Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1648 Scott Adams： Governments Are Failing and the Public is Taking Over Everywhere

00:00:00.560 To undoubtedly a peak experience in your life. I'm talking gold metal experience here.

00:00:08.960 Not sulfur, not copper. Gold metal, all the way. And if you'd like to take it up to whatever is

00:00:14.560 beyond that, and it's almost beyond imagination, all you need is a, oh it's a bronze, okay,

00:00:21.680 you don't want that either. All you need is a copper, margarita glass, a tanker,

00:00:25.360 chalice is trying to get to each other glass vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:31.680 Oh, we've got a problem with the audio, which I'm going to fix.

00:00:37.760 Right now, because I think I know that problem. Hold on.

00:00:45.040 All right, YouTube, with any luck, what I just did fixed your sound. Anybody? Anybody? All right, well,

00:00:55.440 so we're still bad on YouTube. Interesting. Let's see. I've got, oh, I know the problem.

00:01:07.680 Air gap. Maybe if I plugged it in.

00:01:15.680 How about now? Anybody? Anybody?

00:01:19.120 All right. So here's something to learn, you know, sort of a learning moment.

00:01:30.480 The reason I use iPads instead of other things is that I just keep them on and just set up all the

00:01:35.920 time. If you make any change to your setup, you end up with this. And yesterday I said to myself,

00:01:41.840 you know, I wouldn't mind watching a show while I'm doing some drawing. So I changed one thing on one

00:01:48.400 iPad and forgot to change it back. Don't ever be like me. But how would you like to simultaneous sip?

00:01:56.800 Sip interruptage. We're going to take it up from where we began. Go.

00:02:01.840 Well, I'm pretty sure the rest of the show will be better than that rocky start. According to a

00:02:13.280 Rasmussen poll, 58% of the public agree that the media is the enemy of the people. Now, this is similar

00:02:21.280 to how it's been in prior months. But every time I see this, I just shake my head. How much of this was

00:02:29.280 just Trump? Do you remember in the earliest days when people were mocking me for saying that Trump

00:02:35.840 was persuasive? And oh, my God, the level of hate I got for suggesting that whether you liked him or

00:02:46.640 didn't like him, whether you liked his policies or not, the one thing you couldn't deny is that he was

00:02:52.640 persuasive. And now 58% of the people think the news is fake. That was him. Am I wrong? I mean,

00:03:02.160 it was all of us two, you know, piling on. But I don't think we would be even half of that number

00:03:08.880 without Trump specifically. I don't think anybody's ever been more persuasive than that. I mean,

00:03:14.320 that is a big deal. So let's, we'll talk about some of the news's performance here as we go.

00:03:23.360 The latest story is that lots of news entities are reporting that Trump, quote, improperly,

00:03:30.080 improperly, I say, removed documents from the White House and stored them at Mar-a-Lago.

00:03:36.100 Some of them included stuff like the so-called love letters with Kim Jong-un

00:03:41.120 and some other stuff. And all I have to say about this is, the walls are closing in on Trump.

00:03:51.920 Yeah, you thought Russia collusion was going to take him down? It didn't. We were all amazed.

00:03:58.080 You thought grab him by the, we're going to keep him from being president? Nope. Didn't stop him a bit.

00:04:05.120 Did you think that the fake news about Charlottesville and drinking bleach fake news,

00:04:08.940 did you think they were going to take him out? Nope. Uh, he escaped all that. What about his legal

00:04:15.180 problems with his, his taxes and his, his, uh, well, mostly his taxes? Yeah, so far doesn't look like

00:04:23.740 anything. Well, but, uh, you know, what about, uh, Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniel? Well, yeah,

00:04:30.140 it didn't really seem to make much difference in the end. What about all the, I don't know. I think

00:04:36.700 we're down to this, aren't we? That bastard improperly took documents, which are almost certainly 0.97

00:04:47.340 digitally saved somewhere anyway. Am I wrong in assuming that every document is digitally 0.97

00:04:53.100 archived no matter whether you have the document or not? Am I wrong about that? Don't you think?

00:04:59.740 Wouldn't everything be digitally archived at this point? I don't know. So I don't even know what it

00:05:05.420 means to take a document out of the, out of the White House once it's been digitally stored. And I'm

00:05:11.660 just guessing, I mean, I'm just guessing they would all be digitally archived. Um, but it seems reasonable.

00:05:17.100 So this is what it's come to. All, all of the, uh, insurrection talk, everything, it all came down to,

00:05:27.980 well, I think some of those documents that we have digital pictures of have been improperly,

00:05:33.420 improperly stored. What are we going to do to fix this situation? Oh, we just took them back where

00:05:40.220 they were supposed to be. That was it. That was it. Um, so Trump gave Joe Rogan some advice. Trump did a, uh,

00:05:53.100 press release. And because it's Trump, I'm going to read his exact words. Because nobody writes

00:05:59.660 like he writes. You could not write in his voice if you tried. I mean, it would look like it was

00:06:05.100 obviously a joke. But I swear to it, nobody writes like he does. Nobody. And it is really sensational

00:06:10.860 writing. From, take it from a professional writer, if you could write as well as Trump does,

00:06:17.980 you would be a best-selling author. He does, he does write at that level. It's just that he does it so,

00:06:24.300 in such a sort of a folksy, plain manner, that you don't take it that way. But it's brilliant writing.

00:06:29.820 So, so here's what he said in a, uh, press release. Rogan is an interesting and popular guy. But he's

00:06:37.180 got to stop apologizing to the fake news and radical left maniacs and lunatics. How many ways can you say 0.96

00:06:43.180 you're sorry? Joe, uh, just go about what you do so well and don't let them make you look weak and

00:06:49.420 frightened. That's not you and never will be. So, that's very Trumpy. And it's, it's well-written in a

00:06:58.540 Trump style. So, I like everything about that. I like, you know, every, basically persuasion-wise,

00:07:05.680 writing-wise, communication-wise, it's just an A+. But here's my take on it. Remember I said that

00:07:13.880 you should be careful about giving Joe Rogan advice? Because of the obvious reason? Whatever

00:07:20.740 decisions Joe Rogan makes got him to where he is. And whatever decisions you make in life got you to

00:07:26.560 where you are. Who's doing better? If you're doing better than Joe Rogan, well, maybe you would be

00:07:33.760 exactly the person to give him some advice. But if you're not, maybe be a little humble about the value

00:07:42.580 of your advice versus the value of his own opinions, right? Now, here's my take on his apology.

00:07:49.200 Some of you said it is strategically bad to apologize. And I get that. So, I'm not going

00:07:57.360 to disagree with you on the strategy. So, strategically, it probably is a bad idea to look weak and apologize.

00:08:05.120 But here's the thing I think everybody's overlooking. What if he meant it? Well, why,

00:08:12.340 why do we even, why do we discount, let me think about this. We kind of discount the possibility that

00:08:19.480 he was sincere. Why? Why, why is, what is it that Joe Rogan has ever done in his, at least,

00:08:28.900 public life that we know about? What has he ever done that would suggest he would give an insincere

00:08:34.660 apology? I can't think of anything. That would be inconsistent with basically everything we know

00:08:42.360 about him. Now, that doesn't mean, you know, we're right or we could read his mind or any of that.

00:08:47.580 But just in terms of consistency, he is, and one of the reasons he's so popular, he's one of the most

00:08:54.740 most credible people in the world. Credible in the sense that you think you'll give an honest opinion,

00:09:01.220 even if he's wrong. Here's my take. I don't think he apologized for economic reasons. There was an

00:09:09.440 economic reason. But I think he actually felt it. Did you, did you get the sense that he was

00:09:15.580 apologizing fakely? I didn't get that at all. I think that he was genuinely unhappy with how it

00:09:25.040 looked. I think he was, again, we're, we can't read his mind, but I'm just, the only thing we can look

00:09:30.680 at is the consistency in his history. If the history and the consistency suggests that any

00:09:37.580 apology he gives actually he means, that is none of our business. It isn't. It's not Trump's business.

00:09:45.740 It's not my business. It's not your business. If, if he felt, and I'm just saying if, because we'd have

00:09:52.580 to speculate about his inner thoughts, but if he thought that he honestly owed an apology,

00:09:58.400 that's the end of the conversation. It doesn't matter if it's strategically smart. It really

00:10:06.080 doesn't. Because it's, it's not our lives, it's not our lives to manage. And it's not us, it's not up

00:10:12.380 to us to decide, should he put a strategy over his own just sense of what is right or wrong?

00:10:18.620 Well, I don't know. I get that strategically it was suboptimal, but maybe it wasn't. Maybe it wasn't.

00:10:30.280 Because again, if my podcast, if my podcast were anywhere near the successes of his, I would say,

00:10:40.520 well, you should take my opinion on everything. Look at what I've done. But again, maybe being genuine

00:10:47.680 and apologizing in a way that, at least to me, looked completely genuine, maybe that is the

00:10:53.300 very best thing to do. How would you know? Right? If it's an opinion, and his opinions got him to

00:11:01.860 where he is, and your opinions got you to where you are, I don't know. I think I would defer to his

00:11:07.000 opinion on whether an apology was necessary or useful. And keep in mind that, you know, he's also

00:11:13.500 solving personal issues beyond the business model, right? Because this was a problem that was not just

00:11:21.240 a business problem, it was a personal problem. So I don't judge him good or bad, effective or

00:11:28.380 ineffective. To me, that looked like something he thought he needed to do. And if he thought he

00:11:33.580 needed to do it, that's the end of the question, isn't it? It should be. It should be the very end of

00:11:40.900 it. It's like, oh, he thought that was a good idea. He did it for himself. If he's happy with it,

00:11:46.900 I'm happy with it.

00:11:50.720 If you don't brainwash your own kids, what's going to happen?

00:11:55.780 They don't grow up being independent thinkers. That's not an option. If you don't brainwash your

00:12:03.340 kids, somebody's going to do it. The school is going to do it, social media is going to do it,

00:12:07.900 etc. And I think that in our modern world, we've kind of delegated the brainwashing to the schools

00:12:14.420 and the news and social media and their friends and stuff. So at the point, at this point, kids are

00:12:20.820 just like free range chickens, it seems like. You know, they leave the house to go to school in the

00:12:27.280 morning. They come home, they're with their friends, they're doing homework. You may or may not even see

00:12:32.500 them before they go to bed. You might not eat a meal together. You know, they're sort of being

00:12:37.980 socialized without your parental guidance in a lot of cases. But how much damage is that? Well,

00:12:46.520 it turns out that there's some thoughts by the professionals that TikTok in particular

00:12:51.740 is super dangerous, especially to young females. So here's a quote from one expert, Paul Sonseri,

00:13:01.020 a psychologist. And he says a quote for, I think this was on CNN. He said, for a young girl who's

00:13:10.320 developing her identity to be swept up into a sexual world, talking about TikTok videos, like that is

00:13:17.000 hugely destructive. But he also said, when teen girls are rewarded for their sexuality, they come

00:13:25.720 to believe that their value is in how they look, he said. He said approximately a quarter of the

00:13:31.320 female patients at his clinic have produced sexualized content on TikTok. Now, I wouldn't trust

00:13:37.780 that percentage, because something tells me that a quarter of everybody who's ever, a quarter of all

00:13:45.220 females probably have made sexually suggestive content on TikTok, right? A quarter of the people 1.00

00:13:51.220 using TikTok. That sounds like just probably the right number of people in general. And it's the 25% 0.98

00:14:00.160 again, yeah, the magic 25%. So do you believe this? Do you take this as sort of obviously true? Or would

00:14:11.100 you need some more science to make the case? To me, I would say this is obviously true.

00:14:18.300 It looks obviously true. The kids are obsessed by looks and sex appeal, obsessed. But are teenagers

00:14:29.860 always obsessed by that? Maybe they always were. Does it really make it worse? Probably, because it's so

00:14:37.280 visual and so overwhelmingly there all the time. So I would imagine that just the fact that it's visual

00:14:43.980 and the fact that you spend so much time on it probably causes problems. Now, here's a prediction.

00:14:53.360 You know, I've made some unusual predictions way outside the mainstream. I'm going to make a way

00:14:59.880 outside the mainstream prediction that social media will eventually be banned for children under a

00:15:07.280 certain age. Now, at the moment, you'd say to yourself, that can't happen because the social

00:15:12.740 media companies are just too powerful. They can just make sure they don't get banned.

00:15:17.020 I don't think so. I think that over time, it will become so obvious that it's child abuse. Actual child

00:15:27.080 abuse. That as soon as somebody frames it as child abuse, maybe I just did, it's sort of a one-way trip

00:15:36.520 after that. You can't really come back from that. I think the science is going to be overwhelmingly

00:15:43.720 certain that social media is absolutely dangerous for developing minds. Or maybe there needs to be

00:15:54.620 some crippled version of social media or something. But the age should be set around 70. You're safe 1.00

00:16:03.880 after about 70. I think 21. Yeah. I think age 21 would be about right for legal social media access.

00:16:17.860 All right. By the way, does anybody agree with my prediction? How many of you think it will happen?

00:16:25.780 Because I would think most of you would disagree with that. See some yeses and nos. No, no.

00:16:33.880 It's going to be hard. Yeah, the power of the social media companies is pretty great. And they can

00:16:38.520 make us not know that what they're doing is bad for us. So they control the harm, but also the

00:16:46.080 information about the harm. So you won't know how much damage there is if they don't tell you.

00:16:51.900 And it's not in their interest to tell you. So here's the question that I think is fascinating

00:16:58.020 about the Ukraine situation. So Putin sort of painted himself in the corner there. He can't

00:17:03.220 really attack without bad things happening to Russia. And he can't not attack. So what's he

00:17:09.660 going to do? And here's a question I ask. What does war look like in 2022 if the highest advanced

00:17:19.680 countries are involved? You know, the countries that can produce the best weapons? What happens

00:17:26.380 if two of them, or at least, you know, even if it's a proxy war? What if the best weapons

00:17:33.780 are turned against the armies of the other? Because the Ukrainians might not have access to

00:17:39.040 the best weapons. Or maybe they do. Would we know? Do you think we would know in public

00:17:46.460 what secret new, really good weapons the Ukrainians will have access to? They shouldn't tell us. 1.00

00:17:55.320 If we know, then maybe it's in the, you know, in the context of trying to convince Russia not

00:18:02.440 to attack. But I feel like it's obvious things are going to go poorly if they attack. I think

00:18:08.680 Putin must know that. It's going to be expensive. So here's what I'm wondering is going to happen.

00:18:16.460 Number one, if Putin attacks the capital of Ukraine, wouldn't you say that he's attacking

00:18:25.060 a civilian population? You would, right? If he takes over a city, especially the capital, 0.97

00:18:34.960 it's not really army on army. It's going to be mass casualties of civilians. If that happens,

00:18:41.540 do you think that the Ukraine, the Ukrainian people, have a moral, a moral, let's say,

00:18:51.000 let's say, are they morally, I guess it's never moral. Do you think that they would return the

00:19:01.360 favor? Do you think that the Ukrainians would attack a Russian city? Now, probably not with a straight

00:19:08.580 military attack, because that would be a little difficult to pull off. But you don't think that

00:19:14.000 there are already Ukrainian operatives in Russia? I would assume so, right? I would assume that

00:19:22.500 they've penetrated Russia. It wouldn't be that hard, especially if they have a lot of Russian-speaking

00:19:26.780 people. They look the same, speak the same. So what would happen if these alleged speculative

00:19:36.860 Ukrainians who wanted to give as good as they're getting decided to take Moscow out and they had

00:19:43.240 access to the best weaponry and strategies of the United States? I'm not saying that's true.

00:19:50.940 I'm saying, seems likely. It seems likely that the Ukrainians would want to attack directly into 1.00

00:19:59.500 the heart of Russia to make it really hurt. I mean, if it's all out war, it's all out war, am I right? 0.73

00:20:06.340 If it's all out war, Ukrainians can attack Moscow, the population. They can. And what would they do to, 0.96

00:20:14.760 how would they do that? Well, I would do it with drones. If you had one drone per each Ukrainian 1.00

00:20:23.600 operative, and you had, say, dozens of operatives, and they all released their suicide drones at the

00:20:31.800 same time, I'm not talking about the big ones that are the size of aircraft. I'm talking about the ones

00:20:37.600 that can carry enough weight to take out a sizable floor of a building, let's say.

00:20:46.240 I don't know how many of them they would have to drop on Moscow before Moscow said, we're out.

00:20:53.220 We don't support this war. I don't know if they support it or if it matters. But I feel like

00:20:58.660 Russia has to calculate a certain amount of destruction in Moscow as part of their calculation.

00:21:05.940 Am I wrong? Is there any part of what I said is wrong? And I'll just put it in more general terms.

00:21:14.520 Number one, does Ukraine have a right to attack a population center in Russia? I say yes. 0.99

00:21:20.620 Anybody disagree? Only if they get attacked first. Does anybody disagree that they would have the right

00:21:27.100 to attack a population center? Any disagreement at all? I don't think so, right? That's war.

00:21:34.920 The reason you don't go to war is that, right? I mean, more than anything, it's that one thing,

00:21:42.680 because it always happens. Yes. So if they have the right to attack, do they have the ability?

00:21:48.260 Well, I think the ability would depend on how well they could penetrate Russia. And given that they

00:21:54.040 look Russian, they speak Russian, they're on the border, probably, right? You know, why would the 1.00

00:22:02.520 Ukrainians not have operatives in Russia? It doesn't make sense. Russia has plenty of operatives in

00:22:07.180 Ukraine, one assumes. And so if you know those two things are true, they would have the right and the,

00:22:15.520 let's say, the incentive to attack Moscow population center. They would certainly have the people. 0.96

00:22:21.740 all they would need is the technology. That's all they would need. The technology exists.

00:22:30.800 All they would need is somebody to give it to them. Could the United States, you know, covertly,

00:22:37.780 supply suicide drones to Ukrainian operatives? Totally. Does anybody think they couldn't do that? 0.98

00:22:45.580 Now, I'm not saying they would. And maybe the United States doesn't even need to be involved.

00:22:51.920 Maybe the Ukrainians can get all the drones they want just through, I don't know, black market or 1.00

00:22:55.920 whatever. So I have a feeling that Putin's going to have to look at a lot of destruction in Moscow

00:23:04.060 as the cost of attacking Ukraine. And by the way, the Ukrainians should say that directly.

00:23:10.500 They should say that directly. They should say that Moscow is a target if there's an invasion.

00:23:18.240 They don't have to give any details. Just say it clearly. If we're attacked, if you take over our

00:23:25.660 capital, you're going to lose the capital building in Moscow, or I don't know, wherever the capital is.

00:23:31.940 Who knows? They should put a target list out and say, you're going to lose these targets.

00:23:37.320 We're going to take out this, this, and this, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.

00:23:43.120 Not with suicide drones, right? If they have suicide drones, there's nothing they can do to stop it.

00:23:48.440 So they can just tell you what the cost is. We're going to take out your tallest building.

00:23:53.000 We're going to take out your government building. And then name a few others. Military headquarters,

00:23:59.440 whatever. Anyway, I don't think Putin's going to attack.

00:24:04.660 I don't think he's going to attack. And this would just be one of the reasons.

00:24:11.980 But I could be wrong about that. The mandates seem to be bending, if not breaking.

00:24:19.520 So a number of states have now announced masking will go away. They've given dates.

00:24:24.860 Our own Governor Newsom has said that indoor masking will partially go away in terms of the state's

00:24:32.780 mandates. So the schools and the, I guess, the towns or counties can still mandate stuff.

00:24:40.100 But the state of California will be out of the mandating business for masks as of February 15th.

00:24:48.780 Now, let's say you lived in California. And you knew that, what's today, the 8th?

00:24:58.660 If you knew in one week that the mask mandate was going to be dropped, are you going to wear

00:25:04.760 your mask between now and the 15th?

00:25:08.100 My mask, I haven't worn my mask since the 1st.

00:25:11.860 You know, I told you all that that was my last day.

00:25:15.280 So I wore it once in a doctor's office.

00:25:18.660 That was really just a sign of respect.

00:25:20.940 It had nothing to do with anything else.

00:25:22.740 And it was brief, so I didn't care.

00:25:25.200 So,

00:25:26.460 do you think that February 14th,

00:25:30.780 on Valentine's Day,

00:25:32.580 that people are going to wear masks when they go out to eat?

00:25:35.980 Well, I mean, we don't really,

00:25:37.860 in California, nobody really wore masks to eat anyway.

00:25:40.600 So, you know, you just walk past the hostess at that point.

00:25:47.040 So I would say that the governor really had no choice,

00:25:50.360 Governor Newsom, in at least letting the mandates expire,

00:25:54.180 because he got caught without his mask in a very public way.

00:25:57.680 We all saw that story.

00:25:59.020 So I don't think he could extend it.

00:26:01.020 I think it was politically impossible for him to extend it.

00:26:04.960 But here's what I do think. 1.00

00:26:06.620 Waiting until the 15th is weak and stupid 1.00

00:26:09.160 and is just a big fuck you. 1.00

00:26:12.580 Am I right? 1.00

00:26:13.780 Like, on one hand,

00:26:15.280 I want to support the governor

00:26:18.640 in ending the mandates.

00:26:20.860 So part of my instinct is,

00:26:22.880 yay, you're ending the mandates. 0.99

00:26:25.300 But then I start thinking

00:26:26.880 with my actual brain and stuff.

00:26:29.380 And I say,

00:26:30.480 really, are you telling me that waiting this extra week

00:26:33.040 is going to make a difference?

00:26:37.000 Nobody believes that.

00:26:39.040 Literally no one, no one,

00:26:41.560 no one in the whole world

00:26:42.960 believes that that extra week

00:26:45.260 is going to make a difference.

00:26:47.140 So, Governor Newsom, 1.00

00:26:49.820 you fucking dick. 1.00

00:26:53.340 End it today. 1.00

00:26:55.460 You're just being a fucking dick 1.00

00:26:58.220 if you don't end it today. 1.00

00:27:00.320 And guess what?

00:27:01.760 It's over today. 1.00

00:27:03.240 Because you're a fucking dick. 1.00

00:27:06.420 Right? 1.00

00:27:06.840 The only reason he's not ending it today

00:27:09.020 is because it's going to time out anyway. 1.00

00:27:12.140 And he's a fucking pussy. 1.00

00:27:13.780 And he's just going to let it time out 1.00

00:27:15.200 so he doesn't have to make an actual decision.

00:27:17.280 It'll look like a non-decision, right? 1.00

00:27:20.100 What a weak, weak, pathetic way to run a state. 1.00

00:27:27.180 Pathetic. 1.00

00:27:27.620 If you're deciding it's going to be gone next week, 1.00

00:27:31.200 it's fucking gone now. 0.99

00:27:32.980 Just admit it. 0.99

00:27:34.120 It's fucking over. 1.00

00:27:36.340 I'm not going to wear a fucking mask for a week. 1.00

00:27:41.480 Well, I wasn't going to wear one anyway. 0.99

00:27:43.700 But who is going to wear a mask for a week

00:27:46.820 when you know it's already over? 1.00

00:27:49.140 You're just being an asshole at this point. 1.00

00:27:52.880 All right? 1.00

00:27:53.640 It's one thing to follow the science.

00:27:56.180 And I get the fact that, you know,

00:27:57.740 there's some judgment involved.

00:27:59.600 But once you've decided to end the mask mandate,

00:28:03.640 just get it over with. 1.00

00:28:05.420 Pull the fucking band-aid off. 1.00

00:28:07.540 Why do you have to leave the scab for the public? 1.00

00:28:10.540 Right?

00:28:11.060 Why does the public have to pick off the scab?

00:28:13.880 Sorry, mixing analogies here.

00:28:15.820 But this is incompetence at a level 1.00

00:28:18.400 that's just fuck you in your face. 1.00

00:28:21.280 Right? 1.00

00:28:21.840 It's one thing to make a mistake

00:28:23.360 and you're not sure who's doing the right thing.

00:28:25.980 You're on one team

00:28:27.080 and you wish it would go this way.

00:28:28.400 This isn't like that.

00:28:30.360 This has nothing to do with teamwork, politics, priorities. 1.00

00:28:34.200 This is just fuck you. 1.00

00:28:36.420 That's all it is. 1.00

00:28:37.940 This is just fuck you to the public. 1.00

00:28:39.720 Anybody disagree? 1.00

00:28:44.580 Anybody?

00:28:45.600 Does anybody disagree? 1.00

00:28:47.020 This is a pure fuck you. 1.00

00:28:49.540 And it's put in the form 1.00

00:28:53.760 of they're doing us a fucking favor. 0.98

00:28:56.760 Yeah, thank you for dropping 1.00

00:28:58.040 the fucking mask mandate 0.99

00:29:01.420 that shouldn't have been there. 0.99

00:29:02.600 And you can't do it today?

00:29:05.040 It's over today, Californians.

00:29:08.180 Californians, listen to me.

00:29:11.420 Don't put on your masks.

00:29:14.060 Just don't do it.

00:29:15.640 It's over.

00:29:17.200 Your leader just gave up.

00:29:19.360 All right?

00:29:19.700 He decided that he wasn't even going to try.

00:29:22.240 I don't know why.

00:29:23.120 I don't care why.

00:29:24.340 But if he's not going to even try, 0.99

00:29:26.780 masks are fucking done. 0.98

00:29:28.420 And let us stop pretending 0.99

00:29:32.780 that we're following the science.

00:29:36.140 Can we?

00:29:37.260 Can we stop pretending?

00:29:39.400 Because there's nothing about,

00:29:40.980 there's nothing like that happening.

00:29:42.340 When you see the CDC have a different opinion

00:29:44.460 than the governors,

00:29:45.760 every governor has a different opinion,

00:29:48.120 even when the situation is largely the same,

00:29:51.460 obviously following the science is not a thing.

00:29:54.680 It's obviously not a thing.

00:29:56.000 We should have learned that by now.

00:30:00.900 So the New York Times apparently is admitting that,

00:30:05.220 in a sense,

00:30:06.660 admitting that Ron DeSantis was right

00:30:08.580 about not masking kids.

00:30:10.780 So the New York Times is saying get rid of the masks.

00:30:12.880 CNN is saying get rid of the masks.

00:30:15.380 That seemed to be a big,

00:30:16.900 I mean, it seemed to be a change on CNN.

00:30:19.700 Maybe it's happened already.

00:30:21.560 Governors are dropping it in various states. 0.99

00:30:23.560 It is fucking over, Governor Newsom. 0.99

00:30:28.180 It's just fucking over. 1.00

00:30:31.100 You're just being an asshole at this point. 1.00

00:30:32.880 There's just no other way to express it. 1.00

00:30:35.000 It's not politics anymore.

00:30:36.920 It's not science.

00:30:37.820 It's not politics. 1.00

00:30:38.880 This is just asshole behavior. 1.00

00:30:41.080 Pure asshole behavior. 1.00

00:30:44.020 Right? 1.00

00:30:44.340 You take your fucking mask off at the game 1.00

00:30:47.220 and pose for pictures, 1.00

00:30:48.820 and then you make us wait a fucking week? 1.00

00:30:51.380 Uh-uh. 1.00

00:30:51.700 Uh-uh.

00:30:53.620 That is not politics,

00:30:55.140 and it's not science. 1.00

00:30:56.080 It's asshole behavior. 1.00

00:30:58.240 And you don't have to put up with it. 1.00

00:31:01.720 All right.

00:31:03.900 Doo-doo-doo. 1.00

00:31:09.120 So what do you think about science?

00:31:12.420 Is it fair to say at this point

00:31:17.920 that trust the science

00:31:20.180 is just a way to launder an opinion?

00:31:23.480 It is, right?

00:31:25.200 Because if trusting the science were a real thing,

00:31:28.380 all the governors would be ending the mask mandates.

00:31:32.320 The CDC would agree with all the governors

00:31:34.720 and all the experts

00:31:36.540 because they would just follow the science.

00:31:38.540 That was never a real thing.

00:31:41.680 Follow the real science was always propaganda.

00:31:44.220 It was never about reason or ration

00:31:46.720 because if we've learned anything,

00:31:49.000 it's that we can't tell what the science is

00:31:50.960 or where it's heading.

00:31:52.720 As long as it's human beings

00:31:54.420 who are interpreting what the science said,

00:31:56.640 we don't know what the science says.

00:31:58.880 We only know what a person said.

00:32:01.140 And people are not science.

00:32:03.060 People are whatever is the opposite of science.

00:32:05.000 So I think we should agree at this point

00:32:09.560 that we have proven

00:32:11.260 that following the science is a bad idea

00:32:13.320 when the public and the politicians

00:32:16.120 are interpreting what the science is.

00:32:18.320 And that's basically all the time.

00:32:21.240 Following the science is a good idea for who?

00:32:26.380 Follow the science is a good idea for scientists.

00:32:31.860 Right.

00:32:32.460 It's a great idea for scientists.

00:32:36.160 If you're a scientist,

00:32:37.480 you should probably follow the science.

00:32:39.700 I'd recommend it.

00:32:41.280 But if you're the public

00:32:42.760 and you know everybody's lying

00:32:44.120 about what the science is

00:32:45.180 or they can't tell what the science is,

00:32:47.480 then it is nothing but laundering of opinion.

00:32:51.360 They're using science to launder an opinion

00:32:53.600 to make it look like it's backed by something.

00:32:55.660 That's all it is.

00:32:56.680 It's just laundered opinions.

00:32:58.760 Fake news.

00:32:59.420 So Orange County will not be dropping the mask mandates

00:33:04.480 in California.

00:33:05.400 Oh, I'm sorry.

00:33:06.120 Orange County will drop the mandates,

00:33:08.440 as the governor is,

00:33:10.920 but not Los Angeles County.

00:33:13.960 So there's a director of whatever down there,

00:33:17.140 Barbara Farer.

00:33:18.820 She says L.A. County will not lift

00:33:20.640 this mask mandate on February 15th.

00:33:23.500 Because why?

00:33:24.400 She's following the science?

00:33:25.580 Does the governor have different science

00:33:28.780 than they have in L.A.? 1.00

00:33:30.640 This is asshole behavior. 1.00

00:33:35.080 It is asshole behavior. 1.00

00:33:37.080 We have to stop saying 1.00

00:33:38.720 this is science or politics.

00:33:40.900 This is not science.

00:33:42.600 This is not politics.

00:33:43.960 It's not even close. 1.00

00:33:45.300 It's just asshole behavior at this point. 1.00

00:33:48.460 Pure asshole behavior. 1.00

00:33:50.720 Nothing else. 1.00

00:33:51.360 And if you even imagine

00:33:53.760 or have a conversation with anybody

00:33:55.540 about science at this point,

00:33:58.580 you're wasting your time.

00:34:00.380 You should have a conversation 1.00

00:34:01.620 about who's being an asshole, 1.00

00:34:03.280 and that's it. 1.00

00:34:06.720 Speaking of assholes, 1.00

00:34:08.220 Biden's science advisor, Eric Lander, 0.99

00:34:10.260 quits over his behavior toward the staff.

00:34:13.260 Apparently,

00:34:14.300 in a perfect simulation-related story,

00:34:17.820 the guy who's the head science advisor

00:34:20.920 for the administration,

00:34:22.120 turns out to be,

00:34:23.400 wait for it,

00:34:25.200 wait for it,

00:34:27.040 Biden's science advisor, 1.00

00:34:29.200 turns out to be a gigantic asshole. 1.00

00:34:33.160 A gigantic asshole. 1.00

00:34:35.320 So much of an asshole 1.00

00:34:36.520 that he has to, like, 1.00

00:34:38.980 have special asshole requirements 1.00

00:34:41.280 around him just to keep his job. 1.00

00:34:43.600 Like, he needs the asshole guideline 1.00

00:34:45.420 or, you know, guardrails. 0.99

00:34:47.040 Be sure if I do anything

00:34:49.240 that offends you

00:34:49.980 that you tell somebody,

00:34:51.340 let me know right away.

00:34:53.320 And he keeps his job.

00:34:56.360 This was one of the promises

00:34:57.620 that Biden made us. 0.99

00:34:59.320 No assholes in his administration. 0.99

00:35:01.820 Then he kept one. 1.00

00:35:03.700 Why?

00:35:04.500 Because he probably needs

00:35:05.240 to launder his opinions

00:35:06.420 through the science.

00:35:07.400 That's why.

00:35:08.880 No, that's probably not why,

00:35:10.020 but it's funny to say.

00:35:11.520 So Rachel Maddow's on hiatus,

00:35:13.180 which basically takes out MSNBC 0.98

00:35:15.760 as a persuasive network.

00:35:20.900 As long as Rachel Maddow is out,

00:35:23.100 and it's not clear

00:35:23.960 that she'll come back permanently,

00:35:25.820 but as long as she's out,

00:35:27.900 and she has by far

00:35:28.720 the most popular show,

00:35:30.300 or did, on MSNBC,

00:35:32.700 MSNBC is going to become

00:35:34.640 a lot closer to irrelevant

00:35:37.700 in the next election cycle.

00:35:40.020 What about CNN?

00:35:43.180 Well, Rasmussen had a poll

00:35:44.540 asking how many people

00:35:46.060 regularly watch CNN.

00:35:48.460 Not many.

00:35:49.760 I don't remember the exact numbers,

00:35:51.760 but it's pretty small.

00:35:53.240 Not many.

00:35:54.900 So you've got CNN

00:35:55.760 that is filled with 0.99

00:35:57.400 sex criminals, allegedly, 0.97

00:36:00.860 and Zucker retiring,

00:36:03.020 and their reputation in tatters.

00:36:05.020 And not many people watch.

00:36:08.240 And they've got MSNBC,

00:36:09.600 which gutted itself

00:36:10.780 when Rachel Maddow

00:36:13.260 took her thing.

00:36:14.720 So at this point,

00:36:16.260 look at the relative power

00:36:18.220 of MSNBC plus CNN

00:36:21.060 compared to the last election cycle.

00:36:24.580 It's really different.

00:36:26.660 Now compare Fox News' influence.

00:36:28.720 Fox News is still strong.

00:36:32.340 Am I right?

00:36:33.960 And I would say at this point

00:36:35.500 that the media advantage

00:36:37.200 is just overwhelmingly

00:36:38.340 on the right

00:36:40.160 because the left

00:36:41.540 just sort of fell apart

00:36:42.460 on its own.

00:36:43.760 Nobody took the left down.

00:36:45.780 The left didn't need

00:36:46.600 to be taken down.

00:36:47.960 It just took itself down

00:36:49.180 for different reasons.

00:36:51.300 So I don't think

00:36:54.140 that we have come

00:36:55.200 to grips yet

00:36:57.040 with how big

00:36:57.740 of a difference

00:36:58.320 this could be.

00:36:59.400 Because remember,

00:37:00.220 nobody uses facts

00:37:01.600 and science

00:37:02.080 to make decisions.

00:37:03.340 We're all being brainwashed

00:37:04.800 by our favorite sources.

00:37:07.120 And here's the big sea change

00:37:09.220 that I don't think

00:37:09.940 has been recognized yet.

00:37:12.420 It's the reorganization

00:37:14.020 of America.

00:37:16.080 I keep saying that

00:37:17.360 in various contexts

00:37:18.820 because you keep seeing it

00:37:20.040 in different contexts.

00:37:21.300 everything is becoming

00:37:22.760 about Joe Rogan.

00:37:24.400 But it's not really

00:37:25.480 about Joe Rogan, is it?

00:37:27.960 You know what I mean?

00:37:29.020 Because when it's about Trump,

00:37:30.240 it's not really

00:37:30.940 always just about Trump.

00:37:33.340 It's like, you know,

00:37:34.540 they come to symbolize

00:37:36.220 a larger or something.

00:37:38.560 So Joe Rogan

00:37:39.460 represents credible,

00:37:44.020 credible in the sense

00:37:45.060 of honest,

00:37:46.060 not credible in the sense

00:37:47.200 of being right

00:37:47.800 about everything.

00:37:48.700 That's not a standard

00:37:49.600 anybody can meet.

00:37:51.300 Would you all agree?

00:37:52.800 That being right

00:37:53.720 about everything

00:37:54.440 is not really a standard

00:37:55.580 you'd expect people to meet.

00:37:57.880 Nobody's going to do that.

00:37:59.540 But you can at least

00:38:01.600 get credible.

00:38:03.240 You can at least

00:38:03.880 see both sides.

00:38:05.540 You can at least get

00:38:06.440 somebody honestly

00:38:07.480 trying to give you

00:38:08.300 the truth.

00:38:08.960 So I think the Roganization

00:38:10.860 of America is continuing,

00:38:13.060 meaning that the traditional media

00:38:15.520 will become less

00:38:16.400 and less important.

00:38:18.740 And the independent people,

00:38:22.960 such as Joe Rogan,

00:38:24.380 will become more important

00:38:25.980 and that there's a really

00:38:27.560 big change coming

00:38:28.460 into this next two elections.

00:38:31.020 Am I right?

00:38:31.640 I think that the podcaster voice

00:38:35.800 probably went from

00:38:38.160 20% of the persuasion

00:38:40.700 to, I think,

00:38:43.280 in this next cycle,

00:38:44.900 40% to 60%.

00:38:47.660 What would you say?

00:38:52.140 I think that's a really big change.

00:38:54.240 And I think a crossover

00:38:55.180 is going to happen.

00:38:56.320 The crossover

00:38:56.980 where the independent pundits

00:39:00.360 are going to make more impact

00:39:03.060 persuasion-wise

00:39:03.940 than the established media.

00:39:05.680 And the reason is credibility.

00:39:07.720 People just don't believe

00:39:09.320 established media anymore.

00:39:11.440 But do they believe

00:39:12.900 Tim Poole?

00:39:14.680 Pretty much.

00:39:16.500 Do they believe Joe Rogan?

00:39:18.500 Yep.

00:39:19.440 If they watched

00:39:20.180 James Altucher's stuff,

00:39:22.160 he doesn't do

00:39:23.060 the political stuff so much.

00:39:24.920 But do they believe him?

00:39:25.980 Yeah.

00:39:26.180 Yeah, totally credible.

00:39:27.860 How about Jordan Peterson?

00:39:30.220 If they watch him

00:39:31.100 do something.

00:39:33.560 Yeah, totally credible.

00:39:35.600 So the independent voices

00:39:37.440 are becoming

00:39:38.380 more and more credible.

00:39:40.700 Their platforms

00:39:41.340 are getting bigger and bigger.

00:39:42.820 And the established media

00:39:44.500 is going down.

00:39:45.540 Now, like I said,

00:39:46.340 Fox News is clearly

00:39:47.420 an exception.

00:39:49.480 Fox News is still

00:39:50.480 a powerhouse.

00:39:51.400 And I would argue

00:39:52.340 getting stronger.

00:39:53.840 I mean, now with

00:39:54.660 Gutfeld, you know,

00:39:56.540 managing to basically

00:39:58.420 dominate the, you know,

00:40:00.160 the evening hours as well,

00:40:02.460 they really have a pretty

00:40:03.920 good stranglehold

00:40:04.960 on the top spot there.

00:40:06.780 All right.

00:40:12.100 This is interesting.

00:40:13.160 You saw it with AM radio.

00:40:14.360 It started with a crutch

00:40:15.420 for the left,

00:40:16.740 but conservative shows

00:40:17.960 ended up dominating,

00:40:20.340 Anomalous says.

00:40:21.960 Interesting.

00:40:23.620 All right.

00:40:23.980 So,

00:40:25.720 have you noticed that

00:40:29.440 depending on what side

00:40:30.440 you're on,

00:40:31.040 you'll decide that

00:40:32.160 if there are a few

00:40:33.860 bad apples in the barrel,

00:40:36.100 that either the whole

00:40:37.240 barrel is bad

00:40:38.180 or it's not.

00:40:40.180 It just depends

00:40:40.800 what team you're on.

00:40:42.340 So, if you're on

00:40:42.940 team apple

00:40:43.600 and it's proven

00:40:45.080 that a few of your

00:40:45.880 apples are bad,

00:40:47.260 you're going to say,

00:40:48.140 well, it's just a few

00:40:49.000 apples.

00:40:50.000 The rest of us are great.

00:40:51.120 Don't judge us

00:40:51.780 by those few bad apples.

00:40:53.580 But,

00:40:54.040 if you're on the other

00:40:54.900 team,

00:40:55.760 you're going to say,

00:40:56.260 well,

00:40:57.000 look at the bad apples

00:40:57.940 in that bunch over there.

00:40:58.960 So, of course,

00:41:00.280 none of these arguments

00:41:01.240 about entire groups

00:41:03.160 being bad or good

00:41:04.720 are even a little

00:41:06.060 bit legitimate.

00:41:08.080 Right?

00:41:08.480 And I'm going to say

00:41:10.400 the same thing

00:41:11.060 about Black Lives Matter.

00:41:15.040 So,

00:41:15.660 the way that Black Lives 1.00

00:41:16.600 Matter was being

00:41:17.560 looked at by the right

00:41:19.500 is very similar

00:41:21.180 to how the January 6th

00:41:22.520 thing is being looked

00:41:23.440 at by the left.

00:41:25.640 Which is,

00:41:26.420 if you were to look at,

00:41:27.180 let's say,

00:41:27.540 the entire group

00:41:29.200 of Black Lives Matter

00:41:30.620 protesters,

00:41:32.200 what percentage

00:41:33.120 of the total protesters

00:41:35.140 were literally

00:41:35.900 doing a crime?

00:41:38.220 I actually don't know.

00:41:40.200 But it's not more

00:41:41.060 than 10%,

00:41:41.720 is it?

00:41:43.140 I don't think

00:41:43.900 it's more than 10%.

00:41:45.700 See,

00:41:46.660 those of you

00:41:47.120 who have the big,

00:41:47.840 I'm seeing some bigger

00:41:48.600 estimates on locals.

00:41:50.260 If you have a bigger

00:41:50.980 estimate,

00:41:51.500 like 25,

00:41:52.520 some people are guessing

00:41:53.420 that,

00:41:54.780 you think that 25%

00:41:56.360 of the Black Lives Matter

00:41:57.520 protesters were actually

00:41:59.060 committing actual crimes,

00:42:02.400 25%?

00:42:05.040 I don't think

00:42:05.920 it's even close to that.

00:42:07.580 I mean,

00:42:07.800 I don't know.

00:42:08.580 Has anybody ever measured it?

00:42:10.500 Well,

00:42:10.860 let's,

00:42:11.280 and then let's take

00:42:12.260 the same question

00:42:12.920 and apply it to the

00:42:13.920 January 6th.

00:42:15.180 What percentage,

00:42:16.820 what percentage

00:42:18.420 of them

00:42:19.000 on January 6th

00:42:20.420 do you think

00:42:20.840 were really wanting

00:42:22.620 to do an insurrection

00:42:23.640 and really actually

00:42:24.940 do some damage?

00:42:26.240 less than 1%

00:42:28.620 maybe?

00:42:32.400 Maybe.

00:42:35.340 Yeah,

00:42:35.980 so,

00:42:36.720 so at what point

00:42:38.320 we should have

00:42:39.040 some kind of a standard?

00:42:42.980 Yes,

00:42:43.460 I was on Joe Rogan.

00:42:45.040 Somebody asked me.

00:42:48.120 We should have

00:42:48.860 a standard

00:42:49.360 of how many

00:42:50.200 bad apples

00:42:50.960 there are

00:42:51.540 before the bunch

00:42:52.300 is bad.

00:42:52.780 and so I asked

00:42:54.780 and I was just

00:42:55.360 wondering how

00:42:55.960 people would feel

00:42:56.740 about that

00:42:57.060 so I asked

00:42:57.500 a poll question

00:42:59.240 and I said

00:42:59.960 what percentage

00:43:00.920 of a group

00:43:01.680 needs to be bad

00:43:02.980 in order for you

00:43:04.340 to judge the entire

00:43:05.240 group

00:43:05.640 by the few?

00:43:08.620 So,

00:43:09.720 1% of the

00:43:11.660 people said

00:43:13.880 that if 9%

00:43:14.860 of them

00:43:15.220 are bad

00:43:15.760 no,

00:43:17.740 I'm sorry,

00:43:19.220 9%

00:43:20.100 of the respondents

00:43:20.740 said if even

00:43:21.780 1%

00:43:22.340 of them

00:43:22.700 are bad

00:43:23.240 they're all

00:43:24.080 bad.

00:43:25.060 Does that seem

00:43:25.720 extreme to you?

00:43:27.480 So,

00:43:27.880 so 9%

00:43:28.740 of the people

00:43:29.140 answering said

00:43:29.740 if even

00:43:30.140 1%

00:43:30.740 are bad

00:43:31.200 you can

00:43:32.040 judge

00:43:32.340 the group.

00:43:34.020 12%

00:43:34.740 said

00:43:35.140 only 5%

00:43:36.040 is bad

00:43:36.360 you can

00:43:36.660 judge

00:43:36.880 the group.

00:43:38.300 27%

00:43:39.180 said

00:43:39.560 if 10%

00:43:40.260 of them

00:43:40.660 are bad

00:43:41.020 you can

00:43:41.340 judge

00:43:41.580 the group

00:43:41.980 and

00:43:43.060 over half

00:43:43.780 said

00:43:44.120 if 20%

00:43:44.880 are bad

00:43:45.200 you can

00:43:45.520 judge

00:43:45.760 the group.

00:43:46.720 So,

00:43:47.020 if more

00:43:47.740 than 20%

00:43:48.380 are bad

00:43:48.800 I,

00:43:49.840 you know,

00:43:51.240 I would say

00:43:51.740 you can

00:43:52.060 judge

00:43:52.320 the group.

00:43:53.680 At the lower

00:43:54.460 numbers

00:43:54.900 then it's

00:43:55.260 just more

00:43:55.620 of a

00:43:55.840 judgment.

00:43:56.820 More of a

00:43:57.420 judgment.

00:43:58.360 So,

00:43:58.880 it doesn't

00:43:59.320 look like

00:43:59.720 we could

00:44:00.060 even agree

00:44:00.740 on how

00:44:01.380 many bad

00:44:01.880 apples

00:44:02.180 it takes

00:44:02.580 to spoil

00:44:03.080 the whole

00:44:03.400 bunch.

00:44:05.160 So,

00:44:05.500 maybe we

00:44:05.860 can't have

00:44:06.180 any standard

00:44:06.680 for that.

00:44:07.400 But certainly

00:44:07.800 20%,

00:44:08.660 I would

00:44:11.480 say 1%

00:44:12.220 would be

00:44:12.620 a good

00:44:12.880 standard.

00:44:13.500 What do

00:44:13.680 you think?

00:44:16.940 What do

00:44:17.680 you think

00:44:18.120 if we

00:44:19.080 said

00:44:19.440 if

00:44:20.140 fewer

00:44:21.280 than 1%

00:44:22.080 are the

00:44:22.680 problem

00:44:23.060 then we

00:44:24.100 can say

00:44:24.600 the group

00:44:25.140 is fine?

00:44:26.500 Would you

00:44:27.040 agree with

00:44:27.340 that?

00:44:27.920 Do you

00:44:28.240 think that

00:44:28.640 more than

00:44:29.000 1%

00:44:29.620 of the

00:44:30.320 January 6

00:44:31.100 people

00:44:31.460 had

00:44:32.920 let's

00:44:33.640 say

00:44:33.780 violent

00:44:34.260 intentions?

00:44:36.820 I don't

00:44:37.380 know.

00:44:38.700 I mean

00:44:39.000 maybe if

00:44:39.500 the 1% 0.99

00:44:40.100 did

00:44:40.460 the others

00:44:41.320 got caught

00:44:41.840 up in

00:44:42.200 it,

00:44:42.400 that's

00:44:42.620 something

00:44:42.900 too.

00:44:48.160 Yeah,

00:44:48.640 there are

00:44:48.800 probably

00:44:48.980 more feds

00:44:49.900 than 1%,

00:44:50.620 somebody says.

00:44:53.640 So,

00:44:54.120 I just

00:44:54.340 put that

00:44:54.660 question out

00:44:55.200 there.

00:44:55.420 I think

00:44:55.640 we have

00:44:55.920 to deal

00:44:56.180 with this

00:44:56.500 because

00:44:56.700 otherwise

00:44:56.980 we end

00:44:57.480 up debating

00:44:58.780 absurdities

00:44:59.760 in public.

00:45:01.400 I think

00:45:01.800 it's

00:45:02.040 absurd to

00:45:02.840 say that

00:45:03.200 January 6

00:45:03.880 was an

00:45:04.260 insurrection

00:45:04.720 or not

00:45:05.300 an

00:45:05.480 insurrection.

00:45:06.720 It's

00:45:06.960 just

00:45:07.140 absurd.

00:45:08.360 What it

00:45:08.740 was is

00:45:09.280 a whole

00:45:09.540 bunch of

00:45:09.880 people who

00:45:10.300 were not

00:45:10.680 doing an

00:45:11.100 insurrection

00:45:11.620 with some

00:45:12.980 number that

00:45:13.460 we don't

00:45:13.780 know who

00:45:15.160 totally

00:45:15.580 probably wanted

00:45:16.260 an

00:45:16.440 insurrection.

00:45:18.180 So,

00:45:18.720 how can

00:45:18.960 you talk

00:45:19.300 about that

00:45:19.700 as one

00:45:20.100 event?

00:45:21.500 Wouldn't

00:45:21.900 it be more

00:45:22.380 accurate to

00:45:22.960 talk about it

00:45:23.480 as two

00:45:23.880 events that

00:45:24.440 happened at

00:45:24.860 the same

00:45:25.180 time?

00:45:26.240 One

00:45:26.660 event was a

00:45:27.300 whole bunch

00:45:27.600 of people

00:45:27.940 protesting who

00:45:28.880 genuinely

00:45:29.380 thought they

00:45:30.460 were fixing

00:45:31.100 the system,

00:45:32.520 meaning they

00:45:33.020 thought the

00:45:33.460 system had

00:45:33.920 given them a

00:45:34.500 bad result and

00:45:35.860 that the

00:45:36.180 system would

00:45:36.740 be stronger

00:45:37.420 and more

00:45:38.340 credible if

00:45:39.460 they just

00:45:39.760 took a

00:45:40.100 pause and

00:45:41.440 made sure

00:45:42.220 that they

00:45:42.800 got the

00:45:43.200 result that

00:45:43.720 they wanted

00:45:44.060 to get.

00:45:44.840 Well,

00:45:45.360 made sure

00:45:45.720 that they

00:45:46.000 had an

00:45:46.220 accurate

00:45:46.440 result.

00:45:48.520 Don't you

00:45:49.080 think?

00:45:49.520 Don't you

00:45:49.860 think at

00:45:50.140 least 90%

00:45:50.860 had only

00:45:51.560 that in

00:45:51.980 mind to

00:45:52.720 get the

00:45:53.000 right answer?

00:45:53.500 And then

00:45:55.000 10% or

00:45:56.160 maybe 1%

00:45:56.960 had much

00:45:58.320 worse ideas.

00:45:59.140 All right.

00:46:03.860 Chris Christie

00:46:04.800 said this

00:46:07.580 about January

00:46:08.220 6th, so

00:46:08.720 he's going

00:46:09.240 a little bit

00:46:09.660 hard, well

00:46:10.280 he's going

00:46:10.600 hard at

00:46:10.980 Trump.

00:46:11.660 He said

00:46:11.980 January 6th

00:46:12.940 was a

00:46:13.320 riot that

00:46:14.300 was incited

00:46:15.020 by Donald

00:46:15.660 Trump in

00:46:16.540 an effort to

00:46:17.100 intimidate

00:46:17.800 Mike Pence

00:46:18.900 and the

00:46:19.180 Congress into

00:46:19.800 doing exactly

00:46:20.640 what he said

00:46:21.340 in his own

00:46:21.980 words last

00:46:22.700 week, overturn

00:46:23.960 the election.

00:46:25.280 He wanted

00:46:26.000 the election

00:46:26.500 to be overturned,

00:46:27.860 meaning Trump

00:46:28.460 did.

00:46:29.140 Now, what

00:46:30.660 do you

00:46:30.860 think about

00:46:31.300 that?

00:46:31.880 Let's say

00:46:32.460 Christie was

00:46:33.100 right.

00:46:33.820 Let's say,

00:46:34.800 just hypothetically,

00:46:36.560 let's say his

00:46:37.220 characterization of

00:46:39.920 what Trump did

00:46:40.620 is exactly the

00:46:41.600 way he explained

00:46:42.220 it.

00:46:43.200 And I'm going

00:46:43.600 to read it

00:46:44.000 again, but I

00:46:44.880 want to ask

00:46:45.280 this question

00:46:45.760 first.

00:46:47.540 Why would

00:46:48.280 we assume

00:46:48.860 this is bad?

00:46:51.180 Okay?

00:46:51.660 Why would

00:46:52.100 you assume

00:46:52.520 it's bad?

00:46:52.980 I'll read it

00:46:53.300 again and

00:46:54.200 ask yourself,

00:46:54.820 why do you

00:46:55.120 assume that's

00:46:55.700 bad?

00:46:57.580 That Trump

00:46:58.460 Trump was

00:46:59.620 doing exactly

00:47:00.440 what Christie

00:47:02.520 said, inciting

00:47:03.820 a riot to

00:47:05.380 intimidate Mike

00:47:06.220 Pence and

00:47:06.600 the Congress

00:47:07.040 into overturning

00:47:09.000 the election.

00:47:10.000 Why is that

00:47:10.500 bad?

00:47:12.400 Why is it

00:47:12.920 bad?

00:47:16.800 All right,

00:47:17.340 I'm just

00:47:17.560 looking at

00:47:17.920 your answers.

00:47:18.740 all right,

00:47:22.740 here's why,

00:47:23.620 here's the

00:47:24.240 problem with

00:47:24.900 this statement.

00:47:25.840 There's a

00:47:26.480 gigantic

00:47:27.080 assumption here

00:47:28.240 that's unstated.

00:47:29.860 And if you

00:47:30.500 don't, if you

00:47:31.220 don't state the

00:47:32.140 gigantic

00:47:32.720 assumption, I

00:47:34.580 don't know what

00:47:34.940 to think about

00:47:35.440 it.

00:47:36.040 And the

00:47:36.580 gigantic

00:47:37.060 assumption was

00:47:38.260 about whether

00:47:38.840 the election

00:47:39.440 was valid

00:47:41.380 or not,

00:47:42.520 and whether

00:47:42.960 you could tell

00:47:43.500 just by looking

00:47:44.180 at it.

00:47:46.220 If the

00:47:46.920 election was

00:47:48.460 completely

00:47:48.920 valid, then

00:47:51.240 yeah, what

00:47:51.800 Chris Christie

00:47:52.580 is saying looks

00:47:53.360 pretty bad,

00:47:54.700 especially if

00:47:55.360 Trump knew it

00:47:55.880 was valid.

00:47:56.760 In that case,

00:47:57.560 it really is an

00:47:58.220 insurrection and

00:47:59.120 it's all bad.

00:48:00.600 But what if

00:48:01.320 Trump genuinely

00:48:03.080 believed that

00:48:04.780 something bad had

00:48:05.680 happened to the

00:48:06.200 republic, and

00:48:08.340 what if he

00:48:09.280 thought he was

00:48:09.800 fixing it?

00:48:11.460 What if he

00:48:12.140 thought he was

00:48:12.600 fixing a

00:48:13.380 problem, not

00:48:14.260 creating one?

00:48:16.100 Well, that's

00:48:16.660 different.

00:48:17.880 Now, he could

00:48:18.360 be wrong or he

00:48:19.120 could be right

00:48:19.680 about whether

00:48:20.220 there's a

00:48:20.620 problem and

00:48:21.020 whether he

00:48:21.360 could fix it

00:48:21.820 that way.

00:48:22.660 But you

00:48:23.200 would think

00:48:23.800 completely

00:48:24.240 different of

00:48:24.840 someone who

00:48:25.480 incited a

00:48:26.980 riot to

00:48:27.420 save the

00:48:27.880 republic,

00:48:29.020 because that's

00:48:31.520 not ruled

00:48:32.040 out.

00:48:32.980 We have not

00:48:33.560 ruled out the

00:48:34.480 possibility that

00:48:36.060 everybody involved

00:48:36.940 thought they

00:48:37.360 were saving

00:48:37.860 the republic.

00:48:38.380 You would

00:48:40.160 judge that a

00:48:40.720 little bit

00:48:41.000 differently, even

00:48:41.580 if they're

00:48:41.920 wrong, right?

00:48:43.080 Even if they're

00:48:43.640 wrong.

00:48:44.440 Because this is a

00:48:45.380 group that you

00:48:45.740 don't have to

00:48:46.120 worry about.

00:48:48.260 You don't have

00:48:48.900 to worry about

00:48:49.380 them.

00:48:49.700 You just have to

00:48:50.300 show them that

00:48:50.780 the election was

00:48:51.440 fair, and then

00:48:52.520 they're cool.

00:48:53.820 That's the

00:48:54.360 opposite of an

00:48:55.900 insurrection.

00:48:57.160 The opposite of

00:48:58.260 an insurrection is

00:48:59.120 just show me that

00:49:00.360 the election was

00:49:01.000 cool and we'll

00:49:01.640 stop.

00:49:02.640 Okay, here's the

00:49:03.400 audit.

00:49:04.220 The election was

00:49:05.100 cool.

00:49:06.160 And then we go, 1.00

00:49:06.840 oh, damn. 1.00

00:49:07.860 Okay. 0.99

00:49:09.360 That is the

00:49:10.220 opposite of an

00:49:10.900 insurrection.

00:49:11.640 You could not be

00:49:13.260 less insurrection-y

00:49:14.580 than just show us

00:49:16.040 it's real and we'll

00:49:16.700 go away. 0.82

00:49:18.460 That, you really

00:49:20.120 can't get more

00:49:20.800 peaceful than that.

00:49:22.340 I mean, that's the

00:49:23.680 wrong way to say it,

00:49:24.360 but you know what I

00:49:24.760 mean.

00:49:26.060 All right.

00:49:28.660 That was the

00:49:30.300 fascinating content

00:49:31.240 that I had for

00:49:31.900 today.

00:49:33.460 And how many of

00:49:35.580 the protesters were

00:49:36.500 cops?

00:49:37.160 Yeah, we'll never

00:49:37.700 know.

00:49:38.960 It was his duty to

00:49:40.460 protect the

00:49:41.200 republic.

00:49:41.820 That's right.

00:49:42.840 It's like we

00:49:43.480 ignore the fact that

00:49:44.640 Trump's sacred duty

00:49:45.880 was to protect the

00:49:47.540 republic.

00:49:48.580 Now, I'm not so

00:49:49.920 hypnotized that I

00:49:54.000 think Trump wasn't

00:49:54.880 mostly thinking about

00:49:55.940 his own interests.

00:49:56.720 But the whole point

00:49:59.300 of a president is

00:50:00.200 that you match the

00:50:00.960 country's interests

00:50:01.820 with the president's.

00:50:03.360 They should be the

00:50:04.080 same.

00:50:05.460 They should be.

00:50:07.020 So if the president

00:50:08.060 was acting in his own

00:50:09.140 best interest while

00:50:10.020 still in office,

00:50:12.460 should we be surprised

00:50:13.900 that that would match

00:50:14.800 the public's best

00:50:15.660 interest?

00:50:17.040 That shouldn't be a

00:50:18.040 surprise.

00:50:19.220 So we do allow

00:50:20.520 presidents to act

00:50:21.360 selfishly because the

00:50:23.080 system depends on it.

00:50:24.760 In other words, we want

00:50:25.880 a president to be acting

00:50:26.980 in a way that will get

00:50:27.880 him reelected or to get

00:50:30.180 him or her a legacy.

00:50:33.900 Right?

00:50:34.200 You want them to be

00:50:35.060 acting with self-interest.

00:50:36.140 That's how capitalism

00:50:36.960 works.

00:50:38.140 The whole system requires

00:50:39.640 unselfinterest.

00:50:40.660 So that's not a problem

00:50:41.620 that the president has

00:50:43.020 self-interest if it also

00:50:45.180 happened to be exactly

00:50:46.340 what was in the interest

00:50:47.200 of the country.

00:50:48.600 And if he believed that

00:50:50.020 it was fraudulent, and I

00:50:51.140 think he did.

00:50:52.340 Well, let me ask you

00:50:53.080 this.

00:50:54.220 How many of you think

00:50:55.460 that Trump believed it

00:50:58.120 was a fraudulent election?

00:50:59.200 Forget about the facts

00:51:01.240 for a moment.

00:51:02.420 So we're not talking

00:51:03.120 about facts.

00:51:04.340 How many of you think

00:51:05.160 he believed it was

00:51:06.280 fraudulent?

00:51:08.240 Yeah, I'm saying

00:51:08.920 almost all yeses.

00:51:11.340 Right?

00:51:13.400 And so, and I'd love to

00:51:15.980 see people on the left

00:51:17.280 answer that question.

00:51:19.460 Do the people on the

00:51:20.320 left believe that he

00:51:21.860 knew he lost and he was

00:51:23.920 trying to change the

00:51:24.740 result anyway?

00:51:26.940 Because that seems to

00:51:27.980 be the biggest difference

00:51:28.860 and assumption of how

00:51:29.720 you see this.

00:51:31.220 I don't know.

00:51:32.140 I would say that given

00:51:33.900 Trump's personality,

00:51:36.600 given everything that he

00:51:37.880 knew and thought going

00:51:39.460 into the election,

00:51:40.900 given the size of his

00:51:42.000 rally crowds, given the

00:51:44.140 fact that he's presumably

00:51:45.580 always surrounded by

00:51:46.600 supporters, so he would

00:51:48.300 get a very unrealistic

00:51:50.720 view of his own

00:51:51.860 popularity because he'd be

00:51:53.060 surrounded by sycophants

00:51:54.820 all the time.

00:51:55.280 So, and then allegedly

00:51:58.300 he's a narcissist, right?

00:52:00.320 So he would want to have

00:52:01.900 the best legacy and, you

00:52:03.560 know, it would be

00:52:04.060 important to him how he

00:52:05.720 looked and stuff.

00:52:07.080 But I think that he

00:52:09.420 honestly, we can't read

00:52:13.020 his mind, so we don't

00:52:13.740 know.

00:52:14.300 But I would say that

00:52:15.060 everything we know about

00:52:16.080 him suggests that he

00:52:17.020 thought it was really a

00:52:18.160 fraudulent election.

00:52:19.060 And if you don't know

00:52:20.900 the answer to that,

00:52:22.240 then you don't know how

00:52:23.320 to, you don't know how

00:52:24.980 to evaluate how he

00:52:26.160 acted.

00:52:27.420 Because the way he acted

00:52:28.520 was on whatever his

00:52:29.660 assumptions were, and we

00:52:30.560 don't know it.

00:52:31.880 We know he says he thinks

00:52:33.260 it was fraudulent, but,

00:52:36.980 you know, he's, he's, he's,

00:52:38.500 he has failed to fact

00:52:40.220 checking enough in the

00:52:42.180 past that just because he

00:52:44.300 says it, you know, even

00:52:46.060 I'm not going to believe

00:52:46.800 it just because he says

00:52:47.640 it, am I right?

00:52:50.020 Like, you, you wouldn't

00:52:50.840 criticize me for that,

00:52:51.900 would you?

00:52:53.060 That just because Trump

00:52:54.220 says something is true,

00:52:56.120 that doesn't make it

00:52:57.020 true, right?

00:52:58.480 No matter how much you

00:52:59.360 love the guy, or love

00:53:01.260 his policies, he has a

00:53:03.620 history of, well, let's

00:53:05.060 say hyperbole to be, to

00:53:06.640 be kind.

00:53:07.800 But in this specific

00:53:09.020 case, all evidence

00:53:10.580 suggests he actually

00:53:11.480 believed him, I think.

00:53:13.620 I've never heard one

00:53:14.680 person even on an

00:53:15.620 insider say, well, think

00:53:17.700 about this.

00:53:18.160 There's not one

00:53:19.400 insider who ever

00:53:20.500 reported that he

00:53:22.280 didn't genuinely

00:53:22.980 believe it.

00:53:24.820 Think about that.

00:53:26.380 Think about the

00:53:27.060 number of people who

00:53:27.720 have turned on him.

00:53:29.380 Yeah.

00:53:30.440 Yeah, you're just

00:53:31.400 coming around, right?

00:53:32.900 Because when you think

00:53:33.720 about that, think of the

00:53:34.920 number of people who

00:53:35.640 have absolutely just

00:53:36.620 turned on him in

00:53:37.960 public.

00:53:39.100 You don't think one of

00:53:40.540 those people would have

00:53:42.760 heard him say that he's

00:53:44.220 just trying to, you know,

00:53:46.080 take over the country or

00:53:47.240 something.

00:53:47.960 You don't think anybody

00:53:49.140 would have seen him say,

00:53:50.760 well, I don't know if it

00:53:51.700 was fraudulent, but let's

00:53:52.840 try to win anyway.

00:53:54.940 Somebody would have seen

00:53:56.580 something like that, or at

00:53:58.440 least seen it on the

00:53:59.200 staff.

00:54:00.160 There's not even one

00:54:01.160 report, correct me if I'm

00:54:03.280 wrong, I believe there is

00:54:05.140 not one report of anyone

00:54:07.240 saying that anyone on the

00:54:09.300 staff believed it was a

00:54:11.420 fair election and they

00:54:12.780 still wanted to overturn it.

00:54:13.980 Am I right?

00:54:15.960 That is one big dog that's

00:54:17.700 not barking.

00:54:18.920 Because there are leaks and

00:54:21.760 there are turncoats and

00:54:22.960 there are whistleblowers all

00:54:24.240 over this story.

00:54:26.120 There are probably more

00:54:27.000 whistleblowers on this story

00:54:28.480 than maybe anything ever

00:54:29.700 that we've ever seen.

00:54:32.560 And not one person has

00:54:33.980 suggested that the impulse to

00:54:37.040 pause the election and check

00:54:38.960 it was anything but sincere.

00:54:42.320 Think about it.

00:54:42.980 Not one person has even

00:54:45.160 alleged that.

00:54:46.620 Not one person has alleged

00:54:48.300 that it was an insincere

00:54:50.840 attempt.

00:54:52.940 Was it good for the

00:54:54.120 country?

00:54:54.460 That's a good argument.

00:54:56.120 Yeah.

00:54:56.700 If you're going to argue

00:54:57.560 whether it was good or bad

00:54:58.560 that it happened, it

00:55:01.440 doesn't look good.

00:55:02.640 It looks kind of bad to me.

00:55:04.800 But I don't think you can

00:55:06.660 argue that it was sincere.

00:55:08.960 There's no way that that

00:55:10.640 could have been still a

00:55:11.780 secret at this point.

00:55:12.820 A year later, a year later,

00:55:15.660 and you don't think Chris

00:55:16.640 Christie, just to pick one,

00:55:18.480 you don't think that he

00:55:19.480 would have known for sure,

00:55:22.220 for sure, that the people in

00:55:25.160 the White House believed their

00:55:26.400 own story or didn't.

00:55:28.480 He would know.

00:55:30.260 Am I right?

00:55:31.920 Chris Christie is well enough

00:55:33.740 attached.

00:55:34.300 And he's clearly speaking out

00:55:36.520 about the president, so he

00:55:38.300 doesn't have any...

00:55:39.560 He's not giving you a fear-based

00:55:42.780 opinion.

00:55:43.820 Would you agree with that?

00:55:46.220 That Christie's opinion doesn't

00:55:47.860 seem that Christie is afraid of

00:55:49.900 anything at this point.

00:55:51.720 It doesn't look like it.

00:55:53.300 So if he thought that they

00:55:54.660 actually were lying about their

00:55:56.820 belief about the election, he'd

00:55:58.000 tell you.

00:55:58.820 Don't you think?

00:55:59.600 Now, think about the fact that I'm

00:56:05.520 the first person who mentioned

00:56:06.660 this to you.

00:56:09.060 The dog not barking is the one

00:56:10.800 that people forget the most.

00:56:12.240 Well, that's the whole point of

00:56:13.620 it, right?

00:56:15.200 But the entire media coverage of

00:56:17.460 this for a year has never once

00:56:19.740 said, do you notice something

00:56:21.100 missing?

00:56:22.600 That not one person has suggested

00:56:24.880 the administration was insincere.

00:56:27.480 Not one.

00:56:29.140 Am I wrong?

00:56:30.040 Because I think by now one of

00:56:31.240 you would have said, oh, yeah,

00:56:32.220 there was this one person.

00:56:35.500 Oh, what was this?

00:56:36.500 Boop, boop, boop, boop, boop, 0.98

00:56:37.300 boop, boop, Scott.

00:56:38.780 So Jessica asks this.

00:56:40.880 Jessica's looking for the

00:56:41.920 Shelly treatment.

00:56:43.140 Let's see if she gets it.

00:56:45.540 Hold on, hold on. 1.00

00:56:46.700 Damn it. 1.00

00:56:47.160 Stop going by. 1.00

00:56:48.760 Why did you support lockdowns

00:56:50.500 that forced everyone to shop in a

00:56:51.980 few stores, open for less than...

00:56:54.840 Buh, buh, buh, buh, buh, buh.

00:56:55.580 Why did I support lockdowns?

00:56:58.040 Jessica?

00:57:00.060 What should we tell Jessica

00:57:01.540 about my support for lockdowns?

00:57:07.860 Does anybody want to do this for me?

00:57:10.260 Or would you like me to do it? 0.96

00:57:14.220 Jessica, you hallucinating piece of 1.00

00:57:17.880 shit. 1.00

00:57:18.220 That never happened. 1.00

00:57:19.020 I never supported lockdowns.

00:57:22.480 Not once.

00:57:23.460 Never came out of my voice.

00:57:24.980 Never wrote it.

00:57:25.760 Never tweeted it. 0.96

00:57:27.100 Not fucking once. 0.98

00:57:29.440 Not once. 0.98

00:57:31.420 So before you come over here

00:57:33.540 and spread libelous misinformation,

00:57:38.400 why don't you go check your sources,

00:57:41.300 check your thinking,

00:57:41.960 and come back

00:57:44.020 when you're 1.00

00:57:45.900 less useless. 0.99

00:57:48.020 Okay?

00:57:49.980 Was that good enough?

00:57:51.960 I know.

00:57:52.940 You were waiting for the C word, 0.99

00:57:54.420 weren't you?

00:57:55.680 But unlike

00:57:56.600 some of you,

00:57:57.940 I treat men and women the same,

00:57:59.860 with equal dignity.

00:58:01.800 I do.

00:58:03.360 And if a man attacks me,

00:58:05.040 I would use any word

00:58:06.300 I wanted

00:58:06.880 to insult that man.

00:58:08.900 If a woman attacks me,

00:58:10.400 and again,

00:58:11.720 if, you know,

00:58:12.560 if I get attacked first,

00:58:14.360 there's no word

00:58:15.300 I'm not going to use,

00:58:16.780 publicly or privately,

00:58:18.560 if I feel like it.

00:58:20.400 Now,

00:58:20.840 I didn't feel like

00:58:21.600 using the C word

00:58:22.900 with Jessica.

00:58:24.540 She sounded like

00:58:25.240 she was just misinformed.

00:58:27.280 Shelley

00:58:27.540 was a different subject.

00:58:30.320 The Shelley critic

00:58:31.920 that

00:58:32.540 I went off on here,

00:58:35.220 that was a more

00:58:36.040 evil

00:58:36.480 thing.

00:58:38.080 Jessica

00:58:38.400 had an actual question

00:58:39.760 based on

00:58:40.320 a misunderstanding.

00:58:42.480 That's fair.

00:58:43.540 So I didn't go

00:58:44.180 as hard as it.

00:58:45.960 But I'm not going to

00:58:47.100 hold back

00:58:48.060 because

00:58:48.940 somebody's gender.

00:58:52.220 Should I?

00:58:53.760 How many of you

00:58:54.860 are such 0.85

00:58:55.400 backward 0.99

00:58:56.700 misogynists

00:58:59.420 that you think

00:58:59.940 I should treat 0.99

00:59:00.600 a female troll 0.99

00:59:01.720 differently than a male troll 0.91

00:59:03.020 in public?

00:59:04.480 Does anybody think

00:59:05.260 I should treat them differently?

00:59:06.240 If they attack

00:59:09.500 me first,

00:59:11.240 right?

00:59:12.080 Well,

00:59:12.560 I guess I shouldn't

00:59:13.200 make a difference.

00:59:15.140 Yeah,

00:59:15.460 no.

00:59:16.240 There's no reason

00:59:16.940 I should

00:59:17.280 treat them differently.

00:59:22.800 Scott,

00:59:23.340 will you

00:59:23.660 apologize to...

00:59:25.840 Now,

00:59:26.180 Jessica

00:59:26.520 is going

00:59:27.640 all caps.

00:59:30.720 Apologize to...

00:59:31.800 except I couldn't

00:59:32.380 read it.

00:59:33.380 Well,

00:59:33.500 I apologized to what?

00:59:34.460 And it went away.

00:59:35.020 Apologize.

00:59:39.900 How long

00:59:40.400 are you going

00:59:40.720 to blabber

00:59:41.440 about this?

00:59:42.760 Okay,

00:59:43.360 Jessica's being 1.00

00:59:44.000 a cunt now. 1.00

00:59:45.080 Okay, 1.00

00:59:45.360 Jessica,

00:59:45.820 I was wrong.

00:59:46.520 You are just 1.00

00:59:47.120 a fucking 1.00

00:59:47.540 miserable 1.00

00:59:48.040 piece of shit 1.00

00:59:48.860 cunt. 1.00

00:59:49.780 So I'm going 1.00

00:59:50.160 to get rid 0.99

00:59:50.660 of you. 0.80

00:59:51.880 I thought...

00:59:52.400 Oh,

00:59:55.460 man,

00:59:55.680 I just hit

00:59:56.060 the wrong...

00:59:56.660 I just hit

00:59:58.440 the wrong

00:59:58.740 button there.

01:00:01.920 All right.

01:00:03.240 I'm going

01:00:03.720 to sign off

01:00:04.220 now.

01:00:04.520 And we'll

01:00:05.480 talk to you

01:00:06.040 tomorrow.

01:00:06.840 All right.

01:00:06.900 All right.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 08, 2022

Episode 1648 Scott Adams： Governments Are Failing and the Public is Taking Over Everywhere

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript