Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 10, 2022


Episode 1739 Scott Adams： Would Putin Be A Democrat Or Republican If He Lived In The United States？


Episode Stats

Length

46 minutes

Words per Minute

146.2494

Word Count

6,820

Sentence Count

322

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

14


Summary

A viral photo of Mark Zuckerberg taking a selfie with his staff fuels alien conspiracy theories, and a new discovery could change the future of energy production on Earth. Plus, a new poll that asks Americans who they think is winning the Ukraine war.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody. And are you lucky? Yeah, because you're here and everybody else isn't.
00:00:10.480 Well, you know. And if you're here, you are already participating on the upside, right?
00:00:18.320 It's one of the best things that will ever happen in the history of humanity. It's going to happen
00:00:23.960 right now, and you're part of it. And if you'd like to take it up to heretofore unknown levels,
00:00:28.620 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a gel or a glass, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:34.860 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:43.420 It's the dopamine hit of the day. You can feel your body start to respond even as I prepare.
00:00:49.440 As soon as you take this hit, this hit, yeah, a little bit of a dopamine spike, it might last you all day.
00:00:55.220 Go.
00:00:58.620 Oh, yeah.
00:01:04.620 Mm-mm-mm.
00:01:06.540 So did everybody see the viral photo of Mark Zuckerberg taking a selfie with his staff?
00:01:14.060 I guess the Internet's having a lot of fun with this.
00:01:16.320 The caption I thought was the funniest was, Zuckerberg, take your selfie just like the humans.
00:01:24.620 I don't know if you've seen this.
00:01:26.460 Just like the humans.
00:01:31.000 And there's another tweet from News 18.
00:01:36.280 It says, Mark Zuckerberg's soulless selfie with colleagues fuels alien theory once again.
00:01:42.760 The theory that Zuckerberg's an alien.
00:01:44.600 I don't know, it does look like a soulless selfie.
00:01:49.980 If anybody was ever an alien from the future, or actually a time traveler, you know, somebody who went back in time, it would have to be Zuckerberg.
00:02:01.900 Right?
00:02:03.680 Scott is overtired.
00:02:05.080 You're right.
00:02:06.140 You're right.
00:02:06.600 I am underslept and overtired.
00:02:09.360 But I'm going to try to take care of that this week.
00:02:11.500 Well, here's a new discovery that might change everything.
00:02:15.000 It turns out that there's a rare material that you need for a fusion.
00:02:18.500 And we didn't think we had much of it, because it exists mostly in space and on the moon.
00:02:24.580 And it's hard to get your raw materials from the moon.
00:02:26.700 It's hard to get it from China, much less the moon.
00:02:30.720 But apparently this thing called helium-3 is ten times more likely, or ten times more abundant on Earth than we thought.
00:02:38.640 So that's really good news for future cheap energy.
00:02:43.680 We're probably a number of years away from that.
00:02:45.620 But as you know, fusion is working now.
00:02:49.020 Where it has never worked in the past.
00:02:51.260 And by working, I mean they can create more energy than they use for the first time.
00:02:56.160 So now it's an engineering problem, and we will have fusion and the solution to everything.
00:03:02.100 Which is almost true.
00:03:04.220 If you had abundant, cheap energy, it would be very close to the solution of everything.
00:03:11.100 Everything.
00:03:11.600 Everything would be cheaper, better.
00:03:13.740 You'd have less climate problems.
00:03:15.960 You'd have just everything.
00:03:18.500 All right.
00:03:21.720 Rasmussen did a poll and asked American likely voters, who do they think is winning the war, the Russia-Ukraine situation.
00:03:29.080 And I was a little bit surprised at this answer.
00:03:33.700 15% won five, say that Russia is winning the war.
00:03:38.100 Only 15% of people polled think Russia is winning the war.
00:03:48.500 Now, is that because Russia is not winning the war?
00:03:52.080 Or is that because that's what the news told us?
00:03:55.140 Because I don't know how you could say they're not winning.
00:03:59.460 It's really just a question of how much expense they're willing to absorb and how much political and other capital they're willing to put in.
00:04:08.260 But I don't think you could necessarily tell anybody who's winning or losing at this point, can you?
00:04:14.100 Because like I say, it's going to be a tipping point situation.
00:04:17.560 One of the two sides will reach some kind of a tipping point.
00:04:20.300 But you never really know which one is the closest to the tipping point.
00:04:24.060 Not really.
00:04:24.800 It's too much fog of war.
00:04:25.860 So, 25% of respondees said that Ukraine is winning.
00:04:35.140 25%.
00:04:35.740 25%.
00:04:37.340 25%.
00:04:40.100 Say Ukraine, which has been completely destroyed, is winning the war.
00:04:47.700 Interesting.
00:04:49.600 25%.
00:04:50.240 42% say it's a stalemate.
00:04:52.740 Now, I, of course, fall into the maybe 25% this time.
00:05:00.660 Because I think I'm like the only person dumb enough to say in public, what if they win?
00:05:08.900 You know, for me, it's always been, you know, are you so sure Russia is going to win this thing?
00:05:14.860 And let me ask you, do you know anybody who's been talking about this publicly?
00:05:19.560 You know, anybody who does this for a living, so to speak?
00:05:23.400 Did anybody else say that Russia would have as hard a time as they're having?
00:05:27.860 Because I said it from the start.
00:05:30.000 In fact, I was predicting that they wouldn't even attack.
00:05:34.680 Because it seemed so obvious that we would be in the place where we are now.
00:05:38.500 To me, it looked obvious.
00:05:40.140 But, you know, what do I know?
00:05:41.640 Everything looks smart if you get one right.
00:05:44.400 If you guess right, then you're pretty sure it's because of your genius, not because you guessed right.
00:05:49.200 That's sort of what I'm feeling right now.
00:05:51.420 I think it was my great insight, not my luck.
00:05:55.140 But I was completely wrong that they wouldn't attack.
00:05:59.000 But I was completely right that Ukraine would surprise with high-tech weaponry.
00:06:04.900 And that the attack would not be easy, and here we are.
00:06:09.760 So, but I'm kind of amazed at the effect of the news.
00:06:15.320 The news has actually convinced people that Russia is losing the war.
00:06:19.500 And maybe they are, in some sense, or maybe they will.
00:06:24.180 But, hmm.
00:06:27.380 Then Rasmussen asked, likely, U.S. voters, should the U.S. be involved if there's a wider war in Europe?
00:06:35.200 46% said yes.
00:06:38.300 And 31% said no.
00:06:40.420 So, apparently, the U.S. has been properly primed.
00:06:43.680 Not completely.
00:06:45.160 You need to get that over 50%.
00:06:46.880 But the U.S. has been primed for a major world war.
00:06:51.640 And that the population is largely on board with World War III.
00:06:59.680 Do you see the impact of propaganda and fake news in this?
00:07:05.180 It feels like these opinions are completely assigned, right?
00:07:09.680 How long have I been saying that people don't come up with their own opinions?
00:07:13.580 Opinions are assigned.
00:07:14.600 You know, Democrats have their opinions assigned to them.
00:07:17.960 Republicans have their opinions assigned to them.
00:07:20.340 But then we think that we thought it out.
00:07:22.960 You know, after the fact, we say, I think I thought this through and came to this opinion.
00:07:26.860 No, you didn't.
00:07:28.020 It's not likely.
00:07:29.360 If you have the same opinion as your team, it was probably assigned.
00:07:33.800 If not this time, sometime in the past.
00:07:37.280 Oh, let me see this.
00:07:38.160 All right.
00:07:45.340 Here's some obvious-sounding fake news.
00:07:48.620 I'm going to say this is fake news because it sounds exactly like other fake news.
00:07:54.340 So, you know, there's this book by Mark Esper.
00:07:56.540 He had been Trump's, what was he, defense secretary?
00:08:01.580 And he says that Trump, when the Black Lives Matter protesters were surrounding the Capitol, I guess,
00:08:09.580 Trump asked, can't you shoot protesters in the leg or something?
00:08:13.980 And then Esper interpreted that as the president wanting the military to shoot people in the legs.
00:08:21.080 Now, what do we know about Trump's decision-making process?
00:08:27.720 Does this sound like real news or fake news?
00:08:30.760 Because I'm willing to accept that Trump said those words.
00:08:35.880 But is he interpreting this right?
00:08:38.620 Actually, I'm willing to accept he actually said those words.
00:08:41.340 You know why?
00:08:42.520 Because it's the way he treats every topic.
00:08:44.400 Everything we hear about him behind closed doors is he always tosses out a Republican idea just to see what happens.
00:08:56.120 So he tosses out an extreme idea that usually comes from some Republican, you know, person just to see what the response is.
00:09:04.920 So you don't think that there were some Republicans somewhere who were saying,
00:09:08.000 why don't you shoot the protesters in the leg?
00:09:09.880 Or maybe he was talking about rubber bullets.
00:09:12.160 Right, that context would be left out.
00:09:13.600 But even the rubber bullets is pretty extreme.
00:09:16.400 That's pretty extreme.
00:09:20.200 And so you heard him say that?
00:09:22.920 Yeah, but it sounds like the sort of thing that he says on every topic.
00:09:27.080 You know, could we use a nuke?
00:09:29.040 Should we shoot him in the leg?
00:09:31.200 You know, can we lob a missile into the cartels?
00:09:34.920 You see the pattern?
00:09:36.380 The pattern is he asks the question about the most extreme response.
00:09:40.880 And then as Esper's described, the Esper and I guess a few of the aides walked him back from the idea of using the military at all, all the way to not using the military.
00:09:53.980 And then Trump agreed.
00:09:56.000 Well, what is the problem if Trump throws out an extreme suggestion and then his advisors say, no, the extreme doesn't work, but we'll walk you back to what might work?
00:10:07.300 Isn't that exactly what you want?
00:10:10.740 Like, not even a little bit wrong?
00:10:14.560 Imagine if he had never even floated an idea that's the extreme version.
00:10:19.900 You have to float the extreme version, don't you?
00:10:22.700 That feels like good management to me.
00:10:25.460 You put out the extreme and then you make people argue for the middle ground.
00:10:29.400 Make them work for it.
00:10:31.100 He made them work for it, did he not?
00:10:34.780 I mean, I don't see how people are, like, oblivious to the fact that he made his advisors work to sell their opinion and that he bought it.
00:10:44.640 And then he bought it.
00:10:45.440 If you make your advisors work for it and then you accept their recommendation because you saw the work, okay.
00:10:53.180 Because apparently the way they talked him back was through a pretty rational, you know, cost-benefit analysis.
00:11:01.200 And then once he heard the cost-benefit analysis, he said, okay, we'll do that.
00:11:05.860 What the hell is the problem with that?
00:11:08.760 The problem is people telling other people internal conversations.
00:11:13.580 The problem is Esper.
00:11:15.440 This is a story about Esper being a bad person, meaning that he's talking about private deliberations, which included brainstorming.
00:11:25.580 If you're talking about a private brainstorming conversation in which the point of it is to throw out, you know, throw out all the ideas and just see what the reaction is.
00:11:36.660 And that's exactly what he was doing.
00:11:38.700 Threw out an idea and asked for a reaction.
00:11:40.460 If that stuff is what you're leaking, you're a fucking asshole, really.
00:11:46.260 That is just so low, in my opinion.
00:11:50.120 Because it's clearly an attempt to make it look like it was more of a serious idea than it was.
00:11:56.100 That's how you sell a book.
00:11:57.980 So he's basically throwing the president of the United States under a bus to sell a frickin' book.
00:12:03.620 Is that a patriot?
00:12:06.240 It doesn't sound like it.
00:12:08.000 It doesn't sound like a patriot.
00:12:09.920 And by the way, this has nothing to do with Trump or Republican or Democrat.
00:12:14.040 I would say exactly the same thing if we were talking about a Democrat.
00:12:18.140 Exactly the same thing.
00:12:19.660 If somebody is talking about the brainstorming conversations and trying to sell that out of context,
00:12:25.760 that's just weasel behavior.
00:12:27.420 That's just horrible behavior.
00:12:29.460 Such a jerk.
00:12:30.120 Anyway, apparently now we have fake news, of course, everywhere.
00:12:38.580 But now there's something called fake job acceptance,
00:12:42.600 where I guess the job market is so hot and so hard to get good employees these days
00:12:47.560 that the Wall Street Journal is reporting the incidence of so-called ghosting,
00:12:55.900 of accepting offers and then saying that you'll start and then not showing up is at a record high.
00:13:01.420 So people are accepting jobs and just not going because they get another job usually
00:13:07.240 or they change their mind.
00:13:09.080 They don't even bother calling.
00:13:11.280 Eh, I might be back on Monday, but then again I might not.
00:13:15.780 So I don't know what to say about this except everything is fake now.
00:13:24.940 You know, it's a fake news, fake, you know, you throw in your own fakes, whatever.
00:13:29.820 But now even fake job acceptance.
00:13:33.080 That's a new high.
00:13:34.540 I keep hearing about people with two jobs.
00:13:36.960 How many people do you know who are working remotely and have two complete jobs
00:13:42.560 and the employers don't know that they're working two jobs?
00:13:46.340 In the comments, do you know anybody personally?
00:13:49.940 Somebody says they know many people.
00:13:53.340 A bunch of yeses going by.
00:13:56.440 Yes.
00:13:57.800 Yes.
00:13:59.080 We fired one doing it.
00:14:00.720 They found somebody doing it and fired him.
00:14:03.080 Been thinking about it, giggling, what a great idea.
00:14:06.220 Yes, yes.
00:14:07.140 Apparently it's widespread.
00:14:09.200 It's pretty widespread.
00:14:10.240 So it doesn't matter how many no's we hear,
00:14:13.060 the fact that there are lots of people who say yes
00:14:15.220 tells me it's pretty widespread.
00:14:18.780 So I don't even know if that's a bad thing, is it?
00:14:22.200 Because think about a typical full-time employee.
00:14:26.140 Do you ever get more than 50% productivity out of an employee?
00:14:30.760 Not really.
00:14:32.080 Because it seems like after you do the important stuff,
00:14:35.320 everything else is a meeting or something less important.
00:14:38.980 I feel like you could do the important stuff for two different jobs
00:14:42.440 fairly easily if you skipped all the unimportant stuff,
00:14:46.980 like commuting.
00:14:48.340 I mean, imagine the people who are commuting 90 minutes a day.
00:14:51.660 If you gave me an extra 90 minutes and said,
00:14:55.000 look, you can bank the 90 minutes so you can use that for your second job,
00:14:59.840 but also we'll take, let's say we'll shave 20% off of your main job,
00:15:04.320 add that there.
00:15:06.280 Then you have almost enough to sell it to the new employer.
00:15:09.720 Almost enough time.
00:15:14.620 So you might see more of that.
00:15:17.860 Meanwhile, in international relations,
00:15:20.360 Finland is getting close to requesting joining NATO,
00:15:25.160 which would put a NATO member on Russia's border with an 800-mile border.
00:15:34.040 And apparently Finland has been using U.S. equipment for years,
00:15:37.200 so that's an easy transition to NATO.
00:15:40.320 And they have actually an unusually strong military.
00:15:44.140 Did you know that?
00:15:45.420 Apparently Finland has a really good military.
00:15:48.300 I guess you have to if you're on the border of Russia.
00:15:50.300 So what has Putin decided will be his attack on Finland?
00:15:57.140 Well, he's decided that the Finns are Nazis.
00:16:00.520 That's right.
00:16:01.880 So Putin basically has one strategy.
00:16:04.400 Well, if you don't like me, you're some kind of a Nazi.
00:16:06.860 And he can always make an argument for it.
00:16:08.920 So in this case, the argument is that Finland, I think,
00:16:11.740 fought with the Nazis.
00:16:14.300 So he's going to call Finland a bunch of Nazis.
00:16:16.400 Sweden is also considering joining Finland at some point,
00:16:20.840 and it seems like they'd have a good shot at it.
00:16:23.920 Now, this raises the question,
00:16:26.160 if the whole reason we're having a war with Ukraine
00:16:28.720 is because Ukraine was flirting with NATO,
00:16:32.260 why would we do more of it?
00:16:34.880 Why would we do more of the thing that caused the war?
00:16:37.860 Is it because we think Putin is so beaten down by this war
00:16:42.060 that we can just push him?
00:16:43.720 Because pushing Putin is what got us in the war, right?
00:16:48.880 Didn't we sort of push him into attacking Ukraine?
00:16:52.220 So are we going to push him into attacking Finland?
00:16:54.820 Or is he so beat up from Ukraine
00:16:57.920 that he wouldn't have the will to attack anybody else?
00:17:02.400 I don't know.
00:17:03.340 You know, I like the idea that was floated about,
00:17:05.540 I think Macron said it, and who was it?
00:17:08.960 Somebody else said it.
00:17:09.940 That there should be some other kind of organization
00:17:13.020 that's not called NATO.
00:17:15.240 So you could kind of weasel it.
00:17:17.700 And I think maybe Trump has suggested this.
00:17:19.860 I heard. I haven't heard him say it.
00:17:21.700 But the idea would be you'd have some kind of
00:17:24.860 protection association,
00:17:27.740 but you wouldn't call it NATO.
00:17:30.840 I don't know.
00:17:31.520 Does that buy you anything?
00:17:32.360 What do you say?
00:17:41.160 Google the Finnish prime ministers.
00:17:43.980 I know exactly what you're saying.
00:17:45.780 It turns out that the Finnish prime minister
00:17:48.920 is a woman who is attractive.
00:17:50.780 That's why you told me to Google it, right?
00:17:53.400 I saw the picture today,
00:17:55.320 and I thought,
00:17:56.600 that really looks like she got a,
00:17:58.160 she got kind of a political boost
00:18:00.200 by her appearance.
00:18:03.340 But yes,
00:18:04.320 they have an attractive prime minister,
00:18:06.180 apparently.
00:18:09.060 And that alone is reason enough
00:18:10.760 to put them in NATO, I say.
00:18:13.500 What do you think about this?
00:18:14.720 Let me ask you.
00:18:16.220 Wisdom of the crowd time.
00:18:18.180 Do you think it's a good idea
00:18:19.400 or a bad idea
00:18:20.160 for Finland to join NATO?
00:18:22.580 Go.
00:18:23.280 Good idea or bad idea
00:18:24.880 for Finland to join NATO?
00:18:26.480 All right.
00:18:28.200 I'll read your responses.
00:18:29.180 They always go by faster
00:18:30.620 on the locals' platform.
00:18:32.480 I'm seeing a mix.
00:18:34.100 More bad than good,
00:18:35.740 but definitely a mix.
00:18:37.200 Looks like 50-50?
00:18:39.960 60-40?
00:18:41.540 All right.
00:18:42.440 A lot of disagreement on this.
00:18:45.040 It's a good idea because of Ukraine.
00:18:47.520 Maybe.
00:18:48.400 Yeah, we don't really know, do we?
00:18:50.600 So if you don't know
00:18:51.660 if it's a good idea or a bad idea,
00:18:53.200 what do you do?
00:18:54.480 What do you do?
00:18:55.820 What do you do if you don't know,
00:18:57.520 if you legitimately don't know
00:18:58.940 if it's a good idea or a bad idea?
00:19:00.620 What do you do?
00:19:02.280 Do you do something or nothing?
00:19:05.240 If you don't know,
00:19:06.980 why would you spend money on it?
00:19:09.260 So here's a decision-making suggestion.
00:19:12.960 If you think it might make a big difference,
00:19:15.200 but it's sort of a toss-up,
00:19:17.040 one of them is very expensive
00:19:18.720 and one of them is not.
00:19:20.620 You would do the one that's less expensive
00:19:22.140 if you really, really didn't know the difference.
00:19:25.740 If you suspected there was a difference
00:19:27.720 and let's say your own security mattered,
00:19:33.000 then you might make a different decision.
00:19:36.600 All right.
00:19:37.700 Well, I don't know.
00:19:40.680 I don't know if it's going to happen.
00:19:42.600 I feel as if delaying it would make a difference
00:19:45.300 because you don't want to give Putin too much of a loss
00:19:51.300 or else he can't negotiate his way out of it, right?
00:19:54.620 You don't want it to be too embarrassing for Putin
00:19:57.240 while you also need to negotiate.
00:20:01.700 So that might make sense
00:20:02.840 to just put the Finland decision off.
00:20:05.540 Like, just don't put it in the current mix.
00:20:07.920 Just delay it a little bit.
00:20:09.980 Something like that.
00:20:10.620 All right.
00:20:12.300 So I provocatively tweeted the following question.
00:20:15.780 If Putin were president of America,
00:20:18.540 would he be a Democrat or Republican?
00:20:21.800 As you might not be surprised,
00:20:24.540 it got a lot of attention on Twitter.
00:20:27.380 So here are the things we know about Putin,
00:20:29.400 and we're going to try to decide
00:20:30.720 if he sounds more like a Democrat
00:20:32.300 or more like a Republican
00:20:33.680 if he were an American.
00:20:35.360 All right.
00:20:35.820 So here are some things we know about Putin.
00:20:38.140 He calls his opponents Nazis.
00:20:40.620 Okay.
00:20:43.140 Is that Republican or Democrat?
00:20:45.100 He censors speech.
00:20:48.040 Democrat or Republican.
00:20:50.280 He favors universal health care.
00:20:54.280 He creates lots of fake news.
00:20:58.460 He favors abortion, apparently,
00:21:00.580 because Russia has one of the highest rates
00:21:02.740 of abortion of any country.
00:21:04.580 Now, he is trying to get the abortion rate down,
00:21:06.420 but in terms of making it legal,
00:21:08.800 it's about as legal as you can get.
00:21:11.960 He puts protesters in jail,
00:21:14.940 and he favors, in Russia,
00:21:18.100 they have very strict background checks
00:21:19.620 for gun buyers.
00:21:20.520 You can buy a gun,
00:21:22.200 just like the United States,
00:21:23.800 but they're very strict
00:21:24.820 on your mental health background
00:21:27.060 and background checks.
00:21:28.900 So you can't buy a gun in Russia
00:21:31.360 unless there's a background,
00:21:32.440 full background check.
00:21:35.860 So does that sound more Democrat
00:21:38.040 or more Republican?
00:21:40.260 What do you think?
00:21:42.920 All right.
00:21:43.480 Obviously, I left down some things.
00:21:46.640 I'm just trying to get people riled up
00:21:49.000 because it's fun.
00:21:50.720 So here would be some arguments
00:21:52.140 that he is a Republican.
00:21:54.620 Putin likes a strong military,
00:21:57.560 but he didn't fund one, did he?
00:22:02.760 He wants a strong military,
00:22:04.440 but looks like he underspent.
00:22:07.620 Who says they want a strong military,
00:22:09.800 but they don't spend money to get one?
00:22:11.360 It sounds like a Democrat, doesn't it?
00:22:15.120 If he wanted a strong military,
00:22:16.900 and we saw evidence
00:22:17.720 that he had funded
00:22:18.500 a well-maintained, strong military,
00:22:21.160 then I would say,
00:22:22.160 oh, that sounds more Republican.
00:22:27.420 But it is a high percentage of GDP,
00:22:29.480 so that sounds a little more Republican that way.
00:22:32.980 All right.
00:22:33.200 How about Russia just a few years ago
00:22:38.420 passed an anti-gay marriage bill.
00:22:42.360 So marriage in Russia
00:22:43.900 is between a, quote,
00:22:45.380 man and a woman.
00:22:46.700 Got to put that in quotes these days.
00:22:49.000 That sounds more neither, right?
00:22:53.240 That's basically neither.
00:22:54.820 Because these days,
00:22:55.920 I was trying to think,
00:22:56.620 when is the last time you heard
00:22:57.720 a Republican complaining about gay marriage?
00:23:02.000 Let me ask you this.
00:23:03.020 I know you've heard it, of course,
00:23:04.640 but when was the last time?
00:23:08.280 The last time I heard any Republican
00:23:10.380 online, on Twitter,
00:23:13.420 personally,
00:23:15.100 complaining about gay marriage?
00:23:17.040 I haven't heard it in years.
00:23:20.800 Have you?
00:23:21.900 It's just a total don't care.
00:23:24.340 Now, the concern about gay marriage
00:23:26.080 is that it would have some impact
00:23:27.580 on your life,
00:23:29.800 yours, let's say, hypothetically,
00:23:31.220 if you were a heterosexual married couple.
00:23:34.720 So somehow you thought
00:23:35.680 it would affect you, right?
00:23:37.360 I mean, that was the whole reason
00:23:38.600 anybody would be opposed to it.
00:23:41.660 It would have some effect on you.
00:23:44.120 But did it?
00:23:45.420 Did it?
00:23:46.700 Is there any Republican who says,
00:23:48.300 ah, everything was good for me
00:23:50.160 and my family
00:23:50.740 until the gays could get married?
00:23:52.100 Like, you can always understand
00:23:55.900 why anybody would be afraid
00:23:57.320 of anything new,
00:23:59.540 no matter what it is, right?
00:24:01.020 We're just,
00:24:01.800 we have a reflex
00:24:02.580 to be afraid of something new.
00:24:04.280 So that makes sense.
00:24:05.640 But once you've done it,
00:24:07.920 and there are over
00:24:08.580 half a million gay couples
00:24:11.960 who are married,
00:24:14.180 does gay cover lesbian?
00:24:15.400 I don't know if that's,
00:24:16.600 is that true anymore?
00:24:17.560 Or do you have to throw in
00:24:18.420 gay and lesbian?
00:24:19.060 But anyway,
00:24:19.860 we have over half a million people
00:24:22.660 in the United States
00:24:24.140 who are married to the same sex.
00:24:27.240 Did it bother anybody?
00:24:30.240 Is there anybody who,
00:24:32.080 did you worse,
00:24:32.760 did your life get worse
00:24:33.780 in some way?
00:24:35.520 No.
00:24:36.500 No.
00:24:37.180 So it's very Republican,
00:24:38.680 and this is a compliment.
00:24:40.540 This is a compliment.
00:24:41.820 It's very Republican
00:24:42.800 to be concerned about change.
00:24:46.640 That's just a normal human reflex.
00:24:48.600 But once the change has happened
00:24:51.300 and you see it's no big deal,
00:24:53.520 if it doesn't affect you
00:24:54.660 and you're a Republican,
00:24:56.200 what do you think of it?
00:24:57.820 If it doesn't affect you
00:24:59.140 and somebody's just
00:24:59.940 living their life,
00:25:01.860 eh, right?
00:25:03.360 Eh, it's just not your problem.
00:25:05.700 So even the LGBTQ thing
00:25:08.640 doesn't really define Republicans
00:25:10.320 in the way it might have before.
00:25:12.960 It's very moving, yeah.
00:25:14.080 And Putin also rigs elections.
00:25:21.100 I don't know.
00:25:21.760 Who's that like?
00:25:23.880 Allegedly.
00:25:25.260 I don't know.
00:25:26.720 It's a tough one.
00:25:27.520 I can't figure it out.
00:25:29.500 All right.
00:25:29.900 But,
00:25:29.960 that tweet that I just talked about
00:25:35.540 in which I asked
00:25:36.440 if Putin is a Republican or a Democrat,
00:25:38.120 I saw some weird things
00:25:41.400 happening with it.
00:25:42.760 So there was a tweet
00:25:43.620 showing a little video
00:25:44.960 of what happens
00:25:45.840 when you try to look at the tweet.
00:25:47.840 And apparently the tweet shows up
00:25:49.780 and then immediately disappears
00:25:51.400 with a message
00:25:52.220 that there's something
00:25:53.980 limiting the comments.
00:25:56.640 Did you see that?
00:25:58.540 I don't know what that's about.
00:26:00.700 Do you?
00:26:01.980 Because I saw the video
00:26:03.220 and you can see
00:26:04.480 that the tweet will show up
00:26:05.660 and then disappear.
00:26:08.960 It says,
00:26:09.780 because you blocked the user.
00:26:13.060 But,
00:26:13.640 that doesn't explain
00:26:14.580 why it shows up
00:26:15.420 before it disappears.
00:26:20.220 So,
00:26:20.840 anyway,
00:26:21.600 it looked like it was,
00:26:22.640 it's because you blocked
00:26:25.500 those that QT it.
00:26:27.020 but blocking them
00:26:30.520 should not make them
00:26:32.020 show up
00:26:32.580 before they disappear.
00:26:34.380 They would just be gone.
00:26:35.960 Now,
00:26:36.180 and by the way,
00:26:36.700 I'm not talking about
00:26:37.360 my experience.
00:26:38.780 I'm talking about
00:26:39.620 other people's experience
00:26:40.940 from their own account.
00:26:43.340 Does that make a difference
00:26:44.420 to your answer?
00:26:45.260 People are saying
00:26:45.860 it's because I blocked
00:26:46.800 some users,
00:26:47.980 but I'm talking about
00:26:49.140 somebody who did not
00:26:50.180 block those users
00:26:51.060 looking at my account
00:26:53.800 and they can't see it.
00:26:57.680 It's a bug?
00:27:00.840 Somebody says,
00:27:02.000 you get that
00:27:02.520 when I retweet
00:27:03.980 Cernovich,
00:27:05.380 that you get that.
00:27:07.020 It flashed the tweet
00:27:07.980 and then disappeared.
00:27:17.500 Interesting.
00:27:19.560 So,
00:27:20.280 I don't know what that is.
00:27:21.460 I tagged Elon Musk
00:27:23.400 on the video
00:27:24.740 that shows some weird
00:27:25.680 things happening.
00:27:26.220 And just ask if it was normal.
00:27:28.020 Anyway,
00:27:28.640 keep an eye on that.
00:27:31.380 So,
00:27:31.860 you know how
00:27:32.260 we all started
00:27:33.660 using the word
00:27:34.300 Karen?
00:27:35.780 And you would call
00:27:36.540 somebody a Karen
00:27:37.320 if they asked
00:27:38.540 to speak to the manager?
00:27:40.500 Well,
00:27:41.040 there's no male version
00:27:42.200 of that,
00:27:42.580 right?
00:27:43.360 But I'm going to suggest
00:27:44.180 a male version of that.
00:27:46.000 And it's based
00:27:46.560 on this tweet.
00:27:48.260 And I noticed
00:27:49.100 a bunch of people
00:27:49.760 just when I tweeted
00:27:51.200 the thing about Putin,
00:27:52.500 a lot of people
00:27:53.200 did the
00:27:53.700 this guy tweet.
00:27:54.980 Do you know
00:27:56.100 what I mean?
00:27:57.140 Instead of dealing
00:27:57.980 with the content
00:27:58.720 of the tweet,
00:28:00.140 a lot of people
00:28:01.040 did the
00:28:01.640 this guy
00:28:02.820 doesn't,
00:28:04.020 this guy
00:28:04.540 showing you
00:28:05.020 he doesn't know
00:28:05.500 anything about Russia.
00:28:06.780 Or this guy
00:28:08.240 said some things
00:28:09.520 and then they
00:28:10.020 talk about some
00:28:10.960 fake news
00:28:11.460 about what they
00:28:12.260 think I said
00:28:12.740 about something
00:28:13.200 in the past.
00:28:13.780 everybody who
00:28:15.500 starts with
00:28:15.960 this guy
00:28:16.500 or a comment
00:28:18.080 about the
00:28:18.520 tweeter
00:28:18.840 with no comment
00:28:19.660 about the
00:28:20.080 content.
00:28:21.320 I said
00:28:21.860 in my tweet
00:28:22.640 when you see
00:28:23.120 people attack
00:28:23.720 the sender
00:28:24.300 of a tweet
00:28:24.720 instead of
00:28:25.140 the content
00:28:25.640 it tells you
00:28:26.660 two things
00:28:27.160 about the
00:28:27.540 attacker.
00:28:28.100 Number one
00:28:28.520 they have
00:28:29.300 no counter
00:28:29.820 argument
00:28:30.120 and number
00:28:30.700 two
00:28:30.980 they are
00:28:31.980 Keith Olbermann
00:28:32.840 usually.
00:28:34.560 Usually.
00:28:36.120 And so
00:28:36.700 I would suggest
00:28:37.560 and I've started
00:28:38.200 doing this already
00:28:38.960 I did it once
00:28:39.760 that when
00:28:40.960 somebody attacks
00:28:41.740 the messenger
00:28:42.600 instead of
00:28:43.260 the message
00:28:43.720 you just say
00:28:45.080 okay Keith
00:28:45.900 that should be
00:28:47.960 your comment
00:28:48.340 okay Keith
00:28:49.120 Keith Olbermann
00:28:50.680 you know
00:28:52.260 Keith Olbermann
00:28:52.920 right?
00:28:54.020 He's the one
00:28:54.440 who always
00:28:54.800 attacks the
00:28:55.300 messenger
00:28:55.640 he attacks me
00:28:56.980 all the time
00:28:57.660 well that's
00:28:58.780 an exaggeration
00:28:59.300 so Keith Olbermann
00:29:00.340 likes to
00:29:01.060 troll my account
00:29:02.720 and attack me
00:29:03.820 personally
00:29:04.240 he almost
00:29:05.500 never
00:29:05.900 I think
00:29:06.800 never
00:29:07.140 has attacked
00:29:08.520 anything I've
00:29:09.120 said
00:29:09.460 in terms of
00:29:10.860 content
00:29:11.280 he only
00:29:12.080 attacks me
00:29:12.680 so
00:29:14.740 he's a
00:29:15.680 Keith
00:29:15.920 so every
00:29:17.120 time you
00:29:17.420 see somebody
00:29:17.820 attack the
00:29:18.560 tweeter
00:29:19.220 and not the
00:29:19.780 message
00:29:20.120 that's a
00:29:20.560 Keith
00:29:20.780 okay Keith
00:29:21.640 there's
00:29:23.800 I saw a
00:29:24.220 Ukrainian tweet
00:29:25.040 so this is
00:29:25.640 obviously war
00:29:26.440 propaganda
00:29:26.960 this comes
00:29:28.220 from a
00:29:28.640 Ukraine source
00:29:29.560 and the
00:29:31.420 Ukraine source
00:29:32.120 said oil
00:29:32.740 and gas
00:29:33.200 are the only
00:29:33.580 things Moscow
00:29:34.280 exports
00:29:34.900 apart from
00:29:36.200 the war
00:29:36.700 when Europe
00:29:37.940 switches to
00:29:38.580 another supplier
00:29:39.240 it will not
00:29:39.900 return to it
00:29:40.640 regardless of
00:29:41.520 whether the
00:29:41.960 war ends
00:29:42.480 for the
00:29:43.960 world
00:29:44.240 is
00:29:44.580 for the
00:29:47.300 world
00:29:47.500 Russia is
00:29:47.980 an unpredictable
00:29:48.640 country
00:29:49.180 with no
00:29:49.980 possibility to
00:29:50.880 build long
00:29:51.520 term projects
00:29:52.540 what do you
00:29:54.120 think of that
00:29:54.640 is Ukraine
00:29:55.960 right that
00:29:57.160 once people
00:29:57.760 wean themselves
00:29:58.440 off of
00:29:58.980 Russia oil
00:29:59.600 that Russia
00:30:00.700 will have
00:30:01.320 nothing to
00:30:01.800 export
00:30:02.240 and therefore
00:30:03.600 they do
00:30:05.020 export some
00:30:05.580 other stuff
00:30:06.000 steel etc
00:30:06.680 but for the
00:30:07.540 most part
00:30:07.940 it's an
00:30:08.400 energy
00:30:08.740 economy
00:30:09.200 what's
00:30:11.220 going to
00:30:11.420 happen
00:30:11.620 then
00:30:11.900 well
00:30:14.140 remember
00:30:14.740 this is
00:30:15.160 a Ukraine
00:30:15.760 source
00:30:16.320 so it's
00:30:16.920 propaganda
00:30:17.460 by definition
00:30:18.220 and then
00:30:19.660 Andres
00:30:20.040 Backhaus
00:30:20.840 commented
00:30:21.900 and he
00:30:22.300 said that
00:30:22.780 China
00:30:23.880 and India
00:30:24.760 will not
00:30:25.280 want
00:30:25.600 dependence
00:30:26.240 on
00:30:27.560 their oil
00:30:29.200 so if
00:30:30.000 Russia
00:30:30.300 can't sell
00:30:30.880 to Europe
00:30:31.300 and although
00:30:33.000 they could
00:30:33.500 sell to
00:30:33.980 India
00:30:35.020 and China
00:30:35.780 China
00:30:36.180 and India
00:30:36.560 are not
00:30:36.880 going to
00:30:37.060 want to
00:30:37.260 be too
00:30:37.800 dependent
00:30:38.220 so they
00:30:39.320 don't want
00:30:39.840 to be
00:30:40.020 big
00:30:40.380 buyers
00:30:41.640 and oh
00:30:45.100 Peter Zan
00:30:45.680 says there's
00:30:46.260 no way
00:30:46.560 Russia will
00:30:47.140 be able to
00:30:47.580 reproduce the
00:30:48.540 same amount
00:30:49.180 of oil in
00:30:49.660 the future
00:30:50.060 because of
00:30:51.040 western
00:30:51.360 companies have
00:30:52.120 left
00:30:52.480 I don't know
00:30:53.720 I mean
00:30:54.820 maybe that
00:30:55.380 has a
00:30:56.600 there may be
00:30:57.740 a problem
00:30:58.680 getting parts
00:30:59.460 and supplies
00:31:00.020 but I don't
00:31:01.760 know if it's
00:31:02.180 just because
00:31:02.720 the western
00:31:03.200 oil companies
00:31:04.260 left
00:31:04.580 because I
00:31:05.420 feel like
00:31:05.900 they could
00:31:06.160 just take
00:31:06.520 over those
00:31:06.900 fields
00:31:07.240 so I
00:31:08.660 don't know
00:31:08.860 about that
00:31:09.340 but
00:31:10.220 I feel
00:31:13.180 as if
00:31:13.580 oil is
00:31:14.100 too
00:31:14.280 fungible
00:31:14.860 meaning
00:31:15.880 it all
00:31:16.740 looks the
00:31:17.100 same
00:31:17.320 and you
00:31:17.560 can sell
00:31:17.920 it
00:31:18.060 anywhere
00:31:18.380 actually
00:31:19.500 I don't
00:31:20.580 know if
00:31:20.860 Russian
00:31:21.120 Russian
00:31:21.640 oil is
00:31:22.000 good
00:31:22.200 stuff
00:31:22.560 right
00:31:22.760 is
00:31:22.980 Russian
00:31:23.240 oil
00:31:23.460 dirty
00:31:23.800 or
00:31:24.060 good
00:31:25.660 I can't
00:31:27.260 remember
00:31:27.560 is Russian
00:31:28.120 oil
00:31:28.500 as clean
00:31:30.880 as other
00:31:31.300 oil
00:31:31.560 it's good
00:31:34.040 right
00:31:34.300 mid-grade
00:31:35.340 to good
00:31:35.940 Saudi
00:31:38.400 oil is
00:31:38.880 the best
00:31:39.380 somebody
00:31:40.060 says
00:31:40.360 because there
00:31:41.000 is a
00:31:41.220 difference
00:31:41.520 in the
00:31:42.100 quality
00:31:42.420 of the
00:31:42.640 oil
00:31:42.840 I don't
00:31:43.900 know the
00:31:44.160 answer to
00:31:44.440 that
00:31:44.540 question
00:31:44.840 but here's
00:31:47.000 my take
00:31:47.440 I don't
00:31:47.760 think this
00:31:48.100 is true
00:31:48.440 I think
00:31:49.240 anybody
00:31:49.580 who produces
00:31:50.280 a commodity
00:31:51.880 that the
00:31:52.480 world needs
00:31:53.180 can just
00:31:54.000 find a way
00:31:54.500 to get it
00:31:54.900 there
00:31:55.100 how hard
00:31:56.340 would it
00:31:56.600 be for
00:31:57.300 North Korea
00:31:59.040 to say
00:31:59.800 no that's
00:32:00.540 a wrong
00:32:00.820 one
00:32:01.060 how hard
00:32:01.880 it would
00:32:02.060 be for
00:32:02.440 some
00:32:02.800 African
00:32:03.600 country
00:32:04.140 that has
00:32:05.040 no sanctions
00:32:05.660 against it
00:32:06.320 to buy
00:32:07.540 all the
00:32:07.820 oil
00:32:08.120 and use
00:32:08.880 some of
00:32:09.200 it
00:32:09.340 and sell
00:32:09.820 the
00:32:10.000 excess
00:32:10.420 I don't
00:32:12.000 know it
00:32:12.220 feels like
00:32:12.620 they could
00:32:12.900 just find
00:32:13.260 some middle
00:32:13.700 man
00:32:14.100 carve out
00:32:15.500 kind of
00:32:15.880 thing
00:32:16.140 it doesn't
00:32:18.220 yeah Nigeria
00:32:18.900 or something
00:32:19.320 it doesn't
00:32:19.940 seem like it
00:32:20.380 would be hard
00:32:20.820 for Russia
00:32:21.380 to find
00:32:21.860 new markets
00:32:22.640 it would
00:32:23.400 just take
00:32:23.720 a while
00:32:23.920 to work
00:32:24.180 it out
00:32:24.460 all right
00:32:26.100 that ladies
00:32:30.880 and gentlemen
00:32:31.380 seems to
00:32:33.180 be
00:32:33.500 the end
00:32:34.920 of the
00:32:35.140 content
00:32:35.460 have you
00:32:36.820 noticed
00:32:37.080 it's a slow
00:32:37.580 news day
00:32:38.020 somebody said
00:32:38.620 on locals
00:32:39.240 earlier
00:32:39.580 that there's
00:32:40.520 a strange
00:32:40.900 energy
00:32:41.360 in the
00:32:42.280 world
00:32:42.560 anybody else
00:32:44.080 feel that
00:32:44.560 do you feel
00:32:45.740 a strange
00:32:46.300 energy in
00:32:46.900 the world
00:32:47.240 the news
00:32:48.980 is a little
00:32:49.380 slow
00:32:49.800 isn't it
00:32:50.900 it's a
00:32:52.340 little bit
00:32:52.600 slow
00:32:52.920 so
00:32:54.500 doesn't it
00:32:55.400 feel like
00:32:55.720 something's
00:32:56.160 about to
00:32:56.540 drop
00:32:56.920 isn't this
00:33:00.280 what happens
00:33:00.900 when there's
00:33:01.540 something big
00:33:02.120 happening
00:33:02.500 now we had
00:33:04.080 some big
00:33:04.400 news
00:33:04.740 I mean
00:33:05.100 Ukraine's
00:33:06.260 big news
00:33:06.880 and stock
00:33:08.340 markets
00:33:08.680 big news
00:33:09.380 let me talk
00:33:11.220 about the
00:33:11.500 stock market
00:33:12.040 if you're
00:33:13.480 checking your
00:33:14.040 stocks every
00:33:14.640 day during
00:33:15.260 a downturn
00:33:16.660 like this
00:33:17.200 don't do
00:33:18.460 that
00:33:18.800 right
00:33:19.740 when the
00:33:20.620 market is
00:33:21.040 up
00:33:21.220 I check
00:33:21.780 my stocks
00:33:22.300 every day
00:33:22.820 because it
00:33:24.380 makes me feel
00:33:24.860 good
00:33:25.120 when the
00:33:25.960 market is
00:33:26.320 down
00:33:26.520 I never
00:33:26.880 look at
00:33:27.200 my stocks
00:33:27.680 so the
00:33:28.720 first thing
00:33:29.080 I do
00:33:29.320 is look
00:33:29.600 at the
00:33:29.800 market
00:33:30.100 and then
00:33:31.440 if the
00:33:31.860 market is
00:33:32.300 down
00:33:32.580 I don't
00:33:32.980 look at
00:33:33.240 my stocks
00:33:33.720 I do
00:33:34.080 not open
00:33:34.600 it
00:33:35.260 so
00:33:35.920 you know
00:33:37.360 my net
00:33:38.100 worth may
00:33:38.500 have gone
00:33:38.800 down
00:33:39.240 20%
00:33:40.680 or something
00:33:41.300 I don't
00:33:42.160 know
00:33:42.420 because I
00:33:44.380 assume it
00:33:44.740 will come
00:33:44.960 back
00:33:45.340 right
00:33:45.740 so if
00:33:46.700 you buy
00:33:46.960 stocks
00:33:47.340 you don't
00:33:47.660 want to be
00:33:47.980 thinking of
00:33:48.380 it in
00:33:48.800 same year
00:33:49.780 terms
00:33:50.320 you want
00:33:50.600 to be
00:33:50.780 thinking of
00:33:51.120 it in
00:33:51.400 five year
00:33:52.060 kind of
00:33:53.760 thing
00:33:53.960 so
00:33:55.240 you grit
00:33:58.820 your teeth
00:33:59.180 and buy
00:33:59.580 I do
00:33:59.980 think it's a
00:34:00.480 good buying
00:34:00.940 opportunity
00:34:01.420 I mean I
00:34:03.660 don't give
00:34:04.320 financial advice
00:34:05.480 so don't take
00:34:06.440 that as
00:34:06.780 financial advice
00:34:07.540 but if you had
00:34:08.800 to place a
00:34:09.520 big bet
00:34:10.100 on whether
00:34:11.400 this would be
00:34:11.920 a good time
00:34:12.440 to buy
00:34:12.900 stocks
00:34:13.460 it'd be a
00:34:15.220 pretty safe
00:34:15.920 bet
00:34:16.260 I think
00:34:17.840 relatively
00:34:20.300 speaking
00:34:20.760 right
00:34:21.140 now the
00:34:21.800 safety is
00:34:22.440 depending on
00:34:23.000 how long
00:34:23.380 you want
00:34:23.640 to wait
00:34:23.920 if you want
00:34:24.400 to wait
00:34:24.600 10 years
00:34:25.260 it's a
00:34:25.640 very safe
00:34:26.080 bet
00:34:26.360 if you want
00:34:27.640 to wait
00:34:27.880 two years
00:34:28.480 anything
00:34:30.240 could happen
00:34:30.720 in two
00:34:31.000 years
00:34:31.300 Tesla's
00:34:34.960 down 32%
00:34:36.020 since January
00:34:36.800 yeah
00:34:37.500 I think the
00:34:38.260 entire market
00:34:38.920 needed to
00:34:39.520 come down
00:34:39.980 so one
00:34:40.920 of the
00:34:41.080 things that
00:34:41.600 people who
00:34:42.240 don't study
00:34:42.780 economics
00:34:43.460 get wrong
00:34:44.300 is that
00:34:45.600 the market
00:34:46.160 was way
00:34:46.760 more dangerous
00:34:47.420 before
00:34:47.940 do you
00:34:49.020 understand that
00:34:49.640 the market
00:34:50.900 was in a
00:34:51.420 more dangerous
00:34:52.020 situation
00:34:52.560 before it
00:34:53.160 went down
00:34:53.540 does everybody
00:34:55.500 get that
00:34:55.980 we went
00:34:57.460 from a
00:34:57.820 dangerous
00:34:58.140 situation
00:34:58.620 to a
00:34:58.940 less
00:34:59.120 dangerous
00:34:59.520 situation
00:35:00.120 but the
00:35:01.060 news
00:35:01.420 reports
00:35:02.040 it the
00:35:02.320 opposite
00:35:02.660 yeah
00:35:03.800 it's a
00:35:04.240 correction
00:35:04.520 it's called
00:35:05.340 a correction
00:35:05.940 why is it
00:35:07.000 called a
00:35:07.320 correction
00:35:07.740 it's called
00:35:09.160 a correction
00:35:09.720 because it
00:35:10.240 was in
00:35:10.520 the wrong
00:35:10.860 place
00:35:11.360 and it
00:35:12.980 went from
00:35:13.280 the wrong
00:35:13.640 place
00:35:13.940 to the
00:35:14.220 right
00:35:14.400 place
00:35:14.660 that's
00:35:14.920 what a
00:35:15.140 correction
00:35:15.440 is
00:35:15.740 so when
00:35:17.000 you see
00:35:17.260 a correction
00:35:17.920 that's not
00:35:19.600 bad news
00:35:20.280 that is not
00:35:21.700 bad news
00:35:22.140 unless you
00:35:23.000 were planning
00:35:23.360 to sell
00:35:23.780 your stock
00:35:24.360 that year
00:35:25.540 then it's
00:35:25.940 really bad
00:35:26.380 news
00:35:26.640 but if
00:35:27.340 you're
00:35:27.540 buying
00:35:28.140 and holding
00:35:28.660 a correction
00:35:29.940 means the
00:35:30.480 market is
00:35:31.140 staying strong
00:35:32.560 and it's
00:35:33.340 acting the way
00:35:33.920 a market
00:35:34.320 should act
00:35:34.940 so the
00:35:36.120 people who
00:35:36.480 have
00:35:36.680 economics
00:35:37.800 backgrounds
00:35:38.440 see a
00:35:39.060 correction
00:35:39.400 and they
00:35:39.860 say
00:35:40.100 oh
00:35:40.820 buying
00:35:41.340 opportunity
00:35:41.840 that's it
00:35:44.260 that's why
00:35:45.120 you keep
00:35:45.460 cash
00:35:45.900 if you're
00:35:46.860 an investor
00:35:47.240 it pays
00:35:47.880 to keep
00:35:48.200 some cash
00:35:48.860 for this
00:35:49.860 reason
00:35:50.180 you know
00:35:51.380 I did
00:35:51.760 a bunch
00:35:52.720 of buying
00:35:53.140 during the
00:35:53.640 bottom of
00:35:54.120 the pandemic
00:35:54.700 best investments
00:35:56.600 I ever made
00:35:57.220 right
00:35:59.540 whoever buys
00:36:00.780 now is likely
00:36:01.640 to be happy
00:36:02.300 maybe not
00:36:03.560 in a year
00:36:04.080 but in 10
00:36:05.400 years they're
00:36:05.860 probably going to
00:36:06.280 be pretty happy
00:36:06.840 they bought
00:36:07.180 stocks today
00:36:07.920 all bad
00:36:08.880 all right
00:36:12.100 Pfizer documents
00:36:14.820 is there any
00:36:15.280 media coverage
00:36:15.960 no because
00:36:16.620 that was
00:36:17.280 fake news
00:36:17.920 do you all
00:36:20.280 know that the
00:36:20.760 Pfizer documents
00:36:21.820 with the
00:36:22.360 negative information
00:36:23.800 you all know
00:36:24.800 that was fake
00:36:25.360 news right
00:36:25.860 the reason
00:36:28.420 it's not being
00:36:28.920 talked about
00:36:29.460 now here's a
00:36:31.200 question
00:36:31.540 why have
00:36:32.920 you not
00:36:33.200 seen anything
00:36:33.640 about 2,000
00:36:34.540 mules
00:36:34.940 Dinesh D'Souza's
00:36:38.080 film about
00:36:39.080 alleged
00:36:40.120 improprieties
00:36:41.640 in the 2020
00:36:42.280 election
00:36:42.700 why have you
00:36:44.020 not seen it
00:36:44.640 on I guess
00:36:45.360 it's been
00:36:45.680 banned by
00:36:46.260 Newsmax
00:36:47.380 so Newsmax
00:36:48.840 isn't going
00:36:49.260 to cover it
00:36:49.760 and you
00:36:50.640 haven't seen
00:36:51.120 it on Fox
00:36:51.920 News
00:36:52.200 why not
00:36:54.600 why do you
00:36:57.080 think
00:36:57.400 it's being
00:36:58.900 suppressed
00:36:59.420 if in fact
00:37:01.680 that's being
00:37:02.060 suppressed
00:37:02.380 I don't
00:37:02.720 want to
00:37:02.980 lead the
00:37:03.340 witness
00:37:03.660 why do you
00:37:04.560 think you're
00:37:04.840 not seeing
00:37:05.160 it
00:37:05.780 Tucker
00:37:07.340 interviewed
00:37:07.760 them
00:37:08.060 is Tucker
00:37:08.740 the only
00:37:09.100 one who
00:37:09.360 talked to
00:37:09.740 because I
00:37:11.760 don't think
00:37:12.140 it really
00:37:12.460 gets covered
00:37:13.160 by most of
00:37:16.560 the opinion
00:37:16.920 people
00:37:17.320 well here
00:37:21.200 here would
00:37:22.620 be my
00:37:23.340 best take
00:37:25.480 on that
00:37:25.940 I think
00:37:27.540 it's just
00:37:27.880 too dangerous
00:37:28.580 because
00:37:30.120 if it
00:37:32.860 turns out
00:37:33.420 that it
00:37:35.140 doesn't hold
00:37:35.740 up
00:37:36.140 I don't
00:37:36.780 know if
00:37:37.040 it will
00:37:37.320 or not
00:37:37.760 but if
00:37:38.600 it turns
00:37:38.900 out that
00:37:39.340 the premise
00:37:40.580 doesn't hold
00:37:41.280 up
00:37:41.560 I don't
00:37:42.720 think any
00:37:43.120 major news
00:37:43.780 platform
00:37:44.260 wants to
00:37:44.700 be on
00:37:44.940 that side
00:37:45.520 and I
00:37:46.900 think that
00:37:47.340 unfortunately
00:37:47.820 D'Souza has
00:37:48.660 enough of a
00:37:49.460 history
00:37:49.920 that even
00:37:52.260 people who
00:37:52.820 would be
00:37:53.320 inclined to
00:37:54.380 be on
00:37:54.620 his side
00:37:55.120 are saying
00:37:56.280 well
00:37:56.680 he's a
00:37:58.580 little
00:37:58.700 dangerous
00:37:59.260 even if
00:38:00.560 you like
00:38:01.760 the topic
00:38:02.340 so it
00:38:03.180 might be
00:38:03.460 a little
00:38:03.700 bit too
00:38:05.740 much about
00:38:06.200 the maker
00:38:07.680 of the
00:38:08.040 film and
00:38:08.640 a little
00:38:08.840 less about
00:38:09.260 the content
00:38:09.920 maybe
00:38:10.500 so I
00:38:12.140 can't read
00:38:12.560 minds so I
00:38:13.460 do not
00:38:13.780 know
00:38:14.060 but
00:38:17.020 what is
00:38:18.620 the rule
00:38:19.420 that I
00:38:19.820 told you
00:38:20.340 about
00:38:20.800 identifying
00:38:21.720 fake news
00:38:22.420 that applies
00:38:22.960 to this
00:38:23.500 what is
00:38:25.100 the news
00:38:25.580 that applies
00:38:26.120 to this
00:38:26.680 so in
00:38:27.700 my book
00:38:28.040 loser
00:38:28.360 think
00:38:28.720 that you
00:38:29.400 see behind
00:38:29.840 me
00:38:30.020 I give
00:38:30.800 you some
00:38:31.260 techniques
00:38:32.660 for identifying
00:38:33.540 fake news
00:38:34.260 one of the
00:38:35.280 techniques
00:38:35.700 is this
00:38:36.380 if both
00:38:38.200 the news
00:38:38.680 on the
00:38:38.980 left
00:38:39.260 and the
00:38:39.600 right
00:38:39.900 say
00:38:40.940 the same
00:38:42.680 thing
00:38:43.060 it's
00:38:44.460 probably
00:38:44.720 true
00:38:45.020 right
00:38:46.800 so if
00:38:47.580 Fox News
00:38:48.060 says
00:38:48.300 something's
00:38:48.700 true
00:38:48.940 and CNN
00:38:49.460 says
00:38:49.820 something's
00:38:50.240 true
00:38:50.440 it's
00:38:50.680 probably
00:38:50.940 true
00:38:51.240 not
00:38:51.960 guaranteed
00:38:52.540 but
00:38:53.680 probably
00:38:54.180 and if
00:38:55.080 they
00:38:55.200 both
00:38:55.420 say
00:38:55.580 it's
00:38:55.720 not
00:38:55.940 true
00:38:56.180 it's
00:38:56.400 probably
00:38:56.600 not
00:38:56.820 true
00:38:57.040 not
00:38:58.220 guaranteed
00:38:58.780 but
00:38:59.540 probably
00:38:59.920 but in
00:39:01.280 this case
00:39:01.740 this is
00:39:02.140 sort of
00:39:02.420 a
00:39:02.520 hybrid
00:39:02.820 because
00:39:03.960 Fox News
00:39:04.560 is just
00:39:04.960 silent
00:39:05.300 on it
00:39:05.740 so nobody
00:39:07.420 is saying
00:39:07.780 it's
00:39:07.980 true
00:39:08.180 or not
00:39:08.520 true
00:39:08.780 it's
00:39:09.560 just
00:39:09.720 whether
00:39:09.960 it's
00:39:10.200 too
00:39:10.400 hot
00:39:10.840 a
00:39:11.000 potato
00:39:11.300 to
00:39:11.500 even
00:39:11.700 deal
00:39:11.940 with
00:39:12.200 so
00:39:12.820 that
00:39:13.200 rule
00:39:13.720 doesn't
00:39:14.020 work
00:39:14.260 in this
00:39:14.520 case
00:39:14.760 because
00:39:15.040 the
00:39:15.560 reason
00:39:15.880 they're
00:39:16.100 not
00:39:16.260 talking
00:39:16.560 about
00:39:16.780 it
00:39:16.880 is not
00:39:17.120 because
00:39:17.340 they say
00:39:17.680 it's
00:39:17.840 not
00:39:18.040 true
00:39:18.340 it seems
00:39:19.620 like
00:39:19.800 there's
00:39:19.980 not
00:39:20.180 an
00:39:20.320 opinion
00:39:20.540 on it
00:39:21.440 vaccine
00:39:23.340 deaths
00:39:23.780 is fake
00:39:24.200 news
00:39:24.600 as far
00:39:24.920 as I
00:39:25.180 know
00:39:25.420 I
00:39:28.100 think
00:39:28.680 the
00:39:28.900 problem
00:39:29.420 with
00:39:29.580 the
00:39:29.700 vaccine
00:39:30.120 deaths
00:39:30.520 is not
00:39:31.260 that
00:39:31.440 they
00:39:31.620 happen
00:39:32.020 or
00:39:32.380 don't
00:39:32.560 happen
00:39:32.860 because
00:39:33.060 every
00:39:33.260 vaccine
00:39:33.660 kills
00:39:33.960 people
00:39:34.260 the
00:39:35.180 question
00:39:35.540 is
00:39:35.820 it's
00:39:36.140 not
00:39:36.320 being
00:39:36.520 compared
00:39:40.400 to
00:39:40.640 get
00:39:40.760 COVID
00:39:41.060 so
00:39:42.340 typically
00:39:43.400 the
00:39:43.700 reason
00:39:43.980 that
00:39:44.180 people
00:39:44.400 get
00:39:44.600 concerned
00:39:45.120 about
00:39:45.520 the
00:39:45.980 numbers
00:39:46.340 of
00:39:46.600 vaccine
00:39:47.060 deaths
00:39:47.460 is
00:39:48.320 because
00:39:48.560 they
00:39:48.780 think
00:39:49.100 it's
00:39:49.440 compared
00:39:49.760 to
00:39:50.020 zero
00:39:50.340 like
00:39:51.260 the
00:39:52.220 choice
00:39:52.500 is
00:39:52.720 deaths
00:39:53.020 or
00:39:53.200 no
00:39:53.400 deaths
00:39:53.760 so
00:39:54.600 you
00:39:54.780 would
00:39:54.920 choose
00:39:55.160 no
00:39:55.400 deaths
00:39:55.740 but
00:39:56.340 the
00:39:56.480 choice
00:39:56.720 was
00:39:57.040 deaths
00:39:57.540 one
00:39:57.840 way
00:39:58.140 versus
00:39:59.200 deaths
00:39:59.600 another
00:39:59.920 way
00:40:00.180 that
00:40:00.740 was
00:40:00.920 the
00:40:01.060 choice
00:40:01.340 so
00:40:02.340 that's
00:40:03.020 why
00:40:03.140 you
00:40:03.260 can
00:40:03.360 be
00:40:03.540 fooled
00:40:03.800 by
00:40:04.020 the
00:40:04.300 vaccination
00:40:05.100 death
00:40:05.620 scare
00:40:06.240 it's
00:40:06.500 out of
00:40:06.760 context
00:40:07.220 and
00:40:09.160 then
00:40:09.440 there's
00:40:09.680 some
00:40:09.860 demographic
00:40:10.380 issues
00:40:10.960 there
00:40:11.220 of
00:40:11.480 course
00:40:11.720 those
00:40:12.100 are
00:40:12.200 real
00:40:12.400 could
00:40:14.560 Fox
00:40:14.920 and
00:40:15.080 CNN
00:40:15.360 be
00:40:15.640 merging
00:40:16.000 no
00:40:16.520 we're
00:40:23.640 waiting
00:40:23.880 for
00:40:24.100 50
00:40:24.500 intelligence
00:40:24.940 officials
00:40:25.980 to
00:40:26.800 denounce
00:40:27.280 2,000
00:40:27.780 mules
00:40:28.020 so you'll
00:40:28.380 know
00:40:28.500 it's
00:40:28.680 true
00:40:28.880 all
00:40:34.080 right
00:40:34.240 what if
00:40:37.860 Fox
00:40:38.200 is
00:40:38.480 controlled
00:40:38.940 opposition
00:40:39.540 you
00:40:41.540 know
00:40:41.820 I don't
00:40:43.180 know
00:40:43.340 I think
00:40:43.960 I've
00:40:44.180 spent
00:40:44.440 enough
00:40:44.880 time
00:40:45.300 interacting
00:40:45.960 with
00:40:46.240 Fox
00:40:46.620 news
00:40:46.820 people
00:40:47.160 that
00:40:47.400 I
00:40:47.540 would
00:40:47.660 know
00:40:47.920 if
00:40:48.920 they
00:40:49.120 thought
00:40:49.360 they
00:40:50.720 were
00:40:50.840 working
00:40:51.120 for
00:40:51.320 a
00:40:51.460 controlled
00:40:51.800 opposition
00:40:52.240 maybe
00:40:53.020 I'm
00:40:53.220 not
00:40:53.380 defining
00:40:53.820 the
00:40:54.060 term
00:40:54.280 right
00:40:54.580 but
00:40:55.940 there's
00:40:56.260 certainly
00:40:56.500 no
00:40:56.740 intention
00:40:57.280 to be
00:40:57.880 that
00:40:58.180 if
00:40:59.900 you're
00:41:00.080 saying
00:41:00.260 it's
00:41:00.440 accidentally
00:41:00.920 happening
00:41:01.400 that's
00:41:02.140 a
00:41:02.240 different
00:41:02.440 argument
00:41:02.880 can
00:41:09.300 you
00:41:09.500 can
00:41:09.880 somebody
00:41:10.080 ask me
00:41:10.420 a
00:41:10.540 question
00:41:10.780 there's
00:41:11.340 no
00:41:11.500 requirement
00:41:11.960 to get
00:41:12.420 the
00:41:13.240 booster
00:41:13.540 shots
00:41:13.960 for
00:41:14.180 normal
00:41:14.580 citizens
00:41:15.020 right
00:41:15.320 am I
00:41:16.520 right
00:41:16.680 about
00:41:16.860 that
00:41:17.140 if
00:41:18.160 you're
00:41:18.300 an
00:41:18.400 average
00:41:18.640 citizen
00:41:19.060 you
00:41:19.380 don't
00:41:19.560 need
00:41:19.740 to
00:41:19.860 get
00:41:20.040 the
00:41:20.420 third
00:41:22.100 and
00:41:22.320 fourth
00:41:22.540 booster
00:41:22.960 it's
00:41:24.020 only
00:41:24.180 the
00:41:24.360 military
00:41:24.820 and
00:41:25.140 maybe
00:41:25.320 some
00:41:25.620 medical
00:41:26.160 people
00:41:26.500 or
00:41:26.680 something
00:41:26.920 I
00:41:27.200 don't
00:41:27.300 know
00:41:27.960 all
00:41:28.920 right
00:41:29.000 so
00:41:29.140 we're
00:41:29.280 done
00:41:29.440 with
00:41:29.580 that
00:41:29.720 right
00:41:29.940 except
00:41:30.980 in
00:41:31.200 Canada
00:41:31.520 medical
00:41:35.760 workers
00:41:36.240 and
00:41:38.400 somebody
00:41:38.820 pointed
00:41:39.140 out
00:41:39.400 that
00:41:39.640 it
00:41:39.780 seems
00:41:39.940 like
00:41:40.140 all
00:41:40.320 the
00:41:40.440 people
00:41:40.660 who
00:41:40.860 say
00:41:41.060 they're
00:41:41.640 getting
00:41:41.840 COVID
00:41:42.240 are
00:41:43.160 vaccinated
00:41:43.840 and
00:41:44.140 boosted
00:41:44.620 but
00:41:44.940 I
00:41:45.020 think
00:41:45.160 that's
00:41:45.540 that
00:41:47.240 would
00:41:47.440 be
00:41:47.760 a
00:41:48.300 that
00:41:51.980 would
00:41:52.120 be
00:41:52.260 more
00:41:52.460 about
00:41:52.660 what
00:41:52.840 you
00:41:52.960 notice
00:41:53.460 because
00:41:54.740 when
00:41:54.960 people
00:41:55.200 do
00:41:55.400 a
00:41:55.520 tweet
00:41:55.760 oh
00:41:56.060 I
00:41:56.240 got
00:41:56.380 COVID
00:41:56.700 but
00:41:57.040 I'm
00:41:57.300 vaccinated
00:41:58.420 and
00:41:58.660 boosted
00:41:59.040 so
00:41:59.260 thank
00:41:59.580 goodness
00:41:59.940 I
00:42:01.520 think
00:42:01.740 you
00:42:01.880 see
00:42:02.160 those
00:42:02.580 but
00:42:03.320 you
00:42:03.440 don't
00:42:03.620 see
00:42:03.820 the
00:42:03.960 person
00:42:04.220 who
00:42:04.340 got
00:42:04.540 COVID
00:42:04.860 and
00:42:05.080 had
00:42:05.240 no
00:42:05.440 symptoms
00:42:05.820 and
00:42:06.080 didn't
00:42:06.380 say
00:42:06.560 anything
00:42:06.780 about
00:42:07.060 it
00:42:07.340 so
00:42:08.380 I
00:42:09.620 wouldn't
00:42:10.220 say
00:42:11.160 there's
00:42:11.360 any
00:42:11.540 correlation
00:42:11.920 with
00:42:12.420 the
00:42:12.580 vaccination
00:42:13.060 it's
00:42:13.560 all
00:42:13.700 anecdotal
00:42:14.280 they're
00:42:18.760 not
00:42:18.940 on a
00:42:19.220 ventilator
00:42:19.640 yeah
00:42:19.920 age
00:42:23.040 related
00:42:23.380 result
00:42:23.760 more
00:42:24.140 vax
00:42:24.500 people
00:42:24.860 are
00:42:25.140 also
00:42:25.420 older
00:42:25.840 that's
00:42:26.200 correct
00:42:26.620 all
00:42:31.900 right
00:42:32.100 yeah
00:42:37.140 and
00:42:37.420 apparently
00:42:37.880 the
00:42:38.300 experts
00:42:38.800 are now
00:42:39.160 looking at
00:42:39.580 people
00:42:39.780 who
00:42:39.940 never
00:42:40.200 got
00:42:40.540 COVID
00:42:40.940 to see
00:42:41.520 if they
00:42:41.760 have
00:42:41.900 something
00:42:42.220 in
00:42:42.440 common
00:42:42.780 besides
00:42:43.740 not
00:42:44.020 being
00:42:44.220 exposed
00:42:44.660 so
00:42:45.260 there
00:42:45.380 might
00:42:45.520 be
00:42:45.660 some
00:42:45.860 genetic
00:42:46.400 propensity
00:42:47.080 that
00:42:49.100 but
00:42:50.200 here's
00:42:50.740 what I
00:42:51.000 suspect
00:42:51.400 I
00:42:52.060 suspect
00:42:52.460 the
00:42:52.700 genetic
00:42:53.080 propensity
00:42:54.240 is
00:42:55.560 related
00:42:55.940 to
00:42:56.120 your
00:42:56.280 vitamin
00:42:56.540 D
00:42:56.760 level
00:42:57.080 so
00:42:58.740 if
00:42:58.900 you
00:42:59.000 checked
00:42:59.280 your
00:42:59.460 vitamin
00:42:59.740 D
00:42:59.940 you
00:43:00.040 probably
00:43:00.320 know
00:43:00.520 everything
00:43:00.840 you
00:43:00.980 needed
00:43:01.220 yeah
00:43:05.500 I did
00:43:05.800 I got
00:43:06.280 just so you
00:43:07.620 know
00:43:07.840 I did
00:43:08.860 the original
00:43:09.360 two shots
00:43:10.120 which were
00:43:10.820 essentially
00:43:11.560 considered
00:43:12.120 one shot
00:43:12.760 in effect
00:43:13.900 it was like
00:43:14.320 one shot
00:43:14.740 and I
00:43:15.660 did
00:43:15.820 not get
00:43:16.280 a third
00:43:16.740 or fourth
00:43:17.140 booster
00:43:17.520 have I
00:43:20.460 watched
00:43:20.700 the
00:43:20.860 2000
00:43:21.220 mules
00:43:21.560 movie
00:43:21.960 no
00:43:22.740 but I
00:43:23.440 have
00:43:23.620 I finally
00:43:24.200 have a
00:43:24.480 link
00:43:24.660 to it
00:43:25.020 so
00:43:25.300 I have
00:43:26.680 a link
00:43:26.920 I'll be
00:43:27.160 watching
00:43:27.440 that
00:43:27.660 so I
00:43:28.580 will be
00:43:29.060 doing a
00:43:30.660 little
00:43:30.760 traveling
00:43:31.260 this coming
00:43:31.740 week
00:43:32.040 so I
00:43:33.660 want to
00:43:33.840 give you
00:43:34.240 a little
00:43:34.920 heads up
00:43:35.400 there might
00:43:37.240 be one
00:43:37.700 day
00:43:37.980 and it
00:43:38.260 might be
00:43:38.580 tomorrow
00:43:39.020 I haven't
00:43:39.460 decided
00:43:39.860 in which
00:43:40.860 I might
00:43:41.240 be a
00:43:41.560 half hour
00:43:41.980 early
00:43:42.440 or I
00:43:43.820 might end
00:43:44.520 a little
00:43:46.200 shorter
00:43:46.560 so I'm
00:43:47.800 going to
00:43:47.920 do a
00:43:48.080 little
00:43:48.180 traveling
00:43:48.580 but
00:43:49.040 I do
00:43:53.120 expect
00:43:53.680 I think
00:43:54.380 I'll be
00:43:54.660 able to
00:43:54.920 do it
00:43:55.180 every day
00:43:55.700 maybe not
00:43:57.200 on the
00:43:57.440 way home
00:43:57.860 I'm not
00:43:58.160 sure
00:43:58.380 I'm
00:44:03.480 traveling
00:44:03.820 alone
00:44:04.380 so it's
00:44:07.060 actually a
00:44:07.440 business trip
00:44:07.940 business in
00:44:10.140 the sense
00:44:10.500 that I'm
00:44:10.800 just going
00:44:11.120 to go
00:44:11.340 somewhere
00:44:11.800 and write
00:44:13.600 because I've
00:44:14.220 got a
00:44:14.480 book
00:44:14.720 deal
00:44:15.940 and I
00:44:16.460 need to
00:44:16.800 be serious
00:44:17.620 about it
00:44:18.060 so I'm
00:44:18.500 just going
00:44:18.780 to take
00:44:19.020 a week
00:44:19.460 of
00:44:20.280 just being
00:44:22.300 completely
00:44:22.980 outside my
00:44:23.860 environment
00:44:24.240 and it's
00:44:25.340 just a
00:44:25.660 writer's
00:44:26.100 retreat
00:44:27.700 it's just
00:44:31.540 someplace
00:44:31.800 easy
00:44:32.140 don't worry
00:44:32.560 about it
00:44:33.160 I don't
00:44:34.220 know if
00:44:34.460 I'll tell
00:44:34.720 you where
00:44:34.960 I'm going
00:44:35.320 because
00:44:35.580 that's not
00:44:36.840 the important
00:44:37.260 part
00:44:37.600 somebody says
00:44:40.960 I love
00:44:41.300 traveling alone
00:44:42.100 most of
00:44:43.380 my traveling
00:44:43.860 has been
00:44:44.220 alone
00:44:44.600 because most
00:44:45.520 of it has
00:44:45.840 been for
00:44:46.140 business
00:44:46.560 so traveling
00:44:48.100 alone is
00:44:48.460 very comfortable
00:44:49.040 for me
00:44:49.580 but I don't
00:44:51.720 know if I
00:44:52.100 can last a
00:44:54.380 week without
00:44:54.960 human contact
00:44:55.880 it's going to
00:44:57.880 be kind
00:44:58.180 hard
00:44:58.520 but that's
00:45:00.500 why I
00:45:00.820 wanted to
00:45:01.180 be somewhere
00:45:02.300 where there
00:45:02.800 would be
00:45:03.060 other humans
00:45:03.800 in the
00:45:04.340 natural
00:45:04.680 environment
00:45:05.220 because I
00:45:06.220 need to be
00:45:07.260 around people
00:45:07.960 I just don't
00:45:08.880 necessarily need
00:45:09.500 to talk to
00:45:09.980 them
00:45:10.140 traveling with
00:45:19.940 kids
00:45:20.420 is not
00:45:21.560 really your
00:45:22.220 vacation
00:45:22.720 is it
00:45:23.220 how do you
00:45:25.180 think of it
00:45:25.680 when you do
00:45:26.820 a vacation
00:45:27.280 with children
00:45:27.940 that's the
00:45:29.320 children's
00:45:29.760 vacation
00:45:30.180 the parents
00:45:32.140 are just
00:45:32.400 working
00:45:32.780 right
00:45:33.060 because there's
00:45:33.760 so much
00:45:34.040 work to put
00:45:34.580 on the
00:45:34.820 vacation
00:45:35.200 and they
00:45:35.740 don't get
00:45:36.020 to enjoy
00:45:36.420 themselves
00:45:36.840 in the
00:45:37.720 usual way
00:45:38.260 now I
00:45:38.920 think there
00:45:39.200 could be
00:45:39.400 an exception
00:45:39.840 if families
00:45:41.140 travel together
00:45:42.000 then the
00:45:42.400 kids can get
00:45:42.980 busy with
00:45:43.400 each other
00:45:43.740 and the
00:45:44.020 adults can
00:45:44.540 do their
00:45:44.820 thing
00:45:45.060 but if
00:45:46.500 it's just
00:45:47.220 you and
00:45:47.560 your family
00:45:47.980 traveling
00:45:48.460 that's
00:45:49.800 basically
00:45:50.260 the kids
00:45:50.940 vacation
00:45:51.480 it's not
00:45:52.200 your vacation
00:45:52.840 come to
00:45:58.300 Miami and
00:45:58.860 I'll buy
00:45:59.140 you a
00:45:59.460 Coke
00:45:59.760 is that
00:46:01.580 with a
00:46:01.940 capital
00:46:02.620 C
00:46:03.100 I travel
00:46:06.740 with other
00:46:07.200 parents
00:46:07.640 yeah
00:46:12.460 all right
00:46:14.080 so that's
00:46:14.640 all for
00:46:14.860 now
00:46:15.120 and I
00:46:15.600 will
00:46:15.940 we should
00:46:17.760 have a
00:46:18.040 human zoo
00:46:18.680 okay
00:46:19.380 there's an
00:46:21.720 idea
00:46:22.000 all right
00:46:25.380 that's all
00:46:26.820 for today
00:46:27.120 I'm going to
00:46:27.400 keep it short
00:46:27.860 got a lot
00:46:28.980 to do
00:46:29.640 today
00:46:29.920 you go
00:46:31.000 out and
00:46:31.320 have the
00:46:31.640 greatest
00:46:31.900 day ever
00:46:32.460 will you
00:46:33.300 do that
00:46:33.700 I think
00:46:34.820 you will
00:46:35.120 and
00:46:36.380 I'll talk
00:46:37.560 to you
00:46:37.720 tomorrow