Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1750 Scott Adams： Biden's War On Babies, Musk Mandates And Hillary Gets Away With Everything

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:10.860 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I think we'd all agree that nothing has ever been better.

00:00:16.260 And if you'd like to take it up to a stratospheric, multidimensional level,

00:00:22.980 and I know you're the kind of people who do that, am I right?

00:00:26.760 Do you settle for ordinary? No. You wouldn't be here if you did.

00:00:32.900 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice, a canteen jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.280 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:44.940 And join me now, if you will, for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:48.780 It's the dopamine hit of the day with a hint of oxytocin.

00:00:52.680 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and wow, is it going to just set you free today.

00:00:58.920 Go!

00:01:07.000 Perfection.

00:01:09.460 I'll tell you, when you've been drinking crappy hotel coffee for a week,

00:01:14.080 the good stuff really tastes good, am I right?

00:01:18.560 How many of you have heard of the co-hanger test that's going around TikTok?

00:01:24.600 Has anybody heard of that?

00:01:27.020 Heard about it for the first time today.

00:01:28.640 No, it's not about abortion.

00:01:30.700 Stop it. Stop it.

00:01:32.960 No, there's a little test, which apparently is based on science,

00:01:36.700 in which you take a co-hanger that can stretch,

00:01:39.860 so it'd have to be the kind that stretches.

00:01:42.760 And you stretch the wide part, and you put it on your head,

00:01:46.640 and then once it's on your head,

00:01:48.480 it causes you to involuntarily turn to one side.

00:01:53.520 And people don't believe it's real, and they'll put it on their head,

00:01:56.080 and as soon as they put it on their head, it will go,

00:01:57.760 and they'll be like, what?

00:02:00.920 So I was planning to do the challenge for you live,

00:02:04.880 but I thought to myself,

00:02:07.820 I think I'd better test this before I do it on live,

00:02:11.660 although it'd be funnier if it failed live.

00:02:13.960 So I found myself the only co-hanger I could find

00:02:18.220 that would bend in this house, because I have mostly wooden ones,

00:02:21.220 and I stretched it, and I put it on my head,

00:02:25.260 and now I'm told that 98% of people

00:02:28.500 will experience this head turn,

00:02:30.600 but apparently I'm in the top 2% again,

00:02:35.260 or the bottom 2%, depending on your perspective,

00:02:38.260 because I didn't feel anything,

00:02:39.880 and then I thought, is this a prank?

00:02:43.080 This isn't even real, is it?

00:02:45.980 I don't know.

00:02:47.180 It sounded like a prank,

00:02:48.760 because am I in the 2%?

00:02:53.100 I mean, did somebody actually get me

00:02:54.580 to put a co-hanger on my head?

00:02:56.720 I feel like I got pranked,

00:02:58.660 but if anybody's tried it, let me know.

00:03:01.140 I might try a different co-hanger just to find out.

00:03:05.260 I heard an argument

00:03:06.320 that was a good counter to my argument,

00:03:10.280 and you like it when I'm wrong, don't you?

00:03:13.520 Or at least you like it when I point out

00:03:15.240 that there's an argument that's better than my argument.

00:03:18.000 Now, I don't know if it's better,

00:03:19.700 but I had not heard it before,

00:03:22.300 and it had to do with my argument

00:03:24.500 that logically,

00:03:27.340 if we knew that the amount of initial viral load

00:03:30.740 made a difference to your outcomes,

00:03:33.080 that masks would at least work that well,

00:03:35.920 even if everybody got infected,

00:03:38.260 some people would get less of a severe outcome,

00:03:41.280 because maybe the mask

00:03:42.260 prevented some of the load

00:03:44.220 from going in your face.

00:03:47.000 Well, Anatoly Lubarsky

00:03:48.560 had a counter to that argument,

00:03:50.040 which I don't know if it's right,

00:03:53.080 but I consider it well-worthy enough to repeat.

00:03:56.920 So this is attacking my own argument.

00:03:59.560 Everybody ready for this?

00:04:01.320 I will now dismantle my own argument.

00:04:03.760 It goes like this.

00:04:05.400 If it's true that the amount of initial virus

00:04:07.980 makes a big difference to outcomes,

00:04:10.340 we probably would have seen it in the data, right?

00:04:12.760 So this is the first question,

00:04:14.580 and I don't think we did.

00:04:15.580 So at the macro level,

00:04:18.140 it doesn't look like there's any big difference.

00:04:20.700 If there's a difference,

00:04:22.260 maybe somebody's teasing it out with statistics,

00:04:25.420 but it's not big enough

00:04:26.700 to warrant the mandates, in my opinion,

00:04:30.780 because it didn't look like it made a difference

00:04:32.280 at any macro level.

00:04:34.740 But I still argued

00:04:36.480 that logically it had to make a difference

00:04:39.300 if we knew this fact,

00:04:41.420 if we knew that the initial dose

00:04:44.040 made a difference.

00:04:46.600 And then Anatoly adds this argument.

00:04:49.240 He says that the viruses

00:04:50.380 essentially replicate in a logarithmic way,

00:04:55.380 meaning really, really quickly,

00:04:58.080 such that the difference of,

00:04:59.800 you know, a few hours or something,

00:05:03.460 over a few hours,

00:05:05.240 you would end up being at maximum virus

00:05:07.920 no matter what.

00:05:09.000 So that the amount of difference

00:05:11.900 between getting a small virus

00:05:13.480 and then it instantly replicates

00:05:15.820 to a huge level

00:05:17.120 versus getting a larger dose

00:05:19.400 in the first place,

00:05:20.880 and then it also replicates

00:05:22.720 to its highest level,

00:05:24.040 there's not much difference in timing.

00:05:26.900 How about that?

00:05:28.780 Now, I would say

00:05:30.680 that's at least worthy of putting on,

00:05:34.740 that's at least equal to my hypothesis.

00:05:37.560 It's at least equal.

00:05:41.080 Hey, Alexa, cancel.

00:05:44.740 I hate it when my devices wake up

00:05:46.740 and start talking to me.

00:05:49.520 How about that?

00:05:50.820 Would you accept that

00:05:52.540 as a reasonable debunk

00:05:54.220 of my opinion,

00:05:55.840 which I've held for now two years?

00:05:59.100 Reasonable or no?

00:06:01.040 It's reasonable enough

00:06:02.740 to make me rethink my position.

00:06:05.720 That's all.

00:06:07.880 I definitely would rethink it.

00:06:10.360 But we'll see.

00:06:11.620 All right, a little update

00:06:12.960 on the Amber Turd trial.

00:06:15.280 I saw somebody call her Scamber.

00:06:17.640 Scamber Turd.

00:06:19.240 That's maybe an upgrade.

00:06:20.680 I don't know.

00:06:21.820 But apparently her own witnesses

00:06:24.120 haven't been so good for her.

00:06:26.860 And it looks like

00:06:28.160 she has proven that

00:06:29.980 she was the abuser.

00:06:31.220 So if you look at social media,

00:06:34.720 social media seems to have decided

00:06:36.700 that Amber Heard was the abuser.

00:06:39.380 What do you think of that?

00:06:41.440 Now, that doesn't mean

00:06:42.180 the trial will go that way.

00:06:43.380 But social media seems to have decided

00:06:45.140 that she's the abuser.

00:06:48.740 Now, let me tell you something

00:06:50.440 about her alleged personality type.

00:06:54.420 She's in that cluster two

00:06:57.080 or category two,

00:06:58.380 whatever it is, personality,

00:06:59.660 according to one expert testimony.

00:07:04.040 If you're in that cluster B category,

00:07:07.840 what is one thing you can know

00:07:09.380 about them for sure?

00:07:11.520 Now, you don't know

00:07:12.260 if they did a specific crime.

00:07:14.280 But what is one thing you can know about?

00:07:16.420 Yeah, that's right.

00:07:17.700 Not only do they lie,

00:07:20.340 here's the key.

00:07:21.880 Not only do they lie,

00:07:23.880 they lie about everything.

00:07:26.620 See, that's the thing

00:07:27.360 people don't get.

00:07:29.160 If I told you,

00:07:30.260 oh, Amber Heard has a personality type

00:07:32.000 where she would be a liar,

00:07:33.860 you say to yourself,

00:07:34.760 well, but she's going to save that,

00:07:36.820 she'll save that lie

00:07:38.080 for the important stuff, right?

00:07:39.460 She's not going to lie

00:07:40.380 about just everything all the time.

00:07:43.120 Nope.

00:07:44.160 Nope.

00:07:44.980 That personality type

00:07:46.320 lies about everything all the time

00:07:47.860 to the point where it's unbelievable.

00:07:49.880 It's like you can't even believe it.

00:07:52.380 Even when there's no purpose to it,

00:07:54.700 there's no point to it,

00:07:55.940 there's nothing gained,

00:07:57.340 just wall-to-wall lying about everything.

00:08:01.540 Now, what happens when you take somebody

00:08:03.200 who's a wall-to-wall liar

00:08:04.600 and they can't stop?

00:08:07.760 They literally can't stop.

00:08:09.500 That's what the personality type is.

00:08:11.120 They can't stop lying.

00:08:12.720 And then you put them on trial.

00:08:14.280 And you put them under oath.

00:08:17.500 And then you have people

00:08:18.520 who are witnesses

00:08:19.200 to the various things come on.

00:08:20.800 What's going to happen?

00:08:22.600 Well, what's going to happen

00:08:23.480 is what happened to Amber Heard.

00:08:25.580 Amber Turd.

00:08:28.040 So there were claims such as,

00:08:30.460 you know,

00:08:30.860 one day he broke her nose.

00:08:33.500 And then the defense for,

00:08:35.620 or whatever it is,

00:08:36.720 the attorney for Johnny Depp

00:08:38.540 shows a photo of her

00:08:41.640 on the red carpet

00:08:42.380 the next day looking perfect.

00:08:45.300 And her claim is that

00:08:46.660 he broke her nose.

00:08:51.380 And then there was one other example

00:08:53.840 where it was just as equally obvious

00:08:55.740 that she lied.

00:08:57.820 And I think Johnny Depp

00:09:01.000 is going to win.

00:09:02.520 I think he's going to win.

00:09:04.360 I don't know.

00:09:05.920 So we'll see.

00:09:06.660 But I feel like

00:09:08.980 there's something important

00:09:09.820 happening here

00:09:10.420 because people are learning

00:09:11.360 for the first time

00:09:12.200 that such people exist.

00:09:15.160 How many of you

00:09:16.040 have said to yourself,

00:09:18.080 oh my God,

00:09:18.840 I know somebody

00:09:19.860 who's married to an Amber Heard.

00:09:22.180 Or maybe you were.

00:09:24.560 How many of you said,

00:09:25.960 oh my God, I know her.

00:09:27.600 And I had some,

00:09:28.880 yeah, look at that.

00:09:30.860 My sisters are Heard.

00:09:33.400 Yes.

00:09:33.920 It is a personality type

00:09:37.660 of which there are so many of them.

00:09:40.620 And the problem is

00:09:41.560 that you imagine

00:09:42.520 they're normal

00:09:43.940 and they're not.

00:09:46.920 The people in this personality type

00:09:48.560 are closer to monsters

00:09:51.000 with human DNA

00:09:52.160 than they are with,

00:09:53.240 like, just people.

00:09:54.680 Because they're there to destroy.

00:09:56.660 The average person

00:09:57.800 is there to help out.

00:09:58.760 That's our most natural impulse

00:10:02.440 is you put us in a situation

00:10:04.380 and we'll be like,

00:10:05.020 oh, how can I help?

00:10:06.200 I'll help the tribe,

00:10:07.140 help the family.

00:10:08.200 We're basically

00:10:08.800 a helpful species.

00:10:10.880 But the,

00:10:11.840 that cluster B types

00:10:14.400 are super selfish.

00:10:17.380 So selfish

00:10:18.300 that you can't even,

00:10:19.460 you know, imagine.

00:10:20.920 Like, selfish on a scale

00:10:22.540 that's mind-boggling.

00:10:23.940 And now you know

00:10:26.380 that they're real.

00:10:27.760 And there are lots of them.

00:10:31.060 All right.

00:10:33.840 Richard Grinnell

00:10:34.860 was tweeting

00:10:36.400 about the Pennsylvania vote,

00:10:37.840 which apparently

00:10:38.240 is still not completed.

00:10:40.860 And he said,

00:10:41.780 so this is the

00:10:42.820 Dr. Oz thing, right?

00:10:47.100 So they're still counting votes

00:10:48.340 and he tweets,

00:10:49.540 Pennsylvania voting

00:10:50.300 is totally broken.

00:10:51.620 It doesn't take this long

00:10:52.940 to count.

00:10:53.940 Why are people

00:10:54.840 so silent about this?

00:10:57.720 Isn't it because

00:10:58.480 we've been too beaten up

00:10:59.600 about it?

00:11:00.780 Is that why?

00:11:01.480 Or is it because

00:11:02.000 social media is

00:11:03.000 censoring it

00:11:04.640 in some way

00:11:05.120 we don't know?

00:11:06.760 But I,

00:11:07.680 I did my usual

00:11:08.820 asshole tweet.

00:11:10.260 Whenever I see anything

00:11:11.560 about the election

00:11:12.540 integrity,

00:11:14.520 I,

00:11:15.760 I say something

00:11:16.560 like this.

00:11:17.560 Reminder.

00:11:18.440 So I retweeted

00:11:19.700 Richard Grinnell's tweet.

00:11:21.300 As a reminder,

00:11:22.220 every previously

00:11:22.980 trusted institution

00:11:24.040 in America

00:11:24.740 has been proven corrupt.

00:11:27.040 Except

00:11:27.520 for all 50 states

00:11:29.980 running independent

00:11:30.740 election systems

00:11:31.580 in different ways

00:11:32.260 with different people.

00:11:33.800 Those are fine.

00:11:35.700 So stop asking questions.

00:11:41.620 Really?

00:11:42.920 Really?

00:11:44.260 Yeah.

00:11:44.740 So if you really want

00:11:47.280 to mock

00:11:48.340 reality,

00:11:51.060 try agreeing with it.

00:11:52.960 But agreeing with it

00:11:53.880 really hard.

00:11:54.620 Because that's what I just did.

00:11:56.060 Yes, it's true.

00:11:57.400 Every institution

00:11:58.220 has been proven corrupt

00:11:59.480 except for all 50 states

00:12:01.340 run by different people

00:12:02.380 in different ways.

00:12:03.560 They all nailed it.

00:12:05.360 But wow,

00:12:06.500 pretty big coincidence,

00:12:07.580 isn't it?

00:12:08.460 Yeah.

00:12:08.760 Try saying that

00:12:11.180 to somebody

00:12:11.640 who is absolutely

00:12:12.520 positive the election

00:12:13.560 was appropriate.

00:12:16.080 Just say what I said

00:12:17.120 and watch their reaction.

00:12:19.460 Do you know

00:12:19.800 what they can say

00:12:20.480 to that

00:12:20.800 as a counter to that?

00:12:24.320 Allow me

00:12:25.020 to give you

00:12:25.760 a play

00:12:26.580 in one act.

00:12:29.260 This would be me

00:12:30.260 at a party

00:12:31.640 in which we imagine

00:12:32.480 I drink cocktails

00:12:33.400 which I don't.

00:12:34.660 Here I am

00:12:35.020 with my imaginary cocktail.

00:12:36.140 And a person says to me,

00:12:39.260 oh, that election was fine.

00:12:40.840 The 2020 election was fine.

00:12:42.700 There were no problems.

00:12:43.520 To which I say,

00:12:44.800 yeah, yeah,

00:12:45.480 there were no problems.

00:12:46.520 And that's really incredible.

00:12:49.060 And we should be so lucky

00:12:50.380 because every single institution

00:12:52.380 in America

00:12:52.840 has been shown

00:12:53.540 to be corrupt

00:12:54.160 in the last few years

00:12:55.080 from our intelligence agencies

00:12:57.080 to Congress

00:12:58.120 to the medical

00:12:59.800 and scientific community.

00:13:01.360 Really,

00:13:01.800 every single entity

00:13:03.540 has been shown

00:13:05.020 to be corrupt

00:13:05.680 and even the Democrats,

00:13:07.280 it looks like

00:13:07.700 they ran a giant

00:13:09.000 Russia collusion hoax

00:13:10.420 and they worked

00:13:11.500 with the media.

00:13:12.380 So yeah,

00:13:12.780 every single entity

00:13:13.960 from Congress

00:13:15.480 to the media

00:13:16.140 through science

00:13:17.000 to the FBI

00:13:18.280 and the CIA

00:13:19.340 intel agencies,

00:13:20.960 100% of them

00:13:22.020 are corrupt

00:13:22.660 and we know that.

00:13:23.920 That's beyond question

00:13:24.800 at this point.

00:13:25.700 But,

00:13:26.720 you're right, Bob.

00:13:28.340 All 50 states

00:13:30.320 run independently

00:13:31.560 by their own systems.

00:13:33.940 Very complicated.

00:13:34.720 But all 50 states

00:13:35.900 got it right.

00:13:38.580 And Bob,

00:13:39.780 may I toast to you

00:13:42.600 for your perception,

00:13:45.240 your common sense

00:13:46.440 approach to this,

00:13:47.920 and your,

00:13:48.660 I'd say,

00:13:49.940 your patriotism.

00:13:51.340 Bob,

00:13:51.740 this is to you

00:13:52.340 for correctly pointing out

00:13:53.600 that everything is broken

00:13:55.300 except all 50 states

00:13:56.880 which are operating great.

00:13:58.080 Here's to you, Bob.

00:13:58.720 Bob.

00:13:58.800 And now I'd like to do

00:14:02.900 Bob's reaction.

00:14:05.660 Now I'm Bob.

00:14:09.900 So,

00:14:10.580 so you're a big

00:14:11.980 Trump supporter, huh?

00:14:13.940 No, that's,

00:14:14.580 that's really,

00:14:15.280 that's a little off point.

00:14:17.440 You know,

00:14:18.060 maybe there's some truth

00:14:19.460 to that,

00:14:19.820 but that's really

00:14:20.740 not on point.

00:14:21.540 so you favor

00:14:24.740 the drinking bleach guys

00:14:26.380 while you're saying,

00:14:26.920 no,

00:14:27.960 no,

00:14:28.320 that was a hoax.

00:14:29.560 That was a hoax.

00:14:30.520 Now what I'm saying is,

00:14:31.800 independent of who was running

00:14:33.940 is a comment about

00:14:35.480 just the election system.

00:14:38.300 So,

00:14:38.840 good luck with supporting

00:14:40.520 the Nazi.

00:14:42.120 Good luck.

00:14:42.680 I better fill my drink.

00:14:43.940 Goodbye.

00:14:44.200 Goodbye.

00:14:46.480 And scene.

00:14:47.680 That's every conversation

00:14:53.100 in America,

00:14:54.440 if you use my technique.

00:14:57.600 All right.

00:15:00.460 The Biden administration

00:15:02.500 has decided to boost

00:15:04.340 the carbon removal industry,

00:15:08.540 which is nascent.

00:15:10.920 I have never used that word

00:15:12.840 before in public.

00:15:14.520 It's nascent.

00:15:16.240 Go look it up

00:15:17.020 if you need to.

00:15:18.120 But most of you

00:15:18.740 don't need to.

00:15:20.440 These big carbon

00:15:21.680 sucking machines,

00:15:22.900 you're going to put

00:15:23.240 3.5 billion

00:15:25.020 toward boosting

00:15:25.740 the industry

00:15:26.320 to suck the CO2

00:15:28.300 out of the air

00:15:28.880 to solve climate change.

00:15:33.360 There are three bad takes.

00:15:35.780 If you had any one

00:15:36.940 of these reactions,

00:15:38.760 I might be mocking you

00:15:40.380 for being an NPC.

00:15:42.320 Here are the three bad takes

00:15:43.760 to the story.

00:15:45.060 Number one,

00:15:46.060 it's called trees.

00:15:48.080 It's called trees.

00:15:51.740 Yes,

00:15:52.640 trees do remove

00:15:53.560 carbon dioxide.

00:15:55.840 However,

00:15:56.680 I'm going to point out

00:15:57.840 that if trees

00:15:58.980 would do it

00:15:59.560 well enough,

00:16:00.740 we'd be using trees

00:16:02.740 instead of

00:16:03.720 big, giant,

00:16:04.740 sucking machines.

00:16:05.960 Because the scientists

00:16:07.160 who decided

00:16:07.920 that maybe we needed

00:16:08.920 big, giant,

00:16:10.160 sucking machines,

00:16:11.380 they've heard of trees.

00:16:13.540 They've heard of trees.

00:16:15.840 I know.

00:16:16.600 It's weird.

00:16:17.600 But scientists

00:16:18.440 have heard

00:16:19.920 of trees.

00:16:21.840 So they probably

00:16:22.780 calculated

00:16:23.340 the impact

00:16:24.760 of trees

00:16:25.220 before they made

00:16:25.920 their decision

00:16:26.420 to do it

00:16:26.860 a different way.

00:16:29.100 Bad take number two,

00:16:31.060 that's not going

00:16:31.760 to work.

00:16:33.060 That's not going

00:16:33.840 to work.

00:16:34.920 Come on.

00:16:36.360 How's that going

00:16:37.120 to work?

00:16:37.460 That's never going

00:16:37.960 to work.

00:16:39.100 It's not efficient

00:16:39.880 enough.

00:16:41.820 To which I say,

00:16:43.740 that's why

00:16:44.220 you're testing it.

00:16:45.800 It's $3.45 billion

00:16:47.100 to boost it,

00:16:48.740 but primarily

00:16:49.700 to make sure

00:16:50.400 you're doing it right.

00:16:51.840 Right?

00:16:52.720 How do you know

00:16:53.460 it doesn't work

00:16:54.020 until you try it?

00:16:55.440 It's sort of like

00:16:56.040 those Wright brothers,

00:16:57.740 those bicycle makers,

00:16:59.400 they'll never

00:17:00.040 make a lighter

00:17:00.860 than air aircraft.

00:17:03.420 Well,

00:17:04.280 why don't you

00:17:04.860 let them test it?

00:17:06.660 Maybe they might

00:17:07.380 surprise you.

00:17:08.460 I'm not saying

00:17:09.120 this stuff will work.

00:17:10.980 How the hell

00:17:11.440 would I know?

00:17:12.900 I'm saying

00:17:13.460 that if you can

00:17:14.300 test it

00:17:14.880 at a reasonable

00:17:16.600 cost relative

00:17:17.800 to the problem

00:17:19.100 you're trying

00:17:19.500 to solve,

00:17:20.600 test it.

00:17:22.060 So if you're

00:17:22.640 saying that it

00:17:23.160 won't work,

00:17:24.500 well,

00:17:25.200 you might be

00:17:26.080 an NPC

00:17:26.620 because you don't

00:17:27.980 have to ask

00:17:28.560 will it work.

00:17:30.180 Just say,

00:17:31.000 can't we test it

00:17:32.180 at a reasonable

00:17:33.420 price?

00:17:33.880 And apparently

00:17:34.260 we can.

00:17:35.420 So we'll find

00:17:36.180 out if it works

00:17:36.780 and we'll find

00:17:37.280 out if it can be,

00:17:38.460 the technology

00:17:39.160 can be improved

00:17:40.160 to the point

00:17:40.620 where it's

00:17:40.940 cost efficient.

00:17:41.520 We're not

00:17:42.940 there yet.

00:17:44.040 And then the

00:17:45.020 third bad take

00:17:46.220 is CO2

00:17:48.300 is plant food

00:17:49.420 with lots

00:17:50.580 of O's

00:17:51.040 for food.

00:17:52.580 Don't you know

00:17:53.480 that CO2

00:17:54.140 is plant food?

00:17:56.460 Yes.

00:17:59.960 Yes,

00:18:00.280 I do know that.

00:18:01.640 Guess who

00:18:02.240 else knows that?

00:18:03.720 I'm just,

00:18:04.320 I'm not sure.

00:18:06.680 Scientists.

00:18:07.120 Scientists have

00:18:09.220 heard of trees.

00:18:11.180 Scientists

00:18:11.540 have heard

00:18:13.460 of CO2

00:18:15.020 being used

00:18:15.640 in greenhouses

00:18:16.260 to boost

00:18:16.740 production.

00:18:17.540 They've heard

00:18:17.940 of it.

00:18:18.760 I know.

00:18:19.700 I know.

00:18:20.740 So I'm thinking

00:18:21.860 they've factored

00:18:23.820 that into

00:18:24.300 their decision

00:18:25.340 making.

00:18:27.720 What happens

00:18:28.680 if these machines

00:18:29.380 are too good

00:18:29.940 and they suck

00:18:30.420 all the CO2

00:18:31.020 out of the air

00:18:31.720 and then the

00:18:32.680 plants will all

00:18:33.260 die because

00:18:33.880 they need

00:18:34.140 some CO2.

00:18:36.060 Well,

00:18:36.820 I feel like

00:18:37.700 we would pull

00:18:38.340 back before

00:18:39.040 that happened.

00:18:41.120 I don't know.

00:18:42.540 Call me an optimist.

00:18:44.220 But if we saw

00:18:45.080 that our CO2

00:18:46.060 sucking machines

00:18:48.220 were destroying

00:18:49.500 the food supply

00:18:50.920 on Earth,

00:18:51.480 which would be

00:18:51.900 sort of obvious,

00:18:53.760 I feel like

00:18:54.940 we'd pull back.

00:18:56.580 If you think

00:18:57.360 we'd just keep

00:18:57.960 on going,

00:18:59.340 well,

00:19:00.000 I don't know

00:19:00.840 what to say

00:19:01.180 to that.

00:19:01.540 All right,

00:19:04.020 those are

00:19:04.320 your bad

00:19:04.920 takes.

00:19:08.500 So Elon Musk

00:19:09.580 continues to be

00:19:10.360 the most

00:19:10.700 interesting

00:19:11.340 person in the

00:19:12.320 world.

00:19:12.960 So he announced

00:19:13.580 on Twitter

00:19:13.980 that Tesla

00:19:14.460 is building

00:19:14.920 a hardcore,

00:19:15.860 he calls it,

00:19:16.840 hardcore

00:19:17.320 litigation

00:19:17.940 department

00:19:18.420 where we

00:19:18.880 directly initiate

00:19:19.780 and execute

00:19:20.340 lawsuits.

00:19:21.680 The team

00:19:22.320 will report

00:19:22.820 directly to me.

00:19:24.100 Now,

00:19:24.520 this is just

00:19:25.460 a wonderful

00:19:25.980 brushback pitch

00:19:27.020 because you know

00:19:28.280 he's going to

00:19:28.620 be attacked

00:19:29.100 with all manner

00:19:30.060 of accusations

00:19:31.060 the accusation

00:19:32.280 yesterday

00:19:32.700 that he

00:19:34.120 exposed himself

00:19:35.640 to a massage

00:19:37.580 therapist

00:19:38.080 on his private

00:19:38.880 plane.

00:19:39.940 Which,

00:19:40.500 by the way,

00:19:41.700 if you're going

00:19:42.520 to be accused

00:19:43.320 of a crime

00:19:44.040 and you got

00:19:45.060 to choose,

00:19:46.540 I would choose

00:19:47.940 that one.

00:19:49.740 I would like

00:19:50.800 to be accused

00:19:51.700 of exposing

00:19:52.800 myself to

00:19:54.460 my personal

00:19:55.460 massage therapist

00:19:56.640 on my

00:19:57.980 private jet.

00:19:58.620 if I could

00:20:00.680 get that

00:20:01.080 going,

00:20:02.120 that would

00:20:02.300 be like,

00:20:03.140 now,

00:20:03.480 I'm not

00:20:03.780 saying that

00:20:04.260 that's,

00:20:05.140 you know,

00:20:05.760 excusable.

00:20:06.960 If,

00:20:07.500 in fact,

00:20:07.980 he did

00:20:08.360 something

00:20:08.680 inappropriate,

00:20:09.460 well,

00:20:10.680 then I

00:20:11.360 don't support

00:20:12.300 that at all.

00:20:13.180 I'm just

00:20:13.640 saying that

00:20:15.220 if he had

00:20:15.820 to be accused

00:20:16.420 of something,

00:20:17.760 well,

00:20:18.060 that's the

00:20:18.320 one I'd

00:20:18.660 pick.

00:20:20.480 I'm pretty

00:20:21.060 sure I'd

00:20:21.440 pick that

00:20:21.840 one.

00:20:22.440 Like,

00:20:22.720 out of all

00:20:23.140 the things

00:20:23.540 you could

00:20:23.760 be accused

00:20:24.220 of,

00:20:24.440 yeah,

00:20:24.580 I'd take

00:20:24.820 that one.

00:20:25.380 Thank you.

00:20:29.320 But,

00:20:30.020 to me,

00:20:30.940 this looks

00:20:31.280 like Elon

00:20:31.980 Musk

00:20:32.380 negotiating

00:20:33.260 in public.

00:20:34.360 In this

00:20:34.780 case,

00:20:35.480 I use

00:20:36.100 negotiating

00:20:36.700 loosely to

00:20:38.020 mean he's

00:20:38.680 warning people

00:20:39.480 that if they

00:20:40.000 come after

00:20:40.540 him,

00:20:41.140 it's going

00:20:41.540 to be

00:20:41.740 really

00:20:42.000 expensive.

00:20:43.420 And,

00:20:43.640 by the

00:20:43.860 way,

00:20:44.880 he's the

00:20:45.260 richest

00:20:45.440 person in

00:20:45.960 the world.

00:20:47.040 So,

00:20:47.440 if you'd

00:20:47.680 like to

00:20:48.040 come after

00:20:48.500 somebody

00:20:49.000 with a

00:20:50.280 strategy,

00:20:50.860 a legal

00:20:51.240 strategy,

00:20:52.640 he's

00:20:53.020 basically

00:20:53.460 telling you

00:20:54.140 that at

00:20:55.000 this point

00:20:55.440 he's

00:20:55.740 going to

00:20:56.000 destroy

00:20:56.300 you.

00:20:58.420 He didn't

00:20:59.020 say it

00:20:59.300 directly,

00:21:00.340 but if

00:21:00.820 you've

00:21:01.020 got this

00:21:02.340 hardcore

00:21:02.840 litigation

00:21:03.340 team

00:21:03.920 that's

00:21:04.160 going to

00:21:04.340 be

00:21:04.480 aggressively

00:21:04.960 going

00:21:05.300 after

00:21:05.560 things

00:21:05.980 and

00:21:06.460 reporting

00:21:06.840 directly

00:21:07.300 to

00:21:07.540 Musk,

00:21:08.420 yeah,

00:21:08.920 he's

00:21:09.140 going to

00:21:09.320 make it

00:21:09.600 expensive

00:21:10.060 to mess

00:21:10.980 with him.

00:21:12.640 So,

00:21:13.140 I like

00:21:13.620 the fact

00:21:13.960 that he

00:21:14.160 put it

00:21:14.380 out there

00:21:14.660 as a

00:21:15.080 sort of

00:21:16.840 a self-defense

00:21:17.720 thing.

00:21:19.120 Speaking

00:21:19.580 of climate

00:21:20.220 change,

00:21:20.620 Bjorn

00:21:20.940 Lomborg,

00:21:21.740 who you

00:21:22.060 know as

00:21:22.640 one of

00:21:23.860 the most

00:21:24.240 rational

00:21:25.040 evaluators

00:21:27.000 of climate

00:21:27.500 change and

00:21:28.040 other issues.

00:21:29.740 And he

00:21:30.420 was looking

00:21:30.720 at the

00:21:31.380 adequacy

00:21:32.020 of batteries

00:21:32.820 if we

00:21:34.100 had a

00:21:34.340 world that

00:21:34.740 was powered

00:21:35.160 by solar

00:21:35.720 and wind.

00:21:38.780 Now,

00:21:39.360 we know

00:21:39.540 that you

00:21:39.760 need battery

00:21:40.180 backup for

00:21:40.720 those because

00:21:41.200 they're not

00:21:41.720 continuous

00:21:42.400 sources.

00:21:43.740 Wind and

00:21:44.400 solar is

00:21:44.760 not.

00:21:45.440 So,

00:21:45.860 he gives

00:21:46.260 this estimate.

00:21:46.980 And I

00:21:47.160 would love

00:21:47.420 to know

00:21:47.780 if Elon

00:21:48.520 Musk agrees

00:21:49.520 with this

00:21:49.960 estimate.

00:21:50.360 he says

00:21:52.440 Europe uses

00:21:53.540 and he

00:21:54.000 gives

00:21:54.160 some

00:21:54.340 statistics

00:21:54.880 of how

00:21:55.300 much energy

00:21:55.720 they use.

00:21:57.640 So,

00:21:58.160 they have

00:21:58.360 enough

00:21:58.620 battery

00:21:59.000 storage

00:21:59.400 now

00:21:59.740 for

00:22:00.260 one

00:22:01.680 minute

00:22:01.980 and

00:22:02.180 21

00:22:02.600 seconds.

00:22:04.680 So,

00:22:05.320 all of

00:22:05.720 Europe's

00:22:06.180 battery

00:22:06.560 backup,

00:22:08.100 if they

00:22:08.980 use it

00:22:09.300 all,

00:22:09.520 would give

00:22:09.740 them another

00:22:10.180 little under

00:22:11.340 two minutes

00:22:11.900 of power.

00:22:13.800 All of

00:22:14.200 it.

00:22:14.360 by the

00:22:18.500 year

00:22:18.660 2030,

00:22:20.280 that

00:22:20.500 number

00:22:20.760 should

00:22:20.980 go way

00:22:21.380 up,

00:22:21.880 the

00:22:22.040 estimate

00:22:22.260 is,

00:22:22.860 up to

00:22:23.360 almost

00:22:24.000 12

00:22:24.360 minutes.

00:22:26.420 In

00:22:26.940 2030,

00:22:28.260 we might

00:22:28.660 be able

00:22:28.920 to get

00:22:29.160 the amount

00:22:29.500 of battery

00:22:29.860 backup to

00:22:30.440 almost 12

00:22:31.140 minutes of

00:22:31.740 the whole

00:22:31.980 day.

00:22:34.100 Now,

00:22:34.880 isn't this

00:22:35.500 the part

00:22:35.900 where Elon

00:22:36.800 Musk needs

00:22:37.320 to explain

00:22:37.840 to us

00:22:38.180 how we

00:22:38.480 can get

00:22:38.780 enough

00:22:39.020 battery

00:22:39.960 backup?

00:22:40.840 Because

00:22:41.140 he makes

00:22:41.720 a good

00:22:42.000 argument,

00:22:42.580 Musk

00:22:42.800 does,

00:22:43.120 that you

00:22:44.680 need just

00:22:45.100 a tiny

00:22:45.640 corner of

00:22:46.360 the United

00:22:46.900 States with

00:22:47.700 solar panels,

00:22:49.180 so tiny

00:22:50.440 that I

00:22:51.420 don't even

00:22:51.700 know if

00:22:51.980 you'd notice

00:22:52.460 it from

00:22:53.000 the space

00:22:55.500 station.

00:22:56.520 If you

00:22:56.880 were looking

00:22:57.220 down on

00:22:57.740 it,

00:22:57.960 I don't

00:22:58.220 know if

00:22:58.460 it would

00:22:58.640 be big

00:22:59.020 enough even

00:23:00.300 to see

00:23:00.680 it from

00:23:00.960 space,

00:23:01.820 but it

00:23:02.500 would power

00:23:02.900 the whole

00:23:03.220 United

00:23:03.500 States.

00:23:05.500 And

00:23:05.560 Musk gives

00:23:06.880 his description

00:23:07.740 of how big

00:23:08.280 that space

00:23:08.780 would be.

00:23:09.480 Now,

00:23:09.660 of course,

00:23:10.640 that's

00:23:10.960 conceptual,

00:23:12.260 because you

00:23:12.620 can't put

00:23:13.000 all your

00:23:13.280 power source

00:23:13.860 in one

00:23:14.220 place.

00:23:14.740 The grid

00:23:15.080 couldn't

00:23:15.380 handle it.

00:23:16.320 But suppose

00:23:16.960 you distributed

00:23:18.080 that around.

00:23:20.360 But I've

00:23:21.220 never seen

00:23:21.700 him address

00:23:22.540 how much

00:23:23.580 battery

00:23:24.080 backup

00:23:24.500 you need.

00:23:25.660 Has

00:23:25.800 anybody

00:23:25.980 seen

00:23:26.240 that?

00:23:27.040 Send me

00:23:27.480 a link

00:23:27.740 to it

00:23:28.000 if you

00:23:28.180 have any

00:23:28.540 recent

00:23:30.840 statements

00:23:32.260 where he

00:23:32.840 mentioned

00:23:33.500 whether you

00:23:33.940 could get

00:23:34.240 enough

00:23:34.500 battery

00:23:34.860 backup.

00:23:38.620 Wait a

00:23:39.400 minute.

00:23:39.780 Do you need

00:23:40.220 battery backup

00:23:40.920 backup if

00:23:41.240 your grid

00:23:41.940 was sufficient?

00:23:44.780 Let me

00:23:45.260 ask you

00:23:45.560 this.

00:23:46.580 If you

00:23:47.140 had your

00:23:47.640 solar powers

00:23:48.940 spread around

00:23:49.780 the country

00:23:50.280 and then

00:23:51.740 you connected

00:23:52.520 your grid

00:23:53.200 so that any

00:23:54.000 grid that

00:23:54.460 needs power

00:23:55.200 can get it

00:23:55.720 from anywhere

00:23:56.160 else in the

00:23:56.660 country,

00:23:57.020 that may be

00:23:57.540 impossible.

00:23:58.220 I don't know.

00:23:58.560 So that's

00:23:59.160 the part I

00:24:00.900 need you to

00:24:01.300 tell me if

00:24:01.700 it's possible.

00:24:03.080 Because the

00:24:03.660 longer you

00:24:04.120 send the

00:24:04.500 electricity,

00:24:05.160 the more it

00:24:05.700 gets degraded.

00:24:06.700 There's less

00:24:07.300 of it by the

00:24:07.760 time it gets

00:24:08.120 there.

00:24:08.260 So there's

00:24:09.440 some practical

00:24:10.020 limits about

00:24:10.680 sending electricity

00:24:12.040 long distances.

00:24:13.920 Right?

00:24:15.220 But could you

00:24:16.300 put enough

00:24:17.140 panels in

00:24:20.340 enough parts

00:24:20.920 of the

00:24:21.160 country that

00:24:22.700 no matter

00:24:23.140 which ones

00:24:23.680 were dark,

00:24:24.980 there would

00:24:25.320 still be

00:24:25.700 enough light

00:24:26.760 in the other

00:24:27.180 part of the

00:24:27.540 country or

00:24:28.560 wind?

00:24:30.700 Because most,

00:24:31.880 I guess you'd

00:24:32.420 have to go

00:24:32.800 global because

00:24:33.500 the country's

00:24:34.020 dark at the

00:24:34.520 same time.

00:24:35.520 So that

00:24:35.760 doesn't work.

00:24:36.280 But you

00:24:38.020 could take

00:24:38.360 care of

00:24:38.620 cloudy days.

00:24:40.260 At least

00:24:40.700 cloudy days you

00:24:41.500 could take

00:24:41.820 care of.

00:24:42.820 So I don't

00:24:43.480 know if the

00:24:43.880 grid can

00:24:44.320 solve any of

00:24:44.800 this or it

00:24:45.160 just needs to

00:24:45.620 be batteries.

00:24:46.300 I have a

00:24:46.660 suspicion it

00:24:47.220 has to be

00:24:47.500 batteries.

00:24:48.780 All right.

00:24:50.440 Bill Barr

00:24:51.120 was talking

00:24:51.660 about the

00:24:52.320 trans trend.

00:24:55.500 And I

00:24:56.000 didn't know

00:24:56.320 this, but

00:24:56.640 apparently the

00:24:57.500 percentage of

00:24:59.220 trans people

00:25:00.680 in the general

00:25:01.460 population seems

00:25:02.420 to be doubling

00:25:03.000 every generation,

00:25:03.840 as Bill

00:25:05.920 Maher pointed

00:25:06.380 out.

00:25:07.440 Now, it

00:25:08.200 probably doesn't

00:25:09.020 actually double,

00:25:10.120 does it?

00:25:11.120 Maybe we're just

00:25:11.880 learning of it.

00:25:12.740 Maybe there were

00:25:13.200 more people than

00:25:13.860 we ever imagined.

00:25:15.240 And doubling it

00:25:15.980 up to, you

00:25:16.400 know, 2% could

00:25:18.260 be just a

00:25:18.820 statistical

00:25:19.400 aberration.

00:25:20.960 But apparently

00:25:21.740 it's up to like

00:25:22.400 20% or something

00:25:23.480 in some places.

00:25:24.980 20% trans

00:25:26.180 children, like

00:25:27.320 in L.A.

00:25:27.800 you're saying

00:25:30.320 that if you go

00:25:30.960 to a dinner

00:25:31.420 party in L.A.,

00:25:32.920 you know, several

00:25:33.580 people will be

00:25:34.260 talking about

00:25:34.700 their trans

00:25:35.220 children.

00:25:36.700 Several?

00:25:37.860 You know, just

00:25:38.340 statistically it

00:25:39.100 can't possibly be

00:25:39.960 true.

00:25:41.760 And the

00:25:42.820 implication here

00:25:43.640 is that it's

00:25:44.120 more socially

00:25:44.940 driven than

00:25:45.620 biological.

00:25:48.060 What do you

00:25:48.720 think?

00:25:49.380 Do you think

00:25:49.940 that people

00:25:50.400 could be

00:25:50.940 socially driven

00:25:52.080 to question

00:25:53.640 their actual

00:25:54.280 gender identity

00:25:56.480 and then change

00:25:57.300 it?

00:25:57.800 Do you

00:25:59.560 think that

00:25:59.920 social pressure

00:26:01.480 is enough

00:26:02.180 to make

00:26:02.640 people change

00:26:03.300 their gender

00:26:04.620 identity?

00:26:07.580 Yes.

00:26:08.380 Yes, it is.

00:26:09.300 It's plenty.

00:26:10.960 Yeah.

00:26:11.380 The answer is

00:26:12.060 unambiguously,

00:26:13.120 totally yes.

00:26:14.720 It just

00:26:15.100 wouldn't affect

00:26:15.580 everybody.

00:26:16.980 Right?

00:26:17.580 Persuasion

00:26:18.120 is like that.

00:26:20.680 Persuasion

00:26:21.160 doesn't work

00:26:22.500 on everybody.

00:26:23.760 It doesn't

00:26:24.100 work all the

00:26:24.620 time.

00:26:25.800 It's a

00:26:26.440 statistical thing.

00:26:27.260 So yes,

00:26:28.200 if you have

00:26:28.720 a society

00:26:29.320 that's

00:26:29.840 promoting

00:26:30.980 anything

00:26:31.460 or at

00:26:32.820 least

00:26:33.100 removing

00:26:34.180 the

00:26:34.620 disincentive

00:26:35.440 to anything,

00:26:36.420 you get

00:26:36.760 more of it.

00:26:38.020 You get

00:26:38.320 more of it,

00:26:38.700 right?

00:26:39.180 So I think

00:26:39.960 society is

00:26:40.680 largely driving

00:26:41.900 it.

00:26:42.440 Now,

00:26:43.960 suppose it's

00:26:44.860 true.

00:26:46.380 I don't know

00:26:46.960 it's true,

00:26:47.820 but suppose it's

00:26:48.580 true that

00:26:49.800 society is

00:26:50.600 driving a

00:26:51.420 number of

00:26:51.740 people who

00:26:52.140 would not

00:26:52.560 have made

00:26:52.960 the decisions

00:26:53.820 they made

00:26:54.320 otherwise,

00:26:54.760 in a

00:26:55.800 different time

00:26:56.460 and with

00:26:56.800 a different

00:26:57.120 social situation.

00:26:58.540 It just

00:26:58.880 wouldn't have

00:26:59.260 happened.

00:27:00.800 Now,

00:27:01.340 is that

00:27:01.580 good or

00:27:01.880 bad?

00:27:03.420 Because here's

00:27:04.160 the thing.

00:27:05.460 If you're

00:27:06.360 promoting and

00:27:08.080 you're really,

00:27:09.220 let's say,

00:27:09.660 welcoming of

00:27:10.580 any trans

00:27:11.660 situation,

00:27:13.400 do you not

00:27:14.320 guarantee you'll

00:27:15.140 get too much

00:27:15.740 of it?

00:27:16.620 Too much of

00:27:17.240 it meaning

00:27:17.560 people who

00:27:18.100 really maybe

00:27:18.800 shouldn't have

00:27:19.240 made the

00:27:19.580 decision,

00:27:21.220 make the

00:27:22.080 decision.

00:27:24.160 But it

00:27:24.680 could go

00:27:24.940 the other

00:27:25.220 way,

00:27:25.440 right?

00:27:26.680 The other

00:27:27.220 way,

00:27:27.500 if it was

00:27:27.800 totally

00:27:28.180 suppressed and

00:27:29.980 discouraged,

00:27:31.520 there are

00:27:31.920 probably a

00:27:32.440 number of

00:27:32.800 people who

00:27:33.380 would have

00:27:33.760 been better

00:27:34.180 off with

00:27:34.580 the transition

00:27:35.140 and then

00:27:36.240 wouldn't do

00:27:36.700 it.

00:27:37.780 So who

00:27:38.320 do you

00:27:38.480 make the

00:27:38.840 losers?

00:27:40.700 Because you

00:27:41.620 have to

00:27:41.860 pick a

00:27:42.200 winner and

00:27:42.660 you have

00:27:42.860 to pick

00:27:43.100 a loser.

00:27:44.480 Do you

00:27:44.780 just go by

00:27:45.240 numbers and

00:27:46.460 say,

00:27:46.700 okay,

00:27:46.920 which one

00:27:47.360 has the

00:27:47.680 greatest

00:27:47.940 number of

00:27:48.660 unhappy

00:27:49.040 people?

00:27:50.600 I don't

00:27:50.860 know.

00:27:51.040 Or do

00:27:51.960 you say

00:27:52.380 do no

00:27:53.400 harm and

00:27:54.720 it's worse

00:27:55.140 to injure

00:27:57.140 somebody than

00:27:58.560 it is to

00:27:59.060 not help

00:27:59.680 somebody?

00:28:01.600 I don't

00:28:01.920 know.

00:28:02.080 Is that a

00:28:02.400 reasonable

00:28:02.720 standard?

00:28:03.860 Based on

00:28:04.480 what?

00:28:04.800 Why would

00:28:05.120 you say

00:28:05.380 that's

00:28:05.600 reasonable?

00:28:07.080 And so

00:28:09.200 I always

00:28:09.680 separate the

00:28:10.280 two questions.

00:28:12.700 Question

00:28:13.180 number one,

00:28:13.820 is it a

00:28:14.260 good idea

00:28:14.980 the way

00:28:16.300 we're

00:28:16.540 messaging

00:28:17.020 and handling

00:28:18.040 the trans

00:28:18.560 situation?

00:28:19.060 Is it a

00:28:20.880 good idea

00:28:21.380 to do

00:28:21.740 it that

00:28:22.020 way?

00:28:22.920 And then

00:28:23.200 secondly,

00:28:24.400 is trans

00:28:25.540 a real

00:28:25.960 thing with

00:28:26.480 real people

00:28:27.020 making real

00:28:27.660 decisions?

00:28:28.640 Or is it

00:28:29.020 all psychological

00:28:29.820 or whatever?

00:28:30.700 So I say

00:28:32.060 let people

00:28:32.620 make their

00:28:33.520 own decisions.

00:28:35.620 Knowing that

00:28:36.840 many of them

00:28:37.340 will destroy

00:28:38.000 their lives.

00:28:40.160 Like everything

00:28:41.040 else.

00:28:42.440 I let people

00:28:43.520 make their own

00:28:44.060 decisions on a

00:28:44.840 motorcycle.

00:28:45.340 how many

00:28:47.560 people will

00:28:48.280 dump their

00:28:49.440 motorcycle at

00:28:50.260 one point or

00:28:51.200 another while

00:28:51.880 they own it?

00:28:53.220 If you buy a

00:28:53.880 motorcycle,

00:28:54.560 are you going

00:28:55.560 to go down?

00:28:56.940 Does anybody

00:28:57.560 own a

00:28:57.860 motorcycle?

00:28:58.840 People who

00:28:59.380 own a

00:28:59.640 motorcycle,

00:29:00.160 answer this

00:29:00.520 question.

00:29:00.900 If you own

00:29:01.280 a motorcycle,

00:29:02.360 are you going

00:29:02.720 to lay it

00:29:03.060 down?

00:29:04.160 Are you going

00:29:04.820 to lay down

00:29:05.280 your motorcycle

00:29:05.800 if you own

00:29:06.260 one?

00:29:07.520 Yes.

00:29:09.400 Yes.

00:29:10.440 You buy a

00:29:11.220 motorcycle knowing

00:29:12.080 you're going to

00:29:12.600 lay it down,

00:29:13.540 meaning at

00:29:14.980 some point

00:29:15.380 you're going

00:29:15.620 to have a

00:29:15.860 situation with

00:29:16.580 it.

00:29:18.920 Nobody buys

00:29:19.720 a motorcycle

00:29:20.200 and says I'm

00:29:20.980 not going to

00:29:21.340 wreck this

00:29:21.720 thing.

00:29:22.720 If you do,

00:29:23.700 you're not

00:29:24.340 really being

00:29:24.820 rational about

00:29:25.500 it.

00:29:26.500 Buying a

00:29:27.100 motorcycle means

00:29:28.400 buying a

00:29:29.400 wreck.

00:29:30.420 You're going

00:29:30.940 to be in

00:29:31.260 one.

00:29:32.080 You're going

00:29:32.440 to lay it

00:29:32.800 down.

00:29:33.860 At some

00:29:34.360 point or

00:29:34.720 another,

00:29:35.540 you're going

00:29:35.960 to be laying

00:29:36.460 by the side

00:29:36.980 of the road

00:29:37.440 and your

00:29:37.780 motorcycle is

00:29:38.400 going to

00:29:38.520 be sideways.

00:29:40.080 Right?

00:29:41.260 Anybody who

00:29:41.880 owns a

00:29:42.120 motorcycle can

00:29:42.780 confirm this.

00:29:43.980 You buy a

00:29:44.580 motorcycle with

00:29:45.420 the knowledge

00:29:46.200 you bought

00:29:46.580 yourself an

00:29:47.040 accident, you

00:29:48.440 just hope you

00:29:48.980 don't die.

00:29:49.880 That's it.

00:29:51.040 Same with a

00:29:51.560 bicycle.

00:29:53.020 Who buys a

00:29:53.900 bicycle saying I

00:29:54.720 won't fall off

00:29:55.320 my bicycle?

00:29:56.220 Nobody.

00:29:57.320 Nobody.

00:29:58.280 You're falling

00:29:59.000 off your

00:29:59.360 bicycle.

00:30:00.540 That's going

00:30:00.940 to happen.

00:30:03.280 So I don't

00:30:05.420 like analogies

00:30:06.300 because they're

00:30:06.780 always too

00:30:07.380 imperfect.

00:30:08.380 But getting

00:30:08.960 you to the

00:30:09.640 way of thinking

00:30:10.340 only, just

00:30:12.120 let that

00:30:12.860 analogy go.

00:30:13.600 We don't

00:30:13.820 need to

00:30:14.120 defend it.

00:30:15.060 I'm just

00:30:15.480 saying that

00:30:16.000 lots of

00:30:16.660 people will

00:30:17.040 make personal

00:30:17.680 choices about

00:30:18.620 transitioning that

00:30:21.140 you and I

00:30:21.620 would not

00:30:22.000 make.

00:30:23.120 And sometimes

00:30:23.660 we would have

00:30:24.200 made the right

00:30:24.660 decision and

00:30:25.800 sometimes we

00:30:26.440 wouldn't because

00:30:27.560 we don't really

00:30:28.060 know.

00:30:28.940 Because unfortunately

00:30:29.680 it's one of those

00:30:30.260 things you don't

00:30:30.720 really know if

00:30:31.440 you're going to

00:30:31.680 be happier.

00:30:32.980 You just

00:30:33.500 got to guess.

00:30:34.800 So this is a

00:30:35.800 case where if I

00:30:36.740 were the emperor

00:30:38.000 and I were

00:30:39.480 in charge of

00:30:40.080 everybody's life

00:30:40.900 I'd probably

00:30:42.080 slow down this

00:30:42.920 transitioning stuff.

00:30:44.800 I'm sure I

00:30:45.540 would make it

00:30:45.980 illegal before

00:30:47.720 a certain age.

00:30:50.340 Am I going to

00:30:51.300 be cancelled by

00:30:52.000 social media?

00:30:52.920 Because we

00:30:53.460 treat everything

00:30:53.980 else like that,

00:30:54.700 right?

00:30:55.560 Anything that's a

00:30:56.440 big permanent

00:30:57.100 decision kind of

00:30:57.980 thing.

00:30:58.440 We say you have

00:30:59.260 to be a certain

00:30:59.740 age to do it.

00:31:01.180 Now medical

00:31:01.700 stuff,

00:31:02.960 medical stuff,

00:31:04.780 parents do get

00:31:05.680 to decide.

00:31:08.000 So it's not

00:31:08.700 really the kid

00:31:09.240 deciding in the

00:31:09.900 first place,

00:31:10.820 ultimately,

00:31:11.560 because they

00:31:11.860 can't make that

00:31:12.360 decision.

00:31:14.120 So I'm not sure

00:31:14.960 that a parent

00:31:15.540 should make a

00:31:16.060 decision for a

00:31:16.740 kid about

00:31:17.500 transitioning.

00:31:19.680 I can say

00:31:20.420 that it's always

00:31:21.440 a decision

00:31:22.000 whether you

00:31:22.380 decide to do

00:31:22.980 it or not

00:31:23.360 do it.

00:31:23.720 It's still a

00:31:24.080 decision.

00:31:24.920 But I think

00:31:25.520 the decision

00:31:26.040 to wait and

00:31:27.700 let the kid

00:31:28.440 make their own

00:31:29.100 decision,

00:31:29.780 let's say when

00:31:30.620 they turn 18,

00:31:32.340 that just makes

00:31:33.460 more sense to

00:31:35.780 me.

00:31:36.520 Now is that

00:31:37.260 anti-trans

00:31:39.960 to say that

00:31:40.600 the trans

00:31:41.060 people should

00:31:41.700 make adult

00:31:42.400 decisions instead

00:31:43.260 of child

00:31:43.700 decisions?

00:31:45.220 I don't know.

00:31:46.900 Is that

00:31:47.220 taking it too

00:31:48.780 far?

00:31:49.940 I don't know.

00:31:50.960 I try to be

00:31:51.700 the most

00:31:54.080 aggressive

00:31:54.580 defender of

00:31:55.840 anybody who's

00:31:56.540 in a situation

00:31:59.360 where they're a

00:32:00.240 minority,

00:32:00.720 basically.

00:32:01.760 I like to

00:32:02.480 aggressively defend

00:32:03.400 them all.

00:32:04.460 It's just a

00:32:04.900 better world

00:32:05.320 that way.

00:32:05.680 So I hope

00:32:09.760 the best for

00:32:11.320 the trans

00:32:11.720 community in

00:32:13.100 all cases.

00:32:16.160 If I had to

00:32:17.000 guess, I would

00:32:17.520 say that the

00:32:18.100 transitioning among

00:32:19.000 kids is 80%

00:32:19.980 social.

00:32:22.120 Am I wrong?

00:32:23.560 I don't know.

00:32:24.600 It might be.

00:32:25.700 It might be 80%

00:32:26.940 biological.

00:32:28.460 But it feels,

00:32:30.180 without the

00:32:30.840 benefit of any

00:32:31.540 science, based on

00:32:33.780 everything I know

00:32:34.500 about everything

00:32:35.200 and the trends

00:32:36.320 and I'd say

00:32:37.580 80% is a

00:32:39.880 social pressure

00:32:40.580 and maybe

00:32:42.420 20% is

00:32:43.320 biological.

00:32:44.600 But again,

00:32:45.620 that's not good

00:32:46.460 enough to ban

00:32:47.040 it or to say

00:32:48.620 that you can't

00:32:49.100 do it.

00:32:50.420 So, you

00:32:52.420 know, I do

00:32:53.060 generally want

00:32:54.000 parents to have

00:32:54.860 the final say on

00:32:55.720 medical stuff,

00:32:56.780 but I don't

00:32:58.140 even think they

00:32:58.860 should have a

00:32:59.280 say in this

00:32:59.740 case.

00:33:00.060 because they're

00:33:02.800 really making

00:33:03.240 a decision for

00:33:04.000 an adult who

00:33:04.860 hasn't arrived

00:33:05.640 yet, right?

00:33:06.760 The kid.

00:33:10.980 So, did you

00:33:11.900 see that I

00:33:12.940 talked about

00:33:13.400 this, that

00:33:13.900 Elon Musk

00:33:14.580 called out the

00:33:15.660 Clinton campaign

00:33:17.360 lead?

00:33:17.740 He tweeted

00:33:18.080 this.

00:33:19.040 He said,

00:33:19.500 I bet most

00:33:20.220 people still

00:33:20.840 don't know that

00:33:21.780 a Clinton

00:33:22.300 campaign lawyer

00:33:23.180 using campaign

00:33:24.200 funds created

00:33:25.580 an elaborate

00:33:26.220 hoax about

00:33:26.980 Trump and

00:33:27.480 Russia.

00:33:28.420 Makes you

00:33:29.120 wonder what

00:33:29.520 else is fake,

00:33:30.400 he says.

00:33:31.660 Now he's

00:33:32.180 called out

00:33:32.660 the bleach

00:33:34.160 drinking hoax

00:33:34.900 as fake.

00:33:35.820 He's called

00:33:36.380 out the

00:33:36.700 Russia collusion

00:33:37.320 thing as

00:33:37.740 fake, including

00:33:38.540 the knowledge

00:33:39.920 certain that a

00:33:40.840 Clinton campaign

00:33:41.460 lawyer was

00:33:42.100 behind it, or

00:33:43.220 the major

00:33:43.760 part of it.

00:33:45.680 Makes you

00:33:46.300 wonder what

00:33:46.640 else is fake.

00:33:48.960 He hasn't

00:33:49.740 gotten to

00:33:50.160 Charlottesville

00:33:50.680 yet, but I

00:33:52.340 feel he's

00:33:52.780 circling it.

00:33:54.540 That might be

00:33:55.280 too much of a

00:33:56.800 third rail even

00:33:57.520 for Musk.

00:33:59.120 That would

00:33:59.860 certainly be

00:34:00.320 pushing the

00:34:00.960 risk-taking

00:34:02.400 there.

00:34:03.300 But it's the

00:34:03.960 biggest remaining

00:34:05.020 hoax.

00:34:05.600 It's the

00:34:06.000 tentpole hoax,

00:34:06.920 yes.

00:34:07.380 It is the

00:34:07.920 tentpole hoax,

00:34:08.880 the one that

00:34:09.380 supports all

00:34:10.420 the rest.

00:34:12.440 We'll see.

00:34:16.720 And you all

00:34:17.600 saw the

00:34:18.420 Elon Musk

00:34:19.600 tweet about

00:34:20.440 his wiener.

00:34:22.340 I didn't

00:34:23.000 realize that he

00:34:23.480 was talking to

00:34:24.140 one of the

00:34:26.220 co-creators or

00:34:27.260 creators of

00:34:28.120 YouTube,

00:34:29.420 somebody named

00:34:29.900 Chad Hurley.

00:34:31.820 And

00:34:31.840 Tesla,

00:34:34.640 you know,

00:34:35.280 and Chad was

00:34:36.340 asking him to

00:34:37.200 hurry up and

00:34:37.800 close his

00:34:38.380 Twitter deal.

00:34:39.620 And Tesla

00:34:40.860 responded,

00:34:41.980 fine, if you

00:34:42.660 touch my

00:34:43.060 wiener, you

00:34:43.780 can have a

00:34:44.200 horse.

00:34:46.480 If you touch

00:34:47.400 my wiener, you

00:34:48.140 can have a

00:34:48.640 horse.

00:34:49.660 You can't

00:34:50.120 tweet better

00:34:50.560 than that.

00:34:51.040 All right, I

00:34:52.800 told you I

00:34:53.400 watched Dinesh

00:34:54.280 D'Souza's movie

00:34:55.220 2000 Mules,

00:34:56.420 to give you

00:34:57.080 an opinion,

00:34:58.040 and that

00:34:58.680 there were

00:34:59.120 some pushback

00:34:59.900 on it,

00:35:00.640 and the

00:35:01.260 pushback, I

00:35:01.940 thought, was

00:35:02.400 reasonable.

00:35:03.820 Reasonable

00:35:04.340 pushback, but

00:35:05.620 you have to

00:35:06.140 also wait for

00:35:06.800 his reasonable

00:35:07.700 pushback to

00:35:08.600 the pushback.

00:35:09.720 The first

00:35:10.580 criticism of

00:35:11.780 the movie was

00:35:12.420 that using

00:35:13.000 geo-tracking

00:35:13.780 to push

00:35:15.340 somebody in

00:35:15.840 the vicinity

00:35:16.720 of a drop

00:35:17.780 box for

00:35:18.320 ballots doesn't

00:35:19.780 mean they put

00:35:20.460 ballots in the

00:35:21.120 box.

00:35:22.200 Maybe it

00:35:22.700 means that's

00:35:23.260 where their

00:35:23.620 Starbucks is,

00:35:24.440 and they

00:35:25.420 go to that

00:35:26.220 location

00:35:26.680 repeatedly, and

00:35:27.740 it's just

00:35:28.180 next to a

00:35:28.740 box.

00:35:30.060 Right?

00:35:30.720 Reasonable.

00:35:32.440 But then

00:35:32.860 Dinesh says,

00:35:34.200 that's why we

00:35:35.420 eliminated everybody

00:35:37.260 who didn't go to

00:35:38.040 ten different

00:35:38.740 drop boxes.

00:35:40.980 Okay, if

00:35:41.600 one person was

00:35:42.960 in the vicinity

00:35:43.540 of ten

00:35:44.120 different drop

00:35:44.740 boxes,

00:35:46.020 that's a

00:35:48.060 pretty good

00:35:48.420 argument,

00:35:49.220 because there

00:35:50.020 aren't ten

00:35:50.500 Starbucks next

00:35:51.780 to ten drop

00:35:52.460 boxes, it's

00:35:53.500 statistically

00:35:54.040 impossible.

00:35:56.660 So I think

00:35:57.220 that Dinesh

00:35:57.960 makes a

00:35:58.600 completely

00:35:59.400 solid argument

00:36:00.200 that the

00:36:01.380 geo-tracking

00:36:02.060 for this

00:36:02.620 purpose is

00:36:03.300 good enough,

00:36:04.440 it's accurate

00:36:05.020 enough, because

00:36:06.300 they eliminated

00:36:07.580 all the data

00:36:08.240 from somebody

00:36:08.780 who didn't go

00:36:09.300 to ten

00:36:09.960 drop boxes.

00:36:11.860 If this

00:36:12.700 data were

00:36:13.360 people who

00:36:13.860 went to at

00:36:15.360 least one or

00:36:16.160 two drop

00:36:16.720 boxes, then

00:36:18.140 you could say

00:36:18.600 to yourself,

00:36:19.220 but that's just

00:36:19.720 the normal

00:36:20.220 flow of people.

00:36:21.680 There's always

00:36:22.100 going to be one

00:36:22.740 person walking

00:36:23.380 by a drop

00:36:24.000 box, but

00:36:25.280 he didn't do

00:36:25.680 that.

00:36:26.700 It was like,

00:36:27.300 when does one

00:36:27.980 person go to

00:36:29.300 ten different

00:36:29.960 drop boxes?

00:36:31.180 Because it's

00:36:32.060 not like they're

00:36:32.600 evenly distributed,

00:36:34.440 so the

00:36:34.840 statistical

00:36:36.020 likelihood of

00:36:37.000 one person

00:36:37.640 being within

00:36:38.800 a few feet

00:36:39.400 of ten

00:36:39.920 different drop

00:36:40.520 boxes on,

00:36:41.440 let's say,

00:36:41.680 a short

00:36:41.980 period of

00:36:42.440 time, pretty

00:36:43.880 close to

00:36:44.360 zero that

00:36:45.080 that's an

00:36:45.480 accident.

00:36:46.640 So I would

00:36:47.020 say that

00:36:47.380 Dinesh's

00:36:47.860 response to

00:36:48.480 that is the

00:36:49.980 winning argument.

00:36:51.440 it's stronger

00:36:52.860 than the

00:36:53.320 criticism.

00:36:55.160 Number two,

00:36:57.440 criticize for

00:36:58.420 not showing

00:36:59.060 videos of

00:37:00.860 the one

00:37:01.280 person doing

00:37:01.920 those multiple

00:37:02.520 drop boxes.

00:37:03.800 There are

00:37:04.080 videos of

00:37:04.640 one person

00:37:05.140 doing it

00:37:05.520 once, but

00:37:07.860 he hasn't

00:37:08.460 produced the

00:37:09.020 one person

00:37:09.540 doing it

00:37:09.960 multiple times,

00:37:10.920 which would

00:37:11.200 really be the

00:37:11.840 hammer on

00:37:13.540 the case.

00:37:14.920 He says

00:37:15.760 that they're

00:37:16.560 working on it,

00:37:17.160 and the

00:37:18.100 reason that

00:37:18.560 they didn't

00:37:19.140 is because

00:37:19.740 in many

00:37:21.720 cases the

00:37:22.280 video doesn't

00:37:22.820 exist, because

00:37:23.840 there's no

00:37:24.220 video surveillance

00:37:25.020 in that box,

00:37:26.160 and in many

00:37:26.940 cases it's so

00:37:27.760 poor that you

00:37:29.360 can't make

00:37:29.800 out if it's

00:37:30.280 the same

00:37:30.580 person.

00:37:31.880 But if

00:37:33.080 the video

00:37:33.640 has a

00:37:34.140 time signature,

00:37:35.860 as does

00:37:36.620 the geo

00:37:38.100 tracking,

00:37:39.560 presumably,

00:37:40.640 and I think

00:37:41.100 this is what

00:37:41.580 he said he

00:37:41.960 was doing,

00:37:42.380 but I'm not

00:37:42.760 100% sure,

00:37:43.860 I think he's

00:37:44.520 looking to

00:37:44.980 sync up the

00:37:46.440 exact time

00:37:47.260 of the

00:37:47.960 video with

00:37:48.560 the exact

00:37:48.900 time of

00:37:49.240 the geo

00:37:49.620 tracking to

00:37:51.040 make sure

00:37:51.420 that the

00:37:51.840 person putting

00:37:52.360 it in the

00:37:52.660 box is

00:37:53.700 probably the

00:37:55.560 person, the

00:37:56.780 same person.

00:37:58.200 Now if he

00:37:58.860 can come up

00:37:59.380 with that,

00:37:59.840 and even if

00:38:00.360 those videos

00:38:00.960 are grainy,

00:38:03.060 if it looks

00:38:03.820 like it could

00:38:04.440 be that

00:38:04.820 person and

00:38:05.620 the geo

00:38:06.600 tracking says

00:38:07.320 it is, I

00:38:08.460 would buy

00:38:08.800 that argument.

00:38:10.100 That would

00:38:10.520 be pretty

00:38:11.100 solid proof.

00:38:13.080 But you

00:38:14.060 haven't seen

00:38:14.500 it yet,

00:38:14.900 have you?

00:38:15.240 Unless you

00:38:16.720 see that,

00:38:18.220 the criticism

00:38:18.860 is stronger

00:38:19.620 than the

00:38:20.060 argument.

00:38:22.660 That's where

00:38:23.380 I'm at

00:38:23.700 today.

00:38:25.380 My current

00:38:26.320 view is

00:38:28.120 that until

00:38:28.600 you have at

00:38:29.280 least one

00:38:29.800 video showing

00:38:30.880 somebody doing

00:38:31.580 it to ten

00:38:32.080 boxes with

00:38:32.880 some confirmation,

00:38:34.360 without that,

00:38:36.220 the criticism

00:38:36.940 is still a

00:38:38.060 little bit

00:38:38.380 stronger than

00:38:39.060 the movie

00:38:39.440 is.

00:38:40.540 I would

00:38:40.860 put the

00:38:41.160 criticism as

00:38:41.960 stronger than

00:38:42.480 the claim

00:38:42.980 for now.

00:38:44.180 But remember,

00:38:46.060 Dinesh says

00:38:46.640 he can

00:38:46.920 produce this.

00:38:48.540 Now the

00:38:48.900 other criticism

00:38:49.540 is show

00:38:50.240 us the

00:38:50.560 data.

00:38:51.840 You've

00:38:52.240 told us

00:38:52.600 the result,

00:38:53.400 but we

00:38:54.040 need to

00:38:54.340 see the

00:38:54.640 data.

00:38:55.380 How's

00:38:55.700 that

00:38:55.880 criticism?

00:38:57.200 Very

00:38:57.500 good.

00:38:58.580 It's good.

00:38:59.740 So until

00:39:00.460 you have

00:39:00.960 access to

00:39:01.500 the data,

00:39:02.300 and other

00:39:02.680 people say,

00:39:03.340 oh, it

00:39:03.540 does say

00:39:03.860 this,

00:39:04.780 and until

00:39:05.280 you can

00:39:05.540 see one

00:39:05.980 video,

00:39:07.560 ideally you'd

00:39:08.280 want more

00:39:08.680 than one,

00:39:09.440 of somebody

00:39:10.180 who's clearly

00:39:10.860 doing this

00:39:12.200 activity,

00:39:13.560 I would

00:39:13.920 say the

00:39:14.540 criticisms are

00:39:16.900 slightly stronger

00:39:17.620 than the

00:39:17.980 movie right

00:39:18.980 now.

00:39:20.900 But wait,

00:39:22.580 hold your

00:39:24.240 opinion,

00:39:25.520 because Dinesh

00:39:26.860 says he can

00:39:27.420 produce exactly

00:39:28.360 what you're

00:39:28.760 asking for.

00:39:30.000 Now if he

00:39:30.600 produces that,

00:39:32.240 I would say

00:39:32.840 that the

00:39:33.540 movie is

00:39:34.000 stronger than

00:39:34.520 the criticism.

00:39:36.500 Is that

00:39:37.100 fair?

00:39:38.020 Is that a

00:39:38.740 fair analysis?

00:39:39.380 that if he

00:39:40.760 produces an

00:39:41.400 answer to

00:39:41.800 these

00:39:42.000 criticisms,

00:39:43.180 probably then

00:39:44.440 the movie is

00:39:44.940 going to be

00:39:45.200 stronger than

00:39:45.700 the criticisms.

00:39:47.240 I would

00:39:47.860 guess they

00:39:49.080 are at

00:39:49.660 that point.

00:39:51.540 All right?

00:39:53.080 Somebody says

00:39:53.720 not fair, but

00:39:54.320 most of you

00:39:54.700 said that's

00:39:55.060 fair.

00:39:55.700 So we'll

00:39:56.100 wait and

00:39:56.580 see.

00:39:57.160 We're going

00:39:57.800 to give

00:39:58.060 Dinesh his

00:39:58.760 full

00:39:59.260 opportunity to

00:40:04.560 make the

00:40:05.060 case.

00:40:06.920 All right.

00:40:09.380 Kyle Bass,

00:40:12.880 who's a

00:40:13.420 big China

00:40:14.080 critic,

00:40:15.080 as big as

00:40:17.060 I am,

00:40:18.460 so he's

00:40:19.040 very well

00:40:19.800 known for

00:40:20.280 criticizing

00:40:20.860 China,

00:40:22.120 says China

00:40:22.800 is preparing

00:40:23.360 for war.

00:40:25.400 Uh-oh.

00:40:27.080 Let me read

00:40:27.840 his tweet,

00:40:28.440 see if you

00:40:28.960 are convinced.

00:40:30.580 So Kyle

00:40:31.080 Bass says,

00:40:31.540 China is

00:40:31.880 preparing for

00:40:32.400 war.

00:40:33.000 First,

00:40:33.760 Xi orders

00:40:35.000 Chinese banks

00:40:35.680 to risk,

00:40:36.240 assess,

00:40:36.580 and insulate

00:40:37.560 against

00:40:38.040 potential

00:40:38.640 U.S.

00:40:39.440 sanctions.

00:40:41.160 Now Xi is

00:40:41.720 directing Chinese

00:40:42.440 nationals overseas

00:40:43.400 to divest of

00:40:44.480 any assets.

00:40:46.180 China has

00:40:46.700 been hoarding

00:40:47.280 grain for

00:40:47.900 over a

00:40:48.260 year.

00:40:50.520 The playbook

00:40:51.080 is,

00:40:51.880 Xi's playbook

00:40:52.800 is obvious to

00:40:53.420 anyone willing

00:40:53.900 to connect

00:40:54.380 the dots.

00:40:55.080 In January

00:40:55.540 2020,

00:40:56.840 China updated

00:40:57.540 their, quote,

00:40:58.100 foreign investment

00:40:58.920 law, which

00:41:00.140 gives Beijing

00:41:00.680 the power and

00:41:01.220 ability to

00:41:01.740 nationalize

00:41:02.540 foreign assets

00:41:03.400 and investments

00:41:04.680 under special

00:41:05.980 circumstances

00:41:06.680 which would

00:41:07.180 include war.

00:41:08.720 In mid-2021,

00:41:10.180 Kyle Bass

00:41:10.660 says,

00:41:11.440 China's new

00:41:11.920 counter-foreign

00:41:12.480 sanctions law

00:41:13.180 enables Beijing

00:41:14.860 to seize

00:41:15.500 corporate assets

00:41:16.320 and detain

00:41:17.480 expat employees

00:41:18.460 if the underlying

00:41:19.440 corporation simply

00:41:20.460 is complying

00:41:21.800 with foreign

00:41:22.420 sanctions.

00:41:24.480 That's a pretty

00:41:25.200 big deal.

00:41:26.160 If you're even

00:41:26.740 complying with

00:41:27.520 sanctions,

00:41:28.120 China can close

00:41:28.800 you down.

00:41:30.640 And then Kyle

00:41:31.320 Bass says,

00:41:31.860 the groundwork

00:41:32.360 is being laid

00:41:32.920 for a complete

00:41:33.440 seizure of

00:41:34.180 foreign assets

00:41:34.900 and investment

00:41:35.580 in China.

00:41:36.660 If you're an

00:41:37.440 institutional

00:41:38.000 fiduciary or

00:41:38.840 any other

00:41:39.240 fiduciary,

00:41:40.340 you better

00:41:40.720 rethink your

00:41:41.460 risk assessment

00:41:42.400 of investing

00:41:43.220 in public

00:41:43.880 or private

00:41:44.540 Chinese companies.

00:41:47.240 And then he

00:41:47.500 points out

00:41:47.860 investors lost

00:41:48.540 everything in

00:41:49.040 Russia and

00:41:49.420 have tried to

00:41:49.980 sweep it under

00:41:50.440 the rug.

00:41:51.360 They won't be

00:41:51.840 able to hide

00:41:52.320 the hundreds of

00:41:52.980 billions that

00:41:53.480 will be lost

00:41:54.080 in Chinese

00:41:54.780 investments.

00:41:56.260 Now, knowing

00:41:56.720 that Kyle

00:41:57.640 Bass is as

00:41:58.400 big a critic

00:41:59.200 of China as

00:42:00.020 I am,

00:42:01.320 do you

00:42:02.420 think this

00:42:04.300 is China

00:42:04.720 preparing for

00:42:05.480 war?

00:42:06.540 I think

00:42:07.260 yes, but

00:42:08.880 preparing for

00:42:09.660 war is

00:42:10.200 different than

00:42:10.660 planning for

00:42:11.340 war.

00:42:13.240 It looks like

00:42:14.160 they're doing

00:42:14.640 things which

00:42:15.380 just would

00:42:15.840 make sense

00:42:16.560 because they're

00:42:18.380 watching what's

00:42:18.940 happening in the

00:42:19.500 world and

00:42:19.900 they're saying,

00:42:20.300 uh-oh, this

00:42:21.600 could come at

00:42:23.280 us.

00:42:23.960 So I think what

00:42:24.640 they're doing is

00:42:25.140 just mutually

00:42:25.880 assured destruction

00:42:26.840 and protecting

00:42:28.360 their situation.

00:42:30.300 So it looks

00:42:30.720 like just

00:42:31.060 protection.

00:42:33.280 But it is

00:42:34.200 nonetheless true

00:42:35.280 that they're

00:42:35.680 preparing for

00:42:36.400 war because

00:42:38.060 war would be

00:42:38.740 the primary

00:42:39.360 reason that

00:42:40.060 any of this

00:42:40.540 would be

00:42:40.980 activated.

00:42:45.320 All right.

00:42:48.740 So keep an

00:42:49.620 eye on that.

00:42:51.760 The war on

00:42:52.600 Ukraine has

00:42:53.320 been reduced

00:42:53.900 to minor

00:42:55.740 headlines now.

00:42:56.840 And the

00:42:57.140 minor headline

00:42:57.780 was, Russia

00:42:58.620 claims total

00:42:59.440 control of

00:43:00.180 Mariupol.

00:43:01.460 Now, there's

00:43:02.380 not much left

00:43:03.080 of Mariupol,

00:43:03.780 is there?

00:43:05.180 So, I mean,

00:43:06.360 they own a

00:43:06.940 city that's

00:43:07.440 destroyed.

00:43:10.020 But here's the

00:43:10.820 other thing.

00:43:11.200 Can they hold

00:43:11.720 it?

00:43:13.460 Isn't it my

00:43:14.300 understanding that

00:43:15.080 Russia has a

00:43:16.600 good attacking

00:43:18.200 military, but

00:43:20.560 their holding

00:43:21.900 ground military

00:43:22.940 is sort of

00:43:23.440 lacking and

00:43:24.220 they're not

00:43:24.540 even staffed

00:43:25.220 for it?

00:43:25.560 So I

00:43:26.340 wonder if

00:43:26.880 conquering it

00:43:28.920 even means

00:43:29.500 anything.

00:43:30.680 Because I

00:43:31.640 know it's a

00:43:32.000 major port,

00:43:32.800 so it's

00:43:33.040 strategically

00:43:33.540 important, but

00:43:34.700 can they

00:43:34.980 hold it?

00:43:36.980 I feel like

00:43:38.020 they're going

00:43:39.400 to be sitting

00:43:40.300 ducks.

00:43:41.040 Because if the

00:43:41.640 Russians hold

00:43:42.220 it, the

00:43:42.900 targets would

00:43:43.420 be kind of

00:43:43.820 obvious.

00:43:45.340 And it

00:43:45.940 seems like the

00:43:46.540 Ukrainian

00:43:47.280 resistance or

00:43:49.360 whatever would

00:43:49.940 just be able to

00:43:50.600 hammer the

00:43:51.800 Russians while

00:43:53.700 they're trying to

00:43:54.180 hold Mariupol.

00:43:56.580 Imagine being

00:43:57.900 the Russian

00:43:58.480 occupying force

00:44:00.500 in Mariupol.

00:44:02.240 Every time you

00:44:02.960 went outdoors,

00:44:04.900 there would be

00:44:05.360 a drone there.

00:44:07.220 There would be a

00:44:08.100 drone on your

00:44:08.700 ass every time

00:44:09.780 you walked

00:44:10.180 outdoors.

00:44:11.460 If you tried to

00:44:12.280 get together,

00:44:12.900 the drones would

00:44:13.540 bomb the

00:44:14.180 building.

00:44:15.160 So if you

00:44:15.760 were trying to

00:44:16.780 hold Mariupol

00:44:18.680 and you're a

00:44:19.160 Russian military,

00:44:20.500 you're going

00:44:21.740 to have to

00:44:22.440 look in the

00:44:24.260 sky every

00:44:24.880 day, every

00:44:25.800 time you

00:44:26.140 walk outside.

00:44:26.980 Because there's

00:44:27.440 going to be a

00:44:27.820 drone up there

00:44:28.460 looking to

00:44:29.820 kill you.

00:44:33.380 All right, so

00:44:34.180 there's a

00:44:35.240 rumor that the

00:44:35.940 Roe versus

00:44:36.320 Wade decision is

00:44:37.100 coming as early

00:44:37.680 as Monday and

00:44:38.460 hell will break

00:44:39.380 loose and

00:44:39.980 Biden

00:44:40.780 administration is

00:44:41.640 preparing for

00:44:42.560 some kind of

00:44:44.920 violence from

00:44:47.040 their own team,

00:44:47.720 I guess, from

00:44:48.240 the left.

00:44:48.640 Now, how

00:44:53.600 many of you

00:44:54.100 think that the

00:44:54.780 final decision

00:44:55.600 will equal the

00:44:56.700 leaked version?

00:44:59.800 How many

00:45:00.520 think the real

00:45:01.260 decision will be

00:45:02.160 basically the

00:45:03.000 leaked version,

00:45:03.800 give or take

00:45:04.640 some minor edits?

00:45:06.840 Mostly yes.

00:45:08.880 Or close to it,

00:45:09.840 probably.

00:45:10.820 Probably.

00:45:12.240 Probably.

00:45:13.240 But I remind

00:45:14.440 you that one of

00:45:15.840 my worst

00:45:16.420 predictions was

00:45:17.680 that the

00:45:18.620 the original

00:45:19.440 leak was fake.

00:45:21.280 But I included

00:45:22.240 in fake, it

00:45:24.420 could be an

00:45:24.820 early draft that

00:45:25.680 doesn't represent

00:45:26.580 the final decision.

00:45:28.680 So I'm going to

00:45:29.540 stick with my

00:45:30.180 decision, or not

00:45:31.060 decision, but my

00:45:32.000 prediction, which

00:45:33.100 has already been

00:45:34.100 debunked.

00:45:36.280 This will be the

00:45:36.800 second time I've

00:45:37.500 done that.

00:45:38.580 The first time was

00:45:39.460 when Kamala Harris

00:45:40.380 got kicked down

00:45:41.440 in the primaries,

00:45:43.080 and I stayed with

00:45:43.880 my decision that

00:45:44.660 she would be

00:45:45.100 president.

00:45:45.420 which turned

00:45:49.440 out to be

00:45:49.840 weirdly sort

00:45:50.680 of right while

00:45:51.300 being wrong.

00:45:54.360 I think there's

00:45:56.060 a non-zero

00:45:56.840 chance that the

00:45:57.900 decision won't be

00:45:58.760 what you saw.

00:46:00.680 What do you

00:46:01.320 think?

00:46:02.240 Is there

00:46:02.700 non-zero?

00:46:04.660 I think it's

00:46:05.320 low.

00:46:07.000 If I were going

00:46:07.700 to put my money

00:46:08.360 on it, I would

00:46:08.940 bet that that

00:46:09.540 decision ends up

00:46:10.400 being just what

00:46:11.200 you saw.

00:46:12.260 You know, some

00:46:12.640 version of it

00:46:13.220 would be just

00:46:13.620 I think it's

00:46:14.460 low.

00:46:15.660 Five percent

00:46:16.340 maybe.

00:46:18.620 And remember,

00:46:20.260 part of why it

00:46:21.440 might have been

00:46:21.860 leaked is to

00:46:23.140 judge public

00:46:23.820 reaction.

00:46:26.440 And if you

00:46:26.900 think that the

00:46:27.480 Supreme Court

00:46:28.280 doesn't respond

00:46:29.300 to the public's

00:46:31.760 emotions, well

00:46:32.940 then you're

00:46:33.240 wrong.

00:46:34.520 You're wrong.

00:46:35.560 They do make

00:46:36.680 law based on

00:46:37.700 public emotions.

00:46:39.980 They just argue

00:46:41.320 it in legal

00:46:42.180 terms, but

00:46:42.780 basically, they

00:46:44.360 are very

00:46:44.760 sensitive to

00:46:45.460 the will of

00:46:46.940 the people,

00:46:47.660 just indirectly.

00:46:50.880 You're sick of

00:46:51.740 Scott being so

00:46:52.440 cocky about

00:46:53.020 Ukraine.

00:46:54.120 What part is

00:46:54.900 cocky?

00:46:58.940 What would

00:46:59.760 be my

00:47:00.180 cocky, I

00:47:01.160 just want to

00:47:01.540 see what, what

00:47:03.240 did I say

00:47:03.880 that's cocky

00:47:04.520 about Ukraine?

00:47:05.520 I literally

00:47:06.160 said that it

00:47:07.640 was one of my

00:47:08.200 worst predictions.

00:47:09.180 I say it over

00:47:09.780 and over again.

00:47:11.320 They're going

00:47:14.480 to keep it.

00:47:17.000 All right,

00:47:17.380 well, I

00:47:18.060 guess, that

00:47:18.900 sounds like

00:47:19.300 maybe there's

00:47:19.700 a problem

00:47:20.040 on your

00:47:20.360 side.

00:47:21.780 Because being

00:47:23.120 cocky and

00:47:24.020 confessing that

00:47:24.840 you're wrong

00:47:25.320 about it seems

00:47:26.100 somewhat opposite.

00:47:28.620 That's a weird

00:47:29.340 comment.

00:47:31.000 All right.

00:47:31.320 I'm less of a

00:47:38.240 true optimist

00:47:38.920 than I used

00:47:39.380 to be.

00:47:41.080 You get

00:47:41.640 beaten down

00:47:42.120 after a while.

00:47:43.480 Anyway, it

00:47:44.180 looks like

00:47:44.640 Ukraine will

00:47:45.560 remain a

00:47:46.140 country.

00:47:48.180 At this

00:47:48.780 point, how

00:47:49.700 many of you

00:47:50.180 would say

00:47:50.520 that's a

00:47:51.200 statement?

00:47:51.440 They're going

00:47:51.740 to lose

00:47:51.980 territory,

00:47:52.900 probably.

00:47:54.060 But how

00:47:54.380 many of you

00:47:55.100 believe that

00:47:55.860 Ukraine will

00:47:56.400 now remain a

00:47:57.480 sovereign country?

00:47:58.240 pretty much

00:47:59.800 all of you,

00:48:00.200 right?

00:48:01.240 And

00:48:01.640 you'll regret

00:48:09.860 openly calling

00:48:10.600 for the

00:48:11.020 killing of

00:48:11.520 Russia.

00:48:12.900 What?

00:48:14.180 You'll regret

00:48:15.060 openly calling

00:48:15.980 for the

00:48:16.360 killing of

00:48:16.820 Russia.

00:48:17.220 Did I do

00:48:17.580 that?

00:48:18.420 Did anybody

00:48:19.160 see me openly

00:48:20.060 calling for the

00:48:21.040 killing of

00:48:21.700 Russia?

00:48:23.120 When did

00:48:23.680 that happen?

00:48:25.140 Have you

00:48:25.460 ever noticed

00:48:25.860 that almost

00:48:26.280 all of my

00:48:26.760 critics are

00:48:27.560 criticizing

00:48:28.120 some

00:48:28.460 imaginary

00:48:28.920 thing?

00:48:30.060 It's just

00:48:30.420 the weirdest

00:48:30.800 thing.

00:48:31.120 I almost

00:48:32.280 never,

00:48:33.880 rarely if

00:48:35.200 ever,

00:48:35.440 I can't

00:48:35.740 even remember

00:48:36.160 the last

00:48:36.480 time I was

00:48:36.880 criticized for

00:48:37.560 something I

00:48:38.040 actually did.

00:48:39.400 Because when

00:48:39.840 I'm criticized

00:48:40.320 for things I

00:48:41.020 actually do,

00:48:42.560 such as my

00:48:43.260 incorrect prediction

00:48:44.260 about the

00:48:44.680 invasion,

00:48:46.200 I embrace it

00:48:47.240 completely.

00:48:48.080 Yeah, that was

00:48:48.460 totally wrong.

00:48:52.640 All right.

00:48:53.440 Yeah, Putin

00:48:54.000 versus Russia.

00:48:55.500 It's a different

00:48:56.040 calculation.

00:48:58.120 Anyway, we'll

00:49:01.340 see if we're

00:49:01.700 over the first

00:49:02.420 way.

00:49:02.660 It looks like

00:49:03.080 what we

00:49:03.380 thought it

00:49:03.640 would be.

00:49:08.440 What else

00:49:09.120 is going on

00:49:09.720 here?

00:49:12.540 So,

00:49:14.120 listening to,

00:49:15.240 I guess,

00:49:16.180 the ongoing

00:49:17.520 investigation into

00:49:19.860 what happened

00:49:20.420 with 2020 and

00:49:21.520 the Russia

00:49:22.420 collusion thing.

00:49:23.140 So this is

00:49:24.060 Jonathan

00:49:24.460 Turley's take

00:49:25.340 talking about

00:49:26.960 the Alpha

00:49:27.420 Bank story.

00:49:28.200 So it was a

00:49:28.580 fake story that

00:49:30.060 was trying to

00:49:30.620 be pushed by

00:49:31.380 the Clinton

00:49:32.040 campaign lawyer,

00:49:33.860 I guess.

00:49:34.900 And Turley

00:49:35.400 says,

00:49:35.880 this Alpha

00:49:36.320 Bank story

00:49:36.840 was pushed

00:49:37.320 by Jake

00:49:37.900 Sullivan,

00:49:38.720 now the

00:49:39.280 national security

00:49:40.280 advisor,

00:49:41.240 and by

00:49:41.700 Clinton

00:49:42.060 herself.

00:49:43.100 But the

00:49:43.640 thing to keep

00:49:44.140 in mind is

00:49:44.680 that President

00:49:45.100 Obama was

00:49:45.780 briefed when

00:49:46.460 he was

00:49:46.720 president.

00:49:47.140 That Hillary

00:49:48.360 Clinton was

00:49:48.980 planning to

00:49:49.500 make a Russia

00:49:50.040 collusion claim

00:49:50.900 against Donald

00:49:51.600 Trump to

00:49:53.040 try to sort

00:49:53.800 of get out

00:49:55.040 of her own

00:49:55.500 email issues

00:49:56.220 during the

00:49:56.680 campaign.

00:49:57.700 And we now

00:49:58.300 have someone

00:49:58.740 saying,

00:49:59.880 quote,

00:50:00.340 yeah,

00:50:00.580 she green-lighted

00:50:01.560 the Alpha

00:50:01.900 Bank claim,

00:50:03.360 which were

00:50:03.800 completely

00:50:04.260 without

00:50:04.620 foundation.

00:50:06.400 So,

00:50:07.260 Obama knew

00:50:09.300 about this?

00:50:11.360 Now,

00:50:11.760 we assumed

00:50:12.940 or we

00:50:13.300 suspected

00:50:13.800 he did,

00:50:14.260 right?

00:50:14.580 But now we

00:50:15.140 have confirmation,

00:50:16.140 don't we?

00:50:17.160 We have

00:50:17.500 confirmation,

00:50:18.080 at least

00:50:18.480 according to

00:50:18.940 Jonathan

00:50:19.360 Turley's

00:50:19.820 interpretation.

00:50:20.900 confirmation

00:50:21.460 that Obama

00:50:23.280 was briefed

00:50:24.520 that there

00:50:24.880 would be

00:50:25.280 like an

00:50:25.820 illegal,

00:50:27.360 well,

00:50:27.660 not illegal,

00:50:28.340 I guess,

00:50:28.680 but an

00:50:29.480 illegitimate

00:50:30.140 claim.

00:50:31.860 And he

00:50:32.540 apparently was

00:50:33.200 okay with it

00:50:34.460 because he

00:50:35.420 let it

00:50:35.700 happen.

00:50:38.480 I would

00:50:39.140 say that

00:50:39.500 puts Obama

00:50:41.220 in the

00:50:42.060 most disgraced

00:50:43.460 president list.

00:50:45.420 I think

00:50:45.780 you'd have to

00:50:46.180 throw Obama

00:50:46.760 in there with

00:50:47.260 Nixon at

00:50:48.080 this point,

00:50:49.180 wouldn't you?

00:50:49.600 what would

00:50:51.020 really be

00:50:51.380 the difference

00:50:51.820 between what

00:50:52.420 Nixon did

00:50:53.040 and what

00:50:53.480 Obama did

00:50:54.260 if this

00:50:54.760 is true?

00:50:55.680 If he

00:50:56.180 was okay

00:50:57.620 with Hillary

00:50:58.740 Clinton

00:50:59.520 trying to

00:51:01.160 effect an

00:51:02.160 election with

00:51:02.760 a fake

00:51:03.420 story about

00:51:04.140 Russian

00:51:04.420 collusion,

00:51:05.900 if this

00:51:06.680 is true,

00:51:08.380 then he's

00:51:09.000 just Richard

00:51:09.620 Nixon and

00:51:10.440 fuck him

00:51:10.840 forever.

00:51:12.560 Am I

00:51:13.300 right?

00:51:13.500 Now,

00:51:15.120 keep in

00:51:15.440 mind,

00:51:15.880 I want to

00:51:16.240 be clear,

00:51:17.240 I supported

00:51:18.200 Obama for

00:51:19.660 president.

00:51:20.860 I thought it

00:51:21.540 was a good

00:51:21.900 move.

00:51:23.200 And actually,

00:51:23.940 there's some

00:51:24.320 things he did

00:51:24.840 that I thought

00:51:25.240 were pretty

00:51:25.780 solid.

00:51:27.060 But if

00:51:27.760 this is

00:51:28.160 true,

00:51:29.340 if this

00:51:29.820 is true,

00:51:31.400 fuck him

00:51:31.880 forever.

00:51:33.260 You don't

00:51:33.660 get over

00:51:34.940 this.

00:51:35.980 Now,

00:51:36.280 the other

00:51:36.540 thing that he

00:51:36.940 did that I

00:51:37.880 suggested he

00:51:38.700 should be

00:51:39.000 impeached

00:51:39.400 for was,

00:51:42.040 remember when

00:51:42.620 he said he

00:51:43.460 wouldn't

00:51:43.780 touch

00:51:44.200 marijuana

00:51:45.680 dispensaries,

00:51:47.140 and then he

00:51:47.940 got elected

00:51:48.460 and then he

00:51:49.000 went after

00:51:49.380 marijuana

00:51:49.860 dispensaries

00:51:50.540 in my

00:51:50.920 state,

00:51:51.860 to which I

00:51:52.620 said,

00:51:53.380 okay,

00:51:53.640 well,

00:51:53.840 what's your

00:51:54.180 reason?

00:51:55.320 Why did you

00:51:55.880 change your

00:51:56.340 mind?

00:51:57.400 And he

00:51:57.660 never gave

00:51:58.100 a reason.

00:51:59.560 Never.

00:52:00.440 To this

00:52:00.840 day,

00:52:01.180 he's never

00:52:01.580 given a

00:52:02.000 reason.

00:52:03.620 What's it

00:52:04.180 mean when

00:52:04.500 you don't

00:52:04.820 give a

00:52:05.120 reason?

00:52:07.100 It means

00:52:07.720 you're

00:52:07.900 corrupt.

00:52:09.000 It means

00:52:09.560 you can't

00:52:09.980 give a

00:52:10.280 reason.

00:52:10.860 It means

00:52:11.160 somebody

00:52:11.480 bought

00:52:11.760 you.

00:52:13.360 So I

00:52:14.200 said that

00:52:14.860 Obama should

00:52:15.460 have been

00:52:15.720 impeached for

00:52:16.600 not giving

00:52:17.100 a reason.

00:52:18.860 It's one

00:52:19.300 thing to

00:52:19.720 say I'm

00:52:20.200 going to

00:52:20.360 put you

00:52:20.680 people from

00:52:21.260 your state

00:52:21.720 in jail and

00:52:22.960 here are my

00:52:23.520 reasons.

00:52:24.420 And I'd say,

00:52:24.820 oh, I like

00:52:25.380 that or I

00:52:25.740 don't like it,

00:52:26.260 but at least

00:52:26.560 he showed

00:52:26.940 your work,

00:52:28.000 and then I

00:52:28.420 could at

00:52:28.660 least trust

00:52:29.100 the system.

00:52:30.720 But you

00:52:32.060 can't trust

00:52:32.580 the system

00:52:33.140 if he did

00:52:35.300 this.

00:52:36.980 All right?

00:52:37.520 I mean,

00:52:37.780 you can't

00:52:38.100 trust Obama

00:52:39.080 at all.

00:52:40.220 So I would

00:52:40.620 say this is

00:52:41.100 the most

00:52:41.540 disgraceful

00:52:42.580 thing I

00:52:43.220 have ever

00:52:45.060 seen a

00:52:45.540 president do.

00:52:47.040 Trying to

00:52:47.720 think of

00:52:48.040 something worse

00:52:48.640 than this.

00:52:49.800 If Obama

00:52:50.560 knew about

00:52:51.520 this and

00:52:51.940 was okay

00:52:52.520 with it,

00:52:53.760 and to

00:52:54.200 this day

00:52:54.680 he's not

00:52:55.160 outing them

00:52:55.660 for doing

00:52:56.060 it,

00:52:56.640 if that

00:52:57.080 really happened,

00:52:59.060 he's our

00:52:59.480 worst president.

00:53:01.340 There would

00:53:01.940 be nothing

00:53:02.400 that Trump

00:53:03.480 did that

00:53:04.060 would be on

00:53:04.420 this level.

00:53:05.840 Let me put it

00:53:06.920 in the cleanest

00:53:07.940 terms.

00:53:08.200 If you

00:53:09.000 accept that

00:53:09.520 this is

00:53:09.860 true,

00:53:10.180 and the

00:53:10.340 evidence is

00:53:10.820 pretty good

00:53:11.600 at this

00:53:11.880 point,

00:53:12.420 that Obama

00:53:13.360 was okay

00:53:13.980 with the

00:53:14.420 Russia

00:53:14.660 collusion

00:53:15.260 hoax being

00:53:16.700 perpetrated,

00:53:18.020 there's nothing

00:53:19.860 that Trump

00:53:20.280 ever did

00:53:20.840 that was

00:53:21.860 that bad.

00:53:24.220 What do

00:53:24.740 you say?

00:53:25.920 Name one

00:53:26.440 thing that

00:53:26.780 Trump did

00:53:27.200 that was

00:53:27.540 this bad.

00:53:28.700 Because if

00:53:29.260 you do,

00:53:29.940 the only

00:53:30.420 people who

00:53:30.820 could do

00:53:31.180 it would

00:53:31.520 be Democrats

00:53:32.840 who thought

00:53:34.000 that something

00:53:34.500 that was a

00:53:35.020 hoax was

00:53:35.480 real.

00:53:36.620 They're

00:53:36.860 going to

00:53:36.940 say,

00:53:37.240 well,

00:53:37.540 certainly

00:53:38.700 the

00:53:39.120 Charlottesville

00:53:39.800 fine people

00:53:40.440 statement

00:53:40.780 was worse,

00:53:41.860 but it

00:53:42.220 didn't

00:53:42.400 happen.

00:53:43.380 That was

00:53:43.720 a hoax.

00:53:44.960 Or,

00:53:45.300 well,

00:53:45.500 he told

00:53:45.940 us to

00:53:46.300 drink

00:53:46.540 bleach.

00:53:47.080 No,

00:53:47.540 that didn't

00:53:47.880 happen.

00:53:48.560 Didn't

00:53:48.800 happen.

00:53:49.140 That was

00:53:49.340 a hoax.

00:53:50.420 Well,

00:53:50.900 he called

00:53:51.680 the country

00:53:52.240 a shithole

00:53:52.740 country.

00:53:53.280 No,

00:53:54.040 that was

00:53:54.380 taken out

00:53:54.780 of context.

00:53:56.420 So there's

00:53:56.900 literally

00:53:57.220 nothing that

00:53:58.460 Trump has

00:53:58.920 ever been

00:53:59.340 confirmed to

00:54:00.360 have done,

00:54:01.600 like this

00:54:02.180 level of

00:54:02.620 confirmation,

00:54:03.980 that would

00:54:04.380 rise to

00:54:04.940 this level.

00:54:05.480 I can't

00:54:07.900 think of

00:54:08.140 anything.

00:54:14.680 You think

00:54:15.380 Carter was,

00:54:16.100 Obama was

00:54:16.740 the worst?

00:54:18.960 Yeah.

00:54:20.740 Woodrow

00:54:21.160 Wilson

00:54:21.520 jailing

00:54:22.160 critics.

00:54:22.660 Okay,

00:54:22.900 that would

00:54:23.160 be pretty

00:54:23.500 bad.

00:54:25.040 But I

00:54:25.680 think that

00:54:26.100 the Russia

00:54:27.320 collusion

00:54:27.780 thing could

00:54:28.400 have jailed

00:54:29.000 critics if

00:54:29.840 it worked

00:54:30.140 out.

00:54:31.120 So I'd

00:54:31.660 say that's

00:54:31.960 worse.

00:54:33.320 So Hillary

00:54:34.020 Clinton,

00:54:34.780 worst person

00:54:35.300 in the

00:54:35.540 world,

00:54:36.120 Obama,

00:54:36.680 number

00:54:36.940 two.

00:54:38.180 That's

00:54:38.520 my final

00:54:38.960 vote.

00:54:41.760 George

00:54:42.280 Washington

00:54:42.660 was the

00:54:43.100 worst.

00:54:43.860 He had

00:54:44.100 slaves.

00:54:45.840 I guess

00:54:46.520 if you're a

00:54:46.880 slave owner,

00:54:47.460 technically,

00:54:48.140 you're worse.

00:54:49.860 I will

00:54:50.440 accept that

00:54:51.100 reframe.

00:54:51.620 All right,

00:55:01.180 just looking at

00:55:01.660 your comments

00:55:02.080 for a

00:55:02.400 moment.

00:55:07.240 All right,

00:55:07.880 I think we've

00:55:08.480 done it.

00:55:09.240 I believe I

00:55:09.960 have achieved

00:55:10.380 my objective

00:55:10.960 of the best

00:55:11.820 live stream in

00:55:12.800 the history of

00:55:13.280 civilization.

00:55:14.500 And before you

00:55:15.020 argue with me,

00:55:15.660 I think I'll

00:55:16.180 shut down the

00:55:16.880 live stream over

00:55:17.480 here on YouTube.

00:55:18.800 You know it's

00:55:19.200 true.

00:55:19.580 It's true.

00:55:21.180 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 21, 2022

Episode 1750 Scott Adams： Biden's War On Babies, Musk Mandates And Hillary Gets Away With Everything

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript