Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1761 Scott Adams： Well, It Turns Out Everything You Suspected Was True. Let's Talk About It

00:00:00.000 Ba-ba-ba, ba-ba-da-da-da-da-da.

00:00:05.540 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization.

00:00:11.780 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and may I say that this will be the best one of all time.

00:00:18.560 We're going to do the simultaneous sip first, and then let me tell you, it's going to go skyrocketing after that.

00:00:26.500 Skyrocketing, I tell you, never better.

00:00:28.640 And all you need to get this going is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:37.040 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:39.820 I like coffee.

00:00:41.460 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine to the day, the thing that puts a tingle on the back of your neck.

00:00:50.980 It's called the simultaneous sip, and a lot of simultaneous things are going to happen right now.

00:00:56.360 Go.

00:00:58.640 Yeah, that was perfect, actually.

00:01:07.860 So here's an update on my COVID quarantine situation.

00:01:12.160 Update, update.

00:01:13.080 Let's see.

00:01:17.040 So Saturday was my first symptoms, and I tested positive with the home test.

00:01:22.000 Today is Wednesday.

00:01:25.400 And I feel not just 100% better, but better than I've ever been.

00:01:32.780 And here's why.

00:01:35.500 I realized the other day, because I had a little online side conversation, that some part of long COVID could be confirmation bias.

00:01:46.720 Right?

00:01:47.060 You think you're going to have these lasting symptoms, then anything that ever happens to you for the next 10 years, you say, well, it's because of the COVID.

00:01:58.960 Am I right?

00:01:59.520 You're basically going to imagine yourself into every symptom you were going to have anyway, being long COVID.

00:02:07.140 Now, knowing that that's the case, what would be the defense?

00:02:11.260 And I've employed what I call the Spider-Man reframe.

00:02:16.120 Now, I don't know if this will work yet, but it seems to be working so far.

00:02:20.740 And the Spider-Man reframe goes like this.

00:02:25.540 Not every mutation is bad.

00:02:29.240 Sometimes it's a superpower.

00:02:31.540 And so instead of looking for whatever, you know, negative health consequences I might have in the future and saying, well, I think there's my long COVID kicking in.

00:02:40.180 I'm going to look for anything that looks like things are going a little extra well for me.

00:02:45.240 And I'm going to say, I think that's from the COVID.

00:02:48.640 For example, just today, I was thinking, is it just me or do I look a little extra sexy today?

00:02:57.060 And I thought, it's not my imagination.

00:03:01.660 It's the long COVID.

00:03:03.840 It's starting to kick in with some benefits.

00:03:06.820 That's the first one.

00:03:07.900 I mean, that's the obvious one.

00:03:09.100 Probably a lot of you noticed as soon as you signed on.

00:03:11.780 You're thinking, what is it?

00:03:13.240 Why is he a little bit sexier?

00:03:15.360 Did something happen?

00:03:16.540 Yeah, yeah.

00:03:17.300 It's called long COVID, Spider-Man edition.

00:03:22.020 Superpowers.

00:03:23.360 Now, you're also saying, why is he funnier?

00:03:25.460 Why is this a better show today?

00:03:27.400 Same reason.

00:03:28.960 Same reason.

00:03:30.300 Long COVID, Spider-Man edition.

00:03:33.020 Now, some people are going to get the, you know, the low energy and the, I don't know, all kinds of bad things, supposedly.

00:03:40.240 And they are not framing this right.

00:03:43.800 They're creating the wrong future for themselves in this simulation.

00:03:47.740 So, if, as we go on, it seems to you that I'm smarter, better adjusted, happier, or any of those things, it's not your imagination.

00:04:00.360 That's the long COVID.

00:04:02.740 Kick it in.

00:04:04.160 Spider-Man edition.

00:04:05.140 All right.

00:04:06.960 All right.

00:04:08.860 Have you noticed that whoever it is that's in control of the truth would love to also limit hate speech?

00:04:17.780 That's a dangerous combination, isn't it?

00:04:21.600 Because if I just said to you, hey, maybe we should have less hate speech, and that's the only variable, yeah, less hate speech.

00:04:30.880 That's good.

00:04:31.740 Your first instinct might be, hey, I'd like a little less hate speech.

00:04:35.700 But what if somebody else is in charge of deciding what that hate speech is?

00:04:44.120 Well, then suddenly it's the worst thing in the world.

00:04:48.240 So, Rasmussen did a little poll here and said, found out that 58% of Democrats say the federal government should take action to suppress online hate speech.

00:04:59.860 But that view is shared by only 31% of Republicans and voters not affiliated with either major party.

00:05:10.020 So, 58% of Democrats want the federal government to do more about hate speech.

00:05:18.940 Now, Democrats are also the ones who sort of are in charge of the government, or a lot of it.

00:05:26.920 So, wouldn't this be the worst thing in the world?

00:05:30.860 You just can't have these two things at the same time.

00:05:35.000 Well, maybe you just need free speech, and that's the end of that conversation.

00:05:43.340 And also, I saw a tweet by the Rasmussen account, which you should be following, Rasmussen Reports.

00:05:55.280 And this was Abe Lincoln, right?

00:05:58.940 This quote.

00:05:59.860 You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

00:06:08.320 And I thought to myself, that needs to be updated a little bit.

00:06:11.980 See if you can tell what's missing.

00:06:13.220 It was probably pretty clever back when Lincoln said it, and I imagine if I'd been there, I would have said, whoa, well said, well said, Abe.

00:06:24.640 If I had been there at the time.

00:06:26.020 But it doesn't age well.

00:06:29.280 It didn't age well.

00:06:30.360 I'll tell you why.

00:06:31.160 So, I'll give it to you again, see if you can hear it.

00:06:33.760 What is missing from this?

00:06:36.620 Quote, you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

00:06:44.700 Well, I'll tell you what's missing.

00:06:45.720 That's the most important part, which matters today.

00:06:50.060 You only need to fool half of the people all the time.

00:06:53.060 And that's kind of easy.

00:06:57.540 You only need to fool half the people.

00:07:01.520 And unfortunately, you can do that all the time.

00:07:07.160 We just won't agree which half it is.

00:07:10.400 I'm pretty sure it's the half I'm not in.

00:07:14.560 Can we take a vote?

00:07:16.900 I feel it like this is something we can agree on.

00:07:19.520 And although we all have completely different opinions all over the board, can we agree that the half that's wrong is the half that we're not in?

00:07:29.620 Everybody, can we agree on that?

00:07:31.460 Right?

00:07:32.240 Am I right?

00:07:32.800 Yeah.

00:07:33.400 It's the other people.

00:07:36.260 If I were to write an essay on what is the one problem that's with this country, and maybe, yay, the world.

00:07:47.080 The big problem, it's other people.

00:07:51.740 It's other people.

00:07:53.880 Present company excluded, obviously.

00:07:56.700 You're pretty awesome.

00:07:58.600 You're pretty awesome, and I know I am.

00:08:01.040 So, it's really other people.

00:08:03.620 Other people.

00:08:05.320 Now, I know they think the same thing, but the difference is they're wrong.

00:08:10.280 That's how other people are.

00:08:13.240 No wonder people don't like other people.

00:08:15.700 If you think about how other people act, well, it's just natural.

00:08:23.180 Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary, she admits that maybe she was wrong about this whole inflation thing.

00:08:32.320 So, I thought it was a little bit more transitory than it was.

00:08:35.900 I just love the fact that her last name is Yellen.

00:08:42.500 Y-E-L-L-E-N. 1.00

00:08:46.960 Do you think that caused her to have to modify her behavior at all at any point in her life?

00:08:52.160 I don't know if that's her born name or if that's a married name.

00:08:56.120 But I hate to be a woman in a powerful position and have the last name of Yellen.

00:09:03.800 I wasn't even thinking of old Yellen.

00:09:16.060 Okay, that's a funny reference.

00:09:19.220 But I was just thinking, you know, don't women always say,

00:09:23.520 I don't have personal experience here, but correct me if I'm wrong,

00:09:26.880 but don't women always say that, you know, they're judged more harshly if they're tough in business? 1.00

00:09:34.800 And here's Janet Yellen. 0.75

00:09:36.000 She's at the top of her game in business, Treasury Secretary, doing pretty well.

00:09:42.460 And her last name is Yellen. 0.93

00:09:44.880 Yellen, I wonder if she had to be extra soft and she still scared people. 1.00

00:09:52.700 Like, you've been called to the boss's office.

00:09:57.420 The boss? Yellen?

00:09:59.900 Well, I don't know if she'll be Yellen.

00:10:01.700 No, I mean, that's her name.

00:10:03.180 Yeah.

00:10:04.740 I mean, she just sounds scary.

00:10:06.780 I wouldn't want to go to a boss's office if her name was Yellen. 1.00

00:10:10.660 Anyway, she says that she was wrong about this inflation thing.

00:10:15.160 How many of you think she was wrong and how many of you think she was lying and knew it?

00:10:20.800 I guess you'd have to know it if you were lying.

00:10:23.360 How many think she was lying in the comments?

00:10:26.360 Comments?

00:10:28.000 Oh, you skeptics.

00:10:30.300 Oh, you disbelievers. 1.00

00:10:32.660 Why do you distrust government officials so?

00:10:37.280 Oh, oh, I'm so disappointed in all of you.

00:10:40.780 For being so distrustful.

00:10:42.320 Okay, yes.

00:10:44.360 I'm going to say that we can't read minds.

00:10:50.420 Right?

00:10:51.380 Can't read minds.

00:10:53.540 I will allow.

00:10:54.600 I will allow.

00:10:57.200 That's possible she's not lying.

00:11:00.180 Because the other possibility is that she's confessing that she's thoroughly incompetent at her job.

00:11:06.840 And I think we should at least give her that benefit of a doubt.

00:11:11.180 If she's saying, no, I'm not lying, I'm just really, really bad at my job and should never be in this position, maybe we should believe her.

00:11:22.360 No, I'm just kidding.

00:11:23.640 I'm kidding.

00:11:24.260 She lied.

00:11:24.740 But we guess.

00:11:27.060 We don't know.

00:11:28.520 But it kind of looks like it, doesn't it?

00:11:31.820 New York Times had an article.

00:11:34.400 Now, the important part about this is that it's the New York Times.

00:11:39.140 So New York Times is the paper of record, blah, blah, blah.

00:11:42.960 So if they say it, it's supposed to be true.

00:11:44.880 So I'm not going to get into an argument too much about what's true or not.

00:11:49.520 Yeah, I am a little bit.

00:11:50.900 Okay.

00:11:51.540 I'm lying.

00:11:54.060 So New York Times had an article that says basically that what we know now is that masks do work, but mandates don't.

00:12:03.640 Meaning that masks work, except that when you wear them, they don't do anything that you hoped would happen when you wear them.

00:12:12.700 But they work.

00:12:14.880 But they work.

00:12:17.500 Now, I'm wondering if this is sort of the difference between the engineer and the politician or something.

00:12:25.180 You know, two views of the world.

00:12:27.040 Let me ask you a question to see where your brain is at, all right?

00:12:30.660 If you took a screen off a screen door, and then you took a bucket of water, and you poured it through the screen,

00:12:39.620 would the screen door, you know, an actual screen from your door, would it stop the water?

00:12:48.720 Let's say that was your intention, was to stop the water.

00:12:54.660 Would it do it?

00:12:56.740 What do you say?

00:12:57.500 Some say no.

00:13:02.920 Some say stop.

00:13:04.000 Some?

00:13:04.440 What do you mean some?

00:13:05.720 The thing's full of holes.

00:13:08.040 Why only some?

00:13:09.760 Some say it slows it down.

00:13:11.240 Well, so, I guess it depends how much of an engineer you are.

00:13:18.980 And I mean that in the best possible sense, because I always have the highest regard for the way engineers think.

00:13:27.600 More so than scientists in many ways.

00:13:30.420 Because it's more the practical way of thinking.

00:13:34.980 And here's how I think of it.

00:13:37.880 When I imagine pouring water through a screen, if you can touch the screen right after you poured the water,

00:13:45.040 and it's still wet, it did something.

00:13:48.900 But if you could argue that it worked, or that you should put screens on your roof instead of shingles,

00:13:54.960 that's sort of a bad argument.

00:13:56.780 So, things may technically slow things down.

00:13:59.760 So, I think when they did studies that say masks work,

00:14:04.340 it did create some friction, but not enough to make a difference.

00:14:08.360 And then the article hypothesizes that it's because people were bad at wearing their masks.

00:14:15.780 Here's what I think.

00:14:17.880 Nobody socially distanced at home.

00:14:21.740 Maybe that's the whole thing.

00:14:23.680 Maybe it doesn't matter what you say about masks.

00:14:27.620 If people go home and just take them off and do whatever the hell they want to do.

00:14:33.340 Especially with their neighbors and their friends.

00:14:35.620 Because I think there was such massive non-social distancing

00:14:40.140 that there's nothing you could have done with masks that you would have noticed in the data.

00:14:47.060 But at least the New York Times has said that you can't...

00:14:51.700 It's not obvious in the data.

00:14:54.240 Now, as Andres Backhouse points out,

00:14:56.700 that's not the standard for knowing if something worked.

00:15:02.160 You can't just sort of look at two places or even two things that you think are similar

00:15:07.240 in different periods of time.

00:15:09.000 You're never really comparing the right stuff.

00:15:12.460 So, you can never really be sure.

00:15:14.100 And there are too many variables in there, etc.

00:15:15.700 But, if you're making a social policy that's affecting a lot of people,

00:15:21.780 like in a really fundamental way,

00:15:23.980 and there's not enough of a positive impact that you can even identify it,

00:15:29.240 that's a good enough reason not to do it.

00:15:32.680 Because freedom has to be the tiebreaker, right?

00:15:35.980 If you can't tell if it makes a difference overall,

00:15:40.080 you have to go with freedom.

00:15:42.500 To me, that seems like a no-brainer.

00:15:44.420 Anyway, so I think you could say that masks worked in some minor way

00:15:50.680 that didn't matter to the pandemic.

00:15:56.600 How about this for timing?

00:16:00.520 You know, do you ever think that you live in a simulation

00:16:02.520 and it's designed just to F with you, personally?

00:16:07.260 Here was my situation.

00:16:10.820 For about three years now, or whatever it's been,

00:16:13.540 I've been trying to surf this pandemic and play it right.

00:16:19.340 So, early on, when it was the fog of war,

00:16:23.180 I went into maximum caution.

00:16:26.660 I never washed my groceries.

00:16:30.800 So, I was never worried about surfaces too much.

00:16:33.600 Well, maybe in the first week or so I was.

00:16:35.820 But, you know, the fog of war, I played it that way.

00:16:40.740 And I go, okay, good.

00:16:42.620 Even though I, you know, over, I exaggerated the risk in my mind,

00:16:47.420 I didn't get the virus.

00:16:50.120 And it was, you know, just a few weeks, no big deal.

00:16:53.380 But then as we learned, you know, more and more about it,

00:16:55.980 I thought, okay, my best bet is to let other people get the vaccination first 0.99

00:16:59.820 and I'd wait as long as I can without getting the virus

00:17:04.480 before I get the vaccination, before I even decide.

00:17:08.300 And then I decided I wanted it because I wanted to travel, basically.

00:17:12.180 Now, getting the vaccination in my case never made any difference,

00:17:17.540 as far as I can tell.

00:17:19.240 In other words, I believe I got a vaccination.

00:17:21.620 They gave me a risk of a vaccination, however small.

00:17:24.960 I don't know what size it is.

00:17:27.340 But I can tell at this point, because I actually didn't contract it

00:17:31.620 and it's unlikely that the vaccination would have stopped me from contracting it,

00:17:35.560 that I got the, that I took the risk of the vaccination.

00:17:39.840 But now I know that it didn't benefit me.

00:17:42.820 It doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

00:17:45.320 It just means that when you buy insurance, you don't always catch on fire.

00:17:49.660 So if you think of it as an insurance policy, it wasn't wrong.

00:17:53.140 It just, now we know how it turned down.

00:17:57.900 Yeah, and it was my choice.

00:17:59.480 It was my choice.

00:18:00.420 That was key.

00:18:01.600 As somebody says, the key thing here is it was my choice the whole time.

00:18:05.020 Then I decided to not get the second set of boosters.

00:18:09.100 So I got the first two, the pair.

00:18:11.720 And I said to myself, oh, now this Omicron's coming along.

00:18:16.120 Now with the Omicron, once I get that,

00:18:19.820 because I probably will, everybody will,

00:18:22.460 then I've got the Omicron immunity.

00:18:25.600 The Delta and the Alpha are behind us, I think.

00:18:30.340 And then I've got all my Omicron immunity.

00:18:33.680 It's better than having even a vaccination,

00:18:36.380 because apparently the vaccination doesn't do much for Omicron.

00:18:38.800 And like, just yesterday, I said to myself, finally, finally,

00:18:45.180 it's been a long, you know, long search through the swamp,

00:18:49.380 but I reached the promised land.

00:18:51.440 I survived Omicron, which was easy, right?

00:18:55.780 Now I've got natural immunity to the thing that's the one.

00:19:00.100 Yesterday, the day that I achieved my goal

00:19:04.920 of the ultimate immunity in the perfect timing,

00:19:11.160 we also learned that there's no such thing

00:19:14.280 as natural immunity for Omicron.

00:19:17.540 If you haven't heard that yet,

00:19:19.700 allow me to say, fuck you, fuck me, and fuck all of us. 1.00

00:19:24.340 Because that was the one thing that we were hoping for.

00:19:27.420 The one thing we hope for

00:19:30.100 is that if you get this fucking thing once, you're done. 0.98

00:19:35.120 Or maybe twice, and done.

00:19:37.840 But now, it turns out, yes, if you haven't heard this,

00:19:40.660 this is Bloomberg, I just tweeted it yesterday,

00:19:43.340 so you can see it in my Twitter feed.

00:19:45.160 So this is brand new.

00:19:47.100 Apparently, there are so many different Omicron variants

00:19:50.120 that getting one of them gives you no protection from its cousin.

00:19:54.360 And you're not likely to get the same one you got again.

00:19:59.380 I mean, you might have some protection from the one you got,

00:20:02.420 but there's so many out there, it's basically...

00:20:05.600 Wasn't it...

00:20:07.180 Was it Jimmy Kimmel who got Omicron twice this month?

00:20:12.340 He got it twice in three weeks?

00:20:14.420 And apparently, that's going to happen to all of us.

00:20:17.900 Apparently, you don't get much natural immunity now from Omicron.

00:20:21.920 There's too many of them.

00:20:22.700 Now, what are the odds that in the very day

00:20:27.020 that I recovered from the virus

00:20:29.560 and had my, you know, my dreamed-of, ultimate,

00:20:33.700 you know, I'm done with it, never have to think about it again immunity,

00:20:37.780 is the day they find out it's not real?

00:20:41.140 What were the odds of that, really?

00:20:43.340 I feel like the odds of that were low.

00:20:46.180 Yeah, monkeypox, up next.

00:20:48.620 Monkeypox.

00:20:49.020 All right, well, that's the current thing there.

00:20:53.840 The...

00:20:54.360 And then there's this story that, I guess it came out, you know,

00:21:00.180 when nobody's paying attention to the news,

00:21:03.300 that there's some hacking vulnerabilities to electronic voting machines.

00:21:09.320 Specifically, the ones that were tested.

00:21:13.140 It's not to say these are the only ones.

00:21:15.540 But the ones that they tested first were from a company called Dominion.

00:21:19.820 I don't know if you've heard that name in reference to voting machines.

00:21:23.980 But apparently, there were some vulnerabilities which could be exploited.

00:21:30.260 Now, I'm quick to say that there's no evidence

00:21:34.300 that any Dominion voting machines were, in fact, exploited.

00:21:41.280 All right, so that's not the claim.

00:21:43.200 Nobody's claiming they were exploited.

00:21:46.420 Indeed, no court has found that any major fraud happened in 2016.

00:21:52.500 None.

00:21:53.400 None of it was proven.

00:21:54.420 And as you know, if you look in the wrong place for something

00:21:59.960 and use the wrong sensor to find it, and you don't find it, it's not there.

00:22:07.080 That's what we've been taught, and that's what I believe.

00:22:10.580 And so, with the Dominion machines,

00:22:13.060 while there is no evidence whatsoever that anything untoward happened,

00:22:18.700 there are concerns.

00:22:20.300 There are concerns.

00:22:20.960 And there are at least, it seemed that some suggestion

00:22:27.840 that these were bad enough that a vote could have been changed.

00:22:32.540 But what we are not told is whether there would be any way

00:22:36.800 for a vote to be changed that we wouldn't know about

00:22:39.460 or be able to easily know about, I guess.

00:22:45.820 So, what I don't know is, would it be detectable?

00:22:49.580 Is there everything, is every possible thing you could do

00:22:53.900 to one of these vulnerabilities, are they all detectable?

00:22:59.720 Now, I think the company said that their current procedures

00:23:02.500 would have caught all of these problems.

00:23:06.800 And that might be true.

00:23:08.780 So, I actually also feel bad for the company.

00:23:13.280 So, let me give Dominion a little bit of support here.

00:23:18.140 I don't feel like their side of the argument got shown in this article at all.

00:23:24.220 So, I'm not so sure.

00:23:26.340 And this came from, was it AP or Reuters or something?

00:23:29.580 But I'd like to hear their side of the argument.

00:23:36.720 What is the worst vulnerability?

00:23:39.520 Maybe they can't tell us because it makes it even more dangerous.

00:23:43.120 But I'd love to know, what was the worst vulnerability?

00:23:46.760 And then if they say they have a procedure

00:23:48.860 that would have made that vulnerability not such a big deal anyway,

00:23:53.400 what was that procedure?

00:23:54.700 And if somebody had gotten past it, how would you know?

00:23:59.820 You know, there's just some basic questions like that.

00:24:02.060 But they might have good answers to that.

00:24:05.820 Right?

00:24:06.720 They might.

00:24:07.460 They might say, yeah, you know, I hear what you're saying,

00:24:11.300 but there's no way that could have happened and here's why.

00:24:15.360 Maybe.

00:24:16.220 Who knows?

00:24:16.700 I always thought that the big vulnerability in voting systems is the human beings.

00:24:22.560 Isn't it?

00:24:23.860 I feel like an insider could do sort of anything.

00:24:28.540 Maybe you need two insiders.

00:24:30.060 You know, it might not be possible with one.

00:24:32.820 But maybe you need two.

00:24:34.980 So, you know, I always thought that to imagine that any system is unhackable

00:24:40.260 is pretty unrealistic.

00:24:42.200 So, now we know that the voting machines are hypothetically less secure than one would want.

00:24:54.680 Well, in the surprising, non-surprising story of the day,

00:24:59.000 that Sussman attorney guy that was being charged in the Durham case

00:25:06.760 for lying to the FBI for saying that he was not working for Hillary Clinton, I guess,

00:25:12.200 when he brought the Russia collusion lies to the FBI.

00:25:19.680 And the spin that I'm seeing from, I don't even know if this is a spin, so that's unfair.

00:25:27.140 The narrative, let's say, I've seen on Fox News is that it was a D.C. jury

00:25:35.500 and they're all Democrats and Hillary Clinton supporters

00:25:38.940 and there was no way that Sussman was going to get convicted

00:25:42.760 even though the evidence was clearly shown that he lied.

00:25:48.680 Now, I don't know.

00:25:52.800 I'm having a little bit of trouble with that

00:25:55.860 because on one hand, I'm willing to believe that a D.C. jury

00:26:01.580 would always pardon a Democrat

00:26:05.220 or often enough that it could explain what's going on.

00:26:10.660 I mean, that's within the plausible range, I think.

00:26:16.420 It doesn't mean it's true, but it's within the plausible range.

00:26:19.120 The other possibility is that I've never once seen this story explained accurately.

00:26:26.600 How about that?

00:26:28.000 How about the reason that I'm surprised

00:26:30.020 is that I've never once seen the real news?

00:26:36.140 Right?

00:26:37.420 Why would you rule that out?

00:26:39.100 If you were surprised by the verdict,

00:26:41.920 why is it one of the possibilities

00:26:43.620 that you personally have never seen the real news?

00:26:46.000 And that if you saw the real news, you'd say,

00:26:48.620 oh, yeah, it's obvious he wasn't going to be convicted of this.

00:26:53.400 Because what the hell was the defense?

00:26:59.220 You know, didn't they have a defense?

00:27:01.600 The news I saw was that it's obvious he lied.

00:27:07.940 End of the story.

00:27:09.380 That's all I saw.

00:27:10.960 I never saw a defense.

00:27:13.380 The defense was, no, I didn't.

00:27:14.780 And I thought the evidence was pretty clear he did.

00:27:19.260 That's what I thought.

00:27:20.540 But does that mean I saw fake news

00:27:22.780 or that it was a fake jury?

00:27:26.460 Which is more likely?

00:27:28.360 It was a fake jury,

00:27:30.120 meaning they just didn't even follow the law,

00:27:33.580 or that the news that I watched,

00:27:35.520 and maybe some of you too,

00:27:37.100 was so fake

00:27:38.060 that we don't realize that the jury

00:27:40.580 had a perfectly good reason to acquit him?

00:27:42.400 What's more likely?

00:27:47.660 I feel it's more likely that it was fake news.

00:27:52.660 But it's probably a little of both.

00:27:54.500 Meaning that whatever the defense did

00:27:56.820 never got to my ears,

00:27:58.540 but I'd like to hear it.

00:27:59.680 So the defense probably put up

00:28:01.120 a reasonably good defense,

00:28:03.020 I have to think.

00:28:03.680 And I think that one of the facts

00:28:06.000 I hadn't heard before

00:28:06.940 is that the cab ride over

00:28:09.300 was billed not to Hillary Clinton.

00:28:13.000 The cab ride over to talk to the FBI.

00:28:15.560 And I'm like,

00:28:16.440 all right, well,

00:28:17.100 what does it take to get reasonable doubt?

00:28:20.740 You know,

00:28:21.160 it could be just one of those

00:28:22.220 reasonable doubt things

00:28:23.380 where the case

00:28:26.520 is based entirely upon

00:28:28.440 what somebody was thinking.

00:28:30.680 Is that it?

00:28:31.520 Because I think,

00:28:32.920 to be honest,

00:28:33.620 I think I could have gotten him off

00:28:35.020 on that

00:28:36.040 if it had been me.

00:28:37.920 I think if I had been the lawyer,

00:28:39.460 I think I could have gotten him off.

00:28:41.100 I'd say, you know,

00:28:41.840 it really just sort of depends

00:28:42.920 on what you think he was thinking.

00:28:44.820 That's not a standard

00:28:45.720 for convicting somebody.

00:28:48.320 Some version of that.

00:28:49.520 Maybe that's what it is.

00:28:52.460 All right.

00:28:53.240 So a lot of smart people

00:28:54.340 are saying that

00:28:55.020 it was probably a jury problem.

00:28:57.420 And I do not discount that.

00:28:59.360 But also don't discount

00:29:01.320 that there might have been

00:29:02.160 a defense

00:29:02.700 that you just didn't see.

00:29:08.140 And maybe it's just corruption.

00:29:09.980 I would say

00:29:10.580 that's a good possibility.

00:29:12.420 But if you thought

00:29:13.260 that a Democrat

00:29:13.860 would get caught red-handed

00:29:15.740 and then prosecuted,

00:29:18.440 it looks like that didn't happen.

00:29:21.320 Maybe the caught red-handed part.

00:29:24.800 But during...

00:29:25.520 Here's the amazing thing.

00:29:26.560 This is Fox reporting, too, I think.

00:29:31.680 During the course of the trial,

00:29:34.780 Robbie Mook,

00:29:35.660 who was the Clinton campaign manager,

00:29:37.740 he actually testified

00:29:38.800 that Hillary Clinton

00:29:39.840 approved disseminating

00:29:42.260 the unproven

00:29:43.060 and debunked information

00:29:45.260 to the media.

00:29:47.140 So we actually have

00:29:48.020 a court testimony

00:29:49.420 by Hillary Clinton's

00:29:51.100 campaign manager

00:29:51.940 that she literally

00:29:53.020 was the kingpin

00:29:53.960 for the Russia collusion

00:29:55.920 hoax,

00:29:57.660 the most dangerous hoax

00:29:59.120 ever perpetrated

00:30:01.320 on the American people,

00:30:03.140 except for her other hoaxes,

00:30:05.240 I guess.

00:30:08.060 And...

00:30:08.700 And somehow...

00:30:12.700 Somehow we're okay with that.

00:30:16.960 I guess we just go on.

00:30:18.660 Oh, well.

00:30:19.500 I guess we know that now.

00:30:20.720 So, CNN's...

00:30:23.860 The way they're handling it,

00:30:24.900 I thought was fascinating.

00:30:26.940 And...

00:30:27.720 I've said this before,

00:30:29.320 but...

00:30:30.280 CNN became

00:30:31.220 really entertaining again.

00:30:34.660 And it's because

00:30:35.480 I learned to read it differently.

00:30:37.880 Because now I read it for

00:30:39.500 what the official narrative

00:30:42.300 is trying to be.

00:30:43.820 Like, to watch them

00:30:44.840 try to turn a narrative.

00:30:45.940 I'm not really looking at them

00:30:46.880 for news anymore.

00:30:47.640 It's more about, like,

00:30:49.100 a peek behind the curtain

00:30:50.780 to find out

00:30:51.380 what the powers that be

00:30:52.260 you want.

00:30:53.920 But...

00:30:54.600 So Chris Silliza

00:30:55.740 is trying to...

00:30:58.160 trying to paint this

00:31:00.240 as

00:31:01.020 not a gigantic

00:31:03.420 travesty of justice,

00:31:05.400 the thing about

00:31:06.200 Sussman not being 1.00

00:31:07.180 convicted.

00:31:10.220 And...

00:31:10.700 So he writes

00:31:12.260 and CNN goes,

00:31:13.240 for years,

00:31:13.860 literally,

00:31:14.860 Donald Trump

00:31:15.340 has insisted

00:31:15.960 that Hillary Clinton

00:31:16.760 engaged in a purposeful

00:31:18.440 conspiracy

00:31:19.020 designed to keep him

00:31:19.980 out of the White House.

00:31:22.120 Right?

00:31:22.780 So he says this

00:31:23.840 like he's now

00:31:24.600 going to debunk this.

00:31:26.180 But that's the part

00:31:26.960 that was proven

00:31:28.020 to be true.

00:31:29.580 That's what...

00:31:30.640 Didn't Robbie Boock

00:31:31.600 testify that that was true?

00:31:34.040 That Hillary Clinton

00:31:35.080 did engage

00:31:35.800 in a purposeful

00:31:36.680 conspiracy

00:31:37.340 designed to keep him

00:31:38.260 out of the White House.

00:31:39.240 But the way

00:31:40.180 Silliza

00:31:40.840 sets it up,

00:31:43.220 it makes you think

00:31:44.040 that now he's going

00:31:44.940 to show you

00:31:45.360 that that was

00:31:45.840 proven not to be true.

00:31:48.000 And then he goes

00:31:48.920 to probe into it,

00:31:49.900 blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:31:53.000 And he goes,

00:31:53.820 on Tuesday,

00:31:54.480 Sussman was found

00:31:55.320 not guilty

00:31:55.880 of the lying charge,

00:31:57.720 blah, blah, blah.

00:31:58.700 So now,

00:31:59.680 he says,

00:32:00.340 the verdict is

00:32:00.940 a major defeat

00:32:01.680 for Durham

00:32:02.260 and is blah, blah, blah.

00:32:05.440 And it remains

00:32:06.640 to be seen

00:32:07.280 when blah, blah, blah.

00:32:08.860 And I'm thinking,

00:32:10.060 did he just tie together

00:32:11.440 two things

00:32:12.260 that weren't related?

00:32:14.560 So he starts out

00:32:15.660 by saying that

00:32:16.240 Trump made these claims

00:32:17.540 and then he says

00:32:19.180 that this one

00:32:20.920 specific set

00:32:21.720 of charges

00:32:22.360 against Sussman

00:32:23.420 didn't hold up.

00:32:25.720 But during the course

00:32:27.120 of the trial,

00:32:30.380 Trump was proven

00:32:32.340 correct, right?

00:32:33.600 Because Robbie Mook

00:32:34.780 confirmed exactly.

00:32:36.060 And didn't we learn

00:32:39.220 that the lawyer

00:32:40.040 did work for the campaign?

00:32:41.380 It's just not the lying

00:32:42.720 to the FBI part

00:32:43.820 that was the problem.

00:32:45.580 Apparently,

00:32:46.120 he got away with that.

00:32:48.100 So,

00:32:48.940 this is weird.

00:32:52.120 Like,

00:32:52.420 the amount of gaslighting

00:32:54.260 here is

00:32:55.900 so head-shaking

00:32:57.760 and so massive

00:32:59.140 that you don't know

00:33:00.920 what to do with it.

00:33:02.520 Like,

00:33:02.800 your brain can't

00:33:03.400 really process it.

00:33:04.240 It's too big of a,

00:33:05.140 it's too big

00:33:06.460 of a gaslight.

00:33:07.200 You just go,

00:33:07.860 I want to think

00:33:09.620 about something else now.

00:33:14.880 So,

00:33:15.440 apparently,

00:33:15.840 it's not a,

00:33:16.620 it's not any kind

00:33:17.860 of a crime

00:33:18.540 for Hillary Clinton

00:33:20.360 to have created

00:33:21.540 a hoax

00:33:22.340 about

00:33:23.660 Russia collusion

00:33:24.960 with a political

00:33:25.800 candidate

00:33:26.280 that could have

00:33:27.180 changed the course

00:33:28.280 of,

00:33:28.840 well,

00:33:29.100 probably did change

00:33:30.060 the course of

00:33:30.760 history.

00:33:32.280 Let me ask you this.

00:33:35.140 if the United States

00:33:36.960 had not been primed

00:33:38.220 by several years

00:33:39.980 of Hillary Clinton

00:33:40.880 lying about Russia

00:33:42.340 colluding with

00:33:43.560 Trump,

00:33:45.140 would we have

00:33:47.500 been backing Ukraine

00:33:48.660 as vigorously now?

00:33:50.260 Like,

00:33:50.460 it feels like

00:33:50.960 the United States

00:33:51.780 had been primed

00:33:54.000 for an anti-Russia

00:33:55.100 situation.

00:33:57.360 and then

00:33:58.600 an anti-Russia

00:33:59.360 situation,

00:34:00.220 hey,

00:34:01.100 guess what?

00:34:01.960 It came up.

00:34:03.600 So,

00:34:03.840 it feels like

00:34:04.520 we,

00:34:04.880 you know,

00:34:05.580 Hillary has been

00:34:07.300 involved in a long

00:34:09.140 game against Putin

00:34:10.320 and Putin's been

00:34:11.360 in a long game

00:34:12.200 against Hillary 1.00

00:34:12.860 and we're just

00:34:14.100 sort of the

00:34:14.880 innocent bystanders.

00:34:17.160 Like,

00:34:17.380 we're just

00:34:18.040 drive-by victims

00:34:19.440 as they're strafing

00:34:20.940 each other

00:34:21.400 every few years.

00:34:22.500 But,

00:34:25.400 suppose,

00:34:26.780 suppose it was

00:34:28.580 a crime

00:34:29.080 for somebody

00:34:30.440 like Hillary 1.00

00:34:31.500 Clinton

00:34:31.880 to come up

00:34:33.120 with a

00:34:33.760 completely fake

00:34:34.960 hoax

00:34:36.080 and try to

00:34:36.760 sell it

00:34:37.100 to the FBI

00:34:37.740 and,

00:34:39.020 it'd be one thing

00:34:39.760 to just say it

00:34:40.420 on TV.

00:34:42.340 You expect

00:34:43.300 your politicians

00:34:43.960 to lie,

00:34:44.860 but to actually

00:34:45.540 get law enforcement

00:34:46.880 involved

00:34:47.520 to take down

00:34:49.140 a president,

00:34:49.700 what should be

00:34:51.640 the penalty

00:34:52.180 for that

00:34:52.740 if that were

00:34:53.400 a crime?

00:34:53.920 It's not,

00:34:54.500 apparently.

00:34:55.460 Apparently,

00:34:55.940 that's completely

00:34:56.640 legal.

00:34:58.540 But what should

00:34:59.280 be the penalty

00:34:59.860 if it were

00:35:00.580 a crime?

00:35:02.280 Well,

00:35:02.700 I did a little

00:35:03.320 Twitter poll.

00:35:04.100 20% said death.

00:35:05.980 21% said life

00:35:07.300 in prison.

00:35:08.580 10 years in prison

00:35:09.620 was the most

00:35:10.120 popular one,

00:35:10.680 56%.

00:35:11.640 So,

00:35:12.680 basically,

00:35:13.460 we've got

00:35:13.940 the woman 0.98

00:35:16.940 who would

00:35:17.720 have run

00:35:18.320 or would

00:35:20.780 have been

00:35:21.020 the president

00:35:21.680 if not

00:35:22.160 for Trump.

00:35:23.660 And 56%

00:35:25.420 think she

00:35:26.020 should have

00:35:26.400 gone to prison

00:35:27.360 for 10 years

00:35:28.020 for the way

00:35:28.420 she handled

00:35:28.840 the election.

00:35:30.300 At least

00:35:30.620 people answered

00:35:31.260 my poll.

00:35:31.840 Not exactly

00:35:32.440 a scientific

00:35:32.940 poll.

00:35:38.080 So,

00:35:39.060 I guess

00:35:39.500 the Biden

00:35:40.760 administration

00:35:41.240 is now

00:35:41.900 clarifying

00:35:42.580 that they

00:35:43.100 do not

00:35:43.520 wish to

00:35:44.160 remove

00:35:44.920 Putin

00:35:45.300 from power.

00:35:47.520 Indeed,

00:35:48.320 rather than

00:35:49.780 thwart

00:35:50.360 Putin's 0.59

00:35:50.920 ambitions

00:35:51.360 and remove

00:35:52.020 him from

00:35:52.340 power,

00:35:53.220 the new

00:35:53.780 plan is

00:35:54.280 to give

00:35:54.700 him a

00:35:55.500 large part

00:35:56.040 of Ukraine,

00:35:56.960 the valuable

00:35:57.660 parts.

00:35:59.500 So,

00:36:01.180 not exactly

00:36:02.900 a success.

00:36:05.720 And

00:36:06.120 Biden said,

00:36:07.740 we do not

00:36:08.220 seek a war 0.97

00:36:08.780 between NATO

00:36:09.440 and Russia,

00:36:10.140 Biden wrote.

00:36:11.500 As much

00:36:12.000 as I

00:36:12.460 disagree

00:36:12.980 with Mr.

00:36:13.520 Putin

00:36:13.740 and find

00:36:14.780 his actions

00:36:15.360 in outrage,

00:36:16.460 the United

00:36:16.880 States will

00:36:17.420 not try

00:36:17.840 to bring

00:36:18.160 about his

00:36:18.700 ouster in 0.56

00:36:19.420 Moscow.

00:36:20.940 Do you

00:36:21.620 know what

00:36:21.940 feels like

00:36:22.700 happened?

00:36:24.440 Now,

00:36:25.280 I'm going

00:36:25.640 to go full

00:36:26.260 conspiracy

00:36:26.980 theory here,

00:36:28.900 but sort

00:36:29.680 of Eisenhower

00:36:30.480 style,

00:36:31.460 meaning,

00:36:32.300 not really.

00:36:34.560 Doesn't it

00:36:35.100 feel as if

00:36:35.700 the military

00:36:37.040 industrial

00:36:37.540 complex just

00:36:39.200 needed something

00:36:40.000 to replace

00:36:40.800 Middle 0.95

00:36:42.300 Eastern wars

00:36:43.140 in Afghanistan

00:36:44.880 and they

00:36:46.180 knew that

00:36:47.260 we had

00:36:47.540 all of

00:36:47.920 this

00:36:48.160 old

00:36:48.720 equipment

00:36:49.200 that

00:36:50.080 needed

00:36:50.340 to be

00:36:50.720 used

00:36:51.000 up

00:36:51.260 before

00:36:51.600 anybody

00:36:52.760 buys

00:36:53.120 new

00:36:53.380 stuff

00:36:53.740 and

00:36:54.920 that

00:36:55.300 the

00:36:56.980 entire

00:36:57.340 Ukraine

00:36:57.800 war

00:36:58.060 was

00:36:58.280 orchestrated

00:36:58.860 by the

00:36:59.380 industrial

00:36:59.840 military

00:37:00.400 complex

00:37:01.020 and it

00:37:02.060 was about

00:37:02.780 nothing but

00:37:03.460 moving

00:37:03.780 inventory

00:37:04.300 and that

00:37:06.020 the reason

00:37:06.640 that Biden

00:37:07.120 has now

00:37:07.640 pivoted to,

00:37:08.340 well,

00:37:08.980 maybe we

00:37:09.380 can work

00:37:09.780 with this

00:37:10.220 Putin guy

00:37:10.920 is because

00:37:12.180 the

00:37:13.660 military

00:37:14.600 industrial

00:37:15.100 complex

00:37:15.740 literally

00:37:16.440 can't make

00:37:17.420 any weapons

00:37:18.160 faster than

00:37:19.020 they already

00:37:19.480 are.

00:37:21.440 Meaning,

00:37:22.700 they don't

00:37:23.180 need any

00:37:23.660 extra war

00:37:24.300 now.

00:37:25.260 We have

00:37:25.600 just the

00:37:26.180 right amount

00:37:26.560 of conflict

00:37:27.220 because all

00:37:28.340 of the

00:37:28.720 weapons

00:37:29.340 makers

00:37:30.400 are cranking

00:37:31.980 out weapons

00:37:32.560 as fast

00:37:33.040 as they can

00:37:33.500 to replace

00:37:34.080 the stockpiles

00:37:34.900 of stuff

00:37:35.340 that went

00:37:35.820 to Ukraine.

00:37:37.060 Is it a

00:37:38.620 fucking

00:37:38.980 coincidence

00:37:39.640 that the

00:37:40.840 real world

00:37:41.600 happens to

00:37:42.320 correspond

00:37:42.720 exactly

00:37:43.640 to what

00:37:44.600 one could

00:37:45.100 imagine

00:37:45.520 would be

00:37:45.920 the best

00:37:46.400 interests

00:37:46.840 of a

00:37:47.360 specific

00:37:47.800 industry?

00:37:49.320 How is

00:37:50.140 that a

00:37:50.520 coincidence?

00:37:53.200 So,

00:37:53.960 if you

00:37:54.520 wanted to

00:37:54.920 follow the

00:37:55.460 money,

00:37:56.660 I would

00:37:56.920 say,

00:37:57.960 look at

00:37:58.380 whether

00:37:58.660 our

00:37:59.220 weapons

00:38:01.680 makers

00:38:02.160 are operating

00:38:03.240 at capacity.

00:38:04.640 If they're

00:38:05.260 making

00:38:05.660 drones and

00:38:06.560 missiles

00:38:06.860 and replacement

00:38:07.860 tanks and

00:38:08.560 everything else

00:38:09.180 and handheld

00:38:10.660 missiles,

00:38:12.320 what do you

00:38:12.760 call it,

00:38:13.100 the shoulder

00:38:13.460 mounted stuff,

00:38:14.260 if we're

00:38:14.660 making that

00:38:15.080 as fast

00:38:15.700 as we

00:38:16.060 can so

00:38:17.620 that there

00:38:18.080 would be

00:38:18.340 no benefit

00:38:18.980 of having

00:38:19.520 any extra

00:38:20.160 conflict,

00:38:21.140 you should

00:38:21.740 expect that

00:38:22.300 we'll negotiate

00:38:22.920 some kind

00:38:23.420 of a deal.

00:38:25.400 That's where

00:38:26.020 the money

00:38:26.340 says we're

00:38:26.840 going.

00:38:28.400 So,

00:38:30.100 let me

00:38:32.440 summarize

00:38:32.760 this.

00:38:33.240 there are

00:38:35.860 two things

00:38:36.360 we learned

00:38:38.500 this month.

00:38:41.320 One is

00:38:42.040 that everything

00:38:42.520 you suspected

00:38:43.300 was true.

00:38:45.980 Everything

00:38:46.660 you suspected

00:38:47.520 was true.

00:38:49.500 Hillary Clinton

00:38:50.440 was behind

00:38:52.700 the Russia

00:38:53.600 collusion

00:38:54.020 hoax.

00:38:55.140 Voting

00:38:55.760 machines

00:38:56.420 are

00:38:58.080 vulnerable,

00:39:00.020 as you

00:39:00.460 suspected.

00:39:00.940 transitory

00:39:02.460 inflation

00:39:02.940 was always

00:39:03.580 a lie.

00:39:04.540 It was

00:39:04.760 always a

00:39:05.180 lie.

00:39:07.780 Mask

00:39:08.340 mandates

00:39:08.880 don't

00:39:09.640 work.

00:39:12.680 And

00:39:13.240 the

00:39:14.280 Biden

00:39:14.480 family

00:39:14.900 are

00:39:15.240 crooks.

00:39:16.960 All the

00:39:17.560 things you

00:39:17.960 thought were

00:39:18.440 true

00:39:18.780 have

00:39:20.040 actually

00:39:20.420 been

00:39:20.880 shown

00:39:21.520 to be

00:39:21.860 true.

00:39:22.760 So,

00:39:22.920 that's

00:39:23.100 number

00:39:23.360 one.

00:39:23.700 That's

00:39:23.900 the first

00:39:24.240 thing

00:39:24.420 you've

00:39:24.620 learned.

00:39:25.020 Everything

00:39:25.260 you

00:39:25.520 suspected

00:39:25.980 was

00:39:26.280 true.

00:39:27.740 Weird.

00:39:29.360 And

00:39:29.560 number

00:39:29.760 two,

00:39:30.060 no one

00:39:31.120 will be

00:39:31.460 held

00:39:31.680 responsible.

00:39:34.520 Everything

00:39:35.120 you

00:39:35.400 suspected

00:39:35.920 was

00:39:36.260 true.

00:39:37.680 No

00:39:38.060 one

00:39:38.240 will

00:39:38.420 be

00:39:38.580 held

00:39:38.780 responsible.

00:39:40.140 None

00:39:40.420 of

00:39:40.540 these

00:39:40.700 stories

00:39:41.020 have

00:39:41.220 anybody

00:39:41.560 going

00:39:42.400 to

00:39:42.620 jail.

00:39:44.120 Right?

00:39:45.640 Who's

00:39:46.320 going to

00:39:47.120 lose a

00:39:47.640 job?

00:39:49.560 Anything.

00:39:51.520 Who

00:39:52.160 lost an

00:39:52.720 election,

00:39:53.160 lost a

00:39:53.540 job,

00:39:54.860 went to

00:39:55.280 jail,

00:39:56.240 paid a

00:39:56.580 ticket?

00:39:57.560 Anything.

00:39:58.840 Every one

00:39:59.320 of those

00:39:59.600 things that

00:39:59.940 you

00:40:00.040 thought

00:40:00.340 maybe

00:40:01.040 were

00:40:01.300 true,

00:40:01.660 were

00:40:01.760 true.

00:40:04.640 Now,

00:40:05.380 that doesn't

00:40:06.340 mean that

00:40:06.700 the 2016

00:40:07.420 election was

00:40:08.560 rigged.

00:40:09.000 That's a

00:40:09.660 different topic.

00:40:10.580 I'm not

00:40:10.900 saying that.

00:40:12.460 I'm saying

00:40:13.140 that anything

00:40:13.560 that can be

00:40:14.180 rigged will

00:40:14.660 be rigged.

00:40:16.080 You just

00:40:16.500 don't know

00:40:16.920 if it's

00:40:17.180 happened yet.

00:40:19.340 So,

00:40:20.060 we do

00:40:20.860 know that

00:40:21.660 if these

00:40:22.040 vulnerabilities

00:40:22.500 were the

00:40:23.140 kind that

00:40:23.440 could actually

00:40:23.800 change

00:40:24.160 elections,

00:40:25.240 I'm not

00:40:25.840 sure that's

00:40:26.220 true.

00:40:26.420 But if

00:40:27.520 that's

00:40:27.760 true,

00:40:28.200 that they

00:40:28.520 were that

00:40:29.060 kind of

00:40:29.420 vulnerabilities,

00:40:30.420 and they

00:40:31.080 had persisted,

00:40:32.680 somebody would

00:40:33.700 have rigged

00:40:34.340 an election

00:40:34.780 eventually,

00:40:35.720 probably.

00:40:36.820 You just

00:40:37.240 have to

00:40:37.480 wait for

00:40:37.800 it.

00:40:38.440 We just

00:40:39.080 don't know

00:40:39.620 if it

00:40:39.900 happened

00:40:40.220 already.

00:40:44.460 And can

00:40:45.240 we get a

00:40:45.780 Johnny Depp

00:40:46.340 verdict today?

00:40:47.440 Please.

00:40:48.480 Can we?

00:40:48.940 You keep

00:40:55.560 saying

00:40:56.020 2016?

00:40:59.420 Oh,

00:40:59.960 I'm sorry.

00:41:00.840 2020,

00:41:01.500 yes.

00:41:02.380 2020

00:41:02.820 election.

00:41:03.540 We don't

00:41:03.920 know about

00:41:04.240 the 2020

00:41:04.680 election.

00:41:12.380 Yeah,

00:41:12.920 we need

00:41:13.220 a Johnny

00:41:13.720 Depp

00:41:14.080 verdict to

00:41:15.200 entertain

00:41:15.620 us.

00:41:16.560 Well,

00:41:17.000 ladies and 0.98

00:41:17.400 gentlemen,

00:41:18.940 that concludes

00:41:21.100 the live

00:41:21.700 stream.

00:41:22.640 And I

00:41:24.440 think you

00:41:24.860 would probably

00:41:25.240 agree that

00:41:27.000 the long

00:41:27.480 COVID made

00:41:28.260 this a

00:41:28.620 better show

00:41:29.080 than normal.

00:41:30.260 Right?

00:41:31.100 A little bit

00:41:31.680 better.

00:41:32.680 And you

00:41:34.160 should start

00:41:34.640 looking out

00:41:35.100 for the

00:41:35.540 little super

00:41:36.240 powers you're

00:41:36.860 going to get

00:41:37.320 to.

00:41:38.180 Maybe you'll

00:41:38.740 get a little

00:41:39.080 better rest,

00:41:41.040 concentrate

00:41:41.460 better,

00:41:42.820 might have a

00:41:43.260 little bit

00:41:43.520 more energy

00:41:44.100 for exercising.

00:41:45.040 I'll bet

00:41:46.180 you'll even

00:41:46.620 die a

00:41:47.140 better.

00:41:48.480 Let that

00:41:49.060 long COVID

00:41:49.780 work for

00:41:50.760 you.

00:41:52.520 All right.

00:41:53.700 Get those

00:41:54.760 good mutations

00:41:55.520 working for

00:41:56.280 you.

00:41:58.100 And

00:41:58.440 and

00:42:04.060 and

00:42:07.260 that's

00:42:08.300 enough for

00:42:08.600 today.

00:42:09.540 Goodbye,

00:42:09.900 YouTube.

00:42:15.040 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 01, 2022

Episode 1761 Scott Adams： Well, It Turns Out Everything You Suspected Was True. Let's Talk About It

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript