Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 14, 2022


Episode 1866 Scott Adams: Election Gullibles vs Election Deniers, Everyone is Acting A Fool Lately


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour

Words per minute

144.95366

Word count

8,794

Sentence count

640

Harmful content

Misogyny

15

sentences flagged

Hate speech

12

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Dilbert continues to mock ESG, and a new comic joins him in the effort to do so. Plus, TikTok, YouTube TV, and the Wall Street Journal's new app. And, of course, there's coffee.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Do-do, do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do, la-da-da-da-da, la-pa-pa, la-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa.
00:00:14.940 Good morning, everybody.
00:00:17.320 And aren't you lucky?
00:00:20.620 Yeah.
00:00:21.440 You made it to the best thing that's ever going to happen to you.
00:00:24.320 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and every day is better than the one before, but not
00:00:28.660 as good as tomorrow.
00:00:29.960 Tomorrow's looking really good.
00:00:32.420 How would you like to take it up to levels
00:00:34.240 that humans have never experienced before?
00:00:37.480 You would.
00:00:38.440 And all you need to do that is a cup or mug or a glass,
00:00:40.760 a tank or chalice or stine, a canteen jug or flask,
00:00:43.540 a vessel of any kind.
00:00:45.680 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:48.480 I like coffee.
00:00:50.300 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,
00:00:53.080 the dopamine hit of the day.
00:00:55.860 It's the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:58.500 You can feel it starting already, can't you?
00:01:00.900 It's called The Simultaneous Sip, and it's happening now.
00:01:03.340 Go.
00:01:09.260 Savor it.
00:01:10.980 Savor it.
00:01:12.780 Okay.
00:01:17.760 Well, so Dilbert is still going after ESG.
00:01:23.920 We've got another comic today.
00:01:25.540 So here, Dogbert is talking to just some character
00:01:30.660 who's a head of some business.
00:01:35.660 And the title of the comic is Dogbert's ESG Rating Service.
00:01:40.280 So Dogbert has become an independent rating service for ESG.
00:01:45.520 Those exist, by the way.
00:01:47.240 So if you're a big company,
00:01:48.820 you can pay somebody to go look at
00:01:51.500 how much you're polluting and discriminating,
00:01:54.140 and they'll give you a score.
00:01:56.380 And I thought,
00:01:57.160 what could be a better job for Dogbert
00:01:59.260 than something that's totally subjective?
00:02:04.280 So Dogbert is talking to some CEO who is unnamed.
00:02:08.640 And Dogbert says,
00:02:09.480 your core business involves giving digital lobotomies
00:02:12.380 to other people's children.
00:02:14.840 What business is it?
00:02:16.940 So Dogbert is talking to a CEO, you assume.
00:02:19.580 Your core business involves giving digital lobotomies
00:02:23.220 to other people's children.
00:02:25.540 Right.
00:02:26.860 TikTok.
00:02:29.260 Yeah, but it's not just TikTok, right?
00:02:31.820 It's social media.
00:02:35.200 But then Dogbert says,
00:02:36.700 but you don't pollute as much as you could,
00:02:39.280 and you did ask for my pronoun.
00:02:41.500 So I'm giving you the top ESG rating.
00:02:43.600 And the CEO is looking at it,
00:02:45.740 and he goes,
00:02:45.980 this feels right.
00:02:47.460 And Dogbert's wagging,
00:02:48.680 and he says,
00:02:49.040 I think we're making a difference.
00:02:51.660 Now,
00:02:52.400 this would be the third day
00:02:56.640 of a week of ESG mocking.
00:03:00.880 And I've noticed that the ESG people,
00:03:03.680 the people who care about it,
00:03:05.700 are starting to pick it up and tweet it.
00:03:08.900 Once I get a full week,
00:03:10.380 I'm going to put them all together
00:03:13.460 and publish it as,
00:03:15.040 you know,
00:03:15.280 larger content.
00:03:17.440 And then it's going to be hard,
00:03:19.440 it's going to be hard to avoid seeing it
00:03:21.700 if you're in the ESG business.
00:03:25.280 So,
00:03:26.140 doing that for you
00:03:26.940 because you asked me to kill ESG.
00:03:29.280 And I said I'd get it done
00:03:30.520 by the end of the year.
00:03:33.400 So,
00:03:34.160 so we're going to mock it out of existence
00:03:36.740 by the end of the year.
00:03:37.840 We'll see.
00:03:38.680 I don't think it'll be out of existence.
00:03:40.380 I don't mean that.
00:03:41.780 I just mean that it's
00:03:42.900 reputation will go from
00:03:45.140 growing and good to,
00:03:47.460 uh-oh,
00:03:48.940 that's really,
00:03:50.160 that's what you can accomplish.
00:03:51.920 Uh-oh,
00:03:52.900 maybe we shouldn't do this.
00:03:55.440 So look for the,
00:03:56.660 the negative articles on ESG
00:03:59.060 to start popping up.
00:04:01.740 Sometimes you have to go first.
00:04:04.400 So,
00:04:05.020 one of the things that Dilbert does
00:04:06.320 as a comic
00:04:06.940 is it goes first.
00:04:08.420 So I can kind of soften up the room.
00:04:11.560 And then the regular journalists
00:04:13.000 can say,
00:04:13.560 oh,
00:04:13.860 okay,
00:04:14.320 other people are mocking this.
00:04:15.780 I can mock it too.
00:04:17.600 You have to sort of wait
00:04:18.800 for somebody to mock it first
00:04:20.560 before the,
00:04:21.500 the timid people come in.
00:04:26.120 Actually,
00:04:26.740 Wall Street Journal today
00:04:27.660 has a,
00:04:28.180 somebody saying,
00:04:28.860 has a piece saying
00:04:29.540 ESG is useless and costly.
00:04:31.140 But you would,
00:04:32.440 you would expect that
00:04:33.380 in an opinion piece
00:04:34.800 in the Wall Street Journal.
00:04:36.780 All right,
00:04:37.440 I,
00:04:37.680 uh,
00:04:38.020 uh,
00:04:39.460 I complained online today
00:04:40.980 because there's an app called
00:04:43.100 YouTube TV,
00:04:45.020 which is different
00:04:45.980 from regular YouTube.
00:04:47.820 So YouTube TV
00:04:49.120 is an app
00:04:50.180 made by YouTube
00:04:50.900 where you can,
00:04:52.000 it's like a cable TV thing
00:04:53.620 except you just use
00:04:54.920 your internet.
00:04:55.360 And so you can see
00:04:56.980 all the regular channels
00:04:58.000 and all the cable channels
00:04:59.160 and it's,
00:05:00.620 and the,
00:05:00.980 the interface is spectacular,
00:05:02.900 by the way.
00:05:04.000 If you,
00:05:04.640 if you're going to watch
00:05:05.440 television,
00:05:07.900 the,
00:05:08.440 uh,
00:05:08.660 YouTube TV
00:05:09.540 has the best,
00:05:10.480 um,
00:05:11.640 best interface
00:05:12.400 you've ever seen.
00:05:13.320 It's just great.
00:05:14.860 But,
00:05:15.500 there's one little oddity
00:05:16.620 I discovered
00:05:17.280 that of all the channels
00:05:19.620 that you could watch,
00:05:21.160 there's one that consistently
00:05:23.180 doesn't work.
00:05:24.300 it glitches
00:05:25.660 or the sound
00:05:26.560 doesn't match the thing
00:05:27.900 or you can't fast forward it
00:05:29.360 or it,
00:05:30.220 or it defaults back
00:05:31.760 to the beginning.
00:05:33.460 A whole bunch
00:05:34.420 of different errors.
00:05:35.480 But there's only one channel.
00:05:37.540 What,
00:05:37.700 what do you think
00:05:38.200 is the one network
00:05:39.960 or channel
00:05:40.600 on all of the channels?
00:05:42.520 What,
00:05:42.720 what do you think
00:05:43.180 is the one that doesn't work?
00:05:45.340 No,
00:05:45.540 not mine.
00:05:46.320 No,
00:05:46.720 because I,
00:05:47.200 I,
00:05:47.540 I'm not on that app.
00:05:49.320 I'm on YouTube,
00:05:51.040 but I'm not on YouTube TV.
00:05:54.300 YouTube TV
00:05:55.360 is just TV.
00:05:57.520 Right,
00:05:57.700 that's just TV.
00:05:58.920 Fox News.
00:06:01.360 Fox News.
00:06:03.200 So I asked
00:06:04.080 other people
00:06:06.120 if they have
00:06:07.400 the same problem.
00:06:09.140 I did a little,
00:06:10.100 and then somebody said,
00:06:11.240 you should do a poll
00:06:11.880 on this.
00:06:12.580 And I said,
00:06:14.020 you're right,
00:06:14.660 I really should do
00:06:15.340 a poll on this.
00:06:17.380 Because YouTube TV
00:06:18.940 did respond to me
00:06:20.120 right away,
00:06:21.020 because I said
00:06:22.020 something on Twitter,
00:06:22.660 and they noticed
00:06:23.880 right away,
00:06:24.460 and they did
00:06:25.080 a real good job
00:06:25.740 of responding.
00:06:27.140 So A plus for
00:06:28.480 responding quickly.
00:06:30.920 And A plus for
00:06:32.080 interface.
00:06:33.600 It's really
00:06:34.420 a well-made product.
00:06:36.380 It really is.
00:06:38.040 But,
00:06:38.280 so whatever's happening
00:06:39.060 with the
00:06:39.800 Fox News channel,
00:06:42.500 we don't know.
00:06:45.200 So that's the
00:06:45.840 open question.
00:06:46.640 But I asked people
00:06:47.420 if they're having
00:06:48.180 a problem,
00:06:48.600 or is it just me?
00:06:49.340 Because YouTube TV
00:06:50.880 reached out and said,
00:06:52.420 maybe you should
00:06:54.320 reload the app.
00:06:56.840 Reload the app.
00:06:58.900 But,
00:06:59.620 it's the same
00:07:01.140 on my Apple TV
00:07:02.100 and my iPad
00:07:03.480 and my old iPhone
00:07:04.920 and my new iPhone
00:07:05.920 that I got this week.
00:07:07.520 Do you think the problem
00:07:08.440 is that reloading the app
00:07:09.700 is going to help
00:07:10.220 that one channel?
00:07:12.320 It's an app that has
00:07:13.360 just one channel
00:07:14.460 with a problem.
00:07:15.120 Just one.
00:07:15.640 And rebooting the app
00:07:17.720 is going to fix
00:07:18.340 just the one channel.
00:07:21.380 Do you think
00:07:22.020 there's any chance
00:07:22.920 that that's going to work?
00:07:25.880 No.
00:07:27.720 So instead,
00:07:28.620 I did a poll
00:07:29.260 and I said,
00:07:30.860 if you use
00:07:31.540 a YouTube TV app,
00:07:33.100 not regular YouTube,
00:07:34.560 make sure you're
00:07:35.360 clear on that,
00:07:36.360 there are different apps.
00:07:37.820 Does the Fox News channel
00:07:39.000 work for you
00:07:39.820 without glitching?
00:07:41.420 Now,
00:07:41.720 if you subtract out
00:07:42.600 the people who just
00:07:43.280 wanted to see the result,
00:07:44.560 which is most of them,
00:07:45.360 because most people
00:07:46.100 don't have this app,
00:07:47.860 it was 16% said,
00:07:50.680 yes, it works, fine.
00:07:52.380 And 12% says
00:07:53.800 it glitches often
00:07:54.920 and always.
00:07:55.420 But remember,
00:07:56.420 those percentages
00:07:57.740 are after you take out
00:07:58.820 the people who just
00:07:59.440 wanted to see the answer.
00:08:01.760 So the 12 and the 16,
00:08:03.120 if you were to treat them
00:08:04.060 as the only ones
00:08:05.520 that mattered,
00:08:06.180 because they're the ones
00:08:06.840 who have the app.
00:08:07.800 Everybody else
00:08:08.400 doesn't even have the app.
00:08:10.200 So if you just look
00:08:11.140 at them,
00:08:11.920 about 12 out of 16,
00:08:14.840 would be
00:08:15.880 three quarters.
00:08:18.520 There are three quarters
00:08:19.400 as many people
00:08:20.160 who can't watch
00:08:21.340 that channel.
00:08:25.800 I mean,
00:08:26.380 that suggests
00:08:26.980 that there is,
00:08:28.540 in fact.
00:08:31.340 Yeah,
00:08:31.760 I'm doing the math wrong,
00:08:32.700 but don't worry about it.
00:08:33.880 The point is,
00:08:34.740 don't worry about the math.
00:08:36.680 The point is
00:08:37.220 that 12 and 16
00:08:38.200 aren't that far apart,
00:08:39.860 meaning that there are
00:08:40.820 a whole bunch of people
00:08:41.640 watching that channel
00:08:42.480 who can't get
00:08:43.280 that one channel
00:08:44.480 to work.
00:08:45.880 Is that a coincidence?
00:08:48.460 Now,
00:08:48.920 I saw a comment
00:08:49.880 from somebody,
00:08:50.640 apparently on Reddit,
00:08:51.600 people had been talking
00:08:52.420 about this as well,
00:08:54.460 and on Reddit,
00:08:55.240 somebody said
00:08:55.900 that somebody
00:08:57.760 at YouTube TV,
00:08:58.940 now this is all
00:08:59.580 low credibility,
00:09:00.960 I don't know
00:09:01.220 if this is true,
00:09:02.500 somebody at YouTube TV
00:09:03.820 suggested it might be
00:09:04.940 the feed
00:09:05.560 coming from Fox News,
00:09:07.840 meaning that
00:09:08.560 they treat everything
00:09:09.440 the same,
00:09:10.020 but if they get
00:09:10.500 a bad feed,
00:09:11.920 what are you going
00:09:12.420 to do?
00:09:13.880 Do you believe that?
00:09:15.320 Do you believe that
00:09:16.140 Fox TV,
00:09:17.460 or Fox News,
00:09:19.260 who appear to be
00:09:20.500 among the most
00:09:21.480 technically capable
00:09:22.640 people around,
00:09:26.380 and yet,
00:09:27.000 and yet they're
00:09:27.860 the only channel,
00:09:29.620 all the other channels
00:09:30.660 can send a clean signal,
00:09:32.840 but it's just the only
00:09:33.600 one that can't.
00:09:35.320 Do you believe that?
00:09:36.380 Do you believe that?
00:09:39.440 Now, other people
00:09:40.840 said that there
00:09:41.480 are other apps,
00:09:42.860 like the Roku app,
00:09:44.400 where they have
00:09:44.900 the same problem,
00:09:46.760 where it seems
00:09:47.320 that Fox News
00:09:48.100 is a problem.
00:09:49.080 Now, if that's true,
00:09:51.340 that would actually
00:09:52.200 at least be suggestive
00:09:54.180 that the feed
00:09:54.860 has a problem,
00:09:56.240 but I don't think
00:09:57.260 you're seeing
00:09:57.620 the same problems
00:09:58.740 in each app.
00:10:01.060 I'll bet you
00:10:01.800 if you looked
00:10:02.280 at the Roku app
00:10:03.300 and the YouTube TV app
00:10:07.060 at the same time,
00:10:07.900 even if they both
00:10:09.800 glitch,
00:10:10.960 bet it's not
00:10:11.520 at the same time.
00:10:13.160 I'll bet it's not.
00:10:14.160 I'd put a big bet
00:10:14.980 on that.
00:10:16.080 Because if they glitch
00:10:17.020 at the same time,
00:10:18.060 then it's the feed.
00:10:19.880 You know,
00:10:20.120 you've eliminated
00:10:20.740 the other options.
00:10:22.220 I don't think so.
00:10:23.300 I think it's going
00:10:23.780 to be different mistakes
00:10:24.840 that are unique
00:10:26.580 to Fox News.
00:10:28.220 That's what I think.
00:10:28.920 Now,
00:10:31.140 where do we have the,
00:10:32.580 when do we use the,
00:10:33.880 let's say,
00:10:35.260 assumption of innocence
00:10:36.300 versus the assumption
00:10:38.420 of guilt?
00:10:39.300 Now, in the legal system,
00:10:40.820 because it's humans
00:10:42.120 and we want to do
00:10:43.360 the best we can
00:10:44.060 for them,
00:10:45.000 assumption of innocence
00:10:46.020 is the standard
00:10:47.160 and we all agree
00:10:48.340 with that.
00:10:49.600 But in this specific case,
00:10:51.900 so this is not really
00:10:52.780 about any individual,
00:10:54.660 it's about whether
00:10:55.460 a system is working
00:10:57.780 the way it should
00:10:58.480 in this American experience.
00:11:01.900 Should you assume
00:11:02.940 that if you see
00:11:03.720 something like I'm seeing,
00:11:05.900 is my assumption,
00:11:07.000 should my starting
00:11:07.680 assumption be innocence?
00:11:09.300 That it's just a bug?
00:11:10.820 What do you think?
00:11:11.980 Is it reasonable
00:11:12.960 to assume
00:11:13.720 that this is just
00:11:15.640 a coincidence?
00:11:17.740 Is it reasonable?
00:11:19.320 I don't think it's reasonable
00:11:20.620 to assume that anymore.
00:11:22.000 It's entirely possible
00:11:23.280 it's a coincidence.
00:11:25.460 Let me be as clear
00:11:27.560 as I can.
00:11:28.740 If I had to put
00:11:29.540 a bet down,
00:11:30.540 I don't even know
00:11:31.360 which way I'd bet.
00:11:32.940 I mean, it looks like
00:11:33.720 a coin flip to me.
00:11:35.040 It's definitely possible
00:11:36.200 that it's just a bug.
00:11:37.940 It's definitely possible.
00:11:41.000 I just don't think
00:11:42.180 that should be
00:11:42.660 your starting assumption.
00:11:44.680 Now, I was going to
00:11:45.840 not talk about it
00:11:46.700 in public
00:11:47.100 because I thought,
00:11:48.080 you know,
00:11:48.980 the odds are so big
00:11:50.400 that this is just a bug
00:11:51.880 that it would be
00:11:53.900 embarrassing
00:11:54.360 if they say,
00:11:55.240 yeah, the feed was bad
00:11:56.540 and then they prove it.
00:11:57.840 I'm like,
00:11:58.280 oh, okay,
00:11:59.200 I made a big deal
00:11:59.860 about this
00:12:00.380 and it was just a bug.
00:12:03.640 But I think
00:12:04.400 we're at a point
00:12:05.160 in history
00:12:05.800 where the institution
00:12:07.680 has to be assumed
00:12:08.640 guilty
00:12:09.100 until they can
00:12:10.960 demonstrate they're not.
00:12:12.840 What do you think?
00:12:14.220 Is it inappropriate
00:12:15.540 to say that
00:12:16.340 the institution,
00:12:17.440 whether it's
00:12:18.000 Google or YouTube
00:12:19.540 or the FBI
00:12:20.500 or the government
00:12:21.360 or Congress,
00:12:22.020 it doesn't matter
00:12:22.560 who it is,
00:12:23.220 the media,
00:12:23.980 Fox News,
00:12:24.900 any entity,
00:12:26.080 just any public
00:12:27.780 facing entity,
00:12:29.900 I don't think
00:12:31.220 you can assume
00:12:31.860 that they're innocent.
00:12:33.940 I think you have
00:12:34.800 to assume
00:12:35.180 they're guilty
00:12:35.680 if you see
00:12:36.580 anecdotal evidence
00:12:38.180 suggesting it.
00:12:40.760 That's what I think.
00:12:44.620 Plug my prints.
00:12:46.840 Okay, I will.
00:12:47.960 Did you know
00:12:48.420 you could go
00:12:48.840 to Dilbert.com
00:12:49.920 and get a legal
00:12:51.420 authorized copy
00:12:53.680 of any of my strips
00:12:54.760 if you want to use it
00:12:55.880 in business
00:12:56.420 or something else.
00:12:57.640 If you want to write
00:12:58.420 an article about it.
00:12:59.260 So the ESG strips
00:13:00.480 are perfect for that.
00:13:03.100 A lot of people
00:13:03.620 are probably writing
00:13:04.320 about that topic.
00:13:06.000 So whether you're
00:13:06.620 writing pro
00:13:07.260 or negative
00:13:07.940 on that topic,
00:13:08.760 you might want
00:13:09.360 to license those strips.
00:13:10.600 tips for an ESG
00:13:15.900 free state.
00:13:17.140 You mean
00:13:17.620 what should we do
00:13:18.780 to get rid of ESG?
00:13:20.860 Well, what we should do
00:13:22.160 is what we're doing.
00:13:24.140 We need to mock
00:13:25.220 it out of existence.
00:13:26.640 There's no other way,
00:13:27.620 really.
00:13:28.440 It has to be mocked.
00:13:29.460 All right.
00:13:31.680 So Mike Lindell,
00:13:32.880 the MyPillow guy,
00:13:35.180 who's now more of
00:13:36.240 a MySlippers guy
00:13:37.180 it seems like,
00:13:37.800 but he was going
00:13:40.140 through a drive-thru
00:13:41.000 and the FBI
00:13:42.240 surrounded him.
00:13:43.900 They pulled their cars up
00:13:45.220 and blocked his car.
00:13:46.720 Imagine this happening
00:13:47.640 to you.
00:13:49.060 This happened in America
00:13:50.500 that they wanted
00:13:52.680 to serve him
00:13:53.260 with a subpoena,
00:13:54.440 I guess,
00:13:54.800 or a warrant
00:13:55.440 and get his phone
00:13:56.240 and they waited
00:13:57.980 until he was in his car
00:13:59.320 and they somehow
00:14:01.240 followed him
00:14:01.960 to a fast food place
00:14:03.460 and while he's in line
00:14:04.400 they surround him
00:14:05.720 with their FBI cars
00:14:07.080 now he did say
00:14:09.420 that they were just
00:14:10.060 polite and professional
00:14:11.520 and they didn't have
00:14:12.420 any kind of attitude
00:14:13.200 or anything.
00:14:14.700 So I'm going to give a
00:14:15.700 I'll give a compliment
00:14:16.780 to the FBI agents
00:14:18.240 because Mike Lindell did.
00:14:21.420 So Mike Lindell said
00:14:22.800 they did a good job
00:14:24.460 and I'm going to pass it along.
00:14:25.700 So that's for the agents
00:14:27.100 themselves.
00:14:28.600 But was it ever okay
00:14:30.320 for them to even do that
00:14:31.460 in the first place?
00:14:33.280 I mean,
00:14:33.540 I'm sure they did it
00:14:34.340 on orders or something
00:14:35.460 but that feels like
00:14:38.040 a public humiliation
00:14:39.060 with no purpose.
00:14:40.720 It also feels like
00:14:41.940 intimidation.
00:14:43.860 You don't think
00:14:44.640 they could have called him?
00:14:47.960 You don't think
00:14:48.660 they could have called him
00:14:49.320 and said,
00:14:49.800 hey,
00:14:50.200 somebody's going to come down
00:14:51.900 at 10 a.m.
00:14:53.380 and we've got a warrant
00:14:54.960 we're going to ask
00:14:55.540 for your phone.
00:14:57.040 Could you answer the door,
00:14:58.820 make sure somebody
00:14:59.440 answers the door
00:15:00.060 and bring your phone
00:15:00.800 with you?
00:15:02.360 What was he going to do?
00:15:03.520 Leave the country?
00:15:04.080 Did they think
00:15:05.780 that Mike Lindell
00:15:06.480 was a flight risk?
00:15:08.580 What,
00:15:08.880 did they think
00:15:09.300 that he was going
00:15:09.700 to hide his phone?
00:15:11.440 And let me ask you this,
00:15:13.260 why do you need
00:15:14.380 access to the phone?
00:15:16.240 How much is on the phone
00:15:17.740 that's not on the iCloud?
00:15:21.520 I'm wondering
00:15:22.160 if you even need
00:15:22.960 phones anymore.
00:15:24.120 Don't you just need,
00:15:25.800 but wiping it
00:15:26.940 doesn't help anymore,
00:15:27.840 does it?
00:15:29.360 Does wiping help?
00:15:30.460 If you wiped
00:15:32.700 your phone clean,
00:15:33.800 it'd still be
00:15:34.300 on the cloud,
00:15:34.900 right?
00:15:35.300 Or there'd be
00:15:35.800 a backup in the cloud,
00:15:37.140 or,
00:15:38.120 I don't think
00:15:38.640 you can wipe
00:15:39.140 a phone anymore,
00:15:39.900 can you?
00:15:40.960 I don't,
00:15:42.660 if it's Apple?
00:15:47.020 Yeah.
00:15:49.240 You can delete it all.
00:15:51.100 You can delete
00:15:51.980 the phone,
00:15:53.020 but I don't believe
00:15:53.980 you can delete
00:15:54.700 your iCloud records,
00:15:56.200 because there would
00:15:56.860 always be a backup.
00:15:58.460 Wouldn't there?
00:15:58.880 You tell me
00:16:00.580 there's no backup
00:16:01.580 of your iCloud
00:16:03.980 after you think
00:16:04.860 you've deleted it?
00:16:06.140 I don't believe that.
00:16:07.660 I don't believe
00:16:08.420 that at all.
00:16:10.040 Anyway,
00:16:10.680 so I don't,
00:16:11.180 there's some
00:16:11.500 technical questions
00:16:12.420 I wonder about,
00:16:13.620 might not be important,
00:16:15.120 but doesn't it look
00:16:16.720 like this is political?
00:16:19.360 Does this look
00:16:20.220 legal to you
00:16:20.900 or political?
00:16:23.280 Again,
00:16:24.100 do we give
00:16:25.480 the FBI
00:16:26.060 the benefit
00:16:26.700 of a doubt
00:16:27.320 the assumption
00:16:29.560 of innocence?
00:16:31.160 Has the FBI
00:16:32.040 earned
00:16:32.600 the assumption
00:16:33.340 of innocence?
00:16:34.820 Nope.
00:16:36.240 They have earned,
00:16:37.200 they have earned,
00:16:38.560 this is an important
00:16:40.340 question,
00:16:41.160 they've earned
00:16:41.960 a presumption
00:16:42.720 of guilt.
00:16:44.040 They've earned it.
00:16:45.360 I didn't do it.
00:16:46.840 If you're looking
00:16:47.500 at me,
00:16:47.920 don't blame me.
00:16:49.740 Look at the comments.
00:16:50.780 Everybody's on
00:16:51.280 the same page.
00:16:51.940 I didn't do it.
00:16:53.460 It wasn't my fault.
00:16:55.240 The FBI
00:16:55.940 got that themselves.
00:16:57.400 They went out
00:16:58.220 and got themselves
00:16:59.740 an assumption
00:17:00.320 of guilt.
00:17:02.140 So,
00:17:02.900 I'll apply that.
00:17:06.360 And it does
00:17:07.440 look like my,
00:17:09.020 when was the last
00:17:09.640 time somebody
00:17:10.220 mocked me
00:17:10.940 for suggesting
00:17:12.100 that Republicans
00:17:12.860 would be hunted?
00:17:13.680 Do you remember
00:17:15.580 how much mocking
00:17:16.540 I got the first
00:17:17.540 several months
00:17:18.240 of the Biden
00:17:18.860 administration?
00:17:20.280 When they couldn't
00:17:21.280 find all the hunting
00:17:22.420 I had predicted?
00:17:25.100 Nobody's mocking
00:17:25.860 me now,
00:17:26.300 are they?
00:17:27.960 Have you seen
00:17:28.660 even that one troll
00:17:29.680 come after me
00:17:30.540 and say,
00:17:31.220 lately,
00:17:32.140 lately,
00:17:32.860 last two weeks,
00:17:34.380 hey,
00:17:34.760 where's all that
00:17:35.380 haunting you
00:17:36.120 predicted,
00:17:36.960 Scott?
00:17:37.880 Where are all
00:17:38.380 these Republicans
00:17:39.380 being haunted?
00:17:40.700 I don't see
00:17:41.340 any of that.
00:17:43.360 They all shut
00:17:44.220 the fuck up, 0.91
00:17:44.980 didn't they?
00:17:45.340 Yeah,
00:17:47.260 yeah,
00:17:47.540 I guess I
00:17:48.100 served them
00:17:49.680 a nice dose
00:17:50.340 of shut the
00:17:50.960 fuck up,
00:17:51.580 didn't I?
00:17:52.660 I mean,
00:17:53.240 I didn't do it
00:17:53.720 intentionally,
00:17:54.300 I was just
00:17:54.660 sitting here.
00:17:55.860 But the news
00:17:56.980 delivered them
00:17:58.820 a nice,
00:17:59.620 heaping,
00:18:00.360 steaming pile
00:18:01.240 of shut the
00:18:01.960 fuck up
00:18:02.680 because the
00:18:03.920 hunting is
00:18:04.420 happening.
00:18:06.480 Now,
00:18:07.800 I've made
00:18:09.680 some pretty
00:18:10.240 unusual predictions
00:18:11.600 that have
00:18:12.340 come true.
00:18:15.200 This one
00:18:15.840 might be more
00:18:16.420 unusual than
00:18:17.220 even some
00:18:17.760 of the other
00:18:18.120 ones.
00:18:19.380 I mean,
00:18:19.560 who has ever
00:18:21.200 made that
00:18:21.660 kind of
00:18:22.000 prediction?
00:18:24.440 Right?
00:18:25.740 Has anybody
00:18:26.560 ever made
00:18:27.300 a prediction
00:18:27.760 that the
00:18:28.400 other team
00:18:28.920 would be
00:18:29.300 haunted
00:18:29.620 after an
00:18:30.240 election
00:18:30.540 in the
00:18:32.140 history of
00:18:32.580 the United
00:18:32.920 States?
00:18:33.260 Probably
00:18:33.500 never.
00:18:35.120 And yet
00:18:35.540 I made
00:18:35.920 that prediction
00:18:36.500 and people
00:18:37.560 laughed,
00:18:39.800 mocked me
00:18:40.500 mercilessly,
00:18:41.940 and then
00:18:42.940 they got a
00:18:43.440 big old
00:18:44.540 dose of
00:18:45.360 shut the
00:18:45.940 fuck up.
00:18:47.340 Reality
00:18:47.820 is awesome
00:18:48.380 sometimes.
00:18:49.560 I saw
00:18:50.800 I think
00:18:52.940 it was
00:18:53.160 on
00:18:53.720 Instagram,
00:18:54.400 a little
00:18:54.580 reel,
00:18:55.940 a little
00:18:56.460 bit by
00:18:56.840 Joe Rogan.
00:18:59.540 And he
00:19:00.140 was saying
00:19:00.500 that success
00:19:01.060 is meaningless
00:19:01.840 if no one
00:19:02.680 loves you.
00:19:05.080 There's no
00:19:05.800 point to it.
00:19:07.080 You know,
00:19:07.280 you could go
00:19:07.720 out and
00:19:08.120 succeed and
00:19:08.840 really make
00:19:09.500 something of
00:19:09.980 yourself,
00:19:10.520 but if
00:19:11.260 nobody cares,
00:19:13.120 and I'm not
00:19:13.800 talking about
00:19:14.240 strangers,
00:19:14.780 I'm talking
00:19:16.900 about like
00:19:17.380 in your
00:19:17.620 actual
00:19:17.880 personal
00:19:18.460 situation,
00:19:19.720 if nobody
00:19:20.200 loves you,
00:19:21.720 like for
00:19:22.180 who you
00:19:22.620 are and
00:19:23.100 really cares
00:19:23.620 about what
00:19:24.060 you did,
00:19:25.440 none of it
00:19:26.060 matters.
00:19:27.780 I mean,
00:19:28.340 it matters to
00:19:28.940 the world.
00:19:31.400 And I have to
00:19:32.960 say this hit me
00:19:33.940 a little bit
00:19:34.360 hard,
00:19:35.060 because while I
00:19:36.020 do feel,
00:19:36.580 you know,
00:19:36.920 lots of love
00:19:37.660 from the
00:19:38.640 audience,
00:19:39.800 lots of love
00:19:40.400 from, you know,
00:19:41.240 just people who are
00:19:41.900 Dilbert fans
00:19:42.580 and stuff,
00:19:43.460 and I do
00:19:43.860 feel lots of
00:19:44.420 love from,
00:19:45.340 you know,
00:19:45.640 community and
00:19:46.760 friends and
00:19:48.080 stuff,
00:19:48.660 but I'm not
00:19:49.220 in a relationship
00:19:51.480 right now.
00:19:53.320 And I have to
00:19:54.320 tell you,
00:19:54.640 this hit me,
00:19:56.140 because there
00:19:57.300 are parts of
00:19:57.800 your life which
00:19:59.280 you experience
00:20:00.040 alone,
00:20:01.160 and then they
00:20:01.660 disappear.
00:20:03.620 It's weird to
00:20:05.000 not be able to
00:20:05.880 experience life
00:20:07.180 as a shared
00:20:09.200 experience,
00:20:10.440 which is,
00:20:10.960 that's sort of
00:20:11.600 the weird
00:20:12.260 situation I'm
00:20:13.080 having.
00:20:13.620 Now,
00:20:13.920 I do share
00:20:14.340 it with you,
00:20:15.760 but I think
00:20:16.260 you would
00:20:16.680 acknowledge it's
00:20:17.800 different from
00:20:18.460 being in some
00:20:19.620 kind of relationship.
00:20:21.280 So it's a
00:20:22.120 very weird
00:20:24.080 and unsettling
00:20:25.080 experience I'm
00:20:26.060 having,
00:20:26.940 which is,
00:20:28.320 100% of my
00:20:29.560 efforts are
00:20:31.780 to benefit
00:20:32.500 you.
00:20:34.460 They don't
00:20:34.900 really benefit
00:20:35.500 me.
00:20:36.900 And,
00:20:37.220 well,
00:20:37.360 except,
00:20:37.760 you know,
00:20:38.000 whatever reflected,
00:20:39.780 you know,
00:20:40.540 credit,
00:20:40.920 I guess.
00:20:42.040 But I have
00:20:42.620 to say that
00:20:43.060 I don't
00:20:43.360 feel it
00:20:44.080 like,
00:20:46.340 I don't
00:20:48.180 feel it like
00:20:48.800 you would if
00:20:49.280 you were sharing
00:20:49.840 it with somebody
00:20:50.380 specific.
00:20:51.640 You know what
00:20:51.900 I mean?
00:20:52.720 It's,
00:20:53.960 and I'm
00:20:54.780 going to give
00:20:55.080 you a little
00:20:55.500 micro lesson
00:20:56.680 here.
00:20:56.980 I wasn't
00:20:57.200 planning on it,
00:20:57.780 but I'll
00:21:00.920 never get
00:21:01.280 another beauty
00:21:02.220 like Christina.
00:21:03.540 Somebody says
00:21:04.240 it was a big
00:21:04.740 blunder to let
00:21:05.460 her go. 0.54
00:21:06.660 Well,
00:21:06.920 you know,
00:21:07.200 beauty isn't 0.98
00:21:08.320 the only
00:21:08.760 criteria,
00:21:11.340 is but
00:21:12.480 one.
00:21:15.940 Anyway,
00:21:18.220 the micro lesson
00:21:19.460 was on
00:21:20.160 treating life
00:21:21.080 like a
00:21:21.900 video game
00:21:22.900 and
00:21:24.420 gamifying
00:21:26.100 your actual
00:21:28.300 life.
00:21:28.840 And I've
00:21:29.060 been doing
00:21:29.320 more of that
00:21:29.840 lately.
00:21:31.060 For example,
00:21:33.000 if I am
00:21:33.880 folding my
00:21:34.960 laundry,
00:21:36.720 I could
00:21:37.420 frame it
00:21:37.900 in my
00:21:38.100 head as,
00:21:38.600 oh,
00:21:38.980 God,
00:21:39.540 folding
00:21:39.980 laundry,
00:21:40.740 oh,
00:21:41.560 boring,
00:21:42.320 I want to
00:21:42.620 do something
00:21:42.960 interesting.
00:21:44.040 But instead,
00:21:44.900 I treat it
00:21:45.300 like a game.
00:21:46.980 So I try
00:21:47.740 to do it
00:21:48.200 in the most
00:21:48.880 efficient way.
00:21:50.420 And I say,
00:21:50.940 okay,
00:21:51.160 the game
00:21:51.720 is to see
00:21:52.880 how quickly
00:21:53.420 and efficiently
00:21:54.000 I can do
00:21:54.620 this.
00:21:54.980 And then I
00:21:55.340 sort of
00:21:55.600 enjoy it.
00:21:56.660 Because,
00:21:57.120 you know,
00:21:57.380 I've got a
00:21:57.960 towel folding
00:21:58.580 technique that
00:21:59.420 just feels
00:21:59.920 fun to do.
00:22:01.380 And it
00:22:01.640 becomes like
00:22:02.560 a skill
00:22:03.300 game.
00:22:04.500 And then I
00:22:04.860 get through
00:22:05.180 it,
00:22:05.340 and I
00:22:05.460 like it.
00:22:06.300 And I
00:22:06.840 manage to
00:22:07.320 do that
00:22:07.660 with a
00:22:07.900 whole bunch
00:22:08.220 of other
00:22:08.560 things.
00:22:09.360 You know,
00:22:09.520 little boring
00:22:10.180 things,
00:22:10.900 et cetera.
00:22:12.380 Or even
00:22:12.920 getting in
00:22:13.340 trouble,
00:22:13.840 or even
00:22:14.160 business
00:22:14.500 things.
00:22:15.880 You know,
00:22:16.240 to me,
00:22:16.760 I treat
00:22:17.260 them more
00:22:17.660 like there's
00:22:19.080 a game
00:22:19.460 with rules,
00:22:21.100 and here's
00:22:21.640 my little
00:22:22.080 challenge,
00:22:23.240 and I've
00:22:23.460 got to get
00:22:24.420 past that
00:22:24.840 challenge.
00:22:26.260 But I'm
00:22:27.220 writing this
00:22:27.740 in my
00:22:28.300 upcoming book,
00:22:29.040 so you
00:22:29.440 might see
00:22:29.740 this again.
00:22:30.840 But,
00:22:31.100 one of
00:22:33.200 the things
00:22:33.520 that video
00:22:34.020 games do
00:22:34.640 is they
00:22:35.040 don't give
00:22:35.560 you,
00:22:36.180 typically,
00:22:37.260 they don't
00:22:37.700 give you
00:22:38.060 all the
00:22:38.360 resources you
00:22:39.140 need to
00:22:39.520 win the
00:22:39.840 game at
00:22:40.760 the start
00:22:41.200 of the
00:22:41.400 game.
00:22:42.400 You have
00:22:42.960 to go
00:22:43.200 get them.
00:22:44.300 So you
00:22:45.020 don't have
00:22:45.380 all the
00:22:45.660 energy you
00:22:46.220 need,
00:22:46.540 or life,
00:22:47.080 or weapons,
00:22:47.680 you have
00:22:47.920 to find
00:22:48.320 them along
00:22:48.800 the way.
00:22:49.680 But you
00:22:50.200 don't know
00:22:50.540 where they
00:22:50.860 will be.
00:22:51.640 You just
00:22:52.180 have to
00:22:52.580 trust that
00:22:54.820 if you
00:22:55.120 play well,
00:22:55.700 you're going
00:22:55.960 to find
00:22:56.300 stuff.
00:22:57.560 And the
00:22:57.860 longer you
00:22:58.600 play,
00:22:58.940 the better
00:22:59.220 you'll be
00:22:59.520 at finding
00:23:00.240 stuff,
00:23:00.680 I guess.
00:23:02.080 And I
00:23:03.620 treat the
00:23:04.080 actual world
00:23:04.840 like that.
00:23:07.080 And it
00:23:07.740 works really
00:23:08.260 well.
00:23:09.100 Because the
00:23:09.540 actual world
00:23:10.360 does serve
00:23:11.560 up resources
00:23:12.480 in surprising
00:23:14.260 ways,
00:23:14.860 just like
00:23:15.200 video games.
00:23:16.700 So if I
00:23:17.560 say to
00:23:17.860 myself,
00:23:18.540 I want
00:23:19.060 to accomplish
00:23:19.580 X, but I
00:23:20.320 don't know
00:23:20.620 how to get
00:23:20.980 there, and
00:23:21.920 I don't have
00:23:22.400 the resources
00:23:22.960 to do it,
00:23:24.300 I never
00:23:24.760 say don't
00:23:25.300 start.
00:23:26.840 Because if
00:23:27.540 you did
00:23:27.820 that with
00:23:28.080 a video
00:23:28.420 game, you
00:23:29.520 wouldn't
00:23:29.760 play.
00:23:30.060 So instead
00:23:32.040 I say,
00:23:32.640 what's the
00:23:32.980 only thing
00:23:33.760 I can
00:23:34.140 do?
00:23:34.880 Now maybe
00:23:35.220 the only
00:23:35.560 thing I
00:23:35.920 can do
00:23:36.420 is do
00:23:37.460 a Google
00:23:37.860 search.
00:23:39.900 Or ask
00:23:40.640 somebody a
00:23:41.060 question.
00:23:41.980 It's all I
00:23:42.420 can do.
00:23:42.780 I don't have
00:23:43.080 any resources
00:23:43.760 or even know
00:23:44.680 what to do
00:23:45.100 next.
00:23:45.840 But I do
00:23:46.700 that first
00:23:47.180 step, and
00:23:48.200 then I see
00:23:48.660 if I get
00:23:49.180 a resource.
00:23:50.020 For
00:23:51.560 example, the
00:23:53.580 process of
00:23:54.320 writing the
00:23:54.800 book I'm
00:23:55.140 writing.
00:23:56.560 Here was
00:23:57.100 the process.
00:23:58.120 I didn't
00:23:58.580 have the
00:23:58.940 energy, and
00:23:59.640 I didn't
00:23:59.880 have the
00:24:00.220 resources to
00:24:00.980 do it.
00:24:01.920 And I
00:24:02.400 didn't even
00:24:02.720 have a
00:24:03.000 great idea
00:24:03.540 for a
00:24:04.800 book.
00:24:05.700 Now one
00:24:06.100 day I got
00:24:06.480 this idea
00:24:06.960 of doing
00:24:07.320 something about
00:24:07.800 reframing,
00:24:09.120 and I just
00:24:09.860 wrote it on
00:24:10.500 my whiteboard,
00:24:11.800 you know,
00:24:12.120 reframing book.
00:24:13.480 No title for
00:24:14.280 the book or
00:24:14.660 anything, just
00:24:15.120 sort of an
00:24:15.520 idea.
00:24:16.520 Once I
00:24:17.060 wrote it
00:24:17.380 down and
00:24:18.760 looked at it
00:24:19.340 every time I
00:24:19.880 saw it, I
00:24:21.080 started thinking,
00:24:21.740 you know, I
00:24:23.120 should at
00:24:23.500 least, at
00:24:24.420 the very
00:24:24.760 least, I
00:24:26.520 should see if
00:24:27.060 there would
00:24:27.340 be some
00:24:28.200 chapter titles
00:24:29.480 that would
00:24:29.840 fit into
00:24:30.300 that.
00:24:31.240 And then I
00:24:31.600 just start, I
00:24:32.360 open up a
00:24:32.860 document, and
00:24:34.280 I put a
00:24:35.400 reframing book,
00:24:36.320 you know,
00:24:36.520 working title.
00:24:38.120 And then I
00:24:38.640 just say,
00:24:38.980 what would be
00:24:39.400 in that?
00:24:40.380 And I think
00:24:40.860 of some
00:24:41.140 examples.
00:24:42.160 And they're
00:24:42.460 just bullet
00:24:42.880 points.
00:24:43.940 And they're
00:24:44.400 just bullet
00:24:44.780 points that
00:24:45.300 would become
00:24:45.700 maybe chapter
00:24:46.700 headings at
00:24:47.460 some point.
00:24:48.760 And then I
00:24:49.380 look at it
00:24:49.800 and say,
00:24:50.120 huh, this
00:24:51.460 looks like it
00:24:52.000 could be a
00:24:52.400 book.
00:24:53.440 And then I
00:24:54.100 get a
00:24:55.040 resource.
00:24:56.520 I get an
00:24:57.100 energy from
00:24:58.780 having done
00:24:59.380 something that
00:24:59.900 looks like,
00:25:00.400 huh, this
00:25:01.300 could be
00:25:01.600 something.
00:25:02.100 Then I
00:25:02.380 imagine it.
00:25:03.840 Then I
00:25:04.720 shared it
00:25:05.980 with you.
00:25:07.600 I shared
00:25:08.000 it on
00:25:08.300 livestream that
00:25:08.940 I was
00:25:09.160 thinking about
00:25:09.660 it.
00:25:10.140 Then people
00:25:10.600 said, yes,
00:25:11.280 yes, write
00:25:11.720 that book.
00:25:12.820 We'd love to
00:25:13.340 have that
00:25:13.640 book.
00:25:14.700 And then I
00:25:15.160 got a
00:25:15.400 resource.
00:25:16.500 I got
00:25:16.880 energy.
00:25:17.840 So I
00:25:18.320 didn't have
00:25:18.720 the energy
00:25:19.140 to do it.
00:25:20.520 I simply
00:25:21.320 trusted, like a
00:25:22.380 video game, that
00:25:23.720 if I started
00:25:24.300 walking forward, I
00:25:25.320 could figure it
00:25:25.880 out.
00:25:27.280 And I
00:25:28.500 figured out I
00:25:29.140 needed energy.
00:25:30.640 And so I
00:25:31.080 went to you and
00:25:32.220 said, hey, I got
00:25:32.780 this idea, and then
00:25:33.540 you gave me
00:25:34.000 energy.
00:25:35.320 And I
00:25:35.760 thought, oh, shit,
00:25:36.500 people really want
00:25:37.280 to see this book.
00:25:38.820 Now that's
00:25:39.500 different.
00:25:40.360 Because if it's the
00:25:41.300 publisher who wants
00:25:42.180 to see it, that's
00:25:42.940 interesting.
00:25:43.320 But that's
00:25:45.300 different than if
00:25:46.280 the public wants
00:25:46.980 to see it, right?
00:25:48.160 And it's
00:25:48.500 different than if I
00:25:49.200 just want to make
00:25:50.400 a book.
00:25:51.560 So now I've got
00:25:52.500 energy.
00:25:52.880 Then I go to my
00:25:53.700 agent, book
00:25:56.080 agent.
00:25:56.720 I say, I got
00:25:57.140 this idea.
00:25:58.520 And he looks at
00:25:59.120 the idea, and he
00:26:00.040 says, I love this
00:26:01.460 idea.
00:26:02.180 We definitely sell
00:26:02.960 this idea.
00:26:04.460 Let's talk to your
00:26:05.560 favorite publisher.
00:26:07.000 And I talk to my
00:26:07.860 favorite publisher, and
00:26:08.720 they say, we love
00:26:09.380 this idea.
00:26:09.880 Now I've got all
00:26:11.640 the energy I
00:26:12.220 need.
00:26:13.120 I've got audience, I've
00:26:14.380 got a publisher, I've
00:26:15.380 got my agent, and
00:26:16.320 they're the ones that
00:26:16.840 know the most, right?
00:26:18.520 It'd be one thing if a
00:26:19.440 stranger said, oh, do
00:26:20.480 that.
00:26:21.040 But when the experts,
00:26:22.780 the people who know
00:26:23.640 what needs to be in a
00:26:25.340 book to sell, when
00:26:27.520 they tell you that
00:26:28.160 something, well, that's
00:26:29.560 energizing.
00:26:31.220 All right?
00:26:31.960 So then I start
00:26:33.460 writing.
00:26:34.400 And of course, it's
00:26:35.040 hard, and it's
00:26:35.700 boring, and I fall
00:26:37.140 asleep and stuff.
00:26:37.940 So, you know, you
00:26:39.260 know my story of
00:26:39.980 trying to work
00:26:40.480 through how I can
00:26:41.140 stay awake and have
00:26:41.940 time to do it and
00:26:42.600 stuff.
00:26:43.460 It was a separate
00:26:44.060 process.
00:26:45.320 But now I've gotten
00:26:46.540 to the point where I've
00:26:47.200 got 36,000 words.
00:26:50.620 And all the chapters
00:26:52.340 are stubbed out.
00:26:53.440 So every chapter has
00:26:54.660 at least a paragraph
00:26:55.520 that I'll maybe plump
00:26:57.880 out a little bit.
00:26:59.320 But once you see a
00:27:00.600 book with probably 90
00:27:05.140 reframes in it, and
00:27:07.920 35,000 words, you
00:27:11.640 know you have to
00:27:12.360 finish it.
00:27:13.700 You have to finish
00:27:14.360 it.
00:27:15.120 Right?
00:27:15.320 Because you're not
00:27:15.700 going to leave half a
00:27:16.560 book if you have my
00:27:18.520 personality.
00:27:19.360 Some people could, but
00:27:20.480 I don't have the
00:27:21.800 personality where I
00:27:23.480 can leave something
00:27:24.200 that pregnant and
00:27:25.680 then walk away from
00:27:26.480 it.
00:27:27.440 Don't make any
00:27:28.240 jokes.
00:27:28.820 I know you're
00:27:29.220 going to.
00:27:30.320 But so that's the
00:27:31.940 process.
00:27:32.280 The process is you
00:27:33.600 don't understand that
00:27:35.500 there's energy.
00:27:36.600 You understand that
00:27:37.700 you're in a game in
00:27:40.020 which the energy will
00:27:41.280 be there if you look
00:27:42.280 for it.
00:27:43.420 But you've got to go
00:27:44.100 get it.
00:27:45.360 Right?
00:27:45.920 Now you will be
00:27:46.940 amazed how many times
00:27:48.240 gamifying a real
00:27:50.060 world thing makes
00:27:51.400 sense.
00:27:52.440 Somebody just
00:27:52.960 mentioned starting,
00:27:55.260 let's say, looking
00:27:56.340 for a job.
00:27:58.820 How awful is the
00:28:00.320 process of looking
00:28:01.500 for a job and
00:28:02.560 going on interviews?
00:28:04.920 Really awful.
00:28:06.560 Right?
00:28:06.900 You don't like it.
00:28:08.120 But what if he
00:28:08.580 gamified it?
00:28:10.260 I have a friend who
00:28:11.180 used to do that.
00:28:12.000 He'd go on interviews
00:28:12.920 not because he wanted
00:28:14.640 the job.
00:28:15.520 Sometimes they were
00:28:16.220 worse jobs than the
00:28:17.160 one he had.
00:28:18.200 But he gamified it.
00:28:19.760 He said, I'm going
00:28:20.780 to enjoy going on
00:28:21.680 this interview and
00:28:22.500 going through the
00:28:23.520 process.
00:28:24.320 And in the process
00:28:24.880 I'm going to get
00:28:25.540 good at interviewing.
00:28:27.900 So one day he went
00:28:28.940 for yet another
00:28:30.040 interview.
00:28:30.820 interview that was
00:28:31.820 below the job he
00:28:32.960 already had.
00:28:34.420 So he does the
00:28:35.040 interview because that
00:28:35.940 was his process.
00:28:36.760 He had a system.
00:28:37.960 His system was he'd 0.91
00:28:38.940 always do the
00:28:39.460 interview no matter
00:28:40.560 what the job was.
00:28:42.220 So he does the
00:28:42.880 system, finishes the
00:28:44.780 interview, and the
00:28:45.940 hiring person says,
00:28:47.400 you know, you're way
00:28:48.500 overqualified for this
00:28:49.560 job.
00:28:50.260 This isn't really the
00:28:51.260 fit for you.
00:28:52.680 However, the boss of
00:28:55.220 the person in the job
00:28:56.320 we were trying to fill
00:28:57.160 is also going to be
00:28:58.300 leaving.
00:28:58.560 You might be perfect
00:29:00.160 for that job.
00:29:02.360 So he got a job and
00:29:03.800 a promotion at the
00:29:04.620 same time, accidentally.
00:29:06.940 And he took it.
00:29:08.740 Because his system was
00:29:10.200 they would just put him
00:29:11.160 in situations where
00:29:12.220 good things could
00:29:13.000 happen.
00:29:14.260 No specific good
00:29:15.460 thing.
00:29:16.500 I mean, specifically
00:29:17.460 it's a job, but he
00:29:18.700 just put himself in a
00:29:19.660 situation where over
00:29:21.020 and over again, luck
00:29:22.820 could find him.
00:29:23.980 If he stayed home
00:29:26.340 thinking about a job
00:29:27.460 or just did some
00:29:28.380 Google searches, how's
00:29:29.860 luck going to find
00:29:30.540 him?
00:29:31.140 It's not going to
00:29:31.640 find him.
00:29:32.420 He's hiding.
00:29:33.640 But he didn't hide
00:29:34.500 from luck.
00:29:35.820 He gamified his
00:29:36.880 experience, said, yeah,
00:29:38.040 go on another
00:29:38.560 interview.
00:29:38.920 This will be fun.
00:29:39.960 I'll just enjoy the
00:29:40.680 process like a game.
00:29:44.060 He's doing great.
00:29:45.180 Just ran into the
00:29:46.200 other day.
00:29:46.980 Career is just
00:29:47.940 killing it.
00:29:48.780 All right.
00:29:53.700 Does it bother you
00:29:54.880 when you hear people
00:29:55.660 called election
00:29:56.500 deniers?
00:29:58.380 Does that phrase
00:29:59.500 just get to you a
00:30:01.120 little bit like,
00:30:02.220 you know, what
00:30:06.140 about election
00:30:07.840 skeptic?
00:30:09.560 Would that bother
00:30:10.560 you?
00:30:11.760 Election skeptic.
00:30:13.740 Because I have to
00:30:15.400 admit that some of
00:30:16.460 the skeptics bring an
00:30:18.700 upon themselves by
00:30:19.880 making it an
00:30:20.640 absolute.
00:30:21.760 It would be one
00:30:22.660 thing to say we
00:30:23.560 need a system where
00:30:24.460 we can have more
00:30:25.040 confidence.
00:30:26.740 Perfectly reasonable
00:30:27.700 request.
00:30:28.960 It is not reasonable
00:30:30.020 to say that you
00:30:31.520 know with 100%
00:30:32.560 certainty that that,
00:30:34.740 let's say, 2020
00:30:35.540 election was stolen
00:30:37.760 in an important
00:30:40.760 way.
00:30:42.120 It is not reasonable
00:30:43.340 to say you know it
00:30:44.180 for sure.
00:30:46.400 Does anybody
00:30:46.760 disagree with that?
00:30:48.700 I get how big
00:30:50.420 the signals are.
00:30:52.200 The signals are
00:30:53.100 like just flashing.
00:30:55.360 But how many of
00:30:56.220 those flashing
00:30:56.960 signals have been
00:30:57.960 debunked so far?
00:30:59.840 Like all of them?
00:31:01.520 Or almost all of
00:31:02.720 them?
00:31:04.660 And so he says
00:31:05.400 none.
00:31:06.340 Well, there wasn't
00:31:07.120 any Kraken,
00:31:08.640 was there?
00:31:09.360 There wasn't any
00:31:10.340 Venezuelan general
00:31:12.380 involved with anything.
00:31:13.440 So here's what I
00:31:17.260 suggest.
00:31:17.780 I think we should
00:31:18.480 have a name for
00:31:19.320 the other side.
00:31:20.680 The people who
00:31:21.520 believe elections
00:31:22.560 are definitely,
00:31:23.980 totally,
00:31:25.140 no doubt about it,
00:31:26.960 absolutely good.
00:31:31.780 Don't we need a name
00:31:32.800 for them?
00:31:34.220 I'm going to call
00:31:35.000 them the election
00:31:35.780 gullibles.
00:31:36.360 Because you'd be
00:31:39.060 gullible as hell
00:31:39.980 if the reason that
00:31:42.020 you think the
00:31:42.500 election was valid
00:31:43.500 was because the
00:31:45.780 least credible
00:31:46.900 institutions that
00:31:48.340 we've ever seen
00:31:49.180 in our human
00:31:50.300 existence told you
00:31:52.060 they were fine.
00:31:54.300 Because you didn't
00:31:55.200 do an audit,
00:31:55.800 did you?
00:31:56.620 Did any of you
00:31:57.480 audit the entire
00:31:58.300 election in 2020?
00:31:59.460 I didn't.
00:32:00.960 I was busy.
00:32:01.860 Maybe other
00:32:03.980 people did.
00:32:05.500 So if other
00:32:06.100 people audit
00:32:06.660 something and
00:32:07.280 tell you about
00:32:07.980 it, you don't
00:32:09.360 know what
00:32:09.700 happened.
00:32:10.080 You only know
00:32:10.520 what they told
00:32:10.940 you.
00:32:12.060 Am I right?
00:32:13.680 If somebody
00:32:14.460 else does an
00:32:15.100 audit and then
00:32:15.700 they tell you
00:32:16.180 what happened,
00:32:17.300 you don't know
00:32:17.860 what happened.
00:32:18.300 You only know
00:32:18.740 what they told
00:32:19.180 you.
00:32:20.500 So the people
00:32:22.500 who are just
00:32:23.140 absolutely,
00:32:24.240 positively convinced
00:32:25.540 this election
00:32:26.620 or any other
00:32:27.300 election had no
00:32:28.560 problems at all.
00:32:30.420 They're gullible.
00:32:32.860 Now, they
00:32:33.480 might be right.
00:32:36.220 Can you handle
00:32:37.040 that nuance?
00:32:38.660 They could be
00:32:39.340 gullible for
00:32:40.840 believing somebody
00:32:41.700 who shouldn't be
00:32:42.320 believed.
00:32:43.940 But sometimes it
00:32:44.940 might be true.
00:32:46.180 It might be true 1.00
00:32:47.160 that the election
00:32:47.720 was fine.
00:32:49.160 I'm completely
00:32:50.000 open to that,
00:32:50.660 by the way.
00:32:51.400 I'm completely
00:32:52.060 open to it.
00:32:52.680 It might have
00:32:52.920 been fine.
00:32:53.720 Maybe.
00:32:54.420 Maybe just there
00:32:55.500 were more mail-in
00:32:56.680 votes and maybe 0.99
00:32:58.080 people just wanted
00:32:58.800 to go to sleep at
00:32:59.580 night and recount
00:33:00.220 in the morning
00:33:00.800 when they had
00:33:01.740 more votes
00:33:02.220 coming in
00:33:02.640 by mail.
00:33:03.580 Maybe.
00:33:04.540 Who knows?
00:33:07.020 You know,
00:33:07.680 the...
00:33:08.620 I just want
00:33:09.660 to toss this
00:33:10.160 down here
00:33:10.520 as a possibility,
00:33:11.620 but the people
00:33:13.200 who wondered
00:33:13.580 why the elections
00:33:14.220 were stopped
00:33:14.920 overnight,
00:33:16.360 wasn't it because
00:33:17.500 there were still
00:33:17.980 votes coming in
00:33:18.820 and there was
00:33:19.820 no point in
00:33:20.340 working overnight
00:33:21.080 if you knew
00:33:22.140 you had to come
00:33:22.640 back in the
00:33:23.040 morning anyway
00:33:23.560 because there
00:33:24.680 would still
00:33:24.920 be votes
00:33:25.320 coming in?
00:33:25.780 because it
00:33:27.320 seems like
00:33:27.660 they kept
00:33:27.940 finding them,
00:33:28.680 right?
00:33:30.380 I don't know.
00:33:31.580 Somebody says
00:33:32.160 no,
00:33:32.520 I'm just
00:33:33.020 floating that
00:33:33.800 possibility.
00:33:34.260 All right,
00:33:35.900 well,
00:33:36.060 there's some
00:33:36.360 things that
00:33:36.720 we don't
00:33:37.000 understand,
00:33:38.580 but I'm
00:33:38.980 going to say,
00:33:39.560 I'm going to
00:33:39.860 start using
00:33:40.300 this,
00:33:40.620 the election
00:33:41.060 gullibles,
00:33:42.160 because if
00:33:42.820 the least
00:33:43.580 credible
00:33:44.100 institutions
00:33:44.920 in the world
00:33:45.620 told you
00:33:46.080 something was
00:33:46.680 good,
00:33:47.620 you don't
00:33:49.000 have any
00:33:49.460 evidence.
00:33:50.800 You're gullible
00:33:51.460 if you believe
00:33:52.220 it to be
00:33:53.500 absolutely
00:33:53.980 true.
00:33:54.920 You're not
00:33:55.600 gullible if
00:33:56.320 you simply
00:33:56.780 act as
00:33:57.320 though it's
00:33:57.600 true.
00:33:58.760 That would
00:33:59.420 be actually
00:34:00.060 just a
00:34:00.500 reasonable
00:34:00.780 thing to
00:34:01.200 do.
00:34:01.860 We can
00:34:02.480 act as
00:34:03.080 though it's
00:34:03.420 true.
00:34:05.120 I think
00:34:05.780 we do.
00:34:09.320 Lindsey
00:34:09.840 Graham,
00:34:10.740 yesterday was
00:34:13.740 such a weird
00:34:14.280 day because
00:34:15.440 both the
00:34:15.940 Republicans
00:34:16.360 and the
00:34:17.400 Democrats
00:34:18.600 just completely
00:34:19.680 failed in
00:34:20.960 their political
00:34:21.660 messaging.
00:34:23.500 Lindsey Graham
00:34:24.580 decides that
00:34:27.300 this would
00:34:27.600 be a good
00:34:27.980 time to
00:34:29.020 introduce a
00:34:29.640 bill to
00:34:30.000 ban abortion 0.98
00:34:30.680 nationwide after
00:34:31.580 15 weeks.
00:34:33.040 Now, I'm
00:34:34.140 not going to
00:34:34.500 give you any
00:34:34.960 opinions on
00:34:35.540 abortion because
00:34:37.020 I have a
00:34:37.740 cock.
00:34:38.760 Everybody
00:34:39.120 okay with
00:34:39.600 that?
00:34:41.120 You don't
00:34:41.720 want to hear
00:34:42.100 my opinion
00:34:43.080 on abortion
00:34:43.640 because I
00:34:44.440 have a
00:34:44.680 cock.
00:34:45.620 So, if
00:34:46.680 you want an
00:34:47.120 opinion on
00:34:47.580 abortion, ask
00:34:48.180 a woman and
00:34:49.960 then tell me
00:34:50.820 what she
00:34:51.100 said.
00:34:52.440 That's my
00:34:53.200 view on
00:34:53.540 opinion.
00:34:54.580 I'm going
00:34:55.140 to take the
00:34:55.780 cock exception
00:34:57.920 option out
00:34:58.760 because I
00:35:00.000 don't want you
00:35:00.400 to be thinking
00:35:00.940 about my
00:35:01.420 opinion on
00:35:01.900 abortion when
00:35:02.540 I tell you
00:35:03.100 this story.
00:35:04.240 This is just
00:35:05.020 a political
00:35:05.480 story.
00:35:06.400 The political
00:35:07.120 story is
00:35:08.380 why the
00:35:09.060 hell would
00:35:10.580 you bring
00:35:10.940 up the
00:35:11.620 one thing
00:35:12.120 that can
00:35:12.480 destroy your 0.68
00:35:13.280 election
00:35:13.660 possibilities when
00:35:14.840 everything is
00:35:15.340 going well for
00:35:16.060 the Republicans
00:35:16.620 or largely
00:35:17.680 and then you
00:35:19.160 bring up the
00:35:19.680 one topic that
00:35:20.680 could derail
00:35:21.300 everything?
00:35:23.200 Now, if
00:35:24.260 somebody said
00:35:24.800 he does
00:35:25.140 this every
00:35:25.580 year, he
00:35:26.780 floats the
00:35:27.860 idea every
00:35:28.400 year, is
00:35:28.740 that true?
00:35:29.840 But that
00:35:30.400 wouldn't be an
00:35:31.200 explanation for
00:35:32.380 why he did
00:35:32.800 it this year.
00:35:34.080 Yeah, it
00:35:34.580 doesn't matter
00:35:35.060 that he does
00:35:35.580 this every
00:35:36.040 year.
00:35:37.880 I mean, maybe
00:35:38.320 that's his
00:35:38.820 explanation.
00:35:40.480 But it's
00:35:41.560 still insanely
00:35:42.760 dumb if you
00:35:43.920 want your team
00:35:44.500 to win.
00:35:46.760 Now, since
00:35:47.540 that's just an
00:35:48.200 internal political
00:35:48.960 thing, that's
00:35:49.640 more his problem
00:35:50.460 and the
00:35:51.020 Republicans
00:35:51.500 problem.
00:35:52.460 But it's
00:35:52.700 fun to
00:35:53.080 watch.
00:35:54.940 I love
00:35:55.640 watching a
00:35:56.320 politician make
00:35:57.080 a mistake that
00:35:57.780 not one of
00:35:58.540 us would have
00:35:59.040 made.
00:36:00.360 Would you
00:36:00.960 have made
00:36:01.280 that mistake?
00:36:03.780 Seriously,
00:36:04.420 would you?
00:36:05.320 You would have
00:36:06.000 known not to
00:36:06.600 do that, right?
00:36:08.000 I feel like
00:36:08.560 everybody would
00:36:09.520 have.
00:36:10.560 So, I
00:36:11.020 don't know,
00:36:11.260 maybe he has
00:36:11.700 some four
00:36:12.880 dimensional game
00:36:13.680 that we're not
00:36:14.140 seeing.
00:36:15.260 And it could
00:36:15.780 be that he's
00:36:16.280 just being
00:36:16.640 consistent.
00:36:18.200 It could
00:36:18.520 be.
00:36:18.720 But it's
00:36:20.500 a weird
00:36:21.200 time to be
00:36:21.860 consistent.
00:36:23.800 A weird
00:36:24.180 time to do
00:36:24.740 it.
00:36:25.660 At the same
00:36:26.180 time, Joe
00:36:28.000 Biden was
00:36:28.580 giving his
00:36:29.200 celebrating the
00:36:33.060 end of
00:36:33.480 inflation, while
00:36:34.800 even CNN was
00:36:35.860 showing at the
00:36:36.680 same time the
00:36:37.960 stock market
00:36:38.660 plunging 1,200
00:36:39.560 points because
00:36:41.020 nobody believed
00:36:41.920 that inflation
00:36:42.900 is done because
00:36:43.680 the new numbers
00:36:44.340 were so bad.
00:36:45.700 They were so
00:36:46.260 bad, but they
00:36:46.880 were not good.
00:36:48.720 Now, watching
00:36:50.320 the images of
00:36:53.920 all those happy
00:36:54.580 Democrats
00:36:55.200 celebrating when
00:36:56.240 the world was
00:36:56.840 burning was
00:36:58.660 just the worst.
00:36:59.940 Just the worst.
00:37:01.040 And Dana
00:37:01.460 Perino did the
00:37:02.920 best job of
00:37:03.800 eviscerating the
00:37:05.460 Democrats on
00:37:06.240 this.
00:37:06.840 As she noted,
00:37:08.420 before you put
00:37:09.200 on an event,
00:37:10.920 check the
00:37:11.400 calendar.
00:37:12.860 Basic stuff.
00:37:14.440 Check the
00:37:14.940 calendar.
00:37:15.880 You don't want
00:37:16.300 to put on this
00:37:16.840 event the same
00:37:17.480 day the numbers
00:37:18.080 were coming
00:37:18.400 out.
00:37:19.480 If you'd
00:37:20.060 even waited
00:37:20.540 one day or
00:37:21.460 done it one
00:37:22.460 day before,
00:37:23.880 then it's not
00:37:25.000 so much a
00:37:25.520 story.
00:37:26.320 But having the
00:37:27.040 same day as
00:37:27.620 the numbers,
00:37:28.480 that was a
00:37:29.500 risky play.
00:37:32.080 Well, another
00:37:34.020 thing that I
00:37:34.520 learned in the
00:37:35.080 news today is
00:37:36.140 did you know
00:37:36.680 it's illegal to
00:37:37.840 kill people in
00:37:38.500 their sleep,
00:37:39.620 even if they
00:37:41.100 have it coming?
00:37:43.360 That just
00:37:44.140 feels like it
00:37:44.740 shouldn't be a
00:37:45.200 law.
00:37:45.400 So the
00:37:46.600 specific here is
00:37:47.780 there was a
00:37:48.360 15-year-old
00:37:49.140 girl who
00:37:51.040 was repeatedly
00:37:52.040 raped by a 0.92
00:37:53.420 man in his
00:37:53.960 30s, and
00:37:55.980 at one point
00:37:56.680 at knife
00:37:57.520 point.
00:37:58.920 So there was
00:37:59.520 violence involved.
00:38:00.780 We're not
00:38:01.420 talking about
00:38:01.840 statutory rape,
00:38:03.360 so it's not
00:38:03.980 just that she
00:38:04.780 was underage.
00:38:06.080 She was
00:38:06.580 actually raped 0.96
00:38:08.000 by force
00:38:08.600 at knife
00:38:10.580 point.
00:38:10.860 At one
00:38:11.840 point, the
00:38:12.240 guy fell
00:38:12.660 asleep, and
00:38:14.520 she got
00:38:14.920 access to
00:38:15.460 the knife
00:38:15.820 that was
00:38:16.040 on the
00:38:16.460 bedstand or
00:38:17.440 something, and
00:38:18.680 she stabbed 0.75
00:38:19.400 him to death
00:38:20.100 as he
00:38:21.600 presumably woke
00:38:22.960 up while he
00:38:23.420 was being
00:38:23.680 stabbed to
00:38:24.140 death.
00:38:25.160 And she
00:38:25.840 was convicted
00:38:26.480 of involuntary
00:38:29.420 manslaughter and
00:38:30.480 willful injury.
00:38:32.440 She won't
00:38:33.400 necessarily serve
00:38:34.460 time in jail,
00:38:35.340 so she
00:38:38.880 looks like
00:38:39.360 she's going
00:38:39.700 to get a
00:38:40.240 deferred prison
00:38:40.980 sentence.
00:38:42.040 But she
00:38:42.460 could serve
00:38:42.920 10 years if
00:38:43.800 she violates 1.00
00:38:44.380 probation, up
00:38:45.400 to 20, I
00:38:45.960 think.
00:38:46.840 But here's
00:38:47.420 the weird
00:38:47.720 part.
00:38:48.100 Iowa has
00:38:48.760 this mandatory
00:38:49.500 rule that
00:38:51.240 if you're
00:38:51.680 found guilty
00:38:52.280 of this
00:38:52.720 crime and
00:38:53.420 this kind
00:38:54.000 of situation,
00:38:54.760 as she
00:38:55.100 was, that
00:38:56.800 she has to
00:38:58.500 pay the
00:38:58.880 family of
00:38:59.600 the deceased
00:39:00.340 $150,000
00:39:02.260 in restitution.
00:39:03.960 I'm not
00:39:04.300 sure how they
00:39:04.800 calculate it.
00:39:05.340 So she
00:39:07.340 has to pay
00:39:08.000 her rapist
00:39:09.020 $150,000.
00:39:11.760 They rape his
00:39:12.200 family because
00:39:12.760 he's dead.
00:39:14.560 Now, let
00:39:16.100 me ask you
00:39:16.520 this.
00:39:18.220 What is the
00:39:19.060 definition of
00:39:19.840 self-defense?
00:39:21.460 Now, here
00:39:21.900 clearly it's
00:39:22.640 being defined
00:39:23.320 as not
00:39:23.960 immediate
00:39:24.420 danger.
00:39:25.840 But if
00:39:26.420 you've been
00:39:26.840 repeatedly
00:39:27.800 raped by 0.99
00:39:29.460 a guy with
00:39:29.980 a knife,
00:39:31.500 and he
00:39:32.440 falls asleep
00:39:33.100 for a minute,
00:39:33.680 and you
00:39:33.920 knife him 0.98
00:39:34.320 to death, 0.96
00:39:34.720 are you
00:39:35.540 telling me
00:39:35.880 that's not
00:39:36.300 self-defense?
00:39:38.640 Because I
00:39:39.380 get the
00:39:39.740 whole it's
00:39:40.380 not a
00:39:40.720 media thing,
00:39:41.980 but it's
00:39:43.000 guaranteed.
00:39:45.880 If it's
00:39:46.580 guaranteed but
00:39:47.500 not immediate,
00:39:48.280 you can't
00:39:48.740 kill somebody?
00:39:50.180 It's guaranteed
00:39:51.060 that when he
00:39:52.300 wakes up he's
00:39:52.900 still going to
00:39:53.260 be a rapist. 0.85
00:39:54.180 If you put
00:39:56.840 me on that
00:39:57.380 jury, I
00:39:58.820 would have
00:39:59.140 hung that
00:39:59.660 jury so
00:40:00.260 hard.
00:40:02.340 There would
00:40:03.260 be no way
00:40:03.800 in the world
00:40:04.100 they'd ever
00:40:04.540 get me to
00:40:05.000 vote guilty
00:40:05.740 on anything.
00:40:07.480 Now, I get,
00:40:08.820 I've been on
00:40:09.360 juries, so I
00:40:10.740 know the judge
00:40:11.520 would make
00:40:12.160 sure that you
00:40:12.740 knew it's
00:40:13.380 not your
00:40:13.840 duty to
00:40:16.260 find justice.
00:40:17.700 That's not
00:40:18.160 the job of
00:40:18.720 the juries.
00:40:19.840 The juries
00:40:20.360 are not
00:40:20.980 there to
00:40:21.380 find justice.
00:40:22.600 That is not
00:40:23.140 their job.
00:40:24.520 They're there
00:40:24.960 to determine
00:40:25.620 if the
00:40:26.100 evidence
00:40:26.560 demonstrated
00:40:28.120 that the
00:40:28.520 crime had
00:40:28.980 been committed.
00:40:30.420 That's it.
00:40:31.720 And it looks
00:40:32.320 like that's
00:40:32.740 what they
00:40:33.000 did.
00:40:34.320 And I've
00:40:35.020 often said
00:40:35.520 that serving
00:40:36.240 jury duty
00:40:36.940 should be
00:40:38.260 just something
00:40:39.340 you should
00:40:39.660 all do.
00:40:40.720 Just to
00:40:41.260 feel how
00:40:42.040 serious the
00:40:43.560 people in
00:40:43.980 the jury
00:40:44.360 take this
00:40:45.180 stuff.
00:40:46.120 Like, until
00:40:46.540 you feel how
00:40:47.220 serious your
00:40:48.700 fellow citizens
00:40:49.460 are about
00:40:50.060 getting it
00:40:50.560 right on
00:40:51.280 a jury, you
00:40:52.520 don't feel
00:40:53.220 the country's
00:40:54.180 cohesiveness.
00:40:55.580 It's easy to
00:40:56.400 feel like we're
00:40:57.220 not together.
00:40:58.400 But boy, you
00:40:59.040 take 12
00:40:59.680 strangers from
00:41:01.220 any demographic
00:41:03.120 group, you
00:41:04.540 put them
00:41:04.920 together and
00:41:05.440 you say,
00:41:05.900 you're in
00:41:06.200 charge of
00:41:07.280 this guy
00:41:07.700 going to
00:41:08.140 jail or
00:41:08.660 not.
00:41:09.800 They take
00:41:10.520 that job 0.53
00:41:11.020 really seriously.
00:41:12.920 And when
00:41:13.200 you see that,
00:41:14.180 that gives
00:41:14.600 you faith in
00:41:15.360 the whole thing.
00:41:16.140 So it's a
00:41:16.600 very important
00:41:17.020 process.
00:41:17.540 If you want
00:41:17.880 to be a
00:41:18.140 good patriot,
00:41:19.340 good citizen,
00:41:20.480 do jury duty
00:41:21.900 at least once.
00:41:23.180 You've got to
00:41:23.880 experience it.
00:41:26.080 But anyway,
00:41:26.740 you put me
00:41:27.280 on that jury
00:41:27.880 and I
00:41:28.520 wouldn't give
00:41:28.900 a fuck
00:41:29.400 what the
00:41:29.740 Constitution
00:41:30.120 said.
00:41:31.380 I wouldn't
00:41:32.220 care what
00:41:32.700 the law
00:41:33.160 said.
00:41:33.660 I wouldn't
00:41:34.040 care how
00:41:34.580 many angry
00:41:35.360 jurors there
00:41:36.040 were who
00:41:36.480 waited too
00:41:36.940 long.
00:41:37.900 There is
00:41:38.320 no way,
00:41:39.760 no way,
00:41:41.140 I would
00:41:41.580 have allowed
00:41:43.120 this 15
00:41:44.620 year old
00:41:45.040 girl who
00:41:45.560 ended her 0.82
00:41:46.180 own horror
00:41:46.760 by stabbing
00:41:47.500 to death
00:41:47.920 the fucker
00:41:48.880 who had
00:41:49.180 raped her.
00:41:50.280 I would
00:41:50.860 give her
00:41:51.200 an award.
00:41:52.460 There's no
00:41:53.080 way.
00:41:54.160 You could
00:41:54.640 not torture
00:41:55.300 me enough
00:41:55.880 to vote
00:41:57.000 guilty on
00:41:57.500 this case.
00:41:58.000 Am I
00:41:59.520 wrong?
00:42:00.780 How many
00:42:01.420 of you
00:42:02.540 would allow
00:42:03.300 her to 0.94
00:42:03.700 be convicted?
00:42:08.140 Yeah.
00:42:09.120 How did
00:42:09.660 they find
00:42:10.040 12 people
00:42:10.620 who were
00:42:10.920 willing to
00:42:11.320 do this?
00:42:12.460 And I
00:42:12.680 think the
00:42:13.000 answer is,
00:42:14.260 so here's
00:42:14.720 the answer.
00:42:16.160 Once you
00:42:16.800 get in that
00:42:17.300 situation,
00:42:18.620 you take it
00:42:19.660 so seriously
00:42:20.600 that you
00:42:21.840 do end up
00:42:22.640 respecting the
00:42:23.660 system over
00:42:24.260 the person.
00:42:25.840 And I
00:42:26.100 think that's
00:42:26.460 what happened.
00:42:27.640 I think the
00:42:28.140 people who
00:42:28.520 were there
00:42:28.720 respected the
00:42:29.540 system.
00:42:30.760 And I
00:42:31.140 don't hate
00:42:31.600 that.
00:42:32.560 I don't
00:42:33.220 hate that
00:42:33.760 because I
00:42:34.360 like them
00:42:34.740 respecting that
00:42:35.440 system.
00:42:36.400 But it
00:42:37.120 cost her
00:42:38.640 some justice.
00:42:40.420 This was
00:42:40.720 not justice.
00:42:42.480 Was not
00:42:43.200 justice.
00:42:45.060 All right.
00:42:46.840 CNN is
00:42:47.540 reporting that
00:42:48.040 more than
00:42:48.740 half of the
00:42:49.280 GOP Senate
00:42:49.920 candidates
00:42:50.520 doubted the
00:42:52.640 2020 election.
00:42:54.540 That sounds
00:42:54.980 about right.
00:42:56.640 Half of them
00:42:57.200 doubted it.
00:42:57.760 But again,
00:42:59.680 they didn't
00:43:00.140 use the
00:43:00.460 word denier.
00:43:02.580 I think
00:43:03.240 doubt is
00:43:03.760 fair.
00:43:05.720 Don't you
00:43:06.320 think?
00:43:07.000 I think
00:43:07.480 people can
00:43:07.940 have doubt
00:43:08.480 about
00:43:08.920 institutions
00:43:09.580 which are
00:43:10.180 part of a
00:43:11.120 system which
00:43:11.940 is entirely
00:43:12.640 non-credible.
00:43:18.880 I don't know.
00:43:19.620 I'm not
00:43:19.900 worried about
00:43:20.340 that.
00:43:21.880 I'm not
00:43:22.500 worried about
00:43:23.020 half of them
00:43:23.880 doubting an
00:43:24.760 election.
00:43:25.040 Are you?
00:43:29.720 Does that
00:43:30.260 bother anybody 0.58
00:43:30.840 that half
00:43:31.520 of those
00:43:31.800 candidates
00:43:32.240 doubted the
00:43:33.080 2020 election?
00:43:35.140 That doesn't
00:43:35.760 bother me at
00:43:36.180 all.
00:43:39.040 Yeah,
00:43:39.460 not at all.
00:43:44.340 There was a
00:43:45.180 hilarious
00:43:45.680 trending thing.
00:43:48.200 Erin Burnett
00:43:48.940 from CNN,
00:43:49.760 her name was
00:43:50.260 trending on
00:43:50.860 Twitter.
00:43:51.960 So I thought,
00:43:52.700 oh, let's
00:43:53.080 see what this
00:43:53.480 is.
00:43:54.340 And I go
00:43:54.740 there and
00:43:55.260 it was,
00:43:57.180 she was
00:43:58.660 trending because
00:43:59.500 she was
00:43:59.900 talking about
00:44:00.520 the Hunter
00:44:01.100 Biden laptop
00:44:02.440 and how it
00:44:04.240 wasn't Russian
00:44:05.220 disinformation.
00:44:08.080 And, you
00:44:08.420 know,
00:44:08.580 basically she
00:44:09.360 told the
00:44:10.380 story the
00:44:11.700 way you
00:44:12.020 know the
00:44:12.380 story.
00:44:13.680 What do
00:44:14.240 you think
00:44:14.540 CNN viewers
00:44:15.500 did when
00:44:16.740 Erin Burnett
00:44:17.500 accurately told
00:44:18.720 a story of
00:44:19.520 great importance
00:44:20.280 to the
00:44:20.660 country?
00:44:20.940 how did
00:44:22.440 the CNN
00:44:22.880 viewers
00:44:23.500 handle an
00:44:25.760 objective
00:44:26.260 reporting of
00:44:27.300 true news
00:44:28.060 that is
00:44:29.140 important to
00:44:29.700 the country?
00:44:31.460 Re,
00:44:32.780 re,
00:44:33.940 I'm never
00:44:34.800 watching this
00:44:35.420 channel again.
00:44:37.280 And you
00:44:38.440 have to read
00:44:39.060 the comments
00:44:39.740 to even know
00:44:41.460 that these
00:44:41.860 people exist.
00:44:43.040 And when I
00:44:43.360 say these
00:44:43.800 people,
00:44:44.980 I mean,
00:44:45.540 apparently,
00:44:47.040 this is just
00:44:47.660 my interpretation
00:44:48.320 from the
00:44:48.900 comments,
00:44:50.300 there were
00:44:51.700 quite a
00:44:52.620 number of
00:44:53.060 people who
00:44:53.500 watched CNN
00:44:54.140 who were
00:44:55.560 not aware
00:44:56.300 that it
00:44:58.140 was trying
00:44:58.620 to be
00:44:58.960 news.
00:45:02.460 I don't
00:45:03.120 think they
00:45:03.480 understood
00:45:03.840 that.
00:45:04.780 I think
00:45:05.240 they understood
00:45:05.800 it as a
00:45:06.540 team member.
00:45:08.500 And as
00:45:08.900 soon as the
00:45:09.400 team member
00:45:09.960 started giving
00:45:10.680 news,
00:45:11.600 they were
00:45:11.720 like,
00:45:11.940 whoa,
00:45:12.860 that's not
00:45:13.260 what we
00:45:13.560 signed up
00:45:14.020 for.
00:45:14.920 We signed
00:45:15.600 up for you
00:45:15.960 to be on
00:45:16.240 our team.
00:45:16.660 Why are
00:45:17.960 you on
00:45:18.200 the other
00:45:18.440 team?
00:45:19.180 And if
00:45:19.400 you look
00:45:20.200 at the
00:45:20.500 comments,
00:45:21.680 it's entirely
00:45:22.380 clear that
00:45:23.740 the reason
00:45:24.340 they're angry
00:45:25.000 is that
00:45:27.040 their team
00:45:27.480 isn't being
00:45:27.940 supported.
00:45:29.220 They're not
00:45:29.940 angry about
00:45:30.520 the accuracy
00:45:31.140 of the
00:45:31.500 news.
00:45:32.500 They're not
00:45:33.200 complaining
00:45:33.640 that it's
00:45:33.960 not true.
00:45:35.240 And they're
00:45:35.560 not complaining
00:45:36.160 that it's
00:45:36.460 not important.
00:45:37.780 They're only
00:45:38.340 complaining that
00:45:39.580 they didn't
00:45:39.960 back their
00:45:40.420 side.
00:45:41.800 And they're
00:45:42.160 acting like
00:45:42.620 that's the
00:45:43.020 job of a 0.65
00:45:43.560 news entity.
00:45:45.420 But, you
00:45:46.640 know, that's
00:45:47.000 CNN's own
00:45:47.600 fault, right?
00:45:48.780 CNN created
00:45:49.840 a product that
00:45:51.720 even the people
00:45:52.480 who watched
00:45:53.000 it knew was
00:45:54.620 not news.
00:45:56.220 Think about
00:45:56.840 that.
00:45:58.020 Their own
00:45:58.560 viewers knew
00:45:59.100 it wasn't
00:45:59.460 news.
00:46:00.240 I wasn't
00:46:00.660 sure that
00:46:01.020 was true.
00:46:02.260 But now we
00:46:02.920 have something
00:46:03.600 like confirmation.
00:46:05.200 Didn't you
00:46:05.460 always wonder?
00:46:06.220 Didn't you
00:46:06.840 always wonder
00:46:07.480 if CNN
00:46:08.140 viewers,
00:46:09.040 let's say
00:46:09.460 all of
00:46:10.020 them,
00:46:10.860 believed they
00:46:11.580 were watching
00:46:12.100 actual news?
00:46:13.020 But it
00:46:14.560 turns out
00:46:14.920 that they
00:46:15.220 knew they
00:46:15.500 weren't
00:46:15.700 watching actual
00:46:16.300 news.
00:46:16.620 They knew
00:46:16.860 it was
00:46:17.080 just team
00:46:17.620 play.
00:46:19.220 Now you
00:46:19.740 see the
00:46:20.060 same thing
00:46:20.520 with Fox
00:46:21.220 News.
00:46:22.300 So I'm
00:46:22.820 going to
00:46:23.380 burn all
00:46:23.880 of my
00:46:24.120 bridges
00:46:24.360 here.
00:46:25.680 When Fox
00:46:26.580 News reports
00:46:27.300 a story
00:46:27.860 down the
00:46:28.620 middle,
00:46:29.760 you see
00:46:30.400 all the
00:46:30.680 screaming.
00:46:32.460 People go
00:46:33.180 nuts.
00:46:34.000 Oh no,
00:46:34.800 that was an
00:46:35.280 objective
00:46:35.680 statement there.
00:46:36.480 I can't
00:46:36.780 handle that.
00:46:37.620 I will
00:46:37.940 never watch
00:46:38.480 your network
00:46:38.960 again.
00:46:40.100 So just
00:46:40.940 like the
00:46:41.740 Fox News
00:46:42.280 viewers,
00:46:42.640 there's no
00:46:43.080 difference.
00:46:44.040 The CNN
00:46:44.480 viewers are
00:46:45.160 watching what
00:46:46.140 should be
00:46:47.440 news.
00:46:48.460 They're just
00:46:49.120 watching it
00:46:49.640 as a team
00:46:50.780 member.
00:46:53.620 This is a
00:46:58.100 funny story.
00:46:59.560 I forget
00:47:00.220 where I saw
00:47:00.640 this.
00:47:01.120 I wish I
00:47:01.540 remembered.
00:47:02.660 But apparently
00:47:03.300 there are
00:47:03.840 phrases that
00:47:04.820 are turning
00:47:05.240 off younger
00:47:05.920 job seekers.
00:47:09.780 I don't
00:47:11.380 know if
00:47:11.640 this is true
00:47:12.180 at all.
00:47:12.640 because everybody
00:47:14.520 always complains
00:47:15.260 about the
00:47:15.620 next generation.
00:47:16.960 So take it
00:47:17.520 with a grain
00:47:17.920 of salt how
00:47:18.440 much of
00:47:18.720 this is true.
00:47:20.100 But anecdotally
00:47:20.860 it's just
00:47:21.240 funny so I'm
00:47:21.840 going to
00:47:21.920 report it
00:47:22.340 like it's
00:47:22.700 true.
00:47:24.500 But apparently
00:47:25.280 the young
00:47:25.800 people who
00:47:26.300 are not so
00:47:26.900 big on
00:47:27.500 working too
00:47:28.620 hard,
00:47:29.660 they're looking
00:47:30.160 for more of
00:47:30.680 a work-life
00:47:31.340 balance.
00:47:32.160 Nothing wrong
00:47:32.580 with that.
00:47:35.260 There's some
00:47:35.920 phrases that
00:47:36.660 they see in
00:47:37.080 job postings
00:47:38.820 that scare
00:47:39.680 them away.
00:47:41.560 So here's
00:47:42.240 some of the
00:47:43.480 things you
00:47:43.840 shouldn't put
00:47:44.320 in your job
00:47:44.880 posting if
00:47:45.900 you want
00:47:46.220 anybody under
00:47:47.040 30 to
00:47:47.600 apply.
00:47:50.140 You don't
00:47:50.980 want to say
00:47:51.480 must handle
00:47:52.140 stress well.
00:47:52.880 you don't
00:47:56.400 want to say
00:47:56.880 willing to
00:47:57.900 wear many
00:47:58.440 hats.
00:48:00.760 You don't
00:48:01.460 want to say
00:48:02.080 responsibilities
00:48:03.880 may include
00:48:04.860 those outside
00:48:06.200 the job
00:48:06.640 description.
00:48:08.680 And here's
00:48:09.400 one that's
00:48:09.780 funny.
00:48:10.720 We're one
00:48:11.220 big happy
00:48:11.720 family.
00:48:16.760 And the
00:48:17.520 reason given
00:48:18.180 for why
00:48:20.100 young people
00:48:21.080 don't want
00:48:21.560 to see
00:48:21.840 we're one
00:48:22.340 big happy
00:48:22.820 family because
00:48:24.860 it suggests
00:48:26.160 they're going
00:48:26.480 to abuse
00:48:26.880 you.
00:48:34.220 One big
00:48:34.980 happy family
00:48:35.660 makes young
00:48:36.500 people think
00:48:37.040 that that's
00:48:38.100 a signal for
00:48:38.700 abuse.
00:48:41.500 Maybe it
00:48:42.220 is.
00:48:42.500 That's even
00:48:42.860 funnier.
00:48:44.800 Another one
00:48:45.580 is applicants
00:48:46.800 should be
00:48:47.460 humble.
00:48:48.400 Have you
00:48:48.720 ever heard
00:48:49.060 that before?
00:48:50.880 Whoever
00:48:51.400 says applicants
00:48:52.240 should be
00:48:52.700 humble.
00:48:53.060 I've never
00:48:53.340 heard that
00:48:53.760 one.
00:48:54.760 But I
00:48:55.440 wouldn't work
00:48:56.380 at a job
00:48:56.820 that required
00:48:57.360 it.
00:48:58.440 Because I
00:48:59.380 don't think
00:48:59.940 I could pull
00:49:01.560 it off.
00:49:06.020 All right.
00:49:07.360 Also,
00:49:07.820 bad ones are
00:49:09.060 looking for
00:49:09.640 self-starters.
00:49:13.640 Nobody wants
00:49:14.400 to be a
00:49:14.720 self-starter.
00:49:15.300 Okay, this
00:49:20.860 was a survey
00:49:22.580 by payroll
00:49:23.500 processor
00:49:24.100 paychecks.
00:49:26.400 Oh, God,
00:49:27.180 that's funny.
00:49:27.560 So, do you
00:49:38.140 remember when
00:49:38.800 Hillary Clinton's
00:49:40.560 lawyer,
00:49:41.980 Sussman,
00:49:43.020 he was
00:49:43.940 accused of
00:49:44.780 lying to
00:49:45.420 the FBI
00:49:46.100 in saying
00:49:48.020 that,
00:49:49.040 no, I'm
00:49:50.440 not high in
00:49:51.280 case you're
00:49:51.580 wondering.
00:49:52.420 He was
00:49:53.020 accused of
00:49:53.400 lying to the
00:49:53.880 FBI and
00:49:54.940 saying that
00:49:55.380 he was not
00:49:56.020 working for
00:49:56.620 Clinton when
00:49:58.260 he brought
00:49:58.640 them information
00:49:59.720 that was
00:50:00.320 maybe bad
00:50:00.980 about Trump.
00:50:02.840 And do you
00:50:03.300 remember he
00:50:03.680 went, so
00:50:04.660 he was
00:50:05.740 taken to
00:50:07.580 trial.
00:50:09.220 Do you
00:50:09.560 know what
00:50:10.120 happened in
00:50:10.560 the trial?
00:50:11.800 How many
00:50:12.240 of you know
00:50:12.940 what happened
00:50:14.080 with Sussman?
00:50:14.780 Don't look
00:50:15.140 it up.
00:50:16.220 And don't
00:50:16.500 say the
00:50:16.820 answer.
00:50:17.120 Just say
00:50:17.400 if you
00:50:17.640 know.
00:50:18.600 Do you
00:50:18.820 know what
00:50:19.620 the end
00:50:20.020 of the
00:50:20.240 result was?
00:50:24.180 Yeah,
00:50:24.500 D.C.
00:50:24.920 jury is
00:50:25.240 part of
00:50:25.500 it.
00:50:25.640 It's a
00:50:25.940 hint.
00:50:27.300 I just
00:50:27.500 wondered
00:50:27.740 how, oh
00:50:28.780 most of
00:50:29.080 you knew.
00:50:30.040 Yeah, okay.
00:50:31.220 Most of
00:50:31.540 the people
00:50:31.740 are locals
00:50:32.160 now.
00:50:33.000 On
00:50:33.320 YouTube, you
00:50:33.960 see yes
00:50:34.320 and no.
00:50:34.740 The answer
00:50:35.240 is that he
00:50:35.840 was acquitted.
00:50:37.860 That's it.
00:50:38.480 He didn't,
00:50:39.160 according to
00:50:39.680 the legal
00:50:40.060 system, he
00:50:41.240 is a person
00:50:41.800 who did
00:50:42.280 not commit
00:50:42.840 a crime.
00:50:43.860 It wasn't
00:50:44.300 a hung
00:50:44.580 jury.
00:50:46.140 It wasn't
00:50:46.560 a hung
00:50:46.880 jury.
00:50:47.420 Twelve
00:50:47.780 jurors said
00:50:48.480 no, he
00:50:48.800 did not
00:50:49.120 commit a
00:50:49.480 crime.
00:50:50.480 Did you
00:50:50.820 see that
00:50:51.200 coming?
00:50:52.560 And I
00:50:53.080 think it
00:50:53.280 had to do
00:50:53.660 with the
00:50:53.920 fact that he
00:50:54.500 was in
00:50:54.800 the room
00:50:55.140 with only
00:50:55.520 one person
00:50:56.300 when the
00:50:59.040 alleged claim
00:51:00.700 was made.
00:51:01.780 So I
00:51:02.300 believe his
00:51:02.760 defense was
00:51:03.520 I say it
00:51:05.220 didn't happen,
00:51:05.940 the one
00:51:06.240 person in
00:51:06.620 the room
00:51:06.820 says it
00:51:07.240 did,
00:51:08.040 that's your
00:51:08.560 whole case.
00:51:11.080 And if I
00:51:11.840 were on the
00:51:12.220 jury and that
00:51:12.900 was the
00:51:13.240 evidence, the
00:51:14.320 one person in
00:51:14.980 the room said
00:51:15.460 it happened,
00:51:16.680 the other
00:51:17.040 person in
00:51:17.460 the room said
00:51:17.880 it didn't
00:51:18.180 happen, I
00:51:20.160 would have
00:51:20.940 acquitted.
00:51:21.880 Wouldn't
00:51:22.140 you?
00:51:22.300 Now this
00:51:23.900 isn't like
00:51:24.420 the woman 0.98
00:51:25.540 who stabbed
00:51:26.280 her rapist
00:51:27.100 to death, 0.96
00:51:28.020 because that
00:51:28.480 was justice.
00:51:29.700 Killing that
00:51:30.200 guy was
00:51:30.520 justice.
00:51:31.400 But if it's
00:51:32.140 a little
00:51:32.360 paperworky lie
00:51:34.120 kind of a
00:51:34.680 thing, I
00:51:35.700 think I
00:51:36.040 would favor
00:51:36.660 the system
00:51:37.380 over punishing
00:51:39.920 an individual.
00:51:41.520 And the
00:51:42.180 system is
00:51:42.740 pretty clear.
00:51:43.420 You need
00:51:43.760 evidence for
00:51:44.440 crimes.
00:51:46.140 They didn't
00:51:46.720 have it.
00:51:47.080 They had
00:51:48.800 one witness,
00:51:49.580 but it
00:51:49.760 wasn't
00:51:50.000 enough, so
00:51:50.720 he walked.
00:51:54.580 But now
00:51:55.260 Durham is
00:51:56.120 winding down,
00:51:56.980 it looks like,
00:51:57.640 and it looks
00:51:58.220 like there
00:51:58.540 won't be any
00:51:59.180 attempted
00:52:00.300 prosecutions.
00:52:02.540 So did
00:52:03.480 you think
00:52:03.780 that Durham
00:52:04.220 was going
00:52:04.620 to uncover
00:52:05.220 the deep
00:52:05.720 state and
00:52:06.440 find all
00:52:07.860 the bad
00:52:08.220 things they
00:52:08.640 did?
00:52:09.580 Looks like
00:52:10.400 he may
00:52:10.780 have found
00:52:11.360 out a lot
00:52:11.760 of information,
00:52:13.100 but the
00:52:14.160 early signals
00:52:15.040 could be
00:52:15.420 wrong,
00:52:15.900 could be
00:52:16.280 wrong.
00:52:17.080 But the
00:52:17.320 early indications
00:52:18.080 are nobody's
00:52:18.780 going to get
00:52:19.100 charged with
00:52:19.620 anything
00:52:19.900 additionally.
00:52:22.440 So, but
00:52:25.300 in the
00:52:26.160 process, they
00:52:26.840 discovered that
00:52:27.720 Igor
00:52:28.680 Denchenko, who
00:52:31.420 worked with
00:52:32.280 Christopher Steele
00:52:33.820 to develop the
00:52:34.660 Russia collusion
00:52:35.340 stuff.
00:52:36.720 So, Christopher
00:52:37.620 Steele talked
00:52:38.320 to some
00:52:39.920 Russians.
00:52:41.260 One of the
00:52:41.780 Russians he 1.00
00:52:42.280 talked to, to
00:52:42.920 get information
00:52:43.600 that was fake,
00:52:45.420 but it was put
00:52:46.240 in the Steele
00:52:46.740 dossier to
00:52:47.580 get at
00:52:48.400 Trump, that
00:52:49.540 one of the
00:52:50.020 Russians they 0.99
00:52:50.620 talked to was
00:52:51.280 on the FBI
00:52:52.380 payroll.
00:52:57.840 We're just
00:52:58.620 finding that
00:52:59.200 out.
00:53:00.860 The Christopher
00:53:01.560 Steele source
00:53:02.480 was the FBI
00:53:03.680 itself.
00:53:06.680 Now, not
00:53:07.420 really, because
00:53:08.580 it was a paid
00:53:09.140 informant,
00:53:09.820 right?
00:53:10.060 But basically, he
00:53:14.600 got information
00:53:15.400 from the FBI
00:53:16.360 and gave it to
00:53:17.000 the FBI.
00:53:19.440 And we're just
00:53:20.280 finding that out
00:53:20.960 now.
00:53:21.920 Now, of course,
00:53:22.400 it was fake
00:53:22.840 information that
00:53:24.240 he got from the
00:53:24.940 FBI to give to
00:53:25.780 the FBI.
00:53:27.320 But that started
00:53:28.160 off the whole
00:53:28.680 thing.
00:53:31.060 Now, again,
00:53:32.360 you know, fog
00:53:32.900 of war, who
00:53:33.380 knows, maybe
00:53:33.960 some of the
00:53:34.360 details here are
00:53:35.320 exculpatory, but
00:53:36.360 that all sounds
00:53:37.640 pretty bad.
00:53:39.560 Jonathan Turley
00:53:40.280 writes about
00:53:40.840 this, so look
00:53:42.020 for Jonathan
00:53:42.680 Turley's piece
00:53:43.680 if you want to
00:53:44.840 see the smart
00:53:45.660 lawyer take on
00:53:46.380 it.
00:53:49.000 All right.
00:53:51.220 And that,
00:53:52.000 ladies and 0.98
00:53:52.380 gentlemen, brings
00:53:54.220 us to near the
00:53:54.900 conclusion of what
00:53:56.140 was the finest
00:53:56.900 live stream in
00:53:58.240 the history of
00:53:59.200 all things.
00:54:02.520 Best show
00:54:03.120 ever.
00:54:04.740 How do I feel
00:54:05.340 about, um,
00:54:07.080 Turley?
00:54:07.760 He's the best.
00:54:09.340 He does great
00:54:10.280 writing and
00:54:11.060 analysis.
00:54:14.480 Yeah, here's
00:54:15.260 another thing you
00:54:16.040 shouldn't trust.
00:54:17.880 Podesta in
00:54:18.640 charge of $300
00:54:19.640 billion in
00:54:20.680 climate stuff.
00:54:22.880 Let me give you
00:54:23.640 some optimism.
00:54:24.500 You want some
00:54:24.880 optimism?
00:54:27.360 There's one
00:54:28.800 technology that's
00:54:32.440 probably going to
00:54:33.240 be, well,
00:54:33.820 besides AI.
00:54:34.540 there's one
00:54:35.860 technology that's,
00:54:37.780 you know, there's
00:54:38.360 a lot of action
00:54:38.940 in, and it's
00:54:40.380 going to change
00:54:40.820 everything, or
00:54:42.520 not, depending on
00:54:44.380 where the
00:54:44.700 technology ends.
00:54:46.100 And that's
00:54:46.800 battery technology,
00:54:48.040 especially mass
00:54:48.940 storage, not just
00:54:50.000 for your car, but
00:54:51.360 for the network,
00:54:52.300 like, you know,
00:54:52.760 giant batteries for
00:54:53.880 storing network
00:54:55.980 power.
00:54:56.380 And it turns out
00:54:58.140 there's a bunch of
00:54:59.120 companies, and I
00:55:00.000 keep doing little
00:55:01.280 research on each
00:55:02.140 one as they pop
00:55:02.960 up.
00:55:03.820 And once you start
00:55:04.880 looking into them,
00:55:06.400 and then you also
00:55:07.480 know that part of
00:55:08.440 that infrastructure
00:55:09.380 bill that Biden
00:55:10.600 got through, a big
00:55:12.160 part of that is for
00:55:12.960 battery development.
00:55:15.320 So a big part of it
00:55:16.280 is to keep these
00:55:17.200 startups who are
00:55:18.260 making new kinds of
00:55:19.060 batteries in business.
00:55:20.020 Because the current
00:55:21.040 batteries that they
00:55:22.320 use in cars, it
00:55:24.440 looks like the
00:55:25.140 total worldwide
00:55:26.120 supply of materials
00:55:27.720 to make them is
00:55:29.080 about this big, and
00:55:31.220 the number of
00:55:32.120 electric cars that we
00:55:33.180 think we want is
00:55:34.200 this big, and
00:55:35.640 they're not even
00:55:36.040 close.
00:55:37.540 So we're like maybe
00:55:39.140 1%, something like
00:55:41.940 that, probably 1%
00:55:43.240 to 3% of the
00:55:46.720 batteries that we'll
00:55:47.500 need to have a
00:55:49.080 world is, you
00:55:50.640 know, where the
00:55:51.800 power is always on
00:55:53.000 and you're not
00:55:53.780 burning coal,
00:55:55.060 basically.
00:55:56.500 But the good news
00:55:57.720 is this.
00:55:59.180 It seems to be
00:56:00.180 well-funded.
00:56:01.900 You know, the
00:56:02.200 government's billions
00:56:03.120 are going in that
00:56:04.100 direction.
00:56:04.960 But they also have
00:56:05.940 private funding.
00:56:07.400 And a number of
00:56:08.140 these technologies
00:56:08.840 look pretty good.
00:56:10.380 Look pretty good.
00:56:10.940 So a number of
00:56:12.140 technologies have
00:56:12.940 already gotten to
00:56:14.240 the point where
00:56:14.660 they've developed a
00:56:15.600 working battery.
00:56:17.360 And from working
00:56:18.300 battery to,
00:56:19.080 you know, being
00:56:20.520 able to scale up
00:56:21.420 to make lots of
00:56:22.160 them and sell them
00:56:22.860 and stuff is a lot
00:56:23.520 of work.
00:56:24.340 So the odds of
00:56:25.340 getting from a
00:56:25.980 working prototype
00:56:27.200 to a big industry
00:56:29.420 important company
00:56:30.720 is small.
00:56:32.720 Small.
00:56:33.760 Now, everybody
00:56:34.560 who's talking about
00:56:35.240 Solyndra, here's
00:56:37.260 the difference.
00:56:39.420 If you're going to
00:56:40.160 look at the stock
00:56:40.820 market in general,
00:56:41.720 let's say as an
00:56:42.200 investor, if you're
00:56:43.440 going to pick one
00:56:44.020 stock and put your
00:56:46.060 money in it, what
00:56:47.380 is that called?
00:56:49.020 Stupid.
00:56:50.200 Stupid.
00:56:52.160 Because diversification
00:56:53.420 is sort of the only
00:56:54.360 thing that works for
00:56:55.620 investing.
00:56:56.660 So if you put all
00:56:57.620 your money in, say,
00:56:58.660 a company, like Solyndra,
00:57:01.080 that is dumb by
00:57:02.560 definition.
00:57:03.840 But if you're the
00:57:05.040 infrastructure bill,
00:57:07.380 and you freed up
00:57:08.300 billions of dollars
00:57:09.160 for the industry of
00:57:11.440 batteries, so you're
00:57:12.800 giving it to a bunch
00:57:13.760 of different companies
00:57:14.500 and you don't know
00:57:15.300 which one's going to
00:57:15.920 work, that's good
00:57:17.660 management.
00:57:19.040 That's exactly what
00:57:19.920 you should do.
00:57:20.420 That's playing by the
00:57:21.480 numbers, basically.
00:57:23.260 So, yeah, everything
00:57:24.820 you say about Solyndra,
00:57:25.920 you just forget it.
00:57:27.440 Forget it.
00:57:28.900 You know, having the
00:57:29.560 government in the
00:57:30.780 industry get too
00:57:33.120 close is a bad idea.
00:57:34.540 But funding research
00:57:36.140 into new battery types,
00:57:37.620 that's what the
00:57:38.120 government's done well
00:57:38.980 before.
00:57:40.040 Our government has
00:57:41.280 spurred industries.
00:57:42.620 We know that
00:57:43.400 works.
00:57:53.540 Be transformed by
00:57:55.260 the renewing of
00:57:55.980 your mind, huh?
00:58:00.060 Yeah, we don't, it
00:58:01.580 would be good news if
00:58:02.600 we didn't think that
00:58:03.700 money would be wasted
00:58:04.600 by political people
00:58:06.140 trying to steal it.
00:58:08.800 That's true.
00:58:10.360 What about the
00:58:11.160 WEF? 0.65
00:58:12.900 Well, what about it?
00:58:14.020 Well, Dogbert's going
00:58:14.880 after ESG, so I'm
00:58:16.700 going to go after it
00:58:17.680 on a topic level.
00:58:22.160 I do think that who
00:58:25.220 gets to make the
00:58:26.100 decisions is what all
00:58:28.680 this WEF stuff's about,
00:58:30.300 right?
00:58:31.120 And the problem is
00:58:32.240 that the WEF takes
00:58:36.520 your control away from
00:58:37.880 you and gives it to
00:58:38.840 strangers.
00:58:44.640 How long does it
00:58:45.420 take me to finish
00:58:46.260 my coffee after the
00:58:47.320 show?
00:58:47.660 I usually get, I
00:58:48.900 usually throw away
00:58:49.700 whatever's been
00:58:50.280 sitting here for too
00:58:51.100 long.
00:58:52.960 So I have coffee
00:58:54.820 most of the day
00:58:55.740 until maybe four
00:58:57.580 o'clock.
00:59:01.560 All right.
00:59:03.280 Any other, your local
00:59:05.540 paper didn't print
00:59:06.760 your ESG?
00:59:07.980 Well, I've got some
00:59:09.000 more that are not
00:59:09.580 going to get printed
00:59:10.160 too.
00:59:10.980 So I did hear that
00:59:11.760 one paper's already
00:59:12.940 canceled me.
00:59:14.380 So I want you to
00:59:15.040 know this is expensive
00:59:15.980 for me.
00:59:17.560 You know, when I said
00:59:18.380 I'd go after ESG,
00:59:20.280 I knew it wouldn't be
00:59:22.460 cheap.
00:59:23.280 I mean, it could be,
00:59:24.440 it could put me out
00:59:25.100 of business easily.
00:59:26.480 We'll see.
00:59:29.400 Yeah, somebody says
00:59:30.480 the, was it the
00:59:31.920 St. Louis Post
00:59:32.640 Dispatch canceled
00:59:34.100 me, somebody said.
00:59:36.060 But find out if it
00:59:37.460 was just for the
00:59:38.160 week of the ESG.
00:59:40.080 Because if it comes
00:59:41.400 back, they may have
00:59:42.340 just taken it out.
00:59:43.440 Did they say they
00:59:44.120 canceled it?
00:59:49.480 Did they announce
00:59:50.440 it was canceled?
00:59:52.280 They downsized.
00:59:55.340 They may have just
00:59:56.560 pulled some comics.
00:59:57.920 I don't know.
00:59:58.120 But we'll, we'll
01:00:05.140 look into that.
01:00:10.500 Keep at it.
01:00:19.080 Zero strategies.
01:00:21.740 Censoring Scott.
01:00:22.740 All right.
01:00:28.840 I think we're done
01:00:29.680 here.
01:00:31.080 Are we?
01:00:31.940 I think we are.
01:00:33.020 All right, everybody.
01:00:34.800 I have heard of
01:00:35.580 Silva Biden
01:00:36.620 Control.
01:00:38.040 We'll talk about
01:00:38.760 that later.
01:00:39.560 Bye for now.