Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 31, 2022


Episode 1760 Scott Adams: Come Diagnose My Opinions As COVID-Addled Or Brilliant. I Need Help


Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

144.53938

Word count

7,962

Sentence count

638

Harmful content

Misogyny

10

sentences flagged

Hate speech

16

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

This will not be a normal live stream, no, today you are the judge to see if my brain fog has lifted yet. You will be the judge because you know who can t tell? Me. You, the judge! You will produce my usual superb analysis and clearly demonstrate that my brain is working at 100% or will it be lacking a little bit?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Oh, good morning, everybody, and welcome to either the best show in the history of civilization
00:00:10.000 or an embarrassing COVID-addled brain demonstration that will haunt me for the rest of my life.
00:00:18.820 It's going to be one of those two things, and you, ladies and gentlemen, and everything
00:00:23.240 in between, you are the judges and the juries for this presentation.
00:00:27.800 This will not be a normal live stream, no.
00:00:32.460 Today, you are the judge to see if my brain fog from my COVID has lifted yet.
00:00:39.660 You will be the judge because you know who can't tell?
00:00:42.940 Me.
00:00:44.280 So will I produce my usual superb analysis and clearly demonstrate that my brain is working
00:00:52.160 at 100%, or will it be lacking a little bit?
00:00:55.920 Those of you who have watched me a little while, you be the judge.
00:01:00.580 Today will be the test.
00:01:02.480 Now, if you'd like to get this off to a good start, I know you do, all you do is a cup
00:01:06.920 or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice, a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of
00:01:10.180 any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:01:13.040 I like coffee.
00:01:15.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:01:19.640 The dopamine to the day thing makes everything better.
00:01:24.120 It's called the simultaneous sip, and you're about to enjoy it.
00:01:27.440 Go.
00:01:27.600 Ah, yes.
00:01:36.600 Well, catching you up, if you did not know, I tested positive for COVID on Saturday.
00:01:43.620 Today is Tuesday, and I thought I'd give you an update.
00:01:46.780 And so, just before I came on here, I took another test to see if I still have the COVID.
00:01:57.000 Does anybody want to look at this test and tell me the answer?
00:02:00.600 Because I couldn't see it from where it was laying there.
00:02:04.180 All right.
00:02:05.240 Somebody?
00:02:05.980 I'm going to show it to the locals people first.
00:02:08.840 All right, locals.
00:02:09.420 Oh, yeah, that's not just COVID.
00:02:20.780 That line is so strong, it's like super COVID.
00:02:25.100 I believe I have now passed into some kind of ultra COVID situation.
00:02:31.280 You know, ultra MAGA was impressive, but ultra COVID, boom, that's what I got.
00:02:39.660 Stay away.
00:02:40.640 Stay away.
00:02:41.800 Stay away.
00:02:43.120 Now, when I want to not spend time around people, instead of making excuses, like, oh, I have to work, or, you know, whatever.
00:02:52.920 I'll just take this out.
00:02:54.060 This will be like a cross that gets rid of vampires.
00:02:56.260 Back off.
00:03:01.360 Back off.
00:03:02.580 20 feet.
00:03:03.380 20 feet.
00:03:04.360 20 feet.
00:03:04.940 20 feet.
00:03:05.820 So I think this will keep me lonely for a while.
00:03:13.660 But let me give you the update on the symptoms.
00:03:17.660 So first day, Saturday, horrible.
00:03:20.020 Second day, I would say the symptoms were gone 70% by the second day.
00:03:25.700 But 30% of that was still pretty rough, right?
00:03:30.700 It was still 30% of something that sucked.
00:03:34.160 So day two wasn't too fun.
00:03:36.860 Day three, it looked like it was another 70% or so.
00:03:41.280 And here was my experience.
00:03:42.940 I had a sudden, almost unnatural recovery that happened within a few hours.
00:03:53.680 Now, isn't that weird?
00:03:56.680 So what drug did I take, or what medicine or medicines did I take, that caused me to go from really, you know, head foggy, tired, couldn't move, basically.
00:04:10.420 And then suddenly, boom, I didn't have any symptoms at all that I could identify.
00:04:19.760 What was it?
00:04:21.840 Here's the answer.
00:04:24.320 Apparently, it just does that.
00:04:27.880 Here's everything you need to know about everything you've ever heard about what works and what doesn't work with COVID.
00:04:35.980 I don't think it matters what you do.
00:04:37.760 I didn't do anything that should have made a difference.
00:04:41.180 I took Tylenol, right?
00:04:44.200 Smoked weed, drank coffee, which I do every day.
00:04:48.500 So remember I told you that when I first contracted it, it was obvious it was COVID.
00:04:56.180 I mean, if anybody had been paying attention, it was obvious.
00:05:00.200 And part of why it was obvious is that I'd never felt anything like it.
00:05:03.400 It just didn't feel like a normal illness at all, because it affected my brain.
00:05:09.900 I've never had that before.
00:05:11.520 Have you?
00:05:12.520 Any kind of illness that directly affected your cognition?
00:05:16.520 And it was pretty bad.
00:05:18.180 There were simple things that I couldn't figure out.
00:05:20.740 You should have seen me try to send a text message.
00:05:23.900 There was a period when it was sort of peaking in intensity.
00:05:28.840 When I would type a text message and I would look at it, it would literally just be random letters.
00:05:36.000 They weren't even close to words.
00:05:38.080 They weren't even close.
00:05:39.000 And I'd look at it and say, oh, I guess I had been like one over or something.
00:05:44.660 Sometimes your keyboard hand is like one letter over.
00:05:47.940 So I'd type it again, paying more attention.
00:05:50.600 And I'd look at it again and be like, still not even close to words.
00:05:55.460 You wouldn't even know what word I was intending.
00:05:58.280 I was trying to do searches on Google.
00:06:01.880 But fortunately, Google knows how to translate your misspellings to real words.
00:06:06.440 I think every word I tried to spell was misspelled.
00:06:10.840 Like a lot.
00:06:13.300 The cognitive part was pretty intense.
00:06:17.540 But here's my bottom line.
00:06:19.500 Everybody who took anything on the third day
00:06:23.900 believes that they had a miraculous recovery because of what they did on the third day.
00:06:30.840 Because I didn't do anything.
00:06:32.240 And I had a miraculous recovery that didn't look natural.
00:06:36.440 The fact that all of my symptoms went away within just a few hours,
00:06:40.740 instead of sort of gradually wearing off, nothing like that happened.
00:06:46.000 The body ache and the symptoms came on within one hour when I got it.
00:06:54.360 And when they left, it felt like they left in an hour.
00:06:58.480 Now, nothing about that feels natural.
00:07:02.060 Nothing.
00:07:03.140 I'm not saying that means it was an engineered virus.
00:07:06.480 But I've never felt anything that came on that fast or left that quickly after two and a half days.
00:07:13.640 So now, imagine if I had successfully gotten the Paxlovid drug
00:07:18.780 that I had initially thought about but was too mentally incompetent to make it happen.
00:07:23.860 Later, I changed my mind and decided I'd be better off writing it out.
00:07:29.240 But imagine if I'd gotten it.
00:07:31.840 I would have gotten it and taken it just hours before all of my symptoms went away on their own.
00:07:39.900 Miraculously.
00:07:40.920 What would I have concluded?
00:07:43.160 Would I have recommended to you that you take Paxlovid?
00:07:46.060 What? I would. I would.
00:07:48.580 Because if I felt that bad for two and a half days,
00:07:51.900 and within hours of taking a particular drug, I felt completely better,
00:07:56.960 you don't think I would recommend you take that drug?
00:08:00.280 And I would be completely wrong.
00:08:03.600 I mean, maybe it is a good drug.
00:08:05.000 I don't know. I'm not a doctor.
00:08:06.520 Don't take my advice.
00:08:08.420 Whatever you do.
00:08:09.080 By the way, yeah, let me stop here.
00:08:11.100 Make sure you're not taking any medical advice from this.
00:08:14.140 There's nothing like that happening here.
00:08:16.060 What I'm trying to tell you is that anything you heard about ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine,
00:08:21.340 Paxlovid, remdesivir, you name it.
00:08:25.160 Anything you heard where somebody's symptoms, you know, very quickly turned around,
00:08:31.480 how can you distinguish that from what happened with me?
00:08:36.360 Now, how many of you had a similar situation where you didn't take anything that should have helped
00:08:42.000 and you had a very quick turnaround?
00:08:46.740 Yeah, you see in the comments, in the locals, it's a little faster.
00:08:50.640 Right, you're seeing yeses, right?
00:08:52.420 Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, right.
00:08:54.840 So everything that you heard about something that definitely worked, no way to know.
00:09:01.300 No way to know.
00:09:01.900 All right.
00:09:05.640 And then, of course, today there's an article, of course, about Paxlovid.
00:09:10.340 So that's the pill you take, one of the pills you take if you have symptoms.
00:09:15.360 And it says that you can get a rebound thing and still be contagious after you take it and blah, blah, blah.
00:09:22.000 All right.
00:09:22.420 So there's that.
00:09:25.660 I'm glad I didn't take it.
00:09:26.560 I watched the Norm MacDonald special, the one he recorded just in his house before he passed.
00:09:35.900 And it was disturbing.
00:09:38.440 It was disturbing because you knew he was so close to his death and that he knew it when he was doing it.
00:09:44.880 And he had a number of jokes about death.
00:09:48.940 And I have to admit it was a little jarring.
00:09:51.260 Now, here's a story I've told some of you, you've heard before, and I can tell it because he's passed.
00:09:59.980 But a few years ago, Norm contacted me.
00:10:04.920 And apparently he had followed me to some degree.
00:10:09.160 I don't know.
00:10:09.500 I think he may have read one of my books or something.
00:10:12.000 And I think he might have seen my live streams.
00:10:14.440 So he contacted me on Twitter, I think, and asked if I would take a call.
00:10:20.120 So I did.
00:10:21.260 So I talked to him, and I didn't know that he was dealing with a, you know, terminal cancer.
00:10:28.640 But he asked me about dealing with pain.
00:10:32.760 So apparently he had some kind of ongoing pain that drugs weren't doing the job for, for whatever reason.
00:10:39.260 And he asked me if hypnosis would be a potential solution to that.
00:10:44.100 So I told him what I knew about it, which is some people do get some relief from hypnosis.
00:10:49.200 It kind of depends, right?
00:10:50.940 I'm not going to say it's going to work on every kind of pain and every situation.
00:10:54.600 I don't know that to be true.
00:10:55.940 But you hear enough reports about people, anecdotally, who feel like they handled their pain.
00:11:02.640 So I thought it was worth trying.
00:11:03.900 And so because I had that little bit of encounter with him, and then after the fact I realized how meaningful it was, I mean, I thought it was plenty terrible that he had to deal with this chronic pain.
00:11:17.500 I didn't know how bad it was or that it was part of a terminal situation.
00:11:22.480 So I found it hard to watch, but I recommend it highly because you do see, you know, one of the greatest of all time putting out some material you haven't seen before.
00:11:38.440 And that alone is worth watching.
00:11:41.060 I also watched Ricky Gervais, his new stand-up special that the trans community is getting up in arms for.
00:11:49.260 And it's kind of interesting because he says so directly that these are just jokes and that he says things just for effect.
00:11:57.500 He says that in the act.
00:11:59.540 You know, he pauses and says, you know, I just say this for effect, right?
00:12:02.220 It's just to offend you and make people laugh.
00:12:04.800 I don't mean any of that.
00:12:07.300 And to me, that should be good enough.
00:12:11.280 But the fact is that some things do offend people, just the topic itself.
00:12:16.540 You know, it just feels like you're making it too easy to mock them or something.
00:12:20.840 So I felt that this is one time that Ricky Gervais was trying a little too hard to be Dave Chappelle.
00:12:31.320 I hate to say that, but that's what it felt like.
00:12:36.360 Because remember how impressive it was when Chappelle handled, you know, basically a similar situation.
00:12:45.100 And he did it, you know, wokeness, let's say.
00:12:47.860 Wokeness in particular, not the trans issue.
00:12:50.680 But when Chappelle did his special, it was just sort of a genius.
00:12:54.280 You know, and it showed that somebody could talk about complicated emotional topics and still make it all work.
00:13:02.980 And I felt like Gervais wanted to enter that same space.
00:13:06.560 And I guess he did it successfully.
00:13:09.340 I'd say he did it successfully.
00:13:11.620 You know, he did occupy the space.
00:13:13.920 And he did, got away with it.
00:13:16.140 You know, by his standards.
00:13:17.460 But I felt like it was a little forced, that's all.
00:13:21.920 I felt like he was trying to get into that space more than he was trying to just make us laugh.
00:13:29.280 So it felt like there was a burden on the writing.
00:13:32.120 That's what I felt.
00:13:33.740 It's sort of just a weird writer's take on it.
00:13:37.100 But do I recommend it?
00:13:38.860 Yes.
00:13:39.940 Yes, I recommend it.
00:13:40.980 So in terms of things you could watch that would entertain you, yeah, yeah, you should watch it.
00:13:47.240 Definitely watch it.
00:13:51.400 Here's a hoax update.
00:13:53.880 So Jeffrey Goldberg, who may or may not have ever promoted any hoaxes in his past, tweeted this.
00:14:02.020 He said, a reminder that on Memorial Day 2017, Donald Trump and John Kelly, his chief of staff, visited the Arlington National Cemetery grave of Kelly's son, a fallen Marine officer.
00:14:14.680 Trump turned to Kelly and said, quote, I don't get it.
00:14:18.000 What's in it for them?
00:14:21.000 So that's what Jeffrey Goldberg says happened in 2017.
00:14:24.520 Mark Hemingway countered with a tweet of his own saying, a reminder, more than 20 people with knowledge of what occurred with Trump on this trip went on record to say Goldberg's anonymously sourced story is bunk.
00:14:42.800 Okay.
00:14:44.220 Now, did you believe even for a second that this was true?
00:14:50.200 I mean, just listen to this again.
00:14:51.560 Do you believe that Trump would have stood next to a grave with Kelly and, you know, where his fallen Marine son was and turned to Kelly and said, I don't get it.
00:15:01.520 What's in it for them?
00:15:03.120 Does that even sound a little bit like something he would do?
00:15:06.880 Like, even if you assume the worst things about Trump are true, he's always been respectful to the military.
00:15:13.320 Has anybody been more consistent in being respectful to the military in all the ways that he can figure out how to do it, right?
00:15:24.980 I mean, even if he missed a salute here or there, I don't know, maybe he did.
00:15:29.620 But clearly his intentions have been so consistent for years and years.
00:15:35.840 I mean, so it's just a ridiculous hoax.
00:15:38.280 And I can't believe anybody tried to promote that one.
00:15:40.560 But somebody will believe anything.
00:15:43.740 All right.
00:15:43.940 When I put out my hoax quiz, they had 10 popular hoaxes on it.
00:15:49.480 And I invited you to borrow it so you could share it with people who tried to argue with you online.
00:15:55.280 But if they believe any of those 10 hoaxes, you can say to yourself, I'm not dealing with a clever person here.
00:16:02.200 And that might be useful.
00:16:03.260 But I was one-upped by a user who said, 10, here's my list of, I don't know, 25 or 30 hoaxes.
00:16:13.120 What would be better?
00:16:14.620 What is more persuasive?
00:16:16.540 10 hoaxes or let's say 30?
00:16:19.460 If I were trying to convince you, let's say a Democrat, that the Democrat side was doing a lot of hoaxing and that it makes a big difference in how they see the world, would I be more convincing with 30 or with 10?
00:16:36.860 The answer is probably 10.
00:16:42.120 Now, I say probably because I think you'd have to do like a proper scientific study to know which really makes a difference.
00:16:48.840 Could be that the bigger number influences people.
00:16:51.980 But I don't think so.
00:16:53.800 And here's why.
00:16:55.280 If you only do 10, you can make sure that you pick the 10 that are the strongest cases.
00:17:00.560 If you pick 30, you will necessarily have things that are weaker than whatever your best 10 was, right?
00:17:09.820 So your goal would be to have the most number without getting into any weak ones.
00:17:15.720 Because when I looked at the list of 30, even I said, that's not a hoax.
00:17:21.440 That's marginal.
00:17:22.300 So I'm completely on the side of the hoaxes being hoaxes, but even I didn't believe the list of 30.
00:17:31.460 You get that?
00:17:32.760 Like I'm completely primed to believe that the Democrats are hoaxing everything.
00:17:37.840 You know, I've seen so many of them.
00:17:39.180 But even I couldn't believe the list of 30.
00:17:42.340 The list of 10 is hard enough to believe as it is.
00:17:45.460 And that's actually part of its strength.
00:17:46.980 Because you want people to see that there are like eight things on there that even they know are hoaxes.
00:17:52.580 And then there are two on there that they think were real.
00:17:54.820 And they're like, uh, oh shit.
00:17:58.400 If the other eight are fake, maybe these other two are fake too.
00:18:03.240 So the laundry list persuasion is one you need to guard against when somebody is using it against you.
00:18:09.780 Because if somebody has a list, you just sort of think something on that list must be true.
00:18:14.480 But if you want to be the one who's the persuasive one, then using the laundry list persuasion actually, unfortunately, it works.
00:18:24.460 I'm not sure it's the most ethical thing you could ever do, but it works.
00:18:29.740 Now in this case, it's ethical, in my opinion, because everything on the list is true, as far as I know.
00:18:36.820 And the purpose of promoting it is to make the world smarter and better.
00:18:42.640 So that feels ethical enough to me.
00:18:51.400 Yes, and has somebody said here, if there's one cat that doesn't belong in your house, you might be able to get rid of it.
00:18:58.380 But if there are ten cats, you're going to have to deal with the root cause.
00:19:01.740 You know, there's maybe a root problem here or something.
00:19:03.780 Elon Musk is sort of doubling down on his voting Republican.
00:19:13.540 But he said that he has a reason for why the Democrats may have turned so negative lately.
00:19:23.820 And apparently some of that negativity is hitting him.
00:19:26.180 He says that there was somebody who donated lots of money to political action committees posing as charities,
00:19:40.000 and that all that money is causing a lot of negativity to come into the system.
00:19:45.360 And that the person who donated all that money was Jeff Bezos' ex-wife.
00:19:48.920 Mackenzie Scott is her last name, I guess.
00:19:53.240 And so Musk is, like, directly saying that her money has changed things into a bad thing,
00:20:02.160 and so much so that he's escaping the Democrats.
00:20:05.700 And Musk says that it's true that Tesla was attacked by Romney in two or three presidential debates.
00:20:16.580 But he says those lines were fed to him by a particular individual in the oil and gas industry.
00:20:22.060 So Musk knows a lot about what's behind the curtain.
00:20:24.940 Like, he even knows the person who gave Romney the talking points.
00:20:29.140 So that's pretty far behind the curtain.
00:20:31.060 And he says, given the unprovoked attacks by leading Democrats against me, meaning Musk,
00:20:42.160 and a very cold shoulder to Tesla and SpaceX, I intend to vote Republican in November.
00:20:46.940 I love the fact that he's using his own vote as a public political weapon.
00:20:53.240 Who else could do that?
00:20:56.340 Imagine if I went public and said, I'm going to change my vote.
00:21:00.380 And the entire world would say, so?
00:21:04.880 What's that got to do with me?
00:21:07.180 Go vote any way you want, citizen.
00:21:10.260 But when the richest person in the world says he's going to change his vote and then shows his work,
00:21:15.940 tells you why, you kind of pay attention.
00:21:18.880 I feel like he could move the needle.
00:21:20.940 I mean, I don't know how much, but, like, I know I couldn't or anybody else.
00:21:25.160 But I think he could actually move the needle by saying, if you don't act better, I'll vote for the other team.
00:21:32.400 Now, what is it that Democrat voters get wrong all the time?
00:21:38.580 What Democrat voters get wrong all the time is they'll vote for their team no matter what the team does.
00:21:43.780 I suppose you could argue that Republicans do that, too.
00:21:48.700 But if people are just team voters, we're doomed.
00:21:52.520 So the richest, maybe one of the smartest people in the world, just show Democrats how they can retake power.
00:21:59.400 Stop voting for the people that are screwing you.
00:22:05.120 Do you know how big a lesson that is?
00:22:08.000 Stop voting for the people who are just screwing you?
00:22:11.100 Like, they're screwing you right in front of you. 0.82
00:22:12.940 They're not even pretending they're not screwing you. 0.99
00:22:15.760 I mean, they're screwing Musk, like, right in front of his face. 0.98
00:22:19.600 So why would he vote for them?
00:22:21.780 Now, I love the fact that he's not saying, I love Republicans and I endorse all their policies.
00:22:27.220 He's literally just punishing Democrats for being assholes.
00:22:32.260 Am I right?
00:22:33.880 Which is actually a really useful impulse.
00:22:37.320 Because simply saying stuff doesn't really change things.
00:22:40.080 But he actually changed his vote.
00:22:41.760 And he's willing to change his vote to vote for a team that has policies that I think, just guessing, he hates.
00:22:49.580 I'm just guessing.
00:22:51.100 Because, you know, I don't think he's a conservative.
00:22:53.600 So don't you think there are some conservative policies, some Republican policies that he probably hates.
00:22:59.560 But he's still going to vote for them to punish the Democrats.
00:23:04.420 That is really useful.
00:23:06.860 If he taught the whole country to do that, just punish your team if they're obviously just abusing you.
00:23:14.220 I don't know.
00:23:14.680 I think we'd come out ahead, wouldn't we?
00:23:15.980 We'll see.
00:23:19.120 So every time he makes a move, it has like a societal impact that's hard to judge.
00:23:26.480 Good news in indoor farming.
00:23:29.340 Maybe outdoors, too.
00:23:30.600 There's now a really good farm bot.
00:23:33.280 A robot that can plant your seeds and water it.
00:23:37.740 And it can pick the weeds and it can fertilize it exactly the right amount.
00:23:43.560 Basically, every kind of plant will get its own special treatment.
00:23:48.520 And I thought to myself, I believe that there's a 10x improvement in indoor farming that we're going to see in the next few years.
00:23:56.340 And all you need to do is be able to build a cheaper structure, the indoor part.
00:24:05.840 So if we can figure out how to make a durable, easy structure, that would be half of it.
00:24:12.920 Then the robots will get rid of the labor, because they can work all day long and they can do it perfectly.
00:24:19.020 They'll get rid of the fertilizers.
00:24:24.020 Or, no, I'm not sure.
00:24:25.280 They don't get rid of the fertilizers.
00:24:26.880 They get rid of the pesticides.
00:24:29.580 Right?
00:24:30.160 Because there's no bugs.
00:24:31.480 I think the robot could probably even squash a bug.
00:24:34.760 They didn't teach it to do that.
00:24:36.200 Yeah, it's hydroponics, probably.
00:24:38.820 So I think the yields, and they'll also, I think, learn to grow better vertically.
00:24:44.340 Because they don't have the vertical thing down as well as they could.
00:24:47.620 So I think there's going to be better mirrors, better lighting, cheaper electricity, fusion, who knows.
00:24:55.980 But whatever they do, I think there's going to be a 10x improvement in indoor farming.
00:24:59.820 And that will make us a lot safer the next time there's a food shortage.
00:25:04.840 Speaking of food shortage, we have two gigantic problems in the world.
00:25:13.100 One is that wheat looks like it's going to be greatly constrained.
00:25:18.900 So the supply of wheat will be so constrained that poor countries will, are predicted to have starvation.
00:25:28.460 It's a big problem.
00:25:30.320 Second big problem.
00:25:32.100 Obesity in rich countries.
00:25:34.500 Caused by.
00:25:36.400 Caused by.
00:25:37.960 Too much bread.
00:25:38.860 Well, you know, other things too, but too much bread.
00:25:44.280 So if we have rich countries who have too much bread, it's making them unhealthy.
00:25:50.340 And you have poor countries who are going to starve because they don't have enough wheat.
00:25:56.000 Is there no way we can solve two problems at the same time?
00:26:00.400 Okay, I get it.
00:26:01.260 There's a distribution challenge.
00:26:03.300 Sure, I get it.
00:26:04.220 But it's such a big problem, I feel like, you know, you could make those adjustments.
00:26:11.440 I'm taking this personal.
00:26:13.760 I don't mean to take your bread away from you.
00:26:16.720 Now, somebody said, you can't take bread away from, you know, the rich.
00:26:20.460 They will fight to keep it.
00:26:21.660 To which I say, well, if it's not on the shelves, what are they going to be fighting to keep?
00:26:27.820 So I feel as if the biggest category in my supermarket is bread.
00:26:35.200 Bread-related things.
00:26:36.640 I don't think we have a bread shortage.
00:26:38.260 I think we have, like, way too much bread.
00:26:41.580 So maybe the reason that it looks like an emergency, but we're not treating it like one, is that it isn't one.
00:26:50.700 Maybe people just adjust what they eat and everything's fine.
00:26:53.660 I don't know.
00:26:54.280 Maybe.
00:26:55.140 Maybe you just eat more vegetables.
00:26:57.820 But the CEO of Airbnb, Brian Chesky, says that the open office plan for, you know, cubicles or non-cubicles, I should say, is dead.
00:27:11.880 And that the old way of the open floor plan with these meeting rooms that everyone's waiting in line to get in and no one can find a meeting room, all of that is, I think, a thing of the past.
00:27:22.500 So people will be trying to redesign the office of the future, and it might include coming in for a week every quarter to, you know, bond.
00:27:33.920 I don't know.
00:27:35.900 Does it feel like the cubicle is dead?
00:27:37.760 I mean, I tried to kill cubicles for 33 years, but it looks like it took COVID to do it.
00:27:46.500 Now, cubicles will probably always, because they're cheap.
00:27:50.320 As long as they're cheap, they're just still going to be used.
00:27:53.400 There will be some cool high-tech companies that try other things and then give up on them later.
00:27:58.100 It seems to me that Biden, his strategy for Ukraine is now clear.
00:28:05.920 For a while, it was a little murky, but now it's clear.
00:28:09.040 And I would call it the Afghanistan strategy.
00:28:12.080 It's basically the same as the Afghanistan strategy, which you could call losing expensively.
00:28:18.220 Losing expensively.
00:28:20.260 So it's two parts.
00:28:22.040 There's the losing.
00:28:22.920 But there's also spending way too much money to do it.
00:28:28.100 Now, winning would look like winning economically.
00:28:32.780 That's what a good outcome would be.
00:28:35.120 But if you're losing and you're spending way too much money to do it, that's sort of the Afghanistan strategy.
00:28:41.300 So at least we know what he's up to.
00:28:45.500 And I think we can say at this point that...
00:28:52.020 Here's another example of wanting versus deciding.
00:28:55.060 You know how we were trying to decide what is it that Putin really wants with Ukraine?
00:29:00.780 Does he want the whole country or does he want the region he's consolidating now?
00:29:06.320 And it always seemed like both, didn't it?
00:29:08.640 It was like, well, he sort of acted like he wanted the whole country, but maybe that was a fake-out.
00:29:14.360 Maybe he never did.
00:29:15.520 Maybe he just wanted the other stuff.
00:29:16.960 But I think here's a better way to look at it.
00:29:20.000 It's the difference between what you want and what you decide.
00:29:24.960 I believe Putin decided to take over those territories he's taking over right now.
00:29:31.140 Meaning that once he had decided, there was no price he was unwilling to pay.
00:29:35.860 It looks like it.
00:29:37.060 It looks like he would be willing to pay any price to take over those territories.
00:29:42.260 So that looks like a decision.
00:29:43.740 And as I told you before, if he ever decides he wants any part of Ukraine, he's going to have it. 0.99
00:29:50.960 Because he will be able to take however much pain it takes, and then he'll just have it.
00:29:55.220 It looks like that's what he's doing.
00:29:57.760 Any amount of cruelty, any amount of loss of life for Russians, any amount of military degradation,
00:30:04.020 any amount of sanctions, apparently he's just going to do it.
00:30:08.220 But, did he think the same way about all of Ukraine and Kyiv?
00:30:14.060 I don't think so.
00:30:15.740 I think all of Ukraine is something he wanted, but he had not decided on it.
00:30:21.820 And that when it looked like it was hard to get, he said, well, okay.
00:30:26.360 You know, it kept their army pinned down, and so it did his job.
00:30:30.820 We'll just take the part we care about.
00:30:32.180 So I think the wanting versus deciding frame helps analyze that one.
00:30:42.480 Here's the most optimistic, stupid thing you've ever heard in your life.
00:30:47.220 You've got a big problem with national debt, am I right?
00:30:51.200 National debt's through the roof.
00:30:53.460 You'd like to solve that, don't you, wouldn't you?
00:30:55.420 You've got another big problem, inflation.
00:30:59.080 Inflation, gigantic problem.
00:31:00.320 You'd like to solve that, wouldn't you?
00:31:03.080 Do you know what solves national debt?
00:31:09.340 Inflation.
00:31:10.560 You could inflate it away.
00:31:15.000 Now, don't get me started on why that's a bad idea.
00:31:22.100 Yeah, that's the low IQ take.
00:31:24.800 Now, it's both literally true 0.58
00:31:27.120 that probably the only way to get rid of a debt this big
00:31:30.280 is to inflate it away,
00:31:31.340 but you want to do it with, you know, a reasonable level of inflation.
00:31:36.200 You don't want to do it with runaway inflation.
00:31:38.960 That doesn't give you the win you want it.
00:31:41.640 Everybody okay with that?
00:31:43.560 That you want some inflation
00:31:45.400 because we'll probably never be able to pay it down.
00:31:48.660 You want the value of that,
00:31:50.280 those dollars that we borrowed,
00:31:51.720 just to reduce over time
00:31:53.720 because everything inflates,
00:31:55.100 even if it's just 2% to 4% a year.
00:31:58.920 But, you know, if you're up to 8% a year in inflation
00:32:01.440 or something like that,
00:32:02.380 that's a little too fast.
00:32:03.920 A little too fast.
00:32:06.200 All right.
00:32:06.520 Oh, my God.
00:32:10.380 This is the left-wing Robert Rubin nonsense.
00:32:13.580 I just said, don't take it seriously.
00:32:16.480 Is somebody taking it seriously?
00:32:21.680 No, you...
00:32:22.800 I'm pretty sure that you want a small amount of inflation
00:32:25.560 if you ever want to get rid of your debt.
00:32:30.740 But a big amount would be a bad idea.
00:32:32.880 All right.
00:32:34.540 Canadians, it looks like they're proposing this legislation
00:32:37.760 to cap their guns,
00:32:40.420 meaning that you wouldn't be able to buy another handgun
00:32:43.800 or any gun, I guess, if you're a citizen.
00:32:47.960 They can keep the ones they have,
00:32:50.440 but you wouldn't be able to get anything else.
00:32:54.900 You wouldn't be able to import it.
00:32:56.560 You wouldn't be able to get it anywhere else.
00:32:58.700 Now, people are going to say,
00:33:00.240 well, if Canada can do that,
00:33:02.640 why can't the United States? 0.93
00:33:04.760 Does anybody want to answer that question?
00:33:06.780 If Canada can do this,
00:33:08.820 why can't the United States go?
00:33:15.060 Well, let me jump in with my answer
00:33:17.340 while you're giving your answers.
00:33:20.760 Because they live next to the United States.
00:33:23.140 If Canada were ever, let's say,
00:33:27.220 attacked by a tyrant who wanted to occupy the country,
00:33:32.340 it would take 10 minutes for the United States
00:33:35.000 to flow 200 million guns into Canada.
00:33:38.480 They'll never be short of guns.
00:33:41.040 Canada will always have 0.84
00:33:42.480 all the American guns they want to use.
00:33:45.680 Because we're not going to let Canada go under.
00:33:48.820 Have you met us?
00:33:50.360 Canadians, let me talk to you directly.
00:33:51.880 Canadians,
00:33:53.900 you might think that Americans are kind of assholes,
00:33:58.940 kind of assholes sometimes.
00:34:00.140 You're not wrong.
00:34:01.080 You're not wrong.
00:34:02.560 Well, we're kind of bastards.
00:34:04.660 We're kind of bastards sometimes.
00:34:06.840 We're a little selfish.
00:34:08.080 We're cruel.
00:34:09.660 We're bigoted.
00:34:11.020 We're racist.
00:34:12.680 We're sexist.
00:34:14.160 We're a lot of things.
00:34:15.220 Yes, it's all true.
00:34:18.240 But Canadians,
00:34:20.680 if your ass gets in trouble, 0.92
00:34:23.980 call us.
00:34:25.600 Seriously.
00:34:27.340 Call us.
00:34:28.680 We're going to fucking save you.
00:34:30.420 Every time.
00:34:31.680 Every time.
00:34:32.780 Right?
00:34:32.940 So, you don't need guns that much.
00:34:36.720 I mean, at least for that one specific,
00:34:38.740 you know, use.
00:34:39.560 You don't need guns.
00:34:40.760 Now, you might be feeling unarmed
00:34:43.000 against criminals
00:34:44.320 and stuff like that.
00:34:47.540 That's not arrogant.
00:34:49.440 Is it arrogant to say that America
00:34:51.020 would come to the rescue of Canada
00:34:53.160 if that were ever important?
00:34:55.140 No.
00:34:56.040 Because Canada would do the same thing.
00:34:58.680 Can the Canadians imagine
00:35:00.280 any scenario
00:35:01.040 in which the United States
00:35:02.180 was seriously at risk
00:35:03.780 from an outside force
00:35:06.280 and Canada would not mount
00:35:08.600 its maximum military effort
00:35:10.940 to jump into the fight?
00:35:12.140 Of course not.
00:35:13.100 It's just automatic.
00:35:14.820 Right?
00:35:15.340 Canada and the United States
00:35:16.480 are just linked
00:35:17.120 and that's not going to change.
00:35:18.800 We're just linked militarily.
00:35:20.900 So,
00:35:22.040 it's not arrogant to say
00:35:23.300 that if Canada ever got in trouble,
00:35:24.760 the United States
00:35:25.540 would be there in a heartbeat.
00:35:28.040 That's just common sense
00:35:29.320 because it would work both ways.
00:35:32.340 Right?
00:35:33.240 So,
00:35:34.180 anyway.
00:35:40.900 Rasmussen has a poll
00:35:41.900 that says 76% of people,
00:35:44.560 this is the people
00:35:45.580 who very much support it
00:35:47.140 and kind of support it,
00:35:48.520 support some kind of
00:35:49.520 red flag rules for guns,
00:35:51.960 meaning that
00:35:52.780 a citizen could petition
00:35:55.220 the court,
00:35:56.060 I guess,
00:35:56.560 to have someone else's gun
00:35:58.360 taken away
00:35:59.080 if there's evidence
00:36:00.580 that that person
00:36:01.400 is a high-level danger
00:36:04.080 with a gun.
00:36:06.700 76% of the public
00:36:08.140 supports that.
00:36:10.560 Do you?
00:36:12.380 Now,
00:36:13.060 let's take for granted
00:36:15.100 that any law
00:36:16.860 can be abused.
00:36:17.620 So,
00:36:19.480 if you say
00:36:19.960 the reason
00:36:20.360 you don't agree
00:36:21.220 with it
00:36:21.540 is because
00:36:21.940 the law
00:36:22.360 can be abused,
00:36:23.640 that would be a reason
00:36:24.860 to not agree
00:36:25.500 with any law.
00:36:28.760 Because
00:36:29.240 every law
00:36:30.400 can be abused.
00:36:32.040 We have laws
00:36:32.920 against rape.
00:36:34.180 Has anybody
00:36:34.760 ever been
00:36:35.280 falsely accused
00:36:36.440 of rape?
00:36:37.560 Yeah.
00:36:38.500 I mean,
00:36:38.760 almost everything
00:36:39.340 can be abused.
00:36:40.920 So,
00:36:42.300 do you say
00:36:43.980 that you shouldn't
00:36:44.580 have a law
00:36:45.200 because it might
00:36:46.780 be abused?
00:36:48.020 That's not
00:36:48.580 a good enough reason.
00:36:50.320 I mean,
00:36:50.640 you'd have to be able
00:36:51.480 to measure
00:36:52.160 the size of the abuse.
00:36:54.100 Well,
00:36:54.280 how about this?
00:36:57.760 If you think
00:36:58.540 it's a good idea,
00:37:00.360 you're wrong. 0.83
00:37:02.200 And if you think
00:37:03.100 it's a bad idea,
00:37:04.380 you're wrong. 0.83
00:37:05.520 Why?
00:37:07.700 Can anybody
00:37:08.360 answer the question?
00:37:09.260 So,
00:37:09.480 there's my opinion.
00:37:10.420 If you think
00:37:11.040 that the red flag rules
00:37:12.160 are a good idea,
00:37:13.140 you're wrong. 0.83
00:37:13.920 If you think
00:37:14.580 they're a bad idea,
00:37:15.620 you're wrong. 0.83
00:37:16.780 Why do I say that?
00:37:21.560 Because you can
00:37:22.460 test it.
00:37:23.140 Thank you,
00:37:23.780 Anthony.
00:37:25.140 Anthony,
00:37:25.820 if you can test it,
00:37:27.320 you're having
00:37:27.640 the wrong debate.
00:37:29.260 The debate is,
00:37:30.200 where do we test it?
00:37:31.920 That's it.
00:37:33.600 Unless you want
00:37:34.320 to go full
00:37:34.980 constitutional
00:37:35.620 and say,
00:37:36.800 you know,
00:37:37.640 it's a red line,
00:37:39.840 don't test it.
00:37:40.780 But if you want
00:37:41.620 to know if it works,
00:37:44.040 find some place
00:37:44.980 that wants to test it.
00:37:45.960 find out.
00:37:47.880 Right?
00:37:48.240 You don't have
00:37:48.880 to debate it.
00:37:49.740 Just test it.
00:37:52.040 All right.
00:37:54.900 And so,
00:37:55.660 therefore,
00:37:55.940 I don't have
00:37:56.340 an opinion.
00:37:57.340 I don't have
00:37:58.060 any opinion on it
00:37:58.880 because it can be
00:37:59.500 tested.
00:38:03.400 An Israeli 0.79
00:38:04.160 cybersecurity company
00:38:05.300 says that Twitter
00:38:06.840 has 12%
00:38:07.880 bot-related traffic
00:38:10.360 at least.
00:38:11.000 Now,
00:38:12.340 the way that
00:38:12.740 they calculated it,
00:38:13.560 I think,
00:38:13.920 is a little bit
00:38:14.980 up to debate
00:38:17.080 because they don't
00:38:19.040 have internal
00:38:19.660 Twitter numbers.
00:38:20.840 They're just
00:38:21.060 looking at
00:38:22.520 external sites
00:38:23.500 that originated
00:38:24.240 from Twitter.
00:38:25.500 You know,
00:38:25.880 they think they've
00:38:26.620 got it figured out.
00:38:28.340 But I feel like
00:38:30.400 the asking price
00:38:33.500 for Twitter
00:38:34.000 is going to go down,
00:38:36.120 meaning that,
00:38:37.840 correct me if I'm wrong,
00:38:38.800 because I haven't
00:38:39.240 done a merger
00:38:40.300 of this size.
00:38:41.700 But when you make
00:38:42.680 a deal for a certain
00:38:43.640 dollar amount,
00:38:45.580 and then there's
00:38:46.240 a disclosure period,
00:38:47.320 right,
00:38:48.340 where you find out
00:38:49.560 if you're really
00:38:50.200 buying the thing
00:38:50.860 you thought you bought.
00:38:52.380 If you dig in
00:38:53.360 and find out
00:38:53.920 the number of bots
00:38:54.780 is way different
00:38:55.540 than what you thought
00:38:56.900 when you made
00:38:57.360 your offer,
00:38:58.620 then you would have
00:38:59.640 cause to renegotiate.
00:39:01.840 You'd say,
00:39:02.320 okay,
00:39:02.500 we've already said yes,
00:39:04.200 but now we've found
00:39:05.160 that this asset
00:39:06.040 is not as valuable
00:39:07.000 as we thought,
00:39:07.760 so let's decrease
00:39:08.520 it by 12%,
00:39:09.620 and I'll decrease
00:39:10.480 my offer by 12%,
00:39:11.740 or whatever
00:39:12.200 the numbers are.
00:39:18.980 The offer price
00:39:20.180 will go down,
00:39:21.120 not the asking.
00:39:23.560 Right,
00:39:24.160 the offer price
00:39:24.880 will go down.
00:39:26.980 Did I say
00:39:27.740 something else?
00:39:28.820 Yes,
00:39:29.160 the offer price
00:39:29.800 will go down.
00:39:33.120 Maybe.
00:39:33.840 So we'll see
00:39:34.260 if that happens.
00:39:34.800 So somehow
00:39:36.460 the EU,
00:39:38.040 the European Union
00:39:39.660 bloc
00:39:40.540 of them
00:39:41.640 have decided
00:39:42.280 to,
00:39:44.240 on Monday,
00:39:45.220 I guess,
00:39:45.540 just yesterday,
00:39:46.060 decided to cut
00:39:46.740 around 90%
00:39:47.560 of all Russian
00:39:48.260 oil imports
00:39:49.060 over the next
00:39:49.720 six months.
00:39:51.260 And they currently
00:39:52.480 import 25%
00:39:53.860 of their oil
00:39:54.320 from Russia.
00:39:56.540 Now,
00:39:56.840 is 25%
00:39:57.900 so much oil
00:39:59.100 that they can't
00:40:00.000 get that
00:40:00.340 from other sources?
00:40:01.140 I feel like
00:40:02.920 25%
00:40:03.740 is about
00:40:04.360 the amount
00:40:04.880 you can
00:40:06.400 get over. 0.54
00:40:08.940 In other words,
00:40:09.480 it's not
00:40:10.400 so much oil
00:40:11.480 that you can't
00:40:12.680 find other sources
00:40:13.740 in six months.
00:40:16.420 Now,
00:40:16.860 I imagine
00:40:17.300 that they would
00:40:17.780 not have made
00:40:18.340 this agreement
00:40:20.400 if they didn't
00:40:22.380 know they could
00:40:22.980 work it out,
00:40:24.100 or at least
00:40:24.820 they didn't
00:40:25.100 have a plan.
00:40:26.520 Gas is the
00:40:27.240 big issue,
00:40:27.740 as somebody's
00:40:28.060 saying.
00:40:28.360 Oil is not
00:40:29.080 the big issue,
00:40:29.560 it's the gas.
00:40:31.140 Because that's
00:40:32.240 a little harder
00:40:32.760 to source.
00:40:36.620 The North Sea
00:40:37.560 is running dry,
00:40:38.360 somebody says.
00:40:41.620 And Hungary
00:40:42.480 can still pipe that,
00:40:43.660 yeah.
00:40:44.340 So,
00:40:44.760 it makes you wonder
00:40:45.320 why it took so long.
00:40:46.680 And one of the
00:40:47.340 lessons that you
00:40:49.100 learn and relearn
00:40:50.700 all of your life
00:40:51.660 is that things
00:40:53.280 that seem essential
00:40:54.260 often are not.
00:40:56.180 Have you ever
00:40:56.620 been in a company
00:40:57.300 with a key employee
00:40:58.480 who if that one
00:40:59.820 employee left,
00:41:00.440 everything was
00:41:01.040 going to go to
00:41:01.500 hell?
00:41:02.380 And then that
00:41:02.860 one employee left.
00:41:04.860 And everything
00:41:05.500 was fine.
00:41:07.120 How many of you
00:41:07.920 have been in
00:41:08.220 that situation?
00:41:09.440 The key employee
00:41:10.180 left and everything
00:41:11.180 was fine.
00:41:13.040 Yep,
00:41:13.460 yes,
00:41:13.980 yes,
00:41:14.440 yep.
00:41:15.620 And look at all
00:41:16.180 the yeses going
00:41:16.860 by on locals.
00:41:19.240 Right.
00:41:20.600 So,
00:41:21.980 I feel like this
00:41:23.060 is another example
00:41:23.860 of that.
00:41:24.220 If you tell me
00:41:24.920 that,
00:41:25.720 no,
00:41:25.920 no,
00:41:26.080 no,
00:41:26.300 we cannot
00:41:26.900 find another
00:41:27.760 source for
00:41:28.420 25% of our
00:41:29.880 whatever,
00:41:32.620 unless it's,
00:41:33.540 you know,
00:41:33.860 rare earth
00:41:34.420 materials and
00:41:36.140 you have to do
00:41:37.040 it in a week,
00:41:37.980 I'm going to say
00:41:38.900 I feel like you
00:41:40.060 can always,
00:41:40.980 you can always
00:41:42.700 cut things by
00:41:43.500 25%.
00:41:44.640 It doesn't even
00:41:46.540 matter what the
00:41:47.000 category is.
00:41:48.280 Not always,
00:41:48.980 right?
00:41:49.120 But like 95%
00:41:51.120 of all situations
00:41:52.320 in the world,
00:41:54.060 you can cut
00:41:54.660 25% off it
00:41:55.920 and hardly
00:41:56.640 notice.
00:41:57.400 You'll make
00:41:57.720 adjustments.
00:42:01.900 All right.
00:42:04.720 Let's talk
00:42:05.380 about Putin's
00:42:06.020 health.
00:42:06.840 So that's in
00:42:07.380 the news again.
00:42:08.240 I would like to
00:42:09.000 remind you of
00:42:09.560 my record of
00:42:10.960 determining the
00:42:12.900 people's physical
00:42:14.440 health by looking
00:42:15.600 at them.
00:42:17.340 All right.
00:42:18.040 First time I did
00:42:18.980 this publicly
00:42:19.640 that I can
00:42:20.220 remember was I
00:42:22.940 said in the
00:42:23.360 2016 election
00:42:24.320 that Hillary 1.00
00:42:24.860 looked sick.
00:42:27.080 Does anybody
00:42:27.760 remember me
00:42:28.340 saying that a
00:42:28.840 lot?
00:42:29.700 That Hillary 1.00
00:42:30.080 looked sick
00:42:30.780 or drunk
00:42:32.180 or something.
00:42:33.100 And then she
00:42:33.600 did collapse
00:42:34.220 at the 9-11
00:42:34.900 event and there
00:42:35.640 was some kind
00:42:37.220 of health issue
00:42:38.360 that I don't
00:42:38.920 think has been
00:42:39.440 fully disclosed.
00:42:43.200 And would you
00:42:44.240 say that I was
00:42:44.900 correct in 2016
00:42:46.640 when I said
00:42:47.420 she looks
00:42:48.480 unhealthy?
00:42:51.320 Correct or
00:42:51.920 not correct?
00:42:53.540 Because many
00:42:54.020 and she had
00:42:54.780 that cough 0.90
00:42:55.280 that was weird
00:42:55.800 right?
00:42:56.460 It seems
00:42:57.240 correct.
00:42:58.300 You know
00:42:58.440 she had
00:42:58.780 walking
00:42:59.160 pneumonia or
00:42:59.760 something and
00:43:00.240 maybe I saw
00:43:01.160 it.
00:43:01.820 But I think
00:43:02.140 I was saying
00:43:02.600 it even
00:43:02.940 before the
00:43:03.480 pneumonia kicked
00:43:04.140 in.
00:43:04.820 Alleged
00:43:05.260 pneumonia.
00:43:06.700 Now so
00:43:07.160 that was my
00:43:07.680 first one.
00:43:08.100 I think that's
00:43:08.840 I'd give
00:43:09.700 myself a yes
00:43:10.660 on that.
00:43:11.540 Correct.
00:43:11.760 then I
00:43:15.260 also said
00:43:15.800 when Biden
00:43:16.340 was running
00:43:16.860 wait a minute
00:43:17.820 as many of
00:43:18.860 you did
00:43:19.180 he's clearly
00:43:20.540 mentally
00:43:21.000 incompetent.
00:43:22.740 And then I
00:43:23.380 heard from
00:43:23.760 somebody who
00:43:24.500 knew him
00:43:25.220 personally and
00:43:25.920 was in the
00:43:26.480 room with him
00:43:27.000 recently and
00:43:27.800 said you know
00:43:28.360 you're totally
00:43:28.860 wrong Scott.
00:43:30.500 I recently
00:43:31.500 talked to him
00:43:32.160 in person.
00:43:33.620 He's fine.
00:43:35.320 To which I
00:43:36.100 said I don't
00:43:38.100 think so.
00:43:38.600 I don't
00:43:42.060 think so.
00:43:43.700 And as
00:43:45.820 of today
00:43:46.440 wouldn't you
00:43:48.140 say I was
00:43:48.640 right?
00:43:49.560 That he's not
00:43:50.060 mentally capable
00:43:51.280 and that I
00:43:52.280 think he's
00:43:52.660 declined even
00:43:53.400 in the last
00:43:53.940 year in a
00:43:54.600 way that's
00:43:55.100 obvious to
00:43:55.700 most people.
00:43:57.220 So I think
00:43:57.700 I'm two for
00:43:58.180 two.
00:43:59.800 Would you
00:44:00.440 allow that
00:44:01.660 score to
00:44:03.000 stand?
00:44:03.500 Two for
00:44:03.780 two?
00:44:03.960 Two for
00:44:04.000 two?
00:44:06.180 Um
00:44:06.540 and now I
00:44:09.380 say that
00:44:09.740 Putin is
00:44:10.140 sick.
00:44:10.940 Now I'm
00:44:11.480 not going
00:44:11.760 to say he's
00:44:12.440 terminal.
00:44:13.780 I suppose
00:44:14.300 we're all
00:44:14.860 terminal.
00:44:16.240 But
00:44:16.640 there's
00:44:18.060 something wrong
00:44:18.580 with that
00:44:18.900 guy.
00:44:21.880 So I'm
00:44:22.460 going to
00:44:23.240 try to go
00:44:23.680 for three
00:44:24.140 for three.
00:44:24.740 There's just
00:44:25.060 something wrong
00:44:25.460 with that
00:44:25.720 guy.
00:44:26.300 Don't know
00:44:26.640 what it is.
00:44:27.240 Could be
00:44:27.560 his meds.
00:44:29.020 Maybe it's
00:44:29.820 not a bad
00:44:30.880 problem but
00:44:31.760 his meds are
00:44:32.500 causing him
00:44:32.980 to act
00:44:33.220 differently or
00:44:33.740 something.
00:44:34.560 I don't
00:44:34.740 know.
00:44:36.540 Well we'll
00:44:37.460 see.
00:44:39.560 Surprisingly the
00:44:40.660 DeLorean is 1.00
00:44:41.440 back.
00:44:42.460 Remember the
00:44:42.940 DeLorean with
00:44:44.480 the gull wing
00:44:45.220 doors and
00:44:45.980 back from the
00:44:46.980 future sort
00:44:47.700 of thing.
00:44:48.580 And I
00:44:49.880 guess the
00:44:50.380 founder of
00:44:51.120 the original
00:44:51.540 DeLorean got 0.96
00:44:52.360 busted for
00:44:53.140 selling cocaine
00:44:54.620 to finance his
00:44:55.820 car or
00:44:56.300 something like
00:44:56.740 that.
00:44:57.240 Was that
00:44:57.760 the story?
00:44:59.440 Anyway it's
00:45:01.520 coming back as
00:45:02.280 an electric
00:45:02.640 car and
00:45:04.820 has two
00:45:06.200 doors still
00:45:06.960 has that
00:45:07.260 gull wing
00:45:07.720 thing and
00:45:09.440 it would
00:45:10.380 compete with
00:45:11.020 a Tesla for
00:45:11.900 example.
00:45:13.060 But the
00:45:13.780 design is
00:45:14.380 really good.
00:45:17.020 So one of
00:45:17.960 the things that
00:45:18.340 the DeLorean did
00:45:19.040 well is it
00:45:19.500 looked cool.
00:45:20.960 It's one of
00:45:21.420 the things that
00:45:21.880 Musk got right
00:45:22.820 with his
00:45:23.320 original,
00:45:24.700 his first
00:45:25.760 electric car.
00:45:27.120 It looked
00:45:27.500 cool.
00:45:28.820 But I'm
00:45:29.980 not sure that
00:45:30.620 the Tesla
00:45:31.380 design in its
00:45:32.980 current form
00:45:33.920 people buy
00:45:36.340 because of
00:45:37.160 the outside
00:45:37.980 design.
00:45:39.520 Let me ask
00:45:40.000 you, how
00:45:40.820 many of you
00:45:41.220 think that a
00:45:42.360 regular Tesla,
00:45:43.660 let's not talk
00:45:44.620 about the
00:45:44.940 truck because
00:45:45.520 that's more of
00:45:45.960 a high design
00:45:46.520 situation, but
00:45:47.740 how many of you
00:45:48.200 think that the
00:45:48.720 ordinary Tesla
00:45:49.660 has a look
00:45:51.560 where you look
00:45:52.180 at it and
00:45:52.420 say,
00:45:52.680 hmm,
00:45:53.420 got to get
00:45:54.460 some of
00:45:54.760 that.
00:45:55.020 so it's
00:46:01.320 a mixed
00:46:01.640 bag of
00:46:02.720 saying,
00:46:03.040 a lot of
00:46:03.300 people are
00:46:03.600 saying it's
00:46:03.980 ugly, but
00:46:04.440 other people
00:46:04.840 are saying
00:46:05.240 they like
00:46:06.120 it.
00:46:09.120 Yeah.
00:46:10.040 So some
00:46:10.780 people are
00:46:11.100 saying it's
00:46:11.460 nice, some
00:46:12.500 people say
00:46:12.900 meh.
00:46:13.540 Now, at
00:46:14.180 one point I
00:46:14.700 said to
00:46:15.000 myself,
00:46:15.480 huh, I
00:46:16.660 wonder if
00:46:17.000 this was a
00:46:17.700 rare mistake
00:46:20.180 because you
00:46:21.780 could have
00:46:22.240 made it more
00:46:23.060 like a
00:46:23.500 DeLorean,
00:46:24.140 more sports
00:46:25.000 car-ish, but
00:46:26.300 on the other
00:46:26.820 hand, there
00:46:28.480 is a very
00:46:28.920 large percentage
00:46:29.660 of the public
00:46:30.140 that won't
00:46:30.600 buy something
00:46:31.260 that's too
00:46:31.680 flashy.
00:46:34.720 So I've
00:46:35.320 got a feeling
00:46:35.780 that if you
00:46:36.280 want to sell
00:46:36.660 cars to
00:46:37.360 regular people,
00:46:39.280 you have to
00:46:39.800 make them
00:46:40.240 regular
00:46:41.040 ordinary.
00:46:42.800 I think
00:46:43.480 we're too
00:46:44.080 into our
00:46:48.080 lifestyle and
00:46:49.340 the way we
00:46:49.860 present it.
00:46:51.220 You can't
00:46:51.820 take people
00:46:52.300 who want to
00:46:52.920 be under
00:46:53.280 the radar and
00:46:54.080 give them a
00:46:54.560 cool car
00:46:55.120 because they're
00:46:56.240 not going to
00:46:56.580 want it.
00:46:59.420 So I've
00:46:59.980 got a feeling
00:47:00.360 that the
00:47:00.700 DeLorean will 1.00
00:47:01.360 limit its
00:47:02.140 audience to
00:47:02.900 the high-end
00:47:04.060 performance
00:47:04.740 audience because
00:47:06.500 the average
00:47:06.940 mom and
00:47:07.540 dad just
00:47:08.100 want trunk
00:47:09.040 space.
00:47:13.580 And that,
00:47:14.540 ladies and 0.98
00:47:14.800 gentlemen,
00:47:15.560 is the
00:47:17.000 conclusion of
00:47:17.660 my prepared
00:47:18.240 remarks.
00:47:19.440 And I
00:47:20.080 would like
00:47:20.380 now a
00:47:21.080 medical rating.
00:47:22.960 if you're
00:47:23.540 joining me
00:47:24.060 late,
00:47:25.680 I'm on
00:47:26.580 the third
00:47:27.000 day of
00:47:27.280 the COVID,
00:47:27.940 still testing
00:47:28.660 positive,
00:47:29.220 just tested
00:47:29.660 myself before
00:47:31.060 the live stream
00:47:31.560 started.
00:47:32.980 And so I'm
00:47:33.940 infectious as a
00:47:34.900 mofo, but I 0.79
00:47:35.580 don't have any
00:47:36.100 obvious symptoms
00:47:37.320 that I can feel.
00:47:38.360 So here's the
00:47:38.880 question.
00:47:40.580 Could you
00:47:41.060 detect my
00:47:42.100 brain fog?
00:47:44.100 Go.
00:47:44.360 Go.
00:47:48.600 Locals are 1.00
00:47:49.160 saying no.
00:47:49.660 what do you
00:47:51.900 say,
00:47:52.200 YouTube?
00:47:52.620 Could you
00:47:53.000 detect my
00:47:53.720 brain fog?
00:47:57.520 I'm seeing
00:47:58.300 some yeses.
00:48:00.220 Seeing some
00:48:01.000 yeses.
00:48:03.300 How many of
00:48:04.220 you think that
00:48:04.900 the brain fog
00:48:06.060 detection could
00:48:07.500 be imaginary?
00:48:11.380 A lot of
00:48:12.140 yeses.
00:48:13.520 A lot of
00:48:14.280 yeses.
00:48:17.000 Yes, you
00:48:17.760 appear to be
00:48:18.420 unreasonable.
00:48:19.660 How many
00:48:20.160 think that?
00:48:21.600 Is there
00:48:22.200 anybody else
00:48:22.760 who thinks
00:48:23.240 that I was
00:48:24.300 more strident
00:48:25.960 or unreasonable
00:48:27.020 today?
00:48:31.460 Kind of
00:48:32.060 subjective.
00:48:33.500 Yeah.
00:48:34.100 All right.
00:48:34.580 Would it
00:48:34.900 make any
00:48:35.360 difference if
00:48:35.980 you knew
00:48:36.440 that I'm
00:48:38.760 also heavily
00:48:39.520 under the
00:48:40.000 influence of
00:48:40.580 marijuana?
00:48:41.000 I got this
00:48:45.640 new batch
00:48:46.720 recently that
00:48:48.440 has the
00:48:48.780 highest THC
00:48:49.720 concentration
00:48:50.460 I've ever
00:48:50.960 experienced.
00:48:52.360 39%.
00:48:52.960 Now, if
00:48:54.380 anybody's
00:48:55.260 familiar with
00:48:56.160 the field,
00:48:58.140 39% is
00:48:59.580 shocking.
00:49:00.660 I didn't even
00:49:01.180 know that was
00:49:01.580 even possible,
00:49:02.300 frankly.
00:49:03.200 30% is
00:49:04.280 sort of will
00:49:05.320 blow your 0.91
00:49:05.800 socks off.
00:49:06.400 If you're
00:49:08.560 not really
00:49:09.140 experienced,
00:49:09.780 you don't
00:49:10.000 want to go
00:49:10.300 over 30%.
00:49:11.300 So I didn't
00:49:11.760 know what I
00:49:12.160 was going to
00:49:12.480 get at 39%.
00:49:13.580 But it's
00:49:14.460 definitely
00:49:15.340 different.
00:49:17.080 It definitely
00:49:17.800 is quite a
00:49:19.820 charge.
00:49:24.020 Yeah, I
00:49:24.720 don't think
00:49:25.040 the fog is
00:49:25.560 made up.
00:49:26.220 So internally,
00:49:27.360 I feel like
00:49:28.880 I may have
00:49:30.020 some fog.
00:49:31.620 But I can't
00:49:32.520 tell yet in
00:49:33.220 terms of my
00:49:33.800 performance.
00:49:34.380 You don't
00:49:39.040 look well.
00:49:40.280 Well, I'm
00:49:40.560 not.
00:49:43.160 Did I just
00:49:43.960 tell you?
00:49:44.420 I've got a
00:49:45.440 terrible disease.
00:49:48.380 Apparently,
00:49:49.000 it's not that
00:49:49.400 terrible.
00:49:52.900 Maybe COVID
00:49:53.780 blocks caffeine
00:49:54.700 absorption.
00:49:55.320 You know
00:49:55.500 what?
00:49:56.260 So Jen
00:49:56.880 says maybe
00:49:57.580 COVID blocks
00:49:58.560 caffeine
00:49:59.100 absorption.
00:50:00.100 Now, I
00:50:00.400 don't think
00:50:00.740 that's true.
00:50:01.380 We probably
00:50:01.780 wouldn't have
00:50:02.120 noticed it.
00:50:02.780 But it
00:50:03.100 feels exactly
00:50:03.900 like that.
00:50:04.380 It feels
00:50:05.660 exactly like
00:50:06.460 I didn't
00:50:06.740 have coffee.
00:50:07.840 That's what
00:50:08.420 it feels
00:50:08.740 like.
00:50:12.320 So you're
00:50:13.060 saying you're
00:50:13.440 better isn't
00:50:14.020 necessarily
00:50:14.500 true.
00:50:14.840 No, my
00:50:15.460 internal sense
00:50:16.500 of how I
00:50:18.020 feel is
00:50:18.540 completely
00:50:18.940 better.
00:50:20.540 I do
00:50:21.240 have, I
00:50:22.680 would call
00:50:23.040 it maybe
00:50:23.520 like a
00:50:24.020 pressure or
00:50:24.900 something on
00:50:26.820 my brain.
00:50:28.680 Like, things
00:50:29.460 look different,
00:50:30.760 for sure.
00:50:31.540 anyway, it's
00:50:36.700 kind of
00:50:36.920 fascinating.
00:50:37.680 I would
00:50:37.900 just encourage
00:50:38.820 you not to
00:50:39.420 believe any
00:50:39.940 story of
00:50:40.560 somebody who
00:50:40.980 had a
00:50:41.460 miraculous
00:50:41.980 recovery from
00:50:42.820 COVID, because
00:50:43.960 they took
00:50:44.360 anything.
00:50:45.360 Because apparently
00:50:45.960 the symptoms
00:50:46.520 just do go
00:50:47.300 away all at
00:50:47.940 once when
00:50:48.780 they go away.
00:50:49.960 So you're
00:50:50.760 going to
00:50:50.980 blame or
00:50:51.780 credit whatever
00:50:52.680 you were taking
00:50:53.320 10 minutes
00:50:53.820 before they
00:50:54.280 went away.
00:50:54.680 and you
00:50:55.640 will be
00:50:55.940 wrong.
00:50:57.520 You always
00:50:58.100 get a brain
00:50:58.540 fog when
00:50:59.020 you have a
00:50:59.340 cold or a
00:50:59.760 fever.
00:51:01.180 You know,
00:51:02.360 honestly, it's
00:51:02.920 been 30 years
00:51:04.000 or more since
00:51:04.800 I had anything
00:51:05.400 that was like a
00:51:05.960 bad cold or
00:51:06.900 flu or anything
00:51:07.900 like that.
00:51:08.780 So I didn't
00:51:09.540 even know what
00:51:09.920 it felt like to
00:51:10.420 be sick. 0.97
00:51:11.440 I'd literally
00:51:12.060 forgotten what
00:51:12.700 it felt like to
00:51:14.140 feel bad.
00:51:15.880 I mean, I
00:51:16.340 guess that's the
00:51:16.820 good news.
00:51:19.000 All right, I
00:51:20.140 don't feel
00:51:20.760 depressed, because
00:51:22.860 I've heard that
00:51:23.340 some people have
00:51:24.140 symptoms of
00:51:25.640 depression, so I
00:51:27.520 don't feel that.
00:51:29.000 And here's the
00:51:29.960 weirdest part.
00:51:30.680 I think it
00:51:31.160 cured my
00:51:31.860 attention
00:51:34.560 deficit
00:51:35.060 disorder.
00:51:36.200 Now, I
00:51:36.420 don't have
00:51:36.800 actual diagnosis
00:51:38.240 of that, but
00:51:39.500 there's a time
00:51:40.060 of the day when
00:51:40.600 I just can't
00:51:41.220 concentrate.
00:51:42.460 I just can't
00:51:43.140 concentrate.
00:51:44.960 And yesterday,
00:51:47.400 I did an
00:51:48.120 experiment.
00:51:49.580 I said to
00:51:50.060 myself, I
00:51:50.580 wonder if I
00:51:50.960 could just sit
00:51:51.500 in the chair,
00:51:52.700 just sit here,
00:51:53.300 and be
00:51:54.540 satisfied.
00:51:56.620 Do nothing
00:51:57.300 else, just
00:51:57.740 sit here in
00:51:58.420 the chair.
00:51:59.860 And this is
00:52:00.640 something I've
00:52:01.120 tried lots of
00:52:01.820 times before,
00:52:03.060 because I
00:52:03.360 wanted to see
00:52:03.780 if maybe I
00:52:04.520 could get into
00:52:04.980 meditating again.
00:52:06.560 And I thought,
00:52:07.180 well, I'll just
00:52:07.600 try to sit
00:52:09.520 here and just
00:52:10.660 be happy.
00:52:12.520 I've never been
00:52:13.280 able to do it
00:52:14.060 until yesterday.
00:52:16.800 Yesterday, I
00:52:17.660 had the weird
00:52:18.200 experience, which
00:52:18.920 I reproduced a
00:52:19.740 number of times
00:52:20.280 during the day,
00:52:21.400 of saying, what
00:52:22.060 if I just
00:52:22.460 sit here?
00:52:23.920 Just sit
00:52:24.560 here.
00:52:25.620 And I would
00:52:26.180 just sit
00:52:26.620 there, and
00:52:28.960 I was totally
00:52:29.480 happy.
00:52:30.580 I've never
00:52:31.300 experienced that
00:52:32.000 before.
00:52:33.220 Never.
00:52:34.740 Now, I
00:52:35.160 think, yeah,
00:52:36.320 it was
00:52:36.520 outside.
00:52:37.480 One was
00:52:38.100 outside, but
00:52:39.700 not every time.
00:52:40.440 Once was
00:52:40.820 outside.
00:52:45.840 Well, I'm
00:52:46.520 always high, but
00:52:47.240 that doesn't
00:52:47.580 make a difference,
00:52:48.800 because I've
00:52:49.280 done the
00:52:49.580 experiment in
00:52:50.320 every condition.
00:52:51.420 So I know
00:52:51.740 that doesn't
00:52:52.120 make a
00:52:52.380 difference.
00:52:53.420 So my
00:52:53.800 natural brain
00:52:55.580 cycles are
00:52:56.980 running at
00:52:57.600 I don't know
00:53:00.700 how to compare
00:53:01.240 it to anybody
00:53:01.760 else's, right?
00:53:02.540 Because everybody
00:53:03.060 has their own
00:53:03.520 subjective thing
00:53:04.240 going on.
00:53:05.120 But my
00:53:05.760 subjective
00:53:07.100 experience of
00:53:08.040 what happens
00:53:08.480 in my head
00:53:09.080 is that when
00:53:10.240 I wake up in
00:53:10.820 the morning,
00:53:11.700 my clock speed
00:53:12.700 of my brain
00:53:13.320 is just right,
00:53:14.780 and I can get
00:53:15.680 a lot done,
00:53:16.100 I can concentrate.
00:53:16.780 By the
00:53:18.100 middle of
00:53:18.460 the day,
00:53:19.400 there are so
00:53:19.960 many things
00:53:20.440 happening
00:53:20.800 simultaneously
00:53:21.440 in my brain
00:53:22.420 that it's
00:53:23.580 hard to do
00:53:24.040 anything.
00:53:25.320 There's just
00:53:25.740 too much
00:53:26.080 crashing in
00:53:26.800 at the same
00:53:27.200 time.
00:53:27.960 You walk
00:53:28.540 outside.
00:53:29.380 If I open
00:53:29.960 this door
00:53:30.360 and walk
00:53:30.720 out, I
00:53:31.800 will be
00:53:32.100 met with
00:53:32.540 three new
00:53:33.140 variables.
00:53:34.580 Somebody
00:53:35.020 needs
00:53:35.380 something,
00:53:36.080 I found
00:53:36.560 out a new
00:53:37.000 thing,
00:53:37.380 the phone
00:53:37.700 rings,
00:53:38.820 that sort
00:53:39.660 of thing.
00:53:39.940 The dog
00:53:40.380 throws up
00:53:41.340 on the
00:53:41.540 ground.
00:53:42.940 So we're
00:53:44.900 overwhelmed with
00:53:45.700 all this
00:53:45.980 complexity.
00:53:48.220 And yesterday
00:53:48.800 I just sat
00:53:49.380 there and
00:53:49.960 didn't think
00:53:51.520 of any of
00:53:51.900 it.
00:53:53.080 Now, I
00:53:54.220 assume that's
00:53:54.840 brain damage.
00:53:56.500 I don't
00:53:57.180 think that's
00:53:57.640 like a cure.
00:53:58.900 I think it's
00:53:59.700 brain damage.
00:54:01.000 But I'm
00:54:01.580 hoping it's
00:54:02.020 temporary.
00:54:03.480 So I'm
00:54:04.880 going to try
00:54:05.280 doing some
00:54:06.600 cartooning
00:54:07.220 today, the
00:54:08.520 writing.
00:54:09.000 The writing's
00:54:09.580 the hard part.
00:54:10.880 And I'm
00:54:11.120 going to see
00:54:11.560 if anything
00:54:12.340 I write today
00:54:13.120 is funny.
00:54:13.720 that will
00:54:15.600 be the
00:54:15.880 test.
00:54:18.000 So we'll
00:54:18.580 see.
00:54:20.360 All right,
00:54:20.760 this, ladies 0.96
00:54:21.300 and gentlemen,
00:54:21.820 was the best
00:54:22.520 show you've
00:54:22.980 ever seen
00:54:23.540 in your
00:54:24.140 life.
00:54:24.480 I think
00:54:24.740 you'd
00:54:24.920 agree.
00:54:25.880 And I'll
00:54:26.440 keep you
00:54:26.780 informed on
00:54:27.480 my recovery
00:54:29.120 or non-recovery
00:54:30.640 as it goes.
00:54:32.320 And we'll
00:54:33.000 talk to you
00:54:33.540 tomorrow.
00:54:34.520 Bye for
00:54:35.720 now.
00:54:35.900 Bye.
00:55:04.520 Bye.