Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 29, 2022


Episode 1911 Scott Adams: Let's Have Fun With The News Because Its Been A Wonderful Week


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 26 minutes

Words per minute

145.02019

Word count

12,582

Sentence count

922

Harmful content

Misogyny

22

sentences flagged

Hate speech

29

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A story about a TV show with a very unusual name, and why it's a good one. Plus, Elon Musk's purchase of Tesla and why he should kill the company before the end of the year. And, of course, there's coffee.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to what might be the dawn of the golden age.
00:00:06.040 I think Musk's purchase of Twitter is changing things more than I thought.
00:00:11.600 And I feel like it's not changing the technology so much as how we're thinking about everything and how we see everything.
00:00:19.480 More about that later.
00:00:21.220 But first, how would you like to take it up a notch?
00:00:24.380 All the way from the most exciting thing that's ever happened to you, coffee with Scott Adams, to something transcendent.
00:00:33.080 Well, if you'd like to do that, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tanker, chelzer, stein, a canteen, jug, or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:40.820 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:42.980 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:49.720 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:51.820 And I love you, too.
00:00:54.380 Mmm, mmm, mmm, mmm. Savor it. Savor it. Savor it.
00:01:07.040 Well, Dilbert.com is down this morning. I don't know why. I'll look into it later, but apparently my own website's down.
00:01:15.640 I don't manage it, so I guess I'll have to look into that, too.
00:01:18.580 All right, I've got to tell you this story, but I don't want to give you the personal identifiers in it, so it's sort of a real story, but I'm going to change the name, the name in the story.
00:01:33.020 This actually happened to me last night.
00:01:35.780 So last night, I was in an extended conversation, in a digital way, over the choice of a name.
00:01:46.820 And the idea was to come up with an unusual name, sort of not a common name.
00:01:53.420 It doesn't matter what the name was for or anything.
00:01:56.420 And I'm just going to make up a name.
00:01:58.840 Mortimer.
00:01:59.280 Mortimer. That wasn't the real name.
00:02:01.440 So just imagine that this really happened, but the name is different, right?
00:02:05.560 So conversation went like this.
00:02:08.200 I'm thinking of Mortimer or Mort.
00:02:11.860 Yeah, that's great.
00:02:13.360 You know, that's great for a number of reasons.
00:02:15.420 All right.
00:02:16.240 All right, that's the name.
00:02:17.180 It's going to be Mortimer.
00:02:19.080 Now, keep in mind that Mortimer, I picked it in my example because it's a very unusual name.
00:02:24.120 You don't really, well, Morty, yeah.
00:02:26.700 But you don't hear Mortimer too much, do you?
00:02:29.280 Now, the real name was not Mortimer.
00:02:32.240 It was another one, but it was as unusual as that.
00:02:35.340 Now, 30 minutes after this conversation, and I want to say this clearly,
00:02:41.820 it's a name I probably have never used in 50 years or more.
00:02:47.980 So probably it's a name that has never crossed my lips,
00:02:53.760 and rarely would you ever hear it in the real world.
00:02:56.680 It's a very unusual name.
00:02:57.940 I turned on a TV show from the 70s, and there was an episode in which a huge scene was all about that name
00:03:11.320 and what a good name it was.
00:03:13.000 Now, what the fuck was that all about?
00:03:20.740 And literally, it literally included the phrase, wow, that's a good name, within 30 minutes.
00:03:29.640 What does that mean?
00:03:30.940 I mean, seriously, that couldn't have happened by coincidence, could it?
00:03:38.980 I mean, here's what a coincidence would look like.
00:03:42.800 I'm not going to tell you the name of the show, because I don't want to put any identifiers in it.
00:03:47.640 But it was just crazy.
00:03:52.560 And it's the sort of thing where you have to sit there and think, did I make that happen?
00:03:59.100 I mean, it would be one thing if you simply heard the name, right?
00:04:03.340 That would be a coincidence, because you see that a lot.
00:04:06.100 If the only thing that happened is, you know, we talked about Mortimer, and then I turned on the show,
00:04:12.520 and somebody was named Mortimer, I wouldn't think that's a big coincidence.
00:04:17.220 That would just be like an interesting little thing.
00:04:19.220 But it was a whole scene about whether it was a good name.
00:04:23.120 That is very specific.
00:04:24.520 I mean, how often have you even seen a TV show that discussed whether a name was a good name for a person?
00:04:33.600 And it's just so rare.
00:04:35.040 Anyway, I was blown away by it.
00:04:37.420 All right, so let's talk about some persuasion tips for you.
00:04:43.080 So I tweeted today.
00:04:44.520 As you know, it's been my mission to kill ESG before the end of the year.
00:04:49.240 Now, when I say kill it, I mean mortally wounded, right?
00:04:52.480 It's still going to limp along for a while.
00:04:54.040 But by the end of this year, I want to make it difficult for anyone to think ESG is a good idea.
00:05:01.580 Like, you should sort of automatically feel a little embarrassed if you mention it.
00:05:07.220 And so I tweeted this.
00:05:08.680 I said, if by 2023, just, you know, once for now,
00:05:13.540 if by 2023 you still think ESG is a public good, as opposed to a money-making scheme, that's on you.
00:05:20.920 Now, let me explain the persuasion that is embedded in this simple tweet.
00:05:28.640 Number one, I put a date on it so it makes it sound a little more serious.
00:05:33.620 Whenever you put a date on something or you put a number on it,
00:05:37.760 it takes a concept that doesn't exist and just hardens it.
00:05:42.040 So now it's like a little more real because there's a date.
00:05:45.680 Do you remember what I said provocatively back in 2020?
00:05:53.700 I said that if Biden got elected, there's a good chance you'll be dead in a year.
00:06:00.260 What was the operative part about that?
00:06:03.100 The dead or the year?
00:06:05.400 Well, they're both pretty operative, but the year actually is pretty operative.
00:06:11.260 Yeah, the year is what makes it solid.
00:06:14.160 Like, oh, it's not just a concern.
00:06:17.960 If I said there's a good chance you'll be dead,
00:06:20.940 then that would just be sort of a free-floating concern.
00:06:23.720 But as soon as I put it within a year, it hardened it,
00:06:26.560 and then everybody got excited about it.
00:06:28.520 So I did the same thing.
00:06:29.660 By 2023, if you still think ESG is a public good,
00:06:32.760 here's the next trick.
00:06:35.320 I said, if you still think, what's the persuasion in that?
00:06:39.920 If you still think, tell me what the persuasion trick is.
00:06:45.800 Yeah.
00:06:46.680 The trick, of course, it's the word still,
00:06:49.380 but the trick is to make somebody embarrassed that they got left behind.
00:06:56.340 Have you ever had that feeling?
00:06:58.200 Wait a minute, why does everybody know something that I don't know?
00:07:00.540 So I'm creating the impression that the smart people have already moved past you.
00:07:09.260 You don't want to be the person who got left behind
00:07:11.900 when the smart people have already moved to a better opinion, right?
00:07:15.480 It makes you automatically competitive.
00:07:18.400 So I'm creating people's, I'm stimulating their competitive juices by saying,
00:07:24.540 well, if you got left behind, you know,
00:07:28.240 and then I say, as opposed to a money-making scheme,
00:07:32.840 how hard is it to convince anybody anywhere of any persuasion
00:07:38.540 that there's something that's really a money-making scheme
00:07:42.400 and is not to their benefit?
00:07:43.540 That's the easiest thing you can convince anybody of.
00:07:48.640 You can pick anything.
00:07:50.300 Say, you know, that a Catholic church,
00:07:54.260 it's really a money-making scheme.
00:07:56.100 I'm not saying that.
00:07:56.980 I'm saying that you could pick anything
00:07:58.240 and just say it's a money-making scheme,
00:08:00.820 and the public is sort of primed to agree with that.
00:08:03.880 Wouldn't you say?
00:08:05.900 Vaccinations.
00:08:06.980 It's not to help the public.
00:08:08.640 It's a money-making scheme.
00:08:10.260 You're right.
00:08:11.300 You're right.
00:08:11.880 Right.
00:08:12.280 So people's heads are just going to bob automatically
00:08:14.600 when you say money-making scheme.
00:08:16.320 Uh-huh.
00:08:16.820 Uh-huh.
00:08:17.520 The Democrats or the Republicans, pick anybody.
00:08:20.580 They're not a real party.
00:08:22.280 They're a money-making scheme.
00:08:23.420 Uh-huh.
00:08:23.900 Uh-huh.
00:08:24.640 It's just automatic.
00:08:26.580 So I've got all the automatics in there.
00:08:28.620 I'm making you think past the sale.
00:08:30.400 I've got a high ground maneuver.
00:08:32.160 I've got a date to harden it.
00:08:33.880 I've got an alternative, so you can imagine the alternative.
00:08:38.580 And then I ended with, that's on you.
00:08:40.460 If you still think ESG is a public good, that's on you.
00:08:43.800 Because I want people to know
00:08:45.240 that they will literally be embarrassed
00:08:48.040 to hold this opinion longer.
00:08:51.340 You will be embarrassed to hold this opinion.
00:08:54.220 Now, this also very subtly gives you an out.
00:09:00.480 Because you know what triggers cognitive dissonance?
00:09:03.880 What triggers cognitive dissonance is being wrong
00:09:06.940 and then being shown to be wrong
00:09:09.280 in sort of a way that other people can notice, especially.
00:09:13.600 So I've allowed that there's something
00:09:16.260 like an evolution involved here.
00:09:18.660 It's not like you were wrong
00:09:20.060 and now I have to convince you to be right
00:09:21.940 because that would just trigger cognitive dissonance.
00:09:24.840 Instead, I'll say, you know, we're all on this path.
00:09:28.400 The path from thinking it was good
00:09:31.120 to realizing it's a money-making scheme.
00:09:33.860 So you and I, we're all the same.
00:09:36.220 You're on the path, I'm on the path.
00:09:38.280 But I'm going to take the path.
00:09:40.340 If you decide to move slower or don't take the path,
00:09:43.520 well, that would be on you.
00:09:44.920 But the path is there for all of us, right?
00:09:47.340 It's not like I'm special.
00:09:48.900 I'm not arrogant, you're dumb.
00:09:51.060 Nothing like that.
00:09:52.260 The path is there.
00:09:53.360 Just get on it.
00:09:54.020 All right, so you can see that you can pack a lot
00:09:58.360 into about 20 words or whatever that was.
00:10:01.660 And I can tell it works
00:10:03.000 because although it didn't get a lot of retweets
00:10:05.180 relative to, you know, my most retweetable stuff,
00:10:09.880 it did get over 2,200 likes,
00:10:12.060 which in my universe would be showing strong approval
00:10:15.780 for the tweet.
00:10:18.220 All right.
00:10:20.600 It also makes you research, forgot to mention.
00:10:24.020 If you can do some persuasion
00:10:26.320 that makes somebody go look it up,
00:10:28.700 that's a real winner.
00:10:31.220 Because if somebody takes the time to research
00:10:33.380 whether what you said is true
00:10:34.720 or to research any part of it,
00:10:37.080 then that becomes much stickier
00:10:39.100 than something that somebody heard
00:10:41.360 and then didn't act on with their muscles
00:10:43.780 and their brains and their actual body.
00:10:47.240 All right.
00:10:49.980 Here are two words that I would like you
00:10:53.220 to remove from your vocabulary
00:10:55.320 as much as possible.
00:10:58.360 This is not a standard which I can achieve myself.
00:11:01.720 So it's sort of like a, you know,
00:11:03.660 something to aim for,
00:11:05.740 but we can't really reach this goal.
00:11:08.880 And that is to stop using the words must and should
00:11:12.360 in terms of argument.
00:11:15.860 Must and should.
00:11:17.500 Must and should are very handy words
00:11:19.600 when you're just trying to not discuss something.
00:11:23.860 If you want to not have an argument,
00:11:26.060 just say somebody must do something,
00:11:28.000 like a child.
00:11:29.660 Nah, yeah, I don't want to hear your reasons.
00:11:31.460 You must do this.
00:11:32.980 No, you must.
00:11:34.140 Yeah, I know you have reasons,
00:11:35.140 but you must do this.
00:11:36.880 So that would be a good use of must.
00:11:39.760 Should is the same thing.
00:11:42.080 Should tries to trick you
00:11:44.440 into thinking there are reasons,
00:11:46.680 but it's just a word.
00:11:49.260 It's just a should.
00:11:51.080 So when you say should or you say must,
00:11:54.800 the first thing that goes off in my head is,
00:11:57.740 oh, you don't have an argument.
00:12:00.220 Right?
00:12:00.820 Because people don't use those words
00:12:02.740 when they have reasons.
00:12:03.680 Here's what a reason sounds like.
00:12:07.500 Oh, if you do that,
00:12:08.760 there's a high risk you'll die.
00:12:12.040 That's different than you shouldn't do that.
00:12:15.700 Right?
00:12:16.220 It's pretty different.
00:12:17.820 So don't use must and should,
00:12:19.900 or at least reduce them.
00:12:22.100 I ask this question because it's really,
00:12:26.680 I mean, in some ways,
00:12:27.500 it's the biggest question in the country,
00:12:29.460 and it's weird how little attention it gets.
00:12:32.040 At the same time, it gets lots of attention,
00:12:34.940 meaning that all the people giving it attention
00:12:36.860 live in bubbles,
00:12:39.560 and their bubbles don't collide.
00:12:42.640 So here's the question.
00:12:45.080 Do you know anybody personally,
00:12:47.800 personally,
00:12:49.120 not something you read about,
00:12:51.160 but do you know anybody personally
00:12:52.740 who you suspect,
00:12:55.540 suspect is a key word because you don't know,
00:12:57.460 do you know anybody personally
00:12:59.080 that you suspect died from a vaccination complication?
00:13:05.320 So now my Twitter followers
00:13:08.020 are anything but a random group.
00:13:11.840 They lean right.
00:13:14.840 But what percentage do you imagine,
00:13:17.360 believe that they know somebody who died,
00:13:21.460 actually died,
00:13:23.260 from a vaccination?
00:13:24.000 And the answer is 24%.
00:13:27.540 24%.
00:13:28.920 Which is roughly a quarter.
00:13:33.480 So you could round it.
00:13:34.860 Some people would round that to 25%.
00:13:36.780 But I'm not making any point about it.
00:13:39.300 I'm just saying rounds.
00:13:42.440 Now, I'm just sort of being a dick.
00:13:45.660 The 25% rule that I always joke about, 0.97
00:13:49.220 that 25% of the public
00:13:50.600 will get every poll question wrong,
00:13:52.220 doesn't matter what the question is.
00:13:54.280 There's just something magic about that number.
00:13:56.200 25% get everything wrong.
00:13:58.220 But I don't think that applies
00:14:00.460 in this particular case.
00:14:03.360 In this particular case,
00:14:05.060 I'm going to give you an exception
00:14:06.400 and not do the 25% rule
00:14:09.860 because that's just for fun.
00:14:11.520 This is actually life and death.
00:14:15.520 Now let me ask you this.
00:14:16.960 If you had never heard of vaccinations,
00:14:22.020 would you have even noticed?
00:14:26.820 Because I wonder how often people die
00:14:28.980 for reasons that they're too young.
00:14:33.640 I mean, are there that many people
00:14:35.200 dying unexpectedly?
00:14:36.360 I mean, there are lots of reasons
00:14:41.720 for extra excess deaths.
00:14:44.500 Everything from healthcare that was deferred
00:14:47.560 to people got fatter
00:14:49.120 to maybe they have a long COVID.
00:14:52.500 I don't know.
00:14:54.340 Yeah, it's the healthy ones, I say.
00:14:56.340 It's the healthy ones who are dying.
00:14:58.180 I don't know.
00:14:59.400 Here's what I can't understand.
00:15:00.800 If it's true,
00:15:04.740 imagine it's true
00:15:05.680 that something like a quarter of you
00:15:07.660 actually personally knows somebody
00:15:10.440 who died unexpectedly,
00:15:13.240 meaning they're not filled with comorbidities
00:15:16.400 at 80 years old,
00:15:17.480 that they're young
00:15:18.160 and nothing obviously wrong with them.
00:15:20.660 Don't you think that if a quarter of you
00:15:22.700 were seeing this in the real world
00:15:24.380 and it was real,
00:15:26.740 don't you think the medical community
00:15:28.400 would be more aggressive about this
00:15:30.120 or do we still believe
00:15:31.760 that they're just worried
00:15:33.420 about their paychecks
00:15:35.720 and that something of this scale
00:15:38.720 they would still ignore?
00:15:42.480 What would be the scale
00:15:43.860 at which you think
00:15:44.720 there would be a tipping point?
00:15:46.580 This is just a mental exercise.
00:15:49.300 Now, I'm not convinced
00:15:50.880 that these unexplained deaths
00:15:53.780 are vaccinated related.
00:15:55.800 I'm not convinced.
00:15:56.780 I could be.
00:15:58.260 I could be.
00:15:58.940 So let me be really clear.
00:16:00.560 If it turns out
00:16:01.400 that they are vaccination related,
00:16:04.240 don't come to me and say,
00:16:05.880 you said that wasn't the case.
00:16:07.260 I never said that.
00:16:08.740 I'm saying I don't have information
00:16:10.520 that I find compelling personally.
00:16:15.420 But there's nothing
00:16:17.100 that would rule it out.
00:16:18.540 I'm not aware of anything
00:16:19.420 that would rule it out.
00:16:20.420 Are you?
00:16:22.460 Is there anything
00:16:23.200 that would rule out
00:16:24.180 the possibility
00:16:24.840 that there is
00:16:25.620 an unusual amount
00:16:27.280 of vaccination related deaths?
00:16:28.940 I'm not aware of anything.
00:16:30.360 But I'm not aware
00:16:31.240 of anything
00:16:31.580 that confirms it either.
00:16:35.340 So,
00:16:36.600 but let me ask you this question
00:16:38.420 just hypothetically.
00:16:40.440 Suppose,
00:16:41.040 suppose 75% of you
00:16:43.560 were aware
00:16:45.880 of somebody personally
00:16:47.300 who died
00:16:48.100 probably from a vaccination.
00:16:50.220 You don't know,
00:16:50.780 but the timing suggests it.
00:16:54.260 Suppose 75%
00:16:55.560 of you were aware of it.
00:16:56.860 Do you think
00:16:57.260 that the medical community
00:16:58.460 could still say,
00:16:59.380 yeah, but paychecks?
00:17:03.120 Suppose a million people
00:17:04.600 a year started dying
00:17:05.860 unexpectedly.
00:17:07.240 Would the medical community
00:17:08.760 as a whole
00:17:09.420 still say,
00:17:10.500 mm-mm,
00:17:11.700 mm-mm,
00:17:12.940 no,
00:17:13.280 mm,
00:17:13.760 paychecks,
00:17:14.560 got to get our paychecks,
00:17:15.720 mm,
00:17:16.060 no.
00:17:16.920 Would you still see
00:17:17.880 only the rogues?
00:17:18.820 Would it still be
00:17:20.820 just, you know,
00:17:21.500 Dr. McCullough
00:17:22.240 and Dr. Malone?
00:17:24.040 Would they still be
00:17:24.640 the only ones out there?
00:17:26.540 Not the only ones.
00:17:27.640 There are other ones
00:17:28.540 out there.
00:17:30.300 But I'm just wondering
00:17:31.400 if,
00:17:31.940 do you see any tipping point?
00:17:34.220 Is there any level
00:17:35.620 at which this
00:17:37.040 suspected problem,
00:17:38.880 if the suspected part
00:17:40.280 got bigger and bigger,
00:17:41.260 is there any level
00:17:42.160 that people would go
00:17:43.840 against their
00:17:44.400 economic interest?
00:17:47.080 I don't know.
00:17:47.840 I don't know.
00:17:49.800 At some point,
00:17:50.620 even the,
00:17:51.740 you know,
00:17:52.060 the media would notice,
00:17:53.100 right?
00:17:54.340 Well,
00:17:54.860 here's the thing.
00:17:55.700 To me,
00:17:56.300 it's already
00:17:57.240 at that level
00:17:57.960 where I can't imagine
00:17:59.220 the medical community
00:18:00.420 would not have
00:18:02.460 risen at one
00:18:04.380 and said,
00:18:05.020 all right,
00:18:05.960 we're going to have
00:18:06.740 to take this seriously.
00:18:08.540 So there's something
00:18:09.420 going on here.
00:18:10.380 I don't know
00:18:10.740 exactly what it is.
00:18:11.740 It's an interesting mystery.
00:18:14.340 All right.
00:18:14.700 Let me cause
00:18:16.880 some real trouble here.
00:18:18.620 I tweeted today
00:18:19.840 to make everybody angry.
00:18:21.720 And this is based
00:18:22.320 on a bunch of stuff
00:18:23.140 I'm seeing on social media.
00:18:25.200 So this is not
00:18:25.960 Scott was sitting there
00:18:27.220 and cooked up
00:18:28.280 a new thing
00:18:29.040 to be provocative.
00:18:30.760 This is Scott
00:18:31.560 keeps seeing
00:18:32.280 the same thing
00:18:33.260 on social media.
00:18:34.220 And the same thing is
00:18:35.080 that marriage 0.65
00:18:36.680 doesn't work
00:18:37.520 because women 0.99
00:18:39.640 are incentivized
00:18:40.660 to cheat
00:18:41.740 and take your money
00:18:42.540 and leave.
00:18:42.960 And I'm seeing
00:18:44.200 women say it, 1.00
00:18:44.940 basically.
00:18:45.180 There's one woman
00:18:46.260 in particular
00:18:46.800 who's getting
00:18:47.160 a lot of retweets
00:18:48.880 or getting a lot
00:18:51.760 of attention
00:18:52.380 on mostly Instagram.
00:18:55.080 And the idea
00:18:56.320 goes like this.
00:18:59.540 Two people
00:19:00.360 are dating
00:19:00.820 and they show
00:19:02.140 each other
00:19:02.580 their best side.
00:19:03.500 so then they decide
00:19:05.440 to get married.
00:19:06.820 And as soon as
00:19:07.400 you're married
00:19:07.840 you end up
00:19:09.140 relaxing, right?
00:19:10.460 You don't,
00:19:11.080 you're not as romantic
00:19:12.440 and you have kids
00:19:15.000 and then the kids
00:19:15.640 are the priority
00:19:16.300 and you get busy
00:19:17.160 and you see each other
00:19:18.480 dirty and unwashed
00:19:20.120 and sick
00:19:21.520 and every other
00:19:22.340 bad thing.
00:19:24.240 So you've got
00:19:24.940 some challenges.
00:19:26.180 Now in the past
00:19:27.040 that was still
00:19:29.320 enough to stay married.
00:19:30.300 I don't know
00:19:30.580 if they were happy
00:19:31.120 or not
00:19:31.460 but people
00:19:32.080 more likely
00:19:33.180 stay married.
00:19:34.720 But in the modern world
00:19:36.100 the,
00:19:37.200 have I ever told you
00:19:37.920 to follow the money?
00:19:38.700 You know,
00:19:40.900 one of my most
00:19:41.700 consistent themes
00:19:42.800 is that
00:19:43.840 follow the money
00:19:44.700 works
00:19:45.360 even when you
00:19:46.860 don't think you should.
00:19:48.920 Right?
00:19:49.620 It just works
00:19:50.360 every time.
00:19:51.740 Just,
00:19:52.440 it's so consistent.
00:19:54.120 And the idea
00:19:55.220 is that
00:19:55.720 if a young woman
00:19:56.940 gets married
00:19:57.640 to a guy
00:19:58.140 who's got some money
00:19:58.900 and then she decides
00:20:00.860 to divorce him
00:20:01.620 she gets,
00:20:02.440 you know,
00:20:02.840 a portion of that money
00:20:04.040 and then she can
00:20:05.380 just go find
00:20:06.200 another guy
00:20:07.060 who's more exciting.
00:20:08.700 So she doesn't have
00:20:10.200 to stay with
00:20:10.880 a suboptable guy
00:20:12.280 when she can
00:20:13.780 take money
00:20:15.040 and improve
00:20:16.580 her situation
00:20:17.340 by just cheating
00:20:18.460 and ruining the marriage
00:20:20.120 and moving on.
00:20:22.040 Now,
00:20:23.160 and there's always
00:20:24.120 someone more exciting
00:20:25.000 because social media
00:20:26.040 makes everything,
00:20:27.620 everything possible.
00:20:30.440 Now,
00:20:31.700 here's what I think
00:20:32.640 is the biggest,
00:20:33.600 biggest fuck you 1.00
00:20:35.580 that the public
00:20:36.480 has ever given itself.
00:20:37.620 We keep blaming
00:20:39.460 each other for this.
00:20:41.900 Cut it out.
00:20:43.520 Cut it out.
00:20:44.920 Like,
00:20:45.540 if two people
00:20:46.140 have a divorce,
00:20:47.200 what do we assholes
00:20:48.180 say about them?
00:20:50.180 We're assholes.
00:20:51.420 We say,
00:20:51.940 well,
00:20:52.160 you picked wrong.
00:20:53.500 You picked wrong,
00:20:54.160 right?
00:20:54.680 It's on you.
00:20:55.300 You picked wrong.
00:20:56.780 It's not your fucking fault.
00:20:59.200 The fault is that
00:21:00.300 society is designed
00:21:02.220 to sort of
00:21:03.340 encourage you
00:21:04.180 to get into
00:21:04.720 this one kind
00:21:05.540 of arrangement
00:21:06.140 and it simply
00:21:07.400 doesn't work
00:21:08.160 in 2022
00:21:08.860 for most people.
00:21:11.100 Now,
00:21:11.440 are there people
00:21:12.240 for whom it works?
00:21:13.960 Yes.
00:21:15.340 Yes.
00:21:16.200 Can we all agree
00:21:16.860 on that?
00:21:18.020 Can we all agree
00:21:18.760 that people
00:21:19.380 are so different
00:21:20.260 that you could
00:21:21.640 pick anything
00:21:22.340 and it works
00:21:23.280 for somebody,
00:21:24.060 right?
00:21:25.820 Is there somebody
00:21:26.760 in the world
00:21:27.240 who can smoke cigarettes
00:21:28.480 every day of their life
00:21:29.480 and live to 100?
00:21:31.060 Yes.
00:21:32.180 Yes.
00:21:33.060 Does that mean
00:21:33.780 you should smoke cigarettes?
00:21:35.120 No.
00:21:36.200 No.
00:21:36.620 It means that
00:21:37.240 we're so different
00:21:38.200 everybody can find
00:21:39.980 something that works
00:21:40.780 that might not work
00:21:41.660 for you.
00:21:43.240 But,
00:21:44.160 in my opinion,
00:21:47.320 it is obvious
00:21:48.340 that marriage 0.65
00:21:49.620 doesn't work
00:21:50.220 in 2022.
00:21:51.880 It's obvious.
00:21:53.400 And I think
00:21:54.020 we all see it.
00:21:55.580 But we don't
00:21:56.360 have an option.
00:21:57.880 There's no option.
00:21:59.260 Because,
00:21:59.900 let me be very clear,
00:22:00.820 being single
00:22:01.340 isn't any good.
00:22:02.040 I've been married
00:22:04.760 and I've been single.
00:22:05.920 I can tell you
00:22:06.560 that there are
00:22:06.860 two conditions
00:22:07.480 that definitely
00:22:08.020 don't satisfy.
00:22:10.320 One is being single
00:22:11.440 and one is being married.
00:22:13.740 Those are two conditions
00:22:14.820 that absolutely
00:22:15.560 do not meet
00:22:16.620 the needs
00:22:17.140 of a modern
00:22:18.480 person
00:22:19.540 or many of us.
00:22:22.500 You know,
00:22:22.740 again,
00:22:23.420 everybody's different.
00:22:25.060 So, yes,
00:22:25.680 marriage 100%
00:22:26.720 meets the needs
00:22:27.440 of some people.
00:22:29.080 It's just
00:22:29.700 not many of them
00:22:30.660 or not enough
00:22:31.820 of them,
00:22:32.140 I guess.
00:22:33.480 Now,
00:22:34.040 I've heard a bunch
00:22:34.600 of people say,
00:22:35.120 well,
00:22:35.340 if you tweak this,
00:22:36.460 if you tweak that.
00:22:38.060 I don't think so.
00:22:39.840 I don't think so.
00:22:41.580 I,
00:22:41.820 you know,
00:22:42.680 I don't think,
00:22:43.440 you know,
00:22:45.920 I don't think
00:22:46.280 having multiple
00:22:47.080 couples works.
00:22:48.340 I don't know
00:22:48.840 anything
00:22:49.120 that works.
00:22:50.600 I'm not aware
00:22:51.220 of any method
00:22:52.020 that works
00:22:52.560 sort of generally.
00:22:53.980 and if you
00:22:56.480 were going
00:22:56.740 to design
00:22:57.300 the system
00:22:57.920 of marriage
00:22:58.380 that didn't
00:22:58.820 exist,
00:23:00.120 would you ever
00:23:00.720 have designed
00:23:01.200 this system?
00:23:03.580 I mean,
00:23:03.840 think about it.
00:23:04.740 Like,
00:23:05.060 if no one
00:23:05.840 had ever
00:23:06.320 thought of
00:23:07.400 marriage,
00:23:08.600 like it just
00:23:09.040 didn't exist,
00:23:10.460 would you
00:23:10.900 have come up
00:23:11.440 with it?
00:23:13.740 Because,
00:23:14.520 so here's
00:23:14.920 the problem.
00:23:16.300 In the old
00:23:17.000 days,
00:23:17.660 men and women
00:23:18.420 offered something
00:23:19.380 to each other
00:23:20.080 that they
00:23:21.980 couldn't do
00:23:23.420 on their own,
00:23:24.020 right?
00:23:25.020 Because if the
00:23:25.600 guy's out
00:23:26.040 farming all day,
00:23:27.380 the guy can't
00:23:28.060 have a baby,
00:23:29.900 the guy can't,
00:23:30.800 you know,
00:23:31.120 raise the baby
00:23:31.760 if he's also
00:23:32.480 farming,
00:23:33.680 you know,
00:23:33.940 so it made
00:23:35.180 complete sense
00:23:36.200 at one point.
00:23:37.160 It made
00:23:37.340 economic sense,
00:23:39.440 it made
00:23:39.960 social sense,
00:23:41.140 it made
00:23:41.420 survival sense,
00:23:42.300 it made sense
00:23:42.780 in every way.
00:23:44.160 Now you go
00:23:44.840 to 2022,
00:23:46.400 and now
00:23:46.920 the entire
00:23:48.060 last 50 years
00:23:49.480 have been
00:23:50.420 dedicated to
00:23:51.100 make individuals
00:23:51.980 not need
00:23:52.700 anybody.
00:23:53.680 Am I right?
00:23:54.860 The last 50
00:23:55.880 years of
00:23:56.420 social change
00:23:57.220 are mostly
00:23:58.440 about making
00:23:59.800 each individual
00:24:00.740 capable of
00:24:01.600 supporting themselves
00:24:02.460 in every way
00:24:03.760 that you can
00:24:04.160 support yourself.
00:24:05.340 You can get
00:24:05.800 a job,
00:24:06.480 you can get
00:24:06.840 your own
00:24:07.100 health care,
00:24:08.120 you can hire
00:24:08.740 a nanny,
00:24:09.600 you can find
00:24:12.040 friends on the
00:24:12.660 internet.
00:24:14.120 Basically,
00:24:14.900 everything you
00:24:15.660 need can be
00:24:17.600 provided in
00:24:18.240 other ways,
00:24:18.680 and society
00:24:19.340 has pushed
00:24:21.040 very hard
00:24:21.540 to make
00:24:21.880 sure that
00:24:22.220 a woman 0.57
00:24:22.600 can not
00:24:24.020 only get
00:24:24.480 married if
00:24:24.980 she wants 0.85
00:24:25.340 to,
00:24:26.840 but she
00:24:27.320 can have
00:24:27.820 as good
00:24:29.060 or a better
00:24:29.420 job than
00:24:29.940 the guy
00:24:30.240 she married.
00:24:32.220 Don't we
00:24:32.840 all agree
00:24:33.280 with that
00:24:33.740 being a good
00:24:34.300 idea?
00:24:35.260 So it's
00:24:35.820 not like
00:24:36.140 it's a bad
00:24:36.560 idea.
00:24:37.900 Is there
00:24:38.180 anybody who
00:24:38.620 thinks women 1.00
00:24:39.120 should make
00:24:39.640 less than
00:24:40.140 men for
00:24:40.580 doing the
00:24:40.960 same work?
00:24:42.160 I've never
00:24:42.800 met anybody
00:24:43.440 who had
00:24:43.680 that opinion.
00:24:44.880 Have you?
00:24:46.080 Have you ever
00:24:46.620 met anybody
00:24:47.220 who thought a
00:24:47.640 woman should be 1.00
00:24:48.220 paid less
00:24:48.700 for doing
00:24:49.120 exactly the
00:24:49.840 same job
00:24:50.260 as a man?
00:24:51.380 I've never
00:24:51.800 met one
00:24:52.280 person who
00:24:52.680 had that
00:24:52.940 opinion.
00:24:53.660 So we're
00:24:54.020 all happy
00:24:54.400 about the
00:24:54.720 changes.
00:24:58.380 All right,
00:24:59.280 so here's
00:24:59.840 Captain Hank,
00:25:00.720 and by the
00:25:01.160 way, just so
00:25:01.960 you're not
00:25:02.580 as sexist, 0.67
00:25:03.880 Hank, you
00:25:04.420 stupid cunt. 1.00
00:25:06.060 Let me say
00:25:07.080 again my
00:25:09.480 simple point.
00:25:10.340 if you
00:25:11.980 believe the
00:25:12.580 problem is
00:25:13.360 the people
00:25:14.160 chose wrong,
00:25:16.580 you are in
00:25:17.680 a serious
00:25:18.320 delusion.
00:25:19.880 It's very
00:25:20.500 obvious that
00:25:21.880 that's not
00:25:22.480 the problem.
00:25:23.540 Because if
00:25:24.220 people choosing
00:25:24.960 wrong is
00:25:26.520 part of the
00:25:27.080 system and
00:25:27.660 we can't do
00:25:28.280 it right,
00:25:28.840 that means the
00:25:29.580 system is
00:25:30.140 broken.
00:25:31.280 If people
00:25:32.020 were capable
00:25:32.620 of choosing
00:25:33.220 right, well
00:25:34.960 then I'd say,
00:25:35.680 well that's a
00:25:36.120 good system.
00:25:37.380 You take
00:25:38.100 this system
00:25:38.660 and then you
00:25:39.100 add people
00:25:39.660 to it who
00:25:40.160 can choose
00:25:40.680 correctly on
00:25:41.440 a consistent
00:25:42.160 basis.
00:25:43.080 You've got a
00:25:43.700 good system
00:25:44.180 there, Captain.
00:25:45.700 But if you
00:25:46.320 know you're
00:25:47.780 not fucking
00:25:48.460 guessing, you're
00:25:50.340 not guessing,
00:25:51.760 you know this
00:25:52.560 doesn't work for
00:25:53.220 half of the
00:25:53.720 people who try
00:25:54.320 it, at least.
00:25:55.220 I think it's
00:25:55.740 75%.
00:25:56.620 But you
00:25:58.480 know it
00:25:58.840 doesn't.
00:25:59.880 So stop
00:26:00.480 acting like the
00:26:01.780 people are
00:26:02.400 broken and the
00:26:03.660 system works.
00:26:05.600 Not true.
00:26:06.660 The system
00:26:07.680 can't work
00:26:08.720 for most
00:26:10.340 people in
00:26:10.880 2022.
00:26:12.660 And now,
00:26:13.580 because some
00:26:14.180 of you will
00:26:15.560 not be able to
00:26:16.260 handle this
00:26:16.820 point, I have
00:26:18.020 to keep saying
00:26:18.840 it can
00:26:19.760 definitely work
00:26:20.800 for some
00:26:21.300 of you.
00:26:23.260 And I know
00:26:24.080 that no matter
00:26:24.620 how many times
00:26:25.280 I say it
00:26:25.880 definitely is
00:26:26.680 perfect for
00:26:27.320 some of you,
00:26:28.900 the argument
00:26:29.580 will be,
00:26:31.340 but it works
00:26:32.020 for me.
00:26:34.700 No, that's
00:26:35.500 not an
00:26:35.840 argument.
00:26:36.660 The fact
00:26:38.860 that it
00:26:39.100 works for
00:26:39.480 you doesn't
00:26:40.200 really conflict
00:26:42.140 with my
00:26:42.560 point at
00:26:43.000 all.
00:26:43.640 Not at
00:26:43.980 all.
00:26:45.200 Not at
00:26:45.580 all.
00:26:45.740 It's
00:26:45.860 completely
00:26:46.240 compatible
00:26:46.680 with my
00:26:47.120 point.
00:26:47.860 It works
00:26:48.440 for some
00:26:49.080 of you.
00:26:50.020 Now, why
00:26:50.860 does this
00:26:51.280 illusion persist?
00:26:52.220 would you
00:26:54.300 would you like
00:26:54.500 me to give
00:26:55.420 you a 0.57
00:26:56.020 demonstration
00:26:56.540 right now
00:26:57.280 why this
00:26:58.500 illusion
00:26:58.900 persists
00:26:59.560 despite the
00:27:01.480 obviousness of
00:27:02.460 it being
00:27:02.800 false?
00:27:03.760 I'm going to
00:27:04.180 give you a
00:27:04.800 working model
00:27:06.500 of it right
00:27:07.000 now.
00:27:08.180 Married
00:27:08.620 men,
00:27:09.760 married men,
00:27:11.220 just the
00:27:11.740 married men,
00:27:13.100 tell me if
00:27:13.740 you're happy in
00:27:14.380 your marriage.
00:27:15.260 Go.
00:27:15.420 Go.
00:27:17.320 Married men,
00:27:18.540 are you happy in
00:27:19.240 your marriage?
00:27:21.220 A lot of
00:27:21.840 yeses.
00:27:22.860 Look at all
00:27:23.340 those yeses.
00:27:24.520 Now, some
00:27:24.820 people said no,
00:27:25.960 but overwhelmingly,
00:27:27.560 yes, yes, yes,
00:27:28.460 yes, yes, yes,
00:27:29.540 yes, yes, yes,
00:27:29.980 yes, yes, yes,
00:27:30.680 yes, yes, yes,
00:27:31.300 yes, yes, yes.
00:27:33.140 Have I ever
00:27:33.900 mentioned that
00:27:34.420 all men are 0.99
00:27:34.860 liars?
00:27:37.600 Here's another
00:27:38.340 meme that's
00:27:39.280 going around
00:27:39.680 the internet.
00:27:41.700 If, as a
00:27:42.520 woman, you 1.00
00:27:43.380 force your
00:27:44.180 man to lie
00:27:44.860 to you,
00:27:45.880 he will do
00:27:46.480 what he needs
00:27:47.080 to do to
00:27:47.620 survive.
00:27:49.240 And they're
00:27:49.940 doing it
00:27:50.300 right now.
00:27:51.240 They're all
00:27:52.000 fucking lying
00:27:52.640 to you in
00:27:53.120 public.
00:27:54.600 Again, let
00:27:55.840 me adjust.
00:27:56.860 Some of
00:27:57.380 you, some
00:27:58.800 of you are
00:27:59.340 genuinely
00:27:59.880 happy.
00:28:01.060 Some of
00:28:01.640 you picked
00:28:02.040 the right
00:28:02.420 people.
00:28:03.220 For some
00:28:04.060 of you,
00:28:04.520 marriage is
00:28:04.960 perfect.
00:28:05.640 Are we
00:28:06.080 okay?
00:28:06.420 Have I
00:28:06.660 stipulated
00:28:07.160 that again
00:28:07.660 every one
00:28:08.300 minute?
00:28:09.060 Because you
00:28:09.480 can't have
00:28:09.880 this conversation
00:28:10.580 unless you
00:28:11.060 stipulate that
00:28:11.900 every fucking
00:28:13.140 one minute.
00:28:14.140 Let me do
00:28:14.520 it again.
00:28:15.360 Let me
00:28:15.640 stipulate.
00:28:16.200 Some people,
00:28:17.540 some few
00:28:18.200 people,
00:28:18.600 marriage is
00:28:19.020 perfect.
00:28:20.080 Don't use
00:28:20.700 that argument
00:28:21.260 for the rest
00:28:22.000 of us.
00:28:23.440 Don't use
00:28:24.000 that argument
00:28:24.440 for the rest
00:28:24.900 of us.
00:28:25.580 Do you know
00:28:25.860 what is good
00:28:26.340 for some
00:28:27.040 people?
00:28:27.760 Sucking a
00:28:28.420 dick. 0.90
00:28:29.600 For some
00:28:30.360 people,
00:28:30.820 sucking a
00:28:31.360 dick is a
00:28:31.940 great day.
00:28:33.540 It just
00:28:34.300 isn't for
00:28:34.740 everybody.
00:28:35.860 Okay?
00:28:36.860 So, no
00:28:37.680 matter how
00:28:38.140 much you
00:28:38.500 love sucking 0.59
00:28:39.000 a dick, 0.99
00:28:40.000 and I'm
00:28:40.320 okay with
00:28:40.700 that, by
00:28:40.980 the way.
00:28:41.320 I'm not,
00:28:42.700 I'm not,
00:28:43.560 it's not a
00:28:44.200 criticism.
00:28:45.120 I'm just
00:28:45.700 saying that
00:28:46.080 people are
00:28:46.420 different.
00:28:47.180 Right?
00:28:47.340 If that's
00:28:48.460 your thing,
00:28:49.300 do not
00:28:50.060 argue that
00:28:50.680 it's my
00:28:51.120 thing and
00:28:51.580 everybody else's
00:28:52.200 thing because
00:28:52.740 you love it
00:28:53.160 so much.
00:28:54.300 All right?
00:28:54.860 Same with
00:28:55.420 marriage.
00:28:56.460 It's just
00:28:57.040 like sucking 0.98
00:28:57.540 a dick. 0.94
00:28:58.760 It's something
00:28:59.700 that works
00:29:00.160 great for
00:29:01.860 some people.
00:29:03.020 It's just
00:29:03.640 not an
00:29:03.940 argument for
00:29:04.400 everybody else.
00:29:07.160 All right.
00:29:07.460 And, let's
00:29:13.200 see.
00:29:14.420 So, I
00:29:14.700 think men
00:29:15.000 are lying
00:29:15.480 about how
00:29:16.440 happy they
00:29:16.920 are, and
00:29:17.360 also there's
00:29:17.860 some, you
00:29:19.920 know, cognitive
00:29:20.540 dissonance that
00:29:21.340 goes into
00:29:21.700 there.
00:29:22.420 But I also
00:29:23.040 think men
00:29:23.480 are easier
00:29:23.880 to please.
00:29:25.340 Let me
00:29:25.920 give you,
00:29:27.060 all right,
00:29:27.560 I'm just
00:29:27.900 going to
00:29:28.120 say it.
00:29:29.720 I'm just
00:29:30.260 going to
00:29:30.480 say it.
00:29:32.000 You know,
00:29:32.440 you always
00:29:33.160 think to
00:29:33.480 yourself,
00:29:34.160 how honest
00:29:34.980 do you
00:29:35.220 want to
00:29:35.480 be?
00:29:35.660 So, I'm
00:29:39.380 going to
00:29:39.480 be a
00:29:39.740 little extra
00:29:40.300 honest.
00:29:40.920 It's my
00:29:41.340 belief, after
00:29:42.460 living a
00:29:44.160 lifetime, that
00:29:45.880 evolution has
00:29:46.800 created a
00:29:48.060 situation in
00:29:48.880 which the
00:29:50.540 most natural
00:29:51.660 arrangement for
00:29:52.520 a man and
00:29:53.000 woman is a 1.00
00:29:54.700 woman who 0.99
00:29:55.300 cannot be
00:29:56.020 pleased, and
00:29:57.660 a man who
00:29:58.380 doesn't know
00:29:59.060 that she
00:29:59.800 cannot be
00:30:00.420 pleased.
00:30:01.340 And he's
00:30:01.700 pretty sure
00:30:02.160 that the
00:30:02.520 next thing
00:30:02.940 he does is
00:30:03.440 going to
00:30:03.660 get it
00:30:03.920 done.
00:30:04.140 Because men
00:30:06.040 are perpetually
00:30:08.200 fooled by
00:30:09.660 women who 0.99
00:30:10.200 say, if you
00:30:10.680 give me one
00:30:11.160 more thing,
00:30:11.620 I'll be
00:30:11.860 happy.
00:30:12.740 If you
00:30:13.160 just do
00:30:13.500 this one
00:30:13.880 thing.
00:30:14.880 I got one
00:30:15.700 complaint.
00:30:16.900 I just
00:30:17.280 have one
00:30:17.660 problem.
00:30:18.460 Seriously,
00:30:18.940 just one
00:30:19.340 problem.
00:30:20.080 If you
00:30:20.400 could fix
00:30:20.780 this one
00:30:21.180 problem,
00:30:21.760 well, thank
00:30:22.220 you.
00:30:22.460 Thank you
00:30:22.860 for fixing
00:30:23.380 that one
00:30:23.780 problem.
00:30:24.800 Well, I
00:30:25.080 have this
00:30:25.360 other
00:30:25.540 problem.
00:30:27.660 All right.
00:30:28.380 Now, let
00:30:30.280 me be really
00:30:31.200 clear.
00:30:31.580 am I
00:30:33.660 telling you
00:30:34.080 there's
00:30:34.320 something
00:30:34.600 wrong with
00:30:35.380 women? 1.00
00:30:36.860 No.
00:30:38.020 Nope.
00:30:38.700 I'm telling
00:30:39.240 you that I
00:30:39.740 believe that
00:30:41.380 we evolve
00:30:42.060 this way for
00:30:43.280 the best
00:30:44.500 possible reason,
00:30:45.740 that it
00:30:46.460 seems to be
00:30:47.120 supportive of
00:30:48.000 having children.
00:30:50.120 It seems to
00:30:51.180 help us
00:30:51.760 survive as a
00:30:53.180 species.
00:30:53.520 But if
00:30:57.480 you don't
00:30:57.800 see the
00:30:58.220 world in
00:30:58.880 those terms,
00:30:59.800 you're sort
00:31:00.660 of living in
00:31:01.120 a dream
00:31:01.480 world.
00:31:04.800 Now, why
00:31:06.540 does a
00:31:06.880 marriage sometimes
00:31:07.700 work if
00:31:08.620 there's a
00:31:09.000 woman who 0.99
00:31:09.400 can never
00:31:09.820 be happy,
00:31:11.060 and there's
00:31:11.460 a man who
00:31:11.960 is continually
00:31:12.860 fooled into
00:31:15.180 thinking he
00:31:15.800 can make it
00:31:16.320 work?
00:31:17.660 Why are
00:31:18.840 some people
00:31:19.260 still happy?
00:31:20.420 And the
00:31:20.760 answer is
00:31:21.360 everybody's
00:31:23.180 really different.
00:31:25.020 Some people
00:31:25.520 like that.
00:31:26.880 For some
00:31:27.480 people, that's
00:31:28.040 a perfect
00:31:28.400 situation.
00:31:30.040 Have you
00:31:30.380 not met
00:31:30.900 men who
00:31:32.180 are happier
00:31:32.680 giving than
00:31:33.420 receiving?
00:31:35.540 Am I
00:31:36.160 wrong?
00:31:37.100 You've met
00:31:37.680 men who
00:31:38.100 are happier
00:31:38.500 giving than
00:31:39.040 receiving, so
00:31:39.680 they're just
00:31:40.040 always giving,
00:31:41.140 and that's
00:31:41.560 just a good
00:31:41.960 situation for
00:31:42.620 them.
00:31:43.380 There's
00:31:43.580 nothing wrong
00:31:44.020 with that.
00:31:45.160 Again, I'm
00:31:45.960 not criticizing.
00:31:47.460 If you heard
00:31:47.880 anything in
00:31:49.520 any of this
00:31:50.120 that sounds
00:31:50.500 like,
00:31:50.780 me picking
00:31:51.840 out somebody
00:31:52.440 and criticizing
00:31:53.140 them, I
00:31:53.920 haven't done
00:31:54.280 that.
00:31:55.440 I'm talking
00:31:55.860 about the
00:31:56.240 system is
00:31:56.920 broken, the
00:31:58.140 people are
00:31:58.560 good.
00:31:59.480 In fact, it's
00:32:00.060 the opposite
00:32:00.500 of criticism.
00:32:01.760 I'm saying
00:32:02.320 the people
00:32:02.760 are fine, the
00:32:04.720 system is
00:32:05.320 broken, but
00:32:06.860 you can't
00:32:07.480 see this
00:32:07.920 obvious fact
00:32:08.900 because all
00:32:09.960 of the men
00:32:10.440 involved in
00:32:11.000 the system
00:32:11.460 are lying,
00:32:12.620 because lying
00:32:13.400 is what keeps
00:32:14.020 the system
00:32:14.480 working.
00:32:15.560 You have to
00:32:15.960 sort of lie
00:32:16.380 to yourself
00:32:16.840 that this
00:32:17.240 is okay to
00:32:18.480 be in it.
00:32:20.780 So, that's
00:32:23.040 my cheerful
00:32:24.540 love.
00:32:26.620 And to be
00:32:27.800 clear, I'm
00:32:28.300 not aware of
00:32:28.760 any alternative
00:32:29.400 that's better
00:32:30.000 than marriage.
00:32:32.500 So let me
00:32:33.220 end on the
00:32:33.920 positive.
00:32:35.020 I don't know
00:32:35.560 anything that's
00:32:35.900 better.
00:32:36.720 Do you?
00:32:37.840 If you do,
00:32:39.160 I'd be sort of
00:32:40.100 curious about
00:32:40.620 that.
00:32:40.820 All right.
00:32:46.740 I heard from
00:32:47.280 a marriage
00:32:47.660 counselor who
00:32:49.440 saw my tweet
00:32:50.600 and said,
00:32:51.120 as a marriage
00:32:51.620 counselor who
00:32:52.240 teaches the
00:32:53.020 Gottman method,
00:32:54.500 now the
00:32:54.840 Gottman method
00:32:55.440 I don't know
00:32:55.880 much about,
00:32:56.420 but there was
00:32:56.720 a little chart
00:32:57.280 involved.
00:32:58.320 I guess the
00:32:58.920 chart involves
00:33:00.040 teaching couples
00:33:01.580 to act
00:33:02.080 differently.
00:33:03.780 So it's
00:33:04.260 basically a set
00:33:05.100 of things like
00:33:05.740 in this
00:33:06.120 situation,
00:33:07.420 do more of
00:33:08.100 this and
00:33:08.500 less of that.
00:33:09.200 So it's a
00:33:13.660 set of
00:33:14.180 steps that
00:33:15.460 if everybody
00:33:15.920 just followed
00:33:16.680 these simple
00:33:17.580 guidelines,
00:33:18.240 they'd have
00:33:18.540 better marriages.
00:33:20.120 And so this
00:33:20.540 marriage counselor
00:33:21.140 teaches the
00:33:21.740 Gottman method
00:33:22.340 with success.
00:33:24.000 He says he
00:33:25.500 has an unfair
00:33:26.100 advantage of
00:33:26.800 knowing that
00:33:27.980 I'm wrong,
00:33:29.400 and he'd
00:33:29.900 encourage me to
00:33:30.640 look and learn
00:33:31.560 more about the
00:33:32.220 structure and
00:33:32.980 function of
00:33:33.460 marriage so
00:33:33.900 that if you
00:33:34.400 did these
00:33:35.220 steps, you
00:33:36.300 would do
00:33:36.780 better.
00:33:38.200 And
00:33:38.640 I tweeted
00:33:40.380 back, I
00:33:41.040 said, you've
00:33:41.880 met women
00:33:42.420 who are
00:33:42.700 willing to
00:33:43.160 change their
00:33:43.680 behavior?
00:33:46.060 Have any
00:33:46.680 of you seen
00:33:47.440 that?
00:33:48.920 Have you ever
00:33:49.540 met a woman
00:33:49.940 who was willing
00:33:50.400 to change
00:33:50.800 their behavior?
00:33:53.040 I mean,
00:33:53.660 seriously, I'm
00:33:54.220 not, and
00:33:54.660 again, if this
00:33:56.000 sounds like a
00:33:57.280 sexist thing,
00:33:58.520 I don't mean it
00:33:59.240 that way.
00:34:00.160 I mean, I've
00:34:00.860 never seen it.
00:34:02.320 I'm not saying
00:34:03.100 it's good or
00:34:03.640 bad, I've just
00:34:04.820 never seen it.
00:34:05.860 Have you?
00:34:06.200 Have you?
00:34:08.640 I saw one
00:34:11.520 yes.
00:34:13.720 But most
00:34:14.360 people are
00:34:14.720 saying they've
00:34:15.080 never seen
00:34:15.520 it.
00:34:16.840 All right.
00:34:17.440 So some of
00:34:17.980 you believe
00:34:18.340 you've seen
00:34:18.680 it.
00:34:20.220 Oh, I've
00:34:20.740 seen a bunch
00:34:21.160 of yeses.
00:34:22.500 You've
00:34:22.920 actually seen
00:34:23.460 people change
00:34:24.120 their basic
00:34:24.660 behavior.
00:34:27.920 What would
00:34:28.480 that look
00:34:28.820 like?
00:34:30.360 Let's say,
00:34:31.180 let's take an
00:34:31.740 example.
00:34:32.180 Let's say the
00:34:34.200 basic behavior
00:34:35.020 is nagging
00:34:37.780 too much.
00:34:39.000 Very sexist
00:34:40.200 kind of a
00:34:41.000 statement.
00:34:41.640 But let's
00:34:42.200 say it's
00:34:42.460 that.
00:34:43.600 That the
00:34:44.220 wife, let's 1.00
00:34:45.380 say the
00:34:45.580 problem is
00:34:45.980 the wife
00:34:46.340 complains
00:34:47.120 too much
00:34:47.740 about things
00:34:48.720 that are
00:34:48.960 not that
00:34:49.440 important.
00:34:50.740 And let's
00:34:51.060 say that
00:34:52.040 that woman 1.00
00:34:52.540 learns that
00:34:54.920 that's a
00:34:55.640 toxic behavior
00:34:56.800 and agrees
00:34:58.560 to it.
00:34:59.160 Yeah, that
00:34:59.500 is a toxic
00:35:00.040 behavior.
00:35:00.840 So that the
00:35:01.620 woman stops 0.89
00:35:02.340 complaining about
00:35:03.700 things which
00:35:04.400 bother her. 0.99
00:35:05.840 Everything's
00:35:06.320 good now?
00:35:06.780 Problem fixed.
00:35:09.240 In what
00:35:09.900 world does
00:35:10.400 that fix
00:35:10.780 anything?
00:35:11.680 Because
00:35:12.160 whatever it
00:35:12.700 is that
00:35:13.080 makes the
00:35:13.560 woman unhappy
00:35:14.800 or complain
00:35:15.460 doesn't change,
00:35:16.380 does it?
00:35:17.800 If she still
00:35:18.680 feels unhappy
00:35:19.760 or unsatisfied
00:35:21.840 or whatever,
00:35:22.400 isn't she
00:35:22.740 going to act
00:35:23.900 that way?
00:35:25.260 One way or
00:35:26.000 another.
00:35:26.600 I mean, to
00:35:26.900 me it feels
00:35:27.320 like you're
00:35:28.580 blocking one
00:35:30.760 hole but
00:35:31.300 another hole
00:35:31.900 gets created.
00:35:33.240 reframing,
00:35:36.620 maybe some
00:35:37.040 reframing
00:35:37.460 helps.
00:35:38.560 Anyway,
00:35:39.480 let's talk
00:35:39.840 about Twitter,
00:35:40.340 that's more
00:35:40.680 fun.
00:35:42.000 Did you see
00:35:42.500 the prank,
00:35:43.380 I fell for it
00:35:44.100 too,
00:35:44.420 of the two
00:35:45.780 pranksters who
00:35:46.640 pretended to be
00:35:47.580 Twitter employees
00:35:48.820 who had been
00:35:49.220 fired?
00:35:50.280 And they
00:35:50.500 stood outside,
00:35:51.260 I guess they
00:35:51.720 stood outside
00:35:52.460 the Twitter
00:35:53.500 headquarters with
00:35:54.280 their boxes
00:35:54.860 like they were
00:35:56.000 leaving?
00:35:56.300 and they
00:35:58.040 gave themselves
00:35:58.580 fake names
00:35:59.780 of Ligma
00:36:02.860 and Johnson,
00:36:03.900 their last
00:36:04.260 names.
00:36:05.760 And I guess
00:36:06.440 they're like
00:36:07.200 pranksters.
00:36:09.440 And one of
00:36:11.080 them got
00:36:11.240 interviewed,
00:36:11.740 I saw the
00:36:12.220 interview.
00:36:14.480 And what
00:36:15.160 made it a
00:36:15.680 great prank
00:36:16.360 is that,
00:36:18.780 so here's the
00:36:19.360 key to a
00:36:19.760 great prank.
00:36:20.620 A great
00:36:21.160 prank has
00:36:22.900 to include
00:36:23.580 at least one
00:36:24.500 indicator that
00:36:25.360 it's a
00:36:25.660 prank.
00:36:26.960 But the
00:36:27.520 indicator that
00:36:28.260 it's a
00:36:28.520 prank has
00:36:29.060 to be
00:36:29.400 invisible to
00:36:30.700 the person
00:36:31.160 you're
00:36:31.600 pranking,
00:36:32.580 but not
00:36:33.460 to the
00:36:33.880 observers.
00:36:35.500 You got
00:36:35.800 that?
00:36:36.300 In other
00:36:36.580 words,
00:36:36.780 it had to
00:36:37.000 be something
00:36:37.400 that the
00:36:37.840 media would
00:36:38.420 accept,
00:36:39.580 but that
00:36:40.280 you as
00:36:40.680 the audience
00:36:41.180 would go,
00:36:41.800 did they
00:36:42.140 fall for
00:36:42.500 that?
00:36:43.540 And here's
00:36:43.960 the statement
00:36:44.460 that one of
00:36:45.280 the pranksters
00:36:45.780 said when he
00:36:46.360 was being
00:36:46.640 interviewed.
00:36:47.380 At the
00:36:47.680 end of the
00:36:48.000 interview,
00:36:48.500 when he
00:36:48.900 was saying
00:36:49.320 how he
00:36:50.140 felt about
00:36:50.520 getting fired,
00:36:51.180 I guess,
00:36:52.120 he goes,
00:36:53.020 all right,
00:36:53.400 I gotta go,
00:36:54.080 I have to
00:36:54.380 touch bases with
00:36:55.620 my husband
00:36:56.120 and wife.
00:37:01.100 All right,
00:37:01.800 no,
00:37:02.220 you fucking 0.93
00:37:02.740 asshole, 0.97
00:37:03.500 J.M.
00:37:03.920 Ramsey.
00:37:05.240 All right,
00:37:05.780 how many more
00:37:06.600 fucking times
00:37:07.460 can I tell you
00:37:08.200 if you're
00:37:08.960 blaming who
00:37:09.780 somebody picked,
00:37:11.380 you are just
00:37:12.000 living in your
00:37:12.620 own little
00:37:13.060 illusion there,
00:37:14.460 right?
00:37:15.540 Like,
00:37:16.280 could you hear
00:37:17.040 that any
00:37:17.660 clearer?
00:37:18.440 It doesn't
00:37:19.080 matter who
00:37:19.540 you picked.
00:37:20.320 And let me
00:37:20.740 say something
00:37:21.220 that will
00:37:21.620 amaze you,
00:37:22.980 because I
00:37:23.360 know you're
00:37:23.680 all trying to
00:37:24.820 guess about
00:37:25.420 my relationship.
00:37:26.580 The difference
00:37:27.340 in our ages
00:37:28.180 literally never
00:37:29.380 came up.
00:37:30.880 I know that's
00:37:31.500 weird,
00:37:32.440 but if you
00:37:33.340 were to look
00:37:33.700 at causes of
00:37:34.840 divorce,
00:37:35.280 I don't think
00:37:35.940 it was ever,
00:37:37.160 even indirectly,
00:37:38.200 believe it or
00:37:39.180 not,
00:37:40.160 believe it or
00:37:40.720 not,
00:37:41.040 even indirectly,
00:37:42.000 it never
00:37:42.300 became an
00:37:42.780 issue that
00:37:43.180 I'm aware of.
00:37:44.700 I mean,
00:37:44.980 it should have,
00:37:46.160 you know,
00:37:46.440 common sense
00:37:47.240 says it would
00:37:47.740 have,
00:37:48.320 but did I
00:37:48.840 tell you
00:37:49.240 earlier that
00:37:50.020 everybody's
00:37:50.560 different?
00:37:52.780 Everybody's
00:37:53.400 different.
00:37:54.600 That thing
00:37:55.240 that would
00:37:55.600 have been
00:37:55.880 an obvious
00:37:56.660 problem for
00:37:57.360 almost anybody
00:37:58.260 else was
00:37:59.500 less of a
00:38:00.100 problem for
00:38:00.620 us.
00:38:01.560 It's just,
00:38:01.920 you know,
00:38:02.080 other stuff.
00:38:04.580 So no
00:38:05.580 matter how
00:38:05.940 many times I
00:38:06.500 say that
00:38:06.880 people are
00:38:07.280 different,
00:38:08.200 you're still
00:38:08.740 going to
00:38:08.940 say you
00:38:09.220 picked the
00:38:09.580 wrong person
00:38:10.160 because I
00:38:11.620 think maybe
00:38:12.020 that's part
00:38:12.420 of cognitive
00:38:12.940 dissonance
00:38:13.460 or some
00:38:13.780 sort of
00:38:14.000 confirmation
00:38:14.400 bias so 0.95
00:38:15.540 that you
00:38:15.860 can justify
00:38:17.180 your own
00:38:17.760 situation.
00:38:19.400 All right,
00:38:19.640 but the
00:38:19.880 Twitter pranksters
00:38:20.500 are pretty
00:38:20.800 funny.
00:38:21.760 Now,
00:38:21.980 people seem
00:38:22.440 to be getting
00:38:22.900 back on
00:38:23.920 Twitter who
00:38:25.700 had been
00:38:26.300 temporarily
00:38:27.420 banned,
00:38:28.660 but we
00:38:29.460 don't think
00:38:29.940 that is
00:38:30.240 necessarily
00:38:30.680 because of
00:38:31.340 Elon Musk.
00:38:32.120 Musk.
00:38:33.000 So,
00:38:33.500 for example,
00:38:35.040 Ye is
00:38:35.620 back on
00:38:36.080 Twitter,
00:38:37.180 and Musk
00:38:38.380 had to
00:38:38.800 confirm that
00:38:39.380 he didn't
00:38:39.720 do that.
00:38:40.440 That was
00:38:40.820 just an
00:38:41.280 automatic
00:38:41.700 thing.
00:38:42.160 It was
00:38:42.360 like a
00:38:42.680 two-week
00:38:42.980 suspension
00:38:43.480 that he
00:38:43.940 got put
00:38:44.280 back on.
00:38:45.080 So the
00:38:45.740 timing was
00:38:46.280 coincidental,
00:38:47.220 but people
00:38:47.580 think that
00:38:48.260 Elon Musk
00:38:48.900 put Ye back
00:38:49.620 on Twitter,
00:38:50.460 but that
00:38:50.720 did not
00:38:51.120 happen.
00:38:51.460 That's
00:38:51.640 fake news.
00:38:52.220 But then
00:38:54.340 Cat Turd
00:38:55.260 is back
00:38:55.660 on,
00:38:56.740 and also
00:38:57.340 Marjorie
00:38:58.060 Taylor Greene.
00:38:59.340 So those
00:38:59.720 are two
00:39:00.040 people who
00:39:00.520 have been,
00:39:01.360 I don't
00:39:02.000 know what
00:39:02.240 the right
00:39:02.500 word is,
00:39:04.060 temporarily
00:39:05.080 banned or
00:39:06.060 something,
00:39:06.560 whatever the
00:39:07.000 word is.
00:39:08.540 I think
00:39:08.880 maybe their
00:39:09.320 bans just
00:39:09.880 ran out,
00:39:10.980 or maybe
00:39:11.340 they deleted
00:39:11.880 the tweets
00:39:12.360 so they
00:39:12.660 could get
00:39:12.920 back on,
00:39:13.440 whatever it
00:39:13.760 was.
00:39:14.620 But here's
00:39:15.500 the weirdest
00:39:15.920 thing in
00:39:16.320 the world.
00:39:17.800 You all
00:39:18.180 know the
00:39:18.480 Twitter user
00:39:19.680 Cat Turd,
00:39:21.580 who's got
00:39:22.060 over a
00:39:22.540 million users.
00:39:24.300 And he's
00:39:24.960 just a
00:39:25.620 clever pundit
00:39:26.500 who's built
00:39:27.320 quite an
00:39:28.160 audience.
00:39:30.040 I don't
00:39:30.360 follow him.
00:39:30.940 I blocked
00:39:31.420 him a long
00:39:31.780 time ago
00:39:32.120 for being
00:39:32.460 a dick. 0.94
00:39:32.980 I forget
00:39:33.260 why.
00:39:34.360 But Marjorie
00:39:35.680 Taylor Greene
00:39:36.720 retweeted
00:39:38.680 Cat Turd
00:39:39.260 and said,
00:39:40.560 you're almost
00:39:41.020 to one
00:39:41.560 million users
00:39:42.420 ever since
00:39:43.300 Elon Musk
00:39:43.960 took the
00:39:44.600 shadow bands
00:39:45.200 off.
00:39:46.100 And then
00:39:46.420 she says,
00:39:46.940 I'll host
00:39:47.400 a hashtag
00:39:48.720 turd stock
00:39:49.480 after the
00:39:49.960 party.
00:39:50.880 Turd stock.
00:39:52.060 So here's
00:39:52.680 a representative
00:39:53.400 of the
00:39:53.800 government
00:39:54.140 who first
00:39:55.240 of all
00:39:55.520 is spreading
00:39:56.800 some fake
00:39:57.380 news because
00:39:58.480 Elon Musk
00:39:59.140 did not
00:39:59.620 remove any
00:40:00.200 shadow bands.
00:40:01.880 But she's 0.97
00:40:02.700 a member of
00:40:03.160 Congress and
00:40:03.740 she's telling
00:40:04.200 you that
00:40:04.500 that happened.
00:40:05.060 That didn't
00:40:05.360 happen.
00:40:06.120 That's fake
00:40:06.540 news.
00:40:08.080 But she's 0.97
00:40:08.880 also offering
00:40:09.900 to host
00:40:10.480 turd stock.
00:40:12.880 This is the
00:40:13.720 greatest week
00:40:14.400 ever.
00:40:16.020 I don't
00:40:16.540 think I
00:40:16.840 can enjoy
00:40:17.460 a week of
00:40:18.700 news more
00:40:19.420 than this
00:40:19.840 week.
00:40:20.160 I don't
00:40:21.340 really have
00:40:21.720 a comment
00:40:22.940 or observation
00:40:23.740 about this.
00:40:24.920 I just
00:40:25.340 think it's
00:40:25.840 the greatest
00:40:26.240 world where
00:40:27.220 Representative
00:40:28.680 Marjorie
00:40:29.340 Taylor Greene
00:40:30.040 can retweak
00:40:31.460 cat turd
00:40:32.140 and offer
00:40:32.760 to host
00:40:33.380 turd stock.
00:40:35.400 I want to
00:40:36.560 live in this
00:40:36.960 world.
00:40:38.160 I want to
00:40:38.700 live in this
00:40:39.160 world.
00:40:42.140 All right.
00:40:44.040 Stocks were
00:40:44.880 up yesterday
00:40:46.820 quite sharply.
00:40:50.160 Was that
00:40:50.660 the Twitter
00:40:52.540 Elon Musk
00:40:53.360 effect?
00:40:54.880 Was there
00:40:55.240 something else
00:40:55.860 that made
00:40:56.140 the stock
00:40:56.540 market go
00:40:57.020 up on
00:40:57.540 Friday?
00:40:59.680 GDP report,
00:41:00.920 Apple earnings.
00:41:02.680 Was that
00:41:03.300 it?
00:41:04.040 But we
00:41:04.540 were expecting
00:41:05.040 the GDP
00:41:05.640 report.
00:41:06.460 We already
00:41:07.060 knew about
00:41:07.480 the GDP
00:41:07.960 report,
00:41:08.560 right?
00:41:09.780 I thought
00:41:10.400 we knew
00:41:10.740 that was
00:41:11.080 going to
00:41:11.280 come in
00:41:11.580 strong and
00:41:12.220 roughly how
00:41:12.700 strong it
00:41:13.140 would come
00:41:13.400 in.
00:41:14.560 Yeah,
00:41:14.980 I don't
00:41:15.080 know.
00:41:17.180 2.6,
00:41:18.280 is that
00:41:18.640 enough to
00:41:19.080 raise the
00:41:19.620 that was
00:41:20.540 exactly what
00:41:21.200 we expected,
00:41:21.860 right?
00:41:22.300 So it
00:41:22.820 feels like
00:41:23.200 that was
00:41:23.480 already
00:41:23.740 baked in.
00:41:25.320 Here's
00:41:25.780 what I
00:41:26.040 think.
00:41:27.060 I think
00:41:27.480 that markets
00:41:28.060 move,
00:41:28.820 we think
00:41:29.580 they move
00:41:30.080 on the
00:41:31.180 news,
00:41:32.560 but if
00:41:33.340 they did
00:41:33.760 move on
00:41:34.200 the news,
00:41:34.820 everybody
00:41:35.240 would be
00:41:35.680 able to
00:41:36.000 guess what
00:41:37.080 the market
00:41:37.500 would do.
00:41:38.640 You got
00:41:39.320 that right?
00:41:40.820 There's a
00:41:41.440 whole industry
00:41:42.060 based on
00:41:42.620 people saying
00:41:43.400 smart things
00:41:44.100 about why
00:41:44.700 the market
00:41:45.180 did what
00:41:45.660 it did.
00:41:45.980 And the
00:41:47.340 reason there's
00:41:47.800 a big market
00:41:48.360 for it is
00:41:49.080 that they
00:41:49.320 don't all
00:41:49.780 say the
00:41:50.160 same thing.
00:41:51.440 If they
00:41:52.000 all said
00:41:52.260 the same
00:41:52.580 thing,
00:41:53.020 then there
00:41:53.420 wouldn't be
00:41:53.660 a market
00:41:54.000 for it.
00:41:54.400 It would
00:41:54.460 just be
00:41:54.720 everybody
00:41:55.440 would know
00:41:55.840 what's
00:41:56.060 happening.
00:41:57.100 But the
00:41:58.240 financial market
00:41:59.040 is mostly
00:41:59.740 a gigantic
00:42:00.500 scam in
00:42:02.200 which people
00:42:02.740 pretend to
00:42:03.460 tell you they
00:42:04.000 know why
00:42:04.480 markets did
00:42:05.260 move or
00:42:05.880 have.
00:42:06.680 When they
00:42:07.200 get it
00:42:07.500 right,
00:42:08.020 they say,
00:42:08.680 well,
00:42:08.900 look there.
00:42:10.020 Because remember,
00:42:10.640 a market is
00:42:11.180 only going to
00:42:11.640 do two things.
00:42:12.940 It will go
00:42:13.460 up or it
00:42:14.720 will go down.
00:42:16.440 Whichever way
00:42:17.140 it goes,
00:42:17.920 there's going
00:42:18.280 to be a
00:42:18.500 whole bunch
00:42:18.840 of experts
00:42:19.400 who got it
00:42:19.920 right that
00:42:20.500 time.
00:42:21.800 And they
00:42:22.120 will come
00:42:22.380 on television
00:42:22.940 and they'll
00:42:23.180 say,
00:42:23.460 yeah,
00:42:23.620 I got it
00:42:23.980 wrong that
00:42:24.340 other time,
00:42:25.300 but this
00:42:25.720 time,
00:42:26.400 well,
00:42:26.720 this time
00:42:27.100 I got it
00:42:27.520 right.
00:42:27.820 My reasons
00:42:28.320 were right,
00:42:28.920 the outcome
00:42:29.280 was right,
00:42:30.000 boy,
00:42:30.180 did I do
00:42:30.520 good.
00:42:31.540 But really,
00:42:32.500 the market
00:42:32.960 was going
00:42:33.340 to be up
00:42:33.760 or it was
00:42:34.080 going to be
00:42:34.380 down and
00:42:34.900 half of the
00:42:35.320 people were
00:42:35.740 going to be
00:42:36.040 right no
00:42:36.560 matter what
00:42:36.920 happened.
00:42:38.500 So I
00:42:40.380 don't think,
00:42:41.740 I think
00:42:42.240 what we're,
00:42:42.720 here's my
00:42:43.320 hypothesis,
00:42:44.540 markets move
00:42:45.500 for irrational
00:42:46.480 reasons.
00:42:47.820 But there
00:42:48.340 are people
00:42:48.680 paid to
00:42:49.480 tell you
00:42:49.840 they move
00:42:50.320 for more
00:42:51.520 rational reasons.
00:42:53.160 So you
00:42:53.780 imagine that
00:42:54.580 they do
00:42:55.020 because all
00:42:55.520 these experts
00:42:56.060 are telling
00:42:56.380 you that.
00:42:57.000 But there's
00:42:57.340 no evidence
00:42:57.840 of that.
00:42:58.780 All the
00:42:59.360 evidence is
00:43:00.020 the experts
00:43:00.580 don't know
00:43:01.060 what's going
00:43:01.400 to happen.
00:43:02.440 They're
00:43:02.800 guessing too.
00:43:04.320 So here's
00:43:05.100 what I think,
00:43:05.760 and it's just
00:43:06.180 a guess,
00:43:07.280 that the
00:43:08.420 Elon Musk
00:43:09.680 effect and
00:43:10.340 Twitter had
00:43:11.080 such a big
00:43:11.700 effect on
00:43:12.260 optimism and
00:43:14.340 maybe energy
00:43:15.080 that it
00:43:18.160 looked like
00:43:18.640 the free
00:43:19.120 markets were
00:43:19.860 a little bit
00:43:20.300 freer.
00:43:23.880 Now, I
00:43:24.540 don't know
00:43:24.800 that there's
00:43:25.160 anything to
00:43:25.680 that, but
00:43:26.640 I would say
00:43:27.380 that yesterday
00:43:28.000 I felt more
00:43:29.160 optimistic about
00:43:30.440 the country
00:43:31.740 than at
00:43:33.280 any time
00:43:34.080 in certainly
00:43:35.060 a year or
00:43:36.360 two or
00:43:36.900 three.
00:43:38.540 I felt
00:43:39.400 actually just
00:43:40.200 giddy
00:43:40.800 yesterday.
00:43:42.980 I was
00:43:43.580 giddy.
00:43:45.040 I haven't
00:43:45.700 felt that.
00:43:47.620 What was
00:43:48.160 the last time
00:43:48.540 I felt that?
00:43:49.380 Election
00:43:49.900 night 2016
00:43:50.780 was a fun
00:43:51.500 night.
00:43:52.340 But that's
00:43:52.680 about it.
00:43:54.440 So
00:43:54.800 something's
00:43:55.920 happening that's
00:43:56.560 bigger than
00:43:57.040 Twitter and
00:43:57.700 bigger than
00:43:58.120 Musk, but 0.87
00:43:59.340 maybe that's
00:44:00.380 my illusion.
00:44:02.600 I don't
00:44:03.020 know.
00:44:03.240 So my
00:44:07.180 user numbers
00:44:08.060 went way
00:44:08.580 up.
00:44:09.360 So normally
00:44:10.000 I'd get
00:44:10.440 maybe 200
00:44:11.340 new followers
00:44:12.420 a day.
00:44:14.260 I got
00:44:14.980 4,000
00:44:15.700 yesterday.
00:44:17.380 Now, do
00:44:17.700 you think
00:44:18.060 that I went
00:44:18.620 from a
00:44:19.020 baseline of
00:44:19.600 200 a
00:44:20.780 day to
00:44:21.240 4,000
00:44:22.020 just because
00:44:25.360 more people
00:44:25.940 were interested
00:44:26.500 in joining
00:44:27.060 Twitter?
00:44:28.880 Now, remember,
00:44:29.480 Elon Musk has
00:44:30.300 confirmed that
00:44:30.940 he's made no
00:44:31.520 change to
00:44:33.020 who's allowed
00:44:34.100 on and
00:44:35.680 no change
00:44:36.200 to the
00:44:36.460 algorithm.
00:44:41.940 Did
00:44:42.460 everybody go
00:44:43.280 up?
00:44:43.660 In other
00:44:43.940 words, are
00:44:44.420 people on
00:44:45.340 the left
00:44:45.720 going up
00:44:46.200 as well?
00:44:47.820 Is it
00:44:48.360 bots?
00:44:51.220 Let me
00:44:51.860 put out a
00:44:52.400 hypothesis.
00:44:54.440 Now, there's
00:44:55.180 no knowledge
00:44:56.260 behind this,
00:44:56.900 right?
00:44:57.340 So this is
00:44:57.960 pure speculation.
00:44:59.860 Imagine if
00:45:00.620 you were the
00:45:01.300 Twitter engineers
00:45:02.060 and you did
00:45:02.880 in fact know
00:45:04.000 that the
00:45:04.380 algorithm was
00:45:05.160 suppressing
00:45:05.600 some people.
00:45:08.060 As Paul
00:45:08.940 Collider pointed
00:45:09.640 out on
00:45:10.180 Twitter, you
00:45:11.740 can imagine
00:45:12.240 them architecting
00:45:13.620 that in at
00:45:15.080 least two
00:45:15.460 different ways.
00:45:16.600 One would be
00:45:17.420 there's something
00:45:17.940 about the
00:45:18.400 algorithm itself
00:45:19.420 that suppresses
00:45:21.180 conservatives,
00:45:21.900 maybe by
00:45:22.380 keywords or
00:45:23.400 something like
00:45:23.740 that.
00:45:24.240 That would be
00:45:24.560 one way to
00:45:25.000 go.
00:45:25.480 The other
00:45:26.060 way to go
00:45:26.700 would be that
00:45:27.300 the algorithm
00:45:27.840 is the
00:45:28.500 algorithm,
00:45:29.740 but that
00:45:30.360 some
00:45:30.720 individuals
00:45:31.380 are tagged.
00:45:33.420 So if you've
00:45:34.000 been tagged as
00:45:34.760 somebody to
00:45:35.280 suppress, the
00:45:36.680 algorithm just
00:45:37.380 does what an
00:45:37.920 algorithm does
00:45:38.740 and it just
00:45:39.860 doesn't know
00:45:40.380 why it did
00:45:40.920 it.
00:45:41.480 It's just
00:45:41.980 reading those
00:45:43.720 tags.
00:45:45.120 So, as
00:45:46.720 Paul pointed
00:45:47.360 out cleverly,
00:45:48.720 if you remove
00:45:50.240 the database
00:45:50.820 with the tags,
00:45:52.180 or just remove
00:45:52.780 the tags,
00:45:53.360 the algorithm
00:45:54.820 would look
00:45:55.320 unchanged or
00:45:56.600 it would be
00:45:56.920 very hard to
00:45:57.560 notice that
00:45:58.240 there had ever
00:45:58.740 been anything
00:45:59.180 wrong there.
00:46:00.500 You'd have to
00:46:01.020 find the exact
00:46:01.680 thing that was
00:46:02.180 looking for the
00:46:02.740 tag, notice
00:46:04.140 that there
00:46:04.500 weren't any
00:46:04.860 tags, notice
00:46:05.580 that they
00:46:05.900 used to be.
00:46:06.940 I mean, you'd
00:46:07.340 have to go
00:46:07.680 pretty deep to
00:46:09.460 find out something
00:46:10.780 wrong had
00:46:11.480 happened, if
00:46:12.020 anything wrong
00:46:12.580 happened.
00:46:13.600 Now, do you
00:46:15.580 think that's
00:46:16.000 what happened?
00:46:16.980 Do you think
00:46:17.540 that there's
00:46:18.700 nothing but more
00:46:19.520 interest in
00:46:20.120 Twitter?
00:46:20.880 Let me ask
00:46:21.920 you this.
00:46:22.580 Do you think
00:46:23.040 that there
00:46:23.340 were 4,000
00:46:24.300 people who
00:46:26.060 didn't think
00:46:26.700 about following
00:46:27.360 me on Twitter
00:46:27.980 until yesterday?
00:46:29.880 What do you
00:46:30.560 think?
00:46:31.360 Is that
00:46:31.760 possible?
00:46:33.180 That 4,000 0.50
00:46:34.100 people didn't
00:46:35.740 really have a
00:46:36.260 notion of
00:46:36.740 following me on
00:46:37.320 Twitter until
00:46:37.840 yesterday?
00:46:40.980 Yeah.
00:46:41.700 And it's also
00:46:42.500 election season,
00:46:43.880 right?
00:46:45.220 But still,
00:46:46.400 it's a one-day
00:46:46.900 change.
00:46:47.760 You know,
00:46:47.900 election season's
00:46:48.720 been creeping up
00:46:49.620 for every day.
00:46:51.500 I don't know.
00:46:52.200 A lot of
00:46:52.880 conservatives
00:46:53.380 signing up?
00:46:54.380 That's a good
00:46:54.860 theory.
00:46:55.720 So one theory
00:46:56.340 would be there
00:46:57.560 were 5,000
00:46:58.340 conservatives who
00:46:59.220 had left
00:46:59.560 Twitter, and I'm
00:47:00.940 just one of the
00:47:01.660 people that they
00:47:02.280 would follow when
00:47:03.540 they signed back
00:47:04.120 up.
00:47:04.940 That could be.
00:47:06.580 Yeah.
00:47:07.500 I'm going to say
00:47:08.440 that the odds
00:47:09.940 that they changed
00:47:10.780 the algorithm are
00:47:11.820 low.
00:47:13.240 The odds that
00:47:14.380 it was just
00:47:16.180 conservatives coming
00:47:17.120 back is high.
00:47:17.900 But I wouldn't
00:47:19.900 rule out that
00:47:21.520 they may have
00:47:22.020 untagged
00:47:22.580 something.
00:47:23.900 You know,
00:47:24.040 maybe there was
00:47:24.500 like a kill
00:47:25.260 switch on there.
00:47:26.060 If the company
00:47:26.680 gets bought,
00:47:27.840 you know,
00:47:28.020 make this piece
00:47:28.600 of code
00:47:28.900 disappear.
00:47:30.740 Something like
00:47:31.360 that.
00:47:32.460 I don't know.
00:47:33.080 Seems like you
00:47:33.680 could hide it
00:47:34.160 pretty well if
00:47:34.680 you wanted to.
00:47:36.640 So,
00:47:37.380 Musk says he's
00:47:38.580 going to be
00:47:38.880 forming a
00:47:39.400 content moderation
00:47:40.400 council with
00:47:41.780 widely diverse
00:47:42.740 views,
00:47:43.840 and that they
00:47:44.900 won't make any
00:47:45.380 decisions about
00:47:46.100 who to reinstate
00:47:46.900 until this council
00:47:47.840 does their work.
00:47:50.700 So,
00:47:51.220 we'll find out.
00:47:54.740 All right.
00:47:55.700 Have you noticed
00:47:56.300 that the one,
00:47:57.720 I say this a lot,
00:47:58.600 but if you see
00:47:59.800 a story on the
00:48:00.700 internet that
00:48:01.500 makes your head
00:48:02.060 explode,
00:48:03.960 what's the first
00:48:04.720 thing you should
00:48:05.460 know is most
00:48:06.180 likely true
00:48:08.160 about that story?
00:48:10.280 It's fake.
00:48:11.280 Yeah.
00:48:11.860 And when I say
00:48:12.960 most likely,
00:48:13.680 I don't mean
00:48:14.080 51%.
00:48:15.120 I mean,
00:48:17.140 closer to 95%,
00:48:18.920 98%,
00:48:19.940 right?
00:48:21.680 The head
00:48:22.400 explode stories
00:48:23.340 are almost
00:48:24.340 always fake.
00:48:26.500 So,
00:48:27.080 the story about
00:48:27.880 Elon Musk
00:48:29.380 immediately
00:48:30.140 reinstating
00:48:31.260 yay,
00:48:31.860 which was
00:48:32.340 fake news,
00:48:33.720 made,
00:48:34.340 I saw on
00:48:34.900 Twitter,
00:48:35.380 heads were
00:48:35.780 exploding.
00:48:36.620 How could
00:48:37.120 you let him
00:48:37.600 back on that
00:48:38.380 anti-Semite?
00:48:39.680 And of course,
00:48:40.140 the answer is,
00:48:41.300 if your head
00:48:41.860 exploded,
00:48:43.180 it probably
00:48:43.620 didn't happen,
00:48:44.780 and sure
00:48:45.140 enough,
00:48:45.380 it didn't.
00:48:49.320 All right,
00:48:50.600 just more on
00:48:51.540 this Jack
00:48:52.320 Dorsey's new
00:48:53.340 product.
00:48:54.660 I guess it's
00:48:55.080 going to launch
00:48:55.560 soon,
00:48:55.960 it's already
00:48:56.260 got beta
00:48:56.700 users.
00:48:57.720 I think it's
00:48:58.260 called Blue
00:48:58.680 Sky.
00:48:59.260 I may have
00:48:59.780 used the
00:49:00.780 wrong name
00:49:01.380 for it
00:49:02.040 yesterday.
00:49:02.940 I don't know
00:49:03.420 what Zion
00:49:03.900 is,
00:49:05.000 so I'm a
00:49:05.360 little confused
00:49:05.940 about what's
00:49:06.400 the product,
00:49:06.980 maybe what's
00:49:07.420 the technology.
00:49:08.120 But the
00:49:09.960 idea here
00:49:10.720 is apparently
00:49:11.900 there are
00:49:12.340 multiple
00:49:13.020 social networks
00:49:15.160 in some
00:49:16.020 kind of
00:49:16.480 formative
00:49:16.940 stage.
00:49:17.760 They were
00:49:18.180 trying to
00:49:18.680 solve the
00:49:19.140 problem that
00:49:20.640 current social
00:49:21.360 medias don't
00:49:22.000 solve,
00:49:22.360 which is too
00:49:23.120 much consolidation
00:49:23.820 of power
00:49:24.440 and the
00:49:24.780 government
00:49:25.180 could force
00:49:28.440 them to do
00:49:29.020 something.
00:49:30.300 So the
00:49:31.540 ideal situation
00:49:32.400 would be you
00:49:33.160 could post on
00:49:34.460 any social
00:49:35.100 network,
00:49:36.000 you would
00:49:36.340 always own
00:49:36.900 your own
00:49:37.280 data so
00:49:38.460 nobody else
00:49:39.040 could influence
00:49:39.660 it,
00:49:39.920 and there
00:49:40.140 wouldn't be
00:49:40.460 any corporate
00:49:42.120 entity that
00:49:42.840 could be
00:49:43.340 influenced by
00:49:44.360 money.
00:49:45.680 And I
00:49:47.080 don't even
00:49:47.440 know if
00:49:48.180 Blue Sky
00:49:48.640 is a
00:49:49.280 money-making
00:49:49.920 venture.
00:49:51.140 I'm that
00:49:51.960 confused about
00:49:52.880 it.
00:49:53.240 I'll probably
00:49:53.760 know by the
00:49:54.280 end of the
00:49:54.620 day.
00:49:55.480 But is
00:49:56.200 Blue Sky
00:49:56.760 an open
00:49:57.540 code,
00:50:00.500 open network
00:50:01.220 for the
00:50:02.420 benefit of
00:50:02.920 the world?
00:50:04.560 Or is it
00:50:05.340 a money-making
00:50:05.900 venture?
00:50:06.900 It's open
00:50:07.640 source, but
00:50:08.320 that doesn't
00:50:08.740 mean it's
00:50:10.640 not-for-profit.
00:50:13.080 So I'm a
00:50:13.560 little confused
00:50:14.220 about what's
00:50:14.660 going on,
00:50:15.560 but at
00:50:16.080 least there's
00:50:16.700 a possibility
00:50:18.200 that there's
00:50:19.560 some blockchain
00:50:20.420 related open
00:50:21.780 system that
00:50:23.800 people might
00:50:24.400 enjoy that
00:50:25.280 would have
00:50:25.660 less government
00:50:26.780 influence,
00:50:28.040 maybe.
00:50:30.780 Yeah, and
00:50:31.760 then you
00:50:32.000 could own
00:50:32.280 your own
00:50:32.580 data.
00:50:33.320 Now that's
00:50:33.740 one of the
00:50:34.200 benefits of
00:50:35.000 the locals
00:50:35.980 platform.
00:50:36.900 I'll give
00:50:37.740 a little
00:50:37.980 commercial
00:50:38.420 for it.
00:50:38.880 So I have
00:50:40.060 a subscription
00:50:40.720 community within
00:50:42.340 the locals
00:50:43.040 platform, and
00:50:44.960 part of the
00:50:46.040 deal there,
00:50:46.660 I'm also an
00:50:48.020 investor,
00:50:49.320 part of the
00:50:50.820 deal there is
00:50:51.380 that I get
00:50:51.980 to keep all
00:50:52.520 my user
00:50:53.060 data.
00:50:54.200 So I have
00:50:54.740 X number
00:50:55.280 of users or
00:50:56.740 subscribers or
00:50:57.960 community members,
00:50:58.780 users, and
00:51:00.000 presumably if
00:51:02.900 I decided not
00:51:03.680 to use
00:51:04.020 locals anymore,
00:51:04.800 I get to
00:51:05.480 keep my
00:51:06.040 list of
00:51:07.600 users.
00:51:09.680 So, I
00:51:10.100 mean, that
00:51:10.360 seems fair.
00:51:12.220 All right,
00:51:12.780 let's talk
00:51:13.060 about Paul
00:51:14.120 Pelosi.
00:51:16.080 Number one,
00:51:19.120 he's a
00:51:20.040 fighter at
00:51:20.540 82.
00:51:22.420 I like the
00:51:23.300 fact that at
00:51:23.880 82 he was
00:51:24.720 willing to get
00:51:25.300 into a physical
00:51:26.020 confrontation.
00:51:26.600 I mean, I
00:51:28.580 don't know if
00:51:28.880 he thought he
00:51:29.280 had an
00:51:29.720 option, but
00:51:30.860 I sort of
00:51:32.200 liked the
00:51:32.560 fact that he
00:51:33.080 manned up and
00:51:33.760 he was going
00:51:34.200 to do what
00:51:35.000 he could, but
00:51:35.500 at 82,
00:51:36.180 obviously, he
00:51:37.400 was limited
00:51:37.860 in his
00:51:38.220 abilities.
00:51:39.320 Now, I
00:51:39.860 would like to
00:51:40.260 say something
00:51:40.880 that is
00:51:42.820 maybe
00:51:46.340 uncharacteristically
00:51:47.420 positive about
00:51:50.120 the Internet.
00:51:51.580 I thought
00:51:52.380 that social
00:51:53.300 media was
00:51:55.400 unusually
00:51:56.480 respectful to
00:51:58.520 the Pelosi's
00:51:59.500 yesterday, and
00:52:01.060 I enjoyed
00:52:01.580 that.
00:52:02.360 I enjoyed
00:52:02.840 that, because
00:52:03.700 I expected
00:52:04.220 worse.
00:52:05.520 Now, of
00:52:05.880 course, there
00:52:06.240 was the usual
00:52:06.760 amount of
00:52:07.160 4chan stuff,
00:52:08.260 but there
00:52:09.500 weren't as
00:52:09.940 many memes
00:52:10.580 as I
00:52:10.940 would have
00:52:11.140 thought.
00:52:12.000 There
00:52:12.220 weren't as
00:52:12.700 many ugly
00:52:13.860 jokes, but
00:52:15.440 there were
00:52:15.720 jokes.
00:52:16.740 There were
00:52:17.060 jokes.
00:52:17.900 And I
00:52:18.260 would like
00:52:18.540 to maybe
00:52:21.500 boost that
00:52:22.680 show of
00:52:23.200 respect.
00:52:23.520 respect.
00:52:23.940 I do
00:52:24.200 think that
00:52:24.680 the world
00:52:25.580 showed him
00:52:26.280 some respect.
00:52:27.860 And given
00:52:28.540 the division
00:52:30.180 in our
00:52:30.640 politics, I
00:52:32.280 don't know, I
00:52:32.840 was a little
00:52:33.680 bit inspired by
00:52:34.560 it, actually.
00:52:35.720 I mean, it's a
00:52:36.760 huge tragedy.
00:52:38.220 I really hate
00:52:38.920 that that
00:52:39.220 happened to
00:52:40.100 anybody.
00:52:41.580 To anybody.
00:52:42.940 But I feel
00:52:44.540 like the
00:52:44.940 public's
00:52:45.700 reaction to
00:52:47.180 it was not
00:52:49.280 horrifying.
00:52:49.880 And I
00:52:51.540 was surprised,
00:52:52.620 actually
00:52:53.000 impressed.
00:52:54.620 That said,
00:52:56.860 has enough
00:52:57.380 time going
00:52:58.260 by that I
00:52:58.780 can make
00:52:59.080 some jokes
00:52:59.500 about this?
00:53:02.820 Everybody
00:53:03.300 okay?
00:53:04.120 Here's the
00:53:04.680 way I'm
00:53:04.940 going to do
00:53:05.300 it.
00:53:06.200 I'm going
00:53:06.600 to tell
00:53:06.980 you about
00:53:07.440 somebody
00:53:07.920 else's joke
00:53:08.660 about it.
00:53:10.020 Okay?
00:53:11.340 Because if I
00:53:11.960 tell you
00:53:12.360 somebody else's
00:53:13.100 joke about it,
00:53:13.740 I'm just
00:53:14.040 reporting about
00:53:14.720 these terrible
00:53:15.320 people, these
00:53:16.380 trolls on the
00:53:17.020 internet.
00:53:17.820 That's fair.
00:53:18.300 I can
00:53:19.380 certainly
00:53:19.660 report about
00:53:20.220 those damn
00:53:20.680 trolls.
00:53:22.100 So this
00:53:22.780 is not
00:53:23.120 funny, but
00:53:24.720 it's things
00:53:25.120 those damn
00:53:25.700 trolls are
00:53:26.200 saying.
00:53:28.140 Apparently,
00:53:29.260 both men
00:53:30.060 were discovered
00:53:30.760 in their
00:53:31.600 underpants at
00:53:33.140 2.30 in
00:53:33.900 the morning.
00:53:35.980 And of
00:53:36.500 course, the
00:53:36.940 4chan trolls
00:53:37.840 are wondering
00:53:38.320 if this was
00:53:38.860 a grinder
00:53:39.340 hookup that
00:53:39.980 went wrong.
00:53:41.500 Now,
00:53:43.160 I just
00:53:44.320 saw a
00:53:44.700 user,
00:53:45.600 Chael,
00:53:45.900 said,
00:53:46.120 looks like
00:53:46.480 a grinder
00:53:46.920 hookup going
00:53:47.600 bad.
00:53:48.300 I think
00:53:49.760 I laughed
00:53:50.180 for 10
00:53:50.600 minutes.
00:53:51.980 Okay?
00:53:53.040 Talk about
00:53:53.780 a grinder
00:53:54.280 hookup going
00:53:54.980 bad.
00:53:55.660 That's about
00:53:56.160 as bad
00:53:56.560 as you
00:53:56.820 could go.
00:53:58.020 Because you
00:53:58.620 can imagine
00:53:59.020 what that
00:53:59.360 would look
00:53:59.660 like.
00:54:00.720 You know,
00:54:00.960 Paul Pelosi
00:54:01.580 saying he's
00:54:02.720 29 years
00:54:03.460 old and
00:54:03.880 he's
00:54:04.020 82.
00:54:05.660 Like,
00:54:06.000 classic.
00:54:06.780 Classic
00:54:07.240 grinder.
00:54:08.400 I'm
00:54:08.680 guessing.
00:54:09.220 I'm not
00:54:09.540 on grinder.
00:54:09.980 here.
00:54:12.780 And you
00:54:14.280 can imagine
00:54:14.720 that the
00:54:15.160 other guy
00:54:16.040 shows up
00:54:16.680 and suddenly
00:54:17.820 there's a
00:54:18.200 hammer involved
00:54:18.980 and it's
00:54:19.880 just a
00:54:20.180 grinder day
00:54:21.400 gone bad.
00:54:22.820 Now,
00:54:24.240 joking aside,
00:54:26.540 the reason
00:54:27.840 that both men
00:54:28.420 were in their
00:54:28.840 underwear is
00:54:29.860 one is a
00:54:30.460 famous nudist,
00:54:31.920 so he's
00:54:32.320 always in his
00:54:32.860 underwear,
00:54:33.640 and the other
00:54:34.140 one was
00:54:34.620 awakened at
00:54:35.200 2.30 in
00:54:35.800 the morning.
00:54:36.100 So there
00:54:37.280 is a good
00:54:37.900 reason both
00:54:38.500 men were in
00:54:39.020 their underwear
00:54:39.540 that's fully
00:54:40.400 explained within
00:54:41.200 a grinder
00:54:41.860 account.
00:54:42.860 But it
00:54:44.020 was still
00:54:44.300 funny.
00:54:45.300 It was still
00:54:45.680 funny.
00:54:46.040 With all
00:54:46.600 respect.
00:54:47.620 With all
00:54:48.320 respect to
00:54:49.080 the Pelosi's,
00:54:50.320 it was still
00:54:50.640 kind of funny.
00:54:53.680 Likewise,
00:54:54.780 some people
00:54:56.440 on the
00:54:56.800 internet,
00:54:57.240 probably more
00:54:57.720 than one,
00:54:58.820 pointed out
00:54:59.420 this wasn't
00:55:00.060 the first
00:55:00.720 time that
00:55:01.340 Paul Pelosi
00:55:01.940 had been
00:55:02.300 hammered.
00:55:04.720 Poor taste.
00:55:06.100 Poor taste.
00:55:07.680 I disavow
00:55:08.640 these trolls
00:55:09.380 who made
00:55:09.860 that clever
00:55:10.740 pun.
00:55:12.580 It was the
00:55:13.140 second time
00:55:13.760 he's been
00:55:14.060 hammered this
00:55:14.840 year.
00:55:15.940 All right,
00:55:16.420 let's talk
00:55:16.800 about some
00:55:17.140 more persuasion.
00:55:18.100 Obama
00:55:18.660 trying to
00:55:19.920 wade into
00:55:20.500 the situation,
00:55:22.860 the election
00:55:23.300 with Herschel
00:55:24.220 Walker.
00:55:25.900 And Obama
00:55:26.500 said this,
00:55:27.680 and we will
00:55:28.180 grade this
00:55:28.720 for persuasion.
00:55:29.580 Obama says,
00:55:30.780 some of you,
00:55:32.160 let's see if I
00:55:33.060 can do an
00:55:33.460 Obama impression.
00:55:35.160 Some of you,
00:55:35.800 may not
00:55:36.840 ah,
00:55:37.480 ah,
00:55:38.320 ah,
00:55:39.180 ah,
00:55:40.260 ah,
00:55:41.520 ah,
00:55:42.380 ah,
00:55:42.780 ah,
00:55:43.880 ah,
00:55:44.880 ah.
00:55:45.440 Some of you
00:55:46.120 may not
00:55:46.520 ah,
00:55:47.680 remember,
00:55:48.580 but Herschel
00:55:49.460 Walker was a
00:55:50.360 heck of a
00:55:50.800 football player.
00:55:51.960 Does that make
00:55:52.900 him the best
00:55:53.580 person to
00:55:54.100 represent you?
00:55:55.320 Let's say
00:55:56.000 you're at the
00:55:56.440 airport,
00:55:57.040 and you see
00:55:57.480 Walker,
00:55:58.020 and you say,
00:55:58.840 hey,
00:55:59.380 there's Herschel,
00:56:00.480 there's Herschel,
00:56:01.560 Heisman winner.
00:56:02.700 Let's have him
00:56:03.360 fly the plane.
00:56:04.040 We will now
00:56:06.860 grade him
00:56:07.480 on his
00:56:08.180 persuasion.
00:56:09.080 Don't grade me
00:56:09.700 on my,
00:56:10.220 my,
00:56:10.800 on my,
00:56:12.320 my performance.
00:56:14.580 That was
00:56:15.120 bad.
00:56:17.000 All right,
00:56:17.760 what do you
00:56:18.060 think of that
00:56:18.420 point?
00:56:19.240 Just because
00:56:19.900 Herschel Walker
00:56:20.540 was a Heisman
00:56:21.420 winner,
00:56:22.400 that doesn't
00:56:22.860 make him a
00:56:23.360 politician.
00:56:24.560 And just
00:56:24.940 because he's
00:56:25.500 a Heisman
00:56:25.900 winner doesn't
00:56:26.580 mean he can
00:56:26.980 fly a plane.
00:56:28.300 And what did
00:56:29.120 people say
00:56:29.620 about that,
00:56:30.060 they said,
00:56:31.380 your analogy
00:56:33.860 is no good
00:56:34.740 because the
00:56:36.520 person he's
00:56:37.020 running against
00:56:37.720 can't fly a
00:56:38.500 plane.
00:56:41.960 No.
00:56:42.480 No,
00:56:44.300 that's not
00:56:44.720 how analogies
00:56:45.600 work.
00:56:46.840 No,
00:56:47.100 that's not
00:56:47.520 how analogies
00:56:48.220 work.
00:56:48.620 And other
00:56:48.880 people said,
00:56:49.500 no,
00:56:49.680 that doesn't
00:56:50.060 work because
00:56:51.100 Obama himself
00:56:52.020 doesn't know
00:56:52.480 how to fly a
00:56:53.060 plane.
00:56:55.160 No.
00:56:56.140 No.
00:56:57.300 That's not
00:56:57.860 how analogies
00:56:58.760 work.
00:57:01.000 An analogy
00:57:02.120 is not about
00:57:04.040 all the things
00:57:04.820 being the
00:57:05.280 same.
00:57:06.460 An analogy
00:57:07.000 is about
00:57:07.420 one narrow
00:57:08.200 point,
00:57:09.360 and the
00:57:09.740 narrow point
00:57:10.320 being,
00:57:11.200 if you're
00:57:12.120 an expert
00:57:12.560 in one
00:57:13.020 thing,
00:57:13.880 it doesn't
00:57:14.480 necessarily
00:57:15.200 make you
00:57:15.720 an expert
00:57:16.160 in another
00:57:16.760 thing.
00:57:17.580 That's it.
00:57:19.220 It does
00:57:19.920 not matter
00:57:20.460 if Obama
00:57:21.140 can fly a
00:57:21.820 plane.
00:57:23.240 Right?
00:57:23.940 Not the
00:57:24.500 point.
00:57:25.500 Not the
00:57:25.940 point.
00:57:27.600 Anyway,
00:57:28.720 as soon as
00:57:29.260 an analogy
00:57:29.980 enters,
00:57:30.500 everybody
00:57:30.720 goes nuts.
00:57:32.120 But,
00:57:33.060 I liked
00:57:34.840 it because
00:57:35.320 it was
00:57:35.740 visual,
00:57:36.540 and you
00:57:36.960 could feel
00:57:37.500 it.
00:57:38.440 Did I
00:57:38.780 tell you
00:57:39.120 that the
00:57:39.580 greatest
00:57:40.060 persuasion
00:57:40.660 is fear?
00:57:42.900 And following
00:57:43.620 that,
00:57:44.020 the greatest
00:57:44.360 persuasion
00:57:45.680 is usually
00:57:46.280 visual
00:57:47.300 persuasion.
00:57:48.940 So here
00:57:49.440 Obama
00:57:49.840 managed to
00:57:50.540 get some
00:57:50.920 visual,
00:57:51.660 because you
00:57:51.940 imagine
00:57:52.280 yourself
00:57:52.720 walking up
00:57:53.280 to Walker
00:57:53.700 in the
00:57:54.140 airport,
00:57:54.580 right?
00:57:55.780 Don't you
00:57:56.300 imagine it?
00:57:57.600 When he
00:57:57.900 describes it,
00:57:58.600 you put
00:57:58.840 yourself in
00:57:59.260 the airport.
00:57:59.720 Oh,
00:57:59.940 there's
00:58:00.160 Churchill
00:58:00.420 Walker
00:58:00.680 in the
00:58:00.900 airport.
00:58:01.820 Now,
00:58:01.960 you're
00:58:02.120 seeing him,
00:58:02.640 and then
00:58:02.880 you imagine
00:58:03.320 him with
00:58:03.640 a pilot
00:58:04.060 outfit,
00:58:04.640 looking like
00:58:05.120 John Travolta,
00:58:06.220 right?
00:58:06.540 Right?
00:58:07.160 Like Little
00:58:07.580 Anna Place.
00:58:08.760 And then you
00:58:10.320 imagine yourself
00:58:10.940 on a plane,
00:58:12.600 and you imagine
00:58:13.260 that an unqualified
00:58:14.300 pilot is flying it,
00:58:15.760 and you're like,
00:58:16.240 oh,
00:58:16.520 I'm afraid.
00:58:17.580 So somehow,
00:58:18.420 Obama managed to
00:58:19.340 work fear and
00:58:20.820 visual into it,
00:58:21.840 but because he
00:58:23.640 made it an
00:58:24.180 analogy,
00:58:24.800 everybody blew
00:58:25.720 up on the
00:58:26.120 analogy and it
00:58:26.820 didn't work.
00:58:28.700 You know,
00:58:29.020 I was going to
00:58:29.960 grade Obama
00:58:31.540 high for the
00:58:33.960 visual and for
00:58:34.720 the fact that he
00:58:35.200 worked some fear
00:58:35.980 in there in a
00:58:36.560 clever way,
00:58:37.840 but when you see
00:58:39.080 that it's an
00:58:39.520 analogy and the
00:58:40.840 public can't
00:58:41.620 handle analogies,
00:58:43.000 they just argue
00:58:43.660 the details,
00:58:44.360 which is completely
00:58:45.020 missing the point,
00:58:47.060 I guess I'd say it
00:58:48.620 didn't work,
00:58:49.360 but it was a hell
00:58:49.740 of a try.
00:58:54.220 Yeah.
00:58:56.100 All right.
00:58:57.420 Was there
00:58:57.940 anything that
00:58:58.520 happened in the
00:58:59.220 actual news that
00:59:00.260 didn't have anything
00:59:00.940 to do with
00:59:01.660 Twitter or
00:59:03.660 your personal
00:59:05.680 life?
00:59:12.720 Now do
00:59:14.000 Herschel
00:59:14.640 a brain surgeon.
00:59:17.700 Yeah.
00:59:18.620 So somebody
00:59:19.160 says, you
00:59:20.040 know, can
00:59:20.400 Fetterman fly
00:59:21.120 the plane?
00:59:24.740 The point
00:59:25.620 is,
00:59:27.280 now, how
00:59:30.260 many of you
00:59:30.680 actually literally
00:59:31.460 don't understand
00:59:32.320 the point is
00:59:33.840 that being good
00:59:34.440 at one thing
00:59:35.060 doesn't make you
00:59:35.820 automatically good
00:59:36.760 at another thing?
00:59:38.260 Does anybody
00:59:38.700 not know that's
00:59:39.560 the point?
00:59:40.640 And if you
00:59:41.020 understand that
00:59:41.620 is the point,
00:59:42.760 why would you
00:59:43.440 argue about
00:59:44.360 whether Fetterman
00:59:45.800 could fly a
00:59:47.020 plane?
00:59:47.400 what's that
00:59:49.620 got to do
00:59:50.060 with anything?
00:59:52.100 Fetterman is
00:59:52.900 a politician
00:59:53.660 looking for a
00:59:54.820 job as another
00:59:55.620 politician.
00:59:57.200 That's a little
00:59:57.940 bit closer
00:59:58.600 than a
00:59:59.800 Heisman
01:00:00.200 trophy winner
01:00:00.800 trying to
01:00:01.240 become a
01:00:01.660 senator.
01:00:03.040 Right?
01:00:03.240 Mayor to
01:00:03.740 senator,
01:00:04.340 it's a
01:00:04.620 reach,
01:00:05.720 but at
01:00:06.100 least it's
01:00:06.480 the same
01:00:06.940 domain.
01:00:09.440 And by the
01:00:09.900 way, that
01:00:10.200 doesn't mean
01:00:10.600 that Herschel
01:00:11.060 Walker
01:00:11.340 wouldn't be a
01:00:11.940 good senator.
01:00:12.920 I don't
01:00:13.880 have an
01:00:14.160 opinion on
01:00:14.660 that.
01:00:22.640 Give an
01:00:23.480 example from
01:00:24.360 the movie.
01:00:25.460 What?
01:00:27.000 Okay.
01:00:29.100 Do you
01:00:29.820 believe that
01:00:30.620 success is a
01:00:32.720 transferable
01:00:33.540 skill?
01:00:35.200 How many
01:00:35.660 of you believe
01:00:36.300 that being
01:00:36.680 successful at
01:00:37.440 one thing,
01:00:38.780 let's say
01:00:39.460 successful in
01:00:42.080 the film
01:00:42.560 industry?
01:00:44.420 Does that
01:00:46.820 extend to
01:00:47.300 other domains?
01:00:50.240 It depends.
01:00:51.880 Yeah, it
01:00:52.120 depends.
01:00:54.680 Mark Wahlberg
01:00:55.780 got famous,
01:00:58.680 and he's a
01:00:59.220 great example.
01:01:00.080 So Mark Wahlberg
01:01:00.920 gets famous
01:01:01.640 singing with,
01:01:03.700 I believe,
01:01:04.240 no real
01:01:04.860 musical background.
01:01:06.080 Am I right?
01:01:07.380 He was part
01:01:07.860 of a group.
01:01:09.140 Right?
01:01:09.440 Mark Wahlberg
01:01:10.120 became famous
01:01:11.060 singing without
01:01:11.940 musical experience,
01:01:14.420 really.
01:01:15.860 Then he became
01:01:16.760 an actor without
01:01:17.960 acting experience,
01:01:19.620 and he succeeded
01:01:20.980 again, right?
01:01:22.440 He has now
01:01:23.300 started several,
01:01:26.520 I don't know
01:01:27.000 how many,
01:01:27.400 maybe six or
01:01:28.280 so,
01:01:29.260 companies that
01:01:30.420 have nothing to
01:01:31.040 do with being
01:01:31.720 an actor or
01:01:32.240 singer.
01:01:33.020 Like one is
01:01:33.640 Wahlbergers, 0.66
01:01:34.500 he's an investor
01:01:35.460 in that,
01:01:36.040 they make
01:01:36.260 burgers,
01:01:37.020 and several
01:01:37.840 other businesses.
01:01:39.260 Now, I don't
01:01:39.620 know how successful
01:01:40.400 they are,
01:01:41.460 but he seems
01:01:42.380 to be somebody
01:01:43.020 who can manage
01:01:43.860 business,
01:01:45.160 as well as
01:01:46.120 singing,
01:01:46.960 as well as
01:01:47.860 acting,
01:01:48.480 with no experience
01:01:49.760 in any of those
01:01:50.540 things.
01:01:52.080 No experience
01:01:53.200 in any of the
01:01:54.120 things he's
01:01:54.600 succeeding in.
01:01:58.100 So,
01:01:59.000 is,
01:01:59.800 yeah,
01:02:00.000 and then
01:02:00.300 Ye would be
01:02:00.880 another example,
01:02:01.780 although,
01:02:02.220 you know,
01:02:02.820 the last few
01:02:04.020 weeks would
01:02:04.580 disprove it,
01:02:05.980 but,
01:02:06.440 you know,
01:02:06.680 it's a long game,
01:02:07.420 so we'll see
01:02:07.780 how he does.
01:02:08.720 But Ye,
01:02:09.240 another example,
01:02:10.100 success in music,
01:02:12.140 then he becomes
01:02:12.840 a producer.
01:02:14.180 Well,
01:02:14.380 okay,
01:02:14.580 they're sort
01:02:14.880 of related,
01:02:15.920 but then suddenly
01:02:16.740 he's making
01:02:17.600 clothing and
01:02:18.380 stuff,
01:02:19.680 totally unrelated.
01:02:21.980 Yeah,
01:02:22.260 Elon,
01:02:23.000 success in a
01:02:23.940 variety of
01:02:24.420 things that,
01:02:26.160 although you
01:02:26.880 could argue
01:02:27.280 that being an
01:02:27.800 entrepreneur,
01:02:29.320 you know,
01:02:29.520 a startup
01:02:29.940 person is a
01:02:30.980 skill that is
01:02:31.780 transferable,
01:02:32.840 for sure.
01:02:34.980 Trump,
01:02:35.600 yeah,
01:02:35.900 succeeded across,
01:02:36.680 now Trump's
01:02:37.560 an interesting
01:02:38.420 case,
01:02:38.940 because he
01:02:39.800 has a
01:02:40.120 tremendous
01:02:40.540 amount of
01:02:41.500 failed things.
01:02:45.260 But if your
01:02:46.020 strategy is to
01:02:46.800 just keep doing
01:02:47.460 a lot of
01:02:47.840 stuff,
01:02:48.800 and if any
01:02:49.360 of them
01:02:49.600 work,
01:02:50.260 you become
01:02:51.020 a billionaire
01:02:51.520 president,
01:02:52.780 then that's
01:02:53.180 a pretty good
01:02:53.560 strategy.
01:02:54.060 So you
01:02:54.260 wouldn't rank
01:02:55.240 Trump on
01:02:56.220 the percentage
01:02:56.920 of things
01:02:57.480 he got right.
01:02:58.460 You would
01:02:59.060 rank him on
01:02:59.720 the overall
01:03:00.280 strategy of
01:03:01.680 trying a
01:03:02.220 bunch of
01:03:02.540 stuff that
01:03:03.900 all have a
01:03:04.480 huge upside.
01:03:05.140 Shaq,
01:03:07.660 Shaq's a 1.00
01:03:08.240 great example.
01:03:09.460 Shaq is 0.99
01:03:09.980 now doing
01:03:11.040 TV commentary
01:03:12.460 very well,
01:03:14.340 and I
01:03:15.280 believe he's
01:03:15.640 got a
01:03:16.340 number of
01:03:16.700 people who
01:03:17.080 have started,
01:03:17.700 you know,
01:03:19.460 Shaq was 0.97
01:03:20.080 actually in
01:03:20.500 my town.
01:03:21.940 He was
01:03:22.280 like walking
01:03:22.760 distance down
01:03:23.500 there,
01:03:23.940 because I
01:03:24.640 walk it all
01:03:25.080 the time.
01:03:25.840 He was in
01:03:26.160 the restaurant
01:03:26.740 I eat at
01:03:27.260 all the time.
01:03:27.980 He was
01:03:28.460 selling his
01:03:29.380 liquor there,
01:03:31.240 at an event.
01:03:32.700 Yeah,
01:03:32.940 if you look
01:03:34.560 around,
01:03:34.980 you'll see
01:03:35.280 that the
01:03:35.640 most famous
01:03:36.560 people,
01:03:39.420 Stallone is
01:03:40.240 a great
01:03:40.600 example.
01:03:42.580 Stallone
01:03:43.100 blows me
01:03:44.460 away with
01:03:45.620 his talent
01:03:46.140 stack.
01:03:47.640 Here's
01:03:48.000 something you
01:03:48.380 don't know
01:03:48.700 about Sylvester
01:03:49.600 Stallone.
01:03:50.880 I might have
01:03:51.540 the story a
01:03:52.080 little bit
01:03:52.380 wrong,
01:03:52.760 but this is
01:03:53.140 approximately
01:03:53.620 right.
01:03:54.360 The first
01:03:54.900 Rocky,
01:03:56.180 he wrote,
01:03:57.960 let me say
01:03:58.540 that again,
01:03:59.020 he wrote
01:03:59.480 that before
01:04:01.080 he was ever
01:04:01.640 an actor,
01:04:03.020 or a famous
01:04:03.500 actor.
01:04:04.220 He wrote
01:04:04.620 it,
01:04:04.880 and then
01:04:05.100 I think
01:04:06.480 he was
01:04:06.720 offered
01:04:06.960 like $400,000
01:04:08.240 for it,
01:04:09.580 back when
01:04:10.180 that would
01:04:10.540 be worth,
01:04:11.420 I don't know,
01:04:11.820 maybe $2
01:04:12.340 million in
01:04:13.180 today's money,
01:04:14.180 and he was
01:04:14.820 broke.
01:04:16.320 He was
01:04:16.640 offered $2
01:04:17.680 million for
01:04:18.660 like a
01:04:19.440 photocopy of
01:04:20.380 a thing he
01:04:21.320 wrote,
01:04:22.240 and he turned
01:04:23.100 it down
01:04:23.520 because he
01:04:23.840 wanted to
01:04:24.180 act in it,
01:04:25.420 and then he
01:04:27.380 got his
01:04:27.720 way.
01:04:27.940 So he's
01:04:29.700 acted,
01:04:30.440 produced,
01:04:31.720 he's basically
01:04:32.560 done everything
01:04:33.320 you can do
01:04:33.900 in the movie
01:04:34.380 business,
01:04:34.900 right?
01:04:36.020 And here's
01:04:36.740 what blew
01:04:37.100 me away.
01:04:38.500 He has
01:04:38.960 an Instagram
01:04:39.600 account.
01:04:41.920 Now,
01:04:42.400 wouldn't you
01:04:42.900 expect that
01:04:43.500 somebody,
01:04:43.960 he's in his
01:04:44.400 70s,
01:04:44.900 right?
01:04:46.020 Can you
01:04:46.500 confirm his,
01:04:48.260 how old is
01:04:48.760 Sylvester?
01:04:49.240 He's in his
01:04:49.520 70s.
01:04:50.320 He's in his
01:04:50.900 70s,
01:04:51.360 he has one
01:04:51.780 of the best
01:04:52.180 Instagram
01:04:52.660 accounts.
01:04:54.340 Do you
01:04:54.620 know why?
01:04:55.780 Because he
01:04:56.180 understands it.
01:04:56.960 He understands
01:04:58.760 it.
01:04:59.440 He really
01:04:59.960 understands
01:05:00.500 Instagram.
01:05:01.500 I love his
01:05:02.140 account,
01:05:02.520 it's one of
01:05:02.820 the best
01:05:03.100 follows.
01:05:03.960 And he
01:05:04.300 gets on
01:05:04.660 there and
01:05:04.940 he just
01:05:05.220 does little
01:05:05.880 Stallone
01:05:07.140 things around
01:05:07.860 the house.
01:05:09.040 He's got
01:05:09.480 three beautiful
01:05:10.540 adult daughters
01:05:11.980 who look like
01:05:12.940 supermodels,
01:05:13.720 and he puts
01:05:14.040 them in there
01:05:14.480 all the time,
01:05:15.260 because he
01:05:15.700 knows what
01:05:16.080 sells,
01:05:16.860 right?
01:05:17.080 It's family,
01:05:18.240 but he knows
01:05:18.920 they're also
01:05:19.340 unusually
01:05:20.080 attractive.
01:05:25.900 Yeah.
01:05:26.380 I just
01:05:27.420 love
01:05:27.760 Stallone.
01:05:28.600 Stallone has
01:05:29.180 the sense
01:05:29.600 of humor.
01:05:30.840 He has
01:05:31.140 basically
01:05:31.500 every single,
01:05:33.600 everything that
01:05:34.440 you need
01:05:34.860 talent for,
01:05:35.460 he has every
01:05:36.040 one of them
01:05:36.400 covered.
01:05:37.100 It's quite
01:05:37.540 impressive.
01:05:38.440 Ryan Reynolds
01:05:39.020 is another.
01:05:39.960 We'll see how
01:05:40.580 he does.
01:05:41.480 Ryan Reynolds
01:05:42.280 has taken on
01:05:42.960 some businesses
01:05:43.660 that if I had
01:05:45.660 to bet on
01:05:46.380 them, I'd
01:05:46.760 bet against
01:05:47.280 them.
01:05:49.060 But he's
01:05:49.780 bringing a
01:05:50.440 huge asset
01:05:51.080 to them.
01:05:52.060 He's buying
01:05:52.780 a soccer team
01:05:53.620 you haven't
01:05:53.960 heard of,
01:05:54.500 and he's
01:05:55.680 got some
01:05:56.080 alcohol thing
01:05:56.940 that I haven't
01:05:57.380 heard of.
01:05:57.940 He's got
01:05:58.220 Mint Mobile
01:05:59.000 that I don't
01:06:00.220 understand how
01:06:00.880 they can compete
01:06:01.500 against the big
01:06:02.140 ones.
01:06:03.220 I don't
01:06:03.560 understand it.
01:06:04.260 I'm not
01:06:04.540 saying they
01:06:04.860 can't, I
01:06:05.200 just don't
01:06:05.540 understand how
01:06:06.240 that works.
01:06:07.600 Does anybody
01:06:08.060 understand how
01:06:08.740 Mint Mobile
01:06:09.420 can even offer
01:06:10.140 a product?
01:06:12.260 What's a
01:06:12.880 virtual network?
01:06:14.840 They buy
01:06:15.540 excess time on
01:06:16.440 existing networks?
01:06:17.300 Yeah, I
01:06:19.900 don't really
01:06:20.240 understand that.
01:06:22.200 All right.
01:06:24.740 It's a
01:06:25.280 reseller.
01:06:26.440 But it
01:06:26.940 doesn't seem
01:06:27.380 like a reseller
01:06:28.120 could get that
01:06:28.800 big if they're
01:06:29.720 just reselling
01:06:30.360 excess capacity.
01:06:33.880 Anyway, I
01:06:34.660 don't understand
01:06:35.160 it.
01:06:35.940 But I'm sure
01:06:36.500 it's a good
01:06:36.900 idea.
01:06:38.440 All right.
01:06:39.480 Any other
01:06:40.100 story that,
01:06:42.300 oh, Ryan
01:06:42.820 Reynolds
01:06:43.280 divorced?
01:06:45.080 No.
01:06:45.540 That's not
01:06:47.440 true, is
01:06:47.880 it?
01:06:49.220 Did Ryan
01:06:49.900 Reynolds divorce
01:06:50.660 with Blake
01:06:52.860 or whatever?
01:06:53.560 That's not
01:06:54.020 true.
01:06:55.220 Is it?
01:06:56.640 I don't
01:06:57.000 think that's
01:06:57.700 true.
01:06:58.660 I thought
01:06:59.300 they were
01:06:59.580 one of the
01:06:59.960 more successful
01:07:00.680 marriages.
01:07:03.060 Yeah.
01:07:03.520 No.
01:07:03.880 Let's not
01:07:04.500 say that
01:07:04.880 about him.
01:07:07.560 You know,
01:07:08.600 if Ryan
01:07:09.360 Reynolds
01:07:09.720 can't stay
01:07:10.280 married,
01:07:13.160 who can?
01:07:14.520 Oh,
01:07:14.640 yeah,
01:07:15.160 Tom Brady
01:07:15.820 got divorced.
01:07:20.600 Yeah,
01:07:21.480 Arnold,
01:07:22.580 Arnold
01:07:22.860 Schwarzenegger,
01:07:23.760 there's a
01:07:24.420 talent stack
01:07:24.960 guy.
01:07:25.840 You can see
01:07:26.440 why Arnold
01:07:26.920 Schwarzenegger
01:07:27.600 and Stallone
01:07:28.760 get along,
01:07:30.020 because they're
01:07:30.800 both geniuses
01:07:31.920 that people
01:07:32.640 don't recognize
01:07:33.940 as genius.
01:07:35.620 It's because
01:07:36.100 their genius
01:07:36.660 is distributed
01:07:37.640 against multiple
01:07:38.560 domains.
01:07:40.460 And if you
01:07:41.080 have genius
01:07:41.500 in one thing,
01:07:42.140 like, you
01:07:42.620 know,
01:07:42.800 golf or
01:07:43.440 physics,
01:07:44.180 everybody
01:07:45.020 says,
01:07:45.340 hey,
01:07:45.540 you're
01:07:45.680 Einstein
01:07:46.020 or you're
01:07:46.720 Tiger Woods.
01:07:48.780 But if
01:07:49.220 you're,
01:07:49.520 like,
01:07:49.660 really,
01:07:50.240 really seriously
01:07:51.200 good at a
01:07:51.940 whole bunch
01:07:52.480 of things,
01:07:53.320 people just
01:07:53.880 say,
01:07:54.200 well,
01:07:54.460 you had a
01:07:54.820 good career.
01:07:56.000 But I would
01:07:56.460 say that
01:07:56.920 both Stallone
01:07:57.900 and Schwarzenegger,
01:08:00.920 in my view of
01:08:01.820 things,
01:08:02.160 they qualify as
01:08:02.880 geniuses.
01:08:04.280 Because you
01:08:05.020 can't get that
01:08:05.740 much skill
01:08:06.500 added up
01:08:07.640 across so many
01:08:08.480 different domains.
01:08:09.200 Yeah,
01:08:09.500 the rock.
01:08:10.300 The rock's
01:08:10.800 got a lot
01:08:11.100 of skill.
01:08:15.600 Scott,
01:08:16.240 why would
01:08:16.580 Paul Pelosi
01:08:17.160 call the
01:08:17.820 attacker his
01:08:18.540 friend to
01:08:19.340 police?
01:08:20.840 Because the
01:08:21.880 attacker was
01:08:22.580 insane.
01:08:24.520 And he may
01:08:25.380 have been just
01:08:25.940 managing the
01:08:27.200 situation.
01:08:28.660 So if you
01:08:29.420 call him a
01:08:29.960 friend,
01:08:30.840 maybe you
01:08:31.600 get him to
01:08:33.780 be less
01:08:34.140 violent for a
01:08:34.840 moment.
01:08:35.060 I don't know.
01:08:35.500 I can
01:08:36.800 imagine any
01:08:38.160 number of
01:08:38.580 possibilities.
01:08:39.980 I would say
01:08:40.720 there's zero
01:08:41.680 credibility to
01:08:42.760 the fact that
01:08:45.380 it was anything
01:08:46.040 but a break-in.
01:08:47.800 I mean,
01:08:48.220 I don't think
01:08:48.900 that Paul
01:08:49.520 Pelosi broke
01:08:50.380 his own
01:08:50.800 window to
01:08:52.820 make it look
01:08:53.320 like it was a
01:08:53.840 break-in,
01:08:54.260 do you?
01:08:56.320 Do you think
01:08:56.960 he did that?
01:08:57.640 He did have a
01:08:58.220 hammer in his
01:08:58.700 hand.
01:08:59.180 On the other
01:08:59.800 hand, he did
01:09:00.240 have a hammer
01:09:00.700 in his hand,
01:09:01.280 so.
01:09:04.640 He did have
01:09:05.420 a hammer.
01:09:08.040 No, they 1.00
01:09:08.640 did not both
01:09:09.240 have hammers.
01:09:10.080 That confusion
01:09:11.320 was cleared
01:09:12.180 up.
01:09:13.040 Only Pelosi
01:09:13.740 had a hammer,
01:09:14.720 but the other
01:09:15.240 guy pulled it
01:09:16.320 out of his
01:09:16.680 hand and
01:09:17.120 then beat
01:09:17.460 him with
01:09:17.720 it.
01:09:17.960 So we
01:09:19.160 believe there
01:09:19.660 was one
01:09:20.020 hammer.
01:09:22.900 You're
01:09:23.340 thinking drug
01:09:23.920 related.
01:09:24.500 Well, it's
01:09:25.560 insanity for
01:09:27.300 sure.
01:09:29.980 All right.
01:09:31.880 I think it's
01:09:32.540 about time for
01:09:33.100 me to go eat
01:09:33.620 a bagel.
01:09:35.420 Long
01:09:37.940 Guitars
01:09:38.760 investment.
01:09:40.420 What?
01:09:44.900 Is there
01:09:45.420 any big story
01:09:46.040 I'm missing?
01:09:49.180 What's the
01:09:49.700 latest in
01:09:50.160 Ukraine?
01:09:53.040 So,
01:09:54.360 correct me if
01:09:56.920 I'm wrong.
01:09:57.420 Won't the
01:09:57.800 Russian soldiers
01:09:58.760 be freezing
01:10:00.300 too?
01:10:00.640 Why do
01:10:03.000 we keep
01:10:03.280 saying that
01:10:03.720 only the
01:10:04.120 Ukrainians
01:10:04.720 are going
01:10:05.000 to be
01:10:05.180 freezing?
01:10:06.480 I feel
01:10:07.100 like the
01:10:07.440 Russian
01:10:07.660 military is
01:10:08.280 going to
01:10:08.440 be pretty
01:10:08.820 cold.
01:10:10.340 So we're
01:10:10.980 already
01:10:11.260 seeing,
01:10:12.060 there's an
01:10:12.840 article on
01:10:13.660 the front
01:10:15.040 of CNN
01:10:16.380 about
01:10:17.900 the military
01:10:20.340 losing the
01:10:20.960 will to
01:10:21.280 live,
01:10:22.120 or the
01:10:22.460 will to
01:10:22.820 live,
01:10:23.200 the will
01:10:23.540 to fight.
01:10:24.040 Why is
01:10:30.260 this?
01:10:30.840 I have a
01:10:31.480 computer
01:10:32.440 problem.
01:10:34.140 All right.
01:10:35.480 Russia has 0.96
01:10:36.040 more energy
01:10:36.580 assets,
01:10:37.240 but you
01:10:37.380 have to
01:10:37.660 get them
01:10:38.200 to the
01:10:40.440 front.
01:10:41.900 And the
01:10:42.480 problem is
01:10:42.840 their supply
01:10:43.340 lines are
01:10:43.780 being cut.
01:10:47.900 Bagels are
01:10:48.520 bad for me.
01:10:50.840 Well,
01:10:51.520 compared to
01:10:51.940 some things
01:10:52.420 maybe.
01:10:59.340 If all
01:10:59.980 you have
01:11:00.220 is a
01:11:00.480 hammer,
01:11:00.800 everything
01:11:01.020 looks like
01:11:01.480 a nail.
01:11:05.080 Oh,
01:11:05.600 that's
01:11:05.880 terrible.
01:11:12.360 Yeah.
01:11:13.840 You think
01:11:14.760 most Russians
01:11:15.440 have never
01:11:15.880 been in a
01:11:16.380 hostile
01:11:16.720 environment?
01:11:18.440 What?
01:11:19.420 I'm pretty
01:11:20.060 sure every
01:11:20.520 Russian that's 0.94
01:11:21.120 been in a
01:11:21.520 hostile
01:11:21.840 weather
01:11:22.380 environment.
01:11:25.180 Oh,
01:11:26.160 let me tell
01:11:26.640 you about
01:11:26.980 a tip
01:11:27.680 that I
01:11:28.020 heard the
01:11:28.320 other day
01:11:28.660 that I'm
01:11:29.380 testing.
01:11:30.240 All right.
01:11:30.700 Now,
01:11:31.020 here's a
01:11:31.860 lifestyle tip
01:11:33.700 that I
01:11:34.240 think you
01:11:34.740 should take
01:11:35.160 to heart.
01:11:37.400 It has
01:11:38.040 to do
01:11:38.300 with
01:11:38.500 continuous
01:11:39.380 A-B
01:11:40.280 testing
01:11:40.740 for your
01:11:41.380 main
01:11:41.620 things.
01:11:42.360 So,
01:11:42.580 your main
01:11:42.860 three things
01:11:43.460 would be
01:11:43.980 diet,
01:11:44.600 exercise,
01:11:44.940 and sleep.
01:11:46.680 All right.
01:11:47.000 If you get
01:11:47.460 diet,
01:11:47.860 exercise,
01:11:48.320 and sleep
01:11:48.740 right,
01:11:49.580 then everything
01:11:50.220 else is going
01:11:50.780 to work out
01:11:51.200 better for
01:11:51.640 you.
01:11:52.200 So,
01:11:52.760 I'm
01:11:52.920 continually
01:11:53.480 experimenting
01:11:54.220 with better
01:11:55.320 ways to
01:11:55.940 eat and
01:11:56.840 better ways
01:11:57.280 to exercise,
01:11:57.940 better ways
01:11:58.240 to sleep.
01:11:58.940 And I
01:11:59.200 saw this
01:11:59.580 tip from
01:12:00.620 some alleged
01:12:01.640 expert on
01:12:02.500 social media,
01:12:03.640 and I
01:12:03.900 wondered if
01:12:04.240 you'd heard
01:12:04.640 it before,
01:12:05.880 and I
01:12:06.160 wondered if
01:12:06.540 you'd
01:12:06.720 tried it.
01:12:07.460 So,
01:12:07.720 I tried it
01:12:08.200 for the last
01:12:08.580 two nights,
01:12:09.200 and it
01:12:10.560 worked exactly
01:12:11.400 as the
01:12:11.860 expert
01:12:12.260 predicted.
01:12:13.840 But it's
01:12:14.160 only two
01:12:14.540 nights,
01:12:15.060 so I
01:12:15.360 have to
01:12:15.580 do it
01:12:15.840 more.
01:12:16.120 And it
01:12:16.280 goes like
01:12:16.640 this,
01:12:17.560 that if
01:12:17.980 you eat
01:12:18.580 within three
01:12:19.520 hours of
01:12:20.020 going to
01:12:20.420 bed,
01:12:21.340 you won't
01:12:21.820 sleep well.
01:12:23.840 Have you
01:12:24.100 ever heard
01:12:24.380 that?
01:12:25.880 That it
01:12:26.240 has to do
01:12:27.020 with having
01:12:27.980 carbs in
01:12:28.580 your system,
01:12:29.320 you don't
01:12:29.680 sleep well
01:12:30.200 with carbs?
01:12:31.880 So,
01:12:32.200 you have
01:12:32.540 heard that.
01:12:33.380 So,
01:12:33.940 the night
01:12:35.220 before last,
01:12:36.820 I tested
01:12:37.580 that.
01:12:38.120 So,
01:12:38.440 I made
01:12:38.660 sure that
01:12:39.020 I was
01:12:39.220 done
01:12:39.460 eating.
01:12:39.840 I didn't
01:12:40.060 eat anything
01:12:40.660 after 6.30
01:12:41.600 at night.
01:12:42.760 And I
01:12:43.240 had the
01:12:43.500 best sleep
01:12:44.040 that I've
01:12:44.420 had in
01:12:45.060 weeks.
01:12:46.940 So,
01:12:47.440 then the
01:12:47.680 next day,
01:12:48.580 because my
01:12:49.320 schedule got
01:12:50.220 ahead of me,
01:12:50.860 I couldn't
01:12:51.380 do that.
01:12:51.980 So,
01:12:52.220 I ate
01:12:52.380 dinner at
01:12:53.060 closer to
01:12:54.260 8.30 or
01:12:55.120 9 o'clock
01:12:55.620 at night,
01:12:56.280 and then I
01:12:57.240 tried,
01:12:57.800 unsuccessfully,
01:12:58.640 to go to
01:12:59.000 bed like an 0.99
01:12:59.580 hour and a
01:12:59.880 half later,
01:13:01.140 and had a
01:13:01.840 terrible night
01:13:02.280 of sleep.
01:13:03.660 So,
01:13:04.060 I've tried
01:13:04.340 it twice,
01:13:05.280 and so far
01:13:05.940 it's 100%.
01:13:06.840 That
01:13:08.300 when I
01:13:09.280 ate was
01:13:10.620 completely
01:13:11.180 predictive.
01:13:12.000 And here's
01:13:12.420 the weird
01:13:12.680 thing.
01:13:13.760 That one
01:13:14.420 good night
01:13:14.920 of sleep is
01:13:15.420 the first
01:13:15.940 one.
01:13:17.260 And I
01:13:17.800 never
01:13:18.400 don't eat
01:13:19.920 for three
01:13:20.340 hours before
01:13:20.920 bed.
01:13:22.060 Like,
01:13:22.440 I'm generally
01:13:23.100 snacking all
01:13:23.840 night.
01:13:24.600 Often,
01:13:25.180 the last thing
01:13:25.660 I do before
01:13:26.160 I go to bed,
01:13:26.940 because I don't
01:13:27.540 like to be
01:13:27.920 hungry,
01:13:29.040 like that
01:13:29.440 wakes me up
01:13:29.960 too.
01:13:30.340 So,
01:13:30.640 often,
01:13:30.940 the last
01:13:31.300 thing I do
01:13:31.700 before I go
01:13:32.140 to bed
01:13:32.380 is eat.
01:13:33.320 Do you
01:13:33.880 do that?
01:13:35.840 All right,
01:13:36.400 so here's
01:13:36.760 what I'm
01:13:36.980 going to do.
01:13:37.560 I'm not
01:13:38.140 claiming this
01:13:38.740 works,
01:13:39.860 because I
01:13:40.320 don't know.
01:13:41.360 What I'm
01:13:41.940 claiming is,
01:13:42.680 is really
01:13:43.220 smart to
01:13:43.940 test everything
01:13:44.680 that's easy
01:13:45.200 to test,
01:13:46.240 with an
01:13:46.860 emphasis on
01:13:47.600 easy to
01:13:48.140 test.
01:13:49.220 This is one
01:13:50.020 of the best
01:13:50.560 life advices
01:13:51.900 you'll ever
01:13:52.360 get.
01:13:53.800 Continually
01:13:54.280 test in the
01:13:55.500 domains of
01:13:56.180 exercise,
01:13:57.800 sleep,
01:13:58.300 and diet.
01:13:58.900 Never stop.
01:14:00.160 Test,
01:14:00.380 test,
01:14:00.560 test,
01:14:00.840 test,
01:14:00.880 test,
01:14:01.120 test.
01:14:02.060 But always
01:14:02.860 test the
01:14:03.440 things that
01:14:03.900 are easy
01:14:04.400 to test,
01:14:05.040 but could
01:14:05.340 have a
01:14:05.640 big impact
01:14:06.200 first.
01:14:07.080 You don't
01:14:07.460 want to
01:14:07.680 test the
01:14:08.060 big things.
01:14:09.860 I'm not
01:14:10.420 sure I
01:14:10.760 would,
01:14:12.220 oh,
01:14:12.620 I don't
01:14:12.820 know.
01:14:13.860 I guess
01:14:14.600 something like
01:14:15.140 going on a
01:14:15.880 fast for
01:14:16.640 one day,
01:14:18.080 seems like
01:14:18.620 that's small
01:14:19.140 enough you
01:14:19.540 could test
01:14:19.980 that,
01:14:20.320 not much
01:14:20.760 of a
01:14:20.960 downside.
01:14:22.360 So,
01:14:22.940 you saw
01:14:23.420 when I
01:14:23.680 tried to
01:14:25.960 solve my
01:14:26.420 own medical
01:14:26.880 problems,
01:14:28.160 I filled
01:14:28.760 my whiteboard
01:14:29.400 with all
01:14:29.780 the things
01:14:30.220 it could
01:14:30.600 be.
01:14:31.580 And some
01:14:31.880 of them
01:14:32.080 were tough
01:14:32.540 stuff,
01:14:33.180 like endocrine
01:14:34.400 problem.
01:14:36.860 If it's an 0.57
01:14:37.680 endocrine
01:14:38.200 problem,
01:14:39.280 you know,
01:14:40.820 it's going
01:14:41.080 to be
01:14:41.240 testing doctors
01:14:42.560 and trying
01:14:43.420 drugs and
01:14:44.240 God knows
01:14:44.980 what,
01:14:45.560 right?
01:14:46.480 But of all
01:14:47.280 the things
01:14:47.660 that I wrote
01:14:48.200 down that
01:14:48.640 it might
01:14:49.020 be,
01:14:50.040 one of the
01:14:50.700 possibilities
01:14:51.220 was my
01:14:52.360 blood pressure
01:14:53.080 meds were
01:14:53.660 the problem.
01:14:55.160 Now,
01:14:55.620 it turns out
01:14:56.040 that was the
01:14:56.420 easiest thing
01:14:56.960 to test,
01:14:57.520 test because
01:14:58.540 I simply
01:14:58.980 just skipped
01:14:59.900 taking them
01:15:00.340 for one
01:15:00.660 day,
01:15:01.440 which I
01:15:02.180 knew was
01:15:02.540 safe enough.
01:15:03.100 I researched
01:15:03.660 that if you
01:15:04.180 miss it for
01:15:04.560 one day,
01:15:05.140 that's not
01:15:05.480 a risk.
01:15:06.900 It is a
01:15:07.820 risk if you
01:15:08.840 skip it for,
01:15:10.260 let's say,
01:15:10.800 more than one
01:15:11.340 day.
01:15:12.200 I don't know
01:15:12.860 how much the
01:15:13.400 risk ramps up,
01:15:14.320 but if you go
01:15:15.320 a week,
01:15:16.540 I'm told there's
01:15:17.720 a bounce-back
01:15:18.340 effect,
01:15:18.960 and I don't
01:15:19.400 know how
01:15:19.680 dangerous that
01:15:20.240 would be.
01:15:20.540 I'm going
01:15:23.940 to go
01:15:24.160 somewhere really
01:15:24.740 dangerous here
01:15:25.380 in a moment.
01:15:28.300 I'm going
01:15:28.820 to switch
01:15:29.180 gears.
01:15:30.820 Let me tell
01:15:31.500 you something
01:15:31.900 I did
01:15:32.360 yesterday that
01:15:34.060 blew my
01:15:34.940 fucking mind, 0.99
01:15:36.720 and I need
01:15:37.580 some help.
01:15:38.220 I'm going
01:15:38.440 to ask the
01:15:38.960 internet brain,
01:15:39.880 the collective
01:15:40.540 intelligence,
01:15:41.240 to help me
01:15:41.620 out,
01:15:42.020 because I
01:15:42.320 sort of
01:15:42.600 reached a
01:15:43.500 cap of
01:15:44.080 what I
01:15:44.340 can do
01:15:44.660 on my
01:15:44.980 own.
01:15:46.680 When I
01:15:47.280 decided to
01:15:47.980 experiment by
01:15:49.680 stopping
01:15:50.380 my blood
01:15:51.060 pressure
01:15:51.360 meds,
01:15:52.720 the first
01:15:53.420 thing I
01:15:53.740 wondered is
01:15:54.240 whether it's
01:15:54.720 dangerous,
01:15:55.780 right?
01:15:56.360 Is it
01:15:56.700 dangerous to
01:15:57.360 skip one
01:15:59.080 day?
01:15:59.460 I figured
01:15:59.880 no,
01:16:00.980 but I
01:16:01.340 didn't know
01:16:01.640 how long
01:16:02.060 I could
01:16:02.360 go before
01:16:02.840 it was
01:16:03.060 dangerous.
01:16:04.060 So I
01:16:04.660 looked it
01:16:05.000 up,
01:16:05.880 and I
01:16:06.920 didn't get
01:16:07.220 a clean
01:16:07.720 answer,
01:16:08.140 but then I
01:16:08.540 thought,
01:16:08.920 well,
01:16:09.580 my blood
01:16:10.320 pressure is
01:16:11.060 not super
01:16:11.740 high,
01:16:13.360 you know,
01:16:13.700 down to
01:16:14.160 like 130
01:16:15.180 over 84
01:16:16.080 or something,
01:16:17.180 and I
01:16:17.680 thought to
01:16:17.960 myself,
01:16:19.040 okay,
01:16:19.400 is that
01:16:19.680 dangerous?
01:16:21.200 Do we
01:16:21.640 know the
01:16:22.140 science
01:16:22.620 says for
01:16:23.640 sure that
01:16:25.320 for the
01:16:26.500 average
01:16:26.840 person,
01:16:28.380 that being
01:16:28.900 a little
01:16:29.240 bit high,
01:16:30.000 134 over,
01:16:31.140 let's say,
01:16:31.460 84,
01:16:32.900 is that
01:16:33.360 going to
01:16:33.520 be dangerous?
01:16:34.480 And so
01:16:34.860 here's what
01:16:35.240 I did.
01:16:35.740 I googled it.
01:16:37.760 Now,
01:16:38.180 if you
01:16:38.500 google that,
01:16:39.160 don't you
01:16:39.440 think you're
01:16:39.860 going to
01:16:40.020 get an
01:16:40.800 obviously
01:16:41.360 clean,
01:16:42.400 clear answer?
01:16:43.860 Yes or
01:16:44.280 no?
01:16:44.880 Do you
01:16:45.240 think that
01:16:45.760 the science
01:16:46.340 of blood
01:16:46.820 pressure and
01:16:47.600 blood pressure
01:16:48.180 medication is
01:16:49.820 settled to
01:16:50.540 the point
01:16:50.960 where if
01:16:51.980 I ask it
01:16:52.640 what blood
01:16:53.200 pressure should
01:16:53.860 be treated,
01:16:55.080 there'll be a
01:16:55.640 clean,
01:16:56.240 clear answer
01:16:56.880 with a
01:16:57.660 consensus?
01:16:59.520 Let me tell
01:17:00.260 you what my
01:17:00.640 experience was.
01:17:01.920 So I googled it
01:17:02.860 and I found
01:17:03.540 a research
01:17:05.480 that looked at
01:17:06.960 other research
01:17:07.760 and it went
01:17:09.120 through,
01:17:09.680 you know,
01:17:10.020 what everybody
01:17:10.600 says about
01:17:11.400 what's dangerous
01:17:12.080 and what's not.
01:17:13.420 And then,
01:17:13.900 since I couldn't
01:17:14.680 understand all the
01:17:15.480 science,
01:17:15.900 I do what I
01:17:16.980 always do,
01:17:17.400 I skipped to
01:17:17.860 the conclusion.
01:17:19.720 So this is
01:17:20.960 not what it
01:17:21.480 actually said,
01:17:22.580 I'm going to
01:17:22.960 make this
01:17:23.380 barred up,
01:17:24.460 but this is
01:17:25.000 how it felt.
01:17:26.800 This study
01:17:27.540 says this,
01:17:28.640 this study
01:17:29.200 says this,
01:17:30.300 this study
01:17:30.780 says this,
01:17:32.280 and then the
01:17:33.760 conclusion said
01:17:34.580 this is the
01:17:35.800 national guideline.
01:17:36.880 What I was
01:17:37.160 looking at was
01:17:37.640 an Australian
01:17:38.260 study,
01:17:39.440 and then the
01:17:40.220 conclusion was
01:17:41.000 here's the
01:17:42.080 Australian guideline.
01:17:43.960 Do you see
01:17:44.280 what's missing?
01:17:44.760 They never
01:17:46.260 connected the
01:17:47.300 research to
01:17:47.980 the guideline.
01:17:49.980 They showed
01:17:51.060 the research,
01:17:52.520 and then they
01:17:52.980 said here's
01:17:53.440 the guideline,
01:17:54.640 and nowhere
01:17:55.360 there did they
01:17:56.240 say directly
01:17:56.940 this research
01:17:58.340 supports the
01:17:59.160 guideline,
01:17:59.920 because you
01:18:00.780 know what?
01:18:01.680 It didn't.
01:18:02.920 It didn't
01:18:04.480 disavow the
01:18:06.060 guideline,
01:18:06.740 but it also
01:18:07.580 didn't support
01:18:08.180 it.
01:18:10.000 And so
01:18:10.360 instead of
01:18:10.780 just saying
01:18:11.160 that directly,
01:18:12.780 it just
01:18:13.900 changed the
01:18:14.700 subject.
01:18:16.780 And so I
01:18:17.460 read another
01:18:17.920 one.
01:18:18.140 I thought,
01:18:18.440 well,
01:18:18.540 that's weird.
01:18:19.920 So I read
01:18:20.360 another one,
01:18:21.340 and sure
01:18:21.940 enough,
01:18:22.260 it's like,
01:18:22.660 blah, blah,
01:18:23.040 blah, this
01:18:23.600 is what the
01:18:24.040 science says,
01:18:25.200 and then the
01:18:25.760 conclusion was,
01:18:27.040 Merry Christmas.
01:18:28.320 Now, it
01:18:28.660 didn't say
01:18:29.020 Merry Christmas.
01:18:29.820 I'm making
01:18:30.240 that up.
01:18:31.380 But what it
01:18:32.080 didn't say is
01:18:32.780 something related
01:18:33.520 to what I
01:18:34.280 just read,
01:18:35.160 the science.
01:18:36.680 and so I
01:18:41.300 ask you this
01:18:41.900 question.
01:18:43.440 Is blood
01:18:44.600 pressure
01:18:45.060 medication
01:18:45.900 bullshit?
01:18:49.420 Now, let
01:18:50.660 me be very
01:18:51.180 clear.
01:18:51.760 I'm positive
01:18:52.620 that for some
01:18:54.180 people it keeps
01:18:54.880 them alive.
01:18:55.640 Can we all
01:18:56.020 agree on that?
01:18:57.460 I'm positive,
01:18:58.960 I'm not a
01:19:00.060 doctor, but I'm
01:19:01.460 positive there's
01:19:02.260 some people in
01:19:02.820 some situations
01:19:03.740 that it must
01:19:04.840 keep them
01:19:05.440 alive.
01:19:06.440 I think my
01:19:06.920 father might
01:19:07.400 have been one
01:19:07.760 of those,
01:19:08.180 actually.
01:19:09.640 Yeah, some
01:19:10.120 people say it
01:19:10.680 saved your
01:19:11.020 life, etc.
01:19:11.620 So I think
01:19:11.980 so.
01:19:12.580 But let me
01:19:13.360 ask you this.
01:19:14.600 Do you
01:19:14.860 think science
01:19:15.580 can tell me
01:19:16.520 specifically,
01:19:19.560 I'm at my
01:19:20.720 ideal BMI,
01:19:23.660 I'm a
01:19:24.820 pescatarian
01:19:25.540 for decades,
01:19:27.040 or vegetarian,
01:19:28.040 pescatarian,
01:19:29.360 I don't drink
01:19:30.500 alcohol,
01:19:31.400 I don't smoke
01:19:32.240 tobacco,
01:19:33.740 do you
01:19:35.000 think that
01:19:35.500 science knows
01:19:36.460 whether I
01:19:37.060 should take
01:19:37.460 blood pressure
01:19:38.080 medication?
01:19:39.280 What do you
01:19:39.600 think?
01:19:40.460 I think there's
01:19:41.300 a guideline,
01:19:42.380 and I think
01:19:42.860 they told me
01:19:43.380 I should,
01:19:44.380 and I think
01:19:45.020 if I asked
01:19:45.540 a hundred
01:19:45.820 times,
01:19:46.280 they'd say
01:19:46.600 yes.
01:19:47.640 I think if
01:19:48.340 I asked
01:19:48.620 a hundred
01:19:48.940 doctors,
01:19:49.480 a hundred
01:19:49.680 doctors would
01:19:50.260 say yes.
01:19:51.460 But do you
01:19:51.840 think the
01:19:52.180 science supports
01:19:52.820 it?
01:19:55.160 Because if
01:19:55.780 it does
01:19:56.020 support it,
01:19:56.860 can you
01:19:57.360 show me
01:19:57.860 where that
01:19:58.300 is?
01:19:59.400 Because I
01:20:00.180 looked and
01:20:00.680 I didn't
01:20:00.980 see it.
01:20:02.540 Is it
01:20:03.140 missing for
01:20:05.560 a reason?
01:20:12.180 So here's
01:20:13.420 why I
01:20:14.740 think this
01:20:15.240 is
01:20:15.700 important.
01:20:20.620 What happened
01:20:21.520 when I took
01:20:22.020 blood pressure
01:20:22.620 medications?
01:20:23.320 The first
01:20:23.680 thing I did
01:20:24.220 was I didn't
01:20:24.940 want to
01:20:25.400 exercise.
01:20:27.000 You got
01:20:27.340 that?
01:20:27.980 The first
01:20:28.680 thing I did
01:20:29.240 on blood
01:20:29.780 pressure
01:20:30.200 medications
01:20:31.020 is I
01:20:31.440 didn't
01:20:31.660 want to
01:20:31.940 exercise.
01:20:32.920 So I
01:20:33.260 did less.
01:20:34.560 I tried to
01:20:35.340 push through
01:20:35.740 as hard as
01:20:36.180 I can
01:20:36.460 because I'm
01:20:36.740 pretty stubborn,
01:20:37.760 but it was
01:20:38.220 still less.
01:20:40.300 Do you
01:20:40.520 know what
01:20:40.760 else I
01:20:41.180 felt?
01:20:42.060 I felt I
01:20:42.800 didn't want
01:20:43.260 to live.
01:20:45.240 And that
01:20:45.560 was just
01:20:45.900 the medication.
01:20:47.160 As soon as I
01:20:47.680 was off it,
01:20:48.180 boom,
01:20:48.500 went away.
01:20:49.600 It made me
01:20:50.280 not want to
01:20:50.900 live.
01:20:51.140 What is the
01:20:52.960 life expectancy
01:20:53.860 of people who
01:20:54.680 don't want to
01:20:55.220 live and
01:20:56.280 can't exercise
01:20:57.100 and can't
01:20:58.040 enjoy life?
01:20:58.680 And their
01:20:59.760 libido takes
01:21:01.060 a hit.
01:21:03.080 Are you
01:21:03.700 telling me
01:21:04.100 those blood
01:21:04.580 pressure
01:21:04.980 medications
01:21:05.620 aren't
01:21:05.940 killing
01:21:06.180 people?
01:21:07.660 Because I
01:21:08.280 just described
01:21:08.980 something that
01:21:09.540 does kill
01:21:09.960 people.
01:21:11.880 If you
01:21:12.720 gave a
01:21:13.160 pill to
01:21:13.500 somebody who
01:21:13.920 was otherwise
01:21:14.440 perfectly
01:21:15.020 healthy and
01:21:16.100 the only
01:21:16.520 changes it
01:21:17.160 made is it
01:21:17.780 made them
01:21:18.100 not want to
01:21:18.620 exercise,
01:21:19.620 gain weight
01:21:20.240 easily,
01:21:20.820 not care about
01:21:21.500 living,
01:21:21.980 lose their
01:21:22.380 libido,
01:21:23.500 you're
01:21:23.740 telling me
01:21:24.000 that person
01:21:24.420 isn't going
01:21:24.780 to die
01:21:25.120 sooner?
01:21:27.320 I think
01:21:27.960 they'll die
01:21:28.340 sooner because
01:21:28.660 I don't
01:21:29.020 give a fuck
01:21:29.560 about living.
01:21:31.220 I didn't.
01:21:32.360 I honestly
01:21:32.980 didn't care
01:21:33.460 about living.
01:21:35.120 And I
01:21:35.500 don't mean
01:21:35.840 there's no
01:21:36.260 hyperbole
01:21:36.760 there.
01:21:37.760 When I
01:21:38.300 was on
01:21:38.620 that drug
01:21:39.160 I had
01:21:40.040 no interest
01:21:40.800 in being
01:21:41.160 alive.
01:21:41.660 None.
01:21:42.600 None.
01:21:43.260 Now
01:21:43.540 fortunately
01:21:44.820 my executive
01:21:45.820 function of
01:21:47.320 my brain
01:21:47.700 was still
01:21:48.140 intact and
01:21:49.380 the executive
01:21:49.940 function told
01:21:50.700 me to
01:21:51.000 wait it
01:21:51.320 out.
01:21:52.260 Right?
01:21:53.020 So I
01:21:53.440 was overriding
01:21:54.300 all the rest
01:21:55.740 of my brain
01:21:56.380 with my
01:21:56.920 executive function
01:21:57.800 but just
01:21:58.720 barely.
01:22:00.360 Just
01:22:00.800 fucking
01:22:01.180 barely.
01:22:02.380 Right?
01:22:03.660 And I'm
01:22:04.240 not sure
01:22:04.640 if everybody
01:22:05.480 could do
01:22:05.880 that.
01:22:06.880 I'm sort
01:22:07.580 of unusually
01:22:08.260 mentally
01:22:08.640 strong I
01:22:09.420 like to
01:22:09.760 think.
01:22:10.540 That's
01:22:10.860 probably
01:22:11.080 just my
01:22:11.460 own
01:22:11.600 illusion.
01:22:11.940 if you
01:22:15.480 can skip
01:22:15.900 the meds
01:22:16.400 for a
01:22:16.660 day you
01:22:17.020 didn't
01:22:17.260 get better
01:22:17.700 in one
01:22:18.100 day.
01:22:20.760 I don't
01:22:21.380 know what
01:22:21.580 that means
01:22:21.900 exactly.
01:22:24.400 Yeah
01:22:24.860 everybody's
01:22:25.380 different.
01:22:25.920 So starting
01:22:26.420 with the
01:22:26.860 everybody's
01:22:27.400 different
01:22:27.660 theory do
01:22:29.020 you think
01:22:29.460 that I
01:22:30.040 personally
01:22:30.520 am in
01:22:31.040 danger
01:22:31.460 more in
01:22:34.400 danger
01:22:34.820 or let's
01:22:36.040 say this
01:22:36.320 exact case
01:22:37.040 your blood
01:22:37.920 pressure is
01:22:38.480 134 over
01:22:39.460 84 which
01:22:41.020 is high.
01:22:42.020 You'd want
01:22:42.460 it 120
01:22:42.920 over 80.
01:22:46.200 So it is
01:22:46.880 high but
01:22:47.260 it's not
01:22:47.520 super high.
01:22:48.940 It's just
01:22:49.360 high-ish.
01:22:51.180 You tell
01:22:51.540 me that
01:22:52.160 for sure
01:22:53.740 that's better
01:22:54.260 than taking
01:22:54.760 a pill
01:22:55.220 that removes
01:22:56.580 my will
01:22:57.060 to live.
01:22:58.780 It's not
01:22:59.120 even close
01:22:59.620 is it?
01:23:00.740 Let me be
01:23:01.420 clear.
01:23:02.100 So I
01:23:02.700 haven't tried
01:23:03.140 all blood
01:23:03.560 pressure
01:23:03.860 medications
01:23:04.420 I'll
01:23:04.680 probably
01:23:05.020 I'm going
01:23:05.980 to experiment
01:23:06.460 to see what
01:23:06.940 I can do
01:23:07.280 without it
01:23:07.720 for a little
01:23:08.140 while but
01:23:08.840 probably
01:23:09.740 probably
01:23:11.520 I'll go
01:23:12.120 back and
01:23:12.560 maybe try
01:23:13.100 something that
01:23:13.740 I think
01:23:14.440 has less
01:23:15.040 deleterious
01:23:16.380 effects.
01:23:17.600 But here's
01:23:18.500 the other
01:23:18.780 scary part.
01:23:20.400 I went
01:23:21.300 months
01:23:22.260 without knowing
01:23:23.240 it was the
01:23:23.680 blood pressure
01:23:24.220 meds.
01:23:25.400 Do you know
01:23:25.680 what I thought
01:23:26.040 it was?
01:23:27.300 Or here's
01:23:27.920 another
01:23:28.400 learning
01:23:28.980 point.
01:23:30.960 Let me
01:23:31.380 teach you
01:23:31.740 something.
01:23:32.640 When I
01:23:33.220 went public
01:23:33.880 and said
01:23:35.100 that I
01:23:35.440 had extreme
01:23:37.280 fatigue
01:23:37.960 everyone
01:23:39.140 who had
01:23:39.660 a pet
01:23:40.060 peeve
01:23:40.560 or a
01:23:41.540 pet
01:23:41.720 theory
01:23:42.100 told me
01:23:43.100 they were
01:23:43.420 sure
01:23:43.700 what
01:23:43.920 caused
01:23:44.260 it.
01:23:45.940 So the
01:23:46.580 people who
01:23:47.040 thought
01:23:47.240 long
01:23:47.560 COVID
01:23:47.880 was
01:23:48.100 real
01:23:48.320 said
01:23:48.620 oh you
01:23:48.940 definitely
01:23:49.220 got
01:23:49.420 long
01:23:49.660 COVID
01:23:49.920 I've
01:23:50.180 got
01:23:50.340 that
01:23:50.560 too.
01:23:51.420 The
01:23:51.620 people
01:23:51.880 who thought
01:23:52.180 vaccination
01:23:52.640 is
01:23:53.040 injured
01:23:53.280 people
01:23:53.580 said
01:23:53.860 that's
01:23:54.280 a
01:23:54.420 clear
01:23:54.680 example
01:23:55.100 of a
01:23:55.500 vaccination
01:23:55.840 injury.
01:23:56.900 No
01:23:57.180 doubt
01:23:57.400 about it
01:23:57.760 Scott
01:23:57.980 that's
01:23:58.280 what
01:23:58.420 you
01:23:58.520 got.
01:23:59.140 The
01:23:59.580 people
01:23:59.900 who
01:24:00.140 thought
01:24:00.440 vegetarian
01:24:01.140 diets
01:24:01.680 are
01:24:01.840 bad
01:24:02.060 for
01:24:02.280 you
01:24:02.440 and
01:24:02.600 rob
01:24:02.960 your
01:24:03.200 strength
01:24:03.660 they
01:24:04.260 said
01:24:04.540 eat
01:24:04.940 some
01:24:05.100 meat
01:24:05.360 damn
01:24:05.640 it
01:24:05.820 that's
01:24:06.500 all
01:24:06.600 you
01:24:06.740 need
01:24:06.920 to
01:24:07.060 do
01:24:07.300 eat
01:24:07.800 some
01:24:07.960 beef
01:24:08.240 you'll
01:24:08.500 be
01:24:08.600 better.
01:24:10.280 The
01:24:10.520 people
01:24:12.400 who
01:24:12.960 think
01:24:13.880 that
01:24:14.080 testosterone
01:24:14.660 may
01:24:15.900 have
01:24:16.040 helped
01:24:16.260 them
01:24:16.560 said
01:24:17.680 it's
01:24:17.960 obvious
01:24:18.260 that
01:24:18.500 you're
01:24:18.660 low
01:24:18.920 testosterone
01:24:19.540 Scott
01:24:20.020 get
01:24:20.360 your
01:24:20.660 testosterone
01:24:21.920 tested.
01:24:23.680 Now
01:24:23.840 right
01:24:25.360 many of
01:24:26.000 you are
01:24:26.180 guilty.
01:24:26.940 Now
01:24:27.040 people
01:24:27.320 had all
01:24:27.640 kinds
01:24:27.840 of
01:24:27.980 theories
01:24:28.260 but
01:24:29.100 here's
01:24:29.980 what
01:24:30.160 you
01:24:30.300 should
01:24:30.500 learn.
01:24:30.820 they
01:24:31.820 were
01:24:32.020 all
01:24:32.280 pretty
01:24:32.820 damn
01:24:33.320 certain
01:24:33.700 that
01:24:33.960 they
01:24:34.100 were
01:24:34.240 right.
01:24:35.860 Just
01:24:36.420 as
01:24:36.680 certain
01:24:36.980 they
01:24:37.260 are
01:24:37.440 that
01:24:37.640 their
01:24:37.840 neighbor
01:24:38.120 who
01:24:38.320 died
01:24:38.740 of
01:24:39.320 a
01:24:39.440 vaccine
01:24:39.720 injury
01:24:40.100 just
01:24:40.900 as
01:24:41.120 certain
01:24:41.400 they
01:24:41.740 are
01:24:42.020 of
01:24:42.300 everything
01:24:42.720 else
01:24:43.040 that's
01:24:43.260 not
01:24:43.500 true.
01:24:44.660 We
01:24:44.940 get
01:24:45.500 really
01:24:45.880 certain
01:24:46.300 of
01:24:46.580 things
01:24:46.800 that
01:24:46.940 aren't
01:24:47.120 true
01:24:47.320 really
01:24:47.660 fast.
01:24:52.800 By
01:24:53.200 the
01:24:53.980 way
01:24:54.100 I
01:24:54.240 appreciate
01:24:54.600 the
01:24:54.860 suggestions.
01:24:56.000 That's
01:24:56.300 not a
01:24:56.600 complaint.
01:24:57.640 I
01:24:57.740 do
01:24:57.880 appreciate
01:24:58.320 the
01:24:58.560 suggestions.
01:25:00.820 So
01:25:03.380 somebody
01:25:03.760 is
01:25:03.880 suggesting
01:25:04.260 here
01:25:04.560 that
01:25:04.780 I
01:25:04.920 should
01:25:05.060 try
01:25:05.340 different
01:25:05.880 blood
01:25:06.320 pressure
01:25:06.680 meds
01:25:07.240 to
01:25:08.040 see
01:25:08.240 which
01:25:08.460 ones
01:25:08.720 give
01:25:08.880 me
01:25:09.000 side
01:25:09.240 effects.
01:25:09.780 And
01:25:09.880 here's
01:25:10.120 the
01:25:10.240 problem.
01:25:11.300 I
01:25:11.520 thought
01:25:11.800 I
01:25:11.940 was
01:25:12.100 doing
01:25:12.340 that.
01:25:13.740 That's
01:25:14.020 what I
01:25:14.260 thought
01:25:14.400 I
01:25:14.500 was
01:25:14.620 doing.
01:25:15.140 And
01:25:15.340 it
01:25:15.460 almost
01:25:15.840 killed
01:25:16.100 me.
01:25:17.920 I
01:25:18.440 didn't
01:25:18.780 know
01:25:19.160 that
01:25:20.060 the
01:25:20.240 blood
01:25:20.440 pressure
01:25:20.780 meds
01:25:21.100 were
01:25:21.260 the
01:25:21.460 cause
01:25:21.940 of
01:25:22.180 the
01:25:22.580 way
01:25:22.740 I
01:25:22.880 felt
01:25:23.160 because
01:25:23.780 it
01:25:23.920 doesn't
01:25:24.160 happen
01:25:24.460 the
01:25:24.840 day
01:25:25.040 you
01:25:25.220 take
01:25:25.480 it.
01:25:26.440 It
01:25:26.640 must
01:25:27.040 build
01:25:27.340 up
01:25:27.680 because
01:25:28.640 on
01:25:28.840 day
01:25:29.040 one
01:25:29.300 I
01:25:29.440 didn't
01:25:29.580 have
01:25:29.760 any
01:25:29.940 of
01:25:30.060 those
01:25:30.280 problems.
01:25:31.660 It
01:25:31.680 just
01:25:32.460 got
01:25:32.700 more
01:25:32.960 and
01:25:33.060 more
01:25:33.180 and
01:25:33.260 more.
01:25:34.020 Somebody
01:25:34.300 says
01:25:34.540 low
01:25:34.800 carbs.
01:25:36.460 Everybody
01:25:36.940 has
01:25:37.240 their
01:25:37.420 own
01:25:37.720 theory.
01:25:39.220 But
01:25:39.420 all
01:25:40.060 of
01:25:40.200 your
01:25:40.340 theories
01:25:40.700 are
01:25:40.920 wrong
01:25:41.220 if
01:25:41.520 I
01:25:41.660 miss
01:25:41.860 one
01:25:42.120 pill
01:25:42.320 by
01:25:42.500 one
01:25:42.740 day
01:25:42.960 and
01:25:43.180 all
01:25:43.440 of
01:25:43.540 my
01:25:43.660 problems
01:25:44.000 are
01:25:44.200 solved.
01:25:45.380 So
01:25:45.460 now
01:25:45.680 it's
01:25:45.840 been
01:25:46.020 several
01:25:46.460 days.
01:25:47.600 I
01:25:47.900 don't
01:25:48.000 know
01:25:48.120 a
01:25:48.240 week
01:25:48.380 or
01:25:48.500 something.
01:25:49.300 So
01:25:49.400 it's
01:25:49.500 been
01:25:49.640 several
01:25:49.980 days
01:25:50.440 and
01:25:51.220 these
01:25:51.480 are
01:25:51.600 the
01:25:51.760 only
01:25:52.040 several
01:25:52.420 days
01:25:52.740 of
01:25:52.920 good
01:25:53.140 life
01:25:53.440 I've
01:25:53.660 had
01:25:53.900 in
01:25:54.200 a
01:25:54.900 long
01:25:55.240 time.
01:25:57.120 Somebody
01:25:57.640 says
01:25:57.940 it's
01:25:58.100 all
01:25:58.260 in
01:25:58.400 your
01:25:58.500 head
01:25:58.660 that's
01:25:58.900 not
01:25:59.060 even
01:25:59.260 slightly
01:26:00.500 possible.
01:26:01.520 You'd
01:26:01.860 have
01:26:02.020 to
01:26:02.640 know
01:26:02.880 from
01:26:03.100 the
01:26:03.260 inside
01:26:03.660 how
01:26:04.460 dramatic
01:26:04.940 the
01:26:05.200 difference
01:26:05.480 is.
01:26:06.340 The
01:26:06.800 difference
01:26:07.160 is
01:26:07.380 between
01:26:07.660 not
01:26:07.960 being
01:26:08.160 able
01:26:08.360 to
01:26:08.520 walk
01:26:08.760 up
01:26:08.900 the
01:26:09.080 stairs
01:26:09.480 and
01:26:10.620 spontaneously
01:26:11.300 skipping.
01:26:14.200 It's
01:26:14.760 completely
01:26:15.200 different.
01:26:16.300 Like
01:26:16.420 spontaneously
01:26:17.100 I
01:26:17.600 think
01:26:17.760 I'll
01:26:17.860 just
01:26:18.080 skip
01:26:18.640 from
01:26:18.920 this
01:26:19.120 room
01:26:19.340 to
01:26:19.500 this
01:26:19.680 room.
01:26:20.660 There's
01:26:21.180 no
01:26:21.320 comparison.
01:26:22.480 That
01:26:22.680 was
01:26:22.920 not
01:26:23.180 in
01:26:23.360 my
01:26:23.540 head.
01:26:25.200 Definitely
01:26:25.580 not
01:26:25.840 in
01:26:25.940 my
01:26:26.040 head.
01:26:29.820 Low
01:26:30.340 carbs.
01:26:31.060 I'm
01:26:31.560 generally
01:26:31.920 a
01:26:32.320 low
01:26:33.040 carb
01:26:33.300 guy.
01:26:34.360 I'm
01:26:34.480 lower
01:26:34.700 carbs
01:26:35.060 than
01:26:35.200 most
01:26:35.400 people.
01:26:37.920 I'm
01:26:38.300 sort
01:26:38.500 of
01:26:38.660 fish
01:26:39.100 and
01:26:39.260 vegetable
01:26:39.600 kind
01:26:39.880 of
01:26:39.960 a
01:26:40.040 guy.
01:26:41.120 All
01:26:41.340 right.
01:26:41.580 That's
01:26:41.800 all
01:26:41.920 for
01:26:42.020 now.
01:26:42.740 I'm
01:26:42.920 going
01:26:42.960 to
01:26:43.040 say
01:26:43.240 goodbye
01:26:43.540 to
01:26:43.740 YouTube
01:26:44.040 for
01:26:44.300 now
01:26:44.540 and
01:26:44.920 I'll
01:26:45.040 talk
01:26:45.240 to
01:26:45.320 you
01:26:45.400 tomorrow.