Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 28, 2022


Episode 1757 Scott Adams: Fix Every Problem In America With Better Home Design. And Mutant Hamsters


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour

Words per minute

140.12497

Word count

8,477

Sentence count

550

Harmful content

Misogyny

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

11

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we talk about the best predictor of success is the ability to put off immediate pleasure in order to get a bigger one in the future. Or is there a better way to measure success?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey, good morning everybody, and welcome to another amazing episode of Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:11.940 Now, you could also have your own favorite beverage, it doesn't have to be coffee, but
00:00:16.900 this is going to be a simultaneous something.
00:00:21.560 And when I say simultaneous, you know what I mean.
00:00:24.520 I mean it at the same time.
00:00:27.400 Or asynchronously, that works too.
00:00:30.000 We're very permissive here.
00:00:32.140 This is the place that you can be yourself, unless you're a bad person, and then go somewhere
00:00:38.800 else and be yourself.
00:00:40.360 But if you're a good person, and you'd like to be better, what you really need is a simultaneous
00:00:44.520 sip, and all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, say, tank or chalice, a canteen
00:00:49.760 jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, filled with your favorite liquid.
00:00:54.240 I like coffee.
00:00:56.080 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine to the day, the thing that's
00:01:03.760 going to release all of your feel-good chemistry.
00:01:07.040 This is going to feel really good.
00:01:08.700 Perfect.
00:01:09.700 You should time whatever it is that you'd like to have simultaneously with this sip.
00:01:14.980 Go.
00:01:15.980 Now, keep your mug with you, because this is more of a sipping kind of a day than it is
00:01:27.640 a news day.
00:01:29.500 Okay, let's talk about the tragedy, blah, blah, blah, tragedy.
00:01:37.240 Was that good enough?
00:01:39.180 Is everybody happy that I've covered the tragedy?
00:01:43.440 I really don't want to talk about it anymore, do you?
00:01:48.160 Not really.
00:01:49.780 Like, I had some notes here, and then I thought, you know, you know what you really need?
00:01:55.740 There's none of that.
00:01:56.680 How about let's just talk about good things?
00:02:00.940 So today's going to be a little bit different, because the news is nothing but that bad thing
00:02:08.680 that we're not going to talk about.
00:02:10.100 But there's some interesting things happening, too.
00:02:13.880 And one of the interesting things was, I just saw in the locals' chat, that somebody was
00:02:23.440 saying that the best predictor of success was the ability to put off rewards.
00:02:30.760 How many of you believe that's the best predictor of success?
00:02:34.440 The ability to forego immediate pleasure for later pleasure.
00:02:40.260 A lot of people say yes.
00:02:43.680 A lot of people say no.
00:02:45.480 Well, first of all, we don't know if studies ever are real.
00:02:50.020 I'm not sure any study's real anymore.
00:02:52.440 I've gotten to the point where if I see that a study says something's true, I just sort of
00:02:57.220 automatically think it might be the opposite of that, just as my starting point.
00:03:01.460 You know, I could be convinced, but as my starting point, as soon as I hear a study make some
00:03:07.620 wild claim, I just assume it's not true.
00:03:11.820 All right, now here's an alternative to that theory.
00:03:15.620 So one theory is it's the ability to put off pleasure to get a larger pleasure in the future.
00:03:23.740 Here's my reframe of that same concept.
00:03:26.520 What if the ability to put off pleasure now is really nothing but the ability to imagine
00:03:40.960 better?
00:03:42.800 Think about it.
00:03:45.820 I believe that I'm very good at putting off immediate pleasure, better than most.
00:03:51.960 If there were some kind of a contest where you said, all right, who's going to put off
00:03:57.380 pleasure the longest in order to get some big reward later, I would say, you don't want
00:04:02.700 to be in that contest with me because I can put off pleasure like a motherfucker.
00:04:10.160 I mean, I can really put off pleasure.
00:04:12.620 I can just shut down my pleasure as long as you need.
00:04:16.240 And if, here's the big if, if I can imagine a bigger pleasure that I'm competing for, right?
00:04:26.800 If I can't imagine a bigger pleasure later, then I'll take the pleasure today because it's
00:04:33.200 not being compared to anything.
00:04:35.380 The one today is the only one, so I'll take it.
00:04:38.540 Why wouldn't I?
00:04:39.400 But do you think it's a coincidence that I have, and I'm going to say that this is a
00:04:47.780 factual statement, and I'm hoping that you'll agree with this because it's important to the
00:04:52.660 concept.
00:04:55.020 Would you say it's a factual statement that I have a commercial-grade imagination, meaning
00:05:02.380 that my powers of imagination essentially are, you know, behind everything I create, and
00:05:09.040 that it is proven to have a commercial value in a few different domains.
00:05:14.480 So if you'll give me that, I'm going to see if I can generalize from it.
00:05:19.560 Now, this is just a hypothesis, right?
00:05:21.580 My hypothesis is that the ability to put off pleasure today is really just a difference in
00:05:31.140 imagination.
00:05:33.540 If you can really, really imagine what tomorrow looks like, you can bring tomorrow to today,
00:05:40.080 and you've got two things to compare today.
00:05:43.380 It's like a discounted cash flow, if anybody's an NBA nerd out there.
00:05:52.280 The way that you do a financial analysis, if you were, let's say, to compare an expense today
00:05:58.300 to some expense that might be done over time, you do this calculation on the expenses that
00:06:05.500 are done over time to bring them forward, or bring them, I guess, into the present, so
00:06:11.580 that you have two things that are both in the present.
00:06:13.820 So one is artificially massaged to bring those streams of money into the present by adjusting
00:06:20.120 for what it would mean in the present if you were to wait for it, basically.
00:06:23.500 And same thing.
00:06:27.120 So I think that putting off pleasure is completely related to how much you can imagine the competing
00:06:34.540 pleasure in the future.
00:06:36.820 Have I convinced you?
00:06:38.800 What do you think?
00:06:40.600 And now, if that's true, if my hypothesis is true, it means that you could cause people
00:06:47.100 to make different decisions by teaching them to imagine more vividly what the alternatives
00:06:54.800 are.
00:06:56.120 Now, there was an experiment that's always really influenced me, in which, now, of course,
00:07:03.740 who knows if this could be reproduced, but I'll bet it could be.
00:07:07.940 It agrees with my preconceived notions, so therefore I think it's good.
00:07:12.020 And that is that if you allow people to see themselves artificially aged, so you take somebody's
00:07:19.000 photo and you digitally age them so they can see themselves as a senior citizen, that they
00:07:26.000 will save more money today if they can see themselves like an actual photo of themselves
00:07:31.780 that looks like themselves in the future.
00:07:34.100 Because they'll protect that person.
00:07:37.480 It's them.
00:07:38.220 So, you've basically, you digital age something to bring it into the present so that you've
00:07:45.660 got two things in the present to compare.
00:07:47.640 Shall I save this money or spend it?
00:07:49.360 Ooh, I don't want to hurt this guy.
00:07:51.540 I'm looking at him right now.
00:07:53.700 So, I'll bet you, I'll bet you, the more time you spend imagining a good outcome that comes
00:08:02.060 from exercising or dieting or working hard to learn a new skill so you can improve your
00:08:09.700 career, whatever it is, I'll bet you, the more time you spend imagining the goodness of
00:08:15.880 the outcome, the more likely you're going to get there.
00:08:21.080 Just a thought.
00:08:23.240 All right.
00:08:23.580 There's a story about aggressive mutant hamsters in the news.
00:08:32.120 A team of scientists at Northwestern University, they've accidentally created overly aggressive
00:08:39.000 mutant hamsters.
00:08:40.860 So, they were doing a gene editing experiment.
00:08:43.580 They were trying to make the hamsters increase their bonding and be more lovable.
00:08:49.040 They wanted more lovable hamsters.
00:08:52.900 But they somehow accidentally created, quote, overly aggressive mutant hamsters.
00:08:59.880 Now, the first thing I thought, probably the first thing you thought, too, was, how do I
00:09:07.200 get one?
00:09:08.540 Am I right?
00:09:11.080 Because if there's anything I've ever wanted, it is an overly aggressive mutant hamster.
00:09:19.040 I've had a cat.
00:09:20.640 I have a dog.
00:09:22.380 Excellent pets.
00:09:24.400 Cats, love them.
00:09:26.020 Dogs, big dog lover.
00:09:27.800 I love dogs.
00:09:29.800 But if I could have an overly aggressive mutant hamster, I don't know if I'd even need friends.
00:09:37.000 I mean, I would just stay home and play with the hamster, if the hamster would have me.
00:09:41.460 I mean, I don't know what kind of powers the mutant hamster has.
00:09:46.360 They say mutant, but they're sort of quiet on what kind of superpowers the mutant hamster
00:09:51.080 actually has.
00:09:52.140 They say overly aggressive, but that seems true of most evil mutant hamsters.
00:09:59.500 So, I'm more specific.
00:10:01.440 Can they shoot any kind of lasers or maybe control the weather?
00:10:07.160 I don't know.
00:10:07.680 Richard Gere is reportedly trying to buy one.
00:10:13.140 I don't know what that's all about.
00:10:15.520 And, well, I don't know.
00:10:19.080 I think it would increase my bonding just to have one.
00:10:22.980 So, there's another story in the news, sort of.
00:10:27.160 All right, here's the nerdiest news story that, unfortunately, is the most interesting thing
00:10:34.220 in the world for me.
00:10:36.880 So, I'm going to try to convince you this is the most interesting thing in the world for you.
00:10:42.480 You just don't know it yet.
00:10:43.960 So, if you were to make a list of all our social problems, it would be a pretty long list, right?
00:10:52.740 You'd have everything from, you know, drugs to inflation to crime to bad schools to, you know, blah, blah, blah.
00:11:02.020 Well, but I contend that the following is true, that you could solve almost all of society's major problems
00:11:11.840 with better home design.
00:11:16.380 Does that seem like a big claim?
00:11:19.080 That you could solve almost all of society's major problems by better home design.
00:11:26.020 Not more expensive ones.
00:11:28.640 Much less expensive ones.
00:11:30.620 That would help you with your budget stuff.
00:11:33.280 But also ones that are designed for how people live.
00:11:37.760 And, so, let me give you just an example.
00:11:42.220 Home Depot now is selling entire homes.
00:11:45.780 So, you can order a Home Depot,
00:11:48.700 one of these little small homes that comes ready to assemble.
00:11:54.620 And they have a pretty big variety of them now.
00:11:57.740 And they have, I guess they've got their bathroom, bedroom, kitchen, little deal.
00:12:02.680 And you just snap it together.
00:12:04.920 And the cost, I think the high-end one with two bedrooms was $44,000.
00:12:13.720 So, that's where the, you know, the profits all built in, $44,000.
00:12:17.840 Now, of course, you'd need land and connect to systems and local permits and stuff like that.
00:12:23.500 So, I don't know what you would be in all-in.
00:12:27.120 But, you know, you can see where this is heading.
00:12:31.560 On top of that, so I tweeted that, that Home Depot had these new things.
00:12:37.460 And I said, imagine, you know, even though Home Depot is a fine company.
00:12:42.180 I mean, I have only good things to say about Home Depot as a company.
00:12:45.540 But imagine if these little small homes were designed by Apple.
00:12:52.200 How much better would they be?
00:12:54.200 Because Apple knows how to do human design.
00:12:57.420 They would build prototypes.
00:12:59.460 They would test it endlessly.
00:13:01.160 They would figure out what works and what doesn't.
00:13:03.280 They'd tweak it.
00:13:04.260 And then they'd really get you something.
00:13:06.380 But the way homes are built today,
00:13:08.580 I'm pretty sure somebody just designs it on paper and then builds it.
00:13:11.400 But I think that's it.
00:13:14.080 Am I wrong?
00:13:15.460 And maybe they learned something from one they'd seen before.
00:13:19.040 And when they took classes, somebody said,
00:13:21.520 don't make this mistake or that mistake.
00:13:23.660 So they do learn from their mistakes.
00:13:25.920 But it's nothing like design.
00:13:29.160 I don't think.
00:13:30.480 Even if you can build a 3D model and tour it with the software,
00:13:34.660 which you can do,
00:13:35.660 you don't really know what it's like to live in it.
00:13:37.980 So imagine taking the modern design capabilities of an Apple.
00:13:44.460 I would say similar to Google or Tesla,
00:13:47.600 just to pick three companies.
00:13:49.660 Amazon.
00:13:50.480 Amazon, same thing.
00:13:51.960 So imagine taking that level of design expertise,
00:13:56.940 figuring out what people really need in the modern world,
00:13:59.800 which is completely different than how homes are designed now,
00:14:02.760 and then building the good version.
00:14:06.760 Basically, the iPhone version of a home.
00:14:10.940 Now, by that, I do not mean overly technically complicated.
00:14:16.320 It could be the opposite.
00:14:17.960 But I mean, the iPhone was such a difference from any other kind of phone.
00:14:22.280 That's what I'm talking about.
00:14:24.220 So there's this company called CoverBuild.
00:14:27.440 I think it's one word.
00:14:29.900 If you want to follow them, it's at CoverBuild.
00:14:34.000 C-O-V-E-R-B-U-I-L-D. 1.00
00:14:37.800 CoverBuild.
00:14:38.920 And they build, it's a startup,
00:14:41.320 and they're making homes that are like,
00:14:44.540 they describe it, like Lego blocks.
00:14:47.540 How many times have we all talked about that, right?
00:14:50.280 Why can't they make a home that you could just put together,
00:14:53.140 like Sears used to do, except stop saying that?
00:14:57.500 The first person who says Sears used to make kits,
00:15:01.040 I'm going to block you.
00:15:03.800 Because here's the important thing.
00:15:07.140 Yes, it's been done in the worst possible way in the past.
00:15:11.680 There's nothing like what I'm talking about.
00:15:13.540 I'm talking about the best possible way.
00:15:15.140 So the fact that the Model T once existed
00:15:17.880 should not inform you whether you should buy a Tesla.
00:15:23.420 They're completely different products
00:15:25.200 by the time you fast-forward all the improvements.
00:15:29.000 So now CoverBuild has this Lego-like thing,
00:15:31.420 and based on the video,
00:15:32.840 it looks like you don't have to cut anything.
00:15:36.500 It looks like it comes with, like, panels.
00:15:38.820 So there's wall panels and floor panels,
00:15:40.820 and it looks like some kind of ceiling or roof panels.
00:15:46.180 Now, they're a little boxy,
00:15:48.540 because it's easier to make boxy stuff.
00:15:51.680 But if you make things boxy and well-designed,
00:15:56.420 meaning that you've got lots of glass windows on one side
00:15:59.220 and, you know, you've made the best use of space,
00:16:02.680 you probably have something pretty good.
00:16:04.760 And then if you put these homes in an organized community
00:16:08.340 where you've got things like forced ways
00:16:12.800 for people to interact,
00:16:14.500 in other words, you're making people interact
00:16:16.420 so that they have a social life
00:16:19.160 and they meet their neighbors and stuff like that.
00:16:21.840 So if you designed your community,
00:16:23.440 and by the way, this is done in senior communities already,
00:16:27.120 here are the following problems
00:16:28.760 that you could eliminate by designing your house
00:16:31.920 and your community from scratch.
00:16:36.280 Now, forget about the tiny part.
00:16:39.240 All right?
00:16:39.900 So the two things that we should forget about
00:16:42.120 in this conversation are Sears used to make kits.
00:16:45.980 No, that's the old primitive way.
00:16:48.740 It's irrelevant to what we're talking about.
00:16:53.280 Yeah.
00:16:54.380 And then the other thing was what I just mentioned.
00:16:57.340 Tiny.
00:16:58.360 So don't assume that tiny is the goal.
00:17:01.580 They could be tiny, but they don't have to be.
00:17:04.540 Tiny is just one way to save money,
00:17:06.520 and it's probably the worst way.
00:17:07.620 I'd make them a little bit spacier, actually,
00:17:10.600 so that they're the right space for living.
00:17:14.460 But here's what you could solve
00:17:15.760 if you just designed your house
00:17:18.220 and your community right.
00:17:20.320 You would save maybe 80% on your budget.
00:17:26.160 So I think that's completely doable.
00:17:28.940 Let's say one person living alone
00:17:30.960 could probably reduce their living expense by 80%
00:17:34.660 if they lived in a place that was designed for that purpose
00:17:39.240 and also to make it a good place to live.
00:17:41.880 You could, of course, be so green
00:17:43.800 that there's no fossil fuels used at all.
00:17:46.880 You could make every small house
00:17:49.220 sort of have a Tesla battery attached to it.
00:17:54.840 Of course, that's going to run up to cost another $20,000
00:17:57.900 or whatever once you're all in.
00:18:01.020 But you could make a community that's completely green,
00:18:04.940 as green as electricity can be.
00:18:07.580 You could get rid of loneliness
00:18:10.740 because you designed the community
00:18:12.320 so there's some forced interaction.
00:18:14.280 Maybe there's some apps that connect to everybody.
00:18:16.640 You could reduce medical costs
00:18:18.160 by having more places that people walk
00:18:21.920 and go outside and get vitamin D.
00:18:24.260 So basically, you create a place
00:18:25.600 where people just are automatically healthier
00:18:27.960 because they walk to the store
00:18:30.260 and they're getting outside
00:18:31.340 and they're meeting their neighbors
00:18:32.560 and all that stuff.
00:18:34.900 And they've saved so much money
00:18:36.080 they can all have health care.
00:18:38.680 Transportation, you could completely solve it
00:18:40.720 by having everything you need in the community.
00:18:43.040 You could get rid of crime.
00:18:45.720 You could just completely get rid of crime
00:18:47.500 by having cameras everywhere.
00:18:50.960 Now, again, you might say to me,
00:18:52.720 Scott, I don't want cameras everywhere.
00:18:54.760 Well, then maybe the public cameras,
00:18:57.120 I'm only talking about in public spaces,
00:18:58.760 but maybe the public cameras could have,
00:19:02.160 you know, you have to have a court order
00:19:03.580 to look at them or something,
00:19:04.780 so you'd have to have cause.
00:19:06.420 So you could see how you could design crime
00:19:08.720 right out of it.
00:19:09.860 How about education?
00:19:13.280 Homeschooling would be easy
00:19:15.540 if you designed the community for it, wouldn't it?
00:19:19.720 You just design, you know, micro classrooms
00:19:21.860 for five to ten kids
00:19:23.820 and you just schedule them
00:19:25.620 for whatever, you know, Guardian is there
00:19:28.980 plus whatever Zoom video is the class itself,
00:19:31.880 however they do it.
00:19:33.200 So it seems like if you designed it
00:19:34.700 from the ground up,
00:19:36.120 you could just solve systemic racism,
00:19:39.540 meaning that every kid,
00:19:42.740 even with low income,
00:19:43.960 would have enough money to live there
00:19:45.940 because it would be so cheap,
00:19:47.100 and then they'd have as good a school
00:19:48.740 as everybody else
00:19:49.500 because it would just be all, you know,
00:19:51.480 whatever is the best school designed,
00:19:53.140 I don't know what it is.
00:19:55.620 So he says,
00:19:56.820 dude, your opinions are creepy. 0.57
00:19:59.720 Now, what did I say there was an opinion?
00:20:04.460 Did anybody hear an opinion yet?
00:20:08.400 I don't know that there was any opinion here,
00:20:10.760 was there?
00:20:12.120 Because I'm saying things
00:20:13.240 that I think everybody would agree with
00:20:14.680 every part of it.
00:20:15.900 I'm not sure that even qualifies as an opinion
00:20:18.320 if everybody would agree.
00:20:20.160 So let me say the things
00:20:23.420 that I think you're thinking
00:20:24.460 and then see if that sounds right.
00:20:28.840 You're probably thinking the following things.
00:20:31.780 If it's organized like a commune,
00:20:34.780 it's going to be sort of communist
00:20:36.580 and not work
00:20:37.420 and nobody's ever made that work.
00:20:39.760 So why would you do that?
00:20:41.900 So I'm assuming you wouldn't do that.
00:20:43.820 You wouldn't design it a way
00:20:45.240 that doesn't work.
00:20:46.240 You would test it
00:20:47.820 until you knew it worked.
00:20:49.660 So if you're saying
00:20:50.600 don't do the things
00:20:51.480 that haven't worked in the past,
00:20:53.360 I'm saying that's exactly the idea.
00:20:55.360 Don't do the things
00:20:56.240 that haven't worked in the past.
00:20:58.120 That's the one thing you can rule out.
00:21:00.280 Hasn't worked in the past.
00:21:03.760 The other thing is
00:21:04.860 people are saying
00:21:05.820 it's like dystopian.
00:21:07.160 You won't have choices.
00:21:08.820 That's not true.
00:21:10.600 The cover build homes
00:21:12.600 are built
00:21:13.260 so you can reconfigure them
00:21:14.860 in an infinite variety of ways.
00:21:18.220 Infinite variety.
00:21:19.880 And you can imagine
00:21:21.020 that that would only improve over time.
00:21:23.700 So I think the current models,
00:21:25.680 it looks like the wall panels
00:21:27.120 have a structural part
00:21:29.280 and then a part
00:21:30.120 that's just a decorative inside cover.
00:21:33.200 But you can imagine
00:21:33.960 that the decorative inside covers
00:21:35.860 would start basic,
00:21:37.640 but then there'd be the one
00:21:39.480 that looks like a brick wall,
00:21:40.860 one that looks like anything else.
00:21:42.480 So you can imagine
00:21:43.260 that it would start basic
00:21:44.200 and then you could do
00:21:44.940 whatever you wanted with it.
00:21:46.620 So I would imagine
00:21:48.080 that the opportunity
00:21:49.920 to be customized and unique
00:21:52.440 would go up, not down.
00:21:56.600 Right?
00:21:57.340 So why would you assume
00:21:58.580 that any new design
00:22:01.060 that's meant to be better
00:22:02.560 would be substantially worse
00:22:04.700 in some way
00:22:05.700 that you can identify?
00:22:07.640 That's not the idea.
00:22:09.100 The idea is that
00:22:09.860 none of it's worse.
00:22:11.380 So if you're thinking,
00:22:12.640 yes, but this part will be worse,
00:22:14.100 well, that's not the idea.
00:22:15.400 The idea is that
00:22:16.260 every part of the living experience
00:22:18.100 would be better,
00:22:19.560 including it would look better,
00:22:22.040 feel better,
00:22:23.200 be cheaper,
00:22:24.480 more efficient,
00:22:25.740 it would give you a social life
00:22:27.380 just by forcing you
00:22:29.200 to interact with people,
00:22:31.320 et cetera.
00:22:31.580 So it's interesting.
00:22:35.920 You can see people's personalities
00:22:37.400 by how they respond
00:22:38.460 to something like this.
00:22:41.340 I think the personalities
00:22:43.180 that say this won't work
00:22:44.780 and here's the reason
00:22:45.740 probably have trouble
00:22:48.380 succeeding in life.
00:22:50.380 Whereas the people who say,
00:22:52.500 well, if the idea
00:22:53.320 is to solve all those problems,
00:22:55.140 then I'll go along
00:22:56.260 with that idea
00:22:56.860 that I don't know
00:22:57.980 if you can do it,
00:22:59.000 but if you could solve
00:22:59.820 all those problems,
00:23:00.620 I'd live there.
00:23:04.780 You won't own anything
00:23:06.000 and be happy about it.
00:23:07.060 Who said that?
00:23:08.940 Who said you won't own anything?
00:23:11.560 Everybody's just throwing in
00:23:12.660 like ridiculous ideas
00:23:14.040 so that you've imagined
00:23:16.180 something wrong with it.
00:23:18.040 Why would I say
00:23:18.960 there would be no private ownership
00:23:20.640 of anything?
00:23:21.580 Nobody said that.
00:23:23.300 I'd say whatever works.
00:23:25.000 And it could be
00:23:25.720 that there are different models.
00:23:27.840 Could be.
00:23:29.820 I feel like
00:23:31.840 one of the models
00:23:32.580 will be that you can buy
00:23:33.700 one for yourself
00:23:34.640 and one to rent.
00:23:36.800 And some people will say,
00:23:37.860 I'll just build
00:23:38.360 two units at a time,
00:23:39.700 one for me
00:23:40.260 and one to rent.
00:23:41.740 I think that'll be a thing.
00:23:45.840 Oh, that's a quote
00:23:46.780 from the W.
00:23:48.720 Oh, cheap house,
00:23:49.680 inexpensive land.
00:23:50.460 All right,
00:23:50.720 here's the second part
00:23:51.500 of the thing.
00:23:52.860 Am I wrong
00:23:53.840 that we've reached a point
00:23:55.100 where you could
00:23:56.180 make better use
00:23:57.680 of more remote land,
00:24:00.560 meaning that you don't need
00:24:01.940 to drive to the city
00:24:02.900 for as much?
00:24:04.220 Is that,
00:24:04.760 would you say that's true?
00:24:06.280 In other words,
00:24:07.680 could I put a community
00:24:09.120 on relatively cheap land
00:24:11.480 where that didn't
00:24:12.940 used to make sense?
00:24:14.120 You know,
00:24:14.440 in the old,
00:24:15.180 old days,
00:24:15.840 you wanted to be
00:24:16.440 near a coast
00:24:17.180 and then you needed
00:24:18.940 to be near
00:24:20.320 where the food supply
00:24:21.460 or the water is.
00:24:22.740 You still need to be
00:24:24.020 where the water is.
00:24:25.420 But if you had water,
00:24:29.540 you're in pretty good shape,
00:24:32.820 aren't you?
00:24:34.220 So probably if you just
00:24:35.920 went where the water source
00:24:37.100 is good,
00:24:38.320 you'd be okay.
00:24:39.500 Now,
00:24:39.740 have you seen
00:24:40.080 the inventions
00:24:40.820 that will take
00:24:42.320 moisture out of the air,
00:24:44.560 even in the desert?
00:24:46.360 How many of you
00:24:46.900 have seen that?
00:24:47.540 I don't know
00:24:48.160 how commercialized
00:24:50.080 that is.
00:24:50.620 But it's a thing.
00:24:51.520 It's a device
00:24:52.320 that sucks moisture
00:24:53.900 out of the air
00:24:54.440 and actually can create
00:24:55.720 a fair amount
00:24:57.240 of drinking water.
00:24:59.820 And so,
00:25:00.320 here's what I imagine
00:25:01.800 will happen.
00:25:04.360 I imagine that
00:25:05.460 the small home industry
00:25:07.660 will get somebody
00:25:09.900 building the infrastructure
00:25:11.120 part of the home
00:25:12.000 and then other people
00:25:13.680 building the walls
00:25:14.860 and windows and doors.
00:25:15.840 So the infrastructure
00:25:17.600 would be like
00:25:18.600 a Tesla battery
00:25:19.760 with solar panels,
00:25:22.340 some kind of
00:25:22.840 a Bill Gates toilet
00:25:24.260 so you don't need
00:25:25.320 actual sewage.
00:25:27.760 So Bill Gates
00:25:28.860 was developing
00:25:29.580 this toilet
00:25:30.520 for Africa
00:25:31.160 where somehow
00:25:32.740 it just recycles
00:25:33.680 everything
00:25:34.040 and it just doesn't
00:25:35.320 need to be connected
00:25:36.040 to the grid.
00:25:37.400 So if you get
00:25:37.960 your electric
00:25:38.480 off the grid,
00:25:39.680 you could get
00:25:40.220 your toilet
00:25:40.760 off the grid.
00:25:41.920 I don't know
00:25:42.420 how much of your
00:25:43.060 other sewage,
00:25:43.800 maybe all of it.
00:25:44.600 And then you
00:25:47.760 would want to
00:25:48.180 get your water
00:25:48.940 off the grid
00:25:49.660 and it's possible
00:25:51.500 that maybe
00:25:53.300 some future
00:25:54.000 version of this
00:25:54.800 device that
00:25:55.440 sucks moisture
00:25:56.160 out of the air
00:25:56.780 could be enough.
00:25:59.240 Maybe you could
00:25:59.940 just have that
00:26:00.440 thing working
00:26:01.400 all night long
00:26:02.120 producing water
00:26:02.960 and you fill up
00:26:04.220 your tank
00:26:04.680 and that's all
00:26:05.300 you need for the day.
00:26:06.000 So roads,
00:26:09.740 you would need
00:26:10.240 roads,
00:26:11.480 but you would
00:26:13.420 only need one
00:26:14.200 major road
00:26:15.100 to the
00:26:16.680 development.
00:26:18.920 And then once
00:26:19.540 in the development,
00:26:20.440 you wouldn't need
00:26:21.100 roads beyond
00:26:22.200 what electric
00:26:23.120 vehicles could do
00:26:24.080 to deliver stuff
00:26:24.960 back and forth.
00:26:25.780 But I guess you'd
00:26:26.320 need to bring in
00:26:27.760 some refrigerators
00:26:29.520 now and then,
00:26:30.160 so I guess you'd
00:26:30.980 need to be able
00:26:31.380 to deliver.
00:26:32.180 You need to
00:26:37.080 purify waste
00:26:38.120 now.
00:26:41.420 Anyway,
00:26:42.440 but I could
00:26:43.340 see that we
00:26:44.140 would have
00:26:44.540 indoor farms,
00:26:46.320 so you'd get
00:26:47.340 rid of all
00:26:47.740 your pesticide
00:26:48.900 and problems
00:26:49.620 like that,
00:26:50.840 all your
00:26:51.960 weather problems.
00:26:53.780 So you
00:26:55.640 probably would
00:26:56.300 have passive
00:26:58.240 cooling,
00:26:59.740 so the air
00:27:00.840 would probably
00:27:01.200 be flowing
00:27:01.680 through tunnels
00:27:02.440 or through
00:27:03.000 berms or
00:27:03.620 something.
00:27:05.780 So anyway,
00:27:06.700 you could imagine
00:27:07.300 that you could
00:27:07.780 get the cost
00:27:08.280 down by 80%
00:27:09.180 and the lifestyle
00:27:10.440 up by 500%.
00:27:13.120 And that,
00:27:15.460 ladies and 0.98
00:27:16.400 gentlemen,
00:27:17.260 plus legal
00:27:17.960 cannabis is
00:27:19.240 everything you
00:27:19.760 need.
00:27:20.880 You know,
00:27:21.500 aquaponics,
00:27:23.980 are you talking
00:27:24.740 about fish
00:27:27.060 farms or
00:27:28.220 hydroponics?
00:27:31.680 hydro?
00:27:35.700 I think fish
00:27:39.220 farms tend
00:27:39.860 to be a
00:27:40.540 kind of a
00:27:41.880 nasty way
00:27:42.740 to grow
00:27:44.620 food.
00:27:45.720 I'm surprised
00:27:46.320 that nobody's
00:27:46.840 made a fish
00:27:47.360 farm that
00:27:47.940 doesn't recycle
00:27:49.420 the waste
00:27:49.960 that's in the
00:27:50.660 fish farm
00:27:51.660 more effectively.
00:27:53.260 It seems like
00:27:54.080 that would be
00:27:54.380 an obvious
00:27:54.760 thing.
00:27:55.020 yeah,
00:27:56.220 tilapia is
00:27:56.880 just,
00:27:58.180 I used to
00:27:59.160 eat a lot
00:27:59.480 of tilapia
00:28:00.140 until I
00:28:00.800 found out
00:28:01.740 about it.
00:28:03.960 I won't be
00:28:06.660 eating any more
00:28:07.260 tilapia.
00:28:12.740 Fish farm
00:28:13.580 water is
00:28:14.080 great fertilizer.
00:28:14.960 Is that true?
00:28:16.960 So if you
00:28:18.380 had a fish
00:28:19.420 farm and
00:28:21.240 a vegetable
00:28:22.780 farm, you
00:28:24.560 could use
00:28:25.000 the fish
00:28:25.900 waste to,
00:28:29.200 now what
00:28:29.580 do you feed
00:28:29.940 the fish?
00:28:31.300 You feed the
00:28:32.160 fish on the
00:28:32.660 fish, right?
00:28:36.540 Can you feed
00:28:37.400 the fish the
00:28:38.100 waste that you
00:28:38.920 don't use from
00:28:39.660 the vegetables?
00:28:42.640 Or do they
00:28:43.420 have to eat
00:28:43.960 something alive?
00:28:45.700 So could
00:28:48.720 you have,
00:28:50.400 obviously
00:28:51.040 somebody's
00:28:51.640 thought of
00:28:51.900 this.
00:28:53.260 So is there
00:28:53.880 a fish that
00:28:54.620 would eat
00:28:55.100 the parts
00:28:58.360 of the
00:28:58.820 plant that
00:28:59.480 we don't
00:28:59.820 want?
00:29:02.040 Like the
00:29:02.820 corn cobs
00:29:03.960 and the stuff
00:29:04.420 you don't
00:29:04.720 want?
00:29:05.260 Could you
00:29:05.560 feed your
00:29:05.920 fish with
00:29:06.260 that?
00:29:08.520 No, they 1.00
00:29:09.300 eat a mush
00:29:10.420 of what?
00:29:11.720 I don't know,
00:29:12.180 it feels like
00:29:12.580 you could.
00:29:14.720 I've got a
00:29:15.400 feeling that
00:29:15.680 something like
00:29:16.280 that's going
00:29:16.600 to happen.
00:29:17.640 All right,
00:29:17.880 well, today
00:29:18.360 was the day
00:29:19.060 we are not
00:29:19.640 going to talk
00:29:20.000 about any
00:29:20.480 sad news.
00:29:22.100 We're just
00:29:22.720 chatting because
00:29:23.520 I know that
00:29:24.460 you like to
00:29:26.660 be here at
00:29:27.100 this time of
00:29:27.600 day.
00:29:28.140 Now, is there
00:29:28.580 anything else
00:29:29.120 that is not
00:29:30.640 sad and tragic
00:29:31.560 that we could
00:29:32.040 talk about?
00:29:33.460 Can we talk
00:29:34.020 about how
00:29:34.960 awesome your
00:29:35.560 weekend is
00:29:36.160 going to be?
00:29:37.360 The golden
00:29:38.100 age?
00:29:40.960 I really
00:29:41.600 think that
00:29:42.080 the building
00:29:43.720 industry is
00:29:44.620 going to
00:29:44.820 have such
00:29:45.320 a golden
00:29:47.500 age that
00:29:48.700 it will
00:29:48.880 drive
00:29:49.180 everything.
00:29:51.680 Because,
00:29:52.320 well, I
00:29:52.740 don't believe
00:29:53.320 that housing,
00:29:54.520 this is ironic,
00:29:56.160 the one thing
00:29:56.980 that I don't
00:29:57.560 think better
00:29:58.300 housing will
00:29:58.900 fix and
00:29:59.840 cheaper
00:30:00.120 housing,
00:30:01.160 what's the
00:30:01.580 one thing
00:30:01.980 it won't
00:30:02.280 fix?
00:30:05.120 Homelessness,
00:30:06.140 ironically.
00:30:07.640 It's the one
00:30:08.180 thing it won't
00:30:08.640 fix.
00:30:09.940 Because what
00:30:10.520 causes homelessness
00:30:11.340 is people
00:30:11.920 who don't
00:30:12.240 want to be
00:30:12.580 in a home
00:30:13.000 for the
00:30:13.660 most part
00:30:14.120 because they're
00:30:15.060 on drugs
00:30:15.580 or they have
00:30:16.440 mental problems.
00:30:17.700 It's not a
00:30:18.460 lack of
00:30:18.940 physical space
00:30:20.200 or economics,
00:30:21.580 it's people
00:30:22.060 who literally
00:30:22.620 don't want to
00:30:23.440 be indoors
00:30:23.920 because they
00:30:25.120 don't want
00:30:25.420 those restrictions.
00:30:30.880 This housing
00:30:31.640 idea hinges
00:30:32.260 on nuclear
00:30:32.840 power availability.
00:30:34.240 Well, that
00:30:34.580 would help,
00:30:35.280 but it doesn't
00:30:35.860 hinge on it.
00:30:37.560 I think if
00:30:38.500 you had your
00:30:39.000 own Tesla
00:30:40.840 batteries
00:30:41.400 and a
00:30:43.640 very
00:30:44.220 energy
00:30:45.060 efficient
00:30:45.540 place
00:30:46.240 and solar
00:30:47.560 panels,
00:30:48.740 I think
00:30:49.100 you could
00:30:49.380 live off
00:30:50.760 the grid.
00:30:51.500 We're probably
00:30:52.040 80% of the
00:30:53.240 way toward
00:30:53.920 having a
00:30:54.920 house that
00:30:55.300 can live
00:30:55.680 off the
00:30:56.040 grid
00:30:56.320 productively
00:30:57.500 and really
00:30:58.820 economically.
00:31:00.360 I know
00:31:00.960 people make
00:31:01.520 it work,
00:31:02.360 but I think
00:31:02.700 you have to
00:31:03.020 work at
00:31:03.600 it.
00:31:04.920 But we're
00:31:05.300 pretty close
00:31:05.980 to making
00:31:06.340 it just a
00:31:06.820 kit,
00:31:07.220 aren't we,
00:31:07.580 to live
00:31:07.980 off the
00:31:08.320 grid?
00:31:10.840 say
00:31:13.600 gridder?
00:31:15.620 Is that
00:31:16.760 like the
00:31:17.260 bad name
00:31:19.420 for somebody
00:31:19.880 who lives
00:31:20.260 on the
00:31:21.080 grid or
00:31:21.420 off the
00:31:21.720 grid?
00:31:24.640 There's
00:31:25.080 not enough
00:31:25.480 electricity for
00:31:26.600 everyone using
00:31:27.400 it for cars,
00:31:28.140 et cetera.
00:31:28.680 Well, that's
00:31:29.080 why the
00:31:29.940 community would
00:31:30.600 have to make
00:31:31.100 its own
00:31:31.420 electricity,
00:31:32.440 both for
00:31:33.700 your
00:31:34.180 transportation
00:31:35.180 as well
00:31:37.280 as your
00:31:37.540 house.
00:31:37.780 Yeah,
00:31:42.100 you're
00:31:44.280 seeing more
00:31:44.760 and more
00:31:45.220 energy around
00:31:47.140 the small
00:31:47.600 nuclear plants,
00:31:48.600 right?
00:31:50.020 Almost every
00:31:50.900 day now you're
00:31:51.460 seeing positive
00:31:52.300 articles about
00:31:52.980 nuclear energy.
00:31:54.480 Have you
00:31:54.760 noticed that?
00:31:56.100 That the
00:31:56.840 coverage of
00:31:57.680 nuclear energy,
00:31:59.280 I'd say in
00:31:59.900 the last
00:32:00.600 six months,
00:32:04.260 correct me if
00:32:05.020 I'm wrong,
00:32:06.300 in the last
00:32:06.780 six months,
00:32:07.660 every story
00:32:08.320 about nuclear
00:32:08.940 power has
00:32:09.540 been positive.
00:32:11.780 Yes or
00:32:12.400 no?
00:32:13.380 Last six
00:32:14.060 months, every
00:32:14.800 story about
00:32:15.460 nuclear energy
00:32:16.200 has been
00:32:16.520 positive.
00:32:18.300 Right?
00:32:19.100 And there
00:32:19.360 have been a
00:32:19.640 lot of
00:32:19.920 them.
00:32:20.400 And they're
00:32:20.740 all about
00:32:21.100 breakthroughs,
00:32:21.940 and something's
00:32:22.500 approved, and
00:32:23.320 old plants are
00:32:24.560 being opened
00:32:25.000 up, and
00:32:25.640 they found
00:32:26.640 new ways to
00:32:27.400 convert fuel,
00:32:28.520 and there's
00:32:29.220 a new fusion
00:32:29.960 record being
00:32:31.660 set.
00:32:33.380 Yeah.
00:32:33.700 Yeah.
00:32:36.780 And I feel
00:32:40.020 like collectively
00:32:42.660 we were part
00:32:44.220 of a very
00:32:45.720 large project
00:32:46.560 to make that
00:32:47.100 happen.
00:32:48.360 So do any
00:32:49.020 of you feel
00:32:49.540 any ownership
00:32:52.120 of that?
00:32:54.780 You know, it's
00:32:55.840 hard to say how
00:32:56.400 much any one
00:32:57.120 effect makes,
00:32:58.100 but I feel
00:32:58.520 like you were
00:33:00.120 a well-informed
00:33:01.080 group and
00:33:02.200 probably had a
00:33:02.980 lot to do
00:33:03.440 with spreading
00:33:04.040 the word.
00:33:05.960 Because there
00:33:07.360 was probably
00:33:07.840 a five to
00:33:10.560 ten year
00:33:11.060 time lag
00:33:11.900 between when
00:33:13.400 nuclear just
00:33:14.720 made complete
00:33:15.580 sense, and
00:33:17.160 when people
00:33:17.620 realized it.
00:33:19.160 Because I
00:33:19.800 think nuclear
00:33:20.260 had to, you
00:33:21.320 know, mature
00:33:22.140 just a little
00:33:22.740 bit to solve
00:33:23.800 the risk
00:33:25.000 problems and
00:33:25.780 solve the
00:33:26.240 waste problems,
00:33:27.840 et cetera.
00:33:28.680 And now that
00:33:29.280 it has,
00:33:31.740 and now that
00:33:32.220 it has, it
00:33:33.600 just took a
00:33:34.020 while for the
00:33:34.600 public to
00:33:35.220 figure it
00:33:35.600 out, and
00:33:36.460 then the
00:33:38.340 politicians.
00:33:46.520 Is housing
00:33:47.340 the new
00:33:47.740 thing?
00:33:48.060 I think so.
00:33:49.020 I think housing
00:33:49.760 is the next
00:33:50.320 thing.
00:33:50.820 And here's
00:33:51.180 why.
00:33:51.880 You have all
00:33:52.560 these enormous
00:33:53.200 companies.
00:33:54.060 This is, by
00:33:54.480 the way, this
00:33:54.860 was Professor
00:33:56.340 Scott Galloway's
00:33:57.540 insight.
00:33:59.740 Companies that
00:34:00.500 are as big
00:34:01.000 as Apple,
00:34:03.100 they can't
00:34:03.900 do a small
00:34:04.500 product.
00:34:06.140 So they
00:34:06.760 can't say,
00:34:07.260 all right,
00:34:07.580 next we're
00:34:08.180 going to
00:34:08.280 make the
00:34:08.640 pencil
00:34:08.960 sharpener,
00:34:10.360 that's the
00:34:10.740 Apple pencil
00:34:11.360 sharpener,
00:34:12.600 because the
00:34:13.160 total worldwide
00:34:14.340 market for
00:34:15.020 pencil sharpeners
00:34:15.860 is too small.
00:34:17.260 So if you're
00:34:17.940 Apple, you've
00:34:18.460 got to bite
00:34:18.940 off entire
00:34:19.960 industries, like
00:34:21.220 the big ones.
00:34:22.860 So one of
00:34:23.780 those thoughts
00:34:24.240 is that Apple
00:34:24.860 will take on
00:34:25.540 education, for
00:34:26.460 example.
00:34:27.960 But housing is
00:34:28.940 another one, or
00:34:29.740 cars.
00:34:30.660 You know, you
00:34:30.920 would expect
00:34:31.460 Apple is going
00:34:32.860 to make a
00:34:33.160 self-driving
00:34:33.680 car at some
00:34:34.260 point.
00:34:34.840 It almost
00:34:35.320 has to, because
00:34:36.880 it has to
00:34:37.300 take on
00:34:37.660 gigantic markets.
00:34:39.360 Likewise,
00:34:40.520 Amazon, Amazon
00:34:42.360 sort of had to
00:34:43.500 get into the
00:34:44.040 grocery business,
00:34:45.380 you know, the
00:34:45.800 Whole Foods
00:34:46.660 sort of model.
00:34:48.240 They sort of
00:34:48.680 had to, because
00:34:50.160 there's not that
00:34:51.040 much left that's
00:34:51.880 big enough for
00:34:53.040 an Amazon to
00:34:54.060 absorb and
00:34:55.740 make money
00:34:56.120 from.
00:34:59.740 All right, I'm
00:35:04.820 just looking at
00:35:05.260 some of your
00:35:05.640 comments.
00:35:08.600 Can we
00:35:08.960 reprogram ourselves
00:35:10.000 to be more
00:35:10.340 attracted to
00:35:10.840 our partners?
00:35:13.000 Oh, so I'm
00:35:13.620 asking, can we
00:35:14.320 reprogram ourselves
00:35:15.600 to be more
00:35:17.000 attracted to our
00:35:17.940 partners?
00:35:19.160 And the answer
00:35:19.940 is, your
00:35:22.100 partner can
00:35:22.840 program you to
00:35:24.480 be more
00:35:24.880 attracted to
00:35:25.580 them.
00:35:25.840 it would be
00:35:28.040 really hard to
00:35:28.760 just sort of
00:35:29.320 talk yourself
00:35:30.140 into it.
00:35:31.320 I mean, you
00:35:31.640 could, but that
00:35:32.680 would be the
00:35:33.060 hard way.
00:35:34.120 The better way
00:35:34.940 would be for
00:35:36.700 each of you to
00:35:37.480 learn how to
00:35:38.240 make the other
00:35:39.780 one more
00:35:40.300 attractive.
00:35:41.380 And how hard
00:35:42.420 would that be?
00:35:43.800 Well, you
00:35:44.760 would just pair
00:35:45.580 something that
00:35:47.400 you both like
00:35:48.200 with each other.
00:35:50.180 So the more
00:35:50.760 things you do
00:35:51.460 that is just
00:35:52.600 naturally
00:35:53.160 stimulating and
00:35:54.780 fun,
00:35:55.840 as paired
00:35:56.420 with each
00:35:56.800 other, the
00:35:57.160 more you're
00:35:58.120 going to be
00:35:58.360 attracted to
00:35:58.840 each other.
00:35:59.600 And the more
00:36:00.080 you spend
00:36:00.500 doing unpleasant
00:36:02.160 things together,
00:36:03.300 the less you
00:36:03.920 will be
00:36:04.160 attracted.
00:36:05.100 And you'll
00:36:05.420 think there's
00:36:06.400 some kind of
00:36:06.800 natural force.
00:36:09.120 You know, it's
00:36:09.360 like, oh, we're
00:36:09.860 just getting used
00:36:10.340 to each other.
00:36:11.100 No, it's
00:36:12.120 because when you
00:36:12.700 met, you went
00:36:13.480 on dates.
00:36:15.500 Right?
00:36:16.340 When you first
00:36:16.920 met, you went
00:36:17.360 on dates.
00:36:18.420 And you were
00:36:19.020 thinking, ah,
00:36:19.760 tonight's the
00:36:20.260 night.
00:36:20.620 I think we're
00:36:21.040 going to do
00:36:21.380 it tonight.
00:36:22.580 And it was
00:36:23.200 all good.
00:36:23.920 And then you
00:36:24.380 got together,
00:36:25.020 there, and
00:36:25.780 then what
00:36:26.060 do you
00:36:26.220 do?
00:36:27.980 Whose turn
00:36:29.520 is it to
00:36:30.100 clean up the
00:36:31.040 cat's vomit
00:36:32.500 from the
00:36:32.960 rug?
00:36:34.580 I'll get
00:36:35.320 it.
00:36:36.200 All right.
00:36:36.880 If you're
00:36:37.340 doing that,
00:36:37.880 I'll pick up
00:36:39.160 some groceries.
00:36:39.820 So basically,
00:36:43.180 you go from
00:36:45.100 pairing your
00:36:45.740 partner with
00:36:46.580 sex and
00:36:47.920 good food and
00:36:49.100 smelling good
00:36:50.640 and having a
00:36:51.700 shower and
00:36:52.580 everything that
00:36:53.940 feels good.
00:36:55.740 That's what you
00:36:56.280 paired them with
00:36:56.900 when you started.
00:36:57.840 And then as
00:36:58.740 soon as you
00:36:59.220 lock them in,
00:37:01.560 you start pairing
00:37:02.760 them with the
00:37:03.460 most awful
00:37:04.240 things, like
00:37:05.880 pain and
00:37:06.780 medical problems
00:37:08.320 and talking
00:37:09.740 about all
00:37:10.900 your problems
00:37:11.560 for the day
00:37:12.260 and all
00:37:13.600 your coworkers
00:37:14.300 are evil
00:37:15.160 and blah,
00:37:16.260 blah.
00:37:16.860 And then
00:37:17.180 every time you
00:37:17.640 see the face
00:37:18.320 of your
00:37:18.660 partner, what
00:37:19.840 do you think?
00:37:21.080 Ooh, yeah.
00:37:22.820 No.
00:37:23.660 After a while,
00:37:24.520 your partner
00:37:24.940 can wear you
00:37:25.700 down.
00:37:26.980 They'll wear
00:37:27.540 you down.
00:37:28.980 And there's
00:37:30.040 nothing but time
00:37:30.900 and focus and
00:37:31.660 repetition.
00:37:32.080 If you
00:37:34.500 pair people
00:37:35.920 with positive
00:37:36.600 thoughts, they
00:37:38.060 become more
00:37:38.800 appealing in
00:37:39.320 your mind.
00:37:39.820 If you pair
00:37:40.260 them with
00:37:40.660 negative thoughts
00:37:41.640 and actions,
00:37:42.740 over time, it
00:37:44.160 all becomes
00:37:44.640 one thing.
00:37:51.560 Then you
00:37:52.260 let yourself
00:37:52.760 go.
00:37:53.280 Yeah.
00:37:53.520 Somebody says
00:37:54.040 then you let
00:37:54.500 yourself go
00:37:55.180 because how
00:37:56.900 much work are
00:37:57.920 you going to
00:37:58.220 put into
00:37:58.800 preparing yourself
00:37:59.900 to take out
00:38:01.300 the garbage
00:38:01.800 and mow
00:38:03.200 the lawn
00:38:03.700 or whatever
00:38:04.020 you're doing.
00:38:05.540 So you'll
00:38:06.400 get ready for
00:38:06.920 a date, but
00:38:08.440 you're not
00:38:08.720 going to put
00:38:09.060 on your
00:38:09.360 nice shirt
00:38:09.900 to mow
00:38:10.420 the lawn
00:38:10.900 necessarily.
00:38:12.520 So, yeah.
00:38:14.180 The reason
00:38:16.120 that things
00:38:16.600 turn out the
00:38:17.180 way things
00:38:17.620 turn out is
00:38:19.340 because people
00:38:20.060 act the way
00:38:20.600 they act.
00:38:21.880 If they were
00:38:22.700 conscious about
00:38:23.700 the fact that
00:38:24.840 every time they
00:38:25.440 pair a negative
00:38:26.280 with a positive,
00:38:27.660 those two things
00:38:29.080 are going to
00:38:29.380 start conflating.
00:38:29.900 as long as
00:38:32.080 you know
00:38:32.340 that, you
00:38:33.580 can manage
00:38:34.120 your mind
00:38:34.740 and the
00:38:35.200 mind of
00:38:35.600 your partner
00:38:36.120 productively.
00:38:39.000 I bet you
00:38:39.520 didn't think I
00:38:40.040 could answer
00:38:40.400 that question,
00:38:41.040 did you?
00:38:42.880 Why you
00:38:43.480 haven't stayed
00:38:43.980 married?
00:38:46.140 Why you
00:38:46.860 haven't stayed
00:38:47.420 married?
00:38:48.420 Well, I
00:38:49.100 don't think the
00:38:49.580 question of
00:38:50.180 whether someone
00:38:50.900 stays married
00:38:51.800 has, you
00:38:54.160 know, there's
00:38:56.120 only one
00:38:56.580 reason to
00:38:57.100 that.
00:38:58.320 I was
00:38:58.880 thinking about
00:38:59.240 this the
00:38:59.560 other day.
00:39:02.620 And you've
00:39:03.260 heard me say
00:39:03.660 this before.
00:39:04.500 A number
00:39:05.020 of people
00:39:05.400 have expressed
00:39:06.720 sympathy or
00:39:09.520 empathy when
00:39:11.620 they heard
00:39:12.020 that I'm
00:39:12.840 going through
00:39:15.180 a divorce.
00:39:16.860 You know,
00:39:17.080 sort of long
00:39:17.660 process thing.
00:39:19.300 But I
00:39:21.340 always get
00:39:22.000 confused by it
00:39:23.060 because I
00:39:23.840 think, and
00:39:24.660 some of the
00:39:25.460 trolls online
00:39:26.780 have been
00:39:27.880 when the
00:39:28.840 trolls come
00:39:29.360 after me,
00:39:30.160 they like to
00:39:31.140 say, so
00:39:32.140 what about
00:39:32.840 your marriage
00:39:33.360 that fell
00:39:33.700 apart?
00:39:35.080 And I'm
00:39:35.380 thinking, is
00:39:36.680 that supposed
00:39:37.140 to bother
00:39:37.660 me?
00:39:38.680 Because that's
00:39:39.600 just my
00:39:39.980 biography.
00:39:41.740 I'm not
00:39:42.500 really bothered
00:39:43.680 by hearing my
00:39:44.460 own biography.
00:39:45.920 Like, I'm
00:39:46.520 pretty sure I
00:39:47.120 know what's
00:39:47.640 happening in
00:39:48.640 my life.
00:39:49.800 But here's
00:39:50.580 what I don't
00:39:52.100 understand.
00:39:53.100 Why would
00:39:53.560 anybody assume
00:39:54.600 that the
00:39:55.720 end of
00:39:56.100 something is
00:39:56.640 a failure?
00:39:58.380 Like, what
00:39:58.740 is the
00:39:59.060 mindset that
00:39:59.860 says that?
00:40:02.880 Because my
00:40:03.680 mindset is,
00:40:04.680 if it
00:40:05.120 worked when
00:40:06.000 it worked,
00:40:07.600 then that
00:40:08.360 part was a
00:40:08.920 success.
00:40:10.300 And then
00:40:10.720 when things
00:40:11.320 that work
00:40:12.220 stop working,
00:40:13.020 for whatever
00:40:13.480 reason, do 0.91
00:40:15.680 you change
00:40:16.360 so that you
00:40:16.860 find some
00:40:17.480 other thing
00:40:18.040 that works?
00:40:18.820 Or do you
00:40:19.360 just keep
00:40:19.720 doing the
00:40:20.080 thing that
00:40:20.400 doesn't work?
00:40:21.020 Is it a
00:40:22.640 failure if
00:40:24.840 you, you
00:40:25.900 know, enjoyed
00:40:26.460 something immensely
00:40:27.280 for some
00:40:27.820 period of
00:40:28.300 time, but
00:40:30.240 then something
00:40:31.520 changes, and
00:40:33.280 then you
00:40:33.540 don't?
00:40:34.820 So should
00:40:35.500 you just
00:40:35.800 keep doing
00:40:36.200 the thing
00:40:36.520 that didn't
00:40:36.880 work?
00:40:37.660 I mean, or
00:40:38.840 must you
00:40:39.860 always fix
00:40:40.560 the old
00:40:40.940 thing?
00:40:42.840 So I'm
00:40:43.360 not sure
00:40:43.660 that there's,
00:40:45.260 I think
00:40:46.500 there's sort
00:40:46.940 of a
00:40:47.260 failure
00:40:47.780 mindset,
00:40:48.980 and then
00:40:49.360 there's a
00:40:50.080 success
00:40:51.340 mindset.
00:40:53.580 And I
00:40:54.620 think you
00:40:55.120 can sort
00:40:55.520 of develop
00:40:56.120 the more
00:40:58.000 productive
00:40:58.820 one over
00:40:59.260 time, simply
00:41:00.760 by reminding
00:41:01.480 yourself to
00:41:02.080 do it, you
00:41:02.520 know, just
00:41:02.880 making it a
00:41:03.420 habit.
00:41:04.660 And I
00:41:05.780 never really
00:41:06.300 see the
00:41:06.660 end of
00:41:07.020 something as
00:41:07.720 a failure,
00:41:09.220 or even a
00:41:10.060 tragedy.
00:41:11.960 Of course, I'm
00:41:13.260 human, so I
00:41:14.360 go through all
00:41:14.860 the same
00:41:15.160 emotions everybody
00:41:15.900 does, but I
00:41:17.060 fairly quickly
00:41:17.860 talk myself
00:41:18.620 out of it.
00:41:20.080 somebody says,
00:41:22.100 why get
00:41:22.400 married to
00:41:22.860 begin with?
00:41:25.160 You know
00:41:25.760 you're going
00:41:26.060 to die, 0.52
00:41:26.500 right?
00:41:28.140 Everybody
00:41:28.540 knows that.
00:41:29.960 So why
00:41:30.560 do anything?
00:41:31.780 Why do
00:41:32.380 anything if
00:41:32.840 you're going
00:41:33.060 to die?
00:41:34.620 It's actually
00:41:35.260 a pretty good
00:41:35.740 question.
00:41:36.760 Why do
00:41:37.400 anything?
00:41:38.500 You're just
00:41:38.980 going to die. 0.95
00:41:39.640 It's not like
00:41:40.040 it lasts
00:41:40.360 forever.
00:41:41.940 And the
00:41:42.340 best I can
00:41:43.260 come up
00:41:43.640 with is the
00:41:44.140 only thing
00:41:44.540 that I know
00:41:45.380 for sure is
00:41:46.980 that some
00:41:47.380 things feel
00:41:47.940 better than
00:41:48.380 other things.
00:41:50.080 Well, I
00:41:50.360 know two
00:41:50.740 things.
00:41:52.400 I know I
00:41:53.300 exist because
00:41:55.540 I'm asking
00:41:56.260 the question.
00:41:57.320 So there
00:41:57.780 has to be
00:41:58.180 something asking
00:41:58.860 the question,
00:41:59.500 so I must
00:41:59.900 exist.
00:42:01.060 And I know
00:42:01.640 that I
00:42:02.160 have an
00:42:02.500 experience.
00:42:03.200 I experience
00:42:03.720 some things
00:42:04.360 like pleasure
00:42:05.340 and some
00:42:06.420 things not.
00:42:07.800 So I try to
00:42:08.600 get more of
00:42:09.000 the pleasure
00:42:09.340 ones.
00:42:10.700 Basically,
00:42:11.420 those are the
00:42:11.760 things you
00:42:12.100 can know.
00:42:13.560 And everything
00:42:14.040 else is a
00:42:14.680 little bit of
00:42:15.080 an interpretation
00:42:15.640 and a
00:42:16.220 guess.
00:42:18.700 Yeah,
00:42:19.020 and I do
00:42:19.980 believe the
00:42:21.000 most likely
00:42:21.720 explanation for
00:42:22.580 reality is
00:42:23.260 that we
00:42:24.420 are in a
00:42:24.920 simulation.
00:42:26.000 Or I
00:42:26.540 am, and
00:42:27.300 you're not
00:42:27.660 real.
00:42:28.460 Or you're
00:42:30.120 real and I'm
00:42:30.640 not.
00:42:31.260 All those
00:42:31.660 possibilities.
00:42:39.160 Oh,
00:42:39.760 please teach
00:42:40.360 me to talk
00:42:40.900 myself out of
00:42:41.640 the failure
00:42:42.120 mindset when
00:42:43.000 relationships end.
00:42:44.060 Oh, easy.
00:42:44.520 easy.
00:42:46.740 Why is it
00:42:47.360 your fault?
00:42:49.540 Why is the
00:42:50.260 end of a
00:42:50.640 relationship
00:42:51.100 your fault?
00:42:53.540 There's no
00:42:54.100 real logic to
00:42:54.740 that.
00:42:54.940 It's just
00:42:55.200 something we
00:42:55.660 feel.
00:42:56.900 Why can't
00:42:57.560 you just
00:42:57.860 say, you
00:43:00.500 know, mashed
00:43:01.260 potatoes and
00:43:03.200 a nail?
00:43:05.500 They don't
00:43:06.100 go together,
00:43:06.680 right?
00:43:07.380 Like if you
00:43:07.880 wanted to
00:43:08.260 pound a nail
00:43:08.920 into a
00:43:09.460 board, you
00:43:10.540 would need
00:43:10.800 something
00:43:11.080 harder like
00:43:11.680 a hammer.
00:43:12.660 But that
00:43:13.000 doesn't mean
00:43:13.400 mashed potatoes
00:43:14.120 are a
00:43:14.560 failure.
00:43:15.860 Does it?
00:43:17.120 Sometimes
00:43:17.620 mashed potatoes
00:43:18.380 are for
00:43:18.800 eating,
00:43:19.820 although maybe
00:43:20.680 not the best
00:43:21.320 thing for
00:43:21.660 you.
00:43:22.540 And a
00:43:23.540 hammer is
00:43:23.940 for hammering.
00:43:24.960 And so if
00:43:25.460 you've somehow
00:43:25.940 managed to put
00:43:26.740 mashed potatoes
00:43:27.480 and a nail 0.95
00:43:28.000 together,
00:43:29.560 what, did
00:43:30.120 the nail
00:43:30.560 fail?
00:43:31.460 Or did
00:43:32.080 the mashed
00:43:32.440 potatoes
00:43:32.860 fail?
00:43:34.560 Neither.
00:43:36.120 Neither.
00:43:37.700 Sometimes
00:43:38.260 people change
00:43:39.220 or a
00:43:40.340 situation
00:43:40.740 changes and
00:43:42.020 then things
00:43:42.740 don't work.
00:43:44.100 Do you
00:43:44.400 know that
00:43:44.700 every
00:43:44.960 relationship
00:43:45.520 is going
00:43:45.940 to end,
00:43:46.720 right?
00:43:47.020 One of you
00:43:48.020 is going
00:43:48.320 to die.
00:43:50.380 I was
00:43:50.960 trying to
00:43:51.300 think the
00:43:51.680 other day,
00:43:52.220 what would
00:43:52.600 be worse
00:43:53.160 to have a
00:43:54.740 series of
00:43:55.400 10-year
00:43:56.060 relationships
00:43:56.900 and all of
00:43:58.740 them come to
00:43:59.240 some kind of
00:43:59.720 end that you
00:44:00.480 didn't see
00:44:01.240 coming?
00:44:02.540 Or a
00:44:03.640 70-year
00:44:04.240 relationship and
00:44:05.160 then your
00:44:06.440 spouse goes
00:44:07.140 first?
00:44:07.580 imagine that.
00:44:11.160 One 70-year
00:44:12.560 relationship and
00:44:13.320 your spouse
00:44:13.800 dies first?
00:44:15.300 I can't even
00:44:16.280 fathom it.
00:44:18.340 A 10-year
00:44:18.900 relationship
00:44:19.640 that ends,
00:44:22.160 you know,
00:44:22.460 that'll tear you
00:44:23.140 apart for a
00:44:23.700 while.
00:44:24.460 But I can't
00:44:24.960 even imagine
00:44:25.540 the 70-year
00:44:26.220 one.
00:44:26.740 So when I
00:44:27.200 think to
00:44:27.460 myself,
00:44:27.840 which one of
00:44:28.240 those is the
00:44:28.740 better deal?
00:44:29.920 I'm not
00:44:30.580 entirely sure.
00:44:32.440 I don't
00:44:32.740 know.
00:44:32.880 If you
00:44:34.520 had, you
00:44:35.180 know,
00:44:35.860 several long,
00:44:37.080 longish-term
00:44:37.960 relationships that
00:44:38.860 were all
00:44:39.180 individually
00:44:39.780 awesome for
00:44:40.460 different reasons,
00:44:43.300 maybe that
00:44:44.320 was for you.
00:44:48.020 I also think
00:44:49.160 there's a whole
00:44:49.920 bunch of
00:44:50.280 different alternative
00:44:51.240 lifestyle things
00:44:52.220 going on that
00:44:53.880 if you haven't
00:44:55.620 talked to
00:44:57.660 anybody who's
00:44:58.180 involved,
00:44:59.520 you have no
00:45:00.120 idea how
00:45:01.460 many alternative
00:45:02.240 lifestyles are
00:45:03.120 out there.
00:45:04.560 And by
00:45:04.920 alternative,
00:45:05.540 I mean it's
00:45:06.640 not one person
00:45:07.420 dating one
00:45:07.980 person or
00:45:08.540 married to
00:45:08.960 one person.
00:45:11.340 All the
00:45:12.260 different models
00:45:12.980 of how people
00:45:14.080 relate,
00:45:14.920 they're all
00:45:15.600 more popular
00:45:16.580 as far as I
00:45:17.240 can tell.
00:45:18.260 All the
00:45:18.800 things that
00:45:19.160 people don't
00:45:19.520 talk about,
00:45:20.200 there's just
00:45:20.600 more of it,
00:45:21.420 a lot more
00:45:22.020 of it.
00:45:25.340 There is no
00:45:26.300 one right
00:45:26.920 way.
00:45:31.020 Now we
00:45:31.680 get to
00:45:31.980 the bottom
00:45:32.440 of it.
00:45:36.760 Sometimes I
00:45:37.560 have trolls
00:45:38.180 whose name
00:45:41.020 that they
00:45:41.520 pick for
00:45:41.880 social media
00:45:42.460 has something
00:45:43.680 to do with
00:45:44.160 trolling me.
00:45:44.960 Like they've
00:45:45.460 even picked a
00:45:46.080 name that's
00:45:47.280 specific to
00:45:47.980 trolling me.
00:45:48.640 you know,
00:45:53.580 so this is
00:45:54.320 one of the
00:45:54.800 downsides of
00:45:56.560 being in the
00:45:57.460 public eye,
00:45:58.580 I guess,
00:45:59.520 is the
00:46:01.400 people who
00:46:01.880 just make it
00:46:03.400 their hobby
00:46:03.940 to try to
00:46:04.500 hurt you. 0.82
00:46:05.960 Like there's
00:46:06.520 somebody here
00:46:07.060 who took time
00:46:07.720 out of their
00:46:08.100 day to think,
00:46:08.800 okay, how
00:46:10.080 could I hurt
00:46:10.580 this Scott
00:46:11.400 Adams guy?
00:46:12.520 I'll make a
00:46:13.180 fake account
00:46:14.020 and I'll
00:46:15.460 just stalk
00:46:16.660 all of his
00:46:17.280 social media
00:46:18.140 and say
00:46:19.480 stuff that
00:46:21.020 will try to
00:46:21.860 bother him
00:46:22.380 in some way.
00:46:23.440 And I'm
00:46:23.660 thinking to
00:46:24.060 myself,
00:46:25.280 there wasn't
00:46:26.600 anything else
00:46:27.340 you had to
00:46:27.720 do that was
00:46:28.100 better than
00:46:28.480 that?
00:46:30.000 Anything?
00:46:31.480 Of all the
00:46:32.240 things you
00:46:32.580 had to do,
00:46:34.180 that's the
00:46:34.680 one that
00:46:35.000 went ping
00:46:35.860 right to the
00:46:36.400 top of the
00:46:36.820 list.
00:46:38.580 Because I
00:46:39.120 wonder if I
00:46:39.560 looked at you,
00:46:40.100 would you look
00:46:40.500 like your
00:46:41.360 physical fitness
00:46:42.580 was right on
00:46:43.240 point?
00:46:45.940 Basically,
00:46:46.600 you're taking
00:46:47.080 care of all
00:46:47.760 of your needs.
00:46:49.480 I'm sure your
00:46:50.260 career is just
00:46:51.100 going great.
00:46:52.960 Probably your
00:46:53.540 social life is
00:46:54.260 good.
00:46:54.880 Because if
00:46:55.280 there's one
00:46:55.680 thing we can
00:46:56.200 tell about
00:46:56.760 somebody who
00:46:57.800 makes an
00:46:58.800 account just
00:47:00.040 to troll me,
00:47:01.820 one thing you
00:47:02.400 can know about
00:47:02.900 that person,
00:47:04.360 they've got a
00:47:04.900 great personal
00:47:05.560 life, huh?
00:47:06.620 Am I right?
00:47:07.900 That's somebody
00:47:08.680 who's got so
00:47:09.260 many friends,
00:47:10.420 they barely have
00:47:11.220 time for anything
00:47:11.920 extra.
00:47:12.580 so when I
00:47:16.880 see somebody
00:47:17.380 put that much
00:47:18.020 effort into
00:47:18.740 trying to make
00:47:19.460 me sad,
00:47:20.780 I think to
00:47:21.580 myself,
00:47:22.260 I feel like
00:47:23.540 I'm winning
00:47:24.000 this.
00:47:26.300 Because I
00:47:26.920 didn't put any
00:47:27.560 effort into
00:47:28.020 making you
00:47:28.560 sad, well
00:47:29.160 maybe now I
00:47:29.920 guess, but I
00:47:31.380 do it in the
00:47:31.940 spirit of
00:47:32.740 entertainment.
00:47:34.880 Finish him. 0.96
00:47:35.860 I'm not sure
00:47:44.580 I'm interpreting
00:47:45.260 that comment 0.92
00:47:45.840 right, but
00:47:46.720 the way I
00:47:47.160 interpret it
00:47:47.720 made me laugh
00:47:49.980 anyway.
00:47:52.740 Oh my
00:47:53.820 goodness.
00:47:57.520 Yeah, we're
00:47:58.160 not going to
00:47:58.540 talk about the
00:47:59.340 bad stuff in the
00:48:00.520 news today.
00:48:01.180 we're taking
00:48:02.020 a day off.
00:48:06.620 How do I
00:48:07.440 not let the
00:48:08.120 negativity on
00:48:08.920 Twitter affect
00:48:10.060 me?
00:48:11.480 Well, it's a
00:48:13.300 good question and
00:48:14.040 the answer goes
00:48:14.700 like this.
00:48:15.260 Number one,
00:48:17.340 Twitter is part
00:48:17.980 of my job.
00:48:20.160 I don't know
00:48:20.840 how you would
00:48:21.420 do it.
00:48:22.520 If you were
00:48:23.160 using Twitter
00:48:23.760 entirely for
00:48:24.600 entertainment,
00:48:26.040 I don't know
00:48:26.640 why you'd do
00:48:27.060 that.
00:48:28.100 Really, I
00:48:28.640 don't know
00:48:28.960 why.
00:48:30.420 But for
00:48:31.060 people like
00:48:31.540 me, you
00:48:33.580 need to have
00:48:33.960 a social media
00:48:34.640 presence in
00:48:35.360 order to sell
00:48:36.060 anything, right?
00:48:36.700 If I want to
00:48:37.200 sell a book,
00:48:38.320 if I want you
00:48:38.860 to remember
00:48:39.400 there's a
00:48:39.860 Dilbert comic
00:48:40.500 out there
00:48:40.920 somewhere,
00:48:42.080 social media
00:48:42.960 is basically
00:48:43.740 how one
00:48:44.280 does that.
00:48:45.500 And then the
00:48:46.360 live streams
00:48:47.000 work sometimes
00:48:49.860 compatibly and
00:48:50.960 sometimes opposite
00:48:52.080 of my
00:48:52.560 intentions.
00:48:55.960 So anyway,
00:48:56.580 when I use
00:48:57.620 Twitter, I
00:48:58.980 feel like even
00:49:00.400 if I'm enjoying
00:49:01.240 it, it's part
00:49:01.860 of my job.
00:49:03.800 So I'm not
00:49:04.500 sure I would
00:49:04.920 watch it every
00:49:05.540 day if it
00:49:06.540 weren't.
00:49:06.840 I probably
00:49:07.180 would look at
00:49:08.460 less contentious
00:49:09.440 news sites if
00:49:10.440 I wanted to
00:49:10.920 just catch up
00:49:11.900 on the news.
00:49:13.720 But, so the
00:49:16.420 first way is I
00:49:17.280 frame it as
00:49:18.120 it's just work.
00:49:19.800 And there's
00:49:20.380 always somebody
00:49:20.840 complaining at
00:49:21.500 work, right?
00:49:23.880 Doesn't it feel
00:49:24.600 different if
00:49:25.740 there's somebody
00:49:26.160 you only know
00:49:27.400 in your
00:49:27.640 personal life
00:49:28.420 and they're
00:49:28.940 complaining about
00:49:29.680 you?
00:49:30.520 Well, that's
00:49:31.020 going to hurt
00:49:31.440 you.
00:49:32.540 But if it's
00:49:33.220 just work,
00:49:34.240 like a customer
00:49:35.940 complained,
00:49:37.540 blah, blah, blah,
00:49:38.300 and you don't
00:49:38.680 even think it's
00:49:39.260 a valid complaint,
00:49:40.200 that doesn't
00:49:40.560 really hit you
00:49:41.340 the same way.
00:49:42.500 So some of it
00:49:43.200 is it's just
00:49:43.640 strangers.
00:49:44.340 Some of it
00:49:44.880 is it's just
00:49:45.300 practice.
00:49:47.060 The more you
00:49:47.820 see yourself
00:49:48.420 insulted,
00:49:50.400 the more it
00:49:51.680 doesn't mean
00:49:52.000 anything.
00:49:52.260 It's just like
00:49:52.980 looking at
00:49:53.420 scenery at some
00:49:54.340 point.
00:49:54.560 And I
00:50:00.360 also get
00:50:01.580 lost sometimes
00:50:02.600 in the
00:50:02.960 technique.
00:50:04.480 I'll look at
00:50:05.040 how somebody's
00:50:05.640 coming after
00:50:06.160 me and I'll
00:50:07.340 judge whether
00:50:08.020 it looks
00:50:08.720 successful,
00:50:09.520 relatively speaking.
00:50:10.860 I'll be like,
00:50:11.340 oh, that was a
00:50:11.860 good approach.
00:50:12.720 I also find
00:50:13.760 myself wondering
00:50:15.020 how organized
00:50:16.680 they are.
00:50:18.180 Because we
00:50:18.880 know they
00:50:19.620 were organized
00:50:20.360 trolls and we
00:50:21.140 know they seem
00:50:21.900 to have
00:50:22.240 disappeared after
00:50:23.100 elections.
00:50:24.500 Who knows
00:50:25.180 if that's a
00:50:25.660 coincidence or
00:50:26.320 not.
00:50:27.280 So I have
00:50:27.980 lots of
00:50:28.340 curiosity about
00:50:29.240 the trolls.
00:50:30.620 And I even
00:50:31.440 actually wonder,
00:50:33.520 what are they
00:50:34.180 thinking?
00:50:35.720 The ones who
00:50:36.840 come in just
00:50:38.420 to be terrible,
00:50:40.080 is it really
00:50:40.900 all about them?
00:50:42.900 Are they having
00:50:43.760 a bad life,
00:50:44.620 a bad day,
00:50:45.540 and they're just
00:50:46.100 taking it down
00:50:46.800 on me because
00:50:47.440 they think they
00:50:47.960 can get away
00:50:48.480 with it?
00:50:49.080 Because they
00:50:49.840 don't know me,
00:50:50.400 I'm not going
00:50:50.740 to fight back
00:50:51.280 or something.
00:50:52.260 So I always
00:50:52.820 wonder what is
00:50:54.000 broken about
00:50:54.900 the troll.
00:50:56.600 So here's the
00:50:57.660 first reframe
00:50:58.660 to help you
00:51:00.140 deal with
00:51:01.260 negative people.
00:51:03.320 There are two
00:51:04.040 kinds of
00:51:04.500 criticisms.
00:51:07.340 There are more,
00:51:08.260 but let's just
00:51:08.740 say there are
00:51:09.120 two.
00:51:10.420 One of the
00:51:11.080 kinds that are
00:51:11.620 valid.
00:51:13.420 Have you ever
00:51:13.840 gotten a
00:51:14.320 criticism that's
00:51:15.100 just valid?
00:51:17.400 Hurts,
00:51:17.940 doesn't it?
00:51:18.300 You hear
00:51:20.940 something bad
00:51:21.540 about yourself
00:51:22.060 and you think,
00:51:22.880 well, that's
00:51:23.400 true.
00:51:24.420 Okay.
00:51:25.640 I've got to
00:51:26.300 be honest.
00:51:27.480 Okay, that's
00:51:27.960 just true.
00:51:31.180 I always
00:51:32.400 take the
00:51:34.060 value out of
00:51:34.820 those.
00:51:35.580 Because the
00:51:36.240 thing that
00:51:36.600 punches you 0.80
00:51:37.120 in the face
00:51:37.760 is also
00:51:39.480 powerful.
00:51:40.680 That's why it
00:51:41.760 punched you
00:51:42.180 in the face.
00:51:43.100 It's powerful.
00:51:44.580 You can use
00:51:45.360 that power to
00:51:46.240 fix that thing.
00:51:46.980 Just use
00:51:48.520 it.
00:51:49.300 So if
00:51:49.600 somebody gives
00:51:50.280 you the
00:51:50.880 worst criticism
00:51:52.600 and you say,
00:51:53.260 that is true,
00:51:54.940 they've excited
00:51:56.260 that thing in
00:51:57.040 you that makes
00:51:57.540 it easier to
00:51:58.160 fix that thing.
00:51:59.360 So I always
00:51:59.960 think, oh,
00:52:00.860 you just gave
00:52:01.380 me a little
00:52:01.700 gift.
00:52:03.040 Because I
00:52:03.680 wouldn't have
00:52:04.160 fixed that
00:52:04.620 thing otherwise.
00:52:05.880 I wouldn't
00:52:06.280 have had enough
00:52:06.980 energy to do
00:52:07.720 it, but boy,
00:52:08.220 did you fix
00:52:08.700 that.
00:52:09.580 You totally
00:52:10.100 fixed my
00:52:10.660 problem.
00:52:11.980 So the first
00:52:12.760 thing I look
00:52:13.160 at is if it's
00:52:13.840 a valid
00:52:14.480 criticism and
00:52:16.180 I can fix
00:52:17.020 it, that
00:52:18.260 it was a
00:52:18.620 gift.
00:52:20.340 And I've
00:52:20.760 told you
00:52:21.040 before that
00:52:21.480 I actually
00:52:21.860 hear, cha-ching,
00:52:23.940 when I get
00:52:24.560 valid criticism,
00:52:26.500 something I can
00:52:27.160 actually fix.
00:52:28.220 I actually
00:52:28.980 hear like a
00:52:29.640 cash register.
00:52:30.960 Cha-ching, 1.00
00:52:31.580 cha-ching. 0.99
00:52:32.720 And I
00:52:33.040 actually will
00:52:33.920 replay that in
00:52:34.680 my head, like
00:52:35.760 as a little
00:52:36.140 reminder that
00:52:37.380 every time
00:52:37.780 somebody tells
00:52:38.620 me something I
00:52:39.280 can fix,
00:52:41.040 it's just
00:52:42.880 money in the
00:52:43.340 bag.
00:52:43.940 Why wouldn't
00:52:44.400 I fix it?
00:52:45.460 Thank you.
00:52:46.720 Now the
00:52:47.080 other kind is
00:52:47.640 the kind of
00:52:48.220 criticism that's
00:52:49.020 invalid.
00:52:51.160 Usually they're
00:52:52.020 misinterpreting you,
00:52:53.720 they read something
00:52:55.240 wrong, they're just
00:52:56.140 being bad people.
00:52:58.860 And those kind,
00:53:00.800 I just say,
00:53:01.760 these are just
00:53:02.240 strangers.
00:53:04.140 These are just
00:53:04.820 people with
00:53:05.420 chemical reactions
00:53:06.380 inside their
00:53:07.000 skulls.
00:53:08.320 I'm seeing the
00:53:09.220 output of it,
00:53:10.500 but I'm not sure
00:53:11.120 it has much to
00:53:11.680 do with me.
00:53:12.180 Now the
00:53:13.720 valid
00:53:14.100 criticisms,
00:53:14.800 they have to
00:53:15.360 do with me.
00:53:16.840 The invalid 0.97
00:53:17.880 ones have
00:53:18.540 something to
00:53:19.000 do with some
00:53:19.500 other person I
00:53:20.140 don't know.
00:53:21.320 There's a
00:53:21.660 person online,
00:53:22.820 they think
00:53:23.860 something's true
00:53:24.580 that's not
00:53:25.120 true, and
00:53:26.180 they're mad at
00:53:27.120 me because of
00:53:27.920 it.
00:53:28.820 Well, it's
00:53:29.320 hard for me to
00:53:30.140 really take it
00:53:31.500 personally when
00:53:32.960 it's literally
00:53:33.800 not about me.
00:53:35.440 Because the
00:53:36.140 thing they're
00:53:36.500 complaining about
00:53:37.200 generally is
00:53:37.760 some imagined
00:53:38.760 thing, you
00:53:40.000 know, out of
00:53:40.440 context.
00:53:40.920 So that's
00:53:42.380 not something
00:53:42.800 I did, it's
00:53:44.020 something imagined.
00:53:45.800 And then it's
00:53:47.300 a person I
00:53:47.860 don't know, so
00:53:50.160 how much should
00:53:50.660 that bother me?
00:53:52.260 So it's a
00:53:53.140 person I don't
00:53:53.840 know imagining
00:53:54.960 something that
00:53:55.700 didn't happen and
00:53:57.460 then flailing out
00:53:58.560 because they're
00:53:59.160 broken.
00:54:00.360 Because usually
00:54:01.220 there's something
00:54:01.740 wrong with the
00:54:02.280 critic, right?
00:54:03.160 They're broken in
00:54:04.500 some way.
00:54:05.680 So watching a
00:54:06.700 stranger flail at
00:54:09.000 the imaginary,
00:54:10.620 because they're
00:54:11.400 broken, is
00:54:13.740 easy not to
00:54:14.580 be affected by
00:54:15.460 it.
00:54:16.560 You just have
00:54:17.320 to see it that
00:54:17.880 way.
00:54:18.220 So that's a
00:54:18.640 reframe, right?
00:54:20.260 It's just taking
00:54:20.900 the standard
00:54:21.620 thing you're
00:54:22.080 already seeing
00:54:22.600 and just
00:54:22.920 reframing it.
00:54:24.100 Now suppose
00:54:24.900 it's somebody
00:54:27.100 you know who
00:54:28.860 is imagining
00:54:30.040 something and
00:54:30.840 now it's
00:54:31.420 actually a real
00:54:32.060 problem in your
00:54:32.720 real life.
00:54:33.520 Because the
00:54:34.340 imaginary stuff
00:54:35.200 can enter your
00:54:35.880 real life.
00:54:36.480 and it
00:54:37.300 happens all
00:54:37.760 the time
00:54:38.060 with me.
00:54:39.200 Because if
00:54:39.600 you looked at
00:54:40.160 people's, I
00:54:41.540 don't know if
00:54:41.800 you've ever
00:54:42.140 done this, if
00:54:43.160 you've looked at
00:54:43.600 people's
00:54:44.120 criticisms of
00:54:45.200 me online,
00:54:47.140 none of them
00:54:49.040 are true.
00:54:50.900 Actually none
00:54:51.660 of them.
00:54:52.580 Literally none
00:54:53.300 of them.
00:54:54.620 They're all based 1.00
00:54:55.460 on something out
00:54:56.040 of context.
00:54:57.300 That if you knew
00:54:58.060 the real context
00:54:58.880 you'd say, oh,
00:55:00.300 that wasn't so
00:55:01.260 bad.
00:55:01.520 So, I
00:55:07.900 don't know if
00:55:08.180 I answered
00:55:08.540 anybody's
00:55:09.080 question there.
00:55:15.180 Why no
00:55:15.920 man cave last
00:55:16.800 night?
00:55:18.160 Sometimes I
00:55:18.960 have other
00:55:19.280 things to do.
00:55:21.100 But I
00:55:21.740 like coming
00:55:22.720 to you from
00:55:23.200 the man cave.
00:55:23.780 I do that
00:55:24.180 only for the
00:55:24.680 locals,
00:55:25.840 subscribers.
00:55:29.880 Did that
00:55:30.460 help?
00:55:32.320 Was anybody
00:55:33.120 helped by my
00:55:34.240 description of
00:55:35.100 why the
00:55:35.440 critics are
00:55:36.760 irrelevant?
00:55:38.160 Chemical
00:55:38.600 reactions in
00:55:39.860 the brain of
00:55:40.320 a stranger over
00:55:41.880 something imaginary
00:55:42.960 that has
00:55:45.020 something to do
00:55:45.660 with them being
00:55:46.660 broken.
00:55:48.180 That's what it
00:55:48.940 is.
00:55:49.620 It's just not
00:55:50.200 about you.
00:55:51.620 You should
00:55:52.080 care about
00:55:52.880 things that
00:55:53.240 are about
00:55:53.500 you.
00:55:54.760 Because there's
00:55:55.440 plenty about
00:55:56.000 you.
00:55:57.140 I'm sure you've
00:55:57.860 got lots to
00:55:58.360 work on.
00:55:59.140 But you
00:55:59.360 shouldn't care
00:55:59.780 about somebody
00:56:00.300 imagining
00:56:00.860 something.
00:56:01.520 So here's
00:56:07.820 a perfect
00:56:10.200 example.
00:56:11.680 So here's
00:56:12.060 the sort of
00:56:12.400 thing I get.
00:56:12.920 So George
00:56:13.560 Siegel over
00:56:14.820 on YouTube
00:56:15.420 says the
00:56:16.240 following about
00:56:16.780 me.
00:56:17.620 Scott's always
00:56:18.320 right and
00:56:18.780 everyone else
00:56:19.320 is just not
00:56:19.960 smart enough
00:56:20.460 to understand
00:56:21.160 like the
00:56:22.040 vaccines and
00:56:22.800 masks.
00:56:23.800 Sheep.
00:56:24.120 should I be
00:56:28.800 concerned about
00:56:30.500 that criticism?
00:56:32.800 So that's
00:56:33.200 somebody who
00:56:33.640 says I
00:56:34.720 believe I'm
00:56:35.240 always right
00:56:35.880 but I
00:56:37.500 happen to
00:56:37.980 know the
00:56:38.300 context which
00:56:39.180 I often say
00:56:39.960 I'm wrong.
00:56:40.380 So it's
00:56:42.400 imaginary.
00:56:43.860 That's literally
00:56:44.480 based on
00:56:45.020 imagination that
00:56:46.040 I always think
00:56:46.660 I'm right.
00:56:47.060 and also
00:56:48.700 almost certainly
00:56:50.200 has an
00:56:51.120 imaginary
00:56:51.760 false memory
00:56:53.400 of what I
00:56:54.680 said about
00:56:55.140 masks or
00:56:55.820 vaccines.
00:56:56.400 I guarantee
00:56:56.860 that part.
00:56:57.780 That part's
00:56:58.220 guaranteed.
00:56:59.220 Now should I
00:56:59.780 be concerned
00:57:00.320 about George's
00:57:01.200 criticism
00:57:01.840 when I know
00:57:03.820 I don't know
00:57:04.420 George.
00:57:05.220 He's a
00:57:05.620 stranger.
00:57:05.940 what he's
00:57:09.040 criticizing me
00:57:09.900 for is
00:57:10.240 literally
00:57:10.640 imaginary.
00:57:13.700 And there's
00:57:14.380 something wrong
00:57:14.940 with him.
00:57:16.380 I don't know
00:57:17.160 what.
00:57:18.040 But the fact
00:57:18.680 that he felt
00:57:19.500 the need to
00:57:20.260 make that
00:57:21.000 comment.
00:57:22.020 Yeah maybe
00:57:22.420 he's just a
00:57:22.960 troll or
00:57:23.400 something.
00:57:24.000 So maybe
00:57:24.400 there's nothing
00:57:24.800 wrong with
00:57:25.240 him except
00:57:25.640 that he likes
00:57:26.520 being a
00:57:26.900 troll.
00:57:27.780 I would argue
00:57:28.660 that is
00:57:29.120 something wrong
00:57:29.680 with you.
00:57:30.860 But how is
00:57:31.380 that about
00:57:31.760 me?
00:57:33.200 Like where
00:57:33.600 like how did
00:57:34.720 I'm not even
00:57:35.480 involved.
00:57:36.680 It's literally
00:57:37.260 imaginary.
00:57:41.760 It diminishes
00:57:42.760 the value of
00:57:43.540 your brand
00:57:44.200 when you have
00:57:44.780 to watch
00:57:45.300 the trolling.
00:57:47.960 Don't know
00:57:48.600 what that
00:57:48.860 means.
00:58:02.540 Oh George
00:58:03.300 says he's a
00:58:04.060 fun troll.
00:58:04.800 He's just
00:58:05.100 trying to get
00:58:05.460 reactions.
00:58:07.780 Scott can
00:58:08.540 you choose
00:58:08.980 who to
00:58:09.280 fall in
00:58:09.680 love with?
00:58:10.800 Yes.
00:58:13.020 Yes you
00:58:13.660 can.
00:58:16.520 Does anybody
00:58:17.240 believe that?
00:58:19.900 You can do
00:58:21.140 it indirectly.
00:58:22.600 In the same
00:58:23.100 way you can
00:58:23.500 control luck.
00:58:25.840 You can't
00:58:26.640 control luck
00:58:27.220 directly but
00:58:28.960 you can go
00:58:29.560 somewhere where
00:58:30.140 there's going
00:58:30.520 to be more
00:58:30.980 of it.
00:58:32.380 So you can't
00:58:33.240 necessarily
00:58:33.700 control exactly
00:58:35.280 who you
00:58:35.620 fall in
00:58:35.980 love with
00:58:36.380 but you
00:58:37.280 could go
00:58:37.760 where there's
00:58:38.280 a certain
00:58:38.580 type of
00:58:39.020 person.
00:58:40.840 So if you
00:58:41.600 went to
00:58:42.480 college
00:58:42.900 there's a
00:58:44.560 pretty good
00:58:44.940 chance you'd
00:58:45.420 fall in love
00:58:45.880 with somebody
00:58:46.320 who's a
00:58:46.860 college student.
00:58:49.240 So if you
00:58:49.680 wanted to have a
00:58:50.480 relationship with a
00:58:51.440 college educated
00:58:52.720 person
00:58:53.180 would that be
00:58:55.460 luck or
00:58:56.120 something you
00:58:56.640 managed?
00:58:56.920 So you can
00:58:57.720 certainly manage
00:58:58.520 down to a
00:59:01.320 type but
00:59:02.640 then there's
00:59:03.700 a little bit
00:59:04.080 of luck
00:59:04.340 involved of
00:59:04.860 course.
00:59:06.580 And then you
00:59:06.980 can also
00:59:07.580 know when
00:59:08.240 to say
00:59:08.540 no.
00:59:09.960 So you
00:59:10.360 could fall
00:59:10.780 in love
00:59:11.080 with the
00:59:11.340 wrong person
00:59:12.000 but be
00:59:13.580 smart enough
00:59:14.160 to know
00:59:14.520 it happened.
00:59:15.440 You know
00:59:15.600 what I mean?
00:59:16.700 And back
00:59:17.640 out when
00:59:18.060 it's time.
00:59:19.660 Back out
00:59:20.260 early enough.
00:59:25.860 Well I'm
00:59:26.400 glad I could
00:59:26.860 help.
00:59:27.100 Los Angeles.
00:59:36.660 It's easier
00:59:37.540 to fall in
00:59:38.060 love during
00:59:38.520 the mating
00:59:39.020 years you
00:59:39.600 say.
00:59:40.020 Yeah probably.
00:59:41.340 I would
00:59:41.600 imagine that
00:59:42.080 we're built
00:59:42.420 that way.
00:59:43.580 Is there
00:59:44.120 oh the
00:59:45.060 amber turd
00:59:45.760 trial I guess
00:59:46.420 is the
00:59:47.820 jurors are
00:59:49.360 on recess.
00:59:50.960 Can you
00:59:51.160 imagine being
00:59:51.680 one of the
00:59:52.080 jurors in
00:59:52.600 that the
00:59:53.200 amber turd
00:59:55.060 thing?
00:59:55.320 That would
00:59:58.460 be so
00:59:59.320 disgusting.
01:00:00.900 Alright well
01:00:01.640 I think we've
01:00:02.100 done what we
01:00:02.540 need to do
01:00:02.940 today.
01:00:03.720 Today we're
01:00:05.420 going to go
01:00:05.860 and have an
01:00:06.680 amazing day
01:00:07.320 and somehow
01:00:10.100 I made this
01:00:10.960 last an hour.
01:00:12.600 I know.
01:00:13.360 I'm surprised
01:00:13.920 too.
01:00:14.760 But I enjoy
01:00:15.580 this time that
01:00:16.100 we spend
01:00:16.420 together.
01:00:16.880 There may be
01:00:17.340 more news
01:00:18.200 that is not
01:00:18.900 the tragic
01:00:19.920 kind.
01:00:20.800 I'm hoping
01:00:21.180 I'm guessing
01:00:22.740 the next two
01:00:23.380 days will not
01:00:24.240 be filled
01:00:24.760 with news.
01:00:25.320 So we'll
01:00:26.380 do the
01:00:26.600 best we
01:00:26.940 can.
01:00:27.760 I'll see
01:00:28.120 you tomorrow.
01:00:29.100 Bye for
01:00:29.580 now.