Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1929 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About Trump's Announcement, War With The Cartels And More

00:00:00.000 ever experienced. Do you think we'll be talking about Trump's announcement? Oh yeah. Trump announces

00:00:07.400 and the media pounces. You like that? Trump announces and the media pounces. Very proud of

00:00:14.520 that. Now, if you'd like to take this experience up to the level where nobody's ever seen before,

00:00:20.680 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or chalice aside, a canteen jug or flask,

00:00:25.660 a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for

00:00:31.860 the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here today, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:36.180 It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go. We have a party foul. Party foul. Hold on. Hold

00:00:49.780 on. Stephanie Jackson, your coffee is cold now. Stephanie, Stephanie, I can't do everything

00:00:58.360 for you. You need to be prepared. Set your alarm a little bit early or drink a little bit slower.

00:01:07.000 Try to hit the point. Try to hit the point next time, Stephanie. Stephanie, we trust you. We know

00:01:14.020 you can do it. Take your game up a level, Stephanie. All right. Well, we'll talk about Trump, but let me

00:01:27.260 give a few minutes for people to come in. The FBI's Director Wray says the FBI is, quote,

00:01:34.620 extremely concerned about TikTok operating in the U.S. No, they're not. No, they're not. Do you know

00:01:44.360 what extremely concerned looks like? The pandemic. Extremely concerned is when you stop all travel

00:01:53.980 from China because there is a virus over there. We're extremely concerned. We're all going to wear

00:01:59.660 masks and take vaccinations. And that's extremely concerned. World War II. Extremely concerned

00:02:09.020 about Hitler. So concerned we mounted a, you know, an army ourselves and attacked. That's what 0.56

00:02:15.420 extremely concerned looks like. Do you know what extremely concerned does not look like? Oh, I'm

00:02:22.640 extremely concerned. That's what it doesn't look like. Extremely concerned would be, at the very

00:02:31.760 minimum, turn it off. Turn it off. And then figure out if you should turn it back on. You don't leave

00:02:41.020 it on when you're extremely concerned. You turn it off first. Figure out if there's a problem. Maybe turn

00:02:47.980 it back on. Maybe. But it's just a fat lie that they're extremely concerned. They're not.

00:02:58.220 Now, here's what I believe is why they're not extremely concerned. I believe that Republican

00:03:06.140 and maybe just government people, ignorance is really killing us. Because I believe this is a case

00:03:13.860 of ignorance. And this is what I mean. I believe when the FBI thinks of TikTok as a threat, they think

00:03:21.160 of the data privacy part of the threat. Ooh, China will find out too much about our citizens. Which is

00:03:27.920 true. But that's not the threat. The threat is that they can program our brains directly through

00:03:35.020 their product. Do you think that the director of the FBI even understands that? I say no. I would say

00:03:43.700 his actions and his words suggest he doesn't even know what the threat is. He literally doesn't

00:03:49.880 know what the threat is. Because I would say that out of 100 people, only two out of 100 would

00:03:57.620 understand the threat. Now, most of my audience does because I understand the threat. So I explained

00:04:03.560 it to you. But who explained it to Director Ray? Who talked to Director Ray, who has my level

00:04:11.300 of persuasion experience? And said to him, oh, you're missing the big show here. The show

00:04:18.340 is that they're programming our minds. It's not about data privacy. I mean, it's also about

00:04:23.700 data privacy. That's not unimportant. But data privacy is something I would be extremely concerned

00:04:32.360 about, but maybe not doing that much about it. Right? Doesn't that sound like he's only

00:04:37.880 extremely concerned about some data privacy? If the question was, you know, they're programming

00:04:44.680 our brains, or if they're not actively doing it, you know, they could turn it on at any minute.

00:04:50.440 They just turn a button, you know, figuratively speaking, and we get more of something or less

00:04:55.880 of something that TikTok users do. Why in the world does he pretend not to understand that?

00:05:03.320 Now, let me ask you, have you ever heard anybody in the government say what I just said? That the

00:05:09.320 real problem is that they're programming us? I haven't heard it. I've only heard data privacy,

00:05:15.880 which means that our policy is based on ignorance. I'm not wrong. I'm not wrong. Anybody who understood

00:05:24.200 the problem would have turned it off immediately? Do you know who understands the problem?

00:05:32.680 Trump. Trump does. Do you know why Trump understands the problem? Because he understands persuasion.

00:05:41.320 He knows how he does it. He knows that if his message were on TikTok, it would be more effective.

00:05:47.240 He tried to ban it. Now he got it shut down. And I, you know, that's on him a little bit too.

00:05:51.880 But trust, but Trump actually understood the risk. Do you know what? So that's what extremely

00:05:59.160 concerned looks like. Trump was extremely concerned. He tried to turn it off. That's what extremely

00:06:06.120 concerned looks like. I'm not wrong. Right? A little bit concerned is talking about it. Extremely concerned,

00:06:15.640 you try to turn it off. There's no argument there. Ivermectin continues to entertain. I did not think

00:06:24.760 that the ivermectin story could be as deep as it is or last as long. But listen to these two stories at

00:06:32.040 the same time. Okay? Now, nothing about what I say will be pro or anti-ivermectin. I'm past that

00:06:41.960 conversation. We're just going to talk about how it's being handled in the news, right? So at the same

00:06:47.720 time, the Daily Beast is calling out Dr. Simone Gold. She was part of that group of rogue doctors. 0.63

00:06:56.520 Have I ever mentioned my opinion of rogue doctors?

00:07:03.960 The problem with rogue doctors is that for everyone that's, like, right and, you know,

00:07:10.280 sounding the alarm and we should really listen to them, those exist. There's going to be five who are

00:07:16.200 frauds. Maybe ten. Maybe ten who are frauds for every real one who really got the right answer first.

00:07:24.520 So how do you know? How many of you believe that this Dr. Simone Gold and her organization were genuine?

00:07:33.560 Because it turns out that they're being called a COVID disinformation organization. Of course,

00:07:39.160 that has to do with their claims about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in particular. But apparently

00:07:46.200 they raised a ton of money and his founder, Simone Gold, used some of that money to buy a mansion

00:07:52.360 where she lives with her 20 years younger underwear model boyfriend. She took a hundred thousand

00:08:00.280 dollar private jet trip and she actually went to jail for a January 6th protest where she was accused of 1.00

00:08:09.320 not using her medical training to help an injured policeman. Did that really happen?

00:08:15.880 There's, there's, there's a report that she was near somebody who got injured and just kept protesting

00:08:23.640 instead of helping an injured person. She is a doctor. I don't know. It's not illegal, didn't break any laws,

00:08:32.680 but. So how many of you thought that Dr. Simone Gold and their hydroxychloroquine little organization,

00:08:40.600 how many of you thought that they were legitimate? Is anybody saying, oh, shit, I thought they were real? 0.99

00:08:48.760 Anybody? Oh, a lot of us. A lot of us. Now, to my credit, I never thought they were real. 0.99

00:08:56.840 Can you confirm that for me? The people who've been watching me since the beginning,

00:09:02.280 can you confirm that I always called bullshit on that group? Confirmed, right? 0.78

00:09:08.760 Now, I'm not saying the hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin who work or don't work. I'm just

00:09:13.480 too bored with that conversation. It'd be great to know the answer someday, but I'm bored with that.

00:09:20.040 But I did call bullshit on it. So I get the win on that. Will you give me the win? 0.88

00:09:23.720 Will you give me a clean win on calling that bullshit? Yeah. Now, but I want to be clear, 1.00

00:09:30.200 I didn't call bullshit on the drugs. I don't have a firm opinion on that. I have a, let's see,

00:09:39.320 statistical opinion, but I don't have any certainty about it. All right. So at the same time that we

00:09:45.840 found out that one prominent group pushing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were apparently more about

00:09:53.560 the fundraising than the science. At the same time, we find out that this, that exchange, FTX,

00:10:02.040 apparently they were the major funder of an ivermectin study that debunked ivermectin.

00:10:08.920 Could this be any more interesting? How in the world did this FTX get connected to every,

00:10:17.800 every ugly thing in the world? Like, it's just connected to everything you don't like one way or

00:10:24.280 another. Now that doesn't mean, that doesn't mean the study was flawed. A lot of people said it was

00:10:31.960 flawed. I'm no expert there. But don't you have to ask some pretty big questions when a fraudulent

00:10:39.880 organization does a study that debunks something that, if it had been proven the other way, would

00:10:47.400 have been, you know, this huge game changer? Yeah. You gotta, you gotta raise one eyebrow on that. One

00:10:53.800 eyebrow up. All right. All right. Let's talk about Twitter 2.0. I guess that, that's what Musk,

00:11:02.280 I think Musk is calling it that. So at midnight, I guess he sent out last night, he sent out the

00:11:08.520 staff an email to everybody that they have until 5 p.m. Thursday to decide if they want to be part of

00:11:15.880 Twitter 2.0. Now, Twitter 2.0 will require, as Musk said, long hours and a focus on engineering. So it'll be

00:11:25.400 kind of a big sacrifice and very, very difficult. What do you think of that? Good management,

00:11:34.040 bad management? Because we all get to watch, you know, one of the great entrepreneurs of our time

00:11:41.400 doing what he does. Now, Twitter apparently had a culture that was maybe at a little bit of odds with

00:11:51.720 the, um, let's say the, um, let's say the, the startup mentality. So Twitter had gone past the

00:11:57.640 startup mentality and they were in sort of a comfortable situation, even though they weren't

00:12:01.400 making money, oddly enough. And I saw this, uh, in a, in a related story. Are you watching, uh,

00:12:11.080 Musk fire his own employees on Twitter? Oh my God. It's, it's horrifying.

00:12:17.880 At the same time, it's electrifying. At the same time, it's fascinating. At the same time,

00:12:28.440 it's educational. It is everything. It's like, it's, it's funny. It's horrible. It's, it's everything.

00:12:39.080 But here's what I took from it. There were a number of employees who thought it would be safe

00:12:43.320 to insult their, the owner of their own company somewhat rudely in public. What caused them to

00:12:52.680 think they could do that? What was it that caused the Twitter employees to think that they'd be safe

00:13:00.920 criticizing Elon Musk in public?

00:13:02.920 They found out quickly that was not the case. I don't know because we can't read their minds,

00:13:12.680 but let us speculate just for fun, for entertainment. Don't they think, don't you think they thought

00:13:18.360 they were kind of protected in terms of free speech? They thought they had free speech, but other people

00:13:24.920 didn't. Right? They thought they were free to say that because it was their opinion. It was their

00:13:33.320 honest opinion. So they thought, well, I can put my honest opinion anywhere I want because we got this

00:13:38.760 free speech and stuff. But it turns out that, you know, companies don't have free speech per se for

00:13:45.800 employees. And they found that out. Musk trained them. Now, I do love the fact that Musk is making a very

00:13:53.640 obvious big, you know, psychological message that the old way is dead and you can only stay under the

00:14:02.600 new assumptions. I think he's doing a really good job in communicating his priorities.

00:14:10.680 I don't know if it'll work, but I do think he needed to do it. I would agree with, at least from the

00:14:16.920 outside, it looks like he couldn't just take the existing staff and make them do new things. They're

00:14:22.680 sort of old dogs who needed to learn new tricks. So I think it was a combination of putting in new

00:14:27.880 blood plus, you know, weeding out the ones who think they have some kind of entitlement, I guess.

00:14:36.280 So he got rid of their free lunches because they weren't eating it much and it was expensive.

00:14:41.000 And the other thing he did was he's bringing back,

00:14:44.600 uh, can you give me the names? Uh, the two people, the two people who he fired from Twitter,

00:14:53.160 he hired back, uh, Ligman Johnson, Ligman Johnson, but they were, they were pranksters.

00:15:00.360 So they did a prank where the media thought they were two fired Twitter employees, but it was just

00:15:04.440 a prank. They just stood outside the headquarters with boxes, like they had just cleaned out their,

00:15:09.960 their desks, which is fricking hilarious. All right. So, so, so, so Musk actually posed with a

00:15:19.560 picture with the two of them with his arms around them saying, welcome back to Twitter.

00:15:25.640 Now you're definitely getting a, uh, advanced course in how to do marketing without a marketing

00:15:31.480 department. So has he proven for sure that firing the Twitter marketing department was a good move?

00:15:38.840 Can we give him that? Can we now say, oh yeah, well, you know, because traffic is way up.

00:15:47.160 Attention on Twitter is way up. He's probably attracting engineers at this point. He's probably,

00:15:53.400 some people say, oh, that could be interesting now. I'll go there. I don't know. Yeah. If you judge it

00:16:00.760 by how angry the employees say they are, it would look like a mess, right? But that's not how you judge

00:16:09.480 things because he's, he's intentionally by strategy, uh, putting pressure on them.

00:16:16.440 And that's capitalism and it's a free market. And, you know, they should be fairly employable. If

00:16:22.840 they're working at Twitter, that should make you fairly employable somewhere else. Or maybe it works

00:16:28.120 the other way. I don't know. Um, but watching Musk fire people for their opinions is the ultimate karma

00:16:36.920 completes the loop, right? Because Twitter was under the, you know, the company was sort of under the

00:16:43.560 operating assumption that they didn't have to apply by free speech because they were a private company

00:16:50.360 or they were a, you know, a company. They weren't the government. And now Musk is informing them that

00:16:56.920 those same rules apply to them, that he can fire any employee he wants because it's a private company.

00:17:03.720 Now it's private. So I don't know. Karma's really doing its thing. Let's talk about Trump and his

00:17:10.360 announcement. Um, I missed the first few minutes because I had some technical difficulties last

00:17:15.560 night, but somebody told me he used the phrase golden, golden age. Did he, did he say that the first

00:17:23.880 two years were a golden age? You know, what's interesting about that? It might have been a hundred

00:17:33.080 percent of us would go back to that, wouldn't we? Because it was pre-pandemic. So, you know,

00:17:37.880 you can't say it's all about Biden. It's the pandemic as well, but golden age. Huh?

00:17:47.320 It's a catchy phrase. I wonder where he got it. Um, I, when I watched the presentation,

00:17:55.560 I said to myself, he is clearly keeping his energy low or he has low energy. Now he raised his energy

00:18:02.440 later. So it looks like it was intentional. And I was waiting for his critics to say low energy

00:18:11.720 and low energy Jeb. How long did it take his critics to say it was a low energy Jeb speech?

00:18:19.000 About a minute. Yeah, I think CNN pundit and MSNBC pundit, uh, both said low energy. Now, what did you

00:18:28.440 think? Those of you saw it, did it look low energy to you? Or did it look like he was trying to be more

00:18:33.240 serious? Did it look like low energy or strategy? Go. Low energy or strategy? Serious or just low energy?

00:18:43.480 Strategy. Strategy? I think it was both.

00:18:53.400 I think it was both. But on top of that, I think he might have had some problem that day.

00:19:01.160 I think he might have been a little sick. Did anybody? He looked nervous, yes. But the nervous

00:19:08.040 part didn't make sense. Here are some things we can speculate. Speculation number one, he was a little

00:19:16.360 under the weather. Do you think he's been getting much sleep in the past week or so? I doubt it.

00:19:24.760 Imagine what his life was like before making the announcement. Imagine the conversations with his

00:19:30.680 wife. Imagine the conversation with Don Jr., with Eric, with Ivanka, with Jared. And how many of them

00:19:41.160 were saying, dear God, do not run. Please, please, for the good of the family, the family can't handle

00:19:47.320 this. You know, just, just take your win for the first term and go away. Do you think that the family

00:19:54.600 was, yeah, we're on your side, let's do this? Now, I think they were all treating him respectfully,

00:20:02.440 but I don't think he was getting his family on his side in a way that he wanted. When he introduced

00:20:07.400 his family, he introduced Eric. Right? I think Eric was the family member in attendance.

00:20:16.280 Correct me if I'm wrong, but Eric had the least role in his last election. Right? I mean, he was

00:20:24.200 involved, but he had the smallest role. But he was the only one at the announcement. Now, we do have

00:20:30.040 reasons why the others didn't come. Apparently, Don Jr. was on a hunting trip and there was a weather

00:20:35.160 problem and he couldn't get home. Does that sound true to you? Do you think Don Jr. was on a hunting trip

00:20:42.680 and he couldn't get home? Could be. Yeah, it could be. Because if you follow him on Instagram,

00:20:51.240 his hunting trips tend to be things like, you know, fly somewhere and then you take a little,

00:20:58.120 like a little aquatic plane into the bush in Alaska and, you know, hunt bears and take your little plane

00:21:04.600 back and stuff. So he does do, he does do the kind of trips where if you were going to get stranded

00:21:10.120 for a few days because of weather? Yeah. Yeah, but it's actually a perfectly

00:21:17.000 understandable thing. Now, well, let me take it to the next level.

00:21:22.360 If your father were going to announce for the presidency, wouldn't you check the weather forecast

00:21:30.520 before you went on the trip?

00:21:31.480 Would you take that risk? Would you take the risk that maybe you couldn't get back?

00:21:41.880 I don't know.

00:21:46.600 We'll see. I mean, Don Jr. retweeted the announcement. So he's showing support on online.

00:21:53.800 It is plausible. It's plausible. But you have to ask the question. I can't imagine that the family

00:22:01.720 is too keen on him running again. It's hard to imagine they would be. But Ivanka issued a

00:22:09.880 very well-written statement about why she wasn't there. And I'll tell you, Ivanka just nails it every

00:22:15.960 time. Her statement was, you know, very supportive. You know, unambiguously supportive. Not the kind of

00:22:22.920 bullshit where you think they're using weasel words to support. It was just full support. You know, loving 0.99

00:22:28.440 and support. But she said her kids are a certain age. And then she mentioned the age of the kids. And

00:22:36.520 they're like 6 to 11 or something. They're in that range somewhere. That's exactly the age where you

00:22:42.920 don't want to be gone. Right? Well, really, there's lots of ages you don't want to be gone.

00:22:47.560 But that one's really a critical one, isn't it? That's like a really important one. So I'm all

00:22:54.040 on board on Ivanka not sacrificing her family for the good of the country. Can we agree? I think she

00:23:01.720 would be a huge asset. But I don't think I want her to do that. I want her to take care of her kids. 0.86

00:23:09.160 She earned it. I mean, she did way more than anybody would be expected to do in the first

00:23:15.000 administration. Ooh, text me while I'm doing my show. How important is this? Oh, okay.

00:23:30.680 I wanted to keep it classy rather than rally-wise. Yeah, it looked like you wanted to keep it classy.

00:23:35.320 All right. So let's analyze his persuasion. Do you think that his energy that he showed

00:23:50.600 was good persuasion? Because here's what I saw. I saw that even his critics were having trouble

00:24:00.280 doing the, it's a dark, scary speech. The biggest problem with Trump is that he scares Democrats.

00:24:07.960 Am I right? He scares them. Because he talks like, you know, they think, oh, no, it's Mussolini.

00:24:14.840 When they see him talking, and I will, you know, kick everybody's butt, and I will make everything 0.99

00:24:20.440 great, and we will go to glory. They say that's a fascist. But if he talks like Chuck Schumer, 1.00

00:24:28.280 yeah, well, we're going to look at the budget really hard, and we're going to take a look at this

00:24:35.640 and try to get some bipartisan support, right? So he basically did his impression of a boring politician,

00:24:45.240 because that's what the public seems to want. I think, so, so number one, I don't think it was 100%

00:24:54.120 intentional. I don't think his energy level was 100% intentional. I do think he meant to keep it

00:25:00.920 professional. So that part was intentional. But the energy looked like there was something going

00:25:07.480 on with him in his personal life. Would anybody disagree? Did anybody pick up, there's just

00:25:12.360 something going on in his personal life? Maybe the announcement himself, maybe some, maybe sick,

00:25:17.320 maybe something else. Yeah. Maybe old. At first I thought it was age, but when he got off the

00:25:25.160 teleprompter, he, his energy picked up, and then he was closer to his regular self.

00:25:31.240 Now here's another speculation. Did it seem like he was having a hard time seeing the

00:25:37.720 teleprompter? I felt like he couldn't see the teleprompter. Can you think of a reason that

00:25:45.320 would be true? I can. Why would he not be able to see the teleprompter in that event when in all the

00:25:52.680 other events he could? Not age. That's possible. It's possible he needs glasses and won't wear them.

00:26:02.200 But I have another possibility. I believe that the professionals who do the, you know, the technology

00:26:10.040 at Mar-a-Lago are not the same as the professionals who help a president or a campaign. I think he's

00:26:17.800 relying on less qualified assistance at the moment, especially because he was home. I mean,

00:26:24.120 he was literally home. So whatever. So here's my guess. I think they put the, uh, maybe you'll find

00:26:31.240 the sound, but it looks like the teleprompters were maybe too far away or maybe, you know,

00:26:36.520 too wide or something. Maybe they had some, you know, glare on them or something. But he looked like he

00:26:42.120 was struggling to read it. And at one point I thought he read it wrong. Like he said something

00:26:47.800 that I didn't even think made sense, but he was reading it. So I don't know. That's what it looked

00:26:52.920 like. I guess we have some questions here. But some said he had no new policy suggestions,

00:27:01.320 but he did say, uh, execute, uh, execute dealers, drug dealers. And he did say war on the cartels.

00:27:11.080 Isn't that new? Isn't that, uh, that's pretty new. And isn't it the most important issue?

00:27:20.920 So did he manage to come up with something bold and new on the most important issue in the country,

00:27:25.880 in my opinion? And it was, it was reported as he didn't say anything new. Did that actually happen?

00:27:33.080 Yeah. He just said attack Mexico and it was reported as nothing new. So here we go, right?

00:27:40.840 Here we go. It's like, first of all, uh, Daniel Dale from CNN did a fact check on, on Trump,

00:27:49.320 but he was, you know, he, of course, the fact check, everything is false. Basically everything

00:27:55.080 Trump said was not true, which I picked up as well. Did you pick that up? That most of what

00:28:01.720 Trump said was not true. You could all tell, right? I mean, I don't know what was true, but pretty much

00:28:09.320 the vast majority of his claims were so out of context or just completely made up.

00:28:16.120 I mean, yeah. Now compare that to Biden's lies. They're a little bit different. You know,

00:28:26.280 when, when, when Trump is, you know, slinging his bullshit, it sounds like a salesperson and it sounds 1.00

00:28:33.320 like, you know, big, big first offers and it sounds like he's negotiating with the public. And I feel like 1.00

00:28:39.720 I, I feel it in context. The context is, you know, who Trump is, you know, he overclaims and then you

00:28:48.440 just bake that into your thinking. But with Biden, he's just lying. It feels, it feels like a lower

00:28:55.400 level. Like they're both lying about everything, stipulated, stipulated. They're both lying about

00:29:02.440 everything. As presidents do. But I do think, but I think one does it with a salesman's flair and

00:29:11.560 one with a politician's flair and it feels different. All right. Let's talk about, well,

00:29:23.080 we'll get back to fentanyl in a minute here. He didn't really have any visual persuasion this time,

00:29:28.840 did he? It was visual in terms of he had American flags behind him and blah, blah, but I'm talking

00:29:37.080 about a visual for his message. Build the wall. You could see the wall. He would just say it's a big,

00:29:43.800 beautiful wall with a door in it and you just would see it. He didn't really have anything that

00:29:49.880 you could see, right? I mean, war on the cartels is a little more concept-y. You can kind of see it,

00:29:56.040 but yeah, he needs, he needs more of a visual. All right. So the other thing I have a complaint of

00:30:04.120 is he talked about bringing America back to glory. He wants America to go back to glory. He said it

00:30:11.160 twice, maybe three times. That is a terrible word. Yeah, get rid of that word. What does that sound like

00:30:19.320 when you hear it? Glory? It sounds like a fascist. It sounds like a fascist talk. We'll bring our,

00:30:28.840 we'll bring our country to glory. The Roman Empire, the Third Reich to glory. Now, who doesn't know 0.98

00:30:37.640 that sounds that way? Like that? I feel like he's off his game a little bit there. That's not a word you

00:30:44.200 should use three times. That's a word you should use zero times. So get rid of glory. That's just,

00:30:51.640 that's a distraction. Yeah, there's a million ways to say that without that word.

00:30:58.680 All right. Here's how the critics are talking about his speech. I heard this a couple of times,

00:31:07.080 that Trump is, quote, a twice impeached insurrectionist. It's not an exact quote. But

00:31:15.480 didn't you hear people saying twice impeached and then January 6th? He's a twice impeached insurrectionist.

00:31:26.280 It's, I guess that's going to be their go-to play. Because I don't think they all thought of it

00:31:31.000 spontaneously. Maybe they did. I predicted that he might tease a Carrie Lake just by mentioning 0.73

00:31:39.720 her. He didn't mention her, did he? I didn't catch every minute. Did he mention Carrie Lake? I don't

00:31:44.360 think so. Nope. He didn't mention anybody by name who was a competitor or in the race, did he?

00:31:51.720 I don't think he was naming names. Oh, he did mention Herschel Walker, right? Yeah, I caught that. Okay.

00:32:01.080 Yeah, I don't think he wanted to distract attention from himself. Maybe that was the right call.

00:32:07.960 It would have been more exciting if he had teased a vice president, but it might not be a mistake to

00:32:14.200 put the attention on himself at this point. I could see that.

00:32:18.040 Here's an MSNBC opinion. It doesn't matter who said it. I would give credit to whoever said this,

00:32:27.960 but it doesn't matter. It's the MSNBC opinion. And this is from a written piece. But it's no surprise,

00:32:35.160 Trump is trotting out the same old trash. The core of his appeal, after all, includes a refusal to admit 0.99

00:32:41.960 failure. Is that a core to his appeal? It's a feature. It's a feature. But is it? Is it in the

00:32:54.040 top three? Is that what his supporters think? You know, I really like it when he's wrong and he doesn't

00:33:02.120 admit it. That's what I like. Yeah, I'm not, I don't care about all the things he accomplished in the

00:33:09.320 economy. But boy, yeah, it's that not admitting when he is wrong thing. I don't, does MSNBC really

00:33:19.240 think that? Like that's the core of his appeal? And then they talked about him saying that, quote,

00:33:28.120 I think if they win, I should get all the credit. If they lose, I should not be, report that like

00:33:35.000 that was serious. Like he actually said that as a matter of fact. Oh yeah, if I, if they win,

00:33:41.880 I should get all the credit. If they lose, it should be their fault. It was clearly a joke

00:33:48.200 when he said it, clearly. It could not be more clearly a joke. But they reported it like he just

00:33:54.600 said it like it was serious. And here we go again. All right.

00:34:02.200 And then they said he included in his speech the usual racist dog whistles.

00:34:07.880 Did anybody hear any racist dog whistles? Do I have a hearing problem? Do I need to get my hearing

00:34:15.240 checked because I'm missing the whistles? What would be an example of a racist dog whistle in the speech?

00:34:23.720 Glory? I didn't, I didn't hear any. No, I didn't hear all of it, but I didn't hear any.

00:34:32.760 All right. You didn't hear it either. Yeah. America. But, but the MSNBC people can just like slip

00:34:40.040 that into a, an opinion piece without any kind of, uh, exclamation, explanation.

00:34:47.720 All right. Let's talk about fentanyl because it has a lot to do with, uh, Trump. Um,

00:34:57.640 all right. So he, he said he'd wage a war on the cartels. And also he wanted death penalty for the

00:35:05.320 dealers. I think he was, I think he meant the fentanyl dealers and the big ones, but I'd like

00:35:10.520 him to clarify that a little bit better. Somebody says, stop making excuses for his narcissism.

00:35:17.320 So, uh, Tyrannus, whose name actually has anus right in it. Do you think that was his 0.92

00:35:26.680 narcissism when he smiled and said, I'll take credit if they win and it's their fault if they lose?

00:35:32.760 You think that was actually narcissism? Yeah. You think, you think your therapist would

00:35:37.320 say, well, that's something I got to work on. Look at that narcissism. Or would they say,

00:35:43.240 that's an obvious joke?

00:35:47.080 Well, you decide. So since, uh, Trump does not say what wage war on the cartels means,

00:35:53.160 there's no reason to think it means any more than we're already doing. Don't you think, uh,

00:35:57.960 you know, the border control people think they're waging war on the cartels by seizing people as

00:36:05.080 they come across and stuff? I don't know. They probably think they're already doing it.

00:36:08.920 So I don't know what wage war on the cartels means, but I have some suggestions.

00:36:15.400 I have some suggestions. I heard somebody complained that if we attack the cartel operations,

00:36:21.720 that the Mexican government would, you know, we can't do that because the Mexican government

00:36:26.440 would see it as an act of war. To which I said, are you even fucking listening to me? Yes. 0.99

00:36:35.000 I am, I am promoting an act of war against the Mexican government because they're owned by the 1.00

00:36:42.120 cartels. And I also don't care what they think. What are they going to do? Attack us? Is the Mexican 1.00

00:36:49.480 army going to invade the United States? No, they're just going to be really unhappy and say things about

00:36:54.360 it. That's it. The Mexican government is not relevant to this conversation. As soon as you

00:37:00.280 imagine they're a regular government, like, you know, with a government we should listen to and

00:37:05.160 respect and all that, it's not that. They're owned by the cartels, obviously, because the cartels

00:37:11.720 couldn't operate the way they do if the government had any control. Yeah, the Mexican army, it must be

00:37:17.960 owned by the cartel, obviously. Otherwise, the Mexican army would, you know, take out the cartel.

00:37:26.760 So here's how I would do it. I'd drop a mother of all bombs on one cartel operation 0.87

00:37:33.560 and then I'd tell them that's one so they know there's more coming. Now, is the mother of all bombs

00:37:40.920 the right size munitions for this job? No. No, it would be enormously oversized. Would it kill 0.53

00:37:50.680 innocent civilians? Yes, ones that are around the fentanyl lab. I'm sorry. Oops. Yeah. I mean,

00:38:00.200 nobody wants to kill civilians. You know, I'm not a heartless monster. Nobody wants that. But it's a war.

00:38:07.400 And if you're in a war and you're standing next to a war asset, you better get out of the way.

00:38:14.040 So I would drop a mother of all bomb on whatever is a good target and let them know that's the level

00:38:21.320 that's coming. That's the level that's coming. Because if you send in some people with guns and 0.93

00:38:28.360 some people shoo people, the cartel says, well, we have guns. We'll just get better guns and we'll

00:38:34.440 fight you. You want to drop a bomb on them so there's nobody to shoot back. 1.00

00:38:40.040 Who are they going to shoot at? The plane that flew away? You want to make sure they have no 0.99

00:38:46.040 response. There are just fewer of them. And then just keep doing it. And then other people said,

00:38:52.120 Scott, Scott, Scott. When did, let's talk about the death penalty. So Trump also said death penalty.

00:38:58.520 We assume he means the bigger fentanyl dealers, but that can use some clarification.

00:39:04.840 Now, somebody said, Scott, the death penalty doesn't stop murder. So why would it stop fentanyl?

00:39:11.960 What do you think of that argument? The death penalty does not deter murder, which I believe is true. 0.99

00:39:17.320 Why would it stop anything else?

00:39:24.120 Well, I will see your analogy, which is useless. And I'll top it with my own analogy, which is useless.

00:39:32.040 But at least it's, you know, equals your analogy. It works with terrorism. The reason we haven't been

00:39:39.160 attacked, I think, or at least part of the reason, is that killing the leaders actually works.

00:39:44.920 Killing the people who are good at it means that they would have to be replaced by people who are not 0.77

00:39:51.080 so good at it, or at the very least, less experienced, right? Do you think that 9-11 would have happened 0.71

00:39:58.280 without Bin Laden? Probably not, right? And maybe he trained some people. But if you take out the, 0.86

00:40:07.800 you know, top 10 terrorists from every organization, what is the 11th best terrorist good at?

00:40:16.120 Probably not running a terrorist organization, if you're the 11th best terrorist in the group,

00:40:22.200 right? Paul says, you're joking, right? No. No. You take any organization and get rid of the top 10 best

00:40:32.280 people and what's left. Take Congress. Take Congress and get rid of the top 10 effective people in

00:40:39.080 Congress. What do you have left? Nothing. There's nothing left. You've got Fetterman, right? Do you

00:40:46.760 want Fetterman, you know, basically, you need to kill the top guys until you get down to the Fetterman level 0.95

00:40:53.800 of cartel members? You know, once you're down to Fetterman level, you can maybe ease off a little bit 0.75

00:41:00.360 because he's not going to work that well. All right. Let's see. What else?

00:41:10.120 But I also say that we should try because maybe killing all the cartel, you know, competent people 0.98

00:41:17.400 wouldn't make any difference. You should still do it because they're murderers. 1.00

00:41:24.360 I was arguing that a small fentanyl dealer, you know, somebody who sold a few pills to a friend

00:41:29.240 or something, should not be executed. But then I revised that. I said, if you do it twice,

00:41:37.800 yeah, just you should be executed. If you do it once, that's probably just you doing a favor for a 0.98

00:41:44.600 friend. Oh, I bought some extra pills. Here's some for you. I mean, that's what the lowest end

00:41:50.040 dealing looks like. Just somebody wants to pay for their own drugs. So they buy a little and sell it

00:41:55.800 to some friends. Like, I don't want to kill that guy unless he gets caught twice. The second time he 0.91

00:42:02.040 does it, yeah, kill him. Kill him. That's where my head's at. 1.00

00:42:06.440 Let's see. And I'd also like to point out that killing people who, killing people to reduce the 0.92

00:42:19.960 murder rate, the data doesn't suggest it works. But I'm not a criminologist, so I'm going to need a

00:42:28.920 little fact check on this. How many people are murdered by people who have already been executed?

00:42:33.880 Is it a lot? The people who have already been executed, do they still kill a lot of people after

00:42:40.760 they're dead? As ghosts, perhaps? Because don't people who kill people often kill more than one?

00:42:48.520 I mean, I'm not talking about a mass murder. But if you're a person who's killed one person,

00:42:55.400 I feel like you might do it again. So I would think that 100% of the people who were

00:43:01.400 likely to kill more than one person didn't do it after they died. I don't know.

00:43:10.920 Why do you think there hasn't been more action on fentanyl from our government?

00:43:15.400 What's your theory? Why there's not been more action on fentanyl by our government?

00:43:20.440 I believe it's, I don't think it's money and corruption, believe it or not. I mean,

00:43:28.600 I would easily go to that. You know, I always go to corruption when things don't make sense.

00:43:35.080 Well, it must be corruption. Otherwise, they'd be doing something else.

00:43:38.280 In this case, I'm going to offer you another hypothesis. Republican ignorance. I believe it's 0.98

00:43:45.320 Republican ignorance, specifically Republican. Here's what I mean. If you randomly pick somebody 0.99

00:43:52.920 in Congress, a Republican, and say, what are we going to do about this fentanyl? What would they say?

00:43:58.520 What would the typical Republican in Congress say they're going to do to battle, build the wall?

00:44:04.840 Right. So because they have this build the wall mentality, which would never stop more than five percent,

00:44:13.720 they're blinding themselves to anything that might work.

00:44:17.160 Now, they also want the wall for political reasons.

00:44:20.920 So the Republicans don't want to deal with fentanyl, because if they deal with fentanyl,

00:44:25.960 they can't argue for the wall, which they would want for other reasons as well. Immigration, for example.

00:44:31.720 So the Republicans have trapped themselves in a situation where they need to argue wall, wall, wall,

00:44:39.960 and it takes their ability to be effective on fentanyl completely off the field.

00:44:44.680 The Republicans have failed completely, failed completely, because they think the wall will

00:44:49.720 make a difference. Now, you want to know a Republican who's not poorly informed? Because it's not all of them.

00:44:57.880 And I know some of you are not his fans. Dan Crenshaw. Dan Crenshaw apparently understands the topic.

00:45:07.800 Do you know how I know that? Because he's acting exactly like a person who understands the topic.

00:45:14.040 He's introduced some pretty severe penalties for the cartels and dealers, I guess, on fentanyl.

00:45:22.120 So there would be higher penalties. There would be federal penalties, so he could bypass the soft,

00:45:27.880 local prosecutors. Because the local prosecutor is going to let you out of jail for too easy stuff.

00:45:33.880 So the first part that's good, he'd make it federal. That sounds smart, doesn't it?

00:45:40.520 Wouldn't you agree? Putting a federal crime on that, that feels like a good move. 0.79

00:45:45.400 I don't argue with that. He wants to go after the financial institutions that are hiding the cartel

00:45:53.960 money. We haven't already done that. All right, I'm disappointed that there's something we could

00:46:01.160 have done that we didn't do already. But if Crenshaw thinks there's something to do there,

00:46:06.360 he's probably looked into it. By the way, do you know that Crenshaw is really smart?

00:46:10.200 Even if you disagree with him. He's really smart. So keep that in mind.

00:46:19.960 Yeah, stiffer, stiffer crimes, revoking naturalized citizenship and green cards for those convicted of

00:46:27.880 stuff, stuff. So all of that's good. Do you know what's not on his list? Did you see what's missing?

00:46:36.680 Build the wall. That's how I know that Dan Crenshaw actually understands fentanyl.

00:46:45.240 Because nowhere here he said, build the wall. Because he knows that's not the answer.

00:46:50.120 So when you see the smart people acting, you can identify them right away. Not smart. I'll say

00:46:55.880 well-informed. The well-informed Republicans will not say the wall is an answer. It's just poorly

00:47:01.480 informed. Does anybody disagree? Right? It's just the Republicans are the problem.

00:47:08.840 Because they're wall-obsessed and they can't get past it. And politically they need the wall,

00:47:13.560 so it's wall, wall, wall. So they are the problem. Trump could possibly break that logjam.

00:47:20.520 There is an experimental vaccine for making fentanyl not affect people.

00:47:36.280 So the simulation really hates us. Imagine, if you will, that there was one solution to the

00:47:42.760 fentanyl problem. Just one. And it was a vaccine.

00:47:59.640 That was my Shatner impression.

00:48:01.240 Really? Why? Why? Why? Why does it need to be a vaccination? It couldn't be a pill?

00:48:11.320 It couldn't be a pill. It couldn't be treatment. It couldn't be consulting. It couldn't be a

00:48:18.040 criminal action. It couldn't be military action. It had to be a vaccination. Really?

00:48:23.160 Now, it might have some potential. I mean, vaccination raises all the red flags that it should. But

00:48:32.520 apparently they've figured out how in mice, they haven't tried it in humans, but in mice it seems

00:48:38.040 to turn off just the fentanyl love. So even if a person took it and they became immune to fentanyl,

00:48:47.240 presumably there would still be painkillers that worked on them. Different kinds. Because you

00:48:53.240 don't want to make somebody immune to painkillers. That would be a bad idea. So apparently it's so

00:48:59.640 specific. But, but, it's a vaccination. How long would they have to test this thing before you'd put it

00:49:10.120 in your body? I mean, you wouldn't have to. But it does, it does start to suggest that there might

00:49:18.680 be a suite of things to offer to addicts. You might offer them drug counseling. You might offer

00:49:25.240 them the vaccination as long as they can refuse. You know, well-informed refusal.

00:49:30.040 Yeah, so there might be ways to go to get people help. Anyway, that would be a game changer if that

00:49:41.240 really made a difference. All right. If the government doesn't do anything about fentanyl,

00:49:49.960 and it looks like they won't, you know, because I don't know what are the odds of Trump getting

00:49:54.280 elected and then carrying through on war on the cartels? 20%. If you had to put the odds that

00:50:00.920 Trump first gets elected, so, you know, maybe you say that's a 50-50, I'm not sure where you are on

00:50:07.000 that. But then he has to get elected, but then he actually has to do what he said. So he has to

00:50:12.600 actually, you know, get enough people in the government to say, let's go hard at the cartels.

00:50:17.000 20%? Maybe 20, 25? I don't know. But if the government continues not to be effective, here's

00:50:27.760 what I think is going to happen. I think there's going to be fentanyl vigilantism. Fentanyl

00:50:34.120 vigilantism. And it could take several forms. Now, I'm not recommending it, because vigilantism ends

00:50:41.520 up killing the wrong people, too. So it's a bad idea. I'm only predicting it's likely.

00:50:47.000 If the government continues to do nothing. Scott's against vaccinations now. All right,

00:50:56.260 chick girl, you stupid cunt. You get to be hidden on this channel for being an asshole. Good job. 1.00

00:51:07.440 Here's what the vigilantism would look like. For everyone who deals fentanyl, there's at least

00:51:13.920 one person who would like to narc them out but doesn't want to get caught. There will

00:51:19.680 be a website where you can anonymously name fentanyl dealers. And I think people would use

00:51:28.760 it. Don't you think? Because, yeah. Now, I'm not recommending it, because it has all the dangers

00:51:38.100 you can imagine in that kind of a system. You know, people would, trolls would be putting, you know,

00:51:43.100 people's names on it. It'd just be a mess. But you could imagine it happening. Couldn't you imagine it?

00:51:49.300 If I lived in a neighborhood where the fentanyl dealers were, like, killing everybody in my block,

00:51:55.620 I'd put that name on the list. If it were anonymous, and I trusted that. Now, do you think that will

00:52:02.480 happen? It's the obvious thing that would happen. That the public doesn't necessarily have to kill 0.54

00:52:07.640 these people. All they have to do is name them. It'll take care of itself. Won't it? Because there's

00:52:16.420 always going to be somebody who wants to go take care of business. I don't think they should,

00:52:24.180 but it's going to happen. All right. Here's another idea. How about if the penalty for dealing fentanyl

00:52:35.320 is to lose your privacy forever? That you would be like a pedophile. That if you ever got convicted 0.96

00:52:45.780 for fentanyl, you'd be put on the, it'd be like the pedophile list. Anybody could find that if they

00:52:52.740 live near you? Anybody could know if you should be hired? Yeah, being a fentanyl dealer, if you knew

00:53:03.380 you were doing it, I suppose it might be different if you didn't know you were doing it. Maybe you just

00:53:09.120 ostracize them. Maybe you say, yeah, we're not going to kill you, but you're sure as fuck not 0.99

00:53:15.300 going to live next to me. If you put a fentanyl dealer in my neighborhood, I'd probably vandalize 0.99

00:53:22.680 their house. Maybe every week. Maybe it would be my new hobby. Yeah. I mean, sometimes information

00:53:34.040 is all you need. The public will take care of it. There are enough parents who lost a child.

00:53:41.220 They'll just go kill these people, which I don't recommend. It's a bad idea, but it's going to 0.93

00:53:46.840 happen. How about this one? This is more speculative. What happens when drone technology gets better

00:53:56.620 and you can operate a drone from anywhere through, let's say, you know, Starlink or something? So you

00:54:06.100 can sit on your couch in Maryland and operate a drone in Mexico, like a small one. Now that would

00:54:14.220 require somebody locally to launch it, but maybe you could control it from anywhere. Do you think that

00:54:22.820 people will be using drones to murder cartel operatives in Mexico while sitting on their couch

00:54:30.500 in America because nobody will know whose drone it was? Could you randomize the drones so that even

00:54:38.700 the people who launched them don't know exactly who's operating them? They might know the pool of

00:54:44.520 people who could operate them because maybe you signed up for something, but nobody would know because

00:54:49.060 it's an encrypted signal, let's say. Let's say nobody could know who was actually controlling

00:54:54.780 it. Do you think it's technically impossible to make it anonymous? Again, I'm not recommending

00:55:04.840 it. I'm predicting. The ones who say no, what would make it impossible? Because you've got

00:55:15.060 the signal that goes all the way from America to everywhere through Starlink, so you could

00:55:20.020 reach it through the internet, and you could weaponize it, and you could just have somebody

00:55:28.220 locally launch it. That's all possible. Yeah. So some of you say it's not possible. You know,

00:55:38.800 the people who say stuff like that is not possible end up being wrong, don't they? I usually bet on the

00:55:46.300 it is possible people. I don't know if it's possible, but it might be. Unfortunately, it would work both

00:55:52.160 ways, so the cartels would be using drones to attack America, but, you know, so that's bad.

00:55:58.180 Apparently, the GOP has gained among all minority groups, which means all they lost was white women.

00:56:11.440 That's it, right? They lost white women? They didn't lose white men, did they? I don't know.

00:56:19.820 Oh, women between a certain age. Let me ask you this. What is the most hated demographic group in America 1.00

00:56:32.040 right now? What is the most hated demographic group? Is it white men or white women?

00:56:40.040 I think it might be a toss-up. It's a bad time for white people. Somebody says, Johnny Guitar. He says, 0.93

00:56:53.720 the Jews. That's a joke. We are not anti-Semitic. As a callback to EA. Yeah, hated by whom? This is the

00:57:05.760 exact right question. I don't know. I feel like there's a lot of dislike going around.

00:57:14.180 But it might be white women who are the most disliked at the moment. They may have taken over 1.00

00:57:18.960 for white men who have ruled that category for years. How in the world does the left explain that

00:57:31.060 the left is supposed to be the diversity party? How do they explain that all the diverse people

00:57:39.320 are moving to the other party? Here's how I explain it. It's really obvious now that the

00:57:48.540 Democratic Party is the woman party. I've been saying it for a while, but it's pretty obvious 0.61

00:57:54.320 now, isn't it? Now, the first time I said it, maybe four years ago, five years ago, do you remember

00:58:01.860 those on Locals especially? Do you remember me saying that the Democrats are the woman party?

00:58:08.040 And I don't feel like I sold that, like nobody was agreeing with me when I said it.

00:58:13.520 What do you think today? After the midterms, it's clear that the women are in charge. 1.00

00:58:18.440 It's a woman party. It's a woman party. And if you're male and black, do you think they have 0.99

00:58:24.580 anything for you? At least if you become a Republican, you'll be respected. You can at least bank that.

00:58:36.940 Do you know what is the best success strategy for a black man in America? The number one best

00:58:44.580 guaranteed success formula for a black man in America? Identify as Republican. 0.52

00:58:51.640 Now, of course, that would have its own social backlash and stuff. But is there anything that

00:58:57.620 white Republicans like better than a black Republican who's doing it for the right reasons? 1.00

00:59:05.100 Like, he's not pretending. They love it because it makes them feel smart, right? When people join your

00:59:11.440 team, you feel like, ah, I guess I was on the right team. Look at that. I guess those diversity

00:59:17.660 people and Democrats were the wrong team. If they were the right team, things would be moving

00:59:23.380 the other way. But you're coming my way? I like that. And I don't think I've ever seen a black 0.99

00:59:30.720 Republican man to fail. I feel like they all succeed. Because, you know, they've got the right

00:59:40.040 strategy and there's nothing really stopping them. So that's what I'd do. Speaking of that,

00:59:51.260 so Instagram has become a cesspool of bad relationship advice. Like, really bad relationship advice. Some of

00:59:59.480 the worst stuff you'll ever see in your life that is distributed with great confidence. Now, here's

01:00:05.120 something I saw today. And I do not necessarily think this is true, right? I'm only reporting what

01:00:13.980 somebody on Instagram who got a lot of attention said. There's apparently some kind of app where a

01:00:22.200 woman can calculate her odds of finding the right man. Or it might be just a census app. So it might

01:00:29.500 not be for that purpose, but it could be used for that. But so there's a man on Instagram, I didn't

01:00:36.000 catch his name, and he was doing the calculation. He goes, all right, you're a woman in America,

01:00:41.120 right? And you're looking for a man, let's say, between 28 and 45, right? You're looking to get

01:00:46.540 serious. So you put in, all right, it's got to be a man, first sort. Got to be, you know, under 45.

01:00:54.780 I'll take any race, no restrictions, so I have the biggest possible pool. Well, I'm going to limit

01:01:01.640 the men who are under 5'9". This was the gentleman's example. He goes, yeah, you know, women like taller 0.96

01:01:08.700 men, so we'll eliminate it under 5'9". Then we'll also eliminate the obese, because, you know,

01:01:16.160 women are not looking for an obese guy, according to this guy. And you want, the women want somebody 0.96

01:01:21.000 who can make over 100K a year and is not married. So how many, what percentage, what are the odds

01:01:28.940 that you can find this guy? He's young, he's any race, he's tall, he's thin, he makes over 100 a year,

01:01:39.080 and he's still available. 5.6%. 5.6%. And there's a theme going on, there's a theme on Instagram,

01:01:51.900 anyway, of both women and men telling women that they set their standards too high. Have

01:02:00.300 you all seen that? It's like, it's just all over Instagram. Men and women saying the same

01:02:05.260 thing. Women, you're setting your standards way too high, and you don't have anything to 1.00

01:02:10.020 offer us. I mean, both the men and the women are saying that women don't have anything to

01:02:15.800 offer. What am I getting? I'm not getting loyalty, I'm not getting money, I'm not getting

01:02:20.640 protection, I'm having, I get some kids that get taken away from me. What's in it for me?

01:02:27.780 And it's hilarious to watch women try to answer the question. Ah. And then part of this theme 1.00

01:02:37.160 or not, I saw another video where an older couple were jokingly reading advice from the

01:02:46.220 50s on how to be a good wife. And the advice from the 50s was, you know, it was all this

01:02:51.720 old sexist stuff, you know, make sure you take off his shoes when he comes home, and don't

01:02:57.740 talk loud because he's had a tough day, and don't tell him any of your problems, he's got

01:03:02.600 enough, all this stuff. And the people reading it are sort of laughing like, you know, ha ha,

01:03:09.420 this would never work today, and all that. And I'm thinking to myself, okay, the specific

01:03:15.760 example is maybe not, you know, not taking the shoes off or something. But if both the

01:03:23.460 couples are not thinking, how can I make that other one happy, and actually putting in the

01:03:29.340 work every day to do it, it's not going to work. So I've got a feeling they were laughing

01:03:37.120 as something that worked. It had lots of, you know, problems of its own in that sexist

01:03:43.180 time. So it's not something I'd go back to, but I think they might be missing the, throwing

01:03:49.540 out the baby with the bathwater there. So I was curious, there was a story about what

01:03:55.600 celebrities lost money with this FTX thing. And one of them was Stephen Curry. I would love

01:04:03.820 to know how much. You know, anybody puts it in crypto, I don't know how much they had.

01:04:09.380 Yeah, I guess Tom Brady actually invested in the company itself. So we have learned that

01:04:19.300 people who are great athletes and actors are not so good at making investment decisions.

01:04:26.680 Now, I will take all of that back if it was, you know, 2% of their wealth or something. Because

01:04:33.460 putting 2% into some crypto thing, that's not crazy. That's not crazy. But if it was a lot

01:04:42.260 of money, they need some better advisors. A little bit better advisors. Question on Ukraine.

01:04:51.060 How is it possible that Russia taking out power plants as winter is approaching in Ukraine,

01:04:58.600 how is that not a war crime? Is it a war crime and we just know that we can't do anything about

01:05:06.160 it, so nobody's treating it that way? You know, why isn't The Hague or somebody saying

01:05:11.000 it's a war crime? No way? Power plants are military assets, but, you know, really? You know, if you're

01:05:24.320 taking out the power plant for Kiev, that's a military asset? It's a military asset if you're sending in 0.68

01:05:30.080 your ground troops. But if you're not sending in your ground troops to, you know, conquer it and then

01:05:35.920 turn the power back on, then it's just a war crime, isn't it? 0.85

01:05:41.940 We did it in Iraq, and I'm saying that it does make sense for an active invasion. 1.00

01:05:48.840 In an active invasion, yeah, anything that gives any, the military, any ability you take out.

01:05:55.900 But they're not really actively invading, you know, the bulk of Ukraine. I feel like that's

01:06:01.840 just got to be a war crime, right? NATO attacked civilians in the east, somebody says.

01:06:13.600 Russia.

01:06:17.660 Read the Che on, read Che on urban warfare.

01:06:24.380 Dual-use facilities, not necessarily a war crime.

01:06:27.340 Nah, really? The civilian power plant is dual-use? I mean, I get it. You know, there might be a base

01:06:36.980 there or something, but, I don't know. I feel the people who suffer would not be the military,

01:06:43.520 because the military could operate, you know, independent of a power plant, but civilians cannot.

01:06:49.080 No more of a war crime than something, well, I think if you're not aiming at military people,

01:07:01.680 it's just got to be a war crime.

01:07:06.020 All right, I don't know. We'll look into that.

01:07:10.420 What else is going on? That's about it.

01:07:13.060 Let me give a summary on Trump.

01:07:19.420 If his strategy

01:07:21.020 is to

01:07:23.540 act like the reasonable person,

01:07:26.560 it could work.

01:07:28.300 Because what we saw in Trump yesterday

01:07:30.320 was a low enough energy

01:07:32.180 that you could almost call it

01:07:34.020 the Biden-Biden

01:07:35.700 election strategy.

01:07:37.340 What is the one thing that would be

01:07:39.180 the worst thing for Trump

01:07:40.940 running for re-election?

01:07:43.060 What's the worst thing he could do?

01:07:46.360 Say something

01:07:47.480 outrageous.

01:07:49.300 Yeah.

01:07:49.600 Go bombastic.

01:07:52.780 Yeah. 0.98

01:07:53.540 Just go a little crazy and scare the women. 1.00

01:07:56.260 He literally scares women 0.98

01:07:57.900 and men who

01:07:59.440 are woman-like.

01:08:01.780 Not an insult.

01:08:04.260 Let me clarify that.

01:08:05.840 When I say he scares women 0.56

01:08:07.480 and men who are

01:08:08.860 woman-like, 0.64

01:08:11.040 I'm not anti-anything.

01:08:13.060 I'm just saying that

01:08:14.120 such people exist.

01:08:16.040 That's the whole point

01:08:16.920 of the LGBTQ

01:08:17.760 idea,

01:08:20.060 is that there are people

01:08:20.980 all over the spectrum.

01:08:22.780 So I'm just agreeing with that

01:08:24.000 there are people

01:08:24.520 all over the spectrum

01:08:25.380 and that the Democrats

01:08:27.320 seem to attract

01:08:28.340 the less dominant

01:08:30.560 type of males

01:08:31.960 on average.

01:08:33.320 that's just an observation.

01:08:37.380 I don't have any science

01:08:38.180 to back that up,

01:08:38.880 but it looks like it.

01:08:40.000 I mean,

01:08:40.240 to me it seems obvious.

01:08:42.480 So,

01:08:43.320 if Trump's biggest problem

01:08:44.980 is that he's actually

01:08:45.840 a scary character,

01:08:47.520 people who are confident

01:08:49.240 like it.

01:08:52.320 You know,

01:08:52.880 if you put me in a room

01:08:54.080 with a scary character,

01:08:55.820 I'm happy.

01:08:56.980 You know,

01:08:58.500 if he's on my side,

01:09:00.420 like,

01:09:00.800 hey,

01:09:00.980 scary character,

01:09:02.220 let's have lunch.

01:09:04.060 Because,

01:09:04.620 you know,

01:09:04.960 I'm a scary character

01:09:05.920 as well.

01:09:06.940 Let me say this about men.

01:09:08.840 I don't,

01:09:09.140 I'm just going to

01:09:09.620 throw this in here.

01:09:11.200 I've sometimes heard

01:09:12.440 that,

01:09:14.260 you know,

01:09:17.040 the larger the man,

01:09:18.440 the safer you're going

01:09:19.260 to be.

01:09:20.540 I don't know

01:09:21.320 that there's any science

01:09:22.200 to suggest that.

01:09:24.360 Because any man

01:09:25.440 can kill any other man.

01:09:28.400 That's the, 0.98

01:09:29.080 that's the beauty

01:09:29.880 of being male.

01:09:31.400 No matter who I meet,

01:09:33.720 and no matter how

01:09:34.480 threatening or dangerous

01:09:35.480 or big they are, 1.00

01:09:36.580 I know I can kill them. 1.00

01:09:38.760 I just have to run away, 1.00

01:09:40.900 get a gun, 0.90

01:09:41.600 find out where they live, 1.00

01:09:42.620 hunt them down.

01:09:43.600 Right.

01:09:44.120 But I could.

01:09:46.020 Now,

01:09:46.580 you know,

01:09:47.000 if they grabbed me 1.00

01:09:47.920 and killed me then, 1.00

01:09:48.820 well then, 0.98

01:09:49.500 no.

01:09:50.180 But that's pretty rare.

01:09:52.700 Right.

01:09:53.180 So the fact,

01:09:53.900 the fact is that any man

01:09:55.060 can kill any other man.

01:09:56.740 And we all know it.

01:09:58.240 We all know it.

01:09:59.680 Right.

01:10:00.180 So size matters

01:10:01.400 in limited situations.

01:10:03.220 Yeah,

01:10:03.460 if you were going to do,

01:10:04.640 you know,

01:10:05.280 like you're in the fight,

01:10:06.680 yeah,

01:10:06.940 size matters.

01:10:07.980 But there aren't

01:10:08.700 that many fights

01:10:09.460 where that sort of,

01:10:10.700 I've never been

01:10:11.280 in that situation.

01:10:12.580 Have you?

01:10:13.740 How many of you

01:10:14.600 have ever been

01:10:15.160 in a situation

01:10:15.900 where

01:10:17.920 where your size

01:10:21.180 mattered?

01:10:22.680 Let's say for males,

01:10:24.860 just just males,

01:10:26.000 men.

01:10:26.740 Have you ever been

01:10:27.340 in a situation

01:10:27.920 that was like,

01:10:28.540 you know,

01:10:28.700 dangerous,

01:10:29.540 but your size mattered?

01:10:31.720 Some say,

01:10:32.440 some say yes.

01:10:33.660 I think it matters

01:10:34.580 if you can intimidate

01:10:35.760 people out of fighting.

01:10:37.960 You can certainly

01:10:38.760 break up a fight

01:10:39.580 easier if you're bigger.

01:10:41.240 That's something.

01:10:42.560 But,

01:10:42.860 but let me put it

01:10:43.480 this way.

01:10:44.260 If I had to

01:10:45.140 protect

01:10:45.780 a woman,

01:10:48.240 do you think

01:10:48.680 somebody could

01:10:49.180 get past me?

01:10:53.280 Not without

01:10:53.940 getting seriously

01:10:54.820 hurt.

01:10:55.940 Like,

01:10:56.240 yeah,

01:10:56.380 a big guy 1.00

01:10:56.920 could kill me, 1.00

01:10:58.120 but they would 1.00

01:10:59.200 never be the same.

01:11:00.920 Right?

01:11:01.200 You wouldn't

01:11:02.120 walk away

01:11:03.060 from that

01:11:03.480 the same.

01:11:05.160 And if I

01:11:05.720 recovered,

01:11:07.140 I'm coming

01:11:08.260 for you.

01:11:09.820 Right?

01:11:10.240 It doesn't matter

01:11:10.980 how long it

01:11:11.480 takes.

01:11:12.120 If I recover,

01:11:13.160 I'm coming

01:11:13.480 for you.

01:11:14.460 So that's,

01:11:15.000 that's like the

01:11:15.540 promise all men

01:11:16.220 make to each

01:11:16.740 other.

01:11:17.260 If you do

01:11:17.920 something to me,

01:11:18.780 I am coming

01:11:19.340 for you.

01:11:21.320 So that does

01:11:22.120 keep civilization

01:11:22.980 a little bit

01:11:23.740 together.

01:11:24.760 So if Trump

01:11:25.740 is trying to be

01:11:26.340 less scary

01:11:27.040 and less

01:11:29.180 provocative,

01:11:30.740 I buy it.

01:11:32.060 If he decided

01:11:32.980 to put all of

01:11:33.740 his provocation

01:11:34.600 on fentanyl,

01:11:36.380 he's got a

01:11:36.860 really strong

01:11:37.340 package.

01:11:40.980 I hate

01:11:43.260 to say it,

01:11:44.680 but he's

01:11:45.140 getting closer

01:11:45.960 to making

01:11:47.160 me a supporter.

01:11:48.060 I'm definitely

01:11:48.440 not.

01:11:49.580 I'm not on

01:11:50.440 board with

01:11:51.540 him or anyone

01:11:52.300 else.

01:11:52.620 I need a

01:11:52.980 fentanyl plan.

01:11:54.080 I'm a single

01:11:54.740 issue voter.

01:11:55.840 I'm not going

01:11:56.580 to change.

01:11:58.040 So he's the

01:11:58.980 one who's

01:11:59.280 talked the

01:11:59.680 toughness,

01:12:00.200 but I'd need

01:12:00.620 a lot more

01:12:01.020 details on that.

01:12:02.040 Like, what does

01:12:02.480 it mean to go

01:12:03.020 to war with

01:12:03.460 the cartel?

01:12:04.620 If that doesn't

01:12:05.600 mean bomb the 0.99

01:12:06.320 shit out of 1.00

01:12:06.820 them, then it 0.99

01:12:07.260 doesn't mean

01:12:07.580 anything.

01:12:08.920 Do you agree?

01:12:09.660 Like, I need

01:12:11.380 to say he's 0.89

01:12:11.900 going to bomb 0.99

01:12:12.400 them, and 1.00

01:12:13.800 then I'm on

01:12:14.440 board.

01:12:17.480 Maybe.

01:12:19.800 So I don't

01:12:20.800 think he offered

01:12:21.380 much new except

01:12:22.160 the fentanyl

01:12:23.000 and the Mars

01:12:23.620 thing is more

01:12:24.440 of a Musk

01:12:25.100 thing than a

01:12:25.800 Trump thing,

01:12:27.540 so I'm not

01:12:28.040 sure that helped

01:12:28.580 anything.

01:12:29.560 But I would

01:12:30.760 like to see

01:12:31.260 him have a

01:12:34.640 little bit more

01:12:35.140 meat on the

01:12:35.720 bones.

01:12:36.520 Part of the

01:12:37.020 problem is that

01:12:37.660 you know exactly

01:12:38.500 what he is.

01:12:40.660 We'll talk

01:12:41.260 about Pence.

01:12:42.220 We know exactly

01:12:43.540 what Trump

01:12:44.160 will give you.

01:12:45.480 You don't have

01:12:45.980 to wonder if

01:12:46.780 he likes low

01:12:47.400 taxes.

01:12:48.100 You don't have

01:12:48.440 to wonder how

01:12:50.340 he would deal

01:12:50.820 with other

01:12:51.200 countries.

01:12:51.820 We know.

01:12:52.820 We know.

01:12:53.840 So he does

01:12:55.080 need to add

01:12:55.640 something that

01:12:56.160 people can talk

01:12:56.880 about, like a

01:12:57.540 new thing that

01:12:58.080 we can talk

01:12:58.620 about.

01:12:59.280 But you kind

01:13:00.020 of know what

01:13:00.420 you're going

01:13:00.660 to get.

01:13:01.060 I haven't

01:13:11.300 seen Jason

01:13:11.900 Whitlock's

01:13:12.540 take on that

01:13:13.060 now.

01:13:14.040 All right,

01:13:14.380 Pence.

01:13:15.100 Apparently

01:13:15.440 Pence is

01:13:16.400 running.

01:13:18.660 Is that a

01:13:20.000 problem?

01:13:22.460 I mean, it's

01:13:23.860 only a problem

01:13:24.560 in the primaries,

01:13:25.340 but I can't

01:13:26.660 see Pence

01:13:27.220 draining off

01:13:28.020 enough support

01:13:28.720 to pull

01:13:29.860 ahead of

01:13:30.180 Trump.

01:13:31.000 What he might

01:13:31.900 do, here's

01:13:33.200 what I could

01:13:33.700 imagine.

01:13:34.900 I can imagine

01:13:35.940 four Republicans

01:13:37.800 getting in in

01:13:38.840 addition to

01:13:39.380 Trump, and

01:13:40.700 everybody gets

01:13:41.740 drawn down to

01:13:42.440 20% support.

01:13:43.480 I can see

01:13:46.400 that, and

01:13:47.520 then it's

01:13:48.000 anybody's

01:13:49.420 bet.

01:13:50.680 Because there

01:13:51.140 might be some

01:13:51.600 people who

01:13:51.980 say, I love

01:13:52.800 Trump, but

01:13:53.320 Pompeo is at

01:13:54.560 least a little

01:13:55.800 more stable,

01:13:57.220 you might say.

01:13:58.040 Or I love

01:13:58.540 Trump, but

01:13:59.080 Pence did a

01:14:00.820 good job.

01:14:01.360 I feel like,

01:14:03.700 yeah, no.

01:14:05.140 Forget it.

01:14:06.460 Now, there are

01:14:07.860 no Republicans

01:14:08.520 that could take

01:14:09.280 Trump below

01:14:09.820 the winning

01:14:10.560 number for

01:14:11.080 the primary.

01:14:12.420 You don't

01:14:13.020 think so,

01:14:13.400 do you?

01:14:14.180 I don't see

01:14:14.840 any way he

01:14:15.920 loses the

01:14:16.380 primary.

01:14:17.500 Do you?

01:14:19.640 Yeah.

01:14:22.140 I just saw

01:14:23.100 a prompt on

01:14:23.680 there.

01:14:24.860 Elon Musk

01:14:25.580 tweeted that

01:14:27.120 he is the

01:14:27.540 taint, because

01:14:29.800 he was standing

01:14:30.340 between the

01:14:31.420 two pranksters.

01:14:33.420 So he

01:14:34.180 referred to

01:14:34.660 them as being,

01:14:35.540 between the

01:14:36.040 two of them

01:14:36.420 as being the

01:14:36.920 taint.

01:14:38.560 He really

01:14:39.300 doesn't need a

01:14:39.880 marketing department

01:14:40.640 at all.

01:14:42.300 At all.

01:14:43.020 All right.

01:14:47.680 Let me get

01:14:48.340 your opinion.

01:14:49.460 Give me your

01:14:50.060 opinion on

01:14:50.840 the Trump

01:14:52.560 announcement

01:14:53.480 speech, just

01:14:54.360 the speech

01:14:54.720 itself.

01:14:55.800 So give me a

01:14:56.600 quality of the

01:14:57.800 speech ranking,

01:14:59.400 and do it with

01:15:00.000 just a few

01:15:00.500 words.

01:15:01.740 What would be

01:15:02.500 the few words

01:15:03.480 that would

01:15:04.720 describe,

01:15:06.040 somebody says

01:15:06.600 10 out of

01:15:07.080 10?

01:15:08.960 Some say

01:15:09.720 lost his

01:15:10.320 edge.

01:15:11.260 Meh.

01:15:12.260 Nine,

01:15:12.940 rambling,

01:15:13.780 A plus,

01:15:14.360 A plus.

01:15:15.460 Yeah.

01:15:15.920 Didn't watch,

01:15:16.680 effective,

01:15:17.440 7 out of

01:15:17.940 10.

01:15:19.020 So once

01:15:20.220 again, the

01:15:20.780 human Rorschach

01:15:21.760 test does

01:15:22.740 his thing.

01:15:24.000 Trump does

01:15:24.580 something in

01:15:25.120 front of

01:15:25.460 everybody,

01:15:26.680 and we can't

01:15:27.180 decide if it

01:15:27.860 was a huge

01:15:28.360 failure or the

01:15:29.160 best he's ever

01:15:29.720 done.

01:15:29.980 Trump, just

01:15:31.600 like normal.

01:15:33.540 So our two

01:15:34.580 worlds just

01:15:35.380 bifurcate

01:15:36.220 instantly as

01:15:37.440 soon as

01:15:37.740 Trump is the

01:15:38.280 topic, and

01:15:39.380 that retreat to

01:15:40.180 your bubble,

01:15:41.320 it was either

01:15:41.780 the best thing

01:15:42.540 that everybody

01:15:43.020 did, or it

01:15:44.480 was a big

01:15:45.620 old mess from

01:15:46.460 a twice

01:15:47.680 impeached

01:15:48.220 insurrectionist.

01:15:51.120 Yeah.

01:15:52.020 So here we

01:15:52.940 go.

01:15:53.780 Here we

01:15:54.240 go.

01:15:54.520 Here we go.

01:15:56.340 All right.

01:15:58.460 Uh.

01:15:59.980 His dress

01:16:02.700 was golden

01:16:03.220 white, yeah.

01:16:04.900 It was too

01:16:05.520 long, maybe

01:16:06.660 so.

01:16:10.380 Uh, you

01:16:10.940 notice he

01:16:11.420 flubbed a

01:16:11.940 lot of words.

01:16:12.700 See, I think

01:16:13.280 that might have

01:16:13.760 had to do

01:16:14.220 with he

01:16:14.920 couldn't read

01:16:15.520 the teleprompter

01:16:16.460 for one reason

01:16:17.700 or another.

01:16:18.320 I think the

01:16:18.960 teleprompter

01:16:19.540 people have

01:16:20.000 some explaining

01:16:20.660 to do.

01:16:21.780 Don't you?

01:16:22.880 I just feel

01:16:23.400 like it wasn't

01:16:23.860 big enough or

01:16:24.620 close enough or

01:16:25.360 something.

01:16:26.800 Oh, you

01:16:27.040 think he

01:16:27.320 slurred?

01:16:28.300 See, that,

01:16:29.240 I think he

01:16:29.780 was exhausted.

01:16:31.540 I think he

01:16:32.260 was emotionally

01:16:33.140 and physically

01:16:33.980 exhausted.

01:16:36.620 In an

01:16:37.320 unusual way.

01:16:38.220 Because I

01:16:38.580 think he

01:16:38.860 gets energized

01:16:39.500 by, you

01:16:40.740 know, working

01:16:41.200 and campaigning.

01:16:42.900 But he

01:16:43.460 probably had a

01:16:44.140 really tough

01:16:44.780 time with

01:16:45.340 his closest

01:16:46.120 family and

01:16:47.460 friends for

01:16:48.900 the past

01:16:49.240 week.

01:16:49.940 I think

01:16:50.460 Trump probably

01:16:51.020 got the 1.00

01:16:51.400 shit beat 1.00

01:16:51.800 out of him 1.00

01:16:52.180 by everybody

01:16:52.860 and then

01:16:54.060 decided to

01:16:54.780 do it anyway.

01:16:56.040 Because that's

01:16:56.840 Trump.

01:16:57.100 now, let

01:17:00.940 me ask you

01:17:01.260 this.

01:17:02.280 Do you

01:17:02.520 think so

01:17:03.040 far, let's

01:17:03.880 just look at

01:17:05.140 the announcement.

01:17:06.580 Do you

01:17:06.880 think that

01:17:07.280 Trump made

01:17:07.820 it all about

01:17:08.360 Trump or

01:17:09.640 did he make

01:17:10.580 it about the

01:17:11.000 country?

01:17:12.240 Did he make

01:17:13.000 it all about

01:17:13.520 Trump or

01:17:14.320 did he focus

01:17:16.420 on the

01:17:16.680 country?

01:17:20.180 A little bit

01:17:20.920 of both.

01:17:21.820 A little bit

01:17:22.280 of both.

01:17:22.620 Yeah, I

01:17:23.600 think he

01:17:24.680 focused a

01:17:25.740 little bit

01:17:25.980 more on

01:17:26.240 the country

01:17:26.640 and that

01:17:27.020 felt right.

01:17:30.380 All right.

01:17:34.860 If Trump

01:17:35.700 solidifies his

01:17:37.720 fentanyl

01:17:38.180 message, I

01:17:40.460 think he

01:17:40.820 wins.

01:17:42.700 I think he

01:17:43.520 wins.

01:17:44.680 Without the

01:17:45.480 fentanyl

01:17:45.920 message being

01:17:46.720 first rate,

01:17:49.100 it would be

01:17:50.180 a little

01:17:50.380 tougher.

01:17:50.700 Some say

01:17:52.380 Trump's the

01:17:54.720 only Republican

01:17:55.480 who can't

01:17:56.580 win the

01:17:56.900 general, but

01:17:59.000 Trump plus

01:17:59.640 a fentanyl

01:18:00.280 plan, it's

01:18:01.980 all over.

01:18:03.860 If Trump

01:18:04.800 brings a

01:18:05.260 real fentanyl

01:18:06.040 plan and

01:18:07.500 he just says

01:18:08.060 all the other

01:18:08.620 stuff is just

01:18:09.260 what you think

01:18:09.700 it'll be,

01:18:10.580 it's exactly

01:18:11.100 what you

01:18:11.440 think.

01:18:12.620 You know

01:18:13.440 me.

01:18:14.100 You know

01:18:14.540 what I'm

01:18:14.860 going to do.

01:18:15.960 It's exactly

01:18:16.580 what you think.

01:18:17.240 That's what

01:18:17.560 you're going

01:18:17.820 to get.

01:18:18.800 Energy is

01:18:19.500 going to be

01:18:19.840 unleashed.

01:18:20.940 Regulations

01:18:21.380 will be

01:18:21.800 decreased.

01:18:22.940 I'll talk

01:18:24.640 to all the

01:18:25.100 dictators even

01:18:25.960 if you think

01:18:26.420 I shouldn't.

01:18:27.240 Know exactly

01:18:27.860 what you're

01:18:28.220 getting.

01:18:29.460 But also,

01:18:30.880 you can

01:18:31.220 imagine him

01:18:31.700 saying, I'm

01:18:32.780 going to

01:18:33.000 treat the

01:18:33.400 biggest problem

01:18:33.960 in the

01:18:34.240 country like

01:18:34.860 it's the

01:18:35.240 biggest problem

01:18:35.840 in the

01:18:36.080 country.

01:18:38.480 If he

01:18:39.040 said that,

01:18:40.860 I don't

01:18:41.840 know how

01:18:42.200 he could

01:18:42.480 lose.

01:18:44.080 I don't

01:18:44.420 know how

01:18:44.760 he could

01:18:45.020 lose.

01:18:46.000 Now, he'd

01:18:46.420 also have to

01:18:46.980 not say

01:18:47.680 provocative

01:18:48.800 things that

01:18:49.340 could be

01:18:49.560 taken out

01:18:49.980 of context.

01:18:51.360 But there's

01:18:52.660 always a way

01:18:53.040 you could

01:18:53.260 lose, so

01:18:54.380 you never

01:18:54.600 know.

01:18:55.100 All right,

01:18:55.480 that's all

01:18:56.080 for you,

01:18:57.160 YouTube.

01:18:58.160 Thanks for

01:18:58.600 joining.

01:19:00.140 I'll talk

01:19:01.080 to you tomorrow.

01:19:01.920 and see you tomorrow

01:19:03.360 at the beach.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 16, 2022

Episode 1929 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About Trump's Announcement, War With The Cartels And More

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript