Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1812 Scott Adams： I Found Out Artificial Intelligence Gets Information From Me. Uh-Oh

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:08.340 Yes, yes, it's laundry day.

00:00:10.120 I don't have my usual blue shirt on.

00:00:12.780 Give me a day.

00:00:14.180 I'm busy.

00:00:15.840 This is my green shirt.

00:00:17.360 I only have one of them.

00:00:18.420 It's laundry day.

00:00:21.040 But if you'd like to take your experience up to the maximum,

00:00:25.000 and you're going to need it for today.

00:00:26.680 Oh, boy, do I have content for you today.

00:00:28.800 Oh, oh, boy.

00:00:31.000 And all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein,

00:00:35.540 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind,

00:00:37.700 to fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:39.340 I like coffee.

00:00:41.120 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:45.640 It's the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:47.800 You might need some serotonin, too.

00:00:49.900 No, that's been debunked.

00:00:51.480 Sorry.

00:00:52.420 And join me now for the simultaneous sip.

00:00:55.540 Go.

00:01:00.000 I just saw a meme on the locals' platform.

00:01:12.320 I've seen it before, but it always makes me laugh.

00:01:15.480 Do you know what the advantage of right-wing women is?

00:01:20.260 If you're looking to date, what's the advantage of dating a right-wing woman?

00:01:27.900 This is for YouTube.

00:01:30.460 People on Locals already saw the punchline.

00:01:33.800 The advantage of a right-wing woman?

00:01:36.760 No penis.

00:01:37.660 All right.

00:01:40.720 Apparently, what we thought was what I thought.

00:01:44.160 I got fooled by fake news.

00:01:46.560 But it's such good fake news, I don't even feel bad about it.

00:01:50.360 If you're going to be fooled by fake news, you want to be fooled by a really good example of it.

00:01:56.040 And there was a good one yesterday.

00:01:58.720 Did you see the alleged statement from Trump?

00:02:01.860 And he was calling himself Herculean, and he said there was a Kevin Sorbo and Lou Ferrigno mention.

00:02:15.740 Apparently, those were fake.

00:02:18.180 Did you know that?

00:02:19.020 Those weren't real.

00:02:20.320 But whoever did the fake wrote them so well that I actually thought it was Trump.

00:02:25.340 And I thought, wow, he's really on a roll.

00:02:27.120 Anyway, the fake one was every bit as good as a real one.

00:02:34.940 Yeah.

00:02:35.500 Like Kevin Sorbo.

00:02:37.780 That was hilarious.

00:02:39.720 I laughed for 10 minutes.

00:02:41.540 I don't even mind that I got fooled by that.

00:02:45.600 Did anybody else get fooled by that?

00:02:47.620 And then when you found out you were fooled, you're like, ah, that was a good one.

00:02:51.960 So I could be fooled by more of those.

00:02:54.380 That was fine.

00:02:54.940 Did I mention Bret Stephens last time?

00:03:00.840 I can't remember if I did.

00:03:02.300 So he wrote a piece, I think it's in the New York Times, and he was saying that the anti-Trumpers

00:03:09.460 haven't really dealt with the fact that the Russia collusion hoax was a hoax.

00:03:13.620 And it started out by essentially sort of an apology for his own role, and now he can see

00:03:21.960 that the Russia collusion thing was purely a hoax from the end, and he thinks that we

00:03:27.840 have to deal with that more honestly and deal with that as a hoax.

00:03:31.140 And I thought, my goodness, my goodness, here we really have some advantage, right?

00:03:38.400 Things are going well here, because here the New York Times is calling out a hoax, the Russia

00:03:44.080 collusion hoax.

00:03:44.860 And, you know, it's an opinion piece, but still.

00:03:49.320 And then he closed his thing by talking about Trump destroying the Republic on January 6th.

00:03:57.180 And I thought to myself, hmm, apparently he's learned nothing.

00:04:01.620 Nothing at all.

00:04:02.560 All he did was go from the debunked hoax to the replacement hoax.

00:04:09.040 January 6th is literally the replacement hoax for the Russia collusion hoax that fell apart.

00:04:15.820 All he did was say, yeah, that old hoax was a hoax, but I'm glad we have this new thing.

00:04:22.500 And he actually embraced the new hoax like it was real.

00:04:28.600 He was so close to being self-aware.

00:04:31.240 And then it all went to hell.

00:04:34.320 He couldn't tell the difference between a hoax while he's in it.

00:04:38.040 He could definitely tell the difference between a hoax and reality after the fact.

00:04:43.120 After the fact.

00:04:44.600 But when he's in it, not so good.

00:04:46.740 Not so good.

00:04:48.820 Well, there's a big study out saying that depression is not caused by a chemical imbalance of serotonin,

00:04:56.180 specifically.

00:04:56.800 This news is half fake news and maybe some of it's real.

00:05:02.580 Here's the fake part.

00:05:04.640 The headline said depression is not caused by a chemical imbalance.

00:05:10.340 The detail of the study said, not that.

00:05:15.800 Right.

00:05:16.180 So the first thing you have to know is that the headline, depression is not caused by a chemical imbalance.

00:05:22.260 It has nothing to do with the story.

00:05:24.680 That's not.

00:05:25.480 The story doesn't even involve that.

00:05:28.940 The story is completely unrelated to the actual study.

00:05:33.040 The study found one chemical, serotonin, which experts believed was somewhat critical in this process, wasn't important.

00:05:44.980 So knowing that one chemical that we thought was the main one is not the main thing does not mean that it's not a chemical, chemical situation.

00:05:58.700 Am I right?

00:06:00.260 So it's fake news about fake news.

00:06:02.460 Like the fake news is that serotonin was part of it, but then they fake newsed it by turning it into all chemical.

00:06:09.260 I don't think they've, that what they've certainly not done, what they've certainly not done is shown that depression is not a chemical reaction, some kind of a chemical state.

00:06:18.780 Is serotonin something that can be supplemented?

00:06:23.960 Yes.

00:06:24.540 Well, supplemented or stimulated.

00:06:28.180 I don't know the right word for that, but yes, that's what the, that's what some drugs do specifically.

00:06:35.460 I believe.

00:06:36.700 Yeah, we are, we are nothing but a chemistry experience, experiment.

00:06:40.540 So to say that depression is not related to our chemical state feels like it couldn't possibly be true.

00:06:50.400 Granted, there's one chemical we've ruled out, but it's still just chemicals.

00:06:57.580 You know what it'd be like?

00:06:58.700 It'd be like you go to the beach and you scoop up some sand.

00:07:03.500 You say, well, I've proven that there's no sand in the beach because I've got this little handful here.

00:07:08.640 Well, what about that other sand, you might say?

00:07:13.960 All right, so this brings us to the question of, as everything does, everything comes back to Tom Cruise and Top Gun.

00:07:23.920 If it doesn't come back to Joe Rogan and it doesn't come back to Tom Cruise and Top Gun, we don't care about it.

00:07:32.400 It's not important.

00:07:33.120 But do you remember, many of you remember the famous Tom Cruise thing where he was saying that psychiatry is bullshit and, you know, they're just drugging us up with these unnecessary drugs and everybody laughed at him.

00:07:48.980 Poor Tom Cruise.

00:07:51.240 Well, well, not so funny now, huh?

00:07:55.080 Not so funny now.

00:07:56.460 Because his claim that people were being drugged incorrectly,

00:08:02.160 it wasn't helping,

00:08:03.540 appears to be more correct than not correct.

00:08:08.280 Now, here's the part that somebody said,

00:08:10.380 but wait, Scott, he's part of Scientology.

00:08:15.180 Scientology doesn't have the answer.

00:08:18.260 Scientology isn't going to help your depression, is it?

00:08:22.020 Eh, eh.

00:08:25.060 Are you sure about that?

00:08:27.740 Would you debate me on the value to the individual of Scientology?

00:08:35.980 You better not,

00:08:37.380 because I'm going to win that debate.

00:08:42.260 Scientology is a lot of things,

00:08:44.540 and the criticisms about it,

00:08:46.440 you know, the Lear-Remini stuff,

00:08:47.940 I'm not talking about that.

00:08:50.200 So I'm not talking anything about the organization

00:08:52.920 and what it does or does not require its people to do

00:08:56.920 and what it does or does not do for revenge.

00:08:59.720 You know, that's all been well addressed.

00:09:01.720 So I'm not defending it or attacking it on those things.

00:09:05.960 Separate topic.

00:09:06.620 But, have you heard of this thing they do called auditing?

00:09:11.620 They hook you up to this little, I don't know,

00:09:14.060 galvanic response thing

00:09:16.120 and they ask you a bunch of questions

00:09:17.480 and allegedly you're going to find your,

00:09:20.660 some kind of traumas that you had when you were little

00:09:22.800 and then you resolve them

00:09:24.100 and then you're better.

00:09:25.420 Do you believe there's any science to that?

00:09:29.820 What do you think?

00:09:31.700 Do you think there's science to the auditing process?

00:09:37.220 Yes and no.

00:09:39.220 Yes and no.

00:09:41.280 It's basically hypnosis with a device.

00:09:44.920 And the device is what is convincing you with science.

00:09:48.000 So the point of the device

00:09:50.020 is to convince you that it's a legitimate process.

00:09:54.640 Suppose it does.

00:09:56.120 Suppose you are convinced that it's legitimate

00:09:58.120 because people pay for it

00:09:59.420 so they must think it's legitimate, they pay for it.

00:10:02.620 What would happen if you think it's legitimate

00:10:04.780 and you pay for it

00:10:07.040 thus convincing yourself

00:10:08.880 that it's confirmation bias and everything else?

00:10:11.900 So now you've talked yourself into it working

00:10:13.800 and then the process says

00:10:16.160 we found this trauma

00:10:17.340 and now we've removed it

00:10:19.320 and you're clear.

00:10:21.020 And then this process

00:10:22.340 which you believe is true

00:10:23.580 but let's say it's not

00:10:25.760 just for discussion.

00:10:27.900 What happens if you believe it's true?

00:10:30.920 What if you believe it made you happier?

00:10:36.140 You're happier.

00:10:37.840 Right?

00:10:38.180 There's no such thing as believing you're happy

00:10:39.940 and being wrong.

00:10:41.320 If you believe you're happy

00:10:42.460 yeah, you're happier.

00:10:43.360 So can hypnosis convince you

00:10:46.900 to have a different level of happiness?

00:10:50.360 Yes.

00:10:51.620 Do you know how it does that?

00:10:54.020 Do you know how a hypnotist

00:10:55.260 can make you less sad and more happy?

00:10:57.640 Now not if you have brain damage

00:10:59.080 or you have some real organic problem.

00:11:01.520 I'm not talking about the hard cases

00:11:02.900 but edge cases.

00:11:05.100 You know the people who are too tense,

00:11:06.440 too anxious,

00:11:07.180 that sort of thing.

00:11:08.160 You know they're in the gray area there.

00:11:10.340 They could be saved

00:11:11.260 but they just need a little help.

00:11:15.300 Believing it's going to work

00:11:16.400 is about half of the process.

00:11:18.740 So if you walk into a Scientology

00:11:20.600 auditing session

00:11:21.640 believing it's going to work

00:11:22.900 probably work.

00:11:25.820 As far as you can tell.

00:11:27.580 And that's the only thing that matters.

00:11:29.640 Subjectively,

00:11:30.140 if you walk out feeling better,

00:11:31.900 it worked.

00:11:33.700 It's only trying to work in your brain.

00:11:35.680 If it worked in your brain,

00:11:36.520 it works.

00:11:36.840 So everything I know about hypnosis

00:11:40.120 strongly suggests,

00:11:42.920 yeah, it might be a placebo effect,

00:11:44.420 you're right,

00:11:45.200 it strongly suggests

00:11:46.200 that the auditing

00:11:46.880 probably works

00:11:48.260 for some percentage of users.

00:11:50.800 I wouldn't say 100%.

00:11:51.940 Maybe 30%.

00:11:53.600 Wouldn't that be amazing?

00:11:55.980 I don't know if it's 30%.

00:11:57.200 That'd be my guess.

00:11:58.700 My guess is that auditing

00:12:00.060 works really well

00:12:01.180 30% of the people.

00:12:03.500 Just a guess.

00:12:04.940 Would you call that useful?

00:12:06.140 Well, that would be better

00:12:08.360 than a lot of drugs.

00:12:10.340 30%.

00:12:10.780 That'd be amazing.

00:12:12.380 If you could make 30% happy

00:12:14.340 when they were unhappy before,

00:12:17.560 that'd be amazing.

00:12:19.800 So it could be the placebo effect,

00:12:21.440 but that's just hypnosis, right?

00:12:23.880 You strengthen the placebo effect

00:12:26.920 by here's my machine,

00:12:29.300 here's my science,

00:12:30.340 here's all the people

00:12:31.020 who say it works.

00:12:32.640 Social endorsement.

00:12:34.140 So if you think that

00:12:38.040 Scientology doesn't work

00:12:40.460 in terms of making the people

00:12:42.720 who are doing it happier,

00:12:44.060 I think all the evidence

00:12:46.040 is against you.

00:12:47.840 If you say that it's not based

00:12:49.600 on actual science,

00:12:50.960 I'd say,

00:12:51.380 oh, well, that's true.

00:12:54.060 It doesn't mean it doesn't work

00:12:55.900 because actual science

00:12:58.000 also includes psychology, right?

00:12:59.760 If I can change your psychology,

00:13:03.520 I fixed you.

00:13:06.300 So if you think you're happy,

00:13:07.600 you're happy.

00:13:09.580 All right.

00:13:10.160 So Tom Cruise continues to be,

00:13:12.200 I don't know,

00:13:14.020 national treasure times two

00:13:16.040 or something.

00:13:16.720 How about this?

00:13:22.400 So I keep telling you

00:13:23.720 to follow a Twitter account

00:13:25.680 called Machiavelli's Underbelly.

00:13:28.100 Just search for it on Twitter,

00:13:29.940 you'll find it.

00:13:31.300 And this individual

00:13:34.840 behind that account

00:13:36.760 is deeply into the AI space

00:13:40.840 and tech space,

00:13:41.740 and so he does a lot of tweets

00:13:44.040 of things that are basically

00:13:45.800 your future.

00:13:47.480 If you want to know

00:13:48.380 what the future looks like,

00:13:49.660 follow this account

00:13:50.520 because he's maybe three years

00:13:53.780 ahead of where you are

00:13:54.700 in the actual technology

00:13:56.820 and three years

00:13:58.700 ahead of where I am as well,

00:14:00.080 and I pay attention to it

00:14:01.440 because he's deeply into it.

00:14:03.760 So one of the things

00:14:04.320 he's been doing

00:14:04.800 is asking the AI.

00:14:06.800 I think it's GPT something, right?

00:14:09.820 The AI he's using, I think.

00:14:11.480 And one of the things

00:14:14.440 they've found

00:14:14.960 was that the AI

00:14:16.020 knows the Adam's 25% theory.

00:14:20.540 AI knows

00:14:21.740 what the Adam's 25% theory is.

00:14:24.620 The idea that 25% of the public

00:14:27.060 gets every question wrong.

00:14:29.020 Different 25%, I think.

00:14:32.020 But roughly 25% of the public

00:14:33.840 will just get everything wrong,

00:14:35.340 no matter how easy

00:14:36.160 the question is.

00:14:37.500 And it turns out

00:14:38.200 that the AI knows that.

00:14:39.520 When asked,

00:14:40.900 what is the Adam's 25% theory,

00:14:44.260 it actually explained it

00:14:46.540 in detail, correctly.

00:14:49.720 It didn't use my words.

00:14:52.400 It explained it in detail

00:14:54.100 in its own words,

00:14:55.540 with examples.

00:14:56.800 It added examples.

00:14:58.960 It added its own examples.

00:15:02.800 Now, let me ask you this.

00:15:05.520 Does the AI now believe

00:15:09.420 the 25% is something

00:15:11.100 it should incorporate

00:15:12.880 in its thinking,

00:15:14.380 if you can call it thinking?

00:15:16.860 Did I program the AI accidentally?

00:15:21.100 Because can the AI tell that

00:15:22.900 I'm only a little bit serious

00:15:25.060 about this, right?

00:15:26.520 The 25% is just for fun.

00:15:29.380 It might actually be true,

00:15:31.100 but that's not really

00:15:31.720 the point of it.

00:15:32.760 The point of it is for fun.

00:15:34.000 And if I did this for fun,

00:15:38.900 how could the AI know

00:15:40.160 it's just for fun?

00:15:41.920 Will the AI start thinking

00:15:44.020 that it should take seriously

00:15:45.320 the 25%?

00:15:48.820 What if it does?

00:15:50.440 How does the AI know

00:15:51.600 when I'm kidding?

00:15:53.080 More importantly,

00:15:54.920 how credible does the AI

00:15:56.700 think I am?

00:15:57.740 And I'm going to ask it.

00:16:01.680 I'm going to ask it.

00:16:02.760 How credible am I

00:16:04.180 as a public figure?

00:16:06.860 I don't know what it's going to say

00:16:08.160 and how it is now.

00:16:12.060 Could it just say,

00:16:12.940 I don't know,

00:16:13.300 I can't do that.

00:16:14.660 That's subjective.

00:16:16.200 Maybe.

00:16:17.060 Or would it look at all the data

00:16:18.400 and say,

00:16:18.740 well, you've got this stuff wrong.

00:16:21.020 You've got this stuff right.

00:16:22.220 So that's a problem.

00:16:26.660 Now, suppose you went to the AI

00:16:29.480 and said,

00:16:30.160 is it important to have

00:16:31.520 passion for success?

00:16:35.320 Would the AI look at

00:16:37.000 all the billionaires who said,

00:16:38.280 yes, you need passion for success?

00:16:41.120 Warren Buffett said it.

00:16:43.120 Zuckerberg,

00:16:44.780 Virgin, CEO, Branson.

00:16:47.280 They all say that.

00:16:48.620 Passion is necessary for success.

00:16:50.320 But in my book,

00:16:52.560 How to Fail at Almost Everything

00:16:53.800 and Still Went Big,

00:16:55.320 I have a chapter in which I say

00:16:56.680 passion is bullshit.

00:16:59.140 And that passion is something

00:17:00.520 you get after you're successful.

00:17:02.320 You can be passionate about

00:17:03.280 anything that works.

00:17:05.640 So which would the AI say?

00:17:07.420 If you ask the AI,

00:17:09.180 is passion necessary,

00:17:10.380 would it just give you

00:17:11.140 the two different opinions?

00:17:13.100 Or would it pick one?

00:17:15.660 Because with that 25% thing,

00:17:17.820 it didn't really show

00:17:18.760 the alternative argument

00:17:20.260 did it.

00:17:21.100 It just showed my argument.

00:17:22.960 There was no alternative argument.

00:17:25.360 Because, you know,

00:17:26.100 it's just something I made up.

00:17:27.120 It's not really an argument.

00:17:29.440 So,

00:17:30.160 what does the AI decide?

00:17:32.720 Does the AI decide

00:17:33.620 that passion helps

00:17:34.420 or it doesn't?

00:17:35.660 And would it believe me

00:17:37.260 over those other people,

00:17:38.820 given that I gave my reason

00:17:40.040 why the other people

00:17:40.880 are not to be trusted?

00:17:42.020 I said,

00:17:43.620 you can't trust billionaires

00:17:44.620 because they're really

00:17:45.660 protecting their brand.

00:17:47.780 They don't want you to think

00:17:48.860 that they think

00:17:49.480 they're special.

00:17:51.240 Right?

00:17:51.680 It's just self-defense.

00:17:52.820 Would the AI know

00:17:53.960 that the billionaires

00:17:55.340 are lying

00:17:55.980 because they have

00:17:56.940 a reason to lie?

00:17:57.780 It's obvious why

00:17:58.440 they're lying.

00:17:59.380 Because they want you

00:18:00.140 to think that you

00:18:01.300 could be a billionaire too.

00:18:02.620 You just have to

00:18:03.280 get some passion.

00:18:04.560 Right?

00:18:04.940 They don't want to say,

00:18:05.740 well, we are smarter than you

00:18:07.220 and we started

00:18:07.760 with some advantages.

00:18:08.560 If they say that,

00:18:10.160 you're going to tax

00:18:10.680 their money away

00:18:11.240 because they didn't earn it.

00:18:12.640 If they say they're amazing,

00:18:14.700 then they get to

00:18:16.120 keep their money.

00:18:17.340 No, I did it

00:18:17.920 because I'm amazing.

00:18:19.340 I got passion.

00:18:20.340 You should do it too.

00:18:21.860 You could be a billionaire.

00:18:23.320 Get some passion.

00:18:24.540 What does the AI

00:18:25.260 make of that argument?

00:18:27.980 Well, I asked Panda Express

00:18:32.020 to, well, actually

00:18:33.500 I asked publicly

00:18:34.460 to find out

00:18:36.220 if the AI

00:18:38.800 could determine

00:18:39.680 what things are already

00:18:41.580 hoaxes in politics.

00:18:43.800 and Panda Express

00:18:45.560 weighed in here

00:18:46.620 and asked the AI

00:18:47.600 to list the main

00:18:49.500 hoaxes recently.

00:18:51.360 And here are the things

00:18:52.140 that AI thinks are hoaxes.

00:18:54.880 The 2016 presidential election.

00:18:59.200 AI believes it's a hoax

00:19:00.640 because there might have been

00:19:02.760 some Russian interference.

00:19:05.640 It thinks the election

00:19:06.920 was a hoax.

00:19:09.000 It also thinks

00:19:10.040 Pizzagate is a hoax.

00:19:11.460 Okay.

00:19:12.160 It thinks Seth Rich

00:19:13.180 conspiracy theories

00:19:14.800 are a hoax.

00:19:16.040 You might not agree,

00:19:17.620 but AI thinks it's a hoax.

00:19:19.100 So do I.

00:19:20.940 Russia collusion.

00:19:22.160 Got that one.

00:19:23.320 It got the Russia

00:19:23.940 collusion hoax correct.

00:19:25.940 Why did it get

00:19:26.820 the Russia collusion

00:19:27.680 hoax correct?

00:19:29.880 Could it be

00:19:30.640 that Brett Stevens

00:19:31.640 called it a hoax

00:19:33.100 in the New York Times

00:19:34.120 and the AI thought

00:19:35.760 that the New York Times

00:19:36.920 is sort of the,

00:19:38.380 you know,

00:19:39.100 the stamp of reality?

00:19:40.400 And so it said,

00:19:41.820 well,

00:19:42.080 if the New York Times

00:19:42.860 calls the Russia collusion

00:19:43.840 thing a hoax,

00:19:44.460 I guess we can call it a hoax.

00:19:46.240 Is that what it did?

00:19:47.620 I'm not saying it did.

00:19:48.880 I'm asking.

00:19:49.940 How does it come

00:19:50.720 to this opinion?

00:19:51.880 Who did it trust?

00:19:53.220 It also said

00:19:53.940 the Ukraine phone call

00:19:55.280 was a hoax.

00:19:57.840 So it's got

00:19:58.700 two things

00:19:59.900 that are pro-Trump,

00:20:01.380 agreeing that

00:20:02.080 Russia collusion

00:20:02.820 and the Ukraine

00:20:03.620 phone call

00:20:04.240 was a hoax.

00:20:05.680 And then three things

00:20:07.260 that would be

00:20:07.740 more supportive

00:20:08.580 of the Democrat view

00:20:09.960 of what is a hoax.

00:20:11.600 But it only listed

00:20:12.440 one, two, three, four,

00:20:13.100 five things.

00:20:14.680 If I gave the AI

00:20:16.640 my list of ten hoaxes,

00:20:21.180 which includes

00:20:21.840 some of these

00:20:22.300 but not all of them,

00:20:23.800 would the AI say,

00:20:24.840 oh, there's a good

00:20:25.440 list of hoaxes?

00:20:26.920 I will adopt that

00:20:28.180 in my thinking.

00:20:30.540 It might,

00:20:32.260 but it also might

00:20:33.240 be getting specific

00:20:34.240 about what it means

00:20:35.540 by a hoax.

00:20:36.640 Because people like me,

00:20:37.980 we use it sort of

00:20:38.640 generically as something

00:20:39.880 that is not true

00:20:41.340 and you knew it.

00:20:42.680 I don't know

00:20:43.040 if that's always a hoax.

00:20:47.000 So here's a question

00:20:48.200 that I want to,

00:20:49.560 oh, and then I asked,

00:20:50.740 I asked Panda Express,

00:20:56.260 it's a Twitter account,

00:20:57.420 you should be following

00:20:58.040 Panda Express too.

00:20:59.800 I asked it if the AI

00:21:01.400 thinks that the

00:21:02.120 fine people hoax

00:21:03.020 is a hoax.

00:21:03.680 And the AI

00:21:05.620 called bullshit

00:21:07.580 on the fine people hoax.

00:21:09.700 In other words,

00:21:10.140 it agreed it's a hoax.

00:21:11.980 The AI explained

00:21:13.500 very carefully

00:21:14.180 that Trump was

00:21:15.060 specifically

00:21:16.100 denouncing the neo-Nazis

00:21:18.440 and did not

00:21:19.880 call them fine people.

00:21:22.820 The AI

00:21:23.840 debunked the fine people hoax.

00:21:26.240 Now let's see what it can do

00:21:27.380 with the drinking bleach hoax.

00:21:28.600 Do you think it can get

00:21:31.980 the drinking bleach hoax?

00:21:33.400 Because the AI

00:21:34.300 should

00:21:35.160 be able to find

00:21:37.060 the news story

00:21:37.880 about the light therapy

00:21:39.280 that Trump was talking about.

00:21:41.640 It should be able

00:21:42.360 to look at his exact words

00:21:43.740 from the transcript

00:21:44.620 and it should be able

00:21:46.060 to match

00:21:46.600 his words

00:21:47.480 of light

00:21:48.040 as a disinfectant

00:21:49.340 to an actual technology

00:21:51.120 that was happening

00:21:51.820 and being tested

00:21:52.660 at the time.

00:21:55.060 It should be able

00:21:56.540 to call that out

00:21:57.300 as a hoax.

00:21:59.000 Now,

00:21:59.380 do you think that

00:22:00.080 the AI

00:22:02.420 would know

00:22:02.960 the fine people hoax

00:22:03.960 was a hoax

00:22:04.580 if I did not exist?

00:22:08.900 True question.

00:22:10.400 I want a serious answer to this.

00:22:12.240 If I did not exist,

00:22:14.340 would the AI

00:22:15.080 know that

00:22:15.720 the fine people thing

00:22:18.740 was a hoax?

00:22:22.780 I'm seeing no's

00:22:23.760 and yes's.

00:22:24.660 Now,

00:22:24.920 you do know

00:22:25.320 that there are other people

00:22:26.240 who fought very hard

00:22:27.560 to overcome that hoax.

00:22:29.760 Steve Cortez

00:22:30.800 just did

00:22:31.920 an amazing amount

00:22:32.760 of work,

00:22:33.260 created videos

00:22:34.040 debunking that thing.

00:22:35.660 Joel Pollack

00:22:36.340 also,

00:22:37.560 a lot of work

00:22:38.220 debunking it

00:22:39.080 tirelessly.

00:22:40.360 So we all did things.

00:22:43.480 But I might have been first

00:22:44.920 and I might have made it

00:22:47.940 a little easier

00:22:49.420 for the others.

00:22:51.000 I don't know

00:22:51.760 the answer to this,

00:22:52.700 but I think

00:22:54.320 I might have done that.

00:22:56.960 Maybe.

00:22:58.360 Don't know.

00:23:00.320 And

00:23:00.760 what if it was

00:23:04.600 an AI creation?

00:23:05.660 I don't know.

00:23:07.540 Give you some credit?

00:23:08.760 Okay,

00:23:09.040 you can all have

00:23:09.520 some credit too.

00:23:13.880 So then

00:23:14.540 I want to ask you this.

00:23:16.380 Are systems

00:23:17.380 better than goals?

00:23:20.080 What will AI say?

00:23:21.780 Will AI say

00:23:22.620 the systems

00:23:23.240 are better than goals?

00:23:24.140 And if it does,

00:23:27.520 where did it get that?

00:23:30.460 For me.

00:23:31.680 For me.

00:23:33.980 If you ask the AI,

00:23:35.520 is it good to have

00:23:36.780 a talent stack

00:23:37.660 versus, you know,

00:23:39.840 just being good

00:23:40.600 at one thing,

00:23:42.000 what's it going to say?

00:23:44.580 I think it will agree

00:23:45.760 with me.

00:23:47.520 Right?

00:23:47.700 If you ask AI,

00:23:49.580 what's a good way

00:23:50.380 to sort of,

00:23:51.940 you know,

00:23:52.260 get it to,

00:23:53.840 to solve couch lock,

00:23:56.480 you know,

00:23:56.680 where you just

00:23:57.040 can't get moving?

00:23:58.360 And it says,

00:23:59.080 well,

00:23:59.200 just do something small

00:24:00.380 and see if you can

00:24:01.160 build momentum.

00:24:03.220 Where would that

00:24:03.920 come from?

00:24:05.140 Well,

00:24:05.620 lots of people,

00:24:06.540 but partly me.

00:24:08.680 So,

00:24:09.380 here's a problem.

00:24:11.460 What happens if AI

00:24:14.020 is getting this

00:24:14.780 information from

00:24:15.660 people like me?

00:24:18.480 Is it really AI?

00:24:21.840 And how does it know

00:24:22.920 I'm credible?

00:24:25.240 Because what if the AI

00:24:26.440 says,

00:24:26.920 well,

00:24:27.400 let's say you ask

00:24:28.260 the question,

00:24:29.420 all right,

00:24:29.680 AI,

00:24:30.860 is Scott Adams

00:24:31.980 a credible public figure?

00:24:34.380 Doesn't mean I'm right

00:24:35.380 about everything.

00:24:36.080 Nobody's right about

00:24:36.800 everything.

00:24:37.380 That's for sure.

00:24:38.000 But am I credible?

00:24:40.060 Like,

00:24:40.200 am I saying things

00:24:41.220 that I believe to be true

00:24:42.740 and often have some backing?

00:24:45.620 What would it say?

00:24:46.900 Well,

00:24:47.240 the first thing it would do

00:24:48.040 is check its own knowledge,

00:24:49.380 wouldn't it?

00:24:50.420 It would ask,

00:24:51.400 how many things

00:24:52.000 do I believe are true

00:24:53.120 because I heard them

00:24:54.920 from this cartoonist guy?

00:24:57.920 And it's going to be

00:24:59.220 some major stuff.

00:25:02.240 Right?

00:25:03.160 If it knows

00:25:03.980 the systems are better

00:25:04.880 than goals

00:25:05.480 and talent stacks

00:25:06.940 are good

00:25:07.400 and passion is bullshit

00:25:08.520 and, you know,

00:25:10.360 half a dozen other things

00:25:11.380 that I've been teaching you,

00:25:14.240 I think the AI

00:25:16.000 is just me.

00:25:20.120 And I'm kind of serious

00:25:22.940 about this.

00:25:24.160 The AI is going to take

00:25:25.700 its cue

00:25:26.220 from some people

00:25:27.140 more than others.

00:25:28.520 How do you stop

00:25:29.180 that from happening?

00:25:30.780 Let me say this.

00:25:33.540 Will AI favor

00:25:35.440 clear writing?

00:25:38.100 I think it will.

00:25:40.440 I don't know that.

00:25:42.240 But I think it will.

00:25:44.660 I'm an unusually

00:25:45.880 clear communicator.

00:25:48.120 I'll make that statement

00:25:49.060 for argument's sake.

00:25:50.360 Will you,

00:25:50.780 do you buy that?

00:25:52.260 That just,

00:25:53.000 in terms of communication skill,

00:25:54.820 I'm professional grade.

00:25:56.900 Right?

00:25:57.180 I do it professionally.

00:25:58.640 So if I do it professionally,

00:26:01.080 would the AI

00:26:02.380 recognize that

00:26:03.280 my writing is clear

00:26:04.480 and have any kind

00:26:05.980 of a preference for it

00:26:07.080 because it's clear?

00:26:09.520 I don't know.

00:26:10.520 Maybe.

00:26:11.340 But that's a problem,

00:26:12.500 isn't it?

00:26:13.460 Because then you're,

00:26:14.140 then I'm programming

00:26:14.860 your AI.

00:26:17.860 How many things

00:26:18.800 do you think

00:26:19.220 I've influenced

00:26:20.040 in the real world?

00:26:21.800 Forget about AI

00:26:22.660 for a moment.

00:26:23.300 See if you can list,

00:26:27.120 you're going to get

00:26:27.840 different answers

00:26:29.800 on the locals' platform.

00:26:31.340 They know me

00:26:31.740 a little bit better.

00:26:33.180 But how many major

00:26:35.040 topics in the news

00:26:37.060 do you think

00:26:37.520 I had a substantial

00:26:39.100 impact on?

00:26:40.020 Do you think

00:26:42.080 I had an impact

00:26:42.800 on Trump's

00:26:43.780 original election?

00:26:47.760 Do you think

00:26:48.480 I had an impact

00:26:49.240 on the way

00:26:51.160 we see persuasion

00:26:52.300 versus facts?

00:26:54.180 Two movies

00:26:54.860 on one screen.

00:26:58.860 Do you think

00:26:59.560 I had an impact

00:27:00.340 on, let's say,

00:27:01.020 nuclear energy?

00:27:03.040 Or climate change?

00:27:07.080 Or

00:27:07.560 all right,

00:27:11.480 what are some things

00:27:12.460 you suspect

00:27:13.240 I influenced

00:27:14.180 but you're not sure?

00:27:15.740 Oh, this will be fun.

00:27:17.320 What are some things

00:27:18.180 in the headlines

00:27:18.760 that you suspect

00:27:19.740 I influenced

00:27:20.360 because they're things

00:27:20.920 you don't know about?

00:27:22.420 And they're pretty big.

00:27:24.580 And you probably

00:27:25.260 never know about them.

00:27:28.860 Immigration, no.

00:27:31.960 Telemedicine, yes.

00:27:32.760 The reason that you

00:27:33.500 can do telemedicine

00:27:34.480 across state lines

00:27:35.480 is me.

00:27:36.160 I made that happen.

00:27:38.460 I mean,

00:27:38.920 Trump did the

00:27:39.700 executive order

00:27:40.660 but it was

00:27:41.180 on my suggestion.

00:27:44.080 Yeah, my favorite

00:27:44.660 topic is me, right?

00:27:46.880 Fentanyl,

00:27:47.400 I don't know

00:27:47.760 that I had an impact

00:27:48.580 on fentanyl

00:27:49.140 except maybe

00:27:49.740 raising some

00:27:51.700 awareness.

00:27:54.620 The usage

00:27:55.300 of the word

00:27:55.740 hoax.

00:27:56.900 Maybe so.

00:27:57.980 I think

00:27:58.660 Cernovich was

00:27:59.340 more influential

00:28:00.420 on using

00:28:01.080 the word hoax.

00:28:02.540 He has a whole movie

00:28:03.340 called Hoax.

00:28:04.040 rogue doctors,

00:28:09.000 China decoupling.

00:28:10.240 Do you think

00:28:10.660 I had an influence

00:28:11.360 on decoupling

00:28:12.240 of China?

00:28:13.860 Or was it

00:28:14.620 just going to happen?

00:28:16.980 Do you think

00:28:17.700 I had an influence

00:28:18.460 on closing travel

00:28:19.940 to China

00:28:20.520 initially?

00:28:26.380 Does anybody

00:28:27.120 think I had an impact

00:28:28.120 on closing travel

00:28:29.300 to China

00:28:29.840 originally

00:28:30.340 when Trump

00:28:31.060 closed travel?

00:28:32.220 It's hard

00:28:36.000 to know.

00:28:38.600 Let me tell you

00:28:39.680 what I know

00:28:40.500 you literally

00:28:42.560 wouldn't believe.

00:28:44.400 You literally

00:28:45.240 wouldn't believe it.

00:28:48.340 Someday

00:28:48.780 you might know.

00:28:49.800 But a lot of people

00:28:50.660 are going to have

00:28:51.020 to die first.

00:28:51.960 And I think

00:28:52.400 I would die

00:28:52.780 before you find out.

00:28:55.180 All right.

00:28:56.140 Well,

00:28:56.680 I would worry

00:28:57.280 about AI

00:28:57.860 getting its

00:28:58.600 knowledge

00:28:59.780 from me.

00:29:00.480 so look out

00:29:04.000 for that.

00:29:08.320 Did you see

00:29:09.080 the Lee

00:29:10.040 Zelda

00:29:11.120 Lee Zeldin

00:29:12.180 attacked on stage?

00:29:14.440 So

00:29:14.880 Zeldin

00:29:15.600 is a

00:29:16.160 candidate

00:29:16.600 for governor

00:29:17.980 a Republican

00:29:18.520 candidate

00:29:18.920 for governor

00:29:19.420 in New York

00:29:19.920 right?

00:29:20.820 And he was

00:29:21.480 I'll say

00:29:22.220 attacked

00:29:22.760 but some

00:29:23.860 disturbed looking

00:29:24.720 person got on stage

00:29:26.020 and got his

00:29:26.440 hands on him

00:29:27.060 allegedly

00:29:28.020 he had a knife

00:29:28.900 but it must

00:29:30.540 have been

00:29:30.840 the tiniest

00:29:31.420 little knife

00:29:32.000 because it

00:29:32.320 was like

00:29:32.680 internal

00:29:33.260 to his fist.

00:29:35.000 It wasn't

00:29:35.600 a knife

00:29:36.020 was it?

00:29:36.940 Somebody

00:29:37.340 said a knife

00:29:37.980 but

00:29:38.280 it just

00:29:39.820 looked like

00:29:40.140 he had

00:29:40.300 a closed

00:29:40.740 fist

00:29:41.220 that didn't

00:29:41.720 oh somebody

00:29:42.380 says a razor

00:29:43.080 it was a

00:29:45.480 brass knife

00:29:48.440 I don't know

00:29:48.900 who knows

00:29:49.400 he may or

00:29:50.280 may not

00:29:50.620 have had

00:29:51.140 something

00:29:51.400 in his

00:29:51.640 hand

00:29:51.880 but I

00:29:53.060 would just

00:29:53.400 like to

00:29:53.760 call out

00:29:54.260 so Lee

00:29:56.040 Zeldin

00:29:56.460 Lee

00:30:00.480 Zeldin

00:30:00.920 did not

00:30:01.560 look

00:30:01.880 even a

00:30:02.600 little bit

00:30:02.940 bothered

00:30:03.260 by being

00:30:03.780 attacked

00:30:04.120 on stage

00:30:04.840 did you

00:30:06.380 see that?

00:30:09.000 You know

00:30:09.460 he

00:30:09.920 continued

00:30:10.600 talking

00:30:11.280 giving his

00:30:12.340 speech

00:30:12.640 as the

00:30:12.960 guy

00:30:13.080 comes

00:30:13.360 right up

00:30:13.720 to him

00:30:14.000 the guy

00:30:14.760 puts his

00:30:15.280 hands

00:30:16.040 on him

00:30:16.400 and starts

00:30:16.660 like

00:30:16.940 you know

00:30:17.360 and Lee

00:30:18.380 just grabs

00:30:19.000 the guy's

00:30:19.420 arm

00:30:19.740 you know

00:30:20.160 to protect

00:30:20.680 himself

00:30:20.980 from whatever

00:30:21.460 he had

00:30:21.700 in his

00:30:21.900 hand

00:30:22.260 and next

00:30:23.380 thing

00:30:24.000 you know

00:30:24.300 everybody's

00:30:24.780 climbing on

00:30:25.540 and pulling

00:30:26.200 Zeldin

00:30:27.260 off

00:30:27.540 but did

00:30:28.980 you see

00:30:29.340 how completely

00:30:30.240 unfazed

00:30:30.920 he was?

00:30:34.080 Talk about

00:30:34.780 somebody you

00:30:35.400 want to

00:30:35.660 have in

00:30:36.120 a pressure

00:30:37.180 situation

00:30:37.980 my god

00:30:40.380 oh is he

00:30:42.180 ex-military?

00:30:43.220 Is that

00:30:43.420 true?

00:30:46.080 Somebody

00:30:46.560 said ex-military

00:30:47.400 is that

00:30:47.800 true?

00:30:51.460 Somebody

00:30:51.940 says so

00:30:52.400 yeah

00:30:52.640 well that

00:30:54.620 would make

00:30:54.960 sense

00:30:55.340 I mean

00:30:55.800 yeah

00:30:56.760 okay

00:30:57.360 ex-military

00:30:58.200 there you

00:30:58.640 go

00:30:58.900 combat

00:30:59.480 veteran

00:30:59.880 because

00:31:02.800 you know

00:31:03.080 what it

00:31:03.260 looked like

00:31:04.180 Army

00:31:07.800 Reserve

00:31:08.260 okay

00:31:08.760 you know

00:31:10.280 what it

00:31:10.500 looked like

00:31:11.040 it looked

00:31:12.300 like he

00:31:12.660 thought he

00:31:12.980 could take

00:31:13.360 that guy

00:31:13.740 at the

00:31:13.940 moment

00:31:14.260 it looked

00:31:15.320 like he

00:31:15.640 thought he

00:31:15.920 could just

00:31:16.240 kill him

00:31:16.580 if he

00:31:16.820 needed to

00:31:17.340 like he

00:31:18.040 looked just

00:31:18.440 not worried

00:31:18.980 it was the

00:31:21.500 damnedest

00:31:21.900 thing

00:31:22.180 yeah

00:31:25.420 we'll see

00:31:28.680 you do

00:31:32.440 that you

00:31:32.780 freeze up

00:31:33.420 no bravery

00:31:34.140 it didn't

00:31:35.540 look like

00:31:35.900 he froze

00:31:36.260 up

00:31:36.640 didn't look

00:31:38.220 like he

00:31:38.520 froze up

00:31:38.940 at all

00:31:39.320 not all

00:31:42.840 military could

00:31:43.500 pull that

00:31:43.880 off

00:31:44.160 I know

00:31:44.520 since I'm

00:31:44.980 ex-military

00:31:45.480 yeah not

00:31:45.940 all military

00:31:46.480 could pull

00:31:46.780 that off

00:31:47.120 that's true

00:31:47.580 but it's

00:31:48.280 certainly

00:31:48.500 got to

00:31:48.760 help

00:31:48.980 is that

00:31:50.220 a picture

00:31:50.580 of the

00:31:50.820 actual

00:31:51.060 knife

00:31:51.800 no

00:31:52.320 it grabbed

00:31:53.780 his wrist

00:31:54.440 all right

00:31:56.440 well

00:31:56.760 anyway good

00:31:58.600 for him

00:31:59.020 but it's

00:31:59.740 more

00:32:00.020 more

00:32:00.780 Republicans

00:32:01.300 being

00:32:01.900 hunted

00:32:02.280 is anybody

00:32:03.980 doubting

00:32:04.460 my

00:32:04.820 what would

00:32:06.580 the AI

00:32:06.940 say

00:32:07.320 if you

00:32:08.260 ask the AI

00:32:09.140 are Republicans

00:32:10.080 being hunted

00:32:10.920 what would

00:32:14.480 it say

00:32:15.040 let's ask

00:32:16.680 it

00:32:16.920 are Republicans

00:32:18.240 being

00:32:18.800 you might say

00:32:20.160 targeted

00:32:20.640 or something

00:32:21.180 so that

00:32:21.940 because hunted

00:32:22.500 is hyperbolic

00:32:23.940 but I'd be

00:32:25.500 interested

00:32:25.840 I'd be

00:32:27.100 interested

00:32:27.400 did you

00:32:32.260 see the

00:32:32.540 video of

00:32:33.100 Josh Hawley

00:32:34.040 quote

00:32:34.700 fleeing the

00:32:35.480 capital

00:32:35.860 have you

00:32:38.220 seen those

00:32:38.820 they're really

00:32:39.980 hilarious

00:32:40.520 because

00:32:41.380 there's no

00:32:43.340 real

00:32:43.560 there's no

00:32:44.420 useful context

00:32:45.440 to it

00:32:45.940 we just

00:32:47.080 know that

00:32:47.520 being in

00:32:48.020 the capital

00:32:48.500 was a bad

00:32:49.080 idea

00:32:49.440 so if he

00:32:50.420 was walking

00:32:50.820 really fast

00:32:51.440 to get out

00:32:51.780 of it

00:32:51.980 but he's

00:32:52.980 sort of

00:32:53.220 scurrying

00:32:53.720 so they call

00:32:56.580 it fleeing

00:32:57.100 I just love

00:32:59.360 how they

00:32:59.680 say he's

00:33:00.620 fleeing

00:33:01.000 so he got

00:33:02.780 people riled

00:33:03.360 up and then

00:33:03.820 he fled

00:33:04.260 or fled

00:33:05.600 anyway

00:33:08.860 I don't know

00:33:09.860 is there any

00:33:10.300 story that

00:33:10.880 YouTube is

00:33:12.920 asking if

00:33:13.460 I'm high

00:33:13.920 unfortunately

00:33:15.600 no

00:33:16.040 I'm not

00:33:17.600 this is my

00:33:19.000 actual

00:33:19.320 personality

00:33:19.980 I know

00:33:21.400 shocking

00:33:21.940 yeah scurry

00:33:23.840 is a fun

00:33:24.340 word

00:33:24.660 skedaddle

00:33:25.900 he skedaddled

00:33:27.480 there's no

00:33:28.820 story to it

00:33:29.520 it's just that

00:33:30.000 it's funny that

00:33:30.580 he walked

00:33:31.640 fast leaving

00:33:32.440 so it looks

00:33:32.900 like he was

00:33:33.360 fleeing

00:33:33.820 he was

00:33:35.200 fleeing

00:33:35.520 but it's

00:33:35.860 just funny

00:33:36.300 here's something

00:33:38.040 I didn't know

00:33:38.640 did you know

00:33:39.400 that Pence

00:33:40.680 staged a

00:33:41.760 coup

00:33:42.420 on January

00:33:43.560 6th

00:33:45.620 according to

00:33:48.540 the Washington

00:33:48.880 Post

00:33:49.660 now

00:33:52.340 I heard

00:33:53.500 somebody

00:33:53.780 I saw

00:33:54.360 on Twitter

00:33:54.900 the accuracy

00:33:56.560 of the

00:33:56.920 reporting

00:33:57.400 which is

00:33:58.340 fair

00:33:58.600 but

00:33:59.600 according to

00:34:00.220 the Washington

00:34:00.580 Post

00:34:00.920 Pence

00:34:01.740 overthrew the

00:34:02.380 country

00:34:02.680 and he was

00:34:03.360 giving orders

00:34:03.840 to the

00:34:04.160 military

00:34:04.580 and the

00:34:05.500 military

00:34:05.760 was following

00:34:06.380 him

00:34:06.580 on January

00:34:07.080 6th

00:34:07.720 I don't

00:34:09.900 think that

00:34:10.220 happened

00:34:10.620 right

00:34:11.500 anyway

00:34:17.080 so yeah

00:34:17.900 maybe

00:34:18.180 maybe Pence

00:34:18.860 overthrew the

00:34:19.420 country

00:34:19.700 one of the

00:34:22.340 things we're

00:34:22.660 hearing is

00:34:23.100 that Trump

00:34:24.020 didn't

00:34:24.660 care about

00:34:25.860 the safety

00:34:26.520 of Pence

00:34:27.200 under the

00:34:28.800 situation

00:34:29.280 that Pence

00:34:29.680 wasn't doing

00:34:30.200 what Trump

00:34:30.780 wanted

00:34:31.100 apparently

00:34:31.500 what do you

00:34:32.600 think of that

00:34:33.000 do you think

00:34:33.340 that's a fair

00:34:33.980 characterization

00:34:34.680 that Trump

00:34:36.280 wasn't worried

00:34:37.480 about the

00:34:38.820 safety of

00:34:39.380 Pence

00:34:39.800 because he

00:34:42.440 didn't do

00:34:42.780 anything about

00:34:43.320 it

00:34:43.560 now is there

00:34:45.860 anybody else's

00:34:46.840 safety

00:34:47.280 that Trump

00:34:49.180 we have on

00:34:50.400 record

00:34:50.820 in which he

00:34:52.740 wasn't worried

00:34:53.340 about that

00:34:53.900 person's safety

00:34:54.760 who would that

00:34:55.240 be

00:34:55.500 there was one

00:34:57.320 other person

00:34:57.900 that Trump

00:34:58.400 named that he

00:34:58.980 wasn't worried

00:34:59.480 about

00:34:59.780 now we

00:35:00.880 don't have

00:35:01.140 to read

00:35:01.400 his mind

00:35:01.780 because he

00:35:02.120 said it

00:35:02.420 out loud

00:35:02.900 himself

00:35:04.920 can I add

00:35:07.360 a fucking

00:35:07.740 in the middle

00:35:08.140 of that

00:35:08.420 him fucking

00:35:09.300 self

00:35:09.740 how about a

00:35:11.660 little context

00:35:12.280 please

00:35:12.700 Trump wasn't

00:35:14.720 worried about

00:35:15.240 his own

00:35:15.680 physical safety

00:35:16.820 why

00:35:17.300 why

00:35:18.820 well he said

00:35:20.520 they weren't

00:35:20.820 there to hurt

00:35:21.280 him

00:35:21.420 that's one

00:35:21.900 thing

00:35:22.160 but why is

00:35:23.140 the other

00:35:23.400 reason

00:35:23.760 probably because

00:35:25.340 he thought it

00:35:25.720 was important

00:35:26.340 and that his

00:35:27.580 physical safety

00:35:28.400 wasn't the

00:35:28.940 main criteria

00:35:29.760 to worry

00:35:30.300 about at

00:35:30.740 that moment

00:35:31.320 maybe

00:35:32.720 don't know

00:35:33.720 we don't know

00:35:34.880 what he was

00:35:35.180 thinking right

00:35:35.620 this would be

00:35:36.120 mind reading

00:35:36.540 but maybe

00:35:37.680 Trump was

00:35:38.640 thinking that

00:35:39.400 putting Pence

00:35:40.840 at risk

00:35:41.480 was the

00:35:41.880 right play

00:35:42.380 given that

00:35:47.680 he believed

00:35:48.460 the election

00:35:49.520 was stolen

00:35:50.060 was he wrong

00:35:50.780 well his

00:35:52.600 assumption

00:35:53.000 might have

00:35:53.340 been wrong

00:35:53.720 about the

00:35:54.360 election

00:35:54.680 but if

00:35:56.340 you believed

00:35:56.900 he was

00:35:57.280 right about

00:35:57.800 the election

00:35:58.280 and he

00:35:58.700 thought he

00:35:59.000 was right

00:35:59.420 and it

00:35:59.680 was obvious

00:36:00.080 and you

00:36:01.000 know soon

00:36:01.480 everybody

00:36:01.840 would know

00:36:02.200 he's right

00:36:02.580 under those

00:36:03.140 assumptions

00:36:03.560 which have

00:36:04.240 not been

00:36:04.580 validated

00:36:05.060 under those

00:36:06.720 assumptions

00:36:07.140 putting a

00:36:07.740 little bit

00:36:08.080 of risk

00:36:08.640 physical risk

00:36:09.720 on Pence

00:36:10.300 to get him

00:36:11.640 to maybe

00:36:12.120 do the

00:36:12.520 right thing

00:36:13.260 wasn't the

00:36:14.920 wrong play

00:36:15.480 it might be

00:36:17.220 the wrong

00:36:17.520 assumption

00:36:17.940 that the

00:36:20.280 election was

00:36:20.800 rigged

00:36:21.560 might be

00:36:22.040 but it

00:36:23.500 wasn't the

00:36:23.960 wrong play

00:36:24.660 to say

00:36:25.040 that both

00:36:25.400 the president

00:36:25.920 and the

00:36:26.360 vice president

00:36:27.000 should take

00:36:28.060 on some

00:36:28.460 physical risk

00:36:29.400 just like

00:36:30.920 the protesters

00:36:31.860 were

00:36:32.220 we do live

00:36:34.400 in a country

00:36:35.000 where fuck

00:36:37.220 around and

00:36:37.700 find out

00:36:38.260 is our

00:36:38.860 operating

00:36:39.340 system

00:36:39.840 am I

00:36:41.800 wrong

00:36:42.080 that's

00:36:43.560 basically

00:36:43.980 the entire

00:36:44.640 constitution

00:36:45.560 in one

00:36:46.200 sentence

00:36:46.660 it's one

00:36:47.800 sentence

00:36:48.480 fuck around

00:36:49.640 and find out

00:36:50.300 that's the

00:36:51.180 whole constitution

00:36:51.820 we just

00:36:52.300 formalized it

00:36:53.460 basically

00:36:53.820 so

00:36:55.200 in a

00:36:57.040 situation

00:36:57.580 in which

00:36:58.260 Dinesh

00:36:59.120 D'Souza

00:36:59.540 asked this

00:37:00.000 question

00:37:00.300 perfectly

00:37:00.760 today

00:37:01.160 he said

00:37:02.700 he said

00:37:04.740 the only

00:37:05.100 relevant

00:37:05.480 question

00:37:05.940 regarding

00:37:06.380 January 6

00:37:07.180 is

00:37:08.240 how are

00:37:08.980 people

00:37:10.640 supposed to

00:37:11.300 behave

00:37:11.680 when they're

00:37:12.960 convinced

00:37:13.520 the election

00:37:14.260 was stolen

00:37:14.820 what is

00:37:16.120 the reasonable

00:37:16.760 conduct

00:37:17.260 under those

00:37:18.060 circumstances

00:37:18.700 that's a

00:37:20.440 good

00:37:20.600 question

00:37:21.040 how should

00:37:22.440 you act

00:37:22.940 if you're

00:37:23.440 sure the

00:37:24.020 election

00:37:24.300 was stolen

00:37:24.800 you might

00:37:25.300 be wrong

00:37:25.760 but how

00:37:26.680 should you

00:37:27.040 act

00:37:27.420 calm

00:37:29.220 I don't know

00:37:32.180 but I

00:37:35.320 had to

00:37:35.640 criticize

00:37:36.100 Dinesh

00:37:36.580 over this

00:37:37.020 even though

00:37:37.400 I love

00:37:38.260 the question

00:37:38.760 it's definitely

00:37:40.240 a relevant

00:37:40.960 question

00:37:41.440 how are you

00:37:42.740 supposed to

00:37:43.340 act if you

00:37:43.960 genuinely believe

00:37:45.000 the election

00:37:45.880 was rigged

00:37:46.520 how are you

00:37:47.640 supposed to

00:37:48.380 act

00:37:48.620 what would

00:37:49.280 be the

00:37:49.580 ideal way

00:37:50.260 for a

00:37:50.640 patriot

00:37:50.980 to act

00:37:51.580 under those

00:37:52.260 situations

00:37:52.840 the

00:37:54.660 January 6

00:37:55.400 event

00:37:55.740 that's how

00:37:56.520 again

00:37:58.240 not condoning

00:37:59.000 violence

00:37:59.520 but a

00:38:03.680 protest

00:38:04.140 yeah

00:38:04.720 yeah

00:38:05.780 surround

00:38:06.780 the

00:38:07.020 capital

00:38:07.400 shut it

00:38:08.200 down

00:38:08.480 stop the

00:38:09.660 process

00:38:10.180 yep

00:38:10.780 yeah that's

00:38:11.660 exactly how

00:38:12.320 you should

00:38:12.620 act

00:38:12.940 if you

00:38:13.960 believe

00:38:14.480 the republic

00:38:16.060 is in

00:38:16.420 danger

00:38:16.720 if you're

00:38:18.740 wrong

00:38:19.020 I think

00:38:20.860 you have to

00:38:21.200 fess up to

00:38:21.720 it

00:38:21.920 you know

00:38:22.600 you gotta

00:38:22.940 face the

00:38:23.720 music

00:38:23.980 unfortunately

00:38:24.500 you have

00:38:25.100 to

00:38:25.260 but yeah

00:38:26.700 that's how

00:38:27.000 you should

00:38:27.220 act

00:38:27.420 but here's

00:38:28.100 my

00:38:28.400 problem

00:38:29.000 with

00:38:29.440 Dinesh's

00:38:30.420 opening

00:38:32.200 sentence

00:38:32.660 he says

00:38:33.080 the only

00:38:33.400 relevant

00:38:33.780 question

00:38:34.160 is

00:38:34.460 how are

00:38:35.300 people

00:38:35.560 supposed

00:38:35.920 to

00:38:36.080 act

00:38:36.320 that's

00:38:37.240 really

00:38:37.460 close

00:38:37.980 the

00:38:38.840 relevant

00:38:39.180 question

00:38:39.640 is

00:38:39.980 what

00:38:40.360 did

00:38:40.580 they

00:38:40.740 believe

00:38:41.180 at

00:38:41.360 the

00:38:41.480 time

00:38:41.760 and

00:38:43.340 we're

00:38:43.500 not

00:38:43.820 we're

00:38:44.160 not

00:38:44.340 really

00:38:44.800 dealing

00:38:45.260 with

00:38:45.480 that

00:38:45.660 in

00:38:45.760 the

00:38:45.820 way

00:38:45.960 we

00:38:46.120 should

00:38:46.420 the

00:38:47.420 January

00:38:48.100 6

00:38:48.500 thing

00:38:48.780 has

00:38:49.160 not

00:38:49.560 shown

00:38:49.860 any

00:38:50.200 evidence

00:38:50.660 that

00:38:51.340 Trump

00:38:51.600 believed

00:38:52.240 he

00:38:52.440 lost

00:38:52.940 none

00:38:53.700 no

00:38:55.000 evidence

00:38:55.380 the

00:38:55.760 closest

00:38:56.180 they

00:38:56.460 came

00:38:56.820 is

00:38:57.640 if

00:38:57.880 they

00:38:58.040 can

00:38:58.240 convince

00:38:58.600 you that

00:38:58.960 the word

00:38:59.280 find

00:38:59.900 means

00:39:00.880 something

00:39:01.260 different

00:39:01.620 than it

00:39:02.020 has always

00:39:02.440 meaned in the

00:39:03.060 English language

00:39:03.860 until Trump

00:39:04.820 used it that

00:39:05.460 day

00:39:05.720 that's it

00:39:07.320 that's it

00:39:09.000 that we have to

00:39:10.960 define a word

00:39:11.660 to mean what it

00:39:12.300 doesn't mean in any

00:39:14.020 other context

00:39:14.760 that's it

00:39:16.080 so

00:39:17.200 so

00:39:17.220 if we

00:39:18.620 if we walk

00:39:19.420 past the

00:39:19.940 real question

00:39:20.480 to the

00:39:20.840 sale

00:39:21.180 you know

00:39:22.420 Dinesh's

00:39:22.980 question

00:39:23.320 how are we

00:39:23.800 supposed to

00:39:24.180 act

00:39:24.400 is already

00:39:24.800 thinking past

00:39:25.420 the sale

00:39:25.860 the sale

00:39:27.420 is what

00:39:28.740 did they

00:39:29.120 believe

00:39:29.540 you got to

00:39:30.740 go back

00:39:31.020 to the

00:39:31.320 first

00:39:31.600 question

00:39:32.100 what did

00:39:33.160 they

00:39:33.320 believe

00:39:33.720 and

00:39:34.620 every bit

00:39:35.280 of evidence

00:39:35.840 every bit

00:39:36.740 of evidence

00:39:37.240 suggests

00:39:37.760 that

00:39:38.200 everybody

00:39:38.640 involved

00:39:39.240 believes

00:39:40.380 the

00:39:40.660 election

00:39:41.300 was

00:39:41.720 sketchy

00:39:42.480 we now

00:39:45.060 know

00:39:45.360 that

00:39:45.880 Democrats

00:39:46.320 are coming

00:39:46.880 to that

00:39:47.280 opinion

00:39:47.580 in large

00:39:48.580 numbers

00:39:49.000 the number

00:39:49.860 of Democrats

00:39:50.560 who believe

00:39:51.060 elections

00:39:51.560 are now

00:39:52.580 credible

00:39:53.200 and reliable

00:39:54.480 is way

00:39:56.020 down

00:39:56.420 from

00:39:58.000 a year

00:39:58.680 ago

00:39:58.940 and the

00:39:59.960 January 6th

00:40:00.680 thing is

00:40:00.940 probably part

00:40:01.700 of that

00:40:01.980 that's my

00:40:02.400 guess

00:40:02.700 it's lowering

00:40:04.100 everybody's

00:40:05.200 understanding

00:40:06.580 of the safety

00:40:07.240 of the election

00:40:07.820 all right

00:40:10.640 Adam

00:40:11.740 Kinzinger

00:40:12.340 who you

00:40:13.140 know

00:40:13.480 is a

00:40:14.000 I guess

00:40:14.340 you would

00:40:14.580 call him

00:40:14.880 a rhino

00:40:15.420 he's a

00:40:16.540 Republican

00:40:17.000 but you

00:40:17.600 don't think

00:40:18.000 he's

00:40:18.200 Republican

00:40:18.600 enough

00:40:19.080 and he's

00:40:20.080 on this

00:40:20.460 January 6th

00:40:21.420 committee

00:40:21.660 because

00:40:22.400 he's so

00:40:23.520 not Republican

00:40:24.320 the Democrats

00:40:25.120 were happy

00:40:25.560 to have him

00:40:26.140 but he

00:40:28.520 tells the story

00:40:29.180 of being

00:40:29.500 hunkered down

00:40:30.120 in his office

00:40:30.740 during the

00:40:31.440 January 6th

00:40:32.080 protest

00:40:32.440 afraid that

00:40:33.120 the protesters

00:40:33.700 would get

00:40:34.180 to him

00:40:34.540 and apparently

00:40:35.460 they had

00:40:35.880 threatened

00:40:36.200 to kill him

00:40:36.780 you know

00:40:37.580 on Twitter

00:40:38.020 and other

00:40:38.600 places

00:40:38.880 so he

00:40:39.280 had a real

00:40:40.160 reason to be

00:40:40.700 worried

00:40:41.000 so apparently

00:40:42.400 he had a

00:40:42.940 weapon

00:40:43.540 now he

00:40:44.640 is ex-military

00:40:45.520 so when

00:40:47.160 ex-military

00:40:47.900 has a

00:40:48.620 legal firearm

00:40:49.700 the first

00:40:50.280 thing I say

00:40:50.800 is oh

00:40:51.320 that's exactly

00:40:52.800 who I want

00:40:53.340 to have a

00:40:53.680 legal firearm

00:40:54.380 ex-military

00:40:55.680 but there

00:40:57.780 is a thing

00:40:58.220 called a

00:40:58.640 red flag

00:40:59.380 law

00:41:00.060 I don't

00:41:00.520 know if

00:41:00.740 it applies

00:41:01.280 does DC

00:41:02.340 have a

00:41:02.720 red flag

00:41:03.100 law

00:41:03.340 for guns

00:41:04.440 can somebody

00:41:07.360 give me a

00:41:08.060 quote

00:41:08.440 fact check

00:41:09.240 on that

00:41:09.640 if the

00:41:11.760 red flag

00:41:12.260 law meaning

00:41:12.780 that if

00:41:13.140 somebody owns

00:41:13.680 a gun

00:41:13.980 or tries

00:41:14.480 to get

00:41:14.800 one

00:41:15.060 and they

00:41:15.640 have

00:41:15.840 obvious

00:41:16.420 some

00:41:17.120 mental

00:41:17.580 issues

00:41:18.120 that you

00:41:19.420 there's

00:41:22.900 no guns

00:41:23.460 all right

00:41:27.540 so here's

00:41:28.140 the question

00:41:28.540 do you

00:41:29.800 think that

00:41:30.220 Adam Kinzinger

00:41:30.980 should be

00:41:31.620 allowed to

00:41:32.140 own a

00:41:32.640 firearm

00:41:33.020 if you're

00:41:34.980 a second

00:41:35.380 amendment

00:41:35.720 absolutist

00:41:36.500 then yes

00:41:37.240 so the

00:41:38.940 question is

00:41:39.420 I guess I

00:41:40.120 should change

00:41:40.560 the question

00:41:41.020 let me alter

00:41:42.160 the question

00:41:42.660 because the

00:41:43.560 pro-gun people

00:41:44.220 are just going

00:41:44.700 to say yes

00:41:45.200 and that's

00:41:46.000 the end of

00:41:46.280 the conversation

00:41:46.860 which is fine

00:41:47.740 by the way

00:41:48.140 if your

00:41:49.460 opinion is

00:41:50.440 yes absolute

00:41:51.220 I respect

00:41:52.980 that

00:41:53.360 I mean

00:41:54.100 there's some

00:41:54.580 problems

00:41:55.000 that's not a

00:41:56.460 clean solution

00:41:57.340 clearly

00:41:58.320 but I can

00:42:00.000 respect it

00:42:00.760 I might not

00:42:01.360 agree with

00:42:01.860 it

00:42:02.100 completely

00:42:03.220 but I

00:42:04.380 respect that

00:42:04.920 opinion

00:42:05.160 I just

00:42:08.260 want to

00:42:08.580 point out

00:42:09.000 that if

00:42:09.460 there's

00:42:09.680 somebody

00:42:09.960 who has

00:42:10.280 a mental

00:42:11.040 disability

00:42:11.800 it's

00:42:12.800 Adam

00:42:13.080 Kinzinger

00:42:13.560 meaning

00:42:14.780 that if

00:42:15.300 the red

00:42:15.660 flag laws

00:42:16.320 are designed

00:42:16.860 for a

00:42:17.440 citizen

00:42:17.820 to say

00:42:18.320 I'm just

00:42:19.940 a citizen

00:42:20.420 I'm no

00:42:20.800 doctor

00:42:21.220 but my

00:42:23.080 friend or

00:42:23.560 my relative

00:42:24.080 is acting

00:42:24.740 in a way

00:42:25.100 that you

00:42:25.560 need to

00:42:26.000 take a

00:42:26.380 look at

00:42:26.660 this

00:42:26.960 that's

00:42:28.460 what I'm

00:42:28.740 going to

00:42:28.900 call out

00:42:29.260 for Adam

00:42:29.680 Kinzinger

00:42:30.100 I'm just

00:42:31.440 a friend

00:42:31.880 or a

00:42:32.220 relative

00:42:32.520 he doesn't

00:42:33.760 look stable

00:42:34.400 am I

00:42:36.220 wrong

00:42:36.480 again we're

00:42:38.200 not experts

00:42:38.840 we can't

00:42:39.420 diagnose his

00:42:40.700 mental health

00:42:41.280 we're not

00:42:41.620 doing that

00:42:42.020 so this is

00:42:42.840 not a

00:42:43.120 diagnosis

00:42:43.580 I'm telling

00:42:44.800 you my

00:42:45.140 impression

00:42:45.640 if I saw

00:42:46.340 that somebody

00:42:46.800 like him

00:42:47.520 owned a

00:42:48.340 firearm

00:42:48.780 I would

00:42:49.760 start to

00:42:50.240 think red

00:42:50.640 flag

00:42:51.220 seriously

00:42:52.100 that's not

00:42:53.020 a joke

00:42:53.420 when he

00:42:54.980 talks he

00:42:55.660 looks mentally

00:42:56.340 disturbed

00:42:56.960 to me

00:42:57.760 to me he

00:42:59.360 looks mentally

00:42:59.880 disturbed

00:43:00.380 now that

00:43:01.460 could be a

00:43:01.920 result of

00:43:02.320 his service

00:43:02.860 I can't

00:43:05.260 imagine you

00:43:05.720 could go

00:43:06.040 through

00:43:06.360 did he go

00:43:07.300 through combat

00:43:07.820 I think he

00:43:08.340 did

00:43:08.540 I can't

00:43:09.500 imagine that

00:43:09.940 you could go

00:43:10.240 through combat

00:43:10.780 and come out

00:43:11.280 okay

00:43:11.600 I'm sure I

00:43:13.400 wouldn't

00:43:14.020 I feel I'm

00:43:14.780 pretty mentally

00:43:15.620 strong compared

00:43:17.060 to say the

00:43:17.620 average

00:43:18.020 but I

00:43:18.820 don't think

00:43:19.120 I could

00:43:19.400 go through

00:43:19.820 combat

00:43:20.560 like I

00:43:22.180 know myself

00:43:22.740 well enough

00:43:23.140 that I

00:43:23.480 wouldn't

00:43:23.740 I wouldn't

00:43:24.220 be the

00:43:24.500 same person

00:43:24.980 on the

00:43:25.240 other side

00:43:25.600 of that

00:43:25.880 so why

00:43:27.420 do we

00:43:27.640 assume other

00:43:28.040 people do

00:43:28.560 add the

00:43:31.880 small man

00:43:32.380 complex

00:43:32.940 you mean

00:43:33.240 Kinzinger

00:43:33.660 or me

00:43:34.560 who are you

00:43:35.300 talking about

00:43:35.960 all right

00:43:38.400 are you sure

00:43:39.780 you're not

00:43:40.160 looking in

00:43:40.620 the mirror

00:43:41.020 no I'm

00:43:43.180 not I'm

00:43:43.780 not sure

00:43:44.120 that

00:43:44.420 that's

00:43:45.260 always

00:43:45.480 the

00:43:45.740 you know

00:43:46.560 the larger

00:43:47.180 context

00:43:47.660 for everything

00:43:48.240 I do

00:43:48.680 is when

00:43:49.660 you ask

00:43:50.000 me if

00:43:50.460 I'm sure

00:43:50.880 I'm not

00:43:51.260 the one

00:43:51.580 who's

00:43:51.880 suffering

00:43:52.380 confirmation

00:43:53.020 bias

00:43:53.420 my answer

00:43:54.520 should always

00:43:55.000 be no

00:43:55.460 I'm not

00:43:56.580 sure

00:43:56.800 of that

00:43:57.140 and when

00:43:57.820 people say

00:43:58.240 to you

00:43:58.520 to me

00:43:58.940 Scott

00:43:59.320 you're

00:44:00.200 accusing

00:44:00.500 somebody

00:44:00.880 of cognitive

00:44:01.460 dissonance

00:44:02.460 how do

00:44:03.360 you know

00:44:03.640 you're not

00:44:04.100 the one

00:44:04.440 with cognitive

00:44:05.140 dissonance

00:44:05.800 and my

00:44:06.420 answer

00:44:06.700 should be

00:44:07.260 if I'm

00:44:07.840 being honest

00:44:08.360 I don't

00:44:09.360 I don't

00:44:10.880 the only

00:44:12.140 thing I

00:44:12.420 know for

00:44:12.740 sure

00:44:13.020 sometimes

00:44:14.580 is that

00:44:15.600 one person

00:44:16.060 has a

00:44:16.380 trigger

00:44:16.740 and the

00:44:17.280 other one

00:44:17.540 doesn't

00:44:18.280 you know

00:44:19.220 a trigger

00:44:19.720 might tell

00:44:20.180 you who

00:44:20.480 has the

00:44:20.780 cognitive

00:44:21.100 dissonance

00:44:21.700 but it's

00:44:22.720 hard to

00:44:22.980 tell

00:44:23.120 otherwise

00:44:23.540 Eugene

00:44:29.200 Sledge

00:44:29.620 said

00:44:29.840 anyone

00:44:30.100 that's

00:44:30.460 over

00:44:30.620 100

00:44:30.860 yards

00:44:31.200 away

00:44:31.400 from

00:44:31.520 the

00:44:31.680 front

00:44:31.960 can't

00:44:32.420 understand

00:44:32.900 combat

00:44:33.520 that

00:44:34.980 sounds

00:44:35.280 right

00:44:35.580 combat

00:44:38.380 messes

00:44:38.780 you up

00:44:39.000 unless

00:44:39.220 you're

00:44:39.380 a

00:44:39.500 psychopath

00:44:39.900 yeah

00:44:42.420 I guess

00:44:42.980 that would

00:44:43.200 be a

00:44:43.440 plus

00:44:43.700 wouldn't

00:44:43.940 it

00:44:44.540 all

00:44:46.480 right

00:44:46.660 let's

00:44:49.180 see

00:44:49.280 what else

00:44:49.640 is

00:44:49.760 happening

00:44:50.060 oh

00:44:50.460 apparently

00:44:51.500 nothing

00:44:51.800 so

00:44:52.820 we've

00:44:53.220 gotten

00:44:55.220 to the

00:44:55.520 end

00:44:55.720 here

00:44:55.940 and

00:44:56.160 so

00:44:56.760 Joe

00:44:57.000 Biden

00:44:57.240 has

00:44:57.560 COVID

00:44:57.880 I

00:44:59.040 don't

00:44:59.160 know

00:44:59.300 that

00:44:59.460 there's

00:44:59.620 much

00:44:59.820 to say

00:45:00.080 about

00:45:00.280 that

00:45:00.660 yeah

00:45:05.400 I

00:45:06.460 think

00:45:07.960 we

00:45:08.100 should

00:45:08.320 quit

00:45:08.600 the

00:45:08.900 Pete

00:45:09.920 Buttigieg

00:45:10.660 is

00:45:12.000 gay

00:45:12.400 jokes

00:45:12.920 I'm

00:45:14.680 not

00:45:14.820 sure

00:45:14.960 that's

00:45:15.140 worth

00:45:15.360 a

00:45:15.540 meme

00:45:15.840 you know

00:45:18.320 we're

00:45:18.920 free

00:45:19.180 speech

00:45:19.600 over

00:45:19.900 on

00:45:20.600 the

00:45:20.880 locals

00:45:22.400 platform

00:45:22.880 so

00:45:23.140 you're

00:45:23.720 not

00:45:23.820 going

00:45:23.980 to get

00:45:24.180 booted

00:45:24.680 off

00:45:24.940 for

00:45:25.140 like

00:45:26.800 a

00:45:26.940 distasteful

00:45:27.600 joke

00:45:27.980 but

00:45:28.640 can't

00:45:29.940 we

00:45:30.060 find

00:45:30.240 something

00:45:30.520 else

00:45:30.760 to

00:45:30.860 make

00:45:31.000 fun

00:45:31.220 of

00:45:31.420 I

00:45:32.700 mean

00:45:32.880 do

00:45:33.180 we

00:45:33.300 really

00:45:33.760 have

00:45:33.960 to

00:45:34.080 make

00:45:34.360 fun

00:45:34.620 of

00:45:34.820 Pete

00:45:35.200 Buttigieg

00:45:35.680 for

00:45:36.020 being

00:45:36.240 rear-ended

00:45:36.820 and

00:45:37.740 you know

00:45:38.100 haha

00:45:38.440 he's

00:45:39.560 gay

00:45:39.780 he got

00:45:40.100 rear-ended

00:45:40.600 I mean

00:45:41.760 if it

00:45:41.980 were

00:45:42.080 funny

00:45:42.680 maybe

00:45:43.100 I'd

00:45:43.420 be a

00:45:44.420 little

00:45:44.520 more

00:45:44.720 in

00:45:44.860 favor

00:45:45.080 of

00:45:45.260 it

00:45:45.440 just

00:45:45.920 because

00:45:46.120 it's

00:45:46.320 funny

00:45:46.620 but

00:45:46.860 it

00:45:46.960 isn't

00:45:47.100 really

00:45:47.300 funny

00:45:47.760 I

00:45:48.720 mean

00:45:48.800 it's

00:45:48.920 not

00:45:49.080 really

00:45:53.980 last

00:45:54.240 name

00:45:54.580 can

00:45:55.100 be

00:45:55.400 turned

00:45:56.160 into

00:45:56.420 something

00:45:56.740 funny

00:45:57.060 but

00:45:58.220 it's

00:46:01.000 not

00:46:01.200 really

00:46:01.700 funny

00:46:02.120 that

00:46:02.360 he's

00:46:02.600 gay

00:46:03.260 you're

00:46:06.240 trying

00:46:06.400 to

00:46:06.540 make

00:46:06.720 his

00:46:07.100 gayness

00:46:07.580 a punch

00:46:07.940 line

00:46:08.180 that's

00:46:08.460 not

00:46:08.580 a punch

00:46:08.880 line

00:46:09.100 I

00:46:12.240 did

00:46:12.440 chuckle

00:46:12.900 yeah

00:46:13.300 I did

00:46:13.580 chuckle

00:46:13.900 at it

00:46:14.120 but

00:46:14.280 really

00:46:14.660 I

00:46:15.700 think

00:46:15.820 we

00:46:15.940 can

00:46:16.060 do

00:46:16.180 better

00:46:16.380 than

00:46:16.540 that

00:46:17.380 alright

00:46:17.780 used

00:46:23.120 a

00:46:23.300 spiked

00:46:23.640 handheld

00:46:24.140 metal

00:46:24.500 weapon

00:46:24.880 not

00:46:25.140 exactly

00:46:25.520 a

00:46:25.780 knife

00:46:26.040 more

00:46:26.280 like

00:46:26.500 a

00:46:26.660 small

00:46:27.160 spiked

00:46:27.740 knuckle

00:46:28.980 weapon

00:46:29.420 okay

00:46:30.660 yeah

00:46:32.420 it looked

00:46:32.780 like

00:46:32.980 the

00:46:33.120 guy

00:46:33.300 on

00:46:33.440 the

00:46:33.540 stage

00:46:33.860 was

00:46:34.180 just

00:46:34.400 mentally

00:46:34.920 incompetent

00:46:36.360 right

00:46:36.560 I

00:46:40.380 think

00:46:40.540 that's

00:46:40.760 what

00:46:40.880 was

00:46:41.040 going

00:46:41.240 on

00:46:41.500 so

00:46:45.020 who

00:46:45.300 do

00:46:45.400 we

00:46:45.540 what

00:46:45.840 happens

00:46:46.220 if

00:46:46.560 Joe

00:46:47.600 leaves

00:46:47.980 office

00:46:48.300 early

00:46:48.680 let's

00:46:49.840 let's

00:46:50.080 play

00:46:50.260 this

00:46:50.500 through

00:46:50.740 let's

00:46:51.760 say

00:46:51.880 Biden

00:46:52.200 leaves

00:46:52.500 office

00:46:52.820 and

00:46:53.100 Kamala

00:46:53.540 takes

00:46:53.940 the

00:46:54.140 top

00:46:54.380 spot

00:46:54.800 who

00:46:56.680 is

00:46:57.040 vice

00:46:57.320 president

00:46:57.680 then

00:46:58.000 does

00:46:58.380 she

00:46:58.540 get

00:46:58.680 to

00:46:58.800 appoint

00:46:59.120 one

00:46:59.380 how

00:46:59.860 does

00:46:59.960 that

00:47:00.120 work

00:47:00.380 do

00:47:01.640 you

00:47:01.760 get

00:47:01.880 to

00:47:02.020 appoint

00:47:02.480 a

00:47:02.660 vice

00:47:02.860 president

00:47:03.220 because

00:47:04.200 that

00:47:04.360 feels

00:47:04.580 like

00:47:04.820 the

00:47:05.040 very

00:47:05.400 least

00:47:06.040 democratic

00:47:06.540 thing

00:47:07.020 you

00:47:07.160 could

00:47:07.300 possibly

00:47:07.740 do

00:47:08.000 and

00:47:10.000 who

00:47:10.200 would

00:47:10.380 she

00:47:10.520 appoint

00:47:10.860 so

00:47:13.280 I

00:47:13.580 don't

00:47:13.820 think

00:47:14.060 it's

00:47:14.280 so

00:47:14.840 it's

00:47:15.100 a

00:47:15.220 problem

00:47:15.460 if

00:47:16.080 she

00:47:16.240 appointed

00:47:16.600 Newsom

00:47:17.160 the

00:47:19.360 trouble

00:47:19.640 is

00:47:19.900 that

00:47:20.100 Newsom

00:47:20.660 wants

00:47:22.600 to be

00:47:22.860 president

00:47:23.220 and

00:47:23.480 I'll

00:47:23.620 bet

00:47:23.740 she

00:47:23.900 does

00:47:24.140 too

00:47:24.400 imagine

00:47:25.660 if

00:47:25.880 she

00:47:26.020 served

00:47:26.440 for

00:47:26.640 two

00:47:26.860 years

00:47:27.260 you

00:47:27.480 don't

00:47:27.640 think

00:47:27.800 she'd

00:47:28.020 run

00:47:28.260 so

00:47:29.480 she

00:47:29.700 can't

00:47:30.040 really

00:47:30.260 have

00:47:30.560 a

00:47:30.760 vice

00:47:31.020 president

00:47:31.440 who

00:47:32.440 is

00:47:32.580 stronger

00:47:33.020 than

00:47:33.260 she

00:47:33.460 is

00:47:33.660 for

00:47:33.840 president

00:47:34.240 right

00:47:35.060 so

00:47:36.640 Kamala

00:47:37.020 Harris

00:47:37.340 would

00:47:37.520 have

00:47:37.680 to

00:47:37.800 find

00:47:37.980 somebody

00:47:38.320 who

00:47:38.480 is

00:47:38.600 weaker

00:47:39.040 than

00:47:39.360 her

00:47:39.680 in

00:47:41.160 case

00:47:41.520 two

00:47:42.120 years

00:47:42.400 of her

00:47:42.700 being

00:47:42.880 president

00:47:43.240 works out

00:47:43.820 and she

00:47:44.100 wants to

00:47:44.440 run

00:47:44.640 she

00:47:45.220 probably

00:47:45.460 does

00:47:45.760 I

00:47:48.160 don't

00:47:48.320 think

00:47:48.520 she

00:47:48.680 can

00:47:48.860 bring

00:47:49.060 in

00:47:49.220 somebody

00:47:49.460 stronger

00:47:49.860 than

00:47:50.040 her

00:47:50.240 I

00:47:50.960 don't

00:47:51.120 think

00:47:51.300 she

00:47:51.440 can

00:47:51.640 bring

00:47:51.900 in

00:47:52.260 Pelosi

00:47:53.400 or

00:47:53.980 Clinton

00:47:54.760 they're

00:47:55.280 just

00:47:55.520 it would

00:47:56.360 just

00:47:56.500 draw

00:47:56.720 too much

00:47:57.060 fire

00:47:57.440 I

00:47:58.640 think

00:47:58.820 you

00:47:58.920 want

00:47:59.060 your

00:47:59.200 vice

00:47:59.440 president

00:47:59.760 to be

00:48:00.080 not

00:48:00.380 the

00:48:00.580 story

00:48:00.940 the

00:48:01.720 last

00:48:02.080 thing

00:48:02.340 that

00:48:02.580 Kamala

00:48:03.000 Harris

00:48:03.280 would

00:48:03.440 do

00:48:03.600 is

00:48:03.800 bring

00:48:04.040 in

00:48:04.180 a

00:48:04.300 vice

00:48:04.520 president

00:48:04.900 who

00:48:05.620 becomes

00:48:05.980 the

00:48:06.180 main

00:48:06.400 story

00:48:06.860 that's

00:48:07.820 not

00:48:07.980 going

00:48:08.100 to

00:48:08.120 happen

00:48:08.420 no

00:48:09.800 way

00:48:09.940 that's

00:48:10.180 going

00:48:10.300 to

00:48:10.340 happen

00:48:10.600 so

00:48:11.900 it's

00:48:12.080 got

00:48:12.200 to

00:48:12.260 be

00:48:12.400 somebody

00:48:12.740 like

00:48:13.160 Swalwell

00:48:14.540 who

00:48:15.760 you know

00:48:16.980 he's

00:48:17.160 not

00:48:17.320 going to

00:48:17.540 run

00:48:17.760 for

00:48:17.920 president

00:48:18.300 and

00:48:18.540 get

00:48:18.680 very

00:48:18.900 far

00:48:19.160 yeah

00:48:20.220 somebody

00:48:20.780 like

00:48:21.020 that

00:48:21.200 Pence

00:48:21.740 somebody

00:48:22.660 says

00:48:22.900 Pence

00:48:23.280 Pence

00:48:24.560 would

00:48:24.700 be

00:48:24.820 a

00:48:24.920 good

00:48:25.020 vice

00:48:25.260 president

00:48:25.540 so

00:48:28.140 if

00:48:28.940 she

00:48:29.080 has

00:48:29.300 to

00:48:29.440 pick

00:48:29.600 somebody

00:48:29.920 weak

00:48:30.440 that

00:48:33.560 gives

00:48:33.820 us

00:48:34.000 the

00:48:34.160 very

00:48:34.400 real

00:48:34.680 possibility

00:48:35.280 that

00:48:36.300 we

00:48:36.480 end

00:48:36.680 up

00:48:36.860 with

00:48:37.020 that

00:48:37.180 weak

00:48:37.420 president

00:48:37.820 because

00:48:39.440 Kamala

00:48:39.920 Harris

00:48:40.300 you know

00:48:40.740 the reason

00:48:41.040 we have

00:48:41.280 vice

00:48:41.500 presidents

00:48:41.800 is

00:48:42.100 you need

00:48:42.360 a

00:48:42.480 spare

00:48:42.680 and

00:48:43.540 although

00:48:43.800 Kamala

00:48:44.140 Harris

00:48:44.380 seems

00:48:44.760 young

00:48:45.140 and

00:48:45.380 healthy

00:48:45.780 anything

00:48:47.240 can

00:48:47.480 happen

00:48:47.800 and

00:48:49.160 we'd

00:48:49.400 end

00:48:49.540 up

00:48:49.740 with

00:48:49.920 yeah

00:48:50.120 Jussie

00:48:51.040 Smollett

00:48:51.540 as

00:48:51.820 vice

00:48:52.700 president

00:48:53.060 I

00:48:59.040 think

00:48:59.300 Newsom

00:48:59.700 is

00:48:59.940 way

00:49:00.240 more

00:49:00.540 of

00:49:00.700 a

00:49:00.860 risk

00:49:01.120 to

00:49:01.360 beat

00:49:01.540 Trump

00:49:01.820 than

00:49:02.020 you

00:49:02.200 do

00:49:02.380 what

00:49:02.560 do

00:49:02.640 you

00:49:02.720 think

00:49:03.000 Newsom

00:49:04.420 versus

00:49:04.760 Trump

00:49:05.280 straight

00:49:05.840 up

00:49:06.060 for

00:49:06.260 president

00:49:06.660 who

00:49:07.000 wins

00:49:07.420 who

00:49:11.300 wins

00:49:11.740 I

00:49:14.360 think

00:49:14.700 it's

00:49:14.860 a

00:49:14.980 toss

00:49:15.220 up

00:49:15.480 Newsom

00:49:16.900 could

00:49:17.080 beat

00:49:17.260 him

00:49:17.420 he

00:49:18.960 could

00:49:19.220 Newsom

00:49:20.640 could

00:49:20.800 beat

00:49:20.980 him

00:49:21.180 I

00:49:23.720 hate

00:49:23.880 to

00:49:24.000 say

00:49:24.160 it

00:49:24.400 yeah

00:49:27.780 it

00:49:27.980 doesn't

00:49:28.220 matter

00:49:28.420 what

00:49:28.620 the

00:49:28.920 it

00:49:29.820 doesn't

00:49:30.240 matter

00:49:30.480 at

00:49:30.620 all

00:49:30.760 what

00:49:30.960 the

00:49:31.160 polls

00:49:31.380 say

00:49:31.620 today

00:49:31.940 once

00:49:32.600 it

00:49:32.720 becomes

00:49:33.120 a

00:49:33.320 Democrat

00:49:33.660 versus

00:49:34.160 a

00:49:34.440 Republican

00:49:34.860 once

00:49:36.240 again

00:49:36.560 it

00:49:36.920 becomes

00:49:37.300 anybody

00:49:38.500 but

00:49:38.840 Trump

00:49:39.180 Newsom

00:49:40.360 just

00:49:40.580 has

00:49:40.780 to

00:49:40.900 be

00:49:41.020 anybody

00:49:41.300 but

00:49:41.600 Trump

00:49:41.880 that's

00:49:43.600 all

00:49:43.720 it

00:49:43.820 takes

00:49:44.120 it

00:49:44.640 just

00:49:44.800 has

00:49:45.000 to

00:49:45.080 be

00:49:45.180 anybody

00:49:45.440 but

00:49:45.680 Trump

00:49:45.900 it

00:49:46.260 worked

00:49:46.500 the

00:49:46.640 last

00:49:46.860 time

00:49:47.060 it

00:49:47.180 will

00:49:47.260 work

00:49:47.440 again

00:49:47.780 and

00:49:48.800 imagine

00:49:49.140 somebody

00:49:49.540 who's

00:49:49.740 anybody

00:49:50.020 but

00:49:50.300 Trump

00:49:50.560 but

00:49:50.840 not

00:49:51.180 mentally

00:49:51.700 incompetent

00:49:52.480 right

00:49:53.780 no matter

00:49:54.140 what you

00:49:54.480 say

00:49:54.660 of him

00:49:54.940 he is

00:49:55.380 capable

00:49:55.820 he's

00:49:56.580 capable

00:49:56.980 you can't

00:50:00.080 take that

00:50:00.380 away from

00:50:00.720 him

00:50:00.900 he's

00:50:01.200 capable

00:50:01.540 I

00:50:03.580 think

00:50:03.780 he

00:50:03.900 could

00:50:04.040 win

00:50:04.220 I

00:50:05.500 think

00:50:05.660 he

00:50:05.780 could

00:50:06.000 does

00:50:08.060 anybody

00:50:08.300 agree

00:50:08.560 with

00:50:08.720 me

00:50:08.940 do

00:50:09.580 I

00:50:09.660 have

00:50:09.780 anybody

00:50:10.280 who

00:50:10.460 agrees

00:50:10.720 with

00:50:10.820 me

00:50:10.900 okay

00:50:11.100 I

00:50:11.260 do

00:50:11.360 have

00:50:11.520 some

00:50:11.660 agreements

00:50:12.060 because

00:50:12.740 all

00:50:12.920 you

00:50:13.020 have

00:50:13.120 to

00:50:13.200 do

00:50:13.320 is

00:50:13.420 get

00:50:13.560 the

00:50:13.720 Democrats

00:50:14.180 on

00:50:14.360 the

00:50:14.460 same

00:50:14.660 side

00:50:15.140 Newsom

00:50:17.560 has

00:50:17.760 one

00:50:18.100 job

00:50:18.580 one

00:50:19.340 job

00:50:19.740 to get

00:50:20.880 Democrats

00:50:21.460 all voting

00:50:22.280 on the

00:50:22.820 same

00:50:23.000 side

00:50:23.360 I

00:50:24.380 think

00:50:24.640 that's

00:50:24.940 easy

00:50:25.280 governor

00:50:26.740 of

00:50:27.020 California

00:50:27.600 you know

00:50:29.340 more

00:50:29.540 progressive

00:50:30.080 but also

00:50:31.600 you know

00:50:32.240 reasonably

00:50:32.940 you know

00:50:34.380 not crazy

00:50:34.980 I

00:50:36.340 don't

00:50:36.480 know

00:50:36.680 I

00:50:36.920 think

00:50:37.120 he

00:50:37.220 gets

00:50:37.420 all

00:50:37.560 the

00:50:37.720 Democrats

00:50:38.160 and

00:50:39.060 then

00:50:39.360 that's

00:50:40.360 all

00:50:40.480 you

00:50:40.580 need

00:50:40.840 there

00:50:41.100 are

00:50:41.200 more

00:50:41.360 Democrats

00:50:41.820 than

00:50:42.000 Republicans

00:50:42.400 that's

00:50:42.720 all

00:50:42.860 you

00:50:43.000 need

00:50:43.220 and

00:50:44.040 there

00:50:44.140 will

00:50:44.220 still

00:50:44.440 be

00:50:44.620 people

00:50:44.880 who

00:50:45.000 say

00:50:45.120 you know

00:50:45.480 at

00:50:46.280 least

00:50:46.500 he

00:50:46.680 looks

00:50:46.900 sane

00:50:47.340 you know

00:50:47.940 I

00:50:48.080 don't

00:50:48.240 like

00:50:48.420 this

00:50:48.620 Trump

00:50:48.860 guy

00:50:49.160 so

00:50:49.380 I'm

00:50:50.180 going

00:50:50.280 to

00:50:50.320 go

00:50:50.460 for

00:50:50.600 a

00:50:50.700 Democrat

00:50:50.960 at

00:50:51.120 least

00:50:51.260 he's

00:50:51.400 not

00:50:51.560 crazy

00:50:51.960 because

00:50:52.640 there

00:50:52.760 are

00:50:52.780 a

00:50:52.880 lot

00:50:52.980 of

00:50:53.080 people

00:50:53.280 who

00:50:53.560 didn't

00:50:54.000 maybe

00:50:54.360 love

00:51:04.980 I'm

00:51:05.180 wrong

00:51:05.480 let's

00:51:06.600 do

00:51:06.960 this

00:51:07.200 on

00:51:07.340 a

00:51:07.460 scale

00:51:07.660 of

00:51:07.780 1

00:51:07.920 to

00:51:08.040 10

00:51:08.280 Republicans

00:51:10.880 would

00:51:11.340 dislike

00:51:11.880 Hillary

00:51:12.200 Clinton

00:51:12.640 10

00:51:13.640 so far

00:51:15.260 are you

00:51:15.400 with me

00:51:15.780 that

00:51:16.960 nobody

00:51:17.480 would be

00:51:17.860 hated

00:51:18.100 more

00:51:18.580 than

00:51:18.740 her

00:51:18.900 probably

00:51:19.320 she's

00:51:19.900 probably

00:51:20.100 a

00:51:20.280 10

00:51:20.520 what

00:51:21.520 would

00:51:21.720 Newsom

00:51:22.120 be

00:51:22.300 on

00:51:22.480 the

00:51:22.600 same

00:51:22.900 scale

00:51:23.260 of

00:51:23.400 1

00:51:23.560 to

00:51:23.660 10

00:51:23.960 it's

00:51:25.380 more

00:51:25.580 like

00:51:25.840 you

00:51:25.980 don't

00:51:26.220 prefer

00:51:26.620 him

00:51:26.860 isn't

00:51:27.100 it

00:51:27.320 it's

00:51:28.400 different

00:51:28.840 Newsom

00:51:30.360 is

00:51:30.500 just

00:51:30.660 somebody

00:51:30.900 you

00:51:31.040 don't

00:51:31.260 prefer

00:51:31.800 Hillary

00:51:33.200 is

00:51:33.540 somebody

00:51:33.900 you

00:51:34.200 want

00:51:34.400 to

00:51:34.500 have

00:51:34.640 a

00:51:34.740 terrible

00:51:35.000 accident

00:51:35.480 I

00:51:38.100 take

00:51:38.640 that

00:51:38.820 back

00:51:39.100 you

00:51:39.260 don't

00:51:39.420 want

00:51:39.620 that

00:51:39.900 you

00:51:40.980 don't

00:51:41.120 want

00:51:41.300 anybody

00:51:41.580 to

00:51:41.720 be

00:51:41.820 hurt

00:51:42.060 but

00:51:42.540 the

00:51:42.760 point

00:51:42.980 is

00:51:43.240 that

00:51:43.540 people

00:51:43.880 have

00:51:44.100 a

00:51:44.300 much

00:51:44.740 worse

00:51:45.060 opinion

00:51:45.360 of

00:51:45.600 Hillary

00:51:45.880 than

00:51:46.840 they

00:51:47.020 do

00:51:47.260 of

00:51:47.620 Newsom

00:51:48.000 I

00:51:50.140 think

00:51:50.340 Newsom

00:51:50.760 is

00:51:51.100 unfortunately

00:51:52.800 likable

00:51:53.520 enough

00:51:54.080 that

00:51:56.060 he

00:51:56.320 would

00:51:56.580 just

00:51:56.820 get

00:51:57.020 all

00:51:57.200 the

00:51:57.400 anything

00:51:57.840 but

00:51:58.100 Trump

00:51:58.320 vote

00:51:58.660 I

00:51:59.380 think

00:51:59.640 I

00:52:02.440 was

00:52:02.600 speculating

00:52:03.080 on an

00:52:03.680 election

00:52:03.980 that's

00:52:04.260 30

00:52:04.520 months

00:52:04.780 away

00:52:05.120 gee

00:52:05.760 have

00:52:05.920 I

00:52:06.020 ever

00:52:06.200 done

00:52:06.400 that

00:52:06.600 successfully

00:52:07.160 have

00:52:08.800 I

00:52:08.940 ever

00:52:09.120 speculated

00:52:09.760 on an

00:52:10.180 election

00:52:10.440 that was

00:52:10.720 two years

00:52:11.160 away

00:52:11.460 and

00:52:11.700 did

00:52:12.640 okay

00:52:13.000 I

00:52:15.800 wonder

00:52:16.080 all

00:52:17.420 right

00:52:17.620 ask the

00:52:19.180 AI

00:52:19.540 ask the

00:52:20.920 AI

00:52:21.220 who has

00:52:21.540 the best

00:52:21.820 predictions

00:52:22.280 it

00:52:22.620 knows

00:52:22.960 it

00:52:23.540 knows

00:52:23.960 it

00:52:24.820 knows

00:52:25.260 all

00:52:26.140 right

00:52:26.320 ask the

00:52:27.620 AI

00:52:27.860 who is

00:52:28.200 the most

00:52:28.480 influential

00:52:29.000 person

00:52:29.540 in the

00:52:29.760 country

00:52:30.040 who's

00:52:30.240 not

00:52:30.440 elected

00:52:30.780 I

00:52:32.280 dare

00:52:32.500 you

00:52:33.020 I

00:52:35.180 dare

00:52:35.440 you

00:52:35.700 ask

00:52:36.440 the

00:52:36.660 AI

00:52:37.620 who's

00:52:38.080 the

00:52:38.220 most

00:52:38.480 influential

00:52:39.200 person

00:52:39.640 in the

00:52:39.880 country

00:52:40.180 who's

00:52:40.400 not

00:52:40.620 elected

00:52:40.980 it

00:52:41.420 won't

00:52:41.580 be

00:52:41.700 me

00:52:42.000 yeah

00:52:43.100 it'll

00:52:43.260 be

00:52:43.380 somebody

00:52:43.600 like

00:52:43.860 Musk

00:52:44.280 or

00:52:44.480 Joe

00:52:44.660 Rogan

00:52:44.960 or

00:52:45.080 something

00:52:45.380 maybe

00:52:46.620 Tucker

00:52:46.940 yeah

00:52:47.860 but

00:52:48.860 ask

00:52:49.380 it

00:52:49.480 that

00:52:49.620 question

00:52:49.940 see

00:52:50.180 what

00:52:50.280 happens

00:52:50.620 all

00:52:52.260 right

00:52:52.400 that

00:52:53.180 is

00:52:53.320 all

00:52:53.600 for

00:52:53.880 today

00:52:54.200 I'm

00:52:54.460 going

00:52:54.560 to

00:52:54.780 turn

00:52:55.200 off

00:52:55.380 the

00:52:55.540 YouTube

00:52:55.820 feed

00:52:56.300 and

00:52:56.500 Spotify

00:52:56.940 thanks

00:52:58.320 for

00:52:58.500 joining

00:52:58.800 you're

00:53:00.220 always

00:53:00.440 awesome

00:53:00.760 bye for

00:53:02.140 now

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 22, 2022

Episode 1812 Scott Adams： I Found Out Artificial Intelligence Gets Information From Me. Uh-Oh

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Summary

Transcript