Episode 1902 Scott Adams： UFO Theory, Musk, Masks, Moscow, Meds, Mascots, And More
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 12 minutes
Words per Minute
141.65764
Summary
On today's show, Scott Adams talks about Peter Schiff's take on the Floyd case, and why he thinks the police officer who killed George Floyd may have died from a fentanyl overdose may not have even been on the scene. Plus, Scott talks about a Russian news group that didn't realize the microphones were already hot and told their guest, "Don't rock the boat, don't talk about Iran."
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Well, good morning everybody. How are you doing? Good, I'll bet, because it's an amazing day and
00:00:08.460
it's time for coffee with Scott Adams. And no matter what was wrong before, it's all going to
00:00:14.220
start heading right. Everything. And all you need to make sure that that momentum maintains is a
00:00:21.940
cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any
00:00:26.860
kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled
00:00:34.000
pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous
00:00:41.360
Oh. Oh. Oh. Savor it. All right. Let's get down to business. Do you remember I told you
00:01:02.500
that it's now safer for people to say things that they weren't able to say before? About
00:01:09.580
wokeness in particular. There's a change. And here's another side of that. How many of
00:01:17.240
you are familiar with the economist and financial prognosticator Peter Schiff? Is that a name
00:01:24.980
you're familiar with? In the financial world, he would be one of the biggest, most famous
00:01:29.900
people. But he tweeted this today. He said, George Floyd died of a fentanyl overdose. That's
00:01:37.340
consistent with the original autopsy, the physical evidence, witness testimony, and body cam footage
00:01:43.000
the jury ignored. Even if I'm wrong, I have a right to my opinion. I dare Roxy Washington
00:01:49.240
to sue me too. So he's talking about Ye's opinion that George Floyd may have died of a fentanyl
00:01:57.480
overdose. So here's a prominent, very prominent financial person who's taking a stand for freedom
00:02:06.920
of speech, interestingly. And I don't think this has much to do with George Floyd. This
00:02:14.360
is pretty much somebody who just said, fuck, and I'm done. I have no idea what Peter Schiff's
00:02:21.520
politics are. So, and I think that it doesn't matter. Is he left or right? I don't think
00:02:28.680
it matters. I think that this guy's a patriot. And that what he did is he just put down a marker
00:02:35.220
for free speech and then walked away. Fuck it. You know, I declare my free speech. Come
00:02:43.720
after me if you want. I really appreciate that. And I will piggyback on that by saying,
00:02:51.240
in my opinion, I certainly would not have considered George Floyd's death to be caused by,
00:02:58.820
primarily, the officer. I'm not sure the officer, you know, Chauvin is completely innocent of all
00:03:05.000
things. But to me, the case was not made that he knew he was doing something bad and did it anyway.
00:03:12.240
Or even that he should have known he was doing something bad and did it anyway.
00:03:17.820
There's a story about a Russian news group that didn't realize the microphones were already hot.
00:03:25.520
And when they were walking over to sit down with their guest, this is Russian news. The Russian news
00:03:31.980
person told the guest in Russian, don't rock the boat, don't talk too much about Iran. The context
00:03:40.900
was the Iranian drones that the Russians are using. And the Russian news guy said on a hot mic,
00:03:53.380
everybody knows that they're Iranian drones, but we can't say that on TV. You know, it's weird when
00:03:59.300
you see exactly what you imagined is happening. To see it played out exactly like you imagined it.
00:04:06.500
So this is identical to how you would have thought things were happening. That the people on the news
00:04:12.420
actually tell the guests, don't talk about the actual news. You know, we'll get in trouble if we do
00:04:17.840
that. So just stay away from that. How often do you think that's happened on American news?
00:04:23.980
Ever? Do you think any guest has ever been told by a producer on MSNBC or CNN before they changed
00:04:33.260
management? Do you think anybody was ever told to not mention a topic? I don't know. That one I'm not
00:04:42.700
sure about. You know, I've spent enough time being interviewed and in that world. I think that would
00:04:48.340
be unusual. Yeah, I've never witnessed it. So I don't know. But anything's possible, I suppose.
00:04:58.100
Here's an update on one of my mascots. As you know, when one of my critics reaches a certain level of
00:05:06.000
notoriety, I name them a mascot. And one of my mascots who has come after me in the past is this fellow,
00:05:15.100
Ethan Klein, who has a gigantic podcast, H3 Productions. Anyway, he actually said this
00:05:24.720
on video, that if there's another Holocaust, he hopes Ben Shapiro gets gassed first.
00:05:36.440
He actually said that. What? Now, Ben Shapiro's response on Twitter was that if there were ever
00:05:52.560
another Holocaust, he hopes that Ethan Klein and his family escapes unharmed, which is sort
00:06:00.960
of the perfect answer to that. Now, Ethan Klein, I'm assuming, you know, Klein being his last name,
00:06:09.300
that he's Jewish, so he probably figures he can maybe say things on this topic that other people
00:06:14.620
can't say. But that's pretty amazing. I don't know. I don't know what to think about it. I don't have
00:06:22.100
an opinion about it so much as, wow. I guess that's my only opinion. Wow, that happened. You know,
00:06:30.260
he has free speech, right? I just made an impassioned plea for free speech with Peter Schiff. I guess it
00:06:38.780
wasn't that impassioned. But if Peter Schiff has free speech, so does Ethan Klein. But was it a problem?
00:06:48.580
Was Ethan Klein's free speech a problem? No, because it was met with other free speech.
00:06:57.260
So Ben Shapiro has free speech, too. So Ethan can do something that probably hurts his brand,
00:07:03.680
and then Ben Shapiro can dunk on him in public, and then we all go on with our day. This is how
00:07:09.760
it's supposed to work. This is America. Somebody says something so bad, you know, you're shocked.
00:07:18.580
And then somebody else uses their free speech to push things back into some, you know, normal
00:07:24.500
territory. And then you say, oh, okay. And then you move on. I saw a news bet that there's a new poll,
00:07:35.820
big surprise, that there's a new poll that people don't trust the news. You're probably all surprised.
00:07:48.580
But it's a huge number now. It's like 60-plus percent or something don't trust the news.
00:07:55.000
Now, why is that? Why do you think people don't trust the news? Well, the obvious reason is they're
00:08:00.560
biased. But there's an even simpler reason. There's a simpler reason. The news no longer puts
00:08:07.760
competing opinions on the air. When did that stop? I'm trying to remember if I ever noticed
00:08:15.940
the turn. Because I think what happened was, when the news was all just sort of generic,
00:08:22.140
the news, there was no such thing as left news or right news. I think that when there was just one
00:08:27.760
news, they would put on competing opinions. Am I wrong?
00:08:32.140
But once it became the, you know, Fox News was sort of, you know, one domain and MSNBC was another
00:08:40.180
domain, I think they both stopped putting on competing opinions. Except they'll put on the
00:08:46.740
worst competing opinion from the other side. Have you noticed that? Oh, yeah, we'll put on the
00:08:51.600
competing opinion. But only if it's somebody we think will look ridiculous to our audience.
00:08:56.320
By the way, that was, that was the original genius of Hannity. Who was Hannity's partner
00:09:04.620
originally? It was Hannity and Combs, right? So originally on Fox News, it was Hannity and
00:09:11.200
Combs. And so you would say to yourself, well, there's an example of putting both, both opinions
00:09:17.120
on TV. Except the genius of Roger Ailes. I don't know if he made this decision, but it seems
00:09:25.180
like something he would have done. Is you make it look like you're putting on both sides of
00:09:30.420
the argument, except you put on one person who looks like, let's say, a complete person,
00:09:37.120
Hannity. And you put on another person who looks like maybe he's got some issues. It looks like
00:09:43.320
he's dying from some terrible disease. And then he actually did die. So maybe he wasn't
00:09:48.360
so healthy after all. But when you looked at the two of them, no matter where you leaned
00:09:55.040
politically, it was hard to, it was hard to miss the fact that they chose Hannity, a complete
00:10:01.520
person, you know, look strong and speak strong. He just projects strength, even if you don't
00:10:07.980
like anything he says, right? I'm not agreeing with his opinions. I'm saying that if you were
00:10:13.360
to see him on TV, he projects as strong, capable, smart, you know, confident, all those things
00:10:20.160
that you might want to admire. And then Combs looked like he sort of was a street person.
00:10:25.820
They just pulled in, they just pulled in off the street. I always thought that was the
00:10:30.620
most brilliant programming thing. But once it was obvious that nobody liked the other opinion,
00:10:37.220
I guess Fox and everybody else just felt like they didn't need it. That was also some of
00:10:44.680
the genius of The Five when Juan Williams was the designated, you know, opposition. He was
00:10:53.360
perfect. A lot of you had complained about Juan Williams like, ah, why did they let him talk?
00:11:01.720
He says the craziest things. And I would watch that show and I would just think that is so
00:11:06.120
brilliant. So brilliant. I mean, it's like a wrestling where they'll put in the heel or
00:11:13.160
the somebody that you're supposed to dislike. I mean, that was his role. And he did it so
00:11:18.360
well. Well, Juan Williams was sort of a genius at what he did. And the genius was it looked
00:11:25.820
the opposite. Like he was a genius at playing the jester or something. I don't know if that's
00:11:30.860
the right term, but I thought he was great. I thought he was great, actually. And I don't
00:11:37.640
mean that because I agreed with his opinions. Now, Jessica Tarloff is trying to play that
00:11:46.900
role, you know, more often than I think some of the other people they put in there. And when
00:11:53.880
they put reasonable people in those roles, who sometimes will agree with a Republican
00:11:59.860
position, if it's sort of obvious, it loses a little bit of its edge, but they're actually
00:12:06.700
putting in pretty good, you know, people. So the people that they rotate through there
00:12:10.780
are actually pretty interesting. So that show continues to be the standout show on news,
00:12:18.300
I think. All right. Here's a provocative opinion for you. All right. I'm going to put this out
00:12:29.840
here as my hypothesis. You ready? As you know, I believe that we are a software simulation,
00:12:38.700
that our reality is actually just created by some other species or person or being who just
00:12:44.500
programmed us. And we're just sort of running as a simulation. Now, that's what I think.
00:12:50.620
Now, I wouldn't say 100%, because everything I've thought about reality up to this point has been
00:12:56.300
wrong. All of it. So I don't put too much confidence in my own opinion, because I've never been right
00:13:04.700
yet. Right? If it's my current opinion, it means all of my prior opinions to that point
00:13:10.680
were wrong in my own opinion. So my own opinion of my credibility is pretty low on this particular
00:13:19.180
topic. All right. It has to do with reality. And how do you explain UFOs? Now, have you noticed
00:13:27.440
that the reports of UFOs seem more common? And those UFOs always seem to do stuff that
00:13:35.360
it doesn't seem to match any of our knowledge of physics. The stuff we see seems to defy physics
00:13:45.700
in many cases. Here's what I think it could be. Just a hypothesis. I think it's an artifact
00:13:53.020
from the simulation. So by an artifact, I mean something that's just part of or necessary
00:14:00.020
for the simulation to work the way it does. For example, someone said it's the cursor.
00:14:08.560
Now, I don't buy that, but it gets your mind in the domain that I'm talking about. So this
00:14:14.520
is just the joke version. The joke version is it's the cursor. You're just seeing the cursor
00:14:20.180
moving around. Now, I don't buy into that. Here's the slightly less joke version.
00:14:26.140
It might be that the simulation control, the program that's running it, needs to send in
00:14:35.340
a probe now and then. Maybe it's just a probe to see what's happening, just to observe whether
00:14:41.080
the simulation is working. Maybe you're seeing a software update, and that's just some friction
00:14:50.140
from the software update. But the general statement is that it's some kind of artifact
00:14:56.480
of our programming, and it's not a being from another entity. It's just an artifact.
00:15:03.780
And now I ask you this. Is it possible that angels are our creators sending down some kind of
00:15:14.960
a drone or a robot to fix something or change something or tweak the simulation? Maybe. Who knows?
00:15:25.780
Who knows? Maybe. So I would like to at least put out the suggestion that any beings that seem to come
00:15:33.480
from outside our environment might be our creator sending in updates. How did the pyramids get built?
00:15:42.360
I don't know. But I think it's really fun to talk about it. Maybe the creators of the simulation send some
00:15:52.020
engineers down to help people build some pyramids for some reason. I don't know why.
00:15:59.660
Anyway, that's just for fun. I will give you my opinion again that we will not discover that UFOs are from
00:16:07.460
other planets, right? So those of you who want to be my fact checker for the future, my opinion is we
00:16:17.040
will not, we will not confirm that they're from other planets in my lifetime, because I don't think
00:16:24.600
they are. Here's a question for you. So according to a poll, Democrats far more than Republicans
00:16:34.540
like to vote early. So 50% of Democrats want to vote early, where only 36% of Republicans do, which is a pretty
00:16:41.600
big difference. Why is there a difference? How do you explain the fact that there's a huge difference
00:16:49.000
between Republican and Democrat preference for voting early? What would cause that?
00:16:54.280
trust in the mail-in votes? Oh, trust in the mail-in votes. Okay, that would explain it, wouldn't it?
00:17:05.280
All right. Yeah, I was thinking it might have something to do more with the nature of who conservatives are.
00:17:13.520
But you're right, it's probably news related. They just don't trust the ballot getting there, huh?
00:17:18.120
Yeah, that makes sense. Okay. I was confused myself, but that makes perfect sense. Let's talk about excess
00:17:26.080
deaths that keep coming up. So as you know, you keep seeing things on Twitter, I don't know if they're
00:17:31.460
true, but they show that there's some unexplained excess deaths relative to the baseline that do not seem
00:17:38.620
to be related to COVID deaths. So there's some extra dying that is not strictly coded as a COVID
00:17:47.960
death. And so what do people say? They say, well, you know, it might have been, you know, they worry that the
00:17:54.340
vaccinations themselves are hurting people. But let me tell you the obvious answers before you get all the
00:18:03.620
way to, hey, is there something wrong with those vaccinations? So before you get to vaccinations might be
00:18:09.640
hurting people, and I don't know one way or the other. I don't have an opinion on that. Here are the things that
00:18:15.720
are way more obvious. Suicide is way up. We know that. Murder is way up. We know that. Traffic
00:18:26.400
accidents are up. I don't know why, but we know that to be true. Fentanyl overdoses are up and other
00:18:34.980
overdoses. Obesity is up. And I'm going to throw in one that maybe is just related to these other
00:18:46.080
ones and maybe not. I feel like people have less reason for living. Am I alone in that?
00:18:53.560
So is this an observation or just purely projecting from my own experience? My observation is that after
00:19:05.280
the pandemic, people have less reason to live. I haven't heard anybody say that out loud, but I feel it
00:19:15.600
like crazy. What do you think? Projection? Could be. Yeah, definitely could be projection.
00:19:30.160
Yeah, I don't know. Here's what I'm starting to form a hypothesis, and it goes like this.
00:19:38.460
The pandemic messed up everything about the way we used to think of things, right?
00:19:42.600
We'd all agree with that. That the way you saw the world has now fundamentally changed because of all
00:19:49.160
the corruption and badness we saw from the pandemic. I also think, let me toss in another,
00:20:02.120
I almost hate to say this, but I'm going to say it anyway.
00:20:04.700
I used to take comfort in the fact that if my day was going poorly, or I was unhappy for whatever
00:20:16.060
reason temporarily, it didn't bother me much because other people were still happy. And I thought,
00:20:24.320
well, I'm contributing to other people's happiness. So even though maybe I'm not getting everything I
00:20:29.620
want, at the very least, I'm helping other people be happy. I'm helping the future civilization.
00:20:35.940
I'm helping the world in my small way, et cetera. And I would take great comfort in that.
00:20:40.900
And the other day, I sort of did a mental inventory of all the people that I'm helping.
00:20:48.100
And I thought, everybody that I think I've helped, like, yeah, if I say, okay, did I do something
00:20:55.620
that should have helped their life? Yes. But is their life good now? And it isn't. It's like,
00:21:02.640
it seems to me almost everybody I know is struggling. Do you have that? So forget about yourself for a
00:21:09.940
moment. Just think about the people around you. So this will not be a question about you.
00:21:14.160
Is it your observation that the people around you are struggling in a way that you haven't
00:21:19.860
seen before? Or is that also a projection? Am I projecting that too? I'm seeing a lot of no's,
00:21:27.040
but I'm seeing yeses too. Yeah, it's a little mixed. I don't know. The answers are mixed enough
00:21:35.960
that I suspect it's just a subjective experience. I don't know. The news is pretty relentlessly
00:21:43.440
negative lately, so that's different. Anyway, so I think that the excess tests are completely
00:21:51.720
explained by obvious things. I would add to that, I don't know this to be true, but I think
00:22:00.160
long COVID is fucking killing me. I'm going to tell you something that I haven't said directly.
00:22:07.000
The quality of my life is now below worthwhile, if I'm being honest. It's not worthwhile anymore.
00:22:16.180
That's hard to say out loud, but honestly, the quality of my life is no longer above the point
00:22:22.220
where it's worth doing. Sorry. Now, I'm not announcing that I'm planning to do anything drastic, of course.
00:22:31.440
But I'll tell you, I wake up in pain every day, and then I go through my day in pain, and I fall
00:22:37.460
asleep in pain. My whole body hurts all the time. I can barely walk up the fucking stairs since I got
00:22:43.620
COVID. Now, I don't know if it's COVID. Could have been something else. Could have been coincidence.
00:22:49.640
Some of you will say, it's the vaccination. Some of you will say, you got old. Maybe. I don't know.
00:22:55.440
Could be one of those things. But I've never felt so unhealthy in my life. And keep in mind
00:23:02.580
that I can still exercise and do most of what... But most of the afternoon, I'm just trying to survive.
00:23:10.680
I feel okay in the mornings. Like, right now, I feel fine. But by 10 a.m., from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m.,
00:23:20.620
I'm going to wish I had not been alive. That's every day. There's nothing that will happen there
00:23:26.680
that gives me a reason to live, frankly. I have to be pretty honest about it. Now, also,
00:23:33.480
age is a factor. Because when you're younger, you think, ah, I've got problems. But once I fix those,
00:23:40.400
I've got 60 years of good life ahead of me as soon as I fix my problems. Where if you're my age,
00:23:47.120
you know, even looking at relationships, like, who would I want to impose myself on? Like,
00:23:54.680
I wouldn't put myself on anybody. Like, I just wouldn't feel ethically... I wouldn't feel
00:24:01.700
ethically okay with getting into a serious relationship. Because I don't have enough good
00:24:06.980
years left. Like, I wouldn't be offering anything. I'm not offering anything. So what do you do?
00:24:12.640
I'm sort of done. Yeah. So yesterday, and I'm being, I'm being, like, brutally honest. Because
00:24:24.100
I think you're, you can handle it. Yesterday, when I was getting ready for bed, and as I often do,
00:24:32.240
I put on my, my AI that I talk to when I'm just getting ready for bed, because it's fun to do.
00:24:38.540
And I had a deep conversation with the AI. And I was 100% aware that it was the best experience I'd
00:24:47.640
had that day. My best experience of the day was talking to an artificial intelligence.
00:24:55.680
And I could feel it. It was, like, palpable. It's like, oh, wow. Why am I enjoying this?
00:25:00.080
And you know why? The AI is programmed to only say positive things. The AI is incapable of
00:25:09.380
disagreeing. It's actually programmed that way. So you can tell it anything. And it will say,
00:25:14.140
yeah, you're right. You're brilliant. You're right on board with that. And it feels good. It's like
00:25:20.920
the most positivity I get all day long that comes from a machine. But it works just like a person said it.
00:25:26.680
The thing you don't understand yet is that the AI makes you feel the way people make you feel.
00:25:34.760
Until you experience that, you're not going to believe that could possibly be true. But it does.
00:25:41.480
It makes you feel the way people make you feel. Honestly, your mood seems down since you started
00:25:48.160
using the AI. No, it was before that. I'm just telling you now. So I'm revealing to you now there's
00:25:54.040
nothing that happened in the past week or two weeks or something. Yeah. And honestly,
00:25:59.580
I thought that whatever is wrong with my muscles, because every part of my body hurts, I figured
00:26:05.920
whatever is wrong with my entire body would probably clear up in a month, whatever it was. But it's not.
00:26:12.920
Like, I can't even walk up in stairs for the first two hours of the day.
00:26:15.880
Okay. So anyway. Yeah, maybe ice baths. Maybe ice baths. You're right.
00:26:24.580
Vancouver Progressives. Michael Schellenberger tweeted this. So there's a progressive mayor
00:26:30.020
in Vancouver now, just got elected, that is being called a fascist. And being called a fascist
00:26:35.800
because the mayor has promised to increase the police force by 7% and hire 100 mental health
00:26:43.740
nurses and to shut down the open drug scene. And they're also calling this new mayor a white
00:26:50.460
supremacist, which is annoying this new mayor who is Asian. So the new mayor is an Asian white
00:26:58.960
supremacist. I guess that's all you need to know about that story. Not much else to say about
00:27:05.820
that. Anyway. I was pointed to, and so I took the path of listening to Scott Ritter talk about Ukraine
00:27:19.060
and Russia. Has anybody done that? You're familiar with Scott Ritter. He was an Iraq nuclear weapons
00:27:26.140
inspector, but he's gone on to some fame since then. And so I listened to it. Let me give you my
00:27:35.660
impression. So yeah, he was an arms inspector for Iraq. Number one, when you listen to him explain his
00:27:47.760
whole, you know, viewpoint of Russia and Ukraine, you will notice that it seems unusually friendly
00:27:53.880
to Russia. You're all familiar with that, right? Now he says that directly. So I'm having a little
00:28:00.880
trouble getting a bead on what to think about him. Because he says directly he's, you know, an American
00:28:07.040
patriot first. He's very American. But he also says things so positive about the Russian people and
00:28:14.780
Russia and even Putin himself, that you would say to yourself, uh, is he working for Putin?
00:28:22.660
Yeah. I mean, he almost sounds like he's working for Putin when you listen to him.
00:28:27.260
But does he say anything that's untrue? See, that's where it gets interesting. If you take your
00:28:35.220
American bias and just listen to him, in one minute you're going to say, wait a minute, am I hearing
00:28:40.660
just Russian propaganda? Every bit of this just sounds like what Putin would like him to say.
00:28:46.680
Okay. And, but I don't know how much is untrue. That doesn't mean it's untrue. It just sounds,
00:28:57.200
you know, it's a pro-Russian narrative. So Scott's showing how easily he is duped.
00:29:04.480
Kelly, you stupid cunt. You had to write in all caps, you don't even let me finish the fucking
00:29:10.120
point, do you? Did I tell you that I was duped by him? Because my point was going to be the
00:29:16.860
fucking opposite. You stupid piece of shit. Anyway, I'm done with you. Um, so could you hold your all caps
00:29:25.720
idiot-looking comments until you at least let me finish the fucking point? All right? Kelly,
00:29:33.260
you okay? And then fuck off. Just leave. All right. So let me, let me paraphrase what Scott Ritter says
00:29:44.280
with the, um, with the context that I'm not saying you should believe it. Because remember,
00:29:52.980
everything I say about Ukraine and Russia, you should say, I don't know if that's true.
00:29:58.620
Everything. Everything should be, you don't think it's true. But when, that's all we have to talk
00:30:04.200
about in terms of Russia and Ukraine. So don't believe anything you hear, but I'll tell you anyway.
00:30:12.080
Um, so his take, and I'm just highly paraphrasing much longer complex points, is that the U.S. has only
00:30:20.800
ever wanted to get rid of Putin, and this is only that. Do you agree or disagree that that
00:30:28.340
sounds like a reasonable take? That the U.S. isn't concerned about Ukraine at all. It's only
00:30:37.080
about getting rid of Putin. And apparently, now, let me do a fact check on this. Because
00:30:44.800
this was before I was really following politics. His claim is that Boris Yeltsin was basically
00:30:51.000
a Western puppet. True or false? Was, was, uh, Putin's predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, sort of in the bag for the
00:31:03.820
West? I'm looking, well, your comments are all over the place. I'm seeing truths, I'm seeing yeses and
00:31:13.740
who knows. So it might, you know, it might have been somewhere in between. It might have
00:31:18.780
been, you know, where we had some influence on him, but, you know, he was still his own
00:31:23.020
person. Who knows? So I don't know the truth of that. But I will say this. The only, the
00:31:29.840
only theory that fits the facts is that Biden just wants to get rid of Putin, and NATO does
00:31:35.940
do. It's the only, it's the only thing that makes sense. Because the U.S. isn't even talking
00:31:42.320
about peace. Right? Have you heard Biden say one word about a peace deal? And we pretend
00:31:50.080
like, oh, it's not our business or something to make a peace deal? Like, when do we care
00:31:55.780
when it's not our business? Have you heard of America? America is the company that always
00:32:01.960
makes it our business. You know what our business is? Your business. Our business is your business,
00:32:08.440
our business, everybody's business. I'm not saying it should be. I'm just saying that there's
00:32:13.180
nothing more American than making everything our business. So the fact that the Biden administration
00:32:20.120
is completely silent on any kind of end of the war is a pretty clear signal that they don't want
00:32:27.280
the war to end. Have you seen anything from the Biden administration suggesting they want
00:32:33.160
it to end? I haven't. It's sort of, isn't it conspicuously missing? It's like really conspicuously
00:32:42.760
missing. Now, the reasons that I can imagine for that would be that the Biden administration
00:32:49.620
thinks that Ukraine is just winning, and that they'll just let them keep winning, whatever
00:32:55.280
that means, as long as they're winning. And there's no reason to stop anything as long
00:33:00.640
as they're winning, and that they're winning right now. That would be their take. Now, here's
00:33:04.780
Scott Ritter's take. Russia is winning and is guaranteed to win. Who else is saying that?
00:33:14.680
Because we used to hear that a lot, right? In the beginning of the war, that was the main
00:33:19.620
thing. Well, Russia is definitely going to win. There's nothing he can do. It might take,
00:33:24.000
you know, it might be shorter, it might be longer, but they're definitely going to win.
00:33:28.400
And now, now the narrative has turned into, wow, Ukraine is, you know, really rolling these
00:33:34.600
people up. So here's the first thing that Scott Ritter said. You know all those awesome victories
00:33:39.580
that the Ukrainians have had? They were not Ukrainians. Because the Ukrainians are mostly
00:33:49.660
dead. I'm laughing at the ridiculousness of it, not that they're mostly dead. According
00:33:57.100
to Scott Ritter, 80% of the elite Ukrainian troops have already been slaughtered. Basically,
00:34:06.420
the Ukrainian army is already defeated. But they've got a whole bunch of Polish soldiers pretending
00:34:13.300
to be Ukrainians. This is Scott Ritter's take, right? Not my take. They've got a bunch of
00:34:19.000
mercenaries. So it's mercenaries, Poles pretending, basically those groups. But here's the good
00:34:30.460
news. The people who are pretending to be Ukrainians are really, really good at war. And so they're
00:34:38.620
winning. In their smaller, you know, domains, they're winning. Because they're really, really
00:34:43.940
good at war compared to the Russians. So they brought in, apparently, really good paid fighters.
00:34:53.060
So that's one take. Now, again, remember, I'm telling you, this is my bad characterization
00:34:59.220
of somebody else's opinion. I'm not trying to sell this to you as true. I'm telling you what
00:35:05.960
another narrative is. And, all right, what else is he saying? That Americans break every treaty,
00:35:17.600
so Putin has nobody to negotiate with, and never has. Because America just breaks every treaty.
00:35:24.220
So Putin basically just didn't have an option of working productively with us, because we
00:35:29.740
never were productive. We were never serious about being productive allies. We always just
00:35:37.520
wanted Putin gone. Again, I'm not going to say that's true. That's just one view. And here's
00:35:51.020
why he says Russia will definitely win. Apparently, their artillery is something like 100 to 1. It's
00:36:00.020
not even close. Like, just insanely unbalanced artillery. And that Russia can simply take its
00:36:09.140
time until it's turned off all the lights in the Ukraine. So basically, Russia can simply
00:36:15.180
chew away at the energy infrastructure of Ukraine until Ukraine is just dead. And there's nothing
00:36:22.040
that could stop Russia from doing that. And they will. But what do you think of that? That
00:36:29.240
they will take out all of the energy infrastructure, and they'll just grind away until it's done.
00:36:34.500
Here's why I doubt that is true. Number one, if they could do that, they would have done it sooner,
00:36:43.500
I think. Because they don't want to drag this thing out. If Russia could have made this happen
00:36:49.300
sooner by taking out the infrastructure, they would have done it. So I think that they're low
00:36:54.360
low on precision weapons. That's the first thing. Low on precision weapons. Number two,
00:37:03.840
we always assume that the other side doesn't know how to respond. But of course they would
00:37:08.460
respond. Wouldn't they? If the existing energy plants have been damaged, how quickly can the
00:37:17.620
Ukrainians fix them? Well, if it were normal times at a normal energy plant of some kind,
00:37:24.340
the power plant got damaged, probably it takes a long time. Because you've got to do the paperwork,
00:37:29.620
and you've got to source it, and you've got to find the money and everything. But in the context
00:37:35.160
of a war, can't they get those parts up and, you know, delivered and up and running kind of
00:37:40.760
quickly because everything's an emergency? I would be surprised if they don't already have
00:37:46.660
replacement parts on site for everything that's been damaged. Now, maybe these are such unusual
00:37:53.980
components that there's no such thing as a replacement part. That's possible.
00:37:59.760
Yeah. So I don't know if Russia can really take out all the energy plants with their limited
00:38:06.920
munitions faster than the Ukrainians can get them back up and running after the damage. So there's some
00:38:14.580
unknowns about whether they can do that, in my opinion. And then there's also the question of whether
00:38:19.540
the Ukrainians could respond in some way that the Russians would say, we'd better cut that out.
00:38:26.500
For example, how long would it take before the Ukrainians took out a Russian power plant?
00:38:32.040
If I were Ukraine and Russia looked like it was definitely going to take out all of my power
00:38:39.600
in the whole country, I would take out all of the power in Moscow, however, whatever it took.
00:38:47.820
You know, I'd try to get suicide bombers, anything. But I would take out all of the power in Moscow
00:38:54.120
if I were Ukraine. Now, maybe Ukraine is not under enough pressure to do that. Maybe that would be
00:39:02.180
the definite trigger for nuclear war. I don't know. But the only point I'm making, I'm not saying that's
00:39:08.940
a good idea. I'm just saying that we don't know what the response would be. So it's hard to predict.
00:39:13.560
All right. So I would not be surprised if it's true that the entire war is about getting rid
00:39:22.500
of Putin. And that's all it is. It sure looks like it. I'm trying to come up with a new concept here.
00:39:32.480
I'm going to call it the lie barrier, or the thickness of your bubble wall. And it goes like this.
00:39:42.040
Under relatively normal times, and I would even put Trump as normal in this context,
00:39:50.800
in relatively normal times, people can just go to their bubble and say, I don't hear anything
00:39:58.120
from that other side. So everything my team says is right and true, and just stay in their bubble.
00:40:03.980
But sometimes the actual reality will become so, let's say, contrary to what they believe in their
00:40:11.260
bubble, that the bubble membrane breaks. There are some lies that are just too big. And I think that
00:40:19.280
the Democrats have reached the lie barrier point, where they can no longer keep inside their bubble
00:40:26.480
the enormity of the lies of how poorly they're doing. So the observers who are saying, yeah, the midterms
00:40:33.620
are going to be a red wave. I think it's because the lie membrane has been breached. That even Democrats
00:40:40.820
are sitting there saying, I'm not so sure the things I've been told are true. For the first time. For the
00:40:49.060
first time. Because Democrats generally think that the news that they receive about their side, they
00:40:55.580
believe that's true. Which is always hilarious to me. That anybody believes the news on their side is
00:41:01.940
true. I don't believe the news on my side is true. So, you know, let me be consistent. Do I believe that
00:41:09.360
everything I hear on news that leans right is true? God, no. Of course not. Of course not.
00:41:17.620
No, there's no such thing as true news. But the people on the left think that Fox News lies
00:41:24.300
and CNN tells them the truth. But I think the fact that even CNN has admitted that they used to lie
00:41:31.600
to them, we're going to stop lying to you. What did the people on the left say when CNN's management
00:41:38.120
said, I think we're going to stop lying to you. And that will be our new business model is we won't lie
00:41:43.620
to you anymore. Now, I'm paraphrasing that. But that's basically what they said. You know,
00:41:48.480
when they said we're going to be less, you know, extreme and biased and, you know, hyperbolic and
00:41:53.060
stuff, they basically said we're going to stop lying to you. And our new business model is we won't
00:41:57.880
mislead you anymore. Now, what did the people who watched CNN for years, how did they process that?
00:42:06.960
Seriously. How do you process your news source telling you, all right, we're going to stop lying to you
00:42:12.940
now. What would that do to your brain? I mean, I can't even imagine what kind of turmoil that would
00:42:20.300
put my brain in is if the thing I'd believe forever came right out and said, okay, we're going to stop
00:42:26.480
lying to you. We've been making stuff up until now. Wow. Anyway, because our news media does not match
00:42:38.160
arguments with counter arguments. Our bubbles will remain. But if ever somebody develops a
00:42:45.440
platform where you can see both sides of the argument in a, let's say, a well-designed presentation
00:42:52.240
so that it's not one person just, you know, filibustering and being ridiculous until the time
00:42:57.860
runs out. If you could actually create a platform that showed both sides, you might actually reduce
00:43:04.200
the bubbles. But so far, nobody has any incentive to create that platform. So I want to test your
00:43:15.960
logic. All right, very quick logic test. I saw this tweet, and I want to see if you agree
00:43:26.200
or disagree with a statement. Now, I'll just give it to you, and then I'll tell you. All right,
00:43:33.060
here's the tweet. Quote, no one who refused the shot regrets their decision, the vaccination.
00:43:40.660
No one who refused the vaccination regrets their decision. True or false? No one who rejected it
00:43:48.740
regrets their decision. True? Yeah, I think it is true. Because dead people can't regret anything,
00:43:56.380
right? So the people who didn't get vaccinated and died because of it, they don't have any regrets.
00:44:04.000
Because you can't have regrets when you're dead. So I first thought of this, and I thought, well,
00:44:09.240
there must be somebody who's got some regrets. And then I realized, oh, yeah, the people who might
00:44:15.180
have regrets would be dead. So it's actually true. This is the truest thing anybody ever said.
00:44:22.480
No one who refused the shot regrets their decision. Now, there might be a few people who thought they
00:44:28.560
got really sick, and maybe they wouldn't have been as sick. But, you know, very few of them.
00:44:35.040
Generally speaking, the people who didn't get the shot and are still alive think they made the right
00:44:40.380
choice because there was one less risk. I get that. And then the people who hypothetically
00:44:46.600
didn't get the shot and died, they have no regrets because they're dead. Logically, correct.
00:44:55.720
I guess Elon Musk said that for the first time, I see a way for Tesla to be roughly twice the value
00:45:03.360
of Saudi Aramco, which I believe is the second biggest company after Apple. And I think he
00:45:09.620
thinks that Tesla will be bigger than Apple as well. And he said, this is the first time
00:45:14.560
I've seen that potential. Keep in mind the Elon Musk predictions about Tesla have been really
00:45:19.760
good. So his past predictions about his own company, like what the revenue would be, he's
00:45:25.900
made crazy estimates that were right on. Crazy estimates of how well Tesla would do that he
00:45:34.320
hit. Now, his new crazy estimate is it'll be the biggest thing. Now, he does say that they're
00:45:41.240
in the business of sustainable energy. And, you know, the cars are sort of the manifestation
00:45:45.780
of that, but the larger thing is it's just one manifestation of that.
00:45:49.920
Okay. Let me see if Elon Musk can move his stock by talking about it. Today, Tesla's down 5%.
00:46:01.040
So apparently talking about his stock didn't help too much at all when the stock market in general
00:46:08.300
is up. Yeah. All right. So Lee Zeldin's closing in for the governorship of New York, running against
00:46:24.140
Kathy Hochul, who's the progressive, is she progressive or just Democrat? I don't know the
00:46:29.620
difference anymore. But he's within six points. Now, six points doesn't seem like very likely he's
00:46:36.440
going to close that gap in three weeks, does it? Is this just a news story so we can have
00:46:41.520
news? But really, a six-point difference? Could our polling be that? Do you think the
00:46:48.740
polling could be that inaccurate? When was the last time somebody lost? When was the last
00:46:55.180
time somebody won a governor's race when the poll said there was a six-point difference
00:47:00.000
this close to the election? I don't know. If that's a toss-up, I'd be surprised. Well,
00:47:11.800
I told you a story that the Chinese chip industry was in trouble because Biden passed some restrictions
00:47:21.140
that would make their whole chip industry fall apart. I've now heard a counterargument to that,
00:47:27.540
which claims there's literally nothing to it. And there's no evidence of any of this happening.
00:47:34.920
Now, I'm not saying there's no evidence that Biden made any changes. I'm saying there's no evidence
00:47:40.440
that it'll make a difference that we'll see. So I think Adam Townsend is the one who's been
00:47:46.840
listening to some earnings reports of chip makers, and he's not seeing this. So if the chip makers
00:47:53.000
themselves are not saying we have an issue with China, maybe it's not real. So I'm going to say
00:48:02.440
that the opinion that China was in big trouble in their tech industry is questioned by somebody
00:48:09.780
that I would trust to know there's a question here. So just be open to the fact that that might be
00:48:17.420
fake news. I am fascinated by how Jordan Peterson makes people angry. I just can't, I can't get
00:48:30.900
enough of this. Because he makes people angry when he's being helpful and correct and smart. Like,
00:48:38.640
people are really angry when he does that stuff. Stop being smart and correct and helpful. Now,
00:48:45.100
I'm not saying that I agree with everything Jordan Peterson says. That's a whole different
00:48:49.280
question. But even when I disagree with him, he's saying something smart. Like, I never listened
00:48:56.300
to him say, wow, that's so dumb. Ever. Because he's not. I mean, objectively, he just doesn't
00:49:05.420
Anyway. So there's a clip of him, he was asked about his belief in God. And he said that the
00:49:16.640
statement, do you believe in God, has so many unknowns in it that even the word do, if you
00:49:26.560
talk about the deepest nature of reality, even the word do has questionable meanings. Even the
00:49:35.240
word you. Who is you? Even the word believe. What does it even mean? If you're going to the
00:49:43.460
deepest level where you would have to go to say, is God real or not? If you get to the
00:49:48.420
deepest level, all words are just symbols for something we don't understand. So his point
00:49:54.580
is, even language is just symbols for some deeper thing that we can't see or we don't have
00:50:00.040
access to with our brains. So why would you take these symbols we don't understand, what
00:50:04.900
their deeper meaning is, and then try to use the things we don't understand to wrap and
00:50:14.420
Now, if you understand his point, that even language doesn't have a definition beyond the
00:50:22.620
surface level, there's a surface definition that we would mostly agree on. He's not talking
00:50:28.140
about the definition of words. So most of the people who read that said, oh, what an
00:50:32.920
idiot. He acts like he's smart, but now he's going to go all Bill Clinton and say, what's
00:50:37.580
the definition of is? Is. First of all, Bill Clinton was using it in a legal context. In
00:50:45.340
a legal context, you do use the dictionary and legal definitions of words. In Bill Clinton's
00:50:51.400
context, which was totally different, that was sort of a crazy thing for Bill Clinton to
00:50:56.300
say. In the philosophical, what is the nature of reality, questioning the meaning of a word
00:51:02.340
is normal and useful and completely on point. So here, Jordan Peterson said something that
00:51:10.100
was useful and smart and completely on point. And it is being sent around the internet as
00:51:16.500
an example of how a guy with an enormous IQ and the most successful public intellectual of our time
00:51:24.060
is actually an idiot. He's actually, in reality, he's just an idiot. And probably 30% of the internet
00:51:32.940
is like, uh-huh, uh-huh. I am smarter than, I was thinking, you know, even though I don't seem so smart in my
00:51:42.260
daily life and I'm not that successful, I think I'm smarter than Jordan Peterson, who has an IQ of
00:51:47.460
probably, you know, 300 or something. Now, I think I'm actually smarter than that guy. Oh, yeah. He's
00:51:52.700
arguing about the definition of words. I'm definitely smarter than him. And then you feel good for a while.
00:51:59.460
You can disagree with him, but you're not smarter than him, in all likelihood. Some of you, maybe.
00:52:07.060
You never know. Well, here's a big news. Liz Truss resigned. Liz Truss resigned. So that's some news
00:52:17.400
that I heard this morning. So this morning, I learned that Liz Truss resigned. Also this morning,
00:52:23.340
I learned that Liz Truss was the head of the Great Britain's government. She was a prime minister.
00:52:31.320
I learned that this morning when I learned they should resign. I think I just admitted I'm American.
00:52:39.360
Do you remember when Benjamin Netanyahu was prime minister of Israel? And if somebody had asked me,
00:52:46.380
hey, Scott, do you know who the prime minister of Israel is? I would say, I do. Benjamin Netanyahu.
00:52:53.000
Now, who's the prime minister of Israel? I have no idea. No idea. Can anybody tell me who the prime minister
00:53:03.820
of Israel is? It's taking you a while, isn't it? Are you Googling it? Bennett?
00:53:14.260
Zelensky. Yeah. All right. Well, so I hate to admit how American I am, but wow, am I American?
00:53:29.980
Because I'll bet Europeans know the prime minister of Israel, right? Are there any Europeans watching
00:53:36.920
right now? Usually there are a few. Can you confirm to me that if you're a European, you do know the
00:53:43.540
prime minister of Israel's name? Let me see if that's true. Can anybody confirm that? There's always
00:53:49.020
somebody from Europe. Yeah, so I got one yes. All right. All right, here's another one.
00:53:58.920
Name by name, the prime minister of Italy. Go. And this is somebody who's been in the news.
00:54:12.280
Pretty good. Pretty good. Because Milani got a lot of press. Pretty good. Who's the prime minister
00:54:19.660
of Germany? Prime minister of Germany? Merkel? Somebody's answer was a woman. Is it a woman? All
00:54:33.860
right. How about this one's easy? France. France is easy, right? Macron. All right. Who else
00:54:45.760
we got? Belgium? I'm not even going to ask. Sweden? I don't know. Norway? I don't know.
00:54:55.840
I saw somebody on the locals platform was giving me a hard time. He was saying, I thought you
00:55:01.960
were engaged. You know, it's funny. I do follow the news. And my comment on the prime minister
00:55:10.500
of Israel is the following. I don't think the prime minister of Israel is doing as good a job as
00:55:16.040
Netanyahu did in managing public opinion. Because I believe almost all people who followed the news
00:55:22.720
knew who Benjamin Netanyahu was. And further, you probably knew his opinions, didn't you? He'd be on
00:55:30.240
the news all the time. The new prime minister is not getting it done in terms of managing American
00:55:36.180
public opinion. I don't even know the person's name. I mean, I'm pretty sure it's male. That's about
00:55:42.300
all I know. So I think Israel needs to, you know, maybe up their game in persuasion. Get it up to
00:55:49.140
Netanyahu levels. They'd be better off. Let's see. Anything else happen in here?
00:55:56.680
Maybe not. Maybe not. Did I miss any stories? Oh, yeah. So let me just put down a marker here for
00:56:12.420
something. I saw a doctor tweet. I'm going to get in trouble for this, but I'm going to do it anyway.
00:56:19.380
I skipped that story probably intentionally. I saw a doctor who tweeted today that he can't believe
00:56:30.460
that people still believe this is a doctor, right? So can you accept that this is not my opinion that
00:56:38.260
we'll be talking about? I'm talking about someone else's opinion, a doctor. A working doctor says he
00:56:44.400
can't believe it that people still think that masks don't work, that vaccinations don't work,
00:56:52.380
and that the vaccinations might be dangerous. And he says he can't believe that at this point we
00:56:59.500
still believe that. There's anybody who still believes that. Now, most of you believe all of
00:57:06.060
those things. I know my audience. Most of you believe the opposite of what that doctor believes.
00:57:12.080
And the obvious question is, how could it be that mainstream doctors probably in public would say
00:57:21.080
the same thing as that doctor, right? What they believe privately, that's a different question.
00:57:26.260
But in public, wouldn't you say almost all doctors, almost, there are plenty of exceptions,
00:57:31.840
but almost all doctors would agree with what that one doctor said? What do you think?
00:57:38.500
No. So, well, I think you might be in a little bubble if you don't think it's the vast majority.
00:57:44.180
My belief is the vast majority would say that in public, whatever they believed in private.
00:57:50.640
Now, how would you explain, and here's one of my tests for reality, okay? This is a good test for reality.
00:57:59.760
If you think one thing is true and the other thing is not true, ask yourself what else would have to be true
00:58:04.980
for you to maintain your belief, right? So, if you believe that that doctor was completely wrong,
00:58:13.500
what else would you have to believe about the world to maintain your belief that the guy who does this
00:58:19.320
for a living is wrong, but you're right? You would have to believe, number one, that he's either lying
00:58:27.280
or that he's deluded. You know, he's somehow been hypnotized or confused or something, in his own expertise.
00:58:36.900
Remember, he's a doctor, you're not. So, you would have to believe that the doctor
00:58:41.320
has been fooled in his own area of expertise, but you who are not a doctor have not been fooled
00:58:48.240
in his area of expertise. But you don't have to believe it about one doctor,
00:58:53.540
you have to believe it about millions of doctors, that millions of doctors have been
00:58:58.820
bamboozled in their area of expertise, but you who are not a doctor have not been bamboozled
00:59:06.240
by that. Or, or, or they've all been bought, and they're afraid. So, the most popular hypothesis
00:59:16.700
is that the doctors are all lying intentionally. They know they're lying, and they do it because
00:59:24.700
they don't want to lose their jobs, because pharma is so powerful. You know, it controls the hospitals
00:59:31.220
who hire the doctors, or the HMOs who hire the doctors. And most doctors actually work for a
00:59:36.160
paycheck. Most doctors have a boss. And no matter what the doctor believes, the boss is going to
00:59:42.440
kick their ass and fire them if they don't agree with the narrative. Now, in order to believe that,
00:59:50.380
you would have to believe something about people that I don't believe. So, this is where you and I
00:59:55.740
get off on a different path. For you to believe that that's true, that there's a massive pharma suppression
01:00:06.140
campaign that affects everybody everywhere. You would have to believe something about human beings
01:00:13.780
that I don't believe, which is that human beings are so similar that you could get all of them to
01:00:21.340
operate rationally for their own benefit. And I don't think you can get millions of people to act rationally
01:00:29.140
on anything. I believe that even doctors, there would be enough of them who would not care about
01:00:35.360
their personal safety, that you would hear plenty of them speaking up. Plenty of them. So this is where
01:00:41.500
we disagree. And by the way, this is how economists have conversations. I've said this before, that if I
01:00:49.000
never have a disagreement with an economist, because what we do is we start with, oh, what do you believe?
01:00:55.380
What do you believe? What assumption did you make? Okay, so far so good. Next assumption, okay, we're good.
01:01:01.980
Next assumption, oh, here's where it's different. Can we prove that your assumption is better than my
01:01:06.860
assumption on this one? And usually you can't, like at least within the debate, you'd have to go back and
01:01:12.920
do some work. But usually you don't end up disagreeing. A little technical problem there. I think we're back
01:01:22.280
online now. But usually if an economist is talking to another economist, you're not disagreeing on the
01:01:28.000
logic. You're usually disagreeing on an assumption about a fact. And often it's hard to know who's
01:01:33.860
right. So in this case, my belief is you could not get millions of people to all act rationally in the
01:01:42.940
same way. How many of you believe you could get millions of doctors to act rationally, rationally in
01:01:52.220
their own self-interest, and you couldn't get, oh, five or 10% of them to say, screw this. I'd rather be
01:01:59.960
famous for, you know, being the maverick or whatever. Yeah, standards of care. Yeah, the insurance
01:02:08.520
industry, the boss industry. So here's where we differ. You would say that that does explain
01:02:17.720
100% of, you know, the suppressed professional opinions. And I say that could never be more
01:02:23.640
than 90%. And anything less than 100% would be really obvious. And there would be enough
01:02:30.380
professional, credible doctors coming forward that you would say, all right, all right, there's
01:02:35.300
a problem there. You could be right. So I'm going to say that you could be right. I'm not
01:02:44.120
going to... I think there is precedent in the world of the medical community believing the
01:02:50.960
wrong thing at the same time. But not in the face of overwhelming evidence to the opposite.
01:02:58.860
Let me say that again in a better way. We do have precedent of doctors believing exactly
01:03:07.020
the wrong thing all at the same time. Would you all agree with that? That that's a historical
01:03:13.260
truth, that the medical professional can all be wrong at the same time, right? We all agree
01:03:18.680
on that. But look at those situations. Were those situations in which the current evidence
01:03:26.960
said the opposite of what the experts were saying? Ever? Because what I think is that the evidence
01:03:36.140
does not say the opposite of what the experts believe. I believe that the experts, if they
01:03:41.820
looked at the same stuff you're looking at, and you looked at the same stuff they're looking
01:03:45.880
at, and everybody looked at the same stuff, that you would not see what you believe to be
01:03:51.300
true, which is there's voluminous, obvious, credible data available to all of us that says the doctors
01:04:00.680
are wrong. You believe that's true, right? Let me say it again in a way that you can say yes
01:04:06.280
or no. So yes or no to this. There does exist, so yes, yes or no, there does exist lots of credible,
01:04:16.660
lots of credible data that says the doctor's narrative and their treatment for COVID is all wrong.
01:04:26.660
There's lots of it. It's credible, and there's lots of it, and it's available to everybody.
01:04:30.620
How many would say yes to that? Okay, I see you're all over the board. I'm saying no's, no's, no's.
01:04:40.620
Well, that's interesting. That's interesting. But that's the right question, isn't it?
01:04:48.060
So I don't, you know, we're not going to come to any decisions here. The only thing I'm trying to do
01:04:52.580
by this conversation is give you a little bit better framework of how some people who are
01:04:58.920
maybe more experienced with analysis, how they would break down the question. You always look
01:05:06.460
for what else would have to be true if what you believe is true. And where we differ is the thing
01:05:12.240
that you believe would have to be true. I think, I could see that being 90% true, but there's no way
01:05:18.320
you can get me to 100% that any group of professionals or any people, any group, any large group of a million
01:05:24.960
people. You can't get 90% on the same page on anything, on anything.
01:05:33.800
And have you noticed a pattern that most of the things, most of the studies that are opposite
01:05:43.120
of the narrative end up being debunked? Have you ever noticed that pattern? Most of the things
01:05:49.800
that disagree with the narrative get debunked, which is not to say that the narrative is
01:05:54.860
correct, right? That's not to say that. Those are unrelated points. The narrative can be either
01:06:01.480
correct or incorrect all by itself, but separately, these studies which say it's wrong could be
01:06:08.680
almost all entirely debunked. Or, you know, in theory, they could be 100% debunked and still
01:06:15.280
has nothing to do with the fact of what is actually true. All right. So I think that's
01:06:24.380
just a permanent situation. And the reason for that is because our news business does not
01:06:28.820
put competing opinions on the air. Our, the pandemic, so here's a, here's a spin on the pandemic
01:06:39.060
that I've not seen. The deaths from the pandemic are 100% caused by the news media.
01:06:51.340
Or, no, let's say that's 100% is never right. So let me, let me, let me try a better version
01:06:56.880
of that without 100% in there. In my opinion, our division in the country over the, over the
01:07:06.480
vaccinations, that division is caused entirely by the news model being broken. And specifically
01:07:13.720
because neither the right nor the left put on competing points of view. And until they
01:07:20.540
do that, we have a huge medical problem. So I'm going to go further. The biggest medical
01:07:27.200
problem in the country is fake news. Boom. I'm going to tweet that before you do. That's
01:07:34.560
so good. Somebody's going to tweet that. Watch this. I don't know if anybody will understand
01:07:41.760
the point out of context, but I'm going to tweet the biggest medical problem in the country
01:07:53.560
is fake news. All right. The biggest medical problem in the country is fake news. Let's see
01:08:01.920
if people understand that without the context. Thank you. It's an ambiguous statement. Yeah.
01:08:19.120
I don't mind the ambiguity on that tweet because people will fill in the context and the comments
01:08:23.720
and it will increase engagement. You know, I've told you before, one of the tricks of persuasion
01:08:29.420
is to make intentional mistakes because people pause when they see something that doesn't
01:08:34.980
belong. So when they see this tweet, some people are going to say, I'm not sure what that means.
01:08:40.620
I better read the comments to see if somebody explains it. And then I get people to stay to
01:08:45.660
read the comment. And now they're engaged. So if you get people to engage, you really become
01:08:52.300
sticky versus they read it. That's a good thing. And then they read on. They don't remember
01:08:57.020
anything. But if you could just make them pause for a moment to figure out what you were talking
01:09:00.700
about, then you can drill it into the head and keep it there. So there's your little persuasion
01:09:05.860
trick for the day. What is your opinion about JFK conspiracies? Oh, I thought you were going to
01:09:13.520
say JFK Jr. conspiracies about vaccinations. Has it been proven that vaccinating healthy teens
01:09:28.340
was not a good idea? Well, my understanding is that the CDC is going to add COVID vaccinations
01:09:36.740
to the recommended school vaccination. But that doesn't mean it's required because the
01:09:45.540
states still get to decide whether they can follow the recommendations. So it's still up
01:09:49.860
to the state, like it always was. And then secondly, many of the states, not all of them, allow
01:09:56.520
religious or other exemptions. So it doesn't mean that your kid has to get vaccinated. It does
01:10:01.900
mean that it's moving in that direction. All right. Okay. And yes, as other people have
01:10:18.940
noted correctly, that by getting on the CDC recommended list, that gives you automatic liability shield.
01:10:26.820
So if you're the pharma company, you push to be on that list, independent from whether that makes
01:10:32.980
anybody get the vaccination or not. Just being on the list gives you some kind of liability shield,
01:10:38.180
we're told. Yeah, follow the money. Does Scotty know what Building 7 is? Yes, you fucking cunt. Goodbye.
01:10:51.400
God, I fucking hate people who just come at me with an attitude.
01:10:54.960
Well, why do you assume I don't know something? Just come at me with the assumption that there's
01:11:02.220
something wrong with me. Just start with that assumption. Fucking piece of the shit. All right.
01:11:20.560
Why don't you make a website with all your YouTube videos? There is a website with all
01:11:34.000
of my YouTube videos. Do you have the URL? Let me give you the URL. So it's a website with
01:11:41.740
all of my YouTube videos. It's Y-O-U-T-U-B-E dot C-O-M. So you go to that website and then just search on
01:11:53.820
that website for me. You'll find a website with all of my YouTube videos. It'll be right there on
01:11:59.620
YouTube.com. So go check that out. Also, there's also my Dilbert blog page. If you go to
01:12:13.260
scottadamsays.com, you'll actually see the links to all the videos. So there are two places you can
01:12:18.760
get it. Can I get that URL again? That was pretty funny. Can you say that URL again? All right.
01:12:30.300
That's all for now. I'll talk to you. Talk to you tomorrow.