Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1739 Scott Adams： Would Putin Be A Democrat Or Republican If He Lived In The United States？

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody. And are you lucky? Yeah, because you're here and everybody else isn't.

00:00:10.480 Well, you know. And if you're here, you are already participating on the upside, right?

00:00:18.320 It's one of the best things that will ever happen in the history of humanity. It's going to happen

00:00:23.960 right now, and you're part of it. And if you'd like to take it up to heretofore unknown levels,

00:00:28.620 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a gel or a glass, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:34.860 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:43.420 It's the dopamine hit of the day. You can feel your body start to respond even as I prepare.

00:00:49.440 As soon as you take this hit, this hit, yeah, a little bit of a dopamine spike, it might last you all day.

00:00:55.220 Go.

00:00:58.620 Oh, yeah.

00:01:04.620 Mm-mm-mm.

00:01:06.540 So did everybody see the viral photo of Mark Zuckerberg taking a selfie with his staff?

00:01:14.060 I guess the Internet's having a lot of fun with this.

00:01:16.320 The caption I thought was the funniest was, Zuckerberg, take your selfie just like the humans.

00:01:24.620 I don't know if you've seen this.

00:01:26.460 Just like the humans.

00:01:31.000 And there's another tweet from News 18.

00:01:36.280 It says, Mark Zuckerberg's soulless selfie with colleagues fuels alien theory once again.

00:01:42.760 The theory that Zuckerberg's an alien.

00:01:44.600 I don't know, it does look like a soulless selfie.

00:01:49.980 If anybody was ever an alien from the future, or actually a time traveler, you know, somebody who went back in time, it would have to be Zuckerberg.

00:02:01.900 Right?

00:02:03.680 Scott is overtired.

00:02:05.080 You're right.

00:02:06.140 You're right.

00:02:06.600 I am underslept and overtired.

00:02:09.360 But I'm going to try to take care of that this week.

00:02:11.500 Well, here's a new discovery that might change everything.

00:02:15.000 It turns out that there's a rare material that you need for a fusion.

00:02:18.500 And we didn't think we had much of it, because it exists mostly in space and on the moon.

00:02:24.580 And it's hard to get your raw materials from the moon.

00:02:26.700 It's hard to get it from China, much less the moon.

00:02:30.720 But apparently this thing called helium-3 is ten times more likely, or ten times more abundant on Earth than we thought.

00:02:38.640 So that's really good news for future cheap energy.

00:02:43.680 We're probably a number of years away from that.

00:02:45.620 But as you know, fusion is working now.

00:02:49.020 Where it has never worked in the past.

00:02:51.260 And by working, I mean they can create more energy than they use for the first time.

00:02:56.160 So now it's an engineering problem, and we will have fusion and the solution to everything.

00:03:02.100 Which is almost true.

00:03:04.220 If you had abundant, cheap energy, it would be very close to the solution of everything.

00:03:11.100 Everything.

00:03:11.600 Everything would be cheaper, better.

00:03:13.740 You'd have less climate problems.

00:03:15.960 You'd have just everything.

00:03:18.500 All right.

00:03:21.720 Rasmussen did a poll and asked American likely voters, who do they think is winning the war, the Russia-Ukraine situation.

00:03:29.080 And I was a little bit surprised at this answer.

00:03:33.700 15% won five, say that Russia is winning the war.

00:03:38.100 Only 15% of people polled think Russia is winning the war.

00:03:48.500 Now, is that because Russia is not winning the war?

00:03:52.080 Or is that because that's what the news told us?

00:03:55.140 Because I don't know how you could say they're not winning.

00:03:59.460 It's really just a question of how much expense they're willing to absorb and how much political and other capital they're willing to put in.

00:04:08.260 But I don't think you could necessarily tell anybody who's winning or losing at this point, can you?

00:04:14.100 Because like I say, it's going to be a tipping point situation.

00:04:17.560 One of the two sides will reach some kind of a tipping point.

00:04:20.300 But you never really know which one is the closest to the tipping point.

00:04:24.060 Not really.

00:04:24.800 It's too much fog of war.

00:04:25.860 So, 25% of respondees said that Ukraine is winning.

00:04:35.140 25%.

00:04:35.740 25%.

00:04:37.340 25%.

00:04:40.100 Say Ukraine, which has been completely destroyed, is winning the war.

00:04:47.700 Interesting.

00:04:49.600 25%.

00:04:50.240 42% say it's a stalemate.

00:04:52.740 Now, I, of course, fall into the maybe 25% this time.

00:05:00.660 Because I think I'm like the only person dumb enough to say in public, what if they win?

00:05:08.900 You know, for me, it's always been, you know, are you so sure Russia is going to win this thing? 0.89

00:05:14.860 And let me ask you, do you know anybody who's been talking about this publicly?

00:05:19.560 You know, anybody who does this for a living, so to speak?

00:05:23.400 Did anybody else say that Russia would have as hard a time as they're having?

00:05:27.860 Because I said it from the start.

00:05:30.000 In fact, I was predicting that they wouldn't even attack.

00:05:34.680 Because it seemed so obvious that we would be in the place where we are now.

00:05:38.500 To me, it looked obvious.

00:05:40.140 But, you know, what do I know?

00:05:41.640 Everything looks smart if you get one right.

00:05:44.400 If you guess right, then you're pretty sure it's because of your genius, not because you guessed right.

00:05:49.200 That's sort of what I'm feeling right now.

00:05:51.420 I think it was my great insight, not my luck.

00:05:55.140 But I was completely wrong that they wouldn't attack.

00:05:59.000 But I was completely right that Ukraine would surprise with high-tech weaponry. 0.97

00:06:04.900 And that the attack would not be easy, and here we are.

00:06:09.760 So, but I'm kind of amazed at the effect of the news.

00:06:15.320 The news has actually convinced people that Russia is losing the war.

00:06:19.500 And maybe they are, in some sense, or maybe they will.

00:06:24.180 But, hmm.

00:06:27.380 Then Rasmussen asked, likely, U.S. voters, should the U.S. be involved if there's a wider war in Europe?

00:06:35.200 46% said yes.

00:06:38.300 And 31% said no.

00:06:40.420 So, apparently, the U.S. has been properly primed.

00:06:43.680 Not completely.

00:06:45.160 You need to get that over 50%.

00:06:46.880 But the U.S. has been primed for a major world war.

00:06:51.640 And that the population is largely on board with World War III.

00:06:59.680 Do you see the impact of propaganda and fake news in this?

00:07:05.180 It feels like these opinions are completely assigned, right?

00:07:09.680 How long have I been saying that people don't come up with their own opinions?

00:07:13.580 Opinions are assigned.

00:07:14.600 You know, Democrats have their opinions assigned to them.

00:07:17.960 Republicans have their opinions assigned to them.

00:07:20.340 But then we think that we thought it out.

00:07:22.960 You know, after the fact, we say, I think I thought this through and came to this opinion.

00:07:26.860 No, you didn't.

00:07:28.020 It's not likely.

00:07:29.360 If you have the same opinion as your team, it was probably assigned.

00:07:33.800 If not this time, sometime in the past.

00:07:37.280 Oh, let me see this.

00:07:38.160 All right.

00:07:45.340 Here's some obvious-sounding fake news.

00:07:48.620 I'm going to say this is fake news because it sounds exactly like other fake news.

00:07:54.340 So, you know, there's this book by Mark Esper.

00:07:56.540 He had been Trump's, what was he, defense secretary?

00:08:01.580 And he says that Trump, when the Black Lives Matter protesters were surrounding the Capitol, I guess,

00:08:09.580 Trump asked, can't you shoot protesters in the leg or something?

00:08:13.980 And then Esper interpreted that as the president wanting the military to shoot people in the legs.

00:08:21.080 Now, what do we know about Trump's decision-making process?

00:08:27.720 Does this sound like real news or fake news?

00:08:30.760 Because I'm willing to accept that Trump said those words.

00:08:35.880 But is he interpreting this right?

00:08:38.620 Actually, I'm willing to accept he actually said those words.

00:08:41.340 You know why?

00:08:42.520 Because it's the way he treats every topic.

00:08:44.400 Everything we hear about him behind closed doors is he always tosses out a Republican idea just to see what happens.

00:08:56.120 So he tosses out an extreme idea that usually comes from some Republican, you know, person just to see what the response is.

00:09:04.920 So you don't think that there were some Republicans somewhere who were saying,

00:09:08.000 why don't you shoot the protesters in the leg?

00:09:09.880 Or maybe he was talking about rubber bullets.

00:09:12.160 Right, that context would be left out.

00:09:13.600 But even the rubber bullets is pretty extreme.

00:09:16.400 That's pretty extreme.

00:09:20.200 And so you heard him say that?

00:09:22.920 Yeah, but it sounds like the sort of thing that he says on every topic.

00:09:27.080 You know, could we use a nuke?

00:09:29.040 Should we shoot him in the leg?

00:09:31.200 You know, can we lob a missile into the cartels?

00:09:34.920 You see the pattern?

00:09:36.380 The pattern is he asks the question about the most extreme response.

00:09:40.880 And then as Esper's described, the Esper and I guess a few of the aides walked him back from the idea of using the military at all, all the way to not using the military.

00:09:53.980 And then Trump agreed.

00:09:56.000 Well, what is the problem if Trump throws out an extreme suggestion and then his advisors say, no, the extreme doesn't work, but we'll walk you back to what might work?

00:10:07.300 Isn't that exactly what you want?

00:10:10.740 Like, not even a little bit wrong?

00:10:14.560 Imagine if he had never even floated an idea that's the extreme version.

00:10:19.900 You have to float the extreme version, don't you?

00:10:22.700 That feels like good management to me.

00:10:25.460 You put out the extreme and then you make people argue for the middle ground.

00:10:29.400 Make them work for it.

00:10:31.100 He made them work for it, did he not?

00:10:34.780 I mean, I don't see how people are, like, oblivious to the fact that he made his advisors work to sell their opinion and that he bought it.

00:10:44.640 And then he bought it.

00:10:45.440 If you make your advisors work for it and then you accept their recommendation because you saw the work, okay.

00:10:53.180 Because apparently the way they talked him back was through a pretty rational, you know, cost-benefit analysis.

00:11:01.200 And then once he heard the cost-benefit analysis, he said, okay, we'll do that.

00:11:05.860 What the hell is the problem with that?

00:11:08.760 The problem is people telling other people internal conversations.

00:11:13.580 The problem is Esper.

00:11:15.440 This is a story about Esper being a bad person, meaning that he's talking about private deliberations, which included brainstorming.

00:11:25.580 If you're talking about a private brainstorming conversation in which the point of it is to throw out, you know, throw out all the ideas and just see what the reaction is.

00:11:36.660 And that's exactly what he was doing.

00:11:38.700 Threw out an idea and asked for a reaction.

00:11:40.460 If that stuff is what you're leaking, you're a fucking asshole, really.

00:11:46.260 That is just so low, in my opinion.

00:11:50.120 Because it's clearly an attempt to make it look like it was more of a serious idea than it was.

00:11:56.100 That's how you sell a book.

00:11:57.980 So he's basically throwing the president of the United States under a bus to sell a frickin' book.

00:12:03.620 Is that a patriot?

00:12:06.240 It doesn't sound like it.

00:12:08.000 It doesn't sound like a patriot.

00:12:09.920 And by the way, this has nothing to do with Trump or Republican or Democrat.

00:12:14.040 I would say exactly the same thing if we were talking about a Democrat.

00:12:18.140 Exactly the same thing.

00:12:19.660 If somebody is talking about the brainstorming conversations and trying to sell that out of context,

00:12:25.760 that's just weasel behavior. 0.99

00:12:27.420 That's just horrible behavior.

00:12:29.460 Such a jerk.

00:12:30.120 Anyway, apparently now we have fake news, of course, everywhere.

00:12:38.580 But now there's something called fake job acceptance,

00:12:42.600 where I guess the job market is so hot and so hard to get good employees these days

00:12:47.560 that the Wall Street Journal is reporting the incidence of so-called ghosting,

00:12:55.900 of accepting offers and then saying that you'll start and then not showing up is at a record high.

00:13:01.420 So people are accepting jobs and just not going because they get another job usually

00:13:07.240 or they change their mind.

00:13:09.080 They don't even bother calling.

00:13:11.280 Eh, I might be back on Monday, but then again I might not.

00:13:15.780 So I don't know what to say about this except everything is fake now.

00:13:24.940 You know, it's a fake news, fake, you know, you throw in your own fakes, whatever.

00:13:29.820 But now even fake job acceptance.

00:13:33.080 That's a new high.

00:13:34.540 I keep hearing about people with two jobs.

00:13:36.960 How many people do you know who are working remotely and have two complete jobs

00:13:42.560 and the employers don't know that they're working two jobs?

00:13:46.340 In the comments, do you know anybody personally?

00:13:49.940 Somebody says they know many people.

00:13:53.340 A bunch of yeses going by.

00:13:56.440 Yes.

00:13:57.800 Yes.

00:13:59.080 We fired one doing it.

00:14:00.720 They found somebody doing it and fired him.

00:14:03.080 Been thinking about it, giggling, what a great idea.

00:14:06.220 Yes, yes.

00:14:07.140 Apparently it's widespread.

00:14:09.200 It's pretty widespread.

00:14:10.240 So it doesn't matter how many no's we hear,

00:14:13.060 the fact that there are lots of people who say yes

00:14:15.220 tells me it's pretty widespread.

00:14:18.780 So I don't even know if that's a bad thing, is it?

00:14:22.200 Because think about a typical full-time employee.

00:14:26.140 Do you ever get more than 50% productivity out of an employee?

00:14:30.760 Not really.

00:14:32.080 Because it seems like after you do the important stuff,

00:14:35.320 everything else is a meeting or something less important.

00:14:38.980 I feel like you could do the important stuff for two different jobs

00:14:42.440 fairly easily if you skipped all the unimportant stuff,

00:14:46.980 like commuting.

00:14:48.340 I mean, imagine the people who are commuting 90 minutes a day.

00:14:51.660 If you gave me an extra 90 minutes and said,

00:14:55.000 look, you can bank the 90 minutes so you can use that for your second job,

00:14:59.840 but also we'll take, let's say we'll shave 20% off of your main job,

00:15:04.320 add that there.

00:15:06.280 Then you have almost enough to sell it to the new employer.

00:15:09.720 Almost enough time.

00:15:14.620 So you might see more of that.

00:15:17.860 Meanwhile, in international relations,

00:15:20.360 Finland is getting close to requesting joining NATO,

00:15:25.160 which would put a NATO member on Russia's border with an 800-mile border.

00:15:34.040 And apparently Finland has been using U.S. equipment for years,

00:15:37.200 so that's an easy transition to NATO.

00:15:40.320 And they have actually an unusually strong military.

00:15:44.140 Did you know that?

00:15:45.420 Apparently Finland has a really good military.

00:15:48.300 I guess you have to if you're on the border of Russia.

00:15:50.300 So what has Putin decided will be his attack on Finland?

00:15:57.140 Well, he's decided that the Finns are Nazis.

00:16:00.520 That's right.

00:16:01.880 So Putin basically has one strategy.

00:16:04.400 Well, if you don't like me, you're some kind of a Nazi.

00:16:06.860 And he can always make an argument for it.

00:16:08.920 So in this case, the argument is that Finland, I think,

00:16:11.740 fought with the Nazis.

00:16:14.300 So he's going to call Finland a bunch of Nazis.

00:16:16.400 Sweden is also considering joining Finland at some point,

00:16:20.840 and it seems like they'd have a good shot at it.

00:16:23.920 Now, this raises the question,

00:16:26.160 if the whole reason we're having a war with Ukraine

00:16:28.720 is because Ukraine was flirting with NATO,

00:16:32.260 why would we do more of it?

00:16:34.880 Why would we do more of the thing that caused the war? 0.99

00:16:37.860 Is it because we think Putin is so beaten down by this war

00:16:42.060 that we can just push him?

00:16:43.720 Because pushing Putin is what got us in the war, right?

00:16:48.880 Didn't we sort of push him into attacking Ukraine? 0.59

00:16:52.220 So are we going to push him into attacking Finland?

00:16:54.820 Or is he so beat up from Ukraine 1.00

00:16:57.920 that he wouldn't have the will to attack anybody else?

00:17:02.400 I don't know.

00:17:03.340 You know, I like the idea that was floated about,

00:17:05.540 I think Macron said it, and who was it?

00:17:08.960 Somebody else said it.

00:17:09.940 That there should be some other kind of organization

00:17:13.020 that's not called NATO.

00:17:15.240 So you could kind of weasel it.

00:17:17.700 And I think maybe Trump has suggested this.

00:17:19.860 I heard. I haven't heard him say it.

00:17:21.700 But the idea would be you'd have some kind of

00:17:24.860 protection association,

00:17:27.740 but you wouldn't call it NATO.

00:17:30.840 I don't know.

00:17:31.520 Does that buy you anything?

00:17:32.360 What do you say?

00:17:41.160 Google the Finnish prime ministers.

00:17:43.980 I know exactly what you're saying.

00:17:45.780 It turns out that the Finnish prime minister

00:17:48.920 is a woman who is attractive.

00:17:50.780 That's why you told me to Google it, right?

00:17:53.400 I saw the picture today,

00:17:55.320 and I thought,

00:17:56.600 that really looks like she got a,

00:17:58.160 she got kind of a political boost

00:18:00.200 by her appearance.

00:18:03.340 But yes,

00:18:04.320 they have an attractive prime minister,

00:18:06.180 apparently.

00:18:09.060 And that alone is reason enough

00:18:10.760 to put them in NATO, I say.

00:18:13.500 What do you think about this?

00:18:14.720 Let me ask you.

00:18:16.220 Wisdom of the crowd time.

00:18:18.180 Do you think it's a good idea

00:18:19.400 or a bad idea

00:18:20.160 for Finland to join NATO?

00:18:22.580 Go.

00:18:23.280 Good idea or bad idea

00:18:24.880 for Finland to join NATO?

00:18:26.480 All right.

00:18:28.200 I'll read your responses.

00:18:29.180 They always go by faster

00:18:30.620 on the locals' platform.

00:18:32.480 I'm seeing a mix.

00:18:34.100 More bad than good,

00:18:35.740 but definitely a mix.

00:18:37.200 Looks like 50-50?

00:18:39.960 60-40?

00:18:41.540 All right.

00:18:42.440 A lot of disagreement on this.

00:18:45.040 It's a good idea because of Ukraine. 1.00

00:18:47.520 Maybe.

00:18:48.400 Yeah, we don't really know, do we?

00:18:50.600 So if you don't know

00:18:51.660 if it's a good idea or a bad idea,

00:18:53.200 what do you do?

00:18:54.480 What do you do?

00:18:55.820 What do you do if you don't know,

00:18:57.520 if you legitimately don't know

00:18:58.940 if it's a good idea or a bad idea?

00:19:00.620 What do you do?

00:19:02.280 Do you do something or nothing?

00:19:05.240 If you don't know,

00:19:06.980 why would you spend money on it?

00:19:09.260 So here's a decision-making suggestion.

00:19:12.960 If you think it might make a big difference,

00:19:15.200 but it's sort of a toss-up,

00:19:17.040 one of them is very expensive

00:19:18.720 and one of them is not.

00:19:20.620 You would do the one that's less expensive

00:19:22.140 if you really, really didn't know the difference.

00:19:25.740 If you suspected there was a difference

00:19:27.720 and let's say your own security mattered,

00:19:33.000 then you might make a different decision.

00:19:36.600 All right.

00:19:37.700 Well, I don't know.

00:19:40.680 I don't know if it's going to happen.

00:19:42.600 I feel as if delaying it would make a difference

00:19:45.300 because you don't want to give Putin too much of a loss

00:19:51.300 or else he can't negotiate his way out of it, right?

00:19:54.620 You don't want it to be too embarrassing for Putin

00:19:57.240 while you also need to negotiate.

00:20:01.700 So that might make sense

00:20:02.840 to just put the Finland decision off.

00:20:05.540 Like, just don't put it in the current mix.

00:20:07.920 Just delay it a little bit.

00:20:09.980 Something like that.

00:20:10.620 All right.

00:20:12.300 So I provocatively tweeted the following question.

00:20:15.780 If Putin were president of America,

00:20:18.540 would he be a Democrat or Republican?

00:20:21.800 As you might not be surprised,

00:20:24.540 it got a lot of attention on Twitter.

00:20:27.380 So here are the things we know about Putin,

00:20:29.400 and we're going to try to decide

00:20:30.720 if he sounds more like a Democrat

00:20:32.300 or more like a Republican

00:20:33.680 if he were an American.

00:20:35.360 All right.

00:20:35.820 So here are some things we know about Putin.

00:20:38.140 He calls his opponents Nazis.

00:20:40.620 Okay.

00:20:43.140 Is that Republican or Democrat?

00:20:45.100 He censors speech.

00:20:48.040 Democrat or Republican.

00:20:50.280 He favors universal health care.

00:20:54.280 He creates lots of fake news.

00:20:58.460 He favors abortion, apparently,

00:21:00.580 because Russia has one of the highest rates

00:21:02.740 of abortion of any country.

00:21:04.580 Now, he is trying to get the abortion rate down,

00:21:06.420 but in terms of making it legal,

00:21:08.800 it's about as legal as you can get.

00:21:11.960 He puts protesters in jail,

00:21:14.940 and he favors, in Russia,

00:21:18.100 they have very strict background checks

00:21:19.620 for gun buyers.

00:21:20.520 You can buy a gun,

00:21:22.200 just like the United States,

00:21:23.800 but they're very strict

00:21:24.820 on your mental health background

00:21:27.060 and background checks.

00:21:28.900 So you can't buy a gun in Russia

00:21:31.360 unless there's a background,

00:21:32.440 full background check.

00:21:35.860 So does that sound more Democrat

00:21:38.040 or more Republican?

00:21:40.260 What do you think?

00:21:42.920 All right.

00:21:43.480 Obviously, I left down some things.

00:21:46.640 I'm just trying to get people riled up

00:21:49.000 because it's fun.

00:21:50.720 So here would be some arguments

00:21:52.140 that he is a Republican.

00:21:54.620 Putin likes a strong military,

00:21:57.560 but he didn't fund one, did he?

00:22:02.760 He wants a strong military,

00:22:04.440 but looks like he underspent.

00:22:07.620 Who says they want a strong military,

00:22:09.800 but they don't spend money to get one?

00:22:11.360 It sounds like a Democrat, doesn't it?

00:22:15.120 If he wanted a strong military,

00:22:16.900 and we saw evidence

00:22:17.720 that he had funded

00:22:18.500 a well-maintained, strong military,

00:22:21.160 then I would say,

00:22:22.160 oh, that sounds more Republican.

00:22:27.420 But it is a high percentage of GDP,

00:22:29.480 so that sounds a little more Republican that way.

00:22:32.980 All right.

00:22:33.200 How about Russia just a few years ago

00:22:38.420 passed an anti-gay marriage bill.

00:22:42.360 So marriage in Russia

00:22:43.900 is between a, quote,

00:22:45.380 man and a woman.

00:22:46.700 Got to put that in quotes these days.

00:22:49.000 That sounds more neither, right?

00:22:53.240 That's basically neither.

00:22:54.820 Because these days,

00:22:55.920 I was trying to think,

00:22:56.620 when is the last time you heard

00:22:57.720 a Republican complaining about gay marriage?

00:23:02.000 Let me ask you this.

00:23:03.020 I know you've heard it, of course,

00:23:04.640 but when was the last time?

00:23:08.280 The last time I heard any Republican

00:23:10.380 online, on Twitter,

00:23:13.420 personally,

00:23:15.100 complaining about gay marriage?

00:23:17.040 I haven't heard it in years.

00:23:20.800 Have you?

00:23:21.900 It's just a total don't care.

00:23:24.340 Now, the concern about gay marriage 0.93

00:23:26.080 is that it would have some impact

00:23:27.580 on your life,

00:23:29.800 yours, let's say, hypothetically,

00:23:31.220 if you were a heterosexual married couple.

00:23:34.720 So somehow you thought

00:23:35.680 it would affect you, right?

00:23:37.360 I mean, that was the whole reason

00:23:38.600 anybody would be opposed to it.

00:23:41.660 It would have some effect on you.

00:23:44.120 But did it?

00:23:45.420 Did it?

00:23:46.700 Is there any Republican who says,

00:23:48.300 ah, everything was good for me

00:23:50.160 and my family

00:23:50.740 until the gays could get married? 0.98

00:23:52.100 Like, you can always understand

00:23:55.900 why anybody would be afraid

00:23:57.320 of anything new,

00:23:59.540 no matter what it is, right?

00:24:01.020 We're just,

00:24:01.800 we have a reflex

00:24:02.580 to be afraid of something new.

00:24:04.280 So that makes sense.

00:24:05.640 But once you've done it,

00:24:07.920 and there are over

00:24:08.580 half a million gay couples

00:24:11.960 who are married,

00:24:14.180 does gay cover lesbian?

00:24:15.400 I don't know if that's,

00:24:16.600 is that true anymore?

00:24:17.560 Or do you have to throw in

00:24:18.420 gay and lesbian?

00:24:19.060 But anyway,

00:24:19.860 we have over half a million people

00:24:22.660 in the United States

00:24:24.140 who are married to the same sex.

00:24:27.240 Did it bother anybody?

00:24:30.240 Is there anybody who,

00:24:32.080 did you worse,

00:24:32.760 did your life get worse

00:24:33.780 in some way?

00:24:35.520 No.

00:24:36.500 No.

00:24:37.180 So it's very Republican,

00:24:38.680 and this is a compliment.

00:24:40.540 This is a compliment.

00:24:41.820 It's very Republican

00:24:42.800 to be concerned about change.

00:24:46.640 That's just a normal human reflex.

00:24:48.600 But once the change has happened

00:24:51.300 and you see it's no big deal,

00:24:53.520 if it doesn't affect you

00:24:54.660 and you're a Republican,

00:24:56.200 what do you think of it?

00:24:57.820 If it doesn't affect you

00:24:59.140 and somebody's just

00:24:59.940 living their life,

00:25:01.860 eh, right?

00:25:03.360 Eh, it's just not your problem.

00:25:05.700 So even the LGBTQ thing 1.00

00:25:08.640 doesn't really define Republicans

00:25:10.320 in the way it might have before.

00:25:12.960 It's very moving, yeah.

00:25:14.080 And Putin also rigs elections.

00:25:21.100 I don't know.

00:25:21.760 Who's that like?

00:25:23.880 Allegedly.

00:25:25.260 I don't know.

00:25:26.720 It's a tough one.

00:25:27.520 I can't figure it out.

00:25:29.500 All right.

00:25:29.900 But,

00:25:29.960 that tweet that I just talked about

00:25:35.540 in which I asked

00:25:36.440 if Putin is a Republican or a Democrat,

00:25:38.120 I saw some weird things

00:25:41.400 happening with it.

00:25:42.760 So there was a tweet

00:25:43.620 showing a little video

00:25:44.960 of what happens

00:25:45.840 when you try to look at the tweet.

00:25:47.840 And apparently the tweet shows up

00:25:49.780 and then immediately disappears

00:25:51.400 with a message

00:25:52.220 that there's something

00:25:53.980 limiting the comments.

00:25:56.640 Did you see that?

00:25:58.540 I don't know what that's about.

00:26:00.700 Do you?

00:26:01.980 Because I saw the video

00:26:03.220 and you can see

00:26:04.480 that the tweet will show up

00:26:05.660 and then disappear.

00:26:08.960 It says,

00:26:09.780 because you blocked the user.

00:26:13.060 But,

00:26:13.640 that doesn't explain

00:26:14.580 why it shows up

00:26:15.420 before it disappears.

00:26:20.220 So,

00:26:20.840 anyway,

00:26:21.600 it looked like it was,

00:26:22.640 it's because you blocked

00:26:25.500 those that QT it.

00:26:27.020 but blocking them

00:26:30.520 should not make them

00:26:32.020 show up

00:26:32.580 before they disappear.

00:26:34.380 They would just be gone.

00:26:35.960 Now,

00:26:36.180 and by the way,

00:26:36.700 I'm not talking about

00:26:37.360 my experience.

00:26:38.780 I'm talking about

00:26:39.620 other people's experience

00:26:40.940 from their own account.

00:26:43.340 Does that make a difference

00:26:44.420 to your answer?

00:26:45.260 People are saying

00:26:45.860 it's because I blocked

00:26:46.800 some users,

00:26:47.980 but I'm talking about

00:26:49.140 somebody who did not

00:26:50.180 block those users

00:26:51.060 looking at my account

00:26:53.800 and they can't see it.

00:26:57.680 It's a bug?

00:27:00.840 Somebody says,

00:27:02.000 you get that

00:27:02.520 when I retweet

00:27:03.980 Cernovich,

00:27:05.380 that you get that.

00:27:07.020 It flashed the tweet

00:27:07.980 and then disappeared.

00:27:17.500 Interesting.

00:27:19.560 So,

00:27:20.280 I don't know what that is.

00:27:21.460 I tagged Elon Musk

00:27:23.400 on the video

00:27:24.740 that shows some weird

00:27:25.680 things happening.

00:27:26.220 And just ask if it was normal.

00:27:28.020 Anyway,

00:27:28.640 keep an eye on that.

00:27:31.380 So,

00:27:31.860 you know how

00:27:32.260 we all started

00:27:33.660 using the word

00:27:34.300 Karen?

00:27:35.780 And you would call

00:27:36.540 somebody a Karen

00:27:37.320 if they asked

00:27:38.540 to speak to the manager?

00:27:40.500 Well,

00:27:41.040 there's no male version

00:27:42.200 of that,

00:27:42.580 right?

00:27:43.360 But I'm going to suggest

00:27:44.180 a male version of that.

00:27:46.000 And it's based

00:27:46.560 on this tweet.

00:27:48.260 And I noticed

00:27:49.100 a bunch of people

00:27:49.760 just when I tweeted

00:27:51.200 the thing about Putin,

00:27:52.500 a lot of people

00:27:53.200 did the

00:27:53.700 this guy tweet.

00:27:54.980 Do you know

00:27:56.100 what I mean?

00:27:57.140 Instead of dealing

00:27:57.980 with the content

00:27:58.720 of the tweet,

00:28:00.140 a lot of people

00:28:01.040 did the

00:28:01.640 this guy

00:28:02.820 doesn't,

00:28:04.020 this guy

00:28:04.540 showing you

00:28:05.020 he doesn't know

00:28:05.500 anything about Russia.

00:28:06.780 Or this guy

00:28:08.240 said some things

00:28:09.520 and then they

00:28:10.020 talk about some

00:28:10.960 fake news

00:28:11.460 about what they

00:28:12.260 think I said

00:28:12.740 about something

00:28:13.200 in the past.

00:28:13.780 everybody who

00:28:15.500 starts with

00:28:15.960 this guy

00:28:16.500 or a comment

00:28:18.080 about the

00:28:18.520 tweeter

00:28:18.840 with no comment

00:28:19.660 about the

00:28:20.080 content.

00:28:21.320 I said

00:28:21.860 in my tweet

00:28:22.640 when you see

00:28:23.120 people attack

00:28:23.720 the sender

00:28:24.300 of a tweet

00:28:24.720 instead of

00:28:25.140 the content

00:28:25.640 it tells you

00:28:26.660 two things

00:28:27.160 about the

00:28:27.540 attacker.

00:28:28.100 Number one

00:28:28.520 they have

00:28:29.300 no counter

00:28:29.820 argument

00:28:30.120 and number

00:28:30.700 two

00:28:30.980 they are

00:28:31.980 Keith Olbermann

00:28:32.840 usually.

00:28:34.560 Usually.

00:28:36.120 And so

00:28:36.700 I would suggest

00:28:37.560 and I've started

00:28:38.200 doing this already

00:28:38.960 I did it once

00:28:39.760 that when

00:28:40.960 somebody attacks

00:28:41.740 the messenger

00:28:42.600 instead of

00:28:43.260 the message

00:28:43.720 you just say

00:28:45.080 okay Keith

00:28:45.900 that should be

00:28:47.960 your comment

00:28:48.340 okay Keith

00:28:49.120 Keith Olbermann

00:28:50.680 you know

00:28:52.260 Keith Olbermann

00:28:52.920 right?

00:28:54.020 He's the one

00:28:54.440 who always

00:28:54.800 attacks the

00:28:55.300 messenger

00:28:55.640 he attacks me

00:28:56.980 all the time

00:28:57.660 well that's

00:28:58.780 an exaggeration

00:28:59.300 so Keith Olbermann

00:29:00.340 likes to

00:29:01.060 troll my account

00:29:02.720 and attack me

00:29:03.820 personally

00:29:04.240 he almost

00:29:05.500 never

00:29:05.900 I think

00:29:06.800 never

00:29:07.140 has attacked

00:29:08.520 anything I've

00:29:09.120 said

00:29:09.460 in terms of

00:29:10.860 content

00:29:11.280 he only

00:29:12.080 attacks me

00:29:12.680 so

00:29:14.740 he's a

00:29:15.680 Keith

00:29:15.920 so every

00:29:17.120 time you

00:29:17.420 see somebody

00:29:17.820 attack the

00:29:18.560 tweeter

00:29:19.220 and not the

00:29:19.780 message

00:29:20.120 that's a

00:29:20.560 Keith

00:29:20.780 okay Keith

00:29:21.640 there's

00:29:23.800 I saw a

00:29:24.220 Ukrainian tweet

00:29:25.040 so this is

00:29:25.640 obviously war

00:29:26.440 propaganda

00:29:26.960 this comes

00:29:28.220 from a

00:29:28.640 Ukraine source

00:29:29.560 and the

00:29:31.420 Ukraine source

00:29:32.120 said oil

00:29:32.740 and gas

00:29:33.200 are the only

00:29:33.580 things Moscow

00:29:34.280 exports

00:29:34.900 apart from

00:29:36.200 the war

00:29:36.700 when Europe

00:29:37.940 switches to

00:29:38.580 another supplier

00:29:39.240 it will not

00:29:39.900 return to it

00:29:40.640 regardless of

00:29:41.520 whether the

00:29:41.960 war ends

00:29:42.480 for the

00:29:43.960 world

00:29:44.240 is

00:29:44.580 for the

00:29:47.300 world

00:29:47.500 Russia is 0.79

00:29:47.980 an unpredictable

00:29:48.640 country

00:29:49.180 with no

00:29:49.980 possibility to

00:29:50.880 build long

00:29:51.520 term projects

00:29:52.540 what do you

00:29:54.120 think of that

00:29:54.640 is Ukraine

00:29:55.960 right that

00:29:57.160 once people

00:29:57.760 wean themselves

00:29:58.440 off of

00:29:58.980 Russia oil

00:29:59.600 that Russia 0.72

00:30:00.700 will have

00:30:01.320 nothing to

00:30:01.800 export

00:30:02.240 and therefore

00:30:03.600 they do

00:30:05.020 export some

00:30:05.580 other stuff

00:30:06.000 steel etc

00:30:06.680 but for the

00:30:07.540 most part

00:30:07.940 it's an

00:30:08.400 energy

00:30:08.740 economy

00:30:09.200 what's

00:30:11.220 going to

00:30:11.420 happen

00:30:11.620 then

00:30:11.900 well

00:30:14.140 remember

00:30:14.740 this is

00:30:15.160 a Ukraine

00:30:15.760 source

00:30:16.320 so it's

00:30:16.920 propaganda

00:30:17.460 by definition

00:30:18.220 and then

00:30:19.660 Andres

00:30:20.040 Backhaus

00:30:20.840 commented

00:30:21.900 and he

00:30:22.300 said that

00:30:22.780 China

00:30:23.880 and India

00:30:24.760 will not

00:30:25.280 want

00:30:25.600 dependence

00:30:26.240 on

00:30:27.560 their oil

00:30:29.200 so if

00:30:30.000 Russia

00:30:30.300 can't sell

00:30:30.880 to Europe

00:30:31.300 and although

00:30:33.000 they could

00:30:33.500 sell to

00:30:33.980 India

00:30:35.020 and China

00:30:35.780 China

00:30:36.180 and India

00:30:36.560 are not

00:30:36.880 going to

00:30:37.060 want to

00:30:37.260 be too

00:30:37.800 dependent

00:30:38.220 so they

00:30:39.320 don't want

00:30:39.840 to be

00:30:40.020 big

00:30:40.380 buyers

00:30:41.640 and oh

00:30:45.100 Peter Zan

00:30:45.680 says there's

00:30:46.260 no way

00:30:46.560 Russia will 0.98

00:30:47.140 be able to

00:30:47.580 reproduce the

00:30:48.540 same amount

00:30:49.180 of oil in

00:30:49.660 the future

00:30:50.060 because of

00:30:51.040 western

00:30:51.360 companies have

00:30:52.120 left

00:30:52.480 I don't know

00:30:53.720 I mean

00:30:54.820 maybe that

00:30:55.380 has a

00:30:56.600 there may be

00:30:57.740 a problem

00:30:58.680 getting parts

00:30:59.460 and supplies

00:31:00.020 but I don't

00:31:01.760 know if it's

00:31:02.180 just because

00:31:02.720 the western

00:31:03.200 oil companies

00:31:04.260 left

00:31:04.580 because I

00:31:05.420 feel like

00:31:05.900 they could

00:31:06.160 just take

00:31:06.520 over those

00:31:06.900 fields

00:31:07.240 so I

00:31:08.660 don't know

00:31:08.860 about that

00:31:09.340 but

00:31:10.220 I feel

00:31:13.180 as if

00:31:13.580 oil is

00:31:14.100 too

00:31:14.280 fungible

00:31:14.860 meaning

00:31:15.880 it all

00:31:16.740 looks the

00:31:17.100 same

00:31:17.320 and you

00:31:17.560 can sell

00:31:17.920 it

00:31:18.060 anywhere

00:31:18.380 actually

00:31:19.500 I don't

00:31:20.580 know if

00:31:20.860 Russian

00:31:21.120 Russian

00:31:21.640 oil is

00:31:22.000 good

00:31:22.200 stuff

00:31:22.560 right

00:31:22.760 is

00:31:22.980 Russian

00:31:23.240 oil

00:31:23.460 dirty

00:31:23.800 or

00:31:24.060 good

00:31:25.660 I can't

00:31:27.260 remember

00:31:27.560 is Russian

00:31:28.120 oil

00:31:28.500 as clean

00:31:30.880 as other

00:31:31.300 oil

00:31:31.560 it's good

00:31:34.040 right

00:31:34.300 mid-grade

00:31:35.340 to good

00:31:35.940 Saudi

00:31:38.400 oil is

00:31:38.880 the best

00:31:39.380 somebody

00:31:40.060 says

00:31:40.360 because there

00:31:41.000 is a

00:31:41.220 difference

00:31:41.520 in the

00:31:42.100 quality

00:31:42.420 of the

00:31:42.640 oil

00:31:42.840 I don't

00:31:43.900 know the

00:31:44.160 answer to

00:31:44.440 that

00:31:44.540 question

00:31:44.840 but here's

00:31:47.000 my take

00:31:47.440 I don't

00:31:47.760 think this

00:31:48.100 is true 0.89

00:31:48.440 I think

00:31:49.240 anybody

00:31:49.580 who produces

00:31:50.280 a commodity

00:31:51.880 that the

00:31:52.480 world needs

00:31:53.180 can just

00:31:54.000 find a way

00:31:54.500 to get it

00:31:54.900 there

00:31:55.100 how hard

00:31:56.340 would it

00:31:56.600 be for

00:31:57.300 North Korea

00:31:59.040 to say

00:31:59.800 no that's

00:32:00.540 a wrong

00:32:00.820 one

00:32:01.060 how hard

00:32:01.880 it would

00:32:02.060 be for

00:32:02.440 some

00:32:02.800 African

00:32:03.600 country

00:32:04.140 that has

00:32:05.040 no sanctions

00:32:05.660 against it

00:32:06.320 to buy

00:32:07.540 all the

00:32:07.820 oil

00:32:08.120 and use

00:32:08.880 some of

00:32:09.200 it

00:32:09.340 and sell

00:32:09.820 the

00:32:10.000 excess

00:32:10.420 I don't

00:32:12.000 know it

00:32:12.220 feels like

00:32:12.620 they could

00:32:12.900 just find

00:32:13.260 some middle

00:32:13.700 man

00:32:14.100 carve out

00:32:15.500 kind of

00:32:15.880 thing

00:32:16.140 it doesn't

00:32:18.220 yeah Nigeria

00:32:18.900 or something

00:32:19.320 it doesn't

00:32:19.940 seem like it

00:32:20.380 would be hard

00:32:20.820 for Russia

00:32:21.380 to find

00:32:21.860 new markets

00:32:22.640 it would

00:32:23.400 just take

00:32:23.720 a while

00:32:23.920 to work

00:32:24.180 it out

00:32:24.460 all right

00:32:26.100 that ladies 1.00

00:32:30.880 and gentlemen

00:32:31.380 seems to

00:32:33.180 be

00:32:33.500 the end

00:32:34.920 of the

00:32:35.140 content

00:32:35.460 have you

00:32:36.820 noticed

00:32:37.080 it's a slow

00:32:37.580 news day

00:32:38.020 somebody said

00:32:38.620 on locals

00:32:39.240 earlier

00:32:39.580 that there's

00:32:40.520 a strange

00:32:40.900 energy

00:32:41.360 in the

00:32:42.280 world

00:32:42.560 anybody else

00:32:44.080 feel that

00:32:44.560 do you feel

00:32:45.740 a strange

00:32:46.300 energy in

00:32:46.900 the world

00:32:47.240 the news

00:32:48.980 is a little

00:32:49.380 slow

00:32:49.800 isn't it

00:32:50.900 it's a

00:32:52.340 little bit

00:32:52.600 slow

00:32:52.920 so

00:32:54.500 doesn't it

00:32:55.400 feel like

00:32:55.720 something's

00:32:56.160 about to

00:32:56.540 drop

00:32:56.920 isn't this

00:33:00.280 what happens

00:33:00.900 when there's

00:33:01.540 something big

00:33:02.120 happening

00:33:02.500 now we had

00:33:04.080 some big

00:33:04.400 news

00:33:04.740 I mean

00:33:05.100 Ukraine's

00:33:06.260 big news

00:33:06.880 and stock

00:33:08.340 markets

00:33:08.680 big news

00:33:09.380 let me talk

00:33:11.220 about the

00:33:11.500 stock market

00:33:12.040 if you're

00:33:13.480 checking your

00:33:14.040 stocks every

00:33:14.640 day during

00:33:15.260 a downturn

00:33:16.660 like this

00:33:17.200 don't do

00:33:18.460 that

00:33:18.800 right

00:33:19.740 when the

00:33:20.620 market is

00:33:21.040 up

00:33:21.220 I check

00:33:21.780 my stocks

00:33:22.300 every day

00:33:22.820 because it

00:33:24.380 makes me feel

00:33:24.860 good

00:33:25.120 when the

00:33:25.960 market is

00:33:26.320 down

00:33:26.520 I never

00:33:26.880 look at

00:33:27.200 my stocks

00:33:27.680 so the

00:33:28.720 first thing

00:33:29.080 I do

00:33:29.320 is look

00:33:29.600 at the

00:33:29.800 market

00:33:30.100 and then

00:33:31.440 if the

00:33:31.860 market is

00:33:32.300 down

00:33:32.580 I don't

00:33:32.980 look at

00:33:33.240 my stocks

00:33:33.720 I do

00:33:34.080 not open

00:33:34.600 it

00:33:35.260 so

00:33:35.920 you know

00:33:37.360 my net

00:33:38.100 worth may

00:33:38.500 have gone

00:33:38.800 down

00:33:39.240 20%

00:33:40.680 or something

00:33:41.300 I don't

00:33:42.160 know

00:33:42.420 because I

00:33:44.380 assume it

00:33:44.740 will come

00:33:44.960 back

00:33:45.340 right

00:33:45.740 so if

00:33:46.700 you buy

00:33:46.960 stocks

00:33:47.340 you don't

00:33:47.660 want to be

00:33:47.980 thinking of

00:33:48.380 it in

00:33:48.800 same year

00:33:49.780 terms

00:33:50.320 you want

00:33:50.600 to be

00:33:50.780 thinking of

00:33:51.120 it in

00:33:51.400 five year

00:33:52.060 kind of

00:33:53.760 thing

00:33:53.960 so

00:33:55.240 you grit

00:33:58.820 your teeth

00:33:59.180 and buy

00:33:59.580 I do

00:33:59.980 think it's a

00:34:00.480 good buying

00:34:00.940 opportunity

00:34:01.420 I mean I

00:34:03.660 don't give

00:34:04.320 financial advice

00:34:05.480 so don't take

00:34:06.440 that as

00:34:06.780 financial advice

00:34:07.540 but if you had

00:34:08.800 to place a

00:34:09.520 big bet

00:34:10.100 on whether

00:34:11.400 this would be

00:34:11.920 a good time

00:34:12.440 to buy

00:34:12.900 stocks

00:34:13.460 it'd be a

00:34:15.220 pretty safe

00:34:15.920 bet

00:34:16.260 I think

00:34:17.840 relatively

00:34:20.300 speaking

00:34:20.760 right

00:34:21.140 now the

00:34:21.800 safety is

00:34:22.440 depending on

00:34:23.000 how long

00:34:23.380 you want

00:34:23.640 to wait

00:34:23.920 if you want

00:34:24.400 to wait

00:34:24.600 10 years

00:34:25.260 it's a

00:34:25.640 very safe

00:34:26.080 bet

00:34:26.360 if you want

00:34:27.640 to wait

00:34:27.880 two years

00:34:28.480 anything

00:34:30.240 could happen

00:34:30.720 in two

00:34:31.000 years

00:34:31.300 Tesla's

00:34:34.960 down 32%

00:34:36.020 since January

00:34:36.800 yeah

00:34:37.500 I think the

00:34:38.260 entire market

00:34:38.920 needed to

00:34:39.520 come down

00:34:39.980 so one

00:34:40.920 of the

00:34:41.080 things that

00:34:41.600 people who

00:34:42.240 don't study

00:34:42.780 economics

00:34:43.460 get wrong

00:34:44.300 is that

00:34:45.600 the market

00:34:46.160 was way

00:34:46.760 more dangerous

00:34:47.420 before

00:34:47.940 do you

00:34:49.020 understand that

00:34:49.640 the market

00:34:50.900 was in a

00:34:51.420 more dangerous

00:34:52.020 situation

00:34:52.560 before it

00:34:53.160 went down

00:34:53.540 does everybody

00:34:55.500 get that

00:34:55.980 we went

00:34:57.460 from a

00:34:57.820 dangerous

00:34:58.140 situation

00:34:58.620 to a

00:34:58.940 less

00:34:59.120 dangerous

00:34:59.520 situation

00:35:00.120 but the

00:35:01.060 news

00:35:01.420 reports

00:35:02.040 it the

00:35:02.320 opposite

00:35:02.660 yeah

00:35:03.800 it's a

00:35:04.240 correction

00:35:04.520 it's called

00:35:05.340 a correction

00:35:05.940 why is it

00:35:07.000 called a

00:35:07.320 correction

00:35:07.740 it's called

00:35:09.160 a correction

00:35:09.720 because it

00:35:10.240 was in

00:35:10.520 the wrong

00:35:10.860 place

00:35:11.360 and it

00:35:12.980 went from

00:35:13.280 the wrong

00:35:13.640 place

00:35:13.940 to the

00:35:14.220 right

00:35:14.400 place

00:35:14.660 that's

00:35:14.920 what a

00:35:15.140 correction

00:35:15.440 is

00:35:15.740 so when

00:35:17.000 you see

00:35:17.260 a correction

00:35:17.920 that's not

00:35:19.600 bad news

00:35:20.280 that is not

00:35:21.700 bad news

00:35:22.140 unless you

00:35:23.000 were planning

00:35:23.360 to sell

00:35:23.780 your stock

00:35:24.360 that year

00:35:25.540 then it's

00:35:25.940 really bad

00:35:26.380 news

00:35:26.640 but if

00:35:27.340 you're

00:35:27.540 buying

00:35:28.140 and holding

00:35:28.660 a correction

00:35:29.940 means the

00:35:30.480 market is

00:35:31.140 staying strong

00:35:32.560 and it's

00:35:33.340 acting the way

00:35:33.920 a market

00:35:34.320 should act

00:35:34.940 so the

00:35:36.120 people who

00:35:36.480 have

00:35:36.680 economics

00:35:37.800 backgrounds

00:35:38.440 see a

00:35:39.060 correction

00:35:39.400 and they

00:35:39.860 say

00:35:40.100 oh

00:35:40.820 buying

00:35:41.340 opportunity

00:35:41.840 that's it

00:35:44.260 that's why

00:35:45.120 you keep

00:35:45.460 cash

00:35:45.900 if you're

00:35:46.860 an investor

00:35:47.240 it pays

00:35:47.880 to keep

00:35:48.200 some cash

00:35:48.860 for this

00:35:49.860 reason

00:35:50.180 you know

00:35:51.380 I did

00:35:51.760 a bunch

00:35:52.720 of buying

00:35:53.140 during the

00:35:53.640 bottom of

00:35:54.120 the pandemic

00:35:54.700 best investments

00:35:56.600 I ever made

00:35:57.220 right

00:35:59.540 whoever buys

00:36:00.780 now is likely

00:36:01.640 to be happy

00:36:02.300 maybe not

00:36:03.560 in a year

00:36:04.080 but in 10

00:36:05.400 years they're

00:36:05.860 probably going to

00:36:06.280 be pretty happy

00:36:06.840 they bought

00:36:07.180 stocks today

00:36:07.920 all bad

00:36:08.880 all right

00:36:12.100 Pfizer documents

00:36:14.820 is there any

00:36:15.280 media coverage

00:36:15.960 no because

00:36:16.620 that was

00:36:17.280 fake news

00:36:17.920 do you all

00:36:20.280 know that the

00:36:20.760 Pfizer documents

00:36:21.820 with the

00:36:22.360 negative information

00:36:23.800 you all know

00:36:24.800 that was fake

00:36:25.360 news right

00:36:25.860 the reason

00:36:28.420 it's not being

00:36:28.920 talked about

00:36:29.460 now here's a

00:36:31.200 question

00:36:31.540 why have

00:36:32.920 you not

00:36:33.200 seen anything

00:36:33.640 about 2,000

00:36:34.540 mules

00:36:34.940 Dinesh D'Souza's

00:36:38.080 film about

00:36:39.080 alleged

00:36:40.120 improprieties

00:36:41.640 in the 2020

00:36:42.280 election

00:36:42.700 why have you

00:36:44.020 not seen it

00:36:44.640 on I guess

00:36:45.360 it's been

00:36:45.680 banned by

00:36:46.260 Newsmax

00:36:47.380 so Newsmax

00:36:48.840 isn't going

00:36:49.260 to cover it

00:36:49.760 and you

00:36:50.640 haven't seen

00:36:51.120 it on Fox

00:36:51.920 News

00:36:52.200 why not

00:36:54.600 why do you

00:36:57.080 think

00:36:57.400 it's being

00:36:58.900 suppressed

00:36:59.420 if in fact

00:37:01.680 that's being

00:37:02.060 suppressed

00:37:02.380 I don't

00:37:02.720 want to

00:37:02.980 lead the

00:37:03.340 witness

00:37:03.660 why do you

00:37:04.560 think you're

00:37:04.840 not seeing

00:37:05.160 it

00:37:05.780 Tucker

00:37:07.340 interviewed

00:37:07.760 them

00:37:08.060 is Tucker

00:37:08.740 the only

00:37:09.100 one who

00:37:09.360 talked to

00:37:09.740 because I

00:37:11.760 don't think

00:37:12.140 it really

00:37:12.460 gets covered

00:37:13.160 by most of

00:37:16.560 the opinion

00:37:16.920 people

00:37:17.320 well here

00:37:21.200 here would

00:37:22.620 be my

00:37:23.340 best take

00:37:25.480 on that

00:37:25.940 I think

00:37:27.540 it's just

00:37:27.880 too dangerous

00:37:28.580 because

00:37:30.120 if it

00:37:32.860 turns out

00:37:33.420 that it

00:37:35.140 doesn't hold

00:37:35.740 up

00:37:36.140 I don't

00:37:36.780 know if

00:37:37.040 it will

00:37:37.320 or not

00:37:37.760 but if

00:37:38.600 it turns

00:37:38.900 out that

00:37:39.340 the premise

00:37:40.580 doesn't hold

00:37:41.280 up

00:37:41.560 I don't

00:37:42.720 think any

00:37:43.120 major news

00:37:43.780 platform

00:37:44.260 wants to

00:37:44.700 be on

00:37:44.940 that side

00:37:45.520 and I

00:37:46.900 think that

00:37:47.340 unfortunately

00:37:47.820 D'Souza has

00:37:48.660 enough of a

00:37:49.460 history

00:37:49.920 that even

00:37:52.260 people who

00:37:52.820 would be

00:37:53.320 inclined to

00:37:54.380 be on

00:37:54.620 his side

00:37:55.120 are saying

00:37:56.280 well

00:37:56.680 he's a

00:37:58.580 little

00:37:58.700 dangerous

00:37:59.260 even if

00:38:00.560 you like

00:38:01.760 the topic

00:38:02.340 so it

00:38:03.180 might be

00:38:03.460 a little

00:38:03.700 bit too

00:38:05.740 much about

00:38:06.200 the maker

00:38:07.680 of the

00:38:08.040 film and

00:38:08.640 a little

00:38:08.840 less about

00:38:09.260 the content

00:38:09.920 maybe

00:38:10.500 so I

00:38:12.140 can't read

00:38:12.560 minds so I

00:38:13.460 do not

00:38:13.780 know

00:38:14.060 but

00:38:17.020 what is

00:38:18.620 the rule

00:38:19.420 that I

00:38:19.820 told you

00:38:20.340 about

00:38:20.800 identifying

00:38:21.720 fake news

00:38:22.420 that applies

00:38:22.960 to this

00:38:23.500 what is

00:38:25.100 the news

00:38:25.580 that applies

00:38:26.120 to this

00:38:26.680 so in

00:38:27.700 my book

00:38:28.040 loser

00:38:28.360 think

00:38:28.720 that you

00:38:29.400 see behind

00:38:29.840 me

00:38:30.020 I give

00:38:30.800 you some

00:38:31.260 techniques

00:38:32.660 for identifying

00:38:33.540 fake news

00:38:34.260 one of the

00:38:35.280 techniques

00:38:35.700 is this

00:38:36.380 if both

00:38:38.200 the news

00:38:38.680 on the

00:38:38.980 left

00:38:39.260 and the

00:38:39.600 right

00:38:39.900 say

00:38:40.940 the same

00:38:42.680 thing

00:38:43.060 it's

00:38:44.460 probably

00:38:44.720 true

00:38:45.020 right

00:38:46.800 so if

00:38:47.580 Fox News

00:38:48.060 says

00:38:48.300 something's

00:38:48.700 true

00:38:48.940 and CNN

00:38:49.460 says

00:38:49.820 something's

00:38:50.240 true

00:38:50.440 it's

00:38:50.680 probably

00:38:50.940 true

00:38:51.240 not

00:38:51.960 guaranteed

00:38:52.540 but

00:38:53.680 probably

00:38:54.180 and if

00:38:55.080 they

00:38:55.200 both

00:38:55.420 say

00:38:55.580 it's

00:38:55.720 not

00:38:55.940 true

00:38:56.180 it's

00:38:56.400 probably

00:38:56.600 not

00:38:56.820 true

00:38:57.040 not

00:38:58.220 guaranteed

00:38:58.780 but

00:38:59.540 probably

00:38:59.920 but in

00:39:01.280 this case

00:39:01.740 this is

00:39:02.140 sort of

00:39:02.420 a

00:39:02.520 hybrid

00:39:02.820 because

00:39:03.960 Fox News

00:39:04.560 is just

00:39:04.960 silent

00:39:05.300 on it

00:39:05.740 so nobody

00:39:07.420 is saying

00:39:07.780 it's

00:39:07.980 true

00:39:08.180 or not

00:39:08.520 true

00:39:08.780 it's

00:39:09.560 just

00:39:09.720 whether

00:39:09.960 it's

00:39:10.200 too

00:39:10.400 hot

00:39:10.840 a

00:39:11.000 potato

00:39:11.300 to

00:39:11.500 even

00:39:11.700 deal

00:39:11.940 with

00:39:12.200 so

00:39:12.820 that

00:39:13.200 rule

00:39:13.720 doesn't

00:39:14.020 work

00:39:14.260 in this

00:39:14.520 case

00:39:14.760 because

00:39:15.040 the

00:39:15.560 reason

00:39:15.880 they're

00:39:16.100 not

00:39:16.260 talking

00:39:16.560 about

00:39:16.780 it

00:39:16.880 is not

00:39:17.120 because

00:39:17.340 they say

00:39:17.680 it's

00:39:17.840 not

00:39:18.040 true

00:39:18.340 it seems

00:39:19.620 like

00:39:19.800 there's

00:39:19.980 not

00:39:20.180 an

00:39:20.320 opinion

00:39:20.540 on it

00:39:21.440 vaccine

00:39:23.340 deaths

00:39:23.780 is fake

00:39:24.200 news

00:39:24.600 as far

00:39:24.920 as I

00:39:25.180 know

00:39:25.420 I

00:39:28.100 think

00:39:28.680 the

00:39:28.900 problem

00:39:29.420 with

00:39:29.580 the

00:39:29.700 vaccine

00:39:30.120 deaths

00:39:30.520 is not

00:39:31.260 that

00:39:31.440 they

00:39:31.620 happen

00:39:32.020 or

00:39:32.380 don't

00:39:32.560 happen

00:39:32.860 because

00:39:33.060 every

00:39:33.260 vaccine

00:39:33.660 kills

00:39:33.960 people

00:39:34.260 the

00:39:35.180 question

00:39:35.540 is

00:39:35.820 it's

00:39:36.140 not

00:39:36.320 being

00:39:36.520 compared

00:39:40.400 to

00:39:40.640 get

00:39:40.760 COVID

00:39:41.060 so

00:39:42.340 typically

00:39:43.400 the

00:39:43.700 reason

00:39:43.980 that

00:39:44.180 people

00:39:44.400 get

00:39:44.600 concerned

00:39:45.120 about

00:39:45.520 the

00:39:45.980 numbers

00:39:46.340 of

00:39:46.600 vaccine

00:39:47.060 deaths

00:39:47.460 is

00:39:48.320 because

00:39:48.560 they

00:39:48.780 think

00:39:49.100 it's

00:39:49.440 compared

00:39:49.760 to

00:39:50.020 zero

00:39:50.340 like

00:39:51.260 the

00:39:52.220 choice

00:39:52.500 is

00:39:52.720 deaths

00:39:53.020 or

00:39:53.200 no

00:39:53.400 deaths

00:39:53.760 so

00:39:54.600 you

00:39:54.780 would

00:39:54.920 choose

00:39:55.160 no

00:39:55.400 deaths

00:39:55.740 but

00:39:56.340 the

00:39:56.480 choice

00:39:56.720 was

00:39:57.040 deaths

00:39:57.540 one

00:39:57.840 way

00:39:58.140 versus

00:39:59.200 deaths

00:39:59.600 another

00:39:59.920 way

00:40:00.180 that

00:40:00.740 was

00:40:00.920 the

00:40:01.060 choice

00:40:01.340 so

00:40:02.340 that's

00:40:03.020 why

00:40:03.140 you

00:40:03.260 can

00:40:03.360 be

00:40:03.540 fooled

00:40:03.800 by

00:40:04.020 the

00:40:04.300 vaccination

00:40:05.100 death

00:40:05.620 scare

00:40:06.240 it's

00:40:06.500 out of

00:40:06.760 context

00:40:07.220 and

00:40:09.160 then

00:40:09.440 there's

00:40:09.680 some

00:40:09.860 demographic

00:40:10.380 issues

00:40:10.960 there

00:40:11.220 of

00:40:11.480 course

00:40:11.720 those

00:40:12.100 are

00:40:12.200 real

00:40:12.400 could

00:40:14.560 Fox

00:40:14.920 and

00:40:15.080 CNN

00:40:15.360 be

00:40:15.640 merging

00:40:16.000 no

00:40:16.520 we're

00:40:23.640 waiting

00:40:23.880 for

00:40:24.100 50

00:40:24.500 intelligence

00:40:24.940 officials

00:40:25.980 to

00:40:26.800 denounce

00:40:27.280 2,000

00:40:27.780 mules

00:40:28.020 so you'll

00:40:28.380 know

00:40:28.500 it's

00:40:28.680 true

00:40:28.880 all

00:40:34.080 right

00:40:34.240 what if

00:40:37.860 Fox

00:40:38.200 is

00:40:38.480 controlled

00:40:38.940 opposition

00:40:39.540 you

00:40:41.540 know

00:40:41.820 I don't

00:40:43.180 know

00:40:43.340 I think

00:40:43.960 I've

00:40:44.180 spent

00:40:44.440 enough

00:40:44.880 time

00:40:45.300 interacting

00:40:45.960 with

00:40:46.240 Fox

00:40:46.620 news

00:40:46.820 people

00:40:47.160 that

00:40:47.400 I

00:40:47.540 would

00:40:47.660 know

00:40:47.920 if

00:40:48.920 they

00:40:49.120 thought

00:40:49.360 they

00:40:50.720 were

00:40:50.840 working

00:40:51.120 for

00:40:51.320 a

00:40:51.460 controlled

00:40:51.800 opposition

00:40:52.240 maybe

00:40:53.020 I'm

00:40:53.220 not

00:40:53.380 defining

00:40:53.820 the

00:40:54.060 term

00:40:54.280 right

00:40:54.580 but

00:40:55.940 there's

00:40:56.260 certainly

00:40:56.500 no

00:40:56.740 intention

00:40:57.280 to be

00:40:57.880 that

00:40:58.180 if

00:40:59.900 you're

00:41:00.080 saying

00:41:00.260 it's

00:41:00.440 accidentally

00:41:00.920 happening

00:41:01.400 that's

00:41:02.140 a

00:41:02.240 different

00:41:02.440 argument

00:41:02.880 can

00:41:09.300 you

00:41:09.500 can

00:41:09.880 somebody

00:41:10.080 ask me

00:41:10.420 a

00:41:10.540 question

00:41:10.780 there's

00:41:11.340 no

00:41:11.500 requirement

00:41:11.960 to get

00:41:12.420 the

00:41:13.240 booster

00:41:13.540 shots

00:41:13.960 for

00:41:14.180 normal

00:41:14.580 citizens

00:41:15.020 right

00:41:15.320 am I

00:41:16.520 right

00:41:16.680 about

00:41:16.860 that

00:41:17.140 if

00:41:18.160 you're

00:41:18.300 an

00:41:18.400 average

00:41:18.640 citizen

00:41:19.060 you

00:41:19.380 don't

00:41:19.560 need

00:41:19.740 to

00:41:19.860 get

00:41:20.040 the

00:41:20.420 third

00:41:22.100 and

00:41:22.320 fourth

00:41:22.540 booster

00:41:22.960 it's

00:41:24.020 only

00:41:24.180 the

00:41:24.360 military

00:41:24.820 and

00:41:25.140 maybe

00:41:25.320 some

00:41:25.620 medical

00:41:26.160 people

00:41:26.500 or

00:41:26.680 something

00:41:26.920 I

00:41:27.200 don't

00:41:27.300 know

00:41:27.960 all

00:41:28.920 right

00:41:29.000 so

00:41:29.140 we're

00:41:29.280 done

00:41:29.440 with

00:41:29.580 that

00:41:29.720 right

00:41:29.940 except

00:41:30.980 in

00:41:31.200 Canada

00:41:31.520 medical

00:41:35.760 workers

00:41:36.240 and

00:41:38.400 somebody

00:41:38.820 pointed

00:41:39.140 out

00:41:39.400 that

00:41:39.640 it

00:41:39.780 seems

00:41:39.940 like

00:41:40.140 all

00:41:40.320 the

00:41:40.440 people

00:41:40.660 who

00:41:40.860 say

00:41:41.060 they're

00:41:41.640 getting

00:41:41.840 COVID

00:41:42.240 are

00:41:43.160 vaccinated

00:41:43.840 and

00:41:44.140 boosted

00:41:44.620 but

00:41:44.940 I

00:41:45.020 think

00:41:45.160 that's

00:41:45.540 that

00:41:47.240 would

00:41:47.440 be

00:41:47.760 a

00:41:48.300 that

00:41:51.980 would

00:41:52.120 be

00:41:52.260 more

00:41:52.460 about

00:41:52.660 what

00:41:52.840 you

00:41:52.960 notice

00:41:53.460 because

00:41:54.740 when

00:41:54.960 people

00:41:55.200 do

00:41:55.400 a

00:41:55.520 tweet

00:41:55.760 oh

00:41:56.060 I

00:41:56.240 got

00:41:56.380 COVID

00:41:56.700 but

00:41:57.040 I'm

00:41:57.300 vaccinated

00:41:58.420 and

00:41:58.660 boosted

00:41:59.040 so

00:41:59.260 thank

00:41:59.580 goodness

00:41:59.940 I

00:42:01.520 think

00:42:01.740 you

00:42:01.880 see

00:42:02.160 those

00:42:02.580 but

00:42:03.320 you

00:42:03.440 don't

00:42:03.620 see

00:42:03.820 the

00:42:03.960 person

00:42:04.220 who

00:42:04.340 got

00:42:04.540 COVID

00:42:04.860 and

00:42:05.080 had

00:42:05.240 no

00:42:05.440 symptoms

00:42:05.820 and

00:42:06.080 didn't

00:42:06.380 say

00:42:06.560 anything

00:42:06.780 about

00:42:07.060 it

00:42:07.340 so

00:42:08.380 I

00:42:09.620 wouldn't

00:42:10.220 say

00:42:11.160 there's

00:42:11.360 any

00:42:11.540 correlation

00:42:11.920 with

00:42:12.420 the

00:42:12.580 vaccination

00:42:13.060 it's

00:42:13.560 all

00:42:13.700 anecdotal

00:42:14.280 they're

00:42:18.760 not

00:42:18.940 on a

00:42:19.220 ventilator

00:42:19.640 yeah

00:42:19.920 age

00:42:23.040 related

00:42:23.380 result

00:42:23.760 more

00:42:24.140 vax

00:42:24.500 people

00:42:24.860 are

00:42:25.140 also

00:42:25.420 older

00:42:25.840 that's

00:42:26.200 correct

00:42:26.620 all

00:42:31.900 right

00:42:32.100 yeah

00:42:37.140 and

00:42:37.420 apparently

00:42:37.880 the

00:42:38.300 experts

00:42:38.800 are now

00:42:39.160 looking at

00:42:39.580 people

00:42:39.780 who

00:42:39.940 never

00:42:40.200 got

00:42:40.540 COVID

00:42:40.940 to see

00:42:41.520 if they

00:42:41.760 have

00:42:41.900 something

00:42:42.220 in

00:42:42.440 common

00:42:42.780 besides

00:42:43.740 not

00:42:44.020 being

00:42:44.220 exposed

00:42:44.660 so

00:42:45.260 there

00:42:45.380 might

00:42:45.520 be

00:42:45.660 some

00:42:45.860 genetic

00:42:46.400 propensity

00:42:47.080 that

00:42:49.100 but

00:42:50.200 here's

00:42:50.740 what I

00:42:51.000 suspect

00:42:51.400 I

00:42:52.060 suspect

00:42:52.460 the

00:42:52.700 genetic

00:42:53.080 propensity

00:42:54.240 is

00:42:55.560 related

00:42:55.940 to

00:42:56.120 your

00:42:56.280 vitamin

00:42:56.540 D

00:42:56.760 level

00:42:57.080 so

00:42:58.740 if

00:42:58.900 you

00:42:59.000 checked

00:42:59.280 your

00:42:59.460 vitamin

00:42:59.740 D

00:42:59.940 you

00:43:00.040 probably

00:43:00.320 know

00:43:00.520 everything

00:43:00.840 you

00:43:00.980 needed

00:43:01.220 yeah

00:43:05.500 I did

00:43:05.800 I got

00:43:06.280 just so you

00:43:07.620 know

00:43:07.840 I did

00:43:08.860 the original

00:43:09.360 two shots

00:43:10.120 which were

00:43:10.820 essentially

00:43:11.560 considered

00:43:12.120 one shot

00:43:12.760 in effect

00:43:13.900 it was like

00:43:14.320 one shot

00:43:14.740 and I

00:43:15.660 did

00:43:15.820 not get

00:43:16.280 a third

00:43:16.740 or fourth

00:43:17.140 booster

00:43:17.520 have I

00:43:20.460 watched

00:43:20.700 the

00:43:20.860 2000

00:43:21.220 mules

00:43:21.560 movie

00:43:21.960 no

00:43:22.740 but I

00:43:23.440 have

00:43:23.620 I finally

00:43:24.200 have a

00:43:24.480 link

00:43:24.660 to it

00:43:25.020 so

00:43:25.300 I have

00:43:26.680 a link

00:43:26.920 I'll be

00:43:27.160 watching

00:43:27.440 that

00:43:27.660 so I

00:43:28.580 will be

00:43:29.060 doing a

00:43:30.660 little

00:43:30.760 traveling

00:43:31.260 this coming

00:43:31.740 week

00:43:32.040 so I

00:43:33.660 want to

00:43:33.840 give you

00:43:34.240 a little

00:43:34.920 heads up

00:43:35.400 there might

00:43:37.240 be one

00:43:37.700 day

00:43:37.980 and it

00:43:38.260 might be

00:43:38.580 tomorrow

00:43:39.020 I haven't

00:43:39.460 decided

00:43:39.860 in which

00:43:40.860 I might

00:43:41.240 be a

00:43:41.560 half hour

00:43:41.980 early

00:43:42.440 or I

00:43:43.820 might end

00:43:44.520 a little

00:43:46.200 shorter

00:43:46.560 so I'm

00:43:47.800 going to

00:43:47.920 do a

00:43:48.080 little

00:43:48.180 traveling

00:43:48.580 but

00:43:49.040 I do

00:43:53.120 expect

00:43:53.680 I think

00:43:54.380 I'll be

00:43:54.660 able to

00:43:54.920 do it

00:43:55.180 every day

00:43:55.700 maybe not

00:43:57.200 on the

00:43:57.440 way home

00:43:57.860 I'm not

00:43:58.160 sure

00:43:58.380 I'm

00:44:03.480 traveling

00:44:03.820 alone

00:44:04.380 so it's

00:44:07.060 actually a

00:44:07.440 business trip

00:44:07.940 business in

00:44:10.140 the sense

00:44:10.500 that I'm

00:44:10.800 just going

00:44:11.120 to go

00:44:11.340 somewhere

00:44:11.800 and write

00:44:13.600 because I've

00:44:14.220 got a

00:44:14.480 book

00:44:14.720 deal

00:44:15.940 and I

00:44:16.460 need to

00:44:16.800 be serious

00:44:17.620 about it

00:44:18.060 so I'm

00:44:18.500 just going

00:44:18.780 to take

00:44:19.020 a week

00:44:19.460 of

00:44:20.280 just being

00:44:22.300 completely

00:44:22.980 outside my

00:44:23.860 environment

00:44:24.240 and it's

00:44:25.340 just a

00:44:25.660 writer's

00:44:26.100 retreat

00:44:27.700 it's just

00:44:31.540 someplace

00:44:31.800 easy

00:44:32.140 don't worry

00:44:32.560 about it

00:44:33.160 I don't

00:44:34.220 know if

00:44:34.460 I'll tell

00:44:34.720 you where

00:44:34.960 I'm going

00:44:35.320 because

00:44:35.580 that's not

00:44:36.840 the important

00:44:37.260 part

00:44:37.600 somebody says

00:44:40.960 I love

00:44:41.300 traveling alone

00:44:42.100 most of

00:44:43.380 my traveling

00:44:43.860 has been

00:44:44.220 alone

00:44:44.600 because most

00:44:45.520 of it has

00:44:45.840 been for

00:44:46.140 business

00:44:46.560 so traveling

00:44:48.100 alone is

00:44:48.460 very comfortable

00:44:49.040 for me

00:44:49.580 but I don't

00:44:51.720 know if I

00:44:52.100 can last a

00:44:54.380 week without

00:44:54.960 human contact

00:44:55.880 it's going to

00:44:57.880 be kind

00:44:58.180 hard

00:44:58.520 but that's

00:45:00.500 why I

00:45:00.820 wanted to

00:45:01.180 be somewhere

00:45:02.300 where there

00:45:02.800 would be

00:45:03.060 other humans

00:45:03.800 in the

00:45:04.340 natural

00:45:04.680 environment

00:45:05.220 because I

00:45:06.220 need to be

00:45:07.260 around people

00:45:07.960 I just don't

00:45:08.880 necessarily need

00:45:09.500 to talk to

00:45:09.980 them

00:45:10.140 traveling with

00:45:19.940 kids

00:45:20.420 is not

00:45:21.560 really your

00:45:22.220 vacation

00:45:22.720 is it

00:45:23.220 how do you

00:45:25.180 think of it

00:45:25.680 when you do

00:45:26.820 a vacation

00:45:27.280 with children

00:45:27.940 that's the

00:45:29.320 children's

00:45:29.760 vacation

00:45:30.180 the parents

00:45:32.140 are just

00:45:32.400 working

00:45:32.780 right

00:45:33.060 because there's

00:45:33.760 so much

00:45:34.040 work to put

00:45:34.580 on the

00:45:34.820 vacation

00:45:35.200 and they

00:45:35.740 don't get

00:45:36.020 to enjoy

00:45:36.420 themselves

00:45:36.840 in the

00:45:37.720 usual way

00:45:38.260 now I

00:45:38.920 think there

00:45:39.200 could be

00:45:39.400 an exception

00:45:39.840 if families

00:45:41.140 travel together

00:45:42.000 then the

00:45:42.400 kids can get

00:45:42.980 busy with

00:45:43.400 each other

00:45:43.740 and the

00:45:44.020 adults can

00:45:44.540 do their

00:45:44.820 thing

00:45:45.060 but if

00:45:46.500 it's just

00:45:47.220 you and

00:45:47.560 your family

00:45:47.980 traveling

00:45:48.460 that's

00:45:49.800 basically

00:45:50.260 the kids

00:45:50.940 vacation

00:45:51.480 it's not

00:45:52.200 your vacation

00:45:52.840 come to

00:45:58.300 Miami and

00:45:58.860 I'll buy

00:45:59.140 you a 0.57

00:45:59.460 Coke

00:45:59.760 is that

00:46:01.580 with a

00:46:01.940 capital

00:46:02.620 C

00:46:03.100 I travel

00:46:06.740 with other

00:46:07.200 parents

00:46:07.640 yeah

00:46:12.460 all right

00:46:14.080 so that's

00:46:14.640 all for

00:46:14.860 now

00:46:15.120 and I

00:46:15.600 will

00:46:15.940 we should

00:46:17.760 have a

00:46:18.040 human zoo

00:46:18.680 okay

00:46:19.380 there's an

00:46:21.720 idea

00:46:22.000 all right

00:46:25.380 that's all

00:46:26.820 for today

00:46:27.120 I'm going to

00:46:27.400 keep it short

00:46:27.860 got a lot

00:46:28.980 to do

00:46:29.640 today

00:46:29.920 you go

00:46:31.000 out and

00:46:31.320 have the

00:46:31.640 greatest

00:46:31.900 day ever

00:46:32.460 will you

00:46:33.300 do that

00:46:33.700 I think

00:46:34.820 you will

00:46:35.120 and

00:46:36.380 I'll talk

00:46:37.560 to you

00:46:37.720 tomorrow

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 10, 2022

Episode 1739 Scott Adams： Would Putin Be A Democrat Or Republican If He Lived In The United States？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript