Episode 1667 Scott Adams: What Happens Next in Ukraine. And Welcome to WWIII. You'll Be Fine
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 8 minutes
Words per Minute
134.38724
Summary
In this episode of The Sip Live from Switzerland, I'm joined by my good friend Mike Cernovich to talk about the latest in the Ukraine crisis and the possible start of World War III. We talk about Marco Rubio's latest conspiracy theory about Putin and the Ukraine, as well as the recent events in Ukraine.
Transcript
00:00:00.920
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to not only the best place in the world at the best
00:00:11.240
According to science, no one has ever died in World War III while watching this live
00:00:23.460
And how to make sure that you're as safe as possible on the inside as well as the outside.
00:00:30.500
Well, you might need a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice of time, a canteen jug
00:00:38.320
Fill it with your favorite beverage I like, coffee.
00:00:43.020
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine here today, the thing that makes
00:01:00.000
So, Switzerland, you feeling neutral now or are you feeling a little more than neutral?
00:01:13.140
Well, let's talk about all the things happening today.
00:01:31.300
Wouldn't it be a war that involved basically all the industrialized countries of the world
00:01:39.060
Now, keep in mind that even in World War II, most of the citizen population of the world
00:01:49.840
You know, 60 million people did die in World War II, so that's not nothing.
00:01:55.840
But most people had an impact financially or otherwise.
00:02:02.000
And I think we're in World War III because the global financial markets have decided to hell
00:02:14.340
And you can see the financial markets start to close in on Russia, which will probably impact
00:02:21.420
energy, which will impact all of us, which will impact inflation, which will impact all
00:02:27.920
I think we get a lot of fertilizer from Russia.
00:02:31.200
You know, there's a lot of, you know, grain that comes out of the Ukraine for the world.
00:02:41.480
But would you agree with me, would you agree with me that this could legitimately be called
00:02:50.200
Because I don't know how you define it other than a war that substantially affects everybody,
00:03:09.080
And I recommend you follow Mike Cernovich whenever we're in the fog of war.
00:03:17.960
One of the reasons is that he will remind you over and over again not to believe stuff
00:03:26.900
And he's doing a good job of that, especially during this Ukraine thing.
00:03:31.460
There are some things, I think I've, I think I'm guilty of tweeting some things that are
00:03:42.920
And so, you know, he's helping me keep my guardrails on as well.
00:03:46.980
Well, so follow, follow somebody who can remind you not to believe what you see.
00:03:56.500
I'm not sure you'll ever, you should ever believe it.
00:03:58.900
But for a while, it's real helpful to have people do that.
00:04:03.100
So, that's, you know, quite a service he's providing at the moment.
00:04:07.240
So, here are some things which maybe you shouldn't believe.
00:04:11.780
Do you remember the video, was it Snake Island, the little island where the alleged Ukrainian
00:04:20.140
fighters said F you to the Russian warship and then the Russian warship killed them all?
00:04:33.660
But then after reading some of Surninovich's tweets, I thought, hmm, not necessarily.
00:04:40.320
So, I'm going to put that one in the maybe, but not, not, I'm not confident enough in it
00:04:48.080
But it could have, maybe, shouldn't change anything one way or the other, but that's
00:04:58.360
Speaking of which, is this propaganda, or does Marco Rubio know something that you don't
00:05:09.440
I wish I could share more, but for now, I can say it's pretty obvious to many that something
00:05:15.960
He has always been a killer, but his problem now is different and significant.
00:05:21.440
It would be a mistake to assume this Putin would react the same way he would have five
00:05:28.840
Now, is Marco Rubio tied into enough of the intelligence apparatus to know that he has good
00:05:40.540
intel from behind the scenes that there's something up with Putin and he can't tell you
00:05:57.940
Because one would assume he had access to insider information.
00:06:05.840
Marco Rubio, which committee is he on that would give him access?
00:06:10.560
And I'm not even sure he'd need to be on a committee, because he could hear stuff without
00:06:23.180
But whatever he's on, I'm pretty sure he's on something that gives him access.
00:06:29.160
However, you should not believe that he necessarily knows something credible.
00:06:33.240
What you should believe is that even if he didn't know something credible, this is probably
00:06:41.660
Because everybody's saying anything in public, especially people who have a big platform,
00:06:52.700
Is it Marco Rubio's job to tell you something accurate?
00:06:57.900
Or should he tell you something that might be good for Ukraine?
00:07:07.800
In normal times, I would say his obligation is to give it to us straight.
00:07:15.540
You know, to help the good guys win, whoever the good guys are?
00:07:22.320
Because I'm not entirely sure what is the moral or ethical way to play this.
00:07:26.860
If he imagined that simply suggesting that Putin was different in whatever way you wanted
00:07:33.400
to imagine, which would be bad for Putin, whatever it was, maybe it doesn't need to be true.
00:07:46.240
This is one situation where, if your government's going to lie to you,
00:07:50.920
sometimes all you ask is that they had a good reason.
00:07:55.680
I know some of you are absolutists about honesty, and I get that.
00:08:02.160
But in the real world, people also look at what the total impact of things is going to be
00:08:12.360
And it could be that our own government has decided that just bullshitting us totally on
00:08:17.320
what's going on might be good for the world, in somebody's legitimate opinion.
00:08:35.880
All right, you're all watching this, and if you've watched me for a while,
00:08:41.240
you, I hope, have come to the conclusion that I will try to be objective on pretty much everything.
00:08:49.620
I'm not objective on the question of fentanyl in China.
00:08:59.180
However, I don't know if I could be completely unbiased
00:09:04.380
in the context of literally being part of a world war.
00:09:08.760
And so, I'm going to give you that warning, that I feel like it's fair warning.
00:09:17.500
Let me know if this goes too far or not far enough.
00:09:20.860
I feel as if I can't promise you that I will intentionally try to be unbiased
00:09:35.280
So, that's, I don't know, maybe there's just no way to play this completely ethically.
00:09:41.280
Because the most ethical thing to do would be whatever helps the most people.
00:09:49.620
Maybe the truth is the only thing that helps people.
00:09:53.460
I mean, that would be a perfectly reasonable view.
00:10:00.000
Just be cautious when you listen to me on this topic.
00:10:02.540
The same way you should be cautious about every other person.
00:10:07.400
Just bring the same skepticism to everything I say.
00:10:11.360
And just know that you're doing it with my full awareness and permission.
00:10:15.960
This is one where you've got to watch me carefully.
00:10:22.580
I did a poll on Twitter, which, again, is my totally unbiased approach to this.
00:10:37.280
In my poll, I gave people four choices for what was the reason for Putin's apparent change.
00:10:46.380
We won't say that's true, but a lot of people are saying it.
00:11:01.900
But 11% of people thought maybe drugs were involved.
00:11:16.260
So it would be people like me, people like Marco Rubio, maybe just trying to bias things with the suggestion that he's insane.
00:11:27.060
And you would expect that our intelligence agencies would be trying to do that as well.
00:11:46.440
Now, of course, I primed you by putting that choice there in the first place.
00:11:52.220
So, you know, it's not scientific, and I primed you for it.
00:11:56.320
But still, 36%, I find that really encouraging.
00:12:00.720
Because it means people are sort of hyper-aware of that effect in a way that we're always aware.
00:12:11.680
There's a big difference between being aware that confirmation exists and being hyper-aware,
00:12:24.620
And I would say that something really, really healthy is happening, at least among the people who are following me.
00:12:32.380
And that 36% would just automatically go to that.
00:12:37.440
If you were going to bet, you know, if you saw how the public, at least this limited, unscientific sample of the public,
00:12:49.000
if you saw how they answered, and then I said to you, all right, now cast your bet.
00:12:53.240
If you had some magical way to know the truth later, which one do you bet on?
00:13:05.480
But even though that's not my opinion, my opinion is drugs.
00:13:17.300
So I'm putting, I guess, my cumulative life's knowledge about why people change and how they change and what drugs do to people
00:13:28.680
and what kind of people would be on what kind of drugs.
00:13:32.200
So I'm kind of bringing together like a whole bunch of parts of my skill stack, if I could put it that way.
00:13:40.080
And my opinion is, my opinion sides with the smallest number of the public, that is drugs.
00:13:49.640
Now it might also be mental health, but I'm sure drugs are involved.
00:13:55.220
I would say the odds that he's not on some kind of drug that is known to affect your cognitive or personality or something,
00:14:04.300
the odds of that are really small, in my opinion.
00:14:14.400
I think that's going to be one of the stories here.
00:14:17.540
On top of, perhaps, some health issues as well.
00:14:22.120
But if I had to bet on it, I would bet against myself.
00:14:27.520
If I had to put my actual money on it, I would bet against my own opinion that I hold quite firmly.
00:14:34.300
Because I'm also aware that confirmation bias is usually right.
00:15:00.480
was there one other person in the public domain
00:15:05.540
who told you that the Russian army might be surprised
00:15:09.440
by the, let's say, the effectiveness of the weapons
00:15:44.520
Now, when I read the stories that say that Ukraine has,
00:16:16.340
And the Russian army may have sent in some probes
00:16:21.900
And now they're assembling the resources they need
00:16:28.080
And then they'll encircle the city isn't taken over.
00:16:56.960
But I would say it's way too soon for me to say,
00:17:02.960
However, how good do you think an anti-tank missile is?
00:17:20.920
does the tank missile hit the tank most of the time?
00:17:27.020
I mean, is it pretty much one missile equals one tank,
00:17:34.140
One missile equals one tank pretty much every time?
00:17:37.980
Because it seems to me that if you could see a tank
00:17:43.620
it would be hard to mistake a tank with anything else.
00:17:49.240
And so the thing that I've been speculating about is,
00:18:27.560
if you have unlimited number of handheld anti-tank stuff.
00:18:34.580
Now, I saw a bunch of data that I don't believe
00:18:53.820
I don't believe they blew up 706 troop transport vehicles,
00:19:17.540
But how many missiles do you think Ukraine has?
00:19:21.200
Whatever the handheld anti-tank things are called.
00:19:56.360
to bring their heavy equipment into the country.
00:20:51.880
Because it seems like they could have a lot, right?