Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 12, 2022


Episode 1833 Scott Adams: Let's Talk About The Fake News About Nuclear Weapons Secrets At Mar-a-Lago


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 8 minutes

Words per Minute

141.91156

Word Count

9,655

Sentence Count

755

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

14


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.080 good morning everybody and welcome to the most surprising and amazing
00:00:14.320 experience of your entire life some say it's a highlight of civilization when
00:00:21.080 they'd be right it's called coffee with Scott Adams and it's the only place
00:00:24.080 you're going to hear useful stuff. Everything else is pure fake news. But here, you're going
00:00:31.760 to get the good stuff. And let's check the headlines. Is there anything in the headlines?
00:00:37.600 Ah! Ah! Well, if it's true. But it's not. And if you'd like to take your awareness up to the
00:00:47.280 highest possible level for today, tomorrow it might be a little bit higher. But today,
00:00:53.120 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or gel, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel
00:00:59.220 of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid I like, coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled
00:01:06.800 pleasure, the dopamine here of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's
00:01:11.660 called the Simultaneous Sip. Go.
00:01:14.880 Oh. You know, there was a TV show years ago, Battlestar Galactica. There were two versions
00:01:31.300 of it. In the newer version, there were artificial beings who were indistinguishable from normal
00:01:40.100 beings, unless you had a special test. There'd be a special test to find out who was human
00:01:45.700 and who was some form of NPC. And you say to yourself, wouldn't that be useful to have
00:01:51.980 now? Wouldn't you like to know who among you are the Cylons, to use that phrase from the
00:01:58.860 TV show? And who among you are real people? And it turns out that maybe you don't have access
00:02:05.540 to this tool, but I do. I do. I have an actual tool to determine who are NPCs. They're the
00:02:13.440 people who leave comments in my Twitter feed that say something like, well, I didn't know
00:02:20.500 it until now, but Adams is the pointy-haired boss. Or what about lasagna on Mondays?
00:02:31.500 So I'm going to start tagging all of the NPCs that I see today. So I'm just going to do
00:02:37.180 hashtag NPC, because they're the ones who have just the little canned obvious things. So when
00:02:46.500 I announced the other day on Twitter that we had entered phase two, which I had not defined
00:02:54.140 at that time, a lot of people came in and said, well, not people, NPCs. And they said,
00:03:00.800 how's phase two going? How's phase two going, Scott? Have you read the news lately? Ha ha ha ha ha!
00:03:08.240 We'll expect your apology, because if you didn't know it, the reporting last night was that
00:03:16.240 President Trump might have been storing nuclear weapon secrets at Mar-a-Lago. Ha ha ha! Idiot.
00:03:27.520 Cartoon boy, what do you say about that? What do you say about that, cartoon boy? How about
00:03:32.240 that? Ha ha ha ha ha! We gotcha! Gotcha! Gotcha! So that's what my evening looked like. I went
00:03:43.620 to bed to that. And I said to myself, well, probably look into this in the morning. Must
00:03:50.520 be some new news. And then I saw the news. The news. Let's talk about the news. Have you
00:04:00.740 ever heard of a thing called a, what's it called? A wrap-up, wrap-up smear? Do you know
00:04:09.780 what a wrap-up smear is? Well, let's have Nancy Pelosi explain it. You demonize, and then you,
00:04:19.440 we call it the wrap-up smear. The wrap-up smear. You want to talk politics. You call it the wrap-up
00:04:23.440 smear. You smear somebody. Smear somebody. With falsehoods and all the rest. With falsehoods. And
00:04:28.820 then you merchandise it. Then you merchandise it. And then you write it. Then you write it. See,
00:04:32.480 it's reported in the press. Ah. That this, this, this, and this. It's in the press now. So they have that validation that the press reported the smear. Reported the smear. And then it's called the wrap-up smear. Now I'm going to merchandise. Now you merchandise it. The press's report on the smear that we made. And it's, it's a tactic. It's a tactic. And it's, it's self-evident.
00:04:50.440 It's a tactic. It's a self-fulfilling tactic. You demonize, and then you, we call it the wrap-up smear.
00:04:56.300 It's called the wrap-up smear. Now, Nancy Pelosi was describing how she believes her opponents use it.
00:05:06.080 But once you know it's a thing, you kind of see it everywhere. And let's see if we can identify a wrap-up smear in the news today.
00:05:18.460 Are there any wrap-up smears happening right now that the NPCs believe is actual real news?
00:05:28.820 Maybe. Because we woke up to some interesting news. But first, let's do this in order.
00:05:36.600 A.G. Garland went on TV to announce his statement about the raid on Mar-a-Lago. It turns out he did authorize it.
00:05:44.960 So that was news. And all the smart people said, uh, what are the odds he didn't authorize it?
00:05:53.320 Because remember, the first story was trying to make it seem as though Christopher Wray authorized it because he was a Trump appointee.
00:06:00.860 See how the fake news works? Oh, no, it was a Trump appointee who authorized it.
00:06:07.940 But it turns out it wasn't.
00:06:10.480 Not only was it not, it was, you know, a obvious Democrat appointee, Garland.
00:06:17.780 But they kept that from us for how long? Like a day or so?
00:06:21.980 Well, so there is maybe 40% of the public will never hear the correction.
00:06:27.680 And they will always believe that it was a Trump appointed person who authorized the raid.
00:06:33.880 They'll never hear the correction.
00:06:36.400 So that's the first trick, is that the fake news always travels longer than the correction.
00:06:42.060 So you see that trick.
00:06:46.660 I have a question about who advised the Attorney General Garland to act totally guilty in front of the public.
00:06:56.440 Do you think anybody gave him that advice?
00:06:59.760 Because it looks like he took it.
00:07:02.020 I've never seen anybody act more guilty than that guy.
00:07:05.880 And you look for the things he doesn't say, right?
00:07:08.180 The things he does say is, oh, we have this reason to do it.
00:07:14.940 And the reason because, and he doesn't say, because it's a secret.
00:07:24.160 And then he says, oh, we're going to call your bluff.
00:07:27.140 We're going to release the warrant, the part that would just say what things they were looking for.
00:07:34.840 And then Trump says, I want it released too.
00:07:38.180 And then the public says, you don't have it?
00:07:41.860 They handed you a copy.
00:07:44.020 But then you look at the reporting.
00:07:46.700 Have you seen what words the reporting uses to describe the, let's say, allegation,
00:07:54.000 that the Trump team has in their possession the copy of the warrant?
00:07:57.840 Now, my understanding of the process is, they have to have a copy of it.
00:08:03.120 Am I wrong about that?
00:08:05.380 The process pretty much guarantees that somebody has a copy of it on the Trump side, right?
00:08:10.800 But when you look at how the Trump people talk about it, and how the news reports it,
00:08:18.400 have you ever noticed that they never say, they never say there's a confirmation that Trump has a copy,
00:08:25.580 like a physical copy?
00:08:26.740 Because there was some weird reporting about how maybe they showed it to some people,
00:08:31.920 but didn't let them keep it?
00:08:34.760 Does that sound, that doesn't sound real, does it?
00:08:36.820 But that's one of the rumors we heard.
00:08:40.460 Lyle says, Scott's spinning hard.
00:08:43.600 Oh, Lyle.
00:08:45.240 Stick around.
00:08:46.000 Stick around, my NPC friend.
00:08:49.620 You might learn something.
00:08:51.280 It's going to get, we're going to get wild here in a minute.
00:08:53.940 This is just the introduction.
00:08:55.960 You haven't seen anything.
00:08:58.720 All right, so, the words that are used about the warrant being in the hands of the Trump people
00:09:05.340 are things like, they were shown the warrant.
00:09:10.220 Shown.
00:09:11.460 Now, I think I'm making that one up.
00:09:12.740 But if you look at the actual words, it's like, they were presented with the warrant.
00:09:17.880 They showed them the warrant.
00:09:20.080 Of course you had to show the warrant.
00:09:22.840 Of course it was shown.
00:09:25.140 But do you notice all the words are lacking the retained part?
00:09:30.140 Now, I believe it was retained.
00:09:31.800 If I had to place a bet, I would bet that somebody on the Trump team has a physical copy.
00:09:38.420 But even as of this morning, Fox News says they couldn't confirm it.
00:09:42.740 This morning, like just an hour ago, Fox News says they can't confirm that the Trump team has a physical copy.
00:09:50.800 Now, I'm pretty sure they do.
00:09:55.520 Does anybody believe they don't have a physical copy?
00:09:59.160 If you're taking it from a persuasion perspective,
00:10:05.800 Trump is playing this exactly right.
00:10:09.700 Because he's being vague about whether he has the warrant,
00:10:12.500 which makes you wonder if everything was copacetic.
00:10:14.800 So it's actually smart from a persuasion perspective.
00:10:20.100 You can argue the ethics of anything here.
00:10:22.320 That could be your conversation with yourself.
00:10:25.440 But in terms of effectiveness,
00:10:27.820 Trump is doing two really good things.
00:10:30.460 He's being vague about whether they have the warrant,
00:10:33.020 which makes everybody get excited.
00:10:34.860 And then he adds to the ambiguity
00:10:37.020 by saying he agrees with the attorney general
00:10:42.640 and he would like, quote,
00:10:44.440 all of the documents released.
00:10:46.900 Do you think Trump is talking about the same documents
00:10:49.100 that the attorney general is talking about?
00:10:51.400 Of course not.
00:10:52.560 Of course not.
00:10:53.240 That's how the trick is played.
00:10:54.740 So Trump is cleverly
00:10:56.200 expanding the definition of the documents
00:10:59.380 to be beyond what the attorney general is saying,
00:11:02.800 which is just the list of stuff they're looking for.
00:11:05.660 And then a receipt for the things they took,
00:11:08.260 which could be slightly different
00:11:09.680 from what they were looking for.
00:11:11.560 Probably is different.
00:11:13.120 But those are the only things
00:11:14.340 that Garland was talking about.
00:11:17.820 Beyond that, there's something called,
00:11:20.300 I think, the affidavit, right?
00:11:21.780 That is a long description
00:11:23.540 of why they thought they needed to operate quickly,
00:11:27.200 why they needed a warrant,
00:11:28.580 why they couldn't do it in any other way.
00:11:31.640 That document is surely what Trump wants you to think
00:11:34.880 is the missing part, because it is missing.
00:11:37.920 Now, the process itself
00:11:39.560 keeps that away from the public.
00:11:43.320 So if you didn't know
00:11:44.500 that we're not allowed to see that,
00:11:46.040 and there's a good reason,
00:11:47.560 because you don't want allegations out in the public.
00:11:50.100 You want to keep that within the legal system
00:11:51.980 until something gets more public
00:11:54.480 or more closer to proven.
00:11:55.940 So what Trump is saying,
00:11:58.780 yeah, release it all.
00:12:00.460 He knows that can never happen,
00:12:02.280 and it will always look like
00:12:03.960 they're hiding something.
00:12:06.540 And they are.
00:12:08.320 They are hiding something.
00:12:10.120 Now, they're hiding it behind
00:12:11.300 a legal requirement that I agree with,
00:12:14.000 so they have to hide it.
00:12:15.720 But I think they're pretty happy
00:12:17.120 that they're not showing it to anybody
00:12:18.460 for a variety of political and practical reasons.
00:12:21.240 So Trump's persuasion approach
00:12:24.900 is pure bullshit, I think.
00:12:27.920 It's pure bullshit, but pretty good.
00:12:30.680 Pretty good.
00:12:31.620 Now, the other side, of course,
00:12:33.300 is also pure bullshit,
00:12:34.980 but we'll talk about how well they're doing it.
00:12:37.900 Pretty good, actually.
00:12:39.660 If I'm going to score the Democrats
00:12:42.160 for just persuasion,
00:12:43.980 as opposed to, again,
00:12:45.300 ethical or moral treatment,
00:12:47.100 same as I did with Trump,
00:12:48.180 make your own decisions
00:12:50.200 about the moral or ethical angles,
00:12:52.300 it's politics.
00:12:53.880 In politics, you think your team can do it
00:12:56.020 and the other team can't.
00:12:57.240 So there's nothing to talk about there.
00:13:01.440 But, so Trump is playing it well.
00:13:05.340 He's keeping it alive,
00:13:06.780 but I'm not showing you the warrant,
00:13:08.120 which I assume he has a copy of.
00:13:09.760 He's broadening the description of the documents
00:13:12.280 to include the affidavit,
00:13:13.980 which you know you're never going to see,
00:13:15.520 which will always look sketchy to the public,
00:13:17.520 because the public won't catch the nuance
00:13:19.900 that you're not allowed to see that kind of stuff
00:13:22.880 at this phase of a legal process.
00:13:27.380 Now, Garland, having looked perfectly guilty
00:13:32.520 of something horrible,
00:13:35.240 but we don't know what,
00:13:37.640 got some cover fire today.
00:13:41.360 And did he notice that the cover fire
00:13:43.080 was exactly the right timing?
00:13:44.960 Because just when the news cycle
00:13:47.360 had turned desperately bad
00:13:49.880 for the Democrats,
00:13:51.720 it looked really bad,
00:13:53.180 and Garland didn't fix anything,
00:13:54.520 he made it worse.
00:13:55.960 Just when it was the darkest it could be,
00:13:59.760 the Washington Post
00:14:00.980 tells us that they have
00:14:02.940 two anonymous sources.
00:14:05.400 Anonymous sources.
00:14:07.120 Washington Post.
00:14:09.240 Anonymous sources.
00:14:10.180 So, credibility looks good so far,
00:14:15.660 and there's something negative about Trump.
00:14:18.440 Anonymous sources.
00:14:20.540 Washington Post.
00:14:22.240 Negative about Trump.
00:14:24.680 How would you rank that
00:14:26.200 if you didn't know anything else?
00:14:28.380 The only thing you knew were those facts.
00:14:30.260 How would you rank the credibility of that report?
00:14:33.720 Well, let me tell you how CNN ranked it.
00:14:36.040 CNN is reporting on
00:14:38.720 Washington Post's reporting
00:14:40.200 and says we can't confirm it.
00:14:44.780 They can't confirm it.
00:14:46.980 But they can report the fuck out of it,
00:14:48.960 can't they?
00:14:49.900 Not only that,
00:14:50.920 but here's what these assholes do
00:14:52.440 on Twitter.
00:14:55.840 On Twitter,
00:14:56.720 where they do the trending stories and stuff.
00:15:00.600 Let me tell you how Twitter,
00:15:02.700 or whoever does that,
00:15:03.740 whoever writes the summary has wrote it.
00:15:06.000 Here's the summary.
00:15:13.100 God damn it.
00:15:14.100 Yeah, I have it.
00:15:15.560 Or do I?
00:15:17.180 Let me look through my own notes.
00:15:18.940 There it is.
00:15:21.680 Damn it.
00:15:23.860 Oh, I guess I don't have that.
00:15:24.940 But the Washington,
00:15:27.920 so the summary on Twitter
00:15:29.500 says that
00:15:31.360 that Trump,
00:15:35.200 oh, here's the summary.
00:15:36.460 All right, I got it.
00:15:37.400 So here's the headline.
00:15:38.740 See if the headline
00:15:39.840 feels accurate to you.
00:15:43.560 Here's the headline.
00:15:45.300 FBI saw classified documents
00:15:47.600 related to nuclear weapons
00:15:49.820 during the Mar-a-Lago search,
00:15:52.760 comma,
00:15:53.840 according to the Washington Post.
00:15:55.480 Do you see what they did?
00:16:00.040 Let me read it again
00:16:01.060 and see if you can find
00:16:01.940 the brainwashing and manipulation.
00:16:04.180 It's just one sentence,
00:16:05.120 and it's right here.
00:16:06.500 FBI sought classified documents
00:16:08.620 related to nuclear weapons
00:16:10.560 during Mar-a-Lago search,
00:16:13.160 comma,
00:16:14.080 according to the Washington Post.
00:16:15.960 According to the Washington Post.
00:16:17.560 Now, is it according to the Washington Post,
00:16:19.460 or is it according to two anonymous people
00:16:21.360 that the Washington Post talked to?
00:16:24.420 Well, both.
00:16:25.480 But I think if you leave out
00:16:27.020 the anonymous part,
00:16:28.480 that means something.
00:16:29.800 And if you put the according to
00:16:31.380 at the end of the sentence
00:16:32.540 instead of the start of the sentence,
00:16:34.120 it's completely different.
00:16:37.560 Imagine this.
00:16:40.120 Imagine just rewording
00:16:41.360 the same sentence.
00:16:42.940 According to the Washington Post,
00:16:45.480 only.
00:16:47.340 According to the Washington Post,
00:16:49.540 only.
00:16:49.900 Trump was, you know,
00:16:53.720 had access to nuclear weapons secrets
00:16:55.860 or something at Mar-a-Lago.
00:16:58.640 Now, if you put the source first,
00:17:00.780 it debunks the story before you read it.
00:17:03.120 If you put the source last,
00:17:05.500 you accept the story
00:17:07.340 because it's in the news.
00:17:09.220 It's the news.
00:17:10.140 It's the headline.
00:17:10.580 So you read the news,
00:17:12.420 and then your brain just turns off
00:17:14.220 after the according to.
00:17:15.900 Because do you care?
00:17:17.240 It's like according to somebody important.
00:17:19.540 All right, so it must be true.
00:17:20.920 So last night,
00:17:21.980 all the people who don't know
00:17:23.080 how to consume news
00:17:24.360 were trying to dance on my grave
00:17:27.240 and insist on my apology,
00:17:30.000 and they couldn't wait
00:17:30.900 to get here this morning
00:17:31.820 because I'm going to be eating some crow
00:17:34.200 because it turns out
00:17:35.540 the least credible source
00:17:37.280 in the fucking solar system
00:17:39.120 said something that might be bad
00:17:41.620 for my side.
00:17:43.100 So they're pretty happy.
00:17:44.380 The NPCs are just,
00:17:45.500 well, well, well.
00:17:46.240 Have you ever seen NPCs dancing?
00:17:48.700 It's disgusting.
00:17:50.320 It's like a lane from Seinfeld.
00:17:52.200 Just all of them.
00:17:56.280 Sort of like that.
00:17:57.360 That's what they're doing today.
00:18:00.800 Anyway, let's dissect
00:18:02.320 their diabolical plan.
00:18:05.820 So I tweeted today
00:18:07.480 where we're heading.
00:18:10.680 So here's what's definitely
00:18:11.960 going to happen.
00:18:12.520 So the bad guys,
00:18:13.500 I'm going to call the bad guys
00:18:14.820 the fake news purveyors.
00:18:16.960 So the bad guys
00:18:17.860 are all the Democrats
00:18:18.700 and the fake news people
00:18:20.040 who are supporting them.
00:18:21.640 So here's where we're going.
00:18:23.120 So the bad guys are going to claim
00:18:24.540 that because it's
00:18:26.400 coincidentally,
00:18:27.380 and this is it,
00:18:29.760 this is really lucky
00:18:30.860 for the Democrats,
00:18:32.220 pretty coincidental,
00:18:33.640 that the thing that they say,
00:18:36.200 or not they,
00:18:37.180 but two anonymous sources
00:18:38.940 as they do the wrap-up smear,
00:18:41.960 so you see the wrap-up smear?
00:18:43.260 So the way Nancy Pelosi
00:18:45.480 explained how it's done
00:18:46.700 is if somebody makes a claim,
00:18:49.300 this would be the two
00:18:50.140 anonymous sources,
00:18:51.440 then it's reported in the news,
00:18:53.180 the Washington Post,
00:18:54.420 then the CNN reports,
00:18:56.040 CNN reports
00:18:56.880 the Washington Post
00:18:57.740 is reporting it,
00:18:58.820 and by the time you see it
00:18:59.880 in CNN,
00:19:01.140 you've lost
00:19:01.920 the anonymous source part,
00:19:04.040 maybe,
00:19:05.200 and basically
00:19:07.740 it just turns into
00:19:08.820 something that looks true.
00:19:11.400 Now,
00:19:11.920 if you go over to Fox News,
00:19:13.240 they won't be reporting it.
00:19:15.980 And here's a good
00:19:16.960 BS filter.
00:19:18.800 If both Fox News
00:19:20.360 and CNN
00:19:20.940 say something is true,
00:19:22.580 it's probably true.
00:19:23.940 For example,
00:19:25.260 did the FBI
00:19:26.100 enter Mar-a-Lago
00:19:27.340 looking for documents?
00:19:29.140 Fox News reports it,
00:19:30.400 yes.
00:19:31.240 CNN reports it,
00:19:32.380 yes.
00:19:32.660 you could probably depend
00:19:33.920 that that actually happened.
00:19:36.680 Right?
00:19:37.820 If CNN reports
00:19:40.280 the Washington Post reports
00:19:41.800 that there might have been
00:19:43.200 nuclear weapons secrets
00:19:45.260 in Mar-a-Lago,
00:19:46.800 but Fox News
00:19:47.980 does not report it,
00:19:49.520 is it true?
00:19:51.960 It could be,
00:19:53.740 but probably not.
00:19:55.760 Right?
00:19:56.200 If you're going to
00:19:57.140 play the odds,
00:19:58.260 something that's reported
00:19:59.220 as true on one
00:20:01.280 and untrue on the other
00:20:02.820 is probably fake.
00:20:07.000 Now,
00:20:07.760 the Hunter laptop story
00:20:09.120 is a notable exception.
00:20:12.640 But,
00:20:13.560 if you get,
00:20:14.440 if you get either one
00:20:15.460 of your entities
00:20:16.660 saying that something
00:20:17.700 is fake,
00:20:19.040 it's probably fake.
00:20:20.820 So,
00:20:21.560 actually,
00:20:21.980 the laptop story
00:20:22.800 does work
00:20:23.420 because Fox News
00:20:24.640 always said it was true
00:20:25.720 and the other side
00:20:28.640 said it was fake,
00:20:29.440 but they had
00:20:30.060 such an obvious,
00:20:32.360 the 50 intelligence people
00:20:33.720 who were obviously lying.
00:20:35.220 So,
00:20:35.500 that was an operation.
00:20:37.120 So,
00:20:37.680 that was an exception,
00:20:38.860 I guess.
00:20:41.000 All right.
00:20:42.620 So,
00:20:43.160 here's how you
00:20:43.980 do
00:20:44.880 a hoax.
00:20:46.140 first you get
00:20:50.000 your anonymous sources,
00:20:51.660 check.
00:20:53.220 Then,
00:20:53.780 you make sure
00:20:54.380 that the timing
00:20:55.380 of your fake story
00:20:56.320 is just perfect.
00:20:57.980 This was perfect timing
00:20:59.260 because Garland
00:21:00.160 had just failed.
00:21:01.880 January 6th hearings
00:21:02.900 had completely failed.
00:21:04.920 The,
00:21:05.220 you know,
00:21:05.440 basically,
00:21:06.140 everything that they
00:21:07.040 had asserted
00:21:07.740 had failed,
00:21:08.340 including the FBI raid.
00:21:09.760 So,
00:21:10.100 they were at their
00:21:10.620 deepest hole
00:21:11.340 and just in time,
00:21:14.080 just in time,
00:21:15.040 an anonymous report,
00:21:16.960 which we call
00:21:17.860 the wrap-up smear,
00:21:19.940 appears.
00:21:20.920 So,
00:21:21.340 now the wrap-up smear
00:21:22.360 is in full effect,
00:21:24.060 perfectly timed,
00:21:25.120 and one of the tells
00:21:26.580 for it being
00:21:27.880 fake news
00:21:28.900 is a little too perfect.
00:21:31.660 If you were going
00:21:32.600 to make up a story
00:21:33.780 to make,
00:21:34.760 to make Trump look bad,
00:21:37.740 imagine a different topic.
00:21:40.920 What would be worse?
00:21:42.120 Trump has the
00:21:45.440 secret UFO files
00:21:47.560 in his
00:21:48.320 Mar-a-Lago.
00:21:49.960 Eh,
00:21:50.540 I'm not even sure
00:21:51.680 I'd care.
00:21:52.780 I get that it's
00:21:53.500 top secret,
00:21:54.320 but,
00:21:54.620 eh,
00:21:55.500 I don't know.
00:21:55.940 I would just think
00:21:56.500 that was funny
00:21:57.100 if I heard he had
00:21:58.740 the UFO secret files.
00:22:01.420 Or how about,
00:22:02.160 this is actually
00:22:02.680 a true thing.
00:22:03.800 The United States
00:22:05.100 was once involved
00:22:06.780 in actual research
00:22:08.020 to see if there
00:22:08.800 were any psychics
00:22:09.700 that they might
00:22:11.060 be able to weaponize.
00:22:13.120 That's a real thing.
00:22:14.400 So somewhere
00:22:14.800 there are documents
00:22:15.560 about that.
00:22:17.400 What if you heard
00:22:18.840 that was the secret
00:22:19.740 documents he had?
00:22:21.260 Again,
00:22:21.760 it might be important
00:22:22.580 if it turns out
00:22:23.620 there are any
00:22:24.180 real psychics,
00:22:25.580 I suppose.
00:22:27.860 But you would just
00:22:28.860 laugh at that,
00:22:29.540 wouldn't you?
00:22:30.460 You'd just think
00:22:30.980 it was funny.
00:22:32.420 Almost,
00:22:32.780 yeah,
00:22:33.040 what if it was like
00:22:33.900 the JFK
00:22:35.040 assassination secrets?
00:22:37.240 You would just
00:22:37.660 laugh at it.
00:22:39.340 Almost anything else
00:22:40.640 you could think of,
00:22:41.920 you'd probably
00:22:42.460 laugh it off.
00:22:43.800 It's like,
00:22:44.100 yeah,
00:22:44.320 that's a secret,
00:22:45.100 but meh.
00:22:46.200 If they told you
00:22:47.280 he had troop,
00:22:49.000 you know,
00:22:49.360 troop movements
00:22:50.260 or military readiness
00:22:51.580 stuff in his files,
00:22:53.240 what would be
00:22:53.900 the first thing
00:22:54.460 you'd think?
00:22:54.960 Why?
00:22:57.900 Why would he have that?
00:22:59.980 Why would he want
00:23:00.740 to keep it?
00:23:01.660 If somebody asked
00:23:02.620 for it back,
00:23:03.240 why would he give
00:23:03.800 it to them?
00:23:04.980 Now take that
00:23:05.820 to the nuclear
00:23:06.640 weapons secret.
00:23:08.420 Imagine this
00:23:09.120 conversation,
00:23:09.980 and then you tell
00:23:10.560 me this really
00:23:11.140 happened.
00:23:12.580 I'm going to give
00:23:13.240 you a really
00:23:13.780 on this,
00:23:14.280 okay?
00:23:15.860 Hello,
00:23:16.380 this is the
00:23:17.600 Biden administration.
00:23:19.600 We have good
00:23:20.380 information that you
00:23:21.120 have in your files.
00:23:22.040 sensitive nuclear
00:23:24.380 weapons stuff.
00:23:26.620 Can we get that
00:23:27.680 back?
00:23:29.340 And then whoever
00:23:30.140 they were talking
00:23:31.140 to said,
00:23:32.160 no, no, no, no.
00:23:33.440 We like to keep
00:23:34.500 the nuclear
00:23:35.200 weapons secrets
00:23:36.200 in a mildly
00:23:38.780 secure place
00:23:39.500 here in Mar-a-Lago.
00:23:41.560 Really?
00:23:43.580 Really.
00:23:45.140 Do you think
00:23:45.880 that the Trump
00:23:47.760 administration,
00:23:48.740 and Trump in
00:23:49.420 particular,
00:23:50.700 had been informed
00:23:51.600 that he had
00:23:52.380 in his possession
00:23:53.180 nuclear weapons
00:23:55.540 secrets
00:23:56.800 in a not
00:23:59.040 secure location,
00:24:00.560 and that he
00:24:01.800 decided to not
00:24:02.980 give them back.
00:24:05.420 That's the story
00:24:06.400 we're hearing.
00:24:07.320 That they knew
00:24:08.220 what the documents
00:24:09.040 were,
00:24:10.340 and that they knew
00:24:11.560 where they were,
00:24:12.280 and what it was
00:24:12.900 about,
00:24:13.840 and they told
00:24:14.500 the Trump people,
00:24:15.780 and then the
00:24:16.260 Trump people said,
00:24:17.100 no, we're going
00:24:18.500 to keep those
00:24:19.100 nuclear weapons
00:24:19.900 secrets right in
00:24:20.740 our storage room
00:24:21.520 here in Mar-a-Lago.
00:24:22.460 That's what we're
00:24:22.940 going to do.
00:24:24.940 Can we all,
00:24:26.200 can you play
00:24:26.720 along with me?
00:24:28.220 Give me a really
00:24:28.880 on this.
00:24:30.720 Really?
00:24:32.840 Really?
00:24:34.520 Really?
00:24:34.920 Really?
00:24:35.240 You asked for
00:24:36.160 your nuclear
00:24:37.280 secrets back,
00:24:38.940 and Trump said,
00:24:40.420 uh-uh,
00:24:41.540 I'm keeping
00:24:42.120 your nuclear
00:24:43.280 secrets.
00:24:44.560 Really?
00:24:45.620 Really?
00:24:46.680 That's actually
00:24:47.500 what they're
00:24:47.840 trying to sell
00:24:48.380 us today.
00:24:49.580 There's some
00:24:49.980 version of that
00:24:50.640 actually happened.
00:24:52.640 Really?
00:24:54.360 And let me say,
00:24:55.620 if you're
00:24:56.000 believing this
00:24:56.740 story,
00:24:58.240 based on the
00:24:59.200 ten hoaxes
00:25:00.300 that the
00:25:00.840 Democrats have
00:25:01.520 played that
00:25:02.020 follow the
00:25:02.460 same pattern,
00:25:03.800 if you're not
00:25:04.620 using this one
00:25:05.380 as your hoax
00:25:07.440 identification
00:25:08.280 filter,
00:25:09.640 you're missing
00:25:10.240 a great show.
00:25:11.460 This one,
00:25:12.220 they're signaling
00:25:12.740 way in advance.
00:25:14.400 They're telling
00:25:14.980 you,
00:25:15.780 here's a play,
00:25:16.560 we're running
00:25:17.620 an op,
00:25:18.640 it's going
00:25:19.000 to look like
00:25:19.440 all of other
00:25:20.100 fake news ops,
00:25:22.540 and here's
00:25:23.180 the playbook,
00:25:24.620 it's going to
00:25:25.100 be,
00:25:25.540 here's the
00:25:25.900 playbook,
00:25:26.640 anonymous
00:25:27.080 sources,
00:25:28.220 perfectly timed,
00:25:29.500 the story is
00:25:30.180 two on the nose,
00:25:31.160 which is what
00:25:31.560 makes people
00:25:32.060 believe it,
00:25:32.600 really.
00:25:33.300 It's not going
00:25:33.900 to be confirmed
00:25:34.400 by the reporting,
00:25:35.700 they'll amplify it,
00:25:36.600 here's the real
00:25:37.080 trick,
00:25:37.840 they're going
00:25:38.140 to do a lot
00:25:38.580 of if-it's-true
00:25:39.420 reporting.
00:25:40.940 Well,
00:25:41.340 if it's true
00:25:42.040 that Trump
00:25:42.520 has nuclear
00:25:43.280 weapons
00:25:43.980 secrets,
00:25:44.580 if it's true
00:25:46.160 that he
00:25:46.600 wouldn't give
00:25:47.340 back the
00:25:47.920 nuclear secrets,
00:25:48.940 if it's true
00:25:49.760 that he was
00:25:50.240 planning to
00:25:50.820 sell them
00:25:51.860 to a foreign
00:25:52.880 adversary,
00:25:53.800 I'm not saying
00:25:54.580 it's true,
00:25:55.320 but if it's true,
00:25:56.420 if it's true,
00:25:57.220 if it's true,
00:25:58.100 if it's true,
00:25:58.980 until their
00:26:00.080 idiot NPC base
00:26:01.500 stops hearing
00:26:02.700 if.
00:26:04.660 If will
00:26:05.340 disappear after
00:26:06.120 a while.
00:26:07.060 All they're
00:26:07.460 going to do
00:26:07.780 is turn on
00:26:08.260 the news
00:26:08.580 and hear
00:26:08.840 something about
00:26:09.460 Trump had
00:26:10.220 nuclear secrets
00:26:11.100 and wouldn't
00:26:11.420 give them
00:26:11.680 back.
00:26:12.720 That's all
00:26:13.100 they're going
00:26:13.340 to hear.
00:26:13.560 And they're
00:26:14.540 going to
00:26:14.680 believe it.
00:26:16.240 All right?
00:26:17.060 So we're
00:26:17.840 into the
00:26:18.320 amplified
00:26:18.820 if-it-is-true
00:26:19.800 stage,
00:26:20.480 but what is
00:26:21.200 the final
00:26:21.660 stage?
00:26:23.100 What's the
00:26:23.740 final stage
00:26:24.480 of the
00:26:25.560 wrap-up
00:26:27.620 smear?
00:26:30.700 The final
00:26:31.500 phase always
00:26:32.080 looks the
00:26:32.500 same.
00:26:33.700 Someday
00:26:34.180 you'll find
00:26:34.660 out that it
00:26:35.160 was fake
00:26:35.640 and it
00:26:36.940 will be
00:26:37.220 too late,
00:26:38.300 just like
00:26:39.240 the Mueller
00:26:39.580 report.
00:26:40.260 So you
00:26:40.600 can call
00:26:40.900 it the
00:26:41.220 Mueller
00:26:41.460 report
00:26:41.940 phase,
00:26:42.420 where you
00:26:43.180 find out
00:26:43.580 the whole
00:26:43.880 thing was
00:26:44.240 a hoax,
00:26:45.380 but it's
00:26:46.140 so deeply
00:26:46.680 embedded in
00:26:47.340 the mind
00:26:48.160 of the
00:26:48.420 public that
00:26:49.700 the hoaxers
00:26:50.420 can say,
00:26:51.480 but we
00:26:51.960 proved it
00:26:52.420 was true.
00:26:53.700 And then
00:26:53.980 you say,
00:26:54.720 well, you
00:26:55.240 actually proved
00:26:55.800 there was no
00:26:56.380 Russia collusion.
00:26:57.880 Well, look at
00:26:58.620 all this Russian
00:26:59.220 interference.
00:27:00.840 No, we were
00:27:01.220 talking about
00:27:01.640 Russia collusion,
00:27:03.280 as in Trump
00:27:03.860 colluding with
00:27:04.620 Russia.
00:27:05.480 That's not
00:27:06.140 Russian
00:27:06.420 interference.
00:27:06.860 Yeah, nice
00:27:09.660 try, nice
00:27:10.740 try.
00:27:11.140 I go, nice
00:27:11.920 try?
00:27:13.180 Are you
00:27:13.700 saying those
00:27:14.100 are not
00:27:14.360 different
00:27:14.700 topics?
00:27:15.920 One is
00:27:16.380 Russia
00:27:16.700 interfering in
00:27:17.660 a trivial
00:27:18.520 way every
00:27:19.180 year, like
00:27:19.700 they always
00:27:20.040 do, every
00:27:20.800 election.
00:27:21.860 And the
00:27:22.160 other is a
00:27:23.420 presidential
00:27:23.780 candidate
00:27:24.480 colluding with
00:27:26.340 a dictator
00:27:26.880 against the
00:27:28.260 United States.
00:27:29.360 Those are
00:27:29.920 not close.
00:27:31.740 Ha ha ha.
00:27:32.720 What about
00:27:33.240 Manafort?
00:27:33.700 Manafort?
00:27:34.900 Okay, again,
00:27:36.840 yeah, Manafort
00:27:37.980 showed some
00:27:38.800 internal polling
00:27:39.740 stuff to a
00:27:41.400 Russian, which
00:27:42.020 probably had no
00:27:42.660 value whatsoever
00:27:43.400 to the Russian,
00:27:44.600 and that was
00:27:45.960 bad, and he
00:27:46.500 went to jail
00:27:46.920 for it.
00:27:47.780 But none of
00:27:48.340 that is Trump
00:27:49.660 colluding.
00:27:51.300 Ha ha ha.
00:27:52.760 What about
00:27:53.540 the troll farm?
00:27:55.020 Yeah, again,
00:27:55.580 the troll farm
00:27:56.240 is not collusion.
00:27:58.080 That would be
00:27:58.740 Russian interference
00:27:59.580 on a very, very
00:28:00.400 small scale,
00:28:02.040 like always.
00:28:02.780 What about
00:28:04.500 Russia hacking
00:28:06.440 the emails,
00:28:07.260 like Trump
00:28:08.240 asked?
00:28:09.940 There's no
00:28:10.600 evidence of
00:28:11.260 that at all.
00:28:13.300 Your government
00:28:13.920 told you that
00:28:14.600 they caught
00:28:15.040 somebody, right?
00:28:16.660 Would you
00:28:17.120 believe the
00:28:17.740 government when
00:28:18.700 they told you
00:28:19.160 they caught
00:28:19.520 the hacker?
00:28:20.680 That is not
00:28:21.460 even slightly
00:28:22.040 believable.
00:28:23.380 We don't have
00:28:23.900 a government
00:28:24.280 that tells us
00:28:24.920 the truth about
00:28:25.600 that kind of
00:28:26.420 stuff.
00:28:27.320 Not even
00:28:27.960 close.
00:28:29.440 So it might
00:28:30.340 be true, but
00:28:31.660 we don't have a
00:28:32.260 government that
00:28:32.700 you could
00:28:32.940 believe about
00:28:33.700 that kind
00:28:34.460 of stuff.
00:28:35.200 I mean,
00:28:35.400 that's exactly
00:28:36.060 the stuff
00:28:36.480 they lie
00:28:36.800 about.
00:28:39.140 Anyway,
00:28:40.400 so in the
00:28:41.100 final phase,
00:28:43.060 we'll find
00:28:43.800 out it was
00:28:44.120 all bullshit
00:28:44.960 and a wrap-up
00:28:45.800 smear,
00:28:46.520 but by then
00:28:47.080 it will be
00:28:47.380 too late.
00:28:49.040 And I want
00:28:49.580 to do some
00:28:49.940 of this,
00:28:51.120 so even the
00:28:51.960 Midas Touch
00:28:52.660 Twitter feed
00:28:54.060 already started
00:28:55.340 the what-if.
00:28:56.860 Was Donald
00:28:57.520 Trump trying
00:28:58.540 to sell
00:28:58.940 intelligence about
00:28:59.880 nuclear weapons
00:29:00.820 to foreign
00:29:01.300 adversaries?
00:29:02.600 What if?
00:29:03.620 What if?
00:29:05.840 I wanted to
00:29:07.020 tweet my own
00:29:07.600 what-if today,
00:29:09.100 and it goes
00:29:09.540 like this.
00:29:10.680 Is Joe Biden
00:29:11.740 a human being
00:29:13.140 or an abandoned
00:29:14.440 bird's nest?
00:29:15.700 What if he's an
00:29:16.740 abandoned bird's nest
00:29:17.720 and he got elected
00:29:18.420 president?
00:29:19.020 What if?
00:29:19.720 What if we have
00:29:20.480 an abandoned
00:29:20.940 bird's nest as a
00:29:21.880 president?
00:29:22.500 What if?
00:29:23.020 There's a lot
00:29:33.160 of fun stuff
00:29:33.740 happening today.
00:29:35.920 I love the
00:29:36.660 fact that even
00:29:37.180 CNN doesn't
00:29:37.960 believe the
00:29:38.380 Washington Post
00:29:39.020 report.
00:29:40.720 So here's
00:29:41.600 how CNN
00:29:42.380 launders the
00:29:44.360 fake news.
00:29:46.020 So who
00:29:46.500 is CNN?
00:29:47.340 Let's see if
00:29:47.740 you can guess
00:29:48.280 this before I
00:29:48.900 tell you.
00:29:50.120 So CNN
00:29:50.700 hears this
00:29:51.340 Washington Post
00:29:52.080 report that
00:29:52.720 has two
00:29:53.060 anonymous sources
00:29:53.900 and even
00:29:54.820 CNN knows
00:29:55.560 that's bullshit.
00:29:57.120 Right?
00:29:58.060 Don't you think
00:29:58.780 that the
00:29:59.120 professionals at
00:29:59.940 CNN, the
00:30:00.440 actual news
00:30:01.060 people, don't
00:30:02.160 you think Jake
00:30:02.900 Tapper looked
00:30:03.500 at two
00:30:04.000 anonymous sources
00:30:04.840 in the
00:30:05.200 Washington Post
00:30:05.920 at exactly
00:30:06.940 the right
00:30:07.340 time?
00:30:08.320 Do you think
00:30:08.740 Jake Tapper
00:30:09.360 thought, oh
00:30:09.960 that's true?
00:30:12.140 My guess is
00:30:13.160 he thought it
00:30:13.600 might be true
00:30:14.180 because anything
00:30:14.840 might be true
00:30:15.420 these days.
00:30:16.180 But do you
00:30:16.640 think he
00:30:16.920 bought that?
00:30:18.360 No.
00:30:19.300 No.
00:30:19.860 No, I
00:30:20.280 think whatever
00:30:21.180 you want to
00:30:21.660 say about
00:30:22.080 Jake Tapper
00:30:22.680 and I'll
00:30:22.900 just use
00:30:23.300 him as
00:30:23.740 an example.
00:30:24.580 He's very
00:30:24.960 smart, he's
00:30:26.340 very experienced,
00:30:27.800 he knows what
00:30:28.640 real news
00:30:29.160 looks like.
00:30:30.660 And he
00:30:31.260 knows what
00:30:31.620 the fake
00:30:31.980 stuff looks
00:30:32.480 like.
00:30:33.560 Maybe not
00:30:34.520 100%
00:30:35.120 agreement with
00:30:35.860 what my
00:30:36.560 opinion is,
00:30:37.320 but he
00:30:37.660 knows what
00:30:38.020 it looks
00:30:38.280 like for
00:30:38.920 the most
00:30:39.220 part.
00:30:40.480 And two
00:30:41.140 anonymous
00:30:41.580 reports from
00:30:42.340 the Washington
00:30:42.880 Post with a
00:30:43.720 long history
00:30:44.240 of fake
00:30:44.600 news, that
00:30:45.840 doesn't look
00:30:46.360 real because
00:30:47.580 of the timing
00:30:48.020 and the
00:30:48.520 perfect nature
00:30:49.480 of it,
00:30:49.840 etc.
00:30:50.900 So the
00:30:51.700 CNN has
00:30:52.580 this problem.
00:30:53.320 They would
00:30:53.600 love to
00:30:54.060 report the
00:30:54.680 story, but
00:30:56.000 it doesn't
00:30:56.440 pass even
00:30:56.980 their own
00:30:57.500 sniff test.
00:30:58.840 So, who
00:31:00.020 do they
00:31:00.380 assign the
00:31:01.040 story to?
00:31:02.720 Go.
00:31:03.900 Who at
00:31:04.340 CNN do they
00:31:05.140 assign the
00:31:05.640 story to if
00:31:06.460 the news
00:31:06.920 people know
00:31:07.580 it's bullshit?
00:31:08.060 Let's say
00:31:14.240 for writing.
00:31:16.340 I guess I
00:31:17.080 should have
00:31:17.460 said for
00:31:17.780 writing.
00:31:19.180 Not for
00:31:19.660 on-screen.
00:31:20.520 On-screen,
00:31:21.860 stelter, yes.
00:31:23.000 Stelter.
00:31:24.200 But an
00:31:24.560 opinion.
00:31:24.980 What opinion
00:31:25.700 person would
00:31:26.260 they assign
00:31:26.640 to it?
00:31:28.660 So,
00:31:29.000 is this
00:31:29.280 somebody
00:31:29.540 says?
00:31:33.360 I've
00:31:33.840 told you
00:31:34.160 this so
00:31:34.480 many times.
00:31:36.040 It's
00:31:36.200 Stephen
00:31:36.480 Collinson.
00:31:37.920 Yeah.
00:31:38.520 Stephen
00:31:38.920 Collinson
00:31:39.340 apparently is
00:31:40.360 the one who
00:31:40.700 will say
00:31:40.980 anything.
00:31:42.280 If it's
00:31:42.920 reported in
00:31:43.680 any way,
00:31:44.800 he's going
00:31:45.200 to run
00:31:45.460 with it.
00:31:46.320 Now, he's
00:31:46.760 not saying,
00:31:47.500 I don't
00:31:47.800 think he's
00:31:48.220 saying it's
00:31:48.520 a fact,
00:31:49.740 but I
00:31:51.360 don't think
00:31:51.800 you could
00:31:52.140 get a
00:31:52.480 news person
00:31:53.080 to touch
00:31:53.600 this story
00:31:54.220 except to
00:31:55.980 report that
00:31:56.620 it's being
00:31:56.940 reported.
00:31:58.120 But if you
00:31:58.860 want to
00:31:59.160 give it a
00:31:59.840 little life,
00:32:01.220 make it
00:32:01.820 seem like
00:32:02.440 there's a
00:32:02.980 little more
00:32:03.300 substance to
00:32:04.000 it,
00:32:04.520 you give
00:32:04.880 it to
00:32:05.100 Stephen
00:32:05.360 Collinson
00:32:05.780 because he'll
00:32:06.260 write anything
00:32:06.760 apparently.
00:32:07.220 I can't
00:32:09.240 read his
00:32:09.520 mind,
00:32:10.400 but if I
00:32:10.760 look at
00:32:11.040 his work,
00:32:12.000 all of the
00:32:12.600 sketchiest stuff
00:32:13.400 comes from
00:32:13.780 the same
00:32:14.060 guy.
00:32:15.080 If it's
00:32:15.660 completely
00:32:16.400 speculative,
00:32:17.680 or it's
00:32:18.320 already been
00:32:18.780 debunked,
00:32:19.500 or there's a
00:32:20.080 major piece of
00:32:20.860 context missing,
00:32:22.180 who do they
00:32:22.740 give it to?
00:32:23.760 Stephen
00:32:24.140 Collinson.
00:32:24.500 so you should
00:32:25.720 recognize that
00:32:26.420 name.
00:32:27.300 Because when
00:32:27.920 you see him
00:32:28.320 writing about
00:32:28.880 it, but it's
00:32:29.340 not being
00:32:29.700 reported by
00:32:30.280 the news
00:32:30.740 people, even
00:32:31.360 as true,
00:32:33.040 that's a
00:32:34.500 tip-off.
00:32:36.840 So get to
00:32:37.740 know the
00:32:38.200 actual
00:32:38.520 individuals.
00:32:40.240 If you
00:32:40.860 thought that
00:32:41.320 Maggie Haberman
00:32:42.120 was a source
00:32:43.500 of actual
00:32:44.020 news, you
00:32:45.300 need to learn
00:32:45.800 who the
00:32:46.080 players are.
00:32:47.740 There are
00:32:48.860 some people
00:32:49.360 who are more
00:32:50.460 close to a
00:32:51.160 punchline.
00:32:51.640 If they
00:32:54.220 bring Carl
00:32:54.820 Bernstein on
00:32:55.680 to say
00:32:56.600 something is
00:32:57.120 worse than
00:32:57.640 Watergate, you
00:32:58.880 shouldn't take
00:32:59.320 any of that
00:32:59.860 seriously.
00:33:00.560 That's just a
00:33:01.040 punchline.
00:33:02.360 That's closer
00:33:03.100 to a joke
00:33:03.780 than it is
00:33:04.320 to news.
00:33:07.820 All right.
00:33:11.540 Rasmussen is
00:33:12.280 reporting that
00:33:12.960 the generic
00:33:15.300 Republican versus
00:33:16.220 the generic
00:33:16.840 Democrat for
00:33:17.700 the midterms
00:33:18.360 is down to
00:33:19.460 a 3%
00:33:20.340 advantage.
00:33:21.640 for
00:33:22.040 Republicans.
00:33:23.020 Now, a 3%
00:33:23.760 advantage in a
00:33:24.660 generic race, I
00:33:26.440 feel like, is
00:33:27.460 basically no
00:33:28.220 difference, because
00:33:29.460 I don't think
00:33:29.960 these polls are
00:33:30.960 accurate enough to
00:33:31.720 pick up a
00:33:32.900 three-point
00:33:33.400 difference.
00:33:34.760 And you've
00:33:34.980 got 8%
00:33:35.600 who are
00:33:35.780 undecided, who
00:33:37.380 are probably
00:33:37.800 not undecided.
00:33:39.600 So, basically,
00:33:41.020 it looks like a
00:33:41.840 tie going into
00:33:43.260 the election.
00:33:44.520 So I'm not
00:33:45.000 entirely sure why
00:33:45.900 people are so
00:33:46.720 sure it's going
00:33:47.200 to be a red
00:33:47.580 wave, except
00:33:48.960 that it feels
00:33:49.620 like it.
00:33:51.640 Stefan
00:33:53.340 collusion.
00:33:54.240 That's pretty
00:33:54.580 funny.
00:33:58.200 Yeah.
00:34:00.120 So I
00:34:00.880 wouldn't, I
00:34:01.720 would feel a
00:34:02.380 little bit
00:34:02.820 concerned if I
00:34:03.780 were Republican
00:34:04.380 thinking that this
00:34:05.360 election is going
00:34:06.020 to be easy and
00:34:07.000 it'll be a red
00:34:07.780 sweep.
00:34:08.040 I don't see it
00:34:09.060 in the data.
00:34:14.660 It's telling
00:34:15.240 you that they
00:34:15.780 are.
00:34:17.160 Oh, YouTube
00:34:17.920 just, I lost
00:34:18.700 my connection.
00:34:22.120 Hello, YouTube.
00:34:23.700 I lost you there
00:34:24.420 for a minute, but
00:34:24.980 you're back.
00:34:28.720 All right.
00:34:29.220 What else we
00:34:34.240 got going on
00:34:34.800 here?
00:34:34.980 Well, that's
00:34:35.260 the main
00:34:35.480 thing.
00:34:37.060 So Trump
00:34:37.720 is encouraging
00:34:39.380 the release
00:34:40.000 of the
00:34:40.260 documents, but
00:34:41.040 of course, he's
00:34:41.580 talking about
00:34:42.020 different documents
00:34:42.920 than the
00:34:44.280 Attorney General
00:34:44.800 is, so they
00:34:46.000 can both be
00:34:46.640 asking, oh, I
00:34:47.700 just lost YouTube
00:34:48.380 again.
00:34:49.920 Interesting.
00:34:50.660 Let's see if I
00:34:51.080 can reconnect.
00:34:52.880 Hello, YouTube.
00:34:53.840 You're back.
00:34:54.300 Interesting.
00:34:58.420 Having a little
00:34:58.840 trouble on
00:34:59.320 YouTube.
00:35:00.420 Do you want
00:35:00.980 to bet that
00:35:01.740 this stream
00:35:02.360 will be
00:35:02.820 difficult to
00:35:03.900 download?
00:35:05.140 How much
00:35:05.740 do you want
00:35:05.940 to bet?
00:35:07.480 So there
00:35:08.500 are some
00:35:08.840 topics which
00:35:10.240 when I do
00:35:10.740 them on
00:35:11.260 YouTube, it
00:35:12.440 seems like
00:35:12.920 there's a
00:35:13.280 coincidence that
00:35:14.380 it has
00:35:15.180 technical
00:35:15.640 problems and
00:35:16.280 it's hard to
00:35:16.720 download and
00:35:17.540 stuff like
00:35:18.560 that.
00:35:19.540 I feel like
00:35:20.320 this is one
00:35:20.760 of those
00:35:20.980 cases.
00:35:22.260 Because this
00:35:22.920 is one of
00:35:23.240 those cases
00:35:23.700 that completely
00:35:24.280 changes
00:35:24.840 civilization.
00:35:26.680 And I am
00:35:27.440 the strongest
00:35:27.920 voice on
00:35:28.540 this topic.
00:35:30.420 Let me say
00:35:31.020 it again.
00:35:32.200 This question
00:35:33.100 of the
00:35:34.080 Mar-a-Lago
00:35:34.620 documents is
00:35:36.460 the most
00:35:36.900 important question
00:35:37.820 in civilization
00:35:38.660 because it
00:35:39.920 will determine
00:35:40.520 whether Trump
00:35:41.140 becomes president
00:35:41.840 or not.
00:35:42.700 Probably.
00:35:43.480 I mean, I'm
00:35:44.620 making a lot
00:35:45.160 of assumptions
00:35:46.240 here that
00:35:47.180 that's going
00:35:47.700 to be the
00:35:48.000 biggest factor.
00:35:48.900 But it
00:35:49.380 might be the
00:35:49.760 biggest factor
00:35:50.300 in the world
00:35:51.780 right now.
00:35:53.220 And I
00:35:55.220 am literally
00:35:56.020 the strongest
00:35:56.820 voice persuading
00:35:58.800 you to
00:36:00.800 understand that
00:36:01.400 it's bullshit.
00:36:04.820 So what are
00:36:05.700 they going to
00:36:05.980 do to me?
00:36:06.820 You should
00:36:07.540 expect that
00:36:08.800 the fury
00:36:10.040 that's coming
00:36:10.600 after me
00:36:11.220 will be
00:36:11.900 heightened
00:36:12.520 today.
00:36:13.740 Now, I'm
00:36:14.840 going to tag
00:36:15.320 everybody as
00:36:15.940 an NPC that
00:36:16.960 comes after me
00:36:17.580 with a cartoon
00:36:18.280 joke or tries
00:36:20.200 to dismiss
00:36:20.760 me because
00:36:21.500 of my stepson
00:36:22.320 situation or
00:36:23.140 something like
00:36:23.420 that.
00:36:23.940 So I'm going
00:36:24.460 to do
00:36:24.660 hashtag NPC
00:36:25.620 and all
00:36:26.020 those.
00:36:27.000 So later
00:36:27.560 today, if you
00:36:28.320 want to search
00:36:29.380 for the hashtag
00:36:30.080 NPCs, you
00:36:31.280 can see how
00:36:31.780 similar their
00:36:32.580 comments are.
00:36:34.240 They're completely
00:36:35.400 uncreative.
00:36:36.720 You can also
00:36:37.260 see I'm
00:36:37.880 hashtagging a
00:36:38.620 lot of them
00:36:38.960 with artists.
00:36:40.680 The number
00:36:41.420 of failed
00:36:42.020 writers who
00:36:42.640 are coming
00:36:42.980 after me
00:36:43.460 today, it's
00:36:44.780 really hilarious.
00:36:45.500 So I try to
00:36:47.080 call them
00:36:47.440 out when I
00:36:47.780 can.
00:36:48.240 And even
00:36:48.620 the ones
00:36:48.940 who don't
00:36:49.320 say they're
00:36:49.860 writers, it
00:36:50.560 looks like
00:36:50.920 they are.
00:36:52.380 You can tell
00:36:53.360 there's an
00:36:54.340 indication that
00:36:55.080 they're trying
00:36:55.520 to be a
00:36:55.920 writer.
00:36:58.080 So failed
00:36:59.080 writers and
00:37:02.080 NPCs are all
00:37:03.020 coming after me
00:37:03.600 today.
00:37:04.420 So watch
00:37:05.100 that show.
00:37:05.960 Now, let me
00:37:06.520 ask you this.
00:37:08.640 Could you do
00:37:09.380 what I'm
00:37:09.680 doing?
00:37:12.280 Have you
00:37:12.760 ever spent
00:37:13.120 any time
00:37:13.500 looking at
00:37:14.240 the social
00:37:14.700 media
00:37:15.060 reaction I
00:37:15.780 get?
00:37:16.660 The number
00:37:17.300 of people
00:37:17.740 who come
00:37:18.940 after me
00:37:19.420 personally and
00:37:20.180 very, very
00:37:21.720 personal.
00:37:23.160 So every
00:37:24.000 day I get
00:37:25.060 to read
00:37:25.600 that somebody
00:37:26.780 thinks I
00:37:27.300 killed my
00:37:27.820 own step
00:37:28.320 child through
00:37:29.720 neglect or
00:37:30.580 something.
00:37:31.280 Every day.
00:37:32.260 Every day I
00:37:32.840 get somebody
00:37:33.380 to tell me
00:37:33.860 that I
00:37:34.140 killed my
00:37:34.540 own step
00:37:34.920 child.
00:37:36.300 Could you
00:37:36.720 do that?
00:37:39.440 It's hard,
00:37:40.540 right?
00:37:40.980 But I
00:37:41.440 can.
00:37:42.940 And you
00:37:43.520 know why I'm
00:37:43.920 doing it for
00:37:44.440 you?
00:37:45.620 Because I'm
00:37:46.240 doing this
00:37:46.640 basically for
00:37:47.300 you.
00:37:48.940 Because I
00:37:49.600 can.
00:37:50.780 Because I
00:37:51.300 can.
00:37:52.140 If you
00:37:52.720 could, I
00:37:54.560 would damn
00:37:55.020 well expect
00:37:55.580 you to do
00:37:56.000 it.
00:37:57.440 Right?
00:37:58.320 If you
00:37:58.900 could do
00:37:59.320 what I'm
00:37:59.680 doing, you
00:38:01.040 could debunk
00:38:01.580 these things
00:38:02.120 at the
00:38:02.620 gigantic
00:38:03.540 personal risk
00:38:04.400 at a huge
00:38:05.100 expense.
00:38:06.180 Do you
00:38:06.360 know how
00:38:06.560 much this
00:38:06.880 cost me?
00:38:07.860 You have
00:38:08.460 no idea
00:38:09.040 how expensive
00:38:09.740 this is.
00:38:10.660 This is
00:38:11.100 tens of
00:38:11.540 millions of
00:38:11.960 dollars this
00:38:12.440 cost me
00:38:12.860 personally.
00:38:14.220 Tens of
00:38:14.780 millions.
00:38:15.920 That's how
00:38:16.440 much I
00:38:16.880 would have
00:38:17.280 made if I
00:38:18.240 had never
00:38:18.540 talked about
00:38:19.080 Trump.
00:38:19.920 Like the
00:38:20.340 extra amount.
00:38:21.180 It completely
00:38:21.720 devastated my
00:38:23.480 entire business
00:38:24.220 model.
00:38:25.680 So could
00:38:27.020 you do
00:38:27.320 that?
00:38:28.280 You could
00:38:28.780 not.
00:38:29.500 Most of you
00:38:30.040 could not.
00:38:30.820 And I
00:38:31.080 wouldn't even
00:38:31.400 ask you to
00:38:31.980 because it
00:38:32.480 would be too
00:38:32.960 much to ask.
00:38:34.400 But I
00:38:34.780 could do it.
00:38:35.240 So it's
00:38:36.780 sort of
00:38:37.040 like jumping
00:38:38.620 on the
00:38:38.960 hand grenade
00:38:39.340 thing.
00:38:40.780 Sometimes
00:38:41.220 you're the
00:38:41.860 hero because
00:38:42.460 you jumped
00:38:42.880 on the
00:38:43.160 hand grenade
00:38:43.540 and you
00:38:44.160 saved the
00:38:45.180 platoon.
00:38:46.380 But here's
00:38:47.320 the question
00:38:47.720 that must
00:38:48.040 be asked.
00:38:49.520 Wouldn't it
00:38:50.100 have been the
00:38:50.600 closest person
00:38:51.300 to the
00:38:51.600 hand grenade?
00:38:53.340 Maybe the
00:38:54.000 entire platoon
00:38:54.640 would have
00:38:55.080 been willing
00:38:55.480 to jump
00:38:55.880 on the
00:38:56.100 hand grenade.
00:38:57.360 But there
00:38:58.020 was only
00:38:58.280 one person
00:38:58.740 close.
00:38:59.340 So the
00:38:59.840 closest person
00:39:00.580 jumped on it,
00:39:01.480 died,
00:39:01.920 saved the
00:39:02.300 platoon.
00:39:02.540 I feel
00:39:03.920 like I'm
00:39:04.240 just the
00:39:04.540 closest person
00:39:05.220 to the
00:39:05.460 hand grenade.
00:39:06.800 I feel
00:39:07.200 like if
00:39:07.560 you were
00:39:07.860 in my
00:39:08.160 position,
00:39:08.720 you would
00:39:08.980 do what
00:39:09.240 I'm
00:39:09.400 doing.
00:39:10.780 And you
00:39:11.040 would also
00:39:12.140 take the
00:39:13.520 expense and
00:39:14.760 you would
00:39:14.980 take the
00:39:15.300 hit.
00:39:16.200 Because you
00:39:17.500 could.
00:39:18.440 So in this
00:39:18.980 scenario, if
00:39:19.820 you could do
00:39:20.400 it, you
00:39:20.640 would.
00:39:22.120 Do you
00:39:22.520 know there's
00:39:23.520 a movie
00:39:23.880 out about
00:39:24.560 the rescue
00:39:26.760 of those
00:39:27.460 people who
00:39:28.220 were trapped
00:39:28.620 in the
00:39:28.960 underwater
00:39:29.400 cave?
00:39:30.540 I don't
00:39:30.820 remember the
00:39:31.560 full details.
00:39:32.040 But there
00:39:32.740 was one
00:39:33.060 part where
00:39:33.640 an experienced
00:39:35.000 diver did
00:39:36.420 something almost
00:39:37.840 impossible, like
00:39:39.220 went through
00:39:39.680 this tunnel,
00:39:41.460 cave, just
00:39:43.640 the deadliest
00:39:44.320 thing you could
00:39:44.840 possibly imagine
00:39:45.700 and saved
00:39:46.400 everybody.
00:39:47.880 Now, what
00:39:49.080 do you say
00:39:49.440 about that
00:39:49.940 person?
00:39:51.560 The reason
00:39:52.420 that person
00:39:52.960 did it, do
00:39:53.480 you think
00:39:53.680 they wanted
00:39:54.080 to?
00:39:55.340 Do you
00:39:55.960 think the
00:39:56.260 person who
00:39:56.800 rescued them
00:39:57.320 wanted to
00:39:58.060 sign up for
00:39:58.540 that fucking
00:39:59.000 job?
00:39:59.900 No.
00:40:00.940 That person
00:40:01.500 did it
00:40:01.920 because, one
00:40:02.760 reason, one
00:40:04.180 reason, because
00:40:06.140 he could, because
00:40:08.440 he could.
00:40:09.520 That's very
00:40:10.260 powerful, because
00:40:12.740 he could.
00:40:13.940 Once you find
00:40:14.840 yourself in that
00:40:15.440 situation, that
00:40:17.320 you're the only
00:40:18.340 one who can do
00:40:18.940 it, you just
00:40:20.420 have to.
00:40:21.980 You know, you
00:40:23.180 can get Kel the
00:40:23.980 hero because you
00:40:26.060 did it.
00:40:26.880 But the fact is,
00:40:27.940 you don't have a
00:40:28.340 choice.
00:40:29.560 If you think I
00:40:30.400 feel like I
00:40:30.960 have a choice, I
00:40:32.160 really don't.
00:40:33.400 Like, it doesn't
00:40:34.060 feel optional.
00:40:35.120 I feel like I
00:40:35.860 have to do it
00:40:36.400 because I can.
00:40:39.280 And that's it.
00:40:40.040 That's the whole
00:40:40.960 story.
00:40:42.120 I'm an
00:40:42.480 American.
00:40:44.160 I'm a citizen
00:40:45.280 of Earth.
00:40:46.260 I'm a human
00:40:47.080 being.
00:40:48.180 I live with other
00:40:49.260 citizens who I
00:40:50.420 appreciate and
00:40:51.600 value.
00:40:52.940 Then you put me
00:40:53.540 in this situation.
00:40:54.960 What am I going
00:40:55.640 to do?
00:40:56.680 I don't have a
00:40:57.460 choice.
00:40:58.580 I'm going to do
00:40:59.260 this.
00:41:00.760 Now, to be fair,
00:41:02.840 if it were the
00:41:03.520 difference between
00:41:04.280 I'm going to
00:41:04.860 starve or do
00:41:06.640 this, I'd
00:41:07.220 probably eat.
00:41:09.940 I don't want to
00:41:10.720 leave you with the
00:41:11.300 impression that
00:41:12.440 there's something
00:41:12.880 special about me,
00:41:14.340 but the entire
00:41:15.040 point of it is
00:41:16.500 that it's not
00:41:16.920 special.
00:41:18.060 I'm in a
00:41:18.980 coincidentally unique
00:41:20.160 situation, but it's
00:41:22.320 not special.
00:41:22.980 It's just sort of
00:41:23.740 coincidence that I
00:41:25.160 could do this
00:41:25.800 and get away
00:41:26.300 with it, and
00:41:26.680 you can't.
00:41:27.820 Well, I don't
00:41:28.260 really get away
00:41:28.780 with it.
00:41:29.120 I just don't
00:41:29.540 get completely
00:41:30.620 crushed by it.
00:41:33.460 So that's the
00:41:34.360 situation.
00:41:35.140 I deserve, in
00:41:37.180 my opinion, I
00:41:37.840 don't deserve any
00:41:38.800 kudos for taking
00:41:40.160 a risk on your
00:41:40.920 behalf because,
00:41:43.120 because you
00:41:44.140 would do it for
00:41:44.620 me.
00:41:45.960 That's what I
00:41:46.600 believe.
00:41:47.880 And really, that's
00:41:48.860 what keeps society
00:41:49.880 together, right?
00:41:51.340 The reason that I
00:41:52.600 might stop and pull
00:41:53.800 you out of a
00:41:54.440 burning truck is
00:41:56.700 because you'd do
00:41:57.160 it for me.
00:41:58.580 I don't need a
00:41:59.340 better reason.
00:42:00.680 Do I?
00:42:01.800 Do you need a
00:42:02.320 better reason?
00:42:03.220 You'd do it for
00:42:03.800 me, right?
00:42:05.520 I'll do it for
00:42:06.060 you.
00:42:06.740 That's it.
00:42:10.960 All right.
00:42:13.480 Same as Trump?
00:42:14.400 Well, I don't
00:42:14.860 know.
00:42:15.100 Maybe.
00:42:16.440 I mean, Trump
00:42:17.080 does fall into the
00:42:18.120 category of he's the
00:42:18.940 only one who can do
00:42:19.600 it.
00:42:21.620 There's very much
00:42:22.700 that going on.
00:42:24.280 And you wonder how
00:42:25.000 much that matters to
00:42:25.800 him.
00:42:27.060 You know, I feel
00:42:27.900 like, I feel
00:42:31.460 like what Trump's
00:42:33.920 doing, we kind of
00:42:35.040 owe him something in
00:42:36.180 return.
00:42:37.120 Do you ever feel
00:42:37.660 like that?
00:42:39.120 Because even though
00:42:39.940 I get, you know,
00:42:41.080 he's an egomaniac,
00:42:44.420 you know, I get
00:42:44.900 that he likes the
00:42:46.100 attention, I get
00:42:47.260 that he's doing it
00:42:47.860 for personal reasons.
00:42:49.760 I get that.
00:42:51.720 But the way he's
00:42:53.260 doing it feels
00:42:54.340 like some of that
00:42:56.400 is for us.
00:42:57.820 It feels like it.
00:42:58.680 I feel like he
00:42:59.360 thinks the fight is
00:43:00.160 real.
00:43:00.880 As much bullshit as
00:43:02.100 there is on both
00:43:02.780 sides, a lot of it
00:43:04.220 is his.
00:43:04.880 But I think he
00:43:05.620 thinks the fight is
00:43:06.500 real.
00:43:08.060 That's what I
00:43:08.500 think.
00:43:09.980 And can you
00:43:10.880 imagine anything
00:43:11.620 smarter than
00:43:12.440 retiring?
00:43:14.140 All Trump had to
00:43:15.220 do was start a
00:43:16.440 media empire,
00:43:17.180 where he could
00:43:18.240 have completely
00:43:18.980 redeemed his
00:43:19.920 brand, completely.
00:43:22.240 And I think he
00:43:23.080 knows it.
00:43:24.780 But he needed
00:43:25.640 to do this.
00:43:28.360 Now, he, you
00:43:29.380 know, it's
00:43:30.060 compatible with
00:43:30.780 his ego if he
00:43:31.600 wins.
00:43:32.980 But I think he
00:43:34.000 also feels like
00:43:35.400 there's something
00:43:35.800 he needed to
00:43:36.400 do.
00:43:37.340 That's what I
00:43:37.820 feel.
00:43:38.880 But can't read
00:43:39.960 his mind, so
00:43:40.660 we're only
00:43:40.960 guessing.
00:43:41.240 will our
00:43:46.380 country burn
00:43:47.320 when Trump
00:43:48.080 runs?
00:43:51.740 Scott's
00:43:52.340 subtext is
00:43:53.080 always, please
00:43:53.660 kill me.
00:43:54.560 What?
00:43:58.820 So, watching
00:43:59.840 the NPCs go
00:44:01.480 crazy today.
00:44:06.440 So, watch
00:44:07.320 that.
00:44:07.680 We'll make
00:44:08.200 them part of
00:44:08.600 the show.
00:44:09.240 I guess
00:44:09.560 Keith Olbermann
00:44:10.560 is tweeting
00:44:14.780 the Ezra
00:44:15.300 show today,
00:44:16.620 in which the
00:44:17.560 award for
00:44:18.300 worst person
00:44:19.060 in the world
00:44:19.620 is down to
00:44:20.980 Charlie Kirk
00:44:21.840 and me.
00:44:23.620 So, that's
00:44:24.240 why I've
00:44:24.700 designated
00:44:25.460 Keith Olbermann
00:44:26.300 as my mascot.
00:44:27.940 And I would
00:44:28.560 recommend to
00:44:29.020 you to watch
00:44:29.720 my mascot
00:44:30.260 show and
00:44:31.840 find out if
00:44:32.620 I win, or
00:44:33.460 Charlie Kirk
00:44:34.100 wins, for
00:44:35.280 worst person
00:44:36.060 in the world.
00:44:36.740 I have a
00:44:37.200 feeling it's
00:44:37.740 going to be
00:44:38.060 a tie.
00:44:39.360 I don't
00:44:39.780 know.
00:44:40.820 I feel it's
00:44:41.400 going to be
00:44:41.700 a tie.
00:44:46.080 All right.
00:44:51.300 And I
00:44:51.780 have my
00:44:52.300 ESG jokes
00:44:53.860 are coming.
00:44:54.580 Would you
00:44:54.820 like a
00:44:55.100 preview?
00:44:59.280 Too bad.
00:45:00.020 You're only
00:45:00.280 going to see
00:45:00.580 them on
00:45:00.820 Locals.
00:45:01.160 I'm going
00:45:03.120 to show
00:45:03.320 the Locals
00:45:03.840 people what
00:45:04.780 Dilbert comics
00:45:05.900 are upcoming.
00:45:06.560 They're not
00:45:06.840 completed yet.
00:45:08.380 I can't
00:45:08.980 show them
00:45:09.320 on the
00:45:10.880 YouTube.
00:45:13.360 But I
00:45:13.660 will show
00:45:13.960 them to the
00:45:14.680 subscription
00:45:15.160 service.
00:45:15.720 They'll get
00:45:15.940 to see them
00:45:16.440 later today.
00:45:17.520 Now, they
00:45:17.740 won't be
00:45:18.060 drawn, so
00:45:18.560 you're just
00:45:18.820 going to see
00:45:19.100 the writing.
00:45:20.240 So you'll
00:45:20.480 see what's
00:45:20.800 coming.
00:45:22.040 So, and
00:45:22.680 I use them
00:45:24.260 to help me
00:45:24.660 write.
00:45:27.040 Yeah, you
00:45:27.600 know, I
00:45:27.940 really hope
00:45:28.380 that the
00:45:30.060 story about
00:45:30.620 the possible
00:45:31.240 nuclear
00:45:31.760 secrets, I
00:45:33.260 hope that
00:45:33.620 we get
00:45:34.000 50 current
00:45:35.640 and former
00:45:36.280 intelligence
00:45:36.880 agency
00:45:37.880 professionals
00:45:39.000 to say
00:45:39.640 that there
00:45:40.300 really were
00:45:40.760 nuclear
00:45:41.160 secrets
00:45:41.600 there.
00:45:42.380 Because that
00:45:43.120 would really
00:45:43.580 sell it.
00:45:46.620 Or would
00:45:47.740 that be
00:45:48.080 more proof
00:45:48.580 that is
00:45:48.840 bullshit?
00:45:50.780 All right.
00:45:51.840 Have you
00:45:52.300 also noticed
00:45:52.840 that when
00:45:53.440 they speak
00:45:53.980 about the
00:45:54.440 nuclear
00:45:54.880 weapons
00:45:55.780 secrets,
00:45:56.560 they say
00:45:56.980 related to.
00:45:59.120 Have you
00:45:59.440 caught that?
00:46:00.620 Related to
00:46:01.600 nuclear weapons.
00:46:03.600 Give me an
00:46:04.360 example of
00:46:04.900 some things
00:46:05.340 that are
00:46:05.640 related to
00:46:06.280 nuclear weapons.
00:46:07.280 I'll go
00:46:07.580 first.
00:46:09.920 Let me
00:46:10.500 write a
00:46:10.940 personal note
00:46:11.660 to Kim
00:46:12.140 Jong-un.
00:46:13.680 And Kim
00:46:14.140 Jong-un.
00:46:15.340 Dear
00:46:15.840 Kim Jong-un,
00:46:18.640 thank you for
00:46:19.600 your nice
00:46:20.060 notes.
00:46:21.020 Hope to see
00:46:21.700 you someday.
00:46:22.900 The United
00:46:23.360 States has
00:46:24.580 many nuclear
00:46:25.200 weapons, but
00:46:26.320 we would like
00:46:26.940 to not direct
00:46:28.180 them at
00:46:28.700 you.
00:46:29.560 Maybe we
00:46:30.080 could talk
00:46:30.700 and we
00:46:31.340 could have
00:46:31.800 all of our
00:46:32.220 nuclear weapons
00:46:33.040 maybe not
00:46:34.460 pointed toward
00:46:35.140 each other,
00:46:35.840 because I
00:46:36.420 would like
00:46:36.680 to be your
00:46:37.060 friend,
00:46:37.800 sincerely,
00:46:38.840 Donald Trump.
00:46:40.400 Is that
00:46:41.160 document
00:46:41.700 related to
00:46:43.900 nuclear weapons?
00:46:46.200 It is.
00:46:47.600 It totally
00:46:48.380 is.
00:46:50.560 You see
00:46:51.320 the trick?
00:46:51.740 I do
00:46:53.420 believe that
00:46:54.100 they will be
00:46:54.620 able to
00:46:55.020 demonstrate
00:46:55.440 that there's
00:46:56.120 something in
00:46:56.600 there about
00:46:57.080 Kim Jong-un.
00:47:00.080 See where
00:47:00.760 I'm going?
00:47:02.280 Anything that
00:47:03.240 Trump said to
00:47:04.040 Kim Jong-un
00:47:04.820 that we don't
00:47:05.440 know about
00:47:05.980 is very
00:47:07.940 likely to
00:47:09.220 include a
00:47:09.920 reference to
00:47:10.600 what we
00:47:10.960 will or
00:47:11.540 will not
00:47:11.980 do with
00:47:12.400 our nuclear
00:47:12.940 arsenal.
00:47:14.320 Am I
00:47:14.940 right?
00:47:15.900 He may
00:47:16.620 have even
00:47:16.960 made an
00:47:17.320 offer.
00:47:18.820 He may
00:47:19.260 have said,
00:47:20.260 yeah, I'm
00:47:20.620 just speculating,
00:47:21.740 but suppose
00:47:22.400 he said
00:47:23.500 something like,
00:47:24.620 you know, we
00:47:24.980 would turn
00:47:26.760 our weapons
00:47:27.240 off, you
00:47:27.960 know, if
00:47:28.560 you do the
00:47:29.000 same.
00:47:30.540 That's
00:47:30.880 something that
00:47:31.340 nobody would
00:47:31.820 want out,
00:47:32.320 right?
00:47:32.500 That would
00:47:32.720 be a top
00:47:34.160 secret nuclear
00:47:36.200 weapons related
00:47:37.240 document.
00:47:38.740 And it would
00:47:39.360 also be a
00:47:40.040 big nothing.
00:47:41.840 So here's
00:47:42.880 the thing
00:47:43.360 that I would
00:47:45.460 look for.
00:47:46.140 The most
00:47:46.620 obvious way
00:47:47.440 this is going
00:47:47.960 to go is
00:47:49.220 that there
00:47:49.560 will be
00:47:50.160 something
00:47:50.500 that's
00:47:51.440 related to
00:47:53.000 nuclear
00:47:53.400 weapons.
00:47:54.620 How much
00:47:55.160 you want
00:47:55.480 to bet
00:47:55.840 there's at
00:47:56.480 least something
00:47:56.980 in there
00:47:57.400 that they
00:47:58.200 can argue
00:47:58.800 is related.
00:48:00.920 Do you
00:48:01.340 know how
00:48:01.660 the Russian
00:48:02.700 interference
00:48:03.540 is related
00:48:06.100 to Russia
00:48:07.740 collusion,
00:48:08.540 but it's
00:48:09.500 not the
00:48:09.940 same thing?
00:48:11.380 It's just
00:48:12.060 sort of
00:48:12.360 related.
00:48:13.700 And so
00:48:13.980 that's how
00:48:14.420 they can
00:48:14.780 say later,
00:48:15.400 well, we
00:48:15.660 told you
00:48:16.100 there was
00:48:16.720 Russia
00:48:17.000 collusion,
00:48:17.840 because here
00:48:18.320 we approved
00:48:18.820 the Russia
00:48:19.320 interference.
00:48:20.880 And you
00:48:21.460 go, well,
00:48:22.060 those are
00:48:22.340 different
00:48:22.620 topics.
00:48:23.980 And then
00:48:24.260 later, we're
00:48:25.420 going to
00:48:25.600 find out
00:48:26.100 that there
00:48:26.860 was, let's
00:48:27.580 say, a
00:48:27.820 personal letter
00:48:28.460 to Kim
00:48:28.880 Jong-un,
00:48:29.700 and they're
00:48:30.640 going to
00:48:30.840 say, well,
00:48:31.620 there it
00:48:32.200 is.
00:48:33.080 There's your
00:48:33.580 nuclear weapons
00:48:34.520 related document
00:48:36.780 right there.
00:48:37.780 Because what
00:48:38.520 was the
00:48:38.900 entire
00:48:39.220 conversation
00:48:39.900 about?
00:48:40.780 Nuclear
00:48:41.240 war.
00:48:42.080 The
00:48:42.520 conversation
00:48:43.040 with Kim
00:48:43.540 Jong-un,
00:48:44.020 all of it,
00:48:44.620 is about
00:48:45.040 nuclear weapons,
00:48:46.140 even if it's
00:48:46.680 not.
00:48:47.300 It's all
00:48:47.820 about nuclear
00:48:48.300 weapons,
00:48:48.760 because that
00:48:49.020 was the
00:48:49.280 thing we
00:48:49.580 cared about.
00:48:51.260 So you
00:48:51.860 don't think
00:48:52.340 that there's
00:48:52.760 going to be
00:48:53.000 something in
00:48:53.600 there that's
00:48:54.480 related?
00:48:55.900 Yeah.
00:48:56.600 They're going
00:48:57.020 to say that
00:48:57.420 it was in
00:48:57.760 there because
00:48:58.160 there was
00:48:58.400 something
00:48:58.640 related.
00:48:59.960 Or,
00:49:00.820 point two,
00:49:02.060 they're going
00:49:02.400 to say it
00:49:03.360 was confirmed
00:49:04.160 because Adam
00:49:05.860 Schiff saw
00:49:06.920 it in the
00:49:07.320 SCIF.
00:49:09.240 So we took
00:49:10.020 those documents
00:49:10.820 that we found
00:49:11.680 at Marta Lago
00:49:12.300 and we put
00:49:12.900 them in the
00:49:13.260 SCIF.
00:49:14.060 That's the
00:49:14.620 place that you
00:49:15.320 can go look
00:49:16.100 at them,
00:49:16.480 but you
00:49:16.700 can't take
00:49:16.940 a copy.
00:49:18.300 So the
00:49:18.860 SCIF is like
00:49:19.460 a top secret
00:49:20.160 facility that
00:49:21.720 you could put
00:49:22.220 wherever you
00:49:22.980 need it.
00:49:23.380 I think there
00:49:23.740 was one
00:49:24.100 actually at
00:49:24.760 Marta Lago.
00:49:25.860 So you put
00:49:26.220 it in the
00:49:26.520 SCIF and
00:49:27.620 then you
00:49:27.880 put Schiff
00:49:28.400 in the
00:49:28.640 SCIF.
00:49:30.220 So you
00:49:30.720 got to
00:49:30.920 put Schiff
00:49:31.280 in the
00:49:31.500 SCIF and
00:49:33.060 then Schiff
00:49:33.780 will tell
00:49:35.340 you some
00:49:35.640 bullshit that
00:49:37.920 he supposedly
00:49:38.880 learned when
00:49:39.640 he put
00:49:39.980 Schiff in
00:49:41.140 the SCIF.
00:49:41.500 So it's a
00:49:42.980 Schiff
00:49:43.260 SCIF
00:49:43.840 bullshit
00:49:44.880 kind of
00:49:46.320 a play.
00:49:47.740 And then
00:49:48.060 the other
00:49:48.520 people who
00:49:49.000 were in
00:49:49.260 the
00:49:49.360 SCIF will
00:49:49.740 say,
00:49:50.380 we didn't
00:49:51.400 see anything
00:49:52.060 like that.
00:49:52.780 We looked
00:49:53.220 at the
00:49:53.500 same document
00:49:54.020 you did,
00:49:54.920 and to
00:49:55.300 say that
00:49:55.680 that's
00:49:55.940 related to
00:49:56.760 nuclear weapons
00:49:57.460 is such a
00:49:58.160 stretch that
00:49:59.100 it's closer
00:49:59.520 to a lie.
00:50:01.720 And what
00:50:02.380 will Schiff
00:50:03.460 say?
00:50:03.740 Oh, it's
00:50:05.400 right there,
00:50:05.780 I saw it with
00:50:06.160 my own eyes.
00:50:07.520 And how
00:50:07.780 many times
00:50:08.320 will we have
00:50:08.840 seen Schiff
00:50:09.360 say he saw
00:50:09.940 something with
00:50:10.440 his own
00:50:10.720 eyes,
00:50:11.580 or that
00:50:11.860 indictments
00:50:12.420 were coming,
00:50:13.060 or that
00:50:13.340 the law
00:50:13.720 had been
00:50:14.000 broken,
00:50:14.760 and they
00:50:15.260 have the
00:50:15.580 proof,
00:50:16.300 only to
00:50:16.880 later find
00:50:17.360 out none
00:50:18.220 of it was
00:50:18.580 even close
00:50:19.040 to true.
00:50:20.220 Completely
00:50:20.700 made up.
00:50:22.400 So Schiff
00:50:23.080 skiff
00:50:23.360 bullshit is
00:50:24.580 the next
00:50:24.980 phase.
00:50:26.700 Look for
00:50:27.040 Schiff
00:50:27.380 skiff
00:50:27.700 bullshit,
00:50:28.280 Schiff
00:50:28.480 skiff
00:50:28.820 bullshit,
00:50:29.800 Schiff
00:50:30.020 skiff
00:50:30.280 bullshit.
00:50:31.440 And that's
00:50:32.260 how the
00:50:32.720 left will
00:50:33.320 come to
00:50:33.720 believe that
00:50:35.080 Trump did
00:50:36.700 in fact
00:50:37.140 have
00:50:37.500 nuclear
00:50:38.120 weapons
00:50:38.620 related
00:50:39.780 stuff,
00:50:41.420 just like
00:50:41.960 they believe
00:50:42.740 that Russian
00:50:43.200 interference
00:50:44.320 proves that
00:50:45.360 there was
00:50:45.640 Russian
00:50:46.160 collusion.
00:50:48.700 So
00:50:49.080 imagine if
00:50:50.860 the government
00:50:51.540 had a
00:50:52.360 department
00:50:53.960 of
00:50:54.420 wordsmithing.
00:50:56.340 I think
00:50:57.100 Trump should
00:50:57.920 create a
00:50:58.980 cabinet
00:50:59.960 position
00:51:00.520 for defining
00:51:02.380 words the
00:51:03.140 old way.
00:51:04.960 Like every
00:51:05.280 time the
00:51:05.640 Democrats try
00:51:06.340 to tell you
00:51:06.720 that a
00:51:06.940 word
00:51:07.160 doesn't
00:51:07.480 mean like
00:51:08.060 a raid
00:51:08.460 doesn't
00:51:08.760 mean a
00:51:09.020 raid and
00:51:09.600 all this.
00:51:10.940 You just
00:51:11.200 go to
00:51:11.480 well let's
00:51:12.040 let's check
00:51:12.560 with the
00:51:12.820 cabinet.
00:51:14.040 And then
00:51:14.260 somebody comes
00:51:14.840 out
00:51:15.120 preferably be
00:51:16.220 like wearing
00:51:17.040 a long
00:51:17.400 robe so
00:51:18.480 they look
00:51:18.720 official and
00:51:19.860 they say
00:51:20.280 the definition
00:51:22.060 of raid is
00:51:22.960 as follows
00:51:23.520 and has not
00:51:24.540 been recently
00:51:25.160 changed.
00:51:26.280 And they
00:51:26.480 say well
00:51:26.820 there it
00:51:27.080 is.
00:51:28.360 The
00:51:28.520 department of
00:51:30.040 definitions
00:51:30.500 has said
00:51:31.120 that your
00:51:32.260 definition of a
00:51:33.040 raid is
00:51:33.480 incorrect.
00:51:34.480 Your
00:51:34.700 definition of
00:51:35.460 related to
00:51:36.840 collusion is
00:51:38.320 incorrect.
00:51:40.480 Yes the
00:51:41.140 shift sniff
00:51:41.580 test.
00:51:43.540 If you put
00:51:44.720 shift in the
00:51:45.340 skiff you
00:51:46.720 don't want to
00:51:47.200 sniff what
00:51:47.640 comes out.
00:51:48.960 So you don't
00:51:49.360 want to sniff
00:51:49.980 of shift in the
00:51:51.280 skiff that's for
00:51:51.940 sure.
00:51:53.020 And if
00:51:53.500 shift were to
00:51:55.480 take a shit
00:51:57.020 in the skiff
00:51:57.520 you wouldn't
00:51:59.460 want to sniff
00:51:59.900 that.
00:52:01.100 So I
00:52:03.100 think I
00:52:05.380 may be out
00:52:06.060 of material
00:52:06.480 here.
00:52:08.380 I may be
00:52:09.140 completely done
00:52:10.000 and it took me
00:52:11.000 a moment to
00:52:11.480 realize it
00:52:11.900 myself.
00:52:13.080 Apparently I
00:52:13.760 am completely
00:52:14.340 out of
00:52:14.660 material.
00:52:20.680 Comedy
00:52:21.080 gold.
00:52:22.540 Yes Dr.
00:52:23.220 Seuss would
00:52:23.580 love me.
00:52:26.080 All right I'm
00:52:26.820 going to open
00:52:27.220 it up on
00:52:27.780 YouTube for
00:52:28.560 NPC comments.
00:52:30.520 Go.
00:52:31.840 Would the
00:52:32.440 NPCs please
00:52:34.380 show up.
00:52:35.260 I'll read you
00:52:36.020 their comments
00:52:36.580 as they come.
00:52:38.080 I know you
00:52:38.640 come.
00:52:38.880 Don't hide.
00:52:39.780 Don't be shy.
00:52:41.700 Don't be shy.
00:52:43.360 Come on.
00:52:44.360 Come on.
00:52:46.280 Come on.
00:52:49.040 Come on.
00:52:49.720 Come on.
00:52:50.960 NPCs.
00:52:51.600 Come on.
00:52:52.560 Let's go.
00:52:54.280 What are you
00:52:54.640 hiding?
00:52:57.220 It seems like
00:52:57.760 all the NPCs
00:52:58.660 have suddenly
00:52:59.080 disappeared.
00:52:59.720 Well you
00:52:59.920 got really
00:53:00.260 quiet.
00:53:01.740 Where are you
00:53:02.340 now?
00:53:04.960 All gone.
00:53:06.480 Where are all
00:53:06.860 the people
00:53:07.200 saying but
00:53:08.240 but you're
00:53:10.280 like the
00:53:10.680 pointy hair
00:53:11.120 boss.
00:53:12.120 I used to
00:53:12.740 like Dilbert
00:53:13.340 but this
00:53:14.940 guy.
00:53:16.520 This guy.
00:53:16.980 So there
00:53:18.460 was somebody
00:53:20.120 who listed
00:53:20.580 themselves as
00:53:21.160 a lawyer
00:53:21.480 who came
00:53:22.860 at me on
00:53:23.500 Twitter with
00:53:24.720 just personal
00:53:25.400 insults about
00:53:26.140 what a
00:53:26.620 horrible person
00:53:27.220 I am.
00:53:28.080 And I had
00:53:28.740 to ask
00:53:29.360 because it
00:53:30.020 was a
00:53:30.240 lawyer.
00:53:31.020 Somebody who
00:53:31.580 actually is
00:53:32.120 good with
00:53:32.560 words and
00:53:33.380 understands
00:53:34.400 complicated
00:53:35.080 things.
00:53:36.220 And so I
00:53:36.560 thought well I
00:53:36.960 can finally get
00:53:37.560 an answer to
00:53:38.260 a question I
00:53:38.780 wondered.
00:53:39.960 And I
00:53:40.400 tweeted back
00:53:41.080 and I said
00:53:41.480 what is your
00:53:42.420 motivation?
00:53:43.000 Like what is
00:53:45.320 the motivation
00:53:45.900 for coming
00:53:46.440 on Twitter
00:53:46.920 and making
00:53:48.300 a personal
00:53:49.100 insult to me
00:53:49.860 without any
00:53:50.540 regard to
00:53:51.420 my point of
00:53:52.560 view or
00:53:53.220 politics or
00:53:54.000 factual anything?
00:53:55.220 Just a
00:53:55.840 pure horrible
00:53:58.060 comment about
00:53:58.900 me as a
00:53:59.380 person.
00:54:00.740 And do you
00:54:01.040 know what his
00:54:01.360 answer was?
00:54:01.980 His motivating
00:54:02.780 feeling?
00:54:05.300 His answer
00:54:06.120 was disgust.
00:54:08.020 In other
00:54:08.600 words disgust
00:54:09.620 with me and
00:54:11.020 my opinions.
00:54:12.040 Now the
00:54:12.280 part that he
00:54:12.660 is disgusted
00:54:13.320 in is never
00:54:14.560 my actual
00:54:15.180 opinion.
00:54:16.860 He's
00:54:17.380 disgusted with
00:54:18.080 something he
00:54:18.540 imagined I
00:54:19.260 said or
00:54:20.020 imagined I
00:54:20.640 believe, not
00:54:21.100 anything I
00:54:21.800 actually said.
00:54:23.900 But think
00:54:24.560 about that.
00:54:25.740 He actually
00:54:26.480 said his
00:54:27.420 motivation was
00:54:28.500 disgust.
00:54:31.160 Imagine that
00:54:31.920 being your
00:54:32.300 operating system
00:54:33.180 that you're
00:54:34.540 going through
00:54:34.940 life and
00:54:36.180 when something
00:54:36.720 disgusts you
00:54:37.660 that becomes
00:54:38.780 your activating
00:54:39.520 trigger.
00:54:40.260 do you
00:54:42.520 know what
00:54:42.740 activates me?
00:54:45.080 Good
00:54:45.640 stuff.
00:54:47.540 Or trying
00:54:48.400 to solve a
00:54:48.940 problem.
00:54:50.000 So I get
00:54:50.440 activated by
00:54:51.220 trying to
00:54:51.600 solve a
00:54:52.000 problem that's
00:54:52.700 like a real
00:54:53.080 problem or I
00:54:54.180 get activated to
00:54:55.040 do something
00:54:55.460 fun.
00:54:56.440 Oh, I'd like
00:54:57.000 to do that.
00:54:58.000 I'm totally
00:54:58.560 into that.
00:54:59.820 But here was
00:55:00.360 somebody who
00:55:00.800 admitted being
00:55:02.260 activated to
00:55:03.420 actually go
00:55:03.920 act based on
00:55:05.360 disgust being a
00:55:07.480 motivating force.
00:55:09.100 How do you
00:55:09.620 go through
00:55:09.960 life being
00:55:11.380 motivated by
00:55:12.060 disgust?
00:55:15.000 Even if you
00:55:15.820 say I'm
00:55:17.240 worthy of the
00:55:18.060 disgust, let's
00:55:19.800 say he's
00:55:20.180 right.
00:55:21.120 Let's say I'm
00:55:21.760 disgusting.
00:55:23.780 Why did he
00:55:24.620 need to tweet
00:55:25.280 at me?
00:55:26.420 Would I not
00:55:27.140 be just as
00:55:27.880 disgusting if he
00:55:28.860 tweeted or not?
00:55:30.060 Was he fixing
00:55:30.740 it?
00:55:31.420 Was it
00:55:31.840 entertainment?
00:55:33.640 Because he
00:55:34.240 didn't say it
00:55:34.640 was entertainment.
00:55:35.460 He said he
00:55:36.040 was operating on
00:55:37.200 disgust.
00:55:38.000 And the
00:55:38.240 thing is, I
00:55:39.620 don't know that
00:55:40.160 he was wrong
00:55:40.660 about that.
00:55:41.800 I think maybe
00:55:42.520 it actually was
00:55:43.520 the motivating
00:55:44.120 factor.
00:55:44.800 And if you
00:55:45.100 look at a lot
00:55:45.540 of the other
00:55:45.900 comments, the
00:55:47.460 people who are
00:55:47.980 the most angry
00:55:48.820 about me are?
00:55:51.480 What class of
00:55:52.680 people are the
00:55:53.320 most angry at
00:55:54.320 me today?
00:55:56.020 Artists.
00:55:56.780 Yeah.
00:55:57.420 People who are
00:55:58.060 not successful
00:55:58.880 enough at their
00:56:00.580 jobs and they
00:56:01.380 don't think that
00:56:01.900 the guy who
00:56:02.320 does a comic
00:56:02.880 strip should
00:56:04.200 have gotten all
00:56:04.700 the money and
00:56:05.840 success they did
00:56:06.720 because, hey,
00:56:07.480 it's just a
00:56:08.060 stupid comic
00:56:08.760 strip and so
00:56:09.460 is Garfield.
00:56:10.400 And Garfield
00:56:11.240 isn't high art,
00:56:12.740 so therefore
00:56:13.100 mine isn't, so
00:56:13.900 therefore why
00:56:14.460 aren't they more
00:56:14.980 successful?
00:56:16.480 Well, they're not
00:56:17.240 smart enough, but
00:56:18.120 that's another
00:56:18.460 story.
00:56:20.380 Yeah.
00:56:21.000 So the artists
00:56:22.420 definitely have
00:56:23.740 disgust.
00:56:25.540 The artists, when
00:56:26.700 they see me, they
00:56:27.580 are disgusted.
00:56:28.840 Because I project
00:56:30.760 some level of
00:56:32.440 success, which
00:56:34.020 really bugs you if
00:56:35.140 you don't have
00:56:35.620 it.
00:56:36.320 I've been in
00:56:37.020 that position.
00:56:38.580 I guarantee you
00:56:39.860 that before I was
00:56:40.900 successful as a
00:56:42.180 writer, I'm sure I
00:56:44.660 said horrible things
00:56:45.640 about people who
00:56:46.400 were.
00:56:47.900 I don't remember
00:56:48.780 any specific
00:56:49.380 examples, but I'm
00:56:50.760 not above it.
00:56:51.920 It's sort of a
00:56:52.680 natural instinct,
00:56:54.380 right, to have
00:56:56.200 some bad feelings
00:56:56.940 about somebody who
00:56:57.660 succeeded.
00:56:58.740 That's why the
00:57:00.000 Kardashians get so
00:57:01.100 much love and so
00:57:01.960 much hate.
00:57:02.380 The hate part is
00:57:04.620 the disgust, but
00:57:06.840 the disgust is
00:57:07.700 driven by the
00:57:08.720 contrast with
00:57:09.740 somebody doing
00:57:10.680 well and how
00:57:12.020 somebody feels
00:57:12.700 about themselves.
00:57:14.680 So if somebody's
00:57:15.380 disgusted by the
00:57:18.140 way I present an
00:57:19.120 opinion, it's
00:57:20.400 almost certainly
00:57:21.340 not about me
00:57:22.340 exactly.
00:57:24.060 It's more about
00:57:24.860 something they're
00:57:25.580 struggling with.
00:57:27.340 So if you see
00:57:28.900 somebody who's
00:57:29.400 operating out of
00:57:30.180 disgust, they're
00:57:31.500 almost certainly
00:57:32.300 coming from some
00:57:33.440 dark place.
00:57:37.760 And then the
00:57:38.520 NPCs can just
00:57:39.540 say whatever is
00:57:40.120 the most obvious
00:57:40.780 thing to say.
00:57:42.420 So in every
00:57:42.980 situation you say
00:57:43.860 to yourself, what's
00:57:44.580 the most obvious
00:57:45.200 thing to say?
00:57:46.260 If a cartoonist
00:57:47.500 that you don't
00:57:48.080 know from any
00:57:48.680 other context says
00:57:50.340 something in
00:57:50.860 politics that you
00:57:51.660 don't like, what's
00:57:52.840 the most obvious
00:57:54.000 response?
00:57:55.460 Oh, go back to
00:57:56.300 comics, comic boy.
00:57:57.420 Oh, and then
00:57:59.380 make a joke about
00:58:00.600 some unrelated
00:58:01.360 comic.
00:58:02.220 Like, oh, it's
00:58:03.400 are you done
00:58:04.340 writing Kathy?
00:58:05.760 Are you done
00:58:06.280 writing Doones
00:58:07.620 Barry?
00:58:08.260 Which one are
00:58:08.960 you?
00:58:10.980 The least
00:58:11.820 creative.
00:58:13.020 Yeah, it's the
00:58:13.600 Soylent Green
00:58:14.240 Garfield people.
00:58:16.640 I call you
00:58:17.540 baldy.
00:58:17.900 Here's an NPC.
00:58:24.620 Not really.
00:58:25.440 Other successful
00:58:26.140 people look at you
00:58:27.060 as a weirdo chasing
00:58:28.240 clout.
00:58:29.440 It's pointless what
00:58:30.260 you do.
00:58:30.900 It's pointless?
00:58:32.780 Is it pointless?
00:58:33.920 Why would so many
00:58:34.840 people come to
00:58:36.840 insult me if it's
00:58:37.720 pointless?
00:58:38.700 Like it's doing
00:58:39.300 something.
00:58:40.740 But you don't
00:58:41.340 think that teaching
00:58:43.160 people how to
00:58:44.620 read the news
00:58:46.300 more efficiently
00:58:47.700 is useful?
00:58:49.440 Just imagine
00:58:50.320 that point,
00:58:50.880 that it's
00:58:51.080 pointless.
00:58:53.980 Yeah.
00:58:54.920 You just
00:58:55.420 proved there's
00:58:55.820 a point.
00:59:07.240 Yeah, yeah,
00:59:07.960 yeah.
00:59:08.400 Okay.
00:59:09.980 Scott's waking
00:59:10.660 up.
00:59:11.060 Okay, now I
00:59:11.520 know that's a
00:59:12.000 joke, so I won't
00:59:12.660 be mad at you
00:59:13.380 anymore.
00:59:13.660 Oh, I've got
00:59:16.340 3,000 people
00:59:17.220 watching me on
00:59:17.900 YouTube.
00:59:18.680 Is that a
00:59:19.060 record?
00:59:19.660 Holy shit.
00:59:20.940 Yeah, it looks
00:59:21.400 like it's a record
00:59:22.180 audience today.
00:59:23.880 So, but no
00:59:25.360 more NPCs?
00:59:26.220 You don't want
00:59:26.540 to make yourself
00:59:27.020 known?
00:59:27.240 You know, it's
00:59:32.000 funny that
00:59:32.400 anybody would
00:59:32.920 make a comment
00:59:33.640 about somebody
00:59:34.340 using social
00:59:35.100 media and
00:59:36.520 say that it's
00:59:37.080 pointless.
00:59:38.380 It's also
00:59:39.020 weird when
00:59:40.660 people criticize
00:59:42.160 me for what I
00:59:43.220 state I'm doing.
00:59:46.040 So, so here's
00:59:47.300 somebody who says
00:59:47.960 that I'm chasing
00:59:48.620 clout.
00:59:49.700 That's what I
00:59:50.460 tell you I'm
00:59:50.960 doing.
00:59:51.880 Don't I?
00:59:53.580 Haven't I said
00:59:54.160 that directly?
00:59:55.200 Lots of times.
00:59:56.540 I've told you
00:59:57.300 that if I reach
00:59:57.940 a million followers
00:59:58.840 on Twitter, I
00:59:59.640 can run the
01:00:00.120 world.
01:00:01.560 I'm very
01:00:02.440 clearly and
01:00:03.400 intentionally and
01:00:04.500 publicly and
01:00:05.440 transparently chasing
01:00:07.000 clout.
01:00:07.960 I want more of
01:00:09.140 it because I can
01:00:10.600 do, I can do
01:00:11.440 more stuff.
01:00:12.740 Is there
01:00:13.320 somebody who
01:00:13.780 wants less
01:00:14.340 clout?
01:00:15.780 Is there
01:00:16.380 somebody who's
01:00:16.960 chasing ineffectiveness?
01:00:19.480 Is there
01:00:20.040 somebody who wakes
01:00:20.680 up in the morning
01:00:21.160 and goes, man, I
01:00:21.960 would like to
01:00:22.400 have less impact
01:00:23.180 on the world
01:00:23.800 today?
01:00:24.720 If there are
01:00:25.620 things that need
01:00:26.100 to be fixed, I
01:00:26.840 don't want to be
01:00:27.300 anywhere near that.
01:00:28.920 Get me away from
01:00:29.720 things that need to
01:00:30.360 be fixed.
01:00:31.340 Don't need any
01:00:31.980 clout.
01:00:33.200 Now, of course I'm
01:00:34.020 trying to get clout
01:00:34.840 as much as
01:00:36.420 possible.
01:00:40.240 Yeah, you're
01:00:41.420 going to have to
01:00:41.700 come up with a
01:00:42.460 much better
01:00:43.360 insult.
01:00:45.100 So here, let me
01:00:46.200 tell you the
01:00:46.580 insults I got
01:00:47.240 yesterday.
01:00:50.060 A bunch of
01:00:50.820 people making
01:00:52.040 reference to my
01:00:53.220 comic strip
01:00:54.020 one of the most
01:00:55.260 successful comic
01:00:56.200 strips in the
01:00:57.000 history of comics.
01:00:59.480 Other people
01:01:00.480 pointing out that
01:01:02.060 I have a
01:01:03.240 history of
01:01:04.300 having wild
01:01:06.120 experiences with
01:01:07.340 women who are
01:01:08.000 beautiful and much
01:01:09.520 too young for me.
01:01:11.820 No, stop saying
01:01:13.560 these mean things
01:01:14.320 about me.
01:01:15.260 But my favorite is
01:01:16.260 somebody who tweeted
01:01:17.400 my own selfie
01:01:18.600 to insult me.
01:01:21.760 To which I
01:01:22.480 thought, well, I'm
01:01:24.900 the one who
01:01:25.300 tweeted that.
01:01:26.660 I wanted you to
01:01:27.680 see that.
01:01:28.680 Because I wrote a
01:01:29.560 book about fitness.
01:01:30.900 I mean, there's a
01:01:31.540 chapter in there
01:01:32.060 about fitness.
01:01:33.040 So if you write a
01:01:34.480 book about how to
01:01:35.260 become fit and how
01:01:37.400 to have a good
01:01:37.840 diet, you better
01:01:39.120 take off your
01:01:39.700 fucking shirt.
01:01:41.480 Am I wrong?
01:01:43.100 If you're an
01:01:43.900 author and you
01:01:45.200 have a book out
01:01:45.940 right now that
01:01:47.740 purports to tell
01:01:48.980 you a system for
01:01:50.040 losing weight and
01:01:50.940 being fit, take
01:01:52.780 off your fucking
01:01:53.460 shirt.
01:01:55.140 If you don't
01:01:55.880 take off your
01:01:56.480 shirt, nobody's
01:01:57.620 going to buy your
01:01:58.140 book.
01:01:59.060 They shouldn't.
01:02:00.540 You've got to
01:02:01.120 show your work.
01:02:02.680 So, of course, I
01:02:03.940 tweeted this.
01:02:05.120 So my critics are
01:02:06.220 showing me my own
01:02:07.260 very fit body.
01:02:08.580 This was taken in
01:02:09.420 my late 50s, which
01:02:11.040 would be impressive
01:02:11.620 for anybody in their
01:02:12.360 late 50s.
01:02:13.260 I can't do this
01:02:14.040 right now.
01:02:14.500 By the way, my abs
01:02:15.820 don't look like
01:02:16.380 that right now.
01:02:17.940 But my upper
01:02:19.320 chest and shoulders
01:02:20.500 are much bigger
01:02:21.400 than this picture.
01:02:22.700 So I kind of
01:02:23.180 moved my emphasis
01:02:23.860 from abs.
01:02:25.840 I just wanted to
01:02:26.380 see if I could
01:02:26.800 develop abs.
01:02:27.920 So during this
01:02:28.560 phase, I was just
01:02:29.280 sort of seeing if
01:02:29.880 I could do it.
01:02:32.100 But people seem
01:02:33.120 to prefer arms
01:02:34.200 and shoulders and
01:02:35.060 chest.
01:02:36.320 By people, I
01:02:37.200 mean women.
01:02:38.880 So I moved my
01:02:40.380 emphasis to upper
01:02:42.260 chest and started
01:02:44.280 to get some
01:02:44.740 benefits.
01:02:45.820 Yeah, so
01:02:48.860 focusing on
01:02:50.120 shoulders, that's
01:02:50.780 correct.
01:02:53.460 All right.
01:03:00.700 And Erica says,
01:03:02.160 you're an old man
01:03:02.900 taking off his shirt,
01:03:04.180 Geraldo.
01:03:05.540 NPC.
01:03:06.780 All right, so that
01:03:07.500 was an NPC trap.
01:03:08.860 So the trap here was
01:03:10.000 that if I tell you
01:03:10.940 about taking off my
01:03:11.800 shirt, an NPC will
01:03:13.820 make a Geraldo
01:03:14.820 comment, what is
01:03:16.520 the most obvious
01:03:17.620 thing you could say
01:03:18.600 about an older male
01:03:20.120 showing off his
01:03:21.720 shirtless profile?
01:03:23.700 It's the most
01:03:24.520 obvious thing, right?
01:03:25.560 So that's how you
01:03:26.240 spot the NPCs.
01:03:27.560 They can't go beyond
01:03:28.840 the most obvious
01:03:29.700 comment.
01:03:31.100 I could do this
01:03:31.860 all day long and
01:03:32.960 attract an NPC.
01:03:34.280 So, yeah, the
01:03:37.700 Geraldo comment is
01:03:38.900 just the most
01:03:39.580 obvious thing.
01:03:40.460 And what about
01:03:41.160 when you're talking
01:03:41.700 about the safe at
01:03:42.780 Mar-a-Lago?
01:03:44.980 If you talk about
01:03:45.980 the safe at Mar-a-Lago
01:03:47.000 and you're the
01:03:48.360 nine millionth person
01:03:49.700 to say, but what if
01:03:51.060 Geraldo could open
01:03:52.240 that safe?
01:03:54.120 That's probably an
01:03:54.960 NPC.
01:03:55.820 However, if you were
01:03:57.140 the first person to
01:03:58.280 say it, or you
01:03:59.520 thought you were,
01:04:00.380 that was pretty
01:04:00.820 good.
01:04:01.800 It was a good
01:04:02.700 callback.
01:04:03.880 But if you're the
01:04:04.760 millionth person to
01:04:05.680 say it, NPC.
01:04:16.020 I should shelve my
01:04:17.240 ideas.
01:04:18.740 Oh, yeah, and also
01:04:19.420 the Putin, the Putin
01:04:20.620 on a horseback.
01:04:22.260 Yeah, the most
01:04:22.840 obvious comments.
01:04:24.880 Looks like AI has
01:04:26.100 given me some
01:04:26.660 muscles.
01:04:28.500 There's a funny
01:04:29.380 picture of me
01:04:30.160 with a fake body
01:04:31.720 over on Locals.
01:04:38.900 Alex Berenson
01:04:39.760 Twitter news.
01:04:42.220 What's happening
01:04:42.900 with Alex Berenson?
01:04:43.920 Did he get back
01:04:44.480 on Twitter?
01:04:47.340 Or is he suing
01:04:48.320 them?
01:04:48.720 Which is it?
01:04:52.880 Can somebody tell
01:04:53.740 me?
01:04:53.960 What's the Alex
01:04:54.500 Berenson story?
01:04:55.980 Both.
01:04:57.320 He's back on
01:04:58.080 Twitter and he's
01:04:58.840 suing them?
01:05:00.160 Interesting.
01:05:02.080 The government
01:05:02.580 asked Twitter to
01:05:03.460 ban Berenson.
01:05:04.400 What?
01:05:05.740 What?
01:05:07.780 What?
01:05:08.900 Are you serious?
01:05:12.060 The White House
01:05:13.100 emailed Twitter to
01:05:14.120 ban him?
01:05:14.680 What?
01:05:15.800 Are you fucking
01:05:16.720 kidding me?
01:05:19.540 You're serious.
01:05:22.040 Oh, my God.
01:05:23.900 Oh, my God.
01:05:24.960 Now, which White
01:05:28.320 House?
01:05:30.920 Which White House
01:05:32.100 did that?
01:05:34.080 Was that
01:05:34.660 Biden?
01:05:36.160 That was
01:05:36.720 Biden, huh?
01:05:41.680 Wow.
01:05:43.600 I'm blown away.
01:05:44.820 Okay, I'm going to
01:05:45.280 have to follow up on
01:05:46.060 this because I'm
01:05:47.120 reacting to a first
01:05:48.520 impression.
01:05:49.020 I don't know what the
01:05:49.540 actual story is.
01:05:50.340 But, so let me give
01:05:51.860 you my baseline.
01:05:52.960 I don't think that
01:05:53.740 Alex Berenson
01:05:54.500 was right
01:05:56.840 about a lot of
01:05:59.400 what he said.
01:06:00.860 I don't believe he
01:06:01.780 was right.
01:06:03.700 I do believe
01:06:04.760 he was useful.
01:06:07.640 Meaning that
01:06:08.420 I kind of
01:06:09.060 appreciate there's
01:06:09.860 somebody out there
01:06:10.600 making a strong
01:06:12.360 case for an
01:06:14.060 alternative that
01:06:14.940 you don't want to
01:06:15.660 forget about.
01:06:16.420 You know, the
01:06:18.000 strong case is that
01:06:18.880 the experts were
01:06:19.600 wrong or lying.
01:06:21.460 And we live in a
01:06:22.340 world where if you
01:06:23.080 don't think about
01:06:23.700 that every moment
01:06:24.820 you're going to
01:06:26.440 get in trouble.
01:06:27.660 So you need
01:06:28.300 somebody like a
01:06:29.180 Berenson all the
01:06:30.020 time.
01:06:31.360 If you didn't have
01:06:32.700 a Berenson you'd
01:06:33.440 have to invent one
01:06:34.320 because you need
01:06:34.840 one.
01:06:35.460 You need somebody
01:06:36.240 telling you every
01:06:37.000 minute this could
01:06:37.760 be a lie.
01:06:38.740 I think they're
01:06:39.200 just lying.
01:06:39.840 It's just bullshit.
01:06:40.660 Don't believe the
01:06:41.180 data.
01:06:41.560 The data's wrong.
01:06:42.780 Because that little
01:06:43.480 voice in your head
01:06:44.640 is really useful.
01:06:46.420 That said, I don't
01:06:47.940 think he got the
01:06:48.560 right answers in a
01:06:50.400 number of situations.
01:06:52.460 But the fact that
01:06:55.820 if this is true that
01:06:57.040 the White House was
01:06:58.640 involved in banning
01:06:59.580 him, I'm on his
01:07:02.680 side completely.
01:07:05.560 If that's true, so
01:07:06.720 I'm going to wait to
01:07:07.240 find out if it's
01:07:07.660 true.
01:07:08.100 But if it's true that
01:07:09.100 the government was
01:07:09.920 trying to shut him
01:07:10.680 down, I don't care
01:07:12.060 that I thought most
01:07:12.860 of what he said was
01:07:13.480 wrong, then I'm
01:07:15.120 completely on his
01:07:15.920 side at that
01:07:16.380 point.
01:07:19.840 Yeah.
01:07:23.220 All right.
01:07:26.960 Let's talk about
01:07:28.120 something else.
01:07:29.300 And I'm going to
01:07:30.560 talk to the locals
01:07:31.580 people in a minute.
01:07:32.500 But YouTube, thanks
01:07:33.240 for joining.
01:07:34.360 Biggest crowd ever.
01:07:36.120 I hope I didn't
01:07:36.660 disappoint.
01:07:37.360 Probably was the
01:07:38.080 best live stream
01:07:38.780 you've ever seen.
01:07:40.480 Probably.
01:07:41.620 Bye for now.
01:07:42.200 Bye for now.
01:07:42.660 Bye.
01:07:42.880 Bye for now.
01:07:49.600 Bye for now.
01:07:55.480 Bye for now.
01:08:01.060 Bye.
01:08:01.600 Bye.
01:08:01.680 Bye.