Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 29, 2022


Episode 1850 Scott Adams: More Obvious Lies From The FBI And DOJ. All The Gaslighting Going On Now


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per minute

136.13907

Word count

8,873

Sentence count

598

Harmful content

Misogyny

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

46

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Scott Adams talks about Bill Maher's interview with Rob Reiner and the possibility of rigging the 2020 election, and why he thinks it would be a good idea to try to keep Donald Trump out of office.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, welcome to the best place on earth, the highest point of human civilization.
00:00:07.640 Coffee with Scott Adams, and it doesn't get better than this.
00:00:11.040 No, it does get better than this.
00:00:13.260 And all you have to do is add the simultaneous sip to an already extremely exciting situation.
00:00:21.340 And all you need to do that is a cuppermunker glass of tanker gel,
00:00:25.160 just find a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:31.780 I like coffee.
00:00:33.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:39.060 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:41.900 It's called a simultaneous sip.
00:00:44.900 It happens now. Go.
00:00:46.300 Go.
00:00:51.420 Oh.
00:00:55.160 So Erica is hard at work organizing the design of the Coffee with Scott Adams Simultaneous Sip Coffee Mug. 0.99
00:01:06.900 And once that's done, I guess you'll all have a chance to get one.
00:01:13.120 Now, let me tell you my feeling about merchandise.
00:01:17.620 My feeling about merchandise is it's for the benefit of the people who want it.
00:01:22.360 It's not like a way to make money.
00:01:25.900 But if you want it, I think it's fun to have.
00:01:28.920 So I'm excited to see what the group comes up with over on Locals.
00:01:35.480 All right.
00:01:36.820 To me, the most interesting story that just continues is that Bill Maher interview with Rob Reiner.
00:01:43.340 And I had to watch it again because it's really interesting to watch it live.
00:01:48.580 When you read about it and you just see the quotes, it really doesn't capture the enormity of the moment.
00:01:56.980 And the enormity of the moment is that it captured everything that's wrong with all of the political conversation.
00:02:04.020 Because there was somebody who was a big, you know, Rob Reiner, a prominent Democrat voice,
00:02:10.000 specifically an anti-Trump voice.
00:02:14.560 And there was a major news story, you know, the suppression of the Honda laptop,
00:02:20.320 that he was completely unaware of.
00:02:24.680 I mean, that's a big, big story.
00:02:27.860 To be completely unaware of that means you don't really understand anything that's going on.
00:02:33.420 Because if you don't know that your own government would not only suppress that, but admit it,
00:02:40.340 and the news would say, yeah, we did that, that probably shouldn't have done that, but we did that.
00:02:44.780 They just admit it.
00:02:46.700 And he questioned whether that is a known fact.
00:02:51.580 And Bill Maher had to tell him, it's not only a known fact, they've confessed.
00:02:57.700 They confessed.
00:02:58.780 The people who did it say they did it.
00:03:02.420 And Rob Reiner didn't know.
00:03:06.720 So, I give Bill Maher an A-plus for asking the question.
00:03:12.440 But he still fell just short of the real question.
00:03:19.280 So, the way he asked it, Bill Maher, was, you know, if Trump is so dangerous,
00:03:24.900 is it true that anything would be justified to keep him out of office?
00:03:29.340 Now, the anything would be justified covers, you know, the whole range.
00:03:34.140 Anything.
00:03:35.940 But here's the question you really want to ask, isn't it?
00:03:40.720 If you're a Democrat, and you think Trump is this dangerous,
00:03:45.040 and you had the ability to rig an election to keep him out of office,
00:03:49.320 would you do it?
00:03:51.720 And should you do it?
00:03:52.880 See, that's the question.
00:03:56.920 Because here's the thing that pisses me off.
00:04:00.320 I personally have no information that would suggest the election was rigged in a major way that I can confirm.
00:04:07.800 So, let me say that right off the bat.
00:04:11.460 No court has said that the 2020 election was illegitimate,
00:04:15.560 and I'm not personally aware of any information that would change that assumption.
00:04:20.060 However, however, when people tell me that it's unreasonable to imagine the election would be rigged,
00:04:30.840 I can't, I can't sit still for that.
00:04:34.140 Okay, I'm okay when you say the evidence has not been shown in any conclusive way.
00:04:42.580 Okay.
00:04:43.980 Okay.
00:04:44.580 But when you go further from that and say,
00:04:47.600 oh, that's a ridiculous thing to imagine that an election could be rigged,
00:04:51.460 under these conditions?
00:04:53.680 Under these conditions, it would be ridiculous to imagine it wasn't.
00:04:59.460 Am I wrong?
00:05:01.500 The baseline assumption is that under these conditions,
00:05:06.340 these very unique conditions,
00:05:08.340 that people literally think that Hiller was going to be re-elected,
00:05:11.920 under those conditions,
00:05:14.120 you need to prove you didn't rig the election.
00:05:19.720 Am I wrong?
00:05:21.300 If all of the reasons suggest you should,
00:05:25.660 and you're probably able,
00:05:27.540 I don't know that for sure,
00:05:28.680 but one imagines that if you worked at it,
00:05:31.400 you could find some way to rig an election.
00:05:33.560 You might have to get more people in on it to cover it up.
00:05:36.520 But one imagines it's possible.
00:05:39.160 Right?
00:05:39.300 I haven't heard anybody argue that rigging an election can't be done
00:05:44.200 under any situation.
00:05:46.320 I've only heard somebody say they believe it wasn't done.
00:05:50.800 But nobody said it can't be done under all scenarios.
00:05:55.780 There's just no way to do it.
00:05:56.940 Nobody said that.
00:05:59.000 And so isn't the most reasonable assumption
00:06:01.280 that in this specific situation where the people running the elections
00:06:05.740 believed they could save the world
00:06:08.380 by rigging the election,
00:06:11.440 the assumption has to be that they did.
00:06:15.040 The assumption has to be that they did.
00:06:18.020 Because the opposite assumption is actually nonsensical.
00:06:22.300 It would be like,
00:06:23.840 I know how much you like analogies,
00:06:26.100 because they're so persuasive.
00:06:28.960 I'm not even going to bother.
00:06:30.060 I'm just saying that if you start with the assumption
00:06:32.920 that Trump is what you think he is,
00:06:35.220 it would be ridiculous to imagine
00:06:38.180 that the election was not rigged
00:06:40.580 to prevent him from office.
00:06:42.360 That would be a ridiculous assumption.
00:06:44.900 Now, if somebody couldn't figure out how to do it,
00:06:48.480 or they were afraid of getting caught,
00:06:50.180 well, that would hold them back.
00:06:51.860 But it's ridiculous to imagine
00:06:54.480 that under this specific set of assumptions
00:06:57.280 that Trump is so dangerous,
00:06:59.520 it's ridiculous to assume
00:07:01.420 that they didn't at least look into it.
00:07:03.900 Am I right?
00:07:05.360 Do you think nobody looked into it?
00:07:07.840 Do you think there was no Democrat
00:07:09.240 involved in any election process
00:07:11.980 who didn't say to themselves,
00:07:13.420 you know, hypothetically,
00:07:16.260 I'm not saying I'll do it,
00:07:18.860 but if we're just doing
00:07:22.420 a sort of a mental exercise here,
00:07:26.920 you know, could do it this way, maybe.
00:07:32.160 Well, let's talk about the FBI brand.
00:07:34.840 Talk about timing.
00:07:37.200 Have you noticed that timing
00:07:38.540 is the most important thing all the time?
00:07:42.560 Like, if the energy is just right
00:07:44.640 for the thing that happens,
00:07:47.080 then it takes off.
00:07:48.860 But look at this timing.
00:07:50.620 So you remember the NXIVM
00:07:52.540 alleged sex cult situation?
00:07:55.600 There was a subgroup of NXIVM
00:07:57.900 that was an alleged sex cult.
00:08:00.840 And their leader went to jail,
00:08:02.600 and FBI were involved
00:08:04.380 in putting that case together.
00:08:06.440 And now there's an ex-FBI agent.
00:08:08.760 This is not the newest of news,
00:08:10.960 but it's worth resurfacing.
00:08:14.360 So this ex-FBI agent
00:08:15.900 looked at the evidence
00:08:16.860 that convicted the head of this group,
00:08:20.420 Keith Raniere,
00:08:22.540 and decided that one of the photographs
00:08:25.620 on the laptop,
00:08:28.180 Raniere's laptop,
00:08:29.740 that it was the date had been altered.
00:08:32.820 And that the date had been altered
00:08:35.340 to make it seem as if the picture
00:08:37.240 had been taken
00:08:37.940 at a time that would prove
00:08:40.180 that Keith Raniere
00:08:41.640 was having sex 0.81
00:08:43.940 with an underage girl.
00:08:46.140 17, I think.
00:08:47.380 15, whatever it was.
00:08:50.580 Now,
00:08:52.160 separate from the question
00:08:53.500 of whether any of those things happened
00:08:55.420 is the question
00:08:56.720 of whether any evidence
00:08:57.800 was rigged
00:08:58.600 or faked.
00:09:01.440 So there's an ex-FBI agent
00:09:03.460 who looked at it and said,
00:09:04.520 oh yeah,
00:09:04.800 this is definitely faked.
00:09:06.240 Because he just looks at the file.
00:09:08.420 Looks at the file name,
00:09:09.680 and apparently there's some way
00:09:10.600 to know when it got changed
00:09:11.860 or the date got changed.
00:09:13.920 Now,
00:09:14.640 here's the question.
00:09:17.100 It's an ex-FBI agent
00:09:18.920 who's accusing
00:09:19.820 current FBI agents,
00:09:21.940 I believe,
00:09:22.500 or at least law enforcement.
00:09:25.900 So there's only
00:09:26.720 one of two possibilities.
00:09:28.820 Either law enforcement lied
00:09:30.480 or an ex-FBI agent
00:09:33.020 is incompetent or lied. 0.86
00:09:35.520 Neither of those things
00:09:36.680 is good for law enforcement.
00:09:39.600 Because either the current bunch
00:09:42.260 are lying or incompetent, 0.90
00:09:44.420 or this ex-FBI agent
00:09:46.740 who wasn't ex that long ago
00:09:48.400 is also incompetent or lying. 0.83
00:09:50.880 But whichever way
00:09:52.820 you look at it,
00:09:53.880 there's somebody involved
00:09:54.900 with law enforcement
00:09:55.780 who definitely
00:09:57.080 is incompetent or lying. 0.88
00:10:00.000 That's the one thing
00:10:00.960 you can say
00:10:01.340 about the NXIVM case.
00:10:02.680 No matter what
00:10:03.540 Keith Raniere did
00:10:04.480 or didn't do,
00:10:06.080 the one thing
00:10:06.640 we can know for sure
00:10:07.660 is that people
00:10:09.120 recently associated
00:10:10.340 with the FBI
00:10:11.040 and law enforcement
00:10:11.860 are definitely
00:10:13.000 incompetent or lying.
00:10:14.260 We just don't know
00:10:14.960 which ones.
00:10:16.340 We don't know
00:10:16.780 which ones.
00:10:17.440 That's it.
00:10:17.920 But we don't have
00:10:19.420 to wonder
00:10:20.000 about the quality
00:10:21.460 of the people
00:10:22.980 in the organization.
00:10:24.280 That part's been answered.
00:10:29.220 Let me do something
00:10:30.840 that maybe is a little
00:10:32.460 counter to what's
00:10:33.900 been going on.
00:10:35.380 I keep hearing people say,
00:10:36.920 oh, we're only talking
00:10:37.880 about the leadership
00:10:38.720 of the FBI
00:10:39.580 and the Department of Justice.
00:10:41.280 We're not trying
00:10:42.060 to impugn the integrity
00:10:43.280 of the rank-and-file people
00:10:44.800 who are just patriots
00:10:46.320 and doing their job
00:10:47.240 as best they can.
00:10:50.260 I'm not going
00:10:50.980 to get on that train.
00:10:52.880 Nope.
00:10:53.740 Nope.
00:10:54.320 If you work
00:10:55.000 for an organization
00:10:55.920 where the top
00:10:57.260 of the organization
00:10:57.920 is corrupt,
00:10:59.900 you've got something
00:11:00.860 to do about that.
00:11:02.480 Leave the organization
00:11:03.560 or be a whistleblower
00:11:04.980 or work on fixing it,
00:11:06.600 but you don't get a pass.
00:11:08.620 You don't get a pass.
00:11:10.220 I'm certainly willing
00:11:11.260 to say that the rank-and-file
00:11:12.520 committed no crimes.
00:11:14.800 Are we all okay with that?
00:11:17.180 Most of the rank-and-file
00:11:18.660 committed no crimes,
00:11:20.420 but you're not off the hook.
00:11:23.300 You're not off the hook.
00:11:24.700 If I belong
00:11:25.540 to an organization
00:11:26.260 that's doing horrible things
00:11:27.700 and I continue
00:11:28.620 to be part
00:11:29.960 of the organization,
00:11:31.120 I'm not innocent.
00:11:32.900 I'm not innocent.
00:11:34.440 If I willingly
00:11:35.580 am supporting that group
00:11:37.400 that's doing terrible things,
00:11:39.380 I think the rank-and-file
00:11:41.140 need to do something
00:11:43.040 on their own.
00:11:43.640 Maybe police their own,
00:11:45.740 do whatever it takes.
00:11:47.460 But I think they're
00:11:48.760 in an unfortunate situation.
00:11:50.640 Through no fault
00:11:51.540 of their own,
00:11:52.580 their brand
00:11:53.200 is being tarnished.
00:11:54.780 But it's still
00:11:56.300 their responsibility.
00:11:58.420 Even though they're
00:12:00.200 under the lower-ranked people,
00:12:03.340 it's still their responsibility.
00:12:04.580 So Biden has referred to
00:12:10.960 the ultra-mega people
00:12:12.880 as semi-fascist.
00:12:14.960 And so I looked up
00:12:16.320 the definition of fascist
00:12:18.140 to figure out
00:12:18.780 what semi-fascist would be.
00:12:21.900 And fascist would be
00:12:23.380 the government controls industry.
00:12:27.060 Basically, right?
00:12:28.400 That's when the government
00:12:29.380 is in control
00:12:30.040 of the private businesses,
00:12:31.140 so they're not exactly private
00:12:32.820 because the government
00:12:33.980 controls them.
00:12:35.520 And that the government
00:12:36.580 suppresses freedoms,
00:12:38.320 et cetera.
00:12:39.680 So what would be
00:12:40.420 semi-fascist?
00:12:42.840 Well, full fascist
00:12:44.180 is completely
00:12:44.980 controlling industry.
00:12:47.220 Semi-fascist would be
00:12:48.740 partially controlling industry.
00:12:51.700 Right?
00:12:52.800 That's just what
00:12:53.440 semi means.
00:12:55.260 You know,
00:12:55.520 you're not completely
00:12:56.640 controlling industry.
00:12:57.600 You're semi-controlling them.
00:13:00.500 What political group
00:13:02.080 would be most associated
00:13:04.240 with semi-trying
00:13:05.640 to control industry?
00:13:09.260 Would it be the ones
00:13:10.460 who want to remove regulations
00:13:12.220 or the people
00:13:13.760 who want to put on regulations? 0.88
00:13:15.940 Well, I would say
00:13:16.460 the people putting on regulations
00:13:18.140 are trying to control them.
00:13:20.620 Democrats.
00:13:21.760 Would it be the people
00:13:22.580 who are increasing the taxes
00:13:24.180 on these businesses
00:13:25.220 or the ones who are
00:13:26.440 decreasing the taxes?
00:13:28.740 Well, I'd say
00:13:29.240 the ones controlling them
00:13:30.740 are the ones
00:13:31.600 increasing the taxes.
00:13:34.260 The ones not controlling them
00:13:35.860 are the ones saying,
00:13:36.700 you don't need to give us
00:13:37.400 any taxes.
00:13:38.540 Do what you want.
00:13:45.120 How about
00:13:46.560 if you were trying
00:13:47.400 to make industry
00:13:48.700 comply with ESG?
00:13:51.460 The idea that industry
00:13:53.560 should pollute less
00:13:55.260 and be better
00:13:57.500 for the environment
00:13:58.160 and have more
00:13:59.140 diverse
00:13:59.920 governorship.
00:14:05.080 They should be governed
00:14:06.280 by more diverse boards,
00:14:07.700 et cetera.
00:14:08.860 Where does that come from?
00:14:10.220 Is that coming from
00:14:11.080 Republicans?
00:14:12.440 Or is it coming from
00:14:14.100 left-leaning people?
00:14:16.300 It's left-leaning people.
00:14:17.360 So if you were to look
00:14:20.100 at fascist means
00:14:21.200 completely controlling
00:14:22.460 the industry,
00:14:24.700 semi-fascist would be
00:14:26.360 partly controlling
00:14:27.940 the industry,
00:14:28.740 there's no question
00:14:29.780 that's the Democrats.
00:14:32.280 Is it?
00:14:34.420 I mean, to me,
00:14:35.440 it looks exactly like
00:14:36.520 they're trying to
00:14:37.020 control industry.
00:14:40.020 But that's not all.
00:14:42.100 So being a fascist
00:14:43.040 would also be trying
00:14:43.980 to control free speech.
00:14:48.360 Which group is more
00:14:50.780 associated with
00:14:51.720 not eliminating
00:14:53.100 free speech
00:14:53.860 but really reducing it?
00:14:56.080 You know,
00:14:56.260 semi-fascist.
00:14:57.620 Full fascist
00:14:58.900 would be no free speech.
00:15:01.260 Semi-fascist would be,
00:15:02.940 well,
00:15:03.820 you're not going to
00:15:04.820 go to jail necessarily,
00:15:07.060 but we might take away
00:15:08.380 your social media access
00:15:09.820 so you can't be heard.
00:15:11.940 Semi-fascist.
00:15:15.340 Am I wrong?
00:15:17.360 That half-fascist
00:15:20.040 describes the Democrats
00:15:22.260 fairly accurately?
00:15:24.820 Right?
00:15:25.960 Now,
00:15:26.620 and I'm not trying
00:15:27.340 to make a Republican
00:15:28.460 versus Democrat,
00:15:29.780 you know,
00:15:30.160 partisan point.
00:15:32.140 I'm just saying,
00:15:33.500 what do words mean?
00:15:36.200 It's just what words mean,
00:15:37.380 right?
00:15:37.580 And it's amazing
00:15:40.700 that fascist
00:15:41.420 has turned into
00:15:42.220 like such a non-word
00:15:43.580 that you can use it
00:15:44.360 in any context.
00:15:45.940 It's like the insult
00:15:46.860 that you can use
00:15:47.380 at any time.
00:15:49.360 What do you mean
00:15:50.340 you're out of coffee?
00:15:52.900 You fascist?
00:15:54.300 I mean,
00:15:54.460 you just throw it
00:15:54.960 in anywhere.
00:15:57.300 All right.
00:15:57.560 Mike Cernovich
00:16:02.300 continues to be
00:16:04.180 provocative.
00:16:07.020 I don't know
00:16:07.920 if he knows
00:16:08.420 how to not be provocative,
00:16:10.140 but he tweeted
00:16:11.680 that he wouldn't
00:16:12.920 be interested
00:16:13.460 in mountain climbing
00:16:15.780 because it would be
00:16:16.940 too easy
00:16:17.480 for the deep state
00:16:18.280 to make him disappear.
00:16:19.240 And people said,
00:16:22.220 what?
00:16:23.280 What?
00:16:24.940 He actually thinks
00:16:26.020 the deep state
00:16:26.820 might try to murder him
00:16:28.840 if he,
00:16:30.820 you know,
00:16:31.140 had some kind
00:16:32.200 of a hobby
00:16:32.640 that would make it
00:16:33.560 easy to murder him.
00:16:35.560 Now,
00:16:36.460 he went further
00:16:40.920 on another tweet
00:16:41.780 because people
00:16:42.780 questioned that,
00:16:43.460 of course.
00:16:44.060 And he said,
00:16:45.140 quote,
00:16:45.500 to kill me
00:16:46.320 or frame me
00:16:47.080 for a crime,
00:16:48.460 the deep state
00:16:49.120 only has to be
00:16:50.040 lucky once.
00:16:51.520 I have to be
00:16:52.200 lucky every day.
00:16:54.040 The pressure
00:16:54.600 would break
00:16:55.520 most people.
00:16:56.520 I don't wish it
00:16:57.240 on anyone.
00:16:58.400 For me,
00:16:59.080 it's good.
00:17:00.420 Keeps me away
00:17:01.200 from sinful behavior
00:17:02.200 and requires vigilance.
00:17:04.040 How we should
00:17:04.720 all live.
00:17:08.160 Now,
00:17:08.840 what do you think?
00:17:10.320 Is that hyperbole?
00:17:11.560 Do you think
00:17:13.360 that Mike Cernovich
00:17:14.440 specifically,
00:17:16.800 not talking generally,
00:17:18.100 just specifically?
00:17:20.380 Do you think
00:17:20.780 that Mike Cernovich
00:17:21.460 has a risk
00:17:22.340 of being murdered
00:17:23.800 or taken out,
00:17:25.220 let's say,
00:17:25.820 by scandal
00:17:26.520 or some kind
00:17:27.380 of allegation
00:17:28.080 or legal process?
00:17:30.140 Do you think
00:17:30.560 the deep state
00:17:31.160 is trying to take
00:17:31.860 Mike Cernovich out?
00:17:35.500 There was a time
00:17:36.520 that I would have
00:17:37.340 scoffed at this.
00:17:39.800 There was a time
00:17:40.840 I would have said,
00:17:41.620 nobody's trying
00:17:42.620 to take you out.
00:17:43.860 But now I would say
00:17:45.620 this is a reasonable
00:17:46.540 take.
00:17:50.140 I think that
00:17:51.360 it seems obvious
00:17:53.980 that influential voices
00:17:56.640 who are more associated
00:17:59.260 with the right,
00:17:59.980 I'm not sure
00:18:00.420 if he would even
00:18:01.100 identify that way,
00:18:03.760 but people that,
00:18:04.620 other people
00:18:05.100 associated with the right
00:18:06.400 are all being targeted,
00:18:08.820 are they not?
00:18:09.320 So he's definitely
00:18:11.260 being targeted.
00:18:12.800 You don't think
00:18:13.480 that if the left
00:18:15.360 had a way
00:18:15.840 to put Cernovich
00:18:16.820 in jail,
00:18:17.920 you don't think
00:18:18.480 that they'd chase that?
00:18:20.820 Of course they would.
00:18:22.200 Because every time
00:18:22.860 you take a voice
00:18:23.580 off the,
00:18:24.760 you know,
00:18:25.020 you take a piece
00:18:25.620 off the chessboard,
00:18:27.040 you get a little advantage.
00:18:28.580 And it looks like
00:18:29.400 they'd do just about anything
00:18:30.500 for advantage.
00:18:35.960 All right,
00:18:36.540 so what about me?
00:18:37.580 Do you think
00:18:39.380 I have been
00:18:40.640 or will be a target
00:18:41.600 to be taken out
00:18:43.460 by the media
00:18:44.140 or deep state?
00:18:50.960 Here's the difference
00:18:52.040 between Cernovich
00:18:54.320 and me
00:18:55.160 on this topic.
00:18:56.920 I also believe
00:18:58.500 that
00:18:59.200 I'm on the target list.
00:19:02.500 So there's no doubt
00:19:04.160 that people
00:19:04.840 who are prominent
00:19:05.860 in the Democratic Party
00:19:07.100 have wondered
00:19:08.220 how to take me out.
00:19:09.740 Would you say
00:19:10.220 that's fair?
00:19:11.920 There are probably
00:19:12.680 people who have,
00:19:13.580 you know,
00:19:13.860 worked on the question
00:19:15.040 of how to take me out.
00:19:17.220 I think that's fair.
00:19:18.660 You're definitely
00:19:19.340 going to see
00:19:19.780 some kind of
00:19:20.360 major hit piece
00:19:21.340 in a big publication
00:19:22.720 between now
00:19:23.900 and December
00:19:24.440 or between now
00:19:25.880 and elections.
00:19:27.240 Probably before
00:19:28.020 the presidential elections
00:19:29.100 because I don't have
00:19:29.780 that much influence
00:19:30.460 on the congressional stuff.
00:19:31.800 now here's the thing.
00:19:39.700 I'm not worried
00:19:40.760 about them
00:19:41.220 taking me out.
00:19:43.240 Do you know
00:19:43.820 why I'm not worried?
00:19:47.000 Do you know
00:19:47.600 why I'm not worried
00:19:48.280 about the deep states
00:19:49.100 taking me out?
00:19:51.920 Because it's already
00:19:52.780 factored in.
00:19:54.180 I think it's going
00:19:55.180 to happen.
00:19:55.600 I don't know how.
00:19:57.780 I mean,
00:19:58.060 I would guess
00:19:58.880 against murder.
00:20:00.840 I doubt I'll be killed.
00:20:03.020 But maybe.
00:20:03.840 Who knows?
00:20:06.080 But I think
00:20:07.700 my fate
00:20:08.300 is to go down hard.
00:20:10.960 I suspect
00:20:11.880 that, you know,
00:20:14.020 my story
00:20:14.980 ends in flames.
00:20:17.620 I've always assumed
00:20:18.700 I would probably
00:20:19.180 be assassinated.
00:20:21.440 But
00:20:21.640 that's factored in.
00:20:25.860 So my actions
00:20:27.120 are not going
00:20:27.620 to be changed
00:20:28.140 by that
00:20:28.500 because I don't
00:20:28.840 think I can change it.
00:20:30.420 I think I end poorly
00:20:31.860 one way or the other.
00:20:34.060 I just don't know when.
00:20:36.080 But
00:20:36.260 it does feel like,
00:20:38.680 you know,
00:20:39.560 it does feel like
00:20:40.340 I'm not going to go to
00:20:41.320 I'm not going to
00:20:44.180 make it all the way.
00:20:45.660 So I do think
00:20:46.720 that it's a dangerous
00:20:47.720 kind of thing
00:20:48.300 that Cernovich does.
00:20:50.600 And a dangerous
00:20:51.420 thing that I do.
00:20:53.020 But
00:20:53.420 he's got kids
00:20:54.440 and, you know,
00:20:55.340 he needs to stay alive.
00:20:57.420 And
00:20:57.800 I'm a little more
00:20:58.820 I think I'm a little
00:21:01.180 more willing to go.
00:21:03.100 I wouldn't mind
00:21:03.820 going for a good reason.
00:21:06.720 I suppose
00:21:07.520 if I got murdered
00:21:08.240 but it made my
00:21:09.260 messages
00:21:09.840 take on
00:21:12.400 a bigger life,
00:21:13.500 that might be good.
00:21:14.880 Never know.
00:21:16.160 Anyway,
00:21:16.560 I don't want to go
00:21:17.060 fully dark,
00:21:17.860 but we do live
00:21:18.740 in a world
00:21:19.140 where
00:21:19.480 a prominent voice
00:21:21.000 worried about
00:21:21.600 getting taken out,
00:21:22.800 you have to think
00:21:23.600 that's real.
00:21:25.160 I think that's real.
00:21:26.980 Now,
00:21:27.460 I don't know
00:21:27.780 what my odds are,
00:21:29.120 but I've just
00:21:29.700 factored that
00:21:30.280 into my decision.
00:21:34.120 Speaking of
00:21:35.100 that sort of thing,
00:21:36.540 Lindsey Graham
00:21:37.360 has said
00:21:38.380 in a video,
00:21:39.480 he's on video
00:21:40.300 saying that
00:21:41.120 there'd be riots
00:21:42.000 in the street
00:21:42.500 if Trump is prosecuted.
00:21:44.740 This is being
00:21:45.720 interpreted by the left
00:21:47.280 as an effort
00:21:49.440 to encourage
00:21:50.360 political violence.
00:21:51.460 everything is
00:21:54.500 upside down
00:21:55.100 and backwards.
00:21:56.460 Yes is no,
00:21:57.760 black is white, 0.97
00:21:59.420 wet is dry.
00:22:01.440 There's nothing
00:22:02.220 you can say
00:22:03.000 that someone
00:22:04.020 won't look at it
00:22:05.300 and say,
00:22:05.740 well,
00:22:05.980 I conclude
00:22:06.460 the opposite.
00:22:09.320 It seems to me
00:22:10.640 that Lindsey Graham
00:22:11.880 is trying to
00:22:12.520 decrease violence
00:22:14.060 by warning
00:22:15.220 that
00:22:15.640 prosecuting him.
00:22:18.300 Now,
00:22:18.460 keep in mind
00:22:19.120 that Lindsey Graham
00:22:21.280 is working
00:22:21.920 from current
00:22:22.660 information.
00:22:24.460 Our current
00:22:25.180 information
00:22:25.720 is that
00:22:26.400 there's no crime
00:22:27.340 to prosecute
00:22:29.100 Trump.
00:22:30.100 So under
00:22:30.680 the current
00:22:31.200 situation
00:22:31.760 that there's
00:22:32.260 no crime,
00:22:33.760 if Trump
00:22:34.720 gets prosecuted,
00:22:35.700 yeah,
00:22:36.000 there would be
00:22:36.520 a pretty big
00:22:37.440 public reaction.
00:22:39.600 So don't you
00:22:40.200 think it's a good
00:22:40.800 idea to not
00:22:41.620 prosecute an
00:22:42.360 ex-president
00:22:42.980 unless there's
00:22:43.880 an actual crime
00:22:44.640 in evidence?
00:22:46.160 So he's talking
00:22:47.360 kind of hypothetically,
00:22:48.380 so to imagine
00:22:49.760 that this is
00:22:50.620 promoting
00:22:51.820 violence,
00:22:53.420 do you think
00:22:55.020 that nobody
00:22:55.520 would have
00:22:55.900 thought of
00:22:56.420 rioting in
00:22:57.000 the streets
00:22:57.440 unless Lindsey 0.98
00:22:58.380 Graham had
00:22:58.920 mentioned it?
00:23:01.340 Do you think
00:23:02.120 the militias
00:23:03.340 are all there,
00:23:04.280 ooh,
00:23:04.740 we weren't
00:23:05.400 going to
00:23:05.660 activate,
00:23:06.260 but Lindsey 0.99
00:23:07.440 Graham said
00:23:08.360 something on
00:23:08.860 that video
00:23:09.320 once,
00:23:10.380 so we
00:23:11.320 better do it?
00:23:12.380 I don't think
00:23:13.020 it works that
00:23:13.560 way.
00:23:14.280 I feel like
00:23:14.920 Lindsey Graham
00:23:15.460 is simply
00:23:15.900 describing the
00:23:16.780 situation.
00:23:17.260 If you
00:23:18.460 imagine he's
00:23:19.100 causing the
00:23:19.760 situation,
00:23:20.800 you're not
00:23:22.020 really
00:23:22.600 understanding
00:23:24.460 the nature
00:23:24.980 of anything.
00:23:26.880 Lindsey Graham
00:23:27.540 can't cause
00:23:28.340 this.
00:23:29.340 He's just
00:23:30.120 describing it.
00:23:33.280 What do you
00:23:34.080 think?
00:23:34.640 What do you
00:23:35.180 think about
00:23:35.540 the truth
00:23:36.960 of it?
00:23:37.840 If Trump
00:23:38.780 gets,
00:23:39.900 let's say,
00:23:41.520 prosecuted,
00:23:42.640 do you think
00:23:43.720 there will be
00:23:44.100 riots in the
00:23:44.720 streets?
00:23:45.040 Yes or
00:23:47.120 no?
00:23:48.340 Riots in
00:23:48.900 the street,
00:23:49.340 if he gets
00:23:49.720 prosecuted,
00:23:50.580 yes or
00:23:50.920 no?
00:23:53.700 Oh,
00:23:54.160 this is
00:23:54.440 interesting.
00:23:55.440 It's mostly
00:23:55.960 no's.
00:23:58.040 Mostly
00:23:58.440 no's.
00:23:59.540 There are
00:23:59.980 some yes's,
00:24:01.660 but way more
00:24:02.320 no's.
00:24:03.580 Now,
00:24:03.760 why do you
00:24:04.080 say that?
00:24:06.320 See,
00:24:06.780 it's a trick
00:24:07.180 question.
00:24:07.940 It's actually
00:24:08.420 a terrible
00:24:08.820 question.
00:24:09.380 It's a very
00:24:09.780 unfair question.
00:24:11.240 Because you're
00:24:11.840 all forced to
00:24:12.800 make an
00:24:13.120 assumption.
00:24:13.440 If you
00:24:15.080 assumed that
00:24:15.680 he was
00:24:15.940 prosecuted for
00:24:16.720 an actual
00:24:17.240 real crime,
00:24:19.220 well,
00:24:19.520 there would
00:24:19.740 be,
00:24:20.080 I don't
00:24:20.300 think there
00:24:20.620 would be
00:24:20.840 riots.
00:24:22.240 Let me
00:24:22.860 say the
00:24:23.200 question better.
00:24:24.440 If you
00:24:25.040 believed he
00:24:25.660 was being
00:24:26.060 prosecuted for
00:24:26.880 an actual
00:24:27.460 crime,
00:24:29.020 a crime you
00:24:29.680 could actually
00:24:30.140 observe yourself
00:24:31.000 and say,
00:24:31.440 oh,
00:24:31.620 shit,
00:24:31.980 that's a
00:24:32.300 crime.
00:24:34.160 Do you
00:24:34.660 think there
00:24:34.940 would be
00:24:35.100 riots if
00:24:35.740 it was an
00:24:36.140 actual crime
00:24:36.880 that got
00:24:37.220 proven?
00:24:38.620 I think
00:24:39.220 there would
00:24:39.420 be protests,
00:24:40.240 but not a
00:24:40.680 big deal.
00:24:42.300 Not a
00:24:42.800 big deal.
00:24:43.100 If the
00:24:43.780 case is
00:24:44.240 made,
00:24:45.880 Republicans
00:24:47.100 are rule
00:24:47.940 followers.
00:24:49.560 Republicans
00:24:50.120 are not
00:24:50.540 going to
00:24:50.760 abandon
00:24:51.060 everything
00:24:51.780 that they
00:24:52.200 believe most
00:24:53.220 basically,
00:24:54.480 the rule
00:24:54.940 of law.
00:24:55.920 I don't
00:24:56.380 think
00:24:56.600 Republicans
00:24:57.080 are going
00:24:57.460 to abandon
00:24:57.820 the rule
00:24:58.340 of law
00:24:58.820 for one
00:25:00.180 candidate,
00:25:00.880 if they
00:25:01.280 believe the
00:25:01.720 law has
00:25:02.020 been broken.
00:25:02.980 Now,
00:25:03.300 the gray
00:25:05.500 area is if
00:25:07.200 Republicans
00:25:07.700 don't believe
00:25:08.600 he broke
00:25:09.020 any laws,
00:25:09.900 and he's
00:25:10.520 getting prosecuted
00:25:11.280 anyway.
00:25:11.620 In that
00:25:12.580 case,
00:25:13.780 if you
00:25:15.700 believed he
00:25:16.360 was unfairly
00:25:17.460 prosecuted,
00:25:18.700 riots or
00:25:19.220 no riots,
00:25:20.480 riots or
00:25:21.240 no riots,
00:25:21.900 if you
00:25:22.580 believed he
00:25:23.120 was unfairly
00:25:24.360 prosecuted,
00:25:26.140 riots or
00:25:26.580 no riots,
00:25:28.400 really?
00:25:29.620 People are
00:25:30.060 still saying
00:25:31.320 no riots.
00:25:33.460 Unfairly
00:25:34.160 prosecuted,
00:25:34.840 no riots.
00:25:35.480 Maybe.
00:25:39.380 Wow.
00:25:40.940 You know,
00:25:41.620 I think I'm
00:25:42.400 going to be
00:25:42.840 influenced by
00:25:43.540 your answers.
00:25:45.460 And now,
00:25:46.020 is the
00:25:46.700 reason just
00:25:47.280 because Republicans
00:25:48.100 don't riot?
00:25:49.740 Is that why?
00:25:51.840 Yeah,
00:25:52.360 somebody says
00:25:52.820 that directly.
00:25:53.800 Republicans
00:25:54.260 don't riot.
00:25:55.540 Huh.
00:25:57.060 Yeah,
00:25:57.520 you might be
00:25:57.900 right.
00:25:58.760 I'm not going
00:25:59.400 to disagree
00:25:59.820 with you.
00:26:00.180 I was curious
00:26:01.640 what you would
00:26:02.100 say.
00:26:02.300 Have you
00:26:10.740 ever been
00:26:11.440 frustrated
00:26:12.000 by the
00:26:13.840 fact that
00:26:14.380 the news
00:26:15.000 is almost
00:26:15.540 entirely about
00:26:16.380 stuff we
00:26:16.880 don't know?
00:26:19.120 And the
00:26:20.020 press won't
00:26:20.620 even ask the
00:26:21.280 right questions?
00:26:22.820 At one point,
00:26:23.860 I thought that
00:26:24.660 the way I
00:26:25.200 would,
00:26:26.640 let's say,
00:26:27.300 position myself
00:26:28.240 in the public,
00:26:30.500 at least in
00:26:31.180 terms of
00:26:31.480 talking about
00:26:31.880 politics,
00:26:32.300 was to be
00:26:33.260 the person
00:26:33.680 who helped
00:26:34.220 the press
00:26:34.680 ask the
00:26:35.280 right questions.
00:26:37.000 Because I'm
00:26:37.560 always frustrated
00:26:38.240 when the press
00:26:38.880 doesn't ask
00:26:39.400 the right
00:26:39.700 questions,
00:26:40.280 the one I
00:26:40.680 would ask.
00:26:42.120 And so I
00:26:42.540 thought,
00:26:42.820 wouldn't it
00:26:43.080 be useful
00:26:43.600 if there
00:26:44.060 was some
00:26:44.320 kind of
00:26:44.740 public
00:26:46.180 process
00:26:48.260 or some
00:26:49.080 kind of
00:26:49.320 website
00:26:49.720 where the
00:26:51.400 news media
00:26:52.080 could see
00:26:52.500 what the
00:26:52.800 public
00:26:53.080 wants them
00:26:53.680 to ask?
00:26:55.080 So you
00:26:55.480 could go
00:26:55.780 there and
00:26:56.060 say,
00:26:56.240 oh boy,
00:26:56.800 the public
00:26:57.180 really,
00:26:57.720 really wants
00:26:58.060 me to ask
00:26:58.440 this question.
00:26:59.140 It's the
00:26:59.440 one voted
00:26:59.920 to the top.
00:27:00.940 So I'm
00:27:01.280 definitely
00:27:01.540 going to ask
00:27:01.920 that one
00:27:02.220 first.
00:27:03.300 Wouldn't
00:27:03.520 that be
00:27:03.780 helpful?
00:27:05.360 And think
00:27:07.560 about the
00:27:07.900 things that
00:27:08.300 we don't
00:27:08.760 know about.
00:27:09.960 The public
00:27:10.580 doesn't really
00:27:11.180 know what we
00:27:11.700 spend money
00:27:12.240 on or why
00:27:13.800 because it's
00:27:14.580 too complicated
00:27:15.300 and the news
00:27:16.600 won't even bother
00:27:17.240 trying to explain
00:27:18.020 it because it's
00:27:18.500 too complicated.
00:27:19.520 So the biggest
00:27:20.200 thing that the
00:27:20.740 country does is
00:27:21.420 spend money.
00:27:23.080 All of our
00:27:23.720 priorities,
00:27:24.440 our policies,
00:27:25.760 all of our
00:27:26.280 everything is
00:27:28.120 represented by
00:27:29.940 spending money
00:27:30.700 on it.
00:27:31.500 So the
00:27:32.000 most important
00:27:32.640 thing the
00:27:32.980 country does,
00:27:34.300 the public
00:27:34.740 is completely
00:27:35.540 blind.
00:27:37.100 We really
00:27:37.900 don't know
00:27:38.440 what is
00:27:38.840 happening money
00:27:39.740 wise.
00:27:40.140 Nobody's
00:27:40.500 watching the
00:27:40.960 budget.
00:27:42.920 We don't
00:27:43.640 know what
00:27:43.940 any of these
00:27:44.360 investigations will
00:27:45.360 turn up.
00:27:46.380 So we don't
00:27:46.880 know what
00:27:47.620 Durham is
00:27:49.140 going to find
00:27:49.720 yet.
00:27:50.960 We had to
00:27:51.740 wait forever
00:27:52.320 for Mueller
00:27:53.140 and then we
00:27:53.860 couldn't agree
00:27:54.340 what the
00:27:55.200 document said.
00:27:57.140 now we're
00:27:58.480 waiting for
00:27:58.960 this Mar-a-Lago
00:28:00.240 stuff and
00:28:01.480 we're waiting
00:28:01.940 for something
00:28:03.640 about Trump's
00:28:04.680 taxes.
00:28:06.360 We're always
00:28:07.180 waiting for an
00:28:08.080 investigation to
00:28:09.240 conclude.
00:28:11.360 You can't make
00:28:12.200 any decisions
00:28:12.840 when you're
00:28:13.300 waiting for
00:28:13.860 stuff to be
00:28:14.800 known.
00:28:15.940 We don't know
00:28:16.720 what's in the
00:28:17.120 Mar-a-Lago
00:28:17.620 boxes.
00:28:18.880 We don't know
00:28:19.500 what the Iran
00:28:20.060 deal looks like.
00:28:21.180 We don't know
00:28:21.720 what was in
00:28:22.140 Hillary's emails.
00:28:23.140 We don't know
00:28:23.540 if the UFOs are
00:28:24.500 real or what the
00:28:25.180 government knows
00:28:25.820 about it and
00:28:27.120 we don't know
00:28:27.540 how we're
00:28:27.840 going to ever
00:28:28.160 pay off all
00:28:28.720 our debt,
00:28:30.060 national debt.
00:28:36.080 Yeah.
00:28:37.480 So it's
00:28:40.060 really frustrating
00:28:41.640 how many things
00:28:42.180 we don't know.
00:28:43.060 Now speaking
00:28:43.440 of the Iran
00:28:43.980 deal, Israel
00:28:47.040 basically says
00:28:47.920 they're not
00:28:48.260 going to sign
00:28:48.720 on to any
00:28:49.300 kind of a
00:28:49.740 deal that
00:28:50.860 would give
00:28:51.160 Iran a path 1.00
00:28:52.080 to a nuclear
00:28:53.820 device.
00:28:54.740 now Israel's 0.90
00:28:56.680 complaint is
00:28:58.800 that if Iran 0.89
00:28:59.980 gets a nuke
00:29:01.360 it will cause
00:29:02.460 the other
00:29:02.940 nations in the
00:29:03.860 area to need
00:29:04.720 nukes of their
00:29:05.400 own.
00:29:06.340 So then Saudi 0.91
00:29:06.980 Arabia is going 1.00
00:29:07.760 to say well
00:29:08.300 if you got
00:29:08.880 nukes we
00:29:09.380 better have
00:29:09.800 some nukes
00:29:10.360 and then
00:29:11.320 everybody's got
00:29:11.900 nukes and
00:29:12.440 it's more
00:29:12.760 dangerous.
00:29:14.360 What do you
00:29:14.760 think of that
00:29:15.140 argument?
00:29:16.180 That if Iran 0.99
00:29:16.840 gets nukes
00:29:17.620 the neighboring
00:29:19.480 countries that
00:29:20.240 maybe are afraid
00:29:20.940 of Iran might
00:29:21.980 have to get
00:29:22.400 some nukes
00:29:22.860 of their
00:29:23.140 own.
00:29:24.420 Well here's
00:29:26.460 what I would
00:29:26.900 do if I
00:29:27.500 were Israel.
00:29:29.500 I would try
00:29:30.320 to get the
00:29:31.040 countries that
00:29:31.980 would consider
00:29:32.620 nukes to
00:29:33.260 actually say
00:29:33.860 they would
00:29:34.340 build nukes
00:29:35.040 if Iran 0.82
00:29:35.500 does.
00:29:37.220 Wouldn't it
00:29:37.720 be useful
00:29:38.180 for Saudi
00:29:39.460 Arabia to
00:29:40.040 say look
00:29:40.460 we don't
00:29:40.880 want Iran 1.00
00:29:41.500 to have a
00:29:41.860 nuke but
00:29:42.860 if they
00:29:43.100 build one
00:29:43.560 we're
00:29:43.840 definitely
00:29:44.160 building one
00:29:44.800 and here's
00:29:45.640 our plans.
00:29:47.400 Here's our
00:29:47.880 budget.
00:29:48.860 We've already
00:29:49.400 approved a
00:29:49.920 budget to
00:29:50.420 build a
00:29:50.740 nuclear program.
00:29:51.580 But if
00:29:53.020 Iran doesn't 1.00
00:29:53.640 build one
00:29:54.020 we won't
00:29:54.440 do it
00:29:54.700 either.
00:29:55.860 So here's
00:29:56.260 what I
00:29:56.820 think Israel 0.93
00:29:58.060 should do
00:29:58.500 for persuasion.
00:30:00.860 They should
00:30:01.340 somehow make
00:30:02.060 visual the
00:30:03.660 fact that the
00:30:04.500 Iran deal is
00:30:05.220 not about
00:30:05.600 Iran.
00:30:06.820 It's about
00:30:07.320 opening up the
00:30:08.040 nuclear box for
00:30:09.040 all of the
00:30:09.580 Middle East.
00:30:10.720 Because there's
00:30:11.340 nobody who
00:30:11.900 thinks that a
00:30:12.560 whole bunch of
00:30:13.080 more nuclear
00:30:13.620 powers in the
00:30:14.360 Middle East is
00:30:14.940 good for
00:30:15.260 anybody.
00:30:17.000 So I think
00:30:17.960 that would be
00:30:18.380 their best
00:30:18.820 play.
00:30:19.680 Their best
00:30:20.120 play would
00:30:20.580 say if
00:30:21.680 you don't
00:30:22.000 stop it
00:30:22.460 in Iran
00:30:22.940 it's going
00:30:23.520 to be
00:30:23.720 everywhere.
00:30:25.920 Of course
00:30:26.380 Israel would 1.00
00:30:26.980 like to be
00:30:27.380 the exception
00:30:27.980 and have
00:30:28.660 their nukes
00:30:29.560 with nobody
00:30:30.020 having them.
00:30:31.940 But yeah
00:30:33.740 I think that's
00:30:34.360 the angle
00:30:35.240 they have to
00:30:35.660 go for.
00:30:37.740 If the
00:30:38.680 argument is
00:30:39.160 limited to
00:30:39.680 just Iran
00:30:40.500 getting a
00:30:41.060 nuke
00:30:41.380 apparently
00:30:42.660 that's not
00:30:43.640 having an
00:30:44.420 influence on
00:30:45.080 Biden.
00:30:46.600 But also
00:30:47.040 what do you
00:30:47.360 think Israel 0.93
00:30:48.280 is going
00:30:48.640 to have
00:30:48.900 to do
00:30:49.380 if Iran 0.82
00:30:50.900 and the
00:30:51.940 United States
00:30:52.520 and Europe
00:30:52.920 come up
00:30:53.380 with some
00:30:53.680 kind of
00:30:53.960 an Iran 0.74
00:30:54.360 deal?
00:30:55.760 Because Israel
00:30:56.560 is not going
00:30:56.940 to sign off
00:30:57.440 on it no
00:30:57.820 matter what.
00:30:59.340 So it would
00:30:59.820 be a
00:31:00.260 European
00:31:01.060 American
00:31:01.820 Iran deal
00:31:02.720 if there is
00:31:03.180 one.
00:31:04.040 But what do
00:31:04.560 you think
00:31:04.760 Israel is
00:31:05.220 going to
00:31:05.400 do?
00:31:05.560 I think
00:31:07.420 Israel would 1.00
00:31:08.000 have to
00:31:08.660 be far
00:31:10.340 more aggressive
00:31:11.240 in destroying
00:31:12.120 their assets
00:31:12.740 and their
00:31:13.260 scientists
00:31:14.260 wherever they
00:31:14.980 can find
00:31:15.380 them.
00:31:17.200 So if
00:31:18.360 you assume
00:31:18.860 that Israel
00:31:19.500 will not
00:31:20.340 tolerate a
00:31:21.100 nuclear Iran
00:31:21.920 and I
00:31:22.320 don't think
00:31:22.660 they will
00:31:23.080 then a
00:31:25.200 peace deal
00:31:26.480 with Iran
00:31:26.980 guarantees war.
00:31:29.280 Doesn't it?
00:31:30.760 I mean a
00:31:31.440 nuclear agreement
00:31:32.580 with Iran.
00:31:33.280 A nuclear 0.91
00:31:33.780 agreement with
00:31:34.460 Iran should 0.99
00:31:35.040 guarantee war 0.90
00:31:36.020 not stop it.
00:31:38.760 And Israel 0.51
00:31:39.260 I think can
00:31:39.820 make that case
00:31:40.520 plain.
00:31:41.740 Look if
00:31:42.460 you make a
00:31:43.100 deal and
00:31:44.060 we're on
00:31:44.440 our own
00:31:44.820 it's war.
00:31:46.780 I mean it
00:31:47.180 might be a
00:31:47.740 covert war.
00:31:49.060 It might
00:31:49.300 be entirely
00:31:50.240 deniable
00:31:51.320 kind of war
00:31:51.900 like oh
00:31:52.320 we don't
00:31:52.700 know why
00:31:53.000 that blew
00:31:53.380 up.
00:31:54.180 But it
00:31:54.540 is war.
00:31:56.020 I mean
00:31:56.160 it's full
00:31:56.840 military
00:31:57.840 blow up
00:31:59.400 shit
00:31:59.680 kill people
00:32:00.340 war.
00:32:01.520 So I
00:32:02.140 don't think
00:32:02.460 Israel is
00:32:03.000 doing a
00:32:03.340 good job
00:32:03.940 of laying
00:32:05.140 out the
00:32:05.560 alternative
00:32:06.020 path.
00:32:07.520 The
00:32:07.760 alternative
00:32:08.180 path is
00:32:09.140 nuclearized
00:32:10.760 Middle East
00:32:11.380 and war.
00:32:14.060 See I
00:32:15.520 think Israel 0.93
00:32:16.020 is just
00:32:16.440 they don't
00:32:18.080 help themselves
00:32:19.600 by being
00:32:20.220 subtle.
00:32:21.680 If they
00:32:22.140 say stuff
00:32:22.600 like well
00:32:23.220 we'll have
00:32:23.900 to take
00:32:24.300 greater
00:32:25.180 action
00:32:25.720 than Iran 0.82
00:32:26.380 or something
00:32:27.020 like that
00:32:27.540 just say
00:32:28.480 it's war.
00:32:29.700 Just call
00:32:30.200 it what it
00:32:30.540 is.
00:32:31.380 If you
00:32:31.740 make a
00:32:32.100 deal with
00:32:32.500 Iran
00:32:32.840 that's war.
00:32:35.020 We're
00:32:35.500 going to
00:32:35.700 pull out
00:32:37.140 all the
00:32:37.520 stops
00:32:37.960 to directly
00:32:39.320 attack
00:32:39.800 Iran's 0.89
00:32:40.580 infrastructure
00:32:41.380 for supporting
00:32:42.380 a nuclear
00:32:42.920 bomb.
00:32:45.400 Because you
00:32:46.020 know Israel
00:32:46.540 will right?
00:32:48.080 Do you
00:32:48.340 think Israel 0.93
00:32:48.880 is going
00:32:49.160 to go
00:32:49.380 soft?
00:32:50.860 Do you
00:32:51.400 think Israel 0.93
00:32:51.940 would say
00:32:52.420 well you
00:32:54.560 know we
00:32:55.160 wanted to
00:32:56.000 stop them
00:32:56.440 from getting
00:32:56.820 a nuke
00:32:57.240 but now
00:32:58.680 that this
00:32:59.640 deal is
00:33:00.140 signed
00:33:00.440 we'll just
00:33:01.040 live with
00:33:01.440 it.
00:33:02.120 You think
00:33:02.500 they'll do
00:33:02.800 that?
00:33:04.580 No.
00:33:05.040 I think
00:33:05.300 Israel's 0.75
00:33:06.020 persuasion
00:33:07.340 game is a
00:33:08.000 little weak
00:33:08.480 right now
00:33:08.940 which is
00:33:09.300 unusual.
00:33:10.360 Very
00:33:10.640 unusual.
00:33:11.380 I think
00:33:12.060 they could
00:33:12.460 increase
00:33:12.860 their
00:33:13.060 persuasion
00:33:13.500 game
00:33:13.760 quite a
00:33:14.080 bit.
00:33:15.820 All right.
00:33:21.260 So I
00:33:21.900 asked this
00:33:22.280 question about
00:33:22.980 voting.
00:33:23.600 Here's
00:33:23.800 something I
00:33:24.260 had a
00:33:24.500 big gap
00:33:25.040 in my
00:33:25.360 knowledge.
00:33:27.200 So for
00:33:27.860 those
00:33:28.220 voting
00:33:28.780 precincts
00:33:29.480 where
00:33:29.720 everything's
00:33:30.200 on paper
00:33:30.660 and then
00:33:32.740 they
00:33:33.020 tally up
00:33:33.940 the results
00:33:34.560 when they
00:33:36.620 transmit
00:33:37.080 their
00:33:37.380 totals
00:33:37.900 to the
00:33:38.520 big
00:33:39.100 database
00:33:39.600 in the
00:33:39.940 sky
00:33:40.240 that gives
00:33:40.760 you the
00:33:41.040 total
00:33:41.300 totals
00:33:41.760 they
00:33:42.800 can
00:33:43.000 check
00:33:43.300 their
00:33:43.500 subtotals
00:33:44.080 got there
00:33:44.740 correctly
00:33:45.180 right?
00:33:46.600 So in
00:33:46.920 other words
00:33:47.400 do we
00:33:47.760 have to
00:33:48.120 worry
00:33:48.480 about
00:33:49.480 the
00:33:49.960 digital
00:33:51.120 path
00:33:53.080 from the
00:33:54.200 local
00:33:54.620 precinct
00:33:55.240 to the
00:33:56.060 final
00:33:56.320 database?
00:33:57.320 Because the
00:33:58.020 local
00:33:58.280 precinct
00:33:58.760 can say
00:33:59.300 all right
00:33:59.760 we had
00:34:01.100 X number
00:34:02.260 of votes
00:34:02.600 for Biden
00:34:03.100 did it
00:34:03.660 get recorded
00:34:04.200 that way?
00:34:04.920 Yep.
00:34:05.560 X number
00:34:06.040 of votes
00:34:06.340 for Biden.
00:34:06.760 So I
00:34:09.000 think that's
00:34:09.480 probably not
00:34:09.980 a big
00:34:10.300 risk
00:34:10.760 because the
00:34:12.200 precincts
00:34:12.720 probably
00:34:13.300 check to
00:34:13.840 make sure
00:34:14.160 their data
00:34:14.580 got there
00:34:15.060 if they
00:34:16.640 can and
00:34:17.180 I think
00:34:17.440 they can.
00:34:19.320 And I
00:34:19.880 think it's
00:34:20.120 even public
00:34:20.640 right?
00:34:21.480 It's probably
00:34:21.940 public what
00:34:22.540 the precinct
00:34:23.180 voted and
00:34:23.940 then it
00:34:24.200 would be
00:34:24.480 public on
00:34:25.180 the main
00:34:25.520 database so
00:34:26.180 you can see
00:34:26.520 for yourself
00:34:26.980 I think.
00:34:27.980 So is
00:34:30.060 the only
00:34:30.400 place that
00:34:30.900 we should
00:34:31.260 be worried
00:34:31.820 about
00:34:32.500 digital
00:34:33.600 voting
00:34:34.380 is where
00:34:35.880 the voting
00:34:36.360 machines
00:34:36.900 themselves
00:34:37.640 were
00:34:41.640 tabulating
00:34:42.580 votes at
00:34:43.380 the local
00:34:43.780 precinct and
00:34:45.100 then transmitting
00:34:46.140 it digitally.
00:34:46.800 Is that the
00:34:47.300 only place
00:34:47.960 that we
00:34:48.340 would have
00:34:48.620 a question?
00:34:50.020 Because I
00:34:50.360 don't know
00:34:50.680 if that
00:34:51.040 even applies
00:34:51.680 to any
00:34:52.000 of the
00:34:53.040 battlefield
00:34:54.760 places
00:34:56.200 does it?
00:34:57.240 Are there
00:34:57.700 any
00:34:57.940 battlefield
00:34:58.500 election
00:34:59.600 locations
00:35:00.520 where the
00:35:02.100 voting is
00:35:02.660 not done
00:35:03.360 on paper?
00:35:05.980 Because I
00:35:06.740 know we do
00:35:07.180 have places
00:35:07.640 where people
00:35:08.320 vote entirely
00:35:09.080 on digital
00:35:09.680 machines but
00:35:10.940 I don't know
00:35:11.360 if those are
00:35:11.780 battleground
00:35:12.300 places.
00:35:13.340 Are the
00:35:13.700 battleground
00:35:14.200 places mostly
00:35:15.020 paper?
00:35:20.800 Somebody
00:35:21.440 says
00:35:21.720 correct.
00:35:25.280 Remember
00:35:25.920 Romney got
00:35:26.560 zero votes
00:35:27.240 in some
00:35:27.620 Philadelphia
00:35:28.060 precincts
00:35:28.740 yet?
00:35:31.880 Right?
00:35:33.180 They don't
00:35:33.780 count at
00:35:34.320 the precinct
00:35:34.860 level.
00:35:36.060 What?
00:35:37.500 You're
00:35:37.980 telling me a
00:35:38.380 precinct doesn't
00:35:39.280 count its
00:35:39.800 own votes?
00:35:42.320 Are they
00:35:43.040 sent to a
00:35:43.620 center that's
00:35:44.200 counted?
00:35:45.760 So do they
00:35:46.360 physically
00:35:46.960 transport them
00:35:48.020 before they're
00:35:48.660 counted?
00:35:50.680 Oh my
00:35:51.460 God.
00:35:52.120 Really?
00:35:52.420 Really?
00:35:54.400 Really?
00:35:54.920 I don't
00:35:56.400 believe that.
00:35:57.640 I don't
00:35:58.460 believe that
00:35:59.060 paper leaves
00:36:01.140 the facility
00:36:02.620 uncounted.
00:36:05.180 Are you
00:36:05.980 kidding me?
00:36:07.180 There's a lot
00:36:07.740 of people who
00:36:08.220 think that
00:36:08.800 locally the
00:36:11.100 votes are
00:36:11.560 taken and
00:36:12.200 you've got the
00:36:12.660 votes on these
00:36:13.300 ballots on
00:36:13.960 pieces of
00:36:14.500 paper and
00:36:15.560 that the
00:36:15.880 pieces of
00:36:16.360 paper are
00:36:16.780 transported to
00:36:17.620 another facility
00:36:18.700 for counting.
00:36:19.460 they're not
00:36:21.060 counted locally.
00:36:23.680 I guess that
00:36:24.440 makes sense
00:36:24.980 because you
00:36:25.360 wouldn't want
00:36:25.700 a counting
00:36:26.220 feature at
00:36:27.860 every little
00:36:28.580 local voting
00:36:29.280 place.
00:36:30.100 Okay.
00:36:31.020 I guess I'm
00:36:31.780 going to
00:36:32.920 accept that
00:36:33.420 because it
00:36:33.880 does make
00:36:34.420 sense that
00:36:34.940 you wouldn't
00:36:35.480 want a
00:36:36.880 counting
00:36:37.240 function at
00:36:38.120 every little
00:36:38.640 local polling
00:36:39.400 place.
00:36:42.780 So then
00:36:44.180 how would we
00:36:44.800 know if
00:36:45.500 some of it
00:36:46.040 disappeared?
00:36:47.240 The only way
00:36:47.940 you'd know,
00:36:50.540 well, you
00:36:52.360 could count
00:36:53.060 the total
00:36:53.500 number of
00:36:53.920 votes, right?
00:36:56.620 So would
00:36:58.200 the local
00:36:58.840 precinct at
00:36:59.920 least know the
00:37:00.580 total number
00:37:01.180 of people who
00:37:01.700 voted?
00:37:02.700 So they would
00:37:03.140 know if the
00:37:03.680 total got
00:37:04.400 through, right?
00:37:06.780 Yeah.
00:37:07.460 So here's the
00:37:08.200 thing that nobody's
00:37:08.860 done a good job
00:37:09.540 of explaining to
00:37:10.360 the public,
00:37:11.720 which is
00:37:13.040 explain the
00:37:13.720 whole process,
00:37:14.920 you know,
00:37:15.140 like as if
00:37:16.200 we're idiots
00:37:16.760 because we
00:37:17.320 are.
00:37:17.520 You know,
00:37:18.120 put it in
00:37:18.540 simple terms.
00:37:19.980 All right,
00:37:20.200 person votes,
00:37:21.520 their piece of
00:37:22.040 paper goes
00:37:22.720 here,
00:37:23.600 it goes in
00:37:24.140 this pile,
00:37:25.080 then somebody
00:37:25.660 batches them
00:37:26.240 up and they
00:37:26.660 put them in
00:37:27.020 this truck,
00:37:27.660 and then the
00:37:28.040 truck goes
00:37:28.460 here.
00:37:28.940 I want it
00:37:29.440 that way
00:37:29.860 because I
00:37:31.840 want somebody
00:37:32.260 to explain,
00:37:33.500 okay,
00:37:34.000 because we
00:37:34.640 check here
00:37:35.260 and we
00:37:35.620 check here,
00:37:36.560 we can know
00:37:37.260 with certainty
00:37:37.740 that there
00:37:38.180 was no
00:37:38.480 problem in
00:37:39.080 between.
00:37:40.640 Right?
00:37:41.220 Wouldn't you
00:37:41.480 like to know
00:37:41.920 that?
00:37:42.780 But,
00:37:43.560 because this
00:37:44.700 happens and
00:37:45.260 then this
00:37:45.600 happens,
00:37:45.980 there's
00:37:46.680 still a
00:37:47.140 little bit
00:37:47.580 of risk
00:37:48.120 here,
00:37:48.760 but we
00:37:49.860 haven't seen
00:37:50.380 any problems,
00:37:51.040 but it's
00:37:51.680 something that's
00:37:52.240 a little bit
00:37:52.760 non-transparent.
00:37:54.800 Wouldn't you
00:37:55.340 like to know
00:37:55.760 that?
00:37:58.260 Yeah,
00:37:58.760 I guess I
00:37:59.720 realize the
00:38:00.260 process is a
00:38:01.000 little different
00:38:01.440 in every state,
00:38:02.500 but I think we
00:38:03.100 can get a
00:38:03.760 general sense,
00:38:05.400 at least for the
00:38:05.940 battleground places,
00:38:07.420 how do they
00:38:07.960 even handle it?
00:38:08.580 Because it
00:38:10.360 seems to me
00:38:10.880 there are
00:38:11.140 probably local
00:38:12.640 systems that
00:38:13.460 are completely
00:38:14.160 secure,
00:38:15.600 and I'll bet
00:38:16.900 there are some
00:38:17.380 that aren't.
00:38:19.000 In other
00:38:19.320 words,
00:38:19.580 if they all
00:38:19.980 do it
00:38:20.260 differently,
00:38:21.540 well,
00:38:22.100 let's use
00:38:22.600 some common
00:38:23.060 sense.
00:38:24.800 If the
00:38:25.840 election
00:38:26.160 processes are
00:38:27.160 different at
00:38:28.300 different places,
00:38:29.900 doesn't that
00:38:30.560 pretty much
00:38:31.160 guarantee that
00:38:31.820 some of them
00:38:32.240 are not good?
00:38:34.000 Do you
00:38:34.480 suppose that
00:38:35.000 they use all
00:38:35.600 kinds of
00:38:35.940 different processes
00:38:36.780 and they're
00:38:37.940 all just as
00:38:38.620 good?
00:38:39.900 They're all
00:38:40.360 just as good.
00:38:41.900 It seems very
00:38:42.500 unlikely,
00:38:43.060 right?
00:38:43.660 It seems to me
00:38:44.440 that the
00:38:45.100 expensive ones
00:38:45.960 are better,
00:38:46.820 and the
00:38:47.320 cheaper ones
00:38:47.900 are worse.
00:38:49.500 Probably it's
00:38:50.200 just money.
00:38:51.360 Money plus
00:38:52.100 time to
00:38:52.580 implement,
00:38:53.060 right?
00:38:53.780 So you would
00:38:54.540 expect if it's
00:38:55.260 like everything
00:38:55.820 else in the
00:38:56.340 world,
00:38:56.740 there's this
00:38:57.100 big range of
00:38:58.020 very secure
00:38:59.280 to, well,
00:39:00.040 we're not so
00:39:00.520 sure.
00:39:02.960 I'd love to
00:39:03.700 know how that
00:39:04.320 breaks down.
00:39:05.920 And whether
00:39:06.560 the battle
00:39:07.000 ground states
00:39:07.640 or even
00:39:08.120 anything we
00:39:09.500 should worry
00:39:09.840 about.
00:39:13.000 I'm on the
00:39:13.720 right trail
00:39:14.200 now,
00:39:14.600 somebody says.
00:39:15.460 It's the
00:39:15.860 same trail
00:39:16.280 I've always
00:39:16.660 been on.
00:39:17.840 There's not
00:39:18.240 enough transparency
00:39:19.420 in the election
00:39:20.760 system for the
00:39:21.920 public to
00:39:22.460 actually have
00:39:22.940 a reasonable
00:39:24.420 opinion about
00:39:25.240 what happened.
00:39:28.600 Yeah, I've
00:39:29.240 been saying that
00:39:29.840 the elections
00:39:30.360 are not fully
00:39:31.780 auditable,
00:39:33.340 but maybe
00:39:34.500 they're closer
00:39:35.120 to fully
00:39:35.640 auditable
00:39:36.040 than I
00:39:36.480 know.
00:39:37.440 Maybe, for
00:39:38.620 example,
00:39:39.380 maybe the
00:39:40.060 battleground
00:39:41.500 places are
00:39:42.180 the most
00:39:42.620 secure.
00:39:44.900 Right?
00:39:45.940 If you
00:39:46.540 happen to
00:39:47.060 be in
00:39:47.880 charge of
00:39:48.380 a battleground
00:39:49.140 state,
00:39:50.520 don't you
00:39:50.840 think you
00:39:51.180 could get
00:39:51.520 more money
00:39:52.040 from the
00:39:52.460 state to
00:39:53.060 make sure
00:39:53.400 yours was
00:39:54.000 done right?
00:39:55.120 You'd say,
00:39:55.680 we're the
00:39:55.880 battleground
00:39:56.300 state.
00:39:56.900 We're the
00:39:57.240 most important
00:39:57.780 one.
00:39:58.300 Give us a
00:39:58.780 big budget
00:39:59.240 so we do
00:39:59.720 this right
00:40:00.180 because we
00:40:00.560 don't want
00:40:00.880 any questions
00:40:01.620 in a
00:40:02.440 battleground
00:40:03.000 state.
00:40:04.920 I feel
00:40:06.620 as though
00:40:07.120 there's a
00:40:08.860 lot to
00:40:09.120 know here.
00:40:10.680 All right.
00:40:12.520 Rasmussen
00:40:13.160 asked American
00:40:14.260 adults about
00:40:15.040 their opinions
00:40:15.620 about the
00:40:16.100 public school
00:40:16.620 system here.
00:40:17.920 Only 8%
00:40:19.160 of American
00:40:19.860 adults rated
00:40:21.300 the performance
00:40:22.020 of public
00:40:22.540 schools
00:40:23.120 excellent.
00:40:24.780 Another 22%
00:40:26.080 said good.
00:40:27.540 But generally
00:40:29.960 speaking, it's
00:40:31.520 a lot like
00:40:32.140 people think
00:40:33.020 of Congress.
00:40:34.580 If you ask
00:40:35.380 the public,
00:40:36.240 is Congress
00:40:37.260 good or bad,
00:40:38.140 they'll say,
00:40:38.580 disapprove,
00:40:39.820 Congress is
00:40:40.720 bad.
00:40:41.420 But then you
00:40:41.920 say, but what
00:40:42.520 about your
00:40:43.220 representative?
00:40:44.040 They'll say,
00:40:44.360 well, my
00:40:44.800 representative is
00:40:45.380 pretty good.
00:40:46.520 I got lucky.
00:40:48.020 Good thing
00:40:48.500 my representative
00:40:53.080 is good.
00:40:54.460 Well, people
00:40:55.240 say the same
00:40:55.800 thing about
00:40:56.180 the schools.
00:40:57.540 If you ask
00:40:58.220 them if the
00:40:58.640 school systems
00:40:59.480 are good,
00:41:00.220 they're likely
00:41:01.240 to give a
00:41:01.920 negative answer.
00:41:03.360 But if you
00:41:03.840 ask them if
00:41:04.360 their school
00:41:05.020 is good,
00:41:05.640 they'll say,
00:41:05.960 oh, my
00:41:06.280 school's pretty
00:41:06.740 good.
00:41:08.040 But I hear
00:41:08.520 those other
00:41:08.980 schools are
00:41:09.360 pretty bad.
00:41:13.300 Now, I've
00:41:14.180 told you before
00:41:14.860 that when I
00:41:15.520 tell you
00:41:16.180 optimistic
00:41:16.840 stories about
00:41:18.080 technology,
00:41:19.720 some new
00:41:20.220 invention or
00:41:21.160 breakthrough,
00:41:22.460 you should
00:41:22.840 always take
00:41:23.340 it in the
00:41:23.820 following way.
00:41:25.460 Probably not
00:41:26.220 true.
00:41:27.540 stories about
00:41:29.260 technical and
00:41:30.180 scientific
00:41:30.660 breakthroughs are
00:41:32.520 almost never
00:41:33.300 true.
00:41:34.700 I'd say 95%
00:41:36.300 of them are
00:41:36.780 false.
00:41:38.600 But aren't
00:41:40.020 they fun?
00:41:41.180 When you hear
00:41:41.920 some big
00:41:42.360 breakthrough that
00:41:42.980 could change
00:41:43.380 the world in
00:41:43.940 a positive
00:41:44.340 way, don't
00:41:45.400 you like to
00:41:46.100 at least live
00:41:47.440 with the
00:41:47.800 thought that
00:41:48.260 maybe it
00:41:48.660 could be
00:41:48.920 true?
00:41:50.140 So when I
00:41:50.800 tell you that
00:41:52.300 there's a new
00:41:52.780 breakthrough, which
00:41:53.500 I'm going to
00:41:53.780 tell you in a
00:41:54.220 moment, if
00:41:55.820 it's true, it's
00:41:57.840 insanely good.
00:41:59.700 It's probably
00:42:00.200 not true.
00:42:01.400 But can we
00:42:02.300 agree to act
00:42:03.200 as though it's
00:42:03.800 true because
00:42:05.560 it'll feel good?
00:42:07.320 That's all we're
00:42:08.100 trying to do.
00:42:08.780 We're just
00:42:09.140 trying to feel
00:42:09.620 good.
00:42:10.140 All right?
00:42:11.280 Well, MIT, the
00:42:12.660 smartest people in
00:42:13.760 the universe, say
00:42:15.440 they've invented a
00:42:16.600 cheap battery.
00:42:17.260 battery, and
00:42:18.700 what's amazing
00:42:19.660 about it is
00:42:20.460 not just that
00:42:21.220 it's maybe
00:42:21.900 one-sixth of
00:42:22.940 the cost of
00:42:24.460 traditional
00:42:24.920 batteries, but
00:42:26.320 it's made with
00:42:27.120 non-rare
00:42:28.280 materials, aluminum,
00:42:30.340 sulfur, and
00:42:31.120 rock-solid
00:42:31.940 crystals.
00:42:33.180 So they
00:42:33.980 experimented a
00:42:35.160 bunch and
00:42:35.960 found that
00:42:36.640 these domestically
00:42:38.900 abundant
00:42:39.460 materials can
00:42:41.300 make a
00:42:42.120 darn good
00:42:42.820 battery.
00:42:44.040 Now, it
00:42:44.840 might not be
00:42:45.700 efficient enough
00:42:46.820 for putting
00:42:47.640 into your
00:42:47.960 phone or
00:42:48.600 putting into
00:42:49.060 your car,
00:42:49.840 although they're
00:42:50.360 thinking of
00:42:51.020 cars later.
00:42:52.260 But it would
00:42:53.060 be efficient
00:42:53.600 enough.
00:42:55.340 It would be
00:42:56.380 efficient enough
00:42:57.160 for maybe
00:42:58.340 storing solar
00:43:00.040 power.
00:43:01.660 So if you've
00:43:02.420 got a big
00:43:02.820 grid storage,
00:43:03.800 it might work
00:43:04.240 for that.
00:43:04.980 And it might
00:43:05.380 be one-sixth
00:43:06.120 the cost.
00:43:07.540 Now, there
00:43:08.620 are some
00:43:09.100 technical issues
00:43:09.920 about the
00:43:10.460 temperature it
00:43:11.800 operates on.
00:43:12.900 There's some
00:43:13.320 issues about
00:43:14.140 bauxite mining
00:43:16.220 to make
00:43:17.020 aluminum.
00:43:18.620 So as
00:43:19.480 soon as you
00:43:19.880 get into the
00:43:20.320 details of
00:43:21.020 any of these
00:43:21.400 scientific
00:43:21.880 breakthroughs,
00:43:22.860 you usually
00:43:23.680 run into a
00:43:24.420 wall.
00:43:25.700 It's like,
00:43:26.080 oh, I
00:43:27.040 thought this
00:43:27.560 was abundant,
00:43:28.560 but it
00:43:29.000 turns out if
00:43:30.020 you made
00:43:30.540 more of it,
00:43:31.080 you'd pollute
00:43:31.540 too much.
00:43:32.580 So there's
00:43:33.960 always a
00:43:34.280 problem you
00:43:34.760 don't foresee.
00:43:35.540 But that's
00:43:35.800 true of
00:43:36.060 everything.
00:43:36.880 It doesn't
00:43:37.360 mean those
00:43:37.740 are unsolvable,
00:43:39.320 but don't
00:43:40.440 imagine that
00:43:41.020 there are no
00:43:41.360 problems.
00:43:41.740 Now, it
00:43:44.800 turns out that
00:43:45.300 they accidentally
00:43:46.100 solved another
00:43:46.960 of the biggest
00:43:47.520 problems in
00:43:48.240 batteries.
00:43:49.760 One of the
00:43:50.260 biggest problems
00:43:50.840 in batteries is
00:43:52.360 that if they
00:43:53.560 operate for a
00:43:54.220 while, they
00:43:54.540 grow these
00:43:55.040 dendrites.
00:43:56.760 There's something
00:43:57.320 that's like little
00:43:58.080 growths inside the
00:43:59.620 battery that start
00:44:00.960 growing.
00:44:01.820 And if they
00:44:02.280 connect, it
00:44:03.240 shorts out the
00:44:03.800 battery and you
00:44:04.440 got problems.
00:44:05.560 So that's a
00:44:06.080 normal thing that
00:44:06.820 happens to older
00:44:07.500 batteries, is that
00:44:09.040 they wear out in a
00:44:10.040 specific kind of
00:44:10.920 way, through
00:44:12.120 these dendrites
00:44:13.120 growing.
00:44:14.040 But this new
00:44:14.920 technology doesn't
00:44:15.840 do that.
00:44:17.040 So they ended
00:44:17.780 up solving the
00:44:19.140 biggest malfunction
00:44:20.380 problem of
00:44:21.160 batteries,
00:44:22.580 accidentally.
00:44:23.240 They weren't
00:44:23.540 trying to solve
00:44:24.120 that, it just
00:44:24.660 happened.
00:44:26.160 So they're way
00:44:27.600 more efficient.
00:44:29.240 They don't have
00:44:30.120 the risk of
00:44:30.720 catching on fire
00:44:31.620 the way lithium
00:44:33.480 batteries do, which
00:44:34.520 is a gigantic
00:44:35.080 problem.
00:44:36.620 Don't know how
00:44:37.380 much they degrade,
00:44:38.440 that's a good
00:44:38.920 question.
00:44:39.660 Don't know how
00:44:40.100 long they last.
00:44:40.920 Which is
00:44:41.620 probably going to
00:44:42.580 be the main
00:44:43.380 question, right?
00:44:44.120 How long they
00:44:44.660 last.
00:44:47.540 All right.
00:44:48.740 So, if this
00:44:51.240 is true, then
00:44:52.380 Elon Musk has
00:44:53.380 been right all
00:44:54.000 along.
00:44:56.000 Because Musk has
00:44:57.160 said that you
00:44:58.400 could power the
00:44:58.940 whole country with,
00:45:01.120 relatively speaking,
00:45:03.040 not that many solar
00:45:03.880 panels.
00:45:04.840 But then everybody
00:45:05.540 says, but, but,
00:45:07.120 but, but, but,
00:45:09.320 bauxite is
00:45:10.420 abundant, but
00:45:11.280 it's, there's a
00:45:12.840 lot of pollution
00:45:13.380 when you mine
00:45:13.960 it.
00:45:15.400 I'm told.
00:45:16.420 It's something I
00:45:17.020 learned five
00:45:17.460 minutes ago.
00:45:19.160 So, if it's
00:45:22.700 true that you
00:45:23.380 could have
00:45:24.080 abundant
00:45:24.500 materials and
00:45:25.640 create these
00:45:26.520 highly reliable,
00:45:28.660 cheap batteries
00:45:29.400 with non-rare
00:45:30.540 earth materials,
00:45:31.460 solar panels, and
00:45:32.680 it's one-sixth
00:45:33.480 the cost, everything
00:45:35.780 that Elon Musk
00:45:36.940 predicted is
00:45:38.040 true.
00:45:39.500 Meaning that
00:45:40.300 solar panels
00:45:41.040 really are the
00:45:41.740 future.
00:45:43.120 Now, remember,
00:45:44.340 Musk, even
00:45:45.380 recently, he's
00:45:46.820 pro-nuclear.
00:45:47.700 He tweeted just
00:45:48.340 the other day that
00:45:49.480 we should be
00:45:50.700 keeping our
00:45:51.160 nuclear plants
00:45:52.000 alive.
00:45:52.980 So, he knows
00:45:53.600 it's a, you
00:45:54.820 know, do
00:45:55.080 everything you
00:45:55.660 can situation.
00:45:56.500 It's not just
00:45:56.940 do the best
00:45:57.440 thing, whatever
00:45:58.500 the best thing
00:45:59.060 is.
00:45:59.300 So, I'm
00:46:03.400 not going to
00:46:03.840 tell you that
00:46:05.400 solar has no 0.99
00:46:06.580 problems, because
00:46:07.580 you've got the
00:46:08.060 waste problem.
00:46:08.980 It's a gigantic
00:46:09.520 problem.
00:46:11.340 But all the
00:46:12.440 pieces look like
00:46:13.360 they're coming
00:46:13.780 together.
00:46:14.620 When you
00:46:15.220 predict the
00:46:15.800 future of
00:46:16.240 solar power,
00:46:17.600 the thing you
00:46:18.200 don't predict
00:46:19.040 is a new
00:46:20.220 invention.
00:46:21.780 And this
00:46:22.140 might be in
00:46:23.160 that category
00:46:23.700 of something
00:46:24.100 you didn't
00:46:24.460 see coming.
00:46:25.140 A whole
00:46:25.780 gigantic
00:46:26.900 improvement in
00:46:27.940 battery
00:46:28.360 technology.
00:46:29.300 technology.
00:46:34.220 Rolls-Royce,
00:46:35.260 somebody is
00:46:35.900 saying in the
00:46:36.440 comments here,
00:46:37.380 Rolls-Royce is
00:46:38.140 bidding to sell
00:46:38.920 flat-pack small
00:46:40.240 modular reactors
00:46:41.360 to Japan.
00:46:42.740 And Japan is
00:46:43.440 very pro-nuclear
00:46:44.820 at the moment.
00:46:46.400 Yeah, I think
00:46:46.920 these small
00:46:47.620 modular nuclear
00:46:48.700 plants are
00:46:51.020 going to be
00:46:51.260 the way.
00:46:52.260 Plus solar,
00:46:53.180 plus batteries.
00:46:54.900 Well, there's
00:46:55.500 yet more
00:46:56.140 studies saying
00:46:57.140 that mushrooms
00:46:58.620 and psilocybin
00:46:59.940 can help you
00:47:01.260 with addiction.
00:47:02.280 So there's
00:47:02.740 a new study
00:47:03.260 that came out,
00:47:03.920 a big one I
00:47:04.420 guess,
00:47:05.140 and they
00:47:05.840 found that
00:47:06.400 just two
00:47:07.200 treatments with
00:47:08.300 psilocybin,
00:47:09.180 which is
00:47:09.580 mushrooms,
00:47:11.040 reduced drinking
00:47:13.580 for at least
00:47:14.240 eight months
00:47:15.120 after the first
00:47:15.760 treatments.
00:47:16.160 so it's the
00:47:17.500 results from
00:47:18.060 the largest
00:47:18.520 clinical trial
00:47:20.820 of its kind.
00:47:23.900 A hundred
00:47:24.640 percent of
00:47:25.540 all the
00:47:25.960 mushroom tests
00:47:27.080 have been,
00:47:28.680 at least as
00:47:29.480 far as I
00:47:29.880 know,
00:47:30.760 have been not
00:47:31.400 just positive,
00:47:32.940 but crazy
00:47:33.980 positive.
00:47:36.000 Now, just
00:47:36.860 think about
00:47:37.240 this.
00:47:38.200 We're on the
00:47:39.060 verge of
00:47:41.560 solving energy
00:47:43.440 because the
00:47:46.140 small nuclear
00:47:46.820 modules plus
00:47:47.800 these batteries
00:47:48.460 plus solar,
00:47:49.500 we're on the
00:47:50.180 verge of
00:47:50.540 actually just
00:47:51.040 solving energy.
00:47:52.580 Fusion's on
00:47:53.420 the way.
00:47:55.200 We're on the
00:47:56.120 verge of
00:47:56.660 solving
00:47:57.080 addiction
00:47:57.560 because I
00:47:59.160 think the
00:47:59.500 mushroom thing
00:48:00.180 is going to
00:48:00.660 be way bigger
00:48:01.280 than people
00:48:03.060 imagine.
00:48:04.960 That's huge.
00:48:07.220 That's huge.
00:48:07.880 And AI will
00:48:10.740 probably solve
00:48:11.680 a lot of
00:48:12.040 our other
00:48:12.380 problems.
00:48:14.760 By the way,
00:48:15.720 AI would
00:48:16.260 probably solve
00:48:18.180 nuclear as
00:48:18.840 well.
00:48:19.960 Because one
00:48:20.760 of the
00:48:21.180 problems with
00:48:22.140 the modern
00:48:23.060 reactors is
00:48:23.900 you have to
00:48:24.240 do a lot
00:48:24.560 of calculations
00:48:25.200 to keep
00:48:27.460 things stable
00:48:28.040 and AI can
00:48:29.560 do those
00:48:30.080 better than
00:48:30.960 we can.
00:48:33.020 Where are
00:48:33.760 Scott's
00:48:34.100 critical
00:48:34.500 thinking
00:48:34.900 skills?
00:48:36.260 Somebody
00:48:36.660 asks.
00:48:37.880 I've
00:48:41.380 noticed that
00:48:41.880 when people
00:48:42.400 question my
00:48:43.500 critical thinking
00:48:44.540 skills,
00:48:45.860 it's always
00:48:47.440 because they're
00:48:48.040 really bad at
00:48:49.060 critical thinking.
00:48:51.180 Almost never
00:48:52.280 does somebody
00:48:52.820 who has good
00:48:53.420 critical thinking
00:48:54.180 skills criticize
00:48:55.640 my critical
00:48:56.480 thinking skills.
00:48:57.920 It almost
00:48:58.520 never happens.
00:49:00.240 But people
00:49:00.700 who are not
00:49:01.220 good at it
00:49:01.760 are pretty sure
00:49:02.440 I'm not good
00:49:03.040 at it.
00:49:05.900 That's a
00:49:06.660 pattern I
00:49:07.240 notice.
00:49:07.880 So the
00:49:14.100 FBI or the
00:49:15.340 Department of
00:49:15.860 Justice, I
00:49:16.720 just treat them
00:49:17.220 all the same,
00:49:18.540 is saying that
00:49:19.520 in their
00:49:20.180 affidavit said
00:49:21.020 that there
00:49:21.360 was a
00:49:21.880 probable cause
00:49:23.460 to believe
00:49:23.920 the evidence
00:49:24.540 of obstruction
00:49:25.320 would be
00:49:25.780 discovered at
00:49:26.680 Mar-a-Lago.
00:49:28.340 Probable cause
00:49:29.540 to believe the
00:49:30.220 evidence of
00:49:30.980 obstruction
00:49:31.580 would be
00:49:32.180 discovered.
00:49:33.420 Now, this
00:49:34.840 raises an
00:49:35.440 interesting
00:49:35.780 question.
00:49:36.360 What would
00:49:36.700 be the
00:49:37.020 nature of
00:49:37.560 that evidence?
00:49:39.360 So we're
00:49:40.060 not talking
00:49:40.580 about interviewing
00:49:41.260 humans, so 1.00
00:49:42.820 it's not about
00:49:43.260 a human
00:49:43.660 source.
00:49:45.220 There's a
00:49:45.860 physical
00:49:46.560 evidence of
00:49:48.460 obstruction.
00:49:50.400 What do you
00:49:51.120 think that
00:49:51.420 would be?
00:49:52.920 What would
00:49:53.600 be physical
00:49:54.620 evidence of
00:49:55.480 obstruction?
00:49:55.900 obstruction?
00:49:57.100 Now, one
00:49:58.420 Democrat said,
00:49:59.240 well, it
00:49:59.580 would be
00:49:59.880 evidence that
00:50:00.800 he still had
00:50:02.440 documents that
00:50:03.500 he lied and
00:50:04.400 said he does
00:50:04.900 not have.
00:50:05.880 Do you think
00:50:06.260 that's what it
00:50:06.720 is?
00:50:07.420 Because if
00:50:08.220 that's what it
00:50:08.680 was, I feel
00:50:09.540 like they
00:50:09.840 would just
00:50:10.160 say that.
00:50:11.460 They would
00:50:11.780 say there's
00:50:12.340 evidence he
00:50:12.960 obstructed
00:50:13.640 justice by
00:50:15.080 retaining some
00:50:16.000 things he
00:50:16.460 said that he
00:50:17.060 gave to us.
00:50:18.480 Because it
00:50:19.060 would be really
00:50:19.500 easy to say
00:50:20.220 what that
00:50:21.400 obstruction
00:50:21.860 would look
00:50:22.420 like, right?
00:50:23.860 Because obstruction
00:50:24.540 of justice is
00:50:25.360 this gigantic
00:50:25.880 category that
00:50:27.540 could mean
00:50:27.880 anything.
00:50:28.800 But if it's
00:50:29.440 specifically that
00:50:31.160 he retained some
00:50:32.020 things that he
00:50:32.800 said he didn't
00:50:33.560 have or he
00:50:34.160 refused to get
00:50:34.860 back, well,
00:50:35.980 then the evidence
00:50:36.620 that those things
00:50:37.260 exist would be
00:50:38.460 evidence.
00:50:39.380 But do you need
00:50:40.000 that?
00:50:41.220 Because I thought
00:50:42.020 we had records
00:50:42.780 of everything
00:50:44.140 that's in those
00:50:44.740 boxes.
00:50:45.840 Did the GSA
00:50:46.600 not record
00:50:47.480 what's in the
00:50:48.000 boxes?
00:50:49.580 Because if we
00:50:50.420 have a record
00:50:50.900 of everything
00:50:51.380 that was in
00:50:51.840 the boxes,
00:50:53.160 and they know
00:50:54.060 what they got,
00:50:55.380 we should know
00:50:56.900 exactly what we
00:50:57.900 got and what's
00:50:58.640 in the boxes.
00:50:59.160 Do you need to
00:51:00.440 go back to
00:51:00.960 Mar-a-Lago
00:51:01.460 to look?
00:51:04.380 I don't know.
00:51:07.480 Maybe,
00:51:08.620 somebody suggested.
00:51:10.020 There was
00:51:10.300 evidence on
00:51:11.080 video,
00:51:12.300 security camp,
00:51:13.220 showing somebody
00:51:13.840 messing with the
00:51:14.880 secure documents.
00:51:17.420 Would that be
00:51:18.360 obstruction of
00:51:19.180 justice?
00:51:21.000 Well, it kind of
00:51:21.980 depended on what
00:51:22.500 they were doing,
00:51:23.100 wasn't it?
00:51:24.680 Do you think
00:51:25.360 anybody really
00:51:26.060 unlocked that
00:51:26.740 door?
00:51:28.180 I'm sure
00:51:28.740 everybody knew
00:51:29.280 there was
00:51:29.560 video security.
00:51:31.040 Do you think
00:51:31.440 that anybody
00:51:32.060 didn't know
00:51:32.680 there was
00:51:32.960 video security?
00:51:34.600 So somebody
00:51:35.160 unlocked that
00:51:35.840 door and
00:51:36.860 then did
00:51:37.420 something to,
00:51:38.340 I don't know,
00:51:39.160 what?
00:51:39.640 Do what?
00:51:41.020 Destroy it or
00:51:41.960 take it out?
00:51:44.120 I mean, I can't
00:51:44.620 even imagine
00:51:45.260 what the
00:51:46.580 obstruction would
00:51:47.260 look like.
00:51:47.780 Give us any
00:51:48.420 kind of hint.
00:51:49.000 did Trump
00:51:51.440 send a memo
00:51:52.280 out telling
00:51:53.060 everybody to
00:51:53.660 obstruct and
00:51:54.720 then he had
00:51:55.300 the memo
00:51:55.700 ordered to be
00:51:56.500 sealed inside
00:51:57.200 the boxes so
00:51:58.940 that they could
00:51:59.300 be found?
00:52:00.820 I mean, to
00:52:01.840 me, this is an
00:52:02.600 obvious lie.
00:52:04.520 To me, the
00:52:05.500 evidence of
00:52:06.220 obstruction looks
00:52:07.640 like a fishing
00:52:08.240 expedition, that
00:52:09.900 if you let us
00:52:10.620 go in there,
00:52:11.120 we'll find
00:52:11.520 something.
00:52:12.340 We'll find
00:52:13.020 something that
00:52:13.480 looks like
00:52:13.800 evidence.
00:52:14.980 Do you think
00:52:15.760 you would sign
00:52:16.420 a search warrant
00:52:18.000 for evidence
00:52:20.120 of obstruction
00:52:20.860 if it didn't
00:52:21.620 tell you a
00:52:22.080 little bit
00:52:22.420 about what
00:52:22.800 that evidence
00:52:23.360 might look
00:52:23.860 like?
00:52:25.060 Like, we
00:52:25.620 think we'll
00:52:26.040 find a
00:52:26.600 document with
00:52:27.600 evidence.
00:52:28.280 We think
00:52:28.920 we'll find a
00:52:29.600 laptop with
00:52:31.000 evidence.
00:52:32.020 Something.
00:52:33.560 But if you
00:52:33.960 just say you're
00:52:34.460 looking for
00:52:34.980 evidence of
00:52:35.600 obstruction,
00:52:37.180 what judge
00:52:38.020 signs that?
00:52:41.600 I mean, I
00:52:42.300 realize it's
00:52:42.860 easy to get
00:52:43.500 an indictment.
00:52:44.800 You know, you
00:52:45.120 can indict a
00:52:45.700 ham sandwich,
00:52:46.440 blah, blah, blah.
00:52:46.820 But really?
00:52:49.540 Would somebody
00:52:50.240 sign a document
00:52:51.000 with a generic
00:52:51.820 description of,
00:52:53.260 oh, it might
00:52:53.960 be some
00:52:54.320 obstruction of
00:52:55.060 justice, might
00:52:56.060 be some
00:52:56.360 evidence?
00:52:57.500 Maybe.
00:52:58.120 Maybe there's
00:52:58.800 evidence of a
00:52:59.400 murder.
00:52:59.960 We don't know.
00:53:01.060 But if we
00:53:01.440 don't look
00:53:01.760 around, you
00:53:02.300 never know.
00:53:03.280 Maybe there's
00:53:03.800 a serial killer.
00:53:05.500 We don't
00:53:05.840 know.
00:53:06.520 That's why
00:53:06.920 we're looking.
00:53:07.620 If we knew
00:53:08.460 there was a
00:53:08.980 serial killer,
00:53:09.680 we'd act
00:53:10.020 differently.
00:53:10.580 But we
00:53:10.940 don't know,
00:53:12.300 so we have
00:53:13.040 to go look.
00:53:13.540 Look, every
00:53:15.920 part of this
00:53:16.400 is fishy as
00:53:17.080 hell.
00:53:17.880 Every part of
00:53:18.400 it.
00:53:19.660 Yeah, why
00:53:20.040 did it take
00:53:20.380 eight hours?
00:53:22.000 Actually, I'm
00:53:22.620 not too
00:53:23.120 surprised that
00:53:23.800 it took
00:53:24.040 hours and
00:53:24.500 hours, because
00:53:25.880 just everything
00:53:27.080 is slower than
00:53:27.760 you think it
00:53:28.180 should be.
00:53:29.680 I think the
00:53:30.340 part that
00:53:30.680 bothers me
00:53:31.160 about this
00:53:31.680 looking for
00:53:32.780 the evidence
00:53:33.380 of obstruction
00:53:34.080 of justice
00:53:34.640 is that our
00:53:36.180 government doesn't
00:53:36.900 respect the
00:53:37.520 public enough
00:53:38.120 to lie to
00:53:39.120 us well.
00:53:39.700 it's one
00:53:41.440 thing to
00:53:41.840 lie to
00:53:42.220 us.
00:53:43.220 It's bad
00:53:43.680 enough.
00:53:44.680 That's really
00:53:45.140 bad.
00:53:46.240 You don't
00:53:46.520 want your
00:53:46.820 government
00:53:47.100 lying to
00:53:47.600 you.
00:53:48.320 But I
00:53:49.020 feel extra
00:53:49.900 insulted when
00:53:51.400 the lies are
00:53:52.220 not even
00:53:52.820 designed to
00:53:53.820 fool us.
00:53:55.780 Right?
00:53:56.940 This feels
00:53:57.380 like a
00:53:57.660 different level.
00:53:59.500 A lie
00:54:00.060 that's designed
00:54:00.780 to fool
00:54:01.340 you, you
00:54:02.840 don't like
00:54:03.700 it, but
00:54:05.020 you kind of
00:54:05.580 understand that's
00:54:06.360 the world you
00:54:06.860 live in.
00:54:07.920 But when they
00:54:08.780 lie to you in
00:54:09.440 a way that
00:54:09.680 you can tell
00:54:10.460 just by the
00:54:11.200 way they
00:54:11.580 word it that
00:54:12.320 it's not
00:54:12.700 true, I
00:54:13.980 don't even
00:54:14.360 have to do
00:54:14.820 research to
00:54:15.540 know this
00:54:15.900 isn't true.
00:54:17.100 Do I?
00:54:18.080 Do I need to
00:54:18.880 do my own
00:54:19.360 research to
00:54:20.220 know that
00:54:20.740 they think
00:54:22.560 there might
00:54:22.920 be evidence
00:54:23.480 of obstruction
00:54:24.140 is bullshit?
00:54:27.140 Now, I
00:54:27.760 could change
00:54:28.140 my mind,
00:54:28.840 by the way.
00:54:29.360 It would be
00:54:29.680 easy for me
00:54:30.200 to change my
00:54:30.780 mind on this.
00:54:31.900 So if we
00:54:32.540 find out
00:54:32.980 tomorrow that
00:54:34.000 there was
00:54:34.940 actually some
00:54:35.540 evidence of
00:54:36.080 obstruction and
00:54:37.000 it's exactly
00:54:37.600 what they were
00:54:38.060 looking for,
00:54:39.100 okay.
00:54:39.400 I'll change
00:54:40.240 my mind.
00:54:41.500 But the
00:54:42.360 fact that
00:54:42.760 they worded
00:54:43.380 it the way
00:54:43.800 they worded
00:54:44.340 it was such
00:54:46.000 lack of
00:54:47.580 clarity about
00:54:48.240 what it was
00:54:48.720 they were
00:54:48.920 looking at,
00:54:49.740 that really
00:54:50.520 just is a
00:54:52.000 blaring
00:54:52.700 confirmation that
00:54:54.260 this is
00:54:54.660 illegitimate to
00:54:56.300 me.
00:54:57.300 It looks like
00:54:57.800 they're saying
00:54:58.200 it right to
00:54:58.560 your face.
00:54:59.320 This is
00:54:59.800 illegitimate.
00:55:01.180 We're going
00:55:01.700 to do it
00:55:02.020 anyway.
00:55:03.260 That's what it
00:55:03.880 feels like.
00:55:04.920 It's not
00:55:05.380 legitimate.
00:55:06.040 We're not even
00:55:06.420 going to try
00:55:06.760 too hard to
00:55:07.240 lie to you about
00:55:07.800 it.
00:55:08.040 We're just
00:55:08.520 going to do
00:55:08.880 it anyway.
00:55:09.520 Because we
00:55:09.880 want to do
00:55:10.280 it.
00:55:10.580 That's why.
00:55:13.540 All right.
00:55:16.720 What do you
00:55:17.320 think about
00:55:17.740 this take on
00:55:18.520 Ukraine and
00:55:19.260 Russia? 0.61
00:55:21.420 That whatever
00:55:22.380 Russia gained 0.93
00:55:23.400 by control over
00:55:24.780 those territories
00:55:27.060 that it captured
00:55:28.460 from Ukraine,
00:55:29.680 whatever it
00:55:30.460 gained from
00:55:31.120 that will
00:55:32.740 never be as
00:55:33.540 big as what
00:55:34.120 they lost in
00:55:35.800 in terms of
00:55:36.440 energy control
00:55:37.400 over Europe.
00:55:39.080 So Putin's
00:55:39.840 influence over
00:55:41.080 Europe will
00:55:42.100 basically disappear
00:55:43.320 in about two
00:55:44.100 years because
00:55:45.500 they will find
00:55:46.120 replacement sources.
00:55:47.660 They won't allow
00:55:48.880 themselves in this
00:55:49.600 situation again.
00:55:51.400 So wouldn't you
00:55:52.100 say that Putin
00:55:52.940 lost in the
00:55:55.280 sense that his
00:55:55.980 long-term loss of
00:55:57.380 Europe as a
00:55:58.220 market and also
00:55:59.580 his political
00:56:00.300 control over Europe,
00:56:01.380 which is more
00:56:01.840 important probably,
00:56:02.940 don't you think
00:56:04.980 he lost more in
00:56:05.940 the long run
00:56:06.400 than he gained
00:56:07.020 with those
00:56:07.540 strategic places
00:56:09.580 that he controls?
00:56:12.360 What do you
00:56:12.960 think?
00:56:13.800 Did he gain more
00:56:14.900 or lose more?
00:56:15.980 If you're just
00:56:16.500 comparing the
00:56:17.500 strategic value of
00:56:19.480 Europe as your
00:56:20.160 energy market that
00:56:21.760 you're losing,
00:56:22.840 compare it to the
00:56:23.640 strategic value of
00:56:25.060 taking control of
00:56:26.140 that Crimea and
00:56:28.300 Donbass area.
00:56:29.060 So a lot of
00:56:32.700 people think he
00:56:33.260 gained more than
00:56:33.900 he lost.
00:56:37.280 To me it looks
00:56:39.000 like a loss.
00:56:41.420 So there are
00:56:42.320 more NATO
00:56:42.860 countries.
00:56:44.400 He has less
00:56:45.240 money, less
00:56:46.060 standing in the
00:56:46.780 world.
00:56:47.800 His technology
00:56:49.160 based industries
00:56:50.000 are going to be
00:56:50.440 decimated because
00:56:51.160 they can't get
00:56:51.640 ships.
00:56:52.960 He has lost his
00:56:53.840 biggest energy
00:56:54.600 deal, disinvited
00:56:57.480 to a variety of
00:56:58.760 international things
00:56:59.720 I assume.
00:57:00.340 That's going to
00:57:00.700 happen.
00:57:01.800 And all he got
00:57:02.600 for it was more
00:57:03.760 access to the
00:57:04.680 ocean.
00:57:07.200 That's it.
00:57:08.520 A little bit of
00:57:09.460 land that's good
00:57:10.300 economically.
00:57:11.380 But even the
00:57:12.060 stuff he took
00:57:12.600 over, it might
00:57:14.780 have been good
00:57:15.180 economically at
00:57:16.020 one point, but
00:57:17.400 if he has to
00:57:17.980 occupy it with a
00:57:18.940 standing army, it's
00:57:19.880 not really
00:57:20.240 economical anymore.
00:57:22.080 So I don't
00:57:22.640 believe he won on
00:57:23.720 economics with the
00:57:25.440 territory he took
00:57:26.660 over because it
00:57:27.640 will be too
00:57:27.960 expensive to
00:57:28.600 hold it.
00:57:31.120 To me, it
00:57:31.820 looks like loss.
00:57:35.480 Yeah, and if
00:57:36.300 he is doing more
00:57:36.920 business with
00:57:37.540 China, that 0.94
00:57:38.780 gives China 0.99
00:57:39.540 subtle control
00:57:41.740 over Russia.
00:57:43.000 So that looks
00:57:43.700 bad too.
00:57:48.920 Oh yeah, and
00:57:50.500 Russia's army has
00:57:51.580 been shown to be
00:57:52.420 weak.
00:57:53.140 And I think
00:57:54.140 the public is
00:57:56.540 going to start
00:57:56.980 noticing the
00:57:58.600 body bags at
00:57:59.320 some point in
00:57:59.880 Russia.
00:58:01.240 To me, I
00:58:01.960 think that my
00:58:02.460 prediction that
00:58:03.280 Ukraine would 0.96
00:58:04.340 win is one of
00:58:07.920 my best
00:58:08.280 predictions.
00:58:11.200 Because if
00:58:11.860 you're the
00:58:12.140 country that
00:58:12.640 got attacked,
00:58:14.300 winning means
00:58:15.200 surviving.
00:58:17.660 And it looks
00:58:18.380 like Ukraine will 1.00
00:58:19.140 survive with less
00:58:20.300 territory, but
00:58:21.000 they'll survive.
00:58:21.520 And if
00:58:23.600 Putin was
00:58:24.520 trying to gain
00:58:25.240 economics or
00:58:26.380 influence or
00:58:29.680 even legacy, I'm
00:58:33.060 not sure that he
00:58:33.840 got that.
00:58:35.820 It looks like he
00:58:36.800 might come out
00:58:37.300 behind.
00:58:39.380 But maybe the
00:58:40.420 legacy thing he can
00:58:41.360 control because he
00:58:42.080 controls the
00:58:42.780 information.
00:58:43.660 Wall Street Journal
00:58:50.860 said, if the
00:58:52.100 winter isn't too
00:58:52.940 cold, Germany's 0.98
00:58:53.800 economy will only
00:58:54.760 contract by 2.3%.
00:58:56.440 Do you think that
00:59:00.520 people are really at
00:59:01.600 risk of freezing to
00:59:02.420 death?
00:59:04.320 Because I have a
00:59:05.320 feeling that if the
00:59:07.380 poor actually
00:59:08.280 couldn't heat, they 0.71
00:59:10.680 would just go where
00:59:11.440 they could, right?
00:59:12.260 Would the poor
00:59:14.240 actually just stay in
00:59:15.180 their homes and
00:59:15.700 die?
00:59:16.980 Or would they, see,
00:59:18.260 the people who die 0.86
00:59:19.100 from freezing are the
00:59:21.040 poor who are sort of 0.72
00:59:24.000 in their own
00:59:24.420 situation.
00:59:25.840 It's usually people 0.98
00:59:26.880 who nobody knows
00:59:27.800 they're freezing to
00:59:28.460 death, and then they
00:59:29.760 do.
00:59:30.660 But if you knew that
00:59:31.840 all the poor people 0.98
00:59:32.600 didn't have power, and
00:59:34.900 they wouldn't know
00:59:35.420 that, wouldn't you
00:59:36.780 make sure that
00:59:37.360 everybody went to
00:59:38.060 all the poor people 0.98
00:59:38.800 and said, look, you're
00:59:39.620 not going to have any
00:59:40.140 power.
00:59:40.460 But if you come
00:59:41.940 down to this
00:59:42.460 government building,
00:59:44.220 you can sleep here
00:59:45.240 overnight until we
00:59:46.340 get power again, and
00:59:47.580 we'll have at least
00:59:48.140 electricity in this
00:59:49.040 government building.
00:59:50.520 I feel like it would
00:59:52.560 be a huge disruption
00:59:54.580 in normal behavior,
00:59:57.380 but they can keep
00:59:58.760 people warm.
01:00:01.080 Right?
01:00:01.840 I don't think people
01:00:02.720 are going to...
01:00:03.840 I think the ones that
01:00:04.820 will literally die from
01:00:06.140 the cold are the ones
01:00:07.660 that don't have any
01:00:08.260 family or connections.
01:00:09.700 Like, nobody knows
01:00:10.580 they're there.
01:00:11.760 But I think everybody
01:00:12.780 who asks for help will
01:00:14.120 just be taken to a
01:00:15.600 warm place.
01:00:18.240 Yeah.
01:00:19.260 So we'll see.
01:00:20.980 Yeah, for months.
01:00:22.120 For months.
01:00:22.920 Yeah.
01:00:23.480 If you had to.
01:00:24.600 Because, you know, look
01:00:25.340 at the pandemic.
01:00:26.600 We did a lot of things
01:00:27.480 in the pandemic that
01:00:28.740 you would imagine were
01:00:30.020 undoable, but you have
01:00:31.240 to do them in an
01:00:31.900 emergency.
01:00:32.280 We just had a pandemic
01:00:40.100 and the death rate
01:00:40.960 didn't really matter.
01:00:42.260 Okay?
01:00:42.780 I think it did matter.
01:00:51.660 Yeah, normal people
01:00:52.740 go where it's warm.
01:00:53.540 That's right.
01:00:57.700 Old people never die
01:00:58.900 from cold.
01:00:59.640 Right.
01:00:59.860 You know, somebody
01:01:02.080 has to teach
01:01:02.880 Democrats that 0.57
01:01:04.480 sarcasm is not
01:01:05.680 an argument.
01:01:09.240 Here's my typical
01:01:10.440 argument with a
01:01:12.140 Democrat.
01:01:13.160 I say,
01:01:14.520 the moon is up in
01:01:17.200 the sky.
01:01:18.680 And the Democrat
01:01:19.700 will say,
01:01:20.500 the moon is,
01:01:21.980 really,
01:01:22.780 the moon is up
01:01:23.780 in the sky.
01:01:24.320 Oh, this guy,
01:01:26.300 this guy,
01:01:27.320 everybody.
01:01:28.340 The Dilbert guy,
01:01:29.740 everybody,
01:01:30.380 the Dilbert guy,
01:01:31.260 you said,
01:01:32.060 the moon,
01:01:33.160 it's up in the sky.
01:01:36.640 Oh, stick to comics,
01:01:39.180 you 80s comic guy.
01:01:43.160 It's like half
01:01:43.920 of my discussions
01:01:44.720 are somebody
01:01:46.100 acting sarcastic
01:01:47.340 out of context.
01:01:50.100 Sarcasm works
01:01:51.140 when you have a point.
01:01:52.360 If you have
01:01:54.720 a good argument,
01:01:56.180 adding a little
01:01:57.340 sarcasm on top
01:01:58.380 of your argument,
01:01:59.700 that's good stuff.
01:02:01.460 That's exactly
01:02:02.380 where you want
01:02:02.920 your sarcasm to be.
01:02:04.840 Make your good
01:02:05.620 argument,
01:02:06.780 and then just
01:02:07.700 frost it
01:02:08.680 with a little
01:02:09.140 sarcasm.
01:02:10.180 That's good stuff.
01:02:11.680 Do you know what
01:02:12.120 is not good stuff?
01:02:13.900 No argument
01:02:14.700 whatsoever
01:02:15.280 with a restatement
01:02:17.820 of what you just
01:02:18.520 said,
01:02:19.100 but with a
01:02:19.920 sarcastic tone.
01:02:20.860 Trump was better
01:02:26.060 for immigration.
01:02:28.440 Okay.
01:02:29.840 All right.
01:02:30.520 Compared to Biden.
01:02:32.420 All right.
01:02:33.900 So Trump controlled
01:02:36.200 the border better
01:02:37.340 than Biden
01:02:37.920 is what you're saying.
01:02:38.720 All right, guy.
01:02:39.480 All right.
01:02:40.640 That's what the
01:02:41.420 cartoonist says.
01:02:42.700 That's what the
01:02:43.220 cartoonist says.
01:02:44.780 That's their whole
01:02:45.600 argument,
01:02:46.240 is attitude.
01:02:47.760 Have you ever
01:02:48.360 watched CNN
01:02:49.900 or MSNBC 0.85
01:02:50.860 to see how
01:02:51.460 they report
01:02:51.920 the news?
01:02:53.540 They report
01:02:54.380 the news,
01:02:55.040 but they make
01:02:55.840 a face.
01:02:58.460 So they'll
01:02:59.400 report ordinary
01:03:00.420 news,
01:03:01.260 but with a face
01:03:02.480 like there's
01:03:03.120 something terrible
01:03:03.760 going on.
01:03:05.760 It's like,
01:03:07.140 well,
01:03:07.800 President Trump
01:03:08.580 says he's
01:03:09.260 going to cut
01:03:09.940 taxes.
01:03:10.520 And then
01:03:20.220 that's the news.
01:03:21.740 The news
01:03:22.300 is a statement
01:03:22.980 of fact
01:03:23.500 followed by
01:03:24.760 lots of facial
01:03:25.820 so that you
01:03:29.000 think there's
01:03:29.440 something wrong
01:03:29.960 with the fact.
01:03:31.040 But if you only
01:03:31.900 listen to the fact,
01:03:32.780 you'd be like,
01:03:33.960 well,
01:03:34.220 that was just
01:03:34.920 like a fact.
01:03:36.840 What's the sarcasm
01:03:37.940 about?
01:03:41.400 All right.
01:03:45.200 That,
01:03:45.880 ladies and 0.98
01:03:46.260 gentlemen,
01:03:47.420 brings us to
01:03:48.420 the conclusion
01:03:49.120 of the exciting
01:03:50.160 content which I
01:03:51.180 prepared for you.
01:03:54.140 If you were
01:03:54.920 a member of
01:03:55.620 the locals
01:03:56.620 subscription
01:03:57.740 platform
01:03:58.460 in my
01:03:59.840 community,
01:04:00.580 you would be
01:04:01.300 seeing a
01:04:01.640 micro lesson
01:04:02.220 probably later
01:04:02.920 today on
01:04:03.680 how to
01:04:04.140 defeat your
01:04:05.100 social anxiety
01:04:06.860 using reframing.
01:04:08.740 Some hypnosis
01:04:09.520 tricks that
01:04:10.340 you could
01:04:10.540 try on
01:04:10.900 yourself.
01:04:12.860 And
01:04:13.280 so I'll
01:04:17.700 be fixing
01:04:18.220 everybody's
01:04:18.840 problems over
01:04:19.500 on the locals
01:04:20.160 platform.
01:04:22.360 And don't
01:04:23.120 you wish you
01:04:23.580 were there.
01:04:24.500 All right.
01:04:32.300 All right,
01:04:33.040 all right.
01:04:34.360 YouTube,
01:04:35.180 thanks for
01:04:35.640 joining.
01:04:35.880 It was a
01:04:36.920 great show,
01:04:37.560 wasn't it?
01:04:39.820 Bye for
01:04:40.380 now.
01:04:40.580 Thank you.