Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 09, 2022


Episode 1830 Scott Adams： FBI Raids Trumps Mar-a-Lago Home And That Means Trouble...For Everyone


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

137.27394

Word Count

8,246

Sentence Count

653

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

14


Summary

Trump's Mar-a-Lago home is raided by the FBI at 4:00am, and Scott Adams is here to explain why. Plus, Scott explains why he thinks the FBI is trying to protect itself from Trump.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:11.600 Was there any news yesterday? Yes, there was. There was.
00:00:16.740 And you came to the right place, because everybody else is talking about it all wrong.
00:00:22.500 But we're going to do it right.
00:00:23.760 And all you need to enjoy this experience is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice,
00:00:30.920 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:33.920 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:37.340 I like coffee.
00:00:39.040 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:44.260 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:47.080 It's called a simultaneous sip.
00:00:49.740 And it happens now. Go!
00:00:53.760 Ah, tastes like freedom.
00:01:01.220 Let's keep that alive.
00:01:05.360 Well, we'll get to the big story, of course.
00:01:08.240 But I just had to make this announcement
00:01:10.920 that I'm going to start blocking anybody who tries to vax-splain to me.
00:01:18.840 Here's what you get blocked for.
00:01:20.420 Scott, don't you know that the vaccinations that you call shots are not really vaccinations
00:01:28.500 because they don't prevent you from getting it?
00:01:31.840 Blocked.
00:01:33.040 You're right.
00:01:34.680 But how many times do you have to tell me what everybody knows?
00:01:38.220 If you just tell me the same thing everybody knows,
00:01:41.840 do you assume I'm the last person in the world to find out that the vaccinations,
00:01:45.800 so-called, don't actually block transmission?
00:01:48.840 No, no, I actually know it.
00:01:51.980 And every time you mention it again, I'm going to block you.
00:01:55.800 Please don't do it.
00:01:57.340 Just please stop saying it.
00:01:58.800 It's the soil and green of the pandemic.
00:02:03.300 All right, well, I don't know if you heard, but Trump's Mar-a-Lago home got raided by the FBI.
00:02:09.380 Don't call it a raid, the Democrats say.
00:02:12.940 It's no raid.
00:02:14.640 It's just people showing up unexpectedly at 4 a.m. with guns and asking for access to your house.
00:02:20.240 But not a raid.
00:02:21.780 No, no, no, no.
00:02:22.680 It's serving a warrant.
00:02:24.760 The Democrats would have you believe.
00:02:26.440 There's nothing raid-like about that whatsoever.
00:02:30.560 Just the legal process working exactly the way it's supposed to.
00:02:33.920 My take is that Trump just won the black vote for 2024 because every time he seems unfairly targeted by law enforcement,
00:02:45.980 I feel like there's a little bell that rings inside the head of everybody who feels like maybe they have also been unfairly targeted by law enforcement.
00:02:56.560 If you're going to bond over something, bonding over being unfairly treated by law enforcement is a real good way to go.
00:03:09.140 The best part about this is that Trump backed prison reform.
00:03:16.620 Trump worked hard and sacrificed quite a bit of his political capital, I would argue,
00:03:22.200 to get a lot of black people out of jail sooner than they would have.
00:03:27.260 Now, it wasn't just for black people, of course, but since they're disproportionately affected by the justice system.
00:03:34.560 So here is Trump, who, to his credit, I would say, because I was in favor of it,
00:03:41.140 did a great deal to reduce the amount of jail time that black people were experiencing in the United States.
00:03:48.240 And now he has, it looks like, we don't know what the justification is yet.
00:03:55.240 We may be surprised.
00:03:56.940 Maybe they have something.
00:03:58.780 Maybe this time the walls really are closing in on Trump.
00:04:01.980 Maybe it's really worse than Watergate for the first time.
00:04:05.640 Maybe.
00:04:06.780 Maybe.
00:04:07.680 Anything's possible.
00:04:08.920 But I think if you look at it, it kind of looks like they don't have anything.
00:04:13.060 Because I feel like we would have heard about it.
00:04:16.140 If it were anything big.
00:04:18.240 But, yeah, so certainly the voters are going to have some reaction to this,
00:04:25.340 but there's more to learn.
00:04:28.520 Because I think our opinion won't be finalized until we find out what the warrant is about.
00:04:38.280 Does it feel to you that...
00:04:40.420 Let me just tell you how it feels.
00:04:42.060 So the next is just literally just how it feels.
00:04:47.160 So there's no factual basis to the next thing I'm going to say.
00:04:52.380 It feels like the FBI is protecting itself from Trump.
00:04:58.080 Am I wrong?
00:04:59.880 It feels like they're protecting themselves.
00:05:01.760 It doesn't feel like this was for the country.
00:05:03.480 Because I can't think of anything that I felt threatened by
00:05:07.660 by knowing that the president who has full clearance for any kind of information,
00:05:15.200 an ex-president who has complete security clearance,
00:05:18.340 if somebody with complete security clearance has some documents
00:05:21.880 that probably we have copies of,
00:05:25.100 let me ask you this.
00:05:28.960 How many documents make it into the White House
00:05:31.360 that are not digitally recorded before they're handed to the president?
00:05:36.920 Do they only record it after the president touches it?
00:05:40.640 And then what happens to it when he's done?
00:05:42.260 He sets it on the desk or whatever.
00:05:44.460 Does somebody just say,
00:05:45.340 well, there's a document we don't have to do anything with?
00:05:48.940 Or do they just scan everything?
00:05:52.880 Don't you assume it all exists in a scanned form?
00:05:57.100 What kind of documents exactly is he taking home
00:05:59.660 from the White House
00:06:01.480 that are not recorded in some form in another place?
00:06:07.120 I guess I have some questions about the process.
00:06:09.700 Well, to me, it looks like the FBI is trying to avoid Trump
00:06:16.140 looking into their own behavior.
00:06:18.580 It's what it feels like.
00:06:20.180 I have no proof of that.
00:06:22.340 Can't read any minds.
00:06:23.840 But it feels like it.
00:06:25.100 As a citizen of the United States,
00:06:27.140 it's just how it makes me feel.
00:06:28.600 It makes me more likely to want to vote.
00:06:31.560 And I don't vote.
00:06:33.300 That's a long story.
00:06:34.480 You know why.
00:06:35.880 But this makes even me want to vote.
00:06:38.040 And that's a pretty high bar.
00:06:41.020 But again, we're reacting on incomplete information.
00:06:46.580 Now, what the Democrats are trying to sell us,
00:06:50.780 and even David Axelrod came at us with this.
00:06:56.900 So this is a David Axelrod tweet.
00:06:59.220 And because it came from him,
00:07:01.140 it means a little bit more.
00:07:02.340 I'll tell you why.
00:07:03.480 He tweeted,
00:07:04.120 One thing is very clear.
00:07:05.780 However, Garland, the Attorney General,
00:07:08.620 Garland would not have authorized this raid,
00:07:11.300 and no federal judge would have signed off on it
00:07:13.880 if there weren't significant evidence to warrant it.
00:07:18.460 To which I say,
00:07:20.200 What?
00:07:21.160 What kind of a country do we live in
00:07:24.280 that anybody would even say this in public?
00:07:28.580 Have we not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt
00:07:31.220 that the FBI would, in fact,
00:07:34.240 falsify information to the court?
00:07:38.720 We don't have to wonder if that's true.
00:07:41.940 Somebody's going to jail for it, right?
00:07:44.140 Or has pled guilty to it.
00:07:46.040 We have a guilty plea
00:07:47.040 that this exact behavior,
00:07:50.680 faking a reason for action,
00:07:54.900 and in the same domain.
00:07:56.600 It's not even a different domain.
00:07:58.140 It's Trump.
00:07:58.840 So we know that they will falsify information
00:08:02.640 to make Trump look bad.
00:08:05.100 The very organization,
00:08:07.220 oh, let's say the Department of Justice plus the FBI,
00:08:10.320 I'm going to lump them together for this conversation.
00:08:15.540 But here's what's interesting.
00:08:17.620 In my opinion,
00:08:19.000 Axelrod is one of the Democrats
00:08:22.000 who's least likely to directly lie to you.
00:08:25.660 Now, of course, he's, you know,
00:08:28.060 on Team Democrat, solidly.
00:08:30.080 So he's going to give you the Democrat spin on everything.
00:08:33.520 But I can't think of a time when he's lied directly.
00:08:37.620 He's one of the higher credibility Democrats
00:08:40.600 who, you know, sells his point of view,
00:08:43.420 and you know it's a point of view.
00:08:46.260 Do you have evidence of something he did
00:08:48.880 that was as bad as this tweet?
00:08:51.700 And so he's sort of like an indicator for me.
00:08:57.320 There's some people on the political left
00:08:59.980 who have more credibility than others.
00:09:03.500 And I think he has more credibility
00:09:05.080 than most of the people on the left
00:09:06.960 because he's more transparent about being on a team
00:09:09.740 and he says things that don't sound that crazy.
00:09:13.340 So to me, that's pretty credible.
00:09:15.180 You know, fully transparent.
00:09:16.460 I'm on this team.
00:09:18.040 Here's my opinion.
00:09:19.300 Okay, I get that.
00:09:20.100 But this seems to be a departure
00:09:23.580 from what I have noticed of his pattern.
00:09:27.500 Now, that's only based on what I've noticed,
00:09:29.160 so there's a gap in that.
00:09:31.560 But it feels like he's completely bought off
00:09:35.840 on selling this perspective that's clearly ridiculous.
00:09:43.720 This is the first time I've seen him try to sell
00:09:46.340 a perspective that's obviously and clearly ridiculous.
00:09:49.820 Now, if you're going to respond to something
00:09:53.860 that's obviously and clearly ridiculous,
00:09:56.300 what is the persuasion method most effective?
00:10:01.700 What would be the persuasion technique,
00:10:04.620 which I've taught you many times by different...
00:10:07.580 Well, mocking.
00:10:08.660 Mocking is good.
00:10:09.520 But I think mocking has lost a lot of its importance.
00:10:15.640 Mocking in the political field doesn't really work.
00:10:19.820 Mocking in the corporate world works really well.
00:10:23.100 Let me make that distinction.
00:10:24.320 That's important.
00:10:25.720 Mockery is brutally effective in the corporate world.
00:10:30.160 Brutally effective.
00:10:31.740 Nobody wants to get mocked in the corporate world.
00:10:34.300 In politics, it's just the atmosphere.
00:10:38.040 I mean, mocking each other is literally all that's going on.
00:10:42.020 There's nothing but it.
00:10:43.100 So it doesn't really have any power in politics.
00:10:45.600 So I would say that responding to a ridiculous point of view
00:10:48.940 with mockery just doesn't work in politics.
00:10:52.880 It's fun.
00:10:53.860 I do it all the time.
00:10:55.380 It could be entertaining for your base,
00:10:57.120 but there's no persuasion element to it.
00:11:02.340 Agree and amplify?
00:11:03.440 No.
00:11:06.120 No, there's a cleaner way.
00:11:07.740 It's called the high ground.
00:11:10.700 So here's my response to the David Axelrod tweet.
00:11:14.540 He got tens of thousands of responses,
00:11:17.080 so he's not going to see mine.
00:11:18.820 But here's the high ground approach.
00:11:23.940 So when he says there must be significant evidence
00:11:28.140 to validate the warrant,
00:11:30.960 I say this.
00:11:32.100 I said this point by David Axelrod might have been valid 10 years ago.
00:11:38.360 Today, anyone not zombified by fake news assumes an FBI raid on a Republican
00:11:43.380 is probably illegitimate,
00:11:45.840 because the pattern is hard to miss.
00:11:47.920 That's the high ground.
00:11:50.660 The high ground is, well, you're absolutely right 10 years ago.
00:11:56.840 If I just said everything you're saying is ridiculous,
00:12:00.240 that just sounds like somebody disagreeing, just to disagree.
00:12:04.060 But if you say your point of view was absolutely valid 10 years ago,
00:12:08.840 but it ignores our recent history in which the FBI has shown that they can't be trusted
00:12:13.600 on exactly this question of, do you have a good reason to act?
00:12:17.900 This exact question has been, you know, proven to us publicly and without any doubt,
00:12:24.160 this is something we have to worry about.
00:12:26.980 So the fact that David Axelrod would live through the last several years
00:12:30.540 and would say without any hedging that if the FBI is acting on a warrant,
00:12:37.200 there must be significant evidence for it.
00:12:40.840 And everything suggests that that's just not true.
00:12:44.400 Now, if I just said, well, you're full of shit and you're lying,
00:12:47.840 that has no effect.
00:12:49.880 But if you say, yeah, you were right 10 years ago, that's the way it used to be.
00:12:54.900 You've really accepted the point of view, but you've infantilized them at the same time.
00:13:00.800 So that's basically what I did with his point of view.
00:13:04.660 I infantilized it.
00:13:05.940 I basically said, well, you know, you were right as far as you went,
00:13:11.140 but the adults can go a little bit further, right?
00:13:15.080 The children can say, yes, warrants need good reasons.
00:13:19.520 That's a child's point of view.
00:13:21.400 An adult's point of view is, well, not lately.
00:13:24.720 You know, lately the pattern has been very clear and established by the courts,
00:13:29.380 or at least a legal system, because we do have somebody admitting to it, right?
00:13:34.000 There's a confession.
00:13:35.940 So that's pretty clear.
00:13:38.460 All right.
00:13:39.080 So we're going to find out today how many Americans have not heard of the Russia collusion hoax.
00:13:50.720 There are actually people who don't know that the Russia collusion thing was a hoax,
00:13:55.140 and they're weighing in on social media.
00:13:58.140 They literally don't know that that was a hoax.
00:14:00.360 They actually think, and they believe that because, what's his name, Manafort.
00:14:07.200 The Democrats have believed that because Manafort is known to have shared some internal polling information with one Russian,
00:14:17.480 for money, I guess, that therefore Russia collusion was proved.
00:14:23.360 Now, has anybody asked the question, how much national security value was internal polling information?
00:14:33.880 How in the world was that valuable, internal polling information?
00:14:42.880 Really?
00:14:43.560 What was in that internal polling information?
00:14:48.260 Wouldn't you like to know?
00:14:49.840 What do you suppose Manafort told a Russian that was useful?
00:14:54.780 That actually the Russian said, oh, it's a good thing I know that from your internal polling.
00:14:59.640 I can't even imagine anything that would have been useful.
00:15:05.800 Can you?
00:15:07.360 Like, what would be an example?
00:15:09.240 Give me any example.
00:15:10.380 Even just make one up.
00:15:11.520 Speculate.
00:15:12.780 Speculate.
00:15:13.420 What could be possibly an internal polling information that would make a difference to international security or anything?
00:15:22.760 Nothing.
00:15:23.280 The best case scenario is it might have been a heads up about, oh, you know, maybe who's going to win or something.
00:15:30.480 I don't know.
00:15:31.460 Something like that.
00:15:32.800 But even that would be sketchy.
00:15:34.640 I mean, internal polling is not exactly the most reliable stuff.
00:15:40.940 All right.
00:15:41.860 So nobody's going to ask the question, what did Manafort actually share?
00:15:47.700 Because if I were Manafort, I would have done the following.
00:15:50.600 I would have found something I could give to this Russian who would pay me money or return a favor or something later.
00:15:58.760 But I'd make sure it didn't hurt the country.
00:16:01.800 Because I'm pretty sure Manafort didn't want to hurt America.
00:16:05.460 He just wanted to make a buck.
00:16:07.680 I assume.
00:16:09.060 Because he wasn't really trying very hard to hurt America.
00:16:11.700 I didn't see any evidence of that.
00:16:13.420 Just trying to make a buck.
00:16:14.400 And I'd love to know what he thought was useful to them, but also not harmful to America.
00:16:21.500 Because that's probably what he gave them.
00:16:23.400 Just speculated.
00:16:25.640 All right.
00:16:30.760 So, God, there's so much going on about this one story.
00:16:35.100 So, Jerry Nadler, when he retweeted a New York Times headline that said Trump's Mar-a-Lago had been raided.
00:16:48.520 And Jerry Nadler responded with one word.
00:16:52.060 Good!
00:16:53.200 Exclamation mark.
00:16:54.020 Now, I understand that, you know, he's politically on a different side.
00:17:03.320 But doesn't that feel too far?
00:17:06.480 It feels too far, doesn't it?
00:17:08.380 Because as far as I know, there's not even an alleged crime.
00:17:12.180 Not even an alleged crime that would go to this level.
00:17:17.680 In other words, if it's really just some documents, you would not expect a raid.
00:17:22.520 So, what is he saying good to?
00:17:26.020 What part is good?
00:17:27.320 The fact that America doesn't know why the FBI, which has no credibility, just raided a political enemy of the current administration?
00:17:36.820 How in the world is this good?
00:17:39.060 In what world can you say in public that this is good?
00:17:42.840 Even if you thought Trump had been guilty of a crime, is this good?
00:17:47.960 And so, I would like to put a stake in the ground.
00:17:54.420 When Jerry Nadler dies of natural causes, which I'm guessing could be within the week.
00:17:59.860 I mean, if you just take a look at him, he looks like he's going to go any minute.
00:18:03.580 But when Jerry Nadler dies, I'm assuming I'm going to outlive him.
00:18:07.720 I don't know.
00:18:08.480 Maybe not.
00:18:09.380 But I'm going to make that assumption.
00:18:10.960 I'm going to outlive him.
00:18:11.780 I'm just going to tweet one word.
00:18:14.980 Good.
00:18:16.060 With exclamation.
00:18:17.000 Good.
00:18:18.140 Because I think he's proven that he's not, he's really not on Team America here.
00:18:24.480 Whatever team he's on, it's not my country.
00:18:27.520 Because in my country, if Biden's home got raided, and I didn't have an alleged crime
00:18:36.300 that I was even aware of, I would say, fuck that.
00:18:41.060 I don't care what team Biden's on.
00:18:44.140 If you send the FBI to raid him and you don't tell me why, just, you know, I hate to do this,
00:18:50.540 but sometimes you have to.
00:18:53.060 Just imagine the reverse.
00:18:54.440 Imagine Trump in office and having him investigate Biden, but let's say there was no Biden laptop.
00:19:02.640 There was nothing like that.
00:19:03.580 There was no actual specific crime.
00:19:06.360 Imagine that.
00:19:07.760 Would you be in favor of that?
00:19:10.600 Hell no.
00:19:12.220 Hell no.
00:19:13.460 If Trump had done this to Biden with, you know, equally sketchy reasons, let's say Biden
00:19:19.560 had some documents that were, you know, in question.
00:19:23.040 Let's say it's the same situation.
00:19:25.600 Hell no.
00:19:27.380 Hell no.
00:19:28.280 I would not support Trump doing that or the Trump administration doing that.
00:19:32.000 No, no, no, no.
00:19:33.840 Now, I suppose it's easy for me to say that because I'm not in that situation.
00:19:39.000 But I feel like I know myself well enough that there's no situation in which I'd be okay with
00:19:45.260 this.
00:19:45.520 Because it's the ex-president thing, right?
00:19:49.360 Even if I thought Biden had done something sketchy, I still wouldn't be in favor of it.
00:19:54.080 Because that whole don't go after your political enemies, that's a tradition that we kind of
00:20:02.140 need to keep.
00:20:04.020 Right?
00:20:04.260 Kind of need to keep that one.
00:20:05.500 And I get the whole argument of, well, it really depends how bad the accusation is that's in
00:20:13.180 the warrant that we haven't seen yet.
00:20:15.720 Well, okay.
00:20:17.420 If it turns out that there was a hostage situation at Mar-a-Lago, and the hostage was in some kind
00:20:26.700 of a container with limited air, and the oxygen was running out, and there was no time to delay,
00:20:34.980 well, yeah.
00:20:35.940 Execute the warrant, even if you're not quite sure.
00:20:38.760 Sure.
00:20:39.680 Sure.
00:20:39.940 But are we going to find out that whatever the reason that's listed on the warrant, is
00:20:46.760 that going to sound to you like a hostage running out of oxygen?
00:20:52.820 Do you think you're going to feel the urgency when you find out what this is?
00:20:56.880 I feel like the urgency might be missing.
00:21:00.100 Because these documents have been there a long time.
00:21:03.280 Now, here's the other funny part about it.
00:21:05.380 For the Democrats' point of view to be valid, you would have to accept the following.
00:21:11.720 And by the way, this is a really good persuasion tip.
00:21:15.660 And the tip goes into the category, in order to believe X, you must also believe these following
00:21:22.740 things, because they're necessary to support your belief.
00:21:26.680 All right.
00:21:27.240 So in order to believe that there's something incriminating in the documents, here's what
00:21:33.380 you'd have to believe.
00:21:34.240 That Trump took incriminating documents that everybody would expect to be incriminating,
00:21:41.980 because, you know, he took them.
00:21:44.040 He would store them where lots of people knew where they were, because obviously people at
00:21:48.120 Mar-a-Lago would know where they were stored.
00:21:51.260 And that he would have them stored in a building that's full of, and I don't know if you know
00:21:57.220 this, but Mar-a-Lago was built in the era in which they have toilets.
00:22:04.240 There are toilets all over that place.
00:22:07.000 I'm pretty sure that Trump has a toilet.
00:22:10.020 Probably the guests have at least one to share.
00:22:13.560 No, they probably have their own toilets, I'll bet you.
00:22:15.640 I'll bet you that place is just filled with toilets.
00:22:18.600 So here you have your incriminating information on pieces of paper, sitting in a building with a guy who the Democrats say would never want anybody to see what's in those documents.
00:22:33.700 And then they're sitting next to probably 25 toilets.
00:22:38.600 And we have evidence, photographic evidence, that Trump has allegedly torn up documents and put them in a toilet, because we actually saw the photos of actual documents in a toilet.
00:22:49.800 Now, do you think that Trump could have put all these things together and said, documents that would be highly incriminating to me, but I've got possession of them, I'll store them here next to my 25 toilets.
00:23:05.880 If only there were a way to get rid of the incriminating information.
00:23:11.160 If only I could come up with some way.
00:23:14.980 So that's the Democrat point of view.
00:23:18.360 The Democrat point of view is, number one, the FBI would never raid somebody on a warrant unless they had really good evidence.
00:23:30.660 That's ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous.
00:23:33.880 In 2022, that's ridiculous. Of course they would.
00:23:36.660 Because there's nothing they wouldn't do based on their recent history.
00:23:40.880 Once you understand the Russia collusion hoax, once you understand what they did, that's known.
00:23:48.940 That part is known. We're not guessing.
00:23:52.340 Once you understand that, all bets are off.
00:23:55.320 Because what exactly was worse than trying to depose or change the course of American history by making up a crime?
00:24:03.880 There's nothing worse than that.
00:24:06.240 There's nothing worse than that.
00:24:08.260 Whatever this is, is not worse than that.
00:24:12.240 It's just bad.
00:24:13.760 Not worse than that.
00:24:14.700 I'm just going to throw this story in the middle, then we'll get back to it.
00:24:26.360 So Israel and Gaza have reached a ceasefire.
00:24:30.120 And I would like to congratulate both Israel and Gaza for getting everything that they wanted out of this recent flare-up.
00:24:38.280 And I say that because the government of Israel kind of needs to have an active enemy.
00:24:45.920 Every time somebody attacks Israel, Israel gets stronger.
00:24:49.640 You know, they take a little more land.
00:24:51.800 They, you know, have to take a high ground to defend themselves, maybe keep it.
00:24:56.140 You know what I mean?
00:24:57.020 So Israel sort of needs a permanent enemy.
00:24:59.820 But the best case scenario is that it's a low-grade conflict.
00:25:04.560 And they needed to flare-up now and then to remind you.
00:25:09.220 And then they needed to go back down.
00:25:12.100 Likewise, the folks in Gaza who were firing the missiles and stuff,
00:25:17.660 they also need a flare-up of violence every now and then,
00:25:21.900 because that's how they get more funding from their sponsors.
00:25:26.140 And so this was just theater.
00:25:28.440 You know, nobody in Gaza thought they were going to conquer Israel.
00:25:31.800 Am I right?
00:25:32.300 Nobody in Gaza thought they were going to conquer Israel.
00:25:35.960 But here's the other question.
00:25:37.980 Do you think Israel couldn't completely stop this from happening if they wanted to?
00:25:42.380 Of course they could.
00:25:43.760 But it would require far more brutality than they could handle, right, reputationally.
00:25:49.300 So the very best situation is that this type of attack flares up.
00:25:55.660 It killed 43 people this time, including 15 children.
00:25:59.960 I don't know on which side.
00:26:03.440 It doesn't mention whose side they were on.
00:26:05.820 But from Israel's point of view, that was an acceptable loss,
00:26:09.400 especially since it's not all on their side.
00:26:12.720 And from the Gazans' point of view, I think it was an acceptable loss,
00:26:16.620 because they got everything they needed out of it.
00:26:19.220 I'm not even sure this needs to be news anymore.
00:26:24.680 Like, it's a weird kind of news where it's just two sides getting exactly what they want
00:26:28.980 and then going back to the status quo to wait until the next flare-up.
00:26:33.820 It's just theater.
00:26:34.680 I wouldn't even bother trying to fix that.
00:26:43.600 So, how angry are you about the Mar-a-Lago raid?
00:26:52.000 Tell me your feeling.
00:26:55.660 Did it immediately make you want to go all January 6th on this situation?
00:27:01.200 So, here's the thing I'm going to warn you about.
00:27:06.540 Don't overreact.
00:27:08.860 Don't overreact.
00:27:10.840 Because you know there's some militia right now that just got their marching orders, right?
00:27:17.040 Somewhere there's a right-leaning militia that Trump will get tagged with,
00:27:22.700 even though he doesn't even know the names, probably.
00:27:25.380 And they're firing up right now,
00:27:27.280 and they're going to use this as their justification for marching or whatever.
00:27:31.380 Now, I don't think they're going to start shooting.
00:27:33.920 I think they're just going to make another show of, you know, a show of here we are.
00:27:38.380 And then the Democrats will run that,
00:27:41.920 and they'll say not only is Trump obviously a criminal, they will say,
00:27:47.720 because look at this warrant, which we have no details about.
00:27:51.240 Well, clearly it must be a valid warrant,
00:27:54.220 because nobody would do an invalid warrant just because they have done it recently,
00:27:59.520 right in front of us.
00:28:00.860 Nobody would do that.
00:28:03.660 So, it looks like a setup.
00:28:08.840 It feels like a setup.
00:28:10.540 So, I would worry that the Democrats, at least part of the strategy,
00:28:14.820 would be to provoke an overreaction.
00:28:16.980 Because, remember, the January 6th thing completely fell apart.
00:28:21.460 They were trying to show that the Republicans are a bunch of, you know,
00:28:25.240 armed, dangerous insurrectionists,
00:28:27.760 and the entire January 6th thing just dissolved in sunlight.
00:28:32.680 In fact, the Harvard-sponsored survey
00:28:37.220 showed that the vast majority of the people attended
00:28:40.300 thought they were saving the republic.
00:28:42.580 They didn't think it was an insurrection.
00:28:44.000 They thought they were saving it from an insurrection.
00:28:46.980 That's all of evidence now.
00:28:48.860 Now we know what the crowd thought.
00:28:50.940 They were not there for an insurrection.
00:28:52.580 Most of them.
00:28:53.260 Some of them were, but, you know,
00:28:55.000 any big crowd is going to have some minority opinion in it.
00:29:00.040 And then we saw all the evidence,
00:29:01.560 and the evidence didn't seem damning of Trump at all,
00:29:04.700 you know, at least in a criminal sense.
00:29:06.560 And now, coincidentally, we get this.
00:29:12.820 Imagine what would happen if all the militias show up
00:29:16.880 and they start looking dangerous again.
00:29:20.040 Don't get suckered into this.
00:29:22.080 You know, if you know anybody in the militia,
00:29:24.680 I'm sure there's somebody in the militia who's watching this.
00:29:26.820 There's got to be at least one.
00:29:27.720 So, be a little more strategic.
00:29:32.220 Whatever your militia, you know, long-term objectives are,
00:29:37.260 I'm not saying they're good.
00:29:38.460 I'm not saying they're bad.
00:29:39.340 I don't know.
00:29:40.280 I have no idea what they are.
00:29:41.700 Probably lots of different ones.
00:29:44.800 But just be cool for a little bit.
00:29:46.880 Just be cool for a little bit.
00:29:48.160 Because you don't want to make a big show
00:29:50.820 that's exactly what they want.
00:29:53.640 So, just wait.
00:29:56.760 Now, what do you think they're actually going to come up with
00:30:00.660 as their explanation for the warrant?
00:30:04.240 And by the way, do we ever find out?
00:30:07.420 How does the process work?
00:30:10.200 Because at some point,
00:30:12.080 Trump himself has to find out what it's about, right?
00:30:14.580 Is that not part of the process?
00:30:18.740 The person who's targeted has to hear what the charge is.
00:30:23.180 Am I wrong?
00:30:26.980 The warrant should say.
00:30:28.820 And when the warrant is served,
00:30:30.540 somebody reads it, right?
00:30:31.960 On the receiving end.
00:30:33.220 So, are you...
00:30:34.380 Okay, now I have a big question.
00:30:36.480 Are you telling me that somebody at Mar-a-Lago
00:30:38.640 got a search warrant and read it
00:30:42.320 and it said why they were there
00:30:45.120 and we don't know that yet?
00:30:48.660 Really?
00:30:49.660 There's somebody at Mar-a-Lago
00:30:50.860 who actually read the warrant
00:30:52.260 because they had to let him in, right?
00:30:54.960 It's a sealed warrant, somebody says.
00:30:58.980 It would be initially sealed.
00:31:00.520 So, are you telling me that the FBI can come to your house?
00:31:04.220 I guess you are telling me this.
00:31:05.800 And they can say,
00:31:07.100 I have a secret document you can't see
00:31:09.060 that says I can search your house
00:31:10.820 and you're not even accused of a crime.
00:31:13.360 That's actually the process.
00:31:18.160 Seriously?
00:31:21.360 Seriously?
00:31:26.680 I'm not going to take that as a fact.
00:31:30.340 I feel like there must be some nuance on that.
00:31:32.800 There's enough people saying no.
00:31:35.640 A no-knock warrant.
00:31:36.920 Yeah, they did have no-knock warrants,
00:31:39.780 so that would suggest that it was legal at one point.
00:31:43.740 But the no-knock part had more to do with avoiding violence.
00:31:46.920 That's sort of a different situation.
00:31:49.240 The warrant has to be served.
00:31:50.860 But how can it be sealed and served?
00:31:56.080 Does that mean...
00:31:57.640 Are you telling me that the target of the warrant
00:31:59.380 is not told why they're searching?
00:32:02.540 Literally.
00:32:04.160 The indictment is sealed, not the warrant.
00:32:06.080 Okay, that makes more sense.
00:32:07.680 I feel like we're all bad lawyers trying to figure this out.
00:32:11.440 If anybody here is actually an attorney,
00:32:15.280 could you put that in your comment?
00:32:16.900 You know, like,
00:32:18.040 I'm a lawyer, comma.
00:32:21.260 Here's what's true.
00:32:23.200 That would help a lot.
00:32:25.120 Because the rest of us are just guessing.
00:32:28.280 They don't have to show you the details until later.
00:32:32.140 So somebody is saying they can say,
00:32:34.360 we're here for these documents, for example,
00:32:37.420 but they don't have to say,
00:32:39.000 because the documents might say X, Y, or Z.
00:32:43.060 Yeah, well, let's watch Barnes and Fry talk about this.
00:32:48.360 They'll be better.
00:32:50.860 The warrant, oh, the lawyer says,
00:32:52.720 the warrant describes the premises to be searched.
00:32:54.980 Okay, thank you.
00:32:56.800 So from an actual lawyer,
00:32:58.520 the warrant describes the premise.
00:33:00.860 It doesn't describe the crime or alleged crime.
00:33:04.700 Now, I guess you could have a warrant to search somebody
00:33:09.260 who's not accused of a crime, correct?
00:33:13.200 Because you could be searching a confederate's house
00:33:15.680 or a family member's house.
00:33:17.720 So you don't have to be accused of a crime
00:33:19.760 to be served the warrant.
00:33:22.640 Okay.
00:33:22.900 So that does suggest that the person
00:33:25.440 whose home is being searched
00:33:26.900 doesn't have to know the topic.
00:33:28.840 They just have to know that the warrant
00:33:30.640 describes what will be searched.
00:33:34.800 That sounds right.
00:33:36.260 I'm going to act like that's right
00:33:37.640 because it sounds right.
00:33:38.620 They search for evidence
00:33:43.560 so they can accuse you of crime, right?
00:33:45.260 But they have to have some reason
00:33:46.620 to suspect there's something there.
00:33:50.780 Where was Melania?
00:33:52.240 I don't know.
00:33:52.820 That's a good question.
00:33:53.960 Yeah, was Melania with Trump?
00:33:56.000 Why didn't they report that?
00:33:57.100 Now, as Jack Posobiec reminds us on Twitter,
00:34:03.380 the big risk here is if Trump is,
00:34:07.480 I don't know if indicted is enough,
00:34:09.400 but if he's found guilty
00:34:10.780 of doing some kind of a document of destruction crime,
00:34:15.240 he would be ineligible to hold office.
00:34:18.360 And it looks like that might be the play.
00:34:21.200 But they don't have to get that exactly.
00:34:23.200 They can just smear him until Election Day.
00:34:27.100 Yeah.
00:34:32.760 All right.
00:34:38.120 Where were the security people?
00:34:41.260 Yeah.
00:34:42.560 Now, the security people presumably
00:34:45.640 looked at the warrant
00:34:47.500 or listened to somebody who looked at the warrant
00:34:50.340 and decided that they would step aside.
00:34:53.200 But it does make you wonder
00:34:56.440 what their job description is.
00:35:02.020 All right.
00:35:03.840 This is going to drag out for years.
00:35:06.680 So do you think that the real play
00:35:08.420 is just to put Trump in legal jeopardy
00:35:11.900 at the same time he's trying to run for re-election?
00:35:14.840 Is it called re-election
00:35:18.700 if there's a term in between years?
00:35:27.900 Yeah, it's creating some friction.
00:35:29.640 Exactly.
00:35:31.100 Well,
00:35:32.460 does it seem to you
00:35:35.420 that this would backfire?
00:35:37.420 If you were a Democrat,
00:35:39.780 would you think that
00:35:40.900 indicting Trump
00:35:42.640 would make people
00:35:44.300 less likely to vote for you?
00:35:48.020 I don't think so.
00:35:50.880 I think that Republicans
00:35:52.680 would be more likely.
00:35:54.480 Because remember,
00:35:55.200 Republicans just watched
00:35:56.200 the whole January 6th thing play out.
00:35:58.460 And to Republicans,
00:35:59.460 it looked like people
00:36:00.840 who look like them
00:36:01.920 and think like them
00:36:03.640 were being rounded up and jailed.
00:36:05.380 And now the leader
00:36:07.060 of the people
00:36:07.720 who look like them
00:36:08.520 and think like them
00:36:09.360 looks like he's being targeted,
00:36:12.100 they would say, unfairly.
00:36:14.840 I feel like,
00:36:16.240 I feel like this would
00:36:18.220 vastly increase
00:36:21.100 the number of people who voted.
00:36:25.400 So here's my hypothesis.
00:36:29.960 There are two possibilities,
00:36:32.600 I think,
00:36:33.520 that is suggested
00:36:34.360 by this whole situation.
00:36:36.000 And they're opposites,
00:36:37.040 which is interesting.
00:36:38.520 One possibility
00:36:39.320 is that they really
00:36:40.160 do have something on Trump.
00:36:41.820 And it's good.
00:36:43.120 I mean,
00:36:43.480 from their point of view.
00:36:44.420 From the Jerry Nadler
00:36:45.800 point of view,
00:36:46.300 it would be good.
00:36:47.960 So that's one possibility.
00:36:49.400 They have the goods,
00:36:50.820 but they need these documents
00:36:52.400 to really seal the deal.
00:36:55.220 That's one possibility.
00:36:56.920 The other possibility
00:36:58.100 is desperation.
00:37:00.220 The other possibility
00:37:01.080 is that they know
00:37:01.840 they don't have anything
00:37:02.700 and nobody has anything.
00:37:03.820 That all of the various
00:37:05.460 walls are closing in
00:37:07.240 theories
00:37:09.100 have all turned to dust.
00:37:11.540 And they watched
00:37:12.260 the January 6th thing
00:37:13.320 turn to complete crap
00:37:14.440 right in front of them.
00:37:15.800 It could be
00:37:16.800 that they're so afraid
00:37:18.400 of Trump getting the power
00:37:20.000 to hire a special prosecutor
00:37:24.240 that they can't take the chance.
00:37:28.140 Because once the Trump
00:37:29.260 administration gets in there,
00:37:30.680 one assumes,
00:37:32.000 they're going to look into
00:37:33.200 the Bidens' association
00:37:34.880 with Ukraine.
00:37:39.060 And they're going to be
00:37:39.900 looking at a lot of stuff
00:37:40.980 that maybe wasn't
00:37:41.760 being looked at.
00:37:42.700 You know,
00:37:42.880 the Hunter laptop stuff.
00:37:45.280 And so I've got a feeling
00:37:46.360 that this is
00:37:47.180 a desperate attempt
00:37:49.140 to try to keep
00:37:50.520 the Bidens out of jail
00:37:51.720 and people associated
00:37:53.320 with them.
00:37:54.440 It looks to me
00:37:55.620 like desperation.
00:37:59.440 Because under the scenario
00:38:01.840 that they really have
00:38:02.940 something real
00:38:03.680 and that just finding
00:38:05.300 something at Mar-a-Lago
00:38:07.320 would be the final thing,
00:38:08.880 what are the odds of that?
00:38:11.200 I mean,
00:38:11.760 as I talked about before,
00:38:12.960 what are the odds
00:38:13.820 that Trump would keep
00:38:15.560 something incriminating
00:38:16.860 on a piece of paper?
00:38:18.580 I don't know if I've mentioned,
00:38:21.000 but paper is easy to destroy.
00:38:23.040 You could flush it.
00:38:24.780 Yeah,
00:38:25.080 you could flush it.
00:38:27.980 So it seems deeply unlikely
00:38:29.640 that there's something
00:38:30.420 in there that's incriminating.
00:38:32.480 It's more likely
00:38:33.520 that he wanted
00:38:34.140 to keep some things,
00:38:35.640 you know,
00:38:35.840 maybe embarrassing,
00:38:37.560 but that's not a crime.
00:38:42.340 I'm going to tell
00:38:43.100 the locals' people
00:38:44.680 some stuff
00:38:46.340 after I turn off YouTube
00:38:47.740 in a little bit.
00:38:49.120 I give them
00:38:49.680 the behind-the-curdon stuff
00:38:50.940 that I can't say
00:38:51.800 in a more public way.
00:38:54.840 So there is something fun
00:38:56.440 about this story
00:38:57.180 that nobody's mentioned yet.
00:38:58.540 So I'll mention that
00:38:59.260 just to the locals' people
00:39:00.240 later.
00:39:01.600 So stay tuned for that.
00:39:04.480 All right.
00:39:06.760 So those are
00:39:07.480 your two possibilities.
00:39:09.160 Which one seems
00:39:10.100 more likely?
00:39:12.680 Does it seem likely
00:39:13.900 that the Democrats
00:39:16.280 would have some kind
00:39:17.660 of allegation
00:39:18.580 that's so strong
00:39:20.260 that Trump would be
00:39:20.980 in actual legal danger,
00:39:22.800 and yet that allegation
00:39:23.800 would be so strong
00:39:24.960 that they need
00:39:26.840 these documents
00:39:27.680 that are in Mar-a-Lago
00:39:28.740 to make the case?
00:39:32.440 Do you think
00:39:33.180 that's likely?
00:39:34.840 Do you think
00:39:35.380 it's likely
00:39:35.960 that something
00:39:36.480 in his possession
00:39:37.400 would make their case?
00:39:39.740 I feel like
00:39:40.740 that's the least likely
00:39:41.820 thing in the world.
00:39:44.120 I mean,
00:39:44.360 it just feels
00:39:44.800 ridiculously unlikely.
00:39:46.440 Possible.
00:39:47.760 Possible.
00:39:49.120 But ridiculously unlikely.
00:39:54.420 All right.
00:39:55.120 So to me,
00:39:55.620 it looks political.
00:39:56.940 So it looks political
00:39:58.360 based on the history
00:39:59.300 of the FBI,
00:40:01.100 the fact that
00:40:01.740 there was no larger
00:40:03.880 allegation
00:40:04.740 that this is
00:40:06.040 obviously tied to,
00:40:07.080 the timing of it,
00:40:10.560 and the way
00:40:12.460 it was done.
00:40:14.240 Every single thing
00:40:15.300 about this
00:40:15.800 screams fraud
00:40:16.900 and corruption.
00:40:20.380 Every part of it.
00:40:22.000 Now here's the thing.
00:40:23.580 If you're a citizen
00:40:24.620 of the United States
00:40:25.420 and you're accused
00:40:26.320 of something,
00:40:27.040 what is the standard
00:40:28.040 to which we hold you?
00:40:30.900 Everybody?
00:40:32.160 What is the standard
00:40:33.080 when somebody
00:40:33.860 who is an American citizen
00:40:35.040 is accused of a crime?
00:40:37.080 The standard is
00:40:38.380 innocent
00:40:40.380 until proven guilty.
00:40:42.760 And we all agree
00:40:43.580 with that, right?
00:40:44.720 Like that's one thing
00:40:45.720 every American
00:40:46.680 is going to say,
00:40:47.180 yeah, okay.
00:40:48.500 We can disagree a lot,
00:40:50.520 but innocent
00:40:51.800 until proven guilty,
00:40:53.460 that's a bottom line.
00:40:55.460 That is a bottom line
00:40:57.140 American principle.
00:40:58.500 You don't play
00:40:59.800 with that one.
00:41:01.040 All right.
00:41:01.860 Now,
00:41:02.660 that's how we treat
00:41:03.580 citizens.
00:41:04.040 How do we treat
00:41:06.020 government organizations?
00:41:08.160 Remember,
00:41:08.560 an organization
00:41:09.040 is not a person.
00:41:11.120 Organizations don't have
00:41:12.540 constitutional rights.
00:41:14.040 People do.
00:41:15.520 So what should be
00:41:16.500 your guiding assumption
00:41:17.840 about the guilt
00:41:19.340 of the FBI
00:41:20.120 in this case?
00:41:22.460 It should be guilty.
00:41:24.540 Your starting assumption
00:41:25.560 should be guilty.
00:41:26.940 And you can be forgiven
00:41:28.320 for that.
00:41:29.540 You can be forgiven.
00:41:30.620 Now,
00:41:31.780 if the FBI
00:41:32.340 had a spotless record
00:41:33.940 up to this point,
00:41:35.680 they still need
00:41:37.380 to make their argument.
00:41:39.980 They still got to
00:41:41.040 make a good case,
00:41:42.240 and they haven't done that.
00:41:44.160 I mean,
00:41:44.420 maybe they will.
00:41:45.680 Anything could happen.
00:41:47.240 But you have to assume
00:41:48.360 that the FBI
00:41:49.300 is guilty
00:41:49.980 unless they prove
00:41:51.100 otherwise.
00:41:52.680 So your best
00:41:55.280 citizen,
00:41:56.960 positive,
00:41:58.360 protect-the-republic
00:42:00.640 point of view
00:42:01.400 is that the FBI
00:42:02.760 is corrupt
00:42:03.560 in this specific case.
00:42:06.520 That's the best thing
00:42:07.620 you could assume
00:42:08.220 as a citizen.
00:42:08.880 It's the thing
00:42:10.060 that protects
00:42:10.640 the system the best.
00:42:12.520 If you want to
00:42:13.360 protect the American
00:42:14.220 system,
00:42:15.340 you should start
00:42:16.220 with a solid assumption
00:42:17.520 that the FBI
00:42:18.260 is corrupt
00:42:18.980 in this case
00:42:20.480 in particular,
00:42:22.000 based on pattern
00:42:23.440 in history.
00:42:23.920 they need to
00:42:25.840 prove the fuck
00:42:26.800 out of that
00:42:27.460 if they want
00:42:28.620 to change my mind.
00:42:30.280 Do you know
00:42:30.680 how hard it's going
00:42:31.300 to be to change
00:42:31.860 my mind
00:42:32.480 that this was
00:42:33.440 anything but
00:42:34.000 a political thing?
00:42:36.380 Very hard.
00:42:37.780 They're going to
00:42:38.280 have to prove it
00:42:38.940 beyond reasonable doubt,
00:42:40.760 and they're going
00:42:42.000 to have to try hard.
00:42:43.640 And if we don't
00:42:44.840 hold them to that
00:42:45.660 standard,
00:42:46.920 I'm not sure
00:42:48.220 we should expect
00:42:49.900 that our standard
00:42:50.760 will be held to either.
00:42:51.860 or the innocent
00:42:53.080 until proven guilty,
00:42:54.200 the thing you like,
00:42:55.420 I don't know
00:42:56.080 if that can hold up
00:42:56.860 either.
00:42:58.080 If you let the FBI
00:42:59.420 get away with
00:43:00.440 innocent until proven
00:43:01.640 guilty when it's
00:43:02.660 obvious they don't
00:43:03.920 play that way,
00:43:05.400 they play guilty.
00:43:08.000 We know that.
00:43:08.880 That's not a question.
00:43:11.720 So the best,
00:43:14.720 wisest,
00:43:16.260 most practical,
00:43:18.280 most useful
00:43:19.220 starting point of view
00:43:20.300 is that the FBI
00:43:21.920 is guilty
00:43:22.540 in this case,
00:43:23.540 and they'd better
00:43:24.280 prove otherwise.
00:43:25.580 And I'll wait.
00:43:27.060 So I think,
00:43:31.180 you know,
00:43:31.420 I tweeted yesterday,
00:43:32.280 I'll give my government
00:43:33.020 48 hours,
00:43:34.680 because I think
00:43:35.340 48 hours is enough
00:43:37.320 that the fog of war
00:43:38.680 situation will calm
00:43:39.820 down a little bit.
00:43:40.980 And then after 48 hours,
00:43:42.560 people said,
00:43:43.440 well,
00:43:43.740 what then,
00:43:44.240 cartoon boy?
00:43:45.460 What are you going to do?
00:43:46.860 Make a witty cartoon
00:43:49.640 about it?
00:43:50.820 No,
00:43:51.260 I'm not threatening.
00:43:52.640 I'm saying that
00:43:53.280 after 48 hours,
00:43:54.320 I'll form an opinion.
00:43:56.720 Does that sound radical?
00:43:59.040 That I'm going to wait
00:44:00.080 until I know enough
00:44:01.680 about this situation
00:44:02.700 to form an opinion.
00:44:05.100 I didn't tell you
00:44:05.720 what the opinion
00:44:06.200 is going to be.
00:44:07.520 If I told you
00:44:08.140 what,
00:44:08.520 if I told you
00:44:09.560 it was a threat,
00:44:11.540 as in,
00:44:12.360 you know,
00:44:12.540 if this happens,
00:44:13.600 I'll do something,
00:44:14.600 I don't know what.
00:44:16.260 It's not a threat.
00:44:17.220 I'm just telling you
00:44:19.040 what's the minimum
00:44:19.640 I need to form an opinion.
00:44:21.460 I need some information,
00:44:23.240 you know,
00:44:23.460 beyond the fog of war.
00:44:24.740 I need some actual
00:44:25.780 useful information.
00:44:27.420 So when I get that,
00:44:28.520 I'm going to form an opinion.
00:44:29.900 But I'm definitely
00:44:30.460 not going to form one yet.
00:44:32.440 At this point,
00:44:33.240 we have questions.
00:44:35.160 We have speculation.
00:44:37.060 We have a complete
00:44:38.840 lack of trust
00:44:39.680 in our institutions.
00:44:41.200 But that's earned.
00:44:43.400 So we don't need
00:44:44.220 to change that.
00:44:46.620 Erica says,
00:44:47.460 you sit on the fence.
00:44:48.980 Do I?
00:44:50.380 Erica?
00:44:52.700 Am I sitting on the fence?
00:44:55.700 Or am I waiting
00:44:57.380 to find out
00:44:58.080 what's actually happening?
00:45:00.320 I'm not sure
00:45:00.980 that's the same.
00:45:02.760 Because one of them
00:45:03.400 is Erica.
00:45:07.400 All right,
00:45:07.700 here I'm talking
00:45:08.500 to the fake Erica.
00:45:10.760 You know,
00:45:11.140 apparently there's
00:45:12.040 more than one Erica
00:45:12.840 in the situation here.
00:45:15.220 So we've got one Erica
00:45:16.440 on the locals' platform.
00:45:18.080 But we're not talking
00:45:18.980 about that Erica.
00:45:21.580 We're talking about
00:45:22.500 all capital letters Erica
00:45:23.860 over here on YouTube.
00:45:26.140 Dark Erica.
00:45:29.000 Yeah,
00:45:29.300 have you heard
00:45:29.560 that the Democrats
00:45:30.880 are calling Biden
00:45:31.720 dark Brandon?
00:45:33.280 They're trying to take
00:45:34.280 advantage of the
00:45:35.000 negative labeling.
00:45:36.880 It's not working.
00:45:40.940 All right.
00:45:41.580 Do I think
00:45:45.600 the queens
00:45:46.120 of drilling
00:45:46.680 dry holes
00:45:48.080 finally hit oil?
00:45:49.820 Probably not.
00:45:59.960 All right.
00:46:04.920 Giving the benefit
00:46:05.920 of a doubt.
00:46:06.400 Did I just do that?
00:46:10.820 Did I just give
00:46:11.440 the FBI
00:46:11.940 the benefit
00:46:12.540 of a doubt
00:46:13.160 while saying
00:46:14.340 they couldn't
00:46:14.780 be trusted?
00:46:15.520 That's what
00:46:15.800 somebody on YouTube
00:46:16.440 says.
00:46:17.680 No.
00:46:18.840 I'm not giving
00:46:19.600 anybody the benefit
00:46:20.380 of a doubt.
00:46:22.080 I'm saying
00:46:22.760 that I'll know
00:46:23.400 more tomorrow.
00:46:25.380 How is that
00:46:26.100 even provocative?
00:46:28.960 The most reasonable
00:46:30.160 opinion in the world
00:46:31.020 is,
00:46:31.500 huh,
00:46:32.200 maybe I'll wait
00:46:32.820 and hear what
00:46:33.240 this warrants
00:46:33.740 all about
00:46:34.140 before I make
00:46:34.720 an opinion.
00:46:35.040 Because what
00:46:37.180 if they come
00:46:37.620 up with
00:46:38.120 there was a
00:46:40.000 hostage
00:46:40.420 or some
00:46:41.360 damn thing?
00:46:42.080 Anything
00:46:42.400 could happen.
00:46:44.120 And remember,
00:46:45.160 there's a chance
00:46:46.140 that this is
00:46:47.240 all a trick.
00:46:49.160 One possibility
00:46:50.280 is that Trump
00:46:52.120 knew there was
00:46:53.420 nothing there
00:46:53.980 but he baited
00:46:55.060 them into
00:46:55.480 raiding him
00:46:56.000 to get these
00:46:56.540 documents.
00:46:58.080 Maybe.
00:46:59.060 He may have
00:47:00.080 tricked them
00:47:00.960 into thinking
00:47:01.480 there was
00:47:01.840 something there
00:47:02.360 that they needed
00:47:03.020 so that there
00:47:03.580 would be
00:47:03.800 a raid
00:47:04.220 which would
00:47:05.680 be amazingly
00:47:06.620 clever.
00:47:08.180 But,
00:47:08.560 you know,
00:47:08.800 I don't assume
00:47:09.400 that's true.
00:47:10.460 I think that
00:47:11.040 would be a little
00:47:11.500 too clever.
00:47:13.000 But you can't
00:47:13.660 rule it out.
00:47:14.600 We're at the
00:47:15.200 point where
00:47:15.680 nothing can be
00:47:16.360 ruled out
00:47:16.800 at this point.
00:47:17.280 Yeah, I don't
00:47:25.000 think it's
00:47:25.400 3D chess
00:47:26.100 but can't
00:47:26.760 rule it
00:47:27.040 out.
00:47:35.060 I agree
00:47:36.740 with what
00:47:37.100 you're saying.
00:47:38.560 Somebody at
00:47:39.200 Locals was
00:47:39.720 saying it's
00:47:40.660 so hard to
00:47:41.520 be friends
00:47:42.380 with a
00:47:42.700 Democrat
00:47:43.020 now.
00:47:44.600 It really
00:47:45.340 is.
00:47:45.760 It really
00:47:47.460 is.
00:47:48.900 The only
00:47:49.600 way you can
00:47:49.940 do it is
00:47:50.300 if they
00:47:50.560 don't follow
00:47:51.080 politics.
00:47:52.420 If they
00:47:52.760 follow politics
00:47:53.400 you just
00:47:53.840 can't even
00:47:54.380 hang out
00:47:54.740 with them.
00:47:57.560 Scott's
00:47:58.040 waking up.
00:48:01.500 Now,
00:48:02.240 I did
00:48:05.040 learn
00:48:05.380 that at
00:48:07.700 least one
00:48:08.100 person when
00:48:08.640 they say
00:48:09.000 Scott's
00:48:09.460 waking up
00:48:10.040 is just
00:48:12.340 joking.
00:48:12.740 so I'm
00:48:14.620 going to
00:48:14.820 treat it
00:48:15.140 like it's
00:48:15.800 just joking
00:48:16.320 when you
00:48:16.620 say that
00:48:17.040 because I
00:48:17.600 don't know
00:48:17.880 the difference.
00:48:24.360 You've
00:48:24.900 lost friends
00:48:25.500 since listening
00:48:26.100 to my
00:48:26.580 podcast.
00:48:29.100 How many
00:48:29.780 of you have
00:48:30.240 lost friends
00:48:30.920 because of
00:48:31.420 something I've
00:48:31.940 said?
00:48:34.400 Oh my
00:48:37.040 God.
00:48:37.360 because of
00:48:39.160 something I
00:48:39.620 said?
00:48:41.340 Well,
00:48:42.780 it turns
00:48:43.000 out I've
00:48:43.480 cost a lot
00:48:44.100 of people
00:48:44.360 their friends.
00:48:47.360 You're all
00:48:47.960 saying yes.
00:48:48.860 Are you
00:48:49.220 serious?
00:48:52.520 Somebody
00:48:52.960 said check
00:48:53.440 the market.
00:48:56.260 What is the
00:48:57.000 stock market
00:48:57.560 doing?
00:49:00.320 Nothing.
00:49:00.720 Why did
00:49:03.680 you say
00:49:03.900 check the
00:49:04.300 market?
00:49:04.820 There's
00:49:04.960 not really
00:49:05.560 anything
00:49:05.840 happening.
00:49:09.120 Your
00:49:09.600 friends are
00:49:10.080 tired of
00:49:10.560 you quoting
00:49:11.060 me.
00:49:12.240 Does
00:49:12.680 anybody else
00:49:13.140 have that
00:49:13.440 problem?
00:49:14.520 Oh my
00:49:14.920 God.
00:49:15.980 Apparently
00:49:16.320 I've
00:49:16.600 cost a
00:49:17.000 lot of
00:49:17.220 you a
00:49:17.460 lot of
00:49:17.700 friends.
00:49:19.140 Oh my
00:49:19.540 God.
00:49:20.000 This is
00:49:20.520 horrifying.
00:49:22.440 My wife
00:49:23.200 doesn't like
00:49:23.760 hearing you.
00:49:28.160 How many
00:49:29.520 of you have
00:49:30.060 a spouse
00:49:31.160 or a
00:49:32.400 significant
00:49:32.780 other
00:49:33.200 who
00:49:34.440 can't
00:49:36.400 stand your
00:49:37.120 habit of
00:49:37.740 listening to
00:49:38.260 me?
00:49:39.740 Does
00:49:40.140 anybody have
00:49:40.580 a spouse
00:49:41.020 who's going
00:49:41.480 crazy?
00:49:46.360 Can you
00:49:47.140 do me a
00:49:48.220 favor?
00:49:48.560 If you
00:49:48.780 have a
00:49:49.040 spouse
00:49:49.440 who hates
00:49:51.240 you listening
00:49:51.740 to me,
00:49:52.600 could you
00:49:52.940 just turn
00:49:53.340 up the
00:49:53.640 sound right
00:49:54.280 now?
00:49:55.300 Because I
00:49:55.720 have a
00:49:56.080 message for
00:49:56.540 your spouse.
00:49:57.880 I'll give
00:49:58.180 you a
00:49:58.700 second.
00:49:59.060 Everybody,
00:50:00.060 could you
00:50:00.400 just turn
00:50:01.040 up your
00:50:01.540 volume really
00:50:02.780 loud if
00:50:04.260 your spouse
00:50:04.720 is around?
00:50:05.700 I want to
00:50:06.060 talk to your
00:50:06.480 spouse for a
00:50:07.060 second.
00:50:07.800 I think that's
00:50:08.480 long enough.
00:50:09.060 Are you
00:50:09.220 ready?
00:50:10.740 Hey,
00:50:11.280 spouse,
00:50:12.180 you should
00:50:12.840 totally be
00:50:13.520 listening to
00:50:14.820 these live
00:50:15.420 streams because
00:50:16.680 you would
00:50:16.980 learn so
00:50:17.460 much.
00:50:18.720 Your spouse
00:50:19.380 is the
00:50:19.940 smart one.
00:50:21.320 You should
00:50:21.760 be possibly
00:50:22.700 doing more
00:50:23.360 things for
00:50:24.200 him or her
00:50:24.860 because the
00:50:26.080 smart one is
00:50:26.660 watching my
00:50:27.240 live stream.
00:50:28.620 Now you've
00:50:29.300 been warned.
00:50:30.620 If you're
00:50:31.060 watching the
00:50:31.620 other news,
00:50:32.740 you're deeply
00:50:33.320 uninformed.
00:50:35.260 Join your
00:50:35.820 spouse.
00:50:37.220 Join your
00:50:37.900 spouse.
00:50:41.460 You can
00:50:42.060 turn that
00:50:42.400 into volume
00:50:42.780 now.
00:50:44.640 I feel
00:50:45.240 like we
00:50:46.780 came together
00:50:47.360 a little bit
00:50:47.840 there.
00:50:48.720 Did you
00:50:49.040 feel it?
00:50:50.440 Yeah.
00:50:51.260 It was like
00:50:51.880 the world
00:50:52.220 was divided
00:50:52.900 and then I
00:50:53.480 feel like we
00:50:53.880 brought them
00:50:54.280 together.
00:50:54.580 bonding,
00:50:57.800 exactly.
00:51:00.860 Anne says
00:51:01.700 no sex
00:51:02.220 for a
00:51:02.540 month for
00:51:03.360 her.
00:51:05.780 So
00:51:06.060 Anne's
00:51:08.040 available.
00:51:08.400 Oh,
00:51:08.800 that's too
00:51:18.340 funny.
00:51:18.620 if there's
00:51:21.640 anybody else
00:51:22.180 not getting
00:51:22.640 sex from
00:51:23.160 their spouse,
00:51:24.120 you might
00:51:24.900 want to
00:51:25.140 call it
00:51:25.460 out here
00:51:25.820 because there's
00:51:26.440 plenty of
00:51:26.800 people who
00:51:27.160 are willing
00:51:27.400 to fill
00:51:27.800 in.
00:51:30.680 I'm just
00:51:31.300 talking about
00:51:31.960 transitory
00:51:32.960 sex.
00:51:34.580 I'm not
00:51:34.920 talking about
00:51:35.380 the permanent
00:51:35.880 kind of a
00:51:36.420 sex partner.
00:51:37.460 I just
00:51:37.940 mean to get
00:51:38.660 you past
00:51:39.060 the live
00:51:39.500 stream and
00:51:40.120 through the
00:51:40.480 political
00:51:40.840 period,
00:51:42.060 more of a
00:51:42.520 transitory
00:51:43.580 cheating.
00:51:44.240 so you
00:51:47.640 got that to
00:51:48.120 look forward
00:51:48.520 to.
00:51:51.080 Oh,
00:51:51.600 my.
00:51:57.000 I've
00:51:57.480 taught all
00:51:57.920 of you how
00:51:58.320 to lose
00:51:58.620 your friends.
00:52:01.620 Oh,
00:52:02.180 that's more
00:52:03.360 than true.
00:52:07.500 All right.
00:52:08.340 All right,
00:52:08.760 well,
00:52:08.920 let me ask
00:52:09.280 on the
00:52:09.540 positive side.
00:52:10.720 How many
00:52:11.180 of you
00:52:11.600 have bonded
00:52:13.180 with your
00:52:13.880 spouse or
00:52:14.520 significant
00:52:15.000 other or
00:52:15.720 even a
00:52:16.080 family member
00:52:16.640 over my
00:52:18.240 live stream?
00:52:19.840 Is there
00:52:20.480 anybody here
00:52:21.160 who listens
00:52:21.840 to it with
00:52:22.340 their mom,
00:52:23.580 for example?
00:52:28.180 I know
00:52:28.960 some of you
00:52:29.940 do.
00:52:31.420 Some of you
00:52:32.120 listen to it
00:52:32.660 with your
00:52:32.940 mom.
00:52:33.640 All right.
00:52:34.120 Okay,
00:52:34.580 good.
00:52:35.600 See,
00:52:35.940 I'm bringing
00:52:36.300 people together.
00:52:37.740 I'm bringing
00:52:38.300 families together.
00:52:39.180 I'm not just
00:52:39.800 ripping people
00:52:40.420 apart.
00:52:41.320 I'm bringing
00:52:41.980 them together.
00:52:43.880 All right,
00:52:44.640 good.
00:52:46.600 So,
00:52:47.320 let me ask
00:52:48.120 you this.
00:52:48.840 How many
00:52:49.300 of you
00:52:49.860 came into
00:52:50.420 this live
00:52:50.960 stream
00:52:51.320 on fire
00:52:53.060 because of
00:52:54.760 the raid
00:52:55.380 on Mar-a-Lago
00:52:56.300 and I
00:52:58.160 talked you
00:52:58.680 down a
00:52:59.080 little bit?
00:53:00.180 Do you feel
00:53:00.700 more relaxed?
00:53:02.440 Just wait
00:53:03.100 and see.
00:53:04.020 Because,
00:53:04.620 first of all,
00:53:05.440 if what you
00:53:06.020 want is a
00:53:06.660 Trump presidency,
00:53:07.940 I think
00:53:08.720 he got
00:53:09.040 closer.
00:53:09.520 If this
00:53:12.680 follows the
00:53:13.380 pattern of
00:53:14.040 every other
00:53:14.640 thing we've
00:53:15.180 seen,
00:53:16.100 the pattern
00:53:16.660 would be
00:53:17.100 they're
00:53:17.760 over-claiming,
00:53:19.420 they don't
00:53:20.220 have evidence
00:53:20.840 of any
00:53:21.180 kinds of
00:53:21.600 crimes,
00:53:22.400 they're going
00:53:22.940 to act
00:53:23.240 like they
00:53:23.620 do,
00:53:24.540 and then
00:53:24.960 the Republicans
00:53:25.640 are going
00:53:26.040 to get
00:53:26.260 really,
00:53:26.940 really mad
00:53:27.580 that they
00:53:28.660 have been
00:53:28.940 hunted.
00:53:31.140 By the
00:53:31.740 way,
00:53:32.120 have I
00:53:32.420 ever made
00:53:32.820 a better
00:53:33.160 prediction
00:53:33.580 than the
00:53:34.200 one I
00:53:34.500 most mocked
00:53:35.340 for,
00:53:36.520 that Republicans
00:53:37.200 would get
00:53:37.680 hunted?
00:53:37.940 Your dog,
00:53:46.260 does anybody
00:53:46.660 have a pet
00:53:47.340 who likes
00:53:47.840 to listen
00:53:48.240 to me
00:53:48.640 in the
00:53:48.920 morning?
00:53:50.020 Anybody?
00:53:50.760 Does anybody
00:53:51.220 have a pet?
00:53:52.520 Dog or a
00:53:53.220 cat?
00:53:54.380 Yes,
00:53:54.840 dogs mostly,
00:53:55.780 right?
00:53:56.640 Yeah,
00:53:57.060 because I
00:53:57.400 don't really
00:53:57.720 speak to
00:53:58.100 the cats.
00:54:00.400 I try
00:54:01.120 to do
00:54:01.700 content
00:54:02.500 that leans
00:54:03.500 human canine
00:54:05.500 and a
00:54:06.800 little bit
00:54:07.140 less
00:54:07.520 cat.
00:54:14.500 Cats won't
00:54:15.240 listen.
00:54:15.700 Well,
00:54:16.000 you need
00:54:16.340 new cats.
00:54:21.560 You lost
00:54:22.340 your pet
00:54:22.700 friends.
00:54:23.080 I don't
00:54:23.240 know.
00:54:24.260 Somebody
00:54:24.660 lost their
00:54:25.260 pet friends
00:54:25.980 because of
00:54:26.900 listening.
00:54:27.380 That's bad.
00:54:28.700 I'm sorry.
00:54:30.200 The pets
00:54:30.540 couldn't handle
00:54:31.020 you anymore.
00:54:32.060 Was it
00:54:32.680 because you
00:54:33.040 were quoting
00:54:33.480 me too
00:54:33.820 much?
00:54:36.020 Has anybody
00:54:36.740 ever quoted
00:54:37.300 me?
00:54:46.280 I've got a
00:54:46.980 feeling that
00:54:47.380 happens sometimes.
00:54:49.020 You know,
00:54:49.280 I was,
00:54:50.380 before I did
00:54:51.260 any public
00:54:51.980 stuff,
00:54:54.360 here's a
00:54:55.080 little weird
00:54:55.880 little anecdote
00:54:56.520 since I have a
00:54:57.360 minute here.
00:54:57.680 back in my
00:54:59.920 corporate days
00:55:00.460 before I
00:55:01.080 started
00:55:01.460 Dilbert,
00:55:02.020 before I
00:55:02.380 had any
00:55:02.820 kind of
00:55:03.560 public
00:55:04.140 notoriety,
00:55:05.360 when I
00:55:06.060 was just
00:55:06.480 guy in
00:55:07.060 cubicle,
00:55:08.560 one of the
00:55:08.980 things I
00:55:09.340 noticed was
00:55:10.060 that my
00:55:11.300 boss's
00:55:12.960 boss
00:55:13.400 would quote
00:55:14.940 me.
00:55:16.900 And the
00:55:17.560 first time it
00:55:18.000 happened,
00:55:18.280 I thought,
00:55:18.820 oh,
00:55:19.520 look at me
00:55:20.200 saying something
00:55:20.940 so well
00:55:22.080 that it
00:55:22.460 got quoted
00:55:22.940 by,
00:55:23.300 you know,
00:55:24.480 a senior
00:55:25.340 member of
00:55:25.980 the company.
00:55:28.840 And then I
00:55:29.480 noticed it
00:55:29.900 happened again.
00:55:33.080 And I
00:55:33.860 realized,
00:55:34.560 well before I
00:55:35.360 was famous,
00:55:35.900 I realized that
00:55:36.540 I was quotable,
00:55:38.280 like weirdly
00:55:38.840 quotable,
00:55:40.100 because people
00:55:40.760 were doing it.
00:55:41.820 And I don't
00:55:42.460 remember a lot
00:55:43.040 of other people
00:55:43.660 who were being
00:55:44.160 quoted as
00:55:45.160 co-workers.
00:55:46.080 It was sort
00:55:46.600 of an odd
00:55:46.960 thing.
00:55:47.160 But apparently
00:55:48.380 I had the
00:55:49.140 ability to
00:55:49.900 wordsmith
00:55:51.040 clever little
00:55:52.620 sentences that
00:55:53.560 people like to
00:55:54.100 quote.
00:55:54.980 And honestly
00:55:56.500 to me,
00:55:57.920 that was the
00:55:58.740 first signal
00:56:00.360 that I received
00:56:01.420 that I could
00:56:02.580 do something
00:56:03.020 in public
00:56:03.480 that people
00:56:03.940 would care
00:56:04.300 about.
00:56:05.280 Now I
00:56:05.640 always imagined
00:56:06.320 it,
00:56:06.700 like I
00:56:07.060 visualized it,
00:56:08.300 so I imagined
00:56:08.940 myself doing
00:56:09.600 things in
00:56:10.080 public long
00:56:11.160 before I had
00:56:11.740 any public
00:56:12.320 interaction.
00:56:14.920 But I
00:56:15.540 didn't have
00:56:15.900 any,
00:56:16.420 you know,
00:56:16.900 reason to
00:56:17.740 think it,
00:56:18.500 it was just
00:56:18.940 a vision.
00:56:20.020 But once I
00:56:21.000 saw regular
00:56:21.760 people quoting
00:56:22.580 me,
00:56:23.740 I thought,
00:56:24.680 well,
00:56:25.500 there must
00:56:25.840 be something
00:56:26.300 I do with
00:56:26.940 words that
00:56:27.540 people want
00:56:27.980 to hear.
00:56:29.040 And sure
00:56:29.380 enough,
00:56:30.020 turns out
00:56:30.500 people like
00:56:31.840 to hear me
00:56:32.400 put words
00:56:32.960 together in
00:56:33.700 a variety
00:56:34.160 of different
00:56:34.700 formats.
00:56:38.840 So I
00:56:39.540 would look
00:56:39.820 for that,
00:56:40.200 by the way.
00:56:40.880 So if
00:56:41.140 you're looking
00:56:41.500 for somebody
00:56:42.380 to,
00:56:42.940 you know,
00:56:43.340 maybe break
00:56:44.920 out from
00:56:45.420 your work
00:56:46.340 situation,
00:56:47.360 look for
00:56:47.820 people that
00:56:48.320 you quote.
00:56:50.200 Because it
00:56:50.740 could even
00:56:51.080 be like a
00:56:51.680 kid in your
00:56:52.200 family.
00:56:53.200 Some of you
00:56:53.700 have that
00:56:54.020 situation,
00:56:54.600 right?
00:56:55.180 There'll be
00:56:55.480 like a 12-year-old
00:56:56.360 in your family
00:56:56.940 and you find
00:56:57.340 yourself quoting
00:56:58.080 the 12-year-old
00:56:58.840 because they
00:56:59.740 actually said
00:57:00.220 something that
00:57:00.600 was kind of
00:57:00.960 cool and you
00:57:01.720 actually just
00:57:02.180 liked it.
00:57:03.560 Just keep an
00:57:04.340 eye on that.
00:57:05.080 If that happens
00:57:05.680 more than once,
00:57:07.440 if you find
00:57:08.000 yourself quoting
00:57:08.860 a 12-year-old
00:57:09.640 more than once,
00:57:11.560 buy some stock
00:57:12.520 in that 12-year-old.
00:57:13.340 Because that's
00:57:16.340 a kid who's
00:57:16.780 going somewhere.
00:57:20.980 Quoting
00:57:21.460 yourself is
00:57:22.680 quite fine.
00:57:25.780 How many of
00:57:26.560 you think that
00:57:27.220 my voice is
00:57:29.060 somehow related
00:57:29.900 to why you
00:57:31.840 watch this?
00:57:33.300 Because in my
00:57:34.240 opinion, my
00:57:34.940 voice is terrible.
00:57:35.800 I'm always
00:57:36.060 clearing my
00:57:36.740 throat and
00:57:37.340 sneezing and
00:57:38.740 full of
00:57:39.460 allergies.
00:57:39.860 So a little
00:57:45.460 bit both
00:57:46.180 ways.
00:57:48.820 Yeah, I
00:57:49.560 told you
00:57:49.920 before, I
00:57:50.480 listened to my
00:57:51.340 voice five
00:57:52.080 years ago on
00:57:53.560 the Joe Rogan
00:57:54.760 show or
00:57:55.980 whenever it
00:57:56.480 was.
00:57:57.540 And it's
00:57:58.560 really different
00:57:59.180 now.
00:58:00.940 So five
00:58:01.760 years ago, my
00:58:02.520 voice sounded
00:58:03.060 like a senior
00:58:03.660 citizen because
00:58:04.400 it was still
00:58:04.800 weak from the
00:58:05.920 years of not
00:58:06.460 being able to
00:58:06.900 speak.
00:58:07.600 But because I
00:58:08.300 do this for an
00:58:08.900 hour a day,
00:58:09.860 my voice just
00:58:11.300 got stronger.
00:58:12.060 I was listening
00:58:12.600 to it recently
00:58:13.260 and it sounds
00:58:14.920 younger.
00:58:16.640 Oh, what do
00:58:17.140 you think?
00:58:17.520 Instead of me
00:58:18.280 telling you, I'll
00:58:19.000 ask you, does
00:58:19.980 my current
00:58:20.560 voice sound
00:58:22.200 younger than
00:58:22.960 my age?
00:58:25.660 I think it
00:58:26.480 does.
00:58:27.980 But it's only
00:58:29.040 because it's
00:58:29.540 stronger.
00:58:30.800 And I think
00:58:31.260 anybody who
00:58:31.920 practices their
00:58:32.920 voice muscles,
00:58:34.900 I think if
00:58:35.580 your voice gets
00:58:36.760 stronger, it
00:58:38.940 makes you feel
00:58:39.540 younger.
00:58:41.100 I mean, you
00:58:41.560 register as
00:58:42.200 younger.
00:58:43.420 Because I
00:58:43.960 think the
00:58:44.780 old person
00:58:46.180 voice you
00:58:46.700 hear is
00:58:47.100 weakness,
00:58:47.700 right?
00:58:48.660 If you
00:58:49.160 listen to
00:58:49.580 an old
00:58:49.880 person, it
00:58:50.360 sounds like
00:58:50.880 there's
00:58:51.140 literally muscle
00:58:52.160 weakness,
00:58:52.780 like, get
00:58:54.740 off of my
00:58:55.340 lawn.
00:58:56.560 You know, like
00:58:56.920 there's just
00:58:57.220 no muscle
00:58:57.740 there.
00:58:59.140 And speaking
00:59:00.400 is like every
00:59:01.060 other muscle.
00:59:03.200 The more
00:59:03.820 you do, the
00:59:04.620 better you can
00:59:05.180 do it.
00:59:05.560 So the
00:59:06.140 fact that I
00:59:06.600 do it a
00:59:07.020 lot is
00:59:08.160 what makes
00:59:08.600 me age
00:59:09.320 backwards.
00:59:11.720 I do feel
00:59:12.480 like I'm
00:59:12.800 aging backwards
00:59:13.440 in some
00:59:13.840 ways.
00:59:22.080 Did you
00:59:26.620 turn off
00:59:26.980 YouTube?
00:59:27.380 No, not
00:59:27.740 yet.
00:59:30.740 All right,
00:59:31.320 but I think
00:59:31.700 I'm done.
00:59:32.660 YouTube, do
00:59:33.120 you have
00:59:33.240 any questions
00:59:33.680 before I
00:59:34.120 go?
00:59:35.480 Yeah, my
00:59:36.120 nose always
00:59:36.620 sounds plugged.
00:59:41.780 You sound
00:59:42.420 like I have
00:59:43.060 a permanent
00:59:43.460 allergy.
00:59:44.280 Well, that's
00:59:44.600 true.
00:59:46.160 Every now
00:59:46.820 and then,
00:59:47.320 maybe one
00:59:47.940 out of
00:59:48.200 20 times,
00:59:49.680 my head is
00:59:50.580 clear from
00:59:51.100 allergies.
00:59:52.220 It does
00:59:52.580 sound very
00:59:52.980 different.
00:59:55.140 I sound
00:59:55.780 good for
00:59:56.100 75.
00:59:57.480 All right.
00:59:58.500 YouTube,
00:59:59.120 thanks for
00:59:59.580 joining.
01:00:00.420 Let's wait
01:00:00.860 and find out
01:00:01.300 what's happening
01:00:01.880 with this
01:00:02.360 Mar-a-Lago
01:00:02.980 stuff and
01:00:03.420 we'll talk
01:00:03.760 to you
01:00:03.940 tomorrow.