Episode 1606 Scott Adams: How Trump Can Win in 2024 With High Ground Persuasion Persuasion
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
148.02742
Summary
The dopamine hit of the day comes in the form of the most powerful, non-fear-inducing technique known to man, the "high ground" Maneuver. Plus, Rose McGowan has a new tweet about Hillary Clinton.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that ever happened to you in your whole damn life.
00:00:05.420
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and it features the Simultaneous Sip, which I know some of you try to skip.
00:00:12.380
Some of you mute it, and some of you fast-forward.
00:00:17.680
But that's okay, because it's a free world, and you can get your vaccination, and you can not,
00:00:22.960
or you can listen to the Simultaneous Sip, or not.
00:00:27.380
But, if you'd like to participate, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice,
00:00:31.600
or a scythe, a canteen, a jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind.
00:00:38.440
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:01:13.780
All right, well, today actually will be the most exciting and awesome live stream that you have ever seen in your whole damn life.
00:01:22.300
I'm going to teach you a technique, which I mention often, but the more examples you see, the better you'll be able to do it in your own life.
00:01:36.840
So powerful, I've never seen it not work, and when I've used it in person, I can't tell if other people use it successfully, but it kind of works every time.
00:01:49.600
And there's nothing like that in persuasion except, you know, maybe fear.
00:01:53.820
If you ramp up the fear enough, you can make anything happen.
00:01:56.280
But for a non-fear persuasion, the High Ground technique just beats everything, every time.
00:02:05.440
And almost instantly, you don't even have to wait.
00:02:08.480
It's not like the simultaneous sip, where it's a small thing that accumulates over time.
00:02:14.840
The High Ground Maneuver instantly flips people to your point of view.
00:02:20.680
And I'm going to give you some examples as we go.
00:02:25.040
Rasmussen has a new poll, says Biden's handling of crime and law enforcement issues.
00:02:31.620
51% say he's doing a poor job on crime and law enforcement.
00:02:36.560
How would you like to run against any Republican when you're underwater on crime and law enforcement?
00:02:47.800
And I was actually surprised that it's only 51%.
00:02:52.980
Rasmussen also polled people on Biden's handling of immigration.
00:03:03.260
Again, tough to run against a Republican, any Republican, with these kinds of numbers.
00:03:09.440
I don't know if you saw this next story, but there's something going to happen.
00:03:36.480
And unfortunately, there's nothing you can say about it.
00:03:39.960
The tweet just will sit there as its own story.
00:03:50.660
Hillary Clinton, you are a shadow leader in service of evil.
00:03:54.580
You are the enemy of what is good, right, and moral.
00:04:05.040
I've been in a hotel room with your husband, and here comes the bomb.
00:04:19.860
Is Rose McGowan good at writing and capturing her imagination?
00:04:25.500
I'm just going to read this again, but only for the writing, okay?
00:04:31.020
So, you know, the issue itself is just red meat.
00:04:40.500
Hillary Clinton, you are a shadow leader in service of evil.
00:04:43.740
You are the enemy of what is good, right, and moral.
00:04:53.200
I've been in a hotel room with your husband, and here comes the bomb.
00:04:59.140
I don't know if anybody's ever written a better tweet than that.
00:05:08.440
I mean, it's good writing in the context of a tweet, right?
00:05:55.720
I wonder why people were talking about it today.
00:06:07.840
One of the mistakes I make a lot is not checking the date on stuff.
00:06:25.140
So, Democrats, as you know, consider climate change their biggest priority, biggest issue
00:06:32.120
And if you were a Democrat and you thought it was your biggest issue in the world, who
00:06:37.140
would you choose as your leaders to deal with the biggest issue in the world?
00:06:41.160
Well, apparently two of the leaders in this movement are Joe Biden, of course, and then
00:06:54.120
And she said she insulted his leadership on climate.
00:07:01.380
And I thought to myself, all right, so you've got two people who are identified as the main
00:07:09.120
The president, who happens to be a Democrat, and Greta.
00:07:15.920
Well, at Joe Biden's age, I think it's fair to say that his brain is past its sell-by date.
00:07:46.600
And your brain develops fully by the time you are fill-in-the-blank.
00:07:51.640
Your brain is considered fully developed when you are 25, right?
00:07:58.080
So the two leaders on the biggest issue for the Democrats are a man with a brain that is well past its expiration date
00:08:06.340
and a young woman with a brain that has not reached maturity, according to science.
00:08:13.000
So the party of science is using us as their leaders to fight the biggest scientific challenge, according to them,
00:08:22.460
by picking the people that science says don't have the capability to do this kind of work.
00:08:35.300
Is there anything in this story that I just made up?
00:08:39.560
There's no question that Greta's brain is not developed,
00:08:42.640
and I don't think there's really any question that Biden's at an age where things slow down.
00:08:47.260
I mean, Dr. Drew was saying last night that even at his age,
00:08:52.140
and his age is, you know, he's a little younger than I am, but we're pretty close,
00:08:58.040
Like, if I were to run for president, I ask myself,
00:09:02.440
oh, you know, is age going to have an effect on that?
00:09:07.120
My capability is much greater than it's ever been,
00:09:09.700
but definitely age is starting to have an effect.
00:09:12.840
When I was younger, I would have checked the date on that Rose McGowan story.
00:09:28.660
I'm going to give you a reframe that you're going to love.
00:09:36.900
By the way, should I write a book on reframing?
00:09:46.560
You know, I worry that it would be too repetitive of things I've done
00:09:52.560
but there's something about the idea of reframing how you see things
00:10:04.980
Okay, I'm going to talk to my publishing people in January
00:10:15.860
If I write another book again, it's going to be for you.
00:10:22.620
It's like three years of your life that you can't get back.
00:10:26.060
I mean, writing books is exactly as hard as it looks, right?
00:10:33.480
because an author will come out with one every year,
00:10:38.420
So it looks like it's probably easier than it is.
00:10:41.200
But let me tell you, writing a book is as hard as it looks.
00:10:50.100
because I do think that the topic is just so, so useful.
00:10:54.240
It's just so useful, I'm not sure that I can not write it.
00:10:58.280
You almost have a moral obligation at some point.
00:11:01.840
So I'm starting to feel that pull, and I wish I didn't.
00:11:08.420
When it comes to a citizen of the United States,
00:11:12.840
and let's say that citizen is accused of a crime,
00:11:16.180
do we accept the standard that that citizen is innocent until proven guilty?
00:11:27.400
Not only do we universally accept that innocent until proven guilty
00:11:40.000
we accept as part of that that sometimes we'll get it wrong,
00:11:47.180
and that we take that explicitly as an acceptable trade-off,
00:11:51.680
and that we've all thought about it extensively,
00:12:15.520
or else we're just going to treat you like you're innocent.
00:12:22.100
It's one of the most basic pieces of code that runs in your head.
00:12:26.620
It's like a narrative that's like a piece of programming,
00:12:29.660
and we all have it in the United States anyway.
00:12:36.140
What happens when the citizens are judging the government?
00:12:44.400
innocent until proven guilty just has to be the standard.
00:12:50.680
What if the citizens, collectively or individually,
00:13:00.540
Is the government innocent until proven guilty?
00:13:31.280
have questions about the fairness of the election,
00:13:53.600
Give you time to get your kids out of the room?
00:14:16.800
If your election system can't be audited by design,
00:14:38.080
Your government needs to prove the election was fair,
00:14:45.800
tell you that you didn't prove the election was fraudulent in court,
00:14:56.340
We don't need to prove a fucking thing to the government.
00:15:11.340
The assumption has to be that it was fraudulent.
00:15:17.280
because I lack any evidence that would prove it.
00:15:25.560
The government needs to prove it's a fair fucking election,
00:15:32.280
and you haven't, you don't get the assumption of innocence.
00:15:50.140
is the assumption of innocence until proven guilty.
00:16:00.260
You've got to fucking prove you're not screwing us.
00:16:13.140
for being relatively quiet on the January 6th committee,
00:17:12.180
Yeah, and the bad guys had matching megaphones,
00:17:34.000
Like, if the videos are telling the true story,