Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 18, 2022


Episode 1808 Scott Adams: Apparently, Government Officials Lied To Us About Everything. Surprised?


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 12 minutes

Words per Minute

145.09387

Word Count

10,586

Sentence Count

779

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

30


Summary

In this episode of the highlight of civilization, Scott Adams talks about his recent predictions about China and why they didn t come true. He also talks about a new concept he's working on for the show, and why he thinks it's going to be called Coffee with Scott Adams.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:08.860 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:10.780 You could probably guess why it's called that, and you'd be right.
00:00:15.100 And that would be yet another victory for your intelligence.
00:00:19.060 And if you'd like to, take it up a notch.
00:00:21.860 Who wants to take it up a notch?
00:00:23.260 Yes, you do.
00:00:24.180 All you do is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice,
00:00:26.360 and a canteen jug or a glass, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:30.480 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:33.160 I like coffee.
00:00:34.960 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:37.680 It's the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:40.640 It's called the simultaneous sip.
00:00:42.880 Happens now. Go.
00:00:47.580 Well, I think what we're going to do,
00:00:49.780 I'm starting to settle on a Coffee with Scott Adams mug theme.
00:00:54.980 But here's the first thing I've decided.
00:00:57.980 There's going to be two sides.
00:01:00.140 There's going to be Coffee with Scott Adams on one side,
00:01:02.800 and Man Cave with Scott Adams on the other.
00:01:07.900 Now, it might be the simultaneous sip versus the simultaneous rip,
00:01:12.620 but that might be too insider.
00:01:14.160 I don't know.
00:01:14.960 It's going to be one of those things.
00:01:16.880 But we're doing a group designing concept here.
00:01:21.080 People are sending me ideas.
00:01:22.280 And so far, I'm kind of liking that one.
00:01:28.460 Well, let's check in on Scott's big predictions
00:01:32.060 that people said, that's crazy.
00:01:34.760 And one of them is that people would start reducing
00:01:37.000 the business that they do in China.
00:01:40.480 Do you know why?
00:01:41.900 What is the phrase that I was saying, oh, three years ago?
00:01:47.280 Do you remember a persuasion phrase that I was using about China?
00:01:53.100 Let's see if anybody uses it.
00:01:55.580 Too risky.
00:01:57.180 Too risky.
00:01:57.880 A decouple is something everybody used.
00:02:00.080 But I said China is too risky for business.
00:02:04.720 And everybody laughed.
00:02:06.820 And people said, Scott, people are doing business with China like crazy.
00:02:12.220 And there's just going to be more of it.
00:02:14.460 Scott, there's just going to be more of it.
00:02:17.560 If there's one thing I can tell you, Scott, your prediction is pretty dumb
00:02:21.080 because people are going to be trusting China.
00:02:24.120 They're just going to...
00:02:25.520 Well, Bloomberg reports today.
00:02:27.880 And remember, Bloomberg does business in China.
00:02:30.980 So Bloomberg does have an incentive to say nice things about China.
00:02:34.960 Am I right?
00:02:36.840 Do you all agree with that?
00:02:38.740 That Bloomberg does business in China.
00:02:40.560 And so they're reporting, you would think maybe there's a little influence there
00:02:45.700 to say good things about China.
00:02:49.300 But apparently they did not hold back on this article.
00:02:53.700 So congratulations for Bloomberg for doing reporting
00:02:57.720 that counters what looks like their own corporate interests are.
00:03:01.860 Should we call that out?
00:03:04.000 Right?
00:03:04.540 I'm always criticizing people for being in the tank for one side or not.
00:03:08.880 But let's call that out.
00:03:10.520 That's worthy of our respect.
00:03:13.780 What Bloomberg says is that investors are shying away from China
00:03:18.400 because of President Xi's own internal policies,
00:03:22.760 which is a pretty direct criticism, isn't it?
00:03:26.360 They're actually criticizing Xi by name.
00:03:30.020 And that's Bloomberg.
00:03:30.780 So how many of you thought, when I was saying that China is too risky for business,
00:03:37.580 how many of you thought that that was going to play out?
00:03:41.240 Did you think that a couple years later it would be common knowledge
00:03:44.440 that China is too risky for business?
00:03:47.560 How many of you thought that that was going to happen?
00:03:49.900 Seriously.
00:03:51.200 Did you really think that the battleship was going to change in two years?
00:03:55.200 Like somehow it was going to reverse course?
00:03:56.940 Well, you have much faith.
00:04:00.720 You have a lot of faith.
00:04:03.060 Now here's a question you must ask.
00:04:05.920 Do I coincidentally keep guessing right,
00:04:08.860 or am I causing things to happen?
00:04:12.320 What do you think?
00:04:15.320 Because that was a pretty weird guess, wasn't it?
00:04:18.640 Do you think anybody could have guessed that in two years,
00:04:21.460 I don't know, 50 years of direct line progress would reverse?
00:04:28.360 That was a pretty gutsy call, wouldn't you say?
00:04:32.340 Some people think I caused it.
00:04:35.040 Some people say it just happened.
00:04:36.960 I mean, probably the pandemic would have happened either way, right?
00:04:39.980 So maybe it was just the pandemic.
00:04:42.140 It had nothing to do with me.
00:04:43.800 But isn't that the weirdest guess, though?
00:04:46.200 Does it seem weird to you that even if I had nothing to do with it,
00:04:51.620 which is a reasonable assumption,
00:04:53.240 it's reasonable to assume I had nothing to do with it, right?
00:04:56.560 So for those of you who are looking to check my ego,
00:05:01.000 let me say as clearly as possible,
00:05:02.760 I don't see any evidence that I had anything to do with it.
00:05:08.580 But what a weird prediction it would be, right?
00:05:11.560 That's a weird one.
00:05:13.100 And it's true.
00:05:14.060 It came true.
00:05:14.560 All right.
00:05:17.060 How many of you remember that when Trump first announced
00:05:23.060 that they were going to do the big push for vaccinations,
00:05:26.480 how many remember that I predicted that the vaccinations would not work?
00:05:32.000 How many remember that?
00:05:34.660 Do you remember that?
00:05:38.660 And do you remember the reason I predicted it?
00:05:41.220 It was because all the people who were knowledgeable about the field said,
00:05:45.940 we've been trying to do this for decades.
00:05:47.760 Why do you think you're going to do it in a year?
00:05:49.880 And they were all right.
00:05:52.100 They were all right.
00:05:53.700 Because that sounded like a pretty good reason to me.
00:05:56.560 Well, you've been trying for decades.
00:05:58.260 Wouldn't that be a weird coincidence if this is exactly the time you got it right?
00:06:03.040 Right?
00:06:03.660 Didn't that seem like a weird coincidence?
00:06:05.260 We've been trying for decades, but exactly when we need it, that's when we figured it out.
00:06:12.440 Because that's not really the, you know, the Adam's Law of slow-moving disasters.
00:06:15.840 This was a fast disaster.
00:06:17.680 This disaster snuck up on us, sort of.
00:06:20.120 I mean, Bill Gates warned us.
00:06:22.280 But, I don't know.
00:06:25.080 Now, I have to admit that when the data came out,
00:06:31.060 and it all seemed to indicate that it was preventing people from getting the infection,
00:06:35.720 I actually believed that.
00:06:38.500 I actually believed it.
00:06:40.380 Do you know who didn't believe it?
00:06:42.040 Who did not believe the official stand of the administration and all of our scientists?
00:06:51.360 Not just our scientists in the United States.
00:06:54.280 And this is very instructive.
00:06:56.440 Not just our scientists in the United States.
00:06:59.460 But pretty much, I think, all the scientists in all the industrial countries
00:07:03.620 told us that vaccinations would prevent you from getting reinfected.
00:07:08.800 It turns out that Dr. Birx knew that wasn't true.
00:07:13.960 All along.
00:07:15.600 Because she said they knew that people were getting reinfected
00:07:18.680 even when they had natural immunity.
00:07:21.440 And she said, since the vaccination mimics natural immunity,
00:07:25.580 why would we think that the vaccination would do better than the natural immunity?
00:07:29.940 To which I say, you fucking cunt.
00:07:33.640 You didn't tell us that?
00:07:35.440 You fucking cunt.
00:07:37.000 I'm sorry.
00:07:38.760 You can demonetize the piss out of me here on YouTube.
00:07:43.360 We don't have to take that.
00:07:46.020 You goddamn fucking cunt.
00:07:49.420 You knew that?
00:07:51.220 And you didn't say that?
00:07:52.640 What kind of a public health professional are you?
00:07:56.820 You piece of shit.
00:07:59.080 You fuck the country like we've never been fucked.
00:08:03.260 You ridiculous piece of shit.
00:08:05.020 Do you know what else Dr. Birx believed was true?
00:08:09.620 The drinking bleach hoax.
00:08:13.140 She actually said she believed that.
00:08:15.440 She was on the stage when it didn't happen.
00:08:19.580 She was present when the hoax literally didn't happen
00:08:24.200 and still believed it happened.
00:08:27.500 What a fucking idiot was in charge of our operation.
00:08:32.280 Now, her own book admits that she fudged the data
00:08:35.200 because they didn't have good data
00:08:36.280 and that they literally lied to the government
00:08:39.420 and the administration
00:08:42.000 and lied to the public
00:08:43.820 and said that they did it for her own good.
00:08:47.900 Maybe.
00:08:49.300 Maybe.
00:08:50.020 I don't have any reason to believe
00:08:51.420 that she didn't think it was for her own good.
00:08:55.040 But I don't know that that forgives it.
00:08:57.380 Do you?
00:08:58.020 I don't know that that forgives it.
00:09:00.560 This is a serious crime against the republic,
00:09:03.320 not necessarily legally.
00:09:04.840 I don't know about that.
00:09:05.680 But in terms of an offense against the republic,
00:09:09.540 I don't know if we've seen a bigger one.
00:09:11.820 I don't think there's any crime involved.
00:09:14.640 I think it's incompetence and bad judgment,
00:09:17.640 along with bad will, I think.
00:09:21.020 I mean, but that part would be speculation.
00:09:25.340 Now, to be fair,
00:09:29.920 Trump let this piece of shit work for him,
00:09:34.120 and that's on him.
00:09:35.680 Will you accept that?
00:09:39.560 Trump let her work there.
00:09:41.960 That's on him.
00:09:43.480 There's no way to shade that.
00:09:46.340 That's fucking on him.
00:09:48.220 All right?
00:09:49.860 So now we know that.
00:09:51.600 And we're coming close to finding out
00:09:54.320 that every bad, let's say,
00:09:58.820 worry that you had about what was really happening,
00:10:02.160 they were pretty close to what actually was happening.
00:10:04.460 Your worst suspicions were pretty close.
00:10:10.320 Amazing.
00:10:11.720 Amazing.
00:10:12.760 And you have to be a real piece of shit
00:10:14.900 to be in the middle of this
00:10:17.180 and then write a fucking book about it
00:10:18.860 and brag about it.
00:10:19.740 Am I banned from YouTube yet?
00:10:27.280 I'm trying to normalize that C word.
00:10:30.600 I think I can do it.
00:10:32.260 Well, let me ask you this.
00:10:33.780 Will I be accused of racism because I...
00:10:35.700 or not racism, sexism, because I used that word?
00:10:39.300 I would like to protect myself
00:10:41.120 from charges of sexism
00:10:44.200 for using that word about Dr. Birx.
00:10:48.140 And I'd like to tell you that Dr. Fauci,
00:10:53.360 he's a dick.
00:10:55.100 He's a dick.
00:10:57.160 So we have parity.
00:11:00.560 Right?
00:11:00.880 Fauci's a dick.
00:11:03.060 Birx is that other word.
00:11:06.860 We're equal, right?
00:11:08.200 Does anybody have a problem with that?
00:11:10.120 In the comments, do you have a problem with that?
00:11:11.780 Do you have a problem if I treat the genders equally?
00:11:16.780 Right?
00:11:17.640 No problem.
00:11:19.060 Okay.
00:11:19.780 We're both on the same page.
00:11:23.380 Good.
00:11:24.860 I don't know.
00:11:25.300 This is pretty offensive, this story.
00:11:27.280 And if I happen to be offensive in return,
00:11:31.400 it has as much to do with the way
00:11:33.260 she's dealing with it after the fact
00:11:34.920 as it does that what she did was unconscionable,
00:11:38.840 completely immoral and unethical
00:11:41.920 to the deepest level, in my opinion.
00:11:45.100 Now, it's also true,
00:11:46.480 this is where it gets complicated,
00:11:48.320 it's also true it might have been
00:11:49.980 the best thing for the country.
00:11:53.080 And I'm going to say that directly.
00:11:55.640 I feel like lying to the country,
00:11:58.920 maybe you should have left it to us.
00:12:01.620 Hold on.
00:12:02.700 Hold on.
00:12:03.260 Now, what she's accused of doing,
00:12:04.640 among other things,
00:12:06.560 is skewing the data,
00:12:08.040 but also lying about their intentions
00:12:10.600 for a two-week shutdown.
00:12:12.780 So she actually admits
00:12:14.080 that she never thought two weeks would be enough
00:12:16.140 and that it was a starting bid
00:12:18.220 to get the public a little bit pregnant
00:12:20.980 because if we bought off in the two weeks,
00:12:23.680 then maybe it was easier to extend it
00:12:25.440 than to start off with,
00:12:27.200 we're going to close things for six months.
00:12:29.360 Now, if she believed
00:12:31.800 that closing things for some longer period
00:12:34.540 than two weeks was essential
00:12:36.440 for our survival,
00:12:38.500 or was important anyway,
00:12:40.580 and she believed that was the only way
00:12:42.460 to get it done,
00:12:45.500 that has to be considered.
00:12:47.720 That has to be considered.
00:12:49.580 Because sometimes our public leaders
00:12:51.820 are asked to do things
00:12:53.000 that we're glad we don't have to do.
00:12:55.300 Sometimes they have to do some ugly things
00:12:58.640 and maybe they're going to take the hit for that
00:13:00.280 if they do it right.
00:13:01.660 So I'm not going to rule out,
00:13:03.600 I will not rule out,
00:13:05.120 that her intentions were correct.
00:13:08.100 Will you go that far with me?
00:13:10.020 There's no evidence
00:13:10.840 that she was working for China.
00:13:13.300 There's no evidence
00:13:14.040 that she was working for Russia.
00:13:15.860 There's no evidence
00:13:16.540 that she hates America.
00:13:18.400 If she made a mistake,
00:13:19.540 it was probably well-intentioned.
00:13:21.760 Can you give me that?
00:13:22.560 Will we be generous enough
00:13:27.060 to give her that?
00:13:28.360 I think so.
00:13:29.520 There's no evidence
00:13:30.240 that she didn't have
00:13:30.880 what's the best interest in the country.
00:13:33.200 But here's the thing.
00:13:34.880 If you have my best interest in mind
00:13:36.920 and you lie to me,
00:13:38.680 and you take my right
00:13:40.180 to make a decision away by that lie,
00:13:42.960 I'm not going to forgive you
00:13:44.520 because it was in my best interest.
00:13:47.080 Can we agree on that?
00:13:49.060 Even if it wasn't my best interest,
00:13:50.960 even if you had good intentions,
00:13:52.040 I'm not going to forgive it.
00:13:53.880 You took from me
00:13:54.980 my right to decide.
00:13:57.280 You took from me
00:13:58.400 my right to decide.
00:14:00.780 Not cool.
00:14:02.340 Not cool,
00:14:03.080 even if you did it
00:14:03.760 for my own good.
00:14:04.960 That's not how it works.
00:14:08.600 All right.
00:14:09.180 All right.
00:14:11.800 How about my prediction
00:14:13.260 that I got widely mocked for
00:14:14.880 that Republicans would be hunted
00:14:16.480 if Biden got elected?
00:14:20.000 How's that prediction?
00:14:21.000 Weirdest prediction, right?
00:14:22.860 The Republicans would be hunted?
00:14:25.940 And, you know,
00:14:26.900 it's anecdotal,
00:14:28.020 but it's starting to add up.
00:14:29.540 There's yet another story
00:14:30.620 in the New York Post
00:14:31.400 about some,
00:14:33.640 I guess,
00:14:34.100 some women
00:14:34.540 who were on
00:14:35.020 public transit
00:14:36.800 and found out
00:14:37.940 and found out
00:14:37.960 that somebody
00:14:38.420 was a Trump supporter
00:14:39.380 and just attacked her.
00:14:41.060 Now, maybe they would have
00:14:42.000 attacked her anyway,
00:14:42.860 but the story reports
00:14:43.940 that the Trump supporter
00:14:45.620 part of it
00:14:46.080 was an important part
00:14:46.940 of the story.
00:14:48.420 Now,
00:14:49.500 have you ever heard
00:14:50.340 of anybody being punched
00:14:51.580 or attacked
00:14:52.400 for being a Biden supporter?
00:14:55.020 Ever?
00:14:55.540 No.
00:14:57.700 It's not even a thing.
00:14:59.500 Zero times
00:15:00.400 that's happened.
00:15:00.980 Have you ever seen
00:15:02.620 any examples
00:15:03.260 of Republicans
00:15:04.080 who were treated
00:15:04.980 poorly by the public
00:15:06.180 for simply being
00:15:07.700 a Trump supporter?
00:15:09.680 Yes, you have.
00:15:10.600 A lot of them.
00:15:12.120 And even,
00:15:12.620 I would argue
00:15:13.160 that even the January 6th thing
00:15:14.700 is just an ordinary,
00:15:17.520 it's basically,
00:15:18.940 it's basically
00:15:21.580 an organized hunt,
00:15:23.580 isn't it?
00:15:24.960 So,
00:15:25.760 of my weirdest predictions
00:15:27.440 that Republicans
00:15:28.160 would be hunted,
00:15:29.420 there's evidence
00:15:30.080 that that's true.
00:15:31.480 China would be
00:15:32.320 too risky for business,
00:15:33.920 evidence that that's true.
00:15:35.620 The vaccinations
00:15:36.340 wouldn't work,
00:15:37.260 at least as a vaccination.
00:15:38.760 They did seem to work
00:15:39.600 as reducing illness.
00:15:43.240 I got that right, too.
00:15:45.960 You have to admit
00:15:46.860 that I made some weird,
00:15:48.480 weird predictions
00:15:49.240 that came in,
00:15:50.220 including that
00:15:50.940 Trump would be elected.
00:15:52.880 The weirdest one
00:15:53.540 I got wrong
00:15:54.400 was that Kamala Harris
00:15:55.640 would be the biggest
00:15:56.840 competitor to Trump.
00:15:58.840 She did make it
00:15:59.620 to president,
00:16:00.600 which is the weirdest
00:16:01.400 wrong prediction ever.
00:16:04.500 All right.
00:16:08.800 I can't believe
00:16:09.840 that Dr. Brooks
00:16:10.640 believed the fine people,
00:16:12.400 or the drinking bleach hoax.
00:16:14.580 Wouldn't you like
00:16:15.200 to see Republicans
00:16:16.240 have to take the hoax test
00:16:18.120 to be in government?
00:16:21.100 I mean,
00:16:21.500 actually, literally,
00:16:23.540 if somebody is running
00:16:24.740 for office,
00:16:26.080 they need to take
00:16:27.300 the hoax test.
00:16:28.680 Because do you want
00:16:29.580 somebody else
00:16:30.360 on a Republican administration
00:16:31.780 who believes
00:16:32.760 one of the hoaxes?
00:16:34.440 Do you want
00:16:35.120 that person in office?
00:16:36.440 Anybody who believed
00:16:37.480 one of those hoaxes,
00:16:38.920 especially if they're
00:16:39.800 a Republican,
00:16:42.060 you've got to worry.
00:16:43.940 You'd have to worry
00:16:44.740 about their judgment.
00:16:45.420 So here's another,
00:16:50.160 oh,
00:16:51.220 here's a suggestion
00:16:53.640 by Twitter user
00:16:55.020 Angela.
00:16:56.880 Angela,
00:16:57.500 if you're watching.
00:16:59.720 Angela suggested
00:17:00.680 by Twitter
00:17:01.240 that we have a name
00:17:02.760 for the people
00:17:03.320 who believe
00:17:03.780 in all the hoaxes.
00:17:05.880 Koi boys.
00:17:08.280 Now,
00:17:08.560 one of the hoaxes
00:17:09.460 was that Trump
00:17:10.140 overfed the koi
00:17:11.460 in Japan.
00:17:12.800 And correct me
00:17:13.880 if I'm wrong,
00:17:14.620 koi fish is redundant?
00:17:16.820 Is that right?
00:17:18.700 Because you wouldn't
00:17:19.520 say trout fish.
00:17:21.560 You'd just say trout.
00:17:23.340 So koi fish
00:17:24.460 is redundant, yeah.
00:17:25.440 So just the koi.
00:17:26.780 Now,
00:17:27.260 that was the fake news.
00:17:28.900 Trump did not
00:17:29.800 overfeed the koi.
00:17:31.500 But what do you think?
00:17:33.000 Koi boys?
00:17:34.800 Yeah,
00:17:35.100 the koi boys.
00:17:36.300 The trouble is
00:17:37.060 the Democrats
00:17:37.540 wouldn't understand
00:17:38.320 the joke.
00:17:38.980 You know why?
00:17:40.600 Because they don't know
00:17:41.840 it's fake news
00:17:42.480 that they overfed
00:17:43.220 the koi.
00:17:45.520 I tested that
00:17:46.560 with my Democrat friend.
00:17:48.920 I said,
00:17:49.520 have you heard
00:17:49.940 of the koi story?
00:17:51.600 He had not.
00:17:52.520 He had never heard
00:17:53.180 of the koi story.
00:17:55.860 Okay.
00:17:59.640 Harry Enten
00:18:00.520 on CNN
00:18:01.280 who's becoming
00:18:02.100 an interesting
00:18:02.700 opinion person
00:18:04.360 because he's
00:18:06.420 interesting
00:18:06.820 because he's
00:18:07.440 on CNN
00:18:08.140 but is saying
00:18:09.780 things that are
00:18:10.520 objectively true
00:18:11.640 that are not
00:18:13.500 necessarily good
00:18:14.500 for Democrats.
00:18:16.660 And so I'm kind
00:18:17.240 of keeping my eye
00:18:18.100 on him.
00:18:19.200 It seems like
00:18:19.920 he's been freed
00:18:20.920 to speak
00:18:22.200 his actual opinion.
00:18:24.640 You know,
00:18:25.080 it looks like
00:18:25.460 management is
00:18:26.100 allowing him
00:18:26.700 to say
00:18:27.140 what he thinks
00:18:28.580 is true
00:18:29.060 as opposed to
00:18:30.500 it's got to be
00:18:31.260 anti-Trump.
00:18:32.800 And so today
00:18:33.600 he did an opinion
00:18:34.220 piece in which
00:18:34.780 he was talking
00:18:35.240 about some facts.
00:18:36.740 The polls
00:18:37.420 showing that
00:18:38.440 the GOP,
00:18:40.280 the Republicans
00:18:41.040 are picking up
00:18:41.780 support from
00:18:42.380 blacks,
00:18:42.920 Hispanics,
00:18:43.980 Asian,
00:18:44.520 and women.
00:18:48.020 They've already
00:18:48.740 got everybody else.
00:18:51.740 That's right.
00:18:52.660 The Republicans
00:18:53.220 are picking up
00:18:54.000 support from
00:18:54.740 the black community,
00:18:56.580 Hispanics,
00:18:57.260 Asian,
00:18:57.720 and women.
00:18:58.640 And I'm thinking,
00:19:00.240 well,
00:19:00.440 who are we
00:19:00.760 leaving out?
00:19:01.380 Probably everybody
00:19:03.700 else is going
00:19:04.300 that way too.
00:19:05.200 It's basically
00:19:05.640 everybody.
00:19:06.980 Now,
00:19:07.580 how many of you
00:19:09.780 scoffed
00:19:11.060 when I told you
00:19:12.220 that Republicans
00:19:12.900 were going to be,
00:19:14.300 you know,
00:19:14.680 people would
00:19:15.660 eventually figure out
00:19:16.740 that they were
00:19:18.180 Republicans,
00:19:18.900 they just didn't
00:19:19.380 know it?
00:19:19.920 Sort of the
00:19:20.380 Ronald Reagan
00:19:20.920 thing.
00:19:22.060 I mean,
00:19:22.280 I probably told you
00:19:23.280 four or five
00:19:24.120 years ago
00:19:24.680 that the black
00:19:26.500 voters in this
00:19:27.280 country would
00:19:27.820 start to move
00:19:28.400 Republican,
00:19:29.060 and everybody
00:19:29.420 laughed at me.
00:19:30.080 And it's
00:19:31.440 happening.
00:19:32.780 Black voters
00:19:33.540 are moving
00:19:34.020 Republicans,
00:19:35.060 for obvious
00:19:35.620 reasons,
00:19:36.120 you know,
00:19:36.500 economics,
00:19:37.360 blah,
00:19:37.500 blah,
00:19:37.620 blah.
00:19:39.480 Oh,
00:19:39.780 there's a
00:19:41.400 good thank
00:19:42.580 you for that
00:19:42.980 correction.
00:19:43.540 Somebody made
00:19:44.040 a correction.
00:19:45.540 I should have
00:19:46.160 said they're
00:19:46.660 starting to
00:19:47.520 move conservative,
00:19:48.920 which might
00:19:49.640 include supporting
00:19:50.720 some Republican
00:19:51.420 stuff,
00:19:52.940 and people.
00:19:55.120 So I wouldn't
00:19:55.920 say they're
00:19:56.260 moving Republicans
00:19:57.200 so much as
00:19:58.120 they're moving
00:19:58.580 in that direction.
00:20:00.080 here's
00:20:02.060 something else
00:20:02.520 that Harry
00:20:02.920 Enten said,
00:20:04.160 that when
00:20:04.480 people were
00:20:04.940 asked about,
00:20:08.000 oh,
00:20:08.320 not only are
00:20:10.060 those populations
00:20:10.820 moving toward
00:20:12.400 Republicans,
00:20:13.280 but at the
00:20:14.140 best rate
00:20:14.940 either ever
00:20:17.000 or for decades.
00:20:18.780 So we're
00:20:19.140 talking about
00:20:19.660 like an
00:20:20.000 all-time best
00:20:20.960 for Republicans
00:20:21.820 picking up
00:20:22.840 black support.
00:20:23.520 Is that weird?
00:20:25.940 Imagine what it
00:20:26.660 would be if the
00:20:27.400 entire press
00:20:28.240 were not
00:20:29.180 making hoaxes
00:20:30.880 about racism.
00:20:33.720 Wouldn't the
00:20:34.520 Republicans just
00:20:35.360 completely be
00:20:36.860 competitive?
00:20:37.780 It would be
00:20:38.100 closer to 50-50,
00:20:39.340 wouldn't it?
00:20:40.300 Because if you
00:20:41.220 would actually
00:20:41.580 look at the
00:20:42.460 views of
00:20:43.880 black Americans,
00:20:45.560 wouldn't it be
00:20:46.140 closer to 50-50
00:20:47.720 conservative
00:20:49.100 versus liberal?
00:20:50.940 On some issues,
00:20:52.160 it's probably
00:20:52.540 completely liberal,
00:20:53.480 but overall,
00:20:55.140 don't you think
00:20:55.640 you'd be closer
00:20:56.080 to 50-50?
00:20:57.000 That's just sort
00:20:57.800 of a general
00:20:59.200 impression.
00:20:59.920 I don't know
00:21:00.220 that that's
00:21:00.600 backed by any
00:21:01.160 data.
00:21:03.500 So I think
00:21:04.200 we'll move
00:21:04.560 toward that
00:21:05.000 despite the
00:21:06.600 brainwashing.
00:21:08.160 So according
00:21:08.700 to also Harry
00:21:09.820 Enten was
00:21:10.300 saying on
00:21:10.820 the CNN
00:21:11.500 piece,
00:21:12.700 that when
00:21:13.580 asked what
00:21:14.120 the top
00:21:14.500 issue in
00:21:14.840 the country
00:21:15.160 is,
00:21:15.540 fewer than
00:21:16.080 1% of
00:21:17.020 respondents
00:21:17.480 said coronavirus.
00:21:18.440 So the
00:21:20.980 government
00:21:21.360 may be
00:21:22.020 looking to
00:21:22.580 remask us
00:21:23.940 and put
00:21:25.020 restrictions
00:21:25.580 back on,
00:21:26.700 and the
00:21:27.360 public is
00:21:27.920 so done.
00:21:30.220 So done.
00:21:31.760 When my
00:21:32.760 county was
00:21:34.060 sort of the
00:21:34.480 last one,
00:21:35.140 I think,
00:21:35.440 in the country
00:21:35.940 or near the
00:21:36.500 last to
00:21:37.400 reinstitute
00:21:38.140 masks toward
00:21:39.400 the end of
00:21:40.240 that last
00:21:40.680 cycle in
00:21:41.120 the spring,
00:21:42.320 the mask
00:21:43.080 compliance in
00:21:44.980 stores was
00:21:46.660 just practically
00:21:47.660 ridiculous.
00:21:49.800 There were
00:21:50.380 no store
00:21:51.100 owners who
00:21:52.480 were enforcing
00:21:53.100 a period.
00:21:54.420 The store
00:21:55.100 owners were
00:21:55.800 just done.
00:21:56.900 And when
00:21:57.140 the store
00:21:57.480 owners are
00:21:57.960 done,
00:21:58.800 the public's
00:21:59.360 done.
00:22:00.540 Now, of
00:22:01.260 course, in
00:22:01.560 medical facilities
00:22:02.420 and stuff,
00:22:02.940 people still
00:22:03.380 masked up,
00:22:04.100 but I think
00:22:04.440 they're still
00:22:04.740 doing that
00:22:05.100 now.
00:22:06.560 Personally,
00:22:08.340 has anybody
00:22:08.780 else had this
00:22:09.340 experience?
00:22:10.040 Even if,
00:22:10.400 no matter how
00:22:11.020 anti-mask you
00:22:12.120 are, if you
00:22:13.400 go into a
00:22:13.920 medical facility,
00:22:15.680 you just go,
00:22:16.460 oh, hell,
00:22:17.040 you put on
00:22:17.460 your mask.
00:22:19.080 Anybody have
00:22:19.680 that same
00:22:20.060 experience?
00:22:21.080 If I go to
00:22:21.680 the grocery
00:22:22.100 store, I
00:22:22.660 might be a
00:22:23.100 rebel.
00:22:24.320 But if I go
00:22:25.220 to my doctor,
00:22:27.060 I'm going to
00:22:27.880 put on the
00:22:28.260 mask.
00:22:28.780 Now, why is
00:22:29.260 that?
00:22:30.580 I guess it's
00:22:31.220 because I want
00:22:31.800 my health care.
00:22:32.460 I don't want
00:22:32.760 to get in a
00:22:33.180 fight, right?
00:22:33.900 I just don't
00:22:34.640 want to pick
00:22:35.040 a fight.
00:22:36.220 But I, you
00:22:37.280 know, I
00:22:37.760 convince myself
00:22:38.740 it's because
00:22:39.300 they're, you
00:22:40.300 know,
00:22:40.560 immunocompromised
00:22:42.060 people are in
00:22:42.860 greater concentration
00:22:44.520 or something,
00:22:45.480 but dentists
00:22:46.900 too, yeah.
00:22:47.780 Well, I guess
00:22:48.740 you've got to
00:22:49.040 take it off
00:22:49.460 the dentist
00:22:49.960 eventually.
00:22:51.720 But,
00:22:52.080 interesting.
00:22:54.700 Yeah, I
00:22:55.120 mean, psychologically
00:22:55.960 I bend to
00:22:56.980 that one when I
00:22:57.680 don't bend to
00:22:58.280 other things as
00:22:58.900 easily.
00:22:59.360 I'm not sure
00:22:59.760 why.
00:23:00.580 Somebody says
00:23:01.100 it's respect.
00:23:02.460 Okay, I think
00:23:03.200 that's what it
00:23:03.620 is.
00:23:03.900 That's exactly
00:23:04.440 what it is.
00:23:05.160 I think that
00:23:05.720 is just respect
00:23:06.500 for the medical
00:23:07.160 profession.
00:23:08.760 I think you'd
00:23:09.480 nailed it.
00:23:10.340 Because I
00:23:10.720 knew there
00:23:11.200 was something
00:23:11.880 that was
00:23:13.840 biasing me
00:23:14.620 toward forgetting
00:23:15.900 the science and
00:23:16.660 just doing what
00:23:17.220 they said in
00:23:17.900 that case.
00:23:18.940 And I think
00:23:19.300 that's what it
00:23:19.740 is.
00:23:19.900 I think it's
00:23:20.160 just respect
00:23:20.680 for the
00:23:21.020 medical community.
00:23:23.080 I'm going to
00:23:23.580 go with that.
00:23:25.140 Anybody else
00:23:25.760 feel that?
00:23:26.360 That that's the
00:23:26.840 only reason you
00:23:27.340 do it?
00:23:27.640 It's like,
00:23:27.940 okay, I
00:23:28.280 respect these
00:23:28.880 people.
00:23:29.680 They're working
00:23:30.160 hard.
00:23:30.600 They sacrificed
00:23:31.280 all the way
00:23:31.680 through the
00:23:31.960 pandemic.
00:23:32.860 If they want
00:23:33.480 me to put a
00:23:33.900 mask on,
00:23:35.160 put a fucking
00:23:35.740 mask on.
00:23:36.760 Just because
00:23:37.300 they want it.
00:23:38.140 Right?
00:23:38.700 So that would
00:23:39.320 be an example
00:23:39.860 of just
00:23:40.540 because they
00:23:41.120 want it,
00:23:42.380 I'm in.
00:23:43.640 Because they've
00:23:44.160 earned it,
00:23:44.540 right?
00:23:45.180 There's nobody
00:23:45.880 who worked
00:23:46.320 harder than
00:23:47.740 the medical
00:23:48.360 community.
00:23:49.880 So if they
00:23:50.400 ask me to
00:23:50.820 put one on,
00:23:51.400 okay.
00:23:52.580 Because they've
00:23:52.980 earned it.
00:23:58.220 CNN is
00:23:58.960 slandering Ted
00:23:59.740 Cruz today,
00:24:00.720 in my opinion.
00:24:02.300 So is
00:24:03.060 slander,
00:24:03.720 in my opinion,
00:24:04.380 when your
00:24:04.720 headline suggests
00:24:05.740 something that's
00:24:06.560 not in the
00:24:07.040 body of the
00:24:07.620 article?
00:24:08.100 Would you
00:24:08.480 go that far?
00:24:09.060 If the
00:24:10.180 headline is
00:24:10.720 obviously not
00:24:11.660 matching the
00:24:12.180 article,
00:24:12.620 and the
00:24:12.820 headline is
00:24:13.280 making you
00:24:13.700 think something
00:24:14.380 bad happened,
00:24:15.520 and then you
00:24:15.900 read the
00:24:16.200 article,
00:24:16.560 oh,
00:24:16.800 that's not
00:24:17.140 bad.
00:24:18.140 That's slander,
00:24:18.920 isn't it?
00:24:19.940 So here's the
00:24:22.080 headline on
00:24:22.840 CNN.
00:24:23.940 And it's an
00:24:24.640 opinion piece,
00:24:25.320 so it says
00:24:25.720 opinion,
00:24:26.800 colon.
00:24:27.900 So I wonder
00:24:29.560 if this is a
00:24:30.160 change.
00:24:31.240 It's interesting
00:24:31.840 that the CNN
00:24:32.900 labeled it an
00:24:34.060 opinion.
00:24:35.240 They labeled it
00:24:36.060 an opinion.
00:24:36.620 Interesting.
00:24:37.740 You know,
00:24:37.960 like really
00:24:39.120 boldly
00:24:39.840 opinion.
00:24:41.300 Maybe they
00:24:42.240 know that
00:24:42.700 this is not
00:24:44.060 quite, you
00:24:45.620 know, not
00:24:45.960 quite on the
00:24:46.580 level here.
00:24:48.020 So this is
00:24:48.800 Dean Obadiah.
00:24:50.620 He often
00:24:51.020 does some of
00:24:51.620 the anti-Trump
00:24:52.620 stuff.
00:24:53.840 And he says
00:24:54.460 that Ted
00:24:55.240 Cruz's stance,
00:24:56.120 this is just
00:24:56.800 the headline,
00:24:58.180 Ted Cruz's
00:24:58.900 stance on
00:24:59.520 same-sex
00:25:00.180 marriage raises
00:25:01.500 a huge red
00:25:02.480 flag.
00:25:04.260 Now, what
00:25:04.620 would you
00:25:04.960 think Ted
00:25:05.600 Cruz's opinion
00:25:06.480 on same-sex
00:25:07.580 marriages is if
00:25:09.360 it, quote,
00:25:10.220 raises a huge
00:25:11.520 red flag?
00:25:13.000 What would be
00:25:13.700 the way a
00:25:14.280 Democrat would
00:25:15.100 interpret that?
00:25:16.800 How would a
00:25:17.520 Democrat interpret
00:25:18.840 that Ted Cruz's
00:25:20.860 stance, it's
00:25:22.140 unmentioned what
00:25:22.860 his stance is,
00:25:24.060 but his stance
00:25:25.020 on same-sex
00:25:25.840 marriage raises a
00:25:27.360 huge red flag?
00:25:29.240 You would
00:25:29.780 assume he
00:25:31.480 against it,
00:25:32.740 same-sex
00:25:33.400 marriage.
00:25:36.040 What does
00:25:36.660 the article
00:25:37.080 say?
00:25:38.880 The article
00:25:39.580 doesn't say
00:25:40.060 anything whether
00:25:40.740 he's against
00:25:41.220 it or for
00:25:41.620 it.
00:25:42.720 It says that
00:25:43.460 he thinks the
00:25:43.980 proper place to
00:25:44.760 have that decided
00:25:45.420 is in the
00:25:45.980 States, maybe.
00:25:47.140 I think he
00:25:47.840 firmly says it
00:25:48.620 should be in
00:25:48.960 the States.
00:25:50.380 Now, saying
00:25:51.460 that something
00:25:51.860 should be decided
00:25:52.680 by the States,
00:25:54.120 does that match
00:25:54.820 this headline?
00:25:55.980 Ted Cruz's
00:25:56.680 stance on
00:25:57.260 same-sex
00:25:57.800 marriage raises
00:25:58.600 a huge red
00:25:59.420 flag?
00:26:00.360 Well,
00:26:00.720 technically,
00:26:02.180 yes.
00:26:03.680 Technically,
00:26:04.280 all they're
00:26:04.580 saying is it
00:26:05.160 raises a huge
00:26:05.900 red flag,
00:26:07.000 and I think
00:26:07.740 you could say
00:26:08.200 that's true,
00:26:09.440 because it
00:26:09.800 tells you,
00:26:10.360 oh, watch
00:26:10.960 out, the
00:26:11.580 States could
00:26:12.100 change something
00:26:12.720 that you like.
00:26:13.640 Yeah, okay.
00:26:14.940 But don't you
00:26:15.960 think that it
00:26:16.580 also indicates
00:26:17.460 he's against
00:26:18.000 it?
00:26:18.960 And I don't
00:26:19.540 see that
00:26:20.020 evidence in
00:26:21.040 the story.
00:26:23.700 So to me,
00:26:24.480 this looks like
00:26:24.980 slander.
00:26:26.020 It looks to me
00:26:27.040 like they're
00:26:27.420 clearly trying to
00:26:28.300 indicate something
00:26:29.360 that's not
00:26:29.780 true.
00:26:31.540 All right.
00:26:34.500 I saw
00:26:35.260 Assange,
00:26:36.320 this is an
00:26:36.880 old quote
00:26:37.580 of his,
00:26:38.720 talking about
00:26:39.400 why we need
00:26:40.040 permanent wars,
00:26:41.360 and he was
00:26:41.840 talking about
00:26:42.280 Afghanistan.
00:26:43.580 As a war,
00:26:44.300 we didn't want
00:26:44.920 to win and
00:26:45.360 we didn't want
00:26:45.880 to lose,
00:26:46.320 we just wanted
00:26:46.840 to permanently
00:26:47.480 have a war.
00:26:48.580 He said the
00:26:49.120 reason is to
00:26:50.920 drain money out
00:26:52.000 of the tech
00:26:52.640 elite and put
00:26:55.480 it into more
00:26:56.100 of the military
00:26:57.240 industrial complex.
00:26:58.760 Have you ever
00:27:00.080 heard that
00:27:00.400 interpretation?
00:27:01.860 That the
00:27:02.560 technical elite,
00:27:04.340 you know,
00:27:04.500 the tech
00:27:05.020 company,
00:27:05.680 billionaires and
00:27:06.300 stuff,
00:27:06.960 that they were
00:27:07.400 getting too
00:27:07.800 much money and
00:27:08.460 therefore too
00:27:09.100 much power,
00:27:10.200 and that part
00:27:10.800 of the reasons
00:27:11.260 for a permanent
00:27:11.860 war is that
00:27:12.640 it allows you
00:27:13.040 to raise
00:27:13.660 taxes,
00:27:14.820 tax those
00:27:15.520 people,
00:27:16.500 run it through
00:27:16.980 the military
00:27:17.540 and make
00:27:18.420 profits for
00:27:19.180 the people
00:27:20.680 who are not
00:27:21.140 getting as
00:27:21.520 rich as the
00:27:22.060 tech people.
00:27:23.240 I don't know.
00:27:24.680 I feel like
00:27:25.300 that's an
00:27:25.720 over-interpretation
00:27:26.900 of what's
00:27:27.240 happening.
00:27:27.540 I think
00:27:28.640 the easier
00:27:29.940 interpretation is
00:27:30.820 everybody's doing
00:27:31.800 what looks like
00:27:32.420 their best
00:27:32.860 financial interest,
00:27:34.800 and this is the
00:27:35.420 way it comes out.
00:27:36.640 And the people
00:27:37.180 who sell weapons,
00:27:38.180 their best
00:27:38.520 financial interest
00:27:39.360 is to sell
00:27:40.080 more weapons,
00:27:40.880 so of course
00:27:41.440 they're pushing
00:27:43.120 for more wars
00:27:44.100 or permanent
00:27:44.560 wars.
00:27:45.180 I don't think
00:27:45.800 you have to
00:27:46.220 add that extra
00:27:47.000 incentive that
00:27:48.440 they want to
00:27:48.920 drain the money
00:27:50.060 from some
00:27:50.540 other group.
00:27:52.040 I mean,
00:27:52.360 that might be
00:27:52.840 what's happening,
00:27:54.280 but I feel
00:27:54.860 that's over-interpreting
00:27:56.140 it.
00:27:57.060 It's just
00:27:57.700 people trying
00:27:58.180 to make money
00:27:58.700 any way they
00:27:59.460 can,
00:28:00.000 I think.
00:28:03.920 So,
00:28:05.140 all right,
00:28:06.580 let's talk about
00:28:07.060 the January 6th
00:28:08.200 hopes.
00:28:10.040 This is how
00:28:10.980 CNN is
00:28:12.160 covering it.
00:28:12.760 Let me give
00:28:17.360 you just how
00:28:18.340 they do
00:28:18.620 the propaganda.
00:28:21.280 So,
00:28:21.760 the current
00:28:22.100 propaganda is
00:28:23.080 that there's
00:28:23.440 a whole bunch
00:28:23.880 of new
00:28:24.140 evidence.
00:28:25.720 So,
00:28:26.340 if you were
00:28:26.860 reading an
00:28:27.300 article on
00:28:27.740 CNN and
00:28:28.320 you didn't
00:28:28.640 have time,
00:28:29.740 you're just
00:28:30.020 skimming it,
00:28:31.120 and you saw
00:28:31.580 there was a
00:28:31.940 whole bunch
00:28:32.280 of new
00:28:32.620 evidence about
00:28:33.860 Trump planning
00:28:34.720 an insurrection,
00:28:37.500 what would you
00:28:38.400 assume?
00:28:39.700 Wouldn't you
00:28:40.260 assume that
00:28:40.760 there was
00:28:41.280 new evidence?
00:28:42.760 And then
00:28:44.860 you look for,
00:28:45.380 you read the
00:28:45.800 article looking
00:28:46.360 for the new
00:28:46.880 evidence.
00:28:49.160 And
00:28:49.520 some of
00:28:52.500 the new
00:28:52.780 evidence is
00:28:53.660 that when
00:28:54.080 Trump said
00:28:54.840 that he
00:28:56.700 didn't want
00:28:57.540 the metal
00:28:58.560 detectors to
00:28:59.460 be working
00:29:00.520 because he
00:29:02.720 didn't want
00:29:03.140 the crowd
00:29:03.720 to be limited,
00:29:04.720 he wanted
00:29:04.940 the crowd
00:29:05.360 to be able
00:29:05.740 to go
00:29:05.940 where the
00:29:06.200 crowd could
00:29:06.680 go to
00:29:07.020 protest,
00:29:08.140 and he
00:29:08.520 said that
00:29:09.960 they,
00:29:11.020 you know,
00:29:11.220 even if they
00:29:11.680 had weapons,
00:29:12.260 they're not
00:29:12.940 going to
00:29:13.180 hurt him.
00:29:14.700 Now,
00:29:15.220 how did
00:29:15.700 CNN interpret
00:29:17.320 Trump saying
00:29:18.620 he wants to
00:29:19.180 take down
00:29:19.620 the metal
00:29:19.940 detectors
00:29:20.420 because they're
00:29:21.620 not going
00:29:22.020 to hurt
00:29:22.380 him?
00:29:23.560 They
00:29:24.120 interpreted
00:29:24.620 that as
00:29:25.260 his secret
00:29:25.900 meaning,
00:29:27.100 his secret
00:29:27.680 mafia talk,
00:29:29.180 is let
00:29:29.860 him in,
00:29:30.720 they're going
00:29:31.060 to use
00:29:31.400 those guns
00:29:32.020 to conquer
00:29:33.540 the Capitol.
00:29:34.080 people.
00:29:36.640 Now,
00:29:37.280 let me tell
00:29:37.720 you,
00:29:38.100 everything
00:29:38.460 that CNN
00:29:39.140 has been
00:29:39.620 reporting
00:29:40.020 about Trump
00:29:41.080 from the
00:29:41.660 first day
00:29:42.200 he announced
00:29:42.860 was that
00:29:43.780 Trump only
00:29:44.440 cares about
00:29:45.180 what happens
00:29:45.780 to Trump.
00:29:46.720 Am I
00:29:47.060 right?
00:29:47.940 The single
00:29:48.720 most consistent
00:29:49.900 narrative of
00:29:51.640 Trump is that
00:29:52.300 he only cares
00:29:53.160 about what
00:29:53.620 happens to
00:29:54.160 him.
00:29:55.820 Do we all
00:29:56.540 accept that?
00:29:57.740 That he
00:29:58.040 doesn't care
00:29:58.500 about the
00:29:58.940 country,
00:29:59.920 doesn't care
00:30:00.400 about anything.
00:30:01.780 He only cares
00:30:02.400 about what
00:30:02.760 happens to
00:30:03.200 him.
00:30:04.080 We are
00:30:04.580 to believe
00:30:04.980 that that's
00:30:05.400 true,
00:30:05.760 right?
00:30:06.800 And then
00:30:07.320 when CNN
00:30:07.780 reports it
00:30:09.360 and says
00:30:09.980 that when
00:30:10.780 he was
00:30:11.060 talking about
00:30:11.620 the metal
00:30:11.960 detectors,
00:30:12.800 the only
00:30:13.420 thing he
00:30:13.840 cared about
00:30:14.280 the metal
00:30:14.640 detectors was
00:30:15.580 were they
00:30:16.580 there to
00:30:17.060 hurt him?
00:30:18.760 In other
00:30:19.180 words,
00:30:19.460 he personalized
00:30:20.100 the metal
00:30:20.680 detectors as
00:30:21.460 being about
00:30:22.060 him.
00:30:23.080 And then
00:30:23.580 he spoke
00:30:24.080 to it
00:30:24.560 about him.
00:30:26.260 The most
00:30:26.740 consistent
00:30:27.380 thing that
00:30:28.260 they have
00:30:28.620 told us
00:30:29.040 is the
00:30:29.360 way he
00:30:29.700 thinks.
00:30:30.600 And then
00:30:31.140 they decided
00:30:31.720 to conclude
00:30:32.460 that even
00:30:33.400 though they
00:30:33.740 have sold
00:30:34.060 us that
00:30:34.440 all he
00:30:35.040 cares about
00:30:35.520 is him,
00:30:36.540 that the
00:30:36.900 one time
00:30:37.400 he clearly
00:30:38.040 said,
00:30:38.920 this is
00:30:39.160 about me,
00:30:39.960 they're not
00:30:40.480 here to
00:30:40.780 hurt me,
00:30:41.700 the one
00:30:42.220 time he
00:30:42.580 explicitly
00:30:43.160 said,
00:30:43.720 this is
00:30:43.940 just about
00:30:44.480 me,
00:30:45.180 how did
00:30:45.660 they interpret
00:30:46.160 it?
00:30:47.200 It wasn't
00:30:48.000 about him.
00:30:49.400 It was
00:30:50.040 about attacking
00:30:50.720 the Capitol.
00:30:51.820 The one
00:30:52.480 time it
00:30:53.480 was absolutely
00:30:54.560 definitely
00:30:55.100 about him.
00:30:56.220 He said
00:30:57.000 it exactly
00:30:57.620 in those
00:30:58.080 words.
00:30:58.740 And they
00:30:59.160 interpreted it
00:30:59.960 as being
00:31:00.800 some other
00:31:01.320 thing.
00:31:02.300 Now,
00:31:02.540 do you
00:31:02.780 see the
00:31:03.400 pattern yet?
00:31:05.140 Scott
00:31:05.460 says,
00:31:10.560 MV here
00:31:12.120 says,
00:31:12.480 Scott is
00:31:12.880 being red
00:31:13.360 pilled after
00:31:13.980 a lifetime
00:31:14.440 on the
00:31:14.920 left.
00:31:16.840 Does that
00:31:17.500 sound right?
00:31:18.800 Does it
00:31:19.100 sound like
00:31:19.480 I'm just
00:31:19.860 now getting
00:31:20.340 red pilled
00:31:20.860 because of
00:31:22.300 my lifetime
00:31:22.820 on the
00:31:23.180 left?
00:31:23.960 You are
00:31:24.500 really not
00:31:25.160 paying attention,
00:31:25.980 MV.
00:31:26.220 you should
00:31:28.860 probably
00:31:29.160 never talk
00:31:29.980 in public
00:31:30.540 because you're
00:31:32.140 just embarrassing
00:31:32.760 yourself in front
00:31:33.500 of everybody
00:31:34.020 here.
00:31:35.100 That is
00:31:35.840 the most
00:31:36.340 ignorant
00:31:36.660 comment you
00:31:37.320 could possibly
00:31:37.900 say about
00:31:38.360 me.
00:31:39.040 It's like
00:31:39.340 you don't
00:31:39.540 know who
00:31:40.260 I am.
00:31:41.400 Did you
00:31:41.600 just come
00:31:43.500 here from
00:31:43.840 TikTok?
00:31:47.340 If you're
00:31:47.980 going to be
00:31:48.740 here, you
00:31:49.180 need to
00:31:49.500 elevate your
00:31:50.180 game a
00:31:50.560 little bit.
00:31:52.600 Don't just
00:31:53.260 imagine shit
00:31:54.120 and then
00:31:54.400 criticize it.
00:31:55.120 if you
00:31:57.540 want to
00:31:57.840 find a
00:31:58.220 way to
00:31:58.480 say you're
00:31:58.800 a Democrat
00:31:59.240 without being
00:31:59.780 a Democrat,
00:32:00.520 just say
00:32:01.080 it that
00:32:01.340 way.
00:32:02.100 I imagined
00:32:02.860 something and
00:32:03.800 in my
00:32:04.160 imagination it
00:32:05.060 was very
00:32:05.980 disturbing so
00:32:06.820 therefore you
00:32:07.440 should go to
00:32:07.920 jail because
00:32:09.040 of my
00:32:09.520 imagination.
00:32:10.920 I imagined
00:32:11.660 bad things so
00:32:12.480 maybe you
00:32:12.920 should all
00:32:13.180 go to
00:32:13.440 jail.
00:32:16.100 The way
00:32:17.320 that the
00:32:17.820 media
00:32:18.300 propagandists
00:32:19.100 play this
00:32:19.940 is Trump
00:32:20.860 will say
00:32:21.220 something.
00:32:21.820 I tweeted
00:32:22.540 this earlier.
00:32:23.600 Trump will
00:32:24.040 say the
00:32:24.420 sky is
00:32:24.940 blue.
00:32:26.400 And if
00:32:27.000 you're a
00:32:27.280 Trump supporter
00:32:27.880 you say
00:32:28.320 Trump says
00:32:30.280 the sky is
00:32:30.780 blue.
00:32:31.980 It looks
00:32:32.420 blue.
00:32:33.420 That tracks.
00:32:35.520 Most people
00:32:36.240 think it's
00:32:36.640 blue.
00:32:37.520 Trump probably
00:32:38.100 thinks it's
00:32:38.540 blue.
00:32:39.560 I don't know.
00:32:40.100 Obviously
00:32:40.540 that's exactly
00:32:41.600 what he
00:32:41.860 means.
00:32:42.440 Sky is
00:32:42.880 blue.
00:32:44.520 And then
00:32:45.180 CNN will
00:32:45.880 say when
00:32:46.380 Trump says
00:32:46.880 the sky is
00:32:47.360 blue what
00:32:47.780 he really
00:32:48.200 means is
00:32:48.760 that he
00:32:49.120 wants to
00:32:49.520 round up
00:32:49.940 all brown
00:32:50.360 people and
00:32:50.980 kill them.
00:32:52.300 and then
00:32:54.500 you say
00:32:54.960 that feels
00:32:56.620 like not
00:32:57.800 even close
00:32:58.300 to what
00:32:58.580 he said.
00:32:59.640 In fact
00:33:00.100 that is so
00:33:01.400 far from
00:33:01.900 what he
00:33:02.240 said that
00:33:03.340 I don't
00:33:03.620 even know
00:33:03.900 what's
00:33:04.080 happening
00:33:04.380 now.
00:33:06.440 But the
00:33:07.020 only people
00:33:07.480 who are
00:33:07.700 going to
00:33:07.940 notice that
00:33:09.100 he didn't
00:33:09.460 say that
00:33:10.000 are the
00:33:10.780 people who
00:33:11.220 follow the
00:33:11.740 news closely
00:33:12.480 especially when
00:33:13.720 they see
00:33:14.020 both sides.
00:33:14.600 what percentage
00:33:15.980 of the
00:33:16.340 country
00:33:16.640 follow the
00:33:17.280 news
00:33:17.520 closely?
00:33:19.500 5%?
00:33:20.620 What would
00:33:21.160 you say?
00:33:22.100 What percentage
00:33:22.820 of the
00:33:23.140 country
00:33:23.420 follow the
00:33:24.040 news
00:33:24.200 closely?
00:33:25.220 Meaning
00:33:25.520 they've at
00:33:25.960 least heard
00:33:26.480 both
00:33:26.760 arguments.
00:33:27.980 It's less
00:33:28.540 than 5.
00:33:29.920 It's like
00:33:30.480 3 tops.
00:33:32.720 So if
00:33:33.900 CNN gives
00:33:34.540 a headline
00:33:35.100 that says
00:33:35.680 Trump says
00:33:36.620 the sky is
00:33:37.840 blue but
00:33:38.300 what he
00:33:38.580 really means
00:33:39.200 is round
00:33:40.040 up and
00:33:40.400 kill all
00:33:40.780 the people
00:33:41.180 who are
00:33:41.660 brown.
00:33:42.620 what are
00:33:44.780 people who
00:33:45.280 are low
00:33:45.860 consumers of
00:33:47.040 news going
00:33:48.020 to say?
00:33:48.560 They're going
00:33:48.940 to believe
00:33:49.220 it.
00:33:49.400 It's on
00:33:49.660 CNN.
00:33:50.640 Oh it's
00:33:51.000 also on
00:33:51.440 MSNBC.
00:33:52.660 Oh it's
00:33:53.000 also on
00:33:53.400 NPR.
00:33:53.940 Oh it's
00:33:54.240 also on
00:33:54.580 ABC.
00:33:55.460 And they're
00:33:55.780 all saying
00:33:56.100 the same
00:33:56.440 thing.
00:33:57.120 That Trump
00:33:57.500 said something
00:33:58.060 horrible and
00:33:59.000 even if you
00:33:59.480 looked at his
00:33:59.900 actual words
00:34:00.540 all he said
00:34:00.920 was the sky
00:34:01.500 is blue.
00:34:02.300 But everybody's
00:34:03.240 reporting that he
00:34:03.900 literally said
00:34:04.480 different things.
00:34:05.700 Or that what
00:34:06.560 he meant in
00:34:07.080 his mind was
00:34:07.740 the worst
00:34:08.520 interpretation of
00:34:09.520 it.
00:34:09.680 Correct me
00:34:13.580 if I'm
00:34:13.840 wrong.
00:34:14.560 Is not the
00:34:15.140 most obvious
00:34:15.840 interpretation of
00:34:17.060 they won't
00:34:18.200 hurt me
00:34:18.980 isn't the
00:34:20.900 most obvious
00:34:21.500 interpretation
00:34:22.260 I'm worried
00:34:23.860 about myself
00:34:24.740 and even I
00:34:26.000 don't see a
00:34:26.580 problem because
00:34:27.220 Republicans are
00:34:28.020 not here to
00:34:28.580 shoot me.
00:34:30.340 Did any of
00:34:31.140 that indicate
00:34:31.720 he thought
00:34:32.180 they were
00:34:32.400 going to use
00:34:32.780 their weapons
00:34:33.280 on the
00:34:33.920 Capitol?
00:34:35.420 To me it
00:34:35.920 indicates that
00:34:36.500 he doesn't
00:34:36.940 think Republicans
00:34:37.760 bring out
00:34:38.320 weapons unless
00:34:39.060 they have
00:34:39.880 self-defense
00:34:40.420 purposes.
00:34:42.040 To me it
00:34:42.760 just sounds
00:34:43.100 like a
00:34:43.400 Republican
00:34:43.780 opinion.
00:34:45.100 Republicans
00:34:45.560 don't take
00:34:46.480 out their
00:34:46.840 gun unless
00:34:48.360 it's self-defense
00:34:49.080 and it
00:34:49.580 didn't look
00:34:49.940 like there
00:34:50.240 was any
00:34:50.540 self-defense
00:34:51.220 going on.
00:34:52.460 From Trump's
00:34:53.160 point of view
00:34:53.660 where was the
00:34:54.380 self-defense
00:34:54.920 requirement?
00:34:56.020 There was no
00:34:56.740 threat.
00:34:58.080 Why would
00:34:58.480 they take
00:34:58.840 out guns
00:34:59.300 when there
00:34:59.600 was no
00:34:59.840 purpose?
00:35:01.300 Isn't the
00:35:01.800 most obvious
00:35:02.560 Republican
00:35:03.200 opinion that
00:35:04.680 Republicans use
00:35:05.520 guns when
00:35:06.060 they have a
00:35:06.400 good reason,
00:35:07.000 a legal reason
00:35:07.680 and they
00:35:08.540 don't use
00:35:09.100 them when
00:35:09.380 they don't.
00:35:12.040 But Democrats
00:35:13.500 don't know
00:35:14.060 that so you
00:35:14.620 can just do
00:35:15.000 a headline
00:35:15.420 that suggests
00:35:16.080 the opposite
00:35:16.560 and that's
00:35:17.100 all they
00:35:17.320 see and
00:35:17.900 they're good.
00:35:19.740 Here's what
00:35:20.420 Democrats have
00:35:22.140 to believe at
00:35:22.860 this point to
00:35:23.720 keep their
00:35:24.100 illusion alive.
00:35:25.820 They have to
00:35:26.600 believe that
00:35:27.180 Trump, the
00:35:28.780 worst manager
00:35:29.800 who ever
00:35:30.360 lived in
00:35:31.340 their opinion,
00:35:32.580 so this is
00:35:33.620 for Democrats
00:35:34.140 to keep their
00:35:34.700 opinion consistent.
00:35:35.640 the worst
00:35:37.160 manager who
00:35:38.380 ever lived
00:35:38.960 who can't
00:35:40.260 keep his
00:35:40.700 mouth shut,
00:35:41.560 again, this
00:35:42.380 is Democrat
00:35:42.920 opinion of
00:35:43.560 Trump, worst
00:35:44.860 manager ever,
00:35:46.240 can't keep his
00:35:46.980 mouth shut,
00:35:48.060 spouts off
00:35:48.720 everything,
00:35:50.200 and yet
00:35:50.680 managed to
00:35:52.520 plan and
00:35:53.900 execute a
00:35:54.860 failed insurrection
00:35:55.820 without leaving
00:35:57.220 any evidence.
00:35:59.740 That's what you
00:36:00.720 have to believe
00:36:01.260 if you're a
00:36:01.700 Democrat,
00:36:01.980 that he did
00:36:03.800 this entire
00:36:04.360 insurrection and
00:36:05.300 they're looking
00:36:05.740 for evidence
00:36:06.440 and they
00:36:07.180 haven't found
00:36:07.740 any.
00:36:09.580 Can you
00:36:10.340 imagine any
00:36:10.920 scenario in
00:36:11.760 which Trump,
00:36:13.000 in the office
00:36:13.660 of the
00:36:14.020 president, the
00:36:15.140 most watched
00:36:16.120 office there
00:36:17.260 could ever be,
00:36:18.640 that he
00:36:19.100 planned and
00:36:19.960 executed an
00:36:20.740 insurrection
00:36:21.260 and left no
00:36:23.600 evidence?
00:36:25.120 Now, the
00:36:25.500 evidence they
00:36:26.040 have all
00:36:27.020 suggests another
00:36:27.880 motive.
00:36:29.340 All of it.
00:36:30.360 It's all
00:36:30.820 consistent with
00:36:31.620 exactly what he
00:36:32.500 said he wanted,
00:36:33.180 fraudulent,
00:36:33.820 which is to
00:36:34.540 delay the
00:36:36.380 certification for
00:36:37.460 an audit because
00:36:38.860 it looked fraudulent.
00:36:40.340 A lot of the
00:36:40.740 country thought it
00:36:41.380 looked fraudulent.
00:36:42.580 Wouldn't it be
00:36:43.180 better if the
00:36:43.840 Republican knew the
00:36:44.860 election was good?
00:36:45.680 So, if you
00:36:47.840 believe that had
00:36:49.200 they delayed and
00:36:50.340 audited, that
00:36:51.860 Trump would have
00:36:52.460 then said,
00:36:53.060 well, that
00:36:54.320 doesn't count,
00:36:55.020 I'm overthrowing
00:36:55.640 the country
00:36:56.020 anyway, that
00:36:57.700 is a big
00:36:58.360 leap.
00:36:59.420 That is a big
00:37:00.180 leap because
00:37:01.820 there's no
00:37:02.520 evidence that he
00:37:03.160 could have or
00:37:03.740 would have stayed
00:37:04.240 in office.
00:37:04.720 He had no
00:37:05.180 support within
00:37:07.140 his own
00:37:07.720 administration,
00:37:08.460 except for the
00:37:08.960 lawyers who get
00:37:09.600 paid to say
00:37:10.620 whatever you
00:37:10.980 want.
00:37:11.160 He had no
00:37:12.460 support for
00:37:13.600 staying in
00:37:14.080 office if the
00:37:14.720 election said
00:37:15.320 otherwise.
00:37:16.240 No support.
00:37:17.480 We know that.
00:37:18.200 That's an
00:37:19.060 evidence now.
00:37:21.940 So, how do
00:37:22.460 you believe
00:37:23.100 somebody says
00:37:26.500 the 2,000
00:37:27.220 mules thing
00:37:27.800 made the
00:37:28.520 but the
00:37:30.200 trouble is the
00:37:30.680 2,000 mules
00:37:31.420 thing has not
00:37:32.300 passed the
00:37:32.940 credibility check
00:37:33.960 yet.
00:37:34.940 It might.
00:37:36.160 It might.
00:37:36.980 but without
00:37:38.720 video evidence
00:37:39.580 of the same
00:37:40.040 people going
00:37:40.620 over and over
00:37:41.140 to some boxes
00:37:42.680 in some volume
00:37:43.680 that would
00:37:44.060 suggest the
00:37:45.160 larger claim
00:37:45.920 is true.
00:37:46.740 Without that,
00:37:48.400 you're right up
00:37:49.460 to a point of
00:37:51.540 having evidence
00:37:52.220 but you don't
00:37:53.020 quite.
00:37:54.100 You don't
00:37:54.340 quite.
00:37:54.840 You're almost
00:37:55.240 there.
00:37:56.520 It's very
00:37:57.040 provocative.
00:37:57.980 It raises
00:37:58.700 red flags as
00:37:59.720 everybody says
00:38:00.300 but it's not
00:38:02.720 there for me.
00:38:04.000 For me, the
00:38:04.600 2,000 mules
00:38:05.440 goes right up to
00:38:06.940 the line but
00:38:08.260 does not
00:38:08.720 present evidence.
00:38:10.400 Now, you could
00:38:10.820 argue what
00:38:11.280 evidence means
00:38:12.040 because it does
00:38:12.820 present evidence.
00:38:14.160 Let me modify
00:38:14.880 that.
00:38:15.560 It presents
00:38:16.080 what it would
00:38:16.960 the movie
00:38:18.940 presents what
00:38:19.960 it interprets
00:38:20.960 as solid
00:38:22.680 evidence.
00:38:24.280 I look at
00:38:25.020 it and I
00:38:25.520 say, that's
00:38:26.860 evidence but
00:38:28.600 it's definitely
00:38:29.120 not proof because
00:38:30.300 you can have
00:38:30.740 evidence of
00:38:31.320 things that
00:38:32.220 turns out not
00:38:32.960 to be true.
00:38:34.200 So, evidence
00:38:35.120 doesn't mean
00:38:35.720 true.
00:38:36.000 evidence means
00:38:37.180 you'd better
00:38:38.640 find out if
00:38:39.200 it's true.
00:38:42.960 Yes.
00:38:44.600 All right.
00:38:46.480 So, that would
00:38:47.260 be pretty amazing
00:38:47.960 if you did that
00:38:48.660 without leaving
00:38:49.440 any evidence.
00:38:50.880 So, apparently
00:38:51.440 there's a
00:38:51.980 competitor to
00:38:52.780 Neuralink,
00:38:54.460 Elon Musk's
00:38:55.440 company that
00:38:56.040 wants to put a
00:38:56.760 chip in your
00:38:57.300 skull and have
00:38:59.080 it communicate
00:38:59.580 with your brain.
00:39:00.820 But already,
00:39:01.940 as in this is
00:39:02.860 not the
00:39:03.220 theoretical,
00:39:04.260 this is already
00:39:05.040 happening or
00:39:05.920 already happened,
00:39:06.760 a company,
00:39:08.440 let's see,
00:39:09.100 so doctors at
00:39:09.740 Mount Sinai,
00:39:10.540 this is the new
00:39:11.120 company whose
00:39:11.620 name I'll think
00:39:12.260 of in a minute,
00:39:13.020 it's written down
00:39:13.520 here somewhere.
00:39:14.900 Anyway, this
00:39:15.500 new company
00:39:16.080 put some
00:39:18.000 electrodes into
00:39:19.160 blood vessels
00:39:20.820 in the brain
00:39:21.480 of a patient
00:39:22.040 with ALS.
00:39:23.040 So, these people
00:39:23.840 were paralyzed,
00:39:25.060 so they couldn't
00:39:26.040 communicate.
00:39:26.560 And they
00:39:28.080 learned through
00:39:29.520 this device
00:39:31.400 inserted into
00:39:32.460 their brain,
00:39:35.380 I guess,
00:39:36.140 yeah, into
00:39:36.520 their brain,
00:39:37.280 they learned to
00:39:38.120 send WhatsApp
00:39:38.660 messages with
00:39:40.320 their mind,
00:39:42.580 hello,
00:39:44.200 successfully.
00:39:46.020 People who
00:39:47.160 are paralyzed
00:39:48.920 are ordering
00:39:51.420 products on the
00:39:52.400 internet and
00:39:53.140 sending WhatsApp
00:39:54.000 messages with
00:39:55.700 their fucking
00:39:56.340 minds.
00:39:58.640 Hello.
00:40:01.740 What?
00:40:03.100 They're sending
00:40:03.940 messages with
00:40:04.980 their minds.
00:40:07.700 Oh, no.
00:40:09.660 That's amazing.
00:40:12.920 Now, I don't
00:40:13.860 know what that
00:40:14.420 means.
00:40:14.860 I don't think it
00:40:15.660 means they think
00:40:16.280 the words and
00:40:17.620 then the words
00:40:18.180 appear, do you?
00:40:19.340 I think it
00:40:19.920 probably means
00:40:20.580 they're moving a
00:40:21.260 cursor to select
00:40:22.920 letters, probably.
00:40:24.980 What do you
00:40:25.620 think?
00:40:27.880 I think it's
00:40:28.560 something like
00:40:28.880 that, but
00:40:29.760 that's just a
00:40:30.620 guess.
00:40:31.400 I think at some
00:40:32.180 point they'll be
00:40:32.740 able to think
00:40:33.920 words and have
00:40:34.680 them appear.
00:40:35.880 But I think if
00:40:36.560 you try to think
00:40:37.920 words and have
00:40:38.540 them appear, you
00:40:39.440 have the risk of
00:40:40.300 your naughty
00:40:42.400 thoughts appearing
00:40:43.620 on the screen, I
00:40:44.300 suppose.
00:40:45.900 You wouldn't
00:40:46.740 want my thoughts
00:40:48.520 turned into text.
00:40:50.340 Can you imagine
00:40:50.820 that?
00:40:52.860 I'd be like,
00:40:55.040 yeah, would
00:40:56.420 you mind
00:40:57.100 picking up
00:40:58.040 some milk
00:41:00.000 threesome
00:41:02.400 involved?
00:41:02.880 No, no.
00:41:03.760 Pick up the
00:41:04.340 milk.
00:41:06.580 Rapid, no,
00:41:08.180 no, no.
00:41:10.400 You know where
00:41:11.240 that was going.
00:41:12.060 You don't need
00:41:12.520 any examples.
00:41:14.140 All right.
00:41:14.420 They'll never
00:41:18.880 tell you what
00:41:19.420 to say, will
00:41:19.940 they?
00:41:20.680 Huh?
00:41:21.880 I wonder if
00:41:22.780 they could also
00:41:23.360 pick up
00:41:23.880 propaganda.
00:41:25.620 All right,
00:41:26.000 here's
00:41:26.520 something.
00:41:27.520 How about
00:41:28.040 an app?
00:41:29.660 Start writing
00:41:30.380 an app today
00:41:31.200 for a technology
00:41:32.300 that doesn't
00:41:32.820 exist yet,
00:41:33.500 which is, it
00:41:34.580 exists, but
00:41:35.060 it's too early.
00:41:36.100 So I assume
00:41:37.520 that these
00:41:38.200 implants in the
00:41:41.180 brains, whether
00:41:41.680 it's Neuralink
00:41:42.680 or other, would
00:41:43.220 work on apps,
00:41:44.200 right?
00:41:45.340 Is that a good
00:41:46.080 assumption or
00:41:46.580 no?
00:41:47.360 That once you
00:41:48.000 have a Neuralink
00:41:49.300 connected to your
00:41:50.180 brain, there's
00:41:52.180 more than one
00:41:52.880 app that will
00:41:53.620 connect to it.
00:41:54.280 Am I right?
00:41:56.000 So you could
00:41:56.540 write an app.
00:41:57.160 Could you not
00:41:57.800 write an app to
00:41:59.060 protect you from
00:42:00.420 propaganda?
00:42:02.320 Huh?
00:42:03.820 I'll bet you
00:42:04.400 could.
00:42:05.360 I'll bet you
00:42:06.060 could write a
00:42:06.760 Neuralink or
00:42:08.200 whatever company
00:42:08.900 this is.
00:42:09.420 I should say
00:42:10.040 the name.
00:42:10.540 Synchron, S-Y-M-C-H-R-O-N.
00:42:17.640 So that's a
00:42:18.140 startup, Synchron.
00:42:20.520 So already
00:42:23.320 implanted in four
00:42:24.900 patients in
00:42:25.460 Australia.
00:42:26.220 They've already
00:42:26.520 had it in.
00:42:27.280 The side effects
00:42:28.240 are minimal, I
00:42:28.900 guess.
00:42:31.040 So could you
00:42:33.480 write an app that
00:42:34.360 would protect the
00:42:35.220 wearer from
00:42:35.780 propaganda?
00:42:36.240 I say yes.
00:42:38.740 Do you know
00:42:40.560 how?
00:42:41.540 You could just
00:42:42.300 have all
00:42:42.980 information on
00:42:43.640 social media
00:42:44.200 tagged by some
00:42:47.340 trusted entity.
00:42:48.960 Fact checkers are
00:42:49.980 sketchy.
00:42:51.420 But you could have
00:42:52.220 some entity saying,
00:42:53.240 no, the headline
00:42:53.900 does not match the
00:42:54.720 story.
00:42:56.160 Suppose you just
00:42:56.820 knew that.
00:42:57.980 Suppose you're
00:42:59.340 reading a story and
00:43:00.640 you come across a
00:43:01.960 CNN headline and
00:43:03.660 as you're reading
00:43:04.520 it, your Neuralink
00:43:06.020 thing is connected
00:43:07.480 to the internet,
00:43:08.700 it picks up some
00:43:09.560 information that
00:43:10.560 the title of the
00:43:13.040 story doesn't match
00:43:13.740 the content and
00:43:15.040 it just shows up
00:43:16.320 that way to you.
00:43:18.020 So you're reading
00:43:18.660 it and suddenly a
00:43:19.640 tag shows up that
00:43:20.560 says, headline does
00:43:21.860 not match the
00:43:22.600 story.
00:43:24.800 Wouldn't you love
00:43:25.440 that?
00:43:27.840 Wouldn't you love
00:43:28.600 that?
00:43:29.620 Now that would
00:43:30.400 still make you read
00:43:31.340 the story if you
00:43:32.140 wanted to find out
00:43:32.760 what that means.
00:43:33.560 So you'd still be
00:43:34.380 left to your own
00:43:35.220 devices to
00:43:36.900 determine if it's
00:43:37.700 really propaganda.
00:43:39.460 But wouldn't you
00:43:40.140 like it flagged?
00:43:41.640 You know,
00:43:41.860 people say the
00:43:43.760 headline doesn't
00:43:44.800 match the story.
00:43:45.880 That would be
00:43:46.220 useful.
00:43:47.300 How about you
00:43:48.620 read a story and
00:43:49.760 then the chip
00:43:50.380 suddenly just gives
00:43:51.920 you this idea.
00:43:53.700 Wait a minute.
00:43:54.760 I haven't seen the
00:43:55.560 other side.
00:43:56.960 And that's all it
00:43:57.600 does.
00:43:58.900 You know, you're
00:43:59.500 looking at a story
00:44:00.280 and it just says,
00:44:01.880 wait a minute, you
00:44:02.580 haven't heard the
00:44:03.040 other argument.
00:44:03.520 And it just plays
00:44:04.660 that whenever you're
00:44:05.340 looking at a story.
00:44:07.480 I mean, that would
00:44:08.220 be annoying after a
00:44:09.080 while, but that's
00:44:10.320 what plays in my
00:44:11.020 head.
00:44:11.880 That's already
00:44:12.500 playing in my head,
00:44:13.240 so I wouldn't even
00:44:14.040 notice.
00:44:15.360 It's a very slippery
00:44:16.500 slope until the
00:44:18.040 machines control us.
00:44:19.160 That is correct.
00:44:20.300 Yeah, this, I
00:44:21.840 think you can say
00:44:23.900 with some certainty
00:44:24.740 now that the
00:44:25.380 machines will be
00:44:26.200 making our
00:44:26.680 decisions.
00:44:29.180 I wasn't sure
00:44:30.060 that I could say
00:44:30.740 that with complete
00:44:31.440 certainty, but now
00:44:33.060 I think I can.
00:44:34.540 So human
00:44:35.660 evolution will
00:44:37.920 get rid of our
00:44:39.360 faulty senses
00:44:41.660 and decision
00:44:42.300 making.
00:44:43.180 We will hand
00:44:44.240 off our decision
00:44:44.980 making to the
00:44:45.620 machines.
00:44:46.840 That's going to
00:44:47.540 happen.
00:44:48.800 Now, that doesn't
00:44:49.660 mean that you will
00:44:50.400 be unable to
00:44:51.880 make your own
00:44:52.340 decision.
00:44:52.840 So I'm not saying
00:44:53.460 you'll be unable.
00:44:54.980 I'm saying you'll
00:44:55.760 be so persuaded
00:44:56.820 that you won't
00:44:58.060 even really consider
00:44:58.880 it.
00:44:59.120 In the same
00:45:00.500 way, are CNN
00:45:01.420 users able to
00:45:02.900 see real news?
00:45:04.580 Well, are they?
00:45:06.620 Is a CNN
00:45:07.300 viewer able to
00:45:10.040 see that they're
00:45:10.820 being propagandized
00:45:12.240 as opposed to
00:45:12.940 informed?
00:45:13.440 Are they able?
00:45:14.660 You could argue
00:45:15.620 that they have
00:45:16.160 brains and they're
00:45:17.520 educated and that
00:45:18.680 they're able, but
00:45:20.060 are they?
00:45:21.320 Are they?
00:45:22.520 Are they really
00:45:23.500 able?
00:45:23.820 Because the
00:45:24.520 evidence would
00:45:25.080 suggest no, that
00:45:26.960 the ability to do
00:45:28.020 something is
00:45:28.500 unrelated to
00:45:29.400 whether they
00:45:29.840 actually do it.
00:45:31.340 Right?
00:45:31.560 Because free will
00:45:32.620 is an illusion.
00:45:34.000 So it doesn't
00:45:34.560 matter if you're
00:45:35.280 capable of it if
00:45:37.140 you're not going
00:45:37.740 to do it.
00:45:39.560 Right?
00:45:40.220 So would you be
00:45:41.600 capable of
00:45:42.600 overruling your
00:45:43.840 Apple Watch that
00:45:45.240 tells you to take
00:45:46.500 more steps?
00:45:47.840 Yes.
00:45:48.560 You're capable.
00:45:50.000 Are you going
00:45:50.500 to do it?
00:45:51.620 Are you going
00:45:52.380 to do it?
00:45:53.820 How many of
00:45:54.280 you have had
00:45:54.920 your, let's
00:45:56.120 say, sport
00:45:56.660 watch or
00:45:57.120 whatever, tell
00:45:58.160 you to take
00:45:58.740 more steps and
00:46:00.240 then you
00:46:00.620 didn't?
00:46:02.220 That you
00:46:02.520 didn't?
00:46:03.760 I'll bet after
00:46:04.420 a while every
00:46:05.120 one of you take
00:46:05.760 more steps when
00:46:06.540 your watch tells
00:46:07.240 you to do it.
00:46:07.720 You might not
00:46:08.140 get enough.
00:46:09.240 You still might
00:46:09.720 be short.
00:46:10.420 But I'll bet
00:46:10.900 every one of you
00:46:11.800 takes the stairs
00:46:12.680 or does some
00:46:13.880 little thing when
00:46:14.580 your watch tells
00:46:15.240 you you're short.
00:46:17.080 Could you ignore
00:46:17.900 it?
00:46:19.420 Now the people
00:46:19.980 who have ignored
00:46:20.520 it every time have
00:46:21.500 not been hypnotized
00:46:22.960 by it.
00:46:23.360 But once you
00:46:24.460 become, let's
00:46:25.460 say, acclimated
00:46:26.620 or a habit is
00:46:28.580 formed, you're
00:46:29.940 going to lose
00:46:30.420 the distinction
00:46:31.200 between is it
00:46:33.340 your choice or
00:46:34.040 the machine's
00:46:34.660 choice.
00:46:35.940 And I'm here to
00:46:37.180 tell you,
00:46:37.840 absolutely, it's
00:46:39.700 the machine's
00:46:40.360 choice in the
00:46:41.980 long run.
00:46:42.560 In the short
00:46:43.180 run, you won't
00:46:44.080 trust the machine
00:46:44.780 enough.
00:46:45.240 In the long run,
00:46:45.900 you will.
00:46:46.740 Once you trust
00:46:47.660 the machine to
00:46:48.420 make a better
00:46:48.940 decision than you
00:46:49.820 did, and it
00:46:50.860 usually will,
00:46:51.480 that's it.
00:46:53.960 That's it.
00:46:54.960 The machine will
00:46:55.540 make the decision
00:46:56.220 and you will
00:46:56.720 accept it.
00:46:58.500 So yeah, the
00:46:59.460 odds of humans
00:47:00.600 having this free
00:47:02.080 will or this
00:47:02.760 sense of free
00:47:03.360 will, it's
00:47:04.420 really going to
00:47:04.860 come under
00:47:05.260 challenge.
00:47:06.420 But we're not
00:47:07.180 necessarily going
00:47:07.740 to be worse
00:47:08.160 off.
00:47:09.860 So what I'm
00:47:10.880 not saying is
00:47:12.280 that this is a
00:47:13.080 dystopian nightmare
00:47:14.620 and we're
00:47:15.360 all going to
00:47:15.660 become soulless
00:47:17.740 machines, we
00:47:19.240 might just be
00:47:19.800 happier.
00:47:21.260 We might feel
00:47:22.620 that we have
00:47:22.940 more meaning of
00:47:23.700 life.
00:47:24.520 We might feel
00:47:25.120 smarter, happier,
00:47:26.380 healthier, who
00:47:27.020 knows?
00:47:27.580 I'm not saying
00:47:28.200 any of it's bad.
00:47:29.300 I'm just saying
00:47:29.980 that there isn't
00:47:30.500 any chance, really
00:47:32.400 there's no chance,
00:47:33.940 that humans will
00:47:34.700 continue to have
00:47:35.720 the agency of
00:47:36.680 making decisions
00:47:37.500 when the machines
00:47:38.800 will be so much
00:47:39.480 better at it.
00:47:40.400 For us, for our
00:47:42.060 own self-interest,
00:47:43.100 the machines will
00:47:43.600 do a better job.
00:47:44.820 So you will use
00:47:45.840 the machine because
00:47:48.220 it will just be so
00:47:49.020 useful.
00:47:50.140 Let me make an
00:47:51.060 analogy.
00:47:52.600 Do you remember
00:47:53.080 when smartphones
00:47:53.740 first came out?
00:47:55.780 How many people
00:47:56.560 said, I'm not
00:47:59.140 going to get a
00:47:59.560 smartphone.
00:48:00.680 My flip phone
00:48:01.680 does everything I
00:48:02.700 need.
00:48:03.660 Let me tell you,
00:48:04.420 bud, you get your
00:48:05.800 fancy smartphones,
00:48:07.600 I don't need no
00:48:08.340 fancy smartphones.
00:48:09.640 Do you know why?
00:48:10.600 Because I've got a
00:48:11.340 thing called free
00:48:12.240 will.
00:48:12.500 And my free
00:48:13.960 will says, I'm
00:48:15.500 just going to keep
00:48:16.060 buying a phone that
00:48:16.940 does everything I
00:48:17.820 need it to do.
00:48:18.560 I don't need your
00:48:19.260 apps, I don't need
00:48:20.220 your trouble.
00:48:21.120 Don't bother me
00:48:21.960 with your 4G or
00:48:22.960 5G, I don't need
00:48:23.960 that.
00:48:24.240 I just need a
00:48:25.240 flip phone.
00:48:26.580 Remember, a lot of
00:48:27.760 people said that.
00:48:29.340 How many people
00:48:30.240 still have a flip
00:48:31.080 phone?
00:48:32.500 I think you can
00:48:33.380 still buy them,
00:48:34.100 right?
00:48:35.400 Almost none.
00:48:36.300 It's like 2%,
00:48:37.160 right?
00:48:37.800 So, did the
00:48:40.920 people who
00:48:41.860 thought they
00:48:42.640 were going to
00:48:42.940 use flip phones
00:48:43.760 forever, and
00:48:44.840 then, you know,
00:48:45.780 went to the
00:48:46.480 other, is it
00:48:47.400 because they
00:48:49.220 used their
00:48:49.900 willpower, and
00:48:51.780 they said, well,
00:48:53.440 actually, there
00:48:54.260 are lots of
00:48:54.700 apps that would
00:48:55.300 be very helpful.
00:48:56.700 I think I want
00:48:57.420 to use those
00:48:58.020 helpful apps.
00:48:59.980 Probably not.
00:49:01.020 They just got
00:49:01.580 brainwashed into
00:49:02.520 doing what
00:49:03.120 everybody else
00:49:03.720 was doing.
00:49:04.140 So, the
00:49:07.100 technology makes
00:49:07.960 the decisions.
00:49:08.720 We don't make
00:49:09.360 the decisions.
00:49:10.920 We're assigned
00:49:11.420 our decisions
00:49:12.780 for most
00:49:13.400 stuff.
00:49:17.040 All right.
00:49:20.120 Use a flip
00:49:21.000 phone for
00:49:21.480 Ashley Madison
00:49:22.180 and Tinder.
00:49:22.880 Good for you.
00:49:26.620 Is there
00:49:27.360 anything that I
00:49:29.820 failed to
00:49:30.260 mention in
00:49:31.300 this amazing
00:49:31.960 live stream,
00:49:32.960 the highlight
00:49:33.460 of civilization?
00:49:35.440 All right.
00:49:36.220 Here's something
00:49:36.980 I wanted to
00:49:37.800 do, and I'm
00:49:38.840 going to do
00:49:39.040 this live
00:49:39.740 without having
00:49:40.240 thought it
00:49:40.600 out.
00:49:41.300 I'm going to
00:49:41.900 name things
00:49:42.520 that are
00:49:42.840 trending
00:49:43.260 positively,
00:49:44.840 even if only
00:49:45.920 a little bit,
00:49:47.360 meaning the
00:49:47.960 worst may have
00:49:48.660 happened already.
00:49:50.600 Energy prices.
00:49:53.240 Trending
00:49:53.800 positively, albeit
00:49:54.960 just a little
00:49:55.600 bit.
00:49:58.560 Nuclear
00:49:59.160 energy.
00:50:00.680 Trending
00:50:01.120 positive, quite
00:50:02.040 a bit.
00:50:02.460 decoupling
00:50:05.880 from China,
00:50:07.660 moving
00:50:08.580 positively.
00:50:10.680 Bringing
00:50:11.200 manufacturing
00:50:11.880 back to the
00:50:12.420 U.S., I
00:50:13.060 think there's
00:50:13.380 a lot
00:50:13.560 happening,
00:50:14.000 actually.
00:50:16.740 Immigration,
00:50:17.920 this is a
00:50:18.440 tough one,
00:50:19.900 because illegal
00:50:20.900 immigration is
00:50:21.820 the highest
00:50:22.340 it's been,
00:50:23.540 so you'd
00:50:24.000 say, well,
00:50:24.420 that's trending
00:50:24.960 bad.
00:50:26.200 But remember
00:50:27.300 the context.
00:50:29.060 We need
00:50:29.580 labor.
00:50:29.860 We have
00:50:30.340 a labor
00:50:30.700 shortage.
00:50:33.820 It is
00:50:34.500 unchecked
00:50:35.680 immigration
00:50:36.240 as bad
00:50:37.980 as normal
00:50:38.560 when we
00:50:40.140 need it.
00:50:41.380 Now, of
00:50:42.020 course, crime
00:50:42.620 and drugs are
00:50:43.220 coming across.
00:50:43.960 I'm not
00:50:44.220 ignoring it.
00:50:45.320 But it's not
00:50:46.280 what it looks
00:50:46.740 like when
00:50:47.520 you've got
00:50:47.940 an employment
00:50:49.440 problem.
00:50:50.240 It looks
00:50:50.620 different.
00:50:51.660 Because it's
00:50:52.780 illegal, I'm
00:50:53.940 not in favor
00:50:54.460 of it, but
00:50:56.140 we are using
00:50:56.920 it productively.
00:50:57.680 Otherwise,
00:50:58.660 they couldn't
00:50:59.000 come.
00:50:59.720 Well, meaning
00:51:00.400 that they
00:51:00.720 would stop
00:51:01.180 coming if
00:51:02.180 they heard
00:51:02.560 that the
00:51:02.880 people coming
00:51:03.360 weren't getting
00:51:03.860 jobs.
00:51:05.060 Right?
00:51:08.080 This is a
00:51:08.920 cope.
00:51:11.560 What the
00:51:12.260 fuck would I
00:51:12.720 be coping
00:51:13.200 with?
00:51:13.940 Somebody says
00:51:14.560 that this
00:51:14.940 is a
00:51:15.260 cope.
00:51:16.460 That's like
00:51:16.840 the lowest
00:51:17.600 level of
00:51:18.180 political
00:51:18.580 analysis.
00:51:20.320 That's a
00:51:20.940 cope.
00:51:22.220 That's a
00:51:22.620 cope.
00:51:23.440 What the
00:51:23.980 hell am I
00:51:24.340 coping with?
00:51:24.980 I have
00:51:27.000 nothing to
00:51:27.460 cope with.
00:51:28.240 School
00:51:28.520 choice.
00:51:29.560 School
00:51:29.940 choice is
00:51:30.580 trending
00:51:30.860 positive.
00:51:32.640 Right?
00:51:35.840 There are a
00:51:36.660 lot of
00:51:36.960 things trending
00:51:37.520 positive,
00:51:38.120 aren't there?
00:51:38.920 And the
00:51:39.380 things that
00:51:39.740 are not,
00:51:40.900 maybe they
00:51:41.360 don't matter.
00:51:42.520 How about
00:51:42.880 coronavirus?
00:51:43.960 Is it
00:51:44.320 trending
00:51:44.560 positive?
00:51:45.200 No, it's
00:51:45.540 not.
00:51:46.540 At the
00:51:47.040 moment, it
00:51:47.580 looks like
00:51:47.920 infections are
00:51:48.600 up.
00:51:49.700 But the
00:51:50.680 public doesn't
00:51:51.640 care.
00:51:52.000 So, maybe
00:51:53.820 the public
00:51:54.280 is trending
00:51:54.720 positive while
00:51:55.600 the virus is
00:51:56.440 trending up.
00:51:59.140 Deaths are
00:51:59.800 down, right?
00:52:00.560 That's
00:52:00.760 trending
00:52:01.000 positive from
00:52:01.660 coronavirus.
00:52:03.100 Monkeypox,
00:52:04.120 that's more
00:52:04.860 of a wait
00:52:06.100 and see.
00:52:11.720 How about
00:52:12.520 the economy?
00:52:13.640 The economy
00:52:14.180 in general?
00:52:14.680 I think the
00:52:16.220 economy in
00:52:16.900 general is
00:52:18.940 going through
00:52:19.860 a planned
00:52:20.580 slowdown,
00:52:21.400 right?
00:52:22.200 If you're
00:52:22.880 doing a
00:52:23.300 planned
00:52:23.840 slowdown
00:52:24.640 with a
00:52:25.200 strategic
00:52:25.600 purpose,
00:52:26.500 right?
00:52:26.760 We're going
00:52:27.040 to lower
00:52:27.280 inflation.
00:52:28.620 If you're
00:52:29.300 doing a
00:52:29.640 planned
00:52:30.020 slowdown
00:52:30.680 and then
00:52:31.620 you're
00:52:31.840 observing
00:52:32.220 that it's
00:52:32.620 happening,
00:52:34.540 is that
00:52:35.460 trending
00:52:35.740 positively or
00:52:36.540 negatively?
00:52:37.480 Now,
00:52:37.760 normally you'd
00:52:38.320 say,
00:52:38.560 wait,
00:52:38.780 a slowdown
00:52:39.360 is negative,
00:52:40.540 but you
00:52:41.040 have to
00:52:41.400 have them.
00:52:43.380 You can't
00:52:44.060 have a
00:52:44.340 bubble
00:52:44.580 forever.
00:52:45.440 A bubble
00:52:45.860 forever is,
00:52:46.680 you know,
00:52:46.920 that's just
00:52:47.260 asking for
00:52:47.700 trouble.
00:52:48.420 So,
00:52:48.740 if you're
00:52:48.900 doing a
00:52:49.260 planned
00:52:49.680 slowdown
00:52:50.440 and it
00:52:52.300 looks like
00:52:52.740 it's
00:52:52.940 happening,
00:52:54.280 that's
00:52:54.640 kind of
00:52:55.120 positive,
00:52:56.120 trending
00:52:56.560 positive.
00:52:59.220 How about
00:52:59.960 the supply
00:53:00.480 chains?
00:53:01.700 Shouldn't we
00:53:02.360 have been out
00:53:02.960 of everything
00:53:03.440 by now?
00:53:05.100 Feels like
00:53:05.740 it, right?
00:53:06.740 But we're
00:53:07.320 not.
00:53:08.640 I feel like
00:53:09.180 we're not
00:53:09.520 out of
00:53:09.800 everything.
00:53:11.060 So,
00:53:11.660 is that
00:53:12.000 trending
00:53:12.320 positive?
00:53:13.580 It feels
00:53:14.380 like the
00:53:14.780 number of
00:53:15.260 ships
00:53:15.480 waiting
00:53:15.820 actually
00:53:16.160 has
00:53:16.320 gone
00:53:16.520 down,
00:53:16.940 right?
00:53:17.960 Give me
00:53:18.380 a fact
00:53:18.720 check.
00:53:19.100 The number
00:53:19.440 of ships
00:53:19.840 waiting to
00:53:20.340 be unloaded
00:53:21.100 is lower
00:53:22.260 than the
00:53:22.700 peak,
00:53:24.080 right?
00:53:24.640 Trending
00:53:25.080 positive.
00:53:27.580 Technology,
00:53:28.260 trending
00:53:28.460 positive.
00:53:29.720 Our trust
00:53:30.420 of social
00:53:30.880 media is
00:53:32.140 going down.
00:53:33.040 That's a
00:53:33.360 positive
00:53:33.640 trend.
00:53:35.000 How about
00:53:35.540 Republican
00:53:36.360 popularity?
00:53:40.100 Or, let's
00:53:40.500 say,
00:53:40.840 popularity
00:53:41.400 of
00:53:41.960 non-crazy
00:53:43.540 views.
00:53:44.860 A year
00:53:45.240 ago,
00:53:45.920 I would
00:53:46.220 say that
00:53:46.600 the
00:53:46.820 crazies
00:53:47.500 were
00:53:47.940 winning.
00:53:50.640 That the
00:53:51.360 worst ideas
00:53:53.300 were growing
00:53:54.660 in importance.
00:53:56.040 Today, I
00:53:56.600 would say
00:53:56.880 that the
00:53:57.260 worst ideas
00:53:58.120 are reducing
00:53:59.400 in importance.
00:54:01.500 Wouldn't
00:54:02.100 you say?
00:54:04.980 Okay, the
00:54:05.900 trend situation
00:54:06.820 is purely
00:54:07.840 subjective.
00:54:09.340 In my
00:54:09.820 opinion, it's
00:54:10.420 trending
00:54:10.720 positive.
00:54:12.460 You would
00:54:12.940 say it's
00:54:13.280 trending
00:54:13.580 negative,
00:54:14.100 right?
00:54:15.420 That's real
00:54:15.980 subjective.
00:54:19.200 Here's why
00:54:19.800 I think it's
00:54:20.480 trending
00:54:20.720 positive.
00:54:21.940 Every time
00:54:22.500 we have
00:54:22.840 another one
00:54:23.520 of these
00:54:23.760 situations
00:54:24.260 where we
00:54:24.720 say,
00:54:25.480 hey, that
00:54:26.080 group of
00:54:26.560 people,
00:54:27.940 whoever it
00:54:28.460 is,
00:54:28.940 blacks,
00:54:30.160 women,
00:54:31.120 hey, that
00:54:31.580 group of
00:54:32.000 people, why
00:54:32.580 can't we
00:54:32.960 still discriminate
00:54:34.320 against them?
00:54:35.200 How about
00:54:35.440 gays?
00:54:35.940 Can't we
00:54:36.240 still discriminate
00:54:36.900 against them?
00:54:38.220 Every time
00:54:38.740 we find
00:54:39.140 a new
00:54:39.480 group to
00:54:39.980 say, how
00:54:40.460 about we
00:54:40.800 don't
00:54:41.100 discriminate
00:54:41.520 against them?
00:54:42.540 Now, the
00:54:42.900 trans is
00:54:43.320 tricky, because
00:54:44.700 when you
00:54:45.180 help them,
00:54:46.180 maybe it
00:54:46.680 hurts women,
00:54:47.360 I get it,
00:54:47.900 I get it,
00:54:48.320 there's a
00:54:48.620 trade-off.
00:54:49.580 But I
00:54:49.980 feel like
00:54:50.600 civilization
00:54:52.380 arguing over
00:54:53.300 the trans
00:54:54.020 issue, given
00:54:54.960 the small
00:54:55.900 percentage of
00:54:56.480 people involved,
00:54:58.120 that feels
00:54:58.860 like we're
00:55:00.400 at a healthy
00:55:00.900 place.
00:55:02.080 Because
00:55:02.540 disagreement is
00:55:03.360 not a bad
00:55:03.800 thing.
00:55:05.220 Am I right?
00:55:06.220 Would you
00:55:06.580 agree with me
00:55:07.140 that disagreement
00:55:07.840 is not a
00:55:08.320 bad thing?
00:55:09.380 Because that's
00:55:09.800 how everything
00:55:10.220 moves forward.
00:55:11.620 But this is
00:55:12.740 exactly where
00:55:13.700 we want to
00:55:14.140 be disagreeing.
00:55:15.880 We want to
00:55:16.820 be so
00:55:17.320 agreed that
00:55:18.820 women should
00:55:20.680 vote.
00:55:22.600 Remember,
00:55:23.240 these are
00:55:23.520 things that
00:55:23.940 we're not
00:55:24.340 agreed at.
00:55:25.360 At one
00:55:25.960 point, women
00:55:27.520 couldn't vote.
00:55:30.800 Blacks were
00:55:31.520 slaves and
00:55:32.240 couldn't vote
00:55:32.800 for a long
00:55:33.180 time.
00:55:33.460 look where
00:55:34.280 we've
00:55:34.500 gone.
00:55:35.300 And then
00:55:35.620 LGBTQ rights,
00:55:37.600 mostly gay
00:55:38.140 rights, much
00:55:38.980 improved.
00:55:40.120 If we've
00:55:40.820 gone all
00:55:41.680 the way,
00:55:42.560 all the way
00:55:43.560 through that
00:55:44.040 stuff, and
00:55:45.020 the last
00:55:45.520 thing we're
00:55:45.900 talking about
00:55:46.440 is trans,
00:55:47.820 because it's
00:55:48.320 the hardest
00:55:48.740 one.
00:55:50.620 It's the
00:55:51.240 hardest one,
00:55:51.860 because you
00:55:52.540 can't really
00:55:52.960 balance everybody's
00:55:53.900 interests just
00:55:54.960 the way you'd
00:55:55.420 want to.
00:55:56.420 So when I
00:55:58.060 see us arguing
00:55:58.720 about trans,
00:56:00.540 I say,
00:56:01.520 let's give
00:56:02.460 ourselves a
00:56:02.980 pat on the
00:56:03.520 back.
00:56:04.200 People.
00:56:05.380 People.
00:56:06.560 If we've
00:56:07.460 gone all
00:56:08.040 the way to,
00:56:09.100 well, of
00:56:09.440 course, everybody's
00:56:10.900 equal gender
00:56:11.980 wise, and
00:56:12.800 of course
00:56:13.240 everybody's
00:56:13.740 equal color
00:56:15.060 wise and
00:56:15.700 ethnicity, we've
00:56:17.080 completely dropped
00:56:17.960 those as, of
00:56:19.340 course, gay
00:56:20.160 marriage.
00:56:21.160 Maybe the
00:56:21.740 states should
00:56:22.240 decide, but
00:56:22.920 who's arguing
00:56:23.880 against it,
00:56:24.760 really?
00:56:26.320 Who's arguing
00:56:27.180 against interracial
00:56:28.960 marriage?
00:56:30.180 Basically nobody
00:56:31.200 that matters.
00:56:32.460 Right?
00:56:34.860 So you
00:56:35.540 could look at
00:56:36.000 the debate
00:56:36.800 over trans
00:56:37.400 as a negative
00:56:38.020 trend, because
00:56:39.860 you say, oh,
00:56:40.900 it's bad for
00:56:41.840 women.
00:56:42.280 I get your
00:56:42.880 argument.
00:56:43.680 I'm not pushing
00:56:44.520 back about the
00:56:45.320 things you
00:56:46.160 observe, but
00:56:47.700 just think about
00:56:48.480 the fact that
00:56:50.280 humanity has
00:56:52.120 evolved for,
00:56:53.080 you know, I'm
00:56:54.480 going to say
00:56:54.920 over 13
00:56:56.340 billion years,
00:56:57.060 because I
00:56:57.340 include pre-life,
00:56:58.580 trans, but
00:56:59.340 all of that
00:56:59.940 evolution, and
00:57:01.460 you're alive, you
00:57:03.360 get to be alive
00:57:04.340 when we go all
00:57:06.060 the way to, let's
00:57:06.920 talk about
00:57:07.360 trans, because
00:57:08.700 we've settled
00:57:09.180 everything else.
00:57:10.520 Everything else
00:57:11.100 is settled.
00:57:12.380 That's all we
00:57:13.080 have left.
00:57:15.040 You know, you
00:57:16.660 know what we
00:57:17.080 should be doing?
00:57:18.520 We should be
00:57:19.360 giving a big
00:57:20.220 fucking party for
00:57:22.380 the trans
00:57:22.940 community.
00:57:23.460 Do you know
00:57:24.840 why?
00:57:26.220 Because it's
00:57:26.700 our last fight.
00:57:28.900 It's our last
00:57:29.540 fight.
00:57:30.480 We should be
00:57:31.140 smiling over
00:57:32.620 this one.
00:57:33.820 This is the one
00:57:34.700 where we should
00:57:35.200 be accepting
00:57:35.700 victory, everybody.
00:57:38.180 Trans should
00:57:38.720 accept victory,
00:57:39.540 because we're
00:57:39.860 talking about
00:57:40.380 them, right?
00:57:42.140 If you're
00:57:42.780 talking about
00:57:43.440 their problem,
00:57:45.420 let's say not
00:57:46.180 problem, if
00:57:46.980 you're talking
00:57:47.280 about the
00:57:47.640 trans situation,
00:57:50.060 you're doing
00:57:50.800 what they want
00:57:51.440 you to do, so
00:57:53.100 they're feeling
00:57:53.740 some progress.
00:57:54.460 If you're
00:57:54.720 talking about
00:57:55.180 us, we feel
00:57:55.740 progress.
00:57:56.740 You know what
00:57:57.180 I feel?
00:57:58.140 I feel amazing
00:57:59.260 progress, because
00:58:00.800 it's our last
00:58:01.740 fight.
00:58:02.900 And this one's
00:58:04.380 fair.
00:58:05.800 You know what?
00:58:06.260 This is a fair
00:58:06.900 fight.
00:58:07.640 Because the
00:58:08.160 discussion about
00:58:08.980 do you do
00:58:10.420 something that
00:58:11.040 women would
00:58:11.600 consider degrading
00:58:13.440 to women,
00:58:14.320 degrading to,
00:58:15.340 not degrading in
00:58:16.560 terms of
00:58:17.020 humiliation, but
00:58:18.280 degrading in the
00:58:19.500 sense that they're
00:58:20.180 losing something,
00:58:21.560 that's the
00:58:22.340 discussion to
00:58:22.980 have.
00:58:24.100 And no matter
00:58:24.640 which way you
00:58:25.200 come down on
00:58:25.840 it, let's
00:58:27.200 agree, that is
00:58:28.820 a good human
00:58:29.740 discussion.
00:58:30.820 Human beings
00:58:31.660 should be saying,
00:58:32.480 yeah, we've got
00:58:33.540 these interests,
00:58:34.580 these are people
00:58:35.160 who matter, and
00:58:36.420 then you have
00:58:36.780 these other
00:58:37.180 side of interests,
00:58:37.900 and these people
00:58:38.440 matter too, so
00:58:39.580 let's talk about
00:58:40.200 it.
00:58:40.700 Oh my God, we've
00:58:42.140 never been in
00:58:42.680 better shape.
00:58:43.740 We have never
00:58:44.500 been in better
00:58:45.220 shape than when
00:58:46.700 we're arguing
00:58:47.320 about the trans
00:58:48.180 issue.
00:58:48.940 That is our
00:58:49.760 pinnacle of
00:58:50.580 best.
00:58:52.340 I'm not
00:58:53.340 wrong.
00:58:54.880 I'm not
00:58:55.500 wrong.
00:58:56.200 If you're
00:58:56.760 arguing about
00:58:57.420 trans, pat
00:58:58.760 yourself on the
00:58:59.480 fucking back, you
00:59:00.380 won.
00:59:02.080 It's the last
00:59:02.920 fight, it's
00:59:04.000 worth having,
00:59:05.120 completely worth
00:59:05.860 having, and
00:59:07.320 it's special.
00:59:08.960 It's like the
00:59:10.000 exception that
00:59:10.820 finally told us
00:59:12.680 something.
00:59:12.980 All right, if
00:59:13.380 that's all you
00:59:13.820 got left, if
00:59:15.080 that's all you
00:59:15.620 got left, you're
00:59:17.200 in good shape.
00:59:17.720 somebody else
00:59:21.880 says, no, it's
00:59:22.480 the end of
00:59:22.880 the road for
00:59:23.560 our moral
00:59:24.140 collapse.
00:59:26.260 Is it?
00:59:27.820 Really?
00:59:30.100 Let me point
00:59:31.100 to argue
00:59:32.400 against the
00:59:33.120 argument that
00:59:33.920 the trans
00:59:34.580 issue is an
00:59:36.140 indication of
00:59:36.920 our impending
00:59:37.800 moral collapse.
00:59:38.740 I offer you
00:59:40.340 100% of
00:59:42.500 everything that's
00:59:43.100 happened up
00:59:43.860 till now.
00:59:45.640 Every generation
00:59:46.560 believed that
00:59:47.400 they were
00:59:47.660 witnessing the
00:59:48.380 moral collapse
00:59:49.140 of the next
00:59:49.720 generation.
00:59:50.260 You know
00:59:51.540 that's true.
00:59:53.380 You know
00:59:53.860 that's true.
00:59:55.980 Every generation
00:59:57.140 believed they
00:59:57.860 were witnessing
00:59:58.520 the moral
00:59:59.340 collapse.
01:00:00.220 Yeah, Elvis.
01:00:01.940 Oh, it's all
01:00:02.660 going to collapse
01:00:03.180 now.
01:00:04.520 You know, my
01:00:04.920 generation was
01:00:05.660 good, but
01:00:06.700 these kids,
01:00:08.060 they got their
01:00:08.620 moral collapse
01:00:09.500 coming.
01:00:10.760 Now, maybe it's
01:00:11.680 going to be right
01:00:12.200 one of these
01:00:12.720 days.
01:00:15.040 Somebody said
01:00:15.740 the collapse of
01:00:16.380 Rome.
01:00:16.740 I don't think
01:00:17.200 Rome had a
01:00:17.960 moral problem.
01:00:19.340 I don't think
01:00:19.700 that's why it
01:00:20.160 collapsed.
01:00:21.900 I'm no
01:00:22.320 historian, but
01:00:23.020 I don't think
01:00:23.600 this analogy
01:00:24.440 is telling
01:00:25.340 you anything.
01:00:26.440 Now, I
01:00:26.900 think that
01:00:27.580 we're morally
01:00:28.320 stronger than
01:00:28.980 we've ever
01:00:29.400 been.
01:00:30.760 It doesn't
01:00:31.160 feel like it,
01:00:31.740 does it?
01:00:32.320 It's because
01:00:32.940 we're arguing
01:00:33.540 more that the
01:00:34.340 news has us
01:00:34.940 all whipped
01:00:35.460 up, but
01:00:36.580 morally and
01:00:37.240 ethically, we
01:00:37.920 are at the
01:00:38.460 strongest point
01:00:39.280 in a human
01:00:40.200 civilization, by
01:00:41.260 far.
01:00:42.080 By far, it's
01:00:42.720 not even close.
01:00:45.280 Now, we're
01:00:46.020 not close to
01:00:47.280 where we want
01:00:47.820 to be, perhaps,
01:00:48.840 but look where
01:00:49.540 we came
01:00:49.960 from.
01:00:50.640 My God.
01:00:53.900 Scott still
01:00:54.780 thinks trans
01:00:55.600 kids is fake
01:00:56.340 news.
01:00:57.040 We'll block
01:00:57.620 you for
01:01:00.080 assigning
01:01:00.680 ridiculous
01:01:01.300 opinions to
01:01:02.020 me.
01:01:03.280 All right.
01:01:03.800 So, when
01:01:04.780 you assign
01:01:05.460 a ridiculous
01:01:05.980 opinion to
01:01:06.660 me, you
01:01:07.880 are hidden
01:01:08.280 from the
01:01:08.720 channel.
01:01:10.560 Assign an
01:01:11.520 opinion to
01:01:11.980 me that
01:01:12.340 isn't fucking
01:01:12.900 stupid,
01:01:13.420 please.
01:01:15.260 That would
01:01:15.860 be great.
01:01:18.680 Scott can't
01:01:19.400 identify the
01:01:20.060 thing from
01:01:20.540 its opposite.
01:01:21.380 That's a good
01:01:21.840 comment.
01:01:22.660 So, my
01:01:23.220 overall comment
01:01:24.340 is that we
01:01:24.840 can't tell a
01:01:25.660 thing from the
01:01:26.260 opposite of the
01:01:26.820 thing.
01:01:27.700 So, somebody
01:01:28.500 here is
01:01:28.900 saying that
01:01:29.380 the trans is
01:01:30.380 a sign of
01:01:32.660 the end of
01:01:33.600 our moral
01:01:34.280 foundation.
01:01:36.360 And I'm
01:01:37.040 saying it's a
01:01:37.780 sign that we've
01:01:38.320 done everything
01:01:39.020 right up to
01:01:40.300 that point.
01:01:41.240 We really, really
01:01:42.180 did get it right
01:01:43.060 up to that point.
01:01:44.400 And we still got
01:01:45.240 one little thing.
01:01:46.280 Those are
01:01:46.700 opposites.
01:01:48.700 That's actually a
01:01:49.700 perfect...
01:01:50.260 I love that
01:01:50.760 comment.
01:01:51.060 Because think
01:01:52.300 of how many
01:01:52.740 things we're
01:01:53.600 looking at now
01:01:54.260 in the world
01:01:54.800 where we're
01:01:56.360 seeing a thing
01:01:56.940 and its
01:01:57.380 opposite.
01:01:58.760 Did Trump
01:01:59.500 try to save
01:02:00.120 the republic
01:02:00.720 by, you
01:02:02.780 know, pausing
01:02:03.540 to give an
01:02:04.240 audit of what
01:02:04.920 looked like it
01:02:05.540 could have been
01:02:06.100 a rigged
01:02:06.840 election?
01:02:07.480 We don't have
01:02:07.980 proof of that.
01:02:09.460 But...
01:02:10.020 Or was he
01:02:11.300 running an
01:02:11.860 insurrection to
01:02:12.620 take over and
01:02:13.460 he was ignoring
01:02:14.220 democracy?
01:02:15.560 Those are
01:02:15.960 opposites.
01:02:17.220 And we can't
01:02:17.720 tell the difference.
01:02:18.860 You know, maybe
01:02:19.220 you can.
01:02:20.060 But the public
01:02:20.900 is having
01:02:21.300 trouble
01:02:21.700 distinguishing
01:02:22.860 opposites.
01:02:24.260 I mean, you
01:02:24.660 couldn't get
01:02:25.000 more opposite
01:02:25.640 than saving
01:02:27.080 the republic
01:02:27.660 versus destroying
01:02:28.900 it.
01:02:29.600 Those are
01:02:29.980 opposites.
01:02:30.840 And I don't
01:02:31.460 know that we
01:02:31.960 ever were all
01:02:34.040 the way to
01:02:34.840 opposites.
01:02:36.840 Usually we
01:02:37.720 disagreed on
01:02:38.520 some facts and
01:02:39.320 stuff, but
01:02:39.800 opposites?
01:02:40.460 This is new.
01:02:44.460 All right.
01:02:45.100 after the
01:02:50.940 viral Bill
01:02:51.560 said, it's
01:02:53.240 okay to ask
01:02:53.880 questions when
01:02:54.600 children are
01:02:55.280 involved.
01:02:55.900 I don't
01:02:56.080 know the
01:02:56.340 context of
01:02:56.900 that.
01:02:59.380 All right,
01:02:59.900 here's another
01:03:00.420 prediction.
01:03:03.720 Remember at
01:03:04.300 the beginning of
01:03:04.740 the pandemic, I
01:03:05.480 told you that
01:03:06.100 leadership would
01:03:07.240 not show up in
01:03:08.160 the results.
01:03:10.560 What do you
01:03:11.140 think?
01:03:12.000 I said leadership
01:03:13.020 would not show up
01:03:13.960 in the final
01:03:14.440 results.
01:03:15.540 Now New
01:03:15.940 Zealand's got a
01:03:16.560 problem, China's
01:03:17.580 got a problem.
01:03:19.840 What do you
01:03:20.400 think?
01:03:21.380 Now I think you
01:03:22.200 could make an
01:03:22.680 argument that
01:03:23.560 DeSantis'
01:03:24.440 leadership worked.
01:03:25.920 I'm going to
01:03:26.600 push back
01:03:27.740 against that.
01:03:30.620 Do you all
01:03:31.440 accept?
01:03:32.620 This will be
01:03:33.160 fun.
01:03:34.040 There's something
01:03:34.580 that I believe
01:03:35.140 that all
01:03:35.480 Republicans seem
01:03:36.440 to accept that
01:03:37.380 I'm going to
01:03:37.800 call fake.
01:03:39.220 You believe
01:03:40.120 that DeSantis
01:03:41.080 did a better
01:03:42.080 job protecting
01:03:43.420 the elderly.
01:03:44.900 Correct?
01:03:46.800 You believe
01:03:47.660 that DeSantis
01:03:48.640 did a better
01:03:49.260 job of
01:03:49.800 protecting the
01:03:50.420 elderly, which
01:03:51.280 was the right
01:03:51.720 thing to do,
01:03:52.460 and that
01:03:53.180 Governor Cuomo
01:03:54.320 did a bad
01:03:55.080 job.
01:03:57.380 Here's what I
01:03:58.140 think.
01:03:59.300 I think that
01:04:00.040 there were
01:04:00.480 some government
01:04:02.980 officials below
01:04:04.920 the governor
01:04:05.560 level that did
01:04:07.280 a good job in
01:04:08.000 Florida, and
01:04:09.400 there were some
01:04:09.780 people below
01:04:10.380 the governor
01:04:10.940 level in New
01:04:11.840 York that
01:04:12.260 fucked up badly.
01:04:13.420 And in both
01:04:14.340 cases, the
01:04:15.040 governor gets
01:04:15.600 the blame or
01:04:16.420 the credit.
01:04:17.680 I don't
01:04:18.480 believe that
01:04:19.500 Governor Cuomo
01:04:20.300 himself ever
01:04:21.180 said, you
01:04:21.560 know what, let's
01:04:23.040 put these sick
01:04:23.620 people back in
01:04:24.380 the nursing
01:04:24.880 homes.
01:04:25.960 Nor do I
01:04:26.880 believe that
01:04:27.800 Governor DeSantis
01:04:28.780 ever had an
01:04:29.740 occasion to
01:04:31.140 look over what
01:04:31.960 was happening
01:04:32.380 and say, wait
01:04:32.900 a minute, are
01:04:33.880 you putting
01:04:34.300 these sick
01:04:34.760 people back
01:04:35.340 in these
01:04:37.900 homes?
01:04:39.080 Probably they
01:04:40.000 told him.
01:04:40.680 probably DeSantis
01:04:43.180 staff said, we're
01:04:44.380 not going to put
01:04:44.860 these people back
01:04:45.580 in those homes.
01:04:46.820 Here's why.
01:04:48.160 And then DeSantis
01:04:48.940 probably said, I'm
01:04:50.680 getting a fact
01:04:51.200 check on this, so I
01:04:51.840 might be wrong.
01:04:53.740 DeSantis probably
01:04:54.540 said, I agree with
01:04:55.460 my experts, go do
01:04:56.480 the right thing.
01:04:59.520 So here's the
01:05:00.300 question.
01:05:01.260 Did both of the
01:05:02.040 governors rely on
01:05:03.340 their experts?
01:05:05.460 Let me boil it
01:05:06.380 down to that
01:05:06.800 question.
01:05:07.140 And I did a
01:05:08.900 fact check on
01:05:09.420 this because I'm
01:05:10.200 a little murky on
01:05:11.020 some of the
01:05:12.880 details.
01:05:13.740 Did both
01:05:14.260 governors rely on
01:05:15.900 their experts,
01:05:17.240 their local
01:05:17.740 experts?
01:05:20.060 If they did, they
01:05:21.100 performed the
01:05:21.660 same.
01:05:23.960 Right?
01:05:26.700 And do you
01:05:27.400 know that?
01:05:28.300 Do you know
01:05:29.040 the answer?
01:05:30.140 If they both
01:05:30.860 believed they were
01:05:31.420 experts and then
01:05:32.180 acted on it, they
01:05:32.860 performed the
01:05:33.500 same, but they
01:05:34.040 got very different
01:05:34.600 outcomes.
01:05:35.700 Now, I don't
01:05:36.340 know the answer
01:05:36.880 to that, and
01:05:37.440 here's the thing,
01:05:38.020 you probably don't
01:05:38.840 either, do you?
01:05:40.260 Do you know if
01:05:41.200 one of them ignored
01:05:42.120 the experts and
01:05:42.960 one of them
01:05:43.340 followed the
01:05:43.940 experts?
01:05:44.900 I'll bet that
01:05:45.420 didn't happen.
01:05:46.980 Do you think the
01:05:47.720 experts came to
01:05:48.560 Cuomo and said,
01:05:49.160 look, if you put
01:05:50.020 them back in the
01:05:50.600 nursing homes, it's
01:05:51.320 a disaster?
01:05:52.820 And then Cuomo
01:05:53.460 said, you know,
01:05:54.560 but I think we
01:05:55.120 should do it
01:05:55.540 anyway.
01:05:56.340 Why?
01:05:56.700 Why?
01:05:58.580 Why would Cuomo
01:05:59.680 overrule his own
01:06:01.520 experts and say, no,
01:06:03.060 put them in the
01:06:03.660 nursing home?
01:06:04.720 Why would he do
01:06:05.340 that?
01:06:06.340 I don't know.
01:06:09.400 But you don't
01:06:10.260 know it either,
01:06:10.800 do you?
01:06:13.240 Maybe he's a
01:06:13.960 criminal, somebody
01:06:14.600 said.
01:06:16.640 Somebody says
01:06:17.320 there's a payoff.
01:06:18.460 I don't know.
01:06:19.160 I don't know.
01:06:20.400 I don't know.
01:06:21.200 My guess is that
01:06:22.200 they both had
01:06:22.800 experts and New
01:06:24.680 York had competent
01:06:25.480 people in that
01:06:26.200 area.
01:06:26.880 They did their
01:06:27.680 thing and it
01:06:28.220 worked out.
01:06:29.480 New York had
01:06:30.080 somebody incompetent
01:06:31.160 below the
01:06:31.620 governor's level and
01:06:32.420 it didn't work out.
01:06:33.400 Now, I do agree
01:06:34.300 that the governor
01:06:35.160 gets the credit
01:06:35.980 and the governor
01:06:36.560 gets the blame.
01:06:37.840 We do have a
01:06:38.620 system where you
01:06:40.180 give credit and
01:06:40.860 blame even if
01:06:41.680 it's not exactly
01:06:42.500 leadership.
01:06:46.060 So I think the
01:06:46.940 one example that
01:06:47.720 we have where we
01:06:49.760 could say, okay,
01:06:50.540 leadership definitely
01:06:51.280 made a difference in
01:06:52.440 that case.
01:06:53.140 As soon as you
01:06:54.100 drill down, it
01:06:54.960 disappears.
01:06:56.760 Because both the
01:06:57.640 leaders acted the
01:06:58.500 same.
01:06:59.400 They did what their
01:07:00.140 staff told them
01:07:00.860 would work.
01:07:01.360 So if they
01:07:05.240 did, there's no
01:07:06.760 signal for
01:07:07.360 leadership whatsoever.
01:07:09.800 So I'm going to
01:07:10.520 maintain that that
01:07:12.000 exception actually
01:07:13.360 proves my point.
01:07:15.820 That you couldn't
01:07:16.780 see any leadership
01:07:17.500 signal whatsoever.
01:07:20.020 Now, somebody
01:07:21.640 says you're wrong.
01:07:23.560 Wrong about what
01:07:24.440 specifically?
01:07:28.100 Somebody says
01:07:28.940 blindly following
01:07:29.900 experts is a lack
01:07:30.940 of leadership.
01:07:32.240 I will give you
01:07:33.180 that.
01:07:33.980 Blindly following
01:07:34.740 them is a lack
01:07:35.420 of leadership.
01:07:36.400 But if it's true
01:07:37.760 that both governors
01:07:38.680 followed them, I
01:07:42.260 mean, that's more
01:07:43.320 of a staff
01:07:44.260 coincidence problem.
01:07:45.600 One had a good
01:07:46.180 staff, one didn't.
01:07:47.980 I'm not sure
01:07:48.580 anybody would have
01:07:49.220 known that they
01:07:50.040 were going to get
01:07:50.420 the wrong
01:07:50.780 recommendation, if
01:07:52.540 that's what
01:07:52.900 happened.
01:07:56.080 Cuomo was
01:07:56.940 clearing hospital
01:07:57.900 beds.
01:07:58.360 Yeah, I mean, he
01:07:58.980 had a reason for
01:07:59.720 doing what he did.
01:08:00.940 He had a reason.
01:08:02.820 But what did his
01:08:04.740 experts tell him was
01:08:05.760 the best thing to
01:08:06.400 do?
01:08:07.680 If he did what his
01:08:08.760 experts told him to
01:08:09.700 do, I don't know.
01:08:12.000 Now, as Mimi says,
01:08:14.240 you're guessing.
01:08:15.680 That is correct.
01:08:17.720 But Mimi, do you
01:08:18.820 follow my point?
01:08:20.320 I'm guessing because
01:08:21.520 there's no evidence
01:08:22.700 either way.
01:08:24.680 I have to guess because
01:08:27.280 I don't know.
01:08:28.900 If I don't know, then
01:08:31.020 if it serves my
01:08:32.060 point that there's
01:08:32.800 no signal for
01:08:33.560 leadership, you
01:08:34.960 could say there
01:08:35.780 might be, if you
01:08:37.460 dug into it, you
01:08:38.180 might find that it
01:08:39.180 was actually the
01:08:39.820 leaders that made
01:08:40.660 the decisions, not
01:08:41.640 the experts.
01:08:42.480 In which case, I'd
01:08:43.460 say, whoa, okay,
01:08:44.420 surprising.
01:08:45.480 I would have
01:08:45.900 expected both
01:08:46.640 governors to do
01:08:47.420 whatever their
01:08:47.840 experts told them.
01:08:48.660 If one of those
01:08:49.900 experts overrode
01:08:51.820 the, if one of
01:08:52.940 those governors,
01:08:53.760 let's say DeSantis,
01:08:54.860 if he overrode the
01:08:56.340 experts and got it
01:08:58.220 right, well, that's
01:09:00.240 superstar stuff.
01:09:01.800 But I don't think
01:09:02.440 that happened.
01:09:03.320 If Cuomo overrode his
01:09:05.080 own experts and got
01:09:08.020 it wrong, well, that's
01:09:09.820 pretty bad.
01:09:12.000 That's pretty bad.
01:09:13.240 But we don't have
01:09:13.900 that, that's not an
01:09:15.060 evidence, right?
01:09:16.280 If it were an
01:09:17.120 evidence, that's
01:09:18.340 different.
01:09:18.660 So I think that
01:09:22.060 was one of my most
01:09:23.080 unusual predictions,
01:09:24.840 and I've had some
01:09:25.480 unusual ones.
01:09:27.240 My most unusual
01:09:28.100 one is that evolution
01:09:29.200 would be debunked in
01:09:30.540 scientific terms, and
01:09:33.120 now we have the
01:09:33.720 simulation theory.
01:09:35.640 So who saw that
01:09:37.920 coming?
01:09:39.360 I did.
01:09:41.060 Do you remember
01:09:41.840 that I told you at
01:09:42.720 the beginning of the
01:09:43.520 Trump saga in 2015
01:09:45.600 that he would change
01:09:46.580 more than politics?
01:09:48.660 I said that Trump
01:09:50.300 would change reality
01:09:52.180 itself.
01:09:53.900 And then he showed
01:09:54.880 us fake news, and
01:09:57.080 then he changed
01:09:57.620 reality itself.
01:09:59.160 That's where we are.
01:10:01.380 So I'm not going to
01:10:04.300 claim all my
01:10:04.900 predictions have been
01:10:05.800 correct.
01:10:06.580 There's some notable
01:10:07.340 ones that were wrong.
01:10:08.120 but would you give me
01:10:11.260 this, that my
01:10:12.700 weirdest predictions,
01:10:13.980 like the ones that
01:10:14.640 just are batshit crazy
01:10:15.780 on the surface,
01:10:17.180 have come true.
01:10:18.740 The most batshit
01:10:20.200 predictions I've made
01:10:21.100 have actually just
01:10:22.140 come in.
01:10:23.280 You've got to give me
01:10:23.860 that, because I think
01:10:24.980 that's objectively true.
01:10:26.140 But a number of, I
01:10:30.200 would say, ordinary
01:10:31.420 predictions.
01:10:32.680 I predicted who
01:10:33.520 would be the vice
01:10:34.220 president pick for
01:10:35.280 Trump.
01:10:35.680 I got that wrong.
01:10:37.060 So there are a bunch
01:10:37.700 of things that I got
01:10:38.340 wrong.
01:10:39.160 But the ones I got
01:10:39.840 wrong were sort of
01:10:40.560 ordinary ones, you
01:10:42.340 know, the ones
01:10:42.740 anybody gets wrong.
01:10:44.020 The weird, the weird
01:10:45.760 long-term ones, those
01:10:48.640 are the ones that, you
01:10:50.260 know, should tell you
01:10:50.900 something.
01:10:52.600 Did you predict
01:10:53.460 Michael Schellenberger
01:10:54.400 would win?
01:10:55.220 No.
01:10:56.200 I predicted that he
01:10:57.240 could do it if
01:10:58.340 anybody could do it.
01:11:00.420 Predicting a win by
01:11:02.240 anybody but a
01:11:02.960 Democrat in California
01:11:03.960 would be, that would
01:11:05.480 be a tough prediction.
01:11:09.360 Yeah, I was optimistic.
01:11:11.520 I thought things could
01:11:13.040 catch on, but they,
01:11:14.700 you know, and I
01:11:15.640 thought it was sort
01:11:16.240 of a spark that had
01:11:17.860 a good chance of
01:11:18.560 catching on, but it
01:11:19.320 didn't catch on.
01:11:21.980 Yeah, and there's
01:11:22.600 just too much
01:11:23.900 inertia for the
01:11:24.820 Democrats.
01:11:28.360 Yeah, I saw Mike
01:11:29.360 Sernovich's tweet
01:11:31.360 about targeting of,
01:11:33.760 or the hunting of
01:11:34.500 Republicans.
01:11:35.540 I always appreciate
01:11:36.680 Mike.
01:11:41.460 All right.
01:11:44.680 And that, ladies
01:11:45.560 and gentlemen, no,
01:11:46.860 Michelle Obama is not
01:11:47.860 running for president.
01:11:50.280 And that, ladies and
01:11:51.300 gentlemen, is all I have
01:11:52.280 for today.
01:11:53.140 I think you would
01:11:53.980 agree.
01:11:54.780 One of the best
01:11:55.520 podcasts of all
01:11:56.640 time.
01:11:57.800 If you're listening on
01:11:59.040 Spotify, I've been
01:12:00.380 asked to give a shout
01:12:01.360 out to you.
01:12:02.520 So, all you other
01:12:03.520 podcast listeners who
01:12:04.680 are not on YouTube, I
01:12:05.900 forget to mention you.
01:12:07.700 I always forget the
01:12:08.840 podcast because that
01:12:10.200 happens after I do this,
01:12:12.880 like it gets turned
01:12:13.760 into a podcast.
01:12:15.080 I have no idea how
01:12:16.260 many people consume
01:12:17.820 this.
01:12:18.780 Does anybody know how
01:12:19.540 to figure that out?
01:12:21.580 Because I don't
01:12:22.260 think podcasts have
01:12:23.340 any real data behind
01:12:24.480 it, right?
01:12:24.960 There's no way to
01:12:25.600 know how many people
01:12:26.240 watch it.
01:12:27.360 So, I have no idea
01:12:28.580 how many people
01:12:29.400 consume my content.
01:12:32.160 My guess is 50 to
01:12:33.640 100,000 per episode.
01:12:36.380 Closer to 50.
01:12:37.560 You know, 100 would
01:12:38.320 be a special day.
01:12:40.600 That's what I think,
01:12:41.840 but I don't know.
01:12:42.480 Look at the downloads
01:12:46.080 from your hosting
01:12:47.160 service.
01:12:49.740 How do you do that?
01:12:53.360 All right.
01:12:53.960 That's all for now.
01:12:54.620 I'll talk to you all
01:12:55.360 later.
01:12:56.980 Bye for now.