 ivermectin

00:42:39.780 works?

00:42:42.140 That's a

00:42:42.700 tough one.

00:42:43.940 Because I

00:42:44.520 think that you

00:42:45.440 might have a

00:42:45.920 situation where

00:42:46.680 it works in

00:42:47.320 some special

00:42:47.980 cases.

00:42:50.560 I wouldn't

00:42:51.440 rule that

00:42:51.880 out, because I

00:42:53.200 don't think we

00:42:53.620 have enough

00:42:53.940 evidence of

00:42:54.500 that one way

00:42:54.980 or the other.

00:42:56.020 But I feel

00:42:58.060 like if I had

00:42:58.740 to take the

00:42:59.260 bet, I'd bet

00:43:02.080 against it.

00:43:02.560 I would

00:43:04.820 think, in

00:43:05.480 my opinion,

00:43:06.320 the body of

00:43:07.660 unreliable

00:43:09.580 information,

00:43:10.280 because it's

00:43:10.580 all unreliable,

00:43:11.460 right?

00:43:12.120 To me, the

00:43:12.800 body of

00:43:13.500 information suggests

00:43:14.540 that it

00:43:14.840 doesn't work.

00:43:16.080 But I would

00:43:16.800 say I have

00:43:17.360 more like a

00:43:18.020 60-40 on

00:43:19.200 this.

00:43:20.040 So I would

00:43:20.640 bet the 60% 0.99

00:43:21.700 that it

00:43:22.500 doesn't work,

00:43:23.700 but I'm

00:43:24.260 completely open

00:43:25.340 to a full

00:43:27.220 40% possibility

00:43:28.760 that it works

00:43:29.960 for some

00:43:30.400 people in some

00:43:31.040 situations.

00:43:31.640 It might.

00:43:33.200 You can't

00:43:33.540 rule it out.

00:43:35.300 So, anyway,

00:43:36.980 let me say

00:43:37.740 that me talking

00:43:38.660 to one expert

00:43:39.600 will never be a

00:43:40.440 good business

00:43:40.940 model.

00:43:42.000 It will only

00:43:42.480 make things

00:43:42.960 worse every

00:43:43.680 time.

00:43:44.400 And there

00:43:44.760 can be no

00:43:45.200 exceptions to

00:43:45.900 this.

00:43:46.640 What would

00:43:47.220 work is have

00:43:48.200 two experts

00:43:49.560 or more,

00:43:50.760 one on each

00:43:51.440 side of the

00:43:51.860 topic, and

00:43:52.940 me hosting it.

00:43:54.260 That would

00:43:54.900 work pretty

00:43:55.340 well.

00:43:56.080 As long as

00:43:56.920 they had some

00:43:57.420 time and they

00:43:58.260 could maybe

00:43:59.500 do a little

00:44:00.380 research on

00:44:01.140 the questions

00:44:01.800 each give

00:44:02.240 each other.

00:44:03.020 So you'd

00:44:03.420 have to figure

00:44:03.880 out how

00:44:04.260 they could

00:44:04.600 do a proper

00:44:06.140 counter response

00:44:07.320 to stuff.

00:44:08.160 Yeah, maybe

00:44:08.620 do it over

00:44:09.100 one to three

00:44:09.660 days.

00:44:10.100 Don't do it

00:44:10.580 in one day.

00:44:11.640 That would

00:44:12.220 work.

00:44:12.940 But please

00:44:13.660 don't ask me

00:44:14.600 to interview

00:44:15.080 one rogue

00:44:16.300 doctor.

00:44:17.400 There's no

00:44:18.020 way that can

00:44:18.740 give you good

00:44:19.220 information because

00:44:20.220 I won't know

00:44:20.600 what to ask.

00:44:21.540 Here's how

00:44:21.940 that would

00:44:22.220 go.

00:44:23.140 Me.

00:44:24.020 Hey, do you

00:44:24.440 have any proof

00:44:25.260 that your

00:44:26.320 opinion works or

00:44:27.640 your opinion is

00:44:28.400 correct?

00:44:28.760 rogue doctor.

00:44:31.060 Yes, there

00:44:31.840 was the

00:44:32.440 Eastern European

00:44:34.160 Indian

00:44:34.840 subcontinent

00:44:36.240 study that

00:44:37.980 was just

00:44:38.340 completed and

00:44:39.080 then what

00:44:39.360 do I say?

00:44:40.920 Oh, that's

00:44:43.260 the end of the

00:44:43.660 conversation.

00:44:44.860 I can't fact

00:44:45.580 check them in

00:44:46.060 real time.

00:44:48.200 Have you seen

00:44:49.000 a credible

00:44:49.440 comparison with

00:44:50.320 the other

00:44:50.620 protease inhibitors

00:44:52.780 now being brought

00:44:53.480 to market with

00:44:54.120 incredible

00:44:54.620 purported

00:44:55.880 outcomes?

00:44:56.380 critical

00:44:58.600 comparison.

00:45:00.740 I don't

00:45:01.260 understand the

00:45:01.840 question, Chad,

00:45:03.280 but maybe

00:45:03.740 somebody else

00:45:04.320 does.

00:45:05.040 Are you

00:45:05.240 talking about

00:45:05.620 as a

00:45:07.200 treatment for

00:45:07.720 COVID or

00:45:08.820 are you

00:45:09.140 comparing two

00:45:09.820 different

00:45:10.300 fields?

00:45:12.720 I don't know

00:45:13.280 the nature of

00:45:13.800 that question.

00:45:15.240 All right.

00:45:17.780 Plenty of

00:45:18.440 doctors seeing

00:45:19.340 the successes.

00:45:20.200 No, they're

00:45:20.460 seeing the

00:45:20.820 anecdotes.

00:45:21.800 They're seeing

00:45:22.100 the anecdotes.

00:45:23.480 So I saw

00:45:24.240 somebody send

00:45:24.880 me the

00:45:25.340 anecdote of

00:45:26.160 the man

00:45:26.680 who was on

00:45:27.020 the ventilator

00:45:27.700 and a judge

00:45:30.020 allowed him to

00:45:30.680 have ivermectin

00:45:31.500 and he came

00:45:32.560 back to life.

00:45:33.780 And so

00:45:34.040 therefore ivermectin

00:45:35.140 must work

00:45:35.700 because there

00:45:36.660 was a guy in

00:45:37.320 the ventilator

00:45:37.840 and he came

00:45:38.180 back to life.

00:45:39.360 And here's

00:45:40.120 what's missing

00:45:40.600 in the story.

00:45:41.900 Is there

00:45:42.460 anywhere in

00:45:43.020 the United

00:45:43.380 States where

00:45:45.040 there's somebody

00:45:45.740 who's so bad

00:45:47.640 off with COVID

00:45:48.380 that they're on

00:45:48.920 a ventilator

00:45:49.520 and have not

00:45:50.980 been given

00:45:51.440 Regeneron?

00:45:54.440 Anywhere?

00:45:55.340 Because I'm

00:45:57.040 sure these

00:45:57.420 stories about

00:45:57.980 the guy who

00:45:58.500 got ivermectin

00:45:59.740 also got

00:46:01.420 Regeneron and

00:46:02.300 we know that

00:46:02.800 works, right?

00:46:05.080 So how could

00:46:05.800 you possibly

00:46:06.280 tell what was

00:46:06.920 the one that

00:46:07.240 was working?

00:46:09.300 I wouldn't

00:46:09.860 trust any of

00:46:10.380 those stories.

00:46:12.720 So there's a

00:46:13.440 new variant

00:46:13.980 right on time.

00:46:16.120 Did you think

00:46:16.860 things were

00:46:17.280 going to open

00:46:17.700 up or did

00:46:18.280 you think

00:46:18.580 there would

00:46:18.800 be a new

00:46:19.160 variant right

00:46:20.320 on time?

00:46:21.420 Well, here it

00:46:21.980 comes.

00:46:22.360 And it's

00:46:24.060 been given

00:46:24.480 a racist

00:46:24.920 name, which

00:46:25.520 is weird.

00:46:26.280 It's called

00:46:26.720 the South

00:46:27.220 African variant.

00:46:28.860 Now, that's

00:46:29.300 what the

00:46:29.620 racists call

00:46:30.300 it.

00:46:30.960 I would

00:46:31.580 call it

00:46:31.960 the COVID

00:46:34.760 some Greek

00:46:37.460 symbol variant

00:46:38.860 because I'm

00:46:40.480 not a racist.

00:46:42.500 But as Steve

00:46:43.340 Cortez points

00:46:44.020 out, the BBC

00:46:45.960 is calling it

00:46:46.620 the South

00:46:47.020 Africa variant.

00:46:47.740 And, you

00:46:48.740 know, you

00:46:49.060 certainly

00:46:49.360 couldn't call

00:46:49.940 the COVID

00:46:51.080 a Chinese

00:46:52.220 virus or

00:46:53.780 a China 0.92

00:46:54.200 virus, which

00:46:55.920 would be less

00:46:56.580 about the

00:46:56.920 people and

00:46:57.280 more about

00:46:57.580 the country.

00:47:00.020 But why

00:47:02.740 is this

00:47:03.080 okay?

00:47:05.160 Do you

00:47:05.660 notice that

00:47:06.100 the rules

00:47:06.560 just go

00:47:07.080 away when

00:47:08.080 they're not

00:47:08.640 convenient?

00:47:12.300 That's

00:47:12.820 right.

00:47:14.020 Today is

00:47:14.580 not Black 0.99

00:47:15.120 Friday.

00:47:15.660 Today is

00:47:16.820 all people

00:47:17.660 Friday.

00:47:18.800 All people

00:47:19.240 Friday.

00:47:22.140 All right,

00:47:22.780 well, it

00:47:23.460 looks like

00:47:23.880 we're going

00:47:24.260 to be served

00:47:24.780 up an

00:47:25.380 infinite number

00:47:26.720 of variants,

00:47:27.760 but the

00:47:28.260 big ones

00:47:28.700 will come

00:47:29.200 on schedule

00:47:30.460 because what

00:47:31.840 is the

00:47:32.220 schedule?

00:47:33.080 Right now.

00:47:33.940 This is when

00:47:34.720 we should be

00:47:35.240 afraid of the

00:47:35.760 variants so

00:47:36.780 that we're

00:47:37.020 shutting down

00:47:37.540 our economies

00:47:38.120 again.

00:47:39.580 Get your

00:47:40.080 tenth booster

00:47:40.800 shot, Scott.

00:47:42.620 There's

00:47:42.860 somebody in

00:47:43.320 all caps who

00:47:44.020 is very

00:47:44.420 concerned for

00:47:45.680 me.

00:47:46.000 Thank you.

00:47:46.820 Would you

00:47:48.580 shout at me

00:47:50.040 in all caps

00:47:50.560 again?

00:47:51.000 I liked

00:47:51.400 it.

00:47:58.320 All right,

00:47:58.960 looking at

00:47:59.420 your comments

00:47:59.900 for a

00:48:00.280 moment.

00:48:04.600 All right.

00:48:09.900 Oh, you

00:48:10.500 love me?

00:48:11.380 Well, thank

00:48:11.900 you.

00:48:13.580 Get that flag

00:48:14.540 up?

00:48:14.760 I don't

00:48:14.980 know what

00:48:15.180 that means.

00:48:17.020 Here in

00:48:17.460 Europe, we're

00:48:17.880 calling it

00:48:18.280 the Botswana

00:48:18.900 variant.

00:48:21.560 Okay.

00:48:22.960 Does

00:48:23.280 hypnosis

00:48:23.700 help chronic

00:48:24.540 pain?

00:48:25.100 I'm being

00:48:25.500 asked.

00:48:27.340 I think it

00:48:28.220 can.

00:48:29.020 I think it

00:48:29.580 can.

00:48:30.140 But it

00:48:30.740 also depends

00:48:31.260 on the

00:48:31.520 person and

00:48:32.160 the hypnotist.

00:48:33.540 And given

00:48:34.800 the pain is

00:48:35.660 part real and

00:48:36.760 part, you

00:48:38.060 know, how you

00:48:38.520 process it,

00:48:39.500 I think you

00:48:40.280 can.

00:48:40.480 I'm not

00:48:41.120 100% sure

00:48:41.820 of that, by

00:48:42.200 the way,

00:48:42.720 because I've

00:48:43.120 never tried

00:48:43.660 it.

00:48:45.660 But I've

00:48:46.280 heard acupuncture

00:48:46.940 can work in

00:48:47.580 some cases,

00:48:48.200 depending on

00:48:48.620 the pain.

00:48:50.500 By the

00:48:51.080 way, I'm

00:48:53.160 a big

00:48:53.580 acupuncture

00:48:54.420 skeptic, but

00:48:57.380 I've been

00:48:57.680 getting it

00:48:58.080 lately for

00:48:59.800 just relaxation.

00:49:01.420 And it is

00:49:01.940 crazy how

00:49:02.960 much it

00:49:03.320 relaxes you.

00:49:04.020 the first

00:49:07.520 time I

00:49:08.460 thought,

00:49:08.760 okay, that's

00:49:09.440 anecdotal, I

00:49:10.920 got real

00:49:11.300 relaxed afterwards,

00:49:12.440 that can't be

00:49:13.000 anything real.

00:49:14.420 But I've

00:49:15.460 repeated it a

00:49:16.200 number of

00:49:16.520 times.

00:49:17.220 And how

00:49:17.680 you feel

00:49:18.200 after you

00:49:18.700 get acupuncture,

00:49:20.040 if you're

00:49:20.440 doing it for

00:49:20.960 relaxation

00:49:21.460 specifically,

00:49:22.960 it's kind

00:49:23.680 of freaky.

00:49:24.860 It's kind

00:49:25.200 of freaky.

00:49:25.800 You wouldn't

00:49:26.160 expect it to

00:49:26.740 have anything.

00:49:27.500 Now, you

00:49:27.880 might say

00:49:28.260 to me,

00:49:29.300 Scott,

00:49:29.660 Scott,

00:49:29.920 Scott,

00:49:30.520 it's all

00:49:31.600 the placebo

00:49:32.980 effect.

00:49:34.020 But if it

00:49:34.620 works every

00:49:35.120 time,

00:49:36.860 why would

00:49:39.020 I not

00:49:39.300 do it?

00:49:40.540 I mean,

00:49:40.880 it doesn't

00:49:41.180 matter what

00:49:41.540 it is.

00:49:41.940 If it

00:49:42.160 works every

00:49:42.600 time,

00:49:43.440 I'm going

00:49:43.680 to keep

00:49:43.900 doing it.

00:49:47.680 Call

00:49:48.040 John

00:49:49.400 Dvorak

00:49:49.820 and pick

00:49:50.320 his brain

00:49:50.840 about

00:49:51.340 COVID and

00:49:53.360 about

00:49:53.580 therapies.

00:49:55.040 He's done

00:49:55.580 the analysis

00:49:56.180 that you're

00:49:56.720 unwilling to

00:49:57.340 do.

00:49:59.660 All right.

00:50:00.940 John

00:50:01.420 Dvorak,

00:50:01.900 if you're

00:50:02.260 watching,

00:50:02.640 I don't

00:50:04.240 know if

00:50:04.440 you know,

00:50:04.680 but I've

00:50:05.980 known John

00:50:06.580 Dvorak for

00:50:07.220 100 years.

00:50:09.180 And every

00:50:10.820 once in a

00:50:11.140 while we'll

00:50:11.560 chat and

00:50:14.020 get together

00:50:14.520 or whatever.

00:50:15.400 But that

00:50:17.580 would be the

00:50:18.080 same thing as

00:50:19.700 if I talked

00:50:20.180 to one

00:50:20.500 expert.

00:50:21.860 So I

00:50:23.320 will grant

00:50:23.780 you that

00:50:24.280 John has

00:50:24.920 probably

00:50:25.180 researched it

00:50:25.920 more than I

00:50:26.400 have.

00:50:26.640 But you know

00:50:29.020 it would have

00:50:29.380 no value,

00:50:30.100 right?

00:50:31.040 That me

00:50:31.440 talking to

00:50:31.920 him.

00:50:32.460 Because it

00:50:32.700 would be

00:50:32.900 exactly the

00:50:33.480 same as

00:50:33.780 if I

00:50:34.020 talked to

00:50:34.340 the expert.

00:50:35.460 So why

00:50:36.100 do you

00:50:36.340 believe X,

00:50:37.260 John?

00:50:38.020 And then

00:50:38.600 John says,

00:50:39.200 well, I

00:50:39.560 researched it

00:50:40.240 and I

00:50:40.600 found such

00:50:41.460 and such

00:50:41.820 a study.

00:50:43.520 And then

00:50:44.060 what do I

00:50:44.420 say?

00:50:46.100 That's it,

00:50:46.780 right?

00:50:47.780 What do I

00:50:48.420 say?

00:50:49.160 You found

00:50:49.540 a study.

00:50:51.000 Do I

00:50:51.320 say,

00:50:51.740 sometimes

00:50:52.720 studies aren't

00:50:53.480 reliable?

00:50:54.160 I think he

00:50:54.640 knows that.

00:50:55.840 Do I

00:50:56.200 say,

00:50:57.180 you know,

00:50:57.580 if it's

00:50:57.860 only one

00:50:58.420 randomized

00:50:58.800 controlled

00:50:59.300 study,

00:50:59.780 I'd like

00:51:00.240 to see

00:51:00.560 two?

00:51:01.580 I think

00:51:02.100 John knows

00:51:02.560 that.

00:51:03.400 All right?

00:51:03.880 What could I

00:51:04.640 possibly say

00:51:05.620 to John

00:51:06.780 Dvorak that

00:51:07.380 he doesn't

00:51:07.740 already know

00:51:08.320 about this

00:51:08.940 topic?

00:51:09.900 How in

00:51:10.560 the world

00:51:11.140 could that

00:51:12.260 conversation

00:51:12.800 help you?

00:51:14.360 It

00:51:14.660 couldn't.

00:51:15.720 It

00:51:15.940 couldn't.

00:51:19.980 How does

00:51:20.780 inflation

00:51:21.220 ever stop?

00:51:23.260 Well,

00:51:23.980 it's stopped

00:51:24.840 everywhere that

00:51:25.720 it's happened

00:51:26.480 where the

00:51:27.460 country hasn't

00:51:28.020 gone under,

00:51:28.540 right?

00:51:29.560 There are

00:51:29.980 plenty of

00:51:30.500 countries.

00:51:31.240 Is Israel 0.87

00:51:31.720 one?

00:51:33.280 Give me a

00:51:34.140 history lesson,

00:51:34.860 those of you

00:51:35.300 who are

00:51:35.500 smarter than

00:51:35.980 I am about

00:51:36.540 history,

00:51:36.980 which would

00:51:37.280 be most

00:51:37.640 of you.

00:51:38.700 Didn't

00:51:39.100 Israel at 0.56

00:51:40.200 one point

00:51:40.620 have just

00:51:41.560 horrible

00:51:41.880 inflation?

00:51:43.400 And now

00:51:44.060 they don't?

00:51:45.180 Do me a

00:51:45.580 fact check on

00:51:46.100 that.

00:51:47.380 And I

00:51:47.960 think there

00:51:48.980 are a number

00:51:49.280 of other

00:51:49.600 places that

00:51:50.120 have had

00:51:50.420 horrible

00:51:50.920 inflation and

00:51:52.800 survived.

00:51:53.980 So somehow

00:51:54.480 they got

00:51:54.800 past it.

00:51:55.260 Yeah,

00:51:57.460 and then

00:51:57.700 there would

00:51:57.960 be other

00:51:58.280 places where

00:51:58.860 they didn't.

00:51:59.760 Is that

00:52:00.020 correct?

00:52:01.600 So if

00:52:03.060 there are

00:52:03.380 places that

00:52:03.960 had massive

00:52:04.540 inflation and

00:52:05.540 then got

00:52:06.220 past it,

00:52:06.960 then there

00:52:07.500 is a way

00:52:07.880 to get

00:52:08.120 past it.

00:52:09.300 But I'm

00:52:09.860 not sure

00:52:10.220 anybody

00:52:11.680 understands

00:52:12.340 it.

00:52:12.960 It could

00:52:13.280 be you

00:52:13.540 have to

00:52:13.760 have massive

00:52:14.300 productivity

00:52:15.120 gains,

00:52:15.640 right?

00:52:17.300 Or no,

00:52:17.860 maybe not.

00:52:19.800 Stop

00:52:20.240 spending,

00:52:20.900 stop

00:52:21.100 printing

00:52:21.380 money.

00:52:22.440 Well,

00:52:22.780 we can't

00:52:23.160 do that

00:52:23.500 with our

00:52:23.780 current

00:52:24.020 government

00:52:24.380 situation,

00:52:25.140 but do

00:52:29.920 you think

00:52:30.180 the current

00:52:30.800 real estate

00:52:31.280 market will

00:52:31.880 correct?

00:52:32.660 Of course.

00:52:34.460 Yeah.

00:52:34.960 Easiest

00:52:35.400 question in

00:52:35.920 the world

00:52:36.180 I'm being

00:52:36.500 asked.

00:52:36.860 Do I

00:52:36.980 think the

00:52:37.400 real estate

00:52:38.080 market will

00:52:39.360 correct?

00:52:40.860 Yeah.

00:52:41.500 Yeah,

00:52:42.180 of course it

00:52:43.000 will.

00:52:43.520 I don't know

00:52:44.020 when and I

00:52:45.440 don't know

00:52:45.700 how much.

00:52:47.180 But I

00:52:48.000 will also

00:52:48.500 confidently

00:52:49.120 predict that

00:52:50.220 it will

00:52:50.480 recover in

00:52:51.420 time.

00:52:52.540 Eventually it

00:52:53.080 will recover.

00:52:54.380 All right,

00:52:54.940 Wesley says,

00:52:56.300 is it

00:52:58.920 possible to

00:52:59.380 ever stop

00:52:59.900 seeing it?

00:53:01.140 Oh,

00:53:01.380 when people

00:53:01.780 start seeing

00:53:02.440 the fake

00:53:03.300 news,

00:53:03.840 can they

00:53:04.260 learn to

00:53:04.980 unsee it?

00:53:05.500 Yeah,

00:53:05.680 I think

00:53:05.960 so.

00:53:08.220 Ask

00:53:08.660 yourself,

00:53:10.400 you know,

00:53:10.620 was there

00:53:10.960 a time when

00:53:11.600 you were

00:53:11.880 more believing

00:53:12.760 in the

00:53:13.140 news and

00:53:13.720 now you're

00:53:14.540 not?

00:53:15.240 I would

00:53:15.520 say that

00:53:15.920 is certainly

00:53:16.820 the case

00:53:17.220 for me.

00:53:18.400 I would

00:53:18.760 say that

00:53:19.120 in my

00:53:19.460 youth I

00:53:19.960 would

00:53:20.160 generally

00:53:20.520 have thought

00:53:21.000 the news

00:53:21.500 was right

00:53:22.420 99%

00:53:24.060 of the

00:53:24.300 time.

00:53:25.500 Today,

00:53:26.140 if it's

00:53:26.420 political

00:53:26.880 news,

00:53:27.360 I assume

00:53:27.800 it's wrong.

00:53:29.160 I just

00:53:29.520 assume it's

00:53:30.020 wrong.

00:53:30.640 And that's

00:53:30.880 a pretty

00:53:31.100 big change

00:53:31.760 from almost

00:53:32.900 certainly

00:53:33.220 right to

00:53:33.820 I just

00:53:34.200 assume that's

00:53:34.720 not true.

00:53:36.440 Right?

00:53:37.260 And I think

00:53:37.920 a lot of us

00:53:38.380 went through

00:53:38.680 that same

00:53:39.080 journey,

00:53:39.540 so yes,

00:53:40.700 I believe

00:53:41.320 that people

00:53:41.820 can understand

00:53:42.720 that they're

00:53:44.500 being

00:53:45.920 bamboozled.

00:53:46.560 prediction on

00:53:52.460 the

00:53:52.660 Brandon

00:53:53.160 thing

00:53:53.540 lasting

00:53:53.960 past

00:53:54.300 2022.

00:53:55.560 I don't

00:53:56.280 know that

00:53:56.660 that has

00:53:57.020 legs,

00:53:57.700 but maybe.

00:53:58.900 I didn't

00:53:59.360 think MAGA

00:53:59.900 was the

00:54:00.360 greatest thing.

00:54:03.120 I like

00:54:03.640 Make America

00:54:04.340 Great Again.

00:54:05.660 I don't

00:54:06.140 like the

00:54:06.600 abbreviation

00:54:07.220 MAGA,

00:54:08.420 because it's

00:54:08.880 too obviously

00:54:09.620 like a

00:54:10.080 MAGA.

00:54:11.500 And of

00:54:11.980 course,

00:54:12.220 all the

00:54:12.460 critics

00:54:12.860 picked up

00:54:13.540 on that

00:54:13.860 in about

00:54:14.840 a half

00:54:15.120 a second.

00:54:15.480 So you

00:54:16.540 should always

00:54:16.940 run your

00:54:17.420 slogans

00:54:18.040 past a

00:54:18.520 cartoonist.

00:54:19.760 This is

00:54:20.380 good advice.

00:54:21.580 You come

00:54:21.960 up with a

00:54:22.340 good acronym

00:54:22.880 or a good

00:54:23.880 slogan,

00:54:25.100 run it

00:54:25.560 past a

00:54:25.940 cartoonist.

00:54:27.160 Because you

00:54:27.520 know what

00:54:27.740 we're good

00:54:28.120 at?

00:54:30.280 Mocking

00:54:30.760 things with

00:54:31.860 words.

00:54:32.840 If I can

00:54:33.440 mock it,

00:54:34.820 better think.

00:54:37.240 When

00:54:37.400 Wells Fargo

00:54:38.200 was actually

00:54:40.560 Crocker Bank

00:54:41.200 before Wells Fargo

00:54:42.100 bought them.

00:54:42.800 But when I

00:54:43.180 worked for a

00:54:43.560 bank years

00:54:43.980 ago,

00:54:44.220 they came

00:54:44.500 up with a

00:54:44.880 slogan.

00:54:45.480 Good

00:54:46.160 Enough

00:54:46.460 Isn't.

00:54:47.700 And the

00:54:48.000 idea was

00:54:48.640 that you'd

00:54:48.960 never be

00:54:49.320 satisfied with

00:54:50.080 the quality.

00:54:51.220 Good

00:54:51.440 Enough

00:54:51.740 Isn't.

00:54:52.960 Now that

00:54:53.320 was a

00:54:53.620 slogan they

00:54:54.180 should have

00:54:54.560 run past

00:54:55.080 me before

00:54:55.960 they implemented

00:54:56.600 it.

00:54:57.860 What did

00:54:58.540 the employees

00:54:59.140 do instantly

00:55:00.440 with their

00:55:01.100 own slogan,

00:55:02.380 Good

00:55:02.540 Enough

00:55:02.840 Isn't?

00:55:05.020 Pretty

00:55:05.540 much every

00:55:06.040 time they

00:55:06.460 slapped

00:55:06.800 something

00:55:07.160 together,

00:55:08.080 they looked

00:55:08.540 at it,

00:55:08.960 they looked

00:55:09.280 at whoever

00:55:09.640 was standing

00:55:10.180 next to

00:55:10.640 them,

00:55:11.200 they laughed

00:55:11.900 and said,

00:55:12.880 Eh,

00:55:13.140 Good

00:55:13.300 Enough

00:55:13.540 Is.

00:55:15.700 It just

00:55:16.300 immediately

00:55:16.700 became the

00:55:17.260 opposite.

00:55:19.120 I would

00:55:19.700 have told

00:55:20.020 you that.

00:55:21.080 I could

00:55:21.620 have told

00:55:21.880 you that

00:55:22.140 before you

00:55:22.560 did that

00:55:22.960 slogan.

00:55:23.720 I could

00:55:24.060 have told

00:55:24.320 you that

00:55:24.600 right off

00:55:25.000 the bat.

00:55:25.960 You know

00:55:26.500 people are

00:55:26.860 going to say

00:55:27.160 Good

00:55:27.340 Enough

00:55:27.540 Is.

00:55:28.180 And that's

00:55:28.540 going to be,

00:55:29.580 you're going to

00:55:29.900 hear that more

00:55:30.520 than your

00:55:30.900 slogan.

00:55:31.600 You know

00:55:31.880 that,

00:55:32.160 right?

00:55:33.280 Well,

00:55:33.500 I could

00:55:34.380 have told

00:55:34.640 them.

00:55:42.140 Build

00:55:42.680 back

00:55:42.960 better.

00:55:44.200 Build

00:55:44.720 back

00:55:44.980 better is

00:55:45.460 actually

00:55:45.960 about too

00:55:46.860 bad.

00:55:50.340 At

00:55:50.860 least they

00:55:51.220 didn't do

00:55:51.720 build back

00:55:52.680 carefully.

00:55:54.940 I'll let

00:55:55.600 that one

00:55:55.920 just sit

00:55:56.620 there for

00:55:56.900 a while.

00:55:57.940 At

00:55:58.140 least they

00:55:58.540 didn't do

00:55:59.060 build back

00:56:00.320 carefully.

00:56:02.040 Anybody?

00:56:02.560 Anybody?

00:56:06.420 Thank you.

00:56:07.400 All right.

00:56:07.700 Some got

00:56:08.140 my joke.

00:56:13.600 You hated

00:56:14.360 it initially.

00:56:15.600 Build

00:56:15.780 back

00:56:15.980 better?

00:56:16.800 Oh,

00:56:17.020 I don't

00:56:17.240 think that

00:56:17.720 build back

00:56:18.180 better is

00:56:19.880 like changing

00:56:20.380 the world.

00:56:21.120 What I

00:56:21.600 think is

00:56:21.940 that it's

00:56:22.280 unmockable.

00:56:24.160 It's

00:56:24.520 hard to

00:56:25.300 mock it.

00:56:30.180 My cat

00:56:30.920 yelling at

00:56:31.360 me?

00:56:32.560 Do you

00:56:34.280 mind if

00:56:34.580 I pause

00:56:35.020 to get

00:56:35.320 my cat?

00:56:37.080 Do you

00:56:37.320 mind?

00:56:37.960 One

00:56:38.300 moment.

00:56:39.800 Bring

00:56:40.480 her right 0.53

00:56:40.720 back.

00:56:40.960 Thank you.

00:57:10.960 So as you can see, she still has her feeding tube in, and her bandaging is getting a little ragged.

00:57:23.720 I have to redo the wrapping every day.

00:57:34.920 So she's got a few more days of the feeding tube.

00:57:40.660 We don't use it for food.

00:57:42.040 She can eat okay.

00:57:43.380 I just use it for the medicine because she won't take medicine without spitting it out. 1.00

00:57:46.860 So we just left it in for a little while.

00:57:49.460 And in a few days, she'll get this off, and she'll be all good.

00:57:57.660 She doesn't like this as much as you'd think.

00:58:00.320 Oh, there she is.

00:58:02.660 She's relaxed now.

00:58:11.120 All right.

00:58:16.520 That's all for now.

00:58:17.660 That was your Black Friday special cat episode.

00:58:26.280 And Friday of color.

00:58:33.600 Yes.

00:58:34.200 People of color Friday.

00:58:35.360 Let's go with that.

00:58:39.000 All right.

00:58:39.500 I got nothing else.

00:58:40.460 So I'm going to go.

00:58:41.820 I'll talk to you later.

00:58:43.280 Bye.

00:58:43.720 Bye.

00:59:05.640 Bye.

00:59:06.040 Bye.

00:59:06.280 Bye.

00:59:06.820 Bye.

00:59:07.980 Bye.

00:59:08.880 Bye.

00:59:10.500 Bye.

00:59:10.920 Bye.

00:59:11.040 Bye.

00:59:11.140 Bye.

00:59:12.040 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 26, 2021

Episode 1574 Scott Adams： Today's Live Stream Will Be Exceptional

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript