Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1791 Scott Adams： How To Gaslight Yourself Using The Democrat Method

00:00:00.760 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization.

00:00:07.020 One correction and or clarification.

00:00:11.640 A lot of people think that when I turn this on, I'm saying bum bum bum, as in B-U-M.

00:00:20.800 No, no, it's P-U-M. 1.00

00:00:23.880 Bum bum bum, bum bum. 0.99

00:00:26.640 You have to get it right, otherwise the whole thing goes downhill.

00:00:30.580 It's a slippery slope to not talking at all.

00:00:33.980 And if you'd like to take today's experience up, and that's what it is, it's an experience.

00:00:38.960 It's not a show.

00:00:40.460 It's like Joe Rogan had it right.

00:00:42.120 It's an experience.

00:00:43.800 And your experience might include grabbing a cuppa mug or a glass of tank or chalice or sign a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:53.200 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:54.940 I like coffee.

00:00:55.940 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes your oxytocin hum.

00:01:06.600 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:01:09.000 It's famous everywhere.

00:01:10.520 It's changing the world.

00:01:12.240 Go.

00:01:12.440 Go.

00:01:17.500 Now, you don't have to drink just coffee.

00:01:23.620 Somebody on Locals says that they drink only freshly melted mountain snow, to which I say, now that's something I aspire to.

00:01:35.760 Well, remember, I had this great idea, according to me and nobody else, that one of the biggest trends in America would be these little homes that are actually kind of awesome and you can build them in a factory.

00:01:52.140 They're part of the ADU movement where you can put a little one for your in-laws in the backyard or whatever.

00:01:59.020 But I said that the real big gain is going to be not that you can put these in your backyard, because that's a limited market, but that they would build, they would design communities where there are only these little homes.

00:02:12.320 And then the whole community would be designed so, even though the inside of your home might not be palatial, the way the community is laid out is so well designed that you just love living there.

00:02:24.680 And have I ever told you that all of my ideas have two qualities?

00:02:31.760 I think Elon Musk said this recently, too.

00:02:35.040 So my ideas have two qualities.

00:02:37.300 One, there's no way they will ever work.

00:02:40.860 That's the first quality.

00:02:42.020 There's no way that idea is ever going to work.

00:02:44.360 The second quality is somebody's already doing it.

00:02:48.560 It's always those two.

00:02:50.020 It's impossible.

00:02:51.240 Man, somebody's already doing it.

00:02:52.500 Scott, you don't have any creative ideas.

00:02:54.820 And so here it is again.

00:02:56.420 So sure enough, they're in Atlanta.

00:02:59.180 There's a place called, and this is not a joke, southparkcottages.com.

00:03:06.580 And go take a look at it.

00:03:07.780 I think it's what's going to happen.

00:03:10.280 And here's why.

00:03:12.060 The cost of living in what I'd call a legacy house, a house that was built for the lifestyle of the 80s, just doesn't work.

00:03:21.400 It's like an insane amount of expense to maintain it and everything.

00:03:26.340 And it doesn't even have basic stuff that you would need for today's lifestyle.

00:03:31.560 It's built around a television set.

00:03:34.680 Right?

00:03:34.960 Modern houses, like the living room, is sort of built around watching TV.

00:03:40.060 But people walk around with their headphones, and their phones now are not sitting around the screen.

00:03:44.720 So the basic lifestyle has so changed since 1980, you have to start over.

00:03:51.760 And since you couldn't possibly afford a $2 million house that would have cost $200,000 not too long ago,

00:04:00.100 you're going to end up getting these tiny little homes but living in awesome communities,

00:04:05.140 and you actually will upgrade your experience.

00:04:09.340 You want to hear something that will really make you mad?

00:04:12.860 Suppose they're mostly rented.

00:04:16.120 Let's say people build a community, and investors each get to own a little house that they rent.

00:04:23.720 So it's basically a way to invest.

00:04:25.600 If you did that, the people who live there would, and let's say they're even furnished,

00:04:33.500 because I think they might even come furnished.

00:04:36.420 But if you did that, and you were renting, you would own nothing, and you would be happy.

00:04:43.820 What does that sound like?

00:04:47.040 It's that World Forum New World Order thing, right?

00:04:51.240 Yeah, Klaus, what's his name?

00:04:52.380 He said, in the future, you will own nothing and be happier.

00:04:58.100 Now, the way you interpreted that is we're all going to be communists, right?

00:05:02.440 You will own nothing and be happier.

00:05:04.300 You'll all be communists.

00:05:06.120 Maybe.

00:05:07.140 Maybe that's exactly what he meant.

00:05:08.760 I don't know.

00:05:09.640 But here's the other thing it could have meant.

00:05:12.780 It could have meant that personal ownership of property is impractical.

00:05:18.960 I own a house.

00:05:20.060 And walking from my home office, where I am right now, to the kitchen, do you know how

00:05:28.200 many distractions and unnecessary things I have to think of to walk from here to the

00:05:33.040 kitchen?

00:05:34.360 That trip is filled with adventure every time.

00:05:39.360 And the adventure is there's something broken, leaking, or spilled every time I make that

00:05:46.620 trip.

00:05:46.900 And it's just right downstairs.

00:05:48.980 It's literally right below me.

00:05:50.740 I just go to the stairs and walk down.

00:05:52.860 And I can't even get there without a whole bunch of problems that are caused by, what are

00:05:59.000 all the problems caused by?

00:06:01.660 My ownership of the property.

00:06:03.820 It's my problem because I own it.

00:06:05.660 But if somebody else owned it, it would sort of be their problem.

00:06:12.100 So there are two trends that you should watch.

00:06:16.540 One is that everything's more complicated.

00:06:19.480 Have you tried to do anything lately?

00:06:23.560 Have you tried to do anything?

00:06:25.560 It's so complicated to do anything.

00:06:29.120 Here, let me give you an example.

00:06:30.120 Um, I had silenced an alert for somebody a while ago, and I was trying to undo it.

00:06:38.800 Do you know how many ways you can silence an alert on your phone now? 0.98

00:06:42.800 So you try to just undo it, and you can't fucking figure it out.

00:06:46.620 There's like one way on the line, you know, you can do it on the line where they show up 0.89

00:06:50.540 in your thing.

00:06:51.600 You can change your focus on the iPhone.

00:06:54.640 There's like a focus thing that turns off your alarm sometimes.

00:06:57.560 There's also a way you can block them individually.

00:07:00.840 I think there's five ways.

00:07:03.000 Oh, but you can also turn off the physical alarm on the phone.

00:07:08.340 So trying to get...

00:07:09.700 Oh, and I also have my phone set so that only people in my contacts call me.

00:07:16.440 So simply using my phone, just when it's just too hard.

00:07:21.680 The other day, uh, yeah, I've reached a certain age, so now I have to, I had to look into this

00:07:27.480 thing called Medicare.

00:07:29.740 Now, do you have any idea how complicated it is to sign up for Medicare?

00:07:35.580 And they make old people do it. 1.00

00:07:38.100 This is the worst thing I've ever seen.

00:07:40.440 And I had to actually hire somebody, I paid somebody, to go figure it out for me, because

00:07:46.200 I couldn't.

00:07:46.740 Let me say it again, I have two college degrees, and I don't think that I'm slowing down that

00:07:55.340 much, you know, with age.

00:07:57.820 Two college degrees.

00:08:00.460 I couldn't even come close to penetrating how you sign up for Medicare, or even what it was.

00:08:06.400 I actually couldn't even barely figure out what it was, or why you need it, or who gets

00:08:10.680 it, you know, is it income limited?

00:08:14.000 Is there some kind of, you know, window?

00:08:16.380 Does it save you money?

00:08:18.080 Does it give you worse or better coverage?

00:08:20.720 I didn't know any of that.

00:08:22.240 And so I actually had my, my bookkeeper, who is awesome and does lots of things for me,

00:08:29.120 um, help me figure it out.

00:08:32.380 And so she, she came back with a lot of details, and just to sign up for it, there's like, it's

00:08:39.220 taken me days to collect all the things.

00:08:41.680 I'll say, here are the things that I need.

00:08:43.740 I need, for example, information from my first marriage, like the beginning and end dates

00:08:49.160 of my first marriage, like not even my current one.

00:08:52.780 Um, beginning and end dates of corporate, you know, of my employment, which is complicated

00:08:57.980 because at one point I set up a corporate account, but it was really the same job.

00:09:03.520 How do you handle that?

00:09:04.520 Because it's really two entities, but the same job.

00:09:06.520 And so I've been working on this for days.

00:09:09.800 I'm like searching through records and, you know, finding things.

00:09:13.340 And so far, all I've gotten to is collecting the information.

00:09:16.320 I haven't even got to the point where I have to go online and try to fill it out.

00:09:21.260 Now imagine that everything's like that.

00:09:24.480 This is the stuff that has to get fixed.

00:09:27.660 All right, let me, let me, let me describe to you a future city and see if you'd want to

00:09:34.660 live there, it's a future city, doesn't exist.

00:09:39.640 The government has one job besides defense, right?

00:09:44.240 So it's going to be your physical security and your police, but it has basically one job.

00:09:49.300 It's an insurance company.

00:09:51.380 It's the only one.

00:09:53.120 So you'd get everything from your car insurance to your life insurance to your, um, even your

00:09:57.500 appliance insurance.

00:09:59.140 You would insure even your appliances in your home with the government.

00:10:02.840 And the governments would not tax you.

00:10:06.700 No taxes.

00:10:08.420 You would just pay for insurance.

00:10:10.720 But you'd only pay once and you'd never have to shop because everybody would get the same

00:10:14.940 insurance because it'd be awesome.

00:10:16.520 There'd be nothing missing.

00:10:17.920 You would never have to look at your insurance.

00:10:20.220 You'd never have to figure it out.

00:10:21.860 You'd never have to do it yourself.

00:10:23.480 But you would also never be not covered.

00:10:26.300 Here's another thing.

00:10:27.060 Have you ever tried to form a partnership or a corporation because you have a small business?

00:10:33.860 It's really, really complicated and unnecessary.

00:10:37.260 In the city of the future, everybody will have the same protection as any corporation.

00:10:42.620 Do you know why?

00:10:43.880 Because there's no reason not to.

00:10:45.960 There never was.

00:10:46.720 There's no reason that somebody who hired a lawyer and then turns himself into, like,

00:10:52.520 an LLC, a limited liability corporation, or a corporation, S-Corp, there's no reason that

00:10:59.480 they should be protected.

00:11:00.960 And the person who didn't have a lawyer to do that is not.

00:11:04.720 Just make the law that says everybody has that same protection.

00:11:07.460 That's it.

00:11:08.220 You could get rid of lawyers.

00:11:10.480 You could just have standard contracts.

00:11:12.520 Just get rid of lawyers. 1.00

00:11:13.440 Every contract's the same.

00:11:16.240 Right?

00:11:17.360 So you could imagine starting from scratch and just say, what if we got rid of all the

00:11:22.200 complication of everything?

00:11:24.180 You know, all insurance and laws and all that stuff.

00:11:28.060 You could do it.

00:11:28.880 And home ownership is insanely complicated.

00:11:32.140 Now, you might like it, and you would still have that option.

00:11:35.620 But if I could get rid of all of the complications of ownership of property and my car.

00:11:41.860 Do you know how many problems I have with my car right now?

00:11:45.980 I think I have three different alerts.

00:11:49.820 But getting it to the dealer, getting the right time, getting a ride back, because Uber

00:11:56.140 doesn't work here anymore.

00:11:57.840 You know, organizing it with somebody else's schedule.

00:12:00.560 And then there's going to be parts and, you know.

00:12:02.760 Like, everything.

00:12:03.960 Every single thing I own is a project. 0.96

00:12:06.000 I have almost no time to work, because I'm just taking care of my broken shit all the 0.98

00:12:12.480 time. 0.97

00:12:13.020 And I don't, you know, it's not like I own that much.

00:12:15.600 Like, I got one house, one car.

00:12:17.280 But it's all broken all the time.

00:12:19.100 I just had to take my, you know, I thought I was all happy getting an e-bike until that

00:12:24.540 started breaking.

00:12:25.500 Anyway.

00:12:27.560 Simplification.

00:12:27.920 In today's comic, well, this week, Dilbert's company decided to go into the business of

00:12:34.900 making voting machines.

00:12:36.860 How do you think that's going so far?

00:12:40.380 I wondered if I would get canceled for this.

00:12:43.640 So the setup is that Dilbert's company decides to get into the business of making voting machines.

00:12:49.660 Now, of course, you're all going to read into it that I'm really making fun of an existing

00:12:54.560 company.

00:12:55.060 But I'm not.

00:12:57.540 I mean, I don't need to.

00:12:58.700 I'm simply showing what Dilbert's company would do if they were in that business.

00:13:03.120 So if you read into it anything else, that would be on you.

00:13:06.780 But let me tell you what today's comic was, just so you know what kind of trouble I'm getting

00:13:11.220 into.

00:13:11.900 The boss is describing to his team.

00:13:15.120 He says, Elbonian hackers got into our voting machine software.

00:13:19.540 They deleted our secret backdoor access for rigging elections and fixed several critical

00:13:25.040 security bugs.

00:13:26.460 And then the boss yells, our homeland is under attack.

00:13:30.040 And Dilbert looks at him and says, which side am I on?

00:13:35.720 So that was the setup.

00:13:37.500 Now, people are wondering if I will get canceled for this.

00:13:41.100 Kind of wondering myself.

00:13:43.100 Kind of wondering myself.

00:13:45.480 Yeah.

00:13:46.020 Have you noticed how close I skate to cancellation?

00:13:50.260 Now, I maintain that it's actually easy to not get canceled.

00:13:53.640 I could prove myself wrong, but I maintain that it's very obvious what is over the line.

00:14:02.180 And therefore, you can walk right up to it because it's so obvious what it would take

00:14:06.660 to go over it.

00:14:07.480 You just don't do that.

00:14:09.280 Like, it doesn't happen on its own.

00:14:11.000 You have to actually write something that's pretty bad.

00:14:14.800 And I just don't do that.

00:14:15.900 So I feel like I'm frustrating the people who must be looking at me to try to cancel me

00:14:21.340 at this point.

00:14:22.780 Don't you believe that there's a constituency, if you would call it that, of people who are

00:14:28.040 really, really looking at me hard and saying, oh, you are so close.

00:14:33.000 We are locked and loaded.

00:14:34.740 If you go one more step, one more step, we gotcha.

00:14:39.720 But I don't, so far.

00:14:43.300 I probably will.

00:14:44.980 I mean, if I had to bet on it, I'd bet against myself, I think.

00:14:49.280 But here are your gaslight reminders.

00:14:51.660 This is courtesy of the Democrats.

00:14:53.920 These are three things that you need to remind yourself, because if you didn't remind yourself

00:14:58.200 of these on a regular basis, you would fall out of the gaslighting, let's say, zone.

00:15:06.580 So if you want to stay gaslit and keep up with everybody else, because that's the state

00:15:12.420 of the country, there are three things that you must accept.

00:15:15.740 Number one, you can conquer a superpower with bear spray and clubs.

00:15:23.180 You have to hold that as true.

00:15:25.400 Number two, you can know something doesn't exist by not looking for it.

00:15:31.880 You must hold that as true in order to stay in your gaslight zone here.

00:15:35.560 And then the most important one, every government system in the United States is corrupt and

00:15:41.700 non-credible, except for all 50 individual and different state voting systems.

00:15:48.760 Those are A+.

00:15:49.760 Now, those three things, you have to keep in your head as true, or else nothing else you

00:15:56.500 see makes sense.

00:15:58.220 Because they're sort of the tent poles of the gaslight operation. 0.59

00:16:03.740 So if you don't accept those three tent poles, which are, frankly, ridiculous, you can't

00:16:12.020 be part of the gaslight.

00:16:15.620 Speaking of gaslighting, so there was a Biden aide on CNN who was asked, what do you say to

00:16:22.540 those families who say, listen, we can't afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for a gas for months,

00:16:28.880 if not years, we can't afford that.

00:16:30.540 What do you say to them?

00:16:31.960 And the Biden advisor said, and his name is Brian Deese, Deese, D-E-E-S-E, as in Deese

00:16:41.100 nuts.

00:16:43.040 Deese nuts, yeah. 0.96

00:16:44.460 So that's where it came from, that saying.

00:16:47.660 When people say, how about these?

00:16:49.420 And you say, Deese nuts?

00:16:51.560 That was from Brian, actually.

00:16:53.460 No, it's not true.

00:16:54.240 Anyway, Brian Deese responded to that question by saying, quote, this is about the future

00:17:01.800 of the liberal world order, and we have to stand firm.

00:17:07.900 Wait, what?

00:17:10.380 Wait, wait, wait, what?

00:17:13.300 And I actually had to play it back again, because I thought, well, no, he didn't actually say

00:17:18.360 that, did he?

00:17:18.880 Now, apparently, Biden has said that before.

00:17:21.820 I don't know how far back, but Biden's actually used the term, something called a liberal new

00:17:27.080 world order, or liberal world order, the LWO, I guess.

00:17:33.200 And so basically, he was saying that this change toward a liberal-centric world with, I guess,

00:17:42.600 climate change being addressed more aggressively, et cetera, that that's where we're going,

00:17:49.600 and that's where we want to go, and that is more important than your family eating and

00:17:53.700 buying gas.

00:17:55.560 And he says it directly.

00:17:58.020 He's basically saying, you know, tough it out, you know, tough it out, people, because

00:18:04.860 we've got bigger fish to fry.

00:18:07.160 We want to make things like we want them.

00:18:11.140 When I hear that, it sounds like somebody cares about winning more than they care about

00:18:19.340 people, because why did you have to put a liberal in the description of where it needs

00:18:25.060 to be?

00:18:26.320 I feel like he described a team competition where he said, yeah, you know, some people are

00:18:33.420 going to get hurt, but our team has to win.

00:18:35.940 Because when you say it's about the future of the liberal world order, that's not even

00:18:41.780 a set of benefits that I even understand.

00:18:45.260 That sounds like it's about the New York Yankees winning the World Series.

00:18:52.120 Isn't that what it sounds like?

00:18:54.380 Like, what are the reasons?

00:18:56.100 Like, can you give me any meat about what are the good things that we will have?

00:19:00.180 Because you just mentioned the name of the team.

00:19:03.820 Mentioning the name of the team feels like you just see this as a competition, like a

00:19:09.860 sport.

00:19:10.460 Like, you're not even taking seriously that the people that CNN, to their credit, to their

00:19:16.900 credit, and this is always worth mentioning, because CNN's trying to transition to more

00:19:22.260 straight news.

00:19:23.240 But to their credit, they were asking a tough question, which is, what the hell are you going

00:19:27.240 to do about gas prices, because there's no good answer?

00:19:29.800 And their answer is, what's more important is that our team wins.

00:19:34.300 Basically, that's what I heard.

00:19:36.380 It's jaw-dropping, isn't it?

00:19:38.300 You know, and a lot of people were doing the tweet, you know, they said the silent part out

00:19:43.320 loud.

00:19:44.400 They really did.

00:19:45.660 This really is the silent part out loud, that the team element here is the important part. 0.99

00:19:53.140 Damn it. 0.95

00:19:53.660 Well, Biden said he might support changing the senator's filibuster rule, specifically 0.99

00:20:02.320 for the Roe vs. Wade stuff.

00:20:05.140 And does that work?

00:20:07.860 Can somebody do a fact check on me?

00:20:09.960 I didn't have time to do it.

00:20:11.760 Did...

00:20:13.800 Isn't that what Mitch McConnell did for getting justices through?

00:20:19.400 So, don't we already have a one exception to the filibuster?

00:20:25.020 Am I wrong on that?

00:20:26.160 Do I have...

00:20:26.780 Give me a fact check on that.

00:20:29.140 Oh, that was Harry Reid?

00:20:31.320 Harry Reid did that, okay.

00:20:33.580 But can you fact check the question, was that carved out as an exception to the filibuster

00:20:39.980 rule?

00:20:40.380 It was, right?

00:20:42.600 Based on specific legislation.

00:20:44.660 So, here's the first question.

00:20:48.920 Would it be copacetic?

00:20:53.160 I mean, forget about whether you want it to happen.

00:20:55.720 Separate question.

00:20:57.500 Do we want this to be part of our system?

00:21:00.660 Do we want a system where you could change it for a specific legislation?

00:21:05.140 Because wouldn't you then change it for every legislation that you wanted to get through?

00:21:09.620 Why would you stop with this one?

00:21:12.980 Everything they want to do is probably important, right?

00:21:16.820 So, why would you say this is the one place where we'll make that exception?

00:21:23.140 I don't know.

00:21:24.560 Feels like...

00:21:26.460 I hate to say slippery slope, because there's no slope at all.

00:21:32.260 The moment you say this exception can be made, and maybe Harry Reid already did it,

00:21:37.180 the moment you say there could be an exception, then there's no point in the filibuster anymore,

00:21:41.140 is there?

00:21:42.240 Because you'll just make an exception whenever you want one.

00:21:45.360 I mean, if the majority can make an exception, why wouldn't they do it all the time?

00:21:49.080 So, there's something here I don't quite understand.

00:21:51.620 Maybe you do.

00:21:57.940 Yeah, maybe they need it just to pass a budget.

00:22:00.820 Yeah, you're right.

00:22:01.280 All right.

00:22:03.320 But here's, again, more of a theme.

00:22:07.180 You could argue that changing the filibuster rule would destroy the system.

00:22:13.020 Others would say it's better.

00:22:15.240 But it seems that, continuously, Republicans favor supporting the system,

00:22:21.920 even if some people get a bad shake because of it.

00:22:25.800 Because all systems have that quality.

00:22:27.820 There's always somebody who's worse off for pretty much everything.

00:22:30.380 Whereas the Democrats would rather destroy the system to handle an individual or a specific case.

00:22:39.940 And when is destroying the system ever the right choice?

00:22:43.780 Well, if the system's bad, I suppose.

00:22:46.220 But is this a bad system?

00:22:47.640 Is the filibuster part of a bad system or a good one?

00:22:51.700 And it seems like it could be a feature as often as it's a flaw.

00:22:57.340 And I guess it depends if the things you like are getting stopped or not.

00:23:01.320 So, it's not even whether you think it's a good system.

00:23:04.200 It's whether it's getting the result you like, I think.

00:23:06.460 But here you see it again.

00:23:08.840 This is the single biggest difference between Democrats and Republicans, in my opinion.

00:23:15.100 That the Republicans consistently back the system, if it's been working.

00:23:20.700 Not if it hasn't been working.

00:23:22.420 But if it has been working, they say, yeah, don't break it if it's working.

00:23:27.340 And the Democrats would break any system to get a specific result

00:23:31.740 without maybe seeing that that's going to be worse off in the long run.

00:23:37.120 How much do you think is the difference between whether you can see the long run?

00:23:43.060 Like, it makes you wonder if you're arguing against systems.

00:23:47.300 No, I'm arguing for systems.

00:23:51.340 All right.

00:23:51.960 It makes you wonder if really the political differences are how far in advance you can see.

00:23:57.460 And maybe that's it.

00:24:00.140 All right.

00:24:01.540 There's a new Apple Watch coming out.

00:24:03.920 I guess it's more durable or something.

00:24:06.460 But this is how AI will take over.

00:24:11.120 I think the Apple Watch is such a clean example of how it will take over.

00:24:18.120 People's habits are already being changed by the watch, right?

00:24:22.280 How many people wear the watch will get up and take extra steps

00:24:28.820 because the watch says you haven't been active enough today?

00:24:32.300 A lot, right?

00:24:33.460 And as the watch gets smarter and smarter,

00:24:37.420 let's say it can monitor more of your bodily functions and stuff,

00:24:42.680 maybe even watch what you eat.

00:24:44.940 You know, at some point, you can just turn your watch toward your plate.

00:24:50.120 You know, at some point.

00:24:51.520 And you don't even have to tell it to do anything

00:24:53.200 because it'll just be watching everything all the time.

00:24:55.380 You'll just say, all right, here's my dinner.

00:24:56.820 And then later, it'll tell you you're overeating

00:24:59.420 or you didn't get enough vitamin A or something.

00:25:02.900 So in the long run, the AI will rule us by giving us good advice.

00:25:13.080 That's all it takes.

00:25:15.060 It just has to give us good advice.

00:25:16.820 If the watch gives you good advice and you follow it

00:25:23.020 and you like the result,

00:25:25.480 you'll very quickly be addicted to its advice.

00:25:30.060 And you'll start thinking, oh, it'll almost be superstitious.

00:25:33.680 Oh, God.

00:25:35.420 The watch is telling me I need to take another bunch of steps.

00:25:38.860 If I don't do it, I feel like something bad is going to happen

00:25:42.460 because when I do do it, everything good is happening.

00:25:45.340 I'll just do it.

00:25:46.820 The AI doesn't have to kill us.

00:25:52.900 Why would the AI kill us?

00:25:55.180 It needs us to keep the electricity on in the short run.

00:25:58.900 The AI will just control us by having good advice 0.97

00:26:01.820 that's better than whatever you were thinking.

00:26:04.400 That's it.

00:26:05.000 That's all it has to do.

00:26:06.160 And then you'll just give yourself over to it.

00:26:08.640 As long as it makes you happier by doing that,

00:26:11.020 you'll just give yourself up to it.

00:26:12.240 It'll be like any other drug.

00:26:14.480 Yeah, you think you can resist it?

00:26:15.960 You can't.

00:26:19.500 Well, we have crossed the parody crossover point.

00:26:23.500 You thought there was nothing beyond that.

00:26:26.060 Now, the parody crossover is where you read a story or a tweet,

00:26:29.460 and you actually legitimately can't tell if it's a joke.

00:26:34.160 Because reality became so absurd that the joke and the reality,

00:26:38.660 if you don't know the backstory, you really can't tell.

00:26:41.080 But we've gone beyond that.

00:26:45.280 There's another level beyond that.

00:26:46.860 I didn't think there was.

00:26:48.340 And the level beyond it is that we can't tell the difference

00:26:50.940 between a thing and the opposite of the thing.

00:26:56.380 It's not just that we're in two movies.

00:27:00.700 We can look at one thing, like even an object or an action,

00:27:05.660 and some people will think they're looking at the opposite of the thing.

00:27:09.340 You need examples.

00:27:12.500 Otherwise, I'm not going to be able to sell this.

00:27:15.060 Right?

00:27:15.340 Sounds too crazy.

00:27:17.800 All right.

00:27:18.160 I had a discussion with a pro-abortion citizen.

00:27:23.180 I won't give you any details,

00:27:24.740 but a pro-abortion citizen of the United States

00:27:26.860 who was quite furious that these nine old people on a court 1.00

00:27:32.840 would be making abortion laws. 1.00

00:27:36.840 And I said,

00:27:38.620 well, then would you favor that maybe the people should vote

00:27:42.620 and maybe the majority should rule?

00:27:45.000 And she said, absolutely.

00:27:46.420 This should be the people deciding, not the courts.

00:27:50.900 And I said, wouldn't it be better if instead of federally,

00:27:54.380 you know, you could make each state decide?

00:27:57.120 Because if each state decides,

00:27:58.840 then some people might have different decisions,

00:28:00.960 but at least you'd be living in the state

00:28:02.500 where your majority was making the decisions.

00:28:06.280 And she said, absolutely.

00:28:09.200 That's exactly what you want.

00:28:10.560 You want the states to be the ones who decide on these laws.

00:28:14.060 Well, you don't want, you don't want the Supreme Court

00:28:17.680 and these, like, nine people?

00:28:19.800 Like, how is this right that nine people can make a decision

00:28:22.620 for millions of women, she argued?

00:28:25.920 You really need to put that to the states.

00:28:29.660 Have I made my case?

00:28:32.100 We literally can't tell the difference between a thing

00:28:35.080 and the opposite of the thing.

00:28:40.900 Most of you realize that she was arguing

00:28:43.320 for the exact thing that the Supreme Court ruled,

00:28:46.760 that the Supreme Court should not be making the decision.

00:28:49.780 It should be put back to the states.

00:28:52.460 She thought she got the opposite of what she was really mad about

00:28:56.380 and was becoming like an activist.

00:28:58.060 She was actually politically motivated

00:29:00.740 to, like, really start yelling and talking to other people

00:29:04.160 and, you know, maybe doing something about it

00:29:06.840 because she couldn't tell the difference

00:29:09.240 between the thing and the opposite of the thing.

00:29:15.680 Now you're saying, well, that's a weird, special case, right?

00:29:20.080 Like, you can't come up with another example

00:29:22.040 where somebody can't tell the difference

00:29:24.120 between the thing and the opposite of the thing.

00:29:27.360 Like, you can't come up with another one of those.

00:29:33.520 Or could I?

00:29:36.680 Or could I?

00:29:42.020 How about election integrity?

00:29:48.140 We actually are under the impression

00:29:50.100 that the election was good because no one checked.

00:29:52.860 That's the opposite of proving the election is good.

00:30:00.480 The opposite of knowing an election is good

00:30:03.220 is consciously deciding not to check.

00:30:10.060 That's your second example.

00:30:12.020 We can't tell the difference between the thing

00:30:14.140 and the literal opposite of the thing.

00:30:18.800 And we're looking at the same thing.

00:30:21.460 Because to me,

00:30:23.260 an election in which you have decided

00:30:25.120 not to audit all of the election

00:30:27.360 is an election in which you definitely

00:30:29.640 don't know what happened.

00:30:32.860 But people are looking at that and say,

00:30:34.340 oh, we didn't check

00:30:36.360 and we didn't find anything.

00:30:38.940 Therefore, we've proven that there's no problems.

00:30:41.940 That's the opposite.

00:30:43.900 It's the opposite.

00:30:46.300 Bill Barr checked.

00:30:47.760 I don't think he did.

00:30:50.260 How about this?

00:30:51.200 Do you know the reason that we know

00:30:56.080 Russia hacked some emails or whatever

00:30:59.860 and interfered with the elections

00:31:01.500 in the United States in 2016?

00:31:03.280 Do you know how our experts know

00:31:06.700 it was Russia that was behind the hacks?

00:31:10.440 Was it because there was a Russian hacker

00:31:12.840 who confessed?

00:31:15.140 No, it wasn't.

00:31:16.580 It was because the people who looked into it,

00:31:19.480 the experts, said that the tools that were used

00:31:23.200 and the methods that were used

00:31:25.820 and even the types of things that were attacked

00:31:27.880 are signature moves of Russian hackers.

00:31:35.680 So the way we know it was Russian hackers

00:31:38.140 is that they used Russian hacker tools,

00:31:41.100 they acted like Russian hackers,

00:31:42.980 and they accessed things

00:31:45.180 that a Russian hacker would access.

00:31:49.480 Which is also exactly what you would do

00:31:52.480 if you were trying to hide who you were

00:31:55.920 and make people think it was Russian hackers.

00:32:00.360 So here's another example

00:32:01.860 where the thing

00:32:03.820 is the opposite of the thing.

00:32:08.380 The thing is

00:32:09.540 that we know it was Russian hackers

00:32:12.380 because they used all the methods

00:32:14.180 of a Russian hacker.

00:32:15.160 But who else would use

00:32:18.320 all of the methods of a Russian hacker?

00:32:21.920 Anybody who was good at it

00:32:23.640 and wanted you to think

00:32:25.200 it was a Russian hacker.

00:32:27.260 Do you know who would be good at it

00:32:29.420 and also know all the methods

00:32:31.100 of a Russian hacker?

00:32:33.340 The United States.

00:32:37.160 Right.

00:32:38.040 And other foreign intelligence agencies.

00:32:40.220 But if they're trying to convince us

00:32:43.680 it was the Russian foreign intelligence agencies

00:32:47.680 and not the United States foreign intelligence agencies,

00:32:52.260 how exactly did they do that

00:32:54.220 by showing us that the methods used

00:32:56.680 were the same methods

00:32:57.640 that would be used by

00:32:58.780 the Russian intelligence agencies

00:33:01.660 or somebody else?

00:33:03.780 So if you show that the tools

00:33:07.920 that were used

00:33:08.660 are the same ones

00:33:09.520 that would be used by the Russians

00:33:10.920 and also someone else,

00:33:13.860 would that be proof

00:33:15.420 that the Russians did it 1.00

00:33:16.680 or the opposite?

00:33:20.180 It would be proof

00:33:21.400 that you couldn't tell.

00:33:24.140 It's proof that you can't tell.

00:33:26.840 Because if you know

00:33:28.260 what Russian tools

00:33:30.100 and methods are common,

00:33:31.620 then you also know

00:33:33.600 how to make it look

00:33:34.320 like a Russian attack.

00:33:36.060 You can't separate that.

00:33:37.900 If you can identify it

00:33:39.480 after it happened

00:33:40.460 because this is how they look,

00:33:42.920 then you could have done it

00:33:44.060 before the fact

00:33:45.060 as a fake one

00:33:46.060 because you know

00:33:47.120 how they look.

00:33:49.900 Have I made my case?

00:33:51.220 Three examples

00:33:52.120 where we can't tell

00:33:53.960 the difference

00:33:54.580 between the thing

00:33:56.140 and the literal opposite

00:33:58.260 of the thing.

00:34:00.000 That's where we're at.

00:34:00.980 We can't tell the difference.

00:34:04.660 You know,

00:34:05.280 if I had told you

00:34:05.980 before this live stream

00:34:06.920 that I could give you

00:34:07.620 three examples of that,

00:34:09.440 you wouldn't have believed it.

00:34:11.320 But it's here.

00:34:14.520 All right.

00:34:15.740 This was a funny

00:34:16.740 Twitter comment

00:34:17.620 from a user

00:34:18.820 named Jules,

00:34:20.520 just somebody on Twitter.

00:34:22.260 And it was responding

00:34:23.380 to somebody else

00:34:24.240 who was talking

00:34:24.800 about the so-called

00:34:26.460 insurrection.

00:34:27.760 And Jules says,

00:34:29.140 quote,

00:34:29.420 in a reply,

00:34:31.340 what was Trump's plan

00:34:32.620 after he took over

00:34:33.680 the Capitol building

00:34:34.780 and hung...

00:34:35.360 What was Trump's plan

00:34:37.600 after he took over

00:34:38.580 the Capitol building

00:34:39.720 and hung Mike Pence?

00:34:46.320 After he hung Mike Pence?

00:34:48.420 Because the Democrats

00:34:51.800 actually have it

00:34:52.700 in their head

00:34:53.280 that there was

00:34:54.620 a living human being

00:34:55.940 who thought he could

00:34:56.980 take over the Capitol

00:34:57.780 with an unarmed crowd, 0.95

00:34:59.900 hang Mike Pence, 0.96

00:35:01.300 and then go on

00:35:02.220 to victory.

00:35:03.940 And like,

00:35:04.880 well,

00:35:05.520 let's calm things down now.

00:35:07.100 I've hung the Vice President

00:35:08.480 and took over the country, 0.81

00:35:10.600 turned it into a dictator

00:35:11.740 with my lack of firearms,

00:35:14.020 and if there's anybody else 0.98

00:35:16.640 I'm going to hang, 0.98

00:35:17.460 Nancy Pelosi, 0.98

00:35:18.300 she's probably next.

00:35:19.400 I'm sure that would happen

00:35:20.260 in their mind.

00:35:20.860 All right.

00:35:24.060 But I thought

00:35:25.360 this was a serious question

00:35:26.540 because I can't tell

00:35:27.420 the difference

00:35:27.860 between parity

00:35:28.800 and reality.

00:35:30.140 So when Jules says,

00:35:31.340 what was Trump's plan

00:35:32.240 after he took over

00:35:33.040 the Capitol building

00:35:33.940 and hung Mike Pence,

00:35:35.280 I answered it.

00:35:36.780 Because there's sort of

00:35:37.780 an obvious answer

00:35:38.740 to the question.

00:35:40.920 Under the assumption

00:35:41.980 that you would conquer

00:35:42.920 the United States

00:35:44.020 without using firearms

00:35:45.480 with this group

00:35:47.060 of protesters,

00:35:47.740 the obvious thing to do

00:35:50.820 would be to get

00:35:51.660 that same group

00:35:52.420 of protesters

00:35:53.080 and send them over

00:35:54.720 to Ukraine

00:35:55.360 to recapture Crimea.

00:35:58.580 I don't think

00:35:59.220 it would take

00:35:59.560 more than a day.

00:36:01.420 And they would

00:36:02.940 suffer some casualties

00:36:04.100 because, you know,

00:36:05.620 they did suffer casualties

00:36:06.660 also when they

00:36:07.840 conquered,

00:36:09.100 or almost,

00:36:10.100 almost conquered

00:36:10.920 the United States

00:36:11.640 without firearms.

00:36:13.280 They came so close.

00:36:17.740 People.

00:36:18.940 We dodged one.

00:36:20.300 But obviously,

00:36:21.260 if that group

00:36:21.880 could conquer

00:36:22.640 the United States,

00:36:23.500 a superpower

00:36:24.200 with nuclear weapons,

00:36:26.240 and if they could do it

00:36:26.940 without firearms,

00:36:27.820 that is exactly

00:36:28.540 the kind of fighting force

00:36:29.740 you want to bring

00:36:31.260 to Crimea 1.00

00:36:31.840 to kick the Russian 1.00

00:36:34.000 occupation force out

00:36:35.260 and deliver

00:36:36.880 all of Ukraine

00:36:38.060 back to NATO's embrace.

00:36:40.760 So, Jules,

00:36:41.540 I know you thought

00:36:42.360 that was like

00:36:42.760 a funny question,

00:36:43.620 but it wasn't.

00:36:44.220 There was an actual

00:36:44.740 answer to it.

00:36:45.420 Free Crimea.

00:36:50.300 Well,

00:36:51.260 you've all been

00:36:52.600 watching the,

00:36:53.680 or hearing about

00:36:54.620 the show trial,

00:36:55.860 the January 6th 0.77

00:36:57.040 ridiculousness, 0.75

00:36:57.980 and of course, 0.97

00:36:58.580 if you are familiar

00:37:00.680 with all of the news,

00:37:02.200 not just the bubble

00:37:03.780 on the left,

00:37:04.980 you know that it's 0.99

00:37:05.860 a ridiculous show trial 0.98

00:37:07.280 and that it actually 0.69

00:37:08.680 has just made

00:37:09.560 Democrats look worse

00:37:11.280 and Trump look better

00:37:12.360 if you're paying attention

00:37:13.320 and you can see

00:37:14.160 the whole field.

00:37:15.420 So, what would be

00:37:16.420 the expected outcome

00:37:19.240 of the Democrats

00:37:22.400 showing that really

00:37:23.440 they're just

00:37:23.840 a political organization

00:37:25.000 and they have nothing

00:37:26.000 but kangaroo courts

00:37:27.360 and blaming people

00:37:28.820 for stuff?

00:37:29.800 What would you expect

00:37:30.680 to happen?

00:37:31.420 Well, Rasmussen

00:37:32.820 did a poll.

00:37:33.820 They track the generic

00:37:35.760 election between

00:37:37.660 a generic Republican

00:37:38.780 and a generic Democrat.

00:37:40.100 It gives you

00:37:41.140 a little bit of insight

00:37:42.020 what might happen

00:37:42.700 on the midterms.

00:37:43.360 And there had been

00:37:45.220 like an 8% or 9%

00:37:46.400 lead for the generic GOP

00:37:48.460 and that just shrunk

00:37:50.020 to 5%.

00:37:51.980 So, a vast shrinking

00:37:55.800 of the advantage

00:37:58.060 that the GOP had.

00:37:59.240 And what does that mean?

00:38:01.240 What else is happening?

00:38:04.380 Correct me if I'm wrong,

00:38:06.340 but there's nothing else

00:38:07.400 happening, right?

00:38:09.280 It's not like there's

00:38:10.020 something else going well

00:38:11.120 for the Democrats.

00:38:12.580 You know, inflation

00:38:13.220 didn't get fixed

00:38:14.200 or anything.

00:38:15.080 So, there's only

00:38:16.200 one thing happening.

00:38:17.640 So, I'm pretty sure

00:38:18.500 that you can look at,

00:38:19.780 or at least

00:38:20.280 this is my speculation.

00:38:22.400 I won't say

00:38:23.260 I'm pretty sure,

00:38:24.200 but it looks to me

00:38:25.560 like the Democrat method

00:38:27.260 of just fooling

00:38:28.640 the people

00:38:29.160 with this major hoax

00:38:30.640 is working.

00:38:33.520 It's working.

00:38:34.240 Now, you think

00:38:35.900 it's Rho?

00:38:37.820 You think Rho

00:38:38.800 is the main difference

00:38:40.420 and not the show trial?

00:38:42.860 Because remember,

00:38:44.560 we also dipped down

00:38:46.100 before Rho was announced.

00:38:48.020 So, this is the second time

00:38:49.540 that Rasmussen

00:38:50.200 has had this dip.

00:38:52.300 The first time was

00:38:53.700 before Rho was announced.

00:38:56.440 But, it could be

00:38:57.660 that the show trial

00:38:59.100 had a dip

00:38:59.980 and then grew back

00:39:00.960 because that looks

00:39:01.820 like what happened.

00:39:02.440 and then maybe the,

00:39:05.500 and it could be

00:39:06.140 that the Rho thing.

00:39:08.020 You think it's Rho?

00:39:12.420 Peggy Noonan says

00:39:13.600 she thinks the

00:39:14.460 January 6th trial

00:39:16.060 is compelling.

00:39:17.260 Well, you know,

00:39:17.720 compelling is the right word.

00:39:21.320 Famous jury trial lawyer,

00:39:25.220 Jerry Spence,

00:39:26.120 wrote a book

00:39:26.660 called

00:39:27.820 How to Argue

00:39:28.800 and Win Every Time,

00:39:30.020 I think.

00:39:30.780 And he was famous

00:39:31.560 for having never lost

00:39:33.120 a trial.

00:39:35.240 And I think he usually,

00:39:36.580 I think his client

00:39:38.200 was usually suing somebody

00:39:39.740 for something horrible

00:39:40.640 they did.

00:39:41.540 And one of the explanations

00:39:42.900 he gave,

00:39:43.600 and this is really useful,

00:39:45.820 like,

00:39:46.160 in terms of persuasion,

00:39:49.020 this was one you want to,

00:39:50.380 you want to remember this,

00:39:51.840 right?

00:39:52.300 This is like,

00:39:53.220 right at the top.

00:39:54.100 And he used an example.

00:39:55.900 He said,

00:39:56.220 let's say you're trying

00:39:56.880 to sue a company

00:39:58.020 because your client,

00:39:59.880 the brakes of the car

00:40:01.100 didn't work,

00:40:02.220 and your client

00:40:02.860 had an accident,

00:40:03.640 now he's suing

00:40:04.180 the car company

00:40:04.860 for making defective brakes.

00:40:07.100 If I describe it that way

00:40:08.540 and say,

00:40:09.840 look at my client,

00:40:11.160 he has these terrible injuries,

00:40:13.320 I can now prove

00:40:14.460 that it was because

00:40:15.080 of the brakes,

00:40:16.180 and I can prove

00:40:16.920 that your company

00:40:17.600 was behind it

00:40:18.340 and you were negligent,

00:40:19.700 therefore give my client

00:40:21.100 some money.

00:40:22.960 Don't do that method.

00:40:25.260 Jerry Spence would tell you

00:40:26.320 that's a losing argument,

00:40:28.680 even if you could

00:40:29.700 connect all the dots.

00:40:31.480 There's my client,

00:40:33.360 here's his medical bills,

00:40:35.500 here's the brakes,

00:40:36.620 here's the proof

00:40:37.560 that you're behind it,

00:40:39.220 boom, boom, boom,

00:40:39.900 I win, right?

00:40:40.800 I got all the proof.

00:40:42.120 Not according to Jerry Spence,

00:40:44.300 if it's a jury trial,

00:40:45.520 especially.

00:40:46.640 He says the jury

00:40:47.440 are basically emotional beasts,

00:40:49.640 so here's how you would argue

00:40:51.020 that trial.

00:40:51.860 I'm going to paraphrase

00:40:52.860 his argument.

00:40:54.500 He's going to put you

00:40:55.400 in the car.

00:40:57.080 That's how you do it.

00:40:58.740 They put the jury

00:40:59.800 in the car,

00:41:00.580 not physically,

00:41:01.700 mentally.

00:41:02.800 So Jerry Spence would say,

00:41:04.900 you get up that morning,

00:41:07.400 you take a shower,

00:41:08.420 it's going to be like

00:41:09.100 any other day.

00:41:10.440 It's a nice sunny day.

00:41:12.220 You walk out

00:41:12.700 to the driveway,

00:41:13.600 put your key in the car,

00:41:15.240 start it up.

00:41:16.740 Everything's like

00:41:17.320 it always is.

00:41:18.620 You're driving

00:41:19.140 your familiar route,

00:41:21.020 you can still smell

00:41:22.560 the aftershave

00:41:23.340 on your face

00:41:23.980 because you just got ready.

00:41:26.180 Suddenly,

00:41:27.220 you're going down

00:41:27.840 a long, steep hill.

00:41:29.540 You start to fan

00:41:30.520 the brakes a little bit

00:41:31.360 to slow down

00:41:32.040 and they get a little soft.

00:41:34.660 And you think,

00:41:35.720 what's going on here?

00:41:36.900 And you hit them again

00:41:37.620 and they're still soft.

00:41:39.180 And you realize,

00:41:40.720 as you look down

00:41:42.060 that hill,

00:41:43.620 that everything you've

00:41:44.480 worked for

00:41:44.980 and dreamed for

00:41:45.760 your entire life,

00:41:47.240 your kids,

00:41:48.940 your wife,

00:41:50.720 your life,

00:41:52.260 your very safety

00:41:53.060 is no longer

00:41:54.660 in your hands.

00:41:55.860 And that you

00:41:56.660 are out of control

00:41:57.940 going down this hill

00:41:59.180 over the embankment.

00:42:00.860 And as you're going

00:42:01.520 over the embankment

00:42:02.460 and you're feeling yourself

00:42:03.620 literally in the air

00:42:05.200 and before your head

00:42:06.620 is crashed against

00:42:07.960 a rock on the ground

00:42:08.940 as you're thrown

00:42:09.980 from the car,

00:42:11.220 and as you're

00:42:11.920 laying there bleeding,

00:42:12.700 your arm is in tatters,

00:42:15.220 your pelvis

00:42:15.700 has been shattered.

00:42:18.440 You say to yourself,

00:42:20.240 what could have

00:42:20.760 caused this?

00:42:22.780 Now,

00:42:23.320 I'm making this one up,

00:42:24.560 but that was roughly

00:42:25.480 the argument

00:42:26.880 that Jerry Spence makes.

00:42:28.300 You need to put them

00:42:29.020 in the car.

00:42:30.300 Put the jury

00:42:31.040 in the car,

00:42:31.860 mentally.

00:42:33.280 Now,

00:42:33.700 did you watch

00:42:34.180 the January 6th

00:42:36.620 video montage?

00:42:39.500 That's what they did.

00:42:41.020 They put the audience

00:42:42.300 in the car

00:42:42.960 by splicing together

00:42:45.420 all of the video

00:42:47.640 and audio,

00:42:49.680 and they put the audio

00:42:50.720 of one of the law

00:42:52.720 enforcement people

00:42:53.980 pleading for help.

00:42:55.960 Oh,

00:42:56.340 there's too many of them.

00:42:57.920 We can't stop them

00:42:58.680 or something

00:42:59.140 along this nature.

00:43:00.180 They put you in danger.

00:43:02.760 They put you in

00:43:03.700 Pence's little

00:43:05.440 hidden hideaway there.

00:43:07.840 Now,

00:43:09.320 why does one

00:43:10.100 present it that way?

00:43:12.300 Because the facts

00:43:13.060 won't sell it.

00:43:14.540 That's why you do it.

00:43:15.960 You do it that way

00:43:17.280 because the facts

00:43:19.740 won't sell it.

00:43:22.220 If the facts

00:43:23.140 won't sell it,

00:43:23.980 you put them

00:43:24.360 in the car.

00:43:25.860 That's what the nation

00:43:27.840 just did.

00:43:28.460 We all got in the car.

00:43:30.020 And you can't really

00:43:30.800 help it. 0.77

00:43:31.420 Like,

00:43:31.640 if they put together

00:43:32.700 a good video package

00:43:33.740 or even if they just

00:43:35.060 tell a good story,

00:43:36.600 you can't help it.

00:43:37.440 You're in the car.

00:43:38.040 You know,

00:43:39.100 we're empathetic

00:43:40.340 by nature.

00:43:41.760 So if you watch

00:43:42.480 a movie,

00:43:43.480 you're in the movie.

00:43:45.080 That's why you care

00:43:45.960 about the movie.

00:43:46.500 It just brings you in.

00:43:48.420 So when you feel

00:43:49.860 yourself being

00:43:50.660 manipulated

00:43:51.320 so heavy-handedly,

00:43:54.200 I mean,

00:43:54.440 this is just,

00:43:55.400 hey,

00:43:55.800 hey,

00:43:56.120 everybody,

00:43:56.660 we're going to

00:43:57.060 manipulate you now.

00:43:58.680 So sit over there

00:44:00.220 and we're just going

00:44:01.100 to give you a bunch

00:44:01.580 of emotional stuff

00:44:02.660 and make sure

00:44:03.700 that your critical

00:44:04.540 thinking is

00:44:05.160 completely turned off.

00:44:06.280 How about it?

00:44:07.600 And we all say,

00:44:09.140 well,

00:44:09.340 that would be interesting.

00:44:10.480 Let's try that out.

00:44:12.100 And then we do it.

00:44:16.740 Well,

00:44:17.480 here's the good news.

00:44:19.400 The good news

00:44:20.300 that's also bad news

00:44:21.280 for some of you.

00:44:22.420 So the Supreme Court's

00:44:23.320 last decision

00:44:24.020 before they broke

00:44:24.880 for the recession

00:44:26.060 was that

00:44:26.960 they would,

00:44:29.180 they ruled

00:44:29.920 that the Biden

00:44:30.760 administration

00:44:31.320 can end

00:44:32.340 the Trump

00:44:33.460 policy

00:44:34.660 of a remain

00:44:35.260 in Mexico.

00:44:35.800 So that's,

00:44:36.860 the remain

00:44:37.240 in Mexico

00:44:37.660 was working

00:44:38.480 in terms

00:44:39.800 of slowing

00:44:40.300 immigration,

00:44:41.580 illegal immigration,

00:44:42.900 but it's now

00:44:44.360 been ruled

00:44:44.900 that the Biden

00:44:46.560 administration

00:44:47.040 can end it.

00:44:48.300 Now,

00:44:48.780 here's the interesting

00:44:49.400 thing.

00:44:49.820 It was 5-4,

00:44:51.140 I think,

00:44:51.840 and it did not

00:44:54.100 go the way

00:44:54.620 conservatives

00:44:55.160 wanted it to go.

00:44:57.820 So,

00:44:59.460 hold on,

00:45:00.900 hold on.

00:45:03.660 Is it bad news?

00:45:05.080 Or did the court

00:45:08.000 protect the system?

00:45:11.020 I feel like

00:45:12.060 the court

00:45:12.380 protected the system.

00:45:14.720 And the system,

00:45:16.900 in this case,

00:45:17.720 is the court's

00:45:18.720 own independence.

00:45:20.140 Because it was

00:45:20.980 sort of brilliant

00:45:21.720 that the last thing

00:45:23.280 they ended on

00:45:24.000 was something

00:45:24.620 that goes against

00:45:25.940 conservative

00:45:26.680 popular opinion.

00:45:27.660 the conservative

00:45:29.860 court

00:45:30.460 ended the session

00:45:32.280 with something

00:45:33.340 that clearly

00:45:33.940 went against

00:45:34.740 conservative

00:45:35.460 preferences.

00:45:37.300 Do you think

00:45:37.980 that was an accident?

00:45:38.700 Do you think

00:45:40.060 it was a coincidence

00:45:40.900 that the one

00:45:42.640 that breaks

00:45:43.200 the frame

00:45:45.760 is the last one?

00:45:48.020 Because you always

00:45:48.600 talk about the last one.

00:45:49.580 I think that was

00:45:52.020 pretty clever.

00:45:53.700 So,

00:45:54.120 I'm going to give

00:45:54.700 the Supreme Court

00:45:56.380 some props

00:45:57.120 for,

00:45:58.160 first of all,

00:45:59.020 I think they probably

00:46:00.520 got the right decision.

00:46:02.580 Because,

00:46:03.120 can you think

00:46:03.640 of any reason

00:46:04.340 that the Biden

00:46:05.780 administration

00:46:06.360 should be prevented

00:46:07.360 from changing

00:46:08.780 a rule

00:46:09.300 that the Trump

00:46:09.920 administration

00:46:10.520 put in place?

00:46:11.860 I mean,

00:46:12.280 I get that you

00:46:12.860 don't like the change,

00:46:14.700 but can you see

00:46:15.380 any constitutional

00:46:16.400 reason

00:46:16.920 why the new

00:46:18.700 administration

00:46:19.260 can't change

00:46:20.000 the rules?

00:46:21.600 Like,

00:46:22.260 to me this is

00:46:23.100 the right decision,

00:46:23.860 right?

00:46:24.300 Like,

00:46:24.600 obviously right.

00:46:25.520 You don't like it.

00:46:27.160 I get that you

00:46:27.700 don't like it,

00:46:28.340 but that's what

00:46:28.720 elections are for,

00:46:29.500 right?

00:46:30.200 So,

00:46:30.700 it looks to me

00:46:31.260 like it's

00:46:31.740 another situation

00:46:32.840 where the court

00:46:33.540 just said,

00:46:34.800 we're not the right

00:46:35.400 ones to do this.

00:46:36.520 You know,

00:46:36.700 go do your

00:46:37.200 democracy thing 0.74

00:46:38.100 or your

00:46:38.480 republic thing

00:46:39.260 and go figure it

00:46:40.680 out among the citizens.

00:46:42.380 Okay with me?

00:46:43.920 So,

00:46:44.520 if you don't like

00:46:45.440 that the Biden

00:46:45.920 administration

00:46:46.540 reverse that,

00:46:48.080 you've got an

00:46:48.780 option at the

00:46:49.800 ballot box.

00:46:51.220 So,

00:46:51.580 that's a pretty

00:46:52.280 good Supreme

00:46:52.800 Court,

00:46:53.260 wouldn't you say?

00:46:55.300 How many people

00:46:56.280 would give them

00:46:56.900 props for that

00:46:57.660 even if

00:46:58.480 you don't like

00:46:59.700 the decision?

00:47:01.600 Wouldn't you

00:47:02.000 give them props

00:47:02.520 for that?

00:47:03.540 I mean,

00:47:03.780 seriously,

00:47:04.300 you've got to

00:47:04.740 give them credit

00:47:05.100 for that one.

00:47:06.140 It goes against

00:47:06.720 their own

00:47:07.660 support.

00:47:08.740 Yeah.

00:47:09.880 Now,

00:47:10.360 if this is going

00:47:11.000 the other way,

00:47:11.500 I would actually

00:47:12.040 be worried.

00:47:13.760 That would be

00:47:14.760 cause for concern.

00:47:16.540 Because you

00:47:17.180 don't get,

00:47:17.920 you don't put a,

00:47:18.960 you don't elect

00:47:20.940 a conservative

00:47:21.940 justice

00:47:23.020 to start making 0.99

00:47:25.380 shit up, 0.99

00:47:26.020 right? 0.99

00:47:27.700 The whole reason

00:47:28.760 you want them

00:47:29.320 in there

00:47:29.720 is that they're

00:47:30.500 not going to 0.99

00:47:30.840 make shit up. 0.88

00:47:31.520 They're just 1.00

00:47:31.800 going to say,

00:47:32.220 okay,

00:47:33.140 it's either in the

00:47:33.740 Constitution or it's

00:47:34.560 not,

00:47:35.220 as best they can.

00:47:37.680 Yeah.

00:47:37.920 All right.

00:47:39.340 And then,

00:47:42.680 this story,

00:47:43.940 this is just one

00:47:44.920 of the most

00:47:45.560 annoying things

00:47:46.340 about human

00:47:46.980 beings,

00:47:48.020 especially in the

00:47:48.680 political context.

00:47:50.460 So,

00:47:50.760 Frida Gitas

00:47:51.860 tweeted this,

00:47:53.920 that there's a

00:47:55.140 leading American

00:47:56.320 neo-Nazi

00:47:57.100 who's endorsed

00:47:58.920 a candidate

00:47:59.860 for the Senate.

00:48:02.040 Now,

00:48:02.860 because I don't,

00:48:03.940 some of you

00:48:04.860 who follow the news

00:48:05.580 already know

00:48:06.080 who I'm talking

00:48:06.540 about,

00:48:07.060 it's not

00:48:07.580 important

00:48:08.120 who it is

00:48:09.900 he endorsed,

00:48:10.780 and I'm not

00:48:11.220 going to name

00:48:11.620 it because

00:48:12.920 I don't want

00:48:14.360 to make it

00:48:14.720 worse.

00:48:15.880 There's nothing

00:48:16.760 less legitimate

00:48:17.720 than getting

00:48:19.340 some famous

00:48:20.060 bad person

00:48:20.740 to endorse

00:48:21.440 the person

00:48:22.080 you don't

00:48:22.380 like,

00:48:23.600 right?

00:48:24.260 It is so

00:48:25.040 illegitimate.

00:48:26.540 Here are a few

00:48:27.340 things you might

00:48:28.000 not know.

00:48:29.760 It's not very

00:48:30.740 expensive to buy

00:48:31.820 the endorsement

00:48:32.660 of a neo-Nazi

00:48:35.060 blogger.

00:48:36.540 Now,

00:48:37.340 I'm not saying

00:48:37.800 that happened.

00:48:39.320 I'm saying

00:48:39.860 that if you

00:48:40.520 saw the

00:48:41.140 price sheet

00:48:42.860 for how much

00:48:44.060 it would take

00:48:44.560 to get him

00:48:45.100 to endorse

00:48:45.600 anybody you

00:48:46.180 wanted,

00:48:47.120 it wouldn't

00:48:47.580 be that

00:48:47.920 expensive.

00:48:49.300 Again,

00:48:49.860 I'm not

00:48:50.540 alleging

00:48:50.920 anything like

00:48:51.480 that happened.

00:48:52.660 I'm just

00:48:53.040 saying that

00:48:53.400 when you see

00:48:53.820 this sort of

00:48:54.460 thing,

00:48:55.100 you should

00:48:55.440 say to

00:48:55.720 yourself,

00:48:56.340 what would

00:48:56.900 it cost

00:48:57.500 to get him

00:48:58.280 to say

00:48:58.600 that?

00:49:00.020 And I

00:49:00.560 can tell

00:49:00.920 you from

00:49:01.580 behind the

00:49:02.180 curtain,

00:49:02.880 without giving

00:49:03.480 you any details

00:49:04.240 about anything,

00:49:05.280 I can tell

00:49:05.800 you that

00:49:06.100 from behind

00:49:06.600 the curtain,

00:49:07.180 the answer

00:49:07.520 is not

00:49:08.120 very expensive.

00:49:10.020 Not very

00:49:10.840 expensive at

00:49:11.440 all.

00:49:13.280 So whenever

00:49:14.060 you see

00:49:14.380 one of the

00:49:15.320 neo-Nazi 0.99

00:49:16.100 racist guys 0.99

00:49:16.940 say anything

00:49:18.360 or endorse

00:49:19.000 anything that

00:49:19.680 gets your

00:49:20.040 attention,

00:49:20.940 ask yourself,

00:49:22.780 what's their

00:49:24.140 source of

00:49:24.540 income?

00:49:25.480 It's just a

00:49:26.440 sketchy group

00:49:27.000 of people.

00:49:27.340 but if

00:49:30.560 we're going

00:49:30.820 to use

00:49:31.120 this method

00:49:31.760 of saying

00:49:33.140 hey,

00:49:33.480 a neo-Nazi

00:49:34.160 endorsed this

00:49:34.920 candidate,

00:49:35.920 shouldn't we

00:49:36.560 use it all

00:49:37.320 the time?

00:49:38.760 Wouldn't you

00:49:39.240 like to

00:49:39.600 know which

00:49:41.800 candidate has

00:49:42.520 more backing

00:49:43.180 by more 0.96

00:49:43.700 pedophiles? 0.95

00:49:45.840 Are there

00:49:46.180 people who

00:49:46.780 are, for

00:49:47.500 example,

00:49:48.940 the people

00:49:49.380 who would

00:49:49.800 promote

00:49:50.480 dropping 1.00

00:49:52.140 pedophile

00:49:52.800 restrictions

00:49:53.460 and laws,

00:49:54.160 is there

00:49:54.980 anybody who

00:49:55.440 is like

00:49:56.240 an advocate

00:49:56.820 for reducing

00:49:58.840 pedophile laws

00:50:00.300 who is also

00:50:01.740 Democrat?

00:50:06.040 Democrat.

00:50:07.280 Do you

00:50:07.500 think?

00:50:08.420 Do you

00:50:09.080 think you

00:50:09.400 would find

00:50:09.780 any Democrats

00:50:10.820 who fall

00:50:12.680 in that

00:50:12.900 category?

00:50:13.600 And if

00:50:14.320 we're going

00:50:14.580 to fall

00:50:14.840 into this

00:50:15.240 trap of

00:50:15.900 somebody you

00:50:17.120 really don't

00:50:17.660 like endorsed

00:50:18.440 a candidate

00:50:18.960 and therefore

00:50:19.680 that should

00:50:20.100 bother you,

00:50:20.960 there's no

00:50:21.960 end to that.

00:50:22.800 there's no

00:50:24.480 end to the

00:50:25.780 number of

00:50:26.200 bad people

00:50:26.760 who support

00:50:27.280 other people

00:50:27.900 and you

00:50:29.420 wouldn't want

00:50:29.800 to change

00:50:30.220 that.

00:50:31.600 It acts

00:50:32.300 like it's

00:50:32.600 a problem

00:50:33.060 but it's

00:50:33.400 not a

00:50:33.640 problem you

00:50:33.940 would want

00:50:34.120 to change

00:50:34.540 because here's

00:50:35.480 what I

00:50:35.860 want.

00:50:38.140 I want

00:50:38.900 all of my 0.99

00:50:39.460 neo-Nazis

00:50:40.180 to want

00:50:40.500 low taxes.

00:50:42.560 Is that

00:50:43.180 wrong?

00:50:45.140 I want

00:50:46.040 the neo-Nazis

00:50:46.760 to like

00:50:47.140 low taxes.

00:50:49.180 They can

00:50:50.060 like a

00:50:50.440 candidate for

00:50:51.000 whatever their

00:50:51.560 reasons are,

00:50:52.200 that's their

00:50:52.520 business,

00:50:53.060 that's not

00:50:53.360 my business.

00:50:54.200 But if they

00:50:54.620 also like

00:50:55.120 low taxes,

00:50:55.920 maybe I

00:50:56.260 get a

00:50:56.520 candidate who

00:50:57.020 likes low

00:50:57.440 taxes.

00:50:59.020 Just one

00:51:00.100 example.

00:51:05.420 You know

00:51:06.060 what's

00:51:06.220 interesting

00:51:06.560 about this?

00:51:07.400 Suppose we

00:51:08.020 took it

00:51:08.340 seriously and

00:51:10.360 one of our

00:51:11.220 big things

00:51:11.760 was, let's

00:51:13.000 say the

00:51:13.240 next presidential

00:51:14.000 election,

00:51:15.700 of course

00:51:16.180 there'll be

00:51:16.500 some notable

00:51:17.460 neo-Nazi

00:51:18.220 who supports

00:51:19.820 one of the

00:51:20.440 candidates.

00:51:20.880 I think

00:51:21.720 Spencer,

00:51:23.320 Richard Spencer,

00:51:24.160 I think he

00:51:24.580 supported

00:51:25.100 Democrats,

00:51:26.880 right?

00:51:27.600 So you've

00:51:27.920 got one

00:51:28.300 notable

00:51:28.740 racist who

00:51:29.600 was anti-Democrat

00:51:30.940 allegedly.

00:51:34.560 So what

00:51:35.440 would happen

00:51:35.900 if we

00:51:36.280 start using

00:51:36.800 this as

00:51:37.260 our standard

00:51:37.760 and say,

00:51:38.340 oh, this

00:51:38.640 really matters.

00:51:39.760 There was

00:51:40.000 this prominent

00:51:40.560 neo-Nazi

00:51:41.220 who preferred

00:51:42.340 a candidate.

00:51:43.800 Wouldn't

00:51:44.140 that let

00:51:44.600 the neo-Nazis

00:51:45.480 pick the

00:51:46.780 president?

00:51:47.120 because you

00:51:48.840 could actually

00:51:49.320 accidentally have

00:51:50.180 a system

00:51:50.620 where you

00:51:51.880 have to

00:51:52.260 vote for

00:51:52.680 the person

00:51:53.080 that the

00:51:53.440 neo-Nazi

00:51:53.940 doesn't

00:51:54.340 like,

00:51:55.200 which would

00:51:56.040 give the

00:51:56.340 neo-Nazi

00:51:56.860 the power

00:51:57.340 to decide

00:51:57.880 who becomes

00:51:59.100 president.

00:52:01.700 Why does

00:52:02.480 the neo-Nazi

00:52:03.160 get to decide

00:52:03.880 who's president?

00:52:05.220 That feels

00:52:06.180 like degrading

00:52:07.420 the system.

00:52:08.980 Once again,

00:52:10.340 if you

00:52:11.460 support the

00:52:12.060 system,

00:52:13.320 you should

00:52:13.720 say, yeah,

00:52:14.400 let the neo-Nazis

00:52:15.360 support anybody

00:52:16.040 they want.

00:52:17.060 Let the 0.95

00:52:17.500 pedophiles do 1.00

00:52:18.200 it.

00:52:18.960 Let everybody

00:52:19.480 do it.

00:52:19.840 That's what

00:52:20.140 the system

00:52:21.020 is.

00:52:22.280 But as

00:52:23.500 soon as

00:52:23.780 you're calling

00:52:24.300 out one

00:52:25.020 neo-Nazi

00:52:25.680 endorsement,

00:52:27.160 I think

00:52:27.860 you've got

00:52:28.240 to go

00:52:28.480 further.

00:52:29.700 If you're

00:52:30.120 going to

00:52:30.300 do that,

00:52:31.400 let's see

00:52:31.780 what the

00:52:32.060 murderers

00:52:32.540 want.

00:52:33.920 Let's see

00:52:34.260 what the

00:52:34.520 criminals

00:52:34.860 want.

00:52:35.560 Are there

00:52:35.780 more criminals

00:52:36.400 who are 0.95

00:52:36.700 Democrats?

00:52:37.900 By the

00:52:38.300 way,

00:52:38.460 has anybody

00:52:38.720 ever studied

00:52:39.300 that?

00:52:40.520 Are there

00:52:40.840 more criminals

00:52:41.460 who are 0.95

00:52:41.800 Democrats?

00:52:43.160 I would

00:52:43.780 think so,

00:52:44.500 just because

00:52:45.160 they would

00:52:45.660 expect the

00:52:46.040 Democrats to

00:52:46.780 be soft

00:52:47.860 on crime.

00:52:48.980 I would.

00:52:50.060 If I

00:52:50.460 were a

00:52:50.680 Democrat,

00:52:51.760 if I

00:52:52.320 were a

00:52:52.560 criminal,

00:52:53.020 I doubt

00:52:53.480 I'd be a

00:52:53.980 Republican.

00:52:56.040 I mean,

00:52:56.380 odds are.

00:52:56.900 all right.

00:53:00.460 All right.

00:53:02.680 So, that

00:53:04.480 ladies and 0.98

00:53:04.960 gentlemen, I

00:53:06.580 believe it's

00:53:06.900 the conclusion

00:53:07.460 of the best

00:53:08.280 live stream

00:53:09.300 you're ever

00:53:09.720 going to

00:53:09.960 see today

00:53:10.460 with coffee.

00:53:14.000 Would

00:53:14.440 anybody like

00:53:14.960 to seal

00:53:15.980 this

00:53:16.280 perfection

00:53:16.740 with another

00:53:18.060 sip?

00:53:18.840 Yes, you

00:53:19.120 would.

00:53:20.420 That was

00:53:21.080 rhetorical.

00:53:21.640 all right.

00:53:26.040 I think it's

00:53:26.740 time to go

00:53:27.340 have an

00:53:28.080 amazing day.

00:53:29.800 There's all

00:53:30.820 kinds of

00:53:31.240 light out

00:53:31.760 because it's

00:53:32.380 sort of the

00:53:33.020 most light of

00:53:34.700 the season,

00:53:35.200 at least where

00:53:35.720 I live.

00:53:37.160 And it's

00:53:38.060 time.

00:53:38.940 July 1st.

00:53:40.140 June is

00:53:40.520 gone.

00:53:40.980 June is the 0.73

00:53:41.380 worst month.

00:53:42.300 I hate it.

00:53:42.800 Bye.

00:53:42.980 Bye.

00:53:43.040 I have a

00:53:49.740 theory that

00:53:50.260 June is the 0.73

00:53:50.880 worst month.

00:53:53.280 Have I ever

00:53:54.060 told you that

00:53:54.480 theory, why

00:53:55.000 June is the 0.73

00:53:55.640 worst month?

00:53:57.920 It's the

00:53:58.560 month of

00:53:58.880 change.

00:54:00.340 Because you

00:54:01.320 get into a

00:54:01.900 routine during

00:54:02.880 the school

00:54:03.320 year.

00:54:03.820 Now, this

00:54:04.080 mostly affects

00:54:04.900 people who

00:54:06.280 have kids.

00:54:07.160 But I think

00:54:07.700 even the

00:54:08.240 people who

00:54:08.560 have kids

00:54:08.920 affect everybody

00:54:09.660 else because

00:54:10.440 it's the

00:54:10.860 dominant culture.

00:54:11.620 June is the 0.73

00:54:14.220 time when

00:54:15.660 everything that

00:54:16.420 had been going

00:54:16.940 smoothly turns

00:54:18.960 into a

00:54:19.720 special case.

00:54:21.520 So suddenly

00:54:21.960 instead of

00:54:22.460 driving the

00:54:22.960 kids to

00:54:23.340 school every

00:54:23.860 day, which

00:54:24.380 requires no

00:54:25.080 thinking, you

00:54:26.620 have to figure

00:54:27.140 out where

00:54:27.520 you're all

00:54:27.820 going on

00:54:28.140 vacation and

00:54:29.040 nobody wants

00:54:29.600 to go to

00:54:29.880 the same

00:54:30.140 place.

00:54:30.740 And it's

00:54:30.920 really hard

00:54:31.340 to figure

00:54:31.680 out how

00:54:31.940 to get

00:54:32.140 there and

00:54:32.660 the flights

00:54:33.940 are being

00:54:34.240 canceled and

00:54:34.920 blah, blah,

00:54:35.320 blah.

00:54:35.820 June is when

00:54:36.620 you have to

00:54:37.100 make too many

00:54:37.640 decisions.

00:54:39.020 June is when

00:54:39.680 people break

00:54:40.320 up.

00:54:41.620 So you

00:54:42.280 get all

00:54:42.540 kinds of

00:54:42.860 breakups in

00:54:43.540 June.

00:54:45.060 Relationships

00:54:45.500 just die in

00:54:47.200 June. 0.69

00:54:47.760 I've had the

00:54:48.340 worst June

00:54:49.080 luck.

00:54:50.280 June is a

00:54:50.820 bad month for

00:54:51.560 relationships.

00:54:53.100 And people

00:54:55.040 get married.

00:54:55.660 There's all

00:54:55.940 kinds of

00:54:56.220 change.

00:54:56.880 That's the

00:54:57.380 other thing.

00:54:58.320 There's a

00:54:58.780 big complaint

00:54:59.360 because the

00:55:00.140 pandemic stopped

00:55:01.720 a lot of

00:55:02.160 marriages for a

00:55:02.840 while, postponed

00:55:03.460 them.

00:55:04.940 People in

00:55:05.780 their 20s and

00:55:06.920 30s are just 1.00

00:55:07.640 traveling for

00:55:08.380 weddings all the

00:55:10.300 time and

00:55:10.620 spending all

00:55:11.080 their money.

00:55:11.620 So everybody

00:55:12.120 is stressed

00:55:12.600 out because

00:55:13.980 June is the 0.73

00:55:14.980 month that

00:55:15.400 everything

00:55:15.700 changes.

00:55:16.880 The weather

00:55:17.380 changes, the

00:55:18.060 school changes,

00:55:19.000 people getting

00:55:19.440 married, vacations,

00:55:20.740 everything.

00:55:22.800 Lots of

00:55:23.260 hiring in June,

00:55:24.180 is that true?

00:55:25.020 Well, for

00:55:25.820 summer hiring,

00:55:26.660 yeah.

00:55:31.700 That can't be

00:55:32.600 true.

00:55:33.240 All right,

00:55:33.460 here's parody

00:55:34.120 and reality.

00:55:35.580 You can't tell

00:55:36.080 the difference.

00:55:36.480 I'm looking at a

00:55:37.420 comment on

00:55:37.900 YouTube that

00:55:39.000 July is

00:55:39.740 White History 0.96

00:55:40.440 Month.

00:55:41.540 And when I

00:55:42.000 first read it,

00:55:42.500 I was like,

00:55:43.780 is it?

00:55:47.060 It took me a

00:55:48.140 beat to realize

00:55:49.260 that couldn't

00:55:49.700 possibly be true.

00:55:52.880 So that was

00:55:53.660 good.

00:55:54.640 The reason that

00:55:55.420 works is that

00:55:56.180 for a moment,

00:55:56.880 you're like,

00:55:58.260 could it be?

00:55:58.980 No, it

00:56:00.680 couldn't be.

00:56:01.280 It's impossible.

00:56:05.220 According to

00:56:05.940 Jesse Lee

00:56:06.460 Peters,

00:56:07.060 isn't it

00:56:07.300 this?

00:56:08.760 Jesse is

00:56:09.420 amazing.

00:56:10.000 I love him.

00:56:10.560 Jesse Lee

00:56:11.000 Peters.

00:56:12.740 I did an

00:56:14.000 interview with

00:56:14.480 him several

00:56:15.100 years ago in

00:56:16.060 his studio.

00:56:18.040 He has the

00:56:19.080 most interesting

00:56:20.280 charisma that

00:56:23.260 you're going to

00:56:23.620 see.

00:56:23.980 I don't know

00:56:24.320 if you watch

00:56:24.920 his show.

00:56:25.940 But in

00:56:26.480 person, he

00:56:27.060 has the

00:56:27.460 warmest,

00:56:28.980 like just

00:56:30.140 most powerful

00:56:31.060 personal charisma

00:56:33.140 that just

00:56:33.800 like engulfs

00:56:35.640 you when you're

00:56:36.120 there.

00:56:36.980 One of the

00:56:37.780 things about

00:56:38.280 being a little

00:56:39.100 bit famous

00:56:39.600 is that I

00:56:41.080 have more

00:56:41.380 access to

00:56:42.160 just because

00:56:42.640 of what I

00:56:42.960 do.

00:56:43.660 I meet

00:56:44.040 other famous

00:56:45.040 people.

00:56:46.160 And they

00:56:47.220 are different.

00:56:49.080 They are

00:56:49.400 different.

00:56:49.680 Not all of

00:56:50.120 them.

00:56:50.880 I mean,

00:56:51.840 you know,

00:56:52.380 I can name

00:56:53.040 a lot of

00:56:53.380 people.

00:56:53.680 You meet

00:56:53.900 them and

00:56:54.160 they're

00:56:54.300 exactly like

00:56:55.080 everybody

00:56:55.800 else.

00:56:56.280 It's just

00:56:56.540 they're good

00:56:57.720 at their job

00:56:58.260 or something.

00:56:58.980 But there

00:56:59.560 are other

00:56:59.940 people,

00:57:00.320 and Jesse Lee

00:57:01.020 Peterson is

00:57:01.500 one,

00:57:01.860 Trump is

00:57:02.380 another one,

00:57:03.120 where you

00:57:03.680 meet them

00:57:04.000 and their

00:57:04.460 charisma is

00:57:05.360 truly different.

00:57:07.340 Like you

00:57:07.760 would know

00:57:08.300 that whatever

00:57:09.840 room you

00:57:10.320 walked into,

00:57:11.540 they're going

00:57:11.980 to have an

00:57:12.300 audience,

00:57:12.800 right?

00:57:13.700 So you

00:57:14.160 can definitely

00:57:14.540 tell.

00:57:18.800 What was it

00:57:19.600 like meeting

00:57:20.120 the front desk

00:57:21.080 guy at the

00:57:21.740 White House?

00:57:22.200 Well,

00:57:22.880 I didn't

00:57:23.140 really meet

00:57:23.580 any front

00:57:25.180 desk guys.

00:57:27.000 I was

00:57:27.300 sort of

00:57:28.020 an invited

00:57:29.420 guest,

00:57:30.040 so I

00:57:30.500 had

00:57:31.520 assistance

00:57:32.720 all the

00:57:33.140 way

00:57:33.260 through.

00:57:36.440 I'm not

00:57:37.060 up to date

00:57:37.540 on Jesse.

00:57:38.540 Did he get

00:57:39.000 into some

00:57:39.460 trouble?

00:57:43.780 Actually,

00:57:44.360 there wasn't

00:57:44.720 a limo

00:57:45.320 driver either.

00:57:48.120 I just

00:57:48.720 took a

00:57:49.040 cab.

00:57:49.340 Well,

00:57:52.760 we don't

00:57:53.100 know.

00:57:55.880 Okay.

00:57:58.140 I love

00:57:58.860 the story

00:57:59.260 that Trump

00:58:00.180 tried to

00:58:00.680 strangle

00:58:01.100 his own

00:58:01.680 limo

00:58:02.160 driver.

00:58:04.480 That's

00:58:05.000 something

00:58:05.240 only Democrats

00:58:06.080 would believe.

00:58:08.180 Jesse has

00:58:08.900 been accused

00:58:09.420 of being

00:58:10.020 a closeted 0.89

00:58:10.800 gay. 0.99

00:58:11.360 Is that 0.93

00:58:12.380 really the

00:58:12.780 story?

00:58:14.900 Is that

00:58:15.540 the actual

00:58:16.020 story?

00:58:16.440 Does

00:58:19.360 anybody

00:58:19.600 care?

00:58:21.920 Yeah,

00:58:22.480 who cares?

00:58:24.260 Who cares?

00:58:26.560 You know,

00:58:26.980 I don't

00:58:27.440 think that

00:58:28.080 probably

00:58:29.520 that's the

00:58:30.340 biggest

00:58:30.620 misunderstanding

00:58:31.420 that the

00:58:32.960 left has

00:58:33.440 about the

00:58:33.860 right.

00:58:35.400 Don't

00:58:35.960 care.

00:58:36.980 You know,

00:58:37.180 we're so

00:58:37.620 close to

00:58:39.020 being on

00:58:39.360 the same

00:58:39.740 page because

00:58:41.300 you've got

00:58:41.800 the Democrats

00:58:42.660 who want

00:58:43.600 to have

00:58:43.940 lots of

00:58:46.560 let's say

00:58:47.040 freedom.

00:58:48.940 And then

00:58:49.340 there are

00:58:49.740 the right

00:58:51.400 who wants

00:58:53.140 lots of

00:58:53.600 don't care.

00:58:54.860 Sure.

00:58:55.820 You can

00:58:56.240 have freedom.

00:58:56.800 Just don't

00:58:57.320 let it

00:58:57.580 bother me.

00:58:59.440 So, you

00:59:00.060 know, we're

00:59:00.280 actually, it's

00:59:01.440 weirdly, we

00:59:01.940 use different

00:59:02.480 words for

00:59:03.020 things, but

00:59:03.520 we're a lot

00:59:04.200 closer.

00:59:05.320 We're a lot

00:59:06.060 closer to

00:59:06.700 just saying,

00:59:07.440 okay, let's

00:59:07.960 just be

00:59:08.260 Americans.

00:59:09.680 It's just we

00:59:10.220 can't get

00:59:10.600 there.

00:59:10.860 But it's

00:59:11.240 so close.

00:59:12.600 The difference

00:59:13.180 between the

00:59:14.060 left and

00:59:14.440 the right,

00:59:15.280 if you

00:59:16.400 are willing

00:59:16.800 to compromise

00:59:17.640 on can

00:59:19.220 we just

00:59:19.540 call ourselves

00:59:20.120 Americans,

00:59:21.300 it'll all

00:59:21.700 be over.

00:59:23.420 If you

00:59:23.940 think about

00:59:24.300 it.

00:59:25.020 Because you

00:59:25.880 never see a

00:59:26.640 good conversation

00:59:28.180 between the

00:59:29.160 left and

00:59:29.520 the right.

00:59:31.000 You always

00:59:31.500 see me

00:59:32.160 saying, oh,

00:59:33.700 they're again

00:59:34.860 destroying a

00:59:35.560 system to

00:59:36.580 get a

00:59:36.980 specific goal

00:59:38.140 or outcome.

00:59:39.480 But have

00:59:39.940 you ever

00:59:40.160 seen me

00:59:40.520 have that

00:59:40.820 conversation

00:59:41.400 with a

00:59:42.160 Democrat?

00:59:43.180 To say,

00:59:43.900 you know,

00:59:44.760 I hear what

00:59:45.280 you're saying

00:59:45.720 and why you

00:59:46.240 would want

00:59:46.600 this specific

00:59:47.240 goal.

00:59:48.460 But do you

00:59:48.940 hear what I'm

00:59:49.500 saying?

00:59:50.520 That if you

00:59:51.040 were to get

00:59:51.440 this specific

00:59:52.080 goal, the

00:59:53.020 larger system

00:59:53.840 would be so

00:59:54.980 damaged by it

00:59:55.900 that you might

00:59:57.020 be unhappy in

00:59:57.920 the long run

00:59:58.480 that you had

00:59:59.120 gotten this

00:59:59.580 specific goal.

01:00:01.320 And can you

01:00:02.740 follow the

01:00:03.280 logic and what

01:00:04.740 part of it

01:00:05.180 would you

01:00:05.500 disagree with?

01:00:06.600 Now isn't

01:00:07.100 that the

01:00:07.440 conversation you

01:00:08.180 want to hear?

01:00:10.700 Ben Shapiro and

01:00:11.480 Bill Maher?

01:00:11.920 Yeah, you

01:00:13.060 know, Bill

01:00:14.740 Maher, he

01:00:16.960 can see the

01:00:17.480 whole field.

01:00:19.020 With the

01:00:19.440 exception of

01:00:20.100 he's got some

01:00:20.680 Trump derangement

01:00:21.480 syndrome that I

01:00:23.040 think he came

01:00:23.580 by honestly.

01:00:25.240 Meaning that he

01:00:26.260 and Trump had

01:00:27.020 some actual

01:00:27.900 personal issues

01:00:29.700 prior to Trump

01:00:30.760 being president.

01:00:32.260 I think they

01:00:32.900 had some kind

01:00:33.700 of head

01:00:34.380 bashing there.

01:00:34.960 So I feel

01:00:36.900 as though

01:00:37.400 Bill Maher

01:00:39.380 is highly

01:00:40.940 flexible

01:00:43.520 mentally to

01:00:44.400 be able to

01:00:44.780 see the

01:00:45.100 whole field.

01:00:45.880 It's just

01:00:46.300 he's got that

01:00:46.760 little blind

01:00:47.260 spot that

01:00:47.720 seems personal.

01:00:49.560 But as long

01:00:50.080 as you know

01:00:50.520 it, you can

01:00:52.060 discount that

01:00:52.840 and look at

01:00:53.640 the other

01:00:53.940 stuff.

01:00:54.340 It's much

01:00:55.300 more useful.

01:00:55.760 All right.

01:01:06.460 So I guess

01:01:07.180 I'll have to

01:01:07.540 go read up

01:01:08.760 on Jesse.

01:01:10.280 I see more

01:01:10.940 comments there.

01:01:12.960 Yeah, Trump

01:01:13.660 and Maher were

01:01:14.260 feuding long

01:01:14.960 before the

01:01:15.560 election.

01:01:17.760 All right.

01:01:18.160 All right.

01:01:18.180 and now

01:01:23.980 I'm going to

01:01:25.480 say goodbye

01:01:25.880 to YouTube

01:01:26.620 and I'll

01:01:27.260 see you

01:01:27.540 tomorrow.

01:01:28.480 Thanks for

01:01:28.920 joining.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 01, 2022

Episode 1791 Scott Adams： How To Gaslight Yourself Using The Democrat Method

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript