Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1821 Scott Adams： Fox Shuns Trump, Depopulation Rumors And More Fun

00:00:00.000 Shall we?

00:00:01.700 Now, you will be amazed at the following thing that happens.

00:00:05.980 Watch me remember the simultaneous sip introduction.

00:00:12.200 All you need is a cup or mug or glass, a tank or gel, a canteen jug or flask,

00:00:18.200 a vessel of any kind, filling with your favorite liquid.

00:00:20.540 I like coffee.

00:00:23.000 And join me now for the dopamine hit of the day,

00:00:27.720 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:30.000 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:33.520 Go.

00:00:40.740 All right, well, that was close.

00:00:43.600 So let's talk about all the cool things that are happening.

00:00:47.040 Here's something that makes me happy.

00:00:49.300 There's an Israeli food tech startup called Savor Eat

00:00:53.700 that's making 3D printed pork patties, turkeys, and burgers.

00:01:00.000 YouTube just keeps going on and off, so there's no point in continuing with that.

00:01:06.820 Hey, YouTube, for some reason, YouTube just keeps turning on and off,

00:01:10.740 whereas the locals platform...

00:01:13.780 Let's see if I can even say this long enough.

00:01:17.420 It's so unstable, it gives me like 10 seconds shot.

00:01:21.060 I mean, I'm going to shut down YouTube in a moment, but I wanted to tell him.

00:01:24.900 Yeah, yeah, it's done.

00:01:27.620 All right, Scott doesn't get paid today.

00:01:32.620 That's what that means, by the way.

00:01:34.580 That means that the monetization for today's show is off.

00:01:40.300 Not that that matters a lot, but yes, you did pay, that's true.

00:01:43.560 And you are now my only audience.

00:01:49.600 That's right.

00:01:53.120 I still have locals, and that's all I need.

00:01:56.780 Because if YouTube had good technology, they'd be listening to me now.

00:02:02.500 It's what you've been waiting for, finally.

00:02:06.000 All right.

00:02:07.020 So anyway, this Israeli startup,

00:02:11.020 they can 3D print food.

00:02:13.560 And they can make meat.

00:02:16.600 Now, don't you think they can make something that tastes like vegetables?

00:02:20.960 Probably.

00:02:22.140 Probably.

00:02:23.400 And apparently it's, you know, who knows how healthy it is

00:02:26.540 and how many chemical additives are involved in it.

00:02:30.260 I don't know.

00:02:31.060 So I'm not going to tell you it's healthy or unhealthy.

00:02:34.380 But I feel like this is the solution to our food problems.

00:02:39.580 And what I mean is food cost.

00:02:42.140 Could you imagine, could you imagine a 3D printer in your kitchen that's your only kitchen?

00:02:50.200 You know, maybe you've got a sink and garbage and stuff.

00:02:52.640 But basically, could you imagine only having a 3D printer?

00:02:55.980 It'd be like a replicator.

00:02:57.120 Yeah, basically, it's a redneck replicator.

00:03:01.680 But, you know, the thing I complained about was how many times you have to pack and unpack food.

00:03:07.600 You know, how many times does it change hands, food, any kind of food, before it gets on the shelf?

00:03:13.480 It goes through all kinds of processing and people and distributors and wholesalers, farmers.

00:03:20.540 And then it gets to the grocery store.

00:03:22.980 And then, you know, somebody puts it on the shelf.

00:03:25.840 I put it in my cart, my cart on the thing, the thing in the car, the car into the counter, the counter into the...

00:03:31.480 Yeah, basically, it's like probably 12 to 15 times it changes hands, or it goes from one place to another to stage it.

00:03:41.460 Wouldn't you say?

00:03:43.000 Don't you think food probably changes states, meaning it's in a place or it's being shipped or it's being handled,

00:03:50.180 probably 15 times before it gets to you?

00:03:53.520 But imagine if the only thing you had to receive was the fuel for your 3D printer.

00:04:00.980 And, you know, once a week somebody comes with a bunch of, you know, basically, you know, ink, except it's for your food,

00:04:08.040 and you just print all your food.

00:04:10.160 How awesome would that be?

00:04:11.860 Very awesome.

00:04:14.600 All right.

00:04:15.980 Jon Stewart apparently fell victim to some fake news.

00:04:20.180 Are you watching that?

00:04:21.000 So Jon Stewart's been promoting the burn bill compensation thing.

00:04:29.200 So the veterans who apparently were injured by being around these burn pits,

00:04:36.360 Jon Stewart's trying to get them, you know, health care funding and stuff.

00:04:41.120 And I guess that bill was defeated by the GOP.

00:04:43.600 And Jon Stewart said,

00:04:45.680 Ah, you guys voted for this exact bill before, you guys being the Republicans.

00:04:51.000 But now you say, no.

00:04:53.260 But the real story, the real story is it was a fake bill.

00:04:58.340 It had poison pills and then other spending that had nothing to do with it.

00:05:02.580 So it was a bill designed to screw Republicans or fail.

00:05:07.280 It only had two states.

00:05:09.760 None of the states are the ones that Jon Stewart would want,

00:05:12.780 where there was a clean bill and people passed it.

00:05:16.800 Nothing like that happened.

00:05:17.780 And what happened was the Democrats made sure that it couldn't be passed,

00:05:21.840 or if it did, it would be bad for the country.

00:05:24.420 By throwing in some things that, you know,

00:05:26.960 effectively did not get through a government process

00:05:30.040 because they went through the back door.

00:05:33.540 So Jon Stewart falling for fake news.

00:05:36.280 And you would think you would have noticed that the news is fake.

00:05:44.360 When I heard that the Republicans turned down the burn bill,

00:05:48.300 or in other words,

00:05:50.840 when I heard that the GOP was acting anti-veteran,

00:05:56.800 what was my first thought?

00:05:59.060 Let's see.

00:05:59.780 I'm looking at the news,

00:06:01.740 and the news is telling me that Republicans

00:06:05.260 are not supportive of veterans.

00:06:10.040 What are the possible explanations for why this news is what it is?

00:06:14.780 One, Republicans have completely changed who they are overnight.

00:06:20.160 Two, it's yet another example of Democrats playing that trick

00:06:24.620 where they put a poison pill into a legitimate bill

00:06:28.460 so that you can't vote on it.

00:06:30.840 Like you can't possibly approve it.

00:06:32.360 It's just so ugly by the time you vote on it.

00:06:36.320 So I'm going to say that Jon Stewart

00:06:39.260 is at least one level of awareness below me.

00:06:43.940 And probably you.

00:06:44.940 How many of you have the same experience?

00:06:48.980 When you saw the news

00:06:50.060 that the Republicans had turned down

00:06:53.000 some kind of thing that was good for veterans,

00:06:55.180 how many of you knew it was fake news

00:06:58.100 as soon as you saw it?

00:06:59.640 Yeah, raise your hand.

00:07:00.400 All of you, right?

00:07:01.760 Pretty much everybody who watches this live stream

00:07:03.900 knew that was fake news from the jump.

00:07:06.460 And it's always fake news in the same way,

00:07:08.680 that they threw a poison pill in there,

00:07:11.180 meaning they added some funding for unrelated things

00:07:14.060 that Republicans don't like.

00:07:17.800 So do you suppose that Jon Stewart

00:07:20.800 is not operating on a level of awareness

00:07:23.900 where he understands that this is fake news?

00:07:31.080 You're right, he is.

00:07:34.960 I don't know.

00:07:36.040 It makes me wonder if Jon Stewart

00:07:37.420 was actually fooled by the news

00:07:39.220 or if he's pretending to be fooled

00:07:41.260 because, I don't know, to make a point or something.

00:07:44.200 I'm not sure.

00:07:45.880 Well, let me ask you this.

00:07:47.420 Would you say, collectively,

00:07:49.420 that Joe Biden has been successful

00:07:52.220 with major legislation?

00:07:55.800 So here's a test to you

00:07:57.420 to see if you fell for fake news.

00:07:59.960 Let's see if you fell for fake news.

00:08:02.520 Is Joe Biden, has he been successful

00:08:04.580 in large, let's say, major legislation?

00:08:07.900 Well, here's what CNN's take was

00:08:12.700 in one opinion piece anyway.

00:08:16.320 President Joe Biden has scored successes

00:08:18.260 on issues such as infrastructure

00:08:20.360 and gun safety.

00:08:22.360 So, you know, you don't have to like those bills,

00:08:24.620 but just in terms of are they major

00:08:26.240 and are they big issues, yes.

00:08:29.240 And did he give some legislation passed

00:08:31.040 that he liked?

00:08:32.320 Apparently, yes.

00:08:33.540 So infrastructure and gun safety.

00:08:35.560 Now, this is the Democrat version, right?

00:08:38.760 And the CHIPS bill.

00:08:40.400 The CHIPS bill,

00:08:42.060 I think it moves our chip manufacturing

00:08:44.860 back to the United States

00:08:45.980 or promotes that.

00:08:47.960 So that's good.

00:08:49.300 So those are three pretty big things.

00:08:51.160 And then he's got this

00:08:52.140 major climate bill

00:08:55.120 that looks like it's got a good chance

00:08:56.740 of passing in the Senate as well.

00:08:58.040 Well, that would be pretty,

00:08:59.720 wouldn't that be pretty major?

00:09:03.140 For one term,

00:09:04.400 that would be four fairly substantial bills.

00:09:10.240 I don't know.

00:09:10.740 I think they can make a compelling case

00:09:14.100 that he's been successful,

00:09:16.180 at least successful in terms

00:09:17.740 of the Democratic initiatives.

00:09:21.060 I'm not sure any of those bills are useful.

00:09:23.740 I have no idea if it's a waste of money or not.

00:09:26.060 But at least he got what he said he would get.

00:09:28.040 A CHIPS is a fail because it doesn't help.

00:09:32.440 Yeah.

00:09:33.100 Most of these things have a title of the bill

00:09:36.140 that is completely misleading

00:09:37.900 to what the bill is.

00:09:39.580 So if you look at what the bill says it is,

00:09:42.600 what we really need is some kind of truth.

00:09:46.180 Truth in labeling, don't you think?

00:09:49.460 We need a truth in labeling, don't we?

00:09:52.300 Yeah.

00:09:53.040 Because these bills are all labeled

00:09:54.520 the opposite of what they are.

00:09:55.560 And the Congress makes every other product

00:09:59.620 put its ingredients on the label.

00:10:02.620 Oh, you see where I'm going?

00:10:05.660 Congress should be forced

00:10:07.060 to put its ingredients on the label.

00:10:09.680 In other words, what's in the bill?

00:10:12.360 Including, you know how if you look

00:10:14.180 at the ingredients on a package,

00:10:16.180 it will tell you the good stuff that's in it,

00:10:18.480 protein, vitamin D, and stuff.

00:10:20.560 But it also tells you how much sugar and fat, right?

00:10:25.780 So it tells you what's good,

00:10:28.680 and then it also, and trans fat.

00:10:30.420 So it also tells you what will be bad for you.

00:10:32.640 It's right there in the package.

00:10:34.720 Why can't Congress,

00:10:37.300 and let me ask Thomas Massey,

00:10:39.780 or, you know, I don't know, Tom Cotton,

00:10:43.740 or somebody who's, you know, not worthless?

00:10:48.940 How many people in Congress?

00:10:50.380 Matt Gaetz.

00:10:51.500 That's a perfect Matt Gaetz topic, isn't it?

00:10:55.480 Rand Paul.

00:10:57.840 So those are the ones I think would be capable.

00:11:01.960 Right?

00:11:02.300 Matt Gaetz could do it,

00:11:03.320 could do it because he's got nothing to lose,

00:11:05.100 and it would be hilarious.

00:11:06.680 Am I right?

00:11:08.280 Matt Gaetz could do a truth in labeling proposal

00:11:12.120 because he's got nothing to lose.

00:11:14.300 It would be awesome.

00:11:16.880 You know, he's the most dangerous politician

00:11:18.820 in the country right now.

00:11:19.860 You know that, right?

00:11:21.660 Matt Gaetz, by far, is the most dangerous

00:11:24.080 in a good or bad way,

00:11:26.280 depending on your point of view.

00:11:27.560 He's the most dangerous

00:11:28.600 because he can do anything now.

00:11:31.340 He's been moved to the category

00:11:32.940 of people who are completely free.

00:11:34.720 There's no constraints on that guy anymore.

00:11:38.820 He has nothing to lose.

00:11:40.700 So if you want somebody to tell the truth

00:11:43.340 in front of the country,

00:11:44.600 you would hire him

00:11:45.620 because it looks like he's willing to do that,

00:11:48.500 and literally nobody else is doing it.

00:11:51.820 Yeah, what happened with Matt Gaetz?

00:11:53.300 Do you remember all that alleged legal trouble

00:11:55.880 that Matt Gaetz was going to be in?

00:11:58.260 Where's that?

00:12:00.240 Do you remember that accuser?

00:12:03.120 Never heard from her, did you?

00:12:05.340 So where is this witness?

00:12:08.420 And obviously they would have,

00:12:09.940 it would be easy to get digital evidence

00:12:12.440 of some crime, right?

00:12:13.900 So anything that Matt Gaetz did on email

00:12:16.460 or whatever, they probably have that already.

00:12:19.280 I don't see any, do you see any charges?

00:12:22.620 Do you?

00:12:24.320 Was the Matt Gaetz thing entirely bullshit?

00:12:27.340 Because it looks like it.

00:12:29.120 It just disappeared.

00:12:31.040 How do things just disappear?

00:12:32.520 I mean, it looks to me that that was all fake.

00:12:38.880 Anyway, I'd like to see maybe a Thomas Massey

00:12:41.820 or Rand Paul or Matt Gaetz

00:12:44.340 or somebody who's got some, you know, gonads.

00:12:49.240 Say Lauren Boebert.

00:12:50.860 She has more balls than most of the people in Congress.

00:12:54.540 And I don't care who it is,

00:12:55.820 but somebody just needs to do a,

00:12:58.180 somebody needs to do some kind of a

00:13:02.000 truth and labeling thing for the legislation.

00:13:04.360 All right.

00:13:06.700 What is your belief about our supply chain and our ports?

00:13:13.580 Yeah, those are all good names.

00:13:15.660 What about our supply chain and our ports?

00:13:19.340 Do you think they're getting better or worse?

00:13:21.720 I guess they got better in May and June,

00:13:24.080 and I told you that problem might be solved.

00:13:26.100 But apparently they're, they're backed up again.

00:13:30.660 Yeah, the report, the reporting disappeared,

00:13:32.920 but their ports are backed up.

00:13:34.520 But yeah, it's worse.

00:13:36.540 It's worse on some ports.

00:13:38.740 There are some ports that don't seem to be terribly impacted.

00:13:43.400 Ports owned by China?

00:13:45.440 That's not true, is it?

00:13:47.680 Is that true?

00:13:48.860 That doesn't feel true,

00:13:50.640 that the ports that are having trouble

00:13:52.020 have some Chinese ownership.

00:13:53.580 I don't, I don't think that's true, is it?

00:13:55.620 That doesn't sound right.

00:13:57.560 All right.

00:14:00.580 Here's what I wonder.

00:14:01.880 Is it because demand is so high?

00:14:04.740 Is our economy cooking so hard

00:14:06.880 that we just can't deliver all the goods?

00:14:10.420 It's incompetence, you think.

00:14:14.560 Yeah.

00:14:16.700 Oh, parts from China are delayed.

00:14:18.920 Well, but that wouldn't affect

00:14:20.100 the unloading of the ships.

00:14:21.800 So I guess we've got some question

00:14:23.160 about the reporting on the shipping supply chain.

00:14:26.360 Here's the other thing I don't know.

00:14:28.860 Don't you think that by now,

00:14:31.280 and this is just speculation,

00:14:33.480 and it's part of the Adams Law

00:14:35.320 of slow-moving disasters,

00:14:37.360 if you knew there was going to be

00:14:38.780 a long-term supply chain backlog,

00:14:41.900 what ways would you adjust?

00:14:44.560 I feel like the ways you would adjust

00:14:46.480 is you would unload

00:14:47.400 the most important ships first.

00:14:49.920 Am I right?

00:14:51.360 Because normally I would imagine,

00:14:53.240 this is just speculation,

00:14:55.120 I would imagine the ships get unloaded

00:14:57.200 first come, first serve.

00:14:59.300 Does that make sense?

00:15:01.060 Probably.

00:15:01.640 If everything's fast,

00:15:02.740 you just do first come, first serve.

00:15:04.600 But if you've got an emergency,

00:15:06.240 and there's a backlog,

00:15:07.900 I feel like the most important ones

00:15:09.680 probably go to the front line.

00:15:10.940 What do you think?

00:15:13.660 You know, like,

00:15:14.160 if something has microchips in it,

00:15:15.960 don't you think that goes

00:15:16.660 to the front of the line?

00:15:18.500 Perishables, microchips.

00:15:20.460 Yeah, so it could be that

00:15:21.860 we're not noticing the impact,

00:15:24.400 because if you buy some consumer good,

00:15:26.960 it takes two months instead of a week.

00:15:30.040 But, you know,

00:15:30.860 it's some little consumer good.

00:15:32.340 It's a toaster.

00:15:33.820 You know, if you buy a toaster,

00:15:35.140 maybe it takes a month to get it.

00:15:36.500 But if you buy food,

00:15:38.180 it seems to be there.

00:15:40.520 Right?

00:15:41.200 So it could be that

00:15:42.260 they're doing the important stuff,

00:15:43.940 so we don't really notice

00:15:45.060 there's much difference.

00:15:46.060 And I don't see any reporting on that, do you?

00:15:48.200 Why am I the first person

00:15:50.700 who is floating the notion

00:15:52.780 that they may have changed

00:15:54.500 their priorities at the port

00:15:55.660 and completely lessened

00:15:57.440 the impact on the public?

00:15:59.000 Or they didn't,

00:16:00.520 which would be also

00:16:01.560 a gigantic story, right?

00:16:03.420 If the ports did nothing different,

00:16:05.340 and all they did is

00:16:07.220 suffer the problem,

00:16:09.420 well, I'd want to know about that.

00:16:11.400 Wouldn't you?

00:16:12.160 Wouldn't you want to know

00:16:12.880 that they were doing nothing

00:16:13.800 to help the problem?

00:16:15.760 So, I don't know.

00:16:16.640 The total lack of reporting on this

00:16:18.300 is kind of interesting.

00:16:20.500 All right, now here's

00:16:21.320 a really interesting situation

00:16:23.840 brewing with Trump and Murdoch.

00:16:27.520 So my understanding is

00:16:29.040 that various Murdoch-owned entities,

00:16:32.160 they would include

00:16:34.080 the Wall Street Journal

00:16:36.420 and the, is it,

00:16:38.220 which is it,

00:16:38.820 New York Post or Daily News?

00:16:40.100 Is it the New York Post?

00:16:41.780 Which one?

00:16:42.180 Yeah, New York Post.

00:16:43.620 All right, and Fox News.

00:16:46.400 So the New York Post

00:16:47.460 and the Wall Street Journal

00:16:48.220 have both,

00:16:49.440 at least reportedly,

00:16:51.940 turned anti-Trump.

00:16:54.100 Can you confirm that?

00:16:55.420 That's true, right?

00:16:56.260 And the reporting is,

00:16:58.440 and I don't know

00:16:58.860 how reliable this is, right?

00:17:00.540 I wouldn't assume

00:17:01.440 this is totally reliable

00:17:02.540 because it requires

00:17:03.500 a little bit of mind reading.

00:17:05.080 But it sounds like

00:17:06.240 the Murdoch family,

00:17:07.500 father and, you know,

00:17:09.520 Lackland, probably the CEO,

00:17:11.540 seem to be anti-Trump.

00:17:13.280 And the latest reporting

00:17:14.980 is that Fox News

00:17:16.080 is shunning Trump.

00:17:19.040 Now, the opinion people

00:17:20.780 are still talking about him,

00:17:22.300 but the network

00:17:23.700 is not having him on,

00:17:24.840 and I think it didn't cover

00:17:26.060 his last speech,

00:17:27.480 which I don't think

00:17:28.380 is a big deal

00:17:28.980 because he's not in office.

00:17:31.720 But do you think that's true?

00:17:33.060 Do you think Fox News

00:17:33.980 is going to shun Trump?

00:17:37.440 So, yes or no?

00:17:40.800 I feel like it's going to be a mix.

00:17:42.840 You know, one of the interesting

00:17:43.620 things about Murdoch

00:17:44.900 is he does allow

00:17:47.940 dissenting voices

00:17:49.020 on his platforms.

00:17:51.100 Like, you know,

00:17:51.800 I'm not talking about

00:17:53.560 slightly dissenting.

00:17:56.360 Murdoch does allow

00:17:57.400 a lot of voices

00:17:58.020 on his network.

00:17:59.780 Now, you could argue

00:18:00.840 maybe more,

00:18:01.800 maybe he's got his thumb

00:18:03.280 on stuff,

00:18:04.160 but I've always noticed that.

00:18:05.740 Have you?

00:18:07.380 Yeah.

00:18:08.000 Now, full disclosure,

00:18:10.600 you know,

00:18:11.380 I've published books

00:18:12.300 under an entity

00:18:13.240 at one point

00:18:13.960 that was Murdoch,

00:18:15.480 and, yeah,

00:18:17.980 I've sort of been

00:18:18.760 associated with that

00:18:20.100 whole Murdoch world.

00:18:22.940 And my impression was

00:18:26.760 they never tried

00:18:27.320 to censor me,

00:18:28.520 at least in the publishing wing.

00:18:33.540 Fentanyl and the distribution.

00:18:35.000 I don't know what that means.

00:18:36.780 Anyway,

00:18:37.660 what happens if

00:18:38.760 Murdoch decides

00:18:39.940 that Trump will not be president

00:18:41.400 while Trump is deciding

00:18:43.120 he's running

00:18:43.760 and going to be president?

00:18:45.760 Take a vote.

00:18:46.880 Do you think that Murdoch

00:18:47.960 is strong enough

00:18:48.940 to prevent Trump

00:18:50.780 from being president

00:18:51.680 if, let's say,

00:18:53.180 he had the votes?

00:18:55.800 Oh, you don't think so.

00:18:57.280 So most of you

00:18:57.960 are saying

00:18:58.380 we have some yeses,

00:19:00.800 but it looks like

00:19:01.580 the majority of you,

00:19:02.740 maybe at least 75%,

00:19:04.340 are saying

00:19:05.660 that you think

00:19:07.640 Trump would have

00:19:08.300 more power

00:19:09.380 than Murdoch?

00:19:11.840 Hard to say.

00:19:13.120 I do think that

00:19:14.340 taking Trump

00:19:15.740 off the major platforms

00:19:17.360 would have an impact.

00:19:20.500 You think he transcends media,

00:19:22.600 but you still have to see him.

00:19:24.840 Right?

00:19:24.980 He's off of Twitter.

00:19:26.100 If he's off of Twitter

00:19:27.420 and off of Fox News,

00:19:29.420 or even reduced

00:19:30.560 in Fox News

00:19:31.300 to like 50%,

00:19:32.380 how can he win?

00:19:36.220 Yeah,

00:19:36.760 because most of the country

00:19:37.580 is not on Twitter.

00:19:39.380 You know,

00:19:40.280 Twitter is smallish

00:19:41.520 if you look at

00:19:42.200 the whole country.

00:19:45.760 YouTube?

00:19:46.580 You know,

00:19:46.880 YouTube?

00:19:47.480 I don't know.

00:19:50.340 Well,

00:19:50.840 keep an eye on that.

00:19:52.680 I do think

00:19:53.800 Murdoch

00:19:54.340 could keep Trump

00:19:55.160 out of office.

00:19:57.720 So,

00:19:58.840 you know,

00:19:59.440 I don't think

00:19:59.880 it's binary.

00:20:01.200 I don't think,

00:20:01.720 you know,

00:20:01.920 you could say

00:20:02.320 he definitely would

00:20:03.180 or definitely wouldn't.

00:20:04.280 But I think

00:20:04.780 I think

00:20:05.820 if Murdoch

00:20:06.440 is absolutely

00:20:07.460 set on Trump

00:20:09.540 not being president,

00:20:10.460 I think he can prevent it.

00:20:12.840 And what country

00:20:13.920 does Murdoch,

00:20:15.680 what is he a citizen of?

00:20:18.200 Oh, yeah.

00:20:19.840 Australia.

00:20:21.980 Australia, right?

00:20:24.640 So,

00:20:25.560 correct me

00:20:25.940 if I'm wrong,

00:20:27.440 but an Australian

00:20:28.480 will decide

00:20:29.220 who's president.

00:20:29.840 Am I wrong?

00:20:32.540 It looks like

00:20:33.360 that's the case.

00:20:34.400 Because I don't,

00:20:35.260 it seems to me

00:20:35.920 that a Republican

00:20:36.680 can only win

00:20:37.680 if the Republican

00:20:39.100 machine

00:20:39.500 is strongly

00:20:40.280 behind that candidate.

00:20:42.360 I would think.

00:20:43.920 And I don't see

00:20:44.560 that the Republican

00:20:45.220 machine would operate

00:20:46.300 unless

00:20:46.740 Murdoch

00:20:47.780 is fully on board.

00:20:51.440 Yeah.

00:20:52.100 So I think

00:20:52.640 we have another case

00:20:53.520 where a foreign entity

00:20:54.640 is completely

00:20:55.440 controlling

00:20:56.020 our outcomes.

00:20:57.460 There you go.

00:21:02.060 Why have we

00:21:02.800 never talked

00:21:03.300 about that?

00:21:04.820 You never hear

00:21:06.780 anybody talk

00:21:07.420 about

00:21:07.800 an Australian

00:21:09.700 billionaire

00:21:10.380 controlling America.

00:21:12.560 Because it

00:21:13.280 kind of

00:21:13.900 happened,

00:21:15.300 didn't it?

00:21:16.820 Well,

00:21:17.540 we'll see.

00:21:19.660 Here's a

00:21:20.420 typical CNN

00:21:21.400 story.

00:21:21.980 This is from

00:21:22.380 yesterday.

00:21:22.960 I forgot to do it

00:21:23.640 yesterday.

00:21:24.880 So here's the

00:21:25.700 headline.

00:21:26.880 And then I'll

00:21:27.440 tell you what

00:21:27.900 the story is.

00:21:28.480 So the headline

00:21:28.920 says,

00:21:29.940 an entire

00:21:30.420 North Carolina

00:21:31.320 police department

00:21:32.220 resigned after

00:21:33.800 a black woman

00:21:34.760 town manager

00:21:35.600 was hired.

00:21:36.940 And it gets

00:21:37.740 worse.

00:21:38.980 All of the

00:21:39.520 people who

00:21:39.980 resigned were

00:21:41.100 white.

00:21:43.740 So the

00:21:44.300 entire,

00:21:44.960 there were only

00:21:45.480 eight of them.

00:21:46.040 It was a small

00:21:46.520 town.

00:21:47.120 But the entire

00:21:47.820 North Carolina

00:21:48.480 police department

00:21:49.300 resigned after

00:21:50.220 a black woman

00:21:51.040 town manager

00:21:52.400 was hired to

00:21:53.140 be their

00:21:53.460 boss,

00:21:54.280 basically.

00:21:54.600 So that's

00:21:56.720 pretty bad.

00:21:58.520 Totally real

00:21:59.280 news?

00:22:00.940 Oh, let's

00:22:01.460 dig into the

00:22:02.280 details also on

00:22:03.360 CNN.

00:22:04.280 So I'm not

00:22:04.820 going to any

00:22:05.400 other source.

00:22:06.060 I'm looking at

00:22:06.700 their title.

00:22:07.700 And now I'll

00:22:08.080 look at the

00:22:08.500 details.

00:22:12.060 The evidence

00:22:13.180 is that the

00:22:14.200 new boss,

00:22:15.840 who happened

00:22:16.820 to be a

00:22:17.160 black woman,

00:22:18.500 made them do a

00:22:19.900 whole bunch of

00:22:20.440 extra work

00:22:21.240 compared to what

00:22:22.380 they used to do.

00:22:23.080 and they

00:22:24.560 thought it

00:22:24.840 was more

00:22:25.460 than they

00:22:25.780 could handle

00:22:26.240 and they

00:22:26.760 all quit.

00:22:28.140 Now the

00:22:28.780 reason they

00:22:29.280 quit was

00:22:29.860 explicitly

00:22:30.620 specific things

00:22:32.100 that she

00:22:32.420 was doing,

00:22:33.420 which even

00:22:34.220 you could look

00:22:34.800 at from the

00:22:35.240 outside.

00:22:35.620 Now there

00:22:35.800 was a

00:22:36.080 CRT.

00:22:37.300 She was

00:22:37.920 just making

00:22:38.400 them do

00:22:38.920 way more

00:22:39.940 than their

00:22:40.480 normal job,

00:22:41.280 basically,

00:22:42.160 or historically

00:22:43.060 more than

00:22:43.560 their normal

00:22:44.040 job.

00:22:44.820 So it

00:22:45.460 looked like

00:22:45.800 it was just

00:22:46.180 a normal

00:22:47.540 work-related

00:22:48.700 thing.

00:22:49.700 But then

00:22:50.440 CNN throws

00:22:51.340 in this.

00:22:51.860 studies show

00:22:53.060 people in

00:22:53.580 organizations

00:22:54.580 often think,

00:22:56.100 now let's

00:22:56.640 see if you

00:22:57.020 agree with

00:22:57.440 this,

00:22:58.080 racist

00:22:58.640 opinion.

00:23:00.060 Studies show

00:23:00.680 people in

00:23:01.060 organizations

00:23:01.540 often think

00:23:02.220 black women

00:23:03.120 are more

00:23:04.040 likely to

00:23:04.680 have angry

00:23:05.320 personalities,

00:23:06.960 with studies

00:23:07.460 also suggesting

00:23:08.360 that this

00:23:08.840 negative

00:23:09.240 perception is

00:23:10.560 a unique

00:23:11.160 occurrence for

00:23:12.000 black women.

00:23:13.300 So in other

00:23:13.700 words,

00:23:14.020 black men

00:23:14.640 do not have

00:23:15.560 this reputation.

00:23:16.920 It's black

00:23:17.500 women.

00:23:17.860 So that's

00:23:20.700 what they

00:23:21.800 studied.

00:23:22.200 So they

00:23:22.440 studied if

00:23:23.080 people in

00:23:23.920 corporations

00:23:24.440 had a

00:23:24.860 negative

00:23:25.180 impression

00:23:25.820 of the

00:23:27.080 anger

00:23:27.500 level of

00:23:28.800 black

00:23:29.120 women.

00:23:29.940 And they

00:23:30.260 threw that

00:23:30.660 in the

00:23:30.940 story.

00:23:32.180 Now,

00:23:33.300 so the

00:23:33.760 title suggests

00:23:35.340 there's

00:23:35.620 racism,

00:23:36.580 and then

00:23:37.460 the mention

00:23:37.900 of the

00:23:38.280 study is

00:23:40.000 basically

00:23:40.500 talking about

00:23:41.500 racism,

00:23:42.380 except that

00:23:43.260 the content

00:23:43.800 of the

00:23:44.220 story doesn't

00:23:45.760 involve any

00:23:46.360 racism at

00:23:47.020 all.

00:23:48.300 It's a

00:23:48.680 story about

00:23:49.180 racism wrapped

00:23:50.740 around a

00:23:51.180 story that

00:23:51.540 doesn't have

00:23:51.940 any racism

00:23:52.700 in it.

00:23:53.620 It's literally

00:23:54.220 just some

00:23:54.720 people quit

00:23:55.300 because their

00:23:55.800 boss sucked.

00:23:57.460 That's the

00:23:58.060 only thing we

00:23:58.560 know.

00:24:01.980 Look at that.

00:24:03.940 Oh, look at

00:24:04.560 it.

00:24:05.180 Would you like

00:24:05.860 me to change

00:24:06.420 the sky?

00:24:09.020 Possibly,

00:24:10.060 possibly I have

00:24:11.100 superpowers?

00:24:11.880 Watch this.

00:24:12.780 You see the

00:24:13.240 sun behind me?

00:24:14.420 Watch this.

00:24:15.860 Expand.

00:24:17.680 Expand.

00:24:20.660 Yeah, I'm

00:24:21.460 making the

00:24:21.880 sun bigger.

00:24:22.900 Does it feel

00:24:23.440 warmer where

00:24:24.040 you are?

00:24:25.380 A lot of

00:24:25.940 people don't

00:24:26.300 think I

00:24:26.600 can do

00:24:26.880 this.

00:24:27.780 And now,

00:24:29.700 sun, back

00:24:31.220 to your

00:24:31.460 normal size.

00:24:33.600 There we

00:24:34.140 go.

00:24:34.800 There we

00:24:35.100 go.

00:24:36.100 I can do

00:24:36.720 that again.

00:24:37.400 Sun, grow.

00:24:40.240 Now, back

00:24:41.220 to your

00:24:41.440 normal size.

00:24:42.300 Yeah.

00:24:42.900 Let's see

00:24:46.820 Don Lemon do

00:24:47.500 that.

00:24:48.960 Cannot do

00:24:49.640 it.

00:24:50.300 All right, so

00:24:50.900 here was the

00:24:51.720 question that the

00:24:52.340 Harvard Business

00:24:52.940 Review didn't

00:24:53.760 ask.

00:24:54.640 The question

00:24:55.140 they did

00:24:55.780 ask is,

00:24:57.400 do corporate

00:24:58.080 people think

00:24:58.960 black women in

00:25:00.520 particular are

00:25:02.420 angry or have

00:25:03.660 angry personalities

00:25:04.560 and people said

00:25:05.240 yes?

00:25:05.520 You know

00:25:07.580 what they

00:25:07.800 didn't ask?

00:25:09.220 Is there a

00:25:09.800 question missing?

00:25:12.000 It seems like

00:25:13.140 they may have

00:25:14.840 been doing a

00:25:16.480 little thinking

00:25:19.340 past the

00:25:19.840 sale.

00:25:21.820 Is there a

00:25:22.700 missing study?

00:25:24.840 What would

00:25:25.300 be the

00:25:25.660 missing study

00:25:26.700 that would

00:25:27.140 fill in the

00:25:27.940 blanks?

00:25:29.360 Would the

00:25:29.780 missing study

00:25:30.440 be maybe

00:25:32.420 studying all

00:25:33.160 the different

00:25:33.560 kinds of

00:25:34.080 people and

00:25:34.760 asking them

00:25:35.380 directly

00:25:35.900 questions that

00:25:37.360 would get to

00:25:37.820 whether they

00:25:38.300 are angry?

00:25:40.320 I'm just

00:25:40.760 going to throw

00:25:41.060 that out

00:25:41.420 there.

00:25:42.020 Suppose you

00:25:42.500 just surveyed

00:25:43.380 everybody and

00:25:44.220 you developed

00:25:45.100 some questions

00:25:45.700 to determine

00:25:46.340 if each

00:25:46.760 group was

00:25:47.240 happy or

00:25:48.720 angry based

00:25:50.300 on their

00:25:50.620 own input.

00:25:51.600 So not based

00:25:52.100 on anybody

00:25:52.460 else's input

00:25:53.160 because that

00:25:53.640 would be

00:25:53.880 racist, but

00:25:55.660 based on their

00:25:56.960 own opinion

00:25:57.480 of themselves.

00:25:58.920 What do you

00:25:59.540 think you would

00:25:59.940 find?

00:26:01.060 Would you

00:26:01.540 find that any

00:26:02.500 group had more

00:26:03.180 anger or angry

00:26:04.520 personalities?

00:26:05.380 Well, I

00:26:06.240 don't know.

00:26:07.440 I don't know.

00:26:08.760 And let me

00:26:09.380 ask you this.

00:26:10.120 If there were

00:26:10.680 any group in

00:26:11.560 the United

00:26:11.920 States that

00:26:13.600 had a good

00:26:14.140 reason to

00:26:14.720 have some

00:26:15.640 anger, can

00:26:17.860 you think of

00:26:18.340 a group that

00:26:20.300 has more

00:26:20.820 legitimate reasons

00:26:22.220 to be pissed

00:26:22.860 off?

00:26:24.320 They do.

00:26:26.000 Now, you

00:26:26.780 might argue

00:26:27.360 that everybody

00:26:28.540 should feel the

00:26:29.720 same and be

00:26:30.480 treated the same,

00:26:31.040 opinion, but

00:26:31.900 if you, I

00:26:33.900 would imagine

00:26:34.460 if you were

00:26:35.360 a black

00:26:36.280 woman, you

00:26:36.780 have a few

00:26:37.180 things to

00:26:37.660 complain about.

00:26:39.700 Overall, I

00:26:40.620 mean, not

00:26:40.980 every person,

00:26:41.900 we're not

00:26:42.260 making any,

00:26:42.900 I'm not

00:26:43.480 making any

00:26:44.040 blanket

00:26:44.400 statements about

00:26:45.720 people.

00:26:46.380 I'm just

00:26:46.740 saying that if

00:26:47.640 you were to

00:26:47.940 study averages,

00:26:49.180 and that's

00:26:49.700 what this

00:26:50.100 Harvard Business

00:26:50.860 Review did,

00:26:51.540 it studied the

00:26:52.160 average opinion

00:26:52.940 of the

00:26:54.080 corporation.

00:26:55.000 So we're

00:26:55.220 always talking

00:26:55.640 about the

00:26:55.940 average, right?

00:26:56.540 It's not

00:26:56.840 about any

00:26:57.260 individual.

00:26:57.700 Let me ask

00:27:00.900 you, a bunch

00:27:01.560 of racists,

00:27:02.400 if you've

00:27:03.720 ever done

00:27:04.180 telephone support

00:27:05.400 calls, where

00:27:06.560 you call in to

00:27:07.300 get tech support

00:27:08.180 or customer

00:27:08.740 service, you've

00:27:09.920 probably had the

00:27:10.380 experience of

00:27:10.880 getting a variety

00:27:11.560 of people

00:27:12.020 answering the

00:27:13.340 phone.

00:27:14.940 Do you have

00:27:15.660 the racist

00:27:16.500 opinion that

00:27:18.060 black women

00:27:18.820 who do

00:27:19.380 customer service

00:27:20.300 have angry

00:27:21.480 personalities?

00:27:22.720 Go.

00:27:23.440 How racist

00:27:24.180 are you?

00:27:24.680 lots of

00:27:27.620 no's, some

00:27:28.380 yes's, mostly

00:27:29.780 no's, yes's,

00:27:31.880 no.

00:27:32.320 Now remember,

00:27:32.940 we're not

00:27:33.240 talking about

00:27:33.740 each person.

00:27:34.780 Obviously, each

00:27:35.460 person is

00:27:36.060 unique.

00:27:36.820 We all agree

00:27:37.440 on that.

00:27:38.560 But do you

00:27:39.180 see any

00:27:39.480 patterns?

00:27:42.400 No?

00:27:43.020 All right,

00:27:43.420 interesting.

00:27:44.040 So you're all

00:27:44.460 over the place.

00:27:48.060 I don't know.

00:27:50.020 Here's what I

00:27:50.720 think.

00:27:50.960 I think

00:27:53.960 that, and

00:27:57.260 I've said

00:27:57.560 this before,

00:27:59.220 everybody uses

00:28:01.100 the power

00:28:01.620 that's given

00:28:02.080 to them.

00:28:03.520 That's a

00:28:04.100 general statement

00:28:04.900 you'd probably

00:28:05.380 agree with,

00:28:05.840 right?

00:28:06.120 If somebody

00:28:06.740 has a lot

00:28:07.140 of money,

00:28:07.980 that's a

00:28:08.680 form of

00:28:09.100 power, and

00:28:09.500 they'd

00:28:09.700 probably use

00:28:10.200 it in

00:28:11.280 ways that

00:28:11.800 increase

00:28:12.240 their

00:28:12.400 power.

00:28:16.380 And if

00:28:18.140 people have,

00:28:18.740 let's say,

00:28:19.080 physical

00:28:19.660 power, like

00:28:21.000 they're big

00:28:21.380 intimidating

00:28:21.920 people, usually

00:28:22.820 male, but

00:28:23.840 let's say

00:28:24.060 you're like a

00:28:24.520 big intimidating

00:28:25.180 person like

00:28:25.960 Larry Ellison

00:28:27.180 or, you

00:28:28.400 know, something

00:28:28.680 like that.

00:28:29.060 I've heard

00:28:29.560 that some

00:28:30.640 large males

00:28:31.660 are just

00:28:32.700 physically

00:28:33.160 intimidating,

00:28:34.620 and so

00:28:34.920 that's sort

00:28:35.240 of a power

00:28:35.700 that they

00:28:36.080 can wield

00:28:36.700 over people.

00:28:38.400 So, generally

00:28:39.120 speaking, when

00:28:40.880 people have

00:28:41.580 power, they

00:28:42.080 use it,

00:28:42.460 wouldn't you

00:28:42.740 say?

00:28:43.460 Is it fair

00:28:44.120 to say that

00:28:44.620 if you have

00:28:45.160 a power,

00:28:46.300 you use it,

00:28:47.400 on average?

00:28:49.080 So, one

00:28:50.440 power that

00:28:50.920 women have

00:28:51.520 that men

00:28:51.900 don't have

00:28:52.480 is that

00:28:53.620 they can

00:28:54.200 go hard

00:28:55.080 at men

00:28:55.640 without

00:28:56.660 worrying

00:28:57.340 about

00:28:57.700 consequences.

00:29:00.200 Now, of

00:29:00.520 course, there's

00:29:00.960 exceptions and

00:29:01.860 abusive men and

00:29:02.920 stuff, so

00:29:03.400 certainly there

00:29:04.280 are women who

00:29:04.740 can't complain

00:29:05.340 without getting

00:29:06.240 beaten up.

00:29:07.940 So, we're not

00:29:08.300 talking about

00:29:08.720 that.

00:29:09.440 But, generally,

00:29:10.260 in your average

00:29:11.040 marriage, the

00:29:13.340 woman can be

00:29:14.360 a total bitch

00:29:15.820 and get away

00:29:16.980 with it.

00:29:17.400 Because men

00:29:18.060 will be like,

00:29:18.620 ugh, I don't

00:29:19.200 want to deal

00:29:19.600 with a divorce

00:29:20.880 and losing my

00:29:21.680 children.

00:29:22.860 Yes, she's a

00:29:23.460 total bitch.

00:29:24.180 There's nothing

00:29:24.780 I can do

00:29:25.200 about it.

00:29:25.780 There's absolutely

00:29:26.380 nothing I can do

00:29:27.000 about it.

00:29:27.720 Then the woman

00:29:28.260 says, well, I

00:29:29.020 could be a

00:29:29.400 total bitch, and

00:29:30.880 nobody's going to

00:29:31.740 change any of my

00:29:32.580 situation.

00:29:33.860 I'm mad, so I'll

00:29:35.140 be a total bitch.

00:29:36.700 So, generally

00:29:37.560 speaking, women

00:29:38.460 have a power that

00:29:39.800 men don't have,

00:29:40.640 which is a

00:29:41.420 certain kind of

00:29:42.400 complaining.

00:29:44.060 You know, men

00:29:44.380 can complain too,

00:29:45.360 but it's not

00:29:46.720 going to make

00:29:47.020 any difference.

00:29:49.100 When women

00:29:49.820 complain, it's

00:29:50.400 more likely to

00:29:51.080 have some

00:29:51.380 effect, right?

00:29:52.360 Especially in

00:29:52.960 relationships.

00:29:55.620 Now, add on

00:29:58.480 top of that,

00:30:01.800 you know, any

00:30:02.500 cultural impact,

00:30:04.240 and it seems to

00:30:05.160 me that some

00:30:05.840 groups would

00:30:07.200 just have more

00:30:07.820 power to

00:30:08.640 complain.

00:30:09.140 and everybody

00:30:11.380 uses their

00:30:11.960 power.

00:30:13.400 So, you

00:30:14.420 could make a

00:30:14.960 case, and

00:30:15.440 again, this is

00:30:15.940 just, you

00:30:16.400 know, racist

00:30:16.920 speculation

00:30:17.680 probably, but

00:30:19.080 wouldn't you

00:30:19.600 imagine that

00:30:20.280 black women

00:30:20.800 have the most

00:30:21.400 power to

00:30:22.280 complain?

00:30:24.320 Let me just

00:30:25.000 put that out

00:30:25.480 there.

00:30:26.140 Would a black

00:30:26.820 woman have the

00:30:27.480 most power in

00:30:29.260 society to

00:30:30.840 complain?

00:30:32.100 I would say

00:30:32.880 yes, because

00:30:34.400 they would be

00:30:34.960 considered among

00:30:35.900 the most

00:30:36.460 discriminated

00:30:37.820 against group.

00:30:39.140 You know, you

00:30:40.220 got your

00:30:40.680 black, you

00:30:41.240 got your

00:30:41.520 woman, you

00:30:42.020 put them

00:30:42.280 together, you

00:30:43.980 know, you

00:30:44.560 have a reason

00:30:45.280 to have some,

00:30:48.220 you know, maybe

00:30:48.920 attitude.

00:30:50.440 So, if

00:30:51.900 somebody has a

00:30:52.540 really good

00:30:52.920 reason for

00:30:54.020 being the way

00:30:54.480 they are, it

00:30:55.280 shouldn't be a

00:30:55.700 surprise that

00:30:56.420 they're that

00:30:56.740 way.

00:30:57.040 Everybody uses

00:30:57.620 the power

00:30:57.980 they have.

00:30:58.920 If I had

00:31:00.520 the power of

00:31:02.360 being able to

00:31:03.060 complain about

00:31:03.920 my victimhood

00:31:04.760 and it got me

00:31:05.600 stuff, I'd

00:31:06.720 probably do it.

00:31:07.300 if that's

00:31:09.260 just the way

00:31:09.720 I could get

00:31:10.220 stuff.

00:31:11.100 Now, it

00:31:11.480 turns out that

00:31:12.080 it wouldn't

00:31:12.420 work for me.

00:31:13.800 You know, as

00:31:14.240 a white guy, I

00:31:15.160 can complain all

00:31:15.840 day about

00:31:16.420 racism against

00:31:18.180 me.

00:31:18.820 Well, it

00:31:19.280 doesn't work.

00:31:21.240 So, let me

00:31:22.200 say that again.

00:31:22.800 The only reason

00:31:24.000 that I'm not an

00:31:25.040 angry personality

00:31:26.260 and I'm not

00:31:27.740 complaining and

00:31:28.500 bitching and

00:31:29.100 abusing people

00:31:29.860 every time I

00:31:30.380 have a

00:31:30.960 conversation is

00:31:31.960 because I can't

00:31:32.460 get away with

00:31:32.980 it.

00:31:33.800 That's it.

00:31:34.400 If I could

00:31:35.400 get away with

00:31:36.100 being an

00:31:36.480 asshole, I

00:31:36.980 probably would

00:31:38.140 drift in that

00:31:39.340 direction.

00:31:41.200 I mean, most

00:31:41.940 people would.

00:31:43.080 You drift in the

00:31:43.920 direction of your

00:31:44.620 own power.

00:31:46.160 So, if you

00:31:47.280 happen to be the

00:31:48.020 group that can

00:31:49.080 complain the

00:31:49.760 most and

00:31:51.520 other people

00:31:52.040 say, yeah, I

00:31:52.920 can see why you

00:31:53.600 would complain

00:31:54.080 the most, well,

00:31:56.060 you can understand

00:31:57.840 how that situation

00:31:58.620 might evolve.

00:32:00.340 But, again, if

00:32:01.680 you're dealing

00:32:02.160 with anecdotal

00:32:02.960 evidence, there's

00:32:03.640 no evidence

00:32:04.480 that black

00:32:05.000 women are more

00:32:05.640 angry personalities,

00:32:06.800 in my opinion.

00:32:07.680 There's only

00:32:08.180 evidence that

00:32:08.820 people believe

00:32:09.480 it.

00:32:11.100 Let me say

00:32:11.540 that again.

00:32:12.520 There's no

00:32:12.920 evidence that

00:32:13.640 black women are

00:32:14.920 angry personalities

00:32:15.900 that I'm aware

00:32:17.380 of.

00:32:17.640 I haven't seen

00:32:18.100 a study that

00:32:18.760 says that.

00:32:19.480 The study said

00:32:20.140 that people

00:32:20.540 think it's

00:32:21.140 true, which

00:32:22.260 is completely

00:32:22.760 different.

00:32:25.440 All right,

00:32:28.640 here's my

00:32:29.020 favorite story.

00:32:29.860 There were two

00:32:30.260 big game hunters,

00:32:31.660 Lawrence and

00:32:32.100 Bianca Rudolph,

00:32:32.760 and they've

00:32:33.540 been shooting

00:32:34.100 big animals in

00:32:34.940 Africa for

00:32:35.440 years.

00:32:36.460 They were both

00:32:36.860 in their 60s,

00:32:37.540 I think.

00:32:38.580 But in

00:32:40.780 2016, they

00:32:41.940 were going to

00:32:43.060 try to get a

00:32:43.540 leopard.

00:32:43.960 I guess the

00:32:44.440 wife wanted to

00:32:45.320 shoot a leopard.

00:32:46.820 And she was

00:32:47.380 out hunting all

00:32:47.980 day and did not

00:32:48.680 shoot any leopards.

00:32:49.880 She shot a

00:32:50.720 number of other

00:32:51.240 animals, but no

00:32:52.480 leopard.

00:32:53.560 But then when

00:32:54.260 they got back to

00:32:54.820 the cabin, when

00:32:56.040 the husband was in

00:32:56.820 a different room,

00:32:57.480 he says, there

00:32:59.060 was a shotgun

00:33:00.600 went off and it

00:33:01.540 killed the wife.

00:33:03.440 So she was

00:33:04.180 found dead.

00:33:04.680 Now the

00:33:04.860 husband, Lawrence

00:33:06.240 Rudolph, he's

00:33:07.780 charged with

00:33:08.300 murder, but he

00:33:10.280 says that the

00:33:11.420 gun went off by

00:33:12.140 accident.

00:33:13.140 Now, I haven't

00:33:14.460 looked into the

00:33:15.020 details of this

00:33:15.600 story, but here's

00:33:16.580 how I'd have

00:33:17.480 handled it.

00:33:18.800 First of all, the

00:33:19.640 top suspects would

00:33:20.640 be the leopards

00:33:21.400 themselves.

00:33:23.200 So there were

00:33:25.080 no witnesses, and

00:33:26.340 we know that the

00:33:27.040 leopards had a

00:33:27.880 motive.

00:33:29.440 So if I were the

00:33:30.380 leopards, I would

00:33:31.000 have tried to send

00:33:31.900 his squad of

00:33:32.780 leopards in to

00:33:34.320 shoot this woman

00:33:35.160 and maybe save

00:33:36.580 the other leopards.

00:33:39.580 If I were the

00:33:40.360 investigators, once I

00:33:42.460 came upon the

00:33:43.100 crime scene, probably

00:33:45.460 what they did is the

00:33:46.260 way they usually

00:33:46.940 handle it, you

00:33:47.600 know, they clean

00:33:48.260 it up, you know,

00:33:49.160 take pictures, do

00:33:50.300 what they can.

00:33:51.080 But I would have

00:33:51.920 waited a week.

00:33:52.600 just to see if

00:33:56.300 the husband mounted

00:33:57.080 her head on the

00:33:57.720 wall, because that

00:33:59.020 would be evidence

00:34:00.380 of intent.

00:34:03.260 That's just me.

00:34:04.660 But, you know, if

00:34:05.560 you found her head

00:34:06.120 on the wall a week

00:34:06.820 later, I'd say, I

00:34:07.680 feel like I know

00:34:08.760 what happened now.

00:34:10.040 That explains a lot.

00:34:12.300 I would like to add

00:34:13.240 on top of that,

00:34:14.140 normally I do not

00:34:15.500 talk about tragic

00:34:16.900 situations that

00:34:17.920 happen to

00:34:18.280 individuals.

00:34:19.240 But if your

00:34:20.580 hobby is shooting

00:34:21.720 mammals,

00:34:22.600 and you get

00:34:23.480 your own head

00:34:24.000 blown off, I

00:34:25.180 don't really care.

00:34:26.720 I don't really

00:34:27.300 care at all.

00:34:28.760 Oh, yeah, if the

00:34:29.780 shotgun blow was in

00:34:30.760 the head, then we

00:34:31.740 could eliminate the

00:34:32.780 husband, because he

00:34:34.300 wouldn't have a

00:34:34.740 trophy.

00:34:36.820 So that would be

00:34:37.560 evidence, too.

00:34:38.800 So let me be as

00:34:39.660 clear as possible.

00:34:40.520 If you shoot large

00:34:41.660 mammals for fun, I

00:34:43.240 don't fucking care

00:34:43.840 what happens to you.

00:34:45.080 I don't care at

00:34:45.840 all.

00:34:46.400 I don't care if you

00:34:47.000 got shot in the

00:34:47.640 back of the head.

00:34:48.480 I don't care if you

00:34:49.600 suffered and died.

00:34:50.580 I don't care if the

00:34:51.280 elephants,

00:34:52.100 stomp on you.

00:34:53.560 I don't care if the

00:34:54.160 lepers eat you.

00:34:55.700 If that's your

00:34:56.500 hobby, it's your

00:34:58.940 own fucking

00:34:59.360 problem, right?

00:35:00.660 I don't care.

00:35:01.540 I have no sympathy

00:35:02.500 whatsoever for

00:35:04.200 Bianca Rudolph.

00:35:05.440 Fuck her.

00:35:06.020 She can go to hell

00:35:06.800 and rot.

00:35:08.600 I don't normally say

00:35:09.740 that about people who

00:35:10.480 have tragic accidents,

00:35:11.720 but especially if they

00:35:13.940 might have been

00:35:14.360 murdered, I usually

00:35:15.880 don't condemn the

00:35:17.700 victim, but fuck

00:35:19.100 this victim.

00:35:20.520 Fuck her to hell.

00:35:22.080 She can rot.

00:35:24.320 All right.

00:35:24.800 That's just my

00:35:25.420 opinion.

00:35:27.780 How many of you

00:35:28.600 think that, I

00:35:31.280 don't know,

00:35:31.520 Democrats and

00:35:32.180 liberals want to

00:35:32.860 depopulate the

00:35:33.640 world?

00:35:39.240 You think the

00:35:40.440 Democrats want to

00:35:41.560 depopulate the

00:35:42.360 world?

00:35:42.540 Do you think Bill

00:35:44.000 Gates wants to

00:35:44.740 depopulate the

00:35:45.500 world?

00:35:45.680 Here's what I

00:35:48.240 think everybody

00:35:48.900 gets wrong.

00:35:51.580 There's nobody

00:35:52.380 smart enough to

00:35:53.340 be playing at

00:35:53.940 that level, at

00:35:55.840 the Bill Gates

00:35:56.440 level.

00:35:57.540 Let's say, imagine

00:35:58.600 the people who

00:35:59.340 are at that level

00:36:00.080 you think are

00:36:00.680 trying to depopulate

00:36:01.680 the world.

00:36:02.940 So in your

00:36:03.520 opinion, you

00:36:04.160 might put Bill

00:36:04.740 Gates there,

00:36:06.080 you know, Klaus,

00:36:07.040 whatever his name

00:36:07.640 is, Schwab,

00:36:08.980 right?

00:36:09.540 So all these

00:36:10.580 people, but these

00:36:11.280 are the well-informed

00:36:12.920 elites, wouldn't

00:36:14.540 you say?

00:36:15.260 Soros.

00:36:16.120 So you would

00:36:17.040 put them in

00:36:17.480 that category of

00:36:18.400 people that you

00:36:18.960 believe want to

00:36:20.840 depopulate the

00:36:21.620 world, correct?

00:36:23.940 Now, how do you

00:36:24.740 explain that those

00:36:25.580 billionaires think

00:36:26.700 that we're better

00:36:27.340 off with less

00:36:28.780 population, but

00:36:30.460 Elon Musk, who

00:36:31.680 is also very smart

00:36:32.620 and a billionaire,

00:36:33.780 says that it's

00:36:34.500 essential to have

00:36:35.460 a growing population.

00:36:36.820 It's not just

00:36:37.640 optional, it's

00:36:38.180 essential.

00:36:39.360 You need a

00:36:40.080 growing population

00:36:40.840 or else you're

00:36:41.280 really in trouble.

00:36:43.180 So how could

00:36:44.020 these other

00:36:44.520 billionaires, like

00:36:45.240 Klaus, Schwab,

00:36:46.380 and Gates, how

00:36:47.320 could they be so

00:36:48.020 wrong if Musk

00:36:51.000 is right or

00:36:51.520 vice versa?

00:36:53.620 Let me tell you

00:36:54.520 what I'm pretty

00:36:55.220 sure is true.

00:36:57.120 So without

00:36:58.000 knowing, I'm

00:36:59.960 going to make the

00:37:00.580 following assertion,

00:37:01.500 that Musk and

00:37:03.180 Gates agree on

00:37:04.220 population.

00:37:06.560 And here's what I

00:37:07.520 mean by that.

00:37:08.180 I believe that

00:37:08.820 everybody smart

00:37:09.680 thinks that

00:37:10.440 population has to

00:37:11.460 grow to have a

00:37:13.140 healthy world.

00:37:14.600 Let me say it

00:37:15.140 again.

00:37:16.200 I believe that

00:37:17.120 everybody above a

00:37:18.380 certain level of

00:37:19.460 awareness and

00:37:20.180 intelligence,

00:37:21.040 everybody, everybody,

00:37:22.640 100%, above a

00:37:24.080 certain level of

00:37:24.740 awareness,

00:37:25.640 understands that we

00:37:27.240 need a growing

00:37:27.820 population.

00:37:28.440 everybody below

00:37:30.420 that level of

00:37:31.140 awareness could

00:37:32.260 be, you know,

00:37:33.040 any opinion.

00:37:34.640 But above a

00:37:35.460 certain level of

00:37:36.520 knowledge and

00:37:37.460 education, everybody

00:37:38.940 knows it has to

00:37:39.720 grow.

00:37:40.940 And Bill Gates is

00:37:42.000 above that level, as

00:37:43.360 is Klaus Schwab, as

00:37:45.180 are all the elites.

00:37:46.480 There are no elites

00:37:47.600 who think the world

00:37:48.320 needs to have less

00:37:48.980 population.

00:37:50.980 You can't find any

00:37:52.320 who say that.

00:37:53.520 None.

00:37:53.840 You will find lots

00:37:56.480 of people who think

00:37:57.200 population growth

00:37:58.700 needs, Bill Maher

00:38:01.640 is not somebody I

00:38:02.520 would consider well

00:38:03.300 informed on this

00:38:04.280 topic.

00:38:05.720 Bill Maher

00:38:06.420 continuously makes

00:38:08.140 economic assumptions

00:38:10.500 that I think are

00:38:11.860 under-informed.

00:38:13.360 I think that's his

00:38:14.120 weakest spot.

00:38:16.660 Now, I have a very

00:38:17.780 positive opinion of

00:38:18.700 Bill Maher as a

00:38:20.480 public personality

00:38:22.040 and person who

00:38:22.780 talks about the

00:38:23.440 news, and in my

00:38:24.860 opinion, with the

00:38:25.980 exception of Trump

00:38:26.760 commentary, he's

00:38:28.420 clearly biased.

00:38:29.260 That's a little bit

00:38:29.740 personal.

00:38:31.200 But generally

00:38:31.840 speaking, he's

00:38:33.820 telling you his

00:38:34.320 actual opinion.

00:38:35.100 It's not bullshit.

00:38:36.200 But I don't think he

00:38:37.120 has enough

00:38:38.060 understanding of

00:38:38.860 economics to be

00:38:40.820 good in that realm.

00:38:42.480 So when he has an

00:38:43.200 economic opinion,

00:38:44.240 it's generally not

00:38:46.260 one I would look to.

00:38:47.580 Now, if you put

00:38:48.340 Bill Maher in the

00:38:49.080 room with either

00:38:49.780 Elon Musk or

00:38:51.580 Bill Gates, do you

00:38:53.380 think that Bill

00:38:54.860 Maher is

00:38:55.380 operating at the

00:38:56.060 same level of

00:38:56.840 awareness and

00:38:57.840 understanding of the

00:38:58.800 world?

00:38:59.500 I don't.

00:39:00.700 I don't think it's

00:39:01.280 even close.

00:39:02.980 If you did an

00:39:03.960 economics test of

00:39:06.060 Bill Maher versus

00:39:07.220 Bill Gates, let's

00:39:08.540 say it's just a

00:39:09.280 standardized test

00:39:10.640 understanding economic

00:39:12.040 principles, Bill

00:39:13.760 Gates would get

00:39:14.360 every question

00:39:15.040 right.

00:39:15.680 Like every question.

00:39:17.620 He would understand

00:39:18.620 everything about

00:39:19.420 economics, at least

00:39:20.340 that would be put on

00:39:21.160 the test.

00:39:22.520 Bill Maher would

00:39:23.960 get a, he'd

00:39:25.720 probably get a

00:39:26.120 75, 75% right.

00:39:28.980 But that 25% he

00:39:30.240 missed is a big

00:39:30.940 deal.

00:39:32.220 You know, and

00:39:32.580 that's the part I

00:39:33.180 seem to notice when

00:39:34.200 he's got a gap in

00:39:35.440 his understanding.

00:39:36.500 So yes, there are

00:39:37.540 some people at a

00:39:38.420 lower level of

00:39:39.300 understanding of the

00:39:39.960 world who think that

00:39:41.000 we might be better

00:39:41.680 off with fewer

00:39:42.620 people.

00:39:44.160 But what, the

00:39:45.620 thing that you're

00:39:46.220 conflating that

00:39:47.920 makes you think that

00:39:48.820 the smart people

00:39:49.760 who understand

00:39:50.900 economics are also

00:39:52.560 agreeing with Bill

00:39:53.360 Maher, here's

00:39:54.460 what's confusing

00:39:55.140 you.

00:39:56.320 They do want to

00:39:57.560 control the

00:39:58.020 population.

00:39:59.680 They do.

00:40:00.860 So Bill Gates

00:40:01.480 definitely wants

00:40:03.060 individuals to have

00:40:04.220 control over their

00:40:05.100 own reproduction,

00:40:07.060 which might have

00:40:07.980 the effect of

00:40:08.600 lessening it in

00:40:09.440 some places.

00:40:10.640 So they want

00:40:11.420 people to control

00:40:12.140 it, but there's

00:40:13.400 no way that Bill

00:40:14.580 Gates wants the

00:40:15.300 population of the

00:40:16.040 world to shrink.

00:40:17.500 Would anybody

00:40:17.920 like to make a bet

00:40:18.680 on that?

00:40:20.360 Would anybody

00:40:21.040 like to make a bet

00:40:21.860 that you will never

00:40:22.700 see a Bill Gates

00:40:23.680 quote and that

00:40:24.500 none exists, there's

00:40:25.760 no Bill Gates

00:40:26.420 quote, about

00:40:27.480 reducing the

00:40:28.460 population of the

00:40:29.860 whole world?

00:40:34.040 So you'll take

00:40:34.880 that bet?

00:40:36.320 Now remember,

00:40:38.340 the bet is that

00:40:39.360 you believe he

00:40:42.500 wants fewer

00:40:43.380 people.

00:40:43.800 I'm saying he

00:40:44.760 wants the growth

00:40:45.980 rate to be more

00:40:47.900 managed.

00:40:48.680 So he wants

00:40:51.400 more, but at a

00:40:52.540 more manageable

00:40:53.320 way and, you

00:40:54.980 know, that it

00:40:56.100 makes sense for

00:40:56.660 the country.

00:40:59.680 Yeah.

00:41:01.320 All right.

00:41:03.900 Yes, and Bill

00:41:04.900 Maher doesn't

00:41:05.480 understand how

00:41:06.180 technology will

00:41:07.080 improve resource

00:41:08.040 management, and

00:41:08.920 Musk does.

00:41:09.760 That is exactly

00:41:10.600 correct.

00:41:11.660 Exactly.

00:41:12.180 Yeah, I know it

00:41:18.620 causes a lot of

00:41:19.220 trouble when I

00:41:19.840 defend Bill Gates,

00:41:20.980 but keep in mind

00:41:21.940 that I don't

00:41:23.040 defend Bill Gates

00:41:24.040 for a love of

00:41:25.340 Bill Gates.

00:41:26.820 Whatever he's done

00:41:27.640 in his personal or

00:41:28.640 professional life,

00:41:29.640 you know, that's up

00:41:30.140 to him to explain.

00:41:31.020 That's not up to

00:41:31.700 me.

00:41:32.540 What I try to work

00:41:33.920 on is how we

00:41:34.840 think about it.

00:41:35.980 So I'm not

00:41:36.600 defending Bill Gates,

00:41:37.480 I'm defending

00:41:38.100 accurate thinking.

00:41:42.180 And I believe

00:41:42.900 that accurate

00:41:43.440 thinking says

00:41:44.200 there's no

00:41:44.600 evidence that

00:41:45.220 anybody as

00:41:45.960 smart as him

00:41:46.760 would ever be

00:41:48.060 on the side of

00:41:48.680 population reduction.

00:41:50.700 So let me

00:41:51.120 generalize it.

00:41:51.880 I'm going to

00:41:52.220 generalize it from

00:41:53.180 the Bill Gates

00:41:53.940 because he just

00:41:54.640 he confuses the

00:41:56.060 question because

00:41:56.580 you have so many

00:41:57.060 opinions about him.

00:41:58.520 Nobody who

00:41:59.680 understands economics

00:42:00.820 and technology,

00:42:02.180 let's put it that

00:42:03.000 way, nobody has a

00:42:04.320 good understanding

00:42:04.960 of both economics

00:42:06.840 and technology

00:42:07.740 believes that the

00:42:09.320 population should be

00:42:10.260 reduced.

00:42:12.080 Find me one

00:42:12.880 example and I'll

00:42:13.600 change my mind.

00:42:14.960 It's got somebody

00:42:15.820 prominent that you

00:42:16.940 could clearly say,

00:42:18.360 okay, this person

00:42:19.180 does understand

00:42:20.060 economics and does

00:42:21.280 understand business,

00:42:22.380 does understand

00:42:23.060 people, you know,

00:42:24.360 does understand

00:42:25.300 all that.

00:42:27.060 Hitler.

00:42:29.040 Well, Hitler's not

00:42:30.160 if Hitler's the best

00:42:31.500 example you have.

00:42:34.340 Well, let me

00:42:35.120 correct you.

00:42:35.620 Hitler did not

00:42:36.240 believe in

00:42:37.820 population reduction.

00:42:40.220 He believed in

00:42:41.200 reducing some kind

00:42:42.240 of people and

00:42:42.860 increasing the kind

00:42:43.940 of people he is.

00:42:45.200 So even Hitler

00:42:45.860 isn't a good

00:42:46.700 example.

00:42:49.160 And even,

00:42:50.300 and China is an

00:42:52.660 example of

00:42:53.460 controlled

00:42:54.440 population.

00:42:57.700 China wasn't

00:42:58.540 trying to,

00:42:59.340 was trying to

00:43:00.360 not have runaway

00:43:01.820 population growth,

00:43:03.600 but they didn't

00:43:04.400 want it to be

00:43:04.880 negative too hard.

00:43:06.740 They wanted to

00:43:07.400 slow it until

00:43:08.140 they could handle

00:43:09.800 it, which is

00:43:10.940 what they did.

00:43:11.640 So now they've

00:43:12.300 increased the

00:43:13.200 number of kids

00:43:13.640 you can have.

00:43:15.180 So, yeah,

00:43:16.780 and by China

00:43:18.080 reducing their

00:43:19.260 growth rate,

00:43:21.120 they may have

00:43:21.780 killed themselves

00:43:22.460 in the long run

00:43:23.160 because they've

00:43:23.580 got this

00:43:23.880 demographic bomb.

00:43:25.940 Now, do you

00:43:27.140 understand why

00:43:27.720 you have to have

00:43:28.380 more people?

00:43:30.100 Because you can't

00:43:31.020 have a growing

00:43:31.560 number of old

00:43:32.220 people who don't

00:43:32.860 work and a shrinking

00:43:34.320 number of new

00:43:35.040 people who do.

00:43:36.840 That leads you

00:43:37.920 to a bad

00:43:39.000 situation.

00:43:42.600 Yeah, yeah,

00:43:43.460 Japan has that

00:43:44.080 problem too.

00:43:44.960 So we don't

00:43:45.520 want the problem

00:43:46.060 of Japan and

00:43:47.120 of China, but

00:43:48.740 the United States

00:43:49.400 never had an

00:43:50.060 overpopulation

00:43:50.840 problem, so we

00:43:51.600 didn't have to

00:43:52.000 deal with that.

00:43:55.060 Yeah, I do

00:43:55.740 think more old

00:43:56.340 people will work.

00:43:57.020 That is part of

00:43:57.480 the solution,

00:43:58.200 definitely.

00:43:59.700 All right, do

00:44:01.020 you think China

00:44:01.540 will shoot down

00:44:02.140 Pelosi's plane?

00:44:05.340 Gordon Chang

00:44:06.260 thinks it's

00:44:08.180 possible, or he

00:44:09.240 said that.

00:44:10.840 It's not

00:44:11.480 possible.

00:44:12.880 Yeah.

00:44:14.620 I'm the biggest

00:44:15.540 China hawk

00:44:16.700 probably that you've

00:44:18.300 ever seen, and

00:44:19.580 even I don't think

00:44:20.320 they'll shoot down

00:44:20.920 Nancy Pelosi's

00:44:21.760 jet.

00:44:26.820 Taiwan on,

00:44:27.760 yeah.

00:44:27.980 Yeah.

00:44:31.540 All right.

00:44:32.920 Yeah, I don't

00:44:33.480 think that's

00:44:33.860 happened.

00:44:34.160 I'm not going

00:44:34.420 to worry about

00:44:34.760 it.

00:44:37.940 All right, that

00:44:38.880 is the slow

00:44:40.060 news day news.

00:44:43.100 Do you have

00:44:43.500 any interesting

00:44:44.100 questions?

00:44:46.140 Does it look

00:44:46.760 like Africa?

00:44:47.840 Yeah, so I'm

00:44:48.440 intentionally

00:44:48.880 obscuring my

00:44:50.040 face like a

00:44:50.940 witness protection.

00:44:55.220 have I ever

00:45:02.300 talked to

00:45:02.740 Penn Jillette

00:45:03.380 about Trump?

00:45:07.240 I didn't

00:45:08.100 get to meet

00:45:08.860 and talk to

00:45:09.480 Penn Jillette.

00:45:10.000 I don't

00:45:10.180 think we

00:45:10.500 ever talked

00:45:10.860 about Trump.

00:45:15.660 Jim

00:45:16.080 encounter?

00:45:17.020 I did not

00:45:17.600 see your post

00:45:18.200 about a

00:45:18.560 Jim

00:45:18.740 encounter.

00:45:19.220 Russell

00:45:24.880 Brand.

00:45:25.340 Oh, I did

00:45:26.160 give Russell

00:45:27.060 Brand's

00:45:27.500 producer some

00:45:28.400 dates for

00:45:30.160 scheduling, but

00:45:30.780 I haven't heard

00:45:31.240 back, or at

00:45:32.340 least I have to

00:45:32.940 check back.

00:45:35.240 Oh, I

00:45:35.720 forgot about

00:45:36.200 Biden getting

00:45:37.380 COVID a second

00:45:38.140 time.

00:45:38.640 If you're

00:45:39.620 keeping score,

00:45:41.720 Biden has

00:45:43.260 four vaccinations

00:45:44.360 and two

00:45:45.180 COVID infections.

00:45:46.960 So the

00:45:47.240 score is

00:45:47.820 vaccinations

00:45:48.840 for COVID

00:45:50.440 too, but

00:45:52.140 I think

00:45:52.500 COVID can

00:45:53.100 come from

00:45:53.520 behind and

00:45:54.300 maybe soon

00:45:55.900 we'll have

00:45:56.220 more infections

00:45:56.940 than there

00:45:57.440 are vaccinations.

00:46:01.500 Now, how

00:46:02.120 many of you

00:46:02.780 accept the

00:46:04.280 following logic?

00:46:06.420 That if the

00:46:07.200 vaccinations and

00:46:08.260 YouTube, if

00:46:09.460 you're watching,

00:46:10.000 don't cancel

00:46:10.500 me over this,

00:46:11.280 wait until I

00:46:12.000 get to the

00:46:12.360 end and

00:46:13.140 you'll be

00:46:13.420 happy.

00:46:14.520 How many

00:46:15.140 people think

00:46:15.620 the following

00:46:16.140 logic holds?

00:46:18.140 And it

00:46:18.320 goes like

00:46:18.700 this.

00:46:19.620 If the

00:46:20.320 vaccinations

00:46:20.900 don't stop

00:46:22.220 you from

00:46:22.560 getting it

00:46:23.140 and they

00:46:24.060 don't stop

00:46:24.560 you from

00:46:24.860 getting it

00:46:25.280 a second

00:46:25.640 time, and

00:46:28.780 it doesn't

00:46:29.140 stop you

00:46:29.540 from transmitting

00:46:30.280 it, then

00:46:31.780 it doesn't

00:46:32.240 work.

00:46:33.660 Yes or

00:46:34.280 no?

00:46:35.180 If it

00:46:35.780 doesn't stop

00:46:36.380 you from

00:46:36.700 getting it,

00:46:37.220 it doesn't

00:46:37.480 stop you from

00:46:38.080 transmitting

00:46:38.560 it, it

00:46:42.160 doesn't work.

00:46:45.300 Somebody

00:46:45.780 says not as

00:46:46.500 a vaccine,

00:46:47.420 okay, fair

00:46:48.000 enough.

00:46:50.220 Define

00:46:50.700 work, okay.

00:46:53.280 You know,

00:46:53.820 really this

00:46:54.840 group is, I

00:46:56.300 think, the

00:46:56.700 most sophisticated

00:46:57.580 audience watching

00:46:59.380 the news,

00:47:00.020 honestly, because

00:47:01.140 I thought there

00:47:02.100 would be a few

00:47:02.740 more of you

00:47:03.300 agreeing with

00:47:03.900 that, and it

00:47:04.260 makes no sense,

00:47:05.040 right?

00:47:06.060 If you know

00:47:06.880 that it's

00:47:07.540 reducing the

00:47:08.700 severity of

00:47:09.260 infection, then

00:47:10.980 you would have

00:47:11.380 to make an

00:47:11.800 argument that

00:47:12.540 the side

00:47:14.040 effects from

00:47:14.540 the vaccination

00:47:15.100 are worse

00:47:16.040 than however

00:47:17.640 much it

00:47:18.100 saves you.

00:47:18.720 Now, I

00:47:19.000 don't know if

00:47:19.280 that's true.

00:47:20.600 Now, if you

00:47:21.000 said to me, I

00:47:21.560 don't believe

00:47:22.140 the studies, and

00:47:23.840 I don't believe

00:47:24.540 that you're

00:47:25.140 reducing more

00:47:25.980 problem than

00:47:27.660 you're causing

00:47:28.240 with any side

00:47:28.940 effects, I

00:47:30.760 don't know that

00:47:31.160 we could believe

00:47:31.600 that.

00:47:34.360 Oh, they

00:47:34.900 think, did I

00:47:35.620 ask the question

00:47:36.200 wrong, so it

00:47:36.760 looks like they're

00:47:37.280 agreeing to the

00:47:37.840 wrong thing?

00:47:39.160 Maybe.

00:47:39.560 Well, the

00:47:43.740 discussion that

00:47:44.460 matters is

00:47:45.200 long COVID, and

00:47:47.360 whether the

00:47:48.020 vaccination

00:47:49.020 anecdotal

00:47:50.140 information is

00:47:50.900 telling you

00:47:51.280 anything.

00:47:52.280 All right, here's

00:47:52.680 a question I

00:47:53.200 asked just

00:47:53.700 before I got

00:47:54.240 on, and

00:47:54.920 let's see how

00:47:55.320 the, I did a

00:47:56.160 little poll.

00:47:57.820 Let's see how

00:47:58.520 I did, we'll

00:47:59.520 see how you do

00:48:00.220 on this poll.

00:48:02.440 So I did this

00:48:03.300 just before I got

00:48:04.200 on here, so I

00:48:05.000 didn't see any

00:48:05.700 answers yet.

00:48:08.380 And the

00:48:08.900 answers are,

00:48:09.560 so I said

00:48:12.220 this, what

00:48:12.720 does it mean

00:48:13.340 when there, what

00:48:14.220 does it mean, so

00:48:15.000 you get to

00:48:15.460 interpret this, what

00:48:16.980 does it mean when

00:48:17.560 there is a

00:48:17.960 mountain of

00:48:18.500 anecdotal

00:48:19.260 evidence on

00:48:20.300 Twitter, the

00:48:21.540 shots, the

00:48:22.620 vaccination

00:48:23.080 shots, allegedly

00:48:24.340 caused dozens

00:48:25.180 of different

00:48:25.760 medical problems?

00:48:27.080 Now, here's the

00:48:27.640 important part, not

00:48:29.100 medical problems, but

00:48:30.960 dozens of

00:48:31.780 different ones.

00:48:33.560 So if you

00:48:34.020 were a doctor, how

00:48:34.860 would you process

00:48:36.740 that?

00:48:37.680 It's anecdotal, so

00:48:38.920 it's not a

00:48:39.420 study, but there

00:48:41.480 seemed to be a

00:48:42.040 lot of them, on

00:48:42.900 Twitter anyway.

00:48:44.660 But of course

00:48:45.340 Twitter is

00:48:45.900 everybody in the

00:48:47.300 world, so there

00:48:48.660 are a lot of

00:48:49.060 people that they

00:48:49.740 could notice.

00:48:51.640 Do you think

00:48:52.760 they're seeing

00:48:53.140 that there are

00:48:53.740 dozens of

00:48:54.640 different medical

00:48:55.220 problems that

00:48:56.860 people are

00:48:57.260 associating with

00:48:58.220 this shot, whether

00:48:59.420 it's proven or

00:49:00.080 not, people are

00:49:00.800 saying that?

00:49:02.300 Is it a red

00:49:03.060 flag for danger,

00:49:04.520 that there are so

00:49:05.060 many reports?

00:49:05.660 would you say

00:49:06.780 it's near proof

00:49:08.000 of danger?

00:49:09.320 You've seen so

00:49:10.000 many of them that

00:49:10.680 in your mind it's

00:49:11.480 nearly proof, not

00:49:13.440 just a red flag.

00:49:14.720 Or do you think

00:49:15.600 it's more evidence

00:49:16.260 of a probable

00:49:17.160 mass hysteria?

00:49:18.920 Or do you think

00:49:19.900 that it's literally

00:49:20.740 nothing?

00:49:22.520 The fact that

00:49:23.700 there are lots of

00:49:24.320 anecdotal reports,

00:49:26.280 one of the answers

00:49:27.340 could be that it

00:49:28.060 literally means

00:49:28.520 nothing, because

00:49:29.560 anecdotal is just

00:49:30.920 anecdotal.

00:49:31.960 Which of those

00:49:32.840 would you say?

00:49:33.380 It's a red flag

00:49:35.100 for danger, it's

00:49:35.920 near proof of

00:49:36.540 danger, probable

00:49:37.340 mass hysteria, or

00:49:38.900 literally nothing.

00:49:40.600 Go.

00:49:42.380 Danger, noise,

00:49:43.820 red flag, nothing,

00:49:45.860 nothing, nothing.

00:49:49.460 Only one person

00:49:50.620 said, only a few

00:49:51.840 of you are saying

00:49:52.420 hysteria, okay?

00:49:55.700 So most of you

00:49:56.780 are saying either

00:49:57.420 nothing or a red

00:49:58.360 flag.

00:50:00.080 You know, I

00:50:01.000 realize my question

00:50:02.160 sucks, because some

00:50:03.360 think there would

00:50:03.720 be nothing and a

00:50:04.440 red flag at the

00:50:05.160 same time, can't

00:50:05.900 it?

00:50:07.140 Right?

00:50:08.120 It can be nothing

00:50:09.120 and also a red

00:50:10.620 flag.

00:50:11.840 So I'm going to

00:50:12.760 add together the

00:50:13.540 red flag for

00:50:14.200 danger and the

00:50:15.180 literally nothings.

00:50:16.760 And that would

00:50:17.160 be 78% of the

00:50:19.360 people who answered

00:50:19.940 it.

00:50:21.620 And I think that

00:50:22.480 would be, it's

00:50:23.340 correct to put the

00:50:24.160 red flag and the

00:50:25.640 literally nothing

00:50:26.200 together.

00:50:27.440 Because you've

00:50:28.040 literally proven

00:50:28.840 nothing, but it

00:50:30.520 could still be a

00:50:31.100 red flag of

00:50:31.660 something to look

00:50:32.240 for, right?

00:50:34.240 Only 10% said

00:50:35.720 probable mass

00:50:36.540 hysteria, and

00:50:37.360 that is my

00:50:38.120 vote.

00:50:39.540 My vote is

00:50:40.460 probable mass

00:50:41.440 hysteria.

00:50:44.020 Do you know

00:50:44.880 why a mass

00:50:45.640 hysteria works?

00:50:48.120 Because only 10%

00:50:49.740 of the people

00:50:50.320 recognize it.

00:50:54.160 This is exactly

00:50:55.660 what it looks

00:50:56.120 like.

00:50:56.380 here should have

00:50:59.660 been the tip

00:51:00.160 off that mass

00:51:01.620 hysteria is the

00:51:02.500 probable

00:51:03.020 explanation.

00:51:04.680 There are too

00:51:05.260 many medical

00:51:05.920 problems being

00:51:06.800 attributed to the

00:51:08.020 vaccinations.

00:51:09.620 If you told me

00:51:10.720 there are three

00:51:11.380 medical problems

00:51:12.280 that we're seeing

00:51:13.020 all over the

00:51:13.680 place, it's the

00:51:14.840 same three, then

00:51:16.400 I'd say, whoa,

00:51:17.280 that's a red flag.

00:51:18.320 Not proof.

00:51:19.380 Not near proof.

00:51:20.160 Just a red flag.

00:51:22.520 Look into it.

00:51:24.300 But if you tell me

00:51:25.740 that there are

00:51:26.260 dozens and dozens

00:51:27.220 of different medical

00:51:28.160 problems after the

00:51:29.180 shots, immediately

00:51:30.620 my mind says,

00:51:32.000 that's more,

00:51:33.980 that's closer to the

00:51:35.020 arc of a mass

00:51:35.840 hysteria.

00:51:36.420 But it could be

00:51:39.120 complicated.

00:51:40.400 Because it could be

00:51:41.420 a red flag plus

00:51:43.520 a mass hysteria.

00:51:45.120 It could be both.

00:51:46.960 Because within the

00:51:48.160 dozens and dozens

00:51:49.080 of medical problems

00:51:50.440 people are reporting,

00:51:51.780 there are some that

00:51:52.860 are dominant, right?

00:51:54.180 The myocarditis,

00:51:55.780 although the

00:51:56.840 myocarditis usually

00:51:57.900 clears up.

00:51:59.380 But let's say

00:52:00.060 fertility.

00:52:01.780 You know, some

00:52:02.340 impact on that.

00:52:03.780 There probably is a

00:52:04.860 top three that you

00:52:05.760 really should worry

00:52:06.400 about in terms of

00:52:07.980 a red flag.

00:52:08.860 Not in terms of

00:52:09.700 proof.

00:52:10.620 We don't have that.

00:52:12.020 But to me, this looks

00:52:12.960 like at least

00:52:13.840 half mass hysteria.

00:52:18.560 So whether or not

00:52:19.400 the vaccinations,

00:52:20.520 so let me summarize

00:52:21.220 this as cleanly as

00:52:22.340 possible, because

00:52:23.380 it's easy to get

00:52:24.280 mischaracterized when

00:52:25.420 you do this kind of

00:52:26.520 topic.

00:52:27.880 My opinion is

00:52:28.880 it's probably a

00:52:30.420 mix, all these

00:52:32.040 anecdotal reports

00:52:33.100 are probably a mix

00:52:34.740 of real red flags

00:52:36.380 flags, meaning you

00:52:38.140 really ought to take

00:52:38.780 it seriously, but

00:52:41.340 most of it is mass

00:52:42.620 hysteria and easily

00:52:44.660 identifiable as

00:52:45.680 so.

00:52:46.860 Easily identifiable.

00:52:48.600 In my opinion, the

00:52:49.800 mass hysteria part is

00:52:50.640 obvious, right?

00:52:52.460 Which does not mean

00:52:53.420 you're wrong.

00:52:55.000 Can you handle that

00:52:56.000 nuance?

00:52:56.940 If I tell you that

00:52:57.980 most of what you're

00:52:58.820 seeing in the

00:52:59.360 anecdotal reports are

00:53:00.580 just mass hysteria,

00:53:01.640 can you accept that

00:53:03.080 that could be true?

00:53:04.120 At the same time,

00:53:05.560 at the same time,

00:53:06.740 there might be

00:53:08.040 enough of these

00:53:08.600 reports that are

00:53:09.320 true that you

00:53:11.220 need to take it

00:53:11.800 seriously.

00:53:13.840 But I figure

00:53:15.620 probably there are

00:53:16.300 only a few

00:53:16.900 conditions that

00:53:18.260 look credible,

00:53:19.320 and probably there

00:53:20.460 are a whole bunch

00:53:20.880 of other things

00:53:21.560 that are just

00:53:22.040 coincidence.

00:53:23.220 And that's the

00:53:23.820 coincidence part is

00:53:24.960 the mass hysteria

00:53:25.760 part.

00:53:27.340 How do you

00:53:28.000 identify mass

00:53:28.740 hysteria?

00:53:29.540 The clue is how

00:53:31.500 many different

00:53:32.340 explanations or

00:53:33.720 problems there

00:53:35.020 are.

00:53:39.040 Yeah, I'm

00:53:40.040 intentionally keeping

00:53:40.880 the camera in a

00:53:44.400 terrible mode,

00:53:45.180 because I've got

00:53:45.620 this injury on my

00:53:46.820 lip that looks like

00:53:48.200 monkeypox, but

00:53:49.040 isn't.

00:53:50.060 No, it's not a

00:53:50.760 herpes sore.

00:53:51.500 I know you're

00:53:51.920 going to say that.

00:53:53.320 I literally burned

00:53:54.900 myself very badly

00:53:55.780 on my lip.

00:53:58.740 Is Robert

00:54:00.240 Malone correct?

00:54:02.160 I doubt it.

00:54:04.340 If I had to

00:54:05.140 place a bet on

00:54:06.500 Dr. Malone being

00:54:08.380 correct on, let's

00:54:09.380 say, most of his

00:54:10.940 biggest claims, I'd

00:54:12.480 bet against him, and

00:54:13.400 I'd feel pretty

00:54:14.000 confident about that.

00:54:15.400 If you said bet

00:54:16.540 against everything

00:54:17.700 that Malone says

00:54:19.460 that's different from

00:54:20.280 what the mainstream

00:54:20.820 says, I wouldn't

00:54:21.400 take that bet.

00:54:23.140 I would agree with

00:54:25.080 you.

00:54:25.820 It's almost

00:54:26.480 certainly true that

00:54:28.020 some of the

00:54:28.500 things Malone is

00:54:29.280 saying are

00:54:30.480 valid, but I

00:54:32.640 think he goes

00:54:33.180 too far.

00:54:36.980 Call him rogue

00:54:38.040 to discredit

00:54:38.740 him.

00:54:39.220 Yeah, I do

00:54:39.660 call the rogue

00:54:40.700 doctors rogue to

00:54:41.980 discredit them, but

00:54:43.800 what I'm doing is

00:54:44.480 discrediting the

00:54:46.560 category for your

00:54:49.280 benefit.

00:54:50.220 So if I take a

00:54:51.440 specific doctor and

00:54:53.000 say that they're

00:54:54.960 presenting themselves

00:54:55.760 as a rogue doctor, I

00:54:57.620 do mean, I do

00:54:58.860 mean intentionally

00:54:59.660 for you to reduce

00:55:01.280 your belief in

00:55:02.020 them.

00:55:02.720 That's the point.

00:55:04.420 Doesn't mean they're

00:55:05.160 wrong.

00:55:06.240 If you take that as

00:55:07.460 I believe that my

00:55:08.760 medical information is

00:55:10.320 better than theirs and

00:55:11.080 you should treat them

00:55:11.760 as wrong, that's not

00:55:12.700 what I'm saying.

00:55:13.760 I'm saying that if

00:55:14.580 you're not a doctor and

00:55:16.040 you can't check it

00:55:16.740 yourself, and the

00:55:18.040 only thing you know is

00:55:19.100 that there's a rogue

00:55:19.960 doctor who differs from

00:55:21.800 the mainstream, you're

00:55:23.600 probably bet on the

00:55:24.260 mainstream.

00:55:25.560 The smart money says

00:55:26.480 the mainstream is

00:55:27.140 right, not the rogue

00:55:27.920 doctor.

00:55:28.800 You only think the

00:55:30.160 rogue doctors are

00:55:31.360 credible because you

00:55:32.960 only hear about the

00:55:33.960 ones that got it

00:55:34.660 right.

00:55:37.880 Follow the money,

00:55:38.740 Scott.

00:55:39.160 Doctors have little

00:55:39.880 or nothing to gain.

00:55:40.880 Really?

00:55:42.760 Really?

00:55:44.160 You don't think Dr.

00:55:45.360 Malone got some

00:55:46.020 speaking invitations?

00:55:49.960 You don't think he

00:55:51.060 monetized that?

00:55:51.800 You know, the other

00:55:54.720 thing you have to look

00:55:55.460 at is that Malone

00:55:57.720 presents himself as a

00:55:59.020 narcissist, and I'm

00:56:01.840 not going to say

00:56:02.300 that's bad because I

00:56:03.800 am one, and there are

00:56:05.060 two types.

00:56:06.280 One type of narcissist

00:56:07.400 wants to just destroy

00:56:09.040 everything, you know,

00:56:10.020 destroy their social

00:56:11.960 situation.

00:56:13.200 The other kind just

00:56:13.980 likes to get credit

00:56:14.920 for doing good stuff.

00:56:17.520 In my opinion, Malone

00:56:20.380 looks like a narcissist.

00:56:22.400 Meaning that his

00:56:23.360 payoff is having

00:56:24.780 people believe he was

00:56:25.900 right all along, and

00:56:27.420 that that would be

00:56:28.020 worth any economic

00:56:29.320 degradation that he

00:56:32.440 experienced.

00:56:33.920 So if he's

00:56:34.880 financially secure,

00:56:36.920 then his payoff would

00:56:38.100 be what they call the

00:56:39.280 fuel.

00:56:40.220 People say, you're

00:56:41.160 right, Malone, you

00:56:42.840 were right all along.

00:56:44.300 Now, if it turns out

00:56:45.500 later that he's right,

00:56:46.640 he'll make a fortune.

00:56:48.260 Do you get that?

00:56:49.220 If you say, well, he

00:56:51.860 sacrificed so much to

00:56:54.180 be a rogue, I say, no,

00:56:56.440 he invested so much to

00:56:58.120 be a rogue.

00:56:59.100 If his investment pays

00:57:01.320 off, and it turns out

00:57:02.440 he's right, he's going to

00:57:04.760 have like a speaking

00:57:05.580 career, books.

00:57:07.900 He will make, I would

00:57:09.640 say the value of Dr.

00:57:10.860 Malone being right in the

00:57:12.440 end, if it turns out that

00:57:13.500 way, would probably be

00:57:15.320 $20 million.

00:57:17.400 If I had to monetize

00:57:18.680 the value of him being

00:57:20.600 right in the end, it

00:57:21.760 would be about $20

00:57:22.500 million.

00:57:23.320 Because he'd sell a

00:57:24.180 book, and they'd go in

00:57:25.360 the speaking circuit, and

00:57:27.340 he probably, I don't

00:57:28.360 know if he practices, but

00:57:29.560 if he practices medicine,

00:57:31.300 all the smart people would

00:57:32.340 say, I'm going to go to

00:57:33.140 you, because you've got

00:57:34.120 everything right.

00:57:36.560 Does that make him

00:57:37.400 wrong?

00:57:38.200 No, I don't know if he's

00:57:38.960 right or wrong.

00:57:40.420 How would I know?

00:57:41.180 So I can't give you an

00:57:42.680 opinion of whether he's

00:57:43.340 right or wrong.

00:57:44.140 I can tell you what it

00:57:45.000 looks like.

00:57:46.600 He's in a category that's

00:57:48.220 usually wrong.

00:57:49.540 It doesn't mean he's

00:57:50.560 wrong, but he's in a

00:57:51.280 category that's usually

00:57:52.160 wrong.

00:57:53.140 And he acts like he

00:57:55.620 presents himself as a

00:57:56.940 narcissist.

00:57:58.920 Again, that's subjective,

00:58:00.740 but I've seen enough of

00:58:02.100 him, and it takes one to

00:58:03.260 know one, right?

00:58:04.740 Like, nobody's more

00:58:05.620 narcissistic than I am.

00:58:08.360 But I'm also

00:58:09.140 transparent.

00:58:10.740 I'm transparent in the

00:58:11.940 sense that if I don't

00:58:13.460 do something that's

00:58:14.240 worthwhile to you, I

00:58:16.680 don't want any credit.

00:58:18.300 But if I do, and I do

00:58:20.180 something that helps, yeah,

00:58:21.520 I'd like you to mention

00:58:22.180 it, because that would

00:58:23.040 feel good to me, and

00:58:23.840 maybe I'll do some more

00:58:24.620 stuff for you.

00:58:25.780 It just works.

00:58:26.660 It's just a virtuous

00:58:27.340 cycle.

00:58:28.340 I give you something, you

00:58:29.480 give me something that I

00:58:30.480 want.

00:58:31.340 I want different stuff than

00:58:32.620 you want.

00:58:33.120 That's a perfect situation.

00:58:34.400 If we wanted the same

00:58:35.320 stuff, it might be a

00:58:36.280 problem.

00:58:37.300 But if I want credit,

00:58:39.080 and you want some

00:58:40.820 benefit that I can help

00:58:41.800 you get, well, we both

00:58:42.960 win.

00:58:44.160 That's cool.

00:58:45.200 So I don't care that he

00:58:46.800 might, in my opinion, have

00:58:49.220 that personality trait that I

00:58:50.520 have.

00:58:51.300 That part's fine.

00:58:52.040 How is that not mind reading?

00:58:57.280 That is statistical assumptions

00:59:01.540 short of mind reading.

00:59:03.600 Mind reading would say, I know

00:59:05.620 what he's thinking.

00:59:07.220 I don't say that.

00:59:08.880 I say, to me, he looks like

00:59:11.300 me.

00:59:12.980 So if I were to say, well, if

00:59:14.820 he looks like me, he's probably

00:59:15.900 like me, that's my speculation.

00:59:17.440 So I always put anything that

00:59:20.160 is somebody else's thoughts into

00:59:23.180 the speculative road.

00:59:25.880 Using rogue is persuasion.

00:59:28.040 Yes, I am intentionally persuading

00:59:30.060 you to think that he's less

00:59:31.340 credible than he presents

00:59:33.040 himself.

00:59:34.540 I'm not trying not to do that.

00:59:37.600 I'm doing that very intentionally,

00:59:39.000 very openly.

00:59:40.420 I'm trying to encourage you to

00:59:43.100 put less credibility on anybody

00:59:45.220 who differs from the mainstream

00:59:47.520 in a way you want to hear.

00:59:49.840 Maybe that's the thing I should

00:59:51.060 have said.

00:59:52.080 All right, here's the better way

00:59:53.300 to say it.

00:59:53.600 I finally figured out how to

00:59:54.680 say this.

00:59:56.740 This took me forever.

00:59:58.380 I finally figured out how to

00:59:59.680 communicate this.

01:00:01.440 Don't believe people who are a

01:00:04.480 little too close to what you

01:00:05.740 want to be true.

01:00:08.300 Those are the least credible

01:00:09.900 people.

01:00:10.360 If they disagree with the

01:00:11.820 mainstream, if you disagree with

01:00:14.320 the mainstream, and it's exactly

01:00:16.500 what you want it to hear, it's

01:00:17.680 right on the nose, the odds of

01:00:19.820 that being true are low.

01:00:22.620 Are low.

01:00:26.700 It doesn't mean he's not right,

01:00:28.500 but the odds are low.

01:00:31.000 Here Scott describes himself

01:00:32.600 being a real, yeah, that's

01:00:34.740 exactly true.

01:00:35.840 So somebody says that I'm

01:00:37.800 describing myself.

01:00:38.840 Let's see if that's true.

01:00:41.020 I disagree with the

01:00:42.220 mainstream, and I tell you

01:00:44.480 things often that are exactly

01:00:45.980 what you want to hear.

01:00:47.440 Yeah, that's true.

01:00:49.180 That's true.

01:00:50.420 So what I do in public is I

01:00:54.560 make predictions and statements,

01:00:57.200 and then you get to test them.

01:00:59.180 So you'll get to see if it's

01:01:00.540 true.

01:01:01.160 Like anything that I tell you,

01:01:03.280 usually you just get to see for

01:01:04.700 yourself, right?

01:01:06.000 So if I told you that Biden would

01:01:08.320 be problematic as a president,

01:01:10.900 well, you get to see it

01:01:11.780 yourself.

01:01:12.660 Was I right or was I wrong?

01:01:14.440 And I keep score.

01:01:17.200 You know, I literally gave

01:01:18.800 myself a scorecard after the

01:01:20.720 pandemic.

01:01:21.760 Here's what I said.

01:01:23.040 Here's how it turned out.

01:01:24.180 And I included the things I got

01:01:25.720 wrong.

01:01:26.940 Now, if Malone does that, let's

01:01:29.260 say five years from now, we've

01:01:31.280 got a better idea, everything

01:01:33.640 else.

01:01:34.220 If Malone does that and says,

01:01:35.820 here's the stuff I said.

01:01:36.740 I got a couple of things wrong,

01:01:38.840 but here are the things I got

01:01:39.740 right.

01:01:41.060 Instantly, he would go right to

01:01:42.880 the top of my credibility list.

01:01:45.460 Right?

01:01:48.260 He would go right to the top of my

01:01:50.120 credibility list if he kept track

01:01:51.940 of his own statements and how he

01:01:53.680 got them right or wrong.

01:01:55.440 And then, you know, gave you an

01:01:56.760 honest accounting at the end.

01:01:58.440 Then I would lift him up a little

01:02:02.060 bit.

01:02:05.060 Malone is clearly right on myocarditis

01:02:07.420 as the CDC data is showing the

01:02:09.680 trend now.

01:02:11.500 He might be right in that.

01:02:12.880 But the myocarditis, as I understand

01:02:14.840 it, clears up.

01:02:18.740 And that...

01:02:22.060 Yeah.

01:02:25.220 So the myocarditis is not so much a

01:02:27.480 question of whether you get it,

01:02:28.780 because I think we've done that for a

01:02:29.960 long time.

01:02:30.980 It's a question of whether how bad

01:02:33.660 that is in the long run makes a

01:02:36.320 difference to you compared to any

01:02:38.500 protection you'd get from the shot.

01:02:42.460 Cardiac cells can't repair.

01:02:44.240 I don't think it's a cardiac cell

01:02:46.060 problem.

01:02:51.400 But COVID also causes myocarditis,

01:02:54.000 somebody says, right?

01:02:54.720 I'm afraid of long, but myocarditis, no

01:03:03.800 biggie.

01:03:08.040 Isn't myocarditis part of long COVID?

01:03:11.740 I'd put that in the same category, right?

01:03:14.940 If you get some kind of condition,

01:03:17.600 there are cardiac stem cells.

01:03:21.900 So I think the doctor is telling us that

01:03:24.080 the heart can repair itself.

01:03:29.140 What is the definition of long COVID?

01:03:30.960 Yeah, that's a good question.

01:03:32.920 In my opinion, it's anything that

01:03:34.820 continues to bother you after you had

01:03:37.320 COVID that's related to the COVID.

01:03:39.880 So I would think that if you had myocarditis

01:03:41.800 and it lasted, I don't even know if that

01:03:43.940 could happen.

01:03:44.340 Can myocarditis just continue?

01:03:48.920 I don't know.

01:03:51.800 But anything that bothers you after,

01:03:53.660 I would call long COVID,

01:03:55.300 whether it's temporary or permanent.

01:04:00.380 All right.

01:04:02.880 Do folks in upstate New York hunt deer?

01:04:05.600 Yes, they do.

01:04:09.060 Yes, they do.

01:04:10.500 Yeah, my parents were hunters.

01:04:12.480 They both were deer hunters.

01:04:14.340 You know, I do have a different opinion

01:04:20.320 of people who eat the meat.

01:04:22.520 And, you know, in upstate New York,

01:04:25.400 you could make an argument for conservation.

01:04:30.160 I mean, it's kind of a crazy argument.

01:04:32.060 You have to shoot the deer to protect the deer.

01:04:34.200 But there really would be too many deer.

01:04:36.940 That's, there's no joke.

01:04:38.340 If the deer were not somehow population controlled,

01:04:43.340 and I'm not saying that's the best way to do it,

01:04:45.600 but there would be,

01:04:49.380 yeah, either you'd have to introduce wolves

01:04:51.300 and then you're still killing deer.

01:04:53.780 Yeah, there's no right answer.

01:04:55.560 There's no right answer.

01:04:56.840 But at least if you're eating the venison,

01:04:59.180 and we did.

01:04:59.900 I ate a lot of venison.

01:05:00.800 But if you eat the venison,

01:05:03.020 it's at least not as ethically disgusting.

01:05:14.940 Yeah.

01:05:17.900 Reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone fixed it.

01:05:20.560 Deer will destroy a place.

01:05:21.980 Yeah.

01:05:22.380 The deer will eat your crops.

01:05:23.800 All right.

01:05:28.900 I think that's all for now.

01:05:30.780 I believe we've done our job.

01:05:32.900 And I believe that I will talk to you tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 31, 2022

Episode 1821 Scott Adams： Fox Shuns Trump, Depopulation Rumors And More Fun

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript