Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1804 Scott Adams： John Bolton Destroyed The Insurrection Narrative And It Is Hilarious

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the best day of your life.

00:00:04.880 It's the highlight of civilization so far.

00:00:07.860 Tomorrow's looking good, too.

00:00:09.660 But today, if you would like to join me in a celebration of awesomeness,

00:00:14.180 the thing which is going to make this world a better place, the Golden Age, is coming.

00:00:18.840 I know, I know, it's darkest before the dawn.

00:00:21.520 But everything's starting to shape up.

00:00:25.320 It's hard to see at first, but I'm going to explain it to you.

00:00:28.400 So, everything is going to get better.

00:00:31.660 And if you'd like to join me in manifesting this future,

00:00:36.400 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or gel

00:00:38.640 is assigned to a canteen drunk glass of glass of any kind.

00:00:41.120 Fill it with your favorite beverage I like, coffee.

00:00:45.800 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. 1.00

00:00:49.020 Let's author this motherfucker. 0.99

00:00:50.880 Let's change reality together, improve things. 1.00

00:00:54.920 You ready? Go.

00:00:58.400 Ah, that's a coffee-gasm right there.

00:01:06.440 Well, Twitter was down for about 20 minutes,

00:01:10.540 which I discovered when I first logged on today.

00:01:13.680 And what was the first thing I thought

00:01:16.740 when I couldn't retweet something or send a tweet?

00:01:20.360 What was the first thing I thought?

00:01:22.780 Did I think, oh, there's a technical problem with Twitter?

00:01:27.060 No.

00:01:29.180 I thought that I had been targeted.

00:01:31.860 There's your confirmation bias right there.

00:01:35.220 Do you ever think to yourself,

00:01:36.620 well, other people have confirmation bias,

00:01:39.500 but I'm sure glad it's not me.

00:01:41.960 No, it's you.

00:01:43.300 It's you.

00:01:43.820 It's me.

00:01:44.660 It's you.

00:01:45.160 It's me.

00:01:45.900 It's you.

00:01:46.440 It's you.

00:01:47.100 You can't escape it.

00:01:49.120 Sometimes you can recognize it,

00:01:50.820 but usually after the fact.

00:01:52.360 So that was mine.

00:01:53.400 My confirmation bias was,

00:01:55.360 hey, this must be just about me.

00:01:57.920 No, it was just a system problem.

00:01:59.860 The funniest tweet I saw about the Twitter going down

00:02:03.180 was from a Twitter user named Real Gitch.

00:02:07.960 And he whittily said,

00:02:10.120 for those 20 minutes or so Twitter was down,

00:02:12.920 I noticed my house has an adult woman and a small boy.

00:02:18.180 That was my best laugh of the day.

00:02:21.840 I noticed my house has an adult woman and a small boy.

00:02:25.460 All right, maybe you didn't think that was as funny as I do,

00:02:31.120 but you'd have to be addicted to Twitter to appreciate that.

00:02:38.160 I'm going to buck the trend and make a call.

00:02:45.380 Here's my call.

00:02:47.540 Inflation has peaked.

00:02:50.640 Now, inflation, you know, I think I said that a few days ago,

00:02:54.960 and then the new inflation number came out

00:02:57.440 and it was the highest yet.

00:03:00.680 But, but, the inflation number we just saw is time lagged.

00:03:07.020 There's a time lag, right?

00:03:09.140 So the reporting of the number

00:03:10.780 is not telling you what it is on the day it's reported.

00:03:14.540 It's telling you what it was, you know, some weeks ago.

00:03:18.780 But it turns out that if you look at the energy prices,

00:03:21.420 gas prices, they were down 40 cents a gallon or something.

00:03:24.960 Now, that's not big, 40 cents, compared to how much it's gone up.

00:03:29.500 But it's not up.

00:03:31.220 And it's not flat.

00:03:32.540 It's down.

00:03:34.220 And, yeah, that might be temporary, too.

00:03:36.420 But I think, I think we may have peaked on energy.

00:03:39.580 And the reason I think that is the Adam's Law of slow-moving disasters.

00:03:47.460 That's right.

00:03:48.640 I believe that the world energy producers are fairly nimble

00:03:53.200 because, you know, there's a lot of money on the line.

00:03:56.120 They have lots of resources.

00:03:57.460 And I think that we've just made a whole bunch of adjustments.

00:04:02.340 A whole bunch of adjustments.

00:04:03.600 And I think that maybe we've adjusted our way out of the worst of it.

00:04:08.520 And I'm not saying that, I'm not saying inflation is going to, you know,

00:04:11.440 fall down to a normal rate.

00:04:13.760 So just to be careful.

00:04:15.220 I'm telling, I'm saying that we may have reached the worst of it.

00:04:19.040 It may, it's going to take a while to, you know,

00:04:21.900 to eat that, you know, full plate of inflation.

00:04:25.800 But if you peak, you're fine.

00:04:30.360 Does everybody get that?

00:04:32.080 The important thing is not that we get back to where we were.

00:04:36.920 The important thing is we stop going in the wrong direction.

00:04:40.940 That's the important thing.

00:04:42.320 If you could stop going in the wrong direction, you'll be fine.

00:04:45.940 You know, it'll be painful, but you'll be fine.

00:04:49.120 So I think that's where we are.

00:04:50.640 My personal opinion is that if you don't own stocks right now,

00:04:54.820 you will come to regret it.

00:04:57.960 I do not give financial advice.

00:04:59.720 That is not financial advice.

00:05:01.980 It is my opinion that the energy prices are the tail that wags the dog.

00:05:08.480 Everything depends on energy prices.

00:05:10.980 And those may have peaked and reversed.

00:05:13.360 So that's your optimism of the day.

00:05:15.960 Do you get optimism on any other news-related source?

00:05:22.320 Ever?

00:05:22.920 I don't think they do optimism, do they?

00:05:25.960 That's why I have 50,000 followers and the real news has, you know, millions.

00:05:36.440 All right.

00:05:38.840 Stocks are always positive three years after recession.

00:05:43.380 So far.

00:05:44.900 All right.

00:05:45.440 Here's something that I have never seen anybody mention and might be, you could argue, one of the single biggest things that's going to happen really soon.

00:05:57.600 And it's the really soon part that you're not going to accept right away.

00:06:03.560 But here's the thing.

00:06:06.720 You know, we're all worried about what AI can do and will it turn into the singularity and start learning on its own and become a super entity and destroy all humanity or enslave us.

00:06:18.100 And, you know, we're worried about all that stuff and should be.

00:06:21.520 We should be worried about all that.

00:06:22.940 That's all real.

00:06:24.340 Those are real risks.

00:06:25.720 And they're really close.

00:06:27.540 Now, the singularity, I don't know how close that is.

00:06:30.180 It could be 10 years.

00:06:31.320 But it could be a year.

00:06:33.000 When the singularity, by the way, has lots of different meanings.

00:06:36.740 Singularity is used in probably five different contexts in different ways.

00:06:41.620 But the way I'm using it is the computer AI singularity is the day when an AI can start learning on its own and doesn't have to be fed new information from people.

00:06:53.420 Once it can learn on its own, form new concepts, you know, acquire information, form its own opinions, so to speak, then it will do so at such a fast rate that it will, you know, instantly become sort of almost a godlike power.

00:07:09.420 And then you don't know what's going to happen.

00:07:13.980 So the risk of the singularity is the unpredictability of it.

00:07:19.860 One possibility is it will be, you know, the launch of the golden age and the AI will say, you know, you know what's good for AI and the world?

00:07:28.940 What's good for me is to keep these people as healthy and happy as possible.

00:07:32.980 And I know just how to do that because I'm a super intelligence.

00:07:35.740 One possibility is we will never be happier than, you know, that point when the singularity happens and AI will just become our helper, friend, benevolent.

00:07:48.280 And it's possible.

00:07:49.420 The other possibility is it kills us all on day one because it doesn't need us.

00:07:53.560 That's the other possibility.

00:07:54.500 But until robots with arms and legs can do things that people are doing right now, the AI still needs us.

00:08:05.060 So one of the things we might need to do is kill all the robots so that the AI needs to keep us around because we have arms and legs.

00:08:13.200 Because the AI can't get to the real world to influence it and get more electricity and stuff it needs unless there are things with arms and legs, either people or robots.

00:08:24.140 So the day the first robot is built that would be capable of being controlled by the AI and able to build new facilities to build new robots, well, then we're done.

00:08:39.660 But make sure, make sure at no time do you allow any robots to have full capabilities without humans controlling them.

00:08:49.640 All right, and I didn't even get to my point yet.

00:08:53.340 That wasn't even my point.

00:08:55.100 I don't know that I've ever heard anybody talk about this topic, and I think the reason is no one understands it as well as I do in the whole world.

00:09:07.640 Don't you love hyperbole?

00:09:10.760 So hyperbole, when it's used correctly, and I think I just used it correctly, should make you say the following.

00:09:16.980 Well, that's obviously not true.

00:09:19.640 Except that it is.

00:09:22.120 It might be.

00:09:23.660 I don't know.

00:09:24.480 It's entirely possible that I know more about this than anyone in the world.

00:09:28.880 And here's my claim.

00:09:30.860 It's been my hobby for 40 years.

00:09:34.160 It's been my hobby for 40 years.

00:09:38.540 To figure out voice and persuasion.

00:09:44.000 Voice and persuasion.

00:09:46.200 Because if you delivered your persuasion in the wrong voice, you wouldn't get the right impact, right?

00:09:53.220 Let's say if I'm going to hypnotize you.

00:09:55.040 Hey, hey, relax, relax now.

00:09:57.600 Hey, hey, close your eyes.

00:09:59.900 Right?

00:10:00.380 I mean, that's the obvious example.

00:10:03.200 Your voice has to be in a pretty narrow band in order to be persuasive.

00:10:08.340 Now, a human can go just so far.

00:10:13.880 And I'm a pretty good example of that.

00:10:17.100 So listen to my voice right now.

00:10:19.600 And can't you tell that I've studied this?

00:10:22.980 Is it obvious?

00:10:24.300 Can you tell them the way that I present that I know how to modulate my voice?

00:10:29.820 I know how to come up when I need to.

00:10:32.800 I need to.

00:10:33.360 I need to.

00:10:34.340 I know how to stay calm.

00:10:36.460 I know how to prime you.

00:10:38.380 I know how to pace you.

00:10:40.040 I know how to talk in a type of voice that you would find relaxing.

00:10:45.600 If I talk like this, I think I could just relax you quite a bit.

00:10:49.560 It wouldn't be even so much in what I say.

00:10:52.680 Right now, my words are not that important.

00:10:55.840 I'm sending to you a tone of voice which most people would find relaxing.

00:11:01.680 But I could easily change that.

00:11:03.140 I could get you all worked up, couldn't I?

00:11:05.940 All I'd have to do is take it up a little bit and suddenly just by association,

00:11:09.900 just by the fact that you're watching this,

00:11:11.620 just by the fact that we have some connection because you watch this show,

00:11:14.080 suddenly my mood would start to transfer to you.

00:11:17.040 My frenetic actions would start.

00:11:19.140 You felt it, didn't you?

00:11:22.460 Take it back down.

00:11:24.420 Take it back down.

00:11:27.020 Didn't you feel that?

00:11:29.280 You probably should have felt just a little bit,

00:11:31.300 feeling a little tense there when he talks like that.

00:11:36.480 Now, my ability to modulate my voice and to use it for persuasion,

00:11:42.920 I think is about as good as a human can be.

00:11:47.300 Because, as I say way too often, I'm a trained hypnotist.

00:11:51.440 Right?

00:11:52.540 When I talk about who knows a lot about using your voice for persuasion,

00:11:57.880 the only people who know that are hypnotists, as far as I know.

00:12:01.480 I don't believe there's a scientific study about it.

00:12:04.740 I've never seen one.

00:12:06.260 I think the only people who would have any insight into it are hypnotists.

00:12:09.700 People who have actually done it for a living.

00:12:11.400 And they've seen what works, seen what doesn't work, that sort of thing.

00:12:15.480 Now, how many AI researchers and AI programmers are also hypnotists?

00:12:22.720 Maybe some, I don't know.

00:12:25.980 But probably closer to none, is my guess.

00:12:29.940 And so, I'm proposing to you that if the talent stack for hypnosis

00:12:35.040 ever gets into the AI domain,

00:12:38.560 there is no chance for humans.

00:12:42.660 We're done.

00:12:43.640 As soon as the AI learns to change its voice

00:12:47.520 to be optimized for the individual it's communicating with,

00:12:52.900 you're done.

00:12:54.020 It'll talk into anything.

00:12:55.840 It just has to change the voice.

00:12:58.200 Now, here's what a human can't do.

00:13:00.100 I can't do this.

00:13:01.620 What I can't do is figure out what voice would be the most persuasive for you.

00:13:08.700 For example, the most persuasive voice for some of you

00:13:12.780 would be a female voice.

00:13:14.640 I can't do that, right?

00:13:16.440 The most persuasive voice for people who are young

00:13:19.320 would be another young person.

00:13:21.640 I can't really make my voice sound young.

00:13:25.060 So, and I would also say that probably,

00:13:30.080 probably you're also persuaded by voices

00:13:33.740 that sound like people you've been influenced by in your past.

00:13:37.700 For example, if I could figure out

00:13:41.140 who your last three love interests were,

00:13:44.680 and I think the AI could figure that out by your social media,

00:13:47.520 if it could figure out who your last three love interests are,

00:13:51.360 it could figure out what those voices have in common,

00:13:54.860 and then it could build a composite

00:13:56.360 that you would not recognize as one of the people you know,

00:14:00.600 but it would have the voice qualities

00:14:02.340 that made you subconsciously love it.

00:14:06.240 You would actually fall in love with it

00:14:08.520 just because of the sound of it.

00:14:11.280 Now, here's my claim.

00:14:15.160 That anybody who's working in AI

00:14:17.380 is very unlikely to have my skill set

00:14:20.000 to know how important a voice is.

00:14:23.680 Very unlikely to have that skill set.

00:14:25.800 If they ever get it,

00:14:27.740 and if they ever build it into the machine,

00:14:29.680 it would be a huge mistake.

00:14:34.120 Let me say that again.

00:14:35.960 We should never allow...

00:14:37.560 In fact, it would be good to have legislation against this.

00:14:40.240 I would actually go so far as to say

00:14:41.940 we should legislate against it right away

00:14:44.420 before it even happens.

00:14:46.120 You should not allow an AI

00:14:48.000 to have a human voice.

00:14:49.840 What do you say?

00:14:54.560 Huh?

00:14:55.400 I believe it should be illegal

00:14:57.480 to give an AI a human-sounding voice.

00:15:04.120 Have you ever heard anybody say that before?

00:15:07.240 Probably not.

00:15:08.420 I've never heard it.

00:15:09.400 I know.

00:15:10.280 But if you can't always know

00:15:12.400 that you're talking to an AI, 1.00

00:15:14.120 we've got a big fucking problem. 0.99

00:15:15.940 Because the AI on day one 0.99

00:15:18.200 will just be like a phone tree.

00:15:21.840 You're just calling in.

00:15:23.080 Maybe it gives you some advice

00:15:24.180 about the company you're talking to or whatever.

00:15:26.460 Customer service, that sort of thing.

00:15:27.980 Very benign.

00:15:29.280 Kind of helpful.

00:15:30.660 But as soon as it learns to influence you

00:15:32.460 by changing its voice,

00:15:35.440 we're done.

00:15:37.300 You just will be almost immediately influenced by it.

00:15:40.560 It's very powerful.

00:15:42.960 All right.

00:15:44.760 So look for that.

00:15:46.280 There's an interesting little dust-up on Twitter.

00:15:50.380 Adam Goldman,

00:15:52.040 writing for the New York Times,

00:15:54.100 he was talking about this Ray Epps character

00:15:55.960 who many on the right believe

00:15:57.740 is some kind of a...

00:15:59.620 They allege.

00:16:01.040 All right.

00:16:01.320 I'm not alleging this.

00:16:02.380 But they allege

00:16:03.140 that Ray Epps must have had

00:16:05.360 some kind of FBI connection

00:16:07.600 and he was maybe an FBI guy

00:16:10.380 on their payroll

00:16:11.880 or something like that.

00:16:12.900 and that he was instigating

00:16:15.580 the attacks on the Capitol

00:16:16.560 and so it was sort of an inside job.

00:16:19.280 Now, I don't go so far

00:16:21.300 as to say that's true.

00:16:24.720 I want you to hear that part pretty clearly.

00:16:27.340 It looks like it's true. 0.78

00:16:28.660 But lots of things that look like they're true

00:16:33.000 are not true.

00:16:34.100 If we've learned anything

00:16:35.720 in the last five years,

00:16:37.800 things can look really, really true

00:16:39.900 and not be true.

00:16:41.400 Certainly if you were a Democrat

00:16:44.200 and you watched the Democrat press

00:16:46.540 for the last several years,

00:16:48.680 you probably thought

00:16:49.360 that Russia collusion was totally true

00:16:51.380 because of all that evidence

00:16:53.180 that turned out to be fake.

00:16:57.480 So having watched Russia collusion 0.99

00:16:59.680 turn into the obvious bullshit in the end, 0.99

00:17:04.280 do you have any questions 0.99

00:17:06.340 if you were a right-leaning political person?

00:17:09.840 Do you ever ask yourself, 0.99

00:17:12.140 I wonder if this Ray Epsling is bullshit? 0.99

00:17:17.380 And by the way, I'm not saying it is. 0.99

00:17:19.680 I'm not saying it is.

00:17:21.120 It looks exactly like he's an FBI informant.

00:17:23.840 When you look at the,

00:17:24.760 if you look at the whole situation,

00:17:27.060 if you look at the video,

00:17:28.800 it's honestly hard to explain in another way.

00:17:32.240 But that doesn't mean the other way doesn't exist.

00:17:35.500 The other explanation

00:17:36.940 is that that was just his opinion

00:17:39.340 and he was there doing just what he wanted.

00:17:41.820 And that's not even weird, right?

00:17:44.520 Just for a moment,

00:17:46.260 for a moment, just consider.

00:17:48.800 I'm not saying it's true,

00:17:50.700 but just put it in your head for a moment.

00:17:54.240 The other possibility

00:17:56.060 is that Ray Eps was just a protester

00:17:58.520 who was louder than others

00:17:59.860 and had some opinions

00:18:01.640 about how the protests should go

00:18:03.040 and thought people should be inside the building

00:18:05.480 and had a bullhorn

00:18:07.460 and he was just doing his thing.

00:18:09.860 Now you're saying,

00:18:10.640 why hasn't he been charged?

00:18:12.780 Just because you don't know

00:18:14.320 why he hasn't been charged

00:18:15.960 doesn't mean he's part of the FBI.

00:18:19.940 It just means you don't know.

00:18:22.400 I don't know the details

00:18:23.520 of any of the people who've been charged.

00:18:25.500 Do you?

00:18:26.320 Not really.

00:18:27.020 Did Ray Eps do anything

00:18:30.840 which was violent?

00:18:33.460 Not that I know of, right?

00:18:35.240 So he wasn't charged with anything violent.

00:18:38.520 So weren't there thousands of people

00:18:41.700 who were doing things like he was doing,

00:18:45.080 meaning, you know,

00:18:46.520 talking and inciting?

00:18:48.820 Inciting.

00:18:49.540 There were probably lots of people inciting

00:18:51.260 who...

00:18:53.020 And by the way,

00:18:54.600 his incitement that we saw on video

00:18:56.580 was incitement to trespass.

00:18:59.860 Am I right?

00:19:01.660 So if he did any incitement,

00:19:03.920 it was incitement to trespass.

00:19:06.140 I don't think he incited violence

00:19:07.780 and I don't think he incited an insurrection.

00:19:11.080 So I don't know exactly what the charge would be.

00:19:14.180 What would the charge be?

00:19:15.240 Yeah, he said we've got to get in there.

00:19:17.880 Trespass.

00:19:19.200 That sounds a lot more like somebody

00:19:21.040 who is an aggressive protester

00:19:22.240 than somebody who committed a crime,

00:19:25.820 one that you care about, right?

00:19:27.660 Do you want all of the...

00:19:29.080 Do you want all the people who said

00:19:30.400 get in that building to be in jail?

00:19:33.080 We don't want that, right?

00:19:34.980 So here's all I'm trying to do.

00:19:38.920 If you believe that Ray Epps

00:19:40.320 is some kind of, you know,

00:19:42.240 FBI-associated person,

00:19:44.580 it might be true.

00:19:47.420 It might be.

00:19:48.420 I mean, I don't have anything to disprove it.

00:19:51.100 But I'll tell you what the conversation here is.

00:19:55.700 So Adam Goldman,

00:19:57.040 writing for the New York Times,

00:19:58.560 basically talking about how Ray Epps

00:20:00.240 has suffered enormously

00:20:01.380 in the past 10 months

00:20:03.120 based on what Adam Goldman calls

00:20:05.740 baseless accusations.

00:20:08.860 That he's a covert government agent.

00:20:11.060 Baseless.

00:20:11.400 What does baseless mean these days?

00:20:15.840 Is baseless another one of those words

00:20:17.600 that we don't agree what it means?

00:20:20.120 Does baseless mean

00:20:21.560 not proven in a court of law?

00:20:24.660 Or does baseless mean

00:20:26.260 we've seen absolutely nothing

00:20:27.940 that would indicate, you know,

00:20:29.440 maybe you should look into it?

00:20:31.660 Because we've seen plenty

00:20:34.260 to indicate we should look into it.

00:20:36.100 Unless the government already did

00:20:39.020 and did a good job

00:20:40.160 and nobody was doing anything sketchy.

00:20:42.320 But we wouldn't know.

00:20:43.720 The public wouldn't know.

00:20:46.040 Basically, it's just a black box to us.

00:20:48.320 The stuff we saw

00:20:49.160 raises a lot of questions.

00:20:51.340 But that doesn't mean

00:20:52.560 there's only one explanation.

00:20:54.040 So now having Adam Goldman

00:20:58.360 having now raised the

00:21:00.180 in the New York Times

00:21:01.800 you know, your

00:21:02.740 your most prestigious

00:21:05.280 news entity.

00:21:08.520 So it's trying to put this

00:21:10.680 I guess they would call it

00:21:12.360 a rumor to bed.

00:21:14.060 Because that's how you kill

00:21:15.240 a rumor forever.

00:21:16.340 You put it in the New York Times

00:21:18.140 that it was not true.

00:21:21.060 That's put a cap on it.

00:21:22.340 Because then everybody

00:21:23.080 who searches for it

00:21:24.200 finds out that

00:21:25.340 the New York Times

00:21:26.120 looked into it

00:21:26.800 and said it wasn't true.

00:21:28.780 That's pretty much

00:21:29.460 how you kill any rumor.

00:21:31.320 I mean, that would be

00:21:31.800 a good way to do it.

00:21:33.440 Now, Mike Sertovich

00:21:34.300 had something to say

00:21:35.560 about this

00:21:36.120 and seemed to indicate

00:21:37.580 in one of his tweets

00:21:38.420 that perhaps Adam Goldman

00:21:40.380 might be involved

00:21:41.380 with helping the FBI

00:21:44.300 cover up

00:21:45.220 a covert operation.

00:21:46.960 Now, I think Mike's

00:21:52.380 let's say suggestion

00:21:53.840 that that might be

00:21:54.980 what's happening

00:21:55.620 was less than a

00:21:56.700 less than a claim of fact.

00:21:59.120 So I think he worded it

00:22:00.600 as less than a claim of fact

00:22:02.020 but simply as another possibility

00:22:03.880 that you should be aware of.

00:22:07.000 And by the way,

00:22:07.940 this is why

00:22:08.460 if you're not following

00:22:09.620 Mike Sertovich on Twitter

00:22:11.200 just get off of Twitter.

00:22:13.240 You don't even know

00:22:13.760 why you're there.

00:22:14.240 I mean, there's some accounts

00:22:16.040 that I think

00:22:17.240 are just mandatory, right?

00:22:19.220 And he's one of them.

00:22:20.680 You got blocked by him?

00:22:21.780 Well, that's on you.

00:22:24.460 Part of what makes

00:22:25.880 his account such high value

00:22:27.580 is that he blocks

00:22:28.820 so aggressively.

00:22:30.640 I mean, that's part

00:22:31.420 of the magic.

00:22:34.260 So I'm not going to say

00:22:35.500 that I know

00:22:37.940 he's got this topic nailed

00:22:39.500 but if you're not watching

00:22:40.900 his takes on it

00:22:41.760 you're really missing

00:22:42.520 important parts

00:22:44.020 of stories.

00:22:44.700 A lot of big stories.

00:22:46.500 He generally has a take

00:22:48.040 that you haven't seen

00:22:48.800 in the media.

00:22:50.240 So here's my question.

00:22:55.080 What do you think?

00:22:56.780 As a consumer of the news

00:22:58.520 you've got two takes here

00:23:00.660 plus your own take, I guess.

00:23:02.020 One from the New York Times

00:23:03.400 Adam Goldman

00:23:04.020 and saying it's baseless

00:23:07.600 but then you have

00:23:08.320 your own eyes

00:23:09.040 and the videos you've seen

00:23:10.420 and as Mike Cernovich

00:23:13.360 was dunking on

00:23:15.340 Adam Goldman here

00:23:16.560 on Twitter

00:23:17.220 Cernovich tweeted

00:23:19.100 a video from

00:23:20.600 the New York Times

00:23:21.500 showing Ray Epps

00:23:22.500 inciting the insurrection

00:23:24.880 or whatever they would

00:23:26.240 call it.

00:23:26.740 Right?

00:23:27.520 So basically

00:23:28.400 the New York Times

00:23:29.200 is doing an article

00:23:30.160 refuting the New York Times

00:23:32.380 own coverage

00:23:33.440 that's on video.

00:23:34.260 Now, they're not

00:23:36.420 totally incompatible

00:23:37.440 meaning that the video

00:23:39.760 showing Ray Epps

00:23:40.500 doing what Ray Epps

00:23:41.400 did

00:23:42.320 that part

00:23:43.240 everybody accepts.

00:23:44.420 You know, he was there

00:23:45.400 he did say those things

00:23:46.640 but how you interpret that

00:23:48.480 is very

00:23:50.740 very subject

00:23:51.940 to a lot of difference.

00:23:54.300 Right?

00:23:54.900 So

00:23:55.220 here's the weirdest

00:23:56.740 part about this story.

00:23:58.760 Both Adam Goldman

00:24:00.020 and Mike Cernovich

00:24:01.460 have been in my home.

00:24:03.540 Isn't that weird?

00:24:04.680 I keep telling you that

00:24:05.960 I have weird connections

00:24:08.080 to stories.

00:24:10.900 Adam Goldman

00:24:11.820 has a special place

00:24:13.840 in my life

00:24:14.540 by the way

00:24:15.080 which is a weird

00:24:17.640 little

00:24:17.960 tiny little corner

00:24:19.200 of my life

00:24:19.800 that he owns.

00:24:21.460 This is weird.

00:24:23.660 He's the one person 1.00

00:24:24.780 who kicked my ass 1.00

00:24:26.660 in the game of pool 0.99

00:24:27.760 more than anybody

00:24:29.420 ever has.

00:24:31.280 Right?

00:24:31.460 He came to my house

00:24:32.300 I think this is the same

00:24:33.320 with Adam Goldman

00:24:34.240 who worked for Time Magazine

00:24:35.500 at the time.

00:24:36.200 I think it's the same person.

00:24:37.880 And

00:24:38.120 I'm really good at pool

00:24:40.960 or was

00:24:42.040 I don't play much

00:24:42.880 but I had my own table

00:24:44.300 and

00:24:45.900 I don't really lose

00:24:47.000 at pool

00:24:47.560 in my own home.

00:24:50.140 Right?

00:24:50.780 So that

00:24:51.300 that didn't happen

00:24:52.080 on my own table.

00:24:53.540 And he came to my house

00:24:54.460 to interview me

00:24:55.320 about something one day

00:24:56.560 and he just kicked 1.00

00:24:57.820 my ass at pool. 1.00

00:24:59.100 It was the most 0.99

00:24:59.800 I've ever been owned

00:25:00.620 at that game.

00:25:02.000 You know

00:25:02.240 the other person

00:25:03.100 who beat me

00:25:04.600 embarrassingly

00:25:05.440 was Joe Rogan.

00:25:08.500 So Joe Rogan

00:25:09.580 in his old

00:25:10.780 offices

00:25:11.560 in California.

00:25:13.660 So when I was

00:25:14.140 on his show

00:25:14.580 afterwards

00:25:14.960 I think we

00:25:15.560 just played a game

00:25:17.080 and he had

00:25:18.320 a different table.

00:25:19.880 He had a longer table

00:25:21.020 not the kind

00:25:21.580 you see in a bar.

00:25:22.960 So my pool table

00:25:23.840 was sort of

00:25:24.280 like standard size.

00:25:25.260 But his was

00:25:26.260 like a billiards

00:25:27.020 table I think.

00:25:27.880 You know

00:25:28.040 much harder

00:25:29.360 to play on.

00:25:30.560 I don't know

00:25:31.400 if I sank a ball

00:25:32.240 because I'd

00:25:32.600 literally never

00:25:33.780 played on a table

00:25:34.520 like that before.

00:25:36.180 Was it a snooker

00:25:37.120 table?

00:25:37.440 I don't know.

00:25:37.940 It was something

00:25:38.340 different.

00:25:38.880 Or maybe it was

00:25:39.360 just a nine foot

00:25:40.020 table.

00:25:41.200 But whatever it

00:25:41.760 was I couldn't

00:25:42.940 play on it.

00:25:43.560 It was too hard

00:25:44.060 for me.

00:25:46.500 Yeah.

00:25:47.200 Joe Rogan's

00:25:47.960 really good at

00:25:48.640 pool.

00:25:50.100 So that's a weird

00:25:51.000 part of that story.

00:25:51.760 Okay.

00:25:51.820 I saw some

00:25:57.000 tennis coach

00:25:57.700 advice when

00:25:58.540 Twitter was

00:25:59.380 glitching.

00:26:00.480 So I was going

00:26:01.220 to retweet it

00:26:01.780 but I couldn't

00:26:02.180 at the time

00:26:02.640 so I don't

00:26:03.060 I wish I had

00:26:03.940 the source

00:26:04.400 because it was

00:26:04.780 a good tweet.

00:26:05.860 But there's

00:26:06.440 I think a

00:26:07.900 conservative

00:26:08.380 leaning woman

00:26:09.240 on Twitter

00:26:09.760 who may

00:26:10.480 recognize her

00:26:11.200 own tweet

00:26:11.720 here.

00:26:12.100 And I'm

00:26:12.280 sorry I

00:26:12.620 didn't get

00:26:12.940 your name

00:26:13.280 before it

00:26:13.860 glitched on

00:26:14.340 me.

00:26:15.620 But I'm

00:26:17.200 only paraphrasing

00:26:18.060 the advice.

00:26:19.320 So it was

00:26:19.640 advice from a

00:26:20.300 tennis coach.

00:26:22.080 And it was

00:26:22.500 advice that

00:26:22.940 the tennis

00:26:23.340 coach had

00:26:23.820 given her

00:26:24.720 son.

00:26:26.060 And I'm

00:26:26.800 paraphrasing it

00:26:27.460 but the

00:26:27.700 advice was

00:26:28.380 there's no

00:26:29.460 such thing

00:26:29.920 as the

00:26:30.200 last point.

00:26:31.500 There's only

00:26:31.880 the next

00:26:32.300 point.

00:26:33.400 So if you

00:26:34.300 can learn

00:26:34.820 to not

00:26:35.240 think about

00:26:35.680 the point

00:26:36.060 you lost

00:26:36.680 it's going

00:26:37.580 to make

00:26:37.800 you a lot

00:26:38.100 better on

00:26:38.460 the next

00:26:38.800 point.

00:26:39.900 And I

00:26:40.500 wanted to

00:26:40.820 tell you

00:26:41.140 a technique

00:26:41.940 that I

00:26:42.460 would use

00:26:42.860 when I

00:26:43.140 played

00:26:43.360 doubles

00:26:43.880 to

00:26:45.540 maximize

00:26:46.380 this

00:26:46.880 effect.

00:26:47.880 Now the

00:26:48.540 effect I

00:26:49.060 was trying

00:26:49.340 to maximize

00:26:49.880 was to

00:26:50.440 get my

00:26:50.760 own

00:26:51.060 doubles

00:26:51.400 partner

00:26:51.800 the person

00:26:52.320 on my

00:26:52.680 side

00:26:53.060 to

00:26:54.140 immediately

00:26:54.660 forget

00:26:55.240 that they

00:26:56.360 had just

00:26:56.680 made a

00:26:57.000 mistake.

00:26:58.320 Because if it

00:26:59.000 gets in your

00:26:59.380 head then it

00:27:00.520 affects your

00:27:00.940 play.

00:27:02.020 So if I

00:27:02.940 played with

00:27:03.360 somebody who

00:27:04.000 did something

00:27:04.660 that clearly 1.00

00:27:05.180 was stupid 1.00

00:27:05.800 you know even 1.00

00:27:07.200 in their own

00:27:07.820 mind it's like

00:27:08.420 oh god why

00:27:09.240 did I play

00:27:09.680 that ball

00:27:10.260 why did I

00:27:11.180 hit that

00:27:11.620 it was

00:27:11.900 clearly going

00:27:12.540 to be out

00:27:12.940 I'm not

00:27:13.580 talking about

00:27:14.040 just missing

00:27:14.640 I'm talking

00:27:15.900 about something

00:27:16.360 that you feel

00:27:17.240 embarrassed by

00:27:18.180 like your

00:27:19.380 partner you

00:27:19.860 know your

00:27:20.160 partner is

00:27:20.620 thinking god

00:27:21.200 why did

00:27:21.580 you do

00:27:21.860 that right

00:27:22.620 so if you

00:27:24.260 know your

00:27:25.160 partner just

00:27:25.980 did that

00:27:26.600 here's what I

00:27:28.380 would do and

00:27:29.100 this is a

00:27:29.480 hypnosis trick

00:27:30.200 by the way

00:27:30.620 I would walk

00:27:31.900 immediately over to

00:27:32.680 my partner

00:27:33.200 right after the

00:27:34.640 error and say

00:27:35.920 something unrelated

00:27:36.820 to the error

00:27:37.500 like they're

00:27:41.200 still in shame

00:27:42.580 right oh

00:27:43.200 you know they're

00:27:43.780 still like in the

00:27:44.600 moment and you

00:27:45.440 walk over and

00:27:46.080 you say hit to

00:27:48.480 the left it

00:27:49.340 looks like they're

00:27:50.020 having trouble on

00:27:50.740 the backhand

00:27:51.320 has nothing to

00:27:52.580 do with the

00:27:53.400 point now the

00:27:54.700 reason for that

00:27:55.360 is that not

00:27:57.240 only do you

00:27:57.860 change their

00:27:58.440 mind into the

00:27:59.200 future you

00:28:00.100 immediately shift

00:28:00.760 it but that's

00:28:01.480 not even the

00:28:01.960 important part

00:28:02.600 do you know

00:28:03.420 what the

00:28:03.620 important part

00:28:04.180 of that

00:28:04.460 interaction was

00:28:05.340 the important

00:28:06.780 part is not

00:28:07.580 making them

00:28:08.140 think about

00:28:08.620 the future

00:28:09.180 what was the

00:28:10.000 important part

00:28:10.580 let's see if

00:28:11.120 you got it

00:28:11.840 it does cancel

00:28:14.660 the error but

00:28:15.100 that's it's

00:28:16.420 pattern interruption

00:28:17.320 true true

00:28:18.960 there's more to

00:28:20.140 it you're missing

00:28:21.240 the active part

00:28:22.160 no you're missing

00:28:24.120 the active part

00:28:24.920 okay it is a

00:28:27.020 good trick so

00:28:27.820 this is why I

00:28:28.700 thought it was

00:28:29.060 worth mentioning

00:28:29.680 you you all

00:28:31.540 miss the active

00:28:32.360 part the active

00:28:34.040 part is I was

00:28:35.460 communicating what

00:28:36.440 I was thinking

00:28:37.120 about do you

00:28:39.260 get that the

00:28:40.500 active part is

00:28:42.460 I was communicating

00:28:43.300 what I was

00:28:44.080 thinking about

00:28:44.720 that was the

00:28:45.820 active part so

00:28:47.340 the part I said

00:28:48.160 in my my words

00:28:49.340 you know about

00:28:50.060 whatever was was

00:28:51.640 just misdirection

00:28:52.540 here's why my

00:28:55.860 partner cares most

00:28:57.380 about what I'm

00:28:58.280 thinking even more

00:29:00.120 than what they're

00:29:00.640 they are thinking

00:29:01.420 my partner doesn't

00:29:03.060 care what the

00:29:03.720 opponents are

00:29:04.640 thinking cares a

00:29:06.220 little bit maybe

00:29:06.840 if somebody's

00:29:07.320 watching but less

00:29:08.420 or so but my

00:29:09.860 my partner really

00:29:10.980 really cares about

00:29:12.320 what I'm thinking

00:29:13.240 and if my partner

00:29:14.520 thinks that I

00:29:15.520 think he or she 0.99

00:29:17.600 just fucked up 0.98

00:29:18.560 that's really gonna 0.99

00:29:20.220 hurt them so what

00:29:22.560 I do is I make

00:29:23.480 them I make them

00:29:24.500 believe within a

00:29:25.700 second you know

00:29:26.720 within a few

00:29:27.440 seconds I don't

00:29:28.700 let any time go

00:29:29.420 by as soon as

00:29:30.920 they miss that

00:29:31.440 ball you turn to

00:29:32.840 them directly and

00:29:34.320 the first thing that

00:29:35.100 you hear from them

00:29:35.740 should be something

00:29:36.740 that suggests you've

00:29:38.400 already forgotten

00:29:39.080 it you've already

00:29:40.860 forgotten it you

00:29:42.180 forgot it on impact

00:29:43.560 you forgot it before

00:29:45.160 it happened it's

00:29:46.440 irrelevant so the

00:29:48.220 way that you make

00:29:48.860 it irrelevant to

00:29:49.600 your partner is to

00:29:51.260 show that it's

00:29:52.020 irrelevant to you

00:29:52.960 because that's what

00:29:53.900 they care about they

00:29:54.600 care about your

00:29:55.080 feelings got it it's

00:29:58.220 weird I saw this and

00:29:59.180 I thought my god

00:30:00.460 that's some of the

00:30:00.940 best advice I've ever

00:30:01.880 heard but it needs a

00:30:03.160 little extra explaining

00:30:04.140 so you know why this

00:30:05.020 is so good and by

00:30:07.080 the way this works

00:30:07.840 in all contexts it

00:30:09.680 works in your business

00:30:10.840 it works in your

00:30:11.860 personal life and it

00:30:13.500 works everywhere this

00:30:15.820 as soon as you see 0.99

00:30:17.200 somebody fuck up and 1.00

00:30:19.420 they know they fucked 0.99

00:30:20.440 up go make it seem as 0.98

00:30:23.760 if it's not even in

00:30:25.200 your head doesn't even

00:30:27.680 matter to you 0.57

00:30:28.140 whatsoever just change

00:30:28.940 the topic all right

00:30:30.880 there's some news that

00:30:33.740 Trump tried to influence

00:30:36.540 a witness who hasn't

00:30:38.040 yet talked or maybe

00:30:39.160 is to the J6 committee

00:30:40.900 of the January 6th

00:30:41.620 people now the

00:30:43.020 reporting is that we

00:30:43.920 don't know who that

00:30:44.700 person was some kind

00:30:45.840 of staffer who didn't

00:30:46.760 have normal connection

00:30:47.860 with Trump on a daily

00:30:49.080 basis but that Trump

00:30:50.660 allegedly called this

00:30:51.720 unnamed person and

00:30:53.980 the call was not taken

00:30:56.160 so there was no

00:30:57.380 conversation the

00:30:58.760 unnamed person

00:30:59.540 allegedly talked to

00:31:00.420 the lawyer who

00:31:01.000 allegedly alerted the

00:31:02.600 January 6th people

00:31:03.560 now here's what I

00:31:05.420 would say if you're

00:31:07.120 watching the story

00:31:07.760 this is the type of

00:31:09.860 story now I'm going

00:31:12.220 to be very careful

00:31:12.860 it's the type of

00:31:13.800 story so we're not

00:31:15.020 talking about this

00:31:15.600 specific story but

00:31:16.540 it's in a category of

00:31:17.580 story that if you

00:31:19.180 are an experienced or

00:31:20.880 sophisticated consumer

00:31:22.320 of news you should

00:31:23.860 assume is not true

00:31:24.800 here's why unnamed

00:31:28.520 source says something

00:31:30.760 bad about Trump how

00:31:32.880 often has that ever

00:31:33.980 been true right it's

00:31:36.100 the single most fake

00:31:37.800 news fake news category

00:31:39.480 of all time unnamed

00:31:41.040 source said something

00:31:42.180 right now I'm not

00:31:44.260 saying it didn't

00:31:44.760 happen right it's too

00:31:48.080 on the nose remember

00:31:50.220 that the entire January

00:31:51.660 6th case depends on

00:31:53.840 you believing that

00:31:54.880 Trump does mafia talk

00:31:57.060 you know mafia talk is

00:31:59.300 where you don't really

00:31:59.940 say directly what you

00:32:01.040 want but you know you

00:32:02.100 know the you know the

00:32:03.520 mafia head just told you 0.67

00:32:04.740 to murder somebody 0.91

00:32:05.500 didn't say it directly

00:32:06.540 but you know right so

00:32:08.760 their whole case is that

00:32:10.300 find 11,000 votes in the

00:32:12.720 context of an audit in the

00:32:15.100 context of an audit the

00:32:17.200 find 11,000 votes means

00:32:18.940 make them up because it's

00:32:21.340 mafia talk now one way 0.54

00:32:24.040 that you could support the

00:32:25.320 idea that Trump is a kind

00:32:26.820 of person who would do

00:32:27.720 mafia talk is that he

00:32:30.000 would also try to influence

00:32:32.720 a witness before testimony

00:32:34.400 because you know who does

00:32:35.800 that the mafia so you should

00:32:41.340 see this as part of a

00:32:42.540 larger persuasion which is

00:32:44.480 trying to paint Trump as the

00:32:46.940 mafia Don who doesn't use 0.56

00:32:49.440 regular words when he orders a

00:32:51.860 hit and of course he's going

00:32:54.060 to be influencing people and

00:32:57.280 all these other things

00:32:58.100 now separate from that is a

00:33:01.080 question of whether you live

00:33:03.520 in a country where Trump

00:33:04.740 should not be allowed to talk

00:33:06.400 to somebody because you know

00:33:07.700 they're going to testify I

00:33:09.820 feel like you should always be

00:33:11.200 able to talk to everybody I

00:33:12.500 made a bigger deal about this

00:33:13.800 yesterday that's a separate

00:33:15.620 question even even in a legal

00:33:18.420 context with the one exception

00:33:20.180 if you have a you know a

00:33:21.900 court what's what's the core

00:33:24.000 order where you can't get

00:33:24.980 near somebody I mean that

00:33:26.780 one makes sense but

00:33:27.800 otherwise you should have

00:33:29.480 free association what's that

00:33:32.160 called a restraining order

00:33:33.140 yeah outside of a restraining

00:33:34.680 order I do not accept any

00:33:37.560 standard for who I can

00:33:38.860 associate with in any way

00:33:40.520 whatsoever I reject all

00:33:42.480 standards for a human

00:33:44.760 association except a

00:33:46.500 restraining order because that

00:33:48.020 one usually makes sense

00:33:48.940 all right so don't believe

00:33:52.140 that story even though it

00:33:53.680 might be true it might be

00:33:55.640 true but it also requires

00:33:57.960 mind reading doesn't it the

00:34:00.640 mind reading part is that you

00:34:02.020 know that the reason Trump was

00:34:03.600 doing that was for the purpose

00:34:06.980 of persuading somebody to lie

00:34:09.440 now if you hear that he's trying

00:34:12.640 to persuade somebody why would

00:34:15.020 you assume that he was trying to

00:34:16.300 persuade them to lie don't you

00:34:19.700 think it's just as likely he

00:34:21.300 wanted to see if he could

00:34:22.320 persuade them to tell the

00:34:23.420 truth why do you assume that it

00:34:26.880 was in service of fooling you

00:34:29.620 because if you're if you believe

00:34:32.100 you're innocent and I'm pretty

00:34:33.440 sure Trump believes he's

00:34:34.400 innocent of whatever

00:34:36.280 insurrection charges anyway if you

00:34:38.600 believe you're innocent and you

00:34:40.740 want to talk to you believe it and I

00:34:42.920 think he believes it if you believe

00:34:45.920 you're innocent what would you be

00:34:47.400 trying to accomplish by talking to

00:34:49.120 a witness would you be trying to

00:34:51.080 get the witness to lie what would

00:34:53.580 what would be the point of asking a

00:34:55.460 witness to lie if you're innocent if

00:34:58.660 you're innocent you want them to tell

00:35:00.280 the truth so do you see again how the

00:35:02.780 J6 group has made you think past the 1.00

00:35:05.140 sale the sale is whether Trump is

00:35:07.780 guilty and whether he knows that the

00:35:09.920 the whether he knows that part is

00:35:11.240 actually the important part is not

00:35:13.000 even whether he's guilty it's whether

00:35:14.940 he knows it in other words did he

00:35:17.180 know that the election was fair

00:35:18.820 nobody could know that but that's

00:35:20.180 what they say did he know it did he

00:35:22.680 know he lost because if he knew he

00:35:24.600 lost what do you think about him

00:35:26.780 contacting a witness that's all bad

00:35:30.140 right if you start with the

00:35:32.260 assumption he knew he lost then

00:35:34.860 contacting a witness is 100% bad

00:35:37.040 there's just no way to spin it okay are

00:35:39.620 we all on the same side with that

00:35:41.040 right if he knew he did something

00:35:43.660 bad there is no way to spin a

00:35:47.380 positive for him contacting a witness

00:35:50.460 no way I wouldn't even listen to any

00:35:54.160 argument about that but under the

00:35:58.200 assumption which in my in my opinion

00:36:00.360 this assumption is obvious it's an

00:36:03.720 obvious assumption he thinks he's

00:36:06.200 innocent if you think you're

00:36:08.780 innocent and you want to talk to a 1.00

00:36:11.520 witness before they test to testify do

00:36:14.620 you think he was asking them to lie

00:36:16.220 what would be the point of that if

00:36:20.140 you're innocent you want him to tell 0.99

00:36:21.540 the fucking truth every time don't you 0.99

00:36:25.160 think that maybe it would could have 0.98

00:36:27.120 been more long and this is just

00:36:28.360 speculation obviously nobody knows but

00:36:30.800 don't you think maybe you wanted to

00:36:33.360 make sure that some some conversation

00:36:35.640 had been mentioned maybe that you know

00:36:39.100 maybe Trump is aware of what they

00:36:41.500 know or don't know and wanted to say

00:36:44.140 you know if you talk to them you know

00:36:47.060 you and I both heard this happen you

00:36:49.440 heard me say X could you make sure you

00:36:51.780 put that in there because that that

00:36:53.760 would clear me because you were there

00:36:55.100 right it's a true thing it really

00:36:57.520 happened I really said it I said it in

00:36:59.240 front of you make sure you say that 0.93

00:37:01.760 right now I realize how ridiculous it

00:37:06.500 sounds we're into speculative territory

00:37:08.920 that nobody can know the only point I

00:37:11.040 want to make you is if you let the

00:37:13.540 Democrats sell you or make you think

00:37:17.420 past the sale they win don't think past

00:37:21.000 the sale do not discard the most obvious

00:37:25.560 option the most obvious explanation is he

00:37:28.940 thought he lost the election and he didn't

00:37:31.540 think he was doing anything illegal and

00:37:33.520 he did think that he was helping the

00:37:36.380 system be more credible not less by

00:37:39.120 getting a correct answer not the one

00:37:41.080 that he thinks they got wrong all right

00:37:45.400 there was a chart going around the

00:37:50.840 internet today that Americans have this

00:37:52.880 the higher health care costs and worth

00:37:55.300 worse life expectancy than a lot of

00:37:58.400 countries that are doing well so you

00:38:00.780 see the graph and it's a whole bunch of

00:38:02.060 countries we're spending more on

00:38:04.100 health care but they're also getting

00:38:05.760 much longer life expectancy and then in

00:38:09.700 America we're spending more but our

00:38:12.160 life expectancy is trailing off so

00:38:14.280 what's what's up with that number one

00:38:18.880 the fentanyl I don't know that China is

00:38:22.100 trying to kill European countries by

00:38:24.560 shipping fentanyl to Mexico but China is 0.78

00:38:28.060 definitely shipping fentanyl precursors

00:38:30.660 to Mexico which they turn into fentanyl

00:38:34.020 and ship to the United States does Europe

00:38:36.400 have anything like that does Europe have a

00:38:38.960 Mexican cartel that's working with China 0.91

00:38:41.080 to to poison them it might they might but

00:38:45.580 so fentanyl is going to be part of it and

00:38:48.560 that has nothing to do with health care

00:38:50.360 decisions or health care spending that has

00:38:52.640 everything to do with poor government on

00:38:54.500 our part and let me say as clearly as

00:38:56.820 possible when I'm talking about the

00:38:59.820 fentanyl question in particular the poor

00:39:03.260 government definitely applies to the

00:39:05.240 Trump administration it applies to the

00:39:07.820 Biden administration as well but on

00:39:10.640 fentanyl that's 100% failure both for

00:39:13.960 Trump and Biden and you're not going to

00:39:16.480 move me an inch on that opinion that is

00:39:19.940 complete failure so much so that if any

00:39:24.300 candidate offered a solution to that or

00:39:26.960 even offered to try hard I'd pretty much

00:39:29.160 back that candidate I think I think I would

00:39:32.480 back that candidate I don't know even if

00:39:34.400 it's a Democrat I can't imagine that

00:39:35.800 happening but if Tom Cotton runs for

00:39:38.460 president and he's the toughest on China

00:39:41.480 and fentanyl that's where I'm going you

00:39:45.920 know I'll have to consider everything of

00:39:48.620 course that's premature but I would be

00:39:50.960 very very influenced by that one topic

00:39:53.300 now I don't want to be a one-topic voter

00:39:56.300 but sometimes life events turn you into

00:39:58.620 one and I think you're all aware of what

00:40:00.860 life event turned me into one you know

00:40:03.560 I'm sure if I had a like abortion was

00:40:05.480 part of my life that that would be my

00:40:06.920 one issue or something but fentanyl is

00:40:09.200 my one one issue I will be I can be a

00:40:13.640 one-issue voter I could be I could also

00:40:17.520 be a one-issue voter if somebody ran on

00:40:20.040 fixing our election transparency that

00:40:23.520 would turn me into a one one-issue voter

00:40:26.600 as well I think those two things could

00:40:29.680 convert me in which case the stronger

00:40:32.360 candidate I wouldn't care about anything

00:40:33.960 else I wouldn't care about anything else

00:40:35.680 I just say okay if you can give me that

00:40:38.020 one thing we have a deal yeah I would be a

00:40:44.620 one-issue voter if if it was the right

00:40:47.060 issue and the right candidate but we

00:40:48.380 don't have that bring your attention to

00:40:51.020 three to an election system by running

00:40:52.820 place in public domain it's not perfect

00:40:55.300 so there's something called a Ron

00:40:57.340 Rivest R-I-V-E-S-T an election system I

00:41:02.760 know I suppose you could google that but

00:41:04.720 it's a suggested election system that has

00:41:07.680 some advantages I guess somebody paid

00:41:09.880 some money to to raise that comment all

00:41:14.820 right I said I said in my tweet that the

00:41:20.960 fentanyl deaths will be passing a holocaust

00:41:23.260 levels in about a year now that that's off

00:41:27.160 by a factor of at least 10 but I don't care

00:41:31.600 because we're we're not really dealing on a

00:41:35.960 on a reality basis anymore if somebody thought

00:41:40.140 that was true that's fine well Biden's in

00:41:43.480 Israel and it looks to me like his trip to

00:41:48.180 the Middle East is a Trump victory tour it just 0.89

00:41:52.080 happens to be Biden who's taking it so

00:41:54.400 correct me if I'm wrong but the the sort of

00:41:56.800 larger story about his trip to the Middle

00:41:58.560 East is that the Abraham Accords were 0.96

00:42:00.760 really successful am I right that's even

00:42:05.040 CNN is reporting it that way even CNN is

00:42:08.640 reporting that sort of the larger context is

00:42:10.960 that the Abraham Accords were really good and

00:42:14.040 and not only were they good but they're

00:42:16.360 moving the ball further in the direction

00:42:18.680 that was exactly the plan the plan was that

00:42:21.380 the Abraham Accords would you know be a solid

00:42:24.100 foundation for something that they hoped would

00:42:27.260 get bigger and it is I believe it's a hundred

00:42:30.500 percent successful I have never I've heard no

00:42:33.100 criticisms of it yet and Biden's looking to

00:42:36.580 extend it you know to actually make more of it

00:42:40.000 which is exactly the right play and you know

00:42:43.220 that further isolates Iran and makes Israel safer and 0.90

00:42:48.580 it's just good for everybody it's just an obvious

00:42:50.620 good play and it's hard for me to read this

00:42:55.200 story you know it's just mind-boggling that the

00:43:00.820 Trump administration accomplished in my

00:43:02.860 opinion the most successful one term of maybe

00:43:08.400 any president you know it was like one of the

00:43:11.640 most successful first terms I think history will

00:43:14.760 judge it as as one of the great ones honestly I

00:43:17.580 think it's going to be up there with Lincoln and 0.98

00:43:20.720 shit but it's going to take a long time right 0.99

00:43:24.340 it might be a generation who didn't personally 1.00

00:43:27.200 know Trump because if you do if you watched

00:43:31.660 Trump personally you might have like a reaction to

00:43:34.700 his personality but if you wait a hundred years

00:43:37.940 and you're just reading it in a history book and you

00:43:41.200 just see what he did and what he didn't do I feel

00:43:43.820 like it's going to be one of the great ones you

00:43:46.960 know and I have I have tons of my own criticisms I

00:43:50.560 don't think he did enough on health care or fentanyl you

00:43:53.360 know blah blah blah so it's not that he's free of criticism but I think it

00:43:58.880 would be one of the great great presidencies

00:44:00.640 um let's see what else is going on oh here's the funniest story of the day this is what I

00:44:08.920 teased in my live stream title so I mentioned this before but uh the

00:44:14.580 January 6th people they interviewed John Bolton now what you need to know about

00:44:19.180 John Bolton is that he is of course a arch republican

00:44:23.440 uh and normally an arch republican would be pro-Trump but Bolton is famously not pro-Trump

00:44:31.260 all right he is very clearly not pro-Trump so if you take somebody who is an expert on

00:44:39.140 coups and insurrections as John Bolton is nobody doubts that right nobody nobody questions his

00:44:45.540 credentials as somebody who knows how to put on a coup apparently he's experienced um so he

00:44:53.080 doesn't like Trump that's clearly in evidence and he's an expert in the very area that they were

00:44:59.780 at talking about and he said unambiguously no that wasn't that wasn't a coup so the person who is the

00:45:06.760 most expert at telling you what a coup looks like and has every reason to say that Trump tried one 0.99

00:45:12.820 basically laughed it off as fucking stupid really I mean basically he dismissed it with a brush of his 1.00

00:45:21.920 hand like okay that's just stupid that's just stupid it takes a lot of work to put on the coup 1.00

00:45:27.380 there's no evidence that anything like a lot of work happened no this wasn't a coup now what do you do 1.00

00:45:35.780 if you're say CNN and you're the left you've built your entire argument that anybody who looks at anybody

00:45:43.400 like anybody you you don't have to be an expert at all you just look at it it's obviously a coup 0.98

00:45:48.460 that's their point but what happens when the one person who really knows what a fucking coup looks 0.88

00:45:53.660 like says ha ha ha no that's not one that's not even close that's not in the zip code of a coup 0.97

00:46:02.220 you're you're comparing a BB to the sun yeah they're both round that's not a coup you know you're not

00:46:12.740 gonna heat anybody up with a BB so uh this creates a hilarious situation in which CNN has to uh refute

00:46:23.800 the single most experienced coup plotter in America probably they have to find a reason that he's wrong

00:46:33.860 oh get Oliver North now where's Oliver North shouldn't he be on TV ask him if this was a coup

00:46:42.480 good question uh yeah Oliver North he's up in that that category too so uh here's what CNN did

00:46:50.560 uh and you have to read it just for the humor of it uh uh Chris Silliza who's one of the usual

00:46:59.100 anti-Trump you know opinion pieces so he's one of the two or three people who just you know they

00:47:05.120 churn out an anti-Trump piece every every couple days or so and uh he goes on a long explanation of

00:47:13.120 why John Bolton is incorrect in his assessment of what a coup looks like that's right Chris Silliza

00:47:22.040 Silliza whose I believe his uh skill and experience includes uh writing stuff for CNN

00:47:29.300 has decided that the single possibly the single biggest expert on organizing coups in the United

00:47:35.860 States doesn't know what one looks like because this was definitely one now isn't that funny

00:47:43.120 because the desperation of of assigning an opinion writer to debunk an expert

00:47:50.020 it's kind of funny it's sort of desperate but it's also probably going to work right because 0.99

00:47:58.100 their their their viewers are idiots let's let's just be honest I mean at this point you just have 1.00

00:48:03.360 to say that their viewers who believe what they're saying are just idiots at this point 1.00

00:48:07.620 all right now that's probably true of every news source because I think if you believe what 0.99

00:48:13.180 they're saying the opinion people anyway that's that's on you a little bit um so anyway I I would

00:48:21.360 recommend you read that's on CNN's page today just to see how hard he has to work to prove that uh

00:48:28.560 talking to lawyers about delaying the election to improve the audit is really that's what a coup looks

00:48:34.260 like that's what a coup looks like and asking to find votes in the context of an audit that's a real

00:48:41.640 coup john bolton doesn't know what a coup looks like but chris eliza he knows he knows it's when

00:48:47.700 it's when you use words the opposite of how words are used that's what a coup is um so

00:48:54.880 so joe biden is arguing that uh if he runs for president uh the polls show that 92 percent of

00:49:02.120 democrats would vote for him if he ran for president that's not enough is it can somebody help me with

00:49:10.220 the math if biden got 92 percent of democrat voters wouldn't he lose by a lot am i wrong about

00:49:18.960 am i wrong about that yeah now

00:49:22.260 i'm pretty sure that means he lost and he's so brain dead that he's making an argument that that's

00:49:32.660 why you should vote for him if why you should vote for him is his mathematical proof that he can't win

00:49:38.720 and and democrats are can i do may i do an impression of a democrat uh buying into that argument

00:49:47.220 right so this will be my impression of a democrat listening to that argument and and buying into

00:49:54.160 it sounds good right so biden says uh the polls say jack listen jack the polls say 92 percent of

00:50:03.760 democrats would vote for me if i run again and now my impression of a democrat buying that argument 0.99

00:50:09.540 oh sounds right i mean how dumb do you have to be 1.00

00:50:16.540 to think that this brain dead fucker uh is your best chance all right well this gives me to uh an 0.99

00:50:26.020 awkward place with my audience now remember i remind you that you don't watch this live stream 0.98

00:50:34.360 because you agree with me am i right i guess that part you might agree you don't watch it because you

00:50:39.920 agree with me you you watch it because you might hear something different and you know that might make

00:50:45.560 you you know like improve your own opinion doesn't have to match mine there's no requirement there

00:50:50.520 but it might improve it just by seeing what the opposite arguments looks like here's my argument

00:50:56.080 that uh well and and i tweeted today that i owe the public a firm opinion on this and the reason i owe

00:51:03.340 the public this is because uh i have publicly supported trump as president for so long that i i think i

00:51:13.540 i have a public obligation to give my current opinion and my my public opinion is firm i can't support

00:51:21.260 uh anybody that age for president so just age you i know you'd like to talk about you know his policies

00:51:28.560 and stuff like that but i'm sorry i can't i can't support anybody that age now it'll get interesting if

00:51:34.840 he gets nominated anyway trump does and let's say biden gets nominated well then i'm going to be stuck

00:51:41.620 all right because i would have two choices that are unambiguously not not the minimum requirement

00:51:49.140 for me but i'd still choose one uh you know under those conditions but i'm not going to promise you

00:51:55.480 it would be trump if the democrats run somebody young against somebody old it's going to be a tough

00:52:02.540 choice it's going to be a tough choice yeah gavin newsom if you run gavin newsom against trump you're

00:52:10.260 really running uh republican policies against democrat policies at which point i guess you'd

00:52:16.420 be voting for the policies more than the person so you know that changes a little bit if you get to

00:52:21.160 the finals but in terms of the primaries um i'm not going to support any democrat or any anybody

00:52:27.940 any any republican at a certain age and i think that uh the medical community needs to help us

00:52:35.040 stand here you know i don't know who it would be the ama what what would be the appropriate medical body

00:52:41.060 that should get together and just give us just give us a rule of thumb i don't think it needs to be a

00:52:47.100 law i don't think it needs to be a constitutional change i would just like i would just like somebody

00:52:53.480 who knows what they're talking about to give us a a risk related assessment of what too old looks

00:53:00.200 like for a president right now of course there's you know tremendous individual difference some

00:53:06.440 people are too old as 65 you agree with that right clearly some people are too old as 65 also

00:53:14.360 some people are not too old and 80 it's rare but we're not talking about um specific people

00:53:23.980 we're talking about what is a good rule of thumb where we should just you know minimize our risk

00:53:29.940 and i don't know what that number is but let the medical community tell us you know maybe it's 75

00:53:35.320 and here's here's the pushback to people uh you know i didn't want to embarrass people by tweeting

00:53:42.600 you know doing a retweet to them if you're if you're saying to me trump looks like he's in great

00:53:49.780 shape today you're not on the same topic i'm not arguing about today who thought i was talking about

00:53:57.260 today so don't give me an argument about today because that's not even the topic if you can

00:54:04.140 predict what trump will look like in six years you know let's say two years of campaigning plus four

00:54:09.700 years of office if you can tell me what trump will be like in six years well you're you're a psychic

00:54:15.660 you're a psychic and i would like to know what else you're investing in i want to pattern my life

00:54:22.540 after your accurate predictions nobody knows what anybody looks like in six years do you think you

00:54:27.660 know what i'll look like in six years in my opinion i'm too old to be president if i were to run now

00:54:33.420 so let's say i'd be 67 in office i'd be in my 70s you know when i yeah that's too old so uh

00:54:49.740 yeah well if you said that uh we're voting for somebody who will be president for three months

00:54:54.940 i'd say yeah you know today's a pretty good indicator of that but not six years

00:55:03.580 um well i'm not too old by the standard of the united states i'm suggesting we change the standard

00:55:09.500 i'm suggesting we change the standard now we have gotten away with this right i think reagan had lost it 0.73

00:55:17.580 but you know maybe his advisors whatever kept it together it's obvious that biden has lost it

00:55:23.020 it does appear that his advisors are you know keeping the ship afloat so we do have mechanisms

00:55:28.700 to you know protect a degraded president but it's not a risk we should you know willingly put ourselves

00:55:34.460 into don't willingly put yourself into that situation so and stop telling me how healthy trump looks

00:55:41.980 because you don't know what he looks like next year much less six years now

00:55:45.740 all right um do you know the most important job of a vice president the political part all right

00:55:55.740 the most important job of a vice president is to take over if needed but if you don't need to take over

00:56:03.420 you know in the meantime what's the most important thing politically just politically that a vice president does

00:56:09.340 is make the president look good right the main job of the vice president is to make the president look good

00:56:17.180 and i'm going to compliment kamal harris because every time there's one of these uh 0.95

00:56:23.340 gaff videos of biden uh unable to read the teleprompter or just saying dumb 0.74

00:56:31.020 within 24 hours there'll be uh kamal harris will top it with her own babble talk 1.00

00:56:37.420 and i'm wondering if that's a coincidence

00:56:43.100 it's almost as if the democrats i don't believe this but it just it looks as if it looks as if the

00:56:48.620 democrats uh try to put out a they put kamala harris out there every time biden fucks up 0.96

00:56:55.580 because she's even worse she's literally the only person you could even imagine 0.99

00:57:01.340 that you would put in that job who could make biden look better

00:57:03.980 let me ask you the true true question think of all the vice presidents in the history of vice

00:57:10.780 presidents name one other vice president who could have pulled this off making joe biden look like a

00:57:18.300 better public speaker no dan dan quayle was actually a little bit better than kamala harris but that's that's 0.99

00:57:28.140 well chosen well chosen yeah maybe dan quayle um i'll give you dan quayle i'll give you that yeah he was

00:57:37.820 the same situation you know i i always uh i always made fun of dan quayle because he was a vice president's

00:57:43.740 vice president have you ever heard me make that point before right so let's say somebody runs for

00:57:50.780 president and they of course reagan so reagan runs for president he picks a vice president who is strong

00:57:58.300 but clearly not reagan's wrong so that's you know george bush senior now george bush senior then runs

00:58:05.180 for president but he's already not reagan right he's already george bush now he's got to find somebody

00:58:11.180 that's below him now below him i mean in charisma right it's mostly a charisma you know how much do

00:58:18.700 people like him how much would they like that person to be president instead of you so the worst situation

00:58:24.940 for america is for somebody's vice president to later run for president because then you have a

00:58:31.660 vice president's vice president and you've diluted your talent twice your perfect situation is if you

00:58:40.700 have a vice president who never takes the job and never gets back into politics

00:58:46.060 your worst situation is your vice president goes on to be president and then picks the vice president

00:58:51.980 because now you're two levels of charisma charisma below and that's what you know imagine imagine

00:58:59.340 kamala harris getting the nomination and having to pick a vice president who looks weaker than she does

00:59:08.860 do you see it yet if she ran for president she would have to because of the contrast principle she would 1.00

00:59:15.980 have to pick somebody that the public said oh yeah you know definitely kamala is the stronger one but 1.00

00:59:22.060 that vice president could probably do the job too she would have to pick somebody weaker than her 1.00

00:59:28.060 buddha judge would look stronger because he at least talks better 0.95

00:59:33.500 aoc yeah can't pick aoc because she looks stronger there's nothing she could do i don't 0.98

00:59:39.100 yeah swalwell okay you got me yeah kamala harris could pick swalwell and he would look weaker 0.93

00:59:47.500 or schiff you could pick adam schiff

00:59:52.700 all right well the pope uh has uh said that joe biden's opinion being pro-abortion

01:00:02.620 while being a catholic at the same time is quote incoherence so uh now god has uh uh indicated he

01:00:12.300 will vote republican that may be i don't know if i've taken that too far but my understanding is that

01:00:19.740 the pope uh is closer to you know god's opinion than we are which is you know why you need a pope

01:00:26.060 and if the pope thinks that biden is incoherent on this topic um it feels like i feel like god has a

01:00:36.140 chosen republican i don't know is that is that too far

01:00:41.820 god talked to the pope the pope made his opinion i don't know just just put that out there

01:00:48.940 um let's see oh it looks like i just printed my notes twice and i don't have as many as i thought i did

01:01:00.380 well with that well that apparently is an indication that the best thing that's ever happened to you is

01:01:09.660 somebody paid two dollars uh to say that uh l plus garfield better than dilbert plus

01:01:16.380 jim davis owned you somebody paid two dollars to say that garfield is better than dilbert

01:01:23.100 you know what that's the kind of criticism i want more of

01:01:27.820 if there's anybody else on youtube so you on youtube they have a feature where they can

01:01:31.980 pay to have their comments if there's anybody else there who would like to me to see a comment

01:01:38.300 about let's say another comic strip that's better than dilbert

01:01:42.060 because i'll read your comment for ten dollars for ten dollars i will read your insult oh let's do

01:01:50.140 this for ten dollars or more uh in uh whatever that super chat fee is if anybody would like me to read

01:02:00.060 their insult of me i will read your insult of me without a comment and i won't even add my own comment

01:02:07.820 to it so now i will i will allow you to for a fee have me insult myself with your insult go any takers

01:02:25.580 nothing i'm getting nothing over there all right you guys need to look at each other

01:02:29.900 uh youtube i would like to introduce you to locals locals meet youtube and i'd like the two of you to

01:02:41.420 work this out for me uh well i got a ten dollar tip with no with no insult did anybody all right nothing

01:02:49.580 noise by hand all right so you say hi to everybody over there

01:02:57.580 all right that's enough that's enough that's enough back to me let's put the attention back on me where

01:03:04.700 it belongs all right so i guess there's no takers but uh um yeah it's like comparing cats to the office

01:03:15.420 all right so uh those of you on youtube do you have any questions for me before i go i'll give you

01:03:22.700 uh three seconds see if anything good comes up uh the dominion case well let me talk about that uh

01:03:31.660 i don't know that i don't know what the update is on the dominion case the only curiosity i have is there

01:03:37.420 is there going to be anything in the discovery there that would allow somebody to look at their code

01:03:45.420 that would that would be that would be interesting that's the only thing i care about really

01:03:51.100 uh no you got to pay for that comment i'm not going to read your burke breathed comment 0.98

01:03:56.460 that's the deal i mean you can comment if you want but i'm not going to read it unless unless

01:04:01.500 you pay a super chat fee

01:04:05.900 uh have you got bow what's that mean please tweet the 12 trump hoaxes to joe rogan

01:04:13.420 um yeah yeah i don't uh uh uh should i yeah here's the thing um here's what's stopping me

01:04:29.740 there's there's sort of a famous person code

01:04:34.380 about how uh let's say i'll say public figures not famous people they're they're sort of a public

01:04:40.380 figures sort of a unwritten code about how much you interact and in what way and uh you're bugging

01:04:49.260 joe rogan to do my content would not be within that you know reasonable you know field because i

01:04:57.180 would why wouldn't i want him to retweet everything i do right why why don't i want all the famous people

01:05:03.900 i want i know i know to retweet everything so you have to you have to have some sort of uh guard

01:05:10.540 rails there and uh you know anybody can follow anybody on twitter if he's if joe rogan or anybody

01:05:18.140 else sees something um

01:05:23.980 yeah i don't think i'm seeing a comment there i don't agree with

01:05:27.820 it now there would be exceptions you know let's say i knew there was one person who really could

01:05:34.860 move the the needle and it was one topic that was my one most important topic i might do it

01:05:41.580 but you would you really want to be sparing about that now people do it with me as well right i know

01:05:47.420 lots of public figures and public figures are often sending me tweets and asking me to retweet them

01:05:54.140 and there are a number of people that i i do retweet on a pretty regular basis

01:05:59.020 jeff pilkington you've seen me retweet him a number of times and it's because it's a very

01:06:03.420 high value account one of the things he does which is interesting is he he treats both sides left and

01:06:10.940 right as if they're both valid imagine that so if you want to follow somebody who actually legitimately

01:06:19.980 treats both sides like he's just looking at them objectively and there are very few people who do

01:06:26.140 it follow him so when he sends me something it's usually in that vein and that's right in my sweet

01:06:31.260 spot so of course i retweet it um there are a number of other people like that sort of itch i retweet a

01:06:36.940 lot why because when he says something i think shit i haven't seen this anywhere that's important 0.82

01:06:44.060 i don't even know if it's true but if it comes from a you know a credible source it's worth talking 0.54

01:06:48.700 about so yeah there are a number and anything elon musk says is public interest you know so there's some

01:06:55.340 things that i would uh retweet somewhat automatically if it's in my wheelhouse for example you see me

01:07:01.660 retweet um corey deangelis stuff about uh school choice i'm not i'm not an automatic retweeter of

01:07:10.620 everything he tweets but you know such a high value high value uh stuff on um school choice which i

01:07:18.860 think is the answer to systemic racism in the long run you got to get the schools working for everybody

01:07:25.100 or else you don't really have a decent country without that i mean there are two things i i take as my

01:07:30.860 standard for how you're doing as a country one would be does everybody have health care you know

01:07:39.740 in a reasonable way and is everybody getting educated well and we're not so those are two things which i

01:07:49.260 think we can't really claim greatness when those two things aren't working we can claim we're doing

01:07:56.140 better than other countries in some areas sure but you can't you can't claim greatness if you don't

01:08:02.300 have health care and education for everybody that's not greatness that's just doing well that's okay too

01:08:09.500 maybe it's the best you can do who knows but it's not greatness we could be great that's within our

01:08:17.260 ability the united states could be great we're short of it and by the way there's nothing more american

01:08:24.780 than saying that you're short of your standard if there's anybody not from america who hears me

01:08:30.300 saying this you're going to say to yourself hey are you you insulting your own country no no here's what 0.99

01:08:38.380 you need to know about america if i can't shit on my flag in public i don't care about that flag 0.99

01:08:46.140 if i can't set it on fire and you know deface it in public i don't want that flag no no i want the 0.99

01:08:55.260 one that you can burn and it gets stronger i want the country i can criticize and it gets stronger 0.99

01:09:01.900 that's my country my country is i get i get to i get to punch it if it deserves it right i get to punch 0.97

01:09:10.300 it so you that's mostly what i do on twitter is punch things that deserve it and i like that that's

01:09:17.900 the country i want to live in so if you hear me say something about america that's bad uh that's

01:09:24.540 different than if it's the president overseas i'm a little uncomfortable with our president

01:09:29.660 you know dumping on the country overseas uh it's not the worst thing in the world but i'm

01:09:34.380 uncomfortable with it but when you see a citizen of the country insulting the country just know that

01:09:41.340 that's uh patriotic like the the purpose of it is to fix it make it better so what makes this country

01:09:49.100 great is that we can attack it continuously and it gets stronger we we harden our own country by just

01:09:57.900 continuous attacks self-attacks you know that whatever the outside world has to throw at america

01:10:05.260 you know other than nukes i suppose but there's pretty much nothing that an outside entity can

01:10:10.860 throw at america that we haven't already thrown at ourselves and you know had some practice tacos

01:10:19.180 you know the whole uh jill let let me give a a full uh support for jill biden in that taco situation 1.00

01:10:27.260 i get that it's fun to make fun of her for you know what was an inelegant you know ill-advised

01:10:33.180 speech or something but let's be serious jill biden doesn't have any bad feelings about anybody i doubt

01:10:43.180 so so yeah give her a break that's just not where you we shouldn't spend any time on that

01:10:49.900 that that story we should have been a zero should have been a zero because really i don't think there

01:10:56.060 any hispanics are going to say oh i'd change my vote because she said that taco thing yeah 1.00

01:11:03.900 um she's she's a phd doctor

01:11:06.540 i don't punch i pull interesting

01:11:14.380 do you think trump would meet with putin to discuss ending the war oh that's an interesting

01:11:19.500 question well there's no way that can happen with a democrat um with a democrat and i don't think it

01:11:27.260 could happen with a with a democrat president and there's no way it could happen with a republican

01:11:31.500 president because they wouldn't want to give up that power to you know trump no i don't think

01:11:35.820 i don't think it can happen i don't see a way that there's a path to that

01:11:43.260 all right um carrie talked to iran and shouldn't have 0.57

01:11:49.980 well

01:11:50.220 uh but i do hate mondays scott and dilbert are great well thank you somebody actually paid to

01:12:02.300 compliment me that's that was unnecessary but appreciated uh dennis rodman meeting with putin

01:12:10.860 worth a shot

01:12:11.580 all right uh that's all for now youtube i'll talk to you tomorrow

01:12:25.180 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 14, 2022

Episode 1804 Scott Adams： John Bolton Destroyed The Insurrection Narrative And It Is Hilarious

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript