Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1592 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Mass Brainwashing Operations Going on Right Now

00:00:00.600 Wow, it's going to be a great day today.

00:00:04.320 And do you know why?

00:00:05.500 Well, for starters, you found your way to Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:09.880 and that identifies you as, well, smarter than average,

00:00:15.000 probably sexier, I think you'll live longer,

00:00:17.820 and I've got a strong intuition that your antibodies are way above average.

00:00:22.880 That's how awesome you are.

00:00:24.820 But do you think this will be a good day for the live stream?

00:00:28.460 Yes, it's going to be the best day ever in the history of the universe,

00:00:32.120 and all you need to get going is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:34.640 a tank or a chelice or a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:42.940 I like coffee.

00:00:44.580 Yeah, it's a different mug. We'll talk about that.

00:00:47.480 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:51.000 It's the dopamine of the day.

00:00:53.240 It's the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:55.260 It's called the Simultaneous Sip and Happens Now Go.

00:00:58.460 Ah, yeah, that's so good.

00:01:04.700 Well, I have the non-standard mug.

00:01:06.480 I know you're interested in all things coffee.

00:01:09.600 Because my kitchen was being worked on yesterday,

00:01:12.240 and I cleverly took everything that I would need out of the kitchen

00:01:16.500 and put it in a different room

00:01:18.560 so that while the kitchen was being worked on

00:01:21.000 and I didn't have access to it

00:01:22.280 because the floor was being worked on,

00:01:25.480 that I would have everything I needed.

00:01:28.240 And the one thing I forgot,

00:01:30.420 I even moved the coffee maker, all the coffee.

00:01:34.140 I forgot a mug.

00:01:36.540 So here I was, all prepared yesterday,

00:01:38.580 and I didn't have a mug to put my coffee in.

00:01:42.120 How unhappy was I?

00:01:43.840 Well, I drove immediately to the local Starbucks

00:01:47.160 and bought myself a couple of mugs.

00:01:49.800 Anyway, how many of you have seen my pinned tweet

00:01:55.220 in which I asked for people to show me all their best memes for 2021?

00:02:00.280 Has anybody spent any time looking at that?

00:02:04.260 Let me just say,

00:02:06.400 oh, my God.

00:02:10.200 Think about the funniest thing you've seen all year.

00:02:13.180 It might have been Dave Chappelle.

00:02:15.500 Very funny.

00:02:17.280 Maybe there was some event or some friend of yours.

00:02:20.580 The funniest thing that happened to you all year.

00:02:23.040 Just think about what that is.

00:02:25.620 Okay, got that in your mind?

00:02:26.860 The funniest thing,

00:02:27.860 the thing you laughed at the most all year.

00:02:30.280 Now multiply that by about five

00:02:32.820 and go look at the comments

00:02:34.960 to my pinned tweet asking for memes.

00:02:39.320 You will, I actually, this is not a joke.

00:02:43.220 I'm going to say something that sounds like obvious hyperbole.

00:02:46.460 Literally, meaning the actual word literally.

00:02:50.420 No joke.

00:02:51.720 I had to stop reading them for health reasons.

00:02:55.860 No joke.

00:02:56.440 I swear to God, that is a literal truth.

00:03:00.820 I had to take time off and go back in

00:03:04.120 because I laughed so hard.

00:03:07.820 Not a joke.

00:03:09.420 I thought I was going to hurt something.

00:03:11.980 It was actually dangerous.

00:03:14.340 I don't even remember the last time I laughed that hard.

00:03:16.960 Now here's the thing that is a little humor writing tip.

00:03:22.660 You ready?

00:03:25.000 Humor, if you look at these memes

00:03:27.140 and you look at any one individually,

00:03:29.520 you might love it, you might laugh.

00:03:31.600 But when you see them all as a collective,

00:03:35.220 you know, you read a bunch of them on different topics,

00:03:37.840 it has a whole different effect.

00:03:39.860 And the effect is it just brings you into this absurdity world

00:03:45.120 where everything's absurd for a while

00:03:47.760 and you can just go live there for a while.

00:03:49.940 If you just see one meme, you're like boop, boop,

00:03:52.680 you're in and out.

00:03:53.620 It's like you weren't ever there.

00:03:55.360 But if you read them all at once

00:03:57.700 and you just sort of live in them for a while,

00:04:00.820 you will cry.

00:04:02.100 I mean, you will cry laughing

00:04:05.740 until I was feeling like

00:04:08.840 something was going to give out in my actual guts.

00:04:15.220 I can't recommend it enough.

00:04:18.400 Do yourself a favor.

00:04:20.260 Just spend 10 minutes.

00:04:22.540 That's all I'm asking.

00:04:23.960 If you don't cry,

00:04:26.140 I will be very surprised.

00:04:28.240 Cry laughing, that is.

00:04:29.240 Speaking of things to laugh at,

00:04:35.500 I was reading an article,

00:04:36.800 I think it was in BuzzFeed,

00:04:38.320 in which women were saying

00:04:39.500 what they also saw in Pete Davidson.

00:04:42.560 You know, Pete Davidson has been dating

00:04:44.820 a bunch of A-list celebrity women

00:04:46.960 that you would say to yourself,

00:04:50.200 or at least men tend to say this,

00:04:52.420 how does he get all these women?

00:04:55.560 Right?

00:04:56.240 And so women were asked what they saw in him.

00:05:00.240 I love some of the answers.

00:05:04.660 For example,

00:05:06.580 he's such a mess,

00:05:07.960 I mean, I'm paraphrasing the answers,

00:05:09.500 so this is my words,

00:05:11.100 but this idea,

00:05:12.960 that he's such a mess

00:05:13.860 that you're pretty sure he won't judge you.

00:05:17.060 What do you think of that?

00:05:19.040 He's such a basket case,

00:05:20.760 which, you know,

00:05:21.780 he's very overt about,

00:05:23.420 very transparent.

00:05:24.840 He'll tell you what a basket case he is

00:05:26.620 and has been,

00:05:27.940 and that it makes you comfortable around him.

00:05:31.040 True?

00:05:32.240 I think so.

00:05:33.700 I think you're more comfortable around people

00:05:35.640 who clearly have more problems than you do.

00:05:39.160 That's one thing.

00:05:40.420 Now, he's also tall,

00:05:41.600 he's successful,

00:05:42.420 he's funny,

00:05:43.520 you know,

00:05:43.820 he's getting rich,

00:05:45.760 which didn't matter to the specific women he was with,

00:05:48.380 but, you know,

00:05:50.140 you can see all those things as well.

00:05:51.900 But here's the funniest part.

00:05:54.820 Somebody,

00:05:55.460 it was a tweet

00:05:56.840 that was part of the article,

00:05:58.580 somebody described Pete Davidson

00:06:00.300 as looking like a wet cigarette.

00:06:11.020 That's good.

00:06:12.800 I mean, that's really good.

00:06:13.760 I've seen people describe me

00:06:17.480 as looking like a thumb,

00:06:19.340 and, you know,

00:06:19.900 I laugh at that too.

00:06:21.480 So, you know,

00:06:22.300 I don't want to make fun of people's looks.

00:06:24.040 I don't generally do that.

00:06:25.260 But when somebody makes a,

00:06:26.980 like a spot-on

00:06:28.540 kind of analogy,

00:06:31.740 a wet cigarette,

00:06:33.080 I don't think that could be any better,

00:06:34.740 could it?

00:06:35.800 I mean,

00:06:36.080 just in terms of cruel descriptions of people.

00:06:38.940 I've been on the receiving end

00:06:40.140 of lots of cruel descriptions,

00:06:41.560 and I can tell you

00:06:42.940 that when they're done well,

00:06:44.200 they're actually just hilarious,

00:06:45.980 even if it's about you.

00:06:48.300 So,

00:06:48.900 I'd like to think

00:06:49.820 that he would laugh at that too,

00:06:51.180 because it's just so clever.

00:06:54.740 So,

00:06:55.260 I think that women know

00:06:56.380 that he's not going to think

00:06:57.820 he's better than them.

00:07:00.840 But,

00:07:02.540 and somebody else said

00:07:03.340 he's a nice guy,

00:07:04.600 but he's sort of confident

00:07:06.360 in who he is.

00:07:09.080 I think,

00:07:09.500 have you ever heard the phrase,

00:07:10.580 people are comfortable

00:07:12.460 in their own skin?

00:07:14.500 In other words,

00:07:14.960 it doesn't matter who you are,

00:07:16.100 but are you comfortable

00:07:17.060 being that person?

00:07:18.220 And if you are,

00:07:18.880 other people are comfortable

00:07:19.800 around you.

00:07:21.020 Now,

00:07:21.440 I'm not sure

00:07:22.240 that describes

00:07:23.240 Pete Davidson,

00:07:24.920 because that would require

00:07:25.920 reading his mind,

00:07:27.200 and we can't do that.

00:07:28.400 But I would say

00:07:29.000 it looks like that,

00:07:30.420 you know,

00:07:30.660 from the outside.

00:07:31.960 It looks like

00:07:32.680 he's someone

00:07:33.800 who's completely

00:07:34.800 confident

00:07:35.880 that he is

00:07:37.960 just him,

00:07:38.400 and he's not

00:07:39.400 anybody else

00:07:40.040 that he's not

00:07:40.420 trying to be.

00:07:41.600 So,

00:07:42.060 the fact that he's

00:07:42.880 putting no effort

00:07:43.660 into trying to look

00:07:44.580 like somebody else,

00:07:46.620 I think that gives him

00:07:47.540 a little credit,

00:07:48.140 doesn't it?

00:07:49.360 I think he's likable.

00:07:51.820 I mean,

00:07:52.140 you know,

00:07:52.900 I like everybody

00:07:53.780 with a sense of humor.

00:07:56.460 So,

00:07:57.040 I know I would like him

00:07:58.200 if he were in the same room.

00:08:00.300 So,

00:08:00.580 you got that.

00:08:01.480 But here's the other thing

00:08:02.360 that I think people

00:08:03.060 are missing

00:08:03.480 in the story.

00:08:05.260 The story is about

00:08:06.100 how all these

00:08:07.180 top,

00:08:09.520 let's say,

00:08:10.360 top celebrity

00:08:11.020 and attractive women

00:08:12.860 all like him.

00:08:14.240 Is that the real story?

00:08:16.580 Because there's a part

00:08:17.420 of the story

00:08:17.860 they're leaving out.

00:08:20.500 None of them

00:08:21.160 wanted to marry him.

00:08:23.920 Am I right?

00:08:26.180 Why isn't that the story?

00:08:28.600 The story should be

00:08:29.580 zero people

00:08:30.700 wanted to marry

00:08:31.460 Pete Davidson.

00:08:33.180 Now,

00:08:33.640 I don't know

00:08:33.900 if he wanted

00:08:34.320 to get married.

00:08:35.000 Maybe not.

00:08:36.100 But,

00:08:37.060 I'm not sure

00:08:38.220 that women

00:08:38.620 see him

00:08:39.080 as a keeper.

00:08:40.880 I think they might

00:08:41.740 see him as

00:08:42.320 just a great guy

00:08:43.280 to hang around with.

00:08:44.440 Because he looks

00:08:45.020 like he'd be fun.

00:08:45.960 I mean,

00:08:46.180 how would it not be fun?

00:08:48.080 It would be hard

00:08:48.900 to even,

00:08:50.060 like,

00:08:50.280 could you even

00:08:50.760 picture in your mind

00:08:52.080 hanging out

00:08:53.740 with Pete Davidson

00:08:54.480 and not having fun?

00:08:56.980 Like,

00:08:57.340 you really can't

00:08:57.840 even conceive of it,

00:08:58.700 can you?

00:08:59.840 So,

00:09:00.420 I totally see

00:09:01.620 his appeal.

00:09:03.440 I don't think

00:09:04.500 people are going

00:09:06.020 to line up

00:09:06.820 to marry him

00:09:07.400 right away

00:09:07.840 for a lot

00:09:09.460 of the same reasons.

00:09:11.120 Rasmussen

00:09:11.540 has a poll

00:09:12.160 that Biden's

00:09:13.200 approval is

00:09:13.880 at 41%,

00:09:15.500 his disapproval

00:09:17.280 at 57%.

00:09:19.060 But here's the

00:09:20.400 weird thing.

00:09:21.560 57% disapprove

00:09:23.240 of him,

00:09:24.080 but yet 64%

00:09:25.320 say things

00:09:26.360 are heading

00:09:26.680 in the wrong

00:09:27.140 direction.

00:09:29.520 I don't know.

00:09:30.440 Maybe because

00:09:31.180 it's not his fault?

00:09:32.500 I would think

00:09:33.200 that his disapproval

00:09:34.160 would be closer

00:09:34.840 to the same

00:09:36.240 as the number

00:09:36.820 that say it's

00:09:37.400 heading in the

00:09:37.880 wrong direction.

00:09:38.780 It's in that

00:09:39.240 neighborhood,

00:09:39.880 but I'd expect

00:09:40.600 that to be closer.

00:09:42.640 Anyway,

00:09:43.040 where are all

00:09:46.100 the people

00:09:46.480 who thought

00:09:47.000 things would be

00:09:47.720 better under Trump?

00:09:50.060 Because I don't

00:09:50.800 think we got

00:09:51.320 that, right?

00:09:51.940 Or better under

00:09:52.560 Biden than Trump.

00:09:53.480 I don't think

00:09:53.840 we got that.

00:09:55.140 I wonder if

00:09:55.580 people are noticing.

00:09:57.600 So,

00:09:58.540 Brian Stilter

00:10:01.480 was pointing out

00:10:02.300 that the

00:10:03.280 January 6th

00:10:04.260 committee hearings

00:10:05.080 were apparently

00:10:06.620 being broadcast

00:10:07.240 by CNN,

00:10:08.420 but he points

00:10:09.260 out that it

00:10:10.180 wasn't being

00:10:10.820 carried by

00:10:11.400 Fox News,

00:10:13.360 Newsmax,

00:10:14.160 or One

00:10:14.560 America News,

00:10:15.720 all right-leaning

00:10:16.940 news outlets.

00:10:19.860 So,

00:10:20.160 what do you

00:10:20.360 think?

00:10:20.660 Does Stilter

00:10:21.720 have a point?

00:10:23.000 Because you've

00:10:23.420 seen it in the

00:10:23.860 other direction,

00:10:24.560 right?

00:10:25.780 You've seen the

00:10:26.520 other direction

00:10:27.100 where Fox News

00:10:28.860 would carry

00:10:29.260 something all day

00:10:29.940 long that

00:10:31.440 the CNN

00:10:32.800 would not.

00:10:33.800 You could

00:10:34.060 probably think

00:10:34.500 of some

00:10:34.940 examples of

00:10:36.000 that.

00:10:36.980 So,

00:10:37.360 does he have

00:10:37.720 a point?

00:10:38.060 Do you feel

00:10:40.120 like you're

00:10:40.520 being manipulated

00:10:41.360 by the right-leaning

00:10:43.600 media for not

00:10:45.080 showing you that?

00:10:45.820 Why don't

00:10:48.600 you care?

00:10:50.760 Why don't

00:10:51.300 you care?

00:10:53.840 Now,

00:10:54.300 I can see why

00:10:54.840 CNN wouldn't

00:10:55.500 cover the

00:10:55.880 Trump rallies

00:10:56.560 because those

00:10:57.060 are purely

00:10:57.520 political.

00:10:57.960 you don't

00:11:02.200 care.

00:11:03.260 Okay?

00:11:03.680 Here's my

00:11:04.340 speculation about

00:11:05.440 why the people

00:11:06.120 on the right

00:11:06.800 and therefore

00:11:07.620 the platforms

00:11:08.400 themselves don't

00:11:10.160 carry it.

00:11:10.660 see if this

00:11:11.580 rings true

00:11:12.160 with you

00:11:12.540 because everyone

00:11:14.920 on the right

00:11:15.620 knows it

00:11:16.820 wasn't an

00:11:17.360 insurrection.

00:11:19.160 So,

00:11:19.760 it's a

00:11:20.240 committee to

00:11:21.460 find out if

00:11:22.580 an insurrection

00:11:23.380 happened and

00:11:24.260 how it happened

00:11:24.900 and who was

00:11:25.340 behind it.

00:11:26.680 Everyone on

00:11:27.440 the right

00:11:27.800 knows it's

00:11:28.340 not real.

00:11:31.200 Everyone.

00:11:33.040 Everyone.

00:11:34.380 I think

00:11:34.740 everyone on

00:11:35.280 the right

00:11:35.540 knows there

00:11:35.960 was no

00:11:36.280 insurrection

00:11:36.720 and that no

00:11:37.660 one will be

00:11:38.160 charged with

00:11:38.700 one.

00:11:38.940 Now,

00:11:40.820 I realize

00:11:41.160 that insurrection

00:11:41.680 is difficult

00:11:42.580 to charge,

00:11:44.800 but there's

00:11:46.240 nobody even

00:11:46.700 close.

00:11:48.460 Is there?

00:11:49.440 They're being

00:11:49.980 charged with

00:11:50.600 individual crimes

00:11:51.580 which I think

00:11:52.640 in most cases

00:11:53.320 they did

00:11:53.800 commit.

00:11:55.000 So,

00:11:55.320 I don't,

00:11:55.720 and here's

00:11:56.300 the thing,

00:11:57.060 are any

00:11:58.440 conservatives

00:11:59.780 complaining

00:12:00.620 that the

00:12:02.280 protesters

00:12:02.840 who literally

00:12:03.680 broke a

00:12:04.320 law are

00:12:05.940 subject to

00:12:06.880 the legal

00:12:08.380 system?

00:12:08.940 I haven't

00:12:10.120 heard anybody

00:12:10.520 complain about

00:12:11.100 that.

00:12:11.700 We've

00:12:11.920 complained about

00:12:12.460 people being

00:12:13.060 jailed for

00:12:13.960 too long

00:12:14.580 without the

00:12:15.540 system,

00:12:16.600 you know,

00:12:17.000 dealing with

00:12:17.640 them one way

00:12:18.080 or another.

00:12:18.820 And that

00:12:19.120 looks criminal

00:12:19.880 to me.

00:12:21.100 But nobody's

00:12:21.760 complaining about

00:12:22.360 the fact that

00:12:23.000 there's a thing

00:12:23.640 called laws

00:12:24.360 that apply to

00:12:25.700 everybody.

00:12:28.460 All right,

00:12:28.980 that's my theory,

00:12:29.840 is that the

00:12:30.320 people on the

00:12:30.780 left need to

00:12:31.640 see it because

00:12:32.760 they could find

00:12:33.680 out what's going

00:12:34.360 on, but the

00:12:34.960 people on the

00:12:35.380 right already

00:12:36.220 know.

00:12:37.120 There's nothing

00:12:37.680 to find out.

00:12:38.920 Why would

00:12:39.340 you show an

00:12:39.940 entire hearing

00:12:41.600 of nothing?

00:12:43.280 That's what it

00:12:43.920 looks like on

00:12:44.340 the right.

00:12:45.180 Now, I'm

00:12:46.140 being too

00:12:46.560 kind because

00:12:47.480 obviously all

00:12:48.480 the news

00:12:48.840 organizations are

00:12:49.840 in some way

00:12:51.400 brainwashing

00:12:52.340 tools.

00:12:54.140 So if they

00:12:55.020 choose to not

00:12:56.020 show something

00:12:56.600 or show

00:12:57.020 something, that

00:12:58.460 is a statement

00:12:59.400 about brainwashing.

00:13:01.000 But in this

00:13:01.820 case, CNN is

00:13:02.620 doing the

00:13:03.020 brainwashing and

00:13:04.100 the other

00:13:05.320 entities already

00:13:06.900 said everything

00:13:07.420 they need to

00:13:07.940 say.

00:13:08.780 There's nothing

00:13:09.240 there except

00:13:10.500 individual crimes

00:13:11.500 which need to

00:13:12.100 be dealt

00:13:13.000 with.

00:13:14.540 All right,

00:13:14.860 here are some

00:13:15.220 examples of

00:13:15.940 recent mass

00:13:16.660 brainwashing

00:13:17.380 operations.

00:13:18.160 And by the

00:13:18.460 way, I think

00:13:19.640 we need to

00:13:20.120 get away from

00:13:21.040 our old words

00:13:23.300 about the

00:13:24.160 so-called news

00:13:25.000 networks and

00:13:26.320 social media

00:13:26.960 collectively.

00:13:27.800 They're not

00:13:28.460 really about

00:13:29.180 news anymore,

00:13:29.840 are they?

00:13:30.940 It would be,

00:13:32.100 I think it

00:13:32.520 would be more

00:13:32.980 accurate and

00:13:33.800 without

00:13:34.300 hyperbole.

00:13:36.180 I'm going to

00:13:36.880 try to be

00:13:37.460 just straightforward

00:13:39.260 on the facts

00:13:40.200 and not

00:13:40.800 exaggerate them.

00:13:41.680 It'll sound

00:13:42.140 like an

00:13:42.500 exaggeration,

00:13:43.880 but I'm not

00:13:44.340 trying to do

00:13:44.940 that.

00:13:45.180 I'm honestly

00:13:45.780 trying to not

00:13:46.480 exaggerate.

00:13:48.200 I think the

00:13:49.260 things we used

00:13:49.880 to call the

00:13:50.300 news are so

00:13:51.040 clearly now

00:13:51.980 just brainwashing

00:13:53.860 operations that

00:13:55.860 I have trouble

00:13:56.860 even considering

00:13:57.640 them as news

00:13:58.540 entities.

00:14:00.180 They just

00:14:00.600 look like a

00:14:02.200 brainwashing

00:14:02.780 operation going

00:14:03.800 in different

00:14:04.180 directions.

00:14:05.680 That's all it

00:14:06.140 looks like to

00:14:06.600 me.

00:14:07.560 Now there is

00:14:08.200 news there

00:14:08.860 which gives

00:14:09.340 them a reason

00:14:10.740 or a cover

00:14:11.280 story for

00:14:11.800 existing,

00:14:12.400 I guess.

00:14:13.240 But listen

00:14:13.840 to all these.

00:14:15.000 In my opinion,

00:14:16.240 these are

00:14:16.620 brainwashing

00:14:17.300 operations,

00:14:18.820 meaning that

00:14:19.400 somebody

00:14:19.860 intentionally

00:14:20.560 said,

00:14:21.680 let's convince

00:14:22.220 somebody of

00:14:22.940 something that's

00:14:23.640 not true,

00:14:24.920 as opposed to

00:14:26.120 just fake news

00:14:26.900 where it's just

00:14:27.680 not true.

00:14:28.500 But somebody

00:14:28.960 actually decided

00:14:30.100 specifically,

00:14:32.440 let's see if

00:14:32.920 we can sell

00:14:33.420 this not

00:14:34.020 true thing.

00:14:35.440 You had the

00:14:35.820 Russia collusion

00:14:36.580 hoax.

00:14:37.820 They knew

00:14:38.280 that wasn't

00:14:38.740 true.

00:14:40.020 Here's a new

00:14:40.740 one I'm adding

00:14:41.180 to my list.

00:14:42.280 Have you seen

00:14:42.740 the chart that

00:14:44.380 shows you that

00:14:45.100 at exactly the

00:14:45.980 same time,

00:14:46.620 Occupy Wall

00:14:47.400 Street disappeared

00:14:48.840 for no reason?

00:14:51.200 Because what

00:14:51.620 they were

00:14:51.880 complaining about

00:14:52.580 didn't stop.

00:14:53.480 It got worse.

00:14:54.840 The income

00:14:55.380 distribution got

00:14:56.220 worse, not

00:14:56.700 better.

00:14:56.920 But Occupy

00:14:58.020 Wall Street

00:14:58.360 just sort of

00:14:58.860 went away.

00:15:00.560 And then it

00:15:00.920 was replaced

00:15:01.480 with critical

00:15:02.180 race theory

00:15:02.800 and Black

00:15:03.280 Lives Matter

00:15:03.840 and race,

00:15:04.800 race, race,

00:15:05.280 everything's

00:15:05.680 race.

00:15:06.980 Okay?

00:15:08.340 That's not

00:15:09.000 natural.

00:15:10.460 That's a

00:15:11.060 brainwashing

00:15:11.620 operation.

00:15:13.000 Obviously,

00:15:13.640 somebody decided

00:15:14.700 Occupy Wall

00:15:15.520 Street didn't

00:15:16.060 work as a

00:15:17.080 frame, and so

00:15:18.380 they came up

00:15:18.900 with a new

00:15:19.260 frame.

00:15:19.540 I don't know

00:15:19.840 who they is.

00:15:21.180 You could guess

00:15:21.940 it's Soros.

00:15:22.800 I know you're

00:15:23.280 going to say

00:15:23.560 Soros.

00:15:23.940 I don't have

00:15:25.060 personal reason

00:15:26.540 to believe

00:15:26.960 he's the

00:15:27.340 one cause

00:15:28.500 of all

00:15:28.800 this stuff.

00:15:30.220 But clearly

00:15:31.640 there were

00:15:32.140 numbers of

00:15:32.760 people in

00:15:33.460 important places

00:15:34.480 that thought

00:15:35.060 that race

00:15:35.680 was going to

00:15:36.220 be the new

00:15:36.660 frame.

00:15:37.980 And so I

00:15:38.700 would call

00:15:38.980 that a

00:15:39.260 brainwashing

00:15:39.820 operation

00:15:40.240 because not

00:15:40.960 much changed.

00:15:43.060 Right?

00:15:43.540 From, you

00:15:44.620 know, from

00:15:45.060 two years

00:15:45.700 ago, I

00:15:47.040 don't know

00:15:47.300 that much

00:15:47.600 changed, but

00:15:48.380 suddenly it's

00:15:48.800 the biggest

00:15:49.140 topic in the

00:15:49.740 world.

00:15:50.260 So that

00:15:50.620 screams

00:15:51.140 brainwashing

00:15:52.200 operation.

00:15:53.960 You saw

00:15:54.560 the Waukesha

00:15:56.320 story disappear.

00:15:59.700 That's a

00:16:00.080 brainwashing

00:16:00.660 operation.

00:16:01.660 They just

00:16:01.960 make an

00:16:02.820 inconvenient

00:16:03.540 narrative

00:16:04.700 disappear.

00:16:06.420 Of course,

00:16:07.060 the fine

00:16:07.380 people hoax,

00:16:08.320 the drinking

00:16:08.740 bleach hoax,

00:16:09.580 were two

00:16:10.060 big brainwashing

00:16:11.100 operations.

00:16:12.320 They worked

00:16:12.800 on the left

00:16:13.360 and worked

00:16:13.940 a little bit

00:16:14.400 on the right,

00:16:15.000 amazingly.

00:16:16.340 And then the

00:16:17.120 thought that

00:16:18.200 the courts

00:16:19.200 have validated

00:16:19.960 the election.

00:16:21.860 That's a

00:16:22.500 brainwashing

00:16:23.040 operation.

00:16:23.480 I think

00:16:24.240 half of the

00:16:24.680 country thinks

00:16:25.280 that the

00:16:25.660 courts looked

00:16:26.280 at the

00:16:26.540 election and

00:16:27.100 decided it

00:16:27.660 was fair.

00:16:29.260 You know

00:16:29.640 nothing like

00:16:30.100 that happened,

00:16:30.660 right?

00:16:31.660 There were

00:16:32.180 just a few

00:16:32.960 cases brought

00:16:33.660 to the

00:16:33.980 courts, and

00:16:35.060 in the most

00:16:35.780 cases, most

00:16:36.780 of them they

00:16:37.940 didn't have

00:16:38.300 standing, or it

00:16:39.080 was too late,

00:16:40.000 or there was a

00:16:41.360 reason that the

00:16:42.000 court couldn't

00:16:42.460 look at it, or

00:16:43.580 it was too early

00:16:44.260 before anybody

00:16:45.020 had audited

00:16:45.420 anything.

00:16:46.180 But basically

00:16:46.860 the courts

00:16:47.380 looked at a

00:16:48.620 whole bunch

00:16:49.020 of nothing.

00:16:50.280 There was a

00:16:50.700 lot of it,

00:16:51.260 but all of

00:16:52.860 it added up

00:16:53.320 to nothing.

00:16:54.280 So they

00:16:54.800 can't prove

00:16:55.660 there was no

00:16:56.340 election problems,

00:16:57.840 they can only

00:16:58.300 prove they

00:16:58.720 didn't judge

00:16:59.880 that there

00:17:00.140 was any,

00:17:01.160 which is

00:17:01.560 different.

00:17:03.020 All right, so

00:17:03.340 those are just

00:17:03.720 some examples.

00:17:04.820 Yeah, I just

00:17:06.320 don't even see

00:17:06.900 the news

00:17:07.340 anymore as

00:17:07.980 even intending

00:17:09.420 to give you

00:17:09.940 news.

00:17:10.600 It looks like

00:17:11.580 the intention

00:17:12.820 is to

00:17:13.860 brainwash.

00:17:16.620 All right.

00:17:17.260 I was

00:17:19.880 talking to

00:17:21.820 a gentleman

00:17:22.460 online who

00:17:23.180 had been

00:17:23.460 brainwashed to

00:17:24.180 believe there

00:17:24.540 was an

00:17:24.940 insurrection,

00:17:25.840 and when I

00:17:26.280 said it was

00:17:27.760 a weird

00:17:28.060 insurrection

00:17:28.520 because the

00:17:29.760 most armed

00:17:30.540 segment of

00:17:31.420 American life

00:17:32.220 didn't bring

00:17:33.320 weapons, and

00:17:35.280 I was corrected

00:17:35.960 that there

00:17:36.740 were actually

00:17:37.300 six guns

00:17:38.900 were retrieved

00:17:40.280 from the

00:17:41.120 protesters.

00:17:41.700 We assume

00:17:42.100 there were

00:17:42.360 more, but

00:17:43.360 six were

00:17:44.100 discovered.

00:17:45.440 Do you know

00:17:45.900 how they

00:17:46.180 discovered them?

00:17:48.120 Well, it

00:17:48.720 wasn't because

00:17:49.220 anybody had

00:17:50.000 one out.

00:17:52.460 I think, you

00:17:54.040 know, they

00:17:54.220 were probably

00:17:54.580 arrested for

00:17:55.140 other reasons

00:17:55.780 or whatever

00:17:56.540 and have

00:17:56.880 guns, but

00:17:58.100 this was

00:17:59.260 given to me

00:17:59.900 as a reason

00:18:00.500 to believe it

00:18:01.800 was an

00:18:02.240 armed

00:18:02.620 insurrection,

00:18:03.540 that they

00:18:03.880 had found

00:18:04.200 six guns.

00:18:05.540 And I

00:18:05.840 pointed out

00:18:06.400 that six

00:18:07.220 guns is

00:18:08.000 roughly the

00:18:09.240 amount of

00:18:09.620 guns in a

00:18:10.340 Texas Walmart

00:18:11.220 on any

00:18:12.420 given moment.

00:18:14.360 Am I

00:18:15.100 wrong?

00:18:15.360 If you

00:18:16.480 go into a

00:18:17.100 Walmart in

00:18:17.720 Texas, do

00:18:19.400 you think

00:18:19.660 there are

00:18:19.920 six guns

00:18:20.440 in there?

00:18:22.040 I'll bet.

00:18:24.140 And then

00:18:24.740 how many are

00:18:25.160 in the

00:18:25.380 parking lot?

00:18:27.080 Six guns

00:18:27.820 in the

00:18:28.060 building, but

00:18:28.500 how many are

00:18:28.920 in the

00:18:29.240 parking lot?

00:18:31.060 Oh, a

00:18:31.820 hundred.

00:18:33.580 That's probably

00:18:34.260 every Walmart.

00:18:35.840 So, no, that

00:18:36.640 doesn't mean

00:18:37.020 anything that

00:18:37.500 there were

00:18:37.740 six guns in

00:18:38.760 a gigantic

00:18:39.980 gathering of

00:18:40.980 conservatives.

00:18:41.540 conservatives

00:18:42.680 bring guns

00:18:43.500 in case they

00:18:44.800 need them.

00:18:45.680 It's just

00:18:46.100 standard procedure

00:18:46.920 for a lot

00:18:47.400 of people.

00:18:51.260 True or

00:18:52.040 false, the

00:18:53.900 public needs

00:18:54.640 an advocate

00:18:55.400 for getting

00:18:56.600 us out of

00:18:57.560 the pandemic

00:18:58.720 constraints.

00:19:02.420 The public

00:19:03.280 needs an

00:19:03.740 advocate.

00:19:04.940 What we

00:19:05.340 have are

00:19:05.880 elected

00:19:06.260 representatives.

00:19:08.140 They're the

00:19:08.920 wrong people.

00:19:10.200 not by

00:19:11.640 personality

00:19:12.180 and not

00:19:12.640 by competence.

00:19:15.380 The problem

00:19:15.960 here is that

00:19:16.500 the public,

00:19:17.880 and this is

00:19:18.480 a rare

00:19:18.800 situation,

00:19:20.140 where the

00:19:20.520 public's

00:19:20.980 interest is

00:19:21.560 just not

00:19:21.980 the same

00:19:22.480 as the

00:19:22.800 government's

00:19:23.260 interest.

00:19:24.620 Normally,

00:19:25.280 they're really

00:19:25.660 in lock

00:19:26.080 step.

00:19:27.200 Normally,

00:19:27.680 the government

00:19:28.040 has to do

00:19:28.620 a good job

00:19:29.320 for the

00:19:29.720 people in

00:19:30.740 a way that

00:19:31.140 the people

00:19:31.480 can observe

00:19:32.260 and see,

00:19:33.500 and that

00:19:33.880 will help

00:19:34.240 them get

00:19:34.580 elected and

00:19:35.380 would be

00:19:35.840 good for

00:19:36.120 the politicians.

00:19:37.220 So, we've

00:19:37.700 designed a

00:19:38.280 really good

00:19:38.740 system.

00:19:39.160 You know,

00:19:40.320 compared to

00:19:40.840 the alternatives.

00:19:42.100 The republic

00:19:42.780 or democratic

00:19:44.360 processes within

00:19:45.480 is really

00:19:46.680 good.

00:19:47.480 Really good.

00:19:49.360 You know,

00:19:49.780 with laws,

00:19:50.600 of course,

00:19:51.140 but the best

00:19:52.160 we have.

00:19:53.400 But here's

00:19:54.560 the problem.

00:19:55.840 The government

00:19:56.520 has to manage

00:19:57.940 for minimum

00:19:58.820 death.

00:20:00.120 What does

00:20:00.900 everybody say

00:20:01.540 is the number

00:20:02.180 one job

00:20:02.940 of a government?

00:20:04.680 Protect the

00:20:05.780 citizens.

00:20:07.060 Am I right?

00:20:07.520 Everybody

00:20:08.560 would agree

00:20:09.020 with that.

00:20:09.800 The number

00:20:10.140 one job

00:20:10.720 of government

00:20:11.340 is to

00:20:12.520 protect

00:20:13.060 the citizens.

00:20:15.720 Somebody

00:20:16.200 says it's

00:20:16.680 not.

00:20:18.040 Really?

00:20:19.100 You would

00:20:19.440 disagree with

00:20:19.920 that statement?

00:20:20.860 I'm saying

00:20:21.300 that's the,

00:20:22.900 if you listen

00:20:23.960 to any

00:20:24.380 politician,

00:20:25.640 they will

00:20:26.020 tell you

00:20:26.320 that.

00:20:27.260 That their

00:20:27.900 job is to

00:20:28.680 protect people.

00:20:30.220 Now,

00:20:30.640 that doesn't

00:20:31.020 mean take

00:20:31.380 their freedom

00:20:31.840 away.

00:20:33.300 Right?

00:20:33.740 That means

00:20:35.100 protect them.

00:20:36.260 Make sure

00:20:36.560 you've got

00:20:37.000 law enforcement.

00:20:37.940 Make sure

00:20:38.160 you have

00:20:38.400 a national

00:20:38.800 defense.

00:20:40.180 Make sure,

00:20:41.020 you know,

00:20:41.500 maybe OSHA

00:20:42.320 and stuff.

00:20:42.880 Make sure

00:20:43.220 that you're

00:20:43.620 not doing

00:20:44.080 obviously

00:20:44.620 dangerous

00:20:45.120 things that

00:20:45.880 are just

00:20:46.160 ridiculous.

00:20:47.500 Now,

00:20:47.940 of course,

00:20:48.340 they might

00:20:48.600 go too

00:20:48.980 far,

00:20:49.380 and that's

00:20:49.660 another

00:20:49.900 conversation.

00:20:51.280 You know,

00:20:51.540 go too

00:20:51.880 far in

00:20:52.180 trying to

00:20:52.460 keep you

00:20:52.760 safe.

00:20:53.020 And I

00:20:53.740 think that's

00:20:54.160 our exact

00:20:54.640 situation

00:20:55.200 here.

00:20:56.560 What the

00:20:57.140 public wants

00:20:58.040 is an

00:20:59.740 objective

00:21:00.380 risk management

00:21:01.640 decision based

00:21:03.340 on the

00:21:03.660 best

00:21:03.900 information.

00:21:05.440 And for

00:21:05.800 most of

00:21:06.280 us,

00:21:06.540 that would

00:21:06.760 indicate

00:21:07.100 opening up

00:21:07.920 sooner than

00:21:09.560 the government

00:21:10.180 wants.

00:21:11.280 Am I right?

00:21:12.320 That the

00:21:12.700 public,

00:21:13.920 not everybody,

00:21:15.000 but the

00:21:15.240 public,

00:21:16.140 I'd say the

00:21:16.900 consensus is

00:21:17.880 clearly on the

00:21:18.720 side of

00:21:19.240 opening up

00:21:20.400 sooner than

00:21:20.940 later.

00:21:21.820 Would you

00:21:22.220 agree with

00:21:22.580 that?

00:21:23.300 I could be

00:21:23.700 wrong about

00:21:24.140 that, but

00:21:24.500 I think

00:21:24.740 that's true.

00:21:26.260 I see

00:21:26.560 one wrong.

00:21:29.360 But if

00:21:31.120 the public

00:21:31.580 were sure

00:21:32.420 that

00:21:32.860 they were

00:21:33.760 safe enough,

00:21:34.700 I'm pretty

00:21:35.140 sure that

00:21:35.540 they'd all

00:21:35.880 be on

00:21:36.460 that side.

00:21:37.660 Now,

00:21:37.980 here's the

00:21:38.300 problem.

00:21:39.400 You've got

00:21:39.780 a government

00:21:40.260 who has to

00:21:40.840 manage toward

00:21:41.800 minimizing

00:21:42.800 death, but

00:21:44.260 you've got a

00:21:44.740 public who

00:21:45.640 doesn't have

00:21:46.140 that same

00:21:46.860 single-minded

00:21:48.560 focus.

00:21:49.800 The public

00:21:50.260 wants to

00:21:50.760 live a life

00:21:51.400 that they

00:21:51.760 know has a

00:21:52.340 certain amount

00:21:52.740 of risks,

00:21:53.660 and once

00:21:54.160 they've been

00:21:54.520 informed,

00:21:55.600 and once

00:21:56.040 they've been

00:21:56.340 given some

00:21:56.940 reasonable tools

00:21:57.940 to deal with

00:21:58.480 the risk,

00:21:58.960 which we

00:21:59.300 have now,

00:21:59.740 the public

00:22:01.560 just doesn't

00:22:02.920 have the

00:22:03.200 same

00:22:03.420 objective.

00:22:04.620 Our

00:22:04.880 objective is

00:22:05.520 to get

00:22:05.780 out there

00:22:06.100 and live,

00:22:07.220 take some

00:22:07.660 chances.

00:22:08.940 The government's

00:22:09.620 objective is

00:22:10.220 to minimize

00:22:10.600 death.

00:22:11.160 They're just

00:22:11.380 not compatible.

00:22:13.320 And so I

00:22:13.980 submit to you

00:22:14.660 that the

00:22:15.080 public needs

00:22:15.740 an advocate,

00:22:17.580 actually somebody

00:22:18.540 whose job it

00:22:19.320 is, I don't

00:22:20.600 know how they

00:22:21.040 would ever be

00:22:21.640 appointed or

00:22:23.340 self-appointed

00:22:24.300 or something,

00:22:25.940 so that

00:22:26.700 somebody can

00:22:27.460 negotiate directly

00:22:28.820 with the

00:22:29.200 government,

00:22:30.200 because the

00:22:30.760 government are

00:22:31.300 not our

00:22:31.800 representatives on

00:22:32.940 this specific

00:22:33.700 question.

00:22:34.960 The government

00:22:35.440 are our

00:22:36.020 representatives on

00:22:36.960 basically everything

00:22:38.300 else.

00:22:39.260 It's just a weird

00:22:39.940 situation where

00:22:41.360 we should not

00:22:42.740 expect that they

00:22:44.720 would represent

00:22:45.300 us, because

00:22:47.420 they have

00:22:48.620 different objectives.

00:22:50.260 Now, that's

00:22:50.640 not their fault,

00:22:51.800 is it?

00:22:53.280 People manage

00:22:54.700 to their

00:22:55.060 incentives.

00:22:56.800 You can't

00:22:57.360 change that.

00:22:57.880 People manage

00:22:59.240 to their

00:23:01.000 own risk

00:23:01.740 management.

00:23:02.920 And the

00:23:03.180 politicians have

00:23:04.040 to manage for

00:23:04.740 the minimizing

00:23:06.000 death, and the

00:23:07.700 public doesn't.

00:23:09.300 So we need an

00:23:10.260 advocate.

00:23:11.680 Now, I don't

00:23:13.800 know I would be

00:23:14.340 the right choice

00:23:14.900 for that, but

00:23:15.840 there should be

00:23:16.420 somebody who at

00:23:17.440 least has something

00:23:19.040 like my skill

00:23:19.900 set, maybe more

00:23:21.400 credibility in a

00:23:22.600 variety of ways,

00:23:23.880 but something like

00:23:24.740 that.

00:23:25.700 We just need

00:23:26.240 somebody to speak

00:23:26.940 for the people,

00:23:27.620 because the

00:23:28.020 government can't

00:23:28.680 do that right

00:23:29.140 now.

00:23:30.720 All right.

00:23:32.580 There's a new

00:23:33.280 technology that

00:23:34.740 looks promising

00:23:35.680 that will allow

00:23:37.620 you to get a

00:23:38.120 vaccination without

00:23:39.020 a needle.

00:23:40.340 So there's a

00:23:41.180 little device that

00:23:42.360 blows focused

00:23:43.700 air into your

00:23:45.500 arm or whatever,

00:23:47.200 and somehow that

00:23:48.840 air can inject

00:23:50.380 enough of the

00:23:51.380 vaccination that

00:23:53.140 you don't need an

00:23:53.740 actual needle.

00:23:55.880 And as others

00:23:57.580 have observed,

00:23:59.640 we humans are

00:24:01.380 rationalizers, we're

00:24:02.720 not really rational

00:24:03.580 people.

00:24:04.600 And I do suspect

00:24:05.460 that, I'm just

00:24:07.480 going to throw a

00:24:08.480 wild-ass number

00:24:09.340 out, this has no

00:24:10.440 data or anything,

00:24:11.360 it's just based on

00:24:12.100 living in the

00:24:13.360 world.

00:24:14.020 I would bet

00:24:14.920 you, I will bet

00:24:16.940 you that of the

00:24:18.080 vaccine resistors,

00:24:20.080 25% of them are,

00:24:22.260 it's about the

00:24:22.920 needle.

00:24:23.960 They won't say

00:24:24.840 that necessarily.

00:24:26.160 They might make

00:24:26.740 an argument for

00:24:27.520 risk management,

00:24:28.720 et cetera.

00:24:29.420 But I feel like

00:24:30.080 at least 25%

00:24:31.600 have a needle

00:24:33.340 fear that has

00:24:34.480 influenced them to

00:24:35.420 think they have

00:24:35.980 some other reason.

00:24:37.420 That would be

00:24:37.920 normal, by the

00:24:38.780 way.

00:24:39.600 That would just

00:24:40.080 be how a normal

00:24:41.160 brain would work.

00:24:42.240 You would

00:24:42.720 rationalize that

00:24:43.440 stuff and make

00:24:44.480 it think that

00:24:45.000 you're making a

00:24:45.660 rational decision.

00:24:48.040 Air bubbles and

00:24:48.800 veins, I don't

00:24:49.420 know, I guess they

00:24:50.020 figured that out

00:24:50.640 somehow.

00:24:50.940 It's not like

00:24:52.680 they're shooting

00:24:53.120 into a vein.

00:24:54.260 It looks like

00:24:54.660 they're shooting

00:24:55.100 into your skin

00:24:56.580 somehow.

00:25:00.580 That's way too

00:25:01.320 high, Scott.

00:25:02.140 What would you

00:25:02.720 say, 10%?

00:25:04.100 10% maybe just

00:25:06.140 have fear of

00:25:06.660 needles.

00:25:07.160 Fear of needles

00:25:07.860 is a big thing.

00:25:10.380 Somebody says

00:25:10.900 2%?

00:25:11.720 Maybe.

00:25:12.800 I don't know.

00:25:13.400 But for some

00:25:14.020 people who

00:25:14.500 actually maybe

00:25:15.400 would want the

00:25:16.420 vaccination but

00:25:17.580 are afraid of the

00:25:19.180 needles, that might

00:25:19.780 make a difference

00:25:20.340 to them.

00:25:21.120 Again, I'm not

00:25:21.980 recommending you

00:25:22.700 get vaccinated.

00:25:24.360 Let me say that

00:25:25.240 as often as I

00:25:25.980 need to.

00:25:27.080 I'll give you the

00:25:27.880 pros and cons as

00:25:29.340 they develop.

00:25:30.980 So this is on

00:25:31.640 the pro side.

00:25:33.920 But it doesn't

00:25:34.540 mean you should

00:25:34.880 do it.

00:25:36.580 It just means

00:25:37.360 that there's lots

00:25:37.880 of pros and

00:25:38.380 cons and maybe

00:25:39.660 you should be

00:25:40.040 aware of them

00:25:40.460 all and then

00:25:41.420 make your own

00:25:41.960 decision.

00:25:45.960 All right.

00:25:47.920 Let's see what

00:25:48.520 else is going

00:25:48.980 on.

00:25:49.800 Here's the

00:25:50.380 name of that

00:25:50.840 company that's

00:25:51.360 making that air

00:25:53.300 vaccination thing

00:25:54.480 that just blows

00:25:55.200 air into you.

00:25:56.440 It's Diosynvax.

00:25:59.260 D-I-O-S-Y-N

00:26:01.900 like synthetic

00:26:03.360 vax.

00:26:05.440 And let me

00:26:06.620 give you some

00:26:07.200 advice.

00:26:08.420 I'm going to

00:26:09.000 give some

00:26:09.320 corporate advice

00:26:10.120 here to this

00:26:11.520 company.

00:26:12.860 So you can

00:26:13.640 just watch.

00:26:14.240 but this is

00:26:16.160 intended for

00:26:17.480 the CEO

00:26:18.340 of Diosynvax.

00:26:21.880 If you're

00:26:22.520 trying to make

00:26:23.100 a device to

00:26:24.840 get the people

00:26:26.560 who don't want

00:26:27.360 vaccinations,

00:26:29.480 a lot of them

00:26:30.520 would be

00:26:30.840 Christian.

00:26:32.180 You don't

00:26:32.860 want to name

00:26:33.560 your company

00:26:34.280 Diosynvax.

00:26:38.820 Because dying

00:26:39.700 is bad, sin

00:26:40.480 is bad, and

00:26:41.400 some people are

00:26:42.760 already anti-vax.

00:26:44.240 So Diosynvax

00:26:45.940 looks like

00:26:47.440 I hope they

00:26:49.380 didn't pay a

00:26:50.200 consultant for

00:26:50.840 that name.

00:26:51.940 You know,

00:26:52.120 there's sometimes

00:26:52.540 a consultant

00:26:53.160 will do that.

00:26:54.380 They should

00:26:54.960 pay a cartoonist

00:26:55.920 to check out

00:26:57.800 company names.

00:26:59.240 Because you know

00:26:59.740 what cartoonists

00:27:00.500 do really well?

00:27:02.680 Mock things.

00:27:05.320 We're really

00:27:06.020 good at that.

00:27:07.060 A lot of

00:27:07.500 practice.

00:27:08.680 So show me

00:27:09.480 your corporate

00:27:09.960 name and I

00:27:10.560 will tell you

00:27:11.020 exactly how I

00:27:11.940 will mock it.

00:27:12.760 And Diosynvax,

00:27:16.100 that's just

00:27:17.360 asking for it.

00:27:19.080 How many of

00:27:20.040 you believe

00:27:20.680 that Pfizer's

00:27:22.240 documents,

00:27:22.940 their own

00:27:23.420 documents,

00:27:24.640 show vastly

00:27:25.600 more vaccine-related

00:27:27.940 deaths than

00:27:29.980 you have been

00:27:30.580 told publicly?

00:27:32.320 How many of

00:27:33.360 you believe

00:27:33.960 that that's

00:27:34.580 in the news

00:27:35.820 and that

00:27:36.220 that's real?

00:27:38.440 That it's

00:27:39.120 actually just

00:27:39.700 news?

00:27:40.360 not a rumor,

00:27:42.220 but it's just

00:27:42.620 news.

00:27:43.760 How many of you

00:27:44.560 think it's a fact

00:27:45.500 that we now

00:27:46.900 know that

00:27:47.780 Pfizer's own

00:27:48.540 data shows

00:27:49.800 that vaccinations

00:27:50.700 are killing

00:27:52.260 way more

00:27:53.120 people than

00:27:54.800 had been

00:27:56.580 reported before?

00:27:57.420 How many

00:27:57.640 think that's

00:27:58.080 a fact?

00:27:58.560 jet air

00:28:01.340 injectors for

00:28:02.400 vaccines have

00:28:03.100 been around

00:28:03.540 since at

00:28:04.000 least the

00:28:04.340 50s,

00:28:05.000 Michael says.

00:28:06.720 Huh.

00:28:08.200 All right.

00:28:10.580 Well, here's

00:28:11.500 what Andres

00:28:12.440 Backhouse points

00:28:13.420 out, and I

00:28:14.480 always refer to

00:28:15.240 him as my

00:28:16.020 best source of

00:28:18.300 analyzing what

00:28:19.740 is and isn't

00:28:20.720 credible when it

00:28:21.680 comes to data.

00:28:23.000 He's really,

00:28:23.940 really good at it,

00:28:24.780 so that's why you

00:28:25.600 should follow

00:28:26.020 him, Andres

00:28:27.240 Backhouse.

00:28:29.080 And he took

00:28:31.240 a run at

00:28:31.660 Jordan Peterson

00:28:32.300 because Jordan

00:28:33.420 Peterson tweeted

00:28:35.340 that information

00:28:36.820 about all of

00:28:37.760 the deaths

00:28:38.740 with the

00:28:39.200 Pfizer vaccine,

00:28:41.000 according to

00:28:41.480 Pfizer's own

00:28:42.400 data.

00:28:43.560 But as Andres

00:28:44.720 points out,

00:28:45.880 that if you

00:28:46.440 actually read

00:28:47.320 the details of

00:28:48.760 it, it says

00:28:50.020 very clearly

00:28:50.660 that the deaths

00:28:51.440 are not

00:28:52.000 attributed to

00:28:53.120 the vaccination.

00:28:53.820 that's a

00:28:56.160 pretty big

00:28:56.480 difference.

00:28:57.840 Yes, there

00:28:58.240 were a lot

00:28:58.640 of deaths

00:28:59.180 because lots

00:29:02.740 and lots of

00:29:03.160 people got the

00:29:03.660 vaccination, and

00:29:05.240 there were a

00:29:05.560 lot of deaths,

00:29:07.100 but a huge

00:29:08.300 number of them

00:29:08.980 actually had

00:29:09.560 COVID at the

00:29:10.220 same time they

00:29:10.760 died.

00:29:11.860 They got the

00:29:12.420 vaccination, but

00:29:14.460 also got COVID,

00:29:15.720 either it was

00:29:16.300 after the first

00:29:17.940 vaccination or the

00:29:18.740 second.

00:29:19.440 So at the

00:29:20.260 very least, you

00:29:20.940 would have to

00:29:21.440 put a question

00:29:22.280 mark next to

00:29:22.940 the people who

00:29:23.400 died with

00:29:24.600 COVID, because

00:29:27.060 we know that

00:29:27.600 kills you.

00:29:28.800 How do you

00:29:29.140 know it was

00:29:29.440 the COVID and

00:29:30.060 not the

00:29:30.340 vaccination, or

00:29:31.400 the vaccinations

00:29:32.040 and not the

00:29:32.520 COVID?

00:29:33.220 We don't,

00:29:34.520 right?

00:29:35.300 So the point

00:29:36.100 is that these

00:29:37.320 big numbers are

00:29:38.080 simply the people

00:29:38.820 we know died.

00:29:40.360 It's not the

00:29:40.920 people we know

00:29:41.420 died because of

00:29:42.640 the vaccination.

00:29:44.420 If a lot of

00:29:45.140 them actually had

00:29:45.900 COVID, that's

00:29:47.740 pretty

00:29:48.640 questionable.

00:29:50.360 Now, am I

00:29:52.500 telling you that

00:29:53.120 these vaccinations

00:29:53.900 are safe?

00:29:54.720 No.

00:29:55.820 No.

00:29:56.940 Don't hear that.

00:29:58.420 Remember, this is

00:29:59.180 not the show that

00:29:59.980 goes binary.

00:30:01.500 Things are not

00:30:02.020 all good or

00:30:03.020 all bad.

00:30:04.300 Sometimes things

00:30:05.100 can be a little

00:30:05.800 good and a little

00:30:06.360 bit bad.

00:30:07.500 That's the theme

00:30:08.580 of this live

00:30:09.860 stream anyway.

00:30:11.260 And you

00:30:12.760 should not

00:30:13.380 believe that

00:30:14.300 these numbers

00:30:14.960 display an

00:30:16.900 actual number

00:30:17.600 of deaths.

00:30:18.040 deaths.

00:30:19.140 It could

00:30:19.840 be, but

00:30:21.220 it's unlikely.

00:30:22.940 It's unlikely.

00:30:24.980 It's very

00:30:25.680 unlikely, like

00:30:26.500 deeply unlikely.

00:30:28.020 As in, if you

00:30:29.300 had to bet your

00:30:29.860 own money against

00:30:30.580 it, you should

00:30:31.020 definitely bet

00:30:31.640 against it.

00:30:33.580 So, who

00:30:35.080 knows?

00:30:36.300 Who knows?

00:30:37.120 But don't

00:30:37.620 believe that this

00:30:38.280 data has been

00:30:38.960 proven in some

00:30:39.780 kind of a fact

00:30:40.500 and that the

00:30:41.160 numbers are

00:30:41.600 giant.

00:30:42.260 That's just

00:30:42.700 not the case.

00:30:43.760 All right.

00:30:45.320 Let's talk

00:30:46.040 about Dr.

00:30:46.900 Peter McCullough.

00:30:48.340 Who was on

00:30:49.720 Joe Rogan's

00:30:50.320 show.

00:30:50.720 I think he's

00:30:51.020 been on Fox.

00:30:51.960 He's been on

00:30:52.340 Laura Ingraham's

00:30:52.960 show.

00:30:53.880 And he's one of

00:30:55.080 the doctors who

00:30:55.800 has a, let's

00:30:56.560 say, a

00:30:56.800 contrarian view

00:30:57.800 about some

00:30:59.580 pandemic-y,

00:31:00.680 vaccination-y

00:31:01.420 stuff.

00:31:03.820 How many of

00:31:04.660 you are familiar

00:31:05.300 with Dr.

00:31:06.380 McCullough and

00:31:08.200 would find him

00:31:09.480 a credible

00:31:10.360 voice?

00:31:11.580 Go.

00:31:13.180 How many

00:31:13.860 find him

00:31:14.340 credible and

00:31:15.820 are familiar

00:31:16.280 with him?

00:31:16.660 On the

00:31:18.000 locals, we're

00:31:18.800 seeing just a

00:31:19.580 wall of

00:31:20.140 yeses.

00:31:21.460 One maybe,

00:31:22.220 don't know.

00:31:23.580 But yes,

00:31:24.120 yes, yes,

00:31:24.620 very credible.

00:31:26.140 Over on

00:31:27.160 YouTube, I'm

00:31:28.860 seeing yes,

00:31:29.620 yes, yes,

00:31:30.340 yes, yes,

00:31:30.780 yes, yes.

00:31:31.620 One no.

00:31:33.640 Talk to your

00:31:34.280 individual doctor,

00:31:35.340 good advice.

00:31:37.040 I mean, how do

00:31:38.260 you know your

00:31:38.640 individual doctor is

00:31:39.540 the smart one?

00:31:41.260 Very.

00:31:41.760 All right.

00:31:42.220 So almost

00:31:43.100 universally, you

00:31:43.960 would consider

00:31:44.420 him credible.

00:31:46.160 All right.

00:31:47.680 Good.

00:31:49.200 Excellent.

00:31:50.760 I was hoping

00:31:51.520 you'd say that.

00:31:53.000 Because here is

00:31:53.980 the part where

00:31:55.300 things get

00:31:55.820 interesting.

00:31:57.100 Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

00:32:01.220 Okay.

00:32:02.820 Here's my opinion

00:32:03.920 about his

00:32:05.060 credibility.

00:32:05.680 I don't know.

00:32:09.000 I don't know.

00:32:09.460 How would I

00:32:10.440 know?

00:32:11.940 Like, if he

00:32:12.840 says a bunch of

00:32:13.460 doctory, smart

00:32:14.600 sounding things,

00:32:15.380 how would I

00:32:15.720 know if it's

00:32:16.140 true?

00:32:17.780 No, I have

00:32:18.380 no way to

00:32:18.780 know.

00:32:19.860 I could check

00:32:20.700 his facts, as

00:32:21.460 people said,

00:32:22.420 but what have

00:32:23.160 I told you

00:32:23.580 about doing

00:32:24.340 your own

00:32:24.680 research?

00:32:26.220 Does that

00:32:26.760 work?

00:32:27.720 I've never

00:32:28.300 seen it work.

00:32:29.420 It never

00:32:29.820 works.

00:32:30.580 Do you know

00:32:30.940 when it works?

00:32:32.400 I'll tell you

00:32:32.900 when do your

00:32:33.540 own research

00:32:34.160 works.

00:32:34.700 It's a very

00:32:35.100 limited, very

00:32:36.660 limited situation.

00:32:37.620 doing your

00:32:39.480 own research

00:32:40.020 works if

00:32:41.120 your name

00:32:41.540 is Andres

00:32:42.700 Backhaus and

00:32:43.420 you have a

00:32:43.740 PhD in

00:32:44.320 economics.

00:32:47.000 If that's

00:32:47.740 the case

00:32:48.160 for you,

00:32:49.600 do your

00:32:50.060 own research.

00:32:50.780 Probably

00:32:51.040 tell you

00:32:51.380 something you

00:32:51.820 didn't know.

00:32:53.100 But for the

00:32:53.840 rest of us,

00:32:54.480 and I include

00:32:54.960 myself in

00:32:55.540 this category,

00:32:56.720 no, we

00:32:57.380 can't do

00:32:57.680 our own

00:32:58.000 research.

00:32:59.200 That's

00:32:59.640 ridiculous.

00:33:00.680 We'll just

00:33:01.120 confuse

00:33:01.520 ourselves.

00:33:02.540 We'll just

00:33:03.080 find the

00:33:03.480 things that

00:33:03.840 agree with

00:33:04.280 us and

00:33:04.660 come out of

00:33:05.660 the well

00:33:06.320 thinking we

00:33:06.900 proved it.

00:33:07.900 It's just a

00:33:08.660 confirmation

00:33:09.040 bias thing.

00:33:11.580 So many

00:33:11.940 of you

00:33:12.220 said,

00:33:12.680 Scott,

00:33:12.980 Scott,

00:33:13.240 Scott,

00:33:13.820 you are

00:33:14.520 showing some

00:33:15.680 doubt about

00:33:17.140 this doctor,

00:33:18.160 but you

00:33:19.280 didn't do

00:33:19.640 your own

00:33:19.960 research,

00:33:20.500 and you

00:33:20.800 didn't even

00:33:21.220 listen to

00:33:21.720 him.

00:33:22.940 And both

00:33:23.600 of those

00:33:23.920 things are

00:33:24.260 true.

00:33:25.060 I listened

00:33:25.520 to clips,

00:33:26.240 but I

00:33:26.460 didn't listen

00:33:26.840 to his

00:33:27.140 whole thing.

00:33:28.440 So can

00:33:28.940 I be

00:33:29.260 confident

00:33:29.740 about his

00:33:31.600 credibility if

00:33:32.460 I haven't

00:33:32.880 listened to

00:33:33.280 his whole

00:33:33.620 thing?

00:33:34.160 I've only

00:33:34.660 listened to

00:33:35.060 a little

00:33:35.300 bit.

00:33:35.520 And I'm

00:33:38.300 not an

00:33:38.580 expert.

00:33:39.200 And I

00:33:39.500 haven't done

00:33:39.900 my own

00:33:40.200 research.

00:33:42.280 How confident

00:33:43.440 can I be

00:33:44.100 in my

00:33:44.840 opinion?

00:33:45.940 What do

00:33:46.260 you think?

00:33:47.520 Well,

00:33:48.200 let me poke

00:33:50.440 at it from a

00:33:51.160 few different

00:33:52.260 angles and

00:33:53.400 find out which

00:33:54.840 parts of this

00:33:55.480 you would

00:33:55.760 disagree with.

00:33:56.380 number one.

00:33:59.620 This is what

00:34:00.340 I call a

00:34:00.940 category

00:34:01.440 problem.

00:34:03.620 If you

00:34:04.160 tried to

00:34:04.540 figure out

00:34:04.900 what's true

00:34:05.440 or not,

00:34:06.060 the first

00:34:06.620 thing I

00:34:06.980 do is

00:34:07.420 say,

00:34:07.680 what category

00:34:08.380 is it?

00:34:09.440 I'll give

00:34:09.780 you an

00:34:09.980 example.

00:34:11.300 Your

00:34:11.540 neighbor

00:34:11.840 says he

00:34:13.280 saw a

00:34:13.880 UFO and

00:34:15.260 it abducted

00:34:16.000 his family

00:34:16.500 and took

00:34:16.960 him away

00:34:17.340 and then

00:34:17.740 returned

00:34:18.100 them intact

00:34:18.760 the next

00:34:19.220 day.

00:34:19.480 That's a

00:34:21.240 category that

00:34:22.780 you can

00:34:23.120 reasonably

00:34:23.580 assume most

00:34:25.220 of the

00:34:25.420 things in

00:34:25.820 it are not

00:34:26.240 true.

00:34:27.600 Does it

00:34:28.100 mean that

00:34:28.900 your neighbor

00:34:29.300 was not

00:34:30.000 abducted by

00:34:31.060 an alien?

00:34:31.740 Nope.

00:34:32.680 Nope.

00:34:33.440 Does not

00:34:33.960 mean that.

00:34:35.040 This might

00:34:35.520 be the one

00:34:35.980 time it's

00:34:36.380 true.

00:34:38.440 But your

00:34:39.760 starting point

00:34:40.740 if you hear

00:34:41.700 somebody was

00:34:42.280 abducted by

00:34:42.920 an alien is

00:34:43.640 I'm going

00:34:45.080 to say 95%

00:34:46.360 chance that

00:34:47.020 didn't happen.

00:34:48.420 How often

00:34:49.220 would you

00:34:49.560 be right

00:34:50.060 if you

00:34:51.280 just went

00:34:51.660 into it

00:34:52.020 with a

00:34:52.320 95%

00:34:53.620 chance that

00:34:54.200 did not

00:34:54.620 happen?

00:34:55.480 Well so

00:34:55.940 far you'd

00:34:56.340 be right

00:34:56.680 every time.

00:34:58.080 Every time.

00:34:59.960 How about

00:35:00.700 if you

00:35:01.220 heard that

00:35:01.580 your neighbor

00:35:02.140 had built

00:35:03.880 a fusion

00:35:05.280 reactor in

00:35:06.780 his garage

00:35:07.700 which is

00:35:08.980 by the way

00:35:09.580 actually things

00:35:10.340 that have

00:35:10.600 happened.

00:35:11.380 I think

00:35:11.600 somebody

00:35:11.900 actually did

00:35:12.400 build a

00:35:12.800 I think

00:35:13.680 more than

00:35:14.140 once

00:35:14.560 somebody

00:35:15.580 thinks they

00:35:16.280 built a

00:35:16.860 fusion reactor

00:35:17.920 in their

00:35:18.280 garage.

00:35:19.220 that category

00:35:21.240 how often

00:35:22.580 is that

00:35:22.940 category

00:35:23.680 turning out

00:35:24.460 to be

00:35:24.740 true?

00:35:25.200 Well zero

00:35:25.740 so far

00:35:26.460 but there

00:35:28.420 might actually

00:35:29.160 someday be

00:35:30.100 somebody who

00:35:30.700 made a

00:35:31.000 fusion reactor

00:35:31.680 in their

00:35:32.000 garage.

00:35:33.420 Could happen.

00:35:34.820 How about

00:35:35.120 the inventor

00:35:36.260 who invented

00:35:37.000 a cure

00:35:38.640 for cancer

00:35:39.200 and it's

00:35:41.260 going to

00:35:41.700 trial and

00:35:42.800 man does it

00:35:43.440 look good.

00:35:44.360 It worked

00:35:44.800 on the

00:35:45.060 animals,

00:35:45.620 it worked

00:35:45.880 on the

00:35:46.160 test do.

00:35:46.580 it's

00:35:47.200 going to

00:35:47.460 cure

00:35:47.760 most

00:35:48.620 cancers.

00:35:50.780 That's a

00:35:51.560 category.

00:35:53.360 How often

00:35:53.940 does an

00:35:54.680 individual

00:35:55.240 claim in

00:35:57.000 the cancer

00:35:57.600 curing

00:35:58.160 category

00:35:58.700 turn out

00:35:59.200 to be

00:35:59.520 true?

00:36:03.640 Rarely.

00:36:05.240 5%.

00:36:05.840 Now we

00:36:06.720 get to

00:36:07.000 keep all

00:36:07.360 the 5%

00:36:07.980 that are

00:36:08.400 true and

00:36:09.640 so actually

00:36:10.360 cancer cures

00:36:11.600 are building

00:36:12.100 up and

00:36:12.480 actually getting

00:36:13.500 pretty substantial

00:36:14.580 at this

00:36:14.880 point.

00:36:15.460 But they're

00:36:15.840 all the

00:36:16.160 exceptions.

00:36:17.660 It's just

00:36:18.080 that the

00:36:18.340 exceptions we

00:36:18.960 keep, we

00:36:19.940 sort of forget

00:36:20.480 about the

00:36:20.880 ones that

00:36:21.220 didn't work.

00:36:22.660 So those

00:36:23.480 are three

00:36:23.880 categories and

00:36:24.640 there are

00:36:24.840 lots more

00:36:25.460 where as

00:36:26.500 soon as you

00:36:26.880 hear the

00:36:27.200 category,

00:36:28.560 your brain

00:36:29.120 should

00:36:29.440 automatically

00:36:30.240 go into

00:36:30.800 the probably

00:36:32.140 not mode.

00:36:34.100 But still,

00:36:35.660 it could be

00:36:36.200 the 5%.

00:36:37.100 Right?

00:36:38.780 Somebody said

00:36:39.500 to me,

00:36:39.960 Scott,

00:36:41.080 wouldn't that

00:36:41.620 describe you

00:36:42.640 in 2016?

00:36:44.580 Weren't you

00:36:45.260 in the

00:36:45.600 5% who

00:36:47.120 said Trump

00:36:47.620 was going

00:36:47.980 to win

00:36:48.260 that election

00:36:48.940 even though

00:36:50.420 almost all

00:36:51.560 the experts

00:36:52.140 said no?

00:36:53.420 So Scott,

00:36:54.220 aren't you

00:36:54.520 being a

00:36:54.860 hypocrite?

00:36:55.760 Because you

00:36:56.140 are exactly

00:36:56.780 what you

00:36:57.660 describe as

00:36:58.380 non-credible.

00:36:59.700 To which I

00:37:00.360 say,

00:37:01.400 good point.

00:37:04.000 Exactly.

00:37:05.720 If you

00:37:06.400 believed me

00:37:07.160 in 2016,

00:37:09.060 you might

00:37:09.760 have made

00:37:10.060 a bad

00:37:10.400 decision.

00:37:10.860 I

00:37:11.000 don't

00:37:11.060 know.

00:37:11.140 I

00:37:13.000 don't

00:37:13.140 because I

00:37:15.180 was a

00:37:15.500 category

00:37:16.060 that should

00:37:17.440 have been

00:37:17.680 wrong

00:37:18.080 95%

00:37:19.400 of the

00:37:19.620 time.

00:37:21.440 But

00:37:21.960 my 5%

00:37:23.900 came through.

00:37:25.240 Now,

00:37:25.520 I think

00:37:26.000 it's true

00:37:26.460 because I

00:37:27.680 could see

00:37:28.020 I had

00:37:29.340 some extra

00:37:30.620 information.

00:37:32.360 So it

00:37:32.860 wasn't so

00:37:33.320 much that

00:37:34.620 I was a

00:37:35.480 rogue.

00:37:36.280 I just

00:37:36.820 had the

00:37:37.100 information

00:37:37.500 you didn't

00:37:37.920 have.

00:37:38.220 If you

00:37:38.820 had trained

00:37:39.260 as a

00:37:39.920 persuader

00:37:40.420 and other

00:37:41.760 people who

00:37:42.240 had also

00:37:42.600 had that

00:37:42.940 training

00:37:43.240 could see

00:37:43.740 it too.

00:37:44.620 So that

00:37:44.960 was the

00:37:45.220 special case.

00:37:46.320 But I

00:37:46.860 agree totally

00:37:47.560 that if you

00:37:48.900 were going

00:37:49.120 to bet

00:37:49.380 money on

00:37:50.000 it,

00:37:51.060 the smart

00:37:51.640 money was

00:37:52.080 betting

00:37:52.300 against me.

00:37:54.080 You get

00:37:54.680 that,

00:37:54.940 right?

00:37:55.860 I got that

00:37:56.620 one right,

00:37:57.200 but the smart

00:37:57.820 money would

00:37:58.240 have bet

00:37:58.460 against me.

00:37:59.020 And even

00:37:59.320 I would

00:37:59.660 have bet

00:37:59.840 against me.

00:38:01.100 If I

00:38:01.560 were looking

00:38:01.960 at me

00:38:02.240 from the

00:38:02.520 outside,

00:38:02.980 I would

00:38:03.160 have bet

00:38:03.340 against me

00:38:03.920 because I

00:38:04.580 was a

00:38:04.860 category

00:38:05.240 that's

00:38:05.580 usually

00:38:05.820 wrong.

00:38:07.500 All

00:38:07.620 right.

00:38:07.760 So I

00:38:08.940 say also

00:38:09.560 that the

00:38:10.100 rogue

00:38:10.480 doctor

00:38:11.060 category,

00:38:12.180 the doctor

00:38:13.340 who is

00:38:13.780 saying

00:38:13.980 things

00:38:14.380 that are

00:38:14.620 quite

00:38:14.960 different

00:38:15.360 than the

00:38:15.800 mainstream,

00:38:16.900 is a

00:38:17.620 category

00:38:18.080 that is

00:38:18.720 95%

00:38:19.620 wrong.

00:38:21.080 So if

00:38:21.320 you're going

00:38:21.560 to bet,

00:38:22.700 bet against

00:38:23.300 it every

00:38:23.720 time.

00:38:24.720 5% of

00:38:25.500 the time

00:38:25.660 you'll

00:38:25.860 lose your

00:38:26.140 bet.

00:38:27.500 Now,

00:38:28.100 is Dr.

00:38:29.800 McAuliffe

00:38:30.320 in the

00:38:31.380 5%

00:38:32.160 or the

00:38:32.660 95%?

00:38:34.600 I don't

00:38:35.360 know.

00:38:36.820 I don't

00:38:37.180 know.

00:38:38.140 How would

00:38:38.820 I know?

00:38:40.180 How do

00:38:40.760 you know?

00:38:42.380 How could

00:38:42.780 anybody know?

00:38:44.420 It's

00:38:44.680 unknowable.

00:38:45.940 I'll tell

00:38:46.300 you what

00:38:46.600 people said

00:38:47.300 to me.

00:38:47.600 They said,

00:38:48.460 Scott,

00:38:48.820 Scott,

00:38:48.980 Scott,

00:38:49.260 listen to

00:38:49.720 the whole

00:38:50.180 thing.

00:38:51.280 If you

00:38:51.640 listen to

00:38:52.040 the whole

00:38:52.460 thing,

00:38:52.960 it's way

00:38:53.480 more

00:38:53.700 credible.

00:38:55.860 Do I

00:38:56.520 agree?

00:38:57.920 Absolutely.

00:38:59.300 If you

00:38:59.940 listen to

00:39:00.380 the entire

00:39:01.040 presentation

00:39:01.680 of anybody

00:39:02.380 who's

00:39:02.820 wrong,

00:39:03.660 it will

00:39:04.260 look really

00:39:04.760 credible by

00:39:05.440 the time

00:39:05.720 you're done.

00:39:06.740 Also,

00:39:07.160 anybody

00:39:07.520 who's

00:39:07.780 right.

00:39:09.300 Those

00:39:09.740 two will

00:39:10.140 look the

00:39:10.480 same to

00:39:10.820 you because

00:39:12.120 you can't

00:39:12.740 really judge

00:39:13.540 this rogue

00:39:14.960 doctor.

00:39:16.160 If he

00:39:16.720 makes a

00:39:17.220 claim,

00:39:17.540 I'm not

00:39:17.820 going to

00:39:17.960 look it

00:39:18.240 up.

00:39:19.020 I mean,

00:39:19.220 I could,

00:39:20.000 but I'm

00:39:20.300 not.

00:39:21.500 So,

00:39:22.160 be very,

00:39:23.420 very careful.

00:39:23.960 credible.

00:39:24.660 Now,

00:39:25.180 let me give

00:39:26.040 you a

00:39:26.360 couple of

00:39:26.800 hints that

00:39:27.960 are by

00:39:28.300 no means

00:39:29.000 the end

00:39:31.280 of the

00:39:31.540 story.

00:39:32.500 I'll tell

00:39:33.020 you one

00:39:33.320 thing that

00:39:33.720 is biasing

00:39:34.320 me terribly,

00:39:35.900 and I'm

00:39:36.420 going to

00:39:36.560 give you a

00:39:36.920 little persuasion

00:39:37.940 lesson here.

00:39:38.600 Now,

00:39:39.660 I want to be

00:39:40.020 clear,

00:39:41.200 and this is a

00:39:42.140 very subtle

00:39:42.680 point,

00:39:43.080 but it's so

00:39:43.440 important.

00:39:45.300 This doesn't

00:39:46.200 mean he's

00:39:46.940 not credible.

00:39:47.820 I'm going to

00:39:48.220 play you a

00:39:49.220 clip of Dr.

00:39:50.060 McCullough's

00:39:50.640 voice.

00:39:52.480 I'm going to

00:39:52.840 put it in

00:39:53.200 the context

00:39:53.740 of persuasion,

00:39:55.260 and I'm going

00:39:55.640 to tell you

00:39:56.040 that the

00:39:56.460 voice technique

00:39:58.220 he uses

00:39:59.060 is non-persuasive,

00:40:04.280 but that

00:40:05.280 doesn't mean

00:40:05.740 wrong.

00:40:07.300 Okay,

00:40:07.620 let me be

00:40:08.080 clear.

00:40:08.860 I'm not

00:40:09.220 saying he's

00:40:09.700 wrong.

00:40:10.860 I'm saying

00:40:11.240 he's choosing

00:40:11.880 a style of

00:40:12.600 communication

00:40:13.200 which instantly

00:40:14.900 smacks as

00:40:16.000 non-credible

00:40:16.700 to me.

00:40:18.080 And I've

00:40:18.980 described this

00:40:19.560 before.

00:40:19.880 Did I

00:40:20.660 describe this

00:40:21.240 only on

00:40:21.700 locals,

00:40:22.320 or did I

00:40:22.700 tell the

00:40:23.020 YouTube

00:40:23.240 people to?

00:40:24.720 Have I

00:40:25.320 described the

00:40:26.300 pleading

00:40:26.960 voice?

00:40:28.920 There are

00:40:29.500 two ways

00:40:30.000 to talk

00:40:30.600 when you're

00:40:31.180 persuading.

00:40:32.280 One is the

00:40:32.960 matter-of-fact

00:40:33.660 voice,

00:40:34.840 where you're

00:40:35.220 just laying

00:40:35.660 out the

00:40:35.960 facts,

00:40:36.920 and here

00:40:37.240 they are,

00:40:38.420 nothing to

00:40:39.020 talk about.

00:40:40.800 That's

00:40:41.280 persuasive.

00:40:42.600 But if

00:40:42.980 you're saying

00:40:43.420 this,

00:40:44.620 look at the

00:40:45.460 data,

00:40:46.420 look at the

00:40:46.820 data,

00:40:48.320 that's the

00:40:48.900 pleading

00:40:49.820 voice.

00:40:50.680 That's

00:40:51.180 begging the

00:40:51.900 viewer to

00:40:52.400 believe you

00:40:52.960 because you

00:40:54.220 don't believe

00:40:54.780 yourself.

00:40:56.760 That's why

00:40:57.340 it's non-persuasive.

00:40:58.720 You sound like

00:40:59.700 a person who

00:41:00.300 hasn't convinced

00:41:00.940 themselves.

00:41:02.220 Because why are

00:41:03.000 you talking that

00:41:03.580 way?

00:41:03.840 Now, if you

00:41:05.760 want to see an

00:41:06.240 example of the

00:41:07.020 best persuasive

00:41:08.560 voice, it's

00:41:10.120 just really

00:41:10.620 good.

00:41:11.420 There's a

00:41:12.520 series on

00:41:13.720 Hulu, I

00:41:14.640 think, called

00:41:15.800 Dope Sick.

00:41:17.580 It's the

00:41:18.060 story of

00:41:18.740 Oxycontin and

00:41:21.040 the Purdue

00:41:22.240 company and

00:41:23.140 the Sackler

00:41:23.720 family.

00:41:24.620 Now, I've

00:41:24.900 just watched

00:41:25.300 the first part

00:41:27.500 of it.

00:41:28.200 But there's a

00:41:28.960 scene in there,

00:41:29.620 if you watch

00:41:30.180 that, there's a

00:41:30.940 salesperson who

00:41:32.280 was played by

00:41:33.040 an actor, and

00:41:34.280 then the actor

00:41:34.960 is giving his

00:41:36.000 pitch to a

00:41:36.740 doctor.

00:41:38.660 Listen to

00:41:39.400 that.

00:41:40.720 You want to

00:41:41.520 see how to

00:41:41.960 modulate your

00:41:42.620 voice to be

00:41:44.260 persuasive.

00:41:45.520 I don't know

00:41:46.420 if that was

00:41:46.920 the actor's,

00:41:48.120 what the actor

00:41:48.860 brought to the

00:41:49.460 role, or if

00:41:50.960 it was directed

00:41:51.680 that way or

00:41:52.480 written that way.

00:41:53.400 It's a little

00:41:54.000 unclear.

00:41:54.960 But some

00:41:55.580 combination of

00:41:56.320 the writing and

00:41:56.920 the acting and

00:41:57.520 the directing

00:41:58.020 gives you

00:41:59.280 perfect persuasion

00:42:01.580 voice.

00:42:02.540 Now, when

00:42:03.000 you watch

00:42:03.320 it, don't

00:42:04.340 be fooled by

00:42:04.920 the fact that

00:42:05.420 the actor

00:42:05.780 also has a

00:42:07.740 very pleasant

00:42:08.620 voice, a

00:42:09.840 nice, rich,

00:42:11.660 deep kind of

00:42:12.640 voice that has

00:42:13.440 nothing to do

00:42:14.080 with what I'm

00:42:14.480 talking about.

00:42:16.100 That's not

00:42:16.940 technique.

00:42:17.780 That's just

00:42:18.200 something he

00:42:18.660 was born with.

00:42:20.120 He may have

00:42:20.680 a little

00:42:21.020 technique.

00:42:22.340 But just

00:42:23.060 listen to the

00:42:23.820 matter-of-factness

00:42:25.020 as he lays

00:42:26.460 out the facts,

00:42:27.960 which you find

00:42:29.000 out later, or

00:42:29.900 actually you find

00:42:30.600 out soon, are

00:42:31.400 not facts.

00:42:32.060 But the

00:42:32.960 way that

00:42:33.620 salesperson lays

00:42:35.000 it out, damn,

00:42:36.840 you would think

00:42:37.260 that was true.

00:42:38.280 It is so

00:42:38.940 persuasive.

00:42:40.180 Even knowing

00:42:40.720 it's not true, you

00:42:41.440 think it sounds

00:42:42.040 pretty good.

00:42:43.380 All right?

00:42:43.960 Now compare that

00:42:44.820 with, I'm going to

00:42:45.860 play just a clip,

00:42:47.960 and look for,

00:42:49.600 this is Dr.

00:42:50.740 McAuliffe on

00:42:52.580 Joe Rogan's show.

00:42:54.840 And listen to the

00:42:55.980 voice and see if it

00:42:57.060 sounds like matter-of-fact

00:42:58.240 or pleading with

00:42:59.700 you to believe.

00:43:00.760 These books are

00:43:01.840 basically nonfiction.

00:43:03.640 They have a thousand

00:43:05.060 citations in the

00:43:05.960 Bregan book showing

00:43:06.980 how it was

00:43:07.740 coordinated and

00:43:08.860 planned.

00:43:09.300 Now Bobby Kennedy

00:43:09.940 has his book out,

00:43:10.940 The Real Anthony

00:43:11.680 Fauci, the most

00:43:12.780 mentioned physician

00:43:14.040 in that book.

00:43:14.860 I can tell you that

00:43:16.120 if you want to find

00:43:16.880 the evidence that

00:43:18.120 Moderna was working

00:43:18.860 on the vaccine

00:43:19.520 before the virus

00:43:20.720 ever emanated out

00:43:22.460 of the lab, if you

00:43:23.060 wanted to find the

00:43:23.740 collusions and the

00:43:25.400 operations between

00:43:26.240 the Gates Foundation

00:43:26.900 and Gavi and

00:43:27.560 CEPI and Pfizer

00:43:28.360 and Moderna and

00:43:29.360 the vaccine

00:43:29.700 manufacturers and

00:43:30.580 the Wuhan lab and

00:43:31.700 the National Institutes

00:43:32.360 of Health and

00:43:32.740 Ralph Barrett and

00:43:33.420 University of North

00:43:34.020 Carolina and

00:43:34.540 how all this was

00:43:35.880 organized.

00:43:36.460 If you want to see

00:43:37.040 the Johns Hopkins

00:43:38.000 planning seminar

00:43:38.900 called the Spars

00:43:40.040 pandemic in 2017

00:43:41.720 where they had a

00:43:42.580 symposium, people

00:43:43.220 showed up, they

00:43:44.020 wrote up their

00:43:44.540 symposium findings,

00:43:45.500 they published this,

00:43:46.440 it says it's going

00:43:47.260 to be a coronavirus,

00:43:48.940 it's going to be

00:43:49.660 related to MERS

00:43:50.360 and SARS.

00:43:53.500 Now, again, I

00:43:55.200 have to be really

00:43:56.160 clear.

00:43:57.780 The way he

00:43:58.800 communicates biases

00:44:01.200 me to think that

00:44:02.400 it's not credible.

00:44:04.320 But it could just

00:44:06.180 be a technique

00:44:06.820 problem.

00:44:08.580 You get that,

00:44:09.260 right?

00:44:09.800 It could be,

00:44:12.860 oh, even in the

00:44:14.000 not sped up

00:44:14.740 playback.

00:44:16.100 Yeah, I think

00:44:16.820 mine was sped up.

00:44:18.420 So don't be fooled

00:44:19.440 by the rapidness

00:44:20.900 of his talking.

00:44:21.840 That's not what

00:44:22.360 I'm talking about.

00:44:23.220 I'm talking about

00:44:24.040 the pleading

00:44:25.380 quality.

00:44:25.920 which you could

00:44:27.160 hear it at slow

00:44:27.940 motion the same.

00:44:29.080 It would also

00:44:29.540 sound pleading.

00:44:31.400 But, oh, okay.

00:44:34.880 Somebody's saying,

00:44:35.960 let's see if I can

00:44:36.840 change the speed.

00:44:38.260 I don't know if I

00:44:38.800 have that option on

00:44:39.920 the Twitter playback.

00:44:42.920 It doesn't, I can't

00:44:44.920 do that quickly.

00:44:46.120 But if you'd like to

00:44:46.920 do that yourself,

00:44:47.640 that's a fair, that's

00:44:48.520 a fair comment, by

00:44:49.380 the way, that

00:44:50.260 speeding it up

00:44:51.000 changes how it's

00:44:52.340 received.

00:44:52.780 But I think you'll

00:44:53.920 see that if you

00:44:54.480 play it slowly, you

00:44:56.640 get the pleading

00:44:57.520 just, it's just

00:44:59.120 slower.

00:45:00.180 But you're right.

00:45:01.100 That wasn't fair to

00:45:02.120 show it.

00:45:03.000 So let me acknowledge

00:45:04.300 that wasn't fair to

00:45:06.420 show it at a higher

00:45:07.300 speed.

00:45:07.720 I didn't do that

00:45:08.240 intentionally.

00:45:08.820 I must have some

00:45:09.420 setting in YouTube.

00:45:12.460 But, doesn't mean

00:45:14.840 he's wrong.

00:45:16.340 Right?

00:45:17.040 You've got to be

00:45:17.680 really clear.

00:45:18.520 Doesn't mean he's

00:45:19.200 wrong.

00:45:20.420 But he's using a

00:45:21.500 communication style

00:45:22.500 that screams not

00:45:24.220 credible, whether it

00:45:26.580 is or not.

00:45:28.320 All right.

00:45:28.880 So I hope you

00:45:29.620 learned something.

00:45:32.540 I hope you learned

00:45:33.440 something from that.

00:45:35.440 Let me tell you the

00:45:36.600 other thing that

00:45:37.680 gave me pause.

00:45:40.580 Joe asked him about

00:45:41.620 masks.

00:45:43.660 Now, what do you

00:45:44.580 think a doctor

00:45:45.620 should say about

00:45:46.700 masks?

00:45:47.340 Well, he gave a

00:45:50.240 very indirect answer

00:45:51.660 which I felt was

00:45:52.900 playing to the

00:45:53.560 audience.

00:45:55.260 It looked like his

00:45:57.380 honest answer may

00:45:58.520 have not been

00:45:59.240 exactly what Joe

00:46:00.760 Rogan's audience

00:46:01.580 wanted to hear.

00:46:03.540 That was just a

00:46:04.480 feeling I got.

00:46:05.320 Again, I'm not a

00:46:06.180 mind reader, so I

00:46:07.640 can't know what's in

00:46:08.360 his head.

00:46:09.000 That would be

00:46:09.520 unfair.

00:46:10.700 But I'll tell you

00:46:11.780 the way I received

00:46:12.560 it was he was

00:46:14.500 tap dancing on

00:46:15.520 masks.

00:46:17.340 And the moment I

00:46:18.040 heard him tap

00:46:18.740 dance on masks, I

00:46:21.540 lost all belief in

00:46:22.620 anything else he

00:46:23.460 had to say.

00:46:25.180 So as a general

00:46:26.160 rule, if somebody

00:46:27.180 has a large message

00:46:28.480 and there's only one

00:46:29.620 part of it you

00:46:30.160 understand, and you

00:46:31.620 know that part

00:46:32.240 doesn't make sense,

00:46:34.120 you are free to

00:46:35.620 extend that lack of

00:46:36.840 credibility to the

00:46:37.780 whole.

00:46:38.540 That would not be

00:46:39.280 irrational.

00:46:40.180 If you knew there

00:46:41.820 was just one part of

00:46:42.700 it you could be

00:46:43.300 certain about.

00:46:43.960 So I'm still

00:46:47.320 seeing some

00:46:47.780 complaints that

00:46:48.540 the speeding it

00:46:49.300 up changed

00:46:49.960 everything.

00:46:52.840 Let's look at it

00:46:54.060 again tomorrow.

00:46:55.000 I'll check it on

00:46:55.920 lower speed.

00:46:56.920 I don't think it

00:46:57.680 changed everything.

00:46:59.520 I think it did

00:47:00.980 exacerbate it, but

00:47:02.780 the effect is still

00:47:03.640 there.

00:47:03.860 You know, the

00:47:09.080 pitch is not

00:47:11.620 important except

00:47:12.820 for how it's

00:47:13.860 modulated.

00:47:15.940 Right?

00:47:16.560 So it doesn't

00:47:17.280 matter that he

00:47:17.740 has a high-pitched

00:47:18.600 voice or a low-pitched

00:47:19.500 voice.

00:47:19.920 That's not part of

00:47:20.920 persuasion.

00:47:22.220 You know, the

00:47:22.760 low-pitched

00:47:23.420 executive voice, it

00:47:26.540 can have a little

00:47:27.140 persuasive value, but

00:47:28.240 you don't really need

00:47:28.900 that.

00:47:29.460 It's optional.

00:47:30.120 He has a great

00:47:32.900 track record with

00:47:33.800 his COVID patients.

00:47:35.340 Do you know who

00:47:35.840 else has a great

00:47:36.780 track record with

00:47:37.800 their COVID patients?

00:47:40.200 Everybody.

00:47:42.440 Because we've got

00:47:43.240 really good

00:47:43.640 treatments now.

00:47:45.720 Plus, most people

00:47:46.680 get better.

00:47:49.140 All right.

00:47:52.200 By the way,

00:47:52.960 Dope Sick, that

00:47:53.800 is really well

00:47:55.820 done.

00:47:56.240 I thought that I

00:47:57.040 wouldn't like it

00:47:57.680 because it was

00:47:58.100 just going to be

00:47:58.660 sad and poorly

00:48:00.540 made.

00:48:01.040 But it's actually

00:48:01.500 made so well.

00:48:02.820 Just the artistry

00:48:05.020 of making it is

00:48:07.360 really high, so

00:48:08.080 it's really good

00:48:08.720 to watch.

00:48:12.440 All right.

00:48:15.880 So somebody

00:48:16.700 asked if a

00:48:18.500 cartoonist is

00:48:19.320 credible.

00:48:19.980 So I tweeted

00:48:21.260 his question because

00:48:22.200 he had a little

00:48:22.620 graph there.

00:48:23.920 The last I

00:48:24.360 checked it, 59%

00:48:26.380 said I was

00:48:27.060 credible, 22%

00:48:29.080 say I'm a

00:48:29.720 paid operative.

00:48:32.360 22%.

00:48:32.880 22%, round it

00:48:35.300 up to 25%.

00:48:38.880 Yes, that's

00:48:40.520 exactly the

00:48:41.120 number of people

00:48:41.640 who answer

00:48:42.180 every poll

00:48:43.060 wrong, no

00:48:45.080 matter the

00:48:45.560 question.

00:48:47.200 All right.

00:48:48.900 Here's a list

00:48:49.940 of how to

00:48:50.400 participate in a

00:48:51.280 debate if you

00:48:52.200 have nothing to

00:48:52.820 say to me.

00:48:54.480 You could use

00:48:55.380 any of these

00:48:55.900 phrases to show

00:48:56.820 that you have

00:48:57.200 put no thought

00:48:57.900 whatsoever into

00:48:58.760 your point of

00:48:59.360 view, and you

00:49:01.360 just wanted to

00:49:01.840 say something.

00:49:03.180 So sometimes we

00:49:03.940 just like to say

00:49:04.600 something, be part

00:49:05.740 of it.

00:49:06.700 So if you'd like to

00:49:07.540 be part of a

00:49:08.240 conversation with

00:49:09.060 me on some

00:49:09.820 topic, and you

00:49:11.520 don't have anything

00:49:12.320 whatsoever to say

00:49:13.260 of use, use any

00:49:15.020 of these phrases.

00:49:17.480 He's jumping the

00:49:18.360 shark now.

00:49:19.900 He jumped the

00:49:20.680 shark now.

00:49:21.180 Well, look who's

00:49:23.520 the pointy hair

00:49:24.120 boss now.

00:49:26.140 I guess we

00:49:27.520 know who's the

00:49:28.060 pointy hair boss

00:49:28.840 now.

00:49:30.540 That's just like

00:49:31.380 the matrix.

00:49:34.200 That reminds me

00:49:35.180 of Soylent Green.

00:49:38.140 Oh, oh, so

00:49:39.480 you're an

00:49:39.780 apologist.

00:49:40.720 You're an

00:49:41.040 apologist now.

00:49:42.080 Can we call you

00:49:42.700 an apologist?

00:49:43.900 You apologist?

00:49:44.460 I saw it with

00:49:47.500 my own eyes,

00:49:49.080 Scott.

00:49:50.120 Don't tell me it

00:49:50.860 didn't happen.

00:49:51.620 I saw it with

00:49:53.020 my own eyes.

00:49:54.860 Heard it with

00:49:55.440 my own ears.

00:49:59.240 So say that.

00:50:01.580 Any sheep

00:50:02.300 references are

00:50:03.040 good.

00:50:04.200 Sheep.

00:50:05.260 You're a sheep.

00:50:06.100 Somebody's a

00:50:06.600 sheep.

00:50:07.720 Everybody's a

00:50:08.420 sheep.

00:50:09.460 Any kind of

00:50:10.040 sheep reference

00:50:10.680 is good.

00:50:12.160 Also, 1984,

00:50:13.820 the book,

00:50:14.460 Hitler, and

00:50:15.340 anything with

00:50:15.920 fascists, of

00:50:16.600 course.

00:50:16.900 Just throw that

00:50:17.520 into any

00:50:18.140 reference.

00:50:19.800 Each of these

00:50:20.520 go with every

00:50:21.040 argument, really.

00:50:23.000 Now, on the

00:50:23.860 sheep reference,

00:50:25.320 may I say

00:50:25.860 this?

00:50:27.400 I think the

00:50:28.200 sheep reference

00:50:28.860 is the lowest

00:50:29.700 level of

00:50:30.500 thinking in

00:50:31.660 the pandemic.

00:50:34.080 Oh, yeah.

00:50:35.100 Scott is such

00:50:35.740 a sophist.

00:50:38.060 I have to add

00:50:38.820 that to my

00:50:39.240 list.

00:50:40.160 Yeah, that's

00:50:40.480 a good one.

00:50:40.900 You know

00:50:45.180 everybody's a

00:50:45.960 sheep, right?

00:50:47.340 So the

00:50:47.840 funniest thing

00:50:48.320 about 2021 is

00:50:49.700 sheep calling

00:50:50.520 other sheep

00:50:51.060 sheep, and

00:50:52.660 then the

00:50:52.980 sheep that

00:50:53.360 they're calling

00:50:53.760 sheep are

00:50:54.260 saying, I'm

00:50:55.620 not a sheep,

00:50:56.200 you're the

00:50:56.500 sheep.

00:50:57.740 Like, nobody's

00:50:58.440 aware that we're

00:50:59.180 all sheep.

00:51:01.340 Well, here's

00:51:02.040 what I mean by

00:51:02.580 that.

00:51:03.520 With the

00:51:04.180 vaccinations, the

00:51:06.220 anti-vaxxers are

00:51:07.240 saying, you're

00:51:08.220 sheep, and you're

00:51:09.180 afraid of

00:51:09.940 COVID, that's

00:51:11.220 why you're

00:51:11.540 getting the

00:51:11.860 vaccination.

00:51:13.360 But then the

00:51:13.920 sheep say, but

00:51:15.240 wait a minute, are

00:51:15.840 you afraid of

00:51:16.420 the vaccination?

00:51:18.780 I'm afraid of

00:51:19.580 the COVID, you're

00:51:21.120 afraid of the

00:51:21.600 vaccination, doesn't

00:51:23.380 that make both of

00:51:24.020 us sheep?

00:51:26.180 I think we're

00:51:26.960 both sheep, because

00:51:28.360 we're both afraid of

00:51:29.160 something, and we

00:51:29.920 don't know.

00:51:31.640 So as soon as you

00:51:32.720 think it's the

00:51:33.280 other person who's

00:51:34.120 a sheep, you've

00:51:35.840 left the ground of

00:51:36.860 rational conversation.

00:51:39.980 Here's something I

00:51:40.860 didn't know.

00:51:41.600 This is also an

00:51:42.420 Andres Beckhaus

00:51:43.500 discovery, meaning

00:51:46.040 that the data was

00:51:47.020 already out there,

00:51:47.920 easy to find, but

00:51:48.820 for some reason he

00:51:49.640 got it and you

00:51:50.240 didn't.

00:51:51.640 Did you think the

00:51:52.540 suicides went up

00:51:53.540 during the

00:51:54.200 lockdowns?

00:51:55.840 How many of you

00:51:56.700 think the suicides

00:51:57.820 are up during the

00:51:59.060 pandemic?

00:52:00.460 Reveal yourselves.

00:52:02.300 How many say

00:52:03.040 suicides are up?

00:52:07.260 They're down.

00:52:09.180 But, not equally.

00:52:13.640 Turns out that

00:52:14.520 they're down in

00:52:16.500 every category

00:52:17.820 except, no wait,

00:52:21.100 they're down, no

00:52:23.860 they're up in every

00:52:24.620 category except adult

00:52:26.180 white men, I think.

00:52:27.520 Did I read that

00:52:29.320 right?

00:52:29.520 Yeah, I think

00:52:33.060 that's it.

00:52:34.820 So, only white

00:52:36.100 adults had

00:52:39.040 fewer suicides.

00:52:41.440 But other groups

00:52:42.320 had a little bit

00:52:42.880 more, but overall

00:52:43.840 because there's a

00:52:44.820 lot of white

00:52:45.460 adults killing

00:52:46.120 themselves.

00:52:47.900 So, I guess it's

00:52:48.800 not men, it's

00:52:49.440 adults.

00:52:51.900 And it says the

00:52:52.780 overall decline, I

00:52:53.940 think this was from

00:52:54.940 NPR, the overall

00:52:56.660 decline was driven

00:52:57.560 mostly, almost

00:52:58.760 entirely, by a

00:53:00.420 drop in suicides

00:53:01.300 among white

00:53:01.900 people, who

00:53:04.060 apparently kill

00:53:04.800 themselves at a

00:53:05.420 higher rate than

00:53:06.000 any other group.

00:53:07.600 Did you know

00:53:07.980 that?

00:53:08.860 Did you know that

00:53:09.500 white people kill

00:53:10.320 themselves at the

00:53:11.060 highest rate?

00:53:11.660 Now, how do you

00:53:16.920 define equity?

00:53:20.740 Because I've said

00:53:21.680 this before,

00:53:22.700 shouldn't you just

00:53:23.300 measure everybody's

00:53:25.400 level of happiness

00:53:26.280 and if they're

00:53:27.760 similar, you're

00:53:28.400 done, right?

00:53:29.580 You don't have to

00:53:30.260 give anybody extra

00:53:31.180 money or anything if

00:53:32.060 everybody's equally

00:53:32.760 happy the way they

00:53:33.520 are.

00:53:34.520 But if white

00:53:35.860 people are killing

00:53:36.580 themselves at the

00:53:37.480 highest rate, I

00:53:40.900 think that's a

00:53:41.420 red flag, or

00:53:43.420 maybe we're

00:53:43.960 looking at this

00:53:44.580 whole equality

00:53:45.700 thing in a less

00:53:47.960 than optimal way.

00:53:51.860 But I guess

00:53:52.300 for, anyway, so

00:53:57.260 I have some

00:53:58.100 theories about

00:53:59.120 that.

00:54:00.540 Here's one of

00:54:01.320 them.

00:54:02.380 I'm not sure

00:54:03.040 that we counted

00:54:03.900 suicides correctly

00:54:05.740 during the

00:54:06.700 pandemic, or in

00:54:08.560 general.

00:54:09.220 Here's why.

00:54:09.820 A lot of

00:54:10.860 suicidal people

00:54:11.700 are also drug

00:54:12.880 addicts.

00:54:14.720 Because why

00:54:15.340 wouldn't you be,

00:54:16.080 really?

00:54:16.640 If you're

00:54:17.240 suicidal, it

00:54:18.440 almost doesn't

00:54:19.080 make sense not

00:54:19.800 to do drugs.

00:54:21.540 Okay, I

00:54:22.180 shouldn't say

00:54:22.540 that.

00:54:22.980 Take that

00:54:23.320 back.

00:54:23.900 That was an

00:54:24.300 irresponsible thing

00:54:25.120 to say.

00:54:26.260 Bring it back.

00:54:27.700 There's some

00:54:28.300 things that are

00:54:28.760 true, but you

00:54:29.280 just shouldn't

00:54:29.680 say.

00:54:31.060 So I

00:54:32.280 shouldn't have

00:54:32.600 said that, but

00:54:33.920 it's true.

00:54:34.260 And I

00:54:38.520 have a, well,

00:54:40.240 I won't tell

00:54:40.820 you why I

00:54:42.240 think this, but

00:54:43.660 I do know

00:54:44.240 that people

00:54:46.040 who take too

00:54:46.780 many drugs and

00:54:47.580 stop worrying

00:54:48.260 about overdosing

00:54:49.120 might be in the

00:54:50.140 suicidal group.

00:54:52.140 So I think

00:54:52.620 some percentage

00:54:53.980 of the overdoses

00:54:55.460 are, let's

00:54:56.800 say, an

00:54:57.520 accidental

00:54:59.320 death without

00:55:01.880 much regard for

00:55:03.240 whether they

00:55:03.680 would die,

00:55:04.860 meaning that

00:55:05.460 people didn't

00:55:06.340 protect their

00:55:06.980 own life because

00:55:08.720 they weren't that

00:55:09.240 concerned about

00:55:09.820 living.

00:55:10.720 Is that suicide?

00:55:12.060 If you do

00:55:12.560 things that you

00:55:13.100 know could kill

00:55:13.680 you because

00:55:15.100 you're not

00:55:15.480 interested in

00:55:16.320 living, it's

00:55:18.100 suicide-ish, even

00:55:19.460 if you didn't

00:55:19.900 know what would

00:55:20.320 happen on that

00:55:20.900 particular day.

00:55:22.340 You might be

00:55:22.900 just redlining

00:55:25.320 how much drugs

00:55:26.180 you're taking,

00:55:27.100 but not really

00:55:28.000 planning to die.

00:55:29.660 You're just

00:55:30.240 okay with it if

00:55:30.980 it happens.

00:55:31.500 I don't know.

00:55:33.940 So I would

00:55:35.100 question the

00:55:35.880 data, but

00:55:36.540 if you

00:55:39.660 remember, I

00:55:40.600 don't know if

00:55:42.160 I'm remembering

00:55:42.820 it right.

00:55:43.220 Help me with

00:55:43.680 my memory.

00:55:44.520 I feel as

00:55:45.260 though I

00:55:45.880 predicted that

00:55:46.600 during the

00:55:47.180 pandemic there

00:55:48.280 would be fewer

00:55:49.460 suicides.

00:55:52.020 And I think he

00:55:52.740 was that people

00:55:54.900 would be in

00:55:55.760 close quarters with

00:55:56.640 their families.

00:55:57.800 They wouldn't be

00:55:58.740 bullied at school

00:55:59.540 the same way.

00:56:01.240 And that there

00:56:02.060 would just be

00:56:02.460 sort of less

00:56:02.940 opportunity because

00:56:04.020 we'd all just be

00:56:04.700 around each other

00:56:05.640 and I guess our

00:56:09.360 lives would be

00:56:10.200 constrained, but

00:56:12.220 you'd be with

00:56:12.780 your family more

00:56:13.460 even if you

00:56:13.880 didn't like it.

00:56:15.220 I just felt like

00:56:16.560 the situation was

00:56:17.940 we'd be watched

00:56:19.160 too much and

00:56:20.460 there would be

00:56:20.780 less of it.

00:56:22.020 Now I don't know

00:56:22.600 if that was a good

00:56:23.140 prediction or not,

00:56:23.980 but I did not

00:56:25.660 predict that there

00:56:26.280 would be more of it

00:56:26.960 early on.

00:56:27.520 Later on when

00:56:28.560 the statistics

00:56:29.240 seemed to show

00:56:30.080 that there was

00:56:30.480 more of it,

00:56:31.380 I think I

00:56:31.980 adopted that view.

00:56:36.600 Yeah, Red Fury

00:56:37.520 is asking,

00:56:38.220 did Scott really

00:56:39.000 say that?

00:56:39.580 That's what I'm

00:56:40.100 asking.

00:56:40.940 I'm asking because

00:56:42.040 I might have a

00:56:42.820 false memory of

00:56:43.540 that.

00:56:44.320 And I know that

00:56:44.960 I had at least

00:56:45.480 two different views.

00:56:46.540 I think I started

00:56:47.360 with, oh, I'm

00:56:47.980 seeing lots of

00:56:48.460 yeses on locals.

00:56:49.640 People do

00:56:50.060 remember.

00:56:52.500 I started with

00:56:53.660 the view that

00:56:54.660 there would be

00:56:55.360 fewer of them,

00:56:56.060 but I changed

00:56:57.680 it when the

00:56:58.360 data said

00:56:58.960 otherwise, but

00:56:59.820 apparently it

00:57:00.280 doesn't.

00:57:01.040 Apparently the

00:57:01.560 data doesn't

00:57:02.100 say otherwise.

00:57:03.340 Anyway, that

00:57:04.700 is about all I

00:57:05.520 have to do for

00:57:07.100 today.

00:57:10.040 Loneliness, yes.

00:57:11.720 There was less

00:57:12.680 loneliness, I

00:57:13.400 imagined, during

00:57:14.320 the pandemic.

00:57:15.640 Weirdly.

00:57:17.160 Good.

00:57:17.760 Thanks for

00:57:18.080 reminding me.

00:57:20.500 I'm now going

00:57:21.460 to do something

00:57:22.140 that will change

00:57:23.800 the lives of

00:57:24.720 approximately one

00:57:26.060 percent of

00:57:26.780 you.

00:57:27.940 Want to stay

00:57:28.680 around for

00:57:29.040 that?

00:57:29.920 It'll be

00:57:30.300 fast.

00:57:31.420 Ninety-nine

00:57:31.980 percent of

00:57:32.440 you, no

00:57:32.940 difference.

00:57:33.940 One percent of

00:57:34.680 you, I'm going

00:57:35.520 to change your

00:57:35.980 life right now.

00:57:37.360 I went

00:57:38.220 approximately 60

00:57:40.200 years of my

00:57:40.780 life believing

00:57:41.420 that I had

00:57:41.960 terrible allergies,

00:57:43.260 and those

00:57:43.880 allergies were

00:57:44.500 all the time.

00:57:47.280 I started

00:57:48.400 experimenting by

00:57:49.460 cutting out

00:57:50.120 different food

00:57:50.840 groups to

00:57:52.440 see if maybe I

00:57:53.360 had a food

00:57:53.860 allergy that I

00:57:55.140 was fooling

00:57:55.680 myself into

00:57:56.320 thinking it

00:57:56.780 was just

00:57:57.120 some kind

00:57:59.020 of grass

00:58:01.040 allergy or

00:58:01.540 something.

00:58:02.720 And finally,

00:58:04.400 I took out

00:58:05.040 of my life

00:58:05.720 one item,

00:58:06.900 which was

00:58:07.420 salad dressing.

00:58:10.060 It turns

00:58:10.460 out salad

00:58:10.900 dressing has

00:58:11.520 this additive

00:58:12.400 called sulfites.

00:58:14.820 I think it

00:58:15.680 keeps it from

00:58:16.960 spoiling or

00:58:17.640 something.

00:58:18.600 So,

00:58:18.960 sulfites.

00:58:20.100 Because I

00:58:20.720 first noticed

00:58:21.260 that I became

00:58:21.940 allergic to

00:58:22.960 alcohol,

00:58:23.820 and I

00:58:24.020 couldn't

00:58:24.200 figure out

00:58:24.640 why.

00:58:25.240 It's sort

00:58:25.580 of a

00:58:25.780 mysterious

00:58:26.140 thing.

00:58:27.500 But I

00:58:28.820 cut out a

00:58:29.440 salad from

00:58:30.140 my life,

00:58:31.400 so to get

00:58:32.020 rid of the

00:58:32.340 salad dressing,

00:58:33.280 and my

00:58:34.020 allergies

00:58:34.400 completely

00:58:35.340 transformed.

00:58:36.280 I do have

00:58:36.680 some kind of

00:58:37.020 baseline allergies,

00:58:37.960 but it went

00:58:38.660 from the worst

00:58:39.380 thing in the

00:58:39.760 world to just

00:58:40.460 sort of a

00:58:41.060 small bother.

00:58:42.700 Now,

00:58:43.740 here's the

00:58:44.240 first tip.

00:58:45.280 You should

00:58:45.620 do that if

00:58:46.400 you have

00:58:46.680 allergies.

00:58:47.760 Yeah,

00:58:48.020 wine is the

00:58:48.560 worst.

00:58:49.360 You should

00:58:49.900 do that if

00:58:50.340 you have

00:58:50.540 allergies.

00:58:51.200 Try to

00:58:51.780 rigorously

00:58:53.780 stick to a

00:58:55.300 certain kind

00:58:55.800 of diet for

00:58:56.440 a few weeks,

00:58:57.800 and then

00:58:58.260 maybe take

00:58:59.020 out one

00:58:59.480 item,

00:59:00.660 just one

00:59:01.140 item,

00:59:01.600 keep the

00:59:02.000 same diet

00:59:02.440 minus that

00:59:02.980 one item,

00:59:03.700 and then

00:59:04.100 just keep

00:59:04.480 repeating that.

00:59:05.940 Because I

00:59:06.540 believe that a

00:59:07.200 lot of you

00:59:07.560 have food

00:59:08.320 allergies,

00:59:08.920 not necessarily

00:59:09.560 the same

00:59:09.920 one I

00:59:10.200 have,

00:59:10.740 but I

00:59:11.100 think a

00:59:11.360 lot of

00:59:11.620 you have

00:59:11.940 food

00:59:12.480 allergies

00:59:12.940 that you

00:59:14.340 think are

00:59:14.840 regular

00:59:15.240 allergies.

00:59:16.660 Now,

00:59:17.020 in my

00:59:17.320 case,

00:59:17.720 I went

00:59:18.120 to test

00:59:18.560 this the

00:59:18.960 other

00:59:19.120 day,

00:59:19.740 and I

00:59:20.120 said to

00:59:20.340 myself,

00:59:20.820 I want

00:59:21.460 to be

00:59:21.700 positive.

00:59:22.480 It's the

00:59:22.820 salad dressing.

00:59:24.020 So my

00:59:24.620 first salad

00:59:25.420 in months,

00:59:26.920 and for

00:59:27.440 three days,

00:59:28.220 I could

00:59:28.520 hardly

00:59:28.980 breathe.

00:59:31.320 It took

00:59:31.980 days for

00:59:33.620 it to

00:59:33.860 die down.

00:59:34.740 Days.

00:59:36.180 And I

00:59:37.560 stayed off

00:59:38.000 salad for

00:59:38.380 a few

00:59:38.620 days,

00:59:38.920 and now

00:59:39.180 I'm back

00:59:39.980 to normal.

00:59:41.260 So about

00:59:42.800 1% of

00:59:43.520 you are

00:59:43.860 going to

00:59:44.060 look for

00:59:44.360 sulfites,

00:59:44.960 and here's

00:59:45.320 the trick.

00:59:46.160 They're not

00:59:46.680 listed on

00:59:47.340 the package.

00:59:48.560 How about

00:59:49.940 that?

00:59:51.000 Apparently,

00:59:51.720 it's one

00:59:51.960 of those

00:59:52.220 ingredients you

00:59:53.360 don't have

00:59:53.960 to list.

00:59:55.300 But it

00:59:56.060 typically is

00:59:56.680 in dressings.

00:59:58.420 If you

00:59:59.160 eat whole

00:59:59.620 foods,

01:00:00.160 well,

01:00:00.440 here's the

01:00:01.000 easy way

01:00:01.380 to test

01:00:01.760 it.

01:00:02.320 Just eat

01:00:02.820 whole foods

01:00:03.600 for a

01:00:04.120 week.

01:00:05.120 Just

01:00:05.360 nothing

01:00:05.940 that's

01:00:06.200 packaged

01:00:06.560 and

01:00:07.020 nothing

01:00:07.260 that's

01:00:07.960 a

01:00:08.440 sauce.

01:00:09.960 Just see.

01:00:11.340 If you

01:00:11.980 eat nothing

01:00:12.600 but whole

01:00:13.040 foods for a

01:00:13.620 week,

01:00:14.120 you will

01:00:14.700 feel really

01:00:15.160 different.

01:00:15.460 I've

01:00:16.520 tried that

01:00:17.040 and I

01:00:17.740 hate it

01:00:18.300 because I

01:00:18.880 don't want

01:00:19.200 to eat

01:00:19.360 whole foods

01:00:19.860 all the

01:00:20.160 time.

01:00:20.580 It's too

01:00:20.840 much of a

01:00:21.220 pain in

01:00:21.460 the ass.

01:00:21.840 It's not

01:00:22.140 delicious.

01:00:23.140 But you

01:00:23.760 will feel

01:00:24.160 different.

01:00:24.840 I guarantee

01:00:25.460 it.

01:00:26.060 You'll feel

01:00:26.500 it.

01:00:27.560 All right,

01:00:27.900 if that's

01:00:28.160 your last

01:00:28.500 tip of

01:00:28.780 the day,

01:00:29.360 I've got

01:00:29.620 to run

01:00:29.800 and do

01:00:30.000 something.

01:00:30.580 Bye for

01:00:31.000 now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 14, 2021

Episode 1592 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Mass Brainwashing Operations Going on Right Now

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript