Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 20, 2022


Episode 1872 Scott Adams: My Plan For Decreasing Fentanyl Overdoses And Celebrating Our Victories


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 8 minutes

Words per Minute

144.22374

Word Count

9,870

Sentence Count

278

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Maroon 5 s Adam Levine named his fourth child after his mistress, and a friend of his wife found out about it. Plus, how to deal with an ex-boyfriend who wants to name his baby after you, his mistress.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to an amazing, amazing experience.
00:00:10.560 Today you're going to find out how to end the fentanyl crisis.
00:00:15.300 I'm going to tell you some amazing things that will blow your mind.
00:00:19.680 But first, how would you like to get in the right mood?
00:00:24.580 Would it take mushrooms?
00:00:26.760 No, no.
00:00:28.120 So all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tank or a chalice or a canteen jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind.
00:00:35.420 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:36.700 I like coffee.
00:00:38.080 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day.
00:00:41.160 The thing that makes everything better.
00:00:44.180 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:47.640 And it's famous all over America and it's happening now.
00:00:50.680 Famous all over the world, really.
00:00:52.480 Go.
00:00:52.700 Go.
00:00:52.760 Go.
00:01:00.840 Wow.
00:01:02.920 Wow.
00:01:04.640 I didn't know life could be this good.
00:01:08.160 Okay, it's wearing off now.
00:01:09.720 I guess it wasn't for a minute.
00:01:10.740 Well, I hope you all caught this important story.
00:01:17.160 This is maybe the most important thing.
00:01:20.600 Did you hear about Maroon 5 singer Adam Levine and his little personal problem?
00:01:29.200 Did you hear about that?
00:01:30.400 Now, I hate to feel, I hate to laugh at somebody's personal problems because I know you've had a good laugh at mine.
00:01:41.620 Have you not?
00:01:43.260 So I guess it's fair.
00:01:44.680 Fair is fair.
00:01:45.780 Now, it's not because it's a bad thing happening.
00:01:49.280 It's only the specifics of it that are funny.
00:01:51.720 So I don't wish bad things on anybody because it's actually a bad story.
00:01:56.420 It's a story about three people who are unhappy right now.
00:02:00.120 And it doesn't look like they're going to get any happier.
00:02:02.820 But here's what happened.
00:02:05.240 So Maroon 5 is married to this super beautiful, I think she was a model or an actress, whatever she was.
00:02:12.320 And they're having their third or fourth child.
00:02:16.980 Fourth.
00:02:18.500 So he's very married to a famously beautiful woman.
00:02:23.480 Victoria's Secret model, yeah.
00:02:25.540 A famously beautiful woman.
00:02:28.140 And having their fourth kid.
00:02:30.700 And he sent a text to his mistress, who is an Instagram model,
00:02:35.700 and asked the mistress if it would be okay with her if he named his fourth baby after his lover.
00:02:45.520 Her first name is Sumner.
00:02:50.540 That didn't go well.
00:02:52.760 Turns out that she shared that message with one of her friends.
00:03:00.000 I'm going to give you some advice right now.
00:03:02.980 Here's a little advice.
00:03:04.080 There's no such thing as sharing a secret about the Maroon 5 singer with your friend.
00:03:17.160 Yeah, because your friend's not going to mention that to anybody, right?
00:03:21.440 That's what friends are for.
00:03:23.620 No, there's no such thing as somebody who's not going to tell this story.
00:03:28.480 I mean, seriously.
00:03:29.700 You tell your best friend in confidence,
00:03:31.720 Look, my boyfriend, this famous singer guy,
00:03:36.220 wants to name his fourth baby after me, his mistress.
00:03:40.460 How do you not tell that story?
00:03:43.200 There's no way you don't tell that story.
00:03:45.840 So I guess one of his friends offered to sell the story to a tabloid.
00:03:49.700 That would be your first indication to reassess your friend group.
00:03:57.960 If you ever have a friend who wants to sell a screenshot of your private message
00:04:03.900 to ruin your life to a tabloid,
00:04:09.100 that's the definition of not a friend.
00:04:11.000 Not a friend at all.
00:04:11.920 Well, if you ever thought marriage was a good idea among beautiful people,
00:04:17.120 this should change your mind.
00:04:19.300 This is another reminder that the people who cheat are the ones who can.
00:04:25.460 And then they do.
00:04:26.180 My favorite Biden story.
00:04:31.080 So you all saw some clips of him being on 60 Minutes
00:04:33.880 and looking completely lost.
00:04:38.740 I think Biden only has,
00:04:40.560 he's got one eye that's half open
00:04:42.180 and one eye that's super squinty.
00:04:46.660 So his mouth is...
00:04:51.180 No, he's up.
00:04:53.260 This is his mouth.
00:04:53.800 This is his mouth.
00:04:56.620 Yeah.
00:04:58.960 So that part looks a little weird.
00:05:02.680 But here's the part that is the most,
00:05:06.000 I don't know,
00:05:07.340 interesting, I guess.
00:05:08.280 I was going to say fun,
00:05:09.180 but this doesn't sound fun.
00:05:12.600 Have I told you,
00:05:13.440 I think I have a few times,
00:05:14.620 that when I took hypnosis classes,
00:05:18.440 my hypnosis instructor taught me this trick
00:05:21.020 that I didn't think was real.
00:05:23.800 Like I, in my mind,
00:05:26.540 I was just debunking it.
00:05:27.680 It's like, that's not real.
00:05:28.860 That's just something you see,
00:05:30.560 you think it's real,
00:05:31.740 but that's not real.
00:05:33.080 And what he said was that people will tell you
00:05:35.460 exactly what their secret thoughts are
00:05:38.000 if you just listen to them.
00:05:40.800 Just listen to the words they choose
00:05:42.720 and their choice of words,
00:05:44.700 not the sentences.
00:05:45.580 The sentences might be misleading,
00:05:49.260 but sometimes within the sentences
00:05:50.820 there will be phrases or choices of words
00:05:53.780 that completely give away their inner thoughts,
00:05:56.780 sort of like a Freudian slip.
00:06:00.680 Now the first time I heard it,
00:06:01.920 I thought, that's not true.
00:06:04.360 Like people don't give away
00:06:05.680 their inner private thoughts that easily,
00:06:07.680 and then you start looking for it.
00:06:11.620 It's just, it's so often true.
00:06:14.600 Like I don't know if there's ever been
00:06:15.940 any science study of it,
00:06:17.860 but it sure looks true.
00:06:19.840 And here's one I spotted with Biden
00:06:21.340 that really jumped out.
00:06:22.920 When asked by 60 Minutes
00:06:26.100 if he were planning to run again,
00:06:29.180 he said it was his intention.
00:06:30.760 I'm going to paraphrase it a little bit.
00:06:31.980 He said it was his intention to run,
00:06:36.080 but that there are certain things
00:06:38.620 that get triggered
00:06:39.640 if you say for sure you're going to run.
00:06:42.760 So he was explaining
00:06:43.900 how the process works, right?
00:06:45.760 You might have an intention to run,
00:06:48.220 but the final decision
00:06:49.840 is what triggers a whole bunch of activity.
00:06:52.640 So until he wants to trigger the activity,
00:06:55.800 he's not going to make it official.
00:06:58.680 But the words he chose
00:07:00.280 to explain that very ordinary thing, right?
00:07:03.520 There was no news in that.
00:07:04.820 That's just an ordinary way people do stuff.
00:07:07.780 But the word he chose was
00:07:10.040 that it was his intention to run,
00:07:13.020 but it remains to be seen.
00:07:15.780 It remains to be seen.
00:07:18.800 Do you know what a hypnotist
00:07:19.900 would say about that?
00:07:21.420 He just announced his own death
00:07:23.180 because his remains will be seen.
00:07:27.520 Now, keep in mind,
00:07:29.560 this is in the context
00:07:30.520 of the queen's funeral
00:07:32.040 in which her remains
00:07:34.300 is an open casket.
00:07:37.720 Is the queen an open casket?
00:07:39.820 I don't know how that works.
00:07:41.740 But whether she's not an open casket,
00:07:44.240 that makes sense.
00:07:45.460 But still, her remains are there
00:07:47.340 to be seen, right?
00:07:49.500 They're in a box,
00:07:50.440 but remains to be seen.
00:07:52.020 Now, yeah, so you can't see her.
00:07:57.900 That makes sense.
00:07:58.780 I think we would have seen a picture
00:07:59.860 if you could see her.
00:08:03.900 So, now you're going to have
00:08:06.480 the same experience that I did,
00:08:08.440 which is you say,
00:08:09.800 Scott, that is quite a stretch.
00:08:12.900 Stretch.
00:08:15.200 You're saying that just because
00:08:16.540 he used a common phrase
00:08:18.780 remains to be seen
00:08:20.600 is a very common phrase, right?
00:08:22.980 Just because he used
00:08:24.000 a common phrase
00:08:25.120 and gave an ordinary answer
00:08:27.100 to an ordinary question
00:08:28.360 that he's announced his death.
00:08:32.460 Yes, that's what I'm saying.
00:08:35.060 Now, we'll see.
00:08:36.520 Now, this is not one of those
00:08:37.860 100% things, right?
00:08:39.820 You get that, right?
00:08:41.240 You can't predict it 100%.
00:08:43.080 But to me, this is a glaring signal
00:08:46.240 that he is contemplating
00:08:47.880 his own demise,
00:08:49.580 which suggests
00:08:51.020 the timer is already ticking,
00:08:54.040 which suggests
00:08:54.940 he may have some illness
00:08:56.540 that we don't know about yet.
00:08:59.480 That's what I think.
00:09:01.020 I believe he has
00:09:02.040 an undisclosed illness.
00:09:04.120 So I'm going to make
00:09:04.880 that prediction,
00:09:06.260 and the prediction
00:09:07.040 will be entirely based
00:09:08.660 on this one phrase
00:09:10.720 remains to be seen.
00:09:11.980 Anybody want to take
00:09:14.780 the other side of the bet?
00:09:17.100 Now, it's not based
00:09:17.960 on looking at him.
00:09:18.880 He does look, you know,
00:09:20.540 not, like, super healthy.
00:09:22.160 But that's more age.
00:09:24.020 And, of course, you know,
00:09:25.340 the odds are sort of
00:09:26.300 in my favor
00:09:26.880 because he's at a certain age
00:09:28.020 where everybody gets something.
00:09:31.860 Not too many people
00:09:33.160 want to bet against him, huh?
00:09:34.680 Now, even, I think,
00:09:35.880 I would bet against myself.
00:09:37.540 If I'm being honest.
00:09:39.140 If you said,
00:09:39.720 all right, now put money on it.
00:09:40.960 I would bet against myself.
00:09:43.760 But for fun,
00:09:44.960 because this is a good test
00:09:46.000 of the theory, right?
00:09:46.960 It's sort of an edge case.
00:09:48.680 If this one's true,
00:09:50.240 you're really going to believe
00:09:51.180 the next one, aren't you?
00:09:53.400 So that's all this is.
00:09:54.680 It's an experiment, right?
00:09:56.220 So this is an experiment
00:09:57.400 to see if my hypnotist instructor
00:10:00.300 was correct
00:10:02.140 that people say
00:10:03.120 exactly what they're thinking
00:10:04.280 if you just listen.
00:10:06.180 We'll see.
00:10:08.580 Again, I would bet against it.
00:10:10.040 I think the smart money says
00:10:12.000 he'll survive
00:10:13.960 at least until the re-election.
00:10:17.240 But it sure looks like
00:10:18.140 he says he's not.
00:10:21.140 Rasmussen did some polling
00:10:22.940 on how people are thinking
00:10:24.420 about Ukraine.
00:10:25.700 42% of U.S. likely voters
00:10:28.300 think that
00:10:28.880 the Russian invasion of Ukraine
00:10:31.060 has made America's
00:10:32.260 security situation worse.
00:10:34.040 18% think it made it better.
00:10:41.560 What do you think?
00:10:43.440 Does the Ukraine situation,
00:10:45.400 the entire situation there,
00:10:47.840 does it make America
00:10:48.960 less safe or more safe?
00:10:51.760 Secure?
00:10:52.960 What do you think?
00:10:53.660 Well,
00:10:56.220 here's one of those questions
00:10:58.160 where
00:10:58.740 what you're
00:11:03.180 actually answering
00:11:04.760 matters
00:11:05.360 because you will interpret
00:11:06.280 the question differently.
00:11:07.900 I would say
00:11:08.740 that the variability
00:11:09.700 is way up.
00:11:11.180 Wouldn't you?
00:11:12.560 The variability
00:11:13.500 of what could possibly happen
00:11:15.300 in the next year or two
00:11:16.360 is way up.
00:11:17.140 If you say
00:11:19.540 the variability,
00:11:20.720 in other words,
00:11:21.320 there are just more
00:11:21.840 variables in play,
00:11:23.400 there are bigger variables,
00:11:24.580 there are just more
00:11:25.060 swirling around.
00:11:27.340 Doesn't that always
00:11:28.180 make you less safe?
00:11:31.480 By definition.
00:11:33.400 But one of the possibilities
00:11:34.680 is,
00:11:35.180 since we can't predict
00:11:36.240 what's going to happen,
00:11:37.660 one of the possibilities
00:11:38.680 is it makes us more safe
00:11:40.080 by permanently
00:11:41.940 degrading Russia.
00:11:44.520 Or,
00:11:45.720 or,
00:11:47.140 the safest situation
00:11:48.940 would be a strong Russia
00:11:50.120 because you don't want
00:11:52.180 a weak country
00:11:53.040 with nuclear weapons.
00:11:55.140 Do you?
00:11:56.320 I mean,
00:11:57.080 that feels like
00:11:57.740 a really bad idea.
00:11:59.180 That's what happened
00:11:59.720 to Ukraine.
00:12:00.680 They were a weak country
00:12:01.520 with nuclear weapons.
00:12:03.160 Didn't work out.
00:12:05.180 So,
00:12:06.020 I don't know.
00:12:07.800 I'm not sure
00:12:08.360 if anybody can tell
00:12:09.480 if we got safer
00:12:10.500 or less safe
00:12:11.460 because it depends
00:12:12.720 what happens next
00:12:13.600 and nobody knows.
00:12:15.460 But I would like
00:12:16.340 to say this.
00:12:17.140 Because I've been
00:12:18.040 accused lately
00:12:18.820 of never saying
00:12:19.820 anything good
00:12:20.480 about Democrats.
00:12:24.520 If things go
00:12:25.540 the way they look
00:12:26.280 like they're going
00:12:26.820 to go now,
00:12:28.480 I think the Democrats,
00:12:30.840 and you'd have to
00:12:31.440 give Biden credit
00:12:32.300 because he's in charge,
00:12:33.800 allegedly,
00:12:35.220 it looks like
00:12:35.880 their strategy
00:12:36.460 in Ukraine
00:12:36.940 is working.
00:12:38.480 And I'm not sure
00:12:39.380 that anybody thought
00:12:40.080 that would be the case.
00:12:41.360 I mean,
00:12:42.760 even I said
00:12:43.480 that Ukraine
00:12:43.920 is going to put up
00:12:44.600 a better fight
00:12:45.260 than anybody imagined.
00:12:46.520 So I think
00:12:46.920 that was a good prediction.
00:12:48.680 But,
00:12:49.420 to me,
00:12:50.780 it looks like
00:12:51.240 the Biden administration
00:12:52.280 showed that
00:12:53.000 NATO
00:12:53.380 is not to be
00:12:54.820 fucked with.
00:12:56.340 What do you think?
00:12:58.980 And maybe that
00:12:59.800 helps us in the future.
00:13:01.040 That NATO just,
00:13:02.180 they're not going
00:13:02.740 to get pushed.
00:13:04.440 I don't know.
00:13:04.860 Maybe it helps.
00:13:06.260 I think there's
00:13:07.320 plenty of room
00:13:07.880 to disagree with this.
00:13:11.760 But,
00:13:12.540 do the shoe
00:13:15.100 and the other foot test,
00:13:16.240 the old,
00:13:17.360 this is the Dershowitz test.
00:13:20.420 If,
00:13:20.920 if Trump had done
00:13:22.580 everything that Biden
00:13:23.480 has done,
00:13:24.680 gave lots of weapons
00:13:25.800 to Ukraine,
00:13:26.720 fully supported him
00:13:27.800 against Russia,
00:13:29.380 and said,
00:13:30.140 you know,
00:13:30.320 you're not going
00:13:30.700 to take Ukraine,
00:13:31.520 we're going to make,
00:13:32.000 make sure it doesn't happen.
00:13:33.780 And then we got
00:13:34.260 to the place we are now,
00:13:35.560 where it looks like
00:13:36.340 Russia
00:13:36.740 won't take over Ukraine.
00:13:40.120 Do you think
00:13:40.680 I would be saying
00:13:41.360 it looked like a failure?
00:13:43.840 Seriously.
00:13:45.040 Don't you think
00:13:45.600 I would be praising Trump
00:13:46.920 for executing
00:13:48.840 a strategy
00:13:49.420 that was exactly
00:13:50.180 what he said
00:13:50.600 he was doing?
00:13:52.000 Now I might have,
00:13:52.880 now I might have
00:13:54.480 criticized him
00:13:55.580 for getting us
00:13:56.300 into the situation,
00:13:57.580 which might be different.
00:13:58.760 If he did,
00:13:59.420 I don't know if he did.
00:14:00.640 Maybe there was
00:14:01.300 nothing he did,
00:14:02.300 maybe he did,
00:14:02.920 I don't know,
00:14:03.420 don't know the details.
00:14:05.040 But,
00:14:05.300 yeah,
00:14:08.780 but let me ask you
00:14:10.180 just one question.
00:14:12.020 If Trump
00:14:12.880 had backed Ukraine,
00:14:14.220 and Ukraine
00:14:14.740 was clearly
00:14:15.600 seeming to do
00:14:16.360 really well,
00:14:17.580 wouldn't I say
00:14:18.300 that Trump
00:14:18.620 did a good job?
00:14:20.660 Wouldn't I?
00:14:21.680 I would.
00:14:22.980 So why wouldn't I
00:14:23.840 say that about Biden?
00:14:25.740 It's really tough
00:14:26.560 for you,
00:14:26.920 isn't it,
00:14:27.240 to hear anything
00:14:28.080 good about your
00:14:28.860 presumed
00:14:30.640 political nemesis.
00:14:32.240 but it's a good,
00:14:33.680 but it's a good
00:14:34.760 exercise.
00:14:37.120 It's a good exercise.
00:14:38.440 I'm going to compliment
00:14:39.160 another Democrat
00:14:40.180 in a little bit,
00:14:41.560 and I want to see
00:14:42.100 if he can hang with it.
00:14:45.420 But I think he can.
00:14:46.920 All right,
00:14:47.280 this is the smartest group.
00:14:49.220 I believe this is true,
00:14:50.280 by the way.
00:14:50.720 I think that
00:14:51.460 my live streams
00:14:52.660 are the smartest
00:14:53.540 observers of the news.
00:14:56.000 because you learn
00:14:57.740 to observe it
00:14:58.400 through a different
00:14:59.000 filter than other
00:14:59.820 people are observing it.
00:15:01.000 And I think that
00:15:01.440 just gives you
00:15:01.920 an extra sense,
00:15:03.860 basically.
00:15:05.480 All right.
00:15:07.420 So although
00:15:08.300 the Ukraine
00:15:09.060 situation,
00:15:10.540 you know,
00:15:11.340 may be part
00:15:12.060 of our spiraling
00:15:13.220 economic problems,
00:15:16.280 but it looks like
00:15:17.240 the strategy is working,
00:15:18.360 at least the military
00:15:19.020 strategy.
00:15:22.320 All right.
00:15:24.420 Speaking of a Democrat
00:15:25.520 who gets smart,
00:15:27.960 there's a guy running
00:15:29.820 for governor
00:15:30.560 in Pennsylvania
00:15:31.200 named Shapiro.
00:15:32.620 He's a Democrat,
00:15:33.760 and he attended
00:15:34.840 private schools.
00:15:36.760 And his children
00:15:37.800 attended private schools.
00:15:40.420 Have you seen
00:15:41.120 all of the tweets
00:15:43.200 by Corey DeAngelis
00:15:44.580 who outs every person
00:15:46.860 who says,
00:15:47.460 I don't want
00:15:47.880 school choice,
00:15:48.620 but then you find out
00:15:49.440 they had school choice?
00:15:51.940 They actually went
00:15:52.740 to an alternative school.
00:15:54.500 It's a lot of
00:15:55.500 politicians
00:15:56.040 who are in that boat,
00:15:57.000 Democrats.
00:15:57.920 Democrats who went
00:15:58.840 to private schools
00:15:59.780 and say,
00:16:01.020 no, people shouldn't
00:16:01.880 have that choice.
00:16:03.860 Or they shouldn't
00:16:04.660 have more choice.
00:16:05.780 You know,
00:16:05.960 not that choice,
00:16:06.740 but they shouldn't
00:16:07.200 have more choice.
00:16:09.160 And so,
00:16:09.860 and of course,
00:16:11.320 that's,
00:16:12.160 the polls show
00:16:13.060 that that's pretty much
00:16:13.860 a death sentence
00:16:14.640 to be against
00:16:16.640 school choice
00:16:17.440 at the moment.
00:16:19.200 So Shapiro,
00:16:20.000 he's a regular Democrat.
00:16:21.660 He runs for office,
00:16:22.980 and he puts parents
00:16:24.420 above teachers' unions.
00:16:27.460 Like,
00:16:28.200 explicitly,
00:16:29.140 puts parents
00:16:30.400 above teachers' unions.
00:16:31.780 And he is in favor
00:16:33.140 of school choice.
00:16:34.740 Now,
00:16:34.860 he's a Democrat.
00:16:37.360 How does that not work?
00:16:40.040 How does that not
00:16:41.320 win him the election?
00:16:43.120 Seriously.
00:16:44.360 You know,
00:16:44.820 the thing that makes me nuts
00:16:47.200 is we see all these
00:16:48.800 allegedly highly capable
00:16:50.580 people running
00:16:51.380 for office.
00:16:52.440 And they do have
00:16:53.280 good credentials.
00:16:55.160 You know,
00:16:55.320 a lot of them are
00:16:55.920 from the best schools
00:16:57.340 and lots of experience
00:16:58.560 and stuff.
00:16:59.440 And then they get
00:17:00.220 into these high offices
00:17:01.280 and they can't do
00:17:02.860 the simplest stuff
00:17:04.680 to please the public.
00:17:06.980 And none of it's hard.
00:17:08.640 It's not hard.
00:17:10.000 How hard was it
00:17:10.940 for a Democrat
00:17:11.820 to say,
00:17:12.300 you know what?
00:17:13.680 Well,
00:17:14.060 because of fundraising,
00:17:14.940 right?
00:17:15.480 But you know what?
00:17:16.700 I think parents are
00:17:17.780 maybe higher priority
00:17:19.220 than the teachers' unions.
00:17:21.440 Then the teachers' unions
00:17:22.640 will, you know,
00:17:23.340 try to fundraise
00:17:24.400 against him,
00:17:24.980 right?
00:17:26.000 No,
00:17:26.300 they won't.
00:17:28.180 The teachers' unions
00:17:29.000 are not going to
00:17:30.160 fundraise for a Republican
00:17:31.700 against a Democrat.
00:17:33.720 It's a free shot.
00:17:35.920 It was a free pass.
00:17:37.400 Now,
00:17:37.620 if he had enough money
00:17:38.780 so he didn't need
00:17:40.160 any extra money
00:17:41.000 from any teacher union
00:17:42.320 and stuff,
00:17:43.640 then he's fine.
00:17:46.500 He's fine.
00:17:48.380 Now,
00:17:49.000 I say the same thing
00:17:50.100 about Republicans.
00:17:51.200 It would be so easy
00:17:52.600 for a Republican
00:17:53.660 to talk about,
00:17:54.560 let's say,
00:17:54.960 immigration
00:17:55.440 in a way
00:17:56.660 that didn't sound racist.
00:17:58.720 Super easy.
00:18:00.160 But they can't do it.
00:18:02.100 Now,
00:18:02.600 I don't think
00:18:03.280 that Republicans
00:18:04.280 are doing
00:18:05.740 their immigration
00:18:06.400 border policy
00:18:07.260 because they're racists.
00:18:08.960 I don't believe that.
00:18:10.820 I think they're doing it
00:18:11.580 for all the reasons
00:18:13.180 they say.
00:18:14.140 But when they talk
00:18:15.160 about it,
00:18:15.600 they do sound racist
00:18:16.520 quite often.
00:18:17.700 And I think
00:18:18.180 they're not.
00:18:19.120 But I look at their
00:18:20.160 language and I'm thinking,
00:18:21.400 seriously,
00:18:22.020 you couldn't do
00:18:22.500 better than that?
00:18:23.480 When you know
00:18:24.460 you're going to get
00:18:25.120 accused of racism
00:18:26.140 and you can't do
00:18:27.420 better than that,
00:18:28.880 there's nothing
00:18:29.560 you can say
00:18:30.160 that would take
00:18:30.800 that stink off you?
00:18:32.240 Of course you could.
00:18:34.860 It wouldn't be hard.
00:18:36.620 Watch me do it.
00:18:38.320 Watch me do it right now.
00:18:40.760 Here's my view
00:18:41.540 on immigration.
00:18:43.180 We should separate
00:18:44.020 the question
00:18:44.560 of our ability
00:18:45.980 to control immigration
00:18:47.200 from the question
00:18:48.580 of who we let in.
00:18:50.200 We keep conflating them
00:18:51.380 like our policy
00:18:52.520 is to be haphazard.
00:18:54.840 That's not a policy.
00:18:56.440 We should have
00:18:56.980 total control
00:18:57.700 over who gets in
00:18:58.560 and then we should
00:18:59.680 use our empathy
00:19:00.520 and our awesomeness
00:19:01.600 and our economic strength
00:19:03.840 and our economic wisdom
00:19:05.540 to decide who gets in
00:19:07.260 and under what conditions
00:19:08.360 and then we dial up
00:19:10.100 the border
00:19:10.640 to let in that many people
00:19:12.120 under those conditions.
00:19:13.760 But you let the decision
00:19:14.860 of who comes in
00:19:15.640 be made by economists.
00:19:18.600 Bipartisan, ideally.
00:19:20.160 You want some
00:19:20.680 bipartisan economists
00:19:21.780 to say,
00:19:22.780 you know,
00:19:23.200 we need more people.
00:19:24.900 You better let them in.
00:19:26.440 Dial it up.
00:19:27.580 No, things are bad.
00:19:29.280 If you let more people in,
00:19:30.440 it'll be bad
00:19:30.960 for the United States
00:19:31.860 even though it's good
00:19:33.040 for the immigrants.
00:19:34.300 But how bad?
00:19:35.360 Well, just a little bit bad.
00:19:37.960 A little bit bad?
00:19:39.400 But we are helping
00:19:40.700 all these people
00:19:41.380 and, you know,
00:19:42.320 they'll become good citizens.
00:19:43.940 Okay, we'll still let them in.
00:19:45.720 We know it's a little bit bad.
00:19:47.420 We know it's a little bit bad,
00:19:48.640 but we're also
00:19:49.160 a big, generous country.
00:19:51.300 So a little bit bad,
00:19:52.280 we'll live with that, right?
00:19:54.460 But what if the economists
00:19:55.440 say it's real bad?
00:19:57.020 Well, then we'll turn it down.
00:19:58.020 Now,
00:20:00.360 that was a totally
00:20:02.520 Republican point of view,
00:20:04.720 was it not?
00:20:06.000 Was that not 100%
00:20:07.980 Republican point of view?
00:20:09.980 It was.
00:20:11.440 Did I not completely
00:20:13.240 free myself
00:20:15.320 from accusations
00:20:16.200 of racism?
00:20:18.200 Completely.
00:20:19.400 There's nothing there
00:20:20.340 you can chew on.
00:20:21.700 Nothing.
00:20:22.660 Because I said
00:20:23.200 a bipartisan commission
00:20:24.440 will decide who gets it.
00:20:25.900 Done.
00:20:26.240 They'll just look at economics
00:20:28.240 instead of other stuff.
00:20:30.520 Right?
00:20:30.860 I even allowed
00:20:31.940 that we would
00:20:32.760 take some pain
00:20:34.360 to let in our neighbors
00:20:36.000 from the South
00:20:36.680 who need some help.
00:20:38.920 A little bit of pain.
00:20:40.820 Right?
00:20:41.600 There's no Republican
00:20:42.620 who wouldn't take
00:20:43.300 a little bit of pain
00:20:44.180 to help somebody out.
00:20:45.820 That's who you are.
00:20:47.520 Why not have a candidate
00:20:48.500 who represents
00:20:49.180 who you are?
00:20:50.280 Yeah, you take a little bit
00:20:51.180 of pain to help somebody out.
00:20:52.460 Absolutely.
00:20:53.580 You would help
00:20:54.560 your neighbor
00:20:55.000 and mow the lawn
00:20:55.700 if the neighbor
00:20:56.340 got sick.
00:20:57.520 Couldn't mow the lawn?
00:20:58.320 You'd mow the lawn.
00:20:59.760 You would shovel
00:21:01.520 your neighbor's snow
00:21:02.880 out of their driveway
00:21:03.780 if you knew
00:21:04.860 they couldn't do it.
00:21:06.820 Right?
00:21:07.220 That's what you do.
00:21:08.620 So a little bit
00:21:09.340 of pain, sure.
00:21:11.000 But too much pain
00:21:12.200 is just giving away
00:21:13.100 stuff you worked for.
00:21:14.760 You didn't sign up
00:21:15.660 for that.
00:21:16.080 So, so easy
00:21:20.100 to tell a Republican story
00:21:23.480 that everybody would buy.
00:21:25.340 So easy.
00:21:26.460 And what does Trump say?
00:21:28.640 Trump says over and over again
00:21:30.520 they're not sending their best.
00:21:34.360 I assume he's trying
00:21:35.580 to make it sound racist
00:21:36.560 at this point.
00:21:38.460 I mean, I can't believe
00:21:39.780 that he doesn't know
00:21:41.000 what that sounds like
00:21:41.940 at this point.
00:21:43.160 Maybe the first time
00:21:44.060 he said it
00:21:44.480 he was just being provocative.
00:21:46.080 But at this point
00:21:47.180 he still says it.
00:21:50.200 He still says it.
00:21:53.100 What's up with that?
00:21:55.960 All right.
00:21:57.540 You can use your own judgment
00:21:58.880 for what's up with that.
00:22:02.420 I was looking at a list
00:22:03.660 of the audiences
00:22:04.800 for the biggest network shows
00:22:07.160 and I didn't realize
00:22:08.920 that The Five
00:22:11.400 just destroys other shows.
00:22:13.720 I didn't realize
00:22:14.280 on Fox News
00:22:15.320 that show
00:22:16.660 that show has just
00:22:16.920 become like a powerhouse
00:22:18.220 and
00:22:19.920 so now
00:22:21.520 Greg Gutfeld
00:22:22.440 has, you know,
00:22:23.280 that show
00:22:23.760 plus Gutfeld
00:22:24.640 that's absolutely
00:22:25.820 ruling
00:22:26.440 the evenings.
00:22:28.280 Did any of you
00:22:28.960 have on your prediction card
00:22:31.040 Greg Gutfeld
00:22:32.460 runs most of the world?
00:22:35.260 Did you see that coming?
00:22:36.240 because I don't think
00:22:41.060 I don't think you understand
00:22:41.680 how important it is
00:22:43.260 when certain personalities
00:22:45.680 become prominent
00:22:46.840 at Fox News
00:22:48.200 because Fox News
00:22:49.740 sort of shapes
00:22:51.460 the biggest
00:22:53.020 single group
00:22:54.880 in the public
00:22:55.640 shapes their opinions.
00:22:58.320 so, yeah, I mean
00:23:00.660 he's not the only
00:23:01.600 person on The Five
00:23:02.520 obviously.
00:23:03.500 So Dana Perino
00:23:05.100 now has
00:23:05.660 she's on The Five
00:23:07.120 and also her
00:23:07.980 other show
00:23:09.180 is also in the top
00:23:11.260 five I think.
00:23:12.440 Like she's killing it.
00:23:13.980 Yeah, Dana Perino
00:23:14.720 is just killing it.
00:23:16.300 And Jessie's
00:23:16.820 oh yeah, Jessie, right?
00:23:17.960 Jessie's got two
00:23:18.740 top rated shows
00:23:20.060 as well.
00:23:20.460 So the three of them
00:23:22.440 from The Five
00:23:23.160 pretty much
00:23:25.540 are just
00:23:26.900 the most influential
00:23:27.860 people around right now.
00:23:29.120 Now of course
00:23:29.480 Tucker and
00:23:30.320 Hannity
00:23:31.920 will always be
00:23:33.440 you know
00:23:34.040 singularly
00:23:35.060 special.
00:23:37.880 But it's interesting
00:23:38.880 to watch
00:23:39.320 to see how
00:23:39.800 that's going to shape up
00:23:40.880 especially as the next
00:23:41.840 presidential election
00:23:43.400 comes at us.
00:23:45.700 So I saw
00:23:46.460 an article in Vice
00:23:47.640 that
00:23:49.280 this Twitter
00:23:51.220 whistleblower
00:23:51.920 alleges that
00:23:53.580 a Chinese spy
00:23:54.860 works at Twitter
00:23:56.060 and maybe
00:23:57.200 I think there was
00:23:58.080 at least a Saudi
00:23:58.880 Arabian
00:23:59.460 employee
00:24:00.640 spy
00:24:01.340 that was caught
00:24:02.220 at a different time.
00:24:03.980 But
00:24:04.180 when he brought
00:24:05.380 that information
00:24:06.040 to senior management
00:24:07.240 allegedly
00:24:07.820 and by the way
00:24:09.140 this doesn't sound
00:24:09.960 true to me.
00:24:11.840 So here's a story
00:24:12.760 of you know
00:24:14.180 a story
00:24:14.680 you weren't there
00:24:15.500 it's not anonymous
00:24:17.760 but you weren't there
00:24:19.040 and allegedly
00:24:21.160 when the whistleblower
00:24:22.820 brought that information
00:24:23.980 that he believed
00:24:24.780 there was a Chinese agent
00:24:25.940 on the payroll
00:24:26.520 that the unidentified
00:24:28.880 executive said
00:24:31.100 well you know
00:24:31.740 if there's
00:24:32.100 one on the payroll
00:24:33.420 what does it hurt
00:24:35.680 to have another one
00:24:36.360 on the payroll
00:24:36.900 so let's grow our staff.
00:24:39.880 I feel like
00:24:40.500 maybe there was
00:24:41.000 some context
00:24:41.660 missing there
00:24:42.280 right?
00:24:42.500 I don't think
00:24:45.620 I don't think
00:24:46.080 an executive
00:24:46.520 said that
00:24:47.140 I don't think so
00:24:48.720 that's not something
00:24:50.260 that comes out
00:24:50.800 of anybody's mouth
00:24:52.260 something like it
00:24:53.860 might have been said
00:24:54.500 I can certainly
00:24:56.140 believe there's
00:24:56.700 something unsatisfying
00:24:58.180 or
00:24:58.480 you know
00:24:59.580 you know
00:25:01.060 maybe
00:25:01.400 suboptimal
00:25:03.020 came out of his voice
00:25:04.240 I don't think
00:25:04.820 he said exactly that
00:25:05.940 but we'll see
00:25:07.560 now who was it
00:25:11.760 who told you
00:25:12.920 probably
00:25:15.500 five years ago
00:25:17.140 that I thought
00:25:18.600 that some of the
00:25:19.700 things you were seeing
00:25:20.580 in terms of the
00:25:21.780 algorithm
00:25:22.300 looked like they
00:25:23.240 might have been
00:25:23.780 influenced by
00:25:24.580 foreign countries
00:25:26.220 who was the
00:25:27.760 first person
00:25:28.260 who told you
00:25:28.720 that Twitter
00:25:29.280 was definitely
00:25:30.120 controlled by
00:25:33.400 foreign entities
00:25:34.320 by now
00:25:34.980 if not the CIA
00:25:36.580 right
00:25:39.000 and
00:25:39.980 do you remember
00:25:40.660 the reasoning
00:25:41.260 for why it
00:25:42.640 had to be true
00:25:43.420 there's a reasoning
00:25:45.260 for why it had
00:25:46.040 to be true
00:25:46.540 without any evidence
00:25:47.700 with no clues
00:25:49.420 no evidence
00:25:50.000 no whistleblowers
00:25:50.940 why did it have
00:25:52.080 to be true
00:25:52.620 it's the same
00:25:55.120 reason
00:25:55.500 it's the same
00:25:57.640 reason that
00:25:58.500 insider trading
00:25:59.780 exists
00:26:00.380 it has to exist
00:26:02.060 it's a
00:26:05.280 it's a huge
00:26:05.960 payoff
00:26:06.480 there's no
00:26:08.280 real penalty
00:26:08.920 if you get
00:26:09.820 caught
00:26:10.200 right
00:26:11.200 because China
00:26:12.320 doesn't care
00:26:12.920 if they
00:26:13.260 catch and
00:26:14.520 fire one
00:26:15.120 of their
00:26:15.300 agents
00:26:15.740 huge payoff
00:26:17.620 not much
00:26:18.860 downside
00:26:19.260 if you get
00:26:19.700 caught
00:26:20.020 lots of
00:26:21.180 time
00:26:21.560 and lots
00:26:22.940 of people
00:26:23.520 involved
00:26:24.140 who would
00:26:24.780 have an
00:26:25.100 interest
00:26:25.440 if you have
00:26:26.660 all of those
00:26:27.300 things
00:26:27.660 it happens
00:26:28.140 every time
00:26:28.700 lots of
00:26:30.100 time
00:26:30.520 lots of
00:26:31.660 people who
00:26:32.180 are interested
00:26:32.720 it's really
00:26:34.060 important
00:26:34.520 if you
00:26:34.920 could pull
00:26:35.840 it off
00:26:36.240 and there's
00:26:36.900 not much
00:26:37.220 downside
00:26:37.680 not much
00:26:39.280 downside
00:26:39.640 at all
00:26:40.040 under those
00:26:41.740 conditions
00:26:42.240 the predictable
00:26:43.980 thing happens
00:26:44.620 every time
00:26:45.220 it's not
00:26:46.780 sometimes
00:26:47.420 it's every
00:26:48.480 time
00:26:48.960 right
00:26:50.040 now I've
00:26:51.740 said that
00:26:52.100 about our
00:26:52.460 election
00:26:52.780 systems
00:26:53.380 which doesn't
00:26:55.860 mean that
00:26:56.540 they are
00:26:56.880 corrupt
00:26:57.280 and it
00:26:58.020 doesn't mean
00:26:58.560 that anything
00:26:58.960 was wrong
00:26:59.520 with the
00:26:59.880 last election
00:27:00.580 what it
00:27:01.660 does mean
00:27:02.200 is that
00:27:03.360 there's a
00:27:03.720 hundred percent
00:27:04.240 chance
00:27:04.700 it will
00:27:05.340 happen
00:27:05.700 if it
00:27:06.740 hasn't
00:27:07.020 already
00:27:07.340 in other
00:27:08.700 words
00:27:09.020 corrupting
00:27:10.140 our election
00:27:10.660 systems
00:27:11.140 whether you're
00:27:11.680 a foreign
00:27:12.040 entity
00:27:12.380 or an
00:27:13.800 interested
00:27:14.160 party
00:27:14.620 in the
00:27:15.080 United
00:27:15.260 States
00:27:15.660 lots of
00:27:17.400 people
00:27:17.620 involved
00:27:18.140 there's
00:27:19.220 lots of
00:27:19.580 time
00:27:20.140 to get
00:27:20.500 things
00:27:20.780 done
00:27:21.060 the
00:27:22.220 penalty
00:27:22.560 for
00:27:22.860 getting
00:27:23.100 caught
00:27:23.540 would
00:27:24.940 seem
00:27:25.220 to some
00:27:25.680 people
00:27:26.020 low
00:27:26.380 enough
00:27:26.780 right
00:27:27.560 there's
00:27:27.900 some
00:27:28.040 people
00:27:28.260 who say
00:27:28.500 I'm not
00:27:28.780 going to
00:27:28.940 do that
00:27:29.300 but there
00:27:29.940 are plenty
00:27:30.380 of people
00:27:30.760 who do
00:27:31.100 crimes
00:27:31.640 and fraud
00:27:32.500 especially
00:27:32.900 white
00:27:33.200 color
00:27:33.380 crimes
00:27:33.760 you can
00:27:34.460 find
00:27:34.660 plenty
00:27:34.980 of people
00:27:35.320 who are
00:27:35.520 willing
00:27:35.740 to do
00:27:36.040 that
00:27:36.320 so you
00:27:37.160 have
00:27:37.300 plenty
00:27:37.660 of
00:27:37.820 people
00:27:38.100 lots
00:27:39.040 of
00:27:39.180 time
00:27:39.700 huge
00:27:40.820 payoff
00:27:41.200 if you
00:27:41.640 can pull
00:27:41.960 it off
00:27:42.380 because you
00:27:42.760 can control
00:27:43.320 the election
00:27:43.740 outcome
00:27:44.180 that's
00:27:46.040 all you
00:27:46.260 need
00:27:46.480 it'll
00:27:48.040 happen
00:27:48.320 100%
00:27:48.880 of the
00:27:49.080 time
00:27:49.340 now
00:27:50.880 does that
00:27:51.220 mean
00:27:51.380 that somebody
00:27:51.780 has a
00:27:52.120 way
00:27:52.280 they can
00:27:52.700 cheat
00:27:53.240 from the
00:27:53.580 outside
00:27:53.960 I don't
00:27:54.660 know
00:27:54.840 I have
00:27:55.740 no idea
00:27:56.180 but if you
00:27:57.400 put somebody
00:27:57.940 on the
00:27:58.320 inside
00:27:58.860 and they're
00:28:00.300 part of the
00:28:00.780 process
00:28:01.260 they're writing
00:28:01.760 the software
00:28:02.340 they're designing
00:28:03.020 the hardware
00:28:03.560 there's some
00:28:05.180 stuff they
00:28:05.640 can do
00:28:06.100 so yeah
00:28:09.740 so now
00:28:11.340 we've
00:28:12.180 now found
00:28:12.800 spies
00:28:13.380 at the
00:28:14.000 following
00:28:14.340 places
00:28:14.900 twitter
00:28:16.680 feinstein's
00:28:18.060 car
00:28:18.400 and
00:28:19.400 swalwell's
00:28:20.180 bed
00:28:20.480 what do
00:28:22.480 those three
00:28:22.880 things have
00:28:23.320 in common
00:28:23.780 democrats
00:28:26.680 democrats
00:28:29.100 have any
00:28:31.020 republicans
00:28:31.720 been
00:28:31.900 penetrated
00:28:32.480 either
00:28:34.080 republican
00:28:34.720 run
00:28:35.460 companies
00:28:36.140 or
00:28:37.320 republican
00:28:38.280 politicians
00:28:39.300 i don't
00:28:42.040 know
00:28:42.280 yeah
00:28:44.100 feinstein's
00:28:44.960 driver was
00:28:45.540 a chinese
00:28:45.940 spy
00:28:46.240 that's the
00:28:47.880 perfect job
00:28:48.520 for a chinese
00:28:49.020 spy
00:28:49.320 isn't it
00:28:49.740 driver
00:28:50.120 because they
00:28:50.540 hear everything
00:28:51.100 all right
00:28:53.360 um
00:28:54.380 peter
00:28:55.780 zan
00:28:56.380 has been
00:28:58.040 talking for a
00:28:58.960 long time
00:28:59.280 about the
00:28:59.820 coming
00:29:00.280 decoupling
00:29:00.840 from china
00:29:01.420 now there
00:29:02.400 are people
00:29:02.660 have different
00:29:03.080 agreement
00:29:03.460 different opinions
00:29:04.320 on this
00:29:04.680 right
00:29:04.880 so the
00:29:06.080 the opposite
00:29:07.380 opinion
00:29:07.800 is that
00:29:08.880 we'll never
00:29:09.500 get all of our
00:29:10.340 manufacturing
00:29:10.920 out of china
00:29:11.400 that's just a
00:29:12.140 pipe dream
00:29:12.580 but
00:29:14.380 peter zan
00:29:15.360 points out
00:29:16.040 that we've
00:29:16.800 already
00:29:17.140 you know
00:29:18.320 that the
00:29:18.760 trade war
00:29:19.420 is sort of
00:29:20.560 this low
00:29:22.300 grade but
00:29:23.040 escalating
00:29:23.660 situation
00:29:24.260 that's a
00:29:24.800 little bit
00:29:25.100 below our
00:29:25.740 notice at
00:29:26.880 the moment
00:29:27.320 but something
00:29:28.240 really big
00:29:28.740 happened
00:29:29.100 apparently
00:29:29.940 we are
00:29:30.500 preventing
00:29:31.000 advanced
00:29:31.860 chip
00:29:32.360 manufacturing
00:29:33.720 components
00:29:34.580 and
00:29:35.140 equipment
00:29:36.080 from going
00:29:36.640 to china
00:29:37.080 so china
00:29:38.800 according to
00:29:39.580 peter zan
00:29:40.020 doesn't have
00:29:40.560 the ability
00:29:41.120 to manufacture
00:29:42.140 its own
00:29:42.580 advanced chips
00:29:43.440 and doesn't
00:29:44.380 look like
00:29:44.740 they would
00:29:45.040 have it
00:29:45.320 anytime soon
00:29:45.980 so
00:29:47.680 so we'll
00:29:49.400 you know
00:29:49.700 of course
00:29:50.000 china will
00:29:50.600 fight back
00:29:51.620 with their
00:29:52.000 rare earth
00:29:52.460 minerals
00:29:52.840 and everything
00:29:53.260 else
00:29:53.580 at the same
00:29:54.440 time we're
00:29:54.860 developing
00:29:55.280 batteries that
00:29:55.960 don't need
00:29:56.420 them
00:29:56.660 so i think
00:29:57.780 you know
00:29:58.300 they'll be
00:29:59.060 but they want
00:30:00.700 to sell them
00:30:01.240 because they
00:30:02.020 make profit
00:30:02.560 so it's
00:30:04.060 going to be
00:30:04.320 this weird
00:30:04.920 fight dance
00:30:06.320 it's like a
00:30:07.060 dance fight
00:30:07.600 but i guess
00:30:08.580 there's some
00:30:09.180 you know
00:30:09.780 disagreements
00:30:10.440 about air
00:30:11.300 frames
00:30:11.780 so it's
00:30:12.620 now aircraft
00:30:13.460 advanced
00:30:13.940 anything with
00:30:14.440 a chip
00:30:14.840 is not
00:30:15.680 going to
00:30:15.860 be traded
00:30:16.420 and
00:30:18.080 do you
00:30:20.480 remember
00:30:20.840 about
00:30:21.420 well
00:30:24.400 it actually
00:30:24.800 peter zan
00:30:25.300 says that
00:30:25.780 in one
00:30:26.080 to three
00:30:26.420 years
00:30:26.820 if you
00:30:27.700 don't get
00:30:28.080 your company's
00:30:28.920 business
00:30:29.240 out of
00:30:29.560 china
00:30:29.780 you're
00:30:30.060 going to
00:30:30.240 regret it
00:30:30.800 basically
00:30:31.840 he thinks
00:30:32.380 that you
00:30:32.760 won't be
00:30:33.060 able to
00:30:33.280 do business
00:30:33.760 in china
00:30:34.240 in one
00:30:35.420 to three
00:30:35.720 years
00:30:36.020 that there
00:30:36.600 will be
00:30:36.760 a complete
00:30:37.180 collapse
00:30:37.800 of any
00:30:39.080 at least
00:30:40.200 american
00:30:40.620 company
00:30:41.080 that's in
00:30:41.960 china
00:30:42.240 they just
00:30:42.920 won't be
00:30:43.260 able to
00:30:43.480 operate
00:30:43.740 there
00:30:43.940 anymore
00:30:44.480 and
00:30:45.860 how many
00:30:49.280 of you
00:30:49.520 remember
00:30:49.940 that about
00:30:51.700 probably the
00:30:53.580 end of
00:30:53.940 2018
00:30:54.440 when my
00:30:56.600 stepson
00:30:57.080 died of
00:30:57.540 fentanyl
00:30:58.200 overdose
00:30:58.520 how many
00:30:59.800 of you
00:31:00.020 remember
00:31:00.240 i vowed
00:31:01.100 to bring
00:31:02.640 down
00:31:02.940 china
00:31:03.320 and cause
00:31:04.780 the united
00:31:05.120 states to
00:31:05.640 decouple
00:31:06.240 their economy
00:31:06.920 do you
00:31:07.980 remember
00:31:08.200 that
00:31:08.500 what did
00:31:09.920 you think
00:31:10.240 about it
00:31:10.560 at the
00:31:10.780 time
00:31:11.060 in 2018
00:31:12.660 when i
00:31:13.160 said i
00:31:13.480 was going
00:31:13.700 to crash
00:31:14.240 china
00:31:14.700 and decouple
00:31:15.580 our economy
00:31:16.360 from them
00:31:16.700 what did
00:31:17.000 you say
00:31:17.380 crazy
00:31:19.460 crazy
00:31:20.660 right
00:31:21.020 totally
00:31:22.400 crazy
00:31:22.780 now
00:31:23.660 coincidentally
00:31:24.740 and maybe
00:31:26.180 because of
00:31:27.240 the pandemic
00:31:27.820 maybe some
00:31:28.720 other coincidences
00:31:29.460 but coincidentally
00:31:30.680 it's happening
00:31:31.180 so pretty
00:31:33.400 lucky huh
00:31:34.000 pretty lucky
00:31:34.880 prediction
00:31:35.480 isn't it
00:31:39.100 amazing how
00:31:39.600 lucky i
00:31:40.040 get
00:31:40.300 remember when
00:31:41.660 i predicted
00:31:42.440 that trump
00:31:43.080 would be
00:31:43.380 president in
00:31:43.960 2016
00:31:44.460 got pretty
00:31:45.800 lucky on
00:31:46.280 that one
00:31:47.000 remember
00:31:49.540 when
00:31:49.880 i advocated
00:31:51.320 for closing
00:31:52.000 travel to
00:31:52.900 china
00:31:53.240 when the
00:31:54.480 pandemic
00:31:54.880 broke out
00:31:55.420 what did
00:31:57.400 you think
00:31:57.740 when i said
00:31:58.120 close travel
00:31:59.020 to china
00:31:59.540 well that's
00:32:00.560 not going
00:32:00.840 to happen
00:32:01.160 but then
00:32:02.560 by coincidence
00:32:03.200 and by luck
00:32:03.880 it did
00:32:04.240 just by luck
00:32:05.260 got pretty
00:32:07.860 pretty lucky
00:32:08.360 there
00:32:08.640 so i got
00:32:11.140 lucky again
00:32:11.780 it seems
00:32:12.200 that
00:32:12.540 that this
00:32:14.560 decoupling
00:32:15.060 is happening
00:32:15.580 with complete
00:32:16.560 coincidence
00:32:16.980 and had
00:32:17.540 nothing to do
00:32:18.080 with me
00:32:18.380 whatsoever
00:32:19.000 let's talk
00:32:20.700 about fentanyl
00:32:21.480 have i
00:32:25.500 mentioned
00:32:25.820 that i'm
00:32:26.420 going to
00:32:26.640 punish
00:32:26.980 china for
00:32:27.780 fentanyl
00:32:28.740 and i'm
00:32:31.700 surprised it
00:32:32.200 hasn't
00:32:32.440 happened
00:32:32.680 already
00:32:33.080 but the
00:32:35.540 decoupling
00:32:36.040 should be
00:32:36.700 you know
00:32:37.020 plenty good
00:32:37.620 for punishing
00:32:38.280 china
00:32:38.760 they'll be
00:32:39.400 left with
00:32:39.840 their aging
00:32:40.260 population
00:32:40.880 and they
00:32:42.000 got troubles
00:32:42.540 but here's
00:32:44.620 what i would
00:32:45.080 suggest
00:32:45.500 i read the
00:32:46.200 the republican
00:32:47.560 plan
00:32:48.120 so there
00:32:48.820 is a
00:32:49.120 republican
00:32:49.540 maybe
00:32:50.900 strategy
00:32:51.500 or plan
00:32:52.060 for dealing
00:32:52.580 with it
00:32:52.960 here's
00:32:53.900 the weak
00:32:54.600 republican
00:32:55.240 plan
00:32:55.760 totally
00:32:56.600 totally
00:32:57.740 toothless
00:32:58.240 increase the
00:33:00.260 penalties for
00:33:01.100 dealers
00:33:01.480 which might
00:33:02.560 include life
00:33:03.240 or life
00:33:04.040 imprisonment
00:33:04.520 or death
00:33:04.900 but these
00:33:06.600 are american
00:33:07.200 dealers
00:33:07.700 right
00:33:09.020 so the
00:33:10.940 republicans
00:33:11.680 want to
00:33:12.080 punish americans
00:33:13.220 for china
00:33:15.640 sending in
00:33:16.360 precursors
00:33:17.220 that turn
00:33:17.860 into fentanyl
00:33:18.660 and the
00:33:19.140 cartels
00:33:19.540 punish americans
00:33:20.380 now these
00:33:21.580 americans
00:33:21.980 would be
00:33:22.400 breaking the
00:33:22.920 law
00:33:23.220 and causing
00:33:24.280 people to
00:33:24.780 die
00:33:25.020 but just
00:33:25.760 keep in
00:33:26.100 mind that
00:33:26.540 the republican
00:33:27.660 plan is to
00:33:28.480 punish americans
00:33:29.300 okay
00:33:31.040 so that's
00:33:32.960 suboptimal
00:33:33.500 and let's
00:33:35.340 see what else
00:33:35.740 would they do
00:33:36.480 they would
00:33:37.300 they would
00:33:39.000 make it
00:33:39.340 possible to
00:33:40.000 sue
00:33:40.360 countries
00:33:40.880 that are
00:33:41.860 responsible
00:33:42.380 for the
00:33:42.900 fentanyl
00:33:43.280 coming in
00:33:43.780 so i guess
00:33:45.160 you'd be able
00:33:45.540 to sue
00:33:45.920 china
00:33:46.300 and mexico
00:33:47.440 so that's
00:33:49.360 going to
00:33:49.580 work out
00:33:49.920 for you
00:33:50.300 right
00:33:50.640 to sue
00:33:52.740 china
00:33:53.140 because i'm
00:33:54.020 sure they'll
00:33:54.380 pay up
00:33:54.760 when you win
00:33:55.180 your lawsuit
00:33:55.760 how about
00:33:56.800 mexico
00:33:57.180 when you win
00:33:58.560 that lawsuit
00:33:59.240 when how
00:34:00.480 long before
00:34:00.940 the check
00:34:01.340 arrives in
00:34:01.820 the mail
00:34:02.120 i can't
00:34:03.700 imagine this
00:34:04.160 having any
00:34:04.840 use at all
00:34:05.380 you're not
00:34:06.280 going to sue
00:34:06.840 china and get
00:34:07.540 some money
00:34:08.000 are you
00:34:08.360 i don't see
00:34:09.720 how that's
00:34:10.080 going to
00:34:10.240 work
00:34:10.520 so that's
00:34:12.660 toothless
00:34:13.140 so we're
00:34:14.300 going to
00:34:14.460 punish
00:34:14.760 americans
00:34:15.440 because china
00:34:16.360 is attacking
00:34:16.840 us
00:34:17.180 and then
00:34:19.000 we're going
00:34:19.420 to do
00:34:20.420 that thing
00:34:20.840 that makes
00:34:21.160 no difference
00:34:21.640 at all
00:34:22.080 and then
00:34:24.020 there was
00:34:24.260 something about
00:34:24.820 limiting
00:34:25.280 immigration
00:34:26.000 from countries
00:34:27.640 that are
00:34:30.300 involved in
00:34:31.240 this
00:34:31.400 so i guess
00:34:32.200 we're going
00:34:32.500 to try to
00:34:32.840 limit
00:34:33.080 immigration
00:34:33.720 from mexico
00:34:34.780 are you
00:34:37.120 laughing yet
00:34:37.760 that's
00:34:39.500 the fucking
00:34:39.900 republican
00:34:40.440 plan
00:34:40.920 we'll
00:34:42.220 try to
00:34:43.260 limit
00:34:43.520 immigration
00:34:44.400 from countries
00:34:45.100 involved
00:34:45.560 mexico
00:34:46.140 now is
00:34:47.740 there is
00:34:48.240 there a
00:34:48.440 big problem
00:34:48.920 with chinese
00:34:49.500 immigration
00:34:50.100 how many
00:34:52.120 chinese
00:34:52.440 citizens
00:34:52.960 immigrate
00:34:53.400 to the
00:34:53.600 united
00:34:53.800 states
00:34:54.220 i don't
00:34:55.560 think it's
00:34:56.020 a big
00:34:56.260 problem
00:34:56.640 so that's
00:34:57.980 completely
00:34:58.360 toothless
00:34:58.920 i mean it
00:35:00.740 would be
00:35:00.920 like a
00:35:01.300 small
00:35:01.560 annoyance
00:35:02.180 all right
00:35:03.320 so now
00:35:04.420 i'm going
00:35:04.760 to tell
00:35:05.260 the republicans
00:35:06.220 how to do
00:35:06.620 their job
00:35:07.100 you ready
00:35:07.380 for this
00:35:07.740 this is how
00:35:09.200 you do
00:35:09.500 your job
00:35:10.080 if you don't
00:35:10.860 want to be
00:35:11.240 pathetic and
00:35:11.940 weak like
00:35:12.940 their current
00:35:13.460 plan
00:35:13.760 you take
00:35:16.660 fentanyl out
00:35:17.660 of the drug
00:35:18.360 category
00:35:18.960 it needs to
00:35:20.100 be
00:35:20.280 two but
00:35:22.320 for this
00:35:22.640 purposes
00:35:23.080 you say
00:35:24.100 fentanyl is a
00:35:25.200 weapon of
00:35:25.620 mass destruction
00:35:26.360 that comes from
00:35:27.580 china and is
00:35:28.340 weaponized through
00:35:29.060 the cartels
00:35:29.680 china actually
00:35:30.800 sends the
00:35:31.300 precursors that
00:35:32.320 cartels turn
00:35:33.500 into fentanyl
00:35:34.160 and then they
00:35:34.480 ship here
00:35:34.840 in pills
00:35:35.380 here's what
00:35:36.720 you do
00:35:37.040 you say that
00:35:39.820 if an american
00:35:40.640 sells fentanyl
00:35:42.220 to another
00:35:44.120 american
00:35:44.620 that the
00:35:46.100 american who
00:35:46.640 sold it
00:35:47.140 is not a
00:35:48.220 drug dealer
00:35:48.720 they're a
00:35:50.500 traitor
00:35:50.740 and you
00:35:52.540 you prosecute
00:35:54.640 them for a
00:35:55.080 war crime
00:35:55.640 it's a war
00:35:57.040 crime
00:35:57.320 it's treason
00:35:58.300 what is it
00:35:59.580 treason or
00:36:00.180 traitor
00:36:00.460 what's the
00:36:01.360 is it
00:36:02.000 whatever the
00:36:03.220 word is
00:36:03.600 but basically
00:36:04.300 it's collaboration
00:36:05.020 with the
00:36:05.560 enemy
00:36:05.800 and you
00:36:08.180 take it
00:36:08.580 completely
00:36:09.040 out of the
00:36:09.500 drug realm
00:36:10.160 completely
00:36:11.680 out
00:36:12.060 you treat
00:36:13.820 the addicts
00:36:14.880 as addicts
00:36:16.260 you treat
00:36:17.360 the dealers
00:36:17.840 as traitors
00:36:18.640 and you
00:36:20.360 use only
00:36:21.300 traitor law
00:36:22.640 to go after
00:36:23.220 them
00:36:23.460 and you
00:36:24.360 say this
00:36:24.940 is a war
00:36:25.540 and you
00:36:26.340 even get
00:36:26.660 congress
00:36:27.100 let's say
00:36:27.700 you as
00:36:28.560 republicans
00:36:29.220 you ask
00:36:30.040 congress
00:36:30.500 to declare
00:36:31.240 it a war
00:36:31.720 just declare
00:36:34.800 it a war
00:36:35.200 now
00:36:36.460 i don't
00:36:37.400 think that
00:36:37.900 would start
00:36:38.280 a hot
00:36:38.640 war
00:36:38.940 meaning
00:36:39.600 i don't
00:36:39.900 think that
00:36:40.240 would cause
00:36:40.700 china to
00:36:41.300 launch their
00:36:41.820 nukes
00:36:42.240 just because
00:36:42.700 we did
00:36:42.980 some
00:36:43.180 paperwork
00:36:43.560 but we
00:36:44.900 can say
00:36:45.360 this is
00:36:46.020 a weapon
00:36:46.460 of mass
00:36:46.840 destruction
00:36:47.380 describe where
00:36:48.780 it comes
00:36:49.140 from and
00:36:49.640 where it
00:36:50.060 goes through
00:36:50.480 and say
00:36:51.320 if you're
00:36:51.680 an american
00:36:52.540 who is
00:36:52.920 part of
00:36:53.260 this
00:36:53.440 process
00:36:54.020 you're
00:36:56.040 a traitor
00:36:56.400 because you're
00:36:57.640 a part of
00:36:58.020 the war
00:36:58.400 effort for
00:36:59.020 china
00:36:59.320 now here's
00:37:01.460 why this
00:37:01.840 is brilliant
00:37:02.480 number one
00:37:04.200 you can't
00:37:04.780 ignore this
00:37:05.420 right
00:37:06.660 if this
00:37:07.340 started
00:37:07.640 happening
00:37:08.060 the news
00:37:08.740 would have
00:37:09.060 to talk
00:37:09.400 about it
00:37:09.700 all the
00:37:09.960 time
00:37:10.260 because it's
00:37:11.320 just too
00:37:11.640 hard to
00:37:11.940 ignore
00:37:12.240 right
00:37:13.000 so that's
00:37:13.580 the first
00:37:13.900 thing
00:37:14.160 if you want
00:37:15.280 something to
00:37:15.780 be handled
00:37:16.200 you need
00:37:16.580 to get
00:37:16.820 focus
00:37:17.240 on it
00:37:17.680 so it
00:37:18.940 would be
00:37:19.280 a provocative
00:37:19.960 way to get
00:37:20.540 focus
00:37:21.040 it would
00:37:21.720 reframe
00:37:22.220 it
00:37:22.480 have i told
00:37:23.560 you that
00:37:23.880 reframes
00:37:24.500 can be
00:37:25.160 very
00:37:25.400 powerful
00:37:25.840 so you
00:37:27.280 reframe
00:37:27.720 it that
00:37:27.980 way
00:37:28.200 and then
00:37:30.120 you treat
00:37:30.480 it that
00:37:30.760 way
00:37:31.000 now
00:37:32.740 would a
00:37:34.440 drug
00:37:34.740 dealer
00:37:35.080 if they
00:37:36.680 had a
00:37:36.900 choice
00:37:37.200 of selling
00:37:37.760 heroin
00:37:38.360 or being
00:37:41.420 a traitor
00:37:41.880 to the
00:37:42.180 united
00:37:42.420 states
00:37:42.940 now you
00:37:44.880 say to
00:37:45.140 yourself
00:37:45.400 scott
00:37:45.940 if
00:37:46.700 somebody's
00:37:47.160 already
00:37:47.520 a major
00:37:48.100 fentanyl
00:37:49.060 dealer
00:37:49.400 they don't
00:37:50.780 give
00:37:51.040 they don't
00:37:51.900 give a
00:37:52.140 shit about
00:37:52.460 the united
00:37:52.860 states
00:37:53.340 they're
00:37:54.640 already
00:37:55.140 not
00:37:55.580 patriots
00:37:56.680 i think
00:37:57.900 you're
00:37:58.120 wrong
00:37:58.440 i think
00:37:59.920 you're
00:38:00.140 wrong
00:38:00.400 i think
00:38:01.380 you would
00:38:01.620 find out
00:38:02.000 that drug
00:38:02.340 dealers
00:38:02.620 are
00:38:02.820 patriots
00:38:03.280 american
00:38:04.660 drug
00:38:04.940 dealers
00:38:05.260 now not
00:38:06.100 all of
00:38:06.460 them
00:38:06.720 not all
00:38:07.780 of
00:38:07.900 them
00:38:08.100 might be
00:38:08.680 40 percent
00:38:09.460 might be
00:38:10.880 40 percent
00:38:11.640 but i
00:38:13.080 think you
00:38:13.460 could take
00:38:13.860 40 percent
00:38:14.540 of the
00:38:14.780 dealers
00:38:15.100 right out
00:38:15.520 of the
00:38:15.700 market
00:38:15.960 on day
00:38:16.360 one
00:38:16.620 by saying
00:38:18.040 oh
00:38:18.280 shit
00:38:18.760 i don't
00:38:19.920 want to
00:38:20.160 sell out
00:38:20.460 my
00:38:20.600 country
00:38:20.900 i just
00:38:21.180 wanted to
00:38:21.460 make some
00:38:21.780 money
00:38:21.980 and i
00:38:22.240 don't
00:38:22.440 respect
00:38:22.780 this
00:38:23.020 law
00:38:23.320 then what
00:38:26.080 happens if
00:38:26.620 you find out
00:38:27.160 there's a
00:38:27.560 traitor selling
00:38:28.320 drugs on
00:38:29.000 your corner
00:38:29.500 no no not a
00:38:31.540 drug dealer
00:38:31.940 a traitor
00:38:32.540 traitor to
00:38:33.220 the country
00:38:33.640 you're looking
00:38:34.740 at him
00:38:35.120 wait a minute
00:38:36.100 that's not a
00:38:36.580 drug dealer
00:38:37.020 that's a
00:38:38.080 traitor
00:38:38.440 he's not even
00:38:40.920 in my country
00:38:41.500 well you drop
00:38:42.260 the dime
00:38:42.640 you call the
00:38:43.840 police and have
00:38:44.320 the traitor
00:38:44.700 picked up
00:38:45.240 but if he's
00:38:46.160 just a drug
00:38:46.680 dealer do you
00:38:47.220 mind your own
00:38:47.720 business
00:38:48.100 maybe
00:38:48.560 maybe you
00:38:49.920 mind your
00:38:50.240 own
00:38:50.360 business
00:38:50.680 because if
00:38:51.860 you think
00:38:52.160 well he's
00:38:52.540 just coming
00:38:52.860 off these
00:38:53.280 idiots who
00:38:53.820 are on
00:38:54.320 drugs
00:38:54.640 and you
00:38:56.160 don't have
00:38:56.480 much sympathy
00:38:57.020 for idiots
00:38:57.720 on drugs
00:38:58.300 do you
00:38:58.800 because you're
00:38:59.500 like well
00:38:59.840 i'm not on
00:39:00.280 drugs
00:39:00.560 they should
00:39:01.620 be not
00:39:01.980 on drugs
00:39:02.320 too
00:39:02.540 i'm not
00:39:03.520 endorsing
00:39:04.660 that point
00:39:05.060 of view
00:39:05.300 i'm saying
00:39:05.640 that a lot
00:39:05.980 of you
00:39:06.160 have it
00:39:07.140 right
00:39:08.260 so you
00:39:08.860 don't care
00:39:09.400 if a drug
00:39:10.100 dealer kills
00:39:10.940 some fucking
00:39:11.700 drug addict
00:39:12.380 most of you
00:39:13.360 literally don't
00:39:14.120 care
00:39:14.380 be honest
00:39:15.480 you don't
00:39:16.700 care
00:39:17.000 many of you
00:39:17.840 don't
00:39:18.220 i'm not
00:39:18.820 all of you
00:39:19.240 but many
00:39:19.920 of you
00:39:20.160 don't care
00:39:20.600 you really
00:39:21.540 don't care
00:39:21.940 if a drug
00:39:22.660 dealer kills
00:39:23.380 a drug
00:39:23.940 user
00:39:24.260 you don't
00:39:24.920 let's be
00:39:25.640 honest about
00:39:26.080 it
00:39:26.320 you don't
00:39:28.400 right
00:39:28.720 but would
00:39:29.780 you care
00:39:30.300 if a
00:39:32.160 chinese
00:39:32.580 agent or
00:39:33.940 a trader
00:39:34.380 was on
00:39:34.960 your block
00:39:35.580 there's a
00:39:37.660 there's a guy
00:39:38.060 trying to
00:39:38.520 destroy your
00:39:39.080 country
00:39:39.440 he's right
00:39:40.220 there
00:39:40.480 you're looking
00:39:41.460 out your
00:39:41.700 window
00:39:41.860 you're
00:39:42.360 seeing right
00:39:42.760 you're looking
00:39:43.140 right at the
00:39:43.600 guy
00:39:43.820 somebody's
00:39:47.580 gonna shoot
00:39:48.020 him
00:39:48.220 somebody's
00:39:50.080 just gonna
00:39:50.340 fucking
00:39:50.600 kill him
00:39:51.080 just assassinate
00:39:52.780 him right
00:39:53.020 in the corner
00:39:53.460 so some
00:39:54.620 some republican
00:39:55.380 will just walk
00:39:55.960 up with a gun
00:39:56.520 and take his
00:39:56.980 head off
00:39:57.540 not on day
00:39:59.280 one but you'd
00:39:59.920 have to you'd
00:40:00.840 have to really
00:40:01.280 build this thing
00:40:02.000 to the point
00:40:02.600 where people
00:40:03.620 saw it that
00:40:04.180 way for real
00:40:04.760 right so if
00:40:11.060 the 15 year
00:40:12.260 old dies
00:40:12.960 because they
00:40:13.440 thought they
00:40:13.800 got his
00:40:14.140 annex and it
00:40:14.920 was fentanyl
00:40:15.560 and they
00:40:15.900 died from
00:40:16.300 the overdose
00:40:16.940 yeah that's
00:40:18.180 that's not
00:40:18.740 the person
00:40:19.140 we want to
00:40:19.640 hate on
00:40:20.020 you don't
00:40:22.800 want to
00:40:23.020 hate on
00:40:23.300 that person
00:40:23.760 all right
00:40:25.020 so that's
00:40:25.360 my idea
00:40:25.860 so I
00:40:27.620 believe if
00:40:28.080 you reframe
00:40:28.820 it as
00:40:29.340 as a
00:40:30.320 weapon of
00:40:30.740 mass destruction
00:40:31.520 that it
00:40:32.680 doesn't have
00:40:33.180 to be
00:40:33.440 reframed
00:40:34.020 for its
00:40:34.360 medical use
00:40:35.180 because we
00:40:36.980 do the same
00:40:37.460 thing with
00:40:37.960 Botox
00:40:38.440 right
00:40:38.720 Botox
00:40:40.180 can be
00:40:40.580 rat poison
00:40:41.240 if you're
00:40:41.660 killing rats
00:40:42.300 but it
00:40:42.660 can be
00:40:43.140 cosmetic
00:40:44.000 surgery
00:40:44.600 and has
00:40:45.560 other medical
00:40:46.180 uses if
00:40:46.800 you're using
00:40:47.420 it that way
00:40:47.900 so I think
00:40:49.060 we can deal
00:40:49.580 with the fact
00:40:50.100 that it can
00:40:50.560 have a medical
00:40:51.100 use but also
00:40:51.940 be largely
00:40:53.520 treason on
00:40:55.040 the street
00:40:55.460 now do you
00:40:58.920 think you can
00:40:59.580 drone the
00:41:00.140 cartels more
00:41:00.900 likely if
00:41:02.120 you've defined
00:41:02.700 it as a war
00:41:03.440 of course you
00:41:05.140 can of course
00:41:06.760 you can if
00:41:07.920 you define it
00:41:08.520 as an addiction
00:41:09.200 problem in the
00:41:09.940 United States
00:41:10.480 you can't drone
00:41:11.140 the cartels
00:41:11.780 but if you
00:41:13.200 define it as
00:41:13.840 an act of
00:41:14.540 war
00:41:14.780 you can do
00:41:16.760 anything you
00:41:17.140 want
00:41:17.360 because it's
00:41:18.320 a war
00:41:18.600 all right
00:41:21.380 I'm seeing a
00:41:24.300 comment most
00:41:24.980 gun crimes are
00:41:25.820 committed by
00:41:26.300 Democrats
00:41:26.840 is that true
00:41:28.640 it feels like
00:41:30.360 it's true
00:41:30.720 but do we have
00:41:31.620 an actual
00:41:32.060 statistic on
00:41:32.900 that most
00:41:33.960 gun crimes
00:41:34.700 are committed
00:41:35.140 by Democrats
00:41:36.060 because you
00:41:38.040 know what
00:41:38.340 I think
00:41:39.640 Republicans
00:41:40.420 should also
00:41:41.060 do this
00:41:41.560 but more
00:41:41.940 as a joke
00:41:42.500 they should
00:41:44.400 suggest that
00:41:45.480 Democrats
00:41:46.280 only give up
00:41:47.940 their guns
00:41:48.400 so if you
00:41:49.700 register as
00:41:50.360 Democrat
00:41:50.720 you should be
00:41:52.120 required to
00:41:52.680 give up your
00:41:53.140 guns
00:41:53.520 do you know
00:41:55.700 why
00:41:55.980 because it
00:41:57.940 would make
00:41:58.200 the world
00:41:58.500 safer
00:41:58.880 the Democrats
00:41:59.960 say that
00:42:00.560 any gun
00:42:01.500 you take
00:42:01.860 out of the
00:42:02.200 system
00:42:02.480 makes the
00:42:03.400 system
00:42:03.760 safer
00:42:04.140 if you took
00:42:05.320 all the
00:42:05.680 Republican
00:42:06.180 guns
00:42:06.580 I'm sorry
00:42:07.680 if you took
00:42:08.540 only the
00:42:09.360 Democrat
00:42:09.720 guns
00:42:10.140 out of the
00:42:10.580 system
00:42:10.940 wouldn't
00:42:11.940 they be
00:42:12.260 safer
00:42:12.560 that's their
00:42:14.440 exact argument
00:42:15.300 their exact
00:42:17.080 argument
00:42:17.520 is that all
00:42:19.020 guns are
00:42:19.500 dangerous
00:42:19.940 in the
00:42:20.320 public
00:42:20.660 and Republicans
00:42:22.180 have
00:42:22.540 I'm sorry
00:42:23.060 Democrats
00:42:23.520 have tons
00:42:24.000 of guns
00:42:24.540 lots of
00:42:25.600 them
00:42:25.940 so why
00:42:27.520 don't we
00:42:27.800 say prove
00:42:28.740 your point
00:42:29.240 by getting
00:42:29.740 rid of guns
00:42:30.560 from Democrats
00:42:31.420 if the
00:42:33.720 murder rate
00:42:34.620 goes down
00:42:35.240 because Democrats
00:42:36.420 gave up
00:42:36.920 their guns
00:42:37.500 come back
00:42:38.940 to us
00:42:39.240 with your
00:42:39.560 argument
00:42:39.880 I don't
00:42:43.060 know if
00:42:43.260 it would
00:42:43.620 but don't
00:42:45.400 you think
00:42:45.720 that because
00:42:47.120 here's the
00:42:47.620 reframe
00:42:48.040 the reframe
00:42:49.020 is that
00:42:49.380 Republicans
00:42:49.900 largely want
00:42:50.920 guns for
00:42:51.520 self-defense
00:42:52.620 and hunting
00:42:53.380 and protecting
00:42:54.760 the union
00:42:55.380 right
00:42:56.760 the republic
00:42:57.480 and so
00:42:59.180 mostly they
00:42:59.820 use them
00:43:00.120 for that
00:43:00.500 there are
00:43:01.200 plenty of
00:43:01.740 Republican
00:43:02.480 criminals
00:43:03.140 as well
00:43:04.160 but if
00:43:07.040 the Democrats
00:43:07.520 are serious
00:43:08.340 at all
00:43:09.000 about what
00:43:09.500 they want
00:43:09.940 they should
00:43:11.080 disarm first
00:43:12.140 because that's
00:43:13.140 their entire
00:43:13.620 plan
00:43:14.040 their plan
00:43:15.720 is that
00:43:16.140 every gun
00:43:16.660 out of the
00:43:17.000 system
00:43:17.280 makes you
00:43:17.660 better off
00:43:18.200 they don't
00:43:19.020 say take
00:43:19.480 the guns
00:43:19.840 away from
00:43:20.200 the bad
00:43:20.520 people
00:43:20.820 do they
00:43:21.340 they do
00:43:22.460 not
00:43:22.760 they say
00:43:23.460 take all
00:43:24.080 guns away
00:43:24.680 every gun
00:43:26.080 is a danger
00:43:26.740 so if
00:43:28.200 that's true
00:43:28.840 Republicans
00:43:29.720 should
00:43:30.460 tongue in
00:43:31.920 cheek
00:43:32.200 but not
00:43:32.740 really
00:43:33.100 not really
00:43:34.500 they should
00:43:35.320 embrace
00:43:35.840 and amplify
00:43:36.720 have you
00:43:37.640 heard me
00:43:37.880 say that
00:43:38.180 before
00:43:38.460 it's a
00:43:39.160 great
00:43:39.360 persuasion
00:43:39.840 technique
00:43:40.320 embrace
00:43:41.320 and amplify
00:43:42.040 rather than
00:43:43.280 arguing
00:43:43.740 their point
00:43:44.400 you say
00:43:45.400 well
00:43:45.740 why don't
00:43:46.460 we embrace
00:43:46.900 your point
00:43:47.380 we also
00:43:48.860 agree
00:43:49.620 that Democrats
00:43:50.300 should get
00:43:50.780 rid of their
00:43:51.140 guns
00:43:51.480 and let's
00:43:52.540 see if that
00:43:52.900 makes you
00:43:53.200 feel safer
00:43:53.700 and we're
00:43:57.100 all in
00:43:57.880 Republicans
00:43:59.160 on the other
00:43:59.660 hand will
00:44:00.040 keep their
00:44:00.480 guns
00:44:00.800 because we're
00:44:01.560 largely using
00:44:02.260 them for
00:44:02.620 self-defense
00:44:03.720 and hunting
00:44:04.380 stuff you
00:44:05.360 don't care
00:44:05.680 about
00:44:05.940 now
00:44:08.280 would that
00:44:09.480 change
00:44:09.820 anything in
00:44:10.300 the real
00:44:10.660 world
00:44:11.000 probably not
00:44:11.660 but the
00:44:12.720 argument would
00:44:13.280 change
00:44:13.720 if the
00:44:15.420 Republicans
00:44:15.840 stuck to
00:44:16.480 that
00:44:16.800 and just
00:44:17.580 every time
00:44:18.220 a gun
00:44:18.520 control
00:44:18.860 argument
00:44:19.180 came up
00:44:19.620 said
00:44:19.840 look
00:44:20.440 we're
00:44:21.780 we're
00:44:22.280 halfway
00:44:22.680 we should
00:44:23.260 meet in
00:44:23.520 the middle
00:44:23.820 you'd like
00:44:25.840 all guns
00:44:26.320 to go
00:44:26.660 away
00:44:26.920 we'd like
00:44:28.120 people to
00:44:29.100 have guns
00:44:29.620 let's meet
00:44:30.620 in the middle
00:44:30.980 Democrats
00:44:32.440 give away
00:44:32.880 all their
00:44:33.180 guns
00:44:33.420 and see
00:44:33.680 what happens
00:44:34.140 the trouble
00:44:37.160 is how do
00:44:37.600 you argue
00:44:37.900 that
00:44:38.220 how do
00:44:39.940 you argue
00:44:40.280 it
00:44:40.540 the only
00:44:41.340 argument
00:44:41.740 Democrats
00:44:42.500 could have
00:44:42.960 is well
00:44:43.260 we need
00:44:43.580 our guns
00:44:43.940 for self-defense
00:44:44.780 and then
00:44:45.780 what do
00:44:46.100 the Republicans
00:44:46.680 say
00:44:47.080 what do
00:44:49.780 they say
00:44:50.200 no we're
00:44:51.800 not going to
00:44:52.080 give away
00:44:52.400 our guns
00:44:52.780 because you
00:44:53.120 have guns
00:44:53.500 we need
00:44:53.820 guns
00:44:54.040 for self-defense
00:44:54.760 now I
00:45:01.060 don't know
00:45:01.320 how many
00:45:01.600 times I
00:45:02.000 can make
00:45:02.280 the same
00:45:02.680 point
00:45:03.060 being a
00:45:05.680 Republican
00:45:06.200 with a
00:45:06.760 good
00:45:07.000 argument
00:45:07.400 is so
00:45:08.860 fucking
00:45:09.620 easy
00:45:10.000 and nobody's
00:45:11.100 done it
00:45:11.500 nobody's
00:45:12.600 done it
00:45:13.100 not Trump
00:45:14.380 Trump's
00:45:15.300 done the
00:45:15.600 best
00:45:16.020 but I'd
00:45:17.380 give him
00:45:17.740 a B
00:45:18.040 minus
00:45:18.400 I mean
00:45:19.440 his
00:45:19.680 immigration
00:45:20.260 persuasion
00:45:21.020 is terrible
00:45:21.600 it's terrible
00:45:22.900 it's terrible
00:45:23.660 for the
00:45:24.000 public
00:45:24.240 it's good
00:45:24.640 for the
00:45:24.900 base
00:45:25.160 it's terrible
00:45:26.420 as a
00:45:26.940 president
00:45:27.600 so it's
00:45:30.060 baffling
00:45:30.420 isn't it
00:45:30.780 it's baffling
00:45:31.300 how bad
00:45:31.740 they are
00:45:32.180 at communicating
00:45:33.060 because I'm
00:45:34.400 not wrong
00:45:34.980 these are
00:45:35.400 better
00:45:35.660 communication
00:45:36.340 strategies
00:45:37.380 alright
00:45:39.880 there is
00:45:43.580 a hilarious
00:45:44.280 video
00:45:44.880 that I
00:45:45.680 highly
00:45:46.040 recommend
00:45:46.560 just a few
00:45:47.400 minutes of
00:45:47.760 your time
00:45:48.200 you have to
00:45:49.100 watch the
00:45:49.500 clip that's
00:45:49.980 going around
00:45:50.540 I retweeted
00:45:51.240 it this
00:45:51.560 morning
00:45:51.820 so you
00:45:52.080 can see
00:45:52.360 that on
00:45:52.580 my
00:45:52.680 twitter
00:45:52.860 feed
00:45:53.080 of
00:45:53.860 Don
00:45:54.140 Lemon
00:45:54.440 talking
00:45:54.980 to
00:45:55.360 some
00:45:55.960 British
00:45:56.700 woman
00:45:57.080 I think
00:45:58.680 the main
00:45:59.260 topic was
00:45:59.920 the queen
00:46:00.700 but the
00:46:02.140 question of
00:46:02.680 reparations
00:46:03.320 came up
00:46:03.880 and Don
00:46:04.920 Lemon
00:46:05.160 asked her
00:46:05.960 if the
00:46:06.480 Brits
00:46:06.900 should be
00:46:08.140 thinking about
00:46:08.740 paying
00:46:09.000 reparations
00:46:09.720 it didn't
00:46:12.760 go well
00:46:13.260 for Don
00:46:14.720 you have
00:46:17.620 to see
00:46:17.940 this
00:46:18.300 it's like
00:46:19.540 really good
00:46:20.180 and so
00:46:21.040 the woman
00:46:21.500 without
00:46:22.380 losing
00:46:22.940 a beat
00:46:23.940 she
00:46:24.900 describes
00:46:25.500 how
00:46:25.880 so
00:46:26.560 remember
00:46:27.000 I told
00:46:27.360 you
00:46:27.560 to
00:46:27.820 embrace
00:46:28.620 embrace
00:46:30.520 the other
00:46:30.960 argument
00:46:31.340 so instead
00:46:32.740 of saying
00:46:33.220 reparations
00:46:34.000 are stupid
00:46:34.520 get out of
00:46:35.040 here with
00:46:35.280 that dumb
00:46:35.600 idea
00:46:36.160 that would
00:46:36.880 have been
00:46:37.060 a losing
00:46:37.380 argument
00:46:37.760 here's
00:46:39.060 what she
00:46:39.360 said
00:46:39.720 reparations
00:46:42.060 I'm going
00:46:43.400 to paraphrase
00:46:43.980 right so
00:46:44.440 she didn't
00:46:44.760 say it
00:46:44.980 exactly
00:46:45.300 this way
00:46:45.760 reparations
00:46:46.840 absolutely
00:46:47.860 we should
00:46:48.820 go look
00:46:49.160 at the
00:46:49.400 cause
00:46:49.660 of them
00:46:49.940 the cause
00:46:51.220 was the
00:46:52.020 African
00:46:52.520 kings
00:46:52.980 who rounded
00:46:53.540 up their
00:46:53.920 own people
00:46:54.380 and put
00:46:54.700 them in
00:46:54.940 cages
00:46:55.240 and put
00:46:56.140 them on
00:46:56.380 the beach
00:46:56.800 to wait
00:46:57.640 for people
00:46:58.380 to pick
00:46:58.680 them up
00:46:59.060 so they
00:46:59.660 could sell
00:47:00.000 them
00:47:00.200 and they
00:47:01.820 were the
00:47:02.060 beginning
00:47:02.320 and so we
00:47:02.700 should look
00:47:03.120 at those
00:47:03.600 we should
00:47:04.580 look at
00:47:04.940 the
00:47:05.280 descendants
00:47:06.460 of those
00:47:07.780 African
00:47:08.180 kings
00:47:08.680 and ask
00:47:09.340 them for
00:47:09.660 reparations
00:47:10.260 then she
00:47:12.660 pointed out
00:47:13.260 that
00:47:13.640 2,000
00:47:15.060 British
00:47:15.580 soldiers
00:47:16.460 2,000
00:47:17.100 I think
00:47:17.420 Navy
00:47:19.040 people
00:47:19.460 died
00:47:20.400 trying to
00:47:21.240 stop
00:47:21.700 trying to
00:47:23.360 stop
00:47:23.580 slavery
00:47:23.960 and she
00:47:24.700 pointed out
00:47:25.280 and people
00:47:25.740 are debating
00:47:26.280 this by the
00:47:26.780 way
00:47:26.900 but she
00:47:27.320 said
00:47:27.680 that Great
00:47:28.800 Britain
00:47:29.040 was
00:47:29.480 the leader
00:47:30.840 in ending
00:47:31.560 slavery
00:47:32.040 so she
00:47:33.720 said
00:47:34.080 should the
00:47:34.520 British
00:47:35.880 people
00:47:36.160 who died
00:47:36.800 trying to
00:47:37.820 end
00:47:38.180 slavery
00:47:38.760 should they
00:47:39.820 get reparations
00:47:40.540 too
00:47:40.820 because they
00:47:41.600 died
00:47:41.880 fighting on
00:47:42.380 that side
00:47:42.840 so she's
00:47:45.060 like yeah
00:47:45.580 reparations
00:47:47.000 for the
00:47:47.920 sailors who
00:47:48.480 tried to
00:47:48.840 stop it
00:47:49.360 let's give
00:47:51.240 a big hand
00:47:51.820 for the
00:47:52.120 first country
00:47:53.080 in the
00:47:53.360 entire world
00:47:54.120 of civilization
00:47:55.140 who tried
00:47:55.980 to stop
00:47:56.380 slavery
00:47:56.780 Great Britain
00:47:57.320 alright
00:47:57.700 hand for
00:47:58.820 that
00:47:59.040 and what
00:48:00.220 about those
00:48:00.800 African kings
00:48:01.620 we should
00:48:02.700 talk to them
00:48:03.500 about reparations
00:48:04.240 now this
00:48:06.280 is a version
00:48:06.940 of what I've
00:48:07.560 been saying
00:48:08.020 a version
00:48:09.740 of what I've
00:48:10.260 been saying
00:48:10.600 is you
00:48:11.340 can't have
00:48:11.900 a reparations
00:48:12.620 conversation
00:48:13.300 in public
00:48:13.920 do you know
00:48:14.720 why
00:48:14.980 because it'll
00:48:16.300 always go
00:48:16.780 this way
00:48:17.240 if you put
00:48:19.620 me in that
00:48:20.060 conversation
00:48:20.600 what am I
00:48:21.080 going to add
00:48:21.540 I'm going to
00:48:23.360 say well
00:48:24.000 if you look
00:48:26.280 at let's say
00:48:26.860 the model
00:48:28.300 that we have
00:48:28.800 let's say
00:48:29.100 the Japanese
00:48:29.700 internment
00:48:30.240 camps
00:48:30.600 there you
00:48:32.180 had living
00:48:32.960 people still
00:48:33.680 alive who
00:48:34.620 were getting
00:48:34.920 reparations
00:48:35.520 you had
00:48:36.360 a clear
00:48:37.120 enemy
00:48:38.000 the American
00:48:39.420 government
00:48:40.240 no other
00:48:40.880 governments
00:48:41.440 there was
00:48:42.680 no African
00:48:43.260 nations
00:48:43.740 involved
00:48:44.260 it was
00:48:44.780 just our
00:48:45.100 government
00:48:45.480 they made
00:48:46.780 a decision
00:48:47.280 it was
00:48:47.660 purely
00:48:48.280 racist
00:48:48.780 and
00:48:50.240 they knew
00:48:51.700 how much
00:48:52.260 they took
00:48:52.760 so that
00:48:54.500 the people
00:48:54.960 who were
00:48:55.240 rounded up
00:48:55.740 I don't know
00:48:56.060 if you know
00:48:56.380 this
00:48:56.680 but if you
00:48:57.540 owned property
00:48:58.360 and they put
00:48:59.800 you in the
00:49:00.360 Japanese
00:49:00.880 internment
00:49:01.380 camps
00:49:01.700 some white
00:49:04.220 person would
00:49:04.800 go down
00:49:05.160 to the
00:49:05.720 clerk's
00:49:06.760 office
00:49:07.020 and just
00:49:07.480 bribe
00:49:08.300 somebody
00:49:08.640 to change
00:49:09.140 the name
00:49:09.640 on the
00:49:09.880 property
00:49:10.200 and then
00:49:11.020 the white
00:49:11.340 person
00:49:11.580 owns it
00:49:12.020 so the
00:49:13.400 Japanese
00:49:13.840 who were
00:49:14.120 rounded up
00:49:14.600 and put
00:49:14.860 in the
00:49:15.280 internment
00:49:15.900 camps
00:49:16.240 they lost
00:49:17.340 everything
00:49:17.800 everything
00:49:19.400 but we
00:49:20.920 could
00:49:21.120 you know
00:49:21.600 you could
00:49:21.900 get a pretty
00:49:22.360 good idea
00:49:22.920 what that
00:49:23.380 everything
00:49:23.740 was
00:49:24.260 I mean
00:49:24.580 as an
00:49:24.980 estimate
00:49:25.340 you knew
00:49:26.120 exactly
00:49:26.560 who took
00:49:27.060 it
00:49:27.280 and some
00:49:28.620 of those
00:49:28.920 people were
00:49:29.340 still alive
00:49:29.980 lots of
00:49:30.500 them actually
00:49:30.880 so that
00:49:32.160 is your
00:49:32.420 perfect
00:49:32.860 reparations
00:49:33.600 example
00:49:34.360 right
00:49:35.740 but
00:49:36.740 because that
00:49:38.980 that has a
00:49:39.740 that has
00:49:40.380 the comparison
00:49:41.220 built in
00:49:41.860 so you could
00:49:42.760 say what
00:49:43.300 would happen
00:49:43.700 if we
00:49:44.100 didn't do
00:49:44.600 anything
00:49:45.000 with the
00:49:45.680 Japanese
00:49:46.020 American
00:49:46.500 public
00:49:46.960 and then
00:49:48.060 compare it
00:49:48.460 to what
00:49:48.660 happened
00:49:48.900 when we
00:49:49.220 did
00:49:49.480 and you
00:49:50.100 could say
00:49:50.360 oh
00:49:50.560 you had
00:49:51.140 a house
00:49:51.420 you lost
00:49:51.840 a house
00:49:52.260 that's
00:49:53.180 pretty
00:49:53.440 objective
00:49:53.900 right
00:49:54.860 but then
00:49:56.000 you look
00:49:56.320 at the
00:49:57.060 African
00:49:57.860 slaves
00:49:58.360 and you
00:49:59.500 get some
00:49:59.840 economists
00:50:00.340 involved
00:50:00.840 the first
00:50:01.780 thing
00:50:01.980 they're
00:50:02.180 going to
00:50:02.340 do
00:50:02.560 is
00:50:02.940 the first
00:50:03.700 thing
00:50:03.860 that happened
00:50:04.180 in the
00:50:04.660 Japanese
00:50:05.140 internment
00:50:05.560 case
00:50:05.820 what are we
00:50:06.620 comparing it
00:50:07.140 to
00:50:07.320 well you're
00:50:09.600 comparing it
00:50:10.100 to staying
00:50:10.560 in Africa
00:50:11.060 and having
00:50:12.720 a king
00:50:13.200 who doesn't
00:50:13.660 mind selling
00:50:14.180 you and
00:50:14.540 putting you
00:50:14.860 in a cage
00:50:15.340 so you
00:50:18.060 would go
00:50:18.340 back to a
00:50:18.880 situation
00:50:19.380 where that
00:50:20.660 was okay
00:50:21.200 right
00:50:22.760 so that
00:50:23.320 was your
00:50:23.620 alternative
00:50:24.100 now I'm
00:50:25.920 not saying
00:50:26.260 that slavery
00:50:26.920 was better
00:50:27.500 than that
00:50:28.000 I don't
00:50:28.480 know
00:50:28.680 sounds like
00:50:29.400 they were
00:50:29.580 both pretty
00:50:30.040 terrible
00:50:30.400 I'm saying
00:50:31.500 that that's
00:50:31.900 what you
00:50:32.100 have to
00:50:32.360 compare it
00:50:32.820 to
00:50:33.020 so you'd
00:50:33.660 say
00:50:33.860 are
00:50:34.140 Americans
00:50:34.620 who came
00:50:38.140 from the
00:50:39.260 legacy of
00:50:39.820 slavery
00:50:40.200 do they have
00:50:41.280 more or
00:50:41.920 less
00:50:42.340 money
00:50:44.040 than the
00:50:45.580 people who
00:50:46.000 stayed in
00:50:46.460 Africa
00:50:46.780 and were
00:50:47.240 not sold
00:50:47.720 as slaves
00:50:48.500 that's
00:50:49.480 the comparison
00:50:50.400 and what
00:50:51.540 you'd find
00:50:51.960 is that
00:50:52.300 they're doing
00:50:52.600 better
00:50:52.940 so what
00:50:56.040 do you do
00:50:56.300 with that
00:50:56.780 see the
00:50:58.160 trouble is
00:50:58.700 slavery
00:50:59.940 was
00:51:00.480 sort of
00:51:01.600 a
00:51:01.840 except for
00:51:03.100 the
00:51:03.240 Holocaust
00:51:03.540 I suppose
00:51:04.280 an
00:51:04.560 incomparable
00:51:06.200 evil
00:51:06.860 right
00:51:08.480 the evil
00:51:10.240 is the
00:51:10.580 thing that's
00:51:11.140 under our
00:51:12.060 skin
00:51:12.380 so to
00:51:13.740 speak
00:51:14.020 you know
00:51:16.000 it's the
00:51:16.460 evil of it
00:51:16.960 you feel like
00:51:17.380 you need to
00:51:17.780 address the
00:51:18.260 evil
00:51:18.520 but you
00:51:19.080 can't do
00:51:19.400 it
00:51:19.520 economically
00:51:20.080 because the
00:51:21.100 economics
00:51:21.640 weirdly
00:51:22.140 were not
00:51:22.580 the evil
00:51:22.960 part
00:51:23.300 the
00:51:24.180 economics
00:51:24.700 were
00:51:25.180 coincidentally
00:51:26.140 weirdly
00:51:27.620 somewhat
00:51:28.160 positive
00:51:28.720 you could
00:51:29.440 make the
00:51:29.760 argument
00:51:30.080 it was
00:51:31.220 just a
00:51:31.780 horrible
00:51:32.100 human
00:51:32.540 thing
00:51:32.840 to do
00:51:33.180 so there's
00:51:34.420 no way
00:51:34.680 you could
00:51:34.880 have the
00:51:35.120 argument
00:51:35.360 in public
00:51:35.780 because
00:51:36.420 it would
00:51:37.160 devolve
00:51:37.560 into that
00:51:38.180 where you
00:51:39.780 would get
00:51:40.300 a big
00:51:40.560 dose of
00:51:41.160 how do
00:51:41.580 you calculate
00:51:42.080 stuff
00:51:42.500 how do
00:51:42.760 you compare
00:51:43.120 things
00:51:43.500 what's the
00:51:44.360 real value
00:51:44.880 of things
00:51:45.420 oh there
00:51:51.100 we go
00:51:51.460 so there's
00:51:53.280 a comment
00:51:53.700 on YouTube
00:51:54.760 Dallas
00:51:55.680 Hosie says
00:51:56.380 it's working
00:51:57.840 I'm an
00:51:58.240 attorney
00:51:58.560 and today
00:51:59.080 I had a
00:51:59.440 large
00:51:59.680 institutional
00:52:00.340 client
00:52:01.000 ask if
00:52:01.680 the
00:52:01.880 shareholders
00:52:02.360 of their
00:52:02.860 company
00:52:03.320 could sue
00:52:04.280 the entities
00:52:04.920 pushing ESG
00:52:06.280 as it drives
00:52:07.440 down their
00:52:07.880 share price
00:52:08.500 you're welcome
00:52:11.340 now did I
00:52:14.440 tell you that
00:52:15.080 when Dilbert
00:52:16.180 talks about
00:52:18.360 something
00:52:18.880 as a
00:52:20.040 well-known
00:52:20.500 thing
00:52:20.920 that that
00:52:21.940 becomes a
00:52:22.540 legal
00:52:23.000 standard
00:52:23.640 I've told
00:52:24.880 you that
00:52:25.140 before
00:52:25.420 right
00:52:25.660 so the
00:52:26.740 Dilbert
00:52:27.000 comic strip
00:52:27.560 has been
00:52:27.880 used as
00:52:28.340 a legal
00:52:28.800 standard
00:52:29.320 to define
00:52:30.820 when you
00:52:31.280 should have
00:52:31.580 known
00:52:31.800 something
00:52:32.220 if it's
00:52:32.980 in the
00:52:33.220 comic
00:52:33.500 you should
00:52:35.340 have known
00:52:35.660 it
00:52:36.000 I mean
00:52:36.540 if I
00:52:37.260 can put
00:52:37.580 it in a
00:52:37.880 comic strip
00:52:38.400 without
00:52:38.860 describing
00:52:39.660 it
00:52:40.020 that's
00:52:40.900 the
00:52:41.040 standard
00:52:41.380 I can
00:52:42.320 publish it
00:52:42.820 without
00:52:43.080 having to
00:52:43.640 describe
00:52:44.140 it
00:52:44.420 that means
00:52:45.440 you should
00:52:45.960 have
00:52:46.060 known
00:52:46.320 right
00:52:47.120 now
00:52:48.300 Dilbert
00:52:49.440 is
00:52:49.700 mocking
00:52:50.120 it
00:52:50.420 as
00:52:50.740 a
00:52:51.080 terrible
00:52:52.220 thing
00:52:52.560 so
00:52:53.640 that's
00:52:53.820 what
00:52:53.920 I've
00:52:54.040 been
00:52:54.140 doing
00:52:54.360 all
00:52:54.540 week
00:52:54.820 now
00:52:55.700 that
00:52:55.860 I'm
00:52:56.060 mocking
00:52:56.360 it
00:52:56.580 as
00:52:56.720 a
00:52:56.860 terrible
00:52:57.120 thing
00:52:57.520 that
00:52:58.420 frees
00:52:59.100 all
00:52:59.480 the
00:52:59.620 people
00:52:59.880 who
00:53:00.240 were
00:53:00.540 going
00:53:00.700 to
00:53:00.800 say
00:53:01.020 can
00:53:01.640 we
00:53:01.800 say
00:53:02.000 this
00:53:02.200 was
00:53:02.380 a
00:53:02.540 terrible
00:53:02.780 thing
00:53:03.100 can
00:53:04.000 I
00:53:04.120 say
00:53:04.280 this
00:53:04.480 out
00:53:04.660 loud
00:53:04.980 now
00:53:06.380 you
00:53:06.520 can
00:53:06.760 because
00:53:07.680 it's
00:53:07.900 in
00:53:08.020 a
00:53:08.120 Dilbert
00:53:08.340 comic
00:53:08.700 right
00:53:09.660 I
00:53:10.380 basically
00:53:10.800 took
00:53:11.120 the
00:53:11.280 cancellation
00:53:11.640 risk
00:53:12.160 for
00:53:12.420 you
00:53:12.640 you
00:53:13.700 don't
00:53:13.880 need
00:53:14.080 to
00:53:14.180 get
00:53:14.360 cancelled
00:53:14.640 because
00:53:14.920 the
00:53:16.280 newspaper
00:53:16.600 published
00:53:17.120 it
00:53:17.360 I
00:53:18.420 took
00:53:18.680 the
00:53:19.460 risk
00:53:19.780 and
00:53:20.900 I
00:53:21.060 did
00:53:21.280 in fact
00:53:21.740 get
00:53:21.940 cancelled
00:53:22.300 in a
00:53:22.640 number
00:53:22.820 of
00:53:22.940 papers
00:53:23.240 I
00:53:23.620 don't
00:53:23.760 know
00:53:23.860 if
00:53:23.980 it's
00:53:24.120 temporary
00:53:24.480 or
00:53:24.720 permanent
00:53:24.980 yet
00:53:25.280 but
00:53:25.900 a
00:53:26.000 number
00:53:26.180 of
00:53:26.300 papers
00:53:26.580 stopped
00:53:27.220 running
00:53:27.560 Dilbert
00:53:27.960 for
00:53:29.000 that
00:53:29.180 series
00:53:29.660 because
00:53:30.660 I
00:53:30.780 think
00:53:30.980 that
00:53:31.160 they
00:53:31.300 have
00:53:31.540 ESG
00:53:32.140 influences
00:53:32.800 as
00:53:33.100 well
00:53:33.300 I
00:53:33.980 don't
00:53:34.100 know
00:53:34.300 but
00:53:34.440 I
00:53:34.540 think
00:53:34.680 that's
00:53:34.860 probably
00:53:35.080 what
00:53:35.240 it
00:53:35.340 was
00:53:35.580 however
00:53:37.520 there
00:53:37.880 were
00:53:38.020 enough
00:53:38.280 that
00:53:38.520 ran
00:53:38.780 it
00:53:38.920 and
00:53:39.020 ran
00:53:39.300 online
00:53:39.780 and
00:53:40.060 probably
00:53:40.380 got
00:53:40.640 copied
00:53:42.000 and
00:53:42.280 sent
00:53:42.440 to
00:53:42.580 everybody
00:53:42.940 so
00:53:43.800 at
00:53:43.980 this
00:53:44.180 point
00:53:44.480 I've
00:53:44.820 established
00:53:45.420 a
00:53:45.960 legal
00:53:46.640 standard
00:53:47.940 which
00:53:49.400 is
00:53:49.680 that
00:53:50.000 anybody
00:53:50.680 involved
00:53:52.060 in
00:53:52.240 ESG
00:53:52.820 should
00:53:54.220 have
00:53:54.400 known
00:53:54.680 what
00:53:54.900 they
00:53:55.020 were
00:53:55.140 getting
00:53:55.380 into
00:53:55.720 you
00:53:58.140 can
00:53:58.320 no
00:53:58.540 longer
00:53:58.860 claim
00:53:59.260 you
00:53:59.460 didn't
00:53:59.760 know
00:53:59.980 it
00:54:00.120 was
00:54:00.240 a
00:54:00.380 problem
00:54:00.780 do
00:54:02.200 you
00:54:02.260 see
00:54:02.380 the
00:54:02.520 power
00:54:02.740 of
00:54:02.880 that
00:54:03.100 that's
00:54:04.860 really
00:54:05.080 powerful
00:54:05.500 because
00:54:06.740 anybody
00:54:07.280 before
00:54:07.780 could
00:54:08.020 have
00:54:08.120 said
00:54:08.260 well
00:54:08.540 ESG
00:54:09.060 sounded
00:54:09.400 like
00:54:09.640 a
00:54:09.780 good
00:54:09.940 idea
00:54:10.320 it
00:54:10.960 had
00:54:11.100 all
00:54:11.280 these
00:54:11.500 noble
00:54:11.880 goals
00:54:12.400 and
00:54:12.780 by
00:54:12.920 the
00:54:13.000 way
00:54:13.100 the
00:54:13.240 goals
00:54:13.520 of
00:54:13.640 ESG
00:54:13.920 are
00:54:14.060 great
00:54:14.360 I
00:54:15.280 love
00:54:15.460 the
00:54:15.580 goals
00:54:15.900 it's
00:54:16.720 just
00:54:16.880 that
00:54:17.100 when
00:54:17.260 you
00:54:17.520 take
00:54:17.980 this
00:54:18.260 outside
00:54:18.640 control
00:54:19.180 and
00:54:19.460 you
00:54:19.560 layer
00:54:19.840 it
00:54:20.020 onto
00:54:20.200 the
00:54:20.400 free
00:54:20.600 market
00:54:20.940 you
00:54:21.600 don't
00:54:21.780 get
00:54:21.940 a
00:54:22.040 good
00:54:22.160 result
00:54:22.520 so
00:54:23.460 it's
00:54:23.820 about
00:54:24.060 implementation
00:54:24.920 you
00:54:25.200 just
00:54:25.340 can't
00:54:25.580 implement
00:54:25.900 something
00:54:26.200 like
00:54:26.420 that
00:54:26.660 so
00:54:28.820 I
00:54:30.020 believe
00:54:30.520 that
00:54:31.760 I
00:54:31.900 have
00:54:32.020 accomplished
00:54:32.620 my
00:54:32.960 mission
00:54:33.260 I'm
00:54:34.820 still
00:54:35.200 working
00:54:35.620 because
00:54:39.060 canceled
00:54:39.420 then
00:54:40.840 nobody
00:54:41.220 would
00:54:41.420 raise
00:54:41.680 their
00:54:41.900 head
00:54:42.200 right
00:54:42.500 if
00:54:43.900 I
00:54:44.020 talked
00:54:44.300 down
00:54:44.460 against
00:54:44.740 ESG
00:54:45.180 and
00:54:45.360 got
00:54:45.540 completely
00:54:46.100 canceled
00:54:46.600 there's
00:54:48.460 no
00:54:48.600 stockholder
00:54:49.240 who's
00:54:49.500 going to
00:54:50.240 there's
00:54:50.820 no
00:54:50.940 employee
00:54:51.340 who's
00:54:51.600 going to
00:54:51.820 complain
00:54:52.180 that's
00:54:52.540 for
00:54:52.680 sure
00:54:52.880 so
00:54:53.940 by
00:54:54.280 flying
00:54:54.780 close
00:54:55.180 to
00:54:55.340 the
00:54:55.520 sun
00:54:55.780 and
00:54:56.560 surviving
00:54:57.140 I
00:54:58.980 increased
00:55:00.060 the
00:55:00.300 envelope
00:55:00.760 of
00:55:01.080 conversation
00:55:01.700 so
00:55:02.740 now
00:55:02.920 people
00:55:03.220 know
00:55:03.640 they
00:55:03.820 can
00:55:03.960 go
00:55:04.120 at
00:55:04.220 least
00:55:04.400 as
00:55:04.560 far
00:55:04.700 as
00:55:04.820 I
00:55:04.980 went
00:55:05.240 they
00:55:06.120 can
00:55:06.260 go
00:55:06.380 that
00:55:06.560 far
00:55:06.820 because
00:55:07.820 I
00:55:08.000 did
00:55:08.160 it
00:55:08.280 and
00:55:09.060 they
00:55:09.980 can
00:55:10.160 say
00:55:10.440 hey
00:55:10.700 it's
00:55:10.840 not
00:55:11.000 just
00:55:11.180 me
00:55:11.480 this
00:55:12.400 is
00:55:12.560 everywhere
00:55:12.960 this
00:55:13.620 is
00:55:13.740 not
00:55:13.900 my
00:55:14.340 opinion
00:55:15.440 look
00:55:15.800 it's
00:55:15.980 in
00:55:16.100 the
00:55:16.220 newspaper
00:55:16.600 the
00:55:17.420 newspapers
00:55:17.860 are
00:55:18.080 publishing
00:55:18.360 this
00:55:18.760 so
00:55:21.960 I
00:55:25.160 think
00:55:25.540 that
00:55:27.200 maybe
00:55:27.640 three
00:55:28.580 occasions
00:55:29.180 the
00:55:30.720 thing
00:55:31.000 that
00:55:31.200 I've
00:55:31.700 maybe
00:55:33.280 influenced
00:55:33.880 it's
00:55:34.400 hard
00:55:34.540 to
00:55:34.660 know
00:55:34.860 is
00:55:36.020 that
00:55:36.360 there
00:55:36.960 are
00:55:37.060 some
00:55:37.260 things
00:55:37.540 that
00:55:37.700 are
00:55:37.820 just
00:55:38.000 too
00:55:38.260 wild
00:55:38.640 to
00:55:38.920 think
00:55:39.200 about
00:55:39.460 and
00:55:40.980 if
00:55:41.260 I
00:55:41.400 can
00:55:41.580 make
00:55:41.820 you
00:55:41.960 think
00:55:42.200 about
00:55:42.440 it
00:55:42.640 then
00:55:43.380 it
00:55:43.520 becomes
00:55:43.900 part
00:55:44.300 of
00:55:44.420 the
00:55:44.540 conversation
00:55:45.140 I hate
00:55:45.600 to use
00:55:45.840 that
00:55:46.020 phrase
00:55:46.300 but
00:55:46.900 it's
00:55:47.080 something
00:55:47.280 you can
00:55:47.740 talk
00:55:48.040 about
00:55:48.340 because
00:55:49.020 it
00:55:49.160 has
00:55:49.360 been
00:55:49.520 talking
00:55:49.820 about
00:55:50.080 somebody
00:55:51.040 did
00:55:51.340 it
00:55:51.560 so
00:55:52.700 I
00:55:52.840 think
00:55:53.020 I
00:55:53.160 did
00:55:53.300 that
00:55:53.500 with
00:55:53.880 closing
00:55:55.500 travel
00:55:55.960 with
00:55:56.180 China
00:55:56.440 that
00:55:57.140 was
00:55:57.280 unthinkable
00:55:58.060 but
00:55:59.120 when I
00:55:59.380 started
00:55:59.640 talking
00:55:59.960 about
00:56:00.220 it
00:56:00.300 you're
00:56:00.380 like
00:56:00.480 that's
00:56:00.700 unthinkable
00:56:01.260 well
00:56:02.240 I'm
00:56:02.820 thinking
00:56:03.040 about
00:56:03.280 it
00:56:03.380 now
00:56:03.620 and
00:56:04.620 then
00:56:08.640 unthinkable
00:56:09.440 but
00:56:11.020 people
00:56:11.320 like me
00:56:11.720 talked
00:56:12.040 about
00:56:12.280 it
00:56:12.540 and
00:56:13.060 then
00:56:13.200 you
00:56:13.380 thought
00:56:13.560 about
00:56:13.780 it
00:56:14.040 and
00:56:14.920 after
00:56:15.140 you
00:56:15.300 thought
00:56:15.560 about
00:56:15.780 it
00:56:15.900 for
00:56:16.120 a
00:56:16.240 while
00:56:16.460 it
00:56:16.740 was
00:56:16.860 no
00:56:17.020 longer
00:56:17.320 unthinkable
00:56:17.880 you
00:56:18.760 might
00:56:18.940 not
00:56:19.100 want
00:56:19.320 to
00:56:19.420 do
00:56:19.580 it
00:56:19.840 but
00:56:20.860 it
00:56:20.980 was
00:56:21.140 definitely
00:56:21.580 part
00:56:21.980 of
00:56:22.060 the
00:56:22.160 conversation
00:56:22.680 though
00:56:22.960 with
00:56:25.620 fentanyl
00:56:27.100 being
00:56:27.440 treated
00:56:27.900 as
00:56:28.260 a
00:56:28.620 weapon
00:56:29.440 of
00:56:29.640 mass
00:56:29.900 destruction
00:56:30.380 and
00:56:30.880 treating
00:56:31.140 our
00:56:31.360 dealers
00:56:31.600 as
00:56:31.900 traders
00:56:32.300 and
00:56:32.520 not
00:56:32.660 dealers
00:56:32.980 that's
00:56:34.600 a
00:56:34.740 wild
00:56:35.060 idea
00:56:35.420 isn't
00:56:35.620 it
00:56:36.120 if
00:56:37.000 nobody
00:56:37.400 had
00:56:38.640 could
00:56:38.940 you
00:56:39.060 imagine
00:56:39.380 a
00:56:39.580 Republican
00:56:39.940 presenting
00:56:40.980 it
00:56:41.260 it'd
00:56:42.180 be
00:56:42.240 kind of
00:56:42.500 risky
00:56:42.800 might
00:56:43.680 get
00:56:43.840 laughed
00:56:44.100 at
00:56:44.300 right
00:56:44.500 but
00:56:45.380 because
00:56:45.680 I've
00:56:46.020 presented
00:56:46.380 it
00:56:46.640 and I
00:56:47.000 got a
00:56:47.260 positive
00:56:47.600 response
00:56:48.240 now
00:56:49.040 it's
00:56:49.260 safe
00:56:49.560 isn't
00:56:51.300 it
00:56:51.720 if
00:56:52.160 there's
00:56:52.680 anybody
00:56:52.920 in
00:56:53.180 Congress
00:56:53.540 watching
00:56:54.020 this
00:56:54.260 right
00:56:54.460 now
00:56:54.700 you
00:56:55.740 just
00:56:56.020 learned
00:56:56.460 that
00:56:57.320 you
00:56:57.480 could
00:56:57.660 say
00:56:57.840 that
00:56:58.040 in
00:56:58.160 public
00:56:58.440 and
00:56:58.720 you're
00:56:58.900 going
00:56:59.020 to
00:56:59.100 get
00:56:59.260 a
00:56:59.380 good
00:56:59.620 feedback
00:57:01.380 right
00:57:02.660 probably
00:57:03.680 Thomas
00:57:04.240 Massey
00:57:04.620 might
00:57:04.840 see
00:57:05.020 this
00:57:05.420 Tom
00:57:06.700 Cotton
00:57:07.020 sees
00:57:07.400 some
00:57:07.840 of
00:57:07.940 the
00:57:08.020 clips
00:57:08.320 I
00:57:08.580 know
00:57:08.780 there's
00:57:09.200 a
00:57:09.440 number
00:57:09.700 of
00:57:09.860 other
00:57:10.060 people
00:57:10.380 I
00:57:10.520 won't
00:57:10.660 mention
00:57:10.960 but
00:57:11.900 there
00:57:12.020 are
00:57:12.080 a
00:57:12.140 number
00:57:12.260 of
00:57:12.360 people
00:57:12.520 in
00:57:12.660 Congress
00:57:12.940 who
00:57:13.100 do
00:57:13.240 watch
00:57:13.480 this
00:57:13.740 and
00:57:14.100 staffers
00:57:14.700 etc
00:57:14.980 so
00:57:16.940 I
00:57:17.600 feel
00:57:18.000 like
00:57:18.220 that's
00:57:19.040 maybe
00:57:19.720 the
00:57:20.020 thing
00:57:20.280 I
00:57:20.440 can
00:57:20.640 do
00:57:20.960 that
00:57:22.460 really
00:57:22.680 makes
00:57:22.940 a
00:57:23.060 difference
00:57:23.340 I
00:57:23.940 can
00:57:24.320 take
00:57:24.620 your
00:57:24.800 mind
00:57:25.120 where
00:57:25.360 you
00:57:25.540 didn't
00:57:25.800 know
00:57:26.120 would
00:57:26.820 be
00:57:27.000 safe
00:57:27.360 I
00:57:28.280 can
00:57:28.400 just
00:57:28.540 make
00:57:28.740 it
00:57:28.840 safe
00:57:29.060 for
00:57:29.240 you
00:57:29.440 so
00:57:30.480 that's
00:57:30.940 what
00:57:31.040 I'll
00:57:31.160 continue
00:57:31.540 doing
00:57:31.920 all
00:57:34.640 right
00:57:34.840 what
00:57:36.220 else
00:57:36.420 is
00:57:36.540 going
00:57:36.700 on
00:57:37.040 oh
00:57:37.880 so
00:57:39.040 yesterday's
00:57:41.040 Dilbert
00:57:41.300 joke
00:57:41.700 mentioned
00:57:43.760 non-binaries
00:57:44.940 and you
00:57:45.940 probably said
00:57:46.460 to yourself
00:57:46.900 oh
00:57:47.980 no
00:57:48.740 don't
00:57:50.100 go there
00:57:50.660 if you
00:57:51.460 mention
00:57:52.040 non-binaries
00:57:53.100 in your
00:57:54.580 Dilbert
00:57:54.900 comic
00:57:55.360 you're
00:57:56.020 going to
00:57:56.300 get
00:57:56.460 cancelled
00:57:56.820 so
00:57:57.880 I
00:57:58.020 mentioned
00:57:58.320 non-binaries
00:57:59.160 in my
00:57:59.520 Dilbert
00:57:59.780 comic
00:58:00.120 and
00:58:01.780 not
00:58:02.200 only
00:58:02.400 did
00:58:02.580 I
00:58:02.700 not
00:58:02.920 get
00:58:03.060 cancelled
00:58:03.380 but
00:58:03.680 I
00:58:03.800 got
00:58:03.940 retweeted
00:58:04.520 by
00:58:04.680 the
00:58:04.880 association
00:58:05.480 of
00:58:05.820 LGBTQ
00:58:06.620 plus
00:58:07.480 corporate
00:58:08.480 directors
00:58:09.040 whose
00:58:09.920 mission
00:58:10.240 is
00:58:10.460 to
00:58:10.680 get
00:58:10.840 more
00:58:11.040 diversity
00:58:11.540 in
00:58:11.740 the
00:58:11.840 boardrooms
00:58:12.320 and
00:58:13.540 they
00:58:14.100 loved
00:58:14.340 it
00:58:14.600 they
00:58:15.480 loved
00:58:15.680 it
00:58:15.960 now
00:58:17.840 let
00:58:18.060 me
00:58:18.160 give
00:58:18.320 a
00:58:18.500 shout
00:58:18.820 out
00:58:19.060 to
00:58:19.460 the
00:58:19.700 LGBTQ
00:58:20.340 plus
00:58:21.280 community
00:58:21.720 and
00:58:22.440 most
00:58:22.840 specifically
00:58:23.660 the
00:58:23.960 gay
00:58:24.160 community
00:58:24.640 has
00:58:25.560 anybody
00:58:26.040 done
00:58:26.340 a
00:58:26.520 better
00:58:26.740 job
00:58:27.220 of
00:58:27.460 persuasion
00:58:28.040 like
00:58:29.340 in
00:58:29.500 the
00:58:29.660 history
00:58:30.040 of
00:58:30.400 the
00:58:30.520 whole
00:58:30.960 freaking
00:58:31.340 world
00:58:31.780 the
00:58:33.000 gays
00:58:33.540 are
00:58:34.400 awesome
00:58:34.940 at
00:58:35.120 this
00:58:35.400 so
00:58:36.400 so
00:58:36.760 good
00:58:37.180 this
00:58:37.720 was
00:58:37.900 exactly
00:58:38.480 the
00:58:38.780 right
00:58:39.000 response
00:58:39.540 to
00:58:39.760 me
00:58:40.040 the
00:58:41.640 wrong
00:58:41.980 response
00:58:42.520 was
00:58:42.880 you
00:58:44.180 tried
00:58:44.400 to
00:58:44.560 use
00:58:44.800 us
00:58:44.960 as
00:58:45.140 a
00:58:45.260 dupe
00:58:45.580 why
00:58:46.220 are
00:58:46.320 you
00:58:46.420 bringing
00:58:46.660 us
00:58:46.880 into
00:58:47.060 this
00:58:47.440 stop
00:58:48.180 making
00:58:48.460 it
00:58:48.580 about
00:58:48.760 LGBTQ
00:58:49.320 with
00:58:49.980 your
00:58:50.220 Republican
00:58:51.040 audience
00:58:51.640 are
00:58:52.080 you
00:58:52.220 mocking
00:58:52.500 us
00:58:52.840 nope
00:58:53.580 this
00:58:55.200 is
00:58:55.360 fun
00:58:55.640 do
00:58:56.140 some
00:58:56.300 more
00:58:56.520 how
00:58:59.560 awesome
00:58:59.880 is
00:59:00.040 that
00:59:00.260 how
00:59:00.780 awesome
00:59:01.060 is
00:59:01.200 that
00:59:01.380 right
00:59:01.620 very
00:59:03.300 awesome
00:59:03.660 so
00:59:06.340 and
00:59:08.040 the
00:59:08.220 joke
00:59:08.460 was
00:59:08.820 that
00:59:09.160 ESG
00:59:10.720 measures
00:59:11.440 your
00:59:11.700 environmental
00:59:12.140 impact
00:59:13.160 as well
00:59:13.680 as your
00:59:14.080 diversity
00:59:14.660 and
00:59:15.760 the
00:59:15.900 joke
00:59:16.140 was
00:59:16.420 that
00:59:16.580 the
00:59:16.720 CEO
00:59:17.100 knew
00:59:17.520 that
00:59:17.720 they
00:59:17.880 couldn't
00:59:18.140 do
00:59:18.280 much
00:59:18.520 about
00:59:18.700 their
00:59:18.880 CO2
00:59:19.380 emissions
00:59:19.780 they
00:59:20.060 were
00:59:20.180 going
00:59:20.340 to
00:59:20.420 go
00:59:20.620 up
00:59:20.880 so
00:59:21.540 he
00:59:21.660 was
00:59:21.780 going
00:59:21.920 to
00:59:22.060 compensate
00:59:22.920 and
00:59:24.420 he
00:59:25.380 was
00:59:25.540 asked
00:59:25.780 how much
00:59:26.240 the
00:59:26.440 emissions
00:59:26.840 would
00:59:27.140 go up
00:59:27.620 his
00:59:28.500 answer
00:59:28.780 would
00:59:28.980 go up
00:59:29.220 about
00:59:29.580 one
00:59:30.000 non-binary
00:59:30.700 board
00:59:31.620 member
00:59:31.920 so
00:59:33.420 they're
00:59:33.560 just
00:59:33.700 using
00:59:33.980 it
00:59:34.160 as
00:59:34.280 a
00:59:34.500 scale
00:59:34.900 for
00:59:35.200 CO2
00:59:36.300 emissions
00:59:36.720 yeah
00:59:37.600 how much
00:59:38.360 CO2
00:59:38.760 emissions
00:59:39.100 do
00:59:39.260 you
00:59:39.320 it was
00:59:40.240 about
00:59:40.520 two
00:59:42.040 non-binaries
00:59:42.920 and
00:59:44.660 but if
00:59:46.320 we
00:59:46.420 build
00:59:46.620 another
00:59:46.920 factory
00:59:47.300 it's
00:59:47.540 going
00:59:47.640 to
00:59:47.680 be
00:59:47.900 two
00:59:48.380 binaries
00:59:48.900 a
00:59:49.120 lesbian
00:59:49.420 and
00:59:49.880 possibly
00:59:51.600 a
00:59:52.220 gay
00:59:52.380 man
00:59:52.640 so
00:59:54.300 that's
00:59:54.620 how much
00:59:54.920 emissions
00:59:55.240 we have
00:59:55.640 anyway
00:59:56.640 I just
00:59:57.040 thought it
00:59:57.260 was funny
00:59:57.620 to
00:59:57.840 equate
00:59:58.640 them
00:59:58.860 as
00:59:59.080 like
00:59:59.380 currency
00:59:59.900 two
01:00:00.420 things
01:00:00.680 you
01:00:00.840 could
01:00:01.020 trade
01:00:01.420 off
01:00:01.700 all
01:00:04.840 right
01:00:05.000 I
01:00:06.620 don't
01:00:06.780 know
01:00:07.040 but
01:00:07.320 I
01:00:08.320 feel
01:00:08.620 like
01:00:09.000 this
01:00:11.040 was
01:00:11.240 the
01:00:11.740 best
01:00:12.060 live
01:00:12.580 stream
01:00:12.960 of
01:00:14.240 all
01:00:14.440 time
01:00:14.780 I
01:00:17.200 feel
01:00:17.560 like
01:00:17.700 it
01:00:17.820 was
01:00:18.220 am
01:00:19.340 I
01:00:19.480 crazy
01:00:19.900 no
01:00:21.040 it
01:00:21.180 was
01:00:21.520 it
01:00:21.820 was
01:00:22.100 it
01:00:22.760 was
01:00:22.900 the
01:00:23.060 best
01:00:23.320 one
01:00:23.540 of
01:00:23.680 all
01:00:23.840 time
01:00:24.140 and
01:00:26.660 I
01:00:26.800 think
01:00:26.940 we
01:00:27.080 should
01:00:27.240 drink
01:00:27.460 to
01:00:27.600 that
01:00:27.880 YouTube
01:00:29.160 are
01:00:29.940 you
01:00:30.020 with
01:00:30.180 me
01:00:30.400 wow
01:00:31.900 I
01:00:32.220 ended
01:00:32.400 right
01:00:32.600 at
01:00:32.740 8
01:00:32.880 o'clock
01:00:33.200 too
01:00:33.480 amazing
01:00:35.540 all
01:00:36.820 right
01:00:37.020 we're
01:00:38.560 going to
01:00:38.660 do
01:00:38.780 ourselves
01:00:39.180 a
01:00:39.380 little
01:00:39.540 simultaneous
01:00:40.120 sip
01:00:40.920 this
01:00:41.900 one
01:00:42.180 for
01:00:42.520 such
01:00:42.820 a
01:00:42.960 good
01:00:43.100 job
01:00:43.500 now
01:00:44.260 I
01:00:44.400 tell
01:00:44.580 you
01:00:44.720 this
01:00:44.920 all
01:00:45.080 the
01:00:45.220 time
01:00:45.540 but
01:00:46.580 I
01:00:46.660 want
01:00:46.800 to
01:00:46.900 remind
01:00:47.220 you
01:00:47.440 I
01:00:48.500 only
01:00:48.860 get
01:00:49.120 to
01:00:49.300 do
01:00:49.460 what
01:00:49.660 I
01:00:49.840 do
01:00:50.140 to
01:00:51.180 the
01:00:51.340 extent
01:00:51.640 that
01:00:51.840 you
01:00:51.940 like
01:00:52.160 any
01:00:52.400 of
01:00:52.520 my
01:00:52.700 persuasion
01:00:53.380 or
01:00:53.680 affect
01:00:54.020 anything
01:00:54.340 I
01:00:54.820 only
01:00:55.040 get
01:00:55.220 to
01:00:55.340 be
01:00:55.500 persuasive
01:00:56.060 because
01:00:57.000 you
01:00:57.300 show
01:00:57.580 up
01:00:57.940 right
01:00:59.220 like
01:01:00.640 this
01:01:00.840 whole
01:01:01.020 thing
01:01:01.280 is
01:01:01.540 just
01:01:01.800 one
01:01:02.040 big
01:01:02.360 machine
01:01:03.280 and
01:01:04.460 I
01:01:04.620 get
01:01:04.820 most
01:01:05.360 of
01:01:05.500 the
01:01:05.600 attention
01:01:06.020 I'm
01:01:07.700 sort
01:01:07.880 of
01:01:07.960 like
01:01:08.200 the
01:01:10.060 key
01:01:10.420 that
01:01:10.620 starts
01:01:10.880 the
01:01:11.060 car
01:01:11.320 but
01:01:13.500 right
01:01:14.060 I'm
01:01:14.320 just
01:01:14.500 the
01:01:14.880 ignition
01:01:15.240 you're
01:01:16.200 the
01:01:16.340 car
01:01:16.620 so
01:01:18.160 what
01:01:18.740 you
01:01:19.000 do
01:01:19.420 is
01:01:20.480 100%
01:01:21.600 necessary
01:01:22.960 for
01:01:23.340 anything
01:01:23.800 I
01:01:24.060 do
01:01:24.300 that's
01:01:25.060 useful
01:01:25.360 and
01:01:27.180 to
01:01:27.740 that
01:01:28.060 I
01:01:28.840 salute
01:01:29.120 you
01:01:29.380 the
01:01:29.740 simultaneous
01:01:30.140 sip
01:01:30.460 is
01:01:30.800 for
01:01:31.040 you
01:01:31.320 go
01:01:32.120 was
01:01:39.580 that
01:01:39.820 good
01:01:40.240 oh
01:01:41.540 my
01:01:41.840 goodness
01:01:42.260 that
01:01:42.440 was
01:01:42.580 good
01:01:42.860 so
01:01:45.220 good
01:01:45.560 well
01:01:47.560 yesterday
01:01:47.940 I
01:01:48.240 gave
01:01:48.580 you
01:01:48.700 a
01:01:48.820 reframe
01:01:49.240 about
01:01:49.580 forgetting
01:01:50.100 your
01:01:50.640 history
01:01:51.480 and
01:01:51.720 your
01:01:51.880 past
01:01:52.360 and
01:01:52.780 the
01:01:52.960 feedback
01:01:53.240 I
01:01:53.540 got
01:01:53.700 from
01:01:53.880 that
01:01:54.100 both
01:01:54.520 during
01:01:54.900 and
01:01:55.240 afterwards
01:01:55.880 was
01:01:57.040 really
01:01:57.300 phenomenal
01:01:57.840 and
01:01:59.720 you know
01:02:01.220 I'm
01:02:01.320 writing a
01:02:01.720 book
01:02:01.880 right now
01:02:02.380 on
01:02:02.760 reframes
01:02:03.340 it will
01:02:03.560 include
01:02:03.840 that
01:02:04.040 one
01:02:04.200 and
01:02:04.560 so
01:02:04.680 I
01:02:04.820 took
01:02:05.060 yesterday's
01:02:06.300 presentation
01:02:07.440 and
01:02:08.240 essentially
01:02:08.740 wrote it
01:02:09.220 up
01:02:09.460 much
01:02:09.960 the
01:02:10.140 way
01:02:10.320 I
01:02:10.500 presented
01:02:11.020 it
01:02:11.280 because
01:02:11.540 I
01:02:11.680 thought
01:02:11.900 the
01:02:12.380 order
01:02:12.720 that
01:02:12.960 worked
01:02:13.200 out
01:02:13.360 really
01:02:13.600 well
01:02:13.860 so
01:02:15.100 so you'll
01:02:17.480 see that
01:02:17.780 in the
01:02:17.940 book
01:02:18.160 the
01:02:19.100 other
01:02:19.400 reframes
01:02:19.960 I think
01:02:20.340 are just
01:02:20.820 as
01:02:21.220 powerful
01:02:22.060 maybe
01:02:23.680 more
01:02:24.020 and
01:02:25.140 here's
01:02:25.480 the
01:02:25.860 proposition
01:02:26.320 let's
01:02:26.960 see if
01:02:27.180 this
01:02:27.340 would
01:02:27.500 sell
01:02:27.720 a
01:02:27.840 book
01:02:28.060 so
01:02:28.540 this
01:02:28.940 is
01:02:29.060 a
01:02:29.180 marketing
01:02:29.460 question
01:02:29.860 for you
01:02:30.180 right
01:02:30.380 so
01:02:30.940 it's
01:02:31.060 not
01:02:31.200 a
01:02:31.320 question
01:02:31.560 about
01:02:31.840 necessarily
01:02:32.700 what
01:02:32.920 you
01:02:33.140 will
01:02:33.320 do
01:02:33.520 so
01:02:33.940 it's
01:02:34.060 more
01:02:34.360 of
01:02:34.460 a
01:02:34.600 marketing
01:02:34.960 question
01:02:35.380 if
01:02:37.020 I
01:02:37.220 had
01:02:37.800 a
01:02:37.920 book
01:02:38.120 with
01:02:38.360 let's
01:02:38.580 say
01:02:38.720 85
01:02:39.260 reframes
01:02:40.280 and
01:02:41.680 they
01:02:42.020 apply
01:02:42.380 to
01:02:42.700 your
01:02:43.440 happiness
01:02:43.880 and
01:02:44.440 your
01:02:44.600 specific
01:02:45.120 modern
01:02:45.940 life
01:02:46.380 and
01:02:48.280 I
01:02:48.400 told
01:02:48.640 you
01:02:48.840 you
01:02:49.060 know
01:02:49.260 there
01:02:50.380 might
01:02:50.600 only
01:02:50.800 be
01:02:51.040 one
01:02:51.880 of
01:02:52.040 these
01:02:52.260 reframes
01:02:52.840 out of
01:02:53.120 85
01:02:53.460 that
01:02:55.320 will
01:02:55.600 have
01:02:56.240 an
01:02:56.380 impact
01:02:56.700 on
01:02:56.880 you
01:02:57.040 but
01:02:57.840 if
01:02:57.980 it
01:02:58.040 has
01:02:58.200 an
01:02:58.320 impact
01:02:58.600 it
01:02:58.720 will
01:02:58.800 just
01:02:59.000 change
01:02:59.260 your
01:02:59.400 life
01:02:59.660 would
01:03:00.960 you
01:03:01.080 buy
01:03:01.300 a
01:03:01.440 book
01:03:01.580 that
01:03:01.780 85
01:03:02.200 reframes
01:03:02.880 if
01:03:03.840 the
01:03:04.020 proposition
01:03:04.460 was
01:03:04.900 it's
01:03:05.520 only
01:03:05.680 going
01:03:05.820 to
01:03:05.880 take
01:03:06.040 one
01:03:06.240 of
01:03:06.360 these
01:03:06.500 to
01:03:06.680 change
01:03:06.980 your
01:03:07.120 life
01:03:07.360 and
01:03:07.540 I
01:03:07.720 guarantee
01:03:08.320 one
01:03:08.580 of
01:03:08.680 them
01:03:08.800 will
01:03:09.000 which
01:03:10.440 I
01:03:10.560 do
01:03:10.700 by
01:03:10.880 the
01:03:10.960 way
01:03:11.140 this
01:03:12.920 would
01:03:13.040 be
01:03:13.140 an
01:03:13.260 impossible
01:03:13.680 book
01:03:14.000 to
01:03:14.200 read
01:03:14.480 without
01:03:15.260 it
01:03:15.500 changing
01:03:15.760 your
01:03:15.980 life
01:03:16.220 I
01:03:17.820 don't
01:03:17.940 think
01:03:18.120 you
01:03:23.460 a
01:03:24.060 reframe
01:03:24.500 you
01:03:24.620 just
01:03:24.780 have
01:03:24.940 to
01:03:25.060 listen
01:03:25.300 to
01:03:25.540 it's
01:03:27.220 the
01:03:27.360 easiest
01:03:27.680 self
01:03:28.060 improvement
01:03:28.460 you
01:03:28.700 could
01:03:28.840 ever
01:03:29.040 have
01:03:29.340 most
01:03:30.320 self
01:03:30.600 improvement
01:03:31.000 is
01:03:31.260 bullshit
01:03:31.800 like
01:03:32.180 keep
01:03:32.940 a
01:03:33.100 diary
01:03:33.500 use
01:03:35.000 your
01:03:35.220 free
01:03:35.500 will
01:03:35.820 and
01:03:36.100 your
01:03:36.360 stick
01:03:40.000 to it
01:03:40.360 and stuff
01:03:41.040 like that
01:03:41.480 but
01:03:42.180 with
01:03:42.480 reframes
01:03:42.940 you
01:03:43.060 just
01:03:43.240 have
01:03:43.380 to
01:03:43.500 hear
01:03:43.680 it
01:03:43.920 you
01:03:45.240 basically
01:03:45.600 just
01:03:45.860 have
01:03:46.040 to
01:03:46.140 be
01:03:46.420 walking
01:03:47.600 by
01:03:48.060 and you
01:03:49.160 can get
01:03:49.440 all
01:03:49.680 the
01:03:49.840 benefits
01:03:50.160 you
01:03:50.360 just
01:03:50.520 have
01:03:50.660 to
01:03:50.740 hear
01:03:50.900 it
01:03:51.000 once
01:03:51.240 and
01:03:51.400 you
01:03:51.480 done
01:03:51.700 do
01:03:54.200 you
01:03:54.320 include
01:03:54.620 a
01:03:54.760 reframe
01:03:55.160 that
01:03:55.320 makes
01:03:55.520 your
01:03:55.700 IQ
01:03:56.000 185
01:03:57.020 weirdly
01:03:58.700 I
01:04:00.440 didn't
01:04:00.820 but I
01:04:01.120 did
01:04:01.260 that
01:04:01.440 reframe
01:04:01.900 so
01:04:03.800 you
01:04:04.000 think
01:04:04.220 you're
01:04:04.440 joking
01:04:04.700 but I'm
01:04:05.040 going
01:04:05.120 to
01:04:05.200 do
01:04:05.320 that
01:04:05.460 right
01:04:05.640 now
01:04:05.900 I'm
01:04:06.500 going
01:04:06.620 to
01:04:06.780 reframe
01:04:07.460 all
01:04:09.620 of
01:04:09.760 your
01:04:09.920 IQ
01:04:10.240 to
01:04:10.560 185
01:04:11.300 you
01:04:11.480 ready
01:04:11.680 if
01:04:14.960 you
01:04:15.080 start
01:04:15.340 with
01:04:15.540 your
01:04:15.800 basic
01:04:16.520 IQ
01:04:16.900 the
01:04:17.100 one
01:04:17.220 you
01:04:17.340 born
01:04:17.540 with
01:04:17.800 that's
01:04:18.140 probably
01:04:18.380 not
01:04:18.660 185
01:04:19.380 but
01:04:20.960 then
01:04:21.140 you
01:04:21.280 layer
01:04:21.540 on
01:04:21.820 education
01:04:22.440 if
01:04:24.120 you
01:04:24.200 add
01:04:24.320 some
01:04:24.500 education
01:04:25.000 to
01:04:25.900 your
01:04:26.040 natural
01:04:26.380 intelligence
01:04:26.900 don't
01:04:27.540 you
01:04:27.880 aren't
01:04:28.480 you
01:04:28.640 smarter
01:04:29.140 in a
01:04:29.900 practical
01:04:30.320 sense
01:04:30.800 not
01:04:31.560 your
01:04:31.740 IQ
01:04:32.020 but
01:04:33.480 in terms
01:04:33.820 of
01:04:33.980 dealing
01:04:34.220 with
01:04:34.440 the
01:04:34.560 world
01:04:34.780 you're
01:04:35.100 smarter
01:04:35.700 now
01:04:37.540 add
01:04:38.740 emotional
01:04:39.340 intelligence
01:04:40.140 to that
01:04:40.720 where you
01:04:41.780 can
01:04:41.980 forego
01:04:42.640 some
01:04:43.720 benefits
01:04:44.300 I'll
01:04:45.620 bet most
01:04:46.040 of you
01:04:46.280 have
01:04:46.480 that
01:04:46.760 I mean
01:04:47.920 you show
01:04:48.600 up here
01:04:49.020 almost
01:04:49.460 every day
01:04:49.900 at the
01:04:50.120 same
01:04:50.320 time
01:04:50.700 pretty
01:04:51.480 organized
01:04:52.080 right
01:04:52.720 most
01:04:53.320 of you
01:04:53.480 have
01:04:53.640 that
01:04:53.900 so
01:04:54.580 doesn't
01:04:55.060 that
01:04:55.220 make
01:04:55.440 you
01:04:55.700 operate
01:04:57.020 as though
01:04:57.560 you're
01:04:57.740 smarter
01:04:58.100 because
01:04:59.100 you'll
01:04:59.260 get
01:04:59.400 better
01:04:59.600 results
01:05:00.040 so
01:05:01.120 now
01:05:01.280 you've
01:05:01.440 got
01:05:01.520 your
01:05:01.640 natural
01:05:02.000 IQ
01:05:02.360 but
01:05:02.760 you've
01:05:03.100 boosted
01:05:03.540 it
01:05:03.680 by
01:05:03.940 what
01:05:04.360 you
01:05:04.480 learned
01:05:04.840 and
01:05:05.940 you've
01:05:06.160 boosted
01:05:06.500 it
01:05:06.600 again
01:05:06.880 because
01:05:07.140 you
01:05:07.300 have
01:05:07.420 natural
01:05:07.860 emotional
01:05:08.780 intelligence
01:05:09.540 so
01:05:09.960 those
01:05:10.620 operate
01:05:11.040 as
01:05:11.240 sort
01:05:11.400 of
01:05:11.480 a
01:05:11.600 total
01:05:11.880 so
01:05:12.580 now
01:05:12.800 let's
01:05:13.000 say
01:05:13.160 you
01:05:13.320 started
01:05:13.640 at
01:05:13.860 120
01:05:14.280 I'd
01:05:15.520 say
01:05:15.740 if
01:05:15.960 you
01:05:16.080 had
01:05:16.240 the
01:05:16.420 right
01:05:16.620 kind
01:05:16.840 of
01:05:16.940 education
01:05:17.460 and
01:05:18.340 you
01:05:18.440 had
01:05:18.580 emotional
01:05:19.020 intelligence
01:05:19.820 you'd
01:05:20.520 be
01:05:20.640 operating
01:05:21.220 like
01:05:21.520 somebody
01:05:21.900 at
01:05:22.080 140
01:05:22.580 now
01:05:24.760 add
01:05:26.340 a
01:05:26.480 talent
01:05:26.780 stack
01:05:27.220 and
01:05:28.340 systems
01:05:28.900 instead
01:05:29.300 of
01:05:29.440 goals
01:05:29.840 and
01:05:31.600 when
01:05:31.740 you
01:05:31.860 add
01:05:32.060 the
01:05:32.220 talent
01:05:32.520 stack
01:05:32.900 and
01:05:33.140 you
01:05:33.240 start
01:05:33.440 building
01:05:33.820 a
01:05:34.040 set
01:05:34.200 of
01:05:34.320 talents
01:05:34.640 that
01:05:34.840 work
01:05:35.100 well
01:05:35.340 with
01:05:35.520 each
01:05:35.700 other
01:05:35.900 that's
01:05:36.540 the
01:05:36.680 key
01:05:36.920 is
01:05:37.140 that
01:05:37.300 they're
01:05:37.760 additive
01:05:38.160 to
01:05:38.400 each
01:05:38.580 other
01:05:38.820 can
01:05:40.580 you
01:05:40.780 operate
01:05:41.380 like
01:05:42.100 somebody
01:05:42.460 with
01:05:42.680 an
01:05:42.800 IQ
01:05:43.040 of
01:05:43.300 185
01:05:44.180 yes
01:05:45.640 yes
01:05:46.920 you
01:05:47.080 can
01:05:47.320 your
01:05:48.000 functional
01:05:48.620 intelligence
01:05:49.180 will be
01:05:49.660 through
01:05:49.860 the
01:05:50.060 roof
01:05:50.320 if
01:05:51.740 you
01:05:51.920 add
01:05:52.180 the
01:05:52.320 right
01:05:52.480 kind
01:05:52.700 of
01:05:52.800 skills
01:05:53.080 together
01:05:53.480 right
01:05:54.920 what
01:05:55.860 is
01:05:56.260 Kanye's
01:05:58.740 like
01:05:59.540 natural
01:06:00.080 IQ
01:06:00.460 I don't
01:06:01.580 know
01:06:01.760 he looks
01:06:02.220 pretty
01:06:02.440 smart
01:06:02.760 right
01:06:03.820 I would
01:06:04.400 say
01:06:04.560 he's
01:06:04.760 probably
01:06:05.140 very
01:06:05.440 smart
01:06:05.740 but
01:06:06.920 then
01:06:07.080 you
01:06:07.220 put
01:06:07.440 on
01:06:07.600 top
01:06:07.820 of
01:06:07.940 that
01:06:08.200 all
01:06:09.380 of
01:06:09.520 the
01:06:09.640 other
01:06:09.920 skills
01:06:10.300 that
01:06:10.520 he's
01:06:10.800 put
01:06:11.020 in
01:06:11.180 his
01:06:11.340 stack
01:06:11.740 and
01:06:12.640 then
01:06:12.760 you
01:06:12.900 get
01:06:13.080 Kanye
01:06:13.380 he
01:06:14.420 operates
01:06:15.100 like
01:06:15.320 his
01:06:15.480 IQ
01:06:15.740 is
01:06:15.900 185
01:06:16.640 functionally
01:06:18.640 right
01:06:19.080 I would
01:06:21.300 argue
01:06:21.560 that
01:06:22.200 whatever
01:06:23.500 my
01:06:23.840 natural
01:06:24.220 IQ
01:06:24.500 is
01:06:24.940 that
01:06:26.060 I
01:06:26.260 have
01:06:26.400 assembled
01:06:26.820 a set
01:06:27.420 of
01:06:27.560 skills
01:06:28.000 persuasion
01:06:29.360 live
01:06:30.800 streaming
01:06:31.220 etc
01:06:31.600 that
01:06:32.420 makes
01:06:32.660 me
01:06:32.880 functionally
01:06:33.680 smarter
01:06:34.460 than
01:06:34.720 my
01:06:34.920 IQ
01:06:35.260 would
01:06:36.480 you
01:06:36.600 agree
01:06:36.840 would
01:06:37.680 you
01:06:37.780 agree
01:06:37.980 with
01:06:38.140 that
01:06:38.280 claim
01:06:38.700 that
01:06:39.700 I
01:06:39.860 operate
01:06:40.520 functionally
01:06:41.840 better
01:06:42.120 than
01:06:45.320 piled
01:06:45.700 now
01:06:46.600 I
01:06:46.700 said
01:06:46.920 for
01:06:47.060 example
01:06:47.400 that
01:06:47.640 if
01:06:47.760 you
01:06:47.880 want
01:06:48.040 to
01:06:48.140 know
01:06:48.280 the
01:06:48.460 future
01:06:48.860 the
01:06:49.980 two
01:06:50.220 skills
01:06:50.640 that
01:06:50.860 will
01:06:50.980 do
01:06:51.160 that
01:06:51.360 best
01:06:51.720 are
01:06:52.000 economics
01:06:52.760 follow
01:06:53.780 the
01:06:53.980 money
01:06:54.200 and
01:06:55.800 persuasion
01:06:56.740 part
01:06:57.060 of
01:06:57.180 psychology
01:06:57.720 psychology
01:06:58.740 in general
01:06:59.480 but
01:06:59.680 persuasion
01:07:00.180 specifically
01:07:00.740 if
01:07:01.340 you
01:07:01.480 know
01:07:01.660 persuasion
01:07:02.320 and
01:07:03.180 you
01:07:03.300 know
01:07:03.480 economics
01:07:04.040 and
01:07:04.240 business
01:07:04.660 you're
01:07:05.740 in
01:07:05.900 really
01:07:06.280 good
01:07:06.620 shape
01:07:07.040 to
01:07:07.300 know
01:07:07.480 what's
01:07:07.700 coming
01:07:07.920 next
01:07:08.380 and
01:07:09.380 I
01:07:09.480 know
01:07:09.660 those
01:07:09.900 two
01:07:10.060 things
01:07:10.420 those
01:07:11.320 are
01:07:11.420 my
01:07:11.600 two
01:07:11.780 strongest
01:07:12.140 categories
01:07:12.640 so
01:07:13.940 it's
01:07:14.660 not
01:07:14.840 an
01:07:14.980 accident
01:07:15.400 if
01:07:16.240 I
01:07:16.400 get
01:07:16.980 better
01:07:17.240 results
01:07:17.780 than
01:07:18.640 other
01:07:18.840 people
01:07:19.160 so
01:07:19.940 I
01:07:20.220 believe
01:07:20.520 that
01:07:20.740 I
01:07:20.920 get
01:07:21.080 better
01:07:21.360 results
01:07:21.780 than
01:07:21.980 people
01:07:22.320 who
01:07:22.580 have
01:07:22.720 my
01:07:22.920 same
01:07:23.260 organic
01:07:24.420 IQ
01:07:24.840 because
01:07:26.380 I
01:07:26.600 assembled
01:07:27.020 things
01:07:27.460 which
01:07:27.740 made
01:07:27.960 me
01:07:28.120 operate
01:07:28.520 higher
01:07:28.860 than
01:07:29.060 my
01:07:29.260 IQ
01:07:29.560 and
01:07:31.500 I
01:07:31.640 think
01:07:31.820 that
01:07:32.040 you
01:07:32.220 all
01:07:32.380 do
01:07:32.520 the
01:07:32.680 same
01:07:32.880 so
01:07:33.480 I
01:07:33.660 think
01:07:34.020 that
01:07:34.240 you
01:07:34.440 could
01:07:34.640 assemble
01:07:35.040 the
01:07:35.980 same
01:07:36.340 set
01:07:36.620 of
01:07:36.740 skills
01:07:37.120 largely
01:07:38.520 because
01:07:38.760 I'm
01:07:38.900 helping
01:07:39.180 teach
01:07:39.680 you
01:07:39.880 you
01:07:40.800 you
01:07:41.280 have
01:07:41.700 my
01:07:41.900 books
01:07:42.200 to
01:07:42.420 look
01:07:42.580 at
01:07:42.800 if
01:07:43.760 you
01:07:43.880 read
01:07:44.080 these
01:07:44.320 two
01:07:44.540 books
01:07:44.940 and
01:07:46.040 it
01:07:46.160 failed
01:07:46.340 almost
01:07:46.660 everything
01:07:47.020 is
01:07:47.160 still
01:07:47.360 when
01:07:47.540 big
01:07:47.880 your
01:07:48.580 personal
01:07:49.000 life
01:07:49.340 would
01:07:49.540 start
01:07:49.760 looking
01:07:50.020 like
01:07:50.280 you're
01:07:50.440 a
01:07:50.560 genius
01:07:50.920 and
01:07:51.540 if
01:07:51.640 you
01:07:51.740 read
01:07:52.100 win
01:07:52.660 bigly
01:07:53.040 you
01:07:54.100 would
01:07:54.240 learn
01:07:54.440 persuasion
01:07:55.100 and
01:07:56.140 your
01:07:56.300 effectiveness
01:07:56.800 in general
01:07:57.540 would
01:07:57.780 look
01:07:58.040 crazy
01:07:58.780 people
01:08:00.220 wouldn't
01:08:00.480 understand
01:08:00.920 why
01:08:01.200 you
01:08:01.400 were
01:08:01.520 getting
01:08:01.700 the
01:08:01.920 promotions
01:08:02.340 you
01:08:02.780 were
01:08:02.980 dating
01:08:03.860 above
01:08:04.200 your
01:08:04.520 station
01:08:05.300 and
01:08:05.480 everything
01:08:05.720 else
01:08:06.040 so
01:08:07.140 you
01:08:07.460 would
01:08:07.880 functionally
01:08:08.460 look
01:08:08.660 like
01:08:11.280 point
01:08:11.440 so
01:08:11.780 you
01:08:11.900 didn't
01:08:12.040 think
01:08:12.200 I
01:08:12.320 could
01:08:12.440 do
01:08:12.560 that
01:08:12.780 did
01:08:12.940 you
01:08:13.080 you
01:08:14.120 didn't
01:08:14.300 think
01:08:14.520 I
01:08:14.660 could
01:08:14.820 reframe
01:08:15.260 your
01:08:15.440 IQ
01:08:15.720 up
01:08:15.940 to
01:08:16.060 185
01:08:16.800 and
01:08:18.200 then
01:08:18.320 I
01:08:18.440 just
01:08:18.640 did
01:08:18.920 challenge
01:08:21.200 accepted
01:08:21.820 alright
01:08:22.700 that's
01:08:22.920 all for
01:08:23.180 today
01:08:23.480 YouTube
01:08:23.920 I'll
01:08:25.520 talk
01:08:25.680 to you
01:08:25.880 tomorrow