Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1903 Scott Adams： I'm Grumpy This Morning. This Will Not Go Well

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the grumpy version of Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:09.800 Normally, my cheery optimism is impossible to turn off, but today, I warn you, I'm grumpy,

00:00:16.860 and I don't know where the fuck this is going to go this morning, because I don't have any filters today.

00:00:23.400 Do you ever wake up and have no filter? I would fucking kill somebody today.

00:00:30.000 Like, today's the kind of day, no joke, I wish for a home invasion, because a fight to the death would be exactly what I'm up for right now.

00:00:41.000 Like, actually, you know, somebody comes into your home to do violence to you, and somehow you get the upper hand.

00:00:49.140 Today's the day I would finish them off. Like, if I got them on the ground, there's no way I'd let them leave the house alive.

00:00:56.060 So that's the kind of day I'm having.

00:01:01.420 So if you'd like to join me, all you need is a cupper mug or a glass, a tanker, chalicers, and a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:01:12.240 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:14.800 I like coffee, and I wish I had some in my cup, but my fucking coffee machine doesn't work this morning.

00:01:21.540 So I'm going to fake drink from a cup that doesn't have any fucking coffee in it.

00:01:27.300 Did I mention I'm grumpy this morning?

00:01:33.000 Go.

00:01:37.580 Yeah, if that had been coffee, that would have been amazing.

00:01:40.100 I'm sure all of you are enjoying your morning.

00:01:44.600 Yeah, I got two coffee makers, and they're both fucked up right now.

00:01:48.280 Let's talk about...

00:01:51.560 How did this happen?

00:02:01.320 Somehow I printed out yesterday's notes,

00:02:04.600 which is weird because they don't exist.

00:02:14.400 So I don't know how that happened.

00:02:16.600 I deleted all of my notes from yesterday

00:02:18.920 and then printed out the...

00:02:21.080 because I use the same documents, the same document.

00:02:23.420 How is it possible that I spent all morning writing in a blank document,

00:02:28.600 and then when I printed that document, it was yesterday's notes?

00:02:33.140 I'm not entirely sure, but while you're there,

00:02:40.000 I'm going to check and see if I put those in the wrong hole.

00:02:43.740 That is the weirdest thing.

00:02:45.980 So to say that everything's not working this morning would be an understatement.

00:02:52.540 Well, I'll be damned.

00:02:56.800 Oh, I see what I did.

00:02:58.020 Yep, I did the one thing.

00:03:02.340 I tell myself, whatever you do...

00:03:04.880 I've got two files that I use in the morning.

00:03:09.940 One of them, I have a rule, which is,

00:03:12.340 whatever you do, do not edit this file.

00:03:16.440 This file can never change,

00:03:18.080 because it's the one I need right before I go live.

00:03:19.900 It's the one that has the link for the YouTube.

00:03:23.580 So there's one that I can never, ever change,

00:03:25.840 and then there's one I change every day.

00:03:29.440 I did it the other way around this morning.

00:03:32.020 So it's like the one thing you're not supposed to do.

00:03:34.220 But I got my notes.

00:03:36.280 All right.

00:03:38.740 I'd be surprised if anybody's still watching this disaster of a live stream.

00:03:44.120 Rename the file.

00:03:47.680 No, that wouldn't help.

00:03:49.120 Did I mention I didn't have a coffee this morning?

00:03:51.240 Nothing would have helped me this morning.

00:03:55.620 David Sachs, as you know,

00:03:57.000 he's made his suggestion for how to settle the Ukraine situation

00:04:01.580 and got a lot of criticism.

00:04:04.420 And so based on that criticism,

00:04:06.400 David Sachs tweets today,

00:04:08.340 I'm willing to listen to experts,

00:04:10.440 just not the experts who got us into Iraq, Afghanistan,

00:04:13.520 Syria, and Libya.

00:04:16.460 You left out Ukraine.

00:04:18.460 The other people you shouldn't listen to

00:04:20.380 are the people who got you into Ukraine.

00:04:23.920 Yeah, those are the other people you shouldn't listen to.

00:04:26.960 Let me ask you something.

00:04:29.300 Is there anybody who watches this live stream

00:04:31.660 who still thinks that you should listen to the experts?

00:04:38.980 Like, does that even sound like a criticism that works in 2022?

00:04:43.520 If somebody tells you,

00:04:47.240 hey, why don't you listen to the experts?

00:04:50.380 You know what the best response to that is?

00:04:55.980 This is 2022.

00:04:58.900 Where have you been for the last two years?

00:05:01.760 Listening to the experts has caused every fucking problem we have.

00:05:05.980 All of them.

00:05:06.620 They're all the problems of the experts.

00:05:14.400 Laura Logan got kicked off on Newsmax, I guess.

00:05:20.740 Anybody follow that story?

00:05:22.280 So, Laura Logan went, I guess, full replacement theory,

00:05:29.840 and she believed...

00:05:33.280 This is the part that just blows my mind.

00:05:35.820 So, she said on Newsmax,

00:05:37.360 and by the way,

00:05:38.300 I'm just reporting what she said

00:05:39.980 before she was kicked off on Newsmax.

00:05:42.000 So, I'm not telling you my opinion on these topics.

00:05:45.080 But apparently she said

00:05:47.560 that she talked to somebody

00:05:48.700 who had infiltrated, I don't know,

00:05:50.940 the UN or something,

00:05:52.620 and he held in his hand a document

00:05:54.700 that proved that there was a big plan

00:05:57.620 to replace the democracies

00:06:01.340 by bringing in lots of immigrants

00:06:03.680 and then they would help change the world in some way.

00:06:08.140 And that's, I guess,

00:06:10.260 it's racist and blood libel

00:06:11.860 and there's all kinds of stuff

00:06:13.040 wrapped into that stuff.

00:06:15.040 But here's the part.

00:06:17.340 What she said was

00:06:18.460 she talked to a guy

00:06:19.460 who claimed he held in his hand

00:06:21.040 the document that proved

00:06:22.220 what he said was true.

00:06:24.300 Isn't there something missing in that story?

00:06:27.060 All right, all right.

00:06:28.200 So, you talked to a guy

00:06:29.120 who held in his hand,

00:06:30.720 it was right in his hand,

00:06:31.660 the proof he needed it.

00:06:32.660 Right there, there's the guy,

00:06:34.500 there's his hand.

00:06:36.000 Was there any point, Laura,

00:06:38.080 where you said,

00:06:38.940 could you maybe hand that thing

00:06:42.060 in your hand over to one of my hands

00:06:44.940 and then I would have that in my hand

00:06:47.360 and then I would open it

00:06:48.640 and then look at it with my eyes

00:06:50.600 and then I would see

00:06:52.200 if that looked real or not.

00:06:54.440 But no, her story is

00:06:56.120 that she talked to a guy

00:06:57.200 who says he had it in his hand.

00:06:59.380 And if that's not proof,

00:07:01.200 I don't know what is.

00:07:02.660 So, I don't care what else she said

00:07:04.980 that got her bumped off of Newsmax,

00:07:07.320 I think I would have fired her

00:07:09.080 just for saying that a guy

00:07:10.260 had proof in his hands.

00:07:13.520 He's got proof in his hands.

00:07:14.960 Well, that's good.

00:07:16.740 That's good.

00:07:19.660 Do you know that

00:07:20.760 there's now proof that UFOs are real?

00:07:25.560 Yeah, there's proof.

00:07:27.020 A lot of people are speculating

00:07:28.180 that UFOs are not real,

00:07:29.500 but I've got the proof in my hand.

00:07:33.660 It's right here.

00:07:36.120 Right here.

00:07:37.240 Oh, you'd like to see it?

00:07:39.720 Sorry.

00:07:40.880 It doesn't work that way.

00:07:42.700 Proof's in my hand.

00:07:44.160 Right there.

00:07:44.760 So, I feel like there's something

00:07:48.560 left at the end of that story.

00:07:53.080 I am quite amused

00:07:54.520 as I watch the Democrats

00:07:56.280 try to explain

00:07:57.320 why things are really going well

00:07:59.060 or why Biden should remain

00:08:02.200 president for longer than four years.

00:08:04.960 and the best job

00:08:07.580 of this I've seen

00:08:08.700 was actually hilarious

00:08:10.280 because, you know,

00:08:12.140 the argument for the Democrat side

00:08:13.960 is kind of disappearing.

00:08:16.480 So, this is what Chris Hayes said

00:08:19.160 as the reason...

00:08:23.660 So, he's explaining

00:08:25.580 why it made sense

00:08:26.780 for Biden to release the gas...

00:08:29.920 Not the gas.

00:08:31.280 To release the oil

00:08:32.180 from the National Reserve.

00:08:34.960 And he explains

00:08:36.640 that the reason

00:08:37.480 why that's okay

00:08:38.460 and that even though

00:08:40.600 it's purely political

00:08:41.660 is purely political

00:08:44.140 in a good way

00:08:45.040 because it prevents fascists

00:08:47.040 from taking over.

00:08:49.780 So, using up

00:08:51.080 our emergency reserve

00:08:52.620 at the same time

00:08:54.940 we're giving up

00:08:55.560 our weapons.

00:08:56.800 I guess we're

00:08:57.520 giving away our weapons.

00:08:59.820 And we're giving away

00:09:00.500 our National Reserve.

00:09:01.940 But that's okay

00:09:02.860 because if this

00:09:04.580 lowers gas prices

00:09:05.860 and it allows

00:09:06.420 Biden to win...

00:09:08.580 Well, I'll just read you

00:09:09.440 Chris Hayes' argument.

00:09:10.420 He goes, quote,

00:09:11.040 We find ourselves

00:09:12.040 in a situation

00:09:12.660 where keeping gas prices low

00:09:14.600 is key to preserving

00:09:16.440 and strengthening

00:09:17.140 the future of our democracy.

00:09:19.460 And so, here we are.

00:09:21.380 Hence, Biden releasing oil

00:09:23.040 from the reserves today.

00:09:25.340 So that...

00:09:25.900 Releasing our oil

00:09:27.780 so that Biden gets re-elected

00:09:30.560 is justified

00:09:33.740 because the main thing

00:09:35.300 is that Biden

00:09:35.880 gets re-elected

00:09:36.900 and we keep these...

00:09:38.240 We keep these risks

00:09:40.900 to our democracy

00:09:42.060 and to the White House.

00:09:45.060 I've got to say,

00:09:46.920 one of the things

00:09:47.580 I always say about lawyers

00:09:48.720 is you always have to listen

00:09:51.000 for the other side's argument

00:09:52.380 because lawyers are really good

00:09:54.060 at making an argument

00:09:55.560 out of nothing.

00:09:56.240 And this is pretty good.

00:10:00.140 It's pretty...

00:10:00.540 I mean, it's completely

00:10:01.500 unpersuasive, of course.

00:10:03.360 But he had nothing

00:10:04.800 to work with.

00:10:06.460 Imagine being

00:10:07.360 on the Democrat side

00:10:08.500 and you're a pundit.

00:10:09.700 He had nothing to work with.

00:10:11.360 But he still...

00:10:12.100 He still built

00:10:13.140 a little structure

00:10:13.940 that makes sense

00:10:14.780 in its own way.

00:10:16.500 Yes, it does make sense

00:10:17.840 that the only way

00:10:19.480 to preserve democracy

00:10:20.680 is releasing that oil.

00:10:22.420 And it actually tracks.

00:10:25.040 Like, one does connect

00:10:26.220 to the other point.

00:10:28.720 It's kind of...

00:10:30.800 I was impressed.

00:10:33.760 It's not a good point,

00:10:35.980 but given what he had

00:10:36.980 to work with,

00:10:38.260 it was quite an effort.

00:10:40.180 I don't know.

00:10:41.520 I have to applaud that.

00:10:44.400 The Blaze has...

00:10:46.120 They're setting new records here.

00:10:48.460 They got two fake newses

00:10:51.480 in one tweet.

00:10:53.460 All right?

00:10:54.200 So here's what they say.

00:10:56.040 They say,

00:10:56.720 Bill Gates says

00:10:57.760 a Russian invasion of Ukraine

00:10:59.360 will be, quote,

00:11:00.620 good for the long run

00:11:01.840 because it will force countries

00:11:03.580 to transition to green energy.

00:11:05.720 Praises ESG investment.

00:11:09.060 Both of those are fake news.

00:11:11.360 Fake news.

00:11:12.520 Here's why.

00:11:14.660 Bill Gates...

00:11:15.580 Let's do the first part.

00:11:16.640 Bill Gates says

00:11:17.240 the Russian invasion of Ukraine

00:11:18.300 will be, quote,

00:11:19.460 good for the long run.

00:11:21.300 Take it out of context.

00:11:24.700 I say exactly the same thing.

00:11:28.860 Has anybody criticized me

00:11:30.240 for saying it?

00:11:32.380 How often do I say

00:11:33.760 nobody wants a war,

00:11:35.560 but it's nonetheless true

00:11:37.340 that wars spur innovation?

00:11:40.100 Does that sound like

00:11:41.180 I love me some war?

00:11:43.980 Mmm, love war

00:11:45.200 because of all the good points,

00:11:47.220 the innovation that comes out of it.

00:11:49.280 So does it look like

00:11:50.260 I'm in favor of war

00:11:51.380 because the innovations

00:11:54.440 are worth having?

00:11:56.400 No.

00:11:58.680 So when Bill Gates says

00:12:00.340 that the Russian invasion

00:12:04.100 of Ukraine

00:12:04.680 will be good for the long run,

00:12:06.880 what he's specifically

00:12:07.900 talking about

00:12:08.720 is energy sources

00:12:10.340 that don't bind us

00:12:11.720 to other countries

00:12:13.280 and they're good

00:12:14.660 for the environment

00:12:15.340 and everything else.

00:12:16.920 Now remember,

00:12:18.220 Bill Gates is heavily invested

00:12:19.580 in nuclear energy.

00:12:21.800 So when Bill Gates says

00:12:22.960 it's good for the long run,

00:12:25.040 he is including

00:12:25.960 it's good for the

00:12:27.380 nuclear energy business,

00:12:29.220 which most of you

00:12:30.100 would agree is a good thing.

00:12:32.060 Now, do you think

00:12:33.180 it's a bad thing

00:12:34.000 that Germany is turning

00:12:34.940 its nuclear power plants

00:12:36.340 back on?

00:12:39.000 Don't we all think

00:12:39.900 that's a good thing?

00:12:40.580 So here's the blaze

00:12:42.520 acting like he's

00:12:43.420 some kind of fucking vampire

00:12:44.700 who's happy about

00:12:46.820 the Ukraine war

00:12:49.280 because it's good

00:12:50.040 for his green investments.

00:12:51.740 Nothing the fuck

00:12:52.780 like that happened.

00:12:54.460 This was Bill Gates

00:12:55.360 saying exactly what I say

00:12:56.940 all the time,

00:12:57.960 which is nobody wants

00:12:59.180 this bad thing to happen,

00:13:00.780 but it is nonetheless

00:13:01.900 the case

00:13:03.840 that bad things

00:13:05.360 cause you to innovate

00:13:06.640 and sometimes

00:13:07.400 the innovations are good.

00:13:08.380 Where is the problem

00:13:11.220 with that, really?

00:13:13.400 Does anybody have a problem

00:13:14.740 with the fact that

00:13:15.880 wars spur innovation?

00:13:18.460 It's just a statement of fact.

00:13:21.740 How about the second part?

00:13:22.760 He praises ESG investments.

00:13:25.400 Completely false.

00:13:27.100 He's on record for saying

00:13:28.400 that the reporting requirements

00:13:29.940 of ESG are crazy

00:13:31.380 because we don't have

00:13:33.960 a second way

00:13:34.540 to make steel.

00:13:36.180 Steel is just going to be

00:13:37.740 energy intensive

00:13:40.200 and bad for the environment

00:13:42.000 or you don't make steel.

00:13:43.540 Nobody has another way

00:13:44.440 to do it.

00:13:45.920 So when Bill Gates

00:13:47.600 praises ESG investment,

00:13:50.540 he's not saying

00:13:52.200 the reporting part,

00:13:53.320 which is really the ESG.

00:13:54.620 He's saying the concept.

00:13:56.500 The concept of ESG

00:13:58.040 is fine.

00:13:59.200 Who's against

00:13:59.860 a healthier environment?

00:14:02.160 The concept is fine.

00:14:04.540 And again,

00:14:05.360 he's for nuclear energy

00:14:06.920 and nuclear energy

00:14:08.260 would be great

00:14:08.840 for the environment.

00:14:11.100 So this is just

00:14:13.340 two fake newses

00:14:14.140 from the blaze.

00:14:16.240 I hate that I have

00:14:17.480 to be in a position of

00:14:18.460 it looks like I'm

00:14:19.180 defending Bill Gates,

00:14:20.500 but I'm not

00:14:21.480 because he can

00:14:22.220 defend himself.

00:14:23.900 I'm simply saying

00:14:25.160 that the news is fake.

00:14:26.360 That's not defending him.

00:14:27.500 Do you know

00:14:35.680 Seth Abramson?

00:14:37.780 So he's a notable

00:14:39.580 Democrat activist,

00:14:42.420 operative,

00:14:43.840 bundet,

00:14:44.500 I don't know.

00:14:45.660 He's an active voice

00:14:47.020 in the Democrat Party.

00:14:48.800 And he says

00:14:49.880 that the news media,

00:14:51.320 at least the TV news media,

00:14:52.760 has gone right wing.

00:14:55.080 Is that what you see?

00:14:58.120 Do you see the media

00:14:58.840 has gone right wing?

00:15:03.260 And here's his argument.

00:15:06.000 Isn't it amazing

00:15:06.740 that you live

00:15:07.340 in the same world

00:15:08.260 with Seth Abramson

00:15:11.940 and that his view

00:15:13.980 of what is happening

00:15:14.920 in the real world

00:15:15.780 is just completely opposite

00:15:17.340 of what I think

00:15:19.060 most of you

00:15:19.640 or all of you see?

00:15:20.480 So his argument

00:15:21.960 that the TV news

00:15:23.660 is drifting right

00:15:24.660 is that Newsmax

00:15:27.780 and what is it,

00:15:29.940 One Network,

00:15:31.160 whatever it is,

00:15:31.980 so there have been

00:15:32.520 some new media

00:15:33.440 that have come

00:15:35.000 into being

00:15:35.720 that lean right.

00:15:38.400 So OAN,

00:15:39.220 yes, OAN.

00:15:40.100 So he's using

00:15:40.860 Newsmax and OAN

00:15:41.980 CNN as being

00:15:42.900 more recent networks

00:15:44.620 as evidence

00:15:45.380 of the move

00:15:46.620 to the right.

00:15:47.400 And then he also

00:15:48.340 lists CNN.

00:15:50.080 He goes,

00:15:50.460 CNN's moving

00:15:51.200 to the right.

00:15:52.960 Is CNN moving

00:15:53.820 to the right?

00:15:57.380 Apparently the middle

00:15:58.400 is the right now.

00:16:00.480 Has anybody seen CNN

00:16:01.960 do anything

00:16:02.760 that looked like

00:16:03.420 a move to the right?

00:16:04.800 I mean,

00:16:05.140 it's right from

00:16:06.000 where they were

00:16:06.680 for sure.

00:16:08.320 But I think

00:16:09.640 that they were targeted

00:16:10.540 directly at the middle

00:16:11.640 and they're pretty

00:16:13.940 close to the middle,

00:16:14.880 actually.

00:16:16.760 If you've watched

00:16:17.640 CNN lately,

00:16:19.700 they're much closer

00:16:20.560 to the middle,

00:16:21.080 wouldn't you say?

00:16:22.240 I don't know if they're,

00:16:23.000 you know,

00:16:23.320 you could quibble

00:16:25.300 about specifics,

00:16:26.660 but I'd say

00:16:27.760 they're closer

00:16:28.220 to the middle.

00:16:30.600 So,

00:16:31.920 and I think

00:16:32.780 they're a little bit

00:16:33.520 more watchable, too.

00:16:35.680 So I think

00:16:36.300 it's working.

00:16:37.860 You know,

00:16:38.100 I don't know

00:16:38.440 if it's,

00:16:39.180 it works for me,

00:16:39.980 I don't know

00:16:40.200 if it works

00:16:40.580 for their numbers.

00:16:42.440 But it's kind

00:16:43.160 of amazing

00:16:43.600 to live in a world

00:16:44.800 and know that

00:16:45.260 there's somebody

00:16:45.760 who would say

00:16:46.280 that perspective

00:16:47.920 in public

00:16:51.340 like we can all

00:16:53.440 see it.

00:16:54.720 Isn't that weird?

00:16:56.620 When you say

00:16:57.300 something like this

00:16:58.020 in public,

00:16:58.720 what you're saying

00:16:59.400 is,

00:16:59.720 well,

00:16:59.800 you can all

00:17:00.280 see this,

00:17:00.820 too.

00:17:01.360 I'm just,

00:17:01.960 you know,

00:17:02.240 describing what you see.

00:17:04.000 I'll say that.

00:17:05.760 All right.

00:17:06.120 The best

00:17:08.600 Halloween costume

00:17:09.760 I've seen,

00:17:11.140 just so I go by

00:17:12.180 on Twitter,

00:17:13.640 I'll describe it

00:17:14.800 so that you can

00:17:15.700 do it, too.

00:17:16.580 So I think

00:17:17.400 you can buy

00:17:18.020 Joe Biden

00:17:19.460 masks.

00:17:20.280 You can usually

00:17:20.840 buy a mask

00:17:22.040 of the president,

00:17:22.740 right?

00:17:23.240 So you get a

00:17:23.940 Joe Biden mask

00:17:24.780 and then you get

00:17:25.940 a little fake

00:17:27.520 skull or something

00:17:28.380 and you put the

00:17:29.000 mask on whatever

00:17:29.900 it is that's

00:17:30.420 like a head.

00:17:30.940 and then you

00:17:32.240 have your

00:17:34.720 young daughter

00:17:35.500 stick it in

00:17:37.820 the side of

00:17:38.740 her shirt

00:17:40.500 so it looks

00:17:42.040 like Joe Biden

00:17:42.760 is sniffing

00:17:43.320 her hair.

00:17:46.400 That's the

00:17:47.080 whole costume.

00:17:48.320 It's pretty

00:17:48.740 good.

00:17:54.080 All right.

00:17:55.340 So how many

00:17:56.260 of you are

00:17:56.740 watching on

00:17:58.100 right-leaning

00:17:59.060 media?

00:17:59.500 Dr.

00:18:00.060 Rasim

00:18:00.720 Malhotra

00:18:02.040 who is a

00:18:03.960 cardiologist

00:18:05.680 and

00:18:06.840 consultant

00:18:08.620 cardiologist

00:18:10.160 I think

00:18:10.500 and

00:18:11.840 he believes

00:18:13.220 he's looked

00:18:13.740 at the data

00:18:14.380 the Pfizer

00:18:16.080 data in

00:18:16.580 particular

00:18:16.940 and thinks

00:18:18.160 that there's

00:18:18.720 enough

00:18:19.080 bad

00:18:20.200 indications

00:18:21.420 in the

00:18:22.120 known data

00:18:22.920 you know

00:18:23.540 in the

00:18:24.260 known data

00:18:25.160 that

00:18:26.220 the

00:18:26.960 vaccination

00:18:27.940 should be

00:18:28.480 pulled.

00:18:30.060 now

00:18:30.780 I watch

00:18:34.020 this

00:18:34.320 and I

00:18:34.600 say to

00:18:34.860 myself

00:18:35.240 wow

00:18:35.680 he's

00:18:36.620 looking

00:18:36.920 at

00:18:37.100 information

00:18:37.580 that is

00:18:38.060 available

00:18:38.420 to the

00:18:39.420 public

00:18:39.800 my

00:18:41.400 understanding

00:18:41.940 is right

00:18:42.360 so he's

00:18:43.340 looking at

00:18:43.660 information

00:18:44.080 we can

00:18:44.440 all look

00:18:44.800 at so

00:18:45.220 all

00:18:45.520 cardiologists

00:18:46.280 can look

00:18:46.680 at the

00:18:46.960 same

00:18:47.140 stuff

00:18:47.580 look

00:18:51.980 Holling

00:18:52.700 I'm

00:18:52.900 just

00:18:53.060 going

00:18:53.200 to

00:18:53.360 fuck

00:18:54.240 off

00:18:54.560 just

00:18:54.980 fuck

00:18:55.260 off

00:18:55.540 you're

00:18:56.200 already

00:18:56.440 starting

00:18:56.900 like

00:18:57.740 what is

00:18:58.400 your

00:18:58.540 point

00:18:58.940 are you

00:18:59.640 just

00:18:59.800 trying

00:19:00.000 to be

00:19:00.280 an

00:19:00.420 asshole

00:19:00.760 let me

00:19:02.700 even

00:19:02.900 remove

00:19:03.540 put user

00:19:04.520 in time

00:19:04.900 out

00:19:05.100 let me

00:19:06.560 even

00:19:06.740 finish

00:19:07.080 the

00:19:07.280 fucking

00:19:07.580 point

00:19:08.020 okay

00:19:08.580 I warned

00:19:11.620 you I'm

00:19:11.840 grumpy

00:19:12.120 today

00:19:12.420 so don't

00:19:12.840 get on

00:19:13.140 me

00:19:13.800 so here's

00:19:16.020 my

00:19:16.180 question

00:19:16.560 it's

00:19:18.260 a

00:19:18.580 doctor

00:19:20.740 with

00:19:21.020 credentials

00:19:21.580 who's

00:19:22.960 pointing

00:19:23.260 to

00:19:23.620 public

00:19:24.180 information

00:19:24.840 and he's

00:19:26.680 looking right

00:19:27.180 at it

00:19:27.640 and saying

00:19:28.260 look at

00:19:28.780 this

00:19:28.980 public

00:19:29.320 information

00:19:29.940 hey

00:19:30.860 everybody

00:19:31.240 look at

00:19:31.660 this

00:19:31.980 this would

00:19:33.240 tell you

00:19:33.740 that

00:19:34.060 the medical

00:19:35.500 advice

00:19:36.020 you're

00:19:36.260 getting

00:19:36.500 is all

00:19:36.900 wrong

00:19:37.220 where are

00:19:39.320 the other

00:19:40.280 people

00:19:40.700 who say

00:19:42.440 yeah I

00:19:42.860 looked at

00:19:43.280 exactly what

00:19:43.940 he looked

00:19:44.320 at

00:19:44.560 yeah he's

00:19:45.140 right

00:19:45.400 where are

00:19:46.620 those

00:19:46.820 people

00:19:47.100 is it

00:19:49.140 really

00:19:49.540 true

00:19:50.000 that

00:19:51.600 we can't

00:19:52.700 get more

00:19:53.160 of these

00:19:53.540 people

00:19:53.900 is he

00:19:55.460 the

00:19:55.740 like the

00:19:56.700 one

00:19:57.600 brave

00:19:57.980 one

00:19:58.240 because

00:20:01.040 he's

00:20:01.320 pointing to

00:20:02.140 something

00:20:02.420 very

00:20:02.720 specific

00:20:03.260 he's not

00:20:03.840 saying

00:20:04.160 look at

00:20:04.620 everything

00:20:05.080 right

00:20:06.120 he's

00:20:06.800 looking at

00:20:07.260 either a

00:20:08.140 study or

00:20:08.720 specific

00:20:09.240 information

00:20:10.260 can't we

00:20:11.440 all look

00:20:11.800 at that

00:20:12.180 now if

00:20:12.660 I looked

00:20:13.020 at it

00:20:13.340 it wouldn't

00:20:13.680 help

00:20:14.020 because I'm

00:20:15.040 not an

00:20:15.380 expert

00:20:15.680 not a

00:20:16.180 doctor

00:20:16.440 but can't

00:20:17.420 the other

00:20:17.720 doctors look

00:20:18.420 at exactly

00:20:19.300 what he's

00:20:19.840 looking at

00:20:20.400 and at

00:20:21.180 least tell

00:20:21.720 you yes

00:20:23.100 he's

00:20:23.400 interpreting

00:20:23.840 this

00:20:24.140 correctly

00:20:24.600 or no

00:20:27.020 he's

00:20:27.660 incorrectly

00:20:28.560 interpreting

00:20:29.260 it

00:20:29.600 they don't

00:20:31.100 even need

00:20:31.540 to have

00:20:32.940 an opinion

00:20:33.320 do they

00:20:33.720 I feel

00:20:35.280 as if

00:20:35.720 here's

00:20:37.000 what

00:20:37.240 is missing

00:20:37.900 so as

00:20:41.300 useful

00:20:41.700 as it

00:20:42.200 is to

00:20:42.740 see

00:20:43.300 rogue

00:20:44.800 opinions

00:20:45.340 or ones

00:20:45.820 that

00:20:46.040 disagree

00:20:46.520 with the

00:20:46.840 mainstream

00:20:47.160 it

00:20:48.160 doesn't

00:20:48.740 help me

00:20:49.380 unless

00:20:50.000 it's

00:20:50.520 paired

00:20:50.780 with a

00:20:51.160 counter

00:20:51.460 argument

00:20:52.140 you tell

00:20:54.980 me you

00:20:55.300 can't get

00:20:55.740 anybody

00:20:56.140 from

00:20:56.500 Pfizer

00:20:56.920 to be

00:20:58.380 on a

00:20:58.660 show

00:20:58.840 with that

00:20:59.200 guy

00:20:59.500 at all

00:21:01.300 there's

00:21:01.880 nobody

00:21:02.120 from

00:21:02.400 Pfizer

00:21:02.780 there's

00:21:03.700 no

00:21:04.080 top

00:21:04.560 doctor

00:21:05.040 who's

00:21:05.700 also

00:21:06.000 looked at

00:21:06.400 the same

00:21:06.740 information

00:21:07.260 and is

00:21:08.080 on the

00:21:08.320 other

00:21:08.460 side

00:21:08.860 you can't

00:21:09.800 get him

00:21:10.040 on to

00:21:10.600 say

00:21:10.900 no that

00:21:11.380 guy

00:21:11.560 looked at

00:21:11.960 the wrong

00:21:12.320 thing

00:21:12.740 or he

00:21:13.620 interpreted

00:21:14.060 it wrong

00:21:14.540 we are

00:21:18.780 being so

00:21:19.340 fucked over

00:21:20.140 by the

00:21:20.880 news

00:21:21.240 both left

00:21:22.560 and right

00:21:23.020 so I'm

00:21:23.920 going to

00:21:24.100 include

00:21:24.400 Fox News

00:21:25.060 in the

00:21:25.380 bad

00:21:25.600 category

00:21:26.020 here

00:21:26.380 so I

00:21:28.800 watched

00:21:29.040 Laura

00:21:29.420 Ingram's

00:21:29.900 show

00:21:30.140 and she

00:21:30.420 had

00:21:30.640 this

00:21:31.240 doctor

00:21:31.600 on

00:21:31.940 but

00:21:33.140 if she

00:21:33.720 doesn't

00:21:34.080 ever

00:21:34.340 have a

00:21:34.700 doctor

00:21:34.980 on

00:21:35.240 who

00:21:35.400 disagrees

00:21:36.100 with

00:21:36.360 this

00:21:36.540 doctor

00:21:36.880 has

00:21:37.140 she

00:21:37.260 done

00:21:37.460 a

00:21:37.580 good

00:21:37.720 service

00:21:38.180 let me

00:21:40.660 ask

00:21:40.840 that

00:21:41.080 I hate

00:21:43.080 to make

00:21:43.320 this

00:21:43.500 personal

00:21:43.900 because I

00:21:44.460 like

00:21:45.120 Laura

00:21:45.360 Ingram

00:21:45.680 but

00:21:46.700 is that

00:21:48.860 a good

00:21:49.180 service

00:21:49.580 to us

00:21:50.040 to put

00:21:50.360 one

00:21:50.600 doctor

00:21:50.940 on

00:21:51.240 when

00:21:52.300 most

00:21:52.720 of the

00:21:53.040 medical

00:21:53.320 community

00:21:53.860 is on

00:21:55.400 the other

00:21:55.700 side

00:21:56.060 we think

00:21:57.620 we haven't

00:21:58.280 heard from

00:21:58.700 them so

00:21:59.060 maybe not

00:21:59.740 I don't

00:22:01.460 know

00:22:01.660 I don't

00:22:02.700 feel like

00:22:03.080 that moved

00:22:03.520 the ball

00:22:03.880 forward

00:22:04.320 I think

00:22:04.700 it was

00:22:07.260 provocative

00:22:07.840 and maybe

00:22:09.480 there's

00:22:10.940 value

00:22:11.300 for the

00:22:11.700 first

00:22:11.940 red

00:22:12.200 flag

00:22:12.580 right

00:22:12.900 there's

00:22:14.240 value

00:22:14.580 to

00:22:14.900 raise

00:22:15.460 alarms

00:22:15.880 when

00:22:16.220 somebody

00:22:16.620 qualified

00:22:17.680 as

00:22:17.900 raising

00:22:18.200 alarm

00:22:18.580 but

00:22:19.500 if

00:22:19.780 it

00:22:19.900 just

00:22:20.100 ends

00:22:20.520 there

00:22:20.880 what

00:22:22.080 service

00:22:22.660 has

00:22:22.860 been

00:22:23.020 done

00:22:23.240 to

00:22:23.420 the

00:22:23.600 viewing

00:22:24.440 public

00:22:24.960 I

00:22:26.220 think

00:22:26.440 Laura

00:22:26.760 Ingram

00:22:27.120 absolutely

00:22:27.860 needs

00:22:28.340 to get

00:22:28.680 somebody

00:22:29.200 on there

00:22:29.700 to say

00:22:30.080 that guy

00:22:30.540 is wrong

00:22:31.040 and why

00:22:31.940 now it'd

00:22:33.420 be nice

00:22:33.740 to have

00:22:33.960 them on

00:22:34.260 at the

00:22:34.520 same

00:22:34.720 time

00:22:35.140 but

00:22:36.160 if

00:22:36.360 you

00:22:36.500 can't

00:22:36.780 get

00:22:36.920 somebody

00:22:37.240 on there

00:22:37.620 to give

00:22:38.020 the

00:22:38.180 counter

00:22:38.480 argument

00:22:38.960 should

00:22:41.900 you

00:22:42.060 trust

00:22:42.340 it

00:22:42.580 should

00:22:44.540 you

00:22:44.720 trust

00:22:45.080 anything

00:22:45.500 he

00:22:45.760 says

00:22:46.160 until

00:22:46.560 you've

00:22:46.920 seen

00:22:47.160 the

00:22:47.400 counter

00:22:47.720 argument

00:22:48.200 there

00:22:48.740 might

00:22:48.920 not

00:22:49.120 be

00:22:49.320 one

00:22:49.600 it

00:22:50.240 could

00:22:50.440 be

00:22:50.600 that

00:22:50.780 the

00:22:50.900 reason

00:22:51.120 you

00:22:51.260 don't

00:22:51.400 see

00:22:51.580 a

00:22:51.720 counter

00:22:51.960 argument

00:22:52.280 is

00:22:52.520 nobody

00:22:52.820 has

00:22:53.100 one

00:22:53.280 that

00:22:54.140 that's

00:22:54.240 entirely

00:22:54.600 possible

00:22:55.100 but

00:22:56.520 somebody

00:22:57.180 needs

00:22:57.420 to

00:22:57.580 tell

00:22:57.780 us

00:22:57.960 that

00:22:58.240 tell

00:22:59.760 us

00:23:00.080 tell

00:23:00.840 us

00:23:01.080 is

00:23:01.300 there

00:23:01.420 no

00:23:01.580 argument

00:23:01.920 there's

00:23:02.400 nobody

00:23:02.620 on the

00:23:02.880 other

00:23:03.040 side

00:23:03.340 because

00:23:04.260 it's

00:23:04.440 possible

00:23:04.780 there

00:23:04.960 isn't

00:23:06.180 maybe

00:23:06.620 anyway

00:23:09.120 you

00:23:09.580 are so

00:23:09.920 underserved

00:23:10.500 by your

00:23:10.860 news

00:23:11.180 and I

00:23:15.140 don't

00:23:15.260 have an

00:23:15.520 opinion

00:23:15.760 of whether

00:23:16.260 let me

00:23:16.880 give you

00:23:17.160 my

00:23:17.460 most

00:23:18.260 updated

00:23:18.840 we

00:23:21.220 don't

00:23:21.460 call them

00:23:21.800 vaccinations

00:23:22.380 anymore

00:23:22.820 right

00:23:23.020 my

00:23:23.260 updated

00:23:23.660 shot

00:23:24.100 opinion

00:23:24.500 what is

00:23:26.360 more

00:23:26.560 dangerous

00:23:27.100 the

00:23:27.500 vaccination

00:23:28.060 or

00:23:28.980 the

00:23:30.460 mRNA

00:23:31.360 shot

00:23:32.800 here's

00:23:33.940 my

00:23:34.120 current

00:23:34.420 opinion

00:23:34.800 you ready

00:23:35.240 don't

00:23:37.620 know

00:23:37.880 don't

00:23:39.260 know

00:23:39.480 I

00:23:41.220 can't

00:23:41.500 tell

00:23:41.760 let's

00:23:45.140 see

00:23:45.280 if

00:23:45.460 now

00:23:46.100 many

00:23:46.860 of you

00:23:47.120 think

00:23:47.440 that you

00:23:47.720 have a

00:23:47.960 pretty

00:23:48.160 strong

00:23:48.600 opinion

00:23:48.960 one

00:23:49.240 way

00:23:49.460 or

00:23:49.560 the

00:23:49.660 other

00:23:49.880 do

00:23:51.420 you

00:23:51.580 think

00:23:51.900 let me

00:23:52.380 ask

00:23:52.600 it this

00:23:52.900 way

00:23:53.120 do

00:23:53.840 you

00:23:53.920 think

00:23:54.120 anybody

00:23:54.520 should

00:23:54.820 have

00:23:54.940 a

00:23:55.080 strong

00:23:55.400 opinion

00:23:55.820 given

00:23:57.380 the

00:23:58.920 information

00:23:59.440 that's

00:23:59.740 available

00:24:00.160 should

00:24:01.200 you have

00:24:01.400 a

00:24:01.540 strong

00:24:01.860 opinion

00:24:02.240 well let

00:24:04.520 me put

00:24:04.800 it a

00:24:04.980 different way

00:24:05.200 a strong

00:24:05.620 opinion

00:24:05.920 about whether

00:24:06.500 it works

00:24:07.120 you could

00:24:08.240 have a

00:24:08.540 strong

00:24:08.780 opinion

00:24:09.120 about whether

00:24:09.580 you should

00:24:09.920 take it

00:24:10.440 that's

00:24:11.280 different

00:24:11.580 I'm not

00:24:12.640 saying

00:24:12.880 whether

00:24:13.080 you should

00:24:13.420 take it

00:24:14.100 that

00:24:14.480 that decision

00:24:15.260 can be

00:24:15.720 easier

00:24:16.120 but do

00:24:17.040 you have

00:24:17.160 a strong

00:24:17.580 opinion

00:24:17.880 about

00:24:18.180 whether

00:24:18.600 the claims

00:24:21.440 are relatively

00:24:22.660 accurate

00:24:23.320 that it

00:24:24.120 protects

00:24:25.040 you

00:24:25.340 you know

00:24:31.400 what's weird

00:24:31.840 is

00:24:32.120 I don't

00:24:32.720 even see

00:24:33.180 something

00:24:33.540 developing

00:24:34.280 in the

00:24:35.660 world

00:24:36.060 that would

00:24:36.800 help us

00:24:37.380 why

00:24:39.140 usually

00:24:39.760 you see

00:24:40.200 a solution

00:24:41.040 starts to

00:24:42.300 emerge

00:24:42.840 you know

00:24:43.100 whenever

00:24:43.320 there's a

00:24:43.800 problem

00:24:44.560 somebody's

00:24:45.500 usually working

00:24:46.060 on the solution

00:24:46.740 right away

00:24:47.240 because you

00:24:47.640 can make

00:24:47.920 money

00:24:48.140 from it

00:24:48.800 I don't

00:24:49.240 see anybody

00:24:49.720 working on

00:24:50.460 a solution

00:24:51.900 to the

00:24:52.300 question

00:24:52.620 of why

00:24:53.640 we the

00:24:54.080 public

00:24:54.460 can't even

00:24:55.360 determine

00:24:55.820 if the

00:24:56.280 experts

00:24:56.660 are lying

00:24:57.160 to us

00:24:57.640 or if

00:24:58.000 they're

00:24:58.100 on the

00:24:58.360 same

00:24:58.540 side

00:24:58.940 or even

00:25:00.140 if they

00:25:00.440 will talk

00:25:00.840 to each

00:25:01.160 other

00:25:01.380 and you

00:25:02.100 know

00:25:02.280 have a

00:25:02.760 conversation

00:25:03.280 we don't

00:25:04.800 get any

00:25:05.180 of that

00:25:05.600 so here's

00:25:07.380 my take

00:25:07.900 until you

00:25:09.060 see

00:25:09.500 debates

00:25:10.940 between

00:25:11.600 pro-vax

00:25:12.720 and anti-vax

00:25:13.680 people

00:25:14.000 on the

00:25:14.800 same

00:25:15.020 platform

00:25:15.520 until you

00:25:16.620 see that

00:25:16.980 you can't

00:25:17.400 know

00:25:17.540 anything

00:25:17.820 and I

00:25:19.200 don't

00:25:19.440 recommend

00:25:19.840 that you

00:25:20.840 assume

00:25:21.220 anything

00:25:22.000 that any

00:25:22.400 of them

00:25:22.620 that they

00:25:22.980 say is

00:25:23.300 true

00:25:23.540 how's that

00:25:26.840 opinion

00:25:27.160 would you

00:25:28.160 agree

00:25:28.520 that until

00:25:29.660 you see

00:25:30.160 both the

00:25:30.880 experts

00:25:31.380 that are

00:25:31.820 pro and

00:25:32.220 con

00:25:32.580 arguing

00:25:33.100 together

00:25:33.640 side by

00:25:34.120 side

00:25:34.480 until you

00:25:35.420 see that

00:25:35.900 everything

00:25:36.500 you know

00:25:36.940 about the

00:25:37.360 vaccination

00:25:37.860 is fuck

00:25:38.560 nothing

00:25:38.900 right

00:25:39.900 it's fuck

00:25:40.300 nothing

00:25:40.640 it's fuck

00:25:42.500 nothing

00:25:42.900 because we

00:25:44.260 don't live

00:25:44.680 in a world

00:25:45.080 where listening

00:25:45.580 to one side

00:25:46.340 has any

00:25:46.980 use

00:25:47.260 at all

00:25:47.600 no use

00:25:48.640 there's no

00:25:49.360 utility

00:25:49.920 to what

00:25:51.160 Laura

00:25:51.460 Ingram's

00:25:52.020 show gave

00:25:52.800 you in

00:25:53.280 terms of

00:25:53.640 deciding

00:25:54.060 it's always

00:25:55.060 good to

00:25:55.360 raise flags

00:25:56.000 so let me

00:25:57.720 acknowledge that

00:25:58.380 raising a

00:25:58.900 flag

00:25:59.340 that's always a

00:26:01.060 useful thing

00:26:01.560 to do

00:26:01.900 but it doesn't

00:26:02.820 give you an

00:26:03.120 answer

00:26:03.420 we're nowhere

00:26:05.200 near an

00:26:05.800 answer

00:26:06.120 and nobody's

00:26:07.440 working on it

00:26:08.080 let me say

00:26:09.240 this again

00:26:09.680 it's the

00:26:10.740 biggest question

00:26:11.760 in the whole

00:26:12.540 fucking country

00:26:13.680 right

00:26:14.860 nobody is

00:26:16.540 working on

00:26:17.740 the solution

00:26:18.320 which is

00:26:18.800 putting the

00:26:20.060 two experts

00:26:20.740 together or

00:26:21.540 more and

00:26:22.720 having them

00:26:23.180 talk at the

00:26:23.700 same time to

00:26:24.340 each other and

00:26:24.940 show their

00:26:25.340 show their

00:26:26.000 work

00:26:26.320 now am I

00:26:28.680 wrong that

00:26:29.220 that would be

00:26:29.900 the answer

00:26:30.500 that you know

00:26:32.980 we've got a

00:26:33.720 government who's

00:26:34.320 saying huh

00:26:35.200 I wonder where

00:26:36.340 we can't convince

00:26:37.320 people to take

00:26:38.040 the vaccination

00:26:38.660 I wonder why

00:26:40.420 well let me

00:26:41.720 tell you why

00:26:42.260 because the way

00:26:43.440 you explain it

00:26:44.360 to us is like

00:26:45.440 a liar

00:26:46.040 okay

00:26:47.460 if you explain

00:26:49.000 it to us

00:26:49.460 exactly the way

00:26:50.560 a liar

00:26:51.340 talks

00:26:52.700 we're not

00:26:53.600 going to

00:26:53.880 fucking believe

00:26:54.600 you

00:26:54.880 doesn't matter

00:26:56.080 if you're

00:26:56.440 right or

00:26:56.800 you're wrong

00:26:57.280 I don't care

00:26:58.360 what your

00:26:58.840 science is

00:26:59.660 if the way

00:27:00.580 you talk to

00:27:01.240 me is exactly

00:27:02.120 like liars

00:27:02.920 talk

00:27:03.420 well I'm not

00:27:04.800 going to

00:27:05.100 fucking believe

00:27:05.780 you

00:27:06.100 so you need

00:27:07.640 to fix that

00:27:08.540 do you know

00:27:09.580 how liars

00:27:10.180 don't talk

00:27:10.900 they show you

00:27:12.780 both of your

00:27:13.600 arguments

00:27:14.220 and they give

00:27:15.660 you plenty

00:27:16.100 of time

00:27:16.600 and maybe

00:27:17.540 they even

00:27:18.080 you know

00:27:18.580 come back

00:27:19.420 and say

00:27:19.720 well you know

00:27:20.520 we were wrong

00:27:20.980 about this

00:27:21.460 but we looked

00:27:22.020 into it

00:27:22.500 probably takes

00:27:23.640 at least

00:27:24.060 two or three

00:27:25.700 iterations

00:27:26.260 of the same

00:27:26.940 two experts

00:27:27.560 talking

00:27:28.020 before you

00:27:28.920 have anything

00:27:29.720 we are so

00:27:31.200 far from

00:27:31.840 anybody

00:27:32.180 even attempting

00:27:33.700 attempting

00:27:35.540 to solve

00:27:36.240 the problem

00:27:36.800 and I want

00:27:39.080 to say this

00:27:39.420 as clearly

00:27:39.820 as possible

00:27:40.320 I'm not

00:27:41.320 complaining

00:27:41.780 that the

00:27:42.200 problem

00:27:42.480 isn't

00:27:42.860 fucking

00:27:43.340 solved

00:27:43.980 the problem

00:27:44.880 of having

00:27:45.460 the two

00:27:45.780 experts

00:27:46.240 talk at

00:27:46.760 the same

00:27:47.020 time

00:27:47.280 I'm saying

00:27:48.280 nobody's

00:27:48.720 working on

00:27:49.200 it

00:27:49.400 and we

00:27:50.440 all know

00:27:50.840 what the

00:27:51.200 fucking

00:27:51.580 answer is

00:27:52.360 put the

00:27:53.200 experts on

00:27:54.000 at the

00:27:54.320 same

00:27:54.660 fucking

00:27:55.220 time

00:27:55.800 somebody

00:27:56.960 put them

00:27:58.540 on at

00:27:59.080 the same

00:27:59.660 fucking

00:28:00.280 time

00:28:01.020 if you

00:28:01.920 don't do

00:28:02.360 that

00:28:02.700 you're not

00:28:03.460 working for

00:28:03.920 the American

00:28:04.340 people

00:28:04.700 you're

00:28:05.000 working for

00:28:05.380 your

00:28:05.540 fucking

00:28:05.900 clicks

00:28:06.320 and your

00:28:06.700 paycheck

00:28:06.980 which is

00:28:07.920 fine

00:28:08.240 it's a

00:28:09.420 free market

00:28:09.860 you can

00:28:10.200 work for

00:28:10.520 your

00:28:10.660 clicks

00:28:10.940 and your

00:28:11.220 paycheck

00:28:11.540 but don't

00:28:12.400 fucking

00:28:12.860 pretend

00:28:13.220 you're

00:28:13.480 helping

00:28:13.720 us

00:28:14.120 because

00:28:14.680 you're

00:28:14.860 not

00:28:15.120 you're

00:28:15.380 making

00:28:15.560 it

00:28:15.740 worse

00:28:16.140 every

00:28:17.280 fucking

00:28:17.800 time

00:28:18.240 you put

00:28:18.940 one

00:28:19.340 expert

00:28:19.660 on

00:28:19.980 without

00:28:20.200 the

00:28:20.460 other

00:28:20.660 side

00:28:21.040 you're

00:28:21.640 making

00:28:21.940 it

00:28:22.160 fucking

00:28:22.580 worse

00:28:23.180 fucking

00:28:25.240 worse

00:28:25.800 here's

00:28:31.840 what we

00:28:32.120 need

00:28:32.380 we need

00:28:32.840 a

00:28:33.160 platform

00:28:33.840 where we

00:28:34.520 can

00:28:34.840 make

00:28:35.360 bets

00:28:35.880 on

00:28:36.320 whether

00:28:36.760 the

00:28:38.720 vaccinated

00:28:39.300 or the

00:28:39.820 unvaccinated

00:28:40.600 die the

00:28:42.180 most

00:28:42.480 over the

00:28:42.820 next year

00:28:43.300 or two

00:28:43.580 now I

00:28:44.920 don't know

00:28:45.220 if we

00:28:45.460 can collect

00:28:45.940 the

00:28:46.280 data on

00:28:47.260 that

00:28:47.520 but let's

00:28:48.580 make it

00:28:48.900 a betting

00:28:49.940 market

00:28:51.000 right

00:28:51.980 you want

00:28:52.900 to be so

00:28:53.360 sure that

00:28:53.880 you're

00:28:54.100 right

00:28:54.400 put your

00:28:55.600 money on

00:28:56.000 it

00:28:56.420 put your

00:28:57.480 money on

00:28:57.860 it

00:28:58.120 how many

00:28:58.760 of you

00:28:59.120 would bet

00:28:59.680 a thousand

00:29:00.340 dollars

00:29:00.860 the

00:29:01.680 vaccinations

00:29:02.320 are

00:29:02.940 more

00:29:03.720 bad

00:29:04.180 than

00:29:04.380 good

00:29:04.700 for

00:29:04.920 people

00:29:05.220 over

00:29:05.460 60

00:29:05.960 go

00:29:06.480 who

00:29:07.500 would

00:29:07.960 bet

00:29:08.100 a thousand

00:29:08.620 dollars

00:29:09.140 that the

00:29:11.380 vaccinated

00:29:11.960 people

00:29:12.380 over 60

00:29:13.140 are going

00:29:14.380 to die

00:29:14.720 at a

00:29:14.940 higher rate

00:29:15.380 than the

00:29:15.680 unvaccinated

00:29:16.360 once you've

00:29:16.920 corrected for

00:29:17.500 all the

00:29:17.740 other

00:29:18.000 variables

00:29:18.700 anybody

00:29:20.180 well there's

00:29:23.060 nobody

00:29:23.340 okay

00:29:23.920 few

00:29:24.420 people

00:29:24.860 few

00:29:28.540 people

00:29:28.880 okay

00:29:29.440 well

00:29:30.400 actually

00:29:30.800 I'm

00:29:31.440 totally

00:29:32.160 surprised

00:29:32.620 at the

00:29:32.900 answers

00:29:33.240 so most

00:29:35.080 of you

00:29:35.320 actually

00:29:35.560 believe

00:29:35.840 that the

00:29:36.140 vaccinations

00:29:36.660 protect

00:29:38.120 people

00:29:38.480 over 60

00:29:39.120 let me

00:29:40.420 hold on

00:29:41.160 stop your

00:29:42.420 answers for

00:29:42.880 a moment

00:29:43.200 let's clear

00:29:43.960 out the

00:29:44.260 cache

00:29:44.620 clear out

00:29:45.820 your

00:29:45.960 because I

00:29:46.760 want to

00:29:46.960 get a

00:29:47.260 sense of

00:29:48.160 what you

00:29:48.500 believe

00:29:49.100 my

00:29:49.560 audience

00:29:49.920 do you

00:29:52.900 believe

00:29:53.240 that

00:29:53.660 vaccinations

00:29:54.820 are more

00:29:55.580 good than

00:29:56.120 bad if

00:29:56.600 you're

00:29:56.740 over 60

00:29:57.360 go

00:29:57.660 over 60

00:29:59.120 vaccinations

00:30:00.020 good or

00:30:00.500 bad

00:30:00.760 all right

00:30:04.620 I'm looking

00:30:04.880 at the

00:30:05.160 answers

00:30:05.400 streaming

00:30:05.760 by

00:30:06.040 mostly

00:30:06.780 saying

00:30:07.120 good

00:30:07.420 but I'm

00:30:07.840 getting

00:30:08.020 some

00:30:08.260 people

00:30:08.500 saying

00:30:08.760 bad

00:30:09.120 yeah

00:30:11.540 it's

00:30:11.800 mixed

00:30:12.180 it's

00:30:12.620 mixed

00:30:13.000 how

00:30:14.760 but how

00:30:15.180 confident

00:30:15.600 are you

00:30:16.040 so when

00:30:17.100 I asked

00:30:17.440 you if

00:30:17.700 you

00:30:17.820 this is

00:30:18.320 interesting

00:30:18.700 when I

00:30:19.460 asked

00:30:19.700 if

00:30:19.860 people

00:30:20.060 would

00:30:20.260 bet

00:30:20.420 a

00:30:20.560 thousand

00:30:20.860 dollars

00:30:21.300 almost

00:30:21.740 very few

00:30:22.600 people

00:30:22.860 said

00:30:23.100 they

00:30:23.260 would

00:30:23.500 but when

00:30:25.020 I said

00:30:25.580 are they

00:30:26.580 helping

00:30:26.860 or hurting

00:30:27.300 then suddenly

00:30:28.000 people were

00:30:28.680 willing to

00:30:29.420 give their

00:30:30.160 opinion

00:30:30.480 am I wrong

00:30:32.240 that there

00:30:32.560 are a lot

00:30:32.800 of people

00:30:33.080 who have

00:30:33.300 opinions

00:30:33.740 that they

00:30:34.140 would not

00:30:34.760 back with

00:30:35.360 their own

00:30:35.720 money

00:30:36.040 that's

00:30:36.980 what it

00:30:37.220 looked

00:30:37.380 like

00:30:37.740 do a

00:30:38.700 lot of

00:30:38.920 you have

00:30:39.220 opinions

00:30:39.620 you would

00:30:39.960 not

00:30:40.180 bet on

00:30:40.800 let me

00:30:42.660 ask you

00:30:42.940 directly

00:30:43.280 well I

00:30:46.880 think

00:30:47.280 you know

00:30:48.080 I'm not

00:30:48.400 going to

00:30:48.560 get anything

00:30:48.880 useful

00:30:49.240 line of

00:30:49.580 the

00:30:50.080 streaming

00:30:50.380 answers

00:30:50.820 interesting

00:30:53.000 all right

00:30:53.820 well I

00:30:54.220 was just

00:30:54.480 interested

00:30:54.880 which way

00:30:56.500 you'd go

00:30:56.800 but

00:30:57.420 why don't

00:30:58.740 we have

00:30:59.020 a betting

00:30:59.480 we should

00:31:00.220 have a

00:31:00.500 betting

00:31:00.720 market

00:31:01.300 for that

00:31:01.700 all right

00:31:04.080 let me

00:31:04.320 give you

00:31:04.740 a persuasion

00:31:06.620 analysis

00:31:07.160 of

00:31:07.520 Carrie

00:31:07.820 Lake

00:31:08.200 which you

00:31:10.220 all want

00:31:10.660 don't you

00:31:11.040 don't you

00:31:12.880 want me to

00:31:13.440 analyze

00:31:13.780 Carrie

00:31:14.080 Lake

00:31:14.380 you know

00:31:14.700 you do

00:31:15.220 you know

00:31:16.180 you do

00:31:16.720 all right

00:31:17.480 here it

00:31:17.700 comes

00:31:17.960 number one

00:31:20.180 I dote

00:31:21.680 that the

00:31:22.120 people on

00:31:22.520 the right

00:31:22.820 often refer

00:31:23.520 to her

00:31:24.020 as a

00:31:24.700 network

00:31:25.840 news

00:31:26.560 veteran

00:31:27.780 right

00:31:29.220 so she's

00:31:29.860 like a

00:31:30.160 network

00:31:30.440 news

00:31:30.780 person

00:31:31.420 but she

00:31:32.980 was a

00:31:33.300 weather

00:31:33.560 person

00:31:34.020 am I

00:31:34.440 right

00:31:34.740 didn't she

00:31:37.360 work on

00:31:37.680 weather

00:31:38.020 can you

00:31:41.300 fact check

00:31:41.840 that

00:31:42.140 I don't

00:31:43.040 think she did

00:31:43.480 regular news

00:31:44.200 she did

00:31:44.500 weather

00:31:44.840 is that

00:31:51.020 true or

00:31:51.300 not

00:31:51.540 because I

00:31:53.980 thought she

00:31:54.360 was an

00:31:54.720 anchor

00:31:55.140 but then I

00:31:55.880 thought her

00:31:56.260 referred to

00:31:57.300 as a

00:31:59.080 meteorologist

00:31:59.860 or something

00:32:00.380 we actually

00:32:02.800 don't know

00:32:03.260 do you

00:32:03.660 interesting

00:32:05.240 so most of

00:32:06.260 you believe

00:32:06.640 she was an

00:32:07.080 anchor

00:32:07.380 yeah it

00:32:10.240 does make a

00:32:10.700 difference

00:32:11.060 it does make

00:32:11.800 a difference

00:32:12.320 because you

00:32:16.400 wouldn't expect

00:32:17.100 the same

00:32:17.680 the level

00:32:18.700 of let's

00:32:19.360 say gravity

00:32:20.420 gravitas

00:32:21.660 you wouldn't

00:32:22.520 expect the

00:32:23.080 same level

00:32:23.620 of seriousness

00:32:24.740 from the

00:32:25.700 weather person

00:32:26.380 or the

00:32:26.760 sports person

00:32:27.420 as you would

00:32:27.900 from the

00:32:28.360 news anchor

00:32:29.400 right

00:32:30.160 well

00:32:31.300 can somebody

00:32:32.580 google that

00:32:33.660 wikipedia says

00:32:35.180 anchor

00:32:35.580 interesting

00:32:38.580 so was that

00:32:39.720 fake news

00:32:40.300 because I

00:32:40.760 did see

00:32:41.160 I did see

00:32:42.200 somewhere

00:32:43.140 that she

00:32:43.520 was referred

00:32:43.960 to as

00:32:44.400 the weather

00:32:44.980 person

00:32:45.340 did she

00:32:46.280 start with

00:32:46.700 weather

00:32:46.980 and then

00:32:47.300 move to

00:32:47.740 anchor

00:32:48.080 she was

00:32:50.900 an anchor

00:32:51.260 until 2021

00:32:52.160 alright so

00:32:52.780 we're getting

00:32:53.100 the

00:32:53.460 long time

00:32:57.060 anchor

00:32:57.460 started as

00:32:59.460 weather

00:32:59.800 and moved

00:33:00.340 to Arizona

00:33:00.940 as an

00:33:01.360 anchor

00:33:01.580 okay

00:33:01.880 I think

00:33:02.980 that's the

00:33:03.320 answer

00:33:03.500 started as

00:33:04.180 weather

00:33:04.460 and moved

00:33:04.880 to anchor

00:33:05.240 alright

00:33:07.520 so

00:33:08.200 that would

00:33:10.080 explain

00:33:10.560 you know

00:33:11.000 why she

00:33:11.320 has such

00:33:11.660 a good

00:33:12.000 television

00:33:13.180 presence

00:33:13.920 right

00:33:14.360 now here

00:33:15.200 are the

00:33:15.400 things we

00:33:15.780 can agree

00:33:16.140 on

00:33:16.400 very few

00:33:17.780 people are

00:33:18.320 better

00:33:18.680 on camera

00:33:20.020 can we

00:33:21.340 agree on

00:33:21.740 that

00:33:22.000 you'd be

00:33:23.580 you'd have

00:33:24.160 to look

00:33:24.480 a long

00:33:25.400 ways to

00:33:26.120 find somebody

00:33:26.600 better on

00:33:27.040 camera

00:33:27.320 now I'm

00:33:28.340 going to

00:33:28.480 talk about

00:33:29.040 things that

00:33:30.380 are like

00:33:30.780 sexist

00:33:32.360 but it's

00:33:33.620 all part

00:33:34.280 of the

00:33:34.700 persuasion

00:33:35.720 conversation

00:33:36.560 right

00:33:36.860 number

00:33:38.240 one

00:33:38.620 do you

00:33:39.960 think she

00:33:40.260 looks

00:33:40.480 attractive

00:33:41.000 I'll

00:33:42.440 ask my

00:33:42.880 audience

00:33:43.200 before I

00:33:43.640 give you

00:33:43.940 my opinion

00:33:44.540 yes

00:33:45.760 yes

00:33:46.400 universally

00:33:47.120 yes

00:33:47.500 do you

00:33:49.440 feel

00:33:49.900 that she's

00:33:52.180 attractive

00:33:52.660 in a

00:33:53.360 feminine

00:33:53.920 way

00:33:54.520 or something

00:33:56.080 else

00:33:56.500 does she

00:33:59.000 strike you

00:34:00.120 as feminine

00:34:00.860 a little

00:34:06.620 bit of

00:34:08.220 opinions

00:34:08.680 there

00:34:09.040 so that

00:34:09.800 is

00:34:09.980 interesting

00:34:10.420 she

00:34:12.620 is

00:34:13.320 for

00:34:16.820 sure

00:34:17.220 very

00:34:18.620 attractive

00:34:19.080 but she

00:34:20.220 she cuts

00:34:21.020 masculine

00:34:21.620 and feminine

00:34:22.580 doesn't

00:34:22.940 she

00:34:23.100 she

00:34:24.000 she kind

00:34:24.500 of hits

00:34:24.760 a mix

00:34:25.220 I don't

00:34:26.360 want to

00:34:26.560 say

00:34:26.680 androgynous

00:34:27.360 because

00:34:27.560 that's

00:34:27.860 that's

00:34:28.680 like a

00:34:28.920 different

00:34:29.100 sense

00:34:29.560 I would

00:34:31.220 I would

00:34:31.640 say that

00:34:32.200 sort of

00:34:33.380 like Mick

00:34:33.820 Jagger

00:34:34.240 you know

00:34:36.340 or David

00:34:36.820 Bowie

00:34:37.200 where

00:34:38.420 where

00:34:38.740 there

00:34:38.920 there's

00:34:39.420 there's

00:34:39.680 sort of

00:34:39.960 an

00:34:40.100 ambiguity

00:34:40.560 that you

00:34:41.200 register

00:34:41.800 but you're

00:34:43.520 but it's

00:34:43.880 an attractive

00:34:44.440 ambiguity

00:34:45.140 meaning that

00:34:46.600 I think

00:34:46.980 probably

00:34:47.680 both men

00:34:48.340 and women

00:34:48.720 find her

00:34:49.180 attractive

00:34:49.560 I would

00:34:50.280 imagine

00:34:50.600 yeah

00:34:51.420 and it

00:34:51.660 makes her

00:34:51.940 look

00:34:52.080 stronger

00:34:52.520 because

00:34:52.800 she's

00:34:53.000 got a

00:34:53.240 little

00:34:53.360 bit

00:34:53.560 of the

00:34:53.920 masculine

00:34:54.960 edge

00:34:55.540 with the

00:34:56.180 feminine

00:34:56.600 pluses

00:34:58.340 as well

00:34:58.780 yeah

00:35:00.000 and she's

00:35:01.920 married to

00:35:02.340 a man

00:35:02.660 of course

00:35:03.080 right

00:35:03.520 so

00:35:04.640 so here's

00:35:07.780 my first

00:35:08.420 persuasion

00:35:09.260 point

00:35:09.760 she has

00:35:11.420 a type

00:35:12.300 of attractiveness

00:35:13.160 that is

00:35:14.340 ideal

00:35:14.920 it's ideal

00:35:16.620 for politics

00:35:17.960 would you

00:35:18.560 agree

00:35:18.820 it's not

00:35:20.160 just

00:35:20.520 attractive

00:35:21.140 because

00:35:22.020 Christy

00:35:22.780 Noem

00:35:23.140 has an

00:35:23.640 attractiveness

00:35:24.400 that is

00:35:25.820 super

00:35:26.200 attractive

00:35:26.620 as a

00:35:27.160 woman

00:35:27.440 super

00:35:28.980 feminine

00:35:29.420 well not

00:35:31.040 super

00:35:31.320 feminine

00:35:31.680 but feminine

00:35:32.220 right

00:35:32.700 but I

00:35:34.200 think that

00:35:34.560 that would

00:35:34.820 turn off

00:35:35.260 some voters

00:35:35.800 I think

00:35:36.940 the Christy

00:35:37.700 Noem

00:35:38.060 type of

00:35:38.500 attractiveness

00:35:39.180 would cause

00:35:40.580 some people

00:35:41.220 and maybe

00:35:41.880 even women

00:35:42.460 more than

00:35:42.880 men

00:35:43.120 to

00:35:44.120 grade her

00:35:46.560 more harshly

00:35:47.340 because she

00:35:48.040 looks a little

00:35:49.520 less

00:35:50.000 to some

00:35:51.340 people

00:35:51.700 might look

00:35:53.020 less substantial

00:35:53.920 because she

00:35:54.880 looked more

00:35:55.380 feminine

00:35:55.940 I guess

00:35:56.580 now I'm

00:35:57.840 talking about

00:35:58.260 people's

00:35:58.680 biases here

00:35:59.300 I'm not

00:35:59.580 talking about

00:36:00.060 my opinion

00:36:00.620 I'm talking

00:36:01.020 about people's

00:36:01.680 biases

00:36:02.040 but Carrie

00:36:03.200 Lake doesn't

00:36:03.640 have that

00:36:03.940 problem

00:36:04.240 does she

00:36:04.640 she registers

00:36:06.120 as attractive

00:36:07.320 as a woman

00:36:08.080 without giving

00:36:09.880 up anything

00:36:10.660 in strength

00:36:11.480 to the

00:36:13.100 over femininity

00:36:14.600 you know

00:36:15.360 maybe bias

00:36:16.380 right

00:36:16.980 so I would

00:36:17.980 say I've

00:36:18.300 never seen

00:36:18.700 anybody who

00:36:19.280 has a better

00:36:20.000 look for

00:36:20.780 politics

00:36:21.360 and what

00:36:23.580 is her

00:36:24.260 ethnicity

00:36:24.740 I've never

00:36:26.840 seen that

00:36:27.280 mentioned

00:36:27.700 her ethnicity

00:36:29.180 is

00:36:29.980 her ethnicity

00:36:33.500 is hot

00:36:34.040 somebody said

00:36:35.080 but she's

00:36:36.840 brownish

00:36:37.480 right

00:36:37.800 again

00:36:38.940 we're just

00:36:40.160 talking about

00:36:40.580 the persuasion

00:36:41.800 here so

00:36:42.340 don't assume

00:36:43.580 I'm being

00:36:44.000 bigoted or

00:36:44.760 anything else

00:36:45.400 we're just

00:36:45.720 talking about

00:36:46.140 what people

00:36:47.240 perceive

00:36:47.820 so it's

00:36:50.800 just an

00:36:51.100 Arizona

00:36:51.460 tan

00:36:51.860 she's just

00:36:52.480 well tanned

00:36:53.040 so that

00:36:54.380 works really

00:36:54.860 well for her

00:36:55.340 doesn't it

00:36:55.740 I don't know

00:36:56.360 what she is

00:36:56.940 but she's

00:36:57.400 ambiguous

00:36:57.800 and she's

00:36:59.080 pretty brown

00:36:59.600 for maybe

00:37:02.020 a white girl

00:37:02.700 I don't know

00:37:03.280 whatever she

00:37:03.900 is

00:37:04.180 so I don't

00:37:05.140 care

00:37:05.540 but I think

00:37:06.900 that works

00:37:07.360 too

00:37:07.600 so I think

00:37:09.100 she works

00:37:09.540 on color

00:37:10.460 look

00:37:10.940 haircut

00:37:11.440 femininity

00:37:13.040 just the right

00:37:13.980 amount of

00:37:14.620 you know

00:37:14.980 not too

00:37:15.400 feminine

00:37:15.740 a little bit

00:37:16.260 of masculinity

00:37:16.880 put in there

00:37:17.700 yeah she's

00:37:18.900 she's got

00:37:19.760 the perfect

00:37:20.300 look

00:37:20.840 but let's

00:37:21.900 talk about

00:37:22.240 her voice

00:37:22.840 have you ever

00:37:24.640 heard a voice

00:37:25.260 like hers

00:37:25.940 it's really

00:37:27.980 unique

00:37:28.500 yeah

00:37:29.120 it's fun

00:37:29.920 to listen

00:37:30.360 to

00:37:30.640 but let me

00:37:31.880 tell you

00:37:32.160 the trick

00:37:32.540 that she

00:37:32.920 uses

00:37:33.280 that I've

00:37:34.020 talked about

00:37:34.440 before

00:37:34.820 but when you

00:37:35.320 see it

00:37:35.700 in practice

00:37:36.240 it's awesome

00:37:37.640 she's a

00:37:39.960 down talker

00:37:40.780 do you know

00:37:42.500 what an up

00:37:42.820 talker is

00:37:43.340 right

00:37:43.560 so up

00:37:45.420 talkers

00:37:45.940 sound

00:37:46.980 unconfident

00:37:47.820 an up

00:37:49.420 talker

00:37:49.740 would sound

00:37:50.100 like this

00:37:50.620 I think

00:37:51.580 we need

00:37:51.940 to lower

00:37:52.760 taxes

00:37:53.140 we need

00:37:54.860 to close

00:37:55.820 the border

00:37:56.220 and then

00:37:57.760 the other

00:37:58.040 thing that

00:37:58.540 bad politicians

00:37:59.560 do

00:37:59.960 is they

00:38:01.300 they bleat

00:38:03.060 like sheep

00:38:04.020 when they're

00:38:05.700 when they don't

00:38:06.420 believe their

00:38:06.900 own argument

00:38:07.580 they adopt

00:38:10.180 a pleading

00:38:12.120 kind of a

00:38:12.800 tone

00:38:13.180 that signals

00:38:14.880 they don't

00:38:15.280 believe their

00:38:15.720 own argument

00:38:16.220 right

00:38:17.040 so I was

00:38:19.160 watching her

00:38:19.680 on

00:38:20.200 on Tucker's

00:38:21.800 show

00:38:21.940 there was

00:38:22.180 some video

00:38:22.600 of her

00:38:22.880 and watching

00:38:24.340 her talk

00:38:25.000 there is a

00:38:26.080 time when she

00:38:26.760 down talks

00:38:27.600 perfectly

00:38:28.160 and let me

00:38:29.100 give you an

00:38:29.420 example of

00:38:29.880 down talk

00:38:30.360 down talk

00:38:31.300 is the

00:38:31.580 opposite of

00:38:32.280 ending on

00:38:32.720 a high

00:38:33.000 point

00:38:33.300 if you end

00:38:34.460 on a down

00:38:34.960 point you

00:38:35.360 sound like

00:38:35.860 an executive

00:38:36.400 right

00:38:37.720 because you're

00:38:38.420 saying everything

00:38:38.940 is matter

00:38:39.340 of fact

00:38:39.680 so here's

00:38:40.900 I'll try to

00:38:41.740 do an

00:38:41.960 impression

00:38:42.320 of proper

00:38:43.720 confident

00:38:44.960 executive

00:38:45.880 down talk

00:38:46.900 right

00:38:48.580 so first

00:38:50.020 I'll give

00:38:50.280 you the

00:38:50.620 the contrast

00:38:51.740 an up talk

00:38:52.540 would be

00:38:53.000 and we need

00:38:54.140 we need

00:38:54.640 nuclear energy

00:38:55.900 plants

00:38:56.220 we've got to

00:38:57.080 have nuclear

00:38:57.600 energy plants

00:38:58.300 or we'll never

00:38:58.940 be able to

00:38:59.360 reach our

00:38:59.760 our goals

00:39:00.640 we'll never

00:39:00.980 have enough

00:39:01.300 energy

00:39:01.620 we have to

00:39:02.960 have nuclear

00:39:03.740 energy plants

00:39:04.540 that's a

00:39:05.420 pleading voice

00:39:06.340 doesn't sound

00:39:07.540 powerful

00:39:07.960 now here's

00:39:09.380 the executive

00:39:09.960 and the only

00:39:11.740 way we're

00:39:12.140 going to

00:39:12.680 be able to

00:39:13.140 give power

00:39:13.580 in the future

00:39:14.140 is through

00:39:15.100 nuclear power

00:39:15.980 nuclear power

00:39:17.560 will allow us

00:39:18.780 to have

00:39:20.560 enough energy

00:39:21.080 in the future

00:39:21.620 and at the

00:39:22.380 moment there's

00:39:22.920 no alternative

00:39:23.640 now forget

00:39:26.680 about whether

00:39:27.140 that's true

00:39:27.820 but you see

00:39:29.100 you see what

00:39:29.580 I'm talking

00:39:29.880 about right

00:39:30.240 the way I

00:39:31.340 said it

00:39:31.920 tells you

00:39:33.220 it's not up

00:39:33.960 for debate

00:39:34.580 it's not up

00:39:36.860 for debate

00:39:37.400 I'm telling

00:39:38.100 you what

00:39:38.420 the facts

00:39:38.880 are

00:39:39.160 and then

00:39:39.780 you have

00:39:40.100 to decide

00:39:40.560 what to

00:39:40.860 do with

00:39:41.100 that

00:39:41.320 when

00:39:42.420 and I

00:39:43.140 was watching

00:39:43.600 Carrie Lake

00:39:44.460 when she was

00:39:45.120 talking about

00:39:46.120 the media

00:39:46.680 in the area

00:39:47.860 which she has

00:39:48.560 you know

00:39:48.860 complete expertise

00:39:49.780 and when she

00:39:51.340 talked about

00:39:51.720 the media

00:39:52.100 she used

00:39:52.940 down talk

00:39:53.760 and wow

00:39:55.060 is it

00:39:55.680 so effective

00:39:57.240 but

00:39:58.700 for a moment

00:40:00.380 she transitioned

00:40:01.700 into what

00:40:02.540 I'll call

00:40:02.920 the talking

00:40:04.160 points

00:40:04.680 the generic

00:40:06.820 stuff about

00:40:07.720 you know

00:40:08.480 Democrats

00:40:09.020 are trying

00:40:09.560 to ruin

00:40:09.940 everything

00:40:10.440 blah blah

00:40:10.880 and she

00:40:11.840 and she

00:40:12.480 slipped

00:40:13.040 into

00:40:13.620 pleading

00:40:14.500 and you

00:40:16.160 could tell

00:40:16.520 the transition

00:40:17.180 between the

00:40:17.780 things she

00:40:18.200 was completely

00:40:18.820 confident about

00:40:19.820 and had a

00:40:20.520 right to be

00:40:20.920 confident

00:40:21.280 and the

00:40:22.480 things that

00:40:23.060 were clearly

00:40:24.620 propaganda

00:40:25.640 politics

00:40:27.080 kind of

00:40:27.520 stuff

00:40:27.840 that is

00:40:29.080 really

00:40:29.340 salesmanship

00:40:30.140 right

00:40:31.540 and you

00:40:32.060 could see

00:40:32.360 her shift

00:40:32.880 from

00:40:33.820 this is

00:40:34.440 just

00:40:34.660 fact

00:40:35.100 you know

00:40:36.500 get out

00:40:37.160 of my

00:40:37.400 way

00:40:37.700 this is

00:40:38.420 just

00:40:38.660 a fact

00:40:39.220 that part

00:40:40.620 is so

00:40:41.120 strong

00:40:41.620 but as soon

00:40:43.140 as she gets

00:40:43.580 into the

00:40:44.160 politics

00:40:44.740 she gets

00:40:45.620 a little

00:40:46.040 pleady

00:40:47.200 and then she

00:40:48.000 loses

00:40:48.300 some of that

00:40:48.820 strength

00:40:49.240 I think

00:40:50.880 she could

00:40:51.300 change her

00:40:52.060 talking points

00:40:53.200 to maintain

00:40:54.580 the strength

00:40:55.240 all the way

00:40:55.680 through

00:40:56.020 and then it

00:40:57.000 would just

00:40:57.280 be devastating

00:40:57.960 yeah the

00:41:01.000 up talk

00:41:01.420 makes you

00:41:01.860 sound

00:41:02.120 insecure

00:41:02.620 that's

00:41:03.080 true

00:41:03.620 correct

00:41:05.760 so I

00:41:08.740 usually don't

00:41:09.520 make a big

00:41:10.360 deal about

00:41:10.940 the quality

00:41:11.860 of voice

00:41:12.460 for persuasion

00:41:13.500 the exception

00:41:15.200 is when the

00:41:15.900 quality of the

00:41:16.600 voice is

00:41:17.140 amazing

00:41:17.860 and I think

00:41:19.020 Obama had

00:41:19.680 that

00:41:19.960 Obama had

00:41:21.060 the voice

00:41:21.640 he stammered

00:41:22.840 too much

00:41:23.200 but he had

00:41:23.980 the voice

00:41:24.440 it just

00:41:24.780 sounded

00:41:25.260 he just

00:41:26.220 liked the

00:41:26.660 timbre of

00:41:27.180 it

00:41:27.380 right

00:41:27.740 so if

00:41:29.200 you have

00:41:29.400 an extremely

00:41:30.040 good voice

00:41:30.760 as she

00:41:31.160 does

00:41:31.540 then it's

00:41:32.420 an asset

00:41:32.900 but for

00:41:33.980 most people

00:41:34.400 it doesn't

00:41:34.640 make much

00:41:35.000 difference

00:41:35.420 yeah

00:41:38.500 all right

00:41:40.040 and that

00:41:42.660 ladies and

00:41:43.200 gentlemen

00:41:43.480 is my

00:41:46.060 grumpy

00:41:46.560 opinion

00:41:47.240 for today

00:41:47.820 I've got

00:41:50.020 to go fix

00:41:50.480 my coffee

00:41:51.020 maker

00:41:51.400 might set

00:41:52.560 me on a

00:41:53.000 better

00:41:53.400 trajectory

00:41:53.960 for today

00:41:54.640 so I

00:42:02.820 my doctor

00:42:04.140 asked me

00:42:04.700 to test

00:42:05.360 my blood

00:42:06.180 pressure

00:42:06.500 at home

00:42:06.820 so it's

00:42:08.360 just a

00:42:08.680 normal thing

00:42:09.240 if you're

00:42:09.720 on blood

00:42:10.200 pressure

00:42:10.520 meds

00:42:10.980 the new

00:42:12.120 remote

00:42:12.780 medical

00:42:13.740 practices

00:42:14.420 are that

00:42:15.000 they ask

00:42:15.620 you to get

00:42:15.980 a blood

00:42:16.660 pressure

00:42:16.980 monitor

00:42:17.440 and just

00:42:17.820 do it

00:42:18.040 yourself

00:42:18.320 so I was

00:42:19.500 testing it

00:42:20.200 and I

00:42:20.820 noticed in

00:42:21.280 the instructions

00:42:21.920 on the

00:42:22.320 email

00:42:22.600 that asked

00:42:23.600 me to

00:42:23.860 test my

00:42:24.340 blood

00:42:24.580 pressure

00:42:24.860 it said

00:42:26.080 don't do

00:42:26.600 it within

00:42:26.960 30 minutes

00:42:27.620 of having

00:42:28.020 coffee

00:42:28.440 and I

00:42:30.900 didn't read

00:42:31.300 that part

00:42:31.780 or I'd

00:42:32.080 forgotten it

00:42:32.720 and so I

00:42:34.100 randomly sat

00:42:35.060 down after I

00:42:35.800 came back

00:42:36.140 from Starbucks

00:42:36.960 and I

00:42:38.340 tested my

00:42:38.800 blood

00:42:38.980 pressure

00:42:39.480 have you

00:42:43.140 ever done

00:42:43.500 that

00:42:43.800 test your

00:42:44.780 blood

00:42:45.000 pressure

00:42:45.340 directly

00:42:46.120 after you

00:42:46.740 come back

00:42:47.120 from

00:42:47.300 Starbucks

00:42:47.860 it was

00:42:49.520 hospitalization

00:42:50.560 level

00:42:50.940 it was

00:42:53.000 like

00:42:53.260 it was

00:42:53.900 like

00:42:54.080 9-1-1

00:42:54.860 so

00:42:57.980 I wait

00:42:59.260 three hours

00:43:00.720 and I

00:43:01.020 test it

00:43:01.440 again

00:43:01.740 120

00:43:03.440 over 80

00:43:04.020 no problem

00:43:05.420 but

00:43:06.960 half an

00:43:07.780 hour after

00:43:08.300 I had

00:43:08.600 Starbucks

00:43:09.120 it was

00:43:09.960 actually

00:43:10.360 literally

00:43:11.860 I would

00:43:13.860 probably

00:43:14.480 drive to

00:43:14.940 the hospital

00:43:15.500 it was

00:43:16.920 like

00:43:17.080 160

00:43:17.720 over

00:43:18.240 120

00:43:21.360 or

00:43:21.740 some

00:43:22.160 fucking

00:43:22.480 thing

00:43:22.800 yeah

00:43:23.320 it was

00:43:23.440 like

00:43:23.600 160

00:43:24.160 over

00:43:24.500 something

00:43:24.860 can you

00:43:33.960 lower your

00:43:34.420 BP

00:43:34.680 with

00:43:34.940 meditation

00:43:35.700 I doubt

00:43:37.360 it

00:43:37.640 I mean

00:43:40.260 I don't

00:43:40.800 know that

00:43:41.080 you can

00:43:41.340 get it

00:43:41.560 all the

00:43:41.760 way

00:43:41.860 down

00:43:42.080 now

00:43:43.560 I am

00:43:44.780 also

00:43:45.060 wondering

00:43:45.500 if my

00:43:46.700 pain

00:43:48.240 and energy

00:43:48.700 is related

00:43:49.220 to the

00:43:49.520 blood

00:43:49.700 pressure

00:43:50.020 meds

00:43:50.420 as

00:43:50.600 possible

00:43:51.000 yeah

00:43:52.040 you can

00:43:52.520 survive

00:43:52.900 160

00:43:53.440 you just

00:43:53.880 don't

00:43:54.040 want to

00:43:54.240 do it

00:43:54.420 for a

00:43:54.640 long

00:43:54.800 time

00:43:55.080 that's

00:43:56.100 a little

00:43:56.320 bit of

00:43:56.600 hyperbole

00:43:57.140 from me

00:43:58.380 hypnosis

00:44:03.500 yeah

00:44:04.160 all the

00:44:04.800 lifestyle

00:44:05.220 stuff

00:44:05.640 does

00:44:05.960 work

00:44:06.420 but if

00:44:07.420 you have

00:44:07.660 a genetic

00:44:08.380 propensity

00:44:10.760 I'm about

00:44:13.160 as close

00:44:13.800 as you

00:44:14.140 can get

00:44:14.640 to

00:44:15.560 lifestyle

00:44:16.520 acceptable

00:44:18.360 behavior

00:44:19.400 you know

00:44:20.940 I do

00:44:22.600 pretty well

00:44:23.080 I don't

00:44:23.460 sleep as

00:44:23.880 much as

00:44:24.220 I should

00:44:24.520 do you

00:44:32.560 think

00:44:32.780 Biden's

00:44:33.300 doing

00:44:33.540 well

00:44:34.180 I can't

00:44:37.260 see that

00:44:37.640 in his

00:44:38.460 China

00:44:38.760 stuff

00:44:39.120 well

00:44:40.140 I don't

00:44:43.280 know what's

00:44:43.660 going on

00:44:44.060 with China

00:44:44.520 I feel

00:44:45.660 like all

00:44:46.080 of our

00:44:46.380 news is

00:44:46.800 so

00:44:47.140 inaccurate

00:44:48.260 no I'm

00:44:51.120 not taking

00:44:51.500 any

00:44:51.800 NSAIDs

00:44:53.020 you once

00:44:57.400 snorted a

00:44:57.980 caterpillar

00:44:58.440 okay

00:44:59.520 why am I

00:45:03.520 avoiding

00:45:03.940 Daryl

00:45:04.500 Brooks

00:45:04.940 as a

00:45:05.440 topic

00:45:05.800 apparently

00:45:07.200 I'm avoiding

00:45:08.020 Daryl

00:45:08.620 Brooks

00:45:09.020 as a

00:45:09.460 topic

00:45:09.820 because

00:45:12.360 I never

00:45:12.800 heard that

00:45:13.120 name

00:45:13.360 before

00:45:13.860 let's

00:45:14.700 see

00:45:15.080 let's

00:45:16.060 see who

00:45:16.300 exactly

00:45:16.680 I am

00:45:17.280 ignoring

00:45:17.880 Daryl

00:45:20.960 Brooks

00:45:21.820 he's a

00:45:27.080 defendant

00:45:27.500 he cries

00:45:28.700 during his

00:45:29.180 opening

00:45:29.480 statement

00:45:30.180 what did

00:45:32.840 he do

00:45:33.220 oh is

00:45:37.360 he the

00:45:37.640 guy who

00:45:38.300 ran over

00:45:39.100 the

00:45:39.460 Waukesha

00:45:40.660 Christmas

00:45:41.200 parade

00:45:41.580 trial

00:45:41.920 why would

00:45:44.900 I want

00:45:45.160 to talk

00:45:45.420 about him

00:45:45.880 why in

00:45:48.560 the world

00:45:48.940 would that

00:45:49.320 be interesting

00:45:49.900 yeah

00:45:55.280 no I

00:45:56.780 really I

00:45:57.220 know I

00:45:57.580 remember what

00:45:58.080 the story

00:45:58.440 was that

00:45:59.120 you know

00:45:59.400 they reported

00:46:00.040 his car

00:46:00.600 killed people

00:46:01.260 etc

00:46:01.700 but

00:46:02.760 there's no

00:46:04.800 reason to

00:46:05.660 oh by the

00:46:08.240 way speaking

00:46:08.720 of yay

00:46:09.160 I told you

00:46:13.480 I can't

00:46:14.840 watch anything

00:46:15.400 on the

00:46:15.880 daily wire

00:46:16.560 because every

00:46:17.000 time I try

00:46:17.460 to sign up

00:46:18.060 it's too

00:46:19.480 hard

00:46:19.800 and I

00:46:22.740 got some

00:46:23.100 help from

00:46:23.720 one of

00:46:25.740 you I

00:46:26.060 won't

00:46:26.500 mention

00:46:26.880 you

00:46:27.120 who sent

00:46:28.100 lengthy

00:46:28.700 instructions

00:46:29.320 of how

00:46:29.860 to do

00:46:30.100 it and

00:46:30.320 I was

00:46:30.460 like oh

00:46:30.780 thank you

00:46:31.260 and then

00:46:32.100 I got

00:46:33.140 busy and

00:46:33.740 then I

00:46:33.980 lost those

00:46:34.440 instructions

00:46:34.900 so if

00:46:37.580 I can't

00:46:37.960 sign up

00:46:38.240 quickly it's

00:46:38.800 just not

00:46:39.120 going to

00:46:39.300 happen

00:46:39.540 because I

00:46:40.060 get too

00:46:40.540 interrupted

00:46:40.980 so if

00:46:42.160 I can

00:46:42.420 sign up

00:46:43.260 for a

00:46:43.520 service in

00:46:44.040 60 seconds

00:46:44.920 which is how

00:46:46.060 long it

00:46:46.420 should take

00:46:46.980 because all

00:46:47.720 you're doing

00:46:48.040 is putting

00:46:48.480 into your

00:46:48.800 credentials

00:46:49.280 then I'll

00:46:50.880 sign up

00:46:51.320 but as

00:46:52.740 soon as

00:46:53.100 it takes

00:46:53.720 me to

00:46:54.100 another

00:46:54.380 site

00:46:54.880 or wants

00:46:56.380 me to

00:46:56.820 do

00:46:57.180 something

00:46:57.740 anything

00:46:58.800 out of

00:46:59.100 the ordinary

00:46:59.480 I'm like

00:46:59.920 I'll get

00:47:00.360 back to

00:47:00.680 that later

00:47:01.080 it never

00:47:01.440 happens

00:47:01.820 no I

00:47:04.340 don't believe

00:47:04.700 I am on

00:47:05.120 the spectrum

00:47:05.700 I don't

00:47:07.840 believe I

00:47:08.260 am

00:47:08.580 have you

00:47:11.400 tried a

00:47:11.720 sauna to

00:47:12.180 relieve

00:47:12.500 pain

00:47:12.940 no

00:47:16.780 but I

00:47:17.700 don't

00:47:17.840 like

00:47:18.080 heat

00:47:18.500 so I

00:47:19.420 don't

00:47:19.520 know

00:47:19.660 if I

00:47:19.860 can

00:47:19.980 handle

00:47:20.220 that

00:47:20.500 yeah

00:47:24.760 the

00:47:25.420 SUV

00:47:25.780 guy

00:47:26.040 representing

00:47:26.760 himself

00:47:27.140 would be

00:47:27.460 fun

00:47:27.720 I do

00:47:29.600 have an

00:47:29.960 infrared

00:47:30.240 sauna

00:47:30.600 I've

00:47:30.940 never

00:47:31.120 used

00:47:31.360 it

00:47:32.220 I hear

00:47:34.560 good

00:47:34.760 things

00:47:35.000 about

00:47:35.200 him

00:47:35.320 but I

00:47:35.520 just

00:47:35.680 I

00:47:36.000 don't

00:47:36.100 like

00:47:36.300 heat

00:47:36.560 so

00:47:43.180 did you

00:47:44.700 see that

00:47:45.300 Ye used

00:47:46.420 the R

00:47:46.980 word

00:47:47.380 on a

00:47:48.100 video

00:47:48.380 and he

00:47:49.460 stopped

00:47:49.820 himself

00:47:50.180 before he

00:47:50.720 used it

00:47:51.220 but then

00:47:52.040 he used

00:47:52.400 it anyway

00:47:52.900 because

00:47:53.400 he's just

00:47:54.920 done

00:47:55.260 censoring

00:47:55.980 himself

00:47:56.400 so he

00:47:58.000 called

00:47:58.440 somebody

00:47:58.800 a

00:47:59.940 tard

00:48:00.240 and I

00:48:02.060 thought to

00:48:02.360 myself

00:48:02.720 well he's

00:48:03.760 gone so

00:48:04.260 far that

00:48:04.680 he can

00:48:04.960 say that

00:48:05.360 now

00:48:05.580 right

00:48:05.820 because

00:48:06.480 you know

00:48:07.020 I think

00:48:08.780 at this

00:48:09.080 point

00:48:09.440 I think

00:48:16.100 at this

00:48:16.340 point

00:48:16.560 Kanye

00:48:16.900 can say

00:48:17.300 anything

00:48:17.540 I just

00:48:17.900 saw a

00:48:18.140 comment

00:48:18.380 go by

00:48:18.740 that made

00:48:19.040 me laugh

00:48:19.340 when you

00:48:20.820 say that

00:48:21.260 you have

00:48:21.660 generalized

00:48:22.320 pain

00:48:22.900 it turns

00:48:24.000 out that

00:48:24.460 the possible

00:48:25.360 causes of

00:48:26.120 it are

00:48:27.040 everything

00:48:27.600 you do

00:48:28.160 so I've

00:48:30.040 had people

00:48:30.440 suggest that

00:48:31.140 it's everything

00:48:31.600 from my

00:48:32.440 diet to

00:48:33.360 you name it

00:48:34.300 so I have

00:48:35.400 a list of

00:48:35.960 probably 20

00:48:37.320 different things

00:48:38.220 that are

00:48:38.900 entirely possible

00:48:39.800 like I'm not

00:48:41.000 I wouldn't

00:48:41.400 rule out

00:48:41.860 diet at all

00:48:42.700 but there are

00:48:43.840 at least 20

00:48:44.620 things that

00:48:46.080 I'm going to

00:48:46.380 have to isolate

00:48:47.020 one at a

00:48:47.680 time to see

00:48:48.280 if they make

00:48:48.700 a difference

00:48:49.180 so I don't

00:48:51.720 think it's

00:48:52.020 aging because

00:48:52.580 it happened

00:48:52.920 all at once

00:48:53.500 aging would

00:48:55.860 have been

00:48:56.060 more gradual

00:48:56.980 I mean I

00:48:57.980 could certainly

00:48:58.440 see what

00:48:58.840 aging does

00:48:59.400 but I

00:48:59.900 just fell

00:49:00.280 off a

00:49:00.680 table

00:49:02.220 yeah it

00:49:10.100 could be

00:49:10.380 the BP

00:49:10.780 meds

00:49:11.180 somebody

00:49:12.180 mentioned

00:49:12.860 that they

00:49:13.240 had the

00:49:13.480 same

00:49:13.640 problem

00:49:14.020 and they

00:49:14.480 got off

00:49:14.820 their meds

00:49:15.420 and they

00:49:16.120 felt fine

00:49:16.660 I suppose

00:49:17.980 I could

00:49:19.300 probably just

00:49:19.820 stop taking

00:49:20.400 it for a

00:49:20.720 day and

00:49:21.020 see if it

00:49:21.340 matters

00:49:21.680 blue balls

00:49:24.260 is that

00:49:26.720 it do I

00:49:27.080 need to

00:49:27.320 get laid

00:49:27.720 maybe

00:49:30.940 that's

00:49:31.240 all it

00:49:31.560 is

00:49:31.740 I don't

00:49:34.760 know I

00:49:34.920 think I'm

00:49:35.300 going to

00:49:35.640 give up

00:49:36.000 on humans

00:49:37.580 oh yeah

00:49:43.760 the Steve

00:49:44.260 Bannon

00:49:44.580 sentencing

00:49:45.200 is happening

00:49:45.760 right now

00:49:46.360 now he

00:49:46.820 could get

00:49:48.100 up to

00:49:48.360 two years

00:49:49.140 for

00:49:49.940 refusing to

00:49:52.120 testify

00:49:52.700 was that

00:49:53.480 what it

00:49:54.000 was

00:49:54.280 yeah it's

00:49:59.740 definitely

00:50:00.000 not

00:50:00.240 shingles

00:50:00.700 all right

00:50:04.320 contempt of

00:50:05.720 congress

00:50:06.220 you think

00:50:07.760 contempt of

00:50:08.480 congress would

00:50:09.120 be more

00:50:09.660 like an

00:50:10.000 award

00:50:10.480 shouldn't

00:50:12.360 you get

00:50:12.680 like a

00:50:13.180 medal

00:50:13.460 and now

00:50:14.840 I'd like

00:50:15.420 to give

00:50:15.720 the

00:50:16.080 prestigious

00:50:16.920 citizen of

00:50:19.580 the year

00:50:19.880 award

00:50:20.420 to Steve

00:50:21.020 Bannon

00:50:21.360 for

00:50:23.440 contempt of

00:50:24.220 congress

00:50:24.680 we would

00:50:26.000 all like

00:50:26.520 to be

00:50:26.860 like Steve

00:50:27.480 and show

00:50:28.140 our contempt

00:50:28.760 for congress

00:50:29.380 but only

00:50:29.820 Steve

00:50:30.240 was brave

00:50:31.520 enough to

00:50:31.920 do it

00:50:32.320 so Steve

00:50:33.840 for

00:50:35.580 contempt of

00:50:36.440 congress

00:50:36.880 we give you

00:50:38.200 the citizen

00:50:38.900 of the year

00:50:39.480 award

00:50:39.900 but apparently

00:50:42.140 they actually

00:50:42.780 punish you

00:50:43.340 for having

00:50:43.820 the same

00:50:44.200 opinion as

00:50:44.800 everybody

00:50:45.200 and acting

00:50:46.720 the same

00:50:47.120 way ordinary

00:50:48.120 people would

00:50:48.720 act

00:50:53.980 I know

00:50:54.800 the trouble

00:50:55.680 is you

00:50:56.480 don't want

00:50:56.880 a Nelson

00:50:57.380 Mandela

00:50:57.960 Steve Bannon

00:50:58.780 he'll come

00:50:59.560 back as

00:51:00.060 the president

00:51:00.640 you put

00:51:03.480 Steve Bannon

00:51:04.060 in jail for

00:51:05.080 two years

00:51:05.640 and he's

00:51:05.960 going to

00:51:06.600 come back

00:51:07.040 as Christ

00:51:07.740 even I

00:51:13.880 might vote

00:51:14.300 for him

00:51:14.720 that's

00:51:19.020 saying a lot

00:51:19.540 I might

00:51:21.000 even register

00:51:21.600 to vote

00:51:22.140 it's not

00:51:25.120 because I

00:51:25.520 agree with

00:51:26.040 him or

00:51:26.280 anything

00:51:26.480 it's just

00:51:27.400 that if

00:51:28.180 you're putting

00:51:28.480 Steve Bannon

00:51:29.140 in jail

00:51:29.660 because of

00:51:30.960 your kangaroo

00:51:31.600 court

00:51:32.060 he might

00:51:34.360 come out

00:51:34.720 as Jesus

00:51:35.220 that's all

00:51:35.760 I'm saying

00:51:36.160 he might

00:51:37.060 get elected

00:51:37.460 president

00:51:37.940 the day

00:51:38.720 he gets

00:51:39.000 out

00:51:39.260 anyway

00:51:40.860 that's all

00:51:41.360 for now

00:51:41.680 I'll talk

00:51:42.060 to you

00:51:42.260 later

00:51:42.500 bye

00:51:43.560 YouTube

00:51:43.880 I'll talk

00:51:59.560 about

00:52:00.680 you

00:52:01.100 you

00:52:01.700 you

00:52:02.640 you

00:52:06.400 you

00:52:06.920 you

00:52:07.360 you

00:52:07.680 you

00:52:08.900 you

00:52:10.780 you

00:52:11.880 you

00:52:12.880 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 21, 2022

Episode 1903 Scott Adams： I'm Grumpy This Morning. This Will Not Go Well

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript