Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 22, 2022


Episode 1690 Scott Adams： Peace Deal Idea For Ukraine, Proof We Live In a Simulation, TikTok Manipulation


Episode Stats

Length

54 minutes

Words per Minute

140.32585

Word Count

7,674

Sentence Count

577

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

22


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning ladies and gentlemen and all of your pets. I assume you've trained your pets to watch
00:00:09.840 the live stream. Is there anybody out there who's got a cat or a dog who are just doing their own
00:00:15.100 thing during my live stream? It's rude, really. So if you've got a cat or a dog, get some treats
00:00:21.640 and train them to sit in front of this live stream with you. And if you'd like both you and
00:00:27.440 your pet to go to a new level, well you're going to need a dish for your dog. But for you, a cup
00:00:33.620 or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen jug, a flask or a vessel of any kind. And you take
00:00:39.040 that thing and you fill it with your favorite beverage. I like coffee. And join me now for the
00:00:45.460 unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes what? That's right. Everything
00:00:53.520 better. Everything. Go.
00:01:00.460 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Whoa. Well, in the news today, Trump won a court case over his defamation suit
00:01:15.180 that Stormy Daniels was, I guess, suing Trump for defamation. And Trump, at least he prevailed
00:01:25.240 in court and now Stormy Daniels owes him $300,000. Now, there are a lot of people who say, how
00:01:36.900 could you say Trump is so smart? And they'll give some examples, right? But Trump is the only
00:01:43.580 person I ever know, I've ever heard of, who slept with a porn star and got paid $300,000
00:01:50.520 for it. I'm just, I'm just saying. Now, I know, I know he's just breaking even because
00:01:57.000 it's just paying back for his lawyer's fees, but still it's funny. It's funny when the prostitute
00:02:04.760 returns any money to the customer. Allegedly, because Trump says he had no affair with this
00:02:10.580 woman. No affair. No affair. Totally didn't happen. All right. Our president, who was elected,
00:02:19.640 Biden, almost entirely on the assumption that he would be adult leadership and, more importantly,
00:02:27.600 he would not lie to the public the way that awful President Trump did. And yet, he did stand
00:02:35.000 in front of the public and lie about Hunter's laptop being Russian misinformation. At what point
00:02:41.980 do we acknowledge that the reason he was elected didn't pan out? Somebody says elected in quotes.
00:02:54.840 Now, that would be a funny way to treat the 2020 election. What if instead of, you know, making any
00:03:01.060 kind of accusation about the accuracy of it, instead of that, what if every time you talked
00:03:06.660 about it, you just put the election in quotes? Sort of a very low-grade protest. All right.
00:03:15.720 Britt Hume is tweeting on Kamala Harris. Did you see her speech talking about the significance
00:03:23.400 of the passage of the passage of time? So, Kamala Harris has become almost like a Colbert character,
00:03:31.740 except for liberals. You remember when Colbert used to do the fake conservative character for
00:03:37.820 his show? And Kamala Harris actually just sounds like she's doing a parody. Allow me to do a parody
00:03:47.120 that sounds exactly like the real thing. Well, we were just talking about the significance of time
00:03:56.000 and how the significance of time is sometimes overlooked, because over a long time period,
00:04:04.000 the significance of the time will be more than the shorter period of time. Because time,
00:04:11.400 if you look at it over its entire significance, can be something that starts as insignificant
00:04:17.680 and becomes significant over time. Because the passage of time creates the significance.
00:04:28.400 So that, ladies and gentlemen,
00:04:31.800 I just saw a meme that made me laugh and hate myself at the same time.
00:04:39.600 Have you ever laughed at a meme and said,
00:04:42.500 I hate myself for laughing at that? I'm not a good person, but...
00:04:48.120 Okay, that just happened.
00:04:52.720 And I think it's important that Kamala Harris has reminded us of the significance of the passage
00:04:58.160 of time. Do you know why time is significant?
00:05:04.500 That's right. Because if we didn't have the significance of time,
00:05:08.600 everything would happen at the same moment.
00:05:12.860 That's no fun. Everything's just going to happen at the same time.
00:05:16.940 No, I think Kamala Harris is on to something
00:05:18.560 about the significance of the passage of time.
00:05:22.220 We overlook that.
00:05:26.820 As Mike Cernovich was recently commenting in a different scenario, I think,
00:05:32.160 or maybe it was this scenario, I forget,
00:05:33.480 that when you see all the mistakes go in one direction,
00:05:37.740 you should start asking some questions.
00:05:41.060 Is there another example in the news of all the mistakes seem to go in one direction?
00:05:47.220 Well, Dr. Nicole Sapphire tweets that this week the CDC removed a total of 30,000 COVID deaths
00:05:55.780 from the dashboard for young people.
00:05:58.940 It reduced the total pediatric deaths by 24%.
00:06:04.320 They said it was a coding error.
00:06:07.020 Just a little bit of a coding error that changed the numbers by 25%.
00:06:11.920 That's right.
00:06:13.760 A little bit of a coding error that changed, some would argue,
00:06:17.940 the most important number by 24%.
00:06:22.260 That's a pretty big change.
00:06:25.080 And as Cernovich would remind you, and I will echo that,
00:06:31.260 you have to watch for problems that all seem to be in the same direction.
00:06:36.680 You know what I mean?
00:06:37.940 I'd just keep an eye on this one.
00:06:40.180 See if there's this slow trickle of information
00:06:43.660 that says COVID wasn't nearly as bad as we thought.
00:06:47.920 Do you think that's going to happen?
00:06:49.020 Now, a 25% change probably wouldn't have changed any policies.
00:06:56.680 But you don't have to get much bigger than 25% before it looks like it might have.
00:07:02.180 You know, if you said the pandemic was really 25% fewer deaths than we thought,
00:07:07.600 I don't think it would change anything, would it?
00:07:10.480 25%.
00:07:11.120 50%, maybe.
00:07:13.800 But I don't know about 25%.
00:07:15.760 It affects trust.
00:07:17.420 Yes, that's true.
00:07:19.480 But I don't know how you could have less trust in something you don't trust at all.
00:07:24.640 Well, I was reading up on TikTok in an Axios story.
00:07:28.460 Did you know that 63% of American kids have TikTok?
00:07:33.040 Did you know that?
00:07:34.280 Did you know that if you write the words TikTok
00:07:37.680 on the Locals platform,
00:07:42.380 the spell checker will correctly put the brand name there?
00:07:46.680 T-I-K-T-O-K.
00:07:49.700 With no space.
00:07:51.280 Did you know that if you try to write that same thing
00:07:53.340 in the title to its competitor here on YouTube,
00:07:58.800 that it won't correct it to the correct spelling?
00:08:02.620 Yeah, yeah.
00:08:03.420 You have to work at it.
00:08:05.120 You know, it's kind of like,
00:08:05.960 did you mean tick flock?
00:08:08.140 No.
00:08:09.020 No.
00:08:09.360 TikTok.
00:08:10.180 Did you mean flick block?
00:08:13.180 No.
00:08:13.920 No.
00:08:14.280 TikTok.
00:08:15.640 Now, it might have been my bad typing,
00:08:17.540 but I believe that YouTube didn't want me to say TikTok.
00:08:20.880 That's all I'm saying.
00:08:21.540 So here's what we've learned about their algorithm.
00:08:26.980 And I want to put this in persuasion frame.
00:08:32.400 Have I taught you way too many times?
00:08:35.440 Yeah, ducking TikTok.
00:08:37.360 Have I taught you way too many times
00:08:39.620 that pacing and leading is good and basic persuasion?
00:08:46.180 The pacing part is where you agree
00:08:48.840 or match the person you're trying to persuade.
00:08:52.340 So if they wear a blue shirt, you wear a blue shirt.
00:08:55.280 If they talk loud, you talk loud.
00:08:57.620 If they use, let's say, a lot of war analogies,
00:09:00.640 like jumping on the hand grenade and taking that hill,
00:09:04.140 well, you use war analogies.
00:09:06.580 So basically, the more you can match somebody you want to persuade
00:09:10.600 by pacing them,
00:09:12.360 the more influential you'll be when you try to lead them.
00:09:16.260 Leading meaning instead of following them,
00:09:19.400 you do your own thing and try to get them to follow you.
00:09:22.560 So first you match them,
00:09:24.660 and then when you take a break from what you've matched,
00:09:28.500 they're somewhat automatically and subconsciously will match you.
00:09:34.100 So it's basic known persuasion technique.
00:09:38.380 Here's what the TikTok algorithm does
00:09:40.720 that others do not.
00:09:43.300 The Instagram algorithm, for example,
00:09:46.200 wants to show you things that Instagram wants to show you.
00:09:50.100 Am I right?
00:09:51.000 So it's going to show you more famous people and celebrities
00:09:53.720 and high-quality stuff.
00:09:57.260 Whereas the TikTok algorithm, we're told,
00:10:00.560 simply gives you more of what you've shown you like.
00:10:03.700 So if you click on a certain thing,
00:10:05.140 it's going to give you an endless stream of that
00:10:07.160 until you try something else.
00:10:08.780 So what happens if you have an app
00:10:11.460 that just keeps giving you everything you want,
00:10:14.060 like really specifically everything you want?
00:10:17.640 Do you know what happens?
00:10:19.420 Well, first of all, you get addicted to it
00:10:21.280 because it's giving you everything you want.
00:10:23.140 It's like it's reading your mind practically.
00:10:26.480 The second thing that happens is
00:10:28.100 if they decide to lead,
00:10:31.100 you will have been so paced
00:10:33.220 that anything you see on TikTok
00:10:35.300 is going to look real to you,
00:10:37.460 especially if you're 12 years old.
00:10:42.640 So TikTok is the ultimate brainwashing machine.
00:10:46.240 And I believe the only reason it's legal
00:10:48.500 is because there's not a general understanding
00:10:52.900 of how powerful it is.
00:10:55.040 If people understood
00:10:56.320 how much influence TikTok could have,
00:10:58.940 now I don't know if it's been weaponized,
00:11:00.660 so I don't know if it's ever been used
00:11:02.900 to specifically create something.
00:11:06.900 I know there are some Chinese stories
00:11:09.280 like Tiananmen Square
00:11:10.180 that have been banned on TikTok or suppressed,
00:11:14.620 but that's not what I'm talking about.
00:11:17.340 I'm not talking about just hiding things.
00:11:19.880 I'm talking about making somebody think a new thing
00:11:22.120 that they didn't think before.
00:11:23.760 And TikTok is just ideally suited for that.
00:11:28.940 Now, if you didn't know,
00:11:30.140 TikTok is owned by a Chinese company,
00:11:32.300 which means that the Chinese government
00:11:34.240 can get any of their data
00:11:36.220 just by telling them to give it to them.
00:11:39.360 And they could tell TikTok
00:11:41.040 to run any content they wanted
00:11:44.220 and just feed it to people
00:11:45.800 as something that they would consume
00:11:48.580 just like all the other stuff they were consuming.
00:11:50.300 So, TikTok really should be banned.
00:11:55.380 Apparently, there's some effort
00:11:56.440 to get the American customer data
00:12:00.020 into some kind of a server in the United States
00:12:03.020 so that China doesn't have access to it.
00:12:07.520 But it feels a little too late for that.
00:12:09.840 63% of American young people are on it.
00:12:16.380 All right.
00:12:17.100 Here is proof of the simulation.
00:12:20.860 I saw a tweet by a Twitter user
00:12:24.500 who calls himself Dr. Fauci's prison butt.
00:12:28.220 I have no comment about the name he chooses.
00:12:31.460 But Dr. Fauci's prison butt,
00:12:34.360 he says this,
00:12:36.080 the fact that in quantum physics,
00:12:38.400 observing a particle changes the behavior
00:12:40.720 of that particle,
00:12:42.260 to me, proves this is a simulation.
00:12:44.260 It's the game rendering itself in real time.
00:12:49.500 I agree.
00:12:51.340 I agree.
00:12:52.300 The fact that in physics,
00:12:53.860 we know this beyond a doubt.
00:12:55.960 All right.
00:12:56.140 So this is not a speculation.
00:12:57.720 In physics, we know
00:12:58.800 that observation changes the behavior of stuff.
00:13:02.880 And it doesn't even have to be human observation.
00:13:05.440 It could be a machine measurement
00:13:06.860 can change the behavior of a thing
00:13:09.120 even without touching it.
00:13:10.240 It's simply the knowledge of the...
00:13:12.700 If you can believe this,
00:13:14.700 it's the knowledge about the particle
00:13:16.280 that changes it.
00:13:17.960 It's not even the...
00:13:19.220 It's not because you shine light on it
00:13:20.940 or you split it.
00:13:22.080 It's not because you're manipulating it.
00:13:25.320 We've literally...
00:13:26.380 We've literally learned
00:13:27.580 that simply knowledge of it changes it.
00:13:29.660 Now, how can that make sense?
00:13:34.220 The only way it makes sense
00:13:35.140 is that we live in a software-like simulation
00:13:38.580 that is authoring itself on demand.
00:13:41.880 The only time things become what they need to be
00:13:44.560 is when you're there
00:13:45.440 or there's some machine there measuring it.
00:13:48.920 Because later, we would have access to the measurements,
00:13:51.320 so that's the same thing.
00:13:53.600 How do you know what it was doing before observing?
00:13:55.620 I'm not the physicist who can answer that question,
00:14:01.440 but we do measure...
00:14:03.340 There is a way to do it
00:14:04.540 which you would be satisfied with
00:14:07.500 if it were described to you.
00:14:09.720 But I won't...
00:14:10.800 I'm not capable of doing that.
00:14:13.400 All right.
00:14:15.020 So that's one...
00:14:16.140 I would say that that's pretty good proof
00:14:19.660 of the simulation.
00:14:20.940 The other thing is our massive differences
00:14:23.860 in opinions.
00:14:25.620 or movies.
00:14:27.600 Of course, you've noticed
00:14:29.200 that it's not a case of
00:14:31.480 some people are smarter
00:14:32.500 and some people aren't.
00:14:33.880 That's how you used to think of it, right?
00:14:36.060 You used to say,
00:14:37.700 hey, some people believe X
00:14:39.180 and some people believe Y,
00:14:40.860 but the people who believe Y
00:14:42.280 are under-informed.
00:14:43.980 If they did more research,
00:14:45.740 they would all believe the same thing.
00:14:47.780 But it's clear now
00:14:48.920 that what you know
00:14:50.600 doesn't seem to impact what you believe
00:14:52.560 or how much research you do
00:14:55.120 or how smart you are,
00:14:57.140 none of it seems to matter.
00:14:58.520 At least not completely.
00:14:59.800 It matters a little bit.
00:15:01.500 And...
00:15:01.980 So I would say
00:15:06.780 that we're absolutely living
00:15:11.440 in an authored world.
00:15:12.780 and a couple more ways
00:15:15.240 that you can tell
00:15:16.180 is I've been testing recently
00:15:19.320 if I just speak out loud
00:15:22.760 to the creator of the simulation
00:15:24.660 and ask for something.
00:15:26.980 I've had the weirdest experiences recently.
00:15:31.260 Now, this is part of affirmations,
00:15:32.880 but without all the work.
00:15:35.400 So affirmations,
00:15:36.500 you sort of repeat what you want
00:15:37.760 over and over again.
00:15:38.800 But I've literally just talked
00:15:40.180 to the simulation.
00:15:42.280 Like, I literally talk out loud
00:15:43.480 like I'm talking to somebody
00:15:44.560 who can hear it.
00:15:45.960 And I say,
00:15:46.920 you know what I need?
00:15:48.560 Give me X.
00:15:50.360 And X is, like, really unlikely.
00:15:51.940 And then X happened.
00:15:55.660 I asked for some
00:15:56.980 really weirdly specific stuff
00:15:59.400 that happened.
00:16:00.300 Like, the odds of them happening
00:16:01.660 are, like, really low.
00:16:03.560 Boom.
00:16:04.180 It was just like I ordered a DoorDash.
00:16:06.940 Now, you should believe
00:16:08.960 that that's coincidence
00:16:09.840 and anecdotal
00:16:10.720 and means nothing.
00:16:12.520 But is there anybody here
00:16:13.840 who's had a recent experience
00:16:16.260 of asking the universe for something
00:16:18.040 and it just handed it up?
00:16:20.040 I'm just curious.
00:16:20.680 Now, you may be working
00:16:22.840 from a religious model
00:16:24.120 or whatever.
00:16:25.640 But look at the comments.
00:16:27.520 And I feel like the...
00:16:29.980 that it's happening
00:16:30.720 at a higher rate
00:16:31.860 than it ever happened.
00:16:33.960 Like, I've always asked
00:16:35.000 the universe for things
00:16:36.100 in various ways,
00:16:37.700 affirmations or positive thinking
00:16:39.400 or whatever.
00:16:40.280 But I feel like something changed
00:16:43.300 where it's almost like
00:16:45.860 a vending machine now.
00:16:47.580 If you just ask specifically
00:16:49.260 for what you want,
00:16:50.680 the odds of that thing
00:16:51.800 showing up are just crazy.
00:16:54.120 I mean, I wish I could give you examples
00:16:55.940 because, you know,
00:16:56.520 they're in my personal life
00:16:57.580 and it's none of your business.
00:17:00.300 But it's the specificity of them.
00:17:04.380 Did you ask for a divorce?
00:17:05.980 Yes.
00:17:07.420 Yes.
00:17:08.520 I did.
00:17:08.900 Now, the thing with divorce
00:17:13.160 that I think people
00:17:15.360 don't understand at all
00:17:16.620 is that when you decide
00:17:18.960 to get married,
00:17:19.620 it's because you want to.
00:17:22.020 And when you decide
00:17:22.740 to get divorced,
00:17:24.480 it's because you want to.
00:17:26.520 In both cases,
00:17:27.520 you're getting what you wanted.
00:17:30.640 A lot of people
00:17:31.520 are treating it like
00:17:32.260 it's a tragedy
00:17:33.240 for which they feel sorry for me.
00:17:35.020 I mean,
00:17:35.800 it's a problem
00:17:36.720 you have to work through.
00:17:38.620 But I don't know
00:17:39.460 if it's a tragedy
00:17:40.200 if you choose it.
00:17:41.620 Is it?
00:17:42.980 If it's a path
00:17:43.880 you decide to take?
00:17:45.720 I don't know.
00:17:46.180 I mean,
00:17:46.420 it could be hard,
00:17:47.700 but I don't know
00:17:48.480 that that's a tragedy.
00:17:51.220 So I don't think
00:17:51.860 that,
00:17:53.080 you know,
00:17:53.340 at least speaking
00:17:54.100 of my specific situation,
00:17:56.420 I'm pretty sure
00:17:57.440 that we're both better off.
00:17:59.380 So I don't have a
00:18:00.600 problem with it.
00:18:02.560 Yeah,
00:18:04.520 of course there's a prenup.
00:18:07.120 Of course.
00:18:11.040 I prayed for food
00:18:12.240 and then I ran over a cat.
00:18:16.060 All right.
00:18:19.160 Here's the other evidence
00:18:20.360 of the simulation.
00:18:21.380 It's the recurring problem thing.
00:18:23.600 So I would say
00:18:24.380 in the last,
00:18:25.220 you know,
00:18:25.520 number of years
00:18:27.040 or whatever,
00:18:28.020 I've had some really
00:18:29.300 weirdly specific
00:18:30.360 recurring problems
00:18:31.480 that I can't find
00:18:33.500 anybody who has
00:18:34.180 the same ones.
00:18:35.300 But mine just keep
00:18:35.940 coming in different form
00:18:37.420 but it's the same problem
00:18:38.360 just over and over again.
00:18:39.660 And I was just talking
00:18:40.520 to somebody else.
00:18:42.080 Yeah,
00:18:42.280 the water leak
00:18:43.020 is one of them.
00:18:43.720 But there are several
00:18:45.320 that are just
00:18:46.640 super recurring.
00:18:47.960 And I was talking
00:18:48.580 to somebody yesterday
00:18:49.440 who has their own
00:18:50.340 recurring problem
00:18:51.140 that I've never had.
00:18:53.000 So somebody else
00:18:54.160 has a completely
00:18:55.320 different recurring problem
00:18:56.580 I've never had once.
00:18:58.780 I don't think.
00:18:59.760 So how is that possible?
00:19:04.260 Well,
00:19:06.400 my belief is that
00:19:09.760 we're A-B testing
00:19:11.280 for some other
00:19:12.600 higher level
00:19:13.380 of civilization.
00:19:15.520 And at the moment,
00:19:17.280 those recurring things
00:19:18.400 that used to be happening
00:19:19.280 just in my life
00:19:20.380 are now happening
00:19:21.800 in the world.
00:19:23.780 Is it a coincidence
00:19:24.980 that we keep having
00:19:26.220 Russia problems?
00:19:27.100 Is that a coincidence?
00:19:30.440 Is it a coincidence
00:19:31.480 that we keep having
00:19:32.980 supply chain problems
00:19:34.320 in every form
00:19:36.220 you can have it?
00:19:38.260 Is it a coincidence
00:19:39.300 that we don't just
00:19:40.480 get one bad virus,
00:19:41.940 we get like
00:19:42.560 a cycle of them
00:19:44.120 to really see
00:19:46.060 if you're doing it right?
00:19:47.680 It feels to me
00:19:48.900 that even the Ukraine war
00:19:50.540 is an A-B test.
00:19:53.040 Testing the idea
00:19:54.240 of whether
00:19:55.480 a modern military
00:19:56.940 can attack
00:19:58.040 and conquer
00:19:58.540 another modern military
00:19:59.720 with a land war.
00:20:02.220 And I think
00:20:02.680 they're finding out
00:20:03.300 they can't.
00:20:04.720 And that's what
00:20:05.380 they're trying to find out.
00:20:06.780 Okay,
00:20:07.260 could all of this military
00:20:08.300 beat this military
00:20:09.260 if the little military
00:20:10.840 has access
00:20:11.540 to good weapons?
00:20:13.700 The answer is no.
00:20:15.780 So,
00:20:16.420 I don't know
00:20:17.420 that it's a coincidence
00:20:18.180 that the world
00:20:19.160 keeps serving up
00:20:20.260 the same things.
00:20:22.460 It's almost telling me
00:20:23.480 that Trump
00:20:23.920 is going to run again
00:20:24.760 for sure
00:20:25.380 because they want
00:20:27.360 to do one more test
00:20:28.680 of what happens
00:20:30.260 if somebody acts
00:20:31.060 a certain way.
00:20:33.680 I don't know.
00:20:34.640 I keep an eye on that.
00:20:36.320 But it certainly
00:20:37.280 looks like we're
00:20:38.000 in a simulation
00:20:38.600 and we're A-B testing
00:20:39.960 a number of problems.
00:20:44.520 Let's talk about
00:20:45.400 the Supreme Court nominee.
00:20:46.700 Blah, blah.
00:20:51.220 All Republicans
00:20:52.040 are racist.
00:20:53.040 Say Democrats.
00:20:54.980 Blah, blah.
00:20:57.920 Minority.
00:20:59.340 Check the box hiring.
00:21:01.660 Blah, blah.
00:21:02.640 It's all the usual stuff.
00:21:04.920 I don't think
00:21:05.720 there's anything
00:21:06.260 that's more boring
00:21:07.240 than this particular
00:21:08.280 Supreme Court nomination
00:21:09.760 because she's definitely
00:21:12.480 going to be nominated.
00:21:13.720 She has all the qualifications
00:21:16.860 as far as I can tell.
00:21:19.380 There's just nothing here.
00:21:21.500 There's nothing here.
00:21:22.400 She would be replacing
00:21:23.600 another liberal.
00:21:24.680 Even the court
00:21:25.160 doesn't change.
00:21:26.060 This is the most
00:21:26.920 nothing story.
00:21:28.440 And I'm looking at people
00:21:29.240 like Josh Hawley
00:21:30.400 who are taking a run
00:21:32.840 at her
00:21:33.520 to try to
00:21:34.620 try to degrade her
00:21:36.360 in some way.
00:21:37.000 I don't think
00:21:37.400 there's no way
00:21:37.960 that she's not going
00:21:38.600 to get nominated.
00:21:39.380 I don't think.
00:21:40.660 But isn't he just
00:21:41.780 wasting his time
00:21:42.480 and making himself
00:21:43.340 look bad?
00:21:44.700 What do you think
00:21:45.500 of the Josh Hawley
00:21:46.940 strategy
00:21:48.940 of obviously
00:21:50.480 he's getting
00:21:51.040 some attention
00:21:51.620 for himself
00:21:52.240 obviously
00:21:53.760 so that could be good
00:21:54.920 and he's probably
00:21:56.000 playing to his base
00:21:56.980 so the base likes it
00:21:59.740 probably
00:22:00.160 right?
00:22:01.540 But does it move
00:22:02.680 the needle in any way?
00:22:03.740 Does it help him
00:22:04.280 get elected
00:22:04.800 in the future?
00:22:06.760 I don't know.
00:22:07.180 It seems like
00:22:07.540 a waste of time.
00:22:08.960 The smartest thing
00:22:09.700 that I said this before
00:22:11.720 the smartest thing
00:22:13.240 the Republicans
00:22:13.860 could do
00:22:15.540 and it would be
00:22:16.840 really smart
00:22:17.580 is to just be
00:22:19.460 really polite to her
00:22:20.440 and then vote
00:22:21.560 unanimously
00:22:22.240 to put her
00:22:23.760 on the court.
00:22:25.000 Because what happens
00:22:25.960 the next time
00:22:26.600 the Republicans
00:22:27.200 nominate somebody?
00:22:29.880 The next time
00:22:30.840 Republicans
00:22:31.740 nominate somebody
00:22:32.600 they want to say
00:22:33.620 look
00:22:33.960 when you gave us
00:22:35.520 a nominee
00:22:35.960 that was solid
00:22:36.760 we gave you
00:22:37.780 100% support.
00:22:38.940 we're going to
00:22:40.520 give you a nominee
00:22:41.280 that we think
00:22:41.900 is solid
00:22:42.320 you give us
00:22:42.900 100% report.
00:22:44.480 Now I know
00:22:45.120 you're saying
00:22:45.560 it's payback
00:22:46.200 payback
00:22:46.740 but remember
00:22:48.180 how the news
00:22:48.860 treats precedent
00:22:49.880 the news
00:22:51.740 treats precedent
00:22:52.620 like it matters.
00:22:54.460 So if the
00:22:55.280 Republicans take
00:22:56.040 this one
00:22:56.440 that's really
00:22:57.120 a gimme
00:22:57.540 because you know
00:22:59.040 which way it's
00:22:59.500 going to go
00:22:59.920 they're not going
00:23:00.420 to stop the nomination
00:23:01.380 so if you know
00:23:02.740 it's going to turn
00:23:03.340 down a certain way
00:23:03.980 you might as well
00:23:04.480 grab whatever
00:23:05.060 advantage from it
00:23:06.060 you can
00:23:06.440 and grab the
00:23:07.660 advantage of saying
00:23:08.680 look
00:23:09.000 when you gave us
00:23:10.160 a qualified nominee
00:23:11.260 were we racist?
00:23:14.360 Did anybody
00:23:14.900 act racist
00:23:15.600 when you gave us
00:23:16.240 a qualified
00:23:16.840 or misogynist
00:23:17.920 when you gave us
00:23:19.300 a qualified
00:23:20.040 black
00:23:21.180 female candidate?
00:23:23.040 Did any
00:23:23.340 Republican have
00:23:24.500 a problem with it?
00:23:25.500 Nope.
00:23:26.540 Unanimous.
00:23:28.120 I mean
00:23:28.400 it's almost like
00:23:29.100 the Republicans
00:23:29.680 are trying
00:23:31.380 to lose
00:23:31.980 this next election.
00:23:35.000 Does anybody
00:23:35.640 disagree with me
00:23:36.600 with this basic fact
00:23:37.740 that strategically
00:23:38.640 the smartest thing
00:23:40.060 the Republicans
00:23:40.720 could have done
00:23:41.520 given that she's
00:23:42.820 going to get
00:23:43.160 on the court
00:23:44.480 anyway
00:23:44.860 and it doesn't
00:23:46.140 change anything?
00:23:47.700 Wasn't the smartest
00:23:48.520 thing to try
00:23:50.040 to get a
00:23:50.460 unanimous vote?
00:23:54.200 Now
00:23:54.640 people disagree
00:23:55.760 but give me a reason
00:23:57.060 in the disagreement.
00:23:59.900 Right?
00:24:00.740 It makes no difference
00:24:02.320 because you're not
00:24:03.840 fighting back
00:24:04.480 is that why?
00:24:04.960 Dems will never
00:24:08.800 reciprocate?
00:24:10.100 It's not that
00:24:11.060 you're asking
00:24:11.500 the Democrats
00:24:12.160 to reciprocate
00:24:12.960 so let me be
00:24:13.560 more clear.
00:24:14.840 I do not believe
00:24:16.020 that Democrats
00:24:17.620 would reciprocate
00:24:18.700 and that's not
00:24:19.460 important to my
00:24:20.140 point.
00:24:21.380 Do you get that?
00:24:22.680 There would be
00:24:23.360 pressure on
00:24:24.380 Democrats
00:24:24.920 from the media
00:24:26.020 if the Republicans
00:24:27.880 had just done
00:24:29.020 100% agreement
00:24:30.240 on a candidate.
00:24:31.540 I'm just saying
00:24:32.180 the media would
00:24:32.840 put pressure
00:24:33.340 on the Democrats.
00:24:34.100 I'm not saying
00:24:34.480 the Democrats
00:24:35.020 would want to
00:24:35.680 and so it would
00:24:37.280 make the Democrats
00:24:37.920 look bad
00:24:38.580 would it not?
00:24:39.900 Don't Republicans
00:24:40.840 like that?
00:24:42.180 Don't you think
00:24:42.720 the Republicans
00:24:43.420 would want to go
00:24:44.240 into an election
00:24:44.860 and say look
00:24:45.480 when they give us
00:24:46.780 a qualified
00:24:47.540 candidate
00:24:48.080 is there any
00:24:50.040 do you see
00:24:50.760 any racism?
00:24:51.800 No you don't.
00:24:53.080 All we wanted
00:24:53.800 was a qualified
00:24:54.500 candidate.
00:24:55.680 It would be
00:24:56.440 easy to say that
00:24:57.440 and they would
00:24:58.680 get all the
00:24:59.240 political benefits
00:25:00.040 of saying it.
00:25:02.560 I don't know
00:25:02.900 to me
00:25:03.440 this is a
00:25:03.940 no brainer.
00:25:05.780 I mean
00:25:05.980 this is the
00:25:07.280 simplest
00:25:07.760 persuasion
00:25:08.660 question
00:25:09.460 you'll ever
00:25:10.400 see.
00:25:11.100 This one's
00:25:11.500 really easy.
00:25:13.680 So if you're
00:25:14.340 thinking in terms
00:25:14.980 of tit for tat
00:25:16.080 that has nothing
00:25:16.900 to do with
00:25:17.360 the suggestion.
00:25:18.500 I'm definitely
00:25:19.100 not suggesting
00:25:19.840 that Democrats
00:25:21.040 will play nice
00:25:21.920 if you play nice
00:25:22.720 because there's
00:25:23.120 no playing nice
00:25:23.900 in the idea.
00:25:25.240 In fact you're
00:25:25.720 not playing nice.
00:25:27.080 You're playing
00:25:27.600 as let's say
00:25:29.700 as schemingly
00:25:30.760 as you could.
00:25:33.560 Sorry about
00:25:34.100 the word.
00:25:35.120 But it would
00:25:35.940 be the most
00:25:36.540 let's say
00:25:37.680 manipulative
00:25:38.860 clever thing
00:25:41.100 to do.
00:25:41.480 It wouldn't
00:25:41.740 be kind
00:25:42.220 at all.
00:25:43.220 It would
00:25:43.540 just be
00:25:43.880 putting pressure
00:25:44.520 on the
00:25:44.960 Democrats.
00:25:45.300 That's all
00:25:46.180 it would do.
00:25:47.180 And otherwise
00:25:47.520 everything's
00:25:48.100 going to be
00:25:48.360 the same
00:25:48.820 because she's
00:25:49.260 going to get
00:25:49.620 nominated anyway.
00:25:51.480 So to me
00:25:51.940 this is easy.
00:25:52.600 There are
00:25:55.160 very few
00:25:56.800 issues
00:25:57.420 that are
00:25:58.480 this cleanly
00:25:59.460 obvious
00:26:00.680 what is the
00:26:01.200 right thing
00:26:01.560 to do.
00:26:02.160 And the
00:26:02.740 Republicans
00:26:03.140 have chosen
00:26:03.680 the wrong
00:26:04.040 thing to do.
00:26:04.760 I don't
00:26:05.000 know why.
00:26:08.040 Well
00:26:08.520 I'm starting
00:26:09.800 to think
00:26:10.280 that some
00:26:10.760 of the news
00:26:11.380 is not
00:26:11.860 exactly
00:26:12.460 accurate.
00:26:13.800 Is anybody
00:26:14.540 having that
00:26:15.060 feeling?
00:26:16.240 Hey
00:26:16.640 I'm starting
00:26:17.540 to think
00:26:18.020 that this
00:26:18.440 news
00:26:18.880 isn't 100%
00:26:19.920 accurate
00:26:20.320 all the
00:26:20.680 time.
00:26:21.080 So I
00:26:23.340 saw a tweet
00:26:23.880 where they
00:26:24.300 claimed that
00:26:24.840 seven generals
00:26:26.360 had been killed
00:26:27.000 by the
00:26:27.320 Ukrainians.
00:26:28.040 Seven Russian
00:26:28.620 generals.
00:26:29.900 I heard
00:26:30.440 Petraeus say
00:26:31.120 that three
00:26:31.660 were confirmed
00:26:32.520 and I saw
00:26:34.420 a tweet
00:26:34.640 by Ian
00:26:35.140 Miles
00:26:35.620 saying that
00:26:37.100 half of that
00:26:37.640 list of
00:26:38.040 I think
00:26:38.280 there were
00:26:38.500 seven
00:26:38.780 are fake.
00:26:42.180 That sounds
00:26:42.940 about right.
00:26:44.720 You know
00:26:45.300 I do believe
00:26:46.100 that maybe
00:26:46.640 three generals
00:26:47.520 got killed
00:26:48.120 but if you
00:26:48.900 see a list
00:26:49.440 that lists
00:26:49.880 seven of them
00:26:50.500 that would
00:26:52.620 be hard
00:26:53.020 to believe
00:26:53.520 and I'm
00:26:54.360 not sure
00:26:54.760 you should
00:26:55.140 believe that.
00:26:57.360 All right.
00:26:59.200 Let me ask
00:27:00.020 you this.
00:27:01.900 If you
00:27:02.560 listen to
00:27:03.060 the fake
00:27:03.440 news and
00:27:03.900 then you
00:27:04.180 believe it
00:27:04.760 and then
00:27:06.200 just by
00:27:06.640 coincidence
00:27:07.100 you watch
00:27:07.860 that movie
00:27:08.360 The Matrix
00:27:08.920 right afterwards
00:27:09.820 does your
00:27:12.080 mind make
00:27:12.660 the connection?
00:27:14.640 In other
00:27:14.920 words
00:27:15.200 does anybody
00:27:17.000 realize
00:27:17.680 that they're
00:27:19.920 in a
00:27:20.300 simulated
00:27:20.720 reality
00:27:21.360 even without
00:27:22.780 the simulation?
00:27:24.160 So forget
00:27:24.540 about simulation
00:27:25.180 theory where
00:27:26.020 I'm saying
00:27:26.420 we're all
00:27:26.800 software.
00:27:27.500 Forget about
00:27:28.020 that.
00:27:28.960 Just imagine
00:27:29.540 this is a real
00:27:30.220 world.
00:27:30.740 It's the only
00:27:31.160 one.
00:27:32.120 You know
00:27:32.300 just sort of
00:27:32.780 standard
00:27:33.120 classic reality.
00:27:34.640 Even in our
00:27:35.240 classic reality
00:27:36.160 the citizens
00:27:37.840 are walking
00:27:38.380 around in this
00:27:39.180 illusion about
00:27:40.000 the world.
00:27:41.300 Both sides.
00:27:42.540 You know
00:27:42.680 I don't
00:27:42.920 think that
00:27:43.360 the right
00:27:44.360 has it all
00:27:44.920 right and
00:27:45.400 the left
00:27:45.700 has it all
00:27:46.120 wrong or
00:27:46.520 anything like
00:27:46.940 that.
00:27:47.420 I think
00:27:47.760 everybody's in
00:27:48.260 a different
00:27:48.560 movie and
00:27:49.040 none of the
00:27:49.380 movies are
00:27:49.760 real or
00:27:50.960 not completely
00:27:52.020 real.
00:27:53.160 All of the
00:27:53.700 movies have
00:27:54.260 real, as far
00:27:55.860 as anything
00:27:56.200 can be real
00:27:56.780 I guess, or
00:27:57.540 at least
00:27:57.740 verifiable facts
00:27:58.900 in them.
00:27:59.780 They're just
00:28:00.340 not completely
00:28:01.460 verifiable.
00:28:03.240 So we
00:28:06.160 definitely live
00:28:07.400 in, effectively
00:28:08.440 we are in
00:28:09.380 the simulation
00:28:10.000 because we
00:28:12.000 believe the
00:28:12.600 fake news.
00:28:14.660 Am I
00:28:15.320 making that
00:28:15.780 case enough?
00:28:16.780 If you
00:28:17.200 believe the
00:28:17.680 fake news
00:28:18.280 you're walking
00:28:19.360 around in a
00:28:20.100 simulated movie
00:28:21.740 that isn't
00:28:22.580 based on
00:28:23.040 reality.
00:28:25.060 Who believes
00:28:25.920 the fake
00:28:26.260 news?
00:28:26.600 Well we
00:28:26.860 all did
00:28:27.160 six years
00:28:27.640 ago.
00:28:28.620 Or we
00:28:29.360 were more
00:28:29.720 likely to
00:28:30.220 believe it
00:28:30.520 six years
00:28:30.980 ago.
00:28:31.620 Trump
00:28:31.900 changed
00:28:32.280 everything.
00:28:33.440 As I
00:28:33.840 predicted.
00:28:37.180 Ian told
00:28:37.960 me today
00:28:38.500 on Twitter
00:28:41.920 Twitter that
00:28:42.260 I don't
00:28:42.560 take enough
00:28:42.980 credit for
00:28:44.540 my, I
00:28:45.700 think it
00:28:45.920 was 2015
00:28:46.700 prediction that
00:28:47.680 Trump would
00:28:48.200 change not
00:28:48.760 just politics
00:28:49.500 but he
00:28:50.420 would change
00:28:50.820 the entire
00:28:51.340 way we
00:28:51.760 see reality.
00:28:53.480 That actually
00:28:54.240 happened.
00:28:56.020 That actually
00:28:56.640 happened.
00:28:57.780 Now imagine a
00:28:59.200 more unusual
00:29:00.820 prediction than
00:29:02.300 that.
00:29:02.500 That was a
00:29:02.800 pretty unusual
00:29:03.260 prediction.
00:29:03.660 So there's a
00:29:08.300 Russian critic,
00:29:09.200 this guy
00:29:09.500 Alexei Navalny,
00:29:10.800 so he's been
00:29:11.160 a critic of
00:29:11.900 Russia for
00:29:12.320 years.
00:29:13.580 They tried to
00:29:14.720 poison him
00:29:15.220 once but he
00:29:16.040 survived,
00:29:17.700 allegedly
00:29:18.300 poisoned.
00:29:20.300 He was
00:29:20.860 convicted of
00:29:21.500 fraud that
00:29:22.280 was probably
00:29:22.720 trumped up
00:29:23.420 charge, 2.5
00:29:25.780 years.
00:29:26.620 Now I guess
00:29:27.080 the first one
00:29:27.540 was contempt
00:29:28.160 to court and
00:29:29.320 then they just
00:29:29.760 gave him a
00:29:30.140 nine year
00:29:30.520 sentence for
00:29:31.200 fraud which I'm
00:29:32.380 sure is not
00:29:33.220 real either.
00:29:34.360 Or even if it
00:29:35.000 is real it's
00:29:35.520 not the reason
00:29:36.040 he's going to
00:29:36.600 jail.
00:29:37.340 So the reason
00:29:37.860 is he's a
00:29:38.340 critic.
00:29:39.480 And it's
00:29:41.540 such a weird
00:29:42.260 situation to
00:29:44.060 see a human
00:29:44.720 being being
00:29:45.420 tortured in
00:29:46.100 public.
00:29:48.400 I mean he
00:29:48.760 was literally
00:29:49.240 poisoned,
00:29:50.240 almost died,
00:29:51.440 came back,
00:29:52.860 and now he's
00:29:53.480 being jailed
00:29:54.320 repeatedly for
00:29:55.960 probably BS.
00:29:58.080 And he's
00:30:00.620 actually just
00:30:01.100 being tortured
00:30:01.660 in public by
00:30:02.680 Putin.
00:30:03.220 Why are we
00:30:05.580 okay with
00:30:05.980 that?
00:30:10.440 I'm looking
00:30:11.080 at this
00:30:11.400 comment.
00:30:12.320 Scott turns
00:30:13.000 to Trump
00:30:13.560 to bait
00:30:14.080 us, then
00:30:15.020 turns to his
00:30:15.740 handlers with
00:30:16.440 H, handlers
00:30:17.440 talking points,
00:30:18.800 snake in the
00:30:19.400 grass.
00:30:20.580 All right,
00:30:21.080 Kazmin
00:30:21.920 Senti, you
00:30:24.500 have the
00:30:25.860 floor.
00:30:27.840 You believe
00:30:28.600 that I have
00:30:29.080 a handler.
00:30:30.980 Who is my
00:30:31.740 handler?
00:30:34.020 Anybody want
00:30:35.000 to take a
00:30:35.440 shot at
00:30:35.880 that?
00:30:37.220 Is it
00:30:37.860 part of the
00:30:38.360 new world
00:30:39.200 order?
00:30:42.000 Is it
00:30:42.460 a globalist?
00:30:45.600 Could it be a
00:30:46.460 globalist?
00:30:49.140 Who is it?
00:30:52.100 Okay.
00:30:52.700 Yes.
00:30:54.020 I got a
00:30:55.520 correct answer
00:30:56.100 on the
00:30:56.640 locals platform.
00:30:59.820 When it
00:31:00.420 said who my
00:31:00.900 handler is and
00:31:01.720 who my boss
00:31:02.580 is, somebody
00:31:03.960 correctly had
00:31:04.860 the answer,
00:31:05.840 my penis.
00:31:07.060 That is the
00:31:07.720 correct answer.
00:31:08.940 It's the only
00:31:09.400 thing I listen
00:31:09.940 to.
00:31:10.860 Everything else
00:31:11.500 is just a
00:31:12.020 suggestion.
00:31:12.800 You know what
00:31:13.040 I mean?
00:31:14.180 My stomach
00:31:14.740 says it's
00:31:15.220 hungry.
00:31:15.640 I say,
00:31:15.940 well, that's
00:31:16.180 just a
00:31:16.520 suggestion.
00:31:17.920 My brain
00:31:18.520 says it's
00:31:19.000 bored.
00:31:19.380 I think,
00:31:19.680 well, that's
00:31:20.000 just a
00:31:20.360 suggestion.
00:31:21.580 But when my
00:31:22.160 penis says it's
00:31:22.940 time for
00:31:23.260 action, it's
00:31:25.120 go time.
00:31:26.000 That's not a
00:31:26.680 suggestion.
00:31:27.860 That's an
00:31:28.400 order.
00:31:29.360 And I think
00:31:30.000 you all know
00:31:30.400 it.
00:31:32.880 All right.
00:31:34.760 I don't know
00:31:35.400 what all that
00:31:35.860 was about.
00:31:39.440 Let me make
00:31:40.520 a suggestion
00:31:40.960 for a peace
00:31:41.780 deal for
00:31:42.260 Ukraine.
00:31:43.300 The saddest
00:31:44.060 thing I've
00:31:44.480 seen today is
00:31:45.280 that President
00:31:45.940 Zelensky of
00:31:46.900 Ukraine apparently
00:31:48.820 said he's
00:31:49.240 would consider
00:31:49.900 a peace
00:31:50.380 deal in
00:31:51.460 which Ukraine
00:31:52.120 would say
00:31:53.140 they wouldn't
00:31:53.780 join NATO
00:31:54.680 ever in
00:31:56.400 exchange for
00:31:57.000 a ceasefire
00:31:57.620 and the
00:31:58.240 withdrawal of
00:31:58.780 Russian troops
00:31:59.420 and some
00:32:00.540 security guarantees.
00:32:02.220 To which I
00:32:03.120 say, oh, so
00:32:05.020 this wonderful
00:32:05.960 Zelensky guy,
00:32:07.920 who is a
00:32:08.700 hero, he's a
00:32:10.180 hero, he
00:32:11.480 destroyed his
00:32:12.280 whole fucking
00:32:12.920 country to
00:32:14.600 get a deal
00:32:15.200 that was on
00:32:15.740 the table
00:32:16.260 before the
00:32:17.860 war.
00:32:18.140 is that
00:32:20.320 really
00:32:20.540 happening?
00:32:22.640 Is
00:32:22.960 Zelensky
00:32:23.460 literally, did
00:32:25.340 he literally
00:32:25.880 destroy his
00:32:26.620 whole country
00:32:27.300 to negotiate
00:32:29.600 for the deal
00:32:30.280 that was the
00:32:30.740 original deal?
00:32:33.120 Am I
00:32:34.000 rating it
00:32:34.440 wrong?
00:32:36.680 What the
00:32:38.900 fuck is
00:32:42.780 happening?
00:32:43.140 All right,
00:32:45.040 well, let me
00:32:45.920 suggest how a
00:32:46.720 deal could be
00:32:47.260 made or at
00:32:47.940 least framed so
00:32:49.640 that it puts the
00:32:50.440 pressure on
00:32:51.000 Russia.
00:32:51.840 And it goes
00:32:52.520 like this.
00:32:53.700 If you limit
00:32:54.840 the deal to
00:32:55.960 just stuff about
00:32:57.100 Ukraine, you're
00:32:58.880 an idiot.
00:32:59.960 Meaning whoever
00:33:00.800 negotiates the
00:33:01.660 deal, if they
00:33:02.800 limit to what
00:33:03.820 they're negotiating
00:33:04.620 to be about
00:33:05.920 Ukraine, stupid.
00:33:08.000 this should be
00:33:11.000 about the
00:33:11.360 entire Russian
00:33:12.660 military and
00:33:13.760 ours and
00:33:14.500 NATO.
00:33:15.560 We should be
00:33:16.300 looking at the
00:33:16.860 Ukraine thing as
00:33:18.040 the genesis for
00:33:19.860 a larger
00:33:20.500 conversation about
00:33:21.660 how never to be in
00:33:22.560 this situation
00:33:23.140 again.
00:33:24.900 We should say to
00:33:26.080 Russia, do you
00:33:27.280 need a land
00:33:27.860 bridge?
00:33:28.840 We can make
00:33:29.420 that happen.
00:33:30.520 Because we're
00:33:31.220 not really opposed
00:33:32.240 to transportation,
00:33:33.780 are we?
00:33:35.100 Are we opposed
00:33:36.120 to transportation?
00:33:38.220 How about
00:33:38.820 their pipelines?
00:33:40.800 Are we opposed
00:33:41.820 to pipelines?
00:33:42.920 Well, not really
00:33:43.540 in concept.
00:33:44.940 How about we
00:33:45.540 make some kind
00:33:46.240 of a deal to
00:33:47.800 guarantee
00:33:48.300 transportation,
00:33:49.640 that they can
00:33:50.800 reach the stuff
00:33:51.500 they want to
00:33:51.940 reach, that
00:33:53.240 they've got some
00:33:53.840 control over
00:33:54.540 their Russian
00:33:55.240 speaking people
00:33:56.020 who may in
00:33:57.620 fact have been
00:33:58.620 shelled by
00:33:59.880 Ukrainians?
00:34:02.420 I mean, does
00:34:02.880 the rest of the
00:34:03.400 world care about
00:34:04.060 that?
00:34:04.420 Not really.
00:34:06.120 How in the
00:34:06.800 world can't we
00:34:07.480 make a deal
00:34:07.960 with Russia?
00:34:08.580 The way to
00:34:09.160 not make a
00:34:09.760 deal is to
00:34:10.560 limit the
00:34:10.960 conversation to
00:34:11.860 Ukraine-only
00:34:12.960 stuff.
00:34:14.220 We should be
00:34:14.940 saying to
00:34:15.340 Russia, how
00:34:17.120 about never
00:34:17.860 having offensive
00:34:18.640 forces anywhere
00:34:19.500 near the border
00:34:21.060 with another
00:34:21.600 country?
00:34:22.220 Just no
00:34:22.680 offensive forces.
00:34:24.080 And the
00:34:24.480 moment you put
00:34:25.040 any offensive
00:34:25.700 capability, we're
00:34:28.020 going to change
00:34:28.900 everything.
00:34:30.280 But as long
00:34:31.120 as you don't
00:34:31.460 have any invasion
00:34:32.960 looking forces on
00:34:34.400 the border, we
00:34:35.880 won't make
00:34:37.500 anybody else
00:34:38.180 NATO.
00:34:39.080 For example,
00:34:40.440 let's say as
00:34:41.280 long as Russia
00:34:42.080 never puts an
00:34:43.620 offensive force on
00:34:44.760 anybody else's
00:34:45.560 border, that
00:34:47.580 NATO will not
00:34:50.620 take in any new
00:34:51.580 countries, because
00:34:53.260 that's provocative,
00:34:54.360 and won't put
00:34:55.260 offensive military
00:34:56.380 stuff on their
00:34:58.440 border as well.
00:34:59.080 Do you think we
00:35:00.260 can't make a
00:35:00.800 deal?
00:35:02.540 And then you
00:35:03.640 add economic
00:35:05.040 incentives, and
00:35:06.040 you say, look, not
00:35:06.920 only would we drop
00:35:07.720 the sanctions, but
00:35:09.140 maybe we could help
00:35:09.840 you build some
00:35:10.460 other industry.
00:35:13.440 Operation
00:35:13.880 Gladio, I don't
00:35:15.060 know what that
00:35:15.420 is, but somebody
00:35:17.360 paid 20 bucks to
00:35:18.640 ask me to explain
00:35:19.740 the thing I never
00:35:20.360 heard of.
00:35:21.400 But thank you for
00:35:22.600 the $20, of
00:35:25.280 which YouTube gets
00:35:26.820 a third, and then
00:35:27.480 I pay half of it in
00:35:28.380 taxes.
00:35:34.500 Oh, give us a sign
00:35:36.120 you're really the
00:35:36.700 one in charge of the
00:35:37.540 globalist movement by
00:35:39.520 making Klaus Schwab do
00:35:40.860 something recognizably
00:35:42.020 significant next time
00:35:43.400 he's on TV.
00:35:46.240 Challenge accepted.
00:35:47.700 The next time you see
00:35:48.680 Klaus Schwab, watch
00:35:50.480 him touch his nose
00:35:53.140 when he's talking.
00:35:57.160 Right?
00:35:57.340 If you see him touch
00:35:59.560 his nose, that's his
00:36:01.360 signal that I
00:36:03.200 control him.
00:36:05.720 Okay?
00:36:06.760 So there you go.
00:36:08.160 You'll probably be
00:36:08.860 seeing that pretty soon.
00:36:13.840 Any chance Putin is
00:36:15.300 the good guy?
00:36:16.640 Nope.
00:36:17.080 I don't think so.
00:36:20.580 But let me put some
00:36:21.760 context on that.
00:36:22.880 I think this is the case
00:36:24.520 of two bad guys.
00:36:26.280 The bad guys being
00:36:27.460 Ukraine and the
00:36:28.180 United States being
00:36:29.680 basically assholes.
00:36:32.780 And Putin being evil.
00:36:35.780 So if you're rooting for
00:36:36.980 the assholes over the
00:36:38.460 evil, I guess that
00:36:40.060 makes sense.
00:36:41.360 I mean, asshole is not
00:36:42.720 nearly as bad as
00:36:43.680 totally evil, I guess.
00:36:45.020 But I don't have even
00:36:48.300 the slightest belief that
00:36:49.820 we're not guilty of
00:36:51.780 some bad shit, meaning
00:36:53.800 provoking and creating
00:36:55.540 this situation.
00:36:56.560 To me, that looks like
00:36:57.520 it's on the United
00:36:58.140 States.
00:37:00.340 Anybody disagree?
00:37:02.260 Is there anybody...
00:37:03.600 Now, I'm not
00:37:04.200 excusing Putin.
00:37:05.820 You know, Putin is
00:37:07.120 definitely...
00:37:09.020 He's got some evil shit
00:37:10.120 going on there.
00:37:10.700 But that doesn't mean
00:37:12.680 that the other side
00:37:13.420 is the good guys.
00:37:14.460 There's no white hat
00:37:15.180 black hat thing going
00:37:16.220 on here.
00:37:16.880 There's two black hats
00:37:18.060 fighting for control.
00:37:21.560 And I have to admit,
00:37:24.260 I'm not super invested
00:37:25.720 in the outcome
00:37:26.680 as long as I get my
00:37:28.900 wheat.
00:37:30.560 And nobody nukes me.
00:37:32.760 I don't really care.
00:37:34.340 Because, I don't know,
00:37:37.020 I'm just not invested.
00:37:38.460 It's beyond how
00:37:40.720 it affects us.
00:37:42.340 All right.
00:37:42.980 It makes me think...
00:37:44.680 So here's the thing.
00:37:46.800 What's the thing?
00:37:47.700 Here's the thing.
00:37:48.980 The thing is
00:37:49.980 that when you see
00:37:52.240 our negotiators
00:37:53.220 apparently not being
00:37:54.480 serious,
00:37:56.060 because I don't think
00:37:56.780 we've even engaged
00:37:58.180 in a way that makes
00:37:58.920 us look like we're
00:37:59.600 serious,
00:38:00.500 is the real goal
00:38:01.760 to just degrade
00:38:03.280 Russia's economy
00:38:04.160 for as long as we can.
00:38:06.340 Because the longer
00:38:07.040 we degrade their
00:38:07.900 economy,
00:38:08.600 the longer it takes
00:38:10.160 them to build up
00:38:10.860 good military.
00:38:12.820 I feel as if
00:38:13.980 none of this
00:38:14.700 is about peace.
00:38:16.920 I feel as if
00:38:17.920 this has always
00:38:18.540 been about
00:38:19.160 some way to
00:38:20.460 permanently degrade
00:38:21.660 Russia,
00:38:22.680 especially in a
00:38:23.500 military sense.
00:38:25.460 What do you think?
00:38:26.960 Or, you know,
00:38:27.460 somebody says
00:38:27.920 just lining their
00:38:28.640 pockets.
00:38:29.360 So another frame
00:38:30.620 would be
00:38:31.080 the only people
00:38:32.300 who want this
00:38:32.880 are the ones
00:38:33.380 who are going
00:38:33.620 to make money
00:38:34.060 on it.
00:38:34.540 And they have
00:38:35.040 enough power
00:38:35.480 to influence
00:38:35.960 everything else.
00:38:36.920 That could be.
00:38:38.460 In fact,
00:38:39.640 maybe that's
00:38:40.180 the top frame
00:38:42.140 here.
00:38:46.420 All right.
00:38:49.720 Rasmussen
00:38:50.220 had a poll
00:38:51.300 and they said,
00:38:52.100 are electric cars
00:38:52.840 practical for most
00:38:54.040 drivers?
00:38:55.720 What do you think?
00:38:56.740 Are electric cars
00:38:58.100 practical for most
00:38:59.360 drivers?
00:38:59.980 So you're not
00:39:00.460 answering for
00:39:01.000 yourself.
00:39:02.120 You're saying
00:39:02.540 most drivers.
00:39:05.520 Yeah, it depends
00:39:06.540 how you interpret
00:39:07.180 the question,
00:39:07.840 right?
00:39:09.160 Because I interpret
00:39:10.200 practical as also
00:39:11.840 the low-cost
00:39:13.260 alternative.
00:39:14.720 And I don't think
00:39:15.560 it's the low-cost
00:39:16.340 alternative,
00:39:16.920 even with higher
00:39:17.640 gas prices,
00:39:18.760 because we assume
00:39:19.560 gas will go down
00:39:20.320 at some point.
00:39:23.400 So I'm not sure
00:39:24.740 that the poll
00:39:25.400 was capturing
00:39:26.080 people's opinions
00:39:27.260 so much as how
00:39:28.040 they interpreted
00:39:28.640 the question.
00:39:29.880 But 52% said no.
00:39:32.400 Electric cars are
00:39:33.320 not practical
00:39:34.000 for most drivers.
00:39:35.840 And I would guess
00:39:36.880 that that 52%
00:39:38.120 are not totally
00:39:39.700 up-to-date.
00:39:41.940 Because I don't
00:39:43.120 know if you have
00:39:43.600 an electric car,
00:39:44.520 but there are
00:39:45.160 charging stations.
00:39:47.200 And there is a
00:39:47.800 convenience factor
00:39:48.700 of not going to
00:39:49.580 a regular gas station.
00:39:51.060 I mean, if you
00:39:51.440 charge it at home,
00:39:52.300 you're probably
00:39:52.680 doing all the
00:39:53.160 driving you need
00:39:53.820 without a
00:39:54.420 charging station.
00:39:56.020 And so I wonder
00:39:57.600 if Elon Musk
00:39:58.440 needs to do
00:39:58.900 a little more
00:39:59.400 work, you know,
00:40:01.680 he can't
00:40:02.100 immediately change
00:40:02.860 the fact that
00:40:03.520 electric cars,
00:40:04.800 at least a Tesla,
00:40:05.680 comes with a
00:40:06.280 price premium.
00:40:07.980 But I think
00:40:10.300 the public is
00:40:11.600 behind the
00:40:12.620 technology.
00:40:14.800 Would you
00:40:15.400 agree with that?
00:40:16.380 If more than
00:40:17.360 half of the public
00:40:18.220 thinks electric cars
00:40:19.340 are not practical,
00:40:20.840 now forget about
00:40:21.480 climate change or
00:40:22.320 anything else,
00:40:22.800 that's a separate
00:40:23.300 conversation,
00:40:24.120 just the car
00:40:24.840 itself as a tool.
00:40:25.860 half the people
00:40:27.840 think it's
00:40:28.220 impractical.
00:40:30.000 That feels like
00:40:30.920 they're just
00:40:31.240 behind, right,
00:40:32.340 in knowledge.
00:40:34.960 Wouldn't you
00:40:35.540 say?
00:40:39.240 All right, I'm
00:40:39.880 getting a lot of
00:40:40.380 disagreements, so
00:40:41.220 people are not...
00:40:42.700 So I guess a lot
00:40:43.360 of you think that
00:40:43.920 electric cars are
00:40:44.920 inconvenient.
00:40:47.640 Based on what?
00:40:49.000 What would make
00:40:49.660 them impractical
00:40:50.500 besides cost?
00:40:51.660 Yeah, okay, if
00:40:54.720 you're saying
00:40:55.020 stuff like lithium
00:40:55.940 or you can't
00:40:56.740 recycle the
00:40:57.340 batteries and
00:40:57.920 stuff like that,
00:40:58.460 that's not
00:40:58.780 exactly on point
00:41:00.140 because you
00:41:01.740 don't worry about
00:41:02.340 recycling any of
00:41:03.560 your cars.
00:41:04.280 You just drive
00:41:05.180 them and then
00:41:05.640 sell them to
00:41:06.140 somebody else.
00:41:08.120 Somebody says
00:41:08.780 no charging
00:41:09.360 stations.
00:41:09.920 Well, it
00:41:10.240 depends where
00:41:10.640 you are, right?
00:41:12.080 So if you're in
00:41:12.700 California, there
00:41:13.520 are plenty of
00:41:14.040 charging stations.
00:41:15.020 If you're in
00:41:15.500 somewhere else,
00:41:16.420 maybe not.
00:41:17.920 Yeah.
00:41:18.640 Do you think
00:41:19.040 52% of the
00:41:20.060 country lives
00:41:20.700 somewhere where
00:41:21.360 they don't
00:41:21.720 have easy
00:41:23.600 access to
00:41:24.240 charging stations?
00:41:26.400 Actually, that's
00:41:27.080 probably true,
00:41:27.660 isn't it?
00:41:28.540 Even more than
00:41:29.180 that, maybe?
00:41:30.680 So I'm going
00:41:31.460 to say if
00:41:31.920 access to
00:41:33.000 charging stations
00:41:33.820 was your
00:41:34.840 main thing and
00:41:37.280 you answered
00:41:37.560 the question,
00:41:38.480 that would be
00:41:38.900 a good answer.
00:41:40.340 Yeah.
00:41:40.620 I think depending
00:41:41.440 on where you
00:41:41.900 live, I can see
00:41:42.520 half of the
00:41:42.940 country living
00:41:43.500 where they
00:41:43.840 don't have
00:41:44.180 many charging
00:41:44.740 stations.
00:41:46.280 Would you
00:41:46.620 buy that?
00:41:47.520 Would you
00:41:47.980 buy that half
00:41:48.740 of the country
00:41:49.320 lives where
00:41:50.680 there aren't
00:41:51.120 enough charging
00:41:52.200 stations yet?
00:41:53.040 Because they're
00:41:53.400 probably just
00:41:53.820 in metropolitan
00:41:54.380 areas.
00:41:56.340 Yeah.
00:41:56.640 Okay.
00:41:57.940 Kid Rock had
00:41:58.840 some interesting
00:41:59.400 things to say.
00:42:01.580 I guess Tucker
00:42:02.620 Carlson interviewed
00:42:03.340 him.
00:42:04.120 And he claims
00:42:05.160 that when he
00:42:05.580 was hanging out
00:42:06.100 with Trump,
00:42:07.580 that Trump
00:42:08.000 said, quote,
00:42:09.840 what do you
00:42:10.400 think we should
00:42:10.880 do about North
00:42:11.520 Korea?
00:42:12.780 And Kid Rock
00:42:13.780 said, allegedly,
00:42:15.300 he said, I'm
00:42:15.800 like, what?
00:42:16.860 I don't think I'm
00:42:17.620 qualified to answer
00:42:18.400 this.
00:42:21.760 And then
00:42:22.440 the story
00:42:24.280 says some
00:42:24.820 people online
00:42:25.540 are questioning
00:42:27.060 whether that
00:42:27.780 conversation even
00:42:29.040 happened.
00:42:29.400 Let me give you
00:42:30.860 some insight.
00:42:33.180 You know,
00:42:33.480 because I spent
00:42:34.060 some time with
00:42:34.700 Trump in the
00:42:36.440 White House,
00:42:37.480 just sort of
00:42:38.200 chatting.
00:42:40.180 That's definitely
00:42:41.120 something Trump
00:42:41.860 would do.
00:42:42.280 If you asked
00:42:44.560 me to bet
00:42:45.240 on whether
00:42:46.300 Kid Rock is
00:42:47.280 telling this
00:42:47.780 accurately,
00:42:48.760 oh yeah,
00:42:49.160 I'd bet on
00:42:49.540 Kid Rock.
00:42:50.580 I'd bet
00:42:50.960 totally.
00:42:51.860 Because I had
00:42:52.680 the same
00:42:53.020 experience,
00:42:53.980 not about
00:42:54.460 North Korea.
00:42:55.800 But Trump
00:42:56.320 actually asked
00:42:56.940 my opinion
00:42:57.480 about something.
00:42:59.520 And I think
00:43:00.480 you don't
00:43:02.640 understand how
00:43:03.680 gifted Trump
00:43:04.900 is with his
00:43:06.820 interpersonal
00:43:07.400 skills.
00:43:09.240 You have to
00:43:09.880 understand how
00:43:10.480 gifted he is.
00:43:11.220 he's really
00:43:12.040 gifted.
00:43:13.840 One-on-one,
00:43:14.880 just working
00:43:15.360 people and
00:43:15.940 stuff.
00:43:16.780 So if you're
00:43:17.640 meeting the
00:43:18.060 President of
00:43:18.600 the United
00:43:18.920 States, and
00:43:20.420 the President
00:43:20.880 of the United
00:43:21.240 States says
00:43:21.820 to you,
00:43:22.340 regular citizen,
00:43:23.560 what do you
00:43:24.160 think I should
00:43:24.560 do about
00:43:24.860 North Korea?
00:43:26.860 What's it
00:43:27.440 do to you?
00:43:29.060 You fall in
00:43:30.060 love with
00:43:30.500 him.
00:43:31.520 That's what
00:43:32.120 happens.
00:43:33.420 Trump doesn't
00:43:34.500 just make
00:43:35.680 you like
00:43:37.440 him.
00:43:38.440 He makes
00:43:39.240 you fall in
00:43:39.880 love with
00:43:40.280 him.
00:43:40.440 male or
00:43:41.340 female,
00:43:42.800 old or
00:43:43.280 young,
00:43:44.060 black or
00:43:44.480 white.
00:43:45.520 He makes
00:43:46.000 you fall in
00:43:46.540 love with
00:43:46.920 him.
00:43:47.860 When he
00:43:48.340 stands in
00:43:48.740 the Oval
00:43:49.120 Office,
00:43:49.580 the most
00:43:49.840 important
00:43:50.200 person in
00:43:50.620 the world,
00:43:51.340 and says
00:43:51.800 to Kid
00:43:52.220 Rock,
00:43:52.700 what do you
00:43:53.280 think we
00:43:53.600 should do
00:43:53.880 about North
00:43:54.380 Korea?
00:43:55.540 Do you
00:43:55.780 think he
00:43:56.060 was looking
00:43:56.440 for a
00:43:56.780 strategy?
00:43:57.980 No,
00:43:58.240 he wasn't
00:43:58.600 looking for
00:43:59.000 a strategy.
00:44:00.380 I don't
00:44:00.960 think so.
00:44:02.100 I think
00:44:02.540 he was doing
00:44:03.980 something that
00:44:04.620 was insanely
00:44:05.480 cool for
00:44:07.320 Kid Rock.
00:44:07.920 he was
00:44:09.120 giving Kid
00:44:09.620 Rock an
00:44:10.000 experience.
00:44:11.960 And it
00:44:12.440 was cool.
00:44:13.900 Do you
00:44:14.120 think Kid
00:44:14.560 Rock didn't
00:44:15.320 love that?
00:44:16.940 I mean,
00:44:17.560 it's funny
00:44:18.480 that he
00:44:18.800 said,
00:44:19.140 I don't
00:44:19.340 think I'm
00:44:19.680 qualified to
00:44:20.280 answer that.
00:44:22.420 In fact,
00:44:23.160 it makes me
00:44:23.600 want to elect
00:44:24.480 Kid Rock for
00:44:25.320 president next.
00:44:26.960 The fact that
00:44:27.620 Kid Rock knows
00:44:28.380 he's not
00:44:28.760 qualified to
00:44:29.480 answer the
00:44:29.820 question on
00:44:30.280 North Korea
00:44:30.800 just makes me
00:44:31.800 like him
00:44:32.240 more.
00:44:32.480 I was
00:44:33.240 like,
00:44:33.420 OK,
00:44:33.820 I like
00:44:34.740 that.
00:44:35.700 Because I'm
00:44:36.280 not sure I
00:44:36.740 would have
00:44:37.000 answered the
00:44:37.460 same way.
00:44:39.700 I probably
00:44:40.420 would have
00:44:40.720 given an
00:44:41.160 opinion.
00:44:44.580 So I'd
00:44:45.540 say Kid
00:44:45.940 Rock's
00:44:46.340 credibility
00:44:46.980 went way
00:44:47.560 up with
00:44:47.960 me.
00:44:48.720 And if I
00:44:49.120 had to
00:44:49.380 bet on
00:44:49.780 it,
00:44:49.960 I would
00:44:50.200 say 99.99%
00:44:52.700 this conversation
00:44:53.760 happened just
00:44:54.400 the way he
00:44:55.120 recounted it.
00:44:56.260 That would
00:44:56.820 be so
00:44:57.400 exactly what
00:44:58.120 Trump would
00:44:58.500 do.
00:44:58.680 All right.
00:45:02.480 That is
00:45:04.680 by far
00:45:05.060 my favorite
00:45:05.640 story of
00:45:06.160 the day.
00:45:07.760 How many
00:45:08.320 of you
00:45:08.480 believe that
00:45:09.060 there's a
00:45:09.600 new world
00:45:10.340 order?
00:45:11.380 I guess
00:45:11.700 Biden used
00:45:14.060 that term,
00:45:14.860 new world
00:45:15.300 order,
00:45:15.860 in a speech.
00:45:17.440 And how
00:45:18.260 many of you
00:45:18.700 even know
00:45:19.160 what that
00:45:19.500 refers to?
00:45:20.560 Because there's
00:45:20.960 a current,
00:45:22.400 what Wikipedia
00:45:23.120 calls a
00:45:24.060 conspiracy
00:45:24.540 theory about
00:45:25.880 the new
00:45:26.340 world order.
00:45:28.080 In the
00:45:28.420 comments,
00:45:29.140 how many of
00:45:29.640 you believe
00:45:30.140 that there's
00:45:30.700 a new world
00:45:31.220 order?
00:45:31.560 And I'll
00:45:31.740 give you
00:45:31.960 the definition
00:45:32.460 from
00:45:32.880 Wikipedia.
00:45:36.660 Let's see.
00:45:37.400 A new
00:45:37.660 world order
00:45:38.300 is a
00:45:40.200 conspiracy
00:45:40.640 theory about
00:45:41.540 a new
00:45:41.880 world order
00:45:42.420 that is a
00:45:43.480 secretive
00:45:44.020 power elite
00:45:44.980 with a
00:45:45.880 globalist
00:45:46.540 agenda.
00:45:47.540 So do you
00:45:48.280 believe that
00:45:48.740 there's a
00:45:49.200 power elite
00:45:50.200 secretive?
00:45:51.820 You might
00:45:52.480 know where
00:45:52.740 they are,
00:45:53.060 but they're
00:45:53.280 secretive,
00:45:54.300 with a
00:45:55.000 globalist
00:45:55.600 agenda.
00:45:59.200 And some
00:46:00.120 of you say
00:46:00.660 it's not a
00:46:01.440 secret.
00:46:01.640 It's code,
00:46:03.960 Scott.
00:46:04.940 It's code.
00:46:06.880 Well,
00:46:08.480 here's what
00:46:10.020 I think.
00:46:11.860 Hasn't there
00:46:12.560 always been a
00:46:13.620 global elite
00:46:14.560 trying to
00:46:16.320 move the
00:46:17.240 world in
00:46:17.740 their favor?
00:46:19.840 That's always
00:46:20.500 been the case,
00:46:21.100 hasn't it?
00:46:21.980 What changed?
00:46:24.020 Did something
00:46:24.720 change?
00:46:25.160 Now, let
00:46:28.780 me ask you
00:46:29.260 this.
00:46:30.920 I've told
00:46:31.560 you that I've
00:46:32.180 spent some
00:46:32.820 time behind
00:46:33.380 the curtain.
00:46:34.900 And by that
00:46:35.320 I mean seeing
00:46:36.420 how things
00:46:36.820 actually work
00:46:37.520 in politics
00:46:38.100 and how the
00:46:39.020 news is
00:46:39.580 generated from
00:46:41.520 absolutely
00:46:41.980 nothing.
00:46:42.280 So I've
00:46:43.540 spent enough
00:46:44.000 time behind
00:46:44.560 the curtain
00:46:45.080 that I have
00:46:46.040 a very strong
00:46:46.820 opinion about
00:46:48.460 whether there's
00:46:49.180 a global
00:46:49.760 elite,
00:46:51.860 like an
00:46:52.960 Illuminati or
00:46:53.740 something running
00:46:54.300 the world.
00:46:55.420 And the
00:46:55.820 answer is no.
00:46:57.800 There are
00:46:58.900 lots of them.
00:47:00.520 There's not
00:47:01.060 one global
00:47:02.020 elite.
00:47:03.300 There are
00:47:04.140 bunches of
00:47:04.680 them.
00:47:05.420 And they all
00:47:06.040 have their
00:47:06.360 own agenda.
00:47:07.400 They all have
00:47:07.840 their own
00:47:08.100 opinions.
00:47:08.700 And they're
00:47:08.900 all maximizing
00:47:09.820 their own
00:47:10.340 life,
00:47:11.720 basically.
00:47:12.920 And I
00:47:14.560 would say
00:47:14.880 that it's
00:47:15.280 more accurate
00:47:16.640 to say that
00:47:17.340 there are
00:47:17.620 elite,
00:47:18.840 rich elites
00:47:19.620 for each
00:47:20.480 topic.
00:47:21.700 It's not as
00:47:22.320 if there's
00:47:22.680 one group of
00:47:23.420 elite people
00:47:24.000 who is
00:47:24.720 trying to
00:47:25.100 affect all
00:47:25.640 the topics.
00:47:27.040 That definitely
00:47:27.720 doesn't happen.
00:47:29.220 There's nothing
00:47:29.720 like that.
00:47:30.680 But there
00:47:31.040 definitely are
00:47:32.060 secret billionaire
00:47:33.320 collections of
00:47:34.940 people working
00:47:35.840 behind the
00:47:36.380 scenes to get
00:47:37.300 what they want.
00:47:38.060 That's very
00:47:38.660 true.
00:47:39.220 I can confirm
00:47:39.920 that for sure.
00:47:41.560 So I'm not
00:47:45.240 sure that you
00:47:45.760 need to add
00:47:46.320 the concept of
00:47:47.060 a new world
00:47:47.620 order.
00:47:48.840 Meaning that I
00:47:49.940 don't know if it
00:47:50.480 adds anything to
00:47:51.340 what you already
00:47:51.840 knew.
00:47:52.120 You already
00:47:53.800 knew that the
00:47:54.500 elites tried to
00:47:55.220 make things
00:47:55.900 work out in
00:47:56.600 their favor.
00:47:58.460 Let me ask
00:47:59.040 you this.
00:47:59.500 Is your
00:47:59.880 assumption about
00:48:00.560 the new world
00:48:01.160 order that it
00:48:02.580 would be better
00:48:03.220 for the power
00:48:03.940 elites or are
00:48:05.080 they trying to
00:48:05.580 do something
00:48:06.240 altruistically
00:48:07.880 that they think
00:48:09.000 would be better
00:48:09.540 for the world?
00:48:11.420 What do you
00:48:11.820 think?
00:48:12.480 If you believe
00:48:13.280 the conspiracy
00:48:13.840 theory, I'll
00:48:15.200 call it a
00:48:15.780 conspiracy theory
00:48:16.580 because Wikipedia
00:48:17.160 does.
00:48:18.120 If you follow
00:48:18.920 the new
00:48:19.820 world order
00:48:20.340 idea, what
00:48:24.620 are they
00:48:24.860 doing?
00:48:26.640 Is it good
00:48:27.520 for the
00:48:27.900 elites or is
00:48:28.500 it good for
00:48:28.920 the public
00:48:29.800 and they're
00:48:30.140 just trying
00:48:30.460 to do us
00:48:30.860 a favor?
00:48:32.040 Somebody says
00:48:32.740 they're trying
00:48:33.100 to consolidate
00:48:33.760 power.
00:48:35.540 Now that
00:48:35.940 would be
00:48:36.380 consolidate
00:48:36.940 power meaning
00:48:37.620 that there
00:48:37.980 would be
00:48:38.240 organizations
00:48:39.000 that could
00:48:40.300 control things
00:48:41.080 in multiple
00:48:41.580 countries,
00:48:42.180 right?
00:48:42.360 I don't
00:48:44.940 see that
00:48:45.340 happening.
00:48:46.360 What
00:48:46.720 countries are
00:48:47.340 giving up
00:48:47.760 their
00:48:47.940 sovereignty
00:48:48.420 to the
00:48:49.220 new world
00:48:49.640 order?
00:48:51.720 It seems
00:48:52.420 to me that
00:48:52.840 we go on
00:48:53.340 a case-by-case
00:48:54.140 basis.
00:48:58.720 All right.
00:49:00.400 Clapper
00:49:00.880 calls it the
00:49:01.540 consensus
00:49:02.020 community.
00:49:02.920 Okay.
00:49:07.580 New world
00:49:08.320 order is,
00:49:09.700 let's see,
00:49:10.220 malevolent
00:49:12.360 attentions.
00:49:14.480 Yeah,
00:49:14.680 don't they
00:49:15.000 have conflicting
00:49:15.800 interests?
00:49:16.280 That's right.
00:49:17.360 So the
00:49:18.380 other thing
00:49:18.720 you have to
00:49:19.080 realize is
00:49:19.600 that the
00:49:20.040 global elites
00:49:21.080 don't all
00:49:21.620 want the
00:49:22.020 same thing.
00:49:23.440 Some want
00:49:23.840 climate change,
00:49:24.860 maybe they've
00:49:25.440 invested in
00:49:26.060 solar panels.
00:49:27.160 Some want
00:49:27.820 more regular
00:49:29.720 energy production,
00:49:31.460 maybe they own
00:49:32.280 oil companies.
00:49:33.580 So the
00:49:34.200 elites are not
00:49:34.800 all on the
00:49:35.140 same team.
00:49:36.220 They're all
00:49:36.740 working for
00:49:37.320 themselves and
00:49:38.060 they're on
00:49:38.500 every team.
00:49:40.220 somebody says
00:49:41.480 concentration of
00:49:42.560 wealth is the
00:49:43.460 goal.
00:49:45.640 No, it
00:49:46.300 isn't.
00:49:47.520 Who has
00:49:48.240 that goal?
00:49:49.200 Who has a
00:49:49.880 goal of
00:49:50.240 concentrating
00:49:50.800 wealth?
00:49:51.680 I've never
00:49:51.980 even heard of
00:49:52.380 that.
00:49:53.320 I've heard of
00:49:53.940 the opposite.
00:49:55.600 I've heard of
00:49:56.080 people trying to
00:49:56.740 get richer,
00:49:57.940 of course.
00:50:00.060 So that's
00:50:01.040 nothing new.
00:50:02.360 I don't know.
00:50:03.720 I just see
00:50:04.500 nothing new
00:50:05.100 here.
00:50:05.340 Anyway, when
00:50:07.000 Biden used the
00:50:08.060 phrase new
00:50:08.640 world order,
00:50:09.280 you should
00:50:09.880 know in
00:50:10.400 context,
00:50:11.640 this is also
00:50:12.480 according to
00:50:13.180 Wikipedia.
00:50:14.240 During the
00:50:14.580 20th century,
00:50:15.360 political figures
00:50:16.260 such as
00:50:16.780 Woodrow Wilson
00:50:17.420 and Winston
00:50:18.140 Churchill used
00:50:19.540 the term
00:50:20.000 new world
00:50:20.620 order to
00:50:21.080 refer to a
00:50:21.580 new period
00:50:21.960 of history
00:50:22.440 characterized
00:50:23.380 by a
00:50:24.000 dramatic
00:50:24.260 change and
00:50:25.280 often follows
00:50:26.060 a war.
00:50:26.440 And I
00:50:28.400 think Biden
00:50:29.340 was just
00:50:29.720 using it
00:50:30.120 generically.
00:50:32.040 I think
00:50:32.620 Biden's age
00:50:33.620 especially
00:50:34.220 connects him
00:50:35.620 to a time
00:50:36.180 when new
00:50:36.660 world order
00:50:37.200 was a
00:50:38.120 political
00:50:38.440 thing to
00:50:38.900 say that
00:50:39.320 didn't
00:50:39.520 mean what
00:50:39.860 it means
00:50:40.120 now.
00:50:40.940 It wasn't
00:50:41.260 a conspiracy
00:50:42.060 there.
00:50:43.640 All right,
00:50:43.880 how about
00:50:44.100 this one?
00:50:44.480 The fourth
00:50:44.940 turning.
00:50:46.300 How many
00:50:46.620 of you are
00:50:47.140 believers in,
00:50:48.580 I guess Steve
00:50:49.160 Bannon's a big
00:50:49.820 promoter of
00:50:50.360 this.
00:50:50.920 There's a
00:50:51.260 book by that
00:50:51.920 name.
00:50:52.760 How many
00:50:53.080 believe there's
00:50:53.860 an 80-year-old
00:50:54.800 natural cycle
00:50:55.800 in the world
00:50:57.000 in which
00:50:58.400 different
00:50:59.020 generations
00:50:59.620 act
00:51:00.180 differently
00:51:00.880 depending on
00:51:01.760 what situation
00:51:03.020 they're born
00:51:03.480 into and
00:51:04.740 that the
00:51:05.100 80-year
00:51:06.060 series
00:51:08.060 is repeated
00:51:09.240 and predictable.
00:51:11.700 How many
00:51:12.260 buy that
00:51:12.880 that is
00:51:13.380 telling you
00:51:13.820 something
00:51:14.080 useful
00:51:14.620 and
00:51:15.780 predictable?
00:51:16.780 The predictable
00:51:17.420 part is the
00:51:18.180 important part.
00:51:19.000 It's easy
00:51:19.480 to fit
00:51:20.040 the history
00:51:22.080 to any
00:51:22.460 pattern.
00:51:23.260 Do you all
00:51:23.600 know that?
00:51:24.400 You could
00:51:24.900 come up with
00:51:25.380 any kind
00:51:25.780 of weird
00:51:26.180 way to
00:51:27.080 interpret
00:51:27.400 things and
00:51:28.500 history usually
00:51:29.420 bears it out.
00:51:30.940 But it's
00:51:31.400 useless if it
00:51:32.160 can't
00:51:32.520 predict.
00:51:34.120 So hind
00:51:34.640 casting is
00:51:35.340 easy.
00:51:36.300 But then
00:51:36.580 saying,
00:51:36.980 okay,
00:51:37.180 if now we
00:51:37.660 understand the
00:51:38.300 world,
00:51:38.600 we can
00:51:38.860 predict what
00:51:39.400 will happen.
00:51:39.840 But they
00:51:40.060 can't do
00:51:40.340 the predicting
00:51:40.820 part,
00:51:41.840 which means
00:51:42.320 that the
00:51:42.600 hind casting
00:51:43.100 wasn't
00:51:43.480 especially
00:51:44.020 useful.
00:51:46.960 All right.
00:51:48.460 Somebody says
00:51:49.160 read Generations,
00:51:50.280 the history of
00:51:50.820 American future.
00:51:51.500 The same
00:51:51.820 authors,
00:51:52.260 right,
00:51:52.560 as the
00:51:53.060 fourth turning.
00:51:54.980 But here's
00:51:56.200 my take.
00:51:56.980 So I did
00:51:57.460 a shallow
00:51:58.880 dive on this.
00:52:01.360 According to
00:52:01.900 my shallow
00:52:02.400 dive, I
00:52:03.180 would say
00:52:03.480 the 80
00:52:04.200 year cycle
00:52:05.000 is closer
00:52:08.180 to astrology
00:52:08.980 than anything
00:52:09.800 to worry
00:52:10.260 about.
00:52:12.120 Because I
00:52:12.900 think it
00:52:13.240 comes down
00:52:13.760 to civilization
00:52:16.300 goes through
00:52:18.560 periods of
00:52:19.240 lots of
00:52:19.680 change,
00:52:20.700 and that
00:52:21.440 war is
00:52:21.980 often part
00:52:22.480 of that.
00:52:26.900 I mean,
00:52:28.240 I'm not
00:52:28.880 sure this
00:52:29.320 is adding
00:52:29.740 anything.
00:52:30.140 because it's
00:52:31.700 not predictive
00:52:32.280 at all.
00:52:33.820 If you tell
00:52:34.440 me that the
00:52:35.060 fourth turning
00:52:35.800 can predict,
00:52:37.580 I tell you
00:52:38.380 anybody can
00:52:39.780 predict.
00:52:41.200 Sometime in
00:52:41.860 the next 20
00:52:42.400 years,
00:52:43.060 it'll be like
00:52:43.580 a big upheaval.
00:52:45.640 What do you
00:52:46.300 think?
00:52:47.960 Do you think
00:52:48.440 I got it
00:52:48.840 right?
00:52:50.420 Yeah,
00:52:50.980 probably.
00:52:51.280 All right.
00:52:58.240 That brings
00:52:58.940 us to the
00:53:00.560 conclusion of
00:53:01.480 the best
00:53:02.600 live stream
00:53:03.400 there ever
00:53:04.220 has been.
00:53:05.620 And if you
00:53:06.420 would like
00:53:06.760 to enjoy
00:53:09.580 this extra,
00:53:11.200 I'm going to
00:53:11.820 give you a
00:53:12.300 little something
00:53:12.800 extra here at
00:53:13.420 the end that
00:53:15.020 will only work
00:53:15.740 for 20% of
00:53:16.760 you.
00:53:18.240 That's roughly
00:53:19.040 the number of
00:53:19.640 people this
00:53:20.060 will work
00:53:20.480 for.
00:53:21.620 In a moment,
00:53:23.140 I'm going to
00:53:23.520 tell you that
00:53:24.040 your day is
00:53:24.640 going to be
00:53:24.940 awesome.
00:53:26.540 And then I'm
00:53:27.000 going to snap
00:53:28.260 my fingers,
00:53:29.760 and it will
00:53:30.540 become true.
00:53:32.380 Now, for 20%
00:53:33.460 of you, this
00:53:34.260 will actually
00:53:34.620 work, because
00:53:36.000 that's about how
00:53:36.880 many people are
00:53:37.460 easily persuadable.
00:53:39.880 So simply
00:53:40.620 having me tell
00:53:41.280 you that today
00:53:41.880 is going to
00:53:42.240 be great will
00:53:44.660 actually make
00:53:45.240 it happen.
00:53:46.080 At least in
00:53:46.600 your subjective
00:53:47.260 movie that runs
00:53:49.080 in your head,
00:53:50.100 your problems
00:53:50.720 might be
00:53:51.100 exactly the
00:53:51.660 same.
00:53:51.940 You might not
00:53:52.720 solve any
00:53:53.240 problems.
00:53:54.740 But if you
00:53:55.360 believe, then
00:53:58.460 it will happen
00:53:59.340 for 25% of
00:54:01.140 you.
00:54:01.780 And so,
00:54:02.580 YouTube, you're
00:54:04.540 going to have a
00:54:04.860 great day today.
00:54:08.620 Enjoy.
00:54:09.060 Enjoy.
00:54:09.200 Enjoy.
00:54:09.260 Enjoy.
00:54:09.280 Enjoy.
00:54:09.300 Enjoy.
00:54:09.320 Enjoy.
00:54:09.340 Enjoy.
00:54:09.360 Enjoy.
00:54:09.380 Enjoy.
00:54:11.380 Enjoy.
00:54:13.260 Enjoy.
00:54:15.900 Enjoy.
00:54:16.040 Enjoy.
00:54:37.800 Enjoy.
00:54:40.860 Enjoy.