Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1592 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Mass Brainwashing Operations Going on Right Now

00:00:00.600 Wow, it's going to be a great day today.

00:00:04.320 And do you know why?

00:00:05.500 Well, for starters, you found your way to Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:09.880 and that identifies you as, well, smarter than average,

00:00:15.000 probably sexier, I think you'll live longer,

00:00:17.820 and I've got a strong intuition that your antibodies are way above average.

00:00:22.880 That's how awesome you are.

00:00:24.820 But do you think this will be a good day for the live stream?

00:00:28.460 Yes, it's going to be the best day ever in the history of the universe,

00:00:32.120 and all you need to get going is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:34.640 a tank or a chelice or a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:42.940 I like coffee.

00:00:44.580 Yeah, it's a different mug. We'll talk about that.

00:00:47.480 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:51.000 It's the dopamine of the day.

00:00:53.240 It's the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:55.260 It's called the Simultaneous Sip and Happens Now Go.

00:00:58.460 Ah, yeah, that's so good.

00:01:04.700 Well, I have the non-standard mug.

00:01:06.480 I know you're interested in all things coffee.

00:01:09.600 Because my kitchen was being worked on yesterday,

00:01:12.240 and I cleverly took everything that I would need out of the kitchen

00:01:16.500 and put it in a different room

00:01:18.560 so that while the kitchen was being worked on

00:01:21.000 and I didn't have access to it

00:01:22.280 because the floor was being worked on,

00:01:25.480 that I would have everything I needed.

00:01:28.240 And the one thing I forgot,

00:01:30.420 I even moved the coffee maker, all the coffee.

00:01:34.140 I forgot a mug.

00:01:36.540 So here I was, all prepared yesterday,

00:01:38.580 and I didn't have a mug to put my coffee in.

00:01:42.120 How unhappy was I?

00:01:43.840 Well, I drove immediately to the local Starbucks

00:01:47.160 and bought myself a couple of mugs.

00:01:49.800 Anyway, how many of you have seen my pinned tweet

00:01:55.220 in which I asked for people to show me all their best memes for 2021?

00:02:00.280 Has anybody spent any time looking at that?

00:02:04.260 Let me just say,

00:02:06.400 oh, my God.

00:02:10.200 Think about the funniest thing you've seen all year.

00:02:13.180 It might have been Dave Chappelle.

00:02:15.500 Very funny.

00:02:17.280 Maybe there was some event or some friend of yours.

00:02:20.580 The funniest thing that happened to you all year.

00:02:23.040 Just think about what that is.

00:02:25.620 Okay, got that in your mind?

00:02:26.860 The funniest thing,

00:02:27.860 the thing you laughed at the most all year.

00:02:30.280 Now multiply that by about five

00:02:32.820 and go look at the comments

00:02:34.960 to my pinned tweet asking for memes.

00:02:39.320 You will, I actually, this is not a joke.

00:02:43.220 I'm going to say something that sounds like obvious hyperbole.

00:02:46.460 Literally, meaning the actual word literally.

00:02:50.420 No joke.

00:02:51.720 I had to stop reading them for health reasons.

00:02:55.860 No joke.

00:02:56.440 I swear to God, that is a literal truth.

00:03:00.820 I had to take time off and go back in

00:03:04.120 because I laughed so hard.

00:03:07.820 Not a joke.

00:03:09.420 I thought I was going to hurt something.

00:03:11.980 It was actually dangerous.

00:03:14.340 I don't even remember the last time I laughed that hard.

00:03:16.960 Now here's the thing that is a little humor writing tip.

00:03:22.660 You ready?

00:03:25.000 Humor, if you look at these memes

00:03:27.140 and you look at any one individually,

00:03:29.520 you might love it, you might laugh.

00:03:31.600 But when you see them all as a collective,

00:03:35.220 you know, you read a bunch of them on different topics,

00:03:37.840 it has a whole different effect.

00:03:39.860 And the effect is it just brings you into this absurdity world

00:03:45.120 where everything's absurd for a while

00:03:47.760 and you can just go live there for a while.

00:03:49.940 If you just see one meme, you're like boop, boop,

00:03:52.680 you're in and out.

00:03:53.620 It's like you weren't ever there.

00:03:55.360 But if you read them all at once

00:03:57.700 and you just sort of live in them for a while,

00:04:00.820 you will cry.

00:04:02.100 I mean, you will cry laughing

00:04:05.740 until I was feeling like

00:04:08.840 something was going to give out in my actual guts.

00:04:15.220 I can't recommend it enough.

00:04:18.400 Do yourself a favor.

00:04:20.260 Just spend 10 minutes.

00:04:22.540 That's all I'm asking.

00:04:23.960 If you don't cry,

00:04:26.140 I will be very surprised.

00:04:28.240 Cry laughing, that is.

00:04:29.240 Speaking of things to laugh at,

00:04:35.500 I was reading an article,

00:04:36.800 I think it was in BuzzFeed,

00:04:38.320 in which women were saying 0.98

00:04:39.500 what they also saw in Pete Davidson.

00:04:42.560 You know, Pete Davidson has been dating

00:04:44.820 a bunch of A-list celebrity women

00:04:46.960 that you would say to yourself,

00:04:50.200 or at least men tend to say this,

00:04:52.420 how does he get all these women? 1.00

00:04:55.560 Right?

00:04:56.240 And so women were asked what they saw in him.

00:05:00.240 I love some of the answers.

00:05:04.660 For example,

00:05:06.580 he's such a mess,

00:05:07.960 I mean, I'm paraphrasing the answers,

00:05:09.500 so this is my words,

00:05:11.100 but this idea,

00:05:12.960 that he's such a mess

00:05:13.860 that you're pretty sure he won't judge you.

00:05:17.060 What do you think of that?

00:05:19.040 He's such a basket case,

00:05:20.760 which, you know,

00:05:21.780 he's very overt about,

00:05:23.420 very transparent.

00:05:24.840 He'll tell you what a basket case he is

00:05:26.620 and has been,

00:05:27.940 and that it makes you comfortable around him.

00:05:31.040 True?

00:05:32.240 I think so.

00:05:33.700 I think you're more comfortable around people

00:05:35.640 who clearly have more problems than you do.

00:05:39.160 That's one thing.

00:05:40.420 Now, he's also tall,

00:05:41.600 he's successful,

00:05:42.420 he's funny,

00:05:43.520 you know,

00:05:43.820 he's getting rich,

00:05:45.760 which didn't matter to the specific women he was with, 0.99

00:05:48.380 but, you know,

00:05:50.140 you can see all those things as well.

00:05:51.900 But here's the funniest part.

00:05:54.820 Somebody,

00:05:55.460 it was a tweet

00:05:56.840 that was part of the article,

00:05:58.580 somebody described Pete Davidson

00:06:00.300 as looking like a wet cigarette.

00:06:11.020 That's good.

00:06:12.800 I mean, that's really good.

00:06:13.760 I've seen people describe me

00:06:17.480 as looking like a thumb,

00:06:19.340 and, you know,

00:06:19.900 I laugh at that too.

00:06:21.480 So, you know,

00:06:22.300 I don't want to make fun of people's looks.

00:06:24.040 I don't generally do that.

00:06:25.260 But when somebody makes a,

00:06:26.980 like a spot-on

00:06:28.540 kind of analogy,

00:06:31.740 a wet cigarette,

00:06:33.080 I don't think that could be any better,

00:06:34.740 could it?

00:06:35.800 I mean,

00:06:36.080 just in terms of cruel descriptions of people.

00:06:38.940 I've been on the receiving end

00:06:40.140 of lots of cruel descriptions,

00:06:41.560 and I can tell you

00:06:42.940 that when they're done well,

00:06:44.200 they're actually just hilarious,

00:06:45.980 even if it's about you.

00:06:48.300 So,

00:06:48.900 I'd like to think

00:06:49.820 that he would laugh at that too,

00:06:51.180 because it's just so clever.

00:06:54.740 So,

00:06:55.260 I think that women know 1.00

00:06:56.380 that he's not going to think

00:06:57.820 he's better than them.

00:07:00.840 But,

00:07:02.540 and somebody else said

00:07:03.340 he's a nice guy,

00:07:04.600 but he's sort of confident

00:07:06.360 in who he is.

00:07:09.080 I think,

00:07:09.500 have you ever heard the phrase,

00:07:10.580 people are comfortable

00:07:12.460 in their own skin?

00:07:14.500 In other words,

00:07:14.960 it doesn't matter who you are,

00:07:16.100 but are you comfortable

00:07:17.060 being that person?

00:07:18.220 And if you are,

00:07:18.880 other people are comfortable

00:07:19.800 around you.

00:07:21.020 Now,

00:07:21.440 I'm not sure

00:07:22.240 that describes

00:07:23.240 Pete Davidson,

00:07:24.920 because that would require

00:07:25.920 reading his mind,

00:07:27.200 and we can't do that.

00:07:28.400 But I would say

00:07:29.000 it looks like that,

00:07:30.420 you know,

00:07:30.660 from the outside.

00:07:31.960 It looks like

00:07:32.680 he's someone

00:07:33.800 who's completely

00:07:34.800 confident

00:07:35.880 that he is

00:07:37.960 just him,

00:07:38.400 and he's not

00:07:39.400 anybody else

00:07:40.040 that he's not

00:07:40.420 trying to be.

00:07:41.600 So,

00:07:42.060 the fact that he's

00:07:42.880 putting no effort

00:07:43.660 into trying to look

00:07:44.580 like somebody else,

00:07:46.620 I think that gives him

00:07:47.540 a little credit,

00:07:48.140 doesn't it?

00:07:49.360 I think he's likable.

00:07:51.820 I mean,

00:07:52.140 you know,

00:07:52.900 I like everybody

00:07:53.780 with a sense of humor.

00:07:56.460 So,

00:07:57.040 I know I would like him

00:07:58.200 if he were in the same room.

00:08:00.300 So,

00:08:00.580 you got that.

00:08:01.480 But here's the other thing

00:08:02.360 that I think people

00:08:03.060 are missing

00:08:03.480 in the story.

00:08:05.260 The story is about

00:08:06.100 how all these

00:08:07.180 top,

00:08:09.520 let's say,

00:08:10.360 top celebrity

00:08:11.020 and attractive women 1.00

00:08:12.860 all like him.

00:08:14.240 Is that the real story?

00:08:16.580 Because there's a part

00:08:17.420 of the story

00:08:17.860 they're leaving out.

00:08:20.500 None of them

00:08:21.160 wanted to marry him.

00:08:23.920 Am I right?

00:08:26.180 Why isn't that the story?

00:08:28.600 The story should be

00:08:29.580 zero people

00:08:30.700 wanted to marry

00:08:31.460 Pete Davidson.

00:08:33.180 Now,

00:08:33.640 I don't know

00:08:33.900 if he wanted

00:08:34.320 to get married.

00:08:35.000 Maybe not.

00:08:36.100 But,

00:08:37.060 I'm not sure

00:08:38.220 that women 0.97

00:08:38.620 see him

00:08:39.080 as a keeper.

00:08:40.880 I think they might

00:08:41.740 see him as

00:08:42.320 just a great guy

00:08:43.280 to hang around with.

00:08:44.440 Because he looks

00:08:45.020 like he'd be fun.

00:08:45.960 I mean,

00:08:46.180 how would it not be fun?

00:08:48.080 It would be hard

00:08:48.900 to even,

00:08:50.060 like,

00:08:50.280 could you even

00:08:50.760 picture in your mind

00:08:52.080 hanging out

00:08:53.740 with Pete Davidson

00:08:54.480 and not having fun?

00:08:56.980 Like,

00:08:57.340 you really can't

00:08:57.840 even conceive of it,

00:08:58.700 can you?

00:08:59.840 So,

00:09:00.420 I totally see

00:09:01.620 his appeal.

00:09:03.440 I don't think

00:09:04.500 people are going

00:09:06.020 to line up

00:09:06.820 to marry him

00:09:07.400 right away

00:09:07.840 for a lot

00:09:09.460 of the same reasons.

00:09:11.120 Rasmussen

00:09:11.540 has a poll

00:09:12.160 that Biden's

00:09:13.200 approval is

00:09:13.880 at 41%,

00:09:15.500 his disapproval

00:09:17.280 at 57%.

00:09:19.060 But here's the

00:09:20.400 weird thing.

00:09:21.560 57% disapprove

00:09:23.240 of him,

00:09:24.080 but yet 64%

00:09:25.320 say things

00:09:26.360 are heading

00:09:26.680 in the wrong

00:09:27.140 direction.

00:09:29.520 I don't know.

00:09:30.440 Maybe because

00:09:31.180 it's not his fault?

00:09:32.500 I would think

00:09:33.200 that his disapproval

00:09:34.160 would be closer

00:09:34.840 to the same

00:09:36.240 as the number

00:09:36.820 that say it's

00:09:37.400 heading in the

00:09:37.880 wrong direction.

00:09:38.780 It's in that

00:09:39.240 neighborhood,

00:09:39.880 but I'd expect

00:09:40.600 that to be closer.

00:09:42.640 Anyway,

00:09:43.040 where are all

00:09:46.100 the people

00:09:46.480 who thought

00:09:47.000 things would be

00:09:47.720 better under Trump?

00:09:50.060 Because I don't

00:09:50.800 think we got

00:09:51.320 that, right?

00:09:51.940 Or better under

00:09:52.560 Biden than Trump.

00:09:53.480 I don't think

00:09:53.840 we got that.

00:09:55.140 I wonder if

00:09:55.580 people are noticing.

00:09:57.600 So,

00:09:58.540 Brian Stilter

00:10:01.480 was pointing out

00:10:02.300 that the

00:10:03.280 January 6th

00:10:04.260 committee hearings

00:10:05.080 were apparently

00:10:06.620 being broadcast

00:10:07.240 by CNN,

00:10:08.420 but he points

00:10:09.260 out that it

00:10:10.180 wasn't being

00:10:10.820 carried by

00:10:11.400 Fox News,

00:10:13.360 Newsmax,

00:10:14.160 or One

00:10:14.560 America News,

00:10:15.720 all right-leaning

00:10:16.940 news outlets.

00:10:19.860 So,

00:10:20.160 what do you

00:10:20.360 think?

00:10:20.660 Does Stilter

00:10:21.720 have a point?

00:10:23.000 Because you've

00:10:23.420 seen it in the

00:10:23.860 other direction,

00:10:24.560 right?

00:10:25.780 You've seen the

00:10:26.520 other direction

00:10:27.100 where Fox News

00:10:28.860 would carry

00:10:29.260 something all day

00:10:29.940 long that

00:10:31.440 the CNN

00:10:32.800 would not.

00:10:33.800 You could

00:10:34.060 probably think

00:10:34.500 of some

00:10:34.940 examples of

00:10:36.000 that.

00:10:36.980 So,

00:10:37.360 does he have

00:10:37.720 a point?

00:10:38.060 Do you feel

00:10:40.120 like you're

00:10:40.520 being manipulated

00:10:41.360 by the right-leaning

00:10:43.600 media for not

00:10:45.080 showing you that?

00:10:45.820 Why don't

00:10:48.600 you care?

00:10:50.760 Why don't

00:10:51.300 you care?

00:10:53.840 Now,

00:10:54.300 I can see why

00:10:54.840 CNN wouldn't

00:10:55.500 cover the

00:10:55.880 Trump rallies

00:10:56.560 because those

00:10:57.060 are purely

00:10:57.520 political.

00:10:57.960 you don't

00:11:02.200 care.

00:11:03.260 Okay?

00:11:03.680 Here's my

00:11:04.340 speculation about

00:11:05.440 why the people

00:11:06.120 on the right

00:11:06.800 and therefore

00:11:07.620 the platforms

00:11:08.400 themselves don't

00:11:10.160 carry it.

00:11:10.660 see if this

00:11:11.580 rings true

00:11:12.160 with you

00:11:12.540 because everyone

00:11:14.920 on the right

00:11:15.620 knows it

00:11:16.820 wasn't an

00:11:17.360 insurrection.

00:11:19.160 So,

00:11:19.760 it's a

00:11:20.240 committee to

00:11:21.460 find out if

00:11:22.580 an insurrection

00:11:23.380 happened and

00:11:24.260 how it happened

00:11:24.900 and who was

00:11:25.340 behind it.

00:11:26.680 Everyone on

00:11:27.440 the right

00:11:27.800 knows it's

00:11:28.340 not real.

00:11:31.200 Everyone.

00:11:33.040 Everyone.

00:11:34.380 I think

00:11:34.740 everyone on

00:11:35.280 the right

00:11:35.540 knows there

00:11:35.960 was no

00:11:36.280 insurrection

00:11:36.720 and that no

00:11:37.660 one will be

00:11:38.160 charged with

00:11:38.700 one.

00:11:38.940 Now,

00:11:40.820 I realize

00:11:41.160 that insurrection

00:11:41.680 is difficult

00:11:42.580 to charge,

00:11:44.800 but there's

00:11:46.240 nobody even

00:11:46.700 close.

00:11:48.460 Is there?

00:11:49.440 They're being

00:11:49.980 charged with

00:11:50.600 individual crimes

00:11:51.580 which I think

00:11:52.640 in most cases

00:11:53.320 they did

00:11:53.800 commit.

00:11:55.000 So,

00:11:55.320 I don't,

00:11:55.720 and here's

00:11:56.300 the thing,

00:11:57.060 are any

00:11:58.440 conservatives

00:11:59.780 complaining

00:12:00.620 that the

00:12:02.280 protesters

00:12:02.840 who literally

00:12:03.680 broke a

00:12:04.320 law are

00:12:05.940 subject to

00:12:06.880 the legal

00:12:08.380 system?

00:12:08.940 I haven't

00:12:10.120 heard anybody

00:12:10.520 complain about

00:12:11.100 that.

00:12:11.700 We've

00:12:11.920 complained about

00:12:12.460 people being

00:12:13.060 jailed for

00:12:13.960 too long

00:12:14.580 without the

00:12:15.540 system,

00:12:16.600 you know,

00:12:17.000 dealing with

00:12:17.640 them one way

00:12:18.080 or another.

00:12:18.820 And that

00:12:19.120 looks criminal

00:12:19.880 to me.

00:12:21.100 But nobody's

00:12:21.760 complaining about

00:12:22.360 the fact that

00:12:23.000 there's a thing

00:12:23.640 called laws

00:12:24.360 that apply to

00:12:25.700 everybody.

00:12:28.460 All right,

00:12:28.980 that's my theory,

00:12:29.840 is that the

00:12:30.320 people on the

00:12:30.780 left need to

00:12:31.640 see it because

00:12:32.760 they could find

00:12:33.680 out what's going

00:12:34.360 on, but the

00:12:34.960 people on the

00:12:35.380 right already

00:12:36.220 know.

00:12:37.120 There's nothing

00:12:37.680 to find out.

00:12:38.920 Why would

00:12:39.340 you show an

00:12:39.940 entire hearing

00:12:41.600 of nothing?

00:12:43.280 That's what it

00:12:43.920 looks like on

00:12:44.340 the right.

00:12:45.180 Now, I'm

00:12:46.140 being too

00:12:46.560 kind because

00:12:47.480 obviously all

00:12:48.480 the news

00:12:48.840 organizations are

00:12:49.840 in some way

00:12:51.400 brainwashing

00:12:52.340 tools.

00:12:54.140 So if they

00:12:55.020 choose to not

00:12:56.020 show something

00:12:56.600 or show

00:12:57.020 something, that

00:12:58.460 is a statement

00:12:59.400 about brainwashing.

00:13:01.000 But in this

00:13:01.820 case, CNN is

00:13:02.620 doing the

00:13:03.020 brainwashing and

00:13:04.100 the other

00:13:05.320 entities already

00:13:06.900 said everything

00:13:07.420 they need to

00:13:07.940 say.

00:13:08.780 There's nothing

00:13:09.240 there except

00:13:10.500 individual crimes

00:13:11.500 which need to

00:13:12.100 be dealt

00:13:13.000 with.

00:13:14.540 All right,

00:13:14.860 here are some

00:13:15.220 examples of

00:13:15.940 recent mass

00:13:16.660 brainwashing

00:13:17.380 operations.

00:13:18.160 And by the

00:13:18.460 way, I think

00:13:19.640 we need to

00:13:20.120 get away from

00:13:21.040 our old words

00:13:23.300 about the

00:13:24.160 so-called news

00:13:25.000 networks and

00:13:26.320 social media

00:13:26.960 collectively.

00:13:27.800 They're not

00:13:28.460 really about

00:13:29.180 news anymore,

00:13:29.840 are they?

00:13:30.940 It would be,

00:13:32.100 I think it

00:13:32.520 would be more

00:13:32.980 accurate and

00:13:33.800 without

00:13:34.300 hyperbole.

00:13:36.180 I'm going to

00:13:36.880 try to be

00:13:37.460 just straightforward

00:13:39.260 on the facts

00:13:40.200 and not

00:13:40.800 exaggerate them.

00:13:41.680 It'll sound

00:13:42.140 like an

00:13:42.500 exaggeration,

00:13:43.880 but I'm not

00:13:44.340 trying to do

00:13:44.940 that.

00:13:45.180 I'm honestly

00:13:45.780 trying to not

00:13:46.480 exaggerate.

00:13:48.200 I think the

00:13:49.260 things we used

00:13:49.880 to call the

00:13:50.300 news are so

00:13:51.040 clearly now

00:13:51.980 just brainwashing

00:13:53.860 operations that

00:13:55.860 I have trouble

00:13:56.860 even considering

00:13:57.640 them as news

00:13:58.540 entities.

00:14:00.180 They just

00:14:00.600 look like a

00:14:02.200 brainwashing

00:14:02.780 operation going

00:14:03.800 in different

00:14:04.180 directions.

00:14:05.680 That's all it

00:14:06.140 looks like to

00:14:06.600 me.

00:14:07.560 Now there is

00:14:08.200 news there

00:14:08.860 which gives

00:14:09.340 them a reason

00:14:10.740 or a cover

00:14:11.280 story for

00:14:11.800 existing,

00:14:12.400 I guess.

00:14:13.240 But listen

00:14:13.840 to all these.

00:14:15.000 In my opinion,

00:14:16.240 these are

00:14:16.620 brainwashing

00:14:17.300 operations,

00:14:18.820 meaning that

00:14:19.400 somebody

00:14:19.860 intentionally

00:14:20.560 said,

00:14:21.680 let's convince

00:14:22.220 somebody of

00:14:22.940 something that's

00:14:23.640 not true,

00:14:24.920 as opposed to

00:14:26.120 just fake news

00:14:26.900 where it's just

00:14:27.680 not true.

00:14:28.500 But somebody

00:14:28.960 actually decided

00:14:30.100 specifically,

00:14:32.440 let's see if

00:14:32.920 we can sell

00:14:33.420 this not

00:14:34.020 true thing.

00:14:35.440 You had the

00:14:35.820 Russia collusion

00:14:36.580 hoax.

00:14:37.820 They knew

00:14:38.280 that wasn't

00:14:38.740 true.

00:14:40.020 Here's a new

00:14:40.740 one I'm adding

00:14:41.180 to my list.

00:14:42.280 Have you seen

00:14:42.740 the chart that

00:14:44.380 shows you that

00:14:45.100 at exactly the

00:14:45.980 same time,

00:14:46.620 Occupy Wall

00:14:47.400 Street disappeared

00:14:48.840 for no reason?

00:14:51.200 Because what

00:14:51.620 they were

00:14:51.880 complaining about

00:14:52.580 didn't stop.

00:14:53.480 It got worse.

00:14:54.840 The income

00:14:55.380 distribution got

00:14:56.220 worse, not

00:14:56.700 better.

00:14:56.920 But Occupy

00:14:58.020 Wall Street

00:14:58.360 just sort of

00:14:58.860 went away.

00:15:00.560 And then it

00:15:00.920 was replaced

00:15:01.480 with critical

00:15:02.180 race theory

00:15:02.800 and Black

00:15:03.280 Lives Matter

00:15:03.840 and race,

00:15:04.800 race, race,

00:15:05.280 everything's

00:15:05.680 race.

00:15:06.980 Okay?

00:15:08.340 That's not

00:15:09.000 natural.

00:15:10.460 That's a

00:15:11.060 brainwashing

00:15:11.620 operation.

00:15:13.000 Obviously,

00:15:13.640 somebody decided

00:15:14.700 Occupy Wall

00:15:15.520 Street didn't

00:15:16.060 work as a

00:15:17.080 frame, and so

00:15:18.380 they came up

00:15:18.900 with a new

00:15:19.260 frame.

00:15:19.540 I don't know

00:15:19.840 who they is.

00:15:21.180 You could guess

00:15:21.940 it's Soros.

00:15:22.800 I know you're

00:15:23.280 going to say

00:15:23.560 Soros. 0.78

00:15:23.940 I don't have

00:15:25.060 personal reason

00:15:26.540 to believe

00:15:26.960 he's the

00:15:27.340 one cause

00:15:28.500 of all

00:15:28.800 this stuff.

00:15:30.220 But clearly

00:15:31.640 there were

00:15:32.140 numbers of

00:15:32.760 people in

00:15:33.460 important places

00:15:34.480 that thought

00:15:35.060 that race

00:15:35.680 was going to

00:15:36.220 be the new

00:15:36.660 frame.

00:15:37.980 And so I

00:15:38.700 would call

00:15:38.980 that a

00:15:39.260 brainwashing

00:15:39.820 operation

00:15:40.240 because not

00:15:40.960 much changed.

00:15:43.060 Right?

00:15:43.540 From, you

00:15:44.620 know, from

00:15:45.060 two years

00:15:45.700 ago, I

00:15:47.040 don't know

00:15:47.300 that much

00:15:47.600 changed, but

00:15:48.380 suddenly it's

00:15:48.800 the biggest

00:15:49.140 topic in the

00:15:49.740 world.

00:15:50.260 So that

00:15:50.620 screams

00:15:51.140 brainwashing

00:15:52.200 operation.

00:15:53.960 You saw

00:15:54.560 the Waukesha

00:15:56.320 story disappear.

00:15:59.700 That's a

00:16:00.080 brainwashing

00:16:00.660 operation.

00:16:01.660 They just

00:16:01.960 make an

00:16:02.820 inconvenient

00:16:03.540 narrative

00:16:04.700 disappear.

00:16:06.420 Of course,

00:16:07.060 the fine

00:16:07.380 people hoax,

00:16:08.320 the drinking

00:16:08.740 bleach hoax,

00:16:09.580 were two

00:16:10.060 big brainwashing

00:16:11.100 operations.

00:16:12.320 They worked

00:16:12.800 on the left

00:16:13.360 and worked

00:16:13.940 a little bit

00:16:14.400 on the right,

00:16:15.000 amazingly.

00:16:16.340 And then the

00:16:17.120 thought that

00:16:18.200 the courts

00:16:19.200 have validated

00:16:19.960 the election.

00:16:21.860 That's a

00:16:22.500 brainwashing

00:16:23.040 operation.

00:16:23.480 I think

00:16:24.240 half of the

00:16:24.680 country thinks

00:16:25.280 that the

00:16:25.660 courts looked

00:16:26.280 at the

00:16:26.540 election and

00:16:27.100 decided it

00:16:27.660 was fair.

00:16:29.260 You know

00:16:29.640 nothing like

00:16:30.100 that happened,

00:16:30.660 right?

00:16:31.660 There were

00:16:32.180 just a few

00:16:32.960 cases brought

00:16:33.660 to the

00:16:33.980 courts, and

00:16:35.060 in the most

00:16:35.780 cases, most

00:16:36.780 of them they

00:16:37.940 didn't have

00:16:38.300 standing, or it

00:16:39.080 was too late,

00:16:40.000 or there was a

00:16:41.360 reason that the

00:16:42.000 court couldn't

00:16:42.460 look at it, or

00:16:43.580 it was too early

00:16:44.260 before anybody

00:16:45.020 had audited

00:16:45.420 anything.

00:16:46.180 But basically

00:16:46.860 the courts

00:16:47.380 looked at a

00:16:48.620 whole bunch

00:16:49.020 of nothing.

00:16:50.280 There was a

00:16:50.700 lot of it,

00:16:51.260 but all of

00:16:52.860 it added up

00:16:53.320 to nothing.

00:16:54.280 So they

00:16:54.800 can't prove

00:16:55.660 there was no

00:16:56.340 election problems,

00:16:57.840 they can only

00:16:58.300 prove they

00:16:58.720 didn't judge

00:16:59.880 that there

00:17:00.140 was any,

00:17:01.160 which is

00:17:01.560 different.

00:17:03.020 All right, so

00:17:03.340 those are just

00:17:03.720 some examples.

00:17:04.820 Yeah, I just

00:17:06.320 don't even see

00:17:06.900 the news

00:17:07.340 anymore as

00:17:07.980 even intending

00:17:09.420 to give you

00:17:09.940 news.

00:17:10.600 It looks like

00:17:11.580 the intention

00:17:12.820 is to

00:17:13.860 brainwash.

00:17:16.620 All right.

00:17:17.260 I was

00:17:19.880 talking to

00:17:21.820 a gentleman

00:17:22.460 online who

00:17:23.180 had been

00:17:23.460 brainwashed to

00:17:24.180 believe there

00:17:24.540 was an

00:17:24.940 insurrection,

00:17:25.840 and when I

00:17:26.280 said it was

00:17:27.760 a weird

00:17:28.060 insurrection

00:17:28.520 because the

00:17:29.760 most armed

00:17:30.540 segment of

00:17:31.420 American life

00:17:32.220 didn't bring

00:17:33.320 weapons, and

00:17:35.280 I was corrected

00:17:35.960 that there

00:17:36.740 were actually

00:17:37.300 six guns

00:17:38.900 were retrieved

00:17:40.280 from the

00:17:41.120 protesters.

00:17:41.700 We assume

00:17:42.100 there were

00:17:42.360 more, but

00:17:43.360 six were

00:17:44.100 discovered.

00:17:45.440 Do you know

00:17:45.900 how they

00:17:46.180 discovered them?

00:17:48.120 Well, it

00:17:48.720 wasn't because

00:17:49.220 anybody had

00:17:50.000 one out.

00:17:52.460 I think, you

00:17:54.040 know, they

00:17:54.220 were probably

00:17:54.580 arrested for

00:17:55.140 other reasons

00:17:55.780 or whatever

00:17:56.540 and have

00:17:56.880 guns, but

00:17:58.100 this was

00:17:59.260 given to me

00:17:59.900 as a reason

00:18:00.500 to believe it

00:18:01.800 was an

00:18:02.240 armed

00:18:02.620 insurrection,

00:18:03.540 that they

00:18:03.880 had found

00:18:04.200 six guns.

00:18:05.540 And I

00:18:05.840 pointed out

00:18:06.400 that six

00:18:07.220 guns is

00:18:08.000 roughly the

00:18:09.240 amount of

00:18:09.620 guns in a

00:18:10.340 Texas Walmart

00:18:11.220 on any

00:18:12.420 given moment.

00:18:14.360 Am I

00:18:15.100 wrong?

00:18:15.360 If you

00:18:16.480 go into a

00:18:17.100 Walmart in

00:18:17.720 Texas, do

00:18:19.400 you think

00:18:19.660 there are

00:18:19.920 six guns

00:18:20.440 in there?

00:18:22.040 I'll bet.

00:18:24.140 And then

00:18:24.740 how many are

00:18:25.160 in the

00:18:25.380 parking lot?

00:18:27.080 Six guns

00:18:27.820 in the

00:18:28.060 building, but

00:18:28.500 how many are

00:18:28.920 in the

00:18:29.240 parking lot?

00:18:31.060 Oh, a

00:18:31.820 hundred.

00:18:33.580 That's probably

00:18:34.260 every Walmart.

00:18:35.840 So, no, that

00:18:36.640 doesn't mean

00:18:37.020 anything that

00:18:37.500 there were

00:18:37.740 six guns in

00:18:38.760 a gigantic

00:18:39.980 gathering of

00:18:40.980 conservatives.

00:18:41.540 conservatives

00:18:42.680 bring guns

00:18:43.500 in case they

00:18:44.800 need them.

00:18:45.680 It's just

00:18:46.100 standard procedure

00:18:46.920 for a lot

00:18:47.400 of people.

00:18:51.260 True or

00:18:52.040 false, the

00:18:53.900 public needs

00:18:54.640 an advocate

00:18:55.400 for getting

00:18:56.600 us out of

00:18:57.560 the pandemic

00:18:58.720 constraints.

00:19:02.420 The public

00:19:03.280 needs an

00:19:03.740 advocate.

00:19:04.940 What we

00:19:05.340 have are

00:19:05.880 elected

00:19:06.260 representatives.

00:19:08.140 They're the

00:19:08.920 wrong people.

00:19:10.200 not by

00:19:11.640 personality

00:19:12.180 and not

00:19:12.640 by competence.

00:19:15.380 The problem

00:19:15.960 here is that

00:19:16.500 the public,

00:19:17.880 and this is

00:19:18.480 a rare

00:19:18.800 situation,

00:19:20.140 where the

00:19:20.520 public's

00:19:20.980 interest is

00:19:21.560 just not

00:19:21.980 the same

00:19:22.480 as the

00:19:22.800 government's

00:19:23.260 interest.

00:19:24.620 Normally,

00:19:25.280 they're really

00:19:25.660 in lock

00:19:26.080 step.

00:19:27.200 Normally,

00:19:27.680 the government

00:19:28.040 has to do

00:19:28.620 a good job

00:19:29.320 for the

00:19:29.720 people in

00:19:30.740 a way that

00:19:31.140 the people

00:19:31.480 can observe

00:19:32.260 and see,

00:19:33.500 and that

00:19:33.880 will help

00:19:34.240 them get

00:19:34.580 elected and

00:19:35.380 would be

00:19:35.840 good for

00:19:36.120 the politicians.

00:19:37.220 So, we've

00:19:37.700 designed a

00:19:38.280 really good

00:19:38.740 system.

00:19:39.160 You know,

00:19:40.320 compared to

00:19:40.840 the alternatives.

00:19:42.100 The republic

00:19:42.780 or democratic

00:19:44.360 processes within

00:19:45.480 is really

00:19:46.680 good.

00:19:47.480 Really good.

00:19:49.360 You know,

00:19:49.780 with laws,

00:19:50.600 of course,

00:19:51.140 but the best

00:19:52.160 we have.

00:19:53.400 But here's

00:19:54.560 the problem.

00:19:55.840 The government

00:19:56.520 has to manage

00:19:57.940 for minimum

00:19:58.820 death.

00:20:00.120 What does

00:20:00.900 everybody say

00:20:01.540 is the number

00:20:02.180 one job

00:20:02.940 of a government?

00:20:04.680 Protect the

00:20:05.780 citizens.

00:20:07.060 Am I right?

00:20:07.520 Everybody

00:20:08.560 would agree

00:20:09.020 with that.

00:20:09.800 The number

00:20:10.140 one job

00:20:10.720 of government

00:20:11.340 is to

00:20:12.520 protect

00:20:13.060 the citizens.

00:20:15.720 Somebody

00:20:16.200 says it's

00:20:16.680 not.

00:20:18.040 Really?

00:20:19.100 You would

00:20:19.440 disagree with

00:20:19.920 that statement?

00:20:20.860 I'm saying

00:20:21.300 that's the,

00:20:22.900 if you listen

00:20:23.960 to any

00:20:24.380 politician,

00:20:25.640 they will

00:20:26.020 tell you

00:20:26.320 that.

00:20:27.260 That their

00:20:27.900 job is to

00:20:28.680 protect people.

00:20:30.220 Now,

00:20:30.640 that doesn't

00:20:31.020 mean take

00:20:31.380 their freedom

00:20:31.840 away.

00:20:33.300 Right?

00:20:33.740 That means

00:20:35.100 protect them.

00:20:36.260 Make sure

00:20:36.560 you've got

00:20:37.000 law enforcement.

00:20:37.940 Make sure

00:20:38.160 you have

00:20:38.400 a national

00:20:38.800 defense.

00:20:40.180 Make sure,

00:20:41.020 you know,

00:20:41.500 maybe OSHA

00:20:42.320 and stuff.

00:20:42.880 Make sure

00:20:43.220 that you're

00:20:43.620 not doing

00:20:44.080 obviously

00:20:44.620 dangerous

00:20:45.120 things that

00:20:45.880 are just

00:20:46.160 ridiculous.

00:20:47.500 Now,

00:20:47.940 of course,

00:20:48.340 they might

00:20:48.600 go too

00:20:48.980 far,

00:20:49.380 and that's

00:20:49.660 another

00:20:49.900 conversation.

00:20:51.280 You know,

00:20:51.540 go too

00:20:51.880 far in

00:20:52.180 trying to

00:20:52.460 keep you

00:20:52.760 safe.

00:20:53.020 And I

00:20:53.740 think that's

00:20:54.160 our exact

00:20:54.640 situation

00:20:55.200 here.

00:20:56.560 What the

00:20:57.140 public wants

00:20:58.040 is an

00:20:59.740 objective

00:21:00.380 risk management

00:21:01.640 decision based

00:21:03.340 on the

00:21:03.660 best

00:21:03.900 information.

00:21:05.440 And for

00:21:05.800 most of

00:21:06.280 us,

00:21:06.540 that would

00:21:06.760 indicate

00:21:07.100 opening up

00:21:07.920 sooner than

00:21:09.560 the government

00:21:10.180 wants.

00:21:11.280 Am I right?

00:21:12.320 That the

00:21:12.700 public,

00:21:13.920 not everybody,

00:21:15.000 but the

00:21:15.240 public,

00:21:16.140 I'd say the

00:21:16.900 consensus is

00:21:17.880 clearly on the

00:21:18.720 side of

00:21:19.240 opening up

00:21:20.400 sooner than

00:21:20.940 later.

00:21:21.820 Would you

00:21:22.220 agree with

00:21:22.580 that?

00:21:23.300 I could be

00:21:23.700 wrong about

00:21:24.140 that, but

00:21:24.500 I think

00:21:24.740 that's true.

00:21:26.260 I see

00:21:26.560 one wrong.

00:21:29.360 But if

00:21:31.120 the public

00:21:31.580 were sure

00:21:32.420 that

00:21:32.860 they were

00:21:33.760 safe enough,

00:21:34.700 I'm pretty

00:21:35.140 sure that

00:21:35.540 they'd all

00:21:35.880 be on

00:21:36.460 that side.

00:21:37.660 Now,

00:21:37.980 here's the

00:21:38.300 problem.

00:21:39.400 You've got

00:21:39.780 a government

00:21:40.260 who has to

00:21:40.840 manage toward

00:21:41.800 minimizing

00:21:42.800 death, but

00:21:44.260 you've got a

00:21:44.740 public who

00:21:45.640 doesn't have

00:21:46.140 that same

00:21:46.860 single-minded

00:21:48.560 focus.

00:21:49.800 The public

00:21:50.260 wants to

00:21:50.760 live a life

00:21:51.400 that they

00:21:51.760 know has a

00:21:52.340 certain amount

00:21:52.740 of risks,

00:21:53.660 and once

00:21:54.160 they've been

00:21:54.520 informed,

00:21:55.600 and once

00:21:56.040 they've been

00:21:56.340 given some

00:21:56.940 reasonable tools

00:21:57.940 to deal with

00:21:58.480 the risk,

00:21:58.960 which we

00:21:59.300 have now,

00:21:59.740 the public

00:22:01.560 just doesn't

00:22:02.920 have the

00:22:03.200 same

00:22:03.420 objective.

00:22:04.620 Our

00:22:04.880 objective is

00:22:05.520 to get

00:22:05.780 out there

00:22:06.100 and live,

00:22:07.220 take some

00:22:07.660 chances.

00:22:08.940 The government's

00:22:09.620 objective is

00:22:10.220 to minimize

00:22:10.600 death.

00:22:11.160 They're just

00:22:11.380 not compatible.

00:22:13.320 And so I

00:22:13.980 submit to you

00:22:14.660 that the

00:22:15.080 public needs

00:22:15.740 an advocate,

00:22:17.580 actually somebody

00:22:18.540 whose job it

00:22:19.320 is, I don't

00:22:20.600 know how they

00:22:21.040 would ever be

00:22:21.640 appointed or

00:22:23.340 self-appointed

00:22:24.300 or something,

00:22:25.940 so that

00:22:26.700 somebody can

00:22:27.460 negotiate directly

00:22:28.820 with the

00:22:29.200 government,

00:22:30.200 because the

00:22:30.760 government are

00:22:31.300 not our

00:22:31.800 representatives on

00:22:32.940 this specific

00:22:33.700 question.

00:22:34.960 The government

00:22:35.440 are our

00:22:36.020 representatives on

00:22:36.960 basically everything

00:22:38.300 else.

00:22:39.260 It's just a weird

00:22:39.940 situation where

00:22:41.360 we should not

00:22:42.740 expect that they

00:22:44.720 would represent

00:22:45.300 us, because

00:22:47.420 they have

00:22:48.620 different objectives.

00:22:50.260 Now, that's

00:22:50.640 not their fault,

00:22:51.800 is it?

00:22:53.280 People manage

00:22:54.700 to their

00:22:55.060 incentives.

00:22:56.800 You can't

00:22:57.360 change that.

00:22:57.880 People manage

00:22:59.240 to their

00:23:01.000 own risk

00:23:01.740 management.

00:23:02.920 And the

00:23:03.180 politicians have

00:23:04.040 to manage for

00:23:04.740 the minimizing

00:23:06.000 death, and the

00:23:07.700 public doesn't.

00:23:09.300 So we need an

00:23:10.260 advocate.

00:23:11.680 Now, I don't

00:23:13.800 know I would be

00:23:14.340 the right choice

00:23:14.900 for that, but

00:23:15.840 there should be

00:23:16.420 somebody who at

00:23:17.440 least has something

00:23:19.040 like my skill

00:23:19.900 set, maybe more

00:23:21.400 credibility in a

00:23:22.600 variety of ways,

00:23:23.880 but something like

00:23:24.740 that.

00:23:25.700 We just need

00:23:26.240 somebody to speak

00:23:26.940 for the people,

00:23:27.620 because the

00:23:28.020 government can't

00:23:28.680 do that right

00:23:29.140 now.

00:23:30.720 All right.

00:23:32.580 There's a new

00:23:33.280 technology that

00:23:34.740 looks promising

00:23:35.680 that will allow

00:23:37.620 you to get a

00:23:38.120 vaccination without 0.74

00:23:39.020 a needle.

00:23:40.340 So there's a

00:23:41.180 little device that

00:23:42.360 blows focused

00:23:43.700 air into your

00:23:45.500 arm or whatever,

00:23:47.200 and somehow that

00:23:48.840 air can inject

00:23:50.380 enough of the

00:23:51.380 vaccination that

00:23:53.140 you don't need an

00:23:53.740 actual needle.

00:23:55.880 And as others

00:23:57.580 have observed,

00:23:59.640 we humans are

00:24:01.380 rationalizers, we're

00:24:02.720 not really rational

00:24:03.580 people.

00:24:04.600 And I do suspect

00:24:05.460 that, I'm just

00:24:07.480 going to throw a

00:24:08.480 wild-ass number

00:24:09.340 out, this has no

00:24:10.440 data or anything,

00:24:11.360 it's just based on

00:24:12.100 living in the

00:24:13.360 world.

00:24:14.020 I would bet

00:24:14.920 you, I will bet

00:24:16.940 you that of the

00:24:18.080 vaccine resistors,

00:24:20.080 25% of them are,

00:24:22.260 it's about the

00:24:22.920 needle.

00:24:23.960 They won't say

00:24:24.840 that necessarily.

00:24:26.160 They might make

00:24:26.740 an argument for

00:24:27.520 risk management,

00:24:28.720 et cetera.

00:24:29.420 But I feel like

00:24:30.080 at least 25%

00:24:31.600 have a needle

00:24:33.340 fear that has

00:24:34.480 influenced them to

00:24:35.420 think they have

00:24:35.980 some other reason.

00:24:37.420 That would be

00:24:37.920 normal, by the

00:24:38.780 way.

00:24:39.600 That would just

00:24:40.080 be how a normal

00:24:41.160 brain would work.

00:24:42.240 You would

00:24:42.720 rationalize that

00:24:43.440 stuff and make

00:24:44.480 it think that

00:24:45.000 you're making a

00:24:45.660 rational decision.

00:24:48.040 Air bubbles and

00:24:48.800 veins, I don't

00:24:49.420 know, I guess they

00:24:50.020 figured that out

00:24:50.640 somehow.

00:24:50.940 It's not like

00:24:52.680 they're shooting

00:24:53.120 into a vein.

00:24:54.260 It looks like

00:24:54.660 they're shooting

00:24:55.100 into your skin

00:24:56.580 somehow.

00:25:00.580 That's way too

00:25:01.320 high, Scott.

00:25:02.140 What would you

00:25:02.720 say, 10%?

00:25:04.100 10% maybe just

00:25:06.140 have fear of

00:25:06.660 needles.

00:25:07.160 Fear of needles

00:25:07.860 is a big thing.

00:25:10.380 Somebody says

00:25:10.900 2%?

00:25:11.720 Maybe.

00:25:12.800 I don't know.

00:25:13.400 But for some

00:25:14.020 people who

00:25:14.500 actually maybe

00:25:15.400 would want the

00:25:16.420 vaccination but

00:25:17.580 are afraid of the

00:25:19.180 needles, that might 0.96

00:25:19.780 make a difference

00:25:20.340 to them.

00:25:21.120 Again, I'm not

00:25:21.980 recommending you

00:25:22.700 get vaccinated.

00:25:24.360 Let me say that

00:25:25.240 as often as I

00:25:25.980 need to.

00:25:27.080 I'll give you the

00:25:27.880 pros and cons as

00:25:29.340 they develop.

00:25:30.980 So this is on

00:25:31.640 the pro side.

00:25:33.920 But it doesn't

00:25:34.540 mean you should

00:25:34.880 do it.

00:25:36.580 It just means

00:25:37.360 that there's lots

00:25:37.880 of pros and

00:25:38.380 cons and maybe

00:25:39.660 you should be

00:25:40.040 aware of them

00:25:40.460 all and then

00:25:41.420 make your own

00:25:41.960 decision.

00:25:45.960 All right.

00:25:47.920 Let's see what

00:25:48.520 else is going

00:25:48.980 on.

00:25:49.800 Here's the

00:25:50.380 name of that

00:25:50.840 company that's

00:25:51.360 making that air

00:25:53.300 vaccination thing

00:25:54.480 that just blows

00:25:55.200 air into you.

00:25:56.440 It's Diosynvax.

00:25:59.260 D-I-O-S-Y-N 1.00

00:26:01.900 like synthetic

00:26:03.360 vax.

00:26:05.440 And let me

00:26:06.620 give you some

00:26:07.200 advice.

00:26:08.420 I'm going to

00:26:09.000 give some

00:26:09.320 corporate advice

00:26:10.120 here to this

00:26:11.520 company.

00:26:12.860 So you can

00:26:13.640 just watch.

00:26:14.240 but this is

00:26:16.160 intended for

00:26:17.480 the CEO

00:26:18.340 of Diosynvax.

00:26:21.880 If you're

00:26:22.520 trying to make

00:26:23.100 a device to

00:26:24.840 get the people

00:26:26.560 who don't want

00:26:27.360 vaccinations,

00:26:29.480 a lot of them

00:26:30.520 would be

00:26:30.840 Christian.

00:26:32.180 You don't

00:26:32.860 want to name

00:26:33.560 your company

00:26:34.280 Diosynvax.

00:26:38.820 Because dying

00:26:39.700 is bad, sin

00:26:40.480 is bad, and

00:26:41.400 some people are

00:26:42.760 already anti-vax.

00:26:44.240 So Diosynvax

00:26:45.940 looks like

00:26:47.440 I hope they

00:26:49.380 didn't pay a

00:26:50.200 consultant for

00:26:50.840 that name.

00:26:51.940 You know,

00:26:52.120 there's sometimes

00:26:52.540 a consultant

00:26:53.160 will do that.

00:26:54.380 They should

00:26:54.960 pay a cartoonist

00:26:55.920 to check out

00:26:57.800 company names.

00:26:59.240 Because you know

00:26:59.740 what cartoonists

00:27:00.500 do really well?

00:27:02.680 Mock things.

00:27:05.320 We're really

00:27:06.020 good at that.

00:27:07.060 A lot of

00:27:07.500 practice.

00:27:08.680 So show me

00:27:09.480 your corporate

00:27:09.960 name and I

00:27:10.560 will tell you

00:27:11.020 exactly how I

00:27:11.940 will mock it.

00:27:12.760 And Diosynvax,

00:27:16.100 that's just

00:27:17.360 asking for it.

00:27:19.080 How many of

00:27:20.040 you believe

00:27:20.680 that Pfizer's

00:27:22.240 documents,

00:27:22.940 their own

00:27:23.420 documents,

00:27:24.640 show vastly

00:27:25.600 more vaccine-related

00:27:27.940 deaths than

00:27:29.980 you have been

00:27:30.580 told publicly?

00:27:32.320 How many of

00:27:33.360 you believe

00:27:33.960 that that's

00:27:34.580 in the news

00:27:35.820 and that

00:27:36.220 that's real?

00:27:38.440 That it's

00:27:39.120 actually just

00:27:39.700 news?

00:27:40.360 not a rumor,

00:27:42.220 but it's just

00:27:42.620 news.

00:27:43.760 How many of you

00:27:44.560 think it's a fact

00:27:45.500 that we now

00:27:46.900 know that

00:27:47.780 Pfizer's own

00:27:48.540 data shows

00:27:49.800 that vaccinations

00:27:50.700 are killing

00:27:52.260 way more

00:27:53.120 people than

00:27:54.800 had been

00:27:56.580 reported before?

00:27:57.420 How many

00:27:57.640 think that's

00:27:58.080 a fact?

00:27:58.560 jet air

00:28:01.340 injectors for

00:28:02.400 vaccines have

00:28:03.100 been around

00:28:03.540 since at

00:28:04.000 least the

00:28:04.340 50s,

00:28:05.000 Michael says.

00:28:06.720 Huh.

00:28:08.200 All right.

00:28:10.580 Well, here's

00:28:11.500 what Andres

00:28:12.440 Backhouse points

00:28:13.420 out, and I

00:28:14.480 always refer to

00:28:15.240 him as my

00:28:16.020 best source of

00:28:18.300 analyzing what

00:28:19.740 is and isn't

00:28:20.720 credible when it

00:28:21.680 comes to data.

00:28:23.000 He's really,

00:28:23.940 really good at it,

00:28:24.780 so that's why you

00:28:25.600 should follow

00:28:26.020 him, Andres

00:28:27.240 Backhouse.

00:28:29.080 And he took

00:28:31.240 a run at

00:28:31.660 Jordan Peterson

00:28:32.300 because Jordan

00:28:33.420 Peterson tweeted

00:28:35.340 that information

00:28:36.820 about all of

00:28:37.760 the deaths

00:28:38.740 with the

00:28:39.200 Pfizer vaccine,

00:28:41.000 according to

00:28:41.480 Pfizer's own

00:28:42.400 data.

00:28:43.560 But as Andres

00:28:44.720 points out,

00:28:45.880 that if you

00:28:46.440 actually read

00:28:47.320 the details of

00:28:48.760 it, it says

00:28:50.020 very clearly

00:28:50.660 that the deaths

00:28:51.440 are not

00:28:52.000 attributed to

00:28:53.120 the vaccination.

00:28:53.820 that's a

00:28:56.160 pretty big

00:28:56.480 difference.

00:28:57.840 Yes, there

00:28:58.240 were a lot

00:28:58.640 of deaths

00:28:59.180 because lots

00:29:02.740 and lots of

00:29:03.160 people got the

00:29:03.660 vaccination, and

00:29:05.240 there were a

00:29:05.560 lot of deaths,

00:29:07.100 but a huge

00:29:08.300 number of them

00:29:08.980 actually had

00:29:09.560 COVID at the

00:29:10.220 same time they

00:29:10.760 died.

00:29:11.860 They got the

00:29:12.420 vaccination, but

00:29:14.460 also got COVID,

00:29:15.720 either it was

00:29:16.300 after the first

00:29:17.940 vaccination or the

00:29:18.740 second.

00:29:19.440 So at the

00:29:20.260 very least, you

00:29:20.940 would have to

00:29:21.440 put a question

00:29:22.280 mark next to

00:29:22.940 the people who

00:29:23.400 died with

00:29:24.600 COVID, because

00:29:27.060 we know that

00:29:27.600 kills you. 0.95

00:29:28.800 How do you

00:29:29.140 know it was

00:29:29.440 the COVID and

00:29:30.060 not the

00:29:30.340 vaccination, or

00:29:31.400 the vaccinations

00:29:32.040 and not the

00:29:32.520 COVID?

00:29:33.220 We don't,

00:29:34.520 right?

00:29:35.300 So the point

00:29:36.100 is that these

00:29:37.320 big numbers are

00:29:38.080 simply the people

00:29:38.820 we know died.

00:29:40.360 It's not the

00:29:40.920 people we know

00:29:41.420 died because of

00:29:42.640 the vaccination.

00:29:44.420 If a lot of

00:29:45.140 them actually had

00:29:45.900 COVID, that's

00:29:47.740 pretty

00:29:48.640 questionable.

00:29:50.360 Now, am I

00:29:52.500 telling you that

00:29:53.120 these vaccinations

00:29:53.900 are safe?

00:29:54.720 No.

00:29:55.820 No.

00:29:56.940 Don't hear that.

00:29:58.420 Remember, this is

00:29:59.180 not the show that

00:29:59.980 goes binary.

00:30:01.500 Things are not

00:30:02.020 all good or

00:30:03.020 all bad.

00:30:04.300 Sometimes things

00:30:05.100 can be a little

00:30:05.800 good and a little

00:30:06.360 bit bad.

00:30:07.500 That's the theme

00:30:08.580 of this live

00:30:09.860 stream anyway.

00:30:11.260 And you

00:30:12.760 should not

00:30:13.380 believe that

00:30:14.300 these numbers

00:30:14.960 display an

00:30:16.900 actual number

00:30:17.600 of deaths.

00:30:18.040 deaths.

00:30:19.140 It could

00:30:19.840 be, but

00:30:21.220 it's unlikely.

00:30:22.940 It's unlikely.

00:30:24.980 It's very

00:30:25.680 unlikely, like

00:30:26.500 deeply unlikely.

00:30:28.020 As in, if you

00:30:29.300 had to bet your

00:30:29.860 own money against

00:30:30.580 it, you should

00:30:31.020 definitely bet

00:30:31.640 against it.

00:30:33.580 So, who

00:30:35.080 knows?

00:30:36.300 Who knows?

00:30:37.120 But don't

00:30:37.620 believe that this

00:30:38.280 data has been

00:30:38.960 proven in some

00:30:39.780 kind of a fact

00:30:40.500 and that the

00:30:41.160 numbers are

00:30:41.600 giant.

00:30:42.260 That's just

00:30:42.700 not the case.

00:30:43.760 All right.

00:30:45.320 Let's talk

00:30:46.040 about Dr.

00:30:46.900 Peter McCullough.

00:30:48.340 Who was on

00:30:49.720 Joe Rogan's

00:30:50.320 show.

00:30:50.720 I think he's

00:30:51.020 been on Fox.

00:30:51.960 He's been on

00:30:52.340 Laura Ingraham's

00:30:52.960 show.

00:30:53.880 And he's one of

00:30:55.080 the doctors who

00:30:55.800 has a, let's

00:30:56.560 say, a

00:30:56.800 contrarian view

00:30:57.800 about some

00:30:59.580 pandemic-y,

00:31:00.680 vaccination-y

00:31:01.420 stuff.

00:31:03.820 How many of

00:31:04.660 you are familiar

00:31:05.300 with Dr.

00:31:06.380 McCullough and

00:31:08.200 would find him

00:31:09.480 a credible

00:31:10.360 voice?

00:31:11.580 Go.

00:31:13.180 How many

00:31:13.860 find him

00:31:14.340 credible and

00:31:15.820 are familiar

00:31:16.280 with him?

00:31:16.660 On the

00:31:18.000 locals, we're

00:31:18.800 seeing just a

00:31:19.580 wall of

00:31:20.140 yeses.

00:31:21.460 One maybe,

00:31:22.220 don't know.

00:31:23.580 But yes,

00:31:24.120 yes, yes,

00:31:24.620 very credible.

00:31:26.140 Over on

00:31:27.160 YouTube, I'm

00:31:28.860 seeing yes,

00:31:29.620 yes, yes,

00:31:30.340 yes, yes,

00:31:30.780 yes, yes.

00:31:31.620 One no.

00:31:33.640 Talk to your

00:31:34.280 individual doctor,

00:31:35.340 good advice.

00:31:37.040 I mean, how do

00:31:38.260 you know your

00:31:38.640 individual doctor is

00:31:39.540 the smart one?

00:31:41.260 Very.

00:31:41.760 All right.

00:31:42.220 So almost

00:31:43.100 universally, you

00:31:43.960 would consider

00:31:44.420 him credible.

00:31:46.160 All right.

00:31:47.680 Good.

00:31:49.200 Excellent.

00:31:50.760 I was hoping

00:31:51.520 you'd say that.

00:31:53.000 Because here is

00:31:53.980 the part where

00:31:55.300 things get

00:31:55.820 interesting.

00:31:57.100 Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

00:32:01.220 Okay.

00:32:02.820 Here's my opinion

00:32:03.920 about his

00:32:05.060 credibility.

00:32:05.680 I don't know.

00:32:09.000 I don't know.

00:32:09.460 How would I

00:32:10.440 know?

00:32:11.940 Like, if he

00:32:12.840 says a bunch of

00:32:13.460 doctory, smart

00:32:14.600 sounding things,

00:32:15.380 how would I

00:32:15.720 know if it's

00:32:16.140 true?

00:32:17.780 No, I have

00:32:18.380 no way to

00:32:18.780 know.

00:32:19.860 I could check

00:32:20.700 his facts, as

00:32:21.460 people said,

00:32:22.420 but what have

00:32:23.160 I told you

00:32:23.580 about doing

00:32:24.340 your own

00:32:24.680 research?

00:32:26.220 Does that

00:32:26.760 work?

00:32:27.720 I've never

00:32:28.300 seen it work.

00:32:29.420 It never

00:32:29.820 works.

00:32:30.580 Do you know

00:32:30.940 when it works?

00:32:32.400 I'll tell you

00:32:32.900 when do your

00:32:33.540 own research

00:32:34.160 works.

00:32:34.700 It's a very

00:32:35.100 limited, very

00:32:36.660 limited situation.

00:32:37.620 doing your

00:32:39.480 own research

00:32:40.020 works if

00:32:41.120 your name

00:32:41.540 is Andres

00:32:42.700 Backhaus and

00:32:43.420 you have a

00:32:43.740 PhD in

00:32:44.320 economics.

00:32:47.000 If that's

00:32:47.740 the case

00:32:48.160 for you,

00:32:49.600 do your

00:32:50.060 own research.

00:32:50.780 Probably

00:32:51.040 tell you

00:32:51.380 something you

00:32:51.820 didn't know.

00:32:53.100 But for the

00:32:53.840 rest of us,

00:32:54.480 and I include

00:32:54.960 myself in

00:32:55.540 this category,

00:32:56.720 no, we

00:32:57.380 can't do

00:32:57.680 our own

00:32:58.000 research.

00:32:59.200 That's

00:32:59.640 ridiculous.

00:33:00.680 We'll just

00:33:01.120 confuse

00:33:01.520 ourselves.

00:33:02.540 We'll just

00:33:03.080 find the

00:33:03.480 things that

00:33:03.840 agree with

00:33:04.280 us and

00:33:04.660 come out of

00:33:05.660 the well

00:33:06.320 thinking we

00:33:06.900 proved it.

00:33:07.900 It's just a

00:33:08.660 confirmation

00:33:09.040 bias thing.

00:33:11.580 So many

00:33:11.940 of you

00:33:12.220 said,

00:33:12.680 Scott,

00:33:12.980 Scott,

00:33:13.240 Scott,

00:33:13.820 you are

00:33:14.520 showing some

00:33:15.680 doubt about

00:33:17.140 this doctor,

00:33:18.160 but you

00:33:19.280 didn't do

00:33:19.640 your own

00:33:19.960 research,

00:33:20.500 and you

00:33:20.800 didn't even

00:33:21.220 listen to

00:33:21.720 him.

00:33:22.940 And both

00:33:23.600 of those

00:33:23.920 things are

00:33:24.260 true.

00:33:25.060 I listened

00:33:25.520 to clips,

00:33:26.240 but I

00:33:26.460 didn't listen

00:33:26.840 to his

00:33:27.140 whole thing.

00:33:28.440 So can

00:33:28.940 I be

00:33:29.260 confident

00:33:29.740 about his

00:33:31.600 credibility if

00:33:32.460 I haven't

00:33:32.880 listened to

00:33:33.280 his whole

00:33:33.620 thing?

00:33:34.160 I've only

00:33:34.660 listened to

00:33:35.060 a little

00:33:35.300 bit.

00:33:35.520 And I'm

00:33:38.300 not an

00:33:38.580 expert.

00:33:39.200 And I

00:33:39.500 haven't done

00:33:39.900 my own

00:33:40.200 research.

00:33:42.280 How confident

00:33:43.440 can I be

00:33:44.100 in my

00:33:44.840 opinion?

00:33:45.940 What do

00:33:46.260 you think?

00:33:47.520 Well,

00:33:48.200 let me poke

00:33:50.440 at it from a

00:33:51.160 few different

00:33:52.260 angles and

00:33:53.400 find out which

00:33:54.840 parts of this

00:33:55.480 you would

00:33:55.760 disagree with.

00:33:56.380 number one.

00:33:59.620 This is what

00:34:00.340 I call a 0.88

00:34:00.940 category

00:34:01.440 problem.

00:34:03.620 If you

00:34:04.160 tried to

00:34:04.540 figure out

00:34:04.900 what's true

00:34:05.440 or not,

00:34:06.060 the first

00:34:06.620 thing I

00:34:06.980 do is

00:34:07.420 say,

00:34:07.680 what category

00:34:08.380 is it?

00:34:09.440 I'll give

00:34:09.780 you an 0.64

00:34:09.980 example.

00:34:11.300 Your

00:34:11.540 neighbor

00:34:11.840 says he

00:34:13.280 saw a

00:34:13.880 UFO and

00:34:15.260 it abducted

00:34:16.000 his family

00:34:16.500 and took

00:34:16.960 him away

00:34:17.340 and then

00:34:17.740 returned

00:34:18.100 them intact

00:34:18.760 the next

00:34:19.220 day.

00:34:19.480 That's a

00:34:21.240 category that

00:34:22.780 you can

00:34:23.120 reasonably

00:34:23.580 assume most

00:34:25.220 of the

00:34:25.420 things in

00:34:25.820 it are not

00:34:26.240 true.

00:34:27.600 Does it

00:34:28.100 mean that

00:34:28.900 your neighbor

00:34:29.300 was not

00:34:30.000 abducted by

00:34:31.060 an alien?

00:34:31.740 Nope.

00:34:32.680 Nope.

00:34:33.440 Does not 0.92

00:34:33.960 mean that.

00:34:35.040 This might

00:34:35.520 be the one

00:34:35.980 time it's

00:34:36.380 true.

00:34:38.440 But your

00:34:39.760 starting point

00:34:40.740 if you hear

00:34:41.700 somebody was

00:34:42.280 abducted by

00:34:42.920 an alien is

00:34:43.640 I'm going

00:34:45.080 to say 95%

00:34:46.360 chance that

00:34:47.020 didn't happen.

00:34:48.420 How often

00:34:49.220 would you

00:34:49.560 be right

00:34:50.060 if you

00:34:51.280 just went

00:34:51.660 into it

00:34:52.020 with a

00:34:52.320 95%

00:34:53.620 chance that

00:34:54.200 did not

00:34:54.620 happen?

00:34:55.480 Well so

00:34:55.940 far you'd

00:34:56.340 be right

00:34:56.680 every time.

00:34:58.080 Every time.

00:34:59.960 How about

00:35:00.700 if you

00:35:01.220 heard that

00:35:01.580 your neighbor

00:35:02.140 had built

00:35:03.880 a fusion

00:35:05.280 reactor in

00:35:06.780 his garage

00:35:07.700 which is

00:35:08.980 by the way

00:35:09.580 actually things

00:35:10.340 that have

00:35:10.600 happened.

00:35:11.380 I think

00:35:11.600 somebody

00:35:11.900 actually did

00:35:12.400 build a

00:35:12.800 I think

00:35:13.680 more than

00:35:14.140 once

00:35:14.560 somebody

00:35:15.580 thinks they

00:35:16.280 built a

00:35:16.860 fusion reactor

00:35:17.920 in their

00:35:18.280 garage.

00:35:19.220 that category

00:35:21.240 how often

00:35:22.580 is that

00:35:22.940 category

00:35:23.680 turning out

00:35:24.460 to be

00:35:24.740 true?

00:35:25.200 Well zero

00:35:25.740 so far

00:35:26.460 but there

00:35:28.420 might actually

00:35:29.160 someday be

00:35:30.100 somebody who

00:35:30.700 made a

00:35:31.000 fusion reactor

00:35:31.680 in their

00:35:32.000 garage.

00:35:33.420 Could happen.

00:35:34.820 How about

00:35:35.120 the inventor

00:35:36.260 who invented

00:35:37.000 a cure

00:35:38.640 for cancer

00:35:39.200 and it's

00:35:41.260 going to

00:35:41.700 trial and

00:35:42.800 man does it

00:35:43.440 look good.

00:35:44.360 It worked

00:35:44.800 on the

00:35:45.060 animals,

00:35:45.620 it worked

00:35:45.880 on the

00:35:46.160 test do.

00:35:46.580 it's

00:35:47.200 going to

00:35:47.460 cure

00:35:47.760 most

00:35:48.620 cancers.

00:35:50.780 That's a

00:35:51.560 category.

00:35:53.360 How often

00:35:53.940 does an

00:35:54.680 individual

00:35:55.240 claim in

00:35:57.000 the cancer

00:35:57.600 curing

00:35:58.160 category

00:35:58.700 turn out

00:35:59.200 to be

00:35:59.520 true?

00:36:03.640 Rarely.

00:36:05.240 5%.

00:36:05.840 Now we

00:36:06.720 get to

00:36:07.000 keep all

00:36:07.360 the 5% 1.00

00:36:07.980 that are

00:36:08.400 true and

00:36:09.640 so actually

00:36:10.360 cancer cures

00:36:11.600 are building

00:36:12.100 up and

00:36:12.480 actually getting

00:36:13.500 pretty substantial

00:36:14.580 at this

00:36:14.880 point.

00:36:15.460 But they're

00:36:15.840 all the

00:36:16.160 exceptions.

00:36:17.660 It's just

00:36:18.080 that the

00:36:18.340 exceptions we

00:36:18.960 keep, we

00:36:19.940 sort of forget

00:36:20.480 about the

00:36:20.880 ones that

00:36:21.220 didn't work.

00:36:22.660 So those

00:36:23.480 are three

00:36:23.880 categories and

00:36:24.640 there are

00:36:24.840 lots more

00:36:25.460 where as

00:36:26.500 soon as you

00:36:26.880 hear the

00:36:27.200 category,

00:36:28.560 your brain

00:36:29.120 should

00:36:29.440 automatically

00:36:30.240 go into

00:36:30.800 the probably

00:36:32.140 not mode.

00:36:34.100 But still,

00:36:35.660 it could be

00:36:36.200 the 5%.

00:36:37.100 Right?

00:36:38.780 Somebody said

00:36:39.500 to me,

00:36:39.960 Scott,

00:36:41.080 wouldn't that

00:36:41.620 describe you

00:36:42.640 in 2016?

00:36:44.580 Weren't you

00:36:45.260 in the

00:36:45.600 5% who

00:36:47.120 said Trump

00:36:47.620 was going

00:36:47.980 to win

00:36:48.260 that election

00:36:48.940 even though

00:36:50.420 almost all

00:36:51.560 the experts

00:36:52.140 said no?

00:36:53.420 So Scott,

00:36:54.220 aren't you

00:36:54.520 being a

00:36:54.860 hypocrite?

00:36:55.760 Because you

00:36:56.140 are exactly

00:36:56.780 what you

00:36:57.660 describe as

00:36:58.380 non-credible.

00:36:59.700 To which I

00:37:00.360 say,

00:37:01.400 good point.

00:37:04.000 Exactly.

00:37:05.720 If you

00:37:06.400 believed me

00:37:07.160 in 2016,

00:37:09.060 you might

00:37:09.760 have made

00:37:10.060 a bad

00:37:10.400 decision.

00:37:10.860 I

00:37:11.000 don't

00:37:11.060 know.

00:37:11.140 I

00:37:13.000 don't

00:37:13.140 because I

00:37:15.180 was a

00:37:15.500 category

00:37:16.060 that should

00:37:17.440 have been

00:37:17.680 wrong

00:37:18.080 95%

00:37:19.400 of the

00:37:19.620 time.

00:37:21.440 But

00:37:21.960 my 5%

00:37:23.900 came through.

00:37:25.240 Now,

00:37:25.520 I think

00:37:26.000 it's true

00:37:26.460 because I

00:37:27.680 could see

00:37:28.020 I had

00:37:29.340 some extra

00:37:30.620 information.

00:37:32.360 So it

00:37:32.860 wasn't so

00:37:33.320 much that

00:37:34.620 I was a

00:37:35.480 rogue.

00:37:36.280 I just

00:37:36.820 had the

00:37:37.100 information

00:37:37.500 you didn't

00:37:37.920 have.

00:37:38.220 If you

00:37:38.820 had trained

00:37:39.260 as a

00:37:39.920 persuader

00:37:40.420 and other

00:37:41.760 people who

00:37:42.240 had also

00:37:42.600 had that

00:37:42.940 training

00:37:43.240 could see

00:37:43.740 it too.

00:37:44.620 So that

00:37:44.960 was the

00:37:45.220 special case.

00:37:46.320 But I

00:37:46.860 agree totally

00:37:47.560 that if you

00:37:48.900 were going

00:37:49.120 to bet

00:37:49.380 money on

00:37:50.000 it,

00:37:51.060 the smart

00:37:51.640 money was

00:37:52.080 betting

00:37:52.300 against me.

00:37:54.080 You get

00:37:54.680 that,

00:37:54.940 right?

00:37:55.860 I got that

00:37:56.620 one right,

00:37:57.200 but the smart

00:37:57.820 money would

00:37:58.240 have bet

00:37:58.460 against me.

00:37:59.020 And even

00:37:59.320 I would

00:37:59.660 have bet

00:37:59.840 against me.

00:38:01.100 If I

00:38:01.560 were looking

00:38:01.960 at me

00:38:02.240 from the

00:38:02.520 outside,

00:38:02.980 I would

00:38:03.160 have bet

00:38:03.340 against me

00:38:03.920 because I

00:38:04.580 was a

00:38:04.860 category

00:38:05.240 that's

00:38:05.580 usually

00:38:05.820 wrong.

00:38:07.500 All

00:38:07.620 right.

00:38:07.760 So I

00:38:08.940 say also

00:38:09.560 that the

00:38:10.100 rogue

00:38:10.480 doctor

00:38:11.060 category,

00:38:12.180 the doctor

00:38:13.340 who is

00:38:13.780 saying

00:38:13.980 things

00:38:14.380 that are

00:38:14.620 quite

00:38:14.960 different

00:38:15.360 than the

00:38:15.800 mainstream,

00:38:16.900 is a

00:38:17.620 category

00:38:18.080 that is

00:38:18.720 95%

00:38:19.620 wrong.

00:38:21.080 So if

00:38:21.320 you're going

00:38:21.560 to bet,

00:38:22.700 bet against

00:38:23.300 it every

00:38:23.720 time.

00:38:24.720 5% of

00:38:25.500 the time

00:38:25.660 you'll

00:38:25.860 lose your

00:38:26.140 bet.

00:38:27.500 Now,

00:38:28.100 is Dr.

00:38:29.800 McAuliffe

00:38:30.320 in the

00:38:31.380 5%

00:38:32.160 or the

00:38:32.660 95%?

00:38:34.600 I don't

00:38:35.360 know.

00:38:36.820 I don't

00:38:37.180 know.

00:38:38.140 How would

00:38:38.820 I know?

00:38:40.180 How do

00:38:40.760 you know?

00:38:42.380 How could

00:38:42.780 anybody know?

00:38:44.420 It's

00:38:44.680 unknowable.

00:38:45.940 I'll tell

00:38:46.300 you what

00:38:46.600 people said

00:38:47.300 to me.

00:38:47.600 They said,

00:38:48.460 Scott,

00:38:48.820 Scott,

00:38:48.980 Scott,

00:38:49.260 listen to

00:38:49.720 the whole

00:38:50.180 thing.

00:38:51.280 If you

00:38:51.640 listen to

00:38:52.040 the whole

00:38:52.460 thing,

00:38:52.960 it's way

00:38:53.480 more

00:38:53.700 credible.

00:38:55.860 Do I

00:38:56.520 agree?

00:38:57.920 Absolutely.

00:38:59.300 If you

00:38:59.940 listen to

00:39:00.380 the entire

00:39:01.040 presentation

00:39:01.680 of anybody

00:39:02.380 who's

00:39:02.820 wrong,

00:39:03.660 it will

00:39:04.260 look really

00:39:04.760 credible by

00:39:05.440 the time

00:39:05.720 you're done.

00:39:06.740 Also,

00:39:07.160 anybody

00:39:07.520 who's

00:39:07.780 right.

00:39:09.300 Those

00:39:09.740 two will

00:39:10.140 look the

00:39:10.480 same to

00:39:10.820 you because

00:39:12.120 you can't

00:39:12.740 really judge

00:39:13.540 this rogue

00:39:14.960 doctor.

00:39:16.160 If he

00:39:16.720 makes a

00:39:17.220 claim,

00:39:17.540 I'm not

00:39:17.820 going to

00:39:17.960 look it

00:39:18.240 up.

00:39:19.020 I mean,

00:39:19.220 I could,

00:39:20.000 but I'm

00:39:20.300 not.

00:39:21.500 So,

00:39:22.160 be very,

00:39:23.420 very careful.

00:39:23.960 credible.

00:39:24.660 Now,

00:39:25.180 let me give

00:39:26.040 you a 0.57

00:39:26.360 couple of

00:39:26.800 hints that

00:39:27.960 are by

00:39:28.300 no means

00:39:29.000 the end

00:39:31.280 of the

00:39:31.540 story.

00:39:32.500 I'll tell

00:39:33.020 you one

00:39:33.320 thing that

00:39:33.720 is biasing

00:39:34.320 me terribly,

00:39:35.900 and I'm

00:39:36.420 going to

00:39:36.560 give you a

00:39:36.920 little persuasion

00:39:37.940 lesson here.

00:39:38.600 Now,

00:39:39.660 I want to be

00:39:40.020 clear,

00:39:41.200 and this is a

00:39:42.140 very subtle

00:39:42.680 point,

00:39:43.080 but it's so

00:39:43.440 important.

00:39:45.300 This doesn't

00:39:46.200 mean he's

00:39:46.940 not credible.

00:39:47.820 I'm going to

00:39:48.220 play you a

00:39:49.220 clip of Dr.

00:39:50.060 McCullough's

00:39:50.640 voice.

00:39:52.480 I'm going to

00:39:52.840 put it in

00:39:53.200 the context

00:39:53.740 of persuasion,

00:39:55.260 and I'm going

00:39:55.640 to tell you

00:39:56.040 that the

00:39:56.460 voice technique

00:39:58.220 he uses

00:39:59.060 is non-persuasive,

00:40:04.280 but that

00:40:05.280 doesn't mean

00:40:05.740 wrong.

00:40:07.300 Okay,

00:40:07.620 let me be

00:40:08.080 clear.

00:40:08.860 I'm not

00:40:09.220 saying he's

00:40:09.700 wrong.

00:40:10.860 I'm saying

00:40:11.240 he's choosing

00:40:11.880 a style of

00:40:12.600 communication

00:40:13.200 which instantly

00:40:14.900 smacks as 1.00

00:40:16.000 non-credible

00:40:16.700 to me.

00:40:18.080 And I've

00:40:18.980 described this

00:40:19.560 before.

00:40:19.880 Did I

00:40:20.660 describe this

00:40:21.240 only on

00:40:21.700 locals,

00:40:22.320 or did I

00:40:22.700 tell the

00:40:23.020 YouTube

00:40:23.240 people to?

00:40:24.720 Have I

00:40:25.320 described the

00:40:26.300 pleading

00:40:26.960 voice?

00:40:28.920 There are

00:40:29.500 two ways

00:40:30.000 to talk

00:40:30.600 when you're

00:40:31.180 persuading.

00:40:32.280 One is the

00:40:32.960 matter-of-fact

00:40:33.660 voice,

00:40:34.840 where you're

00:40:35.220 just laying

00:40:35.660 out the

00:40:35.960 facts,

00:40:36.920 and here

00:40:37.240 they are,

00:40:38.420 nothing to

00:40:39.020 talk about.

00:40:40.800 That's

00:40:41.280 persuasive.

00:40:42.600 But if

00:40:42.980 you're saying

00:40:43.420 this,

00:40:44.620 look at the

00:40:45.460 data,

00:40:46.420 look at the

00:40:46.820 data,

00:40:48.320 that's the

00:40:48.900 pleading

00:40:49.820 voice.

00:40:50.680 That's

00:40:51.180 begging the

00:40:51.900 viewer to

00:40:52.400 believe you

00:40:52.960 because you

00:40:54.220 don't believe

00:40:54.780 yourself.

00:40:56.760 That's why

00:40:57.340 it's non-persuasive.

00:40:58.720 You sound like

00:40:59.700 a person who

00:41:00.300 hasn't convinced

00:41:00.940 themselves.

00:41:02.220 Because why are

00:41:03.000 you talking that

00:41:03.580 way?

00:41:03.840 Now, if you

00:41:05.760 want to see an

00:41:06.240 example of the

00:41:07.020 best persuasive

00:41:08.560 voice, it's

00:41:10.120 just really

00:41:10.620 good.

00:41:11.420 There's a

00:41:12.520 series on

00:41:13.720 Hulu, I

00:41:14.640 think, called

00:41:15.800 Dope Sick.

00:41:17.580 It's the

00:41:18.060 story of

00:41:18.740 Oxycontin and

00:41:21.040 the Purdue

00:41:22.240 company and

00:41:23.140 the Sackler

00:41:23.720 family.

00:41:24.620 Now, I've

00:41:24.900 just watched

00:41:25.300 the first part

00:41:27.500 of it.

00:41:28.200 But there's a

00:41:28.960 scene in there,

00:41:29.620 if you watch

00:41:30.180 that, there's a

00:41:30.940 salesperson who

00:41:32.280 was played by

00:41:33.040 an actor, and

00:41:34.280 then the actor

00:41:34.960 is giving his

00:41:36.000 pitch to a

00:41:36.740 doctor.

00:41:38.660 Listen to

00:41:39.400 that.

00:41:40.720 You want to

00:41:41.520 see how to

00:41:41.960 modulate your

00:41:42.620 voice to be

00:41:44.260 persuasive.

00:41:45.520 I don't know

00:41:46.420 if that was

00:41:46.920 the actor's,

00:41:48.120 what the actor

00:41:48.860 brought to the

00:41:49.460 role, or if

00:41:50.960 it was directed

00:41:51.680 that way or

00:41:52.480 written that way.

00:41:53.400 It's a little

00:41:54.000 unclear.

00:41:54.960 But some

00:41:55.580 combination of

00:41:56.320 the writing and

00:41:56.920 the acting and

00:41:57.520 the directing

00:41:58.020 gives you

00:41:59.280 perfect persuasion

00:42:01.580 voice.

00:42:02.540 Now, when

00:42:03.000 you watch

00:42:03.320 it, don't

00:42:04.340 be fooled by

00:42:04.920 the fact that

00:42:05.420 the actor

00:42:05.780 also has a

00:42:07.740 very pleasant

00:42:08.620 voice, a

00:42:09.840 nice, rich,

00:42:11.660 deep kind of

00:42:12.640 voice that has

00:42:13.440 nothing to do

00:42:14.080 with what I'm

00:42:14.480 talking about.

00:42:16.100 That's not

00:42:16.940 technique.

00:42:17.780 That's just

00:42:18.200 something he

00:42:18.660 was born with.

00:42:20.120 He may have

00:42:20.680 a little

00:42:21.020 technique.

00:42:22.340 But just

00:42:23.060 listen to the

00:42:23.820 matter-of-factness

00:42:25.020 as he lays

00:42:26.460 out the facts,

00:42:27.960 which you find

00:42:29.000 out later, or

00:42:29.900 actually you find

00:42:30.600 out soon, are

00:42:31.400 not facts.

00:42:32.060 But the

00:42:32.960 way that

00:42:33.620 salesperson lays

00:42:35.000 it out, damn, 0.69

00:42:36.840 you would think

00:42:37.260 that was true.

00:42:38.280 It is so

00:42:38.940 persuasive.

00:42:40.180 Even knowing

00:42:40.720 it's not true, you

00:42:41.440 think it sounds

00:42:42.040 pretty good.

00:42:43.380 All right?

00:42:43.960 Now compare that

00:42:44.820 with, I'm going to

00:42:45.860 play just a clip,

00:42:47.960 and look for,

00:42:49.600 this is Dr.

00:42:50.740 McAuliffe on

00:42:52.580 Joe Rogan's show.

00:42:54.840 And listen to the

00:42:55.980 voice and see if it

00:42:57.060 sounds like matter-of-fact

00:42:58.240 or pleading with

00:42:59.700 you to believe.

00:43:00.760 These books are

00:43:01.840 basically nonfiction.

00:43:03.640 They have a thousand

00:43:05.060 citations in the

00:43:05.960 Bregan book showing

00:43:06.980 how it was

00:43:07.740 coordinated and

00:43:08.860 planned.

00:43:09.300 Now Bobby Kennedy

00:43:09.940 has his book out,

00:43:10.940 The Real Anthony

00:43:11.680 Fauci, the most

00:43:12.780 mentioned physician

00:43:14.040 in that book.

00:43:14.860 I can tell you that

00:43:16.120 if you want to find

00:43:16.880 the evidence that

00:43:18.120 Moderna was working

00:43:18.860 on the vaccine

00:43:19.520 before the virus

00:43:20.720 ever emanated out

00:43:22.460 of the lab, if you

00:43:23.060 wanted to find the

00:43:23.740 collusions and the

00:43:25.400 operations between

00:43:26.240 the Gates Foundation

00:43:26.900 and Gavi and

00:43:27.560 CEPI and Pfizer

00:43:28.360 and Moderna and

00:43:29.360 the vaccine

00:43:29.700 manufacturers and

00:43:30.580 the Wuhan lab and

00:43:31.700 the National Institutes

00:43:32.360 of Health and

00:43:32.740 Ralph Barrett and

00:43:33.420 University of North

00:43:34.020 Carolina and

00:43:34.540 how all this was

00:43:35.880 organized.

00:43:36.460 If you want to see

00:43:37.040 the Johns Hopkins

00:43:38.000 planning seminar

00:43:38.900 called the Spars

00:43:40.040 pandemic in 2017

00:43:41.720 where they had a

00:43:42.580 symposium, people

00:43:43.220 showed up, they

00:43:44.020 wrote up their

00:43:44.540 symposium findings,

00:43:45.500 they published this,

00:43:46.440 it says it's going

00:43:47.260 to be a coronavirus,

00:43:48.940 it's going to be

00:43:49.660 related to MERS

00:43:50.360 and SARS.

00:43:53.500 Now, again, I

00:43:55.200 have to be really

00:43:56.160 clear.

00:43:57.780 The way he

00:43:58.800 communicates biases

00:44:01.200 me to think that

00:44:02.400 it's not credible.

00:44:04.320 But it could just

00:44:06.180 be a technique

00:44:06.820 problem.

00:44:08.580 You get that,

00:44:09.260 right?

00:44:09.800 It could be,

00:44:12.860 oh, even in the

00:44:14.000 not sped up

00:44:14.740 playback.

00:44:16.100 Yeah, I think

00:44:16.820 mine was sped up.

00:44:18.420 So don't be fooled

00:44:19.440 by the rapidness

00:44:20.900 of his talking.

00:44:21.840 That's not what

00:44:22.360 I'm talking about.

00:44:23.220 I'm talking about

00:44:24.040 the pleading

00:44:25.380 quality.

00:44:25.920 which you could

00:44:27.160 hear it at slow

00:44:27.940 motion the same.

00:44:29.080 It would also

00:44:29.540 sound pleading.

00:44:31.400 But, oh, okay.

00:44:34.880 Somebody's saying,

00:44:35.960 let's see if I can

00:44:36.840 change the speed.

00:44:38.260 I don't know if I

00:44:38.800 have that option on

00:44:39.920 the Twitter playback.

00:44:42.920 It doesn't, I can't

00:44:44.920 do that quickly.

00:44:46.120 But if you'd like to

00:44:46.920 do that yourself,

00:44:47.640 that's a fair, that's

00:44:48.520 a fair comment, by

00:44:49.380 the way, that

00:44:50.260 speeding it up

00:44:51.000 changes how it's

00:44:52.340 received.

00:44:52.780 But I think you'll

00:44:53.920 see that if you

00:44:54.480 play it slowly, you

00:44:56.640 get the pleading

00:44:57.520 just, it's just

00:44:59.120 slower.

00:45:00.180 But you're right.

00:45:01.100 That wasn't fair to

00:45:02.120 show it.

00:45:03.000 So let me acknowledge

00:45:04.300 that wasn't fair to

00:45:06.420 show it at a higher

00:45:07.300 speed.

00:45:07.720 I didn't do that

00:45:08.240 intentionally.

00:45:08.820 I must have some

00:45:09.420 setting in YouTube.

00:45:12.460 But, doesn't mean

00:45:14.840 he's wrong.

00:45:16.340 Right?

00:45:17.040 You've got to be

00:45:17.680 really clear.

00:45:18.520 Doesn't mean he's

00:45:19.200 wrong.

00:45:20.420 But he's using a

00:45:21.500 communication style

00:45:22.500 that screams not

00:45:24.220 credible, whether it

00:45:26.580 is or not.

00:45:28.320 All right.

00:45:28.880 So I hope you

00:45:29.620 learned something.

00:45:32.540 I hope you learned

00:45:33.440 something from that.

00:45:35.440 Let me tell you the

00:45:36.600 other thing that

00:45:37.680 gave me pause.

00:45:40.580 Joe asked him about

00:45:41.620 masks.

00:45:43.660 Now, what do you

00:45:44.580 think a doctor

00:45:45.620 should say about

00:45:46.700 masks?

00:45:47.340 Well, he gave a

00:45:50.240 very indirect answer

00:45:51.660 which I felt was

00:45:52.900 playing to the

00:45:53.560 audience.

00:45:55.260 It looked like his

00:45:57.380 honest answer may

00:45:58.520 have not been

00:45:59.240 exactly what Joe

00:46:00.760 Rogan's audience

00:46:01.580 wanted to hear.

00:46:03.540 That was just a

00:46:04.480 feeling I got.

00:46:05.320 Again, I'm not a

00:46:06.180 mind reader, so I

00:46:07.640 can't know what's in

00:46:08.360 his head.

00:46:09.000 That would be

00:46:09.520 unfair.

00:46:10.700 But I'll tell you

00:46:11.780 the way I received

00:46:12.560 it was he was

00:46:14.500 tap dancing on

00:46:15.520 masks.

00:46:17.340 And the moment I

00:46:18.040 heard him tap

00:46:18.740 dance on masks, I

00:46:21.540 lost all belief in

00:46:22.620 anything else he

00:46:23.460 had to say.

00:46:25.180 So as a general

00:46:26.160 rule, if somebody

00:46:27.180 has a large message

00:46:28.480 and there's only one

00:46:29.620 part of it you

00:46:30.160 understand, and you

00:46:31.620 know that part

00:46:32.240 doesn't make sense,

00:46:34.120 you are free to

00:46:35.620 extend that lack of

00:46:36.840 credibility to the

00:46:37.780 whole.

00:46:38.540 That would not be

00:46:39.280 irrational.

00:46:40.180 If you knew there

00:46:41.820 was just one part of

00:46:42.700 it you could be

00:46:43.300 certain about.

00:46:43.960 So I'm still

00:46:47.320 seeing some

00:46:47.780 complaints that

00:46:48.540 the speeding it

00:46:49.300 up changed

00:46:49.960 everything.

00:46:52.840 Let's look at it

00:46:54.060 again tomorrow.

00:46:55.000 I'll check it on

00:46:55.920 lower speed.

00:46:56.920 I don't think it

00:46:57.680 changed everything.

00:46:59.520 I think it did

00:47:00.980 exacerbate it, but

00:47:02.780 the effect is still

00:47:03.640 there.

00:47:03.860 You know, the

00:47:09.080 pitch is not

00:47:11.620 important except

00:47:12.820 for how it's

00:47:13.860 modulated.

00:47:15.940 Right?

00:47:16.560 So it doesn't

00:47:17.280 matter that he

00:47:17.740 has a high-pitched

00:47:18.600 voice or a low-pitched

00:47:19.500 voice.

00:47:19.920 That's not part of

00:47:20.920 persuasion.

00:47:22.220 You know, the

00:47:22.760 low-pitched

00:47:23.420 executive voice, it

00:47:26.540 can have a little

00:47:27.140 persuasive value, but

00:47:28.240 you don't really need

00:47:28.900 that.

00:47:29.460 It's optional.

00:47:30.120 He has a great

00:47:32.900 track record with

00:47:33.800 his COVID patients.

00:47:35.340 Do you know who

00:47:35.840 else has a great

00:47:36.780 track record with

00:47:37.800 their COVID patients?

00:47:40.200 Everybody.

00:47:42.440 Because we've got

00:47:43.240 really good

00:47:43.640 treatments now.

00:47:45.720 Plus, most people

00:47:46.680 get better.

00:47:49.140 All right.

00:47:52.200 By the way,

00:47:52.960 Dope Sick, that

00:47:53.800 is really well

00:47:55.820 done.

00:47:56.240 I thought that I

00:47:57.040 wouldn't like it

00:47:57.680 because it was

00:47:58.100 just going to be

00:47:58.660 sad and poorly

00:48:00.540 made.

00:48:01.040 But it's actually

00:48:01.500 made so well.

00:48:02.820 Just the artistry

00:48:05.020 of making it is

00:48:07.360 really high, so

00:48:08.080 it's really good

00:48:08.720 to watch.

00:48:12.440 All right.

00:48:15.880 So somebody

00:48:16.700 asked if a

00:48:18.500 cartoonist is

00:48:19.320 credible.

00:48:19.980 So I tweeted

00:48:21.260 his question because

00:48:22.200 he had a little

00:48:22.620 graph there.

00:48:23.920 The last I

00:48:24.360 checked it, 59%

00:48:26.380 said I was

00:48:27.060 credible, 22%

00:48:29.080 say I'm a

00:48:29.720 paid operative.

00:48:32.360 22%.

00:48:32.880 22%, round it

00:48:35.300 up to 25%.

00:48:38.880 Yes, that's

00:48:40.520 exactly the

00:48:41.120 number of people

00:48:41.640 who answer

00:48:42.180 every poll

00:48:43.060 wrong, no

00:48:45.080 matter the

00:48:45.560 question.

00:48:47.200 All right.

00:48:48.900 Here's a list

00:48:49.940 of how to

00:48:50.400 participate in a

00:48:51.280 debate if you

00:48:52.200 have nothing to

00:48:52.820 say to me.

00:48:54.480 You could use

00:48:55.380 any of these

00:48:55.900 phrases to show

00:48:56.820 that you have

00:48:57.200 put no thought

00:48:57.900 whatsoever into

00:48:58.760 your point of

00:48:59.360 view, and you

00:49:01.360 just wanted to

00:49:01.840 say something.

00:49:03.180 So sometimes we

00:49:03.940 just like to say

00:49:04.600 something, be part

00:49:05.740 of it.

00:49:06.700 So if you'd like to

00:49:07.540 be part of a

00:49:08.240 conversation with

00:49:09.060 me on some

00:49:09.820 topic, and you

00:49:11.520 don't have anything

00:49:12.320 whatsoever to say

00:49:13.260 of use, use any

00:49:15.020 of these phrases.

00:49:17.480 He's jumping the

00:49:18.360 shark now.

00:49:19.900 He jumped the

00:49:20.680 shark now.

00:49:21.180 Well, look who's

00:49:23.520 the pointy hair

00:49:24.120 boss now.

00:49:26.140 I guess we

00:49:27.520 know who's the

00:49:28.060 pointy hair boss

00:49:28.840 now.

00:49:30.540 That's just like

00:49:31.380 the matrix.

00:49:34.200 That reminds me

00:49:35.180 of Soylent Green.

00:49:38.140 Oh, oh, so

00:49:39.480 you're an

00:49:39.780 apologist.

00:49:40.720 You're an

00:49:41.040 apologist now.

00:49:42.080 Can we call you

00:49:42.700 an apologist?

00:49:43.900 You apologist?

00:49:44.460 I saw it with

00:49:47.500 my own eyes,

00:49:49.080 Scott.

00:49:50.120 Don't tell me it

00:49:50.860 didn't happen.

00:49:51.620 I saw it with

00:49:53.020 my own eyes.

00:49:54.860 Heard it with

00:49:55.440 my own ears.

00:49:59.240 So say that.

00:50:01.580 Any sheep

00:50:02.300 references are

00:50:03.040 good.

00:50:04.200 Sheep.

00:50:05.260 You're a sheep.

00:50:06.100 Somebody's a

00:50:06.600 sheep.

00:50:07.720 Everybody's a 0.59

00:50:08.420 sheep.

00:50:09.460 Any kind of

00:50:10.040 sheep reference

00:50:10.680 is good.

00:50:12.160 Also, 1984,

00:50:13.820 the book,

00:50:14.460 Hitler, and 0.55

00:50:15.340 anything with

00:50:15.920 fascists, of

00:50:16.600 course.

00:50:16.900 Just throw that

00:50:17.520 into any

00:50:18.140 reference.

00:50:19.800 Each of these

00:50:20.520 go with every

00:50:21.040 argument, really.

00:50:23.000 Now, on the

00:50:23.860 sheep reference,

00:50:25.320 may I say

00:50:25.860 this?

00:50:27.400 I think the

00:50:28.200 sheep reference

00:50:28.860 is the lowest

00:50:29.700 level of

00:50:30.500 thinking in

00:50:31.660 the pandemic.

00:50:34.080 Oh, yeah.

00:50:35.100 Scott is such

00:50:35.740 a sophist.

00:50:38.060 I have to add

00:50:38.820 that to my

00:50:39.240 list.

00:50:40.160 Yeah, that's

00:50:40.480 a good one.

00:50:40.900 You know

00:50:45.180 everybody's a

00:50:45.960 sheep, right?

00:50:47.340 So the

00:50:47.840 funniest thing

00:50:48.320 about 2021 is

00:50:49.700 sheep calling

00:50:50.520 other sheep

00:50:51.060 sheep, and

00:50:52.660 then the

00:50:52.980 sheep that

00:50:53.360 they're calling

00:50:53.760 sheep are

00:50:54.260 saying, I'm

00:50:55.620 not a sheep,

00:50:56.200 you're the

00:50:56.500 sheep.

00:50:57.740 Like, nobody's

00:50:58.440 aware that we're

00:50:59.180 all sheep.

00:51:01.340 Well, here's

00:51:02.040 what I mean by

00:51:02.580 that.

00:51:03.520 With the

00:51:04.180 vaccinations, the

00:51:06.220 anti-vaxxers are

00:51:07.240 saying, you're

00:51:08.220 sheep, and you're

00:51:09.180 afraid of

00:51:09.940 COVID, that's

00:51:11.220 why you're

00:51:11.540 getting the

00:51:11.860 vaccination.

00:51:13.360 But then the

00:51:13.920 sheep say, but

00:51:15.240 wait a minute, are

00:51:15.840 you afraid of

00:51:16.420 the vaccination?

00:51:18.780 I'm afraid of

00:51:19.580 the COVID, you're

00:51:21.120 afraid of the

00:51:21.600 vaccination, doesn't 0.98

00:51:23.380 that make both of

00:51:24.020 us sheep?

00:51:26.180 I think we're

00:51:26.960 both sheep, because

00:51:28.360 we're both afraid of

00:51:29.160 something, and we

00:51:29.920 don't know.

00:51:31.640 So as soon as you

00:51:32.720 think it's the

00:51:33.280 other person who's

00:51:34.120 a sheep, you've

00:51:35.840 left the ground of

00:51:36.860 rational conversation.

00:51:39.980 Here's something I

00:51:40.860 didn't know.

00:51:41.600 This is also an

00:51:42.420 Andres Beckhaus

00:51:43.500 discovery, meaning

00:51:46.040 that the data was

00:51:47.020 already out there,

00:51:47.920 easy to find, but

00:51:48.820 for some reason he

00:51:49.640 got it and you

00:51:50.240 didn't.

00:51:51.640 Did you think the

00:51:52.540 suicides went up

00:51:53.540 during the

00:51:54.200 lockdowns?

00:51:55.840 How many of you

00:51:56.700 think the suicides

00:51:57.820 are up during the

00:51:59.060 pandemic?

00:52:00.460 Reveal yourselves.

00:52:02.300 How many say

00:52:03.040 suicides are up?

00:52:07.260 They're down.

00:52:09.180 But, not equally.

00:52:13.640 Turns out that

00:52:14.520 they're down in

00:52:16.500 every category

00:52:17.820 except, no wait,

00:52:21.100 they're down, no

00:52:23.860 they're up in every

00:52:24.620 category except adult

00:52:26.180 white men, I think.

00:52:27.520 Did I read that

00:52:29.320 right?

00:52:29.520 Yeah, I think

00:52:33.060 that's it.

00:52:34.820 So, only white 0.94

00:52:36.100 adults had

00:52:39.040 fewer suicides.

00:52:41.440 But other groups

00:52:42.320 had a little bit

00:52:42.880 more, but overall

00:52:43.840 because there's a

00:52:44.820 lot of white

00:52:45.460 adults killing

00:52:46.120 themselves.

00:52:47.900 So, I guess it's

00:52:48.800 not men, it's

00:52:49.440 adults.

00:52:51.900 And it says the

00:52:52.780 overall decline, I

00:52:53.940 think this was from

00:52:54.940 NPR, the overall

00:52:56.660 decline was driven

00:52:57.560 mostly, almost

00:52:58.760 entirely, by a

00:53:00.420 drop in suicides

00:53:01.300 among white

00:53:01.900 people, who

00:53:04.060 apparently kill

00:53:04.800 themselves at a

00:53:05.420 higher rate than

00:53:06.000 any other group.

00:53:07.600 Did you know

00:53:07.980 that?

00:53:08.860 Did you know that

00:53:09.500 white people kill 0.97

00:53:10.320 themselves at the

00:53:11.060 highest rate?

00:53:11.660 Now, how do you

00:53:16.920 define equity?

00:53:20.740 Because I've said

00:53:21.680 this before,

00:53:22.700 shouldn't you just

00:53:23.300 measure everybody's

00:53:25.400 level of happiness

00:53:26.280 and if they're

00:53:27.760 similar, you're

00:53:28.400 done, right?

00:53:29.580 You don't have to

00:53:30.260 give anybody extra

00:53:31.180 money or anything if

00:53:32.060 everybody's equally

00:53:32.760 happy the way they

00:53:33.520 are.

00:53:34.520 But if white

00:53:35.860 people are killing

00:53:36.580 themselves at the

00:53:37.480 highest rate, I

00:53:40.900 think that's a

00:53:41.420 red flag, or

00:53:43.420 maybe we're

00:53:43.960 looking at this

00:53:44.580 whole equality

00:53:45.700 thing in a less

00:53:47.960 than optimal way.

00:53:51.860 But I guess

00:53:52.300 for, anyway, so

00:53:57.260 I have some

00:53:58.100 theories about

00:53:59.120 that.

00:54:00.540 Here's one of

00:54:01.320 them.

00:54:02.380 I'm not sure

00:54:03.040 that we counted

00:54:03.900 suicides correctly

00:54:05.740 during the

00:54:06.700 pandemic, or in

00:54:08.560 general.

00:54:09.220 Here's why.

00:54:09.820 A lot of

00:54:10.860 suicidal people

00:54:11.700 are also drug

00:54:12.880 addicts.

00:54:14.720 Because why

00:54:15.340 wouldn't you be,

00:54:16.080 really?

00:54:16.640 If you're

00:54:17.240 suicidal, it

00:54:18.440 almost doesn't

00:54:19.080 make sense not

00:54:19.800 to do drugs.

00:54:21.540 Okay, I

00:54:22.180 shouldn't say

00:54:22.540 that.

00:54:22.980 Take that

00:54:23.320 back.

00:54:23.900 That was an

00:54:24.300 irresponsible thing

00:54:25.120 to say.

00:54:26.260 Bring it back.

00:54:27.700 There's some

00:54:28.300 things that are

00:54:28.760 true, but you

00:54:29.280 just shouldn't

00:54:29.680 say.

00:54:31.060 So I

00:54:32.280 shouldn't have

00:54:32.600 said that, but

00:54:33.920 it's true.

00:54:34.260 And I

00:54:38.520 have a, well,

00:54:40.240 I won't tell

00:54:40.820 you why I

00:54:42.240 think this, but

00:54:43.660 I do know

00:54:44.240 that people

00:54:46.040 who take too

00:54:46.780 many drugs and

00:54:47.580 stop worrying

00:54:48.260 about overdosing

00:54:49.120 might be in the

00:54:50.140 suicidal group.

00:54:52.140 So I think

00:54:52.620 some percentage

00:54:53.980 of the overdoses

00:54:55.460 are, let's

00:54:56.800 say, an

00:54:57.520 accidental

00:54:59.320 death without

00:55:01.880 much regard for

00:55:03.240 whether they

00:55:03.680 would die,

00:55:04.860 meaning that

00:55:05.460 people didn't

00:55:06.340 protect their

00:55:06.980 own life because

00:55:08.720 they weren't that

00:55:09.240 concerned about

00:55:09.820 living.

00:55:10.720 Is that suicide?

00:55:12.060 If you do

00:55:12.560 things that you

00:55:13.100 know could kill

00:55:13.680 you because

00:55:15.100 you're not

00:55:15.480 interested in

00:55:16.320 living, it's

00:55:18.100 suicide-ish, even

00:55:19.460 if you didn't

00:55:19.900 know what would

00:55:20.320 happen on that

00:55:20.900 particular day.

00:55:22.340 You might be

00:55:22.900 just redlining

00:55:25.320 how much drugs

00:55:26.180 you're taking,

00:55:27.100 but not really

00:55:28.000 planning to die.

00:55:29.660 You're just

00:55:30.240 okay with it if

00:55:30.980 it happens.

00:55:31.500 I don't know.

00:55:33.940 So I would

00:55:35.100 question the

00:55:35.880 data, but

00:55:36.540 if you

00:55:39.660 remember, I

00:55:40.600 don't know if

00:55:42.160 I'm remembering

00:55:42.820 it right.

00:55:43.220 Help me with

00:55:43.680 my memory.

00:55:44.520 I feel as

00:55:45.260 though I

00:55:45.880 predicted that

00:55:46.600 during the

00:55:47.180 pandemic there

00:55:48.280 would be fewer

00:55:49.460 suicides.

00:55:52.020 And I think he

00:55:52.740 was that people

00:55:54.900 would be in

00:55:55.760 close quarters with

00:55:56.640 their families.

00:55:57.800 They wouldn't be

00:55:58.740 bullied at school

00:55:59.540 the same way.

00:56:01.240 And that there

00:56:02.060 would just be

00:56:02.460 sort of less

00:56:02.940 opportunity because

00:56:04.020 we'd all just be

00:56:04.700 around each other

00:56:05.640 and I guess our

00:56:09.360 lives would be

00:56:10.200 constrained, but

00:56:12.220 you'd be with

00:56:12.780 your family more

00:56:13.460 even if you

00:56:13.880 didn't like it.

00:56:15.220 I just felt like

00:56:16.560 the situation was

00:56:17.940 we'd be watched

00:56:19.160 too much and

00:56:20.460 there would be

00:56:20.780 less of it.

00:56:22.020 Now I don't know

00:56:22.600 if that was a good

00:56:23.140 prediction or not,

00:56:23.980 but I did not

00:56:25.660 predict that there

00:56:26.280 would be more of it

00:56:26.960 early on.

00:56:27.520 Later on when

00:56:28.560 the statistics

00:56:29.240 seemed to show

00:56:30.080 that there was

00:56:30.480 more of it,

00:56:31.380 I think I

00:56:31.980 adopted that view.

00:56:36.600 Yeah, Red Fury

00:56:37.520 is asking,

00:56:38.220 did Scott really

00:56:39.000 say that?

00:56:39.580 That's what I'm

00:56:40.100 asking.

00:56:40.940 I'm asking because

00:56:42.040 I might have a

00:56:42.820 false memory of

00:56:43.540 that.

00:56:44.320 And I know that

00:56:44.960 I had at least

00:56:45.480 two different views.

00:56:46.540 I think I started

00:56:47.360 with, oh, I'm

00:56:47.980 seeing lots of

00:56:48.460 yeses on locals.

00:56:49.640 People do

00:56:50.060 remember.

00:56:52.500 I started with

00:56:53.660 the view that

00:56:54.660 there would be

00:56:55.360 fewer of them,

00:56:56.060 but I changed

00:56:57.680 it when the

00:56:58.360 data said

00:56:58.960 otherwise, but

00:56:59.820 apparently it

00:57:00.280 doesn't.

00:57:01.040 Apparently the

00:57:01.560 data doesn't

00:57:02.100 say otherwise.

00:57:03.340 Anyway, that

00:57:04.700 is about all I

00:57:05.520 have to do for

00:57:07.100 today.

00:57:10.040 Loneliness, yes.

00:57:11.720 There was less

00:57:12.680 loneliness, I

00:57:13.400 imagined, during

00:57:14.320 the pandemic.

00:57:15.640 Weirdly.

00:57:17.160 Good.

00:57:17.760 Thanks for

00:57:18.080 reminding me.

00:57:20.500 I'm now going

00:57:21.460 to do something

00:57:22.140 that will change

00:57:23.800 the lives of

00:57:24.720 approximately one

00:57:26.060 percent of

00:57:26.780 you.

00:57:27.940 Want to stay

00:57:28.680 around for

00:57:29.040 that?

00:57:29.920 It'll be

00:57:30.300 fast.

00:57:31.420 Ninety-nine

00:57:31.980 percent of

00:57:32.440 you, no

00:57:32.940 difference.

00:57:33.940 One percent of

00:57:34.680 you, I'm going

00:57:35.520 to change your

00:57:35.980 life right now.

00:57:37.360 I went

00:57:38.220 approximately 60

00:57:40.200 years of my

00:57:40.780 life believing

00:57:41.420 that I had

00:57:41.960 terrible allergies,

00:57:43.260 and those

00:57:43.880 allergies were 0.57

00:57:44.500 all the time.

00:57:47.280 I started

00:57:48.400 experimenting by

00:57:49.460 cutting out

00:57:50.120 different food

00:57:50.840 groups to

00:57:52.440 see if maybe I

00:57:53.360 had a food

00:57:53.860 allergy that I

00:57:55.140 was fooling

00:57:55.680 myself into

00:57:56.320 thinking it

00:57:56.780 was just

00:57:57.120 some kind

00:57:59.020 of grass

00:58:01.040 allergy or

00:58:01.540 something.

00:58:02.720 And finally,

00:58:04.400 I took out

00:58:05.040 of my life

00:58:05.720 one item,

00:58:06.900 which was

00:58:07.420 salad dressing.

00:58:10.060 It turns

00:58:10.460 out salad

00:58:10.900 dressing has

00:58:11.520 this additive

00:58:12.400 called sulfites.

00:58:14.820 I think it

00:58:15.680 keeps it from

00:58:16.960 spoiling or

00:58:17.640 something.

00:58:18.600 So,

00:58:18.960 sulfites.

00:58:20.100 Because I

00:58:20.720 first noticed

00:58:21.260 that I became

00:58:21.940 allergic to

00:58:22.960 alcohol,

00:58:23.820 and I

00:58:24.020 couldn't

00:58:24.200 figure out

00:58:24.640 why.

00:58:25.240 It's sort

00:58:25.580 of a

00:58:25.780 mysterious

00:58:26.140 thing.

00:58:27.500 But I

00:58:28.820 cut out a

00:58:29.440 salad from

00:58:30.140 my life,

00:58:31.400 so to get

00:58:32.020 rid of the

00:58:32.340 salad dressing,

00:58:33.280 and my

00:58:34.020 allergies

00:58:34.400 completely

00:58:35.340 transformed.

00:58:36.280 I do have

00:58:36.680 some kind of

00:58:37.020 baseline allergies,

00:58:37.960 but it went

00:58:38.660 from the worst

00:58:39.380 thing in the

00:58:39.760 world to just

00:58:40.460 sort of a

00:58:41.060 small bother.

00:58:42.700 Now,

00:58:43.740 here's the

00:58:44.240 first tip.

00:58:45.280 You should

00:58:45.620 do that if

00:58:46.400 you have

00:58:46.680 allergies.

00:58:47.760 Yeah,

00:58:48.020 wine is the

00:58:48.560 worst.

00:58:49.360 You should

00:58:49.900 do that if

00:58:50.340 you have

00:58:50.540 allergies.

00:58:51.200 Try to

00:58:51.780 rigorously

00:58:53.780 stick to a

00:58:55.300 certain kind

00:58:55.800 of diet for

00:58:56.440 a few weeks,

00:58:57.800 and then

00:58:58.260 maybe take

00:58:59.020 out one

00:58:59.480 item,

00:59:00.660 just one

00:59:01.140 item,

00:59:01.600 keep the

00:59:02.000 same diet

00:59:02.440 minus that

00:59:02.980 one item,

00:59:03.700 and then

00:59:04.100 just keep

00:59:04.480 repeating that.

00:59:05.940 Because I

00:59:06.540 believe that a

00:59:07.200 lot of you

00:59:07.560 have food

00:59:08.320 allergies,

00:59:08.920 not necessarily

00:59:09.560 the same

00:59:09.920 one I

00:59:10.200 have,

00:59:10.740 but I

00:59:11.100 think a

00:59:11.360 lot of

00:59:11.620 you have

00:59:11.940 food

00:59:12.480 allergies

00:59:12.940 that you

00:59:14.340 think are

00:59:14.840 regular

00:59:15.240 allergies.

00:59:16.660 Now,

00:59:17.020 in my

00:59:17.320 case,

00:59:17.720 I went

00:59:18.120 to test

00:59:18.560 this the

00:59:18.960 other

00:59:19.120 day,

00:59:19.740 and I

00:59:20.120 said to

00:59:20.340 myself,

00:59:20.820 I want

00:59:21.460 to be

00:59:21.700 positive.

00:59:22.480 It's the

00:59:22.820 salad dressing.

00:59:24.020 So my

00:59:24.620 first salad

00:59:25.420 in months,

00:59:26.920 and for

00:59:27.440 three days,

00:59:28.220 I could

00:59:28.520 hardly

00:59:28.980 breathe.

00:59:31.320 It took

00:59:31.980 days for

00:59:33.620 it to

00:59:33.860 die down.

00:59:34.740 Days.

00:59:36.180 And I

00:59:37.560 stayed off

00:59:38.000 salad for

00:59:38.380 a few

00:59:38.620 days,

00:59:38.920 and now

00:59:39.180 I'm back

00:59:39.980 to normal.

00:59:41.260 So about

00:59:42.800 1% of

00:59:43.520 you are

00:59:43.860 going to

00:59:44.060 look for

00:59:44.360 sulfites,

00:59:44.960 and here's

00:59:45.320 the trick.

00:59:46.160 They're not

00:59:46.680 listed on

00:59:47.340 the package.

00:59:48.560 How about

00:59:49.940 that?

00:59:51.000 Apparently,

00:59:51.720 it's one

00:59:51.960 of those

00:59:52.220 ingredients you

00:59:53.360 don't have

00:59:53.960 to list.

00:59:55.300 But it

00:59:56.060 typically is

00:59:56.680 in dressings.

00:59:58.420 If you

00:59:59.160 eat whole

00:59:59.620 foods,

01:00:00.160 well,

01:00:00.440 here's the

01:00:01.000 easy way

01:00:01.380 to test

01:00:01.760 it.

01:00:02.320 Just eat

01:00:02.820 whole foods

01:00:03.600 for a

01:00:04.120 week.

01:00:05.120 Just

01:00:05.360 nothing

01:00:05.940 that's

01:00:06.200 packaged

01:00:06.560 and

01:00:07.020 nothing

01:00:07.260 that's

01:00:07.960 a

01:00:08.440 sauce.

01:00:09.960 Just see.

01:00:11.340 If you

01:00:11.980 eat nothing

01:00:12.600 but whole

01:00:13.040 foods for a

01:00:13.620 week,

01:00:14.120 you will

01:00:14.700 feel really

01:00:15.160 different.

01:00:15.460 I've

01:00:16.520 tried that

01:00:17.040 and I

01:00:17.740 hate it

01:00:18.300 because I

01:00:18.880 don't want

01:00:19.200 to eat

01:00:19.360 whole foods

01:00:19.860 all the

01:00:20.160 time.

01:00:20.580 It's too

01:00:20.840 much of a

01:00:21.220 pain in

01:00:21.460 the ass. 0.77

01:00:21.840 It's not

01:00:22.140 delicious.

01:00:23.140 But you

01:00:23.760 will feel

01:00:24.160 different.

01:00:24.840 I guarantee

01:00:25.460 it.

01:00:26.060 You'll feel

01:00:26.500 it.

01:00:27.560 All right,

01:00:27.900 if that's

01:00:28.160 your last

01:00:28.500 tip of

01:00:28.780 the day,

01:00:29.360 I've got

01:00:29.620 to run

01:00:29.800 and do

01:00:30.000 something.

01:00:30.580 Bye for

01:00:31.000 now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 14, 2021

Episode 1592 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Mass Brainwashing Operations Going on Right Now

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript