Episode 1577 Scott Adams: How I Riled Up the Low-Information Binaries and Kamala is on the Roof
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
146.83113
Summary
Dalton Trigg ( ) is back, and better than ever. He talks about the recent vandalism at his house, and what he's going to do about it. He also talks about why he thinks Kamala Harris is a bad idea for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Bam! Wow. Wow. What a morning, and it's just going to get better. Holy cow!
00:00:14.860
I think this is going to be the best time you've ever had in your life, and maybe the best time
00:00:21.060
anybody's ever had in any life ever. We're including past lives. And if you'd like to
00:00:27.720
take it up a level, and I know you do, because that's the kind of people you are. Do you settle
00:00:31.840
for the best day ever? No. That's not good enough. Let's take it up. Take it up a level.
00:00:38.900
All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stye, a canteen, a jug or a flask,
00:00:43.180
a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the
00:00:51.360
unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:57.720
It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now. Watch this. Watch it.
00:01:12.560
Good job on the simultaneous sip. Those of you who only watched, well, some people like to watch.
00:01:19.460
Some people like to get right in there. You know what I mean? You know what I mean? Some people just
00:01:24.500
want to sit in the corner and watch. But that's okay. That's okay. I'm not judging. I'm not judging.
00:01:31.960
Yes, the people who do the simultaneous sip are better than all the other people. No, I did say
00:01:36.320
that. I'm just kidding. Well, you should know, if you're not on the local subscription platform
00:01:46.240
following me, that I'm almost at my 200th micro lesson. These are these little two to four minute
00:01:54.040
lessons where I teach you a life skill that you can actually use forever. And we've got about 200 of
00:02:01.960
them. The one I did yesterday was a micro lesson on persuasion voice. So how to control your voice
00:02:09.480
for maximum persuasion? So that's on locals. Last night, my house got vandalized.
00:02:19.400
Yes, my house got vandalized. Now, I don't know who vandalizes a house that's bristling with video
00:02:28.720
cameras. But it's probably going to turn out to be a bad play. Because I expect that 10 minutes after I
00:02:38.820
get off this call, I'm going to have a license plate and an identification. Let me just caution
00:02:48.120
anybody who wants to screw with my neighborhood. My neighborhood is pretty, we're pretty prepared.
00:02:56.740
So yeah, you can cause some damage to my house. And we don't know exactly if I was targeted or
00:03:04.120
somebody else in the house was, was the target of it. But it's going to cost me some money to fix it.
00:03:10.620
It'll cost me some money. And I will know who did it probably in an hour.
00:03:20.880
All right. So if, if you happen to be watching or know somebody who did that, just know that I'm
00:03:27.840
going to be fucking them up at about sometime before lunch. Just, just know I'm coming for you.
00:03:34.620
I'll have your identification. Probably, probably there's somebody already has it. They're just waiting
00:03:39.120
to tell me. So anyway, just thought I'd tell you that. I don't know if there'll be more as it gets
00:03:45.540
closer to election time. I'm expecting a lot more attacks on me personally. Aren't you?
00:03:52.040
Don't you expect that? There should be a major hit piece developing on me somewhere by now.
00:04:00.040
Because I'm, you know, I have a little bit too much influence. So whoever thinks I'm influencing
00:04:05.180
in the wrong direction is going to be probably looking for some journalist to take me out.
00:04:11.600
But good luck with that. Good luck with that. All right. So the news is there are rumors coming out of
00:04:21.580
Washington and the White House. And I would say these are probably just rumors that Kamala Harris
00:04:28.460
looks so unelectable that they're looking at getting rid of her. But they might do it with
00:04:36.000
a promotion, which would be the most Dilbert way to get rid of a vice president. What, what is the
00:04:41.800
most Dilbert way to get rid of a vice president? If you, if you had to pick one thing, if you're
00:04:47.800
familiar with the Dilbert comic, yeah, you're, she, she might get promoted to the Supreme Court
00:04:53.240
so they could get rid of her. Seriously. Keep in mind that the Supreme Court is, in my opinion,
00:05:05.480
the last credible institution, which doesn't mean I agree with them all the time. But I think,
00:05:11.540
I think a lot of people would have the same opinion. The Supreme Court is our last
00:05:15.180
credible institution, even if you don't like their decisions. You know, at least they're
00:05:20.280
credible. But if you put Kamala Harris on there for what would look like an obvious
00:05:25.460
just getting rid of her reason, I'm not sure that makes the Supreme Court more credible.
00:05:31.400
I think that would make it less credible. You know, I'm not saying because of her qualifications
00:05:38.760
or because of her, you know, leading left or any of that. It's just because if you think
00:05:43.660
she was put there to get rid of her, you're just going to have a whole different idea about
00:05:48.580
the Supreme Court. Oh, that's where you put the losers to get rid of them. I mean, that's
00:05:53.260
not the case, but it would feel like that. Um, I'm going to say that the Supreme Court
00:05:57.660
rumor is false, false. They may have talked about it, but, uh, I'm going to predict that
00:06:04.940
does not happen. Anybody want to challenge that prediction? Kamala Harris will not be named
00:06:10.560
to the Supreme Court. They might be talking about it, but I don't think they can pull the
00:06:15.580
trigger because that would just be so, ugh, right? You wouldn't even know how to put words
00:06:22.920
on that, would you? You would just hear that story and you'd go, ugh, ugh. Like it can't
00:06:30.200
even be described. It's so awful. Anyway, here's some more, uh, weirdness. Uh, Jack Posabek
00:06:39.120
was noting that, uh, the lead prosecutor in the Ghislaine Maxwell case is, uh, James Comey's
00:06:46.160
daughter. Now, have I told you that one of the tells that we live in a simulation is character
00:06:55.380
reuse, not just code reuse, but specifically characters. Let me, let me give you an example
00:07:03.240
of this from my real life. I think I could tell this story. Um, and I can't tell this
00:07:10.080
story. Well, suffice to say a weird coincidence happened in my personal life that it, the same
00:07:15.580
people keep popping up in all kinds of different contexts. So there's one person who popped up
00:07:22.540
in one context who I knew from another context. And it was just a weird coincidence. But what
00:07:29.920
are the odds that like a case of this, um, magnitude would have somebody from the known
00:07:37.000
set of characters on it? I think the answer is usually pretty good because in Washington,
00:07:43.540
isn't every high end lawyer related to a politician or married to one or used to work for one. Yeah.
00:07:52.420
I think in some places, um, you would expect these kinds of coincidence, not really a big
00:07:58.200
coincidence because, uh, the, everybody who goes into law has some kind of connection to
00:08:03.000
somebody important. It seems like anyway, um, I guess the, uh, judge is not going to allow
00:08:10.520
the case to be televised and there's speculation that they're protecting the, the elite pedophiles.
00:08:19.480
I don't think that's why if I had to guess it would be this. Now it could be just a general
00:08:27.240
feeling that they don't want to make a, you know, a spectacle out of the case. That'd be a good enough
00:08:32.160
reason for me. But the other reason might be that a lot of names are going to come up associated with
00:08:38.280
Ghislaine Maxwell and with Epstein and they're not all guilty. You know what I mean? I do genuinely
00:08:45.760
think that he associated with people who are not necessarily doing any crimes. They might've just
00:08:51.460
run into him, didn't know what was going on, you know, interacted with him longer than they should
00:08:56.840
have. Bill Gates, for example, might be one of those. Um, so I would think that a smart judge would
00:09:04.060
want to close the proceedings just because lots of names would come up without a case against them.
00:09:12.180
It's one thing if prosecutors are, have a case, but if names just come up as associates or people
00:09:19.120
they knew or people who traveled with them, I feel that would be deeply unfair in our system of
00:09:25.460
justice. What do you think? Don't you think it would be deeply unfair to start hearing names of people
00:09:30.520
who just were in the circle? Trump. Trump's a good example, right? Clinton, Bill Clinton. I don't
00:09:38.620
have any evidence that they did anything wrong, either one of them, nor do I have evidence that
00:09:42.720
they didn't. I don't have evidence one way or the other, but I don't think that unless you're going to
00:09:47.440
bring a case against them, I don't think we should be hearing these names in some kind of,
00:09:50.620
you know, defamatory way. Well, let's talk about the, uh, Omicron virus, which the World Health
00:09:59.040
Organization knows literally nothing about. This is what they said on their tweet. This is the,
00:10:03.920
the who. We don't yet know whether it is associated with more transmission. Well, that'd be pretty
00:10:09.260
important to know. Um, we don't know if it gives you, uh, risk. We don't know risks of reinfection,
00:10:17.600
risk of evading the vaccines. Basically, we don't know anything about it. So you should be very,
00:10:23.180
very afraid about the thing we don't know anything about, I guess, but they're working urgently
00:10:28.720
to answer those questions. Now, I ask this question because I'm an optimist. Not because
00:10:35.100
it's likely. I'm just an optimist. I'm trying to think of any way that any virus would stop
00:10:45.280
circulating. Because we've talked about this before. For some reason, they just stop. Now,
00:10:52.160
the old thinking was that things stop because you reach some kind of herd immunity. But we know that
00:10:57.920
that's not the case. Like the Spanish flu, I don't think reached herd immunity, but it stopped.
00:11:03.880
So, um, I had speculated, and I'm getting closer to saying this is probably true, that the only way
00:11:11.260
any virus stops is that, uh, it creates its own vaccination. Meaning that a variant eventually comes
00:11:18.400
out that affects people as well or better than the original, but doesn't make them that sick,
00:11:24.640
and then gives them some immunity against the bad one. Um, is there any scientific evidence for that
00:11:31.360
at all? Is that, I can't tell if this is me just spitballing or if there's any science who's said
00:11:41.800
something similar? Uh, well, I know a dead host is useless. Yeah, but that's not exactly the,
00:11:49.300
the answer here. Okay. Well, that's what I think is happening. And one possibility is that this,
00:11:56.640
uh, um, that this is the one. The Omicron might be the vaccination. It might be the end of the
00:12:03.580
pandemic. It could, you know, the, uh, but it's too early to say that because the early reports of,
00:12:10.760
uh, mild symptoms are coming out of, uh, South Africa. Now South, South Africa is part of a
00:12:18.000
continent in which people are way younger, way thinner, way less likely to have any problems at
00:12:24.500
all. So I think that even the regular COVID would have given them the same group of people,
00:12:30.620
mild symptoms. So I don't think we know if Omicron is worse or not too soon to know,
00:12:35.380
but we don't see evidence of people having worse problems from it. So we don't know that it's better,
00:12:44.060
but there's no evidence of it being worse. So that's not quite, you know, that's not quite data.
00:12:53.140
That's short of being data, but I'm feeling like it's time. It just feels, it just feels like this
00:13:03.500
is it. I'm not sure I felt like this before. So I can't tell you that my, my feeling is based on
00:13:10.920
anything that you should believe because it's just a feeling, but I am feeling that this Omicron is
00:13:16.140
going to be a mild one and that it will finish up our herd immunity in its own weird way.
00:13:23.140
Um, I said this on Twitter yesterday and I got almost no pushback on it, which is the story
00:13:29.200
itself. So here's something that I couldn't have said one year ago. Like the public wasn't ready
00:13:36.960
for this. You ready? So I've told you that there, there's some big, big shift in public awareness
00:13:44.360
that's happening. And I'm going to talk about that a little bit more. But the first thing I noticed
00:13:49.120
was this dog that stopped barking for about, I don't know, five years since I started doing,
00:13:57.580
you know, public stuff about politics. For most of those five years, the biggest criticism I got
00:14:03.860
was, oh yeah, we should listen to the cartoonist. Let's not listen to the experts. Oh, we should pay
00:14:11.820
attention to the cartoonist. Sure, cartoon boy, tell us what you're thinking. We'll just stop listening
00:14:19.280
to the scientists and the experts. We'll just listen to the cartoonist.
00:14:26.940
That all stopped. It's all stopped. And I didn't notice it for a while. And it took me a little bit
00:14:36.980
to figure out why. Now I could take, you know, credit for maybe being more credible, but I don't think
00:14:44.520
that's what's happening. I don't think that people's opinion of my credibility has changed, you know,
00:14:50.720
because of my performance. I'd love to think that the world was like that. You know, they could see
00:14:55.880
me doing a good job and then they could say, oh, that one's doing a good job predicting. So we'll give
00:15:01.720
them a little more credibility. No, I don't think that happened. Here's what I think happened. I think it was
00:15:07.600
like Trump beating Hillary Clinton in 2016. Trump never made himself more popular. He simply made
00:15:16.080
her less popular successfully. And remember I predicted that? I said, Trump doesn't need to
00:15:22.180
become more popular. He just has to make her less popular. And then he went out and did that. He did
00:15:26.860
exactly that. So I think what happened is that the experts have so self-immolated that almost anybody
00:15:36.400
seems credible relative to the experts now, because the experts have done such a bad job.
00:15:42.860
At least it looks that way. I would argue that it isn't so bad, but the public impression of the
00:15:49.380
experts is awful right now. So suddenly if you say, well, I heard it from an expert versus I heard it
00:15:56.400
from a cartoonist, they don't sound that different anymore, do they? They should. I mean, they should
00:16:03.940
sound different, but the experts have done such a good job of destroying their own credibility
00:16:09.060
that people just don't say that about me anymore. So that's the first thing.
00:16:15.900
So I did a little experiment on Twitter because I was very curious about many of my critics who
00:16:23.920
seemed to think I had completely different opinions than the ones I actually have. And they were quite
00:16:29.080
adamant in their criticisms of the things I don't think and have never said. And I wondered,
00:16:34.200
where is that coming from? And is this something that happens to everybody? And I just see more of it
00:16:39.500
because I have more of a public profile. And so I did a little experiment to find out,
00:16:46.000
and I think I have the answer. I didn't think I would necessarily get one, but I do.
00:16:49.860
So I want to give you, I'll tell you what happened. So I tweeted, if you're one of my critics,
00:17:00.000
tell me in one clear sentence what you believe is true that you think I don't. You know, just give
00:17:05.940
me the one thing we disagree on. What do you think happened when I asked people to tell me,
00:17:12.560
my critics, the people who are really, really mad at me, to tell me what they disagree with?
00:17:17.220
What do you think happened? Almost none of them disagreed with me. Yeah. No, it wasn't crickets
00:17:29.640
because they had to say something. But I'll give you some of the examples of what... Now,
00:17:35.540
they imagined I was saying things that I didn't, and I'll tell you why they imagined it. There's a
00:17:39.680
very specific reason. The people who think they disagreed with me and that I'm talking crazy
00:17:46.700
almost all were Twitter followers, or people who had seen me on Twitter, but not the live stream.
00:17:55.500
All right? So the people who have seen my live streams had a completely different opinion of me.
00:17:59.480
But on Twitter, the biggest complaint was that I don't seem to take a side.
00:18:03.880
I'm not taking a side. I'm not taking a side. And therefore, or that I seem on both sides of issues.
00:18:13.160
Is that fair? Would you say that that observation is true, based on Twitter anyway, that I seem to be
00:18:20.100
on both sides of issues? That's how it works. Every issue has some positives on one side and some
00:18:29.400
negatives on one side. So if you're not on both sides of every issue, are you even thinking
00:18:34.480
independently? You should at least be able to say, oh, here's a good point on this side.
00:18:39.420
Here's a good point on the other side. Now, on Twitter, I think I'm less likely to state a direct
00:18:45.780
opinion than I am here. I hadn't really thought about it, but I think that's true. So the people on
00:18:51.800
Twitter, I call the under-informed binaries. The binaries are people who see two teams, and they see
00:19:00.000
you saying things that would be good for one team. But wait, now you're saying things that would be good
00:19:04.820
for the other team. So now, Scott, you're being ambiguous. How can you say something good for one team
00:19:11.060
and then also say something good about the other team? That doesn't make any sense. So, Scott, you won't
00:19:17.040
take a side, so therefore you're a weasel. That's what they say. Is that what's happening?
00:19:25.600
And some people say, I'm betting both sides. It's called fence-sitting, some people say. Yeah.
00:19:32.960
I would call it looking at all the issues. I mean, that's what it looks like to me.
00:19:40.600
So the binaries are the people who believe that everything fits into the two buckets.
00:19:44.960
And I never fit into the two buckets. So the binary choice is, don't take the vaccination
00:19:53.440
because it's dangerous, or take the vaccination because it's, you know, good, and, you know,
00:20:00.980
it's more good than bad. Right? Those are the binaries. Cassandra says, you fell for several
00:20:07.100
hoaxes, but yet you won't be able to name any. Watch this. Cassandra, name a hoax I fell for.
00:20:15.700
I'll just wait for you. So on YouTube, name a hoax that I fell for.
00:20:23.620
If you mean the Covington kids for exactly 24 hours, that would be true. But name, if we're
00:20:30.660
talking about the virus, yeah, there won't be anything. Right? So the Covington kids was,
00:20:36.360
yeah, I was fooled by hoax for all of 24 hours. So I copped to that. You fell for the ICL model.
00:20:47.620
No, I didn't. I don't even know what the fuck that is. I'm sure I didn't fall for it.
00:20:51.820
The previously vaccinated poses a far greater risk. No, the science is not growing on that.
00:21:03.880
You're reading crackpots. I'm not ruling it out, but the science is not growing on that. I don't
00:21:11.600
think that's true. So here's what's happening. I think the people on Twitter who don't see me,
00:21:17.000
you know, dealing with the whole issue, they just see me say things like, I'm not sure if the
00:21:23.080
vaccines work, but I took them. Because that doesn't fit into another category, right? I don't
00:21:30.900
know if the vaccines are good or bad. I only know that I decided to take them. Nobody else has that
00:21:37.640
opinion that I know of. Or at least they don't say it in public. Probably lots of people have it.
00:21:41.880
Or how about this? I think lockdowns work and we totally shouldn't do them. Right? It doesn't fit
00:21:49.940
into your box. People say either the lockdowns don't work and we shouldn't do them, or they do
00:21:55.760
work and we should do them. I say they do work, but we shouldn't do them. Let me give you some of
00:22:03.620
the other comments that people believe, I think. These are things that people said about me.
00:22:10.900
You think vaccines work. Is that an accurate description of me? You think vaccines work.
00:22:21.080
All I know is I took them and every expert in every country says that they work. That's what I know.
00:22:27.540
Do you disagree that, you know, let's say 99%. Do you disagree with the fact that 99% say that they do
00:22:36.720
work and that I took it? That's all I know. And I know that there are other people who are serious
00:22:44.340
people, mostly rogue people, but they have credentials. And I acknowledge that they say there could be some
00:22:50.080
big problem. All right. So that's too nuanced, I guess. Somebody says, I strategically avoid stating
00:22:59.260
my position. No, I don't. No, I don't. I just don't always do it on Twitter.
00:23:08.900
You believe it's likely that the VAX compliance close to 100% will make the government remove
00:23:14.820
restrictions. And somebody says there's no chance of that. Yes, I do believe that. And so do all of
00:23:22.140
you. So do all of you. If it'll never happen, right? We don't think it can happen. But imagine if
00:23:29.940
California reached 100% vaccination or 95%, they would lose their argument for continuing to keep
00:23:38.940
things locked down, especially as the therapeutics are coming online. So I believe that if VAX compliance
00:23:47.160
was high, which I don't recommend, I'm not recommending you get them. I'm not recommending
00:23:52.900
you do or don't get a boosters. So I'm not saying what you should do. That's the problem. I'm just
00:23:58.580
saying, predictably, if the government's reason for lockdowns goes away, probably the lockdowns will.
00:24:06.360
Not right away. But we could make it happen. If you got COVID, why would you not try ivermectin?
00:24:13.180
I don't know. I don't know. Why do you think that I disagree with you? I would try it. So can I say that
00:24:21.840
I think it's very unlikely that ivermectin is the solution to COVID? And at the same time, can I say, but if I
00:24:29.940
got COVID, I would take ivermectin right away, because I don't fear the consequences of it hurting
00:24:37.540
me. So I occupy all these weird middle grounds where I can feel both sides, but I don't think
00:24:46.380
either of them have it quite right. Somebody said they've successfully inserted, they being the deep
00:24:54.380
state or somebody, have successfully inserted the narrative of blaming the wave of heart problems
00:24:59.740
on COVID. And the blue pills have taken it hook, line and sinker. And that I'm the canary in the
00:25:06.060
coal mine. So the suggestion is that I'm part of accepting the narrative that the wave of heart
00:25:13.180
heart problems are the COVID and not the vaccination itself. No, no, no, that doesn't describe me at
00:25:21.980
all. What I would say is we don't know. I'm saying that all data is unreliable. There is definitely
00:25:30.300
alarming stories about people dying. Usually those alarming stories turn out to be fake.
00:25:38.860
They're just coincidence or misinterpretation. But I'm not going to tell you that the heart problems
00:25:47.020
from the vaccination are less or more than the COVID risk. I'm just saying that they both have a risk.
00:25:55.640
How in the world would I know which one is bigger? How would I ever know that? All right. Anyway,
00:26:01.780
I could do some more of this. But my favorite one is the abacus. He's a user who sent me a list of
00:26:09.940
tells for being a fascist and says that you should look at how many Scott Adams applies to. So I'm
00:26:18.900
going to read the list of how to know you're a fascist. And I want you to vote in the comments,
00:26:24.340
which of these apply to me? Powerful and continuing nationalism. Yes or no? Does that apply to me?
00:26:34.340
Powerful and continuing nationalism. People are saying no. Really?
00:26:42.660
Definitely yes. Yes. Yes. If this is a tell for being a fascist, absolutely. I have a powerful and
00:26:52.900
continuing sense of nationalism. I'm not apologizing for that. I would call that patriotic. And I would
00:27:03.340
hope that people in other countries feel the same about their country. I hope so. Because I'm sure some
00:27:09.400
of their countries are quite awesome. And they should feel quite proud about it. All right. How about
00:27:14.040
this? The second one is disdain for human rights. Do I display a disdain for human rights?
00:27:20.920
No. How about identification of enemies as a unifying cause? That would be everybody.
00:27:31.360
Right? Is there anybody who doesn't identify the side that's causing them problems? There's
00:27:38.080
nobody who doesn't do that. So yes, I absolutely do this. So, so far, two out of three signs of fascism
00:27:45.780
I perfectly identify with. Supremacy of the military. Well, supremacy, meaning the military
00:27:53.880
runs the country? I'm vehemently opposed to that. But I would like our military to be supreme
00:28:01.660
compared to other militaries. So this one's ambiguous. But I certainly don't want the military
00:28:07.080
running our country. Rampant sexism. Did you know that was part of fascism? I feel like this
00:28:14.400
was just like a woke thing that got added to the list. Rampant sexism. What? What's that
00:28:22.080
got to do with fascism? But do I display rampant sexism? Rampant sexism would be the idea that
00:28:30.680
some genders are superior. Yes, I do. Yes, I do have rampant sexism. I believe that men cannot
00:28:40.160
have babies, for example. Some of you disagree, I know. But I believe that women are superior
00:28:48.000
to men in the production of human life. You know, men are pretty good at their part. But when it comes
00:28:55.540
to actually incubating the baby and producing it, compared to men, women do that way, way better.
00:29:03.100
So I guess I am a rampant sexist because I do think women make babies better than men.
00:29:08.080
How about controlled mass media? Well, I don't control the mass media. So I'm not sure that applies.
00:29:17.520
Obsession with national security. Who isn't? Is there somebody here who doesn't think national
00:29:25.320
security would be really high on the list of things to be concerned about? I cop guilty to that.
00:29:32.900
Religion and government intertwined. Well, I'm not a believer. But I do acknowledge that
00:29:41.120
the United States has intertwined Christianity and government and got a good result, I think.
00:29:49.620
Now, I could criticize lots of elements of that and have. But I wouldn't doubt the fact that religion
00:29:56.780
and government formed not a perfect union, but pretty good. Pretty good.
00:30:06.840
Corporate power protected. Yeah, I want corporate power protected. That's why we have laws.
00:30:13.800
We have laws to protect everybody, including corporations.
00:30:19.680
And corporations, of course, are created for the benefit of the people. It just helps rich people more.
00:30:26.780
But it doesn't hurt other people. Mostly. Labor power suppressed. Have I wanted to suppress any labor power?
00:30:41.500
Disdain for intellectuals and the arts. Well, okay.
00:30:45.880
Disdain for intellectuals and the arts. Guilty. Guilty.
00:30:54.400
Well, obsession is just sort of a, you know, a trigger word.
00:31:01.280
Isn't everybody very interested in crime and punishment? I mean, it's part of the texture of life.
00:31:14.780
Now, I don't run the government, so I think that would matter.
00:31:22.760
Oh, I don't think that's me you're talking about.
00:31:28.580
So, anyway, this list of what it means to be fascism is completely ridiculous.
00:31:33.960
But apparently I do meet quite a few of those things unapologetically.
00:31:40.280
All right, the Waukesha narrative is getting hilarious with CNN.
00:31:47.180
These are two things that CNN has said without being embarrassed, apparently.
00:32:01.380
Marking one week since a car drove through a city Christmas parade,
00:32:04.740
killing six people and injuring scores of others.
00:32:12.620
we'd probably want to know more about that driver.
00:32:17.940
So now we have rogue cars driving through parades and killing people.
00:32:24.620
But no mention of a human involved in the crime, just a car.
00:32:31.360
said that a New York NYPD hate crimes task force
00:32:35.380
is investigating after police say an Asian-American woman
00:32:51.900
You got your cars driving themselves after you.
00:32:54.540
You got your rocks that are just flying through the air on their own.
00:33:02.000
So, of course, what's happening here is that CNN,
00:33:08.740
they would be talking nonstop about that white supremacist,
00:33:37.620
I believe that there is an awakening happening,
00:33:43.120
that are changing the consciousness of the country.
00:33:46.400
Now, I predicted this would happen after Trump,
00:33:52.080
And specifically, we saw that the news is fake.
00:33:58.580
The left thought it was only the news on the right that was fake.
00:34:07.400
that even the news from their own side could be fake.
00:34:10.600
They're more likely to believe the news on the right.
00:34:49.080
and said, wait a minute, is all of the news fake?
00:35:07.020
Here's what else is going on to further wake them up.
00:35:10.600
The Democrats are watching the far left of their own party
00:35:14.040
destroy their chances of ever having political power again.
00:35:18.720
So certainly the moderate Democrats are saying,
00:37:05.920
is viciously mocking the woke people in the show,