Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1903 Scott Adams： I'm Grumpy This Morning. This Will Not Go Well

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the grumpy version of Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:09.800 Normally, my cheery optimism is impossible to turn off, but today, I warn you, I'm grumpy,

00:00:16.860 and I don't know where the fuck this is going to go this morning, because I don't have any filters today. 0.60

00:00:23.400 Do you ever wake up and have no filter? I would fucking kill somebody today.

00:00:30.000 Like, today's the kind of day, no joke, I wish for a home invasion, because a fight to the death would be exactly what I'm up for right now.

00:00:41.000 Like, actually, you know, somebody comes into your home to do violence to you, and somehow you get the upper hand.

00:00:49.140 Today's the day I would finish them off. Like, if I got them on the ground, there's no way I'd let them leave the house alive.

00:00:56.060 So that's the kind of day I'm having.

00:01:01.420 So if you'd like to join me, all you need is a cupper mug or a glass, a tanker, chalicers, and a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:01:12.240 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:14.800 I like coffee, and I wish I had some in my cup, but my fucking coffee machine doesn't work this morning.

00:01:21.540 So I'm going to fake drink from a cup that doesn't have any fucking coffee in it.

00:01:27.300 Did I mention I'm grumpy this morning?

00:01:33.000 Go.

00:01:37.580 Yeah, if that had been coffee, that would have been amazing.

00:01:40.100 I'm sure all of you are enjoying your morning.

00:01:44.600 Yeah, I got two coffee makers, and they're both fucked up right now.

00:01:48.280 Let's talk about...

00:01:51.560 How did this happen?

00:02:01.320 Somehow I printed out yesterday's notes,

00:02:04.600 which is weird because they don't exist.

00:02:14.400 So I don't know how that happened.

00:02:16.600 I deleted all of my notes from yesterday

00:02:18.920 and then printed out the...

00:02:21.080 because I use the same documents, the same document.

00:02:23.420 How is it possible that I spent all morning writing in a blank document,

00:02:28.600 and then when I printed that document, it was yesterday's notes?

00:02:33.140 I'm not entirely sure, but while you're there,

00:02:40.000 I'm going to check and see if I put those in the wrong hole.

00:02:43.740 That is the weirdest thing.

00:02:45.980 So to say that everything's not working this morning would be an understatement.

00:02:52.540 Well, I'll be damned.

00:02:56.800 Oh, I see what I did.

00:02:58.020 Yep, I did the one thing.

00:03:02.340 I tell myself, whatever you do...

00:03:04.880 I've got two files that I use in the morning.

00:03:09.940 One of them, I have a rule, which is,

00:03:12.340 whatever you do, do not edit this file.

00:03:16.440 This file can never change,

00:03:18.080 because it's the one I need right before I go live.

00:03:19.900 It's the one that has the link for the YouTube.

00:03:23.580 So there's one that I can never, ever change,

00:03:25.840 and then there's one I change every day.

00:03:29.440 I did it the other way around this morning.

00:03:32.020 So it's like the one thing you're not supposed to do.

00:03:34.220 But I got my notes.

00:03:36.280 All right.

00:03:38.740 I'd be surprised if anybody's still watching this disaster of a live stream.

00:03:44.120 Rename the file.

00:03:47.680 No, that wouldn't help.

00:03:49.120 Did I mention I didn't have a coffee this morning?

00:03:51.240 Nothing would have helped me this morning.

00:03:55.620 David Sachs, as you know,

00:03:57.000 he's made his suggestion for how to settle the Ukraine situation

00:04:01.580 and got a lot of criticism.

00:04:04.420 And so based on that criticism,

00:04:06.400 David Sachs tweets today,

00:04:08.340 I'm willing to listen to experts,

00:04:10.440 just not the experts who got us into Iraq, Afghanistan,

00:04:13.520 Syria, and Libya.

00:04:16.460 You left out Ukraine.

00:04:18.460 The other people you shouldn't listen to

00:04:20.380 are the people who got you into Ukraine.

00:04:23.920 Yeah, those are the other people you shouldn't listen to.

00:04:26.960 Let me ask you something.

00:04:29.300 Is there anybody who watches this live stream

00:04:31.660 who still thinks that you should listen to the experts?

00:04:38.980 Like, does that even sound like a criticism that works in 2022?

00:04:43.520 If somebody tells you,

00:04:47.240 hey, why don't you listen to the experts?

00:04:50.380 You know what the best response to that is?

00:04:55.980 This is 2022.

00:04:58.900 Where have you been for the last two years?

00:05:01.760 Listening to the experts has caused every fucking problem we have.

00:05:05.980 All of them.

00:05:06.620 They're all the problems of the experts.

00:05:14.400 Laura Logan got kicked off on Newsmax, I guess. 0.62

00:05:20.740 Anybody follow that story?

00:05:22.280 So, Laura Logan went, I guess, full replacement theory, 1.00

00:05:29.840 and she believed...

00:05:33.280 This is the part that just blows my mind.

00:05:35.820 So, she said on Newsmax,

00:05:37.360 and by the way,

00:05:38.300 I'm just reporting what she said

00:05:39.980 before she was kicked off on Newsmax.

00:05:42.000 So, I'm not telling you my opinion on these topics.

00:05:45.080 But apparently she said

00:05:47.560 that she talked to somebody

00:05:48.700 who had infiltrated, I don't know,

00:05:50.940 the UN or something,

00:05:52.620 and he held in his hand a document

00:05:54.700 that proved that there was a big plan

00:05:57.620 to replace the democracies

00:06:01.340 by bringing in lots of immigrants

00:06:03.680 and then they would help change the world in some way.

00:06:08.140 And that's, I guess,

00:06:10.260 it's racist and blood libel

00:06:11.860 and there's all kinds of stuff

00:06:13.040 wrapped into that stuff.

00:06:15.040 But here's the part.

00:06:17.340 What she said was

00:06:18.460 she talked to a guy

00:06:19.460 who claimed he held in his hand

00:06:21.040 the document that proved

00:06:22.220 what he said was true.

00:06:24.300 Isn't there something missing in that story?

00:06:27.060 All right, all right.

00:06:28.200 So, you talked to a guy

00:06:29.120 who held in his hand,

00:06:30.720 it was right in his hand,

00:06:31.660 the proof he needed it.

00:06:32.660 Right there, there's the guy,

00:06:34.500 there's his hand.

00:06:36.000 Was there any point, Laura,

00:06:38.080 where you said,

00:06:38.940 could you maybe hand that thing

00:06:42.060 in your hand over to one of my hands

00:06:44.940 and then I would have that in my hand

00:06:47.360 and then I would open it

00:06:48.640 and then look at it with my eyes

00:06:50.600 and then I would see

00:06:52.200 if that looked real or not.

00:06:54.440 But no, her story is

00:06:56.120 that she talked to a guy

00:06:57.200 who says he had it in his hand.

00:06:59.380 And if that's not proof,

00:07:01.200 I don't know what is.

00:07:02.660 So, I don't care what else she said

00:07:04.980 that got her bumped off of Newsmax,

00:07:07.320 I think I would have fired her 1.00

00:07:09.080 just for saying that a guy

00:07:10.260 had proof in his hands.

00:07:13.520 He's got proof in his hands.

00:07:14.960 Well, that's good.

00:07:16.740 That's good.

00:07:19.660 Do you know that

00:07:20.760 there's now proof that UFOs are real?

00:07:25.560 Yeah, there's proof.

00:07:27.020 A lot of people are speculating

00:07:28.180 that UFOs are not real,

00:07:29.500 but I've got the proof in my hand.

00:07:33.660 It's right here.

00:07:36.120 Right here.

00:07:37.240 Oh, you'd like to see it?

00:07:39.720 Sorry.

00:07:40.880 It doesn't work that way.

00:07:42.700 Proof's in my hand.

00:07:44.160 Right there.

00:07:44.760 So, I feel like there's something

00:07:48.560 left at the end of that story.

00:07:53.080 I am quite amused

00:07:54.520 as I watch the Democrats

00:07:56.280 try to explain

00:07:57.320 why things are really going well

00:07:59.060 or why Biden should remain

00:08:02.200 president for longer than four years.

00:08:04.960 and the best job

00:08:07.580 of this I've seen

00:08:08.700 was actually hilarious

00:08:10.280 because, you know,

00:08:12.140 the argument for the Democrat side

00:08:13.960 is kind of disappearing.

00:08:16.480 So, this is what Chris Hayes said

00:08:19.160 as the reason...

00:08:23.660 So, he's explaining

00:08:25.580 why it made sense

00:08:26.780 for Biden to release the gas...

00:08:29.920 Not the gas.

00:08:31.280 To release the oil

00:08:32.180 from the National Reserve.

00:08:34.960 And he explains

00:08:36.640 that the reason

00:08:37.480 why that's okay

00:08:38.460 and that even though

00:08:40.600 it's purely political

00:08:41.660 is purely political

00:08:44.140 in a good way

00:08:45.040 because it prevents fascists

00:08:47.040 from taking over.

00:08:49.780 So, using up

00:08:51.080 our emergency reserve

00:08:52.620 at the same time

00:08:54.940 we're giving up

00:08:55.560 our weapons.

00:08:56.800 I guess we're

00:08:57.520 giving away our weapons.

00:08:59.820 And we're giving away

00:09:00.500 our National Reserve.

00:09:01.940 But that's okay

00:09:02.860 because if this

00:09:04.580 lowers gas prices

00:09:05.860 and it allows

00:09:06.420 Biden to win...

00:09:08.580 Well, I'll just read you

00:09:09.440 Chris Hayes' argument.

00:09:10.420 He goes, quote,

00:09:11.040 We find ourselves

00:09:12.040 in a situation

00:09:12.660 where keeping gas prices low

00:09:14.600 is key to preserving

00:09:16.440 and strengthening

00:09:17.140 the future of our democracy.

00:09:19.460 And so, here we are.

00:09:21.380 Hence, Biden releasing oil

00:09:23.040 from the reserves today.

00:09:25.340 So that...

00:09:25.900 Releasing our oil

00:09:27.780 so that Biden gets re-elected

00:09:30.560 is justified 0.95

00:09:33.740 because the main thing

00:09:35.300 is that Biden

00:09:35.880 gets re-elected

00:09:36.900 and we keep these...

00:09:38.240 We keep these risks

00:09:40.900 to our democracy

00:09:42.060 and to the White House.

00:09:45.060 I've got to say,

00:09:46.920 one of the things

00:09:47.580 I always say about lawyers

00:09:48.720 is you always have to listen

00:09:51.000 for the other side's argument

00:09:52.380 because lawyers are really good

00:09:54.060 at making an argument

00:09:55.560 out of nothing.

00:09:56.240 And this is pretty good.

00:10:00.140 It's pretty...

00:10:00.540 I mean, it's completely

00:10:01.500 unpersuasive, of course.

00:10:03.360 But he had nothing

00:10:04.800 to work with.

00:10:06.460 Imagine being

00:10:07.360 on the Democrat side

00:10:08.500 and you're a pundit.

00:10:09.700 He had nothing to work with.

00:10:11.360 But he still...

00:10:12.100 He still built

00:10:13.140 a little structure

00:10:13.940 that makes sense

00:10:14.780 in its own way.

00:10:16.500 Yes, it does make sense

00:10:17.840 that the only way

00:10:19.480 to preserve democracy

00:10:20.680 is releasing that oil.

00:10:22.420 And it actually tracks.

00:10:25.040 Like, one does connect

00:10:26.220 to the other point.

00:10:28.720 It's kind of...

00:10:30.800 I was impressed.

00:10:33.760 It's not a good point,

00:10:35.980 but given what he had

00:10:36.980 to work with,

00:10:38.260 it was quite an effort.

00:10:40.180 I don't know.

00:10:41.520 I have to applaud that.

00:10:44.400 The Blaze has...

00:10:46.120 They're setting new records here.

00:10:48.460 They got two fake newses

00:10:51.480 in one tweet.

00:10:53.460 All right?

00:10:54.200 So here's what they say.

00:10:56.040 They say,

00:10:56.720 Bill Gates says

00:10:57.760 a Russian invasion of Ukraine

00:10:59.360 will be, quote,

00:11:00.620 good for the long run

00:11:01.840 because it will force countries

00:11:03.580 to transition to green energy.

00:11:05.720 Praises ESG investment.

00:11:09.060 Both of those are fake news.

00:11:11.360 Fake news.

00:11:12.520 Here's why.

00:11:14.660 Bill Gates...

00:11:15.580 Let's do the first part.

00:11:16.640 Bill Gates says

00:11:17.240 the Russian invasion of Ukraine

00:11:18.300 will be, quote,

00:11:19.460 good for the long run.

00:11:21.300 Take it out of context.

00:11:24.700 I say exactly the same thing.

00:11:28.860 Has anybody criticized me

00:11:30.240 for saying it?

00:11:32.380 How often do I say

00:11:33.760 nobody wants a war,

00:11:35.560 but it's nonetheless true

00:11:37.340 that wars spur innovation?

00:11:40.100 Does that sound like

00:11:41.180 I love me some war?

00:11:43.980 Mmm, love war

00:11:45.200 because of all the good points,

00:11:47.220 the innovation that comes out of it.

00:11:49.280 So does it look like

00:11:50.260 I'm in favor of war 1.00

00:11:51.380 because the innovations

00:11:54.440 are worth having?

00:11:56.400 No.

00:11:58.680 So when Bill Gates says

00:12:00.340 that the Russian invasion

00:12:04.100 of Ukraine

00:12:04.680 will be good for the long run,

00:12:06.880 what he's specifically

00:12:07.900 talking about

00:12:08.720 is energy sources

00:12:10.340 that don't bind us

00:12:11.720 to other countries

00:12:13.280 and they're good

00:12:14.660 for the environment

00:12:15.340 and everything else.

00:12:16.920 Now remember,

00:12:18.220 Bill Gates is heavily invested

00:12:19.580 in nuclear energy.

00:12:21.800 So when Bill Gates says

00:12:22.960 it's good for the long run,

00:12:25.040 he is including

00:12:25.960 it's good for the

00:12:27.380 nuclear energy business,

00:12:29.220 which most of you

00:12:30.100 would agree is a good thing.

00:12:32.060 Now, do you think

00:12:33.180 it's a bad thing

00:12:34.000 that Germany is turning

00:12:34.940 its nuclear power plants

00:12:36.340 back on?

00:12:39.000 Don't we all think

00:12:39.900 that's a good thing?

00:12:40.580 So here's the blaze

00:12:42.520 acting like he's

00:12:43.420 some kind of fucking vampire

00:12:44.700 who's happy about

00:12:46.820 the Ukraine war

00:12:49.280 because it's good

00:12:50.040 for his green investments.

00:12:51.740 Nothing the fuck

00:12:52.780 like that happened.

00:12:54.460 This was Bill Gates

00:12:55.360 saying exactly what I say

00:12:56.940 all the time,

00:12:57.960 which is nobody wants

00:12:59.180 this bad thing to happen,

00:13:00.780 but it is nonetheless

00:13:01.900 the case

00:13:03.840 that bad things

00:13:05.360 cause you to innovate

00:13:06.640 and sometimes

00:13:07.400 the innovations are good.

00:13:08.380 Where is the problem

00:13:11.220 with that, really?

00:13:13.400 Does anybody have a problem

00:13:14.740 with the fact that

00:13:15.880 wars spur innovation?

00:13:18.460 It's just a statement of fact.

00:13:21.740 How about the second part?

00:13:22.760 He praises ESG investments.

00:13:25.400 Completely false.

00:13:27.100 He's on record for saying

00:13:28.400 that the reporting requirements

00:13:29.940 of ESG are crazy

00:13:31.380 because we don't have

00:13:33.960 a second way

00:13:34.540 to make steel.

00:13:36.180 Steel is just going to be

00:13:37.740 energy intensive

00:13:40.200 and bad for the environment

00:13:42.000 or you don't make steel.

00:13:43.540 Nobody has another way

00:13:44.440 to do it.

00:13:45.920 So when Bill Gates

00:13:47.600 praises ESG investment,

00:13:50.540 he's not saying

00:13:52.200 the reporting part,

00:13:53.320 which is really the ESG.

00:13:54.620 He's saying the concept.

00:13:56.500 The concept of ESG

00:13:58.040 is fine.

00:13:59.200 Who's against

00:13:59.860 a healthier environment?

00:14:02.160 The concept is fine.

00:14:04.540 And again,

00:14:05.360 he's for nuclear energy

00:14:06.920 and nuclear energy

00:14:08.260 would be great

00:14:08.840 for the environment.

00:14:11.100 So this is just

00:14:13.340 two fake newses

00:14:14.140 from the blaze.

00:14:16.240 I hate that I have

00:14:17.480 to be in a position of

00:14:18.460 it looks like I'm

00:14:19.180 defending Bill Gates,

00:14:20.500 but I'm not

00:14:21.480 because he can

00:14:22.220 defend himself.

00:14:23.900 I'm simply saying

00:14:25.160 that the news is fake.

00:14:26.360 That's not defending him.

00:14:27.500 Do you know

00:14:35.680 Seth Abramson?

00:14:37.780 So he's a notable

00:14:39.580 Democrat activist,

00:14:42.420 operative,

00:14:43.840 bundet,

00:14:44.500 I don't know.

00:14:45.660 He's an active voice

00:14:47.020 in the Democrat Party.

00:14:48.800 And he says

00:14:49.880 that the news media,

00:14:51.320 at least the TV news media,

00:14:52.760 has gone right wing.

00:14:55.080 Is that what you see?

00:14:58.120 Do you see the media

00:14:58.840 has gone right wing?

00:15:03.260 And here's his argument.

00:15:06.000 Isn't it amazing

00:15:06.740 that you live

00:15:07.340 in the same world

00:15:08.260 with Seth Abramson

00:15:11.940 and that his view

00:15:13.980 of what is happening

00:15:14.920 in the real world

00:15:15.780 is just completely opposite

00:15:17.340 of what I think

00:15:19.060 most of you

00:15:19.640 or all of you see?

00:15:20.480 So his argument

00:15:21.960 that the TV news

00:15:23.660 is drifting right

00:15:24.660 is that Newsmax

00:15:27.780 and what is it,

00:15:29.940 One Network,

00:15:31.160 whatever it is,

00:15:31.980 so there have been

00:15:32.520 some new media

00:15:33.440 that have come

00:15:35.000 into being

00:15:35.720 that lean right.

00:15:38.400 So OAN,

00:15:39.220 yes, OAN.

00:15:40.100 So he's using

00:15:40.860 Newsmax and OAN

00:15:41.980 CNN as being

00:15:42.900 more recent networks

00:15:44.620 as evidence

00:15:45.380 of the move

00:15:46.620 to the right.

00:15:47.400 And then he also

00:15:48.340 lists CNN.

00:15:50.080 He goes,

00:15:50.460 CNN's moving

00:15:51.200 to the right.

00:15:52.960 Is CNN moving

00:15:53.820 to the right?

00:15:57.380 Apparently the middle

00:15:58.400 is the right now.

00:16:00.480 Has anybody seen CNN

00:16:01.960 do anything

00:16:02.760 that looked like

00:16:03.420 a move to the right?

00:16:04.800 I mean,

00:16:05.140 it's right from

00:16:06.000 where they were

00:16:06.680 for sure.

00:16:08.320 But I think

00:16:09.640 that they were targeted

00:16:10.540 directly at the middle

00:16:11.640 and they're pretty

00:16:13.940 close to the middle,

00:16:14.880 actually.

00:16:16.760 If you've watched

00:16:17.640 CNN lately,

00:16:19.700 they're much closer

00:16:20.560 to the middle,

00:16:21.080 wouldn't you say?

00:16:22.240 I don't know if they're,

00:16:23.000 you know,

00:16:23.320 you could quibble

00:16:25.300 about specifics,

00:16:26.660 but I'd say

00:16:27.760 they're closer

00:16:28.220 to the middle.

00:16:30.600 So,

00:16:31.920 and I think

00:16:32.780 they're a little bit

00:16:33.520 more watchable, too.

00:16:35.680 So I think

00:16:36.300 it's working.

00:16:37.860 You know,

00:16:38.100 I don't know

00:16:38.440 if it's,

00:16:39.180 it works for me,

00:16:39.980 I don't know

00:16:40.200 if it works

00:16:40.580 for their numbers.

00:16:42.440 But it's kind

00:16:43.160 of amazing

00:16:43.600 to live in a world

00:16:44.800 and know that

00:16:45.260 there's somebody

00:16:45.760 who would say

00:16:46.280 that perspective

00:16:47.920 in public

00:16:51.340 like we can all

00:16:53.440 see it.

00:16:54.720 Isn't that weird?

00:16:56.620 When you say

00:16:57.300 something like this

00:16:58.020 in public,

00:16:58.720 what you're saying

00:16:59.400 is,

00:16:59.720 well,

00:16:59.800 you can all

00:17:00.280 see this,

00:17:00.820 too.

00:17:01.360 I'm just,

00:17:01.960 you know,

00:17:02.240 describing what you see.

00:17:04.000 I'll say that.

00:17:05.760 All right.

00:17:06.120 The best

00:17:08.600 Halloween costume

00:17:09.760 I've seen,

00:17:11.140 just so I go by

00:17:12.180 on Twitter,

00:17:13.640 I'll describe it

00:17:14.800 so that you can

00:17:15.700 do it, too.

00:17:16.580 So I think

00:17:17.400 you can buy

00:17:18.020 Joe Biden

00:17:19.460 masks.

00:17:20.280 You can usually

00:17:20.840 buy a mask

00:17:22.040 of the president,

00:17:22.740 right?

00:17:23.240 So you get a

00:17:23.940 Joe Biden mask

00:17:24.780 and then you get

00:17:25.940 a little fake

00:17:27.520 skull or something

00:17:28.380 and you put the

00:17:29.000 mask on whatever

00:17:29.900 it is that's

00:17:30.420 like a head.

00:17:30.940 and then you

00:17:32.240 have your

00:17:34.720 young daughter

00:17:35.500 stick it in

00:17:37.820 the side of

00:17:38.740 her shirt

00:17:40.500 so it looks

00:17:42.040 like Joe Biden

00:17:42.760 is sniffing

00:17:43.320 her hair.

00:17:46.400 That's the

00:17:47.080 whole costume.

00:17:48.320 It's pretty

00:17:48.740 good.

00:17:54.080 All right.

00:17:55.340 So how many

00:17:56.260 of you are

00:17:56.740 watching on

00:17:58.100 right-leaning

00:17:59.060 media?

00:17:59.500 Dr.

00:18:00.060 Rasim

00:18:00.720 Malhotra

00:18:02.040 who is a

00:18:03.960 cardiologist

00:18:05.680 and

00:18:06.840 consultant

00:18:08.620 cardiologist

00:18:10.160 I think

00:18:10.500 and

00:18:11.840 he believes

00:18:13.220 he's looked

00:18:13.740 at the data

00:18:14.380 the Pfizer

00:18:16.080 data in

00:18:16.580 particular

00:18:16.940 and thinks

00:18:18.160 that there's

00:18:18.720 enough

00:18:19.080 bad

00:18:20.200 indications

00:18:21.420 in the

00:18:22.120 known data

00:18:22.920 you know

00:18:23.540 in the

00:18:24.260 known data

00:18:25.160 that

00:18:26.220 the

00:18:26.960 vaccination

00:18:27.940 should be

00:18:28.480 pulled.

00:18:30.060 now

00:18:30.780 I watch

00:18:34.020 this

00:18:34.320 and I

00:18:34.600 say to

00:18:34.860 myself

00:18:35.240 wow

00:18:35.680 he's

00:18:36.620 looking

00:18:36.920 at

00:18:37.100 information

00:18:37.580 that is

00:18:38.060 available

00:18:38.420 to the

00:18:39.420 public

00:18:39.800 my

00:18:41.400 understanding

00:18:41.940 is right

00:18:42.360 so he's

00:18:43.340 looking at

00:18:43.660 information

00:18:44.080 we can

00:18:44.440 all look

00:18:44.800 at so

00:18:45.220 all

00:18:45.520 cardiologists

00:18:46.280 can look

00:18:46.680 at the

00:18:46.960 same

00:18:47.140 stuff

00:18:47.580 look

00:18:51.980 Holling

00:18:52.700 I'm

00:18:52.900 just

00:18:53.060 going

00:18:53.200 to

00:18:53.360 fuck

00:18:54.240 off

00:18:54.560 just

00:18:54.980 fuck

00:18:55.260 off

00:18:55.540 you're

00:18:56.200 already

00:18:56.440 starting

00:18:56.900 like

00:18:57.740 what is

00:18:58.400 your

00:18:58.540 point

00:18:58.940 are you

00:18:59.640 just

00:18:59.800 trying

00:19:00.000 to be

00:19:00.280 an

00:19:00.420 asshole

00:19:00.760 let me

00:19:02.700 even

00:19:02.900 remove

00:19:03.540 put user

00:19:04.520 in time

00:19:04.900 out

00:19:05.100 let me

00:19:06.560 even

00:19:06.740 finish

00:19:07.080 the

00:19:07.280 fucking

00:19:07.580 point

00:19:08.020 okay

00:19:08.580 I warned

00:19:11.620 you I'm

00:19:11.840 grumpy

00:19:12.120 today

00:19:12.420 so don't

00:19:12.840 get on

00:19:13.140 me

00:19:13.800 so here's

00:19:16.020 my

00:19:16.180 question

00:19:16.560 it's

00:19:18.260 a

00:19:18.580 doctor

00:19:20.740 with

00:19:21.020 credentials

00:19:21.580 who's

00:19:22.960 pointing

00:19:23.260 to

00:19:23.620 public

00:19:24.180 information

00:19:24.840 and he's

00:19:26.680 looking right

00:19:27.180 at it

00:19:27.640 and saying

00:19:28.260 look at

00:19:28.780 this

00:19:28.980 public

00:19:29.320 information

00:19:29.940 hey

00:19:30.860 everybody

00:19:31.240 look at

00:19:31.660 this

00:19:31.980 this would

00:19:33.240 tell you

00:19:33.740 that

00:19:34.060 the medical

00:19:35.500 advice

00:19:36.020 you're

00:19:36.260 getting

00:19:36.500 is all

00:19:36.900 wrong

00:19:37.220 where are

00:19:39.320 the other

00:19:40.280 people

00:19:40.700 who say

00:19:42.440 yeah I

00:19:42.860 looked at

00:19:43.280 exactly what

00:19:43.940 he looked

00:19:44.320 at

00:19:44.560 yeah he's

00:19:45.140 right

00:19:45.400 where are

00:19:46.620 those

00:19:46.820 people

00:19:47.100 is it

00:19:49.140 really

00:19:49.540 true

00:19:50.000 that

00:19:51.600 we can't

00:19:52.700 get more

00:19:53.160 of these

00:19:53.540 people

00:19:53.900 is he

00:19:55.460 the

00:19:55.740 like the

00:19:56.700 one

00:19:57.600 brave

00:19:57.980 one

00:19:58.240 because

00:20:01.040 he's

00:20:01.320 pointing to

00:20:02.140 something

00:20:02.420 very

00:20:02.720 specific

00:20:03.260 he's not

00:20:03.840 saying

00:20:04.160 look at

00:20:04.620 everything

00:20:05.080 right

00:20:06.120 he's

00:20:06.800 looking at

00:20:07.260 either a

00:20:08.140 study or

00:20:08.720 specific

00:20:09.240 information

00:20:10.260 can't we

00:20:11.440 all look

00:20:11.800 at that

00:20:12.180 now if

00:20:12.660 I looked

00:20:13.020 at it

00:20:13.340 it wouldn't

00:20:13.680 help

00:20:14.020 because I'm

00:20:15.040 not an

00:20:15.380 expert

00:20:15.680 not a

00:20:16.180 doctor

00:20:16.440 but can't

00:20:17.420 the other

00:20:17.720 doctors look

00:20:18.420 at exactly

00:20:19.300 what he's

00:20:19.840 looking at

00:20:20.400 and at

00:20:21.180 least tell

00:20:21.720 you yes

00:20:23.100 he's

00:20:23.400 interpreting

00:20:23.840 this

00:20:24.140 correctly

00:20:24.600 or no

00:20:27.020 he's

00:20:27.660 incorrectly

00:20:28.560 interpreting

00:20:29.260 it

00:20:29.600 they don't

00:20:31.100 even need

00:20:31.540 to have

00:20:32.940 an opinion

00:20:33.320 do they

00:20:33.720 I feel

00:20:35.280 as if

00:20:35.720 here's

00:20:37.000 what

00:20:37.240 is missing

00:20:37.900 so as

00:20:41.300 useful

00:20:41.700 as it

00:20:42.200 is to

00:20:42.740 see

00:20:43.300 rogue

00:20:44.800 opinions

00:20:45.340 or ones

00:20:45.820 that

00:20:46.040 disagree

00:20:46.520 with the

00:20:46.840 mainstream

00:20:47.160 it

00:20:48.160 doesn't

00:20:48.740 help me

00:20:49.380 unless

00:20:50.000 it's

00:20:50.520 paired

00:20:50.780 with a

00:20:51.160 counter

00:20:51.460 argument

00:20:52.140 you tell

00:20:54.980 me you

00:20:55.300 can't get

00:20:55.740 anybody

00:20:56.140 from

00:20:56.500 Pfizer

00:20:56.920 to be

00:20:58.380 on a

00:20:58.660 show

00:20:58.840 with that

00:20:59.200 guy

00:20:59.500 at all

00:21:01.300 there's

00:21:01.880 nobody

00:21:02.120 from

00:21:02.400 Pfizer

00:21:02.780 there's

00:21:03.700 no

00:21:04.080 top

00:21:04.560 doctor

00:21:05.040 who's

00:21:05.700 also

00:21:06.000 looked at

00:21:06.400 the same

00:21:06.740 information

00:21:07.260 and is

00:21:08.080 on the

00:21:08.320 other

00:21:08.460 side

00:21:08.860 you can't

00:21:09.800 get him

00:21:10.040 on to

00:21:10.600 say

00:21:10.900 no that

00:21:11.380 guy

00:21:11.560 looked at

00:21:11.960 the wrong

00:21:12.320 thing

00:21:12.740 or he

00:21:13.620 interpreted

00:21:14.060 it wrong

00:21:14.540 we are

00:21:18.780 being so

00:21:19.340 fucked over

00:21:20.140 by the

00:21:20.880 news

00:21:21.240 both left

00:21:22.560 and right

00:21:23.020 so I'm

00:21:23.920 going to

00:21:24.100 include

00:21:24.400 Fox News

00:21:25.060 in the

00:21:25.380 bad

00:21:25.600 category

00:21:26.020 here

00:21:26.380 so I

00:21:28.800 watched

00:21:29.040 Laura

00:21:29.420 Ingram's

00:21:29.900 show

00:21:30.140 and she

00:21:30.420 had

00:21:30.640 this

00:21:31.240 doctor

00:21:31.600 on

00:21:31.940 but

00:21:33.140 if she

00:21:33.720 doesn't

00:21:34.080 ever

00:21:34.340 have a

00:21:34.700 doctor

00:21:34.980 on

00:21:35.240 who

00:21:35.400 disagrees

00:21:36.100 with

00:21:36.360 this

00:21:36.540 doctor

00:21:36.880 has

00:21:37.140 she

00:21:37.260 done

00:21:37.460 a

00:21:37.580 good

00:21:37.720 service

00:21:38.180 let me

00:21:40.660 ask

00:21:40.840 that

00:21:41.080 I hate

00:21:43.080 to make

00:21:43.320 this

00:21:43.500 personal

00:21:43.900 because I

00:21:44.460 like

00:21:45.120 Laura

00:21:45.360 Ingram

00:21:45.680 but

00:21:46.700 is that

00:21:48.860 a good

00:21:49.180 service

00:21:49.580 to us

00:21:50.040 to put

00:21:50.360 one

00:21:50.600 doctor

00:21:50.940 on

00:21:51.240 when

00:21:52.300 most

00:21:52.720 of the

00:21:53.040 medical

00:21:53.320 community

00:21:53.860 is on

00:21:55.400 the other

00:21:55.700 side

00:21:56.060 we think

00:21:57.620 we haven't

00:21:58.280 heard from

00:21:58.700 them so

00:21:59.060 maybe not

00:21:59.740 I don't

00:22:01.460 know

00:22:01.660 I don't

00:22:02.700 feel like

00:22:03.080 that moved

00:22:03.520 the ball

00:22:03.880 forward

00:22:04.320 I think

00:22:04.700 it was

00:22:07.260 provocative

00:22:07.840 and maybe

00:22:09.480 there's

00:22:10.940 value

00:22:11.300 for the

00:22:11.700 first

00:22:11.940 red

00:22:12.200 flag

00:22:12.580 right

00:22:12.900 there's

00:22:14.240 value

00:22:14.580 to

00:22:14.900 raise

00:22:15.460 alarms

00:22:15.880 when

00:22:16.220 somebody

00:22:16.620 qualified

00:22:17.680 as

00:22:17.900 raising

00:22:18.200 alarm

00:22:18.580 but

00:22:19.500 if

00:22:19.780 it

00:22:19.900 just

00:22:20.100 ends

00:22:20.520 there

00:22:20.880 what

00:22:22.080 service

00:22:22.660 has

00:22:22.860 been

00:22:23.020 done

00:22:23.240 to

00:22:23.420 the

00:22:23.600 viewing

00:22:24.440 public

00:22:24.960 I

00:22:26.220 think

00:22:26.440 Laura

00:22:26.760 Ingram

00:22:27.120 absolutely

00:22:27.860 needs

00:22:28.340 to get

00:22:28.680 somebody

00:22:29.200 on there

00:22:29.700 to say

00:22:30.080 that guy

00:22:30.540 is wrong

00:22:31.040 and why

00:22:31.940 now it'd

00:22:33.420 be nice

00:22:33.740 to have

00:22:33.960 them on

00:22:34.260 at the

00:22:34.520 same

00:22:34.720 time

00:22:35.140 but

00:22:36.160 if

00:22:36.360 you

00:22:36.500 can't

00:22:36.780 get

00:22:36.920 somebody

00:22:37.240 on there

00:22:37.620 to give

00:22:38.020 the

00:22:38.180 counter

00:22:38.480 argument

00:22:38.960 should

00:22:41.900 you

00:22:42.060 trust

00:22:42.340 it

00:22:42.580 should

00:22:44.540 you

00:22:44.720 trust

00:22:45.080 anything

00:22:45.500 he

00:22:45.760 says

00:22:46.160 until

00:22:46.560 you've

00:22:46.920 seen

00:22:47.160 the

00:22:47.400 counter

00:22:47.720 argument

00:22:48.200 there

00:22:48.740 might

00:22:48.920 not

00:22:49.120 be

00:22:49.320 one

00:22:49.600 it

00:22:50.240 could

00:22:50.440 be

00:22:50.600 that

00:22:50.780 the

00:22:50.900 reason

00:22:51.120 you

00:22:51.260 don't

00:22:51.400 see

00:22:51.580 a

00:22:51.720 counter

00:22:51.960 argument

00:22:52.280 is

00:22:52.520 nobody

00:22:52.820 has

00:22:53.100 one

00:22:53.280 that

00:22:54.140 that's

00:22:54.240 entirely

00:22:54.600 possible

00:22:55.100 but

00:22:56.520 somebody

00:22:57.180 needs

00:22:57.420 to

00:22:57.580 tell

00:22:57.780 us

00:22:57.960 that

00:22:58.240 tell

00:22:59.760 us

00:23:00.080 tell

00:23:00.840 us

00:23:01.080 is

00:23:01.300 there

00:23:01.420 no

00:23:01.580 argument

00:23:01.920 there's

00:23:02.400 nobody

00:23:02.620 on the

00:23:02.880 other

00:23:03.040 side

00:23:03.340 because

00:23:04.260 it's

00:23:04.440 possible

00:23:04.780 there

00:23:04.960 isn't

00:23:06.180 maybe

00:23:06.620 anyway

00:23:09.120 you

00:23:09.580 are so

00:23:09.920 underserved

00:23:10.500 by your

00:23:10.860 news

00:23:11.180 and I

00:23:15.140 don't

00:23:15.260 have an

00:23:15.520 opinion

00:23:15.760 of whether

00:23:16.260 let me

00:23:16.880 give you

00:23:17.160 my

00:23:17.460 most

00:23:18.260 updated

00:23:18.840 we

00:23:21.220 don't

00:23:21.460 call them

00:23:21.800 vaccinations

00:23:22.380 anymore

00:23:22.820 right

00:23:23.020 my

00:23:23.260 updated

00:23:23.660 shot

00:23:24.100 opinion

00:23:24.500 what is

00:23:26.360 more

00:23:26.560 dangerous

00:23:27.100 the

00:23:27.500 vaccination

00:23:28.060 or

00:23:28.980 the

00:23:30.460 mRNA

00:23:31.360 shot

00:23:32.800 here's

00:23:33.940 my

00:23:34.120 current

00:23:34.420 opinion

00:23:34.800 you ready

00:23:35.240 don't

00:23:37.620 know

00:23:37.880 don't

00:23:39.260 know

00:23:39.480 I

00:23:41.220 can't

00:23:41.500 tell

00:23:41.760 let's

00:23:45.140 see

00:23:45.280 if

00:23:45.460 now

00:23:46.100 many

00:23:46.860 of you

00:23:47.120 think

00:23:47.440 that you

00:23:47.720 have a

00:23:47.960 pretty

00:23:48.160 strong

00:23:48.600 opinion

00:23:48.960 one

00:23:49.240 way

00:23:49.460 or

00:23:49.560 the

00:23:49.660 other

00:23:49.880 do

00:23:51.420 you

00:23:51.580 think

00:23:51.900 let me

00:23:52.380 ask

00:23:52.600 it this

00:23:52.900 way

00:23:53.120 do

00:23:53.840 you

00:23:53.920 think

00:23:54.120 anybody

00:23:54.520 should

00:23:54.820 have

00:23:54.940 a

00:23:55.080 strong

00:23:55.400 opinion

00:23:55.820 given

00:23:57.380 the

00:23:58.920 information

00:23:59.440 that's

00:23:59.740 available

00:24:00.160 should

00:24:01.200 you have

00:24:01.400 a

00:24:01.540 strong

00:24:01.860 opinion

00:24:02.240 well let

00:24:04.520 me put

00:24:04.800 it a

00:24:04.980 different way

00:24:05.200 a strong

00:24:05.620 opinion

00:24:05.920 about whether

00:24:06.500 it works

00:24:07.120 you could

00:24:08.240 have a

00:24:08.540 strong

00:24:08.780 opinion

00:24:09.120 about whether

00:24:09.580 you should

00:24:09.920 take it

00:24:10.440 that's

00:24:11.280 different

00:24:11.580 I'm not

00:24:12.640 saying

00:24:12.880 whether

00:24:13.080 you should

00:24:13.420 take it

00:24:14.100 that

00:24:14.480 that decision

00:24:15.260 can be

00:24:15.720 easier

00:24:16.120 but do

00:24:17.040 you have

00:24:17.160 a strong

00:24:17.580 opinion

00:24:17.880 about

00:24:18.180 whether

00:24:18.600 the claims

00:24:21.440 are relatively

00:24:22.660 accurate

00:24:23.320 that it

00:24:24.120 protects

00:24:25.040 you

00:24:25.340 you know

00:24:31.400 what's weird

00:24:31.840 is

00:24:32.120 I don't

00:24:32.720 even see

00:24:33.180 something

00:24:33.540 developing

00:24:34.280 in the

00:24:35.660 world

00:24:36.060 that would

00:24:36.800 help us

00:24:37.380 why

00:24:39.140 usually

00:24:39.760 you see

00:24:40.200 a solution

00:24:41.040 starts to

00:24:42.300 emerge

00:24:42.840 you know

00:24:43.100 whenever

00:24:43.320 there's a

00:24:43.800 problem

00:24:44.560 somebody's

00:24:45.500 usually working

00:24:46.060 on the solution

00:24:46.740 right away

00:24:47.240 because you

00:24:47.640 can make

00:24:47.920 money

00:24:48.140 from it

00:24:48.800 I don't

00:24:49.240 see anybody

00:24:49.720 working on

00:24:50.460 a solution

00:24:51.900 to the

00:24:52.300 question

00:24:52.620 of why

00:24:53.640 we the

00:24:54.080 public

00:24:54.460 can't even

00:24:55.360 determine

00:24:55.820 if the

00:24:56.280 experts

00:24:56.660 are lying

00:24:57.160 to us

00:24:57.640 or if

00:24:58.000 they're

00:24:58.100 on the

00:24:58.360 same

00:24:58.540 side

00:24:58.940 or even

00:25:00.140 if they

00:25:00.440 will talk

00:25:00.840 to each

00:25:01.160 other

00:25:01.380 and you

00:25:02.100 know

00:25:02.280 have a

00:25:02.760 conversation

00:25:03.280 we don't

00:25:04.800 get any

00:25:05.180 of that

00:25:05.600 so here's

00:25:07.380 my take

00:25:07.900 until you

00:25:09.060 see

00:25:09.500 debates

00:25:10.940 between

00:25:11.600 pro-vax

00:25:12.720 and anti-vax

00:25:13.680 people

00:25:14.000 on the

00:25:14.800 same

00:25:15.020 platform

00:25:15.520 until you

00:25:16.620 see that

00:25:16.980 you can't

00:25:17.400 know

00:25:17.540 anything

00:25:17.820 and I

00:25:19.200 don't

00:25:19.440 recommend

00:25:19.840 that you

00:25:20.840 assume

00:25:21.220 anything

00:25:22.000 that any

00:25:22.400 of them

00:25:22.620 that they

00:25:22.980 say is

00:25:23.300 true

00:25:23.540 how's that

00:25:26.840 opinion

00:25:27.160 would you

00:25:28.160 agree

00:25:28.520 that until

00:25:29.660 you see

00:25:30.160 both the

00:25:30.880 experts

00:25:31.380 that are

00:25:31.820 pro and

00:25:32.220 con

00:25:32.580 arguing

00:25:33.100 together

00:25:33.640 side by

00:25:34.120 side

00:25:34.480 until you

00:25:35.420 see that

00:25:35.900 everything

00:25:36.500 you know

00:25:36.940 about the

00:25:37.360 vaccination

00:25:37.860 is fuck

00:25:38.560 nothing

00:25:38.900 right

00:25:39.900 it's fuck

00:25:40.300 nothing

00:25:40.640 it's fuck

00:25:42.500 nothing

00:25:42.900 because we

00:25:44.260 don't live

00:25:44.680 in a world

00:25:45.080 where listening

00:25:45.580 to one side

00:25:46.340 has any

00:25:46.980 use

00:25:47.260 at all

00:25:47.600 no use

00:25:48.640 there's no

00:25:49.360 utility

00:25:49.920 to what

00:25:51.160 Laura

00:25:51.460 Ingram's

00:25:52.020 show gave

00:25:52.800 you in

00:25:53.280 terms of

00:25:53.640 deciding

00:25:54.060 it's always

00:25:55.060 good to

00:25:55.360 raise flags

00:25:56.000 so let me

00:25:57.720 acknowledge that

00:25:58.380 raising a

00:25:58.900 flag

00:25:59.340 that's always a

00:26:01.060 useful thing

00:26:01.560 to do

00:26:01.900 but it doesn't

00:26:02.820 give you an

00:26:03.120 answer

00:26:03.420 we're nowhere

00:26:05.200 near an

00:26:05.800 answer

00:26:06.120 and nobody's

00:26:07.440 working on it

00:26:08.080 let me say

00:26:09.240 this again

00:26:09.680 it's the

00:26:10.740 biggest question

00:26:11.760 in the whole

00:26:12.540 fucking country

00:26:13.680 right

00:26:14.860 nobody is

00:26:16.540 working on

00:26:17.740 the solution

00:26:18.320 which is

00:26:18.800 putting the

00:26:20.060 two experts

00:26:20.740 together or

00:26:21.540 more and

00:26:22.720 having them

00:26:23.180 talk at the

00:26:23.700 same time to

00:26:24.340 each other and

00:26:24.940 show their

00:26:25.340 show their

00:26:26.000 work

00:26:26.320 now am I

00:26:28.680 wrong that

00:26:29.220 that would be

00:26:29.900 the answer

00:26:30.500 that you know

00:26:32.980 we've got a

00:26:33.720 government who's

00:26:34.320 saying huh

00:26:35.200 I wonder where

00:26:36.340 we can't convince

00:26:37.320 people to take

00:26:38.040 the vaccination

00:26:38.660 I wonder why

00:26:40.420 well let me

00:26:41.720 tell you why

00:26:42.260 because the way

00:26:43.440 you explain it

00:26:44.360 to us is like

00:26:45.440 a liar

00:26:46.040 okay

00:26:47.460 if you explain

00:26:49.000 it to us

00:26:49.460 exactly the way

00:26:50.560 a liar

00:26:51.340 talks

00:26:52.700 we're not

00:26:53.600 going to

00:26:53.880 fucking believe

00:26:54.600 you

00:26:54.880 doesn't matter

00:26:56.080 if you're

00:26:56.440 right or

00:26:56.800 you're wrong

00:26:57.280 I don't care

00:26:58.360 what your

00:26:58.840 science is

00:26:59.660 if the way

00:27:00.580 you talk to

00:27:01.240 me is exactly

00:27:02.120 like liars

00:27:02.920 talk

00:27:03.420 well I'm not

00:27:04.800 going to

00:27:05.100 fucking believe

00:27:05.780 you

00:27:06.100 so you need

00:27:07.640 to fix that

00:27:08.540 do you know

00:27:09.580 how liars

00:27:10.180 don't talk

00:27:10.900 they show you

00:27:12.780 both of your

00:27:13.600 arguments

00:27:14.220 and they give

00:27:15.660 you plenty

00:27:16.100 of time

00:27:16.600 and maybe

00:27:17.540 they even

00:27:18.080 you know

00:27:18.580 come back

00:27:19.420 and say

00:27:19.720 well you know

00:27:20.520 we were wrong

00:27:20.980 about this

00:27:21.460 but we looked

00:27:22.020 into it

00:27:22.500 probably takes

00:27:23.640 at least

00:27:24.060 two or three

00:27:25.700 iterations

00:27:26.260 of the same

00:27:26.940 two experts

00:27:27.560 talking

00:27:28.020 before you

00:27:28.920 have anything

00:27:29.720 we are so

00:27:31.200 far from

00:27:31.840 anybody

00:27:32.180 even attempting

00:27:33.700 attempting

00:27:35.540 to solve

00:27:36.240 the problem

00:27:36.800 and I want

00:27:39.080 to say this

00:27:39.420 as clearly

00:27:39.820 as possible

00:27:40.320 I'm not

00:27:41.320 complaining

00:27:41.780 that the

00:27:42.200 problem

00:27:42.480 isn't

00:27:42.860 fucking

00:27:43.340 solved

00:27:43.980 the problem

00:27:44.880 of having

00:27:45.460 the two

00:27:45.780 experts

00:27:46.240 talk at

00:27:46.760 the same

00:27:47.020 time

00:27:47.280 I'm saying

00:27:48.280 nobody's

00:27:48.720 working on

00:27:49.200 it

00:27:49.400 and we

00:27:50.440 all know

00:27:50.840 what the

00:27:51.200 fucking

00:27:51.580 answer is

00:27:52.360 put the

00:27:53.200 experts on

00:27:54.000 at the

00:27:54.320 same

00:27:54.660 fucking

00:27:55.220 time

00:27:55.800 somebody

00:27:56.960 put them

00:27:58.540 on at

00:27:59.080 the same

00:27:59.660 fucking

00:28:00.280 time

00:28:01.020 if you

00:28:01.920 don't do

00:28:02.360 that

00:28:02.700 you're not

00:28:03.460 working for

00:28:03.920 the American

00:28:04.340 people

00:28:04.700 you're

00:28:05.000 working for

00:28:05.380 your

00:28:05.540 fucking

00:28:05.900 clicks

00:28:06.320 and your

00:28:06.700 paycheck

00:28:06.980 which is

00:28:07.920 fine

00:28:08.240 it's a

00:28:09.420 free market

00:28:09.860 you can

00:28:10.200 work for

00:28:10.520 your

00:28:10.660 clicks

00:28:10.940 and your

00:28:11.220 paycheck

00:28:11.540 but don't

00:28:12.400 fucking

00:28:12.860 pretend

00:28:13.220 you're

00:28:13.480 helping

00:28:13.720 us

00:28:14.120 because

00:28:14.680 you're

00:28:14.860 not

00:28:15.120 you're

00:28:15.380 making

00:28:15.560 it

00:28:15.740 worse

00:28:16.140 every

00:28:17.280 fucking

00:28:17.800 time

00:28:18.240 you put

00:28:18.940 one

00:28:19.340 expert

00:28:19.660 on

00:28:19.980 without

00:28:20.200 the

00:28:20.460 other

00:28:20.660 side

00:28:21.040 you're

00:28:21.640 making

00:28:21.940 it

00:28:22.160 fucking

00:28:22.580 worse

00:28:23.180 fucking

00:28:25.240 worse

00:28:25.800 here's

00:28:31.840 what we

00:28:32.120 need

00:28:32.380 we need

00:28:32.840 a

00:28:33.160 platform

00:28:33.840 where we

00:28:34.520 can

00:28:34.840 make

00:28:35.360 bets

00:28:35.880 on

00:28:36.320 whether

00:28:36.760 the

00:28:38.720 vaccinated

00:28:39.300 or the

00:28:39.820 unvaccinated

00:28:40.600 die the

00:28:42.180 most

00:28:42.480 over the

00:28:42.820 next year

00:28:43.300 or two

00:28:43.580 now I

00:28:44.920 don't know

00:28:45.220 if we

00:28:45.460 can collect

00:28:45.940 the

00:28:46.280 data on

00:28:47.260 that

00:28:47.520 but let's

00:28:48.580 make it

00:28:48.900 a betting

00:28:49.940 market

00:28:51.000 right

00:28:51.980 you want

00:28:52.900 to be so

00:28:53.360 sure that

00:28:53.880 you're

00:28:54.100 right

00:28:54.400 put your

00:28:55.600 money on

00:28:56.000 it

00:28:56.420 put your

00:28:57.480 money on

00:28:57.860 it

00:28:58.120 how many

00:28:58.760 of you

00:28:59.120 would bet

00:28:59.680 a thousand

00:29:00.340 dollars

00:29:00.860 the

00:29:01.680 vaccinations

00:29:02.320 are

00:29:02.940 more

00:29:03.720 bad

00:29:04.180 than

00:29:04.380 good

00:29:04.700 for

00:29:04.920 people

00:29:05.220 over

00:29:05.460 60

00:29:05.960 go

00:29:06.480 who

00:29:07.500 would

00:29:07.960 bet

00:29:08.100 a thousand

00:29:08.620 dollars

00:29:09.140 that the

00:29:11.380 vaccinated

00:29:11.960 people

00:29:12.380 over 60

00:29:13.140 are going

00:29:14.380 to die

00:29:14.720 at a

00:29:14.940 higher rate

00:29:15.380 than the

00:29:15.680 unvaccinated

00:29:16.360 once you've

00:29:16.920 corrected for

00:29:17.500 all the

00:29:17.740 other

00:29:18.000 variables

00:29:18.700 anybody

00:29:20.180 well there's

00:29:23.060 nobody

00:29:23.340 okay

00:29:23.920 few

00:29:24.420 people

00:29:24.860 few

00:29:28.540 people

00:29:28.880 okay

00:29:29.440 well

00:29:30.400 actually

00:29:30.800 I'm

00:29:31.440 totally

00:29:32.160 surprised

00:29:32.620 at the

00:29:32.900 answers

00:29:33.240 so most

00:29:35.080 of you

00:29:35.320 actually

00:29:35.560 believe

00:29:35.840 that the

00:29:36.140 vaccinations

00:29:36.660 protect

00:29:38.120 people

00:29:38.480 over 60

00:29:39.120 let me

00:29:40.420 hold on

00:29:41.160 stop your

00:29:42.420 answers for

00:29:42.880 a moment

00:29:43.200 let's clear

00:29:43.960 out the

00:29:44.260 cache

00:29:44.620 clear out

00:29:45.820 your

00:29:45.960 because I

00:29:46.760 want to

00:29:46.960 get a

00:29:47.260 sense of

00:29:48.160 what you

00:29:48.500 believe

00:29:49.100 my

00:29:49.560 audience

00:29:49.920 do you

00:29:52.900 believe

00:29:53.240 that

00:29:53.660 vaccinations

00:29:54.820 are more

00:29:55.580 good than

00:29:56.120 bad if

00:29:56.600 you're

00:29:56.740 over 60

00:29:57.360 go

00:29:57.660 over 60

00:29:59.120 vaccinations

00:30:00.020 good or

00:30:00.500 bad

00:30:00.760 all right

00:30:04.620 I'm looking

00:30:04.880 at the

00:30:05.160 answers

00:30:05.400 streaming

00:30:05.760 by

00:30:06.040 mostly

00:30:06.780 saying

00:30:07.120 good

00:30:07.420 but I'm

00:30:07.840 getting

00:30:08.020 some

00:30:08.260 people

00:30:08.500 saying

00:30:08.760 bad

00:30:09.120 yeah

00:30:11.540 it's

00:30:11.800 mixed

00:30:12.180 it's

00:30:12.620 mixed

00:30:13.000 how

00:30:14.760 but how

00:30:15.180 confident

00:30:15.600 are you

00:30:16.040 so when

00:30:17.100 I asked

00:30:17.440 you if

00:30:17.700 you

00:30:17.820 this is

00:30:18.320 interesting

00:30:18.700 when I

00:30:19.460 asked

00:30:19.700 if

00:30:19.860 people

00:30:20.060 would

00:30:20.260 bet

00:30:20.420 a

00:30:20.560 thousand

00:30:20.860 dollars

00:30:21.300 almost

00:30:21.740 very few

00:30:22.600 people

00:30:22.860 said

00:30:23.100 they

00:30:23.260 would

00:30:23.500 but when

00:30:25.020 I said

00:30:25.580 are they

00:30:26.580 helping

00:30:26.860 or hurting

00:30:27.300 then suddenly

00:30:28.000 people were

00:30:28.680 willing to

00:30:29.420 give their

00:30:30.160 opinion

00:30:30.480 am I wrong

00:30:32.240 that there

00:30:32.560 are a lot

00:30:32.800 of people

00:30:33.080 who have

00:30:33.300 opinions

00:30:33.740 that they

00:30:34.140 would not

00:30:34.760 back with

00:30:35.360 their own

00:30:35.720 money

00:30:36.040 that's

00:30:36.980 what it

00:30:37.220 looked

00:30:37.380 like

00:30:37.740 do a

00:30:38.700 lot of

00:30:38.920 you have

00:30:39.220 opinions

00:30:39.620 you would

00:30:39.960 not

00:30:40.180 bet on

00:30:40.800 let me

00:30:42.660 ask you

00:30:42.940 directly

00:30:43.280 well I

00:30:46.880 think

00:30:47.280 you know

00:30:48.080 I'm not

00:30:48.400 going to

00:30:48.560 get anything

00:30:48.880 useful

00:30:49.240 line of

00:30:49.580 the

00:30:50.080 streaming

00:30:50.380 answers

00:30:50.820 interesting

00:30:53.000 all right

00:30:53.820 well I

00:30:54.220 was just

00:30:54.480 interested

00:30:54.880 which way

00:30:56.500 you'd go

00:30:56.800 but

00:30:57.420 why don't

00:30:58.740 we have

00:30:59.020 a betting

00:30:59.480 we should

00:31:00.220 have a

00:31:00.500 betting

00:31:00.720 market

00:31:01.300 for that

00:31:01.700 all right

00:31:04.080 let me

00:31:04.320 give you

00:31:04.740 a persuasion

00:31:06.620 analysis

00:31:07.160 of

00:31:07.520 Carrie

00:31:07.820 Lake

00:31:08.200 which you

00:31:10.220 all want

00:31:10.660 don't you

00:31:11.040 don't you

00:31:12.880 want me to

00:31:13.440 analyze

00:31:13.780 Carrie

00:31:14.080 Lake

00:31:14.380 you know

00:31:14.700 you do

00:31:15.220 you know

00:31:16.180 you do

00:31:16.720 all right

00:31:17.480 here it

00:31:17.700 comes

00:31:17.960 number one

00:31:20.180 I dote

00:31:21.680 that the

00:31:22.120 people on

00:31:22.520 the right

00:31:22.820 often refer

00:31:23.520 to her

00:31:24.020 as a

00:31:24.700 network

00:31:25.840 news

00:31:26.560 veteran

00:31:27.780 right

00:31:29.220 so she's

00:31:29.860 like a

00:31:30.160 network

00:31:30.440 news

00:31:30.780 person

00:31:31.420 but she

00:31:32.980 was a

00:31:33.300 weather

00:31:33.560 person

00:31:34.020 am I

00:31:34.440 right

00:31:34.740 didn't she

00:31:37.360 work on

00:31:37.680 weather

00:31:38.020 can you

00:31:41.300 fact check

00:31:41.840 that

00:31:42.140 I don't

00:31:43.040 think she did

00:31:43.480 regular news

00:31:44.200 she did

00:31:44.500 weather

00:31:44.840 is that

00:31:51.020 true or

00:31:51.300 not

00:31:51.540 because I

00:31:53.980 thought she

00:31:54.360 was an

00:31:54.720 anchor

00:31:55.140 but then I

00:31:55.880 thought her

00:31:56.260 referred to

00:31:57.300 as a

00:31:59.080 meteorologist

00:31:59.860 or something

00:32:00.380 we actually

00:32:02.800 don't know

00:32:03.260 do you

00:32:03.660 interesting

00:32:05.240 so most of

00:32:06.260 you believe

00:32:06.640 she was an 0.87

00:32:07.080 anchor

00:32:07.380 yeah it

00:32:10.240 does make a

00:32:10.700 difference

00:32:11.060 it does make

00:32:11.800 a difference

00:32:12.320 because you

00:32:16.400 wouldn't expect

00:32:17.100 the same

00:32:17.680 the level

00:32:18.700 of let's

00:32:19.360 say gravity

00:32:20.420 gravitas

00:32:21.660 you wouldn't

00:32:22.520 expect the

00:32:23.080 same level

00:32:23.620 of seriousness

00:32:24.740 from the

00:32:25.700 weather person

00:32:26.380 or the

00:32:26.760 sports person

00:32:27.420 as you would

00:32:27.900 from the

00:32:28.360 news anchor

00:32:29.400 right

00:32:30.160 well

00:32:31.300 can somebody

00:32:32.580 google that

00:32:33.660 wikipedia says

00:32:35.180 anchor

00:32:35.580 interesting

00:32:38.580 so was that

00:32:39.720 fake news

00:32:40.300 because I

00:32:40.760 did see

00:32:41.160 I did see

00:32:42.200 somewhere

00:32:43.140 that she

00:32:43.520 was referred

00:32:43.960 to as

00:32:44.400 the weather

00:32:44.980 person

00:32:45.340 did she

00:32:46.280 start with

00:32:46.700 weather

00:32:46.980 and then

00:32:47.300 move to

00:32:47.740 anchor

00:32:48.080 she was

00:32:50.900 an anchor

00:32:51.260 until 2021

00:32:52.160 alright so

00:32:52.780 we're getting

00:32:53.100 the

00:32:53.460 long time

00:32:57.060 anchor

00:32:57.460 started as

00:32:59.460 weather

00:32:59.800 and moved

00:33:00.340 to Arizona

00:33:00.940 as an

00:33:01.360 anchor

00:33:01.580 okay

00:33:01.880 I think

00:33:02.980 that's the

00:33:03.320 answer

00:33:03.500 started as

00:33:04.180 weather

00:33:04.460 and moved

00:33:04.880 to anchor

00:33:05.240 alright

00:33:07.520 so

00:33:08.200 that would

00:33:10.080 explain

00:33:10.560 you know

00:33:11.000 why she

00:33:11.320 has such

00:33:11.660 a good

00:33:12.000 television

00:33:13.180 presence

00:33:13.920 right

00:33:14.360 now here

00:33:15.200 are the

00:33:15.400 things we

00:33:15.780 can agree

00:33:16.140 on

00:33:16.400 very few

00:33:17.780 people are

00:33:18.320 better

00:33:18.680 on camera

00:33:20.020 can we

00:33:21.340 agree on

00:33:21.740 that

00:33:22.000 you'd be

00:33:23.580 you'd have

00:33:24.160 to look

00:33:24.480 a long

00:33:25.400 ways to

00:33:26.120 find somebody

00:33:26.600 better on

00:33:27.040 camera

00:33:27.320 now I'm

00:33:28.340 going to

00:33:28.480 talk about

00:33:29.040 things that

00:33:30.380 are like

00:33:30.780 sexist

00:33:32.360 but it's

00:33:33.620 all part

00:33:34.280 of the

00:33:34.700 persuasion

00:33:35.720 conversation

00:33:36.560 right

00:33:36.860 number

00:33:38.240 one

00:33:38.620 do you

00:33:39.960 think she

00:33:40.260 looks

00:33:40.480 attractive

00:33:41.000 I'll

00:33:42.440 ask my

00:33:42.880 audience

00:33:43.200 before I

00:33:43.640 give you

00:33:43.940 my opinion

00:33:44.540 yes

00:33:45.760 yes

00:33:46.400 universally

00:33:47.120 yes

00:33:47.500 do you

00:33:49.440 feel

00:33:49.900 that she's

00:33:52.180 attractive

00:33:52.660 in a

00:33:53.360 feminine

00:33:53.920 way

00:33:54.520 or something

00:33:56.080 else

00:33:56.500 does she

00:33:59.000 strike you 0.66

00:34:00.120 as feminine

00:34:00.860 a little

00:34:06.620 bit of

00:34:08.220 opinions

00:34:08.680 there

00:34:09.040 so that

00:34:09.800 is

00:34:09.980 interesting

00:34:10.420 she

00:34:12.620 is

00:34:13.320 for

00:34:16.820 sure

00:34:17.220 very

00:34:18.620 attractive

00:34:19.080 but she

00:34:20.220 she cuts 1.00

00:34:21.020 masculine

00:34:21.620 and feminine

00:34:22.580 doesn't

00:34:22.940 she

00:34:23.100 she

00:34:24.000 she kind

00:34:24.500 of hits

00:34:24.760 a mix

00:34:25.220 I don't

00:34:26.360 want to

00:34:26.560 say

00:34:26.680 androgynous

00:34:27.360 because

00:34:27.560 that's

00:34:27.860 that's

00:34:28.680 like a

00:34:28.920 different

00:34:29.100 sense

00:34:29.560 I would

00:34:31.220 I would

00:34:31.640 say that

00:34:32.200 sort of

00:34:33.380 like Mick

00:34:33.820 Jagger

00:34:34.240 you know

00:34:36.340 or David

00:34:36.820 Bowie

00:34:37.200 where

00:34:38.420 where

00:34:38.740 there

00:34:38.920 there's

00:34:39.420 there's

00:34:39.680 sort of

00:34:39.960 an

00:34:40.100 ambiguity

00:34:40.560 that you

00:34:41.200 register

00:34:41.800 but you're

00:34:43.520 but it's

00:34:43.880 an attractive 0.55

00:34:44.440 ambiguity

00:34:45.140 meaning that

00:34:46.600 I think

00:34:46.980 probably

00:34:47.680 both men

00:34:48.340 and women

00:34:48.720 find her

00:34:49.180 attractive

00:34:49.560 I would

00:34:50.280 imagine

00:34:50.600 yeah

00:34:51.420 and it

00:34:51.660 makes her 0.95

00:34:51.940 look

00:34:52.080 stronger

00:34:52.520 because

00:34:52.800 she's

00:34:53.000 got a

00:34:53.240 little

00:34:53.360 bit

00:34:53.560 of the

00:34:53.920 masculine

00:34:54.960 edge

00:34:55.540 with the

00:34:56.180 feminine

00:34:56.600 pluses

00:34:58.340 as well

00:34:58.780 yeah

00:35:00.000 and she's

00:35:01.920 married to

00:35:02.340 a man

00:35:02.660 of course

00:35:03.080 right

00:35:03.520 so

00:35:04.640 so here's

00:35:07.780 my first

00:35:08.420 persuasion

00:35:09.260 point

00:35:09.760 she has

00:35:11.420 a type

00:35:12.300 of attractiveness

00:35:13.160 that is

00:35:14.340 ideal

00:35:14.920 it's ideal

00:35:16.620 for politics

00:35:17.960 would you

00:35:18.560 agree

00:35:18.820 it's not

00:35:20.160 just

00:35:20.520 attractive

00:35:21.140 because

00:35:22.020 Christy

00:35:22.780 Noem

00:35:23.140 has an

00:35:23.640 attractiveness

00:35:24.400 that is

00:35:25.820 super

00:35:26.200 attractive

00:35:26.620 as a

00:35:27.160 woman 0.99

00:35:27.440 super

00:35:28.980 feminine

00:35:29.420 well not

00:35:31.040 super

00:35:31.320 feminine

00:35:31.680 but feminine

00:35:32.220 right

00:35:32.700 but I

00:35:34.200 think that

00:35:34.560 that would

00:35:34.820 turn off

00:35:35.260 some voters

00:35:35.800 I think

00:35:36.940 the Christy

00:35:37.700 Noem

00:35:38.060 type of

00:35:38.500 attractiveness

00:35:39.180 would cause

00:35:40.580 some people

00:35:41.220 and maybe

00:35:41.880 even women 0.95

00:35:42.460 more than

00:35:42.880 men

00:35:43.120 to

00:35:44.120 grade her

00:35:46.560 more harshly

00:35:47.340 because she

00:35:48.040 looks a little

00:35:49.520 less

00:35:50.000 to some

00:35:51.340 people

00:35:51.700 might look

00:35:53.020 less substantial

00:35:53.920 because she

00:35:54.880 looked more

00:35:55.380 feminine

00:35:55.940 I guess

00:35:56.580 now I'm

00:35:57.840 talking about

00:35:58.260 people's

00:35:58.680 biases here

00:35:59.300 I'm not

00:35:59.580 talking about

00:36:00.060 my opinion

00:36:00.620 I'm talking

00:36:01.020 about people's

00:36:01.680 biases

00:36:02.040 but Carrie

00:36:03.200 Lake doesn't

00:36:03.640 have that

00:36:03.940 problem

00:36:04.240 does she

00:36:04.640 she registers

00:36:06.120 as attractive

00:36:07.320 as a woman

00:36:08.080 without giving

00:36:09.880 up anything

00:36:10.660 in strength

00:36:11.480 to the

00:36:13.100 over femininity 1.00

00:36:14.600 you know

00:36:15.360 maybe bias

00:36:16.380 right

00:36:16.980 so I would

00:36:17.980 say I've

00:36:18.300 never seen

00:36:18.700 anybody who

00:36:19.280 has a better

00:36:20.000 look for

00:36:20.780 politics

00:36:21.360 and what

00:36:23.580 is her

00:36:24.260 ethnicity

00:36:24.740 I've never

00:36:26.840 seen that

00:36:27.280 mentioned

00:36:27.700 her ethnicity

00:36:29.180 is

00:36:29.980 her ethnicity

00:36:33.500 is hot

00:36:34.040 somebody said

00:36:35.080 but she's 0.97

00:36:36.840 brownish

00:36:37.480 right

00:36:37.800 again

00:36:38.940 we're just

00:36:40.160 talking about

00:36:40.580 the persuasion

00:36:41.800 here so

00:36:42.340 don't assume

00:36:43.580 I'm being

00:36:44.000 bigoted or

00:36:44.760 anything else

00:36:45.400 we're just

00:36:45.720 talking about

00:36:46.140 what people

00:36:47.240 perceive

00:36:47.820 so it's

00:36:50.800 just an

00:36:51.100 Arizona

00:36:51.460 tan

00:36:51.860 she's just

00:36:52.480 well tanned

00:36:53.040 so that

00:36:54.380 works really

00:36:54.860 well for her

00:36:55.340 doesn't it

00:36:55.740 I don't know

00:36:56.360 what she is

00:36:56.940 but she's 0.97

00:36:57.400 ambiguous

00:36:57.800 and she's

00:36:59.080 pretty brown

00:36:59.600 for maybe

00:37:02.020 a white girl 0.70

00:37:02.700 I don't know

00:37:03.280 whatever she

00:37:03.900 is

00:37:04.180 so I don't

00:37:05.140 care

00:37:05.540 but I think

00:37:06.900 that works

00:37:07.360 too

00:37:07.600 so I think

00:37:09.100 she works

00:37:09.540 on color

00:37:10.460 look

00:37:10.940 haircut

00:37:11.440 femininity

00:37:13.040 just the right

00:37:13.980 amount of

00:37:14.620 you know

00:37:14.980 not too

00:37:15.400 feminine

00:37:15.740 a little bit

00:37:16.260 of masculinity

00:37:16.880 put in there

00:37:17.700 yeah she's

00:37:18.900 she's got

00:37:19.760 the perfect

00:37:20.300 look

00:37:20.840 but let's

00:37:21.900 talk about

00:37:22.240 her voice

00:37:22.840 have you ever

00:37:24.640 heard a voice

00:37:25.260 like hers 0.95

00:37:25.940 it's really

00:37:27.980 unique

00:37:28.500 yeah

00:37:29.120 it's fun

00:37:29.920 to listen

00:37:30.360 to

00:37:30.640 but let me

00:37:31.880 tell you

00:37:32.160 the trick

00:37:32.540 that she

00:37:32.920 uses

00:37:33.280 that I've

00:37:34.020 talked about

00:37:34.440 before

00:37:34.820 but when you

00:37:35.320 see it

00:37:35.700 in practice

00:37:36.240 it's awesome

00:37:37.640 she's a

00:37:39.960 down talker

00:37:40.780 do you know

00:37:42.500 what an up

00:37:42.820 talker is

00:37:43.340 right

00:37:43.560 so up

00:37:45.420 talkers

00:37:45.940 sound

00:37:46.980 unconfident

00:37:47.820 an up

00:37:49.420 talker

00:37:49.740 would sound

00:37:50.100 like this

00:37:50.620 I think

00:37:51.580 we need

00:37:51.940 to lower

00:37:52.760 taxes

00:37:53.140 we need

00:37:54.860 to close

00:37:55.820 the border

00:37:56.220 and then

00:37:57.760 the other

00:37:58.040 thing that

00:37:58.540 bad politicians

00:37:59.560 do

00:37:59.960 is they

00:38:01.300 they bleat

00:38:03.060 like sheep

00:38:04.020 when they're

00:38:05.700 when they don't

00:38:06.420 believe their

00:38:06.900 own argument

00:38:07.580 they adopt

00:38:10.180 a pleading

00:38:12.120 kind of a

00:38:12.800 tone

00:38:13.180 that signals

00:38:14.880 they don't

00:38:15.280 believe their

00:38:15.720 own argument

00:38:16.220 right

00:38:17.040 so I was

00:38:19.160 watching her

00:38:19.680 on

00:38:20.200 on Tucker's

00:38:21.800 show

00:38:21.940 there was

00:38:22.180 some video

00:38:22.600 of her

00:38:22.880 and watching

00:38:24.340 her talk

00:38:25.000 there is a

00:38:26.080 time when she

00:38:26.760 down talks

00:38:27.600 perfectly

00:38:28.160 and let me

00:38:29.100 give you an

00:38:29.420 example of

00:38:29.880 down talk

00:38:30.360 down talk

00:38:31.300 is the

00:38:31.580 opposite of

00:38:32.280 ending on

00:38:32.720 a high

00:38:33.000 point

00:38:33.300 if you end

00:38:34.460 on a down

00:38:34.960 point you

00:38:35.360 sound like

00:38:35.860 an executive

00:38:36.400 right

00:38:37.720 because you're

00:38:38.420 saying everything

00:38:38.940 is matter

00:38:39.340 of fact

00:38:39.680 so here's

00:38:40.900 I'll try to

00:38:41.740 do an

00:38:41.960 impression

00:38:42.320 of proper

00:38:43.720 confident

00:38:44.960 executive

00:38:45.880 down talk

00:38:46.900 right

00:38:48.580 so first

00:38:50.020 I'll give

00:38:50.280 you the

00:38:50.620 the contrast

00:38:51.740 an up talk

00:38:52.540 would be

00:38:53.000 and we need

00:38:54.140 we need

00:38:54.640 nuclear energy

00:38:55.900 plants

00:38:56.220 we've got to

00:38:57.080 have nuclear

00:38:57.600 energy plants

00:38:58.300 or we'll never

00:38:58.940 be able to

00:38:59.360 reach our

00:38:59.760 our goals

00:39:00.640 we'll never

00:39:00.980 have enough

00:39:01.300 energy

00:39:01.620 we have to

00:39:02.960 have nuclear

00:39:03.740 energy plants

00:39:04.540 that's a

00:39:05.420 pleading voice

00:39:06.340 doesn't sound

00:39:07.540 powerful

00:39:07.960 now here's

00:39:09.380 the executive

00:39:09.960 and the only

00:39:11.740 way we're

00:39:12.140 going to

00:39:12.680 be able to

00:39:13.140 give power

00:39:13.580 in the future

00:39:14.140 is through

00:39:15.100 nuclear power

00:39:15.980 nuclear power

00:39:17.560 will allow us

00:39:18.780 to have

00:39:20.560 enough energy

00:39:21.080 in the future

00:39:21.620 and at the

00:39:22.380 moment there's

00:39:22.920 no alternative

00:39:23.640 now forget

00:39:26.680 about whether

00:39:27.140 that's true

00:39:27.820 but you see

00:39:29.100 you see what

00:39:29.580 I'm talking

00:39:29.880 about right

00:39:30.240 the way I

00:39:31.340 said it

00:39:31.920 tells you

00:39:33.220 it's not up

00:39:33.960 for debate

00:39:34.580 it's not up

00:39:36.860 for debate

00:39:37.400 I'm telling

00:39:38.100 you what

00:39:38.420 the facts

00:39:38.880 are

00:39:39.160 and then

00:39:39.780 you have

00:39:40.100 to decide

00:39:40.560 what to

00:39:40.860 do with

00:39:41.100 that

00:39:41.320 when

00:39:42.420 and I

00:39:43.140 was watching

00:39:43.600 Carrie Lake

00:39:44.460 when she was

00:39:45.120 talking about

00:39:46.120 the media

00:39:46.680 in the area

00:39:47.860 which she has

00:39:48.560 you know

00:39:48.860 complete expertise

00:39:49.780 and when she

00:39:51.340 talked about

00:39:51.720 the media

00:39:52.100 she used

00:39:52.940 down talk

00:39:53.760 and wow

00:39:55.060 is it

00:39:55.680 so effective

00:39:57.240 but

00:39:58.700 for a moment

00:40:00.380 she transitioned

00:40:01.700 into what

00:40:02.540 I'll call

00:40:02.920 the talking

00:40:04.160 points

00:40:04.680 the generic

00:40:06.820 stuff about

00:40:07.720 you know

00:40:08.480 Democrats

00:40:09.020 are trying

00:40:09.560 to ruin

00:40:09.940 everything

00:40:10.440 blah blah 0.97

00:40:10.880 and she

00:40:11.840 and she

00:40:12.480 slipped

00:40:13.040 into

00:40:13.620 pleading

00:40:14.500 and you

00:40:16.160 could tell

00:40:16.520 the transition

00:40:17.180 between the

00:40:17.780 things she

00:40:18.200 was completely

00:40:18.820 confident about

00:40:19.820 and had a

00:40:20.520 right to be

00:40:20.920 confident

00:40:21.280 and the

00:40:22.480 things that

00:40:23.060 were clearly

00:40:24.620 propaganda

00:40:25.640 politics

00:40:27.080 kind of

00:40:27.520 stuff

00:40:27.840 that is

00:40:29.080 really

00:40:29.340 salesmanship

00:40:30.140 right

00:40:31.540 and you

00:40:32.060 could see

00:40:32.360 her shift 0.93

00:40:32.880 from

00:40:33.820 this is

00:40:34.440 just

00:40:34.660 fact

00:40:35.100 you know

00:40:36.500 get out

00:40:37.160 of my

00:40:37.400 way

00:40:37.700 this is

00:40:38.420 just

00:40:38.660 a fact

00:40:39.220 that part

00:40:40.620 is so

00:40:41.120 strong

00:40:41.620 but as soon

00:40:43.140 as she gets

00:40:43.580 into the

00:40:44.160 politics

00:40:44.740 she gets

00:40:45.620 a little

00:40:46.040 pleady

00:40:47.200 and then she

00:40:48.000 loses

00:40:48.300 some of that

00:40:48.820 strength

00:40:49.240 I think

00:40:50.880 she could

00:40:51.300 change her

00:40:52.060 talking points

00:40:53.200 to maintain

00:40:54.580 the strength

00:40:55.240 all the way

00:40:55.680 through

00:40:56.020 and then it

00:40:57.000 would just

00:40:57.280 be devastating

00:40:57.960 yeah the

00:41:01.000 up talk

00:41:01.420 makes you

00:41:01.860 sound

00:41:02.120 insecure

00:41:02.620 that's

00:41:03.080 true

00:41:03.620 correct

00:41:05.760 so I

00:41:08.740 usually don't

00:41:09.520 make a big

00:41:10.360 deal about

00:41:10.940 the quality

00:41:11.860 of voice

00:41:12.460 for persuasion

00:41:13.500 the exception

00:41:15.200 is when the

00:41:15.900 quality of the

00:41:16.600 voice is

00:41:17.140 amazing

00:41:17.860 and I think

00:41:19.020 Obama had

00:41:19.680 that

00:41:19.960 Obama had

00:41:21.060 the voice

00:41:21.640 he stammered

00:41:22.840 too much

00:41:23.200 but he had

00:41:23.980 the voice

00:41:24.440 it just

00:41:24.780 sounded

00:41:25.260 he just

00:41:26.220 liked the

00:41:26.660 timbre of

00:41:27.180 it

00:41:27.380 right

00:41:27.740 so if

00:41:29.200 you have

00:41:29.400 an extremely

00:41:30.040 good voice

00:41:30.760 as she

00:41:31.160 does

00:41:31.540 then it's

00:41:32.420 an asset

00:41:32.900 but for

00:41:33.980 most people

00:41:34.400 it doesn't

00:41:34.640 make much

00:41:35.000 difference

00:41:35.420 yeah

00:41:38.500 all right

00:41:40.040 and that

00:41:42.660 ladies and 0.98

00:41:43.200 gentlemen

00:41:43.480 is my

00:41:46.060 grumpy

00:41:46.560 opinion

00:41:47.240 for today

00:41:47.820 I've got

00:41:50.020 to go fix

00:41:50.480 my coffee

00:41:51.020 maker

00:41:51.400 might set

00:41:52.560 me on a

00:41:53.000 better

00:41:53.400 trajectory

00:41:53.960 for today

00:41:54.640 so I

00:42:02.820 my doctor

00:42:04.140 asked me

00:42:04.700 to test

00:42:05.360 my blood

00:42:06.180 pressure

00:42:06.500 at home

00:42:06.820 so it's

00:42:08.360 just a

00:42:08.680 normal thing

00:42:09.240 if you're

00:42:09.720 on blood

00:42:10.200 pressure

00:42:10.520 meds

00:42:10.980 the new

00:42:12.120 remote

00:42:12.780 medical

00:42:13.740 practices

00:42:14.420 are that

00:42:15.000 they ask

00:42:15.620 you to get

00:42:15.980 a blood

00:42:16.660 pressure

00:42:16.980 monitor

00:42:17.440 and just

00:42:17.820 do it

00:42:18.040 yourself

00:42:18.320 so I was

00:42:19.500 testing it

00:42:20.200 and I

00:42:20.820 noticed in

00:42:21.280 the instructions

00:42:21.920 on the

00:42:22.320 email

00:42:22.600 that asked

00:42:23.600 me to

00:42:23.860 test my

00:42:24.340 blood

00:42:24.580 pressure

00:42:24.860 it said

00:42:26.080 don't do

00:42:26.600 it within

00:42:26.960 30 minutes

00:42:27.620 of having

00:42:28.020 coffee

00:42:28.440 and I

00:42:30.900 didn't read

00:42:31.300 that part

00:42:31.780 or I'd

00:42:32.080 forgotten it

00:42:32.720 and so I

00:42:34.100 randomly sat

00:42:35.060 down after I

00:42:35.800 came back

00:42:36.140 from Starbucks

00:42:36.960 and I

00:42:38.340 tested my

00:42:38.800 blood

00:42:38.980 pressure

00:42:39.480 have you

00:42:43.140 ever done

00:42:43.500 that

00:42:43.800 test your

00:42:44.780 blood

00:42:45.000 pressure

00:42:45.340 directly

00:42:46.120 after you

00:42:46.740 come back

00:42:47.120 from

00:42:47.300 Starbucks

00:42:47.860 it was

00:42:49.520 hospitalization

00:42:50.560 level

00:42:50.940 it was

00:42:53.000 like

00:42:53.260 it was

00:42:53.900 like

00:42:54.080 9-1-1

00:42:54.860 so

00:42:57.980 I wait

00:42:59.260 three hours

00:43:00.720 and I

00:43:01.020 test it

00:43:01.440 again

00:43:01.740 120

00:43:03.440 over 80

00:43:04.020 no problem

00:43:05.420 but

00:43:06.960 half an

00:43:07.780 hour after

00:43:08.300 I had

00:43:08.600 Starbucks

00:43:09.120 it was

00:43:09.960 actually

00:43:10.360 literally

00:43:11.860 I would

00:43:13.860 probably

00:43:14.480 drive to

00:43:14.940 the hospital

00:43:15.500 it was

00:43:16.920 like

00:43:17.080 160

00:43:17.720 over

00:43:18.240 120

00:43:21.360 or

00:43:21.740 some

00:43:22.160 fucking

00:43:22.480 thing

00:43:22.800 yeah

00:43:23.320 it was

00:43:23.440 like

00:43:23.600 160

00:43:24.160 over

00:43:24.500 something

00:43:24.860 can you

00:43:33.960 lower your

00:43:34.420 BP

00:43:34.680 with

00:43:34.940 meditation

00:43:35.700 I doubt

00:43:37.360 it

00:43:37.640 I mean

00:43:40.260 I don't

00:43:40.800 know that

00:43:41.080 you can

00:43:41.340 get it

00:43:41.560 all the

00:43:41.760 way

00:43:41.860 down

00:43:42.080 now

00:43:43.560 I am

00:43:44.780 also

00:43:45.060 wondering

00:43:45.500 if my

00:43:46.700 pain

00:43:48.240 and energy

00:43:48.700 is related

00:43:49.220 to the

00:43:49.520 blood

00:43:49.700 pressure

00:43:50.020 meds

00:43:50.420 as

00:43:50.600 possible

00:43:51.000 yeah

00:43:52.040 you can

00:43:52.520 survive

00:43:52.900 160

00:43:53.440 you just

00:43:53.880 don't

00:43:54.040 want to

00:43:54.240 do it

00:43:54.420 for a

00:43:54.640 long

00:43:54.800 time

00:43:55.080 that's

00:43:56.100 a little

00:43:56.320 bit of

00:43:56.600 hyperbole

00:43:57.140 from me

00:43:58.380 hypnosis

00:44:03.500 yeah

00:44:04.160 all the

00:44:04.800 lifestyle

00:44:05.220 stuff

00:44:05.640 does

00:44:05.960 work

00:44:06.420 but if

00:44:07.420 you have

00:44:07.660 a genetic

00:44:08.380 propensity

00:44:10.760 I'm about

00:44:13.160 as close

00:44:13.800 as you

00:44:14.140 can get

00:44:14.640 to

00:44:15.560 lifestyle

00:44:16.520 acceptable

00:44:18.360 behavior

00:44:19.400 you know

00:44:20.940 I do

00:44:22.600 pretty well

00:44:23.080 I don't

00:44:23.460 sleep as

00:44:23.880 much as

00:44:24.220 I should

00:44:24.520 do you

00:44:32.560 think

00:44:32.780 Biden's

00:44:33.300 doing

00:44:33.540 well

00:44:34.180 I can't

00:44:37.260 see that

00:44:37.640 in his

00:44:38.460 China

00:44:38.760 stuff

00:44:39.120 well

00:44:40.140 I don't

00:44:43.280 know what's

00:44:43.660 going on

00:44:44.060 with China

00:44:44.520 I feel

00:44:45.660 like all

00:44:46.080 of our

00:44:46.380 news is

00:44:46.800 so

00:44:47.140 inaccurate

00:44:48.260 no I'm

00:44:51.120 not taking

00:44:51.500 any

00:44:51.800 NSAIDs

00:44:53.020 you once

00:44:57.400 snorted a

00:44:57.980 caterpillar

00:44:58.440 okay

00:44:59.520 why am I

00:45:03.520 avoiding

00:45:03.940 Daryl

00:45:04.500 Brooks

00:45:04.940 as a

00:45:05.440 topic

00:45:05.800 apparently

00:45:07.200 I'm avoiding

00:45:08.020 Daryl

00:45:08.620 Brooks

00:45:09.020 as a

00:45:09.460 topic

00:45:09.820 because

00:45:12.360 I never

00:45:12.800 heard that

00:45:13.120 name

00:45:13.360 before

00:45:13.860 let's

00:45:14.700 see

00:45:15.080 let's

00:45:16.060 see who

00:45:16.300 exactly

00:45:16.680 I am

00:45:17.280 ignoring

00:45:17.880 Daryl

00:45:20.960 Brooks

00:45:21.820 he's a

00:45:27.080 defendant

00:45:27.500 he cries

00:45:28.700 during his

00:45:29.180 opening

00:45:29.480 statement

00:45:30.180 what did

00:45:32.840 he do

00:45:33.220 oh is

00:45:37.360 he the

00:45:37.640 guy who

00:45:38.300 ran over

00:45:39.100 the

00:45:39.460 Waukesha

00:45:40.660 Christmas

00:45:41.200 parade

00:45:41.580 trial

00:45:41.920 why would

00:45:44.900 I want

00:45:45.160 to talk

00:45:45.420 about him

00:45:45.880 why in

00:45:48.560 the world

00:45:48.940 would that

00:45:49.320 be interesting

00:45:49.900 yeah

00:45:55.280 no I

00:45:56.780 really I

00:45:57.220 know I

00:45:57.580 remember what

00:45:58.080 the story

00:45:58.440 was that

00:45:59.120 you know

00:45:59.400 they reported

00:46:00.040 his car

00:46:00.600 killed people

00:46:01.260 etc

00:46:01.700 but

00:46:02.760 there's no

00:46:04.800 reason to

00:46:05.660 oh by the

00:46:08.240 way speaking

00:46:08.720 of yay

00:46:09.160 I told you

00:46:13.480 I can't

00:46:14.840 watch anything

00:46:15.400 on the

00:46:15.880 daily wire

00:46:16.560 because every

00:46:17.000 time I try

00:46:17.460 to sign up

00:46:18.060 it's too

00:46:19.480 hard

00:46:19.800 and I

00:46:22.740 got some

00:46:23.100 help from

00:46:23.720 one of

00:46:25.740 you I

00:46:26.060 won't

00:46:26.500 mention

00:46:26.880 you

00:46:27.120 who sent

00:46:28.100 lengthy

00:46:28.700 instructions

00:46:29.320 of how

00:46:29.860 to do

00:46:30.100 it and

00:46:30.320 I was

00:46:30.460 like oh

00:46:30.780 thank you

00:46:31.260 and then

00:46:32.100 I got

00:46:33.140 busy and

00:46:33.740 then I

00:46:33.980 lost those

00:46:34.440 instructions

00:46:34.900 so if

00:46:37.580 I can't

00:46:37.960 sign up

00:46:38.240 quickly it's

00:46:38.800 just not

00:46:39.120 going to

00:46:39.300 happen

00:46:39.540 because I

00:46:40.060 get too

00:46:40.540 interrupted

00:46:40.980 so if

00:46:42.160 I can

00:46:42.420 sign up

00:46:43.260 for a

00:46:43.520 service in

00:46:44.040 60 seconds

00:46:44.920 which is how

00:46:46.060 long it

00:46:46.420 should take

00:46:46.980 because all

00:46:47.720 you're doing

00:46:48.040 is putting

00:46:48.480 into your

00:46:48.800 credentials

00:46:49.280 then I'll

00:46:50.880 sign up

00:46:51.320 but as

00:46:52.740 soon as

00:46:53.100 it takes

00:46:53.720 me to

00:46:54.100 another

00:46:54.380 site

00:46:54.880 or wants

00:46:56.380 me to

00:46:56.820 do

00:46:57.180 something

00:46:57.740 anything

00:46:58.800 out of

00:46:59.100 the ordinary

00:46:59.480 I'm like

00:46:59.920 I'll get

00:47:00.360 back to

00:47:00.680 that later

00:47:01.080 it never

00:47:01.440 happens

00:47:01.820 no I

00:47:04.340 don't believe

00:47:04.700 I am on

00:47:05.120 the spectrum

00:47:05.700 I don't

00:47:07.840 believe I

00:47:08.260 am

00:47:08.580 have you

00:47:11.400 tried a

00:47:11.720 sauna to

00:47:12.180 relieve

00:47:12.500 pain

00:47:12.940 no

00:47:16.780 but I

00:47:17.700 don't

00:47:17.840 like

00:47:18.080 heat

00:47:18.500 so I

00:47:19.420 don't

00:47:19.520 know

00:47:19.660 if I

00:47:19.860 can

00:47:19.980 handle

00:47:20.220 that

00:47:20.500 yeah

00:47:24.760 the

00:47:25.420 SUV

00:47:25.780 guy

00:47:26.040 representing

00:47:26.760 himself

00:47:27.140 would be

00:47:27.460 fun

00:47:27.720 I do

00:47:29.600 have an

00:47:29.960 infrared

00:47:30.240 sauna

00:47:30.600 I've

00:47:30.940 never

00:47:31.120 used

00:47:31.360 it

00:47:32.220 I hear

00:47:34.560 good

00:47:34.760 things

00:47:35.000 about

00:47:35.200 him

00:47:35.320 but I

00:47:35.520 just

00:47:35.680 I

00:47:36.000 don't

00:47:36.100 like

00:47:36.300 heat

00:47:36.560 so

00:47:43.180 did you

00:47:44.700 see that

00:47:45.300 Ye used

00:47:46.420 the R

00:47:46.980 word

00:47:47.380 on a

00:47:48.100 video

00:47:48.380 and he

00:47:49.460 stopped

00:47:49.820 himself

00:47:50.180 before he

00:47:50.720 used it

00:47:51.220 but then

00:47:52.040 he used

00:47:52.400 it anyway

00:47:52.900 because

00:47:53.400 he's just

00:47:54.920 done

00:47:55.260 censoring

00:47:55.980 himself

00:47:56.400 so he

00:47:58.000 called

00:47:58.440 somebody

00:47:58.800 a

00:47:59.940 tard 0.98

00:48:00.240 and I

00:48:02.060 thought to

00:48:02.360 myself

00:48:02.720 well he's

00:48:03.760 gone so

00:48:04.260 far that

00:48:04.680 he can

00:48:04.960 say that

00:48:05.360 now

00:48:05.580 right

00:48:05.820 because

00:48:06.480 you know

00:48:07.020 I think

00:48:08.780 at this

00:48:09.080 point

00:48:09.440 I think

00:48:16.100 at this

00:48:16.340 point

00:48:16.560 Kanye

00:48:16.900 can say

00:48:17.300 anything

00:48:17.540 I just

00:48:17.900 saw a

00:48:18.140 comment

00:48:18.380 go by

00:48:18.740 that made

00:48:19.040 me laugh

00:48:19.340 when you

00:48:20.820 say that

00:48:21.260 you have

00:48:21.660 generalized

00:48:22.320 pain

00:48:22.900 it turns

00:48:24.000 out that

00:48:24.460 the possible

00:48:25.360 causes of

00:48:26.120 it are

00:48:27.040 everything

00:48:27.600 you do

00:48:28.160 so I've

00:48:30.040 had people

00:48:30.440 suggest that

00:48:31.140 it's everything

00:48:31.600 from my

00:48:32.440 diet to

00:48:33.360 you name it

00:48:34.300 so I have

00:48:35.400 a list of

00:48:35.960 probably 20

00:48:37.320 different things

00:48:38.220 that are

00:48:38.900 entirely possible

00:48:39.800 like I'm not

00:48:41.000 I wouldn't

00:48:41.400 rule out

00:48:41.860 diet at all

00:48:42.700 but there are

00:48:43.840 at least 20

00:48:44.620 things that

00:48:46.080 I'm going to

00:48:46.380 have to isolate

00:48:47.020 one at a

00:48:47.680 time to see

00:48:48.280 if they make

00:48:48.700 a difference

00:48:49.180 so I don't

00:48:51.720 think it's

00:48:52.020 aging because

00:48:52.580 it happened

00:48:52.920 all at once

00:48:53.500 aging would

00:48:55.860 have been

00:48:56.060 more gradual

00:48:56.980 I mean I

00:48:57.980 could certainly

00:48:58.440 see what

00:48:58.840 aging does

00:48:59.400 but I

00:48:59.900 just fell

00:49:00.280 off a

00:49:00.680 table

00:49:02.220 yeah it

00:49:10.100 could be

00:49:10.380 the BP

00:49:10.780 meds

00:49:11.180 somebody

00:49:12.180 mentioned

00:49:12.860 that they

00:49:13.240 had the

00:49:13.480 same

00:49:13.640 problem

00:49:14.020 and they

00:49:14.480 got off

00:49:14.820 their meds

00:49:15.420 and they

00:49:16.120 felt fine

00:49:16.660 I suppose

00:49:17.980 I could

00:49:19.300 probably just

00:49:19.820 stop taking

00:49:20.400 it for a

00:49:20.720 day and

00:49:21.020 see if it

00:49:21.340 matters

00:49:21.680 blue balls

00:49:24.260 is that

00:49:26.720 it do I

00:49:27.080 need to

00:49:27.320 get laid 0.82

00:49:27.720 maybe

00:49:30.940 that's

00:49:31.240 all it

00:49:31.560 is

00:49:31.740 I don't

00:49:34.760 know I

00:49:34.920 think I'm

00:49:35.300 going to

00:49:35.640 give up

00:49:36.000 on humans

00:49:37.580 oh yeah

00:49:43.760 the Steve

00:49:44.260 Bannon

00:49:44.580 sentencing

00:49:45.200 is happening

00:49:45.760 right now

00:49:46.360 now he

00:49:46.820 could get

00:49:48.100 up to

00:49:48.360 two years

00:49:49.140 for

00:49:49.940 refusing to

00:49:52.120 testify

00:49:52.700 was that

00:49:53.480 what it

00:49:54.000 was

00:49:54.280 yeah it's

00:49:59.740 definitely

00:50:00.000 not

00:50:00.240 shingles

00:50:00.700 all right

00:50:04.320 contempt of

00:50:05.720 congress

00:50:06.220 you think

00:50:07.760 contempt of

00:50:08.480 congress would

00:50:09.120 be more

00:50:09.660 like an

00:50:10.000 award

00:50:10.480 shouldn't

00:50:12.360 you get

00:50:12.680 like a

00:50:13.180 medal

00:50:13.460 and now

00:50:14.840 I'd like

00:50:15.420 to give

00:50:15.720 the

00:50:16.080 prestigious

00:50:16.920 citizen of

00:50:19.580 the year

00:50:19.880 award

00:50:20.420 to Steve

00:50:21.020 Bannon

00:50:21.360 for

00:50:23.440 contempt of

00:50:24.220 congress

00:50:24.680 we would

00:50:26.000 all like

00:50:26.520 to be

00:50:26.860 like Steve

00:50:27.480 and show

00:50:28.140 our contempt

00:50:28.760 for congress

00:50:29.380 but only

00:50:29.820 Steve

00:50:30.240 was brave

00:50:31.520 enough to

00:50:31.920 do it

00:50:32.320 so Steve

00:50:33.840 for

00:50:35.580 contempt of

00:50:36.440 congress

00:50:36.880 we give you

00:50:38.200 the citizen

00:50:38.900 of the year

00:50:39.480 award

00:50:39.900 but apparently

00:50:42.140 they actually

00:50:42.780 punish you

00:50:43.340 for having

00:50:43.820 the same

00:50:44.200 opinion as

00:50:44.800 everybody

00:50:45.200 and acting

00:50:46.720 the same

00:50:47.120 way ordinary

00:50:48.120 people would

00:50:48.720 act

00:50:53.980 I know

00:50:54.800 the trouble

00:50:55.680 is you

00:50:56.480 don't want

00:50:56.880 a Nelson

00:50:57.380 Mandela

00:50:57.960 Steve Bannon

00:50:58.780 he'll come

00:50:59.560 back as

00:51:00.060 the president

00:51:00.640 you put

00:51:03.480 Steve Bannon

00:51:04.060 in jail for

00:51:05.080 two years

00:51:05.640 and he's

00:51:05.960 going to

00:51:06.600 come back

00:51:07.040 as Christ

00:51:07.740 even I

00:51:13.880 might vote

00:51:14.300 for him

00:51:14.720 that's

00:51:19.020 saying a lot

00:51:19.540 I might

00:51:21.000 even register

00:51:21.600 to vote

00:51:22.140 it's not

00:51:25.120 because I

00:51:25.520 agree with

00:51:26.040 him or

00:51:26.280 anything

00:51:26.480 it's just

00:51:27.400 that if

00:51:28.180 you're putting

00:51:28.480 Steve Bannon

00:51:29.140 in jail

00:51:29.660 because of

00:51:30.960 your kangaroo

00:51:31.600 court

00:51:32.060 he might

00:51:34.360 come out

00:51:34.720 as Jesus

00:51:35.220 that's all

00:51:35.760 I'm saying

00:51:36.160 he might

00:51:37.060 get elected

00:51:37.460 president

00:51:37.940 the day

00:51:38.720 he gets

00:51:39.000 out

00:51:39.260 anyway

00:51:40.860 that's all

00:51:41.360 for now

00:51:41.680 I'll talk

00:51:42.060 to you

00:51:42.260 later

00:51:42.500 bye

00:51:43.560 YouTube

00:51:43.880 I'll talk

00:51:59.560 about

00:52:00.680 you

00:52:01.100 you

00:52:01.700 you

00:52:02.640 you

00:52:06.400 you

00:52:06.920 you

00:52:07.360 you

00:52:07.680 you

00:52:08.900 you

00:52:10.780 you

00:52:11.880 you

00:52:12.880 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 21, 2022

Episode 1903 Scott Adams： I'm Grumpy This Morning. This Will Not Go Well

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript