Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1585 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Crooks and Idiots Running the World

00:00:00.400 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that ever happened to you.

00:00:04.880 Yep, coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of your life and every other life on this planet.

00:00:10.660 It's that good.

00:00:12.120 And today is going to be a burner.

00:00:14.200 A burner, I tell you.

00:00:15.960 It's going to light your hair on fire and activate all of your senses in a good way.

00:00:22.440 But before we do that, let's have a thing I like to call the simultaneous sip.

00:00:26.880 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stein, a candy jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:33.940 Filling with your favorite liquid I like, coffee.

00:00:37.500 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, including your vitamin D.

00:00:47.380 I don't know that there's any science behind that, but I feel like it's true, and that's good enough.

00:00:52.320 Go.

00:00:52.600 Go.

00:00:56.880 Ah, yeah, that's the stuff.

00:01:00.240 That's the good stuff right there.

00:01:01.800 Well, did you see that Devin Nunes will be the CEO of, I guess, Trump's platform that he's creating, Truth?

00:01:13.540 Is it Truth something?

00:01:16.080 And that'll be fun.

00:01:19.340 So that's a pretty serious CEO.

00:01:21.780 But I worry that it will become just a conservative platform, and then we'll never get to talk to each other again.

00:01:28.200 You know, there's a lot of pressure I get to, you know, leave the traditional platforms and go to the alternative platforms.

00:01:38.300 Now, except for locals, which is a special case, I'm not sure I want to go where there are only conservatives or only people on the left.

00:01:48.780 That feels like working in the wrong direction, really.

00:01:53.440 Now, I suppose if you get canceled, it's the only choice you have.

00:01:56.500 But I'd rather have some chance of talking to people who disagree with me instead of just talking to people who agree with me.

00:02:06.840 Well, the golden age is here, and I will give you a few different examples of it.

00:02:11.900 Number one, the Omicron virus.

00:02:16.740 It's too early to say this for sure.

00:02:19.920 I'm just feeling good.

00:02:22.620 So the Omicron has now hit my state, California.

00:02:26.460 We've got a few identified cases in the south.

00:02:29.300 And by the way, a number of people asked, how do we know what variant it is?

00:02:33.700 Because as people who do testing for a living point out, we don't test for that.

00:02:40.740 You know, if you go in to get a COVID test, nobody's checking your variant.

00:02:44.300 So I assume it has to be some kind of a DNA analysis.

00:02:47.160 And then I ask myself, how do they know who to check?

00:02:52.240 How do they do that?

00:02:53.260 Is it some kind of representative sample?

00:02:56.240 They must do some kind of representative sample.

00:02:58.380 But then how do they know there are exactly two people who have the variant?

00:03:03.060 If you did a representative sample, you wouldn't necessarily know, would you?

00:03:08.160 I guess you don't mix these samples.

00:03:11.240 So yeah, I guess you would know.

00:03:13.380 It's a narrative sample, somebody says.

00:03:15.820 Well, I want that sweet, sweet Omicron to come my way,

00:03:19.240 because apparently there are no reports of deaths or even hospitalizations.

00:03:25.000 Did you hear what I just said?

00:03:26.520 Well, apparently there are no cases of hospitalization or deaths with the Omicron.

00:03:33.940 That doesn't mean it's not happening,

00:03:36.200 because it's a little too early to get all the way excited about it.

00:03:42.360 But I'm a little bit excited.

00:03:44.600 It's premature.

00:03:46.160 It could turn out to be just a big nothing.

00:03:48.820 Maybe it doesn't give you any immunity against the other variants.

00:03:51.700 Who knows? Anything's possible.

00:03:53.100 But at the moment, I choose optimism.

00:03:56.520 And I think this sweet, sweet Omicron, if I could get it, I would infect myself tomorrow.

00:04:02.360 If I had a choice between a third booster, or, you know, the booster shot, or the Omicron,

00:04:09.640 which one's a better bet?

00:04:13.120 Would you rather have a booster or the Omicron?

00:04:16.540 Well, we don't know, right?

00:04:19.840 The last thing you want to do is listen to health advice from a cartoonist,

00:04:23.760 and then go get yourself infected and die. 0.80

00:04:26.840 Don't do that.

00:04:28.560 But I'm telling you, we might be on the verge of something really good here with this Omicron.

00:04:33.740 Let me tell you about an investment method that I sometimes use with mixed results.

00:04:42.660 Don't be like me.

00:04:44.260 Don't follow my medical advice, and definitely don't follow my financial advice, okay?

00:04:48.920 Got that.

00:04:50.020 These are just things to talk about, not things to recommend.

00:04:52.580 But one of my gambling methods that I've been trying out is betting against the news.

00:05:00.300 Meaning that if the news says something is terrible and we're all going to die,

00:05:05.200 I bet against that.

00:05:06.400 If I can find a way to buy a stock, that would be the bet against the news.

00:05:10.620 So when the Omicron variant came out, I bet against it by buying stock in Wynn, the casino, hotel.

00:05:23.280 So the Wynn is a high-quality hotel-casino property that got beaten up by the pandemic.

00:05:30.820 And when the Omicron news came, it dipped again.

00:05:34.560 And I said to myself, you know, the news is usually wrong.

00:05:40.620 So that was my whole bet.

00:05:42.920 My whole bet is the news is usually wrong.

00:05:45.820 And it was worried about the Omicron, so I said, they're usually wrong.

00:05:50.040 So I'll just bet against it.

00:05:51.480 So I bought Wynn stock.

00:05:53.020 As of yesterday, it was up.

00:05:55.040 Let's see if it's a bad idea as of today.

00:05:58.900 Let's see what's happening today.

00:06:00.460 It might be too early.

00:06:02.800 Where is it?

00:06:04.280 Where the hell is it?

00:06:06.200 Up another 3.8% today.

00:06:08.300 So that would be up about 7% or 9% since I bought it just, you know, the other day.

00:06:15.540 So don't do what I do because I also bought years ago stock in...

00:06:22.520 What was the company that did the Gulf disaster?

00:06:27.440 Was that...

00:06:29.300 Which oil company?

00:06:31.600 Oh, BP, yeah.

00:06:32.700 So BP did that.

00:06:34.200 So when BP was totally beaten down, I bought that stock.

00:06:38.380 Same purpose.

00:06:39.860 I was betting against the news because the news was saying it's the worst disaster, blah, blah, blah.

00:06:45.100 It'll take years to get better.

00:06:46.800 Now here, I was right, but I was a little bit wrong, meaning that I bet against the news

00:06:54.200 that it would be an ecological disaster of epic proportions.

00:06:59.860 I bet that it would be less of a disaster than the news was reporting.

00:07:05.960 Was I right?

00:07:07.820 Apparently.

00:07:08.780 Apparently.

00:07:09.480 They figured out how to minimize it.

00:07:11.780 Stuff didn't die as much as they thought.

00:07:14.060 So it turned out to be way less of a problem than the news predicted.

00:07:19.400 So I correctly predicted that the news would be wrong, but the stock was a dog.

00:07:27.940 So in terms of a trading method, it didn't work.

00:07:31.800 So it may work with the win purchase.

00:07:35.560 It didn't work with BP.

00:07:37.780 So don't take my advice.

00:07:40.220 But if you tried to do this, you need a portfolio.

00:07:43.520 Meaning, don't do it with one stock.

00:07:45.900 That's just gambling.

00:07:47.600 But if you had a philosophy you wanted to check with smallish enough money that you could buy,

00:07:53.200 you know, say three to five stocks that fell into that category where you're betting against the news,

00:08:00.260 I bet you'd do all right over time.

00:08:02.260 I bet you'd do all right.

00:08:04.080 Yeah.

00:08:06.160 But again, don't follow that because that's an unproven technique.

00:08:09.500 Now, Elon Musk has said that the Neuralink chips, that they actually dig a little bit out of your skull, I believe,

00:08:19.120 put the chip into your skull and, I don't know, patch it up somehow.

00:08:23.380 And they're going to use it first for quadriplegics.

00:08:26.920 So the quadriplegics, in theory, would be able to think what they wanted, 0.96

00:08:33.220 and then devices that could read the Neuralink connection, apparently, would respond.

00:08:39.960 So in other words, if you had no arms and no legs, you could still turn on your television and change the channels.

00:08:45.900 That sort of thing.

00:08:47.960 To which I said, we have reached the age of magic.

00:08:53.240 This is the age of magic.

00:08:55.560 Where if somebody came to our planet and observed us, let's say 10 years,

00:08:59.980 they would see us just walking into a room and the lights come on.

00:09:03.980 They'd see that the TV would come on to the channel we wanted just because we looked at it.

00:09:08.220 Everything around us will respond to our thoughts in 10 years.

00:09:14.400 Our thoughts.

00:09:16.380 Just try to process that.

00:09:19.380 That the technology already exists to control your environment with your thoughts.

00:09:26.360 Now, we don't know if it's safe yet.

00:09:28.180 That's part of the whole FDA approval process and everything else.

00:09:32.060 So we could have some surprises, but it looks like we're going to control our environment with our thoughts.

00:09:42.240 Now, imagine the military application.

00:09:45.500 Could you imagine, because I feel like this could happen,

00:09:51.600 that a military person who has the chip could simply look at a, let's say, a tank and call in a strike.

00:10:03.440 Just look at it.

00:10:04.580 Just look at the tank and say, die.

00:10:07.020 And a missile comes in from somewhere and just keys on where he's looking.

00:10:15.580 Literally figures out, you know, triangulates from the two eyes and figures out exactly where that is and then destroys it.

00:10:24.360 I think that's going to happen.

00:10:25.540 So all kinds of fun things that Elon Musk has planned for society, we shall see.

00:10:33.860 So you heard that Don Lemon was apparently texting with Jussie Smollett at about the time of the attacks.

00:10:40.880 A number of times they were talking to each other.

00:10:45.860 But it makes you wonder what they were talking about.

00:10:48.820 Because, have you noticed that, first of all, they're basically the same person, but one has a beard?

00:10:58.440 Has anybody noticed that yet?

00:11:01.040 They're pretty much the same person, but one has a beard.

00:11:05.880 What is Jussie Smollett most famous for?

00:11:10.100 A hoax.

00:11:11.780 What is Don Lemon most famous for?

00:11:15.860 Oh, hoaxes.

00:11:17.380 Turns out they have a lot in common.

00:11:20.680 So I wonder if they have some kind of a support group for hoaxers who have been caught.

00:11:27.360 Now, Don Lemon still has his job, which is weird.

00:11:31.740 If I had to bet who was going to go first, Don Lemon or Chris Cuomo, I would have bet Lemon.

00:11:38.400 He already had, you know, allegations against him that look pretty bad.

00:11:42.120 But he's hanging in there.

00:11:43.260 So the two hoax twins, the hoax brothers, Don Lemon and Jussie, I guess they're buddies.

00:11:51.240 Have you ever noticed that whenever science comes up with a new cool drug to fix something,

00:11:59.320 the side effect is always, but you can't have sex. 0.71

00:12:02.520 It's like, we have this chemical that will help you regrow hair, man, but it's going to ruin your ability to have sex.

00:12:13.020 We can make that pain go away, but you're not going to be able to have sex.

00:12:18.120 You know that skin problem you've got?

00:12:22.120 We've got a cure for that, but you won't be able to have sex. 0.99

00:12:27.600 I'm right, right?

00:12:28.320 It's like every drug makes you unable to have sex until the golden age.

00:12:33.800 What does the golden age look like?

00:12:35.640 Well, it looks like this.

00:12:36.680 Apparently, people who are on Viagra, or the generic Viagra, is linked to an almost 70% lower risk of Alzheimer's.

00:12:51.280 That's pretty good, 70%.

00:12:53.420 Now, they don't know yet if it's a cause, or just correlated,

00:12:56.720 but there's a strong suggestion that it might be causal,

00:13:01.480 which brings us to the following possibility in the near term,

00:13:07.300 that we're going to have a lot of 80-year-old citizens.

00:13:10.860 They're 80 years old, and because they're on the Viagra,

00:13:14.860 they don't have the Alzheimer's, so their minds are perfectly clear,

00:13:18.380 and they're hard as rocks.

00:13:23.000 And absolutely nobody in the world will want to have sex with them. 0.92

00:13:26.720 Which they will clearly understand, because their minds will be so clear,

00:13:32.000 and their boners will be so raging, 0.71

00:13:34.820 that they will be in this torturous entity,

00:13:38.480 kind of a living hell,

00:13:40.420 where all you want to do is have sex, 0.69

00:13:43.860 but nobody wants to have it with you.

00:13:47.080 So, good and the bad.

00:13:49.680 Good and the bad.

00:13:51.460 Well, there's a Rasmussen poll on Kamala Harris.

00:13:54.120 See how popular she is.

00:13:56.740 And here are the results.

00:13:57.700 19% said, very favorable.

00:14:00.920 That's right.

00:14:01.900 19% have looked at Kamala Harris' performance

00:14:05.220 and said to themselves,

00:14:07.100 I need more of that.

00:14:09.260 I need more of that.

00:14:11.740 And 4% said they don't know,

00:14:14.900 which seems roughly the same number of American citizens

00:14:18.460 who wouldn't be able to name the vice president if he asked.

00:14:22.200 So, who's the vice president of the United States?

00:14:27.740 Dan Coyle?

00:14:29.260 I don't know.

00:14:30.520 So, if you were to add together

00:14:32.340 the very favorable with the 4% who don't know who the vice president is,

00:14:39.060 you'd get about 23%.

00:14:41.200 23%.

00:14:44.760 That's just about the 25% that get every poll number wrong

00:14:49.440 or every poll question wrong.

00:14:52.120 50% have a very unfavorable opinion of the vice president.

00:14:56.460 Very unfavorable.

00:14:57.380 So, the favorables,

00:15:00.260 if you add together the favorite categories,

00:15:02.180 it'd be 39% favorable

00:15:04.040 with 57% that are leaning unfavorable.

00:15:08.960 That's not even close.

00:15:11.080 Not even close.

00:15:11.940 All right, here's my advice.

00:15:15.340 I've given you this before,

00:15:16.640 but I feel it's necessary.

00:15:18.880 That whenever you see rogue doctors,

00:15:22.120 the ones who are disagreeing with the mainstream advice,

00:15:26.900 I give them a 5% chance of being right,

00:15:30.200 regardless of the topic.

00:15:32.780 Right?

00:15:33.420 So, if the topic is who knows what,

00:15:36.280 it doesn't matter,

00:15:37.080 and it could be scientists or medical professionals,

00:15:40.160 but the rogues who disagree with the mainstream,

00:15:44.200 on average,

00:15:45.440 and this is a life experience thing,

00:15:47.280 this is not based on some data

00:15:48.760 that you could ask me for,

00:15:50.480 just my observation.

00:15:52.560 Of all the people I've seen as the rogues,

00:15:55.900 I'd say they're right about 5% of the time.

00:15:59.000 Why 5?

00:15:59.840 I mean, I'm making up numbers.

00:16:02.200 I mean, you can say 10%, whatever,

00:16:04.380 but it's a low number.

00:16:06.580 So, if the only thing you knew

00:16:08.640 is that the mainstream whatever believed X,

00:16:12.320 and there was a rogue doctor,

00:16:14.580 or even several,

00:16:15.820 even several rogue doctors,

00:16:17.480 and they have a different opinion,

00:16:19.700 there's about a 95% chance they're wrong.

00:16:23.120 Now, why do you think it's higher?

00:16:26.340 What would make you think

00:16:27.580 that the rogues,

00:16:29.360 the ones who disagree,

00:16:30.820 why would you think

00:16:31.800 that they're right more than 5%?

00:16:34.060 Maybe they are,

00:16:34.760 but why would you think that?

00:16:37.100 What would be your evidence

00:16:38.800 to suggest that the rogues

00:16:41.540 would be right,

00:16:43.440 and then what percentage higher than 5%?

00:16:47.020 Because clocks are right twice a day,

00:16:49.840 censorship of competing narrative,

00:16:54.060 contrarian investing

00:16:56.940 is the same as rogue doctors?

00:16:58.460 No, that's an analogy,

00:17:00.180 and analogies are not part of reason.

00:17:01.780 Facts,

00:17:06.860 are you a rogue?

00:17:10.440 I am a rogue.

00:17:12.040 So, here's how you can tell

00:17:13.100 the difference between

00:17:14.100 the rogues

00:17:16.700 and the people

00:17:18.100 who are just right

00:17:18.940 more often than not.

00:17:20.740 Track record.

00:17:22.180 The first time I predicted

00:17:23.700 that Trump would win

00:17:25.320 the election in 2016,

00:17:26.860 should you have believed me?

00:17:28.020 I wouldn't have.

00:17:32.620 Because you didn't know

00:17:33.420 anything about me, right?

00:17:35.240 I gave you my argument.

00:17:36.620 I told you why

00:17:37.320 I thought he'd win.

00:17:38.400 But should you have believed me?

00:17:41.040 I don't think so.

00:17:42.420 I mean, not in the beginning.

00:17:43.820 Should you believe me now

00:17:44.940 if I make a prediction?

00:17:46.540 Well, not believe me,

00:17:48.100 because a prediction

00:17:48.760 is just statistical

00:17:50.080 sort of thing.

00:17:51.260 But would I be more credible now

00:17:53.280 that you've watched

00:17:54.840 my track record

00:17:55.880 of predicting

00:17:57.280 the hard to predict?

00:17:59.100 I would say

00:17:59.640 that my track record

00:18:00.420 is the best I've ever seen.

00:18:02.440 I can't think of anybody

00:18:03.300 who's even close.

00:18:04.660 So, if you look at somebody

00:18:05.700 who consistently

00:18:06.660 is a rogue

00:18:08.660 and gets it right,

00:18:10.640 then that would be

00:18:11.200 a special case.

00:18:12.740 If you don't know anything

00:18:14.160 about the doctor

00:18:15.120 the same way

00:18:16.180 you wouldn't have known

00:18:16.820 anything about me

00:18:17.620 the first year you saw me,

00:18:20.720 why would you bet

00:18:21.680 on somebody like me?

00:18:24.200 Like, even if I have

00:18:26.360 a good argument.

00:18:28.140 It's a bad bat.

00:18:30.100 But sometimes

00:18:30.800 the 5% comes through.

00:18:33.240 The reason that you think

00:18:34.380 the rogues are likely

00:18:36.180 to be right,

00:18:37.840 or even if you give them

00:18:39.420 great credibility,

00:18:41.060 is because they get

00:18:42.160 a lot of attention.

00:18:43.960 And you remember

00:18:44.820 the times that the rogues

00:18:46.360 were right.

00:18:48.340 Right?

00:18:49.140 If somebody disagrees

00:18:51.080 with the mainstream

00:18:51.720 and they turn out

00:18:52.420 to be wrong,

00:18:53.040 well, you just never

00:18:54.080 hear of them again.

00:18:55.620 But if they turn out

00:18:56.480 to be right,

00:18:57.180 they're celebrated,

00:18:58.200 you know, geniuses

00:18:59.460 that got everything right.

00:19:01.300 So, of course,

00:19:02.640 your impression

00:19:04.060 of how correct

00:19:05.280 the rogue doctors are

00:19:07.660 is probably really,

00:19:09.560 really exaggerated

00:19:10.420 by observation.

00:19:13.100 Meaning that you see

00:19:14.760 the rogues being right

00:19:15.880 way more than they are

00:19:16.940 normally right.

00:19:19.480 All right.

00:19:19.680 So, I can't support

00:19:21.340 my 5% number.

00:19:22.680 I'm just saying

00:19:23.140 it's experiential.

00:19:24.940 But if you have

00:19:25.720 a high confidence

00:19:27.540 in the people,

00:19:28.860 let's say more than 50%,

00:19:30.260 if your confidence

00:19:32.000 in the rogue doctors

00:19:33.280 is more than 50%,

00:19:34.620 I would say

00:19:35.500 that's not supportable

00:19:36.600 based on any experience

00:19:39.240 you've had

00:19:39.820 and any experience

00:19:41.220 I've had.

00:19:41.920 It's just not supportable.

00:19:43.440 But, does that mean

00:19:44.540 the rogue doctors

00:19:45.660 are wrong?

00:19:46.500 No.

00:19:47.700 No.

00:19:49.100 No, no, no.

00:19:50.540 They could be totally right.

00:19:52.500 Sometimes they're right.

00:19:53.620 About 5%

00:19:54.320 in my experience.

00:19:56.640 So, just keep that in mind.

00:19:58.300 And you don't have to use

00:19:59.280 my estimate of 5%.

00:20:01.020 Use your own.

00:20:02.940 But that's just the way

00:20:03.720 you should think of it.

00:20:05.300 Because you can't really

00:20:06.400 untangle what these experts say

00:20:08.040 compared to what

00:20:09.120 the other experts say.

00:20:10.140 We're not smart enough

00:20:11.140 to do that.

00:20:12.500 So, just know that.

00:20:14.360 So, I was seeing some videos

00:20:16.400 of the so-called

00:20:18.100 Australian penal colonies

00:20:19.680 for COVID people

00:20:21.540 where they have to go to them

00:20:22.620 and stay there for,

00:20:25.840 is it two weeks?

00:20:26.820 Can somebody give me...

00:20:28.460 I asked that question

00:20:29.340 on Twitter

00:20:29.780 and then somebody thought

00:20:30.700 I was in favor

00:20:31.380 of penal colonies.

00:20:33.500 But it's two weeks,

00:20:34.420 14 days, yeah.

00:20:35.680 So, how many of you

00:20:36.640 have seen the video

00:20:37.880 of what they look like

00:20:39.360 on the inside?

00:20:40.700 So, everybody gets

00:20:42.260 a private,

00:20:43.840 sort of a little

00:20:44.620 private cabin-y thing.

00:20:47.140 I think they have

00:20:47.980 their own bathroom.

00:20:48.800 They should, right?

00:20:49.560 They're trying to

00:20:50.200 keep them away from people.

00:20:52.860 And it's basically

00:20:54.600 a cheap hotel room,

00:20:56.480 it looks like.

00:20:58.080 Wouldn't you say?

00:20:59.700 Now, here's my question.

00:21:03.680 How many people

00:21:04.540 would be happier

00:21:05.660 going there for two weeks

00:21:06.940 than their normal life?

00:21:08.140 What do you think?

00:21:11.700 Because,

00:21:12.980 is there anybody

00:21:14.740 who just works

00:21:15.380 all the time?

00:21:17.400 A lot of us work

00:21:18.500 basically from

00:21:19.920 God-awful morning

00:21:21.460 till God-awful night, right?

00:21:23.920 Aren't there a lot of you

00:21:24.900 who work

00:21:25.880 from the moment

00:21:27.140 you get up

00:21:27.880 to the time

00:21:28.660 you flop in bed

00:21:29.720 and exhausted?

00:21:31.680 That's a lot of us, right?

00:21:33.420 A lot of us do that

00:21:34.540 because you're working,

00:21:35.340 then there's kids

00:21:36.000 or there's other

00:21:36.720 responsibilities.

00:21:38.640 How many of you

00:21:39.800 would say to yourself,

00:21:40.700 and I want to be

00:21:42.520 really clear,

00:21:43.260 I'm not supporting

00:21:44.220 these Australian

00:21:46.400 penal colonies.

00:21:47.800 I'm simply curious.

00:21:49.900 This is just curiosity.

00:21:51.620 I'm not promoting them.

00:21:53.120 I'm not promoting

00:21:53.900 the vaccination.

00:21:55.480 You know,

00:21:55.680 we're just talking here.

00:21:57.080 But how many of you

00:21:58.000 would say to yourself,

00:21:58.820 I could take two weeks

00:22:00.440 in that cabin

00:22:01.200 and if I had my phone

00:22:03.080 and some entertainment,

00:22:05.520 I think I could take

00:22:06.920 two weeks in that cabin.

00:22:10.180 Now, most of you

00:22:11.120 would say,

00:22:11.500 hell no,

00:22:11.880 of course.

00:22:12.680 But is there anybody here

00:22:13.940 who would say,

00:22:15.000 yeah,

00:22:15.240 I could do that?

00:22:18.520 So I'm seeing people

00:22:19.740 say yes.

00:22:21.420 Now,

00:22:21.800 I would assume

00:22:22.280 most of you

00:22:24.140 would say no

00:22:24.780 and most of you

00:22:26.160 would want to

00:22:26.600 shut it down,

00:22:27.180 right?

00:22:28.220 And I appreciate

00:22:29.240 that opinion.

00:22:30.980 I do appreciate that.

00:22:32.720 But,

00:22:33.840 those of you

00:22:34.760 who are sure

00:22:35.520 that they've created

00:22:36.340 a hellscape,

00:22:38.100 I doubt it.

00:22:39.400 I doubt it.

00:22:40.860 I think it's

00:22:41.600 an inconvenience

00:22:42.580 that most of you

00:22:44.280 wouldn't want

00:22:44.980 and you're worried

00:22:45.980 that it will turn

00:22:46.620 into something bigger,

00:22:48.120 of course.

00:22:49.580 But I think

00:22:50.280 this story

00:22:50.740 is way overblown.

00:22:52.760 Now,

00:22:53.840 just to be clear,

00:22:55.620 I don't favor it

00:22:56.680 and I don't favor

00:22:57.880 mandates in general.

00:22:59.660 So,

00:23:00.240 I'm not in favor of it

00:23:01.380 but I think

00:23:02.680 the story

00:23:03.440 of how bad it is

00:23:04.560 is greatly exaggerated.

00:23:06.680 But,

00:23:07.160 having said that,

00:23:08.200 it would be terrible

00:23:08.960 for some individuals

00:23:10.060 and other people

00:23:11.920 would just go in there

00:23:12.700 and say,

00:23:13.020 two weeks

00:23:14.080 without working,

00:23:15.220 two weeks

00:23:15.620 without my family,

00:23:17.060 I could do that.

00:23:20.080 Somebody said

00:23:20.720 it's a porn addicts

00:23:22.480 four seasons resort.

00:23:26.900 That's pretty funny.

00:23:33.840 Who's messaging me?

00:23:35.940 All right.

00:23:38.860 Drake,

00:23:40.100 the artist Drake

00:23:41.360 has withdrawn

00:23:42.160 his 2021 Grammy nomination.

00:23:45.120 He had two nominations

00:23:46.180 for, I think,

00:23:46.860 Best Album,

00:23:47.620 Rap Album

00:23:48.200 and Best Performer

00:23:50.000 and he withdrew.

00:23:51.640 We don't know why

00:23:52.400 he withdrew

00:23:52.980 his Grammy nominations

00:23:54.320 but I think

00:23:57.120 it's a step

00:23:57.600 in the right direction

00:23:58.320 because,

00:23:59.100 as you know,

00:24:00.560 Drake is the

00:24:01.260 Nickelback of rap.

00:24:04.840 Anybody?

00:24:06.080 Anybody disagree?

00:24:07.900 Drake is the

00:24:08.700 Nickelback of rap.

00:24:13.400 Here's my take

00:24:14.380 on Drake.

00:24:15.320 Now,

00:24:16.380 keep in mind

00:24:17.040 that art

00:24:18.360 is subjective

00:24:19.100 so if I say

00:24:21.000 I don't enjoy

00:24:22.120 a specific artist

00:24:23.880 it doesn't mean

00:24:25.080 they're not great.

00:24:26.700 It's just

00:24:27.380 a personal thing,

00:24:28.140 right?

00:24:29.160 So,

00:24:29.640 Drake is obviously

00:24:32.000 hugely successful

00:24:33.040 and people love him

00:24:34.320 but when I listen

00:24:35.860 to him

00:24:36.160 I can't

00:24:37.200 stand it.

00:24:38.840 I can't stand

00:24:40.040 ten seconds

00:24:40.860 of that guy

00:24:41.520 his board

00:24:43.000 droning

00:24:43.560 that they call

00:24:44.380 some kind

00:24:44.880 of performance.

00:24:46.340 He feels like

00:24:47.120 to me

00:24:47.660 Drake comes off

00:24:48.920 as somebody

00:24:49.660 who wanted

00:24:50.240 to sing

00:24:50.780 but they didn't

00:24:51.440 have the energy

00:24:52.520 for it.

00:24:54.280 I'd really like

00:24:55.200 to sing like Adele

00:24:56.200 but

00:24:56.460 I think all

00:24:58.440 I can do

00:24:59.400 is say this

00:25:00.540 and I'll

00:25:01.720 call it

00:25:02.320 a sound.

00:25:04.380 I am

00:25:05.020 rapping

00:25:05.760 now.

00:25:07.520 Aren't we

00:25:08.020 all energized

00:25:09.220 by my

00:25:10.600 rapping words?

00:25:14.180 I don't know.

00:25:14.680 I get

00:25:16.240 that most

00:25:17.100 of the world

00:25:17.800 who likes

00:25:18.320 this

00:25:19.120 genre

00:25:20.540 music

00:25:20.940 thinks he's

00:25:21.500 pretty great

00:25:22.120 but

00:25:23.200 I don't

00:25:23.740 see it

00:25:24.060 at all.

00:25:25.840 I love

00:25:26.600 Kanye.

00:25:28.320 There's

00:25:28.860 lots of

00:25:29.220 stuff in

00:25:29.580 the genre

00:25:29.980 that I

00:25:30.340 like a lot

00:25:30.860 so it's

00:25:31.540 not like

00:25:31.900 I'm ragging

00:25:33.120 on the

00:25:33.500 genre

00:25:33.840 at all.

00:25:35.200 I like

00:25:35.560 the genre.

00:25:36.780 I just

00:25:37.160 don't get

00:25:37.900 Drake

00:25:39.660 but

00:25:41.040 I'm

00:25:42.320 completely

00:25:42.720 aware

00:25:43.080 that people

00:25:43.600 love him

00:25:44.000 so and

00:25:44.780 that's

00:25:45.080 fine.

00:25:46.180 All right

00:25:46.520 the funniest

00:25:48.940 thing from

00:25:49.400 the Jussie

00:25:49.980 Smollett

00:25:50.460 case was

00:25:51.200 was it

00:25:52.180 was it

00:25:53.280 one of

00:25:53.620 the Nigerian

00:25:55.000 twins

00:25:55.460 who claimed

00:25:58.720 he didn't

00:25:59.080 know the

00:25:59.420 bathhouse

00:25:59.900 was for

00:26:00.360 for gay

00:26:00.900 stuff?

00:26:07.220 I wonder

00:26:09.540 how long

00:26:09.960 it took

00:26:10.220 him to

00:26:10.500 figure it

00:26:10.860 out.

00:26:14.000 So here's

00:26:14.600 a little

00:26:15.140 information

00:26:15.640 for any

00:26:16.740 Nigerian

00:26:17.720 immigrants

00:26:19.320 who come

00:26:20.300 to this

00:26:20.640 country

00:26:20.960 and are

00:26:21.740 confused

00:26:22.320 by bath

00:26:22.900 houses.

00:26:24.280 I'm pretty

00:26:24.820 sure there

00:26:25.340 are no

00:26:25.680 heterosexual 0.84

00:26:26.300 bath

00:26:26.760 houses.

00:26:27.940 Am I

00:26:28.560 wrong

00:26:28.880 about that?

00:26:31.280 Is there

00:26:31.900 any such

00:26:32.300 thing as a

00:26:32.800 heterosexual 0.84

00:26:33.460 bath house

00:26:34.240 in the

00:26:35.360 United States?

00:26:36.460 In Europe

00:26:37.140 yeah.

00:26:37.960 But not in the

00:26:38.500 United States

00:26:39.080 right?

00:26:40.780 It's called

00:26:41.340 the Y.

00:26:41.760 somebody says

00:26:43.180 but just

00:26:46.000 the just

00:26:47.360 the fact

00:26:47.840 that and

00:26:48.560 apparently

00:26:48.880 there was

00:26:49.560 like gay 1.00

00:26:50.180 pornography

00:26:50.660 on the

00:26:51.180 walls of

00:26:51.780 the private

00:26:52.260 room they

00:26:52.740 went to

00:26:53.280 and maybe

00:26:54.440 they had

00:26:54.760 some physical

00:26:55.300 contacts as

00:26:56.280 Jussie but

00:26:56.920 maybe they

00:26:57.340 didn't as

00:26:58.000 one of the

00:26:58.500 twins.

00:27:00.360 But I

00:27:01.100 just love the

00:27:01.620 fact he

00:27:02.020 didn't know

00:27:02.760 it was a

00:27:03.100 place that

00:27:03.560 gay people

00:27:04.100 went.

00:27:04.480 so there's

00:27:07.520 this we

00:27:08.440 have a

00:27:08.680 result in

00:27:09.400 the case

00:27:09.860 of the

00:27:11.720 guy who

00:27:12.140 claims to

00:27:12.700 be the

00:27:12.940 inventor of

00:27:13.460 Bitcoin.

00:27:15.020 You thought

00:27:15.720 it was

00:27:15.960 Satoshi

00:27:16.420 right?

00:27:16.980 The secret

00:27:19.060 name of

00:27:19.560 whoever did

00:27:19.980 it but

00:27:20.320 somebody

00:27:20.740 an Australian

00:27:22.020 computer

00:27:22.520 scientist

00:27:22.940 named Craig

00:27:23.600 Wright he

00:27:25.020 actually won

00:27:25.720 a Miami

00:27:26.160 civil case

00:27:27.040 that pitted

00:27:28.380 him against

00:27:28.940 the family

00:27:30.620 of his late

00:27:31.080 business partner

00:27:31.720 and I

00:27:32.780 guess the

00:27:33.040 business

00:27:33.320 partner was

00:27:33.900 claiming he

00:27:34.420 was also

00:27:35.100 a part

00:27:35.900 inventor but

00:27:36.660 he lost

00:27:37.080 that.

00:27:38.000 So Craig

00:27:38.460 Wright that

00:27:40.020 doesn't mean

00:27:40.600 he's the

00:27:40.980 inventor but

00:27:43.220 he said if

00:27:43.900 he lost the

00:27:44.600 case he

00:27:45.160 would reveal

00:27:45.800 that all

00:27:47.300 of his

00:27:47.540 holdings and

00:27:48.180 show that he

00:27:48.600 was really

00:27:49.520 Satoshi I

00:27:50.220 guess but

00:27:50.600 he didn't

00:27:51.100 lose so he

00:27:53.220 didn't have to

00:27:53.640 do that so

00:27:54.840 we still don't

00:27:55.480 quite know if

00:27:56.280 he is.

00:27:57.000 What do you

00:27:57.380 think?

00:27:59.940 Did

00:28:00.220 Craig's

00:28:02.380 been debunked

00:28:03.100 in the

00:28:03.340 crypto world

00:28:04.080 for years

00:28:04.640 somebody says.

00:28:07.500 He's not

00:28:08.160 the inventor.

00:28:10.940 All right

00:28:11.260 I'm going to

00:28:13.640 say I'm

00:28:13.980 skeptical of

00:28:15.200 his claim but

00:28:16.080 I don't have

00:28:16.580 any insight

00:28:17.240 into it at

00:28:17.780 all.

00:28:19.000 Seems like

00:28:19.680 it'd be easy

00:28:20.160 to prove

00:28:20.800 because he'd

00:28:22.300 have a few

00:28:22.740 billion dollars

00:28:23.480 to play with

00:28:24.580 wouldn't he?

00:28:26.140 If Craig

00:28:27.420 Wright is not

00:28:28.220 living like a

00:28:28.960 billionaire

00:28:29.280 billionaire I've

00:28:30.500 got some

00:28:30.920 questions about

00:28:31.740 his claim.

00:28:34.340 All right.

00:28:37.260 So let's

00:28:38.160 talk about

00:28:38.560 rapid tests.

00:28:41.620 We still

00:28:42.360 don't have

00:28:42.860 cheap rapid

00:28:43.540 tests.

00:28:43.920 We have

00:28:44.120 rapid tests

00:28:44.660 but they're

00:28:45.100 way expensive

00:28:45.900 and Jen

00:28:48.060 Psaki answered

00:28:49.740 a question about

00:28:50.420 rapid tests by

00:28:51.400 mocking the

00:28:52.140 reporter and

00:28:53.440 saying what

00:28:54.760 do you think

00:28:55.880 we should do?

00:28:56.440 send out a

00:28:59.120 rapid test to

00:29:00.040 every household

00:29:00.800 to which

00:29:02.880 everybody smart

00:29:03.780 thought yes

00:29:05.840 yes

00:29:07.660 that's pretty

00:29:09.480 much exactly

00:29:10.220 what we're

00:29:10.680 asking

00:29:11.000 because otherwise

00:29:13.140 you can't get

00:29:13.780 past the

00:29:14.260 pandemic.

00:29:15.660 So yes

00:29:16.180 yes

00:29:17.520 and why is

00:29:18.920 she mocking 0.90

00:29:19.540 literally the

00:29:21.160 only way past

00:29:21.860 the pandemic

00:29:22.520 that I can

00:29:23.040 see?

00:29:24.480 I don't

00:29:25.120 know.

00:29:26.120 But there

00:29:27.560 is some

00:29:27.980 intrigue over

00:29:28.920 the question

00:29:29.420 of why the

00:29:30.160 U.S.

00:29:30.840 alone was

00:29:31.740 unable to do

00:29:32.440 this thing

00:29:32.920 that we would

00:29:33.440 normally be

00:29:34.000 good at

00:29:34.500 which is

00:29:35.640 approving

00:29:36.160 stuff in a

00:29:37.020 pandemic.

00:29:38.000 You know we

00:29:38.320 did these

00:29:38.980 vaccinations if

00:29:40.000 you call them

00:29:40.380 that in the

00:29:41.360 pandemic.

00:29:42.580 So obviously

00:29:43.900 we had the

00:29:44.720 capability to

00:29:45.820 do this.

00:29:47.200 Don't you

00:29:47.860 think?

00:29:48.140 And it's

00:29:49.480 being blamed

00:29:50.100 on incompetence

00:29:51.360 and bureaucracy.

00:29:55.400 I don't

00:29:56.120 know.

00:29:57.160 I'm not

00:29:57.640 buying it.

00:29:59.000 Sorry.

00:30:00.200 Don't buy it

00:30:01.220 for a second.

00:30:02.800 Clearly

00:30:03.220 there's corruption

00:30:04.100 going on here

00:30:05.000 somewhere.

00:30:06.020 I don't know

00:30:06.700 who.

00:30:07.200 I don't know

00:30:07.680 where.

00:30:08.520 But clearly

00:30:09.240 this is

00:30:09.720 corruption.

00:30:10.740 And if

00:30:11.100 there's nobody

00:30:11.580 digging into

00:30:12.240 this to find

00:30:13.080 out what's

00:30:14.580 going on

00:30:15.300 I don't

00:30:18.140 you know

00:30:19.880 this is a

00:30:21.540 big miss.

00:30:22.500 I mean I

00:30:22.760 think there's

00:30:23.660 awards for

00:30:25.180 somebody who

00:30:25.740 gets to the

00:30:26.160 bottom of

00:30:26.520 this.

00:30:27.180 Now the

00:30:27.540 obvious question

00:30:28.240 is how

00:30:28.760 can we

00:30:29.160 the public

00:30:29.720 know which

00:30:31.500 of the

00:30:31.840 decision makers

00:30:32.680 in the

00:30:33.040 government are

00:30:33.760 associated with

00:30:34.720 any of the

00:30:35.240 pharma companies.

00:30:37.160 I did read an

00:30:38.280 article that said

00:30:38.960 that the

00:30:39.660 gentleman who's

00:30:40.780 responsible for

00:30:42.540 recommending

00:30:43.180 which rapid

00:30:44.420 tests are

00:30:45.260 considered or

00:30:47.040 whatever

00:30:47.300 he did have

00:30:49.180 some

00:30:49.620 association

00:30:51.080 with Abbott

00:30:52.140 in the past

00:30:53.180 but we don't

00:30:54.320 know that he

00:30:54.760 owns any

00:30:55.160 stock.

00:30:55.760 I think he

00:30:56.120 doesn't.

00:30:57.520 But he had a

00:30:58.520 close association

00:30:59.360 with the only

00:31:00.020 one that got

00:31:00.840 quickly approved

00:31:01.920 in the past.

00:31:03.100 He had done

00:31:03.480 some work with

00:31:04.020 them.

00:31:05.140 So that

00:31:07.300 seems like

00:31:07.820 something I

00:31:08.420 don't want to

00:31:08.720 know more

00:31:09.060 about.

00:31:09.960 Wouldn't

00:31:10.260 you?

00:31:11.640 And I would

00:31:12.460 just put this

00:31:13.140 out there.

00:31:13.540 The way that

00:31:14.820 people do

00:31:16.820 illegal things

00:31:17.740 is not just

00:31:18.720 by owning

00:31:19.400 the stock.

00:31:20.780 You could

00:31:21.460 have a family

00:31:22.020 member own

00:31:22.540 the stock

00:31:23.100 and I don't

00:31:23.900 know that

00:31:24.200 anybody would

00:31:24.660 know.

00:31:25.300 Would they?

00:31:26.360 If your

00:31:27.060 spouse owned

00:31:27.820 the stock

00:31:28.240 but you

00:31:28.580 didn't,

00:31:28.920 would anybody

00:31:29.280 know?

00:31:30.640 How about

00:31:30.960 if it was

00:31:31.340 your brother?

00:31:32.420 Would anybody

00:31:32.940 know?

00:31:34.460 The SEC

00:31:35.240 would know?

00:31:36.560 If it's

00:31:37.260 a spouse.

00:31:37.660 How about

00:31:39.940 this?

00:31:42.260 Suppose this

00:31:43.140 gentleman wanted

00:31:44.000 to go do

00:31:45.500 some work for

00:31:46.140 Abbott in

00:31:46.580 the future

00:31:47.000 after making

00:31:49.780 them $1.9

00:31:50.860 billion on

00:31:51.860 rapid tests.

00:31:53.680 Do you think

00:31:54.140 he would get

00:31:54.560 that job?

00:31:55.340 Do you think

00:31:55.680 Abbott would

00:31:56.140 say, yeah,

00:31:56.580 you're hired.

00:31:57.680 You just

00:31:58.280 made us $1.9

00:31:59.280 billion there.

00:32:00.180 Thanks.

00:32:01.160 We will hire 0.99

00:32:01.740 you to consult

00:32:02.480 for any price

00:32:03.240 you want.

00:32:04.900 What do you

00:32:05.560 think?

00:32:07.520 Now, the

00:32:08.840 trouble is

00:32:09.540 that that

00:32:10.540 wouldn't be

00:32:11.000 illegal, would

00:32:11.620 it?

00:32:11.800 It wouldn't

00:32:13.240 be illegal

00:32:13.780 simply to

00:32:14.460 understand that

00:32:16.180 if he worked

00:32:16.860 for Abbott in

00:32:17.540 the future,

00:32:18.240 they would be

00:32:18.760 likely to say

00:32:19.600 yes to

00:32:20.040 whatever he

00:32:20.500 offered.

00:32:21.680 That's not

00:32:22.420 illegal, is

00:32:23.980 it?

00:32:25.300 So, there

00:32:27.020 are a whole

00:32:27.360 bunch of

00:32:28.340 ways corruption

00:32:29.360 can happen in

00:32:30.300 this situation,

00:32:31.100 and they don't

00:32:31.540 all involve

00:32:32.160 owning stock.

00:32:34.220 So, follow

00:32:35.480 the money, but

00:32:36.160 it gets really

00:32:36.680 hard to follow

00:32:37.660 it when you're

00:32:38.780 talking about

00:32:39.440 just understood

00:32:41.060 arrangements.

00:32:42.400 Let me give

00:32:42.840 you another

00:32:43.120 example.

00:32:44.400 Let's say

00:32:44.920 that the

00:32:45.520 person responsible

00:32:46.920 for the rapid

00:32:47.700 tests in the

00:32:48.600 government did

00:32:50.640 not accept any

00:32:51.440 money from

00:32:51.860 anybody, did

00:32:52.780 not own any

00:32:53.500 stock, but he

00:32:55.640 knew that he

00:32:56.100 was going to

00:32:56.480 start a

00:32:56.880 startup soon,

00:32:57.680 and he might

00:32:59.200 want one of

00:32:59.740 the existing

00:33:00.340 pharma companies

00:33:01.260 to foot the

00:33:02.860 money.

00:33:03.100 could you

00:33:05.960 detect that?

00:33:08.520 Is there

00:33:09.060 any way to

00:33:09.540 find out that

00:33:10.220 there was a

00:33:10.600 private conversation

00:33:11.500 in which

00:33:12.040 somebody said,

00:33:12.580 you know, if

00:33:13.760 you give us a

00:33:14.360 little runway

00:33:15.180 here on these

00:33:16.040 rapid tests,

00:33:18.240 we're likely to

00:33:19.600 fund your

00:33:20.540 startup, should

00:33:22.300 you have one

00:33:22.840 in the future.

00:33:24.300 Now, I don't

00:33:24.820 think anybody

00:33:25.200 said that.

00:33:26.540 Like, I'm not

00:33:27.460 alleging that

00:33:28.020 anything like

00:33:28.480 that happened.

00:33:29.320 I'm just saying

00:33:29.880 that there are

00:33:30.340 a thousand ways

00:33:31.460 to be corrupt

00:33:34.020 that would be

00:33:35.120 hard to detect.

00:33:37.720 Right?

00:33:38.600 So I'm not

00:33:39.320 mind-reading, I'm

00:33:40.480 speculating about

00:33:41.660 possibilities.

00:33:43.020 Mind-reading would

00:33:43.780 be, I know what

00:33:45.060 happened.

00:33:46.540 Speculating would

00:33:47.300 be, you know,

00:33:48.560 there are a hundred

00:33:49.060 ways that this

00:33:49.780 could go wrong.

00:33:51.540 We better look

00:33:52.200 into it.

00:33:54.000 All right, so I

00:33:54.940 got big questions

00:33:55.940 on that, and that

00:33:56.920 looks like corruption

00:33:57.620 to me.

00:33:59.900 Weirdly, the

00:34:00.680 White House

00:34:01.260 there was some

00:34:02.960 kind of, I

00:34:05.580 guess, a

00:34:05.900 committee that

00:34:06.480 came up with

00:34:07.100 some recommendations,

00:34:08.660 and the White 0.84

00:34:09.220 House ended up

00:34:09.880 flagging the

00:34:11.160 art industry as

00:34:13.200 a special industry

00:34:14.160 where there's a

00:34:14.740 lot of corruption

00:34:15.300 because you can

00:34:16.720 launder money

00:34:17.360 through art just

00:34:18.460 by overpaying

00:34:19.360 for art,

00:34:20.120 basically.

00:34:21.200 So you just pay

00:34:21.880 too much for art

00:34:22.680 and you can get

00:34:23.580 your illegal money

00:34:24.520 back into the

00:34:25.260 legal system,

00:34:26.440 which is what

00:34:27.280 laundering does.

00:34:27.960 And they're

00:34:30.240 flagging our

00:34:31.360 industry as a

00:34:32.400 money laundering

00:34:33.980 entity.

00:34:35.240 At the same

00:34:35.860 time, Hunter

00:34:36.540 Biden is

00:34:38.220 selling his

00:34:39.600 artwork for

00:34:40.180 half a million

00:34:40.700 dollars to

00:34:41.340 anonymous buyers.

00:34:44.340 How in the world

00:34:45.460 can both these

00:34:46.660 things be happening

00:34:47.360 at the same time?

00:34:48.740 Now, the

00:34:49.920 obvious question

00:34:50.680 to be asked

00:34:51.220 here is,

00:34:52.660 is there anything

00:34:54.340 that Hunter

00:34:54.800 couldn't get away

00:34:55.580 with at this

00:34:56.140 point that he

00:34:57.580 could do right

00:34:58.180 in front of

00:34:58.660 you?

00:35:00.480 Because Hunter's

00:35:01.840 alleged improprieties

00:35:04.320 are kind of

00:35:05.760 well-known,

00:35:06.360 right?

00:35:07.260 We know all of

00:35:08.320 his connections

00:35:08.940 to everything.

00:35:11.160 It's almost

00:35:11.880 transparent.

00:35:14.020 And then we

00:35:14.740 see this art

00:35:15.700 thing, which

00:35:16.600 looks super

00:35:18.180 corrupt, but

00:35:19.760 it's all public.

00:35:21.140 We don't know

00:35:21.840 who the buyers

00:35:22.380 are, but we

00:35:22.980 know what the

00:35:23.460 situation is.

00:35:24.380 And I

00:35:26.460 have to ask,

00:35:27.980 does Hunter

00:35:28.760 Biden even need

00:35:29.580 to show

00:35:30.020 identification

00:35:30.720 when he goes

00:35:31.480 to a bank?

00:35:32.980 Or can he

00:35:33.720 just walk

00:35:34.240 behind the

00:35:34.660 counter, go

00:35:36.100 into the

00:35:36.540 vault, load

00:35:38.220 up a pallet

00:35:39.040 with dollars,

00:35:39.880 and walk out

00:35:40.640 with it?

00:35:42.100 And then

00:35:42.700 somebody will

00:35:43.140 say, well,

00:35:43.880 we've got this

00:35:44.440 story about

00:35:44.920 Hunter Biden.

00:35:45.560 He walked

00:35:45.920 into a bank

00:35:46.480 and took a

00:35:46.920 pallet of

00:35:47.320 cash.

00:35:48.720 And then

00:35:49.280 you're waiting

00:35:49.580 for the rest

00:35:50.100 of the story

00:35:50.600 where he gets

00:35:51.060 indicted and

00:35:51.700 arrested.

00:35:52.720 And it

00:35:53.200 just doesn't

00:35:53.600 happen?

00:35:54.380 And then

00:35:55.200 you check

00:35:55.480 back tomorrow

00:35:56.020 and say,

00:35:56.300 oh, man,

00:35:56.660 he's going

00:35:56.940 to be

00:35:57.100 indicted.

00:35:58.660 Well, he's

00:35:59.260 not indicted.

00:36:00.400 Is there

00:36:00.960 anything this

00:36:01.560 guy can do? 0.90

00:36:03.280 What exactly

00:36:04.280 would it

00:36:05.240 take for

00:36:07.120 him to

00:36:07.540 be, you

00:36:08.200 know,

00:36:08.960 stopped?

00:36:11.320 So we're

00:36:12.380 defunding the

00:36:13.140 police at the

00:36:13.800 same time

00:36:14.280 Hunter's

00:36:14.700 running wild.

00:36:16.860 Not really

00:36:17.560 a related

00:36:18.040 story, but

00:36:18.700 it was

00:36:19.020 funny.

00:36:19.300 All right,

00:36:21.880 so we

00:36:22.160 should do

00:36:22.440 a tweet

00:36:22.920 on what

00:36:23.500 could Hunter

00:36:24.140 get away

00:36:24.640 with based

00:36:25.680 on what

00:36:26.040 he's already

00:36:26.540 getting away

00:36:27.060 with.

00:36:27.840 I don't

00:36:28.380 know that

00:36:28.700 there's any

00:36:29.080 limit.

00:36:30.160 Remember when

00:36:30.720 Trump said

00:36:31.260 he could

00:36:31.640 shoot somebody

00:36:32.320 on Fifth

00:36:32.760 Avenue?

00:36:33.080 I think

00:36:35.500 Hunter Biden

00:36:36.180 could shoot

00:36:37.900 somebody on

00:36:38.640 Fifth Avenue,

00:36:40.940 have sex 0.77

00:36:42.180 with the

00:36:42.760 dead body,

00:36:45.800 snort coke

00:36:46.860 off the

00:36:47.440 corpse in

00:36:49.260 front of

00:36:49.600 100 cameras,

00:36:51.500 and the

00:36:51.900 news would

00:36:52.420 say,

00:36:53.720 better get

00:36:55.080 your

00:36:55.180 vaccinations.

00:36:57.180 All right,

00:36:58.360 I will tell

00:37:00.420 you for

00:37:00.780 anybody who's

00:37:01.400 new, I'm

00:37:01.880 not going

00:37:02.160 to, I

00:37:02.800 I'm not

00:37:03.300 the guy

00:37:03.620 who tells

00:37:04.080 you to

00:37:04.300 get vaccinated,

00:37:05.260 it's a

00:37:05.700 personal

00:37:05.980 decision, and

00:37:07.120 I don't

00:37:07.420 care if

00:37:07.880 you do,

00:37:08.680 okay?

00:37:09.440 So when I

00:37:10.300 talk about

00:37:10.780 stuff, I'm

00:37:11.560 talking about

00:37:11.940 the logic

00:37:12.420 of it, I'm

00:37:13.200 not trying to

00:37:13.720 convince you

00:37:14.240 of anything,

00:37:15.260 so just

00:37:16.000 keep that in

00:37:16.520 mind.

00:37:17.240 But here's

00:37:17.700 the things

00:37:18.120 that we

00:37:18.440 all know,

00:37:20.680 and I

00:37:21.560 think we

00:37:21.860 all know

00:37:22.180 this.

00:37:22.880 So this

00:37:23.320 would be

00:37:23.920 based on

00:37:24.420 the consensus

00:37:26.120 of science.

00:37:27.700 So when I

00:37:28.420 say we all

00:37:28.980 know it,

00:37:30.520 what I mean

00:37:31.180 is that we

00:37:32.260 know that

00:37:32.700 science is

00:37:33.360 telling us

00:37:33.880 it's true,

00:37:34.500 which is

00:37:35.060 different from

00:37:35.500 being true.

00:37:36.820 We all

00:37:37.340 know that,

00:37:37.800 right?

00:37:38.580 But this

00:37:39.140 is what they

00:37:39.800 tell us

00:37:40.320 is true,

00:37:41.040 that the

00:37:41.660 vaccinations

00:37:42.240 greatly reduce

00:37:43.400 your risk

00:37:44.020 of hospitalization

00:37:46.920 and death,

00:37:47.860 and that they

00:37:48.840 reduce the

00:37:49.480 spread, but

00:37:50.600 they don't

00:37:50.820 stop it.

00:37:52.780 Now that's

00:37:53.280 that's

00:37:54.100 the BS

00:37:55.960 starts now.

00:37:58.200 Goodbye,

00:37:58.860 Andrew, for

00:37:59.440 being an

00:38:00.240 asshole.

00:38:02.020 Assholes get

00:38:02.760 banned.

00:38:07.320 Anybody else

00:38:08.300 want to make

00:38:09.040 an asshole 0.90

00:38:09.820 comment about

00:38:10.600 what I'm

00:38:10.960 secretly

00:38:11.540 thinking?

00:38:13.300 Anybody?

00:38:15.100 All right.

00:38:15.740 so the

00:38:17.620 rest of

00:38:17.980 you maybe

00:38:18.340 could be

00:38:18.720 adults and

00:38:19.480 just listen

00:38:19.940 to it

00:38:20.280 before you

00:38:20.780 decide that

00:38:21.340 I'm secretly

00:38:22.180 trying to

00:38:22.780 convince you

00:38:23.300 to get the

00:38:23.880 vaccination.

00:38:25.660 Fucking

00:38:26.140 idiots.

00:38:27.260 All right.

00:38:28.960 So according

00:38:30.060 to the

00:38:31.000 experts, it

00:38:31.860 reduces your

00:38:32.840 hospitalization and

00:38:33.700 death risk to

00:38:35.160 practically nothing,

00:38:36.860 from practically

00:38:37.900 nothing, because

00:38:38.500 it wasn't that

00:38:39.000 high to start,

00:38:40.080 and that the

00:38:41.640 rate of the

00:38:42.080 spread would be

00:38:42.860 less.

00:38:43.920 Now people

00:38:44.460 quite reasonably

00:38:45.340 said, show me

00:38:46.180 your work.

00:38:47.220 How can you

00:38:47.680 say this?

00:38:48.360 Where are those

00:38:48.920 studies?

00:38:49.840 To which I say,

00:38:50.720 don't ask me for

00:38:51.500 studies.

00:38:51.940 I don't believe

00:38:52.360 any studies.

00:38:53.240 I'm telling you

00:38:53.720 what the experts

00:38:54.260 say.

00:38:55.520 That's what they

00:38:56.140 say.

00:38:57.140 Ask them for

00:38:57.660 studies.

00:38:59.500 All right.

00:39:01.220 But then people

00:39:02.120 keep saying that

00:39:03.180 the jabs don't 0.89

00:39:04.000 work.

00:39:07.580 What?

00:39:10.080 Why would you

00:39:10.880 say they don't

00:39:11.440 work if you

00:39:12.440 know that

00:39:13.820 basically 100% of

00:39:15.340 experts say that

00:39:16.860 it prevents you

00:39:17.540 from dying or

00:39:18.400 getting badly

00:39:19.020 hospitalized?

00:39:20.240 Why would you

00:39:20.760 say they don't

00:39:21.200 work?

00:39:23.520 That's word

00:39:25.040 thinking.

00:39:26.040 So in my book

00:39:26.620 Loser Think, I

00:39:27.500 talk about this.

00:39:28.820 Word thinking is

00:39:29.740 that you're trying

00:39:30.140 to take a

00:39:30.800 definition and

00:39:32.900 change the

00:39:33.420 definition or

00:39:34.260 use a definition

00:39:35.360 the way you

00:39:35.900 want, and you

00:39:36.820 think that wins

00:39:37.440 an argument.

00:39:39.180 It doesn't.

00:39:40.360 It's just a word

00:39:41.380 you put on

00:39:41.820 something.

00:39:42.880 So if you

00:39:43.700 want to say

00:39:44.100 the vaccination

00:39:45.940 doesn't work,

00:39:49.100 that just means

00:39:49.900 you've defined

00:39:50.560 working a

00:39:51.540 different way.

00:39:52.700 We all know

00:39:53.580 that it doesn't

00:39:54.100 stop the

00:39:56.180 virus, right?

00:39:57.360 There's nobody

00:39:58.120 who's confused

00:39:58.860 about that.

00:40:00.020 We know you

00:40:00.740 can still get

00:40:01.380 it if you're

00:40:01.840 vaccinated, right?

00:40:03.500 Everybody knows

00:40:04.060 that.

00:40:04.760 But why would

00:40:05.320 you say it

00:40:05.700 doesn't work

00:40:06.480 according to

00:40:07.540 the science?

00:40:08.240 Because the

00:40:09.060 people who say

00:40:09.540 it doesn't

00:40:09.960 work are

00:40:11.340 pointing to

00:40:11.900 the studies

00:40:12.420 and the

00:40:12.760 science.

00:40:13.720 But the

00:40:13.980 science says

00:40:14.500 it works.

00:40:16.120 Now, if

00:40:17.280 anybody's coming

00:40:17.900 in late, I'm

00:40:19.700 not telling you

00:40:20.360 to get

00:40:20.640 vaccinated.

00:40:21.940 I'm not telling

00:40:22.600 you not to.

00:40:23.940 I'm just talking

00:40:24.600 about what we

00:40:25.520 know and what

00:40:26.000 we don't.

00:40:26.620 You make your

00:40:27.100 own decisions.

00:40:28.460 Now, this is

00:40:29.320 the worst argument

00:40:30.560 against the

00:40:31.360 vaccinations, to

00:40:32.740 say they don't

00:40:33.400 work.

00:40:33.800 Would you

00:40:35.440 like a good

00:40:36.040 argument?

00:40:37.600 Anybody?

00:40:39.080 I'm going to

00:40:39.660 give you the

00:40:40.180 good argument

00:40:40.880 for not getting

00:40:41.740 vaccinated.

00:40:43.580 All right?

00:40:44.980 Here's the

00:40:45.580 good argument

00:40:46.160 for not getting

00:40:46.820 vaccinated.

00:40:48.380 Nobody knows

00:40:49.140 what the

00:40:49.460 side effects

00:40:49.920 are.

00:40:51.500 You think

00:40:52.300 you're in a

00:40:52.780 demographic that

00:40:53.600 doesn't have

00:40:54.000 much risk.

00:40:55.780 You think

00:40:56.580 natural immunity

00:40:57.580 is going to

00:40:58.500 be better than

00:40:59.080 a vaccination.

00:41:00.600 And you think

00:41:01.300 the government

00:41:01.840 is a liar. 0.95

00:41:03.800 And you think

00:41:04.340 that the

00:41:04.660 companies are

00:41:05.500 liars and

00:41:07.260 that they're

00:41:07.560 not telling

00:41:08.040 you all the

00:41:08.500 risks.

00:41:10.320 That's a

00:41:10.920 pretty good

00:41:11.200 argument.

00:41:12.220 Now, it's

00:41:12.720 not the

00:41:13.120 argument that

00:41:13.660 I agree

00:41:14.100 with because

00:41:15.900 my own risk

00:41:16.760 is different

00:41:17.240 than your

00:41:17.660 risk, etc.

00:41:18.460 So my

00:41:19.640 decision about

00:41:20.320 vaccinations

00:41:20.940 shouldn't match

00:41:22.180 yours.

00:41:23.240 You should

00:41:23.660 make your

00:41:24.000 own.

00:41:25.220 But the

00:41:26.420 bad argument

00:41:27.120 is they

00:41:27.520 don't work.

00:41:29.620 When you

00:41:30.360 say they

00:41:30.700 don't work,

00:41:31.400 you don't

00:41:31.840 sound smart,

00:41:33.000 honestly.

00:41:33.800 That sounds

00:41:35.020 just under

00:41:35.580 informed.

00:41:36.880 Because I'm

00:41:38.180 pretty sure

00:41:38.820 we'd know if

00:41:40.540 they didn't

00:41:40.900 make any

00:41:41.320 effect.

00:41:42.860 Like, it

00:41:43.340 seems really

00:41:44.080 clear that

00:41:45.020 the hospitalizations

00:41:46.080 and deaths

00:41:46.620 go way down.

00:41:48.480 Now, what

00:41:49.740 do we know

00:41:50.120 about the

00:41:50.500 side effects?

00:41:51.920 Some of you

00:41:52.580 say, but,

00:41:53.320 but, but,

00:41:53.940 the VAERS

00:41:54.500 database.

00:41:55.620 That's a

00:41:56.160 bad argument.

00:41:57.560 That might

00:41:58.420 be right.

00:41:58.960 But it's a

00:42:00.900 bad argument.

00:42:01.540 Because the

00:42:02.860 VAERS database

00:42:03.640 is not

00:42:04.140 meant to

00:42:04.780 do the

00:42:05.260 thing that

00:42:05.640 you're doing

00:42:06.020 with it,

00:42:06.420 which is

00:42:06.780 looking at

00:42:07.440 it and

00:42:07.640 saying,

00:42:07.960 hey, I

00:42:09.200 guess that's

00:42:09.700 strong evidence

00:42:10.460 that there's

00:42:11.240 problems.

00:42:11.700 It's not

00:42:12.040 meant for

00:42:12.380 that.

00:42:13.400 And we

00:42:13.900 don't, we

00:42:14.220 have no

00:42:14.580 confidence

00:42:15.020 that it's

00:42:16.480 accurate.

00:42:17.560 And once

00:42:18.000 just everybody

00:42:19.300 gets

00:42:19.620 vaccinated,

00:42:20.900 every problem

00:42:21.560 you have

00:42:22.140 will come

00:42:22.520 soon after

00:42:23.020 getting

00:42:23.320 vaccinated,

00:42:24.020 right?

00:42:24.280 So, especially

00:42:26.360 if you have

00:42:26.860 the, so

00:42:29.240 condescending.

00:42:32.860 Sri

00:42:33.400 Insight says,

00:42:34.140 so condescending.

00:42:35.360 What is

00:42:35.920 condescending?

00:42:37.240 I'm talking

00:42:37.740 about the

00:42:38.120 arguments, not

00:42:39.100 the people.

00:42:40.960 The arguments

00:42:42.140 can suck, but 0.89

00:42:44.720 the people can

00:42:45.360 be awesome.

00:42:46.380 Are you okay

00:42:46.860 with that?

00:42:48.000 I'm not, I'm

00:42:49.780 not saying that

00:42:50.480 you're dumb or 0.87

00:42:52.460 that you're making

00:42:53.000 a wrong decision.

00:42:54.280 I'm not saying

00:42:55.040 that.

00:42:55.760 I'm saying

00:42:56.180 that there's

00:42:56.560 good arguments

00:42:57.180 and bad

00:42:57.560 arguments, and

00:42:58.500 I would like

00:42:59.580 to equate

00:43:00.500 you with

00:43:00.840 the good

00:43:01.100 arguments, so

00:43:02.340 that you can

00:43:02.720 be good

00:43:03.080 people with

00:43:03.520 good arguments.

00:43:04.500 Whichever way

00:43:05.160 you go, use

00:43:06.580 the good

00:43:06.920 argument, okay?

00:43:08.420 Don't use the

00:43:09.000 bad argument.

00:43:10.100 It makes you

00:43:10.720 less likely to

00:43:11.740 persuade.

00:43:12.600 Use the good

00:43:13.140 one.

00:43:14.800 Now, to me

00:43:16.680 it comes down

00:43:17.260 to your unknown

00:43:18.500 risk of the

00:43:19.280 virus itself,

00:43:20.920 compared to

00:43:21.720 the unknown

00:43:22.300 risk of the

00:43:23.240 vaccinations.

00:43:24.280 How many

00:43:25.480 of you think

00:43:26.100 you know

00:43:26.720 which is the

00:43:27.580 bigger risk?

00:43:28.400 No.

00:43:29.580 Not guessing,

00:43:30.980 not assuming,

00:43:31.760 not a hunch,

00:43:33.160 but how many

00:43:33.680 of you think

00:43:34.200 you know

00:43:34.980 which is the

00:43:36.480 biggest risk?

00:43:37.380 The vaccination

00:43:37.960 itself, or

00:43:39.560 the virus

00:43:41.420 itself?

00:43:42.940 How many

00:43:43.400 of you know

00:43:44.400 is the

00:43:45.280 bigger risk?

00:43:52.320 No one

00:43:52.960 does, no

00:43:53.700 one does.

00:43:56.320 Somebody says

00:43:57.040 catching the

00:43:57.640 virus obviously,

00:43:58.600 not obviously.

00:43:59.820 What do you

00:44:00.400 mean obviously?

00:44:01.840 How in the world

00:44:02.440 could that be

00:44:02.880 obvious?

00:44:05.280 No idea,

00:44:06.400 unknowable.

00:44:07.320 Yeah, so

00:44:07.680 everybody says

00:44:08.360 it's unknowable,

00:44:09.600 that's the right

00:44:10.340 answer.

00:44:11.640 Now given

00:44:12.280 that that's

00:44:12.800 the number

00:44:13.360 one biggest

00:44:14.240 variable,

00:44:16.520 well let me

00:44:16.920 ask this

00:44:17.280 question.

00:44:18.080 Is the

00:44:18.760 side effect

00:44:19.460 risk,

00:44:20.900 or the

00:44:21.480 long-term

00:44:21.840 risk of

00:44:22.340 the virus

00:44:22.960 versus the 0.55

00:44:24.000 vaccine,

00:44:25.900 plus the

00:44:27.060 short-term

00:44:27.440 risk,

00:44:28.440 do you

00:44:32.360 feel you

00:44:33.000 understand those

00:44:33.720 risks?

00:44:34.080 anyway,

00:44:37.080 let me ask

00:44:37.680 this question.

00:44:38.460 Do you

00:44:38.640 think that

00:44:38.960 the risks

00:44:39.560 of the

00:44:40.680 vaccination

00:44:41.040 itself,

00:44:42.060 do you

00:44:42.360 think that

00:44:42.680 that's the

00:44:43.160 biggest

00:44:43.540 variable in

00:44:45.900 your decision?

00:44:46.920 Is the

00:44:47.320 risk of

00:44:48.080 the

00:44:48.240 vaccination

00:44:48.900 hurting you

00:44:50.180 itself,

00:44:51.040 is that the

00:44:51.620 biggest variable

00:44:52.540 in your

00:44:52.960 decision,

00:44:54.020 compared to

00:44:55.720 the risk of

00:44:56.160 the virus

00:44:56.600 itself?

00:45:00.980 No.

00:45:01.780 So if

00:45:02.120 it's not

00:45:02.480 your biggest

00:45:02.920 variable,

00:45:03.420 what is a

00:45:03.820 bigger variable

00:45:04.440 than that?

00:45:05.240 Somebody tell

00:45:06.060 me.

00:45:06.820 For those

00:45:07.280 of you who

00:45:07.660 say that

00:45:08.060 the risk

00:45:08.660 from the

00:45:10.720 vaccination is

00:45:11.420 not the

00:45:11.860 biggest variable,

00:45:12.680 what is the

00:45:13.700 biggest variable?

00:45:15.040 Your health,

00:45:15.760 but that's in

00:45:16.640 all the

00:45:16.920 decisions.

00:45:17.480 Your age,

00:45:19.020 no, I

00:45:19.700 mean we're

00:45:20.200 adjusting for

00:45:20.840 age and

00:45:21.300 stuff, so

00:45:21.660 assuming

00:45:22.520 everybody's

00:45:23.120 made the

00:45:23.580 decision about

00:45:25.240 their

00:45:25.420 comorbidities

00:45:26.300 and their

00:45:26.640 age and

00:45:27.000 all that,

00:45:28.000 but that's

00:45:28.460 baked into

00:45:30.680 it.

00:45:31.620 But once

00:45:32.080 you've done

00:45:32.420 that,

00:45:32.840 isn't

00:45:34.240 your biggest

00:45:34.780 variable the

00:45:35.900 risk?

00:45:38.140 Easy travel?

00:45:39.120 Oh, okay.

00:45:39.960 Some people

00:45:40.420 say they

00:45:40.860 just did it

00:45:41.680 for the

00:45:41.980 travel, but

00:45:42.800 that also

00:45:43.280 assumes that

00:45:44.060 it wasn't a

00:45:45.600 big risk for

00:45:46.900 the vaccination,

00:45:47.620 in your

00:45:47.980 mind.

00:45:51.460 Supporting a

00:45:52.160 safety-obsessed

00:45:53.200 world.

00:45:53.900 Okay.

00:45:55.020 That would be a

00:45:55.780 philosophical

00:45:56.340 objection.

00:45:58.040 Got it.

00:45:58.580 it's a

00:46:01.440 Chinese

00:46:01.740 bioweapon

00:46:02.460 being

00:46:02.740 injected

00:46:03.140 into you,

00:46:03.740 but the

00:46:07.700 virus is a

00:46:08.420 Chinese

00:46:08.660 bioweapon.

00:46:10.720 I don't

00:46:11.020 know what

00:46:11.280 the

00:46:11.420 vaccination

00:46:11.820 is.

00:46:13.660 All right.

00:46:14.420 Well, all of

00:46:15.040 you are much

00:46:15.680 more reasonable

00:46:16.300 than I was

00:46:17.060 expecting,

00:46:18.640 actually, so

00:46:19.220 good for

00:46:19.580 you.

00:46:19.800 And, let's

00:46:24.700 see what else

00:46:25.100 is going

00:46:25.380 on.

00:46:28.080 What would

00:46:28.920 happen when

00:46:31.080 100% of

00:46:32.300 people in

00:46:32.980 any place

00:46:33.680 get vaccinated?

00:46:36.580 What would

00:46:37.360 happen in a

00:46:38.160 place where

00:46:38.720 100% are

00:46:39.560 vaccinated?

00:46:40.600 What would

00:46:41.180 happen to

00:46:41.640 the VAERS

00:46:42.440 reporting?

00:46:45.100 What do you

00:46:45.860 think?

00:46:46.380 So the

00:46:46.820 VAERS

00:46:47.260 database has

00:46:48.020 the adverse

00:46:48.640 reactions that's

00:46:49.660 where people

00:46:50.400 report them.

00:46:51.420 Now, it's

00:46:51.740 not scientific,

00:46:52.600 it's just

00:46:53.000 anecdotal

00:46:53.640 reports.

00:46:54.760 But when

00:46:55.200 everybody is

00:46:56.120 vaccinated,

00:46:57.500 what would

00:46:57.980 the VAERS

00:46:58.480 database say?

00:47:00.480 Wouldn't it

00:47:00.940 say that

00:47:01.540 everything that

00:47:03.100 is unexplained

00:47:04.600 is caused

00:47:05.620 by the

00:47:05.960 vaccination?

00:47:07.200 So you

00:47:07.900 should expect

00:47:08.580 that no

00:47:09.560 matter how

00:47:09.960 many people

00:47:10.380 get vaccinated,

00:47:11.240 the number

00:47:11.660 of people

00:47:12.000 infected should

00:47:12.700 go up.

00:47:14.020 Does

00:47:14.220 everybody

00:47:14.480 get that?

00:47:16.620 That if

00:47:17.180 everything is

00:47:17.820 the way the

00:47:18.360 scientists

00:47:18.860 understand that

00:47:20.480 the vaccinations

00:47:21.240 reduce the

00:47:23.340 length of

00:47:23.740 time you

00:47:24.040 have it and

00:47:24.600 your hospitalizations

00:47:25.440 and your

00:47:26.120 death rates,

00:47:27.560 if everything

00:47:30.380 about that is

00:47:30.920 true, what

00:47:33.360 would you

00:47:33.700 expect?

00:47:35.820 You would

00:47:36.420 expect the

00:47:36.820 VAERS database

00:47:37.420 to go through

00:47:38.000 the roof,

00:47:38.500 right?

00:47:39.280 The more

00:47:39.940 people who

00:47:40.440 are vaccinated,

00:47:42.080 the more the

00:47:42.940 VAERS rate

00:47:44.360 will go up.

00:47:44.940 but you

00:47:45.700 understand that

00:47:46.300 that would

00:47:46.580 go up

00:47:46.900 whether or

00:47:47.540 not the

00:47:48.160 vaccinations

00:47:48.680 were causing

00:47:49.360 problems.

00:47:50.480 How many

00:47:50.820 of you

00:47:51.060 understand

00:47:51.440 that?

00:47:52.820 That no

00:47:53.400 matter what,

00:47:55.020 as more

00:47:55.780 people get

00:47:56.260 vaccinated,

00:47:57.560 the VAERS

00:47:58.040 database report

00:47:59.060 should go

00:47:59.620 through the

00:48:00.060 roof, even

00:48:01.360 if the

00:48:01.680 vaccinations

00:48:02.180 were perfectly

00:48:02.940 safe.

00:48:03.520 Does

00:48:03.680 everybody

00:48:03.900 get that?

00:48:05.620 Is there

00:48:06.240 anybody who

00:48:06.600 doesn't

00:48:06.900 understand that

00:48:07.840 the VAERS

00:48:08.280 database will

00:48:08.980 go through

00:48:09.380 the roof

00:48:09.900 no matter

00:48:11.700 what?

00:48:12.060 it doesn't

00:48:13.720 have an

00:48:14.000 option of

00:48:14.400 doing

00:48:14.580 anything

00:48:14.840 else.

00:48:17.520 Right.

00:48:17.860 It would

00:48:18.040 be correlation

00:48:18.640 not causation

00:48:19.520 but there

00:48:20.460 isn't any

00:48:21.020 way the

00:48:21.420 VAERS

00:48:21.620 database

00:48:22.080 can't go

00:48:22.620 way up

00:48:23.140 no matter

00:48:24.660 what the

00:48:25.060 vaccinations

00:48:25.560 are doing.

00:48:28.400 Right?

00:48:33.120 JFK

00:48:33.720 Jr.

00:48:34.160 shows up

00:48:34.560 when we

00:48:34.840 get to

00:48:35.080 100%.

00:48:37.200 VAERS

00:48:38.760 is not

00:48:39.580 as...

00:48:40.280 Doctors

00:48:40.920 want to

00:48:41.320 support

00:48:41.700 an

00:48:41.980 adverse

00:48:42.520 report

00:48:43.100 that has

00:48:43.460 passed

00:48:43.800 two weeks

00:48:44.400 of

00:48:44.600 VAX.

00:48:45.440 Okay.

00:48:46.720 Doesn't

00:48:47.180 change my

00:48:47.720 point.

00:48:49.600 Yeah.

00:48:49.880 It should

00:48:50.260 skyrocket

00:48:50.980 no matter

00:48:51.420 what because

00:48:51.920 we're all

00:48:52.220 talking about

00:48:52.780 it.

00:48:53.680 The fact

00:48:54.140 that it's

00:48:54.460 a national

00:48:55.000 conversation

00:48:55.640 should make

00:48:56.280 the reports

00:48:57.260 go through

00:48:57.660 the roof.

00:48:58.340 And the

00:48:58.840 fact that

00:48:59.240 so many

00:48:59.680 people are

00:49:00.100 now vaccinated

00:49:00.840 that should

00:49:02.120 also make

00:49:02.620 it go

00:49:02.860 through the

00:49:03.220 roof even

00:49:03.820 if the

00:49:04.980 vaccinations

00:49:05.460 don't hurt

00:49:06.040 anybody.

00:49:08.960 Right.

00:49:09.460 So most

00:49:10.380 of the people

00:49:10.720 I see

00:49:11.060 arguing on

00:49:11.560 the internet

00:49:11.900 don't seem

00:49:12.420 to understand

00:49:12.960 that the

00:49:13.340 VAERS

00:49:13.600 database

00:49:13.980 has to

00:49:14.520 go up.

00:49:15.360 If everything

00:49:16.160 we know

00:49:16.560 about human

00:49:17.180 beings and

00:49:17.900 math is

00:49:19.060 true, it

00:49:20.120 has to go

00:49:20.520 up.

00:49:20.680 It has to

00:49:20.980 go up a

00:49:21.240 lot and

00:49:21.660 it has to

00:49:21.960 go up

00:49:22.160 fast.

00:49:24.000 It doesn't

00:49:24.660 mean anything.

00:49:25.880 It could

00:49:26.280 mean something

00:49:26.860 but it

00:49:27.580 doesn't

00:49:27.800 necessarily

00:49:28.460 mean

00:49:28.800 something.

00:49:30.400 All

00:49:30.500 right.

00:49:33.340 And that

00:49:34.220 is just

00:49:35.900 about what I

00:49:36.400 wanted to

00:49:36.740 tell you

00:49:37.040 today.

00:49:37.380 Scott, we

00:49:41.040 aren't

00:49:41.260 idiots.

00:49:42.480 You know, I

00:49:42.860 think the

00:49:43.140 people watching

00:49:43.700 this live

00:49:44.240 stream are

00:49:44.880 more informed

00:49:46.300 and better

00:49:47.040 thinkers than

00:49:47.780 the people who

00:49:48.500 are just

00:49:49.200 random Twitter

00:49:50.040 users in the

00:49:50.740 public.

00:49:51.440 How many of

00:49:52.000 you would

00:49:52.260 agree with

00:49:52.680 that statement?

00:49:53.840 Because most

00:49:54.560 of what we

00:49:55.020 talk about is

00:49:55.900 how to think

00:49:56.440 about stuff

00:49:56.960 better.

00:49:58.100 If you spend

00:49:59.620 enough time

00:50:00.340 learning to

00:50:01.040 think, you're

00:50:01.880 going to be

00:50:02.300 better at it.

00:50:03.660 Yeah.

00:50:03.960 And locals,

00:50:04.720 it's almost

00:50:05.560 all yeses.

00:50:08.640 And here on

00:50:09.460 YouTube, there

00:50:10.280 are more

00:50:10.560 people just

00:50:11.160 wandering in

00:50:11.860 for the first

00:50:12.340 time, so it's

00:50:12.920 going to be a

00:50:13.240 little different.

00:50:15.460 Yeah.

00:50:16.020 You know, when I

00:50:17.020 was talking about

00:50:18.100 the VAERS

00:50:18.440 database, I was

00:50:19.260 kind of expecting

00:50:20.020 a pushback, but

00:50:22.060 I didn't get it.

00:50:23.580 Because I think

00:50:24.400 you're all smarter

00:50:25.060 than the average

00:50:25.800 at this point.

00:50:28.620 You are

00:50:29.260 geniuses, and

00:50:30.420 if I may say

00:50:31.380 so, in

00:50:32.920 inexplicably

00:50:33.680 sexy.

00:50:35.500 And that's

00:50:36.440 not just for

00:50:37.200 the people

00:50:38.740 who like

00:50:39.060 smart people.

00:50:43.700 Better

00:50:44.180 looking, and

00:50:45.340 sexier.

00:50:45.940 Yeah, it's

00:50:46.460 true.

00:50:50.360 Yum.

00:50:52.840 I don't

00:50:53.460 ever learn how

00:50:54.080 to think from

00:50:54.620 a cartoonist,

00:50:55.540 lol.

00:50:57.340 Well,

00:50:58.900 apparently you're

00:50:59.660 right.

00:51:00.960 One of the

00:51:01.560 comments on

00:51:02.060 YouTube was,

00:51:02.920 that he

00:51:03.700 doesn't learn

00:51:04.240 how to think

00:51:05.160 from a

00:51:05.540 cartoonist.

00:51:06.520 To which I

00:51:07.340 say, I'll

00:51:08.280 bet that's

00:51:08.720 true.

00:51:09.800 I'll bet you

00:51:10.320 have not

00:51:10.620 learned how

00:51:11.000 to think.

00:51:12.300 So, I'm

00:51:14.280 going to say

00:51:14.880 goodbye to

00:51:15.420 YouTube.

00:51:16.200 I'm going to

00:51:16.500 spend a minute

00:51:17.380 here with my

00:51:18.840 locals people,

00:51:19.820 and I will

00:51:20.880 talk to you

00:51:21.580 tomorrow.

00:51:22.660 tomorrow.

00:51:31.580 you

00:51:31.720 more

00:51:32.400 than

00:51:32.680 you

00:51:34.000 know,

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 07, 2021

Episode 1585 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Crooks and Idiots Running the World

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript