Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1593 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Funny Stuff in the News Today

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that's ever happened to you.

00:00:09.020 Yep, I say that every day because it's true every single day.

00:00:12.600 We're going nowhere but up.

00:00:14.700 We're like the Omicron variant of podcasts.

00:00:18.220 You can't stop us, but we're mild.

00:00:20.940 We're mild and we won't hurt you, but you can't stop us.

00:00:24.400 And if you'd like to take this to the next level, and why wouldn't you?

00:00:27.660 Well, when I look at you, I see people who are smarter, better, sexier than everyone else who's not watching this.

00:00:36.580 And so I know you'd like to take it up to the next level, and all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice, a canteen jug or a flax, a vessel of any kind,

00:00:43.680 filling with your favorite liquid.

00:00:45.220 I like coffee.

00:00:47.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:55.460 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:58.520 It's better than a vaccination.

00:00:59.980 It's better than ivermectin.

00:01:01.240 It's better than lots of things.

00:01:03.960 Go.

00:01:08.200 Ah, sublime.

00:01:12.460 Savor it.

00:01:13.920 Savor it.

00:01:15.840 Stop and smell the coffee beans or whatever you got going there.

00:01:20.180 All right, so I have to ask this.

00:01:22.440 At the end of yesterday's live stream, I gave you a tip for removing foods from your diet and sulfites in particular.

00:01:32.060 Has anybody else discovered that they do have an allergy to sulfides or sulfites?

00:01:39.680 I'm seeing some more people here.

00:01:41.620 I've got a feeling it might be massive.

00:01:43.520 Could it be that, have you noticed that there's a asthma?

00:01:49.480 I need an update on this, but the last I knew, there was this huge uptick in asthma in adults in the United States.

00:02:00.340 Can somebody fact check that for me?

00:02:02.760 I know that was true a while ago, you know, years ago, that there was this giant unexplained uptick in asthma.

00:02:10.060 And it took me decades to find out it was that additive that was getting me.

00:02:16.420 What if it's just the additive?

00:02:18.700 What if that explains everything?

00:02:20.660 Because most asthma is either triggered by exercise or allergies.

00:02:26.580 And if there's a food additive that got to some percentage of the public and caused them to have allergies,

00:02:35.280 that would trigger your asthma.

00:02:37.260 So could it be a food allergy is the reason that the asthma spiked?

00:02:44.560 I'm going to say maybe.

00:02:46.400 Just a guess.

00:02:47.740 But speculatively, maybe.

00:02:49.800 Let me tell you something that a system I've been using on Twitter,

00:02:54.000 that's one of the best things that I ever came up with.

00:02:57.080 You've heard it before, but I just want to reinforce it so you can use it yourself.

00:03:00.600 If somebody comes after you personally on Twitter, you know, they're not criticizing the argument,

00:03:08.000 they're calling you stupid or, you know, just some personal insult.

00:03:12.020 Before you respond, before you respond, because you're going to want to insult them back right away,

00:03:18.920 check the profile.

00:03:19.980 And see if it's somebody who works in the arts.

00:03:25.380 Because ever since I started doing that and then sharing it with you,

00:03:28.840 you'll find that people who work in the arts go for the ad hominem.

00:03:33.420 I don't know exactly why.

00:03:35.860 It could be a combination of things.

00:03:37.500 One, it could be they don't have the analytical skills to go at it a different way.

00:03:41.220 But two, it could be they don't have the same distinction between reality and fantasy.

00:03:47.100 In other words, it might not, you know, matter to them so much if you're right.

00:03:51.880 It just matters that they're mad at you because you disagree.

00:03:55.340 And so I think there's also a performance element to it.

00:04:01.520 That people insulting, especially somebody who's, you know, in the public eye.

00:04:05.580 When people insult me, I think there's always a performance element to it.

00:04:08.640 That has nothing to do with me specifically.

00:04:11.720 And so as soon as I see that it's somebody in the arts, I completely discount it.

00:04:18.360 Because I just say, oh, that's just them.

00:04:21.480 That's just them.

00:04:22.700 That's just them being them.

00:04:24.520 Because the moment you think it's about you, you're going to be mad.

00:04:30.200 It's not about you.

00:04:31.840 It's about them.

00:04:33.220 It's about the performance they want to put on.

00:04:35.480 It's about them dealing with their own feelings and emotion.

00:04:38.560 And the number of times that I get insulted and then I check and, oh, it's an artist.

00:04:45.160 It's a writer or it's a visual artist of some kind.

00:04:49.060 Often they work in Hollywood.

00:04:50.260 Yeah, I'll tell you, the Hollywood writers are absolutely the worst.

00:04:58.080 They're the ones who come after me the most.

00:04:59.700 Because they hate me also because I make money writing.

00:05:03.020 And if you're a writer, you really hate people who make money writing.

00:05:06.100 98% of them do because 98% of writers don't make much money writing.

00:05:12.720 So that's my advice to you.

00:05:14.780 Now, did you all see the Elon Musk response to Elizabeth Warren on Twitter?

00:05:19.820 If you haven't seen it, it's one for the ages.

00:05:22.600 So on the same day that Elon Musk becomes Time Person of the Year,

00:05:29.760 Elon Musk proved to us why he is the best choice they've ever made for the Time Person of the Year.

00:05:36.280 If he wasn't already Time Person of the Year,

00:05:39.420 you'd have to give him some consideration just based on this tweet response.

00:05:43.860 That alone, if he'd never fired a rocket into space or become the richest person in the world.

00:05:50.940 Or the country, I guess.

00:05:53.480 So Elizabeth Warren decides to use Elon Musk as her, I don't know,

00:05:59.860 there's some word for it.

00:06:01.480 If you just use somebody as your example, I guess.

00:06:05.720 But I'm looking for a smarter sounding word.

00:06:09.020 And she says, let's change the rigged tax code

00:06:12.260 so the Person of the Year, meaning Elon Musk,

00:06:15.400 will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else.

00:06:23.800 What?

00:06:27.340 What?

00:06:29.180 Freeloading?

00:06:30.700 Elon Musk?

00:06:32.280 He's like single-handedly solving the biggest problems in the world for our country.

00:06:38.180 Elon Musk, I would say, is the reason that battery technology is advancing so much.

00:06:47.520 I mean, Tesla's got to be the big driver of showing that that market exists, etc.

00:06:52.940 And, of course, battery storage will be one of the key technologies of the future.

00:06:58.120 He's taking us to space, better than NASA was doing,

00:07:02.100 the most important strategic thing in the history of,

00:07:05.560 well, the entire history of the United States.

00:07:08.800 Controlling space and having space competence first,

00:07:13.820 nothing's more important than that.

00:07:15.860 So Elon Musk is doing, like, the work that even our government can do.

00:07:19.820 It's so important.

00:07:21.420 And she's, like, calling him a freeloader.

00:07:23.900 So Elon Musk, who also is the only marketing for Tesla,

00:07:30.480 which is also a wonderful fact,

00:07:33.120 that he's so good at getting attention

00:07:35.320 that he doesn't need to do marketing.

00:07:37.860 There's nobody who doesn't know him.

00:07:39.440 You know, everybody's following him.

00:07:41.300 He's the person of the year,

00:07:42.880 time person of the year.

00:07:43.840 So it's the best marketing I've ever seen.

00:07:47.280 I've never seen anybody do marketing better than this.

00:07:49.660 Have you?

00:07:49.960 I mean, Apple was pretty great, but they spent money on it.

00:07:54.220 He spends no money,

00:07:55.960 and he gets the same bang for the buck as Apple does.

00:07:59.140 I think he's the best marketer of all time.

00:08:04.280 I mean, is that too much?

00:08:07.720 There's nobody else who spends zero

00:08:09.360 and gets this consistently, right?

00:08:13.060 So I think you could make an argument

00:08:14.380 he's the best marketer who ever lived,

00:08:17.820 if you're just looking at the numbers.

00:08:20.960 Anyway, so after Elizabeth Warren tries to dunk on Elon Musk,

00:08:26.460 which is literally the worst idea

00:08:29.120 anybody ever had in the world,

00:08:31.420 Elon, his first reaction tweet was just this,

00:08:35.360 stop projecting.

00:08:37.960 Now, of course, that one's, you know,

00:08:40.760 it doesn't really hit the mark.

00:08:42.900 It's just, you know, just sort of like a warning shot.

00:08:45.660 He followed it up soon after with another tweet.

00:08:48.160 He said,

00:08:49.780 you remind me of when I was a kid

00:08:52.340 with my friend's angry mom

00:08:54.080 would just randomly yell at everyone for no reason.

00:08:56.980 Oh, my God.

00:09:06.420 Now, it's not that he wrote it like a joke, per se,

00:09:12.480 but it's the combination of who he is

00:09:15.340 and who she is and what she did

00:09:18.140 that makes this so wonderful.

00:09:20.500 because as soon as he says it,

00:09:23.100 you can see it.

00:09:24.280 That's what makes it so powerful

00:09:25.560 because Elizabeth Warren does have sort of a,

00:09:29.700 she does have sort of an angry mom persona.

00:09:32.980 And when you hear the richest man in the world

00:09:36.400 call it out, like, like the topic is taxes.

00:09:40.660 So instead of talking about tax rates,

00:09:43.660 he calls her out for being,

00:09:45.640 like his friend's angry mom,

00:09:47.720 and you can't stop seeing it.

00:09:49.440 The trouble is, this is a Trump-like attack.

00:09:53.160 As soon as you hear that she looks like

00:09:56.460 your friend's angry mom,

00:09:58.080 good luck ever seeing her another way again.

00:10:02.940 This is pure low-energy Jeb-level quality stuff.

00:10:12.240 So I'll never see her as anything but

00:10:14.620 Elon Musk's friend's angry mom.

00:10:18.400 But then he's not done.

00:10:22.120 He's got one more tweet in him.

00:10:24.280 He's not done.

00:10:25.800 The next tweet, his follow-up is,

00:10:28.080 please don't call the manager on me, Senator Karen.

00:10:31.440 And I'm like...

00:10:33.440 Oh, God.

00:10:39.020 The fact that...

00:10:40.440 Somebody...

00:10:51.440 Somebody who must have been a Democrat

00:10:54.780 tweeted in that, that Elon Musk,

00:10:58.340 you know, he has all this money,

00:10:59.440 he should hire a professional

00:11:01.140 to write his tweets for him.

00:11:03.780 And I thought to myself,

00:11:05.140 I don't know any professional

00:11:06.520 who could write a tweet this well,

00:11:08.100 except for Trump,

00:11:09.620 but I don't think he's for hire.

00:11:11.240 This is like the best set of tweets

00:11:13.020 I've ever seen.

00:11:14.140 I mean, I'm exaggerating a little bit,

00:11:15.540 but you can't do better than this.

00:11:18.140 You can't do better than this.

00:11:19.240 This is peak tweeting right here.

00:11:21.180 He's the richest man in the world,

00:11:23.740 the number one best marketer of all time,

00:11:25.880 and damn it,

00:11:26.920 he can tweet better than everybody.

00:11:29.180 It's probably not a coincidence.

00:11:31.120 He might be smart or something.

00:11:34.320 Rumor has it.

00:11:35.880 Anyway,

00:11:37.240 I don't know.

00:11:38.720 This could not be more...

00:11:39.920 I've never seen a more complete

00:11:41.980 takedown of a politician.

00:11:44.520 He basically ended her.

00:11:46.340 I mean,

00:11:49.980 seriously,

00:11:51.120 this is Bush-level takedown,

00:11:53.900 you know,

00:11:54.160 with Trump taking out Jeb Bush.

00:11:57.020 This is just wonderful.

00:11:59.100 And then later,

00:11:59.840 he followed it up.

00:12:00.480 I didn't copy that tweet,

00:12:01.520 but he noted that

00:12:02.440 in all likelihood

00:12:03.960 that Elon Musk

00:12:06.460 will pay more taxes this year

00:12:08.560 than any human has ever paid

00:12:11.500 this year,

00:12:14.900 at least in the United States.

00:12:16.760 He's going to pay more taxes

00:12:18.120 just this year

00:12:19.040 than any human has ever paid.

00:12:22.620 Now,

00:12:23.180 I assume that's related

00:12:24.100 to his selling his stock,

00:12:27.400 because he agreed

00:12:28.040 that he would sell

00:12:28.620 10% of his stock

00:12:30.080 or something in that range.

00:12:31.740 So that creates an enormous,

00:12:34.380 I think something like,

00:12:35.180 I don't know,

00:12:37.060 what,

00:12:37.720 a $3 or $4 billion tax bill?

00:12:40.940 Does anybody know

00:12:41.580 what his taxes would look like

00:12:42.980 just based on what stock he sold?

00:12:46.340 Somewhere in that range, right?

00:12:47.800 A few billion.

00:12:49.320 So when you go to pay your taxes,

00:12:51.660 just realize that

00:12:52.900 he's paying a few billion.

00:12:55.400 Yeah, it would be capital gains,

00:12:56.620 it would probably be 25%

00:12:57.860 of whatever he sells,

00:12:59.960 $2.5 billion maybe.

00:13:01.700 Something in that range.

00:13:02.760 Anyway,

00:13:04.980 that was fun.

00:13:07.600 So the January 6th committee,

00:13:11.320 they have so much nothing

00:13:14.120 that they're trying to turn nothing

00:13:16.160 into something.

00:13:17.180 So yesterday,

00:13:18.540 I kept reading the headlines.

00:13:21.940 They were trying to make something

00:13:23.980 out of the nothing

00:13:25.500 that I guess three Fox News hosts

00:13:29.260 had texted Mark Meadows

00:13:31.180 on January 6th

00:13:32.460 and asked him to ask the president

00:13:33.960 to call off the protests.

00:13:36.880 But the way that the stories were written,

00:13:40.060 it was as if they'd found a bombshell.

00:13:43.520 As if this was a big breaking story.

00:13:46.740 If they finally found the smoking gun.

00:13:48.820 What?

00:13:51.620 There's literally nothing there.

00:13:53.920 What are we supposed to take from it?

00:13:55.420 That some Fox News hosts

00:13:57.420 knew how to text Mark Meadows?

00:14:00.240 No surprise there.

00:14:02.380 Right?

00:14:03.580 Are we supposed to take from it

00:14:05.600 that Hannity and Laura Ingram

00:14:09.640 were in on the plot?

00:14:12.660 Because their texts say the opposite.

00:14:15.240 It's pretty clear from the text

00:14:17.280 that nobody at Fox News

00:14:19.220 had been aware

00:14:20.880 that there was some kind

00:14:21.820 of an insurrection planned.

00:14:24.200 Now let me ask you this.

00:14:25.940 So most of my viewers are,

00:14:27.960 you know,

00:14:28.180 you lean at least a little bit right.

00:14:30.680 And this is one of those blind spots

00:14:32.580 on the left.

00:14:33.220 Let me ask you this.

00:14:35.720 If there had been an actual planned

00:14:38.120 at any level insurrection

00:14:41.300 in which Trump was part of the planning,

00:14:44.260 which would mean

00:14:45.720 some constellation of AIDS

00:14:47.840 were part of the planning,

00:14:49.440 do you think that Hannity

00:14:50.760 would not know that?

00:14:54.540 Right?

00:14:56.140 Seriously.

00:14:57.000 If you know anything

00:14:58.120 about the world,

00:14:59.740 or certainly anything

00:15:00.800 about the conservative ecosystem,

00:15:03.800 you know,

00:15:04.000 who knows who,

00:15:04.800 who's connected to who,

00:15:06.400 tell me the odds

00:15:07.520 that Hannity and Laura Ingram

00:15:09.700 would be unaware

00:15:11.660 of an insurrection plot

00:15:13.880 if there was an insurrection plot.

00:15:16.680 I mean, seriously.

00:15:18.700 Hannity?

00:15:20.260 Hannity would talk

00:15:21.140 to the president

00:15:21.620 like every day.

00:15:23.380 Do you think the president

00:15:24.420 would have even attempted,

00:15:27.720 wait for it,

00:15:28.820 do you think Trump,

00:15:30.420 given who he is,

00:15:32.600 his knowledge of,

00:15:33.880 you know,

00:15:34.740 the media,

00:15:35.560 how things work,

00:15:37.080 do you think that Trump

00:15:38.440 would have planned

00:15:39.700 an actual insurrection

00:15:41.220 without talking to Hannity

00:15:43.580 to find out

00:15:45.020 how Hannity would handle it?

00:15:48.340 Nope.

00:15:49.740 Because there's no way

00:15:50.860 an insurrection works

00:15:51.840 if Fox News

00:15:52.620 doesn't go along with it,

00:15:54.000 right?

00:15:55.100 Am I right?

00:15:56.480 Everybody on the right

00:15:57.680 knows that.

00:15:59.060 The president knows that.

00:16:00.940 If Fox News

00:16:02.060 just turned hard

00:16:03.020 against the president,

00:16:04.240 let's say there was

00:16:04.920 an insurrection,

00:16:06.220 Fox would have turned on him

00:16:09.100 and the whole thing

00:16:10.760 would fall apart

00:16:11.360 and the right would turn on him,

00:16:12.520 just not Fox,

00:16:13.500 but the whole right

00:16:14.140 would turn on him.

00:16:15.500 And you don't think

00:16:16.960 that the president

00:16:17.580 was smart enough

00:16:18.480 to check that out first?

00:16:21.160 Say, hey,

00:16:22.260 Sean,

00:16:23.060 I'm just noodling

00:16:24.820 with this idea.

00:16:26.540 How would you take it

00:16:27.520 if I did that?

00:16:29.600 Now, if Hannity said,

00:16:31.200 I'm all in,

00:16:32.480 let's overthrow

00:16:33.500 the Constitution,

00:16:36.360 well, that would be

00:16:37.140 a different story,

00:16:38.040 but obviously

00:16:38.680 the opposite happened.

00:16:40.480 He was not in on anything,

00:16:42.600 and as soon as he saw

00:16:43.520 something developing,

00:16:45.100 he panicked,

00:16:45.820 not panicked,

00:16:46.480 that's,

00:16:47.060 I hate when people

00:16:47.940 say that about anybody,

00:16:49.520 he immediately acted,

00:16:51.260 no panic,

00:16:52.460 he acted as he should,

00:16:54.980 as a patriot,

00:16:56.300 as a citizen,

00:16:57.040 and he did what he could do

00:16:59.500 to try to make it stop.

00:17:01.720 Here's what the story

00:17:02.840 should have been.

00:17:04.880 Fox News hosts

00:17:06.060 highly responsible patriots

00:17:08.420 act immediately

00:17:09.880 to stop trouble.

00:17:12.380 Now, they were saying things like,

00:17:13.980 it looks bad for our side,

00:17:15.220 and that was obvious,

00:17:16.660 but still,

00:17:18.900 they acted as patriots,

00:17:21.180 am I wrong?

00:17:21.960 I mean, you could dislike

00:17:22.920 them for whatever opinions

00:17:25.580 you disagree with,

00:17:26.660 blah, blah, blah,

00:17:27.140 but in this instance,

00:17:30.400 the Fox News hosts

00:17:31.440 were just pure patriots,

00:17:32.860 in my opinion.

00:17:33.900 I think they just said

00:17:34.840 they saw trouble,

00:17:35.760 and they tried to stop it.

00:17:37.620 So, that's the story,

00:17:39.280 and somehow,

00:17:40.040 the news was trying

00:17:40.900 to present it like

00:17:41.760 there was some big

00:17:42.860 breaking thing

00:17:43.600 that was negative

00:17:44.320 for the right,

00:17:46.020 and it was really

00:17:46.740 exactly the opposite.

00:17:48.980 It was very complimentary

00:17:50.160 to the right,

00:17:51.560 you know,

00:17:52.000 within this context.

00:17:53.000 And, yeah,

00:17:56.840 and it was self-preservation.

00:17:58.820 Of course,

00:17:59.280 it was self-preservation.

00:18:00.780 But,

00:18:01.300 what is the situation

00:18:02.500 in which a patriot

00:18:03.600 is preserving,

00:18:06.240 you know,

00:18:06.540 themselves,

00:18:07.120 and it's not the same

00:18:07.820 as the country?

00:18:08.600 I mean,

00:18:09.020 the country's interests

00:18:10.040 and their own

00:18:11.340 were matched.

00:18:12.800 So, you know,

00:18:13.560 if you say it's self-interest,

00:18:14.680 that's true,

00:18:15.700 but do you think

00:18:16.580 they wanted a riot

00:18:17.480 at the Capitol?

00:18:18.860 I don't think

00:18:19.260 they wanted that either.

00:18:20.380 You can want two things.

00:18:22.160 It's okay to want

00:18:23.000 two things.

00:18:24.900 All right.

00:18:30.260 So,

00:18:30.960 this whole

00:18:31.420 ivermectin thing

00:18:32.480 won't go away,

00:18:33.840 and here's just

00:18:35.580 a couple of things

00:18:37.360 that people said

00:18:38.800 about it.

00:18:40.480 Anatoly Lubarsky

00:18:41.720 was pointing out

00:18:42.560 that hydroxychloroquine

00:18:44.640 and ivermectin

00:18:45.740 both were widely

00:18:46.760 used in Peru

00:18:47.600 since the beginning

00:18:48.620 of the pandemic.

00:18:49.580 He said this

00:18:50.080 in a tweet.

00:18:51.500 And then he showed

00:18:52.220 some data that says

00:18:53.000 now Peru is leading

00:18:53.880 the world in deaths

00:18:54.780 per million

00:18:55.300 and excess deaths.

00:18:58.740 So,

00:18:59.220 I had asked,

00:18:59.800 is there any country

00:19:00.620 that just went,

00:19:01.720 you know,

00:19:02.200 wild with ivermectin

00:19:03.900 or hydroxychloroquine

00:19:05.300 and got a good result?

00:19:07.020 Well,

00:19:07.440 we know there's one

00:19:08.120 that used it heavily

00:19:09.760 and got a bad result.

00:19:11.000 Doesn't mean because of it.

00:19:13.280 Yeah,

00:19:13.720 we could have

00:19:14.240 also bad information

00:19:15.960 or something.

00:19:17.640 And then another doctor

00:19:19.060 was pointing out

00:19:19.840 and I only heard

00:19:21.740 this yesterday

00:19:22.340 but it sounds

00:19:22.880 about right,

00:19:24.220 that some trials

00:19:25.060 showing the effect,

00:19:26.780 at least ivermectin's

00:19:27.940 positive effects

00:19:28.980 for COVID

00:19:29.600 were either frauds,

00:19:31.720 so we do know

00:19:32.460 that some of the

00:19:32.980 ivermectin studies

00:19:33.980 were frauds,

00:19:34.860 not all of them,

00:19:36.040 but apparently

00:19:36.760 some of the biggest

00:19:37.660 benefit ones

00:19:39.220 were frauds

00:19:40.120 and that skews

00:19:40.920 the rest of them.

00:19:41.500 if you're doing

00:19:43.500 a meta-analysis

00:19:44.360 is skews the average.

00:19:46.440 But also,

00:19:48.100 it turns out

00:19:48.680 that some of the

00:19:49.500 benefits of ivermectin

00:19:50.720 could be explained

00:19:51.720 by co-infection

00:19:53.060 with worms.

00:19:54.580 In other words,

00:19:55.280 it's a bad deal

00:19:56.360 to have worms in you

00:19:58.380 at the same time

00:19:59.160 you get infected

00:20:00.080 with COVID

00:20:00.600 because you get

00:20:01.720 a double whammy.

00:20:03.560 So it makes

00:20:04.760 perfect sense

00:20:05.500 that if you treated

00:20:06.400 the worms

00:20:07.020 with ivermectin

00:20:08.500 and that made

00:20:10.280 a difference,

00:20:11.500 that that would

00:20:11.980 seem to have

00:20:12.720 an effect

00:20:13.140 on the COVID

00:20:14.020 recovery

00:20:14.520 because you go

00:20:15.680 from two big

00:20:16.300 problems to one.

00:20:18.460 So that could

00:20:19.160 be blinding us

00:20:20.100 to the actual

00:20:20.860 effects of

00:20:21.880 ivermectin

00:20:23.000 on COVID.

00:20:24.980 Now,

00:20:25.660 I know that

00:20:26.520 you don't believe

00:20:27.160 this.

00:20:28.600 Yeah,

00:20:28.880 somebody's saying

00:20:29.340 Japan,

00:20:29.960 lowest case

00:20:30.640 in the world.

00:20:31.760 Do you know

00:20:33.120 that there's

00:20:34.100 no bad cases

00:20:35.180 in any Asian

00:20:35.860 country?

00:20:36.920 Can somebody

00:20:37.400 confirm that?

00:20:39.000 Can I get

00:20:39.380 a confirmation

00:20:39.900 that there's

00:20:40.320 no bad

00:20:40.980 case in

00:20:42.020 any Asian

00:20:42.680 country?

00:20:43.520 So if you're

00:20:44.020 looking at

00:20:44.480 any Western

00:20:45.100 country,

00:20:46.520 I'm not going

00:20:47.140 to count

00:20:47.360 India,

00:20:47.960 so I'm going

00:20:48.280 to count,

00:20:49.660 I'm going to

00:20:50.020 count,

00:20:51.280 yeah,

00:20:51.620 India is

00:20:52.320 part of the

00:20:53.760 region,

00:20:54.520 but of,

00:20:55.480 let's say,

00:20:55.940 of Asiatic

00:20:56.880 people,

00:21:00.500 where they're,

00:21:01.740 you know,

00:21:02.000 they have a,

00:21:02.800 let's say,

00:21:03.580 what's the best

00:21:04.280 thing?

00:21:06.200 Ethnically

00:21:06.680 Asian?

00:21:07.620 Because that

00:21:08.220 would not be

00:21:08.620 the case for

00:21:09.160 Indians,

00:21:09.580 right?

00:21:14.280 And part

00:21:14.900 of the

00:21:15.140 speculation is,

00:21:16.080 and by the

00:21:16.400 way,

00:21:16.620 India would

00:21:17.200 be a

00:21:18.120 counterexample

00:21:18.780 to this.

00:21:19.480 Some of the

00:21:19.960 speculation is

00:21:20.660 there might

00:21:20.960 have been

00:21:21.140 some prior

00:21:21.720 infection that

00:21:22.660 was more

00:21:23.320 Asian-centric,

00:21:25.660 and so a lot

00:21:26.100 of people have

00:21:26.620 some prior

00:21:27.120 infection in

00:21:28.420 a related

00:21:29.000 cousin coronavirus

00:21:30.500 that gives

00:21:31.380 them some

00:21:31.720 protection.

00:21:32.940 So that's

00:21:33.280 one possible.

00:21:34.320 Because a lot

00:21:35.420 of the Asian

00:21:35.780 countries are

00:21:36.340 handling it

00:21:36.840 differently.

00:21:38.320 And if

00:21:38.600 they're handling

00:21:39.020 it differently

00:21:39.660 and all

00:21:40.040 getting a

00:21:40.380 pretty good

00:21:40.740 result,

00:21:42.240 there must

00:21:42.900 be something

00:21:43.420 else going

00:21:43.960 on,

00:21:44.320 right?

00:21:45.840 But Japan

00:21:46.760 is not a

00:21:47.380 story of

00:21:47.820 ivermectin.

00:21:48.960 That's just

00:21:49.560 not true.

00:21:51.580 As far as I

00:21:52.520 know,

00:21:53.300 I could be

00:21:53.760 wrong.

00:21:55.500 But here's

00:21:58.800 my take on

00:21:59.380 it.

00:22:00.540 So would

00:22:02.240 you agree

00:22:02.660 with me that

00:22:03.300 no matter how

00:22:03.980 many smart

00:22:05.060 people,

00:22:05.440 no matter

00:22:07.940 how many

00:22:08.360 smart people

00:22:09.000 are telling

00:22:09.540 me that

00:22:10.080 ivermectin

00:22:10.760 works,

00:22:11.620 I can't

00:22:12.280 say for

00:22:12.660 sure it

00:22:12.960 doesn't.

00:22:14.440 Would you

00:22:14.820 say that's

00:22:15.240 fair?

00:22:16.400 If I were

00:22:17.140 to tell you

00:22:17.620 I am

00:22:18.040 positive this

00:22:19.180 doesn't work,

00:22:20.540 I think you

00:22:21.160 could call me

00:22:21.680 an idiot and

00:22:23.220 that should

00:22:23.640 stick.

00:22:25.000 Fair?

00:22:26.300 If I were

00:22:26.940 to tell you

00:22:27.540 that definitely

00:22:28.580 doesn't work,

00:22:30.300 I think you

00:22:30.840 could call me

00:22:31.340 an idiot for

00:22:32.740 being certain,

00:22:34.120 just for being

00:22:34.760 certain.

00:22:35.620 But suppose I

00:22:36.360 told you this,

00:22:37.480 see if this is

00:22:38.140 fair, the

00:22:39.320 longer we go

00:22:40.280 without a

00:22:41.080 confirmation,

00:22:42.380 the kind that

00:22:43.020 even the top

00:22:43.780 experts say,

00:22:44.420 oh yeah,

00:22:44.800 that's confirmation,

00:22:45.980 the longer we

00:22:46.820 go without that

00:22:47.440 confirmation,

00:22:48.100 the less likely

00:22:48.860 there's something

00:22:50.020 there.

00:22:51.740 That's just my

00:22:52.640 general feeling

00:22:53.300 about it.

00:22:53.700 Same with

00:22:54.120 hydroxychloroquine.

00:22:55.760 We've gone

00:22:56.480 long enough now

00:22:57.440 that if something

00:22:58.120 was there,

00:22:58.940 I would be

00:22:59.820 super,

00:23:00.540 super surprised.

00:23:02.180 Not 100%,

00:23:03.200 right?

00:23:04.500 I'm not even

00:23:04.980 100% on

00:23:05.660 hydroxychloroquine

00:23:06.600 and I think

00:23:07.100 that's been

00:23:08.560 more disproved

00:23:10.020 than just

00:23:11.000 about anything

00:23:11.520 by time.

00:23:13.860 So here's

00:23:15.940 my take on

00:23:16.560 this.

00:23:17.560 There's the

00:23:18.520 belief,

00:23:19.220 the people

00:23:19.540 following Dr.

00:23:20.500 McCullough

00:23:20.880 especially,

00:23:21.900 that there

00:23:22.460 might have

00:23:22.720 been some

00:23:23.280 early treatments

00:23:24.980 that the

00:23:25.920 big medicine

00:23:27.580 machine

00:23:28.300 kind of

00:23:30.900 use some

00:23:32.020 fake news

00:23:32.680 and some

00:23:34.100 shenanigans

00:23:34.660 to make us

00:23:35.300 think that

00:23:35.720 the alternatives

00:23:36.740 to vaccinations

00:23:37.560 don't work.

00:23:40.640 Okay?

00:23:41.360 So do you

00:23:42.280 believe that

00:23:43.540 big medicine,

00:23:44.600 whatever that

00:23:45.260 means,

00:23:46.020 or the big

00:23:46.460 medicine machine

00:23:47.280 which might

00:23:47.820 include,

00:23:48.380 you know,

00:23:48.660 I don't know,

00:23:49.080 the news

00:23:49.720 and the

00:23:50.700 government

00:23:50.980 somewhat,

00:23:52.220 do you think

00:23:52.680 that the

00:23:53.000 big medicine

00:23:53.500 machine

00:23:54.200 suppressed

00:23:55.480 ivermectin

00:23:57.240 just because

00:24:00.340 they didn't

00:24:00.940 want competition?

00:24:03.920 Maybe.

00:24:05.240 Here's my

00:24:05.900 take on it.

00:24:06.780 I don't think

00:24:07.460 that's the

00:24:07.880 case,

00:24:08.680 but let me

00:24:10.000 get on your

00:24:10.900 side for a

00:24:11.560 moment,

00:24:11.800 if I may.

00:24:13.040 If it ever

00:24:13.740 came out,

00:24:15.200 if it ever

00:24:15.880 came out,

00:24:16.920 that anybody

00:24:17.540 in a

00:24:18.280 professional

00:24:19.680 field

00:24:21.760 intentionally,

00:24:24.160 and the

00:24:24.720 key word

00:24:25.140 here is

00:24:25.460 intentionally,

00:24:26.160 with data,

00:24:27.240 if it ever

00:24:28.240 came out

00:24:28.660 that somebody

00:24:29.140 intentionally

00:24:29.880 killed a

00:24:31.520 treatment that

00:24:33.680 we knew to

00:24:34.300 work, or

00:24:34.860 had a high

00:24:35.400 likelihood to

00:24:35.960 work, I

00:24:37.580 would say

00:24:37.880 that's got

00:24:38.620 to be the

00:24:38.920 death sentence.

00:24:40.840 I think

00:24:41.500 that we

00:24:41.820 have to

00:24:42.120 treat big

00:24:44.140 pharma

00:24:44.720 misdeeds as

00:24:49.000 mass murder,

00:24:50.000 if it's done

00:24:50.700 intentionally.

00:24:51.460 If it's

00:24:51.940 negligence,

00:24:53.980 that's

00:24:54.500 something else.

00:24:54.900 But if we

00:24:56.480 could ever

00:24:56.900 show that

00:24:57.800 somebody knew

00:24:58.680 they were

00:24:59.820 doing something

00:25:00.400 to manipulate

00:25:01.120 public opinion,

00:25:02.520 or even

00:25:03.000 medical opinion,

00:25:03.900 or government

00:25:05.120 opinion, if we

00:25:06.420 could confirm

00:25:07.020 that somebody

00:25:07.520 did that in a

00:25:08.540 way that was

00:25:09.520 just to make

00:25:10.160 money, and

00:25:11.840 we knew that

00:25:12.400 it cost people

00:25:13.540 their lives,

00:25:14.580 what's the

00:25:15.400 penalty for that?

00:25:16.600 It should be

00:25:17.360 death.

00:25:18.580 Does anybody

00:25:19.400 disagree?

00:25:20.160 Because it

00:25:21.020 should be

00:25:21.360 about the

00:25:21.920 same as

00:25:22.300 terrorism, and

00:25:24.180 I think that

00:25:24.620 should be a

00:25:25.000 death sentence.

00:25:26.900 Because it's

00:25:27.700 mass murder, and

00:25:28.980 it's intentional

00:25:29.640 under the

00:25:30.600 hypothetical.

00:25:32.720 Now, let me

00:25:33.460 tell you that I

00:25:34.080 don't have any

00:25:34.640 information that

00:25:35.240 anything like

00:25:35.660 that has ever

00:25:36.120 happened.

00:25:38.580 Here's what I

00:25:39.400 think does

00:25:40.360 happen.

00:25:42.360 Now, here's a

00:25:43.300 view of the

00:25:44.420 world that I

00:25:45.300 suspect is

00:25:47.180 annoyingly

00:25:47.880 accurate.

00:25:48.300 which is

00:25:50.680 that people

00:25:51.460 only know

00:25:52.360 what they

00:25:52.860 decide they

00:25:53.480 want to

00:25:53.900 know, right?

00:25:55.160 So let's

00:25:55.680 say you

00:25:56.060 were a

00:25:56.520 vaccine

00:25:57.180 executive, and

00:25:59.940 you were

00:26:00.200 trying to

00:26:00.540 make billions

00:26:01.300 of dollars,

00:26:02.160 a trillion

00:26:02.500 dollars on

00:26:03.200 vaccines.

00:26:04.720 And somebody

00:26:05.180 came to you

00:26:05.700 and said,

00:26:06.440 well, what

00:26:07.020 are we

00:26:07.240 saying about

00:26:07.780 ivermectin?

00:26:08.760 There's all

00:26:09.260 these meta

00:26:10.000 studies that

00:26:10.640 show that it

00:26:11.200 works, and

00:26:13.140 a lot of

00:26:14.160 serious people

00:26:14.980 say it

00:26:15.400 works.

00:26:15.700 Yeah,

00:26:18.340 OxyContin's

00:26:19.420 a good

00:26:19.720 cautionary

00:26:20.580 tale, you're

00:26:20.960 right.

00:26:22.520 So what's

00:26:23.240 the more

00:26:23.520 likely thing

00:26:24.820 that an

00:26:25.600 executive of

00:26:26.440 a drug

00:26:26.800 company would

00:26:27.320 say?

00:26:28.220 Well, if

00:26:29.260 it were me

00:26:29.820 and I

00:26:30.420 were a

00:26:30.720 weasel, I'd

00:26:31.880 say, don't

00:26:33.220 show me any

00:26:33.860 ivermectin

00:26:34.460 data, ever.

00:26:37.920 Until

00:26:38.400 somebody

00:26:39.040 official says

00:26:39.820 it's proven

00:26:40.340 and it

00:26:40.700 works, which

00:26:41.240 hasn't

00:26:41.520 happened, I'm

00:26:43.740 going to say

00:26:44.180 it's not

00:26:44.660 proven and it

00:26:45.220 doesn't work

00:26:45.740 and so we

00:26:46.160 better get

00:26:46.560 these

00:26:46.760 vaccinations.

00:26:48.560 Now, is

00:26:50.000 that a

00:26:50.260 crime?

00:26:52.920 Because they're

00:26:53.840 just willfully

00:26:54.740 keeping

00:26:56.220 themselves away

00:26:57.020 from a

00:26:57.400 certain kind

00:26:57.860 of information

00:26:58.520 because they

00:27:00.240 feel that they

00:27:00.820 have enough.

00:27:02.480 Not exactly.

00:27:04.740 So I think

00:27:05.460 that you can

00:27:05.860 get a situation

00:27:06.500 where a lot

00:27:07.180 of people

00:27:07.500 would be

00:27:07.880 making choices

00:27:08.700 that coincidentally

00:27:10.820 are good for

00:27:12.180 their financial

00:27:13.560 futures and

00:27:15.100 may be bad

00:27:15.720 for the

00:27:15.980 world.

00:27:17.320 I'm just

00:27:17.900 going to say

00:27:18.240 that I don't

00:27:18.720 think if you

00:27:19.840 look like you're

00:27:20.520 going to make

00:27:20.820 billions of

00:27:21.400 dollars from

00:27:21.880 vaccinations,

00:27:22.900 you're not

00:27:23.540 going to dig

00:27:24.120 too hard to

00:27:24.900 find an

00:27:25.320 alternative to

00:27:26.040 it.

00:27:27.040 And you're

00:27:27.360 not going to

00:27:27.700 say anything

00:27:28.120 good about

00:27:28.640 it.

00:27:29.220 And if you're

00:27:29.720 talking to a

00:27:30.300 politician,

00:27:30.940 you're going

00:27:31.160 to say,

00:27:31.440 look, vaccines

00:27:32.880 will probably

00:27:33.400 work because

00:27:34.060 that's who you

00:27:34.600 work for.

00:27:35.880 But ivermectin,

00:27:37.300 that's not your

00:27:38.200 product.

00:27:39.020 So you say,

00:27:40.160 you know, a lot

00:27:41.000 of people are

00:27:41.380 warning against it.

00:27:42.200 A lot of

00:27:42.900 people are

00:27:43.220 calling it

00:27:43.560 horse medicine.

00:27:44.220 You could

00:27:44.460 just talk it

00:27:45.100 down without

00:27:46.240 saying anything

00:27:46.900 untrue.

00:27:48.760 My suspicion is

00:27:50.260 that the, you

00:27:52.040 know, big

00:27:53.140 medicine machine

00:27:54.000 did try to

00:27:54.760 kill these

00:27:55.180 things, these

00:27:55.800 competing things,

00:27:57.020 but that they

00:27:58.040 also thought they

00:27:58.860 probably didn't

00:27:59.440 work.

00:28:01.460 So I can't

00:28:02.760 take the side

00:28:03.360 that says they

00:28:04.300 knew they

00:28:04.700 worked and they

00:28:05.560 tried to suppress

00:28:06.540 them anyway.

00:28:07.980 I haven't seen

00:28:08.800 anything like that.

00:28:09.620 Or the one

00:28:11.080 that says they

00:28:13.320 definitely don't

00:28:14.360 work, blah, blah,

00:28:15.780 because I don't

00:28:16.300 know.

00:28:17.200 So I'm on the

00:28:17.820 side that says

00:28:18.460 probably the

00:28:19.720 people who were

00:28:20.620 trying to suppress

00:28:22.100 it suspected it

00:28:23.220 might have worked,

00:28:24.140 but they were

00:28:24.800 using the fact

00:28:25.500 that it wasn't

00:28:26.000 proven to

00:28:27.740 further their

00:28:28.440 financial gain,

00:28:29.400 which is not

00:28:30.820 illegal.

00:28:31.800 I don't think

00:28:32.580 it's illegal.

00:28:33.180 It's more like

00:28:33.560 marketing,

00:28:34.480 unfortunately.

00:28:34.860 Now, there's

00:28:40.120 also the

00:28:41.060 belief, which I

00:28:43.940 see a lot, that

00:28:45.380 the real reason

00:28:46.040 that the cheaper

00:28:47.140 alternatives to

00:28:48.520 vaccinations were

00:28:49.420 not pursued is

00:28:50.380 that if they

00:28:50.980 existed, the

00:28:52.340 vaccines could

00:28:53.200 not get their

00:28:53.840 emergency

00:28:54.480 authorization.

00:28:55.700 How many of you

00:28:56.160 believe that

00:28:56.740 that's true?

00:28:59.140 Do you believe

00:29:00.000 it's true that

00:29:01.280 alternatives were

00:29:02.320 suppressed because

00:29:03.960 the medical

00:29:04.460 community wanted

00:29:05.660 vaccinations to

00:29:06.600 be the thing?

00:29:11.820 Here's a

00:29:12.420 perfectly good

00:29:13.060 study.

00:29:13.840 No, there's

00:29:14.340 no such thing

00:29:14.860 as a perfectly

00:29:15.380 good study,

00:29:16.620 Spectre.

00:29:18.180 Yeah, showing

00:29:19.000 me a study on

00:29:19.660 ivermectin isn't

00:29:20.440 going to have

00:29:21.400 any impact on

00:29:22.120 me because the

00:29:23.260 studies we know

00:29:24.100 are so often

00:29:24.920 fraudulent, I

00:29:25.660 just wouldn't

00:29:26.040 know what I'm

00:29:26.380 looking at.

00:29:27.420 Wouldn't know

00:29:28.020 if it was a

00:29:28.440 good study or

00:29:28.980 not.

00:29:30.760 All right, so

00:29:31.500 here's my take

00:29:32.820 on the belief

00:29:33.940 that we

00:29:34.980 couldn't get

00:29:35.460 an emergency

00:29:35.940 authorization for

00:29:37.160 vaccines if

00:29:38.480 we found that

00:29:39.380 there was an

00:29:40.400 alternative.

00:29:42.140 Who do you

00:29:42.860 think was

00:29:43.200 making that

00:29:43.640 decision?

00:29:45.300 Do you think

00:29:45.720 the Trump

00:29:46.300 administration was

00:29:48.180 presented with

00:29:48.940 this alternative?

00:29:49.800 Hey, Mr.

00:29:50.260 Trump, we

00:29:51.960 could not only

00:29:52.880 get vaccinations,

00:29:54.360 but we could be

00:29:55.560 treating the

00:29:56.060 heck out of

00:29:56.520 this with

00:29:57.000 these therapeutics

00:29:57.980 until the

00:29:59.080 vaccinations get

00:29:59.960 there, and

00:30:01.220 the only problem

00:30:01.820 is if they work,

00:30:03.240 we can't get the

00:30:03.900 emergency

00:30:04.340 authorization.

00:30:06.060 Mr.

00:30:06.700 President Trump,

00:30:07.560 so what do

00:30:08.020 we do?

00:30:09.460 Does Trump

00:30:10.020 say, oh,

00:30:11.340 damn, I

00:30:13.200 guess we'll

00:30:13.560 have to

00:30:13.940 suppress all

00:30:14.700 those excellent

00:30:15.400 treatments to

00:30:17.460 wait for the

00:30:17.940 vaccination?

00:30:19.380 Do you imagine

00:30:20.160 that's how that

00:30:20.720 conversation went?

00:30:23.980 Do you think

00:30:24.640 that Trump was

00:30:25.560 presented with

00:30:26.300 the choice of

00:30:27.540 totally good

00:30:28.700 therapeutics, and

00:30:30.580 that he said,

00:30:31.940 no, don't push

00:30:32.920 those, because

00:30:33.580 then the

00:30:34.080 emergency

00:30:34.500 authorization won't

00:30:35.560 work?

00:30:36.860 Does that sound

00:30:37.680 like something

00:30:38.080 Trump would

00:30:38.540 do?

00:30:43.380 Have you

00:30:43.980 ever fucking

00:30:44.920 met Trump?

00:30:47.200 No.

00:30:48.080 No.

00:30:48.600 No.

00:30:49.440 No.

00:30:50.360 Hold on.

00:30:51.060 Whoever's, I'm

00:30:52.580 going to get rid

00:30:53.040 of you for being

00:30:53.560 an asshole.

00:30:55.260 Top naivety

00:30:56.220 today.

00:30:57.280 See, that's the

00:30:58.040 kind of comment

00:30:59.960 that you're

00:31:01.040 either new to

00:31:01.920 me, or

00:31:02.720 you're just

00:31:04.600 an asshole.

00:31:06.220 All right.

00:31:08.300 I believe it

00:31:09.400 is impossible,

00:31:11.700 literally impossible

00:31:12.620 to imagine,

00:31:14.000 that President

00:31:16.100 Trump would

00:31:16.780 say, oh,

00:31:17.720 there's nothing

00:31:18.260 I can do when

00:31:19.540 he's handing

00:31:20.120 out executive

00:31:20.880 orders like

00:31:21.580 candy.

00:31:22.780 In the middle

00:31:23.500 of the pandemic,

00:31:25.300 Trump would

00:31:26.420 have said,

00:31:27.740 and I can't

00:31:28.320 read minds,

00:31:28.980 but I'm

00:31:29.200 pretty confident

00:31:29.920 about this

00:31:30.420 one, because

00:31:32.140 anybody would

00:31:32.720 have done

00:31:32.960 this.

00:31:34.020 Literally

00:31:34.500 anybody would

00:31:36.000 have said,

00:31:36.400 wait a minute,

00:31:37.160 the only thing

00:31:37.940 that's keeping

00:31:38.480 this from not

00:31:39.680 happening is

00:31:40.560 that there's

00:31:41.440 some rule?

00:31:43.040 Oh, give me

00:31:43.720 an executive

00:31:44.180 order, we'll

00:31:44.680 get rid of

00:31:45.020 that by this

00:31:45.740 afternoon.

00:31:47.160 Now, suppose

00:31:47.900 it wasn't

00:31:48.320 Trump himself.

00:31:50.320 Suppose Trump

00:31:50.940 never heard that

00:31:51.620 proposition, but

00:31:52.980 rather members

00:31:54.260 of staff heard

00:31:54.980 it.

00:31:55.180 was there

00:31:56.120 a member

00:31:56.440 of the

00:31:56.680 staff who

00:31:57.160 said, well,

00:31:58.200 I could

00:31:58.580 take this

00:31:59.060 idea to

00:31:59.580 the president

00:32:00.080 and it

00:32:01.380 would solve

00:32:01.820 the pandemic,

00:32:03.320 but I don't

00:32:05.280 think I want

00:32:05.820 to because I

00:32:07.180 want those

00:32:07.560 vaccinations.

00:32:08.980 Do you

00:32:09.420 think that

00:32:09.760 happened?

00:32:11.600 No.

00:32:12.440 So the part

00:32:12.960 of the story

00:32:13.440 that's clearly

00:32:14.140 missing is the

00:32:16.280 part where

00:32:16.720 somebody in

00:32:17.360 the administration

00:32:17.940 actually made

00:32:18.960 that decision.

00:32:20.900 Nobody would

00:32:21.540 make that

00:32:21.920 decision.

00:32:23.480 The vaccination

00:32:24.540 or the

00:32:25.260 pharma

00:32:26.620 companies might

00:32:27.280 make that

00:32:27.660 decision, but

00:32:28.720 they're not

00:32:29.000 in the

00:32:29.200 government.

00:32:30.360 You're telling

00:32:30.800 me that, I

00:32:32.500 don't know,

00:32:32.860 Trump and his

00:32:33.480 whole administration

00:32:34.280 were all

00:32:34.760 bribed by

00:32:35.840 big pharma to

00:32:37.500 ignore the

00:32:38.100 other treatments

00:32:38.780 when obviously

00:32:39.480 the other

00:32:39.920 treatments would

00:32:40.520 have made

00:32:41.240 Trump president

00:32:41.960 for a second

00:32:42.480 term.

00:32:43.320 You're telling

00:32:43.880 me Trump

00:32:44.260 would give

00:32:44.600 up a second

00:32:45.180 term just

00:32:47.000 so the

00:32:47.320 vaccinations

00:32:47.800 would be the

00:32:48.440 only thing.

00:32:48.880 It's not

00:32:50.440 good for

00:32:50.820 Trump.

00:32:51.780 It wouldn't

00:32:52.280 be good for

00:32:52.700 anybody on

00:32:53.220 his team.

00:32:54.440 So you'd

00:32:54.860 have to

00:32:55.280 assume that

00:32:56.540 Trump and

00:32:57.040 his entire

00:32:57.540 team acted

00:32:58.320 against their

00:32:59.260 own interests

00:33:00.080 for that

00:33:00.780 theory to

00:33:01.920 make sense.

00:33:05.040 And layers

00:33:05.780 of censorship

00:33:06.400 and threats

00:33:07.020 of losing

00:33:07.440 one's life?

00:33:08.180 No, because

00:33:08.660 every citizen

00:33:10.020 knew about

00:33:10.720 this trade-off.

00:33:11.980 It's not

00:33:12.460 reasonable to

00:33:13.100 assume that

00:33:13.620 his staff

00:33:14.240 working on

00:33:15.480 this issue

00:33:16.100 weren't also

00:33:17.480 aware of the

00:33:18.120 rumors, at

00:33:18.720 least, that

00:33:20.300 the emergency

00:33:22.100 authorization was

00:33:23.180 holding things

00:33:23.760 up.

00:33:24.360 They would

00:33:24.740 have known

00:33:25.040 that.

00:33:25.600 We all

00:33:25.940 knew it.

00:33:26.840 If the

00:33:27.180 public knew

00:33:27.700 it, they

00:33:28.040 obviously

00:33:28.440 knew it.

00:33:30.700 Deep

00:33:31.180 stayed in

00:33:31.680 bed with

00:33:32.100 pharma doesn't

00:33:33.240 work that

00:33:33.640 way.

00:33:34.640 It doesn't

00:33:35.060 work that

00:33:35.440 way.

00:33:36.080 If you're

00:33:36.880 an underling,

00:33:38.440 you might

00:33:38.860 take a

00:33:39.240 bribe or be

00:33:39.920 influenced by

00:33:40.540 big pharma.

00:33:41.820 If there's

00:33:42.600 something that

00:33:43.080 doesn't matter

00:33:43.620 to your

00:33:43.960 political

00:33:44.300 future, even

00:33:46.100 if you're a

00:33:46.980 top politician,

00:33:47.700 well, you

00:33:48.360 might be

00:33:48.700 influenced by

00:33:49.280 big pharma.

00:33:50.480 But if

00:33:51.080 there's a

00:33:51.440 direct choice

00:33:52.300 between getting

00:33:53.500 re-elected or

00:33:54.960 doing what

00:33:55.460 big pharma

00:33:56.240 wants, you

00:33:57.460 tell me that

00:33:58.020 Trump chose

00:33:58.840 to do what

00:33:59.420 big pharma

00:33:59.940 wanted instead

00:34:01.200 of getting

00:34:01.560 re-elected for

00:34:02.260 a second

00:34:02.580 term.

00:34:03.440 In no

00:34:03.980 world did

00:34:04.540 that happen.

00:34:05.600 In no

00:34:05.960 world did

00:34:07.100 that happen.

00:34:09.780 All right?

00:34:10.420 Trump is as

00:34:12.220 close as you

00:34:12.920 can get to

00:34:13.520 incorruptible on

00:34:15.100 a question

00:34:15.600 limited to

00:34:16.420 that.

00:34:16.760 Any other

00:34:18.640 question, you

00:34:19.620 know, you're

00:34:19.920 on your

00:34:20.180 own.

00:34:20.920 But on the

00:34:21.360 very limited

00:34:22.140 question of

00:34:22.780 did he want

00:34:23.240 to get

00:34:23.480 re-elected,

00:34:24.940 no, there

00:34:25.300 wasn't any

00:34:25.820 bribe that

00:34:26.220 was big

00:34:26.520 enough.

00:34:27.480 There's no

00:34:27.920 bribe big

00:34:28.380 enough that

00:34:28.720 would have

00:34:28.920 kept him

00:34:29.300 from wanting

00:34:29.680 to get

00:34:29.980 re-elected.

00:34:31.040 I feel very

00:34:31.780 confident about

00:34:32.420 that.

00:34:32.980 Can't read

00:34:33.380 minds, could

00:34:34.600 be surprised,

00:34:36.000 nothing's 100%.

00:34:37.200 But really, if

00:34:39.420 you believe the

00:34:40.300 emergency

00:34:40.740 authorization held

00:34:41.920 things up,

00:34:43.040 you've got a lot

00:34:44.160 of assumptions that

00:34:45.000 you need to wrap

00:34:45.720 around that to

00:34:46.380 hold it together.

00:34:47.540 I just don't see

00:34:48.420 how it can be

00:34:48.960 done.

00:34:50.100 But I could be

00:34:50.820 wrong.

00:34:51.600 There could be

00:34:52.280 some twist to

00:34:53.040 this that I

00:34:53.560 don't see.

00:34:54.680 Could be

00:34:55.200 wrong.

00:34:56.680 All right.

00:34:57.460 But I do

00:34:57.960 think if we

00:34:58.560 find anybody in

00:34:59.660 big pharma who

00:35:00.460 is doing that

00:35:01.100 sort of thing,

00:35:01.880 the death

00:35:02.240 sentence is not

00:35:03.260 too strong.

00:35:04.860 It should be

00:35:05.320 the death

00:35:05.680 sentence.

00:35:07.020 And by the

00:35:07.440 way, we should

00:35:07.960 put that out

00:35:08.540 there.

00:35:08.820 It should be

00:35:09.100 actually, I

00:35:09.740 think we should

00:35:10.140 put it into

00:35:10.560 law.

00:35:10.920 We should

00:35:12.040 say that if

00:35:12.600 big pharma hides

00:35:14.260 information that

00:35:15.140 causes mass

00:35:16.400 casualties, that

00:35:17.380 that should be a

00:35:17.920 death sentence.

00:35:19.360 Because you need

00:35:20.100 to put that fear

00:35:20.900 into them.

00:35:22.280 Because, you

00:35:22.660 know, I think a

00:35:23.480 career criminal

00:35:24.200 might not care

00:35:25.260 about the death

00:35:25.840 sentence.

00:35:27.200 But if you're an

00:35:28.420 executive and

00:35:29.220 you're just doing

00:35:29.680 stuff for money,

00:35:30.600 you might care

00:35:31.300 about the death

00:35:31.860 sentence.

00:35:33.020 You might care

00:35:33.920 about that a lot.

00:35:36.600 All right.

00:35:37.000 So Omicron is

00:35:37.920 out competing Delta,

00:35:39.060 we hear today.

00:35:40.920 And that one

00:35:43.240 death in Great

00:35:44.140 Britain, or the

00:35:45.100 UK, that we

00:35:46.580 heard about, there

00:35:47.440 was somebody who

00:35:47.980 died with Omicron.

00:35:50.640 CNN has now

00:35:51.560 converted dying

00:35:52.660 with Omicron to

00:35:54.560 dying of Omicron.

00:35:57.200 So it made that a

00:35:58.200 subtle shift of

00:35:59.680 dying with it, that

00:36:01.040 could have been a

00:36:01.500 coincidence, to

00:36:03.160 dying of it.

00:36:05.220 I don't know that

00:36:06.340 that was supported

00:36:07.040 by the facts.

00:36:08.080 Could be.

00:36:08.920 It could be that

00:36:09.580 they have better

00:36:10.140 information about

00:36:10.860 what that one

00:36:11.520 patient experienced.

00:36:13.600 But I doubt it.

00:36:15.160 I doubt it.

00:36:17.000 All right.

00:36:19.040 And we are still

00:36:19.960 being told that

00:36:20.700 even if Omicron

00:36:21.620 is mild, we

00:36:22.380 should not get

00:36:23.080 too complacent

00:36:24.920 because the

00:36:25.680 sheer volume of

00:36:27.040 this mildness

00:36:27.780 might crash

00:36:28.900 the hospitals.

00:36:31.920 Wait.

00:36:32.940 Wait.

00:36:33.500 What?

00:36:35.700 We should not

00:36:36.460 be complacent

00:36:37.360 even if it's

00:36:39.020 mild, because

00:36:41.420 there would be

00:36:41.800 so much

00:36:42.340 mildness, it

00:36:44.800 would crash

00:36:45.260 our health

00:36:46.240 care.

00:36:46.460 Do you think

00:36:49.500 somebody is

00:36:50.200 trying to

00:36:51.240 brainwash you

00:36:52.880 into getting

00:36:53.580 vaccinated?

00:36:56.380 Because this

00:36:57.220 doesn't even

00:36:57.680 make sense.

00:36:59.380 Here's how it

00:37:00.100 would make sense

00:37:00.680 if they were not

00:37:01.300 trying to brainwash

00:37:02.220 you.

00:37:02.400 There are a

00:37:04.080 couple of

00:37:04.360 different ways

00:37:04.860 this Omicron

00:37:05.600 could go.

00:37:06.740 It could be the

00:37:07.460 thing that solves

00:37:08.140 all of our

00:37:08.580 problems and

00:37:09.160 turns out to be

00:37:09.780 more of a

00:37:10.240 vaccination than

00:37:11.120 a virus.

00:37:12.280 Or, this is a

00:37:13.700 real possibility,

00:37:14.960 we could be

00:37:15.520 underestimating it

00:37:16.440 and it could be a

00:37:17.060 big problem.

00:37:18.940 Wouldn't that be

00:37:19.660 fair?

00:37:20.940 Did I say

00:37:21.560 something that was

00:37:22.420 unreasonable?

00:37:23.800 Given that we

00:37:24.500 don't know, it

00:37:26.540 could be a

00:37:27.080 vaccination and

00:37:27.940 it could be more

00:37:28.600 of a problem

00:37:29.100 than we think.

00:37:30.320 But to say one

00:37:31.440 person died of

00:37:32.380 it, which

00:37:32.760 probably we

00:37:33.540 can't even

00:37:34.000 confirm, and

00:37:35.680 it's so mild,

00:37:36.640 there could be a

00:37:37.260 lot of this

00:37:37.660 mildness, isn't

00:37:38.880 that exactly what

00:37:39.860 we want?

00:37:41.020 Lots of mild

00:37:41.920 virus?

00:37:43.260 What could be

00:37:43.840 better than a

00:37:44.580 super fast,

00:37:45.720 mild coronavirus

00:37:47.260 that is vaccinating

00:37:48.760 us from the

00:37:49.760 Delta?

00:37:50.740 Because I think

00:37:51.340 that's what it

00:37:51.860 does.

00:37:52.880 Yeah, when

00:37:55.200 you see the

00:37:55.780 news treated

00:37:56.600 this way, I

00:37:57.280 mean, this is

00:37:57.740 so not an

00:37:59.140 objective look at

00:38:00.000 the news.

00:38:01.480 All right.

00:38:03.360 Talk about

00:38:04.120 timing.

00:38:05.560 Who has the

00:38:06.160 best timing in

00:38:06.860 the world?

00:38:07.360 Well, sometimes

00:38:08.840 me, sometimes

00:38:10.080 me.

00:38:11.160 Do you remember

00:38:11.700 yesterday I was

00:38:12.500 giving, I think

00:38:13.420 it was yesterday,

00:38:14.500 the day before I

00:38:15.260 was giving you

00:38:15.760 the best ofs for

00:38:17.780 the year?

00:38:18.820 Was that

00:38:19.180 yesterday?

00:38:20.400 And I called

00:38:21.440 out the most

00:38:22.160 persuasive person

00:38:23.280 was Michael

00:38:24.360 Schellenberger.

00:38:25.840 And I said

00:38:26.500 that he'd

00:38:26.920 moved the

00:38:27.480 needle on

00:38:28.600 people's opinion

00:38:29.600 about nuclear

00:38:30.380 energy from

00:38:31.700 half of the

00:38:32.720 country being

00:38:33.220 negative to

00:38:33.920 literally everybody's

00:38:35.000 on board now.

00:38:36.160 Basically, the

00:38:37.000 entire country

00:38:38.100 turned pro-nuclear

00:38:39.020 at just about the

00:38:41.180 time he was

00:38:41.720 doing the most,

00:38:44.780 I'll use this

00:38:46.320 phrase, nuclear-powered

00:38:47.760 persuasion on it.

00:38:48.700 I think he

00:38:50.220 actually turned

00:38:50.840 the boat, but it

00:38:52.500 gets better.

00:38:53.460 I mentioned, just

00:38:54.300 as an aside, I

00:38:55.780 said that he'd

00:38:56.420 changed his focus

00:38:57.420 recently to San

00:38:59.360 Francisco.

00:39:00.000 He's got a book

00:39:00.660 out called San

00:39:01.540 Francisco, which is

00:39:03.840 doing really well.

00:39:04.920 You should read it.

00:39:06.320 And he's going

00:39:08.080 after the, you

00:39:09.600 know, San

00:39:09.920 Francisco in

00:39:10.720 particular, their

00:39:11.900 management of the

00:39:13.080 homelessness and the

00:39:14.820 drugs and the

00:39:15.440 crime.

00:39:15.700 And he had a

00:39:17.520 bunch of real

00:39:19.240 world solutions, so

00:39:20.740 it wasn't just

00:39:21.340 complaining, it was

00:39:22.280 saying other places

00:39:24.180 have done these

00:39:24.840 things, these things

00:39:25.720 work, the things

00:39:26.940 they're doing don't

00:39:27.720 work, blah, blah,

00:39:28.780 blah, blah, blah.

00:39:29.660 And he was really

00:39:30.840 pounding it hard.

00:39:32.380 I mean, really

00:39:32.860 talking to the right

00:39:33.640 people, tweeting,

00:39:35.340 writing articles that

00:39:36.240 were just pure fire,

00:39:38.440 and showing data to

00:39:40.960 back everything up.

00:39:42.100 I mean, just really

00:39:43.220 persuasive stuff.

00:39:44.260 yesterday, San

00:39:47.020 Francisco Mayor

00:39:47.860 London Breed just

00:39:50.360 gave a press

00:39:51.800 release, and she

00:39:53.240 has announced a

00:39:54.060 major crackdown on

00:39:55.280 crime, including

00:39:56.840 open-air drug

00:39:57.840 dealing, which was

00:39:59.380 Michael Schellenberger's

00:40:01.420 one of his biggest

00:40:02.160 focuses, car break-ins

00:40:03.960 and retail theft.

00:40:06.160 And as Michael

00:40:07.520 points out in his

00:40:08.320 own tweet about it,

00:40:09.100 he says the plan

00:40:09.760 contains much of

00:40:11.360 what I and my

00:40:12.040 colleagues at

00:40:13.000 California Peace

00:40:14.040 have been advocating.

00:40:17.940 Damn.

00:40:19.580 He actually got

00:40:20.680 this done.

00:40:22.240 What?

00:40:23.600 What?

00:40:24.960 He actually got

00:40:26.120 this done.

00:40:28.600 So London Breed

00:40:29.760 went on further,

00:40:30.760 the mayor of San

00:40:31.740 Francisco, and says

00:40:33.420 we need to change

00:40:34.080 course in how we

00:40:34.800 handle public safety

00:40:35.800 in San Francisco.

00:40:36.640 We can't be a

00:40:37.820 place where

00:40:38.300 anything goes on

00:40:40.860 the street.

00:40:42.320 Today, I am

00:40:43.020 announcing a series

00:40:43.820 of new steps

00:40:44.700 to address public

00:40:46.180 safety in our

00:40:46.920 city.

00:40:49.960 Boom.

00:40:51.520 Boom.

00:40:52.980 I called that

00:40:53.920 yesterday.

00:40:55.920 I called that

00:40:56.820 yesterday.

00:40:58.020 Now, Bradley

00:40:58.680 says it was an

00:40:59.460 accident.

00:41:00.340 It wasn't.

00:41:01.620 It wasn't.

00:41:02.180 I can tell you

00:41:03.720 that Michael

00:41:04.480 Schellenberger

00:41:05.160 had burrowed

00:41:06.180 deeply into

00:41:07.280 all of the

00:41:08.760 heads of the

00:41:09.640 decision makers

00:41:10.400 because he does

00:41:11.760 have that skill.

00:41:17.440 Well, Merry

00:41:18.160 Christmas

00:41:18.660 at the Venice

00:41:21.080 Beach Dub

00:41:22.080 Club.

00:41:22.920 Even though you

00:41:23.540 don't agree with

00:41:24.160 me, Merry

00:41:24.700 Christmas to you.

00:41:25.340 And Merry

00:41:25.660 Christmas to

00:41:26.180 everybody who

00:41:26.680 doesn't agree

00:41:27.160 with me.

00:41:28.240 Speaking of

00:41:28.920 agreeing with me,

00:41:29.640 I ran this

00:41:30.580 obnoxious poll,

00:41:32.620 possibly the

00:41:33.800 most obnoxious

00:41:34.640 thing I've ever

00:41:35.280 done, and I've

00:41:36.500 done a lot of

00:41:37.060 obnoxious things.

00:41:38.640 This is the most

00:41:39.520 obnoxious thing

00:41:40.260 I've done, well,

00:41:41.020 recently, this

00:41:42.180 week.

00:41:43.460 I ran a poll

00:41:44.460 and it said

00:41:45.000 this, if you

00:41:46.100 saw me,

00:41:47.260 specifically me,

00:41:48.860 disagreeing with

00:41:49.640 the top expert

00:41:50.520 in a field in

00:41:51.780 which I have no

00:41:52.560 experience, but

00:41:54.300 I'm only

00:41:54.600 disagreeing on

00:41:55.180 one specific

00:41:55.900 point within the

00:41:56.700 field, who

00:41:57.980 would you bet

00:41:58.540 on?

00:41:59.640 If you didn't

00:42:00.360 know anything

00:42:00.800 else about the

00:42:01.480 topic.

00:42:02.000 So, no fair

00:42:02.700 saying, I need

00:42:03.380 to know more

00:42:03.820 about the

00:42:04.160 topic.

00:42:04.840 You have to

00:42:05.400 bet whose

00:42:06.640 side you're

00:42:07.180 on without

00:42:07.700 knowing anything

00:42:09.960 else.

00:42:14.140 And why

00:42:14.580 would you bet

00:42:15.780 on the expert

00:42:16.420 or why would

00:42:17.180 you bet on

00:42:17.640 me?

00:42:24.040 I see

00:42:24.700 expert, I

00:42:25.820 see some

00:42:26.320 people agree

00:42:26.840 with me, and

00:42:28.680 I'm seeing on

00:42:29.220 locals, they're

00:42:29.840 saying my

00:42:30.260 history of

00:42:31.020 prediction.

00:42:32.580 All right,

00:42:32.900 here's the

00:42:33.360 answer.

00:42:34.700 You should

00:42:35.260 bet on me.

00:42:37.380 Right?

00:42:38.080 And I

00:42:38.680 realize how

00:42:40.200 Dr. Robert

00:42:43.740 Johnson is

00:42:44.380 saying, bet

00:42:45.040 on Scott.

00:42:46.280 All right,

00:42:46.940 here's the

00:42:47.940 reason why

00:42:48.560 the answer

00:42:49.000 is me.

00:42:50.960 Number one,

00:42:52.740 and here's the

00:42:53.520 trick part of

00:42:54.060 the question.

00:42:55.040 The important

00:42:55.780 part of the

00:42:56.120 question is I'm

00:42:56.780 disagreeing on

00:42:57.320 one specific

00:42:58.120 point.

00:42:59.900 If I looked at

00:43:00.820 everything the

00:43:01.420 expert said, I'm

00:43:03.500 not questioning

00:43:04.300 it.

00:43:05.160 So the only

00:43:06.040 situation in

00:43:06.880 which there

00:43:07.220 would ever be a

00:43:07.980 disagreement

00:43:08.460 between me and

00:43:10.920 an expert who

00:43:11.700 is a top expert

00:43:12.480 in the field,

00:43:13.200 the only time I

00:43:14.320 would ever

00:43:14.660 disagree is if I

00:43:16.400 saw one little

00:43:17.100 thing where my

00:43:18.660 special skills of

00:43:19.860 bullshit detection

00:43:20.900 could just see it

00:43:22.480 clearly.

00:43:22.760 So in other

00:43:24.400 words, I

00:43:25.000 wouldn't take a

00:43:25.920 shot unless I

00:43:27.940 knew I could

00:43:28.340 hit it.

00:43:29.580 See what I'm

00:43:30.180 saying?

00:43:30.820 If you've watched

00:43:31.600 my track record,

00:43:32.600 you know that I

00:43:33.360 don't take on

00:43:34.500 every topic because

00:43:36.080 I think, well, I

00:43:37.160 don't know, what

00:43:37.480 do I have to add

00:43:38.020 to that?

00:43:38.920 Well, if the

00:43:39.440 experts say so,

00:43:40.580 eh.

00:43:41.540 I mean, 99% of

00:43:43.300 every topic I go

00:43:44.820 with the experts.

00:43:46.860 1% of the time,

00:43:48.120 or something small,

00:43:49.700 I say, wait a

00:43:50.360 minute, wait a

00:43:50.740 minute, I have a

00:43:51.360 little insight on

00:43:52.080 that specific

00:43:52.700 thing, just that

00:43:53.280 one point, and I

00:43:55.000 know that's a lie.

00:43:56.080 Let me give you

00:43:56.600 an example.

00:43:57.900 When Dr.

00:43:58.780 Fauci initially

00:44:00.100 said, don't wear

00:44:01.600 masks, they won't

00:44:02.620 help.

00:44:03.220 Now, forget about

00:44:03.860 the argument of

00:44:04.460 whether masks help,

00:44:05.560 okay?

00:44:06.420 I'm just telling you

00:44:07.160 I can call it a

00:44:08.020 lie.

00:44:09.440 I am the only

00:44:10.420 person in the

00:44:11.240 United States, a

00:44:12.640 public figure, who

00:44:14.020 said loudly and

00:44:14.960 clearly, that's a

00:44:15.800 lie.

00:44:16.800 I detect that.

00:44:18.320 Now, am I an

00:44:19.120 expert on masks?

00:44:21.360 No.

00:44:23.000 No.

00:44:24.000 Does Fauci know

00:44:25.980 way more than I

00:44:26.900 do about infectious

00:44:27.920 diseases?

00:44:29.500 Yeah.

00:44:30.780 Yeah, I mean, you

00:44:31.540 can criticize him all

00:44:32.520 day long about

00:44:33.180 whatever, but he's

00:44:34.420 definitely a top

00:44:36.120 expert in the field.

00:44:37.460 Now, who was

00:44:38.000 right?

00:44:38.840 Turns out that I

00:44:39.640 accurately called

00:44:40.640 out his lie.

00:44:42.360 Number two, when

00:44:44.200 we first heard that

00:44:45.300 Wuhan was having a

00:44:46.700 problem, who was one

00:44:49.120 of the two first

00:44:50.980 public figures, I

00:44:52.080 think Jack

00:44:52.480 Posobiec was on

00:44:53.240 this fast, who was

00:44:55.280 one of the top

00:44:55.860 people who said,

00:44:56.960 nope, you're wrong,

00:44:58.040 all you experts are

00:44:58.940 wrong, close those

00:44:59.760 borders, close the

00:45:01.020 borders.

00:45:02.100 I did.

00:45:03.300 I was literally

00:45:04.300 cursing the storm and

00:45:06.380 screaming at my

00:45:07.280 screen for Trump to

00:45:08.980 close the border.

00:45:10.320 A week later, he

00:45:11.140 closed the border.

00:45:12.160 What did the experts

00:45:12.820 say now?

00:45:13.320 Should have done it

00:45:15.020 sooner or more

00:45:16.380 completely.

00:45:17.260 Might have made a

00:45:17.840 difference.

00:45:18.980 Might have saved a

00:45:19.700 hundred thousand lives.

00:45:20.840 May have saved a

00:45:22.280 hundred thousand lives

00:45:23.200 when we did it.

00:45:25.260 I mean, it could have

00:45:25.740 been worse.

00:45:28.040 So, if you see me

00:45:31.560 disagreeing with Dr.

00:45:34.800 McCullough, who is,

00:45:37.300 as somebody pointed

00:45:38.120 out, one of the most

00:45:39.320 cited people in the

00:45:40.380 field, a top expert.

00:45:41.460 But I'm only picking

00:45:43.280 out one thing.

00:45:44.800 I haven't done that,

00:45:45.680 by the way.

00:45:46.340 By the way, I haven't

00:45:47.040 found anything I

00:45:47.780 disagreed with.

00:45:49.320 Only because I don't

00:45:50.240 know everything he

00:45:50.900 says.

00:45:51.920 But, if I did that,

00:45:54.820 who should you bet

00:45:56.100 on?

00:45:58.300 Me.

00:45:59.480 And it has to do

00:46:00.380 with the fact that I

00:46:01.100 would select the one

00:46:02.820 special area that I

00:46:05.480 could see quite clearly

00:46:06.580 there was a problem.

00:46:08.020 Now, does this make

00:46:10.740 me magic?

00:46:11.860 Nope.

00:46:12.680 Let me give you, you

00:46:14.100 know, an example.

00:46:15.820 If an experienced

00:46:18.020 police officer told

00:46:20.660 you that somebody was

00:46:21.640 lying, but you

00:46:24.280 weren't sure, who

00:46:25.920 would you believe?

00:46:28.180 Well, I'd believe the

00:46:28.880 police officer.

00:46:30.080 Because even though I

00:46:31.100 feel pretty good about

00:46:32.300 my lie detection skills,

00:46:34.220 I wouldn't put it up

00:46:35.360 against a 25-year

00:46:36.600 police professional who

00:46:38.460 only sees lies all

00:46:39.820 day.

00:46:40.080 I mean, if you've

00:46:42.380 been a cop for 25

00:46:43.440 years and you can't

00:46:44.300 detect a perp who's

00:46:46.060 lying to you with,

00:46:47.660 you know, 80-90%

00:46:48.800 accuracy, then you

00:46:50.840 haven't been doing

00:46:51.380 your job.

00:46:52.700 So, you have to look

00:46:54.420 at what the specific

00:46:55.340 thing is and the

00:46:56.200 specific question.

00:46:57.440 But I wouldn't take a

00:46:58.520 shot at a top expert

00:47:00.020 unless I knew I had

00:47:01.360 the shot.

00:47:02.720 So, that's what's

00:47:03.640 different about me.

00:47:04.720 I have a track record

00:47:05.820 where you can see

00:47:06.560 that.

00:47:07.620 If it was just some

00:47:08.340 random smart person,

00:47:09.960 you wouldn't know.

00:47:11.040 There wouldn't be a

00:47:11.520 track record to look

00:47:12.320 at.

00:47:13.660 Okay.

00:47:16.280 Surprisingly, in the

00:47:17.200 poll, at least last

00:47:18.780 time I checked, I was

00:47:19.620 slightly ahead of the

00:47:20.400 experts.

00:47:21.480 Because I think many of

00:47:23.680 you were clever enough

00:47:24.780 to know that when I

00:47:25.680 added the one specific

00:47:27.200 point part, that that

00:47:29.200 gave me an advantage

00:47:30.260 that's, you know, not

00:47:31.760 representative of my

00:47:32.960 knowledge.

00:47:33.340 Yeah, don't take the

00:47:36.740 shot unless you know

00:47:37.480 you can make it.

00:47:38.040 That's similar to a

00:47:39.560 trial lawyer.

00:47:41.020 You're never supposed

00:47:41.720 to ask a question if

00:47:42.760 you don't already know

00:47:43.420 the answer.

00:47:45.280 So, it's sort of like

00:47:46.200 that.

00:47:46.780 Yeah, low-hanging fruit.

00:47:48.600 Yeah, that's another

00:47:49.300 way to put it.

00:47:50.020 Low-hanging fruit.

00:47:51.880 All right.

00:47:52.760 Those were my

00:47:53.620 prepared remarks.

00:47:55.800 I told the people on

00:47:56.580 Locals I'd take some

00:47:57.580 questions.

00:47:59.080 I haven't watched

00:48:00.120 Rogan McCullough.

00:48:01.620 And I have a

00:48:02.320 challenge for you.

00:48:03.760 Because Joe Rogan

00:48:04.740 interviewed Dr. McCullough.

00:48:07.660 Now, here's my

00:48:10.260 challenge to you.

00:48:12.660 Summarize, if you

00:48:14.040 can, in one sentence.

00:48:15.300 Ideally, one sentence,

00:48:16.440 but I won't hold you

00:48:17.160 to it.

00:48:18.180 Summarize for me, and

00:48:19.100 then tweet it at me,

00:48:19.900 or put it in the

00:48:20.520 comments, one claim

00:48:22.360 that he makes that you

00:48:24.240 think I would disagree

00:48:25.160 with.

00:48:27.920 Because I haven't

00:48:28.720 heard anything I

00:48:29.360 disagreed with yet.

00:48:31.540 I've only heard people

00:48:32.520 talking about it yet.

00:48:33.340 So I want to hear

00:48:34.240 something that you

00:48:35.020 think I would

00:48:35.640 disagree with.

00:48:41.940 The mask thing was

00:48:43.300 possibly a plot to

00:48:44.480 make people believe.

00:48:47.620 Oh, I don't know

00:48:48.420 about that.

00:48:48.920 Okay.

00:48:52.000 All right.

00:48:53.860 No asymptomatic

00:48:55.240 spread.

00:48:56.440 I don't know what

00:48:56.920 that means.

00:48:57.320 Oh, is he saying that

00:49:00.260 it doesn't spread

00:49:01.140 asymptomatically?

00:49:03.940 That sounds like

00:49:04.880 word thinking to me.

00:49:07.320 That just means

00:49:08.160 somebody's not aware

00:49:09.000 that they have it.

00:49:10.960 I'm not sure that

00:49:12.300 there's anything there

00:49:13.140 I would disagree with.

00:49:15.120 That you can't catch

00:49:16.960 COVID twice.

00:49:18.220 I believe the science

00:49:22.600 says that at least

00:49:24.180 one person has

00:49:25.080 caught COVID twice,

00:49:26.120 but it's rare.

00:49:27.360 So what,

00:49:28.480 don't we agree on

00:49:29.340 that?

00:49:30.040 That's the same thing

00:49:30.880 he would say,

00:49:31.380 right?

00:49:32.800 He says you can't

00:49:33.860 get COVID twice.

00:49:34.660 I agree with that,

00:49:36.040 with the exception

00:49:37.140 that I know there

00:49:38.080 were a few people

00:49:39.160 who got it twice,

00:49:40.880 but they were,

00:49:41.260 I think they were

00:49:41.760 immunocompromised,

00:49:43.620 so it doesn't mean

00:49:44.160 anything.

00:49:44.420 So in terms of

00:49:45.680 the larger picture,

00:49:46.640 I completely agree

00:49:47.420 with him, okay?

00:49:56.520 I'm not sure if

00:49:57.480 these are his thoughts

00:49:58.580 or your thoughts.

00:50:03.960 Somebody says,

00:50:04.800 no, there are many

00:50:05.480 that got it twice.

00:50:06.840 I'm not aware of that.

00:50:11.640 Will I please,

00:50:12.800 about the interview?

00:50:15.040 Maybe.

00:50:15.920 I don't think

00:50:16.360 that got lost.

00:50:19.520 Can't catch the same

00:50:20.460 variant twice.

00:50:21.100 I don't really have

00:50:21.600 an opinion on that,

00:50:22.520 so there's nothing

00:50:23.220 I would disagree with.

00:50:32.380 He said hydroxychloroquine

00:50:34.560 is effective.

00:50:38.200 He did?

00:50:39.140 Or did he say

00:50:39.780 it might be?

00:50:41.280 I'll bet he didn't

00:50:41.960 say that.

00:50:42.800 I'll bet he didn't

00:50:44.840 say that.

00:50:46.040 I'll bet he said

00:50:46.820 it might be,

00:50:49.040 so that it was

00:50:49.760 a good risk management.

00:50:52.240 So you're saying

00:50:52.800 that he's the,

00:50:53.700 so he alone

00:50:54.820 is saying that

00:50:55.420 hydroxychloroquine

00:50:56.360 works.

00:50:58.800 What about

00:50:59.420 ivermectin?

00:51:00.080 Does he say

00:51:00.500 that works?

00:51:04.280 He said it worked

00:51:05.220 for his patients.

00:51:06.800 Oh!

00:51:09.440 That's it.

00:51:10.040 Can somebody confirm

00:51:13.820 this?

00:51:14.060 I hope he didn't

00:51:14.680 say this.

00:51:15.560 Are you telling me

00:51:16.220 that Dr. McCullough

00:51:17.200 thinks hydroxychloroquine

00:51:18.540 works because it

00:51:19.380 worked for his

00:51:20.020 patients?

00:51:21.500 Did that actually

00:51:22.280 happen?

00:51:22.680 That didn't happen,

00:51:23.360 did it?

00:51:23.840 Please tell me

00:51:24.460 that's not true.

00:51:27.160 Okay,

00:51:27.500 I'm seeing somebody

00:51:28.140 say it's not true.

00:51:29.140 No,

00:51:34.980 that's not,

00:51:35.400 okay,

00:51:35.960 that didn't

00:51:36.660 sound like it.

00:51:37.500 So I think

00:51:38.040 here's the problem.

00:51:39.180 I'm not sure

00:51:39.780 if anybody

00:51:40.220 understands him

00:51:41.100 well enough

00:51:41.700 to tell me

00:51:43.640 something that

00:51:44.220 he said

00:51:44.780 that I would

00:51:45.740 disagree with.

00:51:47.040 I don't believe

00:51:47.920 you on the

00:51:48.280 hydroxychloroquine

00:51:49.140 part.

00:51:49.980 I think you're

00:51:50.560 not accurate

00:51:51.820 on that.

00:51:54.360 He said

00:51:55.040 hydroxychloroquine

00:51:56.160 is 64%

00:51:57.700 effective.

00:51:58.260 effective

00:51:58.740 when used

00:51:59.660 early.

00:52:04.100 Now,

00:52:04.780 what's my

00:52:05.160 opinion on

00:52:05.680 that?

00:52:08.720 My opinion

00:52:09.540 is that

00:52:11.200 if it were

00:52:11.720 effective,

00:52:12.340 we would

00:52:12.680 know about

00:52:13.120 it by

00:52:14.500 now.

00:52:19.480 Everybody

00:52:20.040 agrees with

00:52:20.720 early treatment,

00:52:22.120 but he's

00:52:22.840 talking about

00:52:23.340 a specific

00:52:23.820 way to

00:52:24.240 treat it.

00:52:24.640 which is

00:52:28.520 exactly why

00:52:29.160 you should

00:52:29.360 just watch

00:52:29.760 the interview.

00:52:30.760 Well,

00:52:31.080 I will

00:52:31.380 watch the

00:52:31.800 interview,

00:52:32.420 but what I'm

00:52:33.160 telling you

00:52:33.640 is I'm

00:52:34.140 fascinated by

00:52:34.940 the fact

00:52:35.320 that everybody

00:52:36.500 thinks he's

00:52:37.120 saying great

00:52:37.660 things,

00:52:38.580 and you

00:52:39.200 can't describe

00:52:40.080 them,

00:52:40.920 even in

00:52:42.060 layperson's

00:52:42.760 terms.

00:52:43.040 your advice

00:52:48.500 to me is

00:52:48.920 terrible,

00:52:49.560 by the

00:52:49.800 way.

00:52:50.360 So your

00:52:50.600 advice is

00:52:51.260 that if I

00:52:52.400 watch it,

00:52:52.860 I'll be

00:52:53.180 convinced.

00:52:54.140 Can somebody

00:52:54.720 here tell

00:52:55.160 me what I

00:52:56.180 always say

00:52:56.660 about that?

00:52:58.060 Do you

00:52:58.520 believe that

00:52:59.020 if I

00:52:59.320 watched

00:52:59.660 Dr.

00:53:00.180 McCullough,

00:53:01.100 I would

00:53:01.700 be convinced

00:53:02.700 that he

00:53:03.240 sounds

00:53:03.540 credible?

00:53:04.280 How many

00:53:04.660 of you

00:53:04.880 think I

00:53:05.200 would be

00:53:05.500 convinced?

00:53:08.600 Would I

00:53:09.160 be convinced

00:53:09.720 if I

00:53:10.080 listen to

00:53:10.440 him?

00:53:15.300 Well,

00:53:16.400 I'll give

00:53:19.180 you two

00:53:19.440 answers.

00:53:21.440 My

00:53:21.920 rational

00:53:22.440 brain would

00:53:23.160 say I

00:53:23.620 should not

00:53:24.120 be convinced

00:53:24.760 because I'm

00:53:25.300 not hearing

00:53:25.720 the other

00:53:26.080 side.

00:53:27.140 Anytime you're

00:53:27.820 hearing one

00:53:28.380 expert talking

00:53:29.180 to a non-expert,

00:53:30.480 you are being

00:53:31.060 misled because

00:53:32.700 you don't hear

00:53:33.120 the other

00:53:33.440 side.

00:53:34.700 But I

00:53:36.700 also might

00:53:37.160 just disagree

00:53:38.380 on sort of

00:53:39.000 a general

00:53:39.440 statement

00:53:39.820 because he's

00:53:40.580 a rogue

00:53:41.380 doctor.

00:53:45.040 The elephant

00:53:45.840 in the room,

00:53:46.700 COVID is

00:53:47.100 dangerous but

00:53:47.800 not at the

00:53:48.300 border.

00:53:49.140 Why,

00:53:49.580 Scott?

00:53:50.240 Are you

00:53:50.800 really confused

00:53:51.380 about that?

00:53:52.240 I feel like

00:53:52.880 that's just

00:53:53.240 one of those

00:53:53.640 political things

00:53:54.460 people say.

00:53:55.700 Like,

00:53:56.060 they act

00:53:56.440 confused.

00:53:57.840 Like,

00:53:58.480 why,

00:53:59.400 if COVID

00:53:59.900 is so bad,

00:54:01.420 why are we

00:54:01.900 opening the

00:54:02.360 borders?

00:54:03.040 Is there

00:54:03.480 anybody who's

00:54:03.980 legitimately

00:54:04.660 confused about

00:54:05.600 that?

00:54:05.900 I know it's

00:54:06.260 one of those

00:54:06.640 things people

00:54:07.100 say to make

00:54:08.260 a political

00:54:08.680 point.

00:54:09.440 But is

00:54:09.820 there

00:54:09.940 anybody who

00:54:10.620 actually

00:54:11.040 doesn't

00:54:11.420 understand

00:54:11.840 it?

00:54:17.280 You

00:54:17.800 actually

00:54:18.220 don't

00:54:18.500 understand

00:54:18.920 it.

00:54:22.780 It's

00:54:23.300 because they

00:54:23.900 value the

00:54:26.680 well-being of

00:54:28.520 the immigrants

00:54:29.080 over the

00:54:29.840 well-being of

00:54:30.580 the citizens.

00:54:31.820 What else

00:54:32.440 would it be?

00:54:32.860 why is there

00:54:35.800 any mystery

00:54:36.220 of this at

00:54:36.680 all?

00:54:37.600 It's very

00:54:38.060 direct.

00:54:39.300 If they

00:54:39.860 valued the

00:54:40.720 citizens'

00:54:41.300 health over

00:54:41.920 the well-being

00:54:42.640 of the

00:54:43.120 immigrants,

00:54:43.760 it would be

00:54:44.420 the opposite.

00:54:45.240 They'd just

00:54:45.620 stop them

00:54:45.980 from coming

00:54:46.400 in.

00:54:47.280 But that's

00:54:47.840 a decision.

00:54:49.060 It's a

00:54:49.480 decision to

00:54:50.360 rank the

00:54:51.180 well-being

00:54:51.980 of the

00:54:53.680 immigrants

00:54:54.200 higher than

00:54:56.560 the risk

00:54:57.800 to the

00:54:58.640 country.

00:54:59.460 what is

00:55:00.940 the mystery

00:55:01.540 about that?

00:55:03.200 Where do

00:55:03.760 you see the

00:55:04.140 mystery?

00:55:05.380 Why is that

00:55:05.880 confusing?

00:55:08.100 Now, if you

00:55:08.920 say you

00:55:09.360 would have

00:55:09.640 chosen

00:55:10.000 differently,

00:55:10.720 I get

00:55:11.140 that.

00:55:11.820 But it's

00:55:12.120 not confusing.

00:55:13.520 You act

00:55:13.960 like it's a

00:55:14.380 mystery or

00:55:14.820 something.

00:55:15.600 It's very

00:55:16.240 direct.

00:55:17.580 Now, could

00:55:18.660 I support

00:55:19.200 their opinion?

00:55:20.380 Yeah, I

00:55:20.740 could.

00:55:22.300 Here's the

00:55:22.900 argument for

00:55:23.620 it.

00:55:24.120 It's not my

00:55:24.700 argument.

00:55:25.940 I'm America

00:55:26.800 first, so this

00:55:28.300 is not my

00:55:28.960 argument.

00:55:29.380 But I'll

00:55:29.780 show you

00:55:30.080 that there

00:55:30.360 is an

00:55:30.620 argument for

00:55:31.120 it.

00:55:31.240 It goes

00:55:31.460 like this.

00:55:32.560 People are

00:55:33.080 people.

00:55:34.420 One life

00:55:35.160 is one

00:55:35.500 life.

00:55:36.440 The people

00:55:36.760 coming across

00:55:37.360 the border

00:55:38.060 are in

00:55:38.660 desperate

00:55:39.120 situation.

00:55:41.600 We try to

00:55:42.780 keep them

00:55:43.100 someplace for

00:55:43.700 two weeks.

00:55:44.160 There's

00:55:44.300 probably some

00:55:44.800 mitigation that

00:55:45.460 we don't

00:55:45.720 know about.

00:55:46.460 Maybe not.

00:55:47.720 But all

00:55:48.680 things considered,

00:55:50.500 we'd rather

00:55:51.340 help these

00:55:51.960 people in

00:55:52.520 desperate

00:55:52.940 situations than

00:55:54.740 we would

00:55:55.380 protect a

00:55:56.280 few extra

00:55:56.960 hundred thousand

00:55:57.580 Americans.

00:55:58.000 that's the

00:56:00.160 argument.

00:56:01.340 The argument

00:56:02.100 is it's bad

00:56:03.180 for everybody,

00:56:04.120 but it's

00:56:04.720 worse bad

00:56:05.560 for them,

00:56:06.140 so that's

00:56:07.240 where empathy

00:56:07.940 goes.

00:56:11.200 You could

00:56:11.880 argue that

00:56:12.300 it's being

00:56:12.760 done poorly.

00:56:13.420 That's a

00:56:13.660 separate

00:56:13.880 argument.

00:56:14.180 yes, you

00:56:20.760 could get

00:56:21.100 COVID over

00:56:21.620 and over

00:56:21.900 if your

00:56:22.280 immune system

00:56:22.860 is depressed.

00:56:23.660 That's

00:56:23.780 right.

00:56:28.780 Not

00:56:29.240 desperate.

00:56:31.100 Yes, you

00:56:31.780 are right.

00:56:33.300 I live in

00:56:34.100 California, so

00:56:34.840 I do have

00:56:35.360 an insight

00:56:36.100 into how

00:56:37.680 many of

00:56:38.060 the people

00:56:38.940 coming are

00:56:39.440 just for

00:56:39.840 economic

00:56:40.320 reasons and

00:56:41.080 how many

00:56:41.400 are desperately

00:56:42.620 in trouble and

00:56:43.360 just claiming

00:56:44.020 that they're

00:56:44.980 at risk.

00:56:45.700 And the

00:56:46.060 answer is

00:56:46.680 it's for

00:56:47.240 economic

00:56:47.580 reasons, but

00:56:48.560 everybody knows

00:56:49.160 that, right?

00:56:50.460 There's nobody

00:56:51.060 confused about

00:56:51.960 that.

00:56:52.460 It is for

00:56:52.840 economic

00:56:53.200 reasons.

00:56:57.900 Oh,

00:56:58.520 interesting.

00:56:59.000 Somebody's

00:56:59.340 wife works

00:56:59.960 with adults

00:57:00.500 with special

00:57:01.020 needs and

00:57:02.140 a number of

00:57:02.700 them have

00:57:03.040 contracted

00:57:03.660 COVID twice.

00:57:05.860 Interesting.

00:57:06.240 All right.

00:57:14.460 What are

00:57:14.980 your thoughts

00:57:15.340 on Dave

00:57:15.800 Rubin

00:57:16.240 leaving

00:57:16.780 California?

00:57:18.400 I don't

00:57:18.740 know.

00:57:18.880 Do you

00:57:19.040 need my

00:57:19.400 opinion on

00:57:19.900 that?

00:57:21.820 Isn't that

00:57:22.420 between Dave

00:57:23.020 and California?

00:57:24.580 Why does my

00:57:25.440 opinion have

00:57:25.900 anything to do

00:57:26.500 with anything?

00:57:29.180 It certainly

00:57:29.860 makes sense.

00:57:30.860 I mean, I'll

00:57:31.160 just say the

00:57:31.660 obvious thing,

00:57:32.360 which is he's

00:57:34.140 going from a

00:57:34.740 less free state

00:57:35.660 to a more

00:57:36.180 free state,

00:57:37.700 but, you

00:57:40.240 know, he

00:57:40.840 also has to

00:57:41.340 deal with the

00:57:41.760 humidity.

00:57:43.980 If he can

00:57:44.640 handle the

00:57:45.120 humidity, then

00:57:47.180 it was an

00:57:47.640 excellent move.

00:57:49.460 I don't think

00:57:50.220 I can handle

00:57:50.720 the humidity,

00:57:51.680 so I'm not

00:57:52.080 sure it's an

00:57:52.460 option for me.

00:57:53.700 Texas, maybe.

00:57:57.800 All right.

00:58:03.040 Please ask

00:58:04.060 locals if

00:58:04.840 anyone has

00:58:05.320 been able

00:58:05.660 to play

00:58:06.040 back the

00:58:06.460 interview

00:58:06.900 tips.

00:58:07.920 Well, they

00:58:08.180 should also

00:58:08.640 exist on

00:58:09.440 YouTube.

00:58:10.480 So if you

00:58:11.180 know which

00:58:11.760 day I did

00:58:12.640 that, go to

00:58:14.260 the YouTube

00:58:14.640 version, and

00:58:15.920 that will

00:58:16.140 play for

00:58:16.540 you.

00:58:20.080 Why do

00:58:20.620 you continue

00:58:21.060 to support

00:58:21.500 California with

00:58:22.320 your tax

00:58:22.740 dollars?

00:58:23.900 Well, not

00:58:24.680 paying taxes is

00:58:25.560 a bad idea, so

00:58:26.380 the real

00:58:26.660 question is,

00:58:27.180 why do I

00:58:27.500 stay in

00:58:27.840 California?

00:58:28.800 And the

00:58:29.320 answer is,

00:58:29.940 it's hard to

00:58:31.580 move, and I

00:58:32.960 haven't found

00:58:33.480 someplace better.

00:58:35.560 Now, there

00:58:36.240 are lots of

00:58:36.600 places that

00:58:37.200 are better in

00:58:37.880 certain ways,

00:58:38.900 but I haven't

00:58:40.480 found a place

00:58:41.260 that's better in

00:58:41.920 all the ways

00:58:42.540 that I need it

00:58:43.120 to be better.

00:58:43.820 So I would.

00:58:44.540 I mean, nothing

00:58:45.960 would stop me if

00:58:47.520 I could solve

00:58:48.720 all my

00:58:49.200 connections, but

00:58:51.560 I can't.

00:58:52.000 All right.

00:58:56.220 It's sort of a

00:58:57.020 network effect,

00:58:58.240 you know, for

00:58:58.980 you techie

00:58:59.880 nerds.

00:59:00.920 So California

00:59:01.520 is sort of a

00:59:02.140 network effect.

00:59:02.960 You get

00:59:03.220 embedded in

00:59:04.080 every way.

00:59:05.380 It's just so

00:59:06.520 hard.

00:59:11.120 Oh, yeah, the

00:59:12.200 two-state

00:59:12.680 solution would

00:59:13.860 be the ultimate,

00:59:14.700 but I can't

00:59:15.340 have two

00:59:15.740 houses.

00:59:17.040 I'm a one

00:59:17.700 house, one

00:59:18.160 car guy.

00:59:19.360 As soon as

00:59:19.800 you add a

00:59:20.260 second car or

00:59:21.120 a second house,

00:59:22.000 which I've

00:59:22.980 done, the

00:59:24.020 complications

00:59:24.880 just go,

00:59:26.560 just, you

00:59:27.260 know, just

00:59:27.900 becomes incredible.

00:59:29.580 So I need

00:59:30.380 simplicity.

00:59:31.520 So one car,

00:59:32.240 one house.

00:59:37.000 Ignorance is

00:59:37.660 no defense.

00:59:38.580 Ignorance of

00:59:39.060 what?

00:59:41.760 I don't even

00:59:42.380 know what you're

00:59:42.640 talking about.

00:59:44.580 All right.

00:59:50.220 Yeah, imagine

00:59:51.000 all the water

00:59:51.560 leaks.

00:59:52.580 I've had

00:59:53.080 something like

00:59:53.620 12 major

00:59:55.720 water leaks,

00:59:56.700 and none of

00:59:57.100 them are

00:59:57.340 related to

00:59:57.880 any construction

00:59:59.120 problem or

01:00:00.160 material use.

01:00:01.480 They're just

01:00:01.800 all coincidences.

01:00:03.240 They're just

01:00:03.500 all unrelated.

01:00:10.460 Scottsdale,

01:00:11.100 Arizona.

01:00:11.600 I don't like

01:00:12.000 deserts.

01:00:12.980 Deserts make

01:00:13.680 me feel creepy.

01:00:15.160 I've never

01:00:15.660 liked being in

01:00:16.440 any kind of

01:00:17.120 desert escape.

01:00:18.720 I just

01:00:19.280 feel, I feel

01:00:20.740 exposed.

01:00:22.180 Here's what it

01:00:22.780 is.

01:00:23.600 I don't want

01:00:24.360 to die because

01:00:25.820 I went

01:00:26.200 outdoors.

01:00:28.020 That's one of

01:00:28.680 my biggest

01:00:29.080 reasons for

01:00:29.580 living in

01:00:29.980 California,

01:00:30.680 is that where

01:00:31.620 I live, I

01:00:32.860 could go

01:00:33.260 outdoors for

01:00:34.760 two hours

01:00:36.260 anytime and

01:00:39.560 not die.

01:00:41.060 Like, it

01:00:41.580 could be the

01:00:41.980 coldest day in

01:00:42.660 the winter,

01:00:43.880 but it's still

01:00:44.360 going to be

01:00:44.580 in the

01:00:44.800 40s.

01:00:46.140 I could go

01:00:46.720 out without

01:00:47.120 a coat for

01:00:47.720 two hours.

01:00:48.640 I'd be very

01:00:49.260 unhappy, but

01:00:50.640 totally alive.

01:00:52.300 Totally alive.

01:00:53.180 Very unhappy.

01:00:54.520 But I

01:00:54.760 wouldn't die.

01:00:56.380 And there

01:00:56.780 are tons of

01:00:57.360 places where

01:00:57.920 you just

01:00:58.340 couldn't go

01:00:58.880 outside.

01:01:00.000 If it's

01:01:00.380 winter, I

01:01:01.820 almost died in

01:01:02.540 the snow once.

01:01:03.500 That's a long

01:01:03.920 story.

01:01:08.240 When will

01:01:12.500 the jackhammering

01:01:13.360 end?

01:01:13.660 I think

01:01:13.940 never.

01:01:15.100 It feels

01:01:15.540 like.

01:01:16.280 Will drought

01:01:16.940 kill California?

01:01:18.080 We've had, I

01:01:18.720 think, historically

01:01:19.440 there have been

01:01:19.900 worse ones, but

01:01:22.100 it could.

01:01:24.280 You said

01:01:24.900 yesterday that

01:01:25.500 you don't fear

01:01:26.080 death.

01:01:26.640 I don't fear

01:01:27.280 it.

01:01:28.800 I avoid it.

01:01:30.660 Isn't that

01:01:31.320 different?

01:01:32.120 I don't want to

01:01:32.920 go outdoors where

01:01:35.040 death is a

01:01:36.120 possibility.

01:01:36.820 It's not because

01:01:37.260 I'm afraid of

01:01:37.920 it.

01:01:38.160 It's because

01:01:38.620 dying is not

01:01:40.020 on my wish

01:01:41.080 list.

01:01:41.380 California has

01:01:46.420 banned gas

01:01:47.120 powered engines

01:01:47.820 starting in

01:01:48.700 2024.

01:01:49.540 That doesn't

01:01:49.880 sound right.

01:01:52.800 Are the

01:01:53.180 desalinization

01:01:54.060 plants going?

01:01:54.960 I don't think

01:01:55.420 there are any.

01:01:56.920 Dude, you don't

01:01:57.800 go outside.

01:01:59.200 Oh, you'd be

01:01:59.900 surprised.

01:02:00.380 I'll watch

01:02:03.520 the McCullough

01:02:04.180 playback today.

01:02:05.760 I guess I have

01:02:06.380 to go to

01:02:06.640 Spotify for

01:02:07.280 that, right?

01:02:08.720 That's a

01:02:09.080 Spotify thing.

01:02:12.720 It's just a

01:02:13.420 small engine

01:02:13.940 band in

01:02:14.360 California.

01:02:14.840 That sounds

01:02:15.220 more right.

01:02:20.900 Oh, and

01:02:21.740 generators.

01:02:22.440 That's right.

01:02:22.760 Gas generators.

01:02:24.180 Oh, leaf

01:02:24.980 blowers.

01:02:25.420 Oh, I don't

01:02:27.300 know.

01:02:27.540 Are the

01:02:27.760 electric ones

01:02:28.320 any better?

01:02:30.380 All right.

01:02:37.040 No gas

01:02:37.860 generators.

01:02:38.580 Interesting.

01:02:39.700 But that's

01:02:40.040 gasoline, right?

01:02:41.660 That's not

01:02:42.180 gas as in

01:02:43.440 the gas that

01:02:46.040 runs your

01:02:46.440 stove.

01:02:49.620 Does

01:02:50.120 Christina ever

01:02:50.840 talk about

01:02:51.320 going to

01:02:51.720 space?

01:02:52.060 She would

01:02:52.340 go in a

01:02:52.660 heartbeat.

01:02:53.520 Yeah.

01:02:53.820 She actually

01:02:54.480 said she

01:02:54.940 would go to

01:02:55.340 Mars.

01:02:57.540 She likes

01:02:58.240 that stuff.

01:03:00.380 All right.

01:03:00.980 That's all

01:03:01.300 for now.

01:03:02.400 And I

01:03:03.720 would like

01:03:04.020 to take

01:03:04.340 my leave

01:03:04.740 now and

01:03:05.320 do some

01:03:05.620 other things.

01:03:06.900 I think

01:03:07.360 you'll agree

01:03:07.760 this is the

01:03:08.280 best thing

01:03:08.640 you've ever

01:03:09.020 done in

01:03:09.340 your life.

01:03:10.540 I'm going to

01:03:10.860 turn it off

01:03:11.380 before I see

01:03:12.020 any disagreements.

01:03:13.460 But go

01:03:14.840 forth and have

01:03:15.680 a Merry

01:03:16.240 Christmas.

01:03:17.360 I'll talk to

01:03:17.900 you tomorrow.

01:03:18.640 to

01:03:34.320 a

01:03:34.800 a

01:03:35.280 a

01:03:35.760 okay

01:03:36.400 you

01:03:36.520 you

01:03:37.180 you

01:03:37.540 you

01:03:38.220 you

01:03:38.260 you

01:03:38.520 you

01:03:39.320 you

01:03:40.400 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 15, 2021

Episode 1593 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About the Funny Stuff in the News Today

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript