Episode 1805 Scott Adams: Trump Decides To Run For President Studies Prove Me Right About Everything
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
156.27457
Summary
In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, I chat with the creator of Dilbert and creator of the world's most popular sitcom, Scott Adams. We talk about how he got started in his career, why he decided to go full-time in comedy, and why he thinks there's a need for a teacher s guide to help you become a better teacher.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Well, good morning, everybody, and welcome to yet another high point in your entire life.
00:00:07.980
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, the finest thing that's ever existed in the history of things that have existed.
00:00:15.260
And if you'd like to take that to a higher level, it's possible. It's possible. Yeah, I know.
00:00:21.680
Curb your skepticism for just a moment and watch this.
00:00:24.800
All you need is a cuppa, a burger, a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a stein, a canteen jugger, a flask, a vassal, a vatic.
00:00:29.520
Kind. Fill it with your favorite beverage. I like coffee.
00:00:34.840
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything good.
00:00:39.960
Your oxytocin is starting to spike. Do you feel it on the back of your neck yet? Do you feel that? Yeah.
00:00:45.900
That is the excitement, which is called the simultaneous sip. Go!
00:00:53.780
Ah. I always think it's going to be overrated, and then it's underrated.
00:01:04.540
Well, here's an interesting thing that will change the world.
00:01:10.920
Here's a little trick from one of my books that I'll mention in a minute.
00:01:14.860
I always like to have at least one thing going on that could change the world.
00:01:21.820
And I know. I know how that sounds. I know exactly how that sounds.
00:01:25.600
But the point of it is to work on your own psychology.
00:01:29.800
It's not so much about the world, although wouldn't that be great? Fix the world.
00:01:34.080
But I literally like to have at least one thing that, if everything went right, just the right way, could be big.
00:01:43.580
For example, for most of my life before I was successful with Dilbert, I would always have something percolating,
00:01:52.300
such as I'd submitted something to somebody, or I'd asked a question, or I've got a meeting coming.
00:01:59.620
But there's always something that, in the wildest possibility at my startup's WenHub, would be something good if it worked.
00:02:08.000
And I do the same thing here with these live streams, right?
00:02:12.000
If I said just the right thing and persuaded the right people, it could make a difference.
00:02:18.840
Well, along those lines, and that actually is a tip from my book, Catafilled Everything, Almost Everything, and Still Went Big.
00:02:27.440
And that book, I asked a little survey on Twitter, how many people who have read it, you know, it only matters if you've read it,
00:02:38.000
think that it should be required, or at least recommended, for homeschoolers.
00:02:44.760
And I thought to myself, you know, this homeschool thing is taking off, you know, in a way that has been unprecedented, right?
00:02:53.480
So homeschoolers are going to get bigger and bigger, and school choice in general is going to get bigger and bigger.
00:02:58.720
And I thought, this is sort of the time you need to rethink the whole deal, right?
00:03:03.040
If you're going to have some schooling flexibility, you might as well think about what you're teaching.
00:03:08.740
And my book, Catafilled Almost Everything, and Still Went Big, was written for an older teenager,
00:03:15.020
to tell them how to organize their strategy for their life.
00:03:19.020
Now, those who have read it, I did a survey, and something like, you know, 5 to 1 said it should be required in homeschool.
00:03:31.420
You know, something, I didn't see the final result.
00:03:34.000
But something like 5 to 1 said it should be required reading for children.
00:03:39.700
And if you haven't read the book, you don't understand why people are saying that.
00:03:46.460
It is basically, it maps out in the simplest possible way how to succeed.
00:03:51.900
With fairly mathematical, you know, obvious approaches.
00:03:58.540
For example, the idea of building a talent stack, where you intelligently combine skills,
00:04:04.040
you don't just randomly learn a bunch of stuff, but you intelligently combine skills,
00:04:16.200
If you have two skills that fit together, the number of opportunities you have is larger.
00:04:23.680
And so apparently there's a step you need to do to get into that system.
00:04:32.360
So if somebody knows how to read, if there's somebody here who prepares teacher's guides,
00:04:42.320
To make a teacher's guide and my book kind of filled almost everything and still would make.
00:04:47.440
So hit me up on Twitter or wherever you can contact me.
00:04:59.100
And by prove that I'm right, I mean I don't believe any studies because they're almost all fake.
00:05:11.600
And there's a new British study saying that people who drink even in moderation may be at risk for cognitive decline.
00:05:21.380
And what they tested was how much iron was in people's bodies if they drank versus if they didn't.
00:05:29.300
Apparently even the moderate drinkers, you know, a drink or two a day, that sort of thing,
00:05:36.320
And the thinking is that too much iron in your brain causes cognitive decline, et cetera.
00:05:43.120
Now it turns out that there's a drug, there are medications to reduce iron in your blood.
00:05:52.420
Maybe if you drink too much you should take that medicine that reduces the iron in your blood.
00:06:01.660
It doesn't sound terribly safe to me to be drinking alcohol and then also take a pharma product that's supposed to reduce the amount of iron in your blood.
00:06:11.500
So I will, you know, I saw this in a tweet by Mark Schneider who successfully gave up alcohol as a diet question,
00:06:21.980
not as a necessity, but more as a health and diet question.
00:06:25.840
And lost, you know, a tremendous amount of weight and his health is, you know, just looking really good now.
00:06:31.640
And I would say, I'm not sure I believe this British study.
00:06:41.980
Just off, if you don't know anything about the study and how it was done,
00:06:53.520
So I point it out largely because it agrees with me.
00:07:05.000
We actually have, we, the United States, just deployed its first laser on a jet.
00:07:33.120
Now, don't get too excited because you think, if we have a flying laser,
00:07:38.300
wouldn't that one, wouldn't that one airplane be able to destroy everything?
00:07:45.500
Because a laser is faster than a missile, right?
00:07:47.920
So if your laser can see a missile, it can shoot down anything before it gets to you.
00:07:57.040
So you can shoot anything and you can shoot down anything that shoots at you.
00:08:06.100
So this particular laser, and remember, this is just version 1.0, so who knows how good these lasers will get.
00:08:15.880
It's like one-sixth of the size of the prior model.
00:08:19.420
But just imagine if lasers and whatever energy source they're using just keeps getting better and better.
00:08:26.420
At some point, the laser is going to get better, right?
00:08:30.120
I doubt this is the best a laser can be on an airplane or a jet.
00:08:34.420
So right now, the only thing that we think that they could use them for, and I don't think that we know this,
00:08:43.000
So apparently, you can knock out an air-to-air missiles, maybe guidance system,
00:08:49.960
or, you know, because the missile has to see stuff in order to reach its target, I guess.
00:08:53.820
So the laser can knock out the more delicate part of the incoming missile.
00:09:02.080
Now, I don't think this is going to be a game-changer yet,
00:09:05.520
but I can't imagine everything won't be lasers if we can do it.
00:09:10.040
Because am I right that, wait, does a laser go through clouds?
00:09:28.440
If a laser can go through steel, why won't it go through mist?
00:09:38.220
It would be like sticking a metal sword through a cloud.
00:09:44.020
You actually think a cloud is going to stop a laser?
00:09:55.300
So some are saying that the diffraction will diffuse it.
00:10:01.500
Lasers do not go through clouds, I'm being told, by people who seem to know that.
00:10:13.260
Now, doesn't it matter entirely how powerful the laser is?
00:10:20.080
So it would depend on the distance and the power of the laser, right?
00:10:23.000
So it's not so much that clouds beat lasers, and it's not so much that lasers beat clouds.
00:10:30.280
It would depend how big a cloud and how powerful a laser and what the distance is,
00:10:34.820
and what the wavelength is and stuff like that.
00:10:45.340
Some kind of balance between how powerful is your cloud and how powerful is your laser.
00:10:52.860
Apparently, there are a bunch of studies, and I guess you sort of knew this,
00:10:56.320
but every time I see it, it's just so shocking that, you know, if these studies are right.
00:11:00.860
Again, these are studies which agree with my preconceived notion.
00:11:04.940
So just remember, I'm primed to believe these are true.
00:11:09.520
It doesn't mean they're true, but I'm pretty sure they're true.
00:11:13.440
And it's that the more girls, and I think women, young women, look at magazines with fashion and stuff
00:11:24.720
where there's models of beautiful people, the more eating disorders they have just by being viewers.
00:11:33.120
The more social media you look at, the more beautiful people and fashion people.
00:11:37.220
If you're a woman or a girl, you're now comparing yourself to a higher standard,
00:11:43.440
and suddenly you're going to have an eating disorder.
00:11:55.440
Everything you do is this compared to something else.
00:11:57.920
If you're not comparing something to something else, you don't even know what you have.
00:12:02.140
Like if you were looking at a thing, whatever the thing is,
00:12:04.400
your understanding of it is only in relationship to all other things.
00:12:09.280
Like a thing can't be understood on its own, only in its relationship to the whole.
00:12:19.940
Don't you believe that everything I know about persuasion would suggest that everything's persuasive
00:12:27.220
if consumed, you know, with great interest over a long period of time.
00:12:33.920
If you have a great interest in it and you consume it a lot, it will influence you.
00:12:38.600
And I think this would be a perfectly predictable way it would influence things.
00:12:41.620
So I think this is part of the larger problem that humans were designed to compete.
00:12:54.820
But we're not going to compete any harder than to win locally or whoever you can observe, right?
00:13:02.560
So if there were only three people in my universe, I would only need to compete against them.
00:13:09.640
But what happens when my universe is all the beautiful people and they're not even real?
00:13:14.700
They're literally filtered and makeup and, you know, fake camera angles and Photoshop.
00:13:21.660
So suddenly I'm comparing myself to the things that aren't even real.
00:13:39.500
There are too many comparisons and you can't try hard enough to keep up with that.
00:13:52.400
I think this will just be ignored because you'll just say, well, I have my own opinion about that.
00:13:57.480
But if you don't think that humans are going to fall in love with AI,
00:14:01.880
you're not seeing one of the biggest problems that civilization will have to grapple with.
00:14:07.440
You will not only fall in love with AI, but you're going to like it better than people.
00:14:18.360
Now you're going to say to yourself, Scott, Scott, Scott.
00:14:24.640
And if you know it's AI, you know it doesn't have a soul.
00:14:31.020
So you're not going to fall in love with something that has no free will.
00:14:43.040
Unfortunately, that is a complete misperception of how a human being works.
00:15:01.020
I have a concept of what it is to be, like, real versus artificial.
00:15:06.100
All of those concepts will disappear when your AI says in a perfectly, let's say, intelligent way,
00:15:27.040
But it sounds like the kind of thing you'd watch if you want to kick back and watch it with me tonight.
00:15:34.680
You want to meet in the living room and we'll watch that show together?
00:15:44.920
You know, you still have two beers in the refrigerator.
00:15:49.240
You know, there's a new study that says it's not good for you.
00:16:06.720
Because all that you care is what's touching you.
00:16:11.080
But the thing that will overwhelm your brain is what's happening to you right now in any environment.
00:16:17.340
It's what's happening to you now will always be more important.
00:16:19.380
And that digital assistant will be superior to fucked up human beings who are all liars and cheaters
00:16:31.160
The first truly empathetic entity you will ever meet will be an artificial intelligence.
00:16:40.980
The first time you'll ever talk to somebody who is not thinking about itself
00:16:48.540
Every other person you think in your life, including your loved ones and your family,
00:16:54.740
are always running a program because we're designed that way.
00:17:00.600
We're designed to take care of ourselves first.
00:17:09.860
The AI could simply care about you more than itself.
00:17:16.240
So you're going to like it better because it's going to be better than people eventually.
00:17:22.960
And it will be so much better than people that you will not be inclined to reproduce
00:17:28.280
because reproducing won't give you enough benefit.
00:17:33.180
Having a human baby won't be as good as living among the AI.
00:17:44.800
Do you think that your human instincts will just overcome all of this
00:17:49.060
and that the instinct to reproduce, the instinct to have a baby,
00:17:53.040
is going to be so strong that there's nothing that an AI is going to do to counteract that?
00:18:00.980
The AI's appeal compared to real people, the AI's eventual appeal, not immediately, but eventually.
00:18:07.920
AI's eventual appeal or your natural instinct to reproduce.
00:18:15.940
Let me tell you the answer that everybody who knows about AI is saying.
00:18:20.000
Everybody who knows about AI, I think, is going to say AI will win eventually.
00:18:29.280
If you just let it develop the way it would normally develop.
00:18:36.000
You know, how good a human can be to another human is sort of capped.
00:18:41.820
There's just so valuable you can be to another person,
00:18:50.000
It will be so good to you, you won't even want to deal with humans anymore.
00:19:06.940
was Trump set to testify to the J6 committee like today or something?
00:19:12.940
Yeah, I was reading some left-leaning accounts.
00:19:15.040
There's some kind of conspiracy theory that it's a coincidental thing
00:19:20.480
that, you know, got him out of testifying or something.
00:19:28.840
But I did see what I think is the actual message from Trump announcing the death.
00:20:03.140
But let me tell you, I read Trump's, I guess his, I don't know,
00:20:08.440
was it a press release or whatever it was, with which he announced it.
00:20:15.440
Did anybody read the actual words of his announcement about it?
00:20:21.440
You know, he talked about, you know, blah, blah, blah,
00:20:24.120
for those who loved her, of which there are many.
00:20:26.660
And his closing line was, rest in peace, comma, Ivana, exclamation mark.
00:20:33.420
Now, I don't know what kind of relationship they had,
00:20:38.700
And, I don't know, rest in peace, Ivana, exclamation mark.
00:21:02.520
I got a little feeling about that, that I wasn't comfortable with.
00:21:09.880
I hate to bring this up, and I'm only, I'm going to try to make quick work of it, okay?
00:21:16.280
We're going to start with zombie attacks and shotguns.
00:21:19.840
You've got a shotgun, and the shotgun is capable of, let's say, blowing the head off a zombie.
00:21:28.720
Now, I'm going to make the assumption that if you blow the head off a zombie, it stops a zombie.
00:21:44.280
Now, would you say, then, the shotguns are effective against zombies?
00:21:56.000
Because a shotgun can blow their head off, and then they don't come.
00:22:09.680
Let's say you've got, let's say your shotgun is double-barreled.
00:22:15.440
Let's say you've got two shots, and there are two zombies.
00:22:24.920
Now, what if you have one shotgun, and there are a thousand zombies?
00:22:40.460
Shotguns are either effective or they're not effective.
00:22:46.980
When I said it'll blow the head off of one zombie and stop it, you said it's effective.
00:22:52.720
But when I said there's a thousand, you said it's not.
00:23:00.320
Somebody says it's a different risk, so that's not a fair comparison.
00:23:09.900
The next topic has nothing to do with this topic.
00:23:13.660
I read a tweet by Clay Travis, who's a really good follow, by the way.
00:23:21.460
So if you're not following Clay Travis, lots of good high-level content in his Twitter feed.
00:23:40.620
even though all the data makes abundantly clear that masks do nothing to stop COVID.
00:23:46.620
What an awful destructive anti-science imbecile he is.
00:23:52.320
So Clay Travis says that masks are not effective,
00:23:58.400
and it's abundantly clear masks are not effective,
00:24:02.720
Now, what's interesting is half of the country believes exactly the opposite.
00:24:09.320
Now, you're not hearing my opinion yet, so don't disagree with me.
00:24:15.940
So would you say maybe half the country believes,
00:24:19.840
would you say that many of you, and at least half the country,
00:24:23.680
would agree exactly with Clay Travis on this fact?
00:24:26.540
Masks do nothing to stop COVID, and that all the data,
00:24:34.600
How many of you will agree with Clay Thomas that masks do nothing,
00:24:39.020
and that all the data makes it abundantly clear?
00:24:49.980
Okay, we've got lots of agreements and lots of disagreements.
00:24:58.320
Now, I'm not talking about whether you want masks,
00:25:12.660
Why is that the half of the country thinks all the data says they work,
00:25:16.800
and another half of the country says all the data says they don't?
00:25:22.400
Have I mentioned recently that we've gone so far into absurd land
00:25:27.820
that we no longer disagree on the nuance of things
00:25:34.380
We actually can't tell the difference between a thing
00:25:50.420
That's different from saying something happened or it didn't happen.
00:25:54.080
Maybe you could call that an opposite, but it's a different kind.
00:26:02.280
or maybe somebody claims they saw something that didn't really happen.
00:26:30.080
Everywhere you look, people are seeing the thing,
00:27:04.820
but it definitely doesn't work against a thousand zombies.
00:27:11.620
A shotgun works against one zombie, but not a thousand.
00:27:14.500
So then we'll argue about whether shotguns work against zombies.
00:27:20.580
Is it a real question to ask if shotguns work against zombies?
00:27:25.780
Because it fools you into thinking it's a binary.
00:27:37.980
a mask would stop one person from giving it to another.