Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 08, 2022


Episode 1921 Scott Adams： It's The End Of Democracy As We Know It, AKA A Normal Election Day


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per Minute

142.23688

Word Count

9,129

Sentence Count

747

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

19


Summary

The election is over, and now we have to deal with the inevitable end of democracy. Also, Elon Musk has a tortuous claim to a torturous word, and Harmeet Desai wants to know if you can sue for free speech.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization, but also the total
00:00:10.780 destruction of democracy. Some people call it a normal vote, but if you'd like to make
00:00:18.260 it a little more exciting, let's call it the destruction of democracy. I feel the same.
00:00:25.140 It's weird, but I know any moment now, any moment, the whole democracy is going to crumble
00:00:31.640 from all of the voting, I guess, but if you'd like to have a peak experience today, what
00:00:40.440 would it take? Well, it might take a brand new mug if you haven't, but if you don't have
00:00:46.280 that, it's still a great place to be, and all you need is any kind of a cupper mug or a
00:00:51.040 glass of tanker, chalice, stein, the canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it
00:00:56.920 with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure
00:01:01.780 of the dope being here today. The thing makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous
00:01:07.380 democracy. Sip. It happens now. Go.
00:01:16.340 Oh, democracy.
00:01:19.120 Well, enjoy it while you can, because as soon as the election is over, our democracy is
00:01:27.640 finished. And that should happen. Let's see. The election will be over by tonight. Tonight,
00:01:34.020 right? Because it's election. No, not tonight. Some of the votes will be counted maybe tomorrow
00:01:38.860 morning. Not tomorrow morning, but maybe sometime the next day we'll have all of the votes. No,
00:01:44.600 well, not really done by tomorrow, exactly. By tomorrow, I mean maybe November 14th or so.
00:01:52.660 Yeah. Roughly the 14th. We might have something like the end of democracy. I don't know if I
00:01:58.820 can wait that long for the end of democracy. Can you? I mean, I've been waiting for this
00:02:04.240 end of democracy for so long. I don't know if I can wait another week, but I guess we will.
00:02:12.060 Well, let's talk about all the fun things. The simulation is trying to send us a message,
00:02:18.780 but you have to know how to read it. When the owners or the creators of the simulation want
00:02:24.460 to send a message, it's usually, you know, it's not real obvious until you notice it and then it's
00:02:32.780 kind of obvious. So I'll tell you the message that they're sending us. It's just a little wink,
00:02:37.240 I'd call it. I tweeted this, that Biden opposes the fossil fuels industry and drilling. So he's
00:02:48.180 against the fossil fuel industry and drilling. But interestingly, the fossil fuel industry,
00:02:54.460 opposes fossil fuels and drilling. So you can have either fossil fuels and drilling, or you can
00:03:04.700 have a fossil fuel and drilling. You can have either one. I feel like that's just the simulation
00:03:12.780 saying, uh, uh, none of this is real. You know none of this is real. Watch this. Uh, uh, uh, all right.
00:03:24.020 Um, so as you know, uh, advertisers were leaving, uh, Twitter because they're mad that it might become,
00:03:32.700 uh, balanced again, or for the first time. And someone asked Musk on Twitter if he has a tortuous
00:03:41.420 claim to a tortious, how would you pronounce it? Tortious, right? T-O-R-T based on tort law.
00:03:54.540 Tortious, right? Or tortoise. It's one of those. It's one of those words that you can read and never
00:04:03.460 have to speak. If I could advise you, never try to pronounce that word in public. Because nobody's
00:04:12.180 going to know what you're talking about. And you're just going to look foolish if you get it wrong. So
00:04:16.180 don't do what I did. So it's a tortious claim. And, uh, Musk actually said yes.
00:04:22.820 Yes. So I don't know what a torturous, tortious claim is. And it's something about a tortoise.
00:04:31.700 But apparently it's a big deal and maybe it, it applies. But I don't really understand it. Somebody's
00:04:37.300 going to have to explain to me. Why can't advertisers do whatever the hell they want?
00:04:44.740 How could you have a claim? Now it's not a claim against the advertisers, right? It would be a claim
00:04:49.140 against some entities that were pushing the advertisers. Contract interference. Is that it?
00:04:56.660 Can I get a confirmation on that? Is it contract interference? I feel like you can interfere
00:05:03.380 with anything you want if it's free speech. Can't you interfere with any contract you want
00:05:10.580 as long as all you're doing is free speech? You can't. Interesting. Or are you saying no to something
00:05:17.540 else? Tortious just means you can sue? All right. Yeah. So I feel, I feel like we all have to listen to
00:05:30.580 Harmeet, uh, Dylan, find out what's going on. Uh, how many of you are following Harmeet?
00:05:38.100 Um, that was on my news to, or on my list to recommend to you. So if you, if you want to follow any of the,
00:05:46.180 the legal stuff, so one of the accounts you need to follow is, uh, Harmeet, Dylan. Uh, torts means
00:05:55.140 civil wrongs, yeah. Torish us. Torish us is how you say it, I'm told. All right. So the terms of service
00:06:02.820 is a contract, sure. But I feel like it should never be illegal to talk about things if you think
00:06:10.660 you're saying things that are real, right? As long as you believe what you're saying is real and
00:06:16.980 important, how in the world could that be illegal or even tortious if it's true? If it's true that
00:06:25.780 you believe it, I mean, you don't only have to believe it. It doesn't have to actually be true,
00:06:29.220 right? Your free speech is protected as long as you think you're saying the truth. I think,
00:06:35.300 right? I mean, short of crying fire in a theater, I guess. I don't know. Um, I guess we'll find out
00:06:44.020 more about that. In my opinion, the Republic is stronger than it has ever been. You know,
00:06:52.900 we always have this weird amnesia about history. You know that in the days of Abraham Lincoln,
00:07:00.660 the Republic was like barely functioning, just barely functioning. And there have been plenty
00:07:06.980 of times in our history when we barely, you know, were surviving in terms of the system.
00:07:14.100 But at the moment, uh, at the moment, I think it's as strong as it's ever been. Here's my argument.
00:07:21.060 Uh, interest in voting is at an all-time high. Would you agree? Would you agree that the interest
00:07:29.700 in voting and, and participating in the process is the highest it's ever been? Isn't it? Well,
00:07:36.980 I think it is. You know, it seems like it. Um, I would say that fake news is actually on the ropes.
00:07:44.420 It doesn't seem like it yet, but it definitely is. And there are two gigantic things that are
00:07:51.540 happening. One is that, um, CNN is just fact checking the piss out of Biden. They're just fact
00:07:58.260 checking him right to, right to his socks. They're, they're not holding back at all now. Right? And
00:08:05.060 that's, that's, that's new. It's totally new. It's welcome. And it's correct. And it strengthens
00:08:11.540 the Republic. That's a big, big, big deal because the left can't hide from CNN. The left can completely
00:08:19.060 hide from Fox news. They can't hide from CNN. That's a really big deal. Uh, the other big deal is Twitter
00:08:27.860 itself. Now, in my opinion, it's too early to say, but it certainly looks like Twitter is evolving into
00:08:35.380 a context giver, as opposed to our propaganda engine. Do you think that characterization is
00:08:42.980 fair? That at least that it seems to be the stated intention. And I see movement in that direction
00:08:49.300 to make Twitter a context provider, as opposed to telling you what to think and, you know, hiding
00:08:55.220 views and all that stuff. How big of a deal is that? Imagine if every fake news that, you know,
00:09:02.420 was important had a little note on it that gave you the context, you know, just the other side,
00:09:09.060 whatever's the argument on the other side, or just context. That really does change everything.
00:09:14.900 Imagine if you couldn't lie with impunity on Twitter anymore. I mean, you can still lie. It's just that
00:09:20.900 somebody would add a fact jacket. It would just hang there forever.
00:09:27.300 These are improvements in the system. They're enormous, enormous improvements. How about this?
00:09:36.660 Trump hysteria is way down. Would you agree? So after the January 6th, things sort of fizzled,
00:09:44.260 you know, that they were trying to, like, ball up as much of the remnants of the Trump, you know,
00:09:51.940 derangement as they could, try to package it up and make one more good push with the January 6th thing,
00:09:58.180 and it didn't work. It didn't move anybody. Remember my prediction that the longer Trump was out of office,
00:10:06.580 the better he would look. Best prediction ever? Will you all give me that?
00:10:14.260 Even if you don't like Trump. Even if you're not a Trump supporter, you'd have to give me that prediction.
00:10:19.460 That he does look better to the public. You know, maybe not you personally. But the public
00:10:24.500 absolutely has a better opinion of him. What does the black and Hispanic support for Republicans look like?
00:10:34.740 Really good. Yeah, it turns out that black and Hispanic support for Republicans in the midterm
00:10:39.940 might be the highest it's ever been. Highest it's ever been. All right. So how good is that? It's like amazing.
00:10:50.820 How about the fact that both the Democrats and the Republicans are bitching about elections being rigged?
00:10:58.100 Is that bad or good for the Republic? Go. Bad or good for the Republic? Then both sides, both sides say,
00:11:05.540 whoa, these elections might be rigged. You better watch them really carefully. So good. So, so good.
00:11:13.700 There's nothing that made me happier than waking up and seeing that everybody's talking about election reform.
00:11:18.100 Right? How long have I waited for that? Today's the best day ever. It's the one day the entire
00:11:25.380 fucking country can agree our elections are not where we deserve them to be. I don't use deserve often
00:11:32.980 because I don't like that word. But I feel like we deserve better, better transparency and better
00:11:42.100 certainty. Now, my opinion is I have no idea how good or bad elections are or have been in the past.
00:11:50.900 But I can tell you how I'm going to react to the outcome. I will accept it when it is called.
00:11:59.780 And I don't care how sketchy it looks. I'm going to accept the outcome as it's called.
00:12:06.260 Now, I suppose there could be some extreme and, you know, thing that would change my mind. But if it
00:12:11.140 looks like a normal election, even if people are bitching about this, you know, this precinct or
00:12:17.460 those missing ballots or those extra things or whatever, I'm going to accept it. Because here's what I've
00:12:23.700 accepted as my truth. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats want the system fixed in any serious way.
00:12:32.420 That's my opinion. So if neither team wants it fixed, then the, the, the potential rigging or
00:12:40.740 gaming of the system, even in legal means, is now part of our process. You know, we have essentially
00:12:47.940 de facto all agreed that as long as the cheating is below some line of obviousness, as long as both,
00:12:57.060 both sides have all the rules. They know what to do. They know where to cheat. They know how to get
00:13:01.860 caught. They're basically all playing the same game. If they're all playing the same game, then I hate
00:13:08.660 to say it, but you know how we judge a potential leader by how well they campaign? And yet the campaign
00:13:17.300 is not really a perfect proxy for how you would govern. Campaigning is sort of a different skill.
00:13:22.740 But we do that anyway, right? We make some judgments about the campaign. I, I believe that the, uh, the
00:13:31.300 quality of the two parties is being expressed partly in how they game the system. Would you want to support
00:13:38.500 a party that couldn't game the system if the other side is? Do you want your side to be the one who's not
00:13:44.980 trying to game the system? Probably not, right? You might, you might have some like moral ethical
00:13:53.540 line, but if you know the other side is, if you know the other side is going to take advantage of
00:13:58.900 every opening that they could take advantage of, you kind of want your team to do it too, right?
00:14:04.100 That's not irrational. So we are going into an election in which both sides are going to try to
00:14:10.100 game it every way they can. Some elements of both sides will cheat. Would you agree? Would you,
00:14:17.860 will you agree with me that both Republicans and Democrats at some level somewhere will be cheating?
00:14:26.020 There's nobody here who thinks it's only going to be Democrats cheating, right? Like everywhere,
00:14:31.540 every state, every precinct, it's only, it's only going to be the Democrats cheating. No,
00:14:36.100 you don't live in that country. Really? Really? You believe that? No, you don't. You don't believe
00:14:42.660 that. I'm not even sure the mostly part sticks, or at least I didn't believe it until today.
00:14:51.380 Do you want to have your mind just blown? Some of you already heard this news. It's more of a Twitter
00:14:57.540 thing. I'm going to tell you something that will sound like I don't know what I'm talking about,
00:15:06.580 partly because it's true, because I don't know enough about this topic yet, but also because
00:15:13.380 the topic is so unbelievable that I look right at it and I think, I don't know what I'm even seeing
00:15:20.900 or hearing. I don't even think that's possible. But it comes from good sources. For example,
00:15:27.940 Harmeet is actually the one of the sources, and I wasn't sure I believed it until I saw it from her
00:15:36.660 account. But did you know, and I hope I have this right, that there was a consent decree back in the
00:15:43.140 80s that banned the GOP from actively participating in elections, like the management or the effort of the
00:15:54.980 election? Did you know that? And the only reason that that got reversed, which was in the past year,
00:16:03.860 I guess, is that the judge who was keeping that live died. If the judge had not died,
00:16:11.540 it would still be the case. And so, apparently, the Republicans taking advantage of this change,
00:16:18.340 as Harmeet says. This election cycle has, GOP has recruited and trained over 80,000 poll watchers,
00:16:27.940 poll workers. She's a comma, poll worker, so I'm not sure what that sentence means. But
00:16:34.020 I think the 80,000 means they're poll workers, I guess. We've engaged over one million volunteers,
00:16:42.900 conducted 5,200 leadership trainings to prepare for election day operations, filed nearly 80 lawsuits, retained
00:16:49.780 dozens of litigators, trained hundreds more, etc. And here's the part that this will just make your mind
00:16:58.500 explode. Like, I don't even know how to hold this in my head. This is just so mind-bending that we're
00:17:05.860 finding this out today. She says, this effort started last year, once a long-running consent decree
00:17:12.900 dating back to early 80s, barring the GOP from engaging in election day efforts. Expired. Judge literally
00:17:22.900 expired. You know, he died. Next judge refused Dem effort to extend it. And then her firm is working
00:17:30.580 in multi-states on this. Is your head exploding? Like, I feel like I need a fact check on this,
00:17:39.140 even though Harmeet is highly, highly credible. Right? Like, I'm sure she's right, and I still can't
00:17:46.180 believe it. Right? This is one of those weird things where you can believe it and not believe
00:17:52.180 it at the same time. Like, I believe it. I believe it because the source is good. But I don't believe
00:17:59.220 it. Right? Are you having the same reaction? It's just not believable. But I think it's true.
00:18:06.660 It's the damnedest thing. It's really playing with my mind. But I don't know. I guess we'll find out
00:18:15.140 more about that. Here's why our system is stronger than ever. Another reason. There are more election
00:18:25.780 deniers than ever. That's just the best thing. I think I said that before. And you're seeing more
00:18:35.940 black, as I said, more black and Hispanic support for the GOP, I think is a sign of strength of the
00:18:42.020 system. What would be a weaker system than 98% of black people voting for the same party every
00:18:49.140 election? Could you imagine a stronger signal of a broken world? And that's just broken. But if you
00:18:59.060 get to, you know, I think we're only talking about 17%, but that's double what it was. So movement in the
00:19:05.460 right direction. Movement in the right direction. That's all good. All right. So that's the good
00:19:12.500 news. I think this system is strong. And I love today. Today is really a celebration of America.
00:19:19.540 With all of our bitching and complaining and all of our conspiracy theories, this is who we are.
00:19:27.620 Am I right? This is who we are. We complain about ourselves, meaning America. We will complain bitterly.
00:19:35.140 We'll fight like cats and dogs. But today, we all support the same system. We all support the same
00:19:42.980 system today. It's amazing. It's a cool day. All right. No matter how it goes. And I don't know how it's
00:19:50.100 going to go, frankly. All right. What do these things have in common? Fentanyl, TikTok, teachers' unions,
00:19:57.940 and abortions. What do they all have in common? Fentanyl, TikTok, teachers' unions, and abortions.
00:20:05.060 Two things they have in common. Number one, they are things which Democrats aren't doing anything
00:20:14.180 about or favor. And they're deadly for children and fetuses, if you want to make the distinction
00:20:23.140 between a child and a fetus. Not all of you do. And I respect that decision. But it's starting to be
00:20:34.020 kind of obvious that the Democrats are anti-child. Am I wrong? Like, it seems to be everywhere.
00:20:44.900 It's everywhere. Like, shut down the schools. Oh, that's good for the adults. Not really, but
00:20:52.180 yeah. Everything seems to have the same quality to it. Now, I would like to slam the Republicans as hard
00:21:01.940 as I possibly could for also being worthless on TikTok and Fentanyl. And what some people said is,
00:21:09.460 but Scott, Trump signed two executive orders trying to ban TikTok. So that's a real thing, right?
00:21:20.260 No. No, that's not a real thing. Now, the courts became a big core battle, and the courts overturned it,
00:21:28.020 right? Let me ask you this. Do I not understand what the commander-in-chief job is? Am I confused what
00:21:37.300 a commander-in-chief is supposed to do? Am I missing the whole concept? TikTok is not a potential threat.
00:21:45.860 It's a current active military threat against the children of America. It's an ongoing war.
00:21:57.380 They're being brain damaged and degraded by China right now, while we sit here. Now, if you tell me,
00:22:04.980 can I give you a little warning? There's a real good chance some cursing might come out in the next few
00:22:14.260 moments. If you don't want to hear anything, let's say not an appropriate word for social media,
00:22:21.140 you might want to check out now. This would be a good time, okay? Because I've never been a commander-in-chief.
00:22:31.540 Well, let me tell you how I would play it, and this is apparently not how Trump played it,
00:22:38.260 and it would go like this. I'm signing an executive order to ban TikTok in my role as commander-in-chief.
00:22:47.860 And then the court says, wait a minute, you can't do that. And then I say, fuck you. You're not the
00:22:55.060 commander-in-chief. And then the court says, but wait, you can't do that. And then I say,
00:23:01.620 I'm not sure you heard me the first time. But fuck you to death. You're not the commander-in-chief.
00:23:09.460 But just give us one week to see what the courts say. Maybe you didn't hear me the first time.
00:23:17.620 Fuck you. There's only one commander-in-chief. It's not you. Do you understand what the commander-in-chief
00:23:27.060 does? Do you understand the fucking job? It's to keep you safe. And the only requirement I have
00:23:34.740 in the real world, not in the legal world and not in the constitutional world, I'll give you that,
00:23:40.180 you know, commander-in-chief is not all-powerful. I'll give you that, right? But there is one case
00:23:46.500 where the commander-in-chief is all-powerful. It's when the entire fucking country agrees with him.
00:23:55.140 In that case, and in that case alone, fuck the Constitution, fuck the courts, fuck everybody.
00:24:03.700 The commander-in-chief is in charge. That's the way you want it. It's the way I want it. It's the
00:24:10.500 way Democrats want it. It's the way Republicans want it. It's the only way it works, right? Now,
00:24:16.980 if Trump had banned TikTok, and then two months later the court overturned it,
00:24:25.220 I would look into that as a little bit of a different situation. But you know what happened?
00:24:29.540 The court got the first vote. The court overruled the commander-in-chief on a military fucking issue.
00:24:40.260 On a fucking military issue. Now, am I giving Trump a pass because it seems like he did the right thing?
00:24:50.260 No. Failing, failing, failing. Fucking failing grade. That is no commander-in-chiefing.
00:24:56.660 The commander-in-chief leads. The commander-in-chief leads. You don't wait for the fucking court.
00:25:07.620 If the commander-in-chief, you know, does something crazy that the American public is not behind,
00:25:13.060 well, that's at their own risk, right? That's at their own risk.
00:25:17.060 But if the commander-in-chief does what the public, Democrats and Republicans, I'm pretty sure, by a huge majority are going to agree with,
00:25:28.100 the fucking court better stay out of it. And if you allow the court to overrule your commander-in-chief,
00:25:36.900 when you and everyone else agrees with the commander-in-chief, there's something wrong.
00:25:43.300 So, let me say as clearly as I can, I don't support any candidates that are running for office in the midterms.
00:25:51.120 I also don't support any potential presidential campaign that, you know, seems likely to run.
00:25:59.960 Do you know who I don't respect whatsoever for their fentanyl opinion?
00:26:04.940 Carrie Lake.
00:26:06.840 Chip Roy.
00:26:07.480 You know, anybody you want to name Trump, anybody you want to name who you think is a hard-ass on fentanyl,
00:26:13.460 not even fucking close.
00:26:15.240 They're not even in the zip code of being serious, right?
00:26:19.400 If they're trying to tell you that the border security, or even the death sentence for fentanyl dealers,
00:26:26.860 which Trump promotes, if they're trying to convince you that that's dealing with the problem,
00:26:32.280 they are fucking lying to you, or they're idiots, or they're idiots,
00:26:36.580 and I don't think they are.
00:26:38.220 None of the people I mentioned are idiots, clearly, right?
00:26:42.060 They're not, they're not idiots.
00:26:44.380 So, they're either wrong, or they're lying to you.
00:26:47.820 They either don't know what to do, or they're lying to you.
00:26:50.100 There, there looks like there's only one serious thing you could actually do about fentanyl.
00:26:54.360 Maybe two.
00:26:56.760 Yes, I'm in favor of the death sentence for the high-end fentanyl dealers,
00:27:01.480 but it's not going to make much difference.
00:27:03.040 Yes, I'm in favor of airtight border security in general.
00:27:09.300 You know, I think how much we, you know, turn the dial and who we let in is a separate question.
00:27:13.660 But absolutely, tighten that border.
00:27:15.920 That's just basic hygiene for your country.
00:27:19.080 But that's 5% of the problem, because fentanyl is so small,
00:27:22.660 you can, you just throw it over the fence.
00:27:25.120 I mean, literally.
00:27:26.120 You just say, hey, here's enough fentanyl to kill everybody in San Francisco.
00:27:30.100 Catch.
00:27:30.400 So, the wall isn't going to stop fentanyl, all right?
00:27:34.120 Now, if you're, if you've been fooled by the,
00:27:38.320 I did a lesson on the Locals platform yesterday about how to create psychological blindness.
00:27:45.040 The way you create psychological blindness is you make somebody look in the wrong place.
00:27:49.460 If they move their frame of perception,
00:27:52.600 they'll just miss something that they would ordinarily have noticed.
00:27:56.340 Here's what you would have ordinarily all known,
00:28:00.600 except that all of the politicians on the left and the right are causing you some blindness.
00:28:05.940 Here's what you should all know that you don't know.
00:28:08.580 Border security is almost none of the solution.
00:28:12.520 Might be 5%.
00:28:13.480 That's it.
00:28:14.820 If you've been fooled into thinking that those are solutions,
00:28:20.780 you've been cognitively blinded by people who are doing it intentionally, right?
00:28:25.860 Here's what a solution would look like.
00:28:28.840 I propose to level the cartels where they stand,
00:28:33.260 and to take functional control of the Mexican government
00:28:35.940 to make sure that the cartels, you know, aren't running the government,
00:28:39.700 and then we'll phase it back to Mexico
00:28:42.720 once we are comfortable that their country is in good shape.
00:28:47.200 I would say we're saving Mexico.
00:28:51.060 How many Mexican citizens do you think would actually disagree
00:28:54.700 with destroying their own government that is clearly owned by the cartels?
00:28:59.520 Probably none.
00:29:01.580 Probably fucking none.
00:29:03.940 Right?
00:29:04.080 This is one of those things where I can't describe to you enough
00:29:10.660 if you don't, you know, live among the immigrant community, as I do.
00:29:15.500 You don't understand their attitudes about anything.
00:29:20.080 There's nobody who came across the border,
00:29:22.940 and probably nobody who remained unless they work for the cartels,
00:29:25.740 who wants the cartel to be running their country.
00:29:29.460 Do you think there's anybody on any side
00:29:31.200 who wants the cartel in charge of Mexico?
00:29:32.900 No. No.
00:29:33.940 There's zero people on that side except, you know, the cartel.
00:29:38.080 So, and then let me ask you this.
00:29:41.480 How hard would it be to conquer the Mexican government?
00:29:46.680 It's probably a day job.
00:29:51.420 Right?
00:29:53.200 It's probably a day job.
00:29:54.760 Because I think they would just roll over, wouldn't they?
00:29:57.940 Probably.
00:29:58.380 I'm not even sure the soldiers would fight.
00:30:01.780 Because it's only the leaders who are, you know, in bed with the cartel.
00:30:05.640 It's not the rank and file.
00:30:07.440 So if America went and said,
00:30:09.100 we're going to change your leadership,
00:30:11.300 but everything else is fine.
00:30:13.220 We're not going to change anything.
00:30:14.100 We're just going to change out your leadership to get rid of the cartel.
00:30:17.700 You could actually probably get the military to go along with,
00:30:21.600 at least the rank and file.
00:30:22.480 Well, it's not like they have nukes, right?
00:30:26.660 Mexico doesn't have nukes.
00:30:29.320 Do they have missiles?
00:30:31.460 I don't believe Mexico has anything that could reach the United States with any real risk,
00:30:36.600 is it?
00:30:38.060 As if they would attack the United States.
00:30:40.200 I don't think they would.
00:30:40.940 Now, how much is your mind blown that I'm saying with no restrictions whatsoever,
00:30:47.960 I'm not hedging this whatsoever,
00:30:49.520 that the United States should attack and conquer Mexico,
00:30:53.700 but temporarily.
00:30:54.560 We should give it back after we fix it.
00:31:00.780 Does it blow your mind that I can say that directly and out loud?
00:31:07.180 It's kind of weird, isn't it?
00:31:08.380 Now, you're saying it's delusional.
00:31:10.840 You're saying it's delusional because the odds of it happening are very low.
00:31:15.060 Wouldn't you agree?
00:31:17.360 Do you see what I'm doing?
00:31:21.220 You see what I'm doing, though, right?
00:31:23.360 I'm actually changing the odds.
00:31:26.540 If the odds were going to stay where they are,
00:31:29.900 I'd say, yeah, that's not going to happen.
00:31:31.420 No point in even talking about it.
00:31:33.340 No, I'm changing the odds.
00:31:34.860 Because I just did it right here.
00:31:36.200 I just said, let's attack Mexico and conquer them and destroy the cartels,
00:31:41.220 and then give Mexico back when we're done.
00:31:44.180 And I didn't see anybody disagree with me.
00:31:48.420 Maybe I missed it.
00:31:50.220 But I saw people sort of talking about it,
00:31:53.520 but I didn't see anybody disagree.
00:31:58.180 That's persuasion.
00:31:59.180 See, the first part of persuasion is people have to accept it in the set of possible things.
00:32:06.400 And you just did that.
00:32:08.040 You just accepted it on the list of possible things.
00:32:11.640 And it wasn't there before.
00:32:13.480 I put it there.
00:32:14.980 Do you remember you heard the story that Trump had asked about attacking the cartels
00:32:19.240 with a drone or a missile or something?
00:32:21.560 And the first time you heard it, you're like, what?
00:32:24.500 What?
00:32:24.860 That's crazy.
00:32:25.900 That's crazy.
00:32:27.700 And then the second time you hear it, you're like, yeah, that's crazy.
00:32:31.400 And the third time you hear it, you're like, yeah, that's something people are talking about.
00:32:35.620 I hope we don't do that.
00:32:39.340 And the next time you hear it, you're like, huh, huh, I wonder if that's actually something that could happen.
00:32:44.740 Then the tenth time you hear it, it's an option.
00:32:48.240 The tenth time you hear it, it's just an option.
00:32:52.200 So I'm going to move attacking Mexico from something unthinkable to a fucking option.
00:33:00.700 If somebody has a better idea, totally open to that.
00:33:04.040 And by the way, at the same time, I would work on demand.
00:33:07.480 I'd work on demand at the same time, as hard as you can.
00:33:10.620 But it's not a one-solution situation.
00:33:13.000 It's a do-everything situation.
00:33:14.820 It's all hands on deck.
00:33:15.960 The other thing you could do is you could ask America to narc on the fentanyl dealers.
00:33:25.400 I just had that idea.
00:33:28.080 Here's what I wouldn't do.
00:33:30.140 I would never ask somebody to narc on an American.
00:33:35.120 I would never ask you to narc on an American for doing American crime.
00:33:41.160 Because, you know, it's not going to happen, and blah, blah, blah.
00:33:46.500 But fentanyl is not about American crime.
00:33:49.780 Anybody who's selling fentanyl is working for China, whether they like it or not.
00:33:54.620 They're either working for the cartel or they're working for China, or both.
00:33:59.720 Right?
00:33:59.980 So, would you drop a dime on a spy, a foreign spy?
00:34:06.240 If you knew somebody was working for China, against the interests of the United States, would you call the FBI?
00:34:11.840 I would.
00:34:12.600 That's not narcing.
00:34:13.880 Is that narcing?
00:34:15.560 That's not narcing at all.
00:34:17.220 Do you know who else should call the FBI?
00:34:20.160 Criminals.
00:34:20.640 Even a criminal should call the FBI.
00:34:24.480 Because, you know, even the mafia was on America's side during World War II.
00:34:30.160 Am I wrong?
00:34:31.640 Even the mafia is on America's side.
00:34:36.120 You know?
00:34:37.560 Right?
00:34:38.240 So, if you're the worst criminal in the world, you should still drop a dime on even a low-end fentanyl dealer.
00:34:46.260 Right?
00:34:47.880 Every name of every person.
00:34:49.560 Because there are people who know the names.
00:34:52.760 I'll bet every fentanyl dealer is known to somebody who doesn't do fentanyl.
00:34:57.480 I'll bet every one.
00:34:59.080 I'll bet every one.
00:35:01.720 There's somebody who could drop a dime on them.
00:35:05.840 And I don't think you should encourage dropping a dime on the heroin, the cocaine, the marijuana, whatever else.
00:35:14.940 Because that's just going to get you killed.
00:35:17.240 Right?
00:35:17.380 And I don't ask you to get killed to stop a crime.
00:35:22.040 I mean, that's, you know, that would be brave.
00:35:26.080 But I wouldn't encourage you to do it.
00:35:28.600 But I would encourage you to risk your life for the country.
00:35:34.580 For the country.
00:35:36.000 Fentanyl's an external threat.
00:35:37.480 I do ask you to risk your life for the country.
00:35:41.840 So, drop a dime on a fentanyl dealer.
00:35:45.580 And they should all be taken off the streets.
00:35:48.300 And if you have a better idea...
00:35:51.180 Now, at the same time, I would make alternatives legal.
00:35:55.040 If you listen to somebody who's actually an addict, they will tell you that they would immediately leave fentanyl if they had something that was, like, similar and safer and all that.
00:36:09.180 But they don't really have...
00:36:10.440 It's not easy to have that option and affordable and accessible and everything.
00:36:14.200 But I suppose you could do it.
00:36:16.760 I don't know.
00:36:16.980 It'd be worth trying.
00:36:17.980 I don't know how well it would work.
00:36:21.660 Gather the drug users into a tent city and destroy the market.
00:36:27.360 Yeah, I don't...
00:36:28.160 There are too many of them.
00:36:29.100 The trouble is that the fentanyl dealers you don't know who...
00:36:31.520 Or the fentanyl users, you don't know who they are.
00:36:33.380 Somebody says, I'm sorry, but you don't know much about this topic.
00:36:41.840 There's somebody here who says, I don't know much about the fentanyl topic.
00:36:50.660 Okay.
00:36:57.480 I'm not even sure if that comment was directed at me.
00:37:01.120 Because it's so...
00:37:02.200 That's so far off.
00:37:03.380 I don't think there's much I know more about.
00:37:07.360 There's not much I know more about.
00:37:09.980 And you realize I'm, like, right on the edge of unloading on you right now, right?
00:37:13.900 You realize how close I am to just going...
00:37:18.420 All right.
00:37:21.140 Two sniffs and an exhale.
00:37:27.840 Serenity now.
00:37:29.240 Serenity now.
00:37:30.320 All right.
00:37:33.380 Let's see what else is going on here.
00:37:37.420 And again, I saw somebody on Twitter saying that the war on drugs hasn't worked before,
00:37:46.120 so why would the war on drugs work with fentanyl?
00:37:49.080 What do you think of that?
00:37:50.020 The war on drugs has never worked yet.
00:37:53.400 Why would a war on drugs work against fentanyl?
00:37:57.200 I'll tell you why.
00:37:58.220 Because which other drug could be solved by attacking Mexico, or that was, like, a reasonable thing to say.
00:38:07.620 Fentanyl is a weapon of mass destruction.
00:38:14.360 We do do wars against weapons of mass destruction, unfortunately, even when they're not there.
00:38:20.340 Iraq being an example.
00:38:21.520 Don't compare the war on drugs to the war on fentanyl.
00:38:27.300 Fentanyl is a drug if you take it by prescription.
00:38:30.840 Would you all agree?
00:38:32.420 In the context of prescription and the actual health care system, fentanyl is a drug.
00:38:37.400 And it's a very good one, I hear.
00:38:39.040 Very good one.
00:38:39.880 And it's one you'd want to keep around.
00:38:41.160 But as soon as it's outside the domain of health care, it's just a weapon of mass destruction.
00:38:47.320 And it should be treated that way.
00:38:50.720 So the worst thing we could do for the so-called war on drugs wasn't very much.
00:38:57.800 But the worst thing you could do to fight a weapon of mass destruction is no limits.
00:39:03.120 That's a no-limit war.
00:39:05.020 The war against drugs is a very limited war.
00:39:07.460 You just do what you can get away with and what makes sense.
00:39:10.300 But the war against fentanyl?
00:39:12.300 No, you just take all the controls off.
00:39:14.760 And I'm talking about murdering the Chinese fentanyl dealers in their beds in China.
00:39:20.280 That's what I mean by take all the controls off.
00:39:24.280 You just kill them in their beds.
00:39:26.080 And kill as many as you need to.
00:39:27.940 And just kill them all day long.
00:39:29.620 And then China will say, wait, if you're murdering people in our country,
00:39:33.480 we might try murdering people in your country.
00:39:35.800 And then you say to China, well, big fucking duh, you just killed 100,000 of us already,
00:39:43.640 and TikTok's trying to finish us off.
00:39:45.640 So yes, we're going to kill as many fucking Chinese people in their beds as we need to
00:39:50.920 to stop fentanyl.
00:39:52.840 And I would kill anybody who was doing TikTok if we can't make them stop that.
00:39:56.600 But I think we can stop that in an easier way.
00:39:59.060 We don't have to kill anybody who stopped TikTok.
00:40:04.040 But I would murder them in their beds, and I would never stop.
00:40:07.580 Now, I don't know if we can, but we must have some assets in China.
00:40:12.140 We must have something.
00:40:14.700 I don't know, somebody we could pay to do it.
00:40:16.380 I don't know.
00:40:19.420 There's a Carrie Lake ad.
00:40:21.300 I was asked to rate for Persuasion.
00:40:23.660 And if you haven't seen it, she's talking about her experience as a media person
00:40:29.740 and how the media is gaslighting you,
00:40:32.020 and she's using a sledgehammer to break some televisions and stuff.
00:40:36.980 And I'm not even going to bother rating it, because it's perfect.
00:40:43.280 There's almost nothing to say about it.
00:40:44.780 It's just perfect.
00:40:45.300 And so I created a little scale of Persuasion Power,
00:40:50.980 just so you can see where everybody stands.
00:40:53.840 And here's where I put them.
00:40:57.220 I put, on a scale of 1 to Carrie Lake.
00:40:59.660 So Carrie Lake's a 10.
00:41:01.100 There's nobody operating at her level right now.
00:41:05.280 Let me say that just unambiguously.
00:41:08.160 There's nobody else at her level right now.
00:41:10.540 Nobody.
00:41:11.860 It's not like there's somebody at a close second.
00:41:16.080 You know, Trump is second.
00:41:18.120 But honestly, it's not close.
00:41:20.780 It's like another level.
00:41:23.280 So I put her at 10, but I put Trump at a 9.
00:41:26.460 I put Trump at a 9.
00:41:27.900 I put DeSantis and Gavin Newsom at 8.
00:41:33.220 Because they appear to be doing good jobs for their base.
00:41:37.520 So somebody asked me about DeSantis' Persuasion abilities,
00:41:41.980 which are high, but not because he has Persuasion skill.
00:41:47.180 What DeSantis has is competence.
00:41:51.260 And he reads his base really well.
00:41:53.840 Now, those are really good things for a politician.
00:41:56.800 What's better than competence?
00:41:58.760 What's better than knowing what your base wants
00:42:00.580 and immediately responding to it?
00:42:02.760 Those are really persuasive things.
00:42:04.480 But they're not classically, linguistically persuasive.
00:42:10.160 I don't see DeSantis having the Trump skill or the Carrie Lake skill.
00:42:15.720 But certainly completely capable.
00:42:18.400 If you get a president who can do 8 on Persuasion,
00:42:22.460 you know, that's your George Bush's, your Bill Clinton's.
00:42:27.380 You know, that's strong.
00:42:28.760 You would be well served by an 8.
00:42:30.540 But we do have a 10, and it's just worth noting.
00:42:35.100 The things she got right are, like, everything.
00:42:40.440 She used fear persuasion.
00:42:42.180 She used visual persuasion.
00:42:44.160 She used pacing and leading.
00:42:46.080 She probably made you think past the sale.
00:42:49.700 I don't know.
00:42:50.540 It was everything.
00:42:51.740 Basically, just everything.
00:42:53.060 It was all there.
00:42:53.560 And the other thing she has going for, which I think matters,
00:43:00.360 but I don't see other people talking about it,
00:43:03.100 is that, what's the right word?
00:43:08.600 Oh, I just lost the word.
00:43:10.200 Her gender is, how do I say this without being insulting?
00:43:16.860 She has both masculine and feminine traits.
00:43:21.900 And the weird thing is, she has lots of both.
00:43:27.200 Androgynous, maybe, but that feels like insulting.
00:43:31.220 All right.
00:43:31.980 Let me give you an example.
00:43:35.200 When Mick Jagger is performing on stage,
00:43:41.940 let's say the younger version of Mick Jagger,
00:43:44.060 he was weirdly masculine and feminine
00:43:51.140 at the same time, wasn't he?
00:43:53.600 And it really worked.
00:43:55.760 Didn't it?
00:43:57.220 Like, there wasn't anybody like him, per se.
00:44:00.500 I mean, Bowie, maybe the same thing,
00:44:02.180 but, you know, wouldn't you say that
00:44:04.240 Mick Jagger was both masculine and feminine
00:44:07.060 at the same time,
00:44:08.160 but also projected both of them with maximum strength,
00:44:11.560 which is weird.
00:44:12.780 Very rare.
00:44:13.400 And I think Carrie Lake does that.
00:44:17.260 That she is weirdly sexy
00:44:20.080 while representing the better qualities
00:44:24.640 of two different genders.
00:44:26.880 So that's how I turned that into a compliment.
00:44:30.040 She has the better qualities of two genders.
00:44:34.080 Right?
00:44:34.780 Now, I realize how sexist that sounds.
00:44:37.780 Right?
00:44:37.940 So I'm dealing here on a,
00:44:39.440 let's say, on a stereotype level,
00:44:43.520 just so you know,
00:44:44.240 I'm aware of what I'm doing here.
00:44:46.080 On a stereotypical level,
00:44:48.400 she has femininity,
00:44:49.780 because she's, you know,
00:44:50.500 she's got the look.
00:44:52.580 And she, you know,
00:44:53.580 cares about the children and stuff,
00:44:55.140 so she's got the nurturing thing.
00:44:57.160 But she's tough as nails,
00:44:59.200 and she's using a, you know,
00:45:00.220 sledgehammer for her ad.
00:45:01.760 So, you know,
00:45:04.580 you sort of imagine that as more of a male energy.
00:45:08.440 Yeah, that's really strong.
00:45:09.640 She, basically, she just hits every note.
00:45:12.020 Every note.
00:45:14.660 So, but again,
00:45:17.400 I do not,
00:45:18.120 I do not recommend her for office,
00:45:21.040 because there's nobody running
00:45:23.400 who's got fentanyl right.
00:45:25.640 And I'm just a single,
00:45:26.860 single issue voter,
00:45:28.860 which means I won't be voting,
00:45:30.580 because there's nobody who's good on fentanyl.
00:45:33.020 All right.
00:45:34.420 Twitter growth is at an all-time high under Musk,
00:45:37.520 which I think explains why my user numbers are up.
00:45:42.060 Does anybody still have high user numbers?
00:45:45.040 You're still getting a lot of new followers?
00:45:48.120 Let me check mine here.
00:45:51.460 I'll give you the,
00:45:52.480 I'll actually show it to you.
00:45:55.140 Pre and post Musk.
00:45:57.080 So the Social Blade app
00:45:58.380 shows you how many people are signing up.
00:46:02.320 So I'll show you,
00:46:03.740 all right,
00:46:04.100 so here you can see it.
00:46:06.720 Probably you can't see it very well.
00:46:08.820 But you can see in the top is pre,
00:46:11.200 pre Musk,
00:46:13.300 and then it goes into post Musk.
00:46:16.300 You can see there's a huge jump.
00:46:19.240 So it goes from an average of maybe,
00:46:21.240 I don't know,
00:46:21.720 just eyeballing it,
00:46:22.780 maybe 200 per day,
00:46:24.800 a little more per average as new followers.
00:46:27.420 And now it's closer to,
00:46:29.320 you know,
00:46:30.040 1,000 per day.
00:46:31.500 But it's trending down,
00:46:33.160 so I think it'll go back to some baseline.
00:46:34.960 So I would say that the change
00:46:37.400 almost certainly is
00:46:39.180 Musk excitement level change.
00:46:44.300 And
00:46:45.020 probably not because of some algorithm change.
00:46:51.880 All right.
00:46:53.780 I was pointing to an article
00:46:55.580 in which
00:46:56.460 some climate activist
00:46:59.320 was wondering,
00:46:59.960 why is it
00:47:01.440 why is it
00:47:02.800 that the whole population
00:47:04.180 doesn't understand
00:47:05.260 that we're heading toward
00:47:07.100 destroying the planet
00:47:08.060 with,
00:47:08.920 you know,
00:47:09.280 climate change problems.
00:47:11.520 And
00:47:12.080 it was a pretty smart
00:47:13.440 piece.
00:47:15.620 But
00:47:16.180 what was missing
00:47:17.580 was something
00:47:19.900 that's always missing
00:47:20.820 from the climate change
00:47:22.180 argument.
00:47:23.860 And
00:47:24.420 have you noticed it?
00:47:26.700 What's the big thing
00:47:27.840 that they always forget?
00:47:29.980 Now,
00:47:30.360 they always forget,
00:47:31.240 you know,
00:47:31.560 the odds of technological improvements,
00:47:34.080 you know,
00:47:34.240 step changes
00:47:35.000 and what we can and cannot do.
00:47:37.080 But that's,
00:47:37.700 you know,
00:47:37.960 everybody ignores that
00:47:38.940 because it's basically
00:47:39.900 impossible to predict.
00:47:42.760 There's one other big thing.
00:47:44.120 They always leave out the military.
00:47:47.520 So here's
00:47:48.320 where I think
00:47:49.440 an education
00:47:50.480 would get people
00:47:51.280 on the same side.
00:47:53.200 Haven't you been
00:47:54.120 like puzzled
00:47:55.680 why the left
00:47:57.220 could think
00:47:57.740 that climate change
00:47:58.900 should be the priority
00:48:00.380 when you know
00:48:01.000 it would degrade
00:48:01.680 your economy
00:48:02.600 and you know
00:48:03.960 that degrading the economy
00:48:05.140 degrades your ability
00:48:06.920 to defend yourself.
00:48:08.760 That those are connected.
00:48:11.020 Right?
00:48:11.280 And I think Republicans
00:48:12.360 just sort of instinctively
00:48:14.820 see those things
00:48:15.640 as connected.
00:48:16.760 Don't they?
00:48:17.980 Don't you see
00:48:18.580 the economy
00:48:19.280 as being
00:48:20.160 your national defense?
00:48:23.140 Because it is.
00:48:24.740 Without an economy,
00:48:25.780 you can't bribe
00:48:26.640 other countries.
00:48:27.940 You can't,
00:48:28.580 you know,
00:48:29.060 get them on your side.
00:48:30.340 You can't make them
00:48:30.940 want to be your friend.
00:48:32.360 You can't buy weapons.
00:48:33.760 You can't last a long war.
00:48:36.020 You can't do anything.
00:48:37.580 Right?
00:48:37.940 So the economy
00:48:38.900 is your defense.
00:48:41.660 Right?
00:48:41.840 The only times
00:48:43.540 that's not the case
00:48:44.800 are special cases
00:48:46.220 like Costa Rica.
00:48:48.420 Costa Rica
00:48:49.160 has no military
00:48:50.100 because they're
00:48:52.260 our little buddy.
00:48:53.640 Right?
00:48:53.960 If you want to be
00:48:55.260 America's little buddy,
00:48:57.380 maybe you don't need
00:48:58.420 a military either.
00:48:59.740 Japan doesn't need
00:49:00.840 a full-sized military
00:49:02.600 because they're
00:49:03.060 our little buddy.
00:49:04.680 Right?
00:49:05.840 So,
00:49:06.640 when I see an article
00:49:08.120 that says,
00:49:08.840 why don't,
00:49:09.460 why doesn't the public
00:49:10.400 understand
00:49:11.140 that climate change
00:49:12.900 is, you know,
00:49:13.580 so dangerous to us?
00:49:15.120 I say,
00:49:16.160 where in your article
00:49:17.020 did you mention
00:49:17.860 that you can't have
00:49:19.920 a wind-powered military?
00:49:21.720 Like,
00:49:23.840 the pro-climate change,
00:49:26.580 you know,
00:49:27.640 aggressive change people
00:49:28.900 always leave out
00:49:30.640 the military,
00:49:31.520 don't they?
00:49:32.580 Show me any article
00:49:33.720 where a climate change
00:49:35.920 activist
00:49:36.600 has at least
00:49:37.920 even mentioned
00:49:38.840 that there would be
00:49:40.480 an impact
00:49:40.980 on national defense.
00:49:42.500 Even mentioning it.
00:49:43.820 Even somebody saying,
00:49:44.960 well,
00:49:45.100 here's all the pros,
00:49:46.620 here's all the cons,
00:49:48.460 but on balance,
00:49:49.560 I think we should go for,
00:49:50.720 you know,
00:49:51.240 electric and wind power
00:49:52.300 as hard as possible
00:49:53.160 and get rid of those
00:49:54.500 fossil fuels.
00:49:55.360 Have you ever seen that?
00:49:57.440 Right?
00:49:57.840 It's just missing.
00:50:00.160 It's just missing.
00:50:04.380 Am I having a microphone problem?
00:50:06.500 Some people are saying.
00:50:10.440 All right.
00:50:11.720 So,
00:50:12.320 you can't take
00:50:13.580 a climate person
00:50:14.980 seriously
00:50:15.820 unless they can say,
00:50:17.780 this will probably
00:50:19.960 hurt the military,
00:50:21.220 but I think
00:50:22.140 it's better to do anyway.
00:50:24.480 Now that,
00:50:25.140 I could respect
00:50:25.860 that opinion
00:50:26.420 even while
00:50:27.040 disagreeing with it.
00:50:28.380 Am I right?
00:50:29.300 That would be
00:50:30.060 an opinion
00:50:30.480 that you could say,
00:50:31.180 I disagree with that
00:50:32.200 heavily,
00:50:32.860 but I respect,
00:50:34.380 I respect
00:50:35.600 that you've shown
00:50:36.440 all of the elements.
00:50:38.300 You didn't leave out
00:50:39.220 something just to fool me.
00:50:40.920 You mentioned everything.
00:50:42.360 And now I can agree
00:50:44.260 or disagree,
00:50:44.900 but you're not an asshole.
00:50:46.620 Am I right?
00:50:48.000 If they can at least
00:50:48.740 mention all the things
00:50:50.000 that matter,
00:50:51.260 well,
00:50:51.580 at least I can have
00:50:52.180 a conversation with you.
00:50:53.840 But don't leave out
00:50:55.120 the military.
00:50:57.240 It's like,
00:50:57.960 it's like,
00:50:58.540 I want to live
00:51:00.180 under the ocean.
00:51:01.820 What are you going
00:51:02.420 to do for oxygen?
00:51:04.340 What?
00:51:05.560 No oxygen.
00:51:06.640 You said you want
00:51:07.220 to live permanently
00:51:08.040 under the ocean.
00:51:09.400 What are you going
00:51:10.100 to do for oxygen?
00:51:10.740 What?
00:51:13.740 It's like acting
00:51:14.840 like the biggest thing
00:51:15.660 doesn't matter.
00:51:17.320 It's crazy.
00:51:19.000 It's crazy.
00:51:21.440 All right.
00:51:26.160 Howard Stern
00:51:27.320 tweeted today
00:51:28.420 that preserving democracy
00:51:30.960 is, quote,
00:51:32.340 the only effing issue
00:51:33.700 on the table
00:51:34.440 in the midterms.
00:51:39.560 I started
00:51:40.620 to do a tweet thread
00:51:41.840 on all the ways
00:51:43.780 that's dumb.
00:51:45.440 And I thought,
00:51:46.460 I don't have the energy
00:51:47.380 to do that.
00:51:48.880 I don't think
00:51:49.640 I'd ever run
00:51:50.260 on the ways
00:51:50.740 that's dumb.
00:51:53.780 I don't even know
00:51:54.680 how to deal
00:51:56.520 with that comment.
00:51:57.620 Do you?
00:51:58.860 Now,
00:51:59.880 first of all,
00:52:01.500 would you agree
00:52:02.300 that he has
00:52:02.980 high intelligence?
00:52:05.140 He does, right?
00:52:06.640 Even if you disagree,
00:52:07.420 well,
00:52:07.860 if you disagree
00:52:09.840 with him politically
00:52:10.640 or whatever,
00:52:11.620 that's one thing.
00:52:12.220 But there's no way
00:52:13.260 he got to the level
00:52:15.140 he did
00:52:15.680 being dumb.
00:52:17.680 All right,
00:52:17.780 that didn't happen.
00:52:19.260 He's clearly
00:52:19.900 a smart guy.
00:52:21.580 Above average.
00:52:23.060 Above average,
00:52:23.900 in my opinion.
00:52:25.500 All right.
00:52:25.660 So,
00:52:26.780 why would somebody
00:52:27.580 that smart,
00:52:28.820 he's at least smart enough
00:52:30.060 for the point
00:52:30.760 I'm going to make,
00:52:31.720 right?
00:52:32.900 Why would somebody
00:52:33.580 that smart
00:52:34.180 say that preserving
00:52:36.000 democracy
00:52:36.560 is the only effing
00:52:37.620 issue on the table?
00:52:38.920 And what does
00:52:40.060 everybody being
00:52:40.800 really excited
00:52:41.460 about voting
00:52:42.200 have to do
00:52:44.220 with hurting democracy?
00:52:47.080 Did he actually
00:52:47.900 believe the January 6th
00:52:49.240 story and the TDS
00:52:50.380 and everything else?
00:52:52.040 You know,
00:52:52.300 one of the things
00:52:53.060 I've noticed
00:52:53.660 is that
00:52:55.160 the people
00:52:56.040 who have a personal
00:52:57.000 problem with Trump
00:52:57.980 just can't get over it.
00:53:00.100 Just can't get over it.
00:53:02.000 Right?
00:53:02.540 And correct me
00:53:03.200 if I'm wrong,
00:53:03.740 but I feel like
00:53:04.620 Howard Stern
00:53:05.740 and maybe Bill Maher
00:53:06.840 have had, like,
00:53:08.360 personal issues
00:53:09.200 with Trump
00:53:09.680 a little bit.
00:53:11.720 Yeah,
00:53:12.040 it feels just personal.
00:53:13.420 Like,
00:53:13.780 yeah,
00:53:14.380 they just feel broken.
00:53:19.240 But
00:53:19.720 apparently there's
00:53:21.780 no limit
00:53:22.480 to what
00:53:23.420 people will believe.
00:53:26.000 And
00:53:26.520 I think
00:53:28.060 the point
00:53:29.460 at which
00:53:30.040 you knew
00:53:30.620 there were
00:53:31.660 no limits
00:53:32.420 to what people
00:53:33.080 would believe,
00:53:33.740 no matter how
00:53:34.460 ridiculous,
00:53:35.720 was there one point
00:53:36.780 in our recent past
00:53:38.220 where you said,
00:53:38.720 okay,
00:53:39.040 that proves
00:53:40.760 absolutely
00:53:41.640 anything
00:53:42.820 will be believed.
00:53:44.340 It was the
00:53:45.240 drinking bleach hoax.
00:53:47.440 Now,
00:53:47.880 I would say
00:53:48.640 I would say
00:53:49.500 the Charlottesville
00:53:51.560 fine people
00:53:52.200 hoax,
00:53:52.840 but the reason
00:53:53.680 I'm not using
00:53:54.280 that one
00:53:54.740 is that
00:53:55.620 even though
00:53:56.220 it was a hoax
00:53:57.500 what he said,
00:53:59.120 it is still true
00:54:00.060 he should have
00:54:00.620 handled it differently.
00:54:02.900 I accept that
00:54:04.100 as true.
00:54:04.680 If he'd handled it
00:54:05.740 better,
00:54:06.640 he could have
00:54:07.140 solved his own
00:54:08.000 problem.
00:54:08.540 So I think
00:54:09.220 there's some room
00:54:09.840 for some criticism
00:54:10.760 on Trump
00:54:11.400 about the
00:54:12.460 fine people
00:54:12.960 hoax,
00:54:13.420 but not because
00:54:14.140 of what he said,
00:54:15.580 because he didn't
00:54:16.120 say what they
00:54:16.580 believe he said.
00:54:19.140 But the
00:54:19.860 drinking bleach
00:54:20.880 thing,
00:54:22.080 I'm pretty sure
00:54:22.860 he said the
00:54:23.400 right thing.
00:54:24.700 He started
00:54:25.880 by saying
00:54:26.620 he was talking
00:54:27.460 about light
00:54:28.120 as a disinfectant,
00:54:30.000 then he talked
00:54:30.700 about it,
00:54:31.640 and then he ended
00:54:32.440 by saying,
00:54:33.080 you know,
00:54:33.340 light as a
00:54:34.020 disinfectant,
00:54:34.820 at the same time
00:54:35.580 that light was
00:54:36.220 being used
00:54:36.680 as a disinfectant.
00:54:38.700 Now,
00:54:39.240 when I sign
00:54:40.540 off from
00:54:41.020 YouTube,
00:54:42.840 I'm going
00:54:43.540 to lock
00:54:44.060 the locals
00:54:45.300 feed here,
00:54:46.120 so I'm
00:54:47.920 going to
00:54:48.220 lock you
00:54:48.800 out of
00:54:49.020 the locals
00:54:49.400 feed.
00:54:49.700 I'm going
00:54:49.880 to tell
00:54:50.080 the people
00:54:50.840 on locals
00:54:51.420 something
00:54:52.360 behind the
00:54:53.240 curtain
00:54:53.580 that I
00:54:54.740 don't think
00:54:55.300 they necessarily
00:54:56.140 know.
00:54:56.660 Not all of them,
00:54:57.200 some of them
00:54:57.580 might not.
00:54:58.680 I'm going
00:54:59.220 to give them
00:54:59.620 a little bit
00:55:00.080 of a behind
00:55:02.560 the curtain
00:55:03.040 thing.
00:55:04.060 And yes,
00:55:04.520 I think most
00:55:04.940 of you know
00:55:05.300 that there
00:55:05.600 was an
00:55:05.860 actual study
00:55:06.780 about using
00:55:08.060 light,
00:55:08.540 the heal
00:55:09.000 light technology,
00:55:10.240 I think it
00:55:10.540 was called,
00:55:11.700 but I'll add
00:55:12.480 something for
00:55:13.100 the locals
00:55:13.940 crowd in a
00:55:14.840 minute.
00:55:14.960 All right.
00:55:18.260 Did I
00:55:19.100 cover everything?
00:55:20.580 I think I
00:55:21.200 did.
00:55:22.540 Wow.
00:55:24.400 What an
00:55:25.180 amazing,
00:55:25.720 amazing live
00:55:26.820 stream.
00:55:27.380 That's probably
00:55:27.800 what you're
00:55:28.180 thinking,
00:55:28.560 right?
00:55:28.840 You're
00:55:29.040 thinking,
00:55:29.300 I've never
00:55:30.320 seen a
00:55:30.700 live stream
00:55:31.080 this good.
00:55:31.960 Let's talk
00:55:32.460 about
00:55:32.800 Musk tweeted
00:55:36.360 that he's
00:55:38.340 promoting people
00:55:39.060 voting for
00:55:39.960 Republican in
00:55:40.820 the midterms
00:55:41.420 because he
00:55:42.280 thinks we
00:55:43.280 operate better,
00:55:44.380 meaning America
00:55:44.980 operates better
00:55:45.600 with a split
00:55:46.220 government.
00:55:47.440 So that would
00:55:47.800 give you
00:55:48.360 a Democrat
00:55:49.840 president,
00:55:50.800 and if
00:55:51.220 everybody got
00:55:52.880 elected in
00:55:53.420 Congress on
00:55:55.140 the Republican
00:55:55.580 side, it
00:55:56.120 would be a
00:55:56.480 Republican
00:55:56.840 Congress.
00:55:58.840 In my
00:55:59.680 opinion,
00:56:01.040 that was
00:56:02.320 inappropriate.
00:56:04.340 But free
00:56:05.180 speech, it's
00:56:05.860 legal.
00:56:06.780 It's legal.
00:56:07.340 In my
00:56:09.260 opinion, it
00:56:09.840 was inappropriate
00:56:10.760 for Elon
00:56:11.900 Musk to
00:56:12.820 take a
00:56:13.920 voting position
00:56:14.740 as head
00:56:16.560 of Twitter
00:56:17.660 a week
00:56:18.360 before the
00:56:18.840 election.
00:56:20.720 But he's
00:56:22.220 not wrong.
00:56:23.420 I don't
00:56:23.860 disagree with
00:56:24.420 the point.
00:56:25.880 I just
00:56:26.400 don't think
00:56:27.100 it was
00:56:28.020 the right
00:56:29.220 move because
00:56:30.540 it's going
00:56:32.340 to excite
00:56:33.980 people in a
00:56:34.720 way that they
00:56:35.300 don't need to
00:56:35.760 get excited.
00:56:36.340 You don't
00:56:37.640 want people
00:56:38.100 going to
00:56:38.480 the polls
00:56:38.900 thinking that
00:56:39.700 Elon Musk
00:56:40.460 influenced the
00:56:42.960 vote.
00:56:43.840 You don't
00:56:44.480 want the
00:56:44.840 guy who
00:56:45.380 owns Twitter
00:56:46.140 to be
00:56:47.120 influencing
00:56:47.640 votes at
00:56:48.760 all.
00:56:49.640 At all.
00:56:51.220 Right?
00:56:51.500 At all.
00:56:52.180 Not inside
00:56:53.040 the job,
00:56:53.660 not outside
00:56:54.140 the job,
00:56:55.040 not in his
00:56:55.620 private capacity.
00:56:57.260 But he
00:56:57.940 can.
00:56:59.160 But he
00:56:59.560 can.
00:57:00.380 So
00:57:00.600 unambiguously,
00:57:01.660 he has that
00:57:02.140 right as an
00:57:03.000 American.
00:57:03.880 And I 100%
00:57:04.980 support his
00:57:06.200 free speech
00:57:06.820 as an
00:57:07.200 American.
00:57:08.160 So he
00:57:08.420 has every
00:57:08.980 right.
00:57:09.520 So he's
00:57:09.940 right in
00:57:10.380 his point.
00:57:12.140 I agree
00:57:12.600 with the
00:57:12.880 point that
00:57:13.800 we do
00:57:14.160 like a
00:57:14.680 mixed
00:57:14.920 government.
00:57:16.480 And he
00:57:16.940 has the
00:57:17.140 right to
00:57:17.420 say it.
00:57:18.280 I just
00:57:18.820 wouldn't
00:57:19.060 have done
00:57:19.340 it.
00:57:20.720 What do
00:57:21.200 you think?
00:57:23.320 Do you
00:57:23.800 agree?
00:57:24.240 Do you
00:57:24.540 agree or
00:57:24.940 disagree?
00:57:25.400 I wouldn't
00:57:25.720 have done
00:57:26.000 it.
00:57:26.700 I think I
00:57:27.360 would have
00:57:27.560 stayed out
00:57:27.960 of it.
00:57:29.160 Yeah,
00:57:29.400 I don't
00:57:29.580 think it
00:57:30.460 helped him
00:57:31.140 or
00:57:31.480 America.
00:57:32.300 Would you
00:57:32.600 agree?
00:57:33.600 That it
00:57:33.960 didn't help
00:57:34.460 him,
00:57:34.840 it didn't
00:57:35.120 help
00:57:35.320 Twitter,
00:57:36.380 it didn't
00:57:36.660 help me.
00:57:38.040 I don't
00:57:38.520 think it
00:57:38.720 helped
00:57:38.860 anybody.
00:57:40.720 Yeah.
00:57:41.340 But at
00:57:41.820 the same
00:57:42.180 time,
00:57:42.820 would you
00:57:43.360 want Elon
00:57:44.000 Musk to
00:57:44.560 not be
00:57:45.020 Elon Musk?
00:57:47.080 Right?
00:57:47.940 Do you
00:57:48.440 want him
00:57:48.760 not to
00:57:49.140 do that?
00:57:50.480 It's
00:57:50.940 really a
00:57:51.320 tough one.
00:57:52.140 Because I
00:57:52.740 could say
00:57:53.120 I wouldn't
00:57:53.660 have done
00:57:54.020 it,
00:57:55.140 and I
00:57:55.760 could say
00:57:56.120 I prefer
00:57:56.660 he didn't
00:57:57.100 do it.
00:57:58.200 But I
00:57:58.580 would not
00:57:59.360 want any
00:57:59.940 pressure
00:58:00.440 on him
00:58:02.140 to not
00:58:02.560 say exactly
00:58:03.180 what he's
00:58:03.560 thinking,
00:58:03.920 whatever he's
00:58:04.380 thinking.
00:58:05.120 Because his
00:58:05.780 transparency is
00:58:06.660 like a
00:58:06.960 national gift,
00:58:08.420 in my
00:58:08.780 opinion.
00:58:09.780 It's just
00:58:10.320 a gift.
00:58:11.320 To be
00:58:11.620 able to
00:58:11.920 see what
00:58:13.460 appears to
00:58:13.980 be a
00:58:14.320 complete,
00:58:14.900 honest,
00:58:15.380 and transparent
00:58:16.080 approach to
00:58:17.340 all of this
00:58:17.740 stuff,
00:58:18.020 you don't
00:58:18.280 see that.
00:58:19.680 I want to
00:58:20.360 see the
00:58:20.620 real thing.
00:58:21.120 It's the
00:58:21.380 same thing
00:58:21.720 I say
00:58:22.000 about Trump.
00:58:23.300 Trump
00:58:23.620 says things
00:58:24.200 that I
00:58:24.520 wish he
00:58:24.840 hadn't
00:58:25.080 said.
00:58:26.220 We all
00:58:26.960 probably
00:58:27.260 think that.
00:58:28.360 But when
00:58:28.800 he does,
00:58:29.240 I have
00:58:29.460 these two
00:58:29.860 feelings
00:58:30.260 that's
00:58:30.480 like,
00:58:30.760 ah,
00:58:31.600 I wouldn't
00:58:32.280 have said
00:58:32.560 that.
00:58:33.640 And at
00:58:33.920 the same
00:58:34.220 time,
00:58:34.620 I think,
00:58:35.220 I'm really
00:58:36.460 glad he
00:58:36.960 did.
00:58:38.040 Because I
00:58:38.660 know what
00:58:38.880 he's
00:58:39.020 thinking.
00:58:40.380 Right?
00:58:41.460 Don't you
00:58:42.100 appreciate the
00:58:42.880 transparency even
00:58:43.820 if it bothers
00:58:44.340 you?
00:58:45.100 Like,
00:58:45.420 I'll take the
00:58:45.880 transparency every
00:58:46.700 time.
00:58:47.780 I just
00:58:48.140 wouldn't have
00:58:48.460 done.
00:58:52.220 Michael
00:58:52.700 Moore is
00:58:53.980 saying directly
00:58:54.620 that people
00:58:55.160 voting for
00:58:55.760 Republicans are
00:58:56.700 not that
00:58:57.560 bright.
00:59:00.240 So that
00:59:02.980 wasn't really
00:59:03.580 the best
00:59:05.880 thing to
00:59:06.340 say right
00:59:06.740 before the
00:59:07.180 vote.
00:59:09.860 Do the
00:59:10.720 Democrats
00:59:11.220 ever learn
00:59:13.240 that insulting
00:59:15.100 the actual
00:59:15.780 voters doesn't
00:59:18.480 work as well
00:59:19.100 as you
00:59:19.400 hope?
00:59:19.940 Yeah.
00:59:25.760 And,
00:59:26.440 uh,
00:59:27.020 what was it?
00:59:27.840 Who was it?
00:59:29.020 Adam Carolla
00:59:30.280 who said
00:59:32.080 that Michael
00:59:32.620 Moore looks
00:59:33.320 like a,
00:59:34.040 uh,
00:59:36.100 out-of-work
00:59:37.020 lesbian?
00:59:38.560 Is that
00:59:39.340 what he said?
00:59:41.040 And then
00:59:41.640 somebody on
00:59:42.040 Twitter said,
00:59:43.100 accused,
00:59:44.240 um,
00:59:45.520 accused Adam
00:59:46.240 Carolla of
00:59:46.880 calling Michael
00:59:47.800 Moore a,
00:59:48.520 an overweight
00:59:49.760 lesbian.
00:59:50.860 And then,
00:59:51.560 then he was
00:59:52.560 corrected.
00:59:53.040 No,
00:59:53.220 I didn't say
00:59:53.600 overweight lesbian.
00:59:54.540 I said out-of-work
00:59:55.420 lesbian.
00:59:56.480 So,
00:59:58.060 if you could
00:59:58.780 get that
00:59:59.320 clear.
01:00:00.480 By the way,
01:00:01.020 I love
01:00:01.320 lesbians,
01:00:01.860 so I'm not
01:00:02.420 insulting them.
01:00:03.720 I just think
01:00:04.200 it's,
01:00:04.540 it's,
01:00:05.140 it's interesting
01:00:05.960 what other
01:00:06.500 people are
01:00:06.880 saying about
01:00:07.340 other people,
01:00:08.000 right?
01:00:08.200 I'm not,
01:00:08.620 I'm not
01:00:09.020 jumping on
01:00:09.820 the make
01:00:11.000 you fun
01:00:11.320 of Michael
01:00:11.660 Moore for
01:00:12.100 his appearance
01:00:12.620 thing.
01:00:13.640 I used
01:00:14.020 to.
01:00:15.000 I just,
01:00:15.520 I feel
01:00:16.060 like,
01:00:17.420 um,
01:00:18.200 you know
01:00:18.480 what it
01:00:18.640 is?
01:00:18.840 Let me
01:00:20.880 be a little
01:00:21.580 transparent for
01:00:22.340 you.
01:00:23.460 When you're
01:00:24.380 not much
01:00:25.240 of a public
01:00:25.800 figure,
01:00:27.200 or you're
01:00:27.560 not a public
01:00:28.000 figure,
01:00:29.020 dumping on
01:00:30.180 somebody for
01:00:30.720 their looks
01:00:31.420 doesn't feel
01:00:34.140 as evil.
01:00:36.460 But when you
01:00:37.320 become more
01:00:37.900 prominent in,
01:00:39.180 let's say,
01:00:39.480 talking about
01:00:39.920 politics,
01:00:40.520 as,
01:00:40.960 as happened
01:00:41.460 to me,
01:00:42.440 I don't feel
01:00:43.520 like you
01:00:44.520 should model
01:00:45.100 that.
01:00:46.180 Now,
01:00:46.360 I'm just
01:00:46.560 talking about
01:00:46.960 myself.
01:00:47.420 You can
01:00:47.620 do anything
01:00:47.940 you want.
01:00:49.040 Right?
01:00:49.520 I feel
01:00:50.160 like,
01:00:51.020 because I
01:00:51.860 honestly believe
01:00:52.780 that making
01:00:53.220 fun of people
01:00:53.820 for their
01:00:54.220 physical appearance
01:00:55.100 is just all
01:00:55.680 bad.
01:00:56.360 But when
01:00:56.900 public figures
01:00:58.480 do it,
01:01:00.700 that's a
01:01:01.100 little extra
01:01:01.480 bad.
01:01:02.340 Wouldn't you
01:01:02.720 agree?
01:01:04.240 You know,
01:01:04.560 don't you think
01:01:05.280 that I should
01:01:05.680 be held to a
01:01:06.360 higher standard
01:01:07.060 than you
01:01:07.820 should?
01:01:09.200 Wouldn't you
01:01:09.580 agree with
01:01:09.920 that?
01:01:10.600 That I should
01:01:11.180 be,
01:01:11.560 because I'm a
01:01:12.100 public figure,
01:01:12.880 and I talk
01:01:13.360 about politics,
01:01:14.500 don't you think
01:01:15.000 I should be
01:01:15.360 held to a
01:01:15.680 higher standard
01:01:16.260 than the
01:01:16.720 rest of
01:01:17.000 you?
01:01:18.560 Yeah,
01:01:19.160 I think so.
01:01:20.560 You know,
01:01:20.980 with great
01:01:21.400 power comes
01:01:22.060 great responsibility,
01:01:23.480 but even
01:01:23.860 with average
01:01:24.500 power comes
01:01:25.200 some average
01:01:26.400 responsibility.
01:01:27.580 You have to
01:01:28.060 take it up
01:01:28.460 a little bit.
01:01:29.820 And so,
01:01:30.280 in my opinion,
01:01:31.040 if I can be
01:01:32.100 some tiny
01:01:33.340 little voice
01:01:34.700 that says,
01:01:36.240 let's not
01:01:36.920 focus on
01:01:37.460 people's
01:01:37.800 appearance,
01:01:39.420 let's not
01:01:39.940 do that.
01:01:40.820 We can do
01:01:41.540 better than
01:01:41.900 that.
01:01:43.140 I think
01:01:43.500 that's useful.
01:01:45.000 Trump does
01:01:46.480 it all
01:01:46.720 the time,
01:01:47.380 but he
01:01:47.700 does it
01:01:48.140 sort of
01:01:48.520 in a,
01:01:49.480 let's say,
01:01:49.920 a competitive
01:01:50.560 context,
01:01:51.480 which is
01:01:51.980 really different
01:01:52.560 than anything
01:01:53.200 we're doing.
01:01:54.840 Plus,
01:01:55.340 it works.
01:01:57.620 When Trump
01:01:58.320 does it,
01:01:58.680 it actually
01:01:59.000 changes reality.
01:02:01.140 If you and
01:02:01.880 I make fun
01:02:02.420 of somebody,
01:02:02.860 we're just
01:02:03.160 assholes.
01:02:04.440 That doesn't
01:02:05.000 change anything.
01:02:06.220 We're not
01:02:06.880 going to
01:02:07.120 shame
01:02:07.480 Michael Moore
01:02:08.080 into getting
01:02:10.520 an upgrade
01:02:11.360 on his look
01:02:11.960 or something.
01:02:12.360 And by
01:02:13.660 the way,
01:02:14.020 I'm nothing
01:02:14.580 to look at
01:02:15.060 either,
01:02:15.380 so there's
01:02:16.080 nothing I
01:02:16.460 could add
01:02:18.120 to that.
01:02:19.240 All right.
01:02:20.580 I guess
01:02:21.140 we'll find
01:02:21.540 out more
01:02:21.900 about
01:02:23.260 Musk's
01:02:25.520 tortious
01:02:25.960 claims.
01:02:28.520 All right,
01:02:29.100 did I miss
01:02:29.460 anything else
01:02:30.180 I missed?
01:02:34.200 Rob
01:02:34.600 Ryder.
01:02:34.920 I think
01:02:39.200 it's time
01:02:39.780 for a
01:02:40.860 closing
01:02:41.700 simultaneous
01:02:42.540 sip,
01:02:43.220 and by
01:02:43.520 closing I
01:02:44.100 mean for
01:02:44.560 the YouTube
01:02:45.040 and Spotify
01:02:45.700 people,
01:02:46.520 as opposed
01:02:47.460 to locals
01:02:48.520 that I'll
01:02:48.780 talk to
01:02:49.060 you in a
01:02:49.320 moment.
01:02:50.220 Are you
01:02:50.520 ready?
01:02:51.600 Go.
01:02:56.280 Correction?
01:02:56.980 Correction.
01:02:57.940 I've got a
01:02:58.320 correction in
01:02:58.780 the comments
01:02:59.200 here from
01:03:00.460 Mavro,
01:03:02.060 who informs
01:03:03.300 us that she
01:03:04.140 is bloody
01:03:05.080 gorgeous.
01:03:06.620 I think
01:03:07.280 she.
01:03:08.500 I'm hoping
01:03:09.140 you're she.
01:03:11.060 Bloody
01:03:11.540 gorgeous.
01:03:12.660 And I do
01:03:13.180 not disagree
01:03:13.660 with that,
01:03:14.380 because I've
01:03:14.820 noted that
01:03:15.240 the people
01:03:15.540 on Locals
01:03:16.060 are unusually
01:03:17.100 sexy.
01:03:19.060 That's a
01:03:19.660 thing.
01:03:20.540 In fact,
01:03:21.380 if you
01:03:21.780 subscribe to
01:03:22.440 the Locals
01:03:22.900 platform,
01:03:24.620 you become
01:03:25.940 immediately
01:03:26.940 10%
01:03:28.440 sexier.
01:03:29.520 And I
01:03:29.900 promise that.
01:03:31.000 That's
01:03:31.280 guaranteed.
01:03:32.060 You will
01:03:32.360 have,
01:03:33.300 you can
01:03:33.860 have your
01:03:34.120 money back
01:03:34.820 from somebody
01:03:36.180 else,
01:03:36.500 not from
01:03:36.840 me,
01:03:37.440 but somebody
01:03:38.320 will give
01:03:38.600 you money
01:03:38.960 if it's
01:03:39.900 not true.
01:03:40.880 I promise.
01:03:43.560 Yeah.
01:03:44.080 Every one
01:03:44.500 of you
01:03:44.760 is sexier
01:03:45.400 the moment
01:03:45.740 you subscribe.
01:03:47.020 Because you'll
01:03:47.700 be smarter.
01:03:49.180 You'll be a
01:03:49.800 go-getter.
01:03:51.760 You will
01:03:52.120 have identified
01:03:52.720 yourself as
01:03:53.800 above
01:03:55.520 the unwashed
01:03:57.280 masses.
01:03:58.140 More educated,
01:03:59.040 more kind,
01:04:00.200 more useful,
01:04:00.860 successful,
01:04:01.360 and more
01:04:02.160 successful.
01:04:04.600 All right,
01:04:05.360 YouTube,
01:04:05.860 that's all
01:04:06.240 for today.
01:04:06.900 I'll talk
01:04:07.240 to you
01:04:07.660 tomorrow.
01:04:08.440 You
01:04:08.900 You