Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1769 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About The Kangaroo Court And Chuck Schumer's Impeachment

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to another highlight of a civilization.

00:00:07.220 It's the kind of moment that makes you glad you're alive.

00:00:11.280 Or at least glad I am, because otherwise you'd be looking at a blank screen.

00:00:16.200 And that's no fun.

00:00:17.920 So instead, why don't we ramp up our enjoyment?

00:00:22.240 Let me get your dopamine pump working. 1.00

00:00:25.660 A little oxytocin, too.

00:00:28.200 Serotonin coming online.

00:00:30.400 Everything's going to feel better in a moment.

00:00:32.320 Do you feel a tingle?

00:00:33.940 Is it a building?

00:00:34.960 The excitement, the anticipation, the camaraderie, the fellowship.

00:00:40.620 It's all happening now.

00:00:42.120 And it's thanks to the simultaneity of it all.

00:00:46.120 And all you need to make this another special experience is a cupper mug or a glass of tanker

00:00:50.560 Chelsea Stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:54.420 Fill it with your favorite beverage.

00:00:58.080 I like coffee.

00:00:58.880 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:01:05.140 All of your chemistry is starting to come together.

00:01:07.600 It's the simultaneous sip.

00:01:09.120 It happens now.

00:01:09.720 Go.

00:01:09.960 Go.

00:01:10.060 Well, yesterday was my birthday and many good people took time out of their day to say nice things.

00:01:31.180 And I appreciated it a lot.

00:01:34.440 But we're back to normal now.

00:01:38.920 So, back to a normal day.

00:01:42.500 I hate going back to normal.

00:01:43.660 I like it when everybody's, like, extra nice to me for a day.

00:01:47.740 Birthdays are cool.

00:01:49.740 All right.

00:01:50.080 Do you have the same experience I have that you get up and you think, I'm going to go to my computer and I'm going to do some work?

00:01:59.960 And then the computer decides that it's going to make you hack into it.

00:02:06.060 Today won't be a day you just put in your password.

00:02:08.340 Like, it starts with a little foreshadowing, doesn't it?

00:02:12.480 And the foreshadowing is a little message that pops up and says, hey, you know, I'm just, I thought you might know, want to know.

00:02:21.180 There's another operating system available, a new update, and you might want it.

00:02:25.840 And the first time it pops up, you're like, later.

00:02:30.300 Make it go away.

00:02:32.060 Day two, just a suggestion.

00:02:34.920 Hey, hey, hey.

00:02:36.400 You know, still, it's day two, just want to remind you.

00:02:39.860 After about day 65 or so, it starts getting really sort of asshole-ish, if you know what I mean.

00:02:48.860 It's like, not only when you click it, does it take over your screen instead of just going away.

00:02:55.840 But it'll start to slow down your computer, I think.

00:03:00.220 Now, I can't prove this, but I feel like it's slowing down my computer to punish me for not upgrading.

00:03:08.660 And today it was giving me all kinds of warnings about things.

00:03:11.780 Now, do you know why I don't upgrade?

00:03:14.420 Because it seems like that would be, you know, it's free, and it makes your computer better, right?

00:03:19.900 Why wouldn't you upgrade?

00:03:21.440 The reason I don't is because I don't want to lose an entire day of work.

00:03:25.840 Because I know when I upgrade, it won't work.

00:03:28.580 Like this morning.

00:03:30.240 I've been trying all morning to just, you know, update my software on my machine.

00:03:36.060 But, you know, it's not done.

00:03:37.820 And it only got me to the point where everything that I was logged into, it logged down of.

00:03:42.080 Now I have to re-hack into every open app.

00:03:47.320 Because do you think I'm just going to open them and put in my password?

00:03:50.900 And then the app will say, oh, welcome back.

00:03:53.320 No.

00:03:54.420 No, that's not going to happen.

00:03:56.240 Every app is going to make me fight.

00:03:58.560 It's going to be a fight.

00:03:59.400 But we might email you a code.

00:04:04.540 Oh, you didn't get it?

00:04:05.980 Well, why don't you check your spam?

00:04:08.200 Oh, you did check your spam.

00:04:09.940 Why don't you check it again?

00:04:11.820 Why don't you reboot?

00:04:13.380 Why don't you click it again and ask for it again?

00:04:16.460 No, you can't get back.

00:04:17.760 You can never get back.

00:04:18.780 You can only get further away from the apps.

00:04:20.520 So, yeah, the whole app ecosystem is a complete disaster.

00:04:29.000 Here's a question for you.

00:04:30.660 So Ted Lieu was doing some grandstanding on the question of, I don't know, something about LGBTQ rights.

00:04:39.300 He's pro-LGBTQ rights, as everybody should be.

00:04:47.960 And he said he wanted to make a point.

00:04:50.520 So he said he thought he would now recite for you.

00:04:53.680 He did this, I guess, at the house in public.

00:04:57.720 He said, I'm going to recite for you what Jesus Christ said about homosexuality, Lieu declared, before standing there silently.

00:05:06.220 Oh, I get it.

00:05:07.580 I get it.

00:05:08.080 He stood there silently because the point was that Jesus Christ didn't have anything to say about homosexuality.

00:05:17.300 And so I guess his point was that if you're a religious person, you can't be looking to your religion for your guidance on LGBTQ stuff because Jesus never mentioned it.

00:05:30.400 That would be his point.

00:05:31.280 Now, I don't care about that, but it made me wonder, correct me if I'm wrong, but Jesus could cure diseases, could he not?

00:05:42.640 He could.

00:05:43.360 And since I believe, and some of you don't, because you're terrible people, that people come in all types, so there's nothing that's exactly normal.

00:05:58.560 Everybody's just different.

00:06:00.000 And so I don't rank people by, you know, by their differences.

00:06:06.440 But it makes me curious.

00:06:10.160 Could Jesus turn you gay if he wanted to? 0.89

00:06:14.720 Because Jesus could cure a disease, could turn water into wine, could walk on water.

00:06:23.800 And I'm just curious.

00:06:24.860 I'm not saying he would want to.

00:06:26.580 I'm not saying there's any reason to.

00:06:28.020 I'm just saying, would he be able to?

00:06:33.280 Could Jesus take a hetero person and just turn them gay? 0.96

00:06:38.800 Now, again, no reason to.

00:06:40.980 It was just sort of a curiosity.

00:06:43.460 Could he?

00:06:45.100 Anyway, I'll let you think about that for a while.

00:06:48.760 So I guess the Republicans tried to get some bill that would give more security for Supreme Court justices and their families, and the House Democrats blocked it.

00:07:02.340 What do you think of that?

00:07:08.180 So the Democrats blocked the bill to provide more security in the context of, we know, some guy actually had a plan and weapons and went to the House of Kavanaugh to try to murder him in his sleep or at his house.

00:07:22.720 So this just happened, like a real murder attempt was thwarted, and the Democrats block a bill from the Republicans that would have given more security to Supreme Court justices.

00:07:36.220 What's your first reaction to that?

00:07:38.000 Is your first reaction, damn those Democrats who can't stop being political?

00:07:47.440 That wasn't my first reaction.

00:07:49.120 My first reaction is it's fake news.

00:07:52.700 Here's what I mean.

00:07:53.640 I haven't seen the details of this Republican bill, but I'm going to start with the following assumptions and see if you can agree with...

00:08:02.520 Just start with the assumptions and see if you agree with me, all right?

00:08:06.320 If you don't agree with the starting assumption, you won't agree with what comes next.

00:08:10.740 The starting assumption is that every member of Congress is a worthless asshole.

00:08:17.460 That's the starting assumption.

00:08:18.840 If you're not with me on that, then the rest won't follow.

00:08:21.040 And so, what would worthless assholes do in this situation?

00:08:28.640 Well, ask yourself what helpful people would do, and then it would be opposite of that.

00:08:33.620 A helpful person might come up with a good, clean bill that would keep Supreme Court justices safe.

00:08:43.480 Do you think the Republicans did that?

00:08:45.420 Do you think the Republican bill, if I looked at the details, would it be a nice, clean bill, nothing really to argue with, it's just keeping those Supreme Court people safe?

00:08:56.840 Or, or, do you think they put something in it to make it a poison pill?

00:09:01.860 So that the Democrats would have to turn it down, and then they could spin it as the Democrats not protecting the Supreme Court.

00:09:11.140 Which one of those happened?

00:09:13.020 Now, I don't know the answer to that, because I haven't looked at the bill.

00:09:15.420 But if your first impression was that the Democrats are turning down a perfectly good bill to protect the Supreme Court, you haven't been paying attention to anything.

00:09:27.840 Because I would assume that they're like these competent, you know, good people on one side in Congress, but then the evil Democrats are keeping them from doing what they want.

00:09:37.580 I don't see anything like that.

00:09:40.580 I see a bunch of incompetent assholes who do not have your best interests in mind, who are just, you know, involved in a skunk fight.

00:09:48.620 That's my base assumption, until proven otherwise.

00:09:52.460 So if you take your base assumption that they're all just useless assholes, why would the Republicans even bother coming up with a good bill that could be passed?

00:10:02.900 Why would they bother?

00:10:04.300 There would be no point in it.

00:10:05.580 Because that's what good people do who are trying to help.

00:10:09.840 And if we had elected good people who want to help, wouldn't things look a lot different?

00:10:15.880 Clearly.

00:10:17.800 So let me go out on a limb here.

00:10:21.220 I have not read the bill.

00:10:24.080 Because, as I mentioned, a little technical difficulty this morning.

00:10:27.600 I would have, but I ran out of time.

00:10:29.740 Without even reading the bill, and based on the assumption that everyone in Congress is a worthless asshole who doesn't care about you at all, I don't believe that bill was legitimate.

00:10:41.900 Can anybody confirm or deny that?

00:10:44.920 Has anybody seen the bill?

00:10:45.900 Because if you think the Democrats were the bad guys in this story, I say maybe.

00:10:54.600 I say maybe.

00:10:56.800 Like, I can't rule it out.

00:10:58.860 But it's not my first assumption.

00:11:01.620 And if that was your first assumption, then you're a little too gullible, even if you're right.

00:11:06.880 It could turn out you're right.

00:11:08.440 But it shouldn't have been your first assumption.

00:11:11.460 First assumption should have been skullduggery.

00:11:14.600 Because that's what they do.

00:11:17.280 All right.

00:11:21.980 Did you see Joe Biden on Jimmy Kimmel?

00:11:25.260 There are a number of clips that are being shown by the RNC.

00:11:30.460 The RNC has a Twitter site that just shows embarrassing clips of Biden and his people.

00:11:36.180 Oh, my God.

00:11:40.720 You get the very clear intention that Jimmy Kimmel knows he's talking to somebody who's not mentally capable.

00:11:47.960 So look for that first.

00:11:50.160 The way Kimmel is sort of trying to lead him to the right answers and gently coax him along,

00:11:57.340 he does not look like he's talking to a politician or anybody who has any power whatsoever.

00:12:02.980 He looks like he's talking to a patient.

00:12:06.180 It looks like he's talking to somebody in a hospital.

00:12:09.980 That's what it looks like.

00:12:11.700 Now, and that's not even hyperbole.

00:12:13.440 If you watch it, you'll say, oh, he's talking to him like great-grandpa who's got two months left in the dementia ward.

00:12:21.780 So it was really cringy, as others have pointed out.

00:12:29.080 But among the things that he said, he's blaming his low approval ratings on the fact that the media is not getting his message out.

00:12:45.060 In other words, he's pretty sure he's doing good things, but the media is not telling the rest of the world,

00:12:51.300 so he's going to have to prime the media more so that they can inform you of all the good things he's doing.

00:12:56.040 And I'm saying to myself, how close is that to blaming his ratings on fake news?

00:13:02.640 Because is he not saying that the reality is that we're doing a good job, but the news is not reporting it in an accurate way?

00:13:13.800 Like, that's fake news.

00:13:19.220 I mean, everything that I said about Biden is coming true.

00:13:24.300 Now, a lot of you said the same thing.

00:13:25.900 So this is definitely one category where I'm not going to say, hey, I'm the only person in the world who got this one right.

00:13:32.040 But weren't you concerned that Biden would have to basically become Trump to get anything done?

00:13:41.760 Because being the anti-Trump meant you had to pick policies that don't work.

00:13:47.800 Because to the extent that Trump made stuff work, you know, and I'm not saying he made everything work.

00:13:54.180 I got my complaints, too.

00:13:56.500 But here again, basically, Biden is, you know, instead of make America great again, he's build back better.

00:14:04.120 Instead of fixing all that lying, he just brought more lying into the office.

00:14:08.360 Because, you know, and now he's blaming fake news for his problems.

00:14:15.340 He's basically just Trump-like.

00:14:21.540 You know, here's something I've said about Biden since before he ran against Trump.

00:14:27.660 And the reason that I thought Biden would not run against Trump is that when I look at him, here's what I think.

00:14:33.720 If you started with Trump as your base model, and then you subtracted out of Trump everything that's good and interesting, what would be left would be Biden.

00:14:47.840 Biden is what's left after you subtract out all the good parts from Trump.

00:14:52.200 It'd be like the part you throw away.

00:14:53.880 Like, that's what it feels like.

00:14:58.040 Like, even the things that Trump gets the most criticism for are generally some element of what makes him effective, right?

00:15:07.260 His ability to get attention, to persuade, et cetera.

00:15:10.180 So, the other thing that Biden said is that something about putting Republicans in jail.

00:15:22.680 You know, Kimmel was saying, you know, why can't something be different or get done?

00:15:27.700 And Biden makes some kind of sweeping, joking generality about putting his enemies in jail.

00:15:33.080 And I'm thinking, ooh, that's what you're doing.

00:15:38.680 He's saying that right around January 6th.

00:15:41.340 I mean, right around the hearings tonight.

00:15:44.560 By the way, what time are the hearings?

00:15:46.340 It's prime time, right?

00:15:48.000 So, the January 6th kangaroo court, which, by the way, you shouldn't call it anything else.

00:15:54.520 Because I don't think you have to be anti-Democrat.

00:15:59.860 But, because even the New York Times is basically saying it's a show trial.

00:16:04.800 So, even the Democrats, you know, would admit that the point of it is just political, right?

00:16:11.060 So, nobody's arguing that anymore.

00:16:13.820 It's a settled fact that it is a kangaroo court.

00:16:18.400 A show trial.

00:16:19.720 So, we shouldn't talk about it any other way.

00:16:22.060 We should talk about it as a show trial.

00:16:23.780 Now, believe it or not, this is making me extra mad at Republicans.

00:16:33.820 I know that seems opposite, right?

00:16:35.780 Like, I really hate everything about this kangaroo court.

00:16:39.180 But here's what's bothering me about the whole situation.

00:16:42.420 And I'm going to hold my fire for a little bit.

00:16:45.720 So, let's say I'm a little premature in my criticism because I'm expecting an outcome.

00:16:51.160 But I could be wrong.

00:16:51.940 And here's why I'm so mad at Republicans.

00:16:56.560 Democrats have accidentally created a gigantic opening for Republicans to dismantle their whole hoax-generating machinery in front of the public when the public has to pay attention.

00:17:11.840 Because they've said, this next thing is going to get a lot of attention.

00:17:17.080 And even though the members of the committee are either rhinos or Democrats, you can't have a story this big without talking to Republicans. 0.77

00:17:29.120 Republican voices will be heard on this topic somehow.

00:17:33.060 You know, even if it's just people making provocative statements on the steps or the whatever.

00:17:37.800 So, if no Republican can eviscerate their entire hoax machinery when they give them this big of an opening, I don't know what can.

00:17:51.480 And here's what I'm talking about.

00:17:52.900 You've all seen this news, I think.

00:17:54.560 You've seen the clips of Chuck Schumer back when Kavanaugh was being confirmed, calling out people.

00:18:03.340 And he was actually saying that Kavanaugh and Gorsuch calling out the two conservative recent members and saying that they would reap the whirlwind.

00:18:13.060 And basically, they would be personally sorry about the blowback that they would get, personally, for their bad decisions.

00:18:23.660 Now, keep in mind that these are not elected people.

00:18:26.820 They're appointed for life.

00:18:28.700 And therefore, the one and only way that something bad could be happening to them is outside of the political process.

00:18:36.880 Basically, violence or some kind of retribution.

00:18:40.900 Now, that video exists at the same time that we know this guy actually tried to act on it because he thought he'd be a hero if he murdered a Supreme Court justice.

00:18:55.840 And that's because their side said that's true.

00:18:59.880 I mean, Chuck Schumer basically said that the decisions from the Supreme Court are likely to be so bad with these conservative justices that they will.

00:19:13.720 And the context in which he said it was that they deserved it.

00:19:18.300 He didn't use that word.

00:19:20.120 But he basically made a case for their assassination.

00:19:24.380 That's what I heard.

00:19:25.940 What did you hear?

00:19:26.740 Because how else would you keep somebody who has got a lifetime appointment from doing their job?

00:19:33.940 What's the other way to do it?

00:19:36.380 I don't know of another way to do it.

00:19:38.500 Do you?

00:19:39.240 Court packing?

00:19:40.540 Court packing is not them being personally impacted.

00:19:46.260 He was very specific that the impact would be on them personally.

00:19:51.680 Right?

00:19:52.280 Listen to the video.

00:19:53.120 It's very specific.

00:19:54.180 He's not talking about the country or Republicans or anything like that.

00:19:58.660 He's talking about those two people by name will be sorry.

00:20:02.860 What else is it?

00:20:04.760 Now, if you're a Republican and you get to talk about anything about whether Trump said something that incentivized these protesters,

00:20:14.920 why would not your answer be, all right, let's put it in context?

00:20:21.260 And don't even say any defense of President Trump.

00:20:31.760 Here's how I would do it if I were a Republican.

00:20:35.420 Now, remember, this is a show trial.

00:20:38.180 So what I'm going to say is for show.

00:20:40.480 It's not practical in any way.

00:20:42.000 So what I would do is if I were a prominent Republican, I'd say, you know what we should do?

00:20:47.260 We should combine two cases.

00:20:50.340 We should combine the Schumer case with the January 6 Trump case, because whatever you decide for one should apply to the other.

00:20:59.340 That if you decide that what Trump said caused violence, then let's just get it over with and say at the same time that Schumer caused this attempted assassination.

00:21:13.320 Now, would you figure out that Cheney and Kinzinger are in on the show?

00:21:20.060 Yeah, no, I know the RINOs are in on the Democrat side of this.

00:21:25.920 But the Republicans are still going to get to talk.

00:21:29.080 I mean, there's going to be somebody who's either a witness or something.

00:21:34.080 They're going to get to talk.

00:21:35.460 So when they get to talk, or even if they're just talking about it, you know, somebody in the Senate, for example, could say,

00:21:42.200 I suggest that we treat these two as the same story because the public wants to see both.

00:21:48.440 And there's nothing really to investigate when it comes to Chuck Schumer's statement and this guy who got picked up,

00:21:56.580 because those are facts that are in evidence, right?

00:21:58.980 Nobody's arguing that there was no assassination attempt.

00:22:05.040 Nobody's arguing that the guy didn't say his motives clearly.

00:22:08.380 He explained his motives.

00:22:10.160 And nobody's arguing that that audio and video targets those.

00:22:15.820 So there's nothing to investigate.

00:22:18.140 Just combine the two stories and say, let's treat them the same.

00:22:22.080 The day that you decide that Trump was responsible, should you decide that, you should also ask for Schumer's resignation.

00:22:32.200 Now, at the very least, every Republican should be asking for Schumer's resignation.

00:22:36.800 Because you could argue that what Trump did was ambiguous, but you can't argue what Schumer did was ambiguous.

00:22:46.440 That was pretty direct.

00:22:49.380 So it could be that maybe, you know, Republicans don't want to pair those two stories,

00:22:54.340 because, you know, if they're both guilty, that includes Trump.

00:22:57.040 But the more, you know, the more appropriate way to treat it is to say that it was messed up in both cases.

00:23:06.800 But we don't put people in jail for that, necessarily.

00:23:14.920 Yeah.

00:23:15.360 So I would also, if I were the Republicans, use the opportunity to call out all of the hoaxes perpetrated by the Democrats.

00:23:28.140 And as long as you get to talk, I'd say I'd like to read into the record the list of the top 10 Democrat hoaxes so far.

00:23:36.280 And then I would say, we're looking at adding number 11 to the list, which is the idea that Republicans will bring guns to any event except an insurrection against their government.

00:23:51.700 And that the reason they have guns is to protect against the government.

00:23:56.680 But then when the one and only time they didn't bring them or use them, I guess some people had them, you know, they had them in possession.

00:24:03.680 But they were not used, was the one time that they say they would use them, you know, to protect the republic.

00:24:13.340 So I would just put it in the context of the 11th hoax.

00:24:18.820 So if you were a casual viewer of the news, and you were just sort of dipping in,

00:24:25.280 and you just heard there was this thing about Trump, you know, getting the protesters all riled up,

00:24:32.700 and the question was whether Trump did or not, I would also want you to hear that the defense is this is the 11th hoax.

00:24:42.140 Because calling it number 11, like, makes it real.

00:24:47.420 Whereas if you just said, hey, it's a hoax, that just sounds like noise.

00:24:52.300 Yeah, everything's a hoax. I get it.

00:24:53.880 Everything the other side says is wrong. I get it.

00:24:56.840 There's no traction.

00:24:59.920 But if you say, here are the top 10 Democrat hoaxes, and I made that list so you can get it from my Twitter feed,

00:25:06.660 and here's the 11th one, and that's the one we're talking about today.

00:25:10.660 And the way the 11th hoax has worked is that they're convincing you that the only place that republicans don't bring and use guns

00:25:18.340 is to the one place that anybody would bring and use a gun if they planned an insurrection against the government.

00:25:25.240 And to say, if you believe this, then this is the 11th hoax that you've accepted,

00:25:32.380 and you should consider expanding your news sources.

00:25:36.980 Now, if they said, go watch Fox News, and everything would fall apart,

00:25:40.500 because people would be blah, blah, blah, Fox News.

00:25:42.960 But if you said, I would encourage you all to expand your news sources,

00:25:48.040 because the government has turned into a hoax operating system.

00:25:52.120 The Democrats largely produce one hoax after another,

00:25:55.580 as they're essentially the energy they use to run the country.

00:26:00.240 And wouldn't you rather be run on science, or on principle, or on the Constitution,

00:26:08.900 instead of on hoaxes?

00:26:11.440 And I would just frame the Democrat Party as the hoaxing party

00:26:15.240 while they're doing a hoax in public.

00:26:18.360 Because there's nobody in the world who can hear me say,

00:26:21.660 it's the only place republicans don't bring guns is to an insurrection. 0.97

00:26:25.740 That's the beginning and the end of the argument.

00:26:27.900 It really is.

00:26:31.100 You could just say that every time somebody said something else.

00:26:34.560 They'd say, Mr. Jones, what were you doing that day?

00:26:39.080 And no matter what the question is, you'd say,

00:26:41.300 well, I'll tell you what I wasn't doing.

00:26:44.980 I wasn't bringing any loaded firearms to what you're calling an insurrection.

00:26:49.980 So I guess I'm not really good at insurrections, am I?

00:26:53.860 And no matter what the question is, I'd answer it the same way.

00:26:57.900 You know, we didn't bring guns.

00:27:01.620 Do you have any idea how many guns I own?

00:27:04.880 Really?

00:27:06.360 Yeah, the question would be,

00:27:08.420 Mr. Adams, can you tell us your profession?

00:27:11.620 And I'd say, yes, I can.

00:27:14.080 But first, I'd like you to know that I own 17 guns,

00:27:17.300 and I didn't bring any of them to what you're calling the insurrection.

00:27:20.900 And my profession is cartoonist.

00:27:25.120 I wouldn't say anything else.

00:27:27.440 Just that one fucking thing over and over again.

00:27:30.780 Because here's what the Republicans are getting wrong.

00:27:35.180 They're treating it seriously.

00:27:38.740 You know, I suppose the outcome has a serious repercussion.

00:27:43.280 But the Republicans don't have anybody who can mock this thing

00:27:46.800 the way it needs to get mocked.

00:27:48.940 Because they're treating it like it's a court case.

00:27:54.120 Or, you know, they're calling it a kangaroo court.

00:27:56.560 They're treating it kind of politically.

00:27:58.540 This should be treated as humor.

00:28:01.660 Because this is the most ridiculous fucking thing we've ever seen in public.

00:28:07.200 You know, you could argue that some of their other hoaxes,

00:28:10.160 you could see why people believed it.

00:28:11.900 But if they're arguing that there was an insurrection without weapons

00:28:17.920 that the Republicans were leading,

00:28:20.200 they're so far into mocking territory

00:28:22.700 that we shouldn't treat it any other way.

00:28:26.900 We should treat it as a fucking joke.

00:28:29.880 And if they had anybody on the Republican side who could do that,

00:28:33.080 and they don't,

00:28:34.240 I don't think they have anybody who can do that,

00:28:35.800 it would be incredible to watch.

00:28:41.040 Now, in the Senate,

00:28:43.680 I would say Senator Kennedy could do that.

00:28:47.560 Am I right?

00:28:48.540 But I don't think he's part of the procession.

00:28:51.560 He'll probably get some good quotes in.

00:28:53.120 Thomas Massey, very capable.

00:28:56.840 I don't know if he's got the stand-up comedian chops.

00:29:00.800 Matt Gaetz,

00:29:02.760 you know, he's got a little baggage on him at the moment,

00:29:06.240 so I think he's sort of on the bench a little bit

00:29:10.080 on some of these big topics.

00:29:14.020 Chip Roy is very effective.

00:29:16.320 So I saw his defense of the Second Amendment,

00:29:19.060 and I thought, you know,

00:29:20.940 if I'd want him to be my lawyer,

00:29:23.120 he was very effective in making his argument,

00:29:26.080 but it wasn't funny,

00:29:27.920 because it was about Holocaust and whatnot.

00:29:30.320 Very effective.

00:29:31.700 But this January 6th stuff,

00:29:34.120 we should be treating as a mockery.

00:29:37.660 It should be treated as a mockery,

00:29:39.860 and it should be used to dismantle the Democrats completely.

00:29:43.540 So they've sort of exposed their soft underbelly,

00:29:46.720 which is that they literally are a hoax operating system.

00:29:53.120 Everything they do requires a hoax,

00:29:55.800 or it doesn't work.

00:29:57.340 Like, you could find the hoax behind every single policy.

00:30:02.740 And then, of course,

00:30:04.940 there's also the mood of the country

00:30:06.640 that's working against the Democrats,

00:30:09.540 because the, you know,

00:30:11.560 Biden's approval level is in the basement,

00:30:13.800 and at least the recent election

00:30:17.380 shows there's some pushback

00:30:18.840 against the progressive agenda

00:30:20.220 with the progressive attorney generals,

00:30:23.580 or progressive prosecutors.

00:30:26.640 And Bill Maher.

00:30:31.760 Bill Maher.

00:30:32.720 Bill Maher is a national asset

00:30:41.400 that I'm not sure we completely understand

00:30:46.920 how powerful that is.

00:30:48.760 Now, he hasn't quite used it

00:30:50.600 to move the needle on a topic in a big way,

00:30:55.540 but imagine if he just took this on

00:30:57.780 and just said,

00:31:00.000 look, you know,

00:31:01.320 we've got a hoax operating system on my team.

00:31:05.860 You know, he could say,

00:31:06.700 he could say, you know,

00:31:08.060 I vote Democrat,

00:31:09.360 and my side has to stop running hoaxes

00:31:13.080 and acting like that's government.

00:31:16.180 Imagine that message.

00:31:18.160 Stop running hoaxes

00:31:19.620 and pretending you're governing.

00:31:21.680 Those are completely different techniques.

00:31:23.680 Yeah, but you'd have to mock it first,

00:31:28.860 and I think he could mock it like nobody could.

00:31:31.700 So, yeah, he'd be great.

00:31:33.980 I feel like people like Bill Maher,

00:31:39.620 and, you know, you could argue Joe Rogan

00:31:41.880 and some other people like that,

00:31:43.260 are a little bit like the

00:31:44.500 break glass in case of emergency people.

00:31:49.600 You know what I mean?

00:31:50.520 I feel like there are some people

00:31:54.280 who are just sort of,

00:31:56.460 you know, in some ways,

00:31:57.400 they're the internet dads.

00:31:59.180 You know, maybe Bill Maher's,

00:32:00.600 ironically, an internet dad.

00:32:02.700 Somebody who's famously childless.

00:32:06.640 But I feel like,

00:32:08.380 yeah, maybe Tulsi,

00:32:09.360 maybe he's another example.

00:32:11.440 You can think of other ones.

00:32:12.940 But I feel like there are some adults

00:32:15.020 who are Elon Musk,

00:32:17.980 people who are capable of seeing both sides

00:32:21.180 with a little bit of clarity,

00:32:23.200 who are sort of like the emergency break glass

00:32:25.620 in case everything goes wrong.

00:32:27.540 It's the people who could tell their own side

00:32:29.300 to calm down.

00:32:32.520 There aren't many of them.

00:32:34.640 So, if you could tell your own team

00:32:36.580 to calm down,

00:32:37.900 you're a national asset.

00:32:38.900 What is club random?

00:32:43.800 Never heard of it.

00:32:48.780 Yeah, Alan Dershowitz

00:32:50.040 says the J6 committee

00:32:52.460 is a Newt McCarthyism.

00:32:54.440 And the arrest of Navarro

00:32:55.580 was unconstitutional.

00:32:57.060 I can't remember the last time

00:32:58.340 I disagreed with Alan Dershowitz.

00:33:00.800 But,

00:33:01.360 any time I find myself

00:33:04.040 disagreeing with him,

00:33:05.400 I immediately discard my old opinion,

00:33:07.440 and just take his opinion.

00:33:09.900 Because the statistical odds

00:33:12.720 that disagreeing with Alan Dershowitz

00:33:15.360 is a good play

00:33:16.160 on a legal constitutional question

00:33:18.520 is pretty bad odds.

00:33:21.840 Right?

00:33:23.020 And every once in a while

00:33:24.000 you could tell yourself,

00:33:24.920 well, I think I got this one.

00:33:26.440 No, you don't.

00:33:27.920 No, you don't.

00:33:28.580 He's better at that than you are.

00:33:29.860 He's way better than that.

00:33:31.520 That's why he's Alan Dershowitz

00:33:32.840 and you're not.

00:33:33.320 The NFL's Carolina Panthers

00:33:41.700 have a new,

00:33:44.400 what do they call them now?

00:33:46.700 Cheerleader.

00:33:47.820 I didn't know if there was

00:33:48.520 a more woke word for that,

00:33:50.120 but I guess there's still cheerleaders.

00:33:51.740 Called Justine Lindsay.

00:33:53.940 And she has revealed

00:33:55.120 that she's a trans cheerleader. 0.55

00:33:57.400 And I just put that out there.

00:34:03.980 And here's what I wondered.

00:34:05.480 Do you remember when

00:34:06.500 the cheerleaders would often be featured 0.99

00:34:10.520 before and after commercials?

00:34:13.360 And you thought to yourself,

00:34:14.980 oh, the showing of the cheerleaders,

00:34:18.720 because they're sort of overtly sexy

00:34:21.820 and dancing provocatively,

00:34:24.200 it's kind of like,

00:34:25.440 it's almost not like a family show.

00:34:28.140 It's like the cheerleaders

00:34:29.320 have gone from cheering

00:34:30.620 to something a little sluttier.

00:34:33.800 And so I'm not wrong

00:34:35.480 that they don't show

00:34:36.160 the cheerleaders anymore, right?

00:34:38.320 Is that correct?

00:34:39.240 They don't really show

00:34:39.920 the cheerleaders.

00:34:41.600 And I'm wondering if the addition

00:34:43.880 of a trans cheerleader

00:34:45.640 will change that.

00:34:48.240 And I wonder if,

00:34:49.680 let's say all of the cheerleaders

00:34:51.180 became LGBTQ,

00:34:54.520 would they start showing them

00:34:55.900 during halftime?

00:34:58.060 And then make a show of it.

00:35:00.480 I'm not saying I recommend it or not.

00:35:03.520 I'm just saying it's a thought experiment.

00:35:06.020 If all the cheerleaders will LGBTQ, 1.00

00:35:09.260 I'm pretty sure that they would show them,

00:35:12.620 wouldn't they?

00:35:13.540 They would get airtime.

00:35:15.000 But at the moment,

00:35:16.740 they're not really shown.

00:35:17.600 I'm not recommending it.

00:35:20.280 It's just a thought experiment.

00:35:22.580 Just wondered.

00:35:24.660 All right.

00:35:25.040 Now, I told you

00:35:26.660 I had a little technical difficulties.

00:35:28.840 So I'm going to check my own Twitter feed here

00:35:35.380 because the things I tweeted

00:35:36.800 were the things I was going to talk about today.

00:35:40.140 Just to make sure I didn't forget anything.

00:35:41.600 Did I forget anything?

00:35:42.220 Are all of you going to be watching the hearings?

00:35:48.780 And who among the Republicans,

00:35:51.940 have the Republicans picked somebody

00:35:53.800 who's going to be sort of their main

00:35:55.700 go-to spokesperson?

00:35:57.880 I'm not sure I'll watch it.

00:36:00.480 I'll probably just get to clips.

00:36:08.700 All right.

00:36:10.520 You're still back on the cheerleading story.

00:36:14.460 You know, I don't know if you've deduced this yet,

00:36:19.180 but part of my fascination

00:36:21.660 with the whole LGBTQ evolution, I guess, 1.00

00:36:27.880 is what it does to our brains.

00:36:31.760 You know, I've always been the

00:36:34.440 let people be people,

00:36:35.900 and it's not my business.

00:36:38.180 So, you know, everybody's the same, blah, blah.

00:36:40.280 Everybody's the same because we're all different,

00:36:42.000 basically, is my philosophy.

00:36:44.080 But the whole thing is fascinating.

00:36:49.280 Just watching how much trouble people have

00:36:51.280 incorporating it.

00:36:53.600 So this is something else.

00:36:55.460 So the RNC research,

00:36:57.880 Twitter feed has all these bad clips of Biden

00:37:00.020 talking to Jimmy Kimmel.

00:37:02.040 And here's something Biden actually said.

00:37:04.900 Because Kimmel was talking about

00:37:06.280 not enough progress on climate change.

00:37:09.360 And Biden says,

00:37:10.260 we have made some progress.

00:37:12.520 The reduction on the use of oil

00:37:14.320 also increases the need to find alternatives.

00:37:16.880 What?

00:37:21.780 He actually said that.

00:37:23.840 Let's see if I can play it,

00:37:24.860 because you're not even going to believe he said that.

00:37:26.560 It's moving.

00:37:27.320 It's moving.

00:37:27.620 Hold on.

00:37:28.040 A climate is something we could all look back at these days

00:37:33.520 and go, oh, my God.

00:37:36.000 But we have made some progress there.

00:37:38.300 It was 500,000.

00:37:38.600 Some, some.

00:37:40.100 But it's moving.

00:37:41.580 It's moving.

00:37:42.840 My mother used to say, 0.61

00:37:43.860 out of anything bad,

00:37:44.600 some good will come if you look hard enough for it.

00:37:46.520 So the reduction on the use of oil

00:37:49.000 also increases the need to find alternatives.

00:37:52.400 A climate is something.

00:37:54.840 Do you hear what Kimmel said?

00:37:56.860 So he goes,

00:37:58.920 the reduction on the use of oil

00:38:00.780 also increases the need to find alternatives,

00:38:03.360 is what Biden says.

00:38:04.500 And Kimmel goes, uh-huh.

00:38:06.980 Uh-huh.

00:38:07.940 And changed the subject immediately.

00:38:10.780 Uh-huh.

00:38:13.180 So you're saying that failing,

00:38:16.520 increases the pressure

00:38:19.240 to find something that doesn't fail.

00:38:23.160 And I'm thinking,

00:38:24.740 isn't that always the case?

00:38:28.100 Isn't that always the case?

00:38:31.420 That if you fail at something,

00:38:33.300 it increases your incentive to try harder to not fail?

00:38:37.360 I feel like that's what he said.

00:38:41.440 And you could see Kimmel

00:38:43.400 talking to him like he was a dementia patient.

00:38:46.960 Because what do you say to that?

00:38:49.280 Like, you don't have to be an economist to say,

00:38:52.120 no, seriously,

00:38:52.860 you're saying that

00:38:53.540 that our failure,

00:38:56.240 our failure to have enough energy

00:38:58.400 is really a positive in disguise

00:39:00.700 because it'll make us really want to

00:39:02.820 find a way to not die.

00:39:05.560 He's basically saying,

00:39:06.560 we've incentivized you by giving you,

00:39:09.280 you know,

00:39:10.040 an option of starving

00:39:11.180 or finding some alternative really quickly.

00:39:16.160 It's just shocking.

00:39:17.160 And then Biden talks about

00:39:23.220 the interracial couples on TV.

00:39:25.760 But you have to hear this part.

00:39:26.780 First of all,

00:39:49.580 didn't he say the opposite of what he meant?

00:39:52.180 He said,

00:39:52.660 when was the last time

00:39:53.620 you saw a biracial couple on TV?

00:39:57.160 To which I say,

00:39:58.360 every time I turn it on,

00:40:00.380 when was the last time

00:40:01.680 you didn't see a biracial couple? 0.97

00:40:03.460 I haven't even turned on the TV

00:40:05.060 and seen a heterosexual couple

00:40:06.600 making out lately.

00:40:08.900 Like,

00:40:09.420 I mean,

00:40:09.660 you have to look pretty hard

00:40:10.400 to find any heterosexuals

00:40:12.700 who are kissing on TV.

00:40:14.700 So I think he said the opposite.

00:40:18.700 I think he was saying that

00:40:19.720 you do see a lot of biracial couples on TV.

00:40:24.540 Did he just say it backwards

00:40:25.940 to how he meant it?

00:40:29.000 I don't know what TV he's watching.

00:40:30.860 Is he watching, like,

00:40:31.760 Gunsmoke or something?

00:40:33.320 Is he watching Matlock,

00:40:35.020 like, repeats or something?

00:40:37.600 Like,

00:40:38.180 TV is,

00:40:39.160 is so,

00:40:41.660 so inclusive,

00:40:44.000 it,

00:40:44.920 it steps on its own ability

00:40:46.520 to entertain.

00:40:48.000 I'm all for the inclusiveness.

00:40:49.920 But it does make it harder

00:40:50.880 to write scripts.

00:40:51.980 You know,

00:40:52.560 it's just an extra variable

00:40:53.720 that you,

00:40:54.580 you put it in there

00:40:55.380 and mix,

00:40:55.900 mixing's a little harder

00:40:56.840 for the writers.

00:40:59.840 But,

00:41:00.580 it's good overall.

00:41:02.780 Anyway,

00:41:04.740 yeah,

00:41:05.140 let's see what else is going on.

00:41:06.620 so I guess

00:41:11.120 Liz Cheney

00:41:13.420 is getting smoked

00:41:14.880 by her GOP

00:41:16.740 primary challenger.

00:41:18.360 Are you surprised?

00:41:20.300 So Liz Cheney

00:41:21.160 will be out of a job,

00:41:22.520 it looks like.

00:41:23.660 She'll probably get promoted 1.00

00:41:24.680 to president

00:41:26.620 for the Democrats

00:41:28.040 or something.

00:41:29.980 I saw a Brad Todd tweet

00:41:31.980 in which he shows

00:41:34.240 a copy of the New York Times

00:41:35.480 and here's what he tweets.

00:41:37.120 A foiled plot

00:41:37.920 to assassinate

00:41:38.740 a Supreme Court justice

00:41:40.100 days before

00:41:41.400 the biggest opinion

00:41:42.360 in 50 years

00:41:43.440 does not make page A1

00:41:45.720 of the New York Times.

00:41:47.420 It's buried

00:41:48.260 on the bottom

00:41:48.940 of A20.

00:41:50.640 Would it be on A20

00:41:51.680 if it were,

00:41:52.600 if it,

00:41:53.060 should have said were,

00:41:54.060 Sotomayor with a gun

00:41:56.040 case pending?

00:42:02.060 Isn't it weird

00:42:02.920 that the New York Times

00:42:04.420 is embarrassed

00:42:05.120 to do the news?

00:42:08.480 Because if the New York Times

00:42:09.800 said this is the news,

00:42:11.660 that there was this

00:42:12.320 assassination attempt

00:42:13.500 on a Supreme Court justice,

00:42:16.020 if they said

00:42:17.520 that's the news,

00:42:18.740 it's hard to avoid

00:42:19.940 the fact that

00:42:20.980 Chuck Schumer

00:42:22.300 saying that

00:42:23.120 these justices

00:42:24.080 would, you know,

00:42:25.380 would reap the whirlwind

00:42:26.540 and they would pay for it.

00:42:28.200 It's hard not to include

00:42:29.420 that in the story.

00:42:31.040 So literally,

00:42:32.920 am I wrong

00:42:33.700 that the New York Times

00:42:34.600 is trying to disappear

00:42:35.660 the story?

00:42:36.680 Because if the public

00:42:37.740 knew this story,

00:42:38.820 it would change everything

00:42:39.720 about the kangaroo court

00:42:42.000 that's going on tonight.

00:42:43.940 This is everything

00:42:44.620 about managing your,

00:42:46.820 you know,

00:42:47.220 the propaganda,

00:42:48.940 isn't it?

00:42:49.860 That's what it looks like.

00:42:50.720 I mean,

00:42:50.920 it just looks like

00:42:51.520 propaganda management.

00:42:58.060 Then,

00:42:58.620 then here's Biden

00:43:00.120 talking about

00:43:00.680 sending his opponents

00:43:01.740 to jail.

00:43:04.980 Look,

00:43:06.060 the Republicans

00:43:06.520 don't play it square.

00:43:07.560 Why do you play it square?

00:43:09.080 Yeah.

00:43:09.300 Well, guess what?

00:43:10.660 If we do the same thing

00:43:11.640 they do,

00:43:12.000 our democracy

00:43:12.620 is to literally

00:43:13.100 be in jeopardy.

00:43:15.220 It's not a joke.

00:43:17.140 And I understand

00:43:18.400 their argument,

00:43:19.080 but also it's like

00:43:19.840 you're playing monopoly

00:43:20.780 with somebody

00:43:21.960 who, you know,

00:43:23.260 won't pass go

00:43:24.140 and won't follow

00:43:24.780 any of the rules

00:43:25.480 and how do you ever

00:43:26.400 make any progress

00:43:27.520 if they're not

00:43:28.460 following the rules?

00:43:30.080 One's got to send

00:43:30.500 them to jail,

00:43:31.240 you know.

00:43:32.380 There's that little

00:43:33.380 box.

00:43:34.260 So Biden actually said

00:43:38.060 that Republicans

00:43:39.500 should be sent

00:43:40.380 to jail

00:43:41.020 for, quote,

00:43:43.060 not following

00:43:43.820 the rules.

00:43:46.340 Not following

00:43:47.040 the rules.

00:43:49.200 Now,

00:43:49.640 if he said

00:43:50.060 for breaking

00:43:50.540 the law,

00:43:51.860 then even

00:43:52.780 Republicans

00:43:53.320 would say,

00:43:53.940 oh yeah,

00:43:54.760 of course.

00:43:55.920 You break the law,

00:43:56.820 you go to jail.

00:43:57.440 That has nothing

00:43:58.500 to do with

00:43:58.880 your party

00:43:59.260 affiliation.

00:44:00.900 But he's

00:44:01.600 literally saying

00:44:02.320 break a rule.

00:44:03.920 Do you know

00:44:04.400 who breaks rules?

00:44:06.220 Everybody.

00:44:06.740 Who's not

00:44:08.840 breaking a rule?

00:44:11.700 And the Democrats

00:44:13.140 get to decide

00:44:13.920 that the Republicans

00:44:14.660 go to jail

00:44:15.340 when they break

00:44:15.860 a rule?

00:44:16.840 I mean,

00:44:17.060 that's a pretty

00:44:18.160 loose standard

00:44:19.080 there.

00:44:20.100 Yeah.

00:44:20.720 Because it's sort

00:44:21.440 of subjective

00:44:22.060 who's breaking

00:44:22.720 the rules,

00:44:23.360 right?

00:44:25.280 Who's breaking

00:44:26.060 the rules

00:44:26.500 and who's using

00:44:27.220 the rules?

00:44:28.660 I mean,

00:44:29.280 I can't believe,

00:44:32.260 well,

00:44:32.640 let me say it

00:44:33.080 directly.

00:44:33.600 The only reason

00:44:34.460 that Biden can get

00:44:35.360 away with this

00:44:36.280 level of incompetence

00:44:37.660 is that we all

00:44:39.700 see it.

00:44:42.680 Am I wrong?

00:44:44.160 The only reason

00:44:45.000 you can get away

00:44:45.620 with it is you

00:44:46.160 don't have to

00:44:46.660 argue about it

00:44:47.420 anymore.

00:44:48.340 The Democrats

00:44:49.080 can see it.

00:44:50.780 So I think we

00:44:51.680 all just accept

00:44:52.520 that that's our

00:44:53.200 situation.

00:44:54.500 And we hope

00:44:55.080 that whoever

00:44:55.620 is guiding him

00:44:57.040 behind the scenes

00:44:57.900 doesn't have a

00:44:59.360 twitchy nuclear

00:45:01.220 trigger figure.

00:45:02.620 Basically,

00:45:03.180 that's our best

00:45:03.680 bet,

00:45:04.200 is that whoever

00:45:04.680 is running

00:45:05.060 him isn't

00:45:05.440 crazy.

00:45:07.480 Whoever that

00:45:08.260 is.

00:45:13.400 All right.

00:45:14.120 So I think,

00:45:15.400 oh,

00:45:16.460 so Jeff

00:45:17.100 Pilkington

00:45:17.820 tweeted to

00:45:19.340 my attention

00:45:19.960 a tweet

00:45:20.740 by Juan

00:45:21.320 Morales.

00:45:22.600 And we're

00:45:23.240 talking about

00:45:23.720 how many

00:45:24.300 Twitter bots

00:45:25.300 and trolls

00:45:25.840 and spam

00:45:26.580 bots and

00:45:27.060 stuff like

00:45:27.440 that are

00:45:27.720 there.

00:45:28.660 And Juan

00:45:29.160 is saying

00:45:29.440 the better

00:45:29.820 metric,

00:45:31.400 instead of

00:45:32.120 counting what

00:45:32.960 percentage of

00:45:33.700 trolls there

00:45:34.200 are,

00:45:34.940 he says,

00:45:35.360 the better

00:45:35.620 metric is

00:45:36.460 what percentage

00:45:37.080 of engagement

00:45:37.900 the likes

00:45:39.240 and retweets

00:45:39.900 and comments

00:45:40.380 is coming

00:45:40.860 from spam

00:45:41.480 accounts.

00:45:42.520 He said,

00:45:43.000 a small share

00:45:43.740 of accounts

00:45:44.300 can have

00:45:44.740 large impacts.

00:45:45.540 In 2013,

00:45:47.120 Twitter closed

00:45:47.840 spam accounts

00:45:48.780 that were

00:45:49.280 less than

00:45:49.960 a half of

00:45:51.180 one percent

00:45:51.780 of Maduro's

00:45:52.880 followers,

00:45:54.000 and his

00:45:54.600 retweets

00:45:55.100 dropped by

00:45:55.700 81%.

00:45:56.860 So less

00:46:00.500 than one

00:46:01.000 percent of

00:46:02.000 Maduro's

00:46:02.800 followers

00:46:03.320 were 81%

00:46:04.500 of his

00:46:04.840 activity.

00:46:07.700 So that's

00:46:09.240 a good

00:46:09.500 question.

00:46:10.380 Maybe the

00:46:10.820 bots are,

00:46:11.720 you know,

00:46:11.960 what if they're

00:46:12.580 80% of the

00:46:13.600 political

00:46:14.220 conversation?

00:46:16.340 You know,

00:46:16.600 it wouldn't

00:46:16.780 be 80%

00:46:17.300 of other

00:46:17.640 stuff.

00:46:19.580 Anyway,

00:46:21.220 Tom Cotton

00:46:24.320 tweeted,

00:46:25.860 $5 gas

00:46:26.800 is not

00:46:27.240 an accident,

00:46:28.120 it's not

00:46:28.560 an unintended

00:46:29.140 consequence,

00:46:30.040 it's by

00:46:30.480 design.

00:46:31.460 Now,

00:46:32.000 that's the

00:46:32.360 sort of

00:46:32.700 statement

00:46:33.020 that I

00:46:34.220 would have

00:46:34.520 regarded

00:46:34.940 as a

00:46:36.620 little too

00:46:37.060 far,

00:46:38.120 but not

00:46:40.060 anymore,

00:46:40.940 because Biden

00:46:42.340 actually touted

00:46:43.580 our failure

00:46:46.180 to have

00:46:46.540 enough,

00:46:46.840 you know,

00:46:47.140 gas and

00:46:48.020 oil,

00:46:48.980 he touted

00:46:49.780 that as

00:46:50.600 an asset,

00:46:52.620 because it

00:46:53.440 makes us

00:46:53.740 try harder

00:46:54.220 for

00:46:54.520 substitutes.

00:46:56.140 So,

00:46:56.360 yeah,

00:46:56.780 I think

00:46:57.200 Biden

00:46:57.840 confirmed

00:46:58.240 this,

00:46:58.900 didn't he?

00:47:00.720 So,

00:47:01.360 when Tom

00:47:01.800 Cotton

00:47:02.000 says it's

00:47:02.420 not an

00:47:02.700 accident,

00:47:03.220 it's by

00:47:05.560 design,

00:47:07.000 I think

00:47:07.800 that that

00:47:08.480 is now

00:47:08.860 confirmed

00:47:09.320 by the

00:47:09.860 President

00:47:10.160 of the

00:47:10.380 United

00:47:10.560 States.

00:47:14.220 So,

00:47:14.740 Tom

00:47:16.660 Cotton

00:47:17.020 is

00:47:17.560 definitely

00:47:19.420 one of

00:47:19.740 the better

00:47:20.020 communicators

00:47:20.880 and most

00:47:21.920 capable of

00:47:22.680 the

00:47:22.820 Republicans

00:47:23.300 but if

00:47:26.100 he also

00:47:26.600 had a

00:47:27.240 sense of

00:47:27.600 humor,

00:47:29.220 he would

00:47:29.540 be

00:47:30.100 president.

00:47:35.520 All right.

00:47:38.680 Jack

00:47:39.360 Posobiec is

00:47:40.940 retweeting a

00:47:42.240 deleted tweet.

00:47:44.440 So,

00:47:44.820 let me give

00:47:45.100 you an 0.64

00:47:45.880 example of

00:47:46.400 something that

00:47:47.040 somebody actually

00:47:47.920 thought they

00:47:48.380 could put on

00:47:48.920 Twitter.

00:47:51.920 He says,

00:47:53.180 so this is

00:47:53.800 somebody named

00:47:54.300 Simon Gwynn,

00:47:55.800 who's got a,

00:47:57.100 he's a blue

00:47:57.600 check and he's

00:47:58.160 got a little

00:47:58.480 Ukrainian flag

00:47:59.340 there.

00:48:00.020 And he

00:48:00.540 tweeted,

00:48:01.040 but I guess

00:48:01.420 he deleted

00:48:01.800 it.

00:48:02.600 He said,

00:48:03.140 interesting

00:48:03.500 real-life

00:48:04.300 trolley

00:48:05.080 problem in

00:48:05.780 America now. 0.53

00:48:06.980 If you had

00:48:07.820 the chance

00:48:08.300 to kill

00:48:08.720 Clarence

00:48:09.260 Thomas and

00:48:09.900 Samuel Alito,

00:48:11.720 the two

00:48:12.220 oldest right-wing

00:48:13.400 Supreme Court

00:48:14.100 judges,

00:48:15.180 should you do

00:48:15.800 it while

00:48:16.200 Biden can get

00:48:17.100 his nominees

00:48:17.640 to replace

00:48:18.380 them,

00:48:18.740 confirmed?

00:48:21.340 What?

00:48:22.700 And then he

00:48:23.820 followed up

00:48:24.640 with,

00:48:25.040 Simon did,

00:48:26.300 it's interesting

00:48:27.020 as an abstract

00:48:27.760 question,

00:48:28.880 but becomes a

00:48:29.540 real conundrum

00:48:30.220 if, say,

00:48:31.360 you're terminally

00:48:32.100 ill,

00:48:32.760 if you're

00:48:33.460 terminally ill

00:48:34.280 and you have

00:48:35.360 little to lose

00:48:36.220 yourself,

00:48:37.500 but know it

00:48:38.080 could save

00:48:38.540 many women's

00:48:39.300 lives in the

00:48:39.940 future.

00:48:41.160 So it's

00:48:41.540 basically an

00:48:42.400 argument for

00:48:43.560 murdering

00:48:44.040 Hitler. 0.57

00:48:45.400 And the

00:48:45.740 argument is,

00:48:46.600 but Hitler's 0.92

00:48:47.080 here and

00:48:48.240 Hitler is 0.96

00:48:48.840 the Supreme

00:48:50.200 Court,

00:48:51.200 the conservatives

00:48:51.820 of the

00:48:52.240 Supreme

00:48:52.520 Court.

00:48:54.060 Now,

00:48:55.100 as Jack

00:48:56.200 Posobiec

00:48:56.900 noted,

00:48:58.360 he deleted

00:48:59.820 those.

00:49:01.240 And I

00:49:02.260 don't know

00:49:02.500 if it

00:49:02.740 violated any

00:49:03.500 Twitter

00:49:03.980 guidelines,

00:49:04.620 I think,

00:49:04.900 because it

00:49:05.100 was sort

00:49:05.380 of a

00:49:05.580 thought

00:49:05.800 experiment,

00:49:07.040 but it

00:49:08.520 really puts

00:49:12.320 into context

00:49:15.060 that Republicans

00:49:16.880 are being

00:49:17.420 hunted.

00:49:19.220 Now,

00:49:19.920 you all

00:49:20.260 remember my

00:49:21.080 most mocked

00:49:22.800 prediction,

00:49:25.220 that Republicans

00:49:26.160 would be hunted

00:49:26.920 if Biden

00:49:29.000 got elected.

00:49:31.400 Is that what

00:49:32.380 the kangaroo

00:49:32.960 court is doing?

00:49:34.220 I mean,

00:49:34.500 it's basically

00:49:35.140 part of the

00:49:36.500 process of

00:49:37.080 hunting.

00:49:37.340 isn't this

00:49:40.500 Simon

00:49:40.780 Gwynn

00:49:41.400 tweet?

00:49:43.180 Very close

00:49:44.060 to suggesting

00:49:44.880 that under

00:49:45.900 the right

00:49:46.320 circumstances,

00:49:47.680 a rational

00:49:48.400 person would

00:49:50.320 hunt and

00:49:50.880 kill

00:49:51.220 Republicans.

00:49:53.620 That's how I

00:49:54.280 read it.

00:49:55.160 I read it as

00:49:56.140 there's a

00:49:56.720 situation in

00:49:57.540 which a

00:49:57.940 rational

00:49:58.400 American

00:49:59.000 working for

00:50:00.500 patriotic

00:50:01.180 ideals would

00:50:03.460 have a good

00:50:03.960 reason to

00:50:04.500 murder a

00:50:05.100 Supreme

00:50:05.420 Court justice

00:50:06.000 who was

00:50:06.540 conservative.

00:50:11.080 I don't

00:50:11.780 know.

00:50:13.920 All right.

00:50:17.640 Yeah,

00:50:18.360 and, you

00:50:18.960 know, if

00:50:19.260 you, and

00:50:20.020 as Doc

00:50:20.560 Anarchy said 0.92

00:50:21.300 on Twitter,

00:50:22.040 a Democrat

00:50:22.520 traveled hundreds

00:50:23.300 of miles across

00:50:24.040 state lines with

00:50:24.880 a gun to

00:50:26.080 Justice

00:50:26.500 Kavanaugh's

00:50:27.080 home and

00:50:27.440 attempted to

00:50:28.040 kill him.

00:50:29.040 Sounds like

00:50:29.660 Republicans are

00:50:30.460 being hunted.

00:50:31.960 That's what

00:50:33.340 hunting is.

00:50:34.800 You get a

00:50:35.380 gun and

00:50:35.760 then you

00:50:36.020 go look for

00:50:36.540 the mammal

00:50:37.520 you're going

00:50:37.900 to shoot or

00:50:39.540 bird or

00:50:40.100 whatever.

00:50:43.180 Wow.

00:50:48.520 And I

00:50:49.240 did watch

00:50:50.060 the clip

00:50:51.840 of Representative

00:50:53.040 Chip Roy

00:50:53.600 defending the

00:50:55.540 Second Amendment.

00:50:56.480 So I

00:50:56.740 tweeted that.

00:50:57.580 Townhall.com

00:50:58.360 had the

00:50:58.820 video.

00:51:00.180 And I

00:51:02.200 would say

00:51:02.500 it's the

00:51:02.900 strongest

00:51:03.800 short

00:51:06.880 argument I've

00:51:07.800 heard for

00:51:08.140 the Second

00:51:08.520 Amendment.

00:51:09.400 Because he

00:51:09.880 uses a

00:51:10.960 laundry list

00:51:11.720 persuasion

00:51:13.180 where he

00:51:14.520 gives a

00:51:15.080 number of

00:51:15.600 notable

00:51:16.040 examples where

00:51:16.960 the population

00:51:17.740 had their

00:51:18.660 guns taken

00:51:19.160 away and

00:51:19.640 then they

00:51:19.940 were rounded

00:51:21.500 up and

00:51:21.860 killed.

00:51:22.100 You know,

00:51:22.480 the Armenians,

00:51:23.440 the Jews,

00:51:25.220 blah, blah.

00:51:25.560 Pol Pot. 0.89

00:51:28.780 And when you

00:51:29.900 hear them all

00:51:30.420 together,

00:51:31.660 they're very

00:51:33.580 persuasive.

00:51:35.240 Now again,

00:51:37.720 laundry list

00:51:38.760 persuasion

00:51:39.360 is persuasion

00:51:41.780 that's not just

00:51:42.580 fact, right?

00:51:43.840 So you have to be

00:51:44.500 careful because it

00:51:45.140 can be more

00:51:45.660 persuasive than it

00:51:46.580 needs to be.

00:51:47.220 but put the

00:51:52.560 Rittenhouse

00:51:52.960 filter on it.

00:51:54.260 Put the

00:51:54.880 Rittenhouse

00:51:55.280 filter on it.

00:51:57.220 That he was

00:51:58.320 haunted.

00:52:00.360 Yeah.

00:52:01.220 I mean,

00:52:01.620 Rittenhouse was

00:52:02.280 literally haunted.

00:52:05.820 I guess I

00:52:06.600 shouldn't say

00:52:06.920 literally.

00:52:10.700 All right.

00:52:11.320 All right.

00:52:17.220 Civilized

00:52:22.080 societies

00:52:22.640 ban

00:52:23.160 its

00:52:23.340 citizens

00:52:23.840 from

00:52:24.680 brandishing

00:52:25.240 weapons of

00:52:25.920 war.

00:52:26.860 Do you

00:52:27.160 know why

00:52:27.520 a civilized

00:52:28.280 society

00:52:28.900 can

00:52:30.400 ban its 0.99

00:52:31.420 citizens

00:52:31.840 from

00:52:32.220 brandishing

00:52:32.780 weapons of

00:52:33.420 war?

00:52:34.720 Anybody?

00:52:35.340 Anybody who's

00:52:36.220 good

00:52:36.840 understanding

00:52:37.940 the world?

00:52:39.020 Why is it

00:52:39.600 that,

00:52:40.020 because that

00:52:40.560 was a comment

00:52:41.100 I'm just

00:52:41.440 reading on

00:52:41.800 YouTube,

00:52:42.940 why is it

00:52:43.520 that civilized

00:52:44.340 countries

00:52:44.820 can ban

00:52:45.840 weapons of

00:52:46.560 war from

00:52:47.060 their citizens?

00:52:48.040 Why can

00:52:48.460 they do

00:52:48.720 that?

00:52:50.940 Because

00:52:51.380 Americans have 0.78

00:52:52.080 weapons.

00:52:53.880 That's the

00:52:54.440 only reason.

00:52:56.480 Do you

00:52:57.040 know why

00:52:57.300 Great Britain

00:52:57.780 doesn't need

00:52:58.240 a lot of

00:52:58.520 weapons?

00:53:00.520 Because if

00:53:01.160 somebody tried

00:53:01.540 to invade

00:53:02.040 Great Britain,

00:53:02.840 the United

00:53:03.220 States would

00:53:03.900 help them.

00:53:06.020 Right?

00:53:06.980 And do you

00:53:07.980 know why

00:53:08.340 they don't

00:53:09.000 have to worry

00:53:09.480 that the

00:53:09.820 United States

00:53:10.480 gets invaded

00:53:11.400 and taken

00:53:11.900 over so

00:53:12.940 that they

00:53:13.320 won't be

00:53:13.680 there later

00:53:14.240 in case they

00:53:15.060 need help?

00:53:16.300 It's because

00:53:16.900 we have

00:53:17.140 guns.

00:53:18.100 You can't

00:53:18.500 take us

00:53:18.820 over.

00:53:19.840 You could

00:53:20.120 try.

00:53:20.860 It wouldn't

00:53:21.380 work.

00:53:24.580 So a lot

00:53:25.220 of the

00:53:25.420 places that

00:53:25.940 we look at

00:53:26.380 as our

00:53:26.620 role models,

00:53:28.220 thank you

00:53:28.940 John,

00:53:29.500 a lot of

00:53:29.840 the places

00:53:30.200 that we

00:53:30.520 look at

00:53:30.880 as our

00:53:31.100 role models

00:53:31.700 are just

00:53:32.460 freeloaders.

00:53:34.400 Your role

00:53:35.460 model is a 0.89

00:53:36.460 fucking

00:53:36.720 freeloader.

00:53:38.680 They're

00:53:39.040 free riders.

00:53:40.980 The Americans

00:53:41.540 take the

00:53:42.100 risks.

00:53:42.940 The Americans

00:53:43.520 take the

00:53:44.780 deaths.

00:53:45.880 They accept

00:53:46.400 the internal

00:53:47.340 amount of

00:53:47.940 murders that

00:53:48.500 do come

00:53:48.840 along with

00:53:49.200 gun ownership.

00:53:50.660 We take

00:53:51.820 extreme death

00:53:54.000 to make sure

00:53:55.460 that there's

00:53:55.900 one place

00:53:56.540 on earth

00:53:57.060 you're not

00:53:58.280 going to

00:53:58.520 fucking

00:53:58.760 conquer.

00:54:01.600 That's it.

00:54:03.360 It's basically

00:54:04.200 America is the

00:54:05.240 engine of

00:54:05.700 freedom for

00:54:06.180 the rest of

00:54:06.580 the world,

00:54:07.220 and the rest

00:54:07.860 of the world

00:54:08.240 knows it on

00:54:08.880 some level.

00:54:09.480 That's why

00:54:09.760 they don't

00:54:10.080 need big

00:54:10.480 armies.

00:54:12.240 Because we'd

00:54:13.000 be there in

00:54:13.400 a heartbeat

00:54:13.700 for one of

00:54:15.900 our allies.

00:54:19.400 Yeah.

00:54:20.240 So don't

00:54:21.060 compare us

00:54:21.480 to freeloaders.

00:54:23.940 Compare us

00:54:24.380 to people

00:54:24.720 who are

00:54:24.940 paying their

00:54:26.480 full freight.

00:54:28.140 Then you've

00:54:28.900 got a

00:54:29.060 comparison.

00:54:33.160 Yeah, it's

00:54:33.740 easy to be

00:54:34.260 Costa Rica,

00:54:34.980 isn't it?

00:54:36.420 So Costa Rica

00:54:37.580 is no

00:54:38.380 military, right?

00:54:39.220 They have

00:54:39.480 zero military,

00:54:40.340 I believe.

00:54:41.560 And, you

00:54:42.380 know, they've

00:54:43.820 got great...

00:54:45.380 And Costa

00:54:46.000 Rica also

00:54:46.560 doesn't exploit

00:54:47.640 its mineral

00:54:48.880 resources that

00:54:50.480 it has.

00:54:52.080 Rather, they're

00:54:53.040 trying to be a

00:54:53.700 green, touristy

00:54:55.340 country.

00:54:56.100 Do you know

00:54:56.480 why Costa Rica

00:54:57.540 can be just a

00:54:58.440 green, touristy

00:54:59.500 country with

00:55:00.200 no military?

00:55:01.920 It's because of

00:55:02.720 the United

00:55:03.080 States.

00:55:04.000 It's because

00:55:04.700 they're freeloaders.

00:55:06.360 They're smart.

00:55:07.760 They're doing

00:55:08.140 exactly what I

00:55:09.020 would do.

00:55:09.480 I mean, Costa

00:55:10.140 Rica is one

00:55:10.640 of the best

00:55:11.620 run countries,

00:55:12.500 in my opinion.

00:55:13.420 Like, strategy

00:55:14.040 wise, it's

00:55:15.500 really, you

00:55:16.220 know, well

00:55:16.480 run.

00:55:18.860 But it's

00:55:20.560 only because

00:55:21.440 it's free.

00:55:22.680 Like, it

00:55:23.200 doesn't take any

00:55:24.040 kind of genius

00:55:24.600 to say, well,

00:55:25.240 we've got free

00:55:25.860 stuff, let's

00:55:26.440 use it.

00:55:28.800 Switzerland is

00:55:29.580 full of guns,

00:55:30.420 and also there's

00:55:31.040 no reason to

00:55:31.640 attack Switzerland.

00:55:34.060 Geographically,

00:55:34.520 they're sort of

00:55:34.980 irrelevant.

00:55:35.380 And,

00:55:35.600 the United

00:55:43.820 States is an

00:55:44.520 economy, not

00:55:45.340 really a

00:55:45.760 country.

00:55:47.260 I'd have to

00:55:47.980 think about that

00:55:48.580 for a while.

00:55:50.120 All right, let's

00:55:50.580 think about that

00:55:51.180 together.

00:55:52.280 The United

00:55:53.020 States is an

00:55:53.840 economy, not a

00:55:55.340 country.

00:55:57.480 Huh.

00:55:58.340 Provocative.

00:55:59.260 I like it.

00:55:59.720 All right.

00:56:03.500 You never see a

00:56:04.620 Costa Rican

00:56:05.240 illegal immigrant.

00:56:07.800 Boom.

00:56:09.600 All right, I

00:56:10.020 live in

00:56:10.460 California, so

00:56:11.520 I have, you

00:56:12.740 know, personally

00:56:13.220 met, like, every

00:56:14.780 kind of immigrant

00:56:15.560 you could possibly

00:56:16.380 meet.

00:56:17.700 I've never met

00:56:18.640 one from Costa

00:56:19.320 Rica.

00:56:20.340 That is exactly

00:56:21.140 correct.

00:56:22.700 I've met

00:56:23.400 probably every

00:56:24.320 other Central

00:56:25.140 American type.

00:56:27.400 Well, maybe not.

00:56:28.700 I mean, I haven't

00:56:29.440 really thought about

00:56:30.000 it that hard.

00:56:30.680 But, I've never

00:56:31.560 met a Costa

00:56:32.180 Rican immigrant.

00:56:33.140 You're right.

00:56:33.720 Because, in

00:56:34.660 Costa Rica, you

00:56:35.400 can just get a

00:56:36.020 job.

00:56:38.180 You know, they're

00:56:39.120 doing a good job

00:56:39.740 there.

00:56:47.000 I'm being

00:56:47.560 challenged.

00:56:48.660 All right, here's

00:56:49.020 my challenge, in

00:56:50.340 all caps, from

00:56:52.140 the right-lane

00:56:52.760 bandit.

00:56:53.400 He says, I

00:56:53.820 challenge you to

00:56:54.520 look at murder

00:56:55.040 rate by race of

00:56:56.020 USA compared to

00:56:57.060 other countries.

00:56:58.420 No difference.

00:56:59.440 So, the argument

00:57:02.540 would be that

00:57:04.200 white people in 0.69

00:57:05.240 America have a

00:57:07.300 murder rate that

00:57:08.000 would be similar to,

00:57:09.000 say, white people

00:57:09.760 in France.

00:57:11.420 Is that true?

00:57:14.380 I don't know.

00:57:15.160 To me, that has

00:57:15.840 more to do with

00:57:16.360 economic situation.

00:57:18.240 Oh, somebody's

00:57:27.580 saying that the

00:57:28.860 Joe Biden

00:57:31.780 comment was

00:57:33.000 Rupard, taking

00:57:34.020 that out of

00:57:34.420 context, because

00:57:35.800 when he said you

00:57:36.400 could send him to

00:57:37.120 jail, that it was

00:57:38.840 in the joke

00:57:39.840 context of

00:57:41.000 playing Monopoly.

00:57:41.920 I accept that

00:57:44.400 clarification, but

00:57:46.440 I don't know that

00:57:47.200 that changes it.

00:57:48.720 Does it?

00:57:50.280 If the

00:57:51.180 President of the

00:57:51.720 United States

00:57:52.280 jokes that his

00:57:55.320 political opponents

00:57:56.280 should go to

00:57:57.020 jail, I don't

00:57:58.400 think it matters

00:57:59.220 that it was in

00:58:01.180 the context of

00:58:02.240 Monopoly and

00:58:02.900 Monopoly has a

00:58:03.720 go-to-jail

00:58:04.280 function.

00:58:05.120 Even if you

00:58:05.860 knew that, I

00:58:08.080 mean, that gives

00:58:09.760 me a little

00:58:10.180 context, so

00:58:11.460 that's a good

00:58:11.920 clarification, but

00:58:13.520 I don't think that

00:58:14.220 matters, does it?

00:58:16.060 Because it's still

00:58:16.880 part of normalizing

00:58:18.580 it, isn't it?

00:58:20.340 I mean, the

00:58:20.760 reason that you

00:58:21.400 don't let, or

00:58:23.060 let's say society

00:58:24.260 does not want

00:58:26.000 you to be able to

00:58:26.760 tell horrible

00:58:27.500 jokes about,

00:58:29.340 you know, let's

00:58:29.780 say the LGBTQ

00:58:30.780 community or

00:58:31.860 women or 0.69

00:58:32.620 minorities, the

00:58:34.040 reason that you

00:58:34.920 don't want to be

00:58:35.460 able to talk

00:58:36.180 about them in a

00:58:38.040 jokingly insulting

00:58:39.300 criminal way is

00:58:41.760 that it becomes

00:58:42.420 normalized, and

00:58:43.840 somebody thinks,

00:58:44.480 oh, that's just

00:58:45.000 the way we treat

00:58:46.800 that group.

00:58:47.800 If we can say

00:58:49.060 things about

00:58:49.680 them, then we

00:58:50.860 can certainly

00:58:51.260 just do things

00:58:52.080 to them, because

00:58:52.560 that must be

00:58:53.020 what everybody

00:58:53.500 feels.

00:58:54.180 We're saying

00:58:54.620 it right out

00:58:55.040 loud.

00:58:56.840 So there's no

00:58:58.040 way that the

00:58:58.660 Monopoly thing

00:58:59.420 softens the

00:59:00.140 fact that Biden

00:59:01.560 just normalized

00:59:02.600 locking up

00:59:03.240 Republicans by

00:59:06.380 joking about

00:59:07.240 it, like,

00:59:08.040 ah, no big

00:59:08.520 deal.

00:59:08.720 Yeah, lock

00:59:09.420 them up.

00:59:10.940 Now, when

00:59:12.620 Trump said about

00:59:13.860 Hillary Clinton,

00:59:15.040 lock her up,

00:59:16.640 he was talking

00:59:19.280 about one

00:59:19.780 person, right?

00:59:22.620 One person

00:59:23.440 who we now

00:59:26.760 know was

00:59:27.540 behind the

00:59:28.200 Russia collusion

00:59:29.140 hoax.

00:59:30.460 Now, I

00:59:31.180 guess that's

00:59:32.660 not illegal.

00:59:34.560 I guess.

00:59:35.700 somebody who

00:59:37.020 was associated

00:59:37.620 with the

00:59:38.040 Clinton

00:59:38.580 Foundation or

00:59:39.700 whatever it

00:59:40.040 is, that

00:59:40.940 probably was

00:59:41.780 just an

00:59:42.120 influence-buying

00:59:42.920 thing, but

00:59:44.280 probably not

00:59:45.040 totally illegal.

00:59:47.320 So I think

00:59:48.200 in Trump's

00:59:48.720 case, he

00:59:50.460 was specific

00:59:51.460 to a person.

00:59:52.320 He wasn't

00:59:52.680 saying lock

00:59:53.220 up Democrats.

00:59:53.960 If Trump

00:59:55.740 ever, let me

00:59:57.160 say it really

00:59:58.260 clearly, if

01:00:00.180 Trump had

01:00:00.720 ever joked,

01:00:02.520 even in the

01:00:03.580 context of

01:00:04.220 monopoly, if

01:00:05.560 Trump had

01:00:05.940 ever joked

01:00:06.660 about locking

01:00:07.520 up Democrats

01:00:08.360 in general, or

01:00:10.240 like his

01:00:10.620 opponents in

01:00:11.340 general, I

01:00:13.120 wouldn't be

01:00:13.540 cool with

01:00:13.960 that, not

01:00:15.480 even a little

01:00:16.000 bit, would

01:00:16.960 you?

01:00:17.160 But if

01:00:18.600 he says

01:00:18.920 he's going

01:00:19.200 to lock

01:00:19.440 up Hillary, 0.76

01:00:21.200 you know, I

01:00:22.660 think he was

01:00:23.020 actually serious

01:00:23.700 about that.

01:00:25.160 And that

01:00:26.500 was for

01:00:26.860 specific things

01:00:28.060 that she

01:00:28.340 did.

01:00:28.600 It wasn't

01:00:28.900 because she's

01:00:29.600 a Democrat.

01:00:34.400 The audience

01:00:35.160 said lock

01:00:35.720 her up, but 0.97

01:00:36.160 he embraced

01:00:37.040 it.

01:00:41.520 All right.

01:00:44.040 Well, that,

01:00:44.800 ladies and 0.98

01:00:45.100 gentlemen,

01:00:46.200 concludes our

01:00:47.140 highly

01:00:47.960 entertaining,

01:00:48.960 best thing

01:00:49.520 that ever

01:00:49.860 happened to

01:00:50.260 you, live

01:00:51.140 stream for

01:00:51.740 today.

01:00:54.140 Let us

01:00:54.760 go forth

01:00:55.400 and build

01:00:58.640 back better

01:00:59.220 and make

01:00:59.840 America great

01:01:00.640 for the

01:01:02.860 first time

01:01:03.320 or again,

01:01:03.920 depending on

01:01:04.320 your point

01:01:04.600 of view.

01:01:06.480 And would

01:01:08.600 anybody like

01:01:09.040 closing

01:01:09.560 simultaneous

01:01:10.240 sip?

01:01:11.240 Yes, you

01:01:11.640 would, but

01:01:12.020 only if you're

01:01:12.580 ready, because

01:01:13.700 the simultaneous

01:01:14.320 sip that

01:01:14.900 closes this

01:01:15.520 live stream

01:01:16.100 waits for

01:01:16.900 no one.

01:01:17.980 Go.

01:01:26.160 And that,

01:01:26.840 ladies and 0.98

01:01:27.120 gentlemen, is

01:01:29.120 it for today.

01:01:30.260 And happy

01:01:30.640 birthday to

01:01:31.240 Johnny Depp.

01:01:32.440 Bye for

01:01:32.820 now.

01:01:32.980 next who came out

01:01:46.320 and

01:01:46.660 came out

01:01:47.260 again by

01:01:47.920 downhill and

01:01:48.200 flyはい

01:01:48.580 together.

01:01:48.880 Bye for

01:01:49.800 next.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 09, 2022

Episode 1769 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About The Kangaroo Court And Chuck Schumer's Impeachment

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript