Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 07, 2021


Episode 1585 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Crooks and Idiots Running the World


Episode Stats

Length

51 minutes

Words per Minute

140.25722

Word Count

7,234

Sentence Count

489

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Scott Adams talks about the Omicron virus and why you should get infected with it. He also talks about Devin Nunes and his new job as the new CEO of the conservative website Truth Vs. and why he doesn t like it.


Transcript

00:00:00.400 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that ever happened to you.
00:00:04.880 Yep, coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of your life and every other life on this planet.
00:00:10.660 It's that good.
00:00:12.120 And today is going to be a burner.
00:00:14.200 A burner, I tell you.
00:00:15.960 It's going to light your hair on fire and activate all of your senses in a good way.
00:00:22.440 But before we do that, let's have a thing I like to call the simultaneous sip.
00:00:26.880 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stein, a candy jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:33.940 Filling with your favorite liquid I like, coffee.
00:00:37.500 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, including your vitamin D.
00:00:47.380 I don't know that there's any science behind that, but I feel like it's true, and that's good enough.
00:00:52.320 Go.
00:00:52.600 Go.
00:00:56.880 Ah, yeah, that's the stuff.
00:01:00.240 That's the good stuff right there.
00:01:01.800 Well, did you see that Devin Nunes will be the CEO of, I guess, Trump's platform that he's creating, Truth?
00:01:13.540 Is it Truth something?
00:01:16.080 And that'll be fun.
00:01:19.340 So that's a pretty serious CEO.
00:01:21.780 But I worry that it will become just a conservative platform, and then we'll never get to talk to each other again.
00:01:28.200 You know, there's a lot of pressure I get to, you know, leave the traditional platforms and go to the alternative platforms.
00:01:38.300 Now, except for locals, which is a special case, I'm not sure I want to go where there are only conservatives or only people on the left.
00:01:48.780 That feels like working in the wrong direction, really.
00:01:53.440 Now, I suppose if you get canceled, it's the only choice you have.
00:01:56.500 But I'd rather have some chance of talking to people who disagree with me instead of just talking to people who agree with me.
00:02:06.840 Well, the golden age is here, and I will give you a few different examples of it.
00:02:11.900 Number one, the Omicron virus.
00:02:16.740 It's too early to say this for sure.
00:02:19.920 I'm just feeling good.
00:02:22.620 So the Omicron has now hit my state, California.
00:02:26.460 We've got a few identified cases in the south.
00:02:29.300 And by the way, a number of people asked, how do we know what variant it is?
00:02:33.700 Because as people who do testing for a living point out, we don't test for that.
00:02:40.740 You know, if you go in to get a COVID test, nobody's checking your variant.
00:02:44.300 So I assume it has to be some kind of a DNA analysis.
00:02:47.160 And then I ask myself, how do they know who to check?
00:02:52.240 How do they do that?
00:02:53.260 Is it some kind of representative sample?
00:02:56.240 They must do some kind of representative sample.
00:02:58.380 But then how do they know there are exactly two people who have the variant?
00:03:03.060 If you did a representative sample, you wouldn't necessarily know, would you?
00:03:08.160 I guess you don't mix these samples.
00:03:11.240 So yeah, I guess you would know.
00:03:13.380 It's a narrative sample, somebody says.
00:03:15.820 Well, I want that sweet, sweet Omicron to come my way,
00:03:19.240 because apparently there are no reports of deaths or even hospitalizations.
00:03:25.000 Did you hear what I just said?
00:03:26.520 Well, apparently there are no cases of hospitalization or deaths with the Omicron.
00:03:33.940 That doesn't mean it's not happening,
00:03:36.200 because it's a little too early to get all the way excited about it.
00:03:42.360 But I'm a little bit excited.
00:03:44.600 It's premature.
00:03:46.160 It could turn out to be just a big nothing.
00:03:48.820 Maybe it doesn't give you any immunity against the other variants.
00:03:51.700 Who knows? Anything's possible.
00:03:53.100 But at the moment, I choose optimism.
00:03:56.520 And I think this sweet, sweet Omicron, if I could get it, I would infect myself tomorrow.
00:04:02.360 If I had a choice between a third booster, or, you know, the booster shot, or the Omicron,
00:04:09.640 which one's a better bet?
00:04:13.120 Would you rather have a booster or the Omicron?
00:04:16.540 Well, we don't know, right?
00:04:19.840 The last thing you want to do is listen to health advice from a cartoonist,
00:04:23.760 and then go get yourself infected and die.
00:04:26.840 Don't do that.
00:04:28.560 But I'm telling you, we might be on the verge of something really good here with this Omicron.
00:04:33.740 Let me tell you about an investment method that I sometimes use with mixed results.
00:04:42.660 Don't be like me.
00:04:44.260 Don't follow my medical advice, and definitely don't follow my financial advice, okay?
00:04:48.920 Got that.
00:04:50.020 These are just things to talk about, not things to recommend.
00:04:52.580 But one of my gambling methods that I've been trying out is betting against the news.
00:05:00.300 Meaning that if the news says something is terrible and we're all going to die,
00:05:05.200 I bet against that.
00:05:06.400 If I can find a way to buy a stock, that would be the bet against the news.
00:05:10.620 So when the Omicron variant came out, I bet against it by buying stock in Wynn, the casino, hotel.
00:05:23.280 So the Wynn is a high-quality hotel-casino property that got beaten up by the pandemic.
00:05:30.820 And when the Omicron news came, it dipped again.
00:05:34.560 And I said to myself, you know, the news is usually wrong.
00:05:40.620 So that was my whole bet.
00:05:42.920 My whole bet is the news is usually wrong.
00:05:45.820 And it was worried about the Omicron, so I said, they're usually wrong.
00:05:50.040 So I'll just bet against it.
00:05:51.480 So I bought Wynn stock.
00:05:53.020 As of yesterday, it was up.
00:05:55.040 Let's see if it's a bad idea as of today.
00:05:58.900 Let's see what's happening today.
00:06:00.460 It might be too early.
00:06:02.800 Where is it?
00:06:04.280 Where the hell is it?
00:06:06.200 Up another 3.8% today.
00:06:08.300 So that would be up about 7% or 9% since I bought it just, you know, the other day.
00:06:15.540 So don't do what I do because I also bought years ago stock in...
00:06:22.520 What was the company that did the Gulf disaster?
00:06:27.440 Was that...
00:06:29.300 Which oil company?
00:06:31.600 Oh, BP, yeah.
00:06:32.700 So BP did that.
00:06:34.200 So when BP was totally beaten down, I bought that stock.
00:06:38.380 Same purpose.
00:06:39.860 I was betting against the news because the news was saying it's the worst disaster, blah, blah, blah.
00:06:45.100 It'll take years to get better.
00:06:46.800 Now here, I was right, but I was a little bit wrong, meaning that I bet against the news
00:06:54.200 that it would be an ecological disaster of epic proportions.
00:06:59.860 I bet that it would be less of a disaster than the news was reporting.
00:07:05.960 Was I right?
00:07:07.820 Apparently.
00:07:08.780 Apparently.
00:07:09.480 They figured out how to minimize it.
00:07:11.780 Stuff didn't die as much as they thought.
00:07:14.060 So it turned out to be way less of a problem than the news predicted.
00:07:19.400 So I correctly predicted that the news would be wrong, but the stock was a dog.
00:07:27.940 So in terms of a trading method, it didn't work.
00:07:31.800 So it may work with the win purchase.
00:07:35.560 It didn't work with BP.
00:07:37.780 So don't take my advice.
00:07:40.220 But if you tried to do this, you need a portfolio.
00:07:43.520 Meaning, don't do it with one stock.
00:07:45.900 That's just gambling.
00:07:47.600 But if you had a philosophy you wanted to check with smallish enough money that you could buy,
00:07:53.200 you know, say three to five stocks that fell into that category where you're betting against the news,
00:08:00.260 I bet you'd do all right over time.
00:08:02.260 I bet you'd do all right.
00:08:04.080 Yeah.
00:08:06.160 But again, don't follow that because that's an unproven technique.
00:08:09.500 Now, Elon Musk has said that the Neuralink chips, that they actually dig a little bit out of your skull, I believe,
00:08:19.120 put the chip into your skull and, I don't know, patch it up somehow.
00:08:23.380 And they're going to use it first for quadriplegics.
00:08:26.920 So the quadriplegics, in theory, would be able to think what they wanted,
00:08:33.220 and then devices that could read the Neuralink connection, apparently, would respond.
00:08:39.960 So in other words, if you had no arms and no legs, you could still turn on your television and change the channels.
00:08:45.900 That sort of thing.
00:08:47.960 To which I said, we have reached the age of magic.
00:08:53.240 This is the age of magic.
00:08:55.560 Where if somebody came to our planet and observed us, let's say 10 years,
00:08:59.980 they would see us just walking into a room and the lights come on.
00:09:03.980 They'd see that the TV would come on to the channel we wanted just because we looked at it.
00:09:08.220 Everything around us will respond to our thoughts in 10 years.
00:09:14.400 Our thoughts.
00:09:16.380 Just try to process that.
00:09:19.380 That the technology already exists to control your environment with your thoughts.
00:09:26.360 Now, we don't know if it's safe yet.
00:09:28.180 That's part of the whole FDA approval process and everything else.
00:09:32.060 So we could have some surprises, but it looks like we're going to control our environment with our thoughts.
00:09:42.240 Now, imagine the military application.
00:09:45.500 Could you imagine, because I feel like this could happen,
00:09:51.600 that a military person who has the chip could simply look at a, let's say, a tank and call in a strike.
00:10:03.440 Just look at it.
00:10:04.580 Just look at the tank and say, die.
00:10:07.020 And a missile comes in from somewhere and just keys on where he's looking.
00:10:15.580 Literally figures out, you know, triangulates from the two eyes and figures out exactly where that is and then destroys it.
00:10:24.360 I think that's going to happen.
00:10:25.540 So all kinds of fun things that Elon Musk has planned for society, we shall see.
00:10:33.860 So you heard that Don Lemon was apparently texting with Jussie Smollett at about the time of the attacks.
00:10:40.880 A number of times they were talking to each other.
00:10:45.860 But it makes you wonder what they were talking about.
00:10:48.820 Because, have you noticed that, first of all, they're basically the same person, but one has a beard?
00:10:58.440 Has anybody noticed that yet?
00:11:01.040 They're pretty much the same person, but one has a beard.
00:11:05.880 What is Jussie Smollett most famous for?
00:11:10.100 A hoax.
00:11:11.780 What is Don Lemon most famous for?
00:11:15.860 Oh, hoaxes.
00:11:17.380 Turns out they have a lot in common.
00:11:20.680 So I wonder if they have some kind of a support group for hoaxers who have been caught.
00:11:27.360 Now, Don Lemon still has his job, which is weird.
00:11:31.740 If I had to bet who was going to go first, Don Lemon or Chris Cuomo, I would have bet Lemon.
00:11:38.400 He already had, you know, allegations against him that look pretty bad.
00:11:42.120 But he's hanging in there.
00:11:43.260 So the two hoax twins, the hoax brothers, Don Lemon and Jussie, I guess they're buddies.
00:11:51.240 Have you ever noticed that whenever science comes up with a new cool drug to fix something,
00:11:59.320 the side effect is always, but you can't have sex.
00:12:02.520 It's like, we have this chemical that will help you regrow hair, man, but it's going to ruin your ability to have sex.
00:12:13.020 We can make that pain go away, but you're not going to be able to have sex.
00:12:18.120 You know that skin problem you've got?
00:12:22.120 We've got a cure for that, but you won't be able to have sex.
00:12:27.600 I'm right, right?
00:12:28.320 It's like every drug makes you unable to have sex until the golden age.
00:12:33.800 What does the golden age look like?
00:12:35.640 Well, it looks like this.
00:12:36.680 Apparently, people who are on Viagra, or the generic Viagra, is linked to an almost 70% lower risk of Alzheimer's.
00:12:51.280 That's pretty good, 70%.
00:12:53.420 Now, they don't know yet if it's a cause, or just correlated,
00:12:56.720 but there's a strong suggestion that it might be causal,
00:13:01.480 which brings us to the following possibility in the near term,
00:13:07.300 that we're going to have a lot of 80-year-old citizens.
00:13:10.860 They're 80 years old, and because they're on the Viagra,
00:13:14.860 they don't have the Alzheimer's, so their minds are perfectly clear,
00:13:18.380 and they're hard as rocks.
00:13:23.000 And absolutely nobody in the world will want to have sex with them.
00:13:26.720 Which they will clearly understand, because their minds will be so clear,
00:13:32.000 and their boners will be so raging,
00:13:34.820 that they will be in this torturous entity,
00:13:38.480 kind of a living hell,
00:13:40.420 where all you want to do is have sex,
00:13:43.860 but nobody wants to have it with you.
00:13:47.080 So, good and the bad.
00:13:49.680 Good and the bad.
00:13:51.460 Well, there's a Rasmussen poll on Kamala Harris.
00:13:54.120 See how popular she is.
00:13:56.740 And here are the results.
00:13:57.700 19% said, very favorable.
00:14:00.920 That's right.
00:14:01.900 19% have looked at Kamala Harris' performance
00:14:05.220 and said to themselves,
00:14:07.100 I need more of that.
00:14:09.260 I need more of that.
00:14:11.740 And 4% said they don't know,
00:14:14.900 which seems roughly the same number of American citizens
00:14:18.460 who wouldn't be able to name the vice president if he asked.
00:14:22.200 So, who's the vice president of the United States?
00:14:27.740 Dan Coyle?
00:14:29.260 I don't know.
00:14:30.520 So, if you were to add together
00:14:32.340 the very favorable with the 4% who don't know who the vice president is,
00:14:39.060 you'd get about 23%.
00:14:41.200 23%.
00:14:44.760 That's just about the 25% that get every poll number wrong
00:14:49.440 or every poll question wrong.
00:14:52.120 50% have a very unfavorable opinion of the vice president.
00:14:56.460 Very unfavorable.
00:14:57.380 So, the favorables,
00:15:00.260 if you add together the favorite categories,
00:15:02.180 it'd be 39% favorable
00:15:04.040 with 57% that are leaning unfavorable.
00:15:08.960 That's not even close.
00:15:11.080 Not even close.
00:15:11.940 All right, here's my advice.
00:15:15.340 I've given you this before,
00:15:16.640 but I feel it's necessary.
00:15:18.880 That whenever you see rogue doctors,
00:15:22.120 the ones who are disagreeing with the mainstream advice,
00:15:26.900 I give them a 5% chance of being right,
00:15:30.200 regardless of the topic.
00:15:32.780 Right?
00:15:33.420 So, if the topic is who knows what,
00:15:36.280 it doesn't matter,
00:15:37.080 and it could be scientists or medical professionals,
00:15:40.160 but the rogues who disagree with the mainstream,
00:15:44.200 on average,
00:15:45.440 and this is a life experience thing,
00:15:47.280 this is not based on some data
00:15:48.760 that you could ask me for,
00:15:50.480 just my observation.
00:15:52.560 Of all the people I've seen as the rogues,
00:15:55.900 I'd say they're right about 5% of the time.
00:15:59.000 Why 5?
00:15:59.840 I mean, I'm making up numbers.
00:16:02.200 I mean, you can say 10%, whatever,
00:16:04.380 but it's a low number.
00:16:06.580 So, if the only thing you knew
00:16:08.640 is that the mainstream whatever believed X,
00:16:12.320 and there was a rogue doctor,
00:16:14.580 or even several,
00:16:15.820 even several rogue doctors,
00:16:17.480 and they have a different opinion,
00:16:19.700 there's about a 95% chance they're wrong.
00:16:23.120 Now, why do you think it's higher?
00:16:26.340 What would make you think
00:16:27.580 that the rogues,
00:16:29.360 the ones who disagree,
00:16:30.820 why would you think
00:16:31.800 that they're right more than 5%?
00:16:34.060 Maybe they are,
00:16:34.760 but why would you think that?
00:16:37.100 What would be your evidence
00:16:38.800 to suggest that the rogues
00:16:41.540 would be right,
00:16:43.440 and then what percentage higher than 5%?
00:16:47.020 Because clocks are right twice a day,
00:16:49.840 censorship of competing narrative,
00:16:54.060 contrarian investing
00:16:56.940 is the same as rogue doctors?
00:16:58.460 No, that's an analogy,
00:17:00.180 and analogies are not part of reason.
00:17:01.780 Facts,
00:17:06.860 are you a rogue?
00:17:10.440 I am a rogue.
00:17:12.040 So, here's how you can tell
00:17:13.100 the difference between
00:17:14.100 the rogues
00:17:16.700 and the people
00:17:18.100 who are just right
00:17:18.940 more often than not.
00:17:20.740 Track record.
00:17:22.180 The first time I predicted
00:17:23.700 that Trump would win
00:17:25.320 the election in 2016,
00:17:26.860 should you have believed me?
00:17:28.020 I wouldn't have.
00:17:32.620 Because you didn't know
00:17:33.420 anything about me, right?
00:17:35.240 I gave you my argument.
00:17:36.620 I told you why
00:17:37.320 I thought he'd win.
00:17:38.400 But should you have believed me?
00:17:41.040 I don't think so.
00:17:42.420 I mean, not in the beginning.
00:17:43.820 Should you believe me now
00:17:44.940 if I make a prediction?
00:17:46.540 Well, not believe me,
00:17:48.100 because a prediction
00:17:48.760 is just statistical
00:17:50.080 sort of thing.
00:17:51.260 But would I be more credible now
00:17:53.280 that you've watched
00:17:54.840 my track record
00:17:55.880 of predicting
00:17:57.280 the hard to predict?
00:17:59.100 I would say
00:17:59.640 that my track record
00:18:00.420 is the best I've ever seen.
00:18:02.440 I can't think of anybody
00:18:03.300 who's even close.
00:18:04.660 So, if you look at somebody
00:18:05.700 who consistently
00:18:06.660 is a rogue
00:18:08.660 and gets it right,
00:18:10.640 then that would be
00:18:11.200 a special case.
00:18:12.740 If you don't know anything
00:18:14.160 about the doctor
00:18:15.120 the same way
00:18:16.180 you wouldn't have known
00:18:16.820 anything about me
00:18:17.620 the first year you saw me,
00:18:20.720 why would you bet
00:18:21.680 on somebody like me?
00:18:24.200 Like, even if I have
00:18:26.360 a good argument.
00:18:28.140 It's a bad bat.
00:18:30.100 But sometimes
00:18:30.800 the 5% comes through.
00:18:33.240 The reason that you think
00:18:34.380 the rogues are likely
00:18:36.180 to be right,
00:18:37.840 or even if you give them
00:18:39.420 great credibility,
00:18:41.060 is because they get
00:18:42.160 a lot of attention.
00:18:43.960 And you remember
00:18:44.820 the times that the rogues
00:18:46.360 were right.
00:18:48.340 Right?
00:18:49.140 If somebody disagrees
00:18:51.080 with the mainstream
00:18:51.720 and they turn out
00:18:52.420 to be wrong,
00:18:53.040 well, you just never
00:18:54.080 hear of them again.
00:18:55.620 But if they turn out
00:18:56.480 to be right,
00:18:57.180 they're celebrated,
00:18:58.200 you know, geniuses
00:18:59.460 that got everything right.
00:19:01.300 So, of course,
00:19:02.640 your impression
00:19:04.060 of how correct
00:19:05.280 the rogue doctors are
00:19:07.660 is probably really,
00:19:09.560 really exaggerated
00:19:10.420 by observation.
00:19:13.100 Meaning that you see
00:19:14.760 the rogues being right
00:19:15.880 way more than they are
00:19:16.940 normally right.
00:19:19.480 All right.
00:19:19.680 So, I can't support
00:19:21.340 my 5% number.
00:19:22.680 I'm just saying
00:19:23.140 it's experiential.
00:19:24.940 But if you have
00:19:25.720 a high confidence
00:19:27.540 in the people,
00:19:28.860 let's say more than 50%,
00:19:30.260 if your confidence
00:19:32.000 in the rogue doctors
00:19:33.280 is more than 50%,
00:19:34.620 I would say
00:19:35.500 that's not supportable
00:19:36.600 based on any experience
00:19:39.240 you've had
00:19:39.820 and any experience
00:19:41.220 I've had.
00:19:41.920 It's just not supportable.
00:19:43.440 But, does that mean
00:19:44.540 the rogue doctors
00:19:45.660 are wrong?
00:19:46.500 No.
00:19:47.700 No.
00:19:49.100 No, no, no.
00:19:50.540 They could be totally right.
00:19:52.500 Sometimes they're right.
00:19:53.620 About 5%
00:19:54.320 in my experience.
00:19:56.640 So, just keep that in mind.
00:19:58.300 And you don't have to use
00:19:59.280 my estimate of 5%.
00:20:01.020 Use your own.
00:20:02.940 But that's just the way
00:20:03.720 you should think of it.
00:20:05.300 Because you can't really
00:20:06.400 untangle what these experts say
00:20:08.040 compared to what
00:20:09.120 the other experts say.
00:20:10.140 We're not smart enough
00:20:11.140 to do that.
00:20:12.500 So, just know that.
00:20:14.360 So, I was seeing some videos
00:20:16.400 of the so-called
00:20:18.100 Australian penal colonies
00:20:19.680 for COVID people
00:20:21.540 where they have to go to them
00:20:22.620 and stay there for,
00:20:25.840 is it two weeks?
00:20:26.820 Can somebody give me...
00:20:28.460 I asked that question
00:20:29.340 on Twitter
00:20:29.780 and then somebody thought
00:20:30.700 I was in favor
00:20:31.380 of penal colonies.
00:20:33.500 But it's two weeks,
00:20:34.420 14 days, yeah.
00:20:35.680 So, how many of you
00:20:36.640 have seen the video
00:20:37.880 of what they look like
00:20:39.360 on the inside?
00:20:40.700 So, everybody gets
00:20:42.260 a private,
00:20:43.840 sort of a little
00:20:44.620 private cabin-y thing.
00:20:47.140 I think they have
00:20:47.980 their own bathroom.
00:20:48.800 They should, right?
00:20:49.560 They're trying to
00:20:50.200 keep them away from people.
00:20:52.860 And it's basically
00:20:54.600 a cheap hotel room,
00:20:56.480 it looks like.
00:20:58.080 Wouldn't you say?
00:20:59.700 Now, here's my question.
00:21:03.680 How many people
00:21:04.540 would be happier
00:21:05.660 going there for two weeks
00:21:06.940 than their normal life?
00:21:08.140 What do you think?
00:21:11.700 Because,
00:21:12.980 is there anybody
00:21:14.740 who just works
00:21:15.380 all the time?
00:21:17.400 A lot of us work
00:21:18.500 basically from
00:21:19.920 God-awful morning
00:21:21.460 till God-awful night, right?
00:21:23.920 Aren't there a lot of you
00:21:24.900 who work
00:21:25.880 from the moment
00:21:27.140 you get up
00:21:27.880 to the time
00:21:28.660 you flop in bed
00:21:29.720 and exhausted?
00:21:31.680 That's a lot of us, right?
00:21:33.420 A lot of us do that
00:21:34.540 because you're working,
00:21:35.340 then there's kids
00:21:36.000 or there's other
00:21:36.720 responsibilities.
00:21:38.640 How many of you
00:21:39.800 would say to yourself,
00:21:40.700 and I want to be
00:21:42.520 really clear,
00:21:43.260 I'm not supporting
00:21:44.220 these Australian
00:21:46.400 penal colonies.
00:21:47.800 I'm simply curious.
00:21:49.900 This is just curiosity.
00:21:51.620 I'm not promoting them.
00:21:53.120 I'm not promoting
00:21:53.900 the vaccination.
00:21:55.480 You know,
00:21:55.680 we're just talking here.
00:21:57.080 But how many of you
00:21:58.000 would say to yourself,
00:21:58.820 I could take two weeks
00:22:00.440 in that cabin
00:22:01.200 and if I had my phone
00:22:03.080 and some entertainment,
00:22:05.520 I think I could take
00:22:06.920 two weeks in that cabin.
00:22:10.180 Now, most of you
00:22:11.120 would say,
00:22:11.500 hell no,
00:22:11.880 of course.
00:22:12.680 But is there anybody here
00:22:13.940 who would say,
00:22:15.000 yeah,
00:22:15.240 I could do that?
00:22:18.520 So I'm seeing people
00:22:19.740 say yes.
00:22:21.420 Now,
00:22:21.800 I would assume
00:22:22.280 most of you
00:22:24.140 would say no
00:22:24.780 and most of you
00:22:26.160 would want to
00:22:26.600 shut it down,
00:22:27.180 right?
00:22:28.220 And I appreciate
00:22:29.240 that opinion.
00:22:30.980 I do appreciate that.
00:22:32.720 But,
00:22:33.840 those of you
00:22:34.760 who are sure
00:22:35.520 that they've created
00:22:36.340 a hellscape,
00:22:38.100 I doubt it.
00:22:39.400 I doubt it.
00:22:40.860 I think it's
00:22:41.600 an inconvenience
00:22:42.580 that most of you
00:22:44.280 wouldn't want
00:22:44.980 and you're worried
00:22:45.980 that it will turn
00:22:46.620 into something bigger,
00:22:48.120 of course.
00:22:49.580 But I think
00:22:50.280 this story
00:22:50.740 is way overblown.
00:22:52.760 Now,
00:22:53.840 just to be clear,
00:22:55.620 I don't favor it
00:22:56.680 and I don't favor
00:22:57.880 mandates in general.
00:22:59.660 So,
00:23:00.240 I'm not in favor of it
00:23:01.380 but I think
00:23:02.680 the story
00:23:03.440 of how bad it is
00:23:04.560 is greatly exaggerated.
00:23:06.680 But,
00:23:07.160 having said that,
00:23:08.200 it would be terrible
00:23:08.960 for some individuals
00:23:10.060 and other people
00:23:11.920 would just go in there
00:23:12.700 and say,
00:23:13.020 two weeks
00:23:14.080 without working,
00:23:15.220 two weeks
00:23:15.620 without my family,
00:23:17.060 I could do that.
00:23:20.080 Somebody said
00:23:20.720 it's a porn addicts
00:23:22.480 four seasons resort.
00:23:26.900 That's pretty funny.
00:23:33.840 Who's messaging me?
00:23:35.940 All right.
00:23:38.860 Drake,
00:23:40.100 the artist Drake
00:23:41.360 has withdrawn
00:23:42.160 his 2021 Grammy nomination.
00:23:45.120 He had two nominations
00:23:46.180 for, I think,
00:23:46.860 Best Album,
00:23:47.620 Rap Album
00:23:48.200 and Best Performer
00:23:50.000 and he withdrew.
00:23:51.640 We don't know why
00:23:52.400 he withdrew
00:23:52.980 his Grammy nominations
00:23:54.320 but I think
00:23:57.120 it's a step
00:23:57.600 in the right direction
00:23:58.320 because,
00:23:59.100 as you know,
00:24:00.560 Drake is the
00:24:01.260 Nickelback of rap.
00:24:04.840 Anybody?
00:24:06.080 Anybody disagree?
00:24:07.900 Drake is the
00:24:08.700 Nickelback of rap.
00:24:13.400 Here's my take
00:24:14.380 on Drake.
00:24:15.320 Now,
00:24:16.380 keep in mind
00:24:17.040 that art
00:24:18.360 is subjective
00:24:19.100 so if I say
00:24:21.000 I don't enjoy
00:24:22.120 a specific artist
00:24:23.880 it doesn't mean
00:24:25.080 they're not great.
00:24:26.700 It's just
00:24:27.380 a personal thing,
00:24:28.140 right?
00:24:29.160 So,
00:24:29.640 Drake is obviously
00:24:32.000 hugely successful
00:24:33.040 and people love him
00:24:34.320 but when I listen
00:24:35.860 to him
00:24:36.160 I can't
00:24:37.200 stand it.
00:24:38.840 I can't stand
00:24:40.040 ten seconds
00:24:40.860 of that guy
00:24:41.520 his board
00:24:43.000 droning
00:24:43.560 that they call
00:24:44.380 some kind
00:24:44.880 of performance.
00:24:46.340 He feels like
00:24:47.120 to me
00:24:47.660 Drake comes off
00:24:48.920 as somebody
00:24:49.660 who wanted
00:24:50.240 to sing
00:24:50.780 but they didn't
00:24:51.440 have the energy
00:24:52.520 for it.
00:24:54.280 I'd really like
00:24:55.200 to sing like Adele
00:24:56.200 but
00:24:56.460 I think all
00:24:58.440 I can do
00:24:59.400 is say this
00:25:00.540 and I'll
00:25:01.720 call it
00:25:02.320 a sound.
00:25:04.380 I am
00:25:05.020 rapping
00:25:05.760 now.
00:25:07.520 Aren't we
00:25:08.020 all energized
00:25:09.220 by my
00:25:10.600 rapping words?
00:25:14.180 I don't know.
00:25:14.680 I get
00:25:16.240 that most
00:25:17.100 of the world
00:25:17.800 who likes
00:25:18.320 this
00:25:19.120 genre
00:25:20.540 music
00:25:20.940 thinks he's
00:25:21.500 pretty great
00:25:22.120 but
00:25:23.200 I don't
00:25:23.740 see it
00:25:24.060 at all.
00:25:25.840 I love
00:25:26.600 Kanye.
00:25:28.320 There's
00:25:28.860 lots of
00:25:29.220 stuff in
00:25:29.580 the genre
00:25:29.980 that I
00:25:30.340 like a lot
00:25:30.860 so it's
00:25:31.540 not like
00:25:31.900 I'm ragging
00:25:33.120 on the
00:25:33.500 genre
00:25:33.840 at all.
00:25:35.200 I like
00:25:35.560 the genre.
00:25:36.780 I just
00:25:37.160 don't get
00:25:37.900 Drake
00:25:39.660 but
00:25:41.040 I'm
00:25:42.320 completely
00:25:42.720 aware
00:25:43.080 that people
00:25:43.600 love him
00:25:44.000 so and
00:25:44.780 that's
00:25:45.080 fine.
00:25:46.180 All right
00:25:46.520 the funniest
00:25:48.940 thing from
00:25:49.400 the Jussie
00:25:49.980 Smollett
00:25:50.460 case was
00:25:51.200 was it
00:25:52.180 was it
00:25:53.280 one of
00:25:53.620 the Nigerian
00:25:55.000 twins
00:25:55.460 who claimed
00:25:58.720 he didn't
00:25:59.080 know the
00:25:59.420 bathhouse
00:25:59.900 was for
00:26:00.360 for gay
00:26:00.900 stuff?
00:26:07.220 I wonder
00:26:09.540 how long
00:26:09.960 it took
00:26:10.220 him to
00:26:10.500 figure it
00:26:10.860 out.
00:26:14.000 So here's
00:26:14.600 a little
00:26:15.140 information
00:26:15.640 for any
00:26:16.740 Nigerian
00:26:17.720 immigrants
00:26:19.320 who come
00:26:20.300 to this
00:26:20.640 country
00:26:20.960 and are
00:26:21.740 confused
00:26:22.320 by bath
00:26:22.900 houses.
00:26:24.280 I'm pretty
00:26:24.820 sure there
00:26:25.340 are no
00:26:25.680 heterosexual
00:26:26.300 bath
00:26:26.760 houses.
00:26:27.940 Am I
00:26:28.560 wrong
00:26:28.880 about that?
00:26:31.280 Is there
00:26:31.900 any such
00:26:32.300 thing as a
00:26:32.800 heterosexual
00:26:33.460 bath house
00:26:34.240 in the
00:26:35.360 United States?
00:26:36.460 In Europe
00:26:37.140 yeah.
00:26:37.960 But not in the
00:26:38.500 United States
00:26:39.080 right?
00:26:40.780 It's called
00:26:41.340 the Y.
00:26:41.760 somebody says
00:26:43.180 but just
00:26:46.000 the just
00:26:47.360 the fact
00:26:47.840 that and
00:26:48.560 apparently
00:26:48.880 there was
00:26:49.560 like gay
00:26:50.180 pornography
00:26:50.660 on the
00:26:51.180 walls of
00:26:51.780 the private
00:26:52.260 room they
00:26:52.740 went to
00:26:53.280 and maybe
00:26:54.440 they had
00:26:54.760 some physical
00:26:55.300 contacts as
00:26:56.280 Jussie but
00:26:56.920 maybe they
00:26:57.340 didn't as
00:26:58.000 one of the
00:26:58.500 twins.
00:27:00.360 But I
00:27:01.100 just love the
00:27:01.620 fact he
00:27:02.020 didn't know
00:27:02.760 it was a
00:27:03.100 place that
00:27:03.560 gay people
00:27:04.100 went.
00:27:04.480 so there's
00:27:07.520 this we
00:27:08.440 have a
00:27:08.680 result in
00:27:09.400 the case
00:27:09.860 of the
00:27:11.720 guy who
00:27:12.140 claims to
00:27:12.700 be the
00:27:12.940 inventor of
00:27:13.460 Bitcoin.
00:27:15.020 You thought
00:27:15.720 it was
00:27:15.960 Satoshi
00:27:16.420 right?
00:27:16.980 The secret
00:27:19.060 name of
00:27:19.560 whoever did
00:27:19.980 it but
00:27:20.320 somebody
00:27:20.740 an Australian
00:27:22.020 computer
00:27:22.520 scientist
00:27:22.940 named Craig
00:27:23.600 Wright he
00:27:25.020 actually won
00:27:25.720 a Miami
00:27:26.160 civil case
00:27:27.040 that pitted
00:27:28.380 him against
00:27:28.940 the family
00:27:30.620 of his late
00:27:31.080 business partner
00:27:31.720 and I
00:27:32.780 guess the
00:27:33.040 business
00:27:33.320 partner was
00:27:33.900 claiming he
00:27:34.420 was also
00:27:35.100 a part
00:27:35.900 inventor but
00:27:36.660 he lost
00:27:37.080 that.
00:27:38.000 So Craig
00:27:38.460 Wright that
00:27:40.020 doesn't mean
00:27:40.600 he's the
00:27:40.980 inventor but
00:27:43.220 he said if
00:27:43.900 he lost the
00:27:44.600 case he
00:27:45.160 would reveal
00:27:45.800 that all
00:27:47.300 of his
00:27:47.540 holdings and
00:27:48.180 show that he
00:27:48.600 was really
00:27:49.520 Satoshi I
00:27:50.220 guess but
00:27:50.600 he didn't
00:27:51.100 lose so he
00:27:53.220 didn't have to
00:27:53.640 do that so
00:27:54.840 we still don't
00:27:55.480 quite know if
00:27:56.280 he is.
00:27:57.000 What do you
00:27:57.380 think?
00:27:59.940 Did
00:28:00.220 Craig's
00:28:02.380 been debunked
00:28:03.100 in the
00:28:03.340 crypto world
00:28:04.080 for years
00:28:04.640 somebody says.
00:28:07.500 He's not
00:28:08.160 the inventor.
00:28:10.940 All right
00:28:11.260 I'm going to
00:28:13.640 say I'm
00:28:13.980 skeptical of
00:28:15.200 his claim but
00:28:16.080 I don't have
00:28:16.580 any insight
00:28:17.240 into it at
00:28:17.780 all.
00:28:19.000 Seems like
00:28:19.680 it'd be easy
00:28:20.160 to prove
00:28:20.800 because he'd
00:28:22.300 have a few
00:28:22.740 billion dollars
00:28:23.480 to play with
00:28:24.580 wouldn't he?
00:28:26.140 If Craig
00:28:27.420 Wright is not
00:28:28.220 living like a
00:28:28.960 billionaire
00:28:29.280 billionaire I've
00:28:30.500 got some
00:28:30.920 questions about
00:28:31.740 his claim.
00:28:34.340 All right.
00:28:37.260 So let's
00:28:38.160 talk about
00:28:38.560 rapid tests.
00:28:41.620 We still
00:28:42.360 don't have
00:28:42.860 cheap rapid
00:28:43.540 tests.
00:28:43.920 We have
00:28:44.120 rapid tests
00:28:44.660 but they're
00:28:45.100 way expensive
00:28:45.900 and Jen
00:28:48.060 Psaki answered
00:28:49.740 a question about
00:28:50.420 rapid tests by
00:28:51.400 mocking the
00:28:52.140 reporter and
00:28:53.440 saying what
00:28:54.760 do you think
00:28:55.880 we should do?
00:28:56.440 send out a
00:28:59.120 rapid test to
00:29:00.040 every household
00:29:00.800 to which
00:29:02.880 everybody smart
00:29:03.780 thought yes
00:29:05.840 yes
00:29:07.660 that's pretty
00:29:09.480 much exactly
00:29:10.220 what we're
00:29:10.680 asking
00:29:11.000 because otherwise
00:29:13.140 you can't get
00:29:13.780 past the
00:29:14.260 pandemic.
00:29:15.660 So yes
00:29:16.180 yes
00:29:17.520 and why is
00:29:18.920 she mocking
00:29:19.540 literally the
00:29:21.160 only way past
00:29:21.860 the pandemic
00:29:22.520 that I can
00:29:23.040 see?
00:29:24.480 I don't
00:29:25.120 know.
00:29:26.120 But there
00:29:27.560 is some
00:29:27.980 intrigue over
00:29:28.920 the question
00:29:29.420 of why the
00:29:30.160 U.S.
00:29:30.840 alone was
00:29:31.740 unable to do
00:29:32.440 this thing
00:29:32.920 that we would
00:29:33.440 normally be
00:29:34.000 good at
00:29:34.500 which is
00:29:35.640 approving
00:29:36.160 stuff in a
00:29:37.020 pandemic.
00:29:38.000 You know we
00:29:38.320 did these
00:29:38.980 vaccinations if
00:29:40.000 you call them
00:29:40.380 that in the
00:29:41.360 pandemic.
00:29:42.580 So obviously
00:29:43.900 we had the
00:29:44.720 capability to
00:29:45.820 do this.
00:29:47.200 Don't you
00:29:47.860 think?
00:29:48.140 And it's
00:29:49.480 being blamed
00:29:50.100 on incompetence
00:29:51.360 and bureaucracy.
00:29:55.400 I don't
00:29:56.120 know.
00:29:57.160 I'm not
00:29:57.640 buying it.
00:29:59.000 Sorry.
00:30:00.200 Don't buy it
00:30:01.220 for a second.
00:30:02.800 Clearly
00:30:03.220 there's corruption
00:30:04.100 going on here
00:30:05.000 somewhere.
00:30:06.020 I don't know
00:30:06.700 who.
00:30:07.200 I don't know
00:30:07.680 where.
00:30:08.520 But clearly
00:30:09.240 this is
00:30:09.720 corruption.
00:30:10.740 And if
00:30:11.100 there's nobody
00:30:11.580 digging into
00:30:12.240 this to find
00:30:13.080 out what's
00:30:14.580 going on
00:30:15.300 I don't
00:30:18.140 you know
00:30:19.880 this is a
00:30:21.540 big miss.
00:30:22.500 I mean I
00:30:22.760 think there's
00:30:23.660 awards for
00:30:25.180 somebody who
00:30:25.740 gets to the
00:30:26.160 bottom of
00:30:26.520 this.
00:30:27.180 Now the
00:30:27.540 obvious question
00:30:28.240 is how
00:30:28.760 can we
00:30:29.160 the public
00:30:29.720 know which
00:30:31.500 of the
00:30:31.840 decision makers
00:30:32.680 in the
00:30:33.040 government are
00:30:33.760 associated with
00:30:34.720 any of the
00:30:35.240 pharma companies.
00:30:37.160 I did read an
00:30:38.280 article that said
00:30:38.960 that the
00:30:39.660 gentleman who's
00:30:40.780 responsible for
00:30:42.540 recommending
00:30:43.180 which rapid
00:30:44.420 tests are
00:30:45.260 considered or
00:30:47.040 whatever
00:30:47.300 he did have
00:30:49.180 some
00:30:49.620 association
00:30:51.080 with Abbott
00:30:52.140 in the past
00:30:53.180 but we don't
00:30:54.320 know that he
00:30:54.760 owns any
00:30:55.160 stock.
00:30:55.760 I think he
00:30:56.120 doesn't.
00:30:57.520 But he had a
00:30:58.520 close association
00:30:59.360 with the only
00:31:00.020 one that got
00:31:00.840 quickly approved
00:31:01.920 in the past.
00:31:03.100 He had done
00:31:03.480 some work with
00:31:04.020 them.
00:31:05.140 So that
00:31:07.300 seems like
00:31:07.820 something I
00:31:08.420 don't want to
00:31:08.720 know more
00:31:09.060 about.
00:31:09.960 Wouldn't
00:31:10.260 you?
00:31:11.640 And I would
00:31:12.460 just put this
00:31:13.140 out there.
00:31:13.540 The way that
00:31:14.820 people do
00:31:16.820 illegal things
00:31:17.740 is not just
00:31:18.720 by owning
00:31:19.400 the stock.
00:31:20.780 You could
00:31:21.460 have a family
00:31:22.020 member own
00:31:22.540 the stock
00:31:23.100 and I don't
00:31:23.900 know that
00:31:24.200 anybody would
00:31:24.660 know.
00:31:25.300 Would they?
00:31:26.360 If your
00:31:27.060 spouse owned
00:31:27.820 the stock
00:31:28.240 but you
00:31:28.580 didn't,
00:31:28.920 would anybody
00:31:29.280 know?
00:31:30.640 How about
00:31:30.960 if it was
00:31:31.340 your brother?
00:31:32.420 Would anybody
00:31:32.940 know?
00:31:34.460 The SEC
00:31:35.240 would know?
00:31:36.560 If it's
00:31:37.260 a spouse.
00:31:37.660 How about
00:31:39.940 this?
00:31:42.260 Suppose this
00:31:43.140 gentleman wanted
00:31:44.000 to go do
00:31:45.500 some work for
00:31:46.140 Abbott in
00:31:46.580 the future
00:31:47.000 after making
00:31:49.780 them $1.9
00:31:50.860 billion on
00:31:51.860 rapid tests.
00:31:53.680 Do you think
00:31:54.140 he would get
00:31:54.560 that job?
00:31:55.340 Do you think
00:31:55.680 Abbott would
00:31:56.140 say, yeah,
00:31:56.580 you're hired.
00:31:57.680 You just
00:31:58.280 made us $1.9
00:31:59.280 billion there.
00:32:00.180 Thanks.
00:32:01.160 We will hire
00:32:01.740 you to consult
00:32:02.480 for any price
00:32:03.240 you want.
00:32:04.900 What do you
00:32:05.560 think?
00:32:07.520 Now, the
00:32:08.840 trouble is
00:32:09.540 that that
00:32:10.540 wouldn't be
00:32:11.000 illegal, would
00:32:11.620 it?
00:32:11.800 It wouldn't
00:32:13.240 be illegal
00:32:13.780 simply to
00:32:14.460 understand that
00:32:16.180 if he worked
00:32:16.860 for Abbott in
00:32:17.540 the future,
00:32:18.240 they would be
00:32:18.760 likely to say
00:32:19.600 yes to
00:32:20.040 whatever he
00:32:20.500 offered.
00:32:21.680 That's not
00:32:22.420 illegal, is
00:32:23.980 it?
00:32:25.300 So, there
00:32:27.020 are a whole
00:32:27.360 bunch of
00:32:28.340 ways corruption
00:32:29.360 can happen in
00:32:30.300 this situation,
00:32:31.100 and they don't
00:32:31.540 all involve
00:32:32.160 owning stock.
00:32:34.220 So, follow
00:32:35.480 the money, but
00:32:36.160 it gets really
00:32:36.680 hard to follow
00:32:37.660 it when you're
00:32:38.780 talking about
00:32:39.440 just understood
00:32:41.060 arrangements.
00:32:42.400 Let me give
00:32:42.840 you another
00:32:43.120 example.
00:32:44.400 Let's say
00:32:44.920 that the
00:32:45.520 person responsible
00:32:46.920 for the rapid
00:32:47.700 tests in the
00:32:48.600 government did
00:32:50.640 not accept any
00:32:51.440 money from
00:32:51.860 anybody, did
00:32:52.780 not own any
00:32:53.500 stock, but he
00:32:55.640 knew that he
00:32:56.100 was going to
00:32:56.480 start a
00:32:56.880 startup soon,
00:32:57.680 and he might
00:32:59.200 want one of
00:32:59.740 the existing
00:33:00.340 pharma companies
00:33:01.260 to foot the
00:33:02.860 money.
00:33:03.100 could you
00:33:05.960 detect that?
00:33:08.520 Is there
00:33:09.060 any way to
00:33:09.540 find out that
00:33:10.220 there was a
00:33:10.600 private conversation
00:33:11.500 in which
00:33:12.040 somebody said,
00:33:12.580 you know, if
00:33:13.760 you give us a
00:33:14.360 little runway
00:33:15.180 here on these
00:33:16.040 rapid tests,
00:33:18.240 we're likely to
00:33:19.600 fund your
00:33:20.540 startup, should
00:33:22.300 you have one
00:33:22.840 in the future.
00:33:24.300 Now, I don't
00:33:24.820 think anybody
00:33:25.200 said that.
00:33:26.540 Like, I'm not
00:33:27.460 alleging that
00:33:28.020 anything like
00:33:28.480 that happened.
00:33:29.320 I'm just saying
00:33:29.880 that there are
00:33:30.340 a thousand ways
00:33:31.460 to be corrupt
00:33:34.020 that would be
00:33:35.120 hard to detect.
00:33:37.720 Right?
00:33:38.600 So I'm not
00:33:39.320 mind-reading, I'm
00:33:40.480 speculating about
00:33:41.660 possibilities.
00:33:43.020 Mind-reading would
00:33:43.780 be, I know what
00:33:45.060 happened.
00:33:46.540 Speculating would
00:33:47.300 be, you know,
00:33:48.560 there are a hundred
00:33:49.060 ways that this
00:33:49.780 could go wrong.
00:33:51.540 We better look
00:33:52.200 into it.
00:33:54.000 All right, so I
00:33:54.940 got big questions
00:33:55.940 on that, and that
00:33:56.920 looks like corruption
00:33:57.620 to me.
00:33:59.900 Weirdly, the
00:34:00.680 White House
00:34:01.260 there was some
00:34:02.960 kind of, I
00:34:05.580 guess, a
00:34:05.900 committee that
00:34:06.480 came up with
00:34:07.100 some recommendations,
00:34:08.660 and the White
00:34:09.220 House ended up
00:34:09.880 flagging the
00:34:11.160 art industry as
00:34:13.200 a special industry
00:34:14.160 where there's a
00:34:14.740 lot of corruption
00:34:15.300 because you can
00:34:16.720 launder money
00:34:17.360 through art just
00:34:18.460 by overpaying
00:34:19.360 for art,
00:34:20.120 basically.
00:34:21.200 So you just pay
00:34:21.880 too much for art
00:34:22.680 and you can get
00:34:23.580 your illegal money
00:34:24.520 back into the
00:34:25.260 legal system,
00:34:26.440 which is what
00:34:27.280 laundering does.
00:34:27.960 And they're
00:34:30.240 flagging our
00:34:31.360 industry as a
00:34:32.400 money laundering
00:34:33.980 entity.
00:34:35.240 At the same
00:34:35.860 time, Hunter
00:34:36.540 Biden is
00:34:38.220 selling his
00:34:39.600 artwork for
00:34:40.180 half a million
00:34:40.700 dollars to
00:34:41.340 anonymous buyers.
00:34:44.340 How in the world
00:34:45.460 can both these
00:34:46.660 things be happening
00:34:47.360 at the same time?
00:34:48.740 Now, the
00:34:49.920 obvious question
00:34:50.680 to be asked
00:34:51.220 here is,
00:34:52.660 is there anything
00:34:54.340 that Hunter
00:34:54.800 couldn't get away
00:34:55.580 with at this
00:34:56.140 point that he
00:34:57.580 could do right
00:34:58.180 in front of
00:34:58.660 you?
00:35:00.480 Because Hunter's
00:35:01.840 alleged improprieties
00:35:04.320 are kind of
00:35:05.760 well-known,
00:35:06.360 right?
00:35:07.260 We know all of
00:35:08.320 his connections
00:35:08.940 to everything.
00:35:11.160 It's almost
00:35:11.880 transparent.
00:35:14.020 And then we
00:35:14.740 see this art
00:35:15.700 thing, which
00:35:16.600 looks super
00:35:18.180 corrupt, but
00:35:19.760 it's all public.
00:35:21.140 We don't know
00:35:21.840 who the buyers
00:35:22.380 are, but we
00:35:22.980 know what the
00:35:23.460 situation is.
00:35:24.380 And I
00:35:26.460 have to ask,
00:35:27.980 does Hunter
00:35:28.760 Biden even need
00:35:29.580 to show
00:35:30.020 identification
00:35:30.720 when he goes
00:35:31.480 to a bank?
00:35:32.980 Or can he
00:35:33.720 just walk
00:35:34.240 behind the
00:35:34.660 counter, go
00:35:36.100 into the
00:35:36.540 vault, load
00:35:38.220 up a pallet
00:35:39.040 with dollars,
00:35:39.880 and walk out
00:35:40.640 with it?
00:35:42.100 And then
00:35:42.700 somebody will
00:35:43.140 say, well,
00:35:43.880 we've got this
00:35:44.440 story about
00:35:44.920 Hunter Biden.
00:35:45.560 He walked
00:35:45.920 into a bank
00:35:46.480 and took a
00:35:46.920 pallet of
00:35:47.320 cash.
00:35:48.720 And then
00:35:49.280 you're waiting
00:35:49.580 for the rest
00:35:50.100 of the story
00:35:50.600 where he gets
00:35:51.060 indicted and
00:35:51.700 arrested.
00:35:52.720 And it
00:35:53.200 just doesn't
00:35:53.600 happen?
00:35:54.380 And then
00:35:55.200 you check
00:35:55.480 back tomorrow
00:35:56.020 and say,
00:35:56.300 oh, man,
00:35:56.660 he's going
00:35:56.940 to be
00:35:57.100 indicted.
00:35:58.660 Well, he's
00:35:59.260 not indicted.
00:36:00.400 Is there
00:36:00.960 anything this
00:36:01.560 guy can do?
00:36:03.280 What exactly
00:36:04.280 would it
00:36:05.240 take for
00:36:07.120 him to
00:36:07.540 be, you
00:36:08.200 know,
00:36:08.960 stopped?
00:36:11.320 So we're
00:36:12.380 defunding the
00:36:13.140 police at the
00:36:13.800 same time
00:36:14.280 Hunter's
00:36:14.700 running wild.
00:36:16.860 Not really
00:36:17.560 a related
00:36:18.040 story, but
00:36:18.700 it was
00:36:19.020 funny.
00:36:19.300 All right,
00:36:21.880 so we
00:36:22.160 should do
00:36:22.440 a tweet
00:36:22.920 on what
00:36:23.500 could Hunter
00:36:24.140 get away
00:36:24.640 with based
00:36:25.680 on what
00:36:26.040 he's already
00:36:26.540 getting away
00:36:27.060 with.
00:36:27.840 I don't
00:36:28.380 know that
00:36:28.700 there's any
00:36:29.080 limit.
00:36:30.160 Remember when
00:36:30.720 Trump said
00:36:31.260 he could
00:36:31.640 shoot somebody
00:36:32.320 on Fifth
00:36:32.760 Avenue?
00:36:33.080 I think
00:36:35.500 Hunter Biden
00:36:36.180 could shoot
00:36:37.900 somebody on
00:36:38.640 Fifth Avenue,
00:36:40.940 have sex
00:36:42.180 with the
00:36:42.760 dead body,
00:36:45.800 snort coke
00:36:46.860 off the
00:36:47.440 corpse in
00:36:49.260 front of
00:36:49.600 100 cameras,
00:36:51.500 and the
00:36:51.900 news would
00:36:52.420 say,
00:36:53.720 better get
00:36:55.080 your
00:36:55.180 vaccinations.
00:36:57.180 All right,
00:36:58.360 I will tell
00:37:00.420 you for
00:37:00.780 anybody who's
00:37:01.400 new, I'm
00:37:01.880 not going
00:37:02.160 to, I
00:37:02.800 I'm not
00:37:03.300 the guy
00:37:03.620 who tells
00:37:04.080 you to
00:37:04.300 get vaccinated,
00:37:05.260 it's a
00:37:05.700 personal
00:37:05.980 decision, and
00:37:07.120 I don't
00:37:07.420 care if
00:37:07.880 you do,
00:37:08.680 okay?
00:37:09.440 So when I
00:37:10.300 talk about
00:37:10.780 stuff, I'm
00:37:11.560 talking about
00:37:11.940 the logic
00:37:12.420 of it, I'm
00:37:13.200 not trying to
00:37:13.720 convince you
00:37:14.240 of anything,
00:37:15.260 so just
00:37:16.000 keep that in
00:37:16.520 mind.
00:37:17.240 But here's
00:37:17.700 the things
00:37:18.120 that we
00:37:18.440 all know,
00:37:20.680 and I
00:37:21.560 think we
00:37:21.860 all know
00:37:22.180 this.
00:37:22.880 So this
00:37:23.320 would be
00:37:23.920 based on
00:37:24.420 the consensus
00:37:26.120 of science.
00:37:27.700 So when I
00:37:28.420 say we all
00:37:28.980 know it,
00:37:30.520 what I mean
00:37:31.180 is that we
00:37:32.260 know that
00:37:32.700 science is
00:37:33.360 telling us
00:37:33.880 it's true,
00:37:34.500 which is
00:37:35.060 different from
00:37:35.500 being true.
00:37:36.820 We all
00:37:37.340 know that,
00:37:37.800 right?
00:37:38.580 But this
00:37:39.140 is what they
00:37:39.800 tell us
00:37:40.320 is true,
00:37:41.040 that the
00:37:41.660 vaccinations
00:37:42.240 greatly reduce
00:37:43.400 your risk
00:37:44.020 of hospitalization
00:37:46.920 and death,
00:37:47.860 and that they
00:37:48.840 reduce the
00:37:49.480 spread, but
00:37:50.600 they don't
00:37:50.820 stop it.
00:37:52.780 Now that's
00:37:53.280 that's
00:37:54.100 the BS
00:37:55.960 starts now.
00:37:58.200 Goodbye,
00:37:58.860 Andrew, for
00:37:59.440 being an
00:38:00.240 asshole.
00:38:02.020 Assholes get
00:38:02.760 banned.
00:38:07.320 Anybody else
00:38:08.300 want to make
00:38:09.040 an asshole
00:38:09.820 comment about
00:38:10.600 what I'm
00:38:10.960 secretly
00:38:11.540 thinking?
00:38:13.300 Anybody?
00:38:15.100 All right.
00:38:15.740 so the
00:38:17.620 rest of
00:38:17.980 you maybe
00:38:18.340 could be
00:38:18.720 adults and
00:38:19.480 just listen
00:38:19.940 to it
00:38:20.280 before you
00:38:20.780 decide that
00:38:21.340 I'm secretly
00:38:22.180 trying to
00:38:22.780 convince you
00:38:23.300 to get the
00:38:23.880 vaccination.
00:38:25.660 Fucking
00:38:26.140 idiots.
00:38:27.260 All right.
00:38:28.960 So according
00:38:30.060 to the
00:38:31.000 experts, it
00:38:31.860 reduces your
00:38:32.840 hospitalization and
00:38:33.700 death risk to
00:38:35.160 practically nothing,
00:38:36.860 from practically
00:38:37.900 nothing, because
00:38:38.500 it wasn't that
00:38:39.000 high to start,
00:38:40.080 and that the
00:38:41.640 rate of the
00:38:42.080 spread would be
00:38:42.860 less.
00:38:43.920 Now people
00:38:44.460 quite reasonably
00:38:45.340 said, show me
00:38:46.180 your work.
00:38:47.220 How can you
00:38:47.680 say this?
00:38:48.360 Where are those
00:38:48.920 studies?
00:38:49.840 To which I say,
00:38:50.720 don't ask me for
00:38:51.500 studies.
00:38:51.940 I don't believe
00:38:52.360 any studies.
00:38:53.240 I'm telling you
00:38:53.720 what the experts
00:38:54.260 say.
00:38:55.520 That's what they
00:38:56.140 say.
00:38:57.140 Ask them for
00:38:57.660 studies.
00:38:59.500 All right.
00:39:01.220 But then people
00:39:02.120 keep saying that
00:39:03.180 the jabs don't
00:39:04.000 work.
00:39:07.580 What?
00:39:10.080 Why would you
00:39:10.880 say they don't
00:39:11.440 work if you
00:39:12.440 know that
00:39:13.820 basically 100% of
00:39:15.340 experts say that
00:39:16.860 it prevents you
00:39:17.540 from dying or
00:39:18.400 getting badly
00:39:19.020 hospitalized?
00:39:20.240 Why would you
00:39:20.760 say they don't
00:39:21.200 work?
00:39:23.520 That's word
00:39:25.040 thinking.
00:39:26.040 So in my book
00:39:26.620 Loser Think, I
00:39:27.500 talk about this.
00:39:28.820 Word thinking is
00:39:29.740 that you're trying
00:39:30.140 to take a
00:39:30.800 definition and
00:39:32.900 change the
00:39:33.420 definition or
00:39:34.260 use a definition
00:39:35.360 the way you
00:39:35.900 want, and you
00:39:36.820 think that wins
00:39:37.440 an argument.
00:39:39.180 It doesn't.
00:39:40.360 It's just a word
00:39:41.380 you put on
00:39:41.820 something.
00:39:42.880 So if you
00:39:43.700 want to say
00:39:44.100 the vaccination
00:39:45.940 doesn't work,
00:39:49.100 that just means
00:39:49.900 you've defined
00:39:50.560 working a
00:39:51.540 different way.
00:39:52.700 We all know
00:39:53.580 that it doesn't
00:39:54.100 stop the
00:39:56.180 virus, right?
00:39:57.360 There's nobody
00:39:58.120 who's confused
00:39:58.860 about that.
00:40:00.020 We know you
00:40:00.740 can still get
00:40:01.380 it if you're
00:40:01.840 vaccinated, right?
00:40:03.500 Everybody knows
00:40:04.060 that.
00:40:04.760 But why would
00:40:05.320 you say it
00:40:05.700 doesn't work
00:40:06.480 according to
00:40:07.540 the science?
00:40:08.240 Because the
00:40:09.060 people who say
00:40:09.540 it doesn't
00:40:09.960 work are
00:40:11.340 pointing to
00:40:11.900 the studies
00:40:12.420 and the
00:40:12.760 science.
00:40:13.720 But the
00:40:13.980 science says
00:40:14.500 it works.
00:40:16.120 Now, if
00:40:17.280 anybody's coming
00:40:17.900 in late, I'm
00:40:19.700 not telling you
00:40:20.360 to get
00:40:20.640 vaccinated.
00:40:21.940 I'm not telling
00:40:22.600 you not to.
00:40:23.940 I'm just talking
00:40:24.600 about what we
00:40:25.520 know and what
00:40:26.000 we don't.
00:40:26.620 You make your
00:40:27.100 own decisions.
00:40:28.460 Now, this is
00:40:29.320 the worst argument
00:40:30.560 against the
00:40:31.360 vaccinations, to
00:40:32.740 say they don't
00:40:33.400 work.
00:40:33.800 Would you
00:40:35.440 like a good
00:40:36.040 argument?
00:40:37.600 Anybody?
00:40:39.080 I'm going to
00:40:39.660 give you the
00:40:40.180 good argument
00:40:40.880 for not getting
00:40:41.740 vaccinated.
00:40:43.580 All right?
00:40:44.980 Here's the
00:40:45.580 good argument
00:40:46.160 for not getting
00:40:46.820 vaccinated.
00:40:48.380 Nobody knows
00:40:49.140 what the
00:40:49.460 side effects
00:40:49.920 are.
00:40:51.500 You think
00:40:52.300 you're in a
00:40:52.780 demographic that
00:40:53.600 doesn't have
00:40:54.000 much risk.
00:40:55.780 You think
00:40:56.580 natural immunity
00:40:57.580 is going to
00:40:58.500 be better than
00:40:59.080 a vaccination.
00:41:00.600 And you think
00:41:01.300 the government
00:41:01.840 is a liar.
00:41:03.800 And you think
00:41:04.340 that the
00:41:04.660 companies are
00:41:05.500 liars and
00:41:07.260 that they're
00:41:07.560 not telling
00:41:08.040 you all the
00:41:08.500 risks.
00:41:10.320 That's a
00:41:10.920 pretty good
00:41:11.200 argument.
00:41:12.220 Now, it's
00:41:12.720 not the
00:41:13.120 argument that
00:41:13.660 I agree
00:41:14.100 with because
00:41:15.900 my own risk
00:41:16.760 is different
00:41:17.240 than your
00:41:17.660 risk, etc.
00:41:18.460 So my
00:41:19.640 decision about
00:41:20.320 vaccinations
00:41:20.940 shouldn't match
00:41:22.180 yours.
00:41:23.240 You should
00:41:23.660 make your
00:41:24.000 own.
00:41:25.220 But the
00:41:26.420 bad argument
00:41:27.120 is they
00:41:27.520 don't work.
00:41:29.620 When you
00:41:30.360 say they
00:41:30.700 don't work,
00:41:31.400 you don't
00:41:31.840 sound smart,
00:41:33.000 honestly.
00:41:33.800 That sounds
00:41:35.020 just under
00:41:35.580 informed.
00:41:36.880 Because I'm
00:41:38.180 pretty sure
00:41:38.820 we'd know if
00:41:40.540 they didn't
00:41:40.900 make any
00:41:41.320 effect.
00:41:42.860 Like, it
00:41:43.340 seems really
00:41:44.080 clear that
00:41:45.020 the hospitalizations
00:41:46.080 and deaths
00:41:46.620 go way down.
00:41:48.480 Now, what
00:41:49.740 do we know
00:41:50.120 about the
00:41:50.500 side effects?
00:41:51.920 Some of you
00:41:52.580 say, but,
00:41:53.320 but, but,
00:41:53.940 the VAERS
00:41:54.500 database.
00:41:55.620 That's a
00:41:56.160 bad argument.
00:41:57.560 That might
00:41:58.420 be right.
00:41:58.960 But it's a
00:42:00.900 bad argument.
00:42:01.540 Because the
00:42:02.860 VAERS database
00:42:03.640 is not
00:42:04.140 meant to
00:42:04.780 do the
00:42:05.260 thing that
00:42:05.640 you're doing
00:42:06.020 with it,
00:42:06.420 which is
00:42:06.780 looking at
00:42:07.440 it and
00:42:07.640 saying,
00:42:07.960 hey, I
00:42:09.200 guess that's
00:42:09.700 strong evidence
00:42:10.460 that there's
00:42:11.240 problems.
00:42:11.700 It's not
00:42:12.040 meant for
00:42:12.380 that.
00:42:13.400 And we
00:42:13.900 don't, we
00:42:14.220 have no
00:42:14.580 confidence
00:42:15.020 that it's
00:42:16.480 accurate.
00:42:17.560 And once
00:42:18.000 just everybody
00:42:19.300 gets
00:42:19.620 vaccinated,
00:42:20.900 every problem
00:42:21.560 you have
00:42:22.140 will come
00:42:22.520 soon after
00:42:23.020 getting
00:42:23.320 vaccinated,
00:42:24.020 right?
00:42:24.280 So, especially
00:42:26.360 if you have
00:42:26.860 the, so
00:42:29.240 condescending.
00:42:32.860 Sri
00:42:33.400 Insight says,
00:42:34.140 so condescending.
00:42:35.360 What is
00:42:35.920 condescending?
00:42:37.240 I'm talking
00:42:37.740 about the
00:42:38.120 arguments, not
00:42:39.100 the people.
00:42:40.960 The arguments
00:42:42.140 can suck, but
00:42:44.720 the people can
00:42:45.360 be awesome.
00:42:46.380 Are you okay
00:42:46.860 with that?
00:42:48.000 I'm not, I'm
00:42:49.780 not saying that
00:42:50.480 you're dumb or
00:42:52.460 that you're making
00:42:53.000 a wrong decision.
00:42:54.280 I'm not saying
00:42:55.040 that.
00:42:55.760 I'm saying
00:42:56.180 that there's
00:42:56.560 good arguments
00:42:57.180 and bad
00:42:57.560 arguments, and
00:42:58.500 I would like
00:42:59.580 to equate
00:43:00.500 you with
00:43:00.840 the good
00:43:01.100 arguments, so
00:43:02.340 that you can
00:43:02.720 be good
00:43:03.080 people with
00:43:03.520 good arguments.
00:43:04.500 Whichever way
00:43:05.160 you go, use
00:43:06.580 the good
00:43:06.920 argument, okay?
00:43:08.420 Don't use the
00:43:09.000 bad argument.
00:43:10.100 It makes you
00:43:10.720 less likely to
00:43:11.740 persuade.
00:43:12.600 Use the good
00:43:13.140 one.
00:43:14.800 Now, to me
00:43:16.680 it comes down
00:43:17.260 to your unknown
00:43:18.500 risk of the
00:43:19.280 virus itself,
00:43:20.920 compared to
00:43:21.720 the unknown
00:43:22.300 risk of the
00:43:23.240 vaccinations.
00:43:24.280 How many
00:43:25.480 of you think
00:43:26.100 you know
00:43:26.720 which is the
00:43:27.580 bigger risk?
00:43:28.400 No.
00:43:29.580 Not guessing,
00:43:30.980 not assuming,
00:43:31.760 not a hunch,
00:43:33.160 but how many
00:43:33.680 of you think
00:43:34.200 you know
00:43:34.980 which is the
00:43:36.480 biggest risk?
00:43:37.380 The vaccination
00:43:37.960 itself, or
00:43:39.560 the virus
00:43:41.420 itself?
00:43:42.940 How many
00:43:43.400 of you know
00:43:44.400 is the
00:43:45.280 bigger risk?
00:43:52.320 No one
00:43:52.960 does, no
00:43:53.700 one does.
00:43:56.320 Somebody says
00:43:57.040 catching the
00:43:57.640 virus obviously,
00:43:58.600 not obviously.
00:43:59.820 What do you
00:44:00.400 mean obviously?
00:44:01.840 How in the world
00:44:02.440 could that be
00:44:02.880 obvious?
00:44:05.280 No idea,
00:44:06.400 unknowable.
00:44:07.320 Yeah, so
00:44:07.680 everybody says
00:44:08.360 it's unknowable,
00:44:09.600 that's the right
00:44:10.340 answer.
00:44:11.640 Now given
00:44:12.280 that that's
00:44:12.800 the number
00:44:13.360 one biggest
00:44:14.240 variable,
00:44:16.520 well let me
00:44:16.920 ask this
00:44:17.280 question.
00:44:18.080 Is the
00:44:18.760 side effect
00:44:19.460 risk,
00:44:20.900 or the
00:44:21.480 long-term
00:44:21.840 risk of
00:44:22.340 the virus
00:44:22.960 versus the
00:44:24.000 vaccine,
00:44:25.900 plus the
00:44:27.060 short-term
00:44:27.440 risk,
00:44:28.440 do you
00:44:32.360 feel you
00:44:33.000 understand those
00:44:33.720 risks?
00:44:34.080 anyway,
00:44:37.080 let me ask
00:44:37.680 this question.
00:44:38.460 Do you
00:44:38.640 think that
00:44:38.960 the risks
00:44:39.560 of the
00:44:40.680 vaccination
00:44:41.040 itself,
00:44:42.060 do you
00:44:42.360 think that
00:44:42.680 that's the
00:44:43.160 biggest
00:44:43.540 variable in
00:44:45.900 your decision?
00:44:46.920 Is the
00:44:47.320 risk of
00:44:48.080 the
00:44:48.240 vaccination
00:44:48.900 hurting you
00:44:50.180 itself,
00:44:51.040 is that the
00:44:51.620 biggest variable
00:44:52.540 in your
00:44:52.960 decision,
00:44:54.020 compared to
00:44:55.720 the risk of
00:44:56.160 the virus
00:44:56.600 itself?
00:45:00.980 No.
00:45:01.780 So if
00:45:02.120 it's not
00:45:02.480 your biggest
00:45:02.920 variable,
00:45:03.420 what is a
00:45:03.820 bigger variable
00:45:04.440 than that?
00:45:05.240 Somebody tell
00:45:06.060 me.
00:45:06.820 For those
00:45:07.280 of you who
00:45:07.660 say that
00:45:08.060 the risk
00:45:08.660 from the
00:45:10.720 vaccination is
00:45:11.420 not the
00:45:11.860 biggest variable,
00:45:12.680 what is the
00:45:13.700 biggest variable?
00:45:15.040 Your health,
00:45:15.760 but that's in
00:45:16.640 all the
00:45:16.920 decisions.
00:45:17.480 Your age,
00:45:19.020 no, I
00:45:19.700 mean we're
00:45:20.200 adjusting for
00:45:20.840 age and
00:45:21.300 stuff, so
00:45:21.660 assuming
00:45:22.520 everybody's
00:45:23.120 made the
00:45:23.580 decision about
00:45:25.240 their
00:45:25.420 comorbidities
00:45:26.300 and their
00:45:26.640 age and
00:45:27.000 all that,
00:45:28.000 but that's
00:45:28.460 baked into
00:45:30.680 it.
00:45:31.620 But once
00:45:32.080 you've done
00:45:32.420 that,
00:45:32.840 isn't
00:45:34.240 your biggest
00:45:34.780 variable the
00:45:35.900 risk?
00:45:38.140 Easy travel?
00:45:39.120 Oh, okay.
00:45:39.960 Some people
00:45:40.420 say they
00:45:40.860 just did it
00:45:41.680 for the
00:45:41.980 travel, but
00:45:42.800 that also
00:45:43.280 assumes that
00:45:44.060 it wasn't a
00:45:45.600 big risk for
00:45:46.900 the vaccination,
00:45:47.620 in your
00:45:47.980 mind.
00:45:51.460 Supporting a
00:45:52.160 safety-obsessed
00:45:53.200 world.
00:45:53.900 Okay.
00:45:55.020 That would be a
00:45:55.780 philosophical
00:45:56.340 objection.
00:45:58.040 Got it.
00:45:58.580 it's a
00:46:01.440 Chinese
00:46:01.740 bioweapon
00:46:02.460 being
00:46:02.740 injected
00:46:03.140 into you,
00:46:03.740 but the
00:46:07.700 virus is a
00:46:08.420 Chinese
00:46:08.660 bioweapon.
00:46:10.720 I don't
00:46:11.020 know what
00:46:11.280 the
00:46:11.420 vaccination
00:46:11.820 is.
00:46:13.660 All right.
00:46:14.420 Well, all of
00:46:15.040 you are much
00:46:15.680 more reasonable
00:46:16.300 than I was
00:46:17.060 expecting,
00:46:18.640 actually, so
00:46:19.220 good for
00:46:19.580 you.
00:46:19.800 And, let's
00:46:24.700 see what else
00:46:25.100 is going
00:46:25.380 on.
00:46:28.080 What would
00:46:28.920 happen when
00:46:31.080 100% of
00:46:32.300 people in
00:46:32.980 any place
00:46:33.680 get vaccinated?
00:46:36.580 What would
00:46:37.360 happen in a
00:46:38.160 place where
00:46:38.720 100% are
00:46:39.560 vaccinated?
00:46:40.600 What would
00:46:41.180 happen to
00:46:41.640 the VAERS
00:46:42.440 reporting?
00:46:45.100 What do you
00:46:45.860 think?
00:46:46.380 So the
00:46:46.820 VAERS
00:46:47.260 database has
00:46:48.020 the adverse
00:46:48.640 reactions that's
00:46:49.660 where people
00:46:50.400 report them.
00:46:51.420 Now, it's
00:46:51.740 not scientific,
00:46:52.600 it's just
00:46:53.000 anecdotal
00:46:53.640 reports.
00:46:54.760 But when
00:46:55.200 everybody is
00:46:56.120 vaccinated,
00:46:57.500 what would
00:46:57.980 the VAERS
00:46:58.480 database say?
00:47:00.480 Wouldn't it
00:47:00.940 say that
00:47:01.540 everything that
00:47:03.100 is unexplained
00:47:04.600 is caused
00:47:05.620 by the
00:47:05.960 vaccination?
00:47:07.200 So you
00:47:07.900 should expect
00:47:08.580 that no
00:47:09.560 matter how
00:47:09.960 many people
00:47:10.380 get vaccinated,
00:47:11.240 the number
00:47:11.660 of people
00:47:12.000 infected should
00:47:12.700 go up.
00:47:14.020 Does
00:47:14.220 everybody
00:47:14.480 get that?
00:47:16.620 That if
00:47:17.180 everything is
00:47:17.820 the way the
00:47:18.360 scientists
00:47:18.860 understand that
00:47:20.480 the vaccinations
00:47:21.240 reduce the
00:47:23.340 length of
00:47:23.740 time you
00:47:24.040 have it and
00:47:24.600 your hospitalizations
00:47:25.440 and your
00:47:26.120 death rates,
00:47:27.560 if everything
00:47:30.380 about that is
00:47:30.920 true, what
00:47:33.360 would you
00:47:33.700 expect?
00:47:35.820 You would
00:47:36.420 expect the
00:47:36.820 VAERS database
00:47:37.420 to go through
00:47:38.000 the roof,
00:47:38.500 right?
00:47:39.280 The more
00:47:39.940 people who
00:47:40.440 are vaccinated,
00:47:42.080 the more the
00:47:42.940 VAERS rate
00:47:44.360 will go up.
00:47:44.940 but you
00:47:45.700 understand that
00:47:46.300 that would
00:47:46.580 go up
00:47:46.900 whether or
00:47:47.540 not the
00:47:48.160 vaccinations
00:47:48.680 were causing
00:47:49.360 problems.
00:47:50.480 How many
00:47:50.820 of you
00:47:51.060 understand
00:47:51.440 that?
00:47:52.820 That no
00:47:53.400 matter what,
00:47:55.020 as more
00:47:55.780 people get
00:47:56.260 vaccinated,
00:47:57.560 the VAERS
00:47:58.040 database report
00:47:59.060 should go
00:47:59.620 through the
00:48:00.060 roof, even
00:48:01.360 if the
00:48:01.680 vaccinations
00:48:02.180 were perfectly
00:48:02.940 safe.
00:48:03.520 Does
00:48:03.680 everybody
00:48:03.900 get that?
00:48:05.620 Is there
00:48:06.240 anybody who
00:48:06.600 doesn't
00:48:06.900 understand that
00:48:07.840 the VAERS
00:48:08.280 database will
00:48:08.980 go through
00:48:09.380 the roof
00:48:09.900 no matter
00:48:11.700 what?
00:48:12.060 it doesn't
00:48:13.720 have an
00:48:14.000 option of
00:48:14.400 doing
00:48:14.580 anything
00:48:14.840 else.
00:48:17.520 Right.
00:48:17.860 It would
00:48:18.040 be correlation
00:48:18.640 not causation
00:48:19.520 but there
00:48:20.460 isn't any
00:48:21.020 way the
00:48:21.420 VAERS
00:48:21.620 database
00:48:22.080 can't go
00:48:22.620 way up
00:48:23.140 no matter
00:48:24.660 what the
00:48:25.060 vaccinations
00:48:25.560 are doing.
00:48:28.400 Right?
00:48:33.120 JFK
00:48:33.720 Jr.
00:48:34.160 shows up
00:48:34.560 when we
00:48:34.840 get to
00:48:35.080 100%.
00:48:37.200 VAERS
00:48:38.760 is not
00:48:39.580 as...
00:48:40.280 Doctors
00:48:40.920 want to
00:48:41.320 support
00:48:41.700 an
00:48:41.980 adverse
00:48:42.520 report
00:48:43.100 that has
00:48:43.460 passed
00:48:43.800 two weeks
00:48:44.400 of
00:48:44.600 VAX.
00:48:45.440 Okay.
00:48:46.720 Doesn't
00:48:47.180 change my
00:48:47.720 point.
00:48:49.600 Yeah.
00:48:49.880 It should
00:48:50.260 skyrocket
00:48:50.980 no matter
00:48:51.420 what because
00:48:51.920 we're all
00:48:52.220 talking about
00:48:52.780 it.
00:48:53.680 The fact
00:48:54.140 that it's
00:48:54.460 a national
00:48:55.000 conversation
00:48:55.640 should make
00:48:56.280 the reports
00:48:57.260 go through
00:48:57.660 the roof.
00:48:58.340 And the
00:48:58.840 fact that
00:48:59.240 so many
00:48:59.680 people are
00:49:00.100 now vaccinated
00:49:00.840 that should
00:49:02.120 also make
00:49:02.620 it go
00:49:02.860 through the
00:49:03.220 roof even
00:49:03.820 if the
00:49:04.980 vaccinations
00:49:05.460 don't hurt
00:49:06.040 anybody.
00:49:08.960 Right.
00:49:09.460 So most
00:49:10.380 of the people
00:49:10.720 I see
00:49:11.060 arguing on
00:49:11.560 the internet
00:49:11.900 don't seem
00:49:12.420 to understand
00:49:12.960 that the
00:49:13.340 VAERS
00:49:13.600 database
00:49:13.980 has to
00:49:14.520 go up.
00:49:15.360 If everything
00:49:16.160 we know
00:49:16.560 about human
00:49:17.180 beings and
00:49:17.900 math is
00:49:19.060 true, it
00:49:20.120 has to go
00:49:20.520 up.
00:49:20.680 It has to
00:49:20.980 go up a
00:49:21.240 lot and
00:49:21.660 it has to
00:49:21.960 go up
00:49:22.160 fast.
00:49:24.000 It doesn't
00:49:24.660 mean anything.
00:49:25.880 It could
00:49:26.280 mean something
00:49:26.860 but it
00:49:27.580 doesn't
00:49:27.800 necessarily
00:49:28.460 mean
00:49:28.800 something.
00:49:30.400 All
00:49:30.500 right.
00:49:33.340 And that
00:49:34.220 is just
00:49:35.900 about what I
00:49:36.400 wanted to
00:49:36.740 tell you
00:49:37.040 today.
00:49:37.380 Scott, we
00:49:41.040 aren't
00:49:41.260 idiots.
00:49:42.480 You know, I
00:49:42.860 think the
00:49:43.140 people watching
00:49:43.700 this live
00:49:44.240 stream are
00:49:44.880 more informed
00:49:46.300 and better
00:49:47.040 thinkers than
00:49:47.780 the people who
00:49:48.500 are just
00:49:49.200 random Twitter
00:49:50.040 users in the
00:49:50.740 public.
00:49:51.440 How many of
00:49:52.000 you would
00:49:52.260 agree with
00:49:52.680 that statement?
00:49:53.840 Because most
00:49:54.560 of what we
00:49:55.020 talk about is
00:49:55.900 how to think
00:49:56.440 about stuff
00:49:56.960 better.
00:49:58.100 If you spend
00:49:59.620 enough time
00:50:00.340 learning to
00:50:01.040 think, you're
00:50:01.880 going to be
00:50:02.300 better at it.
00:50:03.660 Yeah.
00:50:03.960 And locals,
00:50:04.720 it's almost
00:50:05.560 all yeses.
00:50:08.640 And here on
00:50:09.460 YouTube, there
00:50:10.280 are more
00:50:10.560 people just
00:50:11.160 wandering in
00:50:11.860 for the first
00:50:12.340 time, so it's
00:50:12.920 going to be a
00:50:13.240 little different.
00:50:15.460 Yeah.
00:50:16.020 You know, when I
00:50:17.020 was talking about
00:50:18.100 the VAERS
00:50:18.440 database, I was
00:50:19.260 kind of expecting
00:50:20.020 a pushback, but
00:50:22.060 I didn't get it.
00:50:23.580 Because I think
00:50:24.400 you're all smarter
00:50:25.060 than the average
00:50:25.800 at this point.
00:50:28.620 You are
00:50:29.260 geniuses, and
00:50:30.420 if I may say
00:50:31.380 so, in
00:50:32.920 inexplicably
00:50:33.680 sexy.
00:50:35.500 And that's
00:50:36.440 not just for
00:50:37.200 the people
00:50:38.740 who like
00:50:39.060 smart people.
00:50:43.700 Better
00:50:44.180 looking, and
00:50:45.340 sexier.
00:50:45.940 Yeah, it's
00:50:46.460 true.
00:50:50.360 Yum.
00:50:52.840 I don't
00:50:53.460 ever learn how
00:50:54.080 to think from
00:50:54.620 a cartoonist,
00:50:55.540 lol.
00:50:57.340 Well,
00:50:58.900 apparently you're
00:50:59.660 right.
00:51:00.960 One of the
00:51:01.560 comments on
00:51:02.060 YouTube was,
00:51:02.920 that he
00:51:03.700 doesn't learn
00:51:04.240 how to think
00:51:05.160 from a
00:51:05.540 cartoonist.
00:51:06.520 To which I
00:51:07.340 say, I'll
00:51:08.280 bet that's
00:51:08.720 true.
00:51:09.800 I'll bet you
00:51:10.320 have not
00:51:10.620 learned how
00:51:11.000 to think.
00:51:12.300 So, I'm
00:51:14.280 going to say
00:51:14.880 goodbye to
00:51:15.420 YouTube.
00:51:16.200 I'm going to
00:51:16.500 spend a minute
00:51:17.380 here with my
00:51:18.840 locals people,
00:51:19.820 and I will
00:51:20.880 talk to you
00:51:21.580 tomorrow.
00:51:22.660 tomorrow.
00:51:31.580 you
00:51:31.720 more
00:51:32.400 than
00:51:32.680 you
00:51:34.000 know,