Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 30, 2022


Episode 1943 Scott Adams: Most Of Our Political Arguments Are Conflated. That's My Theme For Today


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

138.48135

Word Count

8,388

Sentence Count

625

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

Scott Adams talks about the World Cup, censorship, and why robots can be free thinkers. Scott Adams is a comedian, writer, podcaster, and podcaster. His work has appeared on Comedy Central, NPR, and the New York Times. He is the host of the podcast, "Coffee with Scott Adams" and hosts the podcast "Scott Adams: The Podcast."


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and congratulations.
00:00:05.200 Once again, you have successfully found the highlight of civilization.
00:00:09.220 We call it Coffee with Scott Adams because, well, that'll be obvious.
00:00:14.360 And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that, well, I don't think any sipper has been to before,
00:00:22.440 all you need is a cupper, a mug or a glass, a tanker, a chalice or a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:28.720 Fill it with your favorite liquid, I like, coffee.
00:00:32.660 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:38.600 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now.
00:00:42.680 Go.
00:00:47.360 Mmm.
00:00:49.460 Mmm.
00:00:50.760 That's good stuff.
00:00:51.780 Well, the U.S. beat Iran in this round of the World Cup.
00:00:59.400 I don't know if anybody watched it.
00:01:01.240 It was one to nothing, which Americans call exciting.
00:01:06.740 Wow.
00:01:07.640 There was one whole score.
00:01:08.800 So the Americans have played two entire rounds of soccer, and so far both teams, well, all four teams involved have scored a total of one goal.
00:01:21.980 So that was pretty exciting.
00:01:24.960 But I have to say the American team looks better than I've seen.
00:01:29.140 I haven't really followed American soccer, but is it my imagination?
00:01:32.920 I watched a little bit, and, you know, soccer is one of my passions, actually, as a player.
00:01:40.400 And when I watched them, I used to watch the Americans, it seems like they would just clear the ball.
00:01:46.280 That's all they could do against the good teams.
00:01:48.780 I think we'll just kick it really far in the direction of the other goal and hope something bounces in our way.
00:01:54.540 But now they actually control the ball and have, you know, they play like the Europeans.
00:01:59.420 So I thought the American team, actually, has gone to another level.
00:02:05.220 That's what it looked like to me.
00:02:07.460 Now, here are two observations.
00:02:10.000 They beat the, well, they tied with England when everybody thought they would lose.
00:02:15.180 And England started by kneeling to their opponents.
00:02:18.480 So England underperformed after getting on their knees before a game.
00:02:26.020 I predicted that kneelers would perform less than non-kneelers, for the obvious reason.
00:02:32.240 And then Iran goes up against the United States, and Iran is playing for their country while hating their own government.
00:02:41.720 How does a team do when they're playing for their country and literally hating their fucking country?
00:02:48.480 The government, not the people.
00:02:51.800 So I think the first two rounds were determined by psychology, not sports.
00:02:59.240 Does it look like that to you?
00:03:01.180 You know, because the elite teams are always going to be kind of close.
00:03:05.160 It looks to me like psychology won the United States two rounds that maybe were a surprise.
00:03:12.020 That's what it looks like.
00:03:12.940 Well, the New York Times says an article that seems to be today that's questioning all of the trans surgeries for children.
00:03:26.560 As Joel Pollack noted on Twitter, quote,
00:03:30.840 Of course, this all comes out after the midterm election,
00:03:34.740 when Democrats ran on the idea that Republicans wanted to take away transgender rights,
00:03:39.760 and Biden and Obama made ads with transgender activists pushing the same garbage propaganda.
00:03:45.620 They trashed science for ideology again.
00:03:49.140 Again, that is exactly what happened, right?
00:03:53.640 This is yet another example of censorship causes the narrative.
00:04:00.340 The narrative causes your opinions.
00:04:05.000 Your opinions cause your vote.
00:04:07.720 Your vote decides who's in charge.
00:04:10.220 Censorship is the only thing that runs the country now.
00:04:12.360 So whoever can use their private enterprise to squelch freedom of speech most effectively, they get power.
00:04:23.700 Because as long as our elections are close, it's never going to be about the vote.
00:04:30.500 If elections are always close, and they seem to be on the national level,
00:04:34.780 as long as they're close, the things that matter will be the rules changes.
00:04:38.940 Maybe in Maricopa, the deciding thing was the reliability of the machines.
00:04:47.380 Maybe. We don't know that, but maybe.
00:04:50.180 And certainly the censorship.
00:04:53.220 But none of this was about voting, was it?
00:04:56.380 The thing that was least important was people's vote.
00:05:00.820 Because the vote was just downstream from the censorship.
00:05:05.900 All right.
00:05:08.940 About 20 years ago, I'm trying to remember exactly,
00:05:15.120 I was at a dinner, private dinner, with some high-level people,
00:05:21.660 and one of them was a famous futurist.
00:05:24.980 Paul, and I can't remember his last name at the moment.
00:05:28.180 There's a famous futurist.
00:05:30.420 Paul somebody.
00:05:31.540 Anyway, Paul sat next to me, and he said that someday,
00:05:38.500 I'm looking to see if somebody knows the name.
00:05:41.040 Maybe. It might have been Ehrlich. I don't know.
00:05:43.040 It was a while ago.
00:05:44.400 But Paul said to me that when robots can make robots,
00:05:49.480 then energy will approach free.
00:05:52.860 Let me say it again.
00:05:53.720 That when a robot can make another robot,
00:05:58.800 then very soon energy will be nearly free.
00:06:02.840 Here was his argument.
00:06:05.120 That when a robot can make a robot,
00:06:07.040 then a robot can make lots of robots, cheaply.
00:06:11.180 And then those robots can go mine the materials that you need to make solar panels.
00:06:16.100 You know, because robots would be better at mining and cheap.
00:06:20.660 Paul Sappho, thank you, thank you.
00:06:23.340 Paul Sappho is the correct name of the futurist who sat next to me.
00:06:29.000 Well, and the argument is that once you have robots creating solar panels,
00:06:36.680 and robots mining for the raw materials for them,
00:06:40.340 and robots creating the robots that do the mining and make the panels,
00:06:44.580 that once the robots are fully embedded in the entire system,
00:06:49.140 the cost of energy would start falling.
00:06:52.260 Now, this, of course, depends on also having battery storage, right?
00:06:56.400 So the robots would be involved in the battery making as well.
00:07:00.360 So here's what's interesting.
00:07:03.540 Robots can make robots now.
00:07:06.520 Here we are.
00:07:08.000 So MIT is, they're working on a concept
00:07:10.940 where they're making sort of almost autonomous smart components
00:07:16.160 that can assemble themselves into another robot.
00:07:20.920 Now, I don't think that's exactly what Paul was talking about,
00:07:24.220 but it's the first step of robots making robots.
00:07:28.860 Because when robots can make robots,
00:07:30.720 that's a different kind of singularity
00:07:32.480 than when AI can be smarter than people and make more AI.
00:07:36.820 So it's another singularity to keep an eye on.
00:07:40.420 I don't know if this prediction is true,
00:07:42.380 but it's interesting.
00:07:44.120 It's very interesting.
00:07:46.860 All right.
00:07:47.340 So robots are making robots.
00:07:50.740 So Apple is having a tough time today.
00:07:53.060 Let's see what their stock is doing.
00:07:55.380 See if they're getting hammered yet.
00:07:58.080 Looks like most things are up except Apple.
00:08:00.340 I don't know if it's because of the news.
00:08:03.880 But the regular market's up a little bit.
00:08:06.320 Apple's down a little bit,
00:08:08.080 contrary to what other things are doing.
00:08:11.400 All right.
00:08:11.720 So here's why Apple's got some explaining.
00:08:16.280 So not only did they cancel the airdrop feature
00:08:19.280 that was necessary for the protesters in China,
00:08:23.340 presumably at the request of the Chinese government.
00:08:25.600 So it looks like Apple was bending to the will
00:08:29.000 of the Chinese government.
00:08:31.420 At the same time,
00:08:32.420 they're threatening to take Twitter
00:08:34.600 out of the Apple App Store,
00:08:37.420 which would pretty much kill Twitter.
00:08:40.220 Now, how do they explain any of that?
00:08:45.700 I haven't heard their explanation.
00:08:49.060 I'm not sure they've addressed those questions
00:08:51.220 directly publicly.
00:08:52.600 But I don't know if any of that's true.
00:08:55.600 Well, I don't know how they'd explain it.
00:08:58.700 So I sat here this morning thinking,
00:09:01.420 you know, I'm just going to sell my Apple stock.
00:09:04.960 I started out with a small amount of Apple stock
00:09:07.900 several years ago,
00:09:09.280 which kind of grew into a bigger portion
00:09:12.200 of my portfolio than I was expecting
00:09:13.960 because it was up like 700% or something.
00:09:17.180 So it's a big decision.
00:09:20.040 Like it would be a substantial financial decision
00:09:22.780 for me to divest from Apple.
00:09:25.120 But as of today, I'm considering it.
00:09:28.120 So I don't want to shoot myself in the foot.
00:09:32.280 Like I don't want to lose money to make a point.
00:09:35.980 But if it doesn't look like it's going to go up
00:09:38.280 because people are mad at it,
00:09:41.160 I also don't want to lose money.
00:09:42.580 So I'm not sure exactly what to do.
00:09:46.440 I hold all of my apples held in my SAP
00:09:49.480 so I don't have much of a tax implication.
00:09:54.780 Yeah, well, we'll see.
00:09:56.300 But I'm thinking about selling all of my Apple stock.
00:09:58.540 If we get confirmation that they...
00:10:03.200 Well, let me put it this way.
00:10:05.160 If they take Twitter out of the app store,
00:10:08.800 I'm selling all of my stock.
00:10:12.280 Let me put that out there.
00:10:14.660 It's gone.
00:10:16.100 It'll be gone within a minute.
00:10:18.880 60 seconds from the time I read that news,
00:10:21.560 if that happens,
00:10:23.520 within 60 seconds, I'm divesting 100%.
00:10:26.080 And that has nothing to do with money.
00:10:29.340 That would not be a financial decision.
00:10:32.000 At the moment, it's a financial decision.
00:10:34.560 So there's some uncertainty.
00:10:36.160 But that would take me out of the financial decision-making
00:10:38.540 and into the patriot mode.
00:10:42.680 Like, at that point,
00:10:43.520 you just have to defend the country.
00:10:45.540 That's not really a financial decision.
00:10:48.220 All right.
00:10:50.020 So Tim Cook's got some explaining to do
00:10:52.340 if he's working for China or working for us.
00:10:57.640 I mentioned yesterday
00:10:58.880 that if Musk made a phone,
00:11:03.060 there's a huge opening for a kind of phone
00:11:05.400 that hasn't been invented yet.
00:11:07.180 An AI phone.
00:11:09.180 Here's what I think the future phone should be like.
00:11:11.780 It should cost you $100.
00:11:13.140 It should have 5G,
00:11:16.160 but not necessarily any Wi-Fi.
00:11:18.840 Probably needs Bluetooth.
00:11:21.780 But basically, it should be a dumb phone
00:11:23.700 that just looks at you and then turns on.
00:11:27.120 So if you lose your dumb phone,
00:11:28.920 you lose it in the toilet,
00:11:31.180 you walk down to any store,
00:11:33.100 you buy one of these generic phones off the shelf,
00:11:36.340 you turn it around and have it look at you,
00:11:38.660 and it pops up with your entire data and features
00:11:42.520 because they were never stored on your phone.
00:11:44.800 They were always in the cloud anyway.
00:11:47.060 So your phone shouldn't ask you for ID.
00:11:49.680 It should just look at you and turn on.
00:11:52.380 In theory, I should be able to pick up your phone
00:11:56.060 and it turns into my phone because it sees my face.
00:11:59.680 And it should have no access to any of your stuff but only mine.
00:12:04.800 And then when I hand it back to you
00:12:06.160 and you hold it up to your face,
00:12:08.000 it's only you.
00:12:10.200 Now, that might be a bad idea
00:12:11.700 because people could, you know,
00:12:14.020 hold it up to people's faces while they're sleeping or something.
00:12:16.600 So maybe that's too far.
00:12:19.080 Maybe your phone needs to be your own phone.
00:12:22.360 But I think that where we're heading,
00:12:25.540 if you didn't know,
00:12:26.760 there's been a sort of a technical back and forth
00:12:33.020 between distributed computing and a mainframe, right?
00:12:39.120 So when the mainframes were cheap and,
00:12:42.380 well, mainframes were never cheap,
00:12:44.240 but when mainframes existed but PCs did not,
00:12:47.960 it was centralized computing.
00:12:50.720 When microcomputers came out, as they were called,
00:12:56.940 then we became more distributed,
00:12:59.200 still with some mainframes,
00:13:00.600 but they weren't doing the work that you were doing at your desk.
00:13:04.260 I think we're just going to go back
00:13:06.060 because now the communication channel is faster.
00:13:10.940 5G is so fast
00:13:12.260 that you don't really need any of your data on your phone, do you?
00:13:16.440 Your phone could just have a browser
00:13:18.100 and the browser could do whatever an app does,
00:13:21.060 but it just does it fast
00:13:22.180 because it's a faster phone and a faster 5G.
00:13:26.040 So speed is the only reason that apps ever made sense.
00:13:29.680 Am I right?
00:13:31.120 From a technical perspective,
00:13:33.820 apps only made sense for speed.
00:13:36.680 But they also created this market,
00:13:39.140 which could be a gigantic market.
00:13:41.360 So there were two reasons you needed it.
00:13:43.080 One was for the benefit of sellers,
00:13:45.480 not for the benefit of the customer,
00:13:48.020 but for the benefit of app makers,
00:13:50.020 benefit of Apple.
00:13:51.840 And then secondly, for speed.
00:13:54.340 But if you don't have a speed problem,
00:13:56.980 5G, faster chips,
00:13:59.080 you don't have a speed problem,
00:14:00.260 then you could put everything on a central server again
00:14:03.980 and the phone itself should be $100 and disposable.
00:14:07.940 Right?
00:14:08.500 So I think that's where it's going to go
00:14:09.920 because economics will just drive it that way
00:14:11.900 unless the monopolies prevent it.
00:14:16.320 Let's talk about dating during inflation.
00:14:18.460 Apparently, Wall Street Journal had an article.
00:14:20.460 Apparently, it's a big thing now
00:14:21.820 where people don't want to go on an expensive date
00:14:27.020 because dinner is too expensive
00:14:28.320 and the difference in income between men and women
00:14:31.540 is now normalized.
00:14:33.060 So men are suggesting that they go Dutch.
00:14:39.500 And, you know, you can both pay your own way.
00:14:43.820 So this is the way the dates go in 2022.
00:14:48.880 Two people are interested in each other.
00:14:50.940 They decide to go on a date.
00:14:54.020 The check comes,
00:14:55.700 and then the modern man says,
00:14:57.600 you know, we both have jobs.
00:15:01.580 We, together, we decided to go on this date
00:15:04.160 and we picked the restaurant together.
00:15:06.180 Let's split the check.
00:15:08.400 Now, the woman, being a modern woman,
00:15:11.000 she doesn't, you know,
00:15:12.300 she doesn't want to not pay the check
00:15:14.700 because she's a full, full citizen, right?
00:15:18.280 Why should she be treated as anything less?
00:15:21.840 So the woman says,
00:15:23.000 I would be happy to pay my half.
00:15:25.260 And then she says,
00:15:26.200 and after dinner, I have a plan.
00:15:28.800 How about after dinner?
00:15:30.340 Because dinner went pretty well.
00:15:32.320 How about after dinner?
00:15:33.700 I'll go back to my separate home
00:15:35.360 and you go back to your separate home,
00:15:37.920 you cheap motherfucker.
00:15:40.200 And that would be the end of the date.
00:15:42.720 Now, that woman would go home to her apartment,
00:15:47.040 drier than November leaves,
00:15:49.560 and we'll never see that man again.
00:15:52.820 So apparently that's dating in 2022.
00:15:54.720 That's the new model.
00:15:59.320 Apparently there are still young men out there
00:16:01.280 who think,
00:16:01.960 if she says yes to sharing the check,
00:16:06.240 home free.
00:16:09.620 Yeah.
00:16:10.520 She said yes to sharing the check.
00:16:12.420 I didn't think I'd get away with it.
00:16:17.540 I think I'm going to get lucky tonight.
00:16:23.240 I love young people.
00:16:26.260 Aren't young people wonderful?
00:16:30.140 Now, young,
00:16:31.100 I feel like you can make fun of the young
00:16:33.760 because we all were.
00:16:35.080 I mean,
00:16:36.560 I'm basically describing myself at 25.
00:16:40.240 You know that, right?
00:16:41.740 I'm describing myself.
00:16:43.700 At 25,
00:16:44.680 if a woman had said,
00:16:45.700 I really prefer to pay my half,
00:16:47.840 I would have said,
00:16:49.100 score.
00:16:50.400 I think I really got a winner here.
00:16:52.300 And then I would wonder
00:16:53.140 why I didn't get any sex.
00:16:54.960 I'd be like,
00:16:55.520 I don't know what went wrong.
00:16:57.020 I just can't figure out
00:16:57.880 what went wrong in this deal.
00:17:02.280 Anyway.
00:17:04.380 That's fun to watch.
00:17:08.260 Here's my theme for today.
00:17:12.680 We keep imagining
00:17:13.880 that we're arguing with each other
00:17:15.780 while we're actually on different topics.
00:17:18.280 Have you noticed how often that happens?
00:17:20.400 So here's the classic one.
00:17:22.680 Should Trump be punished
00:17:24.700 for having dinner
00:17:26.520 with a white nationalist?
00:17:30.700 Fuentes.
00:17:31.880 So the question is,
00:17:33.100 should Trump be punished
00:17:34.600 for having dinner
00:17:35.360 when he didn't know
00:17:36.240 who the person was,
00:17:37.940 the reporting says?
00:17:39.320 Should he be punished?
00:17:40.240 He didn't even know.
00:17:42.840 Okay, you're all on the wrong topic,
00:17:45.320 which is my point.
00:17:47.120 Is that the topic?
00:17:49.000 The topic is not whether
00:17:50.420 Trump is in trouble
00:17:52.440 for having dinner
00:17:54.000 with somebody
00:17:54.540 he didn't know was coming.
00:17:56.320 That's not the topic.
00:17:58.220 See, if you think
00:17:58.920 that's the topic,
00:17:59.780 then the left has
00:18:00.720 completely bamboozled you.
00:18:04.420 That has never been the topic.
00:18:06.260 Well, it's never been the topic
00:18:07.540 since we knew
00:18:08.220 he didn't invite Fuentes.
00:18:10.220 And apparently
00:18:10.800 he didn't know who he was
00:18:11.860 because the conversation showed
00:18:13.520 he had to ask who he was.
00:18:16.300 Now, what is the topic?
00:18:18.780 Can anybody tell me
00:18:19.520 what the actual topic is?
00:18:21.080 Now that we know
00:18:21.820 he wasn't invited,
00:18:22.640 what's the actual topic?
00:18:29.120 Guilt by association?
00:18:31.000 Well, in a sense.
00:18:32.400 Because the topic now
00:18:33.560 is how will it be
00:18:34.440 handled politically.
00:18:36.440 If you're saying
00:18:37.320 logically Trump is free
00:18:38.800 because he didn't know,
00:18:40.360 logic has nothing to do
00:18:41.620 with this conversation.
00:18:43.100 Where does logic come in?
00:18:44.920 Where does common sense,
00:18:47.120 oh, he didn't know he was there,
00:18:48.600 so can't hold it against him.
00:18:50.320 Well, how does that matter at all?
00:18:52.880 In a political sense,
00:18:53.940 it's just a political football
00:18:55.700 that can be used
00:18:57.480 and is being used correctly.
00:19:00.280 Well, effectively.
00:19:01.580 You can argue
00:19:02.340 whether that's correct.
00:19:04.760 All right?
00:19:06.600 But here's the real question.
00:19:09.020 The only question that's left
00:19:10.380 is did Trump
00:19:11.640 disavow Fuentes
00:19:13.500 in a way that makes you
00:19:14.980 feel comfortable
00:19:15.720 that he doesn't agree with him.
00:19:18.940 What do you think?
00:19:20.400 Did Trump disavow Fuentes
00:19:22.460 in a way that would make
00:19:23.840 the average person say,
00:19:26.120 okay, I feel that you don't agree
00:19:28.460 with his point of view?
00:19:31.400 No.
00:19:32.500 And that's the only topic.
00:19:36.160 And do you see
00:19:37.040 the conflation part?
00:19:38.660 If I bring up the point
00:19:40.760 that this is still
00:19:42.100 a topic worth discussing,
00:19:43.920 somebody is going to say,
00:19:45.560 but Scott,
00:19:46.460 he didn't know.
00:19:48.040 It's not his fault,
00:19:49.100 so it'll just blow over.
00:19:50.820 No.
00:19:51.820 Logic has nothing
00:19:52.800 to do with this.
00:19:53.940 And that's not even
00:19:54.820 the point anymore.
00:19:56.140 The point is,
00:19:56.960 did Trump handle it correctly
00:19:58.180 so that we could all
00:19:59.760 feel comfortable
00:20:00.360 he doesn't agree
00:20:01.280 with the points of view
00:20:02.260 of his dinner guests?
00:20:03.760 Of course he did not.
00:20:06.020 Not even close.
00:20:06.840 The closest Trump came
00:20:09.500 is that Fuentes
00:20:11.060 didn't say anything
00:20:12.020 objectionable
00:20:12.780 during the dinner,
00:20:13.820 but if he had,
00:20:15.140 Trump would have disavowed it.
00:20:17.340 That's so far
00:20:18.640 from being adequate.
00:20:21.400 Now here's my,
00:20:22.320 here's where I am on Trump.
00:20:25.020 I'm not going to spend
00:20:26.340 another few years
00:20:27.580 of my life
00:20:28.560 defending somebody
00:20:31.180 who won't defend me.
00:20:35.320 Right?
00:20:35.920 If Trump won't say,
00:20:38.300 I disavow this guy
00:20:39.460 so that my,
00:20:41.000 any association
00:20:41.680 I have with him
00:20:42.540 doesn't pick up
00:20:43.380 that stink,
00:20:44.500 then I don't want
00:20:46.000 to have anything
00:20:46.360 to do with him.
00:20:48.720 Right?
00:20:49.360 Fuck him.
00:20:49.900 Fuck him, really.
00:20:51.120 Like,
00:20:51.560 it's the smallest thing
00:20:52.640 that you ask
00:20:53.400 if you plan to be
00:20:54.640 a supporter
00:20:55.160 or you're even
00:20:55.840 considering it.
00:20:56.780 If you even plan
00:20:57.560 to support Trump,
00:20:58.800 it's the smallest
00:20:59.520 thing you ask.
00:21:00.840 It's the smallest thing.
00:21:02.600 Just do what
00:21:03.240 Marjorie Taylor Greene did.
00:21:04.520 So somebody said,
00:21:06.140 Marjorie Taylor Greene,
00:21:07.580 you went to an event
00:21:09.320 that Fuentes
00:21:11.820 was a host at.
00:21:13.560 You know,
00:21:13.780 explain that.
00:21:15.100 And so here's
00:21:15.760 Marjorie Taylor Greene
00:21:16.840 doing what Trump
00:21:18.420 has not done.
00:21:20.120 And watch how easy
00:21:21.060 this is.
00:21:22.520 This is her tweet.
00:21:23.860 Of course I denounce
00:21:24.980 Nick Fuentes
00:21:25.600 and his racist,
00:21:27.660 anti-Semitic ideology.
00:21:30.940 I can't comprehend
00:21:32.000 why the media
00:21:32.840 is obsessed with him.
00:21:34.820 And then she said,
00:21:35.860 do you actually
00:21:37.380 report real news
00:21:38.380 or just use CNN?
00:21:41.060 Blah, blah, blah.
00:21:41.560 And then have you
00:21:42.160 question Democrats
00:21:42.860 if they denounce
00:21:43.920 Ilhan Omar.
00:21:48.600 Now,
00:21:49.460 that's entirely clear,
00:21:53.460 isn't it?
00:21:54.820 You could ask yourself,
00:21:56.380 did she really
00:21:57.000 not know who
00:21:57.800 Fuentes was
00:21:58.520 when she went
00:21:59.020 to his event?
00:21:59.620 But it's easy
00:22:02.280 to imagine
00:22:02.920 that if you
00:22:03.880 spend a lot
00:22:04.440 of time
00:22:04.880 with online
00:22:06.440 politics,
00:22:07.060 as I do,
00:22:08.180 that everybody's
00:22:09.240 seen what I've
00:22:09.720 seen.
00:22:11.000 And that's just
00:22:11.600 not the case.
00:22:13.220 My understanding
00:22:14.260 is that the trial
00:22:15.740 for Alex Jones
00:22:18.640 in Texas,
00:22:20.200 that a number
00:22:20.800 of the jurors
00:22:22.360 had never heard
00:22:22.980 of him.
00:22:24.480 Can you process
00:22:25.440 that?
00:22:25.780 that there
00:22:27.240 was a jury
00:22:27.780 trial and a
00:22:29.240 number of the
00:22:29.680 jurors had never
00:22:30.400 heard of Alex
00:22:30.960 Jones.
00:22:32.800 So it actually
00:22:34.360 is not that
00:22:34.960 unusual.
00:22:36.580 If it's true
00:22:37.540 that Marjorie
00:22:38.760 Taylor Greene
00:22:39.280 was not familiar
00:22:40.080 with Nick Fuentes,
00:22:41.280 that's not really
00:22:42.100 surprising.
00:22:43.580 That's not
00:22:44.080 surprising.
00:22:45.200 I would call
00:22:45.860 that a coin toss.
00:22:47.940 Right?
00:22:48.640 Like if you said,
00:22:49.420 what are the odds
00:22:50.200 that she does
00:22:51.180 know him?
00:22:51.660 I'd say,
00:22:52.600 I don't know,
00:22:52.920 maybe 50-50.
00:22:53.920 Like he's out
00:22:55.660 there enough
00:22:56.380 that people
00:22:57.560 who are enmeshed
00:22:58.320 in politics
00:22:59.100 have mostly
00:23:00.020 heard of him.
00:23:01.000 But unless
00:23:01.580 you're in the
00:23:01.980 top 2% of
00:23:02.960 people following
00:23:03.560 politics,
00:23:04.180 probably not.
00:23:05.660 I would say
00:23:06.520 Fuentes' name
00:23:08.140 would be familiar
00:23:08.900 before this event
00:23:10.220 to the top
00:23:11.420 2% of people
00:23:13.100 who are following
00:23:13.620 politics,
00:23:14.320 would you say?
00:23:16.220 Not more than
00:23:17.100 that.
00:23:17.920 But I think
00:23:18.340 we're all in
00:23:18.860 the top 2%.
00:23:19.800 Yeah,
00:23:20.820 same with
00:23:21.760 Andrew Tate.
00:23:22.600 If you ask
00:23:23.760 a general
00:23:24.300 person,
00:23:24.920 have you heard
00:23:25.580 of him,
00:23:25.860 they'd probably
00:23:26.400 say no.
00:23:27.260 It's just
00:23:27.680 an internet
00:23:28.060 thing.
00:23:29.480 So,
00:23:31.020 given that
00:23:31.920 Marjorie Taylor
00:23:32.660 Green has
00:23:33.760 what I would
00:23:34.980 consider an
00:23:35.880 acceptable
00:23:36.540 explanation,
00:23:38.580 now I'm not
00:23:39.240 giving her a
00:23:39.720 pass for
00:23:40.220 everything she's
00:23:40.980 ever done or
00:23:41.520 said,
00:23:41.820 I'm just
00:23:42.080 saying that
00:23:42.560 on this
00:23:43.520 one topic,
00:23:44.800 I accept
00:23:45.400 her clarification.
00:23:48.940 Because I
00:23:49.580 don't have
00:23:50.060 counter-evidence,
00:23:51.020 right?
00:23:51.900 Like,
00:23:52.240 I could
00:23:52.860 suspect that
00:23:53.700 maybe she
00:23:54.120 really did
00:23:54.620 know who
00:23:55.000 he was,
00:23:55.740 but I don't
00:23:56.400 know that.
00:23:57.500 And there's
00:23:57.860 no evidence,
00:23:58.580 and it's not
00:23:59.020 obvious that
00:23:59.640 she would to
00:24:00.220 me.
00:24:01.000 So I accept
00:24:01.880 the clarification.
00:24:02.780 How about
00:24:03.040 you?
00:24:04.200 Do you
00:24:04.520 accept her
00:24:04.940 clarification?
00:24:08.920 And here,
00:24:09.860 try to be,
00:24:10.740 try to make
00:24:11.340 your comment
00:24:11.840 independent of
00:24:12.680 what you think
00:24:13.160 of her in
00:24:13.560 general.
00:24:14.980 Yeah,
00:24:15.220 I do.
00:24:16.120 I accept it.
00:24:16.780 All right,
00:24:19.160 but it's so
00:24:20.100 easy,
00:24:20.620 the fact that
00:24:21.140 Trump doesn't
00:24:21.800 do it,
00:24:22.580 puts all of
00:24:23.480 his supporters
00:24:24.080 at risk.
00:24:25.880 Like,
00:24:26.220 Trump not
00:24:26.800 disavowing this
00:24:27.780 guy the way
00:24:28.320 the MTG did,
00:24:30.100 puts me at
00:24:30.700 physical risk.
00:24:32.300 Like,
00:24:32.620 I could
00:24:33.140 actually fucking
00:24:33.760 get killed
00:24:34.400 because some
00:24:35.580 idiot thinks
00:24:36.220 that I'm
00:24:37.380 backing racists
00:24:38.280 because somebody
00:24:40.040 knows somebody
00:24:40.660 knows somebody
00:24:41.300 or something.
00:24:42.160 Because that's
00:24:42.600 what happened
00:24:42.880 last time.
00:24:44.460 I mean,
00:24:44.700 I think I was
00:24:45.260 in actual
00:24:45.840 physical danger
00:24:46.920 supporting
00:24:47.980 Trump.
00:24:49.720 But at least
00:24:50.760 there was some
00:24:51.160 payoff before.
00:24:52.100 I don't say
00:24:52.440 there's a payoff
00:24:53.080 now.
00:24:54.920 You exaggerate?
00:24:58.700 Maybe.
00:25:00.460 All right.
00:25:01.520 So that's
00:25:02.240 what I think.
00:25:02.880 Did you hear
00:25:03.200 that weird
00:25:03.620 story about
00:25:05.080 Biden's
00:25:07.320 Secret Service?
00:25:08.920 They rented
00:25:09.340 some SUVs
00:25:10.540 for his
00:25:11.200 time at his
00:25:12.660 Delaware home.
00:25:14.380 So that they
00:25:15.120 had five
00:25:15.620 rented SUVs
00:25:16.780 and returned
00:25:18.200 them to the
00:25:18.680 lot when
00:25:19.080 they were
00:25:19.260 done with
00:25:19.600 them.
00:25:20.660 And then
00:25:21.260 all five
00:25:21.760 cars burned
00:25:22.840 up.
00:25:24.540 They all
00:25:25.200 caught on
00:25:25.600 fire and
00:25:26.040 burned up.
00:25:27.980 Now,
00:25:28.600 I'm no
00:25:29.320 expert on
00:25:29.960 car fires.
00:25:31.760 But have
00:25:32.300 you ever
00:25:32.620 heard of
00:25:33.000 one car
00:25:33.600 fire starting
00:25:34.540 a fire in
00:25:35.400 the car
00:25:35.700 next to
00:25:36.120 it?
00:25:37.280 Have you
00:25:37.800 ever heard
00:25:38.060 of that?
00:25:39.440 Oh,
00:25:39.660 is that
00:25:39.880 Nantucket?
00:25:40.640 Yeah,
00:25:40.840 I'm sorry.
00:25:41.760 It was
00:25:42.060 Nantucket,
00:25:42.720 not Delaware.
00:25:43.200 So yes,
00:25:45.780 so that's
00:25:46.500 actually a
00:25:46.900 thing.
00:25:47.820 If a
00:25:48.240 car burns
00:25:48.820 up and
00:25:49.640 you're
00:25:49.840 parked,
00:25:50.400 let's say,
00:25:51.520 whatever's a
00:25:52.140 normal parking
00:25:52.780 space, I
00:25:53.660 know, 18
00:25:54.160 inches or
00:25:54.660 something,
00:25:55.560 you're telling
00:25:55.960 me that
00:25:56.280 fire from
00:25:56.940 one car
00:25:57.400 is going
00:25:57.680 to catch
00:25:58.620 another
00:25:58.880 car on
00:25:59.720 fire?
00:26:01.180 I don't
00:26:01.760 believe that.
00:26:03.320 Yeah,
00:26:03.740 okay.
00:26:04.320 I'm going
00:26:04.860 to go with
00:26:05.300 I don't
00:26:05.580 believe it
00:26:05.940 for a
00:26:06.220 second.
00:26:06.460 even if
00:26:10.280 they
00:26:10.420 explode.
00:26:12.580 I don't
00:26:13.100 believe it.
00:26:13.920 Yeah,
00:26:14.080 well,
00:26:14.420 now I
00:26:14.980 saw the
00:26:15.320 cars.
00:26:15.980 If the
00:26:16.520 cars had
00:26:17.060 like exploded
00:26:18.120 like a
00:26:18.700 bomb where
00:26:19.940 there was
00:26:20.220 nothing left
00:26:20.780 of the
00:26:21.040 car,
00:26:21.760 I'd say,
00:26:22.300 oh,
00:26:22.460 yeah,
00:26:22.680 that could
00:26:23.240 catch
00:26:23.500 anything on
00:26:24.000 fire.
00:26:24.560 But the
00:26:25.120 car is
00:26:25.440 sort of
00:26:25.680 like the
00:26:26.500 engine
00:26:26.860 compartment,
00:26:27.620 looks like
00:26:28.080 it caught
00:26:28.420 on fire.
00:26:29.860 I don't
00:26:30.180 see how a
00:26:31.100 fire in
00:26:31.640 the engine
00:26:32.140 compartment of
00:26:32.840 one car can
00:26:34.700 get into the
00:26:35.340 other car.
00:26:36.460 Because there's
00:26:36.960 nothing burnable
00:26:37.640 on the
00:26:37.880 outside of
00:26:38.300 a car,
00:26:38.760 is there?
00:26:40.400 And a
00:26:40.980 car that's
00:26:41.360 not running,
00:26:42.100 it's not
00:26:42.320 going to
00:26:42.560 suck anything
00:26:44.120 in,
00:26:44.640 right?
00:26:46.200 Yeah,
00:26:46.460 and all
00:26:46.720 five?
00:26:48.480 Paint?
00:26:49.120 Tires?
00:26:49.660 I don't
00:26:49.860 know.
00:26:50.240 Oh,
00:26:50.420 tires?
00:26:51.060 Okay.
00:26:52.180 But I
00:26:52.600 don't think
00:26:52.880 the tires
00:26:53.580 were the
00:26:53.940 problem.
00:26:55.400 Maybe.
00:26:57.140 Oh,
00:26:58.340 okay,
00:26:58.960 I got it.
00:27:00.360 The first
00:27:01.080 car blows up,
00:27:02.100 the gasoline
00:27:02.720 goes under
00:27:03.300 the other
00:27:03.620 four cars.
00:27:05.180 That was
00:27:05.780 it,
00:27:05.980 right?
00:27:07.140 It's got
00:27:07.620 to be the
00:27:07.880 gasoline.
00:27:09.640 Am I
00:27:10.120 right?
00:27:12.280 It's got
00:27:12.780 to be that,
00:27:13.140 right?
00:27:14.420 Yeah,
00:27:14.860 that would
00:27:15.140 make perfect
00:27:15.960 sense.
00:27:16.480 Because if
00:27:16.920 the gasoline
00:27:17.440 goes under
00:27:17.960 the other
00:27:18.300 cars and
00:27:18.920 then ignites,
00:27:19.720 there's a
00:27:20.060 fire literally
00:27:21.140 under each
00:27:21.740 car,
00:27:22.280 and then you
00:27:22.820 got it.
00:27:23.140 Okay.
00:27:24.340 Okay,
00:27:24.840 I think we
00:27:25.260 figured it
00:27:25.680 out.
00:27:27.620 I think we
00:27:28.340 figured it
00:27:28.720 out.
00:27:29.480 All right,
00:27:29.720 it was a
00:27:30.000 weird coincidence,
00:27:30.760 but it
00:27:30.980 probably was
00:27:31.480 one car.
00:27:33.140 Although,
00:27:33.640 I'd like to
00:27:34.100 know why
00:27:34.380 that one car
00:27:34.980 caught on fire.
00:27:35.560 All right.
00:27:40.500 Thirteen
00:27:41.120 Republican
00:27:41.660 attorneys,
00:27:42.720 generals,
00:27:43.520 have filed a
00:27:44.340 motion asking
00:27:44.780 the federal
00:27:45.180 energy regulators
00:27:46.120 to prevent
00:27:47.520 Vanguard Groups,
00:27:48.660 that's a big
00:27:49.220 investment company,
00:27:50.720 from having
00:27:51.500 authorization to
00:27:52.440 purchase large
00:27:53.200 quantities of
00:27:54.120 public utility
00:27:55.000 stocks due
00:27:56.620 to its support
00:27:57.420 for ESG.
00:27:58.280 so Republican
00:28:01.240 attorneys
00:28:01.740 generals are
00:28:03.020 going after
00:28:03.580 companies that
00:28:04.360 are even
00:28:04.660 supporting ESG,
00:28:06.580 like it's
00:28:07.000 such a bad
00:28:07.520 thing.
00:28:08.540 So ESG is
00:28:09.340 now literally
00:28:10.080 being treated
00:28:10.840 like a threat
00:28:12.240 to the
00:28:12.620 country,
00:28:13.620 or a
00:28:14.080 virus,
00:28:14.960 or a...
00:28:16.780 It's actually
00:28:17.440 just being
00:28:18.040 treated like a
00:28:18.640 flaw that
00:28:19.320 needs to be
00:28:20.120 removed.
00:28:22.860 So,
00:28:23.660 good on
00:28:24.180 that.
00:28:25.540 Question,
00:28:26.100 did you know
00:28:26.860 that Glenn
00:28:27.280 Greenwald is
00:28:28.100 going to do
00:28:28.480 I guess a
00:28:29.620 major professional
00:28:30.700 nice set show
00:28:33.180 on Rumble?
00:28:35.020 I think it's
00:28:35.980 going to be
00:28:36.240 live.
00:28:36.920 Will it be
00:28:37.600 live streamed?
00:28:39.720 Oh,
00:28:40.600 live show,
00:28:41.040 yes.
00:28:41.380 It'll be live.
00:28:42.800 So,
00:28:43.860 this is one of
00:28:44.520 the most
00:28:44.840 important things
00:28:46.220 happening in
00:28:47.280 the world.
00:28:50.040 Because
00:28:50.520 Glenn
00:28:51.360 Greenwald is
00:28:52.680 a national
00:28:54.140 treasurer even
00:28:54.820 though he
00:28:55.080 doesn't live
00:28:55.480 in the
00:28:55.660 country.
00:28:56.100 And
00:28:57.600 Rumble
00:28:59.600 is a
00:29:00.660 national
00:29:01.060 treasurer.
00:29:01.920 By the
00:29:02.220 way,
00:29:02.480 I'm an
00:29:03.420 investor in
00:29:04.120 Rumble,
00:29:05.000 small investor.
00:29:07.540 But I
00:29:08.300 think what
00:29:08.600 they're doing
00:29:08.960 for supporting
00:29:10.620 free speech
00:29:11.520 is fundamental
00:29:14.320 in its
00:29:15.460 importance.
00:29:16.520 And if you
00:29:16.940 add Glenn
00:29:17.620 Greenwald,
00:29:18.880 who has
00:29:19.420 often the
00:29:20.400 best takes
00:29:21.020 on the
00:29:22.420 corruption
00:29:22.740 of our
00:29:23.180 system
00:29:23.520 in various
00:29:25.040 ways,
00:29:25.700 you put
00:29:27.100 those
00:29:27.360 together,
00:29:27.720 that's a
00:29:28.240 super
00:29:28.700 powerful
00:29:30.100 entity.
00:29:33.320 So,
00:29:33.720 talk about
00:29:34.720 good news
00:29:35.980 coming up.
00:29:38.340 I don't
00:29:40.560 have an
00:29:41.020 investment in
00:29:41.640 everything,
00:29:42.160 although I
00:29:42.500 do have
00:29:42.860 most of
00:29:43.460 my money
00:29:43.760 in the
00:29:44.000 S&P 500,
00:29:45.060 so that
00:29:45.300 covers a
00:29:45.740 lot.
00:29:46.420 But I
00:29:46.820 do have
00:29:47.200 investments
00:29:47.600 in some
00:29:48.160 of the
00:29:48.340 biggest tech
00:29:48.900 companies,
00:29:49.840 because I
00:29:50.460 bought in
00:29:50.940 heavily during
00:29:52.080 the pandemic.
00:29:52.680 that turned
00:29:53.720 down to be
00:29:54.320 such a good
00:29:54.820 long-term
00:29:55.240 strategy.
00:29:57.120 They all
00:29:57.400 went up
00:29:57.720 and then
00:29:57.940 they went
00:29:58.180 down.
00:30:00.500 All right.
00:30:04.460 Musk is
00:30:05.160 dumping on
00:30:05.680 Sam Harris
00:30:06.280 some more.
00:30:07.020 I think he
00:30:07.400 tweeted this
00:30:07.980 once before,
00:30:08.880 but in
00:30:09.660 response to
00:30:10.420 a tweet
00:30:10.780 about Sam
00:30:11.560 Harris leaving
00:30:12.140 Twitter,
00:30:12.620 I guess,
00:30:13.820 Elon Musk
00:30:14.320 said,
00:30:15.060 Sam used
00:30:15.560 to be so
00:30:16.040 rational.
00:30:17.040 There is
00:30:17.420 such a thing
00:30:17.920 as too
00:30:18.260 much
00:30:18.460 meditation.
00:30:18.980 I think
00:30:21.160 he said
00:30:21.480 that before,
00:30:22.100 but it
00:30:22.300 made me
00:30:22.580 laugh the
00:30:23.040 last time.
00:30:23.980 There is
00:30:24.220 such a
00:30:24.540 thing as
00:30:24.820 too much
00:30:25.220 meditation.
00:30:26.400 He destroyed
00:30:27.040 his brain
00:30:27.460 by over
00:30:27.880 meditating.
00:30:30.340 And then
00:30:30.800 he goes,
00:30:31.340 Elon Musk
00:30:31.800 says,
00:30:32.420 Sam lost
00:30:33.000 me when
00:30:33.940 he said
00:30:34.260 that any
00:30:34.740 lies at
00:30:35.380 all would
00:30:35.800 justify
00:30:36.200 Trump
00:30:36.580 losing.
00:30:38.280 And I
00:30:39.540 think a
00:30:39.820 lot of
00:30:40.040 people will
00:30:40.440 lost.
00:30:40.600 I think
00:30:40.880 that's
00:30:41.120 probably
00:30:41.500 why Sam
00:30:42.900 decided that
00:30:43.680 Twitter wasn't
00:30:44.640 a good match
00:30:45.160 for him.
00:30:45.500 Probably
00:30:45.700 that situation.
00:30:47.620 And then
00:30:48.020 Musk points
00:30:48.580 out,
00:30:48.980 that Sam
00:30:50.700 literally wrote
00:30:51.500 a book
00:30:51.960 about why
00:30:53.080 lying is
00:30:53.820 evil.
00:30:56.000 And then
00:30:56.820 he supported
00:30:58.700 lying if
00:31:00.940 it could
00:31:01.200 stop Trump.
00:31:03.300 So,
00:31:03.980 you know,
00:31:04.220 the most
00:31:04.700 rational
00:31:05.180 thinker in
00:31:06.380 the country
00:31:06.860 couldn't
00:31:08.340 stay
00:31:08.980 consistent as
00:31:09.860 long as
00:31:10.200 Trump was
00:31:10.640 in the
00:31:10.860 conversation.
00:31:11.880 That's how
00:31:12.480 much Trump
00:31:13.760 bent reality.
00:31:16.220 All right,
00:31:17.120 let's,
00:31:17.700 we're going to
00:31:18.340 give you a
00:31:18.780 little quiz
00:31:19.620 here.
00:31:20.340 We're going
00:31:20.640 to test
00:31:20.960 your logic,
00:31:23.660 your common
00:31:24.080 sense,
00:31:24.560 and your
00:31:24.800 ability to
00:31:25.280 read minds
00:31:25.880 all at once.
00:31:27.280 So,
00:31:27.880 now this is
00:31:28.420 something that
00:31:29.060 people who
00:31:29.580 stop it,
00:31:32.240 stop it,
00:31:33.360 I haven't even
00:31:34.020 asked the
00:31:34.460 question yet,
00:31:35.240 and half of
00:31:36.340 the people on
00:31:36.800 the locals
00:31:37.200 platform,
00:31:37.960 stop it,
00:31:39.560 stop it,
00:31:40.420 let me ask
00:31:41.000 the question
00:31:41.520 first.
00:31:42.360 Stop giving
00:31:42.940 the answer
00:31:43.420 before the
00:31:43.880 question.
00:31:44.240 stop it.
00:31:48.080 All right,
00:31:48.820 according to
00:31:49.520 Rasmussen,
00:31:50.880 what percent
00:31:51.540 of likely
00:31:52.060 U.S.
00:31:52.480 voters
00:31:52.840 believe that
00:31:55.820 the outcome
00:31:56.900 of the
00:31:57.300 Senate election
00:31:57.960 in Arizona
00:31:58.720 was not in
00:32:01.580 any way
00:32:01.920 affected by
00:32:02.880 the problems
00:32:03.620 at the
00:32:05.060 election?
00:32:05.400 What percent
00:32:06.200 thought that
00:32:06.780 the problems
00:32:07.440 in Maricopa
00:32:08.320 didn't really
00:32:09.520 have any
00:32:10.140 effect?
00:32:10.500 You're
00:32:14.020 right,
00:32:14.740 it's very
00:32:15.720 close to
00:32:16.180 one quarter.
00:32:17.420 I don't
00:32:17.740 know how
00:32:17.940 you do
00:32:18.200 it,
00:32:18.400 it's 23%,
00:32:19.360 but,
00:32:19.740 you know,
00:32:20.320 probably
00:32:20.800 2% error.
00:32:23.480 So,
00:32:25.400 once again,
00:32:26.640 the smartest
00:32:27.220 audience in
00:32:27.980 all of the
00:32:28.420 Internet,
00:32:29.140 you can guess
00:32:29.900 poll results
00:32:31.040 before the
00:32:32.520 polls come
00:32:33.160 out.
00:32:34.560 Okay,
00:32:34.820 a lot of
00:32:35.120 people can't
00:32:35.600 do that,
00:32:36.060 but you
00:32:36.320 can,
00:32:36.920 and good
00:32:38.060 for you.
00:32:40.500 Weirdly,
00:32:43.680 as I was
00:32:44.200 talking about
00:32:44.760 this,
00:32:46.140 how there
00:32:46.480 needs to
00:32:46.780 be a new
00:32:47.140 phone that
00:32:47.780 doesn't use
00:32:48.800 Apple,
00:32:51.540 Jack Dorsey
00:32:52.220 was tweeting
00:32:52.740 that there's
00:32:53.280 an effort
00:32:53.620 going on to
00:32:54.300 build some
00:32:55.300 kind of a
00:32:55.740 web OS
00:32:56.400 where you
00:32:57.480 could have
00:32:57.800 a phone
00:32:58.160 without apps.
00:32:59.740 The phone
00:33:00.240 would just
00:33:00.600 work better
00:33:01.260 with websites,
00:33:03.180 and then
00:33:03.500 you're done,
00:33:04.540 because the
00:33:05.520 phones are
00:33:05.880 faster now.
00:33:07.220 So,
00:33:07.960 like I said,
00:33:08.820 as long as
00:33:09.660 the phones
00:33:09.940 are faster,
00:33:11.100 then the
00:33:12.100 consumer's
00:33:13.480 purpose for
00:33:14.240 having an
00:33:14.620 app goes
00:33:15.080 away.
00:33:16.120 Then it's
00:33:16.520 only for the
00:33:17.180 maker of
00:33:17.680 the app
00:33:17.960 that is
00:33:18.280 good.
00:33:22.400 All right.
00:33:23.460 What else
00:33:24.060 is going
00:33:24.380 on?
00:33:26.780 How
00:33:26.980 about,
00:33:28.260 so,
00:33:30.800 Musk said
00:33:32.440 he's already
00:33:33.020 improved the
00:33:34.080 performance
00:33:34.700 at Twitter,
00:33:36.300 you know,
00:33:36.520 some 400
00:33:38.040 millisecond
00:33:38.760 kind of
00:33:39.160 performance,
00:33:40.080 that if you
00:33:40.520 don't know
00:33:40.780 anything
00:33:41.000 technical,
00:33:41.620 it sounds
00:33:41.900 like it
00:33:42.240 wouldn't be
00:33:42.600 much.
00:33:43.700 But did
00:33:44.280 you all
00:33:44.560 notice that
00:33:45.100 Twitter is
00:33:45.480 way faster?
00:33:48.140 Remember,
00:33:48.660 I kept
00:33:48.940 complaining that
00:33:49.700 if I left
00:33:50.160 Twitter open
00:33:51.320 in a browser
00:33:52.280 tab,
00:33:53.220 that I
00:33:53.820 couldn't use
00:33:54.360 it the next
00:33:54.820 morning,
00:33:55.760 because it
00:33:56.100 would pick
00:33:56.440 up so much,
00:33:57.540 I don't know,
00:33:58.020 just trash,
00:33:59.180 just sitting
00:33:59.540 there.
00:34:00.120 It just
00:34:00.400 wouldn't work.
00:34:02.180 But that
00:34:02.760 stopped a few
00:34:03.500 days ago.
00:34:04.540 Now I can
00:34:05.140 leave it open
00:34:05.700 overnight,
00:34:06.320 and then
00:34:06.800 it's just
00:34:07.140 fine the
00:34:07.560 next morning.
00:34:08.720 And this
00:34:09.320 morning I
00:34:09.660 was using
00:34:09.980 it,
00:34:10.140 it's like,
00:34:10.500 damn,
00:34:10.740 this is
00:34:10.960 really fast.
00:34:11.860 I thought
00:34:12.180 my internet
00:34:12.680 connection
00:34:13.120 was just
00:34:14.160 humming along,
00:34:15.340 and it
00:34:15.620 turns out
00:34:15.960 that Twitter
00:34:16.320 is faster.
00:34:17.780 Now,
00:34:18.120 here's the
00:34:18.580 question I
00:34:19.080 ask.
00:34:20.400 Was that
00:34:20.780 something
00:34:21.160 Twitter
00:34:21.520 couldn't do
00:34:22.000 before Musk
00:34:22.660 got there?
00:34:24.360 Like,
00:34:24.640 what did
00:34:24.980 he do
00:34:25.260 different
00:34:25.640 that made
00:34:27.440 a major
00:34:28.520 technical
00:34:29.200 improvement
00:34:29.900 in terms
00:34:31.080 of the
00:34:31.320 user experience?
00:34:32.740 Do you
00:34:33.300 think he
00:34:33.560 did that,
00:34:33.960 or was
00:34:34.220 that sort
00:34:34.840 of already
00:34:36.440 in the
00:34:36.840 works?
00:34:37.380 Because it's
00:34:37.680 probably fairly
00:34:39.160 major.
00:34:40.540 Fairly
00:34:41.020 major.
00:34:42.660 Yeah.
00:34:44.280 They were
00:34:44.900 too busy.
00:34:45.820 They had
00:34:46.140 too many
00:34:46.500 employees to
00:34:47.700 get it
00:34:47.940 done.
00:34:48.960 Well,
00:34:50.560 so here's
00:34:52.040 my preliminary
00:34:52.780 take on
00:34:53.560 Twitter.
00:34:54.340 Anything we
00:34:55.140 say about
00:34:55.580 whether Twitter
00:34:56.140 is better
00:34:56.820 or worse
00:34:57.260 is garbage,
00:34:58.640 because we
00:34:59.680 need to find
00:35:00.300 out where
00:35:00.920 it ends
00:35:01.260 up.
00:35:02.100 Where it
00:35:02.500 is now
00:35:03.040 is not
00:35:03.600 a snapshot
00:35:05.280 of anything,
00:35:06.180 because it's
00:35:07.260 moving pretty
00:35:08.260 rapidly toward
00:35:09.200 being a new
00:35:09.860 entity.
00:35:10.720 So if you
00:35:11.140 pick it up
00:35:11.520 in the middle,
00:35:12.040 you're not
00:35:12.300 really looking
00:35:12.760 at anything
00:35:13.180 that's real.
00:35:14.020 It's temporal.
00:35:16.000 But we
00:35:17.620 like to see
00:35:18.060 how we're
00:35:18.280 going.
00:35:19.600 I would
00:35:20.220 say at the
00:35:20.600 moment I'm
00:35:21.100 seeing more
00:35:21.760 anti-Semitism
00:35:22.660 online.
00:35:23.660 How about
00:35:23.940 you?
00:35:25.120 It could
00:35:25.600 be because
00:35:26.120 the news
00:35:26.700 stories are
00:35:28.280 generating it.
00:35:29.580 But I'm
00:35:30.180 seeing more
00:35:30.760 direct
00:35:31.400 anti-Semitism
00:35:32.520 online.
00:35:33.400 Anybody
00:35:33.620 else?
00:35:36.900 I'm
00:35:37.420 seeing only
00:35:37.820 no's.
00:35:40.580 Really.
00:35:41.540 So you're
00:35:42.100 not seeing
00:35:42.560 users who
00:35:44.040 are just
00:35:44.340 directly saying
00:35:45.340 anti-Semitic
00:35:46.080 stuff.
00:35:48.820 Why am I?
00:35:50.940 Why am I
00:35:51.740 seeing it?
00:35:52.540 Because I'm
00:35:53.000 seeing a good
00:35:54.080 amount of it,
00:35:55.000 not just one
00:35:56.060 tweet.
00:35:57.900 It's not who
00:35:58.700 I'm following,
00:35:59.380 I just see it
00:35:59.960 in the comments.
00:36:00.620 It's usually
00:36:01.460 just a comment.
00:36:03.400 And it's
00:36:03.740 usually a
00:36:04.160 comment to
00:36:04.620 some generic
00:36:05.540 public person.
00:36:08.760 So you're
00:36:09.360 not seeing
00:36:09.780 it.
00:36:10.920 I wonder
00:36:11.280 how much
00:36:12.380 that is
00:36:12.700 confirmation
00:36:13.100 bias on
00:36:13.760 my part.
00:36:15.000 Because it's
00:36:15.660 less likely
00:36:16.320 that you
00:36:16.700 would all
00:36:17.160 have confirmation
00:36:18.300 bias, right?
00:36:20.040 Could be
00:36:20.720 more of the
00:36:21.680 topics that
00:36:22.360 I've been
00:36:22.600 interacting with,
00:36:23.600 possibly.
00:36:24.780 I don't know.
00:36:26.040 It's an open
00:36:26.600 question.
00:36:26.980 So two
00:36:33.580 of the
00:36:33.820 Oath Keepers
00:36:34.800 were convicted.
00:36:36.680 And they
00:36:37.200 were convicted
00:36:37.800 of conspiring
00:36:41.040 and plotting
00:36:41.620 to take over
00:36:42.420 the country.
00:36:44.900 Now, I
00:36:45.440 didn't follow
00:36:45.940 the trial,
00:36:47.660 but did you
00:36:48.300 know that
00:36:48.680 conspiring and
00:36:49.580 plotting are
00:36:50.140 illegal?
00:36:50.500 At what
00:36:55.000 point does
00:36:56.380 talking about
00:36:57.060 stuff become
00:36:57.800 illegal?
00:36:59.520 Like, if
00:37:01.460 all of the
00:37:02.560 conspiring
00:37:03.160 happened within
00:37:04.000 their organization
00:37:05.000 and then
00:37:06.500 nobody put
00:37:07.940 it into
00:37:08.340 operation,
00:37:10.300 it's not
00:37:11.880 something I'm
00:37:12.440 comfortable with
00:37:13.420 happening,
00:37:15.460 but where is
00:37:16.240 the crime?
00:37:17.800 Where is
00:37:18.140 the crime?
00:37:18.540 How much
00:37:20.360 did they have
00:37:20.800 to stretch
00:37:21.260 the Constitution
00:37:22.100 or the law
00:37:23.720 to put a
00:37:24.440 crime around
00:37:24.980 that?
00:37:26.260 Because to
00:37:26.720 me, I
00:37:27.080 thought a
00:37:28.120 bunch of
00:37:28.500 guys sitting
00:37:29.240 in a room
00:37:29.760 talking shit
00:37:30.520 about anything
00:37:32.480 is legal.
00:37:34.280 It's not.
00:37:35.740 You can't
00:37:36.320 talk shit
00:37:36.760 about stuff
00:37:37.360 without getting
00:37:38.360 arrested if
00:37:39.500 it's the wrong
00:37:39.960 stuff.
00:37:40.960 I thought
00:37:41.580 talking was
00:37:42.220 always legal.
00:37:43.840 Like, how
00:37:44.500 much of the
00:37:45.640 plan has to
00:37:46.320 be implemented
00:37:47.060 short of a
00:37:49.180 crime being
00:37:49.680 committed
00:37:50.060 before that
00:37:51.940 talking becomes
00:37:52.860 a crime
00:37:53.300 itself.
00:37:54.460 I don't
00:37:55.060 understand
00:37:55.640 exactly the
00:37:56.440 situation, but
00:37:57.060 I'm not
00:37:57.340 comfortable with
00:37:57.960 it.
00:37:58.700 So it's not a
00:38:00.140 situation that I
00:38:00.940 look at and
00:38:01.400 say, oh,
00:38:02.600 justice was
00:38:03.440 served.
00:38:04.900 Now, just to
00:38:05.720 be clear, I
00:38:07.100 don't want the
00:38:07.760 Oath Keepers
00:38:08.360 trying to
00:38:08.840 overthrow the
00:38:10.120 government, but
00:38:11.840 I don't think
00:38:12.340 that ever was
00:38:12.980 happening.
00:38:13.300 I see no
00:38:16.020 evidence that
00:38:16.660 they meant
00:38:17.080 that.
00:38:18.120 All evidence
00:38:18.780 suggests that
00:38:19.580 they did mean
00:38:20.300 to delay the
00:38:21.280 certification.
00:38:23.420 Where was the
00:38:24.240 evidence that
00:38:24.700 they planned to
00:38:25.180 take over the
00:38:25.720 government?
00:38:27.420 If the only
00:38:28.280 thing they were
00:38:28.700 doing was
00:38:29.160 delaying a
00:38:29.900 process to
00:38:30.560 improve the
00:38:31.260 result, it
00:38:33.380 doesn't look
00:38:33.860 like justice
00:38:34.380 to me, but
00:38:35.700 I don't know
00:38:36.160 if there's,
00:38:37.800 the reporting
00:38:38.640 didn't tell me
00:38:39.300 what it was
00:38:39.840 exactly they
00:38:40.500 did that was
00:38:40.920 so bad.
00:38:41.360 Now, obviously
00:38:44.680 it's so bad
00:38:45.320 from a logical
00:38:47.100 level, but it
00:38:47.740 has to be bad
00:38:48.400 illegal, too,
00:38:50.120 to go to
00:38:50.580 jail.
00:38:55.340 So, we'll
00:38:56.240 watch that.
00:38:57.020 Rhodes and
00:38:57.540 Megs, two
00:38:58.380 people who got
00:38:58.880 convicted, 20
00:39:00.200 year maximum
00:39:00.840 prison sentence
00:39:01.700 on the charge
00:39:03.020 of seditious
00:39:03.900 conspiracy.
00:39:07.360 I just
00:39:08.500 doubt that
00:39:09.160 that was
00:39:09.540 justice.
00:39:10.400 I don't
00:39:10.760 know.
00:39:11.360 But given
00:39:12.420 everything we
00:39:13.200 know about
00:39:13.600 everything, I
00:39:14.200 just doubt
00:39:14.760 that justice
00:39:15.580 was served.
00:39:18.240 All right.
00:39:18.840 So, I guess
00:39:19.720 the Respect
00:39:20.420 for Marriage
00:39:20.980 Act looks
00:39:21.680 like it's
00:39:22.420 passed.
00:39:24.180 And I
00:39:25.380 guess I was
00:39:25.960 blind to the
00:39:26.780 fact that if
00:39:28.320 you were legally
00:39:29.040 married in one
00:39:29.820 state and you
00:39:30.480 moved to another
00:39:31.040 state, you
00:39:31.640 wouldn't be
00:39:32.040 legally married.
00:39:33.500 Let's say it's
00:39:34.260 a gay marriage.
00:39:35.520 Did you know
00:39:36.020 that?
00:39:36.240 I didn't know
00:39:38.540 that the states
00:39:39.760 did not
00:39:40.320 recognize a
00:39:41.820 legal marriage
00:39:42.420 from another
00:39:42.980 state.
00:39:44.820 So, I'm
00:39:46.000 actually glad
00:39:46.680 that they
00:39:47.000 made this
00:39:47.440 consistent.
00:39:48.860 Does anybody
00:39:49.360 have a problem
00:39:49.860 with that?
00:39:51.060 Because I
00:39:51.720 think this is
00:39:52.200 just a
00:39:52.620 technical fix
00:39:53.560 to something
00:39:55.200 that I
00:39:55.560 thought I
00:39:55.820 should have
00:39:56.040 done in the
00:39:56.380 first place.
00:40:01.600 Theory.
00:40:02.080 think it's
00:40:03.800 wrong?
00:40:06.400 You think it's
00:40:07.060 fed overreach
00:40:07.880 because the
00:40:08.460 states...
00:40:10.200 No, you
00:40:10.720 know, but
00:40:11.220 there's a...
00:40:12.280 Let's see if
00:40:14.040 there's an
00:40:14.360 analog to this.
00:40:15.540 There are other
00:40:16.420 laws that work
00:40:18.680 for other
00:40:19.160 states, right?
00:40:19.920 If I get a
00:40:20.580 driver's license in
00:40:21.540 one state, I can
00:40:22.460 use it in another
00:40:23.120 state.
00:40:23.500 Is that a
00:40:23.880 federal law or
00:40:25.120 did every state
00:40:26.020 agree to that?
00:40:27.660 Give me a fact
00:40:28.300 check.
00:40:28.600 Why is it
00:40:30.100 that my
00:40:30.400 driver's license
00:40:31.120 is valid in
00:40:31.860 another state?
00:40:33.060 Because every
00:40:33.860 state agreed or
00:40:34.780 it's a federal
00:40:35.340 law?
00:40:37.260 States agreed.
00:40:38.840 Do you
00:40:39.040 think?
00:40:39.280 Every state.
00:40:42.140 Yeah.
00:40:43.320 Constitution
00:40:43.820 requires it
00:40:44.780 because it
00:40:45.200 would be
00:40:45.620 different
00:40:46.380 treatment or
00:40:46.900 something?
00:40:49.880 I don't
00:40:50.480 know.
00:40:52.080 So we
00:40:52.740 actually got
00:40:53.200 all 50
00:40:53.720 states to
00:40:54.200 agree to
00:40:54.520 that.
00:40:56.040 Maybe.
00:40:58.100 Yeah,
00:40:58.580 maybe that
00:40:58.980 would be a
00:40:59.360 better way
00:40:59.680 to go,
00:41:00.140 wouldn't it?
00:41:01.680 But I
00:41:02.760 think I
00:41:03.300 agree with
00:41:03.680 the federal
00:41:04.080 government in
00:41:04.920 this case.
00:41:06.100 I like the
00:41:06.940 federal government
00:41:07.520 stepping in when
00:41:08.880 there's something
00:41:09.440 about the
00:41:10.340 situation that
00:41:11.800 makes it not a
00:41:12.600 good fit for
00:41:13.140 the states.
00:41:14.840 Right?
00:41:15.200 And I think
00:41:15.740 that a
00:41:18.040 basic appeal
00:41:18.880 to justice
00:41:19.700 required the
00:41:21.320 federal government
00:41:21.940 to do this.
00:41:24.960 Because no
00:41:25.900 matter what you
00:41:26.400 think of gay
00:41:26.920 marriage, you
00:41:28.040 have to know
00:41:28.580 it's fucked
00:41:29.080 up to let
00:41:29.920 them get
00:41:30.260 married and
00:41:31.300 then suddenly
00:41:31.840 treat them
00:41:32.340 like they're
00:41:32.740 unmarried because
00:41:33.520 they move
00:41:34.020 across, if
00:41:35.320 they move
00:41:35.660 five miles in
00:41:36.380 America,
00:41:37.060 right?
00:41:37.760 Just because
00:41:38.220 you moved
00:41:38.560 over a state
00:41:39.080 border, suddenly
00:41:40.160 you're not
00:41:40.520 married.
00:41:42.420 Do you think
00:41:43.300 that's good for
00:41:43.920 anything?
00:41:45.080 Like, who
00:41:45.640 benefits from
00:41:46.460 that?
00:41:47.340 There's no
00:41:47.860 benefit from
00:41:48.480 that.
00:41:49.500 Nobody wins
00:41:50.280 from that.
00:41:51.800 Because we're
00:41:52.440 not going
00:41:52.800 backwards.
00:41:53.200 If you
00:41:54.760 thought that
00:41:55.100 was the
00:41:55.400 beginning of
00:41:56.000 oh, now
00:41:57.340 I'll dismantle
00:41:58.260 these gay
00:41:58.860 marriages, it's
00:41:59.680 just the
00:42:00.060 beginning.
00:42:00.940 It's not.
00:42:02.820 Gay
00:42:03.300 marriage isn't
00:42:03.840 going to be
00:42:04.120 dismantled.
00:42:04.820 It's here to
00:42:05.240 stay.
00:42:06.660 And so
00:42:08.680 you might as
00:42:09.380 well be decent
00:42:10.100 to people,
00:42:11.400 right?
00:42:12.780 I get the
00:42:13.800 conceptual
00:42:15.320 argument,
00:42:16.940 you know,
00:42:17.180 states'
00:42:17.560 rights.
00:42:17.740 States'
00:42:17.880 rights is
00:42:19.280 always a
00:42:19.660 strong argument.
00:42:21.300 Just whatever
00:42:22.080 the topic,
00:42:22.620 it's always
00:42:22.920 a strong
00:42:23.300 argument.
00:42:24.560 But I
00:42:25.080 think you
00:42:25.400 have to
00:42:25.780 put the
00:42:26.360 individuals
00:42:27.040 above that
00:42:28.780 little
00:42:29.200 peculiarity of
00:42:31.280 our Constitution.
00:42:32.980 It's a
00:42:33.200 peculiarity, but
00:42:34.320 it's a good
00:42:34.700 one.
00:42:37.940 The conflict
00:42:38.840 between states
00:42:40.060 was gay
00:42:40.560 marriage, not
00:42:41.220 heterosexual.
00:42:42.780 Right.
00:42:43.800 But I'm
00:42:45.620 only talking
00:42:46.080 about the
00:42:46.380 gay marriages.
00:42:50.540 Yeah,
00:42:51.140 states'
00:42:51.400 rights
00:42:51.680 facilitate
00:42:52.380 A-B
00:42:52.740 testing.
00:42:53.860 But don't
00:42:54.380 you think
00:42:54.680 gay rights
00:42:55.220 has been
00:42:55.600 A-B
00:42:55.880 tested?
00:42:58.240 All right,
00:42:58.900 I live in
00:42:59.340 California and
00:43:00.120 we've had
00:43:00.500 gay marriage
00:43:01.120 for a long
00:43:01.620 time.
00:43:03.280 I can
00:43:04.020 identify
00:43:04.700 zero
00:43:06.020 downside
00:43:06.560 from that.
00:43:08.260 Zero.
00:43:09.080 I'm not
00:43:09.460 aware of
00:43:10.300 any downside.
00:43:12.620 Now,
00:43:13.220 is there
00:43:13.820 an upside?
00:43:14.800 Yes.
00:43:15.700 There's an
00:43:16.180 extreme upside
00:43:16.980 for the people
00:43:17.700 involved and
00:43:18.380 anybody who
00:43:18.780 cares about
00:43:19.200 them.
00:43:19.980 Extreme
00:43:20.380 upside.
00:43:20.760 for the
00:43:21.820 people
00:43:22.060 involved and
00:43:23.460 their loved
00:43:24.020 ones.
00:43:24.980 But I've
00:43:25.820 not seen
00:43:26.320 one negative
00:43:27.560 thing.
00:43:29.200 Have you?
00:43:31.820 I've not
00:43:32.440 seen one
00:43:32.960 negative thing.
00:43:34.580 Why is polygamy
00:43:35.380 illegal?
00:43:36.700 Well, it's
00:43:37.460 not really
00:43:38.800 illegal.
00:43:40.320 Polygamy is
00:43:41.460 sort of illegal,
00:43:42.460 but not
00:43:42.900 really.
00:43:43.360 I mean,
00:43:44.600 the polygamy
00:43:47.000 is the
00:43:48.460 legal part
00:43:49.060 of the
00:43:49.240 marriage.
00:43:50.120 Yeah,
00:43:50.360 you know,
00:43:50.580 polygamy should
00:43:51.200 be legal.
00:43:52.900 But that's
00:43:53.200 another story
00:43:54.220 for another
00:43:54.680 day.
00:43:56.140 All right.
00:43:58.040 What else
00:43:58.840 is going
00:43:59.100 on?
00:44:00.780 So,
00:44:01.500 Ye and
00:44:01.980 Kim Kardashian,
00:44:02.880 their divorce is
00:44:03.540 final,
00:44:04.000 says the
00:44:04.360 news,
00:44:04.880 and the
00:44:05.720 settlement is
00:44:06.460 that Ye
00:44:07.620 has to pay
00:44:08.220 $200,000 a
00:44:09.700 month in
00:44:10.060 child support.
00:44:10.640 Now,
00:44:12.920 my understanding
00:44:13.640 is that
00:44:14.340 Kim has
00:44:15.340 the primary
00:44:16.480 custody,
00:44:18.080 which means
00:44:19.980 that she
00:44:20.300 would be
00:44:20.600 putting in
00:44:21.060 her own
00:44:21.380 money,
00:44:21.900 right?
00:44:22.400 So,
00:44:22.820 I don't
00:44:23.700 think that
00:44:24.080 they settle
00:44:24.540 these with
00:44:25.180 100% of
00:44:26.560 the payment
00:44:27.060 comes from
00:44:28.020 the one
00:44:28.880 who doesn't
00:44:29.360 have custody,
00:44:30.900 right?
00:44:31.420 So,
00:44:31.960 if one
00:44:32.360 side was
00:44:33.360 ordered to
00:44:33.780 pay $200,000,
00:44:35.420 there's sort
00:44:35.920 of an
00:44:36.360 implied
00:44:36.940 doubling of
00:44:38.340 that,
00:44:38.680 which is
00:44:38.900 what the
00:44:39.220 kids cost.
00:44:40.640 So,
00:44:41.440 $400,000
00:44:42.220 per month
00:44:44.080 is what
00:44:45.440 the
00:44:46.100 Kardashian
00:44:46.600 lawyer has
00:44:47.240 sold to
00:44:48.340 the court
00:44:48.780 as the
00:44:49.280 right number.
00:44:50.820 $400,000
00:44:52.040 per month.
00:44:57.180 And maybe
00:44:57.980 it is,
00:44:58.500 I don't know.
00:44:59.440 But,
00:45:00.440 it seems
00:45:02.560 to me
00:45:02.980 if the
00:45:03.660 Oh,
00:45:08.120 man.
00:45:08.520 All right,
00:45:10.320 so this
00:45:10.640 is too
00:45:10.960 personal
00:45:11.340 to me.
00:45:13.840 I'm too
00:45:14.500 recently
00:45:14.960 divorced
00:45:15.580 to handle
00:45:16.220 this case
00:45:17.080 because I'm
00:45:17.900 just going
00:45:18.200 to go off
00:45:18.740 on Kim
00:45:19.520 Kardashian
00:45:20.020 now.
00:45:21.020 Does anybody
00:45:21.360 mind that?
00:45:23.740 I'm just
00:45:24.340 going to
00:45:24.540 really go
00:45:24.920 off on
00:45:25.260 her right
00:45:25.540 now.
00:45:26.980 And I'll
00:45:28.280 start by
00:45:28.720 saying that
00:45:29.220 I've always
00:45:29.760 been a huge
00:45:30.320 fan of
00:45:30.760 hers.
00:45:31.420 I've never
00:45:31.880 been on
00:45:32.480 the side
00:45:32.820 of saying,
00:45:33.680 oh,
00:45:33.860 she just
00:45:34.380 has fun
00:45:35.160 and doesn't
00:45:36.320 work.
00:45:37.060 No,
00:45:37.360 she works
00:45:37.760 really hard
00:45:38.560 and she's
00:45:39.700 very smart.
00:45:40.940 She's very
00:45:41.440 entrepreneurial.
00:45:42.680 She seems
00:45:43.200 very giving.
00:45:44.200 She seems
00:45:44.620 very generous.
00:45:45.800 And I have
00:45:46.600 like tons
00:45:47.300 of good
00:45:47.700 things to
00:45:48.140 say about
00:45:48.580 her.
00:45:50.340 However,
00:45:52.900 however,
00:45:55.120 if somebody
00:45:57.080 puts the
00:45:57.940 final divorce
00:45:59.160 agreement in
00:45:59.940 front of
00:46:00.280 you,
00:46:00.480 and you
00:46:02.580 know that
00:46:03.060 in the
00:46:03.360 last two
00:46:03.900 weeks,
00:46:05.940 your
00:46:06.300 husband,
00:46:07.120 soon to
00:46:07.420 be ex-husband,
00:46:08.680 had lost
00:46:09.380 nearly all
00:46:10.780 of his
00:46:11.100 fortune,
00:46:12.140 or his
00:46:12.460 future fortune,
00:46:14.480 would you
00:46:14.900 sign that
00:46:15.360 thing?
00:46:17.900 These are
00:46:18.860 two people
00:46:19.280 who had
00:46:19.480 babies
00:46:19.880 together.
00:46:21.900 They had
00:46:22.180 children
00:46:22.440 together and
00:46:23.160 presumably
00:46:23.860 still want
00:46:24.420 to be in
00:46:24.740 each other's
00:46:25.180 life for
00:46:25.580 that.
00:46:27.540 And
00:46:27.880 after
00:46:29.540 Kanye's
00:46:30.380 entire
00:46:30.840 fortune gets
00:46:31.920 destroyed,
00:46:33.580 this
00:46:34.340 fucking
00:46:34.920 cunt
00:46:35.560 signed that
00:46:37.040 agreement
00:46:37.500 because she
00:46:38.720 could.
00:46:39.860 Just because
00:46:40.520 she could.
00:46:41.480 There was no
00:46:41.940 legal reason
00:46:43.060 she couldn't.
00:46:43.880 And if
00:46:44.420 Ye agreed to
00:46:45.380 it, he
00:46:46.420 agreed to
00:46:46.800 it.
00:46:47.140 He probably
00:46:47.520 had to
00:46:47.820 sign it
00:46:48.140 too.
00:46:49.420 But
00:46:49.680 that is
00:46:53.040 so below
00:46:54.900 the level
00:46:56.440 of a good
00:46:57.740 human being
00:46:58.480 that my
00:47:00.000 head's going
00:47:00.400 to explode.
00:47:02.820 Now, we
00:47:03.640 don't know
00:47:04.100 all the
00:47:04.520 details, and
00:47:05.300 if Ye is
00:47:05.860 happy with
00:47:06.440 the arrangement,
00:47:07.220 that's the
00:47:07.760 end of the
00:47:08.140 story.
00:47:09.160 So let me
00:47:09.620 say this.
00:47:10.640 If Ye is
00:47:11.440 okay with
00:47:11.960 it, that's
00:47:14.120 the end of
00:47:14.460 the story,
00:47:15.020 because it's
00:47:15.660 just up to
00:47:16.200 them.
00:47:16.960 I would
00:47:17.580 have no
00:47:17.940 complaint.
00:47:18.960 If he
00:47:19.520 doesn't
00:47:19.820 complain about
00:47:20.380 it, I
00:47:20.580 have no
00:47:20.860 complaint about
00:47:21.540 anybody.
00:47:22.300 It's just
00:47:22.680 their decision.
00:47:23.220 But, if
00:47:26.380 he's thinking
00:47:26.880 the same
00:47:27.320 thing I
00:47:27.740 am, which
00:47:29.160 is, you
00:47:29.680 just watched
00:47:30.220 my entire
00:47:30.820 fortune get
00:47:31.780 destroyed right
00:47:32.580 in front of
00:47:32.980 you, and
00:47:33.560 you fucking
00:47:33.960 signed that
00:47:34.520 thing.
00:47:35.820 Like, the
00:47:36.400 thing was
00:47:36.740 obviously
00:47:37.140 negotiated
00:47:37.800 before Kanye
00:47:39.260 lost his
00:47:39.820 money, right?
00:47:40.980 Obviously.
00:47:41.640 Now, presumably,
00:47:43.320 he's retained
00:47:43.880 many millions,
00:47:45.220 no matter what
00:47:45.660 happens.
00:47:46.260 But still, it's
00:47:48.040 a whole different
00:47:48.720 situation.
00:47:49.260 If that
00:47:50.100 wasn't
00:47:51.260 renegotiated,
00:47:52.860 that's just
00:47:54.420 a crime.
00:47:56.080 Like, that's
00:47:56.640 just lawyers
00:47:57.460 stealing shit.
00:47:58.380 I mean, that's
00:47:58.760 terrible.
00:48:01.340 I mean, I
00:48:02.000 really have a
00:48:02.720 visceral feeling
00:48:03.780 of hatred for
00:48:04.760 Kim Kardashian
00:48:06.220 because of
00:48:07.240 this.
00:48:07.700 Now, it's
00:48:08.000 not fair,
00:48:09.120 let me say as
00:48:09.920 clearly as
00:48:10.480 possible,
00:48:11.860 especially when
00:48:12.880 a divorce is
00:48:13.580 involved.
00:48:14.200 Believe me, I
00:48:14.720 know this, the
00:48:16.200 public doesn't
00:48:16.800 know what's
00:48:17.100 going on.
00:48:17.720 we're dealing
00:48:19.720 with this, you
00:48:20.540 know, minor
00:48:20.980 little information
00:48:21.800 that, you
00:48:22.340 know, slips
00:48:22.760 out.
00:48:23.560 We don't
00:48:23.920 know the
00:48:24.240 context, right?
00:48:26.460 I mean, tomorrow
00:48:28.120 we can find out
00:48:29.000 that Kanye
00:48:29.540 borrowed a
00:48:30.300 billion dollars
00:48:30.980 from Kim
00:48:31.520 Kardashian and
00:48:32.320 didn't pay it
00:48:32.840 back, and so
00:48:33.860 you say, oh,
00:48:34.480 well, now that
00:48:35.440 you know that
00:48:35.840 context, it all
00:48:36.540 makes sense, or
00:48:37.400 something like
00:48:37.780 that, right?
00:48:38.660 So, there
00:48:39.380 could be more
00:48:39.940 to it, but on
00:48:41.540 the surface, it
00:48:42.520 disgusts me.
00:48:44.820 But I could
00:48:45.620 change my mind
00:48:46.200 if I found out
00:48:46.820 something different.
00:48:47.720 All right, here's
00:48:49.820 the last thing I
00:48:51.080 want to do is
00:48:51.580 talk about masks.
00:48:52.500 I'm going to
00:48:52.800 talk about not
00:48:54.020 whether they
00:48:54.520 work or not.
00:48:55.700 I'm going to
00:48:56.200 talk about the
00:48:56.740 quality of our
00:48:57.800 news.
00:48:59.640 So, it's been
00:49:00.380 two years, and
00:49:02.360 masks are back
00:49:03.180 in the conversation.
00:49:05.260 Have you ever
00:49:06.180 seen a major
00:49:07.240 news story where
00:49:09.080 they went through
00:49:10.020 the pros and
00:49:11.060 the cons of
00:49:11.800 masks and showed
00:49:12.740 you the science
00:49:13.460 and had actual
00:49:14.760 people knowledgeable
00:49:16.120 talking about
00:49:16.860 both sides?
00:49:18.320 No, you
00:49:19.020 haven't.
00:49:19.920 No, you
00:49:20.260 haven't.
00:49:21.440 Nope.
00:49:22.360 And so, when I
00:49:23.780 complained, hey,
00:49:25.820 why has nobody
00:49:26.760 shown both sides
00:49:28.560 of the argument
00:49:29.600 in a way that
00:49:30.300 feels credible?
00:49:31.680 A number of
00:49:32.540 people criticized
00:49:33.600 me online, and
00:49:35.440 do you know what
00:49:35.760 they said?
00:49:37.180 Scott, do your
00:49:38.980 own research like
00:49:39.920 I did.
00:49:40.560 Look at this
00:49:41.140 information I have
00:49:43.760 that says masks
00:49:45.000 don't work.
00:49:45.660 And I said,
00:49:47.400 okay, that's a
00:49:48.440 different topic.
00:49:49.800 You're on the
00:49:50.360 topic of do
00:49:51.120 masks work.
00:49:53.160 I'm on the
00:49:53.940 topic of why
00:49:55.460 does our media
00:49:56.160 not help us
00:49:56.900 with this
00:49:57.280 decision?
00:49:57.720 And those two
00:50:00.320 things get
00:50:00.760 conflated, and
00:50:01.680 then I'm an
00:50:02.360 asshole because
00:50:03.460 somebody doesn't
00:50:04.160 know he's on
00:50:04.620 the wrong
00:50:04.920 topic.
00:50:05.900 Like, half of
00:50:06.860 my conversations
00:50:07.680 lately have
00:50:09.440 turned into, I
00:50:11.340 know you think
00:50:12.040 you're disagreeing
00:50:12.800 with me, but
00:50:13.340 you're not even
00:50:14.020 on the same
00:50:14.560 topic, right?
00:50:16.780 You're talking
00:50:17.460 about whether
00:50:17.940 they work, I'm
00:50:19.620 talking about
00:50:20.180 whether anybody
00:50:20.780 helped us with
00:50:21.500 a decision.
00:50:22.080 different topic,
00:50:23.780 sorry.
00:50:25.560 So, watch how
00:50:27.420 many times you
00:50:28.220 think you're
00:50:28.700 having a
00:50:29.140 disagreement when
00:50:30.560 you're just on
00:50:31.020 the wrong topic.
00:50:34.060 Yeah.
00:50:35.160 And in case
00:50:36.120 you're wondering,
00:50:36.800 I'm anti-mask
00:50:37.980 big time.
00:50:40.340 And I don't
00:50:41.000 know what the
00:50:41.420 science is.
00:50:42.620 I don't know.
00:50:43.820 But I know it
00:50:45.300 didn't show up in
00:50:45.940 any of the big
00:50:46.420 numbers, right?
00:50:49.180 So I don't care
00:50:49.980 what your study
00:50:50.560 says, it didn't
00:50:51.220 show up in the
00:50:51.680 overall death
00:50:52.260 count, I don't
00:50:52.800 think, that I'm
00:50:54.380 aware of.
00:50:54.880 But, you know,
00:50:55.400 how would I be
00:50:55.900 aware of it since
00:50:56.600 nobody helped us
00:50:57.320 with that
00:50:57.620 information?
00:51:00.720 So people are
00:51:01.520 mad that Twitter
00:51:02.160 has reversed its
00:51:03.260 policy on COVID
00:51:05.620 disinformation.
00:51:06.900 So it used to
00:51:07.660 be the old
00:51:08.160 Twitter would try
00:51:09.600 to stop anything
00:51:10.380 they thought was
00:51:11.020 disinformation.
00:51:12.560 And now any
00:51:14.060 information on
00:51:15.040 the topic will
00:51:15.660 be allowed.
00:51:16.940 True or false?
00:51:18.400 Now, the people
00:51:20.680 who say, my
00:51:21.300 God, this is
00:51:22.960 going to be
00:51:23.280 bad, how
00:51:25.420 did they go
00:51:25.960 through the
00:51:26.320 entire pandemic
00:51:27.120 without noticing
00:51:28.860 that all of the
00:51:29.780 information was
00:51:30.500 wrong?
00:51:32.660 How did that
00:51:33.420 happen?
00:51:34.760 It was all
00:51:35.740 wrong.
00:51:37.220 All of it.
00:51:39.980 Who in the
00:51:40.700 world thinks
00:51:41.220 that they can
00:51:41.820 determine the
00:51:43.060 part that was
00:51:43.540 right?
00:51:45.160 If the experts
00:51:46.140 couldn't figure
00:51:46.640 out what was
00:51:47.120 right, how are
00:51:47.940 you going to
00:51:48.260 figure it out?
00:51:49.140 Doing your own
00:51:49.820 research on
00:51:51.380 what the
00:51:51.700 experts can't
00:51:52.400 agree on?
00:51:54.480 Yeah, it's an
00:51:56.380 absurd conversation
00:51:57.440 because once again
00:51:58.980 people are saying
00:51:59.920 should we or
00:52:01.000 should we not
00:52:01.740 have this
00:52:02.440 Twitter policy?
00:52:04.160 And it's the
00:52:04.700 wrong topic.
00:52:06.260 The topic is
00:52:07.380 was any of our
00:52:08.940 information right
00:52:09.700 ever?
00:52:10.500 Like how could you
00:52:11.160 possibly know what
00:52:11.980 is disinformation
00:52:12.640 in today's
00:52:13.800 environment?
00:52:15.260 Right?
00:52:15.420 Again, we're
00:52:16.840 not really on
00:52:17.400 the same topic
00:52:18.040 but we act
00:52:18.860 like we are.
00:52:19.780 That's the
00:52:20.240 theme for
00:52:20.640 today.
00:52:23.420 All right.
00:52:27.840 I was asked
00:52:28.900 this question a
00:52:30.560 few times.
00:52:31.600 So David
00:52:32.800 Sachs was on
00:52:35.200 Tucker last
00:52:35.860 night and he
00:52:36.360 was tweeting
00:52:36.800 and I think he
00:52:38.220 came up with it,
00:52:38.940 at least he's the
00:52:39.440 one talking about
00:52:40.000 it, that MAGA
00:52:41.840 has a new meaning
00:52:42.720 now, M-A-G-A.
00:52:45.200 It stands for
00:52:45.920 Microsoft, Apple,
00:52:47.060 Google and Amazon
00:52:47.980 which he calls
00:52:49.180 the tech MAGA.
00:52:50.760 Now, there are
00:52:51.840 other tech
00:52:52.260 companies but
00:52:52.880 they don't work.
00:52:55.160 I guess you
00:52:55.540 could add
00:52:55.860 Twitter and
00:52:58.040 then it would
00:52:58.320 be MAGAT
00:52:59.060 just like the
00:52:59.780 Democrats say.
00:53:00.580 Okay.
00:53:01.300 But anyway,
00:53:03.280 he leaves out
00:53:03.840 Facebook so that
00:53:04.720 the acronym
00:53:05.620 works.
00:53:06.020 So David
00:53:15.080 Sachs' point is
00:53:16.180 that the tech
00:53:17.600 MAGA are
00:53:20.080 basically suppressing
00:53:21.420 free speech and
00:53:22.480 freedom, etc.
00:53:23.940 And so people
00:53:25.800 ask me, is
00:53:26.520 that persuasive?
00:53:30.160 Is it
00:53:30.880 persuasive that
00:53:31.820 there's now like
00:53:32.720 a tech MAGA?
00:53:34.300 So MAGA works
00:53:35.180 both ways.
00:53:35.720 It works on
00:53:36.360 the, yeah.
00:53:40.980 We'll, we'll see
00:53:42.000 I did that comic.
00:53:43.140 I already did
00:53:43.920 that comic.
00:53:47.880 I think it's,
00:53:49.000 I think it's
00:53:49.820 kind of effective
00:53:50.560 because here's
00:53:51.800 the thing.
00:53:52.460 When the left
00:53:53.540 makes a word
00:53:54.800 toxic,
00:53:56.920 it stays
00:53:58.300 toxic.
00:53:59.600 So if you
00:54:00.080 start using
00:54:00.620 that toxicity
00:54:01.380 against them,
00:54:03.260 the toxicity
00:54:04.180 stays with it
00:54:05.020 a little bit.
00:54:05.700 So it
00:54:06.140 probably does
00:54:06.560 work.
00:54:07.500 Pretty good.
00:54:11.880 So apparently
00:54:12.600 a bunch of
00:54:13.180 HIMAR systems,
00:54:14.300 these accurate
00:54:14.940 missile systems,
00:54:15.980 have been
00:54:16.680 delivered to
00:54:17.280 Ukraine.
00:54:18.760 And they're
00:54:20.620 getting some
00:54:20.960 from France.
00:54:21.920 France has a
00:54:22.620 version.
00:54:23.500 We have a
00:54:24.020 version.
00:54:24.320 And here's the
00:54:25.720 question.
00:54:27.020 The HIMAR
00:54:27.500 systems are
00:54:29.020 unique because
00:54:30.700 they don't
00:54:31.260 miss, like
00:54:32.780 they hit what
00:54:33.320 they're shooting
00:54:33.760 at.
00:54:35.900 You don't
00:54:36.620 need many of
00:54:37.260 those, do you?
00:54:38.940 The whole deal
00:54:40.600 of war is
00:54:41.680 everybody's
00:54:42.240 shooting and
00:54:42.700 missing, but
00:54:44.040 if you can
00:54:44.480 actually hit the
00:54:45.080 thing you're
00:54:45.560 aiming for, you
00:54:46.380 win.
00:54:47.740 Right?
00:54:48.560 If the HIMAR
00:54:49.560 systems basically
00:54:50.560 don't miss and
00:54:52.320 the Russians are
00:54:53.000 digging in for
00:54:53.680 the winter, what
00:54:55.220 the hell is going
00:54:55.680 to be left of
00:54:56.820 the Russians?
00:54:57.260 How could
00:54:59.400 there be
00:54:59.640 anything left?
00:55:01.800 Because if
00:55:02.880 you can take
00:55:03.960 out the most
00:55:04.640 important assets,
00:55:07.040 you know, their
00:55:07.340 food, their
00:55:08.260 ammunition, take
00:55:10.120 out their
00:55:10.440 launching platforms,
00:55:12.040 whatever, if you
00:55:13.260 can hit them all
00:55:14.160 and the rockets
00:55:16.640 keep coming in
00:55:17.480 because we're
00:55:17.900 probably making
00:55:18.480 more missiles all
00:55:19.620 the time, unless
00:55:21.840 they run out of
00:55:23.060 missiles, and I
00:55:24.820 don't think they
00:55:25.280 will because we
00:55:25.920 must be making
00:55:26.540 them like crazy,
00:55:27.260 by this point.
00:55:28.200 Unless they run
00:55:28.840 out of missiles,
00:55:29.340 how do they
00:55:29.680 lose?
00:55:32.080 Troops are too
00:55:32.780 spread out?
00:55:33.860 The troops are
00:55:34.520 spread out, but
00:55:35.360 not their assets.
00:55:38.100 Because you're
00:55:38.620 always going to
00:55:39.000 have headquarters.
00:55:41.840 Probably.
00:55:42.500 I mean, the boss
00:55:43.060 has to be
00:55:43.480 somewhere.
00:55:44.260 You're always
00:55:44.700 going to have
00:55:45.220 food storage.
00:55:46.700 You're always
00:55:47.020 going to have
00:55:47.540 weapons depots.
00:55:50.620 You're always
00:55:51.060 going to have
00:55:51.400 big missile
00:55:53.260 launchers of
00:55:53.860 your own.
00:55:54.300 war is about
00:55:57.640 logistics, right?
00:56:00.840 I don't know.
00:56:01.280 I think by the
00:56:02.180 end of the
00:56:02.560 winter, there
00:56:03.100 just won't be
00:56:03.740 much left of
00:56:04.360 the Russians.
00:56:06.200 But of course,
00:56:06.900 they can reinforce.
00:56:08.160 So it doesn't
00:56:08.580 mean anything in
00:56:10.000 terms of
00:56:10.360 prediction.
00:56:10.700 Ukraine, you
00:56:18.360 are so
00:56:18.840 offed.
00:56:19.800 Whenever I
00:56:20.300 talk about
00:56:20.740 Ukraine, somebody
00:56:21.680 says, you
00:56:22.960 are so off.
00:56:24.020 Let me ask you
00:56:24.660 this.
00:56:27.320 My claim is
00:56:28.620 that after my
00:56:30.180 disastrously
00:56:31.120 incorrect prediction
00:56:32.260 that Russia would
00:56:33.200 be too dumb to
00:56:34.040 attack and
00:56:35.060 actually attack
00:56:35.700 Ukraine.
00:56:36.440 Now, I was
00:56:37.400 certainly right
00:56:37.980 that it was
00:56:38.320 dumb.
00:56:38.620 but I
00:56:40.580 wasn't right
00:56:41.180 that Putin
00:56:41.660 knew it
00:56:42.000 too.
00:56:43.400 Apparently, I
00:56:43.980 knew it and
00:56:44.480 Putin wasn't
00:56:45.120 aware of it.
00:56:46.160 So totally
00:56:46.820 wrong about
00:56:47.300 that.
00:56:48.220 But I
00:56:48.480 believe that I
00:56:50.040 am the most
00:56:50.660 right about
00:56:51.820 what would
00:56:52.240 happen if
00:56:52.880 Russia attacked.
00:56:55.040 I'm going to
00:56:55.800 say that nobody
00:56:56.520 in the
00:56:57.540 pundit business,
00:56:59.800 no military
00:57:00.680 expert, no
00:57:01.360 nobody, was
00:57:02.560 as accurate as
00:57:03.480 I have been
00:57:04.080 in predicting
00:57:05.100 the Ukraine
00:57:05.660 war.
00:57:07.020 Anybody
00:57:07.360 disagree?
00:57:07.740 Now, of
00:57:11.240 course, it's
00:57:11.580 not over, so
00:57:13.120 in the end, I
00:57:13.780 could be the
00:57:14.260 most wrong
00:57:14.880 person.
00:57:16.060 In other
00:57:16.500 words, if
00:57:16.800 Russia just
00:57:17.320 rolls the
00:57:17.900 entire country
00:57:18.540 in the
00:57:19.400 spring, then
00:57:20.020 I'm the
00:57:20.360 most wrong
00:57:21.080 person.
00:57:21.780 But at
00:57:22.140 the moment,
00:57:23.180 I'm the
00:57:23.560 most right
00:57:24.500 predictor of
00:57:25.540 Ukraine, as
00:57:27.220 I was the
00:57:27.740 most right
00:57:28.320 predictor in
00:57:29.320 all things
00:57:30.000 about the
00:57:31.360 pandemic.
00:57:32.640 Now, I
00:57:33.160 know you
00:57:33.420 disagree with
00:57:34.000 that, but
00:57:34.940 I have a
00:57:35.440 long document
00:57:36.060 that goes
00:57:36.620 through all
00:57:36.920 my thoughts,
00:57:37.620 and if
00:57:37.820 you take
00:57:38.100 out your
00:57:38.480 fake news
00:57:39.000 about me,
00:57:40.040 I was
00:57:40.380 actually the
00:57:40.820 best predictor
00:57:41.480 of the
00:57:41.700 pandemic, by
00:57:42.840 far.
00:57:43.620 Nobody was
00:57:44.000 even close.
00:57:48.340 You think
00:57:49.020 Russia is
00:57:49.440 getting crushed?
00:57:50.900 Well, everybody
00:57:51.420 does.
00:57:53.260 The Russian
00:57:53.980 military, there's
00:57:54.740 nobody who says
00:57:55.340 the Russian
00:57:55.720 military is in
00:57:57.400 good shape.
00:57:58.580 Nobody says
00:57:59.280 that.
00:58:00.260 There are
00:58:00.700 zero people.
00:58:01.680 I was the
00:58:02.160 only person who
00:58:02.840 said we would
00:58:03.400 be in this
00:58:03.820 situation.
00:58:04.280 let me just
00:58:06.040 test your
00:58:06.460 knowledge.
00:58:08.000 Who else
00:58:08.660 said that we
00:58:09.360 would be in
00:58:09.820 the situation
00:58:10.400 we are right
00:58:11.040 now?
00:58:11.380 Just me.
00:58:12.700 I believe I'm
00:58:13.380 literally the
00:58:13.980 only person.
00:58:15.620 Can anybody
00:58:16.260 fact check me?
00:58:18.460 I'm the only
00:58:19.280 person.
00:58:20.760 Scott Ritter,
00:58:21.580 but he writes
00:58:23.140 for RT, so
00:58:24.040 that's different.
00:58:28.500 I think it was
00:58:29.200 just me.
00:58:29.580 Have you
00:58:31.620 ever thought
00:58:32.920 about the
00:58:33.500 predictions I've
00:58:34.380 made that are
00:58:34.840 the weird ones?
00:58:36.940 Remember when I
00:58:37.560 predicted that
00:58:38.220 Trump would
00:58:38.700 change the
00:58:39.500 nature of
00:58:40.100 reality, or
00:58:41.320 how we saw
00:58:41.840 it?
00:58:43.380 Nobody thought
00:58:44.180 that was a
00:58:44.600 real thing when
00:58:45.140 I said it.
00:58:46.480 Here we are.
00:58:47.720 The very
00:58:48.520 nature of
00:58:49.060 reality in
00:58:49.820 every way is
00:58:51.340 being completely
00:58:52.280 up for grabs.
00:58:54.560 Completely up
00:58:55.160 for grabs.
00:58:57.040 Yeah, I'm a
00:58:57.480 rogue predictor,
00:58:58.440 but a good
00:58:59.720 one, apparently.
00:59:03.140 Junior says,
00:59:04.080 Scott predicts
00:59:04.780 what he sees
00:59:05.280 on CNN.
00:59:07.760 I feel like
00:59:08.740 you've never
00:59:09.300 been on,
00:59:10.120 like somebody
00:59:10.640 who's only been
00:59:11.120 here in like
00:59:11.600 60 seconds.
00:59:17.940 Will women
00:59:18.820 changing Iran
00:59:19.800 affect the
00:59:20.320 supply of
00:59:20.780 drones?
00:59:21.280 Well, I
00:59:21.580 don't think
00:59:21.900 anything's
00:59:22.460 going to
00:59:22.600 happen soon.
00:59:28.440 in Canada,
00:59:30.660 every time
00:59:31.080 you buy
00:59:31.460 something,
00:59:31.960 they ask
00:59:32.280 for a
00:59:32.600 Ukraine
00:59:32.980 donation,
00:59:33.720 somebody
00:59:34.040 said.
00:59:37.080 You have
00:59:37.700 to be
00:59:37.960 skeptical of
00:59:38.780 hypnotist
00:59:39.400 Scott describing
00:59:40.920 what he said
00:59:41.480 in the past.
00:59:42.460 Well, there
00:59:43.040 are enough
00:59:43.340 witnesses here
00:59:44.120 that I think
00:59:45.360 you can...
00:59:47.600 you might
00:59:48.680 just be
00:59:49.260 good at
00:59:49.780 remembering
00:59:50.160 your correct
00:59:50.780 predictions.
00:59:51.680 Well, that's
00:59:52.000 true.
00:59:52.600 That's why I do
00:59:53.540 it publicly.
00:59:55.960 That's why I do
00:59:56.820 it publicly,
00:59:57.560 because that's
00:59:58.780 exactly true,
01:00:00.160 that I would
01:00:00.780 have a tendency
01:00:01.240 to remember the
01:00:02.200 ones I got
01:00:02.660 right,
01:00:03.600 and a tendency
01:00:04.180 to forget the
01:00:05.560 ones I got
01:00:06.000 wrong.
01:00:06.520 That's why I do
01:00:07.080 it in public,
01:00:07.940 so that you
01:00:08.400 can be my
01:00:08.880 memory.
01:00:09.180 All right.
01:00:13.200 Ladies and
01:00:13.920 gentlemen,
01:00:15.080 this comes to
01:00:18.060 the conclusion
01:00:18.560 of the best
01:00:20.000 live stream
01:00:20.480 you'll see
01:00:20.820 today.
01:00:21.400 I think it
01:00:21.780 was awesome.
01:00:22.740 I'm going to
01:00:23.140 say goodbye
01:00:23.580 to the YouTube
01:00:24.640 and Spotify
01:00:26.220 and Rumble
01:00:26.900 people,
01:00:28.040 and I'll
01:00:28.540 talk to the
01:00:29.240 locals,
01:00:30.020 people privately
01:00:30.920 here.
01:00:31.740 Bye for now.
01:00:33.420 Thanks for
01:00:34.060 joining.