Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 15, 2022


Episode 1714 Scott Adams： More Elon Musk Twitter Drama, Ukraine Updates, And More Stuff We Love


Episode Stats

Length

37 minutes

Words per Minute

143.40475

Word Count

5,412

Sentence Count

356

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody. Wow. You are so good looking. As always. And sexy. I know. I don't
00:00:13.500 want to leave that one out. How would you like to take this moment up a notch? It's already
00:00:20.760 the highlight of civilization. That's why you're here. But we could do better. Can't
00:00:25.200 we? Take it up a level. All you need is a copper mug or a glass, a tanker chalice or a stein,
00:00:31.160 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Correction. Correction. I have been saying
00:00:38.680 a vessel of any kind, but apparently one vessel you do not want to put your beverage in would
00:00:45.140 be a Russian missile cruiser. So let me revise this. Copper mug or glass, tanker chalice
00:00:55.180 on a plane to be a vessel of any kind except for a Russian missile cruiser. And join me
00:01:02.680 now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day. It's the thing that makes everything
00:01:08.540 better. It's pretty good already, isn't it? It's called the simultaneous sip. It's going
00:01:14.100 to happen now. Go. Well, let's take the way back machine, shall we? Dial it back one year
00:01:28.140 ago today. One year ago. Things we used to believe were true. One year ago, the Russian military
00:01:37.720 was highly capable. One year ago. China is really good at handling pandemics.
00:01:46.440 Oh, what we have learned. Suppose you had taken the opinion that everything we think is true
00:01:56.740 is wrong. How would your predictions have turned out? Pretty darn good. Just assume everything's a
00:02:05.840 lie. Everybody's lying. Everything's wrong. And every information that comes across your
00:02:11.820 consciousness is probably false or out of context or somebody's trying to manipulate you.
00:02:19.140 On one hand, you would be quite mentally ill if you lived in a world that was like the actual
00:02:27.480 world. Imagine if you were conscious all the time of the fact that everything's wrong and
00:02:35.300 everybody's trying to screw you. You really couldn't go on, could you? Like your brain would
00:02:42.180 explode. You just couldn't handle it. So we live in this lie where sometimes people are being
00:02:48.840 unselfish and everything's fine. So you have to have some kind of like a little fake movie running
00:02:56.220 in your head just to keep yourself sane. Well, here's the newest news on the Twitter and Elon Musk
00:03:03.160 situation. So the Vanguard funds, which own, I don't know, trillions of dollars of assets,
00:03:09.340 they just upped their own ownership. I think they would have been just behind Musk's ownership.
00:03:16.720 They bumped their own up ownership over 10%. Excuse me. And they usually are a force for management
00:03:28.900 stability. Now, isn't that interesting? You know, what are the odds that somebody like Vanguard would
00:03:40.820 need to come in and even get involved? And then you've also got this prince from Saudi Arabia,
00:03:47.940 Waleed, whose name I can't remember, which I don't mean to be offensive. I literally just can't remember
00:03:54.120 his name. And he's a big famous investor. And he owns a lot of Twitter as well, you know, relative to
00:04:04.080 other owners. And he says, no, he rejects Elon's offer. But he's just one stockholder, however, a big
00:04:10.780 one. Now, why is it everybody's getting involved? And, you know, Max Boot is sort of the voice of
00:04:20.280 Democrats in some ways. You know, he's, he's against it because he wants more, more, what do you call
00:04:26.700 it? More moderation in social media, not less, but more moderating of, of the unproductive content,
00:04:34.680 I guess. So what do you think? And it wasn't there some kind of the government is sort of looking into
00:04:46.340 it and going to be opening the hood and seeing what's, what's going on with Elon's various
00:04:51.500 enterprises. So why did this become like a world war? You know, how did, you know, just a billionaire
00:05:02.580 buying a company, which you'd think would be the most routine thing in the world, a billionaire
00:05:08.640 bought a company, pretty ordinary stuff. But this one's not ordinary. Is it because everybody feels
00:05:17.780 the stakes? Do you think people have finally figured out that Twitter is not just another
00:05:25.620 media platform? Do you think everybody figured that out? Twitter's not just another media platform.
00:05:33.840 Twitter is where opinions go to be formed. Because the people who tell the public who isn't paying
00:05:41.120 attention what to think, they all get their thoughts from the collective beehive that, that is Twitter.
00:05:48.040 They're not, I don't think they're getting it from Facebook or Instagram, right? I don't think any of
00:05:52.660 the journalists are going to TikTok to get an opinion on the Ukraine situation, but they're going to
00:05:58.140 Twitter to do it. So Twitter is where people learn to think and what to think, at least the thinking
00:06:05.100 people, the people who influence other people. So Twitter is where you influence the influencers.
00:06:11.180 It's the most important platform, in my opinion. I mean, you know, I'm open to a counter argument,
00:06:16.040 but to me, there's nothing even close. To me, the reason that Trump conquered Twitter is because
00:06:24.920 it's the one that matters. Conquering Twitter is what makes you present. Conquering Facebook
00:06:30.880 is what gets you more Instagram followers, right? I don't know. So I think the world has now figured
00:06:42.360 out that this is sort of a civilization-altering situation, and they want their team to be on the
00:06:50.520 right side of it, whatever team they're on. But here's my, here's my take. Could we all agree
00:06:57.860 on the following generalization? This is a generalization, so it won't be true in every
00:07:03.260 case. But don't you think that the group that is most afraid of the truth is generally the most in
00:07:10.180 favor of censorship, or some would call it moderation? Is that fair to say? The entity most afraid of the
00:07:17.640 truth is also most in favor of suppressing the truth. I mean, that almost just seems like
00:07:24.320 it's not even reasoning, it's just a definition, really. Nothing really to argue about there.
00:07:31.480 So why is it that we've seen this, a lot of people have talked about it, this censorship flip,
00:07:37.720 where it used to be the left was all about, hey, free speech, and the right was all about,
00:07:44.080 hey, there's some things you shouldn't talk about, let's not talk about that. And then it seems to
00:07:48.980 have flipped, where the conservatives are by far the ones talking about free speech, and the left is
00:07:56.400 by far the ones looking to suppress it, their opinion would be that it's dangerous, that some kinds of
00:08:03.320 speech are just dangerous. Now, why the flip? Now, first of all, do you believe that it flipped?
00:08:11.700 Because, you know, with the conservatives, we're talking about maybe music and art,
00:08:17.180 you know, but this is more about politics, so it's not exactly the right, the same thing that flipped.
00:08:22.120 But on the topic of, yeah, a lot of you say yes, it flipped. So why did it flip?
00:08:30.200 Here's my take. I just tweeted this, so I don't know how much people hate it yet.
00:08:34.040 If you go back, just go back as far as you feel like it, and would you say that the following is
00:08:42.720 true, that conservatives used to be a God-told-me kind of a party, like, you know, God first,
00:08:51.020 then God tells us how to act, and then from that, the Constitution and the country was formed.
00:08:56.480 So really, it's sort of flowing from God through the policies, right? So wouldn't you say that it
00:09:02.840 wasn't too long ago that the conservatives were connected all the way from policy through
00:09:08.820 the Bible, right? What would you say today, though? Isn't it interesting how many people
00:09:16.880 that are being identified as conservatives or conservative heroes, even if those people are
00:09:24.280 not conservative, like Elon Musk? It seems to me that conservatives went from a God-told-me
00:09:32.440 model, which is hard to defend. It's hard to defend. Now, I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm not
00:09:42.800 in that argument, so I'm not going to tell you what to believe or not to believe. I'm saying
00:09:46.420 that some arguments are simply hard to defend. And if your argument is the policy should be
00:09:51.780 X because God informed me, you kind of want to shut other people up a little bit. It's
00:09:59.740 like, well, let's not talk about this too much. We don't need to delve. We don't need
00:10:05.560 too much depth on this. Now, again, I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with that
00:10:10.360 point of view. It's not a criticism. I'm just saying that you can't defend a belief, right?
00:10:17.120 Would you believe it? I mean, that's why it's a belief. We wouldn't call it a belief if it
00:10:22.840 were easy to describe it to other people and other people say, oh, yeah, I get that. I
00:10:27.500 see what you're saying. I changed my religion immediately because of the logic you've presented.
00:10:32.660 So I would say that what Trump brought to the conservatives was do what works. Do what
00:10:39.240 works. Trump still maintained the religion being important, but important because it
00:10:46.760 works. The people who organize around a faith seem to do pretty well, and it seems to be
00:10:54.700 healthy for the country, independent of whether anybody got the right faith. So to me, it looked
00:11:01.500 like the conservatives went from hard to defend. I'm not saying it's wrong. That's a different
00:11:08.340 argument. Just a hard to defend position to an easy one to defend. Take nuclear energy.
00:11:17.680 Nuclear energy was sort of a conservative thing, and it was always easy to defend. In fact, the
00:11:25.760 very reason that nuclear energy is now more popular than ever, it's partly because of climate
00:11:31.540 change, of course. But it's because the logic was there. When you looked into it, as long
00:11:40.360 as there was no censorship, if you looked into it, it was just a good idea. So conservatives
00:11:46.840 were on the side of something that was simply a good idea. If you looked into it, the math
00:11:53.880 just works. The science works. So I would say that conservatives are no longer afraid of
00:12:00.480 free speech because free speech is complementary to their worldview, which is, does it work?
00:12:07.800 If it works, let's do more of it. Whereas I would say that liberals went from something really
00:12:13.880 easy to defend. Equal rights for all. Go back to the 60s, 70s. A liberal would be like, let me sing and
00:12:25.320 do art the way I want. If somebody doesn't want to watch it, that's fine. They have the right to
00:12:30.140 not watch it. But let me be free in my art and have equal rights for everybody. Those are really easy
00:12:38.520 to defend, aren't they? So why would they need any censorship? They don't need any censorship.
00:12:45.180 They're selling something that's really easy to defend. Equal rights for everybody. But what
00:12:51.280 happens when equal rights for everybody turns into just batshit crazy stuff? Do I even need to,
00:12:57.400 I'm not even going to give you the examples. Because when I say that the left has turned,
00:13:03.000 at least part of the left, has turned batshit crazy, I don't like to say the whole left, right?
00:13:07.820 It's part of it. You know what I'm talking about, right? So if your views went from the easiest
00:13:14.880 thing to defend, equal rights for all, to stuff that's just obviously batshit crazy,
00:13:20.160 you need a little censorship, don't you? So I don't think there's any mystery at all
00:13:26.060 to why conservatives are in favor of more free speech and the left wants less of it. It's because
00:13:34.000 the people who have reasonable worldviews can stand the extra light and the others can't.
00:13:41.060 Am I wrong? Now does that feel right? That what happened was that the actual worldviews changed
00:13:51.380 from practical to impractical and that was the switch. From practical to impractical. Now I think
00:13:57.780 the conservatives were always practical, but when they explained it in religious terms, which was
00:14:03.660 the dominant way of doing it, it didn't really feel sensible to people who were not already in that
00:14:10.260 camp. But what would be a typical conservative argument today? If you don't control the border,
00:14:20.780 too many people might come over and put pressure on your social systems, which we would like to save
00:14:30.680 for our citizens. That's not hard to defend. If you're a conservative, you want to say, let's see all
00:14:39.380 of it. Bring your cameras down to the border. You show the border. Just show us all of it. Let's talk
00:14:47.400 about everything. All the data. Right? The conservatives can stand that light. But let's say you did the
00:14:56.660 same thing with the school curriculum. You know, what's being taught to kids in school. The pandemic
00:15:03.860 showed that our school system couldn't stand sunlight. Because when kids were home Zooming, the parents got
00:15:11.400 to figure out what was going on. And that's when the trouble started. So I don't think anything really
00:15:19.100 changed in terms of how people saw censorship. It's just that their actual opinions went from,
00:15:24.660 you know, good but hard to explain to just good and easy to explain. Do the stuff that works. And liberals
00:15:33.260 did the opposite. I'm looking at your comments to see if I'm getting any agreement on this.
00:15:38.860 Because I wasn't sure I was. Am I off by myself? Or does that sound like it actually explains what
00:15:44.680 happened? All right. A little bit of agreement. All right. So the Washington Post, hilariously, and this is
00:15:57.460 something Twitter's good at, because I wouldn't have known this except I saw it on Twitter. So a Washington Post
00:16:03.960 must have been an opinion piece. Now remember, the Washington Post is owned by billionaire Jeff
00:16:10.100 Bezos. And there's an opinion piece in Jeff Bezos' publication about Musk's potential appointment
00:16:18.940 to the board. So he didn't get appointed. But Musk's appointment to Twitter's board shows that we need
00:16:25.120 regulation of social media platforms to prevent rich people from controlling our channels of communication.
00:16:31.000 So the Washington Post knows that the public is so dumb that they won't realize that this is being
00:16:40.860 written in a publication, one of the arguably two most important classic publications, you know,
00:16:48.320 mainstream publications, the Washington Post, that's owned by a billionaire, probably for the purpose
00:16:54.840 of controlling the narrative. I would think that's at least a little bit in his mind, don't you think?
00:17:01.000 So, and it's not as if the person who wrote this is not aware of it. Because of course, everybody
00:17:09.360 who writes for the Washington Post, I think, knows who owns it. So I think this depends on the reader
00:17:17.660 not knowing who owns the Washington Post. Now let me ask you this. In our little bubble that all of us
00:17:25.640 are in, because if you're watching me right now talk about this stuff, you're in a little bubble,
00:17:29.980 what percentage of the public would even know that the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos?
00:17:36.200 What do you think? 5%? I think it's closer to 5%. I don't think it's anywhere. I'm seeing estimates
00:17:47.380 like 30%. It's nowhere close to 30%. It's nowhere near that. Most people don't even know what the
00:17:55.600 Washington Post is. If you want a real wake-up call, just ask them, what is the Washington Post?
00:18:02.680 Literally, just, what is the Washington Post? And only 80% of the people will even be able to answer
00:18:08.380 the question. It's like, I think it's a newspaper or something. We are completely, we meaning all of us
00:18:17.120 involved right now, we are so blind to how little the average person cares about any of this and is
00:18:24.360 aware of who owns what and what media conglomerates are doing what. Very few people. Now, the truth is
00:18:32.040 that we very few people actually become the influential ones, not just the people watching
00:18:38.220 this. But the people paying attention are largely the ones who are moving the needle, so you don't
00:18:44.220 need to convince everybody. But it's really a wake-up call when you realize that almost nobody pays
00:18:49.640 attention to this stuff. So you can get away with saying anything because people aren't going to check.
00:18:54.640 Glenn Greenwald summed it up well in a tweet. He said, yesterday was a flagship day in corporate
00:19:05.420 media. It was a day they were forced to explicitly state what has long been clear. They not only favor
00:19:12.160 censorship, but desperately crave and depend on it. And he says, even if Musk doesn't buy Twitter,
00:19:18.760 never forget what yesterday revealed. To which my thought was, that is a really smart tweet.
00:19:27.940 And Glenn Greenwald, you should definitely follow him. I mean, his material is always fresh and smart.
00:19:35.320 Even if you disagree with it, you'll still get something out of it. But here's one where I say to
00:19:40.540 myself, yeah, I love what he's saying, and so I agree with it. But 99% of the world is completely
00:19:49.140 unaware of any of this. So I don't think the world is going to long remember how the corporate media
00:19:56.680 embarrassed itself yesterday. I don't think 99% of the world was even paying attention.
00:20:03.180 I think 1% of us noticed, and we kind of knew how things worked anyway. The 1% who already were
00:20:09.800 pretty cynical. Well, here's another example of how the Second Amendment works. If Shanghai had gun
00:20:21.880 ownership, like the United States has legal gun ownership, do you think that Shanghai would be
00:20:27.580 in a lockdown? Now, I'm not saying they should or shouldn't be. I'm no medical expert. But it
00:20:34.560 wouldn't happen. I'm pretty sure it wouldn't happen here. Now, I've heard horrific stories,
00:20:40.200 and who knows what's true, right? But that the pets are being executed, because they don't have any way
00:20:46.780 to care for the pets. So if you had a pet, you have to be, you know, maybe you have to go to quarantine
00:20:52.920 or something, but they execute the pets. Can you imagine executing pets in the United States
00:21:00.540 where there's gun ownership? Do you know what wouldn't happen in the United States?
00:21:08.240 You wouldn't execute my pet in front of me. That's what you wouldn't do. Because if you execute
00:21:14.780 my pet in front of me, that's going to be a murder situation, one way or the other. I mean,
00:21:20.760 somebody's going to get murdered. So I don't think we can underestimate how powerful that Second
00:21:30.800 Amendment is. I mean, it really does work. And I think this is a clear example. Now, have you ever
00:21:39.840 seen a thing called karma really do its thing? And we've seen it in politics a lot, right? The people
00:21:49.600 you think, oh, my God, that's a terrible person. Next thing you know, they're being, you know,
00:21:54.560 disgraced in public. It feels like karma is real, doesn't it? Have you ever noticed that? I mean, I see
00:22:01.320 no reason it should be. Like, I can't see any mechanism that would make karma actually work. But the
00:22:08.260 number of times it feels like it works. Oh, you're a little bit ahead of me. So I'm not going to give you
00:22:16.520 the whole background of the story. But there was an individual who, let's say, had made it his job
00:22:22.140 to make my life unpleasant. And was spending serious time coming after me. For, I don't know,
00:22:30.280 didn't matter. Just, I guess I had said some critical things about his cult. If you make fun of
00:22:39.100 somebody's cult, I guess they come after you. So it's somebody who came after me with a weak attack.
00:22:44.760 And I was mostly ignoring it. But there was a little news item that he's, he just, he's going to
00:22:52.480 jail for sex trafficking. And I say to myself, I don't, sometimes karma. Sometimes karma. Yeah,
00:23:05.360 his last name was Taint, I believe. T-A-I-N-T. Andrew Taint. Anyway, that happened. That kind of made me
00:23:15.820 happy yesterday. Did you see the story about the Moskva? That's Russia's cruiser. And they tried
00:23:24.620 to tow it back. And it sunk. It sunk on the way back. And that's not really, really cool if you're
00:23:36.080 Russia. Now, that's the way the story is reported. But you know, the story is always, it's always
00:23:42.220 propaganda any time there's war. So don't really believe anything. Right? The official story,
00:23:48.720 the official misinformation story is that there was a missile, maybe Ukraine fired it, it hit this,
00:23:55.680 you know, their biggest, biggest flagship in their Black Sea. And maybe it wounded it critically. And
00:24:02.220 when they tried to take it back, it sank. But we've been fooled before, right? Remember when you thought
00:24:08.900 that Putin was really trying to take Kiev? But we found out really his play was to not take Kiev,
00:24:16.060 but rather to, that's just a head fake. And he's really going to take the Donbass.
00:24:23.280 So really, sometimes it looks like he's, they're trying for something big, but the real goal might
00:24:28.780 be something more limited. It's a standard military thing. And I think that's what's happening with the
00:24:33.420 Moskva. Because some of the people who are really better at this military analysis have noted that
00:24:41.300 it's not so much that the missile cruiser sunk. It's more that it's a staging itself for an attack
00:24:50.380 on SpongeBob SquarePants, his pineapple. And some could say that that would be Putin scaling back
00:24:58.600 his ambitions from taking all of Ukraine to maybe seriously wounding SpongeBob SquarePants and
00:25:06.900 possibly even damaging his pineapple. So that's happening now. But in the other world,
00:25:15.980 in the other world, I saw a tweet from some expert who has a contrarian view of Ukraine.
00:25:25.400 And it is really, it is really fascinating when you read the opposite propaganda, because I don't think
00:25:33.580 there's anything that's really true, but at least anything we're seeing. I wouldn't know what was
00:25:39.900 true if I saw it. But the propaganda is so opposite, it's really a head spinner, because you can look at
00:25:46.640 the same facts and come to opposite conclusions. All right, here's one movie. In one movie,
00:25:53.780 Russia never meant to take Kiev, and you can tell that, because they brought so few forces.
00:25:59.080 They were just trying to bog down that part of the army, Ukraine military. And then when they'd done
00:26:04.420 that, they would do what they did now, and circle most of the Ukraine military that had been amassed
00:26:10.760 near Donbass. And they'll circle them. They're already in the process of eliminating all the fuel
00:26:17.340 sources, fuel depots, and food sources and stuff for the Ukraine military. And at this point, there's
00:26:24.760 no question that Russia, who does have better supply lines, will be able to outlast the Ukraine
00:26:31.180 military. They'll encircle them, they'll starve them, and they'll destroy them. Now, mostly,
00:26:36.900 they're looking for these bad characters, we're told, the so-called neo-Nazis paramilitary
00:26:44.620 forces that are in that region that Putin keeps calling Nazis that he's trying to get rid of.
00:26:50.500 So that's one story. Now, in that version, Putin is basically already in the endgame, and he's
00:26:57.480 definitely going to get what he wants, which is he's going to destroy the Ukrainian military
00:27:02.380 capability, and then kind of do anything he wants. Or at least Ukraine is going to be really,
00:27:09.780 really flexible, because he might want to keep Zelensky in power, but let Zelensky know that he
00:27:15.960 can mow down Ukraine again if he doesn't do what he wants. And some say that Putin really wants to
00:27:24.100 just totally eliminate the Azov people and, you know, the sketchier elements. So that's one view.
00:27:33.320 The other view is that the naval battle has been won by Ukraine, because the biggest ship has sunk,
00:27:42.140 and the rest of their fleet apparently pulled back from the coast. So I don't know how effective the
00:27:47.580 Navy is at this point. Is the Navy even in the battle? Is the Navy important? I don't even know if it
00:27:52.740 doesn't matter. So he says the Moskva is being retrofitted as a submarine. All right.
00:28:02.260 So one view would be that Zelensky saved the capital and beat back the Russians with their clever
00:28:11.020 attacks, and that now the Ukraine can focus on the battle in the south. And now they've taken out
00:28:18.740 Russia's, you know, seafaring capabilities. They still have some, you know, Russia still doesn't
00:28:26.100 command the skies. So you could actually tell the story in which heavy equipment is coming into the
00:28:32.620 Ukrainian military, etc. But I think I would agree with this one military expert, or lots of them
00:28:38.300 actually, who say that it's really just a supply chain war, right? Because it doesn't look like anybody
00:28:45.440 can wipe out anybody, except squeeze their supply chains. So doesn't it only come down to that now?
00:28:54.240 It's a supply chain war. And if you could understand who's going to win that, well, you know how it's
00:29:00.480 going to go, I think. Yeah, I know the Navy sits offshore and shells interior targets, but I don't hear that
00:29:09.000 happening a lot. I'm not hearing reports that they are shelling from the Navy, or from the sea. And I'm not sure
00:29:18.540 they have the right, they don't even have the right assets there for that, do they? Because the missile cruiser
00:29:24.860 is gone. The rest of them were not missile cruisers, were they? Or were they? I don't know.
00:29:29.560 Oh, is somebody saying that Russia stockpiled tons of supplies for seven years? Well, we did see
00:29:39.440 reports that their operations in the north of Ukraine were running low on supplies. But we don't know if
00:29:47.920 that's true, because I'm not sure that anything makes sense at this point, or anything's believable
00:29:54.260 at this point. All right, Rasmussen has a poll, says if the elections for Congress were held today,
00:30:00.820 a generic Republican would get 47% of the vote, and a generic Democrat would get 39%. Now, that's a
00:30:07.500 pretty big spread. It's a nine-point spread, and so that would certainly indicate that the Republicans
00:30:12.660 are going to sweep everything. But it's down from 11, and 11 is down from 15. At the start of the year,
00:30:22.520 there was a 15-point spread between the generic Republican and Democrat. Now it's already down
00:30:27.280 to nine. What exactly happened that made the Democrats look better in the last few months?
00:30:36.460 Quick, name their successes in the last few months. How in the world could that even happen?
00:30:41.300 How does Ukraine? Ukraine? You think Ukraine is helping the Democrats somehow? I don't know,
00:30:53.960 maybe. Putin-Brace. Well, most of the shift is coming in independence. So almost all of it is
00:31:03.180 independence. Why are independents moving? Now, it makes sense that they're the only ones that can move,
00:31:08.940 like nobody else is going to move. But why are they moving now? Oh, Supreme Court? Supreme Court,
00:31:16.900 maybe, huh? Abortion? I don't know. The LGBTQ stuff? It's hard to say. I don't really,
00:31:29.620 I don't see a reason for it, really. But maybe it's something that Republicans are doing that's
00:31:35.220 turning off the independence. Instead of saying, what are the Democrats succeeding at? What did the
00:31:42.160 Republicans do in the last few months that made them look especially bad? Is it the January 6th stuff?
00:31:48.060 Yeah, okay. Well, I wouldn't get too cocky if I were Republicans, because the one thing that's the
00:32:04.820 most predictable thing is that this will narrow until Election Day, don't you think? Don't you think
00:32:11.060 that gap will just keep narrowing? Because there aren't really that many undecided people. People are
00:32:16.680 going to, people will gravitate to their teams just like they always do. I think saying you're
00:32:22.020 independent is just a luxury that you have, so people don't ask you too many questions, and you
00:32:29.240 don't have to make a decision, or at least tell people your decision until the last minute.
00:32:35.900 All right. That, ladies and gentlemen, is my content for today. Is there anything I missed?
00:32:45.200 How many of you think Elon is, let's say, I think Mark Cuban was saying that Elon Musk is just playing
00:32:55.160 a game, and he's going to sort of pump up his price, and maybe screw with the FEC or somebody,
00:33:02.160 and that it's really sort of just a game, and he's going to make some money and sell his shares?
00:33:07.220 I don't think it's a game. Yeah. I don't think it's a game at all. I think that he does everything
00:33:16.920 with a twinkle in his eye, but that's just his style. So we're used to that.
00:33:25.600 Yeah. And does it seem to you that the only thing the left is really afraid of is Trump coming back
00:33:32.140 on Twitter? It's really that, isn't it? Because nobody else really matters that much. To the
00:33:38.740 left, do they really care if the characters who got banned come back? They don't really
00:33:45.780 care if the people with, you know, 100,000 followers get banned or come back. That doesn't
00:33:50.560 make any difference. Project Veritas, maybe. Yeah. I think it's all about Trump.
00:33:57.800 All right. And what do you think is going to happen with the truth network? Nobody's ever solved
00:34:08.280 the problem that conservatives will come to a platform used by the left, but the left won't go
00:34:17.040 to a platform used by the right. How do you solve that? That doesn't seem solvable, does it?
00:34:23.060 Yeah. So it feels like trying to solve the unsolvable. Somebody was getting mad at me
00:34:33.420 on Twitter today. I finally had to block them. It was somebody who was complaining that I wasn't
00:34:38.040 doing enough, me personally, enough to promote their cause. And their cause was, I'm going to
00:34:44.000 use very general language, because there's some topics I don't even like to talk about. But
00:34:49.640 let's just say that there's an issue that on Twitter, there is content involving underage
00:34:58.060 people that you wouldn't want anywhere. And so somebody who was active in that area, trying
00:35:07.680 to get it off there, was saying, hey, can you help us get Elon Musk on board with getting
00:35:15.100 rid of this material? And to which I thought, okay, I'm not going to get involved in this
00:35:19.900 at all. Because number one, I don't believe that Twitter doesn't take down that material
00:35:25.200 when you report it. Do you? Do you believe that if you report inappropriate underage material
00:35:33.860 on Twitter, you think they're not going to take it down? Now, somebody said there have to
00:35:38.640 be enough complaints. I'm not sure that's true. I mean, I think that maybe it puts a higher
00:35:46.400 in the rank or something. But the fact is, as long as people are willing to get caught
00:35:51.580 and taken down, they're always going to do it. So what exactly would be the solution?
00:35:58.280 So I was arguing that I'm not going to get involved in something that can't be solved.
00:36:02.660 And what can't be solved is somebody with a fake account posting something inappropriate
00:36:08.400 that takes a little while to come down. There's nothing you can do about that. And the person
00:36:13.700 arguing with me said, no, you can write an algorithm. To which I said, there's no algorithm
00:36:19.580 that knows what you're going to do before you do it. And I don't know if there's an algorithm
00:36:24.100 that can understand a video. Because the people who would have that content would learn in,
00:36:30.300 well, they already know not to use the standard words, right? So they wouldn't post anything
00:36:35.000 that used keywords that would attract attention. So I found myself in this awkward situation
00:36:44.480 where it would look like I'm in favor of something that, of course, nobody is in favor of, except
00:36:49.260 the people doing it, I guess. Just because I wasn't willing to help on something that seemed
00:36:54.800 logically impossible. It seems logically impossible. Now, I get that you might be able to shave off
00:37:02.680 some minutes between the time it's posted and the time that it gets taken down. But I'm not
00:37:08.880 really going to spend a lot of time trying to save a few minutes on that. That doesn't feel
00:37:14.080 like where the value is. Yes, name that movie. All right, that's all I got for now. And I think,
00:37:28.260 oh, here we go. What is it? You could review content before it's posted to public.
00:37:35.760 Well, for everybody? See, you'd have to do it for everybody. That's the problem.
00:37:40.680 All right, that's all. And I'll talk to you tomorrow.