Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1893 Scott Adams： Declaring War On The Cartels, Tulsi Gabbard Quits Democrats & Schiff Lies

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization, the thing that

00:00:09.300 makes everything better in a hundred different ways, at least. I've counted them. Would you

00:00:15.460 like to take it up to a new level, an amazing level, a level that, I don't know, I don't

00:00:20.300 know if humans have ever even experienced this, but we're going to take it up now. And all you

00:00:25.520 need, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or gel. It's a dine, a canteen jug or

00:00:30.420 a flask of vessel of any kind. Wow, that's the best I've ever said that. Fill it with

00:00:35.600 your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the

00:00:41.000 dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous

00:00:44.340 sipping. It's going to happen right now. Go.

00:00:47.680 Oh, somebody's in the gym and can't sip now. We're not going to wait, but it's good that

00:01:00.360 you're in the gym. That's a very good thing to do at the same time that you are consuming

00:01:06.520 coffee with Scott Adams. Well, there's so much news today, I can hardly begin. Greta Thunberg

00:01:15.360 says that she thinks that Germany should keep its nuclear power plants on because the alternative

00:01:23.020 is burning coal. Why did it take Greta until now to say that? And the story went on to say

00:01:35.520 that she's feeling good and, you know, she's in a good place. Sort of mentally and emotionally,

00:01:40.680 she's in a good place now. I'm really happy that Greta destroyed planet Earth, but then

00:01:47.700 she's feeling good because that's why we do it, right? That's why you destroy the planet,

00:01:52.500 to feel a little better about yourself. And she is, and so that's good. On one hand, planet

00:01:57.940 Earth has been destroyed. On the other hand, Greta is feeling a little bit better about herself.

00:02:02.800 And I think that counts. You've got to balance out the positive and the minus. Honestly, I wonder

00:02:10.480 how she rationalizes this. Does she not look at the state of the world and know that that

00:02:19.920 was her? I mean, not all of it, but a big part. How does she not know her culpability in all

00:02:29.580 of this badness? I don't think that her brain can process that, right? In her mind, she'd

00:02:34.640 probably move things forward and then other people just do other things. All right. I've

00:02:44.320 heard some people say that one way to save the nuclear marriage is to make it harder to 0.58

00:02:50.080 get a divorce. How many of you think that's a good idea, to make it really, really hard

00:02:56.940 to get a divorce? Anybody think that's a good idea? That sounds like the advice you

00:03:05.060 give to people who have never been in a marriage where they wanted to get a divorce. I don't

00:03:10.740 think there's anybody who ever wanted a divorce who ever thought that was a good idea. So my

00:03:18.220 take is that there was a time in history when making it hard to get a divorce probably was 0.74

00:03:23.640 a good strategy because people didn't have a lot of options. You know, you married somebody

00:03:30.080 you knew. That's it. Well, I know somebody. I know the farmer's daughter next door, so I

00:03:38.160 guess I'll marry her. And I'm the only one she knows that's the right age, so I guess we'll

00:03:43.800 get married. I think in those days when people had very few options, maybe marriage was good

00:03:52.380 to lock in. But today, people are exposed to some of the alternatives. You know, they've

00:03:58.680 had a hundred lovers before they get married sometimes. All kinds of stuff. I just don't

00:04:04.320 think people's brains can be happy with one option for 60 years. I just don't think we're

00:04:11.880 that kind of people. It's unrealistic in terms of who we've become. It wasn't unrealistic in

00:04:18.220 the 1800s. In the 1800s, it might have been a survival necessity. But at the moment, we've

00:04:24.560 really changed in terms of what we've been exposed to and what we care about and, you

00:04:29.800 know, how specific our preferences are. So I don't know if that's the answer. I saw a tweet

00:04:37.280 by Joshua Lysak yesterday that kind of stuck with me. I saw it again today, so I thought

00:04:44.180 I'd share it. He was saying that he heard a podcaster saying the following thing the other

00:04:49.940 day. Quote, I can't get behind person A because they like to tweet from person B. That tells

00:04:56.160 me everything I need to know about person A, and none of it's good. And Joshua goes on to

00:05:02.040 say, imagine admitting you think this way in public. Imagine thinking that you know everything

00:05:13.240 about somebody based on who they tweeted. And I agree with Joshua so much on this point

00:05:20.280 because you've seen me make a point before that I sometimes, maybe once or twice a year,

00:05:25.840 I declare in public my right to associate with people you don't like aggressively. I'm not

00:05:34.260 just going to associate with people you condemn. I'm going to be all over them. I'm going to

00:05:40.880 slobber all over them. Because fuck you. I have no tolerance for people telling me who I

00:05:47.680 can and cannot associate with. No tolerance. There's no wiggle room there whatsoever. It's

00:05:53.780 like free speech, right? I mean, I'll give you shouting fire in the crowd at theater. But there's

00:05:59.880 some things you don't negotiate on. And I don't negotiate who I can talk to. I'm not going to

00:06:05.980 negotiate that. To prove my point, to prove that I will associate with people I don't even agree with,

00:06:15.140 I retweeted Aaron Rupar today, who was criticizing Sean Hannity. Yeah, I did that. I did that. I just,

00:06:27.220 I just retweeted Aaron Rupar because I agreed with his tweet. How do you feel about that?

00:06:35.060 Knowing my audience, if you know who he is, you're saying to yourself, what could he have possibly said

00:06:42.580 that you agreed with? Apparently, Hannity played an audio on his show of Joe Biden trying to

00:06:53.060 talk to Hunter about his drug addiction and saying that he didn't know what to do, but he loved him,

00:07:01.860 etc. Now, if you've heard about the video, but you haven't heard it, you don't know the story.

00:07:08.500 So that's the first thing you need to know. If you read that there was an audio, but you haven't

00:07:14.820 heard it, you really don't understand the story. The hearing, it changes everything, right? When you 0.99

00:07:21.620 hear the genuine concern and the genuine love and the genuine helplessness of that call,

00:07:32.180 he humanizes both of them. First of all, he humanizes them. So I feel much closer to both Joe Biden and to

00:07:43.860 Hunter Biden because of that call. Now, I have, you know, most of you know, I have some personal

00:07:49.780 connection to the topic of fentanyl. Not mine, but my stepson who passed away. So I really felt that.

00:08:02.580 And I asked myself, what was the point of Hannity running that? I didn't see the whole segment,

00:08:09.300 but was there any redeeming purpose of that? Because what I saw was a grotesque violation of privacy.

00:08:18.660 Just grotesque. Did you see something else? Did you see something that was newsworthy?

00:08:27.460 Because that was, because just reading about it and then listening to it and a context,

00:08:31.700 because remember, I saw it out of context. Was there any context that makes that okay?

00:08:35.380 Okay. Somebody says it's a war. Sorry. Not good enough. Yeah.

00:08:47.540 All right. Well, you got a little quiet on that one. So I'm going to back Aaron Rupar on this

00:08:53.460 against Hannity. And I don't really care what you think about it. Just in case, in case you wondered.

00:08:58.740 Here's the thing. I blame conservatives for the ongoing fentanyl problem. I blame conservatives.

00:09:13.460 Here's why. Because conservatives have a fantasy of what can be done about it. And I think Hannity

00:09:19.540 displayed that fantasy. I don't think Hannity would play that unless he believed that there was something

00:09:27.620 like having better character could have helped Hunter. Like if he tried harder or, you know, did the right

00:09:35.860 thing, he'd be better off. I feel like you wouldn't run that video. Now, this is mind reading, right?

00:09:43.780 But I feel, yeah, exactly. It's mind reading. But we don't have an alternate explanation of why you did it,

00:09:49.060 right? We're missing an alternate explanation, so we'd have to speculate. But it would be speculation.

00:09:55.860 Yeah. I don't know. This whole thing was super creepy to me and I didn't like it that one bit.

00:10:03.060 And I think that conservatives don't understand that addiction is not a choice. Do you get that?

00:10:09.540 How many of you understand that addiction is not a choice? I mean, there's certainly a choice when you

00:10:15.700 first got into it. That was a choice. But you know that once you're addicted, the choice goes away.

00:10:22.820 It's just a medical problem after that. So, all right. And then also conservatives think that

00:10:30.580 building a fence is going to stop fentanyl. Maybe five percent.

00:10:38.500 All right. So there's a group of former Trump officials, they're called. I'll name them in a second.

00:10:47.380 We're proposing that the U.S. declare war on Mexican cartels.

00:10:53.540 So that's a thing now. Who was the first person who told you we should declare war on the cartels?

00:11:01.220 Where have you heard that before? Yeah. Yeah, that was me. Do you know why these four people can say this out loud?

00:11:11.700 So the four people were named are Russ Vogt, Ken Cuccinelli, Cash Patel, and Mark Paoletta.

00:11:20.260 So it's a problem. They're proposing it so that they can shut down legal ports of entry

00:11:27.860 and if needed and basically give them a little more leverage.

00:11:34.420 Now, here's what I think I do for the country. I don't know for sure, but it looks like it.

00:11:42.020 Can you give me a sanity check on this? And usually when people say, give me a sanity check,

00:11:48.900 they don't mean it literally. This time, I actually mean it literally.

00:11:52.820 This is literally a sanity check. Am I crazy? Because it looks like this and another story I'm going to tell later.

00:12:03.540 It looks like I've been playing the role accidentally of the canary in the coal mine.

00:12:10.020 Meaning if I don't die, then somebody else can say it out loud.

00:12:14.180 And I believe I said out loud, we should attack militarily the cartels in Mexico, even if it requires occupying Mexico.

00:12:25.140 Whatever it takes. Now, did you notice that I didn't get canceled for saying that? Right?

00:12:32.900 Not only did I not get canceled, but I didn't get as much pushback as you would imagine I would get.

00:12:38.500 Did I? And then when the news came out that Trump had mentioned it in a private conversation when he was president,

00:12:48.180 he just floated the idea. And whoever told the story said that they dismissed it. Ah, dismissed it.

00:12:55.540 But it got in your head, didn't it? It was in your head.

00:12:59.500 Once you start thinking about it, wild ideas don't sound so wild anymore.

00:13:04.500 Everything's wild the first time you hear it, you know, if it's outside the box.

00:13:09.960 But I think that my talking about it made it easier for somebody else to talk about it.

00:13:16.420 Am I crazy? You tell me.

00:13:19.320 Am I crazy, or did I prove that you could say that in public and survive it?

00:13:23.220 I don't know. I mean, literally I can't tell.

00:13:30.240 Because I might be just imagining any kind of connection to this.

00:13:36.100 I don't know. Hard to know.

00:13:38.260 Anyway, I think that if they get this pushed through,

00:13:43.720 which, you know, the odds are against it,

00:13:45.800 but maybe if there's a Republican president someday, they will have more success.

00:13:50.500 But I think this would set the stage for a direct military attack on the cartels.

00:13:56.160 That's not why they say they're doing it.

00:13:59.240 They're not saying they're doing it for military direct action.

00:14:03.300 But that's what a war is.

00:14:05.180 If you declare it a war, you've effectively authorized military action.

00:14:11.900 So, good work on that, all the ones working on that.

00:14:15.720 Question, if the draft were ever reinstated in the United States,

00:14:24.360 and let's say the threat was one you didn't think was worthy of your time,

00:14:29.000 such as something like the Vietnam War,

00:14:31.780 where people of good conscience could say,

00:14:34.400 I don't think this is in our self-interest.

00:14:36.120 Would you ever consider, if you were male,

00:14:41.240 identifying as a woman so that you would not have to register for the draft?

00:14:45.780 Would anybody consider doing that?

00:14:48.540 Would you consider identifying as a woman so you don't get drafted?

00:14:53.360 Oh, I would.

00:14:55.200 I'd do that in a heartbeat.

00:14:57.160 Of course I would.

00:15:00.220 I wouldn't hesitate for a second.

00:15:02.700 Why?

00:15:03.140 Embrace and amplify, my friends.

00:15:06.980 Embrace and amplify.

00:15:09.280 Those are the rules.

00:15:11.140 I did not make up the rules.

00:15:13.920 Moreover, if you're applying for a college scholarship

00:15:18.140 or, let's say, a job at a corporation,

00:15:22.280 why would you identify as white?

00:15:25.240 Or a white male?

00:15:26.760 Why would you do that?

00:15:29.260 I suppose you might try a few times as a white male and see how it goes.

00:15:33.600 Maybe if you get your job, you're fine.

00:15:35.300 You might have a special talent or something.

00:15:37.780 But if you were competing with the rest of the world,

00:15:41.000 why would you identify as white if you don't have to? 0.60

00:15:44.360 The rules are very clear.

00:15:45.940 You can identify whatever you want.

00:15:47.980 So why would you identify as the one that gives you fewer rights

00:15:50.640 as an American citizen?

00:15:53.360 Effectively.

00:15:54.140 It would be crazy.

00:15:54.900 You know, a lot of people think that I joke

00:15:58.640 when I say I identify as black for the benefits. 0.98

00:16:03.220 That's not a joke.

00:16:04.980 I identify as black for the benefits. 0.88

00:16:07.540 And should people think I'm white

00:16:10.700 and give me some benefits for looking white,

00:16:14.720 I will take those benefits.

00:16:16.740 Thank you.

00:16:18.600 So I can get benefits both ways.

00:16:21.100 Why would you do it the other way?

00:16:23.100 Why would you identify in the way that gets you the least stuff?

00:16:27.480 I don't make the rules.

00:16:28.820 I just play them.

00:16:30.380 Right?

00:16:30.520 If it were illegal to identify as some other thing than how I feel,

00:16:36.240 then I wouldn't do it.

00:16:38.180 I'm big on following the law.

00:16:40.340 But if the law encourages me to identify in the way

00:16:43.820 that makes my life the most fulfilled and meaningful,

00:16:49.000 then I'm going to do it any time I want for any reason whatsoever

00:16:52.020 as long as there's a benefit.

00:16:54.200 So that's my take.

00:16:55.220 So Tulsi Gabbard has announced she's leaving the Democrat Party.

00:17:02.100 And here's what she says in her statement.

00:17:05.500 I can no longer remain in today's Democratic Party

00:17:07.880 that is now under the complete control

00:17:10.040 of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness.

00:17:15.600 It gets better.

00:17:17.460 Here's the money shot.

00:17:18.700 Who divide us by racializing every issue

00:17:22.840 and stoke anti-white racism

00:17:25.340 actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms.

00:17:29.960 And then she goes on.

00:17:33.280 Tulsi Gabbard actually said in public, out loud, full-throated,

00:17:39.820 that she's leaving the Democrat Party

00:17:42.000 because they're anti-white racists.

00:17:47.460 Got to stand up for that.

00:17:48.700 I'm standing ovation.

00:18:02.480 All right.

00:18:05.180 Now, here's my next question.

00:18:09.720 Did I make it safer for her to say that?

00:18:15.380 Have you been watching me for the last month?

00:18:18.700 I feel like I canaried that coal mine, did I not?

00:18:24.540 I feel like this is the second coal mine I canaried.

00:18:27.540 And I can't tell if there's any connection.

00:18:30.080 It feels like there's a connection, doesn't it?

00:18:32.800 But it could just be the zeitgeist.

00:18:34.560 It could, you know what the zeitgeist is?

00:18:38.320 The zeitgeist is this sort of non-scientific idea

00:18:43.480 that people suddenly reach the same conclusions

00:18:47.720 at about the same time in different places for their own reasons,

00:18:51.680 but there's something about society that made us all decide at the same time.

00:18:55.920 So I guess in some sense there's a scientific hypothesis, at least.

00:19:01.340 And it could be that.

00:19:02.760 It could be just everybody reached the same point at the same time.

00:19:07.600 But I think it helps to see somebody not get killed for saying it out loud.

00:19:13.760 And I hope I was useful.

00:19:19.520 But it's not something I can claim credit for.

00:19:23.800 Who's texting me?

00:19:26.200 Oh, good.

00:19:28.340 All right.

00:19:30.200 So that's really interesting.

00:19:31.780 Now, I think nobody's surprised that Tulsi had some problems with the Democrats.

00:19:39.880 But the fact that she left them stating anti-white racism as one of the key reasons,

00:19:47.320 that is one of the gutsiest things I've ever seen.

00:19:51.460 Have you ever seen anything that gutsy?

00:19:53.340 Like, what was the last thing you saw that was that brave?

00:19:58.760 I actually can't think of anything right now.

00:20:00.620 Well, yeah, Trump, maybe.

00:20:04.300 Kanye, maybe.

00:20:05.060 Yeah, okay, Kanye.

00:20:07.260 But, you know, here's the difference.

00:20:09.240 Kanye's an entertainer.

00:20:11.220 And provoking is his job.

00:20:13.980 He provokes for a living.

00:20:16.140 Where politicians are typically not that kind of thing.

00:20:19.900 Yeah, okay.

00:20:21.500 Yeah, maybe Matt Gase.

00:20:23.040 So there are a few people who have bucked the system.

00:20:30.620 I wonder if Kanye made a difference to Tulsi being able to say that out loud in a full-throated way.

00:20:44.380 I mean, where he goes, white lives matter. 0.97

00:20:46.360 I think maybe all of this is in the mix.

00:20:50.540 Here is the least surprising story of all time.

00:20:54.420 What would be the least surprising thing you could ever hear in the news?

00:20:59.300 Schiff lied.

00:21:01.960 Adam Schiff lied.

00:21:04.220 Or specifically, he's being accused of doctoring evidence of an email on January 6th.

00:21:12.080 Apparently, Schiff actually attributed a lawyer's email to Jordan, Representative Jordan.

00:21:22.540 Now, if you see an email that comes from a lawyer, clearly it's a whole different frame of reference than a politician.

00:21:31.800 So imagine how damning that would be, to imagine that the politician said what the lawyer said in confidence.

00:21:41.560 And that is messed up.

00:21:43.820 I mean, you don't even need to know the details, do you?

00:21:46.060 That is messed up.

00:21:48.440 And he also changed some of the words, apparently.

00:21:51.060 So I think the email was changed, and then the author of the email was changed.

00:21:56.520 And he presented this to the American public as part of the January 6th thing.

00:22:03.220 Now, do you think there will be any penalty for that?

00:22:09.180 Because I think not.

00:22:11.000 Because he's been getting away with it for now years, right?

00:22:14.340 He literally can just make stuff up, present it to the public, and there's no blowback at all.

00:22:19.780 It doesn't cost him anything.

00:22:24.040 It's amazing.

00:22:25.700 You know, and Mark Levin, and people are saying he should be disbarred.

00:22:30.340 Disbarred?

00:22:31.400 He should be impeached.

00:22:33.560 You can impeach House of Representatives, right?

00:22:37.680 Right?

00:22:38.660 Can somebody give me a fact check on that?

00:22:41.460 I'm seeing a no and a yes.

00:22:43.740 No, but similar.

00:22:44.540 There's some kind of sanctioning, censured thing.

00:22:48.600 You can be censured.

00:22:50.420 Censored?

00:22:50.980 Yes, censured, not censored.

00:22:53.780 Yeah.

00:22:54.160 Okay.

00:22:55.200 Well, Republicans are going to have no time to govern if they become the power.

00:23:01.700 They're just going to be having hearings about all these Democrats.

00:23:04.100 Rasmussen did a poll to see how much people trusted electronic voting machines.

00:23:11.260 What do you think, before I tell you the answer?

00:23:14.300 Do you think that an electronic voting machine is more or less secure than manual paper ballots?

00:23:21.400 Is a voting machine more or less secure?

00:23:24.740 More or less?

00:23:27.280 Same.

00:23:28.020 Less.

00:23:28.640 Less.

00:23:29.200 Less.

00:23:30.280 Depends.

00:23:31.140 Less.

00:23:32.880 Less.

00:23:33.820 So many of you do distrust voting machines.

00:23:37.560 Yeah.

00:23:39.760 I think it's six of one and half a dozen of the other.

00:23:44.420 Here's why.

00:23:45.100 I think your odds of getting caught, if you tried something with electronic machines, might

00:23:52.520 be a little higher under some circumstances.

00:23:55.260 It would depend who did it, right?

00:23:57.180 If it were some insider, maybe that's hard to catch, so that would be the biggest risk.

00:24:02.040 But maybe if some hacker got in, the insiders would catch it.

00:24:06.000 So, I don't know.

00:24:08.220 I don't think we know, but I can see why you could go either way.

00:24:12.160 But here's what the Rasmussen results were.

00:24:14.040 So, 39% of likely U.S. voters think electronic voting machines make it easier to cheat.

00:24:22.040 39%.

00:24:22.560 So, that's basically all the Republicans.

00:24:24.880 So, Republicans, I think, don't like electronic voting machines.

00:24:28.520 I forgot to look at the cross tab, so I'm just making that up.

00:24:32.700 I don't believe it's just Republicans, but probably primarily.

00:24:37.060 That's my guess.

00:24:37.700 All right.

00:24:39.360 Florida is now not recommending vaccines for males 18 to 39.

00:24:48.800 I thought we've known that for a while, haven't we?

00:24:53.340 Haven't we known that for a while?

00:24:55.640 And would you be surprised that a new study or some new information has come out?

00:25:00.000 Now, I have to warn you in advance, I'm going to get really mad at some of you.

00:25:06.360 Okay?

00:25:07.480 Not all of you.

00:25:08.980 But I'm going to get mad at some of you, because this is going to trigger you into mind-reading

00:25:13.140 and accusing me of shit I didn't do.

00:25:15.020 So, when you mind-read me and accuse me of some shit I didn't do, I'm going to go off on you.

00:25:20.960 Are you ready?

00:25:21.940 Because I know you will.

00:25:23.660 Right?

00:25:24.160 Because there's somebody in this group who's going to mind-read and then falsely accuse me of something.

00:25:29.740 Are you ready?

00:25:30.900 So, let's just do this, because I'm feeling a little aggressive today.

00:25:35.620 So, let's just fight this out.

00:25:37.320 So, apparently a Pfizer director has now admitted in public that they did not test the Pfizer vaccination for stopping the spread.

00:25:54.260 Whoa, wait, what?

00:25:58.460 Let me say it again, because you probably thought you heard it wrong.

00:26:01.420 Pfizer's vaccination, which was designed and marketed to stop the spread of COVID, according to a Pfizer director,

00:26:11.360 they did not test whether it works to stop the spread.

00:26:17.360 Does it feel like you're hearing me wrong or something?

00:26:21.500 Right?

00:26:23.000 So, they actually said that.

00:26:25.340 Do you believe that?

00:26:26.440 Do you believe that they did not test to see if a vaccination acts like a vaccination?

00:26:33.500 Do you think that they didn't test the primary purpose of it?

00:26:38.560 Well, Owen Gregorian on Twitter saw that tweet, and he tweets us,

00:26:47.540 even this is a lie.

00:26:49.640 Nobody develops a vaccine and does not test whether it stops transmission.

00:26:54.540 That is correct.

00:26:56.440 That is correct.

00:26:58.860 Nobody develops a vaccine and doesn't test to see if it stops transmission.

00:27:05.420 You can conclude from this, not with 100% certainty,

00:27:10.400 but anybody with business experience,

00:27:13.880 all of you who do not have big business experience,

00:27:18.360 stay quiet for a moment, okay?

00:27:20.780 So, just for a moment, I'm going to ask you,

00:27:22.600 only the people who have big business experience tell me what happened.

00:27:27.960 They did test to see if it spreads.

00:27:30.860 The initial information showed it didn't work,

00:27:33.960 so they stopped looking at it.

00:27:37.420 Tell me I'm wrong.

00:27:38.460 They, of course, tested it.

00:27:41.360 The initial information said it didn't work,

00:27:44.200 and now they're saying they never looked.

00:27:46.880 You know that's what happened.

00:27:50.260 Am I right?

00:27:51.600 And again, everybody with big company experience,

00:27:54.320 do you think they didn't test?

00:27:56.260 You think they didn't run any tests?

00:27:57.840 So, I feel bad because Owen Gregorian basically told me

00:28:07.040 what I should have seen immediately,

00:28:08.800 which is, of course they tested.

00:28:11.020 Of course they did.

00:28:13.340 Now, it's possible that this one director is just wrong or lying

00:28:17.500 or misspoke or something.

00:28:19.260 That's possible, too.

00:28:20.140 But, oh my God.

00:28:22.940 I mean, if this were true, which seems highly unlikely,

00:28:26.700 well, either way, somebody needs to go to jail, don't you think?

00:28:31.420 Based on what we've seen so far,

00:28:35.760 now, you know, of course everybody's innocent until proven guilty,

00:28:38.860 so I'm not accusing any specific person,

00:28:41.240 but what we've seen based on this

00:28:43.900 strongly suggests somebody needs to be in jail for a long time.

00:28:50.140 That won't happen.

00:28:54.460 I saw a tweet by David Maritosko

00:28:58.080 talking about lithium and Ukraine and Russia.

00:29:02.780 And David says that lithium oxide deposits in Ukraine

00:29:06.760 are more important to Russia than some people understand.

00:29:10.620 Because remember, the mystery about lithium

00:29:12.980 is that it's everywhere and also rare.

00:29:17.780 That's why we're all confused about it.

00:29:20.140 Because those two things are both true.

00:29:22.380 It's everywhere, like there are tons of countries

00:29:24.560 that have plenty of lithium, and it's rare.

00:29:28.280 Now, we know it's rare because the price of lithium

00:29:30.680 has gone up, I don't know, 10 times or something.

00:29:33.080 So the price is very clear that it's rare.

00:29:36.140 So how could it be everywhere and still be rare?

00:29:39.600 And the answer is it's hard to mine, apparently.

00:29:42.200 I don't know the details, but between the environmental catastrophe it causes

00:29:46.620 and, you know, how hard it would be to get it approved

00:29:50.780 and maybe even where it is, stuff like that.

00:29:53.740 So it must be just really hard to do.

00:29:56.000 So that's why there's a shortage.

00:29:58.580 But as David Maritosko points out,

00:30:00.740 and I didn't know this, this is good information,

00:30:03.960 Chinese companies have applied this year

00:30:05.660 for exploring and mining permits,

00:30:08.060 especially in Donetsk.

00:30:10.780 And Putin, this is again David saying,

00:30:12.980 Putin knows that if he doesn't get them,

00:30:15.560 meaning the rights to the lithium mining,

00:30:19.420 if Putin knows that if he doesn't get them,

00:30:22.700 China will. 0.98

00:30:23.240 So, no, I don't think lithium is the whole reason

00:30:29.420 for the Ukraine problem.

00:30:32.080 Because you've got the, you know,

00:30:33.660 the empire building, the history,

00:30:36.460 the, you know, the all kinds of reasons.

00:30:40.920 But I think lithium is one of them.

00:30:43.560 I think it's one of them.

00:30:49.500 So Europe is doomed.

00:30:53.240 According to Europe.

00:30:58.300 So there was a speech by a European Union top diplomat,

00:31:03.860 this guy, Joseph Borelli.

00:31:08.400 And he was talking about Europe,

00:31:11.600 and he said this,

00:31:13.420 that the Europe's security was provided

00:31:18.380 by the United States,

00:31:19.720 and their prosperity was provided

00:31:22.400 by cheap Russian energy

00:31:23.860 and Chinese goods.

00:31:27.340 And that that world doesn't exist anymore.

00:31:29.920 So that the world that made Europe successful

00:31:32.900 doesn't exist anymore.

00:31:36.000 Because they don't have the U.S. to keep them safe,

00:31:38.780 and they don't have Russian energy,

00:31:40.680 and they don't have cheap Chinese goods,

00:31:43.540 perhaps, in the future.

00:31:44.500 That's a pretty bold and dangerous,

00:31:49.560 but maybe true, statement.

00:31:53.720 I've never, yeah, just the way he framed that

00:31:56.420 is just, wow.

00:31:58.660 So, you know, I told you,

00:32:00.180 I'm writing a book on reframes.

00:32:02.680 How to take something that is a familiar situation

00:32:05.760 and just sort of twist it

00:32:07.620 so you can deal with it better.

00:32:11.220 This was kind of a shockingly,

00:32:13.680 it's like a slap in the face, isn't it?

00:32:15.880 Like, I read this, and I was like,

00:32:17.640 oh, maybe I have to worry about everything over there.

00:32:21.960 Like, they could be in serious trouble.

00:32:23.700 I don't think so.

00:32:25.100 I think that they will adjust.

00:32:26.620 You know, the Adams Law of Slow-Moving Disasters

00:32:29.360 suggests they'll find ways to protect themselves

00:32:32.140 and be prosperous.

00:32:33.860 But they might have a little,

00:32:35.040 might take them a little time.

00:32:40.760 So, Adam Schiff was also getting on in other news.

00:32:47.640 He was saying that Saudi Arabia is being bad

00:32:50.540 by, you know, not giving us more oil.

00:32:54.580 And that we shouldn't depend on Saudi Arabia

00:32:56.920 in the long term for our oil,

00:32:58.880 because, you know, that's a sketchy thing.

00:33:00.980 Now, let me ask you this.

00:33:05.580 You remember the Khashoggi thing, right? 0.98

00:33:09.120 So, Saudi Arabia, obviously,

00:33:11.460 murders Khashoggi, a critic,

00:33:14.180 and then cut him up with a bone saw

00:33:16.840 and carried him out in bags,

00:33:20.160 and then denied they did it.

00:33:22.420 And what does President Trump do?

00:33:25.500 He acts like he's taking their word for it.

00:33:28.320 And I say acts like,

00:33:30.480 because obviously he knew what happened.

00:33:32.580 So, Trump goes easy on Saudi Arabia,

00:33:35.040 and then what happened to Trump

00:33:36.100 for going easy on Saudi Arabia?

00:33:39.020 He got just killed for that.

00:33:42.860 He just ate shit for months and months.

00:33:46.600 The critics were just jamming poles up his butt

00:33:50.240 and slapping him in the head.

00:33:51.800 And he really took some abuse.

00:33:55.460 Do you know why he did that?

00:33:57.580 Why did he take all that abuse

00:33:59.260 and be contrarian to most of the rest of the world?

00:34:04.100 Because he wanted Saudi Arabia to owe him a favor.

00:34:09.280 Then why did he do that?

00:34:10.400 And soon after that,

00:34:15.300 he started to make the accords,

00:34:17.140 which required Saudi agreement.

00:34:20.200 Now, imagine if Trump were in power.

00:34:24.360 Saudi Arabia still owes him that favor,

00:34:27.400 because that one doesn't go away.

00:34:29.080 That favor does not go away,

00:34:31.280 because all it would take is Trump to say,

00:34:32.920 you know, maybe he did kill Khashoggi.

00:34:36.400 It would take one truth message from Trump saying,

00:34:42.960 you know, as I think about it,

00:34:45.000 maybe they did kill Khashoggi, right?

00:34:47.500 I mean, they still owe Trump for protecting Saudi Arabia,

00:34:51.840 the crown prince specifically.

00:34:54.940 I think if Trump had been president,

00:34:56.860 he would have gotten a different response

00:34:58.600 when asking the Saudis to pump more oil.

00:35:01.440 What do you think?

00:35:06.400 What do you think?

00:35:09.760 Yeah, Khashoggi was a mother,

00:35:11.700 you know, he wasn't necessarily a good guy.

00:35:15.920 So I'm not saying that Saudi Arabia didn't have a reason.

00:35:20.140 I'm just saying you shouldn't cut people up with bone saws.

00:35:24.800 All right.

00:35:25.340 I think it was 100% Biden's fault that Saudi Arabia said no,

00:35:30.720 because I think Trump would have gotten a yes.

00:35:32.920 We don't know.

00:35:34.200 There's no way to know.

00:35:35.340 But the situation is strongly suggestive

00:35:37.700 that Trump would have gotten a yes.

00:35:41.720 Don't know.

00:35:43.840 All right, ladies and gentlemen,

00:35:45.120 I feel like I forgot something important.

00:35:48.840 Is anything else happening today?

00:35:53.140 Oh, yes.

00:35:55.340 Why did I skip this for some reason?

00:35:59.020 So there's a new study out

00:36:00.280 that supports Florida's recommendation

00:36:05.540 to not vaccinate young men.

00:36:08.400 And the new report suggests

00:36:11.520 that it's dangerous for young men

00:36:15.380 to take the vaccination.

00:36:17.840 How long did it take people to rip up the new study?

00:36:21.920 About 10 seconds.

00:36:23.160 Do you all believe the new study

00:36:26.260 because it agrees with what you already believed

00:36:28.320 about myocarditis?

00:36:30.320 Of course you do.

00:36:31.800 Did you notice the study doesn't have a name on it?

00:36:36.860 I'm watching the internet,

00:36:38.640 and people absolutely bought this study,

00:36:42.280 absolutely bought into it.

00:36:43.780 And then somebody else in the comments says,

00:36:45.660 it doesn't even have a name on it.

00:36:47.460 It's not only not peer-reviewed,

00:36:51.200 but the person who wrote it

00:36:52.560 doesn't even want you to know who it is.

00:36:55.640 And apparently the sample group was small,

00:36:58.240 and there were other problems.

00:36:59.320 So I think we've reached a point

00:37:08.360 where we can say with complete confidence

00:37:11.540 there's no such thing as a scientific study on COVID

00:37:14.380 that we can believe.

00:37:17.980 How many would agree with that statement?

00:37:20.360 There's no such thing as a study.

00:37:22.440 And here's going to be the,

00:37:24.340 I'm not against science,

00:37:25.660 because remember science is not about one study.

00:37:29.320 So there's nothing I'm saying against science.

00:37:32.140 I'm saying that science requires lots of studies

00:37:35.200 because it's the lots of studies

00:37:37.320 that get some study to check the bad work

00:37:39.460 of the other study,

00:37:40.400 and then they fight it out.

00:37:41.740 Over time you get close to the truth.

00:37:44.500 But as soon as you say a study helped me,

00:37:47.660 well, you're not in science.

00:37:50.480 Science would say don't believe one study.

00:37:52.780 So I'm pro-science by saying don't believe that study.

00:37:57.980 Everybody agree with that?

00:37:59.720 So if I say don't believe the study

00:38:01.680 that says that the vaccination is dangerous,

00:38:04.340 don't believe it,

00:38:06.240 that's consistent with science.

00:38:08.800 And it doesn't matter what the study said.

00:38:11.180 Could have said it was good for you,

00:38:12.500 could have said it was bad for you,

00:38:13.600 could have been a good study,

00:38:14.600 could have been a bad study.

00:38:15.760 In all of those cases,

00:38:18.060 you should not believe it

00:38:19.640 because that's not how science works.

00:38:22.780 Science doesn't work by believing studies.

00:38:25.960 It's the opposite of that.

00:38:27.380 Actually, it would be closer to say

00:38:29.120 science is about doubting all of your studies.

00:38:32.240 How about that?

00:38:34.060 That kind of works for me.

00:38:35.660 When you say a good, quick definition of science

00:38:38.520 is doubting all of your information,

00:38:41.360 doubting all of your studies all the time,

00:38:43.480 because it's the doubting

00:38:44.840 that allows you to crawl forward.

00:38:47.040 It's not the believing.

00:38:48.160 So it's the doubting

00:38:50.620 that's the active part of science,

00:38:51.960 not the believing part.

00:38:54.660 But I think that's a good way to say it.

00:38:58.360 All right.

00:38:59.500 Ladies and gentlemen,

00:39:01.780 do you feel something's changing?

00:39:05.800 Do you feel like there's just something

00:39:07.800 big-ish changing in the world,

00:39:10.960 and you can't quite put your finger on it?

00:39:13.140 That's what it feels like to me.

00:39:16.980 Yeah.

00:39:17.220 I feel like until the pandemic,

00:39:20.040 every year was sort of a reasonable projection

00:39:23.340 from the year before.

00:39:25.540 You know what I mean?

00:39:27.560 Like, you know, it wasn't 1996

00:39:29.880 pretty close to 1995.

00:39:33.020 It didn't seem that different to me

00:39:34.600 if you were around then.

00:39:36.220 But this year doesn't feel like anything.

00:39:43.360 There's nothing about this year

00:39:45.100 that I can identify with any prior experience.

00:39:49.000 And I've been around a while, right?

00:39:52.680 And remember when...

00:39:54.900 Is it true Trump is back on Twitter?

00:39:58.760 Are you seeing a rumor about that?

00:40:00.540 There's no...

00:40:01.220 If Trump were back on Twitter,

00:40:03.520 my entire feed would be lighting up right now.

00:40:06.040 So I'm going to say that's not true

00:40:07.600 because there's no way

00:40:09.360 that only one person would be asking about it.

00:40:11.960 So I'm guessing that's not true.

00:40:15.520 But I imagine it would be.

00:40:17.020 I imagine it would be

00:40:18.080 if in the moment that the sale is completed,

00:40:22.120 if it is.

00:40:24.520 Are there fake Trump accounts?

00:40:26.280 Probably fake accounts.

00:40:29.580 I see repeated comments

00:40:31.960 that Cernovich retweeted a DeSantis ad

00:40:34.460 that switched you from Trump to DeSantis.

00:40:38.600 Eh.

00:40:39.740 Yeah.

00:40:40.780 You know, I don't think it matters

00:40:42.500 that X number of voters

00:40:44.900 would prefer DeSantis over Trump.

00:40:47.480 How will that ever matter?

00:40:49.520 The only thing that matters

00:40:50.300 is whether Trump is running.

00:40:52.160 If he runs,

00:40:54.600 he'll get nominated.

00:40:55.240 All right.

00:41:00.600 So what feels different

00:41:01.900 is that this is the first time

00:41:03.900 we all understand

00:41:04.780 we can't believe our experts

00:41:06.100 and our science.

00:41:08.480 I believe that we used to walk around

00:41:10.620 in a zombie-like fog of hypnosis

00:41:14.940 in which we thought

00:41:16.580 that when the experts told us something,

00:41:18.100 it was probably true.

00:41:19.540 And when the government told us something,

00:41:21.180 it was probably true.

00:41:22.140 I mean, sometimes not,

00:41:24.500 but probably true.

00:41:25.960 And when the science said,

00:41:27.560 here's our new study,

00:41:28.400 we would say to ourselves,

00:41:29.620 well, it could be wrong.

00:41:31.540 Could be.

00:41:32.400 But probably true.

00:41:34.020 Now what do you say?

00:41:35.700 Probably not true.

00:41:37.480 If I see a scientific study,

00:41:39.300 I say probably not true.

00:41:41.040 At least two-thirds not true.

00:41:43.080 I don't know if that's actually

00:41:44.500 a good number.

00:41:45.300 It just feels like that.

00:41:46.780 And if I see the government

00:41:48.100 say anything,

00:41:49.780 I say not true.

00:41:51.060 It doesn't matter which side.

00:41:53.320 It doesn't matter

00:41:53.740 if it's Democrat or Republican.

00:41:55.400 I just automatically say,

00:41:56.840 oh, you're leaving out context.

00:41:58.000 It's not true.

00:41:59.400 So what do you do

00:42:00.360 in a world where

00:42:00.920 you don't believe anything?

00:42:03.080 You have to rely on your systems.

00:42:06.020 You have to hope

00:42:06.820 that your systems get you through

00:42:08.220 because our brains

00:42:09.700 are not capable

00:42:10.480 of navigating

00:42:11.400 our current situation.

00:42:12.960 But our systems might.

00:42:14.880 So one of the systems

00:42:15.840 is the election system.

00:42:17.780 And I'm going to make

00:42:18.600 this point again

00:42:19.540 because this is such

00:42:21.540 a good build-up to it.

00:42:23.280 The point of an election

00:42:24.580 is not to pick

00:42:25.380 the best person.

00:42:27.220 That is an illusion.

00:42:29.540 The point of the election

00:42:30.840 is to be able

00:42:31.560 to move forward.

00:42:34.100 That's the point.

00:42:35.400 Especially when you have

00:42:36.280 elections that end up

00:42:37.120 being close.

00:42:38.460 You know,

00:42:38.700 if somebody's winning,

00:42:39.620 you know,

00:42:40.900 52 to 48,

00:42:42.260 that means the public

00:42:44.320 didn't really know

00:42:45.240 who was going to do

00:42:45.920 the best job.

00:42:47.340 That's a jump ball.

00:42:49.080 And that's what

00:42:49.540 most of our elections are.

00:42:51.140 It's the public

00:42:51.760 not really knowing

00:42:52.620 who would do the best job.

00:42:54.140 They might have

00:42:54.680 some preferences

00:42:55.340 of some policies,

00:42:56.620 but they don't know

00:42:57.240 who's going to pull it off

00:42:58.560 overall,

00:43:00.200 the best job.

00:43:00.840 They don't know.

00:43:01.800 But we do know

00:43:02.880 we need to move on.

00:43:05.000 We can't have a dictator,

00:43:06.140 so we need to get

00:43:06.700 a new president.

00:43:07.680 Our system

00:43:08.420 compensates for

00:43:10.180 a complete inability

00:43:11.200 to reason.

00:43:13.060 And that's what

00:43:13.520 a good system does.

00:43:15.060 Total inability

00:43:15.920 to reason.

00:43:19.020 Tulsi is setting up

00:43:20.100 to be Trump's VP.

00:43:22.140 That's what it looked

00:43:23.040 like, didn't it?

00:43:24.420 It looked like that,

00:43:25.560 didn't it?

00:43:27.200 How much would

00:43:28.180 Trump love

00:43:29.300 Tulsi Gabbard

00:43:31.560 as a VP?

00:43:34.540 I think he'd love it,

00:43:36.000 wouldn't he?

00:43:38.020 Because both of them

00:43:39.100 would have been

00:43:39.620 Democrats who became

00:43:40.720 Republicans.

00:43:42.160 Boom.

00:43:44.420 Trump always says,

00:43:46.060 and you know,

00:43:46.800 this is one of the things

00:43:47.580 I always appreciated

00:43:48.780 about Trump's honesty.

00:43:50.440 Even when he says

00:43:51.400 things that make you

00:43:52.520 cringe,

00:43:53.720 if they're honest,

00:43:55.360 you're still like,

00:43:56.400 okay,

00:43:57.500 at least it was honest.

00:43:58.900 And one of the things

00:43:59.580 he always says

00:44:00.780 that makes most of us

00:44:02.160 cringe,

00:44:03.100 but is honest,

00:44:05.080 is that looks matter.

00:44:06.340 And I know that he

00:44:08.840 would say something

00:44:09.500 about Tulsi being

00:44:11.700 attractive.

00:44:12.820 Because it matters.

00:44:14.240 It does matter.

00:44:15.460 And he likes that

00:44:16.300 central casting

00:44:17.360 kind of thing.

00:44:18.520 It's kind of perfect.

00:44:23.140 Have you tried

00:44:23.640 the Gary Payton

00:44:24.660 strain of weed?

00:44:26.080 I haven't,

00:44:26.680 but it sounds good.

00:44:27.340 She didn't say

00:44:31.440 a party affiliation,

00:44:32.440 that's right.

00:44:33.080 So there's no indication

00:44:34.540 that Tulsi would be

00:44:35.460 a Republican.

00:44:36.540 But there's also

00:44:37.460 no indication

00:44:38.620 that she's rejecting it.

00:44:40.160 One assumes

00:44:41.660 that she's independent.

00:44:43.840 But would there be

00:44:44.800 any reason

00:44:46.040 an independent

00:44:47.500 couldn't be

00:44:48.140 his VP choice?

00:44:50.980 I imagine

00:44:51.780 that would be

00:44:52.160 a problem,

00:44:52.840 but not legally.

00:44:54.320 It wouldn't be

00:44:54.700 a legal problem.

00:44:58.480 Her progressive

00:44:59.540 gun grab rules

00:45:00.800 are out for

00:45:01.360 a Republican ticket.

00:45:02.500 No.

00:45:03.860 No.

00:45:05.280 Not as Vice President.

00:45:07.400 See,

00:45:07.920 that's the magic

00:45:08.800 of Vice President.

00:45:10.160 The Vice President

00:45:10.920 doesn't have to have

00:45:11.620 the same policies

00:45:12.420 exactly as the President.

00:45:14.500 As long as Trump

00:45:15.740 has a policy

00:45:17.200 you're okay with,

00:45:18.340 it'll be like

00:45:19.700 Pence.

00:45:20.680 Pence had some

00:45:21.460 opinions that did

00:45:22.240 not agree with Trump.

00:45:24.060 But as Vice President,

00:45:25.120 he was a great

00:45:25.600 Vice President,

00:45:26.280 in my opinion.

00:45:28.000 I think Pence

00:45:29.360 will never get

00:45:30.040 the credit he deserves

00:45:31.140 for being a great

00:45:31.960 Vice President.

00:45:33.320 I just don't want

00:45:34.040 him to be President.

00:45:36.940 Yeah.

00:45:37.500 One of the great ones.

00:45:38.540 And he was great

00:45:39.240 because of the

00:45:39.760 problems he didn't

00:45:40.520 make.

00:45:42.700 His unforced errors

00:45:45.200 were close to zero.

00:45:47.680 I mean,

00:45:47.900 I don't know how

00:45:48.300 you do that

00:45:48.720 for four years

00:45:49.460 when everybody's

00:45:50.720 watching.

00:45:53.440 Yeah,

00:45:53.640 the VPs

00:45:54.100 can become

00:45:54.700 President,

00:45:56.020 but I think

00:45:56.920 that she would

00:45:58.320 know that

00:45:58.920 to get

00:45:59.940 continued support

00:46:00.900 from her own

00:46:01.480 base,

00:46:01.800 she'd have to be

00:46:02.360 compatible with

00:46:02.980 the base

00:46:03.320 or convince you

00:46:05.120 to change your

00:46:05.620 mind.

00:46:05.880 I doubt

00:46:06.820 that's going

00:46:07.220 to happen.

00:46:09.640 Yeah.

00:46:10.080 Yeah,

00:46:10.480 it's not a big

00:46:10.980 problem if they're

00:46:11.640 not exactly

00:46:12.280 policy aligned.

00:46:14.280 They could be

00:46:15.180 90% and that's

00:46:16.360 good enough.

00:46:21.280 DeSantis is a

00:46:22.140 better choice.

00:46:22.900 DeSantis is not

00:46:23.840 a better choice

00:46:24.420 for a VP.

00:46:26.260 How many think

00:46:27.140 DeSantis is a

00:46:28.320 good choice

00:46:28.780 for a VP?

00:46:29.240 To me,

00:46:30.420 that's the worst

00:46:30.900 idea.

00:46:33.260 Yeah.

00:46:33.840 You never pick

00:46:35.120 a VP that

00:46:36.040 the public

00:46:36.720 will say,

00:46:37.840 you know,

00:46:38.780 I'm just

00:46:40.760 saying,

00:46:41.640 if you reverse

00:46:42.960 that party,

00:46:44.380 if you put

00:46:46.000 DeSantis at

00:46:46.700 the top,

00:46:47.320 you don't want

00:46:47.920 to have that

00:46:48.380 conversation

00:46:49.060 even once.

00:46:50.800 But,

00:46:51.620 imagine

00:46:52.520 Tulsi Gabbard

00:46:54.760 being a

00:46:55.340 vice president

00:46:55.860 for Trump,

00:46:56.960 hypothetically.

00:46:58.400 Would you

00:46:58.880 say to yourself

00:46:59.480 automatically,

00:47:01.040 I think Tulsi

00:47:01.760 should be the

00:47:02.600 actual president

00:47:03.480 candidate?

00:47:04.700 Probably not.

00:47:06.460 Probably not.

00:47:08.440 Some would.

00:47:09.560 Some would,

00:47:10.260 but it wouldn't

00:47:10.620 be a big

00:47:11.140 conversation,

00:47:11.920 would it?

00:47:12.780 I don't think

00:47:13.420 it would be

00:47:13.700 a big conversation.

00:47:15.540 It would be,

00:47:16.000 you know,

00:47:16.440 something you'd

00:47:17.440 yak about.

00:47:19.540 All right.

00:47:21.100 I think that's

00:47:21.840 a good situation.

00:47:23.780 That's a good

00:47:24.460 situation.

00:47:24.900 If Tulsi is

00:47:29.980 VP,

00:47:30.440 what happens

00:47:30.900 next time?

00:47:31.900 Well,

00:47:32.280 VPs don't 0.57

00:47:33.440 usually become

00:47:34.120 president,

00:47:34.620 do they?

00:47:36.860 Isn't it?

00:47:38.380 How often

00:47:39.140 does a VP

00:47:39.680 become a

00:47:40.260 president?

00:47:40.920 One in four?

00:47:42.780 One in four,

00:47:43.680 maybe?

00:47:44.660 What's the

00:47:45.100 ratio?

00:47:45.500 of vice

00:47:48.960 presidents

00:47:49.380 becoming

00:47:49.760 presidents?

00:47:50.640 Yeah,

00:47:50.820 so there's

00:47:51.160 Bush Sr.

00:47:55.760 What was

00:47:56.520 the one

00:47:56.780 before Bush

00:47:57.540 Sr.?

00:47:59.160 Four,

00:47:59.760 that's a

00:48:00.160 special case.

00:48:03.120 Well,

00:48:03.820 Biden's,

00:48:04.600 I don't

00:48:05.020 know.

00:48:06.840 Biden's a

00:48:07.480 special case

00:48:08.100 too.

00:48:08.940 Johnson,

00:48:09.960 Johnson's a 0.93

00:48:10.680 special case.

00:48:13.920 Okay.

00:48:14.440 Yeah,

00:48:15.400 so it

00:48:15.640 seems like

00:48:16.020 it's more

00:48:16.340 of a

00:48:16.580 special case

00:48:17.340 situation

00:48:18.060 where

00:48:18.340 something

00:48:18.620 happens

00:48:19.020 to the

00:48:19.340 president.

00:48:21.520 Yeah.

00:48:22.680 I don't

00:48:23.480 think you

00:48:23.820 want somebody

00:48:24.380 as strong

00:48:24.800 as DeSantis

00:48:25.360 in the

00:48:25.760 VP spot.

00:48:27.400 You do

00:48:28.060 not.

00:48:29.780 Now,

00:48:30.120 suppose you

00:48:31.140 had DeSantis

00:48:31.700 as chief

00:48:32.380 of staff.

00:48:34.460 How about

00:48:35.080 that?

00:48:36.180 What if

00:48:36.760 DeSantis

00:48:37.260 were chief

00:48:37.920 of staff?

00:48:42.840 That.

00:48:43.320 I don't

00:48:44.440 think he

00:48:44.700 would take

00:48:44.980 that job,

00:48:46.380 but that

00:48:47.120 would be

00:48:47.900 kind of

00:48:48.200 amazing.

00:48:48.920 I can't

00:48:49.320 see him

00:48:49.520 taking that

00:48:49.880 job.

00:48:50.020 He's more

00:48:50.340 of a

00:48:50.560 leader than

00:48:51.060 a chief

00:48:51.900 of staff

00:48:52.260 guy.

00:48:52.720 I think

00:48:53.000 he needs

00:48:53.300 to be

00:48:53.500 a leader.

00:48:55.000 It would

00:48:55.220 be a

00:48:55.400 strong package.

00:48:58.920 Well,

00:48:59.380 Trump can't

00:48:59.940 share the

00:49:00.380 limelight.

00:49:00.900 That's why

00:49:01.220 a chief

00:49:01.580 of staff

00:49:02.000 would be

00:49:02.620 potentially

00:49:03.600 a good

00:49:03.940 way,

00:49:04.240 because the

00:49:05.040 chief of

00:49:05.360 staff doesn't

00:49:05.800 get that

00:49:06.240 much attention.

00:49:06.840 chief of

00:49:14.140 staff is

00:49:14.660 a leader

00:49:15.120 behind the

00:49:16.520 scenes,

00:49:17.100 but not a

00:49:18.080 leader that

00:49:18.500 the public

00:49:18.980 recognizes,

00:49:20.600 unless they

00:49:21.280 really pay

00:49:21.660 attention.

00:49:24.840 All right,

00:49:25.660 that's all for

00:49:26.260 now.

00:49:27.600 YouTube,

00:49:28.100 I'll talk to

00:49:28.520 you later.

00:49:29.460 Bye.

00:49:29.740 Bye.

00:49:29.800 Bye.

00:49:29.840 Bye.

00:49:29.860 Bye.

00:49:29.880 Bye.

00:49:29.900 Bye.

00:49:29.920 Bye.

00:49:29.940 Bye.

00:49:29.960 Bye.

00:49:29.980 Bye.

00:49:30.000 Bye.

00:49:30.020 Bye.

00:49:31.920 Bye.

00:49:33.920 Bye.

00:49:33.940 Bye.

00:49:33.960 Bye.

00:49:33.980 Bye.

00:49:34.020 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 11, 2022

Episode 1893 Scott Adams： Declaring War On The Cartels, Tulsi Gabbard Quits Democrats & Schiff Lies

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript