Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 30, 2022


Episode 1851 Scott Adams: Is Biden Destroying The World Right In Front Of Everyone? CNN Boycott?


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 33 minutes

Words per Minute

136.94084

Word Count

12,736

Sentence Count

1,000

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

44


Summary

The dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the dopamine hit that makes it all better, and it happens right now. Join me for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine sippin' hit, The Simultaneous Sip.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Oh, good morning everybody, and welcome to another highlight of civilization.
00:00:07.460 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I think if you scoured the entire planet,
00:00:12.220 all four corners of the circle, you would find nothing better than this.
00:00:17.980 Nothing, no.
00:00:19.380 Now, you think that the birth of your child was good?
00:00:21.900 That was nothing compared to what you're going to see this morning.
00:00:25.440 And if you'd like to take it up to another level, I'm talking better than twins,
00:00:30.000 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tanker gel,
00:00:33.800 so it's not a canteen jug or flask or a vessel of any kind.
00:00:37.480 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:41.100 I like coffee.
00:00:42.980 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:47.960 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:50.760 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now.
00:00:54.100 Go.
00:00:54.440 Oh, yeah.
00:01:01.940 Oh, that was good.
00:01:04.680 Yeah, whoa, that was good.
00:01:07.040 Wow.
00:01:08.320 I feel I'm growing muscles.
00:01:10.640 I'm not even working out.
00:01:12.380 That's how good that coffee was.
00:01:13.880 Well, did you ever wonder what it was worth to not be a hypocrite?
00:01:20.620 Did you ever wonder the economic value of being consistent in your opinion?
00:01:26.060 Well, I've learned the actual economic value of that.
00:01:29.940 $20.
00:01:31.100 I won $20 yesterday for being consistent in my opinion.
00:01:37.300 I know.
00:01:37.920 I know.
00:01:38.520 Pat on the back.
00:01:39.700 Here's what happened.
00:01:40.620 But I was on Twitter, as I often am, and must have said something about those Mar-a-Lago
00:01:49.560 documents not being terribly important to anything.
00:01:55.000 To me, the whole Mar-a-Lago thing looks like fake news.
00:01:59.500 Once we boil it down to what was happening, it's going to be sort of about documents.
00:02:05.660 I just don't feel it's ever going to be important.
00:02:11.380 We're just going to treat it like it's important until we finally all just give up and say, yeah,
00:02:16.040 that really was nothing.
00:02:18.040 So I must have said something that trivialized the Mar-a-Lago stuff.
00:02:22.460 And then I got tweeted at by a Twitter user, JC Adolfson.
00:02:28.020 And he said, and he said to me, he said to me, I bet $20 if I scrolled back five years,
00:02:36.800 I would find tweets about emails and how, talking about Hillary Clinton, I would find tweets about
00:02:44.260 emails and how she should be in prison for mishandling classified documents.
00:02:48.140 That's right.
00:02:51.080 JC Adolfson thinks if he goes back through my Twitter account, he's going to find an inconsistency
00:02:57.240 where I thought Hillary Clinton should be locked up, but I think Trump should be just allowed
00:03:02.800 to do whatever he wants with documents.
00:03:04.360 That's what JC said.
00:03:06.160 He was going to bet $20 that I had an inconsistent opinion.
00:03:12.240 To which I said, bet accepted.
00:03:15.220 Because I said her emails were trivial.
00:03:18.140 How many of you were angry at me at the time when I kept saying that Hillary's emails
00:03:22.520 were no big deal and she shouldn't go to jail for that?
00:03:27.100 See what happened?
00:03:29.600 A few years pass.
00:03:32.200 And I'm just about the only person who can tell you that the Mar-a-Lago documents are not
00:03:37.720 important because who is the only consistent person in the entire world?
00:03:42.040 Me.
00:03:43.520 Me.
00:03:44.480 I know you're still mad at me.
00:03:45.600 Somebody says they're still mad at me.
00:03:48.980 But whether you think that both of them are important or neither of them, or if you want
00:03:54.300 to make the argument, Scott, these are completely different situations.
00:03:58.640 I know they're different situations.
00:04:02.020 I know.
00:04:03.020 I get that.
00:04:04.440 I get that one of them could be bad and one of them could be good in a theoretical sense.
00:04:09.700 But I believe that both of them are in the category of paperwork.
00:04:14.100 And while I get that there have to be laws about handling of secure stuff, I get that.
00:04:22.540 And I get that laws were broken.
00:04:24.740 And I get that nobody's above the law.
00:04:27.600 But I also like my own self-interest.
00:04:32.180 And my self-interest is that we don't have leaders in the country locking each other up.
00:04:36.720 The winner doesn't get to lock up the loser.
00:04:41.120 I'm not going to live in that country.
00:04:43.740 Seriously.
00:04:45.140 If the loser starts getting locked up, I'm fucking out of here.
00:04:50.480 I'm out of that country.
00:04:52.340 So no.
00:04:53.860 Do I care if Hillary broke some laws with her emails?
00:04:57.780 Not really.
00:04:59.340 Not really.
00:05:01.040 Because it was probably technical laws.
00:05:03.960 Now, what she was doing might have been important to me.
00:05:06.720 Like, what she was actually transacting might have mattered.
00:05:09.160 But I don't know what that is.
00:05:10.680 But do I care that her email was unsecure?
00:05:13.780 A little bit.
00:05:15.400 Not enough she should go to jail for it.
00:05:18.520 Do I care that Trump may or may not be mishandling some documents?
00:05:24.220 Yeah, a little bit.
00:05:25.520 A little bit.
00:05:26.820 Do I think he should go to jail for it?
00:05:29.000 No.
00:05:30.040 I mean, I don't know what the real situation is.
00:05:32.240 Maybe someday we'll find out.
00:05:33.840 But we shouldn't be sending our leaders to jail for stuff this small.
00:05:39.460 This small.
00:05:41.760 Let me go further.
00:05:44.020 I think our leaders should be above the law.
00:05:47.240 There, I said it.
00:05:48.780 Because I don't want somebody coming in and saying,
00:05:50.740 Scott, why do you think some people should be above the law?
00:05:54.360 No, I do think some people should be above the law.
00:05:58.380 These smaller laws.
00:06:00.480 The smaller ones.
00:06:01.300 Do you think the president should go to jail for littering?
00:06:06.020 Well, you don't go to jail for littering.
00:06:07.760 But you know what I mean, right?
00:06:09.480 It's simply not in the best interest of citizens
00:06:12.800 that we're using the legal system to beat up our leaders.
00:06:17.040 We should not give them that weapon.
00:06:19.720 We should disarm our leaders so that they're not fighting about bullshit.
00:06:26.420 Let them take care of global stuff.
00:06:30.340 Let them take care of the economy and immigration and supply chains.
00:06:35.140 Go work on that stuff.
00:06:36.160 But if you want to put any of them in jail for their emails or their paperwork,
00:06:43.340 nah, I'm not on board with that.
00:06:45.620 I'd let both sides get away with that stuff, unfortunately.
00:06:48.680 I mean, you should discourage it.
00:06:50.260 Maybe after they're out of office, you do something about it.
00:06:53.840 That would be different.
00:06:55.560 But Nixon?
00:06:59.200 I don't know.
00:07:00.060 Well, I think breaking and entering is not exactly a small crime.
00:07:07.040 I think breaking and entering is a different level.
00:07:13.060 All right.
00:07:15.760 It turns out that young people are being more pro-nuclear than maybe ever, as far as I know.
00:07:22.960 So what do you think has caused young people to become the most pro-nuclear they've been?
00:07:30.600 They're not pro-nuclear by a huge majority.
00:07:34.040 It's just compared to where they used to be.
00:07:36.120 There's a very dramatic movement.
00:07:37.900 What do you think it is?
00:07:39.800 What do you think caused youth to be pro-nuclear?
00:07:43.600 You know, I'd love to tell you that it's adults doing, you know, maybe some education.
00:07:50.000 I'd love to tell you it's Michael Schellenberger, because he's, you know, a superstar in that.
00:07:55.500 I'd love to tell you it's Mark Schneider, another superstar of, you know, nuclear, let's say, education for the public.
00:08:06.160 And I'd love to tell you that I'd helped in some way, because I like boosting both of those people.
00:08:12.080 But I don't think young people are paying attention to any of us.
00:08:16.220 Do you?
00:08:16.600 I can't imagine anybody under 20 could name any of those three people or has seen any of our tweets.
00:08:27.320 So whatever is happening, whatever is happening, I think is happening on its own.
00:08:34.980 I think with adults and maybe with leaders, we move the needle, you know, collectively.
00:08:40.220 But I think, here's my theory on the young.
00:08:45.940 You ready for it?
00:08:47.820 The young disagree with whatever is the, you know, the mainstream opinion.
00:08:55.000 So I feel like it has more to do with the fact that adults say nuclear is scary.
00:09:04.100 If all the adults that said nuclear was safe, maybe the young would be on the other side of that.
00:09:12.660 So there's a little bit, there's a little bit automatic about young people disagreeing with the status quo.
00:09:19.100 I feel like there's a little bit of automatic in there.
00:09:22.880 Now, secondly, it could be that they've, some of them, have figured out there's no other way to save the planet if they think the planet is going to, you know, go up in flames.
00:09:33.080 So it could be some of them said, okay, whatever, whatever risk is involved, it can't be as bad as the whole planet going up.
00:09:41.520 Could be that.
00:09:42.660 But it's an unknown.
00:09:45.140 I just read an article on it where the article said nobody knows why that's changing.
00:09:51.060 Well, Dr. Drew has been blocked on YouTube again.
00:09:55.520 Apparently he was planning to live stream a Dr. Robert Malone interview.
00:10:00.020 Dr. Robert Malone, as you know, is a rogue doctor, a rogue doctor, meaning that he has some non-traditional views on the dangers of the vaccines and some other pandemic-related topics.
00:10:17.440 And so we now live in a world where a doctor can't talk to a doctor in front of you.
00:10:25.260 That's real.
00:10:26.120 Now, if you told me that YouTube had blocked, let's say, Joe Rogan from talking to Robert Malone or Tim Poole or name whoever you want to name as a famous blogger,
00:10:40.980 I would say to myself, okay, maybe I don't agree with that, but at least I see what they're trying to do, right?
00:10:48.980 What they're trying to do is make sure that you don't have a doctor fooling some non-doctor with a bunch of bullshit and then the viewers can't tell that the doctor is full of shit, right?
00:11:02.340 But that's not really the same as a doctor talking to a doctor.
00:11:08.100 That's got to be different, all right?
00:11:10.700 If you have two doctors talking on a topic on which both of them have been quite immersed for a long time, that has to be something the public can see.
00:11:23.880 So YouTube, if you're listening to me and any of you have anything to do with who gets banned on the Dr. Drew channels, you need to make an exception for a doctor-on-doctor conversation.
00:11:35.460 I believe you should also let all of the other conversations in under free speech, blah, blah, blah.
00:11:42.660 But if you're stopping a doctor from talking to a doctor about the most relevant medical question of our time, you've really gone off the rails.
00:11:54.400 There's no way I can possibly support that, not even a little bit.
00:11:59.440 So I would say to YouTube, just keep in mind, this is doctor-on-doctor talking.
00:12:04.420 If you're blocking that, you've gone completely into a territory that has no backing at all, right?
00:12:12.760 No backing at all.
00:12:17.240 You've been off the rails since they fired James Damore.
00:12:22.520 Oh, they've been off the rails, not me.
00:12:25.480 All right.
00:12:27.680 So we'll see what happens there.
00:12:29.220 The funniest story of the day is there's a trending hashtag on Twitter to boycott CNN.
00:12:39.320 Do you know why there's a move by CNN's own viewers to boycott CNN?
00:12:49.760 Yeah.
00:12:51.080 All right.
00:12:51.960 So let's just go through all the ways this is funny.
00:12:54.840 Number one, they want to stage a boycott for a product that nobody wants already.
00:13:05.540 CNN's ratings are so low that I don't know if you'd even notice a boycott.
00:13:10.220 Would anybody even notice?
00:13:12.640 All right.
00:13:12.940 So that's the first funny thing, is that they're talking about boycotting something that has almost no audience.
00:13:19.200 I'm exaggerating a little bit, but it's a small audience compared to a lot of things on television.
00:13:26.800 The next thing is that you have to go follow the hashtag.
00:13:35.600 So go to Twitter if you have a Twitter account and follow the boycott CNN hashtag.
00:13:39.420 And you have to see the comments from the angry audience that is being abandoned by them because they're making a move toward not being biased.
00:13:52.460 That's what CNN's doing.
00:13:55.000 So CNN has dared to say out loud that they don't want to publish biased news anymore.
00:14:01.760 They want to do something that's more realistic and close to the middle.
00:14:05.120 They're saying out loud, as specifically as they can, we want to be more fair and accurate in our news.
00:14:13.760 And what did their audience say?
00:14:15.980 Their audience said, no, no, we don't want that fair and accurate stuff down the middle.
00:14:22.580 We don't want that.
00:14:24.660 Now, how funny is it that they're literally boycotting fairness and accuracy?
00:14:32.640 And that their audience was apparently always in on the joke.
00:14:39.700 And the joke was that CNN wasn't trying to do real news.
00:14:43.560 That's how I hear it.
00:14:45.020 I hear that their audience understood that they weren't a real news organization.
00:14:51.740 It was about team building or something.
00:14:54.420 And that they liked that.
00:14:55.700 They liked the team building.
00:14:56.880 They liked the team play element of it.
00:14:59.620 And as soon as they said they were going to be real news, and they allowed on some Republicans, I guess, this week.
00:15:06.600 Well, I say allowed on.
00:15:07.920 I'm sure they were always invited, but for whatever reason, they're going on now.
00:15:11.700 And so they're watching their own audience go nuts because the audience might be exposed to real news for the first time.
00:15:20.000 And so they're watching their own audience.
00:15:21.000 It's very funny.
00:15:22.000 All right.
00:15:23.140 It's very funny.
00:15:23.940 There's not much you can say about it.
00:15:25.340 You just describe it.
00:15:27.160 And then it's just funny.
00:15:29.480 All right.
00:15:34.140 So here's an example.
00:15:36.300 So this is a story on CNN's website.
00:15:39.180 And you tell me if you would have seen this story a year ago.
00:15:46.140 Because I think this is an example of CNN trying to actually find a reasonable center.
00:15:51.580 Now, by the way, if they continue on this path, CNN does, of looking for the center, I think I'm going to be on their side.
00:16:00.260 But I think I'm going to help them, like, you know, talk them up a little bit.
00:16:05.940 Because I don't think it's going to work.
00:16:08.620 I think financially they're going to go down in flames because I don't know that their audience wants real news.
00:16:15.180 And I don't know that, you know, Fox viewers are going to tune in.
00:16:18.920 So I don't think their strategy is a good one.
00:16:21.820 But I do support it for the benefit of the world.
00:16:24.780 So for the benefit of the world, you know, maybe I'll give them a little boost.
00:16:29.000 But we'll see what they can do.
00:16:31.000 But here's an example.
00:16:32.640 You tell me if you think this story would have been on CNN a major story.
00:16:37.060 All right.
00:16:37.220 This is not small.
00:16:38.060 This is a major story on CNN.
00:16:40.380 And it says there's a big change in who's coming to the U.S.-Mexico border.
00:16:45.160 A large number of migrants from Mexico and the Northern Triangle are still making the journey.
00:16:51.080 But the number of migrants from other countries represented in the ratio graph has hugely increased.
00:16:57.480 So it's a story about the border situation worsening.
00:17:03.100 And it's worse in a way that clearly is some exposure to, you know, terrorism and risk.
00:17:10.140 Because the people coming across the border are no longer just Central America and Mexico.
00:17:14.860 They're from everywhere.
00:17:17.260 Right.
00:17:17.860 Yeah.
00:17:18.120 We've got Cubans and everything else.
00:17:19.860 So do you think the CNN would have told a story about the Mexican border crisis is not only bad, but it's worse than you think?
00:17:31.800 It's actually a story about the border situation being worse than you thought.
00:17:37.420 That's new, right?
00:17:39.420 Can't you already see the editorial change?
00:17:41.420 To me, it looks like there's a shift.
00:17:48.460 Now, I saw some people attacking Jake Tapper for having some Republicans on the program and not pushing back hard enough.
00:17:59.520 Well, I'm going to, you know, I'm going to support Jake Tapper here.
00:18:04.820 If he had Republicans on, that's a big step in the right direction.
00:18:10.840 And I'm sure he's invited them on before.
00:18:14.080 I just don't know why it's happening now and didn't happen before.
00:18:17.540 But how much pushback do you really expect on a, you know, like a four-minute hit?
00:18:23.180 There's just not a lot of pushback you can do.
00:18:25.520 So I don't know if you push back enough or not.
00:18:27.560 But, you know, there's a limit to how much you can push back in four minutes.
00:18:30.720 Here's a question for you.
00:18:36.100 How many ways could Trump win the presidency back?
00:18:41.640 I feel like there are lots of ways for him to do it.
00:18:44.740 But I don't think he's necessarily going to take the way that would be easiest.
00:18:49.780 Now, these are mostly just funny.
00:18:52.560 Here's one way Trump could win the presidency.
00:18:56.240 Never talk in public while he's running for public.
00:19:00.120 While he's running for president.
00:19:01.900 Just not.
00:19:03.580 Don't do any interviews.
00:19:05.600 Just don't do any.
00:19:07.060 Just do the Biden, Biden strategy and actually tell the world he's doing it.
00:19:12.540 Just say, you know, you know exactly what I'll do because you watched it before.
00:19:16.860 I'm going to do more of that.
00:19:18.120 If you want more of that, I'm your person.
00:19:23.520 But you don't need me to describe it because you know what it is.
00:19:26.080 You know what you're getting.
00:19:27.600 So you know what you're getting.
00:19:28.880 So I'm not going to say anything that will cause any fake news to come after me, taking things out of context.
00:19:35.180 You know exactly what you're getting.
00:19:37.360 I'll be here.
00:19:38.620 Let me know.
00:19:39.160 Now, the news would go crazy because they wouldn't have, you know, Trump to entertain them.
00:19:44.900 And there's no way that Trump would do this, by the way.
00:19:47.200 I think that's so counter to everything in his personality that there's no chance it would happen.
00:19:52.520 But would it work?
00:19:54.620 Would it work?
00:19:55.340 I think the only thing that could keep Trump from winning is something Trump said.
00:20:02.420 So if he doesn't say something, you know, that they can take out of context, it probably just waltzes right into the office.
00:20:11.300 All right.
00:20:11.540 Here's another one.
00:20:13.440 You know how Trump was good at grabbing the gun from the opponent and turning it around.
00:20:18.580 So, you know, he turned fake news into a weapon against him when it was initially used against him.
00:20:27.460 Here's one he could turn around.
00:20:29.440 Imagine instead of make America great again, Trump ran on an anti-fascism platform.
00:20:36.240 Anti-fascism platform.
00:20:39.060 And just made everything about that.
00:20:41.420 Say, fascism is when the government tries to control industry and takes your rights away.
00:20:45.960 Here are all the ways the Democrats are controlling industry.
00:20:50.020 We're trying to with their regulations and their taxes and their ESG.
00:20:54.220 And here are all the ways the Republicans are trying to keep you free.
00:20:59.480 Now, what would happen if he ran on an anti-fascism platform?
00:21:05.560 What would the Democrats say?
00:21:07.260 They'd say, no, you're the fascist.
00:21:10.760 Republicans are the fascist, right?
00:21:14.480 That's what they say.
00:21:15.480 Now, that would be predictable.
00:21:17.700 Now, what would happen next?
00:21:20.280 You know what would happen next?
00:21:22.100 You'd have to talk about what a fucking fascist is.
00:21:25.440 You couldn't avoid it.
00:21:27.060 If he made it his platform, you'd have to talk about it every day.
00:21:31.560 And if you talked about it every day, what would you learn?
00:21:34.460 Who's more fascist?
00:21:36.040 The people who are putting restrictions on you or the ones who are taking them off you.
00:21:42.260 Now, the glaring exception is abortion.
00:21:44.740 The left is going to say, no, you fascists are taking away our right of abortion, which is true in a way.
00:21:52.800 But at the same time, that's a special case, right?
00:21:57.120 Because, you know, the Republicans are saying, we're stopping murder.
00:22:03.500 You know, that's not exactly what motivates fascists.
00:22:07.740 Fascists are not motivated by stopping murder as they see it, right?
00:22:12.180 That's not my opinion.
00:22:13.260 That's the opinion of people.
00:22:15.420 So I think you could easily carve out the abortion one and say, no, no, no, that's about people's genuine...
00:22:26.080 Here's the way I'd say it.
00:22:27.580 If I were arguing against abortion, I would give the other side the complete respect that they deserve.
00:22:39.700 And I think they deserve more respect than you do, perhaps.
00:22:43.340 I would actually make their argument for them.
00:22:46.760 I'd say, here's what they say.
00:22:48.620 And I've got to admit, there's something to that.
00:22:51.860 But on the other side, you know, my team, if this is your team...
00:22:57.700 So one could say, my team believes that this is murder and that all life is sacred and we're going to push that.
00:23:05.060 I think you could make that message really easily.
00:23:08.180 But I think you have to respect the other side and say, I understand why somebody would want this right.
00:23:16.180 I understand why somebody would do it.
00:23:18.620 You know, times are tough.
00:23:19.880 Things are desperate.
00:23:21.600 People have different opinions about what is right, what is wrong.
00:23:24.220 I get that.
00:23:24.820 But we're on the side of life is sacred, and I think you'll appreciate that in the long run.
00:23:33.220 So I think you could easily make an anti-fascism argument and not worry about the abortion part.
00:23:39.820 You could argue that away pretty easily.
00:23:42.040 But you have to give some respect to the other team to make a good argument.
00:23:47.740 Nobody accepts an argument where you only say your side.
00:23:52.240 Nobody.
00:23:52.640 Because if you only say your side of the argument, and you don't acknowledge there's some point to the other side,
00:23:59.080 everybody just says, oh, a partisan.
00:24:00.780 They're not even trying.
00:24:03.260 All right.
00:24:03.800 You've got to show the other side.
00:24:06.860 All right.
00:24:08.260 Here's another way that Trump could win.
00:24:11.020 This would be his slogan.
00:24:13.040 You ready for this?
00:24:13.800 This one's going to, this one will just stop you in your tracks.
00:24:19.460 This would be a Trump slogan that would guarantee his election.
00:24:25.220 Make Europe warm again.
00:24:29.320 Make Europe warm again.
00:24:31.680 He could just put out the bumper sticker and then go back in the basement.
00:24:46.240 He would never have to do an interview again.
00:24:49.260 Make Europe warm again.
00:24:50.980 There's nothing else you have to add to that argument.
00:24:56.680 Am I right?
00:24:57.400 The entire argument is in four words.
00:25:03.680 There's nothing else you have to add to that.
00:25:06.660 That Biden was such a disaster that Europe is going to freeze and starve, at least to some degree.
00:25:14.660 And, you know, it might be even worse, not might, it's going to be even worse in the, you know, in the Bangladesh type places.
00:25:24.180 There's, you could just be done.
00:25:27.020 Make Europe warm again and walk away.
00:25:31.860 Because if you don't want Europe to be warm again, you're not really America, are you?
00:25:37.760 Because here's my, here's my take on this.
00:25:40.260 A lot of these questions are about what you want to do.
00:25:42.980 Like, what's the best path?
00:25:45.600 This isn't one of them.
00:25:47.920 It isn't one of them.
00:25:50.580 What is this?
00:25:52.340 The question of whether we're, you know, stepping up to help Europe enough,
00:25:56.940 is that a question about the best strategy?
00:26:00.500 It isn't.
00:26:02.260 Is it about the best path?
00:26:04.460 Is it about who's predicting what?
00:26:06.480 Is it about follow the money?
00:26:08.560 No.
00:26:09.740 It's not any of that.
00:26:11.020 It's about one fucking thing.
00:26:16.040 Who is America?
00:26:19.120 This is a, this is an identity question.
00:26:22.920 Who are we?
00:26:24.840 Because we're a little bit confused right now, aren't we?
00:26:27.760 Like, America's not quite sure who it is.
00:26:30.480 We're sort of in a little transitionary period.
00:26:32.920 We're a little, you know, at each other's throats at the moment.
00:26:38.360 But if we stand here and watch Europe starve and freeze,
00:26:44.960 whatever we are is not what we used to be.
00:26:50.060 Who would agree with me on that?
00:26:51.800 If we let this happen the way it looks like it's going to happen,
00:26:55.540 I don't see anything that would change it.
00:26:59.120 But can we say that we're great?
00:27:01.200 I don't think so.
00:27:03.220 Like, I'm so pro-American, it's disgusting.
00:27:06.520 But if we let this happen, we're not great.
00:27:09.380 We're not great.
00:27:10.840 Let's just stop pretending.
00:27:13.080 You know, maybe it should be, make America adequate again.
00:27:17.000 Make America not suck again.
00:27:19.620 Like, we're so far from greatness if we can't solve this problem.
00:27:23.700 Because here's the problem.
00:27:24.940 It's a solvable problem.
00:27:26.880 If it were unsolvable, or if we had done everything we could,
00:27:33.100 I'd say, well, you've done everything you could.
00:27:36.960 But I'm not happy rebranding America to pathetic assholes.
00:27:44.040 Right?
00:27:44.100 There are enough people who think that about America already.
00:27:47.120 But we don't have to brand ourselves pathetic assholes.
00:27:51.800 And that's what we're doing.
00:27:54.280 You know, it's bad enough if somebody else has a bad opinion about your country.
00:27:57.940 But we're doing this to ourselves.
00:28:00.120 We're making a conscious, considered,
00:28:03.940 we've got plenty of time, like nobody's rushed.
00:28:07.700 And we've decided that what America wants to be,
00:28:12.700 at least if we continue on this path,
00:28:15.000 is we want to be a bunch of useless assholes.
00:28:21.200 That's like an actual decision.
00:28:24.020 You know, in effect, it's a decision.
00:28:26.660 I'll tell you who I'd like to be.
00:28:28.920 Here's who I would like to be.
00:28:30.400 I'd like to be somebody who pulled out all the stops to help Europe.
00:28:36.160 That's who I'd like to be.
00:28:37.240 And if we don't have an administration that can help me be who I want to be,
00:28:43.900 I can't really support that.
00:28:47.000 Can't support that at all.
00:28:49.880 Yeah, act like an ally.
00:28:52.020 And let me say this.
00:28:53.060 If we let Europe starve and freeze,
00:28:56.900 don't ask them for help if we ever need any.
00:29:01.980 If the United States ever needs some help,
00:29:04.880 I wouldn't ask Europe.
00:29:07.560 Because if they say no, I'd say,
00:29:09.240 okay, I get that.
00:29:10.460 Yeah, I get that.
00:29:12.140 So we're going to throw away 200 years of
00:29:15.840 insanely important history
00:29:18.860 where if you need help, we're going to be there.
00:29:22.320 We're going to throw that out the fucking window.
00:29:25.920 That's like the most valuable thing the country has.
00:29:28.920 What does America have that's more valuable than its allies?
00:29:35.360 Not much.
00:29:37.740 Right.
00:29:40.040 Did you know that Elon Musk said he was going to give up
00:29:43.540 all his major physical possessions?
00:29:46.160 So I guess he got rid of all his real estate.
00:29:47.940 He doesn't own a house.
00:29:48.860 I'm guessing he doesn't own a car.
00:29:53.820 Which is funny.
00:29:55.240 Because he owns a car company.
00:29:58.340 But I'll bet he doesn't own a car.
00:30:00.300 Probably just has one that the company owns
00:30:02.240 or he drives or something.
00:30:03.640 Or somebody drives them.
00:30:04.780 He probably doesn't drive too much.
00:30:07.320 And do you remember a lot of you were worried
00:30:09.960 because it was a Klaus Schwab
00:30:11.440 or somebody predicted about the future
00:30:14.100 that you will own nothing and love it?
00:30:15.960 But you'll own nothing and love it.
00:30:18.180 And then people interpreted that as socialism.
00:30:22.520 And when I heard it, I thought,
00:30:23.880 no, no, no.
00:30:25.840 Owning things is a gigantic headache.
00:30:29.420 Now, if you're not in this situation,
00:30:32.180 you may not have experienced this,
00:30:33.740 but I'm sort of in the...
00:30:35.520 Not sort of.
00:30:36.580 I'm in a situation
00:30:37.680 where I could own more than one home
00:30:40.260 if I wanted to.
00:30:43.840 Do you know how much trouble
00:30:45.240 owning one home is?
00:30:47.560 Oh, my God.
00:30:49.060 It's like a full-time job.
00:30:51.200 Owning two homes would just double my work
00:30:53.280 and I could go stay at a hotel
00:30:55.240 if I want to travel.
00:30:57.200 Owning possessions
00:30:58.060 is just a burden.
00:31:02.040 Do you know why I like going on vacation?
00:31:05.020 Does anybody know why I like going on vacation?
00:31:07.780 To get away from my possessions.
00:31:11.120 True story.
00:31:12.660 When I go on vacation,
00:31:14.660 it's not because I like the destination,
00:31:17.280 although I often like the destination.
00:31:19.280 It's because I have to escape my possessions.
00:31:22.500 They're too needy.
00:31:24.440 And my dog.
00:31:25.420 I have to get away from my dog.
00:31:28.500 My dog is a continuous burden on my life.
00:31:31.000 I love her madly.
00:31:32.460 You know, when she passes,
00:31:33.700 I'll be destroyed.
00:31:36.400 But nonetheless,
00:31:38.760 she lowers the quality of my life
00:31:40.960 by 40%, at least.
00:31:44.200 I mean, it's just terrible
00:31:45.280 living in a house with a dog
00:31:46.520 if you're the only one.
00:31:47.680 If you have other people in the house,
00:31:49.020 they can, you know,
00:31:50.020 take some of the dog energy.
00:31:52.060 But if there's only one person
00:31:53.220 in the house with a dog,
00:31:54.240 it's just the shits.
00:31:57.600 It really is terrible
00:31:58.800 to live with a dog.
00:32:00.560 And I love my dog.
00:32:02.680 I love her.
00:32:04.520 You just can't live and work
00:32:06.120 in a house that has a dog.
00:32:07.600 Because the trouble is,
00:32:08.580 I have too much empathy.
00:32:10.620 I don't know what your dog looks like,
00:32:13.360 but every time I want to do something,
00:32:15.780 my dog runs over and does this.
00:32:18.920 Are you going to do something
00:32:20.020 for me right now?
00:32:21.120 Are we going outside?
00:32:22.120 Are we going outside?
00:32:22.840 No?
00:32:23.760 Oh.
00:32:25.080 Oh.
00:32:26.680 Oh.
00:32:28.320 Oh.
00:32:30.040 Oh.
00:32:31.520 Oh.
00:32:32.400 We're not going outside right now?
00:32:34.680 Because I really, really want
00:32:36.080 to go outside right now.
00:32:37.500 Not in five minutes.
00:32:38.380 Right now.
00:32:40.940 That's my dog
00:32:42.120 every minute of my life.
00:32:44.420 She either needs a treat
00:32:46.080 right now,
00:32:47.480 or she's got to go
00:32:49.240 through a doorway
00:32:49.980 or someplace else
00:32:51.300 right now.
00:32:53.400 And she can't wait.
00:32:55.440 So every minute of my day,
00:32:56.860 I'm disappointing my dog
00:32:58.240 who I love more than,
00:32:59.820 you know,
00:33:00.660 anybody basically.
00:33:03.540 And so I'm just
00:33:04.720 making the thing
00:33:06.040 I love the most,
00:33:07.920 I'm treating her
00:33:08.840 like a prisoner.
00:33:10.280 Because she's not free.
00:33:11.400 I'm literally
00:33:13.440 her jailer.
00:33:15.400 And I feel like
00:33:16.500 her jailer every day.
00:33:17.680 Every moment
00:33:18.340 I'm not playing with her,
00:33:19.820 she's in jail.
00:33:21.700 She literally has to
00:33:22.800 just sit on the couch
00:33:23.800 for like eight fucking hours
00:33:25.780 waiting for me
00:33:26.580 to have some free time
00:33:27.700 to do something with her
00:33:28.680 for like ten minutes.
00:33:30.820 And then she'll go like,
00:33:32.200 what,
00:33:32.760 wait in jail
00:33:33.700 another six hours
00:33:35.080 until something comes up?
00:33:37.400 It's horrible
00:33:38.000 having a dog.
00:33:39.420 I so don't recommend it.
00:33:42.380 Anyway.
00:33:44.040 But I love dogs.
00:33:45.840 Physical possessions?
00:33:47.460 Yeah,
00:33:47.880 you don't get involved.
00:33:52.080 So musket
00:33:52.940 Twitter whistleblower.
00:33:59.440 So the whistleblower
00:34:00.700 is this painter.
00:34:03.740 He's a,
00:34:05.580 he was the head of security.
00:34:06.640 for Twitter.
00:34:08.720 How much do you imagine
00:34:09.720 the head of,
00:34:10.300 the ex-head of security
00:34:11.620 for Twitter
00:34:12.620 knows about the,
00:34:13.600 the internal workings?
00:34:16.300 Wouldn't,
00:34:16.740 wouldn't you love to
00:34:17.500 interview that guy?
00:34:19.960 Because didn't he say
00:34:21.080 that he thinks
00:34:21.600 there might be
00:34:22.060 some foreign agents
00:34:23.040 in the company?
00:34:24.900 Wouldn't you like to know
00:34:25.800 a little bit more
00:34:26.400 about that?
00:34:31.740 Doggy daycare.
00:34:33.540 But doggy daycare
00:34:34.820 requires me to,
00:34:36.180 drive the dog there
00:34:37.780 and then pick it up
00:34:38.640 and drive it back.
00:34:40.140 So that's like
00:34:41.040 an hour and a half
00:34:41.660 out of my day.
00:34:43.220 There's just nothing,
00:34:44.480 it's just an unsolvable
00:34:45.500 problem basically.
00:34:48.600 Anyway,
00:34:49.100 we'll find out more
00:34:49.760 about Twitter.
00:34:53.180 How many of you think
00:34:54.260 there's going to be
00:34:54.760 some kind of a civil war
00:34:55.900 in the United States?
00:34:56.720 Don't answer,
00:34:58.440 there's not going to be
00:34:59.040 a civil war.
00:35:00.580 Again,
00:35:01.880 all the people
00:35:02.520 talking about a civil war
00:35:03.600 are just addicted
00:35:04.260 to social media.
00:35:07.000 There's nobody
00:35:07.700 who doesn't use
00:35:08.620 social media
00:35:09.400 who thinks there's
00:35:10.080 going to be a civil war.
00:35:12.860 Not even close.
00:35:14.960 Not even close.
00:35:16.760 If January 6th
00:35:18.520 didn't cause
00:35:19.420 Republicans
00:35:20.340 to even arm themselves,
00:35:22.740 I mean,
00:35:23.080 I suppose they had
00:35:23.940 some weapons nearby,
00:35:25.320 but they didn't use
00:35:26.400 weapons on January 6th.
00:35:28.500 And that was,
00:35:29.400 at least in their minds,
00:35:30.760 that was a pretty big deal.
00:35:32.660 Now,
00:35:33.480 whether or not
00:35:34.200 they were right or wrong
00:35:35.020 is a separate question.
00:35:36.460 But in their minds,
00:35:37.380 that was a big deal.
00:35:38.760 They thought the
00:35:39.580 Republic had been
00:35:41.160 subverted.
00:35:42.820 And even that
00:35:43.660 didn't cause violence.
00:35:45.140 And it only caused
00:35:45.860 a little bit of,
00:35:47.260 you know,
00:35:47.540 well,
00:35:47.920 it caused some violence,
00:35:48.720 but it caused,
00:35:49.920 you know,
00:35:50.420 action only in one place.
00:35:51.980 It didn't even spread
00:35:53.000 around the country.
00:35:54.740 So,
00:35:56.200 we need to get rid
00:35:57.720 of the silliness.
00:35:59.980 That's not serious.
00:36:01.760 The whole civil war thing.
00:36:03.840 Right?
00:36:04.000 That's not serious.
00:36:05.400 And you need to
00:36:06.580 start treating it
00:36:08.320 as not serious.
00:36:13.600 You've spoiled your dog.
00:36:15.400 Yeah.
00:36:16.280 I didn't spoil my dog,
00:36:17.700 but the dog gets spoiled.
00:36:20.160 All right.
00:36:22.960 Did you know
00:36:23.860 there's an old interview
00:36:25.040 that I saw on Twitter today
00:36:26.640 in which Biden,
00:36:28.980 however many years ago,
00:36:30.560 talking about the war in Iraq,
00:36:33.240 and I guess he supported
00:36:34.100 the war in Iraq,
00:36:35.120 and he actually said out loud
00:36:37.780 that the story about Saddam
00:36:40.980 maybe having nuclear weapons
00:36:42.800 was intentionally a lie
00:36:45.360 by the government
00:36:47.920 and that they all knew it,
00:36:50.780 like the senators all knew it,
00:36:52.540 that it was a lie.
00:36:53.820 And the reason that
00:36:54.640 they went along with it,
00:36:56.540 and Biden says this directly,
00:36:58.580 that he went along with the lie
00:37:00.020 because he thought
00:37:01.760 that would sell better
00:37:02.740 to the public
00:37:03.820 than the truth.
00:37:06.620 I'm not making this up.
00:37:07.940 He actually said that.
00:37:09.300 He said that
00:37:10.260 the government lied
00:37:11.600 to the people
00:37:12.200 about nuclear weapons
00:37:13.980 or a nuclear program
00:37:15.340 in Iraq.
00:37:16.160 They knew they were lying,
00:37:18.140 and it's because
00:37:18.640 the real story
00:37:19.560 wouldn't sell as well.
00:37:22.240 He said that out loud
00:37:23.600 in direct language.
00:37:25.960 I mean,
00:37:26.180 I'm paraphrasing,
00:37:27.420 but he was just as direct.
00:37:29.540 Now,
00:37:29.860 he did argue
00:37:30.480 that the, quote,
00:37:31.960 totality of the situation
00:37:33.620 was sufficient for the war.
00:37:35.960 So his argument is,
00:37:38.220 yes,
00:37:39.340 Saddam had weapons
00:37:40.840 of mass destruction,
00:37:42.700 chemical weapons,
00:37:45.320 and while we could not
00:37:47.800 prove he had nuclear,
00:37:49.000 it was better to sell
00:37:50.460 that to the public.
00:37:52.720 Now,
00:37:54.120 did Saddam have
00:37:55.100 chemical weapons?
00:37:57.740 You all watched the news,
00:38:00.100 and I'm sure
00:38:00.580 there's no fake news.
00:38:02.140 Did Saddam have
00:38:03.240 chemical weapons?
00:38:04.360 Go.
00:38:06.180 Some say no,
00:38:07.280 some say yes.
00:38:09.240 I see mostly yeses,
00:38:10.360 but a lot of noes.
00:38:12.060 Yes,
00:38:12.500 no,
00:38:12.800 yes.
00:38:13.160 Now,
00:38:13.660 how could you all
00:38:14.660 have watched the same news,
00:38:16.740 and you have different opinions
00:38:17.920 about whether he had
00:38:18.640 chemical weapons?
00:38:19.940 How is that possible?
00:38:21.820 How could you all
00:38:22.800 have been watching
00:38:23.420 the same story?
00:38:24.700 This is about
00:38:25.400 a major,
00:38:26.960 major war,
00:38:28.300 and you don't know
00:38:29.260 the basics about it.
00:38:31.540 The basics.
00:38:32.200 Did he have
00:38:33.520 chemical weapons?
00:38:35.360 Well,
00:38:35.840 here's the weird thing
00:38:36.580 about being on Twitter.
00:38:39.340 So,
00:38:39.940 I tweet about this
00:38:40.660 morning,
00:38:41.900 and then I get
00:38:42.720 tweeted at
00:38:45.260 by Joshua Hartley,
00:38:48.340 who's on Twitter,
00:38:49.780 and
00:38:50.020 just take a moment
00:38:52.880 to consider
00:38:54.740 how awesome
00:38:55.480 this is,
00:38:56.640 what I'm going to tell you.
00:38:57.980 how awesome
00:38:59.280 is it
00:38:59.720 that we're
00:39:00.780 wondering about,
00:39:01.680 okay,
00:39:01.900 what really did
00:39:02.720 happen in Iraq?
00:39:03.920 And within minutes,
00:39:04.880 I get a tweet
00:39:05.540 from Joshua Hartley,
00:39:07.160 who says,
00:39:07.700 and I quote,
00:39:08.900 my platoon
00:39:09.740 guarded the main bunker
00:39:11.280 storing chemical weapons
00:39:12.720 in 2008.
00:39:15.440 What?
00:39:16.880 What?
00:39:18.400 Am I actually
00:39:19.400 talking to the person
00:39:20.340 who guarded
00:39:20.920 the weapons
00:39:21.460 of mass destruction,
00:39:22.520 so I don't have to
00:39:23.460 wonder if they were real?
00:39:25.340 I'm talking to the guy
00:39:26.180 who stood there
00:39:26.760 next to him.
00:39:28.700 All right,
00:39:28.900 so he goes on.
00:39:29.860 He goes,
00:39:30.760 no nuclear,
00:39:31.860 so he confirms
00:39:32.840 no nuclear,
00:39:34.100 but yes,
00:39:34.820 WMDs.
00:39:35.820 Saddam hadn't
00:39:36.780 destroyed them
00:39:37.560 as agreed.
00:39:39.440 Okay,
00:39:40.000 now to go back
00:39:40.980 to Biden's point,
00:39:42.740 if Saddam said
00:39:43.680 he would destroy them,
00:39:44.720 but we knew
00:39:45.720 he hadn't,
00:39:47.100 would that be
00:39:47.760 a cause for war?
00:39:49.600 They are weapons
00:39:50.280 of mass destruction.
00:39:51.120 You could argue
00:39:54.720 whether that's
00:39:55.240 a cause for war,
00:39:56.300 but I don't think
00:39:57.940 you can argue
00:39:58.540 that they had them
00:39:59.380 and they didn't
00:40:00.560 destroy them.
00:40:02.280 Now,
00:40:03.440 is the fact
00:40:04.080 that they didn't
00:40:04.740 destroy them
00:40:05.460 evidence that
00:40:07.840 Saddam was planning
00:40:09.040 to maybe use them?
00:40:10.500 Yes or no?
00:40:11.760 Is the fact
00:40:12.380 that Saddam
00:40:12.900 did not destroy them,
00:40:14.440 because that seems
00:40:15.240 to be proven,
00:40:17.280 is that proof
00:40:18.340 that he planned
00:40:19.940 to have them
00:40:21.420 available to use?
00:40:24.060 Do you know
00:40:24.700 how the United States
00:40:25.740 destroyed those
00:40:27.000 chemical weapons
00:40:27.800 finally?
00:40:28.660 Does anybody
00:40:29.020 know that story?
00:40:30.480 So they were there.
00:40:31.980 How did we
00:40:32.580 destroy them?
00:40:35.760 Does anybody know?
00:40:38.040 No,
00:40:38.560 we didn't use them.
00:40:42.600 Burn them?
00:40:44.180 They tried.
00:40:45.480 Blowing them up
00:40:46.540 was too risky.
00:40:48.160 Now,
00:40:50.160 I'm going to tell you
00:40:52.260 the answer.
00:40:55.340 We guarded them
00:40:56.620 until we left
00:40:57.380 and then ISIS
00:40:58.140 took them.
00:41:01.800 We guarded them
00:41:03.020 until we stopped
00:41:04.560 guarding it
00:41:05.140 and then ISIS
00:41:06.500 took it.
00:41:07.960 That actually
00:41:08.780 happened.
00:41:10.200 I think.
00:41:11.520 I mean,
00:41:11.980 that's the story
00:41:12.620 I'm getting.
00:41:14.240 Now,
00:41:14.600 here's the second
00:41:15.980 part of the story.
00:41:16.600 Do you know
00:41:18.560 why the United
00:41:19.120 States didn't
00:41:20.040 destroy them?
00:41:21.760 We didn't know
00:41:22.540 how.
00:41:23.900 The United
00:41:24.680 States
00:41:25.240 did not know
00:41:26.880 how
00:41:27.340 to do the
00:41:28.980 thing that we
00:41:29.560 told Saddam
00:41:30.380 he had to do
00:41:31.040 or we'd destroy
00:41:31.800 his country.
00:41:32.820 Let me say it
00:41:33.320 again.
00:41:34.040 The United
00:41:34.540 States did
00:41:35.520 not know
00:41:36.060 and still
00:41:36.560 does not
00:41:37.040 know
00:41:37.340 how to
00:41:38.360 destroy
00:41:38.720 those
00:41:39.100 chemical
00:41:39.940 weapons
00:41:40.340 without making
00:41:40.960 things worse.
00:41:41.640 but we
00:41:43.200 asked Saddam
00:41:44.120 to do it
00:41:44.660 and when he
00:41:46.040 didn't do
00:41:46.540 the thing
00:41:46.900 that's
00:41:47.140 impossible
00:41:47.640 we destroyed
00:41:49.220 his country
00:41:49.700 and killed
00:41:50.100 him
00:41:50.340 because he
00:41:52.580 didn't do
00:41:53.040 the thing
00:41:53.400 we asked
00:41:53.760 him to do
00:41:54.300 that we
00:41:55.360 know
00:41:55.580 wasn't
00:41:56.020 a fact
00:41:56.460 impossible.
00:41:59.780 That really
00:42:00.480 happened.
00:42:02.900 Amazing.
00:42:03.820 Now,
00:42:04.080 the other
00:42:04.300 thing is
00:42:04.600 we don't
00:42:04.920 know how
00:42:05.620 useful
00:42:06.940 these
00:42:07.620 chemical
00:42:08.500 weapons
00:42:08.820 were
00:42:09.080 because they
00:42:09.560 were old
00:42:10.120 and degraded.
00:42:11.820 Now,
00:42:12.000 the reason
00:42:12.380 that they
00:42:13.920 couldn't tell
00:42:14.640 you,
00:42:15.060 oh,
00:42:15.240 we found
00:42:15.660 all these
00:42:16.080 weapons of
00:42:16.600 mass destruction
00:42:17.300 and give
00:42:18.800 you full
00:42:19.180 details about
00:42:19.860 it was
00:42:20.260 because
00:42:20.940 they were
00:42:21.920 old
00:42:22.480 and it
00:42:23.800 did not
00:42:24.160 support the
00:42:24.760 narrative to
00:42:25.400 say the
00:42:25.740 only weapons
00:42:26.440 of mass
00:42:26.780 destruction
00:42:27.320 were old
00:42:28.560 and probably
00:42:29.000 didn't work.
00:42:31.840 So they
00:42:32.480 had to
00:42:32.740 change the
00:42:33.160 narrative
00:42:33.500 to what
00:42:34.540 would sell.
00:42:35.880 So now
00:42:36.360 that you
00:42:36.640 know that
00:42:36.960 your government
00:42:37.500 admits lying
00:42:38.660 to you
00:42:39.100 to get
00:42:39.740 you into
00:42:40.100 a war
00:42:40.620 would you
00:42:43.220 believe
00:42:43.520 anything
00:42:43.980 they ever
00:42:44.460 tell you
00:42:44.840 again?
00:42:46.140 Not if
00:42:46.720 you're
00:42:46.880 smart.
00:42:48.160 Not if
00:42:48.600 you're
00:42:48.760 smart.
00:42:51.720 So further,
00:42:52.960 this is
00:42:53.480 Joshua Hartley
00:42:54.160 who had
00:42:54.520 guarded the
00:42:55.240 weapons of
00:42:55.860 mass destruction.
00:42:56.640 I'll let you
00:42:57.120 know what
00:42:57.360 the rest of
00:42:57.840 his tweets
00:42:58.280 here.
00:42:59.000 He said,
00:42:59.400 I was able
00:42:59.760 to discuss
00:43:00.320 this with
00:43:00.720 members of
00:43:01.140 the Bush
00:43:01.420 administration
00:43:01.940 after the
00:43:02.420 war and
00:43:03.500 the lies
00:43:03.960 around this
00:43:04.500 are far
00:43:04.920 deeper and
00:43:05.380 more complex
00:43:06.140 than can be
00:43:07.020 discerned by
00:43:07.900 publicly available
00:43:09.420 information and
00:43:10.480 he said I
00:43:11.040 could DM
00:43:11.440 him if I
00:43:12.100 wanted to
00:43:12.820 know more.
00:43:13.940 But this is
00:43:14.520 what he's
00:43:14.820 saying publicly
00:43:15.420 on Twitter.
00:43:18.660 And he
00:43:19.360 said that
00:43:20.380 some of
00:43:21.200 the WMDs
00:43:22.940 probably were
00:43:23.780 usable but
00:43:24.740 many of
00:43:25.120 them were
00:43:25.440 degraded.
00:43:26.140 so apparently
00:43:31.720 they were
00:43:32.120 guarding a
00:43:32.940 facility that
00:43:33.800 the politicians
00:43:34.620 wanted you
00:43:35.240 to believe
00:43:35.560 didn't exist.
00:43:38.100 Now the
00:43:38.700 New York
00:43:38.960 Times was
00:43:39.520 reporting about
00:43:40.200 the old
00:43:40.540 chemical weapons
00:43:41.300 that were
00:43:41.520 found.
00:43:44.260 And I
00:43:45.340 think the
00:43:45.660 New York
00:43:45.900 Times actually
00:43:46.520 reported that
00:43:47.440 the story
00:43:50.000 was being
00:43:51.700 managed by
00:43:52.300 the government
00:43:52.780 because otherwise
00:43:53.760 you couldn't
00:43:54.260 sell it to
00:43:54.720 the public.
00:43:56.140 Wow.
00:43:59.820 Wow.
00:44:00.680 Because the
00:44:01.200 weapons they
00:44:01.960 found were
00:44:02.280 too old to
00:44:02.860 make their
00:44:03.160 case.
00:44:05.020 All right.
00:44:06.860 So how
00:44:08.180 much of a
00:44:10.260 lie
00:44:10.620 yeah how
00:44:14.180 much of a
00:44:14.620 lie we know
00:44:15.280 about Tonkin
00:44:16.480 Tonkin Bay.
00:44:17.960 So the
00:44:18.340 government has
00:44:19.300 lied to get us
00:44:20.080 into war before
00:44:20.820 we know that.
00:44:21.640 That's a matter
00:44:22.380 of historical
00:44:23.160 record.
00:44:23.620 But you
00:44:26.600 wonder how
00:44:27.140 far the
00:44:27.580 gaslighting
00:44:28.260 can go.
00:44:30.000 And here's
00:44:30.360 an example
00:44:30.820 of how
00:44:31.240 far the
00:44:31.640 gaslighting
00:44:32.280 can go.
00:44:34.080 So I
00:44:34.380 guess Steve
00:44:35.440 Doocy asked
00:44:36.320 Jean-Pierre
00:44:38.420 the spokesperson
00:44:40.960 for Biden.
00:44:42.500 Doocy said
00:44:43.360 somebody
00:44:44.900 unvaccinated
00:44:45.820 comes over
00:44:46.580 on a plane
00:44:47.220 talking about
00:44:47.840 immigration.
00:44:49.240 You say
00:44:49.820 that's not
00:44:50.340 okay.
00:44:50.680 somebody walks
00:44:52.380 into Texas
00:44:53.020 or Arizona
00:44:53.700 unvaccinated
00:44:54.760 they're allowed
00:44:55.720 to stay.
00:44:57.420 And Jean-Pierre
00:44:57.960 says that's
00:44:58.960 not how it
00:44:59.520 works.
00:45:00.660 It's not
00:45:01.140 like someone
00:45:01.700 walks over.
00:45:05.940 What?
00:45:07.500 It's not
00:45:08.280 like somebody
00:45:08.800 just walks
00:45:09.360 over the
00:45:09.780 border.
00:45:11.600 Turn on
00:45:12.380 the television.
00:45:14.240 You can
00:45:14.840 see live
00:45:15.620 streams of
00:45:16.480 people walking
00:45:17.100 over the
00:45:17.500 border just
00:45:18.060 walking over.
00:45:18.780 being guided
00:45:20.720 by the
00:45:21.080 coyotes.
00:45:21.840 It's all
00:45:22.460 over the
00:45:22.820 news.
00:45:23.520 All you
00:45:23.720 have to
00:45:23.900 do is
00:45:24.100 turn it
00:45:24.440 on.
00:45:24.740 You can
00:45:24.940 see the
00:45:25.280 lines of
00:45:25.780 people coming
00:45:26.200 over.
00:45:27.800 And then
00:45:28.440 Doocy says
00:45:29.040 that's exactly
00:45:30.000 what is
00:45:30.380 happening.
00:45:32.280 It's not
00:45:32.940 like someone
00:45:33.360 just walks
00:45:33.900 over.
00:45:35.140 That's
00:45:35.620 exactly
00:45:36.160 what's
00:45:36.500 happening.
00:45:37.760 So then
00:45:38.300 the spokesperson
00:45:39.280 went on
00:45:40.060 and just
00:45:40.520 sort of
00:45:40.800 changed the
00:45:41.280 subject to
00:45:41.900 all the
00:45:42.320 awesome
00:45:42.640 things they're
00:45:43.260 doing to
00:45:43.680 control the
00:45:44.200 border.
00:45:44.420 now I
00:45:48.300 get that
00:45:48.720 her job
00:45:49.240 is to
00:45:49.620 support the
00:45:50.520 administration
00:45:50.960 but this
00:45:52.360 is such a
00:45:53.220 transparent
00:45:54.240 lie.
00:45:56.900 Are they
00:45:57.960 supposed to
00:45:58.480 lie to you
00:45:59.020 that directly?
00:46:00.760 Because it
00:46:01.120 would be one
00:46:01.540 thing to
00:46:01.920 say oh
00:46:02.620 I think
00:46:03.740 the inflation
00:46:04.880 is transitory
00:46:05.880 which they
00:46:07.680 probably didn't
00:46:08.460 think but at
00:46:09.060 least they had
00:46:09.460 something like
00:46:10.380 an argument.
00:46:11.460 Say well
00:46:11.960 these things
00:46:12.740 are temporary.
00:46:13.380 At least
00:46:14.100 there was
00:46:15.060 something to
00:46:15.800 it.
00:46:17.740 But this
00:46:18.460 is just a
00:46:19.000 direct lie
00:46:19.560 that your
00:46:19.920 eyes are
00:46:20.360 not working.
00:46:21.580 Oh yeah
00:46:22.400 your eyes
00:46:22.940 see people
00:46:23.540 coming across
00:46:24.100 that border
00:46:24.540 right now
00:46:25.060 on a live
00:46:25.620 stream but
00:46:26.920 that's not
00:46:27.400 happening.
00:46:27.880 The thing
00:46:28.180 you see
00:46:28.480 with your
00:46:28.780 own eyes
00:46:29.220 right now
00:46:29.760 that's not
00:46:30.560 happening at
00:46:30.980 all.
00:46:32.280 So
00:46:32.520 it's just
00:46:35.980 mind boggling
00:46:36.680 that the
00:46:37.920 government can
00:46:38.460 lie to you
00:46:39.060 that directly.
00:46:41.300 It would be
00:46:41.600 one thing if
00:46:42.160 you couldn't
00:46:42.640 tell it was
00:46:43.320 a lie.
00:46:45.180 Oh my
00:46:45.820 God.
00:46:49.640 Who is
00:46:50.260 winning in
00:46:50.740 Ukraine?
00:46:52.420 Russia or
00:46:53.060 Ukraine?
00:46:56.020 What do you
00:46:56.700 think?
00:46:57.280 Who's winning?
00:46:58.760 Have you
00:46:59.080 noticed that
00:46:59.600 the news
00:47:00.280 has basically
00:47:02.960 just turned
00:47:03.500 that back
00:47:04.060 into fog?
00:47:05.520 So when the
00:47:06.420 whole thing
00:47:06.760 started there
00:47:07.500 was fog of
00:47:08.420 war.
00:47:08.800 You didn't
00:47:08.960 know what was
00:47:09.240 going on.
00:47:09.960 And then it
00:47:10.360 seemed like
00:47:10.720 things cleared
00:47:11.280 up a little
00:47:11.680 bit.
00:47:12.480 It looked
00:47:12.740 like there
00:47:13.040 was going
00:47:13.280 to be
00:47:13.400 some kind
00:47:13.760 of stability
00:47:14.440 where Russia
00:47:15.220 was going
00:47:15.620 to maybe
00:47:16.380 keep the
00:47:16.900 parts that
00:47:17.320 they'd occupied
00:47:18.040 and then
00:47:19.440 maybe Ukraine
00:47:20.340 would keep
00:47:20.740 the rest
00:47:21.280 and maybe
00:47:22.000 that would
00:47:22.320 be how
00:47:23.160 things shake
00:47:23.720 out in the
00:47:24.060 end.
00:47:25.920 But
00:47:26.380 Ukraine says
00:47:28.640 it's doing a
00:47:29.220 counter-offensive
00:47:30.020 in Kyrgyz
00:47:33.020 and if you
00:47:36.620 look at
00:47:36.940 social media
00:47:37.660 people are
00:47:39.260 absolutely
00:47:40.000 convinced that
00:47:40.840 they know
00:47:41.360 which side
00:47:41.920 is winning
00:47:42.340 and why.
00:47:43.860 And they
00:47:44.140 just have
00:47:44.460 completely
00:47:44.940 different takes.
00:47:46.740 So there
00:47:47.560 are a bunch
00:47:47.860 of accounts
00:47:48.360 that say
00:47:48.860 Russia is
00:47:49.820 definitely
00:47:50.140 winning and
00:47:50.640 it's over.
00:47:51.600 But honestly
00:47:52.240 they all look
00:47:52.840 like Russian
00:47:53.480 agents to me.
00:47:56.220 Do you see
00:47:56.880 that?
00:47:57.840 It looks
00:47:58.660 to me
00:47:59.080 like Russia
00:47:59.900 itself has
00:48:00.900 so infiltrated
00:48:01.920 Twitter that
00:48:04.060 whenever you
00:48:04.600 say Ukraine
00:48:05.460 is doing
00:48:05.880 anything right
00:48:06.620 it looks
00:48:08.040 I can't tell
00:48:08.860 I'm not
00:48:09.480 positive
00:48:09.880 but it looks
00:48:11.160 like a bunch
00:48:11.640 of Russian
00:48:12.040 accounts come
00:48:12.680 over and
00:48:13.960 start slapping
00:48:14.820 you down
00:48:15.240 right away.
00:48:16.840 Have you
00:48:17.240 noticed that?
00:48:18.400 Is it my
00:48:18.840 imagination?
00:48:19.900 Because they
00:48:20.240 look like
00:48:20.640 they're obviously
00:48:21.220 not real
00:48:21.700 people.
00:48:22.680 They look
00:48:23.020 like they're
00:48:23.320 obviously Russian
00:48:24.280 operatives of
00:48:25.920 some kind.
00:48:26.880 Or you
00:48:27.980 see the
00:48:28.260 opposite.
00:48:28.780 Somebody
00:48:28.980 says you
00:48:29.380 see more
00:48:29.820 Ukrainian
00:48:30.460 operatives
00:48:31.140 coming in.
00:48:32.020 But you
00:48:32.220 see both
00:48:32.680 right?
00:48:34.740 The Ukrainian
00:48:35.760 ones I think
00:48:36.720 in many cases
00:48:37.440 are just
00:48:37.880 Americans
00:48:38.340 who are
00:48:38.720 pro-Ukraine.
00:48:40.440 But the
00:48:41.120 pro-Russian
00:48:41.680 ones they
00:48:42.680 all look
00:48:43.300 like they're
00:48:43.840 some kind
00:48:45.380 of bot
00:48:45.840 farm.
00:48:47.560 I don't
00:48:48.020 know.
00:48:48.560 It's hard
00:48:48.900 to know
00:48:49.280 because
00:48:50.240 confirmation
00:48:51.160 bias is so
00:48:51.980 strong.
00:48:53.360 But here's
00:48:53.940 things that
00:48:54.660 among the
00:48:55.520 things that
00:48:55.960 you hear
00:48:56.360 there's a
00:48:56.980 Kursan
00:48:57.420 counter
00:48:57.780 offensive
00:48:58.160 that's
00:48:58.620 already
00:48:58.860 broken
00:48:59.220 through
00:48:59.500 the
00:48:59.680 Russian
00:48:59.920 lines
00:49:00.480 or not
00:49:01.720 or nothing
00:49:02.500 like that's
00:49:02.980 happening.
00:49:03.420 That's
00:49:03.580 possible.
00:49:04.720 Or Russia
00:49:05.500 has complete
00:49:06.420 air superiority
00:49:07.520 or not
00:49:09.060 because the
00:49:09.940 Ukrainians do
00:49:10.700 have anti-aircraft
00:49:11.720 that's working.
00:49:13.920 The supply
00:49:14.900 lines are cut
00:49:15.740 for the Russian
00:49:16.540 occupiers or
00:49:17.920 not because
00:49:18.800 they have a
00:49:19.180 land bridge
00:49:19.700 to anything
00:49:20.240 they want.
00:49:20.800 so basically
00:49:23.320 everything that
00:49:24.200 we know
00:49:24.540 about the
00:49:24.940 war has
00:49:26.140 a or
00:49:26.960 not
00:49:27.420 they have
00:49:28.740 to end
00:49:29.020 to it
00:49:29.420 because I
00:49:30.340 don't think
00:49:30.700 we have
00:49:30.960 any information
00:49:31.700 that's useful.
00:49:34.140 I'll tell you
00:49:34.920 what I
00:49:35.720 predict.
00:49:36.780 And by the
00:49:37.080 way, so
00:49:38.340 being the
00:49:38.800 only person
00:49:39.420 I know
00:49:40.040 of, I
00:49:40.940 don't know
00:49:41.260 if anybody
00:49:41.660 else predicted
00:49:42.180 this, at
00:49:42.920 the beginning
00:49:43.300 I said
00:49:43.760 that Ukraine
00:49:44.940 would not
00:49:45.660 easily fall
00:49:46.520 to Russia
00:49:47.060 because Ukraine
00:49:48.220 would have
00:49:48.640 advanced
00:49:49.200 weaponry.
00:49:51.740 So part
00:49:52.540 of Ukraine
00:49:53.100 maybe the
00:49:53.840 most strategic
00:49:54.460 part is
00:49:55.600 occupied, but
00:49:57.160 most of
00:49:57.660 Ukraine looks
00:49:58.320 like it's
00:49:58.740 not under
00:49:59.280 immediate threat.
00:50:01.280 So was
00:50:02.180 my prediction
00:50:02.880 the best
00:50:03.680 of the
00:50:04.720 entire war?
00:50:06.080 I would say
00:50:06.600 yes.
00:50:07.680 I would say
00:50:08.460 although I was
00:50:09.220 not completely
00:50:09.920 right, I
00:50:11.120 was the
00:50:11.500 closest right
00:50:12.440 by far.
00:50:16.240 Well, you're
00:50:17.400 saying I'm
00:50:17.800 wrong, but
00:50:18.300 give me a
00:50:18.700 reason.
00:50:20.060 Is it
00:50:20.620 true or
00:50:21.040 false that
00:50:21.620 Ukraine still
00:50:22.400 exists as a
00:50:23.120 country?
00:50:24.440 True or
00:50:24.860 false?
00:50:25.720 Because the
00:50:26.480 experts said
00:50:27.220 that by now
00:50:27.800 they would not
00:50:28.360 exist as a
00:50:29.040 country.
00:50:29.820 I said they
00:50:30.440 would.
00:50:32.120 How am I
00:50:32.980 wrong?
00:50:35.500 Yes, they'll
00:50:36.100 exist as a
00:50:37.400 country.
00:50:38.380 Yes, I'm
00:50:39.020 right.
00:50:39.840 Or no, they
00:50:40.660 will already be
00:50:41.280 conquered by
00:50:41.840 Russia, where
00:50:43.560 everybody else
00:50:44.360 said.
00:50:45.580 And you
00:50:46.180 still think I'm
00:50:46.740 wrong?
00:50:46.980 Well, what's
00:50:48.840 the argument
00:50:49.240 for that?
00:50:51.300 Now, of
00:50:52.580 course, people
00:50:53.320 keep saying to
00:50:54.020 me, but you're
00:50:54.600 just a
00:50:54.960 cartoonist, so
00:50:56.240 get out of
00:50:56.680 this military
00:50:57.300 stuff.
00:50:58.040 To which I
00:50:58.540 say, you
00:50:59.380 know, you're
00:50:59.740 right.
00:51:00.320 I don't have
00:51:00.960 any military
00:51:01.680 knowledge or
00:51:03.720 background at
00:51:04.580 all, but I
00:51:06.340 was the only
00:51:07.060 one who was
00:51:07.620 right about
00:51:08.100 Ukraine,
00:51:09.840 militarily.
00:51:11.320 That's just
00:51:11.820 a fact.
00:51:13.180 I also had
00:51:14.080 no expertise
00:51:15.620 in politics
00:51:17.500 when I
00:51:18.160 predicted that
00:51:18.800 Trump would
00:51:19.260 win the
00:51:19.640 first time.
00:51:21.400 There are
00:51:21.800 some things
00:51:22.300 that I'm
00:51:23.040 not sure you
00:51:23.500 need to be
00:51:23.860 an expert to
00:51:24.900 predict, because
00:51:25.680 there are macro
00:51:26.940 variables that
00:51:28.560 are so important.
00:51:29.860 And the macro
00:51:30.400 variable, I
00:51:31.300 think, is that
00:51:32.620 nobody could
00:51:33.480 ever conquer a
00:51:34.760 modern country
00:51:35.440 with modern
00:51:35.980 weapons.
00:51:36.560 It's just not
00:51:37.100 a thing anymore.
00:51:37.740 So that was
00:51:39.220 my thinking,
00:51:40.240 that the big
00:51:41.140 picture of
00:51:41.860 modern weaponry
00:51:43.780 was being
00:51:45.000 ignored.
00:51:47.820 So I
00:51:50.700 think there's
00:51:51.980 a non-zero
00:51:52.700 chance that
00:51:53.660 Ukraine is
00:51:54.260 going to
00:51:54.680 degrade the
00:51:55.500 occupation to
00:51:57.380 the point where
00:51:57.920 it won't make
00:51:58.440 sense for
00:51:59.080 Russia to
00:51:59.960 stay.
00:52:00.720 They might
00:52:01.060 stay anyway,
00:52:01.960 because they
00:52:03.380 don't want to
00:52:03.780 look like they
00:52:04.220 retreated.
00:52:05.060 But I've got a
00:52:05.640 feeling that
00:52:06.060 Ukraine can
00:52:06.660 degrade
00:52:07.300 the military
00:52:08.780 assets in the
00:52:09.920 occupied countries
00:52:10.740 just forever.
00:52:11.860 They'll just
00:52:12.180 keep lobbing
00:52:12.820 artillery and
00:52:13.620 drones and
00:52:14.260 missiles there
00:52:14.820 until there's
00:52:15.320 nothing left.
00:52:16.920 Whereas, given
00:52:18.240 that Russia is
00:52:18.980 not trying to
00:52:19.800 conquer the
00:52:20.640 rest of
00:52:21.080 Ukraine,
00:52:22.600 they're just
00:52:23.100 fighting probably
00:52:24.140 the military
00:52:24.740 that's closest to
00:52:25.720 the fighting
00:52:26.100 there, I
00:52:27.540 feel like that
00:52:28.440 gives Ukraine
00:52:29.040 an advantage.
00:52:30.880 Now, not an
00:52:31.800 advantage that I
00:52:32.480 think they will
00:52:32.940 kick Russia out of
00:52:33.900 that territory.
00:52:35.260 So let me be
00:52:35.900 clear.
00:52:36.100 I'm not
00:52:36.720 predicting, I'm
00:52:37.800 not, that
00:52:39.580 Ukraine will
00:52:40.280 recapture the
00:52:41.200 territory.
00:52:42.180 I think that
00:52:42.620 would be a lot
00:52:43.100 to expect.
00:52:44.320 But I do
00:52:45.000 think that
00:52:45.440 Ukraine is
00:52:45.960 just going to
00:52:46.460 pound it
00:52:46.940 down until
00:52:47.460 nobody wants
00:52:48.060 to live
00:52:48.420 there, including
00:52:49.160 the citizens.
00:52:51.020 I think that's
00:52:51.880 going to happen.
00:52:52.580 I think it'll
00:52:52.920 just become
00:52:53.340 unlivable at
00:52:54.200 some point.
00:52:54.880 Probably
00:52:55.180 already is.
00:52:57.260 All right,
00:52:57.600 that's my
00:52:57.940 prediction.
00:53:01.020 So we're
00:53:01.660 watching Biden
00:53:02.380 destroying Europe
00:53:03.320 and much
00:53:03.800 of the
00:53:04.040 world.
00:53:05.500 And I
00:53:06.400 saw an
00:53:06.740 interesting
00:53:07.140 tweet by
00:53:09.680 Nan
00:53:10.180 Hayworth.
00:53:10.880 She said,
00:53:11.380 follow the
00:53:12.480 money.
00:53:14.380 And I
00:53:15.880 thought, that's
00:53:16.440 interesting.
00:53:18.140 Because it's a
00:53:19.200 little confusing
00:53:19.920 about why the
00:53:20.780 Biden
00:53:21.040 administration is
00:53:21.980 acting exactly
00:53:22.820 the way they
00:53:23.360 are with the
00:53:26.240 Ukraine situation.
00:53:27.460 And the only
00:53:28.060 way I could
00:53:28.600 understand it
00:53:29.320 is if there's
00:53:31.240 somehow money
00:53:31.860 involved.
00:53:33.700 And I guess
00:53:34.160 you could say
00:53:34.700 that maybe the
00:53:36.720 Biden administration
00:53:37.400 has to help
00:53:38.140 Ukraine because
00:53:38.940 Ukraine knows
00:53:39.760 too much about
00:53:40.380 the Biden
00:53:40.760 administration.
00:53:41.960 I believe we're
00:53:42.960 being blackmailed.
00:53:43.940 What do you
00:53:44.300 think?
00:53:45.580 I believe the
00:53:46.200 United States
00:53:46.860 government,
00:53:47.680 Biden, is
00:53:48.600 being blackmailed
00:53:49.460 by Zelensky,
00:53:50.840 either directly
00:53:51.620 or indirectly.
00:53:52.520 That doesn't
00:53:53.000 mean he actually
00:53:53.540 said directly,
00:53:54.640 we will do
00:53:55.460 this.
00:53:56.260 But I feel as
00:53:57.200 if Biden knows
00:53:58.060 that if Ukraine
00:53:59.320 goes under,
00:54:00.080 so does he.
00:54:01.620 So I feel like
00:54:02.520 we're fighting
00:54:03.000 Biden's war.
00:54:04.120 It looks like
00:54:05.080 Hunter's war,
00:54:05.760 basically.
00:54:07.140 I think Hunter
00:54:08.260 got us into a
00:54:09.380 war.
00:54:10.840 I think Hunter
00:54:11.800 is going to be
00:54:12.600 the cause of
00:54:13.820 starvation in
00:54:14.720 Europe.
00:54:17.180 Is that too
00:54:19.140 far?
00:54:20.600 I believe
00:54:21.540 Hunter's
00:54:22.160 addiction is
00:54:25.220 actually going
00:54:25.920 to destroy
00:54:26.420 Europe.
00:54:28.060 So you
00:54:29.760 don't think
00:54:30.140 addiction is
00:54:30.680 a problem?
00:54:31.580 There's one
00:54:32.100 guy who was
00:54:32.660 addicted that
00:54:33.380 probably will
00:54:33.920 destroy Europe.
00:54:36.520 Changed the
00:54:37.060 entire global
00:54:38.420 security issue
00:54:39.580 for, I don't
00:54:40.920 know, decades
00:54:41.540 or a hundred
00:54:41.900 years.
00:54:44.220 That's what it
00:54:44.820 looks like to
00:54:45.240 me.
00:54:45.580 It looks like
00:54:45.980 one guy was
00:54:46.640 addicted, and
00:54:47.920 his addiction
00:54:48.540 caused him to
00:54:49.240 have to have a
00:54:49.720 lot of money.
00:54:51.320 And if you're
00:54:52.040 addicted, you
00:54:52.760 can't not have
00:54:53.460 a lot of money.
00:54:54.960 And the only
00:54:55.400 way to get it
00:54:55.980 fast, maybe the
00:54:57.460 amount he
00:54:58.020 needed was to
00:54:59.280 do whatever he
00:54:59.940 did that might
00:55:00.580 have been a
00:55:00.900 little sketchy.
00:55:03.140 So, yeah, I
00:55:05.600 mean, one
00:55:06.260 addict probably
00:55:07.880 destroyed Europe.
00:55:09.620 You know, you
00:55:10.040 don't think one
00:55:10.600 person can make a
00:55:11.440 difference in this
00:55:12.080 world?
00:55:13.340 Well, he's one
00:55:15.260 person, and I
00:55:16.660 think he destroyed
00:55:17.320 Europe.
00:55:17.720 So, there's
00:55:22.700 that.
00:55:24.580 All right, ladies
00:55:25.340 and gentlemen, I
00:55:26.140 believe that
00:55:27.380 concludes my
00:55:28.860 prepared remarks.
00:55:30.840 And so, that
00:55:32.620 brings us to
00:55:33.380 what is it you
00:55:34.220 would want me to
00:55:34.840 say that I
00:55:35.220 didn't say?
00:55:40.660 Anything I
00:55:41.260 missed?
00:55:42.500 Parmesan
00:55:42.920 Patriots.
00:55:51.080 Ukraine and
00:55:52.000 Russia have
00:55:52.500 our number.
00:55:53.140 Maybe.
00:55:57.460 Where are the
00:55:58.220 aliens hiding?
00:56:03.860 Yeah, maybe,
00:56:04.940 Peter.
00:56:05.420 I don't know.
00:56:08.380 Hunter's
00:56:08.820 addiction was
00:56:10.740 caused due to
00:56:11.480 the inability
00:56:11.840 to manage the
00:56:12.440 anxiety of
00:56:12.980 running the
00:56:13.400 corrupt family
00:56:13.920 business.
00:56:19.320 No, you're
00:56:19.940 not the only
00:56:20.380 one.
00:56:22.380 Oh, I
00:56:22.900 haven't heard
00:56:23.260 about Gavis
00:56:23.920 McGinnis, or
00:56:25.060 Gavin McGinnis.
00:56:26.460 I haven't heard
00:56:27.080 anything about
00:56:27.640 that story.
00:56:30.660 Did you ever
00:56:31.320 watch Sam
00:56:31.780 Harris's
00:56:32.300 Clarification?
00:56:33.200 I did not.
00:56:36.560 By the way,
00:56:37.240 there's a
00:56:37.960 movie coming
00:56:39.660 out soon.
00:56:41.620 Larry Elders,
00:56:43.000 it's Uncle
00:56:45.240 Tom 2.
00:56:47.280 Uncle Tom
00:56:48.080 2.
00:56:48.940 And I just
00:56:49.660 started watching
00:56:50.300 it, and it's
00:56:51.100 kind of mind
00:56:51.620 blowing.
00:56:52.300 I've got to
00:56:52.980 admit, like,
00:56:55.520 the first 10
00:56:56.460 minutes of it,
00:56:57.960 well, I've
00:56:58.320 watched more
00:56:58.700 than that.
00:56:59.080 Maybe the
00:56:59.380 first half
00:57:00.740 hour or so.
00:57:03.180 It's
00:57:03.620 mind blowing.
00:57:04.680 I'm not going
00:57:05.320 to tell you why
00:57:05.900 yet.
00:57:06.180 I'll give you a
00:57:06.740 full review when
00:57:07.520 I'm done.
00:57:08.680 But it's
00:57:09.380 mind blowing.
00:57:10.740 it'll fuck
00:57:13.560 you up.
00:57:15.440 If you watch
00:57:16.300 it, your
00:57:16.920 entire sense
00:57:18.000 of what is
00:57:18.840 happening, or
00:57:20.060 what has
00:57:20.660 happened,
00:57:21.340 specifically about
00:57:22.700 black Americans,
00:57:24.000 it completely
00:57:25.120 will change your
00:57:26.060 mind about what's
00:57:26.760 happening.
00:57:28.760 Now, I'm not
00:57:29.800 going to say I
00:57:30.280 agree with all
00:57:31.340 of the
00:57:31.980 editorial.
00:57:33.360 editorial.
00:57:34.480 That's
00:57:34.900 different.
00:57:36.380 It has an
00:57:37.080 editorial edge
00:57:37.900 and a
00:57:38.280 specific, let's
00:57:40.180 say, a
00:57:40.460 specific set
00:57:41.080 of actions
00:57:42.680 that would
00:57:44.280 make things
00:57:44.800 better.
00:57:45.940 And I'm not
00:57:46.560 going to say I
00:57:47.020 back all of
00:57:47.680 that, primarily
00:57:48.900 because it's a
00:57:49.600 religious, sort
00:57:51.580 of a religious-based
00:57:52.540 argument.
00:57:52.900 And since I'm
00:57:54.860 not a believer,
00:57:56.820 if it works, it
00:57:58.040 works.
00:57:58.500 So if it's good
00:57:59.160 for black
00:57:59.600 Americans, it's
00:58:00.480 good for me.
00:58:02.060 So I'm not
00:58:02.800 going to be
00:58:03.040 against it.
00:58:03.680 I just can't
00:58:04.160 make the
00:58:04.440 argument.
00:58:04.720 So it's
00:58:12.320 called Uncle
00:58:13.180 Tom 2, so
00:58:14.260 it's the
00:58:14.580 sequel to his
00:58:15.920 first film,
00:58:16.820 Uncle Tom.
00:58:27.320 Be a
00:58:28.000 believer.
00:58:30.400 I did not
00:58:31.280 get a guitar
00:58:31.900 yet.
00:58:33.000 It'll be my
00:58:33.520 Christmas present
00:58:34.200 to myself.
00:58:35.600 Will the FBI
00:58:36.660 target you for
00:58:37.500 speaking out
00:58:38.100 against government
00:58:39.000 lies?
00:58:40.200 What do you
00:58:40.580 think?
00:58:42.100 What do you
00:58:42.680 think?
00:58:43.840 You know, I
00:58:44.480 thought about
00:58:45.140 maybe using my
00:58:47.480 man cave to
00:58:48.520 invite people in
00:58:50.200 for interviews,
00:58:51.460 and I thought
00:58:52.220 that if I brought
00:58:52.860 people into my
00:58:53.580 home to
00:58:55.740 interview them,
00:58:56.500 I would have
00:58:57.260 to warn them
00:58:58.060 that their
00:58:59.640 communication is
00:59:00.600 not secure
00:59:01.320 in my own
00:59:02.780 home.
00:59:03.100 home, because
00:59:04.880 I thought to
00:59:05.260 myself, who's
00:59:05.900 the most
00:59:06.180 important person
00:59:07.040 I could get,
00:59:07.780 maybe a
00:59:08.300 politician or
00:59:08.900 something, who
00:59:09.280 would come to
00:59:09.680 my house,
00:59:10.580 because that's
00:59:11.120 sort of a big
00:59:11.820 ask.
00:59:12.300 I'm not
00:59:12.580 exactly close
00:59:13.300 to a major
00:59:13.780 metropolitan area.
00:59:15.220 So, but I
00:59:18.360 thought, if it's
00:59:20.140 anybody important, I
00:59:21.600 would have to
00:59:21.960 make sure they
00:59:22.500 didn't tell me
00:59:23.020 anything even
00:59:23.580 privately in my
00:59:24.900 own house.
00:59:25.440 So, my assumption
00:59:27.340 is that my home is
00:59:28.540 not secure, meaning
00:59:30.900 that I could be
00:59:33.380 listened to.
00:59:34.580 Now, keep in
00:59:35.140 mind, I have
00:59:35.620 digital assistants,
00:59:38.720 and I have a
00:59:39.280 bunch of iPads
00:59:40.280 and my phone.
00:59:42.380 It's my
00:59:42.840 understanding that
00:59:44.260 if the government
00:59:44.840 had a reason to
00:59:46.260 listen in, they
00:59:46.940 could do it.
00:59:47.700 Am I wrong?
00:59:48.860 If the government
00:59:49.560 had a warrant,
00:59:52.360 FISA, FISA,
00:59:53.660 could they not
00:59:54.860 get into my
00:59:55.640 Alexa and just
00:59:56.540 listen to me all
00:59:57.280 day long?
00:59:58.500 If they had a
00:59:59.280 reason.
00:59:59.960 Yeah, they could,
01:00:00.520 right?
01:00:01.220 And do you think
01:00:02.040 that the government
01:00:02.660 would have trouble
01:00:03.880 making up a
01:00:05.580 reason for me?
01:00:08.320 I think they
01:00:09.080 could make up a
01:00:09.620 reason for
01:00:09.980 anybody.
01:00:11.940 And do you
01:00:12.540 think a judge
01:00:13.060 would sign it?
01:00:14.660 Obviously, yes.
01:00:16.180 Because we see
01:00:16.980 that judges will
01:00:17.680 sign anything.
01:00:19.980 So, what are
01:00:21.300 the odds that
01:00:22.140 I'm not being
01:00:23.600 targeted, not
01:00:24.420 necessarily by
01:00:24.980 the FBI, but
01:00:26.680 by somebody,
01:00:27.960 either a foreign
01:00:28.640 entity or
01:00:29.380 somebody?
01:00:30.940 Yeah.
01:00:31.260 I live my
01:00:32.320 life as though
01:00:33.460 everything I say
01:00:34.420 is public.
01:00:37.720 Now, that
01:00:38.380 doesn't mean I
01:00:39.160 don't say things
01:00:39.920 that would be
01:00:40.380 embarrassing.
01:00:41.900 I just mean I
01:00:42.680 think I'm
01:00:43.780 completely
01:00:44.200 unblackmailable
01:00:45.360 because there's
01:00:46.540 nothing embarrassing
01:00:47.280 that would
01:00:47.680 embarrass me.
01:00:49.820 You know, like
01:00:50.360 there's stuff that
01:00:51.240 would be
01:00:51.660 embarrassing,
01:00:52.300 thing, but it
01:00:53.980 wouldn't embarrass
01:00:54.500 me.
01:00:55.360 I mean, I
01:00:55.680 would just
01:00:55.920 think it
01:00:56.160 was funny.
01:01:03.000 In the
01:01:03.540 bedroom also,
01:01:04.220 yeah, I mean,
01:01:04.680 I have a
01:01:05.700 digital assistant
01:01:06.460 in my bedroom
01:01:07.080 as well.
01:01:08.180 There's nothing,
01:01:09.580 there's literally
01:01:10.860 nothing that I
01:01:11.540 could imagine
01:01:12.040 that they would
01:01:12.900 surface about
01:01:14.420 me that I
01:01:16.440 wouldn't think
01:01:16.840 is funny,
01:01:17.320 ultimately.
01:01:22.000 Could Trump
01:01:22.860 name the
01:01:23.620 FBI a
01:01:24.560 terrorist
01:01:24.840 organization?
01:01:26.440 I don't
01:01:27.160 think he
01:01:27.500 will.
01:01:28.020 Oh, the
01:01:28.300 Russell Brand
01:01:28.860 thing is
01:01:29.800 unscheduled
01:01:31.740 now.
01:01:33.280 So, a few
01:01:35.800 weeks ago I
01:01:36.580 had a
01:01:37.020 Megyn Kelly
01:01:37.680 podcast
01:01:39.060 semi-scheduled,
01:01:41.740 they got
01:01:42.140 unscheduled,
01:01:42.780 and I
01:01:44.000 had a
01:01:44.240 Russell
01:01:44.460 Brand
01:01:44.880 podcast
01:01:46.600 interview that
01:01:47.300 was semi-scheduled,
01:01:50.040 but now it's
01:01:51.180 unscheduled.
01:01:57.780 Why, you
01:01:58.600 ask?
01:01:59.540 I don't know.
01:02:01.900 I don't know.
01:02:02.720 In the case of
01:02:03.500 Russell Brand, he
01:02:04.480 had some
01:02:05.080 schedule
01:02:06.440 uncertainty,
01:02:07.720 and it didn't
01:02:08.720 work with my
01:02:09.440 schedule availability
01:02:10.540 and uncertainty.
01:02:11.840 So, we had a
01:02:12.600 day picked, but I
01:02:13.460 ended up having to
01:02:14.460 schedule that day
01:02:15.160 for something
01:02:15.560 else.
01:02:17.360 So, it
01:02:19.980 might happen.
01:02:20.980 Either one of
01:02:21.740 them could be
01:02:22.180 rescheduled.
01:02:24.580 I'm not sure I'll
01:02:25.560 do either one of
01:02:26.360 them, though.
01:02:29.080 See, I made an
01:02:30.200 exception in both
01:02:31.060 cases.
01:02:33.040 I've been not
01:02:34.080 doing, I don't
01:02:34.700 know if you've
01:02:35.020 noticed, but I
01:02:35.780 haven't been doing
01:02:36.480 interviews for
01:02:37.880 quite some time,
01:02:38.960 and I wasn't
01:02:40.660 going to do
01:02:41.220 any more.
01:02:42.080 Like, I was
01:02:42.460 just going to
01:02:42.840 stop doing
01:02:43.360 them, unless
01:02:45.440 I'm promoting
01:02:46.020 a book or
01:02:46.500 something.
01:02:46.760 If you're
01:02:47.020 promoting a
01:02:47.520 book, then
01:02:47.920 you've got to
01:02:48.760 do what you've
01:02:49.060 got to do.
01:02:50.020 But I only
01:02:51.400 said yes because
01:02:52.160 they were such
01:02:52.760 prominent podcasts,
01:02:55.620 and they're both
01:02:56.060 people that I
01:02:56.680 respect.
01:02:58.120 I'd love to be
01:02:59.620 on Megyn Kelly's
01:03:00.360 show because I
01:03:00.800 think she's
01:03:01.240 amazing at what
01:03:02.000 she does, and
01:03:03.600 Russell Brand as
01:03:04.360 well.
01:03:05.380 So, I made an
01:03:07.320 exception for both
01:03:08.160 of them, and
01:03:08.600 then they both
01:03:09.120 kind of fell
01:03:10.080 through, and
01:03:10.620 they were just
01:03:11.020 work.
01:03:12.500 Because every
01:03:12.940 time you're
01:03:14.320 negotiating to
01:03:15.100 be on, you've
01:03:15.820 got phone calls
01:03:16.680 and emails, and
01:03:17.980 you've got to
01:03:19.200 set aside a
01:03:19.780 time, and then
01:03:20.620 you can't do
01:03:21.180 anything else in
01:03:21.760 that time because
01:03:22.520 you set it
01:03:22.960 aside, and you
01:03:24.980 can't take a
01:03:25.640 vacation unless
01:03:26.680 you cancel, that
01:03:27.840 sort of thing.
01:03:28.940 So, I feel like
01:03:30.620 maybe I won't do
01:03:31.380 either one.
01:03:32.360 What do you
01:03:32.720 think?
01:03:34.640 Is there any
01:03:35.280 reason I should
01:03:35.860 do any podcast?
01:03:37.040 It's not about
01:03:37.580 them.
01:03:38.160 But should I
01:03:38.860 do any
01:03:39.220 podcasts?
01:03:42.400 Is there any
01:03:43.080 reason?
01:03:45.060 Because I'm
01:03:45.880 really just
01:03:46.280 creating
01:03:46.740 entertainment on
01:03:48.260 another channel.
01:03:49.940 I mean, it
01:03:50.500 would, the only
01:03:52.400 thing I could see
01:03:53.160 that would make a
01:03:53.780 difference, that it
01:03:55.880 doesn't sell books,
01:03:57.660 right?
01:03:57.880 So, if you're
01:03:58.320 thinking, oh, people
01:03:59.100 will buy your book,
01:03:59.820 that doesn't work.
01:04:01.800 It works if you
01:04:02.760 have a brand new
01:04:03.480 book.
01:04:04.220 It doesn't work if
01:04:05.380 you're just a person
01:04:06.040 who has books.
01:04:06.620 And it's not
01:04:08.620 going to drive
01:04:09.160 much traffic
01:04:09.900 here, if that's
01:04:12.020 something I even
01:04:12.600 wanted to do.
01:04:13.780 Have you noticed
01:04:14.320 that I don't
01:04:15.080 promote the
01:04:16.620 live stream as
01:04:17.420 much as you'd
01:04:18.300 expect?
01:04:19.600 I mean, I do a
01:04:20.240 little.
01:04:21.440 Have you ever
01:04:21.840 noticed that?
01:04:22.780 Have you ever
01:04:23.180 noticed the
01:04:23.740 conspicuous lack
01:04:25.040 of promotion for
01:04:26.260 the live stream?
01:04:26.980 I just do the
01:04:29.540 basics, right?
01:04:30.240 I tweet it, blah,
01:04:31.880 blah, blah.
01:04:32.260 I mention if
01:04:32.880 somebody asks.
01:04:34.700 But I don't
01:04:35.640 know if I want
01:04:36.180 it bigger.
01:04:38.300 There's something
01:04:38.900 about the size,
01:04:39.980 the size of this
01:04:41.680 interaction that
01:04:45.080 feels right,
01:04:46.820 right?
01:04:47.560 It's, believe it
01:04:48.580 or not, even with
01:04:49.240 this size of
01:04:49.820 audience, it's
01:04:50.260 still intimate.
01:04:52.080 If I had a
01:04:52.920 million listeners,
01:04:54.640 it would just feel
01:04:55.360 different.
01:04:56.980 I don't think
01:04:58.060 the world would
01:04:58.840 be a better
01:04:59.220 place, necessarily.
01:05:01.580 And as you've
01:05:02.580 noted before,
01:05:04.980 Odin of all
01:05:05.480 says the same
01:05:05.980 thing?
01:05:07.000 Yeah, I'm not
01:05:07.640 surprised.
01:05:10.000 Yeah, I don't
01:05:10.760 want to lose the
01:05:11.460 intimacy that
01:05:12.320 makes this
01:05:13.020 something I like
01:05:14.320 to wake up and
01:05:14.960 do.
01:05:16.540 You know, I
01:05:17.500 say this all the
01:05:18.580 time, but I'm
01:05:19.060 not sure how
01:05:19.440 much you believe
01:05:19.980 me.
01:05:21.580 I do this
01:05:22.820 because I enjoy
01:05:25.340 it and I think
01:05:26.480 it's important.
01:05:26.980 now I also
01:05:29.200 monetize it
01:05:30.100 because, you
01:05:30.820 know, why
01:05:31.040 not?
01:05:32.040 I'm doing it
01:05:32.760 anyway.
01:05:33.180 Why wouldn't I
01:05:33.640 monetize it?
01:05:36.780 But really, at
01:05:37.680 this point, it's
01:05:38.960 about the
01:05:39.440 experience, you
01:05:40.600 know, the
01:05:40.860 shared experience
01:05:41.840 and about doing
01:05:42.780 something useful.
01:05:44.060 So if I can
01:05:44.960 influence the
01:05:45.760 influencers, that's
01:05:47.380 all I need.
01:05:48.640 I don't need
01:05:49.480 10 million
01:05:49.980 viewers.
01:05:51.460 That's not going
01:05:52.140 to help me.
01:05:52.500 You say I
01:05:55.900 could change
01:05:56.400 Russell Brand's
01:05:57.180 mind on some
01:05:57.960 issues?
01:05:59.380 Doubt it.
01:06:01.040 I doubt it.
01:06:03.080 Where do you
01:06:03.780 think we'd
01:06:04.260 disagree?
01:06:06.560 No, I think he
01:06:07.800 has a little bit
01:06:08.440 more fun with
01:06:09.360 maybe some
01:06:10.240 conspiracy theory
01:06:12.940 stuff that I
01:06:16.660 wouldn't disagree
01:06:17.340 with.
01:06:17.780 I just, maybe
01:06:19.800 I wouldn't go
01:06:20.440 as far as he
01:06:21.080 does, but, you
01:06:22.720 know, if it's
01:06:23.560 speculative, there's
01:06:24.640 nothing to disagree
01:06:25.420 with.
01:06:28.060 Have you ever
01:06:28.780 been invited to
01:06:29.700 Bill Maher?
01:06:30.320 I did Bill Maher's
01:06:31.120 show during the
01:06:32.760 first Trump-
01:06:33.720 Clinton election,
01:06:35.300 and on his show,
01:06:36.560 I predicted that
01:06:37.420 Trump would win
01:06:38.260 as did Ann,
01:06:43.220 why am I
01:06:45.300 blanking?
01:06:46.520 Ann Coulter.
01:06:47.100 Ann Coulter also
01:06:48.260 did.
01:06:48.720 She did it
01:06:49.140 before I did.
01:06:50.280 Hers gets all
01:06:50.880 the hits.
01:06:52.420 You know, when
01:06:53.000 they show her
01:06:54.120 predicting that
01:06:54.920 Trump would win
01:06:55.560 and everybody's
01:06:56.080 laughing at her,
01:06:57.840 you know, but
01:06:58.260 they're showing it
01:06:59.280 in the context of
01:07:00.120 she was right
01:07:00.640 after all, they
01:07:01.740 never show mine.
01:07:03.400 I was on his
01:07:04.320 show and I
01:07:04.760 said he'd win,
01:07:06.080 and things got
01:07:07.120 real quiet when I
01:07:07.960 said it, but they
01:07:08.480 didn't laugh,
01:07:09.640 because by the
01:07:10.300 time I was on
01:07:11.060 the show, he
01:07:12.100 had already gained
01:07:12.960 a lot of
01:07:13.340 traction, so they
01:07:15.100 weren't laughing by
01:07:15.920 then.
01:07:17.100 But they got
01:07:17.620 really quiet when
01:07:19.400 I said he's going
01:07:20.060 to win.
01:07:21.060 They got really
01:07:21.720 quiet.
01:07:23.620 Because I think by
01:07:24.440 the time I said
01:07:25.180 it, they were
01:07:25.440 like, oh, really?
01:07:26.640 Maybe.
01:07:33.640 Hold out for
01:07:34.360 Gutfeld.
01:07:35.940 Well, I'll
01:07:36.540 definitely do
01:07:37.140 Greg's show.
01:07:38.260 I mean, I would
01:07:38.640 do Gutfeld just
01:07:40.480 because, for fun,
01:07:42.280 just because I'm
01:07:43.980 friends with him.
01:07:45.540 So that would be
01:07:46.360 fun, I like your
01:07:47.100 show, and I'll
01:07:48.680 probably do that.
01:07:50.380 But I wouldn't
01:07:51.100 count that as
01:07:51.940 like the other
01:07:52.620 podcasts.
01:08:00.300 All right.
01:08:01.900 Let me tell you a
01:08:03.120 strategy that I
01:08:04.120 used that I can
01:08:07.580 now reveal to you,
01:08:08.660 because if I told
01:08:09.600 you before, you
01:08:11.000 would not believe
01:08:11.840 it was a good
01:08:12.660 idea.
01:08:13.660 But now it's
01:08:14.320 obviously a good
01:08:15.100 idea, so I can
01:08:15.800 tell you.
01:08:17.180 Do you remember
01:08:17.880 when I said
01:08:19.520 famously that
01:08:20.600 if Biden got
01:08:23.680 elected, Republicans
01:08:24.640 would be hunted?
01:08:26.680 Anybody remember
01:08:27.320 that?
01:08:28.320 Because it got a
01:08:29.060 lot of pushback.
01:08:31.020 Now, you can see
01:08:32.540 that there's
01:08:33.140 something going
01:08:34.280 on like Republicans
01:08:35.900 being hunted.
01:08:36.860 Now, I'm not a
01:08:38.280 Republican, as you
01:08:39.200 know.
01:08:40.940 I'm not even
01:08:41.740 conservative.
01:08:43.600 But I'm lumped
01:08:44.880 into that group by
01:08:46.320 everybody who's, you
01:08:47.920 know, on the left.
01:08:48.980 So they would assume
01:08:50.000 I'm in the same
01:08:50.520 group.
01:08:51.420 Now, given that I
01:08:53.480 could be in that
01:08:54.200 group of targeted
01:08:55.120 people, what did
01:08:57.980 it buy me to say
01:08:59.920 publicly that
01:09:00.720 Republicans would be
01:09:01.760 hunted?
01:09:03.040 Go.
01:09:03.380 Well, what did
01:09:05.980 I do strategically
01:09:07.340 that protected
01:09:09.360 me?
01:09:13.080 So here's the
01:09:14.060 thing.
01:09:15.260 If you're the
01:09:16.100 person who became
01:09:16.880 famous by saying
01:09:17.900 Republicans would
01:09:19.340 be hunted, they
01:09:21.440 have to do you
01:09:22.320 last.
01:09:24.220 You get that?
01:09:25.880 Because I'm the
01:09:26.740 most famous person
01:09:27.920 for saying that we
01:09:28.880 would be targeted.
01:09:31.440 If they targeted
01:09:33.100 me first, then
01:09:35.360 they would prove
01:09:35.940 I'm right.
01:09:37.420 Right?
01:09:38.300 That's the last
01:09:39.100 thing they want to
01:09:39.640 do.
01:09:40.660 So by being the
01:09:41.740 most vocal person
01:09:43.100 about people on
01:09:44.120 the right or
01:09:44.960 associated with the
01:09:45.840 right being
01:09:46.900 targeted, I
01:09:48.460 largely guaranteed
01:09:49.280 that they'd do me
01:09:50.080 last.
01:09:51.580 Oh, they're still
01:09:52.100 going to do me.
01:09:53.180 They're going to
01:09:53.600 take me out.
01:09:54.420 I'm pretty sure of
01:09:55.260 it.
01:09:55.920 I think they'll at
01:09:56.900 least take me out
01:09:57.900 economically and
01:09:59.500 influence-wise.
01:10:02.080 But they have to
01:10:03.020 wait.
01:10:04.060 If they do me too
01:10:05.240 soon, it's just
01:10:07.100 too obvious.
01:10:08.960 But if they do me
01:10:09.940 last, then there
01:10:11.300 will be nobody
01:10:11.800 left to say, hey,
01:10:13.200 you got rid of
01:10:13.920 that guy.
01:10:14.960 I'll just be the
01:10:15.900 last one.
01:10:17.880 So I feel like
01:10:19.080 they can't do me
01:10:19.920 too soon.
01:10:21.060 Right?
01:10:22.220 Now, they might
01:10:22.780 wait until, like,
01:10:23.740 the presidential
01:10:24.320 election, because
01:10:25.600 getting rid of me
01:10:26.500 before the midterms
01:10:27.560 would make no
01:10:28.180 difference at all,
01:10:29.520 because I'm not
01:10:30.000 really going to have
01:10:30.520 any effect on
01:10:31.100 the midterms.
01:10:32.140 But would I have
01:10:33.220 any effect on the
01:10:34.020 presidential election?
01:10:36.860 Yes.
01:10:38.820 Well, let me ask
01:10:39.720 you.
01:10:41.900 Forget about the
01:10:42.700 past.
01:10:43.860 Let's just say
01:10:44.500 there's another
01:10:45.240 election.
01:10:47.500 Do you think that
01:10:48.340 I could move the
01:10:49.220 needle on a
01:10:50.260 national election?
01:10:52.500 What do you
01:10:53.120 think?
01:10:54.620 Could I
01:10:55.280 personally move
01:10:56.380 the needle on a
01:10:58.520 national election?
01:10:59.360 And remember,
01:11:00.740 national elections
01:11:01.400 are sort of a
01:11:02.260 2% difference?
01:11:04.200 So if you
01:11:04.800 believe that the
01:11:05.420 election would
01:11:05.960 have been a
01:11:07.060 2% difference
01:11:08.120 no matter what,
01:11:10.400 how comfortable
01:11:11.220 are you knowing
01:11:12.040 that I exist?
01:11:14.260 Well, if you're
01:11:14.980 on my side,
01:11:16.020 meaning that you
01:11:16.660 agree with my
01:11:18.420 notions about
01:11:19.040 stuff, then you're
01:11:20.160 probably comfortable
01:11:20.780 with it.
01:11:21.740 But imagine you
01:11:22.600 were on the
01:11:23.060 left, and you
01:11:24.420 came to believe
01:11:25.080 that I actually
01:11:25.780 could move the
01:11:26.580 election by 2%.
01:11:27.680 You would have
01:11:29.080 to get rid of
01:11:29.560 me.
01:11:30.980 Now, I don't
01:11:31.600 know that they
01:11:32.100 believe that.
01:11:33.660 I don't know that
01:11:34.480 there's anybody who
01:11:35.240 would have the
01:11:35.680 power to take me
01:11:36.600 out who believes
01:11:38.040 I could make any
01:11:38.740 difference.
01:11:40.680 What do you
01:11:41.220 think?
01:11:43.340 Do you think that
01:11:44.180 people on the
01:11:44.680 left think I
01:11:45.460 could make any
01:11:46.020 difference?
01:11:46.400 Because I don't.
01:11:47.600 I think the
01:11:48.060 people on the
01:11:48.480 left would
01:11:49.020 consider me
01:11:49.720 irrelevant.
01:11:51.360 But there
01:11:51.860 might be some
01:11:52.720 people on the
01:11:53.460 left who think
01:11:54.920 differently.
01:11:55.280 I'd change
01:11:58.660 your vote,
01:11:59.220 somebody says.
01:12:00.820 Well, let me
01:12:01.540 ask you here.
01:12:02.300 How many of
01:12:03.040 you changed a
01:12:04.520 vote because of
01:12:05.480 me?
01:12:06.800 How many of
01:12:07.540 you changed your
01:12:08.340 vote to Trump
01:12:09.840 because of
01:12:10.420 something I
01:12:10.980 said?
01:12:12.640 It should be
01:12:13.540 mostly not,
01:12:14.360 right?
01:12:16.320 So I'm seeing
01:12:17.140 some yeses
01:12:17.820 sprinkled in with
01:12:18.800 mostly noes,
01:12:19.720 which is what
01:12:20.220 I'd expect.
01:12:21.260 I'd expect
01:12:21.720 mostly no.
01:12:22.300 But you'll
01:12:26.800 see on both
01:12:27.380 platforms there
01:12:28.280 are yeses.
01:12:30.300 And can you
01:12:30.780 see that even
01:12:32.040 with this
01:12:32.860 unscientific
01:12:34.560 sample, you
01:12:36.220 can tell I
01:12:37.760 moved the
01:12:38.160 needle.
01:12:39.880 Because I'm
01:12:40.560 not sure how
01:12:41.060 many other
01:12:41.460 people could
01:12:41.860 have asked
01:12:42.180 that question
01:12:42.700 and gotten
01:12:43.080 any yeses.
01:12:45.320 If Charlie
01:12:46.200 Kirk asked,
01:12:47.240 hey, did I
01:12:47.740 change your
01:12:48.200 vote, would
01:12:49.320 anybody say
01:12:49.840 yes?
01:12:50.140 no, but
01:12:52.500 Charlie Kirk,
01:12:53.340 you changed
01:12:53.700 my mind.
01:12:54.360 Because he's
01:12:54.780 a very
01:12:55.940 prominent
01:12:57.220 political figure.
01:13:00.340 I feel
01:13:00.860 like,
01:13:03.340 yeah, I
01:13:04.900 mean, Joe
01:13:05.600 Rogan.
01:13:06.100 So Joe
01:13:06.500 Rogan said
01:13:07.180 jokingly, but
01:13:08.800 maybe not
01:13:09.260 jokingly, that
01:13:10.540 you should
01:13:10.840 consider voting
01:13:11.600 Republican if
01:13:12.360 you don't like
01:13:12.820 how things are
01:13:13.300 going.
01:13:14.440 Do you think
01:13:14.940 that Joe
01:13:15.420 Rogan can make
01:13:16.440 people vote
01:13:17.240 Republican?
01:13:18.240 And again,
01:13:18.900 just 2% of
01:13:19.980 him, I'm
01:13:20.340 not talking
01:13:20.720 about most
01:13:21.220 people, you
01:13:22.280 think he
01:13:22.580 can move
01:13:23.100 the needle?
01:13:25.260 I'd say
01:13:25.920 yes.
01:13:26.920 Do you
01:13:27.200 think that
01:13:27.740 Joe Rogan
01:13:29.220 almost got
01:13:30.920 cancelled?
01:13:33.160 Yes.
01:13:34.400 So because
01:13:34.960 he can move
01:13:35.660 the needle,
01:13:36.260 and I
01:13:36.520 believe he
01:13:36.880 can, the
01:13:39.100 attempt to
01:13:39.780 cancel him
01:13:40.260 was pretty
01:13:41.040 aggressive.
01:13:42.220 Pretty
01:13:42.500 aggressive.
01:13:43.620 But apparently
01:13:44.380 it failed.
01:13:45.880 He was
01:13:46.360 already too
01:13:46.920 big to get
01:13:47.480 cancelled.
01:13:48.300 And I
01:13:48.600 think his
01:13:48.920 brand helped
01:13:49.600 him.
01:13:50.460 If your
01:13:51.020 brand is,
01:13:52.800 well, I
01:13:53.660 think he
01:13:54.100 just has a
01:13:54.580 hard-to-cancel
01:13:55.320 brand, because
01:13:57.080 he's willing
01:13:59.460 to go
01:13:59.820 wherever the
01:14:01.320 fun is,
01:14:01.840 basically.
01:14:05.420 They tried
01:14:06.040 to cancel
01:14:06.420 him over
01:14:06.740 Ivermectin,
01:14:07.440 yeah.
01:14:10.720 Elon also
01:14:11.480 said to
01:14:11.960 vote Republican.
01:14:13.380 Yeah, I
01:14:13.700 guess he
01:14:13.960 kind of did,
01:14:14.580 did he?
01:14:14.800 is the
01:14:22.100 favorite
01:14:22.540 rapper
01:14:23.040 thing, what?
01:14:25.060 What about
01:14:25.840 Andrew Tate?
01:14:27.420 I believe
01:14:28.220 he's been
01:14:28.960 disappeared,
01:14:30.240 so you can
01:14:30.760 clean your
01:14:31.240 memory, because
01:14:31.780 you're not
01:14:32.920 going to see
01:14:33.240 much of him
01:14:33.700 again.
01:14:34.720 I think.
01:14:36.480 I think he
01:14:37.380 disappeared.
01:14:38.440 again, I'm
01:14:41.700 opposed to
01:14:43.120 the censoring
01:14:43.760 of Andrew
01:14:44.620 Tate, even
01:14:45.280 though he's
01:14:46.220 no friend
01:14:46.660 of mine.
01:14:48.600 I don't
01:14:49.340 like the
01:14:49.900 censoring,
01:14:51.580 but you
01:14:52.160 have to
01:14:52.500 admit they
01:14:52.940 did a good
01:14:53.400 job, right?
01:14:55.900 The social
01:14:56.640 media platforms
01:14:57.440 just completely
01:14:58.260 erased him,
01:14:59.540 and I think
01:15:00.320 that he can't
01:15:01.040 use payment
01:15:01.760 platforms or
01:15:02.560 anything.
01:15:02.800 like he
01:15:03.580 can't do
01:15:04.000 banking, at
01:15:06.660 least for
01:15:07.060 this kind
01:15:07.840 of business.
01:15:12.600 So he's
01:15:13.420 on Rumble,
01:15:14.200 okay.
01:15:15.780 Being on
01:15:16.260 Rumble is
01:15:17.160 a partial
01:15:20.600 solution.
01:15:26.560 Yeah, what
01:15:27.360 happened to
01:15:27.760 the January
01:15:28.180 6th
01:15:28.660 committee?
01:15:31.320 Yeah.
01:15:32.800 What about
01:15:33.720 the, well,
01:15:35.380 you're too
01:15:35.640 nice,
01:15:36.040 Cassandra.
01:15:37.740 What about
01:15:38.420 the January
01:15:39.080 6th
01:15:39.500 committee?
01:15:40.100 Didn't
01:15:40.360 work out?
01:15:43.060 Apparently
01:15:43.540 that didn't
01:15:44.000 work out.
01:15:45.260 So they
01:15:45.640 got to go
01:15:46.000 to the,
01:15:46.520 you know,
01:15:47.500 the Trump
01:15:47.920 security boxes.
01:15:53.240 All right.
01:15:54.520 Yeah, what
01:15:55.140 about the
01:15:55.520 Durham report?
01:15:59.400 Amazing.
01:16:02.800 You missed
01:16:09.000 clipping out
01:16:09.640 voice clone
01:16:10.420 permission.
01:16:11.300 No, I
01:16:11.560 deleted the
01:16:12.280 hot tub video.
01:16:20.580 All right.
01:16:22.300 Did they
01:16:22.920 find the
01:16:23.360 person who
01:16:23.780 leaked the
01:16:24.480 leaked row at
01:16:25.980 the Supreme
01:16:26.420 Court?
01:16:26.660 I doubt
01:16:27.100 it.
01:16:35.720 Can you
01:16:36.300 reframe
01:16:36.720 common sense?
01:16:37.620 I don't
01:16:37.880 know why.
01:16:39.860 I mean, I've
01:16:40.300 said in my
01:16:40.840 books that
01:16:41.380 common sense
01:16:42.000 is an
01:16:42.360 illusion.
01:16:43.680 There's no
01:16:44.200 such thing as
01:16:44.780 common sense.
01:16:48.400 Common sense
01:16:49.080 is what you
01:16:49.560 say when you
01:16:50.060 don't have a
01:16:50.500 reason.
01:16:51.440 You know
01:16:51.800 that, right?
01:16:52.200 You say
01:16:54.180 it's common
01:16:54.620 sense when
01:16:56.020 you don't
01:16:56.280 have a
01:16:56.540 reason.
01:17:02.200 Trump for
01:17:02.820 Speaker of the
01:17:03.360 House, I
01:17:04.140 mean, that's
01:17:04.680 a clever idea
01:17:05.480 because he
01:17:05.860 could be
01:17:06.300 Speaker of the
01:17:06.940 House, but
01:17:07.800 it just
01:17:08.500 doesn't fit
01:17:08.940 his personality.
01:17:18.260 Dow is way
01:17:18.980 down again
01:17:19.380 today.
01:17:20.360 Stocks are
01:17:20.840 down.
01:17:22.200 Will he
01:17:23.500 take your
01:17:23.880 advice, who?
01:17:30.460 Fairness is
01:17:31.220 common sense,
01:17:31.960 right?
01:17:32.180 And fairness
01:17:32.560 is an
01:17:33.000 illusion.
01:17:36.840 All right.
01:17:41.840 Do you
01:17:42.480 mean everything
01:17:42.920 is fixed
01:17:43.500 since the
01:17:43.940 origin of
01:17:44.360 the universe?
01:17:45.680 Yeah, the
01:17:46.280 argument for
01:17:47.120 no free
01:17:47.660 will doesn't
01:17:48.880 mean that
01:17:49.280 everything is
01:17:49.840 fixed since
01:17:50.860 the universe.
01:17:51.520 it just
01:17:51.920 means that
01:17:52.540 even though
01:17:54.160 some things
01:17:54.660 might be
01:17:55.060 random,
01:17:57.480 it just
01:17:58.520 means you
01:17:58.800 couldn't
01:17:59.000 predict
01:17:59.300 them.
01:18:01.540 Anyway,
01:18:02.160 that's
01:18:02.380 boring.
01:18:09.740 Can
01:18:10.280 DeSantis
01:18:10.740 be both
01:18:11.460 VP and
01:18:12.080 Florida
01:18:12.380 governor?
01:18:12.780 No.
01:18:13.360 how low
01:18:17.420 will crypto
01:18:18.040 go?
01:18:19.540 Well,
01:18:20.360 didn't
01:18:20.780 everybody
01:18:21.280 assume that
01:18:22.080 most
01:18:22.520 crypto
01:18:22.940 would go
01:18:23.340 to zero?
01:18:25.540 I mean,
01:18:26.100 everybody
01:18:26.620 believed that,
01:18:27.320 right?
01:18:27.780 So the
01:18:28.240 question is,
01:18:28.780 would there
01:18:29.020 be any
01:18:29.480 that did
01:18:29.920 not go
01:18:30.300 to zero?
01:18:31.140 Would there
01:18:31.560 be any
01:18:31.860 winners?
01:18:33.540 I think
01:18:34.380 Bitcoin will
01:18:35.060 have value.
01:18:35.640 I don't know
01:18:37.160 what else will,
01:18:37.880 but I think
01:18:38.380 Bitcoin will
01:18:39.040 last a while.
01:18:40.260 will Trump
01:18:47.860 run if the
01:18:48.600 House and
01:18:48.980 Senate don't
01:18:49.520 flip?
01:18:49.880 Oh,
01:18:50.020 that's a
01:18:50.280 good question.
01:18:54.100 Would you
01:18:54.640 mind to
01:18:54.960 share the
01:18:55.420 day that
01:18:55.940 Justin
01:18:57.000 died?
01:19:00.100 Not
01:19:00.540 really.
01:19:02.240 I appreciate
01:19:02.980 that you
01:19:03.540 would like to
01:19:03.940 pray for him,
01:19:05.300 but no,
01:19:05.800 I don't want
01:19:06.120 to share
01:19:06.880 that.
01:19:10.260 Nassim
01:19:14.140 Taleb
01:19:14.520 predicted the
01:19:15.380 doom of
01:19:15.820 crypto when
01:19:16.600 it was at
01:19:16.960 his highest.
01:19:18.100 Well,
01:19:19.080 Taleb is
01:19:19.620 really good
01:19:20.140 at getting
01:19:23.400 famous for
01:19:24.100 saying things
01:19:24.620 that are
01:19:24.860 really obvious.
01:19:29.840 I'm not
01:19:30.480 sure where
01:19:30.980 he became
01:19:31.560 an intellectual
01:19:32.440 because the
01:19:33.200 things he's
01:19:33.620 most famous
01:19:34.500 for are just
01:19:35.120 the most
01:19:35.460 obvious things.
01:19:36.880 Now,
01:19:37.180 it could be
01:19:37.640 that they're
01:19:38.020 obvious because
01:19:38.800 he said
01:19:39.240 them.
01:19:40.260 like the
01:19:41.160 black swan
01:19:42.060 idea.
01:19:43.880 I think
01:19:44.520 people knew
01:19:45.300 that there
01:19:46.980 would be
01:19:47.300 big shocks
01:19:48.060 that made
01:19:48.860 most of
01:19:49.300 the difference.
01:19:50.600 I'm not
01:19:50.880 sure he
01:19:51.160 added too
01:19:51.720 much to
01:19:52.200 that,
01:19:53.060 but it's
01:19:53.480 a good
01:19:53.720 concept.
01:19:58.880 The
01:19:59.400 railroads
01:19:59.840 might strike?
01:20:00.680 Oh,
01:20:00.840 great.
01:20:02.560 Read his
01:20:03.040 books?
01:20:03.520 It's different
01:20:03.920 than you
01:20:04.140 think.
01:20:04.360 I've tried
01:20:04.680 to read
01:20:04.940 his writing.
01:20:05.640 It's
01:20:05.980 unreadable.
01:20:07.420 It's
01:20:07.600 almost
01:20:07.820 impenetrable.
01:20:10.260 Do
01:20:14.520 ideas
01:20:15.020 exist?
01:20:15.960 Interesting.
01:20:20.180 Yeah,
01:20:20.540 Taleb is
01:20:21.040 well-respected
01:20:21.740 at the
01:20:22.140 highest levels
01:20:23.180 of finance.
01:20:25.940 By
01:20:26.680 everybody?
01:20:28.360 I don't
01:20:28.720 know.
01:20:28.900 check the
01:20:37.920 most recent
01:20:38.440 video of
01:20:39.760 Satoshi
01:20:40.580 endorsing
01:20:41.680 that.
01:20:45.180 Do you
01:20:45.820 think it's
01:20:46.120 worth reading
01:20:46.680 the great
01:20:47.180 books of
01:20:47.840 the Western
01:20:48.320 world?
01:20:49.000 Nope.
01:20:49.460 I don't.
01:21:00.360 An interview
01:21:01.400 with
01:21:01.760 Naval.
01:21:06.340 People
01:21:07.100 on my
01:21:07.360 own are
01:21:07.680 trying to
01:21:08.000 best
01:21:08.240 back
01:21:08.520 on this.
01:21:10.360 Oh,
01:21:10.900 interesting.
01:21:11.920 So here's
01:21:12.560 a comment
01:21:13.180 on YouTube.
01:21:14.940 It says,
01:21:15.440 I'm a
01:21:15.760 black man,
01:21:16.480 first-time
01:21:16.860 listener,
01:21:17.380 and I
01:21:17.560 have to
01:21:17.820 acknowledge
01:21:18.200 how people
01:21:18.660 in my
01:21:19.020 community
01:21:19.420 are trying
01:21:20.380 the best
01:21:20.840 to backtrack
01:21:22.100 from their
01:21:22.500 support of
01:21:23.000 this
01:21:23.180 administration.
01:21:24.220 Everyone is
01:21:24.700 silent now.
01:21:27.420 Yeah.
01:21:28.240 I think
01:21:28.640 that's,
01:21:29.640 in a way,
01:21:30.220 that could
01:21:30.480 be the
01:21:30.720 biggest story
01:21:31.400 of 2024.
01:21:33.500 I think
01:21:34.620 if Trump
01:21:35.180 tried hard
01:21:37.080 to get
01:21:37.420 the black
01:21:37.820 vote,
01:21:38.900 I think
01:21:39.620 it would
01:21:40.540 be historic.
01:21:41.080 I believe
01:21:43.120 the black
01:21:43.600 vote is
01:21:44.120 completely
01:21:44.800 available
01:21:45.380 for a
01:21:46.480 Republican
01:21:46.920 who just
01:21:47.400 tries.
01:21:48.640 Just try.
01:21:50.200 Just put
01:21:51.140 a serious
01:21:52.120 effort into
01:21:52.800 it.
01:21:53.480 In a
01:21:54.020 Republican
01:21:54.360 way,
01:21:54.800 you don't
01:21:55.120 have to
01:21:55.400 become a
01:21:55.780 Democrat,
01:21:56.600 but just
01:21:56.880 do it
01:21:57.140 in a
01:21:57.860 Republican
01:21:58.280 way.
01:22:00.900 I think
01:22:01.780 it's just
01:22:02.240 a gigantic,
01:22:04.040 gigantic
01:22:04.860 possibility
01:22:07.020 of a
01:22:07.500 shift.
01:22:07.780 The
01:22:11.120 Latinos
01:22:11.720 apparently
01:22:12.260 are coming
01:22:12.740 along for
01:22:13.280 free.
01:22:15.740 You know,
01:22:16.700 I'm trying to
01:22:17.640 think about
01:22:18.100 how many
01:22:18.700 people I
01:22:21.180 know were
01:22:21.880 born in,
01:22:23.880 let's say,
01:22:24.580 Mexico or
01:22:25.360 Central America
01:22:26.200 that I know
01:22:27.580 today,
01:22:28.760 and how many
01:22:29.340 of them I
01:22:29.760 would describe
01:22:30.300 as, like,
01:22:31.440 woke.
01:22:32.780 The answer
01:22:33.220 is none.
01:22:34.420 None.
01:22:35.800 I'm not sure
01:22:36.680 that they're
01:22:37.080 Republican,
01:22:37.780 I don't
01:22:38.360 think they
01:22:38.680 would identify
01:22:39.240 that way,
01:22:40.400 but if you
01:22:40.960 looked at,
01:22:42.700 let's say,
01:22:43.940 their philosophies
01:22:46.560 about things,
01:22:48.560 it maps
01:22:49.500 pretty close
01:22:50.200 to sort of
01:22:50.740 a Catholic
01:22:51.340 sensibility,
01:22:53.520 and so it
01:22:53.860 gets pretty,
01:22:54.560 pretty close
01:22:55.060 to a
01:22:55.340 Republican.
01:22:56.860 And you
01:22:57.480 have a
01:22:58.160 group of
01:22:58.580 people whose,
01:23:00.880 I would
01:23:01.920 say,
01:23:02.300 their view
01:23:03.900 of life
01:23:04.500 is work
01:23:05.940 first.
01:23:07.780 Am I
01:23:08.240 wrong?
01:23:08.860 The people
01:23:09.300 who come
01:23:09.600 to America,
01:23:10.800 most of
01:23:11.600 them,
01:23:12.460 the ones
01:23:12.860 that are
01:23:13.060 coming
01:23:13.300 illegally
01:23:13.700 across the
01:23:14.200 border,
01:23:15.120 it's work
01:23:16.260 first.
01:23:17.700 They're
01:23:18.140 putting work
01:23:18.820 above comfort,
01:23:21.700 country,
01:23:23.380 being near
01:23:24.000 their family,
01:23:26.080 work first.
01:23:27.940 Now,
01:23:28.360 if you're a
01:23:28.860 Republican and
01:23:29.760 you see
01:23:30.120 somebody who
01:23:30.640 is work
01:23:31.300 first,
01:23:32.920 you don't
01:23:33.760 hate them.
01:23:34.200 you do
01:23:36.820 not hate
01:23:37.240 them.
01:23:38.260 You
01:23:38.500 respect
01:23:39.140 that.
01:23:40.400 Now,
01:23:40.840 you might
01:23:41.240 say,
01:23:41.640 I wish you
01:23:41.960 could spend
01:23:42.220 more time
01:23:42.580 in your
01:23:42.800 family,
01:23:43.440 that'd be
01:23:43.820 great.
01:23:44.560 But these
01:23:45.300 are people
01:23:45.780 who are
01:23:46.260 taking the
01:23:46.820 hard choices,
01:23:48.260 and they're
01:23:48.580 doing it for
01:23:49.160 their family
01:23:49.680 and for the
01:23:50.300 future.
01:23:51.140 So they're
01:23:51.420 very future
01:23:52.280 oriented,
01:23:53.520 they've
01:23:53.880 connected what
01:23:54.640 they do
01:23:55.040 today to
01:23:56.200 what the
01:23:56.540 future will
01:23:57.360 bring them.
01:23:58.760 It looks
01:23:59.300 so Republican
01:23:59.940 to me.
01:24:00.900 I mean,
01:24:01.140 it looks
01:24:01.380 super Republican.
01:24:02.300 And like
01:24:05.020 I said,
01:24:05.320 they're not
01:24:05.680 woke.
01:24:06.960 They're not
01:24:07.460 dealing with
01:24:08.120 you used
01:24:08.560 the wrong
01:24:08.960 word.
01:24:10.220 They don't
01:24:10.520 care about
01:24:10.920 any of
01:24:11.140 that.
01:24:12.700 So I'd
01:24:14.040 be amazed
01:24:14.880 if they
01:24:16.000 are not
01:24:16.740 mostly
01:24:17.320 Republican
01:24:17.880 in the
01:24:18.360 future.
01:24:19.380 You're
01:24:19.680 already
01:24:19.880 seeing some
01:24:20.420 shift.
01:24:21.420 But if
01:24:22.020 the Republicans
01:24:22.580 just tried
01:24:23.180 a little
01:24:23.680 bit,
01:24:24.860 a little
01:24:25.560 bit,
01:24:26.680 they could
01:24:27.060 just take
01:24:27.440 a huge
01:24:27.900 chunk of
01:24:28.520 that.
01:24:28.660 And by
01:24:32.520 the way,
01:24:33.080 Trump could
01:24:33.700 just say
01:24:34.060 what I
01:24:34.380 said.
01:24:37.340 You know,
01:24:37.980 the fact
01:24:38.480 that we're
01:24:38.800 trying to
01:24:39.200 keep out
01:24:39.740 people who
01:24:40.420 put work
01:24:41.100 first,
01:24:42.700 you really
01:24:43.460 have to
01:24:43.760 ask yourself,
01:24:44.980 especially
01:24:45.540 when our
01:24:46.200 biggest problem
01:24:46.840 is a
01:24:47.360 collapsing
01:24:47.800 population.
01:24:51.340 According to
01:24:51.960 Elon Musk
01:24:52.620 and a lot
01:24:52.980 of smart
01:24:53.300 people,
01:24:53.780 and it's
01:24:54.000 my opinion
01:24:54.480 as well,
01:24:55.140 we have
01:24:55.640 more risk
01:24:56.240 from a
01:24:56.700 collapsing
01:24:57.140 population
01:24:57.880 than anything
01:24:58.320 else.
01:24:59.400 And here
01:24:59.700 we have
01:25:00.220 millions
01:25:01.420 of people
01:25:02.080 who have
01:25:03.860 a Catholic
01:25:04.740 sensibility,
01:25:06.320 work first,
01:25:08.620 sacrifice to
01:25:09.420 work,
01:25:09.980 because that
01:25:10.660 will build
01:25:10.980 us a
01:25:11.300 future.
01:25:12.340 You don't
01:25:12.720 want those
01:25:13.140 people in
01:25:13.540 your country?
01:25:17.420 If you
01:25:18.100 said,
01:25:18.540 who do you
01:25:18.860 want in
01:25:19.120 your country?
01:25:19.660 I'd say
01:25:20.120 people who
01:25:21.360 have some
01:25:21.980 kind of
01:25:22.300 moral
01:25:22.740 background,
01:25:25.620 and they
01:25:26.740 planned
01:25:27.320 a reasonable
01:25:28.940 plan for
01:25:29.600 their future,
01:25:30.620 and they
01:25:31.300 work really
01:25:31.960 hard to
01:25:32.320 make it
01:25:32.600 happen for
01:25:33.100 the next
01:25:33.420 generation,
01:25:34.400 you're
01:25:34.660 telling me
01:25:35.000 I don't
01:25:35.260 want those
01:25:35.640 people in
01:25:36.060 my country?
01:25:37.620 I want
01:25:38.460 lots of
01:25:38.960 them in
01:25:39.220 my country.
01:25:40.340 Lots of
01:25:40.920 them.
01:25:41.880 More the
01:25:42.460 better.
01:25:43.800 Now,
01:25:44.260 legally,
01:25:44.820 of course.
01:25:45.980 Legally,
01:25:46.580 of course.
01:25:47.900 In fact,
01:25:48.480 here's how I
01:25:49.000 would handle
01:25:49.440 all of
01:25:49.880 immigration.
01:25:50.320 I heard a
01:25:53.680 lot of
01:25:53.860 people
01:25:54.020 complaining
01:25:54.520 about giving
01:25:55.020 illegal
01:25:56.100 immigrants
01:25:56.580 free
01:25:56.920 phones.
01:25:58.260 I'd
01:25:58.700 probably
01:25:58.920 give them
01:25:59.220 free
01:25:59.420 phones.
01:26:00.400 You know
01:26:00.680 why?
01:26:02.140 Because
01:26:02.580 they'll
01:26:02.800 take them
01:26:03.200 and you
01:26:03.440 can track
01:26:03.840 them.
01:26:04.900 You can
01:26:05.480 track them.
01:26:06.400 If you
01:26:06.800 give them
01:26:07.000 a phone,
01:26:07.420 you control
01:26:07.860 them.
01:26:09.260 So I
01:26:09.820 would want
01:26:10.180 to control
01:26:10.600 them.
01:26:11.820 And one
01:26:12.380 way you
01:26:12.760 could game
01:26:13.780 the whole
01:26:14.140 system is
01:26:14.700 just say,
01:26:15.180 let everybody
01:26:15.660 in.
01:26:16.240 Just give
01:26:16.660 them a
01:26:16.900 phone.
01:26:18.200 If we
01:26:18.780 find you
01:26:19.260 without
01:26:19.500 your
01:26:19.720 phone,
01:26:20.320 we're
01:26:21.100 going
01:26:21.220 to
01:26:21.300 arrest
01:26:21.560 you.
01:26:24.960 And just
01:26:25.560 say,
01:26:26.040 you can
01:26:26.420 be here
01:26:26.880 as long
01:26:27.280 as you
01:26:27.500 keep
01:26:27.700 your
01:26:27.880 phone.
01:26:29.460 And if
01:26:29.880 you lose
01:26:30.240 your
01:26:30.400 phone,
01:26:30.700 we'll
01:26:30.880 replace
01:26:31.340 it or
01:26:31.580 whatever,
01:26:32.240 if it
01:26:32.500 breaks.
01:26:33.360 But
01:26:33.560 basically,
01:26:35.100 if you
01:26:35.700 get separated
01:26:36.360 from your
01:26:36.840 phone,
01:26:37.540 like,
01:26:37.900 too far,
01:26:38.780 for too
01:26:39.160 long,
01:26:39.760 it's not
01:26:40.140 like if
01:26:40.500 you forgot
01:26:40.900 it somewhere,
01:26:41.760 but if
01:26:42.000 you try
01:26:42.820 to get
01:26:43.320 rid of
01:26:43.580 your
01:26:43.720 phone and
01:26:44.200 get a
01:26:44.440 regular
01:26:44.680 phone,
01:26:45.460 well,
01:26:45.720 you go
01:26:45.920 to jail
01:26:46.300 or you
01:26:47.320 get
01:26:47.440 deported.
01:26:48.840 But as
01:26:49.160 long as
01:26:49.440 we can
01:26:49.720 keep an
01:26:50.060 eye on
01:26:50.440 you,
01:26:51.100 because
01:26:51.360 here's what
01:26:52.080 you could
01:26:52.360 do if
01:26:52.640 you had
01:26:52.860 an app.
01:26:54.260 So you
01:26:54.560 need an
01:26:54.920 immigration
01:26:55.360 app.
01:26:56.780 Everybody
01:26:57.100 who comes
01:26:57.520 here illegally
01:26:58.280 gets one
01:26:58.820 of these
01:26:59.040 phones.
01:27:00.300 Now remember,
01:27:01.160 if the
01:27:02.020 government is
01:27:02.600 buying them,
01:27:03.100 we're not
01:27:03.320 buying iPhones.
01:27:05.300 You're not
01:27:05.960 buying the
01:27:06.440 $1,200
01:27:06.840 phone.
01:27:07.820 It's probably
01:27:08.240 the $300
01:27:10.320 phone,
01:27:11.060 I don't
01:27:11.240 know,
01:27:11.500 something
01:27:11.720 like that,
01:27:12.420 if you
01:27:12.720 get them
01:27:12.920 in bulk.
01:27:15.380 And then
01:27:15.900 you put
01:27:16.240 on it
01:27:16.660 an app
01:27:17.620 that allows
01:27:18.320 them to
01:27:19.060 get hired
01:27:20.580 by companies
01:27:22.660 that need
01:27:23.040 the labor
01:27:23.400 and also
01:27:24.300 to get
01:27:24.660 paid
01:27:25.000 through the
01:27:25.500 app
01:27:25.720 only.
01:27:27.460 So you'd
01:27:28.180 only be
01:27:28.780 paid through
01:27:29.180 the app.
01:27:29.620 You couldn't
01:27:29.920 get paid
01:27:30.280 any other
01:27:30.700 way.
01:27:31.300 And then
01:27:31.480 the app
01:27:31.820 would be
01:27:32.100 connected
01:27:32.460 to something
01:27:33.180 or it
01:27:33.620 didn't have
01:27:33.940 to be.
01:27:34.160 I don't
01:27:38.400 know,
01:27:38.780 I think
01:27:39.540 you could
01:27:39.940 just
01:27:40.680 literally
01:27:41.100 open the
01:27:41.620 border
01:27:41.840 if you
01:27:42.140 gave
01:27:42.320 everybody
01:27:42.640 a phone
01:27:43.020 because
01:27:44.400 the
01:27:44.680 people
01:27:44.940 who
01:27:45.100 were
01:27:45.240 doing
01:27:45.460 bad
01:27:45.780 stuff,
01:27:46.200 you'd
01:27:46.340 find
01:27:46.580 them.
01:27:50.120 Now,
01:27:50.620 of course,
01:27:51.200 the criminals
01:27:51.740 would get
01:27:52.300 in that
01:27:53.720 way,
01:27:54.280 but I
01:27:54.680 feel like
01:27:55.020 they're
01:27:55.160 getting
01:27:55.380 in anyway.
01:27:57.340 If
01:27:57.780 there's
01:27:57.980 nothing
01:27:58.200 you can
01:27:58.580 do
01:27:58.740 about
01:27:58.920 the
01:27:59.080 criminals
01:27:59.400 getting
01:27:59.680 in,
01:27:59.980 maybe
01:28:00.160 you
01:28:00.340 just
01:28:00.540 have
01:28:01.840 to
01:28:02.100 do
01:28:02.880 something
01:28:03.180 else.
01:28:04.160 All right,
01:28:06.120 just an
01:28:07.500 idea.
01:28:07.940 I don't
01:28:08.180 think it's
01:28:08.520 necessarily
01:28:08.920 the best
01:28:09.300 idea in
01:28:09.640 the world,
01:28:10.000 but I'll
01:28:10.180 put it
01:28:10.400 out there.
01:28:11.940 Warren
01:28:12.160 Buffett
01:28:12.460 is 92
01:28:13.040 today.
01:28:14.780 Boy,
01:28:15.400 you know,
01:28:15.620 about
01:28:15.880 probably
01:28:17.880 20 years
01:28:18.860 ago,
01:28:19.140 I sold
01:28:19.520 my
01:28:20.280 Berkshire
01:28:21.720 Hathaway
01:28:22.200 stock
01:28:22.660 because I
01:28:23.780 thought
01:28:24.000 Warren
01:28:24.360 Buffett
01:28:24.680 couldn't
01:28:24.960 last that
01:28:25.400 long.
01:28:26.260 I thought
01:28:26.840 that when
01:28:27.100 he dies,
01:28:27.640 the stock
01:28:28.020 will tank,
01:28:29.060 even though
01:28:29.540 there's no
01:28:29.840 reason for
01:28:30.380 it because
01:28:30.820 the company
01:28:31.580 would be
01:28:32.300 solid.
01:28:32.640 But I
01:28:34.140 thought
01:28:34.340 emotionally
01:28:34.920 that stock
01:28:35.620 would tank
01:28:36.040 when he
01:28:36.340 died.
01:28:36.720 Now he's
01:28:36.940 92 and
01:28:37.600 he's still
01:28:37.900 going strong.
01:28:40.160 So I
01:28:40.800 guessed
01:28:41.000 wrong.
01:28:43.380 How do
01:28:43.680 you feel
01:28:44.140 about
01:28:44.440 surgically
01:28:45.120 transitioning
01:28:45.920 minors?
01:28:47.000 Really?
01:28:47.340 Really?
01:28:49.320 Really?
01:28:52.600 What do
01:28:53.240 you think I
01:28:53.700 feel about
01:28:54.180 that?
01:28:55.560 Surgically
01:28:56.080 transitioning
01:28:57.340 minors?
01:28:58.960 Like,
01:28:59.240 just guess.
01:29:00.060 what do
01:29:01.780 you think
01:29:02.020 my opinion
01:29:02.460 on that
01:29:02.880 is?
01:29:04.680 Because
01:29:05.240 that's not
01:29:05.640 about
01:29:05.900 LGBTQ.
01:29:07.820 I'm very
01:29:08.600 pro-LGBTQ,
01:29:10.160 but that's
01:29:10.920 not an
01:29:11.180 LGBTQ
01:29:11.660 question.
01:29:13.900 That's a
01:29:14.420 child question.
01:29:17.440 It has more
01:29:18.040 to do with
01:29:18.620 how do you
01:29:19.180 handle children
01:29:20.140 going through
01:29:20.960 phases and
01:29:22.640 stuff.
01:29:23.700 Yeah.
01:29:24.520 No,
01:29:25.040 that's
01:29:25.280 obviously
01:29:25.840 wrong.
01:29:26.260 I won't
01:29:28.800 even have
01:29:29.120 an argument
01:29:29.540 with somebody
01:29:30.120 who says
01:29:30.440 you should
01:29:30.900 transition
01:29:32.640 children.
01:29:35.440 To me,
01:29:36.480 that's
01:29:36.680 as soon
01:29:39.340 as you
01:29:39.700 say the
01:29:40.540 statement
01:29:40.960 somebody
01:29:42.300 wants to
01:29:42.980 chemically
01:29:43.580 transition
01:29:44.260 children to
01:29:45.140 another
01:29:45.420 gender,
01:29:46.960 I don't
01:29:48.240 even want
01:29:48.600 to have a
01:29:48.900 debate about
01:29:49.400 that.
01:29:50.280 That's
01:29:50.560 just no.
01:29:52.320 No.
01:29:54.080 Right?
01:29:54.640 There's
01:29:56.000 no details.
01:29:57.300 No.
01:29:58.600 Nope.
01:29:59.160 Nope.
01:29:59.660 Nope.
01:30:00.040 Nope.
01:30:00.380 Nope.
01:30:00.540 Nope.
01:30:04.720 You know,
01:30:11.500 people who
01:30:11.940 argue it
01:30:12.340 online,
01:30:13.000 well,
01:30:13.320 let me tell
01:30:14.160 you this.
01:30:16.000 Are there
01:30:16.740 people that
01:30:17.480 you absolutely
01:30:18.400 can tell
01:30:19.300 are not
01:30:22.200 going to be
01:30:22.540 happy in the
01:30:23.220 gender they're
01:30:23.720 in?
01:30:23.860 And can
01:30:24.320 you tell
01:30:24.780 if they're
01:30:25.280 13?
01:30:26.660 What do
01:30:26.960 you think?
01:30:27.840 Do you
01:30:28.120 think there
01:30:28.460 are some
01:30:28.860 people that
01:30:30.640 absolutely
01:30:31.500 would benefit
01:30:32.560 from the
01:30:33.680 transition?
01:30:35.280 Some.
01:30:37.500 No?
01:30:40.700 Nobody?
01:30:42.880 Here's my
01:30:43.660 view.
01:30:44.740 I believe
01:30:45.320 absolutely
01:30:46.320 there are
01:30:47.680 some people
01:30:48.200 who would
01:30:48.540 benefit from
01:30:49.340 the transition
01:30:50.280 as children.
01:30:51.000 I do.
01:30:53.920 Here's the
01:30:54.480 problem.
01:30:55.680 You don't
01:30:56.060 know which
01:30:56.380 ones they
01:30:56.780 are.
01:30:58.400 You don't
01:30:58.900 know which
01:30:59.280 ones they
01:30:59.700 are.
01:31:00.500 So it
01:31:00.820 has to be
01:31:01.360 a solid
01:31:01.940 no,
01:31:02.460 no way,
01:31:03.500 no how,
01:31:04.800 nope,
01:31:05.160 nope,
01:31:05.400 nope.
01:31:05.980 It's
01:31:06.360 exactly the
01:31:07.000 same as
01:31:07.860 statutory
01:31:10.160 rape.
01:31:10.680 Do you
01:31:12.640 think that
01:31:13.120 every 16
01:31:14.580 year old who
01:31:15.360 has sex with
01:31:16.120 somebody who's
01:31:16.620 over 18 is
01:31:18.060 damaged for
01:31:18.820 life?
01:31:20.080 The answer
01:31:20.820 is no,
01:31:22.480 no.
01:31:24.300 But should
01:31:24.800 you therefore
01:31:25.400 make it legal
01:31:26.260 for adults to
01:31:27.060 have sex with
01:31:27.640 children?
01:31:28.280 No,
01:31:29.140 no,
01:31:30.460 because you
01:31:31.020 don't know
01:31:31.400 which ones
01:31:32.060 are going to
01:31:32.900 be perfectly
01:31:33.520 fine and
01:31:34.680 which ones
01:31:35.160 will be
01:31:35.500 damaged for
01:31:36.100 life.
01:31:37.140 So that's
01:31:37.540 just a no,
01:31:39.140 right?
01:31:39.880 If you're
01:31:41.020 dealing with
01:31:41.380 children,
01:31:42.300 there are a
01:31:42.680 lot more
01:31:43.020 situations which
01:31:43.920 are just
01:31:44.300 no.
01:31:45.860 So even
01:31:46.460 if you spot
01:31:47.080 that 13
01:31:47.780 year old
01:31:48.160 where you're
01:31:49.160 positive and
01:31:50.020 all the
01:31:50.340 doctors are
01:31:51.040 positive that
01:31:52.320 this kid would
01:31:52.920 be better with
01:31:53.460 the transition,
01:31:54.880 still no.
01:31:56.580 Still no.
01:31:57.720 Because they
01:31:58.020 can do it
01:31:58.420 later.
01:31:58.860 Just wait a
01:31:59.280 few years,
01:32:00.780 remove all
01:32:01.320 doubt,
01:32:02.740 if that makes
01:32:03.220 sense to me.
01:32:04.480 Because I
01:32:05.060 don't think you
01:32:05.740 want to take
01:32:06.100 the chance of
01:32:06.820 that one
01:32:07.260 person being
01:32:07.900 transitioned who
01:32:08.900 shouldn't have
01:32:09.460 been.
01:32:10.280 That's just
01:32:10.780 way too big
01:32:12.220 a risk,
01:32:13.220 in my view.
01:32:14.880 So no.
01:32:16.320 That's my
01:32:16.780 answer.
01:32:17.080 Even though
01:32:17.900 I will
01:32:18.400 allow,
01:32:19.220 I will
01:32:20.020 allow that
01:32:20.520 that would
01:32:20.860 be a
01:32:21.360 burden on
01:32:21.960 some people.
01:32:23.440 I will
01:32:23.820 allow that
01:32:24.400 there's no
01:32:25.460 100%
01:32:26.000 clean answer.
01:32:27.060 But there
01:32:27.380 is a
01:32:27.620 clean policy.
01:32:29.740 Knowing what
01:32:30.200 to do about
01:32:30.800 it I think
01:32:31.180 is easy.
01:32:32.980 But if you
01:32:33.660 go further
01:32:34.220 and say that
01:32:35.100 will be good
01:32:35.680 for everybody,
01:32:36.480 that's a
01:32:36.820 little too
01:32:37.080 far.
01:32:38.200 You have
01:32:38.760 to accept
01:32:40.040 that somebody
01:32:40.540 is going
01:32:40.820 to pay the
01:32:41.220 price for
01:32:41.600 that.
01:32:44.420 All right.
01:32:45.380 That's all
01:32:45.820 for now.
01:32:46.340 I'll talk
01:32:47.740 to you
01:32:48.020 YouTube
01:32:48.320 tomorrow.
01:32:49.820 Bye for
01:32:50.160 now.
01:32:50.780 Best show
01:32:51.160 you've ever
01:32:51.480 seen.
01:32:52.160 Bye for
01:32:53.160 now.
01:32:53.720 Bye for
01:32:54.160 now.
01:32:54.220 Bye for
01:32:55.160 now.
01:32:55.220 Bye for
01:32:56.160 now.
01:32:56.220 Bye for
01:32:57.160 now.
01:32:57.220 Bye for
01:32:58.160 now.
01:32:58.280 Bye for
01:32:59.160 now.
01:32:59.280 Bye for
01:33:00.120 now.