Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 22, 2022


Episode 1662 Scott Adams: Best Ukraine Analysis You'll Hear From Someone Who Doesn't Know Anything


Episode Stats

Length

57 minutes

Words per Minute

142.2736

Word Count

8,127

Sentence Count

533

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

Join me for the greatest thing that ever happened in this universe, the simultaneous sip, where we talk about Ukraine and the Pope's opinion on the possibility of war in Ukraine, and then we do a little update on the end of the masking era.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning everybody and welcome to the best thing that ever happened in this universe
00:00:17.760 and, dare I say, the afterlife.
00:00:21.460 I don't usually talk about the afterlife, but today have you noticed that there's something
00:00:27.700 missing in the news about Ukraine? I'll tell you about that, and then we'll do this simultaneous
00:00:34.660 sip, the holiest that there's ever been. Yes, I've noticed that a lot of people have been
00:00:40.800 talking about Ukraine and Russia and the possibility of war, but we have not heard from
00:00:45.860 the Pope. Now, the Pope was not available, but I know how he thinks, and so I thought I would
00:00:53.600 give you the official Pope opinion on the possibility of war in Ukraine. Give me a moment.
00:01:03.880 Let me concentrate. I want to receive the signal clearly. Religious signal coming in. Got it.
00:01:14.720 The Pope would have you know that he is opposed to war, and I think you're glad you waited for that.
00:01:22.060 So when it comes to the Pope, no war. He doesn't like it one bit, not one bit. And that, ladies and
00:01:32.340 gentlemen, is the religious opinion on the war. And I don't think that has been given enough attention,
00:01:40.340 so I thought I'd help. Do I look better with the hat? Is it my imagination, or did I get uglier
00:01:48.360 when I took the hat off? Is it just me? I think that actually happened. Yes. I think we found
00:01:59.980 something we could all agree on. I look better with the hat. I think I look better with the hat
00:02:06.160 and the mask, because a lot of the pandemic, my ugliness was completely covered. So I'd have
00:02:13.360 sunglasses on, and then I'd have a mask, and then I'd wear a baseball hat. So basically,
00:02:19.880 basically the only parts of my entire body that were showing on the colder days were my hands,
00:02:26.940 unless I had gloves on, were my hands and this little strip of skin right here, which by the way,
00:02:33.380 looks pretty good on me. Best part of my body, and this was just pure luck, pure luck. The best part of
00:02:41.960 my entire body is this narrow strip just above where my mask line would be and below my sunglasses.
00:02:49.040 I don't like to brag, but honestly, I've got one of the best over-mask, under-sunglasses
00:02:57.360 area of a body I've ever seen. I do work on it. Moisturizer, stay out of the sun. A lot of people
00:03:07.040 don't put the work in, but I do. How would you like the simultaneous sip? And all you need is a
00:03:11.860 cup or a mug or a glass of tank or a chalice or a canteen, a jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind.
00:03:16.800 Fill it with your favorite beverage. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure that
00:03:24.340 doped me into the day, the thing that makes absolutely everything better. It's called,
00:03:30.180 what, what, what is it called? That's right. The simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.
00:03:39.660 Oh.
00:03:43.680 I don't know. Something happened. Hold on a second.
00:03:48.500 I hate it when this happens. I accidentally turned my coffee into wine.
00:04:02.840 That, you think you've got things under control? Okay, I stole that joke from somebody on the
00:04:09.820 locals platform. I saw your comments on locals, and I did steal your joke, but they didn't see it.
00:04:15.180 They didn't see it. They didn't see it on YouTube. So for a moment there, they thought I had a pretty
00:04:20.680 good, pretty good joke until I had to admit it wasn't mine. Well, let's do a little update on
00:04:30.240 freedom. I was out and about yesterday and day before looking at how many people have taken off
00:04:38.860 their masks now that the California mandate has been dropped. So if you're in a store or shopping
00:04:45.580 or whatever, you do not require a mask. Where I live, about 80% of people are still masked.
00:04:54.580 That's right. My state was offered its freedom, and 80% of the residents said, well, thank you,
00:05:01.680 but no thank you. I would rather stay in my little mask cage, including outdoors. Now, I'm not positive
00:05:10.200 this is true, but I think the outdoor masking is at an all-time high. This is after the mask mandate
00:05:18.720 has completely eliminated outdoor masking. I've never seen higher outdoor masking than right now.
00:05:25.000 Now, I had actually talked to some people, who shall remain anonymous, who actually said they
00:05:32.800 kind of liked the mask era for a variety of reasons. They liked them. There are people who
00:05:40.560 like the masks. Apparently, you can get used to anything. I wasn't one of them. So I didn't see
00:05:47.200 that coming. And I did a little tweet today to ask what mandates are still in effect in the United
00:05:53.560 States. So here are the ones I know about. We'll see if these get mopped up. I hope they do.
00:05:59.940 So the remaining mandates are, let's see, New York City, you still need vaccination passports to go
00:06:04.840 in a restaurant. That's still true, right? Give me a fact check as I go and add some ones if you
00:06:10.560 know. I believe healthcare workers, including everybody, the janitors, the receptionists, everybody
00:06:16.480 in healthcare, are still under mandatory vaccinations. That's true, right? Still need masks on public
00:06:25.600 transport and for flying in particular. I guess just public transport. Still need masks in some places,
00:06:33.600 like students are doing it in a lot of schools, Washington State, Massachusetts, California, Hawaii,
00:06:41.200 still got some masks. Federal buildings masks and cruise ships, which I guess is a form of public
00:06:49.640 transport. So those are the, what ones did I miss? Has the passport, where else is the vaccine passport
00:07:00.940 in effect? Flying? So here, so here's a sort of a checkpoint. Does it look like if you were just to
00:07:15.000 judge the pandemic in terms of freedoms given up compared to other countries, just freedoms given up,
00:07:22.800 are we doing okay? I mean, is the United States, are we doing well enough to claw back our freedoms?
00:07:31.780 Because we have some, you know, in Canada, I know some of the provinces gave up on some of their
00:07:37.340 mandates, but we're not really, we're not close to the end point. And we're not close. But I do think
00:07:45.520 we're going to get away without vaccine passports. What do you think? Do you think at this point,
00:07:52.080 what is your current prediction about USA and vaccine passports? I feel like we're going to not
00:08:00.900 have them. Am I wrong? Because if we don't have them yet, it feels like this wouldn't be the time
00:08:08.760 to implement them. I don't think public would, would accept it now. Yeah. So I would say I'm going to
00:08:16.700 give, I'm going to give America a C plus in regaining freedoms. Would you agree? I'll give us
00:08:26.040 a C plus. Like lots of work to do. But it's not as bad as it could have been. I mean, it could have
00:08:33.220 been worse, I suppose. But we're not close. We got to keep clawing. Have you noticed that the entire
00:08:39.760 retail part of at least America, I don't know if this is happening anywhere else, has turned to
00:08:46.160 garbage? As I tweeted yesterday, I went into six retail establishments and walked down of each one
00:08:53.180 because buying something was too hard. Here's what happened. And I don't know if anybody has noticed
00:09:01.360 this trend yet. If you make it possible to buy almost everything online, who is remaining to
00:09:10.140 stand in line at an actual retail store? Now in the short run, it's everybody, right? In the short run,
00:09:17.220 you buy some stuff online, but sometimes you go to stores. Over time, more and more people will move
00:09:23.080 to online only. And then the pandemic hits and more and more online there. So who's left? Well, let me tell
00:09:30.860 who's left. It's all the people who have a frickin problem. Right? You know how bad it is to get behind
00:09:38.760 the elderly person who's writing a check at the grocery store? Like you don't want to be in that
00:09:44.700 line? Now imagine that because all of the efficient people have already moved completely online,
00:09:52.600 the people in line are only the people writing a check in the grocery store and people like that.
00:09:59.860 Now, add to the fact that the only people in line are the people with problems.
00:10:06.440 On top of that, on top of that, the stores are asking for more stuff. Now they want your phone
00:10:14.460 number. They've got to find out if you've got a coupon. Is the coupon good? Are you part of the
00:10:20.260 loyalty program? If you don't have your card, can you plug it in? Do you want to donate something?
00:10:25.760 Yeah, you have four ways to pay and sometimes ID, sometimes not. So I stood in line and nobody could
00:10:38.140 get helped because everybody who was in line had like a story. Not only did the person in line have
00:10:45.860 a story, but then the retail worker had their own story, like data they had to collect and explaining
00:10:52.200 why they're doing things. And I thought to myself, I don't think I'll ever go to a retail
00:10:57.000 establishment again. Because what, whatever good or bad they used to be, they've just turned to
00:11:03.280 garbage. You can never buy your size. Am I right? Go into a store and find your size in anything,
00:11:11.160 basically. You can't. How many of you have stood in line long enough that you took out your phone,
00:11:19.640 you scanned the barcode on the thing in your hand, and you ordered it from Amazon, and then you got
00:11:25.180 it in line and put it back on the shelf? How many have done that? I'm not the only one. I saw somebody
00:11:33.680 commented on Twitter. Yeah, a lot of you. Because the process of in-store has gotten worse and worse
00:11:41.620 as they make you do more work just to pay, buy something. I don't know. I think retail is in
00:11:47.440 big trouble, even more than, you know, we obviously have known for a long time. Here's a little tip for
00:11:52.980 you if you're trying to figure out what trade to get into. Lisa de Pascal, who was commenting on my
00:12:01.280 comment about retail, and she said, it's awful in this economy. Why am I spending so much time
00:12:07.560 begging to pay people? Have you had this experience? You call somebody for some kind of a service,
00:12:15.180 just something that needs to be repaired or serviced or something. You can't get anybody to show up.
00:12:21.920 People will say, well, maybe in two weeks. Yeah, right? So if you are going to pick a field to enter,
00:12:30.740 find out who you can't hire now. If you can't get, I'll give you one example. All right. I'm going to
00:12:41.020 give you a trade tip. That's a pretty good one. You ready for this? Fireplace repair person.
00:12:50.640 Because a lot of fireplaces are gas operated. Fireplace repair person. It looks like the easiest
00:12:57.480 job in the world, because there are only like three elements to the whole thing. And, you know,
00:13:05.280 not too many manufacturers. So try to book one. You think you can get one same day? Nope. Nope. You can't.
00:13:15.480 So if you wanted to enter a trade, find out who can't show up and take your money. Because there are
00:13:22.160 people begging to give people money, and they can't find anybody to take it. We have a whole country,
00:13:27.480 people who have more money than they have services that they can buy. They want to buy stuff. They
00:13:32.840 can't find anybody to do it. So that's the thing. We'll talk about it in Ukraine, of course.
00:13:41.540 Turns out that cow manure is now economical as a major energy source. So dairy farmers are being
00:13:49.160 approached by energy companies that turn manure into methane, I guess, and then into energy.
00:13:55.400 And they figured out the economics to the point where I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think
00:14:01.480 the cow shit might be more worth more than the milk. I don't know that that's true. But are we going to
00:14:09.640 get to a point where cow shit is more valuable than the milk that comes out of the same cow?
00:14:14.440 And if we're turning cow shit into electricity, doesn't that mean that we're turning basically
00:14:23.720 everything green into electricity? We're basically, we're going to have to mow down forests and the
00:14:29.960 cows are going to be trampling all over the grass eating it and turning that into electricity.
00:14:34.120 Is that really efficient? I feel like, I feel like there might be a better way to
00:14:39.720 get your electricity. But anyway, that's a, that's the thing that's happening. We reached
00:14:45.000 the crossover point for profitability. And of course, you ask yourself, why do you need cows?
00:14:51.160 We've got seven people, seven billion people pooping all over the place. How many cows are there?
00:14:55.640 Are there more than seven billion cows? Why don't you capture some people poop? All right.
00:15:04.120 Here's a, here's a reason why nobody can be a good or bad predictor.
00:15:10.360 And this is the weirdest thing, but maybe this was always the case, but it seems especially the case
00:15:16.280 now that we'll never agree what is going to happen. I think you'd agree with that easily. We never
00:15:23.400 agree what's going to happen. Like when we predict, people will predict all over the place.
00:15:29.000 But the weirdest part that might be new, but I guess you'd have to ask a historian,
00:15:35.160 we can no longer agree on what did happen. That feels like it's new. So if you're in the business
00:15:41.320 of predicting things, as I sort of am, you can't even know if you were right. Because I can think I
00:15:48.520 was right. And other people will say, well, look at the facts, you were clearly wrong.
00:15:52.360 So you can't even know if you can predict right. Because there will be no agreement on what is.
00:15:57.080 Here's a perfect example. I predicted that Russia would not invade Ukraine.
00:16:03.960 Did they?
00:16:07.320 I don't know. Because it turns out that they did move troops into an area where they already had troops.
00:16:14.440 And already controlled the two separatist regions that were already under complete Russian control,
00:16:20.440 apparently. So if they moved troops into a place they already had troops,
00:16:27.560 into a region that was really not under control of Ukraine anyway, it was already Russian,
00:16:32.600 did they invade? So was my prediction already wrong? So I asked a poll, because I had no idea how people
00:16:41.880 would see this. 50% of the people who answered my Twitter poll, which is, of course, not scientific.
00:16:50.200 Half of them said it's not quite an invasion.
00:16:54.520 Not quite an invasion. But 37% said yes. So 37% of the people in my Twitter poll,
00:17:02.600 and these reasons people would be largely friendly to my point of view, think I'm wrong. And that my
00:17:10.040 prediction has already been proven wrong. But 50% of the people said I'm right. So how do I even know
00:17:18.280 if I'm a good predictor? I don't think you could just take the majority in this case. I mean, you can
00:17:23.800 see that it's so clear that people don't even agree on literal reality at this point. Because you can just
00:17:29.800 word think it away. Oh, it's part of Ukraine. Oh, it's not. And you both have a good argument.
00:17:34.840 But yesterday, Zelensky himself said, quote, with today's and possibly tomorrow's decisions, Russia is legalizing
00:17:46.200 its troops, which have actually been in the occupied territories of Donbass since 2014.
00:17:53.960 It seems to me that the president of Ukraine does not believe that Ukraine has been invaded. I mean, at least not
00:18:00.920 this week, already invaded, I guess. So if the president of Ukraine thinks I'm right so far,
00:18:07.880 so far, it's not looking like I'm going to be right. It does look like Putin's, you know, poised to do
00:18:15.400 more. But at the moment, am I right or am I wrong? In the comments, you tell me. At the moment, has
00:18:23.240 Ukraine been invaded already this week? I'll just read down some of the answers. Yes,
00:18:30.600 no, wrong. Yeah, it's early in the week, right? Nope, nope, nope. Okay, so we are mixed on that.
00:18:42.040 All right, let's talk about what's happening. I had some curiosity about whether Russian citizens know
00:18:48.040 what's going on in Ukraine. Now, of course, their state run media is all propaganda. So the state run
00:18:55.560 media is all misleading if you live in Russia. Would you agree with that? The state run media is
00:19:01.080 completely misleading to the Russian public. But don't they have internet access? I actually,
00:19:09.800 I wasn't sure until I actually did some Googling to find out what's going on. And Russia, of course,
00:19:17.880 is doing a variety of things to try to suppress access to information that would be bad for them.
00:19:24.200 But they do things like throttling certain content.
00:19:28.680 There is, they're not, the internet is still available, right? If you live in Russia,
00:19:35.880 can't you call up CNN webpage in America? There's nothing blocking that, right?
00:19:41.240 Can you give me a fact check on that? Oh, okay, so I'm seeing on locals the very next thing I was going
00:19:48.920 to talk about. Is the fact that Russians, by and large, don't speak English the only reason that
00:19:57.000 they don't know what's going on? Because everything that's in Russian presumably would be pro-Putin.
00:20:03.320 And do we have a problem that if the public in Russia had a better understanding of what was
00:20:10.200 happening, that they would not support their own president? I don't know. Maybe they would anyway.
00:20:17.560 So here's a question. Have you seen anywhere in the news if the Russian public supports Putin so far
00:20:24.760 in everything he's done? How many of you could answer the question, does the Russian public,
00:20:30.440 by a majority, support what Putin is doing right now?
00:20:37.560 Because I've got a feeling they might, right? It seems like probably. Partly because, you know,
00:20:44.920 Putin can control information to some extent. But also maybe because they like it. You can't rule out
00:20:53.320 the fact that they might just like a strong leader.
00:20:59.080 He's made a reasonable argument that these, you know, Russian-speaking people should be part of
00:21:03.880 the historic republic. And maybe the public likes it. Maybe. If it doesn't cost too much.
00:21:11.160 So Putin also revealed that he asked President Clinton years ago if he could join NATO.
00:21:24.840 That's not the first time we've heard that, right? It's the first time for me. I didn't know it.
00:21:29.080 But apparently there was some... Was there any knowledge about that before?
00:21:34.920 I think there might have been. But it wasn't widely known, right?
00:21:38.440 And so, for years now, I've been saying that Russia and the United States are natural allies.
00:21:50.440 And that the only reason we would be at each other's throats is psychological.
00:21:56.280 Like there's not a material reason that we would be enemies. There's just a psychological,
00:22:02.600 maybe historical reasons or whatever. So... Or political.
00:22:07.000 And I wonder, what would have happened if Russia had been considered for NATO?
00:22:15.800 Because I thought the whole point of NATO was to deter Russia, or the Soviet Union originally.
00:22:22.040 Am I wrong that the point of NATO was mostly about Russia? And what happens if Russia has to join the alliance against Russia?
00:22:33.960 Now, I get that they would do more than that. They would protect more than Russia. But...
00:22:39.880 I don't know. Is NATO active in anything that would involve China?
00:22:46.760 So, I'm a little bit confused about what is the point of NATO if the enemy of NATO asked if he could join NATO.
00:22:58.200 And it also makes me wonder if that was just an incredible master persuader move that didn't work out.
00:23:05.720 But it should have confused the United States, right?
00:23:10.200 If the person that you're trying to protect against asked you to join the organization of people protecting against him,
00:23:16.520 what the hell do you think?
00:23:17.480 I mean, how do you process that?
00:23:21.080 The way you should process it is that NATO doesn't make sense.
00:23:25.560 And if that's what Putin was doing, it was brilliant.
00:23:29.800 I mean, it didn't... Obviously, it didn't end NATO.
00:23:32.840 But it would have been a brilliant play to confuse people about why NATO even exists,
00:23:37.720 and put some doubt in everybody's mind about how much to fund it.
00:23:41.560 It could have been an incredibly genius move that was always meant to never be successful.
00:23:47.080 But just put that down.
00:23:48.120 In a way, it's very similar to what Trump did with Kim in North Korea.
00:23:54.760 Because what Trump did was simply act like he was his personal friend, which just ruins the whole frame.
00:24:05.160 Everything historically that made sense instantly didn't make sense.
00:24:09.240 Because Trump just changed the frame of reference to that we're two buddies.
00:24:13.720 And by the way, can I help you with your economy?
00:24:16.520 Why would you give me trouble? We're buddies.
00:24:20.120 Why would you point a nuclear weapon to me?
00:24:23.080 Why would my buddy do that?
00:24:25.240 I mean, I think the way Trump handled North Korea is one of the all-time great things that anybody ever did politically.
00:24:32.440 Honestly, I think it would go down in just one of the great moves of all time.
00:24:38.360 It might not last if somebody else causes trouble with North Korea.
00:24:41.800 But it was great at the time.
00:24:43.400 And I think that Putin played a similar frame-breaking play.
00:24:49.880 Maybe not as successfully.
00:24:52.200 He just broke the frame that it's an enemy and an army against the enemy.
00:24:57.080 Hey, can I join the army?
00:24:58.200 It's kind of brilliant.
00:25:01.400 But I do think it supports my idea that we're natural allies.
00:25:05.720 Because if he could even keep a straight face while saying, can you put us in NATO?
00:25:10.840 And he probably did.
00:25:12.840 If you could say that with a straight face, it probably means that you have an argument that we don't really need to be enemies.
00:25:21.240 There's just nothing to be gained from it.
00:25:24.600 All right.
00:25:28.200 One of the worst things about war and the threat of war is that the leaders on both sides can become more popular with war.
00:25:39.320 Isn't that the worst thing ever?
00:25:42.200 You want your leaders to know that if they ever went to war for anything, they would become less popular.
00:25:47.980 But they don't.
00:25:49.980 You know, we have an automatic nationalist instinct in this country and every other country that as soon as something looks like war, the leader's approval goes up.
00:26:00.940 It's almost automatic.
00:26:02.940 And so Biden, being in the basement of presidential approval, according to Rasmussen, it looks like he's getting a pop.
00:26:12.880 Biden's approval is going up.
00:26:14.960 Do you think he's earned it?
00:26:16.020 So far, just because obviously this is based on Ukraine.
00:26:22.240 Do you think he's earned it just on Ukraine?
00:26:24.820 So forget about everything else.
00:26:26.260 Just for a moment.
00:26:27.640 Because these polls tend to move with current events.
00:26:31.640 I'm seeing almost all no's.
00:26:34.880 Okay.
00:26:35.440 I see one yes.
00:26:38.480 I'm seeing hell no's.
00:26:39.840 Okay.
00:26:40.340 You seem to be quite unified on no.
00:26:44.340 Are you surprised that his approval is ticking up?
00:26:50.460 With this many no's, you should think, well, how can his approval be going up?
00:26:55.080 All right.
00:26:55.380 Let me give you an argument for Biden.
00:26:57.740 This is going to piss you off.
00:27:02.020 Right.
00:27:02.860 Now, keep in mind, we don't know what happens tomorrow.
00:27:05.420 So I'm only going to talk about what's happened so far.
00:27:09.720 Here's what's happened so far.
00:27:11.640 Russia has lost the Nord Stream 2 because by moving troops into the two occupied territories, the separatist territories, that triggered Germany to say, okay, Nord Stream 2 is done.
00:27:27.860 So that's a big economic hit.
00:27:29.400 A number of other sanctions will probably kick in, but not the worst of them, right?
00:27:34.540 So the minor sanctions might kick in, hurt a little bit around the edges.
00:27:39.620 So, so far, Russia has spent a bunch of money.
00:27:43.580 It has degraded its international reputation.
00:27:47.140 It lost Nord Stream.
00:27:50.580 And if it attacks, it's going to get, you know, extra pain.
00:27:56.960 And what is, and what has Russia gained so far?
00:28:00.900 What did it gain?
00:28:02.320 So far, all it gained was the property it already owned, which was the separatist regions.
00:28:08.740 So, so far, so far, Russia broke, broke even on land and is taking a hit, pretty big hit to its GDP.
00:28:21.420 Biden has so far gone cheap.
00:28:23.920 So, Biden, so far, hasn't committed, you know, large funds to military.
00:28:30.700 And he got a huge degradation of an opposing country.
00:28:37.960 So far, Biden is winning.
00:28:43.860 Now, I don't think that's, I'm not predicting that will last, okay?
00:28:48.040 So, I'm not, I'm not saying that when we're all said and done, I'm going to say, hey, Biden, you handled that just right.
00:28:54.520 That seems unlikely.
00:28:57.060 But, didn't that piss you off a little bit?
00:29:01.840 It did, didn't it?
00:29:04.460 Because you're, almost every one of you said he's, he's doing everything wrong.
00:29:09.360 But, so far, he's ahead on score.
00:29:13.340 Am I wrong about that?
00:29:15.720 Am I wrong that, so far, he's ahead in points?
00:29:19.220 Doesn't mean he wins the game at all.
00:29:21.660 But, so far?
00:29:23.080 Give me the argument in a short comment, can you?
00:29:26.620 I get that some of you are disagreeing.
00:29:30.520 I see the disagreement.
00:29:31.760 But, can you give me the reason?
00:29:34.080 He created it by being weak.
00:29:37.620 World stage loser.
00:29:39.240 It's only the fourth inning, that's true.
00:29:42.000 No, because it's BS.
00:29:44.940 You take his flaw, and he's weak, and the world will pay.
00:29:47.820 So, is it his weakness?
00:29:50.200 His weakness, right?
00:29:51.900 But, does he look weak?
00:29:53.120 Because he did unify NATO.
00:29:54.480 So, if he unified NATO, killed Nord Stream 2, hurt Russia's economy, hurt their standing
00:30:01.920 in the world, he didn't come out ahead, so far?
00:30:08.040 Now, our stock market will go down as well.
00:30:10.720 I think Russia went down $40 billion yesterday, or this week.
00:30:15.860 He failed to deter him, but that also only matters if he keeps going, because he's only
00:30:22.240 been undeterred to take what he already owned.
00:30:26.460 Somebody says he didn't unify NATO.
00:30:28.720 All right, so here's another perfect example of what I was just saying.
00:30:33.400 I was just saying that not only do people predict what will happen differently, but once
00:30:39.440 something has happened, we don't even agree what happened.
00:30:42.520 Isn't this another perfect example?
00:30:47.000 And by the way, I'm not going to disagree with you on this.
00:30:50.320 I made my best argument for an argument that would say Biden has done a reasonably good job
00:30:57.360 so far.
00:30:58.780 That was my best argument for it.
00:31:00.860 I don't disagree with your argument that he's blowing it.
00:31:05.380 I feel like it's a little premature, because as somebody said, this is the fourth inning.
00:31:11.240 You've got to kind of wait to the end to see who won, right?
00:31:14.360 So I'm going to wait to the end to see who won, but unlike some of you, I'm way closer
00:31:20.880 to wait and see than something terrible has happened already.
00:31:26.680 What happens?
00:31:27.400 So here's what I think is one strong possibility.
00:31:33.360 Do you think that Putin could claim victory if all he did was consolidate control over the
00:31:39.360 two separatist regions?
00:31:41.380 Would that be enough for him to say, yay, I won, got everything I want, I liberated these
00:31:47.960 two separatist regions?
00:31:50.500 I'm a liberator.
00:31:52.900 Can he go home?
00:31:54.540 Can he go home with a win?
00:31:57.400 Maybe.
00:32:01.420 You know, maybe he even makes money if the price of fuel goes up, that whatever he can
00:32:06.920 deliver without Nord Stream 2, doesn't he sell it for a higher price if energy prices
00:32:11.860 went up?
00:32:12.960 Maybe they won't stay up if he leaves.
00:32:15.720 But have we not created a situation in which by Biden and Zelensky, you could say cleverly,
00:32:23.860 but other people would say weakly, as in being weak.
00:32:28.420 Is it weak or is it clever that Biden and Zelensky have allowed that whatever Putin does with the
00:32:35.140 two separatist regions doesn't seem to count as an invasion?
00:32:38.260 Is it weak or is it weak or clever?
00:32:41.000 Because one possibility is that it allows Putin an easy escape hatch.
00:32:47.000 He can claim victory in a fairly credible way.
00:32:50.780 He could claim victory.
00:32:51.680 And then he'd have a way to back down and still look like the strong leader and still have a gain
00:32:58.480 within.
00:32:59.880 And I suppose he could still keep pushing on the rest of Ukraine.
00:33:03.580 And then would Biden look like he's a winner?
00:33:06.960 Because he didn't really give them anything they didn't already have.
00:33:09.760 And they lost the Nord Stream 2.
00:33:13.300 I don't know.
00:33:13.760 I think there's a situation now where both can be winners.
00:33:19.240 And maybe Zelensky too.
00:33:21.780 You know, Zelensky is still saying that he doesn't think there'll be an invasion of Ukraine proper.
00:33:27.780 I guess I shouldn't say proper.
00:33:29.620 He doesn't think there'll be an invasion of whatever's left of Ukraine.
00:33:36.920 And do you think he's lying about that?
00:33:40.580 Do you think Zelensky is just lying and he's trying to keep the public from panicking?
00:33:45.700 Or does he really not think that Putin will cross the line because maybe the price is too high?
00:33:52.900 Let me ask you this.
00:33:54.100 Remember I said that Putin doesn't know what kind of weapons would be thrown against him?
00:34:00.580 Because this should be the first time the most modern, at least American, weaponry gets used in that kind of battle
00:34:07.300 against a sophisticated foe.
00:34:12.660 What happens if Putin goes into battle and gets a bloody nose?
00:34:17.520 He could.
00:34:21.180 Now here's something I don't think any of you thought of.
00:34:24.460 All right.
00:34:25.600 We know that the United States has incredible cyber warfare capabilities.
00:34:30.460 We assume so, right?
00:34:32.020 Maybe not, but you make the assumption that the United States does.
00:34:36.000 There are other countries you'd make that assumption about.
00:34:39.360 Israel.
00:34:40.820 You would assume they have great cyber warfare capabilities.
00:34:43.680 You think China does?
00:34:46.720 You think Russia does?
00:34:48.500 Great Britain, France, probably.
00:34:50.920 Right?
00:34:51.120 So you can name a number of countries that you're pretty sure have the best cyber warfare capabilities.
00:34:57.000 Now, does the United States sell weapons to Ukraine?
00:35:04.600 Actually, I don't know the answer to that.
00:35:06.380 Do we sell them weapons directly, or does it go through some kind of middle channel for any reason?
00:35:12.820 We do it directly, right?
00:35:15.180 Yeah.
00:35:15.600 I think we...
00:35:16.340 Do we sell it, or do we provide them?
00:35:18.800 We sell them, right?
00:35:20.220 So the Stinger missiles and the anti-tank missiles, we sell them.
00:35:24.220 So, would you agree with the following statement, we can sell them weapons?
00:35:29.120 Yes, right?
00:35:31.100 There's nothing that would stop us from selling weapons.
00:35:34.120 Could you...
00:35:35.520 This is going to blow the top of your head off.
00:35:38.460 Wait for this.
00:35:40.220 Could you sell cyber warfare as a service?
00:35:45.460 As a service.
00:35:47.680 And here's what I mean by that.
00:35:49.500 You say to Ukraine, and it doesn't have to be the United States, it could be an ally.
00:35:54.620 It could be Israel.
00:35:56.100 Could Israel...
00:35:56.900 I'll just...
00:35:57.460 Well, let me not throw Israel under the bus.
00:35:59.660 They have enough problems.
00:36:01.060 Let me pick a country.
00:36:03.300 Elbonia.
00:36:04.520 Could Elbonia, a made-up country with a great cyber warfare capability, say to Ukraine,
00:36:11.880 we will sell you the services, but you can't have the IP or the tools?
00:36:17.040 We'll keep the tools, so you can't do this on your own.
00:36:20.060 But as a service, if you push this button, it will turn off the lights in Moscow.
00:36:29.860 And then the Ukrainians would have to be the ones that push the button, but whatever happens
00:36:35.100 after they push the button goes through the cyber warfare, cyber warfare as a service.
00:36:40.760 By the way, those of you who work in technology, when I use the phrase software as a service,
00:36:48.840 you're familiar with that, this would be cyber warfare as a service.
00:36:53.100 Because you definitely don't want to give your cyber warfare tools to any country that doesn't
00:36:59.500 already have them, right?
00:37:01.760 Not even an ally, probably, I assume.
00:37:04.760 So you can't give your tools away, but you could sell...
00:37:08.300 Well, if you can sell a weapon, you could sell cyber warfare as a service.
00:37:14.660 You wouldn't be the one pushing the button.
00:37:17.360 You would just be the one who has a network that that, you know, chain of connections went
00:37:22.360 through.
00:37:24.580 Is that illegal?
00:37:26.700 What would stop it from happening?
00:37:28.840 Now, let me ask you this.
00:37:32.560 If Ukraine could buy that service, it'd be expensive, but if they could buy that service,
00:37:39.480 what damage could they do to Russia if Russia attacked Ukraine's, you know, more agreed-on
00:37:47.580 territory?
00:37:49.360 Here's the answer.
00:37:51.560 Putin doesn't know.
00:37:53.840 Am I right?
00:37:55.700 Putin doesn't know.
00:37:56.860 And isn't that a pretty big risk?
00:38:01.580 Are you telling me that nobody thought of this?
00:38:05.880 Right?
00:38:06.340 So in order for this not to be a real thing already, would require that the best cyber warfare
00:38:14.940 strategic thinker in the country is me.
00:38:18.600 Okay, we agree that's not the case?
00:38:22.380 Right?
00:38:23.100 If I thought of it, that's all I'm saying.
00:38:26.020 If I thought of it, it's already done.
00:38:30.360 Am I right?
00:38:31.940 And we can't know for sure.
00:38:33.800 But if it's obvious enough that the cartoonist thought of it, it's got to be an option, at
00:38:42.280 least.
00:38:43.440 At least it's an option.
00:38:45.260 Now, we don't know if Ukraine has access to that kind of power indirectly through a service
00:38:50.380 provider.
00:38:50.880 But why wouldn't they?
00:38:53.780 Why wouldn't they?
00:38:55.180 Now, it could be that that would, you know, whoever provided the service would then become
00:38:59.780 a target.
00:39:00.980 But are you telling me that the people who have cyber warfare capability couldn't hide the
00:39:07.600 tools so that by the time the attack happens, it's just not clear where it came from?
00:39:12.660 I feel like they could.
00:39:16.500 So, I don't know.
00:39:19.000 That's something Putin has to worry about.
00:39:21.040 So that would suggest that maybe Putin isn't going to cross a line that would open up Ukraine's
00:39:27.320 whole toolbox of weaponry.
00:39:30.000 Willman is saying, naive.
00:39:34.580 Did you see the title to my live stream today?
00:39:38.980 Did everybody read the title to the live stream?
00:39:42.120 I said this would be my misinformed opinion on Ukraine and probably the best ones you hear
00:39:49.320 today.
00:39:50.680 I'm going to stand by both of those statements.
00:39:53.680 So you don't need to tell me I'm naive or misinformed.
00:39:58.060 That's the show.
00:40:00.000 That's the show description.
00:40:03.000 Misinformed and naive and talking about world events.
00:40:07.660 If that bothers you, good luck finding somebody who's doing a better job.
00:40:16.300 The problem is that the quality of commentary on this topic is so low that if you think my
00:40:24.980 commentary, which is misinformed and is naive, if you think it's going to be less than the
00:40:32.000 average you're going to see today, well, I'd say pay attention to the average because I think
00:40:38.880 we're going to be in the same ballpark, if you know what I mean.
00:40:41.540 So it's not because I'm awesome.
00:40:44.060 It's because I'm not really competing with an awesome field is what's happening here.
00:40:47.980 Here's a question I have not seen in the news.
00:40:52.420 Do these separatist regions that Russia just moved new troops into, do they want to be part
00:40:58.080 of Russia?
00:40:58.440 And isn't that the most important question today?
00:41:03.900 Now, I know they had a vote, right?
00:41:07.160 They had a vote about being part of Russia.
00:41:09.640 But does a vote mean anything in that part of the world?
00:41:12.560 I wouldn't put any credibility in a vote.
00:41:14.640 I'm saying mostly yeses, but I don't know if you really know that.
00:41:20.960 Now, I do believe if I Googled it, I would have the same opinion.
00:41:24.960 But I don't know if that really means anything.
00:41:30.740 Yeah, get a map.
00:41:33.120 Get a map.
00:41:35.360 Yeah, I get it.
00:41:36.320 I know the location is everything in this case.
00:41:40.460 All right, well, do you want to see the United States get involved in any kind of a war in
00:41:49.340 which we don't know if we're fighting for something that anybody wants?
00:41:53.340 Like, would we be fighting for the wrong side if the public actually wanted to be Russian
00:41:58.400 by some majority?
00:42:01.580 I don't know.
00:42:03.740 But the longer the...
00:42:06.460 You should just be aware that American news is not telling us if those separatist plays
00:42:12.520 want to be Russian.
00:42:14.220 That should be the main thing that they talk about, shouldn't it?
00:42:18.620 Isn't that the main thing that they should be talking about?
00:42:21.280 I don't think you'll see it on any news program today,
00:42:24.340 which tells you that our news is all propaganda.
00:42:28.860 It's funny, when I read about, you know, the fake news in Russia,
00:42:31.940 I no longer think it's worse than the United States.
00:42:36.760 I do think it's completely fake in Russia, but I don't think ours is better.
00:42:42.560 If our news were real, I know this is a provocative, you know, sounds like an overstatement,
00:42:50.500 but if our news were real, the top of the news every day would be about the opinions
00:42:56.220 of the separatist region public.
00:43:00.220 Do they want this or not?
00:43:02.140 And all they talk about is the Russian troop movements and the sanctions.
00:43:08.340 All the news is focusing on the fight.
00:43:11.480 They're not even focusing on, you know, the people who matter the most,
00:43:16.620 the public in those areas.
00:43:20.740 Well, we'll see if those sanctions make a difference.
00:43:24.860 I was complaining yesterday that nobody had estimated the economic cost to Russia of an attack.
00:43:31.400 But apparently there is a group called the analysts that, well, they're at Capital Economics.
00:43:38.240 So they are doing some kind of estimates about what will happen to the GDP
00:43:41.380 under various scenarios of sanctions.
00:43:46.700 But even when the West had more power to sanction, I guess in 2014, we took 2.5% off of Russia's GDP.
00:43:59.800 But now probably Russia is in better shape to withstand sanctions, or at least sanctions of that level.
00:44:05.720 So they might be looking at it maybe a 1% or sub-5% change.
00:44:12.800 So would Putin take a chance for, let's say, temporarily degrading his GDP by 1% to 5%
00:44:20.000 to gain total control over the separatist regions only?
00:44:27.140 Or would that cost, given that he's giving up Nord Stream 2,
00:44:31.640 and he had to know that was going to happen,
00:44:34.200 would he be happy with just getting two separatist regions?
00:44:37.720 Or has he already paid enough that he has to go get the rest?
00:44:43.100 Because he sort of paid for it already.
00:44:46.780 I don't know. We'll find out.
00:44:50.000 So, I guess it was a shooting.
00:44:56.680 Some angry white guy with a gun confronted some people who were organizing,
00:45:02.440 just actually, I think people doing just the traffic control for Antifa and BLM and some protest,
00:45:08.900 and he ended up pulling out a gun and shooting some of them.
00:45:12.600 Now, of course, I don't condone any of that.
00:45:15.880 I condemn all the violence.
00:45:17.200 But the most predictable thing in the world was that if you got rid of the police
00:45:22.400 and you continued to have protests that were, you know, bothering the public,
00:45:29.840 somebody was going to pull a gun.
00:45:32.500 I'm actually surprised there's not more of it.
00:45:35.360 I don't want to see more of it.
00:45:36.560 But I'm surprised there hasn't been more.
00:45:41.460 So, you have to give some credit to the Second Amendment people
00:45:45.480 because there is a level of constraint
00:45:50.300 that, as horrible as, you know, these events are,
00:45:56.580 it's actually more controlled than I would expect,
00:45:59.120 given the craziness of the general public and the access to guns.
00:46:06.940 Kyle Rittenhouse is starting some kind of fund
00:46:09.540 to gather money to sue media people who have lied about him
00:46:14.520 and also for other people who get lied about
00:46:17.360 to have a way to sue the media.
00:46:20.920 Might come in handy.
00:46:21.980 Do you think I'll have any reasons to sue the media?
00:46:28.460 How many of the people in the media have called me a right winger?
00:46:35.080 There are a number of people in the major media
00:46:37.580 who have labeled me a right winger.
00:46:40.320 Now, that's the same as calling somebody a white nationalist in 2022.
00:46:45.400 So, if I tried to get a job
00:46:50.460 and I didn't already have, you know, a public profile
00:46:52.920 so, you know, I could do this sort of thing.
00:46:55.400 If I had to get a regular job, I couldn't get one.
00:46:59.560 Because somebody would Google me
00:47:01.040 and it would say he's a far-right guy.
00:47:04.520 They would translate it in their head to white nationalist
00:47:07.780 and I couldn't get a job anywhere.
00:47:10.660 Can I sue?
00:47:13.760 I don't know.
00:47:14.440 I mean, I wouldn't, but it's an interesting question.
00:47:19.120 And it also makes you wonder,
00:47:21.140 why didn't this already exist?
00:47:23.000 Because the press had no accountability.
00:47:26.340 Remember I told you that insurance
00:47:28.180 is the only thing that tells you
00:47:30.260 where things are really going to go?
00:47:32.240 Because eventually, everything has to get insured.
00:47:35.560 Everything in the business world, anyway.
00:47:37.420 So, it doesn't work so much in politics.
00:47:39.520 But within the business world,
00:47:41.180 if there's a business, you know, element to it,
00:47:43.480 the insurance companies will decide what you can and can't do.
00:47:48.380 Because they will charge you too much
00:47:50.440 for things that they say are too dangerous.
00:47:52.420 So, it's really predictive.
00:47:55.920 And what's going to happen
00:47:58.480 now that there would be an organized entity
00:48:02.000 just to sue the media for lying
00:48:04.060 when their business model depends on lying?
00:48:07.800 Because it does.
00:48:09.540 The media's business model depends on lying.
00:48:12.240 Because it's the lies that get all the clicks.
00:48:15.840 Right?
00:48:16.160 I mean, they're not going to say it that way.
00:48:19.140 But, it's the truth.
00:48:23.300 Is that true?
00:48:28.540 Somebody's saying that the Ukrainian President Zelensky
00:48:31.180 is an economist and a cartoonist?
00:48:33.560 I know he's an actor, a comedic actor,
00:48:36.560 but he's not a cartoonist, is he?
00:48:38.740 And is he an economist?
00:48:41.460 Comedian.
00:48:43.320 Was he an economist?
00:48:46.220 Give me a fact check on that.
00:48:49.400 Economist or no?
00:48:50.920 Who's got a Wikipedia page up?
00:48:53.000 All right, I'll check for that.
00:48:53.900 Anyway, we might be seeing
00:48:56.900 a balance of power happening now.
00:49:00.120 One of the interesting things
00:49:01.400 that people are saying about CNN,
00:49:04.880 legal analysts,
00:49:06.140 is that CNN's got some real problems
00:49:08.260 because of all their sexual misconduct cases
00:49:12.340 that are high profile.
00:49:14.020 That if they don't settle them
00:49:15.600 and basically pay out tens of millions,
00:49:19.520 then they're going to have to be subject to,
00:49:22.580 what is it called?
00:49:23.640 Discovery.
00:49:25.060 Meaning that in the course of a lawsuit
00:49:28.720 about something specific,
00:49:31.160 a lot of CNN's dirty laundry could come out.
00:49:34.800 And I don't think they could survive it.
00:49:37.200 So CNN might be in a death spiral
00:49:40.460 because they're going to have some big lawsuits
00:49:44.240 from people who worked for CNN.
00:49:47.340 And then you're going to have lawsuits
00:49:49.160 coming from Rittenhouse
00:49:50.880 and probably other people
00:49:52.160 that buy into that business model he's building.
00:49:55.700 And I have a feeling that CNN
00:49:58.920 is going to get sued out of existence.
00:50:01.860 And there's nothing they can do about it.
00:50:04.120 Because if they don't settle,
00:50:06.220 or go bankrupt, I guess,
00:50:07.860 if they don't settle,
00:50:09.480 then they're subject to discovery,
00:50:12.220 and that's actually worse.
00:50:13.540 So they have a choice of going out of business
00:50:17.300 by paying off all these lawsuits
00:50:19.220 or going out of business by fighting them.
00:50:22.180 That might be their only two choices.
00:50:25.160 So keep an eye on that.
00:50:26.440 Here's something that progressives
00:50:33.180 and Democrats get wrong every time.
00:50:35.220 It's human motivation,
00:50:37.720 especially when math is involved.
00:50:40.820 Am I right?
00:50:42.120 The two things the left always get wrong,
00:50:45.220 and by the way, if you're new to me,
00:50:47.800 I identify as left of Bernie.
00:50:50.300 Because I like his goals.
00:50:52.220 I just don't like his math,
00:50:54.220 and I don't like how he thinks
00:50:56.080 about human motivation.
00:50:58.300 So I like the idea of helping everybody
00:51:00.800 and getting everybody into healthcare.
00:51:02.540 I just don't know how to do it.
00:51:04.680 And I'm not going to lie and say
00:51:06.440 that math is magic,
00:51:09.740 and I can figure out how to do it
00:51:11.320 in a way the country will accept.
00:51:12.960 It's the country accepting it part.
00:51:14.520 That's the hard part.
00:51:17.200 So here's something
00:51:19.960 that Democrats got very wrong,
00:51:23.940 and it's so obvious in hindsight,
00:51:26.040 it's painful.
00:51:27.260 And it goes like this.
00:51:29.180 What they wanted to do,
00:51:30.540 they, Democrats and progressives,
00:51:32.760 wanted to reform the justice system
00:51:35.240 such that the number of black people
00:51:38.520 in America who are sent to prison
00:51:40.580 gets a little closer
00:51:43.140 to the percentage of black people
00:51:44.620 in the public.
00:51:46.360 Now, in order to do that,
00:51:47.760 unfortunately,
00:51:49.080 just because of the percentages
00:51:50.500 of crime in whatever demographic groups,
00:51:53.920 in order to do that,
00:51:55.180 it requires,
00:51:56.360 it requires
00:51:58.260 letting people out of jail
00:52:00.980 who are necessarily going to commit more crimes
00:52:03.320 or not putting them in jail
00:52:05.040 in the first place.
00:52:06.100 Am I right?
00:52:06.660 I mean,
00:52:07.520 that is not in dispute.
00:52:11.480 That in order to get some kind of
00:52:13.540 what you would call racial balance,
00:52:16.600 I guess,
00:52:17.460 in jail,
00:52:18.400 it requires
00:52:19.700 letting out a lot of people
00:52:21.820 who will do more crimes.
00:52:24.640 Now,
00:52:25.340 who are those people being let out?
00:52:28.060 Well,
00:52:28.640 specifically,
00:52:29.440 they're trying to get people of color
00:52:30.900 to be less represented in jail,
00:52:33.540 I guess.
00:52:33.880 And so,
00:52:35.360 if you're letting out
00:52:36.240 a lot of black
00:52:37.180 known criminals
00:52:39.380 back into the community,
00:52:41.820 will they commit more crimes?
00:52:44.300 Well,
00:52:44.580 yes,
00:52:45.420 because many of them
00:52:46.200 are career criminals.
00:52:47.840 So,
00:52:48.120 a career criminal
00:52:48.740 doesn't do one crime
00:52:49.980 and then stop.
00:52:51.840 They do crimes
00:52:53.000 until they get caught.
00:52:54.800 So,
00:52:55.380 if you put one criminal
00:52:57.320 in prison,
00:52:59.160 how many victims
00:53:00.560 do you save?
00:53:02.540 Dozens?
00:53:03.880 Hundreds?
00:53:05.300 Depends on the criminal,
00:53:06.300 right?
00:53:07.360 So,
00:53:08.040 for every good deed,
00:53:10.380 which is not put,
00:53:11.620 let's say,
00:53:12.100 a good deed
00:53:12.460 from the perspective
00:53:13.220 of the left,
00:53:14.520 some people on the left,
00:53:15.800 the good deed
00:53:16.700 would be not putting
00:53:17.680 somebody in prison
00:53:18.520 if you can avoid it.
00:53:21.600 But unfortunately,
00:53:22.560 that requires,
00:53:23.720 because of,
00:53:24.600 why?
00:53:25.640 Math
00:53:26.160 and human motivation.
00:53:28.020 The human motivation is
00:53:30.540 if somebody's
00:53:31.040 a career criminal
00:53:31.860 and they're not in jail,
00:53:33.960 what is their motivation?
00:53:35.720 Do more crimes?
00:53:37.340 Create more victims?
00:53:39.440 Right?
00:53:39.940 And how about the math?
00:53:41.880 The math is
00:53:42.680 that one person
00:53:43.520 that you helped
00:53:44.480 by not putting them
00:53:45.940 in jail
00:53:46.360 created seven people.
00:53:49.600 I'll just pick a number.
00:53:50.940 I'm just making up a number.
00:53:52.160 Created seven victims
00:53:53.680 who are,
00:53:56.800 and this is the
00:53:57.660 messed up part,
00:53:59.280 almost all black.
00:54:02.180 So,
00:54:02.840 if you can save
00:54:03.660 one black person
00:54:04.580 from going to jail,
00:54:06.080 that's great
00:54:07.300 if that one black person
00:54:09.120 then goes on
00:54:09.880 to have a successful life
00:54:11.480 as a productive
00:54:12.640 member of society.
00:54:14.120 And if you could identify
00:54:15.380 just those people,
00:54:17.280 well,
00:54:17.440 that would be kind of awesome.
00:54:19.060 In fact,
00:54:19.520 that's what the Trump
00:54:20.160 administration
00:54:20.660 tried to do
00:54:21.460 by having the
00:54:22.740 early release.
00:54:24.560 Because if you find
00:54:25.300 somebody who's going
00:54:25.960 to work on,
00:54:26.720 let's say,
00:54:27.240 a trade or a skill,
00:54:29.540 you're probably
00:54:30.260 finding somebody
00:54:31.020 who's a good bet
00:54:31.940 relative to a career
00:54:33.960 criminal who's not
00:54:34.800 working on anything
00:54:35.640 else.
00:54:36.580 Right?
00:54:37.540 So,
00:54:38.360 you should have been
00:54:39.100 able to predict
00:54:39.940 that by trying
00:54:41.060 to help
00:54:41.620 the segment
00:54:44.220 of the world
00:54:45.480 that is mostly
00:54:46.600 black people
00:54:47.280 going to jail,
00:54:48.640 you end up
00:54:50.080 with seven times
00:54:51.420 worse outcomes
00:54:53.100 for black people.
00:54:54.660 And you've
00:54:55.420 taken the pain
00:54:56.220 away from the person
00:54:57.740 who's causing
00:54:58.340 the problem
00:54:58.900 and you spread it
00:55:00.480 to the victims
00:55:01.100 who weren't causing
00:55:01.840 any problem.
00:55:03.720 So,
00:55:04.580 how does anybody
00:55:07.000 who is a Republican
00:55:08.120 ever lose
00:55:08.900 an election again?
00:55:12.480 Do you know
00:55:13.200 the only thing
00:55:14.000 that could
00:55:14.400 screw up
00:55:15.340 2022
00:55:16.160 in 2024
00:55:18.480 is Trump
00:55:20.000 talking?
00:55:21.680 That's it.
00:55:22.960 Now,
00:55:23.480 when I said that,
00:55:24.220 you said to yourself,
00:55:25.080 ha ha,
00:55:26.000 he thinks Trump
00:55:27.680 will do something
00:55:28.420 dumb
00:55:28.860 that will ruin
00:55:30.180 a good situation.
00:55:31.660 No.
00:55:32.620 No.
00:55:33.120 I mean,
00:55:33.520 that's always a risk.
00:55:35.080 But that's not
00:55:35.900 what I'm saying.
00:55:36.720 I'm saying if he
00:55:37.440 says anything,
00:55:38.700 if Trump
00:55:39.740 even just
00:55:40.440 talks,
00:55:42.660 they'll find
00:55:43.520 a way to
00:55:44.020 turn it into
00:55:45.140 the worst thing
00:55:46.240 in the world.
00:55:47.400 So,
00:55:47.940 he can't
00:55:49.160 do anything.
00:55:50.360 If Biden
00:55:51.200 proved anything
00:55:52.200 during the last
00:55:53.280 election,
00:55:54.180 he proved that
00:55:54.880 the less we see
00:55:55.820 of the politician,
00:55:56.680 the more we like.
00:55:58.980 I wouldn't have
00:55:59.780 guessed that.
00:56:00.760 But I think
00:56:01.180 if you're already,
00:56:02.500 you know,
00:56:03.280 you're already
00:56:04.080 a known quantity,
00:56:05.140 the less they see
00:56:05.940 of you,
00:56:06.240 the better.
00:56:06.980 Because otherwise
00:56:07.580 it's just giving you
00:56:08.400 reasons to be attacked.
00:56:10.560 So,
00:56:11.640 Scott has identified
00:56:14.480 peak Trump time.
00:56:16.280 Best to understand
00:56:17.180 this.
00:56:18.220 Don't know
00:56:18.580 what that means.
00:56:22.440 If he's re-elected,
00:56:23.960 he'll have a mandate.
00:56:24.880 He'll always talk
00:56:25.740 to the press.
00:56:26.520 Trump would.
00:56:28.380 All right.
00:56:30.160 And that,
00:56:32.240 ladies and gentlemen,
00:56:33.640 is my show
00:56:34.260 for today.
00:56:35.500 No doubt
00:56:36.020 the best analysis
00:56:37.240 you've ever seen
00:56:38.240 of the Ukraine
00:56:38.920 situation.
00:56:39.540 Do you need to
00:56:51.700 talk to the
00:57:01.960 top as
00:57:07.080 one?