Episode 1838 Scott Adams： Trump Flushes Lizard Cheney Down The Dynasty Toilet, HOAX List Is Up To 14
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
149.16559
Summary
The She Hulk is a woman. Arizona opens a charter school program for public school students, and the new She Hulk movie is out and it's good. Also, a new movie is being made about the first time a woman has ever been the Hulk.
Transcript
00:00:01.000
Good morning, everybody. Welcome to another greatest moment of your life. It's just one
00:00:08.080
after another now. And today will be special. It'll be incredible. Lots of stuff happening.
00:00:14.440
It's all fun. And if you'd like to enjoy this experience at the maximum rate, well, all
00:00:22.800
you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a canteen jar, a flask, a vessel
00:00:29.160
of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled
00:00:36.960
pleasure. It's the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's
00:00:43.300
called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go. Somebody emailed me the other day that
00:00:57.080
they have a coworker whose actual natural name is Brandon Fell. It's probably not the only
00:01:06.120
one. It sounds like it might be a common name. Brandon Fell. Well, that's his name. All right.
00:01:12.080
I didn't put this in my notes, so I'm going to say this first. I just saw a tweet by Corey
00:01:17.700
DeAngelis saying that Arizona, and I think they're their first state, now has opened up
00:01:24.700
their program that money can follow students so they can do homeschooling and charter schools
00:01:30.520
and whatever. And it's live. Apparently the program is live now. So parents can take the
00:01:38.660
funding that would have gone to the public school and take it with them to a private school.
00:01:42.080
That's amazing. Now, this is the best of America, in my opinion. This is a system that's working
00:01:50.560
exactly the way it should be. The states are the laboratory. Arizona wanted to go first.
00:01:57.460
And I don't know, maybe in a year or two years, we'll have a pretty good idea how it worked out.
00:02:03.440
Maybe two years is short. I don't know. But we'll have some indications.
00:02:06.460
Now, is this the best idea in the world or the worst idea? We don't know. That's the beauty of it.
00:02:14.140
I think it's a good idea. Seems like it would be. Competition and all that. But, you know,
00:02:19.820
unintended consequences, so we'll see. But that is a really, really big moment in the, let's say,
00:02:30.360
the integrity of the republic. Because as you know, our school systems are our biggest weakness right
00:02:37.300
now. If we're miseducating the youth, we're not going to have a good outcome. And fixing that's the
00:02:43.480
biggest, I think, the biggest challenge we have. And not that it's hard to do. It's just the most
00:02:50.060
important thing to do. Because if you get everybody on the same page and they're educated and they're
00:02:54.280
doing a good job, well, everything else seems to work out a little bit better. So that's all good
00:02:59.620
news. More good news. Oh, my God, it's just all good news today. The Marvel has now started to stream
00:03:08.580
the She-Hulk. So this is your Marvel Hulk movie in which the new Hulk is a woman. You still have the
00:03:16.200
build Hulk. You know, the obsolete, patriarchal male Hulk. But we have a new, improved, woke Hulk
00:03:24.720
called She-Hulk. And I think this is starting off a good, sort of a good pattern. I'd like to see
00:03:32.740
more of this. Because here they've got the pronoun for the Hulk, like, right in the title of the movie,
00:03:38.480
so you can't get it wrong. Don't you think they should do that with all movies going forward?
00:03:44.120
Like, Captain America? You know, it could be, like, He-Captain?
00:03:52.880
Yeah, I feel like we should just, you know, what about, what are some other movies?
00:04:00.280
Like that, yeah, we should just put the pronoun in front of all of them. He-Iron Man? Or maybe
00:04:05.880
they? Yeah, so instead of Iron Man, it would be Iron They? Or could it be Iron Woman?
00:04:14.120
But my problem with this whole thing is, is that it's not really woke enough. Is, this
00:04:22.300
is 2022. Am I, am I wrong? Did I get the, did I get the year wrong? It's 2022. Now, I realize
00:04:30.720
it takes years to actually get a movie made. But I feel like this is already somewhat out
00:04:36.700
of step with the times. It's not nearly woke enough, is it? So I'm going to skip She-Hulk.
00:04:43.620
I'm not going to, this will be actually the first Marvel movie that I'm not watching. Because
00:04:47.900
just out of principle, I'm going to wait for LGBTQ plus Hulk. I want to, I want a Hulk that's
00:04:54.180
either disabled or has something, a little extra flavor. Like just being a woman, a little bit
00:05:03.400
boring in 2022. If somebody said, oh, I invited somebody to the party. You say, who'd you invite?
00:05:10.120
A woman. You'd be like, oh, that's a little boring. But also she's bringing a man. You're
00:05:17.400
like, God, that's boring. A man and a woman. Give me a little LGBTQ action, a little flavor,
00:05:25.320
please. I like a little spice in my movies. And She-Hulk is just not getting it done in 2022.
00:05:31.220
You got to ramp it up, ramp it up a little bit. Well, I have a category of humor that I love,
00:05:38.220
which I'm going to share with you. It's called the shortest dismissive insult. For some reason,
00:05:46.440
I love it when somebody can get the crispest, you know, the most cutting insult in the smallest
00:05:52.480
number of words. I'll give you an example. For example, if you were to say that Brian Stelter
00:06:00.720
of CNN is the poor man's Jeffrey Toobin. That's good, right? Yeah. Brian Stelter is the poor man's
00:06:09.460
Jeffrey Toobin. Come on. You love that. I know you do. I know you love that. Right? It's a good
00:06:15.200
category of humor. But here's one from somebody on Twitter named Het Puniza Paradij, which I think I
00:06:24.560
nailed it. I think I nailed that last name. But he tweets about the She-Hulk movie. And I just love
00:06:32.200
this. So this is one, two, three, four, five words. Are you ready for five words that sum up the
00:06:40.340
She-Hulk movie without ever having watched it? This is what Het gives us. This is Green Karen.
00:06:47.940
Try to forget you ever heard that. Good luck. You'll never be able to see She-Hulk again without
00:07:01.700
thinking Green Karen. Is that the funniest thing you've seen in a while? Green Karen. Oh, God.
00:07:12.860
We'll get to Liz Cheney and all the fun stuff. So yesterday I fell for a hoax, which is not the
00:07:22.300
first time. Because you see stuff, when you see stuff on Twitter that looks like what you think
00:07:30.200
you expect, it's real easy to fall for it. So I fell for one yesterday for, I don't know, about a
00:07:36.020
minute or two before somebody said, hey, that's a hoax. So I took it down and confessed that I'd
00:07:41.500
fallen for a hoax. So it was somebody had published the so-called Rules for Radicals.
00:07:47.840
How many of you heard of the Rules for Radicals? So this is from the 60s or something. And
00:07:54.500
allegedly these Rules for Radicals tell the left, yeah, it's Alinsky's work, tell the left how to
00:08:02.800
manipulate and, I guess, gaslight the public until they can get what they want. So the eight rules
00:08:10.720
that I saw that I retweeted were fake ones. And the fake ones had stuff like, you know,
00:08:18.420
run up the debt and bankrupt the country. And I thought to myself, now let me make a confession
00:08:25.280
here. This would be my second confession of error in five minutes. I got a lot of them
00:08:31.080
today. So my second confession is that although people talk continuously about the rules for
00:08:41.340
radicals, I believed without doing research, so here's my confession part, and you can judge
00:08:48.140
me, you can judge me unfairly for this, if you like, or even fairly, I never bothered to
00:08:55.460
look into them. So it's one of these things you hear all the time. Oh, these Rules for Radicals,
00:09:01.320
they're using those rules again. And for whatever reason, I was so sure that those rules were complete
00:09:08.920
bullshit that I never bothered to look at them. I just dismissed them as, you know, more just
00:09:15.080
political talk. But I finally had to look at them because I had accidentally tweeted the fake
00:09:20.480
ones, because I thought the fake ones were proving my point. The fake ones looked like
00:09:25.180
bullshit. And sure enough, they were. They were actually hoax. They were fake ones. So
00:09:30.220
I looked at the real ones. What do you think? Are the real ones, are the real ones like really
00:09:36.580
powerful work? Or are they just bullshit? What do you think? Are the real Rules for Radicals
00:09:44.260
most powerful plans for taking over countries? Or just a bunch of bullshit? Well, I looked
00:09:50.960
at them, and as far as I can tell, it's just generic stuff. Let me run through them quickly.
00:09:57.280
I'll do this just quickly. But this is the most generic stuff I've ever seen. There's nothing
00:10:01.760
here. To me, it's completely empty. But it could be that these were, maybe these were groundbreaking
00:10:09.160
ideas when they came out in the 60s. Is that possible? But in 2022, there's nothing on here
00:10:14.960
that's even interesting. These are just completely normal things. Let me give you the idea. Number
00:10:20.440
one, power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. That's called bluffing.
00:10:28.380
Did you need the Rules for Radicals to know that pretending to have more power than you do
00:10:33.160
is a good thing? Well, what did that add? Literally every human knows that bluffing can
00:10:40.100
be a good thing. Number two, never go outside the expertise of your people. Well, isn't that
00:10:47.060
a little bit commonsensical? You should stay with what you know instead of talking about
00:10:51.760
things you don't know, because that would embarrass you. Or it's not going to be as effective.
00:10:56.840
Isn't that the most basic thing you would ever do in any domain, is to stay within your expertise
00:11:02.320
of your people, not necessarily your own. But then three is, whenever possible, go outside
00:11:08.380
the expertise of the enemy. In other words, if you have some knowledge or expertise they
00:11:14.420
don't have, use it against them. Did you need to be told that? Who wouldn't do that automatically?
00:11:20.940
If you have some expertise and your opponent does not, wouldn't you take advantage of that?
00:11:26.560
Did you need to read rules to find out to do that? These are the most ordinary, basic
00:11:32.100
things anybody would do. How about make the enemy live up to its own book of rules? Well,
00:11:37.480
what's the most common thing that politicians do? They accuse the other of being a hypocrite,
00:11:42.360
making the other one live up to their own rules. The claim of hypocrisy is the most empty,
00:11:49.800
useless thing that anybody ever used. There's no power in any of this stuff. This stuff is all
00:11:54.700
inert. So far. Then it says, ridicule is man's most potent weapon. You know, so you should use
00:12:00.780
ridicule and mock your opponents. That's what everybody does. That's what everybody does and
00:12:07.140
always has. Both sides mock their opponents. What insight did we get by having this on the list?
00:12:15.340
How about a good tactic is one your people enjoy? Did you need to be told that? That people will do
00:12:22.060
things they like to do more than things they don't like to do. Was that like an innovation in the
00:12:29.100
60s? How about seven? A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Well, everybody knows you need
00:12:36.400
to keep your energy high. Duh. Keep the pressure on. Duh. That's everybody on every topic all the time.
00:12:46.860
The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. Yes, fear works as persuasion.
00:12:54.120
Did you need to know that scaring people works? Who in the world needed to tell you that?
00:13:00.620
How about the major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a
00:13:06.700
constant pressure upon the opposition. So you should have an organization that keeps the pressure on.
00:13:11.740
Again, did you need to know that if you're organizing, you need an organization?
00:13:25.140
If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through
00:13:29.920
into its counterside, which is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.
00:13:36.220
All right. So first of all, it's just a bunch of word salad, obvious stuff about if you push a
00:13:42.740
negative hard enough, it'll make a difference. Well, everybody knows that. If you, if you accuse
00:13:48.820
your opponent of something long enough and hard enough, this starts, starts working. That's both
00:13:55.540
sides all the time. Number 12, wait, is there two 12s? No. Number 12, the price of a successful
00:14:01.780
attack is a constructive alternative. All right. Well, that doesn't even mean anything.
00:14:08.000
The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Literally means nothing.
00:14:14.740
Number 13, pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. So here he's saying, you know,
00:14:21.560
if you have a, if you have a political policy topic, you should put a person on it so you can attack the
00:14:29.320
person, which is what everybody does. Every one of these rules for radicals is what every politician
00:14:36.220
does in every situation. There isn't a single thing here that's even the least bit interesting.
00:14:42.460
Am I wrong? Did you hear anything on this list that you said, oh, now we're in trouble?
00:14:49.840
They've seen these rules. This is completely nonsense. It's completely useless twaddle.
00:14:57.340
And I can't believe anybody would need to read these to know to do these things.
00:15:03.380
Demonize your opponent? Oh, it's very good that somebody told me to do that. I never would have
00:15:09.100
thought of that. This is literally NPC programming. Because every NPC, in other words, somebody who
00:15:18.340
didn't even have a complete brain, would know to do this stuff. All right. So I'm going to stick
00:15:24.460
with my, it was bullshit. I'm seeing people compare Kamala Harris to the boss from Dilbert.
00:15:32.740
I told you eventually every story comes back to me, even if I don't want it to. I want to see if I
00:15:37.940
can find her latest word salad. It's a beauty if you haven't heard it. Pretty sure I can find it.
00:15:47.300
We know that we really are quite behind in terms of maximizing our collective understanding about how
00:15:56.020
we will engage on the technology of today. And what we can quickly and easily predict will be
00:16:02.740
the technology over the next decades. So to maintain our position as the United States of America on this
00:16:09.480
issue, it is critical that we work together to understand where we are, to recognize and have
00:16:16.920
the courage to speak truth about what is obsolete, and then to partner to ensure that we are speaking
00:16:23.920
the same language with the same motivation, inspired by the opportunity of it all, but then doing the work
00:16:32.880
of updating how we've been talking and thinking about our exploration in space. We know that we really
00:16:41.280
are quite... Now, do you think it's fair to compare her to the pointy-haired boss in the Dilbert comic strip?
00:16:51.840
Do you feel that maybe that's not too far off, is it?
00:16:57.480
Wow. You know, it's funny because every time I see one of these clips, I think to myself,
00:17:07.160
well, she's going to tighten up her speaking after that, you know, because she's not going to want
00:17:11.860
to do this word salad again. But didn't you hear that her speechwriter quit? Can you do a fact check?
00:17:18.220
Didn't her, or was it her communications head or a speechwriter? Like whoever was in charge of
00:17:23.800
helping her speak better, quit? And I'm thinking, how could you ever get another job after that?
00:17:30.960
Imagine putting on your resume, Kamala Harris's speechwriter.
00:17:41.440
I mean, seriously. Imagine looking at, you know, you've got a job applicant.
00:17:45.800
Yeah, let's see, your last job was, let me see, you were Kamala Harris's speechwriter.
00:17:50.840
I think we're done here. The door's over there.
00:17:57.980
All right. Germany has decided to postpone closing its last three nuclear plants. Now,
00:18:05.120
this is an update on a story. They had already decided to keep open some other ones, but now
00:18:11.420
I think three more. So Germany is really getting a lot of religion on nuclear power, as they should.
00:18:19.000
And Michael Schellenberger and his team did a lot of persuasion on this one. So they get the win.
00:18:30.360
All right. So Liz Cheney lost her primary to a Trump-endorsed candidate. I guess she won about,
00:18:38.580
she lost about two to one. It wasn't even close.
00:18:40.700
So she had won her prior elections by overwhelming majorities, but she just got slaughtered.
00:18:48.580
Now, how is the news covering it? Well, CNN says that it's more a sign that it's Trump's party
00:18:56.280
and that eight of the ten Republicans who voted to impeach Trump ended up losing or having to retire
00:19:05.040
or something. Okay. So that's CNN's thing. And I'm thinking, is it 100% because Liz Cheney
00:19:15.240
wanted to impeach Trump? Is that the only problem with Liz Cheney, is that she went after Trump?
00:19:25.260
Because to me, it looks like there's some Liz Cheney problems here that have to be addressed.
00:19:30.660
I'm not sure that she did anything but some kind of weird personal vendetta to self-aggrandize.
00:19:43.080
I mean, there's nothing about what she did that even seems laudable at all.
00:19:49.480
She was trying to do the, I'm above it all, and I'm better than you Republicans.
00:19:53.660
It completely failed because she ended up being a puppet for one of the biggest hoaxes.
00:20:00.660
So the January 6th thing, I'm just going to call a hoax, because I think that's fair enough,
00:20:06.820
at least in terms of it being an organized insurrection. That part's a hoax.
00:20:12.200
And so she basically got taken down by the Democrats.
00:20:17.680
The Democrats basically attached her to their giant hoax, and they guaranteed that she was
00:20:22.680
going to lose her job, which was, I suppose, maybe kind of clever of them in some weird way.
00:20:30.240
But to me, Liz Cheney, of course, she will keep on the fight. They always say that.
00:20:35.320
But I feel like she's Captain Ahab and Moby Dick.
00:20:39.420
I feel like she's just chasing her own personal white whale that happens to be an orange whale in this case,
00:20:45.400
great orange whale, and God, I want to say a word I don't want to say, but I'm not going to do it.
00:20:56.140
Let's just say that Liz Cheney may have come across as not a person that you want to support.
00:21:05.000
Well, CNN did this great gaslighting piece as part of their ongoing hypnotizing of the public.
00:21:19.420
So CNN attended a hackers convention in which part of the hacker convention was
00:21:25.740
they had access to a bunch of voting machine hardware and software.
00:21:30.120
And then the hackers were going to look for vulnerabilities in the voting machine software.
00:21:36.500
Now, how do you think CNN would cover a story about hackers looking for vulnerabilities in voting machines?
00:21:47.060
Because it would be counter to their narrative to say that the voting machines have vulnerabilities.
00:21:53.240
But on the other hand, that is the main context of the story
00:21:57.320
because the hackers did, in fact, find vulnerabilities.
00:22:01.500
Now, there wasn't much detail about those vulnerabilities,
00:22:04.340
but even CNN reported, yes, we found vulnerabilities.
00:22:11.960
Hey, hacker guy whose only expertise is hacking,
00:22:19.740
Did you find any evidence that those vulnerabilities were exploited to change the election?
00:22:29.000
No evidence that anything bad happened in the election.
00:22:40.580
How are they going to find evidence that the election had been hacked
00:22:44.220
by looking at unconnected machines sitting on a table?
00:22:49.660
How is he going to look at a clean voting machine with no data on it
00:22:54.500
and determine that the election had been rigged
00:22:57.300
by looking at a machine that may not have ever been part of the voting process?
00:23:04.100
But the way they presented it was that he was talking with some authority
00:23:07.700
that they had told that they could determine through their hacking skills
00:23:14.940
So it wasn't, so they could determine for sure that it was hackable
00:23:19.060
and that seems to be, you know, something nobody's arguing about.
00:23:25.260
But then they went to the point where they fooled you into thinking
00:23:28.440
this guy could tell that nothing had happened in the actual election
00:23:35.280
which in all likelihoods had never been near an election.
00:23:39.080
It probably was an extra one that the voting company gave them.
00:23:47.200
Do you think they got the spare voting machines from, let's say, counties that used them?
00:23:54.640
do you have an extra that we can just use and take apart?
00:23:59.760
Or do you think it's more likely they went to the voting machine companies themselves
00:24:03.300
and said, could you give us a blank that we can play with?
00:24:08.040
And if it came from the voting machine companies themselves,
00:24:12.400
would it necessarily look exactly like the ones that were in the election?
00:24:19.780
Do you think there's one version of voting machine out there?
00:24:23.620
Isn't there all kinds of different software versions?
00:24:30.500
Because I imagine that every voting machine had exactly one version of software on it.
00:24:34.500
Don't you think that there are dozens of software patches and versions all along the way?
00:24:42.120
They probably saw the most recent software, wouldn't you say?
00:24:46.920
I assume that these had software on them, of course.
00:24:50.780
So did the hackers see the software version that was in the election,
00:24:56.380
or did they see the most modern software version,
00:24:59.700
which one assumes might have some patches of it, who knows, updates?
00:25:04.300
There is absolutely nothing about this that tells you whether or not the election was rigged.
00:25:10.840
It just tells you that it was totally possible.
00:25:17.920
What is the most likely way an election would be rigged electronically?
00:25:24.820
Is the most likely way an outside hacker gets into the system?
00:25:36.520
The most likely way, by a factor of, I don't know, 100 to 1?
00:25:45.560
The most likely way it would happen was an insider.
00:25:52.580
Did the hackers put any devices into the skull of all the employees who have access to the data
00:26:00.900
and say, we checked your brain, and we don't see that you did anything?
00:26:06.600
So the biggest risk, we completely ignore, because we don't have a way to check.
00:26:19.580
Meanwhile, the biggest risk is always just some guy or some woman.
00:26:36.900
It's amazing that that happens right in front of us.
00:26:39.580
So I had some vague understanding that that whole Gretchen Whitmer, a governor, might-be-kidnapped plot by the extremists.
00:26:52.220
And I didn't know the whole story, but apparently the story is that it was a complete setup by one FBI agent,
00:27:01.100
But primarily one FBI agent who had some outside security business interests seemed to have been trying to create the impression
00:27:10.160
that the extremist risk was higher than it was, probably for his own income.
00:27:19.120
It was one guy in the FBI who looked like he could make some money by, you know, making it look like there's a threat,
00:27:24.960
and then he could presumably pay to take care of the threat that he had created.
00:27:30.760
So they did everything they could to convince some regular people who did not want to kidnap anybody to get involved in this plot.
00:27:39.160
And now, because it's in a court, we have really good evidence, proof, you could say, because it's gone through the court system,
00:27:48.660
that an FBI agent was behind a whole fake hoax kidnap plot.
00:28:01.880
And part of the story, which is interesting, is that the FBI, one FBI did talk to the local police when the protests happened
00:28:10.500
and asked them to stand aside and let the protesters enter the Capitol building.
00:28:15.640
So at the same time that we're wondering if the January 6th thing had anything sketchy about it,
00:28:25.400
we see an exact model in the real world of what people suspected was happening with January 6th.
00:28:34.260
Now, I'm not going to allege that January 6th was an FBI operation.
00:28:41.040
But when you look at one that was an FBI operation and you look at the parallels,
00:28:51.140
But there is one part that you shouldn't lose sight of,
00:29:03.220
the kidnap plot really seems to be run by one person as opposed to the FBI.
00:29:11.040
So there's no evidence that I've seen that the FBI as an organization was trying to do this.
00:29:19.660
So you'd have to take that to the January 6th protest and say to yourself,
00:29:24.480
could it be that one or more persons is all it took to make it look like an FBI plot?
00:29:32.840
It wouldn't take much if it only takes one or two people to motivate other people to look like a plot.
00:29:40.960
So given that that happened, it's hard for me to imagine that you could completely dismiss the possibility that the FBI was involved.
00:29:50.380
Again, I don't have any information that would suggest they were.
00:30:00.060
But man, it goes right to the top of your possibility list, doesn't it?
00:30:05.320
It goes right to the top of the possibility list.
00:30:09.000
Rasmussen did a poll on asking people if they trusted lawyers.
00:30:19.300
Of the people who had actually hired lawyers and had experience with lawyers,
00:30:23.780
the more experience you had with a lawyer, the less you trusted lawyers.
00:30:28.880
So if you had never hired a lawyer, you were more likely to trust them.
00:30:39.240
But I feel like people trust their own lawyer more than they trust other people's lawyers.
00:30:48.400
But I always think the other lawyers are, I can't trust them.
00:30:51.400
But, of course, it's a system where you're not supposed to trust the other side.
00:30:58.380
Elon Musk made some news by saying that he was basically in the middle.
00:31:03.800
So he was on the right side of the Democrats and the left side of Republicans.
00:31:11.860
And then he also announced he's buying Manchester United,
00:31:23.900
If somebody would like to take over America, let me tell you how to do it.
00:31:35.140
You want to have a situation where the Democrats and the Republicans are so close
00:31:39.880
that a third party would always determine who won.
00:31:51.580
is that they're obviously left or obviously right.
00:31:56.500
So you could always tell who they're taking votes away from.
00:32:00.840
So if you always know who the third party is going to take votes from,
00:32:07.500
then you don't really have power except to be a spoiler.
00:32:10.620
You want to be like Joe Manchin where nobody knows which way you're going to go.
00:32:16.980
So here's what I would call a center party if I were to create one to run the world.
00:32:41.380
And the center is where most people believe they are.
00:32:46.720
And they believe that they'd like you to know it's common.
00:32:55.460
because the far left and the far right get all the attention,
00:33:00.320
hey, we're here, we're common, we're in the middle.
00:33:04.140
So if you called yourself the common center party
00:33:09.580
and you made sure that sometimes you leaned left
00:33:19.960
is cannibalize one side a little bit harder than the other
00:33:24.160
and you could determine who the president would be.
00:33:34.840
okay, the center wants to have stronger immigration.
00:33:40.440
So suddenly, all the people who think Trump is too extreme,
00:33:47.820
they go, oh, the center party, you know, that's for me.
00:33:51.540
And then that center party could make the left win
00:33:53.960
because they'd take away too many of the votes from the right.
00:34:17.260
intentionally to take a little more from the left
00:34:26.960
because you'd get to decide who the president was.
00:34:50.700
My last point, I have to save for the locals' platform
00:35:38.000
Does anybody think that by calling out the hoax pattern,
00:35:45.460
Yeah, there's something powerful about writing it down
00:36:02.200
I just made a picture, and that made it potent.
00:36:48.600
Now, the trouble is it's not being fully exposed
00:37:01.260
I don't really break through to the other side.
00:37:30.400
even the things that the court has shown as hoaxes.
00:39:12.720
it looks like they were just obviously throttled.
00:39:16.680
we're deep into confirmation bias territory, right?