Episode 1710 Scott Adams： Start Your Week Off Right With The Simultaneous Sip & Weird Headline Views
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
146.8711
Summary
Dopamine is the thing that makes everything better, and it's also the most important thing you can do to get your brain juiced up. In this episode of the podcast, we talk about how you can increase your dopamine by using a simple technique called "the simultaneous sip" and how it can be used to get you up and running.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Good morning, everybody, and I am delighted to see all of you, especially you, and you,
00:00:08.840
and you. You know who you are. And while you're here, how would you like to get your dopamine
00:00:17.120
just raging? That's why we're here. And a little bit of oxytocin, a little bit. But
00:00:25.640
we'll jack up your dopamine a good 20%, get you going for the day. And all you need is
00:00:31.940
a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stein, a canteen, a glass, a vessel of any
00:00:36.780
kind, fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled
00:00:43.880
pleasure. It's the dopamine of the day. It's the thing that makes everything better. It's
00:00:48.080
called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go.
00:00:51.080
Oh. Here's your persuasion tip of the day, if you didn't already know this. When you
00:01:04.400
associate something that people like, a pleasure that's a known pleasure, with some other thought
00:01:11.580
or stimulation, you can take some of the goodness from the thing you like, and it gets transferred
00:01:18.620
over to the thing you associate with, as long as it's sort of a fresh thing that people haven't
00:01:24.400
thought too much about and have too much baggage with. And you can use that to extend people's
00:01:32.820
enjoyment from things they already enjoy to entirely new things. How cool is that? You
00:01:39.040
can actually make people enjoy things that they'd never considered enjoying before, just
00:01:43.840
by association. Happens with songs. You hear a song that reminds you of something. Still
00:01:50.240
to this day, when I hear, there's a song by Traffic. The, I can't remember which one it
00:01:58.120
is, but it was played before all college soccer games at my alma mater, Hartwick College, which
00:02:06.120
one of the years I was there was the number one soccer power in the country, which is weird
00:02:10.880
because it was a tiny little school, but it won the whole country one year that I was
00:02:16.540
there. And so the soccer was this big event, and they would play the same song before each
00:02:22.020
game, and you'd be so charged up in a variety of ways, if you know what I mean, because it
00:02:28.680
was college after all. And it would be so fun to be there that that song, even if I hear
00:02:33.480
it today, years later, you get just an immediate dopamine hit. So use that, use that technique to
00:02:41.740
extend the things you like. Rasmussen had a poll asking people, is it illegal, is illegal
00:02:48.940
immigration getting worse? So Rasmussen asked that poll, and 55% said, yes, illegal immigration is
00:02:57.940
getting worse. 27% said no. No. No. No. No. No, no, no, no, no. It's not getting worse. 27%.
00:03:09.320
27. That's about a quarter of the people who responded, about a quarter. A quarter is, well,
00:03:16.780
if you were to round it off, that's roughly 25%, which means absolutely nothing to the people
00:03:24.640
who have never seen this live stream before. But if you've been here before, you know how
00:03:30.260
funny this is right now. Because 25% is roughly the number of people who get every poll question
00:03:36.460
wrong. It doesn't matter how easy the question is. Question, is oxygen good for humans? 64% said
00:03:48.480
yes. 26% said no. No. No. People don't need oxygen. No. Oh, no. Well, meanwhile, in censorship
00:04:01.660
news, Juanita Broderick had her account locked on Twitter. For what they say is misinformation
00:04:10.800
about COVID. Here is what she tweeted, and you be the judge. Is this misinformation or fact?
00:04:20.980
She tweeted, when will this vaccine crap be over? Big Pharma has, Big Pharma has profited enough
00:04:28.320
for the next 100 years. Stop pushing vaccines that don't work and, oh, here comes the, here comes the bad
00:04:35.380
part. Alter DNA, she posted on Saturday. Alter DNA. Womp, womp, womp, womp, womp, womp. Cannot say
00:04:45.360
alter DNA. Womp, womp, womp, womp. Alert, alert, alert. Censorship. Code of silence.
00:04:53.760
Juanita has been neutralized. Has been neutralized. Now, to be clear, I don't think the vaccinations
00:05:01.280
alter your DNA. I don't think that's true. But separately, was it a good idea for her to be censored?
00:05:13.460
That's really the question. Yeah, you could argue whether she's right or wrong, I suppose, and I don't
00:05:19.320
think she's right. I don't think so. But how would I know, really? What exactly would be my qualifications
00:05:28.120
for answering that question? I don't know. Seems like the news seems pretty convinced it's not
00:05:33.380
altering your DNA, but how would I know, really? So I wonder if there isn't a better way to handle
00:05:43.720
something like this. For example, if the altering the DNA part was the offending part, could you alter
00:05:50.580
the Twitter interface to simply flag the part that mainstream experts disagree with? Would that
00:06:02.040
be offensive to you? Would you consider that a violation of free speech if Twitter simply had
00:06:08.360
a policy of, instead of banning people, now remember, you're going to compare it to banning
00:06:13.240
people, and not necessarily for every person who says everything that's wrong, but just people
00:06:19.120
who are bannable in that bannable range, would you be okay with the bannable part simply
00:06:26.480
connecting to a source? Maybe not a fact checker. I don't know, because we don't trust the fact
00:06:32.660
checkers, right? But I feel like there's a better way to handle it. In other censorship
00:06:39.640
news, Jack Posobiec apparently got locked out of his Twitter account for a while, but he seems
00:06:46.240
to be back. And correct me if I'm wrong, is it because he called Disney groomers because
00:06:54.280
of their, what is it, the opposition to the new law about what to teach young kids about
00:07:01.080
sexuality, or sexual preference or something? I don't know. I just can't get interested in
00:07:06.620
the story. I hate it. I know you are, right? Well, let me ask you. Let me ask you this.
00:07:12.800
How many of you are, like, really interested in this Florida law story? Is it interesting
00:07:19.420
to you? I see mostly not. Okay, well, I see yeses. Maybe it depends if you have kids who
00:07:31.480
are in that relevant age group. All right, so it's a mixture. But probably more no's than
00:07:36.960
yeses, although I suppose I could have gotten this on any topic, right? It's only the fascinating
00:07:41.660
way I cover it that makes it so, so salient. Yeah, I feel there isn't just, there's just
00:07:51.520
not enough to say about it. Like, we know what some people want. We know what the criticism
00:07:57.160
is. They're going to fight it out. I don't know. It just doesn't seem like there's anything
00:08:02.280
there. Anything there that makes it worthy for yet another person to be talking about
00:08:07.680
it. Certainly it matters to the people involved. So I don't want to minimize, let me not minimize
00:08:13.060
the importance to the people involved. It's certainly important to the people who care
00:08:19.500
about such things, and maybe they should. But there isn't much depth to the story is what
00:08:25.020
I'm saying. Somebody says, one thing Scott will never do, and that is condemn a pedophile.
00:08:32.740
Would anybody like to see me do that? It's a challenge. I've been challenged. Will I condemn
00:08:40.200
a pedophile? Are you wondering if I'm going to bail out and not condemn a pedophile? Okay,
00:08:50.920
I condemn pedophiles. Totally. Are you okay with that? Now, here's the part where I get
00:09:02.780
banned from all social media, if not society itself. I also don't believe in free will.
00:09:11.300
Sorry. So, you have to condemn people who are, you know, doing things that are bad for society
00:09:18.340
and especially bad for kids. So there's no hesitation about what's right for society.
00:09:24.760
Right? For society? Yeah. You've got to condemn the hell out of anybody who's hurting anybody.
00:09:31.200
Most people agree with that. But on a philosophical level, I kind of see everybody as equal.
00:09:39.760
Sorry. Not legally, and not practically. In a practical sense, you just can't treat everybody
00:09:45.940
the same. You have to treat certain behaviors completely differently than other behaviors.
00:09:50.500
Of course. But when I walk into a room and see a bunch of miscreants and ne'er-do-wells
00:09:57.140
and non-standard people, basically a pirate ship of humanity, I don't walk into that room
00:10:03.580
and say, well, you suck. You suck. You're an asshole. You're bad. You're unworthy.
00:10:08.460
That one I like. That one I like. That one I like. I don't do that. I walk in and I like
00:10:14.160
the whole pirate ship. I like the whole pirate ship. I have to condemn some of them for behaviors.
00:10:22.480
But I don't devalue people because I don't see free will the same way other people do.
00:10:29.620
So, certainly you can change people's behavior, maybe by condemning certain parts.
00:10:34.480
Maybe it reduces who does what. But I don't believe in, oh, judge not. Thank you. Thank
00:10:41.680
you. If you'd like to put it into Christian terms and let me invite you to do that. I'm
00:10:47.440
not a believer. But I like the framework. It's a handy framework. So, yeah. Who am I
00:10:54.720
to judge? That would be the better way to say. I don't put myself in the role of a judge.
00:11:00.300
But certainly you have to condemn certain behaviors for practical reasons. All right.
00:11:10.140
Here's my new red line. I was insulted on Twitter today. And while I think you should use the
00:11:18.240
blocking judiciously, somebody went a little too far today. And I just want to run it by
00:11:25.260
you, you know, because you're my advisors. So, as my advisors, did I go too far? Or is
00:11:31.440
this reasonable? I blocked somebody today who accused me in public. And people are going
00:11:37.200
to see this, right? Because it's like a permanent record. He actually accused me in public of
00:11:41.900
believing the news. Well, I blocked that motherfucker. Don't do that if you want to ever, ever, ever
00:11:55.380
see me again. I will be so gone. All right. So, the big interesting news is that Elon Musk has
00:12:05.740
declined the offer to have a board seat on Twitter. Isn't that interesting? Didn't we think that his
00:12:14.860
play was to get on the board and that he'd have some influence? Well, it turns out we all learned
00:12:20.560
something today, or you're about to learn it. Being on the board limits your options. Did you know that?
00:12:27.680
It limits your options if you're Elon Musk. It probably doesn't limit your options if you're just
00:12:34.760
a board member. Like, if you were important enough to be on the board, but maybe other people haven't
00:12:40.660
heard your name before, well, in that case, being on the board probably does give you more influence
00:12:45.760
over Twitter. But if you're Elon Musk, all it does is limit you. Because everybody's going to listen to
00:12:51.560
what you say, right? That's the key. Everyone's going to listen to what you say. So, once you have
00:12:57.580
that, being on the board just gives you limitations. It's a limit to what you can say about the company,
00:13:04.160
I'm pretty sure. I think there's some limits about how you can trash the company if you're on the board.
00:13:09.900
And I think there's a limit to how much stock you can own. Somebody said 15%. So, why would he put up
00:13:16.740
with limits when there's no upside? And I think to myself, I don't know if there's another person
00:13:23.680
in the world who would have played it this way. And it's right. I don't know anybody else who would
00:13:31.240
have played it exactly like this to earn a board seat and then turn it down because it was limiting.
00:13:39.100
Nobody else would do that. Even if they were in this position, I feel like they wouldn't have done
00:13:44.000
that. He consistently finds the thing that you're not supposed to do and then makes it work.
00:13:52.580
And that's why it's so fun to watch. Now, he continues to make marketing departments
00:13:58.000
completely irrelevant wherever he has ownership of a company because he just is so newsworthy
00:14:04.480
that really, has anybody not heard of Twitter? Have you not heard that there might be some changes
00:14:10.480
coming? I think you probably have heard it. But the marketing department didn't get it done.
00:14:20.840
So, I saw a tweet by a user named Tank. That's what he calls himself on Twitter. He tweets, he goes,
00:14:33.120
let me break this down for you. Elon becomes largest shareholder for free speech. Elon was told to play
00:14:40.080
nice and not speak freely. In other words, the entire reason he was doing it was to have, you know,
00:14:46.260
try to get free speech for himself and others. And joining the board would actually limit his free
00:14:52.400
speech, you know, in a commercial way, not in a government way. So, in a separate but related story,
00:15:01.760
there's a Twitter engineering manager. Now, what I don't know is how important a Twitter
00:15:08.640
engineering manager is. Are there lots of them? Because there are lots of subgroups,
00:15:14.500
so they all need a little manager. Or is this somebody who manages all the engineers? I don't know.
00:15:19.880
It'd be a pretty big difference. But somebody who is a Twitter engineering manager had been tweeting
00:15:28.280
some negative stuff about Elon being on the board and really hated it and, you know,
00:15:33.660
was digging up some old Elon Musk tweets to embarrass him. And I think this is telling you
00:15:39.300
everything, isn't it? It feels like that's everything.
00:15:43.500
I feel like knowing that there's an engineering manager in Twitter that really, really doesn't
00:15:52.380
like whatever it is that Elon Musk thinks he's going to do, I feel like now you know everything,
00:15:59.820
don't you? Now, it's only one person. So, you know, maybe I'm overgeneralizing here. But that's one
00:16:07.200
person who operated with impunity in the sense that that one person was, you know, not shy about putting
00:16:13.480
out the message he put out. I shouldn't say he, because I don't know the pronoun. But let's say
00:16:21.020
they put out. All right. Here's another funny tweet by First Words on Twitter at Unscripted Mike
00:16:31.380
says this. He said, Elon Musk recently built the largest factory in the world, in Texas, of course,
00:16:38.260
just launched the first all-private rocket to the International Space Station,
00:16:42.380
and will soon restore free speech to Twitter, the 21st century town square. Meanwhile, Biden
00:16:49.240
was speaking incoherently somewhere the whole time. And the funny thing about this tweet is
00:16:57.100
what makes it work is the last three unnecessary words. So here's a little tip for you. Generally
00:17:07.520
speaking, you want to remove unnecessary words from your communication, because they're unnecessary,
00:17:13.780
and they just get in the way. But an exception is humor, where sometimes the unnecessary words are,
00:17:21.560
I don't know exactly why they work. It's just something you have to A-B test in your head.
00:17:25.820
If I add these unnecessary words, is it better or worse? And I don't know why this is better.
00:17:29.660
But let me read the sentence again and see how important the whole time is, even though it's
00:17:35.860
unnecessary. Watch. Meanwhile, Biden was speaking incoherently somewhere the whole time. The whole
00:17:42.220
time. I don't know. That's what makes the tweet. Right. By the way, how often have you seen my blog
00:17:51.760
post on how to be the day you became a better writer? How many of you have seen that? Because it's
00:17:57.080
going around again. It's been going around. I think it gets passed around at least every month
00:18:04.420
or so for years. If you haven't seen it, the reason it gets passed around every month or so for years
00:18:12.460
is that when people read it, and it takes approximately less than two minutes, very short,
00:18:19.940
and it's basically the shortest writing lesson in the world with the most impact. So it was created to
00:18:26.000
be exactly that. The shortest writing with the most impact. So just Google if you want to see that
00:18:31.400
the day you became a better writer. The day you became a better writer. And with my name,
00:18:38.620
it'll pop right up. It's all over the place. Now, this is why I like this live stream.
00:18:44.840
Because some of you know what just happened, right? Some of you know what just happened.
00:18:49.700
And some of you don't, but you're going to find out. What just happened was the people who are
00:18:55.240
familiar with that little piece I just recommended are actually aware that it actually fundamentally
00:19:01.300
gave them a superpower. Like turned them from mediocre writers or good-ish writers into good writers
00:19:09.100
in two minutes. In two minutes. It really does that. That's why I put these little two to four
00:19:16.160
minute lessons on locals subscription platform. Because you can actually fundamentally change
00:19:22.100
somebody's effectiveness forever, forever, in two to four minutes. You just have to say the right
00:19:27.840
stuff. So the people who know that know that I just changed a whole bunch of lives just by
00:19:36.120
mentioning it. You know, maybe three of you will Google it. But the three of you who Google it and
00:19:42.260
read it are actually going to have different outcomes. It's that powerful. All right.
00:19:50.940
There's some more information about the importance of ventilation. And I would still love to know this
00:19:58.280
question. If we know that almost nobody gets COVID outdoors, and we know that for sure, right?
00:20:04.640
Has anybody ever gotten COVID in a well-ventilated place? And how well-ventilated does it need to be?
00:20:14.300
Because, you know, I talked during the pandemic, what if you just turn on your fans? What if you just
00:20:20.860
have fans on? Is that good enough? And we still don't know the answer to that. We might have had a
00:20:26.640
complete solution to the pandemic and overlooked it because it was too ordinary, which is make sure
00:20:33.080
there's a fan in every room. Now, the experts say you've got to have a window open. But I think
00:20:39.560
that's where they go wrong. Because if the window is open, it's going to be too cold, too hot. Then
00:20:45.260
there's a reason that people close windows, right? Bugs. So I really, really, really wonder if just
00:20:52.100
moving the air is enough to distribute the plumes. And we might have had a solution the whole time.
00:20:59.500
We might have. All right. Here's my solution to the whole LGBTQ. And I think they've added some
00:21:09.080
numbers or letters, maybe some numbers, too. And some letters recently. And this is a persuasion
00:21:15.880
recommendation. Now, I know many of you are on the, let's say, the social warrior side of
00:21:24.840
stop making a big fuss and giving all these rights to those LGBTQ activists and stuff like
00:21:33.360
that. This isn't going to be that. This is actually going to be legitimate advice for how the people
00:21:40.840
who would define themselves in that community could get maybe better results. Okay. And this is in the
00:21:48.820
form of a persuasion lesson. I'll just apply it to something that's in the news. Every time the LGBTQ
00:21:55.160
adds a new designation or a new flavor, I think they get further from their objective. And what I would
00:22:03.980
do is advise them to take a tip from what the gay activists did in the earlier days of gay rights.
00:22:14.080
Do you remember when gay was called homosexual?
00:22:19.700
And homosexual sounds almost like a disease if you're not well educated, right? It just sounds
00:22:24.940
like, wait, that word is way too big. There's a famous story, and maybe somebody can tell me if this
00:22:30.920
is real or it's just one of those stories you heard, that in the early days of the United States,
00:22:36.260
I don't know exactly what year, somebody was running for election and won the election in part by
00:22:42.200
labeling his opponent a, I think it was a flagrant heterosexual. And people were so undereducated
00:22:50.680
that when they heard that, they're like, whoa, a flagrant heterosexual? We can't have one of those
00:22:56.980
in office, you know, back in cowboy days or whatever the hell it was. I mean, it feels like it was a
00:23:02.700
Lincoln kind of an era thing. But can somebody tell me, did that really happen?
00:23:07.760
Yeah. So I don't know if that really happened, but it tells the story really well. So here's the
00:23:15.140
thing. When the gay rights people changed, you know, from homosexual and queer, although queer,
00:23:22.800
they sort of did the N-word thing and owned it, which was also a good technique. But gay,
00:23:28.780
who doesn't want to be gay? I mean, in the sense that it sounds happy, right? So just labeling it with a
00:23:37.100
word that people universally embrace before they think about it was kind of sort of awesome in
00:23:43.840
terms of persuasion. It's just one of the greatest persuasion plays of all times, in my opinion,
00:23:51.240
just one of the best. Although Black Lives Matter was very good. Again, we're separating whether you
00:23:56.680
like the politics of it from just the persuasion element of it, if we could, right? So what could
00:24:03.040
the LGBTQ and extra letters do to be more like friendlier sounding so they immediately get a positive
00:24:15.180
vibe before people think about the politics? And here's what I would suggest. Non-binary. Now,
00:24:27.400
correct me if I'm wrong, but non-binary, the way it's currently used, is more limited than including
00:24:33.740
all of LGBTQ, right? And it doesn't matter for my purposes. I'm saying to rebrand non-binary as the
00:24:42.880
only thing that captures everything that's not binary. Here's why. People like being non-binary.
00:24:51.560
If you say, you fit into one or two categories, I say, yeah, damn it. Well, I don't know if that
00:24:58.640
sounds so good for me. It feels like I'm a little bit limited in my thinking, doesn't it? Even if
00:25:04.220
you're completely hetero or you're completely, you know, if you're completely hetero, you're still
00:25:09.220
going to say, yeah, I'm completely hetero. But I don't know, I'd like to think that at least,
00:25:15.160
at least I had some flexibility, you know. And I also wonder if there aren't lots of people who
00:25:22.560
would brand themselves hetero, who in their private thoughts are thinking, well, I'm hetero-ish.
00:25:31.400
You know what I mean? Maybe the porn they look at isn't exactly matching their hetero,
00:25:38.180
you know what I mean? You know what I mean? There must be plenty of people who say, yeah,
00:25:42.240
for public consumption, I'm hetero. But, you know, privately, I'm a little bit non-binary.
00:25:48.940
Just a little bit. I see a lot of pushback, which is why I'm doing this. I mean, if it were
00:25:55.840
not provocative, would I do it? Really? If I were not provocative? That's what makes this
00:26:01.760
question fun. So with all respect to the LGBTQ community, which some of my favorite people
00:26:09.820
are members of, I think if you just said non-binary, maybe you'd get further. Or even
00:26:17.740
something better, if there's a word like gay that just puts a positive spin on it from the
00:26:22.780
start, and then you think about the politics. That's all. Just come up with a better label
00:26:27.540
than a bunch of alphabet letters. All right. Have you noticed that in our minds, at least,
00:26:35.980
there are certain patterns that keep repeating? And one of the reasons that movies and books and TV
00:26:42.740
shows work is that people like certain patterns of things. Like they like stories of good versus
00:26:50.300
evil. They like stories of redemption, right? There's a limited set of what we imagine are the stories
00:26:58.220
that we want to see. And I'm fascinated when I see parallels. For example, as I tweeted today,
00:27:06.220
if you're familiar with the Star Trek universe, this will work better if you have some familiarity
00:27:14.340
with that universe. But if NATO is the federation, and again, right, everybody gets to say their side
00:27:20.920
is the good guys. I get it. I get it. Right? If you're in Russia, NATO doesn't look like the
00:27:26.880
federation. But from our point of view, right, this is just subjective point of view. If NATO is
00:27:32.320
the federation, would Russia be the Klingons? And would China be the Romulans? Or would they be the
00:27:38.560
Ferengi? Ferengi? Or the Borg? They're a little bit the Borg, because they're trying to assimilate
00:27:44.920
the Uyghurs. But they're a little bit the Ferengi, because they're, you know, commerce,
00:27:50.480
sort of commerce first. And the Russians seem like the Klingons, because it feels like the
00:27:57.220
honor of their empire is what matters more than life itself. Yeah, the Ferengi are capitalists,
00:28:04.980
but they're merchants, right? So this all brings me to the most important question,
00:28:12.520
which is, when we look at this whole Russia-Ukraine war, what would Shatner do? And until we've
00:28:20.200
heard that, I don't think we understand the whole situation. But what would Captain Kirk
00:28:24.980
do? I was going to ask him, but I couldn't. His DMs are closed. All right. Here's my most
00:28:36.680
provocative take today. You're going to hate this one. In my opinion, it looks like Russia already
00:28:44.040
lost the war. But the news is not saying that. Like, I'm observing it, and what seems to me,
00:28:53.460
and I'll get to my cognitive bias and my confirmation bias. That's the point. We're going to that.
00:28:58.220
So you don't need to shout that you disagree with me yet, because your disagreement is the point of
00:29:04.840
this, right? I'm watching the news, and you're watching the news, but why do I see that Russia
00:29:10.280
already lost? But the news isn't reporting it. So there are two possibilities here, which are kind
00:29:17.320
the cool. Number one, I'm suffering from confirmation bias, because I, somewhat uniquely among experts and
00:29:29.460
probably most of you, said that Russia would actually be running into a buzzsaw, and it wouldn't
00:29:36.080
be easy, and that the modern technology that the Ukrainian army was likely to have access to,
00:29:42.340
because they're NATO and American sponsorship. They were likely to surprise Russia with an unusually
00:29:50.400
aggressive and effective tech-led response. I said their tanks would be in trouble, that drones would
00:29:58.140
be part of it. And so far, 100% of that seems true, right? But would you say that my... So I had the
00:30:06.720
incorrect prediction, 100% incorrect, that Russia knew what I knew, which is, this doesn't look easy,
00:30:15.280
but I guess they thought it was. Maybe they had bad information. So they went ahead and invaded.
00:30:20.920
So that part, I'm 100% wrong, just so you can hear me say when I'm wrong. But it looks to me like the
00:30:28.480
second part of that, that Russia would be surprised, happened. And that it's already happened. Because
00:30:36.560
it doesn't look like they really have a good shot at taking over the country in terms of owning the
00:30:41.300
capital, Kyiv. And now we see them doing something that looks, again, again, just to me it looks this
00:30:48.280
way. Not to you. I'm not suggesting you see it this way. I'm saying that my confirmation bias,
00:30:54.960
which makes me want to be right. See, I want to be right that Ukraine was more able to defend
00:31:03.140
itself than others thought. So I'm interpreting the situation to make myself right. And even though
00:31:10.600
I'm aware of it, I can't unsee it. Isn't that weird? Like, I'm completely aware that I'm the only one
00:31:18.560
seeing this. But there's a reason I'm the only one seeing it. Either, and here's the fun part,
00:31:26.740
either you're all right, and I'm experiencing confirmation bias, completely possible. I have
00:31:32.660
no way to know that that's not true. And it's actually quite likely. I put it in the solidly,
00:31:40.480
The other possibility is that most of you get your opinions from the news. Most people do. They
00:31:49.440
get their opinions from the news. It's very rare to have somebody who has an opinion that
00:31:53.460
disagrees with either the left or the right-leaning news. It's very, very odd, unusual. So you get your
00:32:00.680
opinions largely from the news. And the news told you, with all its experts, that Ukraine was going to
00:32:09.200
be conquered by Russia. Well, okay, not in two days. Well, it might take them a little longer.
00:32:15.240
But suddenly, Russia has withdrawn from the entire north to try to salvage whatever it can.
00:32:22.020
It doesn't even look like it's going to take Odessa. I mean, maybe it will. But at the moment,
00:32:27.700
it looks like it got stopped from taking Odessa, too, in the port. So am I experiencing cognitive
00:32:35.940
dissonance? Or is the entire mainstream media, including the left and the right? Because remember,
00:32:43.380
both the left and the right thought it was going to be an easy victory for Russia. And they were so
00:32:49.000
wrong, it looks to me, they were so wrong that they can't tell you that they were wrong. And that
00:32:57.480
the cognitive dissonance and the confirmation bias is 100% on the mainstream media side, who is now
00:33:04.760
brainwashed the rest of you into believing that something like a Russian victory is unfolding.
00:33:11.980
When the news they actually report, I just watched General Petraeus, you know, explain the situation
00:33:18.880
and the withdrawal from Kiev. If you just look at what he's reporting, it really looks like Russia
00:33:25.780
already lost. But you tell me. Let's take a vote. Tell me, am I experiencing confirmation bias?
00:33:38.280
And Russia will just roll on to victory. Yes or no? There's only one correct answer. The correct answer,
00:33:47.660
I just saw only one person said it. The correct answer is unknown. All right, you just separated
00:33:54.480
yourselves into the higher level of awareness and lower level. Here's what I'm not going to tell you
00:34:01.460
that I'm right about this. I can't tell you that I'm right. I can only tell you what it feels like.
00:34:08.340
Because if you're experiencing cognitive dissonance or confirmation bias, you're the one who doesn't
00:34:15.060
know. You're the one who doesn't know. So if it's me, I don't know. And even if you tell me, even if
00:34:22.100
every one of you told me I'm experiencing it, I'd still say, I don't think so. I don't think so. I got
00:34:27.700
reasons. I got good reasons. One person said unknown when I asked the question, who has cognitive
00:34:36.320
dissonance? The person who said unknown has the best level of awareness probably in the conversation.
00:34:47.380
The moment you realize that cognitive dissonance and confirmation can just as easily affect you,
00:34:53.560
that's when you see the machinery. That's when you see reality just, it opens its cover.
00:35:05.060
But you have to accept that it's happening to you. If you believe it only happens to the dumb people
00:35:12.000
on the other side, you'll never see the machinery. And then you will be the scenery. So you can be the
00:35:21.500
scenery or you can see the machinery. And if you think that you know who has cognitive dissonance
00:35:27.080
in this situation, it's your scenery. If you can accept that you don't know, as I do, I really don't
00:35:36.900
know if I'm right. I only know what it looks like. And I accept that. And that allows me to see the
00:35:43.720
machinery. Don't be the scenery. All right. And we heard more about this Ukrainian volunteer drone
00:35:54.480
unit. Bunch of nerds. I say that with love because I love technical people.
00:36:02.560
They've modified these little hobby-sized drones. And apparently they got credit for stopping the
00:36:08.340
convoy. I feel like they might be getting a little more attention than maybe their actual
00:36:13.740
contribution is. But do you wonder if maybe there isn't still some kind of secret drones over there
00:36:21.820
that we don't exactly know about? Maybe something that America or NATO has that's a little bit
00:36:29.360
stealthier or a little bit faster or, I don't know, maybe a little more autonomous, a little more
00:36:36.000
something? I don't know. And do you think that when this is over, we'll learn that there was some
00:36:46.480
technology in play that made a big difference that we hadn't heard of during the conflict? Maybe.
00:36:54.060
I don't know. It could be just that the, let's say the weaponization of drones in general is the
00:37:01.080
whole story or most of it. What do you think of the idea of calling Putin a war criminal?
00:37:10.060
Let me explain how war crimes are tried. It's very complicated. So try to, try to follow along.
00:37:19.580
This is, this is how you handle the war crimes. So you've got the International Criminal Court
00:37:23.840
located in Hague and is created by the Rome Statute. But some people are members, some aren't.
00:37:29.160
We've got the United Nations. They could do something and then the members could all agree
00:37:33.860
and it would give it a patina of credibility. But of course, Russia wouldn't go along with
00:37:38.460
it. So it doesn't really matter. So you've got a whole bunch of legal remedies and legal
00:37:42.360
approaches that all have the same, they all have the same characteristic. We don't fully
00:37:48.120
understand them and they're not going to make any difference whatsoever.
00:37:50.300
Um, because Putin isn't going to go to trial, right? And we're not going to capture him if he
00:38:00.380
leaves the country, are we? Really? I mean, I don't think so. Would we? Is somebody going to take
00:38:08.300
him into custody? I don't think so. But here's what's interesting. Can Putin ever travel again?
00:38:16.300
Right. Except to the few places where they're friendly. I feel like that Russia no longer has
00:38:24.920
a leader in any realistic way. Meaning that if the whole world decides you just can't even
00:38:32.400
come here, you can't even touch our territory, do you really have a leader? Because you kind
00:38:39.280
of want a leader who can go to the G8, the G20, you know, whatever is appropriate. You feel
00:38:43.820
like, you feel like your leader needs to show up, right? 90% of success is attendance.
00:38:52.440
And he can't attend. Right? Attendance is very important. And now they have an alleged leader
00:39:00.300
who can't attend in a practical way. Because he won't be invited or it might be too risky
00:39:05.800
to leave the country. So in a real sense, they've already lost their leader. I mean, it's like
00:39:12.960
he's a military commander now, but the country doesn't have a political leader because the
00:39:18.420
other countries that would need to treat him like a political leader are just not going
00:39:22.400
to do it. Because they have this credible allegations of war crimes. Now, I want to jump in here and
00:39:31.660
say, because every time I say something like Russia is committing war crimes, somebody who's
00:39:37.740
pro-Ukraine jumps in and says, Scott, Scott, Scott, why do you believe in the news and
00:39:43.200
the propaganda? Don't you know that the Ukrainians were shelling the Russians and the Donbass and
00:39:50.260
discriminating against them? To which I say, I don't really know that. No. But I don't need
00:39:57.460
to know it. Because if you're telling me that Ukrainians have done any war crimes against Russians
00:40:03.480
during this conflict or even before, did some bad things, I'll believe it. You don't even have to
00:40:10.080
show me an example. It just sounds like something people do. So I'm already there. I don't even need
00:40:16.240
any evidence. Yeah. It's a war. There are war crimes. Uh-huh. Both sides? Yeah. Yeah. Both sides.
00:40:22.940
Most of the time or all the time? All the time. All the time. If it were only sometimes
00:40:28.600
that wars produced war crimes, then I'd be like, let's look into this. Let's look into
00:40:34.140
these details. Got to find out who's doing it, who isn't. Well, I don't believe that. Do
00:40:39.160
you? I just think war creates war crimes. Because the people that you send into war are the people
00:40:47.500
who are going to do some war crimes. And if they didn't start that way, war can turn them
00:40:52.000
into that kind of people. And I think that there are legitimate trade-offs between, you
00:40:58.880
know, saving yourself and saving your prisoners. And people are going to say, well, I'd rather
00:41:10.400
Biden droned an innocent family. Well, intention always matters. So, yeah, intention matters.
00:41:17.960
I'm tending to think that it might be a good move, branding Putin as a war criminal. He's
00:41:26.840
never going to be tried, unless there's some kind of revolution in Russia itself, I suppose.
00:41:33.480
That's possible. But I don't see that happening. I think Russia will just continue as a degraded
00:41:38.500
country. And that's it. It'll just be a degraded country forever, for at least for a long time.
00:41:46.280
All right. I don't have much else to talk about. Is there anything I missed?
00:41:53.480
Did you hear the story about the 75-year-old activist who was at, what, several years ago?
00:42:00.120
He was out there, and the police were clearing the streets, and they shoved him, and he fell down
00:42:04.940
and hit his head. And there was some case against the police officer. And the police officer has been
00:42:10.160
completely cleared. Apparently, if you stand in front of the police and try to stop their progress,
00:42:17.280
they can push you out of the way. Turns out the police can push people out of the way if they're
00:42:23.260
trying to stop the police from doing their job. Now, I remember seeing that when it originally happened,
00:42:28.180
and people called me a ghoul for thinking I didn't see a crime there. I don't know if anybody remembers
00:42:35.800
that. I had a pretty small audience at the time. But I remember looking at it and thinking,
00:42:40.780
well, what do you think happens when you stand in front of a police action? How do you imagine that
00:42:47.160
goes? Like, was there a positive way that was going to turn out? I don't know. Now, of course,
00:42:53.300
the fact that falling down and being pushed out of the way actually caused an injury. That's not
00:42:58.400
funny. But I don't think it was the point of why he was pushed. I don't think they were trying to
00:43:04.060
hurt him. I think they were trying to get him out of the way. And I don't think that it was obvious
00:43:08.400
that that was going to, you know, be as bad as it was. All right. The Hunter Biden case is heating up?
00:43:17.660
Or is it? Or is it? Yeah, he was a local provocateur. Provocateur? Provocateur.
00:43:29.860
Or is there a new troll who's not doing a good job over here on YouTube? I hate it when the new
00:43:44.060
guy, he's not really trained on where my hot buttons are yet. He's just like flailing. Can
00:43:50.740
somebody train the new guy? By now, everybody must know my hot buttons. I'm sure you can find them.
00:43:56.540
It can't be that hard. Am I still on Prisoner Island? I am not. I am not. And not that I won't go
00:44:09.540
back. Prisoner Island recalls us on a regular basis. You do get dropped on Prisoner Island every now and
00:44:18.900
then. So let me tell you what one of my big issues was that apparently isn't a big issue.
00:44:26.540
So I thought I had a hernia. It's a little iguanal hernia or something. And I thought that
00:44:37.340
that would require surgery and probably really soon and it would ruin my whole summer. And
00:44:43.260
I really, really needed a non-pandemic summer. I mean, most of you do, but I really, really
00:44:49.180
needed it. And I went to the doctor and the doctor said, and this will surprise you, it
00:44:56.380
turns out that Googling your symptoms is just as good as a doctor. Don't listen to anybody
00:45:02.460
who tells you it doesn't. So I basically went in and said, doctor, I think I have an inguinal
00:45:10.300
hernia. And the doctor says, let me see. And it took the doctor like three seconds to say,
00:45:16.520
oh yeah, that's one. And then I said, all right, what do I do? And the doctor said, well,
00:45:21.360
you know, there's one group. Listen to this. This will dovetail into the actual live stream
00:45:30.160
content that I do. It turns out that there was a study of one group of patients that always refused
00:45:37.240
hernia surgery. Just one group. What do you think that group was? Who was the group who refused hernia
00:45:45.120
surgery even when they had a hernia? Somebody says the Amish. That wasn't where I was going.
00:45:52.160
And the answer is surgeons. Are we done here? Yeah. The group least likely to get hernia surgery to fix
00:46:01.580
it as opposed to just living with it are surgeons. And that's what my doctor told me. And so the new
00:46:09.420
thinking is that you might be better off living with it unless it worsens, right? There's some
00:46:15.420
point at which surgery is necessary. But mine is really doesn't have any pain and you can't really
00:46:21.920
see it. So there's nothing visual. There's no pain. It just is something I know exists. I'll work
00:46:28.480
around it. And so I'll have a good summer. So I was sort of on Prisoner Island and thought I'd stay
00:46:35.300
there. But I just wasn't current with the best thinking on it. And so I scared myself for no
00:46:39.900
reason. I probably will end up, I imagine, someday getting it repaired. But it won't be this summer.
00:46:50.100
Yes. Oh, you have one mesh? Got to do the other side. Yeah, maybe I'll have to. Who knows?
00:46:59.020
And that's all for now. I hope you had a great time. And I'll talk to you later.