Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1770 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About The January 6 Kangaroo Court. You Won't Want To Miss This

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to not only the highlight of civilization, but the best example of it.

00:00:10.580 Today's show will feature talk about the kangaroo court. I know that's why you're here. Yeah, it is. 0.89

00:00:17.780 And before we do that, would you like to take your attitude up a level?

00:00:24.080 Would you like your dopamine to go up a notch while your serotonin and oxytocin slowly simmer, waiting for just the right moment to jump in in just the right amount?

00:00:36.960 Yes, you would. And you'll find that every day you come here and hear that message, it's going to work a little bit better. Savor it.

00:00:44.960 Now, if you want to take it up a notch, all you need is a copper mug or a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, filling with your favorite beverage.

00:00:57.260 I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:06.020 It's called a simultaneous sip. It's going to happen now. Go.

00:01:14.960 I saw a suggestion in the comments that it should be called the simultaneous swallow, but I'm going to save that for the evening program, if you know what I mean.

00:01:31.100 Well, ladies and gentlemen, I have this weird optimistic feeling I wanted to share with you, because it seems like everything's falling apart, doesn't it?

00:01:41.920 The economy is melting and inflation's high and gas is too expensive and that Omicron never seems to go away and blah, blah, nuclear war, shortage of everything.

00:01:55.000 Where's my water? Forest fire is getting ready to spark up any moment now.

00:01:59.580 But, did you know that if we were a company instead of a country, and you could apply this to whatever country you're in, companies need to cannibalize themselves.

00:02:14.260 So companies need to put themselves on a business every few years in order to renew, because if they don't put themselves on a business, someone else will by making a better product. 0.92

00:02:26.060 So Apple, for example, needs to continually make a better product such that the last product they made looks like crap.

00:02:35.940 So they need to destroy themselves every few years. Apple does. 0.95

00:02:40.660 They just got rid of the iPod, right?

00:02:44.760 And countries may have to do the same thing.

00:02:50.920 They may have to do the same thing.

00:02:52.020 You've probably noticed that Germany and Japan did well with help, but recovering from World War II.

00:03:02.400 So burning everything down every now and then is part of the necessary moving forward process.

00:03:09.300 The part that's alarming is that the safest path for humanity looks like the least safe path.

00:03:17.240 Because we're naturally biased toward keeping things the same, don't rock the boat.

00:03:23.120 And for anything to change drastically, you've got to rock the boat.

00:03:28.040 So while it is really always the safest thing to do to cannibalize yourself,

00:03:33.840 to destroy what you have to try to build it back to a better way,

00:03:37.700 it's messy.

00:03:40.000 And while you're in it, it feels like everything's going wrong.

00:03:42.520 But I have this feeling that none of these things are going to kill us.

00:03:51.620 And that we're seeing the small micro-nuclear projects going forward.

00:03:58.080 We're seeing fusion coming online.

00:04:00.240 We're seeing big CO2 scrubbers.

00:04:02.500 We're seeing all kinds of innovation and everything from farming to space to who knows where we're going to find our next rare earth minerals.

00:04:15.360 Some people say, well, we'll just mine them from the ocean.

00:04:18.840 So almost all the things that look like these horrible problems are almost guaranteed

00:04:23.880 to create a renewed product or a set of products or new systems around those things that weren't working well before.

00:04:32.780 There's just a whole bunch of stuff that's going to get better.

00:04:36.300 And today, we're just going to have fun talking about the silliness

00:04:40.340 and thinking about all the things that are going to get better.

00:04:43.700 Even while it feels like it's not.

00:04:46.380 So that's the toughest situation in which to be optimistic when everything's on fire.

00:04:54.760 But everything that burns down gets built back better, to use a Bidenism.

00:05:02.040 Well, here's a story.

00:05:04.480 True story.

00:05:06.200 Somewhere in Pennsylvania on Thursday,

00:05:09.380 two people were rescued after falling into a tank full of chocolate at the Mars M&M factory.

00:05:16.380 In Pennsylvania.

00:05:18.640 So two people fell into a big tank of chocolate,

00:05:22.660 which was actually kind of dangerous.

00:05:25.660 It's not clear how the two people got in there,

00:05:28.460 but there are some preliminary reports about the two people who got into the M&M chocolate.

00:05:35.960 Preliminary reports are that they were both nuts.

00:05:42.500 Talk among yourselves. 0.99

00:05:43.760 It's fine.

00:05:44.960 Yeah.

00:05:45.900 Yeah.

00:05:47.180 I know.

00:05:47.640 Some of you thought it was the best thing you heard today.

00:05:50.200 Some of you are saying,

00:05:51.400 Oh, God, why am I listening to this?

00:05:53.660 I know.

00:05:54.120 It's a very individual thing.

00:05:56.460 But, yeah.

00:05:58.060 And the moral of the story is,

00:05:59.740 keep your nuts out of the chocolate.

00:06:03.420 Keep your nuts out of the chocolate.

00:06:04.820 That's the moral of the story.

00:06:06.740 Well, I have come up with a solution for solving the immigration crisis at the border. 0.93

00:06:15.560 Specifically, the large numbers of them.

00:06:16.700 Specifically, the large numbers of them.

00:06:18.580 I'm pro-immigrant.

00:06:19.900 I just think we should be able to control how it's done.

00:06:23.080 And right now, the Democrats seem to be less interested in controlling it.

00:06:28.260 And so it's hard to make a deal.

00:06:30.540 But I came up with a strategy that you will laugh at.

00:06:36.320 I'm going to make you two guarantees.

00:06:38.080 Two guarantees.

00:06:38.960 Number one, you'll laugh because you'll think it's a joke.

00:06:41.180 And then after you laugh, you'll realize that the reason you're laughing is because it would work.

00:06:48.260 So these are my promises.

00:06:50.020 I'm going to deliver this right now.

00:06:51.780 You're going to laugh.

00:06:53.880 And when I'm done, you're going to say, 0.98

00:06:56.840 Damn it, that would actually, in the real world, that would actually work. 0.98

00:07:00.620 Completely work. 0.99

00:07:02.320 It goes like this.

00:07:04.840 Give all of the immigrants in the caravans 1.00

00:07:07.620 free red hats.

00:07:13.000 Now, originally, I thought they should say MAGA on them, but that's too far.

00:07:17.320 Just put an American flag on them.

00:07:20.420 American flag and a red hat.

00:07:24.280 And they all have to have them before they come across the border.

00:07:28.120 Do you know why?

00:07:30.020 Number one, no one says no to a free hat.

00:07:35.080 No one says no to a free hat.

00:07:37.620 Because it's really hot.

00:07:39.480 And a lot of them don't have hats.

00:07:40.860 I was looking at them.

00:07:41.640 I was looking at the migrant care events.

00:07:44.020 Number two,

00:07:45.980 what do Republicans think when they see the migrants streaming across the border

00:07:50.840 and they're thinking,

00:07:52.640 My God, look at all these future Democrat voters.

00:07:56.540 They think they're losing their power.

00:07:59.880 Because maybe they are.

00:08:01.740 I don't know.

00:08:02.380 I don't think necessarily.

00:08:04.640 But maybe they are.

00:08:05.420 I can see why they'd worry about it.

00:08:07.620 But imagine if every time you saw a new video of a caravan streaming across the border,

00:08:13.020 they were all wearing hats that reminded you of Republicans.

00:08:16.840 This is the part where I just turned you.

00:08:22.180 You just realized, wait a minute.

00:08:25.320 They would take the free hats.

00:08:27.580 They would just have an American flag on it.

00:08:30.800 Wouldn't you like to see people streaming across the border wearing American flags?

00:08:36.400 Wouldn't you, first of all, wouldn't you feel differently?

00:08:41.880 Wouldn't you feel differently?

00:08:43.220 I know you're going to say, no, I wouldn't.

00:08:45.280 I would use my rational brain.

00:08:48.580 Yeah, I know it's genius.

00:08:49.700 It is genius.

00:08:51.540 I'm not done yet.

00:08:52.900 This is going to get better, by the way.

00:08:54.740 I'm just starting.

00:08:55.600 But it actually does get better.

00:08:59.740 So the first thing you do is you make the media argue whether a red hat with an American flag on it only means Republican.

00:09:09.380 Because it doesn't.

00:09:11.460 But the left has made it mean that to themselves.

00:09:15.680 So if it means that to themselves, well, that's sort of on them.

00:09:20.360 And it wouldn't cost them any money.

00:09:22.320 Here we assume that there's some Republican fund that funds these hats.

00:09:29.380 Number two.

00:09:32.060 Do you think it would influence the immigrants to be more pro-American?

00:09:37.760 Just because they got a free hat and they had a little flag on it.

00:09:42.980 Yes.

00:09:43.420 Yes, absolutely.

00:09:46.380 Yes, who would influence them?

00:09:48.040 Not only would they be influenced by the hat that they were wearing, but they would see their friends with the same hats.

00:09:54.080 They would absolutely find value in the hat.

00:09:58.440 They would feel an immediate sense of reciprocity.

00:10:04.880 If America gives you a hat, like it's a gift, you walk in the door illegally and they give you a gift. 0.62

00:10:12.580 What are you going to think of Republicans?

00:10:14.220 Because you would come to think it was Republicans, too.

00:10:17.320 So that's part of the genius of this.

00:10:19.980 What would you do if the very first thing that happened is you broke the laws in America, but they gave you a gift?

00:10:26.740 Well, well, you wouldn't know what to do.

00:10:32.200 But the little reciprocity gene just kicks in.

00:10:35.760 And you'd say, you know, I wasn't here.

00:10:38.460 I mean, I didn't even put a foot across the border.

00:10:41.480 And whoever hands out these red hats with flags on them, I like them because they took care of me because it was really hot.

00:10:47.740 And I'll tell you what I needed.

00:10:49.120 I needed more than anything.

00:10:50.920 I needed a hat.

00:10:51.980 If you look at how poor they appear to be, it looks like they can't afford hats, a lot of them.

00:10:59.540 Because I don't know why you wouldn't wear one in the summer.

00:11:01.580 So now you've got the hats.

00:11:06.200 Are you ready for a phase two?

00:11:08.860 Come up with a Republican app, the sort of branded Republican, maybe even with the red colors and the American flag still.

00:11:19.580 So make it look like it's an American thing, but sort of obviously Republican.

00:11:24.460 And you make it available to the immigrants.

00:11:26.420 And let's say the app helped them find jobs at Republican-owned farms and businesses.

00:11:40.960 Because it's not as if we don't need the labor.

00:11:43.260 We need the labor. 1.00

00:11:44.900 But suppose Republicans said, look, if we can't stop the immigration, at least can we get you in this app?

00:11:51.380 We'll get your name.

00:11:52.820 Maybe you'll take a picture of you.

00:11:54.920 So at least we'll be able to track you a little bit.

00:11:58.500 And if you wear our hat and you use our app, we'll make sure you get paid.

00:12:04.180 How about that?

00:12:06.400 How about if you use the app, we'll make sure that your employer has to use the app to pay you.

00:12:13.440 And then you're definitely going to get paid.

00:12:15.660 Because you'll put your hours into the app and it'll be able to track if you showed up for time, showed up to work.

00:12:22.120 So you can imagine a set of features that the app would have that would simply be useful.

00:12:29.140 It wouldn't matter if you were a legal or an illegal alien.

00:12:33.740 Let's say immigrant. 0.51

00:12:34.740 It would just be useful.

00:12:37.800 And then suddenly, what would the Democrats say about a situation in which the Republicans are still advocating for total border security?

00:12:48.840 So you don't have to change that.

00:12:50.700 So Republicans can still want their wall.

00:12:52.720 And I advocate for total control of a border, but I don't advocate for turning off immigration.

00:13:00.460 We should just do it rationally.

00:13:02.920 And so what if the Democrats said to themselves, wait a minute, I just saw that poll that said a lot of, I don't know if it's first or second generation immigrants from Mexico and Latin America,

00:13:16.660 that a lot of them are more Republican?

00:13:20.400 So imagine if you saw them, the Republicans appear to be courting their vote before they even stepped over the border.

00:13:30.080 Imagine if the Republicans played to wimp and just said, look, we're going to win one of two ways.

00:13:38.100 We're either going to close the border.

00:13:40.680 Maybe that's first choice.

00:13:41.800 But if you're not going to close it, we're going to turn them into Republicans.

00:13:46.720 You only have two choices.

00:13:49.700 It's either a controlled border or lots more Republicans.

00:13:52.860 Pick one.

00:13:53.760 You don't think the Republicans could turn them into Republican voters if they really put the effort into it?

00:14:00.140 Absolutely they could.

00:14:01.440 But here's the thing.

00:14:02.640 It wouldn't have to work.

00:14:05.140 It would only have to look like it might.

00:14:08.560 It would just have to look like it might.

00:14:10.440 And if the Republicans talked about it and said, look, it's not our first choice,

00:14:16.420 but we're sure as hell not going to let them come to this country and not have American values.

00:14:22.060 So let's call those separate questions.

00:14:25.200 Number one, do you come?

00:14:27.480 Who gets to come and when?

00:14:28.900 Number two, if you're going to be here, do we manage that situation well or do we just let it handle itself?

00:14:36.760 So the idea is amazingly provocative but completely practical.

00:14:46.560 Like every part of what I just described is doable and legal and I don't think there's anything that would stop you from doing any of it.

00:14:54.980 It's just money and it would be money well spent if you were of that political persuasion.

00:14:59.380 All right, Rasmussen reports that that gap when they do the generic Republican against the generic Democrat for the midterms,

00:15:11.340 the lead is up to nine points for the generic Republican.

00:15:16.180 So that's up from eight.

00:15:19.520 So I think it's the highest gap, correct me if I'm wrong, at least within Rasmussen, at least lately.

00:15:27.840 I think it's one of the biggest gaps we've seen in enthusiasm or likely outcome.

00:15:35.080 But remember, there are no generic Republicans and there are no generic Democrats.

00:15:43.140 So it doesn't really mean exactly that all the Republicans win, but we'll see.

00:15:51.660 Amazingly, Twitter has decided to give Elon Musk all the data he wants.

00:15:58.160 It's been described by some as a firehose of data.

00:16:00.820 Now, it could be a trick. It could be a trick.

00:16:04.580 They could be giving him so much data that it can't be analyzed because it's just not in the form that anybody can use it,

00:16:12.200 that it can't be analyzed before the deal needs to close or if there's some kind of deadline involved.

00:16:18.080 I don't know if there is.

00:16:19.260 But it could be a trick.

00:16:20.680 They could be just burying him in data, which would be as good as giving him nothing.

00:16:24.840 So let's wait for the next level of information about what this really, really means.

00:16:31.600 Because the next thing you should hear is Elon Musk either saying,

00:16:36.340 this data is useful and it's exactly what I wanted,

00:16:39.080 or he'll say, what are you trying to pull?

00:16:43.180 This data is useless and it doesn't tell me what I need to know or there's something missing or something like that.

00:16:48.480 Which way do you think it's going to go?

00:16:49.760 Do you think Elon Musk is going to take that data and say, exactly what I asked for?

00:16:55.540 Thank you.

00:16:56.580 And now I have my answers.

00:16:59.480 Have you ever worked for a big company?

00:17:02.760 Everybody who's ever worked for a big company knows this is a trick.

00:17:07.440 Of course it's a trick.

00:17:09.200 Now, we don't know how much of a trick, but it's a trick.

00:17:12.660 All right.

00:17:13.780 There's no such thing as a big corporation that just says, you know what?

00:17:17.860 Hey, let's just completely change our stance from it's impossible to give you for 10 different reasons.

00:17:25.880 Completely change that and we'll just give you all the data.

00:17:30.420 That doesn't happen in the real world.

00:17:32.820 And it didn't happen here.

00:17:35.240 But the news might report it that way.

00:17:38.040 There's some kind of trick.

00:17:39.460 It's either too much data, the wrong data, or it's 99% of the data, but without the 1% that really would be the dangerous part.

00:17:50.060 It could be that the data has already been massaged.

00:17:54.060 It could be anything.

00:17:55.100 It could be that they're selectively picking time periods for when they looked at the data.

00:18:01.560 Perhaps it's the data only since after they scrubbed out the bots.

00:18:05.920 You know, you could think of 50 different ways a corporation could manage this situation, if you know what I mean.

00:18:13.740 Manage the situation.

00:18:15.920 Massage the situation.

00:18:17.700 And I say this as somebody who worked for big corporations, massaging data.

00:18:23.360 This was literally my job, you know, to make stuff persuasive.

00:18:28.300 So, and that meant a little bit of interpretation and assumption going on there.

00:18:35.220 All right.

00:18:35.760 Well, keep an eye on that space.

00:18:39.920 Let's talk about January 6th and the hearings.

00:18:42.000 How many of you watched it?

00:18:43.800 It was tough to watch all of it.

00:18:45.260 I tried to catch as much of it and plus the arguments as I could.

00:18:48.200 So, the first thing you care about is that Fox News just had Tucker Carlson show instead.

00:18:55.380 And Tucker went at it hard.

00:18:56.920 He said that he wouldn't carry the propaganda and he wouldn't help them because they're lying.

00:19:03.380 So, I like the fact that he just says it directly.

00:19:06.320 It's propaganda.

00:19:07.380 I'm not going to help them.

00:19:08.820 They're lying.

00:19:11.340 Pretty good.

00:19:12.000 Now, here are some of the lies.

00:19:19.280 CBS apparently said the protesters caused the death of five police officers because of the January 6th protests.

00:19:27.180 The reality is there were five police officers who died after the event of suicide.

00:19:34.840 But there's no definitive connection that January 6th caused that

00:19:40.200 because there's a high rate of suicide among that population.

00:19:43.940 So, that was just, you know, one of the examples of the, I would call that a lie.

00:19:49.360 I mean, it's important.

00:19:51.560 I think it's definitely worth noting.

00:19:53.640 But you have to put it in context.

00:19:55.300 Otherwise, it's a lie.

00:19:58.120 Now, here's the thing that I wasn't quite sure of.

00:20:02.320 Like, I thought this was going to be the case a little bit.

00:20:05.340 Then I thought, well, no, that's impossible.

00:20:06.800 They're actually having the hearings and just showing one side of the argument?

00:20:13.160 I thought I was hallucinating.

00:20:16.240 I thought, well, wait.

00:20:18.940 Why would you even call this a hearing?

00:20:21.280 Like, what does a hearing mean?

00:20:23.920 And since when in the United States does anybody think a fair system is one side telling their story?

00:20:31.380 Is there even one person in anywhere, even one person, this is an actual challenge.

00:20:39.740 Find me one citizen of the United States, legal or illegal,

00:20:44.560 who thinks that a good system involves hearing one side tell their story.

00:20:50.320 Literally nobody.

00:20:52.300 There's not one person in the whole world who thinks that that makes any sense.

00:20:58.100 And yet they're doing it right in front of us.

00:20:59.660 Now, what I love about their strategy from a persuasion perspective,

00:21:03.920 if I'm going to give them a persuasion grade, it's going to be good.

00:21:08.060 So don't let that annoy you.

00:21:10.780 Because what they're doing is completely unethical, un-American, unscrupulous, 1.00

00:21:16.080 as horrible as the violence at January 6th.

00:21:20.600 Yeah, I just said it.

00:21:21.740 I just said it.

00:21:22.280 But what the Democrats are doing right now to the country is on a par with the thing they're talking about.

00:21:31.800 The violence, which did look pretty bad.

00:21:34.680 The videos are quite persuasive that there was a super, super dangerous situation with real injuries.

00:21:42.480 And you do really feel it.

00:21:46.400 So persuasion-wise, they did a great job, because they make you feel it.

00:21:49.120 They put you right in the scene.

00:21:50.760 And you hear the anguished calls from the law enforcement people,

00:21:56.080 you know, that they're basically outnumbered and getting pushed around and everything.

00:21:59.500 And the genius of which they, of course, selectively, selectively, you know, put the audio over the video.

00:22:10.700 Because don't you think there were some law enforcement people who weren't talking like they were about to be killed at any moment?

00:22:18.200 There had to also be video or audio of law enforcement saying,

00:22:23.360 we will need reinforcements over the East Gate.

00:22:26.100 Looks like we're holding them, but better get over here pretty quickly.

00:22:30.500 Was there anybody who talked like that?

00:22:32.820 Or did they all talk like, they're coming through the gate.

00:22:36.380 There's so many of them.

00:22:37.840 We don't know what to do.

00:22:38.580 And I'm not mocking them, by the way.

00:22:40.200 I want to make clear that that was not intended to be mocking the audio of the people who were literally risking their life

00:22:48.220 to protect the Capitol and the government.

00:22:51.320 So they were heroes.

00:22:53.700 No ambiguity about that.

00:22:55.680 The defenders were heroes.

00:22:57.020 But the audio that were chosen was chosen to make you feel a certain way, to make you feel afraid, put you in the seat.

00:23:06.460 So persuasion-wise, it was really good.

00:23:08.880 Now, if you were just going to dip into this like most consumers would,

00:23:12.540 that people like me, some of you, are going to sort of dig in and see what's going on, because we like it.

00:23:19.860 It's just a hobby.

00:23:21.320 But the casual public is going to turn this on, and they will be under the mistaken impression

00:23:27.140 that it's some kind of a balanced discussion, or you see both sides, or, you know, somebody gets to interview people,

00:23:35.420 and then there's, you know, counter-interviews.

00:23:38.240 You would just assume that the other side was being shown, wouldn't you?

00:23:42.300 It was not.

00:23:43.920 Do you know why this is in the form of a documentary?

00:23:47.500 Because really, they put together like a show.

00:23:49.820 It's like a documentary.

00:23:51.860 Because a documentary is persuasive, because it doesn't try to necessarily, depends on the documentary,

00:23:59.380 but it doesn't necessarily try to show both sides.

00:24:02.260 And I don't think there's any effort.

00:24:04.960 I mean, nobody's even trying to do it.

00:24:07.160 So why do you have to do a documentary as your form of presentation?

00:24:12.180 You use the documentary form when the facts don't make the case.

00:24:18.200 Where would this be if the facts made the case?

00:24:24.380 Wouldn't there be some kind of legal court case involved?

00:24:30.640 All right, here's my first aha moment.

00:24:34.780 What do the Democrats say about claims of election irregularity?

00:24:43.120 They say, no court has found.

00:24:47.660 No court has found anybody guilty of that.

00:24:51.440 So why do the Democrats need to use a documentary hearing that shows only one side?

00:24:59.020 Why do they need to do that? 0.99

00:25:00.340 Because there's no court that found whatever it is that they're alleging to be illegal,

00:25:08.620 except for the specific cases, of which there are quite a number of them,

00:25:12.380 of specific people who did illegal things, which I don't minimize.

00:25:16.720 So just later, when somebody takes this out in context,

00:25:20.040 let me put in here my statement that I think everybody should say,

00:25:25.020 that I don't minimize the violence.

00:25:27.460 That was a pretty bad-looking situation, I've got to say, the violent parts.

00:25:34.460 But also, that was, you know, a small percentage of the people who were there.

00:25:40.580 I think the people who were behind the people who were doing the violence

00:25:44.280 were just sort of going along for the ride.

00:25:47.480 Maybe unwisely, but it's a whole different level of badness.

00:25:51.920 All right, so amazingly, Democrats have responded to this thing that they're calling an insurrection

00:26:02.040 by creating a propaganda vehicle to demonize part of the country

00:26:08.660 without giving that part of the country due process and the right of rebuttal.

00:26:16.240 What would be, hypothetically, and I'm not recommending this,

00:26:22.040 I want to be really clear, I'm not recommending this, but just as a mental experiment,

00:26:26.720 what would be a process that the public would use

00:26:29.760 to fix a problem of its government going into bold propaganda mode

00:26:37.820 and accusing people without letting them defend themselves?

00:26:44.520 What would be voting?

00:26:47.420 Voting would be one, yeah.

00:26:49.360 The other would be an insurrection.

00:26:52.020 So the Democrats have decided to respond to what they call an insurrection, but wasn't.

00:26:59.520 And we know that because people who plan insurrections, they generally have their weapons out.

00:27:07.120 That's like, you know, insurrection 101.

00:27:10.440 But that wasn't the case with these protesters.

00:27:14.120 So whatever it was they were planning to do, it wasn't taking and holding the country, that's for sure.

00:27:20.020 So if you were to blame half the country for causing an insurrection, and it's a fake accusation, 0.98

00:27:24.940 and you make the accusation in public, and you damn these people, and you compare them to white supremacists, 0.98

00:27:31.160 and you try to get the country so angry at them 0.99

00:27:35.960 that one of them might get a loaded weapon and drive across the country 0.98

00:27:39.600 and try to kill a Supreme Court justice, 0.99

00:27:43.080 if you were so despicable that you would do any of these things, 0.99

00:27:48.740 I can think of one solution, an insurrection.

00:27:52.640 I don't recommend it.

00:27:55.960 But you have to be conscious of the fact that they're creating the situation that invites an insurrection,

00:28:04.560 which is demonizing one part of the public unfairly

00:28:09.420 and not letting that side of the public present their side of the case.

00:28:16.580 That is the most un-American thing you could do.

00:28:19.100 And that is the reason that revolutions are fought.

00:28:24.080 Revolutions happen because the government is abusing you and not letting you have your say.

00:28:28.760 This is the government abusing part of the public right in front of us

00:28:32.620 and not letting them have their say. 1.00

00:28:37.700 This is worthy of a fucking insurrection. 0.99

00:28:41.980 I don't recommend it. 0.99

00:28:43.280 It wouldn't be useful.

00:28:45.100 But it's worthy.

00:28:47.660 It's worthy of it.

00:28:48.980 From an ethical, moral standpoint,

00:28:53.440 these are people who should be thrown out of government

00:28:56.300 and the whole system should be torn down

00:28:58.260 and it should be replaced.

00:29:01.140 Wouldn't be a good idea.

00:29:03.060 Don't do it.

00:29:04.600 Right?

00:29:05.480 Because it's just not the kind of destruction we need at the moment.

00:29:08.580 But morally, ethically, yeah, they've made the case for insurrection.

00:29:14.300 They have made the case for insurrection.

00:29:17.280 And that's what they accomplished so far.

00:29:20.000 Have we ever had a less competent government?

00:29:24.260 Literally no.

00:29:25.880 Literally no.

00:29:27.080 We've never had a less competent government.

00:29:28.940 They've actually created a public case for insurrection 0.98

00:29:34.400 by removing the most basic protection that every fucking American has, 0.98

00:29:39.640 which is the right to face your accuser and address the allegations. 0.99

00:29:45.720 The most basic fucking right. 0.98

00:29:49.320 Most basic. 0.99

00:29:51.160 You know, after free speech maybe,

00:29:53.080 which is also under assault.

00:29:55.060 Yeah, Joel Pollack was pointing this out in the tweet

00:30:00.080 that they're basically responding in an un-American way

00:30:05.800 and they're doing it right in front of us,

00:30:07.840 which is the weird thing.

00:30:10.180 How can you be so un-American? 1.00

00:30:13.260 Like, right in front of America. 1.00

00:30:15.220 It's one thing if, like, there's one idiot who says something 1.00

00:30:18.220 and you say, ah, that sounded a little un-American. 1.00

00:30:20.780 I mean, that's just people talking.

00:30:21.940 But this is an organized, un-American effort 0.68

00:30:26.000 to be as un-American as you could possibly be. 0.83

00:30:30.740 All right.

00:30:32.120 Here's what Brian Stelter said about Tucker Carlson.

00:30:38.000 And I swear,

00:30:39.960 if I didn't tell you that this is real,

00:30:43.040 you would think this was a joke.

00:30:45.560 This is really CNN's Brian Stelter

00:30:48.200 who really wrote this about Tucker Carlson.

00:30:52.540 And, you know, Tucker not covering the January 6th stuff.

00:30:57.080 And so Stelter says,

00:30:58.380 Carlson sounded like an amateur magician

00:31:01.080 who tries to distract kids when a performance falls apart.

00:31:05.320 Look over here, not over there, he said.

00:31:08.700 Gas is over five bucks.

00:31:10.540 Inflation is higher than it's been in a lifetime of most Americans.

00:31:13.700 Violent crime is making cities impossible to live in.

00:31:16.180 And more than 100,000 Americans OD'd on drugs last year.

00:31:19.860 Why isn't there a primetime hearing about any of that?

00:31:26.240 Wait.

00:31:27.780 What?

00:31:29.160 Did Brian Stelter literally just say

00:31:32.080 that Tucker was trying to distract the country 0.99

00:31:35.580 from a bullshit propaganda documentary 0.99

00:31:39.640 that only shows one side 0.99

00:31:41.360 and is intended to mislead us?

00:31:43.620 It's designed to mislead us.

00:31:46.180 By design, right in front of us.

00:31:49.080 They're not even hiding the fact that

00:31:50.720 by design, it's meant to deceive you.

00:31:54.780 Because everybody knows that

00:31:56.420 if you only show one side of the argument,

00:31:58.180 it's meant to deceive.

00:31:59.880 Children know that.

00:32:01.820 Everybody knows that.

00:32:04.220 So Stelter says that

00:32:05.600 instead of looking at the thing

00:32:06.740 that is clearly meant to deceive you

00:32:08.540 for pure, you know, political reasons, 1.00

00:32:11.260 that Tucker Carlson, that bastard, 0.99

00:32:15.660 that bastard is trying to make you look at your current biggest problems. 1.00

00:32:21.740 That is despicable. 1.00

00:32:24.300 Tucker Carlson is trying to get you to focus on

00:32:26.840 your own personal biggest problems

00:32:29.060 and the country's biggest problems,

00:32:31.180 which are yours as well, inflation, etc.

00:32:33.100 And he's distracting you from the thing

00:32:36.040 that has no purpose whatsoever

00:32:37.520 except to be bad

00:32:41.060 for Tucker Carlson's audience.

00:32:45.840 This doesn't even sound serious, does it?

00:32:48.040 Have I become so hypnotized myself

00:32:53.260 that this does make sense to other people

00:32:56.140 and it's just that when I see it,

00:32:58.040 my brain can't make sense of it?

00:33:00.340 Or does it really not make sense to anybody 0.81

00:33:03.200 that the ridiculous thing,

00:33:07.360 that we're being distracted by our actual problems 0.97

00:33:10.400 instead of looking at the ridiculous thing? 0.96

00:33:13.500 It's pretty bold. 0.98

00:33:14.860 It's bold.

00:33:15.400 You know what we should do with Brian Stelter?

00:33:22.120 If there's anybody who should fall into a giant tank of chocolate,

00:33:26.640 well, there is one nut.

00:33:29.040 No, that sounds violent.

00:33:31.180 Do not do anything bad to Brian Stelter,

00:33:33.760 who I kind of like, by the way.

00:33:38.000 One of the strange things about Brian Stelter

00:33:40.680 is that as much as he is mockable in many ways,

00:33:46.520 he's also really likable.

00:33:48.720 Like, he looks like if you knew him personally,

00:33:50.920 he'd be fun to be with.

00:33:54.220 Anyway.

00:33:56.840 So if you have not watched the January 6th hearings,

00:33:59.400 I want to explain the logic.

00:34:01.680 Because they took a lot of variables

00:34:04.100 and they put them together.

00:34:05.400 So I'm going to run through the argument,

00:34:08.360 and let's see if you can follow it.

00:34:12.020 All right?

00:34:12.720 Now I'm going to summarize it into its simplest form,

00:34:16.040 but see if you can follow along.

00:34:17.880 Because there's going to be a bunch of different pieces

00:34:19.420 that come together,

00:34:20.940 like, dare I say, a masterpiece.

00:34:23.760 I mean, they'll start just by parts,

00:34:27.120 but eventually it'll become like a delicious gourmet soup.

00:34:32.060 But you have to wait for the end.

00:34:34.860 All right, here's what the Democrats are telling us.

00:34:37.480 Number one, there were some white supremacists,

00:34:40.300 allegedly, who were members of the Proud Boys.

00:34:43.040 And the Proud Boys being a group

00:34:44.660 whose leader is a person of color.

00:34:47.280 So that's assumption number one. 0.98

00:34:49.180 There are white supremacists 0.91

00:34:50.340 in this organization that's led by a person of color. 0.95

00:34:55.800 Enrico. Enrique? Somebody?

00:34:59.380 The Proud Boys have had at least one conversation

00:35:02.520 with a different group called the Oath Keepers.

00:35:05.940 We don't know what they talked about,

00:35:08.560 but they've talked.

00:35:10.360 They've met each other. They've talked.

00:35:14.220 Trump encouraged legal protests

00:35:16.340 against certifying the vote

00:35:18.100 before there was an audit.

00:35:20.340 Because he wanted to make sure the vote was accurate.

00:35:23.400 So Trump encouraged legal protests,

00:35:25.520 and we see the evidence of it

00:35:27.300 in his words, etc.

00:35:29.780 Then number four,

00:35:30.780 members of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers

00:35:32.600 were allegedly the violent ones

00:35:34.440 at the protests.

00:35:35.360 So they showed video

00:35:36.220 showing those two groups,

00:35:38.200 and they seemed to be sort of the vanguard

00:35:40.040 of the fights with the law enforcement.

00:35:47.700 And they're the ones

00:35:48.900 who fought and injured law enforcement.

00:35:51.340 Number five, Trump once said of the Proud Boys,

00:35:54.280 when asked about them,

00:35:55.600 that they should stand down and stand by.

00:35:57.620 I think, was that the exact quote?

00:35:59.300 Stand down and stand by.

00:36:01.080 And then the fake news told you

00:36:02.640 that what that means is

00:36:05.040 they should be ready for violence on his behalf.

00:36:09.300 That stand down and stand by

00:36:10.780 should be interpreted not as

00:36:12.260 don't do anything,

00:36:13.840 but rather as get ready to do something.

00:36:18.300 Because if you didn't know it,

00:36:19.520 and we learned this during Trump's term,

00:36:24.120 and I didn't know this.

00:36:25.700 I thought when he talked,

00:36:26.840 he was saying,

00:36:27.480 like, actual words

00:36:29.600 meant the same as normal words.

00:36:31.520 But apparently Trump has this thing

00:36:33.580 that they call, like,

00:36:34.400 a Mafia Don talk.

00:36:37.960 Where if somebody says,

00:36:40.260 let's say if a normal person say,

00:36:42.120 hey, you know,

00:36:43.940 if I'm away for the weekend,

00:36:45.160 could you take care of the cat?

00:36:47.300 That would be how a normal person talks.

00:36:49.620 And then you say,

00:36:50.420 oh, take care of the cat. 0.98

00:36:51.520 That would be feed the cat,

00:36:53.540 change the litter box,

00:36:54.840 make sure it doesn't get out.

00:36:56.400 Got it.

00:36:57.060 Take care of the cat.

00:36:57.980 But if Trump were to say,

00:37:00.740 take care of the cat,

00:37:02.180 then that's a Mafia leader talk.

00:37:07.220 And the way you should interpret that is,

00:37:09.820 when I'm gone,

00:37:11.820 take care of the cat.

00:37:13.940 Which would be interpreted as, 0.99

00:37:15.660 kill the cat. 0.99

00:37:17.220 So, 0.99

00:37:17.840 if you didn't know that Trump does opposite talk,

00:37:22.140 where when he says,

00:37:23.640 you know,

00:37:23.960 be peaceful and love,

00:37:26.540 that what he really means is,

00:37:27.740 get ready for,

00:37:28.660 you know, 0.59

00:37:28.900 evil and killing and fighting.

00:37:31.340 Because it's opposite talk.

00:37:33.360 Now,

00:37:34.620 how do we know this?

00:37:37.760 I don't want to get into the whole background

00:37:39.540 of how originally we found that

00:37:41.440 Trump is a backwards talker. 0.65

00:37:43.620 Like a mafia don. 0.98

00:37:45.780 But,

00:37:46.380 if you look,

00:37:47.320 you can do your own research.

00:37:48.560 It has to do with the Rosetta Stone.

00:37:51.440 If you take it back to the Rosetta Stone,

00:37:54.600 blada, blada, blada, blada, 0.63

00:37:55.940 Trump's a backward stalker. 0.97

00:37:58.480 Stand down and stand by 0.98

00:38:00.320 means grab your weapons

00:38:02.540 and run into the fight.

00:38:05.260 So,

00:38:05.860 that's the argument.

00:38:08.700 And,

00:38:10.220 let's see,

00:38:11.480 there's some more stuff here.

00:38:13.860 Trump's advisors

00:38:14.840 did not think the election was rigged.

00:38:17.060 So,

00:38:18.540 Ivanka,

00:38:20.900 Bill Barr,

00:38:21.400 they did not think the election was rigged.

00:38:25.320 And,

00:38:25.860 therefore,

00:38:26.980 that should tell you something about what Trump thinks.

00:38:30.500 Because,

00:38:31.340 what people who are not Trump thinks

00:38:34.760 gives you an insight into what Trump thinks.

00:38:38.640 You see the connection there,

00:38:40.780 right?

00:38:42.100 People who are different people,

00:38:44.700 if they have thoughts in their head,

00:38:47.020 but you don't know anything about what's in Trump's head,

00:38:50.800 you can look at the thoughts that are in the other people's heads,

00:38:54.760 who are completely different personalities,

00:38:57.180 with different incentives.

00:38:59.340 And,

00:38:59.600 whatever they're thinking,

00:39:01.360 logically,

00:39:02.600 logically,

00:39:03.320 because of science,

00:39:04.820 is what Trump is also thinking.

00:39:06.300 So,

00:39:08.560 that's part of the argument.

00:39:12.200 Trump did not try to stop the violent protests.

00:39:15.720 Now,

00:39:16.040 I haven't heard him say why,

00:39:17.960 or what the counter-argument is.

00:39:20.360 But,

00:39:20.700 even,

00:39:21.340 I would say that,

00:39:22.520 that sounds like a reasonable,

00:39:24.980 a reasonable criticism.

00:39:27.300 Because,

00:39:27.860 I think there was even,

00:39:28.900 you know,

00:39:29.240 evidence that Don Jr.

00:39:30.760 and others had asked him to at least disavow the protests.

00:39:34.320 So,

00:39:34.540 I don't know what he did or didn't,

00:39:35.560 but their argument is that he didn't try to stop it for hours.

00:39:40.440 All right,

00:39:40.960 so you put it all together,

00:39:42.720 and all of this,

00:39:43.780 collectively,

00:39:47.400 collectively,

00:39:48.280 not any one thing,

00:39:49.460 but collectively,

00:39:50.320 when you see it all together,

00:39:51.840 these individual ingredients,

00:39:53.320 they create this delicious gourmet soup,

00:39:56.760 which says the following,

00:39:57.940 that Trump instigated an organized insurrection against the government.

00:40:04.820 Well,

00:40:05.340 there's no evidence that supports that claim.

00:40:07.620 But,

00:40:08.100 you have to look at it in its totality.

00:40:10.940 So,

00:40:11.440 while there's not any piece of evidence,

00:40:14.600 to suggest that he did that,

00:40:16.340 none,

00:40:16.600 if you put all the stuff that is not any evidence that it happened together,

00:40:22.380 and you look at it as a whole,

00:40:24.780 then suddenly you can see it.

00:40:26.440 So,

00:40:26.860 it's the same process of making soup.

00:40:29.180 If you had no ingredients for your soup,

00:40:31.960 this is like a Democrat soup.

00:40:34.460 So,

00:40:34.680 a Democrat soup would be like,

00:40:36.720 let's say it calls for some carrots,

00:40:41.180 but you don't have any carrots.

00:40:43.260 That doesn't matter.

00:40:44.920 And it also calls for some,

00:40:47.100 you know,

00:40:47.720 some meat and some broth,

00:40:49.260 but you don't have any meat,

00:40:50.200 and you don't have any broth.

00:40:51.500 It doesn't matter.

00:40:52.680 It's a Democrat soup.

00:40:54.280 And then it calls for,

00:40:55.360 like,

00:40:55.580 some potatoes,

00:40:56.220 but you don't have any potatoes either.

00:40:57.720 And when you're done,

00:40:58.440 you didn't actually have any of the ingredients,

00:41:00.600 but that doesn't matter.

00:41:02.340 Because it's not about any of the ingredients,

00:41:03.580 it's about how delicious the soup is

00:41:07.960 when you put together all the ingredients you don't have.

00:41:12.480 And that is what I call the Hannity argument.

00:41:17.700 Just to make your brain spin a little bit.

00:41:20.480 I call this the Hannity argument

00:41:21.980 because I've never seen anybody do it better.

00:41:25.720 And the technique goes like this.

00:41:27.440 It's a persuasion technique.

00:41:29.820 That you list several things that are true,

00:41:31.920 and then one thing that is not supported by the facts,

00:41:36.880 and the brain takes them all in as if,

00:41:39.520 well,

00:41:40.440 if the other things he said are true,

00:41:43.740 probably that other thing that I don't quite understand

00:41:46.540 is true as well.

00:41:47.840 So you take in the whole thing

00:41:51.020 because it's couched in other stuff that's true.

00:41:53.000 Now, I'll give you an example.

00:41:55.140 Now, this is not a real example,

00:41:56.740 but it's an example of the technique.

00:42:00.020 If I were to try to use this technique,

00:42:02.200 I might say,

00:42:03.340 potatoes are food.

00:42:04.380 All humans eventually die.

00:42:05.740 Crops require water.

00:42:06.860 Some farmers have drought problems.

00:42:08.320 Trump eats potatoes and drinks water. 0.99

00:42:09.840 Therefore, Trump wants you to die. 0.98

00:42:13.080 Now, Hannity has never said that, right?

00:42:14.840 So it's not a real example.

00:42:16.020 But it's an example of the five true things

00:42:19.960 and then toss one thing in there and change the subject.

00:42:23.220 All right, I'm going to read it again

00:42:24.340 because once you recognize the technique,

00:42:28.680 you'll see it all the time.

00:42:30.200 You know, Hannity's not like the one person who does it, right?

00:42:32.700 It's an opinion person thing.

00:42:35.040 So anybody else who does opinion work,

00:42:37.900 you're going to see this.

00:42:39.800 All right, I'll say it again.

00:42:40.800 And it's the speed you say it that makes it work.

00:42:43.400 All right, we all know potatoes are food.

00:42:45.420 All humans eventually die.

00:42:46.960 Crops, they require water.

00:42:48.700 Some farmers have drought problems.

00:42:50.680 Trump eats potatoes.

00:42:51.600 He drinks water. 0.99

00:42:52.580 Therefore, Trump wants you to die. 1.00

00:42:54.460 Next story. 0.92

00:42:58.120 Here's how Axios described this argument technique.

00:43:03.360 All right, so I'm describing it as Hannity persuasion.

00:43:07.580 Axios, which is, Axios is trying to make a name.

00:43:11.480 Correct me if I'm wrong in this.

00:43:12.900 I think this is true.

00:43:14.320 Axios was trying to make a name as a news organization

00:43:17.100 that was not obviously left or right biased.

00:43:21.320 Is that true?

00:43:23.760 And have they succeeded in that?

00:43:26.260 Because I feel like they have, actually.

00:43:29.080 Yeah, I do.

00:43:29.900 Axios is on my list of sources to try.

00:43:33.720 Now, I feel as though they've had stories

00:43:36.260 that maybe the right didn't like

00:43:37.680 and probably have stories that the left didn't like.

00:43:39.560 But I feel like they're making an honest attempt

00:43:43.600 to not be biased.

00:43:47.680 Okay, some of you are agreeing.

00:43:49.040 So, and I would say that in my casual, you know,

00:43:53.260 perusal, it looks like they succeed.

00:43:56.580 But I, you know, I can't tell.

00:43:58.280 It looks like it.

00:43:58.980 But here's how Axios talks about the Democrats' argument.

00:44:06.000 They called it indirect connective tissue

00:44:08.340 to establish, you know, Trump's culpability in this.

00:44:12.600 Indirect connective tissue.

00:44:15.820 Would you like to hear an example

00:44:17.220 of an argument that uses indirect connective tissue?

00:44:21.760 All right, here it goes.

00:44:24.380 Here's an argument with indirect connective tissue.

00:44:28.640 Potatoes are food.

00:44:29.460 All humans eventually die.

00:44:30.520 Crops require water.

00:44:31.440 Some farmers have drought problems.

00:44:32.600 Trump eats potatoes and drinks water. 0.99

00:44:33.980 Therefore, Trump wants you to die. 0.99

00:44:37.900 That, ladies and gentlemen, 0.99

00:44:39.680 is indirect connective tissue.

00:44:43.140 And scene.

00:44:48.520 Liz Cheney says

00:44:49.760 says former President Trump had a, quote,

00:44:52.700 sophisticated seven-point plan

00:44:55.120 to overturn the 2020 presidential election

00:44:58.240 over the course of several months.

00:45:00.980 I'm thinking to myself,

00:45:02.840 have you ever met,

00:45:07.540 have you ever heard of President Trump?

00:45:10.760 Let me tell you one thing he didn't have.

00:45:14.520 All right?

00:45:15.200 There are many things he has,

00:45:16.880 many things I don't know about,

00:45:18.200 many things he might have,

00:45:19.940 private thoughts I don't know about.

00:45:23.200 Might have investments I don't know about.

00:45:25.060 There might be all kinds of things

00:45:26.520 I don't know about Trump.

00:45:29.600 Lots and lots of things I don't know about him,

00:45:31.700 probably.

00:45:32.620 Wouldn't you assume.

00:45:34.100 But here's one thing I do know about him.

00:45:37.200 And I feel confident in saying this.

00:45:40.700 He has never had a sophisticated seven-point plan.

00:45:43.460 I just feel good about that.

00:45:49.720 I feel good in saying,

00:45:52.060 with some confidence,

00:45:53.780 he's never had a sophisticated seven-point plan.

00:45:57.600 Do you know why?

00:45:59.720 Let me tell you why. 1.00

00:46:01.460 Because he's not a fucking idiot. 1.00

00:46:04.420 Do you know who has sophisticated seven-point plans? 1.00

00:46:09.400 People who don't know how to do anything.

00:46:11.000 That's who.

00:46:14.040 There's no such thing as a sophisticated seven-point plan

00:46:16.980 that anybody ever pulled off.

00:46:19.280 Like, I don't even think Elon Musk

00:46:20.940 had a sophisticated seven-point plan 0.99

00:46:22.900 to get to fucking Mars. 0.99

00:46:24.780 It was probably more like a three-point plan. 0.99

00:46:28.860 Hire the best engineers.

00:46:31.560 Figure out the cheapest way to do it.

00:46:33.400 I don't think he had a sophisticated seven-point plan

00:46:38.120 at all.

00:46:40.620 I think maybe three, maximum.

00:46:43.780 And that's Elon Musk getting to Mars.

00:46:47.040 All right.

00:46:48.380 Three points, maximum.

00:46:51.120 So anybody who thinks that Trump

00:46:53.140 had a sophisticated seven-point plan

00:46:56.020 doesn't know, number one,

00:46:59.460 anything about Trump

00:47:00.660 because the secret to his success

00:47:02.780 was simplification.

00:47:05.280 Simplification

00:47:05.760 is almost the complete description

00:47:10.040 of why he works.

00:47:12.660 Trump simply takes all the complexity out of it.

00:47:15.660 And all you're left with,

00:47:17.760 build a wall.

00:47:19.660 Oh.

00:47:20.140 Okay.

00:47:21.140 Reduce regulations.

00:47:23.960 Oh.

00:47:24.900 Yeah.

00:47:25.520 Okay.

00:47:25.800 Make lots of energy.

00:47:27.620 Yeah, that makes sense.

00:47:31.880 Strong military.

00:47:34.600 Okay.

00:47:36.280 Right?

00:47:38.060 Am I wrong?

00:47:40.000 You could describe

00:47:41.100 almost every Trump policy

00:47:43.320 with less than a sentence.

00:47:47.620 You could describe

00:47:48.800 every Trump policy

00:47:49.920 with a sentence fragment.

00:47:52.980 You don't even need

00:47:54.160 the full sentence.

00:47:56.060 Am I right?

00:47:57.620 So the fact

00:47:58.860 that they're trying

00:47:59.360 to sell to the American public

00:48:00.820 that Trump,

00:48:02.040 of all people,

00:48:03.300 of all people,

00:48:04.880 the person who has had

00:48:05.720 the most success

00:48:06.680 in the world

00:48:07.220 was simplification.

00:48:08.820 And he had a sophisticated

00:48:10.080 seven-point plan

00:48:11.380 and no advisors

00:48:12.980 who apparently

00:48:13.780 thought it was a good idea.

00:48:15.920 Yeah.

00:48:16.440 Now, when people talk

00:48:17.420 about the four-dimensional chess,

00:48:19.480 he does know

00:48:20.160 how to persuade,

00:48:21.680 but that's right

00:48:22.260 in front of you.

00:48:23.800 Right?

00:48:24.060 There's nothing

00:48:24.700 sophisticated about it.

00:48:29.340 The technique

00:48:29.880 is very simple.

00:48:30.640 Make you think

00:48:31.240 past the sale.

00:48:32.680 Make you optimistic.

00:48:34.080 Bring energy.

00:48:35.500 Those are really

00:48:36.440 right in front of you.

00:48:38.640 And anybody can do them.

00:48:39.980 Right?

00:48:40.080 He just happens

00:48:40.680 to do them really well.

00:48:44.600 All right.

00:48:45.220 And also,

00:48:50.560 Liz Cheney's using words 0.99

00:48:52.480 like that Trump

00:48:53.480 lit the flame.

00:48:55.580 So the violence

00:48:56.540 of January 6th

00:48:58.040 is because

00:48:58.960 Trump lit the flame.

00:49:01.080 Now,

00:49:01.720 what legal standard

00:49:03.100 is that?

00:49:04.760 Can you remind me

00:49:05.780 of the legal standard

00:49:07.060 for lighting the flame?

00:49:10.280 I suppose if you yelled

00:49:11.360 fire in a crowded theater,

00:49:13.540 that would be an example.

00:49:15.320 But it's sort of a vague,

00:49:19.680 I mean,

00:49:20.300 you know,

00:49:20.580 the theater's

00:49:21.440 a specific example.

00:49:22.480 That's why it doesn't

00:49:23.020 work for anything else.

00:49:24.360 You can't really

00:49:24.960 generalize that one.

00:49:26.500 But the fact that

00:49:28.920 they have to use

00:49:29.480 such generalities,

00:49:31.260 if he had committed

00:49:32.480 a crime,

00:49:34.180 they would say,

00:49:35.020 he did X,

00:49:35.880 which is a crime.

00:49:37.260 But if you just

00:49:38.340 were talking

00:49:38.920 and then other things

00:49:39.880 happened,

00:49:41.060 you've got to say

00:49:41.680 stuff like,

00:49:42.280 he lit the flame.

00:49:43.160 And what if he did?

00:49:46.040 What if he did?

00:49:47.900 That's either a crime

00:49:49.480 or it's not.

00:49:52.960 There's not much else

00:49:54.060 to say about it, right?

00:49:55.320 If it's not a crime,

00:49:56.620 then it's free speech.

00:49:58.440 And what do you do

00:49:59.120 with that?

00:49:59.420 All right.

00:50:07.960 Let me ask you this.

00:50:10.940 Out of these 70,

00:50:12.300 how many Trump voters

00:50:13.700 were there?

00:50:14.160 70-some million?

00:50:15.640 74 million?

00:50:17.120 5 million?

00:50:18.360 How many Trump voters

00:50:19.360 were there?

00:50:20.780 76 million,

00:50:21.760 somebody says.

00:50:22.200 All right.

00:50:22.700 Of these 76 million

00:50:24.120 Trump voters,

00:50:24.740 how many of them

00:50:27.040 would have protested

00:50:28.060 the Capitol

00:50:28.580 under the following

00:50:29.980 conditions?

00:50:31.800 They got an election

00:50:33.060 result they didn't like.

00:50:34.520 In other words,

00:50:35.040 their candidate lost.

00:50:37.020 And the election

00:50:39.300 system itself

00:50:40.240 could be

00:50:41.860 or had been

00:50:42.740 reliably audited.

00:50:45.980 Under the conditions

00:50:47.220 that your candidate

00:50:48.140 lost,

00:50:48.800 let's say you're

00:50:49.200 Republican,

00:50:50.580 your candidate lost,

00:50:51.780 if you believe

00:50:53.180 that the election

00:50:54.800 had been

00:50:55.600 reliably audited,

00:50:58.640 reliably audited,

00:51:00.600 so that you knew

00:51:01.260 that your candidate

00:51:02.360 really lost.

00:51:03.800 How many,

00:51:05.240 give me an exact number

00:51:06.400 of the 76 million

00:51:08.460 Trump voters,

00:51:09.540 how many of them

00:51:10.240 would have marched

00:51:10.900 on the Capitol

00:51:11.620 because they lost

00:51:13.560 for an election

00:51:15.140 that was

00:51:15.660 reliably audited? 0.99

00:51:19.960 Still fucking zero. 0.98

00:51:21.780 It's still zero. 1.00

00:51:24.140 It's 69.

00:51:25.740 420.

00:51:29.300 It's still zero.

00:51:31.820 Now,

00:51:33.100 is that not

00:51:33.820 important context?

00:51:37.100 Just think about it.

00:51:39.360 The most important

00:51:40.580 context of this story

00:51:41.840 is that if this election

00:51:43.620 could have been

00:51:44.780 reliably audited

00:51:47.380 or even was credible,

00:51:48.900 not a single person

00:51:51.240 would have protested.

00:51:52.760 Not one.

00:51:53.980 In fact,

00:51:55.360 I'll bet you can't

00:51:56.140 get an interview

00:51:56.680 with one person

00:51:57.500 who has said,

00:51:57.960 you know,

00:51:58.900 even if the election

00:51:59.860 was clearly

00:52:01.220 a Biden victory,

00:52:02.580 fair and square,

00:52:03.640 I still wanted

00:52:04.540 to overthrow

00:52:05.140 the government.

00:52:07.200 Not one.

00:52:08.860 How do we not

00:52:09.820 mention that

00:52:10.460 every time

00:52:11.360 this topic

00:52:12.420 comes up?

00:52:13.420 Because it's the

00:52:14.320 single most important

00:52:15.240 thing.

00:52:15.540 Because what the

00:52:16.700 bad guys

00:52:17.340 have allowed

00:52:18.200 you to do

00:52:18.840 is to think

00:52:19.680 past the sale.

00:52:22.040 They're making

00:52:23.160 you think past

00:52:24.120 the election

00:52:24.920 being credible

00:52:26.720 because it

00:52:28.500 hasn't been

00:52:29.160 proven fraudulent,

00:52:31.180 which is a

00:52:31.900 different topic.

00:52:33.320 We know it

00:52:34.280 hasn't been

00:52:34.780 proven fraudulent,

00:52:37.220 at least in the

00:52:38.220 courts.

00:52:38.480 we don't know

00:52:40.440 that it was

00:52:41.020 a credible

00:52:41.560 election

00:52:42.060 that if you

00:52:42.840 audited it

00:52:43.480 you'd get

00:52:43.860 the same

00:52:44.300 result.

00:52:45.500 Because you

00:52:45.760 can't fully

00:52:46.280 audit our

00:52:46.760 elections.

00:52:49.640 So how is

00:52:50.840 that not

00:52:51.200 the most

00:52:51.820 important

00:52:52.340 context

00:52:52.980 that not

00:52:54.000 a single

00:52:54.460 person would

00:52:55.040 have protested

00:52:55.780 if they

00:52:56.160 believed the

00:52:57.900 credibility

00:52:58.420 of the

00:52:58.980 system?

00:52:59.920 Just the

00:53:00.380 credibility.

00:53:01.940 And yet,

00:53:03.420 which one

00:53:04.780 of the 1.00

00:53:05.120 assholes 1.00

00:53:05.620 in the 0.97

00:53:06.140 January 6th

00:53:06.880 hearing

00:53:07.180 is working

00:53:08.360 on fixing

00:53:08.900 the root

00:53:09.360 problem.

00:53:10.920 It's a

00:53:11.580 root problem

00:53:12.140 that made

00:53:12.620 tens of

00:53:13.840 millions of

00:53:14.320 people support

00:53:16.060 the people

00:53:16.540 who marched

00:53:17.060 on the

00:53:17.620 Capitol.

00:53:19.800 That was

00:53:20.500 the root

00:53:20.820 problem.

00:53:21.840 So you

00:53:22.020 got Kamala

00:53:22.540 Harris working

00:53:23.180 on the root

00:53:23.640 problem in

00:53:24.200 Central America.

00:53:26.240 And do you

00:53:26.680 know what her

00:53:27.000 solution was?

00:53:28.140 She finally

00:53:28.740 came up with

00:53:29.380 a solution.

00:53:30.780 She said we

00:53:31.300 have to work

00:53:31.720 together.

00:53:32.540 I just saw a

00:53:33.140 clip of it

00:53:33.560 today.

00:53:34.540 And I hadn't

00:53:35.080 thought of that.

00:53:35.900 But apparently

00:53:36.400 if we work

00:53:37.660 together with

00:53:39.200 the Central

00:53:39.700 American

00:53:40.080 countries,

00:53:41.320 problem solved.

00:53:42.720 And nobody

00:53:43.440 had come up

00:53:43.940 with that

00:53:44.200 solution until

00:53:44.940 she did.

00:53:46.080 A lot of

00:53:46.520 people were

00:53:46.900 like, well,

00:53:47.260 what are we

00:53:47.520 going to do

00:53:47.820 about this?

00:53:48.520 Let's fight.

00:53:50.560 Well, fight?

00:53:52.980 We're part of

00:53:53.620 your continent.

00:53:54.400 We have no

00:53:55.040 beef with you.

00:53:55.740 I don't know.

00:53:56.600 It's just what

00:53:57.080 we do.

00:53:58.120 Let's fight.

00:53:59.500 Wait a minute.

00:54:00.040 Wait a minute.

00:54:00.480 Why don't we

00:54:00.920 work together?

00:54:01.740 And like, wait

00:54:02.560 a minute.

00:54:02.960 What did I

00:54:03.360 just hear?

00:54:04.640 Why don't we

00:54:05.200 work together?

00:54:06.400 Say that

00:54:08.360 again.

00:54:09.760 Why don't we

00:54:10.260 work together?

00:54:13.480 Is there a

00:54:14.300 book on this?

00:54:15.840 Because it

00:54:16.200 feels like,

00:54:17.460 I mean, I

00:54:19.780 hadn't thought

00:54:20.260 of it, but

00:54:20.840 when you hear

00:54:21.920 it, it's

00:54:22.400 like, is

00:54:24.480 this coming

00:54:24.840 from some

00:54:25.280 famous philosopher

00:54:26.160 or something?

00:54:26.740 Work together.

00:54:28.660 This, I

00:54:30.340 feel like this

00:54:30.840 could work.

00:54:31.860 This could

00:54:32.280 work.

00:54:32.660 look, let's

00:54:34.460 tell Kamala

00:54:34.980 Harris that we

00:54:35.600 came up with

00:54:36.060 a solution.

00:54:36.660 And they

00:54:36.900 call the

00:54:37.200 meeting.

00:54:38.520 And Kamala

00:54:38.940 is there,

00:54:39.340 and she

00:54:40.020 says, I

00:54:41.180 assumed she

00:54:41.680 would say

00:54:41.940 this, so,

00:54:43.480 why are we

00:54:45.200 here?

00:54:45.440 And then they

00:54:59.900 say, we

00:55:00.420 came up with

00:55:00.900 a solution

00:55:01.460 for

00:55:02.120 immigration.

00:55:04.400 Let's hear

00:55:04.980 it.

00:55:08.440 We could

00:55:09.060 work together.

00:55:09.700 We could

00:55:10.800 work together.

00:55:14.880 That could 0.68

00:55:18.680 work.

00:55:19.920 And so

00:55:20.680 there we

00:55:21.000 have.

00:55:21.820 Problem solved.

00:55:23.600 There's been,

00:55:24.440 we have a

00:55:25.000 solution.

00:55:25.600 There's been a

00:55:26.000 speech about

00:55:26.540 it.

00:55:27.240 Bada bong. 0.96

00:55:29.060 But 76

00:55:29.900 million Trump

00:55:30.620 supporters,

00:55:31.580 all concerned

00:55:32.480 about one

00:55:33.040 problem, which

00:55:33.720 is election

00:55:34.300 credibility,

00:55:35.880 and 750

00:55:37.740 million,

00:55:39.700 now there's

00:55:41.460 fewer than

00:55:42.100 that.

00:55:42.760 But a lot 1.00

00:55:43.480 of assholes 1.00

00:55:43.940 in Congress 1.00

00:55:44.580 who are

00:55:45.240 making you

00:55:45.720 think that

00:55:46.140 the real

00:55:46.480 problem is

00:55:47.200 that you're

00:55:47.520 complaining

00:55:47.920 about it.

00:55:48.800 Let me

00:55:49.120 say it

00:55:49.400 again.

00:55:50.900 76

00:55:51.460 million

00:55:52.040 Trump

00:55:52.500 voters,

00:55:53.200 not one

00:55:53.900 of them,

00:55:54.840 would have

00:55:55.320 protested

00:55:56.520 an election

00:55:57.640 that had

00:55:58.660 been held

00:55:59.040 in a

00:55:59.500 credible,

00:56:00.540 transparent

00:56:00.900 way.

00:56:01.960 I'm not

00:56:02.640 saying it

00:56:02.960 was fraudulent.

00:56:04.340 I'm saying

00:56:04.780 that you

00:56:05.140 can't have

00:56:05.520 credibility

00:56:06.120 unless you

00:56:06.720 have transparency,

00:56:07.640 and we

00:56:07.820 didn't have

00:56:08.180 full transparency.

00:56:09.700 So it

00:56:10.140 wasn't

00:56:10.380 credible.

00:56:12.160 So the

00:56:12.520 problem,

00:56:14.380 the solution

00:56:15.080 to the

00:56:16.360 gigantic

00:56:16.840 problem

00:56:17.480 of not

00:56:20.720 having

00:56:21.040 election

00:56:21.420 credibility,

00:56:23.040 the solution

00:56:23.700 is to

00:56:25.300 blame the

00:56:25.780 people who

00:56:26.200 complained

00:56:26.540 about it,

00:56:27.820 and make

00:56:28.280 it a public

00:56:29.160 show trial

00:56:29.860 of the

00:56:30.680 people who

00:56:31.140 complained

00:56:31.520 about it.

00:56:32.300 Now, of

00:56:32.600 course, they

00:56:32.860 did more

00:56:33.200 than that.

00:56:33.640 There was

00:56:33.860 violence.

00:56:35.640 And, of

00:56:35.880 course, they

00:56:36.720 like to

00:56:37.100 conflate the

00:56:37.740 violence with

00:56:38.420 the other

00:56:39.000 issue, right?

00:56:40.060 So as

00:56:40.640 long as

00:56:40.980 they can

00:56:41.220 make you

00:56:41.700 distracted

00:56:42.540 over to

00:56:43.100 look at

00:56:43.400 the

00:56:43.560 violence,

00:56:44.380 which there

00:56:44.720 was,

00:56:47.000 then you

00:56:48.800 don't get

00:56:49.560 to talk

00:56:49.980 about the

00:56:50.480 only thing

00:56:50.860 that mattered,

00:56:51.680 which is you

00:56:52.520 weren't quite

00:56:52.980 sure that we

00:56:53.480 have a real

00:56:53.920 election system

00:56:54.700 in this

00:56:55.000 country.

00:56:56.100 And not

00:56:56.520 one of those

00:56:57.260 people in

00:56:57.740 Congress is

00:56:58.300 working on it.

00:56:59.220 If you were

00:56:59.720 the news,

00:57:02.060 if I were a

00:57:03.260 reporter, I'd 0.51

00:57:03.760 say, you know,

00:57:04.760 76 million

00:57:05.560 people were

00:57:06.140 concerned about

00:57:06.920 election

00:57:07.600 integrity, and

00:57:09.080 so that would

00:57:09.600 make that

00:57:10.000 really the

00:57:10.380 biggest problem

00:57:11.080 in our

00:57:12.380 political system

00:57:13.160 to fix, what

00:57:14.840 were you doing

00:57:15.460 today on that

00:57:16.620 problem?

00:57:17.800 Oh, I was

00:57:18.400 complaining about

00:57:19.320 the people who

00:57:19.940 complained about

00:57:20.600 it.

00:57:22.720 That is a

00:57:23.740 whole new

00:57:24.200 level of

00:57:24.720 worthlessness.

00:57:26.300 Let me list

00:57:27.240 the worthlessness

00:57:27.940 levels.

00:57:28.520 Number one, the

00:57:30.700 best thing you

00:57:31.260 could do is

00:57:31.840 there's a

00:57:32.200 problem and

00:57:32.780 then you

00:57:33.040 work on it

00:57:33.620 like with a

00:57:34.140 real solution.

00:57:35.800 That's the

00:57:36.180 best you could

00:57:36.580 do.

00:57:37.240 Number two

00:57:37.860 would be there's

00:57:38.300 a problem and

00:57:38.960 you work on

00:57:39.440 it, but you

00:57:39.800 don't have

00:57:40.140 kind of the

00:57:40.740 right solution.

00:57:42.760 That's not as

00:57:43.460 good.

00:57:44.220 But at least

00:57:44.600 you tried.

00:57:46.080 You put some

00:57:46.680 effort into it.

00:57:47.360 You worked on

00:57:47.860 it.

00:57:49.100 Below that

00:57:49.880 would be

00:57:51.760 doing nothing.

00:57:53.840 Doing nothing

00:57:54.560 would be worse

00:57:55.660 than trying

00:57:56.700 something that

00:57:57.280 didn't work

00:57:57.720 out, because

00:57:58.220 at least

00:57:58.460 you know

00:57:58.780 what doesn't

00:57:59.220 work out

00:57:59.600 next time.

00:58:00.600 So that's

00:58:00.980 below.

00:58:01.900 But there

00:58:02.280 is one

00:58:03.540 new level

00:58:04.440 below that.

00:58:06.140 Do you

00:58:06.380 know what

00:58:06.580 that is?

00:58:07.980 It's not

00:58:09.060 fixing the

00:58:09.660 problem, not

00:58:10.940 trying and

00:58:11.500 failing to

00:58:11.960 fix the

00:58:12.280 problem, not

00:58:13.300 ignoring the 1.00

00:58:13.940 fucking 1.00

00:58:14.200 problem. 1.00

00:58:15.080 It's

00:58:15.600 demonizing the

00:58:16.520 people who

00:58:16.980 complained about 1.00

00:58:17.680 the fucking 1.00

00:58:18.240 problem. 1.00

00:58:20.580 That is the

00:58:21.700 lowest level

00:58:22.900 of human

00:58:25.240 behavior.

00:58:26.720 It's barely 0.99

00:58:27.860 fucking 0.99

00:58:28.480 civilized. 0.99

00:58:33.440 Barely,

00:58:33.960 barely,

00:58:34.540 barely 0.99

00:58:35.640 fucking 0.99

00:58:36.880 civilized. 0.99

00:58:39.320 It's not

00:58:40.000 American.

00:58:41.540 I don't

00:58:42.120 know what 1.00

00:58:42.320 the fuck 0.99

00:58:42.700 it is, but 0.99

00:58:43.200 it's not

00:58:43.480 American.

00:58:44.580 We can all

00:58:45.180 agree on

00:58:45.540 that.

00:58:46.680 Do you

00:58:46.940 know who

00:58:47.240 is more

00:58:47.940 American than

00:58:49.180 these 1.00

00:58:49.380 motherfuckers 1.00

00:58:50.100 who are 1.00

00:58:51.440 selling this

00:58:52.060 one-sided

00:58:52.560 propaganda to

00:58:53.480 the country

00:58:53.860 and ignoring

00:58:54.420 the real

00:58:54.760 problems?

00:58:55.920 Do you

00:58:56.120 know who's

00:58:56.440 more American

00:58:57.260 than every 1.00

00:58:58.100 fucking one 1.00

00:58:58.920 of them? 1.00

00:59:01.460 The

00:59:01.980 caravans.

00:59:03.860 The

00:59:04.380 caravans

00:59:04.900 coming across

00:59:05.480 the border.

00:59:07.900 Yeah.

00:59:08.780 Now, I'm

00:59:09.360 not in

00:59:09.760 favor of

00:59:10.220 open

00:59:10.500 immigration,

00:59:11.980 but I'm

00:59:12.800 just saying

00:59:13.260 let's put

00:59:13.660 it in

00:59:13.920 perspective.

00:59:15.380 Who is

00:59:16.060 more

00:59:16.300 American?

00:59:17.440 The people

00:59:18.240 coming across

00:59:18.940 illegal in the

00:59:19.780 caravans who

00:59:20.440 want to be

00:59:20.820 part of this

00:59:21.260 country, buy

00:59:21.980 into the

00:59:22.380 system in

00:59:23.200 enough of

00:59:23.900 a way that

00:59:25.040 they'd rather

00:59:25.460 be here than

00:59:26.000 somewhere else.

00:59:27.280 Who is more

00:59:27.920 American?

00:59:30.800 It's easy.

00:59:32.920 Let me ask

00:59:33.720 you another

00:59:34.020 question.

00:59:36.940 Who would

00:59:37.640 you trust?

00:59:39.940 Who would

00:59:40.600 you trust?

00:59:43.220 Liz Cheney

00:59:44.180 or a

00:59:45.840 random

00:59:46.360 member of

00:59:48.120 a Central

00:59:49.120 American

00:59:49.500 caravan?

00:59:51.980 Who would

00:59:52.500 you trust?

00:59:53.220 Just in

00:59:53.600 any sort

00:59:54.500 of random

00:59:54.920 situation.

00:59:56.360 Who would

00:59:56.640 you trust?

01:00:01.540 I mean,

01:00:02.220 really, our

01:00:02.960 priorities are

01:00:03.800 so wrong

01:00:05.160 here.

01:00:06.240 So wrong.

01:00:11.320 So, did I

01:00:12.840 hear that there

01:00:13.320 are two more

01:00:13.780 weeks of this?

01:00:15.380 Is that

01:00:15.820 true?

01:00:19.000 Do I still

01:00:19.740 think it'll

01:00:20.120 backfire?

01:00:20.640 No.

01:00:21.700 No, I

01:00:22.120 don't think

01:00:22.540 the hearings

01:00:23.920 will backfire.

01:00:24.620 I think that

01:00:25.040 they will be

01:00:26.120 completely

01:00:26.580 successful as

01:00:28.420 an anti-American

01:00:30.600 propaganda

01:00:31.860 attack on

01:00:33.480 citizens of

01:00:34.220 this country.

01:00:35.160 I think it

01:00:35.840 will work

01:00:36.340 exactly the

01:00:37.420 way they

01:00:37.700 intended it

01:00:38.140 to.

01:00:38.540 Because the

01:00:39.200 quality of

01:00:40.200 the persuasion

01:00:41.260 is very

01:00:41.700 good.

01:00:43.120 So if I

01:00:43.540 haven't said

01:00:43.940 that again,

01:00:44.740 let me say,

01:00:45.780 if I were

01:00:46.300 just analyzing

01:00:47.700 the technique,

01:00:49.340 unfortunately,

01:00:50.180 it's really

01:00:50.460 good.

01:00:52.380 Really good.

01:00:54.640 A plus.

01:00:57.860 No minds

01:00:58.720 will be

01:00:59.020 changed?

01:00:59.760 Probably.

01:01:00.620 Not many.

01:01:02.660 But I

01:01:03.640 wonder if

01:01:04.140 anybody had

01:01:04.680 the same

01:01:05.140 feeling I

01:01:06.600 did.

01:01:07.640 While I was

01:01:08.440 watching it,

01:01:09.020 I would hear

01:01:09.380 them make

01:01:09.840 claims about

01:01:10.700 how Trump

01:01:11.280 inspired it,

01:01:12.520 the violence,

01:01:13.040 and they

01:01:13.980 would play

01:01:14.480 clips of

01:01:15.780 Trump talking

01:01:16.580 and I'd

01:01:17.620 say, oh,

01:01:18.140 here it is

01:01:18.580 where he's

01:01:19.000 going to say

01:01:19.400 something and

01:01:20.680 then he

01:01:20.960 doesn't.

01:01:22.860 And then

01:01:23.380 they say,

01:01:23.900 and then

01:01:24.180 Trump keeps

01:01:25.120 inspiring this

01:01:25.900 violence,

01:01:26.900 here's another

01:01:27.420 clip of him.

01:01:28.200 And I'm like,

01:01:28.600 okay, here it

01:01:29.200 comes.

01:01:30.080 I'm listening

01:01:30.560 to it and

01:01:31.080 then he

01:01:32.360 doesn't do

01:01:32.700 anything like

01:01:33.160 that.

01:01:34.720 And I

01:01:35.040 think, well,

01:01:36.280 they must be

01:01:36.760 saving the

01:01:37.280 good ones for

01:01:37.980 later, but I'm

01:01:38.760 too busy to

01:01:39.380 watch it all,

01:01:40.120 so there must

01:01:41.300 be good ones

01:01:41.860 there.

01:01:42.100 They're just

01:01:43.420 waiting for the

01:01:44.000 good ones.

01:01:45.300 But I don't

01:01:45.960 think there are

01:01:46.560 any good ones.

01:01:48.640 We probably

01:01:49.460 would have seen

01:01:49.900 those first.

01:01:52.240 So it seems

01:01:53.080 like the entire

01:01:54.020 argument against

01:01:55.320 Trump comes

01:01:56.060 down to his

01:01:56.820 backwards talk.

01:01:58.560 That when he

01:01:59.380 says stuff like,

01:02:00.800 you only need

01:02:01.740 to find 11,000

01:02:02.980 votes, if an

01:02:05.700 honest person

01:02:06.440 said that about

01:02:07.620 an election,

01:02:08.300 hey, you

01:02:09.560 know, I'm not

01:02:10.500 sure this election

01:02:11.140 was right.

01:02:12.100 right, and I

01:02:12.840 would win if

01:02:13.620 you could find

01:02:14.120 11,000 votes.

01:02:15.540 You know, you

01:02:15.880 only need to

01:02:16.320 find 11,000

01:02:17.100 votes.

01:02:18.060 Do you think

01:02:18.440 you could do

01:02:18.780 that?

01:02:19.720 Now, if the

01:02:20.340 person saying

01:02:20.960 that was

01:02:22.700 someone that

01:02:23.240 you knew to

01:02:23.880 be honest,

01:02:25.700 you knew to

01:02:26.340 be honest,

01:02:27.900 you'd say to

01:02:29.060 yourself, oh,

01:02:29.740 what he means,

01:02:30.760 or she means,

01:02:32.160 is legally

01:02:33.220 audit and

01:02:34.880 make sure

01:02:35.220 there's not

01:02:35.740 any votes

01:02:37.520 votes that

01:02:37.800 can't be

01:02:38.200 thrown out.

01:02:39.680 But, because

01:02:40.680 it's Trump,

01:02:41.980 it's backwards

01:02:42.660 talk.

01:02:44.260 I want you

01:02:45.500 to find

01:02:45.960 votes really

01:02:47.120 means I

01:02:47.600 want you to

01:02:48.000 manufacture them.

01:02:50.260 Because finding

01:02:51.180 them and

01:02:53.120 manufacturing them

01:02:54.260 is not really

01:02:55.440 the same thing,

01:02:56.120 is it?

01:02:57.940 I want you

01:02:58.700 to take care

01:02:59.640 of the cat.

01:03:01.100 Okay, I'll 1.00

01:03:01.680 kill it. 1.00

01:03:02.640 No, I 1.00

01:03:03.340 mean, feed

01:03:03.980 it, give

01:03:04.380 it water.

01:03:05.980 I want you

01:03:06.720 to find

01:03:07.400 11,000 votes.

01:03:08.960 Okay, we'll

01:03:09.920 fraudulently add

01:03:11.620 11,000 votes.

01:03:12.540 No, no.

01:03:13.760 Don't fraudulently

01:03:14.620 add them.

01:03:15.480 Just go find

01:03:16.200 them.

01:03:16.380 They're probably

01:03:16.700 there, legally,

01:03:17.940 in a big box

01:03:18.560 somewhere, not

01:03:19.020 counted.

01:03:21.580 The entire

01:03:22.500 thing is

01:03:23.820 getting people

01:03:24.380 to buy that

01:03:24.960 he talks

01:03:25.500 backwards.

01:03:26.720 When he

01:03:27.140 talked to

01:03:27.580 Zelensky in

01:03:28.280 his perfect

01:03:28.780 phone call,

01:03:30.720 you had to

01:03:31.480 assume,

01:03:32.600 that when

01:03:32.900 he said,

01:03:33.560 you know,

01:03:33.820 we want

01:03:34.200 you to

01:03:34.420 look into

01:03:34.780 this Biden

01:03:35.520 corruption

01:03:36.040 stuff, that

01:03:37.860 if he had

01:03:38.320 been an

01:03:38.640 honest person,

01:03:39.400 you'd say,

01:03:39.840 whoa, here's

01:03:40.980 an honest

01:03:41.380 person who

01:03:42.100 wants to

01:03:42.520 find out if

01:03:43.180 something terrible

01:03:43.920 is happening

01:03:44.480 over in

01:03:44.840 Ukraine that

01:03:46.040 the whole

01:03:46.340 country should

01:03:46.880 know about

01:03:47.360 and really

01:03:48.060 would affect

01:03:48.820 our politics

01:03:50.180 and maybe

01:03:50.680 even nuclear

01:03:51.680 war, like 0.78

01:03:52.900 most important

01:03:53.480 thing you could

01:03:53.880 ever know

01:03:54.240 about, and

01:03:55.120 he's asking

01:03:55.620 for help

01:03:56.560 getting this

01:03:57.040 information.

01:03:58.040 Now, if

01:03:58.360 you trusted

01:03:58.920 Trump, that's

01:04:00.860 how you'd

01:04:01.240 interpret it.

01:04:02.100 you know,

01:04:02.700 hey, can

01:04:03.040 you help

01:04:03.460 us look

01:04:03.820 into this

01:04:04.400 Biden

01:04:05.260 situation?

01:04:06.820 But, since

01:04:08.100 we know

01:04:08.480 Trump does

01:04:09.160 backwards

01:04:10.100 talk, when

01:04:11.840 he said,

01:04:13.120 hey, can

01:04:13.760 you look

01:04:14.040 into this

01:04:14.460 Biden

01:04:14.880 situation,

01:04:15.840 what he

01:04:16.300 really meant

01:04:17.140 was, can

01:04:19.400 you give

01:04:20.020 us something

01:04:20.360 like that

01:04:20.780 steel dossier

01:04:21.640 where you

01:04:22.640 just make

01:04:23.120 up a bunch

01:04:23.540 of stuff

01:04:23.980 and then I

01:04:24.840 use it to

01:04:25.300 defeat my

01:04:25.780 political

01:04:26.140 opponents?

01:04:26.700 see, that's

01:04:29.240 backwards

01:04:29.720 talk.

01:04:32.160 And so,

01:04:33.140 half of the

01:04:33.720 country has

01:04:34.300 actually

01:04:34.840 literally been

01:04:36.000 convinced that

01:04:37.460 the president

01:04:38.040 talks backwards

01:04:38.920 and that when

01:04:40.760 he says,

01:04:41.880 you know,

01:04:42.760 try to inject

01:04:43.660 light into the

01:04:44.440 lungs for

01:04:46.100 coronavirus,

01:04:47.240 what that

01:04:48.320 really means

01:04:48.900 is, you

01:04:49.640 know, make

01:04:51.420 them drink

01:04:51.820 bleach and

01:04:52.340 then sleep

01:04:52.780 with the

01:04:53.000 fishes.

01:04:53.260 I guess.

01:04:57.380 Or that

01:04:58.240 when he

01:04:58.520 says that

01:04:59.020 there were

01:04:59.320 some fine

01:05:00.280 people who

01:05:02.160 were just

01:05:02.580 at the

01:05:02.960 Charlottesville

01:05:03.500 protest about

01:05:04.480 the statues

01:05:05.020 and they

01:05:05.400 were not

01:05:05.820 with the

01:05:06.600 racists at

01:05:07.380 all, that

01:05:08.980 what he

01:05:09.260 really means

01:05:09.760 is, they

01:05:10.580 were totally

01:05:10.980 with the

01:05:11.280 racists. 0.97

01:05:12.200 They are 0.99

01:05:12.520 the racists.

01:05:13.700 See,

01:05:13.960 backwards

01:05:14.320 talk.

01:05:15.120 It's

01:05:15.240 backwards

01:05:15.540 talk.

01:05:21.320 Now,

01:05:21.840 can we

01:05:23.920 conclude

01:05:24.460 already

01:05:26.600 that this

01:05:27.200 is the

01:05:27.520 best

01:05:27.940 live stream

01:05:28.520 you've

01:05:28.780 ever seen

01:05:29.440 on politics

01:05:31.020 and especially

01:05:31.740 this topic?

01:05:34.920 Yeah, I

01:05:35.480 don't.

01:05:36.360 It really

01:05:36.720 is.

01:05:42.720 Somebody

01:05:43.240 says the

01:05:43.660 Oath Keepers

01:05:44.180 are CIA.

01:05:45.420 Well, don't

01:05:45.780 you assume

01:05:46.220 that all

01:05:47.240 of these

01:05:47.540 groups are

01:05:48.160 infiltrated?

01:05:50.040 Boy, I'll

01:05:51.760 tell you one

01:05:52.240 thing, though.

01:05:52.740 There's one

01:05:53.320 thing that

01:05:53.760 the video

01:05:55.820 of the

01:05:56.240 event does

01:05:57.640 really well.

01:05:58.720 Have you

01:05:59.100 noticed that

01:06:00.200 the Proud

01:06:01.440 Boys have 0.69

01:06:02.160 one characteristic,

01:06:03.360 aside from

01:06:04.000 being white 0.67

01:06:04.980 and male,

01:06:05.520 most of

01:06:05.840 them, one

01:06:07.760 characteristic?

01:06:09.380 They're kind

01:06:09.780 of big,

01:06:10.260 aren't they?

01:06:11.880 Have you

01:06:12.220 noticed how

01:06:12.780 big the

01:06:13.380 Proud Boys

01:06:13.840 are?

01:06:14.840 I mean,

01:06:15.200 they're just

01:06:15.660 big.

01:06:17.660 They're just

01:06:18.020 really big.

01:06:20.040 I don't

01:06:21.400 know if

01:06:21.660 you would

01:06:21.920 join if

01:06:22.480 you were

01:06:22.780 five foot

01:06:24.560 six.

01:06:26.460 But the

01:06:27.200 thing that

01:06:28.060 you don't

01:06:28.840 realize when

01:06:29.440 you just

01:06:29.720 hear about

01:06:30.220 it is

01:06:31.300 that when

01:06:31.620 you see

01:06:31.960 what the

01:06:32.440 police and

01:06:33.360 law enforcement

01:06:33.940 were up

01:06:34.440 against,

01:06:35.760 and given

01:06:36.220 that the

01:06:36.660 law enforcement

01:06:37.320 were not

01:06:38.520 using deadly

01:06:39.260 force,

01:06:40.480 they didn't

01:06:40.860 have a

01:06:41.120 chance.

01:06:42.900 I mean,

01:06:43.180 they didn't

01:06:43.460 have a

01:06:43.720 chance.

01:06:46.100 Just the

01:06:46.820 sheer size

01:06:47.840 of the

01:06:48.520 Proud Boys,

01:06:49.660 they just

01:06:49.980 pushed the

01:06:50.640 law enforcement

01:06:51.140 back.

01:06:57.280 Yeah.

01:07:01.600 Well,

01:07:02.100 anyway,

01:07:02.320 that's all

01:07:02.580 I've got

01:07:02.760 for now.

01:07:06.060 This does

01:07:06.700 not work

01:07:07.180 without owning

01:07:07.740 the media,

01:07:08.240 yeah.

01:07:08.620 Everything

01:07:09.020 that the

01:07:09.460 bad guys

01:07:09.980 are doing

01:07:10.420 with this

01:07:12.100 January 6th

01:07:12.820 hearings,

01:07:13.280 none of

01:07:13.780 this would

01:07:14.140 work unless

01:07:15.680 the media

01:07:16.220 was illegitimate.

01:07:19.240 Did you

01:07:19.580 see some

01:07:19.940 of the

01:07:20.140 titles that

01:07:21.740 some of

01:07:21.960 the networks

01:07:22.420 were doing?

01:07:23.640 Attack on

01:07:24.260 Democracy.

01:07:26.960 So,

01:07:27.560 was it

01:07:28.900 CNN?

01:07:29.680 I think

01:07:30.020 it was

01:07:30.200 CNN,

01:07:31.420 or maybe

01:07:32.180 ABC,

01:07:32.760 but one

01:07:33.140 of them

01:07:33.360 was Attack

01:07:34.000 on Democracy.

01:07:36.500 And I'm

01:07:36.960 thinking to

01:07:37.360 myself,

01:07:38.020 I feel like

01:07:38.800 that's making

01:07:39.320 you think

01:07:39.820 past the

01:07:40.400 sale.

01:07:41.520 Because if

01:07:42.320 there's one

01:07:42.840 thing that

01:07:43.640 a group of

01:07:44.240 people with

01:07:44.920 American flags

01:07:45.860 chanting

01:07:46.900 USA

01:07:47.880 wants,

01:07:50.620 I feel like

01:07:51.580 they wanted

01:07:51.980 to protect

01:07:52.600 democracy.

01:07:54.140 The entire

01:07:54.960 point of

01:07:55.600 it was

01:07:56.940 in their

01:07:57.420 minds,

01:07:58.920 and you

01:07:59.520 can argue

01:08:00.160 they were

01:08:00.460 wrong,

01:08:01.560 of course,

01:08:03.100 but in

01:08:04.680 their minds

01:08:05.100 they were

01:08:05.320 there to

01:08:05.700 protect

01:08:06.140 democracy.

01:08:07.860 And the

01:08:09.040 news,

01:08:09.660 the fake

01:08:10.000 news,

01:08:10.480 has the 0.99

01:08:11.180 balls that 0.99

01:08:13.440 they should

01:08:13.780 dip in

01:08:14.100 chocolate.

01:08:14.920 To

01:08:15.800 I don't

01:08:22.060 even have

01:08:22.360 to finish

01:08:22.720 the thought.

01:08:24.300 I'll be

01:08:24.800 like

01:08:25.100 Biden,

01:08:26.120 just trail

01:08:26.780 off.

01:08:32.540 Okay.

01:08:33.620 I think

01:08:34.280 I've changed

01:08:34.740 the world

01:08:35.140 once again

01:08:35.800 and

01:08:36.460 solved most

01:08:39.060 of our

01:08:39.320 problems.

01:08:39.800 Let's say

01:08:40.060 I solved

01:08:40.560 immigration,

01:08:41.500 if we want

01:08:42.060 to solve

01:08:42.340 it.

01:08:43.400 And now

01:08:45.540 you understand

01:08:46.020 everything about

01:08:46.680 January 6th.

01:08:48.040 I think we did

01:08:48.680 good work here.

01:08:49.660 I'll talk to you

01:08:50.180 tomorrow,

01:08:50.500 YouTube.

01:08:50.680 I'll talk to you

01:08:51.160 tomorrow, YouTube.

01:08:51.840 I know you

01:09:01.500 for

01:09:03.020 coming out of

01:09:03.760 uri,

01:09:05.540 for

01:09:06.720 everyone

01:09:06.960 wants to

01:09:08.280 speak to you

01:09:09.300 the

01:09:10.740 continue to

01:09:11.100 talk to you

01:09:12.840 before

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 10, 2022

Episode 1770 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About The January 6 Kangaroo Court. You Won't Want To Miss This

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript