Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1830 Scott Adams： FBI Raids Trumps Mar-a-Lago Home And That Means Trouble...For Everyone

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:11.600 Was there any news yesterday? Yes, there was. There was.

00:00:16.740 And you came to the right place, because everybody else is talking about it all wrong.

00:00:22.500 But we're going to do it right.

00:00:23.760 And all you need to enjoy this experience is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice,

00:00:30.920 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:33.920 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:37.340 I like coffee.

00:00:39.040 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,

00:00:44.260 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:47.080 It's called a simultaneous sip.

00:00:49.740 And it happens now. Go!

00:00:53.760 Ah, tastes like freedom.

00:01:01.220 Let's keep that alive.

00:01:05.360 Well, we'll get to the big story, of course.

00:01:08.240 But I just had to make this announcement

00:01:10.920 that I'm going to start blocking anybody who tries to vax-splain to me. 0.90

00:01:18.840 Here's what you get blocked for.

00:01:20.420 Scott, don't you know that the vaccinations that you call shots are not really vaccinations

00:01:28.500 because they don't prevent you from getting it?

00:01:31.840 Blocked.

00:01:33.040 You're right.

00:01:34.680 But how many times do you have to tell me what everybody knows?

00:01:38.220 If you just tell me the same thing everybody knows,

00:01:41.840 do you assume I'm the last person in the world to find out that the vaccinations,

00:01:45.800 so-called, don't actually block transmission?

00:01:48.840 No, no, I actually know it.

00:01:51.980 And every time you mention it again, I'm going to block you.

00:01:55.800 Please don't do it.

00:01:57.340 Just please stop saying it.

00:01:58.800 It's the soil and green of the pandemic.

00:02:03.300 All right, well, I don't know if you heard, but Trump's Mar-a-Lago home got raided by the FBI.

00:02:09.380 Don't call it a raid, the Democrats say.

00:02:12.940 It's no raid.

00:02:14.640 It's just people showing up unexpectedly at 4 a.m. with guns and asking for access to your house.

00:02:20.240 But not a raid.

00:02:21.780 No, no, no, no.

00:02:22.680 It's serving a warrant.

00:02:24.760 The Democrats would have you believe.

00:02:26.440 There's nothing raid-like about that whatsoever.

00:02:30.560 Just the legal process working exactly the way it's supposed to.

00:02:33.920 My take is that Trump just won the black vote for 2024 because every time he seems unfairly targeted by law enforcement,

00:02:45.980 I feel like there's a little bell that rings inside the head of everybody who feels like maybe they have also been unfairly targeted by law enforcement.

00:02:56.560 If you're going to bond over something, bonding over being unfairly treated by law enforcement is a real good way to go.

00:03:09.140 The best part about this is that Trump backed prison reform.

00:03:16.620 Trump worked hard and sacrificed quite a bit of his political capital, I would argue,

00:03:22.200 to get a lot of black people out of jail sooner than they would have. 0.58

00:03:27.260 Now, it wasn't just for black people, of course, but since they're disproportionately affected by the justice system.

00:03:34.560 So here is Trump, who, to his credit, I would say, because I was in favor of it,

00:03:41.140 did a great deal to reduce the amount of jail time that black people were experiencing in the United States.

00:03:48.240 And now he has, it looks like, we don't know what the justification is yet.

00:03:55.240 We may be surprised.

00:03:56.940 Maybe they have something.

00:03:58.780 Maybe this time the walls really are closing in on Trump.

00:04:01.980 Maybe it's really worse than Watergate for the first time.

00:04:05.640 Maybe.

00:04:06.780 Maybe.

00:04:07.680 Anything's possible.

00:04:08.920 But I think if you look at it, it kind of looks like they don't have anything.

00:04:13.060 Because I feel like we would have heard about it.

00:04:16.140 If it were anything big.

00:04:18.240 But, yeah, so certainly the voters are going to have some reaction to this,

00:04:25.340 but there's more to learn.

00:04:28.520 Because I think our opinion won't be finalized until we find out what the warrant is about.

00:04:38.280 Does it feel to you that...

00:04:40.420 Let me just tell you how it feels.

00:04:42.060 So the next is just literally just how it feels.

00:04:47.160 So there's no factual basis to the next thing I'm going to say.

00:04:52.380 It feels like the FBI is protecting itself from Trump.

00:04:58.080 Am I wrong?

00:04:59.880 It feels like they're protecting themselves.

00:05:01.760 It doesn't feel like this was for the country.

00:05:03.480 Because I can't think of anything that I felt threatened by

00:05:07.660 by knowing that the president who has full clearance for any kind of information,

00:05:15.200 an ex-president who has complete security clearance,

00:05:18.340 if somebody with complete security clearance has some documents

00:05:21.880 that probably we have copies of,

00:05:25.100 let me ask you this.

00:05:28.960 How many documents make it into the White House

00:05:31.360 that are not digitally recorded before they're handed to the president?

00:05:36.920 Do they only record it after the president touches it?

00:05:40.640 And then what happens to it when he's done?

00:05:42.260 He sets it on the desk or whatever.

00:05:44.460 Does somebody just say,

00:05:45.340 well, there's a document we don't have to do anything with?

00:05:48.940 Or do they just scan everything?

00:05:52.880 Don't you assume it all exists in a scanned form?

00:05:57.100 What kind of documents exactly is he taking home

00:05:59.660 from the White House

00:06:01.480 that are not recorded in some form in another place?

00:06:07.120 I guess I have some questions about the process.

00:06:09.700 Well, to me, it looks like the FBI is trying to avoid Trump

00:06:16.140 looking into their own behavior.

00:06:18.580 It's what it feels like.

00:06:20.180 I have no proof of that.

00:06:22.340 Can't read any minds.

00:06:23.840 But it feels like it.

00:06:25.100 As a citizen of the United States,

00:06:27.140 it's just how it makes me feel.

00:06:28.600 It makes me more likely to want to vote.

00:06:31.560 And I don't vote.

00:06:33.300 That's a long story.

00:06:34.480 You know why.

00:06:35.880 But this makes even me want to vote.

00:06:38.040 And that's a pretty high bar.

00:06:41.020 But again, we're reacting on incomplete information.

00:06:46.580 Now, what the Democrats are trying to sell us,

00:06:50.780 and even David Axelrod came at us with this.

00:06:56.900 So this is a David Axelrod tweet.

00:06:59.220 And because it came from him,

00:07:01.140 it means a little bit more.

00:07:02.340 I'll tell you why.

00:07:03.480 He tweeted,

00:07:04.120 One thing is very clear.

00:07:05.780 However, Garland, the Attorney General,

00:07:08.620 Garland would not have authorized this raid,

00:07:11.300 and no federal judge would have signed off on it

00:07:13.880 if there weren't significant evidence to warrant it.

00:07:18.460 To which I say,

00:07:20.200 What?

00:07:21.160 What kind of a country do we live in

00:07:24.280 that anybody would even say this in public?

00:07:28.580 Have we not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt

00:07:31.220 that the FBI would, in fact,

00:07:34.240 falsify information to the court?

00:07:38.720 We don't have to wonder if that's true.

00:07:41.940 Somebody's going to jail for it, right?

00:07:44.140 Or has pled guilty to it.

00:07:46.040 We have a guilty plea

00:07:47.040 that this exact behavior,

00:07:50.680 faking a reason for action,

00:07:54.900 and in the same domain.

00:07:56.600 It's not even a different domain.

00:07:58.140 It's Trump.

00:07:58.840 So we know that they will falsify information

00:08:02.640 to make Trump look bad.

00:08:05.100 The very organization,

00:08:07.220 oh, let's say the Department of Justice plus the FBI,

00:08:10.320 I'm going to lump them together for this conversation.

00:08:15.540 But here's what's interesting.

00:08:17.620 In my opinion,

00:08:19.000 Axelrod is one of the Democrats

00:08:22.000 who's least likely to directly lie to you.

00:08:25.660 Now, of course, he's, you know,

00:08:28.060 on Team Democrat, solidly.

00:08:30.080 So he's going to give you the Democrat spin on everything.

00:08:33.520 But I can't think of a time when he's lied directly.

00:08:37.620 He's one of the higher credibility Democrats

00:08:40.600 who, you know, sells his point of view,

00:08:43.420 and you know it's a point of view.

00:08:46.260 Do you have evidence of something he did

00:08:48.880 that was as bad as this tweet?

00:08:51.700 And so he's sort of like an indicator for me.

00:08:57.320 There's some people on the political left

00:08:59.980 who have more credibility than others.

00:09:03.500 And I think he has more credibility

00:09:05.080 than most of the people on the left

00:09:06.960 because he's more transparent about being on a team

00:09:09.740 and he says things that don't sound that crazy.

00:09:13.340 So to me, that's pretty credible.

00:09:15.180 You know, fully transparent.

00:09:16.460 I'm on this team.

00:09:18.040 Here's my opinion.

00:09:19.300 Okay, I get that.

00:09:20.100 But this seems to be a departure

00:09:23.580 from what I have noticed of his pattern.

00:09:27.500 Now, that's only based on what I've noticed,

00:09:29.160 so there's a gap in that.

00:09:31.560 But it feels like he's completely bought off

00:09:35.840 on selling this perspective that's clearly ridiculous.

00:09:43.720 This is the first time I've seen him try to sell

00:09:46.340 a perspective that's obviously and clearly ridiculous.

00:09:49.820 Now, if you're going to respond to something

00:09:53.860 that's obviously and clearly ridiculous,

00:09:56.300 what is the persuasion method most effective?

00:10:01.700 What would be the persuasion technique,

00:10:04.620 which I've taught you many times by different...

00:10:07.580 Well, mocking.

00:10:08.660 Mocking is good.

00:10:09.520 But I think mocking has lost a lot of its importance.

00:10:15.640 Mocking in the political field doesn't really work.

00:10:19.820 Mocking in the corporate world works really well.

00:10:23.100 Let me make that distinction.

00:10:24.320 That's important.

00:10:25.720 Mockery is brutally effective in the corporate world.

00:10:30.160 Brutally effective.

00:10:31.740 Nobody wants to get mocked in the corporate world.

00:10:34.300 In politics, it's just the atmosphere.

00:10:38.040 I mean, mocking each other is literally all that's going on.

00:10:42.020 There's nothing but it.

00:10:43.100 So it doesn't really have any power in politics.

00:10:45.600 So I would say that responding to a ridiculous point of view

00:10:48.940 with mockery just doesn't work in politics.

00:10:52.880 It's fun.

00:10:53.860 I do it all the time.

00:10:55.380 It could be entertaining for your base,

00:10:57.120 but there's no persuasion element to it.

00:11:02.340 Agree and amplify?

00:11:03.440 No.

00:11:06.120 No, there's a cleaner way.

00:11:07.740 It's called the high ground.

00:11:10.700 So here's my response to the David Axelrod tweet.

00:11:14.540 He got tens of thousands of responses,

00:11:17.080 so he's not going to see mine.

00:11:18.820 But here's the high ground approach.

00:11:23.940 So when he says there must be significant evidence

00:11:28.140 to validate the warrant,

00:11:30.960 I say this.

00:11:32.100 I said this point by David Axelrod might have been valid 10 years ago.

00:11:38.360 Today, anyone not zombified by fake news assumes an FBI raid on a Republican

00:11:43.380 is probably illegitimate,

00:11:45.840 because the pattern is hard to miss.

00:11:47.920 That's the high ground.

00:11:50.660 The high ground is, well, you're absolutely right 10 years ago.

00:11:56.840 If I just said everything you're saying is ridiculous,

00:12:00.240 that just sounds like somebody disagreeing, just to disagree.

00:12:04.060 But if you say your point of view was absolutely valid 10 years ago,

00:12:08.840 but it ignores our recent history in which the FBI has shown that they can't be trusted

00:12:13.600 on exactly this question of, do you have a good reason to act?

00:12:17.900 This exact question has been, you know, proven to us publicly and without any doubt,

00:12:24.160 this is something we have to worry about.

00:12:26.980 So the fact that David Axelrod would live through the last several years

00:12:30.540 and would say without any hedging that if the FBI is acting on a warrant,

00:12:37.200 there must be significant evidence for it.

00:12:40.840 And everything suggests that that's just not true.

00:12:44.400 Now, if I just said, well, you're full of shit and you're lying,

00:12:47.840 that has no effect.

00:12:49.880 But if you say, yeah, you were right 10 years ago, that's the way it used to be.

00:12:54.900 You've really accepted the point of view, but you've infantilized them at the same time.

00:13:00.800 So that's basically what I did with his point of view.

00:13:04.660 I infantilized it.

00:13:05.940 I basically said, well, you know, you were right as far as you went,

00:13:11.140 but the adults can go a little bit further, right?

00:13:15.080 The children can say, yes, warrants need good reasons.

00:13:19.520 That's a child's point of view.

00:13:21.400 An adult's point of view is, well, not lately.

00:13:24.720 You know, lately the pattern has been very clear and established by the courts,

00:13:29.380 or at least a legal system, because we do have somebody admitting to it, right?

00:13:34.000 There's a confession.

00:13:35.940 So that's pretty clear.

00:13:38.460 All right.

00:13:39.080 So we're going to find out today how many Americans have not heard of the Russia collusion hoax.

00:13:50.720 There are actually people who don't know that the Russia collusion thing was a hoax,

00:13:55.140 and they're weighing in on social media.

00:13:58.140 They literally don't know that that was a hoax.

00:14:00.360 They actually think, and they believe that because, what's his name, Manafort.

00:14:07.200 The Democrats have believed that because Manafort is known to have shared some internal polling information with one Russian,

00:14:17.480 for money, I guess, that therefore Russia collusion was proved.

00:14:23.360 Now, has anybody asked the question, how much national security value was internal polling information?

00:14:33.880 How in the world was that valuable, internal polling information?

00:14:42.880 Really?

00:14:43.560 What was in that internal polling information?

00:14:48.260 Wouldn't you like to know?

00:14:49.840 What do you suppose Manafort told a Russian that was useful?

00:14:54.780 That actually the Russian said, oh, it's a good thing I know that from your internal polling. 0.99

00:14:59.640 I can't even imagine anything that would have been useful.

00:15:05.800 Can you?

00:15:07.360 Like, what would be an example?

00:15:09.240 Give me any example.

00:15:10.380 Even just make one up.

00:15:11.520 Speculate.

00:15:12.780 Speculate.

00:15:13.420 What could be possibly an internal polling information that would make a difference to international security or anything?

00:15:22.760 Nothing.

00:15:23.280 The best case scenario is it might have been a heads up about, oh, you know, maybe who's going to win or something.

00:15:30.480 I don't know.

00:15:31.460 Something like that.

00:15:32.800 But even that would be sketchy.

00:15:34.640 I mean, internal polling is not exactly the most reliable stuff.

00:15:40.940 All right.

00:15:41.860 So nobody's going to ask the question, what did Manafort actually share?

00:15:47.700 Because if I were Manafort, I would have done the following.

00:15:50.600 I would have found something I could give to this Russian who would pay me money or return a favor or something later.

00:15:58.760 But I'd make sure it didn't hurt the country.

00:16:01.800 Because I'm pretty sure Manafort didn't want to hurt America.

00:16:05.460 He just wanted to make a buck.

00:16:07.680 I assume.

00:16:09.060 Because he wasn't really trying very hard to hurt America.

00:16:11.700 I didn't see any evidence of that.

00:16:13.420 Just trying to make a buck.

00:16:14.400 And I'd love to know what he thought was useful to them, but also not harmful to America.

00:16:21.500 Because that's probably what he gave them.

00:16:23.400 Just speculated.

00:16:25.640 All right.

00:16:30.760 So, God, there's so much going on about this one story.

00:16:35.100 So, Jerry Nadler, when he retweeted a New York Times headline that said Trump's Mar-a-Lago had been raided.

00:16:48.520 And Jerry Nadler responded with one word.

00:16:52.060 Good!

00:16:53.200 Exclamation mark.

00:16:54.020 Now, I understand that, you know, he's politically on a different side.

00:17:03.320 But doesn't that feel too far?

00:17:06.480 It feels too far, doesn't it?

00:17:08.380 Because as far as I know, there's not even an alleged crime.

00:17:12.180 Not even an alleged crime that would go to this level.

00:17:17.680 In other words, if it's really just some documents, you would not expect a raid.

00:17:22.520 So, what is he saying good to?

00:17:26.020 What part is good?

00:17:27.320 The fact that America doesn't know why the FBI, which has no credibility, just raided a political enemy of the current administration?

00:17:36.820 How in the world is this good?

00:17:39.060 In what world can you say in public that this is good?

00:17:42.840 Even if you thought Trump had been guilty of a crime, is this good?

00:17:47.960 And so, I would like to put a stake in the ground.

00:17:54.420 When Jerry Nadler dies of natural causes, which I'm guessing could be within the week.

00:17:59.860 I mean, if you just take a look at him, he looks like he's going to go any minute.

00:18:03.580 But when Jerry Nadler dies, I'm assuming I'm going to outlive him.

00:18:07.720 I don't know.

00:18:08.480 Maybe not.

00:18:09.380 But I'm going to make that assumption.

00:18:10.960 I'm going to outlive him.

00:18:11.780 I'm just going to tweet one word.

00:18:14.980 Good.

00:18:16.060 With exclamation.

00:18:17.000 Good.

00:18:18.140 Because I think he's proven that he's not, he's really not on Team America here.

00:18:24.480 Whatever team he's on, it's not my country.

00:18:27.520 Because in my country, if Biden's home got raided, and I didn't have an alleged crime

00:18:36.300 that I was even aware of, I would say, fuck that.

00:18:41.060 I don't care what team Biden's on.

00:18:44.140 If you send the FBI to raid him and you don't tell me why, just, you know, I hate to do this,

00:18:50.540 but sometimes you have to.

00:18:53.060 Just imagine the reverse.

00:18:54.440 Imagine Trump in office and having him investigate Biden, but let's say there was no Biden laptop.

00:19:02.640 There was nothing like that.

00:19:03.580 There was no actual specific crime.

00:19:06.360 Imagine that.

00:19:07.760 Would you be in favor of that?

00:19:10.600 Hell no.

00:19:12.220 Hell no.

00:19:13.460 If Trump had done this to Biden with, you know, equally sketchy reasons, let's say Biden

00:19:19.560 had some documents that were, you know, in question.

00:19:23.040 Let's say it's the same situation.

00:19:25.600 Hell no.

00:19:27.380 Hell no.

00:19:28.280 I would not support Trump doing that or the Trump administration doing that.

00:19:32.000 No, no, no, no.

00:19:33.840 Now, I suppose it's easy for me to say that because I'm not in that situation.

00:19:39.000 But I feel like I know myself well enough that there's no situation in which I'd be okay with

00:19:45.260 this.

00:19:45.520 Because it's the ex-president thing, right?

00:19:49.360 Even if I thought Biden had done something sketchy, I still wouldn't be in favor of it.

00:19:54.080 Because that whole don't go after your political enemies, that's a tradition that we kind of

00:20:02.140 need to keep.

00:20:04.020 Right?

00:20:04.260 Kind of need to keep that one.

00:20:05.500 And I get the whole argument of, well, it really depends how bad the accusation is that's in

00:20:13.180 the warrant that we haven't seen yet.

00:20:15.720 Well, okay.

00:20:17.420 If it turns out that there was a hostage situation at Mar-a-Lago, and the hostage was in some kind

00:20:26.700 of a container with limited air, and the oxygen was running out, and there was no time to delay,

00:20:34.980 well, yeah.

00:20:35.940 Execute the warrant, even if you're not quite sure.

00:20:38.760 Sure.

00:20:39.680 Sure.

00:20:39.940 But are we going to find out that whatever the reason that's listed on the warrant, is

00:20:46.760 that going to sound to you like a hostage running out of oxygen?

00:20:52.820 Do you think you're going to feel the urgency when you find out what this is?

00:20:56.880 I feel like the urgency might be missing.

00:21:00.100 Because these documents have been there a long time.

00:21:03.280 Now, here's the other funny part about it.

00:21:05.380 For the Democrats' point of view to be valid, you would have to accept the following.

00:21:11.720 And by the way, this is a really good persuasion tip.

00:21:15.660 And the tip goes into the category, in order to believe X, you must also believe these following

00:21:22.740 things, because they're necessary to support your belief.

00:21:26.680 All right.

00:21:27.240 So in order to believe that there's something incriminating in the documents, here's what

00:21:33.380 you'd have to believe.

00:21:34.240 That Trump took incriminating documents that everybody would expect to be incriminating,

00:21:41.980 because, you know, he took them.

00:21:44.040 He would store them where lots of people knew where they were, because obviously people at

00:21:48.120 Mar-a-Lago would know where they were stored.

00:21:51.260 And that he would have them stored in a building that's full of, and I don't know if you know

00:21:57.220 this, but Mar-a-Lago was built in the era in which they have toilets. 0.62

00:22:04.240 There are toilets all over that place. 0.79

00:22:07.000 I'm pretty sure that Trump has a toilet.

00:22:10.020 Probably the guests have at least one to share.

00:22:13.560 No, they probably have their own toilets, I'll bet you. 1.00

00:22:15.640 I'll bet you that place is just filled with toilets. 1.00

00:22:18.600 So here you have your incriminating information on pieces of paper, sitting in a building with a guy who the Democrats say would never want anybody to see what's in those documents.

00:22:33.700 And then they're sitting next to probably 25 toilets.

00:22:38.600 And we have evidence, photographic evidence, that Trump has allegedly torn up documents and put them in a toilet, because we actually saw the photos of actual documents in a toilet.

00:22:49.800 Now, do you think that Trump could have put all these things together and said, documents that would be highly incriminating to me, but I've got possession of them, I'll store them here next to my 25 toilets.

00:23:05.880 If only there were a way to get rid of the incriminating information.

00:23:11.160 If only I could come up with some way.

00:23:14.980 So that's the Democrat point of view.

00:23:18.360 The Democrat point of view is, number one, the FBI would never raid somebody on a warrant unless they had really good evidence.

00:23:30.660 That's ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous.

00:23:33.880 In 2022, that's ridiculous. Of course they would.

00:23:36.660 Because there's nothing they wouldn't do based on their recent history.

00:23:40.880 Once you understand the Russia collusion hoax, once you understand what they did, that's known.

00:23:48.940 That part is known. We're not guessing.

00:23:52.340 Once you understand that, all bets are off.

00:23:55.320 Because what exactly was worse than trying to depose or change the course of American history by making up a crime?

00:24:03.880 There's nothing worse than that.

00:24:06.240 There's nothing worse than that.

00:24:08.260 Whatever this is, is not worse than that.

00:24:12.240 It's just bad.

00:24:13.760 Not worse than that.

00:24:14.700 I'm just going to throw this story in the middle, then we'll get back to it.

00:24:26.360 So Israel and Gaza have reached a ceasefire.

00:24:30.120 And I would like to congratulate both Israel and Gaza for getting everything that they wanted out of this recent flare-up.

00:24:38.280 And I say that because the government of Israel kind of needs to have an active enemy.

00:24:45.920 Every time somebody attacks Israel, Israel gets stronger. 0.79

00:24:49.640 You know, they take a little more land.

00:24:51.800 They, you know, have to take a high ground to defend themselves, maybe keep it.

00:24:56.140 You know what I mean?

00:24:57.020 So Israel sort of needs a permanent enemy. 0.97

00:24:59.820 But the best case scenario is that it's a low-grade conflict.

00:25:04.560 And they needed to flare-up now and then to remind you.

00:25:09.220 And then they needed to go back down.

00:25:12.100 Likewise, the folks in Gaza who were firing the missiles and stuff,

00:25:17.660 they also need a flare-up of violence every now and then,

00:25:21.900 because that's how they get more funding from their sponsors.

00:25:26.140 And so this was just theater.

00:25:28.440 You know, nobody in Gaza thought they were going to conquer Israel.

00:25:31.800 Am I right?

00:25:32.300 Nobody in Gaza thought they were going to conquer Israel.

00:25:35.960 But here's the other question.

00:25:37.980 Do you think Israel couldn't completely stop this from happening if they wanted to? 0.96

00:25:42.380 Of course they could.

00:25:43.760 But it would require far more brutality than they could handle, right, reputationally.

00:25:49.300 So the very best situation is that this type of attack flares up.

00:25:55.660 It killed 43 people this time, including 15 children.

00:25:59.960 I don't know on which side.

00:26:03.440 It doesn't mention whose side they were on.

00:26:05.820 But from Israel's point of view, that was an acceptable loss, 0.96

00:26:09.400 especially since it's not all on their side.

00:26:12.720 And from the Gazans' point of view, I think it was an acceptable loss, 0.96

00:26:16.620 because they got everything they needed out of it.

00:26:19.220 I'm not even sure this needs to be news anymore.

00:26:24.680 Like, it's a weird kind of news where it's just two sides getting exactly what they want

00:26:28.980 and then going back to the status quo to wait until the next flare-up.

00:26:33.820 It's just theater.

00:26:34.680 I wouldn't even bother trying to fix that.

00:26:43.600 So, how angry are you about the Mar-a-Lago raid?

00:26:52.000 Tell me your feeling.

00:26:55.660 Did it immediately make you want to go all January 6th on this situation?

00:27:01.200 So, here's the thing I'm going to warn you about.

00:27:06.540 Don't overreact.

00:27:08.860 Don't overreact.

00:27:10.840 Because you know there's some militia right now that just got their marching orders, right?

00:27:17.040 Somewhere there's a right-leaning militia that Trump will get tagged with,

00:27:22.700 even though he doesn't even know the names, probably.

00:27:25.380 And they're firing up right now,

00:27:27.280 and they're going to use this as their justification for marching or whatever.

00:27:31.380 Now, I don't think they're going to start shooting.

00:27:33.920 I think they're just going to make another show of, you know, a show of here we are.

00:27:38.380 And then the Democrats will run that,

00:27:41.920 and they'll say not only is Trump obviously a criminal, they will say,

00:27:47.720 because look at this warrant, which we have no details about.

00:27:51.240 Well, clearly it must be a valid warrant,

00:27:54.220 because nobody would do an invalid warrant just because they have done it recently,

00:27:59.520 right in front of us.

00:28:00.860 Nobody would do that.

00:28:03.660 So, it looks like a setup.

00:28:08.840 It feels like a setup.

00:28:10.540 So, I would worry that the Democrats, at least part of the strategy,

00:28:14.820 would be to provoke an overreaction.

00:28:16.980 Because, remember, the January 6th thing completely fell apart.

00:28:21.460 They were trying to show that the Republicans are a bunch of, you know,

00:28:25.240 armed, dangerous insurrectionists,

00:28:27.760 and the entire January 6th thing just dissolved in sunlight.

00:28:32.680 In fact, the Harvard-sponsored survey

00:28:37.220 showed that the vast majority of the people attended

00:28:40.300 thought they were saving the republic.

00:28:42.580 They didn't think it was an insurrection.

00:28:44.000 They thought they were saving it from an insurrection.

00:28:46.980 That's all of evidence now.

00:28:48.860 Now we know what the crowd thought.

00:28:50.940 They were not there for an insurrection.

00:28:52.580 Most of them.

00:28:53.260 Some of them were, but, you know,

00:28:55.000 any big crowd is going to have some minority opinion in it.

00:29:00.040 And then we saw all the evidence,

00:29:01.560 and the evidence didn't seem damning of Trump at all,

00:29:04.700 you know, at least in a criminal sense.

00:29:06.560 And now, coincidentally, we get this.

00:29:12.820 Imagine what would happen if all the militias show up

00:29:16.880 and they start looking dangerous again.

00:29:20.040 Don't get suckered into this.

00:29:22.080 You know, if you know anybody in the militia,

00:29:24.680 I'm sure there's somebody in the militia who's watching this.

00:29:26.820 There's got to be at least one.

00:29:27.720 So, be a little more strategic.

00:29:32.220 Whatever your militia, you know, long-term objectives are,

00:29:37.260 I'm not saying they're good.

00:29:38.460 I'm not saying they're bad.

00:29:39.340 I don't know.

00:29:40.280 I have no idea what they are.

00:29:41.700 Probably lots of different ones.

00:29:44.800 But just be cool for a little bit.

00:29:46.880 Just be cool for a little bit.

00:29:48.160 Because you don't want to make a big show

00:29:50.820 that's exactly what they want.

00:29:53.640 So, just wait.

00:29:56.760 Now, what do you think they're actually going to come up with

00:30:00.660 as their explanation for the warrant?

00:30:04.240 And by the way, do we ever find out?

00:30:07.420 How does the process work?

00:30:10.200 Because at some point,

00:30:12.080 Trump himself has to find out what it's about, right?

00:30:14.580 Is that not part of the process?

00:30:18.740 The person who's targeted has to hear what the charge is.

00:30:23.180 Am I wrong?

00:30:26.980 The warrant should say.

00:30:28.820 And when the warrant is served,

00:30:30.540 somebody reads it, right?

00:30:31.960 On the receiving end.

00:30:33.220 So, are you...

00:30:34.380 Okay, now I have a big question.

00:30:36.480 Are you telling me that somebody at Mar-a-Lago

00:30:38.640 got a search warrant and read it

00:30:42.320 and it said why they were there

00:30:45.120 and we don't know that yet?

00:30:48.660 Really?

00:30:49.660 There's somebody at Mar-a-Lago

00:30:50.860 who actually read the warrant

00:30:52.260 because they had to let him in, right?

00:30:54.960 It's a sealed warrant, somebody says.

00:30:58.980 It would be initially sealed.

00:31:00.520 So, are you telling me that the FBI can come to your house?

00:31:04.220 I guess you are telling me this.

00:31:05.800 And they can say,

00:31:07.100 I have a secret document you can't see

00:31:09.060 that says I can search your house

00:31:10.820 and you're not even accused of a crime.

00:31:13.360 That's actually the process.

00:31:18.160 Seriously?

00:31:21.360 Seriously?

00:31:26.680 I'm not going to take that as a fact.

00:31:30.340 I feel like there must be some nuance on that.

00:31:32.800 There's enough people saying no.

00:31:35.640 A no-knock warrant.

00:31:36.920 Yeah, they did have no-knock warrants,

00:31:39.780 so that would suggest that it was legal at one point.

00:31:43.740 But the no-knock part had more to do with avoiding violence.

00:31:46.920 That's sort of a different situation.

00:31:49.240 The warrant has to be served.

00:31:50.860 But how can it be sealed and served?

00:31:56.080 Does that mean...

00:31:57.640 Are you telling me that the target of the warrant

00:31:59.380 is not told why they're searching?

00:32:02.540 Literally.

00:32:04.160 The indictment is sealed, not the warrant.

00:32:06.080 Okay, that makes more sense.

00:32:07.680 I feel like we're all bad lawyers trying to figure this out.

00:32:11.440 If anybody here is actually an attorney,

00:32:15.280 could you put that in your comment?

00:32:16.900 You know, like,

00:32:18.040 I'm a lawyer, comma.

00:32:21.260 Here's what's true.

00:32:23.200 That would help a lot.

00:32:25.120 Because the rest of us are just guessing.

00:32:28.280 They don't have to show you the details until later.

00:32:32.140 So somebody is saying they can say,

00:32:34.360 we're here for these documents, for example,

00:32:37.420 but they don't have to say,

00:32:39.000 because the documents might say X, Y, or Z.

00:32:43.060 Yeah, well, let's watch Barnes and Fry talk about this.

00:32:48.360 They'll be better.

00:32:50.860 The warrant, oh, the lawyer says,

00:32:52.720 the warrant describes the premises to be searched.

00:32:54.980 Okay, thank you.

00:32:56.800 So from an actual lawyer,

00:32:58.520 the warrant describes the premise.

00:33:00.860 It doesn't describe the crime or alleged crime.

00:33:04.700 Now, I guess you could have a warrant to search somebody

00:33:09.260 who's not accused of a crime, correct?

00:33:13.200 Because you could be searching a confederate's house 0.69

00:33:15.680 or a family member's house.

00:33:17.720 So you don't have to be accused of a crime

00:33:19.760 to be served the warrant.

00:33:22.640 Okay.

00:33:22.900 So that does suggest that the person

00:33:25.440 whose home is being searched

00:33:26.900 doesn't have to know the topic.

00:33:28.840 They just have to know that the warrant

00:33:30.640 describes what will be searched.

00:33:34.800 That sounds right.

00:33:36.260 I'm going to act like that's right

00:33:37.640 because it sounds right.

00:33:38.620 They search for evidence

00:33:43.560 so they can accuse you of crime, right?

00:33:45.260 But they have to have some reason

00:33:46.620 to suspect there's something there.

00:33:50.780 Where was Melania?

00:33:52.240 I don't know.

00:33:52.820 That's a good question.

00:33:53.960 Yeah, was Melania with Trump?

00:33:56.000 Why didn't they report that?

00:33:57.100 Now, as Jack Posobiec reminds us on Twitter,

00:34:03.380 the big risk here is if Trump is,

00:34:07.480 I don't know if indicted is enough,

00:34:09.400 but if he's found guilty

00:34:10.780 of doing some kind of a document of destruction crime,

00:34:15.240 he would be ineligible to hold office.

00:34:18.360 And it looks like that might be the play.

00:34:21.200 But they don't have to get that exactly.

00:34:23.200 They can just smear him until Election Day.

00:34:27.100 Yeah.

00:34:32.760 All right.

00:34:38.120 Where were the security people?

00:34:41.260 Yeah.

00:34:42.560 Now, the security people presumably

00:34:45.640 looked at the warrant

00:34:47.500 or listened to somebody who looked at the warrant

00:34:50.340 and decided that they would step aside.

00:34:53.200 But it does make you wonder

00:34:56.440 what their job description is.

00:35:02.020 All right.

00:35:03.840 This is going to drag out for years.

00:35:06.680 So do you think that the real play

00:35:08.420 is just to put Trump in legal jeopardy

00:35:11.900 at the same time he's trying to run for re-election?

00:35:14.840 Is it called re-election

00:35:18.700 if there's a term in between years?

00:35:27.900 Yeah, it's creating some friction.

00:35:29.640 Exactly.

00:35:31.100 Well,

00:35:32.460 does it seem to you

00:35:35.420 that this would backfire?

00:35:37.420 If you were a Democrat,

00:35:39.780 would you think that

00:35:40.900 indicting Trump

00:35:42.640 would make people

00:35:44.300 less likely to vote for you?

00:35:48.020 I don't think so.

00:35:50.880 I think that Republicans

00:35:52.680 would be more likely.

00:35:54.480 Because remember,

00:35:55.200 Republicans just watched

00:35:56.200 the whole January 6th thing play out.

00:35:58.460 And to Republicans,

00:35:59.460 it looked like people

00:36:00.840 who look like them

00:36:01.920 and think like them

00:36:03.640 were being rounded up and jailed.

00:36:05.380 And now the leader

00:36:07.060 of the people

00:36:07.720 who look like them

00:36:08.520 and think like them

00:36:09.360 looks like he's being targeted,

00:36:12.100 they would say, unfairly.

00:36:14.840 I feel like,

00:36:16.240 I feel like this would

00:36:18.220 vastly increase

00:36:21.100 the number of people who voted.

00:36:25.400 So here's my hypothesis.

00:36:29.960 There are two possibilities,

00:36:32.600 I think,

00:36:33.520 that is suggested

00:36:34.360 by this whole situation.

00:36:36.000 And they're opposites,

00:36:37.040 which is interesting.

00:36:38.520 One possibility

00:36:39.320 is that they really

00:36:40.160 do have something on Trump.

00:36:41.820 And it's good.

00:36:43.120 I mean,

00:36:43.480 from their point of view.

00:36:44.420 From the Jerry Nadler

00:36:45.800 point of view,

00:36:46.300 it would be good.

00:36:47.960 So that's one possibility.

00:36:49.400 They have the goods,

00:36:50.820 but they need these documents

00:36:52.400 to really seal the deal.

00:36:55.220 That's one possibility.

00:36:56.920 The other possibility

00:36:58.100 is desperation.

00:37:00.220 The other possibility

00:37:01.080 is that they know

00:37:01.840 they don't have anything

00:37:02.700 and nobody has anything.

00:37:03.820 That all of the various

00:37:05.460 walls are closing in

00:37:07.240 theories

00:37:09.100 have all turned to dust.

00:37:11.540 And they watched

00:37:12.260 the January 6th thing

00:37:13.320 turn to complete crap

00:37:14.440 right in front of them.

00:37:15.800 It could be

00:37:16.800 that they're so afraid

00:37:18.400 of Trump getting the power

00:37:20.000 to hire a special prosecutor

00:37:24.240 that they can't take the chance.

00:37:28.140 Because once the Trump

00:37:29.260 administration gets in there,

00:37:30.680 one assumes,

00:37:32.000 they're going to look into

00:37:33.200 the Bidens' association

00:37:34.880 with Ukraine.

00:37:39.060 And they're going to be

00:37:39.900 looking at a lot of stuff

00:37:40.980 that maybe wasn't

00:37:41.760 being looked at.

00:37:42.700 You know,

00:37:42.880 the Hunter laptop stuff.

00:37:45.280 And so I've got a feeling

00:37:46.360 that this is

00:37:47.180 a desperate attempt

00:37:49.140 to try to keep

00:37:50.520 the Bidens out of jail

00:37:51.720 and people associated

00:37:53.320 with them.

00:37:54.440 It looks to me

00:37:55.620 like desperation.

00:37:59.440 Because under the scenario

00:38:01.840 that they really have

00:38:02.940 something real

00:38:03.680 and that just finding

00:38:05.300 something at Mar-a-Lago

00:38:07.320 would be the final thing,

00:38:08.880 what are the odds of that?

00:38:11.200 I mean,

00:38:11.760 as I talked about before,

00:38:12.960 what are the odds

00:38:13.820 that Trump would keep

00:38:15.560 something incriminating

00:38:16.860 on a piece of paper?

00:38:18.580 I don't know if I've mentioned,

00:38:21.000 but paper is easy to destroy.

00:38:23.040 You could flush it.

00:38:24.780 Yeah,

00:38:25.080 you could flush it.

00:38:27.980 So it seems deeply unlikely

00:38:29.640 that there's something

00:38:30.420 in there that's incriminating.

00:38:32.480 It's more likely

00:38:33.520 that he wanted

00:38:34.140 to keep some things,

00:38:35.640 you know,

00:38:35.840 maybe embarrassing,

00:38:37.560 but that's not a crime.

00:38:42.340 I'm going to tell

00:38:43.100 the locals' people

00:38:44.680 some stuff

00:38:46.340 after I turn off YouTube

00:38:47.740 in a little bit.

00:38:49.120 I give them

00:38:49.680 the behind-the-curdon stuff

00:38:50.940 that I can't say

00:38:51.800 in a more public way.

00:38:54.840 So there is something fun

00:38:56.440 about this story

00:38:57.180 that nobody's mentioned yet.

00:38:58.540 So I'll mention that

00:38:59.260 just to the locals' people

00:39:00.240 later.

00:39:01.600 So stay tuned for that.

00:39:04.480 All right.

00:39:06.760 So those are

00:39:07.480 your two possibilities.

00:39:09.160 Which one seems

00:39:10.100 more likely?

00:39:12.680 Does it seem likely

00:39:13.900 that the Democrats

00:39:16.280 would have some kind

00:39:17.660 of allegation

00:39:18.580 that's so strong

00:39:20.260 that Trump would be

00:39:20.980 in actual legal danger,

00:39:22.800 and yet that allegation

00:39:23.800 would be so strong

00:39:24.960 that they need

00:39:26.840 these documents

00:39:27.680 that are in Mar-a-Lago

00:39:28.740 to make the case?

00:39:32.440 Do you think

00:39:33.180 that's likely?

00:39:34.840 Do you think

00:39:35.380 it's likely

00:39:35.960 that something

00:39:36.480 in his possession

00:39:37.400 would make their case?

00:39:39.740 I feel like

00:39:40.740 that's the least likely

00:39:41.820 thing in the world.

00:39:44.120 I mean,

00:39:44.360 it just feels

00:39:44.800 ridiculously unlikely.

00:39:46.440 Possible.

00:39:47.760 Possible.

00:39:49.120 But ridiculously unlikely.

00:39:54.420 All right.

00:39:55.120 So to me,

00:39:55.620 it looks political.

00:39:56.940 So it looks political

00:39:58.360 based on the history

00:39:59.300 of the FBI,

00:40:01.100 the fact that

00:40:01.740 there was no larger

00:40:03.880 allegation

00:40:04.740 that this is

00:40:06.040 obviously tied to,

00:40:07.080 the timing of it,

00:40:10.560 and the way

00:40:12.460 it was done.

00:40:14.240 Every single thing

00:40:15.300 about this

00:40:15.800 screams fraud

00:40:16.900 and corruption.

00:40:20.380 Every part of it.

00:40:22.000 Now here's the thing.

00:40:23.580 If you're a citizen

00:40:24.620 of the United States

00:40:25.420 and you're accused

00:40:26.320 of something,

00:40:27.040 what is the standard

00:40:28.040 to which we hold you?

00:40:30.900 Everybody?

00:40:32.160 What is the standard

00:40:33.080 when somebody

00:40:33.860 who is an American citizen

00:40:35.040 is accused of a crime?

00:40:37.080 The standard is

00:40:38.380 innocent

00:40:40.380 until proven guilty.

00:40:42.760 And we all agree

00:40:43.580 with that, right?

00:40:44.720 Like that's one thing

00:40:45.720 every American

00:40:46.680 is going to say,

00:40:47.180 yeah, okay.

00:40:48.500 We can disagree a lot,

00:40:50.520 but innocent

00:40:51.800 until proven guilty,

00:40:53.460 that's a bottom line.

00:40:55.460 That is a bottom line

00:40:57.140 American principle.

00:40:58.500 You don't play

00:40:59.800 with that one.

00:41:01.040 All right.

00:41:01.860 Now,

00:41:02.660 that's how we treat

00:41:03.580 citizens.

00:41:04.040 How do we treat

00:41:06.020 government organizations?

00:41:08.160 Remember,

00:41:08.560 an organization

00:41:09.040 is not a person.

00:41:11.120 Organizations don't have

00:41:12.540 constitutional rights.

00:41:14.040 People do.

00:41:15.520 So what should be

00:41:16.500 your guiding assumption

00:41:17.840 about the guilt

00:41:19.340 of the FBI

00:41:20.120 in this case?

00:41:22.460 It should be guilty.

00:41:24.540 Your starting assumption

00:41:25.560 should be guilty.

00:41:26.940 And you can be forgiven

00:41:28.320 for that.

00:41:29.540 You can be forgiven.

00:41:30.620 Now,

00:41:31.780 if the FBI

00:41:32.340 had a spotless record

00:41:33.940 up to this point,

00:41:35.680 they still need

00:41:37.380 to make their argument.

00:41:39.980 They still got to

00:41:41.040 make a good case,

00:41:42.240 and they haven't done that.

00:41:44.160 I mean,

00:41:44.420 maybe they will.

00:41:45.680 Anything could happen.

00:41:47.240 But you have to assume

00:41:48.360 that the FBI

00:41:49.300 is guilty

00:41:49.980 unless they prove

00:41:51.100 otherwise.

00:41:52.680 So your best

00:41:55.280 citizen,

00:41:56.960 positive,

00:41:58.360 protect-the-republic

00:42:00.640 point of view

00:42:01.400 is that the FBI

00:42:02.760 is corrupt

00:42:03.560 in this specific case.

00:42:06.520 That's the best thing

00:42:07.620 you could assume

00:42:08.220 as a citizen.

00:42:08.880 It's the thing

00:42:10.060 that protects

00:42:10.640 the system the best.

00:42:12.520 If you want to

00:42:13.360 protect the American

00:42:14.220 system,

00:42:15.340 you should start

00:42:16.220 with a solid assumption

00:42:17.520 that the FBI

00:42:18.260 is corrupt

00:42:18.980 in this case

00:42:20.480 in particular,

00:42:22.000 based on pattern

00:42:23.440 in history.

00:42:23.920 they need to

00:42:25.840 prove the fuck

00:42:26.800 out of that

00:42:27.460 if they want

00:42:28.620 to change my mind.

00:42:30.280 Do you know

00:42:30.680 how hard it's going

00:42:31.300 to be to change

00:42:31.860 my mind

00:42:32.480 that this was

00:42:33.440 anything but

00:42:34.000 a political thing?

00:42:36.380 Very hard.

00:42:37.780 They're going to

00:42:38.280 have to prove it

00:42:38.940 beyond reasonable doubt,

00:42:40.760 and they're going

00:42:42.000 to have to try hard.

00:42:43.640 And if we don't

00:42:44.840 hold them to that

00:42:45.660 standard,

00:42:46.920 I'm not sure

00:42:48.220 we should expect

00:42:49.900 that our standard

00:42:50.760 will be held to either.

00:42:51.860 or the innocent

00:42:53.080 until proven guilty,

00:42:54.200 the thing you like,

00:42:55.420 I don't know

00:42:56.080 if that can hold up

00:42:56.860 either.

00:42:58.080 If you let the FBI

00:42:59.420 get away with

00:43:00.440 innocent until proven

00:43:01.640 guilty when it's

00:43:02.660 obvious they don't

00:43:03.920 play that way,

00:43:05.400 they play guilty.

00:43:08.000 We know that.

00:43:08.880 That's not a question.

00:43:11.720 So the best,

00:43:14.720 wisest,

00:43:16.260 most practical,

00:43:18.280 most useful

00:43:19.220 starting point of view

00:43:20.300 is that the FBI

00:43:21.920 is guilty

00:43:22.540 in this case,

00:43:23.540 and they'd better

00:43:24.280 prove otherwise.

00:43:25.580 And I'll wait.

00:43:27.060 So I think,

00:43:31.180 you know,

00:43:31.420 I tweeted yesterday,

00:43:32.280 I'll give my government

00:43:33.020 48 hours,

00:43:34.680 because I think

00:43:35.340 48 hours is enough

00:43:37.320 that the fog of war

00:43:38.680 situation will calm

00:43:39.820 down a little bit.

00:43:40.980 And then after 48 hours,

00:43:42.560 people said,

00:43:43.440 well,

00:43:43.740 what then,

00:43:44.240 cartoon boy?

00:43:45.460 What are you going to do?

00:43:46.860 Make a witty cartoon

00:43:49.640 about it?

00:43:50.820 No,

00:43:51.260 I'm not threatening.

00:43:52.640 I'm saying that

00:43:53.280 after 48 hours,

00:43:54.320 I'll form an opinion.

00:43:56.720 Does that sound radical?

00:43:59.040 That I'm going to wait

00:44:00.080 until I know enough

00:44:01.680 about this situation

00:44:02.700 to form an opinion.

00:44:05.100 I didn't tell you

00:44:05.720 what the opinion

00:44:06.200 is going to be.

00:44:07.520 If I told you

00:44:08.140 what,

00:44:08.520 if I told you

00:44:09.560 it was a threat,

00:44:11.540 as in,

00:44:12.360 you know,

00:44:12.540 if this happens,

00:44:13.600 I'll do something,

00:44:14.600 I don't know what.

00:44:16.260 It's not a threat.

00:44:17.220 I'm just telling you

00:44:19.040 what's the minimum

00:44:19.640 I need to form an opinion.

00:44:21.460 I need some information,

00:44:23.240 you know,

00:44:23.460 beyond the fog of war.

00:44:24.740 I need some actual

00:44:25.780 useful information.

00:44:27.420 So when I get that,

00:44:28.520 I'm going to form an opinion.

00:44:29.900 But I'm definitely

00:44:30.460 not going to form one yet.

00:44:32.440 At this point,

00:44:33.240 we have questions.

00:44:35.160 We have speculation.

00:44:37.060 We have a complete

00:44:38.840 lack of trust

00:44:39.680 in our institutions.

00:44:41.200 But that's earned.

00:44:43.400 So we don't need

00:44:44.220 to change that.

00:44:46.620 Erica says,

00:44:47.460 you sit on the fence.

00:44:48.980 Do I?

00:44:50.380 Erica?

00:44:52.700 Am I sitting on the fence?

00:44:55.700 Or am I waiting

00:44:57.380 to find out

00:44:58.080 what's actually happening?

00:45:00.320 I'm not sure

00:45:00.980 that's the same.

00:45:02.760 Because one of them

00:45:03.400 is Erica.

00:45:07.400 All right,

00:45:07.700 here I'm talking

00:45:08.500 to the fake Erica.

00:45:10.760 You know,

00:45:11.140 apparently there's

00:45:12.040 more than one Erica

00:45:12.840 in the situation here.

00:45:15.220 So we've got one Erica

00:45:16.440 on the locals' platform.

00:45:18.080 But we're not talking

00:45:18.980 about that Erica.

00:45:21.580 We're talking about

00:45:22.500 all capital letters Erica

00:45:23.860 over here on YouTube.

00:45:26.140 Dark Erica.

00:45:29.000 Yeah,

00:45:29.300 have you heard

00:45:29.560 that the Democrats

00:45:30.880 are calling Biden

00:45:31.720 dark Brandon?

00:45:33.280 They're trying to take

00:45:34.280 advantage of the

00:45:35.000 negative labeling.

00:45:36.880 It's not working.

00:45:40.940 All right.

00:45:41.580 Do I think

00:45:45.600 the queens

00:45:46.120 of drilling

00:45:46.680 dry holes

00:45:48.080 finally hit oil?

00:45:49.820 Probably not.

00:45:59.960 All right.

00:46:04.920 Giving the benefit

00:46:05.920 of a doubt.

00:46:06.400 Did I just do that?

00:46:10.820 Did I just give

00:46:11.440 the FBI

00:46:11.940 the benefit

00:46:12.540 of a doubt

00:46:13.160 while saying

00:46:14.340 they couldn't

00:46:14.780 be trusted?

00:46:15.520 That's what

00:46:15.800 somebody on YouTube

00:46:16.440 says.

00:46:17.680 No.

00:46:18.840 I'm not giving

00:46:19.600 anybody the benefit

00:46:20.380 of a doubt.

00:46:22.080 I'm saying

00:46:22.760 that I'll know

00:46:23.400 more tomorrow.

00:46:25.380 How is that

00:46:26.100 even provocative?

00:46:28.960 The most reasonable

00:46:30.160 opinion in the world

00:46:31.020 is,

00:46:31.500 huh,

00:46:32.200 maybe I'll wait

00:46:32.820 and hear what

00:46:33.240 this warrants

00:46:33.740 all about

00:46:34.140 before I make

00:46:34.720 an opinion.

00:46:35.040 Because what

00:46:37.180 if they come

00:46:37.620 up with

00:46:38.120 there was a

00:46:40.000 hostage

00:46:40.420 or some

00:46:41.360 damn thing?

00:46:42.080 Anything

00:46:42.400 could happen.

00:46:44.120 And remember,

00:46:45.160 there's a chance

00:46:46.140 that this is

00:46:47.240 all a trick.

00:46:49.160 One possibility

00:46:50.280 is that Trump

00:46:52.120 knew there was

00:46:53.420 nothing there

00:46:53.980 but he baited

00:46:55.060 them into

00:46:55.480 raiding him

00:46:56.000 to get these

00:46:56.540 documents.

00:46:58.080 Maybe.

00:46:59.060 He may have

00:47:00.080 tricked them

00:47:00.960 into thinking

00:47:01.480 there was

00:47:01.840 something there

00:47:02.360 that they needed

00:47:03.020 so that there

00:47:03.580 would be

00:47:03.800 a raid

00:47:04.220 which would

00:47:05.680 be amazingly

00:47:06.620 clever. 0.51

00:47:08.180 But,

00:47:08.560 you know,

00:47:08.800 I don't assume

00:47:09.400 that's true.

00:47:10.460 I think that

00:47:11.040 would be a little

00:47:11.500 too clever.

00:47:13.000 But you can't

00:47:13.660 rule it out.

00:47:14.600 We're at the

00:47:15.200 point where

00:47:15.680 nothing can be

00:47:16.360 ruled out

00:47:16.800 at this point.

00:47:17.280 Yeah, I don't

00:47:25.000 think it's

00:47:25.400 3D chess

00:47:26.100 but can't

00:47:26.760 rule it

00:47:27.040 out.

00:47:35.060 I agree

00:47:36.740 with what

00:47:37.100 you're saying.

00:47:38.560 Somebody at

00:47:39.200 Locals was

00:47:39.720 saying it's

00:47:40.660 so hard to

00:47:41.520 be friends

00:47:42.380 with a

00:47:42.700 Democrat

00:47:43.020 now.

00:47:44.600 It really

00:47:45.340 is.

00:47:45.760 It really

00:47:47.460 is.

00:47:48.900 The only

00:47:49.600 way you can

00:47:49.940 do it is

00:47:50.300 if they

00:47:50.560 don't follow

00:47:51.080 politics.

00:47:52.420 If they

00:47:52.760 follow politics

00:47:53.400 you just

00:47:53.840 can't even

00:47:54.380 hang out

00:47:54.740 with them.

00:47:57.560 Scott's

00:47:58.040 waking up.

00:48:01.500 Now,

00:48:02.240 I did

00:48:05.040 learn

00:48:05.380 that at

00:48:07.700 least one

00:48:08.100 person when

00:48:08.640 they say

00:48:09.000 Scott's

00:48:09.460 waking up

00:48:10.040 is just

00:48:12.340 joking.

00:48:12.740 so I'm

00:48:14.620 going to

00:48:14.820 treat it

00:48:15.140 like it's

00:48:15.800 just joking

00:48:16.320 when you

00:48:16.620 say that

00:48:17.040 because I

00:48:17.600 don't know

00:48:17.880 the difference.

00:48:24.360 You've

00:48:24.900 lost friends

00:48:25.500 since listening

00:48:26.100 to my

00:48:26.580 podcast.

00:48:29.100 How many

00:48:29.780 of you have

00:48:30.240 lost friends

00:48:30.920 because of

00:48:31.420 something I've

00:48:31.940 said?

00:48:34.400 Oh my

00:48:37.040 God.

00:48:37.360 because of

00:48:39.160 something I

00:48:39.620 said?

00:48:41.340 Well,

00:48:42.780 it turns

00:48:43.000 out I've

00:48:43.480 cost a lot

00:48:44.100 of people

00:48:44.360 their friends.

00:48:47.360 You're all

00:48:47.960 saying yes.

00:48:48.860 Are you

00:48:49.220 serious?

00:48:52.520 Somebody

00:48:52.960 said check

00:48:53.440 the market.

00:48:56.260 What is the

00:48:57.000 stock market

00:48:57.560 doing?

00:49:00.320 Nothing.

00:49:00.720 Why did

00:49:03.680 you say

00:49:03.900 check the

00:49:04.300 market?

00:49:04.820 There's

00:49:04.960 not really

00:49:05.560 anything

00:49:05.840 happening.

00:49:09.120 Your

00:49:09.600 friends are

00:49:10.080 tired of

00:49:10.560 you quoting

00:49:11.060 me.

00:49:12.240 Does

00:49:12.680 anybody else

00:49:13.140 have that

00:49:13.440 problem?

00:49:14.520 Oh my

00:49:14.920 God.

00:49:15.980 Apparently

00:49:16.320 I've

00:49:16.600 cost a

00:49:17.000 lot of

00:49:17.220 you a 0.57

00:49:17.460 lot of

00:49:17.700 friends.

00:49:19.140 Oh my

00:49:19.540 God.

00:49:20.000 This is

00:49:20.520 horrifying.

00:49:22.440 My wife

00:49:23.200 doesn't like

00:49:23.760 hearing you.

00:49:28.160 How many

00:49:29.520 of you have

00:49:30.060 a spouse

00:49:31.160 or a

00:49:32.400 significant

00:49:32.780 other

00:49:33.200 who

00:49:34.440 can't

00:49:36.400 stand your

00:49:37.120 habit of

00:49:37.740 listening to

00:49:38.260 me?

00:49:39.740 Does

00:49:40.140 anybody have

00:49:40.580 a spouse

00:49:41.020 who's going

00:49:41.480 crazy?

00:49:46.360 Can you

00:49:47.140 do me a

00:49:48.220 favor?

00:49:48.560 If you

00:49:48.780 have a

00:49:49.040 spouse

00:49:49.440 who hates

00:49:51.240 you listening

00:49:51.740 to me,

00:49:52.600 could you

00:49:52.940 just turn

00:49:53.340 up the

00:49:53.640 sound right

00:49:54.280 now?

00:49:55.300 Because I

00:49:55.720 have a

00:49:56.080 message for

00:49:56.540 your spouse.

00:49:57.880 I'll give

00:49:58.180 you a 0.57

00:49:58.700 second.

00:49:59.060 Everybody,

00:50:00.060 could you

00:50:00.400 just turn

00:50:01.040 up your

00:50:01.540 volume really

00:50:02.780 loud if

00:50:04.260 your spouse

00:50:04.720 is around?

00:50:05.700 I want to

00:50:06.060 talk to your

00:50:06.480 spouse for a

00:50:07.060 second.

00:50:07.800 I think that's

00:50:08.480 long enough.

00:50:09.060 Are you

00:50:09.220 ready?

00:50:10.740 Hey,

00:50:11.280 spouse,

00:50:12.180 you should

00:50:12.840 totally be

00:50:13.520 listening to

00:50:14.820 these live

00:50:15.420 streams because

00:50:16.680 you would

00:50:16.980 learn so

00:50:17.460 much.

00:50:18.720 Your spouse

00:50:19.380 is the

00:50:19.940 smart one.

00:50:21.320 You should

00:50:21.760 be possibly

00:50:22.700 doing more

00:50:23.360 things for

00:50:24.200 him or her

00:50:24.860 because the

00:50:26.080 smart one is

00:50:26.660 watching my

00:50:27.240 live stream.

00:50:28.620 Now you've

00:50:29.300 been warned.

00:50:30.620 If you're

00:50:31.060 watching the

00:50:31.620 other news,

00:50:32.740 you're deeply

00:50:33.320 uninformed.

00:50:35.260 Join your

00:50:35.820 spouse.

00:50:37.220 Join your

00:50:37.900 spouse.

00:50:41.460 You can

00:50:42.060 turn that

00:50:42.400 into volume

00:50:42.780 now.

00:50:44.640 I feel

00:50:45.240 like we

00:50:46.780 came together

00:50:47.360 a little bit

00:50:47.840 there.

00:50:48.720 Did you

00:50:49.040 feel it?

00:50:50.440 Yeah.

00:50:51.260 It was like

00:50:51.880 the world

00:50:52.220 was divided

00:50:52.900 and then I

00:50:53.480 feel like we

00:50:53.880 brought them

00:50:54.280 together.

00:50:54.580 bonding,

00:50:57.800 exactly.

00:51:00.860 Anne says

00:51:01.700 no sex 0.94

00:51:02.220 for a

00:51:02.540 month for

00:51:03.360 her.

00:51:05.780 So

00:51:06.060 Anne's

00:51:08.040 available.

00:51:08.400 Oh,

00:51:08.800 that's too

00:51:18.340 funny.

00:51:18.620 if there's

00:51:21.640 anybody else

00:51:22.180 not getting

00:51:22.640 sex from

00:51:23.160 their spouse,

00:51:24.120 you might

00:51:24.900 want to

00:51:25.140 call it

00:51:25.460 out here

00:51:25.820 because there's

00:51:26.440 plenty of

00:51:26.800 people who

00:51:27.160 are willing

00:51:27.400 to fill

00:51:27.800 in.

00:51:30.680 I'm just

00:51:31.300 talking about

00:51:31.960 transitory

00:51:32.960 sex.

00:51:34.580 I'm not

00:51:34.920 talking about

00:51:35.380 the permanent

00:51:35.880 kind of a

00:51:36.420 sex partner.

00:51:37.460 I just

00:51:37.940 mean to get

00:51:38.660 you past

00:51:39.060 the live

00:51:39.500 stream and

00:51:40.120 through the

00:51:40.480 political

00:51:40.840 period,

00:51:42.060 more of a

00:51:42.520 transitory

00:51:43.580 cheating.

00:51:44.240 so you

00:51:47.640 got that to

00:51:48.120 look forward

00:51:48.520 to.

00:51:51.080 Oh,

00:51:51.600 my.

00:51:57.000 I've

00:51:57.480 taught all

00:51:57.920 of you how

00:51:58.320 to lose

00:51:58.620 your friends.

00:52:01.620 Oh,

00:52:02.180 that's more

00:52:03.360 than true.

00:52:07.500 All right.

00:52:08.340 All right,

00:52:08.760 well,

00:52:08.920 let me ask

00:52:09.280 on the

00:52:09.540 positive side.

00:52:10.720 How many

00:52:11.180 of you

00:52:11.600 have bonded

00:52:13.180 with your

00:52:13.880 spouse or

00:52:14.520 significant

00:52:15.000 other or

00:52:15.720 even a

00:52:16.080 family member

00:52:16.640 over my

00:52:18.240 live stream?

00:52:19.840 Is there

00:52:20.480 anybody here

00:52:21.160 who listens

00:52:21.840 to it with

00:52:22.340 their mom,

00:52:23.580 for example?

00:52:28.180 I know

00:52:28.960 some of you

00:52:29.940 do.

00:52:31.420 Some of you

00:52:32.120 listen to it

00:52:32.660 with your

00:52:32.940 mom.

00:52:33.640 All right.

00:52:34.120 Okay,

00:52:34.580 good.

00:52:35.600 See,

00:52:35.940 I'm bringing

00:52:36.300 people together.

00:52:37.740 I'm bringing

00:52:38.300 families together.

00:52:39.180 I'm not just

00:52:39.800 ripping people

00:52:40.420 apart.

00:52:41.320 I'm bringing

00:52:41.980 them together.

00:52:43.880 All right,

00:52:44.640 good.

00:52:46.600 So,

00:52:47.320 let me ask

00:52:48.120 you this.

00:52:48.840 How many

00:52:49.300 of you

00:52:49.860 came into

00:52:50.420 this live

00:52:50.960 stream

00:52:51.320 on fire

00:52:53.060 because of

00:52:54.760 the raid

00:52:55.380 on Mar-a-Lago

00:52:56.300 and I

00:52:58.160 talked you

00:52:58.680 down a

00:52:59.080 little bit?

00:53:00.180 Do you feel

00:53:00.700 more relaxed?

00:53:02.440 Just wait

00:53:03.100 and see.

00:53:04.020 Because,

00:53:04.620 first of all,

00:53:05.440 if what you

00:53:06.020 want is a

00:53:06.660 Trump presidency,

00:53:07.940 I think

00:53:08.720 he got

00:53:09.040 closer.

00:53:09.520 If this

00:53:12.680 follows the

00:53:13.380 pattern of

00:53:14.040 every other

00:53:14.640 thing we've

00:53:15.180 seen,

00:53:16.100 the pattern

00:53:16.660 would be

00:53:17.100 they're

00:53:17.760 over-claiming,

00:53:19.420 they don't

00:53:20.220 have evidence

00:53:20.840 of any

00:53:21.180 kinds of

00:53:21.600 crimes,

00:53:22.400 they're going

00:53:22.940 to act

00:53:23.240 like they

00:53:23.620 do,

00:53:24.540 and then

00:53:24.960 the Republicans

00:53:25.640 are going

00:53:26.040 to get

00:53:26.260 really,

00:53:26.940 really mad

00:53:27.580 that they

00:53:28.660 have been

00:53:28.940 hunted.

00:53:31.140 By the

00:53:31.740 way,

00:53:32.120 have I

00:53:32.420 ever made

00:53:32.820 a better

00:53:33.160 prediction

00:53:33.580 than the

00:53:34.200 one I

00:53:34.500 most mocked

00:53:35.340 for,

00:53:36.520 that Republicans

00:53:37.200 would get

00:53:37.680 hunted?

00:53:37.940 Your dog,

00:53:46.260 does anybody

00:53:46.660 have a pet

00:53:47.340 who likes

00:53:47.840 to listen

00:53:48.240 to me

00:53:48.640 in the

00:53:48.920 morning?

00:53:50.020 Anybody?

00:53:50.760 Does anybody

00:53:51.220 have a pet?

00:53:52.520 Dog or a

00:53:53.220 cat?

00:53:54.380 Yes,

00:53:54.840 dogs mostly,

00:53:55.780 right?

00:53:56.640 Yeah,

00:53:57.060 because I

00:53:57.400 don't really

00:53:57.720 speak to

00:53:58.100 the cats.

00:54:00.400 I try

00:54:01.120 to do

00:54:01.700 content

00:54:02.500 that leans

00:54:03.500 human canine

00:54:05.500 and a

00:54:06.800 little bit

00:54:07.140 less

00:54:07.520 cat.

00:54:14.500 Cats won't

00:54:15.240 listen.

00:54:15.700 Well,

00:54:16.000 you need

00:54:16.340 new cats.

00:54:21.560 You lost

00:54:22.340 your pet

00:54:22.700 friends.

00:54:23.080 I don't

00:54:23.240 know.

00:54:24.260 Somebody

00:54:24.660 lost their

00:54:25.260 pet friends

00:54:25.980 because of

00:54:26.900 listening.

00:54:27.380 That's bad.

00:54:28.700 I'm sorry.

00:54:30.200 The pets

00:54:30.540 couldn't handle

00:54:31.020 you anymore.

00:54:32.060 Was it

00:54:32.680 because you

00:54:33.040 were quoting

00:54:33.480 me too

00:54:33.820 much?

00:54:36.020 Has anybody

00:54:36.740 ever quoted

00:54:37.300 me?

00:54:46.280 I've got a

00:54:46.980 feeling that

00:54:47.380 happens sometimes.

00:54:49.020 You know,

00:54:49.280 I was,

00:54:50.380 before I did

00:54:51.260 any public

00:54:51.980 stuff,

00:54:54.360 here's a

00:54:55.080 little weird

00:54:55.880 little anecdote

00:54:56.520 since I have a

00:54:57.360 minute here.

00:54:57.680 back in my

00:54:59.920 corporate days

00:55:00.460 before I

00:55:01.080 started

00:55:01.460 Dilbert,

00:55:02.020 before I

00:55:02.380 had any

00:55:02.820 kind of

00:55:03.560 public

00:55:04.140 notoriety,

00:55:05.360 when I

00:55:06.060 was just

00:55:06.480 guy in

00:55:07.060 cubicle,

00:55:08.560 one of the

00:55:08.980 things I

00:55:09.340 noticed was

00:55:10.060 that my

00:55:11.300 boss's

00:55:12.960 boss

00:55:13.400 would quote

00:55:14.940 me.

00:55:16.900 And the

00:55:17.560 first time it

00:55:18.000 happened,

00:55:18.280 I thought,

00:55:18.820 oh,

00:55:19.520 look at me

00:55:20.200 saying something

00:55:20.940 so well

00:55:22.080 that it

00:55:22.460 got quoted

00:55:22.940 by,

00:55:23.300 you know,

00:55:24.480 a senior

00:55:25.340 member of

00:55:25.980 the company.

00:55:28.840 And then I

00:55:29.480 noticed it

00:55:29.900 happened again.

00:55:33.080 And I

00:55:33.860 realized,

00:55:34.560 well before I

00:55:35.360 was famous,

00:55:35.900 I realized that

00:55:36.540 I was quotable,

00:55:38.280 like weirdly

00:55:38.840 quotable,

00:55:40.100 because people

00:55:40.760 were doing it.

00:55:41.820 And I don't

00:55:42.460 remember a lot

00:55:43.040 of other people

00:55:43.660 who were being

00:55:44.160 quoted as

00:55:45.160 co-workers.

00:55:46.080 It was sort

00:55:46.600 of an odd

00:55:46.960 thing.

00:55:47.160 But apparently

00:55:48.380 I had the

00:55:49.140 ability to

00:55:49.900 wordsmith

00:55:51.040 clever little

00:55:52.620 sentences that

00:55:53.560 people like to

00:55:54.100 quote.

00:55:54.980 And honestly

00:55:56.500 to me,

00:55:57.920 that was the

00:55:58.740 first signal

00:56:00.360 that I received

00:56:01.420 that I could

00:56:02.580 do something

00:56:03.020 in public

00:56:03.480 that people

00:56:03.940 would care

00:56:04.300 about.

00:56:05.280 Now I

00:56:05.640 always imagined

00:56:06.320 it,

00:56:06.700 like I

00:56:07.060 visualized it,

00:56:08.300 so I imagined

00:56:08.940 myself doing

00:56:09.600 things in

00:56:10.080 public long

00:56:11.160 before I had

00:56:11.740 any public

00:56:12.320 interaction.

00:56:14.920 But I

00:56:15.540 didn't have

00:56:15.900 any,

00:56:16.420 you know,

00:56:16.900 reason to

00:56:17.740 think it,

00:56:18.500 it was just

00:56:18.940 a vision.

00:56:20.020 But once I

00:56:21.000 saw regular

00:56:21.760 people quoting

00:56:22.580 me,

00:56:23.740 I thought,

00:56:24.680 well,

00:56:25.500 there must

00:56:25.840 be something

00:56:26.300 I do with

00:56:26.940 words that

00:56:27.540 people want

00:56:27.980 to hear.

00:56:29.040 And sure

00:56:29.380 enough,

00:56:30.020 turns out

00:56:30.500 people like

00:56:31.840 to hear me

00:56:32.400 put words

00:56:32.960 together in

00:56:33.700 a variety

00:56:34.160 of different

00:56:34.700 formats.

00:56:38.840 So I

00:56:39.540 would look

00:56:39.820 for that,

00:56:40.200 by the way.

00:56:40.880 So if

00:56:41.140 you're looking

00:56:41.500 for somebody

00:56:42.380 to,

00:56:42.940 you know,

00:56:43.340 maybe break

00:56:44.920 out from

00:56:45.420 your work

00:56:46.340 situation,

00:56:47.360 look for

00:56:47.820 people that

00:56:48.320 you quote.

00:56:50.200 Because it

00:56:50.740 could even

00:56:51.080 be like a 0.54

00:56:51.680 kid in your

00:56:52.200 family.

00:56:53.200 Some of you

00:56:53.700 have that

00:56:54.020 situation,

00:56:54.600 right?

00:56:55.180 There'll be

00:56:55.480 like a 12-year-old

00:56:56.360 in your family

00:56:56.940 and you find

00:56:57.340 yourself quoting

00:56:58.080 the 12-year-old

00:56:58.840 because they

00:56:59.740 actually said

00:57:00.220 something that

00:57:00.600 was kind of

00:57:00.960 cool and you

00:57:01.720 actually just

00:57:02.180 liked it.

00:57:03.560 Just keep an

00:57:04.340 eye on that.

00:57:05.080 If that happens

00:57:05.680 more than once,

00:57:07.440 if you find

00:57:08.000 yourself quoting

00:57:08.860 a 12-year-old

00:57:09.640 more than once,

00:57:11.560 buy some stock

00:57:12.520 in that 12-year-old.

00:57:13.340 Because that's

00:57:16.340 a kid who's

00:57:16.780 going somewhere.

00:57:20.980 Quoting

00:57:21.460 yourself is

00:57:22.680 quite fine.

00:57:25.780 How many of

00:57:26.560 you think that

00:57:27.220 my voice is

00:57:29.060 somehow related

00:57:29.900 to why you

00:57:31.840 watch this?

00:57:33.300 Because in my

00:57:34.240 opinion, my

00:57:34.940 voice is terrible.

00:57:35.800 I'm always

00:57:36.060 clearing my

00:57:36.740 throat and

00:57:37.340 sneezing and

00:57:38.740 full of

00:57:39.460 allergies.

00:57:39.860 So a little

00:57:45.460 bit both

00:57:46.180 ways.

00:57:48.820 Yeah, I

00:57:49.560 told you

00:57:49.920 before, I

00:57:50.480 listened to my

00:57:51.340 voice five

00:57:52.080 years ago on

00:57:53.560 the Joe Rogan

00:57:54.760 show or

00:57:55.980 whenever it

00:57:56.480 was.

00:57:57.540 And it's

00:57:58.560 really different

00:57:59.180 now.

00:58:00.940 So five

00:58:01.760 years ago, my

00:58:02.520 voice sounded

00:58:03.060 like a senior

00:58:03.660 citizen because

00:58:04.400 it was still

00:58:04.800 weak from the

00:58:05.920 years of not

00:58:06.460 being able to

00:58:06.900 speak.

00:58:07.600 But because I

00:58:08.300 do this for an

00:58:08.900 hour a day,

00:58:09.860 my voice just

00:58:11.300 got stronger.

00:58:12.060 I was listening

00:58:12.600 to it recently

00:58:13.260 and it sounds

00:58:14.920 younger.

00:58:16.640 Oh, what do

00:58:17.140 you think?

00:58:17.520 Instead of me

00:58:18.280 telling you, I'll

00:58:19.000 ask you, does

00:58:19.980 my current

00:58:20.560 voice sound

00:58:22.200 younger than

00:58:22.960 my age?

00:58:25.660 I think it

00:58:26.480 does.

00:58:27.980 But it's only

00:58:29.040 because it's

00:58:29.540 stronger.

00:58:30.800 And I think

00:58:31.260 anybody who

00:58:31.920 practices their

00:58:32.920 voice muscles,

00:58:34.900 I think if

00:58:35.580 your voice gets

00:58:36.760 stronger, it

00:58:38.940 makes you feel

00:58:39.540 younger.

00:58:41.100 I mean, you

00:58:41.560 register as

00:58:42.200 younger.

00:58:43.420 Because I

00:58:43.960 think the

00:58:44.780 old person

00:58:46.180 voice you

00:58:46.700 hear is

00:58:47.100 weakness,

00:58:47.700 right?

00:58:48.660 If you

00:58:49.160 listen to

00:58:49.580 an old

00:58:49.880 person, it

00:58:50.360 sounds like

00:58:50.880 there's

00:58:51.140 literally muscle

00:58:52.160 weakness,

00:58:52.780 like, get

00:58:54.740 off of my

00:58:55.340 lawn.

00:58:56.560 You know, like

00:58:56.920 there's just

00:58:57.220 no muscle

00:58:57.740 there.

00:58:59.140 And speaking

00:59:00.400 is like every

00:59:01.060 other muscle.

00:59:03.200 The more

00:59:03.820 you do, the

00:59:04.620 better you can

00:59:05.180 do it.

00:59:05.560 So the

00:59:06.140 fact that I

00:59:06.600 do it a

00:59:07.020 lot is

00:59:08.160 what makes

00:59:08.600 me age

00:59:09.320 backwards.

00:59:11.720 I do feel

00:59:12.480 like I'm

00:59:12.800 aging backwards

00:59:13.440 in some

00:59:13.840 ways.

00:59:22.080 Did you

00:59:26.620 turn off

00:59:26.980 YouTube?

00:59:27.380 No, not

00:59:27.740 yet.

00:59:30.740 All right,

00:59:31.320 but I think

00:59:31.700 I'm done.

00:59:32.660 YouTube, do

00:59:33.120 you have

00:59:33.240 any questions

00:59:33.680 before I

00:59:34.120 go?

00:59:35.480 Yeah, my

00:59:36.120 nose always

00:59:36.620 sounds plugged.

00:59:41.780 You sound

00:59:42.420 like I have

00:59:43.060 a permanent

00:59:43.460 allergy.

00:59:44.280 Well, that's

00:59:44.600 true.

00:59:46.160 Every now

00:59:46.820 and then,

00:59:47.320 maybe one

00:59:47.940 out of

00:59:48.200 20 times,

00:59:49.680 my head is

00:59:50.580 clear from

00:59:51.100 allergies.

00:59:52.220 It does

00:59:52.580 sound very

00:59:52.980 different.

00:59:55.140 I sound

00:59:55.780 good for

00:59:56.100 75.

00:59:57.480 All right.

00:59:58.500 YouTube,

00:59:59.120 thanks for

00:59:59.580 joining.

01:00:00.420 Let's wait

01:00:00.860 and find out

01:00:01.300 what's happening

01:00:01.880 with this

01:00:02.360 Mar-a-Lago

01:00:02.980 stuff and

01:00:03.420 we'll talk

01:00:03.760 to you

01:00:03.940 tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 09, 2022

Episode 1830 Scott Adams： FBI Raids Trumps Mar-a-Lago Home And That Means Trouble...For Everyone

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript