Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1750 Scott Adams： Biden's War On Babies, Musk Mandates And Hillary Gets Away With Everything

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:10.860 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I think we'd all agree that nothing has ever been better.

00:00:16.260 And if you'd like to take it up to a stratospheric, multidimensional level,

00:00:22.980 and I know you're the kind of people who do that, am I right?

00:00:26.760 Do you settle for ordinary? No. You wouldn't be here if you did.

00:00:32.900 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice, a canteen jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.280 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:44.940 And join me now, if you will, for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:48.780 It's the dopamine hit of the day with a hint of oxytocin.

00:00:52.680 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and wow, is it going to just set you free today.

00:00:58.920 Go! 0.95

00:01:07.000 Perfection.

00:01:09.460 I'll tell you, when you've been drinking crappy hotel coffee for a week,

00:01:14.080 the good stuff really tastes good, am I right?

00:01:18.560 How many of you have heard of the co-hanger test that's going around TikTok?

00:01:24.600 Has anybody heard of that?

00:01:27.020 Heard about it for the first time today.

00:01:28.640 No, it's not about abortion.

00:01:30.700 Stop it. Stop it. 1.00

00:01:32.960 No, there's a little test, which apparently is based on science,

00:01:36.700 in which you take a co-hanger that can stretch,

00:01:39.860 so it'd have to be the kind that stretches.

00:01:42.760 And you stretch the wide part, and you put it on your head,

00:01:46.640 and then once it's on your head,

00:01:48.480 it causes you to involuntarily turn to one side.

00:01:53.520 And people don't believe it's real, and they'll put it on their head,

00:01:56.080 and as soon as they put it on their head, it will go,

00:01:57.760 and they'll be like, what?

00:02:00.920 So I was planning to do the challenge for you live,

00:02:04.880 but I thought to myself,

00:02:07.820 I think I'd better test this before I do it on live,

00:02:11.660 although it'd be funnier if it failed live.

00:02:13.960 So I found myself the only co-hanger I could find 0.61

00:02:18.220 that would bend in this house, because I have mostly wooden ones,

00:02:21.220 and I stretched it, and I put it on my head,

00:02:25.260 and now I'm told that 98% of people

00:02:28.500 will experience this head turn,

00:02:30.600 but apparently I'm in the top 2% again,

00:02:35.260 or the bottom 2%, depending on your perspective,

00:02:38.260 because I didn't feel anything,

00:02:39.880 and then I thought, is this a prank?

00:02:43.080 This isn't even real, is it?

00:02:45.980 I don't know.

00:02:47.180 It sounded like a prank,

00:02:48.760 because am I in the 2%?

00:02:53.100 I mean, did somebody actually get me

00:02:54.580 to put a co-hanger on my head?

00:02:56.720 I feel like I got pranked,

00:02:58.660 but if anybody's tried it, let me know.

00:03:01.140 I might try a different co-hanger just to find out.

00:03:05.260 I heard an argument

00:03:06.320 that was a good counter to my argument,

00:03:10.280 and you like it when I'm wrong, don't you?

00:03:13.520 Or at least you like it when I point out

00:03:15.240 that there's an argument that's better than my argument.

00:03:18.000 Now, I don't know if it's better,

00:03:19.700 but I had not heard it before,

00:03:22.300 and it had to do with my argument

00:03:24.500 that logically,

00:03:27.340 if we knew that the amount of initial viral load

00:03:30.740 made a difference to your outcomes,

00:03:33.080 that masks would at least work that well,

00:03:35.920 even if everybody got infected,

00:03:38.260 some people would get less of a severe outcome,

00:03:41.280 because maybe the mask

00:03:42.260 prevented some of the load

00:03:44.220 from going in your face.

00:03:47.000 Well, Anatoly Lubarsky

00:03:48.560 had a counter to that argument,

00:03:50.040 which I don't know if it's right,

00:03:53.080 but I consider it well-worthy enough to repeat.

00:03:56.920 So this is attacking my own argument.

00:03:59.560 Everybody ready for this?

00:04:01.320 I will now dismantle my own argument.

00:04:03.760 It goes like this.

00:04:05.400 If it's true that the amount of initial virus

00:04:07.980 makes a big difference to outcomes,

00:04:10.340 we probably would have seen it in the data, right?

00:04:12.760 So this is the first question,

00:04:14.580 and I don't think we did.

00:04:15.580 So at the macro level,

00:04:18.140 it doesn't look like there's any big difference.

00:04:20.700 If there's a difference,

00:04:22.260 maybe somebody's teasing it out with statistics,

00:04:25.420 but it's not big enough

00:04:26.700 to warrant the mandates, in my opinion,

00:04:30.780 because it didn't look like it made a difference

00:04:32.280 at any macro level.

00:04:34.740 But I still argued

00:04:36.480 that logically it had to make a difference

00:04:39.300 if we knew this fact,

00:04:41.420 if we knew that the initial dose

00:04:44.040 made a difference.

00:04:46.600 And then Anatoly adds this argument.

00:04:49.240 He says that the viruses

00:04:50.380 essentially replicate in a logarithmic way,

00:04:55.380 meaning really, really quickly,

00:04:58.080 such that the difference of,

00:04:59.800 you know, a few hours or something,

00:05:03.460 over a few hours,

00:05:05.240 you would end up being at maximum virus

00:05:07.920 no matter what.

00:05:09.000 So that the amount of difference

00:05:11.900 between getting a small virus

00:05:13.480 and then it instantly replicates

00:05:15.820 to a huge level

00:05:17.120 versus getting a larger dose

00:05:19.400 in the first place,

00:05:20.880 and then it also replicates

00:05:22.720 to its highest level,

00:05:24.040 there's not much difference in timing.

00:05:26.900 How about that?

00:05:28.780 Now, I would say

00:05:30.680 that's at least worthy of putting on,

00:05:34.740 that's at least equal to my hypothesis.

00:05:37.560 It's at least equal.

00:05:41.080 Hey, Alexa, cancel. 1.00

00:05:44.740 I hate it when my devices wake up

00:05:46.740 and start talking to me.

00:05:49.520 How about that?

00:05:50.820 Would you accept that

00:05:52.540 as a reasonable debunk

00:05:54.220 of my opinion,

00:05:55.840 which I've held for now two years?

00:05:59.100 Reasonable or no?

00:06:01.040 It's reasonable enough

00:06:02.740 to make me rethink my position.

00:06:05.720 That's all.

00:06:07.880 I definitely would rethink it.

00:06:10.360 But we'll see.

00:06:11.620 All right, a little update

00:06:12.960 on the Amber Turd trial.

00:06:15.280 I saw somebody call her Scamber. 0.99

00:06:17.640 Scamber Turd. 0.71

00:06:19.240 That's maybe an upgrade.

00:06:20.680 I don't know.

00:06:21.820 But apparently her own witnesses

00:06:24.120 haven't been so good for her.

00:06:26.860 And it looks like

00:06:28.160 she has proven that

00:06:29.980 she was the abuser. 0.99

00:06:31.220 So if you look at social media,

00:06:34.720 social media seems to have decided

00:06:36.700 that Amber Heard was the abuser.

00:06:39.380 What do you think of that?

00:06:41.440 Now, that doesn't mean

00:06:42.180 the trial will go that way.

00:06:43.380 But social media seems to have decided

00:06:45.140 that she's the abuser.

00:06:48.740 Now, let me tell you something

00:06:50.440 about her alleged personality type.

00:06:54.420 She's in that cluster two 0.99

00:06:57.080 or category two,

00:06:58.380 whatever it is, personality,

00:06:59.660 according to one expert testimony.

00:07:04.040 If you're in that cluster B category,

00:07:07.840 what is one thing you can know

00:07:09.380 about them for sure?

00:07:11.520 Now, you don't know

00:07:12.260 if they did a specific crime.

00:07:14.280 But what is one thing you can know about?

00:07:16.420 Yeah, that's right.

00:07:17.700 Not only do they lie,

00:07:20.340 here's the key.

00:07:21.880 Not only do they lie,

00:07:23.880 they lie about everything.

00:07:26.620 See, that's the thing

00:07:27.360 people don't get.

00:07:29.160 If I told you,

00:07:30.260 oh, Amber Heard has a personality type 1.00

00:07:32.000 where she would be a liar,

00:07:33.860 you say to yourself,

00:07:34.760 well, but she's going to save that,

00:07:36.820 she'll save that lie

00:07:38.080 for the important stuff, right?

00:07:39.460 She's not going to lie

00:07:40.380 about just everything all the time.

00:07:43.120 Nope.

00:07:44.160 Nope.

00:07:44.980 That personality type

00:07:46.320 lies about everything all the time

00:07:47.860 to the point where it's unbelievable.

00:07:49.880 It's like you can't even believe it.

00:07:52.380 Even when there's no purpose to it,

00:07:54.700 there's no point to it,

00:07:55.940 there's nothing gained,

00:07:57.340 just wall-to-wall lying about everything.

00:08:01.540 Now, what happens when you take somebody

00:08:03.200 who's a wall-to-wall liar 0.72

00:08:04.600 and they can't stop?

00:08:07.760 They literally can't stop.

00:08:09.500 That's what the personality type is.

00:08:11.120 They can't stop lying.

00:08:12.720 And then you put them on trial.

00:08:14.280 And you put them under oath.

00:08:17.500 And then you have people

00:08:18.520 who are witnesses

00:08:19.200 to the various things come on.

00:08:20.800 What's going to happen?

00:08:22.600 Well, what's going to happen

00:08:23.480 is what happened to Amber Heard.

00:08:25.580 Amber Turd. 0.91

00:08:28.040 So there were claims such as,

00:08:30.460 you know,

00:08:30.860 one day he broke her nose.

00:08:33.500 And then the defense for,

00:08:35.620 or whatever it is,

00:08:36.720 the attorney for Johnny Depp

00:08:38.540 shows a photo of her

00:08:41.640 on the red carpet

00:08:42.380 the next day looking perfect.

00:08:45.300 And her claim is that

00:08:46.660 he broke her nose.

00:08:51.380 And then there was one other example

00:08:53.840 where it was just as equally obvious

00:08:55.740 that she lied.

00:08:57.820 And I think Johnny Depp

00:09:01.000 is going to win.

00:09:02.520 I think he's going to win.

00:09:04.360 I don't know.

00:09:05.920 So we'll see.

00:09:06.660 But I feel like

00:09:08.980 there's something important

00:09:09.820 happening here

00:09:10.420 because people are learning

00:09:11.360 for the first time

00:09:12.200 that such people exist.

00:09:15.160 How many of you

00:09:16.040 have said to yourself,

00:09:18.080 oh my God,

00:09:18.840 I know somebody

00:09:19.860 who's married to an Amber Heard.

00:09:22.180 Or maybe you were.

00:09:24.560 How many of you said,

00:09:25.960 oh my God, I know her.

00:09:27.600 And I had some,

00:09:28.880 yeah, look at that.

00:09:30.860 My sisters are Heard.

00:09:33.400 Yes.

00:09:33.920 It is a personality type

00:09:37.660 of which there are so many of them.

00:09:40.620 And the problem is

00:09:41.560 that you imagine

00:09:42.520 they're normal

00:09:43.940 and they're not.

00:09:46.920 The people in this personality type

00:09:48.560 are closer to monsters

00:09:51.000 with human DNA

00:09:52.160 than they are with,

00:09:53.240 like, just people.

00:09:54.680 Because they're there to destroy.

00:09:56.660 The average person

00:09:57.800 is there to help out.

00:09:58.760 That's our most natural impulse

00:10:02.440 is you put us in a situation

00:10:04.380 and we'll be like,

00:10:05.020 oh, how can I help?

00:10:06.200 I'll help the tribe,

00:10:07.140 help the family.

00:10:08.200 We're basically

00:10:08.800 a helpful species.

00:10:10.880 But the,

00:10:11.840 that cluster B types

00:10:14.400 are super selfish.

00:10:17.380 So selfish

00:10:18.300 that you can't even,

00:10:19.460 you know, imagine.

00:10:20.920 Like, selfish on a scale

00:10:22.540 that's mind-boggling.

00:10:23.940 And now you know

00:10:26.380 that they're real.

00:10:27.760 And there are lots of them.

00:10:31.060 All right.

00:10:33.840 Richard Grinnell

00:10:34.860 was tweeting

00:10:36.400 about the Pennsylvania vote,

00:10:37.840 which apparently

00:10:38.240 is still not completed.

00:10:40.860 And he said,

00:10:41.780 so this is the

00:10:42.820 Dr. Oz thing, right?

00:10:47.100 So they're still counting votes

00:10:48.340 and he tweets,

00:10:49.540 Pennsylvania voting

00:10:50.300 is totally broken.

00:10:51.620 It doesn't take this long

00:10:52.940 to count.

00:10:53.940 Why are people

00:10:54.840 so silent about this?

00:10:57.720 Isn't it because

00:10:58.480 we've been too beaten up

00:10:59.600 about it?

00:11:00.780 Is that why?

00:11:01.480 Or is it because

00:11:02.000 social media is

00:11:03.000 censoring it

00:11:04.640 in some way

00:11:05.120 we don't know?

00:11:06.760 But I,

00:11:07.680 I did my usual

00:11:08.820 asshole tweet.

00:11:10.260 Whenever I see anything

00:11:11.560 about the election

00:11:12.540 integrity,

00:11:14.520 I,

00:11:15.760 I say something

00:11:16.560 like this.

00:11:17.560 Reminder.

00:11:18.440 So I retweeted

00:11:19.700 Richard Grinnell's tweet.

00:11:21.300 As a reminder,

00:11:22.220 every previously

00:11:22.980 trusted institution

00:11:24.040 in America

00:11:24.740 has been proven corrupt.

00:11:27.040 Except

00:11:27.520 for all 50 states

00:11:29.980 running independent

00:11:30.740 election systems

00:11:31.580 in different ways

00:11:32.260 with different people.

00:11:33.800 Those are fine.

00:11:35.700 So stop asking questions.

00:11:41.620 Really?

00:11:42.920 Really?

00:11:44.260 Yeah.

00:11:44.740 So if you really want

00:11:47.280 to mock

00:11:48.340 reality,

00:11:51.060 try agreeing with it.

00:11:52.960 But agreeing with it

00:11:53.880 really hard.

00:11:54.620 Because that's what I just did.

00:11:56.060 Yes, it's true.

00:11:57.400 Every institution

00:11:58.220 has been proven corrupt

00:11:59.480 except for all 50 states

00:12:01.340 run by different people

00:12:02.380 in different ways.

00:12:03.560 They all nailed it.

00:12:05.360 But wow,

00:12:06.500 pretty big coincidence,

00:12:07.580 isn't it?

00:12:08.460 Yeah.

00:12:08.760 Try saying that

00:12:11.180 to somebody

00:12:11.640 who is absolutely

00:12:12.520 positive the election

00:12:13.560 was appropriate.

00:12:16.080 Just say what I said

00:12:17.120 and watch their reaction.

00:12:19.460 Do you know

00:12:19.800 what they can say

00:12:20.480 to that

00:12:20.800 as a counter to that?

00:12:24.320 Allow me

00:12:25.020 to give you

00:12:25.760 a play

00:12:26.580 in one act.

00:12:29.260 This would be me

00:12:30.260 at a party

00:12:31.640 in which we imagine

00:12:32.480 I drink cocktails

00:12:33.400 which I don't.

00:12:34.660 Here I am

00:12:35.020 with my imaginary cocktail.

00:12:36.140 And a person says to me,

00:12:39.260 oh, that election was fine.

00:12:40.840 The 2020 election was fine.

00:12:42.700 There were no problems.

00:12:43.520 To which I say,

00:12:44.800 yeah, yeah,

00:12:45.480 there were no problems.

00:12:46.520 And that's really incredible.

00:12:49.060 And we should be so lucky

00:12:50.380 because every single institution

00:12:52.380 in America

00:12:52.840 has been shown

00:12:53.540 to be corrupt

00:12:54.160 in the last few years

00:12:55.080 from our intelligence agencies

00:12:57.080 to Congress

00:12:58.120 to the medical

00:12:59.800 and scientific community.

00:13:01.360 Really,

00:13:01.800 every single entity

00:13:03.540 has been shown

00:13:05.020 to be corrupt

00:13:05.680 and even the Democrats,

00:13:07.280 it looks like

00:13:07.700 they ran a giant

00:13:09.000 Russia collusion hoax

00:13:10.420 and they worked

00:13:11.500 with the media.

00:13:12.380 So yeah,

00:13:12.780 every single entity

00:13:13.960 from Congress

00:13:15.480 to the media

00:13:16.140 through science

00:13:17.000 to the FBI

00:13:18.280 and the CIA

00:13:19.340 intel agencies,

00:13:20.960 100% of them

00:13:22.020 are corrupt

00:13:22.660 and we know that.

00:13:23.920 That's beyond question

00:13:24.800 at this point.

00:13:25.700 But,

00:13:26.720 you're right, Bob.

00:13:28.340 All 50 states

00:13:30.320 run independently

00:13:31.560 by their own systems.

00:13:33.940 Very complicated.

00:13:34.720 But all 50 states

00:13:35.900 got it right.

00:13:38.580 And Bob,

00:13:39.780 may I toast to you

00:13:42.600 for your perception,

00:13:45.240 your common sense

00:13:46.440 approach to this,

00:13:47.920 and your,

00:13:48.660 I'd say,

00:13:49.940 your patriotism.

00:13:51.340 Bob,

00:13:51.740 this is to you

00:13:52.340 for correctly pointing out

00:13:53.600 that everything is broken

00:13:55.300 except all 50 states

00:13:56.880 which are operating great.

00:13:58.080 Here's to you, Bob.

00:13:58.720 Bob.

00:13:58.800 And now I'd like to do

00:14:02.900 Bob's reaction.

00:14:05.660 Now I'm Bob.

00:14:09.900 So,

00:14:10.580 so you're a big

00:14:11.980 Trump supporter, huh?

00:14:13.940 No, that's,

00:14:14.580 that's really,

00:14:15.280 that's a little off point.

00:14:17.440 You know,

00:14:18.060 maybe there's some truth

00:14:19.460 to that,

00:14:19.820 but that's really

00:14:20.740 not on point.

00:14:21.540 so you favor

00:14:24.740 the drinking bleach guys

00:14:26.380 while you're saying,

00:14:26.920 no,

00:14:27.960 no,

00:14:28.320 that was a hoax.

00:14:29.560 That was a hoax.

00:14:30.520 Now what I'm saying is,

00:14:31.800 independent of who was running

00:14:33.940 is a comment about

00:14:35.480 just the election system.

00:14:38.300 So,

00:14:38.840 good luck with supporting

00:14:40.520 the Nazi.

00:14:42.120 Good luck.

00:14:42.680 I better fill my drink.

00:14:43.940 Goodbye.

00:14:44.200 Goodbye.

00:14:46.480 And scene.

00:14:47.680 That's every conversation

00:14:53.100 in America,

00:14:54.440 if you use my technique.

00:14:57.600 All right.

00:15:00.460 The Biden administration

00:15:02.500 has decided to boost

00:15:04.340 the carbon removal industry,

00:15:08.540 which is nascent.

00:15:10.920 I have never used that word

00:15:12.840 before in public.

00:15:14.520 It's nascent.

00:15:16.240 Go look it up

00:15:17.020 if you need to.

00:15:18.120 But most of you

00:15:18.740 don't need to.

00:15:20.440 These big carbon

00:15:21.680 sucking machines,

00:15:22.900 you're going to put

00:15:23.240 3.5 billion

00:15:25.020 toward boosting

00:15:25.740 the industry

00:15:26.320 to suck the CO2

00:15:28.300 out of the air

00:15:28.880 to solve climate change.

00:15:33.360 There are three bad takes.

00:15:35.780 If you had any one

00:15:36.940 of these reactions,

00:15:38.760 I might be mocking you

00:15:40.380 for being an NPC.

00:15:42.320 Here are the three bad takes

00:15:43.760 to the story.

00:15:45.060 Number one,

00:15:46.060 it's called trees.

00:15:48.080 It's called trees.

00:15:51.740 Yes,

00:15:52.640 trees do remove

00:15:53.560 carbon dioxide.

00:15:55.840 However,

00:15:56.680 I'm going to point out

00:15:57.840 that if trees

00:15:58.980 would do it

00:15:59.560 well enough,

00:16:00.740 we'd be using trees

00:16:02.740 instead of

00:16:03.720 big, giant,

00:16:04.740 sucking machines.

00:16:05.960 Because the scientists

00:16:07.160 who decided

00:16:07.920 that maybe we needed

00:16:08.920 big, giant,

00:16:10.160 sucking machines,

00:16:11.380 they've heard of trees.

00:16:13.540 They've heard of trees.

00:16:15.840 I know.

00:16:16.600 It's weird.

00:16:17.600 But scientists

00:16:18.440 have heard

00:16:19.920 of trees.

00:16:21.840 So they probably

00:16:22.780 calculated

00:16:23.340 the impact

00:16:24.760 of trees

00:16:25.220 before they made

00:16:25.920 their decision

00:16:26.420 to do it

00:16:26.860 a different way.

00:16:29.100 Bad take number two,

00:16:31.060 that's not going

00:16:31.760 to work.

00:16:33.060 That's not going

00:16:33.840 to work.

00:16:34.920 Come on.

00:16:36.360 How's that going

00:16:37.120 to work?

00:16:37.460 That's never going

00:16:37.960 to work.

00:16:39.100 It's not efficient

00:16:39.880 enough.

00:16:41.820 To which I say,

00:16:43.740 that's why

00:16:44.220 you're testing it.

00:16:45.800 It's $3.45 billion

00:16:47.100 to boost it,

00:16:48.740 but primarily

00:16:49.700 to make sure

00:16:50.400 you're doing it right.

00:16:51.840 Right?

00:16:52.720 How do you know

00:16:53.460 it doesn't work

00:16:54.020 until you try it?

00:16:55.440 It's sort of like

00:16:56.040 those Wright brothers,

00:16:57.740 those bicycle makers,

00:16:59.400 they'll never

00:17:00.040 make a lighter

00:17:00.860 than air aircraft.

00:17:03.420 Well,

00:17:04.280 why don't you

00:17:04.860 let them test it?

00:17:06.660 Maybe they might

00:17:07.380 surprise you.

00:17:08.460 I'm not saying

00:17:09.120 this stuff will work.

00:17:10.980 How the hell

00:17:11.440 would I know?

00:17:12.900 I'm saying

00:17:13.460 that if you can

00:17:14.300 test it

00:17:14.880 at a reasonable

00:17:16.600 cost relative

00:17:17.800 to the problem

00:17:19.100 you're trying

00:17:19.500 to solve,

00:17:20.600 test it.

00:17:22.060 So if you're

00:17:22.640 saying that it

00:17:23.160 won't work,

00:17:24.500 well,

00:17:25.200 you might be

00:17:26.080 an NPC

00:17:26.620 because you don't

00:17:27.980 have to ask

00:17:28.560 will it work.

00:17:30.180 Just say,

00:17:31.000 can't we test it

00:17:32.180 at a reasonable

00:17:33.420 price?

00:17:33.880 And apparently

00:17:34.260 we can.

00:17:35.420 So we'll find

00:17:36.180 out if it works

00:17:36.780 and we'll find

00:17:37.280 out if it can be,

00:17:38.460 the technology

00:17:39.160 can be improved

00:17:40.160 to the point

00:17:40.620 where it's

00:17:40.940 cost efficient.

00:17:41.520 We're not

00:17:42.940 there yet.

00:17:44.040 And then the

00:17:45.020 third bad take

00:17:46.220 is CO2

00:17:48.300 is plant food

00:17:49.420 with lots

00:17:50.580 of O's 0.97

00:17:51.040 for food.

00:17:52.580 Don't you know

00:17:53.480 that CO2

00:17:54.140 is plant food?

00:17:56.460 Yes.

00:17:59.960 Yes,

00:18:00.280 I do know that.

00:18:01.640 Guess who

00:18:02.240 else knows that?

00:18:03.720 I'm just,

00:18:04.320 I'm not sure.

00:18:06.680 Scientists.

00:18:07.120 Scientists have

00:18:09.220 heard of trees.

00:18:11.180 Scientists

00:18:11.540 have heard

00:18:13.460 of CO2

00:18:15.020 being used

00:18:15.640 in greenhouses

00:18:16.260 to boost

00:18:16.740 production.

00:18:17.540 They've heard

00:18:17.940 of it.

00:18:18.760 I know.

00:18:19.700 I know.

00:18:20.740 So I'm thinking

00:18:21.860 they've factored

00:18:23.820 that into

00:18:24.300 their decision

00:18:25.340 making.

00:18:27.720 What happens

00:18:28.680 if these machines

00:18:29.380 are too good

00:18:29.940 and they suck 0.99

00:18:30.420 all the CO2

00:18:31.020 out of the air

00:18:31.720 and then the

00:18:32.680 plants will all

00:18:33.260 die because

00:18:33.880 they need

00:18:34.140 some CO2.

00:18:36.060 Well,

00:18:36.820 I feel like

00:18:37.700 we would pull

00:18:38.340 back before

00:18:39.040 that happened.

00:18:41.120 I don't know.

00:18:42.540 Call me an optimist.

00:18:44.220 But if we saw

00:18:45.080 that our CO2

00:18:46.060 sucking machines

00:18:48.220 were destroying

00:18:49.500 the food supply

00:18:50.920 on Earth,

00:18:51.480 which would be

00:18:51.900 sort of obvious,

00:18:53.760 I feel like

00:18:54.940 we'd pull back.

00:18:56.580 If you think

00:18:57.360 we'd just keep

00:18:57.960 on going,

00:18:59.340 well,

00:19:00.000 I don't know

00:19:00.840 what to say

00:19:01.180 to that.

00:19:01.540 All right,

00:19:04.020 those are

00:19:04.320 your bad

00:19:04.920 takes.

00:19:08.500 So Elon Musk

00:19:09.580 continues to be

00:19:10.360 the most

00:19:10.700 interesting

00:19:11.340 person in the

00:19:12.320 world.

00:19:12.960 So he announced

00:19:13.580 on Twitter

00:19:13.980 that Tesla

00:19:14.460 is building

00:19:14.920 a hardcore,

00:19:15.860 he calls it,

00:19:16.840 hardcore

00:19:17.320 litigation

00:19:17.940 department

00:19:18.420 where we

00:19:18.880 directly initiate

00:19:19.780 and execute

00:19:20.340 lawsuits.

00:19:21.680 The team

00:19:22.320 will report

00:19:22.820 directly to me.

00:19:24.100 Now,

00:19:24.520 this is just

00:19:25.460 a wonderful

00:19:25.980 brushback pitch

00:19:27.020 because you know

00:19:28.280 he's going to

00:19:28.620 be attacked

00:19:29.100 with all manner

00:19:30.060 of accusations

00:19:31.060 the accusation

00:19:32.280 yesterday

00:19:32.700 that he

00:19:34.120 exposed himself

00:19:35.640 to a massage

00:19:37.580 therapist

00:19:38.080 on his private

00:19:38.880 plane.

00:19:39.940 Which,

00:19:40.500 by the way,

00:19:41.700 if you're going

00:19:42.520 to be accused

00:19:43.320 of a crime

00:19:44.040 and you got

00:19:45.060 to choose,

00:19:46.540 I would choose

00:19:47.940 that one.

00:19:49.740 I would like

00:19:50.800 to be accused

00:19:51.700 of exposing

00:19:52.800 myself to

00:19:54.460 my personal

00:19:55.460 massage therapist

00:19:56.640 on my

00:19:57.980 private jet.

00:19:58.620 if I could

00:20:00.680 get that

00:20:01.080 going,

00:20:02.120 that would

00:20:02.300 be like,

00:20:03.140 now,

00:20:03.480 I'm not

00:20:03.780 saying that

00:20:04.260 that's,

00:20:05.140 you know,

00:20:05.760 excusable.

00:20:06.960 If,

00:20:07.500 in fact,

00:20:07.980 he did

00:20:08.360 something

00:20:08.680 inappropriate,

00:20:09.460 well,

00:20:10.680 then I

00:20:11.360 don't support

00:20:12.300 that at all.

00:20:13.180 I'm just

00:20:13.640 saying that

00:20:15.220 if he had

00:20:15.820 to be accused

00:20:16.420 of something,

00:20:17.760 well,

00:20:18.060 that's the

00:20:18.320 one I'd

00:20:18.660 pick.

00:20:20.480 I'm pretty

00:20:21.060 sure I'd

00:20:21.440 pick that

00:20:21.840 one.

00:20:22.440 Like,

00:20:22.720 out of all

00:20:23.140 the things

00:20:23.540 you could

00:20:23.760 be accused

00:20:24.220 of,

00:20:24.440 yeah,

00:20:24.580 I'd take

00:20:24.820 that one.

00:20:25.380 Thank you.

00:20:29.320 But,

00:20:30.020 to me,

00:20:30.940 this looks

00:20:31.280 like Elon

00:20:31.980 Musk 0.77

00:20:32.380 negotiating

00:20:33.260 in public.

00:20:34.360 In this

00:20:34.780 case,

00:20:35.480 I use

00:20:36.100 negotiating

00:20:36.700 loosely to

00:20:38.020 mean he's

00:20:38.680 warning people

00:20:39.480 that if they

00:20:40.000 come after

00:20:40.540 him,

00:20:41.140 it's going

00:20:41.540 to be

00:20:41.740 really

00:20:42.000 expensive.

00:20:43.420 And,

00:20:43.640 by the

00:20:43.860 way,

00:20:44.880 he's the

00:20:45.260 richest

00:20:45.440 person in

00:20:45.960 the world.

00:20:47.040 So,

00:20:47.440 if you'd

00:20:47.680 like to

00:20:48.040 come after

00:20:48.500 somebody

00:20:49.000 with a

00:20:50.280 strategy,

00:20:50.860 a legal

00:20:51.240 strategy,

00:20:52.640 he's

00:20:53.020 basically

00:20:53.460 telling you

00:20:54.140 that at

00:20:55.000 this point

00:20:55.440 he's

00:20:55.740 going to

00:20:56.000 destroy

00:20:56.300 you.

00:20:58.420 He didn't

00:20:59.020 say it

00:20:59.300 directly,

00:21:00.340 but if

00:21:00.820 you've

00:21:01.020 got this

00:21:02.340 hardcore

00:21:02.840 litigation

00:21:03.340 team

00:21:03.920 that's

00:21:04.160 going to

00:21:04.340 be

00:21:04.480 aggressively

00:21:04.960 going

00:21:05.300 after

00:21:05.560 things

00:21:05.980 and

00:21:06.460 reporting

00:21:06.840 directly

00:21:07.300 to

00:21:07.540 Musk,

00:21:08.420 yeah,

00:21:08.920 he's

00:21:09.140 going to

00:21:09.320 make it

00:21:09.600 expensive

00:21:10.060 to mess

00:21:10.980 with him.

00:21:12.640 So,

00:21:13.140 I like

00:21:13.620 the fact

00:21:13.960 that he

00:21:14.160 put it

00:21:14.380 out there

00:21:14.660 as a

00:21:15.080 sort of

00:21:16.840 a self-defense

00:21:17.720 thing.

00:21:19.120 Speaking

00:21:19.580 of climate

00:21:20.220 change,

00:21:20.620 Bjorn

00:21:20.940 Lomborg,

00:21:21.740 who you

00:21:22.060 know as

00:21:22.640 one of

00:21:23.860 the most

00:21:24.240 rational

00:21:25.040 evaluators

00:21:27.000 of climate

00:21:27.500 change and

00:21:28.040 other issues.

00:21:29.740 And he

00:21:30.420 was looking

00:21:30.720 at the

00:21:31.380 adequacy

00:21:32.020 of batteries

00:21:32.820 if we

00:21:34.100 had a

00:21:34.340 world that

00:21:34.740 was powered

00:21:35.160 by solar

00:21:35.720 and wind.

00:21:38.780 Now,

00:21:39.360 we know

00:21:39.540 that you

00:21:39.760 need battery

00:21:40.180 backup for

00:21:40.720 those because

00:21:41.200 they're not

00:21:41.720 continuous

00:21:42.400 sources.

00:21:43.740 Wind and

00:21:44.400 solar is

00:21:44.760 not.

00:21:45.440 So,

00:21:45.860 he gives

00:21:46.260 this estimate.

00:21:46.980 And I

00:21:47.160 would love

00:21:47.420 to know

00:21:47.780 if Elon

00:21:48.520 Musk agrees

00:21:49.520 with this

00:21:49.960 estimate.

00:21:50.360 he says

00:21:52.440 Europe uses

00:21:53.540 and he

00:21:54.000 gives

00:21:54.160 some

00:21:54.340 statistics

00:21:54.880 of how

00:21:55.300 much energy

00:21:55.720 they use.

00:21:57.640 So,

00:21:58.160 they have

00:21:58.360 enough

00:21:58.620 battery

00:21:59.000 storage

00:21:59.400 now

00:21:59.740 for

00:22:00.260 one

00:22:01.680 minute

00:22:01.980 and

00:22:02.180 21

00:22:02.600 seconds.

00:22:04.680 So,

00:22:05.320 all of

00:22:05.720 Europe's

00:22:06.180 battery

00:22:06.560 backup,

00:22:08.100 if they

00:22:08.980 use it

00:22:09.300 all,

00:22:09.520 would give

00:22:09.740 them another

00:22:10.180 little under

00:22:11.340 two minutes

00:22:11.900 of power.

00:22:13.800 All of

00:22:14.200 it.

00:22:14.360 by the

00:22:18.500 year

00:22:18.660 2030,

00:22:20.280 that

00:22:20.500 number

00:22:20.760 should

00:22:20.980 go way

00:22:21.380 up,

00:22:21.880 the

00:22:22.040 estimate

00:22:22.260 is,

00:22:22.860 up to

00:22:23.360 almost

00:22:24.000 12

00:22:24.360 minutes.

00:22:26.420 In

00:22:26.940 2030,

00:22:28.260 we might

00:22:28.660 be able

00:22:28.920 to get

00:22:29.160 the amount

00:22:29.500 of battery

00:22:29.860 backup to

00:22:30.440 almost 12

00:22:31.140 minutes of

00:22:31.740 the whole

00:22:31.980 day.

00:22:34.100 Now,

00:22:34.880 isn't this

00:22:35.500 the part

00:22:35.900 where Elon

00:22:36.800 Musk needs 1.00

00:22:37.320 to explain

00:22:37.840 to us

00:22:38.180 how we

00:22:38.480 can get

00:22:38.780 enough

00:22:39.020 battery

00:22:39.960 backup?

00:22:40.840 Because

00:22:41.140 he makes

00:22:41.720 a good

00:22:42.000 argument,

00:22:42.580 Musk 0.77

00:22:42.800 does,

00:22:43.120 that you

00:22:44.680 need just

00:22:45.100 a tiny

00:22:45.640 corner of

00:22:46.360 the United

00:22:46.900 States with

00:22:47.700 solar panels,

00:22:49.180 so tiny

00:22:50.440 that I

00:22:51.420 don't even

00:22:51.700 know if

00:22:51.980 you'd notice

00:22:52.460 it from

00:22:53.000 the space

00:22:55.500 station.

00:22:56.520 If you

00:22:56.880 were looking

00:22:57.220 down on

00:22:57.740 it,

00:22:57.960 I don't

00:22:58.220 know if

00:22:58.460 it would

00:22:58.640 be big

00:22:59.020 enough even

00:23:00.300 to see

00:23:00.680 it from

00:23:00.960 space,

00:23:01.820 but it

00:23:02.500 would power

00:23:02.900 the whole

00:23:03.220 United

00:23:03.500 States.

00:23:05.500 And

00:23:05.560 Musk gives 0.98

00:23:06.880 his description

00:23:07.740 of how big

00:23:08.280 that space

00:23:08.780 would be.

00:23:09.480 Now,

00:23:09.660 of course,

00:23:10.640 that's

00:23:10.960 conceptual,

00:23:12.260 because you

00:23:12.620 can't put

00:23:13.000 all your

00:23:13.280 power source

00:23:13.860 in one

00:23:14.220 place.

00:23:14.740 The grid

00:23:15.080 couldn't

00:23:15.380 handle it.

00:23:16.320 But suppose

00:23:16.960 you distributed

00:23:18.080 that around.

00:23:20.360 But I've

00:23:21.220 never seen

00:23:21.700 him address

00:23:22.540 how much

00:23:23.580 battery

00:23:24.080 backup

00:23:24.500 you need.

00:23:25.660 Has

00:23:25.800 anybody

00:23:25.980 seen

00:23:26.240 that?

00:23:27.040 Send me

00:23:27.480 a link

00:23:27.740 to it

00:23:28.000 if you

00:23:28.180 have any

00:23:28.540 recent

00:23:30.840 statements

00:23:32.260 where he

00:23:32.840 mentioned

00:23:33.500 whether you

00:23:33.940 could get

00:23:34.240 enough

00:23:34.500 battery

00:23:34.860 backup.

00:23:38.620 Wait a

00:23:39.400 minute.

00:23:39.780 Do you need

00:23:40.220 battery backup

00:23:40.920 backup if

00:23:41.240 your grid

00:23:41.940 was sufficient?

00:23:44.780 Let me

00:23:45.260 ask you

00:23:45.560 this.

00:23:46.580 If you

00:23:47.140 had your

00:23:47.640 solar powers

00:23:48.940 spread around

00:23:49.780 the country

00:23:50.280 and then

00:23:51.740 you connected

00:23:52.520 your grid

00:23:53.200 so that any

00:23:54.000 grid that

00:23:54.460 needs power

00:23:55.200 can get it

00:23:55.720 from anywhere

00:23:56.160 else in the

00:23:56.660 country,

00:23:57.020 that may be

00:23:57.540 impossible.

00:23:58.220 I don't know.

00:23:58.560 So that's

00:23:59.160 the part I

00:24:00.900 need you to

00:24:01.300 tell me if

00:24:01.700 it's possible.

00:24:03.080 Because the

00:24:03.660 longer you

00:24:04.120 send the

00:24:04.500 electricity,

00:24:05.160 the more it

00:24:05.700 gets degraded.

00:24:06.700 There's less

00:24:07.300 of it by the

00:24:07.760 time it gets

00:24:08.120 there.

00:24:08.260 So there's

00:24:09.440 some practical

00:24:10.020 limits about

00:24:10.680 sending electricity

00:24:12.040 long distances.

00:24:13.920 Right?

00:24:15.220 But could you

00:24:16.300 put enough

00:24:17.140 panels in

00:24:20.340 enough parts

00:24:20.920 of the

00:24:21.160 country that

00:24:22.700 no matter

00:24:23.140 which ones

00:24:23.680 were dark,

00:24:24.980 there would

00:24:25.320 still be

00:24:25.700 enough light

00:24:26.760 in the other

00:24:27.180 part of the

00:24:27.540 country or

00:24:28.560 wind?

00:24:30.700 Because most,

00:24:31.880 I guess you'd

00:24:32.420 have to go

00:24:32.800 global because

00:24:33.500 the country's

00:24:34.020 dark at the

00:24:34.520 same time.

00:24:35.520 So that

00:24:35.760 doesn't work.

00:24:36.280 But you

00:24:38.020 could take

00:24:38.360 care of

00:24:38.620 cloudy days.

00:24:40.260 At least

00:24:40.700 cloudy days you

00:24:41.500 could take

00:24:41.820 care of.

00:24:42.820 So I don't

00:24:43.480 know if the

00:24:43.880 grid can

00:24:44.320 solve any of

00:24:44.800 this or it

00:24:45.160 just needs to

00:24:45.620 be batteries.

00:24:46.300 I have a

00:24:46.660 suspicion it

00:24:47.220 has to be

00:24:47.500 batteries.

00:24:48.780 All right.

00:24:50.440 Bill Barr

00:24:51.120 was talking

00:24:51.660 about the

00:24:52.320 trans trend.

00:24:55.500 And I

00:24:56.000 didn't know

00:24:56.320 this, but

00:24:56.640 apparently the

00:24:57.500 percentage of

00:24:59.220 trans people

00:25:00.680 in the general

00:25:01.460 population seems

00:25:02.420 to be doubling

00:25:03.000 every generation,

00:25:03.840 as Bill

00:25:05.920 Maher pointed

00:25:06.380 out.

00:25:07.440 Now, it

00:25:08.200 probably doesn't

00:25:09.020 actually double,

00:25:10.120 does it?

00:25:11.120 Maybe we're just

00:25:11.880 learning of it.

00:25:12.740 Maybe there were

00:25:13.200 more people than

00:25:13.860 we ever imagined.

00:25:15.240 And doubling it

00:25:15.980 up to, you

00:25:16.400 know, 2% could

00:25:18.260 be just a

00:25:18.820 statistical

00:25:19.400 aberration.

00:25:20.960 But apparently

00:25:21.740 it's up to like

00:25:22.400 20% or something

00:25:23.480 in some places.

00:25:24.980 20% trans

00:25:26.180 children, like

00:25:27.320 in L.A.

00:25:27.800 you're saying

00:25:30.320 that if you go

00:25:30.960 to a dinner

00:25:31.420 party in L.A.,

00:25:32.920 you know, several

00:25:33.580 people will be

00:25:34.260 talking about

00:25:34.700 their trans

00:25:35.220 children.

00:25:36.700 Several?

00:25:37.860 You know, just

00:25:38.340 statistically it

00:25:39.100 can't possibly be

00:25:39.960 true.

00:25:41.760 And the

00:25:42.820 implication here

00:25:43.640 is that it's

00:25:44.120 more socially

00:25:44.940 driven than

00:25:45.620 biological.

00:25:48.060 What do you

00:25:48.720 think?

00:25:49.380 Do you think

00:25:49.940 that people

00:25:50.400 could be

00:25:50.940 socially driven

00:25:52.080 to question

00:25:53.640 their actual

00:25:54.280 gender identity

00:25:56.480 and then change

00:25:57.300 it?

00:25:57.800 Do you

00:25:59.560 think that

00:25:59.920 social pressure

00:26:01.480 is enough

00:26:02.180 to make

00:26:02.640 people change

00:26:03.300 their gender

00:26:04.620 identity?

00:26:07.580 Yes.

00:26:08.380 Yes, it is.

00:26:09.300 It's plenty.

00:26:10.960 Yeah.

00:26:11.380 The answer is

00:26:12.060 unambiguously,

00:26:13.120 totally yes.

00:26:14.720 It just

00:26:15.100 wouldn't affect

00:26:15.580 everybody.

00:26:16.980 Right?

00:26:17.580 Persuasion

00:26:18.120 is like that.

00:26:20.680 Persuasion

00:26:21.160 doesn't work

00:26:22.500 on everybody.

00:26:23.760 It doesn't

00:26:24.100 work all the

00:26:24.620 time.

00:26:25.800 It's a

00:26:26.440 statistical thing.

00:26:27.260 So yes,

00:26:28.200 if you have

00:26:28.720 a society

00:26:29.320 that's

00:26:29.840 promoting

00:26:30.980 anything

00:26:31.460 or at

00:26:32.820 least

00:26:33.100 removing

00:26:34.180 the

00:26:34.620 disincentive

00:26:35.440 to anything,

00:26:36.420 you get

00:26:36.760 more of it.

00:26:38.020 You get

00:26:38.320 more of it,

00:26:38.700 right?

00:26:39.180 So I think

00:26:39.960 society is

00:26:40.680 largely driving

00:26:41.900 it.

00:26:42.440 Now,

00:26:43.960 suppose it's

00:26:44.860 true.

00:26:46.380 I don't know

00:26:46.960 it's true,

00:26:47.820 but suppose it's

00:26:48.580 true that

00:26:49.800 society is

00:26:50.600 driving a

00:26:51.420 number of

00:26:51.740 people who

00:26:52.140 would not

00:26:52.560 have made

00:26:52.960 the decisions

00:26:53.820 they made

00:26:54.320 otherwise,

00:26:54.760 in a

00:26:55.800 different time

00:26:56.460 and with

00:26:56.800 a different

00:26:57.120 social situation.

00:26:58.540 It just

00:26:58.880 wouldn't have

00:26:59.260 happened.

00:27:00.800 Now,

00:27:01.340 is that

00:27:01.580 good or

00:27:01.880 bad?

00:27:03.420 Because here's

00:27:04.160 the thing.

00:27:05.460 If you're

00:27:06.360 promoting and

00:27:08.080 you're really,

00:27:09.220 let's say,

00:27:09.660 welcoming of

00:27:10.580 any trans

00:27:11.660 situation,

00:27:13.400 do you not

00:27:14.320 guarantee you'll

00:27:15.140 get too much

00:27:15.740 of it?

00:27:16.620 Too much of

00:27:17.240 it meaning

00:27:17.560 people who

00:27:18.100 really maybe

00:27:18.800 shouldn't have

00:27:19.240 made the

00:27:19.580 decision,

00:27:21.220 make the

00:27:22.080 decision.

00:27:24.160 But it

00:27:24.680 could go

00:27:24.940 the other

00:27:25.220 way,

00:27:25.440 right?

00:27:26.680 The other

00:27:27.220 way,

00:27:27.500 if it was

00:27:27.800 totally

00:27:28.180 suppressed and

00:27:29.980 discouraged,

00:27:31.520 there are

00:27:31.920 probably a

00:27:32.440 number of

00:27:32.800 people who

00:27:33.380 would have

00:27:33.760 been better

00:27:34.180 off with

00:27:34.580 the transition

00:27:35.140 and then

00:27:36.240 wouldn't do

00:27:36.700 it.

00:27:37.780 So who

00:27:38.320 do you

00:27:38.480 make the

00:27:38.840 losers?

00:27:40.700 Because you

00:27:41.620 have to

00:27:41.860 pick a

00:27:42.200 winner and

00:27:42.660 you have

00:27:42.860 to pick

00:27:43.100 a loser. 0.63

00:27:44.480 Do you

00:27:44.780 just go by

00:27:45.240 numbers and

00:27:46.460 say,

00:27:46.700 okay,

00:27:46.920 which one

00:27:47.360 has the

00:27:47.680 greatest

00:27:47.940 number of

00:27:48.660 unhappy

00:27:49.040 people?

00:27:50.600 I don't

00:27:50.860 know.

00:27:51.040 Or do

00:27:51.960 you say

00:27:52.380 do no

00:27:53.400 harm and

00:27:54.720 it's worse

00:27:55.140 to injure

00:27:57.140 somebody than

00:27:58.560 it is to

00:27:59.060 not help

00:27:59.680 somebody?

00:28:01.600 I don't

00:28:01.920 know.

00:28:02.080 Is that a

00:28:02.400 reasonable

00:28:02.720 standard?

00:28:03.860 Based on

00:28:04.480 what?

00:28:04.800 Why would

00:28:05.120 you say

00:28:05.380 that's

00:28:05.600 reasonable?

00:28:07.080 And so

00:28:09.200 I always

00:28:09.680 separate the

00:28:10.280 two questions.

00:28:12.700 Question

00:28:13.180 number one,

00:28:13.820 is it a

00:28:14.260 good idea

00:28:14.980 the way

00:28:16.300 we're

00:28:16.540 messaging

00:28:17.020 and handling

00:28:18.040 the trans

00:28:18.560 situation?

00:28:19.060 Is it a

00:28:20.880 good idea

00:28:21.380 to do

00:28:21.740 it that

00:28:22.020 way?

00:28:22.920 And then

00:28:23.200 secondly,

00:28:24.400 is trans

00:28:25.540 a real

00:28:25.960 thing with

00:28:26.480 real people

00:28:27.020 making real

00:28:27.660 decisions?

00:28:28.640 Or is it

00:28:29.020 all psychological

00:28:29.820 or whatever?

00:28:30.700 So I say

00:28:32.060 let people

00:28:32.620 make their

00:28:33.520 own decisions.

00:28:35.620 Knowing that

00:28:36.840 many of them

00:28:37.340 will destroy

00:28:38.000 their lives.

00:28:40.160 Like everything

00:28:41.040 else.

00:28:42.440 I let people

00:28:43.520 make their own

00:28:44.060 decisions on a

00:28:44.840 motorcycle.

00:28:45.340 how many

00:28:47.560 people will

00:28:48.280 dump their

00:28:49.440 motorcycle at

00:28:50.260 one point or

00:28:51.200 another while

00:28:51.880 they own it?

00:28:53.220 If you buy a

00:28:53.880 motorcycle,

00:28:54.560 are you going

00:28:55.560 to go down?

00:28:56.940 Does anybody

00:28:57.560 own a

00:28:57.860 motorcycle?

00:28:58.840 People who

00:28:59.380 own a

00:28:59.640 motorcycle,

00:29:00.160 answer this

00:29:00.520 question.

00:29:00.900 If you own

00:29:01.280 a motorcycle,

00:29:02.360 are you going

00:29:02.720 to lay it

00:29:03.060 down?

00:29:04.160 Are you going

00:29:04.820 to lay down

00:29:05.280 your motorcycle

00:29:05.800 if you own

00:29:06.260 one?

00:29:07.520 Yes.

00:29:09.400 Yes.

00:29:10.440 You buy a

00:29:11.220 motorcycle knowing

00:29:12.080 you're going to

00:29:12.600 lay it down,

00:29:13.540 meaning at

00:29:14.980 some point

00:29:15.380 you're going

00:29:15.620 to have a

00:29:15.860 situation with

00:29:16.580 it.

00:29:18.920 Nobody buys

00:29:19.720 a motorcycle

00:29:20.200 and says I'm

00:29:20.980 not going to

00:29:21.340 wreck this

00:29:21.720 thing.

00:29:22.720 If you do,

00:29:23.700 you're not

00:29:24.340 really being

00:29:24.820 rational about

00:29:25.500 it.

00:29:26.500 Buying a

00:29:27.100 motorcycle means

00:29:28.400 buying a

00:29:29.400 wreck.

00:29:30.420 You're going

00:29:30.940 to be in

00:29:31.260 one.

00:29:32.080 You're going

00:29:32.440 to lay it

00:29:32.800 down.

00:29:33.860 At some

00:29:34.360 point or

00:29:34.720 another,

00:29:35.540 you're going

00:29:35.960 to be laying

00:29:36.460 by the side

00:29:36.980 of the road

00:29:37.440 and your

00:29:37.780 motorcycle is

00:29:38.400 going to

00:29:38.520 be sideways.

00:29:40.080 Right?

00:29:41.260 Anybody who

00:29:41.880 owns a

00:29:42.120 motorcycle can

00:29:42.780 confirm this.

00:29:43.980 You buy a

00:29:44.580 motorcycle with

00:29:45.420 the knowledge

00:29:46.200 you bought

00:29:46.580 yourself an

00:29:47.040 accident, you

00:29:48.440 just hope you

00:29:48.980 don't die.

00:29:49.880 That's it.

00:29:51.040 Same with a 0.94

00:29:51.560 bicycle.

00:29:53.020 Who buys a

00:29:53.900 bicycle saying I

00:29:54.720 won't fall off

00:29:55.320 my bicycle?

00:29:56.220 Nobody.

00:29:57.320 Nobody.

00:29:58.280 You're falling

00:29:59.000 off your

00:29:59.360 bicycle.

00:30:00.540 That's going

00:30:00.940 to happen.

00:30:03.280 So I don't

00:30:05.420 like analogies

00:30:06.300 because they're

00:30:06.780 always too

00:30:07.380 imperfect.

00:30:08.380 But getting

00:30:08.960 you to the

00:30:09.640 way of thinking

00:30:10.340 only, just

00:30:12.120 let that

00:30:12.860 analogy go.

00:30:13.600 We don't

00:30:13.820 need to

00:30:14.120 defend it.

00:30:15.060 I'm just

00:30:15.480 saying that

00:30:16.000 lots of

00:30:16.660 people will

00:30:17.040 make personal

00:30:17.680 choices about

00:30:18.620 transitioning that

00:30:21.140 you and I

00:30:21.620 would not

00:30:22.000 make.

00:30:23.120 And sometimes

00:30:23.660 we would have

00:30:24.200 made the right

00:30:24.660 decision and

00:30:25.800 sometimes we

00:30:26.440 wouldn't because

00:30:27.560 we don't really

00:30:28.060 know.

00:30:28.940 Because unfortunately

00:30:29.680 it's one of those

00:30:30.260 things you don't

00:30:30.720 really know if

00:30:31.440 you're going to

00:30:31.680 be happier.

00:30:32.980 You just

00:30:33.500 got to guess.

00:30:34.800 So this is a

00:30:35.800 case where if I

00:30:36.740 were the emperor

00:30:38.000 and I were

00:30:39.480 in charge of

00:30:40.080 everybody's life

00:30:40.900 I'd probably

00:30:42.080 slow down this

00:30:42.920 transitioning stuff.

00:30:44.800 I'm sure I

00:30:45.540 would make it

00:30:45.980 illegal before

00:30:47.720 a certain age.

00:30:50.340 Am I going to

00:30:51.300 be cancelled by

00:30:52.000 social media?

00:30:52.920 Because we

00:30:53.460 treat everything

00:30:53.980 else like that,

00:30:54.700 right?

00:30:55.560 Anything that's a

00:30:56.440 big permanent

00:30:57.100 decision kind of

00:30:57.980 thing.

00:30:58.440 We say you have

00:30:59.260 to be a certain

00:30:59.740 age to do it.

00:31:01.180 Now medical

00:31:01.700 stuff,

00:31:02.960 medical stuff,

00:31:04.780 parents do get

00:31:05.680 to decide.

00:31:08.000 So it's not

00:31:08.700 really the kid

00:31:09.240 deciding in the

00:31:09.900 first place,

00:31:10.820 ultimately,

00:31:11.560 because they

00:31:11.860 can't make that

00:31:12.360 decision.

00:31:14.120 So I'm not sure

00:31:14.960 that a parent

00:31:15.540 should make a

00:31:16.060 decision for a

00:31:16.740 kid about

00:31:17.500 transitioning.

00:31:19.680 I can say

00:31:20.420 that it's always

00:31:21.440 a decision

00:31:22.000 whether you

00:31:22.380 decide to do

00:31:22.980 it or not

00:31:23.360 do it.

00:31:23.720 It's still a

00:31:24.080 decision.

00:31:24.920 But I think

00:31:25.520 the decision

00:31:26.040 to wait and

00:31:27.700 let the kid 0.80

00:31:28.440 make their own

00:31:29.100 decision,

00:31:29.780 let's say when

00:31:30.620 they turn 18,

00:31:32.340 that just makes

00:31:33.460 more sense to

00:31:35.780 me.

00:31:36.520 Now is that

00:31:37.260 anti-trans

00:31:39.960 to say that

00:31:40.600 the trans

00:31:41.060 people should

00:31:41.700 make adult

00:31:42.400 decisions instead

00:31:43.260 of child

00:31:43.700 decisions?

00:31:45.220 I don't know.

00:31:46.900 Is that

00:31:47.220 taking it too

00:31:48.780 far?

00:31:49.940 I don't know.

00:31:50.960 I try to be

00:31:51.700 the most

00:31:54.080 aggressive

00:31:54.580 defender of

00:31:55.840 anybody who's

00:31:56.540 in a situation

00:31:59.360 where they're a

00:32:00.240 minority,

00:32:00.720 basically.

00:32:01.760 I like to

00:32:02.480 aggressively defend

00:32:03.400 them all.

00:32:04.460 It's just a

00:32:04.900 better world

00:32:05.320 that way.

00:32:05.680 So I hope

00:32:09.760 the best for

00:32:11.320 the trans

00:32:11.720 community in

00:32:13.100 all cases.

00:32:16.160 If I had to

00:32:17.000 guess, I would

00:32:17.520 say that the

00:32:18.100 transitioning among

00:32:19.000 kids is 80%

00:32:19.980 social.

00:32:22.120 Am I wrong?

00:32:23.560 I don't know.

00:32:24.600 It might be.

00:32:25.700 It might be 80%

00:32:26.940 biological.

00:32:28.460 But it feels,

00:32:30.180 without the

00:32:30.840 benefit of any

00:32:31.540 science, based on

00:32:33.780 everything I know

00:32:34.500 about everything

00:32:35.200 and the trends

00:32:36.320 and I'd say

00:32:37.580 80% is a

00:32:39.880 social pressure

00:32:40.580 and maybe

00:32:42.420 20% is

00:32:43.320 biological.

00:32:44.600 But again,

00:32:45.620 that's not good

00:32:46.460 enough to ban

00:32:47.040 it or to say

00:32:48.620 that you can't

00:32:49.100 do it.

00:32:50.420 So, you

00:32:52.420 know, I do

00:32:53.060 generally want

00:32:54.000 parents to have

00:32:54.860 the final say on

00:32:55.720 medical stuff,

00:32:56.780 but I don't

00:32:58.140 even think they

00:32:58.860 should have a

00:32:59.280 say in this

00:32:59.740 case.

00:33:00.060 because they're

00:33:02.800 really making

00:33:03.240 a decision for

00:33:04.000 an adult who

00:33:04.860 hasn't arrived

00:33:05.640 yet, right?

00:33:06.760 The kid.

00:33:10.980 So, did you

00:33:11.900 see that I

00:33:12.940 talked about

00:33:13.400 this, that

00:33:13.900 Elon Musk

00:33:14.580 called out the

00:33:15.660 Clinton campaign

00:33:17.360 lead?

00:33:17.740 He tweeted

00:33:18.080 this.

00:33:19.040 He said,

00:33:19.500 I bet most

00:33:20.220 people still

00:33:20.840 don't know that

00:33:21.780 a Clinton

00:33:22.300 campaign lawyer

00:33:23.180 using campaign

00:33:24.200 funds created

00:33:25.580 an elaborate

00:33:26.220 hoax about

00:33:26.980 Trump and

00:33:27.480 Russia.

00:33:28.420 Makes you

00:33:29.120 wonder what

00:33:29.520 else is fake,

00:33:30.400 he says.

00:33:31.660 Now he's

00:33:32.180 called out

00:33:32.660 the bleach

00:33:34.160 drinking hoax

00:33:34.900 as fake.

00:33:35.820 He's called

00:33:36.380 out the

00:33:36.700 Russia collusion

00:33:37.320 thing as

00:33:37.740 fake, including

00:33:38.540 the knowledge

00:33:39.920 certain that a

00:33:40.840 Clinton campaign

00:33:41.460 lawyer was

00:33:42.100 behind it, or

00:33:43.220 the major

00:33:43.760 part of it.

00:33:45.680 Makes you

00:33:46.300 wonder what

00:33:46.640 else is fake.

00:33:48.960 He hasn't

00:33:49.740 gotten to

00:33:50.160 Charlottesville

00:33:50.680 yet, but I

00:33:52.340 feel he's

00:33:52.780 circling it.

00:33:54.540 That might be

00:33:55.280 too much of a

00:33:56.800 third rail even

00:33:57.520 for Musk.

00:33:59.120 That would

00:33:59.860 certainly be

00:34:00.320 pushing the

00:34:00.960 risk-taking

00:34:02.400 there.

00:34:03.300 But it's the

00:34:03.960 biggest remaining

00:34:05.020 hoax.

00:34:05.600 It's the

00:34:06.000 tentpole hoax,

00:34:06.920 yes.

00:34:07.380 It is the

00:34:07.920 tentpole hoax,

00:34:08.880 the one that

00:34:09.380 supports all

00:34:10.420 the rest.

00:34:12.440 We'll see.

00:34:16.720 And you all

00:34:17.600 saw the

00:34:18.420 Elon Musk

00:34:19.600 tweet about

00:34:20.440 his wiener.

00:34:22.340 I didn't

00:34:23.000 realize that he

00:34:23.480 was talking to

00:34:24.140 one of the

00:34:26.220 co-creators or

00:34:27.260 creators of

00:34:28.120 YouTube,

00:34:29.420 somebody named

00:34:29.900 Chad Hurley.

00:34:31.820 And

00:34:31.840 Tesla,

00:34:34.640 you know,

00:34:35.280 and Chad was

00:34:36.340 asking him to

00:34:37.200 hurry up and

00:34:37.800 close his

00:34:38.380 Twitter deal.

00:34:39.620 And Tesla

00:34:40.860 responded,

00:34:41.980 fine, if you

00:34:42.660 touch my

00:34:43.060 wiener, you 0.97

00:34:43.780 can have a

00:34:44.200 horse.

00:34:46.480 If you touch

00:34:47.400 my wiener, you 0.97

00:34:48.140 can have a

00:34:48.640 horse.

00:34:49.660 You can't

00:34:50.120 tweet better

00:34:50.560 than that.

00:34:51.040 All right, I

00:34:52.800 told you I

00:34:53.400 watched Dinesh

00:34:54.280 D'Souza's movie

00:34:55.220 2000 Mules,

00:34:56.420 to give you

00:34:57.080 an opinion,

00:34:58.040 and that

00:34:58.680 there were

00:34:59.120 some pushback

00:34:59.900 on it,

00:35:00.640 and the

00:35:01.260 pushback, I

00:35:01.940 thought, was

00:35:02.400 reasonable.

00:35:03.820 Reasonable

00:35:04.340 pushback, but

00:35:05.620 you have to

00:35:06.140 also wait for

00:35:06.800 his reasonable

00:35:07.700 pushback to

00:35:08.600 the pushback.

00:35:09.720 The first

00:35:10.580 criticism of

00:35:11.780 the movie was

00:35:12.420 that using

00:35:13.000 geo-tracking

00:35:13.780 to push

00:35:15.340 somebody in

00:35:15.840 the vicinity

00:35:16.720 of a drop

00:35:17.780 box for

00:35:18.320 ballots doesn't

00:35:19.780 mean they put

00:35:20.460 ballots in the

00:35:21.120 box.

00:35:22.200 Maybe it

00:35:22.700 means that's

00:35:23.260 where their

00:35:23.620 Starbucks is,

00:35:24.440 and they

00:35:25.420 go to that

00:35:26.220 location

00:35:26.680 repeatedly, and

00:35:27.740 it's just

00:35:28.180 next to a

00:35:28.740 box.

00:35:30.060 Right?

00:35:30.720 Reasonable.

00:35:32.440 But then

00:35:32.860 Dinesh says,

00:35:34.200 that's why we

00:35:35.420 eliminated everybody 0.99

00:35:37.260 who didn't go to

00:35:38.040 ten different

00:35:38.740 drop boxes.

00:35:40.980 Okay, if

00:35:41.600 one person was

00:35:42.960 in the vicinity

00:35:43.540 of ten

00:35:44.120 different drop

00:35:44.740 boxes,

00:35:46.020 that's a

00:35:48.060 pretty good

00:35:48.420 argument,

00:35:49.220 because there

00:35:50.020 aren't ten

00:35:50.500 Starbucks next

00:35:51.780 to ten drop

00:35:52.460 boxes, it's

00:35:53.500 statistically

00:35:54.040 impossible.

00:35:56.660 So I think

00:35:57.220 that Dinesh

00:35:57.960 makes a

00:35:58.600 completely

00:35:59.400 solid argument

00:36:00.200 that the

00:36:01.380 geo-tracking

00:36:02.060 for this

00:36:02.620 purpose is

00:36:03.300 good enough,

00:36:04.440 it's accurate

00:36:05.020 enough, because

00:36:06.300 they eliminated

00:36:07.580 all the data

00:36:08.240 from somebody

00:36:08.780 who didn't go

00:36:09.300 to ten

00:36:09.960 drop boxes.

00:36:11.860 If this

00:36:12.700 data were

00:36:13.360 people who

00:36:13.860 went to at

00:36:15.360 least one or

00:36:16.160 two drop

00:36:16.720 boxes, then

00:36:18.140 you could say

00:36:18.600 to yourself,

00:36:19.220 but that's just

00:36:19.720 the normal

00:36:20.220 flow of people.

00:36:21.680 There's always

00:36:22.100 going to be one

00:36:22.740 person walking

00:36:23.380 by a drop

00:36:24.000 box, but

00:36:25.280 he didn't do

00:36:25.680 that.

00:36:26.700 It was like,

00:36:27.300 when does one

00:36:27.980 person go to

00:36:29.300 ten different

00:36:29.960 drop boxes?

00:36:31.180 Because it's

00:36:32.060 not like they're

00:36:32.600 evenly distributed,

00:36:34.440 so the

00:36:34.840 statistical

00:36:36.020 likelihood of

00:36:37.000 one person

00:36:37.640 being within

00:36:38.800 a few feet

00:36:39.400 of ten

00:36:39.920 different drop

00:36:40.520 boxes on,

00:36:41.440 let's say,

00:36:41.680 a short

00:36:41.980 period of

00:36:42.440 time, pretty

00:36:43.880 close to

00:36:44.360 zero that

00:36:45.080 that's an

00:36:45.480 accident.

00:36:46.640 So I would

00:36:47.020 say that

00:36:47.380 Dinesh's

00:36:47.860 response to

00:36:48.480 that is the

00:36:49.980 winning argument.

00:36:51.440 it's stronger

00:36:52.860 than the

00:36:53.320 criticism.

00:36:55.160 Number two,

00:36:57.440 criticize for

00:36:58.420 not showing

00:36:59.060 videos of

00:37:00.860 the one

00:37:01.280 person doing

00:37:01.920 those multiple

00:37:02.520 drop boxes.

00:37:03.800 There are

00:37:04.080 videos of

00:37:04.640 one person

00:37:05.140 doing it

00:37:05.520 once, but

00:37:07.860 he hasn't

00:37:08.460 produced the

00:37:09.020 one person

00:37:09.540 doing it

00:37:09.960 multiple times,

00:37:10.920 which would

00:37:11.200 really be the

00:37:11.840 hammer on

00:37:13.540 the case.

00:37:14.920 He says

00:37:15.760 that they're

00:37:16.560 working on it,

00:37:17.160 and the

00:37:18.100 reason that

00:37:18.560 they didn't

00:37:19.140 is because

00:37:19.740 in many

00:37:21.720 cases the

00:37:22.280 video doesn't

00:37:22.820 exist, because

00:37:23.840 there's no

00:37:24.220 video surveillance

00:37:25.020 in that box,

00:37:26.160 and in many

00:37:26.940 cases it's so

00:37:27.760 poor that you

00:37:29.360 can't make

00:37:29.800 out if it's

00:37:30.280 the same

00:37:30.580 person.

00:37:31.880 But if

00:37:33.080 the video

00:37:33.640 has a

00:37:34.140 time signature,

00:37:35.860 as does

00:37:36.620 the geo

00:37:38.100 tracking,

00:37:39.560 presumably,

00:37:40.640 and I think

00:37:41.100 this is what

00:37:41.580 he said he

00:37:41.960 was doing,

00:37:42.380 but I'm not

00:37:42.760 100% sure,

00:37:43.860 I think he's

00:37:44.520 looking to

00:37:44.980 sync up the

00:37:46.440 exact time

00:37:47.260 of the

00:37:47.960 video with

00:37:48.560 the exact

00:37:48.900 time of

00:37:49.240 the geo

00:37:49.620 tracking to

00:37:51.040 make sure

00:37:51.420 that the

00:37:51.840 person putting

00:37:52.360 it in the

00:37:52.660 box is

00:37:53.700 probably the

00:37:55.560 person, the

00:37:56.780 same person.

00:37:58.200 Now if he

00:37:58.860 can come up

00:37:59.380 with that,

00:37:59.840 and even if

00:38:00.360 those videos

00:38:00.960 are grainy,

00:38:03.060 if it looks

00:38:03.820 like it could

00:38:04.440 be that

00:38:04.820 person and

00:38:05.620 the geo

00:38:06.600 tracking says

00:38:07.320 it is, I

00:38:08.460 would buy

00:38:08.800 that argument.

00:38:10.100 That would

00:38:10.520 be pretty

00:38:11.100 solid proof.

00:38:13.080 But you

00:38:14.060 haven't seen

00:38:14.500 it yet,

00:38:14.900 have you?

00:38:15.240 Unless you

00:38:16.720 see that,

00:38:18.220 the criticism

00:38:18.860 is stronger

00:38:19.620 than the

00:38:20.060 argument.

00:38:22.660 That's where

00:38:23.380 I'm at

00:38:23.700 today.

00:38:25.380 My current

00:38:26.320 view is

00:38:28.120 that until

00:38:28.600 you have at

00:38:29.280 least one

00:38:29.800 video showing

00:38:30.880 somebody doing

00:38:31.580 it to ten

00:38:32.080 boxes with

00:38:32.880 some confirmation,

00:38:34.360 without that,

00:38:36.220 the criticism

00:38:36.940 is still a

00:38:38.060 little bit

00:38:38.380 stronger than

00:38:39.060 the movie

00:38:39.440 is.

00:38:40.540 I would

00:38:40.860 put the

00:38:41.160 criticism as

00:38:41.960 stronger than

00:38:42.480 the claim

00:38:42.980 for now.

00:38:44.180 But remember,

00:38:46.060 Dinesh says

00:38:46.640 he can

00:38:46.920 produce this.

00:38:48.540 Now the

00:38:48.900 other criticism

00:38:49.540 is show

00:38:50.240 us the

00:38:50.560 data.

00:38:51.840 You've

00:38:52.240 told us

00:38:52.600 the result,

00:38:53.400 but we

00:38:54.040 need to

00:38:54.340 see the

00:38:54.640 data.

00:38:55.380 How's

00:38:55.700 that

00:38:55.880 criticism?

00:38:57.200 Very

00:38:57.500 good.

00:38:58.580 It's good.

00:38:59.740 So until

00:39:00.460 you have

00:39:00.960 access to

00:39:01.500 the data,

00:39:02.300 and other

00:39:02.680 people say,

00:39:03.340 oh, it

00:39:03.540 does say

00:39:03.860 this,

00:39:04.780 and until

00:39:05.280 you can

00:39:05.540 see one

00:39:05.980 video,

00:39:07.560 ideally you'd

00:39:08.280 want more

00:39:08.680 than one,

00:39:09.440 of somebody

00:39:10.180 who's clearly

00:39:10.860 doing this

00:39:12.200 activity,

00:39:13.560 I would

00:39:13.920 say the

00:39:14.540 criticisms are

00:39:16.900 slightly stronger

00:39:17.620 than the

00:39:17.980 movie right

00:39:18.980 now.

00:39:20.900 But wait,

00:39:22.580 hold your

00:39:24.240 opinion,

00:39:25.520 because Dinesh

00:39:26.860 says he can

00:39:27.420 produce exactly

00:39:28.360 what you're

00:39:28.760 asking for.

00:39:30.000 Now if he

00:39:30.600 produces that,

00:39:32.240 I would say

00:39:32.840 that the

00:39:33.540 movie is

00:39:34.000 stronger than

00:39:34.520 the criticism.

00:39:36.500 Is that

00:39:37.100 fair?

00:39:38.020 Is that a

00:39:38.740 fair analysis?

00:39:39.380 that if he

00:39:40.760 produces an

00:39:41.400 answer to

00:39:41.800 these

00:39:42.000 criticisms,

00:39:43.180 probably then 0.74

00:39:44.440 the movie is

00:39:44.940 going to be

00:39:45.200 stronger than

00:39:45.700 the criticisms.

00:39:47.240 I would

00:39:47.860 guess they

00:39:49.080 are at

00:39:49.660 that point.

00:39:51.540 All right?

00:39:53.080 Somebody says

00:39:53.720 not fair, but

00:39:54.320 most of you

00:39:54.700 said that's

00:39:55.060 fair.

00:39:55.700 So we'll

00:39:56.100 wait and

00:39:56.580 see.

00:39:57.160 We're going

00:39:57.800 to give

00:39:58.060 Dinesh his 1.00

00:39:58.760 full

00:39:59.260 opportunity to

00:40:04.560 make the

00:40:05.060 case.

00:40:06.920 All right.

00:40:09.380 Kyle Bass,

00:40:12.880 who's a

00:40:13.420 big China

00:40:14.080 critic,

00:40:15.080 as big as

00:40:17.060 I am,

00:40:18.460 so he's

00:40:19.040 very well

00:40:19.800 known for

00:40:20.280 criticizing

00:40:20.860 China,

00:40:22.120 says China

00:40:22.800 is preparing

00:40:23.360 for war.

00:40:25.400 Uh-oh.

00:40:27.080 Let me read

00:40:27.840 his tweet,

00:40:28.440 see if you

00:40:28.960 are convinced.

00:40:30.580 So Kyle

00:40:31.080 Bass says,

00:40:31.540 China is 0.85

00:40:31.880 preparing for

00:40:32.400 war.

00:40:33.000 First,

00:40:33.760 Xi orders

00:40:35.000 Chinese banks

00:40:35.680 to risk,

00:40:36.240 assess,

00:40:36.580 and insulate

00:40:37.560 against

00:40:38.040 potential

00:40:38.640 U.S.

00:40:39.440 sanctions.

00:40:41.160 Now Xi is

00:40:41.720 directing Chinese

00:40:42.440 nationals overseas

00:40:43.400 to divest of

00:40:44.480 any assets.

00:40:46.180 China has 0.91

00:40:46.700 been hoarding

00:40:47.280 grain for

00:40:47.900 over a

00:40:48.260 year.

00:40:50.520 The playbook

00:40:51.080 is,

00:40:51.880 Xi's playbook

00:40:52.800 is obvious to

00:40:53.420 anyone willing

00:40:53.900 to connect

00:40:54.380 the dots.

00:40:55.080 In January

00:40:55.540 2020,

00:40:56.840 China updated

00:40:57.540 their, quote,

00:40:58.100 foreign investment

00:40:58.920 law, which

00:41:00.140 gives Beijing

00:41:00.680 the power and

00:41:01.220 ability to

00:41:01.740 nationalize

00:41:02.540 foreign assets

00:41:03.400 and investments

00:41:04.680 under special

00:41:05.980 circumstances

00:41:06.680 which would

00:41:07.180 include war.

00:41:08.720 In mid-2021,

00:41:10.180 Kyle Bass

00:41:10.660 says,

00:41:11.440 China's new 0.99

00:41:11.920 counter-foreign

00:41:12.480 sanctions law

00:41:13.180 enables Beijing

00:41:14.860 to seize

00:41:15.500 corporate assets

00:41:16.320 and detain

00:41:17.480 expat employees

00:41:18.460 if the underlying

00:41:19.440 corporation simply

00:41:20.460 is complying

00:41:21.800 with foreign

00:41:22.420 sanctions.

00:41:24.480 That's a pretty

00:41:25.200 big deal.

00:41:26.160 If you're even

00:41:26.740 complying with

00:41:27.520 sanctions,

00:41:28.120 China can close 0.93

00:41:28.800 you down.

00:41:30.640 And then Kyle

00:41:31.320 Bass says,

00:41:31.860 the groundwork

00:41:32.360 is being laid

00:41:32.920 for a complete

00:41:33.440 seizure of

00:41:34.180 foreign assets

00:41:34.900 and investment

00:41:35.580 in China.

00:41:36.660 If you're an 0.51

00:41:37.440 institutional

00:41:38.000 fiduciary or

00:41:38.840 any other

00:41:39.240 fiduciary,

00:41:40.340 you better

00:41:40.720 rethink your

00:41:41.460 risk assessment

00:41:42.400 of investing

00:41:43.220 in public

00:41:43.880 or private

00:41:44.540 Chinese companies.

00:41:47.240 And then he

00:41:47.500 points out

00:41:47.860 investors lost

00:41:48.540 everything in

00:41:49.040 Russia and

00:41:49.420 have tried to

00:41:49.980 sweep it under

00:41:50.440 the rug.

00:41:51.360 They won't be

00:41:51.840 able to hide

00:41:52.320 the hundreds of

00:41:52.980 billions that

00:41:53.480 will be lost

00:41:54.080 in Chinese

00:41:54.780 investments.

00:41:56.260 Now, knowing

00:41:56.720 that Kyle

00:41:57.640 Bass is as

00:41:58.400 big a critic

00:41:59.200 of China as

00:42:00.020 I am,

00:42:01.320 do you

00:42:02.420 think this

00:42:04.300 is China

00:42:04.720 preparing for

00:42:05.480 war?

00:42:06.540 I think

00:42:07.260 yes, but

00:42:08.880 preparing for

00:42:09.660 war is

00:42:10.200 different than

00:42:10.660 planning for

00:42:11.340 war.

00:42:13.240 It looks like

00:42:14.160 they're doing

00:42:14.640 things which

00:42:15.380 just would

00:42:15.840 make sense

00:42:16.560 because they're

00:42:18.380 watching what's

00:42:18.940 happening in the

00:42:19.500 world and

00:42:19.900 they're saying,

00:42:20.300 uh-oh, this

00:42:21.600 could come at

00:42:23.280 us.

00:42:23.960 So I think what

00:42:24.640 they're doing is

00:42:25.140 just mutually

00:42:25.880 assured destruction

00:42:26.840 and protecting

00:42:28.360 their situation.

00:42:30.300 So it looks

00:42:30.720 like just

00:42:31.060 protection.

00:42:33.280 But it is

00:42:34.200 nonetheless true

00:42:35.280 that they're

00:42:35.680 preparing for

00:42:36.400 war because

00:42:38.060 war would be 0.99

00:42:38.740 the primary

00:42:39.360 reason that

00:42:40.060 any of this

00:42:40.540 would be

00:42:40.980 activated.

00:42:45.320 All right.

00:42:48.740 So keep an

00:42:49.620 eye on that.

00:42:51.760 The war on 0.57

00:42:52.600 Ukraine has 0.72

00:42:53.320 been reduced

00:42:53.900 to minor

00:42:55.740 headlines now.

00:42:56.840 And the

00:42:57.140 minor headline

00:42:57.780 was, Russia

00:42:58.620 claims total

00:42:59.440 control of

00:43:00.180 Mariupol.

00:43:01.460 Now, there's

00:43:02.380 not much left

00:43:03.080 of Mariupol,

00:43:03.780 is there?

00:43:05.180 So, I mean,

00:43:06.360 they own a

00:43:06.940 city that's

00:43:07.440 destroyed.

00:43:10.020 But here's the

00:43:10.820 other thing.

00:43:11.200 Can they hold

00:43:11.720 it?

00:43:13.460 Isn't it my

00:43:14.300 understanding that

00:43:15.080 Russia has a 0.61

00:43:16.600 good attacking

00:43:18.200 military, but

00:43:20.560 their holding

00:43:21.900 ground military

00:43:22.940 is sort of

00:43:23.440 lacking and

00:43:24.220 they're not

00:43:24.540 even staffed

00:43:25.220 for it?

00:43:25.560 So I

00:43:26.340 wonder if

00:43:26.880 conquering it

00:43:28.920 even means

00:43:29.500 anything.

00:43:30.680 Because I

00:43:31.640 know it's a

00:43:32.000 major port,

00:43:32.800 so it's

00:43:33.040 strategically

00:43:33.540 important, but

00:43:34.700 can they

00:43:34.980 hold it?

00:43:36.980 I feel like

00:43:38.020 they're going

00:43:39.400 to be sitting

00:43:40.300 ducks. 0.93

00:43:41.040 Because if the

00:43:41.640 Russians hold 1.00

00:43:42.220 it, the

00:43:42.900 targets would

00:43:43.420 be kind of

00:43:43.820 obvious.

00:43:45.340 And it

00:43:45.940 seems like the

00:43:46.540 Ukrainian

00:43:47.280 resistance or

00:43:49.360 whatever would

00:43:49.940 just be able to

00:43:50.600 hammer the

00:43:51.800 Russians while 0.99

00:43:53.700 they're trying to

00:43:54.180 hold Mariupol.

00:43:56.580 Imagine being

00:43:57.900 the Russian

00:43:58.480 occupying force

00:44:00.500 in Mariupol.

00:44:02.240 Every time you

00:44:02.960 went outdoors,

00:44:04.900 there would be

00:44:05.360 a drone there.

00:44:07.220 There would be a

00:44:08.100 drone on your

00:44:08.700 ass every time 0.76

00:44:09.780 you walked

00:44:10.180 outdoors.

00:44:11.460 If you tried to

00:44:12.280 get together,

00:44:12.900 the drones would

00:44:13.540 bomb the

00:44:14.180 building.

00:44:15.160 So if you

00:44:15.760 were trying to

00:44:16.780 hold Mariupol

00:44:18.680 and you're a

00:44:19.160 Russian military,

00:44:20.500 you're going

00:44:21.740 to have to

00:44:22.440 look in the

00:44:24.260 sky every

00:44:24.880 day, every

00:44:25.800 time you

00:44:26.140 walk outside.

00:44:26.980 Because there's

00:44:27.440 going to be a

00:44:27.820 drone up there

00:44:28.460 looking to

00:44:29.820 kill you. 0.99

00:44:33.380 All right, so

00:44:34.180 there's a

00:44:35.240 rumor that the

00:44:35.940 Roe versus

00:44:36.320 Wade decision is

00:44:37.100 coming as early

00:44:37.680 as Monday and

00:44:38.460 hell will break

00:44:39.380 loose and

00:44:39.980 Biden

00:44:40.780 administration is

00:44:41.640 preparing for

00:44:42.560 some kind of

00:44:44.920 violence from

00:44:47.040 their own team,

00:44:47.720 I guess, from

00:44:48.240 the left.

00:44:48.640 Now, how

00:44:53.600 many of you

00:44:54.100 think that the

00:44:54.780 final decision

00:44:55.600 will equal the

00:44:56.700 leaked version?

00:44:59.800 How many

00:45:00.520 think the real

00:45:01.260 decision will be

00:45:02.160 basically the

00:45:03.000 leaked version,

00:45:03.800 give or take

00:45:04.640 some minor edits?

00:45:06.840 Mostly yes.

00:45:08.880 Or close to it,

00:45:09.840 probably.

00:45:10.820 Probably.

00:45:12.240 Probably.

00:45:13.240 But I remind

00:45:14.440 you that one of

00:45:15.840 my worst

00:45:16.420 predictions was

00:45:17.680 that the

00:45:18.620 the original

00:45:19.440 leak was fake.

00:45:21.280 But I included

00:45:22.240 in fake, it

00:45:24.420 could be an

00:45:24.820 early draft that

00:45:25.680 doesn't represent

00:45:26.580 the final decision.

00:45:28.680 So I'm going to

00:45:29.540 stick with my

00:45:30.180 decision, or not

00:45:31.060 decision, but my

00:45:32.000 prediction, which

00:45:33.100 has already been

00:45:34.100 debunked.

00:45:36.280 This will be the

00:45:36.800 second time I've

00:45:37.500 done that.

00:45:38.580 The first time was

00:45:39.460 when Kamala Harris

00:45:40.380 got kicked down

00:45:41.440 in the primaries,

00:45:43.080 and I stayed with

00:45:43.880 my decision that

00:45:44.660 she would be

00:45:45.100 president.

00:45:45.420 which turned

00:45:49.440 out to be

00:45:49.840 weirdly sort

00:45:50.680 of right while

00:45:51.300 being wrong.

00:45:54.360 I think there's

00:45:56.060 a non-zero

00:45:56.840 chance that the

00:45:57.900 decision won't be

00:45:58.760 what you saw.

00:46:00.680 What do you

00:46:01.320 think?

00:46:02.240 Is there

00:46:02.700 non-zero?

00:46:04.660 I think it's

00:46:05.320 low.

00:46:07.000 If I were going

00:46:07.700 to put my money

00:46:08.360 on it, I would

00:46:08.940 bet that that

00:46:09.540 decision ends up

00:46:10.400 being just what

00:46:11.200 you saw.

00:46:12.260 You know, some

00:46:12.640 version of it

00:46:13.220 would be just

00:46:13.620 I think it's

00:46:14.460 low.

00:46:15.660 Five percent

00:46:16.340 maybe.

00:46:18.620 And remember,

00:46:20.260 part of why it

00:46:21.440 might have been

00:46:21.860 leaked is to

00:46:23.140 judge public

00:46:23.820 reaction.

00:46:26.440 And if you

00:46:26.900 think that the

00:46:27.480 Supreme Court

00:46:28.280 doesn't respond

00:46:29.300 to the public's

00:46:31.760 emotions, well

00:46:32.940 then you're

00:46:33.240 wrong.

00:46:34.520 You're wrong.

00:46:35.560 They do make

00:46:36.680 law based on

00:46:37.700 public emotions.

00:46:39.980 They just argue

00:46:41.320 it in legal

00:46:42.180 terms, but

00:46:42.780 basically, they

00:46:44.360 are very

00:46:44.760 sensitive to

00:46:45.460 the will of

00:46:46.940 the people,

00:46:47.660 just indirectly.

00:46:50.880 You're sick of

00:46:51.740 Scott being so

00:46:52.440 cocky about

00:46:53.020 Ukraine.

00:46:54.120 What part is

00:46:54.900 cocky?

00:46:58.940 What would

00:46:59.760 be my

00:47:00.180 cocky, I

00:47:01.160 just want to

00:47:01.540 see what, what

00:47:03.240 did I say

00:47:03.880 that's cocky

00:47:04.520 about Ukraine?

00:47:05.520 I literally

00:47:06.160 said that it

00:47:07.640 was one of my

00:47:08.200 worst predictions.

00:47:09.180 I say it over

00:47:09.780 and over again.

00:47:11.320 They're going

00:47:14.480 to keep it.

00:47:17.000 All right,

00:47:17.380 well, I

00:47:18.060 guess, that

00:47:18.900 sounds like

00:47:19.300 maybe there's

00:47:19.700 a problem

00:47:20.040 on your

00:47:20.360 side.

00:47:21.780 Because being

00:47:23.120 cocky and

00:47:24.020 confessing that

00:47:24.840 you're wrong

00:47:25.320 about it seems

00:47:26.100 somewhat opposite.

00:47:28.620 That's a weird

00:47:29.340 comment.

00:47:31.000 All right.

00:47:31.320 I'm less of a

00:47:38.240 true optimist

00:47:38.920 than I used

00:47:39.380 to be.

00:47:41.080 You get

00:47:41.640 beaten down

00:47:42.120 after a while.

00:47:43.480 Anyway, it

00:47:44.180 looks like

00:47:44.640 Ukraine will 0.90

00:47:45.560 remain a

00:47:46.140 country.

00:47:48.180 At this

00:47:48.780 point, how

00:47:49.700 many of you

00:47:50.180 would say

00:47:50.520 that's a

00:47:51.200 statement?

00:47:51.440 They're going

00:47:51.740 to lose

00:47:51.980 territory,

00:47:52.900 probably.

00:47:54.060 But how

00:47:54.380 many of you

00:47:55.100 believe that

00:47:55.860 Ukraine will 0.90

00:47:56.400 now remain a

00:47:57.480 sovereign country?

00:47:58.240 pretty much

00:47:59.800 all of you,

00:48:00.200 right?

00:48:01.240 And

00:48:01.640 you'll regret

00:48:09.860 openly calling

00:48:10.600 for the

00:48:11.020 killing of

00:48:11.520 Russia.

00:48:12.900 What?

00:48:14.180 You'll regret

00:48:15.060 openly calling

00:48:15.980 for the

00:48:16.360 killing of

00:48:16.820 Russia.

00:48:17.220 Did I do

00:48:17.580 that?

00:48:18.420 Did anybody

00:48:19.160 see me openly

00:48:20.060 calling for the

00:48:21.040 killing of

00:48:21.700 Russia? 0.61

00:48:23.120 When did

00:48:23.680 that happen?

00:48:25.140 Have you

00:48:25.460 ever noticed

00:48:25.860 that almost

00:48:26.280 all of my

00:48:26.760 critics are

00:48:27.560 criticizing

00:48:28.120 some

00:48:28.460 imaginary

00:48:28.920 thing?

00:48:30.060 It's just

00:48:30.420 the weirdest

00:48:30.800 thing.

00:48:31.120 I almost

00:48:32.280 never,

00:48:33.880 rarely if

00:48:35.200 ever,

00:48:35.440 I can't

00:48:35.740 even remember

00:48:36.160 the last

00:48:36.480 time I was

00:48:36.880 criticized for

00:48:37.560 something I

00:48:38.040 actually did.

00:48:39.400 Because when

00:48:39.840 I'm criticized

00:48:40.320 for things I

00:48:41.020 actually do,

00:48:42.560 such as my

00:48:43.260 incorrect prediction

00:48:44.260 about the

00:48:44.680 invasion,

00:48:46.200 I embrace it

00:48:47.240 completely.

00:48:48.080 Yeah, that was

00:48:48.460 totally wrong.

00:48:52.640 All right.

00:48:53.440 Yeah, Putin

00:48:54.000 versus Russia. 0.66

00:48:55.500 It's a different

00:48:56.040 calculation.

00:48:58.120 Anyway, we'll

00:49:01.340 see if we're

00:49:01.700 over the first

00:49:02.420 way.

00:49:02.660 It looks like

00:49:03.080 what we

00:49:03.380 thought it

00:49:03.640 would be.

00:49:08.440 What else

00:49:09.120 is going on

00:49:09.720 here?

00:49:12.540 So,

00:49:14.120 listening to,

00:49:15.240 I guess,

00:49:16.180 the ongoing

00:49:17.520 investigation into

00:49:19.860 what happened

00:49:20.420 with 2020 and

00:49:21.520 the Russia

00:49:22.420 collusion thing.

00:49:23.140 So this is

00:49:24.060 Jonathan

00:49:24.460 Turley's take

00:49:25.340 talking about

00:49:26.960 the Alpha

00:49:27.420 Bank story.

00:49:28.200 So it was a

00:49:28.580 fake story that

00:49:30.060 was trying to

00:49:30.620 be pushed by

00:49:31.380 the Clinton

00:49:32.040 campaign lawyer,

00:49:33.860 I guess.

00:49:34.900 And Turley

00:49:35.400 says,

00:49:35.880 this Alpha

00:49:36.320 Bank story

00:49:36.840 was pushed

00:49:37.320 by Jake

00:49:37.900 Sullivan,

00:49:38.720 now the

00:49:39.280 national security

00:49:40.280 advisor,

00:49:41.240 and by

00:49:41.700 Clinton

00:49:42.060 herself.

00:49:43.100 But the

00:49:43.640 thing to keep

00:49:44.140 in mind is

00:49:44.680 that President

00:49:45.100 Obama was

00:49:45.780 briefed when

00:49:46.460 he was

00:49:46.720 president.

00:49:47.140 That Hillary 1.00

00:49:48.360 Clinton was

00:49:48.980 planning to

00:49:49.500 make a Russia 0.92

00:49:50.040 collusion claim

00:49:50.900 against Donald

00:49:51.600 Trump to

00:49:53.040 try to sort

00:49:53.800 of get out

00:49:55.040 of her own

00:49:55.500 email issues

00:49:56.220 during the

00:49:56.680 campaign.

00:49:57.700 And we now

00:49:58.300 have someone

00:49:58.740 saying,

00:49:59.880 quote,

00:50:00.340 yeah,

00:50:00.580 she green-lighted

00:50:01.560 the Alpha

00:50:01.900 Bank claim,

00:50:03.360 which were

00:50:03.800 completely

00:50:04.260 without

00:50:04.620 foundation.

00:50:06.400 So,

00:50:07.260 Obama knew

00:50:09.300 about this?

00:50:11.360 Now,

00:50:11.760 we assumed

00:50:12.940 or we

00:50:13.300 suspected

00:50:13.800 he did,

00:50:14.260 right?

00:50:14.580 But now we

00:50:15.140 have confirmation,

00:50:16.140 don't we?

00:50:17.160 We have

00:50:17.500 confirmation,

00:50:18.080 at least

00:50:18.480 according to

00:50:18.940 Jonathan

00:50:19.360 Turley's

00:50:19.820 interpretation.

00:50:20.900 confirmation

00:50:21.460 that Obama

00:50:23.280 was briefed

00:50:24.520 that there

00:50:24.880 would be

00:50:25.280 like an

00:50:25.820 illegal,

00:50:27.360 well,

00:50:27.660 not illegal,

00:50:28.340 I guess,

00:50:28.680 but an

00:50:29.480 illegitimate

00:50:30.140 claim.

00:50:31.860 And he

00:50:32.540 apparently was

00:50:33.200 okay with it

00:50:34.460 because he

00:50:35.420 let it

00:50:35.700 happen.

00:50:38.480 I would

00:50:39.140 say that

00:50:39.500 puts Obama

00:50:41.220 in the

00:50:42.060 most disgraced

00:50:43.460 president list.

00:50:45.420 I think

00:50:45.780 you'd have to

00:50:46.180 throw Obama

00:50:46.760 in there with

00:50:47.260 Nixon at

00:50:48.080 this point,

00:50:49.180 wouldn't you?

00:50:49.600 what would

00:50:51.020 really be

00:50:51.380 the difference

00:50:51.820 between what

00:50:52.420 Nixon did

00:50:53.040 and what

00:50:53.480 Obama did

00:50:54.260 if this

00:50:54.760 is true?

00:50:55.680 If he

00:50:56.180 was okay

00:50:57.620 with Hillary

00:50:58.740 Clinton

00:50:59.520 trying to

00:51:01.160 effect an

00:51:02.160 election with

00:51:02.760 a fake

00:51:03.420 story about

00:51:04.140 Russian

00:51:04.420 collusion,

00:51:05.900 if this

00:51:06.680 is true,

00:51:08.380 then he's

00:51:09.000 just Richard

00:51:09.620 Nixon and

00:51:10.440 fuck him

00:51:10.840 forever.

00:51:12.560 Am I

00:51:13.300 right?

00:51:13.500 Now,

00:51:15.120 keep in

00:51:15.440 mind,

00:51:15.880 I want to

00:51:16.240 be clear,

00:51:17.240 I supported

00:51:18.200 Obama for

00:51:19.660 president.

00:51:20.860 I thought it

00:51:21.540 was a good

00:51:21.900 move.

00:51:23.200 And actually,

00:51:23.940 there's some

00:51:24.320 things he did

00:51:24.840 that I thought

00:51:25.240 were pretty

00:51:25.780 solid.

00:51:27.060 But if

00:51:27.760 this is

00:51:28.160 true,

00:51:29.340 if this

00:51:29.820 is true,

00:51:31.400 fuck him

00:51:31.880 forever.

00:51:33.260 You don't

00:51:33.660 get over

00:51:34.940 this.

00:51:35.980 Now,

00:51:36.280 the other

00:51:36.540 thing that he

00:51:36.940 did that I

00:51:37.880 suggested he

00:51:38.700 should be

00:51:39.000 impeached

00:51:39.400 for was,

00:51:42.040 remember when

00:51:42.620 he said he

00:51:43.460 wouldn't

00:51:43.780 touch

00:51:44.200 marijuana

00:51:45.680 dispensaries,

00:51:47.140 and then he

00:51:47.940 got elected

00:51:48.460 and then he

00:51:49.000 went after

00:51:49.380 marijuana

00:51:49.860 dispensaries

00:51:50.540 in my

00:51:50.920 state,

00:51:51.860 to which I

00:51:52.620 said,

00:51:53.380 okay,

00:51:53.640 well,

00:51:53.840 what's your

00:51:54.180 reason?

00:51:55.320 Why did you

00:51:55.880 change your

00:51:56.340 mind?

00:51:57.400 And he

00:51:57.660 never gave

00:51:58.100 a reason.

00:51:59.560 Never.

00:52:00.440 To this

00:52:00.840 day,

00:52:01.180 he's never

00:52:01.580 given a

00:52:02.000 reason.

00:52:03.620 What's it

00:52:04.180 mean when

00:52:04.500 you don't

00:52:04.820 give a

00:52:05.120 reason?

00:52:07.100 It means

00:52:07.720 you're

00:52:07.900 corrupt.

00:52:09.000 It means

00:52:09.560 you can't

00:52:09.980 give a

00:52:10.280 reason.

00:52:10.860 It means

00:52:11.160 somebody

00:52:11.480 bought

00:52:11.760 you.

00:52:13.360 So I

00:52:14.200 said that

00:52:14.860 Obama should

00:52:15.460 have been

00:52:15.720 impeached for

00:52:16.600 not giving

00:52:17.100 a reason.

00:52:18.860 It's one

00:52:19.300 thing to

00:52:19.720 say I'm

00:52:20.200 going to

00:52:20.360 put you

00:52:20.680 people from

00:52:21.260 your state

00:52:21.720 in jail and

00:52:22.960 here are my

00:52:23.520 reasons.

00:52:24.420 And I'd say,

00:52:24.820 oh, I like

00:52:25.380 that or I

00:52:25.740 don't like it,

00:52:26.260 but at least

00:52:26.560 he showed

00:52:26.940 your work,

00:52:28.000 and then I

00:52:28.420 could at

00:52:28.660 least trust

00:52:29.100 the system.

00:52:30.720 But you

00:52:32.060 can't trust

00:52:32.580 the system

00:52:33.140 if he did

00:52:35.300 this.

00:52:36.980 All right?

00:52:37.520 I mean,

00:52:37.780 you can't

00:52:38.100 trust Obama

00:52:39.080 at all.

00:52:40.220 So I would

00:52:40.620 say this is

00:52:41.100 the most

00:52:41.540 disgraceful

00:52:42.580 thing I

00:52:43.220 have ever

00:52:45.060 seen a

00:52:45.540 president do.

00:52:47.040 Trying to

00:52:47.720 think of

00:52:48.040 something worse

00:52:48.640 than this.

00:52:49.800 If Obama

00:52:50.560 knew about

00:52:51.520 this and

00:52:51.940 was okay

00:52:52.520 with it,

00:52:53.760 and to

00:52:54.200 this day

00:52:54.680 he's not

00:52:55.160 outing them

00:52:55.660 for doing

00:52:56.060 it,

00:52:56.640 if that

00:52:57.080 really happened,

00:52:59.060 he's our

00:52:59.480 worst president.

00:53:01.340 There would

00:53:01.940 be nothing

00:53:02.400 that Trump

00:53:03.480 did that

00:53:04.060 would be on

00:53:04.420 this level.

00:53:05.840 Let me put it

00:53:06.920 in the cleanest

00:53:07.940 terms.

00:53:08.200 If you

00:53:09.000 accept that

00:53:09.520 this is

00:53:09.860 true,

00:53:10.180 and the

00:53:10.340 evidence is

00:53:10.820 pretty good

00:53:11.600 at this

00:53:11.880 point,

00:53:12.420 that Obama

00:53:13.360 was okay

00:53:13.980 with the

00:53:14.420 Russia

00:53:14.660 collusion

00:53:15.260 hoax being

00:53:16.700 perpetrated,

00:53:18.020 there's nothing

00:53:19.860 that Trump

00:53:20.280 ever did

00:53:20.840 that was

00:53:21.860 that bad.

00:53:24.220 What do

00:53:24.740 you say?

00:53:25.920 Name one

00:53:26.440 thing that

00:53:26.780 Trump did

00:53:27.200 that was

00:53:27.540 this bad.

00:53:28.700 Because if

00:53:29.260 you do,

00:53:29.940 the only

00:53:30.420 people who

00:53:30.820 could do

00:53:31.180 it would

00:53:31.520 be Democrats

00:53:32.840 who thought

00:53:34.000 that something

00:53:34.500 that was a

00:53:35.020 hoax was

00:53:35.480 real.

00:53:36.620 They're

00:53:36.860 going to

00:53:36.940 say,

00:53:37.240 well,

00:53:37.540 certainly

00:53:38.700 the

00:53:39.120 Charlottesville

00:53:39.800 fine people

00:53:40.440 statement

00:53:40.780 was worse,

00:53:41.860 but it

00:53:42.220 didn't

00:53:42.400 happen.

00:53:43.380 That was

00:53:43.720 a hoax.

00:53:44.960 Or,

00:53:45.300 well,

00:53:45.500 he told

00:53:45.940 us to

00:53:46.300 drink

00:53:46.540 bleach.

00:53:47.080 No,

00:53:47.540 that didn't

00:53:47.880 happen.

00:53:48.560 Didn't

00:53:48.800 happen.

00:53:49.140 That was

00:53:49.340 a hoax.

00:53:50.420 Well,

00:53:50.900 he called

00:53:51.680 the country

00:53:52.240 a shithole

00:53:52.740 country.

00:53:53.280 No,

00:53:54.040 that was

00:53:54.380 taken out

00:53:54.780 of context.

00:53:56.420 So there's

00:53:56.900 literally

00:53:57.220 nothing that

00:53:58.460 Trump has

00:53:58.920 ever been

00:53:59.340 confirmed to

00:54:00.360 have done,

00:54:01.600 like this

00:54:02.180 level of

00:54:02.620 confirmation,

00:54:03.980 that would

00:54:04.380 rise to

00:54:04.940 this level.

00:54:05.480 I can't

00:54:07.900 think of

00:54:08.140 anything.

00:54:14.680 You think

00:54:15.380 Carter was,

00:54:16.100 Obama was

00:54:16.740 the worst?

00:54:18.960 Yeah.

00:54:20.740 Woodrow

00:54:21.160 Wilson

00:54:21.520 jailing

00:54:22.160 critics.

00:54:22.660 Okay,

00:54:22.900 that would

00:54:23.160 be pretty

00:54:23.500 bad.

00:54:25.040 But I

00:54:25.680 think that

00:54:26.100 the Russia

00:54:27.320 collusion

00:54:27.780 thing could 0.56

00:54:28.400 have jailed

00:54:29.000 critics if

00:54:29.840 it worked

00:54:30.140 out.

00:54:31.120 So I'd

00:54:31.660 say that's

00:54:31.960 worse.

00:54:33.320 So Hillary 1.00

00:54:34.020 Clinton,

00:54:34.780 worst person

00:54:35.300 in the

00:54:35.540 world,

00:54:36.120 Obama,

00:54:36.680 number

00:54:36.940 two.

00:54:38.180 That's

00:54:38.520 my final

00:54:38.960 vote.

00:54:41.760 George

00:54:42.280 Washington

00:54:42.660 was the

00:54:43.100 worst.

00:54:43.860 He had

00:54:44.100 slaves.

00:54:45.840 I guess

00:54:46.520 if you're a

00:54:46.880 slave owner,

00:54:47.460 technically,

00:54:48.140 you're worse. 0.53

00:54:49.860 I will

00:54:50.440 accept that

00:54:51.100 reframe.

00:54:51.620 All right,

00:55:01.180 just looking at

00:55:01.660 your comments

00:55:02.080 for a

00:55:02.400 moment.

00:55:07.240 All right,

00:55:07.880 I think we've

00:55:08.480 done it.

00:55:09.240 I believe I

00:55:09.960 have achieved

00:55:10.380 my objective

00:55:10.960 of the best

00:55:11.820 live stream in

00:55:12.800 the history of

00:55:13.280 civilization.

00:55:14.500 And before you

00:55:15.020 argue with me,

00:55:15.660 I think I'll

00:55:16.180 shut down the

00:55:16.880 live stream over

00:55:17.480 here on YouTube.

00:55:18.800 You know it's

00:55:19.200 true.

00:55:19.580 It's true.

00:55:21.180 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 21, 2022

Episode 1750 Scott Adams： Biden's War On Babies, Musk Mandates And Hillary Gets Away With Everything

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript