Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 01, 2022


Episode 1822 Scott Adams： Most Of The News Today Is Fake And Kind Of Funny


Episode Stats

Length

58 minutes

Words per Minute

144.02664

Word Count

8,392

Sentence Count

407

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

20


Summary

Joe Biden is quarantined in his basement, and the media is trying to figure out how to make him disappear. Plus, a new political party formed by a man who thinks he can take votes away from the other party and make them vote for him.


Transcript

00:00:00.220 Well, once again, let me inform you, I do not have monkeypox, but if you want to know
00:00:06.460 what a bad luck looks like, bad luck looks like injuring your lip during a monkeypox.
00:00:15.100 I know, it looks like I put my lip in the wrong place, doesn't it?
00:00:18.820 But no, no, just a burn.
00:00:21.980 All right, you seem like you're in Texas, somebody says.
00:00:25.760 Good morning, everybody. How would you like to enjoy today's show more than any show you've ever enjoyed?
00:00:35.920 I know, pretty good stuff coming.
00:00:38.960 And all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a canteen jug or a glass.
00:00:43.000 Hold on, canteen jug or flask.
00:00:49.420 I'm going to get this right. I'm trying to remember my own stuff.
00:00:52.520 And all you need, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a canteen jug or a flask.
00:01:00.340 You can't take your chalice or stein, a vessel of any kind.
00:01:04.840 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:01:07.340 I like coffee.
00:01:09.440 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,
00:01:12.220 the dopamine to end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:01:16.120 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now.
00:01:19.840 Go.
00:01:22.520 I apologize for my dainty cup.
00:01:27.440 This is no way to drink coffee.
00:01:29.900 No, coffee does not go in a dainty cup unless you're visiting the Queen.
00:01:34.320 And even then, you should be drinking tea.
00:01:36.400 So there's no right time for a little teacup.
00:01:40.200 Well, I have a question about the Democrat strategy.
00:01:44.020 I feel as if the strategy is not to remove Biden from office for incompetence,
00:01:52.080 but rather to make him slowly disappear.
00:01:55.740 I feel like that's the strategy.
00:01:59.400 For example, first he got COVID, and then he had to quarantine.
00:02:05.060 So that was good.
00:02:06.260 But then he got out, and then they said, well, we're going to have to give him COVID again.
00:02:11.440 So he gets COVID back to back.
00:02:13.320 But what I'm expecting is somewhere around the end of this next quarantine period,
00:02:19.340 I think we're going to hear that he has something called serial COVID.
00:02:24.420 Serial COVID.
00:02:25.740 It just keeps coming back.
00:02:27.180 And he's probably got a comorbidity of TDS.
00:02:31.580 So if you add the comorbidity of TDS to the serial repeating COVID,
00:02:38.420 well, Joe Biden is just going to have to hide in his basement forever.
00:02:42.260 Now, I'm not sure about this next part, but does it seem to you he's getting thinner?
00:02:48.460 Has anybody noticed he seems to be getting thinner?
00:02:50.660 He was always quite fit.
00:02:52.680 He seems to be getting thinner.
00:02:53.540 I think they're feeding him less.
00:02:54.880 Yeah, I think they're slowly trying to make him disappear.
00:02:59.380 Like they'll feed him a little less, and he'll just get a little smaller.
00:03:02.560 And one day you'll see a video of him in his basement.
00:03:05.960 He'll be like 85 pounds.
00:03:08.380 And, you know, it's not until you get down to like 65 pounds that you can, you know,
00:03:12.140 say he's actually gone.
00:03:13.520 But I think the cat is on the roof.
00:03:15.940 They're slowly trying to disappear him.
00:03:18.740 You know, first his public persona, and then they'll shrink him with lack of food
00:03:22.940 until he's a little ball about this big, and they'll have, you know, just keep him alive
00:03:27.680 with tubes and stuff.
00:03:28.920 I feel like that's the strategy.
00:03:31.040 I don't know.
00:03:31.440 I'm just guessing.
00:03:33.820 Well, what do you think would happen in a hypothetical matchup for president between Biden and Trump
00:03:39.060 if it were to happen today?
00:03:41.060 What do you think a Rasmussen poll showed?
00:03:43.280 Let's see if you're smart.
00:03:45.620 Who do you think would win as of today?
00:03:50.260 Well, according to Rasmussen, if the election were held today, 40% of likely voters would
00:03:55.440 vote for Biden, and 46% would vote for Trump.
00:03:59.680 But another 10% would choose some other candidate if it were just those two and somebody else.
00:04:06.900 10% for another candidate.
00:04:08.580 So what do you think of Yang's new political party?
00:04:15.860 Who is he going to take votes away from?
00:04:21.120 Yeah, I think I heard somebody say he would take votes away from Republicans, but it was
00:04:27.100 the Republicans who were going to vote for a Democrat anyway.
00:04:30.580 I don't know.
00:04:31.260 Maybe.
00:04:34.160 Yang will yank votes.
00:04:35.500 Yeah, I don't...
00:04:39.520 It's hard to see how it's helpful, but maybe.
00:04:43.140 You know, if Yang can control 10% of the vote, he's a kingmaker, right?
00:04:49.400 So it's not a bad strategy.
00:04:51.540 If, you know, you've got all these sort of in-between confused people.
00:04:55.980 What if?
00:04:56.760 Let's just do a what if.
00:04:58.040 What if Yang's real play is to only try to control the sensible people?
00:05:06.120 Because there aren't that many of them.
00:05:07.700 I'd say about 10%, maybe.
00:05:09.920 If 10% of the country identify with a political party, but they're willing to listen to a better
00:05:16.820 argument, it's about 10%.
00:05:20.420 He could control the whole country like Joe Manchin.
00:05:24.740 So everybody who says this Yang thing is just, you know, a sideshow and no importance, it's
00:05:29.720 not a sideshow.
00:05:30.800 It's an insurrection.
00:05:34.040 Legally.
00:05:34.960 But it's an insurrection in concept.
00:05:37.120 In the sense that if he succeeds, he will be effectively the president, just by having
00:05:43.200 a third party that actually makes sense.
00:05:46.080 And here's something that I think Andrew Yang could do that so far nobody else was able to do.
00:05:53.820 Be reasonable.
00:05:56.180 Nobody tried that yet, right?
00:05:58.920 Nobody really tried being reasonable yet.
00:06:02.100 There have been third party attempts, but they always seem, you know, sort of,
00:06:06.120 ideologically driven.
00:06:09.020 So what would happen if you had a third party where the only thing they're trying to do is
00:06:13.680 figure out what makes sense?
00:06:16.120 You know, follow the science.
00:06:17.900 What if you had, how about this?
00:06:19.820 What if you had to follow the science party?
00:06:22.940 You know, I guess the Democrats think they are that, but evidence suggests maybe not so much.
00:06:29.320 I don't know.
00:06:30.680 So I think if you ignore this Yang situation, you do it at your peril.
00:06:34.900 Because if he gets just 10% of people on board, and it's the reasonable people who could switch
00:06:40.220 sides in a situation, that's real power.
00:06:45.120 That's real power.
00:06:46.260 Define science.
00:06:47.440 Yeah.
00:06:48.200 Good question.
00:06:51.000 Well, how would you like a story about how I'm so right?
00:06:55.880 That's your favorite story, isn't it?
00:06:57.220 No, your favorite story is when I'm wrong, and I admit it.
00:07:01.960 I know.
00:07:02.600 I know.
00:07:03.240 I know how you are.
00:07:04.800 You'd rather me be wrong.
00:07:06.440 But I'm sorry.
00:07:07.820 I'm as right as right can be.
00:07:09.260 Because it turns out that there's a new Harvard University study, and they tried to look into
00:07:14.640 the motivations of the Capitol rioters.
00:07:18.660 Now, they used an interesting term here, rioters.
00:07:23.120 So I don't know if that excludes people that they thought were just protesting.
00:07:27.880 So I have a little question about how they defined that.
00:07:31.720 But they found out that only 8% of the people who they called rioters believed they were there
00:07:37.520 for an insurrection.
00:07:38.460 And 92% of them believed they were there to save the democracy.
00:07:44.280 Save the republic.
00:07:45.260 Now, is there anybody you know who said, hey, I think that J-6 committee is making us think
00:07:54.100 past the sale?
00:07:55.820 The sale is what did the people who were at the event believe?
00:07:59.540 Because they started with they want an insurrection, and then let's look at all the facts.
00:08:04.140 No, you don't start with they want an insurrection.
00:08:07.380 You have to demonstrate that.
00:08:09.480 And when anybody did, well, I guess this is probably the first one.
00:08:13.300 I don't think there's been another.
00:08:15.260 Correct me if I'm wrong.
00:08:17.380 But I don't think there's been another study, and certainly not from Harvard University,
00:08:21.920 which at least the left would be inclined to believe, that says that basically 92% of
00:08:27.560 their people believed Trump, that there was some sketchiness to the election, and that
00:08:34.040 they were there to fix the sketchiness.
00:08:36.400 They were not there to overthrow the government.
00:08:39.000 They were there to fix it.
00:08:40.020 Now, what does the January 6th committee and all of the mainstream news do with the fact
00:08:46.220 that the very foundation, the most important part of their narrative, has collapsed, and
00:08:53.400 it was destroyed by their own side?
00:08:55.220 If you call anything coming out of Harvard left-leaning, and I think you could make that assumption.
00:09:02.020 Now, even the person involved in the study said he was quite surprised.
00:09:09.800 He was surprised.
00:09:11.100 And the results were that, quote, many believed they were defending democracy from, quote, imminent
00:09:19.480 existential danger, unquote, unquote.
00:09:22.700 How does the news handle this?
00:09:32.760 The only way the mainstream news can handle this new information is by completely disappearing
00:09:38.360 it.
00:09:39.520 It will be disappeared right in front of you.
00:09:43.080 Do you think there's any way that if Harvard University did a study, and it came out showing
00:09:48.640 that 92% of the attendees wanted a literal insurrection to install a dictator?
00:09:55.920 Suppose it had gone that way.
00:09:58.320 Do you think the news would cover it?
00:10:01.620 I think so.
00:10:03.660 Yeah.
00:10:04.460 I think they might.
00:10:05.780 I think they might cover it if the people said they were there for an insurrection.
00:10:09.400 But what if the people say that they were not there for an insurrection, they were there
00:10:13.560 to fix the republic, exactly what it looked like?
00:10:16.720 To me, I mean, that's exactly what it looked like to me.
00:10:20.700 Is there anybody who even doubted that, who's watching this?
00:10:24.240 Is there anybody here who didn't have the same impression that they were there for good
00:10:30.920 intentions, even if they had bad information?
00:10:33.860 We don't know if they had bad information, but if they did.
00:10:39.740 So this is fascinating.
00:10:42.160 The degree to which the fake news no longer needs to pretend is sort of stunning, isn't
00:10:48.220 it?
00:10:49.740 Are you surprised that the fake news doesn't need to pretend anymore?
00:10:53.800 They're really not trying to hide this.
00:10:57.280 This is not hidden at all.
00:10:59.000 Well, it's hidden in the sense that you'd have to go to Breitbart in this case.
00:11:03.380 So I found out about the Harvard study by looking at Joel Pollack's article in Breitbart.
00:11:12.360 And Jonathan Turley's been on this point as well.
00:11:15.760 Now, let me ask you this.
00:11:17.960 Who in the country of, let's say, a political public figure?
00:11:23.740 What political public figure has been telling you, and I haven't heard one other person
00:11:30.340 say it, of political, you know, let's say public figures.
00:11:35.120 What other public figure told you that they were thinking past the sale and that the most
00:11:40.020 important question is this?
00:11:42.180 What were they thinking when they did it?
00:11:44.160 It was only me.
00:11:46.700 Right?
00:11:47.760 I'm not wrong, am I?
00:11:48.840 But I believe it was only me.
00:11:52.440 In the whole fucking world, I think it was only me.
00:11:55.680 That's why you watch me.
00:11:58.960 All right.
00:11:59.920 And then I've got a second question about the 8% who did think they were there for an insurrection.
00:12:05.860 Do you think that if you really drilled down with the 8% that you would find out that they
00:12:09.880 really wanted an insurrection?
00:12:12.920 Maybe.
00:12:13.900 Yeah, I know some of you are saying the 8% are feds.
00:12:16.100 That's funny.
00:12:17.360 There might be some feds in that.
00:12:18.840 Who knows?
00:12:19.420 I doubt that's who got interviewed.
00:12:21.940 But, for the poll.
00:12:25.260 But what do you think they wanted?
00:12:26.720 Do you think that if you had asked them, they would have said, well, our end goal is to
00:12:31.160 destroy the country?
00:12:33.720 Some might.
00:12:34.660 You know, they might be anarchists.
00:12:36.320 Do you think they would have said their end goal is to install Trump as an actual dictator?
00:12:42.560 I doubt it.
00:12:43.460 I doubt it, because he wouldn't want the job.
00:12:46.740 I mean, I've seen no indication that he would want to be the dictator.
00:12:51.660 I mean, in the sense that it's impractical.
00:12:55.520 If it were practical, maybe that's another conversation.
00:12:58.420 But given that it's so obviously impractical, who did they think was going to be the dictator?
00:13:03.840 Or were they going to overthrow it for some other form of democracy?
00:13:08.480 See, if you drill down on the insurrectionists, I think you would find out that they're either
00:13:12.320 literally crazy, or what they wanted was a little bit closer to fixing the republic after all.
00:13:17.780 It's just they had a different view of what that looks like.
00:13:21.120 I feel like the insurrectionists were probably closer to the regular people than we think.
00:13:26.740 They just like to use more hyperbole, and maybe they're in militias, and they just talk that way.
00:13:31.800 And the other thing that I've been saying forever, that the Democrats don't seem to recognize,
00:13:39.140 is that there's a way that Republicans talk about overthrowing their government
00:13:44.320 that is, first of all, very healthy, because Republicans are always on the verge of,
00:13:51.640 don't push us, don't push us.
00:13:54.060 That's a healthy tension.
00:13:57.240 But it's never that serious, in my opinion.
00:14:00.000 They're not really that serious about overthrowing the government.
00:14:02.880 They're just making it clear that there's a line.
00:14:06.460 Don't cross that line.
00:14:09.540 All right, here's my next fake news story from Newsweek.
00:14:14.960 I'm not sure if this is, yeah, I'll call it fake news.
00:14:17.560 It's in the category of fake news.
00:14:19.140 So here's the title of the story.
00:14:20.600 Tell me what you think the story would be about if you saw this headline in Newsweek.
00:14:26.300 Fentanyl surge started and peaked under Trump, despite the GOP blaming Biden.
00:14:33.000 Wow, the fentanyl surge started and peaked.
00:14:38.180 It was the highest under Trump.
00:14:39.840 Wow.
00:14:41.040 So what do you think that story says?
00:14:43.360 Do you think the story says, if you're coming in late, it's a burn?
00:14:48.420 I burned myself on twice-heated soup and a piece of spinach that wouldn't leave my lip.
00:14:54.900 It was quite painful.
00:14:56.180 But no, it's not monkeypox or anything else.
00:15:01.420 Sorry for that diversion.
00:15:03.380 So the Newsweek story about fentanyl surge under Trump,
00:15:06.940 when you dig down into the story,
00:15:08.820 it says that Trump seized more fentanyl coming across the border than Biden did.
00:15:14.280 Just let that sink in.
00:15:19.660 Just let it...
00:15:20.760 Let that sink in.
00:15:23.060 This is Newsweek.
00:15:25.560 It's Newsweek.
00:15:26.980 They are a discredited organization, I give you that.
00:15:30.240 But not everybody knows it.
00:15:32.160 If you're 75 and you grew up reading Newsweek,
00:15:35.420 and you see a Newsweek headline,
00:15:37.400 do you think that Newsweek is a discredited news organization?
00:15:40.240 Maybe you don't know that.
00:15:43.780 I mean, those of us who are a little more sophisticated in our knowledge,
00:15:47.840 we know that.
00:15:48.960 But not everybody knows that.
00:15:51.140 So I think that when they see a fentanyl surge,
00:15:53.660 they're going to think it's a surge in overdose deaths, don't you?
00:15:57.520 But in fact, the overdose death rate is the highest under Biden.
00:16:01.940 So not only did Trump do a stronger job of seizing fentanyl at the border,
00:16:09.140 according to Newsweek,
00:16:10.860 but there were also more overdose deaths under Biden.
00:16:15.060 Both of the facts in the story are pro-Trump.
00:16:17.940 And they made them look like they were negative.
00:16:22.000 And this is right in front of you,
00:16:24.440 because the title simply just doesn't match the content.
00:16:28.100 And they'll do this over and over again.
00:16:30.160 Title doesn't match the content.
00:16:31.620 Title doesn't match the content.
00:16:34.420 All right, here's another fake news out of CNN.
00:16:37.820 So I love learning who the opinion hit piece people are.
00:16:44.140 So there's this guy, Dean Obadila,
00:16:47.100 I might be pronouncing it wrong, not intentionally,
00:16:50.340 who does opinion pieces for CNN.
00:16:52.480 And he's often a Trump attack dog.
00:16:56.860 You know, he'll just attack Trump for anything, and Republicans.
00:16:59.480 And CNN and all of the fake news had a little trouble yesterday,
00:17:05.180 because their fake news was that the GOP doesn't like veterans
00:17:10.020 and vetoed or didn't vote for a bill to protect them and their health
00:17:16.080 from the so-called burn pits danger.
00:17:18.640 And of course, because Jon Stewart was saying that the GOP voted against something
00:17:25.640 that they had recently voted for,
00:17:27.900 it looked like it was all political,
00:17:30.000 and they were painting the GOP as a bunch of political bastards
00:17:33.160 who didn't really care about veterans.
00:17:34.840 What do you think the real story was?
00:17:38.920 The real story, of course, was that the Democrats put a whole bunch of pork,
00:17:43.380 like 400 billion or some gigantic number, I don't know what it was,
00:17:47.140 some big number, of pork in the bill,
00:17:50.340 and the Republicans said,
00:17:51.540 I don't care how good the bill is, you can't do that.
00:17:53.980 Yeah, it was a poison pill.
00:17:54.940 So do you think that Dean Obadiah,
00:17:58.980 who is their, I would say he's among their lowest level attack dogs,
00:18:03.640 and by lowest level, I mean,
00:18:05.180 I feel like he gets the assignment that you can't win unless you just lie.
00:18:11.080 Like you can't make your case
00:18:12.660 unless you're willing to stretch or lie or omit,
00:18:16.420 you know, leave out context.
00:18:17.660 It's the only way you can get it done.
00:18:19.720 So apparently there are some people
00:18:21.360 who do opinion pieces for CNN
00:18:23.620 who are consistently willing to, let's say,
00:18:28.200 test the outer boundaries of fake news.
00:18:34.880 But Dean completely leaves out the context
00:18:37.960 that's the only context that matters,
00:18:40.480 which is the Republicans didn't like all the pork in the bill.
00:18:44.060 Do me a fact check.
00:18:45.520 I'm right about that, right?
00:18:47.300 Am I correct?
00:18:48.320 The only thing the Republicans didn't like
00:18:50.560 was the extra stuff that got added on,
00:18:53.620 as a nerdy trick, basically.
00:18:56.860 So if you don't mention that,
00:18:59.880 you have so little respect for your readers.
00:19:02.940 So little respect.
00:19:05.000 It was, and in fact,
00:19:08.000 Dean Obadiah characterized the GOP's action as,
00:19:12.660 quote,
00:19:12.980 the GOP is trying to score political points
00:19:16.360 by delaying this vital piece of legislation.
00:19:19.720 Is that what they're doing?
00:19:21.260 They're trying to score political points
00:19:23.760 by making themselves look bad
00:19:26.380 by stopping pork.
00:19:29.440 It looks like it's exactly the opposite of that.
00:19:32.560 What this looks like is that
00:19:34.360 politicians put their own benefit
00:19:37.380 lower than the country's.
00:19:41.300 Now, it's hard to imagine anybody would do that,
00:19:45.160 so I'm not sure that we could read their minds
00:19:47.340 and conclude that they were just operating out of principle,
00:19:51.000 but it looks like it.
00:19:53.280 It looks like it.
00:19:54.380 Again, I can't read their minds,
00:19:56.480 but if you're a Republican,
00:19:57.920 would you want to turn down something
00:20:00.060 that was a veteran health bill?
00:20:02.900 A Republican.
00:20:04.440 What Republican thinks it's good
00:20:06.080 to vote against a veteran health bill,
00:20:10.400 even if there's a reason that's technical
00:20:13.540 that has to do with the pork?
00:20:15.280 That never looks good.
00:20:16.780 That never looks good.
00:20:17.460 But a lot of Republicans did it, apparently,
00:20:20.580 or are going to do it or whatever.
00:20:24.020 Did it.
00:20:26.180 So are we mad at Republicans
00:20:30.120 for standing on principle
00:20:31.660 against their own self-interest?
00:20:34.340 Because that kind of looks like what happened.
00:20:37.400 I feel that they were not exactly
00:20:39.460 pursuing their own self-interest.
00:20:42.180 Because here's what would have looked good
00:20:44.480 for the politician.
00:20:45.800 I voted for that bill.
00:20:47.880 Because I like veterans.
00:20:49.860 By the time you got, you know,
00:20:51.540 campaigning for re-election,
00:20:53.220 you could just say that
00:20:54.440 and people would believe it.
00:20:55.780 I'm one of the few Republicans
00:20:57.080 who voted for helping veterans.
00:21:00.920 Nobody's going to look into that pork
00:21:02.520 part of the problem.
00:21:04.780 Yeah, go read the bill, somebody says.
00:21:09.060 So I floated the idea
00:21:10.600 that every bill should have
00:21:11.980 a list of ingredients.
00:21:16.340 So you can see what's in the bill,
00:21:17.800 good and bad.
00:21:19.260 Like the bad might be,
00:21:20.580 might raise taxes on some people.
00:21:23.360 The good might,
00:21:24.120 you'd need the, I don't know,
00:21:25.320 somebody to score that,
00:21:26.500 the OMB or something.
00:21:27.660 But the good would be,
00:21:28.740 here are the things we want to accomplish.
00:21:30.920 And then here's the price.
00:21:32.960 The price is,
00:21:34.000 this might cost more,
00:21:35.480 this might cause inflation,
00:21:37.000 this might raise the debt.
00:21:38.000 Just list the ingredients,
00:21:41.180 the good stuff and the bad stuff.
00:21:43.160 And then somebody else mentioned
00:21:44.960 that there should be a requirement
00:21:46.740 for a one-page executive summary.
00:21:49.920 I like it.
00:21:51.440 A requirement for a one-page executive summary.
00:21:54.520 Now you might need,
00:21:55.940 you know,
00:21:56.780 a paragraph or two
00:21:58.160 for each part of the bill
00:21:59.860 and there might be lots of them.
00:22:01.220 So, you know,
00:22:02.020 maybe really it's more like
00:22:03.360 a paragraph for each component
00:22:05.240 or something like that.
00:22:06.580 But it needs to be readable
00:22:08.140 by the public.
00:22:09.840 And I would say that
00:22:10.760 if the public,
00:22:12.040 if the average voter
00:22:13.280 can't understand the bill,
00:22:15.300 then it should not be voted on.
00:22:17.980 In fact,
00:22:18.700 I'd love to see each bill
00:22:20.740 be scored for,
00:22:22.100 let's say,
00:22:23.320 clarity.
00:22:25.040 Scored for clarity.
00:22:26.440 Give some independent group
00:22:27.520 to say,
00:22:28.520 all right,
00:22:28.960 we talked about this bill
00:22:31.460 with, let's say,
00:22:32.420 a group of volunteers
00:22:34.100 and they couldn't understand it.
00:22:37.160 So we score this,
00:22:38.300 you cannot vote on this.
00:22:40.020 I think the Congress
00:22:41.140 should be prevented
00:22:42.280 from voting on anything
00:22:44.160 the public doesn't understand.
00:22:46.540 You know,
00:22:46.980 by a majority anyway.
00:22:48.720 What do you think?
00:22:49.940 The Congress wouldn't be allowed
00:22:52.100 to vote for anything
00:22:53.180 the public doesn't understand.
00:22:58.040 Yeah,
00:22:58.580 if you're joining late,
00:23:00.300 I'll just tell everybody,
00:23:01.520 this is a burn
00:23:02.540 on my lip.
00:23:04.100 If you think it's more,
00:23:05.760 something more exciting,
00:23:07.020 I kind of wish it were.
00:23:09.220 But it's just a burn.
00:23:13.020 A score for readability
00:23:14.500 would be something
00:23:15.900 that AI could do.
00:23:17.140 There you go.
00:23:18.520 Artificial intelligence
00:23:19.600 could write a summary
00:23:20.500 of every bill.
00:23:22.520 How about that?
00:23:23.900 How about that?
00:23:25.360 Those are pretty good ideas.
00:23:26.360 All right.
00:23:30.140 Here's a provocative idea
00:23:32.560 that I don't think
00:23:33.600 that I'm quite in favor of,
00:23:36.160 but I want to share it with you.
00:23:38.160 And it comes from a doctor.
00:23:40.420 All right.
00:23:40.740 So this is not from me.
00:23:41.820 This is from a doctor.
00:23:44.360 On Twitter,
00:23:45.600 he goes by Doc Anarchy.
00:23:47.580 He's got a sub stack
00:23:48.680 you might be interested in as well.
00:23:50.360 It has lots of interesting
00:23:51.820 and provocative ideas
00:23:54.020 that are not quite
00:23:55.700 the normal point of view
00:23:58.000 that you see.
00:23:58.600 So it's worth seeing it
00:23:59.660 even if you disagree with him.
00:24:01.560 I love seeing an actual medical doctor
00:24:03.800 who's thinking through things critically.
00:24:05.840 So that alone,
00:24:08.040 that alone is worth doing.
00:24:10.860 All right.
00:24:11.280 So if you want somebody to follow
00:24:12.700 that you're not following,
00:24:13.660 follow
00:24:13.960 at
00:24:15.600 Dr. Anarchist
00:24:17.160 for interesting points of view.
00:24:20.400 Not ones you're all going to agree with.
00:24:22.620 All right.
00:24:22.780 So it's not about agreeing.
00:24:24.360 They're just interesting points of view.
00:24:29.040 All right.
00:24:30.300 Here it is.
00:24:31.120 His interesting points of view.
00:24:32.800 Nobody overdoses on prescription opioids.
00:24:35.160 I don't know if that's true completely.
00:24:37.880 This sounds like a little bit of an overclaim.
00:24:40.340 But he's a doctor.
00:24:43.100 So let's say it might be hyperbole,
00:24:45.540 but don't get too caught up
00:24:46.960 on whether that's 100% true.
00:24:49.340 Let's say it's 95% true.
00:24:52.420 It's probably closer to 95% true.
00:24:55.340 But we'll allow a little hyperbole.
00:24:57.740 Okay.
00:24:58.380 And then he goes on,
00:24:59.500 eliminate the black market for opioids
00:25:01.440 and you'll eliminate 99% of overdoses.
00:25:03.820 Now, remember,
00:25:05.500 he's a doctor.
00:25:07.280 He's a doctor.
00:25:08.680 So at least anecdotally,
00:25:10.660 and probably he's looked at studies too,
00:25:13.580 that it's hard to overdose
00:25:15.360 on a prescription med
00:25:16.940 because you would know
00:25:18.900 what the overdose amount would be.
00:25:23.220 Now, don't...
00:25:24.320 Before you question him,
00:25:26.640 you should do your research
00:25:27.800 because the addicts themselves
00:25:30.660 will tell you
00:25:31.280 that the real danger
00:25:32.140 is the fake stuff.
00:25:34.080 Now, again,
00:25:35.020 I'm operating purely anecdotally
00:25:36.940 right here, right?
00:25:38.260 But my own stepson
00:25:40.040 told me in direct language
00:25:42.960 that he wouldn't take counterfeit pills
00:25:44.760 because they probably have fentanyl in them
00:25:47.220 and you can't know what you're getting.
00:25:49.040 And then he died of an overdose.
00:25:51.680 So he probably did exactly
00:25:53.100 what he said he wouldn't do
00:25:54.000 the week before,
00:25:54.780 which is why I question
00:25:55.700 whether this would work.
00:25:56.620 But anyway, let's get to that.
00:26:00.140 So if you eliminated
00:26:01.100 the black market for opioids,
00:26:02.620 you wouldn't get the fake stuff.
00:26:05.040 If you could give legal,
00:26:07.720 well-known entities to the addicts,
00:26:11.320 would they take these legal,
00:26:13.240 well-known things
00:26:13.940 and not have overdose deaths?
00:26:17.980 Now, some of you are going to say,
00:26:21.380 yeah, we're talking about
00:26:23.980 unintentional overdoses.
00:26:25.460 We're not talking about suicide.
00:26:26.620 So, can you compare this
00:26:33.040 to the San Francisco outdoor drug thing
00:26:35.880 that looked like a huge failure?
00:26:37.600 And Michael Schellenberger
00:26:38.620 talks about that a lot.
00:26:41.080 Do you think what he's talking about
00:26:42.940 is similar to this outdoor
00:26:44.760 free drug clinics?
00:26:47.600 No.
00:26:48.620 No, he didn't say that.
00:26:50.160 You're conflating two stories.
00:26:52.320 That's the problem here.
00:26:53.380 You're conflating the homeless problem,
00:26:55.500 which he's not even talking about.
00:26:57.080 That's not his topic.
00:26:59.200 Giving free drugs to homeless people
00:27:01.220 doesn't make them be less homeless.
00:27:02.920 So, if you're trying to clean up San Francisco,
00:27:07.160 which is all the homeless people
00:27:08.940 walking around and taking over the city,
00:27:12.160 giving them free drugs
00:27:13.380 is not going to make them
00:27:14.420 leave the streets or go away or anything.
00:27:16.920 So, it doesn't do anything about homeless.
00:27:19.760 But what I don't know
00:27:20.900 is if it reduced the number of
00:27:23.220 overdoses.
00:27:26.540 I haven't heard one way or the other,
00:27:28.100 so I don't know.
00:27:29.120 But what Doc Anarchy is talking about
00:27:32.020 is really just a narrow point
00:27:34.740 that if the only kind of opioid
00:27:37.140 that was available,
00:27:38.120 and let's say there was some way
00:27:39.080 to make that happen,
00:27:40.100 if the only kind available
00:27:41.300 was high-quality control,
00:27:45.300 that that alone would
00:27:46.520 eliminate 99% of overdose deaths.
00:27:50.240 What do you think?
00:27:50.720 Now, let me be
00:27:56.000 coldly analytical here.
00:27:59.740 What would happen
00:28:00.400 if you stopped 100,000 addicts
00:28:03.400 per year from dying?
00:28:06.920 Now, this is going to come back to me.
00:28:09.640 So, do not think I'm exempting myself
00:28:13.760 from the following point.
00:28:15.120 I'm not.
00:28:15.940 I'm in this point.
00:28:17.600 If you let 100,000 addicts live
00:28:20.220 every year,
00:28:21.220 are you better off?
00:28:23.400 Now, I obviously would like
00:28:25.040 my stepson to still be alive.
00:28:27.300 But are you better off?
00:28:29.440 I hate to say it,
00:28:30.340 but you're not better off.
00:28:31.860 I might have been better off
00:28:33.160 because I love him, right?
00:28:34.660 So I loved him.
00:28:35.800 So I might be better off
00:28:37.160 because I would prefer it.
00:28:38.540 But would you be better off
00:28:40.320 with my stepson back in society?
00:28:42.940 Not even close.
00:28:44.400 Sorry.
00:28:45.640 Sorry.
00:28:46.680 If you want to be honest,
00:28:47.960 you would not be better off
00:28:49.280 with him in society.
00:28:50.780 He was not adding.
00:28:52.080 He was just purely subtracting.
00:28:54.300 Sorry.
00:28:55.060 People loved him.
00:28:56.000 I mean, he was very popular
00:28:57.480 and lovable and stuff.
00:28:58.860 But he wasn't going to help.
00:29:01.500 So you have to ask yourself
00:29:03.100 if even if you could get
00:29:04.540 what you wanted,
00:29:05.980 do you really want it?
00:29:08.000 Because that's a fair question.
00:29:11.340 It's a fair question.
00:29:12.760 Now, I do think that
00:29:13.760 some kind of ethical,
00:29:15.740 moral consideration
00:29:16.620 suggests that keeping them alive
00:29:19.020 would be the better alternative.
00:29:20.980 And that would be
00:29:21.480 a reasonable point of view.
00:29:23.300 But you can't ignore the fact
00:29:25.360 that keeping alive
00:29:26.580 100,000 liars
00:29:29.360 has some impact.
00:29:31.580 Because remember,
00:29:32.300 all addicts are liars.
00:29:33.640 You know that, right?
00:29:34.360 If you see somebody
00:29:36.760 who's lying about everything,
00:29:38.420 the first question
00:29:39.560 you should ask yourself is,
00:29:41.140 what drugs are they on?
00:29:43.000 Because often people
00:29:43.920 who are lying about everything
00:29:45.300 are covering a drug pattern.
00:29:49.900 So always look for that.
00:29:51.400 Sometimes lying about everything
00:29:52.640 means you're a narcissist.
00:29:55.800 And sometimes it means
00:29:57.060 you have a drug problem.
00:29:58.020 And sometimes it means
00:29:59.260 you're both.
00:30:01.560 I made the point
00:30:02.880 that insurance predicts all.
00:30:05.820 This is a point
00:30:06.520 I've made a number of times.
00:30:08.260 That every time
00:30:08.780 we're arguing
00:30:09.320 in the political realm
00:30:10.900 about what is
00:30:11.920 or what isn't,
00:30:12.600 what's true,
00:30:13.180 what isn't,
00:30:14.060 that you can ignore
00:30:15.120 all of that
00:30:15.840 because that's all political.
00:30:17.700 And just look
00:30:18.340 what the insurance companies do.
00:30:20.480 Because the insurance companies
00:30:21.800 don't have the option
00:30:22.720 of being political.
00:30:24.220 They just have to look
00:30:25.140 at the numbers
00:30:25.620 and say,
00:30:26.020 well,
00:30:26.640 we've got to set our premiums
00:30:28.180 based on this level of death.
00:30:29.800 And we have to adjust it
00:30:33.580 based on what changes, right?
00:30:35.900 So the insurance company
00:30:37.920 is just coldly looking at data.
00:30:40.200 And the other thing
00:30:40.860 that the insurance companies have
00:30:42.400 that you don't have
00:30:44.140 is their internal data.
00:30:46.740 So an insurance company
00:30:48.300 in 2022
00:30:49.040 can tell you the following.
00:30:51.180 It can tell you
00:30:52.060 which zip codes
00:30:53.060 had the most vaccinations,
00:30:55.140 the highest vaccination rates.
00:30:56.500 And it can tell you
00:30:58.160 where there was
00:30:59.340 the biggest change
00:31:00.360 in death rates.
00:31:02.380 Now,
00:31:02.820 what the insurance industry
00:31:04.000 is telling you
00:31:04.740 is that where there were
00:31:06.220 high levels of vaccinations,
00:31:08.140 the death rate
00:31:09.240 did not go up
00:31:10.100 nearly as much
00:31:10.860 as where there was
00:31:11.620 a low level of vaccination.
00:31:13.920 Maybe there's
00:31:14.540 some other factors involved.
00:31:16.540 But their data
00:31:17.860 is very clear
00:31:18.760 that vaccinations
00:31:19.880 saved lives.
00:31:21.520 And so they're going to
00:31:22.120 base their premiums
00:31:25.280 on that.
00:31:26.380 So if you're in a zip code
00:31:27.580 where people are dying
00:31:28.640 because they're unvaccinated,
00:31:30.020 maybe you pay more
00:31:30.860 for insurance.
00:31:32.620 Now,
00:31:33.220 where do you find the data?
00:31:35.360 They have their own data.
00:31:36.860 That's the key.
00:31:37.940 If you say to yourself,
00:31:39.220 why do the insurance companies
00:31:40.980 believe that?
00:31:42.160 Show me the data.
00:31:44.020 They're not going to do that
00:31:45.060 because it's internal data.
00:31:46.600 It's their own customers
00:31:47.580 who are dying, right?
00:31:49.060 They're literally looking
00:31:50.080 at their own customer base
00:31:51.440 and they're saying
00:31:52.320 the ones in this zip code
00:31:53.700 are suddenly dying.
00:31:55.280 The ones in this zip code
00:31:56.560 are also suddenly dying
00:31:57.720 but at a smaller rate.
00:32:01.200 Now,
00:32:01.960 a number of people
00:32:03.800 said to me,
00:32:04.540 Scott, Scott, Scott.
00:32:06.240 What you don't realize
00:32:07.420 is that insurance companies
00:32:08.660 are lying
00:32:09.440 just like all companies.
00:32:11.180 And what they're doing
00:32:12.000 is they're trying
00:32:12.760 to be woke
00:32:13.560 by telling you
00:32:15.100 that vaccinations work.
00:32:16.580 It's really just wokeness.
00:32:18.360 So they're not using data
00:32:19.980 to make decisions.
00:32:20.980 They're not trying
00:32:21.560 to make money.
00:32:22.220 They're trying
00:32:23.340 to be woke
00:32:23.980 because that's more important
00:32:25.120 than profits.
00:32:26.880 Do you know
00:32:27.540 who says that sort of thing?
00:32:28.840 Do you know
00:32:29.380 who says that
00:32:30.160 an insurance company
00:32:31.300 favors wokeness
00:32:33.040 over profits?
00:32:34.600 What kind of person
00:32:35.320 says that?
00:32:37.800 Characterize somebody
00:32:38.660 who would say
00:32:39.320 that they might
00:32:40.800 prefer wokeness
00:32:42.220 over profits.
00:32:43.220 You're saying idiots
00:32:46.320 but that's unkind.
00:32:48.160 I'm going to give
00:32:49.120 the kindest interpretation.
00:32:50.700 It's people
00:32:51.040 with no experience
00:32:51.980 in business whatsoever.
00:32:54.660 You don't have to say
00:32:55.760 NPC or stupid.
00:32:57.580 Just say this.
00:32:58.360 People with no experience
00:32:59.720 in business whatsoever.
00:33:01.340 I don't believe
00:33:01.980 there are any
00:33:02.400 experienced business people
00:33:03.820 who would say
00:33:05.340 that an insurance company
00:33:06.560 is going to put itself
00:33:07.680 on a business
00:33:08.320 to serve wokeness.
00:33:11.880 I don't think so.
00:33:13.220 Now people said to me
00:33:14.560 but Scott
00:33:15.220 but Scott
00:33:16.120 Disney did exactly that.
00:33:18.680 They made a bad decision
00:33:19.740 for wokeness
00:33:20.600 and it hurt their profitability.
00:33:22.760 So what about that?
00:33:24.060 To which I say
00:33:24.960 that's not what I'm talking about.
00:33:26.520 That's a completely
00:33:27.120 different situation.
00:33:28.920 Yes, companies will
00:33:30.380 make public PR statements
00:33:32.380 that are for wokeness.
00:33:36.900 But that doesn't mean
00:33:38.140 they're intentionally
00:33:38.800 destroying the engine
00:33:40.300 of their economic survival.
00:33:43.220 If an insurance company
00:33:44.480 starts pricing things
00:33:45.760 incorrectly
00:33:46.320 they go into business.
00:33:48.960 They have to price correctly
00:33:50.620 based on their data
00:33:51.540 or they can't stay in business.
00:33:53.540 That is completely different.
00:33:55.360 Staying in business
00:33:56.460 versus saying some things
00:33:58.440 in public
00:33:58.860 you think will sound good
00:34:00.100 but you hope
00:34:00.600 it won't hurt you too much.
00:34:02.500 Disney made a gigantic mistake
00:34:04.340 but they didn't do it
00:34:06.580 intentionally.
00:34:07.320 they did not intentionally
00:34:09.860 destroy their business
00:34:11.160 or degrade it
00:34:12.440 by doing something
00:34:14.260 like that.
00:34:15.060 I don't think
00:34:15.860 they quite saw
00:34:16.460 the DeSantis pushback coming.
00:34:19.220 So to imagine
00:34:20.760 that it's similar
00:34:21.620 that somebody
00:34:22.240 accidentally hurts
00:34:23.640 their business
00:34:24.160 by saying things
00:34:24.880 they think wouldn't hurt
00:34:26.120 but it did
00:34:26.720 that's completely different
00:34:28.460 from an insurance company
00:34:29.560 saying look
00:34:30.060 we'd better make ourselves
00:34:31.900 super unprofitable
00:34:33.380 or else we won't
00:34:35.660 look woke enough.
00:34:37.240 That's not happening.
00:34:39.180 That's not happening
00:34:40.100 anywhere
00:34:40.640 ever.
00:34:42.120 Ever.
00:34:43.200 No insurance company
00:34:44.320 behind the scenes
00:34:46.040 is going to tell you
00:34:47.260 well behind the scenes
00:34:48.620 they're going to make money.
00:34:50.500 They wouldn't be
00:34:51.300 talking out loud
00:34:52.060 to help themselves
00:34:52.900 in this case.
00:34:55.100 Do you think
00:34:55.700 yeah I feel
00:34:57.720 it would just hurt them
00:34:58.580 if you knew
00:34:59.720 what they were doing.
00:35:00.280 They're just trying
00:35:00.720 to make money.
00:35:01.980 Period.
00:35:02.960 Alright.
00:35:03.380 There is something called
00:35:06.200 and I don't know
00:35:06.900 too much about it
00:35:07.760 some kind of
00:35:08.720 the QPARQ
00:35:10.980 Q-P-A-R-Q
00:35:12.980 framework
00:35:14.300 for
00:35:15.060 having rational discussions
00:35:17.440 without all the
00:35:18.460 crazy stuff that happens.
00:35:20.640 I saw Brett Weinstein
00:35:21.980 talking about it
00:35:23.120 and I think he invited
00:35:24.160 Sam Harris
00:35:24.780 to be part of it
00:35:25.520 and the idea is
00:35:26.560 there's this
00:35:27.040 useful framework
00:35:28.800 for debating
00:35:30.700 and if you use
00:35:31.660 the framework
00:35:32.160 and I think there's
00:35:32.960 some software
00:35:33.800 that helps you
00:35:34.320 work through it
00:35:34.800 or something
00:35:35.140 I don't know
00:35:35.780 all the details
00:35:36.300 but the idea is
00:35:37.620 that you could use
00:35:38.400 some third party
00:35:39.800 format
00:35:41.200 to keep two people
00:35:43.720 on a sane
00:35:44.580 and reasonable
00:35:45.240 debate.
00:35:47.380 What do you think
00:35:48.140 of that?
00:35:48.620 Suppose the technology
00:35:49.600 works
00:35:50.060 so let's take
00:35:51.420 an assumption
00:35:51.880 I don't know
00:35:52.480 that that's true
00:35:52.960 but let's say
00:35:53.440 the technology works
00:35:54.640 will this change
00:35:56.140 everything?
00:35:56.480 because now
00:35:58.720 you'd have a way
00:35:59.280 for people
00:36:00.020 to debate
00:36:00.680 getting rid
00:36:01.540 of all the crazy
00:36:02.140 parts
00:36:02.500 so you could
00:36:02.920 actually see
00:36:03.360 the debate
00:36:03.760 no it won't
00:36:05.960 do you know
00:36:06.420 what's wrong
00:36:06.820 with this problem?
00:36:09.280 It solves
00:36:10.180 the non-existing
00:36:10.860 problem
00:36:11.460 because the reason
00:36:13.640 that people
00:36:14.080 say crazy things
00:36:17.300 during debates
00:36:17.920 is that they don't
00:36:18.580 want to say
00:36:19.060 the real thing
00:36:19.600 the real thing
00:36:20.900 doesn't help them
00:36:21.620 the reason
00:36:22.940 people lie
00:36:23.540 is that the truth
00:36:24.220 doesn't give them
00:36:24.880 power or entertainment
00:36:26.040 people want to
00:36:28.660 watch the news
00:36:29.360 or interpret the news
00:36:31.200 or get their
00:36:31.800 preferred interpretation
00:36:32.840 to the news
00:36:33.440 they want to win
00:36:34.380 debates because
00:36:35.080 they want power
00:36:35.800 and we watch them
00:36:37.800 because we want
00:36:38.400 entertainment
00:36:38.940 as soon as you
00:36:40.760 imagine that people's
00:36:41.860 main motivation
00:36:42.700 is to get something
00:36:43.580 right
00:36:43.980 you're completely
00:36:45.860 lost
00:36:46.380 nobody's main
00:36:48.640 motivation is to
00:36:49.480 get the right answer
00:36:50.340 the main motivation
00:36:52.560 is to be right
00:36:53.480 and to get power
00:36:54.260 now people think
00:36:55.580 that if they had
00:36:56.160 power they would
00:36:56.800 do the right things
00:36:57.680 in some way
00:36:58.220 that's the right
00:36:58.720 thing too
00:36:59.080 but nobody cares
00:37:00.600 about the logic
00:37:01.680 of a debate
00:37:02.380 so you're solving
00:37:04.180 a problem
00:37:04.680 that isn't a problem
00:37:05.900 because debates
00:37:07.300 are intentionally
00:37:08.260 bullshit
00:37:08.760 if anybody
00:37:10.660 wanted to
00:37:11.260 debate
00:37:12.880 in a reasonable
00:37:13.780 way
00:37:14.160 they already
00:37:14.860 know how to
00:37:15.340 do it
00:37:15.760 do you think
00:37:18.180 that Brett
00:37:18.780 Weinstein
00:37:19.400 and Sam
00:37:20.060 Harrison
00:37:20.360 don't have
00:37:21.320 the intellectual
00:37:22.000 tools
00:37:22.760 to have
00:37:24.140 a rational
00:37:24.920 discussion
00:37:26.620 of course
00:37:27.740 they do
00:37:28.200 of course
00:37:28.980 they do
00:37:29.380 but would
00:37:30.620 they do it
00:37:31.820 I don't know
00:37:34.540 those might be
00:37:36.260 two of the most
00:37:36.940 famously rational
00:37:38.120 people
00:37:38.600 in the public
00:37:40.380 discussions
00:37:40.940 and I don't
00:37:42.480 even think
00:37:42.820 they could do it
00:37:43.480 and I have
00:37:44.740 very high opinion
00:37:45.460 of both of them
00:37:46.080 in terms of
00:37:46.660 their intellectual
00:37:47.580 academic credentials
00:37:49.340 I just don't
00:37:50.640 know it's
00:37:50.960 something people
00:37:51.600 can do
00:37:52.120 because
00:37:53.840 I had a
00:37:55.280 conversation
00:37:55.740 with Sam
00:37:56.220 Harris
00:37:56.500 and it was
00:37:57.520 not my
00:37:57.980 opinion
00:37:58.280 that logic
00:37:58.900 was guiding
00:37:59.520 his
00:37:59.980 opinion
00:38:02.040 some of
00:38:03.520 some of you
00:38:03.640 saw it
00:38:03.960 too
00:38:04.100 did you
00:38:05.440 have a
00:38:05.700 sense
00:38:05.940 that
00:38:06.260 he
00:38:07.460 preferred
00:38:08.220 logic
00:38:09.380 I didn't
00:38:11.200 get the
00:38:11.940 sense
00:38:12.180 that it
00:38:12.480 was even
00:38:12.800 a preference
00:38:13.460 it felt
00:38:14.880 like a
00:38:15.700 strong
00:38:16.040 preference
00:38:16.420 to avoid
00:38:17.140 being
00:38:18.380 rational
00:38:18.780 about
00:38:19.080 Trump
00:38:19.380 that's
00:38:21.620 how it
00:38:21.840 felt
00:38:22.020 now again
00:38:22.600 I can't
00:38:23.160 read his
00:38:23.460 mind
00:38:23.880 I don't
00:38:24.280 know what
00:38:24.540 Sam Harris
00:38:25.060 is thinking
00:38:25.800 privately
00:38:26.740 about
00:38:27.140 anything
00:38:27.480 so it's
00:38:28.440 just
00:38:28.620 it's
00:38:28.920 just
00:38:29.100 a reaction
00:38:29.780 you know
00:38:30.900 basically a reaction
00:38:32.080 on my end
00:38:32.600 it's not
00:38:32.920 about him
00:38:33.300 all right
00:38:35.280 so
00:38:36.620 I love
00:38:38.180 the fact
00:38:38.540 that somebody
00:38:39.060 is working
00:38:39.480 on that
00:38:39.920 trying to
00:38:40.600 get our
00:38:40.960 our
00:38:41.980 conversations
00:38:42.700 realistic
00:38:44.040 but I think
00:38:45.060 AI is going
00:38:45.760 to solve
00:38:46.020 this problem
00:38:46.460 for us
00:38:46.980 and here's
00:38:47.880 how
00:38:48.080 I think
00:38:49.080 AI is going
00:38:49.960 to take
00:38:50.220 any story
00:38:50.860 and add
00:38:51.660 the context
00:38:52.340 that is
00:38:53.200 missing
00:38:53.500 and it's
00:38:55.160 going to
00:38:55.380 rewrite it
00:38:55.880 in simpler
00:38:56.320 terms
00:38:56.740 and make
00:38:58.280 the misleading
00:38:58.940 headlines
00:38:59.440 go away
00:38:59.940 it should
00:39:01.440 not be
00:39:01.860 hard
00:39:02.160 for AI
00:39:02.820 to dismantle
00:39:04.580 fake news
00:39:05.320 and tell you
00:39:06.740 what was fake
00:39:07.360 about it
00:39:07.740 just like I
00:39:08.280 did basically
00:39:08.780 so what I
00:39:09.760 did was I
00:39:10.360 said hey
00:39:10.980 this title
00:39:11.500 doesn't match
00:39:12.220 or is misleading
00:39:13.040 compared to
00:39:14.540 the content
00:39:15.020 I think AI
00:39:15.860 could do that
00:39:16.420 most of the
00:39:16.800 time
00:39:17.080 and I think
00:39:18.240 they could
00:39:18.520 summarize better
00:39:19.320 and I think
00:39:20.900 they could
00:39:21.460 basically solve
00:39:23.040 fake news
00:39:23.740 I mean
00:39:24.580 they could
00:39:24.820 come close
00:39:25.520 is Google
00:39:30.040 the top AI
00:39:30.780 I actually
00:39:31.340 don't know
00:39:31.700 that
00:39:31.980 and I
00:39:33.940 believe I
00:39:34.420 credited the
00:39:35.820 wrong person
00:39:36.480 with saying
00:39:36.900 that AI
00:39:37.360 was conscious
00:39:38.480 so I
00:39:40.160 saw a
00:39:40.640 follow up
00:39:41.100 I saw a
00:39:44.840 follow up
00:39:45.220 saying that
00:39:45.620 I may have
00:39:46.100 credited the
00:39:46.980 top Google
00:39:47.620 researcher
00:39:48.160 for saying
00:39:49.080 that AI
00:39:50.360 was conscious
00:39:51.140 but
00:39:51.840 at least
00:39:53.200 somebody who
00:39:53.680 knows what
00:39:54.000 they're talking
00:39:54.340 about thinks
00:39:54.900 I was
00:39:55.340 crediting the
00:39:56.040 wrong person
00:39:56.620 because I
00:39:57.160 think the
00:39:57.520 actual Google
00:39:58.200 head does
00:39:59.280 not say
00:39:59.680 that
00:39:59.960 so somebody
00:40:01.860 who's
00:40:02.320 high up in
00:40:04.540 that world
00:40:04.920 did say
00:40:05.340 it
00:40:05.840 alright
00:40:12.760 he was
00:40:13.860 considered
00:40:14.340 one of the
00:40:14.840 four horsemen
00:40:15.340 of atheism
00:40:15.940 yeah
00:40:16.200 code of
00:40:20.860 the
00:40:20.980 life
00:40:21.180 maker
00:40:21.600 alright
00:40:22.100 just
00:40:22.300 looking
00:40:22.520 at
00:40:22.660 your
00:40:22.920 your
00:40:24.640 comments
00:40:25.020 well
00:40:25.560 that's
00:40:25.800 all I
00:40:26.000 had to
00:40:26.240 do
00:40:26.600 to talk
00:40:27.680 about
00:40:27.880 today
00:40:28.220 I
00:40:28.680 noticed
00:40:28.960 Greg
00:40:29.420 Guffeld
00:40:29.840 was
00:40:30.220 trending
00:40:32.380 today
00:40:32.820 his
00:40:34.260 show
00:40:34.860 has
00:40:35.000 continued
00:40:35.380 to be
00:40:35.900 gigantically
00:40:36.840 popular
00:40:37.840 it was
00:40:42.180 weird
00:40:42.420 that weirdo
00:40:43.040 hired a
00:40:43.480 lawyer
00:40:43.700 for the
00:40:44.000 AI
00:40:44.260 I don't
00:40:45.820 know that
00:40:46.120 story
00:40:46.460 oh let's
00:40:50.080 talk about
00:40:50.700 Pelosi going
00:40:52.200 to Taiwan
00:40:52.800 I don't know
00:40:53.940 is that really
00:40:54.380 a story
00:40:54.800 I think it
00:40:56.900 would be a
00:40:57.300 story if
00:40:57.760 Pelosi didn't
00:40:58.500 go to
00:40:58.840 Taiwan
00:40:59.840 if you know
00:41:00.760 she had
00:41:01.000 wanted to
00:41:01.400 and changed
00:41:01.900 her mind
00:41:02.300 or something
00:41:02.660 but
00:41:03.660 I feel
00:41:06.620 as though
00:41:07.200 it's sort
00:41:08.900 of a
00:41:09.100 nothing
00:41:09.400 it's
00:41:12.660 absolutely
00:41:13.060 a story
00:41:13.720 because we'll
00:41:14.240 talk about
00:41:14.820 it
00:41:15.060 but what
00:41:15.820 do you
00:41:15.960 think
00:41:16.100 China is
00:41:16.500 going to
00:41:16.740 do
00:41:17.020 do you
00:41:17.780 think
00:41:17.940 China is
00:41:18.400 going to
00:41:18.740 punish
00:41:19.120 the
00:41:19.300 United
00:41:19.540 States
00:41:19.860 in some
00:41:20.240 way
00:41:20.420 for an
00:41:21.300 American
00:41:21.560 citizen
00:41:22.100 who is
00:41:23.060 a free
00:41:23.360 citizen
00:41:23.760 going to
00:41:24.260 another
00:41:24.520 free
00:41:24.780 country
00:41:25.080 to
00:41:25.260 visit
00:41:25.460 you
00:41:26.240 think
00:41:26.440 they're
00:41:26.620 going to
00:41:26.780 punish
00:41:27.020 us
00:41:27.220 for that
00:41:27.560 I
00:41:28.720 hope
00:41:28.980 so
00:41:29.300 boy do
00:41:34.320 I hope
00:41:34.640 China tries
00:41:35.260 to punish
00:41:35.700 us for
00:41:36.320 Pelosi
00:41:36.740 visiting
00:41:37.200 Taiwan
00:41:37.600 yeah
00:41:38.780 I hope
00:41:39.260 so
00:41:39.640 because
00:41:42.220 we definitely
00:41:44.060 need to be
00:41:44.760 murdering
00:41:45.380 their
00:41:45.700 fentanyl
00:41:47.220 dealers
00:41:47.660 in China
00:41:49.480 so if
00:41:50.520 there's
00:41:51.080 something
00:41:51.300 they're
00:41:51.540 doing
00:41:51.680 to us
00:41:52.080 let's
00:41:52.940 ratchet
00:41:54.200 it up
00:41:54.500 on our
00:41:54.780 side
00:41:55.020 too
00:41:55.240 let's
00:41:56.660 go kill
00:41:57.060 their
00:41:57.280 fentanyl
00:41:57.780 dealers
00:41:58.100 where they
00:41:58.460 stand
00:41:58.820 did you
00:42:01.100 see that
00:42:01.700 there's
00:42:02.140 a
00:42:02.600 I tweeted
00:42:04.380 this but
00:42:04.940 I forgot
00:42:05.380 to put
00:42:05.820 it in
00:42:05.960 my notes
00:42:06.320 there's
00:42:07.680 a
00:42:07.960 candidate
00:42:09.280 for
00:42:09.660 Arizona
00:42:10.200 attorney
00:42:10.660 general
00:42:11.080 let me
00:42:12.980 find his
00:42:13.380 name so
00:42:13.900 I can
00:42:14.140 give him
00:42:14.380 a little
00:42:14.720 shout out
00:42:15.840 here
00:42:16.100 probably
00:42:18.840 didn't
00:42:19.120 write it
00:42:19.440 down
00:42:20.080 damn
00:42:21.000 me
00:42:21.180 for not
00:42:21.520 writing
00:42:21.800 that
00:42:21.980 down
00:42:22.240 somebody
00:42:23.560 will
00:42:23.740 give me
00:42:24.700 the name
00:42:25.040 here in
00:42:25.320 the comments
00:42:25.760 but
00:42:26.800 there's
00:42:27.240 a
00:42:27.780 candidate
00:42:28.220 for
00:42:28.680 attorney
00:42:29.340 general
00:42:29.940 in
00:42:30.840 Arizona
00:42:33.740 who
00:42:35.540 says we
00:42:36.480 should
00:42:36.780 at least
00:42:37.600 that Arizona
00:42:38.220 should treat
00:42:38.860 the or
00:42:39.540 label the
00:42:40.240 cartels as
00:42:40.880 terrorist
00:42:41.180 organizations
00:42:41.800 so if the
00:42:44.160 federal government
00:42:44.820 will not
00:42:45.620 label
00:42:46.320 the cartels as
00:42:49.240 terrorist
00:42:49.520 organizations
00:42:50.160 Arizona
00:42:50.780 might do
00:42:52.200 it if
00:42:53.020 they elect
00:42:53.520 this
00:42:53.820 attorney
00:42:55.060 general
00:42:55.460 and if
00:42:56.020 he gets
00:42:56.340 his way
00:42:56.720 and
00:42:57.780 apparently
00:42:58.140 there's
00:42:58.780 some
00:42:59.360 constitutional
00:43:00.980 allowance
00:43:01.860 I've never
00:43:02.440 heard this
00:43:02.780 before
00:43:03.100 but have
00:43:03.820 you heard
00:43:04.140 that states
00:43:04.800 can create
00:43:05.420 their own
00:43:05.980 national
00:43:06.480 like a
00:43:07.520 state guard
00:43:08.000 not a
00:43:08.340 national
00:43:08.580 guard
00:43:08.840 have you
00:43:09.800 heard that
00:43:10.080 states
00:43:10.400 can form
00:43:10.880 their own
00:43:11.600 armies
00:43:12.660 basically
00:43:13.120 apparently
00:43:14.880 that's a
00:43:15.300 thing
00:43:15.600 yeah
00:43:16.600 so
00:43:17.520 the
00:43:18.280 Arizona
00:43:18.720 potential
00:43:20.540 AG
00:43:21.360 guy running
00:43:22.120 as a
00:43:22.460 Republican
00:43:22.800 will
00:43:24.580 somebody
00:43:24.820 give me
00:43:25.080 his name
00:43:25.480 he deserves
00:43:27.440 a shout
00:43:27.840 out
00:43:28.100 just google
00:43:30.520 that for
00:43:30.940 me
00:43:31.100 give me
00:43:31.760 a shout
00:43:32.080 out in
00:43:32.400 the comments
00:43:33.020 because I
00:43:33.580 don't want
00:43:33.820 to not
00:43:34.060 mention
00:43:34.300 his name
00:43:34.680 he's too
00:43:36.260 strong
00:43:36.720 Evergrand
00:43:37.720 no
00:43:38.140 Hamada
00:43:38.580 Hamaday
00:43:39.300 so his
00:43:40.340 last name
00:43:40.880 is H
00:43:41.420 A M
00:43:42.100 A
00:43:42.560 D
00:43:43.000 E
00:43:43.540 H
00:43:44.540 Hamaday
00:43:45.560 so he's
00:43:46.820 Republican
00:43:47.320 and
00:43:48.820 Abe
00:43:49.960 Hamaday
00:43:50.420 okay
00:43:50.820 he's
00:43:51.780 Republican
00:43:52.260 and he's
00:43:53.320 tough on
00:43:54.000 the cartels
00:43:54.760 and
00:43:55.180 I like
00:43:57.340 him
00:43:57.520 I like
00:43:58.980 him
00:43:59.180 I like
00:44:01.400 him for
00:44:01.620 that
00:44:01.820 I don't
00:44:02.120 know what
00:44:02.340 else he
00:44:02.600 does
00:44:02.780 oh
00:44:04.200 Gottfeld's
00:44:04.740 still
00:44:04.940 trending
00:44:05.320 let's
00:44:07.620 see why
00:44:08.100 there's a
00:44:10.920 July 25th
00:44:12.040 Glenn Greenwald
00:44:12.960 tweet about
00:44:14.320 the Gottfeld
00:44:14.800 show how
00:44:15.300 it's basically
00:44:16.060 mopping up
00:44:16.620 the competition
00:44:17.260 now
00:44:18.420 so it's
00:44:24.140 fun to
00:44:24.440 it's fun to
00:44:24.960 watch him
00:44:25.340 succeed
00:44:25.780 I hope
00:44:26.380 you're
00:44:27.040 enjoying it
00:44:27.500 as much
00:44:27.800 as I
00:44:28.060 do
00:44:28.560 all right
00:44:32.700 here's
00:44:34.640 a
00:44:34.940 huh
00:44:37.640 all right
00:44:39.320 here's a
00:44:39.780 little
00:44:41.000 information on
00:44:42.060 fentanyl
00:44:42.680 and the
00:44:43.360 Dr.
00:44:43.880 Anarchy
00:44:44.240 comment
00:44:45.740 I don't
00:44:46.820 want to
00:44:47.060 attribute this
00:44:47.720 yet but let's
00:44:48.220 just say it's
00:44:48.660 from another
00:44:49.100 doctor
00:44:49.440 and
00:44:50.780 Doc Anarchy
00:44:51.880 I better read
00:44:53.080 it to myself
00:44:53.560 before I read
00:44:54.120 it out loud
00:44:54.520 oh okay
00:44:58.860 so it's
00:45:00.180 hard to
00:45:00.740 overdose on
00:45:01.820 oral
00:45:03.340 opiates
00:45:04.000 so I think
00:45:05.340 that's what
00:45:05.720 Dr.
00:45:06.020 Anarchy was
00:45:06.740 saying it's
00:45:07.140 hard to
00:45:07.560 it's sort
00:45:08.980 of rare
00:45:09.620 to overdose
00:45:11.000 on prescription
00:45:12.100 pills
00:45:13.400 but if you
00:45:15.340 mix it
00:45:15.840 if you add a
00:45:17.560 second medication
00:45:18.300 called
00:45:19.600 benzodiazepine
00:45:21.440 it becomes
00:45:22.500 very easy
00:45:23.120 oh and
00:45:24.980 90% of
00:45:25.880 prescription
00:45:26.380 opiate
00:45:26.840 overdoses
00:45:27.420 include that
00:45:28.400 drug
00:45:28.840 benzodiazepine
00:45:30.600 oh wow
00:45:33.300 so that's a
00:45:35.660 special case
00:45:36.280 but I don't
00:45:36.840 think that
00:45:37.320 I don't think
00:45:39.140 that takes
00:45:39.760 away from
00:45:40.380 Doc Anarchy's
00:45:41.180 point because
00:45:42.940 you know the
00:45:43.960 people who are
00:45:44.420 not taking
00:45:45.580 this other
00:45:45.980 drug at the
00:45:46.420 same time
00:45:46.820 would get a
00:45:47.540 lot of
00:45:47.700 benefit
00:45:47.960 all right
00:45:49.640 so this is
00:45:50.580 good context
00:45:51.940 all right
00:45:53.480 all right
00:45:57.760 and that
00:45:58.660 that
00:46:03.400 is what I
00:46:05.620 had to talk
00:46:06.000 about today
00:46:06.400 yeah Carrie
00:46:08.540 Lake is tough
00:46:09.320 on the cartels
00:46:10.020 as well
00:46:10.400 also running
00:46:11.240 what is she
00:46:11.700 running for
00:46:12.060 governor of
00:46:12.660 Arizona
00:46:13.000 yes it is a
00:46:15.400 great show
00:46:15.840 it is a great
00:46:16.540 show
00:46:16.800 you know the
00:46:18.380 the larger
00:46:19.480 point is that
00:46:20.200 I'm right about
00:46:21.020 everything today
00:46:23.120 all right
00:46:26.440 how did I
00:46:28.460 determine that
00:46:29.140 the Democrats
00:46:29.660 put a poison
00:46:30.340 bill in the
00:46:31.060 pact bill
00:46:31.920 look
00:46:34.880 well google
00:46:36.020 it and you
00:46:36.680 should find
00:46:37.120 that the
00:46:37.460 bill includes
00:46:38.100 things that
00:46:39.200 are off
00:46:39.600 point and
00:46:41.100 that the
00:46:41.620 Republicans
00:46:42.220 cared about
00:46:43.980 that I
00:46:45.580 feel like
00:46:45.940 there was a
00:46:46.480 story I
00:46:47.120 skipped here
00:46:47.660 that I
00:46:48.240 really wanted
00:46:48.740 to do
00:46:49.160 let's check
00:46:51.820 yeah
00:46:55.420 did you
00:46:58.180 affect the
00:46:58.840 DeSantis
00:46:59.280 ESG move
00:47:00.440 I did not
00:47:01.040 I mean I
00:47:02.220 don't think
00:47:02.520 I did
00:47:02.800 okay
00:47:07.740 what's my
00:47:13.380 prediction for
00:47:14.040 China's
00:47:14.600 response
00:47:15.120 I don't
00:47:16.780 know I
00:47:17.340 think it's
00:47:17.880 going to be
00:47:18.220 symbolic
00:47:18.840 I don't
00:47:20.960 think China's
00:47:21.560 response will
00:47:22.240 affect you as
00:47:23.060 a citizen of
00:47:23.740 the United
00:47:24.080 States
00:47:24.460 I feel like
00:47:25.520 they might do
00:47:26.000 something like
00:47:26.500 move some
00:47:27.000 warships around
00:47:27.940 or you know
00:47:29.560 talk differently
00:47:31.800 I don't know
00:47:32.600 I just don't
00:47:33.100 think it's
00:47:33.460 going to be
00:47:33.780 anything
00:47:34.080 they have to
00:47:34.800 push back
00:47:35.480 the famine
00:47:38.860 coming
00:47:39.240 I'm going to
00:47:40.340 vote against
00:47:40.780 the famine
00:47:41.260 based on
00:47:44.300 the Adams
00:47:44.960 law of
00:47:45.560 slow moving
00:47:46.140 disasters
00:47:46.760 now I know
00:47:47.680 this one's
00:47:48.160 special because
00:47:49.460 you can't
00:47:50.040 grow food
00:47:50.620 very quickly
00:47:51.360 so if the
00:47:52.580 food you
00:47:52.980 grew doesn't
00:47:53.960 produce
00:47:54.620 that's not
00:47:55.800 really a
00:47:56.180 quick turnaround
00:47:56.760 fix I get
00:47:57.720 that but I'm
00:47:59.180 going to vote
00:47:59.640 against mass
00:48:00.620 famine
00:48:01.000 now I don't
00:48:03.100 know that I'm
00:48:03.620 right so I'm
00:48:04.900 not going to
00:48:05.200 put 100% on
00:48:06.040 this one
00:48:06.380 I usually
00:48:07.580 don't but
00:48:08.580 I'd say I'm
00:48:09.820 going to put
00:48:10.080 a 90% odds
00:48:11.280 of no famine
00:48:12.380 and the reason
00:48:14.100 is that humans
00:48:16.160 are just really
00:48:17.060 really good at
00:48:18.400 responding to a
00:48:19.420 known problem
00:48:20.160 with enough time
00:48:21.020 to respond
00:48:21.620 and one way
00:48:23.980 or another I
00:48:24.460 feel like we
00:48:25.000 might be able
00:48:25.900 to get by
00:48:27.220 now I don't
00:48:28.120 think the
00:48:28.460 famine is for
00:48:29.760 the first world
00:48:30.500 countries it's
00:48:31.460 going to be for
00:48:32.000 who can't afford
00:48:32.900 to pay massive
00:48:34.240 prices to get
00:48:35.020 the limited
00:48:35.460 food but I
00:48:36.640 feel like we'll
00:48:37.180 figure out how
00:48:37.700 to keep them
00:48:38.100 alive long
00:48:38.640 enough to get
00:48:39.060 the next crop
00:48:39.760 going that's
00:48:41.000 what I feel
00:48:41.440 but we'll see
00:48:42.940 yeah Africa
00:48:44.260 could be tough
00:48:45.080 in Africa
00:48:45.520 I don't want to
00:48:47.000 minimize the
00:48:47.620 risk but I'm
00:48:49.240 confident we'll
00:48:49.960 figure it out
00:48:51.200 micro lessons on
00:48:53.920 how to make a
00:48:54.420 killer tweet I
00:48:55.660 can do that I
00:48:56.520 feel like maybe
00:48:57.180 I have
00:48:57.580 all right
00:49:03.060 and is there
00:49:08.120 any topic I
00:49:09.000 didn't cover
00:49:09.440 that you just
00:49:10.360 desperately need
00:49:11.480 me to
00:49:11.760 where am I
00:49:19.500 I'm at a
00:49:20.080 secret
00:49:20.620 writer's retreat
00:49:22.240 location
00:49:23.480 are you able
00:49:27.660 to smoke
00:49:28.200 while on
00:49:28.560 vacation
00:49:29.000 no comment
00:49:30.620 MTG was
00:49:34.280 acquitted of
00:49:34.900 what I
00:49:35.540 didn't know
00:49:35.880 there was
00:49:36.160 anything going
00:49:36.820 on
00:49:37.420 market index
00:49:39.580 was the market
00:49:40.680 up or down
00:49:41.180 make the sun
00:49:45.080 bigger
00:49:45.360 well I
00:49:51.980 could probably
00:49:52.400 tell you now
00:49:52.880 what makes a
00:49:53.400 killer tweet
00:49:53.980 you want your
00:49:56.720 killer tweet to
00:49:57.400 be short
00:49:58.220 and something
00:49:59.880 that people
00:50:00.580 would want to
00:50:01.160 say to their
00:50:01.840 friends so they
00:50:02.640 could remember
00:50:03.140 it easily
00:50:03.580 so it has to
00:50:04.600 be short and
00:50:05.140 clever
00:50:05.400 has to be on
00:50:07.300 a something
00:50:08.240 that's in the
00:50:08.720 headlines or
00:50:10.000 people are
00:50:10.440 really thinking
00:50:10.860 about right
00:50:11.320 now
00:50:11.680 I burned my
00:50:14.400 lip it's not
00:50:15.080 it's not a
00:50:16.000 monkeypox or
00:50:17.180 a weird
00:50:17.440 disease
00:50:17.880 it's just
00:50:19.500 a burn
00:50:19.880 and you
00:50:31.060 should always
00:50:31.520 be clever
00:50:32.320 and provocative
00:50:33.140 and ideally
00:50:34.240 say something
00:50:34.860 that's not
00:50:35.300 quite true
00:50:35.980 if you say
00:50:37.600 something that's
00:50:38.140 provocative and
00:50:38.880 sort of almost
00:50:39.820 true but not
00:50:40.900 quite you're
00:50:41.660 going to get
00:50:41.940 more energy
00:50:42.760 because people
00:50:43.680 want to
00:50:44.180 argue
00:50:44.880 you about
00:50:45.300 how true
00:50:45.900 it is
00:50:46.340 yeah
00:50:49.400 all right
00:50:50.200 let's
00:50:50.500 how about
00:50:50.820 less about
00:50:51.220 me
00:50:51.540 maybe
00:50:53.860 let's talk
00:50:54.600 less about
00:50:55.080 me
00:50:55.460 for a while
00:50:58.720 all right
00:51:00.780 talk about
00:51:05.860 Trump's
00:51:06.280 misspelled
00:51:06.680 tweets
00:51:07.100 I think
00:51:08.300 the misspelled
00:51:08.860 tweets are
00:51:09.480 not intentional
00:51:10.300 but I
00:51:12.260 think he
00:51:12.580 leaves them
00:51:13.160 intentionally
00:51:13.680 which is
00:51:14.480 different
00:51:14.840 you know
00:51:15.980 there have
00:51:16.440 been a number
00:51:16.820 of times
00:51:17.160 that I've
00:51:17.640 had a
00:51:18.420 typo
00:51:18.760 and a
00:51:19.000 tweet
00:51:19.240 and I've
00:51:21.180 decided to
00:51:21.780 leave it
00:51:22.220 because it
00:51:22.820 was getting
00:51:23.160 attention
00:51:23.600 so I think
00:51:27.120 that's all
00:51:27.480 that's happening
00:51:27.920 is Japan
00:51:28.800 safe
00:51:29.240 probably
00:51:29.760 give us
00:51:33.260 the women's
00:51:33.840 version of
00:51:34.420 the men's
00:51:34.960 secret lesson
00:51:35.860 I don't
00:51:36.920 know if I
00:51:37.220 could
00:51:37.540 I think
00:51:42.400 covfefe was
00:51:43.060 probably just a
00:51:43.660 pocket dial
00:51:44.280 no hints
00:51:48.300 all right
00:51:50.460 what was your
00:51:52.940 inspiration for
00:51:53.620 writing God's
00:51:54.320 Debris
00:51:54.620 if you don't
00:51:55.200 know I
00:51:55.520 wrote a
00:51:55.960 book called
00:51:56.320 God's
00:51:56.680 Debris
00:51:56.960 came out
00:51:57.620 about the
00:51:59.320 same time
00:51:59.720 the Twin
00:52:00.380 Towers
00:52:00.720 were falling
00:52:01.260 I think
00:52:01.620 but these
00:52:04.800 many years
00:52:05.260 later my
00:52:05.900 book God's
00:52:06.420 Debris is
00:52:06.940 still the
00:52:07.320 thing that
00:52:07.600 people talk
00:52:08.200 about the
00:52:08.600 most
00:52:08.980 when I'm
00:52:09.900 out in
00:52:10.160 public
00:52:10.520 these days
00:52:12.400 they're more
00:52:13.220 I guess
00:52:13.820 they'll more
00:52:14.140 often mention
00:52:15.280 coffee with
00:52:15.980 Scott Adams
00:52:16.480 but God's
00:52:18.940 Debris has
00:52:19.280 really made a
00:52:19.700 big impact
00:52:20.260 on people
00:52:20.680 and the
00:52:21.480 answer of
00:52:21.860 how I
00:52:22.200 came up
00:52:22.600 with it
00:52:22.940 is I
00:52:23.760 was in
00:52:24.040 the shower
00:52:24.420 and one
00:52:25.760 day all
00:52:26.280 of the
00:52:26.520 things I've
00:52:26.920 been thinking
00:52:27.380 about for
00:52:27.900 decades I
00:52:29.280 realized were
00:52:29.960 all connected
00:52:30.580 and that if I
00:52:32.580 put it in a
00:52:33.080 book it would
00:52:34.100 blow your
00:52:34.520 mind because
00:52:35.860 it was blowing
00:52:36.380 my mind
00:52:36.880 when I
00:52:37.140 thought about
00:52:37.520 it so I
00:52:39.060 thought well
00:52:39.580 if it's
00:52:40.140 blowing my
00:52:40.680 mind maybe
00:52:41.520 it'll blow
00:52:41.940 somebody else's
00:52:42.580 mind so I
00:52:43.320 put it in a
00:52:43.800 book and
00:52:45.340 when you
00:52:45.760 find out how
00:52:46.320 all these
00:52:46.760 things come
00:52:47.280 together you
00:52:48.720 might enjoy
00:52:49.260 it yeah
00:52:50.460 blew your
00:52:51.120 mind good
00:52:51.840 good it is
00:52:54.620 designed to
00:52:55.200 blow your
00:52:55.520 mind and
00:52:56.060 the the
00:52:58.000 context of
00:52:58.560 that is that
00:52:59.220 I used
00:52:59.680 hypnosis
00:53:00.300 technique in
00:53:01.540 the writing
00:53:01.940 if you use
00:53:04.280 hypnosis
00:53:04.720 technique in
00:53:05.400 the writing
00:53:05.780 you can get
00:53:07.080 some powerful
00:53:08.220 results so
00:53:09.220 that's what
00:53:09.540 I did
00:53:09.880 that's my
00:53:17.440 balcony that's
00:53:18.160 not a
00:53:18.440 fence
00:53:18.780 all right
00:53:23.780 2001 space
00:53:25.780 odyssey terrible
00:53:26.620 movie 2001
00:53:28.280 space odyssey is
00:53:29.200 one of the
00:53:29.500 all-time worst
00:53:30.080 movies I
00:53:32.140 would like to
00:53:32.700 reenact a
00:53:33.520 scene from
00:53:34.880 the movie
00:53:37.160 2001 space
00:53:38.580 odyssey now
00:53:39.300 don't get
00:53:39.740 bored don't
00:53:41.160 get bored
00:53:41.620 this is pretty
00:53:47.700 interesting so
00:53:48.380 far isn't it
00:53:49.260 don't you like
00:53:53.940 how the plot is
00:53:54.620 moving forward
00:53:55.320 wow look at
00:53:58.580 that ship
00:53:59.020 still
00:54:00.260 is anybody
00:54:03.160 going to talk
00:54:03.920 at this
00:54:04.200 fucking movie
00:54:04.960 when do we
00:54:08.340 stop looking at
00:54:09.140 this fucking
00:54:09.740 thing we've
00:54:10.460 looked at the
00:54:10.920 same fucking
00:54:11.540 thing now for
00:54:12.140 10 minutes
00:54:12.640 that's my
00:54:17.040 description of
00:54:18.580 2001
00:54:19.120 literally one of
00:54:20.280 the worst
00:54:20.540 movies ever
00:54:21.080 made
00:54:21.360 the other
00:54:24.680 worst movie
00:54:25.240 was
00:54:25.720 Titanic
00:54:27.660 if you
00:54:30.520 if you
00:54:30.940 recommend
00:54:31.300 somebody
00:54:31.800 watch
00:54:32.800 Titanic
00:54:33.280 you're an
00:54:33.660 asshole
00:54:33.980 because no
00:54:36.000 matter how
00:54:36.440 much you like
00:54:37.040 Titanic
00:54:37.500 it's way too
00:54:38.760 long and it
00:54:40.140 doesn't have a
00:54:40.740 good ending
00:54:41.220 and not only
00:54:42.200 does it not
00:54:42.760 have a good
00:54:43.240 ending it
00:54:43.780 has a it
00:54:44.320 has an ending
00:54:44.860 that will give
00:54:45.380 you PTSD
00:54:46.120 why are you
00:54:47.940 going to spend
00:54:48.320 three hours to
00:54:49.060 give yourself
00:54:49.520 a lifetime of
00:54:50.460 PTSD
00:54:50.920 dumb
00:54:52.520 don't do it
00:54:53.460 Titanic
00:54:54.000 terrible idea
00:54:55.320 for a movie
00:54:55.780 you know
00:54:57.120 what's worse
00:54:57.660 Schindler's
00:54:58.980 List
00:54:59.240 oh my
00:55:00.760 fucking god
00:55:01.560 Schindler's
00:55:03.220 List
00:55:03.500 there's a
00:55:04.100 specific scene
00:55:04.880 in there
00:55:05.160 and I'm
00:55:05.420 not going
00:55:05.660 to mention
00:55:05.940 it
00:55:06.180 that
00:55:07.140 traumatized
00:55:08.020 me for
00:55:08.400 years
00:55:09.180 and still
00:55:10.060 I was
00:55:10.600 actually
00:55:10.840 traumatized
00:55:11.640 now I
00:55:12.840 get that
00:55:13.460 we should
00:55:13.780 all know
00:55:14.060 how bad
00:55:14.440 it was
00:55:14.740 you know
00:55:15.500 you should
00:55:15.780 know the
00:55:16.820 holocaust
00:55:17.200 was bad
00:55:17.720 and making
00:55:18.840 it emotional
00:55:19.580 and bringing
00:55:20.020 you into
00:55:20.380 it definitely
00:55:20.820 has some
00:55:21.300 some utility
00:55:23.180 but don't
00:55:25.340 watch that
00:55:25.820 for entertainment
00:55:26.500 if you want
00:55:27.800 to give
00:55:28.020 yourself brain
00:55:28.740 damage
00:55:29.060 watch that
00:55:29.560 movie
00:55:29.860 I got
00:55:30.780 brain
00:55:31.080 damage
00:55:31.460 that's not
00:55:32.700 a joke
00:55:33.140 actual brain
00:55:34.640 damage
00:55:35.020 because it
00:55:36.080 created something
00:55:36.940 in my mind
00:55:37.520 that was unpleasant
00:55:38.300 and didn't go
00:55:39.040 away
00:55:39.360 if somebody
00:55:40.380 puts something
00:55:40.900 in your mind
00:55:41.340 that stays
00:55:41.860 there
00:55:42.180 it stays
00:55:43.180 unpleasant
00:55:43.660 and it never
00:55:44.220 goes away
00:55:44.640 that's brain
00:55:45.120 damage
00:55:45.500 I had a brain
00:55:46.740 that didn't
00:55:47.160 have that
00:55:47.620 and now it
00:55:48.080 does
00:55:48.340 it's brain
00:55:48.700 damage
00:55:49.040 that fucking
00:55:50.100 movie gave
00:55:50.600 me brain
00:55:50.960 damage
00:55:51.260 and that's
00:55:51.640 not
00:55:52.020 hyperbole
00:55:53.000 literal
00:55:54.160 fucking
00:55:54.700 brain
00:55:55.020 damage
00:55:55.420 and people
00:55:56.820 like give
00:55:57.400 it an award
00:55:57.960 why do you
00:55:59.300 give an award
00:55:59.880 to something
00:56:00.300 that gives
00:56:00.640 you brain
00:56:01.020 damage
00:56:01.380 come on
00:56:02.200 I mean
00:56:03.500 well I
00:56:04.180 know why
00:56:04.680 but
00:56:05.080 yeah serenity
00:56:07.960 is excellent
00:56:08.440 I agree
00:56:10.120 what about
00:56:12.440 Stephen King
00:56:13.140 the only thing
00:56:14.920 I can say
00:56:15.380 about Stephen
00:56:15.920 King
00:56:16.220 is that
00:56:16.600 when you
00:56:17.000 when you
00:56:18.280 see him
00:56:18.700 tweet
00:56:19.120 you wonder
00:56:20.660 how he
00:56:21.060 could write
00:56:21.380 a book
00:56:21.800 anybody else
00:56:25.220 have that
00:56:25.620 feeling
00:56:26.260 he tweets
00:56:28.500 like he's
00:56:29.020 somebody who
00:56:29.560 used to
00:56:30.020 know how
00:56:30.360 to write
00:56:30.640 a book
00:56:31.080 but something
00:56:32.360 terrible has
00:56:33.020 happened in
00:56:33.500 the meantime
00:56:33.880 like maybe
00:56:36.180 maybe drugs
00:56:37.440 some kind of
00:56:39.320 mental decline
00:56:40.080 of some type
00:56:40.920 because if he's
00:56:42.200 always been
00:56:42.660 like this
00:56:43.340 is that smart
00:56:45.220 enough to
00:56:45.580 write a book
00:56:46.080 I don't
00:56:47.400 know
00:56:47.740 it looks
00:56:48.800 like
00:56:49.100 see the
00:56:49.940 problem is
00:56:50.360 that even
00:56:50.780 his
00:56:51.040 criticisms
00:56:51.620 don't seem
00:56:52.300 smart
00:56:52.840 there are
00:56:54.600 lots of
00:56:54.900 people I
00:56:55.220 disagree
00:56:55.620 with
00:56:56.060 but they
00:56:57.160 don't look
00:56:57.560 actually
00:56:58.160 stupid
00:56:58.660 they look
00:56:59.940 like just
00:57:00.320 people who
00:57:01.120 you know
00:57:01.460 maybe they're
00:57:02.000 confused or
00:57:02.860 whatever
00:57:03.100 but they
00:57:03.840 don't look
00:57:04.140 stupid
00:57:04.600 you know
00:57:06.380 if Jake
00:57:07.720 Tamper says
00:57:08.360 something I
00:57:08.840 don't like
00:57:09.420 he never
00:57:10.520 sounds stupid
00:57:11.320 because he's
00:57:12.880 not
00:57:13.280 right
00:57:13.840 but Stephen
00:57:16.000 King actually
00:57:16.560 sounds stupid
00:57:17.360 when he
00:57:17.740 tweets
00:57:18.100 maybe he's
00:57:20.140 just a bad
00:57:20.580 tweeter
00:57:20.920 but it's
00:57:21.660 hard for me
00:57:22.140 to reconcile
00:57:22.780 the tweeting
00:57:23.440 with the fact
00:57:24.500 that he wrote
00:57:24.960 all these
00:57:25.340 popular books
00:57:26.380 maybe Joshua
00:57:31.520 Lysak
00:57:32.000 could explain
00:57:32.820 it to us
00:57:33.580 because I
00:57:36.440 already know
00:57:36.800 the answer
00:57:37.280 but maybe
00:57:38.640 Joshua can
00:57:39.540 explain that
00:57:40.060 to you
00:57:40.400 why is it
00:57:41.980 he's writing
00:57:42.660 all these
00:57:43.020 good books
00:57:43.660 still
00:57:44.580 and yet
00:57:45.060 he seems
00:57:45.500 like he
00:57:46.080 couldn't be
00:57:46.480 capable of
00:57:47.000 that
00:57:47.180 what could
00:57:50.100 possibly be
00:57:50.700 the explanation
00:57:51.280 for that
00:57:51.680 that's one
00:57:53.960 explanation
00:57:54.460 I don't know
00:57:55.720 if it's the
00:57:56.080 only explanation
00:57:56.800 but it's
00:57:57.300 certainly one
00:57:57.900 of them
00:57:58.500 yeah
00:58:01.980 alright
00:58:02.580 that's enough
00:58:03.540 for now
00:58:03.920 no I don't
00:58:05.100 have monkey
00:58:05.500 pox
00:58:05.860 I burned
00:58:06.520 my lip
00:58:07.000 I hope
00:58:08.520 that's the
00:58:08.840 last time
00:58:09.160 I have to
00:58:09.480 say that
00:58:09.820 today
00:58:10.160 and I'll
00:58:11.540 talk to you
00:58:12.060 tomorrow
00:58:12.820 what do I
00:58:13.240 do it
00:58:15.400 soon