Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1577 Scott Adams： How I Riled Up the Low-Information Binaries and Kamala is on the Roof

00:00:00.000 Bam! Wow. Wow. What a morning, and it's just going to get better. Holy cow!

00:00:14.860 I think this is going to be the best time you've ever had in your life, and maybe the best time

00:00:21.060 anybody's ever had in any life ever. We're including past lives. And if you'd like to

00:00:27.720 take it up a level, and I know you do, because that's the kind of people you are. Do you settle

00:00:31.840 for the best day ever? No. That's not good enough. Let's take it up. Take it up a level.

00:00:38.900 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stye, a canteen, a jug or a flask,

00:00:43.180 a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the

00:00:51.360 unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:57.720 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now. Watch this. Watch it.

00:01:06.140 Savor it. Savor it. Good.

00:01:12.560 Good job on the simultaneous sip. Those of you who only watched, well, some people like to watch.

00:01:19.460 Some people like to get right in there. You know what I mean? You know what I mean? Some people just

00:01:24.500 want to sit in the corner and watch. But that's okay. That's okay. I'm not judging. I'm not judging.

00:01:31.960 Yes, the people who do the simultaneous sip are better than all the other people. No, I did say

00:01:36.320 that. I'm just kidding. Well, you should know, if you're not on the local subscription platform

00:01:46.240 following me, that I'm almost at my 200th micro lesson. These are these little two to four minute

00:01:54.040 lessons where I teach you a life skill that you can actually use forever. And we've got about 200 of

00:02:01.960 them. The one I did yesterday was a micro lesson on persuasion voice. So how to control your voice

00:02:09.480 for maximum persuasion? So that's on locals. Last night, my house got vandalized.

00:02:19.400 Yes, my house got vandalized. Now, I don't know who vandalizes a house that's bristling with video

00:02:28.720 cameras. But it's probably going to turn out to be a bad play. Because I expect that 10 minutes after I

00:02:38.820 get off this call, I'm going to have a license plate and an identification. Let me just caution

00:02:48.120 anybody who wants to screw with my neighborhood. My neighborhood is pretty, we're pretty prepared.

00:02:56.740 So yeah, you can cause some damage to my house. And we don't know exactly if I was targeted or

00:03:04.120 somebody else in the house was, was the target of it. But it's going to cost me some money to fix it.

00:03:10.620 It'll cost me some money. And I will know who did it probably in an hour.

00:03:20.880 All right. So if, if you happen to be watching or know somebody who did that, just know that I'm

00:03:27.840 going to be fucking them up at about sometime before lunch. Just, just know I'm coming for you.

00:03:34.620 I'll have your identification. Probably, probably there's somebody already has it. They're just waiting

00:03:39.120 to tell me. So anyway, just thought I'd tell you that. I don't know if there'll be more as it gets

00:03:45.540 closer to election time. I'm expecting a lot more attacks on me personally. Aren't you?

00:03:52.040 Don't you expect that? There should be a major hit piece developing on me somewhere by now.

00:04:00.040 Because I'm, you know, I have a little bit too much influence. So whoever thinks I'm influencing

00:04:05.180 in the wrong direction is going to be probably looking for some journalist to take me out.

00:04:11.600 But good luck with that. Good luck with that. All right. So the news is there are rumors coming out of

00:04:21.580 Washington and the White House. And I would say these are probably just rumors that Kamala Harris

00:04:28.460 looks so unelectable that they're looking at getting rid of her. But they might do it with

00:04:36.000 a promotion, which would be the most Dilbert way to get rid of a vice president. What, what is the

00:04:41.800 most Dilbert way to get rid of a vice president? If you, if you had to pick one thing, if you're

00:04:47.800 familiar with the Dilbert comic, yeah, you're, she, she might get promoted to the Supreme Court 0.96

00:04:53.240 so they could get rid of her. Seriously. Keep in mind that the Supreme Court is, in my opinion, 0.86

00:05:05.480 the last credible institution, which doesn't mean I agree with them all the time. But I think,

00:05:11.540 I think a lot of people would have the same opinion. The Supreme Court is our last

00:05:15.180 credible institution, even if you don't like their decisions. You know, at least they're

00:05:20.280 credible. But if you put Kamala Harris on there for what would look like an obvious 0.99

00:05:25.460 just getting rid of her reason, I'm not sure that makes the Supreme Court more credible.

00:05:31.400 I think that would make it less credible. You know, I'm not saying because of her qualifications

00:05:38.760 or because of her, you know, leading left or any of that. It's just because if you think

00:05:43.660 she was put there to get rid of her, you're just going to have a whole different idea about

00:05:48.580 the Supreme Court. Oh, that's where you put the losers to get rid of them. I mean, that's

00:05:53.260 not the case, but it would feel like that. Um, I'm going to say that the Supreme Court

00:05:57.660 rumor is false, false. They may have talked about it, but, uh, I'm going to predict that

00:06:04.940 does not happen. Anybody want to challenge that prediction? Kamala Harris will not be named

00:06:10.560 to the Supreme Court. They might be talking about it, but I don't think they can pull the

00:06:15.580 trigger because that would just be so, ugh, right? You wouldn't even know how to put words

00:06:22.920 on that, would you? You would just hear that story and you'd go, ugh, ugh. Like it can't

00:06:30.200 even be described. It's so awful. Anyway, here's some more, uh, weirdness. Uh, Jack Posabek

00:06:39.120 was noting that, uh, the lead prosecutor in the Ghislaine Maxwell case is, uh, James Comey's

00:06:46.160 daughter. Now, have I told you that one of the tells that we live in a simulation is character

00:06:55.380 reuse, not just code reuse, but specifically characters. Let me, let me give you an example

00:07:03.240 of this from my real life. I think I could tell this story. Um, and I can't tell this

00:07:10.080 story. Well, suffice to say a weird coincidence happened in my personal life that it, the same

00:07:15.580 people keep popping up in all kinds of different contexts. So there's one person who popped up

00:07:22.540 in one context who I knew from another context. And it was just a weird coincidence. But what

00:07:29.920 are the odds that like a case of this, um, magnitude would have somebody from the known

00:07:37.000 set of characters on it? I think the answer is usually pretty good because in Washington,

00:07:43.540 isn't every high end lawyer related to a politician or married to one or used to work for one. Yeah.

00:07:52.420 I think in some places, um, you would expect these kinds of coincidence, not really a big

00:07:58.200 coincidence because, uh, the, everybody who goes into law has some kind of connection to

00:08:03.000 somebody important. It seems like anyway, um, I guess the, uh, judge is not going to allow

00:08:10.520 the case to be televised and there's speculation that they're protecting the, the elite pedophiles.

00:08:19.480 I don't think that's why if I had to guess it would be this. Now it could be just a general

00:08:27.240 feeling that they don't want to make a, you know, a spectacle out of the case. That'd be a good enough

00:08:32.160 reason for me. But the other reason might be that a lot of names are going to come up associated with

00:08:38.280 Ghislaine Maxwell and with Epstein and they're not all guilty. You know what I mean? I do genuinely

00:08:45.760 think that he associated with people who are not necessarily doing any crimes. They might've just

00:08:51.460 run into him, didn't know what was going on, you know, interacted with him longer than they should

00:08:56.840 have. Bill Gates, for example, might be one of those. Um, so I would think that a smart judge would

00:09:04.060 want to close the proceedings just because lots of names would come up without a case against them.

00:09:12.180 It's one thing if prosecutors are, have a case, but if names just come up as associates or people

00:09:19.120 they knew or people who traveled with them, I feel that would be deeply unfair in our system of

00:09:25.460 justice. What do you think? Don't you think it would be deeply unfair to start hearing names of people

00:09:30.520 who just were in the circle? Trump. Trump's a good example, right? Clinton, Bill Clinton. I don't

00:09:38.620 have any evidence that they did anything wrong, either one of them, nor do I have evidence that

00:09:42.720 they didn't. I don't have evidence one way or the other, but I don't think that unless you're going to

00:09:47.440 bring a case against them, I don't think we should be hearing these names in some kind of,

00:09:50.620 you know, defamatory way. Well, let's talk about the, uh, Omicron virus, which the World Health

00:09:59.040 Organization knows literally nothing about. This is what they said on their tweet. This is the,

00:10:03.920 the who. We don't yet know whether it is associated with more transmission. Well, that'd be pretty

00:10:09.260 important to know. Um, we don't know if it gives you, uh, risk. We don't know risks of reinfection,

00:10:17.600 risk of evading the vaccines. Basically, we don't know anything about it. So you should be very,

00:10:23.180 very afraid about the thing we don't know anything about, I guess, but they're working urgently

00:10:28.720 to answer those questions. Now, I ask this question because I'm an optimist. Not because

00:10:35.100 it's likely. I'm just an optimist. I'm trying to think of any way that any virus would stop

00:10:45.280 circulating. Because we've talked about this before. For some reason, they just stop. Now,

00:10:52.160 the old thinking was that things stop because you reach some kind of herd immunity. But we know that

00:10:57.920 that's not the case. Like the Spanish flu, I don't think reached herd immunity, but it stopped.

00:11:03.880 So, um, I had speculated, and I'm getting closer to saying this is probably true, that the only way

00:11:11.260 any virus stops is that, uh, it creates its own vaccination. Meaning that a variant eventually comes

00:11:18.400 out that affects people as well or better than the original, but doesn't make them that sick,

00:11:24.640 and then gives them some immunity against the bad one. Um, is there any scientific evidence for that

00:11:31.360 at all? Is that, I can't tell if this is me just spitballing or if there's any science who's said

00:11:41.800 something similar? Uh, well, I know a dead host is useless. Yeah, but that's not exactly the,

00:11:49.300 the answer here. Okay. Well, that's what I think is happening. And one possibility is that this,

00:11:56.640 uh, um, that this is the one. The Omicron might be the vaccination. It might be the end of the

00:12:03.580 pandemic. It could, you know, the, uh, but it's too early to say that because the early reports of,

00:12:10.760 uh, mild symptoms are coming out of, uh, South Africa. Now South, South Africa is part of a

00:12:18.000 continent in which people are way younger, way thinner, way less likely to have any problems at

00:12:24.500 all. So I think that even the regular COVID would have given them the same group of people,

00:12:30.620 mild symptoms. So I don't think we know if Omicron is worse or not too soon to know,

00:12:35.380 but we don't see evidence of people having worse problems from it. So we don't know that it's better,

00:12:44.060 but there's no evidence of it being worse. So that's not quite, you know, that's not quite data.

00:12:53.140 That's short of being data, but I'm feeling like it's time. It just feels, it just feels like this

00:13:03.500 is it. I'm not sure I felt like this before. So I can't tell you that my, my feeling is based on

00:13:10.920 anything that you should believe because it's just a feeling, but I am feeling that this Omicron is

00:13:16.140 going to be a mild one and that it will finish up our herd immunity in its own weird way.

00:13:23.140 Um, I said this on Twitter yesterday and I got almost no pushback on it, which is the story

00:13:29.200 itself. So here's something that I couldn't have said one year ago. Like the public wasn't ready

00:13:36.960 for this. You ready? So I've told you that there, there's some big, big shift in public awareness

00:13:44.360 that's happening. And I'm going to talk about that a little bit more. But the first thing I noticed

00:13:49.120 was this dog that stopped barking for about, I don't know, five years since I started doing,

00:13:57.580 you know, public stuff about politics. For most of those five years, the biggest criticism I got

00:14:03.860 was, oh yeah, we should listen to the cartoonist. Let's not listen to the experts. Oh, we should pay

00:14:11.820 attention to the cartoonist. Sure, cartoon boy, tell us what you're thinking. We'll just stop listening

00:14:19.280 to the scientists and the experts. We'll just listen to the cartoonist.

00:14:26.940 That all stopped. It's all stopped. And I didn't notice it for a while. And it took me a little bit

00:14:36.980 to figure out why. Now I could take, you know, credit for maybe being more credible, but I don't think

00:14:44.520 that's what's happening. I don't think that people's opinion of my credibility has changed, you know,

00:14:50.720 because of my performance. I'd love to think that the world was like that. You know, they could see

00:14:55.880 me doing a good job and then they could say, oh, that one's doing a good job predicting. So we'll give

00:15:01.720 them a little more credibility. No, I don't think that happened. Here's what I think happened. I think it was

00:15:07.600 like Trump beating Hillary Clinton in 2016. Trump never made himself more popular. He simply made

00:15:16.080 her less popular successfully. And remember I predicted that? I said, Trump doesn't need to

00:15:22.180 become more popular. He just has to make her less popular. And then he went out and did that. He did

00:15:26.860 exactly that. So I think what happened is that the experts have so self-immolated that almost anybody

00:15:36.400 seems credible relative to the experts now, because the experts have done such a bad job.

00:15:42.860 At least it looks that way. I would argue that it isn't so bad, but the public impression of the

00:15:49.380 experts is awful right now. So suddenly if you say, well, I heard it from an expert versus I heard it

00:15:56.400 from a cartoonist, they don't sound that different anymore, do they? They should. I mean, they should

00:16:03.940 sound different, but the experts have done such a good job of destroying their own credibility

00:16:09.060 that people just don't say that about me anymore. So that's the first thing.

00:16:15.900 So I did a little experiment on Twitter because I was very curious about many of my critics who

00:16:23.920 seemed to think I had completely different opinions than the ones I actually have. And they were quite

00:16:29.080 adamant in their criticisms of the things I don't think and have never said. And I wondered,

00:16:34.200 where is that coming from? And is this something that happens to everybody? And I just see more of it

00:16:39.500 because I have more of a public profile. And so I did a little experiment to find out,

00:16:46.000 and I think I have the answer. I didn't think I would necessarily get one, but I do.

00:16:49.860 So I want to give you, I'll tell you what happened. So I tweeted, if you're one of my critics,

00:17:00.000 tell me in one clear sentence what you believe is true that you think I don't. You know, just give

00:17:05.940 me the one thing we disagree on. What do you think happened when I asked people to tell me,

00:17:12.560 my critics, the people who are really, really mad at me, to tell me what they disagree with?

00:17:17.220 What do you think happened? Almost none of them disagreed with me. Yeah. No, it wasn't crickets

00:17:29.640 because they had to say something. But I'll give you some of the examples of what... Now,

00:17:35.540 they imagined I was saying things that I didn't, and I'll tell you why they imagined it. There's a

00:17:39.680 very specific reason. The people who think they disagreed with me and that I'm talking crazy

00:17:46.700 almost all were Twitter followers, or people who had seen me on Twitter, but not the live stream.

00:17:55.500 All right? So the people who have seen my live streams had a completely different opinion of me.

00:17:59.480 But on Twitter, the biggest complaint was that I don't seem to take a side.

00:18:03.880 I'm not taking a side. I'm not taking a side. And therefore, or that I seem on both sides of issues.

00:18:13.160 Is that fair? Would you say that that observation is true, based on Twitter anyway, that I seem to be

00:18:20.100 on both sides of issues? That's how it works. Every issue has some positives on one side and some

00:18:29.400 negatives on one side. So if you're not on both sides of every issue, are you even thinking

00:18:34.480 independently? You should at least be able to say, oh, here's a good point on this side.

00:18:39.420 Here's a good point on the other side. Now, on Twitter, I think I'm less likely to state a direct

00:18:45.780 opinion than I am here. I hadn't really thought about it, but I think that's true. So the people on

00:18:51.800 Twitter, I call the under-informed binaries. The binaries are people who see two teams, and they see

00:19:00.000 you saying things that would be good for one team. But wait, now you're saying things that would be good

00:19:04.820 for the other team. So now, Scott, you're being ambiguous. How can you say something good for one team

00:19:11.060 and then also say something good about the other team? That doesn't make any sense. So, Scott, you won't

00:19:17.040 take a side, so therefore you're a weasel. That's what they say. Is that what's happening?

00:19:25.600 And some people say, I'm betting both sides. It's called fence-sitting, some people say. Yeah.

00:19:32.960 I would call it looking at all the issues. I mean, that's what it looks like to me.

00:19:40.600 So the binaries are the people who believe that everything fits into the two buckets.

00:19:44.960 And I never fit into the two buckets. So the binary choice is, don't take the vaccination

00:19:53.440 because it's dangerous, or take the vaccination because it's, you know, good, and, you know,

00:20:00.980 it's more good than bad. Right? Those are the binaries. Cassandra says, you fell for several

00:20:07.100 hoaxes, but yet you won't be able to name any. Watch this. Cassandra, name a hoax I fell for. 0.98

00:20:15.700 I'll just wait for you. So on YouTube, name a hoax that I fell for.

00:20:23.620 If you mean the Covington kids for exactly 24 hours, that would be true. But name, if we're

00:20:30.660 talking about the virus, yeah, there won't be anything. Right? So the Covington kids was,

00:20:36.360 yeah, I was fooled by hoax for all of 24 hours. So I copped to that. You fell for the ICL model.

00:20:47.620 No, I didn't. I don't even know what the fuck that is. I'm sure I didn't fall for it.

00:20:51.820 The previously vaccinated poses a far greater risk. No, the science is not growing on that.

00:21:03.880 You're reading crackpots. I'm not ruling it out, but the science is not growing on that. I don't

00:21:11.600 think that's true. So here's what's happening. I think the people on Twitter who don't see me,

00:21:17.000 you know, dealing with the whole issue, they just see me say things like, I'm not sure if the

00:21:23.080 vaccines work, but I took them. Because that doesn't fit into another category, right? I don't

00:21:30.900 know if the vaccines are good or bad. I only know that I decided to take them. Nobody else has that

00:21:37.640 opinion that I know of. Or at least they don't say it in public. Probably lots of people have it.

00:21:41.880 Or how about this? I think lockdowns work and we totally shouldn't do them. Right? It doesn't fit

00:21:49.940 into your box. People say either the lockdowns don't work and we shouldn't do them, or they do

00:21:55.760 work and we should do them. I say they do work, but we shouldn't do them. Let me give you some of

00:22:03.620 the other comments that people believe, I think. These are things that people said about me.

00:22:10.900 You think vaccines work. Is that an accurate description of me? You think vaccines work.

00:22:21.080 All I know is I took them and every expert in every country says that they work. That's what I know.

00:22:27.540 Do you disagree that, you know, let's say 99%. Do you disagree with the fact that 99% say that they do

00:22:36.720 work and that I took it? That's all I know. And I know that there are other people who are serious

00:22:44.340 people, mostly rogue people, but they have credentials. And I acknowledge that they say there could be some

00:22:50.080 big problem. All right. So that's too nuanced, I guess. Somebody says, I strategically avoid stating

00:22:59.260 my position. No, I don't. No, I don't. I just don't always do it on Twitter.

00:23:08.900 You believe it's likely that the VAX compliance close to 100% will make the government remove

00:23:14.820 restrictions. And somebody says there's no chance of that. Yes, I do believe that. And so do all of

00:23:22.140 you. So do all of you. If it'll never happen, right? We don't think it can happen. But imagine if

00:23:29.940 California reached 100% vaccination or 95%, they would lose their argument for continuing to keep

00:23:38.940 things locked down, especially as the therapeutics are coming online. So I believe that if VAX compliance

00:23:47.160 was high, which I don't recommend, I'm not recommending you get them. I'm not recommending

00:23:52.900 you do or don't get a boosters. So I'm not saying what you should do. That's the problem. I'm just

00:23:58.580 saying, predictably, if the government's reason for lockdowns goes away, probably the lockdowns will.

00:24:06.360 Not right away. But we could make it happen. If you got COVID, why would you not try ivermectin?

00:24:13.180 I don't know. I don't know. Why do you think that I disagree with you? I would try it. So can I say that

00:24:21.840 I think it's very unlikely that ivermectin is the solution to COVID? And at the same time, can I say, but if I

00:24:29.940 got COVID, I would take ivermectin right away, because I don't fear the consequences of it hurting

00:24:37.540 me. So I occupy all these weird middle grounds where I can feel both sides, but I don't think

00:24:46.380 either of them have it quite right. Somebody said they've successfully inserted, they being the deep

00:24:54.380 state or somebody, have successfully inserted the narrative of blaming the wave of heart problems

00:24:59.740 on COVID. And the blue pills have taken it hook, line and sinker. And that I'm the canary in the

00:25:06.060 coal mine. So the suggestion is that I'm part of accepting the narrative that the wave of heart

00:25:13.180 heart problems are the COVID and not the vaccination itself. No, no, no, that doesn't describe me at

00:25:21.980 all. What I would say is we don't know. I'm saying that all data is unreliable. There is definitely

00:25:30.300 alarming stories about people dying. Usually those alarming stories turn out to be fake.

00:25:38.860 They're just coincidence or misinterpretation. But I'm not going to tell you that the heart problems

00:25:47.020 from the vaccination are less or more than the COVID risk. I'm just saying that they both have a risk.

00:25:55.640 How in the world would I know which one is bigger? How would I ever know that? All right. Anyway,

00:26:01.780 I could do some more of this. But my favorite one is the abacus. He's a user who sent me a list of

00:26:09.940 tells for being a fascist and says that you should look at how many Scott Adams applies to. So I'm

00:26:18.900 going to read the list of how to know you're a fascist. And I want you to vote in the comments,

00:26:24.340 which of these apply to me? Powerful and continuing nationalism. Yes or no? Does that apply to me?

00:26:34.340 Powerful and continuing nationalism. People are saying no. Really?

00:26:42.660 Definitely yes. Yes. Yes. If this is a tell for being a fascist, absolutely. I have a powerful and

00:26:52.900 continuing sense of nationalism. I'm not apologizing for that. I would call that patriotic. And I would

00:27:03.340 hope that people in other countries feel the same about their country. I hope so. Because I'm sure some

00:27:09.400 of their countries are quite awesome. And they should feel quite proud about it. All right. How about

00:27:14.040 this? The second one is disdain for human rights. Do I display a disdain for human rights?

00:27:20.920 No. How about identification of enemies as a unifying cause? That would be everybody.

00:27:31.360 Right? Is there anybody who doesn't identify the side that's causing them problems? There's

00:27:38.080 nobody who doesn't do that. So yes, I absolutely do this. So, so far, two out of three signs of fascism

00:27:45.780 I perfectly identify with. Supremacy of the military. Well, supremacy, meaning the military

00:27:53.880 runs the country? I'm vehemently opposed to that. But I would like our military to be supreme

00:28:01.660 compared to other militaries. So this one's ambiguous. But I certainly don't want the military

00:28:07.080 running our country. Rampant sexism. Did you know that was part of fascism? I feel like this

00:28:14.400 was just like a woke thing that got added to the list. Rampant sexism. What? What's that 0.99

00:28:22.080 got to do with fascism? But do I display rampant sexism? Rampant sexism would be the idea that 0.99

00:28:30.680 some genders are superior. Yes, I do. Yes, I do have rampant sexism. I believe that men cannot 0.98

00:28:40.160 have babies, for example. Some of you disagree, I know. But I believe that women are superior 1.00

00:28:48.000 to men in the production of human life. You know, men are pretty good at their part. But when it comes

00:28:55.540 to actually incubating the baby and producing it, compared to men, women do that way, way better. 0.83

00:29:03.100 So I guess I am a rampant sexist because I do think women make babies better than men. 1.00

00:29:08.080 How about controlled mass media? Well, I don't control the mass media. So I'm not sure that applies.

00:29:17.520 Obsession with national security. Who isn't? Is there somebody here who doesn't think national

00:29:25.320 security would be really high on the list of things to be concerned about? I cop guilty to that.

00:29:32.900 Religion and government intertwined. Well, I'm not a believer. But I do acknowledge that

00:29:41.120 the United States has intertwined Christianity and government and got a good result, I think.

00:29:49.620 Now, I could criticize lots of elements of that and have. But I wouldn't doubt the fact that religion

00:29:56.780 and government formed not a perfect union, but pretty good. Pretty good.

00:30:06.840 Corporate power protected. Yeah, I want corporate power protected. That's why we have laws. 0.85

00:30:13.800 We have laws to protect everybody, including corporations.

00:30:19.680 And corporations, of course, are created for the benefit of the people. It just helps rich people more.

00:30:26.780 But it doesn't hurt other people. Mostly. Labor power suppressed. Have I wanted to suppress any labor power?

00:30:36.780 I'm pro-union. So I don't know about that.

00:30:41.500 Disdain for intellectuals and the arts. Well, okay.

00:30:45.880 Disdain for intellectuals and the arts. Guilty. Guilty.

00:30:50.320 Disdain for intellectuals and the arts.

00:30:52.320 Obsession with crime and punishment.

00:30:54.400 Well, obsession is just sort of a, you know, a trigger word.

00:31:01.280 Isn't everybody very interested in crime and punishment? I mean, it's part of the texture of life.

00:31:07.720 How about rampant nepotism and corruption?

00:31:10.880 Yes, I have hired relatives.

00:31:13.120 I have, in fact, hired relatives.

00:31:14.780 Now, I don't run the government, so I think that would matter.

00:31:18.180 Corruption, not so much.

00:31:19.880 And then fraudulent elections.

00:31:22.760 Oh, I don't think that's me you're talking about.

00:31:25.820 That might be the Democrats.

00:31:28.580 So, anyway, this list of what it means to be fascism is completely ridiculous.

00:31:33.960 But apparently I do meet quite a few of those things unapologetically.

00:31:40.280 All right, the Waukesha narrative is getting hilarious with CNN.

00:31:47.180 These are two things that CNN has said without being embarrassed, apparently.

00:31:54.460 On CNN, they reported,

00:31:55.900 Waukesha will hold a moment of silence today.

00:31:58.220 This might have been a tweet or a headline.

00:32:00.420 I can't remember.

00:32:01.380 Marking one week since a car drove through a city Christmas parade,

00:32:04.740 killing six people and injuring scores of others.

00:32:07.300 Now, I am mad at that car.

00:32:08.880 If it had had a driver,

00:32:12.620 we'd probably want to know more about that driver.

00:32:15.220 But CNN's reporting it was a car.

00:32:17.940 So now we have rogue cars driving through parades and killing people.

00:32:21.960 And that's a trend I hope doesn't include.

00:32:24.620 But no mention of a human involved in the crime, just a car.

00:32:29.340 Also on CNN,

00:32:31.360 said that a New York NYPD hate crimes task force

00:32:35.380 is investigating after police say an Asian-American woman

00:32:39.560 was attacked with a large rock.

00:32:42.540 So it's worse than just the cars going rogue.

00:32:45.700 Now the rocks are throwing themselves.

00:32:48.760 It's dangerous to go outside.

00:32:50.520 You got your COVID.

00:32:51.900 You got your cars driving themselves after you.

00:32:54.540 You got your rocks that are just flying through the air on their own.

00:32:57.320 It's a dangerous world, people.

00:32:59.820 It's a dangerous world.

00:33:02.000 So, of course, what's happening here is that CNN,

00:33:04.880 if anybody was white like Rittenhouse,

00:33:08.740 they would be talking nonstop about that white supremacist,

00:33:11.880 which he's not.

00:33:13.420 You know, that would be fake news.

00:33:14.880 But that's what they do, and did.

00:33:18.220 But as soon as it's not a white male 0.95

00:33:21.260 who's the alleged perpetrator,

00:33:24.280 well, it's just the car driving itself

00:33:26.600 and the rocks throwing themselves.

00:33:28.380 Because the last thing we're going to do

00:33:30.140 is blame anybody who's not a white male.

00:33:35.880 All right.

00:33:37.620 I believe that there is an awakening happening,

00:33:40.240 and it looks like this.

00:33:41.500 So it's a bunch of things that are happening

00:33:43.120 that are changing the consciousness of the country.

00:33:46.400 Now, I predicted this would happen after Trump,

00:33:49.840 that we would just see reality differently.

00:33:52.080 And specifically, we saw that the news is fake.

00:33:55.600 But mostly, only the right saw that.

00:33:58.580 The left thought it was only the news on the right that was fake.

00:34:03.620 But the right, I think, is a little more aware

00:34:07.400 that even the news from their own side could be fake.

00:34:10.600 They're more likely to believe the news on the right.

00:34:13.440 But they know now it could be made up

00:34:15.360 because they've seen enough examples.

00:34:17.660 But the left is just figuring that out

00:34:20.940 with the Rittenhouse case in particular.

00:34:24.440 And now with the Waukesha story,

00:34:26.760 I'm hearing anecdotally,

00:34:28.900 so we don't have a poll on this,

00:34:30.580 but anecdotally, a lot of Hollywood people,

00:34:34.120 a lot of left-leaning people,

00:34:36.120 and people are sending me tweets,

00:34:38.220 you know, private communications,

00:34:39.940 showing that their leftist friends

00:34:41.500 have gone over to the other side.

00:34:44.300 And they don't say it in public,

00:34:46.420 but a lot of left-leaning people just woke up

00:34:49.080 and said, wait a minute, is all of the news fake?

00:34:52.720 How long has this been going on?

00:34:54.380 Yeah, all of the political news is fake.

00:34:58.340 I don't know about the rest of it,

00:35:00.380 but all of the political news is fake,

00:35:02.120 and it has been for a long time.

00:35:04.120 So the left is figuring that out.

00:35:07.020 Here's what else is going on to further wake them up.

00:35:10.600 The Democrats are watching the far left of their own party

00:35:14.040 destroy their chances of ever having political power again.

00:35:18.720 So certainly the moderate Democrats are saying,

00:35:21.300 wait a minute,

00:35:22.620 why are we associating with this crowd?

00:35:25.380 They're batshit crazy.

00:35:28.000 So they're seeing their own wing being crazy

00:35:30.900 while they always accuse the right

00:35:32.860 of having the crazy wing, which it does.

00:35:35.460 So both sides have crazy wings.

00:35:37.360 I would say both are racist.

00:35:39.960 You know, if you go far enough to the right,

00:35:41.520 you get racist,

00:35:42.900 but most of the right are not.

00:35:45.000 If you go far enough to the left,

00:35:46.640 you get racist,

00:35:47.620 but most of the Democrats are not,

00:35:49.260 you know,

00:35:50.620 not leaning hard in that direction.

00:35:52.420 All right.

00:35:56.860 Hollywood has even turned on the wokeness.

00:35:59.220 I mentioned a series I've been watching

00:36:02.280 called The Sex Lives of College Girls.

00:36:04.980 I know, I know.

00:36:05.880 It sounds like, you know, porn or something.

00:36:08.960 But think of it as,

00:36:10.120 it's basically sex in the city

00:36:11.720 redone with college freshmen.

00:36:15.940 So think of it that way.

00:36:17.080 So it's just the sex in the city model,

00:36:19.980 which is, you know,

00:36:21.300 four or five females,

00:36:24.040 you know, working out their sex lives.

00:36:26.260 So this is just a college setting.

00:36:28.540 Now, Mindy Kaling

00:36:29.480 is one of the producers of this

00:36:33.000 with one other guy, I guess.

00:36:35.780 So Mindy Kaling is behind it, 0.98

00:36:38.460 and that's important

00:36:39.140 because it viciously mocks woke culture.

00:36:44.960 And even one of the main characters

00:36:49.000 is apparently a Trump supporter,

00:36:51.860 but they don't say that.

00:36:53.260 A female Trump supporter.

00:36:56.660 Now, I'm the one saying Trump supporter.

00:36:58.720 The show doesn't say that at all.

00:37:00.440 It just looks like a Republican.

00:37:04.140 But the fact that Hollywood

00:37:05.920 is viciously mocking the woke people in the show,

00:37:10.800 that's different, right?

00:37:12.940 It's now a subject of ridicule.

00:37:18.480 So you've seen Bill Maher turn against it,

00:37:20.420 the wokeness.

00:37:21.680 And now we see a pretty big property

00:37:24.180 with a woman who you would imagine 0.99

00:37:27.200 would be in the woke crowd

00:37:29.820 because she's in Hollywood,

00:37:31.460 person of color, woman.

00:37:33.780 You know, every characteristic

00:37:35.100 that would make you think

00:37:36.200 she'd be the wokest person in Hollywood.

00:37:37.920 And she's producing a show that mocks it. 1.00

00:37:42.400 Now, it could be that

00:37:43.320 that's not necessarily her opinion.

00:37:45.280 She might just be a good artist 0.59

00:37:46.560 who likes to put out content

00:37:48.740 that's provocative

00:37:49.580 and may not match her personal opinions.

00:37:52.520 That's a thing.

00:37:54.000 But just the fact that it's even on at all

00:37:56.600 means something to me.

00:37:59.360 Now, you also have to add in

00:38:00.820 Biden and Harris's approvals

00:38:02.320 are in the toilet.

00:38:03.060 And the Build Back Better thing's looking bad.

00:38:07.000 So Rasmussen had a poll,

00:38:09.120 just came out.

00:38:10.380 51% of likely U.S. voters

00:38:12.320 oppose the Build Back Better bill.

00:38:15.960 Now, 51% isn't, you know,

00:38:18.280 a landslide number.

00:38:20.080 But it certainly tells you

00:38:21.720 that there are more than just Republicans

00:38:23.740 who don't like this thing.

00:38:25.480 I mean, that's clear.

00:38:26.180 So some of the sheen of,

00:38:31.420 you know, Biden will do everything better.

00:38:33.820 Everything the Democrats do

00:38:35.100 is better than Trump.

00:38:36.160 That's all just dissolved now.

00:38:38.640 Then you look at the fact

00:38:39.940 that Trump's policies

00:38:41.080 on a number of areas

00:38:42.260 are just clearly better.

00:38:44.380 The border.

00:38:45.940 You don't think that a solid chunk

00:38:47.920 of Democrats are saying,

00:38:49.760 you know, if I had to be honest,

00:38:52.720 Trump might have been a bastard,

00:38:54.280 but the border was in better shape then.

00:38:58.100 You feel that they're seeing it now

00:39:00.200 a little bit.

00:39:01.240 Likewise with inflation.

00:39:03.920 Likewise with China.

00:39:05.520 Likewise with a lot of other things.

00:39:06.960 Although I would say Biden

00:39:08.260 and the Democrats

00:39:09.580 are not terrible on China.

00:39:11.360 They're not worse than the Republicans.

00:39:13.040 I think they both fell short there.

00:39:17.140 And then, of course,

00:39:18.000 the Rittenhouse case

00:39:18.760 opened a lot of eyes.

00:39:20.260 So Guy Benson tweeted this.

00:39:22.020 He said,

00:39:22.340 three left-leaning friends

00:39:24.340 have independently texted me

00:39:25.820 about this vanishing national story

00:39:28.380 talking about Waukesha.

00:39:30.520 They understand what's happening.

00:39:32.220 In other words,

00:39:32.660 they understand now

00:39:33.620 that the press

00:39:34.920 is making stories disappear

00:39:36.720 if they don't support the Democrats

00:39:38.540 or the narrative, let's say.

00:39:40.720 Now they can see it.

00:39:41.880 But they can't quite bring themselves

00:39:44.680 to flat out and say,

00:39:45.860 it's effed up, one wrote.

00:39:48.760 One wrote.

00:39:49.900 And then two of them can see

00:39:51.840 that they now better understand

00:39:53.200 conservatives' complaints

00:39:54.580 about the media.

00:39:56.860 Here it comes.

00:39:58.700 Or as I like to say,

00:40:00.480 it's happening.

00:40:02.700 It's happening.

00:40:04.340 There is an awareness shift

00:40:06.580 going on that's now,

00:40:08.240 I think, easy to identify.

00:40:09.720 We don't know how far it'll go.

00:40:13.280 We don't know if this is just

00:40:14.520 a minor pushback

00:40:16.180 and then things keep going

00:40:17.320 the way they were.

00:40:19.540 But I've always told you

00:40:20.680 that the slippery slope

00:40:22.240 is not real.

00:40:25.600 Or a better way to say it,

00:40:27.140 I think I've said it poorly,

00:40:28.320 when I say it's not real,

00:40:30.020 that probably is just fighting words.

00:40:32.260 So let me say it less provocatively.

00:40:33.820 A better way to think

00:40:36.960 of the slippery slope.

00:40:38.760 So instead of debunking it,

00:40:40.400 let me upgrade it

00:40:41.420 and get you to a place

00:40:42.320 you can agree, I think.

00:40:44.120 Everything goes in the direction

00:40:46.080 it's going

00:40:46.680 until there's a reason

00:40:48.280 for it to stop.

00:40:50.520 You all agree with that, right?

00:40:52.320 Everything will keep going

00:40:53.460 the way it's going.

00:40:54.400 Everything.

00:40:55.380 Until there's a reason

00:40:56.380 for it to stop.

00:40:58.140 Could be a physical reason,

00:40:59.540 could be psychological, whatever.

00:41:00.920 So the slippery slope

00:41:02.920 doesn't add anything

00:41:03.920 to the basic understanding

00:41:06.600 that everything goes

00:41:07.540 the way it's going

00:41:08.120 until it stops.

00:41:09.540 But if you can't see

00:41:11.960 what would stop something,

00:41:14.140 you say it's a slippery slope

00:41:15.780 because you can't see the stop.

00:41:17.720 But the stop materializes

00:41:20.160 when it's needed.

00:41:22.060 And I think we're seeing it materialize.

00:41:24.440 The woke stuff now, I think,

00:41:27.000 is so widely discredited

00:41:28.860 that you would have no risk

00:41:30.840 at all of mocking it in public.

00:41:33.700 I don't know you could have done that

00:41:35.220 as much even a year ago.

00:41:37.820 You could just say

00:41:38.560 it's a whole bullshit philosophy

00:41:40.240 that's hurting people

00:41:41.540 more than helping.

00:41:42.740 And you could say

00:41:43.440 that the school systems

00:41:44.640 are the systemic racists

00:41:46.620 and you'd like to help.

00:41:49.140 So I feel like things

00:41:50.400 have really, really shifted

00:41:51.720 just in the last,

00:41:53.000 really six months,

00:41:54.020 I think it's accelerated.

00:41:54.880 So this is all anecdotal, right?

00:41:59.020 Unless you have some kind

00:41:59.880 of a scientific reason

00:42:00.920 to think that there's

00:42:01.700 something going on here,

00:42:02.960 you should be a little bit cautious.

00:42:07.160 Oh, it's pronounced

00:42:07.960 Waukesha.

00:42:10.420 Waukesha.

00:42:11.420 So I've been pronouncing it

00:42:12.620 Waukesha.

00:42:14.000 Yeah, remember when they called it

00:42:18.800 political correctness, right?

00:42:22.360 Erica says,

00:42:23.380 I have lots of friends

00:42:24.140 confessing their

00:42:25.080 Democrat hatred

00:42:26.760 privately to me.

00:42:28.960 Yeah.

00:42:31.740 So, yeah,

00:42:33.020 I think the pendulum

00:42:34.740 is a better model

00:42:37.740 than the slippery slope.

00:42:39.180 The slippery slope

00:42:41.400 is like,

00:42:43.060 you know,

00:42:43.380 if you imagine

00:42:44.060 the pendulum,

00:42:44.880 you know,

00:42:45.580 imagine the one

00:42:47.380 that's got the several balls 0.99

00:42:48.680 that are suspended

00:42:49.760 and you take the one ball

00:42:51.460 and you let it swing

00:42:52.340 and it hits the balls

00:42:53.260 and the other one

00:42:53.940 on the other end

00:42:54.420 goes up the same amount

00:42:55.520 and it goes for a while.

00:42:59.240 That feels like

00:43:00.080 a better model

00:43:00.740 than the slippery slope.

00:43:03.000 Meaning that things

00:43:04.000 will go in one direction

00:43:05.360 and then they almost

00:43:06.420 always reverse

00:43:07.260 because,

00:43:09.180 people just get tired

00:43:10.160 of things heading

00:43:10.700 in the same direction

00:43:11.500 or there's a counter

00:43:13.220 that pops up.

00:43:19.480 Greg Gutfeld's show

00:43:20.700 has helped increase

00:43:21.460 the awareness level

00:43:22.380 of the middle third

00:43:23.400 of the public.

00:43:24.300 Well, to the extent

00:43:25.220 that he's pulling in

00:43:26.120 any independence, yes.

00:43:33.520 All right.

00:43:34.420 Now, how many of you see it?

00:43:35.600 Are you seeing this

00:43:38.820 trend in awareness?

00:43:40.520 Are you seeing

00:43:41.220 the complete destruction

00:43:42.400 of the credibility

00:43:43.260 of the press

00:43:44.200 and the professional set

00:43:46.560 in ways that even the left

00:43:49.160 can clearly see now?

00:43:50.480 They can see that their own media

00:43:51.660 has duped them.

00:43:53.340 Now, here's the other tell.

00:43:55.660 It used to be

00:43:56.440 when I called

00:43:57.220 the find people hoax

00:43:58.620 a hoax on Twitter,

00:44:00.300 it would be just filled

00:44:01.760 with people saying,

00:44:02.580 you crazy thing.

00:44:03.860 I saw it with my own eyes,

00:44:05.300 but of course they didn't.

00:44:06.640 They saw the selective edit

00:44:07.960 of it,

00:44:08.460 which reverses its meaning.

00:44:10.500 Now, it used to be

00:44:11.260 that people

00:44:11.800 pushed back on that.

00:44:13.900 Now, I don't know

00:44:14.660 if they all understand

00:44:15.980 it's fake

00:44:16.740 or if they know

00:44:18.880 it could be,

00:44:19.940 so they're not just

00:44:21.300 not joining the fight.

00:44:23.300 So I don't know

00:44:23.820 if I've convinced

00:44:24.640 them it's fake.

00:44:25.940 I've convinced everybody

00:44:27.000 who looked at the transcript.

00:44:28.460 If you look at the transcript,

00:44:29.980 it's obviously fake.

00:44:31.740 But I think people

00:44:35.240 have softened

00:44:36.020 to at least the idea

00:44:37.540 that pretty much

00:44:39.000 everything said about Trump

00:44:40.360 was made up

00:44:42.160 or hyperbole

00:44:43.620 or crazy talk.

00:44:47.780 You know,

00:44:48.080 the one thing

00:44:48.940 that I think is like

00:44:49.720 always completely fair to say

00:44:51.860 is Trump University.

00:44:55.360 I think people

00:44:56.740 sometimes

00:44:57.300 sometimes ask me

00:45:00.880 how I defend

00:45:01.760 Trump University

00:45:02.840 and I say,

00:45:04.740 I don't.

00:45:06.340 I don't.

00:45:07.900 You have any opinion

00:45:09.580 of that you want.

00:45:18.080 I will answer

00:45:21.460 this one text.

00:45:25.360 And that's all.

00:45:32.160 All right.

00:45:32.860 My door freaks out

00:45:33.780 when your alerts go off.

00:45:39.740 The bird was the vandal.

00:45:46.460 Because somebody says

00:45:47.340 gas prices are now so high

00:45:49.680 it is actually cheaper

00:45:51.380 to buy cocaine

00:45:52.280 and run everywhere.

00:45:53.260 I appreciate that.

00:46:01.140 Yeah, you know,

00:46:02.040 I can't defend

00:46:04.200 Trump University,

00:46:05.560 but I'll give you

00:46:06.300 some context.

00:46:07.880 I was in the licensing business

00:46:09.760 for many years

00:46:11.160 with Dilbert.

00:46:12.240 And I can tell you

00:46:13.000 that the person

00:46:13.540 who licenses their name

00:46:15.060 or their character

00:46:15.860 in my case,

00:46:17.100 they don't look at

00:46:18.100 all the operating details

00:46:19.640 of the company

00:46:20.380 that does the licensing.

00:46:21.420 You know,

00:46:22.180 you do a quick check

00:46:23.200 to make sure

00:46:23.900 it's not a complete fraud.

00:46:25.780 But let's say

00:46:26.300 it was somebody you knew.

00:46:28.220 I think he probably

00:46:28.860 worked with somebody

00:46:29.520 you knew.

00:46:30.480 And they said,

00:46:31.400 hey, we'll do this thing.

00:46:32.420 We'll put your name on it.

00:46:34.320 Trust us.

00:46:35.980 So, you know,

00:46:37.560 if he trusted someone

00:46:38.560 he shouldn't have trusted,

00:46:39.980 you should certainly

00:46:40.640 hold that against him.

00:46:41.860 You know,

00:46:42.040 put it in the whole picture.

00:46:43.120 But if you believe,

00:46:47.860 there's no evidence of this,

00:46:49.420 that he knew exactly

00:46:50.440 what was going on

00:46:51.560 and was okay with it,

00:46:52.940 that's not an evidence.

00:46:57.580 Yeah.

00:46:58.440 And I'm definitely licensed

00:47:00.160 to people I wish

00:47:01.560 I had not licensed to

00:47:02.640 after the fact.

00:47:06.940 So you're saying

00:47:07.760 my Dilbert condoms

00:47:08.760 were not a licensed product?

00:47:10.000 Yeah, I'd worry about those.

00:47:18.260 Do you know how many

00:47:19.340 sales gurus

00:47:20.320 call their programs

00:47:21.220 universities?

00:47:23.380 Well, yeah.

00:47:27.360 Did we do

00:47:28.100 Kamala on the Roof?

00:47:29.000 Yes.

00:47:29.620 So, yes,

00:47:30.280 we're talking about

00:47:31.040 Kamala going somewhere.

00:47:32.840 We talked about that.

00:47:34.160 All right.

00:47:34.460 I don't have much else

00:47:35.180 to do

00:47:35.720 to talk about.

00:47:39.220 About this.

00:47:40.380 Look at this comment.

00:47:41.400 You okay with

00:47:42.220 the normalization

00:47:43.040 of pedophilia, Scott?

00:47:44.500 All the capitalism.

00:47:46.100 Why would he even

00:47:46.940 ask that question?

00:47:50.080 Why do you even

00:47:50.780 ask that question?

00:47:53.560 Like,

00:47:53.820 what would even

00:47:54.500 provoke you

00:47:56.560 to ask me

00:47:57.720 if I'm okay

00:47:58.380 with horrible crimes?

00:48:01.120 Why would you

00:48:02.000 even be curious

00:48:02.640 about that?

00:48:03.800 For the record,

00:48:04.880 I'm generally

00:48:05.820 against all

00:48:06.980 horrible crimes.

00:48:07.740 Oh, I haven't

00:48:12.720 watched the Beatles

00:48:13.420 get back to special,

00:48:14.620 but it's on my list.

00:48:17.500 If there's no

00:48:18.180 Supreme Court,

00:48:18.840 how will they

00:48:19.220 get rid of Kamala? 1.00

00:48:20.300 I don't know

00:48:20.700 of any way.

00:48:22.100 Don't know

00:48:22.640 of any way

00:48:23.020 you could do it.

00:48:25.960 You know,

00:48:26.400 I think the,

00:48:27.120 let me tell you

00:48:27.860 what I think

00:48:28.320 the Democrats

00:48:29.120 fear the most.

00:48:31.080 You ready for this?

00:48:32.280 Here's what they

00:48:33.580 fear the most.

00:48:35.720 Biden has to

00:48:36.660 step down early.

00:48:39.980 Kamala Harris

00:48:40.640 takes over.

00:48:42.600 And because she

00:48:43.600 got the top spot

00:48:45.020 the way she did,

00:48:46.900 it makes her

00:48:47.540 automatically

00:48:48.260 the front runner

00:48:49.280 for the nomination.

00:48:52.360 Can you imagine

00:48:52.940 anything that would

00:48:53.660 scare the Democrats

00:48:55.500 more than that?

00:48:56.520 Because that would

00:48:56.980 be a gimme,

00:48:57.700 wouldn't it?

00:48:58.360 That would basically

00:48:59.480 be the elections

00:49:01.120 over, I think.

00:49:02.240 I'm not even sure

00:49:03.020 it matters who

00:49:03.540 she ran against.

00:49:04.480 I think she would

00:49:05.000 lose to everybody.

00:49:13.800 Oh, the Get Back

00:49:14.860 show about the Beatles

00:49:16.900 is good.

00:49:21.880 You can't primary

00:49:23.080 a black woman. 1.00

00:49:24.820 Is that what you're

00:49:25.340 saying?

00:49:26.140 That's in the comments.

00:49:27.360 Yes, you can.

00:49:31.120 All right.

00:49:35.340 I'm just looking

00:49:35.800 at your comments.

00:49:37.920 Yeah, your head

00:49:38.500 would explode.

00:49:41.980 You depend,

00:49:42.920 you attend

00:49:43.880 Dilbert University.

00:49:45.300 Well, you know what?

00:49:45.840 I'm thinking of

00:49:46.500 creating a university.

00:49:48.020 So I told you

00:49:48.760 I have 200 micro

00:49:49.920 lessons now.

00:49:51.500 So I'm thinking

00:49:52.240 of packaging them

00:49:53.660 somehow as,

00:49:55.040 you know,

00:49:55.260 I had this idea

00:49:56.040 of a university

00:49:58.800 that you could

00:49:59.500 attend while

00:50:00.760 you're on the

00:50:01.180 toilet.

00:50:02.520 So the lessons

00:50:03.360 would all be

00:50:03.840 two to four minutes.

00:50:05.260 So you could do it

00:50:05.940 while you're in there

00:50:06.480 anyway.

00:50:07.220 You do one a day,

00:50:09.040 you'll have 365

00:50:10.140 life lessons

00:50:11.760 at the end of the year.

00:50:13.820 Maybe more.

00:50:16.660 So I,

00:50:17.420 and I

00:50:18.980 jokingly called it

00:50:20.600 Turd University

00:50:22.300 because you do it

00:50:23.680 in the bathroom

00:50:24.240 two minutes a day.

00:50:25.060 Are they appropriate

00:50:32.640 for teens?

00:50:33.280 Yes.

00:50:34.100 The micro lessons

00:50:35.080 don't have any profanity

00:50:36.480 and they are all

00:50:37.360 appropriate for teens.

00:50:41.100 Although I am

00:50:42.020 considering adding

00:50:42.820 some content

00:50:43.480 though.

00:50:46.820 I don't know

00:50:47.560 if it would be

00:50:47.920 appropriate for teens.

00:50:49.980 They won't watch it

00:50:50.840 anyway,

00:50:51.160 so I don't want to

00:50:51.560 worry about it.

00:50:52.020 So here's what

00:50:55.060 I'm thinking about.

00:50:55.820 I'm going to turn

00:50:56.340 off YouTube

00:50:56.800 because you guys

00:50:57.840 can't hear this topic.

00:51:00.100 There's something

00:51:00.660 I'm just going to

00:51:01.260 talk to the local

00:51:02.320 subscribers about.

00:51:03.900 Nothing personal.

00:51:05.440 It's just that

00:51:05.940 some things,

00:51:06.780 if they get into

00:51:07.280 the total public

00:51:08.200 domain,

00:51:09.580 they turn into

00:51:10.380 something that

00:51:11.040 they shouldn't be,

00:51:12.080 which is actually

00:51:12.740 the topic of what

00:51:13.520 I'm going to talk to.

00:51:14.560 But the locals

00:51:15.700 people won't do that,

00:51:16.740 which is what's good

00:51:17.440 about the subscription

00:51:18.320 system.

00:51:19.200 So with all due

00:51:19.960 respect,

00:51:20.420 YouTube people,

00:51:22.260 I will talk to

00:51:22.840 you tomorrow.

00:51:24.240 And locals

00:51:25.060 people,

00:51:25.740 hang on.

00:51:26.220 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 29, 2021

Episode 1577 Scott Adams： How I Riled Up the Low-Information Binaries and Kamala is on the Roof

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript