Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1781 Scott Adams： The News Is Perfectly Constructed Today. Come Savor It With Me

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best thing that's ever happened.

00:00:11.320 Today I plan to solve all of the problems that you knew you had,

00:00:16.360 at least seven to nine problems you didn't even know you had.

00:00:20.920 They'll be solved before they even become part of your conscious mind.

00:00:24.440 Yeah. And the way to do that is via something called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:33.060 Now, you don't have to participate to get the benefits, but just knowing that it exists, that's enough.

00:00:39.720 And all you need if you want to participate is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein,

00:00:44.460 a canteen, jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:50.020 I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:58.760 The dopamine to the other day, the thing that makes everything better. Everything.

00:01:04.160 It's called the simultaneous sip, but it happens now. Go.

00:01:10.840 Oh.

00:01:11.520 I didn't think it was possible, but I think I undersold it.

00:01:19.880 I undersold it.

00:01:23.440 Once again, better than I could have ever imagined.

00:01:28.900 Well, I told you in the title to this live stream that it was going to be a perfect news day.

00:01:35.620 What would the perfect news item sound like?

00:01:41.200 If you were going to be the designer of news and you said,

00:01:45.820 all right, let's sit down today.

00:01:48.120 I'm going to concoct some news.

00:01:51.180 It won't even be something that's new.

00:01:54.220 So it doesn't even have to be about something that's just happening right away.

00:01:59.300 Could be some longer term story, but we're going to concoct it into news.

00:02:05.420 What would be the perfect one?

00:02:07.780 Well, it turns out we don't have to wonder because the perfect news item has come to us thanks to the simulation.

00:02:18.520 And what would the perfect news item be?

00:02:21.260 Here it is.

00:02:22.820 The ultimate, and of course it's better on Fox News, but the ultimate Fox News story.

00:02:28.180 This is real, by the way.

00:02:30.500 I'm not making this up.

00:02:32.200 This next part is real.

00:02:35.060 Elon Musk's child, Xavier Alexander Musk, has asked for both a name change and a new birth certificate reflecting a new gender identity.

00:02:47.780 That is a perfect news story.

00:02:51.460 Now, to top it off, to make it more perfect.

00:02:58.180 Elon Musk has said publicly that he's very pro-trans.

00:03:04.340 So, so far, so far the news doesn't have any bite because the famous person in the news, the richest man in the world,

00:03:13.680 is, you know, his personal view is compatible with what's happening in his family, so that's all good.

00:03:18.840 So, you know, I'm glad about that.

00:03:22.000 But he did say, Elon Musk did say, that the pronoun thing is an aesthetic mess, meaning that it's just hard to navigate the different pronouns.

00:03:34.800 And I think most of us would agree at least that far.

00:03:40.440 Can we at least all agree that even, you know, no matter what you think about what pronouns should be used,

00:03:47.360 I think we'd all agree that it could be a little confusing, a little awkward.

00:03:51.840 Yeah, it's a little extra work.

00:03:53.340 A little extra work.

00:03:54.220 So, imagine being the richest man in the world because you are also one of the smartest, best inventors.

00:04:04.860 You know, I think of Elon Musk as sort of an inventor entrepreneur.

00:04:09.100 So imagine being an inventor by nature,

00:04:12.380 and you see that the way the trans community has decided to handle the pronoun stuff,

00:04:18.420 and the supporters and other people as well,

00:04:22.340 is picking one of the few words, they and them,

00:04:27.400 that is confusing.

00:04:30.500 Because it refers to multiple people instead of one.

00:04:34.660 Of all the ways you could have solved this,

00:04:38.700 why did you have to pick words

00:04:40.480 that are confusing in terms of the number of people involved?

00:04:46.520 Of all the solutions,

00:04:48.420 now imagine being the, you know,

00:04:50.620 Elon Musk,

00:04:52.140 and you're thinking,

00:04:53.000 all right,

00:04:54.000 so you've got this situation where the pronoun could be confusing.

00:04:57.520 So maybe we should stop using he and she,

00:05:00.820 and her and him,

00:05:02.260 because now, you know,

00:05:03.240 there's some ambiguity with those words.

00:05:05.920 So why would you add an extra ambiguity

00:05:08.460 when you're trying to deal with the other ambiguity?

00:05:14.000 Why would you create a new ambiguity of the number of people involved?

00:05:19.100 Now, it's not real ambiguity,

00:05:20.640 because usually you can tell in context.

00:05:23.100 But at least your brain is still going,

00:05:24.940 wait, multiple?

00:05:25.960 Oh, single.

00:05:26.900 Oh, okay.

00:05:27.960 And then it has to go on.

00:05:29.380 So it's like this little speed bump for your brain.

00:05:32.020 Very, very unnecessary.

00:05:34.420 Now, let me ask you this.

00:05:35.640 You don't think that out of the 7 billion of us,

00:05:39.280 if we did a little brainstorming,

00:05:41.620 we could come up with a new pronoun

00:05:43.520 for a single person,

00:05:45.740 an individual.

00:05:48.580 We can't do that?

00:05:49.800 Of all the things the humans on this planet would like to do,

00:05:55.100 now, it's something better than it.

00:06:00.360 You know, you're making my point.

00:06:02.260 There are 7 billion of us.

00:06:03.880 I'm sure,

00:06:05.320 I'm sure we can come up with a non-insulting name,

00:06:10.280 pronoun,

00:06:11.500 a non-insulting pronoun

00:06:13.200 that doesn't also confuse you about the number of people involved.

00:06:16.800 Do you think that's too big of a hurdle?

00:06:20.500 Do you think that we've become such a divided country

00:06:23.500 that we couldn't do that?

00:06:26.900 I honestly can't think of an easier problem to solve.

00:06:33.380 We just come up with a word that hasn't been used before.

00:06:38.680 May I suggest that whatever our new word is,

00:06:42.600 let me add a specification here.

00:06:44.600 Let me suggest that whatever the new word is,

00:06:47.400 it can't add ambiguity, number one,

00:06:49.960 but it should not be a word we already use for something else.

00:06:54.360 Can we at least fucking agree on that?

00:06:58.760 Why?

00:06:59.500 Why?

00:07:00.760 Why?

00:07:01.380 Why would you use a word that's being used for something else?

00:07:05.680 Of all the letters,

00:07:07.540 you've got a lot of letter combinations.

00:07:10.100 You could make up a new word

00:07:12.680 that hadn't been used and abused

00:07:15.560 and burdened by other purposes.

00:07:20.260 How in the world can we not solve this?

00:07:24.260 Is it just me?

00:07:27.000 It honestly seems like the world's simplest problem,

00:07:30.580 and we can't figure it out.

00:07:32.480 All right.

00:07:33.340 We like to fight.

00:07:34.480 I'm going to give CNN more credit today.

00:07:40.180 They ran a major opinion piece

00:07:42.000 from an anti-abortion proponent.

00:07:47.680 Does that seem like a change in mission for CNN?

00:07:52.220 Because I'm not sure that I've, you know,

00:07:56.640 tracked this particular topic

00:07:58.300 and how they've handled it before,

00:08:00.300 but the thing I'm looking for

00:08:02.420 is that CNN has, at least the new boss,

00:08:06.020 has said that they're going to be more balanced.

00:08:09.440 Is this an example of that?

00:08:11.620 Because it surprised me.

00:08:13.480 It looked like something you would see

00:08:15.200 on Fox News' opinion site,

00:08:17.680 but it was on CNN's opinion site.

00:08:19.580 So, can we agree,

00:08:23.260 in the spirit of togetherness

00:08:26.700 and good intentions,

00:08:30.580 could we agree that CNN did this well

00:08:33.440 in the sense that they showed an opinion

00:08:36.440 that is less common for their base supporters?

00:08:42.660 I don't know.

00:08:43.220 I think you have to give this to them, I think.

00:08:46.540 Now, whether this helps their profitability,

00:08:50.480 that's a big question.

00:08:52.100 I'm not sure it will.

00:08:54.460 I'd love to say that I advise them to do this

00:08:57.960 from a business perspective,

00:09:00.720 but I don't know how they can make money

00:09:03.460 by being unbiased.

00:09:04.940 I honestly don't.

00:09:06.740 If anybody knew that,

00:09:08.100 they'd already be doing it.

00:09:10.020 But I hope it works out.

00:09:12.280 All right, here I'm going to solve

00:09:13.820 just about all the problems in the world,

00:09:15.380 if you don't mind.

00:09:17.120 See, we'll solve everything from

00:09:18.960 food shortages,

00:09:21.640 water shortages,

00:09:23.640 we're going to take on climate change,

00:09:30.280 you know, a lot of employment problems,

00:09:32.600 poverty,

00:09:34.200 and we're going to do it all

00:09:38.160 with one idea.

00:09:38.960 I've got one word for you.

00:09:44.180 Trenches.

00:09:46.300 Trenches.

00:09:48.140 Now, you know that Elon Musk,

00:09:50.420 and by the way,

00:09:51.480 I'm not sure if you know this,

00:09:52.560 but there was a rule change recently.

00:09:56.960 You know the old rule last year?

00:09:59.460 If there was anything you wanted to talk about,

00:10:02.020 it had to have a Joe Rogan connection.

00:10:04.220 That was sort of a 2021,

00:10:08.520 maybe early 2022 thing.

00:10:10.580 But the rule has changed now.

00:10:11.940 Everything has to have some kind of

00:10:13.200 an Elon Musk reference.

00:10:15.460 Or else it's just not worth saying.

00:10:17.920 I mean, what's the point?

00:10:19.840 So the Elon Musk reference for this story

00:10:22.680 is that you know he owns a company

00:10:24.640 called the Boring Company

00:10:26.240 that literally bores tunnels.

00:10:28.520 It's a tunnel-making giant device.

00:10:32.800 But here's the problem.

00:10:34.880 When you make a tunnel,

00:10:36.800 you need to reinforce it,

00:10:39.500 and there are a whole bunch

00:10:40.580 of other considerations.

00:10:43.420 But if you were to make a trench

00:10:45.120 and you intended to cover it,

00:10:50.600 it would be much easier.

00:10:52.020 So imagine this.

00:10:53.380 Imagine a gigantic device,

00:10:55.740 perhaps so gigantic

00:10:56.760 and even is powered by

00:10:58.080 a small nuclear module.

00:11:02.500 Because now, you know,

00:11:03.500 something like a nuclear submarine has.

00:11:05.920 Or a nuclear warship of some kind.

00:11:09.300 So imagine it's a gigantic

00:11:11.640 earth-moving trencher

00:11:14.160 with a gigantic nuclear engine

00:11:17.020 so it can just like build trenches like crazy.

00:11:19.820 And it just builds a trench

00:11:21.080 that's exactly the right dimension

00:11:24.140 that when you put mirrored walls on the side

00:11:27.920 and you cover it

00:11:29.240 with some kind of standardized,

00:11:31.560 you know, let's say 20-foot metal crossbars

00:11:35.920 with some kind of a plastic

00:11:38.240 or see-through hothouse top,

00:11:42.260 that you could create

00:11:43.760 these infinite indoor gardens

00:11:45.680 and also create some bricks

00:11:48.340 at the same time.

00:11:49.180 Because one of the things that Elon Musk,

00:11:51.380 you know, again,

00:11:52.240 this is a double Musk reference,

00:11:55.100 because you really can't understand anything

00:11:56.740 until you know how it relates

00:11:58.120 to something Elon Musk has said or done.

00:12:01.200 And so Elon Musk has said

00:12:02.340 that his tunnel-making company

00:12:05.240 will also have some kind of a brick-making company

00:12:08.760 so they can turn the extra dirt

00:12:10.940 into bricks on site.

00:12:13.020 So imagine that this thing

00:12:15.280 is a gigantic robotic tunnel or trencher.

00:12:20.200 It goes out where people need more food

00:12:22.760 and it just trenches the heck out of it

00:12:25.320 and puts it indoors.

00:12:26.240 Now, what benefits do you get

00:12:27.680 by moving it indoors?

00:12:30.540 Number one,

00:12:32.000 because it's mostly below the ground

00:12:34.100 and you could control, you know,

00:12:37.000 somewhat the top and other factors,

00:12:39.940 you could control the temperature

00:12:41.640 like nobody's business.

00:12:44.280 You could also have mirrored walls

00:12:46.200 such that a 20-foot trench

00:12:49.200 would always have sun from every direction

00:12:51.720 because there would be enough mirrors

00:12:54.400 to plants that no matter where the sun is,

00:12:57.440 it's getting sun.

00:13:00.360 So now you've controlled temperature,

00:13:02.440 you could control for bugs

00:13:03.840 because it's indoors,

00:13:05.400 you could control for water

00:13:07.240 because your evaporation,

00:13:09.620 I believe you could control for that, right?

00:13:11.640 and just recapture the evaporation.

00:13:14.620 So now you've got water, food,

00:13:16.720 of course it would create employment

00:13:17.980 because it's, you know,

00:13:18.940 you still need humans.

00:13:20.480 Maybe you have some robots

00:13:22.340 eventually harvesting stuff.

00:13:24.740 But you would solve everything

00:13:27.420 from fertilizers to what?

00:13:32.080 To whatever.

00:13:34.280 Mirrors would burn it up.

00:13:35.500 Now, mirrors would be adjustable

00:13:38.140 so that you would be able

00:13:40.220 to adjust the reflectivity of the mirrors

00:13:43.140 for whatever you were trying to accomplish.

00:13:46.280 So you would be able to take down

00:13:47.800 the reflectivity or take it up,

00:13:49.760 possibly with nets or some kind of screen,

00:13:53.380 maybe with technology, I don't know.

00:13:55.640 But now let's take it to the next level.

00:13:58.340 Imagine if this trenching device

00:14:00.640 was also an enormous robot

00:14:03.800 because, remember,

00:14:05.240 it's got a nuclear-powered engine

00:14:07.060 so it can do anything until it breaks.

00:14:10.480 And it's got big arms

00:14:12.200 and it's creating bricks out of the dirt

00:14:14.640 so it's building the walls as it goes

00:14:16.660 and reinforcing it.

00:14:17.620 But on the back of the machine as it goes,

00:14:20.720 it's also creating,

00:14:22.080 it's a big robot that's creating the roof.

00:14:25.180 And you just take that out there

00:14:27.940 and you turn it on

00:14:29.560 and it just creates infinite trenched farm stuff.

00:14:37.060 And it would, you know,

00:14:37.780 you'd probably have to add in your own irrigation

00:14:41.780 and some other stuff.

00:14:43.200 But it can do that too.

00:14:44.540 So you can imagine a giant robot

00:14:46.340 that effectively was building

00:14:48.920 a farming trench for any community.

00:14:55.120 You know, just keep on going.

00:14:57.100 And people could just build houses

00:14:58.620 near where the trench is.

00:15:00.960 You know, build a house and wait a year

00:15:02.600 and everybody's got food.

00:15:05.060 Now, could you do the same thing

00:15:07.800 with fish farms?

00:15:12.520 Is there a way to have a giant robot,

00:15:15.820 nuclear-powered, of course,

00:15:17.240 that a giant robot

00:15:19.600 that would make fish farms?

00:15:22.720 Because I don't think it costs much

00:15:24.480 to add the fish, you know,

00:15:28.200 the fish eggs, right?

00:15:30.380 So the product doesn't cost much.

00:15:32.220 It probably just costs a lot

00:15:33.320 to create the facility, I would imagine.

00:15:35.780 I would think that's where all the expenses, right?

00:15:38.260 So could you take the cost of that now?

00:15:41.620 Anyway, I think that you're going to see

00:15:43.400 stuff like that in the future.

00:15:44.260 Why can't we tell good news from bad news?

00:15:49.420 How can I make this story about the economy

00:15:51.800 more about Elon Musk?

00:15:55.260 Okay, I got it.

00:15:56.900 There's an Elon Musk quote

00:15:58.420 talking about the upcoming probable recession,

00:16:02.780 everybody's saying,

00:16:03.640 all the smart people are saying,

00:16:05.480 but the administration is saying,

00:16:07.120 not necessarily.

00:16:08.960 Not necessarily.

00:16:10.560 Not guaranteed.

00:16:12.280 But all the smart people

00:16:13.360 are saying it looks like a recession is coming.

00:16:16.660 And Elon Musk tweeted this.

00:16:20.080 This is actually a good thing.

00:16:22.640 It has been raining money on fools for too long.

00:16:26.300 Some bankruptcies need to happen.

00:16:28.500 Also, all the COVID stay-at-home stuff

00:16:30.960 has tricked people into thinking

00:16:32.400 that you don't actually need to work hard.

00:16:34.240 Rude Awakening inbound.

00:16:37.780 Now, I agree with every word of that.

00:16:42.060 Now, the reason that this seems

00:16:44.500 sort of shocking in newsmaking

00:16:46.540 is that he just takes the emotion out of it.

00:16:50.040 If you just take all the romanticism

00:16:52.140 out of everything,

00:16:54.780 here it is.

00:16:55.540 It is absolutely, necessarily true

00:16:59.940 that we had to suck some of the excess

00:17:04.060 out of the system.

00:17:06.060 So, we as humans actually can't tell the difference

00:17:09.800 between good news and bad news.

00:17:12.200 Mark Twain said something like that.

00:17:14.340 And here's the perfect example.

00:17:18.120 You remember what I told you?

00:17:19.280 The stock market was pulling back

00:17:21.260 and, you know, it looked like a,

00:17:24.500 you know, there was some bubbles

00:17:25.840 were going to pop.

00:17:27.540 And I told you,

00:17:29.040 same thing Elon Musk said.

00:17:30.860 You have to have that.

00:17:32.300 So, it's sort of like having dentistry.

00:17:35.280 Is it bad news that dentistry got invented?

00:17:39.240 Because it really hurts to go to the dentist.

00:17:41.400 No, it's good news.

00:17:42.740 It's good news.

00:17:43.780 Modern dentistry just got invented.

00:17:45.900 So, this is sort of like modern dentistry.

00:17:48.200 It's like the pain that your economy has to have,

00:17:52.220 but it has to have it.

00:17:53.920 If it's something you have to have,

00:17:56.240 in order to, basically,

00:17:58.160 nothing would work if you didn't have it.

00:18:00.300 If you didn't have the pullbacks,

00:18:02.100 the whole thing would, you know,

00:18:03.220 just, you know,

00:18:04.800 hurtle out of control.

00:18:07.480 So, we really can't tell the difference

00:18:09.440 between good news and bad news.

00:18:10.980 But, we can tell that it's going to hurt for a while.

00:18:14.380 Like, sometimes dentistry.

00:18:18.200 So, here's all the smart economists saying,

00:18:22.940 so, Larry Summers,

00:18:24.820 now, I warn you that economists are not great

00:18:27.960 at predicting the future.

00:18:30.480 It's also their only job.

00:18:35.280 That's one of the things that discouraged me about economics.

00:18:38.480 If you think about it,

00:18:40.240 the only point of understanding economics,

00:18:43.020 the only point,

00:18:44.880 is so you can predict what's going to happen next.

00:18:47.160 Do you know what economists can't do?

00:18:51.080 Eh, they're not really good

00:18:52.020 at predicting what happens next.

00:18:54.080 And it's their only point.

00:18:56.400 They don't have any other purpose.

00:18:58.560 And they can't do the thing that they exist to do.

00:19:01.780 Tell you what's going to happen next.

00:19:04.160 All right.

00:19:04.520 The best you can do is diversify.

00:19:07.680 Because, well, all right.

00:19:10.380 So, finance, of course,

00:19:11.460 is slightly different than economics.

00:19:13.020 But you get the point.

00:19:15.640 So, the economists are telling us

00:19:17.660 that you'd need something like a 5% jobless rate

00:19:20.260 for five years

00:19:21.260 to get past the inflation.

00:19:28.480 So, we're at 3.6% now,

00:19:31.980 which is sort of a really, really good point.

00:19:35.260 5% is not terrible.

00:19:42.140 Right?

00:19:43.180 Because right now,

00:19:44.220 we have tons of, you know,

00:19:46.260 help wanted signs.

00:19:47.280 Everywhere I go,

00:19:48.220 there's help wanted.

00:19:49.460 Still.

00:19:50.300 You know, even though we're anticipating

00:19:51.900 the recession.

00:19:53.320 I have a feeling

00:19:54.480 that 5% unemployment

00:19:59.300 won't feel like it might have

00:20:01.740 at some other time.

00:20:02.700 I feel like we're not going to notice.

00:20:06.240 It's almost like

00:20:07.200 what we have to absorb

00:20:08.760 in unemployment

00:20:11.420 will just be that

00:20:14.320 the people in, you know,

00:20:15.680 the hardest jobs

00:20:16.480 to find employment, I guess,

00:20:18.460 whatever that is

00:20:19.640 during that time,

00:20:20.640 will probably have to, you know,

00:20:22.060 work a little harder

00:20:22.980 or change professions.

00:20:25.700 But probably we'll adjust.

00:20:29.520 So, it feels like

00:20:30.340 the kind of problem

00:20:30.980 that will be crushing

00:20:32.200 for some number of people

00:20:33.680 but not necessarily

00:20:35.700 anybody you know.

00:20:38.120 I mean, it could be

00:20:38.700 the kind of problem

00:20:39.360 that's so, you know,

00:20:41.320 distributed.

00:20:42.100 The difference between

00:20:42.860 3.6% employment

00:20:44.940 and 5%

00:20:46.940 in a context

00:20:48.700 where there are plenty of signs

00:20:50.420 that say help needed

00:20:51.540 and things are breaking

00:20:53.640 because there aren't enough

00:20:54.600 people to work.

00:20:56.360 I don't know.

00:20:56.960 It just doesn't look like

00:20:59.420 this is a hard solution.

00:21:01.840 It's one of these things

00:21:02.840 where it looks impossible

00:21:04.300 at first

00:21:04.960 but then you say to yourself,

00:21:07.920 well, you know,

00:21:09.100 suppose we had

00:21:10.240 5% inflation

00:21:11.540 for five years.

00:21:14.480 That would take down

00:21:15.480 the debt quite a bit.

00:21:17.600 You know,

00:21:18.100 you wouldn't like it.

00:21:19.340 Suppose we had

00:21:20.000 5% unemployment

00:21:21.520 for five years.

00:21:23.000 Would you notice?

00:21:26.540 I don't know.

00:21:27.660 It's almost

00:21:28.420 small enough

00:21:30.400 that it might be

00:21:31.240 something most of you

00:21:32.420 didn't notice

00:21:33.160 but some of you

00:21:34.680 would be crushed by it

00:21:35.680 because you just

00:21:36.440 couldn't get another job.

00:21:38.820 I don't know.

00:21:39.440 I wonder about that.

00:21:41.460 Nuclear energy,

00:21:42.580 we've got a golden age

00:21:43.420 coming.

00:21:43.880 The company

00:21:44.520 NuScale

00:21:45.300 and you

00:21:46.040 scale.

00:21:47.780 So they've been

00:21:48.660 developing these

00:21:49.400 small modular

00:21:50.260 nuclear reactors.

00:21:51.840 I think the idea

00:21:52.660 is you build them

00:21:53.280 in a factory

00:21:53.900 and you build them

00:21:55.180 all the same way

00:21:55.940 so they're all approved

00:21:57.120 and you don't have

00:21:58.140 to go through

00:21:58.480 that lengthy approval

00:21:59.400 process.

00:22:00.980 And then you put them

00:22:01.580 on trucks

00:22:02.260 or however you

00:22:03.060 transport them,

00:22:04.000 whatever it takes

00:22:04.900 to move them.

00:22:06.520 And you get

00:22:08.300 lots of economic gains

00:22:10.040 and safety gains

00:22:11.260 and speed gains

00:22:14.060 and basically

00:22:14.800 every kind of gain

00:22:16.000 you would want

00:22:16.760 you would get

00:22:18.100 onto this model.

00:22:19.300 And the news is

00:22:20.080 that they're moving

00:22:20.720 to commercialize it now.

00:22:22.660 So they're

00:22:23.600 starting their

00:22:24.460 divisions that will

00:22:25.360 be selling

00:22:26.220 and supporting it.

00:22:27.820 So they're actually

00:22:28.700 moving out of R&D

00:22:30.100 into commercialization.

00:22:32.920 Now they're not

00:22:33.300 quite there

00:22:33.860 so maybe they're

00:22:35.180 a little bit ahead

00:22:35.820 of it but they need

00:22:36.520 to have the

00:22:37.540 infrastructure there

00:22:38.360 when they're ready.

00:22:39.360 So they must be

00:22:40.120 close enough

00:22:40.860 that they've got

00:22:42.060 to build the

00:22:42.500 infrastructure.

00:22:44.320 This is the sort

00:22:45.320 of story we're

00:22:45.940 hearing almost

00:22:46.460 every day now.

00:22:48.280 Almost every day

00:22:49.140 we're hearing

00:22:49.580 Rolls-Royce

00:22:51.340 is going to be

00:22:51.920 creating small

00:22:52.600 nuclear reactors.

00:22:54.500 We're hearing

00:22:55.000 that China is

00:22:56.000 developing some

00:22:56.820 new nuclear

00:22:57.820 reactor technology.

00:22:59.280 It's just on

00:23:00.900 fire right now.

00:23:02.980 And do you know

00:23:03.420 the reason why?

00:23:05.200 Because it's

00:23:05.960 literally the only

00:23:06.700 solution.

00:23:09.820 Climate change

00:23:10.980 as well as just

00:23:12.000 having enough

00:23:12.620 electricity without

00:23:13.700 polluting the world,

00:23:15.020 there's literally

00:23:15.760 only one solution.

00:23:18.040 And the

00:23:18.540 interesting thing

00:23:19.160 was that for a

00:23:22.020 long time it

00:23:23.260 hasn't been a

00:23:23.860 technical problem.

00:23:25.500 For a long time

00:23:26.400 it's been a

00:23:27.480 persuasion problem.

00:23:30.620 And I actually

00:23:31.960 feel pretty happy

00:23:32.900 that all of us

00:23:35.440 were on the right

00:23:36.100 side of history

00:23:36.720 on this.

00:23:37.900 And that many

00:23:39.120 of us participated.

00:23:40.340 I know I put a

00:23:41.600 lot of effort

00:23:42.200 into persuading

00:23:44.060 people to simply

00:23:45.100 understand that

00:23:45.760 that it's not

00:23:47.440 their grandfather's

00:23:48.460 nuclear energy

00:23:49.280 market yet.

00:23:51.180 The Schellenbergers,

00:23:52.780 Mark Schneider,

00:23:56.180 you know,

00:23:56.560 a number of

00:23:57.380 people who

00:23:58.420 were, you

00:23:59.380 know, hugely

00:23:59.900 helpful.

00:24:01.400 And Schellenberger

00:24:02.160 being probably

00:24:03.340 the top of that

00:24:04.020 pile.

00:24:05.720 So, just

00:24:07.300 think about it.

00:24:07.960 You were

00:24:08.460 probably, at

00:24:09.800 least in a

00:24:10.160 small part,

00:24:11.020 part of something

00:24:11.840 that really

00:24:12.500 changed civilization.

00:24:14.240 the persuasion

00:24:16.140 element of

00:24:16.940 moving to

00:24:17.420 nuclear.

00:24:19.440 All right.

00:24:22.660 Here are two

00:24:23.600 takes on

00:24:24.160 inflation

00:24:24.720 that are

00:24:27.620 opposites.

00:24:29.120 So, Ian

00:24:29.640 Bremmer tweeted

00:24:30.540 that there are

00:24:33.340 several governments,

00:24:34.380 he named them,

00:24:34.980 and they all have

00:24:35.500 high inflations.

00:24:36.840 So, the U.S.,

00:24:37.660 the U.K.,

00:24:38.260 Germany, and

00:24:38.860 Italy all have

00:24:39.600 high inflation.

00:24:40.100 And he said

00:24:41.680 that they have

00:24:42.140 different forms

00:24:42.820 of government,

00:24:43.540 and people argued,

00:24:44.520 oh, they're all

00:24:45.300 kind of leftists,

00:24:47.160 blah, blah, blah.

00:24:47.840 But the point was

00:24:48.860 that Ian Bremmer

00:24:50.240 gave four examples

00:24:51.940 of modern economies

00:24:53.380 that all have

00:24:54.580 high inflation.

00:24:56.300 So, as he says,

00:24:58.320 he finishes his tweet,

00:24:59.620 wild gas is not

00:25:00.700 the government's.

00:25:02.040 So, it's not

00:25:02.460 the form of government,

00:25:03.600 it's there's

00:25:04.420 something in the

00:25:04.980 world that's

00:25:06.560 causing inflation

00:25:07.320 in lots of places.

00:25:08.880 not to be

00:25:11.040 undone,

00:25:11.740 Sean Spicer

00:25:12.640 tweeted that

00:25:15.700 the following

00:25:16.300 countries,

00:25:18.160 so this is a

00:25:18.840 Sean Spicer tweet,

00:25:19.800 he said,

00:25:20.860 I think this is

00:25:23.600 a Biden quote,

00:25:25.320 if it's my fault,

00:25:26.540 Biden said,

00:25:27.380 why is it the

00:25:28.280 case that in

00:25:28.800 every other

00:25:29.260 major industrial

00:25:29.940 country in the

00:25:30.660 world that

00:25:31.140 inflation is higher?

00:25:33.260 And then Sean

00:25:33.860 Spicer points out

00:25:35.240 that the inflation

00:25:36.220 in the U.S.

00:25:36.740 is 8.6,

00:25:37.640 but Canada

00:25:39.200 has 6.8,

00:25:41.380 France is 5.2,

00:25:42.740 Switzerland is 2.9,

00:25:44.160 Japan 2.5,

00:25:45.580 Saudi Arabia 2.2,

00:25:47.560 China 2.1.

00:25:50.300 Now, who's right?

00:25:53.400 Because they both

00:25:54.300 gave their examples.

00:25:56.940 Ian Bremmer shows

00:25:57.880 that several major

00:25:58.820 industrial countries

00:25:59.760 have inflation,

00:26:01.040 and they're, you know,

00:26:01.600 different forms of

00:26:02.360 government, or at

00:26:03.120 least different people

00:26:03.940 running them.

00:26:04.560 So, that would

00:26:06.740 suggest there's

00:26:07.380 something international

00:26:08.440 happening, but yet

00:26:10.340 is it also true

00:26:12.040 that there are

00:26:13.700 several major

00:26:14.640 economies that

00:26:15.660 have much less

00:26:17.100 of a problem?

00:26:19.380 Yeah, and the

00:26:20.060 answer is both,

00:26:21.040 right?

00:26:21.500 They're probably

00:26:21.880 both true.

00:26:22.920 It's a mixed bag.

00:26:24.880 So, it's something

00:26:25.860 about what we've

00:26:26.560 done and something

00:26:27.660 about the world

00:26:28.400 at the same time.

00:26:31.180 So, that would

00:26:32.180 account for everything,

00:26:32.920 basically.

00:26:35.300 So, Rasmussen has

00:26:38.180 some new polling

00:26:39.240 on Biden.

00:26:40.560 Only 27% of likely

00:26:42.220 U.S. voters rate

00:26:43.600 Biden excellent or

00:26:44.600 good for handling

00:26:45.420 the economy.

00:26:46.940 27.

00:26:48.200 27.

00:26:49.480 That's about,

00:26:51.260 that's 27%.

00:26:52.220 That's almost a

00:26:53.000 quarter.

00:26:54.440 It's a little more

00:26:55.020 than a quarter,

00:26:55.660 actually.

00:26:56.020 Not almost.

00:26:56.720 It's a little more

00:26:57.200 than a quarter.

00:26:58.340 A quarter is like

00:26:58.980 25% of the public.

00:27:00.600 25.

00:27:01.700 25.

00:27:02.100 Huh.

00:27:05.260 All right.

00:27:05.700 Inside joke alert

00:27:06.620 for those of you

00:27:08.040 who do not understand

00:27:09.040 what's happening

00:27:09.580 right now.

00:27:10.780 This is an inside

00:27:11.660 joke.

00:27:13.140 The subject of

00:27:14.260 the inside joke

00:27:15.020 is that 25%

00:27:16.880 of the public

00:27:17.600 gets every

00:27:19.340 question wrong.

00:27:21.400 Doesn't matter

00:27:22.040 what the question

00:27:22.580 is.

00:27:23.500 Sometimes it's a

00:27:24.360 left-leaning question,

00:27:25.160 sometimes a right-leaning

00:27:25.920 question, but 25%

00:27:27.680 of the public

00:27:28.200 gets every question

00:27:29.780 wrong.

00:27:30.120 It's an exaggeration,

00:27:34.180 but it's a fun one.

00:27:36.260 And Biden's rating

00:27:39.320 is down from 32%

00:27:40.880 in December.

00:27:42.880 And 57%

00:27:44.220 now give Biden

00:27:45.420 a poor rating

00:27:46.020 for his handling

00:27:46.520 of the economy.

00:27:48.440 Now, that's not

00:27:49.460 really something

00:27:49.980 you would want

00:27:50.540 to run for

00:27:51.080 re-election on.

00:27:51.960 But who thinks

00:27:55.880 this is more

00:27:56.960 interesting?

00:27:58.060 This is also

00:27:58.640 Rasmussen.

00:27:59.460 And who's to blame?

00:28:01.540 So people were

00:28:02.280 polled on who's

00:28:03.000 to blame for

00:28:03.820 the rising fuel

00:28:05.940 costs.

00:28:06.680 Only 29% of

00:28:08.080 voters think it's

00:28:08.780 the oil companies

00:28:09.700 bear most

00:28:10.720 responsibility.

00:28:12.600 And only 11%

00:28:14.020 say Putin.

00:28:15.020 Huh.

00:28:15.180 So it seems

00:28:17.160 that the

00:28:19.320 Biden administration

00:28:20.620 play that it's

00:28:22.120 Putin,

00:28:22.840 only 11%

00:28:23.820 are buying

00:28:24.900 their propaganda.

00:28:26.220 So that means

00:28:26.760 even most of the

00:28:27.500 people who are

00:28:28.220 Democrats are

00:28:28.960 saying,

00:28:30.440 okay, that's

00:28:32.140 too far.

00:28:33.400 Let me get this

00:28:34.060 straight.

00:28:34.360 I have this

00:28:35.960 image in my

00:28:37.000 head of

00:28:37.880 millions and

00:28:38.580 millions of

00:28:39.220 Democrats

00:28:39.760 hearing Biden

00:28:40.960 blame inflation

00:28:42.120 on Putin and

00:28:43.080 saying, okay,

00:28:45.200 I'm starting to

00:28:45.900 see a pattern.

00:28:47.320 I'm starting to

00:28:47.940 see a pattern.

00:28:49.240 When Hillary

00:28:50.120 was in office,

00:28:50.940 she was going

00:28:51.400 after Putin.

00:28:53.240 When Trump

00:28:54.240 ran, Hillary

00:28:55.620 and her gang

00:28:56.980 blamed Trump's

00:28:59.920 election victory

00:29:00.900 on Putin.

00:29:01.900 Putin is

00:29:04.560 the one who

00:29:05.000 hacked everything

00:29:05.940 and Putin

00:29:07.160 and it's

00:29:09.180 all Putin,

00:29:09.820 isn't it?

00:29:11.280 Does it seem

00:29:12.060 to you that

00:29:13.400 the Democrats

00:29:13.960 have only one

00:29:14.900 play?

00:29:17.360 What would

00:29:18.480 the Democrats

00:29:19.040 be without

00:29:19.720 Putin?

00:29:22.120 They wouldn't

00:29:23.180 have anything,

00:29:24.260 would they?

00:29:25.600 Like, who

00:29:26.220 would they

00:29:26.520 blame if

00:29:27.100 they're not

00:29:27.460 blaming Putin

00:29:28.500 for something?

00:29:29.880 Because they

00:29:30.400 always get the

00:29:31.080 double dip.

00:29:33.220 I saw a video

00:29:34.860 of Max Boot,

00:29:37.180 Democrat,

00:29:38.180 saying that

00:29:39.140 the war in

00:29:39.720 Ukraine is

00:29:40.560 our war.

00:29:42.080 And the

00:29:42.380 reason it's

00:29:42.760 our war is

00:29:44.420 that the war

00:29:44.920 in Ukraine is

00:29:46.480 a war about

00:29:47.300 the international

00:29:48.340 rule of law.

00:29:50.580 And if we

00:29:51.100 let the rule

00:29:51.880 of law and

00:29:53.460 the international

00:29:54.620 order be

00:29:55.820 upset, that's

00:29:57.040 on us.

00:29:58.540 That's personal.

00:29:59.400 So we are

00:30:00.860 being attacked

00:30:01.540 by Russia.

00:30:02.620 Because when

00:30:03.060 Russia attacks

00:30:03.740 the international

00:30:04.420 order, well,

00:30:06.000 we're part of

00:30:06.540 that.

00:30:07.320 So really,

00:30:08.140 Russia has

00:30:08.640 attacked us,

00:30:09.560 so we're at

00:30:10.680 war with

00:30:11.080 Russia.

00:30:12.400 That's what

00:30:13.200 Max fucking

00:30:14.080 Boot said in

00:30:15.180 public.

00:30:16.540 Now,

00:30:17.620 why do the

00:30:19.600 Democrats have

00:30:20.260 such a hard

00:30:21.800 on about

00:30:22.340 Putin?

00:30:23.980 It's almost

00:30:26.320 like there's

00:30:26.820 something to

00:30:27.300 the story

00:30:27.840 that you

00:30:28.220 don't

00:30:28.420 understand.

00:30:29.940 Did Putin

00:30:31.220 steal somebody's

00:30:33.000 girlfriend or

00:30:33.860 something?

00:30:35.380 Like, I feel

00:30:36.360 like the

00:30:37.380 things that we

00:30:38.020 observe about

00:30:38.780 Russia are

00:30:39.520 plenty terrible.

00:30:41.260 I'll give you

00:30:41.960 that.

00:30:42.340 Plenty terrible.

00:30:44.160 But it feels

00:30:44.920 like there's

00:30:45.340 some other

00:30:46.240 thing going

00:30:46.960 on.

00:30:48.040 Like you

00:30:48.740 would almost

00:30:49.160 have to know

00:30:49.920 some backstory

00:30:51.520 to even

00:30:51.960 understand why

00:30:52.820 they have such

00:30:54.680 a Putin

00:30:55.520 obsession.

00:30:57.220 Doesn't it

00:30:57.720 feel personal?

00:30:58.860 It actually

00:30:59.360 just feels

00:30:59.840 personal on

00:31:00.460 some level.

00:31:01.540 Like the

00:31:02.160 Clintons and

00:31:02.820 Putin have

00:31:03.640 some kind

00:31:04.060 of thing

00:31:04.980 going on?

00:31:05.660 I don't

00:31:05.860 know.

00:31:06.940 What is it?

00:31:08.440 Did Bill

00:31:08.900 Clinton sleep

00:31:10.220 with Putin's

00:31:10.880 mistress?

00:31:12.340 Caused a

00:31:12.780 problem?

00:31:14.000 Just guessing?

00:31:14.820 I don't

00:31:15.020 know.

00:31:19.100 Here's an

00:31:19.720 update on

00:31:20.260 the 2,000

00:31:21.100 mules video.

00:31:22.820 So I

00:31:24.040 teasingly

00:31:24.880 tweeted that

00:31:26.160 if it turns

00:31:27.300 out that

00:31:27.720 all those

00:31:28.240 alleged 2,000

00:31:29.120 mules do

00:31:30.680 not show up

00:31:31.380 on any

00:31:31.760 videos,

00:31:33.180 the only

00:31:35.320 explanation I

00:31:36.200 can think

00:31:36.580 of is

00:31:36.960 invisibility

00:31:37.800 cloaks.

00:31:39.060 And if the

00:31:39.460 2,000 mules

00:31:40.420 have invisibility

00:31:42.400 cloaks,

00:31:43.640 whatever the

00:31:44.400 problem here

00:31:45.040 is, it's

00:31:46.180 way worse

00:31:46.860 than you

00:31:47.160 thought.

00:31:48.440 Because they've

00:31:49.260 got invisibility

00:31:50.180 cloaks.

00:31:50.680 so I'm

00:31:53.200 a little

00:31:53.540 worried that

00:31:54.720 this mule

00:31:55.240 story could

00:31:56.600 be even

00:31:57.080 bigger.

00:31:58.880 I mean,

00:31:59.320 we'd be

00:31:59.620 talking alien

00:32:00.440 invasion,

00:32:01.800 possibly we'd

00:32:03.320 be finding out

00:32:04.040 that we're

00:32:04.460 muggles,

00:32:05.900 and wouldn't

00:32:06.340 that suck?

00:32:07.580 You just

00:32:08.200 found out

00:32:08.620 you're a

00:32:08.960 muggle.

00:32:09.700 What?

00:32:10.740 You're a

00:32:11.320 muggle.

00:32:11.980 I don't

00:32:12.340 even know

00:32:12.580 what that

00:32:12.860 word means.

00:32:14.140 Watch a

00:32:14.620 movie, read

00:32:15.120 a book.

00:32:16.520 What's a

00:32:16.980 muggle?

00:32:17.220 So I

00:32:22.580 said that

00:32:23.040 because it's

00:32:24.120 been a

00:32:24.480 while since

00:32:24.920 we had an

00:32:25.380 update,

00:32:26.560 because

00:32:27.160 Dinesh

00:32:28.120 D'Souza,

00:32:29.120 the producer

00:32:29.840 of the

00:32:30.720 movie,

00:32:31.400 had promised

00:32:32.380 that they're

00:32:32.800 looking into

00:32:33.440 getting some

00:32:34.680 video evidence

00:32:35.640 or some

00:32:36.280 other

00:32:36.540 corroborating

00:32:37.600 evidence.

00:32:38.320 Because the

00:32:38.700 movie is

00:32:39.040 based on

00:32:39.480 the primary

00:32:40.700 evidence,

00:32:41.260 the GPS

00:32:42.140 information that

00:32:44.260 looks like

00:32:44.660 there were a

00:32:45.140 certain number

00:32:45.580 of people who

00:32:46.200 were next to

00:32:46.740 ballot boxes a

00:32:48.620 ridiculous number

00:32:49.720 of times.

00:32:50.940 More than

00:32:51.680 ten times in

00:32:52.820 some period,

00:32:54.300 and also went

00:32:55.160 between some

00:32:56.140 other specific

00:33:00.120 sites.

00:33:01.580 So the

00:33:03.260 data is very

00:33:03.940 compelling, or

00:33:04.800 let's say the

00:33:05.800 documentary is

00:33:06.660 very compelling.

00:33:08.160 If you watch

00:33:09.280 it without

00:33:10.660 context, you'd

00:33:12.240 say to

00:33:12.500 yourself,

00:33:13.520 if this GPS

00:33:15.300 data is

00:33:15.900 accurate,

00:33:16.740 they've

00:33:17.720 definitely got

00:33:18.420 some kind

00:33:19.220 of almost

00:33:20.520 smoking gun

00:33:21.540 situation here.

00:33:23.740 But most

00:33:25.260 of us would

00:33:25.760 say you

00:33:26.560 need just

00:33:27.560 like a

00:33:28.200 little more

00:33:28.760 because you're

00:33:30.840 still in the

00:33:31.380 realm of

00:33:31.820 something that

00:33:32.360 could be

00:33:32.900 explained by

00:33:33.480 something else.

00:33:34.940 The data is

00:33:35.840 wrong, or

00:33:36.760 there are

00:33:39.060 different ways

00:33:39.620 to analyze the

00:33:40.660 data.

00:33:40.980 there are

00:33:42.200 some people

00:33:42.640 whose job

00:33:43.220 it is, like

00:33:43.900 bicycle

00:33:44.400 messengers or

00:33:45.440 something, that

00:33:46.580 they always go

00:33:47.660 into the

00:33:48.080 same address.

00:33:50.600 It could be

00:33:51.140 like a bicycle

00:33:52.460 messenger who

00:33:53.380 went to the

00:33:54.140 same office

00:33:56.000 building ten

00:33:56.720 times.

00:33:57.800 And each

00:33:58.240 time he

00:33:58.820 leaned his

00:33:59.900 bicycle against

00:34:00.840 the bicycle

00:34:03.380 lock place

00:34:06.040 that's next

00:34:06.540 to the

00:34:07.040 you'd have

00:34:09.120 to have

00:34:09.360 lots of

00:34:09.780 millions and

00:34:10.300 millions of

00:34:10.680 people doing

00:34:11.180 millions and

00:34:11.680 millions of

00:34:12.020 things, but

00:34:13.340 you would end

00:34:14.540 up with lots

00:34:15.160 of coincidences

00:34:15.900 that you

00:34:16.300 didn't understand.

00:34:18.260 Now, let me

00:34:19.460 be clear.

00:34:20.320 I'm not saying

00:34:20.980 that that

00:34:21.360 example is a

00:34:22.200 good one.

00:34:23.600 That's not a

00:34:24.360 good example.

00:34:25.300 I'm just trying

00:34:25.900 to open your

00:34:26.660 mind to this

00:34:27.660 concept.

00:34:28.140 If you

00:34:29.240 can't imagine

00:34:30.220 another

00:34:30.960 explanation for

00:34:32.420 that GPS

00:34:33.040 data, there

00:34:35.420 are two

00:34:35.680 reasons for

00:34:36.240 that.

00:34:37.560 One would

00:34:38.700 be it's

00:34:39.100 exactly what

00:34:39.720 it looks

00:34:39.980 like.

00:34:40.720 It looks

00:34:41.100 like a

00:34:41.400 bunch of

00:34:41.700 mules were

00:34:42.760 delivering too

00:34:43.900 many ballots

00:34:44.380 to too many

00:34:44.940 ballot boxes,

00:34:45.940 and it's

00:34:46.300 suspicious.

00:34:47.380 That is one

00:34:47.980 explanation.

00:34:49.880 Do we

00:34:50.520 agree on

00:34:50.880 that?

00:34:51.800 The video

00:34:52.680 absolutely,

00:34:55.020 you know,

00:34:55.240 there were

00:34:55.520 the 2,000

00:34:57.000 mules that

00:34:57.820 movie,

00:34:59.640 absolutely is

00:35:00.660 consistent with

00:35:01.620 that interpretation.

00:35:03.440 But, is it

00:35:04.660 the only one?

00:35:06.400 Because the

00:35:06.960 other interpretation

00:35:07.760 is the one

00:35:08.240 that is most

00:35:09.000 often the one

00:35:10.700 in these

00:35:11.320 situations.

00:35:13.260 What is the

00:35:14.460 most often

00:35:15.240 explanation in

00:35:17.940 these situations?

00:35:20.140 And I'm

00:35:20.460 saying these

00:35:20.960 situations, not

00:35:21.780 about voting,

00:35:23.200 but about where

00:35:24.060 you've got some

00:35:24.700 data that suggests

00:35:25.720 something, just

00:35:26.700 in general.

00:35:28.540 Data that

00:35:29.200 suggests something

00:35:29.880 and you don't

00:35:30.340 know what the

00:35:30.680 answer is.

00:35:31.600 So you say,

00:35:32.040 well, there's

00:35:32.260 only one answer.

00:35:33.100 There's some

00:35:33.780 crime here.

00:35:34.880 What's the

00:35:35.440 most usual

00:35:36.600 thing that you

00:35:37.380 find out later?

00:35:39.640 There was

00:35:40.160 something you

00:35:40.580 didn't imagine.

00:35:42.720 Yeah.

00:35:43.240 It turns out

00:35:43.940 we're terrible

00:35:44.480 at imagining

00:35:45.080 stuff.

00:35:45.520 if you give

00:35:47.560 me that same

00:35:48.260 set of data

00:35:48.960 and you say,

00:35:50.800 all right, I'm

00:35:51.320 going to take

00:35:51.760 the most

00:35:52.820 creative, smart,

00:35:54.620 experienced people

00:35:55.480 I know, and I'm

00:35:56.800 going to put them

00:35:57.220 in a room, and

00:35:58.460 we're going to

00:35:58.840 brainstorm all

00:35:59.840 the ways that

00:36:00.520 that data could

00:36:01.260 look that way

00:36:02.020 that are

00:36:04.300 legitimate.

00:36:05.860 How many do

00:36:06.600 you think we'd

00:36:07.080 come up with?

00:36:08.080 I don't know.

00:36:09.460 Because I'm

00:36:11.060 not a room full

00:36:12.120 of the smartest,

00:36:12.920 most creative

00:36:13.400 person.

00:36:13.860 I'm just one

00:36:14.320 person.

00:36:15.160 But if you put

00:36:15.780 the smartest,

00:36:16.520 most creative

00:36:17.000 people in the

00:36:18.000 room, even

00:36:19.120 with Dinesh's

00:36:20.480 very strict

00:36:21.380 criteria for

00:36:22.220 the data, that

00:36:23.460 it had to be

00:36:23.840 the same box

00:36:24.720 within a certain

00:36:25.440 time period,

00:36:26.700 like, I think,

00:36:27.440 ten times,

00:36:29.040 which is a

00:36:29.660 ridiculously high

00:36:30.760 standard.

00:36:32.180 So I think

00:36:33.240 we'd agree that

00:36:34.040 the standard

00:36:35.280 feels high

00:36:35.940 enough.

00:36:36.960 I mean,

00:36:37.260 common sense

00:36:37.840 says that

00:36:38.840 seems like a

00:36:39.460 pretty good

00:36:39.820 standard.

00:36:41.340 But how

00:36:42.440 good is our

00:36:43.020 common sense?

00:36:44.420 Terrible.

00:36:45.500 Our common

00:36:45.920 sense is

00:36:46.320 terrible.

00:36:46.980 The most

00:36:47.540 likely explanation

00:36:48.720 for anything

00:36:49.640 you can't

00:36:50.280 explain is

00:36:52.280 not going

00:36:52.660 to be

00:36:52.860 Bigfoot.

00:36:55.340 It's not

00:36:56.120 going to be

00:36:57.380 an extraordinary,

00:37:00.440 complicated scheme

00:37:02.000 with no

00:37:02.840 witnesses coming

00:37:03.680 forward and no

00:37:04.480 whistleblowers.

00:37:05.740 Because that

00:37:06.360 would be sort

00:37:06.820 of an unusual

00:37:07.560 situation.

00:37:09.300 It's possible,

00:37:10.540 completely

00:37:11.160 consistent with

00:37:11.920 the data,

00:37:12.680 but it would

00:37:13.340 be unusual.

00:37:14.460 It would be

00:37:14.940 counter to

00:37:16.120 what you

00:37:16.420 would expect

00:37:16.920 in this

00:37:17.260 situation.

00:37:20.060 So,

00:37:20.660 would you

00:37:22.740 give me

00:37:23.120 this one

00:37:24.220 concession?

00:37:25.280 This is all

00:37:25.820 I'm going to

00:37:26.100 ask for.

00:37:27.680 I will agree

00:37:28.660 with you that

00:37:29.380 the 2000

00:37:30.620 mules video

00:37:31.560 and the

00:37:32.680 research they

00:37:33.320 did with the

00:37:33.760 GPS is

00:37:35.300 100%

00:37:36.220 consistent

00:37:36.840 with the

00:37:39.280 alleged

00:37:39.780 sketchy

00:37:40.560 behavior

00:37:41.000 that says

00:37:42.960 people were

00:37:43.460 stuffing ballot

00:37:44.120 boxes illegally.

00:37:47.500 Are we

00:37:48.140 good with

00:37:48.480 that?

00:37:49.740 That what it

00:37:50.340 shows is

00:37:50.880 completely

00:37:51.300 consistent with

00:37:51.980 that.

00:37:52.460 So,

00:37:52.840 certainly,

00:37:53.540 we would all

00:37:54.120 be interested

00:37:54.720 in finding out

00:37:55.540 if that's

00:37:55.960 really what's

00:37:56.500 happening.

00:37:57.600 So,

00:37:58.180 we're on the

00:37:58.540 same page on

00:37:59.080 that.

00:38:00.360 Right?

00:38:00.500 So,

00:38:00.940 we agree

00:38:01.340 more than

00:38:01.680 we disagree.

00:38:03.640 I'm just

00:38:04.240 saying that

00:38:04.740 you and I

00:38:05.260 would both

00:38:05.620 like to see

00:38:06.120 some video,

00:38:06.800 wouldn't we?

00:38:08.260 Wouldn't we?

00:38:09.240 Or at least

00:38:09.880 a mule or

00:38:11.360 two saying

00:38:12.780 that,

00:38:13.220 yeah,

00:38:13.700 you caught

00:38:15.100 me.

00:38:15.360 I'm the

00:38:15.680 one on

00:38:16.040 that GPS.

00:38:17.940 It would

00:38:18.840 only take

00:38:19.280 me one

00:38:20.140 convincing

00:38:21.100 whistleblower

00:38:21.980 who said,

00:38:23.500 yeah,

00:38:23.800 if you

00:38:24.200 looked at

00:38:24.620 which box

00:38:25.340 I went

00:38:25.740 to and

00:38:26.820 the times

00:38:27.260 I went

00:38:27.740 and you

00:38:28.260 look at

00:38:28.560 your data

00:38:29.040 on the

00:38:29.360 GPS,

00:38:29.900 that's me.

00:38:30.780 That's

00:38:31.260 actually my

00:38:31.800 phone.

00:38:32.720 I can

00:38:33.300 confirm

00:38:33.680 that.

00:38:36.040 Wouldn't

00:38:36.520 we all

00:38:36.820 want that?

00:38:37.840 I mean,

00:38:38.100 I think

00:38:38.460 Dinesh would

00:38:39.280 want that

00:38:39.680 too,

00:38:39.940 right?

00:38:40.580 So,

00:38:40.960 that's

00:38:41.100 something we

00:38:41.540 can all

00:38:41.900 agree on.

00:38:42.700 It hasn't

00:38:43.380 happened.

00:38:44.560 But the

00:38:45.020 only thing

00:38:45.380 I would

00:38:45.600 ask you

00:38:46.120 to modify

00:38:47.640 in your

00:38:48.040 thinking

00:38:48.400 is the

00:38:48.880 following.

00:38:50.360 If you

00:38:51.000 think that

00:38:51.520 because the

00:38:52.020 only thing

00:38:52.500 you can

00:38:52.960 imagine

00:38:53.760 is that

00:38:55.600 it was

00:38:56.000 mules,

00:38:57.780 just be

00:38:58.520 open to

00:38:59.040 the possibility

00:38:59.740 that your

00:39:02.900 imagination

00:39:03.360 is the

00:39:03.860 problem.

00:39:05.000 You just

00:39:05.320 can't

00:39:05.840 imagine

00:39:06.220 the other

00:39:06.940 possibilities.

00:39:09.440 That's

00:39:09.700 all.

00:39:11.940 Somebody's

00:39:12.500 saying

00:39:12.640 something

00:39:12.940 about

00:39:13.240 Yuma,

00:39:13.900 so there

00:39:14.200 may be,

00:39:14.600 is there

00:39:15.160 some

00:39:15.460 whistleblower

00:39:16.280 or somebody

00:39:17.060 got accused

00:39:17.600 of something

00:39:18.040 in Yuma?

00:39:19.160 Send me

00:39:19.720 that link

00:39:20.120 if there's

00:39:20.480 something I

00:39:20.860 missed.

00:39:21.120 all right.

00:39:26.380 Did you

00:39:26.640 hear about

00:39:27.040 that?

00:39:27.880 So Facebook

00:39:28.460 took down

00:39:29.060 a political

00:39:30.060 ad by a

00:39:30.860 Senate

00:39:31.060 candidate,

00:39:31.740 Eric

00:39:32.100 Greiton,

00:39:34.580 because it

00:39:35.160 showed him

00:39:35.720 and a bunch

00:39:37.380 of people

00:39:37.740 with weapons

00:39:38.920 going,

00:39:40.560 quote,

00:39:40.640 rhino

00:39:41.140 hunting.

00:39:41.940 Rhino as

00:39:42.680 in R-I-N-O,

00:39:44.160 as in

00:39:44.700 Republicans

00:39:46.160 in name

00:39:46.800 only,

00:39:47.320 as in

00:39:47.780 this is a

00:39:48.920 MAGA

00:39:49.300 supporter who

00:39:50.280 is saying

00:39:50.620 that he's

00:39:51.960 trying to

00:39:53.140 take down

00:39:53.700 the

00:39:54.020 Republicans,

00:39:55.460 the fellow

00:39:55.900 Republicans,

00:39:57.100 who are

00:39:57.600 not MAGA

00:39:58.900 enough.

00:40:00.880 Now,

00:40:01.580 somebody said

00:40:02.440 that I get

00:40:03.340 the wind

00:40:03.720 for predicting

00:40:05.760 that Republicans

00:40:06.560 would be

00:40:07.040 hunted if

00:40:07.620 Biden became

00:40:08.520 president.

00:40:09.320 Well,

00:40:09.700 this isn't

00:40:10.060 what I'm

00:40:10.400 talking about.

00:40:11.600 I wasn't

00:40:12.000 talking about

00:40:12.500 this.

00:40:14.660 No.

00:40:15.860 No.

00:40:16.600 I didn't

00:40:16.920 think Republicans

00:40:17.600 would hunt

00:40:18.020 each other.

00:40:18.500 You know,

00:40:21.020 trust me,

00:40:22.020 I love to

00:40:23.360 take credit

00:40:23.940 for anything

00:40:24.780 I get

00:40:25.160 right.

00:40:26.340 I think

00:40:26.780 you know

00:40:27.100 that.

00:40:28.440 But,

00:40:29.260 no,

00:40:29.600 I didn't

00:40:30.200 predict

00:40:30.540 Republicans

00:40:31.340 would hunt

00:40:31.860 each other.

00:40:32.500 That one

00:40:33.440 kind of,

00:40:34.320 I mean,

00:40:34.620 even in,

00:40:35.660 of course,

00:40:36.200 he was doing

00:40:36.600 it facetiously,

00:40:37.980 but it

00:40:39.080 is an

00:40:39.460 alarming

00:40:39.900 way to

00:40:42.280 make a

00:40:42.600 point.

00:40:43.860 But,

00:40:44.400 hey,

00:40:44.680 free speech.

00:40:45.200 I think

00:40:46.980 the way

00:40:47.280 Twitter handled

00:40:48.340 it was

00:40:48.680 better.

00:40:49.620 So,

00:40:49.820 Facebook

00:40:50.120 took it

00:40:50.580 down

00:40:50.940 because it

00:40:52.040 sort of

00:40:52.400 suggested

00:40:53.020 violence.

00:40:54.580 Not

00:40:55.060 suggested,

00:40:55.740 I mean,

00:40:56.620 even though

00:40:57.220 it was a

00:40:57.860 parody,

00:40:58.560 it wasn't

00:40:58.880 serious,

00:41:00.080 it suggested

00:41:00.940 it.

00:41:01.700 So,

00:41:01.980 let's go

00:41:02.780 with

00:41:02.920 suggesting.

00:41:04.340 But,

00:41:04.940 Twitter

00:41:05.200 handled it

00:41:06.120 better.

00:41:06.480 It put a

00:41:06.820 little warning

00:41:07.320 on it that

00:41:07.820 said,

00:41:08.580 you know,

00:41:08.880 this is

00:41:09.700 against our

00:41:10.280 standards,

00:41:11.980 but we

00:41:13.260 think it's

00:41:13.720 important that

00:41:14.220 you see it

00:41:14.640 because there's

00:41:15.080 like a

00:41:15.400 news value

00:41:16.260 to it

00:41:16.600 today.

00:41:20.800 All right.

00:41:24.220 Let me

00:41:24.840 ask you

00:41:25.160 this.

00:41:27.720 How would

00:41:28.500 any of

00:41:28.920 this 2020

00:41:29.700 and January

00:41:30.740 6th stuff

00:41:31.520 be different

00:41:32.680 if we

00:41:34.740 didn't have

00:41:35.360 lawyers?

00:41:37.200 Because think

00:41:37.760 of all the

00:41:38.180 lawyers that

00:41:38.800 caused this.

00:41:39.440 We had

00:41:39.660 first,

00:41:40.780 this is more

00:41:41.600 like allegedly

00:41:42.320 because I

00:41:42.800 don't know

00:41:43.120 what's true

00:41:43.640 and what's

00:41:43.960 not true.

00:41:44.960 But allegedly,

00:41:46.560 Democrat

00:41:47.120 lawyer Mark

00:41:47.900 Elias was

00:41:49.700 part of a

00:41:50.700 big effort

00:41:51.280 to,

00:41:52.160 you know,

00:41:53.340 change things

00:41:54.100 on the ground

00:41:54.760 within legal

00:41:55.720 bounds that

00:41:57.840 caused an

00:41:58.520 election result

00:41:59.660 that was

00:42:00.100 better for the

00:42:00.700 Democrats,

00:42:01.300 perhaps,

00:42:02.180 than people

00:42:02.700 expected.

00:42:04.060 Now,

00:42:04.360 that part's

00:42:04.780 true,

00:42:05.180 right?

00:42:05.760 Can you

00:42:06.280 fact check

00:42:06.760 me on

00:42:07.020 that?

00:42:07.780 That he

00:42:08.020 was part

00:42:08.420 of an

00:42:08.660 effort

00:42:08.980 within

00:42:10.300 completely

00:42:10.960 legal grounds,

00:42:12.060 apparently.

00:42:12.340 I mean,

00:42:13.480 he's not

00:42:13.880 going to

00:42:14.240 jail for

00:42:14.560 anything.

00:42:15.580 So,

00:42:16.560 but he

00:42:16.960 did some

00:42:17.500 rule changes

00:42:18.260 because of

00:42:18.860 the pandemic,

00:42:19.500 basically took

00:42:20.180 advantage and

00:42:21.820 created some

00:42:22.480 weaselly changes

00:42:24.000 that were good

00:42:24.920 for Democrats.

00:42:26.820 Now,

00:42:27.500 so that

00:42:27.920 caused,

00:42:28.880 number one,

00:42:29.500 a surprise

00:42:30.420 outcome.

00:42:31.500 So when a

00:42:32.020 Republican saw

00:42:32.740 the outcome,

00:42:34.580 they were like,

00:42:35.240 wait a minute,

00:42:35.760 this is not

00:42:36.360 normally what we

00:42:37.400 would expect,

00:42:38.040 so we

00:42:39.920 think there's

00:42:40.380 something sketchy

00:42:41.120 going on.

00:42:42.280 Now,

00:42:42.580 it could have

00:42:43.000 been that

00:42:44.640 whether you

00:42:45.140 like it or

00:42:45.720 not,

00:42:46.140 it was all

00:42:46.700 legal and

00:42:47.520 the Republicans

00:42:48.380 should have

00:42:48.880 done something

00:42:49.480 just as

00:42:49.940 clever,

00:42:50.420 but didn't.

00:42:51.240 So,

00:42:52.080 bad on

00:42:52.560 them.

00:42:54.120 So that's

00:42:54.820 one lawyer

00:42:55.280 thing.

00:42:55.960 Now we're

00:42:56.360 hearing that

00:42:57.020 Trump's

00:42:58.020 lawyer,

00:42:58.380 John Eastman,

00:42:59.780 was primarily

00:43:00.560 the person

00:43:01.220 who was

00:43:01.980 saying there

00:43:02.680 was a

00:43:03.480 completely

00:43:03.960 legal path

00:43:05.100 for Trump

00:43:06.520 to do

00:43:07.200 what he

00:43:07.460 was doing

00:43:07.900 around

00:43:08.340 January 6th,

00:43:10.180 which was

00:43:10.940 to support

00:43:11.720 some kind

00:43:12.700 of a delay

00:43:13.340 and maybe

00:43:14.160 fake electors

00:43:15.800 or something

00:43:16.320 like that.

00:43:17.140 So there

00:43:17.540 was primarily

00:43:18.100 one lawyer

00:43:19.220 close to

00:43:21.020 Trump who

00:43:21.560 was pushing

00:43:22.060 that interpretation.

00:43:24.760 So if that

00:43:25.640 one lawyer

00:43:26.260 had not said,

00:43:27.140 you know,

00:43:27.680 there is a

00:43:28.340 completely legal

00:43:29.160 way to do

00:43:29.660 this,

00:43:30.460 do you think

00:43:30.960 Trump would

00:43:32.880 have acted

00:43:33.340 the way he

00:43:33.840 acted?

00:43:35.100 Let me ask

00:43:35.600 you that.

00:43:36.560 Would Trump

00:43:37.220 have acted

00:43:37.780 the way he

00:43:38.280 acted if

00:43:39.760 not one

00:43:40.600 lawyer,

00:43:41.400 not one

00:43:42.400 lawyer,

00:43:43.220 told him it

00:43:43.760 would be

00:43:44.100 legal to

00:43:44.820 do so,

00:43:45.500 to act

00:43:45.800 the way

00:43:46.020 he acted?

00:43:47.380 I doubt

00:43:48.200 it.

00:43:49.520 Now,

00:43:50.180 I think

00:43:50.580 Trump can

00:43:51.040 overrule a

00:43:51.840 lawyer in

00:43:52.280 some situations

00:43:53.020 because he's

00:43:53.860 a high-end

00:43:54.980 executive.

00:43:55.620 They do

00:43:55.880 that and

00:43:56.820 they shouldn't

00:43:57.140 do that in

00:43:57.680 some situations.

00:43:59.580 But,

00:44:01.520 to me,

00:44:03.920 if you took

00:44:04.980 John Eastman

00:44:05.900 out of the

00:44:06.400 story,

00:44:07.640 a lot would

00:44:08.820 be different

00:44:09.340 about January

00:44:10.160 6th because

00:44:11.380 it was the

00:44:12.020 illusion that

00:44:12.880 there was

00:44:13.120 some kind

00:44:13.580 of totally

00:44:14.400 legal way

00:44:15.060 to do

00:44:15.360 this that

00:44:16.440 probably

00:44:17.220 allowed Trump

00:44:18.720 to say,

00:44:19.260 you know,

00:44:19.960 maybe we

00:44:20.760 should pause

00:44:21.240 and look

00:44:22.500 into this

00:44:22.960 because it

00:44:23.360 looks like

00:44:23.780 maybe there's

00:44:24.720 some legal

00:44:25.200 way to do

00:44:25.700 it.

00:44:25.880 So that's

00:44:27.620 two lawyers

00:44:28.360 that created

00:44:29.680 two things

00:44:30.380 that were

00:44:30.820 like the

00:44:31.260 fuel of

00:44:31.760 this thing.

00:44:32.740 And then

00:44:32.960 you have

00:44:33.220 Sidney

00:44:33.600 Powell

00:44:33.940 coming out

00:44:35.760 and promoting

00:44:36.740 the most

00:44:38.860 outrageous

00:44:39.460 parts,

00:44:40.900 you know,

00:44:41.120 the Venezuelan

00:44:42.740 generals and

00:44:43.900 the crazy

00:44:45.460 allegations against

00:44:46.920 Dominion,

00:44:48.620 the Kraken.

00:44:50.040 So she even

00:44:50.960 got me with

00:44:51.500 her Kraken.

00:44:52.280 At the time,

00:44:52.860 I thought to

00:44:53.240 myself,

00:44:53.600 you know,

00:44:54.300 there's no way

00:44:55.320 she'd say she

00:44:56.020 has the goods

00:44:56.920 unless she

00:44:58.160 has the goods.

00:45:00.380 So that's

00:45:01.220 on me.

00:45:01.640 That's like

00:45:01.940 one of the,

00:45:03.160 I feel like

00:45:04.180 that was a

00:45:04.660 learning experience

00:45:05.360 for me.

00:45:07.120 You know,

00:45:07.440 you can't

00:45:07.800 stop learning.

00:45:09.340 My learning

00:45:10.160 experience was

00:45:11.060 I said to

00:45:12.020 myself,

00:45:12.500 nobody with

00:45:13.180 her reputation,

00:45:14.480 which up to

00:45:15.020 that point

00:45:15.400 was very good.

00:45:17.220 Her reputation

00:45:17.920 was like a,

00:45:18.680 you know,

00:45:19.120 DC power

00:45:20.060 lawyer.

00:45:21.580 And I said,

00:45:22.420 nobody's going

00:45:22.920 to be like

00:45:23.320 the good

00:45:24.240 reputation

00:45:24.860 DC power

00:45:25.820 lawyer and

00:45:26.940 go say they

00:45:27.500 have the goods

00:45:28.280 unless they

00:45:29.660 have the goods.

00:45:30.380 and she

00:45:31.500 didn't have

00:45:31.880 the goods.

00:45:33.080 I did not

00:45:33.780 see that coming.

00:45:34.840 That was

00:45:35.360 surprising to

00:45:36.000 me.

00:45:36.720 All right,

00:45:37.060 now,

00:45:38.240 take those

00:45:39.440 three lawyers

00:45:40.280 out of the

00:45:40.740 story.

00:45:42.060 And now,

00:45:42.800 go further.

00:45:44.020 Go into

00:45:44.480 Congress and

00:45:45.780 remove from

00:45:46.800 Congress anybody

00:45:48.160 who's a lawyer

00:45:48.960 and leave

00:45:50.480 anybody who's

00:45:51.960 not.

00:45:54.160 Does any

00:45:55.140 of this look

00:45:55.680 the same?

00:45:56.140 In my

00:45:57.520 mind,

00:45:58.120 when you

00:45:58.540 elect lawyers,

00:45:59.860 you're

00:46:00.100 electing

00:46:00.500 people who

00:46:01.340 have a

00:46:02.180 hammer and

00:46:03.200 everything looks

00:46:03.820 like a nail.

00:46:05.060 What does a

00:46:06.000 lawyer do

00:46:06.700 when you've

00:46:08.380 got a political

00:46:09.220 problem or

00:46:10.200 something to

00:46:10.720 solve?

00:46:11.600 They cause a

00:46:12.520 hearing,

00:46:13.080 they call a

00:46:13.620 hearing,

00:46:14.680 and they do

00:46:15.380 something that

00:46:15.920 looks like a

00:46:16.500 mock trial,

00:46:17.840 and then they

00:46:18.660 litigate it in

00:46:19.360 front of the

00:46:19.780 public.

00:46:20.680 Why?

00:46:21.720 Because they're

00:46:22.500 lawyers.

00:46:22.920 Because they're

00:46:25.060 lawyers.

00:46:26.160 What would they

00:46:26.900 do if they

00:46:27.340 had been

00:46:27.620 engineers?

00:46:29.120 If Congress

00:46:30.000 had been filled

00:46:30.660 with only

00:46:31.340 people who

00:46:31.940 had worked

00:46:32.440 as engineers

00:46:33.160 before they

00:46:33.800 get elected,

00:46:35.020 do you think

00:46:35.500 that their

00:46:35.840 first instinct

00:46:36.560 would be,

00:46:37.020 you know

00:46:37.180 what we

00:46:37.440 need?

00:46:38.500 Some kind

00:46:39.060 of a

00:46:39.320 show trial.

00:46:41.800 Has any

00:46:42.500 group of

00:46:42.980 engineers ever

00:46:43.800 sat in a

00:46:44.240 room and

00:46:44.560 said,

00:46:45.700 our solution,

00:46:47.080 I'm pretty

00:46:47.580 sure,

00:46:48.780 would be to

00:46:49.380 have some

00:46:49.720 kind of a

00:46:50.160 public hearing

00:46:50.880 where we

00:46:52.100 litigate

00:46:52.620 this thing

00:46:53.120 which is

00:46:53.520 largely fake

00:46:54.120 news,

00:46:54.760 but they

00:46:55.380 won't

00:46:55.580 know.

00:46:57.360 No.

00:46:58.260 No.

00:46:59.320 The reason

00:47:00.200 we're in

00:47:00.580 the situation

00:47:01.220 we're in

00:47:01.800 is lawyers.

00:47:03.800 Lawyers in

00:47:04.480 Congress,

00:47:05.560 lawyers changing

00:47:06.440 the rules

00:47:06.980 about elections

00:47:07.660 which,

00:47:08.920 although totally

00:47:09.580 legally as

00:47:10.260 far as I

00:47:10.660 know,

00:47:11.880 cause a

00:47:12.660 certain reaction

00:47:13.340 in the

00:47:14.000 public.

00:47:15.120 John Eastman

00:47:15.820 made it

00:47:16.480 possible for

00:47:17.240 Trump to

00:47:18.000 follow his

00:47:19.960 worst instincts

00:47:20.820 in this

00:47:21.220 case,

00:47:21.800 maybe.

00:47:22.080 I mean,

00:47:22.820 I don't

00:47:23.060 know what

00:47:23.700 really

00:47:23.960 happened.

00:47:25.460 Then Sidney

00:47:25.960 Powell,

00:47:26.520 I mean,

00:47:26.860 was just

00:47:27.200 the match.

00:47:28.580 By the

00:47:28.860 time Sidney

00:47:29.360 Powell

00:47:29.580 came along,

00:47:30.420 you had

00:47:30.840 all the

00:47:31.320 gasoline,

00:47:32.660 and it

00:47:32.880 was all

00:47:33.160 caused by

00:47:33.680 lawyers.

00:47:34.920 And then

00:47:35.360 one more

00:47:35.920 lawyer came

00:47:36.520 and said,

00:47:37.080 Kraken,

00:47:38.440 I got the

00:47:39.160 Kraken,

00:47:39.640 here it is,

00:47:40.180 and then

00:47:40.480 just torched

00:47:41.460 the gas.

00:47:42.720 if you

00:47:46.000 asked me,

00:47:46.700 this is a

00:47:47.200 story about

00:47:47.740 lawyers,

00:47:49.260 that we're

00:47:50.620 acting as if

00:47:51.440 it's a story

00:47:52.040 about something

00:47:53.800 else.

00:47:55.180 And the

00:47:55.780 reason that

00:47:56.200 we're acting

00:47:56.580 like it's a

00:47:57.160 story about

00:47:57.640 something else

00:47:58.480 is because the

00:48:00.020 lawyers told

00:48:00.620 us to.

00:48:02.500 That's why.

00:48:03.940 The lawyers

00:48:04.560 have convinced

00:48:05.260 us that it's

00:48:06.560 not a story

00:48:07.200 about lawyers.

00:48:07.860 It's just a

00:48:08.920 lawyer fight.

00:48:10.240 It's just

00:48:10.680 lawyer on

00:48:11.320 lawyer,

00:48:11.960 and we're

00:48:12.380 just the

00:48:13.140 victims.

00:48:14.240 Basically,

00:48:15.000 we're the

00:48:15.940 innocent

00:48:16.420 bystanders

00:48:17.320 of a

00:48:18.280 giant

00:48:18.620 lawyer on

00:48:19.400 lawyer battle

00:48:20.240 that is

00:48:21.440 fought because

00:48:22.420 why do

00:48:23.460 lawyers fight?

00:48:25.500 Why do

00:48:25.980 lawyers have

00:48:27.040 conflict?

00:48:29.100 Because they're

00:48:30.120 trained to

00:48:31.240 have conflict.

00:48:33.120 Lawyers are

00:48:33.960 not trained to

00:48:34.600 give away

00:48:35.020 stuff.

00:48:36.300 They're trained

00:48:37.420 to fight.

00:48:39.260 Literally

00:48:39.780 trained to

00:48:40.500 fight.

00:48:41.260 What happens

00:48:42.000 when you put

00:48:42.600 the people

00:48:43.000 who are

00:48:43.320 trained for

00:48:44.280 conflict in

00:48:46.500 charge of

00:48:46.940 everything?

00:48:48.280 What the

00:48:48.960 fuck do you

00:48:49.640 think they're

00:48:50.040 going to do?

00:48:51.260 They're going

00:48:51.800 to do what

00:48:52.160 they've been

00:48:52.500 trained to do

00:48:53.020 all their

00:48:53.300 life.

00:48:54.300 Dispute shit.

00:48:56.380 What do you

00:48:56.820 do if you

00:48:57.460 put, let's

00:48:58.760 say, someone

00:49:01.500 who's more

00:49:01.940 of a deal

00:49:02.400 maker?

00:49:03.880 You're

00:49:04.360 probably going

00:49:04.820 to get

00:49:05.040 deals.

00:49:05.440 So, the

00:49:08.080 one year

00:49:08.900 that we

00:49:09.680 had, or

00:49:10.500 the one

00:49:10.960 term that

00:49:11.840 we had

00:49:12.120 Trump in

00:49:12.540 office, we

00:49:13.380 had a

00:49:13.640 deal maker

00:49:14.080 in office.

00:49:15.240 So, what

00:49:15.800 happened when

00:49:16.220 you put a

00:49:16.600 deal maker

00:49:17.020 in office?

00:49:17.880 You got

00:49:18.440 the Abraham

00:49:19.020 Accords, you

00:49:20.740 just made

00:49:21.520 a deal.

00:49:23.920 You get a

00:49:25.920 meeting with

00:49:26.420 North Korea

00:49:27.020 that completely

00:49:27.780 changed the

00:49:28.480 whole dynamic

00:49:29.160 there, because

00:49:30.800 Trump's not a

00:49:33.160 lawyer.

00:49:33.400 he's just

00:49:34.720 a guy who

00:49:35.300 saw another

00:49:35.760 guy.

00:49:37.360 And the

00:49:38.000 guy who

00:49:38.400 saw another

00:49:38.880 guy said,

00:49:39.640 well, why

00:49:39.960 don't we

00:49:40.220 meet and

00:49:41.340 stop being

00:49:41.880 enemies?

00:49:42.820 And then

00:49:43.160 they met, and

00:49:44.060 things got

00:49:45.080 weird, but

00:49:45.720 they got

00:49:46.540 less dangerous.

00:49:48.080 So, if

00:49:50.040 you only

00:49:51.100 hire hammers,

00:49:53.780 don't be

00:49:54.740 surprised when

00:49:55.460 they treat

00:49:55.820 everything like

00:49:56.400 a nail.

00:49:57.640 I mean, that's

00:49:58.080 sort of on

00:49:58.540 the public.

00:49:59.000 And I

00:50:00.100 would go so

00:50:00.640 far as to

00:50:01.120 say, maybe

00:50:02.680 it should be

00:50:03.340 illegal for

00:50:04.060 lawyers to

00:50:04.660 run for

00:50:04.980 office.

00:50:09.160 What about

00:50:09.880 that?

00:50:10.780 I heard

00:50:11.460 somebody said

00:50:12.000 it used to

00:50:12.400 be illegal,

00:50:13.340 but I don't

00:50:14.200 have any

00:50:14.660 confirmation that

00:50:15.620 that was ever

00:50:16.100 true.

00:50:16.740 Was that

00:50:17.120 ever legal or

00:50:18.380 ever illegal for

00:50:19.440 lawyers to run

00:50:20.120 for office?

00:50:21.640 Can somebody

00:50:22.240 confirm that?

00:50:24.540 It doesn't

00:50:25.280 sound right.

00:50:27.820 Yeah.

00:50:29.000 Yeah, John

00:50:29.960 Adams was a

00:50:30.620 lawyer.

00:50:31.440 True.

00:50:33.040 And John

00:50:33.880 Adams was

00:50:34.340 considered a

00:50:35.140 miserable person

00:50:36.040 to be around,

00:50:36.620 I think.

00:50:38.200 Probably I'm

00:50:39.060 related.

00:50:41.440 I mean, just

00:50:42.500 based on the

00:50:43.000 miserable part.

00:50:45.340 So, Lincoln

00:50:46.300 was a lawyer.

00:50:47.800 Well, look what

00:50:48.380 he did.

00:50:49.460 Caused a civil

00:50:50.180 war.

00:50:50.740 Just kidding.

00:50:51.620 Just kidding.

00:50:52.980 Just kidding.

00:50:55.860 Well, I

00:50:56.640 would argue

00:50:57.120 that the

00:50:58.240 lawyers of

00:50:58.980 old were

00:50:59.940 very different

00:51:00.620 than the

00:51:01.260 lawyers today.

00:51:03.840 And, you

00:51:04.900 know, I'm

00:51:05.180 not sure

00:51:05.560 that they

00:51:08.940 were as

00:51:09.520 conflict-driven

00:51:11.480 as maybe

00:51:12.260 they are

00:51:12.580 today.

00:51:12.980 Maybe they

00:51:13.360 were.

00:51:13.940 Could be.

00:51:15.280 Could be.

00:51:17.440 All right.

00:51:19.300 What else

00:51:19.960 is happening?

00:51:20.840 That's about

00:51:21.320 it.

00:51:23.000 So, here's

00:51:23.880 another one of

00:51:24.360 these.

00:51:24.900 We can't

00:51:25.420 tell what's

00:51:25.900 smart and

00:51:26.340 what's dumb.

00:51:26.860 Lithuania

00:51:29.280 some time

00:51:30.020 ago joined

00:51:30.760 NATO.

00:51:31.900 And, of

00:51:32.100 course, Lithuania

00:51:32.780 is on the

00:51:33.500 border there

00:51:34.400 with Russia.

00:51:36.380 And there

00:51:36.900 was some

00:51:37.260 little

00:51:37.600 stranded, if

00:51:39.140 you don't

00:51:39.400 know the

00:51:39.720 story, there

00:51:40.500 was a

00:51:40.740 little

00:51:40.900 stranded

00:51:41.540 part of

00:51:42.140 Russia that

00:51:43.720 was cut

00:51:44.280 off by what

00:51:45.180 is now

00:51:45.580 considered,

00:51:46.360 well, what

00:51:47.360 is Lithuania.

00:51:48.240 But there

00:51:49.560 was an

00:51:49.820 agreement that

00:51:50.900 I think it

00:51:51.320 was a

00:51:51.620 railway or

00:51:52.180 something, a

00:51:53.460 Russian railway

00:51:54.120 could connect

00:51:54.940 the two, and

00:51:56.320 Lithuania would

00:51:57.920 treat the

00:51:58.400 railway almost

00:52:00.000 as if it

00:52:00.740 were sovereign

00:52:01.500 Russian territory

00:52:02.500 because it

00:52:03.520 just made

00:52:03.880 everybody happy.

00:52:05.540 I mean, there

00:52:06.160 wasn't any

00:52:06.500 reason not

00:52:06.920 to.

00:52:08.540 Lithuania

00:52:09.060 didn't really

00:52:09.500 have any

00:52:09.820 reason to

00:52:10.280 cut Russia

00:52:10.800 off from

00:52:11.300 their own

00:52:12.140 territory.

00:52:13.540 And why

00:52:14.260 cause trouble?

00:52:14.900 So, you

00:52:15.780 know, they

00:52:16.540 just had a

00:52:17.040 little railroad

00:52:17.560 and everything

00:52:18.100 was fine.

00:52:18.940 But now we've

00:52:19.740 got this

00:52:20.060 Ukraine ugliness

00:52:21.060 and Lithuania

00:52:22.120 being part of

00:52:22.980 NATO and

00:52:23.680 influenced by

00:52:24.480 the West has

00:52:25.680 decided to

00:52:26.500 cut off that

00:52:27.940 access to

00:52:29.860 the Russian

00:52:30.260 territory.

00:52:32.200 Now, do you

00:52:33.100 know why they

00:52:33.740 thought they

00:52:34.160 could get away

00:52:34.640 with this without

00:52:35.200 creating any

00:52:37.320 blowback?

00:52:39.160 Because they're

00:52:40.080 in NATO.

00:52:41.620 So the fact

00:52:42.440 that Lithuania

00:52:43.180 is in NATO

00:52:44.120 caused them

00:52:45.740 to be a

00:52:46.400 little bit

00:52:46.740 more adventurous,

00:52:48.260 well, actually

00:52:48.660 a lot, than

00:52:50.260 they would

00:52:50.620 normally be.

00:52:52.680 So here's

00:52:53.540 the thing.

00:52:54.960 Did joining

00:52:55.600 NATO make

00:52:56.940 them more

00:52:57.420 safe or

00:52:58.000 less?

00:52:59.440 Because being

00:53:00.280 in NATO

00:53:00.820 caused, I

00:53:02.240 would assume,

00:53:03.260 NATO and

00:53:03.980 others associated

00:53:04.960 with NATO,

00:53:05.800 to influence

00:53:06.520 Lithuania to

00:53:07.360 do this

00:53:07.780 insanely

00:53:08.400 provocative

00:53:09.060 thing with

00:53:10.960 their neighbouring

00:53:11.660 country.

00:53:12.140 Insanely

00:53:12.700 provocative.

00:53:14.120 It's crazy.

00:53:15.580 It's so

00:53:15.960 provocative.

00:53:18.500 And I don't

00:53:19.360 think they

00:53:19.680 would have

00:53:19.920 done it if

00:53:20.560 they weren't

00:53:20.860 in NATO.

00:53:21.820 Now, do you

00:53:22.160 think Russia

00:53:22.600 is going to

00:53:22.920 let it stand?

00:53:24.680 Or are they

00:53:25.500 going to, or

00:53:26.520 is this the

00:53:27.040 provocation for

00:53:29.300 Russia to

00:53:31.000 attack something

00:53:32.400 that's part of

00:53:33.100 NATO so that

00:53:33.980 NATO can be

00:53:34.800 activated by a

00:53:36.520 technicality

00:53:37.400 because of

00:53:40.000 lawyers?

00:53:40.400 Yeah.

00:53:43.120 Don't you

00:53:43.540 think lawyers

00:53:44.160 get involved

00:53:44.860 when deciding

00:53:45.640 if NATO

00:53:46.940 has been,

00:53:47.840 let's say,

00:53:49.340 activated?

00:53:51.000 What do you

00:53:51.680 think?

00:53:52.220 Now, first

00:53:52.980 it would be

00:53:53.380 generals,

00:53:55.140 right?

00:53:56.260 I mean, because

00:53:56.840 you need the

00:53:57.360 immediate response.

00:53:58.540 They're not

00:53:58.920 going to run

00:53:59.220 things through

00:53:59.820 lawyers on

00:54:00.980 day one.

00:54:02.020 So, on

00:54:02.960 day one, it's

00:54:03.640 going to be the

00:54:04.060 generals.

00:54:04.940 Okay, what do

00:54:05.440 you do?

00:54:06.460 But on day

00:54:07.100 two, the

00:54:07.640 lawyers are

00:54:08.120 going to say,

00:54:08.560 we're kind of

00:54:10.920 watching this,

00:54:12.940 and, yeah, I

00:54:15.300 think this

00:54:15.780 technically is a

00:54:16.780 NATO violation,

00:54:17.740 so go ahead and

00:54:18.520 activate NATO.

00:54:20.100 Don't you think

00:54:20.780 lawyers are part

00:54:22.900 of the decision?

00:54:23.900 I don't know the

00:54:24.500 answer to that.

00:54:24.980 I'm speaking of

00:54:25.760 complete ignorance.

00:54:27.740 But I imagine,

00:54:29.540 I would imagine,

00:54:30.760 if you're talking

00:54:31.420 about a NATO

00:54:33.660 document,

00:54:35.720 who is it

00:54:36.340 who interprets

00:54:37.140 documents?

00:54:39.660 It's lawyers,

00:54:40.340 right?

00:54:41.000 So lawyers would

00:54:41.940 be the ones

00:54:42.400 interpreting whether

00:54:43.220 the rules were

00:54:43.920 being followed

00:54:44.560 in invoking

00:54:46.180 NATO or not.

00:54:48.840 Now, you've

00:54:50.880 heard Max

00:54:51.600 Boot say that

00:54:52.540 this is our

00:54:53.360 war, and

00:54:55.800 you know that

00:54:56.500 the military

00:54:58.860 industrial complex

00:55:00.060 would like it

00:55:00.660 to be even

00:55:02.920 larger.

00:55:03.340 So if you

00:55:05.580 follow the

00:55:06.100 money, it

00:55:07.800 seems that

00:55:08.260 Democrats and

00:55:09.120 the industrial

00:55:09.580 military complex

00:55:10.820 want more war,

00:55:13.320 and now we

00:55:13.960 see a

00:55:14.720 provocation for

00:55:16.100 a technical

00:55:17.080 activation of

00:55:18.940 NATO that

00:55:20.940 doesn't have to

00:55:21.620 happen.

00:55:22.440 It's a completely

00:55:23.180 optional thing.

00:55:25.020 Does it not

00:55:25.880 look like we

00:55:26.680 are goading

00:55:27.240 Putin into

00:55:28.140 activating NATO

00:55:29.140 so that we can

00:55:30.160 enlarge the

00:55:30.820 scope of the

00:55:31.280 war?

00:55:31.500 I mean, I'm

00:55:36.200 not a

00:55:36.760 sophisticated

00:55:37.360 observer of

00:55:39.100 any of this.

00:55:40.680 Like, what do

00:55:41.660 I know about

00:55:42.140 NATO and

00:55:42.920 international

00:55:44.120 relations?

00:55:44.920 I don't know

00:55:45.220 anything.

00:55:45.880 But on the

00:55:46.640 surface, that's

00:55:48.260 exactly what it

00:55:48.960 looks like,

00:55:49.440 right?

00:55:51.100 Now, I'm

00:55:51.820 open to, again,

00:55:52.960 to be consistent

00:55:54.040 with my own

00:55:54.680 philosophy.

00:55:55.460 I'm open that I

00:55:56.380 can't imagine

00:55:57.080 some other

00:55:57.620 explanation.

00:55:58.180 But at the

00:55:59.720 moment, I'm

00:56:00.600 just telling

00:56:00.980 you, I

00:56:01.320 can't imagine

00:56:03.140 another

00:56:03.760 explanation.

00:56:04.940 It looks like

00:56:05.780 the military

00:56:07.420 industrial complex

00:56:08.640 is causing the

00:56:10.560 United States

00:56:11.280 to activate

00:56:12.340 NATO to

00:56:13.520 improve the

00:56:14.160 profits of

00:56:15.580 one industry.

00:56:17.520 I'm not saying

00:56:18.580 that's the only

00:56:19.160 thing happening.

00:56:20.560 I'm saying I

00:56:21.760 don't see another

00:56:22.580 interpretation.

00:56:24.020 It's not obvious

00:56:24.980 to me.

00:56:25.800 So if there is

00:56:26.460 another

00:56:26.740 interpretation,

00:56:28.140 I'd be open

00:56:28.720 to it.

00:56:30.260 But if it

00:56:31.180 quacks like a

00:56:31.920 duck, sometimes

00:56:33.600 it's not a

00:56:34.260 duck, but

00:56:34.840 sometimes it's

00:56:35.680 a duck

00:56:36.000 call.

00:56:38.600 Sometimes if

00:56:39.280 it quacks like

00:56:39.880 a duck, it's

00:56:40.400 a duck

00:56:40.700 hunter.

00:56:42.020 Nobody tells

00:56:42.640 you that, do

00:56:43.160 they?

00:56:43.640 Yeah, yeah.

00:56:44.700 They tell you

00:56:45.200 if it quacks

00:56:45.680 like a duck,

00:56:47.060 well, they also

00:56:47.620 do the looks

00:56:48.340 like a duck.

00:56:49.240 Sometimes it's

00:56:49.900 a decoy

00:56:50.400 with a duck

00:56:51.740 call.

00:56:53.720 So there.

00:56:56.460 And now,

00:56:59.880 having given

00:57:01.280 you these

00:57:01.980 thoughts, I

00:57:04.580 would like to

00:57:05.240 point out the

00:57:06.580 following.

00:57:07.360 I'm very bad

00:57:08.220 at marketing

00:57:09.040 because it,

00:57:12.040 weirdly, even

00:57:12.940 though persuasion

00:57:13.820 is my primary

00:57:15.740 focus lately,

00:57:18.380 it feels

00:57:19.900 manipulative

00:57:20.560 to market.

00:57:21.840 I feel like the

00:57:22.520 most you should

00:57:23.340 do is let

00:57:23.880 people know

00:57:24.360 what's out

00:57:24.720 there, and

00:57:25.080 if they want

00:57:26.320 it, they

00:57:27.740 go get it.

00:57:28.640 And then

00:57:29.020 everybody's

00:57:29.460 happy.

00:57:30.040 I hate to

00:57:30.580 overmarket it

00:57:31.300 because then

00:57:31.600 people get

00:57:32.120 things that

00:57:32.600 they don't

00:57:34.520 like.

00:57:36.780 But I feel

00:57:37.760 it's incumbent

00:57:38.320 upon you to

00:57:39.180 tell you the

00:57:39.560 following.

00:57:40.600 The subscribers

00:57:41.560 to the

00:57:42.140 Locals

00:57:42.520 platform,

00:57:44.060 Locals.com,

00:57:46.260 or no,

00:57:46.960 well, I think

00:57:47.380 it's on

00:57:47.760 Locals.com

00:57:48.560 where you

00:57:48.840 find the

00:57:49.320 page,

00:57:50.400 on Locals.

00:57:51.520 But the

00:57:52.200 subscribers there

00:57:53.020 who see my

00:57:54.080 other content

00:57:54.760 have accessed

00:57:55.620 over 200

00:57:56.960 micro-lessons

00:57:58.160 that would

00:57:59.500 give you

00:57:59.960 either 200

00:58:01.300 life hacks

00:58:03.240 that would

00:58:04.580 make you

00:58:05.000 more effective

00:58:05.580 in life or

00:58:06.180 happier.

00:58:08.400 And you

00:58:09.020 can learn

00:58:09.360 all of them

00:58:09.980 because they're

00:58:10.660 so small,

00:58:11.760 they're little

00:58:12.080 videos,

00:58:12.660 they're like

00:58:12.960 two to four

00:58:13.840 minutes.

00:58:15.220 So in a

00:58:16.060 period of

00:58:16.640 just 10

00:58:18.440 hours,

00:58:18.900 you could

00:58:20.800 learn 200

00:58:21.660 reframes or

00:58:23.560 life hacks

00:58:24.260 that by

00:58:25.300 their design

00:58:25.920 are big

00:58:26.300 ones,

00:58:27.260 like they're

00:58:27.620 not trivial.

00:58:28.500 I'm not

00:58:28.900 telling you

00:58:29.300 how to make

00:58:30.860 sure the

00:58:31.320 mustard in

00:58:32.000 your refrigerator

00:58:33.200 lasts longer.

00:58:34.300 I'm not

00:58:34.620 talking about

00:58:35.040 that.

00:58:36.060 I'm talking

00:58:36.500 about,

00:58:36.820 like,

00:58:37.260 happiness.

00:58:38.920 I'm talking

00:58:39.620 about health.

00:58:42.180 I'm talking

00:58:42.660 about how

00:58:44.200 to have a

00:58:44.840 better

00:58:44.980 relationship,

00:58:46.680 how to

00:58:47.100 talk to

00:58:47.540 strangers,

00:58:49.000 how to

00:58:49.300 be successful,

00:58:50.160 how to

00:58:50.360 build a

00:58:50.700 talent stack.

00:58:51.840 I'm talking

00:58:52.360 about the

00:58:52.860 most basic

00:58:54.120 things you

00:58:54.660 need to be

00:58:55.120 happy.

00:58:56.240 And in,

00:58:57.160 I'd say,

00:58:57.640 10 to 15

00:58:58.340 hours,

00:58:59.520 you could

00:59:00.040 consume them

00:59:02.060 while you're

00:59:02.620 on the

00:59:02.900 toilet.

00:59:04.200 Literally.

00:59:05.960 They're so

00:59:06.620 small,

00:59:07.180 a little video

00:59:07.760 thing,

00:59:08.140 you just put

00:59:08.560 the audio

00:59:09.000 in your ear,

00:59:10.060 just listen

00:59:10.620 to them

00:59:10.940 one at a

00:59:11.340 time.

00:59:12.340 And imagine

00:59:12.880 at the end

00:59:13.600 of a year

00:59:14.100 that you

00:59:15.780 had consumed

00:59:16.460 over 200

00:59:17.480 major life

00:59:19.620 improvement

00:59:20.120 hacks,

00:59:21.040 major ones.

00:59:22.360 None of

00:59:22.760 them are

00:59:23.000 small.

00:59:24.000 I mean,

00:59:24.240 the smallest

00:59:24.660 one would

00:59:25.160 be how

00:59:26.180 to be a

00:59:26.560 better

00:59:26.760 writer.

00:59:29.140 You wouldn't

00:59:29.880 want to be a

00:59:30.340 better writer

00:59:31.020 in five minutes

00:59:33.020 because it does

00:59:34.320 deliver that.

00:59:35.000 It actually

00:59:35.340 delivers that.

00:59:36.060 You would be

00:59:36.480 absolutely a

00:59:37.200 better writer

00:59:37.620 in five minutes

00:59:39.280 and forever.

00:59:41.880 So that's the

00:59:42.800 sort of

00:59:43.160 improvement you

00:59:44.020 could get.

00:59:44.940 Now,

00:59:45.620 I feel

00:59:47.320 like icky

00:59:49.320 when I do

00:59:49.860 marketing like

00:59:50.580 this.

00:59:51.480 But on the

00:59:51.960 other hand,

00:59:52.460 I would feel

00:59:52.920 icky if you

00:59:53.700 didn't know

00:59:54.080 it was there.

00:59:56.260 Because imagine,

00:59:58.480 and if you

00:59:59.960 don't mind,

01:00:00.780 those of you

01:00:01.560 who have seen

01:00:02.120 the micro

01:00:02.500 lessons or at

01:00:03.200 least have been

01:00:03.680 exposed to the

01:00:04.420 same material,

01:00:05.780 can you tell

01:00:06.420 the other people

01:00:07.120 if it made a

01:00:08.060 difference in your

01:00:08.640 life?

01:00:09.680 So some of you,

01:00:10.740 most of you

01:00:11.160 are watching or

01:00:11.740 not familiar with

01:00:12.480 it.

01:00:13.240 Now, most of

01:00:13.760 you, oh, I

01:00:16.340 wonder if I

01:00:16.740 could do this.

01:00:18.040 So the

01:00:18.620 locals platform,

01:00:20.400 I'm going to

01:00:20.740 try something.

01:00:21.360 I think this

01:00:21.800 works.

01:00:23.340 The locals

01:00:24.000 platform is

01:00:24.700 telling you

01:00:25.500 how much

01:00:26.560 benefit they've

01:00:27.160 gotten.

01:00:28.160 And I'm going

01:00:28.560 to turn you

01:00:29.400 toward each

01:00:30.920 other.

01:00:32.680 Let's see if

01:00:33.140 the YouTube

01:00:33.600 people can

01:00:36.280 see the

01:00:36.720 comments from

01:00:37.860 the locals

01:00:38.640 people.

01:00:39.520 I think, oh,

01:00:39.880 I think that's

01:00:40.320 working.

01:00:41.500 Or is it

01:00:42.120 backwards?

01:00:42.920 Is it

01:00:43.180 writing

01:00:43.400 backwards?

01:00:44.600 Because my

01:00:45.200 screen is, I've

01:00:46.400 got backwards

01:00:46.940 screens, so.

01:00:49.940 All right.

01:00:50.780 So you can

01:00:52.460 see what the,

01:00:55.740 okay.

01:00:56.920 So on

01:00:57.560 locals, just

01:00:58.480 tell them if

01:00:59.060 you think the

01:00:59.640 micro lessons

01:01:00.340 have had a

01:01:01.660 substantial impact

01:01:03.720 in your life.

01:01:05.060 And an

01:01:05.780 emphasis on

01:01:06.360 substantial.

01:01:07.320 Like, I'm

01:01:07.640 not talking

01:01:08.040 about how to

01:01:08.920 open jars.

01:01:09.520 numbers.

01:01:11.660 All right.

01:01:12.480 So you

01:01:13.020 get the

01:01:13.280 idea.

01:01:16.120 Thank you.

01:01:18.200 Thank you for

01:01:18.800 doing that.

01:01:19.360 By the way,

01:01:19.780 this is a

01:01:20.220 technique I

01:01:20.860 borrowed from

01:01:21.580 Tony Snow

01:01:22.620 from the

01:01:24.240 Dale Carnegie

01:01:26.000 school.

01:01:27.340 Dale Carnegie

01:01:27.880 just has his

01:01:28.600 students sell

01:01:29.240 the program.

01:01:31.040 He doesn't do

01:01:31.760 it himself.

01:01:32.580 He just has

01:01:33.160 the students

01:01:33.640 do it.

01:01:33.960 Because once

01:01:34.340 you see the

01:01:34.800 students sell

01:01:35.480 it, you

01:01:35.700 go, okay,

01:01:36.480 I've got to

01:01:36.760 have that.

01:01:38.680 It's a

01:01:39.200 completely

01:01:39.520 different level

01:01:40.320 of sales.

01:01:41.640 So I just

01:01:42.140 showed you

01:01:42.480 what the

01:01:42.760 locals people

01:01:43.340 are getting

01:01:43.680 out of it,

01:01:44.240 so you can

01:01:44.760 judge for

01:01:45.140 yourself.

01:01:46.240 All right,

01:01:46.560 that is all

01:01:47.120 for today.

01:01:50.920 I think

01:01:51.680 you'd agree

01:01:52.220 this is the

01:01:53.940 most valuable

01:01:54.620 thing that's

01:01:55.120 happened to

01:01:55.500 you so far

01:01:56.060 today.

01:01:57.300 Probably the

01:01:58.000 best thing.

01:01:59.200 And maybe

01:01:59.780 one of the

01:02:00.080 best things

01:02:00.480 that's ever

01:02:00.840 happened to

01:02:01.220 civilization,

01:02:01.760 because those

01:02:02.420 micro-lessons

01:02:03.160 are going

01:02:03.460 to go from

01:02:03.980 me to

01:02:04.900 locals to

01:02:05.580 you to

01:02:06.640 the world,

01:02:07.340 and I

01:02:07.980 think everything's

01:02:08.660 going to be

01:02:08.920 different in

01:02:09.460 about a year.

01:02:11.120 That's my

01:02:11.800 prediction.

01:02:13.200 So go

01:02:14.380 forward today

01:02:15.060 and have an

01:02:15.560 amazing day.

01:02:17.760 It's a good

01:02:18.300 start.

01:02:19.620 Don't blow it.

01:02:20.940 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 21, 2022

Episode 1781 Scott Adams： The News Is Perfectly Constructed Today. Come Savor It With Me

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript