Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 01, 2022


Episode 1761 Scott Adams： Well, It Turns Out Everything You Suspected Was True. Let's Talk About It


Episode Stats

Length

42 minutes

Words per Minute

136.383

Word Count

5,764

Sentence Count

437

Misogynist Sentences

9

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

Coffee with Scott Adams. Today's episode features an update on my COVID quarantine, a Spider-Man update, and a discussion about hate speech and the future of the free speech debate. Plus, a special guest appearance from a very special guest!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Ba-ba-ba, ba-ba-da-da-da-da-da.
00:00:05.540 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization.
00:00:11.780 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and may I say that this will be the best one of all time.
00:00:18.560 We're going to do the simultaneous sip first, and then let me tell you, it's going to go skyrocketing after that.
00:00:26.500 Skyrocketing, I tell you, never better.
00:00:28.640 And all you need to get this going is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:37.040 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:39.820 I like coffee.
00:00:41.460 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine to the day, the thing that puts a tingle on the back of your neck.
00:00:50.980 It's called the simultaneous sip, and a lot of simultaneous things are going to happen right now.
00:00:56.360 Go.
00:00:58.640 Yeah, that was perfect, actually.
00:01:07.860 So here's an update on my COVID quarantine situation.
00:01:12.160 Update, update.
00:01:13.080 Let's see.
00:01:17.040 So Saturday was my first symptoms, and I tested positive with the home test.
00:01:22.000 Today is Wednesday.
00:01:25.400 And I feel not just 100% better, but better than I've ever been.
00:01:32.780 And here's why.
00:01:35.500 I realized the other day, because I had a little online side conversation, that some part of long COVID could be confirmation bias.
00:01:46.720 Right?
00:01:47.060 You think you're going to have these lasting symptoms, then anything that ever happens to you for the next 10 years, you say, well, it's because of the COVID.
00:01:58.960 Am I right?
00:01:59.520 You're basically going to imagine yourself into every symptom you were going to have anyway, being long COVID.
00:02:07.140 Now, knowing that that's the case, what would be the defense?
00:02:11.260 And I've employed what I call the Spider-Man reframe.
00:02:16.120 Now, I don't know if this will work yet, but it seems to be working so far.
00:02:20.740 And the Spider-Man reframe goes like this.
00:02:25.540 Not every mutation is bad.
00:02:29.240 Sometimes it's a superpower.
00:02:31.540 And so instead of looking for whatever, you know, negative health consequences I might have in the future and saying, well, I think there's my long COVID kicking in.
00:02:40.180 I'm going to look for anything that looks like things are going a little extra well for me.
00:02:45.240 And I'm going to say, I think that's from the COVID.
00:02:48.640 For example, just today, I was thinking, is it just me or do I look a little extra sexy today?
00:02:57.060 And I thought, it's not my imagination.
00:03:01.660 It's the long COVID.
00:03:03.840 It's starting to kick in with some benefits.
00:03:06.820 That's the first one.
00:03:07.900 I mean, that's the obvious one.
00:03:09.100 Probably a lot of you noticed as soon as you signed on.
00:03:11.780 You're thinking, what is it?
00:03:13.240 Why is he a little bit sexier?
00:03:15.360 Did something happen?
00:03:16.540 Yeah, yeah.
00:03:17.300 It's called long COVID, Spider-Man edition.
00:03:22.020 Superpowers.
00:03:23.360 Now, you're also saying, why is he funnier?
00:03:25.460 Why is this a better show today?
00:03:27.400 Same reason.
00:03:28.960 Same reason.
00:03:30.300 Long COVID, Spider-Man edition.
00:03:33.020 Now, some people are going to get the, you know, the low energy and the, I don't know, all kinds of bad things, supposedly.
00:03:40.240 And they are not framing this right.
00:03:43.800 They're creating the wrong future for themselves in this simulation.
00:03:47.740 So, if, as we go on, it seems to you that I'm smarter, better adjusted, happier, or any of those things, it's not your imagination.
00:04:00.360 That's the long COVID.
00:04:02.740 Kick it in.
00:04:04.160 Spider-Man edition.
00:04:05.140 All right.
00:04:06.960 All right.
00:04:08.860 Have you noticed that whoever it is that's in control of the truth would love to also limit hate speech?
00:04:17.780 That's a dangerous combination, isn't it?
00:04:21.600 Because if I just said to you, hey, maybe we should have less hate speech, and that's the only variable, yeah, less hate speech.
00:04:30.880 That's good.
00:04:31.740 Your first instinct might be, hey, I'd like a little less hate speech.
00:04:35.700 But what if somebody else is in charge of deciding what that hate speech is?
00:04:44.120 Well, then suddenly it's the worst thing in the world.
00:04:48.240 So, Rasmussen did a little poll here and said, found out that 58% of Democrats say the federal government should take action to suppress online hate speech.
00:04:59.860 But that view is shared by only 31% of Republicans and voters not affiliated with either major party.
00:05:10.020 So, 58% of Democrats want the federal government to do more about hate speech.
00:05:18.940 Now, Democrats are also the ones who sort of are in charge of the government, or a lot of it.
00:05:26.920 So, wouldn't this be the worst thing in the world?
00:05:30.860 You just can't have these two things at the same time.
00:05:35.000 Well, maybe you just need free speech, and that's the end of that conversation.
00:05:43.340 And also, I saw a tweet by the Rasmussen account, which you should be following, Rasmussen Reports.
00:05:55.280 And this was Abe Lincoln, right?
00:05:58.940 This quote.
00:05:59.860 You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
00:06:08.320 And I thought to myself, that needs to be updated a little bit.
00:06:11.980 See if you can tell what's missing.
00:06:13.220 It was probably pretty clever back when Lincoln said it, and I imagine if I'd been there, I would have said, whoa, well said, well said, Abe.
00:06:24.640 If I had been there at the time.
00:06:26.020 But it doesn't age well.
00:06:29.280 It didn't age well.
00:06:30.360 I'll tell you why.
00:06:31.160 So, I'll give it to you again, see if you can hear it.
00:06:33.760 What is missing from this?
00:06:36.620 Quote, you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
00:06:44.700 Well, I'll tell you what's missing.
00:06:45.720 That's the most important part, which matters today.
00:06:50.060 You only need to fool half of the people all the time.
00:06:53.060 And that's kind of easy.
00:06:57.540 You only need to fool half the people.
00:07:01.520 And unfortunately, you can do that all the time.
00:07:07.160 We just won't agree which half it is.
00:07:10.400 I'm pretty sure it's the half I'm not in.
00:07:14.560 Can we take a vote?
00:07:16.900 I feel it like this is something we can agree on.
00:07:19.520 And although we all have completely different opinions all over the board, can we agree that the half that's wrong is the half that we're not in?
00:07:29.620 Everybody, can we agree on that?
00:07:31.460 Right?
00:07:32.240 Am I right?
00:07:32.800 Yeah.
00:07:33.400 It's the other people.
00:07:36.260 If I were to write an essay on what is the one problem that's with this country, and maybe, yay, the world.
00:07:47.080 The big problem, it's other people.
00:07:51.740 It's other people.
00:07:53.880 Present company excluded, obviously.
00:07:56.700 You're pretty awesome.
00:07:58.600 You're pretty awesome, and I know I am.
00:08:01.040 So, it's really other people.
00:08:03.620 Other people.
00:08:05.320 Now, I know they think the same thing, but the difference is they're wrong.
00:08:10.280 That's how other people are.
00:08:13.240 No wonder people don't like other people.
00:08:15.700 If you think about how other people act, well, it's just natural.
00:08:23.180 Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary, she admits that maybe she was wrong about this whole inflation thing.
00:08:32.320 So, I thought it was a little bit more transitory than it was.
00:08:35.900 I just love the fact that her last name is Yellen.
00:08:42.500 Y-E-L-L-E-N.
00:08:46.960 Do you think that caused her to have to modify her behavior at all at any point in her life?
00:08:52.160 I don't know if that's her born name or if that's a married name.
00:08:56.120 But I hate to be a woman in a powerful position and have the last name of Yellen.
00:09:03.800 I wasn't even thinking of old Yellen.
00:09:16.060 Okay, that's a funny reference.
00:09:19.220 But I was just thinking, you know, don't women always say,
00:09:23.520 I don't have personal experience here, but correct me if I'm wrong,
00:09:26.880 but don't women always say that, you know, they're judged more harshly if they're tough in business?
00:09:34.800 And here's Janet Yellen.
00:09:36.000 She's at the top of her game in business, Treasury Secretary, doing pretty well.
00:09:42.460 And her last name is Yellen.
00:09:44.880 Yellen, I wonder if she had to be extra soft and she still scared people.
00:09:52.700 Like, you've been called to the boss's office.
00:09:57.420 The boss? Yellen?
00:09:59.900 Well, I don't know if she'll be Yellen.
00:10:01.700 No, I mean, that's her name.
00:10:03.180 Yeah.
00:10:04.740 I mean, she just sounds scary.
00:10:06.780 I wouldn't want to go to a boss's office if her name was Yellen.
00:10:10.660 Anyway, she says that she was wrong about this inflation thing.
00:10:15.160 How many of you think she was wrong and how many of you think she was lying and knew it?
00:10:20.800 I guess you'd have to know it if you were lying.
00:10:23.360 How many think she was lying in the comments?
00:10:26.360 Comments?
00:10:28.000 Oh, you skeptics.
00:10:30.300 Oh, you disbelievers.
00:10:32.660 Why do you distrust government officials so?
00:10:37.280 Oh, oh, I'm so disappointed in all of you.
00:10:40.780 For being so distrustful.
00:10:42.320 Okay, yes.
00:10:44.360 I'm going to say that we can't read minds.
00:10:50.420 Right?
00:10:51.380 Can't read minds.
00:10:53.540 I will allow.
00:10:54.600 I will allow.
00:10:57.200 That's possible she's not lying.
00:11:00.180 Because the other possibility is that she's confessing that she's thoroughly incompetent at her job.
00:11:06.840 And I think we should at least give her that benefit of a doubt.
00:11:11.180 If she's saying, no, I'm not lying, I'm just really, really bad at my job and should never be in this position, maybe we should believe her.
00:11:22.360 No, I'm just kidding.
00:11:23.640 I'm kidding.
00:11:24.260 She lied.
00:11:24.740 But we guess.
00:11:27.060 We don't know.
00:11:28.520 But it kind of looks like it, doesn't it?
00:11:31.820 New York Times had an article.
00:11:34.400 Now, the important part about this is that it's the New York Times.
00:11:39.140 So New York Times is the paper of record, blah, blah, blah.
00:11:42.960 So if they say it, it's supposed to be true.
00:11:44.880 So I'm not going to get into an argument too much about what's true or not.
00:11:49.520 Yeah, I am a little bit.
00:11:50.900 Okay.
00:11:51.540 I'm lying.
00:11:54.060 So New York Times had an article that says basically that what we know now is that masks do work, but mandates don't.
00:12:03.640 Meaning that masks work, except that when you wear them, they don't do anything that you hoped would happen when you wear them.
00:12:12.700 But they work.
00:12:14.880 But they work.
00:12:17.500 Now, I'm wondering if this is sort of the difference between the engineer and the politician or something.
00:12:25.180 You know, two views of the world.
00:12:27.040 Let me ask you a question to see where your brain is at, all right?
00:12:30.660 If you took a screen off a screen door, and then you took a bucket of water, and you poured it through the screen,
00:12:39.620 would the screen door, you know, an actual screen from your door, would it stop the water?
00:12:48.720 Let's say that was your intention, was to stop the water.
00:12:54.660 Would it do it?
00:12:56.740 What do you say?
00:12:57.500 Some say no.
00:13:02.920 Some say stop.
00:13:04.000 Some?
00:13:04.440 What do you mean some?
00:13:05.720 The thing's full of holes.
00:13:08.040 Why only some?
00:13:09.760 Some say it slows it down.
00:13:11.240 Well, so, I guess it depends how much of an engineer you are.
00:13:18.980 And I mean that in the best possible sense, because I always have the highest regard for the way engineers think.
00:13:27.600 More so than scientists in many ways.
00:13:30.420 Because it's more the practical way of thinking.
00:13:34.980 And here's how I think of it.
00:13:37.880 When I imagine pouring water through a screen, if you can touch the screen right after you poured the water,
00:13:45.040 and it's still wet, it did something.
00:13:48.900 But if you could argue that it worked, or that you should put screens on your roof instead of shingles,
00:13:54.960 that's sort of a bad argument.
00:13:56.780 So, things may technically slow things down.
00:13:59.760 So, I think when they did studies that say masks work,
00:14:04.340 it did create some friction, but not enough to make a difference.
00:14:08.360 And then the article hypothesizes that it's because people were bad at wearing their masks.
00:14:15.780 Here's what I think.
00:14:17.880 Nobody socially distanced at home.
00:14:21.740 Maybe that's the whole thing.
00:14:23.680 Maybe it doesn't matter what you say about masks.
00:14:27.620 If people go home and just take them off and do whatever the hell they want to do.
00:14:33.340 Especially with their neighbors and their friends.
00:14:35.620 Because I think there was such massive non-social distancing
00:14:40.140 that there's nothing you could have done with masks that you would have noticed in the data.
00:14:47.060 But at least the New York Times has said that you can't...
00:14:51.700 It's not obvious in the data.
00:14:54.240 Now, as Andres Backhouse points out,
00:14:56.700 that's not the standard for knowing if something worked.
00:15:02.160 You can't just sort of look at two places or even two things that you think are similar
00:15:07.240 in different periods of time.
00:15:09.000 You're never really comparing the right stuff.
00:15:12.460 So, you can never really be sure.
00:15:14.100 And there are too many variables in there, etc.
00:15:15.700 But, if you're making a social policy that's affecting a lot of people,
00:15:21.780 like in a really fundamental way,
00:15:23.980 and there's not enough of a positive impact that you can even identify it,
00:15:29.240 that's a good enough reason not to do it.
00:15:32.680 Because freedom has to be the tiebreaker, right?
00:15:35.980 If you can't tell if it makes a difference overall,
00:15:40.080 you have to go with freedom.
00:15:42.500 To me, that seems like a no-brainer.
00:15:44.420 Anyway, so I think you could say that masks worked in some minor way
00:15:50.680 that didn't matter to the pandemic.
00:15:56.600 How about this for timing?
00:16:00.520 You know, do you ever think that you live in a simulation
00:16:02.520 and it's designed just to F with you, personally?
00:16:07.260 Here was my situation.
00:16:10.820 For about three years now, or whatever it's been,
00:16:13.540 I've been trying to surf this pandemic and play it right.
00:16:19.340 So, early on, when it was the fog of war,
00:16:23.180 I went into maximum caution.
00:16:26.660 I never washed my groceries.
00:16:30.800 So, I was never worried about surfaces too much.
00:16:33.600 Well, maybe in the first week or so I was.
00:16:35.820 But, you know, the fog of war, I played it that way.
00:16:40.740 And I go, okay, good.
00:16:42.620 Even though I, you know, over, I exaggerated the risk in my mind,
00:16:47.420 I didn't get the virus.
00:16:50.120 And it was, you know, just a few weeks, no big deal.
00:16:53.380 But then as we learned, you know, more and more about it,
00:16:55.980 I thought, okay, my best bet is to let other people get the vaccination first
00:16:59.820 and I'd wait as long as I can without getting the virus
00:17:04.480 before I get the vaccination, before I even decide.
00:17:08.300 And then I decided I wanted it because I wanted to travel, basically.
00:17:12.180 Now, getting the vaccination in my case never made any difference,
00:17:17.540 as far as I can tell.
00:17:19.240 In other words, I believe I got a vaccination.
00:17:21.620 They gave me a risk of a vaccination, however small.
00:17:24.960 I don't know what size it is.
00:17:27.340 But I can tell at this point, because I actually didn't contract it
00:17:31.620 and it's unlikely that the vaccination would have stopped me from contracting it,
00:17:35.560 that I got the, that I took the risk of the vaccination.
00:17:39.840 But now I know that it didn't benefit me.
00:17:42.820 It doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.
00:17:45.320 It just means that when you buy insurance, you don't always catch on fire.
00:17:49.660 So if you think of it as an insurance policy, it wasn't wrong.
00:17:53.140 It just, now we know how it turned down.
00:17:57.900 Yeah, and it was my choice.
00:17:59.480 It was my choice.
00:18:00.420 That was key.
00:18:01.600 As somebody says, the key thing here is it was my choice the whole time.
00:18:05.020 Then I decided to not get the second set of boosters.
00:18:09.100 So I got the first two, the pair.
00:18:11.720 And I said to myself, oh, now this Omicron's coming along.
00:18:16.120 Now with the Omicron, once I get that,
00:18:19.820 because I probably will, everybody will,
00:18:22.460 then I've got the Omicron immunity.
00:18:25.600 The Delta and the Alpha are behind us, I think.
00:18:30.340 And then I've got all my Omicron immunity.
00:18:33.680 It's better than having even a vaccination,
00:18:36.380 because apparently the vaccination doesn't do much for Omicron.
00:18:38.800 And like, just yesterday, I said to myself, finally, finally,
00:18:45.180 it's been a long, you know, long search through the swamp,
00:18:49.380 but I reached the promised land.
00:18:51.440 I survived Omicron, which was easy, right?
00:18:55.780 Now I've got natural immunity to the thing that's the one.
00:19:00.100 Yesterday, the day that I achieved my goal
00:19:04.920 of the ultimate immunity in the perfect timing,
00:19:11.160 we also learned that there's no such thing
00:19:14.280 as natural immunity for Omicron.
00:19:17.540 If you haven't heard that yet,
00:19:19.700 allow me to say, fuck you, fuck me, and fuck all of us.
00:19:24.340 Because that was the one thing that we were hoping for.
00:19:27.420 The one thing we hope for
00:19:30.100 is that if you get this fucking thing once, you're done.
00:19:35.120 Or maybe twice, and done.
00:19:37.840 But now, it turns out, yes, if you haven't heard this,
00:19:40.660 this is Bloomberg, I just tweeted it yesterday,
00:19:43.340 so you can see it in my Twitter feed.
00:19:45.160 So this is brand new.
00:19:47.100 Apparently, there are so many different Omicron variants
00:19:50.120 that getting one of them gives you no protection from its cousin.
00:19:54.360 And you're not likely to get the same one you got again.
00:19:59.380 I mean, you might have some protection from the one you got,
00:20:02.420 but there's so many out there, it's basically...
00:20:05.600 Wasn't it...
00:20:07.180 Was it Jimmy Kimmel who got Omicron twice this month?
00:20:12.340 He got it twice in three weeks?
00:20:14.420 And apparently, that's going to happen to all of us.
00:20:17.900 Apparently, you don't get much natural immunity now from Omicron.
00:20:21.920 There's too many of them.
00:20:22.700 Now, what are the odds that in the very day
00:20:27.020 that I recovered from the virus
00:20:29.560 and had my, you know, my dreamed-of, ultimate,
00:20:33.700 you know, I'm done with it, never have to think about it again immunity,
00:20:37.780 is the day they find out it's not real?
00:20:41.140 What were the odds of that, really?
00:20:43.340 I feel like the odds of that were low.
00:20:46.180 Yeah, monkeypox, up next.
00:20:48.620 Monkeypox.
00:20:49.020 All right, well, that's the current thing there.
00:20:53.840 The...
00:20:54.360 And then there's this story that, I guess it came out, you know,
00:21:00.180 when nobody's paying attention to the news,
00:21:03.300 that there's some hacking vulnerabilities to electronic voting machines.
00:21:09.320 Specifically, the ones that were tested.
00:21:13.140 It's not to say these are the only ones.
00:21:15.540 But the ones that they tested first were from a company called Dominion.
00:21:19.820 I don't know if you've heard that name in reference to voting machines.
00:21:23.980 But apparently, there were some vulnerabilities which could be exploited.
00:21:30.260 Now, I'm quick to say that there's no evidence
00:21:34.300 that any Dominion voting machines were, in fact, exploited.
00:21:41.280 All right, so that's not the claim.
00:21:43.200 Nobody's claiming they were exploited.
00:21:46.420 Indeed, no court has found that any major fraud happened in 2016.
00:21:52.500 None.
00:21:53.400 None of it was proven.
00:21:54.420 And as you know, if you look in the wrong place for something
00:21:59.960 and use the wrong sensor to find it, and you don't find it, it's not there.
00:22:07.080 That's what we've been taught, and that's what I believe.
00:22:10.580 And so, with the Dominion machines,
00:22:13.060 while there is no evidence whatsoever that anything untoward happened,
00:22:18.700 there are concerns.
00:22:20.300 There are concerns.
00:22:20.960 And there are at least, it seemed that some suggestion
00:22:27.840 that these were bad enough that a vote could have been changed.
00:22:32.540 But what we are not told is whether there would be any way
00:22:36.800 for a vote to be changed that we wouldn't know about
00:22:39.460 or be able to easily know about, I guess.
00:22:45.820 So, what I don't know is, would it be detectable?
00:22:49.580 Is there everything, is every possible thing you could do
00:22:53.900 to one of these vulnerabilities, are they all detectable?
00:22:59.720 Now, I think the company said that their current procedures
00:23:02.500 would have caught all of these problems.
00:23:06.800 And that might be true.
00:23:08.780 So, I actually also feel bad for the company.
00:23:13.280 So, let me give Dominion a little bit of support here.
00:23:18.140 I don't feel like their side of the argument got shown in this article at all.
00:23:24.220 So, I'm not so sure.
00:23:26.340 And this came from, was it AP or Reuters or something?
00:23:29.580 But I'd like to hear their side of the argument.
00:23:36.720 What is the worst vulnerability?
00:23:39.520 Maybe they can't tell us because it makes it even more dangerous.
00:23:43.120 But I'd love to know, what was the worst vulnerability?
00:23:46.760 And then if they say they have a procedure
00:23:48.860 that would have made that vulnerability not such a big deal anyway,
00:23:53.400 what was that procedure?
00:23:54.700 And if somebody had gotten past it, how would you know?
00:23:59.820 You know, there's just some basic questions like that.
00:24:02.060 But they might have good answers to that.
00:24:05.820 Right?
00:24:06.720 They might.
00:24:07.460 They might say, yeah, you know, I hear what you're saying,
00:24:11.300 but there's no way that could have happened and here's why.
00:24:15.360 Maybe.
00:24:16.220 Who knows?
00:24:16.700 I always thought that the big vulnerability in voting systems is the human beings.
00:24:22.560 Isn't it?
00:24:23.860 I feel like an insider could do sort of anything.
00:24:28.540 Maybe you need two insiders.
00:24:30.060 You know, it might not be possible with one.
00:24:32.820 But maybe you need two.
00:24:34.980 So, you know, I always thought that to imagine that any system is unhackable
00:24:40.260 is pretty unrealistic.
00:24:42.200 So, now we know that the voting machines are hypothetically less secure than one would want.
00:24:54.680 Well, in the surprising, non-surprising story of the day,
00:24:59.000 that Sussman attorney guy that was being charged in the Durham case
00:25:06.760 for lying to the FBI for saying that he was not working for Hillary Clinton, I guess,
00:25:12.200 when he brought the Russia collusion lies to the FBI.
00:25:19.680 And the spin that I'm seeing from, I don't even know if this is a spin, so that's unfair.
00:25:27.140 The narrative, let's say, I've seen on Fox News is that it was a D.C. jury
00:25:35.500 and they're all Democrats and Hillary Clinton supporters
00:25:38.940 and there was no way that Sussman was going to get convicted
00:25:42.760 even though the evidence was clearly shown that he lied.
00:25:48.680 Now, I don't know.
00:25:52.800 I'm having a little bit of trouble with that
00:25:55.860 because on one hand, I'm willing to believe that a D.C. jury
00:26:01.580 would always pardon a Democrat
00:26:05.220 or often enough that it could explain what's going on.
00:26:10.660 I mean, that's within the plausible range, I think.
00:26:16.420 It doesn't mean it's true, but it's within the plausible range.
00:26:19.120 The other possibility is that I've never once seen this story explained accurately.
00:26:26.600 How about that?
00:26:28.000 How about the reason that I'm surprised
00:26:30.020 is that I've never once seen the real news?
00:26:36.140 Right?
00:26:37.420 Why would you rule that out?
00:26:39.100 If you were surprised by the verdict,
00:26:41.920 why is it one of the possibilities
00:26:43.620 that you personally have never seen the real news?
00:26:46.000 And that if you saw the real news, you'd say,
00:26:48.620 oh, yeah, it's obvious he wasn't going to be convicted of this.
00:26:53.400 Because what the hell was the defense?
00:26:59.220 You know, didn't they have a defense?
00:27:01.600 The news I saw was that it's obvious he lied.
00:27:07.940 End of the story.
00:27:09.380 That's all I saw.
00:27:10.960 I never saw a defense.
00:27:13.380 The defense was, no, I didn't.
00:27:14.780 And I thought the evidence was pretty clear he did.
00:27:19.260 That's what I thought.
00:27:20.540 But does that mean I saw fake news
00:27:22.780 or that it was a fake jury?
00:27:26.460 Which is more likely?
00:27:28.360 It was a fake jury,
00:27:30.120 meaning they just didn't even follow the law,
00:27:33.580 or that the news that I watched,
00:27:35.520 and maybe some of you too,
00:27:37.100 was so fake
00:27:38.060 that we don't realize that the jury
00:27:40.580 had a perfectly good reason to acquit him?
00:27:42.400 What's more likely?
00:27:47.660 I feel it's more likely that it was fake news.
00:27:52.660 But it's probably a little of both.
00:27:54.500 Meaning that whatever the defense did
00:27:56.820 never got to my ears,
00:27:58.540 but I'd like to hear it.
00:27:59.680 So the defense probably put up
00:28:01.120 a reasonably good defense,
00:28:03.020 I have to think.
00:28:03.680 And I think that one of the facts
00:28:06.000 I hadn't heard before
00:28:06.940 is that the cab ride over
00:28:09.300 was billed not to Hillary Clinton.
00:28:13.000 The cab ride over to talk to the FBI.
00:28:15.560 And I'm like,
00:28:16.440 all right, well,
00:28:17.100 what does it take to get reasonable doubt?
00:28:20.740 You know,
00:28:21.160 it could be just one of those
00:28:22.220 reasonable doubt things
00:28:23.380 where the case
00:28:26.520 is based entirely upon
00:28:28.440 what somebody was thinking.
00:28:30.680 Is that it?
00:28:31.520 Because I think,
00:28:32.920 to be honest,
00:28:33.620 I think I could have gotten him off
00:28:35.020 on that
00:28:36.040 if it had been me.
00:28:37.920 I think if I had been the lawyer,
00:28:39.460 I think I could have gotten him off.
00:28:41.100 I'd say, you know,
00:28:41.840 it really just sort of depends
00:28:42.920 on what you think he was thinking.
00:28:44.820 That's not a standard
00:28:45.720 for convicting somebody.
00:28:48.320 Some version of that.
00:28:49.520 Maybe that's what it is.
00:28:52.460 All right.
00:28:53.240 So a lot of smart people
00:28:54.340 are saying that
00:28:55.020 it was probably a jury problem.
00:28:57.420 And I do not discount that.
00:28:59.360 But also don't discount
00:29:01.320 that there might have been
00:29:02.160 a defense
00:29:02.700 that you just didn't see.
00:29:08.140 And maybe it's just corruption.
00:29:09.980 I would say
00:29:10.580 that's a good possibility.
00:29:12.420 But if you thought
00:29:13.260 that a Democrat
00:29:13.860 would get caught red-handed
00:29:15.740 and then prosecuted,
00:29:18.440 it looks like that didn't happen.
00:29:21.320 Maybe the caught red-handed part.
00:29:24.800 But during...
00:29:25.520 Here's the amazing thing.
00:29:26.560 This is Fox reporting, too, I think.
00:29:31.680 During the course of the trial,
00:29:34.780 Robbie Mook,
00:29:35.660 who was the Clinton campaign manager,
00:29:37.740 he actually testified
00:29:38.800 that Hillary Clinton
00:29:39.840 approved disseminating
00:29:42.260 the unproven
00:29:43.060 and debunked information
00:29:45.260 to the media.
00:29:47.140 So we actually have
00:29:48.020 a court testimony
00:29:49.420 by Hillary Clinton's
00:29:51.100 campaign manager
00:29:51.940 that she literally
00:29:53.020 was the kingpin
00:29:53.960 for the Russia collusion
00:29:55.920 hoax,
00:29:57.660 the most dangerous hoax
00:29:59.120 ever perpetrated
00:30:01.320 on the American people,
00:30:03.140 except for her other hoaxes,
00:30:05.240 I guess.
00:30:08.060 And...
00:30:08.700 And somehow...
00:30:12.700 Somehow we're okay with that.
00:30:16.960 I guess we just go on.
00:30:18.660 Oh, well.
00:30:19.500 I guess we know that now.
00:30:20.720 So, CNN's...
00:30:23.860 The way they're handling it,
00:30:24.900 I thought was fascinating.
00:30:26.940 And...
00:30:27.720 I've said this before,
00:30:29.320 but...
00:30:30.280 CNN became
00:30:31.220 really entertaining again.
00:30:34.660 And it's because
00:30:35.480 I learned to read it differently.
00:30:37.880 Because now I read it for
00:30:39.500 what the official narrative
00:30:42.300 is trying to be.
00:30:43.820 Like, to watch them
00:30:44.840 try to turn a narrative.
00:30:45.940 I'm not really looking at them
00:30:46.880 for news anymore.
00:30:47.640 It's more about, like,
00:30:49.100 a peek behind the curtain
00:30:50.780 to find out
00:30:51.380 what the powers that be
00:30:52.260 you want.
00:30:53.920 But...
00:30:54.600 So Chris Silliza
00:30:55.740 is trying to...
00:30:58.160 trying to paint this
00:31:00.240 as
00:31:01.020 not a gigantic
00:31:03.420 travesty of justice,
00:31:05.400 the thing about
00:31:06.200 Sussman not being
00:31:07.180 convicted.
00:31:10.220 And...
00:31:10.700 So he writes
00:31:12.260 and CNN goes,
00:31:13.240 for years,
00:31:13.860 literally,
00:31:14.860 Donald Trump
00:31:15.340 has insisted
00:31:15.960 that Hillary Clinton
00:31:16.760 engaged in a purposeful
00:31:18.440 conspiracy
00:31:19.020 designed to keep him
00:31:19.980 out of the White House.
00:31:22.120 Right?
00:31:22.780 So he says this
00:31:23.840 like he's now
00:31:24.600 going to debunk this.
00:31:26.180 But that's the part
00:31:26.960 that was proven
00:31:28.020 to be true.
00:31:29.580 That's what...
00:31:30.640 Didn't Robbie Boock
00:31:31.600 testify that that was true?
00:31:34.040 That Hillary Clinton
00:31:35.080 did engage
00:31:35.800 in a purposeful
00:31:36.680 conspiracy
00:31:37.340 designed to keep him
00:31:38.260 out of the White House.
00:31:39.240 But the way
00:31:40.180 Silliza
00:31:40.840 sets it up,
00:31:43.220 it makes you think
00:31:44.040 that now he's going
00:31:44.940 to show you
00:31:45.360 that that was
00:31:45.840 proven not to be true.
00:31:48.000 And then he goes
00:31:48.920 to probe into it,
00:31:49.900 blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:31:53.000 And he goes,
00:31:53.820 on Tuesday,
00:31:54.480 Sussman was found
00:31:55.320 not guilty
00:31:55.880 of the lying charge,
00:31:57.720 blah, blah, blah.
00:31:58.700 So now,
00:31:59.680 he says,
00:32:00.340 the verdict is
00:32:00.940 a major defeat
00:32:01.680 for Durham
00:32:02.260 and is blah, blah, blah.
00:32:05.440 And it remains
00:32:06.640 to be seen
00:32:07.280 when blah, blah, blah.
00:32:08.860 And I'm thinking,
00:32:10.060 did he just tie together
00:32:11.440 two things
00:32:12.260 that weren't related?
00:32:14.560 So he starts out
00:32:15.660 by saying that
00:32:16.240 Trump made these claims
00:32:17.540 and then he says
00:32:19.180 that this one
00:32:20.920 specific set
00:32:21.720 of charges
00:32:22.360 against Sussman
00:32:23.420 didn't hold up.
00:32:25.720 But during the course
00:32:27.120 of the trial,
00:32:30.380 Trump was proven
00:32:32.340 correct, right?
00:32:33.600 Because Robbie Mook
00:32:34.780 confirmed exactly.
00:32:36.060 And didn't we learn
00:32:39.220 that the lawyer
00:32:40.040 did work for the campaign?
00:32:41.380 It's just not the lying
00:32:42.720 to the FBI part
00:32:43.820 that was the problem.
00:32:45.580 Apparently,
00:32:46.120 he got away with that.
00:32:48.100 So,
00:32:48.940 this is weird.
00:32:52.120 Like,
00:32:52.420 the amount of gaslighting
00:32:54.260 here is
00:32:55.900 so head-shaking
00:32:57.760 and so massive
00:32:59.140 that you don't know
00:33:00.920 what to do with it.
00:33:02.520 Like,
00:33:02.800 your brain can't
00:33:03.400 really process it.
00:33:04.240 It's too big of a,
00:33:05.140 it's too big
00:33:06.460 of a gaslight.
00:33:07.200 You just go,
00:33:07.860 I want to think
00:33:09.620 about something else now.
00:33:14.880 So,
00:33:15.440 apparently,
00:33:15.840 it's not a,
00:33:16.620 it's not any kind
00:33:17.860 of a crime
00:33:18.540 for Hillary Clinton
00:33:20.360 to have created
00:33:21.540 a hoax
00:33:22.340 about
00:33:23.660 Russia collusion
00:33:24.960 with a political
00:33:25.800 candidate
00:33:26.280 that could have
00:33:27.180 changed the course
00:33:28.280 of,
00:33:28.840 well,
00:33:29.100 probably did change
00:33:30.060 the course of
00:33:30.760 history.
00:33:32.280 Let me ask you this.
00:33:35.140 if the United States
00:33:36.960 had not been primed
00:33:38.220 by several years
00:33:39.980 of Hillary Clinton
00:33:40.880 lying about Russia
00:33:42.340 colluding with
00:33:43.560 Trump,
00:33:45.140 would we have
00:33:47.500 been backing Ukraine
00:33:48.660 as vigorously now?
00:33:50.260 Like,
00:33:50.460 it feels like
00:33:50.960 the United States
00:33:51.780 had been primed
00:33:54.000 for an anti-Russia
00:33:55.100 situation.
00:33:57.360 and then
00:33:58.600 an anti-Russia
00:33:59.360 situation,
00:34:00.220 hey,
00:34:01.100 guess what?
00:34:01.960 It came up.
00:34:03.600 So,
00:34:03.840 it feels like
00:34:04.520 we,
00:34:04.880 you know,
00:34:05.580 Hillary has been
00:34:07.300 involved in a long
00:34:09.140 game against Putin
00:34:10.320 and Putin's been
00:34:11.360 in a long game
00:34:12.200 against Hillary
00:34:12.860 and we're just
00:34:14.100 sort of the
00:34:14.880 innocent bystanders.
00:34:17.160 Like,
00:34:17.380 we're just
00:34:18.040 drive-by victims
00:34:19.440 as they're strafing
00:34:20.940 each other
00:34:21.400 every few years.
00:34:22.500 But,
00:34:25.400 suppose,
00:34:26.780 suppose it was
00:34:28.580 a crime
00:34:29.080 for somebody
00:34:30.440 like Hillary
00:34:31.500 Clinton
00:34:31.880 to come up
00:34:33.120 with a
00:34:33.760 completely fake
00:34:34.960 hoax
00:34:36.080 and try to
00:34:36.760 sell it
00:34:37.100 to the FBI
00:34:37.740 and,
00:34:39.020 it'd be one thing
00:34:39.760 to just say it
00:34:40.420 on TV.
00:34:42.340 You expect
00:34:43.300 your politicians
00:34:43.960 to lie,
00:34:44.860 but to actually
00:34:45.540 get law enforcement
00:34:46.880 involved
00:34:47.520 to take down
00:34:49.140 a president,
00:34:49.700 what should be
00:34:51.640 the penalty
00:34:52.180 for that
00:34:52.740 if that were
00:34:53.400 a crime?
00:34:53.920 It's not,
00:34:54.500 apparently.
00:34:55.460 Apparently,
00:34:55.940 that's completely
00:34:56.640 legal.
00:34:58.540 But what should
00:34:59.280 be the penalty
00:34:59.860 if it were
00:35:00.580 a crime?
00:35:02.280 Well,
00:35:02.700 I did a little
00:35:03.320 Twitter poll.
00:35:04.100 20% said death.
00:35:05.980 21% said life
00:35:07.300 in prison.
00:35:08.580 10 years in prison
00:35:09.620 was the most
00:35:10.120 popular one,
00:35:10.680 56%.
00:35:11.640 So,
00:35:12.680 basically,
00:35:13.460 we've got
00:35:13.940 the woman
00:35:16.940 who would
00:35:17.720 have run
00:35:18.320 or would
00:35:20.780 have been
00:35:21.020 the president
00:35:21.680 if not
00:35:22.160 for Trump.
00:35:23.660 And 56%
00:35:25.420 think she
00:35:26.020 should have
00:35:26.400 gone to prison
00:35:27.360 for 10 years
00:35:28.020 for the way
00:35:28.420 she handled
00:35:28.840 the election.
00:35:30.300 At least
00:35:30.620 people answered
00:35:31.260 my poll.
00:35:31.840 Not exactly
00:35:32.440 a scientific
00:35:32.940 poll.
00:35:38.080 So,
00:35:39.060 I guess
00:35:39.500 the Biden
00:35:40.760 administration
00:35:41.240 is now
00:35:41.900 clarifying
00:35:42.580 that they
00:35:43.100 do not
00:35:43.520 wish to
00:35:44.160 remove
00:35:44.920 Putin
00:35:45.300 from power.
00:35:47.520 Indeed,
00:35:48.320 rather than
00:35:49.780 thwart
00:35:50.360 Putin's
00:35:50.920 ambitions
00:35:51.360 and remove
00:35:52.020 him from
00:35:52.340 power,
00:35:53.220 the new
00:35:53.780 plan is
00:35:54.280 to give
00:35:54.700 him a
00:35:55.500 large part
00:35:56.040 of Ukraine,
00:35:56.960 the valuable
00:35:57.660 parts.
00:35:59.500 So,
00:36:01.180 not exactly
00:36:02.900 a success.
00:36:05.720 And
00:36:06.120 Biden said,
00:36:07.740 we do not
00:36:08.220 seek a war
00:36:08.780 between NATO
00:36:09.440 and Russia,
00:36:10.140 Biden wrote.
00:36:11.500 As much
00:36:12.000 as I
00:36:12.460 disagree
00:36:12.980 with Mr.
00:36:13.520 Putin
00:36:13.740 and find
00:36:14.780 his actions
00:36:15.360 in outrage,
00:36:16.460 the United
00:36:16.880 States will
00:36:17.420 not try
00:36:17.840 to bring
00:36:18.160 about his
00:36:18.700 ouster in
00:36:19.420 Moscow.
00:36:20.940 Do you
00:36:21.620 know what
00:36:21.940 feels like
00:36:22.700 happened?
00:36:24.440 Now,
00:36:25.280 I'm going
00:36:25.640 to go full
00:36:26.260 conspiracy
00:36:26.980 theory here,
00:36:28.900 but sort
00:36:29.680 of Eisenhower
00:36:30.480 style,
00:36:31.460 meaning,
00:36:32.300 not really.
00:36:34.560 Doesn't it
00:36:35.100 feel as if
00:36:35.700 the military
00:36:37.040 industrial
00:36:37.540 complex just
00:36:39.200 needed something
00:36:40.000 to replace
00:36:40.800 Middle
00:36:42.300 Eastern wars
00:36:43.140 in Afghanistan
00:36:44.880 and they
00:36:46.180 knew that
00:36:47.260 we had
00:36:47.540 all of
00:36:47.920 this
00:36:48.160 old
00:36:48.720 equipment
00:36:49.200 that
00:36:50.080 needed
00:36:50.340 to be
00:36:50.720 used
00:36:51.000 up
00:36:51.260 before
00:36:51.600 anybody
00:36:52.760 buys
00:36:53.120 new
00:36:53.380 stuff
00:36:53.740 and
00:36:54.920 that
00:36:55.300 the
00:36:56.980 entire
00:36:57.340 Ukraine
00:36:57.800 war
00:36:58.060 was
00:36:58.280 orchestrated
00:36:58.860 by the
00:36:59.380 industrial
00:36:59.840 military
00:37:00.400 complex
00:37:01.020 and it
00:37:02.060 was about
00:37:02.780 nothing but
00:37:03.460 moving
00:37:03.780 inventory
00:37:04.300 and that
00:37:06.020 the reason
00:37:06.640 that Biden
00:37:07.120 has now
00:37:07.640 pivoted to,
00:37:08.340 well,
00:37:08.980 maybe we
00:37:09.380 can work
00:37:09.780 with this
00:37:10.220 Putin guy
00:37:10.920 is because
00:37:12.180 the
00:37:13.660 military
00:37:14.600 industrial
00:37:15.100 complex
00:37:15.740 literally
00:37:16.440 can't make
00:37:17.420 any weapons
00:37:18.160 faster than
00:37:19.020 they already
00:37:19.480 are.
00:37:21.440 Meaning,
00:37:22.700 they don't
00:37:23.180 need any
00:37:23.660 extra war
00:37:24.300 now.
00:37:25.260 We have
00:37:25.600 just the
00:37:26.180 right amount
00:37:26.560 of conflict
00:37:27.220 because all
00:37:28.340 of the
00:37:28.720 weapons
00:37:29.340 makers
00:37:30.400 are cranking
00:37:31.980 out weapons
00:37:32.560 as fast
00:37:33.040 as they can
00:37:33.500 to replace
00:37:34.080 the stockpiles
00:37:34.900 of stuff
00:37:35.340 that went
00:37:35.820 to Ukraine.
00:37:37.060 Is it a
00:37:38.620 fucking
00:37:38.980 coincidence
00:37:39.640 that the
00:37:40.840 real world
00:37:41.600 happens to
00:37:42.320 correspond
00:37:42.720 exactly
00:37:43.640 to what
00:37:44.600 one could
00:37:45.100 imagine
00:37:45.520 would be
00:37:45.920 the best
00:37:46.400 interests
00:37:46.840 of a
00:37:47.360 specific
00:37:47.800 industry?
00:37:49.320 How is
00:37:50.140 that a
00:37:50.520 coincidence?
00:37:53.200 So,
00:37:53.960 if you
00:37:54.520 wanted to
00:37:54.920 follow the
00:37:55.460 money,
00:37:56.660 I would
00:37:56.920 say,
00:37:57.960 look at
00:37:58.380 whether
00:37:58.660 our
00:37:59.220 weapons
00:38:01.680 makers
00:38:02.160 are operating
00:38:03.240 at capacity.
00:38:04.640 If they're
00:38:05.260 making
00:38:05.660 drones and
00:38:06.560 missiles
00:38:06.860 and replacement
00:38:07.860 tanks and
00:38:08.560 everything else
00:38:09.180 and handheld
00:38:10.660 missiles,
00:38:12.320 what do you
00:38:12.760 call it,
00:38:13.100 the shoulder
00:38:13.460 mounted stuff,
00:38:14.260 if we're
00:38:14.660 making that
00:38:15.080 as fast
00:38:15.700 as we
00:38:16.060 can so
00:38:17.620 that there
00:38:18.080 would be
00:38:18.340 no benefit
00:38:18.980 of having
00:38:19.520 any extra
00:38:20.160 conflict,
00:38:21.140 you should
00:38:21.740 expect that
00:38:22.300 we'll negotiate
00:38:22.920 some kind
00:38:23.420 of a deal.
00:38:25.400 That's where
00:38:26.020 the money
00:38:26.340 says we're
00:38:26.840 going.
00:38:28.400 So,
00:38:30.100 let me
00:38:32.440 summarize
00:38:32.760 this.
00:38:33.240 there are
00:38:35.860 two things
00:38:36.360 we learned
00:38:38.500 this month.
00:38:41.320 One is
00:38:42.040 that everything
00:38:42.520 you suspected
00:38:43.300 was true.
00:38:45.980 Everything
00:38:46.660 you suspected
00:38:47.520 was true.
00:38:49.500 Hillary Clinton
00:38:50.440 was behind
00:38:52.700 the Russia
00:38:53.600 collusion
00:38:54.020 hoax.
00:38:55.140 Voting
00:38:55.760 machines
00:38:56.420 are
00:38:58.080 vulnerable,
00:39:00.020 as you
00:39:00.460 suspected.
00:39:00.940 transitory
00:39:02.460 inflation
00:39:02.940 was always
00:39:03.580 a lie.
00:39:04.540 It was
00:39:04.760 always a
00:39:05.180 lie.
00:39:07.780 Mask
00:39:08.340 mandates
00:39:08.880 don't
00:39:09.640 work.
00:39:12.680 And
00:39:13.240 the
00:39:14.280 Biden
00:39:14.480 family
00:39:14.900 are
00:39:15.240 crooks.
00:39:16.960 All the
00:39:17.560 things you
00:39:17.960 thought were
00:39:18.440 true
00:39:18.780 have
00:39:20.040 actually
00:39:20.420 been
00:39:20.880 shown
00:39:21.520 to be
00:39:21.860 true.
00:39:22.760 So,
00:39:22.920 that's
00:39:23.100 number
00:39:23.360 one.
00:39:23.700 That's
00:39:23.900 the first
00:39:24.240 thing
00:39:24.420 you've
00:39:24.620 learned.
00:39:25.020 Everything
00:39:25.260 you
00:39:25.520 suspected
00:39:25.980 was
00:39:26.280 true.
00:39:27.740 Weird.
00:39:29.360 And
00:39:29.560 number
00:39:29.760 two,
00:39:30.060 no one
00:39:31.120 will be
00:39:31.460 held
00:39:31.680 responsible.
00:39:34.520 Everything
00:39:35.120 you
00:39:35.400 suspected
00:39:35.920 was
00:39:36.260 true.
00:39:37.680 No
00:39:38.060 one
00:39:38.240 will
00:39:38.420 be
00:39:38.580 held
00:39:38.780 responsible.
00:39:40.140 None
00:39:40.420 of
00:39:40.540 these
00:39:40.700 stories
00:39:41.020 have
00:39:41.220 anybody
00:39:41.560 going
00:39:42.400 to
00:39:42.620 jail.
00:39:44.120 Right?
00:39:45.640 Who's
00:39:46.320 going to
00:39:47.120 lose a
00:39:47.640 job?
00:39:49.560 Anything.
00:39:51.520 Who
00:39:52.160 lost an
00:39:52.720 election,
00:39:53.160 lost a
00:39:53.540 job,
00:39:54.860 went to
00:39:55.280 jail,
00:39:56.240 paid a
00:39:56.580 ticket?
00:39:57.560 Anything.
00:39:58.840 Every one
00:39:59.320 of those
00:39:59.600 things that
00:39:59.940 you
00:40:00.040 thought
00:40:00.340 maybe
00:40:01.040 were
00:40:01.300 true,
00:40:01.660 were
00:40:01.760 true.
00:40:04.640 Now,
00:40:05.380 that doesn't
00:40:06.340 mean that
00:40:06.700 the 2016
00:40:07.420 election was
00:40:08.560 rigged.
00:40:09.000 That's a
00:40:09.660 different topic.
00:40:10.580 I'm not
00:40:10.900 saying that.
00:40:12.460 I'm saying
00:40:13.140 that anything
00:40:13.560 that can be
00:40:14.180 rigged will
00:40:14.660 be rigged.
00:40:16.080 You just
00:40:16.500 don't know
00:40:16.920 if it's
00:40:17.180 happened yet.
00:40:19.340 So,
00:40:20.060 we do
00:40:20.860 know that
00:40:21.660 if these
00:40:22.040 vulnerabilities
00:40:22.500 were the
00:40:23.140 kind that
00:40:23.440 could actually
00:40:23.800 change
00:40:24.160 elections,
00:40:25.240 I'm not
00:40:25.840 sure that's
00:40:26.220 true.
00:40:26.420 But if
00:40:27.520 that's
00:40:27.760 true,
00:40:28.200 that they
00:40:28.520 were that
00:40:29.060 kind of
00:40:29.420 vulnerabilities,
00:40:30.420 and they
00:40:31.080 had persisted,
00:40:32.680 somebody would
00:40:33.700 have rigged
00:40:34.340 an election
00:40:34.780 eventually,
00:40:35.720 probably.
00:40:36.820 You just
00:40:37.240 have to
00:40:37.480 wait for
00:40:37.800 it.
00:40:38.440 We just
00:40:39.080 don't know
00:40:39.620 if it
00:40:39.900 happened
00:40:40.220 already.
00:40:44.460 And can
00:40:45.240 we get a
00:40:45.780 Johnny Depp
00:40:46.340 verdict today?
00:40:47.440 Please.
00:40:48.480 Can we?
00:40:48.940 You keep
00:40:55.560 saying
00:40:56.020 2016?
00:40:59.420 Oh,
00:40:59.960 I'm sorry.
00:41:00.840 2020,
00:41:01.500 yes.
00:41:02.380 2020
00:41:02.820 election.
00:41:03.540 We don't
00:41:03.920 know about
00:41:04.240 the 2020
00:41:04.680 election.
00:41:12.380 Yeah,
00:41:12.920 we need
00:41:13.220 a Johnny
00:41:13.720 Depp
00:41:14.080 verdict to
00:41:15.200 entertain
00:41:15.620 us.
00:41:16.560 Well,
00:41:17.000 ladies and
00:41:17.400 gentlemen,
00:41:18.940 that concludes
00:41:21.100 the live
00:41:21.700 stream.
00:41:22.640 And I
00:41:24.440 think you
00:41:24.860 would probably
00:41:25.240 agree that
00:41:27.000 the long
00:41:27.480 COVID made
00:41:28.260 this a
00:41:28.620 better show
00:41:29.080 than normal.
00:41:30.260 Right?
00:41:31.100 A little bit
00:41:31.680 better.
00:41:32.680 And you
00:41:34.160 should start
00:41:34.640 looking out
00:41:35.100 for the
00:41:35.540 little super
00:41:36.240 powers you're
00:41:36.860 going to get
00:41:37.320 to.
00:41:38.180 Maybe you'll
00:41:38.740 get a little
00:41:39.080 better rest,
00:41:41.040 concentrate
00:41:41.460 better,
00:41:42.820 might have a
00:41:43.260 little bit
00:41:43.520 more energy
00:41:44.100 for exercising.
00:41:45.040 I'll bet
00:41:46.180 you'll even
00:41:46.620 die a
00:41:47.140 better.
00:41:48.480 Let that
00:41:49.060 long COVID
00:41:49.780 work for
00:41:50.760 you.
00:41:52.520 All right.
00:41:53.700 Get those
00:41:54.760 good mutations
00:41:55.520 working for
00:41:56.280 you.
00:41:58.100 And
00:41:58.440 and
00:42:04.060 and
00:42:07.260 that's
00:42:08.300 enough for
00:42:08.600 today.
00:42:09.540 Goodbye,
00:42:09.900 YouTube.
00:42:15.040 Bye.