Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1866 Scott Adams： Election Gullibles vs Election Deniers, Everyone is Acting A Fool Lately

00:00:00.000 Do-do, do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do, la-da-da-da-da, la-pa-pa, la-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa.

00:00:14.940 Good morning, everybody.

00:00:17.320 And aren't you lucky?

00:00:20.620 Yeah.

00:00:21.440 You made it to the best thing that's ever going to happen to you.

00:00:24.320 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and every day is better than the one before, but not

00:00:28.660 as good as tomorrow.

00:00:29.960 Tomorrow's looking really good.

00:00:32.420 How would you like to take it up to levels

00:00:34.240 that humans have never experienced before?

00:00:37.480 You would.

00:00:38.440 And all you need to do that is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:00:40.760 a tank or chalice or stine, a canteen jug or flask,

00:00:43.540 a vessel of any kind.

00:00:45.680 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:48.480 I like coffee.

00:00:50.300 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:53.080 the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:55.860 It's the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:58.500 You can feel it starting already, can't you?

00:01:00.900 It's called The Simultaneous Sip, and it's happening now.

00:01:03.340 Go.

00:01:09.260 Savor it.

00:01:10.980 Savor it.

00:01:12.780 Okay.

00:01:17.760 Well, so Dilbert is still going after ESG.

00:01:23.920 We've got another comic today.

00:01:25.540 So here, Dogbert is talking to just some character

00:01:30.660 who's a head of some business.

00:01:35.660 And the title of the comic is Dogbert's ESG Rating Service.

00:01:40.280 So Dogbert has become an independent rating service for ESG.

00:01:45.520 Those exist, by the way.

00:01:47.240 So if you're a big company,

00:01:48.820 you can pay somebody to go look at

00:01:51.500 how much you're polluting and discriminating,

00:01:54.140 and they'll give you a score.

00:01:56.380 And I thought,

00:01:57.160 what could be a better job for Dogbert

00:01:59.260 than something that's totally subjective?

00:02:04.280 So Dogbert is talking to some CEO who is unnamed.

00:02:08.640 And Dogbert says,

00:02:09.480 your core business involves giving digital lobotomies

00:02:12.380 to other people's children.

00:02:14.840 What business is it?

00:02:16.940 So Dogbert is talking to a CEO, you assume.

00:02:19.580 Your core business involves giving digital lobotomies

00:02:23.220 to other people's children.

00:02:25.540 Right.

00:02:26.860 TikTok.

00:02:29.260 Yeah, but it's not just TikTok, right?

00:02:31.820 It's social media.

00:02:35.200 But then Dogbert says,

00:02:36.700 but you don't pollute as much as you could,

00:02:39.280 and you did ask for my pronoun.

00:02:41.500 So I'm giving you the top ESG rating.

00:02:43.600 And the CEO is looking at it,

00:02:45.740 and he goes,

00:02:45.980 this feels right.

00:02:47.460 And Dogbert's wagging,

00:02:48.680 and he says,

00:02:49.040 I think we're making a difference.

00:02:51.660 Now,

00:02:52.400 this would be the third day

00:02:56.640 of a week of ESG mocking.

00:03:00.880 And I've noticed that the ESG people,

00:03:03.680 the people who care about it,

00:03:05.700 are starting to pick it up and tweet it.

00:03:08.900 Once I get a full week,

00:03:10.380 I'm going to put them all together

00:03:13.460 and publish it as,

00:03:15.040 you know,

00:03:15.280 larger content.

00:03:17.440 And then it's going to be hard,

00:03:19.440 it's going to be hard to avoid seeing it

00:03:21.700 if you're in the ESG business.

00:03:25.280 So,

00:03:26.140 doing that for you 0.99

00:03:26.940 because you asked me to kill ESG. 0.69

00:03:29.280 And I said I'd get it done

00:03:30.520 by the end of the year.

00:03:33.400 So,

00:03:34.160 so we're going to mock it out of existence

00:03:36.740 by the end of the year.

00:03:37.840 We'll see.

00:03:38.680 I don't think it'll be out of existence.

00:03:40.380 I don't mean that.

00:03:41.780 I just mean that it's

00:03:42.900 reputation will go from

00:03:45.140 growing and good to,

00:03:47.460 uh-oh,

00:03:48.940 that's really,

00:03:50.160 that's what you can accomplish.

00:03:51.920 Uh-oh,

00:03:52.900 maybe we shouldn't do this.

00:03:55.440 So look for the,

00:03:56.660 the negative articles on ESG

00:03:59.060 to start popping up.

00:04:01.740 Sometimes you have to go first.

00:04:04.400 So,

00:04:05.020 one of the things that Dilbert does

00:04:06.320 as a comic

00:04:06.940 is it goes first.

00:04:08.420 So I can kind of soften up the room.

00:04:11.560 And then the regular journalists

00:04:13.000 can say,

00:04:13.560 oh,

00:04:13.860 okay,

00:04:14.320 other people are mocking this.

00:04:15.780 I can mock it too.

00:04:17.600 You have to sort of wait

00:04:18.800 for somebody to mock it first

00:04:20.560 before the,

00:04:21.500 the timid people come in.

00:04:26.120 Actually,

00:04:26.740 Wall Street Journal today

00:04:27.660 has a,

00:04:28.180 somebody saying,

00:04:28.860 has a piece saying 0.61

00:04:29.540 ESG is useless and costly.

00:04:31.140 But you would, 0.99

00:04:32.440 you would expect that

00:04:33.380 in an opinion piece

00:04:34.800 in the Wall Street Journal.

00:04:36.780 All right,

00:04:37.440 I,

00:04:37.680 uh,

00:04:38.020 uh,

00:04:39.460 I complained online today

00:04:40.980 because there's an app called

00:04:43.100 YouTube TV,

00:04:45.020 which is different

00:04:45.980 from regular YouTube.

00:04:47.820 So YouTube TV

00:04:49.120 is an app

00:04:50.180 made by YouTube

00:04:50.900 where you can,

00:04:52.000 it's like a cable TV thing

00:04:53.620 except you just use

00:04:54.920 your internet.

00:04:55.360 And so you can see

00:04:56.980 all the regular channels

00:04:58.000 and all the cable channels

00:04:59.160 and it's,

00:05:00.620 and the,

00:05:00.980 the interface is spectacular,

00:05:02.900 by the way.

00:05:04.000 If you,

00:05:04.640 if you're going to watch

00:05:05.440 television,

00:05:07.900 the,

00:05:08.440 uh,

00:05:08.660 YouTube TV

00:05:09.540 has the best,

00:05:10.480 um,

00:05:11.640 best interface

00:05:12.400 you've ever seen.

00:05:13.320 It's just great.

00:05:14.860 But,

00:05:15.500 there's one little oddity

00:05:16.620 I discovered

00:05:17.280 that of all the channels

00:05:19.620 that you could watch,

00:05:21.160 there's one that consistently

00:05:23.180 doesn't work.

00:05:24.300 it glitches

00:05:25.660 or the sound

00:05:26.560 doesn't match the thing

00:05:27.900 or you can't fast forward it

00:05:29.360 or it,

00:05:30.220 or it defaults back

00:05:31.760 to the beginning.

00:05:33.460 A whole bunch

00:05:34.420 of different errors.

00:05:35.480 But there's only one channel.

00:05:37.540 What,

00:05:37.700 what do you think

00:05:38.200 is the one network

00:05:39.960 or channel

00:05:40.600 on all of the channels?

00:05:42.520 What,

00:05:42.720 what do you think

00:05:43.180 is the one that doesn't work?

00:05:45.340 No,

00:05:45.540 not mine.

00:05:46.320 No,

00:05:46.720 because I,

00:05:47.200 I,

00:05:47.540 I'm not on that app.

00:05:49.320 I'm on YouTube,

00:05:51.040 but I'm not on YouTube TV.

00:05:54.300 YouTube TV

00:05:55.360 is just TV.

00:05:57.520 Right,

00:05:57.700 that's just TV.

00:05:58.920 Fox News.

00:06:01.360 Fox News.

00:06:03.200 So I asked

00:06:04.080 other people

00:06:06.120 if they have

00:06:07.400 the same problem.

00:06:09.140 I did a little,

00:06:10.100 and then somebody said,

00:06:11.240 you should do a poll

00:06:11.880 on this.

00:06:12.580 And I said,

00:06:14.020 you're right,

00:06:14.660 I really should do

00:06:15.340 a poll on this.

00:06:17.380 Because YouTube TV

00:06:18.940 did respond to me

00:06:20.120 right away,

00:06:21.020 because I said

00:06:22.020 something on Twitter,

00:06:22.660 and they noticed

00:06:23.880 right away,

00:06:24.460 and they did

00:06:25.080 a real good job

00:06:25.740 of responding.

00:06:27.140 So A plus for

00:06:28.480 responding quickly.

00:06:30.920 And A plus for

00:06:32.080 interface.

00:06:33.600 It's really

00:06:34.420 a well-made product.

00:06:36.380 It really is.

00:06:38.040 But,

00:06:38.280 so whatever's happening

00:06:39.060 with the

00:06:39.800 Fox News channel,

00:06:42.500 we don't know.

00:06:45.200 So that's the

00:06:45.840 open question.

00:06:46.640 But I asked people

00:06:47.420 if they're having

00:06:48.180 a problem,

00:06:48.600 or is it just me?

00:06:49.340 Because YouTube TV

00:06:50.880 reached out and said,

00:06:52.420 maybe you should

00:06:54.320 reload the app.

00:06:56.840 Reload the app.

00:06:58.900 But,

00:06:59.620 it's the same

00:07:01.140 on my Apple TV

00:07:02.100 and my iPad

00:07:03.480 and my old iPhone

00:07:04.920 and my new iPhone

00:07:05.920 that I got this week.

00:07:07.520 Do you think the problem

00:07:08.440 is that reloading the app

00:07:09.700 is going to help

00:07:10.220 that one channel?

00:07:12.320 It's an app that has

00:07:13.360 just one channel

00:07:14.460 with a problem.

00:07:15.120 Just one.

00:07:15.640 And rebooting the app

00:07:17.720 is going to fix

00:07:18.340 just the one channel.

00:07:21.380 Do you think

00:07:22.020 there's any chance

00:07:22.920 that that's going to work?

00:07:25.880 No.

00:07:27.720 So instead,

00:07:28.620 I did a poll

00:07:29.260 and I said,

00:07:30.860 if you use

00:07:31.540 a YouTube TV app,

00:07:33.100 not regular YouTube,

00:07:34.560 make sure you're

00:07:35.360 clear on that,

00:07:36.360 there are different apps.

00:07:37.820 Does the Fox News channel

00:07:39.000 work for you

00:07:39.820 without glitching?

00:07:41.420 Now,

00:07:41.720 if you subtract out

00:07:42.600 the people who just

00:07:43.280 wanted to see the result,

00:07:44.560 which is most of them,

00:07:45.360 because most people

00:07:46.100 don't have this app,

00:07:47.860 it was 16% said,

00:07:50.680 yes, it works, fine.

00:07:52.380 And 12% says

00:07:53.800 it glitches often

00:07:54.920 and always.

00:07:55.420 But remember,

00:07:56.420 those percentages

00:07:57.740 are after you take out

00:07:58.820 the people who just

00:07:59.440 wanted to see the answer.

00:08:01.760 So the 12 and the 16,

00:08:03.120 if you were to treat them

00:08:04.060 as the only ones

00:08:05.520 that mattered,

00:08:06.180 because they're the ones

00:08:06.840 who have the app.

00:08:07.800 Everybody else

00:08:08.400 doesn't even have the app.

00:08:10.200 So if you just look

00:08:11.140 at them,

00:08:11.920 about 12 out of 16,

00:08:14.840 would be

00:08:15.880 three quarters.

00:08:18.520 There are three quarters

00:08:19.400 as many people

00:08:20.160 who can't watch

00:08:21.340 that channel.

00:08:25.800 I mean,

00:08:26.380 that suggests

00:08:26.980 that there is,

00:08:28.540 in fact.

00:08:31.340 Yeah,

00:08:31.760 I'm doing the math wrong,

00:08:32.700 but don't worry about it.

00:08:33.880 The point is,

00:08:34.740 don't worry about the math.

00:08:36.680 The point is

00:08:37.220 that 12 and 16

00:08:38.200 aren't that far apart,

00:08:39.860 meaning that there are

00:08:40.820 a whole bunch of people

00:08:41.640 watching that channel

00:08:42.480 who can't get

00:08:43.280 that one channel

00:08:44.480 to work.

00:08:45.880 Is that a coincidence?

00:08:48.460 Now,

00:08:48.920 I saw a comment

00:08:49.880 from somebody,

00:08:50.640 apparently on Reddit,

00:08:51.600 people had been talking

00:08:52.420 about this as well,

00:08:54.460 and on Reddit,

00:08:55.240 somebody said

00:08:55.900 that somebody

00:08:57.760 at YouTube TV,

00:08:58.940 now this is all

00:08:59.580 low credibility,

00:09:00.960 I don't know

00:09:01.220 if this is true,

00:09:02.500 somebody at YouTube TV

00:09:03.820 suggested it might be

00:09:04.940 the feed

00:09:05.560 coming from Fox News,

00:09:07.840 meaning that

00:09:08.560 they treat everything

00:09:09.440 the same,

00:09:10.020 but if they get

00:09:10.500 a bad feed,

00:09:11.920 what are you going

00:09:12.420 to do?

00:09:13.880 Do you believe that?

00:09:15.320 Do you believe that

00:09:16.140 Fox TV,

00:09:17.460 or Fox News,

00:09:19.260 who appear to be

00:09:20.500 among the most

00:09:21.480 technically capable

00:09:22.640 people around,

00:09:26.380 and yet,

00:09:27.000 and yet they're

00:09:27.860 the only channel,

00:09:29.620 all the other channels

00:09:30.660 can send a clean signal,

00:09:32.840 but it's just the only

00:09:33.600 one that can't.

00:09:35.320 Do you believe that?

00:09:36.380 Do you believe that?

00:09:39.440 Now, other people

00:09:40.840 said that there

00:09:41.480 are other apps,

00:09:42.860 like the Roku app,

00:09:44.400 where they have

00:09:44.900 the same problem,

00:09:46.760 where it seems

00:09:47.320 that Fox News

00:09:48.100 is a problem.

00:09:49.080 Now, if that's true,

00:09:51.340 that would actually

00:09:52.200 at least be suggestive

00:09:54.180 that the feed

00:09:54.860 has a problem,

00:09:56.240 but I don't think

00:09:57.260 you're seeing

00:09:57.620 the same problems

00:09:58.740 in each app.

00:10:01.060 I'll bet you

00:10:01.800 if you looked

00:10:02.280 at the Roku app

00:10:03.300 and the YouTube TV app

00:10:07.060 at the same time,

00:10:07.900 even if they both

00:10:09.800 glitch,

00:10:10.960 bet it's not

00:10:11.520 at the same time.

00:10:13.160 I'll bet it's not.

00:10:14.160 I'd put a big bet

00:10:14.980 on that.

00:10:16.080 Because if they glitch

00:10:17.020 at the same time,

00:10:18.060 then it's the feed.

00:10:19.880 You know,

00:10:20.120 you've eliminated

00:10:20.740 the other options.

00:10:22.220 I don't think so.

00:10:23.300 I think it's going

00:10:23.780 to be different mistakes

00:10:24.840 that are unique

00:10:26.580 to Fox News.

00:10:28.220 That's what I think.

00:10:28.920 Now,

00:10:31.140 where do we have the,

00:10:32.580 when do we use the,

00:10:33.880 let's say,

00:10:35.260 assumption of innocence

00:10:36.300 versus the assumption

00:10:38.420 of guilt?

00:10:39.300 Now, in the legal system,

00:10:40.820 because it's humans

00:10:42.120 and we want to do

00:10:43.360 the best we can

00:10:44.060 for them,

00:10:45.000 assumption of innocence

00:10:46.020 is the standard

00:10:47.160 and we all agree

00:10:48.340 with that.

00:10:49.600 But in this specific case,

00:10:51.900 so this is not really

00:10:52.780 about any individual,

00:10:54.660 it's about whether

00:10:55.460 a system is working

00:10:57.780 the way it should

00:10:58.480 in this American experience.

00:11:01.900 Should you assume

00:11:02.940 that if you see

00:11:03.720 something like I'm seeing,

00:11:05.900 is my assumption,

00:11:07.000 should my starting

00:11:07.680 assumption be innocence?

00:11:09.300 That it's just a bug?

00:11:10.820 What do you think?

00:11:11.980 Is it reasonable

00:11:12.960 to assume

00:11:13.720 that this is just

00:11:15.640 a coincidence?

00:11:17.740 Is it reasonable?

00:11:19.320 I don't think it's reasonable

00:11:20.620 to assume that anymore.

00:11:22.000 It's entirely possible

00:11:23.280 it's a coincidence.

00:11:25.460 Let me be as clear

00:11:27.560 as I can.

00:11:28.740 If I had to put

00:11:29.540 a bet down,

00:11:30.540 I don't even know

00:11:31.360 which way I'd bet.

00:11:32.940 I mean, it looks like

00:11:33.720 a coin flip to me.

00:11:35.040 It's definitely possible

00:11:36.200 that it's just a bug.

00:11:37.940 It's definitely possible.

00:11:41.000 I just don't think

00:11:42.180 that should be

00:11:42.660 your starting assumption.

00:11:44.680 Now, I was going to

00:11:45.840 not talk about it

00:11:46.700 in public

00:11:47.100 because I thought,

00:11:48.080 you know,

00:11:48.980 the odds are so big

00:11:50.400 that this is just a bug

00:11:51.880 that it would be

00:11:53.900 embarrassing

00:11:54.360 if they say,

00:11:55.240 yeah, the feed was bad

00:11:56.540 and then they prove it.

00:11:57.840 I'm like,

00:11:58.280 oh, okay,

00:11:59.200 I made a big deal

00:11:59.860 about this

00:12:00.380 and it was just a bug.

00:12:03.640 But I think

00:12:04.400 we're at a point

00:12:05.160 in history

00:12:05.800 where the institution

00:12:07.680 has to be assumed

00:12:08.640 guilty

00:12:09.100 until they can

00:12:10.960 demonstrate they're not.

00:12:12.840 What do you think?

00:12:14.220 Is it inappropriate

00:12:15.540 to say that

00:12:16.340 the institution,

00:12:17.440 whether it's

00:12:18.000 Google or YouTube

00:12:19.540 or the FBI

00:12:20.500 or the government

00:12:21.360 or Congress,

00:12:22.020 it doesn't matter

00:12:22.560 who it is,

00:12:23.220 the media,

00:12:23.980 Fox News,

00:12:24.900 any entity,

00:12:26.080 just any public

00:12:27.780 facing entity,

00:12:29.900 I don't think

00:12:31.220 you can assume

00:12:31.860 that they're innocent.

00:12:33.940 I think you have

00:12:34.800 to assume

00:12:35.180 they're guilty

00:12:35.680 if you see

00:12:36.580 anecdotal evidence

00:12:38.180 suggesting it.

00:12:40.760 That's what I think.

00:12:44.620 Plug my prints.

00:12:46.840 Okay, I will.

00:12:47.960 Did you know

00:12:48.420 you could go

00:12:48.840 to Dilbert.com

00:12:49.920 and get a legal

00:12:51.420 authorized copy

00:12:53.680 of any of my strips

00:12:54.760 if you want to use it

00:12:55.880 in business

00:12:56.420 or something else.

00:12:57.640 If you want to write

00:12:58.420 an article about it.

00:12:59.260 So the ESG strips

00:13:00.480 are perfect for that.

00:13:03.100 A lot of people

00:13:03.620 are probably writing

00:13:04.320 about that topic.

00:13:06.000 So whether you're

00:13:06.620 writing pro

00:13:07.260 or negative

00:13:07.940 on that topic,

00:13:08.760 you might want

00:13:09.360 to license those strips.

00:13:10.600 tips for an ESG

00:13:15.900 free state.

00:13:17.140 You mean

00:13:17.620 what should we do

00:13:18.780 to get rid of ESG?

00:13:20.860 Well, what we should do

00:13:22.160 is what we're doing.

00:13:24.140 We need to mock

00:13:25.220 it out of existence.

00:13:26.640 There's no other way,

00:13:27.620 really.

00:13:28.440 It has to be mocked.

00:13:29.460 All right.

00:13:31.680 So Mike Lindell,

00:13:32.880 the MyPillow guy,

00:13:35.180 who's now more of

00:13:36.240 a MySlippers guy

00:13:37.180 it seems like,

00:13:37.800 but he was going

00:13:40.140 through a drive-thru

00:13:41.000 and the FBI

00:13:42.240 surrounded him.

00:13:43.900 They pulled their cars up

00:13:45.220 and blocked his car.

00:13:46.720 Imagine this happening

00:13:47.640 to you.

00:13:49.060 This happened in America

00:13:50.500 that they wanted

00:13:52.680 to serve him

00:13:53.260 with a subpoena,

00:13:54.440 I guess,

00:13:54.800 or a warrant

00:13:55.440 and get his phone

00:13:56.240 and they waited

00:13:57.980 until he was in his car

00:13:59.320 and they somehow

00:14:01.240 followed him

00:14:01.960 to a fast food place

00:14:03.460 and while he's in line

00:14:04.400 they surround him

00:14:05.720 with their FBI cars

00:14:07.080 now he did say

00:14:09.420 that they were just

00:14:10.060 polite and professional

00:14:11.520 and they didn't have

00:14:12.420 any kind of attitude

00:14:13.200 or anything.

00:14:14.700 So I'm going to give a

00:14:15.700 I'll give a compliment

00:14:16.780 to the FBI agents

00:14:18.240 because Mike Lindell did.

00:14:21.420 So Mike Lindell said

00:14:22.800 they did a good job

00:14:24.460 and I'm going to pass it along.

00:14:25.700 So that's for the agents

00:14:27.100 themselves.

00:14:28.600 But was it ever okay

00:14:30.320 for them to even do that

00:14:31.460 in the first place?

00:14:33.280 I mean,

00:14:33.540 I'm sure they did it

00:14:34.340 on orders or something

00:14:35.460 but that feels like

00:14:38.040 a public humiliation

00:14:39.060 with no purpose.

00:14:40.720 It also feels like

00:14:41.940 intimidation.

00:14:43.860 You don't think

00:14:44.640 they could have called him?

00:14:47.960 You don't think

00:14:48.660 they could have called him

00:14:49.320 and said,

00:14:49.800 hey,

00:14:50.200 somebody's going to come down

00:14:51.900 at 10 a.m.

00:14:53.380 and we've got a warrant

00:14:54.960 we're going to ask

00:14:55.540 for your phone.

00:14:57.040 Could you answer the door,

00:14:58.820 make sure somebody

00:14:59.440 answers the door

00:15:00.060 and bring your phone

00:15:00.800 with you?

00:15:02.360 What was he going to do?

00:15:03.520 Leave the country?

00:15:04.080 Did they think

00:15:05.780 that Mike Lindell

00:15:06.480 was a flight risk?

00:15:08.580 What,

00:15:08.880 did they think

00:15:09.300 that he was going

00:15:09.700 to hide his phone?

00:15:11.440 And let me ask you this,

00:15:13.260 why do you need

00:15:14.380 access to the phone?

00:15:16.240 How much is on the phone

00:15:17.740 that's not on the iCloud?

00:15:21.520 I'm wondering

00:15:22.160 if you even need

00:15:22.960 phones anymore.

00:15:24.120 Don't you just need,

00:15:25.800 but wiping it

00:15:26.940 doesn't help anymore,

00:15:27.840 does it?

00:15:29.360 Does wiping help?

00:15:30.460 If you wiped

00:15:32.700 your phone clean,

00:15:33.800 it'd still be

00:15:34.300 on the cloud,

00:15:34.900 right?

00:15:35.300 Or there'd be

00:15:35.800 a backup in the cloud,

00:15:37.140 or,

00:15:38.120 I don't think

00:15:38.640 you can wipe

00:15:39.140 a phone anymore,

00:15:39.900 can you?

00:15:40.960 I don't,

00:15:42.660 if it's Apple?

00:15:47.020 Yeah.

00:15:49.240 You can delete it all.

00:15:51.100 You can delete

00:15:51.980 the phone,

00:15:53.020 but I don't believe

00:15:53.980 you can delete

00:15:54.700 your iCloud records,

00:15:56.200 because there would

00:15:56.860 always be a backup.

00:15:58.460 Wouldn't there?

00:15:58.880 You tell me

00:16:00.580 there's no backup

00:16:01.580 of your iCloud

00:16:03.980 after you think

00:16:04.860 you've deleted it?

00:16:06.140 I don't believe that.

00:16:07.660 I don't believe

00:16:08.420 that at all.

00:16:10.040 Anyway,

00:16:10.680 so I don't,

00:16:11.180 there's some

00:16:11.500 technical questions

00:16:12.420 I wonder about,

00:16:13.620 might not be important,

00:16:15.120 but doesn't it look

00:16:16.720 like this is political?

00:16:19.360 Does this look

00:16:20.220 legal to you

00:16:20.900 or political?

00:16:23.280 Again,

00:16:24.100 do we give

00:16:25.480 the FBI

00:16:26.060 the benefit

00:16:26.700 of a doubt

00:16:27.320 the assumption

00:16:29.560 of innocence?

00:16:31.160 Has the FBI

00:16:32.040 earned

00:16:32.600 the assumption

00:16:33.340 of innocence?

00:16:34.820 Nope.

00:16:36.240 They have earned,

00:16:37.200 they have earned,

00:16:38.560 this is an important

00:16:40.340 question,

00:16:41.160 they've earned

00:16:41.960 a presumption

00:16:42.720 of guilt.

00:16:44.040 They've earned it.

00:16:45.360 I didn't do it.

00:16:46.840 If you're looking

00:16:47.500 at me,

00:16:47.920 don't blame me.

00:16:49.740 Look at the comments.

00:16:50.780 Everybody's on

00:16:51.280 the same page.

00:16:51.940 I didn't do it.

00:16:53.460 It wasn't my fault.

00:16:55.240 The FBI

00:16:55.940 got that themselves.

00:16:57.400 They went out

00:16:58.220 and got themselves

00:16:59.740 an assumption

00:17:00.320 of guilt.

00:17:02.140 So,

00:17:02.900 I'll apply that.

00:17:06.360 And it does

00:17:07.440 look like my,

00:17:09.020 when was the last

00:17:09.640 time somebody

00:17:10.220 mocked me

00:17:10.940 for suggesting

00:17:12.100 that Republicans

00:17:12.860 would be hunted?

00:17:13.680 Do you remember

00:17:15.580 how much mocking

00:17:16.540 I got the first

00:17:17.540 several months

00:17:18.240 of the Biden

00:17:18.860 administration?

00:17:20.280 When they couldn't

00:17:21.280 find all the hunting

00:17:22.420 I had predicted?

00:17:25.100 Nobody's mocking

00:17:25.860 me now,

00:17:26.300 are they?

00:17:27.960 Have you seen

00:17:28.660 even that one troll

00:17:29.680 come after me

00:17:30.540 and say,

00:17:31.220 lately,

00:17:32.140 lately,

00:17:32.860 last two weeks,

00:17:34.380 hey,

00:17:34.760 where's all that

00:17:35.380 haunting you

00:17:36.120 predicted,

00:17:36.960 Scott?

00:17:37.880 Where are all

00:17:38.380 these Republicans

00:17:39.380 being haunted?

00:17:40.700 I don't see

00:17:41.340 any of that.

00:17:43.360 They all shut 1.00

00:17:44.220 the fuck up, 1.00

00:17:44.980 didn't they? 0.98

00:17:45.340 Yeah,

00:17:47.260 yeah,

00:17:47.540 I guess I

00:17:48.100 served them

00:17:49.680 a nice dose

00:17:50.340 of shut the 1.00

00:17:50.960 fuck up, 1.00

00:17:51.580 didn't I? 1.00

00:17:52.660 I mean,

00:17:53.240 I didn't do it

00:17:53.720 intentionally,

00:17:54.300 I was just

00:17:54.660 sitting here.

00:17:55.860 But the news

00:17:56.980 delivered them

00:17:58.820 a nice,

00:17:59.620 heaping,

00:18:00.360 steaming pile

00:18:01.240 of shut the 1.00

00:18:01.960 fuck up 1.00

00:18:02.680 because the 1.00

00:18:03.920 hunting is

00:18:04.420 happening.

00:18:06.480 Now,

00:18:07.800 I've made

00:18:09.680 some pretty

00:18:10.240 unusual predictions

00:18:11.600 that have

00:18:12.340 come true.

00:18:15.200 This one

00:18:15.840 might be more

00:18:16.420 unusual than

00:18:17.220 even some

00:18:17.760 of the other

00:18:18.120 ones.

00:18:19.380 I mean,

00:18:19.560 who has ever

00:18:21.200 made that

00:18:21.660 kind of

00:18:22.000 prediction?

00:18:24.440 Right?

00:18:25.740 Has anybody

00:18:26.560 ever made

00:18:27.300 a prediction

00:18:27.760 that the

00:18:28.400 other team

00:18:28.920 would be

00:18:29.300 haunted

00:18:29.620 after an

00:18:30.240 election

00:18:30.540 in the

00:18:32.140 history of

00:18:32.580 the United

00:18:32.920 States?

00:18:33.260 Probably

00:18:33.500 never.

00:18:35.120 And yet

00:18:35.540 I made

00:18:35.920 that prediction

00:18:36.500 and people

00:18:37.560 laughed,

00:18:39.800 mocked me

00:18:40.500 mercilessly,

00:18:41.940 and then

00:18:42.940 they got a

00:18:43.440 big old

00:18:44.540 dose of

00:18:45.360 shut the 1.00

00:18:45.940 fuck up. 1.00

00:18:47.340 Reality 1.00

00:18:47.820 is awesome

00:18:48.380 sometimes.

00:18:49.560 I saw

00:18:50.800 I think

00:18:52.940 it was

00:18:53.160 on

00:18:53.720 Instagram,

00:18:54.400 a little

00:18:54.580 reel,

00:18:55.940 a little

00:18:56.460 bit by

00:18:56.840 Joe Rogan.

00:18:59.540 And he

00:19:00.140 was saying

00:19:00.500 that success

00:19:01.060 is meaningless

00:19:01.840 if no one

00:19:02.680 loves you.

00:19:05.080 There's no

00:19:05.800 point to it.

00:19:07.080 You know,

00:19:07.280 you could go

00:19:07.720 out and

00:19:08.120 succeed and

00:19:08.840 really make

00:19:09.500 something of

00:19:09.980 yourself,

00:19:10.520 but if

00:19:11.260 nobody cares,

00:19:13.120 and I'm not

00:19:13.800 talking about

00:19:14.240 strangers,

00:19:14.780 I'm talking

00:19:16.900 about like

00:19:17.380 in your

00:19:17.620 actual

00:19:17.880 personal

00:19:18.460 situation,

00:19:19.720 if nobody

00:19:20.200 loves you,

00:19:21.720 like for

00:19:22.180 who you

00:19:22.620 are and

00:19:23.100 really cares

00:19:23.620 about what

00:19:24.060 you did,

00:19:25.440 none of it

00:19:26.060 matters.

00:19:27.780 I mean,

00:19:28.340 it matters to

00:19:28.940 the world.

00:19:31.400 And I have to

00:19:32.960 say this hit me

00:19:33.940 a little bit

00:19:34.360 hard,

00:19:35.060 because while I

00:19:36.020 do feel,

00:19:36.580 you know,

00:19:36.920 lots of love

00:19:37.660 from the

00:19:38.640 audience,

00:19:39.800 lots of love

00:19:40.400 from, you know,

00:19:41.240 just people who are

00:19:41.900 Dilbert fans

00:19:42.580 and stuff,

00:19:43.460 and I do

00:19:43.860 feel lots of

00:19:44.420 love from,

00:19:45.340 you know,

00:19:45.640 community and

00:19:46.760 friends and

00:19:48.080 stuff,

00:19:48.660 but I'm not

00:19:49.220 in a relationship

00:19:51.480 right now.

00:19:53.320 And I have to

00:19:54.320 tell you,

00:19:54.640 this hit me,

00:19:56.140 because there

00:19:57.300 are parts of

00:19:57.800 your life which

00:19:59.280 you experience

00:20:00.040 alone,

00:20:01.160 and then they

00:20:01.660 disappear.

00:20:03.620 It's weird to

00:20:05.000 not be able to

00:20:05.880 experience life

00:20:07.180 as a shared

00:20:09.200 experience,

00:20:10.440 which is,

00:20:10.960 that's sort of

00:20:11.600 the weird

00:20:12.260 situation I'm

00:20:13.080 having.

00:20:13.620 Now,

00:20:13.920 I do share

00:20:14.340 it with you,

00:20:15.760 but I think

00:20:16.260 you would

00:20:16.680 acknowledge it's

00:20:17.800 different from

00:20:18.460 being in some

00:20:19.620 kind of relationship.

00:20:21.280 So it's a

00:20:22.120 very weird

00:20:24.080 and unsettling

00:20:25.080 experience I'm

00:20:26.060 having,

00:20:26.940 which is,

00:20:28.320 100% of my

00:20:29.560 efforts are

00:20:31.780 to benefit

00:20:32.500 you.

00:20:34.460 They don't

00:20:34.900 really benefit

00:20:35.500 me.

00:20:36.900 And,

00:20:37.220 well,

00:20:37.360 except,

00:20:37.760 you know,

00:20:38.000 whatever reflected,

00:20:39.780 you know,

00:20:40.540 credit,

00:20:40.920 I guess.

00:20:42.040 But I have

00:20:42.620 to say that

00:20:43.060 I don't

00:20:43.360 feel it

00:20:44.080 like,

00:20:46.340 I don't

00:20:48.180 feel it like

00:20:48.800 you would if

00:20:49.280 you were sharing

00:20:49.840 it with somebody

00:20:50.380 specific.

00:20:51.640 You know what

00:20:51.900 I mean?

00:20:52.720 It's,

00:20:53.960 and I'm

00:20:54.780 going to give

00:20:55.080 you a little

00:20:55.500 micro lesson

00:20:56.680 here.

00:20:56.980 I wasn't

00:20:57.200 planning on it,

00:20:57.780 but I'll

00:21:00.920 never get

00:21:01.280 another beauty

00:21:02.220 like Christina.

00:21:03.540 Somebody says

00:21:04.240 it was a big

00:21:04.740 blunder to let

00:21:05.460 her go. 0.54

00:21:06.660 Well,

00:21:06.920 you know,

00:21:07.200 beauty isn't 0.98

00:21:08.320 the only

00:21:08.760 criteria,

00:21:11.340 is but

00:21:12.480 one.

00:21:15.940 Anyway,

00:21:18.220 the micro lesson

00:21:19.460 was on

00:21:20.160 treating life

00:21:21.080 like a

00:21:21.900 video game

00:21:22.900 and

00:21:24.420 gamifying

00:21:26.100 your actual

00:21:28.300 life.

00:21:28.840 And I've

00:21:29.060 been doing

00:21:29.320 more of that

00:21:29.840 lately.

00:21:31.060 For example,

00:21:33.000 if I am

00:21:33.880 folding my

00:21:34.960 laundry,

00:21:36.720 I could

00:21:37.420 frame it

00:21:37.900 in my

00:21:38.100 head as,

00:21:38.600 oh,

00:21:38.980 God,

00:21:39.540 folding

00:21:39.980 laundry,

00:21:40.740 oh,

00:21:41.560 boring,

00:21:42.320 I want to

00:21:42.620 do something

00:21:42.960 interesting.

00:21:44.040 But instead,

00:21:44.900 I treat it

00:21:45.300 like a game.

00:21:46.980 So I try

00:21:47.740 to do it

00:21:48.200 in the most

00:21:48.880 efficient way.

00:21:50.420 And I say,

00:21:50.940 okay,

00:21:51.160 the game

00:21:51.720 is to see

00:21:52.880 how quickly

00:21:53.420 and efficiently

00:21:54.000 I can do

00:21:54.620 this.

00:21:54.980 And then I

00:21:55.340 sort of

00:21:55.600 enjoy it.

00:21:56.660 Because,

00:21:57.120 you know,

00:21:57.380 I've got a

00:21:57.960 towel folding

00:21:58.580 technique that

00:21:59.420 just feels

00:21:59.920 fun to do.

00:22:01.380 And it

00:22:01.640 becomes like

00:22:02.560 a skill

00:22:03.300 game.

00:22:04.500 And then I

00:22:04.860 get through

00:22:05.180 it,

00:22:05.340 and I

00:22:05.460 like it.

00:22:06.300 And I

00:22:06.840 manage to

00:22:07.320 do that

00:22:07.660 with a

00:22:07.900 whole bunch

00:22:08.220 of other

00:22:08.560 things.

00:22:09.360 You know,

00:22:09.520 little boring

00:22:10.180 things,

00:22:10.900 et cetera.

00:22:12.380 Or even

00:22:12.920 getting in

00:22:13.340 trouble,

00:22:13.840 or even

00:22:14.160 business

00:22:14.500 things.

00:22:15.880 You know,

00:22:16.240 to me,

00:22:16.760 I treat

00:22:17.260 them more

00:22:17.660 like there's

00:22:19.080 a game

00:22:19.460 with rules,

00:22:21.100 and here's

00:22:21.640 my little

00:22:22.080 challenge,

00:22:23.240 and I've

00:22:23.460 got to get

00:22:24.420 past that

00:22:24.840 challenge.

00:22:26.260 But I'm

00:22:27.220 writing this

00:22:27.740 in my

00:22:28.300 upcoming book,

00:22:29.040 so you

00:22:29.440 might see

00:22:29.740 this again.

00:22:30.840 But,

00:22:31.100 one of

00:22:33.200 the things

00:22:33.520 that video

00:22:34.020 games do

00:22:34.640 is they

00:22:35.040 don't give

00:22:35.560 you,

00:22:36.180 typically,

00:22:37.260 they don't

00:22:37.700 give you

00:22:38.060 all the

00:22:38.360 resources you

00:22:39.140 need to

00:22:39.520 win the

00:22:39.840 game at

00:22:40.760 the start

00:22:41.200 of the

00:22:41.400 game.

00:22:42.400 You have

00:22:42.960 to go

00:22:43.200 get them.

00:22:44.300 So you

00:22:45.020 don't have

00:22:45.380 all the

00:22:45.660 energy you

00:22:46.220 need,

00:22:46.540 or life,

00:22:47.080 or weapons,

00:22:47.680 you have

00:22:47.920 to find

00:22:48.320 them along

00:22:48.800 the way.

00:22:49.680 But you

00:22:50.200 don't know

00:22:50.540 where they

00:22:50.860 will be.

00:22:51.640 You just

00:22:52.180 have to

00:22:52.580 trust that

00:22:54.820 if you

00:22:55.120 play well,

00:22:55.700 you're going

00:22:55.960 to find

00:22:56.300 stuff.

00:22:57.560 And the

00:22:57.860 longer you

00:22:58.600 play,

00:22:58.940 the better

00:22:59.220 you'll be

00:22:59.520 at finding

00:23:00.240 stuff,

00:23:00.680 I guess.

00:23:02.080 And I

00:23:03.620 treat the

00:23:04.080 actual world

00:23:04.840 like that.

00:23:07.080 And it

00:23:07.740 works really

00:23:08.260 well.

00:23:09.100 Because the

00:23:09.540 actual world

00:23:10.360 does serve

00:23:11.560 up resources

00:23:12.480 in surprising

00:23:14.260 ways,

00:23:14.860 just like

00:23:15.200 video games.

00:23:16.700 So if I

00:23:17.560 say to

00:23:17.860 myself,

00:23:18.540 I want

00:23:19.060 to accomplish

00:23:19.580 X, but I

00:23:20.320 don't know

00:23:20.620 how to get

00:23:20.980 there, and

00:23:21.920 I don't have

00:23:22.400 the resources

00:23:22.960 to do it,

00:23:24.300 I never

00:23:24.760 say don't

00:23:25.300 start.

00:23:26.840 Because if

00:23:27.540 you did

00:23:27.820 that with

00:23:28.080 a video

00:23:28.420 game, you

00:23:29.520 wouldn't

00:23:29.760 play.

00:23:30.060 So instead

00:23:32.040 I say,

00:23:32.640 what's the

00:23:32.980 only thing

00:23:33.760 I can

00:23:34.140 do?

00:23:34.880 Now maybe

00:23:35.220 the only

00:23:35.560 thing I

00:23:35.920 can do

00:23:36.420 is do

00:23:37.460 a Google

00:23:37.860 search.

00:23:39.900 Or ask

00:23:40.640 somebody a

00:23:41.060 question.

00:23:41.980 It's all I

00:23:42.420 can do.

00:23:42.780 I don't have

00:23:43.080 any resources

00:23:43.760 or even know

00:23:44.680 what to do

00:23:45.100 next.

00:23:45.840 But I do

00:23:46.700 that first

00:23:47.180 step, and

00:23:48.200 then I see

00:23:48.660 if I get

00:23:49.180 a resource.

00:23:50.020 For

00:23:51.560 example, the

00:23:53.580 process of

00:23:54.320 writing the

00:23:54.800 book I'm

00:23:55.140 writing.

00:23:56.560 Here was

00:23:57.100 the process.

00:23:58.120 I didn't

00:23:58.580 have the

00:23:58.940 energy, and

00:23:59.640 I didn't

00:23:59.880 have the

00:24:00.220 resources to

00:24:00.980 do it.

00:24:01.920 And I

00:24:02.400 didn't even

00:24:02.720 have a

00:24:03.000 great idea

00:24:03.540 for a

00:24:04.800 book.

00:24:05.700 Now one

00:24:06.100 day I got

00:24:06.480 this idea

00:24:06.960 of doing

00:24:07.320 something about

00:24:07.800 reframing,

00:24:09.120 and I just

00:24:09.860 wrote it on

00:24:10.500 my whiteboard,

00:24:11.800 you know,

00:24:12.120 reframing book.

00:24:13.480 No title for

00:24:14.280 the book or

00:24:14.660 anything, just

00:24:15.120 sort of an

00:24:15.520 idea.

00:24:16.520 Once I

00:24:17.060 wrote it

00:24:17.380 down and

00:24:18.760 looked at it

00:24:19.340 every time I

00:24:19.880 saw it, I

00:24:21.080 started thinking,

00:24:21.740 you know, I

00:24:23.120 should at

00:24:23.500 least, at

00:24:24.420 the very

00:24:24.760 least, I

00:24:26.520 should see if

00:24:27.060 there would

00:24:27.340 be some

00:24:28.200 chapter titles

00:24:29.480 that would

00:24:29.840 fit into

00:24:30.300 that.

00:24:31.240 And then I

00:24:31.600 just start, I

00:24:32.360 open up a

00:24:32.860 document, and

00:24:34.280 I put a

00:24:35.400 reframing book,

00:24:36.320 you know,

00:24:36.520 working title.

00:24:38.120 And then I

00:24:38.640 just say,

00:24:38.980 what would be

00:24:39.400 in that?

00:24:40.380 And I think

00:24:40.860 of some

00:24:41.140 examples.

00:24:42.160 And they're

00:24:42.460 just bullet

00:24:42.880 points.

00:24:43.940 And they're

00:24:44.400 just bullet

00:24:44.780 points that

00:24:45.300 would become

00:24:45.700 maybe chapter

00:24:46.700 headings at

00:24:47.460 some point.

00:24:48.760 And then I

00:24:49.380 look at it

00:24:49.800 and say,

00:24:50.120 huh, this

00:24:51.460 looks like it

00:24:52.000 could be a

00:24:52.400 book.

00:24:53.440 And then I

00:24:54.100 get a

00:24:55.040 resource.

00:24:56.520 I get an

00:24:57.100 energy from

00:24:58.780 having done

00:24:59.380 something that

00:24:59.900 looks like,

00:25:00.400 huh, this

00:25:01.300 could be

00:25:01.600 something.

00:25:02.100 Then I

00:25:02.380 imagine it.

00:25:03.840 Then I

00:25:04.720 shared it

00:25:05.980 with you.

00:25:07.600 I shared

00:25:08.000 it on

00:25:08.300 livestream that

00:25:08.940 I was

00:25:09.160 thinking about

00:25:09.660 it.

00:25:10.140 Then people

00:25:10.600 said, yes,

00:25:11.280 yes, write

00:25:11.720 that book.

00:25:12.820 We'd love to

00:25:13.340 have that

00:25:13.640 book.

00:25:14.700 And then I

00:25:15.160 got a

00:25:15.400 resource.

00:25:16.500 I got

00:25:16.880 energy.

00:25:17.840 So I

00:25:18.320 didn't have

00:25:18.720 the energy

00:25:19.140 to do it.

00:25:20.520 I simply

00:25:21.320 trusted, like a

00:25:22.380 video game, that

00:25:23.720 if I started

00:25:24.300 walking forward, I

00:25:25.320 could figure it

00:25:25.880 out.

00:25:27.280 And I

00:25:28.500 figured out I

00:25:29.140 needed energy.

00:25:30.640 And so I

00:25:31.080 went to you and

00:25:32.220 said, hey, I got

00:25:32.780 this idea, and then

00:25:33.540 you gave me

00:25:34.000 energy.

00:25:35.320 And I 1.00

00:25:35.760 thought, oh, shit, 1.00

00:25:36.500 people really want 0.99

00:25:37.280 to see this book.

00:25:38.820 Now that's

00:25:39.500 different.

00:25:40.360 Because if it's the

00:25:41.300 publisher who wants

00:25:42.180 to see it, that's

00:25:42.940 interesting.

00:25:43.320 But that's

00:25:45.300 different than if

00:25:46.280 the public wants

00:25:46.980 to see it, right?

00:25:48.160 And it's

00:25:48.500 different than if I

00:25:49.200 just want to make

00:25:50.400 a book.

00:25:51.560 So now I've got

00:25:52.500 energy.

00:25:52.880 Then I go to my

00:25:53.700 agent, book

00:25:56.080 agent.

00:25:56.720 I say, I got

00:25:57.140 this idea.

00:25:58.520 And he looks at

00:25:59.120 the idea, and he

00:26:00.040 says, I love this

00:26:01.460 idea.

00:26:02.180 We definitely sell

00:26:02.960 this idea.

00:26:04.460 Let's talk to your

00:26:05.560 favorite publisher.

00:26:07.000 And I talk to my

00:26:07.860 favorite publisher, and

00:26:08.720 they say, we love

00:26:09.380 this idea.

00:26:09.880 Now I've got all

00:26:11.640 the energy I

00:26:12.220 need.

00:26:13.120 I've got audience, I've

00:26:14.380 got a publisher, I've

00:26:15.380 got my agent, and

00:26:16.320 they're the ones that

00:26:16.840 know the most, right?

00:26:18.520 It'd be one thing if a

00:26:19.440 stranger said, oh, do

00:26:20.480 that.

00:26:21.040 But when the experts,

00:26:22.780 the people who know

00:26:23.640 what needs to be in a

00:26:25.340 book to sell, when

00:26:27.520 they tell you that

00:26:28.160 something, well, that's

00:26:29.560 energizing.

00:26:31.220 All right?

00:26:31.960 So then I start

00:26:33.460 writing.

00:26:34.400 And of course, it's

00:26:35.040 hard, and it's

00:26:35.700 boring, and I fall

00:26:37.140 asleep and stuff.

00:26:37.940 So, you know, you

00:26:39.260 know my story of

00:26:39.980 trying to work

00:26:40.480 through how I can

00:26:41.140 stay awake and have

00:26:41.940 time to do it and

00:26:42.600 stuff.

00:26:43.460 It was a separate

00:26:44.060 process.

00:26:45.320 But now I've gotten

00:26:46.540 to the point where I've

00:26:47.200 got 36,000 words.

00:26:50.620 And all the chapters

00:26:52.340 are stubbed out.

00:26:53.440 So every chapter has

00:26:54.660 at least a paragraph

00:26:55.520 that I'll maybe plump

00:26:57.880 out a little bit.

00:26:59.320 But once you see a

00:27:00.600 book with probably 90

00:27:05.140 reframes in it, and

00:27:07.920 35,000 words, you

00:27:11.640 know you have to

00:27:12.360 finish it.

00:27:13.700 You have to finish

00:27:14.360 it.

00:27:15.120 Right?

00:27:15.320 Because you're not

00:27:15.700 going to leave half a

00:27:16.560 book if you have my

00:27:18.520 personality.

00:27:19.360 Some people could, but

00:27:20.480 I don't have the

00:27:21.800 personality where I

00:27:23.480 can leave something

00:27:24.200 that pregnant and

00:27:25.680 then walk away from

00:27:26.480 it.

00:27:27.440 Don't make any

00:27:28.240 jokes.

00:27:28.820 I know you're

00:27:29.220 going to.

00:27:30.320 But so that's the

00:27:31.940 process.

00:27:32.280 The process is you

00:27:33.600 don't understand that

00:27:35.500 there's energy.

00:27:36.600 You understand that

00:27:37.700 you're in a game in

00:27:40.020 which the energy will

00:27:41.280 be there if you look

00:27:42.280 for it.

00:27:43.420 But you've got to go

00:27:44.100 get it.

00:27:45.360 Right?

00:27:45.920 Now you will be

00:27:46.940 amazed how many times

00:27:48.240 gamifying a real

00:27:50.060 world thing makes

00:27:51.400 sense.

00:27:52.440 Somebody just

00:27:52.960 mentioned starting,

00:27:55.260 let's say, looking

00:27:56.340 for a job.

00:27:58.820 How awful is the

00:28:00.320 process of looking

00:28:01.500 for a job and

00:28:02.560 going on interviews?

00:28:04.920 Really awful.

00:28:06.560 Right?

00:28:06.900 You don't like it.

00:28:08.120 But what if he

00:28:08.580 gamified it?

00:28:10.260 I have a friend who

00:28:11.180 used to do that.

00:28:12.000 He'd go on interviews

00:28:12.920 not because he wanted

00:28:14.640 the job.

00:28:15.520 Sometimes they were

00:28:16.220 worse jobs than the

00:28:17.160 one he had.

00:28:18.200 But he gamified it.

00:28:19.760 He said, I'm going

00:28:20.780 to enjoy going on

00:28:21.680 this interview and

00:28:22.500 going through the

00:28:23.520 process.

00:28:24.320 And in the process

00:28:24.880 I'm going to get

00:28:25.540 good at interviewing.

00:28:27.900 So one day he went

00:28:28.940 for yet another

00:28:30.040 interview.

00:28:30.820 interview that was

00:28:31.820 below the job he

00:28:32.960 already had.

00:28:34.420 So he does the

00:28:35.040 interview because that

00:28:35.940 was his process.

00:28:36.760 He had a system.

00:28:37.960 His system was he'd 0.91

00:28:38.940 always do the

00:28:39.460 interview no matter

00:28:40.560 what the job was.

00:28:42.220 So he does the

00:28:42.880 system, finishes the

00:28:44.780 interview, and the

00:28:45.940 hiring person says,

00:28:47.400 you know, you're way

00:28:48.500 overqualified for this

00:28:49.560 job.

00:28:50.260 This isn't really the

00:28:51.260 fit for you.

00:28:52.680 However, the boss of

00:28:55.220 the person in the job

00:28:56.320 we were trying to fill

00:28:57.160 is also going to be

00:28:58.300 leaving.

00:28:58.560 You might be perfect

00:29:00.160 for that job.

00:29:02.360 So he got a job and

00:29:03.800 a promotion at the

00:29:04.620 same time, accidentally.

00:29:06.940 And he took it.

00:29:08.740 Because his system was

00:29:10.200 they would just put him

00:29:11.160 in situations where

00:29:12.220 good things could

00:29:13.000 happen.

00:29:14.260 No specific good

00:29:15.460 thing.

00:29:16.500 I mean, specifically

00:29:17.460 it's a job, but he

00:29:18.700 just put himself in a

00:29:19.660 situation where over

00:29:21.020 and over again, luck

00:29:22.820 could find him.

00:29:23.980 If he stayed home

00:29:26.340 thinking about a job

00:29:27.460 or just did some

00:29:28.380 Google searches, how's

00:29:29.860 luck going to find

00:29:30.540 him?

00:29:31.140 It's not going to

00:29:31.640 find him.

00:29:32.420 He's hiding.

00:29:33.640 But he didn't hide

00:29:34.500 from luck.

00:29:35.820 He gamified his

00:29:36.880 experience, said, yeah,

00:29:38.040 go on another

00:29:38.560 interview.

00:29:38.920 This will be fun.

00:29:39.960 I'll just enjoy the

00:29:40.680 process like a game.

00:29:44.060 He's doing great.

00:29:45.180 Just ran into the

00:29:46.200 other day.

00:29:46.980 Career is just

00:29:47.940 killing it.

00:29:48.780 All right. 1.00

00:29:53.700 Does it bother you

00:29:54.880 when you hear people

00:29:55.660 called election

00:29:56.500 deniers?

00:29:58.380 Does that phrase

00:29:59.500 just get to you a

00:30:01.120 little bit like,

00:30:02.220 you know, what

00:30:06.140 about election

00:30:07.840 skeptic?

00:30:09.560 Would that bother

00:30:10.560 you?

00:30:11.760 Election skeptic.

00:30:13.740 Because I have to

00:30:15.400 admit that some of

00:30:16.460 the skeptics bring an

00:30:18.700 upon themselves by

00:30:19.880 making it an

00:30:20.640 absolute.

00:30:21.760 It would be one

00:30:22.660 thing to say we

00:30:23.560 need a system where

00:30:24.460 we can have more

00:30:25.040 confidence.

00:30:26.740 Perfectly reasonable

00:30:27.700 request.

00:30:28.960 It is not reasonable

00:30:30.020 to say that you

00:30:31.520 know with 100%

00:30:32.560 certainty that that,

00:30:34.740 let's say, 2020

00:30:35.540 election was stolen

00:30:37.760 in an important

00:30:40.760 way.

00:30:42.120 It is not reasonable

00:30:43.340 to say you know it

00:30:44.180 for sure.

00:30:46.400 Does anybody

00:30:46.760 disagree with that?

00:30:48.700 I get how big

00:30:50.420 the signals are.

00:30:52.200 The signals are

00:30:53.100 like just flashing.

00:30:55.360 But how many of

00:30:56.220 those flashing

00:30:56.960 signals have been

00:30:57.960 debunked so far?

00:30:59.840 Like all of them?

00:31:01.520 Or almost all of

00:31:02.720 them?

00:31:04.660 And so he says

00:31:05.400 none.

00:31:06.340 Well, there wasn't

00:31:07.120 any Kraken,

00:31:08.640 was there?

00:31:09.360 There wasn't any

00:31:10.340 Venezuelan general

00:31:12.380 involved with anything.

00:31:13.440 So here's what I

00:31:17.260 suggest.

00:31:17.780 I think we should

00:31:18.480 have a name for

00:31:19.320 the other side.

00:31:20.680 The people who

00:31:21.520 believe elections

00:31:22.560 are definitely,

00:31:23.980 totally,

00:31:25.140 no doubt about it,

00:31:26.960 absolutely good.

00:31:31.780 Don't we need a name

00:31:32.800 for them?

00:31:34.220 I'm going to call

00:31:35.000 them the election

00:31:35.780 gullibles.

00:31:36.360 Because you'd be

00:31:39.060 gullible as hell

00:31:39.980 if the reason that

00:31:42.020 you think the

00:31:42.500 election was valid

00:31:43.500 was because the

00:31:45.780 least credible

00:31:46.900 institutions that

00:31:48.340 we've ever seen

00:31:49.180 in our human

00:31:50.300 existence told you

00:31:52.060 they were fine.

00:31:54.300 Because you didn't

00:31:55.200 do an audit,

00:31:55.800 did you?

00:31:56.620 Did any of you

00:31:57.480 audit the entire

00:31:58.300 election in 2020?

00:31:59.460 I didn't.

00:32:00.960 I was busy.

00:32:01.860 Maybe other

00:32:03.980 people did.

00:32:05.500 So if other

00:32:06.100 people audit

00:32:06.660 something and

00:32:07.280 tell you about

00:32:07.980 it, you don't

00:32:09.360 know what

00:32:09.700 happened.

00:32:10.080 You only know

00:32:10.520 what they told

00:32:10.940 you.

00:32:12.060 Am I right?

00:32:13.680 If somebody

00:32:14.460 else does an

00:32:15.100 audit and then

00:32:15.700 they tell you

00:32:16.180 what happened,

00:32:17.300 you don't know

00:32:17.860 what happened.

00:32:18.300 You only know

00:32:18.740 what they told

00:32:19.180 you.

00:32:20.500 So the people

00:32:22.500 who are just

00:32:23.140 absolutely,

00:32:24.240 positively convinced

00:32:25.540 this election

00:32:26.620 or any other

00:32:27.300 election had no

00:32:28.560 problems at all.

00:32:30.420 They're gullible.

00:32:32.860 Now, they

00:32:33.480 might be right.

00:32:36.220 Can you handle

00:32:37.040 that nuance?

00:32:38.660 They could be

00:32:39.340 gullible for

00:32:40.840 believing somebody

00:32:41.700 who shouldn't be

00:32:42.320 believed.

00:32:43.940 But sometimes it

00:32:44.940 might be true.

00:32:46.180 It might be true 1.00

00:32:47.160 that the election

00:32:47.720 was fine.

00:32:49.160 I'm completely

00:32:50.000 open to that,

00:32:50.660 by the way.

00:32:51.400 I'm completely

00:32:52.060 open to it.

00:32:52.680 It might have

00:32:52.920 been fine.

00:32:53.720 Maybe.

00:32:54.420 Maybe just there

00:32:55.500 were more mail-in

00:32:56.680 votes and maybe 0.99

00:32:58.080 people just wanted

00:32:58.800 to go to sleep at

00:32:59.580 night and recount

00:33:00.220 in the morning

00:33:00.800 when they had

00:33:01.740 more votes

00:33:02.220 coming in

00:33:02.640 by mail.

00:33:03.580 Maybe.

00:33:04.540 Who knows?

00:33:07.020 You know,

00:33:07.680 the...

00:33:08.620 I just want

00:33:09.660 to toss this

00:33:10.160 down here

00:33:10.520 as a possibility,

00:33:11.620 but the people

00:33:13.200 who wondered

00:33:13.580 why the elections

00:33:14.220 were stopped

00:33:14.920 overnight,

00:33:16.360 wasn't it because

00:33:17.500 there were still

00:33:17.980 votes coming in

00:33:18.820 and there was

00:33:19.820 no point in

00:33:20.340 working overnight

00:33:21.080 if you knew

00:33:22.140 you had to come

00:33:22.640 back in the

00:33:23.040 morning anyway

00:33:23.560 because there

00:33:24.680 would still

00:33:24.920 be votes

00:33:25.320 coming in?

00:33:25.780 because it

00:33:27.320 seems like

00:33:27.660 they kept

00:33:27.940 finding them,

00:33:28.680 right?

00:33:30.380 I don't know.

00:33:31.580 Somebody says

00:33:32.160 no,

00:33:32.520 I'm just

00:33:33.020 floating that

00:33:33.800 possibility.

00:33:34.260 All right,

00:33:35.900 well,

00:33:36.060 there's some

00:33:36.360 things that

00:33:36.720 we don't

00:33:37.000 understand,

00:33:38.580 but I'm

00:33:38.980 going to say,

00:33:39.560 I'm going to

00:33:39.860 start using

00:33:40.300 this,

00:33:40.620 the election

00:33:41.060 gullibles,

00:33:42.160 because if

00:33:42.820 the least

00:33:43.580 credible

00:33:44.100 institutions

00:33:44.920 in the world

00:33:45.620 told you

00:33:46.080 something was

00:33:46.680 good,

00:33:47.620 you don't

00:33:49.000 have any

00:33:49.460 evidence.

00:33:50.800 You're gullible

00:33:51.460 if you believe

00:33:52.220 it to be

00:33:53.500 absolutely

00:33:53.980 true.

00:33:54.920 You're not

00:33:55.600 gullible if

00:33:56.320 you simply

00:33:56.780 act as

00:33:57.320 though it's

00:33:57.600 true.

00:33:58.760 That would

00:33:59.420 be actually

00:34:00.060 just a

00:34:00.500 reasonable

00:34:00.780 thing to

00:34:01.200 do.

00:34:01.860 We can

00:34:02.480 act as

00:34:03.080 though it's

00:34:03.420 true.

00:34:05.120 I think

00:34:05.780 we do.

00:34:09.320 Lindsey

00:34:09.840 Graham,

00:34:10.740 yesterday was

00:34:13.740 such a weird

00:34:14.280 day because

00:34:15.440 both the

00:34:15.940 Republicans

00:34:16.360 and the

00:34:17.400 Democrats

00:34:18.600 just completely

00:34:19.680 failed in

00:34:20.960 their political

00:34:21.660 messaging.

00:34:23.500 Lindsey Graham

00:34:24.580 decides that

00:34:27.300 this would

00:34:27.600 be a good

00:34:27.980 time to

00:34:29.020 introduce a

00:34:29.640 bill to

00:34:30.000 ban abortion 0.98

00:34:30.680 nationwide after

00:34:31.580 15 weeks.

00:34:33.040 Now, I'm

00:34:34.140 not going to

00:34:34.500 give you any

00:34:34.960 opinions on

00:34:35.540 abortion because

00:34:37.020 I have a 1.00

00:34:37.740 cock. 1.00

00:34:38.760 Everybody

00:34:39.120 okay with

00:34:39.600 that?

00:34:41.120 You don't

00:34:41.720 want to hear

00:34:42.100 my opinion

00:34:43.080 on abortion

00:34:43.640 because I

00:34:44.440 have a 1.00

00:34:44.680 cock. 0.99

00:34:45.620 So, if

00:34:46.680 you want an

00:34:47.120 opinion on

00:34:47.580 abortion, ask

00:34:48.180 a woman and

00:34:49.960 then tell me

00:34:50.820 what she

00:34:51.100 said.

00:34:52.440 That's my

00:34:53.200 view on

00:34:53.540 opinion.

00:34:54.580 I'm going

00:34:55.140 to take the 0.98

00:34:55.780 cock exception

00:34:57.920 option out

00:34:58.760 because I

00:35:00.000 don't want you

00:35:00.400 to be thinking

00:35:00.940 about my

00:35:01.420 opinion on

00:35:01.900 abortion when

00:35:02.540 I tell you

00:35:03.100 this story.

00:35:04.240 This is just

00:35:05.020 a political

00:35:05.480 story.

00:35:06.400 The political

00:35:07.120 story is

00:35:08.380 why the

00:35:09.060 hell would 0.91

00:35:10.580 you bring 0.62

00:35:10.940 up the

00:35:11.620 one thing

00:35:12.120 that can

00:35:12.480 destroy your 0.68

00:35:13.280 election

00:35:13.660 possibilities when

00:35:14.840 everything is

00:35:15.340 going well for

00:35:16.060 the Republicans

00:35:16.620 or largely

00:35:17.680 and then you

00:35:19.160 bring up the

00:35:19.680 one topic that

00:35:20.680 could derail

00:35:21.300 everything?

00:35:23.200 Now, if

00:35:24.260 somebody said

00:35:24.800 he does

00:35:25.140 this every

00:35:25.580 year, he

00:35:26.780 floats the

00:35:27.860 idea every

00:35:28.400 year, is

00:35:28.740 that true?

00:35:29.840 But that

00:35:30.400 wouldn't be an

00:35:31.200 explanation for

00:35:32.380 why he did

00:35:32.800 it this year.

00:35:34.080 Yeah, it

00:35:34.580 doesn't matter

00:35:35.060 that he does

00:35:35.580 this every

00:35:36.040 year.

00:35:37.880 I mean, maybe

00:35:38.320 that's his

00:35:38.820 explanation.

00:35:40.480 But it's

00:35:41.560 still insanely 0.97

00:35:42.760 dumb if you 1.00

00:35:43.920 want your team 1.00

00:35:44.500 to win.

00:35:46.760 Now, since

00:35:47.540 that's just an

00:35:48.200 internal political

00:35:48.960 thing, that's

00:35:49.640 more his problem

00:35:50.460 and the

00:35:51.020 Republicans

00:35:51.500 problem.

00:35:52.460 But it's

00:35:52.700 fun to

00:35:53.080 watch.

00:35:54.940 I love

00:35:55.640 watching a

00:35:56.320 politician make

00:35:57.080 a mistake that

00:35:57.780 not one of

00:35:58.540 us would have

00:35:59.040 made.

00:36:00.360 Would you

00:36:00.960 have made

00:36:01.280 that mistake?

00:36:03.780 Seriously,

00:36:04.420 would you?

00:36:05.320 You would have

00:36:06.000 known not to

00:36:06.600 do that, right?

00:36:08.000 I feel like

00:36:08.560 everybody would

00:36:09.520 have.

00:36:10.560 So, I

00:36:11.020 don't know,

00:36:11.260 maybe he has

00:36:11.700 some four

00:36:12.880 dimensional game

00:36:13.680 that we're not

00:36:14.140 seeing.

00:36:15.260 And it could

00:36:15.780 be that he's

00:36:16.280 just being

00:36:16.640 consistent.

00:36:18.200 It could

00:36:18.520 be.

00:36:18.720 But it's

00:36:20.500 a weird

00:36:21.200 time to be

00:36:21.860 consistent.

00:36:23.800 A weird

00:36:24.180 time to do

00:36:24.740 it.

00:36:25.660 At the same

00:36:26.180 time, Joe

00:36:28.000 Biden was

00:36:28.580 giving his

00:36:29.200 celebrating the

00:36:33.060 end of

00:36:33.480 inflation, while

00:36:34.800 even CNN was

00:36:35.860 showing at the

00:36:36.680 same time the

00:36:37.960 stock market

00:36:38.660 plunging 1,200

00:36:39.560 points because

00:36:41.020 nobody believed

00:36:41.920 that inflation

00:36:42.900 is done because

00:36:43.680 the new numbers

00:36:44.340 were so bad.

00:36:45.700 They were so

00:36:46.260 bad, but they

00:36:46.880 were not good.

00:36:48.720 Now, watching

00:36:50.320 the images of

00:36:53.920 all those happy

00:36:54.580 Democrats

00:36:55.200 celebrating when

00:36:56.240 the world was

00:36:56.840 burning was

00:36:58.660 just the worst.

00:36:59.940 Just the worst.

00:37:01.040 And Dana

00:37:01.460 Perino did the

00:37:02.920 best job of

00:37:03.800 eviscerating the

00:37:05.460 Democrats on

00:37:06.240 this.

00:37:06.840 As she noted,

00:37:08.420 before you put

00:37:09.200 on an event,

00:37:10.920 check the

00:37:11.400 calendar.

00:37:12.860 Basic stuff.

00:37:14.440 Check the

00:37:14.940 calendar.

00:37:15.880 You don't want

00:37:16.300 to put on this

00:37:16.840 event the same

00:37:17.480 day the numbers

00:37:18.080 were coming

00:37:18.400 out.

00:37:19.480 If you'd

00:37:20.060 even waited

00:37:20.540 one day or

00:37:21.460 done it one

00:37:22.460 day before,

00:37:23.880 then it's not

00:37:25.000 so much a

00:37:25.520 story.

00:37:26.320 But having the

00:37:27.040 same day as

00:37:27.620 the numbers,

00:37:28.480 that was a

00:37:29.500 risky play.

00:37:32.080 Well, another

00:37:34.020 thing that I

00:37:34.520 learned in the

00:37:35.080 news today is

00:37:36.140 did you know

00:37:36.680 it's illegal to

00:37:37.840 kill people in

00:37:38.500 their sleep, 1.00

00:37:39.620 even if they

00:37:41.100 have it coming?

00:37:43.360 That just

00:37:44.140 feels like it

00:37:44.740 shouldn't be a

00:37:45.200 law.

00:37:45.400 So the

00:37:46.600 specific here is

00:37:47.780 there was a

00:37:48.360 15-year-old

00:37:49.140 girl who

00:37:51.040 was repeatedly 0.90

00:37:52.040 raped by a 0.99

00:37:53.420 man in his 0.70

00:37:53.960 30s, and

00:37:55.980 at one point

00:37:56.680 at knife

00:37:57.520 point.

00:37:58.920 So there was

00:37:59.520 violence involved.

00:38:00.780 We're not

00:38:01.420 talking about

00:38:01.840 statutory rape,

00:38:03.360 so it's not

00:38:03.980 just that she

00:38:04.780 was underage.

00:38:06.080 She was 0.66

00:38:06.580 actually raped 0.96

00:38:08.000 by force 0.90

00:38:08.600 at knife

00:38:10.580 point.

00:38:10.860 At one

00:38:11.840 point, the

00:38:12.240 guy fell

00:38:12.660 asleep, and

00:38:14.520 she got

00:38:14.920 access to

00:38:15.460 the knife

00:38:15.820 that was

00:38:16.040 on the

00:38:16.460 bedstand or

00:38:17.440 something, and

00:38:18.680 she stabbed 0.96

00:38:19.400 him to death 0.63

00:38:20.100 as he

00:38:21.600 presumably woke

00:38:22.960 up while he

00:38:23.420 was being

00:38:23.680 stabbed to

00:38:24.140 death. 0.97

00:38:25.160 And she

00:38:25.840 was convicted

00:38:26.480 of involuntary

00:38:29.420 manslaughter and

00:38:30.480 willful injury.

00:38:32.440 She won't

00:38:33.400 necessarily serve

00:38:34.460 time in jail,

00:38:35.340 so she

00:38:38.880 looks like

00:38:39.360 she's going

00:38:39.700 to get a

00:38:40.240 deferred prison

00:38:40.980 sentence.

00:38:42.040 But she

00:38:42.460 could serve

00:38:42.920 10 years if

00:38:43.800 she violates 1.00

00:38:44.380 probation, up

00:38:45.400 to 20, I

00:38:45.960 think.

00:38:46.840 But here's

00:38:47.420 the weird

00:38:47.720 part.

00:38:48.100 Iowa has

00:38:48.760 this mandatory

00:38:49.500 rule that

00:38:51.240 if you're

00:38:51.680 found guilty

00:38:52.280 of this

00:38:52.720 crime and

00:38:53.420 this kind

00:38:54.000 of situation,

00:38:54.760 as she

00:38:55.100 was, that

00:38:56.800 she has to

00:38:58.500 pay the

00:38:58.880 family of

00:38:59.600 the deceased

00:39:00.340 $150,000

00:39:02.260 in restitution.

00:39:03.960 I'm not

00:39:04.300 sure how they

00:39:04.800 calculate it.

00:39:05.340 So she

00:39:07.340 has to pay 0.96

00:39:08.000 her rapist

00:39:09.020 $150,000. 1.00

00:39:11.760 They rape his 0.99

00:39:12.200 family because 1.00

00:39:12.760 he's dead.

00:39:14.560 Now, let

00:39:16.100 me ask you

00:39:16.520 this.

00:39:18.220 What is the

00:39:19.060 definition of

00:39:19.840 self-defense?

00:39:21.460 Now, here

00:39:21.900 clearly it's

00:39:22.640 being defined

00:39:23.320 as not

00:39:23.960 immediate

00:39:24.420 danger.

00:39:25.840 But if

00:39:26.420 you've been

00:39:26.840 repeatedly 1.00

00:39:27.800 raped by 0.99

00:39:29.460 a guy with 0.99

00:39:29.980 a knife,

00:39:31.500 and he

00:39:32.440 falls asleep

00:39:33.100 for a minute,

00:39:33.680 and you 0.99

00:39:33.920 knife him 1.00

00:39:34.320 to death, 1.00

00:39:34.720 are you

00:39:35.540 telling me

00:39:35.880 that's not

00:39:36.300 self-defense?

00:39:38.640 Because I

00:39:39.380 get the

00:39:39.740 whole it's

00:39:40.380 not a

00:39:40.720 media thing,

00:39:41.980 but it's

00:39:43.000 guaranteed.

00:39:45.880 If it's

00:39:46.580 guaranteed but

00:39:47.500 not immediate,

00:39:48.280 you can't

00:39:48.740 kill somebody?

00:39:50.180 It's guaranteed 0.99

00:39:51.060 that when he

00:39:52.300 wakes up he's

00:39:52.900 still going to 1.00

00:39:53.260 be a rapist. 1.00

00:39:54.180 If you put 1.00

00:39:56.840 me on that

00:39:57.380 jury, I

00:39:58.820 would have 0.98

00:39:59.140 hung that

00:39:59.660 jury so

00:40:00.260 hard.

00:40:02.340 There would

00:40:03.260 be no way

00:40:03.800 in the world

00:40:04.100 they'd ever

00:40:04.540 get me to

00:40:05.000 vote guilty

00:40:05.740 on anything.

00:40:07.480 Now, I get,

00:40:08.820 I've been on

00:40:09.360 juries, so I

00:40:10.740 know the judge

00:40:11.520 would make

00:40:12.160 sure that you

00:40:12.740 knew it's

00:40:13.380 not your

00:40:13.840 duty to

00:40:16.260 find justice.

00:40:17.700 That's not

00:40:18.160 the job of

00:40:18.720 the juries.

00:40:19.840 The juries

00:40:20.360 are not

00:40:20.980 there to

00:40:21.380 find justice.

00:40:22.600 That is not

00:40:23.140 their job.

00:40:24.520 They're there

00:40:24.960 to determine

00:40:25.620 if the

00:40:26.100 evidence

00:40:26.560 demonstrated

00:40:28.120 that the

00:40:28.520 crime had

00:40:28.980 been committed.

00:40:30.420 That's it.

00:40:31.720 And it looks

00:40:32.320 like that's

00:40:32.740 what they

00:40:33.000 did.

00:40:34.320 And I've

00:40:35.020 often said

00:40:35.520 that serving

00:40:36.240 jury duty

00:40:36.940 should be

00:40:38.260 just something

00:40:39.340 you should

00:40:39.660 all do.

00:40:40.720 Just to

00:40:41.260 feel how

00:40:42.040 serious the

00:40:43.560 people in

00:40:43.980 the jury

00:40:44.360 take this

00:40:45.180 stuff.

00:40:46.120 Like, until

00:40:46.540 you feel how

00:40:47.220 serious your

00:40:48.700 fellow citizens

00:40:49.460 are about

00:40:50.060 getting it

00:40:50.560 right on

00:40:51.280 a jury, you

00:40:52.520 don't feel

00:40:53.220 the country's

00:40:54.180 cohesiveness.

00:40:55.580 It's easy to

00:40:56.400 feel like we're

00:40:57.220 not together.

00:40:58.400 But boy, you

00:40:59.040 take 12

00:40:59.680 strangers from

00:41:01.220 any demographic

00:41:03.120 group, you

00:41:04.540 put them

00:41:04.920 together and

00:41:05.440 you say,

00:41:05.900 you're in

00:41:06.200 charge of

00:41:07.280 this guy

00:41:07.700 going to

00:41:08.140 jail or

00:41:08.660 not.

00:41:09.800 They take

00:41:10.520 that job 0.53

00:41:11.020 really seriously.

00:41:12.920 And when

00:41:13.200 you see that,

00:41:14.180 that gives

00:41:14.600 you faith in

00:41:15.360 the whole thing.

00:41:16.140 So it's a

00:41:16.600 very important

00:41:17.020 process.

00:41:17.540 If you want

00:41:17.880 to be a

00:41:18.140 good patriot,

00:41:19.340 good citizen,

00:41:20.480 do jury duty

00:41:21.900 at least once.

00:41:23.180 You've got to

00:41:23.880 experience it.

00:41:26.080 But anyway,

00:41:26.740 you put me

00:41:27.280 on that jury

00:41:27.880 and I

00:41:28.520 wouldn't give 0.99

00:41:28.900 a fuck 0.99

00:41:29.400 what the 1.00

00:41:29.740 Constitution

00:41:30.120 said.

00:41:31.380 I wouldn't

00:41:32.220 care what

00:41:32.700 the law

00:41:33.160 said.

00:41:33.660 I wouldn't

00:41:34.040 care how

00:41:34.580 many angry

00:41:35.360 jurors there

00:41:36.040 were who

00:41:36.480 waited too

00:41:36.940 long.

00:41:37.900 There is

00:41:38.320 no way,

00:41:39.760 no way,

00:41:41.140 I would

00:41:41.580 have allowed

00:41:43.120 this 15

00:41:44.620 year old

00:41:45.040 girl who

00:41:45.560 ended her 0.82

00:41:46.180 own horror

00:41:46.760 by stabbing 0.99

00:41:47.500 to death 1.00

00:41:47.920 the fucker 1.00

00:41:48.880 who had 1.00

00:41:49.180 raped her. 1.00

00:41:50.280 I would 1.00

00:41:50.860 give her

00:41:51.200 an award.

00:41:52.460 There's no

00:41:53.080 way.

00:41:54.160 You could

00:41:54.640 not torture

00:41:55.300 me enough

00:41:55.880 to vote

00:41:57.000 guilty on

00:41:57.500 this case.

00:41:58.000 Am I

00:41:59.520 wrong?

00:42:00.780 How many

00:42:01.420 of you

00:42:02.540 would allow

00:42:03.300 her to 0.94

00:42:03.700 be convicted?

00:42:08.140 Yeah.

00:42:09.120 How did

00:42:09.660 they find

00:42:10.040 12 people

00:42:10.620 who were

00:42:10.920 willing to

00:42:11.320 do this?

00:42:12.460 And I

00:42:12.680 think the

00:42:13.000 answer is,

00:42:14.260 so here's

00:42:14.720 the answer.

00:42:16.160 Once you

00:42:16.800 get in that

00:42:17.300 situation,

00:42:18.620 you take it

00:42:19.660 so seriously

00:42:20.600 that you

00:42:21.840 do end up

00:42:22.640 respecting the

00:42:23.660 system over

00:42:24.260 the person.

00:42:25.840 And I

00:42:26.100 think that's

00:42:26.460 what happened.

00:42:27.640 I think the

00:42:28.140 people who

00:42:28.520 were there

00:42:28.720 respected the

00:42:29.540 system.

00:42:30.760 And I

00:42:31.140 don't hate

00:42:31.600 that.

00:42:32.560 I don't

00:42:33.220 hate that

00:42:33.760 because I

00:42:34.360 like them

00:42:34.740 respecting that

00:42:35.440 system.

00:42:36.400 But it

00:42:37.120 cost her

00:42:38.640 some justice.

00:42:40.420 This was

00:42:40.720 not justice.

00:42:42.480 Was not

00:42:43.200 justice.

00:42:45.060 All right.

00:42:46.840 CNN is

00:42:47.540 reporting that

00:42:48.040 more than

00:42:48.740 half of the

00:42:49.280 GOP Senate

00:42:49.920 candidates

00:42:50.520 doubted the

00:42:52.640 2020 election.

00:42:54.540 That sounds

00:42:54.980 about right.

00:42:56.640 Half of them

00:42:57.200 doubted it.

00:42:57.760 But again,

00:42:59.680 they didn't

00:43:00.140 use the

00:43:00.460 word denier.

00:43:02.580 I think

00:43:03.240 doubt is

00:43:03.760 fair.

00:43:05.720 Don't you

00:43:06.320 think?

00:43:07.000 I think

00:43:07.480 people can

00:43:07.940 have doubt

00:43:08.480 about

00:43:08.920 institutions

00:43:09.580 which are

00:43:10.180 part of a

00:43:11.120 system which

00:43:11.940 is entirely

00:43:12.640 non-credible.

00:43:18.880 I don't know.

00:43:19.620 I'm not

00:43:19.900 worried about

00:43:20.340 that.

00:43:21.880 I'm not

00:43:22.500 worried about

00:43:23.020 half of them

00:43:23.880 doubting an

00:43:24.760 election.

00:43:25.040 Are you?

00:43:29.720 Does that

00:43:30.260 bother anybody 0.58

00:43:30.840 that half

00:43:31.520 of those

00:43:31.800 candidates

00:43:32.240 doubted the

00:43:33.080 2020 election?

00:43:35.140 That doesn't

00:43:35.760 bother me at

00:43:36.180 all.

00:43:39.040 Yeah,

00:43:39.460 not at all.

00:43:44.340 There was a

00:43:45.180 hilarious

00:43:45.680 trending thing.

00:43:48.200 Erin Burnett

00:43:48.940 from CNN,

00:43:49.760 her name was

00:43:50.260 trending on

00:43:50.860 Twitter.

00:43:51.960 So I thought,

00:43:52.700 oh, let's

00:43:53.080 see what this

00:43:53.480 is.

00:43:54.340 And I go

00:43:54.740 there and

00:43:55.260 it was,

00:43:57.180 she was

00:43:58.660 trending because

00:43:59.500 she was

00:43:59.900 talking about

00:44:00.520 the Hunter

00:44:01.100 Biden laptop

00:44:02.440 and how it

00:44:04.240 wasn't Russian

00:44:05.220 disinformation.

00:44:08.080 And, you

00:44:08.420 know,

00:44:08.580 basically she

00:44:09.360 told the

00:44:10.380 story the

00:44:11.700 way you

00:44:12.020 know the

00:44:12.380 story.

00:44:13.680 What do

00:44:14.240 you think

00:44:14.540 CNN viewers

00:44:15.500 did when

00:44:16.740 Erin Burnett

00:44:17.500 accurately told

00:44:18.720 a story of

00:44:19.520 great importance

00:44:20.280 to the

00:44:20.660 country?

00:44:20.940 how did

00:44:22.440 the CNN

00:44:22.880 viewers

00:44:23.500 handle an

00:44:25.760 objective

00:44:26.260 reporting of

00:44:27.300 true news

00:44:28.060 that is

00:44:29.140 important to

00:44:29.700 the country?

00:44:31.460 Re,

00:44:32.780 re,

00:44:33.940 I'm never

00:44:34.800 watching this

00:44:35.420 channel again.

00:44:37.280 And you

00:44:38.440 have to read

00:44:39.060 the comments

00:44:39.740 to even know

00:44:41.460 that these

00:44:41.860 people exist.

00:44:43.040 And when I

00:44:43.360 say these

00:44:43.800 people,

00:44:44.980 I mean,

00:44:45.540 apparently,

00:44:47.040 this is just

00:44:47.660 my interpretation

00:44:48.320 from the

00:44:48.900 comments,

00:44:50.300 there were

00:44:51.700 quite a

00:44:52.620 number of

00:44:53.060 people who

00:44:53.500 watched CNN

00:44:54.140 who were

00:44:55.560 not aware

00:44:56.300 that it

00:44:58.140 was trying

00:44:58.620 to be

00:44:58.960 news.

00:45:02.460 I don't

00:45:03.120 think they

00:45:03.480 understood

00:45:03.840 that.

00:45:04.780 I think

00:45:05.240 they understood

00:45:05.800 it as a

00:45:06.540 team member.

00:45:08.500 And as

00:45:08.900 soon as the

00:45:09.400 team member

00:45:09.960 started giving

00:45:10.680 news,

00:45:11.600 they were

00:45:11.720 like,

00:45:11.940 whoa,

00:45:12.860 that's not

00:45:13.260 what we

00:45:13.560 signed up

00:45:14.020 for.

00:45:14.920 We signed

00:45:15.600 up for you

00:45:15.960 to be on

00:45:16.240 our team.

00:45:16.660 Why are

00:45:17.960 you on

00:45:18.200 the other

00:45:18.440 team?

00:45:19.180 And if

00:45:19.400 you look

00:45:20.200 at the

00:45:20.500 comments,

00:45:21.680 it's entirely

00:45:22.380 clear that

00:45:23.740 the reason

00:45:24.340 they're angry

00:45:25.000 is that

00:45:27.040 their team

00:45:27.480 isn't being

00:45:27.940 supported.

00:45:29.220 They're not

00:45:29.940 angry about

00:45:30.520 the accuracy

00:45:31.140 of the

00:45:31.500 news.

00:45:32.500 They're not

00:45:33.200 complaining

00:45:33.640 that it's

00:45:33.960 not true.

00:45:35.240 And they're

00:45:35.560 not complaining

00:45:36.160 that it's

00:45:36.460 not important.

00:45:37.780 They're only

00:45:38.340 complaining that

00:45:39.580 they didn't

00:45:39.960 back their

00:45:40.420 side.

00:45:41.800 And they're

00:45:42.160 acting like

00:45:42.620 that's the

00:45:43.020 job of a 0.65

00:45:43.560 news entity.

00:45:45.420 But, you

00:45:46.640 know, that's

00:45:47.000 CNN's own

00:45:47.600 fault, right?

00:45:48.780 CNN created

00:45:49.840 a product that

00:45:51.720 even the people

00:45:52.480 who watched

00:45:53.000 it knew was

00:45:54.620 not news.

00:45:56.220 Think about

00:45:56.840 that.

00:45:58.020 Their own

00:45:58.560 viewers knew

00:45:59.100 it wasn't

00:45:59.460 news.

00:46:00.240 I wasn't

00:46:00.660 sure that

00:46:01.020 was true.

00:46:02.260 But now we

00:46:02.920 have something

00:46:03.600 like confirmation.

00:46:05.200 Didn't you

00:46:05.460 always wonder?

00:46:06.220 Didn't you

00:46:06.840 always wonder

00:46:07.480 if CNN

00:46:08.140 viewers,

00:46:09.040 let's say

00:46:09.460 all of

00:46:10.020 them,

00:46:10.860 believed they

00:46:11.580 were watching

00:46:12.100 actual news?

00:46:13.020 But it

00:46:14.560 turns out

00:46:14.920 that they

00:46:15.220 knew they

00:46:15.500 weren't

00:46:15.700 watching actual

00:46:16.300 news.

00:46:16.620 They knew

00:46:16.860 it was

00:46:17.080 just team

00:46:17.620 play.

00:46:19.220 Now you

00:46:19.740 see the

00:46:20.060 same thing

00:46:20.520 with Fox

00:46:21.220 News.

00:46:22.300 So I'm

00:46:22.820 going to 0.99

00:46:23.380 burn all 0.96

00:46:23.880 of my 0.71

00:46:24.120 bridges

00:46:24.360 here.

00:46:25.680 When Fox

00:46:26.580 News reports

00:46:27.300 a story

00:46:27.860 down the

00:46:28.620 middle,

00:46:29.760 you see

00:46:30.400 all the

00:46:30.680 screaming.

00:46:32.460 People go

00:46:33.180 nuts.

00:46:34.000 Oh no,

00:46:34.800 that was an

00:46:35.280 objective

00:46:35.680 statement there.

00:46:36.480 I can't

00:46:36.780 handle that.

00:46:37.620 I will

00:46:37.940 never watch

00:46:38.480 your network

00:46:38.960 again.

00:46:40.100 So just

00:46:40.940 like the

00:46:41.740 Fox News

00:46:42.280 viewers,

00:46:42.640 there's no

00:46:43.080 difference.

00:46:44.040 The CNN

00:46:44.480 viewers are

00:46:45.160 watching what

00:46:46.140 should be

00:46:47.440 news.

00:46:48.460 They're just

00:46:49.120 watching it

00:46:49.640 as a team

00:46:50.780 member.

00:46:53.620 This is a

00:46:58.100 funny story.

00:46:59.560 I forget

00:47:00.220 where I saw

00:47:00.640 this.

00:47:01.120 I wish I

00:47:01.540 remembered.

00:47:02.660 But apparently

00:47:03.300 there are

00:47:03.840 phrases that

00:47:04.820 are turning

00:47:05.240 off younger

00:47:05.920 job seekers.

00:47:09.780 I don't

00:47:11.380 know if

00:47:11.640 this is true

00:47:12.180 at all.

00:47:12.640 because everybody

00:47:14.520 always complains

00:47:15.260 about the

00:47:15.620 next generation.

00:47:16.960 So take it

00:47:17.520 with a grain

00:47:17.920 of salt how

00:47:18.440 much of

00:47:18.720 this is true.

00:47:20.100 But anecdotally

00:47:20.860 it's just

00:47:21.240 funny so I'm

00:47:21.840 going to

00:47:21.920 report it

00:47:22.340 like it's

00:47:22.700 true.

00:47:24.500 But apparently

00:47:25.280 the young

00:47:25.800 people who

00:47:26.300 are not so

00:47:26.900 big on

00:47:27.500 working too

00:47:28.620 hard,

00:47:29.660 they're looking

00:47:30.160 for more of

00:47:30.680 a work-life

00:47:31.340 balance.

00:47:32.160 Nothing wrong

00:47:32.580 with that.

00:47:35.260 There's some

00:47:35.920 phrases that

00:47:36.660 they see in

00:47:37.080 job postings

00:47:38.820 that scare

00:47:39.680 them away.

00:47:41.560 So here's

00:47:42.240 some of the

00:47:43.480 things you

00:47:43.840 shouldn't put

00:47:44.320 in your job

00:47:44.880 posting if

00:47:45.900 you want

00:47:46.220 anybody under

00:47:47.040 30 to

00:47:47.600 apply.

00:47:50.140 You don't

00:47:50.980 want to say

00:47:51.480 must handle

00:47:52.140 stress well.

00:47:52.880 you don't

00:47:56.400 want to say

00:47:56.880 willing to

00:47:57.900 wear many

00:47:58.440 hats.

00:48:00.760 You don't

00:48:01.460 want to say

00:48:02.080 responsibilities

00:48:03.880 may include

00:48:04.860 those outside

00:48:06.200 the job

00:48:06.640 description.

00:48:08.680 And here's

00:48:09.400 one that's

00:48:09.780 funny.

00:48:10.720 We're one

00:48:11.220 big happy

00:48:11.720 family.

00:48:16.760 And the

00:48:17.520 reason given

00:48:18.180 for why

00:48:20.100 young people

00:48:21.080 don't want

00:48:21.560 to see

00:48:21.840 we're one

00:48:22.340 big happy

00:48:22.820 family because

00:48:24.860 it suggests

00:48:26.160 they're going

00:48:26.480 to abuse 0.77

00:48:26.880 you.

00:48:34.220 One big

00:48:34.980 happy family

00:48:35.660 makes young

00:48:36.500 people think

00:48:37.040 that that's

00:48:38.100 a signal for

00:48:38.700 abuse.

00:48:41.500 Maybe it

00:48:42.220 is.

00:48:42.500 That's even

00:48:42.860 funnier.

00:48:44.800 Another one

00:48:45.580 is applicants

00:48:46.800 should be

00:48:47.460 humble.

00:48:48.400 Have you

00:48:48.720 ever heard

00:48:49.060 that before?

00:48:50.880 Whoever

00:48:51.400 says applicants

00:48:52.240 should be

00:48:52.700 humble.

00:48:53.060 I've never

00:48:53.340 heard that

00:48:53.760 one.

00:48:54.760 But I

00:48:55.440 wouldn't work

00:48:56.380 at a job

00:48:56.820 that required

00:48:57.360 it.

00:48:58.440 Because I

00:48:59.380 don't think

00:48:59.940 I could pull

00:49:01.560 it off.

00:49:06.020 All right.

00:49:07.360 Also,

00:49:07.820 bad ones are

00:49:09.060 looking for

00:49:09.640 self-starters.

00:49:13.640 Nobody wants

00:49:14.400 to be a

00:49:14.720 self-starter.

00:49:15.300 Okay, this

00:49:20.860 was a survey

00:49:22.580 by payroll

00:49:23.500 processor

00:49:24.100 paychecks.

00:49:26.400 Oh, God,

00:49:27.180 that's funny.

00:49:27.560 So, do you

00:49:38.140 remember when

00:49:38.800 Hillary Clinton's

00:49:40.560 lawyer,

00:49:41.980 Sussman,

00:49:43.020 he was

00:49:43.940 accused of

00:49:44.780 lying to

00:49:45.420 the FBI

00:49:46.100 in saying

00:49:48.020 that,

00:49:49.040 no, I'm

00:49:50.440 not high in

00:49:51.280 case you're

00:49:51.580 wondering.

00:49:52.420 He was

00:49:53.020 accused of

00:49:53.400 lying to the

00:49:53.880 FBI and

00:49:54.940 saying that

00:49:55.380 he was not

00:49:56.020 working for

00:49:56.620 Clinton when

00:49:58.260 he brought

00:49:58.640 them information

00:49:59.720 that was

00:50:00.320 maybe bad

00:50:00.980 about Trump.

00:50:02.840 And do you

00:50:03.300 remember he

00:50:03.680 went, so

00:50:04.660 he was

00:50:05.740 taken to

00:50:07.580 trial.

00:50:09.220 Do you

00:50:09.560 know what

00:50:10.120 happened in

00:50:10.560 the trial?

00:50:11.800 How many

00:50:12.240 of you know

00:50:12.940 what happened

00:50:14.080 with Sussman?

00:50:14.780 Don't look

00:50:15.140 it up.

00:50:16.220 And don't

00:50:16.500 say the

00:50:16.820 answer.

00:50:17.120 Just say

00:50:17.400 if you

00:50:17.640 know.

00:50:18.600 Do you

00:50:18.820 know what

00:50:19.620 the end

00:50:20.020 of the

00:50:20.240 result was?

00:50:24.180 Yeah,

00:50:24.500 D.C.

00:50:24.920 jury is

00:50:25.240 part of

00:50:25.500 it.

00:50:25.640 It's a

00:50:25.940 hint.

00:50:27.300 I just

00:50:27.500 wondered

00:50:27.740 how, oh

00:50:28.780 most of

00:50:29.080 you knew.

00:50:30.040 Yeah, okay.

00:50:31.220 Most of

00:50:31.540 the people

00:50:31.740 are locals

00:50:32.160 now.

00:50:33.000 On

00:50:33.320 YouTube, you

00:50:33.960 see yes

00:50:34.320 and no.

00:50:34.740 The answer

00:50:35.240 is that he

00:50:35.840 was acquitted.

00:50:37.860 That's it.

00:50:38.480 He didn't,

00:50:39.160 according to

00:50:39.680 the legal

00:50:40.060 system, he

00:50:41.240 is a person

00:50:41.800 who did

00:50:42.280 not commit

00:50:42.840 a crime.

00:50:43.860 It wasn't

00:50:44.300 a hung

00:50:44.580 jury.

00:50:46.140 It wasn't

00:50:46.560 a hung

00:50:46.880 jury.

00:50:47.420 Twelve

00:50:47.780 jurors said

00:50:48.480 no, he

00:50:48.800 did not

00:50:49.120 commit a

00:50:49.480 crime.

00:50:50.480 Did you

00:50:50.820 see that

00:50:51.200 coming?

00:50:52.560 And I

00:50:53.080 think it

00:50:53.280 had to do

00:50:53.660 with the

00:50:53.920 fact that he

00:50:54.500 was in

00:50:54.800 the room

00:50:55.140 with only

00:50:55.520 one person

00:50:56.300 when the

00:50:59.040 alleged claim

00:51:00.700 was made.

00:51:01.780 So I

00:51:02.300 believe his

00:51:02.760 defense was

00:51:03.520 I say it

00:51:05.220 didn't happen,

00:51:05.940 the one

00:51:06.240 person in

00:51:06.620 the room

00:51:06.820 says it

00:51:07.240 did,

00:51:08.040 that's your

00:51:08.560 whole case.

00:51:11.080 And if I

00:51:11.840 were on the

00:51:12.220 jury and that

00:51:12.900 was the

00:51:13.240 evidence, the

00:51:14.320 one person in

00:51:14.980 the room said

00:51:15.460 it happened,

00:51:16.680 the other

00:51:17.040 person in

00:51:17.460 the room said

00:51:17.880 it didn't

00:51:18.180 happen, I

00:51:20.160 would have

00:51:20.940 acquitted.

00:51:21.880 Wouldn't

00:51:22.140 you?

00:51:22.300 Now this

00:51:23.900 isn't like

00:51:24.420 the woman 0.98

00:51:25.540 who stabbed

00:51:26.280 her rapist 0.98

00:51:27.100 to death, 1.00

00:51:28.020 because that

00:51:28.480 was justice. 0.95

00:51:29.700 Killing that

00:51:30.200 guy was 1.00

00:51:30.520 justice.

00:51:31.400 But if it's

00:51:32.140 a little

00:51:32.360 paperworky lie

00:51:34.120 kind of a

00:51:34.680 thing, I

00:51:35.700 think I

00:51:36.040 would favor

00:51:36.660 the system

00:51:37.380 over punishing

00:51:39.920 an individual.

00:51:41.520 And the

00:51:42.180 system is

00:51:42.740 pretty clear.

00:51:43.420 You need

00:51:43.760 evidence for

00:51:44.440 crimes.

00:51:46.140 They didn't

00:51:46.720 have it.

00:51:47.080 They had

00:51:48.800 one witness,

00:51:49.580 but it

00:51:49.760 wasn't

00:51:50.000 enough, so

00:51:50.720 he walked.

00:51:54.580 But now

00:51:55.260 Durham is

00:51:56.120 winding down,

00:51:56.980 it looks like,

00:51:57.640 and it looks

00:51:58.220 like there

00:51:58.540 won't be any

00:51:59.180 attempted

00:52:00.300 prosecutions.

00:52:02.540 So did

00:52:03.480 you think

00:52:03.780 that Durham

00:52:04.220 was going

00:52:04.620 to uncover

00:52:05.220 the deep

00:52:05.720 state and

00:52:06.440 find all

00:52:07.860 the bad

00:52:08.220 things they

00:52:08.640 did?

00:52:09.580 Looks like

00:52:10.400 he may

00:52:10.780 have found

00:52:11.360 out a lot

00:52:11.760 of information,

00:52:13.100 but the

00:52:14.160 early signals

00:52:15.040 could be

00:52:15.420 wrong,

00:52:15.900 could be

00:52:16.280 wrong.

00:52:17.080 But the

00:52:17.320 early indications

00:52:18.080 are nobody's

00:52:18.780 going to get

00:52:19.100 charged with

00:52:19.620 anything

00:52:19.900 additionally.

00:52:22.440 So, but

00:52:25.300 in the

00:52:26.160 process, they

00:52:26.840 discovered that

00:52:27.720 Igor

00:52:28.680 Denchenko, who

00:52:31.420 worked with

00:52:32.280 Christopher Steele

00:52:33.820 to develop the

00:52:34.660 Russia collusion

00:52:35.340 stuff.

00:52:36.720 So, Christopher

00:52:37.620 Steele talked

00:52:38.320 to some

00:52:39.920 Russians.

00:52:41.260 One of the

00:52:41.780 Russians he 1.00

00:52:42.280 talked to, to

00:52:42.920 get information

00:52:43.600 that was fake,

00:52:45.420 but it was put

00:52:46.240 in the Steele

00:52:46.740 dossier to

00:52:47.580 get at

00:52:48.400 Trump, that

00:52:49.540 one of the

00:52:50.020 Russians they 0.99

00:52:50.620 talked to was

00:52:51.280 on the FBI

00:52:52.380 payroll.

00:52:57.840 We're just

00:52:58.620 finding that

00:52:59.200 out.

00:53:00.860 The Christopher

00:53:01.560 Steele source

00:53:02.480 was the FBI

00:53:03.680 itself.

00:53:06.680 Now, not

00:53:07.420 really, because

00:53:08.580 it was a paid

00:53:09.140 informant,

00:53:09.820 right?

00:53:10.060 But basically, he

00:53:14.600 got information

00:53:15.400 from the FBI

00:53:16.360 and gave it to

00:53:17.000 the FBI.

00:53:19.440 And we're just

00:53:20.280 finding that out

00:53:20.960 now.

00:53:21.920 Now, of course,

00:53:22.400 it was fake

00:53:22.840 information that

00:53:24.240 he got from the

00:53:24.940 FBI to give to

00:53:25.780 the FBI.

00:53:27.320 But that started

00:53:28.160 off the whole

00:53:28.680 thing.

00:53:31.060 Now, again,

00:53:32.360 you know, fog

00:53:32.900 of war, who

00:53:33.380 knows, maybe

00:53:33.960 some of the

00:53:34.360 details here are

00:53:35.320 exculpatory, but

00:53:36.360 that all sounds

00:53:37.640 pretty bad.

00:53:39.560 Jonathan Turley

00:53:40.280 writes about

00:53:40.840 this, so look

00:53:42.020 for Jonathan

00:53:42.680 Turley's piece

00:53:43.680 if you want to

00:53:44.840 see the smart

00:53:45.660 lawyer take on

00:53:46.380 it.

00:53:49.000 All right.

00:53:51.220 And that,

00:53:52.000 ladies and 0.98

00:53:52.380 gentlemen, brings

00:53:54.220 us to near the

00:53:54.900 conclusion of what

00:53:56.140 was the finest

00:53:56.900 live stream in

00:53:58.240 the history of

00:53:59.200 all things.

00:54:02.520 Best show

00:54:03.120 ever.

00:54:04.740 How do I feel

00:54:05.340 about, um,

00:54:07.080 Turley?

00:54:07.760 He's the best.

00:54:09.340 He does great

00:54:10.280 writing and

00:54:11.060 analysis.

00:54:14.480 Yeah, here's

00:54:15.260 another thing you

00:54:16.040 shouldn't trust.

00:54:17.880 Podesta in

00:54:18.640 charge of $300

00:54:19.640 billion in

00:54:20.680 climate stuff.

00:54:22.880 Let me give you

00:54:23.640 some optimism.

00:54:24.500 You want some

00:54:24.880 optimism?

00:54:27.360 There's one

00:54:28.800 technology that's

00:54:32.440 probably going to

00:54:33.240 be, well,

00:54:33.820 besides AI.

00:54:34.540 there's one

00:54:35.860 technology that's,

00:54:37.780 you know, there's

00:54:38.360 a lot of action

00:54:38.940 in, and it's

00:54:40.380 going to change

00:54:40.820 everything, or

00:54:42.520 not, depending on

00:54:44.380 where the

00:54:44.700 technology ends.

00:54:46.100 And that's

00:54:46.800 battery technology,

00:54:48.040 especially mass

00:54:48.940 storage, not just

00:54:50.000 for your car, but

00:54:51.360 for the network,

00:54:52.300 like, you know,

00:54:52.760 giant batteries for

00:54:53.880 storing network

00:54:55.980 power.

00:54:56.380 And it turns out

00:54:58.140 there's a bunch of

00:54:59.120 companies, and I

00:55:00.000 keep doing little

00:55:01.280 research on each

00:55:02.140 one as they pop

00:55:02.960 up.

00:55:03.820 And once you start

00:55:04.880 looking into them,

00:55:06.400 and then you also

00:55:07.480 know that part of

00:55:08.440 that infrastructure

00:55:09.380 bill that Biden

00:55:10.600 got through, a big

00:55:12.160 part of that is for

00:55:12.960 battery development.

00:55:15.320 So a big part of it

00:55:16.280 is to keep these

00:55:17.200 startups who are

00:55:18.260 making new kinds of

00:55:19.060 batteries in business.

00:55:20.020 Because the current

00:55:21.040 batteries that they

00:55:22.320 use in cars, it

00:55:24.440 looks like the

00:55:25.140 total worldwide

00:55:26.120 supply of materials

00:55:27.720 to make them is

00:55:29.080 about this big, and

00:55:31.220 the number of

00:55:32.120 electric cars that we

00:55:33.180 think we want is

00:55:34.200 this big, and

00:55:35.640 they're not even

00:55:36.040 close.

00:55:37.540 So we're like maybe

00:55:39.140 1%, something like

00:55:41.940 that, probably 1%

00:55:43.240 to 3% of the

00:55:46.720 batteries that we'll

00:55:47.500 need to have a

00:55:49.080 world is, you

00:55:50.640 know, where the

00:55:51.800 power is always on

00:55:53.000 and you're not

00:55:53.780 burning coal,

00:55:55.060 basically.

00:55:56.500 But the good news

00:55:57.720 is this.

00:55:59.180 It seems to be

00:56:00.180 well-funded.

00:56:01.900 You know, the

00:56:02.200 government's billions

00:56:03.120 are going in that

00:56:04.100 direction.

00:56:04.960 But they also have

00:56:05.940 private funding.

00:56:07.400 And a number of

00:56:08.140 these technologies

00:56:08.840 look pretty good.

00:56:10.380 Look pretty good.

00:56:10.940 So a number of

00:56:12.140 technologies have

00:56:12.940 already gotten to

00:56:14.240 the point where

00:56:14.660 they've developed a

00:56:15.600 working battery.

00:56:17.360 And from working

00:56:18.300 battery to,

00:56:19.080 you know, being

00:56:20.520 able to scale up

00:56:21.420 to make lots of

00:56:22.160 them and sell them

00:56:22.860 and stuff is a lot

00:56:23.520 of work.

00:56:24.340 So the odds of

00:56:25.340 getting from a

00:56:25.980 working prototype

00:56:27.200 to a big industry

00:56:29.420 important company

00:56:30.720 is small.

00:56:32.720 Small.

00:56:33.760 Now, everybody

00:56:34.560 who's talking about

00:56:35.240 Solyndra, here's

00:56:37.260 the difference.

00:56:39.420 If you're going to

00:56:40.160 look at the stock

00:56:40.820 market in general,

00:56:41.720 let's say as an

00:56:42.200 investor, if you're

00:56:43.440 going to pick one

00:56:44.020 stock and put your

00:56:46.060 money in it, what

00:56:47.380 is that called? 1.00

00:56:49.020 Stupid. 1.00

00:56:50.200 Stupid. 1.00

00:56:52.160 Because diversification 1.00

00:56:53.420 is sort of the only

00:56:54.360 thing that works for

00:56:55.620 investing.

00:56:56.660 So if you put all

00:56:57.620 your money in, say,

00:56:58.660 a company, like Solyndra, 0.98

00:57:01.080 that is dumb by 1.00

00:57:02.560 definition. 0.99

00:57:03.840 But if you're the

00:57:05.040 infrastructure bill,

00:57:07.380 and you freed up

00:57:08.300 billions of dollars

00:57:09.160 for the industry of

00:57:11.440 batteries, so you're

00:57:12.800 giving it to a bunch

00:57:13.760 of different companies

00:57:14.500 and you don't know

00:57:15.300 which one's going to

00:57:15.920 work, that's good

00:57:17.660 management.

00:57:19.040 That's exactly what

00:57:19.920 you should do.

00:57:20.420 That's playing by the

00:57:21.480 numbers, basically.

00:57:23.260 So, yeah, everything

00:57:24.820 you say about Solyndra,

00:57:25.920 you just forget it.

00:57:27.440 Forget it.

00:57:28.900 You know, having the

00:57:29.560 government in the

00:57:30.780 industry get too

00:57:33.120 close is a bad idea.

00:57:34.540 But funding research

00:57:36.140 into new battery types,

00:57:37.620 that's what the

00:57:38.120 government's done well

00:57:38.980 before.

00:57:40.040 Our government has

00:57:41.280 spurred industries.

00:57:42.620 We know that

00:57:43.400 works.

00:57:53.540 Be transformed by

00:57:55.260 the renewing of

00:57:55.980 your mind, huh?

00:58:00.060 Yeah, we don't, it

00:58:01.580 would be good news if

00:58:02.600 we didn't think that

00:58:03.700 money would be wasted

00:58:04.600 by political people

00:58:06.140 trying to steal it.

00:58:08.800 That's true.

00:58:10.360 What about the

00:58:11.160 WEF? 0.65

00:58:12.900 Well, what about it?

00:58:14.020 Well, Dogbert's going

00:58:14.880 after ESG, so I'm

00:58:16.700 going to go after it

00:58:17.680 on a topic level.

00:58:22.160 I do think that who

00:58:25.220 gets to make the

00:58:26.100 decisions is what all

00:58:28.680 this WEF stuff's about,

00:58:30.300 right?

00:58:31.120 And the problem is

00:58:32.240 that the WEF takes

00:58:36.520 your control away from

00:58:37.880 you and gives it to

00:58:38.840 strangers.

00:58:44.640 How long does it

00:58:45.420 take me to finish

00:58:46.260 my coffee after the

00:58:47.320 show?

00:58:47.660 I usually get, I

00:58:48.900 usually throw away

00:58:49.700 whatever's been

00:58:50.280 sitting here for too

00:58:51.100 long.

00:58:52.960 So I have coffee

00:58:54.820 most of the day

00:58:55.740 until maybe four

00:58:57.580 o'clock.

00:59:01.560 All right.

00:59:03.280 Any other, your local

00:59:05.540 paper didn't print

00:59:06.760 your ESG?

00:59:07.980 Well, I've got some

00:59:09.000 more that are not

00:59:09.580 going to get printed

00:59:10.160 too.

00:59:10.980 So I did hear that

00:59:11.760 one paper's already

00:59:12.940 canceled me.

00:59:14.380 So I want you to

00:59:15.040 know this is expensive

00:59:15.980 for me.

00:59:17.560 You know, when I said

00:59:18.380 I'd go after ESG,

00:59:20.280 I knew it wouldn't be

00:59:22.460 cheap.

00:59:23.280 I mean, it could be,

00:59:24.440 it could put me out

00:59:25.100 of business easily.

00:59:26.480 We'll see.

00:59:29.400 Yeah, somebody says

00:59:30.480 the, was it the

00:59:31.920 St. Louis Post

00:59:32.640 Dispatch canceled

00:59:34.100 me, somebody said.

00:59:36.060 But find out if it

00:59:37.460 was just for the

00:59:38.160 week of the ESG.

00:59:40.080 Because if it comes

00:59:41.400 back, they may have

00:59:42.340 just taken it out.

00:59:43.440 Did they say they

00:59:44.120 canceled it?

00:59:49.480 Did they announce

00:59:50.440 it was canceled?

00:59:52.280 They downsized.

00:59:55.340 They may have just

00:59:56.560 pulled some comics.

00:59:57.920 I don't know.

00:59:58.120 But we'll, we'll

01:00:05.140 look into that.

01:00:10.500 Keep at it.

01:00:19.080 Zero strategies.

01:00:21.740 Censoring Scott.

01:00:22.740 All right.

01:00:28.840 I think we're done

01:00:29.680 here.

01:00:31.080 Are we?

01:00:31.940 I think we are.

01:00:33.020 All right, everybody.

01:00:34.800 I have heard of

01:00:35.580 Silva Biden

01:00:36.620 Control.

01:00:38.040 We'll talk about

01:00:38.760 that later.

01:00:39.560 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 14, 2022

Episode 1866 Scott Adams： Election Gullibles vs Election Deniers, Everyone is Acting A Fool Lately

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript