Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1899 Scott Adams： Ye Buys Parler, I Try To Get Canceled Again, And A Peace Plan For Ukraine

00:00:00.000 La-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da. 0.98

00:00:04.020 Good morning, everybody.

00:00:06.540 Welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the finest experience anybody's ever had.

00:00:12.820 Yes, today, yes, today, today will be another peak experience,

00:00:20.480 and all you need to take it to its maximum potential is

00:00:23.760 a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stir-steine, a canteen jug or flask,

00:00:27.560 a vessel of any kind.

00:00:30.900 Fill it with your favorite liquid, I like coffee,

00:00:33.480 and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine the other day

00:00:36.320 thing that makes everything better.

00:00:39.680 It's called Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:42.080 It happens now.

00:00:43.240 Go.

00:00:52.960 Savor it.

00:00:55.000 Savor it.

00:00:56.560 That's good.

00:00:58.320 Well, let's start with the fake news of the day.

00:01:02.000 Fake news of the day.

00:01:03.920 Fake news of the day.

00:01:06.540 Did you see the story that Mark Wahlberg is moving out of California?

00:01:11.960 So he's going to move out of L.A. and move to, he hopes, Nevada.

00:01:18.160 Now, how did the news cover that story?

00:01:20.700 Did it cover it like he wants to get out of California because California is a hellhole?

00:01:29.980 Sort of.

00:01:30.640 That's how they covered it.

00:01:31.760 Because that's the narrative, right?

00:01:33.460 The narrative is people moving out of California because California is a hellhole.

00:01:38.640 Do you know why Mark Wahlberg is moving out of California?

00:01:42.000 Well, I don't know either, but I did watch a special of his just recently in which he said

00:01:49.740 it had something to do with tax benefits for building a facility.

00:01:54.040 Yeah, there was some kind of, it looked like he was negotiating with somebody in Nevada

00:02:01.640 that he would build some kind of a facility, maybe a studio, like a new studio or something.

00:02:08.560 But he's waiting for tax breaks to do it.

00:02:13.740 So really, it's pretty much just a business decision.

00:02:19.220 I finally figured something out that I've been wondering about for a long time.

00:02:24.400 Have you noticed how often people will become famous in one thing and then they just can't

00:02:30.760 leave it alone?

00:02:31.360 They try to be successful in a different realm and people get real upset about it.

00:02:40.920 Why is it, why, why do people who make it in one realm try to succeed in a different realm?

00:02:48.780 Because you've seen me try to do it as well.

00:02:50.880 Why do we do that?

00:02:52.700 Why do people try to do that?

00:02:55.000 Why would you leave your lane?

00:02:56.360 I'll tell you, I'll tell you in my situation, I had to find out what my limits were.

00:03:06.120 I didn't know if I had limits because when Dilbert started working out, everything worked.

00:03:11.040 Like I wrote a book and it was the number one bestseller.

00:03:14.320 You know, just everything was working.

00:03:17.120 You know, I won the cartoonist, you know, top award for cartooning.

00:03:21.420 So for a while there, everything I did not only worked, but it worked great.

00:03:28.960 And I wondered, now you say hubris and you're completely wrong, right?

00:03:36.480 So your point would be the opposite of my point.

00:03:40.120 So your point is the traditional point, that the people succeed at one thing and then they

00:03:45.500 get full of themselves and say, oh, I'll bet I can succeed at everything.

00:03:49.760 I'm not saying that.

00:03:51.420 Very different.

00:03:53.020 I'm saying that I actually didn't know what my limits were, so I had to find out.

00:03:59.020 Imagine if you thought you had a superpower, but you didn't know how much of a superpower.

00:04:04.860 Isn't that the first thing you'd have to find out?

00:04:07.540 You'd have to find out.

00:04:09.220 Like, what else can I do?

00:04:12.180 I don't know.

00:04:13.280 I don't know what else I can do.

00:04:14.600 The only way you can find out is to try it.

00:04:18.260 So I'll tell you what I learned.

00:04:20.440 I learned that I'm a terrible business owner.

00:04:26.280 Just terrible.

00:04:27.780 Just awful.

00:04:29.540 And there's, you know, I'm very good at being an entrepreneur for myself.

00:04:33.460 So if I'm completely in charge of, you know, the thing that makes money, then I'm fine.

00:04:40.180 But I can't manage people.

00:04:43.260 I can't do it.

00:04:44.180 And I think the reason is I can't buy into the level of evil that it takes to do it.

00:04:51.520 Because managing people usually means getting them to do something very unpleasant for them so that you will have a payoff.

00:04:58.680 I don't know.

00:05:00.980 I just can't get there.

00:05:01.860 I don't know how to abuse other people for my benefit.

00:05:05.960 So I can never be a good business owner because you have to manage people.

00:05:10.620 Anyway, then secondly, why is it that people, this is my other realization, why is it that people get mad when people leave their lane?

00:05:21.560 Such as Elon Musk talking about Ukraine.

00:05:25.400 Why do people get mad when people do it?

00:05:28.640 I have a theory here.

00:05:31.040 Jealousy is not quite right.

00:05:34.520 Not envy and not jealousy.

00:05:36.140 But you're in the right ballpark.

00:05:40.040 All right, here's my spin on it.

00:05:43.060 Most of the people who complain about somebody leaving their lane have a certain quality about themselves.

00:05:50.340 What is it?

00:05:52.080 It's not everybody who complains.

00:05:54.360 Does everybody complain when Elon Musk tries to do something outside of his expertise?

00:06:00.420 No, not everybody.

00:06:01.880 No, it's not a liberal.

00:06:02.800 It has nothing to do with liberal Republican.

00:06:06.140 Nothing.

00:06:07.100 So it's not political.

00:06:09.080 At least that's not where I'm going.

00:06:11.160 Some of it's political, but that's not where I'm going.

00:06:13.960 It's not a lack of confidence.

00:06:16.660 Here's what it is.

00:06:18.400 If you are a person who believes you are capable, let's say you did well in school, you went to college, you got a good degree, you look good, you wear a suit, you got your hair,

00:06:29.920 whatever you think, whatever you think makes you look like you should succeed, and you're not succeeding as much as you thought you should.

00:06:38.640 I think it's how people explain, it's how they explain why they're not more successful.

00:06:47.760 Bear with me.

00:06:48.680 If everybody who succeeded is succeeding in exactly one field and could never leave their field, what would you be able to say about yourself if you had done everything right but you had not really succeeded?

00:07:01.920 What would you say about yourself?

00:07:06.140 You would say you didn't get lucky.

00:07:08.380 You would say the other person got lucky and you know it's luck because the moment they tried to extend their skill into another field, it doesn't work.

00:07:16.460 So if people can't leave their field, you can tell yourself they got lucky because obviously if it's not luck, you could take that skill somewhere else and succeed again, right?

00:07:28.880 So it's just luck.

00:07:30.640 And if you can explain your own existence as being just bad luck, well then your ego is intact.

00:07:38.820 So I don't think it's jealousy, I think it's ego.

00:07:41.800 I think it's how people understand themselves.

00:07:44.760 So when people are criticizing people for leaving their field, they're really saying, I don't want you to succeed in a second field.

00:07:54.520 Because if you do, I've got some explaining to do about why I haven't succeeded in any.

00:07:59.460 I think that's what it is.

00:08:01.680 Honestly.

00:08:02.840 I saw a European who is giving some criticism to David Sachs.

00:08:09.060 Who on Twitter has been trying to be helpful and suggest ways forward for the Ukrainian war and to come up with some peace plans.

00:08:19.820 So David Sachs, who you should know as a famous tech investor kind of person, if you don't know his name, you should.

00:08:26.980 He's one of the names you should know if you want to have an awareness of how things work, right?

00:08:34.420 If you want to understand the world, he would be in the list of 100 names you should know, right?

00:08:40.780 And here's what's interesting.

00:08:44.120 We're watching people like David Sachs and Elon Musk and who was the other VC?

00:08:53.220 I can't remember his name.

00:08:54.900 But some other fairly well-known, famous people talking about what they would do or some suggestions for ending the war in Ukraine.

00:09:03.960 And I saw a European mock, specifically David Sachs, I saw a European say it was sort of an American thing that citizens would believe that they could just wade into like a nuclear confrontation and be useful.

00:09:25.800 Now, what do you think of that?

00:09:27.700 Some European guy, I think he was European, but he was non-American, saying it's an American thing to imagine.

00:09:33.960 That just an ordinary person can go like change the world.

00:09:38.660 And I think to myself, well, that's why your country isn't doing so well.

00:09:44.020 I don't even know what country he was from, but I can tell you they're not doing so well because that's what we do over here.

00:09:53.640 Now, I heard somebody else say that we're sort of a problem-solving country.

00:09:58.960 We're not just a problem-solving country.

00:10:02.800 That's part of it.

00:10:03.960 And I believe that's a huge part.

00:10:06.720 We are the most problem-solving motherfuckers who ever lived.

00:10:11.180 That is America.

00:10:12.780 We are problem-solving motherfuckers.

00:10:15.540 We'll solve a problem like nobody's business.

00:10:18.300 We know how to solve some problems.

00:10:20.020 But we also have this characteristic where we feel unlimited.

00:10:26.700 And not everybody, not all the time.

00:10:29.100 But there are enough of us Americans who feel like we actually can change the world.

00:10:34.960 And so we try.

00:10:36.520 And every once in a while, it works.

00:10:38.640 And that's how you get Apple computers, motherfuckers. 0.99

00:10:43.280 That's how you get Starlink and Tesla and SpaceX motherfuckers. 1.00

00:10:51.260 Because we don't feel like we're limited.

00:10:53.620 If we think we have something to add, we jump in.

00:10:58.620 If your car is on fire, we stop and pull you out.

00:11:02.640 We solve problems.

00:11:03.680 So when I see people making fun of David Sachs for making a citizen suggestion, I say, I don't

00:11:15.880 think you understand what's happening right now.

00:11:17.960 I would put David Sachs in the internet dad category.

00:11:23.840 I don't know if he'd want to be in that category.

00:11:25.720 And what I mean is people who have built credibility in some realm, and they're trying to use it

00:11:34.600 productively to make the world a better place.

00:11:38.660 Because I honestly think that's primarily what Elon Musk is trying to do.

00:11:43.260 Like, long ago, he made enough money.

00:11:45.640 I think he's trying to fix the world.

00:11:48.720 And when I watch David Sachs' tweets, I don't see anything else.

00:11:53.380 I don't see him trying to make money out of Ukraine.

00:11:57.160 Nothing.

00:11:57.820 He's just trying to fix a problem.

00:12:00.500 And so am I.

00:12:02.300 So am I.

00:12:02.940 I mean, I have a business model which allows me to benefit the larger my audience is.

00:12:09.180 But that's pretty standard stuff.

00:12:11.340 I mean, I wouldn't be doing it just for the money.

00:12:13.880 It's not what I would do.

00:12:15.040 I would do it because I think I could.

00:12:17.000 Maybe I could add something.

00:12:19.660 So here's what I'm going to add.

00:12:21.600 This, the Ukraine war, I don't think our politicians can solve this one.

00:12:27.920 It has that weird characteristic that the politicians aren't going to be able to get this done.

00:12:34.040 So if we need to get to some kind of a good end point, it's going to be the Internet dads.

00:12:41.980 It's going to be the Internet dads.

00:12:44.160 So let me tell you what one of them says.

00:12:46.160 And I'm not going to promote this particular idea.

00:12:50.000 All right.

00:12:50.340 Because I don't want Ukraine to be mad at me yet. 0.99

00:12:54.060 They will be.

00:12:55.500 But not yet.

00:12:57.600 There is a day when Ukraine will be mad at me. 1.00

00:13:00.260 But not yet.

00:13:01.620 So I'm just going to say what David Sack's idea is for ending the war.

00:13:05.800 So he says, concrete suggestion, U.S. proposes an armistice based on February 23rd lines,

00:13:20.420 along with a guarantee that Ukraine won't become part of NATO.

00:13:23.340 Now, what are the February 23rd lines?

00:13:29.200 Does that mean that Russia would give back everything but Crimea?

00:13:35.920 Is that what February?

00:13:37.940 Is that what that is?

00:13:40.220 That's what that is, right?

00:13:41.780 So the suggestion, again, this is not mine.

00:13:45.440 So Ukraine, you can't be mad at me.

00:13:47.820 I'm just talking.

00:13:48.820 So the idea would be that Russia would keep Crimea, which some would say is, you know,

00:13:59.940 a settled issue, but give back the disputed areas, and then Ukraine doesn't join NATO.

00:14:09.200 Now, if you were an observer, who would you say won in that case?

00:14:15.320 Who would be the winner if that were the peace plan?

00:14:18.820 Would you say that Russia won, because it keeps Ukraine out of NATO, and they keep Crimea,

00:14:28.740 but they were going to keep that anyway, probably?

00:14:32.000 Would you say that that would be a case of Russia winning?

00:14:35.780 Or would you say that both of them had a little pain, which is sort of what you want for a lasting peace,

00:14:42.400 you know, a little bit of pain?

00:14:43.240 Why are you so focused on Ukraine?

00:14:48.820 Well, could it be the 10% to 25% chance of nuclear war?

00:14:56.000 Was that a serious question?

00:14:58.280 You're wondering why I'm focused on the Ukraine?

00:15:01.760 Like, our entire civilization depends on this.

00:15:05.560 Everything.

00:15:05.840 So, yeah, I'm going to focus on that.

00:15:14.220 So, what do you think of that idea?

00:15:17.260 Well, it doesn't matter what you think about it, does it?

00:15:20.240 Because you're Americans, and you're not in it. 1.00

00:15:23.280 So, here's the, but the rest of it gets into more what happens if you don't.

00:15:31.300 So, here's the rest of Sack's suggestion.

00:15:35.380 If Moscow rejects that idea, because obviously that would be them giving up some land that they control right now.

00:15:44.260 If Moscow rejects, war goes on until the February 23rd line is reached.

00:15:50.520 So, there's an assumption here that Ukraine would eventually be able to take back those disputed territories anyway.

00:15:58.860 But maybe not Crimea.

00:16:00.060 And then he goes on, even if Moscow rejects the proposal now, keeping it on the table creates an alternative to nuclear use if they become desperate, thereby reducing the risk of nuclear war.

00:16:17.700 Now, do you see that David Sachs, a citizen, a citizen of America, that's all, not an elected person,

00:16:30.060 he just protected you from nuclear war.

00:16:35.520 He just did that.

00:16:37.460 Like, actually, literally, with a tweet.

00:16:39.520 He protected you from nuclear war.

00:16:42.200 Now, not completely.

00:16:43.780 Not completely.

00:16:44.960 But he's high enough visibility, high enough visibility that if enough people retweet that, and I retweeted it, some other people did,

00:16:52.980 if enough people retweet it, Russia will see that there are some, let's say, prominent voices who have a plan that Putin might be able to live with.

00:17:04.860 That's less than nuclear war.

00:17:07.880 And that escape valve, the fact that there might be an escape valve that prominent Americans would support,

00:17:14.820 does give Putin a little bit of a backdoor if he needs it.

00:17:20.500 It does take the risk of nuclear holocaust down. 0.83

00:17:25.740 Now, why did he have to do that?

00:17:30.640 Why did David Sachs have to reduce the risk of nuclear war himself?

00:17:36.700 Why did he have to do it personally?

00:17:38.720 Because nobody else was.

00:17:41.000 Nobody else did.

00:17:41.800 Where is Biden's plan that would give Putin an exit, you know, to escape from nuclear war?

00:17:51.420 Where is that?

00:17:52.960 It's like the reason that the Internet dads get involved is because something needed to be done and it wasn't getting done.

00:18:01.800 And here, David Sachs just protected you from nuclear war with a tweet.

00:18:07.320 Literally.

00:18:07.880 Now, I'm not saying, you know, he reduced the odds of war.

00:18:12.520 I mean, he didn't reduce the odds to zero.

00:18:16.760 I'm saying it makes a difference.

00:18:18.720 Now, if that message got extended, then Ukraine would hate it and they'd be arguing about how terrible it is.

00:18:26.120 But it would be an alternative.

00:18:29.540 It only has to exist as a functional alternative that people are talking about.

00:18:35.120 And he did that for you.

00:18:37.120 He did that for you.

00:18:38.640 So, to whoever it was who was saying, you know, this is about Americans, that Americans think that, you know, if you're just a citizen, you can just jump in and make a difference.

00:18:49.480 He did it.

00:18:51.080 He jumped in and he already made a difference.

00:18:55.200 That's a real difference.

00:18:57.240 I feel it.

00:18:58.240 I mean, I feel safer because a prominent, smart person in America raised a potential peace plan that I think, well, I can see Putin maybe sort of last resort taking that plan.

00:19:16.200 I don't know.

00:19:16.900 I think you're seeing something amazing happening that's not quite appreciated, but I'll try to help you, try to help you appreciate it.

00:19:29.380 Did you know that there's still, this is actually a real fact.

00:19:35.100 Like, I can't even believe I'm going to say this.

00:19:39.520 All right.

00:19:39.740 So, it's, what is it, it's October, it's 2022, and I'm just going to read you this fact, and I just shake your head and, like, your head can hit the floor.

00:19:52.480 I'm just going to read the fact.

00:19:54.880 Did you know that a lot of our voting machines are still connected to the internet by modems?

00:19:59.380 Not accidentally.

00:20:01.380 Not accidentally.

00:20:03.140 Not accidentally.

00:20:05.340 That the normal way that they work is they transmit their results by modem.

00:20:12.220 And so, as of even today, even today, when the experts are very clear that this is a hacking vulnerability,

00:20:23.240 are there any experts who say that there's no risk of having modems attached to your voting machines?

00:20:30.740 I don't believe so.

00:20:33.080 I've never heard one.

00:20:34.540 I've never heard any expert, like a hacker expert, I've never heard one say,

00:20:40.960 ah, it's okay to connect to the internet.

00:20:43.240 What could go wrong?

00:20:45.720 Now, I was under the impression that this didn't exist.

00:20:50.580 How could I have been under that impression?

00:20:53.900 Because I follow the news pretty closely.

00:20:56.380 Pretty closely.

00:20:57.540 How many of you knew that in a number of states, and there are important states, too,

00:21:02.900 it's like several important states, that they're still attached to the internet?

00:21:09.000 Did you know that?

00:21:12.400 You know, I'd seen reports or allegations of that, but I was pretty sure that they stopped doing it.

00:21:19.180 Like, I was sure that that was an old practice, that nobody would do that anymore.

00:21:26.200 Oh, my God.

00:21:29.380 Now, are you also watching the election denial, what would you call it, the flip?

00:21:38.660 So, somebody else called this out on Twitter, so this is not my original thought.

00:21:44.020 But I wish it had been.

00:21:45.340 It's a really good original thought.

00:21:46.900 I forget who said it first.

00:21:48.300 I wish I remembered.

00:21:51.340 Oh, was it Cernovich?

00:21:53.460 Maybe.

00:21:54.660 It might have been Cernovich.

00:21:56.260 But here's the flip.

00:21:58.440 That now that the polls are suggesting a potential big Republican win, I'm not sure I believe that yet,

00:22:05.360 but the polls suggest there might be a Republican wave.

00:22:09.140 And what are the Democrats going to start to talk about?

00:22:14.500 Election integrity.

00:22:15.380 Because if the Republicans win, the Democrats will claim, they will claim the election was rigged.

00:22:23.280 So, I'm seeing people say it was Mike Cernovich who pointed that out.

00:22:28.440 Yeah, you have to see it developing now, because it's already developing.

00:22:32.640 You can see it happening now.

00:22:34.800 So, suddenly the Democrats are going to get all kinds of religion about how vulnerable our elections are.

00:22:42.340 So, watch for that.

00:22:43.140 Yeah, I mean, it's already happening, but, yeah, I think you're right.

00:22:49.400 It must have been a Mike Cernovich tweet.

00:22:51.040 So, there's also a hacking story.

00:22:59.620 I guess the Mexican government got hacked.

00:23:03.320 It's not clear who hacked them.

00:23:05.340 I guess there's some hacker group taking credit.

00:23:07.960 It's a Mexican hacker group.

00:23:09.840 But they found, among other things,

00:23:13.300 alleged connections between the political class, meaning the Mexican politicians,

00:23:19.340 the ruling party, and organized crime.

00:23:22.840 In other words, the cartels.

00:23:25.240 So, now the hackers have evidence of connection between the Mexican government and the cartels.

00:23:33.980 How often are you seeing now calls for direct military intervention in Mexico?

00:23:40.980 You're seeing that now, right?

00:23:42.660 I saw it on Fox News yesterday.

00:23:44.480 There was a direct call for direct military confrontation with the fentanyl labs.

00:23:54.580 Just bomb them.

00:23:56.280 Now, who's the first person you heard say that in the world?

00:24:03.800 Right.

00:24:05.260 And I've told you before that one of the benefits I can provide is that I'm not embarrassed by stuff.

00:24:12.420 I'm not embarrassed by stuff.

00:24:13.640 So, I can say something like that out loud and just test it out.

00:24:20.340 Trump said it after I said it.

00:24:22.980 Yeah.

00:24:23.680 Way after I said it.

00:24:26.320 And because I've been able to say it,

00:24:31.360 that allows other people to say it because I didn't get canceled and nobody called me crazy.

00:24:36.900 Oh, actually, people did call me crazy, but it wasn't that bad.

00:24:39.600 And then we heard that Trump actually floated the idea internally, but he was called crazy.

00:24:45.120 But now it's in your head, right?

00:24:48.280 Now you know that Trump floated the idea.

00:24:51.140 Now you've heard a few people talk about it.

00:24:53.540 Now suddenly, an idea that was just ridiculous, now what's it sound like?

00:24:59.800 Now it sounds almost inevitable, doesn't it?

00:25:02.800 It is.

00:25:03.640 It is inevitable.

00:25:04.500 There is no scenario where we don't attack Mexico. 1.00

00:25:08.920 You know that, right?

00:25:10.740 There's no scenario in which it doesn't happen.

00:25:13.840 It's only a matter of when.

00:25:15.620 So we can do it later or sooner, but we're totally going to attack the fentanyl facilities in Mexico.

00:25:23.440 That is going to happen.

00:25:24.660 So get ready for that.

00:25:30.700 So let's talk about Ye.

00:25:35.860 So how many of you saw Ye, who is the artist formerly known as Kanye,

00:25:44.320 how many saw his full interview on the podcast Drunk Champs?

00:25:52.060 Did anybody see that?

00:25:54.660 All right, I watched it.

00:25:56.340 I guess it's been yanked in a lot of places because, wow, did he double down.

00:26:02.880 You know, I told you that after he made his statements about DEFCON 3 for Jewish people.

00:26:11.300 So the first thing we learned is that he didn't mean death as in somebody dying.

00:26:16.800 He meant DEFCON as in DF, but he spelled it wrong.

00:26:21.060 He meant DEFCON as in defensive.

00:26:26.140 That's what he says.

00:26:27.880 Yeah, I'm not going to make...

00:26:29.280 I will make no defense.

00:26:35.600 All right.

00:26:36.280 So I want you...

00:26:37.020 So here's the context of this conversation.

00:26:39.840 Nothing I say is intended to defend him.

00:26:42.720 He's on his own.

00:26:44.260 And he's doing fine.

00:26:46.520 You know, surprisingly, I think he might actually turn this around.

00:26:49.120 I'll tell you that why in a minute.

00:26:51.380 Now, first of all, is what he said about Jewish people appropriate, true, good? 0.79

00:27:03.240 Was it bigoted?

00:27:07.120 Was it racist?

00:27:09.200 I'm going to say yes.

00:27:11.800 Big yes.

00:27:14.240 Yeah, that's as bigoted and racist as you can get.

00:27:18.880 Now, I wasn't entirely sure when I saw the tweet, but when you see his extended interview, he's very clear.

00:27:25.600 He's very clear that he believes that Jewish people have been blocking him and black people in general at every turn.

00:27:35.760 And although he would claim that this is not about hate, because he would claim that black people are Jewish also.

00:27:42.960 I don't know that argument, but let's go with it for now.

00:27:45.460 But he does say very clearly, Jewish people.

00:27:53.400 He doesn't say a few people who happen to also be Jewish or something like that.

00:27:58.900 He actually, he's making a statement about Jewish people.

00:28:02.480 I will, however, give you this context, and I haven't seen anybody say it yet.

00:28:10.920 The context with which he was super bigoted and, do you call it racist?

00:28:17.620 Is being anti-Semitic racist?

00:28:22.280 Do we use that word?

00:28:23.700 Is that a 2022?

00:28:24.620 I'm not sure if that's a 2022 spin or not, is it?

00:28:30.700 I mean, I don't think it is, but it's in that category.

00:28:35.080 Let's call it bigoted.

00:28:36.460 Let's go with bigoted.

00:28:40.060 So here's my not a defense.

00:28:44.740 So I don't want anybody coming at me later and saying, you defended him, because he's on his own.

00:28:50.180 When you go this far out, you're on your own.

00:28:52.700 And we'll see if he can handle it.

00:28:55.920 I don't know.

00:28:57.120 I don't know.

00:28:58.300 But here's the context I want to give you.

00:29:02.000 The context with which he said his super bigoted stuff was weirdly complimentary.

00:29:11.860 Weirdly complimentary.

00:29:14.020 And I'm going to give you an analogy, not as an argument, but just so you can see my point.

00:29:20.780 So I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

00:29:23.540 Analogies are not good for that. 1.00

00:29:25.300 It's just so it'll illuminate my point a little bit better.

00:29:29.980 Suppose a white person went on television, a celebrity, and said that black people play basketball really well.

00:29:39.960 Would he be canceled?

00:29:40.800 Would a white celebrity be canceled for saying that black people sure play basketball really well?

00:29:52.400 You say yes?

00:29:53.920 Seriously.

00:29:54.580 You think you'd get canceled for saying black people play basketball well? 1.00

00:29:59.640 Really?

00:30:01.260 No, I don't think so.

00:30:02.820 Oh, this didn't work out at all.

00:30:04.100 You were all supposed to agree with me that that wouldn't be a problem.

00:30:09.060 I'll be damned.

00:30:10.760 No, the way you say it matters, the way you say it matters, right?

00:30:14.780 If you got into some weird genetic thing, then suddenly you're canceled.

00:30:19.800 Now, keep in mind, I'm not making a claim.

00:30:23.180 I'm saying if there were a person like that, would you say they're racist?

00:30:27.220 Now, here's the first thing you should say.

00:30:31.540 Yes, that would be a racist statement, wouldn't it?

00:30:35.300 Nobody would disagree with the fact that it would be racist.

00:30:38.380 It's literally talking about a difference in a race.

00:30:42.080 That's as racist by definition as you could be.

00:30:45.380 But it would be the kind of thing that didn't make people too mad, would it?

00:30:50.020 Would a lot of black people be angry if they knew that a white celebrity said black people play basketball pretty well?

00:30:57.220 Would they?

00:31:01.040 They might, just to get some attention, but nobody would take it seriously.

00:31:05.460 Would they?

00:31:06.520 Because the context, you know, you'd have to worry if that conversation is going to go somewhere else, right?

00:31:14.380 You'd have to worry if the conversation would go in a bad direction.

00:31:18.880 But if you limited it just to that statement,

00:31:23.200 I think people would say, well, that's totally racist,

00:31:26.040 but we also don't mind that much.

00:31:29.520 Now, let's get back to Kanye.

00:31:31.800 What did Kanye say about the Jewish people who he says were blocking him at every turn?

00:31:40.500 Did he say that they were dumb?

00:31:43.100 No.

00:31:44.320 Did he say they broke the laws?

00:31:47.140 No.

00:31:48.300 Did he say that they were acting unethically?

00:31:50.040 Unethically.

00:31:51.560 Not really.

00:31:53.080 Not really.

00:31:53.740 Did he say they were being immoral?

00:31:55.980 I didn't hear anything like that.

00:31:58.180 Did he say that they were less than, in any way, anybody else?

00:32:03.940 I didn't hear it.

00:32:05.300 In fact, everything I heard was that he wanted to emulate their strategy and success.

00:32:13.640 And he thought black people should be more like that because there was something working in that community

00:32:20.720 and it wasn't working in his community, and he thinks maybe they could learn from that

00:32:24.920 and that maybe they should fight as hard, maybe they should join together in some cases or something.

00:32:31.900 So, will Ye be cancelled?

00:32:37.180 Well, he was.

00:32:37.860 I guess he's semi-cancelled now.

00:32:40.740 Will he be cancelled for saying that the Jewish people, mostly in America, I guess,

00:32:48.820 have been very successful and he wishes black people could rise to that level of performance?

00:32:56.900 Because that's what I heard.

00:32:58.140 Now, at the same time, that's what I heard.

00:33:01.780 It was really offensive.

00:33:04.720 Did anybody else have that same feeling?

00:33:07.840 Like, I had two brains going at the same time.

00:33:10.860 One brain was sort of complimentary, and the other brain is, why is it offending me?

00:33:18.180 And I think the reason it offends me is maybe the same reason you said people would be offended

00:33:22.560 if somebody said black people play basketball well.

00:33:26.240 It would be offensive because you don't think the conversation is going to stop there, right?

00:33:31.200 It's not about that.

00:33:32.940 It's because you think the conversation isn't going to stop.

00:33:35.840 You're going to like, oh, don't bring that into other realms, you're in trouble.

00:33:42.020 Now, here's the safe way to bring it into other realms.

00:33:46.080 Here's what I always mock about white people. 0.94

00:33:52.760 The dumbest thing that, well, I don't know, there would be a lot of competition for the dumbest thing.

00:33:57.140 But one of the dumb things that white people do is imagine that the successes of the very few white people who really nailed it

00:34:06.500 is somehow, like, we get some of the credit for that.

00:34:10.180 Like, I don't get any credit for Steve Jobs.

00:34:13.320 I don't get any credit for Elon Musk or Bill Gates.

00:34:16.960 I don't get any credit.

00:34:18.780 What, because I got some pigment in common?

00:34:23.520 What does it matter to me that I'm also white?

00:34:26.920 That those few people who are not me, they're not me.

00:34:32.380 Well, why do I get credit for them?

00:34:34.600 It doesn't make any sense at all.

00:34:35.860 Well, so even if you said, oh, there's this one group that has, you know, let's say higher math scores.

00:34:43.140 Well, that doesn't change my math score.

00:34:46.000 My math score doesn't change at all if there's somebody who has my same pigmentation who's really good at calculus.

00:34:52.680 Doesn't help me at all.

00:34:54.800 Now, here's another point I've been dying to make.

00:34:58.600 I'm going to talk about the Dilbert comic that's going to get me in a little bit of cancellation trouble.

00:35:06.720 When I talk about how my own career was, let's say, limited by being a white male,

00:35:15.080 and in two corporate careers, I was told directly that I couldn't be promoted because I was white and male.

00:35:21.460 Now, when people hear that, they think, oh, this reverse discrimination thing, you're talking about, blah, blah, blah.

00:35:27.500 Here's the thing that they're all missing.

00:35:30.260 Who am I complaining about?

00:35:31.540 Who am I complaining about?

00:35:34.540 Did I say that black people are discriminating against me for being white?

00:35:40.080 That's never happened.

00:35:41.900 In my entire life, I can think of zero cases where any black person ever discriminated against me.

00:35:49.440 Zero.

00:35:50.780 I mean, I can't think of any.

00:35:54.480 At all.

00:35:55.740 My whole life.

00:35:56.420 Do you know who was discriminating against me when I was told I couldn't get promoted because I was white and male?

00:36:04.300 White men. 0.62

00:36:05.760 Rich white guys.

00:36:06.960 Yeah.

00:36:07.540 Rich white guys were discriminated against me.

00:36:10.920 So, why can't I identify as black?

00:36:14.180 Because I hate rich white guys as much as anybody else who might hate them.

00:36:18.840 Now, of course, when I became a rich white guy, the first thing I did was try to increase the diversity.

00:36:30.420 I shouldn't even admit that.

00:36:32.160 But I've been on both sides of the conversation.

00:36:34.700 So, I've been on the side of the conversation where I would be denied opportunity because I was white.

00:36:39.380 But I've also been in the room, I've never admitted this before, I've also been in the room with other white people discussing how we've got to get some non-white people in this project or in this group or on this team or on this startup or something because it helps.

00:37:00.140 So, I've been, you know, it's one less thing you have to explain away.

00:37:04.500 Like, do you want to start a company and then it becomes a unicorn and after it becomes a unicorn, somebody says, every single person in your company is a white male.

00:37:16.920 There's just no, I don't need that trouble.

00:37:19.060 So, as soon as you're a rich white male, the first thing you do is look to discriminate against poor white males.

00:37:28.520 And, you know, I would love to tell you I was above that impulse, but it's just self-interest.

00:37:33.160 It's pure self-interest.

00:37:35.760 You know, you're not really thinking in terms of discriminating.

00:37:39.200 You're thinking about what's good for yourself.

00:37:42.740 Right?

00:37:43.380 And what's good for myself is to live in a world that's diverse and nobody's complaining.

00:37:49.120 So, sometimes I try to make that world for myself.

00:37:52.880 Yeah.

00:37:53.360 So, if you imagine that there's something wrong with me because I pursue self-interest in a free market society, I would say, that's what the free market is supposed to do.

00:38:05.380 It's supposed to give me this playing field and then say, go pursue your self-interest as hard as you can.

00:38:11.780 And so I do.

00:38:13.480 Let's move along.

00:38:14.800 You're right.

00:38:15.160 Have you also noticed how, this is also a David Sachs observation, that Ukraine is, eastern Ukraine, it's not even all of Ukraine, just that little strip of Ukraine on the east, is the new organizing principle of American foreign policy.

00:38:33.580 Now, when I read the first sentence, I was like, what?

00:38:37.680 That's a big claim.

00:38:39.360 That that little part of Ukraine, that's our organizing principle for American, for all of our American foreign policy?

00:38:48.640 That's crazy.

00:38:49.880 And then he gives us examples.

00:38:51.660 Venezuela becomes our friend suddenly? 0.92

00:38:53.860 Oh, okay.

00:38:55.060 Saudi Arabia becomes an enemy?

00:38:56.840 Hmm.

00:38:57.100 You know, Europe freezes, global south starves, and the U.S. has a recession.

00:39:04.420 All over a piece of real estate that has never been a vital U.S. interest.

00:39:09.680 That sums it up pretty well.

00:39:12.480 Yeah.

00:39:12.940 We've changed our entire, and I would argue even Taiwan. 1.00

00:39:17.080 The risk of Taiwan being lost to China probably has something to do with Ukraine as well, doesn't it?

00:39:26.400 I mean, suddenly everything's about one strip of land in Ukraine that we don't give a shit about. 0.89

00:39:32.420 Honestly, we don't care.

00:39:34.140 We really don't.

00:39:38.880 And then I saw this question on Twitter.

00:39:42.280 Explain how Ukraine could end in the best case scenario for the ending of the Ukraine conflict.

00:39:50.160 What does that look like to you?

00:39:51.360 What's the best case that you could imagine?

00:39:53.500 Not that it's likely.

00:39:55.760 I'm not saying it's likely, but what would be the best case, the most optimistic case?

00:40:01.100 And I tried to answer that question.

00:40:03.860 I think the best case would be Putin gets removed in a coup, but we get lucky, because remember, this is the best case.

00:40:10.440 Not the most likely case, just the best case.

00:40:12.820 That Putin gets removed in an internal coup, gets replaced with a leader who's more cautious.

00:40:20.180 He doesn't have to be less, you know, less, I don't know, Russia is great, but he needs to be more cautious, at least for a while. 0.98

00:40:29.720 That would buy us something.

00:40:32.040 Ukraine stays mostly intact, and nuclear power gets a huge boost, because nobody wants to be beholden to Russia.

00:40:40.360 So I think that the best case scenario is that the American energy companies maybe get a boost if we're providing more to Europe.

00:40:48.840 That could be nice.

00:40:52.600 Russia becomes less of a thorn in our side.

00:40:58.080 I think there's an upside.

00:41:00.380 I mean, it doesn't look good, because we've spent all of our money.

00:41:02.640 And all of the Ukrainian women moved to the United States and married American men.

00:41:08.220 Yeah.

00:41:09.060 So, lots of upside there.

00:41:13.700 Let's see.

00:41:16.680 So, this is like a small story, but it's like connected.

00:41:20.560 I'll talk about George Floyd in a minute, too.

00:41:22.780 So, Olivia Wilde, actress, and I guess she's a film producer, director now, has a new movie that's getting good reviews.

00:41:32.840 But she goes to this gala, academy, museum gala thing, wearing a brawless see-through gown.

00:41:41.900 And I see that, and I say to myself, 2022 is the year when children have to wonder about their mother's tits and ass being on the internet.

00:41:58.520 It's like, the number of people who have to worry about that now.

00:42:02.420 And Kadya was talking about that, too.

00:42:04.480 He was talking about Kim Kardashian.

00:42:05.720 And he was complaining that his children, you know, his children have to see his 40-something-year-old wife showing her ass in a magazine because the fashion industry sort of forces her to do that.

00:42:21.540 And I thought, this is such a, this is such a 2022 problem of children seeing their mother's ass on Instagram.

00:42:32.900 There are a number of, there are some accounts that I follow on Instagram that every now and then you'll, you'll see that they've, you know, well, never mind.

00:42:44.040 You're going to change the topic.

00:42:45.520 Let's talk about George Floyd.

00:42:47.080 So, one of the things that Yeh said on his controversial interview is that after watching Candace Owens' documentary about George Floyd,

00:42:57.720 he believes that George Floyd died of fentanyl and not from what the coroner concluded, which was the knee on his back slash neck.

00:43:07.780 And, of course, there is a lot of pushback on that because if there's one thing we can trust,

00:43:15.640 it's that a coroner in the year 2022, when every single one of our organization systems and leaders are corrupt,

00:43:26.220 one thing we can depend on is that a coroner told us the truth.

00:43:29.980 So, that's good.

00:43:33.760 Now, you might say to yourself, if he had, if he had concluded that fentanyl had been the cause of death,

00:43:41.040 he would be murdered.

00:43:43.200 And that's probably true.

00:43:45.580 So, it could be, if you were like a conspiracy theorist, you would say,

00:43:51.440 what would a person who risks his life do in that situation?

00:43:56.520 Would he lie to save his own life?

00:44:02.360 I don't know.

00:44:02.780 Do people lie to save their own life?

00:44:06.040 Is that something people do?

00:44:07.820 Do you think the jurors found Chauvin guilty to save their own lives?

00:44:15.300 No, that doesn't happen.

00:44:17.180 Never know.

00:44:17.720 All right.

00:44:20.600 Here's what I say.

00:44:26.000 Let me say this in the least offensive way I can,

00:44:29.940 because what was going to come out of my mouth was going to be pretty bad.

00:44:33.000 Let me reword that in my head, and now I'm ready.

00:44:36.400 Okay.

00:44:38.860 If you tell me that the coroner was correct,

00:44:43.060 and that he accurately got the cause of death,

00:44:47.960 which would also require that the verdict was correct.

00:44:54.220 If you tell me that, you could be right.

00:44:57.740 You could be right.

00:44:59.060 It's entirely possible that it's just what it looks like.

00:45:02.460 The coroner is a professional, did a good job,

00:45:05.340 told us the truth,

00:45:06.740 and the jury got the right answer.

00:45:08.120 Totally possible.

00:45:08.920 If you believe it because somebody told you it's true,

00:45:15.760 you're a fucking idiot. 0.99

00:45:18.440 It's 2022, people.

00:45:20.480 You can't believe that the coroner told you the truth.

00:45:23.680 We don't live in that world.

00:45:26.880 You know that, right?

00:45:29.140 A coroner lying would be the most ordinary thing in our world,

00:45:33.900 and a coroner lying in that situation would be almost guaranteed.

00:45:39.940 You get that, right?

00:45:42.280 It doesn't matter, regardless of what Floyd died from,

00:45:48.140 the coroner could only give you one cause of death.

00:45:51.880 If the coroner had said fentanyl was the cause of death,

00:45:55.000 which I believe his original notes suggested it might be,

00:45:58.300 if the coroner said that, it would have been chaos.

00:46:03.660 It wasn't really an option.

00:46:06.060 So, in a perfect world,

00:46:10.560 the coroner only had,

00:46:11.840 there was only one thing the coroner could conclude,

00:46:14.300 but maybe it was also true.

00:46:16.480 I'm not saying it wasn't true.

00:46:19.140 I'm saying that would be a nice coincidence if it were also true.

00:46:22.060 So, before you watch the documentary,

00:46:27.840 remember what I told you about documentaries.

00:46:30.800 All documentaries are persuasive,

00:46:33.420 because they're one argument without the other side.

00:46:37.460 So, before you watch the Floyd documentary,

00:46:40.760 here's an exercise you should all do.

00:46:43.760 Remember the documentary about Michael Jackson

00:46:47.320 allegedly being a child abuser.

00:46:49.840 If you watch that documentary,

00:46:52.360 you came away thinking,

00:46:53.340 he's totally, totally a child abuser.

00:46:56.220 There's no doubt about it.

00:46:57.640 Just removed all doubt in your mind.

00:47:00.840 And then, watch the documentary

00:47:03.160 that debunks the documentary you just believed.

00:47:08.180 And you will find yourself totally convinced

00:47:10.580 that the first one was fake,

00:47:13.260 and it has been successfully debunked.

00:47:16.140 Now, is that my final answer?

00:47:18.060 No, because what I learned

00:47:20.620 is that all documentaries are persuasive.

00:47:23.740 That's all.

00:47:24.820 I don't know what happened at Neverland.

00:47:26.820 I don't think I could ever know.

00:47:28.940 But I do know that both of those documentaries

00:47:30.900 were 100% persuasive.

00:47:33.480 So, when you watch Candace Owens' documentary,

00:47:36.900 whatever claim it makes,

00:47:39.520 you will be persuaded.

00:47:41.420 You will be.

00:47:42.020 But if you haven't seen

00:47:44.280 whatever other documentary

00:47:45.980 would tell the other story,

00:47:48.000 just be aware of that.

00:47:50.100 Just be a, let's say, 0.99

00:47:53.900 a smart consumer of the news.

00:47:57.860 I think this is hilarious,

00:48:03.320 that Katie Hobbs refuses to debate Carrie Lake,

00:48:08.160 running for governor there in Arizona,

00:48:10.920 and that Katie Hobbs won't even exactly say

00:48:13.940 why she refuses to debate her.

00:48:15.980 I think I know why.

00:48:22.880 I don't really pay attention

00:48:24.840 to the state stuff too much,

00:48:27.120 especially if it's not my state.

00:48:29.360 But if you spend one minute

00:48:32.760 listening to Carrie Lake talk on television,

00:48:36.300 and then listen to one minute

00:48:37.780 of Katie Hobbs talking on television,

00:48:40.460 it's pretty obvious

00:48:42.600 why she doesn't want to debate her.

00:48:45.620 It would be a slaughter.

00:48:47.580 It would just be a slaughter.

00:48:51.500 So, I think she's going to do

00:48:54.280 the Joe Biden strategy

00:48:56.680 of just, you know,

00:48:59.820 of just not showing up

00:49:02.660 and hoping that that's good enough.

00:49:04.380 I'd like to bring up this topic again,

00:49:10.860 and I'll tie this into something new.

00:49:14.300 I was reminded by an article

00:49:16.080 that 34% of white college applicants

00:49:18.680 say they're minorities 0.98

00:49:19.720 to get accepted in college.

00:49:23.660 34% of white college applicants

00:49:28.080 lie and say they're minorities.

00:49:30.940 And apparently it works every time.

00:49:35.560 Do you know why?

00:49:37.120 Because the rules are

00:49:38.220 they can't doubt you.

00:49:40.040 The rules are you can identify

00:49:41.380 as anything you want.

00:49:43.020 Now, I didn't make the rules.

00:49:45.180 I did not make the rules.

00:49:47.340 But if those are the rules,

00:49:49.680 you should identify

00:49:51.740 as whatever gets you the most money.

00:49:54.140 Because those are the rules.

00:49:56.380 Now, again,

00:49:57.320 I don't believe in cheating.

00:49:59.360 I believe in following the rules.

00:50:02.220 But those are the rules.

00:50:04.000 You can identify.

00:50:05.340 And by the way,

00:50:06.820 you don't need to give a reason

00:50:08.320 for your identification.

00:50:09.740 That's also a rule.

00:50:11.680 If somebody identifies as whatever,

00:50:15.420 do I get to question their decision?

00:50:18.200 No.

00:50:19.280 No, I do not.

00:50:20.540 I do not get to say,

00:50:21.840 in my opinion,

00:50:22.800 you are not that thing.

00:50:24.160 That is not part of the conversation.

00:50:26.220 So if those are the rules,

00:50:27.400 anybody who is identifying

00:50:29.540 as something that pays you less,

00:50:32.840 why?

00:50:34.560 I mean, to me,

00:50:35.540 when I see this statistic,

00:50:37.120 34% of white college applicants

00:50:39.000 say they're minorities,

00:50:40.720 my brain translates that into,

00:50:44.180 wow,

00:50:45.380 that's a lot of white college applicants 0.99

00:50:47.300 who are fucking idiots. 0.98

00:50:49.040 Only 34% were even smart enough

00:50:51.640 to apply for the way

00:50:53.000 that they get free money.

00:50:53.960 How many people were not applying

00:50:58.780 in the way to get free money?

00:51:00.440 Of course you should get the free money.

00:51:03.200 Of course.

00:51:04.520 I may have told you this before,

00:51:06.100 but when I applied to college

00:51:07.580 back in the 70s,

00:51:10.320 on one application,

00:51:13.520 I said I was Native American.

00:51:15.900 Because I believed at the time,

00:51:17.480 incorrectly,

00:51:18.460 like Elizabeth Warren,

00:51:19.920 I believed I had a little bit.

00:51:21.040 That was like the family rumor

00:51:22.500 that we were part Native American.

00:51:24.340 So I was actually raised thinking

00:51:25.640 I was a little part,

00:51:27.120 maybe like 1,

00:51:28.640 1 28th or something like that.

00:51:31.100 But,

00:51:31.420 so I applied once

00:51:33.780 as a Native American

00:51:35.080 and I was inundated

00:51:37.480 with scholarship offers.

00:51:39.520 I was offered a free ride

00:51:41.280 to college

00:51:41.960 without filling out an application.

00:51:44.160 Let me say that again.

00:51:47.500 I was offered

00:51:48.400 full scholarships to college

00:51:51.060 without filling out

00:51:53.060 an application to those colleges.

00:51:57.040 Now, I decided

00:51:58.340 that it would be unethical

00:52:00.440 to take an advantage that large.

00:52:04.240 Because I looked at it

00:52:05.240 and thought,

00:52:05.780 I don't want to get caught doing this.

00:52:09.100 Because in those days,

00:52:10.020 it wasn't allowed.

00:52:11.120 In those days,

00:52:11.840 if you had identified

00:52:12.700 as the wrong thing,

00:52:14.080 you got caught,

00:52:14.960 you'd probably get kicked

00:52:15.680 out of college.

00:52:17.080 So, you know,

00:52:17.700 I was like,

00:52:18.100 oh, this was a fun experiment,

00:52:19.640 but I'm not actually

00:52:20.300 going to do this.

00:52:21.240 This would be a dumb crime.

00:52:24.420 Yes, Hartwick was close to home.

00:52:26.200 That's true.

00:52:27.420 And,

00:52:27.940 so I didn't do that.

00:52:29.960 But today,

00:52:30.660 it's allowed.

00:52:31.820 So now the rules

00:52:32.560 allow you to do it

00:52:33.420 and you could get caught

00:52:34.480 and it wouldn't make

00:52:35.080 any difference at all.

00:52:36.960 So, do that.

00:52:37.900 So, this week,

00:52:43.380 I'm running a series

00:52:44.720 in Dilbert

00:52:45.300 that,

00:52:47.520 if this doesn't get me

00:52:48.720 kicked off

00:52:49.280 of everything,

00:52:51.640 I'll be surprised.

00:52:54.280 Let's go read this for you.

00:52:56.060 So, it's a series

00:52:56.880 and it starts,

00:52:58.160 it starts out

00:52:58.840 a little bit tame.

00:53:00.380 So, you wouldn't know

00:53:01.640 where this series is going

00:53:02.860 unless you were familiar

00:53:03.840 with the characters.

00:53:05.360 So, I'll read it to you first

00:53:06.480 and I'll tell you why.

00:53:08.140 It's going to be trouble.

00:53:09.960 Alright, so this is

00:53:10.660 Dilbert's boss

00:53:12.220 says to Dilbert

00:53:14.340 as Dilbert's walking

00:53:15.140 by the office,

00:53:16.420 the boss says,

00:53:17.280 there's an opening

00:53:17.800 in management

00:53:18.300 for a director

00:53:19.160 of AI research.

00:53:21.560 And the boss says,

00:53:22.800 you're the only employee

00:53:23.700 with AI experience

00:53:25.080 but I'm also considering

00:53:27.000 Shook, Tina, and Dave.

00:53:29.820 And then Dilbert says,

00:53:31.220 none of them

00:53:31.780 are even close

00:53:32.640 to being qualified.

00:53:34.220 And the boss says,

00:53:35.240 do you have any idea

00:53:36.380 how bigoted you sound?

00:53:38.700 Now, what you would

00:53:39.520 have to know

00:53:40.040 is that Ashok

00:53:41.020 was born in India.

00:53:42.880 In the Dilbert comic,

00:53:44.380 he's an Indian-American.

00:53:47.760 Tina's a woman. 0.99

00:53:48.860 She's a tech writer.

00:53:49.860 She's not even

00:53:50.460 working in technology.

00:53:52.420 And Dave is the

00:53:53.420 new character

00:53:54.480 who is a black character

00:53:56.020 who identifies as white

00:53:57.960 because he's a prankster.

00:54:00.520 And he just thinks

00:54:01.080 it's funnier

00:54:01.580 to identify as white.

00:54:02.480 So this,

00:54:05.520 here's the background

00:54:06.180 of this.

00:54:06.520 This is based

00:54:07.080 on my exact experience.

00:54:08.980 Now I've changed

00:54:09.940 the job titles.

00:54:11.460 But my experience

00:54:12.280 was this.

00:54:13.720 My boss came to me

00:54:14.940 and said,

00:54:15.300 you're the obvious person,

00:54:16.800 most qualified,

00:54:18.380 but you're a white male.

00:54:21.720 So I did not get

00:54:23.000 that promotion.

00:54:24.300 So Dilbert is going

00:54:25.100 to be dealing

00:54:25.560 with my exact situation.

00:54:27.220 And it's one that

00:54:28.880 a lot of people

00:54:29.620 are dealing with

00:54:30.340 in 2022.

00:54:32.580 And in 2022,

00:54:33.900 I can get away with this.

00:54:37.020 Well, I can get away with it.

00:54:38.520 I mean,

00:54:38.760 I'm not going to go to jail.

00:54:40.380 But I expect

00:54:41.300 a lot more newspapers

00:54:43.060 will cancel me this week.

00:54:45.900 I haven't heard yet.

00:54:48.200 But probably.

00:54:50.440 Probably.

00:54:51.200 I would expect

00:54:51.840 at least one more chain

00:54:52.900 to cancel me.

00:54:53.600 And the chain

00:54:55.760 is just one decision

00:54:56.860 can take out

00:54:57.620 hundreds of newspapers

00:54:58.620 in one decision.

00:55:00.840 So this is continued.

00:55:03.280 I won't tell you

00:55:03.960 what the rest

00:55:04.900 of the series is,

00:55:06.140 but we'll have

00:55:09.380 some fun watching that.

00:55:12.540 All right.

00:55:14.620 Let's see.

00:55:15.300 What else?

00:55:16.780 We talked about

00:55:17.420 George Floyd.

00:55:19.520 I feel like there was

00:55:20.360 one other thing.

00:55:21.140 Oh, Parler.

00:55:21.720 There's so much news today.

00:55:24.400 It's all yay news.

00:55:26.580 So yay

00:55:27.100 announced this morning,

00:55:29.480 or Parler announced,

00:55:30.580 that the social media

00:55:31.640 company Parler,

00:55:32.700 that's sort of like

00:55:33.220 a Twitter knockoff,

00:55:35.360 yay is buying Parler.

00:55:37.380 So he's going to have

00:55:38.080 his own social media

00:55:39.100 thing.

00:55:41.500 What did I do?

00:55:42.640 I immediately

00:55:43.240 went to my Parler app

00:55:45.200 and signed up.

00:55:46.940 I think it was already

00:55:47.900 signed up,

00:55:48.360 but I hadn't used it.

00:55:49.880 So I renewed my thing.

00:55:51.720 So I'm going to at least

00:55:53.040 check out what he has

00:55:54.120 to say.

00:55:55.400 Now,

00:55:56.000 it's kind of interesting

00:55:56.840 because now the

00:55:57.860 conservative world

00:55:59.600 will be broken up

00:56:01.920 into truth,

00:56:03.360 social,

00:56:04.080 and Parler,

00:56:05.300 and also getter,

00:56:06.560 right?

00:56:07.520 Now there are three,

00:56:09.320 getter,

00:56:09.940 parler,

00:56:10.260 and truth.

00:56:11.740 So you're going to have

00:56:14.240 a reverse Fox News

00:56:15.780 effect here.

00:56:17.560 Fox News is the

00:56:18.840 biggest news entity

00:56:20.660 because there's only

00:56:21.520 one big entity

00:56:22.880 that talks about

00:56:23.800 conservative stuff.

00:56:25.600 And then the left

00:56:27.580 has to, you know,

00:56:28.480 share their audience,

00:56:30.220 you know,

00:56:30.420 CNN and MSNBC

00:56:31.620 and stuff.

00:56:33.020 But this is now

00:56:34.040 the opposite.

00:56:34.620 So I think the

00:56:35.220 conservative voices

00:56:36.220 will be broken

00:56:37.960 into smaller chunks,

00:56:39.340 whereas Twitter

00:56:40.340 may become

00:56:41.460 the blue

00:56:43.340 thing or something.

00:56:47.020 Oh, Gab.

00:56:48.140 Gab is out there too.

00:56:55.340 Will Ye

00:56:56.820 rename Parler?

00:56:59.540 Huh.

00:56:59.740 Maybe.

00:57:04.380 Maybe.

00:57:09.280 All right.

00:57:11.520 I think that's about

00:57:12.600 all I have to talk about.

00:57:16.900 Have we solved

00:57:18.240 all of our problems?

00:57:24.160 All right.

00:57:25.360 Here's what I think

00:57:26.140 is going to happen

00:57:26.720 with the Ukraine

00:57:28.900 nuclear standoff.

00:57:31.680 And I want to keep

00:57:33.160 telling you this

00:57:33.840 almost every day.

00:57:36.860 We will be going

00:57:38.520 to the brink

00:57:39.120 of nuclear war.

00:57:40.680 But that's

00:57:41.280 unavoidable.

00:57:42.960 Right?

00:57:43.860 And we will go

00:57:45.160 to the brink

00:57:45.820 because that's also

00:57:47.240 the fastest way

00:57:48.140 to peace.

00:57:49.660 It's the fastest way

00:57:50.620 to total destruction,

00:57:52.260 but also the only

00:57:53.440 path to peace.

00:57:54.260 because if we're

00:57:55.380 not afraid

00:57:56.160 of actually dying,

00:57:57.840 meaning everybody

00:57:58.560 involved,

00:57:59.520 they're not going

00:58:00.420 to make any deal.

00:58:02.960 Because have you

00:58:03.640 noticed that the people

00:58:04.440 doing the negotiating

00:58:05.520 are not doing

00:58:06.140 the suffering?

00:58:08.980 You know what would

00:58:09.920 be a better way

00:58:10.480 to negotiate

00:58:11.020 the end of a war?

00:58:13.120 Like, dig some

00:58:14.160 Ukrainian out 1.00

00:58:15.200 of the rubble,

00:58:16.800 like of a

00:58:17.760 destroyed

00:58:18.340 residential unit.

00:58:20.580 You know,

00:58:20.820 dig them out

00:58:21.280 of the bottom

00:58:21.660 of the rubble,

00:58:22.580 and then that

00:58:23.160 would be your

00:58:23.540 negotiator.

00:58:24.920 And then the

00:58:25.440 Russians,

00:58:26.140 you'd be,

00:58:26.680 you'd take the

00:58:27.280 mother of one

00:58:28.920 of the soldiers

00:58:29.440 who was just

00:58:30.020 killed.

00:58:31.720 So one Ukrainian 1.00

00:58:32.980 who was dug

00:58:33.720 out of the rubble,

00:58:35.080 negotiating with

00:58:36.040 one Russian

00:58:36.760 mother whose son

00:58:38.260 just died in a

00:58:39.100 stupid war, 0.68

00:58:40.020 and have those

00:58:40.840 sit down and

00:58:41.540 come up with

00:58:42.020 a peace plan.

00:58:43.600 Do you know

00:58:44.040 who can't make

00:58:44.660 a peace plan?

00:58:47.120 Zelensky,

00:58:47.680 who's having

00:58:48.040 the time of

00:58:48.620 his life.

00:58:51.540 Zelensky is

00:58:52.880 having the

00:58:53.300 time of

00:58:53.720 his life.

00:58:54.200 I mean,

00:58:54.460 it's horrible

00:58:54.960 in lots of

00:58:55.780 ways,

00:58:56.220 true,

00:58:57.420 but he's also

00:58:58.200 more alive

00:58:59.060 than he's ever

00:58:59.600 been.

00:59:00.220 He's having

00:59:00.580 the time

00:59:00.940 of his life.

00:59:01.980 He's like

00:59:02.320 the celebrity

00:59:03.000 of the world.

00:59:04.280 Of course,

00:59:05.680 he's enjoying

00:59:06.360 it on some

00:59:06.960 level.

00:59:08.640 He probably

00:59:09.180 hates it

00:59:09.660 on a lot

00:59:10.040 of levels,

00:59:10.500 but I'll

00:59:10.720 bet he's

00:59:10.980 enjoying it

00:59:11.420 on some

00:59:11.680 level.

00:59:12.700 How about

00:59:13.120 Putin?

00:59:15.680 Well,

00:59:16.220 I think he

00:59:17.260 still gets

00:59:17.820 a massage

00:59:19.800 and a

00:59:20.280 handjob

00:59:20.740 every day.

00:59:22.640 Probably

00:59:23.040 every day.

00:59:24.540 I think

00:59:25.100 he's eating

00:59:25.460 fine food

00:59:26.240 and having

00:59:27.820 a good time.

00:59:28.620 So our

00:59:29.100 problem is

00:59:29.620 we keep

00:59:30.000 asking the

00:59:30.580 people who

00:59:30.940 are not

00:59:31.240 suffering

00:59:31.620 to negotiate.

00:59:34.500 Those are

00:59:35.020 the wrong

00:59:35.300 people.

00:59:36.800 What kind

00:59:37.460 of result

00:59:37.920 are you going

00:59:38.280 to get

00:59:38.540 if the

00:59:38.880 people

00:59:39.080 negotiating

00:59:39.600 don't give

00:59:40.100 a shit

00:59:40.360 whether it

00:59:40.700 gets one

00:59:41.780 way or the

00:59:42.160 other?

00:59:42.520 It's not

00:59:42.800 going to

00:59:42.940 make much

00:59:43.300 difference.

00:59:43.640 So we're

00:59:48.260 going to

00:59:48.420 walk up

00:59:48.780 to the

00:59:49.260 brink of

00:59:49.840 war.

00:59:50.320 We will

00:59:50.720 not have

00:59:51.200 a nuclear

00:59:51.660 war.

00:59:54.060 I wouldn't

00:59:54.940 rule out

00:59:55.480 a tactical

00:59:57.880 nuclear

00:59:58.540 detonation.

01:00:00.340 That could 0.68

01:00:00.840 happen.

01:00:01.760 I think

01:00:02.200 it's unlikely,

01:00:03.680 but we're

01:00:04.240 not going

01:00:04.500 to have

01:00:04.740 nukes

01:00:05.120 flying into

01:00:05.840 America

01:00:06.320 and Moscow.

01:00:07.980 That's not

01:00:08.440 going to

01:00:08.560 happen.

01:00:09.360 Now,

01:00:09.680 what I

01:00:09.940 think will

01:00:10.240 happen is

01:00:10.700 the two

01:00:11.660 sides will

01:00:12.360 settle into

01:00:13.240 a drone

01:00:13.700 war.

01:00:14.760 And the

01:00:15.040 drone

01:00:15.340 war will 0.60

01:00:15.920 be both

01:00:16.400 unstoppable

01:00:17.060 and

01:00:18.420 un...

01:00:20.660 What's

01:00:21.920 the word

01:00:22.220 where you

01:00:22.480 just can't

01:00:22.860 put up

01:00:23.160 with it?

01:00:24.680 So it

01:00:25.300 will be

01:00:25.560 both

01:00:25.820 unstoppable

01:00:26.400 and

01:00:26.980 un...

01:00:28.700 Intolerable,

01:00:29.640 thank you.

01:00:30.200 Not

01:00:30.420 intolerable.

01:00:31.440 It will

01:00:31.640 be

01:00:31.860 intolerable

01:00:32.720 and

01:00:34.240 unstoppable.

01:00:35.680 Now,

01:00:36.220 once you

01:00:36.560 reach the

01:00:36.920 point where

01:00:37.320 it's both

01:00:37.800 intolerable

01:00:38.740 and

01:00:39.760 unstoppable

01:00:40.320 on both

01:00:41.020 sides,

01:00:42.520 then you

01:00:42.960 can

01:00:43.120 negotiate.

01:00:44.240 But it

01:00:44.640 has to

01:00:44.940 be both

01:00:45.340 intolerable

01:00:46.140 and unstoppable.

01:00:48.120 And that's

01:00:48.400 what drones

01:00:48.960 will buy

01:00:49.440 you.

01:00:50.320 So I

01:00:50.600 think drones

01:00:51.220 are going

01:00:51.600 to be...

01:00:53.520 They're going

01:00:54.100 to define

01:00:54.700 future war.

01:00:56.260 If you

01:00:56.780 can't knock

01:00:57.260 drones down,

01:00:58.000 then apparently

01:00:58.400 we can't

01:00:59.180 well enough.

01:01:01.440 Both sides

01:01:02.040 can just

01:01:02.540 degrade each

01:01:03.320 other until

01:01:03.760 those disputed

01:01:04.700 regions are

01:01:05.260 just garbage.

01:01:06.640 Nobody's going

01:01:07.120 to want them

01:01:07.420 anyway.

01:01:08.400 Except for

01:01:09.100 their resources.

01:01:09.680 Yeah,

01:01:12.560 and it's

01:01:13.520 inevitable

01:01:13.920 that chemical

01:01:14.740 weapons will

01:01:15.420 end up on

01:01:16.160 drones.

01:01:17.780 I think

01:01:18.460 that's

01:01:18.700 inevitable.

01:01:19.640 It might

01:01:19.940 not be a

01:01:20.540 state actor,

01:01:21.800 it might be

01:01:22.180 a terrorist, 0.51

01:01:23.320 but chemical

01:01:23.880 weapons on

01:01:24.480 drones,

01:01:25.960 and it's

01:01:26.600 going to be

01:01:26.920 fentanyl.

01:01:29.500 Because that's

01:01:30.200 the easiest

01:01:30.540 one to get.

01:01:31.920 So that's

01:01:32.400 what's

01:01:33.160 happening.

01:01:34.000 Or

01:01:34.120 COVID-19.

01:01:35.880 Yeah.

01:01:37.000 So here's

01:01:37.860 something that

01:01:38.620 as we check

01:01:40.520 our assumptions

01:01:41.100 about COVID,

01:01:42.780 there's an

01:01:43.300 assumption that

01:01:44.060 I used to

01:01:45.340 make that

01:01:45.780 was central

01:01:46.380 to most

01:01:47.000 of my

01:01:47.580 assumptions

01:01:48.180 that I

01:01:50.040 believe has

01:01:50.520 not been

01:01:50.980 demonstrated.

01:01:52.800 So check

01:01:54.220 this with me.

01:01:55.140 Did we not

01:01:55.880 believe at

01:01:56.600 one point

01:01:57.060 that the

01:01:57.660 amount of

01:01:58.860 infection you

01:01:59.780 initially got

01:02:00.740 would have a

01:02:01.880 big impact

01:02:02.480 on your

01:02:02.780 outcomes?

01:02:04.040 We used

01:02:04.460 to believe

01:02:04.800 that,

01:02:05.060 right?

01:02:05.700 Wasn't that

01:02:06.360 basic

01:02:06.980 understanding?

01:02:08.720 And I

01:02:09.080 would say

01:02:09.440 that the

01:02:09.980 top-level

01:02:11.100 experience

01:02:12.940 with masks,

01:02:14.060 especially,

01:02:15.280 shows that

01:02:15.820 that was not

01:02:16.260 the case.

01:02:18.560 To me,

01:02:19.260 it looks like

01:02:19.720 the viral load

01:02:20.520 thing was

01:02:20.960 always wrong,

01:02:22.520 but now we

01:02:23.300 know it.

01:02:24.180 Because if the

01:02:25.120 viral load

01:02:25.680 thing had

01:02:26.100 been true,

01:02:27.360 I think you

01:02:28.060 would have

01:02:28.260 seen a

01:02:28.580 difference

01:02:28.880 between the

01:02:29.460 masked

01:02:29.880 and unmasked

01:02:30.980 places.

01:02:33.160 Now, of

01:02:33.940 course, because

01:02:34.800 it's data and

01:02:35.780 it's the

01:02:36.060 Internet, it

01:02:37.160 will take one

01:02:37.720 minute for

01:02:38.220 somebody to

01:02:38.760 put up what

01:02:40.280 looks like

01:02:40.900 data to

01:02:42.080 show that

01:02:42.480 masks totally

01:02:43.500 worked in

01:02:44.120 some place

01:02:44.740 or another.

01:02:45.800 And it will

01:02:46.120 take one

01:02:46.580 more minute

01:02:47.040 for somebody

01:02:47.540 to debunk

01:02:48.140 that, because

01:02:49.220 nobody knows

01:02:49.880 that masks

01:02:50.300 worked or

01:02:50.760 didn't work.

01:02:51.340 It's just not

01:02:51.860 known.

01:02:52.700 But I would

01:02:53.280 think that we

01:02:53.740 would have

01:02:54.020 seen a big

01:02:54.640 effect.

01:02:55.620 If the

01:02:56.080 plume

01:02:56.480 theory was

01:02:57.260 even half

01:02:59.140 right, we

01:03:00.580 would have

01:03:00.860 seen it in

01:03:01.360 the numbers,

01:03:02.080 I think.

01:03:03.160 Wouldn't

01:03:03.480 we?

01:03:04.600 So I'm

01:03:05.220 going to

01:03:05.380 say that

01:03:05.860 one of my

01:03:06.880 guiding

01:03:07.380 assumptions

01:03:07.980 about what

01:03:10.160 would work

01:03:10.660 and what

01:03:10.960 wouldn't, I

01:03:11.580 was always

01:03:11.980 against mask

01:03:12.680 mandates, so

01:03:13.880 in case

01:03:14.200 anybody's

01:03:14.620 joining us

01:03:15.080 now, I've

01:03:15.820 never been in

01:03:16.320 favor of mask

01:03:16.980 mandates or

01:03:17.640 vaccine mandates

01:03:18.540 or closed-down

01:03:19.360 mandates, except

01:03:20.380 for the first

01:03:20.820 two weeks.

01:03:21.720 The first two

01:03:22.260 weeks was worth

01:03:22.940 the shot.

01:03:23.940 We just

01:03:24.340 didn't know it

01:03:24.820 was a bad

01:03:25.180 idea at the

01:03:25.620 time.

01:03:25.840 But I

01:03:29.220 had assumed

01:03:29.940 that if

01:03:31.080 you did

01:03:31.520 wear a

01:03:31.860 mask, it

01:03:32.260 would help

01:03:32.560 you, because

01:03:33.960 of the

01:03:34.220 plume

01:03:34.540 theory.

01:03:35.620 But now

01:03:36.280 I think I

01:03:36.980 have to

01:03:37.240 release on

01:03:37.760 that, don't

01:03:38.140 I?

01:03:39.280 Do you

01:03:39.560 like it

01:03:39.840 when I

01:03:40.060 admit I'm

01:03:40.480 wrong?

01:03:43.280 You know, I

01:03:43.880 probably admit

01:03:44.500 I'm wrong

01:03:44.900 more than

01:03:45.300 anybody in

01:03:46.340 the public

01:03:46.700 eye.

01:03:47.660 I'll bet

01:03:47.940 nobody's ever

01:03:48.660 admitted they're

01:03:49.300 wrong more

01:03:49.780 than I have.

01:03:50.320 It's like a

01:03:52.700 continuous thing

01:03:53.580 I do, like

01:03:54.320 I'm always

01:03:54.680 rolling out,

01:03:55.200 well, I was

01:03:55.560 wrong about

01:03:55.900 that.

01:03:56.900 Now, I was

01:03:57.600 not wrong

01:03:58.260 about not

01:03:59.580 wanting masks

01:04:00.220 to be mandated,

01:04:01.280 because the

01:04:02.100 bottom line is

01:04:02.700 what do you do

01:04:03.200 about it, right?

01:04:03.980 And the what

01:04:04.400 do you do

01:04:04.700 about it, I

01:04:05.260 think I was

01:04:05.680 still right,

01:04:06.940 which is the

01:04:07.700 no mask

01:04:08.120 mandate.

01:04:09.340 But I was

01:04:10.040 definitely wrong

01:04:10.620 on that

01:04:10.920 assumption,

01:04:11.980 because common

01:04:12.720 sense tells me

01:04:13.500 that a bigger

01:04:14.040 plume would be 0.86

01:04:14.800 a bigger problem,

01:04:15.920 but it didn't

01:04:16.560 show up in the

01:04:17.060 numbers.

01:04:18.280 So I'm going

01:04:18.700 to say that

01:04:19.100 that was probably

01:04:20.000 wrong, probably

01:04:21.580 wrong.

01:04:24.140 All right, now

01:04:24.880 Nisi is saying 0.92

01:04:25.580 something that's

01:04:26.120 pissing me off.

01:04:27.660 She says, I'm

01:04:28.460 glad you fessed

01:04:29.160 up on the

01:04:29.660 masks.

01:04:30.420 No, fuck

01:04:31.140 you, that

01:04:31.920 didn't happen.

01:04:32.720 I don't know

01:04:33.060 what you just

01:04:33.460 saw.

01:04:35.100 I fessed up

01:04:35.800 on the masks.

01:04:36.660 I had a bad

01:04:37.300 assumption,

01:04:38.500 probably, but I

01:04:42.760 was always on

01:04:43.520 the no mask

01:04:44.580 mandate side.

01:04:45.940 I literally

01:04:46.460 was, I was

01:04:48.740 an activist

01:04:49.320 for, you

01:04:50.460 know, violating

01:04:52.400 the mask

01:04:52.980 mandates.

01:04:54.640 So be

01:04:56.040 very careful.

01:04:57.760 Be very

01:04:58.200 careful.

01:05:03.400 How many

01:05:04.120 of you are

01:05:04.540 following, I

01:05:05.760 forget his

01:05:06.240 name, there's

01:05:07.360 a gentleman

01:05:08.120 who's a

01:05:08.540 married man

01:05:09.100 on Instagram

01:05:09.860 who he

01:05:11.060 does these

01:05:11.480 hilarious

01:05:12.040 reels on

01:05:13.860 things he

01:05:14.300 had to

01:05:14.620 apologize to

01:05:15.620 his wife

01:05:15.980 for.

01:05:16.240 Have you

01:05:17.620 seen those?

01:05:18.420 Things he

01:05:18.920 apologized to

01:05:19.600 his wife

01:05:19.940 for, including

01:05:20.640 he couldn't

01:05:23.040 hear her when

01:05:23.860 she talks to

01:05:24.480 him from

01:05:24.780 another room

01:05:25.340 while he's

01:05:25.700 frying bacon.

01:05:27.200 It's pretty

01:05:27.860 funny.

01:05:28.420 Breathing, yeah,

01:05:29.220 he breathes.

01:05:30.020 Sometimes he

01:05:30.660 faces her in

01:05:31.460 bed.

01:05:34.080 That's one of

01:05:34.800 the complaints.

01:05:35.380 Sometimes he

01:05:36.300 lays in bed

01:05:37.040 facing her.

01:05:38.500 Can't have

01:05:39.200 that.

01:05:39.420 I totally

01:05:42.340 understand that.

01:05:45.480 Oh, yeah,

01:05:46.020 and the

01:05:48.600 wife is 1.00

01:05:49.040 mad at him

01:05:49.600 because she

01:05:50.160 had a dream

01:05:50.600 where he

01:05:51.060 cheated on

01:05:51.760 her in

01:05:52.140 the dream.

01:05:54.380 All right.

01:05:58.980 All right,

01:06:04.220 that's all I

01:06:04.560 got for today.

01:06:05.820 No doubt,

01:06:06.620 one of the

01:06:07.060 finest things

01:06:07.640 you've ever

01:06:08.060 experienced.

01:06:09.420 The live

01:06:10.080 stream to

01:06:10.560 end all

01:06:10.980 live streams,

01:06:11.640 the best

01:06:11.980 thing that's

01:06:12.340 ever happened.

01:06:16.260 People

01:06:16.700 thought you

01:06:17.240 were pushing

01:06:17.660 masks.

01:06:19.300 I was

01:06:19.920 pushing an

01:06:20.440 assumption.

01:06:21.460 See, you

01:06:22.600 can see how

01:06:23.280 people can't 0.97

01:06:24.300 handle any

01:06:26.560 nuance at

01:06:27.140 all.

01:06:28.580 Yeah.

01:06:29.040 You can't

01:06:29.620 say, well,

01:06:30.220 something has

01:06:30.700 some good

01:06:31.160 elements to

01:06:31.960 it, but we

01:06:32.400 shouldn't do

01:06:32.800 it.

01:06:33.840 Like, nobody

01:06:34.600 can handle,

01:06:35.580 well, there's

01:06:35.940 some good

01:06:36.240 parts to that,

01:06:37.200 but overall,

01:06:37.980 we shouldn't

01:06:38.320 do it.

01:06:38.640 Nobody

01:06:39.280 can handle

01:06:39.660 that.

01:06:45.720 Like, peeing

01:06:46.520 or farting 0.69

01:06:47.100 through pants.

01:06:49.220 Really?

01:06:49.780 You think you

01:06:50.560 can piss

01:06:51.580 through your

01:06:51.980 pants just

01:06:52.520 as easily

01:06:52.980 as you

01:06:53.340 can piss

01:06:54.480 when you

01:06:54.740 don't have

01:06:55.040 pants?

01:06:56.360 Like, your

01:06:56.940 arguments were

01:06:57.540 always stupid.

01:06:59.700 My argument

01:07:00.480 had a bad

01:07:01.140 assumption that

01:07:02.840 was backed

01:07:03.320 by science.

01:07:04.640 It just

01:07:05.180 happened to

01:07:05.540 be wrong.

01:07:07.040 But, you

01:07:07.980 know, some

01:07:09.180 of the

01:07:09.600 people who

01:07:09.980 disagreed

01:07:10.980 with me

01:07:11.420 were not

01:07:12.700 even backed

01:07:13.900 by science.

01:07:15.500 All right.

01:07:16.080 So that's

01:07:16.560 all for now.

01:07:20.760 You can't

01:07:21.520 hear the B

01:07:22.040 in subtle,

01:07:22.680 but it's

01:07:22.980 still there.

01:07:25.500 That's

01:07:25.980 blowing my

01:07:26.480 mind.

01:07:27.820 That the

01:07:28.160 word subtle

01:07:28.740 actually has a

01:07:29.460 B in it.

01:07:29.980 it's very

01:07:31.260 subtle.

01:07:33.060 Whoa.

01:07:34.860 Whoa.

01:07:36.000 All right.

01:07:36.840 That's all

01:07:37.240 for now.

01:07:37.620 Talk to you

01:07:37.960 later.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 17, 2022

Episode 1899 Scott Adams： Ye Buys Parler, I Try To Get Canceled Again, And A Peace Plan For Ukraine

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript