Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1939 Scott Adams： Is The Democrat Party Basically An Ex-Wife？ Hearing A Voice In Your Head

00:00:00.720 To find me.

00:00:03.580 Yep, we have zero.

00:00:05.980 Yay, one person watching on YouTube.

00:00:09.120 That's all I need.

00:00:10.760 I only need one person.

00:00:12.580 That's all.

00:00:14.340 Oh, we got five.

00:00:15.580 All right.

00:00:16.380 They're finding us.

00:00:18.940 Well, those YouTube people,

00:00:21.040 they're resourceful.

00:00:23.700 You're so resourceful.

00:00:25.660 Yeah, they're streaming back in.

00:00:30.000 One of them is yay, you think?

00:00:35.000 If I were yay, I would be watching this today.

00:00:40.740 All right, look at you.

00:00:43.140 They're almost back in.

00:00:44.780 So I'm going to talk about a few things here

00:00:47.460 while they're coming back in.

00:00:48.580 I saw a...

00:00:49.960 I've heard this story before,

00:00:51.600 but I want to see how many of you

00:00:53.820 fit into this category.

00:00:56.960 Did you know that not everybody has

00:00:58.820 a voice in their head

00:01:00.820 that's themselves having a conversation

00:01:02.900 with yourself?

00:01:05.380 Apparently, something like half

00:01:06.900 or 75% of the public

00:01:08.480 doesn't have a voice in their head.

00:01:12.200 So I need to ask you,

00:01:14.780 how many of you

00:01:16.980 hear a voice in your head all the time?

00:01:20.880 I mean, I do.

00:01:21.460 I continually have an actual conversation

00:01:24.680 going in my head.

00:01:26.360 But how many people don't?

00:01:28.760 Why am I only saying yes, I do?

00:01:31.320 I've seen very few no's.

00:01:34.200 So that doesn't make sense, does it?

00:01:36.020 I feel like everybody would say yes

00:01:37.600 to that question.

00:01:39.100 But yet the research acts like

00:01:41.100 it's mostly no or half of them no.

00:01:45.860 Yeah.

00:01:46.580 Maybe we should just call bullshit on that.

00:01:48.400 I'm not sure that's even true, is it?

00:01:51.800 Because I don't know how you'd not

00:01:53.020 have a voice in your head.

00:01:56.780 Now, I do know that it is a thing.

00:01:59.720 So let me be clear.

00:02:03.340 I'm pretty sure it's a real thing

00:02:04.940 that some people don't hear a voice.

00:02:06.800 But what I don't believe

00:02:08.540 is that it's common.

00:02:12.900 Yeah.

00:02:13.260 I don't believe it's common.

00:02:16.340 By the way, if anybody's watching

00:02:17.760 on Locals because the YouTube feed died,

00:02:25.280 YouTube is back up.

00:02:27.460 I just had to fire up a separate feed.

00:02:30.040 So it's working now.

00:02:31.400 There was just something wrong

00:02:32.180 with it initially.

00:02:33.560 So you can see it on either one.

00:02:34.920 And I always appreciate

00:02:39.140 that you come here.

00:02:39.820 All right.

00:02:41.440 There are over 600 people

00:02:42.980 waiting on the old link.

00:02:45.400 What am I going to do about that?

00:02:49.260 There's nothing I can do about that, right?

00:02:51.480 I can't kill the old link

00:02:52.800 because I've got a new one

00:02:54.460 that's running.

00:02:56.720 And it wasn't responsive

00:02:58.280 when I clicked on it.

00:02:59.360 All right, well.

00:03:00.380 I guess I'll have to find it later.

00:03:01.640 I think they'll figure out

00:03:03.780 in five minutes

00:03:05.300 that that's not working.

00:03:10.120 I can't give you a redo on the sip

00:03:12.100 because that would be

00:03:12.860 traveling back in time.

00:03:14.380 But I'll give you an interim sip.

00:03:19.660 All right.

00:03:21.980 So I'm going to call bullshit

00:03:23.280 on this whole half of the people

00:03:25.100 can't hear an internal voice

00:03:26.500 in their head.

00:03:27.620 I don't think that's a thing.

00:03:29.380 Now, let me tell you about

00:03:30.400 a story that's in

00:03:34.060 the Wall Street Journal.

00:03:34.940 Not a story.

00:03:35.680 A opinion piece.

00:03:37.800 It was written by

00:03:38.860 a Roland Fryer

00:03:41.600 who's a professor of economics

00:03:43.860 at Harvard.

00:03:45.260 So the two things

00:03:46.320 you need to know about him

00:03:47.240 is he's a professor

00:03:49.040 of economics at Harvard.

00:03:51.620 Then the second thing

00:03:52.660 you need to know about him

00:03:53.600 because it's the context

00:03:55.260 of the story

00:03:55.760 is he had a black grandmother.

00:03:58.080 Now, I don't know

00:04:00.120 if his parents were black,

00:04:01.740 but he seems to be identifying

00:04:03.560 with the black experience

00:04:06.980 at least somewhat.

00:04:09.140 And in his article,

00:04:10.300 he talks about studying

00:04:11.500 for economics,

00:04:13.300 obviously at a top-level education

00:04:15.820 because he was at Harvard.

00:04:17.020 And he was doing research

00:04:20.300 to find out

00:04:20.960 how much discrimination

00:04:22.020 and bigotry

00:04:23.400 was behind the differences

00:04:25.280 in salaries.

00:04:27.900 And what do you think

00:04:28.720 he found out

00:04:29.420 when he kept looking

00:04:30.680 for the reason

00:04:31.540 that there's a difference

00:04:32.480 in salaries?

00:04:34.600 It was completely explained

00:04:36.360 by skill level.

00:04:40.240 Apparently,

00:04:40.840 the free market

00:04:41.560 did exactly

00:04:42.780 what you expected.

00:04:43.700 And there was no indication

00:04:46.860 of any racism whatsoever.

00:04:49.160 The people who had

00:04:49.800 the same skills

00:04:50.780 had the same pay.

00:04:54.080 Period.

00:04:55.600 And his article,

00:04:57.700 to his credit,

00:04:59.480 his article was about

00:05:00.860 how he was blinded

00:05:02.720 by confirmation bias

00:05:04.100 and that he couldn't even

00:05:05.840 see his own numbers.

00:05:07.460 Like, he was looking

00:05:08.120 at his own data

00:05:08.980 and he was not believing it

00:05:10.440 because his grandmother

00:05:11.660 had primed him

00:05:12.480 that this racism

00:05:13.420 is everywhere

00:05:14.300 all the time.

00:05:15.960 He gave the story

00:05:17.100 of his grandmother

00:05:19.060 once,

00:05:20.660 there was some cashier

00:05:21.860 who handed her their money

00:05:23.340 without wanting

00:05:24.120 to touch her.

00:05:25.980 And the grandmother

00:05:27.540 interpreted that

00:05:28.420 as the cashier

00:05:29.800 was such a racist

00:05:30.840 she didn't want

00:05:32.080 to have accidental

00:05:32.840 contact with a black person.

00:05:35.140 That was how

00:05:35.560 the grandmother

00:05:36.080 interpreted it.

00:05:37.700 And then the grandson

00:05:39.260 wasn't so sure.

00:05:41.760 He was like,

00:05:42.480 I think maybe

00:05:43.280 she had a cold

00:05:44.000 and she didn't want

00:05:44.700 to give you her germs.

00:05:47.480 So basically

00:05:48.400 they had two

00:05:49.020 completely different worlds

00:05:50.300 based on, you know,

00:05:52.080 what you were primed

00:05:52.980 to believe.

00:05:53.920 So even with that

00:05:54.800 little bit of priming,

00:05:56.700 Mr. Fryer

00:05:58.440 got all the way

00:06:00.000 to, you know,

00:06:01.860 to adulthood

00:06:02.680 and he still

00:06:04.060 thought that the data

00:06:05.940 would agree with,

00:06:07.720 you know,

00:06:07.980 his interpretation

00:06:08.860 of the world

00:06:09.500 and it didn't.

00:06:11.080 Now here's

00:06:11.640 the important part

00:06:12.520 of the story.

00:06:13.780 Most of you

00:06:14.420 knew that, right?

00:06:16.580 Is there anybody

00:06:17.300 who didn't know

00:06:18.140 that the free market

00:06:19.720 does make salaries

00:06:21.020 basically equal?

00:06:22.940 I knew it.

00:06:24.460 I think every one

00:06:25.520 of you knew it.

00:06:26.520 Here's what's interesting.

00:06:29.360 Somebody who identifies

00:06:30.480 as black,

00:06:32.960 I believe.

00:06:33.700 I don't want

00:06:34.320 to over-characterize him

00:06:35.520 but that seems

00:06:36.300 how he presented himself.

00:06:40.320 He's got a major

00:06:41.380 opinion piece

00:06:42.180 in the Wall Street Journal.

00:06:44.180 He's got an economics

00:06:46.060 degree from Harvard.

00:06:48.600 I'm sorry.

00:06:49.800 Duh.

00:06:50.580 I am completely,

00:06:51.860 I mischaracterized him.

00:06:53.560 He was a professor

00:06:54.380 of economics at Harvard.

00:06:56.560 That's better

00:06:57.360 than having

00:06:57.880 an economics degree

00:06:59.180 at Harvard.

00:07:00.640 I don't know

00:07:01.380 where he got

00:07:01.840 his degree

00:07:02.360 but if he's

00:07:04.240 a professor

00:07:04.820 of economics

00:07:05.620 at Harvard

00:07:06.160 that's even

00:07:07.500 higher than being

00:07:08.480 a student

00:07:09.320 of economics.

00:07:11.100 So this is

00:07:12.020 somebody who

00:07:12.420 seriously knows

00:07:13.140 what he's talking

00:07:13.720 about.

00:07:15.160 And he got

00:07:16.100 this opinion piece

00:07:17.500 in the Wall Street Journal

00:07:18.520 one of the big

00:07:20.280 papers of record

00:07:21.180 and it looks

00:07:23.440 like just a good

00:07:24.200 opinion.

00:07:25.420 Like I don't

00:07:26.080 think anybody's

00:07:26.800 going to attack him.

00:07:27.920 I don't think

00:07:28.440 the newspaper

00:07:29.000 will be forced

00:07:30.520 to retract it.

00:07:32.260 I feel like

00:07:33.120 society has

00:07:34.480 reached the point

00:07:35.420 where this opinion

00:07:37.060 is now acceptable.

00:07:38.920 What do you think?

00:07:41.800 Because it now

00:07:42.880 agrees with

00:07:44.160 observation.

00:07:46.340 The data

00:07:47.160 and the observation

00:07:47.880 are now aligned

00:07:48.780 for at least

00:07:50.040 some of the people

00:07:50.720 in the world.

00:07:52.080 To me

00:07:52.420 this data

00:07:53.060 exactly matches

00:07:54.440 everything I've

00:07:55.360 observed.

00:07:56.980 To me

00:07:57.440 I've never

00:07:57.820 observed

00:07:59.380 directly

00:08:00.120 any salary

00:08:01.540 difference

00:08:02.080 for people

00:08:03.240 who have

00:08:03.440 similar skills.

00:08:05.880 Male,

00:08:06.320 female,

00:08:07.520 black,

00:08:07.920 white.

00:08:08.160 I've just

00:08:08.380 never seen it.

00:08:10.800 So maybe

00:08:11.640 the world

00:08:12.520 is getting

00:08:13.260 past that.

00:08:14.120 I will say

00:08:14.780 however

00:08:15.140 that this

00:08:16.960 doesn't help

00:08:17.720 with the real

00:08:18.940 source of

00:08:19.920 racial inequality

00:08:22.080 which is

00:08:22.780 the schools

00:08:23.700 because by

00:08:24.860 the time

00:08:25.180 you're an

00:08:25.500 adult

00:08:25.860 all the

00:08:26.880 damage

00:08:27.200 is done

00:08:27.660 isn't it?

00:08:28.920 If you've

00:08:29.540 got a bad

00:08:30.040 lower education

00:08:30.980 you don't

00:08:31.540 have the

00:08:31.900 choice

00:08:32.300 of having

00:08:33.260 equal skills

00:08:34.060 and equal

00:08:34.460 pay.

00:08:34.840 It's just

00:08:35.040 not an

00:08:35.380 option

00:08:35.620 because you

00:08:36.440 didn't get

00:08:36.840 the same

00:08:37.680 boost

00:08:38.900 when you

00:08:39.240 were a

00:08:39.420 kid.

00:08:40.340 So we

00:08:40.920 still have

00:08:41.200 to fix

00:08:41.500 that.

00:08:43.420 I'll bet

00:08:44.080 Mr.

00:08:45.020 Fryer would

00:08:45.560 agree with

00:08:46.100 that.

00:08:48.360 Here's some

00:08:48.980 good news.

00:08:49.600 the federal

00:08:50.180 FCC is

00:08:52.080 going to

00:08:52.340 ban new

00:08:53.020 telecom and

00:08:53.680 surveillance

00:08:54.060 equipment made

00:08:54.720 by Chinese

00:08:55.380 companies.

00:08:56.740 So they

00:08:57.120 don't want

00:08:57.480 to have

00:08:57.940 Chinese

00:08:58.940 surveillance

00:08:59.600 cameras in

00:09:01.100 American

00:09:01.620 places because

00:09:03.460 they're worried

00:09:03.900 that the

00:09:04.500 Chinese will

00:09:05.480 maybe possibly

00:09:07.220 use those

00:09:08.420 cameras to

00:09:09.540 spy on

00:09:10.640 Americans or

00:09:11.280 something.

00:09:13.040 Is there

00:09:13.580 anything missing

00:09:14.420 in this

00:09:14.900 story?

00:09:16.200 Something maybe

00:09:17.000 they overlooked

00:09:17.840 a little bit

00:09:18.680 maybe some

00:09:20.280 related kind

00:09:21.080 of story?

00:09:23.700 Well,

00:09:23.980 number one,

00:09:25.580 you know,

00:09:25.960 Trump tried to

00:09:26.620 do this and

00:09:27.280 got some

00:09:27.920 resistance.

00:09:29.060 But number

00:09:29.480 two,

00:09:31.940 TikTok is

00:09:33.300 like a

00:09:34.840 gazillion

00:09:35.400 cameras that

00:09:36.360 are literally

00:09:36.880 in citizens'

00:09:38.360 pockets.

00:09:40.780 How do you

00:09:41.660 say these

00:09:42.080 other companies

00:09:42.820 are the

00:09:43.280 risk and

00:09:43.860 not TikTok?

00:09:45.360 TikTok

00:09:45.680 literally has

00:09:46.440 a camera in

00:09:47.120 every phone.

00:09:47.760 looking at

00:09:49.120 you and

00:09:49.360 listening to

00:09:49.940 you and

00:09:50.280 making

00:09:50.480 decisions and

00:09:51.320 influencing

00:09:51.740 you.

00:09:52.460 This isn't

00:09:52.940 even close.

00:09:54.680 The fact

00:09:55.120 that we can

00:09:55.620 ban these

00:09:56.320 companies I've

00:09:58.020 never even

00:09:58.400 heard of,

00:09:59.080 and it's a

00:09:59.480 good idea,

00:10:00.500 I'm solidly

00:10:01.860 in favor of

00:10:02.440 banning them,

00:10:03.640 but TikTok's,

00:10:06.320 that's okay.

00:10:08.380 It's just,

00:10:09.100 it's absurd.

00:10:10.080 It's absurd.

00:10:11.620 But good

00:10:12.280 job, I would

00:10:12.880 say, from

00:10:13.420 all the

00:10:13.800 way back

00:10:14.240 to the

00:10:17.400 Trump

00:10:18.080 administration,

00:10:20.020 and I'll

00:10:20.500 give the

00:10:21.300 Biden

00:10:21.500 administration

00:10:22.080 credit for

00:10:23.000 finishing the

00:10:23.720 job and

00:10:24.720 blocking these

00:10:26.220 companies.

00:10:27.060 But it's

00:10:27.500 time to do

00:10:28.060 TikTok,

00:10:28.960 people.

00:10:29.200 Well,

00:10:29.300 I'm seeing,

00:10:37.280 apparently,

00:10:37.700 somebody asked

00:10:39.020 Musk, if

00:10:41.640 Twitter gets

00:10:43.100 banned on

00:10:44.020 the Apple

00:10:45.420 and Google

00:10:46.120 app stores,

00:10:48.200 would he

00:10:48.620 build his

00:10:49.060 own phone?

00:10:50.280 And he

00:10:50.480 said yes.

00:10:52.260 That's the

00:10:52.880 sort of

00:10:53.340 threat slash

00:10:55.820 bluff that

00:10:57.020 only Elon

00:10:58.020 Musk can

00:10:58.540 make.

00:10:59.860 Try to

00:11:00.300 think of

00:11:00.620 one other

00:11:01.120 person in

00:11:01.620 the world

00:11:02.020 who could

00:11:03.080 tell you

00:11:03.640 that if

00:11:04.300 things don't

00:11:04.760 work out,

00:11:05.200 he'll make

00:11:05.600 his own

00:11:05.920 smartphone,

00:11:06.920 and you

00:11:07.400 would believe

00:11:07.880 it.

00:11:09.360 Jeff Bezos

00:11:10.320 tried it.

00:11:11.280 That didn't

00:11:11.680 work out.

00:11:12.840 But do you

00:11:13.280 believe that

00:11:13.720 Jeff Bezos

00:11:14.380 could make

00:11:15.640 a real

00:11:16.620 competitive

00:11:17.060 phone?

00:11:18.300 Well, I

00:11:19.340 don't know.

00:11:19.640 He's very

00:11:20.100 capable.

00:11:21.760 But wouldn't

00:11:22.400 you trust

00:11:22.920 Elon Musk

00:11:23.500 to make a

00:11:24.360 smartphone in

00:11:25.600 a way you

00:11:26.020 wouldn't

00:11:26.260 necessarily

00:11:26.740 trust anybody

00:11:27.680 else?

00:11:29.580 Am I

00:11:30.200 wrong?

00:11:30.840 I can't

00:11:31.340 think of

00:11:31.620 anybody who

00:11:32.040 would be

00:11:32.260 more ideally

00:11:33.160 suited for

00:11:35.100 making a

00:11:35.640 smartphone.

00:11:36.500 Because he

00:11:37.180 could pair

00:11:37.560 it with

00:11:37.860 Neuralink,

00:11:38.640 and he

00:11:38.820 could pair

00:11:39.400 it with

00:11:39.660 his cars,

00:11:40.440 and he

00:11:40.600 could pair

00:11:41.080 it with

00:11:41.460 his satellites.

00:11:45.620 And here's

00:11:47.440 something that

00:11:47.880 Elon Musk

00:11:48.480 could do if

00:11:49.260 he had a

00:11:49.560 smartphone and

00:11:51.180 satellites.

00:11:52.280 So let's

00:11:52.640 say his

00:11:52.920 smartphone goes

00:11:53.660 through his

00:11:53.980 satellites.

00:11:55.200 Just think

00:11:55.760 about this.

00:11:57.720 Someday,

00:11:59.620 Elon Musk

00:12:00.600 could make a

00:12:02.240 smartphone that's

00:12:04.460 the only one

00:12:05.340 that can

00:12:06.820 make a

00:12:07.160 long-distance

00:12:07.820 call to

00:12:09.980 Mars.

00:12:12.980 That's like

00:12:13.680 real.

00:12:15.140 Now, it's

00:12:15.800 real if he

00:12:16.340 makes the

00:12:16.700 phone.

00:12:17.980 Am I

00:12:18.340 wrong?

00:12:19.780 There's nothing

00:12:20.560 technologically that

00:12:21.660 would stop you

00:12:22.240 from making a

00:12:23.000 phone call to

00:12:23.540 Mars except the

00:12:24.420 time lag.

00:12:25.680 Right?

00:12:27.100 Am I right?

00:12:28.480 Yeah.

00:12:29.240 And so you'd

00:12:29.840 say, how are you?

00:12:31.200 And you'd have to

00:12:32.000 wait half an hour for

00:12:32.940 a response.

00:12:35.460 But you could

00:12:36.220 sort of make a

00:12:36.880 phone call to

00:12:37.400 Mars, right?

00:12:38.840 Like technologically,

00:12:40.200 that's within the

00:12:41.500 realm of ordinary

00:12:42.560 engineering.

00:12:43.980 So I'm hearing

00:12:44.920 people say there's

00:12:45.640 a 20, 22

00:12:47.020 minute time lag.

00:12:49.580 But if you send

00:12:50.520 a voice message,

00:12:52.020 hey, hope your

00:12:53.380 trip to Mars was

00:12:54.140 good.

00:12:55.160 Let me know you

00:12:55.840 made it okay.

00:12:57.280 20 minutes later,

00:12:58.320 ring.

00:12:58.960 Yeah, I made it

00:12:59.480 okay.

00:13:01.360 Isn't that?

00:13:01.740 Oh, and you

00:13:02.640 could definitely

00:13:03.060 text.

00:13:04.280 You could text

00:13:04.960 Mars.

00:13:06.700 How you do?

00:13:07.740 How's it feel up

00:13:09.500 there?

00:13:09.840 Pretty good.

00:13:10.780 20 minutes later.

00:13:14.960 All right.

00:13:17.720 Jerry Jones.

00:13:19.940 Have I ever told

00:13:20.940 you that famous

00:13:21.780 people have a

00:13:23.500 history of being

00:13:24.200 famous ever since

00:13:25.260 they were kids?

00:13:25.820 there are some

00:13:27.840 people who seem

00:13:29.900 to be around

00:13:30.720 big events

00:13:31.860 like all of

00:13:33.360 their life.

00:13:34.940 You know, like

00:13:35.260 famously Bill

00:13:36.120 Clinton met

00:13:36.880 John F.

00:13:38.260 Kennedy when

00:13:38.820 Clinton was a

00:13:39.480 kid.

00:13:40.780 I don't feel

00:13:41.700 like these are

00:13:42.240 accidents.

00:13:43.360 I feel like

00:13:43.960 famous people

00:13:45.380 keep having

00:13:47.020 famous experiences

00:13:48.200 just over and

00:13:49.740 over again.

00:13:50.940 So Jerry Jones,

00:13:51.960 it turns out,

00:13:52.580 not to his

00:13:55.120 credit,

00:13:56.000 when he was

00:13:56.720 15 years old

00:13:57.680 was one of

00:13:58.380 the white

00:13:59.440 men, or

00:14:00.420 boys I guess,

00:14:01.540 who blocked

00:14:02.280 the North

00:14:04.540 Little Rock

00:14:05.060 High School

00:14:05.540 in Arkansas

00:14:06.900 65 years

00:14:10.200 ago,

00:14:11.080 blocked it

00:14:12.440 to prevent

00:14:13.620 integration of

00:14:14.560 the school.

00:14:14.960 people.

00:14:15.900 So basically,

00:14:17.340 he was, you

00:14:17.980 know, an

00:14:18.340 overt racist,

00:14:20.740 and he was

00:14:21.300 participating in

00:14:22.660 an overtly

00:14:23.880 racist act

00:14:25.860 that was not

00:14:26.460 just overtly

00:14:27.180 racist, it was

00:14:27.720 one of the

00:14:27.980 most famous

00:14:28.440 things that's

00:14:28.960 happened in

00:14:29.860 the United

00:14:30.220 States.

00:14:31.400 Now, what

00:14:31.680 are the odds

00:14:32.300 that one of

00:14:33.240 those people

00:14:33.840 was going to

00:14:35.320 be Jerry

00:14:35.720 Jones, or

00:14:37.180 would go on

00:14:37.820 to be, you

00:14:38.420 know, somebody

00:14:38.820 who's a common

00:14:40.420 name?

00:14:41.680 But when he

00:14:42.600 was challenged

00:14:43.240 about it, I

00:14:43.700 guess the photo

00:14:44.540 of him there

00:14:45.200 just surfaced.

00:14:46.360 He hasn't

00:14:46.920 mentioned it

00:14:47.360 before then.

00:14:48.340 He never

00:14:48.980 mentioned it,

00:14:49.840 which was a

00:14:50.340 good move.

00:14:51.780 And I was

00:14:52.500 interested in

00:14:53.100 the way, because

00:14:53.760 he's a very

00:14:54.300 high-functioning,

00:14:55.780 successful

00:14:56.700 entrepreneur,

00:14:57.460 right?

00:14:58.100 So he's

00:14:59.140 somebody you'd

00:14:59.640 expect to be

00:15:00.200 able to handle

00:15:00.720 something well.

00:15:02.760 And I'll just

00:15:04.360 tell you how he

00:15:05.000 did handle it.

00:15:06.020 You can judge

00:15:06.620 whether this

00:15:07.340 is handled

00:15:07.640 well.

00:15:08.620 First of all,

00:15:09.240 he didn't

00:15:09.600 defend it.

00:15:11.560 He said,

00:15:12.680 oh gosh,

00:15:13.160 that was

00:15:13.500 65 years

00:15:15.180 ago.

00:15:16.620 Now that's

00:15:17.340 good framing.

00:15:18.900 So the first

00:15:19.380 thing he says

00:15:20.000 is, gosh,

00:15:20.560 that's 65

00:15:21.160 years ago.

00:15:22.760 So that

00:15:23.360 was the

00:15:23.860 best way

00:15:25.840 to start

00:15:27.020 the conversation.

00:15:27.800 Yeah,

00:15:27.980 that was

00:15:28.460 what,

00:15:28.880 65 years

00:15:29.960 ago.

00:15:30.500 Because as

00:15:31.080 soon as you

00:15:31.460 hear that,

00:15:32.940 you get a

00:15:33.460 little bit

00:15:33.740 more flexible,

00:15:34.500 right?

00:15:34.680 And then

00:15:36.600 he goes

00:15:36.920 on to

00:15:37.280 say that

00:15:38.700 it really

00:15:40.900 reminds us

00:15:41.780 that we've

00:15:42.740 come a

00:15:43.080 long way.

00:15:44.420 Something like

00:15:44.980 that.

00:15:45.660 And I thought,

00:15:46.180 well, that was

00:15:46.480 pretty good.

00:15:47.360 Because he's

00:15:47.840 admitting that

00:15:48.420 that was not

00:15:49.000 the way to be,

00:15:50.360 and that we've

00:15:51.240 come a long

00:15:51.700 way, and he's

00:15:52.440 glad that we

00:15:52.940 have.

00:15:53.740 But he's not

00:15:54.480 running away from

00:15:55.120 the fact that

00:15:55.620 65 years ago he

00:15:56.820 was that kid.

00:15:58.900 Which, on some

00:16:00.000 weird level, I

00:16:00.780 appreciated.

00:16:01.340 I don't know

00:16:03.340 why.

00:16:03.720 I mean, I'm

00:16:04.240 not agreeing

00:16:05.140 with a 15

00:16:05.760 year old kid.

00:16:06.500 I'm saying

00:16:06.960 that I

00:16:07.240 appreciate he

00:16:07.800 just owned

00:16:08.220 it.

00:16:09.180 He just

00:16:09.540 owned it.

00:16:10.600 Yep, I

00:16:11.640 did that.

00:16:12.820 Wish I

00:16:13.300 hadn't done

00:16:13.560 that.

00:16:13.980 Now, he

00:16:14.300 stopped short

00:16:14.860 of saying,

00:16:15.820 you know, I'm

00:16:16.180 sorry, I wish

00:16:16.960 I hadn't done

00:16:17.520 it.

00:16:18.160 But it was

00:16:18.660 sort of there.

00:16:20.520 Like, the way

00:16:21.500 that he dealt

00:16:22.140 with it, the

00:16:22.940 implication was,

00:16:24.200 that was some

00:16:24.960 other guy.

00:16:26.280 I don't even

00:16:27.100 need to talk

00:16:27.620 about it.

00:16:29.060 And I do

00:16:29.820 very much

00:16:31.660 on board

00:16:32.220 with not

00:16:32.980 having to

00:16:33.500 explain what

00:16:34.200 you did

00:16:34.500 when you

00:16:34.780 were 15.

00:16:36.240 I couldn't

00:16:37.000 do it.

00:16:37.600 Could you?

00:16:38.500 Could you

00:16:39.080 defend your

00:16:39.620 15-year-old

00:16:40.340 self?

00:16:41.320 I couldn't

00:16:42.000 do it.

00:16:42.820 But I'll

00:16:43.260 tell you the

00:16:43.820 way I would

00:16:45.020 have handled

00:16:45.420 it.

00:16:46.260 I don't

00:16:46.820 know if

00:16:47.040 it's better.

00:16:48.480 But let's

00:16:48.980 say I got

00:16:50.040 accused of

00:16:50.620 some heinous

00:16:51.540 activity when

00:16:52.360 I was 15.

00:16:53.980 And then

00:16:54.320 somebody says,

00:16:55.280 explain it

00:16:55.740 today.

00:16:56.700 Here's how I

00:16:57.320 would explain

00:16:57.780 it.

00:16:57.980 You know,

00:16:59.400 I don't

00:17:00.020 like that

00:17:00.400 guy either.

00:17:02.740 That 15-year-old

00:17:04.120 who did that

00:17:04.960 thing, I hate

00:17:05.840 that guy.

00:17:07.960 That's it.

00:17:08.760 I agree with

00:17:09.300 you.

00:17:09.740 I don't like

00:17:10.340 him any more

00:17:10.720 than you do.

00:17:12.040 But I'm not

00:17:12.500 going to defend

00:17:13.040 somebody I'm

00:17:15.720 not.

00:17:16.680 I'll defend

00:17:17.360 who I am

00:17:17.860 today.

00:17:19.100 But if you

00:17:19.720 want me to

00:17:20.160 defend my

00:17:20.700 15-year-old

00:17:21.420 self, no,

00:17:22.380 I'm on your

00:17:22.780 side.

00:17:23.060 I don't like

00:17:23.440 that guy.

00:17:24.720 And I would

00:17:25.360 go further,

00:17:26.460 and here's the

00:17:27.020 high ground.

00:17:28.540 Here's how

00:17:28.940 you high ground

00:17:29.560 that.

00:17:30.480 You say, I'll

00:17:31.240 tell you, my

00:17:31.700 view, and this

00:17:32.480 is my actual

00:17:33.220 view, so this

00:17:34.060 is not like

00:17:35.960 weird sophistry,

00:17:37.640 this is my

00:17:38.060 actual view,

00:17:39.360 that a life

00:17:40.320 well lived is

00:17:42.320 where you start

00:17:43.280 very imperfect

00:17:44.120 and you try to

00:17:44.980 improve, and

00:17:46.440 that you do

00:17:47.080 the best you

00:17:47.520 can to improve

00:17:48.220 over the arc

00:17:48.820 of your life.

00:17:49.780 And I would

00:17:50.260 say, we all

00:17:51.200 started from a

00:17:51.920 low place.

00:17:52.460 success, you've

00:17:54.340 got a picture

00:17:54.820 of my starting

00:17:56.280 place.

00:17:57.140 The only thing

00:17:57.880 I would defend

00:17:58.440 is where I

00:17:58.960 went.

00:17:59.780 I'm not going

00:18:00.260 to defend where

00:18:00.820 I started.

00:18:01.980 And I'm not

00:18:02.660 going to ask

00:18:03.000 you to defend

00:18:03.580 where you

00:18:03.960 started, either.

00:18:05.020 I will ask you

00:18:06.400 to defend how

00:18:07.360 you're doing.

00:18:08.540 How you're

00:18:08.940 doing?

00:18:09.980 Are you

00:18:10.520 improving?

00:18:11.600 Did you learn

00:18:12.200 anything?

00:18:13.280 Are you the

00:18:13.700 same person you

00:18:14.360 were when you

00:18:14.800 were 15?

00:18:16.260 I hope not, but

00:18:18.040 I'm not going to

00:18:18.520 hate you for who

00:18:19.240 you were when

00:18:19.680 you were 15.

00:18:21.220 I'm not going

00:18:21.880 to apologize for

00:18:22.740 it.

00:18:23.220 I'm not going to

00:18:23.780 explain it.

00:18:24.860 I'm just going to

00:18:25.620 say that was a

00:18:26.240 different person,

00:18:27.360 same as you were

00:18:28.120 a different person

00:18:28.760 when you were 15.

00:18:29.820 We don't need to

00:18:30.620 explain that person.

00:18:31.940 We are supposed

00:18:32.700 to be better than

00:18:33.640 that person now.

00:18:35.020 Am I?

00:18:36.640 Well, I'll let you

00:18:37.360 decide.

00:18:38.480 But that's the only

00:18:39.280 thing I'll defend

00:18:39.940 is who I am now.

00:18:41.480 And that's the only

00:18:42.280 standard I'll hold

00:18:43.940 you to.

00:18:45.380 See, this helps

00:18:46.020 too, to make sure

00:18:47.860 that you're not a

00:18:48.340 hypocrite.

00:18:48.780 That's the standard

00:18:49.360 I'd hold you to.

00:18:50.800 I'm not going to

00:18:51.320 blame you for

00:18:51.800 anything you did

00:18:52.340 when you were 15.

00:18:57.060 But it's

00:18:59.380 interesting.

00:19:00.540 And I do think

00:19:01.360 the Jerry Jones

00:19:02.720 story is more

00:19:04.180 positive than

00:19:04.960 negative because

00:19:06.560 it shows the

00:19:08.180 evolution of

00:19:08.900 thought.

00:19:10.040 It shows the

00:19:10.940 evolution of

00:19:11.900 America.

00:19:13.420 You can see it

00:19:13.960 in one person.

00:19:16.480 And I have no

00:19:17.560 reason to believe

00:19:18.480 that he thinks

00:19:19.360 the same as he

00:19:19.920 did back then.

00:19:21.800 All right.

00:19:22.300 So I've seen,

00:19:23.560 yeah, I've said

00:19:24.200 long ago that the

00:19:25.440 Democrats were

00:19:26.080 really the party

00:19:26.620 of women.

00:19:27.040 But I'm seeing

00:19:30.880 more people coming

00:19:32.040 around to this

00:19:32.720 point of view

00:19:33.280 because it's so

00:19:34.400 obvious at this

00:19:35.300 point.

00:19:36.440 And I saw a

00:19:39.280 tweet by Jason

00:19:40.020 Andrews.

00:19:40.640 He says,

00:19:41.560 the Democrat

00:19:41.980 Party is America's

00:19:43.120 ex-wife.

00:19:43.760 wife, the

00:19:47.040 Democrat Party is

00:19:48.200 America's ex-wife.

00:19:53.660 Have you ever

00:19:54.560 heard a more

00:19:55.860 perfect summary?

00:19:58.360 Now, here's what I

00:19:59.660 believe.

00:20:00.780 Have I ever told you

00:20:01.700 that everything is

00:20:03.200 about procreation?

00:20:05.560 Of course I have.

00:20:07.880 Everything you do,

00:20:09.380 the clothes you

00:20:10.600 choose to put on

00:20:11.420 in the morning,

00:20:12.560 how much you eat,

00:20:14.060 whether you exercise,

00:20:15.400 the job you took,

00:20:16.580 where you live,

00:20:17.700 all of your

00:20:18.900 decisions are

00:20:21.120 based on your

00:20:22.020 procreation

00:20:23.420 instinct, right?

00:20:25.080 Everything from

00:20:25.920 sex to success

00:20:27.600 to just everything.

00:20:29.460 It's all about

00:20:30.660 procreation.

00:20:32.480 Now, you don't

00:20:33.000 think of it that

00:20:33.720 way because you're

00:20:34.500 going through your

00:20:35.000 life saying,

00:20:35.560 oh, I'm just

00:20:36.800 rearranging my

00:20:38.100 garage, but

00:20:39.420 somehow it all

00:20:40.520 ties back to

00:20:41.160 that.

00:20:42.020 It makes sense

00:20:43.200 that if there

00:20:44.060 were ever two

00:20:44.800 parties, see if

00:20:46.560 you can follow me

00:20:47.600 on this, I may

00:20:48.540 be going too

00:20:49.020 far, right?

00:20:51.860 Here's my

00:20:52.680 overall thought.

00:20:54.480 If ever there's

00:20:55.440 a situation with

00:20:56.260 two parties, the

00:20:57.800 most predictable

00:20:59.340 thing that would

00:20:59.960 happen is that

00:21:01.380 one of them would

00:21:02.000 become the woman

00:21:02.740 party and one

00:21:04.040 would become the

00:21:04.720 man party.

00:21:05.560 and that

00:21:07.100 whenever you

00:21:07.940 have a

00:21:08.760 civilization with

00:21:09.560 two main

00:21:10.060 parties, that's

00:21:11.460 the most likely

00:21:12.280 thing that will

00:21:12.800 happen because

00:21:13.800 our most basic

00:21:14.720 instinct is

00:21:15.680 procreation and

00:21:18.280 the male and

00:21:18.900 female strategies

00:21:20.020 for procreation

00:21:21.040 are different, so

00:21:22.720 that should cause

00:21:23.500 that.

00:21:24.200 Now, that's

00:21:25.820 exactly what we

00:21:26.580 see.

00:21:27.840 In my opinion,

00:21:29.480 the men who are

00:21:30.540 part of the

00:21:31.000 Democrat party,

00:21:31.820 some of it is

00:21:33.320 just inertia,

00:21:34.500 you know, your

00:21:35.200 parents were

00:21:35.720 Democrats, you're

00:21:36.600 Democrat.

00:21:37.640 But I think a

00:21:38.500 lot of it is

00:21:39.660 men with

00:21:40.200 different reproduction

00:21:42.060 strategies.

00:21:44.200 The men in the

00:21:45.820 Democrat party

00:21:46.780 believe their

00:21:48.120 best chance of

00:21:49.300 reproduction is to

00:21:50.500 make women happy,

00:21:51.520 party, which

00:21:58.860 suggests that

00:21:59.900 they'll eventually

00:22:00.480 all become

00:22:01.060 Republicans.

00:22:04.740 I've got a

00:22:05.420 theory that

00:22:05.860 there's a certain

00:22:06.480 amount of

00:22:06.880 marriage that

00:22:07.460 turns anybody

00:22:08.000 into a

00:22:08.460 Republican.

00:22:08.860 Just a theory.

00:22:13.340 I don't know how

00:22:14.100 many years of

00:22:14.660 marriage it takes to

00:22:15.440 turn you into a

00:22:16.140 Republican, but it

00:22:18.320 happens probably

00:22:18.860 within five.

00:22:22.440 So, what is

00:22:26.180 the reproduction

00:22:27.040 strategy of

00:22:28.180 Republican men?

00:22:30.660 What is the

00:22:31.660 reproduction strategy

00:22:32.740 of Republican men

00:22:33.740 versus Democrat

00:22:34.600 men?

00:22:35.300 I do believe the

00:22:36.300 Democrat male

00:22:37.140 strategy is to

00:22:37.940 make women happy,

00:22:39.840 and then they'll

00:22:40.860 have a name.

00:22:42.640 And the

00:22:43.140 Republican strategy

00:22:44.000 is what?

00:22:46.100 Act like men.

00:22:48.860 Their strategy

00:22:50.100 is to act like

00:22:50.720 men, and

00:22:52.000 then see if

00:22:52.620 that works out

00:22:53.120 for them.

00:22:55.660 It turns out

00:22:56.460 it does, because

00:22:57.720 when they act

00:22:58.240 like men, they

00:22:59.760 attract a certain

00:23:00.640 kind of woman

00:23:01.220 who wants

00:23:02.840 somebody who

00:23:03.240 acts like a

00:23:03.680 man, right?

00:23:05.180 Doesn't want

00:23:05.720 somebody who

00:23:06.120 agrees with them

00:23:06.700 all the time.

00:23:07.240 That's not

00:23:08.340 exactly reproduction

00:23:09.480 material there.

00:23:11.440 So, in my

00:23:14.880 opinion, everything

00:23:15.940 is explained by

00:23:16.840 that.

00:23:17.060 Now, as was

00:23:19.540 also pointed

00:23:20.060 out, teachers

00:23:21.160 unions are

00:23:21.940 like three

00:23:22.560 quarters female.

00:23:24.360 The people

00:23:24.940 who are doing

00:23:25.540 DEI and people

00:23:26.880 working human

00:23:27.620 resources, and

00:23:28.760 basically, most

00:23:32.740 of the groups

00:23:33.800 that are active

00:23:35.680 and really make

00:23:36.580 a difference in

00:23:37.120 the country,

00:23:37.600 they're female

00:23:38.320 run.

00:23:39.800 And so, it

00:23:40.480 really has become

00:23:41.440 a male party

00:23:42.920 versus a female

00:23:43.740 party.

00:23:44.460 Abortion being

00:23:45.320 the clearest

00:23:46.800 distinction.

00:23:49.200 If you didn't

00:23:50.280 know what the

00:23:50.920 issue was, let's

00:23:52.260 say you're an

00:23:53.840 alien, and

00:23:54.980 somebody said,

00:23:55.980 well, you don't

00:23:56.560 know even what

00:23:57.120 abortion is, but

00:23:57.900 we'll just tell

00:23:58.440 you this.

00:23:59.960 There is one

00:24:00.800 group that says

00:24:01.500 we want it, and

00:24:03.400 there's one group

00:24:03.960 that says we

00:24:05.240 don't want that.

00:24:07.060 Is the group

00:24:07.880 that says they

00:24:08.460 want it most

00:24:09.680 likely the ones

00:24:10.660 who are going

00:24:11.080 to have it?

00:24:11.600 Yes.

00:24:13.700 It makes sense

00:24:14.860 that women

00:24:15.760 would want

00:24:16.300 options.

00:24:18.080 If I were a

00:24:18.940 man, if I

00:24:20.200 were a man,

00:24:21.180 allegedly I'm

00:24:22.040 male, if I

00:24:24.100 were a man who

00:24:24.720 could have a

00:24:25.220 baby, I

00:24:26.960 would want

00:24:27.520 abortion to be

00:24:32.980 legal.

00:24:34.680 Not because I

00:24:35.640 wanted to have

00:24:36.140 one, but

00:24:37.420 because I want

00:24:38.220 more rights,

00:24:39.600 not fewer.

00:24:41.600 Every time you

00:24:42.260 said, Scott,

00:24:42.840 would you like

00:24:43.320 more rights or

00:24:44.100 fewer rights, I

00:24:45.140 don't even know

00:24:46.420 what the subject

00:24:46.940 is, but how

00:24:47.780 about more?

00:24:48.840 How about more

00:24:49.400 rights?

00:24:49.960 I'll always take

00:24:50.540 more rights.

00:24:51.840 Now, if you're

00:24:52.480 saying to me,

00:24:53.520 but Scott, you

00:24:54.580 would be killing

00:24:55.260 children, I'd say

00:24:56.240 no, no.

00:24:57.940 I didn't say I

00:24:58.620 would get an

00:24:59.220 abortion.

00:25:00.460 I didn't say

00:25:01.080 that I would

00:25:01.660 encourage you to

00:25:02.380 get one.

00:25:03.660 I would say

00:25:04.160 that every time

00:25:05.260 you ask me do

00:25:05.960 you want to have

00:25:06.900 more options or

00:25:07.860 fewer options, I

00:25:09.900 generally default to

00:25:11.000 more options.

00:25:12.320 And I think

00:25:12.760 people in general

00:25:13.540 do.

00:25:14.320 People in

00:25:14.820 general want

00:25:16.020 more options,

00:25:16.820 not fewer.

00:25:17.800 So it makes

00:25:18.840 sense to me that

00:25:19.560 the woman party,

00:25:21.320 the Democrats,

00:25:22.140 would move toward

00:25:23.160 making, giving

00:25:24.940 themselves more

00:25:25.560 options, and it

00:25:27.480 makes sense that

00:25:28.220 the male-dominated

00:25:30.040 party, Republicans,

00:25:32.120 would be less

00:25:33.640 likely to do

00:25:34.580 that because to

00:25:35.200 them it just

00:25:35.620 looks like murder.

00:25:36.280 murder, right?

00:25:37.880 So you don't

00:25:38.540 want to give

00:25:38.860 somebody the

00:25:39.240 option of

00:25:39.960 murder from

00:25:40.820 their point of

00:25:41.380 view.

00:25:42.740 But you can

00:25:44.040 sort of predict

00:25:44.660 everything that's

00:25:45.420 going to happen

00:25:45.860 based on the

00:25:46.740 mom and dad,

00:25:48.440 male and female

00:25:49.380 procreation model.

00:25:52.300 Now, how

00:25:53.440 seriously should

00:25:54.820 you take this?

00:25:56.760 Here's how

00:25:57.340 seriously.

00:25:58.280 Remember I

00:25:58.880 told you there

00:25:59.380 are only two

00:25:59.800 things you can

00:26:00.360 know.

00:26:01.600 The first thing

00:26:02.300 you can know is

00:26:02.920 that you exist

00:26:03.700 because you're

00:26:05.300 noodling with the

00:26:06.720 question of who

00:26:07.340 you are.

00:26:08.580 So there's

00:26:09.520 something that

00:26:10.060 exists, you just

00:26:11.280 don't know what

00:26:11.680 that is.

00:26:12.540 The second thing

00:26:13.500 that you can know

00:26:14.340 is that it's your

00:26:15.700 impression that

00:26:17.340 some things are

00:26:18.080 predictable.

00:26:19.420 That's it.

00:26:20.640 You know, science

00:26:21.260 in particular is

00:26:22.060 more predictable

00:26:22.660 than most people.

00:26:24.200 But if that's

00:26:25.060 all you know,

00:26:28.140 and I give you

00:26:29.200 these various

00:26:30.280 models of

00:26:30.900 predicting,

00:26:31.840 does follow the

00:26:32.780 money predict

00:26:33.340 well?

00:26:34.400 It does,

00:26:34.980 doesn't it?

00:26:36.260 I don't know

00:26:37.100 if it should,

00:26:38.860 but it seems

00:26:39.500 to.

00:26:40.620 Now, here's the

00:26:41.460 second thing.

00:26:42.400 Does follow

00:26:43.120 procreation as

00:26:44.780 the dominant

00:26:45.580 way of

00:26:46.040 understanding

00:26:46.540 things to

00:26:47.040 happen,

00:26:47.500 does that

00:26:48.040 predict?

00:26:49.340 I think it

00:26:49.900 does.

00:26:50.620 But I don't

00:26:51.280 know if it

00:26:51.660 predicts as

00:26:52.140 well as

00:26:53.340 follow the

00:26:53.820 money.

00:26:54.340 If you ever

00:26:55.000 got into a

00:26:55.520 situation where

00:26:56.160 it was one

00:26:56.540 or the

00:26:56.760 other,

00:26:59.100 I don't

00:26:59.400 know.

00:27:00.420 Does abortion

00:27:01.600 follow the

00:27:02.220 money?

00:27:02.420 It sort

00:27:04.400 of does.

00:27:05.700 Because if

00:27:06.340 you say to

00:27:06.780 people,

00:27:07.360 you're going

00:27:08.400 to have to

00:27:08.840 have a baby

00:27:09.480 that you

00:27:10.020 will financially

00:27:10.740 support for

00:27:11.460 18 years,

00:27:12.460 that's a

00:27:13.140 pretty big

00:27:13.840 expense.

00:27:14.940 You would

00:27:15.260 expect that

00:27:15.840 people would

00:27:16.240 say, I would

00:27:16.760 like the

00:27:17.060 option of not

00:27:17.740 having that

00:27:18.340 expense.

00:27:18.820 expense.

00:27:20.060 I would like

00:27:20.200 the option

00:27:20.800 of not

00:27:21.320 having that

00:27:21.780 expense.

00:27:22.740 So even

00:27:23.260 abortion follows

00:27:25.180 the money.

00:27:26.920 It's a very

00:27:27.800 good predictive

00:27:28.600 way.

00:27:29.340 Now I don't

00:27:29.800 know if

00:27:30.640 there's a

00:27:31.060 reason for

00:27:31.680 it or is

00:27:32.200 a coincidence.

00:27:33.320 It doesn't

00:27:34.040 seem like a

00:27:34.620 coincidence.

00:27:35.700 I mean,

00:27:36.100 you could come

00:27:37.400 up with an

00:27:37.820 obvious reason

00:27:38.440 why money

00:27:38.940 affects things.

00:27:40.500 But follow

00:27:41.720 this.

00:27:43.200 Let's see if

00:27:43.960 we can make a

00:27:44.440 prediction.

00:27:44.760 If the

00:27:48.320 Democrat

00:27:49.340 party is

00:27:50.220 the woman

00:27:51.080 first party,

00:27:53.940 would they

00:27:54.960 nominate

00:27:55.820 somebody like

00:27:56.440 Joe Biden

00:27:57.060 to lead

00:27:57.580 them?

00:28:00.280 Yes, they

00:28:01.000 would.

00:28:02.280 Because he's

00:28:03.040 not a strong

00:28:03.780 male figure at

00:28:04.700 the moment.

00:28:05.600 When he was

00:28:06.060 younger, he was.

00:28:07.080 But at the

00:28:07.500 moment, he's

00:28:07.980 not a powerful

00:28:08.600 male, and

00:28:09.180 they don't

00:28:09.420 really like

00:28:10.720 powerful male

00:28:12.480 figures.

00:28:13.480 They want

00:28:13.900 somebody who

00:28:14.380 just looks

00:28:14.740 like, you

00:28:15.860 know, grandpa

00:28:16.720 will watch

00:28:17.620 the kids

00:28:18.040 when you

00:28:18.340 have a

00:28:18.820 date night.

00:28:20.220 So that's

00:28:20.840 what Biden

00:28:21.220 is.

00:28:21.820 Biden is

00:28:22.480 basically your

00:28:23.820 grandparent

00:28:24.440 who watches

00:28:25.300 the kids

00:28:25.800 while you

00:28:26.080 have a

00:28:26.260 date night.

00:28:27.100 He's very

00:28:27.460 safe.

00:28:29.040 And whereas

00:28:30.780 Trump is

00:28:32.820 scary to

00:28:34.660 women.

00:28:35.680 Let's see

00:28:36.360 what else

00:28:36.720 you could

00:28:37.080 predict based

00:28:38.680 on that

00:28:39.380 model.

00:28:40.180 Is there

00:28:40.560 any other

00:28:42.480 thing that

00:28:43.080 you could

00:28:43.340 predict?

00:28:43.660 what about

00:28:48.040 climate

00:28:48.480 change?

00:28:50.820 Could you

00:28:51.280 predict that

00:28:53.020 Democrats would

00:28:53.800 be more

00:28:54.140 concerned about

00:28:54.760 it?

00:29:00.780 Maybe

00:29:01.180 indirectly.

00:29:01.740 no, you're

00:29:08.680 an idiot.

00:29:10.480 Orange

00:29:10.840 out.

00:29:11.600 Orange

00:29:11.900 out, you're

00:29:12.400 out.

00:29:13.420 So every

00:29:13.960 time somebody

00:29:14.480 imagines they

00:29:15.400 know what's in

00:29:16.040 my mind, you

00:29:17.900 get banned.

00:29:19.360 Stop

00:29:19.740 imagining.

00:29:20.280 You can just

00:29:20.680 ask.

00:29:21.600 It's not like I

00:29:22.300 don't tell you my

00:29:22.960 opinion.

00:29:24.360 I'm the last

00:29:25.300 person who you

00:29:26.040 should have to

00:29:26.680 try to read

00:29:28.000 my mind.

00:29:28.600 I literally

00:29:29.980 tell you every

00:29:30.660 fucking thing

00:29:31.260 I think.

00:29:32.260 You don't

00:29:32.860 have to guess.

00:29:34.020 I'll give you

00:29:34.440 my reasons.

00:29:39.020 And to be

00:29:41.880 clear, I'm

00:29:43.520 not supporting

00:29:44.140 Trump for

00:29:45.960 re-election.

00:29:48.080 Just so you

00:29:49.220 hear it as

00:29:49.560 clearly as

00:29:50.120 possible.

00:29:51.160 Could I

00:29:51.500 change my

00:29:52.020 mind?

00:29:53.480 Do you

00:29:53.720 think I

00:29:54.020 could change

00:29:54.480 my mind?

00:29:55.740 Yeah,

00:29:56.140 absolutely.

00:29:57.340 Sure I

00:29:57.720 could.

00:29:57.840 I'm just

00:29:59.500 saying at

00:29:59.840 the moment

00:30:00.320 it's not

00:30:03.520 my choice

00:30:03.940 at the

00:30:04.180 moment.

00:30:05.100 But you

00:30:05.580 know, I

00:30:05.760 have to

00:30:05.940 make real

00:30:06.560 world

00:30:06.840 decisions as

00:30:07.580 well.

00:30:09.700 Alright, is

00:30:10.800 there any

00:30:11.020 prediction you

00:30:11.620 would make

00:30:12.040 about, what

00:30:13.880 prediction would

00:30:14.520 you make based

00:30:15.380 on only the

00:30:17.400 gender

00:30:17.820 procreation

00:30:18.640 model?

00:30:19.180 Is there

00:30:19.360 anything you

00:30:19.700 would predict

00:30:20.140 based on

00:30:20.620 that?

00:30:25.040 Socialism?

00:30:25.480 I mean, you

00:30:27.420 would predict

00:30:27.900 that the

00:30:28.240 Democrats

00:30:28.600 would want

00:30:29.100 more

00:30:29.320 socialism?

00:30:31.660 Gun control?

00:30:33.220 Yeah.

00:30:34.900 Yep.

00:30:36.460 There was a

00:30:37.340 story in the

00:30:37.860 news of some

00:30:39.460 woman who was

00:30:40.060 getting carjacked

00:30:40.940 and she just

00:30:41.580 blew the head

00:30:42.180 off of one of

00:30:42.960 the carjackers

00:30:43.800 and the second

00:30:45.400 one returned

00:30:46.020 fire and she

00:30:47.220 got wounded but

00:30:48.020 survived.

00:30:49.500 And I thought,

00:30:51.180 you know,

00:30:51.760 when you see

00:30:52.500 women taking

00:30:53.160 men's heads

00:30:53.740 off, we're

00:30:56.580 in a whole

00:30:57.080 different world

00:30:58.380 but good

00:31:00.140 for her.

00:31:02.860 So,

00:31:03.600 Twitter amnesty

00:31:05.060 is coming.

00:31:07.080 So, I guess

00:31:07.620 Musk has said

00:31:08.740 he did a poll

00:31:09.880 and 72% said

00:31:11.380 they wanted

00:31:11.880 full amnesty.

00:31:13.660 You heard my

00:31:14.560 opinion that if

00:31:15.420 you were ever

00:31:15.880 going to do

00:31:16.420 full amnesty,

00:31:17.280 this would be

00:31:17.660 the one best

00:31:18.260 time to do it

00:31:19.000 because then you

00:31:19.860 don't say it's a

00:31:20.480 precedent, you're

00:31:21.240 just saying it's

00:31:22.240 a once only,

00:31:23.100 new ownership

00:31:23.680 and, you know,

00:31:25.700 if you get banned

00:31:26.300 again, don't expect

00:31:27.220 to come back.

00:31:28.060 It's a perfect

00:31:28.580 time to do it.

00:31:29.640 Now, will the

00:31:30.500 experiment work?

00:31:33.240 Do you think

00:31:33.680 Twitter will become

00:31:34.560 a hellhole

00:31:35.960 of, you know,

00:31:37.320 racists and

00:31:38.380 KKK and

00:31:39.440 everything else?

00:31:40.580 I'm going to

00:31:41.200 say a little

00:31:42.440 bit.

00:31:43.740 A little bit.

00:31:45.140 You know,

00:31:45.420 some of the bad

00:31:46.260 people will come

00:31:46.820 back and they'll

00:31:47.460 test the system.

00:31:49.620 The first thing

00:31:50.640 some of the bad

00:31:51.260 people are going

00:31:51.820 to do is what?

00:31:53.380 They're going to

00:31:53.920 try to get banned

00:31:54.500 again.

00:31:55.620 So they're going

00:31:56.240 to say some

00:31:56.760 shit just to

00:31:57.980 get banned

00:31:58.360 again.

00:31:59.680 And they're

00:32:00.300 going to push

00:32:00.720 the envelope,

00:32:02.480 right?

00:32:03.020 So some will

00:32:03.740 just get banned

00:32:04.340 again.

00:32:05.680 And I would

00:32:07.500 be happy if

00:32:08.480 all Twitter did

00:32:09.440 was stick to

00:32:10.980 its own

00:32:11.380 guidelines for

00:32:12.140 who to ban

00:32:12.560 next time.

00:32:13.680 Because those

00:32:14.340 same people will

00:32:15.100 disappear if

00:32:16.920 they violate

00:32:17.560 Twitter terms

00:32:19.340 the service.

00:32:20.320 So I'm not

00:32:21.120 really too

00:32:21.560 afraid of it.

00:32:23.060 Is anybody

00:32:23.700 worried about

00:32:24.260 it?

00:32:25.280 I think

00:32:25.840 there'll be

00:32:26.120 a little

00:32:26.520 churn and

00:32:29.120 turmoil there

00:32:30.000 for a little

00:32:30.360 bit, but

00:32:30.780 no big deal.

00:32:32.980 Now, if

00:32:35.960 you're saying

00:32:36.440 to yourself,

00:32:37.280 this is a

00:32:38.400 good decision

00:32:39.060 or a bad

00:32:39.580 decision,

00:32:40.180 which one

00:32:40.560 is right?

00:32:42.560 It's a good

00:32:43.260 decision to

00:32:44.400 bring them

00:32:44.740 back or it's

00:32:45.520 a bad decision.

00:32:46.180 Who's right?

00:32:46.860 Go.

00:32:47.260 In the

00:32:47.960 comments,

00:32:49.080 who's right?

00:32:50.600 Go.

00:32:55.980 How could

00:32:56.700 you fool for

00:32:57.380 the, how did

00:32:58.000 you fall for

00:32:58.520 my trick?

00:33:00.100 Okay, if I

00:33:00.880 told you that's

00:33:01.500 a trick question,

00:33:02.940 it's a trick

00:33:03.920 question, now

00:33:05.320 answer it again.

00:33:06.120 It's a trick

00:33:06.520 question.

00:33:11.180 Oh, come on.

00:33:13.180 Come on.

00:33:14.600 Come on,

00:33:14.960 come on,

00:33:15.200 come on.

00:33:16.180 Oh, I

00:33:17.860 totally primed

00:33:18.820 you so that

00:33:19.440 you can't

00:33:19.840 see it.

00:33:21.360 So I

00:33:22.420 created a

00:33:22.920 cognitive

00:33:23.260 blindness in

00:33:24.080 you.

00:33:24.980 Here's the

00:33:25.440 cognitive

00:33:25.800 blindness.

00:33:26.720 When I

00:33:27.080 tell you the

00:33:27.520 real answer,

00:33:28.240 you're going

00:33:28.520 to go, oh,

00:33:29.180 shit, how

00:33:29.880 did I miss

00:33:30.520 that?

00:33:31.340 This is

00:33:31.660 going to

00:33:31.820 piss you

00:33:32.160 off.

00:33:33.920 No, the

00:33:34.480 real answer

00:33:34.960 is he's

00:33:35.440 A-B

00:33:35.720 testing rapidly.

00:33:37.280 There's no

00:33:37.620 right or, it's

00:33:38.340 not good or

00:33:39.280 bad.

00:33:40.180 It's something

00:33:40.740 he's going to

00:33:41.220 try, and if

00:33:42.320 it doesn't

00:33:42.700 work, he can

00:33:43.240 immediately

00:33:43.640 reverse it.

00:33:44.300 If you're

00:33:45.980 talking about

00:33:46.480 whether it's

00:33:46.840 a good idea

00:33:47.440 or a bad

00:33:47.820 idea, you're

00:33:49.180 not even on

00:33:49.680 the right

00:33:49.920 page.

00:33:51.040 You're not

00:33:51.420 even in the

00:33:51.860 right conversation.

00:33:53.540 The question

00:33:54.300 is, is

00:33:55.040 testing it

00:33:55.880 smart or

00:33:56.660 not smart?

00:33:57.260 And for

00:33:58.820 that, there's

00:33:59.720 not really

00:34:00.100 much debate.

00:34:01.300 Of course

00:34:01.980 testing it

00:34:02.580 is smart.

00:34:03.780 Of course.

00:34:05.440 Now, if

00:34:06.540 he tests it

00:34:07.120 and it

00:34:07.380 doesn't work,

00:34:08.880 what would

00:34:09.340 be the

00:34:09.640 smart thing

00:34:10.140 to do

00:34:10.440 then?

00:34:11.940 Reverse it.

00:34:14.000 Reverse it.

00:34:15.280 Right?

00:34:15.660 Or put in

00:34:16.160 some rules

00:34:16.740 that, you

00:34:17.260 know, gradually

00:34:17.820 reverse it or

00:34:18.620 something.

00:34:19.360 So, if you

00:34:20.560 don't understand

00:34:21.320 that what he's

00:34:21.960 doing is

00:34:22.740 moving fast,

00:34:24.220 breaking things,

00:34:25.540 and then

00:34:26.020 adjusting,

00:34:27.260 then you're

00:34:27.900 missing the

00:34:28.300 show.

00:34:30.060 Right?

00:34:30.420 The show is

00:34:30.980 not Elon Musk

00:34:33.020 doing correct

00:34:33.660 things.

00:34:34.880 If you're

00:34:35.540 looking for,

00:34:36.060 is that

00:34:36.340 correct?

00:34:37.180 Is that

00:34:37.540 incorrect?

00:34:38.180 You're

00:34:38.620 missing the

00:34:39.020 whole show.

00:34:40.180 The whole

00:34:40.740 show is that

00:34:41.680 he doesn't

00:34:42.100 know either.

00:34:43.640 None of us

00:34:44.180 know.

00:34:45.480 Nobody knows

00:34:46.440 the right

00:34:46.840 answer.

00:34:48.500 He's finding

00:34:49.320 out.

00:34:50.500 He's just

00:34:51.020 putting it

00:34:51.540 out there,

00:34:52.420 completely

00:34:52.940 transparent.

00:34:53.980 Here it is.

00:34:55.060 Did that

00:34:55.480 work?

00:34:56.320 Oh, that

00:34:56.720 didn't work.

00:34:57.100 I guess

00:34:57.420 I'll do

00:34:57.660 something

00:34:57.860 else.

00:35:01.960 Scott

00:35:02.480 waited for

00:35:03.220 two years

00:35:03.800 to speak

00:35:04.300 up against

00:35:04.800 forced

00:35:05.180 masking

00:35:05.660 and

00:35:05.880 lockdowns.

00:35:07.280 Jaina,

00:35:07.820 you stupid

00:35:08.360 cunt.

00:35:08.860 That's not

00:35:09.400 true.

00:35:10.780 Completely

00:35:11.260 false.

00:35:12.100 Never

00:35:12.320 been in

00:35:13.080 favor of

00:35:13.640 mandates.

00:35:14.880 Boom.

00:35:15.880 Stupid

00:35:16.400 cunt.

00:35:17.960 All right.

00:35:19.880 By the

00:35:20.500 way, that's

00:35:20.820 something I

00:35:21.300 couldn't say

00:35:21.780 with full

00:35:22.280 immunity

00:35:22.660 before.

00:35:23.540 Do you

00:35:23.680 know why I

00:35:24.080 can call

00:35:24.580 my trolls

00:35:25.700 stupid

00:35:26.060 cunts and

00:35:26.860 I don't

00:35:27.140 get knocked

00:35:28.400 off of

00:35:28.820 social media?

00:35:30.400 Do you

00:35:30.600 know why?

00:35:33.960 Not because

00:35:34.840 of Elon.

00:35:37.480 No, it's

00:35:38.180 because I do

00:35:38.720 it with

00:35:38.940 respect.

00:35:41.580 The reason I

00:35:42.520 can call

00:35:42.840 women stupid

00:35:43.520 cunts is the

00:35:44.240 same reason I

00:35:44.820 can call men

00:35:45.500 fucking dicks.

00:35:47.000 because I

00:35:48.320 respect their

00:35:49.680 full humanity.

00:35:51.760 If you

00:35:52.240 come at

00:35:52.680 me, I'm

00:35:53.840 not going to

00:35:54.140 take it easy

00:35:54.620 on you.

00:35:55.320 I mean, if

00:35:55.820 it were a

00:35:56.160 physical fight,

00:35:56.900 I'd take it

00:35:57.340 easy on you.

00:35:58.120 But I'm

00:35:58.440 not going to

00:35:58.720 take it easy

00:35:59.180 on you

00:35:59.540 because you're

00:35:59.880 a woman.

00:36:01.080 You don't

00:36:01.400 get that.

00:36:01.920 Not on

00:36:02.660 Twitter.

00:36:03.500 On Twitter,

00:36:04.040 it's just

00:36:04.280 fuck you.

00:36:06.020 That's the

00:36:06.500 whole conversation.

00:36:08.380 All right.

00:36:10.080 So what

00:36:11.120 was I talking

00:36:11.540 about?

00:36:11.780 Oh, the

00:36:12.040 Twitter

00:36:12.240 amnesty.

00:36:13.920 So, yeah,

00:36:15.940 it's just a

00:36:16.500 good idea.

00:36:17.000 to try it.

00:36:19.200 We'll find

00:36:20.000 out later if

00:36:20.580 it's a good

00:36:20.940 idea to

00:36:21.540 keep them

00:36:22.460 there.

00:36:23.340 But it's

00:36:23.640 definitely a

00:36:24.140 good idea

00:36:24.460 to try it.

00:36:26.000 And let's

00:36:26.960 talk about

00:36:27.540 that Mar-a-Lago

00:36:30.140 situation and

00:36:31.920 Nick Fuentes

00:36:35.480 and Ye and

00:36:37.120 Milo.

00:36:41.440 All right.

00:36:42.760 So, in

00:36:44.300 my opinion,

00:36:45.380 well, first

00:36:46.200 of all,

00:36:46.500 Trump

00:36:47.340 responded,

00:36:49.340 he said he

00:36:49.980 basically had

00:36:50.640 a good

00:36:51.460 conversation

00:36:52.160 with Ye

00:36:53.600 that went

00:36:54.240 well,

00:36:55.080 according to

00:36:55.800 Trump.

00:36:57.240 And just

00:36:58.660 at the end

00:36:59.160 of his

00:36:59.500 statement,

00:37:00.040 he goes,

00:37:00.540 and I

00:37:00.920 didn't know

00:37:01.260 who Nick

00:37:01.780 Fuentes

00:37:02.080 was.

00:37:04.120 Do you

00:37:04.920 believe that?

00:37:06.240 Do you

00:37:06.840 believe that

00:37:07.260 the president

00:37:07.920 didn't know

00:37:08.840 who Nick

00:37:09.720 Fuentes

00:37:10.020 was?

00:37:10.460 I wouldn't

00:37:13.400 have believed

00:37:13.860 it, except

00:37:14.860 for Axios's

00:37:16.040 reporting.

00:37:17.540 So, Axios,

00:37:18.480 if you don't

00:37:18.920 know, they're

00:37:19.460 not in the

00:37:20.200 bag for the

00:37:20.780 left or the

00:37:21.360 right, which

00:37:22.100 is very unique.

00:37:23.140 People always

00:37:23.700 ask, hey, why

00:37:24.640 can't you have a

00:37:25.200 news source that's

00:37:26.660 neither bigoted

00:37:27.920 left or bigoted

00:37:28.780 right?

00:37:29.520 We have one.

00:37:31.020 Axios actually

00:37:31.940 does genuinely,

00:37:33.960 I think,

00:37:37.240 follows where

00:37:37.840 the news

00:37:38.200 goes.

00:37:39.780 And Axios

00:37:40.400 reports that

00:37:42.100 some verbatims

00:37:43.280 from it, and

00:37:44.380 we do know

00:37:45.160 from Axios

00:37:46.200 that Trump

00:37:48.180 was asking

00:37:48.900 Nick Fuentes

00:37:49.460 who he was.

00:37:51.260 So, if we

00:37:51.980 know that

00:37:52.480 Trump asked

00:37:53.560 him who he

00:37:53.980 was, and

00:37:54.520 even asked

00:37:55.020 him if he

00:37:55.460 was represented

00:37:56.640 at the

00:37:56.960 extreme part

00:37:57.700 of his

00:37:57.960 party, you

00:37:59.980 could see

00:38:00.360 that Trump

00:38:00.860 was catching

00:38:01.620 on who

00:38:03.140 he had

00:38:03.460 at the

00:38:03.720 table.

00:38:04.820 If Axios

00:38:05.820 has the

00:38:06.220 right reporting.

00:38:07.160 And they

00:38:07.300 do, before

00:38:08.620 you make fun

00:38:09.160 of Axios, go

00:38:09.940 do your own

00:38:11.180 research on

00:38:11.980 that.

00:38:12.860 I think you'll

00:38:13.380 find out that

00:38:13.980 they play it

00:38:14.760 straight.

00:38:15.720 If I'm wrong,

00:38:16.640 let me know.

00:38:17.520 But I think

00:38:18.060 they try to

00:38:18.580 play it

00:38:18.880 straight.

00:38:20.980 Anyway, if

00:38:21.760 it's true that

00:38:22.780 Trump was

00:38:23.660 asking who

00:38:24.260 he was, and

00:38:25.340 asked him

00:38:25.840 directly if he

00:38:26.760 represented the

00:38:27.480 extreme part of

00:38:28.180 the party, you

00:38:29.060 could see that

00:38:29.600 Trump was

00:38:30.360 working through

00:38:31.260 it, and

00:38:31.960 that he didn't

00:38:32.360 know exactly

00:38:32.900 who he was.

00:38:33.440 So I

00:38:34.440 believe that.

00:38:35.080 I believe he

00:38:35.440 didn't know.

00:38:36.260 Now, do you

00:38:37.120 think that

00:38:37.420 Trump handled

00:38:38.020 it well, from

00:38:40.360 your perspective,

00:38:41.920 by saying he

00:38:42.600 didn't know who

00:38:43.040 he was, so

00:38:43.960 therefore, it's

00:38:45.840 not exactly a

00:38:46.580 big crime or a

00:38:47.240 big foul.

00:38:48.160 It was just

00:38:48.660 dinner.

00:38:50.300 So from the

00:38:51.820 perspective of

00:38:52.540 Trump's base,

00:38:54.020 did he explain it

00:38:55.040 sufficiently?

00:38:55.460 I think so.

00:38:58.600 From the

00:39:00.680 perspective of a

00:39:01.640 voter, that's

00:39:03.360 kind of all you

00:39:03.920 needed to know,

00:39:04.540 wasn't it?

00:39:05.420 He wasn't

00:39:05.960 invited.

00:39:07.800 Trump trusted

00:39:09.100 yay.

00:39:10.960 Trump trusted a

00:39:12.080 black man, which

00:39:14.840 unfortunately is

00:39:15.520 part of the

00:39:15.880 story, right?

00:39:17.000 So the whole

00:39:18.160 story is that

00:39:18.900 Trump trusted a

00:39:20.060 black guy, and

00:39:22.280 that didn't work

00:39:22.920 out for him.

00:39:23.460 Am I right?

00:39:26.000 That's one way

00:39:26.600 to, is that not

00:39:28.100 an accurate

00:39:29.000 interpretation?

00:39:31.020 Trump's problem

00:39:31.780 was he trusted a

00:39:32.720 black guy, and

00:39:33.980 he got screwed.

00:39:36.520 Am I wrong?

00:39:38.700 Now, I don't

00:39:40.580 think it's fair to

00:39:41.180 call Kanye a

00:39:41.880 black guy, because

00:39:43.440 he sort of

00:39:45.900 transcended race

00:39:47.340 in a lot of

00:39:48.280 ways.

00:39:52.160 But you could

00:39:53.000 easily spin it

00:39:53.720 that way.

00:39:54.720 To me, it

00:39:55.120 looks like a

00:39:55.840 black guy

00:39:56.460 screwed Trump.

00:39:58.620 And I like

00:39:59.120 yay, by the

00:39:59.620 way, but it

00:40:00.320 looks like he

00:40:00.800 did that

00:40:01.180 intentionally.

00:40:02.020 Can't tell.

00:40:03.020 I can't read

00:40:03.540 his mind, but

00:40:04.100 it looks

00:40:04.380 intentional.

00:40:05.420 I mean, from

00:40:05.740 the outside, it

00:40:06.300 has that look.

00:40:07.220 So it looks

00:40:07.600 like a black

00:40:08.100 guy took Trump

00:40:09.080 out, or

00:40:10.180 tried to, and

00:40:12.620 Trump's just

00:40:13.180 brushing it off,

00:40:14.060 because, now,

00:40:15.240 do you think

00:40:15.540 people will just

00:40:16.040 forget this story

00:40:16.820 in two weeks?

00:40:17.840 So it doesn't

00:40:18.620 really matter.

00:40:19.060 The base

00:40:21.140 will.

00:40:22.100 Yeah, the

00:40:22.720 base will

00:40:23.140 forget it in

00:40:23.720 a day.

00:40:24.700 But here's

00:40:25.140 what you're

00:40:25.460 forgetting.

00:40:26.700 You're missing

00:40:27.180 the biggest

00:40:27.660 part of the

00:40:28.080 story.

00:40:29.180 The biggest

00:40:29.820 part of the

00:40:30.140 story is it

00:40:30.600 doesn't matter

00:40:31.060 what Trump's

00:40:31.820 base thinks.

00:40:34.000 It always

00:40:34.700 did, but it

00:40:36.260 doesn't now.

00:40:36.900 Do you know

00:40:37.180 why?

00:40:38.780 Do you know

00:40:39.060 why it doesn't

00:40:39.560 matter what the

00:40:40.080 base thinks of

00:40:40.680 Trump?

00:40:41.880 Because the

00:40:42.540 media already

00:40:43.140 left him.

00:40:45.120 So Breitbart

00:40:45.880 went at him

00:40:46.600 hard.

00:40:47.460 I don't know if

00:40:47.840 he noticed.

00:40:48.700 But Breitbart

00:40:49.320 didn't pull

00:40:50.200 any punches.

00:40:51.320 It's just

00:40:51.580 Trump had

00:40:52.940 dinner with

00:40:53.420 a Holocaust

00:40:54.080 denier,

00:40:56.480 a famous

00:40:57.020 anti-Semite

00:40:57.900 according to

00:40:58.600 Breitbart.

00:41:01.060 Fox News

00:41:02.020 is shutting

00:41:02.680 Trump out.

00:41:04.320 So Fox

00:41:04.860 News will

00:41:05.460 not support

00:41:06.020 him, which

00:41:07.040 means other

00:41:08.560 Rupert Murdoch

00:41:10.160 assets will

00:41:10.720 not support

00:41:11.160 him.

00:41:12.320 And now

00:41:14.660 Breitbart

00:41:15.060 is gone.

00:41:16.440 Breitbart

00:41:16.720 isn't coming

00:41:17.260 back from

00:41:17.740 that.

00:41:18.300 They're not

00:41:19.020 going to

00:41:19.240 call him

00:41:19.580 anti-Semite

00:41:20.520 and then

00:41:21.480 change their

00:41:22.040 minds.

00:41:22.740 I don't see

00:41:23.520 that happening.

00:41:24.420 Do you

00:41:24.680 believe that

00:41:25.580 Trump could

00:41:26.000 win without

00:41:27.140 Fox News

00:41:27.900 and without

00:41:28.440 Breitbart?

00:41:30.120 Yes or

00:41:30.740 no?

00:41:31.860 Trump could

00:41:32.380 win without

00:41:32.980 Breitbart and

00:41:33.620 without Fox

00:41:34.200 News?

00:41:38.620 Mostly

00:41:39.140 yeses.

00:41:40.000 Yeah.

00:41:40.160 there is a

00:41:44.940 path.

00:41:45.920 There is a

00:41:46.440 path.

00:41:47.640 And the

00:41:48.260 path would

00:41:48.800 look like

00:41:49.460 podcasts only.

00:41:52.100 So if

00:41:52.700 Trump just

00:41:53.140 said he

00:41:53.440 won't do

00:41:53.880 any

00:41:54.100 interviews

00:41:54.480 with the

00:41:55.020 major media

00:41:55.620 and said

00:41:56.820 I'll just

00:41:57.220 do all

00:41:58.780 the podcasts

00:41:59.540 because if

00:42:00.960 you say

00:42:02.160 to yourself

00:42:02.480 but wait

00:42:02.960 nobody's

00:42:03.980 going to

00:42:04.180 watch the

00:42:04.600 podcasts

00:42:05.120 because they're

00:42:05.540 like low

00:42:06.120 volume.

00:42:07.960 No they're

00:42:08.360 not.

00:42:09.220 The podcasts

00:42:09.780 are much

00:42:10.120 bigger than

00:42:10.560 the network

00:42:10.980 news.

00:42:12.300 And anything

00:42:12.880 that Trump

00:42:13.480 does that's

00:42:14.120 an interesting

00:42:14.680 interview will

00:42:16.020 have greater

00:42:17.160 traffic than

00:42:18.840 ABC News

00:42:20.060 would.

00:42:21.880 You don't

00:42:22.660 think I could

00:42:23.180 get more

00:42:23.540 traffic for

00:42:25.140 a Trump

00:42:25.940 interview like

00:42:27.360 if I personally

00:42:28.180 interviewed him

00:42:28.760 on a podcast?

00:42:29.940 You don't

00:42:30.680 think I would

00:42:31.120 get more

00:42:31.580 clicks than

00:42:32.420 ABC News

00:42:33.300 would get on

00:42:33.800 a story about

00:42:34.500 Trump?

00:42:35.540 I would.

00:42:36.800 I would get

00:42:37.560 more attention

00:42:38.900 than ABC

00:42:40.000 News just

00:42:41.020 telling a

00:42:41.440 story about

00:42:41.880 him.

00:42:42.600 So he does

00:42:43.280 have a path

00:42:43.940 and there

00:42:45.660 would be

00:42:45.900 plenty of

00:42:46.320 podcasters

00:42:46.880 who would

00:42:47.280 want to

00:42:48.140 benefit from

00:42:49.380 the traffic

00:42:49.920 so they'd

00:42:50.800 do it.

00:42:51.580 He could

00:42:52.020 start his

00:42:52.440 own.

00:42:53.040 He could

00:42:53.400 start his

00:42:53.820 own network.

00:42:55.300 He could

00:42:55.940 start his

00:42:56.360 own network

00:42:57.000 just a

00:42:58.540 channel on

00:42:59.180 YouTube

00:42:59.580 or Rumble

00:43:01.580 I guess.

00:43:02.540 And he

00:43:04.600 could just

00:43:04.940 interview other

00:43:05.520 people.

00:43:07.240 Imagine Trump

00:43:08.120 running for

00:43:08.720 office.

00:43:09.660 Just imagine

00:43:10.240 this.

00:43:11.540 Imagine Trump

00:43:12.180 running for

00:43:12.680 office but he

00:43:13.900 doesn't do

00:43:14.440 any interviews.

00:43:16.040 He only

00:43:17.100 interviews other

00:43:18.020 people.

00:43:19.560 And that's his

00:43:20.160 campaign.

00:43:23.580 Think about

00:43:24.480 it.

00:43:25.300 He doesn't do

00:43:26.300 interviews.

00:43:26.840 He only

00:43:27.400 interviews experts

00:43:28.580 and Democrats

00:43:30.080 who disagree with

00:43:30.960 him.

00:43:31.780 And that's it.

00:43:32.600 and maybe

00:43:33.080 some rhinos

00:43:33.960 who disagree

00:43:34.440 with him.

00:43:35.920 Can you

00:43:36.300 imagine how

00:43:37.760 much you

00:43:38.320 would like to

00:43:38.860 watch Trump

00:43:39.640 interview his

00:43:41.580 critics?

00:43:43.420 Seriously.

00:43:44.720 Could you

00:43:45.220 avoid watching

00:43:46.540 that?

00:43:46.900 Oh my God.

00:43:50.320 Oh my God.

00:43:52.240 Like it would

00:43:52.920 be so watchable

00:43:53.840 it would just

00:43:54.380 blow everything

00:43:55.200 else out of the

00:43:55.740 water.

00:43:56.840 And as soon as

00:43:57.580 you heard,

00:43:58.020 and by the way

00:43:58.440 here's a little

00:43:58.900 trick.

00:43:59.220 A little trick

00:44:00.620 for you for

00:44:01.220 publicity.

00:44:02.460 This is the

00:44:03.220 most important

00:44:03.900 trick for

00:44:05.040 getting publicity.

00:44:07.000 Nobody cares

00:44:07.940 that you did

00:44:08.420 something well.

00:44:10.280 You can't get

00:44:11.260 publicity because

00:44:12.680 you did something

00:44:13.200 really well.

00:44:14.180 Ah, did a good

00:44:14.740 job.

00:44:15.720 Right?

00:44:16.040 Unless it's

00:44:16.540 like extraordinary.

00:44:18.320 Here's how you

00:44:19.060 get publicity.

00:44:20.360 You do something

00:44:21.180 that other people

00:44:21.940 have been doing

00:44:22.420 forever, but you

00:44:24.060 do it a different

00:44:24.800 way that looks

00:44:26.060 like it could

00:44:26.580 work.

00:44:27.820 That's what

00:44:28.460 Trump could do.

00:44:29.860 You could say,

00:44:30.460 well, the first

00:44:31.420 time I ran for

00:44:32.160 office, I just

00:44:33.480 did every media

00:44:34.720 interview and it

00:44:35.540 was different than

00:44:36.120 the way other

00:44:36.520 people did it.

00:44:37.540 I just sucked all

00:44:38.300 the energy out of

00:44:38.960 the room.

00:44:39.300 Nobody ever did

00:44:39.880 that before.

00:44:41.140 Now you could

00:44:41.840 say, all right,

00:44:42.400 I'm going to do

00:44:42.840 it a brand new

00:44:43.660 way again.

00:44:44.880 And the brand new

00:44:45.620 way is I'm going

00:44:46.460 to suck all the

00:44:47.180 energy out of the

00:44:47.940 major platforms and

00:44:49.420 just starve them.

00:44:50.780 And just make my

00:44:51.800 show the only thing

00:44:52.480 that's interesting on

00:44:53.380 TV.

00:44:54.080 Because it would

00:44:54.680 be.

00:44:55.520 Nothing else would

00:44:56.340 look interesting if

00:44:57.160 he did that.

00:44:58.000 He would immediately

00:44:58.800 make everything else

00:45:00.200 boring.

00:45:01.440 He has that

00:45:01.860 power.

00:45:03.360 Now, what if he

00:45:05.680 doesn't do that?

00:45:07.060 Suppose he decides

00:45:08.140 to be the Trump of

00:45:10.060 the last several

00:45:11.300 years.

00:45:12.080 And he says, I'm

00:45:13.520 just going to go out

00:45:14.180 there and do my

00:45:15.340 thing and I'll do

00:45:16.060 my rallies.

00:45:16.640 parties, I'll post

00:45:19.140 things on true

00:45:19.800 social, I'll accept

00:45:21.720 interviews when

00:45:22.660 they're offered, and

00:45:24.480 I'll just do it the

00:45:25.100 straight way.

00:45:25.780 Can he win?

00:45:27.900 I don't think so.

00:45:29.380 Because you don't

00:45:30.920 realize the extent to

00:45:31.940 which opinions are

00:45:33.260 assigned to the

00:45:33.980 public.

00:45:35.600 It's easy for you to

00:45:36.900 say, you know, I'm

00:45:39.180 never going to change

00:45:40.560 my mind because the

00:45:41.860 media changed my

00:45:42.760 mind.

00:45:43.100 I'm not going to

00:45:44.420 change my mind because

00:45:45.280 somebody else had a

00:45:46.120 different opinion.

00:45:46.660 But that's not how it

00:45:48.420 works.

00:45:49.860 Your minds are changed

00:45:51.440 every day by the

00:45:52.300 media.

00:45:53.540 If the most

00:45:54.480 influential people on

00:45:57.440 the right decide not

00:45:59.880 to back Trump, they

00:46:01.820 have enough influence to

00:46:03.340 take 25% of his

00:46:05.180 support away, which

00:46:06.220 makes him not viable.

00:46:07.780 So it doesn't matter

00:46:09.780 what his base thinks.

00:46:10.780 It matters what the

00:46:11.540 people who influence

00:46:12.780 the base thinks, and

00:46:14.100 I think they've

00:46:14.620 abandoned him.

00:46:16.260 I think they've

00:46:17.120 abandoned him.

00:46:18.700 So, I mean, I have.

00:46:22.040 Like I said, he could

00:46:23.180 win me back.

00:46:24.740 I can imagine that.

00:46:26.520 But at the moment, he's

00:46:28.000 not offering me something

00:46:28.920 I can support.

00:46:30.860 So I don't think that

00:46:32.580 without the most

00:46:34.160 influential voices, and

00:46:36.260 it's not always the

00:46:37.500 people with the

00:46:37.980 biggest audience,

00:46:38.900 right?

00:46:39.460 There are some people

00:46:40.320 who are just

00:46:41.420 influential.

00:46:43.880 Cernovich would be,

00:46:44.900 again, my universal

00:46:46.140 analogy.

00:46:47.360 Like every example,

00:46:48.680 there's like a Cernovich

00:46:49.840 angle to it.

00:46:51.020 I don't know why.

00:46:51.720 There's like, everything

00:46:52.620 has a Musk angle or a

00:46:54.260 Cernovich angle.

00:46:55.240 But Cernovich is, you

00:46:56.440 know, not pro-Trump at

00:46:58.080 the moment.

00:46:59.760 And how much impact

00:47:01.240 does he have?

00:47:02.480 A lot.

00:47:04.180 A lot.

00:47:05.320 You might not notice

00:47:06.340 it.

00:47:06.580 You might not know

00:47:08.140 how he does it.

00:47:09.040 You might not, you

00:47:09.840 know, track his

00:47:10.940 influence through other

00:47:11.900 people.

00:47:12.900 But a lot.

00:47:14.500 Now, by himself, does

00:47:15.800 that make a difference?

00:47:16.540 Maybe not.

00:47:17.680 But there are enough

00:47:18.560 other people who are,

00:47:20.480 let's say, good

00:47:21.980 influencers who are

00:47:23.660 pulling out.

00:47:27.980 Yeah, Cernovich referred

00:47:30.340 to himself as a humble

00:47:32.340 mom blogger.

00:47:33.640 daughter, which is one of

00:47:35.260 the funniest things I've

00:47:36.120 seen.

00:47:37.700 He's a mom blogger now.

00:47:39.580 You know, he's a stay-at-home

00:47:40.480 dad, I guess.

00:47:41.660 I'm not sure if that's the

00:47:42.560 right term, but he's with

00:47:44.860 his kids during the day

00:47:45.780 most of the time.

00:47:47.180 And I've always loved,

00:47:51.100 how much do you love the

00:47:52.080 fact that he had three

00:47:52.900 daughters?

00:47:54.820 That's just the simulation

00:47:56.120 talking to him, isn't it?

00:47:58.400 What are the odds of having

00:48:02.880 three daughters?

00:48:04.240 12%?

00:48:05.820 Am I doing the math

00:48:06.720 right?

00:48:09.880 I thought he had three.

00:48:12.420 Wait, he has two daughters

00:48:13.540 and a son?

00:48:14.940 Oh, is the newest one a

00:48:15.900 son?

00:48:17.740 Oh, how did I not even

00:48:19.420 know that?

00:48:21.320 Okay.

00:48:22.500 Oh, there you go.

00:48:24.040 Two daughters and a son,

00:48:25.120 kind of perfect.

00:48:25.620 Perfect.

00:48:28.400 Oh, good.

00:48:31.660 You know, I love following,

00:48:33.680 even though he's a mom

00:48:35.240 blogger, as he calls

00:48:36.240 himself, his mom blogging

00:48:39.620 is actually good blogging,

00:48:41.640 or good posting.

00:48:43.640 I follow him on Instagram

00:48:44.820 and Twitter.

00:48:45.680 I like the personal stuff as

00:48:47.660 much as I like his political

00:48:48.840 stuff.

00:48:54.280 All right.

00:48:58.400 Somebody says he's a good

00:49:02.000 writer.

00:49:02.480 That's true.

00:49:03.480 He's a good persuasive

00:49:04.940 writer.

00:49:06.280 All right.

00:49:06.640 What else is going on here?

00:49:07.720 Let's see.

00:49:11.120 How many of you have seen

00:49:13.240 the Netflix series

00:49:14.740 Ancient Apocalypse?

00:49:18.180 Netflix series Ancient Apocalypse.

00:49:20.120 I recommend it.

00:49:24.200 So here's my strong

00:49:25.900 recommendation for a super

00:49:28.020 entertaining series.

00:49:30.620 This is the first series I've

00:49:33.120 binge watched.

00:49:34.740 I actually carried my iPad with

00:49:36.800 me from room to room because I

00:49:39.000 couldn't stop watching it.

00:49:40.720 Now, the basic idea of the show

00:49:43.960 is that there are a number of

00:49:46.360 let's see, ancient ruins that

00:49:52.140 suggest that everybody learned

00:49:55.020 from some kind of smart prior

00:49:57.600 civilization that was destroyed

00:49:59.340 after the Ice Age.

00:50:00.980 So let me say it better.

00:50:02.700 The Graham Hancock, I guess, is

00:50:04.980 the journalist who is delving

00:50:08.720 into, let's say, the

00:50:09.700 archaeological domain, and he's

00:50:11.980 getting a lot of pushback because

00:50:13.580 he's not an archaeologist.

00:50:15.540 But he put on a good show.

00:50:17.740 In terms of the production

00:50:18.960 quality of the show, it's

00:50:20.880 really, really good.

00:50:22.380 He takes you into all these

00:50:23.380 ruins that are way better than

00:50:26.000 ruins because you're learning

00:50:27.580 stuff that wasn't obvious to

00:50:29.880 you.

00:50:30.540 But the idea is that there must

00:50:32.860 have been something like an

00:50:34.140 Atlantis and that there were,

00:50:38.220 let's say, building techniques

00:50:40.000 techniques and how to be

00:50:42.200 farmers that was known to some

00:50:46.280 advanced civilization.

00:50:48.660 And then the Ice Age and some

00:50:50.540 major apocalypse happened and it

00:50:53.120 wiped out most of the smart

00:50:54.840 people.

00:50:56.000 But some of them must have

00:50:57.160 survived and were like

00:50:59.540 missionaries that went to other

00:51:01.120 civilizations and taught them the

00:51:02.740 secrets of building monoliths and

00:51:05.480 moving big rocks and how to do

00:51:08.600 farming instead of hunting and

00:51:10.860 gathering.

00:51:11.980 Now, those of you who watched it,

00:51:14.960 did you find his thesis

00:51:17.200 persuasive?

00:51:19.400 Just the people who watched it,

00:51:20.800 did you find his, and were you

00:51:23.560 persuaded?

00:51:25.460 I assume a wall of yeses?

00:51:29.880 I see mostly yeses, but some noes.

00:51:32.600 Some noes.

00:51:33.220 Here's what you need to know about

00:51:38.000 documentaries.

00:51:40.280 Number one, documentary is the

00:51:44.220 lowest level of credibility of all

00:51:46.860 media.

00:51:48.120 Did you know that?

00:51:50.360 If you had to pick one thing to not

00:51:53.040 believe, it should be a documentary.

00:51:56.500 Documentaries are not designed to give

00:51:58.620 you both sides.

00:51:59.420 They're designed to mislead you into

00:52:03.400 thinking that the thesis is the only

00:52:05.980 thing that matters.

00:52:07.580 And do you think they show the other

00:52:08.820 side?

00:52:11.340 Half of the content of this series was

00:52:14.700 the journalist talking about how he

00:52:17.500 keeps being criticized by, you know,

00:52:20.560 traditional archaeologists and that

00:52:23.180 they're closed-minded and they refuse to

00:52:25.320 accept other alternatives.

00:52:27.300 You know what you didn't see?

00:52:30.620 What you didn't see is his critics in

00:52:33.020 their own words telling you what they

00:52:35.580 disagree with.

00:52:38.180 Did you notice?

00:52:40.040 Did you notice there was only one side

00:52:41.920 of the story?

00:52:43.140 If you were convinced it's true because

00:52:46.480 you watched that documentary, you're

00:52:49.240 missing one of the most important things

00:52:51.380 to know about how the world works.

00:52:53.960 The documentary is the lowest of all

00:52:57.040 forms of credibility.

00:52:58.840 There's nothing lower than that.

00:53:00.700 It's the number one least reliable

00:53:03.020 information that is produced by

00:53:06.380 humanity.

00:53:07.780 Now you might say to yourself, Scott,

00:53:09.460 Scott, Scott, fake news is worse than

00:53:11.760 that.

00:53:12.440 No, it isn't.

00:53:13.680 It's not even close.

00:53:15.640 Fake news has a competing news business.

00:53:20.360 So if you want, you can look at the

00:53:21.880 fake news and you can see the other

00:53:24.040 argument.

00:53:24.400 And you can make your own decision.

00:53:26.200 And the other argument isn't hidden that

00:53:28.020 much.

00:53:28.440 Even within our bubbles, you know you can

00:53:30.960 just turn on Fox News or CNN and see the

00:53:33.420 other side.

00:53:34.840 But if you watch a documentary, are you

00:53:37.320 going to go do your own research?

00:53:39.580 Probably not.

00:53:40.900 Probably not.

00:53:41.420 Now, if you don't believe me that a documentary is

00:53:44.620 the least credible type of content, how many of the

00:53:50.240 2,000 mules have you seen lately?

00:53:53.820 2,000 mules.

00:53:55.100 Not one of them came forward.

00:53:57.120 Not one of them caught on film.

00:53:59.420 It was a very, very convincing documentary, wasn't it?

00:54:03.900 It's an example, not an analogy.

00:54:06.100 Examples are good.

00:54:07.840 Analogies are bad.

00:54:08.640 So if I give you several examples of where a

00:54:12.680 documentary was convincing, but it doesn't seem to

00:54:16.100 have been proven.

00:54:17.660 All right.

00:54:18.100 Now, let's say that you're not convinced by that

00:54:20.220 one.

00:54:20.380 You think that that 2,000 mules, maybe it's still to

00:54:23.740 come out.

00:54:24.780 And it might be.

00:54:25.940 Could be.

00:54:26.760 Now, I'm not saying that all documentaries are

00:54:29.860 incorrect.

00:54:30.980 I'm not saying that.

00:54:32.980 Surely some documentaries are totally correct.

00:54:35.440 I'm saying that you can't tell the difference.

00:54:38.540 So if you can't tell the difference, it's the lowest level of credibility

00:54:42.940 at the highest level of persuasion.

00:54:44.960 Because they've got you for like an hour.

00:54:47.060 If I can persuade you on anything and make you pay attention for an hour,

00:54:51.280 I will convince you.

00:54:53.220 Getting you to pay attention for an hour is the hard part.

00:54:55.300 If I can get that, then the convincing is the easy part.

00:54:59.080 So I would say there were many signals of low credibility in the

00:55:06.220 presentation.

00:55:09.160 Many, many signals of low credibility.

00:55:12.060 And mostly the dog not barking situation.

00:55:15.680 You know, the thing that you expect to hear, you're like, okay, you brushed

00:55:18.560 over that pretty quickly.

00:55:20.160 You know, that sort of thing.

00:55:20.980 And so I found it completely non-credible.

00:55:26.260 And I agree with him.

00:55:30.760 And that's not inconsistent.

00:55:33.780 I believe his argument was just filled with things that I'm like,

00:55:37.900 I don't know about that.

00:55:39.720 It's a little sketchy.

00:55:40.880 But his main point was this.

00:55:43.960 That there may have been higher technology back during the ice age.

00:55:49.760 And that we lost the trail.

00:55:52.720 Like, we don't understand why people were building.

00:55:56.340 There's at least one site in his films, in the series, I guess.

00:56:00.920 There's at least one site where everybody seems to agree that they had the

00:56:05.320 building techniques somewhere closer to the ice age, like 9,000 years ago

00:56:11.780 or something, or 12,000 years ago.

00:56:15.900 And that we don't know why they knew it that long ago.

00:56:19.380 That was a surprise to archaeologists.

00:56:22.240 Now, if somebody knew that stuff 12,000 years ago, and then there was a big

00:56:29.000 disruption, which also people agree with.

00:56:32.280 So the two things that he doesn't have pushback on, I think, is that there was

00:56:37.060 that knowledge that somebody had.

00:56:38.960 At least one civilization had the knowledge 12,000 years ago.

00:56:43.140 And then there was this long period, and then suddenly farming just sprung up in one little era.

00:56:51.620 And all of these groups seem to have an origin myth about some kind of smart strangers who knew

00:57:02.260 how to do things that came from the sea and then taught them things and then went away.

00:57:07.000 Like missionaries, yeah.

00:57:10.300 And there does seem to be some evidence that there was a massive flood.

00:57:14.880 So it could be that the stories of Noah, you know, maybe are based on ancient stories that actually had something to them.

00:57:21.920 So here's what I believe.

00:57:22.900 I believe it's very likely there were more advanced civilizations and that some members of them shared their knowledge.

00:57:33.080 And so it did make some hunter-gatherers kind of quickly evolve.

00:57:38.920 I think that's likely.

00:57:40.940 Because I don't think we know much about the past.

00:57:43.880 I think we know about like 5% of the past.

00:57:47.000 That's about it.

00:57:48.100 So could lots be hiding in the 95%?

00:57:51.000 Yeah, sure.

00:57:53.220 But what are the odds that, you know, what are the odds that the exact era that, you know, your humans were in was the good one?

00:58:03.080 Probably it was good, and then it got bad, and maybe it got good again in terms of civilization.

00:58:08.560 That wouldn't be surprising at all.

00:58:10.140 So I think his basic idea that there was something that may or may not have been called Atlantis,

00:58:15.020 that may or may not have been an advanced civilization, is proven because they found it.

00:58:19.400 They didn't find Atlantis, but they found a place with building construction that was thousands of years ahead of what happened later.

00:58:30.600 So I think the case is made.

00:58:32.700 I just don't think, I think he added a lot more speculation than maybe I would have.

00:58:39.240 Yeah, so I think his basic theme sounds pretty solid, but a lot of the specific details he forced into it.

00:58:48.460 Now, what did the media say about it?

00:58:51.400 Can you guess, just a wild guess without looking, don't do any Googling,

00:58:56.340 what do you think the critics said about it other than whether it's true or false?

00:59:00.800 But beyond whether it's true or false, what do you think the critics said about it?

00:59:04.780 Super racist.

00:59:07.580 Do you know why?

00:59:10.320 Because those smart strangers from that advanced civilization were a little bit too white.

00:59:20.960 So apparently the various myths about these smart strangers, they were not brown.

00:59:28.680 The smart strangers were not super brown.

00:59:35.560 Apparently nobody has a story where a black guy showed up and taught them how to farm and build stuff and then left.

00:59:45.700 But several of them have a mysterious, often they're giants, they're tall and stuff,

00:59:51.920 but they feel a little not brown enough for what would make sense for the time.

00:59:57.560 So apparently it's all just a racist.

01:00:02.560 Yeah, they're all bearded men who weren't brown enough.

01:00:08.620 What do you think of this story you're seeing all over the internet, but not in the major news,

01:00:13.280 of these weird rubber-like clots in people who got the vaccination and then died from some reason or other?

01:00:23.960 Have you seen those?

01:00:24.720 You see the doctors, like they're taking the blood clots out of the veins,

01:00:29.820 and like it's clearly something you've never seen before.

01:00:32.260 It's almost like an alien was in the body.

01:00:37.200 Have you seen that?

01:00:38.340 You've seen that, right?

01:00:39.160 How many of you believe that this is a real thing and that there are massive discoveries of rubber-like blockages in people's bodies?

01:00:50.760 I saw a doctor on Twitter debunk this in one sentence, and then I never thought about it again.

01:01:03.360 Do you want to hear the one sentence?

01:01:06.320 Here's the one sentence debunk.

01:01:07.920 I don't know if it's true.

01:01:09.580 By the way, I don't know if the debunk is true.

01:01:12.060 But here's the one sentence from an actual doctor.

01:01:14.140 Every doctor knows that dead people's blood looks like that.

01:01:21.000 That's exactly what a dead person's blood would look like.

01:01:25.480 It's all like this rubbery, clotty stuff.

01:01:28.100 So basically, it's just every dead person.

01:01:29.700 Yeah, just the way it looks, right?

01:01:36.060 Now, I don't know if that's true, but that would be the only reason it's not in the major news, right?

01:01:43.380 You only see it on Twitter and in smaller publications.

01:01:48.000 Yeah, the reason it's not in the major news is it would only take one doctor to say,

01:01:52.040 well, that's the way it's supposed to look.

01:01:53.980 It always looks like that.

01:01:55.180 I don't think the videos where the doctor is taking it, those are not, I don't think those are real.

01:02:04.540 I don't know why they exist, but I don't think it's basically anything real.

01:02:09.700 So even Kim.com, famous internet guy, he believes that this should be looked into

01:02:16.820 because he saw a documentary called Died Suddenly.

01:02:21.640 How many of you watched the documentary called Died Suddenly?

01:02:25.620 I guess that's where this claim is made.

01:02:29.140 And I'll bet if you watched the documentary, you were completely convinced it was true, right?

01:02:34.880 Because you saw it in a documentary?

01:02:38.040 I'll bet if I watched the documentary, it would look completely convincing.

01:02:42.200 So I'm not going to watch the documentary.

01:02:44.860 Because do you know what you've learned if you watch a documentary that's completely persuasive?

01:02:49.800 Nothing.

01:02:50.940 Nothing.

01:02:52.060 Yeah.

01:02:52.340 If you watch a documentary that has lots of facts and it's very persuasive, you've learned nothing.

01:02:59.160 Nothing.

01:03:00.500 Documentaries are not to teach you the truth.

01:03:03.220 They're giving you a narrative, and that's what they do.

01:03:09.320 So if you accepted the narrative that was presented in a documentary, you're not doing a good job of being a good consumer of information.

01:03:19.660 All right.

01:03:21.040 If you haven't seen the whatever is the debunk, how hard would it be to debunk that?

01:03:29.180 All right.

01:03:29.920 Let's do a live experiment.

01:03:32.100 So I haven't done this yet.

01:03:33.360 But if you, here's a good thing to do.

01:03:36.800 If there's anything in the news that looks sketchy, type that thing into a Google search followed by the word debunk.

01:03:45.300 And you'll find it.

01:03:47.120 I'm going to do that.

01:03:48.620 So this is called died suddenly.

01:03:53.320 Died suddenly.

01:03:55.400 And I'm going to say blood clots.

01:04:00.900 Blood clots.

01:04:03.380 What do you think I'm going to find?

01:04:05.060 And then debunked.

01:04:06.460 Do you think that there will be a real good debunk from a doctor saying that this is bullshit?

01:04:11.540 What do you think?

01:04:13.260 Make your prediction.

01:04:14.440 Because I haven't done this.

01:04:15.480 I've never done this.

01:04:16.500 So I'm going to find out at the same time you do.

01:04:21.700 Forbes debunks it.

01:04:25.400 Let's see.

01:04:26.400 BBC.

01:04:28.700 All right.

01:04:31.280 Did embalmers find vaccine-induced blood clots?

01:04:36.000 So here's a fact check.

01:04:37.740 Now, I'm not saying that the person fact-checking this is necessarily believable either.

01:04:43.560 So let me just skim it.

01:04:46.440 That these blood clots exist.

01:04:49.840 They say it's fake news.

01:04:51.560 Fact number one, embalmers do not conduct autopsies.

01:04:57.840 Embalmers do not know vaccination status.

01:05:00.760 Well, I don't know.

01:05:02.020 They might have asked it.

01:05:04.280 Most of his data is not linked to vaccinations.

01:05:07.520 Blood clots are common in refrigerated bodies.

01:05:10.000 There it is.

01:05:11.140 There it is.

01:05:12.380 Blood clots are common in refrigerated bodies.

01:05:15.600 That's the whole story.

01:05:16.460 Now, if you didn't know that I could Google this in one minute and find the debunk, yeah, the rubbery ones.

01:05:28.740 Right.

01:05:32.060 If you didn't know that the debunk would pop up that easily, then maybe you learned not to trust documentaries.

01:05:40.120 Right.

01:05:40.620 Now, I want to be really clear what I'm telling you.

01:05:42.540 I'm not telling you that vaccinations are safe.

01:05:47.520 That's not what I'm saying.

01:05:49.600 How would I know?

01:05:51.200 The only thing I know for sure is I don't trust any information about vaccinations now.

01:05:55.700 I don't, not the pro, not the con.

01:05:57.940 I just don't trust any of it.

01:05:59.380 I don't know.

01:06:00.260 So I'm not even sure I have a, like, I just don't have a dog in that race at the moment.

01:06:05.420 Either way it goes, if I could find out for sure, I would accept it.

01:06:08.440 I wouldn't have cognitive dissonance, because if you told me the vaccinations were hurting people, I'd say, well, not totally surprising.

01:06:18.140 So there's no trigger for cognitive dissonance.

01:06:20.880 And if you told me that they actually work great, I would say, excellent, not totally surprising.

01:06:27.620 So neither of those would trigger me.

01:06:29.500 I'm open to both possibilities.

01:06:31.160 So when I tell you that the debunk exists, what I'm talking about is the credibility of documentaries.

01:06:39.180 The only point I want to make here is stop believing documentaries.

01:06:44.520 Can I ask you to do that?

01:06:46.180 I'm going to ask you directly.

01:06:47.980 I'll just ask you, please, stop trusting documentaries.

01:06:52.760 Now, they might raise really important issues, and they might be totally right.

01:06:58.520 I'm not saying every documentary is wrong.

01:07:00.420 I'm saying that you can't trust them because they were persuasive.

01:07:04.300 If you say, I believe it's true because I saw a really persuasive documentary, you're talking like a crazy person.

01:07:11.280 Stop doing that.

01:07:12.900 I watched a documentary means you've been misled.

01:07:16.440 Get that right.

01:07:17.940 I watched a documentary, almost certainly, 95% of the time, means you've been misled by a professional misleader.

01:07:27.280 It's what they do.

01:07:30.420 All right.

01:07:37.020 And Rob Reiner.

01:07:41.400 I love Rob Reiner because he gets every story wrong.

01:07:47.340 He's like, I don't know, he's some kind of symbol for the left that's perfect every time.

01:07:51.940 Like he captures everything about the left.

01:07:54.560 So he tweeted, Nick Fuentes is an unabashed anti-Semitic Holocaust denier.

01:08:03.220 Donald Trump invited him over for dinner.

01:08:05.600 Enough said.

01:08:07.120 He didn't invite him to dinner.

01:08:10.180 He gets everything wrong.

01:08:11.740 If he had invited him to dinner, it would be a different story.

01:08:16.260 Like very different.

01:08:17.800 If he had invited him, then I'd say, well, that really does tell you everything you need to know.

01:08:23.580 But of course he didn't invite him.

01:08:25.740 Like that wasn't even the fact.

01:08:26.900 But as I tweeted, it doesn't really matter if Trump invited him or not.

01:08:33.200 Because it's like the Charlottesville find people hoax.

01:08:36.460 Now it has a life of its own.

01:08:37.740 And if you think that Trump can continually flirt with being on the edge of being anti-Semitic

01:08:47.100 without actually being anti-Semitic, because I don't believe he is.

01:08:50.400 If you think that he'll have enough support to win the presidency in that strategy,

01:08:57.700 I don't see it.

01:08:59.040 I can't see it happening.

01:09:00.940 But could be surprised.

01:09:02.520 You never know.

01:09:02.980 So if Trump came up with a good fentanyl plan, or even if he ate it, all bets are off.

01:09:11.240 All bets are off.

01:09:12.540 So we'll probably have 300 situations that tell us, my God, this changes everything before 2024.

01:09:20.900 And then we'll find out it didn't change everything.

01:09:22.960 Because there'll be another one tomorrow that changes everything.

01:09:29.520 All right.

01:09:32.980 According to Tim Kass, Nick came with Milo, and Milo is the presumed, yeah.

01:09:40.560 Does that change anything?

01:09:41.680 I mean, if Nick came with Milo, you don't think that Nick was brought along to destroy Trump?

01:09:55.360 Does anybody think that...

01:09:57.020 Now, let's say it was Milo who did the invitation and made it happen and brought Nick Fuentes.

01:10:03.660 You don't think that Milo is smart enough to know that that would destroy Trump?

01:10:09.220 Of course he is.

01:10:11.140 He's not a beginner.

01:10:13.800 Milo didn't start politics this week.

01:10:17.520 He kind of knows how this stuff works.

01:10:19.480 He's very experienced.

01:10:21.060 Yeah, of course he did.

01:10:21.840 So, if you imagine that that was accidental, like, do you think that Milo or Ye, who knows what Ye was thinking?

01:10:30.520 I mean, he might not have even known who Nick Fuentes was.

01:10:33.860 But, we don't know.

01:10:35.640 But, don't you think Milo knew exactly what he was doing?

01:10:40.140 Ye may or may not have known who Nick Fuentes was.

01:10:43.720 Probably did, but I don't know.

01:10:46.940 But, certainly Milo knew.

01:10:49.560 Right?

01:10:49.740 Yeah.

01:10:53.420 Yeah.

01:10:54.680 So, I mean, some of this is more about, you know, maybe the individuals than it is about a big story.

01:11:00.780 All right, that, ladies and gentlemen, concludes the planned part of my broadcast.

01:11:09.080 I'm going to go private over our locals.

01:11:12.800 We're going to close it down just for the subscribers for a few minutes.

01:11:17.100 But, I'm going to say goodbye to YouTube for now.

01:11:20.720 And, I'll talk to you tomorrow.

01:11:21.580 Bye-bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 26, 2022

Episode 1939 Scott Adams： Is The Democrat Party Basically An Ex-Wife？ Hearing A Voice In Your Head

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript