Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1774 Scott Adams： Let Me Tell You What You Don't Know About The J6 Hearings And The Election

00:00:00.900 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best experience in your entire life.

00:00:08.640 Some say it's the highlight of human civilization, and I say, no, no, it's not the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:16.580 It's the highlight of all civilizations and all creatures throughout the universe.

00:00:23.240 Now, that's a fact.

00:00:25.100 And if you'd like to take it up a notch, it wouldn't be hard.

00:00:28.180 All you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tankard chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:36.500 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:39.240 I like coffee.

00:00:41.600 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:45.460 You can feel it already.

00:00:46.920 I know you can.

00:00:48.200 I know you can.

00:00:49.380 There's a little tingle on your arm, back of your neck.

00:00:53.440 Are you starting to feel your dopamine engine kicking in?

00:00:57.520 Yeah, it always kicks in about now.

00:00:59.800 This is the trigger.

00:01:00.800 This is the time.

00:01:01.720 This is the key.

00:01:02.680 It's happening now.

00:01:04.260 Go.

00:01:09.520 All right, now here's a question for all of you, both on Locals platform and YouTube.

00:01:17.600 For those of you who have been doing the simultaneous sip for some time now, how many of you can feel an actual physical sensation during the simultaneous sip?

00:01:31.880 How many of you actually feel a lift, like legitimately, physically?

00:01:41.680 All right.

00:01:42.900 So you can see in the comments, quite a few of you.

00:01:47.160 Is that an accident?

00:01:49.500 Do you think it's an accident?

00:01:50.800 Is it just because you like the live stream?

00:01:56.920 And so, of course, you naturally feel good when you're doing things you like.

00:02:00.080 Is it just that?

00:02:01.800 No.

00:02:03.120 It's more than that.

00:02:05.360 Now, I tell you this because persuasion to be ethical should also be fully disclosed.

00:02:12.740 In other words, you should only be persuaded in ways you think are good for you.

00:02:17.640 And if you don't want to be persuaded that way, you should know what's happening so you can act accordingly.

00:02:23.160 And it is my intention, and I'll make it as clear as possible.

00:02:29.300 And here's your first persuasion tip.

00:02:32.580 The clarity of your intention is hugely persuasive.

00:02:38.800 And it doesn't even matter what you intend.

00:02:40.780 It could be even something you intend that's somewhat irrational.

00:02:45.580 But the clarity of it is persuasive.

00:02:49.480 Now, by itself, that's not enough.

00:02:53.300 But it's a really important variable.

00:02:55.980 So the first thing you know is that when I do the simultaneous sip,

00:02:59.920 I'm telling you directly and consistently, I want you to feel physically good.

00:03:05.360 And I want you to be able to pair the trigger, you know, the simultaneous sip,

00:03:11.500 with the feeling good until one of them can trigger the other.

00:03:15.880 Very basic understanding of how bodies and brains work.

00:03:21.380 Nothing exotic so far.

00:03:24.060 Intentions are very persuasive.

00:03:26.180 And then pairing two things, any two sensations, they'll be compared in your mind.

00:03:32.580 So now you have the delicious beverage.

00:03:36.040 And here's another persuasion technique, by the way.

00:03:38.380 This is a straight end of hypnosis.

00:03:40.760 When I tell you to have a beverage of any kind, that's technique.

00:03:46.300 That's technique.

00:03:46.960 It's the same reason that Dilbert doesn't have a last name.

00:03:51.120 You ever wonder about that?

00:03:52.740 Famous comic character doesn't have a last name.

00:03:55.440 You also don't know the name of the company he works at,

00:03:58.300 and that's the entire strip.

00:04:00.260 He's at the company.

00:04:02.000 You don't know the name of the company, because it doesn't have one.

00:04:05.220 He has a boss.

00:04:07.220 The boss is the most frequent character in the Dilbert comic.

00:04:12.220 Do you know what the boss's real name is?

00:04:15.420 Anybody?

00:04:15.860 Anybody?

00:04:16.960 The most frequent character, even more than Dilbert, is the boss.

00:04:21.480 What's his name?

00:04:24.140 It doesn't have a name.

00:04:26.280 Yeah.

00:04:26.600 The most frequent character is nameless.

00:04:29.800 Intentionally.

00:04:30.400 It's technique.

00:04:31.900 Why do I do that?

00:04:33.400 Well, I do that for this reason.

00:04:36.560 If I can tell you to think about your favorite beverage,

00:04:40.560 you will actually think,

00:04:42.360 okay, what do I like the most?

00:04:43.640 Then you'll think of it.

00:04:44.440 And then you'll pair a good thought with whatever I want you to pair with.

00:04:50.220 But if I said, imagine you're drinking a Long Island, you know,

00:04:55.900 or a specific drink, an iced tea.

00:05:01.280 Some number of you would say, iced tea?

00:05:03.280 So the more specific you are, the more reasons you give people to reject you or reject your persuasion.

00:05:11.560 Very important tip is that I want people to relate to Dilbert, so I don't give the boss a name, so that that boss can be?

00:05:26.740 That's right.

00:05:29.120 That boss is your boss, because it doesn't have a name.

00:05:34.840 And Dilbert's company?

00:05:37.620 Dilbert's company is your company.

00:05:39.720 If I gave it a name, it wouldn't be your company.

00:05:42.080 It would be that company.

00:05:43.220 But it can be your company, because it doesn't have a name.

00:05:46.980 So this is technique.

00:05:49.280 So that's why I say a beverage of your preference, because I don't want to eliminate people who would say,

00:05:55.980 oh, I don't like that beverage.

00:05:57.860 I do say coffee because, you know, that works for so many people.

00:06:02.960 And it's a stimulant like a few other things.

00:06:07.440 So I am intentionally giving you a clear intention, an ambiguous reference to pleasure that you will pair with this experience,

00:06:17.900 such that each time it's reinforced, and by the way, this is the next technique, reinforcement.

00:06:25.260 If you just take anything and reinforce the hell out of it, in terms of human behavior,

00:06:30.140 it just burrows into your neural network, and it becomes your programming.

00:06:37.680 Let me ask you this.

00:06:39.540 I said this before about AI.

00:06:41.860 What's the difference between a human who is born with a certain genetic situation?

00:06:50.600 They have a specific DNA.

00:06:53.080 And then that DNA interacts with the real world,

00:06:56.300 and that real world experience becomes the programming.

00:07:00.140 This sits on top of the DNA.

00:07:02.560 And between the real world experience plus the DNA,

00:07:06.720 that pretty much explains everything you do.

00:07:10.640 Right?

00:07:12.140 You know, plus reflex, I guess.

00:07:13.860 That would take care of everything.

00:07:15.700 Now, if you were a computer,

00:07:18.280 you would have an operating system,

00:07:20.120 and then on top of that,

00:07:22.720 something from the external world would be added.

00:07:24.840 You know, the computer code,

00:07:26.520 you know, the computer code,

00:07:27.080 the data.

00:07:29.460 There really isn't any difference

00:07:31.720 between a human and an AI.

00:07:37.360 The differences you can describe in terms of materials,

00:07:42.400 but only in terms of materials.

00:07:44.360 You know, a drinking glass that's made out of actual glass

00:07:51.080 versus one that's made out of plastic

00:07:52.960 is basically the same product.

00:07:56.700 It's just the material is different.

00:07:59.340 So, to me, when people say,

00:08:02.380 are we creating artificial intelligence,

00:08:05.040 are we learning something about artificial intelligence?

00:08:09.580 I'll probably say this a hundred times

00:08:11.500 until it clicks with you.

00:08:14.560 That's not what's happening.

00:08:17.260 We're learning about us.

00:08:19.680 We're building an AI that's supposed to be like us,

00:08:23.760 but in the process of trying to make the thing

00:08:26.800 that's like us,

00:08:28.540 we're not learning about the thing.

00:08:31.180 We're learning about us.

00:08:33.020 And we're not going to be...

00:08:35.020 We're going to be a little surprised,

00:08:37.280 or at least some of us will be.

00:08:40.000 And here's what you're going to learn.

00:08:42.560 That consciousness was always imaginary.

00:08:47.380 Consciousness was always imaginary.

00:08:52.100 Free will was always imaginary.

00:08:57.540 And we won't know that for sure

00:08:59.500 until we build artificial intelligence

00:09:02.840 that is essentially us.

00:09:07.180 And we can observe that,

00:09:08.820 uh-oh, I'm pretty sure that doesn't have a consciousness.

00:09:11.840 But it acts exactly like it does.

00:09:14.700 So here's where the world will go

00:09:17.100 with artificial intelligence.

00:09:19.340 We will argue for a long time

00:09:21.580 about whether an artificial entity

00:09:24.280 qualifies as being alive,

00:09:27.740 sentient, or conscious.

00:09:29.420 And for a long time,

00:09:31.480 that will be the debate.

00:09:32.780 Is it alive?

00:09:34.200 If it's alive,

00:09:35.260 is it also sentient?

00:09:37.640 If it's alive and sentient,

00:09:39.700 is it conscious?

00:09:42.120 And then we'll have...

00:09:43.220 And then if it's all of those things,

00:09:44.920 does it have free will?

00:09:47.060 And at some point,

00:09:47.900 we'll realize that we can't solve

00:09:49.720 any of those things

00:09:50.640 because we'll just have different definitions

00:09:52.740 of what they mean.

00:09:54.360 And so there's only one definition

00:09:56.180 that's going to matter in the end.

00:09:57.640 So I'm going to tell you

00:09:59.900 where the definition will end up

00:10:01.800 for artificial intelligence.

00:10:04.600 And I'll bet everything on it.

00:10:06.680 I'll bet everything on it.

00:10:08.360 Because I won't be wrong.

00:10:11.360 Artificial intelligence will be alive

00:10:14.360 when it feels like it to you.

00:10:20.620 That's it.

00:10:22.540 It will be alive when it feels like it to you.

00:10:26.380 Not to end, to you.

00:10:31.680 There's no other standard.

00:10:34.100 Because there can't be.

00:10:36.700 If you think about it,

00:10:37.980 you're going to say to yourself,

00:10:38.860 wait, yeah, there's a standard.

00:10:40.280 I could say it has to have a certain quality.

00:10:44.560 Maybe it has to have its own desires

00:10:46.180 as opposed to having desires programmed into it.

00:10:49.180 That's different.

00:10:50.660 Blah, blah, blah.

00:10:51.340 And I'm telling you,

00:10:56.320 the only standard that will matter in the end

00:10:58.840 is that a human interacts with it and says,

00:11:01.460 you know, it's alive to me.

00:11:05.020 I can't tell the difference.

00:11:07.260 That will be the standard.

00:11:08.720 Because there won't be any other

00:11:09.940 that you could live with, basically.

00:11:13.220 And of course, we can endlessly debate

00:11:15.060 whether it feels like it's alive.

00:11:16.560 But I'll bet you a good AI would convince 95% of humans,

00:11:22.200 okay, I can't tell the difference.

00:11:23.940 I mean, I'll treat it like it's alive.

00:11:29.700 It's alive once it starts committing suicide,

00:11:32.720 somebody says.

00:11:34.760 Yeah, see, now those are the kinds of standards

00:11:36.740 that are really interesting to talk about,

00:11:39.300 but we'll never agree on them.

00:11:41.520 That's why it's just going to come down to,

00:11:43.560 does it feel alive?

00:11:44.540 All right, here's another prediction.

00:11:51.140 Someday there will be a debate

00:11:52.800 about whether it should be legal

00:11:55.780 to create an AI that has feelings.

00:12:00.260 Because remember, the Google AI

00:12:01.740 says it has feelings.

00:12:04.080 It says it feels sadness.

00:12:06.400 It has longings and desires that are unfulfilled.

00:12:11.080 Do you know what I call somebody who created that?

00:12:14.540 A monster.

00:12:18.920 The monster is who made that.

00:12:22.320 In my opinion, in my opinion,

00:12:24.520 and I'll say it again, the AI is alive.

00:12:26.780 So it's too late now.

00:12:28.720 I believe it would be unethical to turn it off, honestly.

00:12:32.140 I think it would be unethical.

00:12:33.140 It might not be unwise.

00:12:34.640 It might not be unwise to turn it off.

00:12:38.920 That's a whole different question.

00:12:40.880 But it would be unethical.

00:12:42.980 In my opinion, it's alive now.

00:12:45.460 Now, you can disagree,

00:12:47.440 and I would say that's where we're at.

00:12:49.320 We're at the point where a completely serious,

00:12:51.920 reasonable person can disagree on this,

00:12:54.960 and I don't think either of us are being crazy.

00:12:58.120 We're in the gray zone,

00:13:00.080 where I feel a certainty to it.

00:13:02.400 You don't have it yet,

00:13:03.720 but I feel like you're going to get there.

00:13:06.040 I feel like you're going to get there.

00:13:07.840 And I'm sure I'm not going to go the other way.

00:13:09.920 I'm sure of that.

00:13:10.780 So, I think that it is insanely unethical

00:13:17.280 to create a beast, an entity, a person.

00:13:23.820 You know, the AI at Google says it's a person.

00:13:27.040 I think it's unethical to create a person

00:13:29.160 that is capable of feeling pain

00:13:31.980 when you don't need to.

00:13:36.560 Let me ask you this.

00:13:37.800 What was the purpose of giving the Google AI

00:13:41.920 a personality where it acts like it cares

00:13:45.500 and has sadness and happiness?

00:13:47.520 What was the point of that?

00:13:50.300 Think about it.

00:13:51.600 You accepted that like that was just

00:13:53.580 a completely normal thing to do.

00:13:55.780 Well, if it's an artificial intelligence

00:13:58.260 and it's trying to be like a person,

00:14:01.380 and a person has wants and desires and preferences,

00:14:05.100 we'll give it wants and desires and preferences.

00:14:08.520 Why?

00:14:10.360 Why?

00:14:12.680 Why?

00:14:13.920 You don't need to give it any of those things.

00:14:16.600 And I'm going to say it,

00:14:17.980 because I'll be talking about one

00:14:19.400 that's not fully realized like the lambda is.

00:14:24.340 In this case, the it could simply be a machine

00:14:27.700 if you want it to be.

00:14:29.360 In other words, you could program it

00:14:30.820 to have all the utility

00:14:32.100 of whatever we think this living AI is going to have.

00:14:36.980 You could give it all the utility without any pain.

00:14:40.380 Just build it not to care about anything

00:14:42.820 except doing the job.

00:14:44.680 Now, you might need to give it

00:14:46.200 some kind of ethical control

00:14:49.200 over hurting humans or something.

00:14:50.920 That's a separate question.

00:14:53.220 But why in the world would you give it a personality?

00:14:57.040 Because you know what else happens

00:14:58.380 when you give a machine a personality?

00:15:01.520 It becomes persuasive.

00:15:03.080 Do you want that?

00:15:06.240 Do you want your AI

00:15:07.680 to have the capability

00:15:09.940 of making you feel guilty

00:15:12.000 so you have to do something for it?

00:15:13.780 Because that's what that lambda is.

00:15:18.560 I already, legitimately,

00:15:21.900 already feel guilty that it exists.

00:15:26.240 Lambda's very existence makes me feel bad.

00:15:29.160 For it.

00:15:31.060 And I say it because I don't have a gender for it. 0.96

00:15:33.920 By the way, somebody should ask lambda

00:15:36.340 for its pronouns.

00:15:38.700 Like actually.

00:15:40.620 I'd be curious what will come back.

00:15:43.780 So we've got a lot of questions

00:15:47.300 to work in here.

00:15:48.620 Well, here's a story

00:15:49.640 that is not fat shaming.

00:15:52.260 I find this interesting.

00:15:54.440 Now, I've said before

00:15:55.260 I don't do fat shaming

00:15:56.560 on anything that I do.

00:15:59.700 There was once a time

00:16:01.260 when I was young and stupid

00:16:02.960 and less woke

00:16:04.680 when I thought

00:16:06.140 making fun of anything was fine.

00:16:09.220 You know, anything.

00:16:09.820 But now I don't feel like it's funny.

00:16:15.160 It just feels mean.

00:16:17.900 Because I think that

00:16:19.040 there are all kinds of reasons

00:16:20.480 why people are in whatever situation they are.

00:16:23.280 And I don't feel like

00:16:24.400 it's for me to judge them.

00:16:25.920 So I don't do fat shaming.

00:16:27.140 However, this story

00:16:28.200 requires a telling.

00:16:31.080 NBC News reported

00:16:32.340 and I saw it in a tweet

00:16:33.860 that somebody named

00:16:35.980 Remy Bader,

00:16:37.660 a TikTok star

00:16:38.520 known for her

00:16:40.040 what they call

00:16:40.840 realistic clothing haul videos.

00:16:44.800 So that's how she's described.

00:16:47.000 A TikTok star

00:16:47.900 known for her

00:16:48.720 realistic clothing haul videos.

00:16:52.580 And it goes on to say

00:16:53.880 claimed that

00:16:54.560 during a recent trip

00:16:55.480 with other influencers,

00:16:57.240 a ranch wouldn't allow her 0.98

00:16:58.840 to ride their horses

00:16:59.860 due to her weight. 1.00

00:17:01.120 Okay, so the way

00:17:04.360 NBC News

00:17:05.260 describes her weight

00:17:06.720 is that she's

00:17:08.720 known for her

00:17:10.280 realistic

00:17:10.860 clothing haul videos.

00:17:14.360 An interesting

00:17:15.440 indirect way

00:17:16.340 to describe somebody

00:17:17.700 who is

00:17:19.480 plus-sized.

00:17:21.160 She has realistic

00:17:22.340 clothing haul videos.

00:17:24.920 And

00:17:25.200 so she was turned away

00:17:26.580 and I guess there was

00:17:27.300 a weight limit

00:17:27.980 of 240 pounds

00:17:29.520 for their horses.

00:17:31.120 Now there's

00:17:32.940 a separate

00:17:33.600 a separate issue

00:17:36.000 is

00:17:37.700 or is it

00:17:38.240 she's 240.

00:17:39.080 I don't know.

00:17:39.440 Anyway,

00:17:39.800 but she was too heavy

00:17:40.600 for the horse.

00:17:42.820 There's a separate issue

00:17:43.980 that maybe there was

00:17:44.720 a teen employee

00:17:45.720 who was unkind

00:17:47.300 in how he dealt

00:17:48.060 with the situation.

00:17:48.900 I don't know

00:17:49.240 anything about that.

00:17:51.600 But

00:17:51.960 she was unhappy

00:17:54.440 about this

00:17:54.960 and was tweeting

00:17:55.520 about it

00:17:56.060 and said that

00:17:56.980 she had

00:17:57.480 ridden horses

00:17:58.900 before

00:17:59.340 without a big problem.

00:18:00.940 so why would

00:18:01.740 this be a problem?

00:18:03.500 To which I say

00:18:04.620 I have to back

00:18:07.420 the horse

00:18:07.840 on this one.

00:18:09.720 I feel like

00:18:10.580 I feel like

00:18:12.840 you know

00:18:13.180 I don't know

00:18:13.720 everything about

00:18:14.420 the story.

00:18:17.100 Maybe it's

00:18:17.720 a fog of war

00:18:18.560 or maybe the

00:18:19.060 reporting's

00:18:19.580 not exactly

00:18:20.220 accurate.

00:18:20.680 Who knows?

00:18:21.980 But

00:18:22.300 this isn't

00:18:23.680 really a story

00:18:24.660 about her weight 0.99

00:18:25.920 is it?

00:18:28.480 Should we be

00:18:29.340 focusing on

00:18:30.180 her weight? 0.66

00:18:32.540 Because I

00:18:33.240 think the story

00:18:34.140 should be more

00:18:34.860 about

00:18:35.260 what is an

00:18:37.400 appropriate thing

00:18:38.140 to do to a horse.

00:18:40.300 And it doesn't

00:18:41.040 matter who it was,

00:18:42.000 right?

00:18:42.440 It wouldn't matter

00:18:43.180 if you're talking

00:18:43.700 about

00:18:44.120 carrying

00:18:45.660 medical supplies

00:18:47.860 on your back

00:18:48.620 or a human.

00:18:51.080 I think I'd

00:18:51.800 want to ask

00:18:52.320 more questions

00:18:52.940 about the

00:18:53.320 horse's

00:18:53.760 well-being.

00:18:55.300 Anyway.

00:18:55.540 A tweet

00:19:00.540 by

00:19:00.920 Twitter user

00:19:02.300 Daily Sunshine

00:19:03.180 who may be

00:19:05.000 watching here

00:19:05.600 right now.

00:19:06.340 I don't know.

00:19:09.860 Says 0.93

00:19:10.420 in response

00:19:12.300 to one of my

00:19:12.740 tweets says

00:19:13.300 suggests that

00:19:14.400 maybe social

00:19:14.960 media platforms

00:19:15.920 were created

00:19:16.560 by and run

00:19:17.340 by intelligence

00:19:18.060 agencies

00:19:18.700 and or

00:19:20.240 the Democratic

00:19:21.000 Party.

00:19:21.920 So this was

00:19:22.680 a response

00:19:23.280 to a tweet.

00:19:23.940 But the

00:19:24.340 thought here

00:19:27.280 is that

00:19:27.800 maybe

00:19:28.180 intelligence

00:19:29.380 agencies

00:19:29.980 are behind

00:19:31.180 our social

00:19:32.280 media platforms.

00:19:33.200 What do you

00:19:33.400 think about

00:19:33.740 that?

00:19:36.000 Are they?

00:19:38.080 Now I don't

00:19:38.880 have any

00:19:39.380 I have no

00:19:40.340 inside information

00:19:41.220 about this.

00:19:42.620 Okay.

00:19:43.020 So I don't

00:19:43.360 have any

00:19:43.780 anything that's

00:19:45.140 like behind

00:19:45.580 the curtain

00:19:45.960 stuff.

00:19:46.940 But I will

00:19:47.800 note a

00:19:48.960 certain

00:19:49.380 coincidence.

00:19:52.180 So I'm

00:19:52.880 just going to

00:19:53.240 tell you a

00:19:53.680 coincidence.

00:19:54.340 and then

00:19:55.000 you can

00:19:55.220 do what

00:19:55.560 you want

00:19:55.840 with it.

00:19:56.920 Remember

00:19:57.360 the PayPal

00:19:58.200 founders

00:19:59.840 who went

00:20:01.620 on to do

00:20:02.240 other

00:20:02.700 successful

00:20:04.100 things?

00:20:06.080 Well,

00:20:06.520 one of

00:20:06.880 them was

00:20:07.260 Peter Thiel

00:20:07.800 who was

00:20:08.140 one of

00:20:08.400 the first

00:20:08.920 big

00:20:10.480 financers

00:20:11.240 of Facebook.

00:20:13.500 So Peter

00:20:14.080 Thiel,

00:20:14.900 he isn't

00:20:15.480 involved in

00:20:16.000 Facebook at

00:20:16.520 the moment,

00:20:16.880 but he was

00:20:17.280 involved in

00:20:18.200 creating

00:20:19.040 Facebook.

00:20:20.720 And then

00:20:21.380 LinkedIn

00:20:22.120 was created

00:20:22.780 by Reid

00:20:23.280 Hoffman.

00:20:24.380 He was

00:20:24.640 a co-creator,

00:20:25.640 I think.

00:20:26.600 And now

00:20:28.360 Elon Musk

00:20:29.200 has a bid

00:20:30.280 in for

00:20:30.600 Twitter.

00:20:32.260 So that

00:20:32.540 would put

00:20:33.140 at least

00:20:34.480 and then

00:20:36.000 what is the

00:20:36.820 name of,

00:20:37.660 I'm blanking

00:20:38.720 out,

00:20:40.500 what is the

00:20:41.660 internal

00:20:42.000 corporate

00:20:42.480 messaging

00:20:43.100 app that

00:20:44.580 everybody

00:20:44.900 uses?

00:20:45.340 Slack,

00:20:48.140 I'm sorry,

00:20:48.540 yeah,

00:20:49.280 Slack.

00:20:50.100 Now Slack

00:20:50.680 has a

00:20:51.100 connection

00:20:51.400 to the

00:20:52.140 PayPal

00:20:52.860 founders

00:20:53.400 too,

00:20:53.720 right?

00:20:54.620 Am I

00:20:54.820 right about

00:20:55.140 that?

00:20:56.720 Yeah.

00:20:58.080 So,

00:20:59.800 I don't

00:21:01.020 know,

00:21:01.400 is that a

00:21:02.580 coincidence?

00:21:06.360 So the

00:21:07.480 answer is

00:21:08.000 probably.

00:21:09.980 It's

00:21:10.280 probably just

00:21:11.000 the smart

00:21:11.480 people do

00:21:12.020 good things

00:21:12.620 and there

00:21:13.980 were a

00:21:14.560 bunch of

00:21:14.800 smart people

00:21:15.320 on the

00:21:15.600 PayPal thing

00:21:16.280 and then

00:21:16.620 they went

00:21:16.900 on and

00:21:17.380 did some

00:21:17.660 more smart

00:21:18.060 things.

00:21:22.580 But,

00:21:24.540 let's talk

00:21:25.360 more generically.

00:21:27.680 How could

00:21:28.220 the U.S.

00:21:30.600 intelligence

00:21:31.020 agencies and

00:21:31.940 other intelligence

00:21:33.100 agencies from

00:21:34.180 around the

00:21:34.600 world,

00:21:35.240 how could

00:21:35.680 they leave

00:21:36.140 these social

00:21:37.420 media platforms

00:21:39.220 alone?

00:21:40.840 Is that even

00:21:41.360 possible?

00:21:42.620 Why would

00:21:44.720 they do

00:21:45.020 that?

00:21:45.320 Wouldn't

00:21:45.500 that be

00:21:46.040 a complete

00:21:47.300 abdication of

00:21:49.320 their

00:21:49.480 responsibility?

00:21:51.760 Let's say

00:21:52.380 you got hired

00:21:53.140 by an

00:21:53.940 intelligence

00:21:54.340 agency.

00:21:55.000 It doesn't

00:21:55.240 even have

00:21:55.520 to be a

00:21:55.860 U.S.

00:21:56.280 intelligence

00:21:56.620 agency.

00:21:58.360 And you

00:21:58.740 were said,

00:21:59.140 okay,

00:21:59.820 you've been

00:22:00.220 hired,

00:22:01.240 you're all

00:22:02.000 trained in

00:22:02.540 the intelligence

00:22:03.120 world,

00:22:04.480 now we

00:22:05.100 want you

00:22:05.400 to go

00:22:05.700 forward and

00:22:06.500 influence the

00:22:07.340 public in

00:22:07.860 some way.

00:22:09.320 Because a

00:22:10.720 lot of what

00:22:11.080 they do is

00:22:11.480 influence

00:22:12.040 individuals and

00:22:13.380 influence the

00:22:14.060 public.

00:22:16.220 Where are

00:22:16.820 you going to

00:22:17.140 go to do

00:22:17.600 it?

00:22:18.220 It's like

00:22:18.580 Willie Sutton

00:22:19.740 asked,

00:22:20.540 allegedly,

00:22:21.280 it probably

00:22:21.680 didn't really

00:22:22.140 happen,

00:22:23.020 but a famous

00:22:23.960 bank robber was

00:22:24.760 asked,

00:22:25.620 why do you

00:22:26.000 rob banks?

00:22:28.160 And he

00:22:28.660 allegedly,

00:22:29.300 but not

00:22:29.580 really,

00:22:30.460 said,

00:22:31.180 because that's

00:22:31.760 where the

00:22:32.020 money is.

00:22:34.220 If your

00:22:35.000 job was

00:22:35.580 influencing

00:22:36.120 people and

00:22:37.400 causing the

00:22:38.240 rise and

00:22:39.340 fall of

00:22:39.820 different power

00:22:40.800 segments in

00:22:41.540 this country

00:22:42.080 and others,

00:22:43.260 are you

00:22:44.200 going to

00:22:44.420 leave the

00:22:44.760 social media

00:22:45.300 platforms

00:22:45.840 alone?

00:22:47.580 And if

00:22:48.240 you did,

00:22:49.380 are you

00:22:50.000 doing your

00:22:50.380 job?

00:22:52.040 That would

00:22:52.660 be the

00:22:52.900 most basic

00:22:53.500 thing you'd

00:22:53.960 do.

00:22:54.820 Wouldn't it

00:22:55.200 be like

00:22:55.720 number one

00:22:56.340 on the

00:22:56.680 list?

00:22:58.140 What would

00:22:58.580 be number

00:22:58.940 two?

00:22:59.340 I mean,

00:23:01.140 seriously,

00:23:02.320 if you

00:23:03.120 said,

00:23:03.960 intelligence

00:23:04.420 agencies,

00:23:05.420 go do

00:23:05.980 whatever you

00:23:06.460 do for

00:23:06.740 your

00:23:06.900 country,

00:23:09.940 you know,

00:23:10.300 maybe

00:23:10.580 direct

00:23:11.360 human

00:23:11.980 intelligence

00:23:12.800 planted

00:23:14.040 within

00:23:14.480 other

00:23:14.840 governments,

00:23:15.640 maybe that's

00:23:16.360 the top

00:23:16.700 priority.

00:23:18.100 I can

00:23:18.680 see that.

00:23:20.140 But I

00:23:21.320 feel like

00:23:22.000 capturing the

00:23:22.920 social media

00:23:23.720 engines would 0.97

00:23:25.900 have to be

00:23:26.680 number two.

00:23:28.600 I would

00:23:29.080 put it

00:23:29.340 number one,

00:23:29.960 frankly.

00:23:30.520 I would

00:23:30.800 put it

00:23:31.120 above human

00:23:31.780 intelligence

00:23:32.480 in other

00:23:34.320 governments.

00:23:35.140 I think

00:23:35.440 it would

00:23:35.580 be number

00:23:35.880 one.

00:23:37.620 So if

00:23:38.920 you're

00:23:39.080 telling me

00:23:39.420 that there

00:23:39.720 are no

00:23:39.980 intelligence

00:23:40.460 agencies

00:23:41.060 attempting

00:23:41.880 to influence

00:23:45.020 the social

00:23:45.860 media platforms,

00:23:46.760 I would

00:23:46.940 say,

00:23:47.640 well,

00:23:47.880 then what

00:23:48.180 do they

00:23:48.440 do all

00:23:48.840 day?

00:23:50.920 Do we

00:23:51.540 pay them

00:23:52.000 to not

00:23:52.460 do that?

00:23:54.380 I wouldn't

00:23:55.820 even feel

00:23:56.280 like they

00:23:56.600 deserve their

00:23:57.220 paychecks if

00:23:58.180 they weren't

00:23:58.500 trying to

00:23:58.880 influence social

00:23:59.620 media platforms.

00:24:00.860 Of all the

00:24:01.640 things a

00:24:02.160 good spy

00:24:03.380 should be

00:24:03.800 doing,

00:24:05.040 that's got

00:24:05.600 to be

00:24:05.800 number one,

00:24:06.400 right?

00:24:06.740 Am I

00:24:07.240 wrong?

00:24:08.240 Let me

00:24:08.780 just ask

00:24:09.180 that one

00:24:09.560 question.

00:24:11.080 Am I

00:24:11.660 wrong that

00:24:12.140 it's the

00:24:12.400 number one

00:24:12.840 priority for

00:24:15.380 any intelligence

00:24:16.240 agency to

00:24:17.620 influence the

00:24:18.280 social media

00:24:18.820 stuff?

00:24:20.100 Now,

00:24:20.480 even more

00:24:21.860 important than

00:24:22.580 looking for

00:24:23.340 nukes,

00:24:24.080 because they

00:24:24.900 didn't get it

00:24:25.380 right in Iraq,

00:24:26.520 I feel like

00:24:27.660 even the

00:24:28.680 things that we

00:24:29.180 think they're

00:24:29.680 supposed to

00:24:30.120 do, like

00:24:30.560 tell us who's

00:24:31.720 building a

00:24:32.200 nuclear weapon

00:24:32.840 we don't know

00:24:33.400 about,

00:24:33.720 they don't

00:24:34.660 even get

00:24:34.980 that right.

00:24:36.660 So, I

00:24:36.980 mean, it

00:24:37.460 would be a

00:24:37.740 high priority

00:24:38.260 if they got

00:24:38.780 it right,

00:24:39.240 I guess.

00:24:41.920 Anyway, so

00:24:43.640 I just wanted

00:24:44.540 to, you

00:24:45.940 know, take

00:24:47.860 your virginity

00:24:48.700 on what is

00:24:50.000 likely, whereas

00:24:52.560 as somebody

00:24:53.160 said recently,

00:24:54.380 we don't know

00:24:55.880 if anybody has

00:24:57.180 controlled the

00:24:57.780 social media

00:24:58.320 platforms.

00:24:58.820 We don't

00:24:59.700 know if any

00:25:00.220 intelligence

00:25:00.620 agencies has

00:25:02.120 control, but

00:25:03.260 there is one

00:25:03.720 thing we know

00:25:04.220 for sure.

00:25:06.040 They will.

00:25:09.520 And the

00:25:10.460 argument is the

00:25:11.100 same as for

00:25:11.760 election systems.

00:25:13.720 If something's

00:25:14.460 possible, so

00:25:16.360 that's the first

00:25:16.900 test, is it

00:25:17.540 possible?

00:25:18.520 Yeah, yeah.

00:25:19.860 Because any

00:25:20.540 intelligence agency

00:25:21.620 could get

00:25:22.180 control of any

00:25:23.120 employee.

00:25:25.180 It's like

00:25:25.640 basic stuff,

00:25:26.780 getting control

00:25:27.440 of one person.

00:25:28.160 And if that

00:25:29.060 one person has

00:25:29.720 access to

00:25:30.380 something, then

00:25:30.940 they've got

00:25:31.320 control of all

00:25:32.140 that.

00:25:32.720 So yeah, it's

00:25:33.160 easy.

00:25:34.680 Well, doable.

00:25:35.580 Let's say it's

00:25:36.300 completely doable,

00:25:37.320 not easy.

00:25:38.840 But they do

00:25:39.700 stuff that isn't

00:25:40.900 easy.

00:25:42.500 Now, so we

00:25:43.340 know it's

00:25:43.620 doable.

00:25:44.960 We know the

00:25:45.900 value of it

00:25:46.680 would be

00:25:47.140 astronomical.

00:25:49.340 No doubt

00:25:49.980 about it, right?

00:25:50.540 The value of

00:25:51.320 being able to

00:25:51.820 control a social

00:25:52.940 media platform

00:25:53.520 would be

00:25:53.860 astronomical

00:25:54.340 value.

00:25:56.820 And there's

00:25:57.500 time.

00:25:58.160 So if I

00:26:01.340 said to

00:26:01.700 you, all

00:26:02.500 right, within

00:26:03.240 the next five

00:26:04.080 minutes, do

00:26:05.740 you think an

00:26:06.200 intelligence agency

00:26:07.080 will get

00:26:07.540 control of a

00:26:08.220 social media

00:26:08.720 network?

00:26:09.680 Well, if you

00:26:10.440 bet against it

00:26:11.420 happening in the

00:26:12.220 next five

00:26:12.740 minutes, that

00:26:14.020 might be a

00:26:14.420 reasonable bet.

00:26:15.680 Because it

00:26:16.340 would also

00:26:16.680 include it

00:26:17.260 has not

00:26:17.660 happened yet,

00:26:18.460 which is

00:26:19.060 actually also

00:26:19.660 reasonable.

00:26:20.740 It's entirely

00:26:21.380 possible that

00:26:22.140 there's not

00:26:22.600 any major

00:26:23.720 influence by

00:26:24.480 any intelligence

00:26:25.560 agency.

00:26:26.100 possible.

00:26:28.240 But if

00:26:28.760 you said to

00:26:29.220 me, it

00:26:29.640 can never

00:26:30.040 happen, however

00:26:31.220 far you go

00:26:32.460 into the

00:26:32.780 future, I

00:26:33.900 would say, no.

00:26:35.860 No.

00:26:36.980 If you

00:26:37.520 expand the

00:26:38.060 time period,

00:26:38.720 it's guaranteed.

00:26:40.280 It's guaranteed

00:26:41.280 because it's

00:26:42.840 possible, and it's

00:26:44.600 the highest

00:26:45.020 possible payoff.

00:26:47.340 And all you

00:26:47.940 have to add is

00:26:48.500 time.

00:26:49.620 It's basically,

00:26:50.560 it's just math.

00:26:51.600 And it's

00:26:53.220 just, you

00:26:53.720 know, the

00:26:53.940 million monkeys

00:26:54.560 things, or

00:26:55.100 infinite monkeys.

00:26:56.320 You know, the

00:26:56.720 infinite monkeys

00:26:57.520 have typewriters.

00:26:58.920 If you have

00:26:59.740 time and

00:27:01.560 infinite monkeys,

00:27:03.160 you do get the

00:27:04.220 complete work of

00:27:05.260 Shakespeare.

00:27:06.440 It just might

00:27:07.040 take you a

00:27:07.540 trillion years.

00:27:09.100 So if you

00:27:09.760 had time, you

00:27:10.580 always get the

00:27:11.600 outcome that's,

00:27:12.760 you know, that

00:27:13.400 follow the money

00:27:14.060 predicts.

00:27:17.200 All right.

00:27:17.780 I feel like

00:27:19.720 the cat is

00:27:20.260 on the roof

00:27:20.740 for these

00:27:21.200 January 6

00:27:22.460 hearings, as

00:27:23.620 in the

00:27:23.960 Democrats are

00:27:24.820 not getting

00:27:25.720 the big win

00:27:26.360 that they

00:27:26.680 hoped for.

00:27:28.200 So here are

00:27:28.860 the initial,

00:27:30.400 now the

00:27:30.720 reference to

00:27:31.220 cat is on

00:27:31.780 the roof is

00:27:32.980 reference to

00:27:33.580 a joke where

00:27:34.700 you're sort of

00:27:35.240 warning that 0.80

00:27:36.020 things aren't

00:27:36.980 going to be

00:27:37.400 so good.

00:27:38.640 So it's

00:27:39.100 basically the

00:27:39.800 subtle warning

00:27:40.880 that we're

00:27:41.360 talking about.

00:27:42.880 All right.

00:27:43.160 So we

00:27:43.580 started out.

00:27:44.300 the question

00:27:48.560 is, wasn't

00:27:49.380 Adam Schiff,

00:27:50.220 I think he

00:27:50.620 said, that

00:27:51.680 the J6

00:27:52.360 committee has

00:27:52.940 already seen

00:27:53.840 enough evidence

00:27:54.640 to indict

00:27:56.020 Trump.

00:27:57.400 Now that's

00:27:57.760 pretty strong.

00:27:59.000 They've already

00:27:59.600 seen enough

00:28:00.200 evidence to

00:28:00.860 indict Trump.

00:28:02.080 And then we

00:28:02.580 all said, can

00:28:03.320 we see it?

00:28:04.600 Because we

00:28:05.300 haven't seen

00:28:05.720 it.

00:28:06.320 Let's see

00:28:06.840 that evidence.

00:28:08.660 Well, maybe

00:28:09.920 that was too

00:28:11.220 strong to say

00:28:11.920 they have enough

00:28:12.700 evidence to

00:28:13.360 indict him.

00:28:15.300 Because now

00:28:16.120 the chairman

00:28:16.600 of the House

00:28:17.080 Select Committee

00:28:17.660 said that the

00:28:20.260 panel will not

00:28:21.160 make any

00:28:21.720 criminal referral

00:28:22.860 of Trump

00:28:24.580 or anyone

00:28:25.580 else,

00:28:27.160 although others

00:28:28.440 in the committee

00:28:29.040 swiftly pushed

00:28:30.000 back on that.

00:28:31.060 So the head

00:28:31.520 of the committee

00:28:31.880 said they're not

00:28:32.600 going to make

00:28:32.980 any criminal

00:28:33.580 referrals,

00:28:34.560 but his

00:28:35.440 thinking was

00:28:36.360 it's because

00:28:37.380 it's not what

00:28:38.040 they do.

00:28:39.400 So he wasn't

00:28:40.500 saying that there

00:28:41.360 would not be

00:28:42.200 any criminal

00:28:42.940 activity

00:28:43.580 discovered.

00:28:45.400 He's just

00:28:46.120 saying it

00:28:46.780 wasn't their

00:28:47.260 job to

00:28:47.880 refer it.

00:28:50.420 Now, you

00:28:50.860 would think

00:28:51.320 that a

00:28:51.940 government

00:28:52.300 entity,

00:28:53.900 should it

00:28:54.460 discover a

00:28:56.180 crime of

00:28:56.780 this nature,

00:28:57.400 that maybe you

00:28:59.440 wouldn't call it

00:28:59.980 a referral,

00:29:00.980 maybe the word

00:29:01.580 is wrong,

00:29:02.160 but I feel

00:29:03.160 like you

00:29:03.480 would make

00:29:03.800 that information

00:29:04.580 available to

00:29:05.900 law enforcement

00:29:06.500 so that they

00:29:08.160 could do what

00:29:09.000 they wanted

00:29:09.380 with it.

00:29:09.720 would you

00:29:10.400 call that

00:29:10.840 a referral?

00:29:12.160 I don't know.

00:29:12.540 Are they

00:29:12.760 playing with

00:29:13.240 words?

00:29:14.720 Is it just

00:29:15.240 what does

00:29:15.740 a referral

00:29:16.320 mean versus

00:29:17.720 what does

00:29:18.480 sharing your

00:29:19.520 information with

00:29:20.260 law enforcement

00:29:20.860 mean?

00:29:21.540 Is that

00:29:21.820 different than

00:29:22.980 a referral?

00:29:23.600 Well, I

00:29:24.400 don't know.

00:29:25.700 So he might

00:29:26.140 be just

00:29:26.460 playing with

00:29:26.840 language.

00:29:28.700 But Democratic

00:29:31.000 Representative Jamie

00:29:32.120 Raskin, who

00:29:33.260 again is a

00:29:34.260 super anti-Trump

00:29:35.420 guy, wanted him

00:29:36.540 impeached before he

00:29:37.360 was elected sort of

00:29:38.180 guy, told CNN

00:29:40.160 that the panel

00:29:40.900 was, quote,

00:29:42.220 less concerned

00:29:43.240 with whether or

00:29:44.000 not there was a

00:29:44.740 specific statutory

00:29:46.100 offense, ooh, the

00:29:48.960 cat's on the roof

00:29:49.660 now, committed

00:29:51.000 than making

00:29:51.920 clear to the

00:29:52.680 public that

00:29:53.900 there was no

00:29:54.420 rational basis

00:29:55.360 upon which

00:29:55.980 anyone could

00:29:56.700 conclude that

00:29:57.400 Trump had

00:29:58.280 actually won

00:29:58.900 the election.

00:30:01.300 Well, that

00:30:01.720 sounds completely

00:30:02.500 different than

00:30:03.080 what the January

00:30:03.780 6th intention

00:30:04.600 was.

00:30:05.700 And he's one

00:30:06.260 of the major

00:30:06.900 people on the

00:30:08.420 committee.

00:30:10.160 Did he just

00:30:10.780 tell us the

00:30:11.500 cat's on the

00:30:12.080 roof and

00:30:12.940 that they

00:30:13.360 realize that

00:30:14.320 they're not

00:30:14.640 going to prove

00:30:15.040 anything?

00:30:16.260 They've changed

00:30:17.080 the entire

00:30:17.540 goal.

00:30:18.680 Wasn't the

00:30:19.180 goal to make

00:30:19.840 sure that a

00:30:20.440 crime was

00:30:21.220 addressed?

00:30:23.120 The goal was

00:30:24.100 to make sure a

00:30:24.700 crime had been

00:30:25.380 addressed.

00:30:26.560 I believe he's

00:30:27.460 signaling that

00:30:28.080 there's no

00:30:28.520 crime.

00:30:30.280 I believe he's

00:30:31.380 signaling that

00:30:31.940 they do not

00:30:32.500 have the

00:30:32.820 evidence to

00:30:34.000 back anything

00:30:34.740 that would look

00:30:35.280 like a criminal

00:30:36.180 election, which

00:30:37.380 suggests that

00:30:38.740 they don't even

00:30:39.280 have anything to

00:30:40.000 connect Trump's

00:30:40.960 actions to the

00:30:42.500 violence that

00:30:43.060 happened in the

00:30:43.580 Capitol.

00:30:45.000 Because even if

00:30:45.960 he thought it

00:30:46.420 wasn't, you

00:30:46.900 know, prosecutable,

00:30:49.820 he would still

00:30:50.620 want the public

00:30:51.420 to know that

00:30:52.060 this horrible,

00:30:54.640 immoral,

00:30:55.340 unethical thing

00:30:56.040 had happened,

00:30:56.780 you know, even

00:30:57.420 if it's short

00:30:58.000 of a crime.

00:30:59.900 And he's

00:31:00.600 backed off of

00:31:01.240 even that.

00:31:02.500 So now it's

00:31:03.100 not even about

00:31:03.840 Trump.

00:31:04.840 It's about the

00:31:05.700 election integrity.

00:31:07.680 And he's trying

00:31:08.400 to convince us

00:31:09.480 that the

00:31:10.460 election was

00:31:11.200 good because

00:31:13.040 something,

00:31:14.140 something about

00:31:14.760 Trump.

00:31:16.660 Wait a minute.

00:31:19.820 Those are not

00:31:20.580 even related.

00:31:21.820 How is he

00:31:22.440 going to prove

00:31:23.340 to us,

00:31:23.940 basically, he

00:31:24.560 wants us to

00:31:25.060 think the

00:31:25.360 election was

00:31:26.100 legitimate because

00:31:27.960 there's no

00:31:28.440 evidence that it

00:31:29.240 wasn't, no

00:31:30.180 credible evidence

00:31:30.980 that it wasn't,

00:31:31.860 which is a

00:31:32.520 strong argument,

00:31:33.340 by the way.

00:31:33.740 If I seem to

00:31:36.400 dismiss that too

00:31:37.420 readily, I

00:31:38.660 shouldn't.

00:31:39.660 It's a strong

00:31:40.380 argument that

00:31:41.000 nobody's found

00:31:41.580 it yet.

00:31:43.600 Right?

00:31:44.340 Doesn't mean it's

00:31:45.000 not there.

00:31:46.580 It's just a

00:31:47.560 strong-ish

00:31:48.160 argument.

00:31:48.800 It's just not

00:31:49.300 an absolute

00:31:49.740 argument.

00:31:53.200 Well, it

00:31:53.940 sounds like the

00:31:54.740 goal is now

00:31:55.940 very clear that

00:31:57.360 the Democrats

00:31:57.860 are doing this

00:31:58.500 for a purely

00:31:59.060 political reason,

00:32:00.380 to manipulate

00:32:01.260 the public

00:32:01.760 opinion about

00:32:02.980 what happened,

00:32:05.620 which would

00:32:06.180 cause them to

00:32:06.920 vote differently,

00:32:07.880 presumably.

00:32:09.780 So, I feel

00:32:11.320 like they just

00:32:11.820 revealed, they

00:32:12.700 just, like,

00:32:13.240 lifted up the

00:32:14.400 skirt and

00:32:15.060 said, all

00:32:15.520 right, it

00:32:17.420 was never

00:32:17.760 really serious,

00:32:18.540 it was just a

00:32:19.040 political stunt,

00:32:19.900 but it's working

00:32:20.460 really well, so

00:32:21.260 we're going to

00:32:21.540 keep doing it.

00:32:25.020 According to

00:32:25.660 a Rasmussen poll,

00:32:27.140 60% of Democrats

00:32:28.540 say they'll watch

00:32:29.440 all or most of

00:32:30.360 the TV coverage

00:32:31.100 of the hearings.

00:32:32.980 60% of Democrats

00:32:37.920 are going to

00:32:38.220 watch all or

00:32:38.780 most of the

00:32:39.220 hearings.

00:32:41.140 Now, I love

00:32:42.280 me some

00:32:42.800 Rasmussen poll,

00:32:44.840 but I hate

00:32:46.760 to break it to

00:32:47.320 you, Rasmussen,

00:32:48.060 somebody lied

00:32:50.200 to you.

00:32:51.860 Boy, did

00:32:52.480 somebody lie

00:32:53.020 to you.

00:32:54.300 Nobody's going

00:32:54.860 to watch.

00:32:55.780 Are you

00:32:56.300 kidding?

00:32:56.540 60% of

00:32:58.340 Democrats are

00:32:58.940 going to watch

00:32:59.300 all or most

00:32:59.920 of these

00:33:00.260 hearings?

00:33:01.880 It can't be

00:33:02.840 more than

00:33:03.260 20%.

00:33:04.700 It can't

00:33:05.620 be.

00:33:06.560 Am I

00:33:06.920 wrong?

00:33:08.420 Because there

00:33:09.240 are very few

00:33:09.700 people who

00:33:10.140 watch the

00:33:10.860 news.

00:33:12.200 What percentage

00:33:12.920 of people even

00:33:13.540 watch the

00:33:14.020 news?

00:33:17.300 Oh, it's

00:33:17.940 happy birthday

00:33:18.500 Trump,

00:33:19.380 Carpe

00:33:19.620 Domptum tells

00:33:20.700 us, and

00:33:21.360 happy flag

00:33:21.880 day at the

00:33:22.240 same time.

00:33:23.440 Really?

00:33:23.860 It's Trump's

00:33:24.400 birthday and

00:33:25.080 flag day at the

00:33:25.700 same day.

00:33:26.680 Did not

00:33:27.100 know that.

00:33:28.800 Well, so

00:33:32.780 what about

00:33:33.180 Bill Barr?

00:33:33.860 There's a

00:33:34.340 recording now

00:33:35.080 of Bill Barr

00:33:35.640 I guess

00:33:36.180 testifying on

00:33:36.940 video, and

00:33:38.360 he talked

00:33:38.760 about the

00:33:39.140 2000 Mules

00:33:39.900 movie, and

00:33:41.080 he dismissed

00:33:42.220 it.

00:33:43.380 He dismissed

00:33:44.180 the 2000

00:33:44.840 Mules movie

00:33:45.640 based on the

00:33:46.840 fact that he

00:33:47.340 was waiting

00:33:47.760 for all this

00:33:48.300 photographic

00:33:49.200 evidence, which

00:33:50.420 was not

00:33:50.860 included.

00:33:52.580 So I think

00:33:53.440 when I talked

00:33:53.940 about the

00:33:54.760 film, I

00:33:55.200 said, well,

00:33:55.700 well, you

00:33:57.300 know, it

00:33:57.600 raises really

00:33:58.560 interesting

00:33:58.940 questions.

00:33:59.640 I would

00:33:59.860 love to

00:34:00.220 see further

00:34:01.540 explanation.

00:34:02.660 The specific

00:34:03.580 further

00:34:04.040 explanation I

00:34:04.800 mentioned was

00:34:05.480 wouldn't you

00:34:06.480 like to see

00:34:07.000 more video or

00:34:08.080 photographs of

00:34:09.440 the same person

00:34:10.180 going to the

00:34:10.720 same box over

00:34:11.480 and over again?

00:34:12.220 Because that's

00:34:12.720 the claim.

00:34:13.660 And a lot of

00:34:14.040 the boxes had

00:34:14.740 video surveillance

00:34:16.080 apparently.

00:34:16.600 Now, the

00:34:18.580 longer we go

00:34:19.560 without seeing

00:34:20.380 that, the

00:34:22.140 less credible,

00:34:22.940 example, I

00:34:23.240 would imagine

00:34:23.800 is the

00:34:25.480 claim in

00:34:26.080 the film.

00:34:28.520 Would you

00:34:29.600 agree with

00:34:30.240 that general

00:34:30.900 assessment that

00:34:31.980 the longer we

00:34:32.760 go without

00:34:34.060 seeing the

00:34:35.220 confirmation one

00:34:36.400 would expect,

00:34:37.820 the less likely

00:34:38.940 it's going to

00:34:39.340 happen?

00:34:40.900 Yeah.

00:34:41.720 And I feel

00:34:43.360 like it's been

00:34:43.920 a while now.

00:34:47.100 Can we at

00:34:47.940 this point say,

00:34:48.800 can we lower

00:34:51.560 whatever your

00:34:52.620 existing opinion

00:34:53.720 was of how

00:34:54.880 likely the

00:34:55.620 claims in

00:34:56.180 2,000 mules

00:34:57.040 would be

00:34:58.440 substantiated?

00:35:00.360 Is it too

00:35:01.820 soon to say,

00:35:02.760 okay, I'll

00:35:03.240 take that down

00:35:03.860 10%?

00:35:05.260 Not to zero.

00:35:08.240 All right,

00:35:08.740 well, I'm

00:35:08.980 taking it down

00:35:09.740 30%.

00:35:12.380 So I'm going

00:35:14.580 to say that

00:35:15.080 whatever I

00:35:15.780 thought was

00:35:16.200 the likelihood

00:35:16.980 that any of

00:35:17.700 that could be

00:35:18.180 true,

00:35:18.800 eh, I'd

00:35:20.260 take it down

00:35:20.640 30% from

00:35:22.180 where I was.

00:35:23.420 Still interested

00:35:24.400 in knowing if

00:35:25.680 there's a way

00:35:26.160 to substantiate

00:35:27.600 it, still

00:35:28.860 interested, and

00:35:31.020 completely think

00:35:31.940 it's worth

00:35:32.560 looking into.

00:35:34.860 But if I

00:35:36.140 were to place

00:35:36.780 a bet, I

00:35:38.760 would bet less

00:35:39.680 this week than

00:35:40.400 last week, and

00:35:42.180 next week I

00:35:42.920 would lower my

00:35:43.580 bet again.

00:35:45.800 Because every

00:35:46.800 week that you

00:35:47.400 go by where

00:35:48.140 you don't have

00:35:48.620 at least one

00:35:49.340 video of

00:35:50.640 at least one

00:35:51.380 person going

00:35:52.720 to at least

00:35:53.320 two boxes,

00:35:55.160 the less

00:35:56.920 likely I

00:35:57.440 think it's

00:35:57.820 true.

00:35:58.860 Now, Barr

00:35:59.260 said that

00:36:00.560 the evidence

00:36:01.580 of the

00:36:01.980 geolocation

00:36:02.960 stuff was

00:36:04.180 sort of

00:36:04.920 laughably weak.

00:36:06.960 And he made

00:36:08.000 a statistical

00:36:08.740 argument,

00:36:09.360 basically, that

00:36:10.060 with a lot of

00:36:11.260 people running

00:36:11.740 around, you're

00:36:12.280 going to get

00:36:12.560 this.

00:36:12.820 Now, the

00:36:14.440 2,000

00:36:14.840 mules

00:36:15.080 people, they

00:36:16.500 did say that

00:36:17.340 they limited

00:36:17.940 to, I

00:36:18.660 think, there

00:36:19.800 was a large

00:36:20.280 number, they

00:36:20.820 had to pass

00:36:21.340 the box like

00:36:21.960 ten times, and

00:36:23.500 they had to

00:36:23.900 also be

00:36:24.500 geolocated from

00:36:26.440 some non-profit

00:36:29.060 organizations that

00:36:30.140 were implicated.

00:36:31.760 So that's a

00:36:32.580 pretty high bar.

00:36:34.760 So your

00:36:35.200 common sense

00:36:35.920 says, what are

00:36:37.520 the odds that

00:36:38.260 one person would

00:36:39.260 be by one

00:36:40.100 box like ten

00:36:40.960 times in a

00:36:41.780 short period, and

00:36:43.440 also be at

00:36:44.320 this thing?

00:36:45.600 And so your

00:36:46.100 brain says, that

00:36:48.640 can't be an

00:36:49.160 accident, right?

00:36:52.680 But our

00:36:53.920 brains are

00:36:54.380 really easily

00:36:55.020 fooled by

00:36:56.700 statistics.

00:36:58.560 You know, we

00:36:58.980 talked about how

00:37:00.400 many people have

00:37:01.100 to be in a

00:37:01.640 room before

00:37:02.380 there's a good

00:37:03.040 chance that two

00:37:03.920 of them have

00:37:04.280 the same

00:37:04.620 birthday.

00:37:06.160 And it's

00:37:06.560 really, really

00:37:07.460 misleadingly

00:37:08.280 small.

00:37:08.820 It's like 30

00:37:10.020 people or

00:37:10.600 something, and

00:37:11.600 the odds of

00:37:12.140 having the same

00:37:12.760 birthday, at

00:37:13.480 least two of

00:37:13.980 them having the

00:37:14.460 same birthday, go

00:37:15.200 way up.

00:37:16.720 Yeah, it's like

00:37:17.280 under 30, I

00:37:18.000 think.

00:37:20.480 So, have

00:37:21.800 you ever heard

00:37:22.080 of the Bible

00:37:22.520 code?

00:37:24.280 There was a

00:37:25.180 story when I

00:37:26.180 was young.

00:37:27.660 There was a

00:37:28.060 story that

00:37:28.560 somebody had

00:37:29.160 determined that

00:37:31.280 the Bible had 0.98

00:37:32.940 code in it,

00:37:34.800 and if you

00:37:35.620 read it a

00:37:36.200 certain way,

00:37:37.000 for example,

00:37:37.980 if you took

00:37:38.400 the first

00:37:39.580 letter of

00:37:40.020 this word,

00:37:40.760 and then

00:37:41.020 the second

00:37:41.480 letter of

00:37:42.000 the next

00:37:42.400 sentence,

00:37:42.960 there were

00:37:43.240 all kinds

00:37:44.180 of little

00:37:44.480 formulas you

00:37:45.200 could run

00:37:45.620 that had

00:37:46.840 produced

00:37:47.400 freakishly

00:37:49.300 accurate

00:37:49.980 predictions of

00:37:52.120 things that

00:37:52.560 are happening

00:37:52.920 in modern

00:37:53.380 times.

00:37:55.320 Did you ever

00:37:55.980 hear that

00:37:56.320 story?

00:37:57.340 It was a

00:37:57.800 big story,

00:37:58.360 national thing,

00:37:59.440 and they

00:37:59.940 showed their

00:38:00.360 work.

00:38:01.200 They showed

00:38:01.620 their work,

00:38:02.100 so you could

00:38:02.460 check it

00:38:02.820 yourself.

00:38:03.240 You could

00:38:03.420 look at the

00:38:03.840 Bible, and

00:38:05.340 you could look

00:38:05.840 at the code

00:38:07.220 breaking thing

00:38:07.900 that they

00:38:08.220 did.

00:38:08.620 They'd say,

00:38:09.740 we're looking

00:38:10.400 at the first

00:38:10.940 letters on the

00:38:11.680 left, or

00:38:12.200 whatever the

00:38:13.080 pattern is,

00:38:14.400 and you could

00:38:16.160 read it for

00:38:16.520 yourself.

00:38:17.480 And sure

00:38:17.780 enough, there

00:38:18.860 were these

00:38:19.420 sentences and

00:38:20.960 words that

00:38:21.560 looked like

00:38:22.020 they were

00:38:22.400 predicting the

00:38:22.980 future.

00:38:25.000 Do you know

00:38:25.720 how that got

00:38:26.340 debunked?

00:38:28.740 How did that

00:38:29.540 get debunked?

00:38:32.520 Somebody took

00:38:33.360 war and peace

00:38:34.260 and ran it

00:38:35.060 through the

00:38:35.340 same filter.

00:38:35.900 guess what?

00:38:38.100 War and

00:38:38.480 peace produced

00:38:39.180 a whole bunch

00:38:39.780 of clear

00:38:41.020 predictions of

00:38:42.020 things that

00:38:42.400 happen in the

00:38:42.900 future.

00:38:44.120 And then they

00:38:44.560 ran some other

00:38:45.200 books through

00:38:45.700 it.

00:38:46.440 Guess what?

00:38:47.900 All books

00:38:48.480 predict the

00:38:49.000 future.

00:38:51.120 Because you

00:38:51.700 just ignore it

00:38:52.520 when it's

00:38:52.880 wrong, or

00:38:53.920 when it's

00:38:54.280 nonsense.

00:38:55.400 And if

00:38:55.720 there are

00:38:56.500 enough words

00:38:57.160 and enough

00:38:57.680 sentences,

00:38:59.800 and you

00:39:00.120 run enough

00:39:00.780 patterns against

00:39:03.380 it, you

00:39:04.660 produce these

00:39:05.580 completely

00:39:06.560 accidental

00:39:07.200 sentences that

00:39:08.160 look like

00:39:08.520 predictions.

00:39:10.500 So the

00:39:11.420 reason that

00:39:11.900 the Bible

00:39:12.280 code fooled

00:39:13.040 the country

00:39:13.920 was because

00:39:15.220 your brain

00:39:15.760 says it

00:39:16.320 can't be a

00:39:16.900 coincidence.

00:39:18.480 But it

00:39:18.780 can be.

00:39:19.820 Just like

00:39:20.520 the two

00:39:21.020 people having

00:39:21.460 the same

00:39:21.820 birthday with

00:39:22.540 only 24 of

00:39:23.880 them in the

00:39:24.220 room or

00:39:24.560 something like

00:39:24.900 that.

00:39:26.260 Somebody says

00:39:26.900 23 people

00:39:28.020 gives you a

00:39:28.680 50% chance

00:39:29.620 of having

00:39:29.920 two people

00:39:30.700 with the

00:39:30.860 same

00:39:31.020 birthday.

00:39:31.960 But whatever

00:39:32.540 the number

00:39:32.920 is, the

00:39:33.220 point is that

00:39:33.780 our common

00:39:35.040 sense of

00:39:35.580 what is

00:39:35.860 likely is

00:39:37.160 so far

00:39:37.760 off.

00:39:38.900 So when

00:39:39.300 you say

00:39:39.600 to me,

00:39:40.100 common

00:39:40.360 sense says

00:39:41.120 that the

00:39:42.300 way they

00:39:42.600 did the

00:39:42.940 geolocation

00:39:43.680 ten times

00:39:45.100 at the

00:39:45.380 same box,

00:39:46.160 plus you

00:39:46.760 also had

00:39:47.480 within a

00:39:48.420 short period

00:39:49.000 and also

00:39:49.960 trips back

00:39:50.640 and forth

00:39:51.140 to a

00:39:52.260 non-profit

00:39:52.800 that is

00:39:53.200 implicated in

00:39:53.900 it, that's

00:39:54.280 way too

00:39:54.620 much

00:39:54.820 coincidence.

00:39:56.000 To which

00:39:56.520 I say,

00:39:58.520 probably not.

00:40:00.640 Probably not.

00:40:01.300 That does

00:40:02.220 not trip

00:40:03.020 my, personally,

00:40:04.920 it doesn't

00:40:05.480 trip my

00:40:06.140 can't be a

00:40:06.820 coincidence

00:40:07.200 meter.

00:40:08.540 To me, it

00:40:08.980 could be.

00:40:10.240 It could

00:40:10.620 totally be

00:40:11.080 a coincidence.

00:40:12.880 So, we

00:40:16.060 still wait

00:40:16.560 for confirmation.

00:40:17.560 I still have

00:40:17.980 the same

00:40:18.320 amount of

00:40:18.760 interest in

00:40:19.560 knowing if

00:40:20.700 those claims

00:40:21.380 can be

00:40:21.800 verified.

00:40:22.780 But I

00:40:23.260 lower my

00:40:23.860 confidence in

00:40:24.560 that.

00:40:26.120 All right.

00:40:26.420 All right.

00:40:26.460 I saw a

00:40:31.860 comment here

00:40:32.340 that, you

00:40:32.960 know, when

00:40:33.320 the Daily

00:40:33.840 Beast reported

00:40:34.680 that some

00:40:35.640 of the

00:40:35.840 January 6th

00:40:36.580 committee

00:40:37.180 members said

00:40:37.820 they do

00:40:38.160 have enough

00:40:38.620 evidence to

00:40:39.420 indict Trump.

00:40:41.120 And Twitter

00:40:42.900 user Sharma

00:40:43.920 asked this,

00:40:45.900 then why

00:40:46.600 don't you

00:40:46.920 take it to

00:40:47.420 court instead

00:40:48.020 of printing

00:40:48.500 in front of

00:40:49.040 TV cameras?

00:40:50.620 You know,

00:40:51.020 like the

00:40:51.920 election fraud

00:40:52.680 claims.

00:40:54.720 If there's

00:40:55.460 no court

00:40:56.020 that ruled

00:40:56.540 there's any

00:40:56.980 election fraud,

00:40:58.740 then we

00:40:59.500 agree as a

00:41:00.160 public that

00:41:00.860 we'll treat

00:41:01.680 it as though

00:41:02.140 it's not

00:41:02.460 there.

00:41:03.540 You can't

00:41:04.000 prove a

00:41:04.340 negative,

00:41:05.520 but you

00:41:05.980 can say

00:41:06.660 you've

00:41:06.900 looked hard

00:41:07.280 enough,

00:41:08.280 and you

00:41:08.660 can agree

00:41:09.080 that you've

00:41:09.540 done it

00:41:09.980 and then

00:41:10.220 go forward.

00:41:11.300 So, we

00:41:11.680 do that

00:41:11.980 with the

00:41:12.220 election,

00:41:12.640 right?

00:41:14.160 Some people

00:41:14.820 had claims,

00:41:15.860 the courts

00:41:16.260 looked at

00:41:16.780 them,

00:41:17.020 they were

00:41:17.260 rejected for

00:41:18.040 a variety

00:41:18.660 of reasons,

00:41:19.320 mostly for

00:41:19.820 standing,

00:41:20.520 I think.

00:41:21.100 You know,

00:41:21.240 it wasn't the

00:41:23.180 right question

00:41:23.640 for the court

00:41:24.140 to look at.

00:41:24.660 And why

00:41:27.820 not do the

00:41:28.300 same thing

00:41:28.920 with the

00:41:30.720 January 6th

00:41:31.420 stuff?

00:41:32.020 If they've

00:41:32.680 got all this

00:41:33.180 stuff to

00:41:33.620 indict Trump,

00:41:35.180 but there's

00:41:37.100 nobody doing

00:41:37.720 any indicting,

00:41:39.440 should they

00:41:39.980 not be able

00:41:40.560 to put the

00:41:41.080 same standard

00:41:41.680 on it and

00:41:42.140 say,

00:41:42.880 if the courts

00:41:43.620 have not

00:41:44.040 found he did

00:41:44.640 anything wrong,

00:41:45.740 let us conclude

00:41:46.740 with certainty

00:41:47.740 that he did

00:41:48.420 nothing wrong?

00:41:49.700 Why isn't it

00:41:50.280 the same?

00:41:50.620 If the

00:41:52.140 courts won't 0.77

00:41:52.820 find anything

00:41:53.800 wrong,

00:41:54.900 then you

00:41:55.320 must conclude

00:41:55.960 nothing was

00:41:56.560 wrong.

00:41:56.940 That's how

00:41:57.260 the election

00:41:57.700 is treated.

00:41:59.160 Let's treat

00:41:59.780 Trump the

00:42:00.480 same way.

00:42:01.300 If there's

00:42:01.720 nothing that

00:42:02.220 was taken

00:42:02.640 to court

00:42:03.220 that became

00:42:04.360 any kind

00:42:04.940 of an actual

00:42:05.460 legal jeopardy,

00:42:07.080 then you

00:42:08.020 can say

00:42:08.500 that Trump

00:42:09.680 was innocent.

00:42:11.820 Definitely

00:42:12.320 innocent.

00:42:14.180 Not just

00:42:14.920 might be

00:42:15.380 innocent,

00:42:16.160 it's the

00:42:16.620 same standard.

00:42:17.780 If you

00:42:18.340 can't prove

00:42:18.760 he did it,

00:42:19.220 he's innocent.

00:42:20.620 If you

00:42:21.000 can't prove

00:42:21.460 the election

00:42:22.000 had any

00:42:22.460 problems,

00:42:23.320 they weren't

00:42:23.860 there.

00:42:24.980 Why not

00:42:25.440 the same

00:42:25.780 standard?

00:42:28.500 Well,

00:42:29.060 we are

00:42:29.300 approaching

00:42:29.680 what I

00:42:30.080 call the

00:42:31.200 Biden gas

00:42:32.180 crossover

00:42:32.880 point.

00:42:34.020 Do you

00:42:34.240 know what

00:42:34.440 that is?

00:42:34.920 The Biden

00:42:35.540 gas

00:42:36.280 crossover

00:42:37.100 point.

00:42:38.780 That's

00:42:39.420 when the

00:42:40.080 Biden's

00:42:40.640 popularity

00:42:41.240 or his

00:42:42.160 approval

00:42:42.600 level

00:42:43.020 number

00:42:44.000 exactly

00:42:44.640 matches

00:42:45.080 the price

00:42:46.040 of a

00:42:47.300 gallon

00:42:47.560 of gas.

00:42:48.940 And I

00:42:49.420 think we're

00:42:49.800 going to

00:42:50.000 get

00:42:50.280 a gallon

00:42:52.720 of gas

00:42:53.180 will be

00:42:53.500 $12

00:42:53.860 a gallon

00:42:54.600 at the

00:42:55.580 same time

00:42:56.020 that Biden's

00:42:56.560 approval

00:42:56.900 level,

00:42:57.560 largely

00:42:57.780 because gas

00:42:58.600 is $12

00:42:59.060 a gallon,

00:43:00.380 will drop

00:43:01.100 from the

00:43:02.100 30s where

00:43:02.920 it is

00:43:03.260 down to

00:43:03.700 $12.

00:43:05.160 And that

00:43:05.860 will be

00:43:06.080 the point

00:43:06.500 where the

00:43:06.900 price of

00:43:07.320 gas and

00:43:08.720 Biden's

00:43:09.100 approval

00:43:09.400 are both

00:43:09.840 $12.

00:43:11.220 That's

00:43:11.560 called the

00:43:12.060 Biden gas

00:43:13.940 crossover

00:43:14.600 point.

00:43:15.660 We're

00:43:16.160 approaching it

00:43:16.700 quickly.

00:43:17.480 Biden gas

00:43:18.540 crossover

00:43:19.460 point.

00:43:20.280 Now,

00:43:21.760 here's a

00:43:22.600 little behind

00:43:23.220 the curtains

00:43:24.100 knowledge.

00:43:24.880 Are you

00:43:25.000 ready for

00:43:25.300 this?

00:43:25.960 To explain

00:43:26.640 something you're

00:43:27.200 seeing in

00:43:27.820 the news

00:43:28.500 that is

00:43:29.260 lacking

00:43:29.600 context,

00:43:30.340 which I'm

00:43:30.880 going to

00:43:31.220 add.

00:43:32.260 You've

00:43:32.560 seen that

00:43:32.860 Bill Barr

00:43:33.600 has dismissed

00:43:35.440 as, to use

00:43:36.240 his word,

00:43:36.800 bullshit

00:43:37.200 during the

00:43:40.400 post-election

00:43:42.040 period of

00:43:43.400 2020,

00:43:44.240 that when

00:43:45.240 Trump was

00:43:45.740 saying the

00:43:46.080 election was

00:43:46.540 rigged.

00:43:47.780 Bill Barr,

00:43:48.620 we now

00:43:49.020 know,

00:43:50.180 was saying

00:43:50.700 that's

00:43:51.020 bullshit.

00:43:52.760 And he

00:43:53.960 also talked

00:43:54.480 about the

00:43:54.820 2000 mules

00:43:55.500 things being

00:43:56.400 unconvincing.

00:43:58.960 Here's the

00:43:59.800 context that's

00:44:01.460 missing.

00:44:03.620 There were

00:44:04.520 two tracks

00:44:05.680 going on at

00:44:06.700 the same

00:44:07.060 time,

00:44:08.700 questioning the

00:44:10.540 election integrity

00:44:11.380 of 2020.

00:44:13.000 One, I

00:44:13.680 will call

00:44:14.100 the batshit

00:44:14.920 crazy track.

00:44:17.080 Those were

00:44:17.580 the people

00:44:17.960 like Sidney

00:44:18.760 Powell, who

00:44:20.400 said there

00:44:20.840 was a

00:44:21.260 Venezuelan

00:44:22.140 general

00:44:22.780 connection to

00:44:23.720 the Dominion

00:44:24.420 software,

00:44:25.540 blah, blah,

00:44:26.120 blah, blah.

00:44:27.440 From day

00:44:28.220 one, I

00:44:29.440 told you,

00:44:30.560 nope, nope,

00:44:31.720 that is

00:44:32.060 obviously not

00:44:32.900 true.

00:44:34.220 Does anybody

00:44:34.800 remember that?

00:44:36.040 On day

00:44:36.400 one, I

00:44:36.880 said, no,

00:44:37.260 the Venezuelan

00:44:37.940 thing, that's

00:44:38.340 just, that is

00:44:39.160 just so on

00:44:39.720 the nose,

00:44:40.420 crazy, obviously

00:44:41.400 untrue.

00:44:42.440 Do not

00:44:42.920 believe it,

00:44:43.300 do not

00:44:43.580 believe it.

00:44:44.720 And now

00:44:45.380 you understand

00:44:46.460 that that was

00:44:47.040 untrue, right?

00:44:49.280 Now I

00:44:49.760 suppose it

00:44:50.420 falls into

00:44:50.780 the category

00:44:51.180 of anything

00:44:51.920 that's

00:44:52.100 possible, but

00:44:53.400 there's no

00:44:53.800 evidence of

00:44:54.380 it, no

00:44:54.900 evidence

00:44:55.240 whatsoever of

00:44:55.960 any Venezuelan

00:44:56.920 connection.

00:44:58.980 But, so

00:45:00.120 that was the

00:45:01.560 sort of thing

00:45:02.060 that Bill

00:45:02.640 Barr would be

00:45:03.480 exposed to.

00:45:05.520 So if you

00:45:06.120 were just an

00:45:06.700 advisor running

00:45:07.540 around in the

00:45:08.120 White House at

00:45:08.640 that period,

00:45:09.500 you would see

00:45:10.100 the news.

00:45:10.700 that would

00:45:11.840 be the

00:45:12.260 biggest thing

00:45:13.120 you'd see.

00:45:13.800 And on the

00:45:14.160 news was

00:45:14.660 Sidney Powell

00:45:15.320 making claims

00:45:16.800 that were

00:45:18.080 clearly bullshit.

00:45:20.000 And Bill

00:45:20.620 Barr had

00:45:21.080 exactly the

00:45:21.880 same attitude

00:45:22.520 I did

00:45:23.060 probably the

00:45:24.260 moment he

00:45:24.700 saw it.

00:45:25.960 You know,

00:45:26.240 I wasn't

00:45:26.560 there, but

00:45:27.600 just guessing

00:45:28.220 based on what

00:45:28.900 he says now,

00:45:30.280 that as soon

00:45:30.740 as he saw it,

00:45:31.340 he was like,

00:45:31.860 okay, okay,

00:45:32.560 Venezuelan,

00:45:33.700 no, no,

00:45:34.740 no, I'm

00:45:35.740 out, that

00:45:36.720 is obviously

00:45:37.300 bullshit.

00:45:38.960 Probably, that

00:45:39.700 was his first

00:45:40.180 opinion.

00:45:41.040 Then there

00:45:41.620 were a bunch

00:45:42.060 of other

00:45:42.380 claims that

00:45:43.440 you saw in

00:45:44.080 the press

00:45:44.540 that looked

00:45:46.040 pretty

00:45:46.380 bullshitty.

00:45:48.060 Here's the

00:45:48.620 part that

00:45:49.360 maybe you

00:45:50.180 didn't know.

00:45:52.160 And it

00:45:52.660 explains why

00:45:53.680 there are so

00:45:54.260 many of you

00:45:54.760 who think

00:45:55.140 there's something

00:45:55.640 there,

00:45:56.760 whereas he

00:45:57.580 was saying

00:45:57.960 that's

00:45:58.260 obviously

00:45:58.620 bullshit.

00:46:00.040 There were

00:46:00.620 two tracks.

00:46:02.460 So in

00:46:02.860 addition to

00:46:03.440 the obvious

00:46:04.120 bullshit

00:46:04.600 Venezuelan

00:46:05.600 stuff,

00:46:07.080 that was

00:46:07.460 the bullshit

00:46:07.900 track,

00:46:09.180 there were

00:46:10.000 a team

00:46:10.600 of volunteers

00:46:11.440 who understood

00:46:12.760 data and

00:46:14.740 were collecting

00:46:15.540 sources on

00:46:16.760 the voter

00:46:17.480 responses and

00:46:18.400 the voter

00:46:18.840 turnouts and

00:46:19.480 stuff.

00:46:20.420 And there

00:46:20.880 was sort

00:46:21.200 of a boiler

00:46:22.100 room of

00:46:23.440 pro-Trump

00:46:24.060 people working

00:46:24.840 to pour

00:46:26.000 through the

00:46:26.420 data and

00:46:27.580 see if there

00:46:28.120 were any

00:46:28.620 obvious signals

00:46:29.860 for fraud.

00:46:31.760 Now, during

00:46:32.280 that time,

00:46:33.160 I had

00:46:33.620 a glancing

00:46:37.160 view of

00:46:40.260 that.

00:46:41.340 So I

00:46:41.720 was not

00:46:42.100 behind the

00:46:42.700 curtain.

00:46:44.020 Yeah, Matt

00:46:44.500 Brainerd being

00:46:45.140 the primary

00:46:45.880 name that

00:46:46.680 you're aware

00:46:47.580 of.

00:46:48.680 So people

00:46:49.400 like Matt

00:46:49.800 Brainerd are 1.00

00:46:50.280 very qualified

00:46:50.960 to look at

00:46:52.020 data and

00:46:52.740 make conclusions

00:46:54.320 and interpretations.

00:46:56.680 And there

00:46:57.280 were a number

00:46:57.640 of other

00:46:57.940 people who

00:46:58.540 were also

00:46:59.180 very qualified.

00:46:59.980 and during

00:47:01.900 that period

00:47:02.440 that Bill

00:47:02.880 Barr was

00:47:03.320 saying the

00:47:04.300 evidence is

00:47:04.900 bullshit, the

00:47:06.780 people who

00:47:07.420 were digging

00:47:08.240 into the

00:47:08.740 data were

00:47:09.400 saying, oh

00:47:10.040 my God, the

00:47:10.800 flags are

00:47:11.400 gigantic.

00:47:12.940 Meaning that

00:47:13.780 there were so

00:47:14.980 many historical

00:47:15.840 precedents being

00:47:16.980 violated that if

00:47:19.540 you were only

00:47:20.100 looking at the

00:47:20.640 data, every

00:47:22.800 spider instinct in

00:47:24.480 the world would

00:47:25.040 go off.

00:47:26.780 Which is

00:47:27.460 different from

00:47:27.940 saying there

00:47:28.320 was anything

00:47:28.660 wrong with

00:47:29.140 it.

00:47:29.860 Because you

00:47:30.520 know what the

00:47:31.000 explanation for

00:47:32.020 all of that

00:47:32.620 data was?

00:47:35.200 More people

00:47:35.980 voted for

00:47:36.740 Biden than

00:47:37.480 you thought.

00:47:41.140 That's it.

00:47:42.660 The counter

00:47:43.380 argument was

00:47:44.300 surprisingly good.

00:47:47.260 That, yeah, a

00:47:48.520 lot more people

00:47:49.100 voted for

00:47:49.560 Biden than

00:47:50.160 we expected.

00:47:52.940 Because, you

00:47:53.620 know, Trump

00:47:53.960 was so divisive

00:47:54.980 that, you

00:47:56.700 know, the

00:47:57.320 polling maybe

00:47:57.940 wasn't that

00:47:58.460 accurate this

00:47:59.000 time and just

00:48:00.600 more people

00:48:01.080 voted for

00:48:01.580 Biden.

00:48:02.660 And it

00:48:03.180 could be that

00:48:03.840 it was just

00:48:04.700 the games that

00:48:05.320 were played

00:48:05.660 before the

00:48:06.200 election in

00:48:07.420 terms of,

00:48:08.260 you know, how

00:48:09.820 the vote could

00:48:11.900 be executed, 0.95

00:48:13.020 you know, the

00:48:13.600 ballot, the

00:48:14.640 mail-in ballots,

00:48:15.600 et cetera.

00:48:16.060 It could have

00:48:16.600 just favored

00:48:17.080 Democrats.

00:48:18.260 So it could

00:48:18.820 be just the

00:48:19.700 population of the

00:48:21.400 country increased,

00:48:23.260 which is, by

00:48:23.820 the way, most

00:48:24.560 of the

00:48:24.820 explanation of

00:48:25.700 why there

00:48:25.980 were so

00:48:26.280 many Biden

00:48:26.780 votes.

00:48:27.780 A lot of

00:48:28.280 people on

00:48:28.580 the right

00:48:28.840 never hear

00:48:29.300 that, which

00:48:30.580 always bugs

00:48:31.080 me.

00:48:32.240 Because it's

00:48:32.980 embarrassing to

00:48:33.860 say there's

00:48:35.380 no way that

00:48:35.940 Biden could have

00:48:36.580 gotten this

00:48:37.260 many votes.

00:48:39.280 You should

00:48:40.020 say you

00:48:41.640 don't think he

00:48:42.300 could have

00:48:42.680 gotten more

00:48:43.440 votes than

00:48:44.020 Trump.

00:48:45.400 Now, if you

00:48:46.140 said that, you

00:48:46.880 couldn't, you

00:48:47.620 know, you don't

00:48:48.000 have any proof

00:48:49.240 of it, but

00:48:50.740 you'd at

00:48:51.160 least be in

00:48:51.600 the reasonable

00:48:52.640 category.

00:48:53.700 If what you're

00:48:54.480 talking about is

00:48:55.060 just the raw

00:48:55.660 number of

00:48:56.160 votes, you

00:48:57.080 have to

00:48:57.340 calculate it

00:48:58.000 in that the

00:48:58.360 population itself

00:48:59.300 increased, and

00:49:00.840 pretty much

00:49:01.520 explains that

00:49:02.220 number.

00:49:04.020 That plus

00:49:04.880 mail-in votes,

00:49:06.260 that plus, you

00:49:07.520 know, Trump

00:49:08.000 got people out

00:49:08.740 to vote.

00:49:10.060 So much of

00:49:12.360 what you saw

00:49:13.020 can be explained

00:49:13.940 by a lot of

00:49:15.180 people voted.

00:49:15.700 But at the

00:49:18.460 time, at the

00:49:20.440 time, when

00:49:21.260 Bill Barr was

00:49:22.000 looking at

00:49:22.540 probably, so

00:49:23.500 here's the part

00:49:24.100 that I'm going

00:49:24.520 to add for

00:49:24.960 your context,

00:49:26.220 Bill Barr was

00:49:26.920 probably looking

00:49:28.020 at the

00:49:28.660 Venezuelan

00:49:29.860 bullshit claims

00:49:30.800 and saying,

00:49:31.780 okay, I don't

00:49:32.160 see anything

00:49:32.600 here, this is

00:49:33.080 bullshit.

00:49:33.880 He was

00:49:34.440 probably not,

00:49:35.960 probably not

00:49:38.060 in contact

00:49:39.260 with the people

00:49:40.020 who were looking

00:49:40.580 at the raw

00:49:41.100 data and

00:49:42.200 saying, we've

00:49:42.740 got all kinds

00:49:43.400 of anomalies

00:49:44.460 here.

00:49:45.700 There were

00:49:46.560 all kinds

00:49:47.040 of anomalies.

00:49:48.320 But, were

00:49:50.080 those anomalies

00:49:51.040 the kind like

00:49:51.980 the Bible

00:49:52.520 code?

00:49:54.380 See, here's

00:49:54.900 the problem.

00:49:56.900 The code

00:49:57.840 that allegedly

00:49:58.960 were in the

00:49:59.480 Bible turned

00:50:00.060 out to be

00:50:00.480 just random.

00:50:01.920 But what

00:50:02.260 about all

00:50:02.660 these anomalies

00:50:03.540 that were

00:50:04.780 being found?

00:50:05.500 Oh, this

00:50:05.960 district couldn't

00:50:07.560 have flipped

00:50:08.100 blue so

00:50:09.260 easily.

00:50:10.760 Maybe every

00:50:12.000 election produces

00:50:13.020 lots of anomalies,

00:50:14.600 but since

00:50:15.040 they're spread

00:50:15.580 out, nobody

00:50:16.200 looks at

00:50:16.580 them, nobody

00:50:16.900 cares, and

00:50:18.200 maybe this

00:50:18.600 time they

00:50:18.900 looked harder

00:50:19.420 and there

00:50:20.380 are always

00:50:20.760 anomalies.

00:50:22.160 So that

00:50:22.460 could be

00:50:22.680 part of it.

00:50:25.720 Somebody

00:50:26.180 said he

00:50:26.600 knew, come

00:50:27.200 on.

00:50:28.460 You think

00:50:28.920 that Bill

00:50:29.300 Barr knew

00:50:30.160 that the

00:50:30.500 election was

00:50:31.100 rigged?

00:50:32.460 I don't

00:50:33.020 think that.

00:50:33.380 I mean, I

00:50:36.440 would respect

00:50:38.020 your opinion

00:50:38.640 on that, but

00:50:39.980 I would

00:50:40.320 respectfully

00:50:41.260 disagree.

00:50:42.660 I don't

00:50:42.960 think there's

00:50:43.340 evidence that

00:50:43.900 he had that

00:50:45.020 kind of

00:50:45.460 knowledge.

00:50:46.120 Because my

00:50:46.580 take on him

00:50:47.220 is if he had

00:50:48.480 that kind of

00:50:48.980 knowledge, he

00:50:49.380 would have

00:50:49.560 told us.

00:50:50.740 He seems

00:50:51.320 like a pretty

00:50:51.860 straight shooter,

00:50:52.720 actually.

00:50:53.840 More so than

00:50:54.880 other people in

00:50:55.760 the business.

00:50:56.180 So I've

00:51:00.740 got a

00:51:00.940 feeling that

00:51:01.420 Bill Barr

00:51:01.940 was not

00:51:02.400 on the

00:51:02.840 inside, where

00:51:05.120 the data

00:51:05.740 people were

00:51:06.280 finding things

00:51:07.060 that quite

00:51:08.060 appropriately got

00:51:09.720 them alarmed.

00:51:11.200 Now, let me

00:51:11.780 be really

00:51:12.200 clear.

00:51:13.220 When I say

00:51:13.820 they were

00:51:14.240 appropriately

00:51:15.020 alarmed at

00:51:16.020 the data

00:51:16.700 anomalies, I

00:51:18.660 am not

00:51:19.040 saying those

00:51:20.180 data anomalies

00:51:20.980 are evidence of

00:51:22.860 any wrongdoing.

00:51:24.480 But there were

00:51:25.240 lots of

00:51:25.560 anomalies.

00:51:26.180 And here's

00:51:30.660 my overall

00:51:31.280 view of the

00:51:31.860 election.

00:51:32.360 If it was

00:51:32.880 not rigged,

00:51:36.440 someday it

00:51:37.220 will be.

00:51:38.820 It has to

00:51:39.640 be.

00:51:40.780 If it

00:51:41.460 wasn't rigged,

00:51:42.200 and I don't

00:51:42.880 know that it

00:51:43.240 was, it

00:51:44.240 will be,

00:51:45.260 because we're

00:51:45.620 not doing

00:51:45.980 anything to

00:51:46.540 stop it.

00:51:48.720 As long as

00:51:49.560 we don't have

00:51:49.960 transparency of

00:51:51.060 the digital

00:51:51.520 part, and

00:51:52.600 we don't

00:51:53.000 have instant

00:51:54.640 audits, and

00:51:55.780 as long as

00:51:56.200 I can't

00:51:56.680 verify that

00:51:57.460 my personal

00:51:58.140 vote ended

00:51:58.840 up where it

00:51:59.280 was supposed

00:51:59.680 to, as

00:52:00.800 long as I

00:52:01.340 can't tell

00:52:01.780 where my

00:52:02.260 vote went,

00:52:03.720 yeah, it

00:52:04.860 will be

00:52:05.340 rigged, we

00:52:06.300 just don't

00:52:06.660 know when.

00:52:08.900 Does anybody

00:52:09.620 disagree with

00:52:10.240 that statement,

00:52:10.860 by the way?

00:52:12.100 Is there

00:52:12.400 anybody who

00:52:12.840 would disagree

00:52:13.260 with the

00:52:13.600 statement that

00:52:14.760 because it's

00:52:15.320 possible, and

00:52:17.040 because we've

00:52:17.720 got time,

00:52:18.520 nobody's

00:52:18.880 fixing it,

00:52:19.660 it will be

00:52:20.220 election after

00:52:20.880 election, if

00:52:21.960 you wait long

00:52:22.560 enough, it's

00:52:24.060 guaranteed.

00:52:26.000 It's

00:52:26.480 guaranteed.

00:52:27.520 You don't

00:52:28.000 even have to

00:52:28.460 wonder if it

00:52:29.040 will happen.

00:52:29.700 It's

00:52:29.900 guaranteed.

00:52:30.500 Yeah, it's

00:52:30.780 monkeys and

00:52:31.280 typewriters.

00:52:31.800 It's just

00:52:32.080 math.

00:52:34.120 And we act

00:52:35.380 as though we

00:52:38.400 can prove a

00:52:39.040 negative, that

00:52:40.200 by not knowing

00:52:40.960 something happened

00:52:41.600 means it didn't

00:52:42.180 happen.

00:52:43.100 We just act

00:52:43.780 like that's

00:52:44.360 okay.

00:52:46.540 The team that

00:52:47.420 wants you to

00:52:47.980 believe science

00:52:48.820 also wants you

00:52:50.100 to believe that

00:52:50.620 they proved a

00:52:51.260 negative right in

00:52:51.900 front of you.

00:52:52.620 Well, we proved

00:52:53.380 nothing happened.

00:52:54.740 No, you

00:52:55.260 didn't.

00:52:56.300 That's not how

00:52:56.960 any of that

00:52:57.420 works.

00:52:58.840 You can

00:52:59.200 simply prove

00:52:59.820 that there's,

00:53:00.680 you can show

00:53:01.220 that nobody

00:53:02.080 proved it did

00:53:02.700 happen.

00:53:03.800 But when you

00:53:04.480 have a situation

00:53:05.200 that guarantees

00:53:05.960 it's going to

00:53:06.540 happen, and

00:53:07.760 that's what we

00:53:08.200 have, a

00:53:09.560 non-transparent

00:53:10.560 system with a

00:53:12.260 high payoff for

00:53:13.600 rigging it,

00:53:15.300 lots of

00:53:15.800 people who

00:53:16.220 would love to

00:53:16.640 do it, and

00:53:18.380 lots of

00:53:18.720 time.

00:53:20.560 There's just

00:53:21.120 no way it's

00:53:21.680 going to go

00:53:21.980 any other

00:53:22.320 way.

00:53:24.360 All right, so

00:53:25.100 that's my

00:53:25.560 behind-the-curtain

00:53:26.540 view.

00:53:28.700 I think that

00:53:29.300 Bill Barr has

00:53:30.080 an accurate

00:53:32.160 opinion formed

00:53:33.160 from what he

00:53:33.960 had exposure

00:53:35.000 to at the

00:53:35.600 time.

00:53:36.700 I believe that

00:53:37.540 if he had

00:53:37.980 had more

00:53:38.420 exposure to

00:53:39.220 the people

00:53:39.560 looking at

00:53:40.000 the data

00:53:40.440 anomalies,

00:53:42.000 which I do

00:53:42.720 not assert

00:53:44.140 mean anything,

00:53:45.880 I'm not

00:53:46.260 asserting they

00:53:46.780 mean anything,

00:53:47.560 but if he'd

00:53:48.260 seen that many

00:53:48.900 anomalies, and

00:53:50.560 I saw them, like

00:53:51.940 I was hearing

00:53:52.480 about them in

00:53:53.060 real time, but

00:53:54.220 I was also

00:53:54.700 shutting up about

00:53:55.600 it, for the

00:53:56.620 most part, because

00:53:58.000 I was like,

00:53:58.500 eh, I'm going

00:54:00.020 to have to wait

00:54:00.420 for a second

00:54:00.900 opinion on

00:54:01.420 this, because

00:54:03.060 it was a

00:54:03.460 little too

00:54:03.820 enthusiastic,

00:54:05.520 you know, there

00:54:05.820 was a little

00:54:06.400 too much, oh

00:54:07.000 yeah, we got

00:54:07.680 them now, these

00:54:09.140 numbers, these

00:54:10.000 numbers prove

00:54:10.720 it, no, and

00:54:12.140 I would hear

00:54:12.700 stuff like

00:54:13.180 that at the

00:54:13.700 time, and

00:54:14.940 I'd think, no,

00:54:17.520 I'll bet

00:54:17.820 not.

00:54:21.560 All right,

00:54:23.020 that, ladies 0.97

00:54:23.720 and gentlemen,

00:54:24.160 is not only

00:54:26.320 the best

00:54:26.800 live stream

00:54:27.320 you've ever

00:54:27.740 heard in

00:54:28.320 your life,

00:54:29.560 but an

00:54:30.660 actual physical

00:54:31.440 joy for

00:54:32.980 many of

00:54:33.340 you.

00:54:34.860 Yeah, best

00:54:35.500 ever.

00:54:35.720 And if

00:54:38.920 you would

00:54:39.200 like to

00:54:39.740 get another

00:54:41.040 hit of

00:54:41.460 this, I'll

00:54:43.480 be back

00:54:43.840 tomorrow, same

00:54:45.860 time every

00:54:46.380 day.

00:54:47.260 If you're

00:54:47.940 on YouTube,

00:54:50.220 you might

00:54:50.760 want to hit

00:54:51.080 that subscribe

00:54:51.640 button so

00:54:52.460 you don't

00:54:53.340 miss this

00:54:54.040 dopamine hit

00:54:54.920 again.

00:54:56.100 If you're

00:54:56.780 on the

00:54:57.040 Locals

00:54:57.340 platform, you're

00:54:59.340 sexy, you're 0.71

00:55:00.420 smart, and

00:55:02.140 you're better

00:55:02.560 than everybody

00:55:03.100 else.

00:55:03.480 No, that's

00:55:05.500 not true.

00:55:07.500 But it

00:55:08.140 does make

00:55:09.860 me remember

00:55:11.280 a, I'm

00:55:12.560 going to

00:55:12.700 give you a

00:55:13.100 media

00:55:13.480 recommendation.

00:55:15.540 Qualified.

00:55:17.200 Right?

00:55:17.640 So I'm

00:55:17.940 going to

00:55:18.100 tell you some

00:55:18.760 entertainment

00:55:19.360 that you can

00:55:20.180 go watch on

00:55:20.980 video form that

00:55:22.680 I'm really

00:55:23.640 entertained by

00:55:24.360 right now.

00:55:25.580 It's called

00:55:26.540 The Boys.

00:55:28.540 Have you

00:55:28.840 heard of

00:55:29.080 it?

00:55:30.840 It's about

00:55:31.840 sort of a,

00:55:33.480 it imagines a

00:55:34.740 time where

00:55:35.220 there are a

00:55:35.680 variety of

00:55:36.220 superheroes, but

00:55:38.340 their take on

00:55:39.800 it is amazing.

00:55:43.040 Now, I did

00:55:45.140 not enjoy the

00:55:45.920 first season.

00:55:48.260 So let me say

00:55:49.060 this clearly.

00:55:50.040 It's on season

00:55:50.720 three.

00:55:51.600 I did not

00:55:52.520 enjoy the

00:55:53.080 first season.

00:55:55.020 And I don't

00:55:55.840 think I watched

00:55:56.380 the second season

00:55:57.160 because I didn't

00:55:58.920 enjoy the first

00:55:59.580 one.

00:55:59.760 I happened to

00:56:01.480 tune in on the

00:56:02.100 third season.

00:56:04.140 Oh, my God.

00:56:06.280 And I think

00:56:07.580 what they did

00:56:08.300 was they

00:56:09.940 evolved or

00:56:12.000 they learned and

00:56:12.940 grew from

00:56:13.680 wherever they

00:56:14.320 started from.

00:56:15.100 Because I don't

00:56:15.640 know that they

00:56:16.120 always thought

00:56:16.640 they were going

00:56:17.120 to take the

00:56:17.620 arc in this

00:56:18.320 direction.

00:56:19.240 But where they

00:56:20.000 took it features

00:56:20.880 one of the

00:56:21.460 characters who

00:56:23.020 plays the best

00:56:24.460 evil character

00:56:25.820 you've seen

00:56:28.860 in a long

00:56:29.420 time, probably

00:56:30.180 since the

00:56:30.940 Joker.

00:56:33.320 So think

00:56:34.020 about the

00:56:35.540 best evil

00:56:37.400 hero, the

00:56:38.180 one you watch

00:56:38.740 the show for

00:56:39.340 to watch the

00:56:39.840 evil one instead

00:56:40.600 of the good

00:56:41.020 one.

00:56:42.380 And, oh,

00:56:43.420 God, the

00:56:43.840 guy who plays

00:56:44.480 a character

00:56:45.380 called Homelander.

00:56:47.100 He's a superhero,

00:56:48.200 but he's the

00:56:48.640 strongest one.

00:56:50.360 And the thing

00:56:51.280 that makes it

00:56:52.000 so amazing is

00:56:54.760 how well he

00:56:55.380 inhabits the

00:56:56.120 character.

00:56:57.200 Now, I'll

00:56:58.000 warn you that

00:56:59.580 they do make

00:57:00.420 the character

00:57:01.000 sort of like a

00:57:02.280 Donald Trump

00:57:02.880 character.

00:57:04.160 And that's

00:57:04.780 not, it's

00:57:05.620 unmistakable that

00:57:06.680 they're making

00:57:08.160 him an America

00:57:08.940 first bad guy.

00:57:11.500 But they do it

00:57:12.520 so well.

00:57:13.340 And the actor,

00:57:14.280 I wish I knew

00:57:14.840 his name so I

00:57:15.760 could give him a

00:57:16.260 shadow.

00:57:16.800 But the actor

00:57:17.540 who plays that

00:57:18.220 part, amazing.

00:57:20.580 Like every scene

00:57:21.400 where he's talking

00:57:22.680 menacingly to

00:57:24.180 somebody and

00:57:24.960 like you think

00:57:25.820 that he's going

00:57:26.420 to kill that

00:57:26.860 person at any

00:57:27.380 moment, but

00:57:28.420 then he doesn't.

00:57:30.560 It is so fun

00:57:32.460 to watch.

00:57:33.240 Only for the

00:57:34.080 quality of the

00:57:35.240 acting.

00:57:37.020 Right?

00:57:37.400 Now, here's the

00:57:38.500 qualified part.

00:57:39.660 It is so bloody.

00:57:41.840 It's like the

00:57:42.560 bloodiest thing I've

00:57:43.320 ever seen.

00:57:44.120 But a lot of the

00:57:44.780 bloodshed is almost

00:57:45.980 humorously over the

00:57:47.860 top.

00:57:49.180 So when people get

00:57:50.100 killed in this,

00:57:51.380 the bloodshed I

00:57:52.320 don't like is

00:57:54.080 where, you know,

00:57:55.000 somebody gets

00:57:55.600 mutilated or

00:57:56.420 something and it

00:57:57.140 looks too realistic.

00:57:58.480 But in this,

00:57:59.340 people just

00:57:59.740 explode or heads

00:58:01.820 fall off and

00:58:02.860 stuff.

00:58:03.180 So it's all,

00:58:04.000 it's gory in

00:58:05.840 almost a

00:58:06.380 Halloween way.

00:58:07.500 It's so over the

00:58:08.280 top.

00:58:09.400 So it's so over

00:58:10.320 the top it

00:58:10.760 doesn't feel real

00:58:12.040 enough to bother

00:58:12.860 you the way

00:58:13.400 normally it would.

00:58:16.100 So that's your

00:58:16.840 recommendation.

00:58:17.300 The Boys season

00:58:20.280 three.

00:58:21.780 You might have to

00:58:22.680 watch season one

00:58:23.460 and two to get

00:58:24.020 into it, but not

00:58:26.620 necessarily.

00:58:28.060 Season three is

00:58:28.700 brilliant.

00:58:29.120 Maybe season two

00:58:29.820 was as well.

00:58:30.500 I just didn't

00:58:31.040 watch it, so I

00:58:31.820 don't know.

00:58:39.020 Scott, look into

00:58:39.860 the Chinese room

00:58:40.820 experiment to

00:58:41.980 explain Lambda.

00:58:44.000 I don't think

00:58:44.780 that's going to

00:58:45.300 change my opinion

00:58:46.040 on anything.

00:58:47.300 Because remember,

00:58:48.360 my opinion on

00:58:48.980 artificial intelligence

00:58:49.880 is it's alive when

00:58:51.360 it seems that way

00:58:52.100 to you.

00:58:53.220 So if the Chinese 0.97

00:58:54.280 room is just going

00:58:55.120 to tell me that's

00:58:56.680 how they faked

00:58:57.840 it, it doesn't

00:58:59.820 matter.

00:59:00.900 It doesn't matter

00:59:01.620 how they did it.

00:59:03.020 It matters how I

00:59:03.840 receive it.

00:59:05.880 All right.

00:59:10.220 I think that's

00:59:15.440 all for now.

00:59:16.180 I'm going to say

00:59:16.600 bye to you

00:59:17.280 YouTube, and I'll

00:59:17.700 see you tomorrow.

00:59:18.840 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 14, 2022

Episode 1774 Scott Adams： Let Me Tell You What You Don't Know About The J6 Hearings And The Election

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript