Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 11, 2022


Episode 1954 Scott Adams: More Twitter Revelations, So Juicy! Russian Arms Dealer Has Some Surprises


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 19 minutes

Words per minute

140.15451

Word count

11,199

Sentence count

819

Harmful content

Misogyny

18

sentences flagged

Toxicity

77

sentences flagged

Hate speech

35

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Joshua Steidman has a problem with guitars, and it has nothing to do with music, but it does have a point. And it s not about guitars. It s about sports and other things that haven t changed much in the last 100 years.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 And I would not argue with that.
00:00:02.420 I wouldn't argue with it at all.
00:00:04.120 Because it might be the best thing that's ever happened to you.
00:00:06.840 And you won't believe this part, but it's going to get better.
00:00:11.480 Yeah, yeah, it gets better than this.
00:00:14.340 Right, right, I know.
00:00:16.260 It's hard to believe.
00:00:17.440 But all you need to make it better is a cupper mugger, a glass of tanker,
00:00:21.200 a chalice or a steiner, a canteen, a joker, a flasker, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:24.280 Fill it with your favorite liquid, I like, coffee.
00:00:27.260 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine here of the day,
00:00:31.620 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:33.220 It's called a simultaneous sip.
00:00:36.640 It happens now.
00:00:38.720 Go.
00:00:43.800 Ah.
00:00:45.420 Very good.
00:00:48.580 Well, I would like to start with an angry screed against guitars.
00:00:57.260 Some of you know I bought myself a nice guitar, and I said to myself,
00:01:00.960 how hard could that be?
00:01:02.720 How hard could it be to play a guitar?
00:01:05.420 And then you find out, okay, the first thing you need to know
00:01:08.420 is you need to deform your fingers so that they can form unnatural claw-like shapes
00:01:14.820 that you'll use in a non-obvious claw-like way.
00:01:21.200 Now, if you have a normal-sized hand, you need to be able to spread these.
00:01:29.780 So my guitar teacher said, try putting a tennis ball between these two fingers,
00:01:35.260 like spread them out, to which I sat there and I thought,
00:01:38.400 are you seriously telling me I have to deform my body to play an instrument?
00:01:43.740 Now, I've got a complaint, and it goes like this.
00:01:51.120 I'll try to say this without the F word,
00:01:53.280 but I don't think I'm going to be able to get all the way through it.
00:01:58.980 Serenity now.
00:02:00.960 And it goes like this.
00:02:03.760 If you invented a musical instrument,
00:02:06.580 or perhaps a sporting event,
00:02:10.280 and you invented that sporting event or musical instrument 0.99
00:02:14.920 a hundred fucking years ago, 0.97
00:02:19.040 maybe every now and then you should take a look at it, 0.92
00:02:22.460 see if you could upgrade the interface.
00:02:25.360 Say to yourself,
00:02:26.160 I wonder if anything's improved in the last hundred years.
00:02:33.000 For example, when basketball was invented,
00:02:36.580 and they said, let's put this hoop at ten feet, 0.99
00:02:40.120 do you think they were saying to themselves,
00:02:42.520 oh, this will be fun when seven-foot tall people overtake the sport, 0.83
00:02:48.440 and the only thing you're really finding out is how tall people are,
00:02:51.640 give or take, you know, a curry.
00:02:55.960 Do you think you would have invented basketball the same way?
00:02:58.900 Hey, let's invent things where a seven-footer
00:03:04.360 will just stand near the hoop and ruin the game for the rest of us?
00:03:09.180 Hey, I'm here to ruin the game for the rest of you
00:03:11.060 because it wasn't invented for seven-foot tall people.
00:03:13.740 Didn't see this coming, did you?
00:03:15.340 Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
00:03:16.940 Or how about tennis? 1.00
00:03:18.900 Are any of you dumb enough to play tennis? 0.99
00:03:21.500 I was dumb enough to play tennis for, I don't know, 1.00
00:03:24.120 50 years until I quit. 0.88
00:03:26.040 Do you know what ruined tennis?
00:03:29.820 The equipment.
00:03:31.860 The game stayed the same,
00:03:33.900 and somebody kept inventing stronger players
00:03:36.460 and more powerful rackets
00:03:38.600 until the entire game is some guy with an arm the size of a tree trunk
00:03:44.520 serving bullets at the other person,
00:03:46.960 and the other person's like,
00:03:48.000 and that's basically the sport of tennis. 0.99
00:03:52.920 Every hundred fucking years, 0.97
00:03:55.040 you should take a look at your sport 0.99
00:03:56.380 and see if anything has changed
00:03:58.440 to maybe update it a little bit.
00:04:01.140 All right?
00:04:01.680 Now, I'm no Elon Musk,
00:04:05.620 but if I were,
00:04:08.480 I would buy all of the guitar-making manufacturers in the world,
00:04:13.180 and I'd say,
00:04:14.260 you know what you shouldn't make anymore
00:04:16.120 is an instrument that requires you to put fingers
00:04:19.320 in a distorted monster way
00:04:22.340 around a thing that's way too thick for your hand,
00:04:26.420 and like this,
00:04:28.480 like that.
00:04:29.540 Don't do that.
00:04:32.300 Instead, let me just suggest
00:04:34.720 that each of these cords could possibly be maybe one button.
00:04:40.460 Yes, I know there are more cords
00:04:42.620 than you could fit with buttons, perhaps,
00:04:44.560 but you only need three to do most.
00:04:48.080 You know, you could do a lot with three cords.
00:04:50.480 You give me 50 cords,
00:04:52.440 one button apiece,
00:04:54.480 I think I could learn to play the guitar,
00:04:57.220 but I wouldn't learn to play the guitar
00:04:59.280 like this,
00:05:00.760 like this,
00:05:02.140 deforming my body.
00:05:03.640 Oh, hey, everybody.
00:05:05.120 Good news.
00:05:06.240 I've been playing the guitar so long
00:05:07.900 that my hand is now deformed
00:05:09.280 permanently,
00:05:10.440 and now I'm a great guitar player.
00:05:14.120 Look at this.
00:05:15.540 Look at my sport.
00:05:20.400 All right.
00:05:20.980 I just had to get that out of my system.
00:05:23.880 Now can we talk about the news?
00:05:26.700 That was just
00:05:27.540 a point of personal privilege there.
00:05:30.340 Sorry.
00:05:34.040 Joshua Steidman
00:05:35.080 has a very interesting thread.
00:05:37.080 You've heard about these
00:05:38.740 seemingly independent attacks
00:05:41.520 on our grid.
00:05:43.760 So in a few cases,
00:05:45.180 people have snipers
00:05:46.860 have fired bullets
00:05:47.720 into power grids
00:05:49.320 in local places.
00:05:51.160 But there seems to be
00:05:52.660 some kind of a,
00:05:53.920 maybe a pattern.
00:05:55.600 There seems to be an uptick
00:05:56.760 in what look to be
00:05:58.880 rogue attacks
00:05:59.960 on the infrastructure.
00:06:01.940 Now, we don't have any evidence
00:06:03.620 that these are coordinated.
00:06:04.900 But as Joshua
00:06:06.920 so wisely points out,
00:06:10.440 if a foreign country
00:06:13.240 wanted to mess with us,
00:06:14.880 and as he uses the phrase,
00:06:17.020 put sand in our gears,
00:06:19.320 one of the ways
00:06:20.440 you could do it,
00:06:21.460 which is a known,
00:06:22.960 understood way
00:06:23.640 to do things,
00:06:24.840 is the intelligence agency
00:06:26.580 from another
00:06:27.340 unfriendly country
00:06:28.960 could look for
00:06:30.920 rogue criminal elements
00:06:33.100 who would be willing
00:06:33.860 to do an attack
00:06:34.720 for money.
00:06:36.260 And then it wouldn't be obvious
00:06:37.580 where the attacks
00:06:38.240 were coming from.
00:06:39.000 It would look like
00:06:39.580 a bunch of individual
00:06:41.140 rogue terrorists.
00:06:43.960 And Joshua points out
00:06:46.620 that there's
00:06:47.460 at least three possibilities here.
00:06:50.720 But they all have
00:06:51.640 to be considered.
00:06:52.740 One is that they are
00:06:53.660 individual attacks,
00:06:54.920 and there's something
00:06:55.560 that's causing more of them,
00:06:56.860 but maybe not anybody
00:06:58.400 coordinating it.
00:06:59.320 Number two,
00:07:04.240 possibility is
00:07:05.300 it's an actual
00:07:05.980 coordinated attack
00:07:07.280 in which
00:07:08.540 the foreign government
00:07:10.400 is trying to hurt
00:07:11.360 the United States,
00:07:12.780 and it's just about
00:07:13.780 hurting us.
00:07:14.860 That's possible.
00:07:16.380 The other possibility
00:07:17.400 is the funny one,
00:07:19.040 that there's a foreign country
00:07:20.580 that's trying to send us
00:07:21.680 a message
00:07:22.200 that they could destroy
00:07:23.860 our grid
00:07:24.380 any time they want to,
00:07:26.240 but we're not getting
00:07:27.120 the message
00:07:27.680 because it's too indirect.
00:07:29.520 It's too subtle.
00:07:31.080 Like, okay,
00:07:32.160 are they trying to send
00:07:33.040 us a message?
00:07:34.240 Because they look like
00:07:35.200 individual attacks,
00:07:36.660 but they do have
00:07:37.440 something in common,
00:07:39.100 but we don't know
00:07:39.820 who would be sending
00:07:40.480 the message.
00:07:41.960 So it might actually be
00:07:43.500 one possibility
00:07:45.000 is that it's
00:07:45.600 a failed attempt
00:07:46.780 to send a message
00:07:48.140 that somebody could
00:07:49.060 take us out
00:07:49.560 if they want to,
00:07:50.760 and we're not getting it.
00:07:53.220 Now,
00:07:53.920 I don't know
00:07:54.740 which one to bet on,
00:07:55.600 but I like
00:07:57.540 the way of thinking
00:07:59.460 that says
00:08:00.120 don't eliminate
00:08:01.020 all the possibilities.
00:08:04.100 Like,
00:08:04.400 need to look into it
00:08:05.360 a little bit.
00:08:07.220 All right.
00:08:12.440 So,
00:08:13.440 have you ever heard me say,
00:08:15.480 for those of you
00:08:16.540 who are new
00:08:16.860 to my live stream,
00:08:18.660 can the people
00:08:19.260 who have been watching
00:08:19.780 me for a while,
00:08:20.960 how many times
00:08:21.860 have I said
00:08:22.580 that in the long run
00:08:24.220 the United States
00:08:25.000 and Russia
00:08:25.440 are natural allies?
00:08:27.640 The actual phrase,
00:08:28.460 the word natural allies.
00:08:31.180 Can you confirm
00:08:31.940 that I've said that
00:08:32.660 way too many times?
00:08:33.960 I've said that
00:08:34.480 so many times.
00:08:36.280 Well,
00:08:36.800 today in the news,
00:08:38.720 freed Russian arms dealer
00:08:41.920 Victor Bout,
00:08:43.480 he's the one
00:08:44.120 who was traded
00:08:44.860 for Greiner,
00:08:47.220 the WNBA player.
00:08:48.940 So he's free now.
00:08:49.940 He had been
00:08:50.280 in an American jail
00:08:51.280 for his arms dealing,
00:08:53.940 which were pretty bad
00:08:55.300 because he armed
00:08:56.200 a lot of African
00:08:57.020 and other countries
00:08:58.580 that killed
00:08:59.240 a lot of people.
00:09:00.560 But it turns out
00:09:01.700 that Victor,
00:09:02.900 the dangerous
00:09:03.820 Russian arms dealer,
00:09:05.320 is very pro-American.
00:09:07.540 He's very pro-American.
00:09:10.300 He speaks
00:09:11.060 really good English
00:09:12.000 with an accent,
00:09:13.420 but he's really good English.
00:09:15.060 And in jail,
00:09:16.420 he said he would
00:09:17.100 hang around
00:09:18.200 with a number
00:09:19.760 of rural people.
00:09:21.800 I don't know
00:09:22.160 why he mentioned rural,
00:09:23.840 probably because
00:09:24.900 they were white,
00:09:25.580 now that I think about it.
00:09:26.800 But he said
00:09:27.200 he hung around
00:09:27.780 with a lot of rural people,
00:09:29.540 you know, Americans,
00:09:30.560 and he said
00:09:31.000 they were great
00:09:31.560 because they were
00:09:33.100 all interested in Russia.
00:09:34.400 Nobody had any
00:09:35.220 bad feelings about Russia.
00:09:37.120 He had no bad feelings
00:09:38.360 about Americans.
00:09:39.420 Loves Americans.
00:09:41.060 And he said,
00:09:42.360 he actually used
00:09:43.020 the same phrase.
00:09:44.420 He said that Russia
00:09:45.180 and the United States
00:09:45.860 are natural allies.
00:09:47.080 Did you see that coming?
00:09:50.380 Like, who had that
00:09:51.500 on their bingo card?
00:09:53.340 Freed Russian arms dealer
00:09:54.880 says U.S. and America
00:09:55.960 are natural allies,
00:09:57.340 and we should maybe
00:09:58.040 yak that way.
00:10:03.180 Scott doesn't say
00:10:04.200 we are natural allies.
00:10:05.980 First time hearing it
00:10:07.060 since 2017.
00:10:09.200 So there's somebody
00:10:10.040 out here who says
00:10:10.780 I've never said that.
00:10:13.520 But there are plenty
00:10:14.480 of people who've heard
00:10:15.220 me say it
00:10:15.780 probably 12 times.
00:10:18.480 Yeah, I've said it a lot.
00:10:21.960 So, I don't know
00:10:23.080 if that means anything,
00:10:24.040 but it's interesting
00:10:24.700 to have a famous
00:10:26.740 Russian arms dealer
00:10:28.040 agree with me.
00:10:29.700 Because if you don't
00:10:30.620 have a famous
00:10:31.460 Russian arms dealer
00:10:32.620 agreeing with your
00:10:33.600 live stream,
00:10:35.340 well, you need to
00:10:36.040 work harder.
00:10:37.120 Try to get them
00:10:37.640 on your side.
00:10:39.720 Today is full of
00:10:40.740 actually really
00:10:41.400 interesting news.
00:10:42.820 Like the kind
00:10:43.740 where you just say,
00:10:44.720 really?
00:10:45.880 Really?
00:10:47.780 Is that true?
00:10:49.260 All right, here's
00:10:49.620 another one.
00:10:50.860 How many of you
00:10:51.580 know Daniel Ellsberg
00:10:52.860 from the,
00:10:53.740 it was the
00:10:54.140 Pentagon Papers,
00:10:55.200 right?
00:10:55.960 So he had some,
00:10:56.860 he had some secret
00:10:58.500 U.S. government
00:11:00.660 documents.
00:11:02.620 And so that was,
00:11:04.080 you know,
00:11:04.260 a famous story
00:11:04.900 of Daniel Ellsberg.
00:11:06.120 So Daniel Ellsberg
00:11:06.920 now is quite elderly.
00:11:09.380 I don't know
00:11:10.080 how old he is,
00:11:10.860 but it looks like
00:11:12.220 he's around 80-ish,
00:11:13.940 right?
00:11:14.700 And here's something
00:11:15.700 we just learned.
00:11:17.220 Apparently Assange
00:11:18.420 gave Daniel Ellsberg
00:11:20.300 a full copy
00:11:21.740 of all the
00:11:22.280 Chelsea Manning
00:11:23.520 stuff that
00:11:25.080 WikiLeaks had
00:11:26.140 just in case.
00:11:29.080 So Daniel Ellsberg
00:11:30.140 had the full copy
00:11:31.240 the whole time
00:11:32.280 of everything
00:11:33.520 that Assange
00:11:34.520 had produced.
00:11:35.880 and the reason
00:11:37.000 that he'd given
00:11:37.580 it to Ellsberg,
00:11:41.220 the reason he'd
00:11:42.480 given it to Ellsberg
00:11:43.220 is as a
00:11:44.040 emergency backup
00:11:45.120 because he was
00:11:46.440 the one person
00:11:47.180 that he trusted
00:11:47.900 to get it out
00:11:48.580 to the public.
00:11:50.600 That's kind of
00:11:51.380 amazing,
00:11:51.840 isn't it?
00:11:52.440 And we're just
00:11:53.100 finding it out.
00:11:54.520 And then here's
00:11:55.380 the, you know,
00:11:56.600 the added boost
00:11:58.420 on top of it.
00:12:00.040 Ellsberg is saying
00:12:01.000 that if Assange
00:12:02.720 is guilty
00:12:04.140 of simply
00:12:05.860 possessing
00:12:06.580 the documents
00:12:07.260 because I think,
00:12:08.280 I don't know
00:12:08.820 the specific
00:12:09.600 legal argument
00:12:10.900 here,
00:12:11.520 but I think
00:12:12.000 the argument
00:12:12.860 is that simply
00:12:14.120 possessing
00:12:15.740 these secret
00:12:16.560 documents
00:12:17.060 is a crime.
00:12:19.000 And Ellsberg
00:12:19.720 is saying
00:12:20.160 if that's a crime
00:12:20.960 you better indict
00:12:21.700 me
00:12:22.060 because I have
00:12:23.320 them.
00:12:25.300 Right?
00:12:27.380 He illegally
00:12:28.860 has these
00:12:30.620 documents
00:12:31.120 but he would
00:12:32.040 say that he
00:12:32.640 legally has them
00:12:33.540 because they
00:12:34.360 were given
00:12:34.680 to him
00:12:35.180 by somebody
00:12:36.140 he did not
00:12:36.640 steal them.
00:12:38.020 So that's
00:12:38.660 legal if you're
00:12:39.500 not the stealer
00:12:40.240 I guess.
00:12:41.360 Now he makes
00:12:41.940 the point
00:12:42.320 that if this
00:12:42.900 were Great
00:12:43.360 Britain
00:12:43.700 it would
00:12:44.740 definitely
00:12:45.180 be illegal
00:12:45.760 because they
00:12:46.140 have a
00:12:46.380 specific law
00:12:47.340 that says
00:12:48.460 you can't
00:12:49.040 have any
00:12:49.540 secret
00:12:50.120 government
00:12:50.520 documents.
00:12:51.420 That's my
00:12:51.740 understanding.
00:12:52.940 But Ellsberg
00:12:53.760 points out
00:12:54.500 that in the
00:12:54.900 United States
00:12:55.400 we don't
00:12:55.720 have that
00:12:56.060 law.
00:12:57.480 And simply
00:12:58.000 possessing
00:12:58.780 the documents
00:12:59.360 is not a
00:12:59.940 crime.
00:13:00.620 And he'd
00:13:01.340 be willing
00:13:01.680 to test
00:13:02.160 it.
00:13:02.860 Like he's
00:13:03.300 actually
00:13:03.600 begging for
00:13:04.960 the let's
00:13:06.340 bring it
00:13:06.660 on.
00:13:07.440 Let's test
00:13:07.960 this in
00:13:08.320 court.
00:13:09.780 How much
00:13:10.500 do you
00:13:10.720 love that?
00:13:12.500 This is the
00:13:14.440 America that I
00:13:15.240 want to live
00:13:15.700 in.
00:13:16.220 Right?
00:13:16.700 This little
00:13:17.220 scenario where
00:13:19.280 somebody had
00:13:19.860 some information
00:13:20.540 they thought
00:13:20.960 would be good
00:13:21.380 for the
00:13:21.680 citizens.
00:13:22.480 They found
00:13:23.160 the most
00:13:23.640 trustworthy
00:13:24.200 citizen they
00:13:25.100 could find
00:13:25.560 on this
00:13:26.440 topic.
00:13:27.200 According to
00:13:27.960 Assange
00:13:28.520 apparently.
00:13:29.520 Gave him
00:13:30.040 the documents
00:13:30.620 had a good
00:13:31.100 backup plan
00:13:31.900 and then the
00:13:32.960 backup plan
00:13:33.840 is working
00:13:35.260 not exactly
00:13:35.960 the way
00:13:36.360 Assange
00:13:36.800 planned but
00:13:38.140 in a different
00:13:38.680 way.
00:13:39.840 It's working.
00:13:41.240 In other words
00:13:41.780 Ellsberg now
00:13:42.520 just entered
00:13:43.800 the fight.
00:13:45.080 If he had
00:13:45.580 not had
00:13:46.400 those documents
00:13:47.200 Ellsberg is
00:13:48.020 91.
00:13:48.680 Thank you.
00:13:49.520 Ellsberg is
00:13:50.040 91.
00:13:50.840 If Ellsberg
00:13:51.580 were not
00:13:52.380 91 and
00:13:53.700 still willing
00:13:54.320 to fight
00:13:54.860 this would
00:13:55.960 look different.
00:13:57.660 This would
00:13:58.260 look different.
00:14:01.740 All right.
00:14:04.160 So here's
00:14:05.240 what I
00:14:06.360 tentatively
00:14:07.000 favor but
00:14:07.840 I'm going
00:14:08.120 to tell you
00:14:08.460 that I'm
00:14:08.820 not fully
00:14:10.540 informed on
00:14:11.320 the whole
00:14:11.700 Assange
00:14:12.240 WikiLeak
00:14:12.780 thing.
00:14:13.200 I feel
00:14:13.640 like I
00:14:14.440 might have
00:14:14.860 some dark
00:14:16.980 corners there
00:14:18.100 that need
00:14:18.640 a little
00:14:18.860 light in my
00:14:19.460 understanding.
00:14:20.560 But here's
00:14:21.060 where I'm
00:14:21.360 at.
00:14:22.420 I'd like
00:14:23.040 to see a
00:14:23.440 public trial.
00:14:24.860 I don't
00:14:26.560 even know
00:14:26.860 if that's
00:14:27.100 an option.
00:14:28.160 But would
00:14:28.740 we be able
00:14:29.280 to see
00:14:29.580 the trial
00:14:29.980 or would
00:14:30.340 it be a
00:14:30.620 bunch of
00:14:30.940 secret stuff
00:14:31.600 so it
00:14:31.880 would have
00:14:32.000 to be
00:14:32.240 behind
00:14:32.540 closed
00:14:32.960 doors?
00:14:33.760 If it's
00:14:34.280 behind
00:14:34.520 closed
00:14:34.920 doors I
00:14:35.400 don't
00:14:35.560 favor it
00:14:36.020 at all.
00:14:37.380 If it's
00:14:38.800 going to
00:14:39.020 be open
00:14:39.400 to the
00:14:39.700 public as
00:14:40.400 much as
00:14:40.820 possible
00:14:41.480 then I
00:14:42.620 say let's
00:14:43.000 test it.
00:14:45.120 I don't
00:14:46.120 even know
00:14:46.560 why Assange
00:14:47.340 is so
00:14:47.960 concerned
00:14:48.520 about
00:14:49.240 extradition
00:14:51.400 because it's
00:14:52.500 not like
00:14:52.880 he's a
00:14:53.200 free person.
00:14:53.780 I feel
00:14:55.040 like it's
00:14:55.440 his only
00:14:55.800 path to
00:14:56.280 freedom.
00:14:57.560 And if
00:14:57.980 his only
00:14:58.400 path to
00:14:58.840 freedom would
00:14:59.440 also give
00:15:00.040 us American
00:15:01.560 citizens the
00:15:02.340 things we
00:15:02.760 want to
00:15:03.080 know I
00:15:06.320 feel like
00:15:06.780 that's a
00:15:07.100 win-win.
00:15:08.100 Does
00:15:08.360 anybody see a
00:15:08.940 problem with
00:15:09.360 that?
00:15:10.140 What would
00:15:10.520 be the
00:15:10.780 problem with
00:15:11.160 just putting
00:15:11.820 it in court
00:15:12.360 and letting
00:15:12.780 us see how
00:15:13.780 it plays
00:15:14.080 out?
00:15:16.980 He might
00:15:17.620 be
00:15:17.780 abstained.
00:15:18.220 but doesn't
00:15:20.200 he have
00:15:20.460 that risk
00:15:20.900 already?
00:15:21.740 I mean
00:15:21.960 would he
00:15:22.600 be in
00:15:22.940 more danger
00:15:24.600 here than
00:15:25.160 wherever he
00:15:25.700 is?
00:15:26.300 I mean
00:15:26.560 anybody can
00:15:27.400 get to
00:15:27.700 him anywhere.
00:15:30.940 You've been
00:15:31.540 yelling power
00:15:32.220 chords at me.
00:15:33.320 I've been
00:15:33.620 playing the
00:15:34.040 power chords
00:15:34.660 but even
00:15:35.120 the power
00:15:35.520 chords you
00:15:36.180 need these
00:15:36.760 two fingers
00:15:37.480 to be
00:15:38.260 further apart
00:15:38.900 than a
00:15:39.240 normal hand.
00:15:41.000 So I
00:15:42.000 hear what you
00:15:42.440 say.
00:15:42.780 I was
00:15:43.060 practicing
00:15:43.480 my
00:15:43.780 power
00:15:44.020 chords
00:15:44.280 yesterday.
00:15:48.640 Anyway.
00:15:50.320 So let's
00:15:51.380 keep an eye
00:15:51.800 on that.
00:15:53.540 Here's a
00:15:54.140 funny, not
00:15:54.880 a funny
00:15:55.280 story, a
00:15:56.000 horrible
00:15:56.260 story.
00:15:56.840 I'm sorry.
00:15:58.120 Did I say
00:15:58.520 it was
00:15:58.740 funny?
00:15:59.720 This is a
00:16:00.260 tragic,
00:16:00.800 horrible
00:16:01.000 story about
00:16:02.820 a nurse in 0.56
00:16:03.840 Germany who
00:16:05.280 gave 8,600
00:16:07.320 patients a
00:16:08.360 saline shot
00:16:09.280 when they
00:16:10.280 thought they
00:16:10.660 were getting
00:16:10.960 a COVID
00:16:11.440 vaccination.
00:16:12.900 So apparently
00:16:13.400 this nurse 1.00
00:16:14.060 was anti
00:16:15.680 vax, anti
00:16:17.020 COVID vax
00:16:17.780 and was
00:16:19.240 giving people
00:16:20.040 saline instead
00:16:21.380 of the
00:16:21.780 vaccination.
00:16:23.220 And so
00:16:23.780 she got
00:16:24.460 convicted and
00:16:26.120 she'll serve 0.88
00:16:26.800 some time I
00:16:27.540 guess.
00:16:28.680 And here's
00:16:29.300 the, or
00:16:29.960 no, she 0.79
00:16:30.820 won't serve
00:16:31.180 time.
00:16:31.500 I think it
00:16:31.800 was a
00:16:32.400 suspended
00:16:34.380 sentence or
00:16:35.580 something.
00:16:35.960 I don't
00:16:36.120 know.
00:16:36.520 But she's 0.97
00:16:36.960 got some
00:16:37.260 kind of
00:16:37.540 penalty.
00:16:39.420 But is
00:16:40.320 there anything
00:16:40.700 missing in
00:16:41.940 the story?
00:16:42.380 Now, apparently
00:16:43.760 she admitted
00:16:44.700 that she
00:16:45.380 gave some
00:16:46.020 saline
00:16:46.560 injections, but
00:16:48.400 then they
00:16:48.780 thought, wait,
00:16:49.480 it's probably
00:16:49.940 more than
00:16:50.320 some.
00:16:50.840 And then
00:16:51.100 they started
00:16:51.460 testing all
00:16:52.060 the people
00:16:52.440 who had
00:16:52.880 been to
00:16:53.940 her and
00:16:54.280 they found
00:16:54.620 out that
00:16:54.960 they didn't
00:16:55.280 have antibodies
00:16:55.980 for the
00:16:56.520 vaccination.
00:16:57.200 vaccination.
00:16:58.160 So they
00:16:58.720 determined
00:16:59.100 there's
00:16:59.360 8,600
00:16:59.840 people who
00:17:01.100 should have
00:17:01.460 been vaccinated
00:17:02.160 and weren't.
00:17:03.140 And mostly
00:17:03.560 they were
00:17:03.880 over 70.
00:17:05.400 So it was
00:17:05.760 actually the
00:17:06.260 most vulnerable
00:17:06.900 population.
00:17:09.020 Now, is
00:17:09.680 there anything
00:17:09.960 missing in the
00:17:10.580 story?
00:17:11.840 Any dogs not
00:17:12.940 barking?
00:17:14.460 Thank you.
00:17:15.700 That's right.
00:17:17.580 Did
00:17:17.940 anybody
00:17:20.420 ask the
00:17:22.180 8,600
00:17:22.740 people, how
00:17:25.400 did it work
00:17:25.760 out?
00:17:28.680 How did it
00:17:29.320 work out?
00:17:31.120 Because you
00:17:32.320 know what is
00:17:32.740 conspicuously
00:17:33.580 missing in a
00:17:34.380 story about
00:17:34.900 somebody who's
00:17:35.540 in legal
00:17:36.080 jeopardy?
00:17:37.300 What's
00:17:37.820 conspicuously
00:17:38.680 missing?
00:17:40.380 What was the
00:17:41.360 cost or the
00:17:42.940 outcome of the
00:17:43.840 bad behavior?
00:17:45.360 We know
00:17:46.080 8,600
00:17:46.600 people got a
00:17:47.820 shot and then
00:17:49.120 we can say for
00:17:49.880 sure about the
00:17:50.580 8,600
00:17:51.060 people.
00:17:51.620 What can we
00:17:51.980 say for
00:17:52.340 sure?
00:17:53.480 They did
00:17:54.240 not have
00:17:54.900 vaccination
00:17:55.660 complications.
00:17:57.820 We can say
00:17:58.520 that for sure.
00:17:59.940 We know
00:18:00.340 that the
00:18:00.680 nurse reduced
00:18:01.640 the risk of
00:18:02.580 complications.
00:18:04.180 Now, don't
00:18:05.600 you think they
00:18:06.160 had an
00:18:06.480 obligation to
00:18:07.120 ask if
00:18:07.700 anybody was
00:18:08.560 worse off?
00:18:09.940 Did they
00:18:10.280 have worse
00:18:10.800 outcomes?
00:18:11.920 Did they
00:18:12.380 get COVID
00:18:12.900 and die? 1.00
00:18:15.420 I have a
00:18:16.380 suspicion that
00:18:18.700 the data does
00:18:20.180 not support
00:18:20.860 the prosecution.
00:18:21.760 because if
00:18:24.000 it did, and
00:18:25.340 they actually
00:18:25.760 talked to
00:18:26.260 all 8,600
00:18:26.940 people, because
00:18:28.300 I think they
00:18:28.740 had to talk
00:18:29.220 to the 8,600
00:18:30.100 people to
00:18:31.800 test them for
00:18:32.520 antibodies.
00:18:33.700 They had
00:18:34.440 extended
00:18:34.860 conversations,
00:18:35.840 right?
00:18:36.040 So, isn't
00:18:40.620 that kind of
00:18:41.100 conspicuously
00:18:41.820 missing?
00:18:43.980 I'm just
00:18:44.740 saying.
00:18:45.460 It's just
00:18:45.840 not there.
00:18:47.880 All right.
00:18:48.640 Another amazing
00:18:49.620 story.
00:18:50.080 The news is
00:18:51.600 just full of
00:18:52.220 amazing stories
00:18:53.020 today.
00:18:53.820 There's a
00:18:54.260 whistleblower,
00:18:54.980 Dr.
00:18:55.380 Huff, who
00:18:56.520 worked in
00:18:57.020 the Wuhan
00:18:57.460 lab from
00:18:58.240 2014 to
00:18:59.200 2016,
00:19:00.020 including
00:19:00.320 being vice
00:19:01.700 president at
00:19:02.220 one point.
00:19:02.640 So he's a
00:19:03.040 high-ranking
00:19:04.320 Wuhan lab
00:19:05.800 American who
00:19:07.540 says,
00:19:08.380 absolutely,
00:19:10.660 the U.S.
00:19:11.300 government is
00:19:11.900 to blame for
00:19:12.600 the transfer of
00:19:13.520 dangerous biotech to
00:19:14.960 the Chinese.
00:19:16.460 In other words,
00:19:17.300 America is
00:19:18.700 blaming China,
00:19:20.360 China is 0.85
00:19:20.940 blaming the
00:19:21.900 U.S., and
00:19:23.580 they were both 0.99
00:19:24.320 fucking in on 1.00
00:19:25.200 it. 0.99
00:19:26.600 That's what the
00:19:27.440 whistleblower says.
00:19:28.700 They were in on
00:19:29.580 it together.
00:19:32.420 Ouch.
00:19:34.700 Now, have I
00:19:37.540 told you that
00:19:38.240 every time there's
00:19:39.320 a conspiracy
00:19:39.900 theory, lately
00:19:41.980 it seems we're
00:19:42.680 finding out it's
00:19:43.660 exactly what you
00:19:44.540 thought it was?
00:19:45.140 What's the
00:19:47.400 worst thing you
00:19:48.200 could have
00:19:48.480 assumed about
00:19:49.200 the Wuhan lab?
00:19:50.820 Is the worst
00:19:51.500 thing you could
00:19:52.060 assume that it
00:19:54.600 was all China?
00:19:55.560 It was just
00:19:56.180 China.
00:19:57.220 China did it, 0.99
00:19:58.020 and they're
00:19:58.180 lying about it.
00:19:58.640 Is that the
00:19:59.000 worst thing you
00:19:59.420 could assume?
00:20:00.060 Because that's
00:20:00.480 really bad.
00:20:01.660 That would be
00:20:02.120 bad.
00:20:03.280 Is the worst
00:20:04.060 you could assume
00:20:04.600 it was really
00:20:05.060 America, and
00:20:06.560 we were blaming
00:20:07.280 China, and
00:20:09.040 mostly getting
00:20:09.760 away with it?
00:20:10.340 That'd be bad.
00:20:11.820 I mean, that'd
00:20:12.320 be very, very
00:20:13.000 bad.
00:20:13.340 But you
00:20:14.440 know what
00:20:14.680 would be
00:20:14.960 worse than
00:20:15.460 that?
00:20:16.340 If the
00:20:16.900 United States
00:20:17.500 and China
00:20:18.000 were completely
00:20:18.860 aware that it
00:20:20.200 was both of
00:20:20.800 us, and we
00:20:22.540 just agreed to
00:20:23.240 blame each
00:20:23.720 other so that
00:20:24.240 nobody was
00:20:24.680 quite sure.
00:20:26.480 I feel like it
00:20:27.440 was the worst
00:20:27.960 case scenario.
00:20:29.580 I don't know
00:20:30.280 if it could be
00:20:30.760 any worse.
00:20:32.000 What could be
00:20:32.480 worse?
00:20:33.600 Now, let's
00:20:35.360 back up a little
00:20:35.960 bit.
00:20:36.220 Do you believe
00:20:36.700 the whistleblower?
00:20:38.300 What is the
00:20:39.160 credibility of the
00:20:40.080 whistleblower?
00:20:40.820 It looks like
00:20:41.380 his credentials are
00:20:42.460 solid.
00:20:43.340 It looks like
00:20:44.440 he was in the
00:20:44.900 right place at
00:20:45.460 the right time,
00:20:46.860 roughly, 2016.
00:20:48.320 I don't know if
00:20:48.700 that's the right
00:20:49.120 time.
00:20:52.200 It looks
00:20:52.920 credible to
00:20:53.700 me, but there
00:20:55.440 is one knock
00:20:57.480 against it.
00:20:58.920 It's a pretty
00:20:59.420 big knock.
00:21:00.660 So there's one
00:21:01.340 mark against his
00:21:02.320 credibility.
00:21:03.000 What is it?
00:21:04.220 What's the mark
00:21:05.020 against his
00:21:05.760 credibility?
00:21:06.060 Yeah, follow the
00:21:06.760 money, exactly.
00:21:07.820 He's writing a
00:21:08.480 book.
00:21:08.720 And so here's
00:21:12.220 somebody who's
00:21:12.880 allegedly an
00:21:13.920 American citizen.
00:21:15.540 I say allegedly
00:21:16.580 because he didn't
00:21:17.180 act like one.
00:21:18.640 He didn't act
00:21:19.180 like one.
00:21:19.980 If he waited
00:21:20.800 until now to
00:21:21.760 publish his 1.00
00:21:22.300 fucking book for 1.00
00:21:24.300 us to know what 1.00
00:21:25.020 was going on with
00:21:25.740 the pandemic, I
00:21:27.300 don't trust him
00:21:27.900 at all.
00:21:29.540 He has no
00:21:30.180 credibility in
00:21:30.980 my view.
00:21:32.860 If you're that
00:21:33.740 much of a 1.00
00:21:34.260 whore, you're 1.00
00:21:36.720 not credible. 1.00
00:21:38.240 He could be
00:21:38.660 right.
00:21:39.460 He could be
00:21:39.940 right.
00:21:40.760 Like I'm not
00:21:41.340 saying he's
00:21:41.740 wrong.
00:21:42.420 I'm saying that I
00:21:43.180 wouldn't believe
00:21:43.680 it because this 1.00
00:21:44.320 fucking guy said 1.00
00:21:45.020 it. 1.00
00:21:45.900 Because here's
00:21:46.620 somebody who
00:21:47.020 just threw the
00:21:47.540 whole country
00:21:48.000 under the bus
00:21:48.660 to write a
00:21:49.120 book.
00:21:50.440 Because we
00:21:51.040 kind of needed
00:21:51.540 to know that,
00:21:52.600 if it's true.
00:21:54.540 So I would
00:21:55.580 say credibility
00:21:56.380 low.
00:21:58.280 Low.
00:21:59.160 Unfortunately.
00:22:00.260 I'd love for his
00:22:01.200 credibility to be
00:22:02.260 high.
00:22:02.960 And I don't
00:22:03.380 know if there's
00:22:04.000 any other
00:22:04.600 knock on his
00:22:07.380 credibility.
00:22:08.120 I don't know
00:22:08.500 about his
00:22:08.840 background or
00:22:09.680 his history.
00:22:10.800 But just that
00:22:11.600 one thing.
00:22:13.360 Anytime you hear
00:22:14.160 that somebody
00:22:14.600 saves their
00:22:15.420 blockbuster
00:22:16.280 whistleblower
00:22:17.540 thing for the
00:22:18.220 book, that's
00:22:22.040 just a big hit
00:22:23.200 on your
00:22:23.520 credibility.
00:22:24.540 That's a big
00:22:25.180 hit.
00:22:26.480 So we'll
00:22:27.060 wait on that.
00:22:29.340 I contend
00:22:30.360 that one of
00:22:32.060 the worst
00:22:32.480 things that
00:22:32.980 came out of
00:22:33.440 World War
00:22:33.900 II,
00:22:34.600 aside from
00:22:36.680 60 million
00:22:37.740 people dying,
00:22:39.520 aside from
00:22:40.180 the Holocaust,
00:22:42.180 aside from
00:22:42.820 all of that,
00:22:44.200 there is a
00:22:44.800 ripple effect
00:22:45.360 from World War
00:22:46.000 II that is
00:22:46.560 really, really
00:22:47.400 hurting us.
00:22:48.780 And it's the
00:22:49.180 fact that we
00:22:49.760 can't make any
00:22:50.800 decisions without
00:22:52.280 comparing it to
00:22:53.720 Hitler. 0.57
00:22:55.460 How good is
00:22:56.500 our decision
00:22:57.080 making if we
00:22:57.880 can't make any
00:22:58.520 decisions without
00:22:59.300 the Hitler 0.95
00:22:59.700 analogy?
00:23:01.380 It's completely
00:23:02.400 crippled. 0.99
00:23:03.080 We are
00:23:05.000 permanently under
00:23:05.880 PTSD because
00:23:07.420 all we can see
00:23:08.100 is Hitler 0.88
00:23:08.460 everywhere.
00:23:09.820 It's just
00:23:10.140 Hitler,
00:23:10.500 Hitler,
00:23:10.800 Hitler. 0.57
00:23:11.540 If you can't
00:23:12.320 make any
00:23:12.800 political argument
00:23:13.560 without a
00:23:14.080 Hitler analogy,
00:23:15.280 there's no
00:23:16.160 critical thinking
00:23:16.900 happening at
00:23:17.420 all.
00:23:18.340 You're just
00:23:18.920 Hitlerized. 0.79
00:23:20.380 You're so
00:23:20.880 Hitlerized. 0.79
00:23:21.880 So that's like a
00:23:22.800 permanent PTSD
00:23:23.660 that society has.
00:23:25.080 And it really
00:23:26.840 is hurting us
00:23:27.640 because we
00:23:28.840 can't have
00:23:29.220 anything like
00:23:29.960 an even
00:23:30.620 partially
00:23:32.460 rational discussion
00:23:33.760 if one side
00:23:36.280 is saying,
00:23:36.720 Hitler,
00:23:37.680 Hitler. 0.57
00:23:38.700 We'll get to
00:23:39.560 more of that.
00:23:40.420 More of that
00:23:41.000 later.
00:23:41.960 So Michael
00:23:42.360 Schellenberger is
00:23:43.420 the third
00:23:44.160 independent
00:23:44.920 journalist who
00:23:46.500 got access to
00:23:47.280 the Twitter
00:23:47.620 files.
00:23:49.040 So now we've
00:23:49.560 seen Matt
00:23:51.000 Taibbi and
00:23:52.020 Barry Weiss and
00:23:53.440 now Michael
00:23:53.960 Schellenberger.
00:23:54.900 I assume
00:23:55.540 Musk was the 0.96
00:23:57.020 one who
00:23:57.440 personally
00:23:58.060 selected or
00:23:59.620 approved the
00:24:00.340 journalists because
00:24:02.080 they have
00:24:02.480 something in
00:24:02.980 common.
00:24:04.340 They're all
00:24:04.860 people who at
00:24:05.780 one point were
00:24:06.500 associated with
00:24:07.220 the left who
00:24:08.820 got a little
00:24:09.700 frustrated with
00:24:10.660 the arguments
00:24:11.160 on the left
00:24:11.820 and though you
00:24:13.080 would not call
00:24:13.660 them Republicans
00:24:14.340 because they
00:24:14.940 wouldn't call
00:24:15.380 themselves
00:24:15.760 Republicans,
00:24:17.040 you could say,
00:24:17.860 oh, here are
00:24:18.520 three people that
00:24:19.520 we know can see
00:24:20.200 both sides of
00:24:20.860 an argument.
00:24:22.760 That alone
00:24:23.860 if nothing
00:24:25.700 else comes out
00:24:26.340 of this Twitter
00:24:26.840 stuff, if the
00:24:28.040 only thing that
00:24:28.680 comes out of
00:24:29.140 this is that
00:24:30.280 there were three
00:24:30.920 independent
00:24:31.520 journalists you
00:24:32.320 could believe,
00:24:33.900 and I say
00:24:34.520 believe not
00:24:35.600 because they
00:24:36.480 will get every
00:24:37.160 fact right for
00:24:37.900 the rest of
00:24:38.360 their lives.
00:24:39.400 That's not a
00:24:40.220 realistic expectation,
00:24:41.740 but you could
00:24:42.360 believe them that
00:24:43.040 they're not
00:24:43.540 intending to
00:24:44.500 lie.
00:24:46.320 They're not
00:24:46.740 intending to
00:24:47.600 lie.
00:24:48.680 They're people
00:24:49.400 who have a
00:24:50.000 history of
00:24:50.920 intending to
00:24:51.760 just let you
00:24:52.340 know what's
00:24:53.100 true.
00:24:54.100 That's very
00:24:54.880 big, and I
00:24:56.080 think it's
00:24:56.360 bigger than
00:24:56.880 the Twitter
00:24:57.420 story by far.
00:24:59.300 Imagine, if
00:25:00.040 you will, and
00:25:01.240 it could be
00:25:01.640 that the
00:25:02.160 whole substack
00:25:03.140 situation is
00:25:05.880 really positive
00:25:07.660 because it
00:25:08.340 could create a
00:25:09.080 virtual,
00:25:10.340 independent
00:25:10.840 journalism,
00:25:11.760 I guess it
00:25:12.200 has, virtual
00:25:13.440 independent
00:25:13.920 journalism tool
00:25:15.620 that the
00:25:17.020 public might
00:25:17.600 actually go
00:25:18.360 to for some
00:25:19.060 good information.
00:25:20.920 So something
00:25:21.520 really good is
00:25:22.220 developing there.
00:25:22.860 Anyway, so
00:25:23.840 Schellenberger, who
00:25:24.760 has my highest
00:25:25.760 confidence for
00:25:27.000 being an
00:25:27.720 independent
00:25:28.120 journalist, he
00:25:31.520 reports, he
00:25:32.120 was at task
00:25:33.120 with only
00:25:33.580 reporting for
00:25:34.140 the few days,
00:25:35.680 I think, around
00:25:36.520 right after
00:25:37.080 January 6th, and
00:25:38.880 one of the big
00:25:39.400 things we found
00:25:40.160 is that a
00:25:41.880 number of people
00:25:42.420 were calling for
00:25:43.520 Trump to be
00:25:44.540 kicked off the
00:25:45.060 platform, including
00:25:46.640 Michelle Obama,
00:25:48.240 Obama, and
00:25:49.880 I think the
00:25:51.020 ADL and
00:25:51.900 some others.
00:25:53.240 So there were
00:25:53.720 calls for him
00:25:54.400 to be kicked
00:25:55.060 off.
00:25:56.400 So here are
00:25:57.280 the people we
00:25:58.340 know Twitter
00:25:59.680 targeted, and
00:26:00.700 you can help me
00:26:01.460 fill in the
00:26:01.960 blanks.
00:26:02.860 We know
00:26:03.380 Twitter targeted
00:26:04.340 Trump, Dan
00:26:06.740 Bongino,
00:26:10.920 the libs of
00:26:13.080 TikTok, James
00:26:15.460 Wood, and who
00:26:17.800 else?
00:26:20.280 Jordan?
00:26:20.960 I didn't see
00:26:21.560 that, but
00:26:22.080 oh, Charlie
00:26:23.040 Kirk, Charlie
00:26:24.840 Kirk.
00:26:27.300 Who else is
00:26:28.240 confirmed?
00:26:30.200 Babylon Bee,
00:26:31.380 well, we know
00:26:31.840 that, right?
00:26:33.740 Matt
00:26:34.240 Gates, is
00:26:34.720 Matt
00:26:34.960 Gates
00:26:35.180 confirmed?
00:26:36.420 Roger Stone
00:26:37.140 confirmed?
00:26:37.740 I haven't seen
00:26:38.200 those confirmed.
00:26:40.120 Confirmed.
00:26:41.260 Could you send
00:26:41.740 me, if there's
00:26:43.040 anything that
00:26:43.540 confirms other
00:26:44.440 people, like
00:26:45.540 Matt Gates
00:26:46.100 and Stone,
00:26:46.780 could you
00:26:47.660 send that?
00:26:48.320 Oh, Breitbart
00:26:48.860 is confirmed.
00:26:51.060 Breitbart's.
00:26:52.200 MGT, is she 0.98
00:26:53.120 confirmed?
00:26:54.420 I mean, there's
00:26:54.980 things we saw in
00:26:55.620 the public, but
00:26:57.760 have we confirmed
00:26:58.740 it from the
00:26:59.200 Twitter files that
00:27:00.020 they were
00:27:00.460 targeted?
00:27:01.420 Okay.
00:27:02.540 Oh, you'll send
00:27:03.260 me Matt
00:27:03.600 Gates?
00:27:03.780 thank you.
00:27:05.040 So,
00:27:05.560 so here's the
00:27:10.420 thing.
00:27:13.880 Oh, there's so
00:27:14.620 many angles to
00:27:15.280 this.
00:27:15.620 Let's take the
00:27:16.460 Yoel Roth
00:27:17.280 angle first.
00:27:18.380 As you know,
00:27:19.360 Yoel Roth was
00:27:20.300 in charge of who
00:27:21.620 got banned on
00:27:22.840 Twitter, and he
00:27:24.100 seemed to be
00:27:24.720 operating somewhat
00:27:26.040 independently with
00:27:27.120 at least one other
00:27:27.960 executive, and
00:27:29.460 maybe Jack Dorsey
00:27:30.760 wasn't in the loop
00:27:31.940 on some of this
00:27:32.560 stuff.
00:27:32.820 So, so we know
00:27:33.700 that there was
00:27:35.000 stuff happening
00:27:35.660 outside of Jack
00:27:36.900 Dorsey's direct
00:27:38.760 control, or direct
00:27:40.780 intervention or
00:27:41.840 something, I guess.
00:27:43.160 So that much we
00:27:44.040 know.
00:27:46.720 But it turns out
00:27:48.140 that Yoel Roth,
00:27:50.560 when he was, I
00:27:51.720 think, working on
00:27:52.400 his PhD, wrote a
00:27:54.560 paper, and I'm
00:27:55.300 going to be very
00:27:55.780 careful about how I
00:27:56.800 talk about this.
00:27:57.700 He wrote a paper
00:28:00.040 about the app
00:28:01.540 Grindr, and I
00:28:03.280 don't know what
00:28:04.160 the bigger topic
00:28:04.820 was, but the part
00:28:06.040 we know about.
00:28:07.060 He talked about
00:28:07.720 the app Grindr, 0.80
00:28:08.880 which is for gay 0.97
00:28:09.880 people to do 0.99
00:28:10.600 hookups.
00:28:12.560 And he mentioned
00:28:13.500 that there were
00:28:14.420 underage people who
00:28:16.500 were not legally
00:28:17.420 allowed on the app,
00:28:18.680 but they would
00:28:19.140 sneak on.
00:28:19.720 So there were a
00:28:20.200 lot of young
00:28:20.720 people under 18
00:28:21.780 on the app.
00:28:22.800 In his paper, he
00:28:26.800 asked the question,
00:28:29.080 should we only be
00:28:31.500 working on getting
00:28:32.220 them off the app,
00:28:33.560 or is there a way
00:28:34.600 to take into
00:28:35.600 consideration that
00:28:37.480 they're going to
00:28:37.900 get on the app no
00:28:38.660 matter what, and
00:28:40.260 that maybe you
00:28:40.880 should treat them
00:28:41.780 in some way that's
00:28:42.680 better for society?
00:28:44.560 Is there any
00:28:45.200 positive way to
00:28:46.880 make it better
00:28:47.640 keeping underage 1.00
00:28:49.280 people on a sex
00:28:50.320 app?
00:28:50.580 Now, from a
00:28:54.000 purely academic
00:28:55.260 perspective, is
00:28:57.720 that a fair
00:28:58.180 question?
00:28:59.320 From a purely
00:29:00.420 academic perspective,
00:29:01.940 which is the
00:29:02.660 context, is that a
00:29:04.180 fair question?
00:29:05.660 Yes, it is.
00:29:06.500 Of course it is.
00:29:07.600 It's a fair
00:29:08.160 question.
00:29:08.720 Because the
00:29:09.180 question is, how
00:29:09.800 do you reduce
00:29:10.500 harm to
00:29:11.720 children?
00:29:13.720 And I don't
00:29:14.900 think he had a
00:29:15.940 conclusion.
00:29:17.200 I think he said,
00:29:18.080 we have to at
00:29:19.080 least be realistic
00:29:19.840 and say, they're
00:29:21.380 already being
00:29:21.960 harmed.
00:29:23.080 Is there anything
00:29:23.660 you can do to
00:29:24.300 help?
00:29:26.260 All right.
00:29:28.220 My sound is good
00:29:29.300 on my end, so if
00:29:30.160 there's something
00:29:30.540 happening, I can't
00:29:32.580 control it.
00:29:34.880 So, all right.
00:29:38.460 So, somebody
00:29:41.240 researched that and
00:29:42.660 found out that that
00:29:43.460 was in his
00:29:44.080 background.
00:29:44.580 And then, Elon
00:29:47.500 Musk actually
00:29:48.580 tweeted it.
00:29:50.400 Elon Musk actually
00:29:51.540 tweeted that it
00:29:54.040 explains a lot.
00:29:56.040 It explains a lot
00:29:57.560 that the guy in
00:29:58.380 charge of who gets
00:29:59.320 kicked off the
00:30:00.400 system had written
00:30:02.980 a paper questioning
00:30:04.460 whether children
00:30:05.660 should be on a
00:30:06.320 sex app. 0.90
00:30:07.820 Now, remember,
00:30:08.720 Twitter was also
00:30:09.700 being accused of
00:30:11.240 not taking seriously
00:30:12.380 enough, the 0.95
00:30:13.680 pedophiles that
00:30:14.480 were active on
00:30:15.240 Twitter.
00:30:18.220 So, you see
00:30:19.660 that this all
00:30:20.280 ends up looking
00:30:21.260 like the same
00:30:21.880 thing.
00:30:23.040 So, I would
00:30:25.080 like to point
00:30:26.120 out that Elon
00:30:28.260 Musk now holds
00:30:29.340 the record for
00:30:31.200 the most extreme
00:30:32.460 firing of an
00:30:33.540 employee I've
00:30:34.340 ever seen.
00:30:36.600 Sometimes you
00:30:37.380 just get fired. 0.53
00:30:38.920 Oh, we have to
00:30:39.740 downsize.
00:30:40.260 I'm sorry.
00:30:41.480 You'll have to
00:30:42.000 go.
00:30:42.800 Bad enough.
00:30:43.800 That's a bad
00:30:44.400 day.
00:30:45.420 But imagine
00:30:45.960 being fired and
00:30:47.820 then within a
00:30:48.520 week, the person
00:30:49.860 who fired you
00:30:50.560 outs you on
00:30:51.540 Twitter as 0.96
00:30:52.720 pedophile friendly.
00:30:55.440 That is more
00:30:56.480 fired than anybody
00:30:58.120 has ever been
00:30:58.980 fired.
00:31:00.100 You can't get
00:31:00.780 fired harder
00:31:01.580 than that.
00:31:02.920 Now, let me
00:31:04.020 very quickly say
00:31:06.200 that there is no
00:31:07.780 accusation that
00:31:10.060 Yoel Roth was
00:31:11.580 involved in any
00:31:12.400 way with any
00:31:13.700 underage promotion
00:31:15.680 of kids or
00:31:16.780 activity, right?
00:31:17.940 There is no, no,
00:31:19.360 no evidence that
00:31:21.380 he personally is
00:31:22.580 friendly with any
00:31:25.540 pedo stuff, right?
00:31:26.640 I want to be as
00:31:27.420 clear as possible.
00:31:28.520 I don't think he's
00:31:29.520 been accused and
00:31:31.260 there's no evidence
00:31:31.900 I've seen that would
00:31:32.700 suggest it
00:31:33.220 whatsoever.
00:31:33.580 You're worried, but
00:31:36.100 that's a different
00:31:36.640 subject.
00:31:38.720 But it does seem
00:31:39.680 to be true that
00:31:42.080 someone with a
00:31:43.320 documented
00:31:44.440 background of
00:31:46.060 being, let's say,
00:31:47.280 flexible, flexible
00:31:50.560 with underage
00:31:51.800 stuff was in
00:31:54.340 charge of making
00:31:54.960 sure there wasn't
00:31:55.620 any on, or at
00:31:57.240 least he was one
00:31:57.740 of the people who
00:31:58.700 could have been
00:31:59.180 involved in getting
00:32:00.460 rid of the pedo
00:32:01.620 stuff on Twitter.
00:32:02.240 Now, that's about
00:32:03.720 as bad as you
00:32:04.660 can, that's like
00:32:05.920 the worst situation
00:32:06.700 you can even
00:32:07.100 imagine.
00:32:09.120 But the fact that
00:32:10.620 Musk actually
00:32:11.740 tweeted that out,
00:32:14.840 I've, that's the
00:32:16.460 most aggressive
00:32:17.200 firing I've ever
00:32:19.420 seen in my life.
00:32:20.860 I've never seen
00:32:21.460 anybody fired
00:32:22.080 harder than that.
00:32:23.280 That's as fired
00:32:24.280 as you can get.
00:32:26.260 Wow.
00:32:26.820 Wow.
00:32:27.700 So,
00:32:27.920 here's a question.
00:32:35.340 Did Jack Dorsey
00:32:36.960 lie to Congress?
00:32:38.200 I just watched
00:32:38.760 the clip of it.
00:32:41.460 And he was
00:32:43.920 asked if, let's
00:32:46.000 see, what was the
00:32:46.460 exact question?
00:32:50.260 Does Twitter, quote,
00:32:52.940 try to censor
00:32:53.940 conservative voices?
00:32:55.140 Does Twitter censor
00:32:59.640 conservative voices?
00:33:02.120 And Jack said, no.
00:33:04.180 And he was sitting
00:33:04.840 right next to the
00:33:05.620 person who was in
00:33:06.320 charge of the
00:33:07.940 censoring.
00:33:09.240 Is that a lie?
00:33:12.440 Well, what would be
00:33:13.400 the evidence, what
00:33:14.640 would be the evidence
00:33:15.500 that Twitter censors
00:33:17.860 conservatives?
00:33:18.740 What's the evidence
00:33:19.520 we've seen so far?
00:33:20.420 We've seen Trump,
00:33:23.880 you know, Kirk,
00:33:25.100 Bongino, and they're
00:33:26.840 all Republicans,
00:33:28.360 right?
00:33:29.120 Or at least
00:33:29.800 conservatives.
00:33:31.640 True or false,
00:33:32.700 100% of the people
00:33:33.760 we know have been
00:33:34.600 targeted, that we
00:33:35.280 know, just the ones
00:33:36.780 we know, are all
00:33:38.380 conservatives.
00:33:39.120 True.
00:33:40.220 True, right?
00:33:40.920 Is it also true that
00:33:42.800 each of them had a
00:33:44.480 specific terms of
00:33:46.280 service infraction or
00:33:49.920 could be interpreted
00:33:51.560 as an infraction?
00:33:52.760 Is that true or
00:33:53.320 not?
00:33:56.380 Berenson was not
00:33:57.900 conservative, but he
00:33:58.780 was certainly siding
00:33:59.660 with them in this.
00:34:04.500 No?
00:34:05.280 Yes?
00:34:05.940 False?
00:34:06.980 All right.
00:34:08.220 So, here's the
00:34:09.460 question.
00:34:10.900 In terms of a
00:34:12.640 courtroom, if
00:34:14.620 somebody says, I
00:34:15.500 have 10 examples of
00:34:17.380 conservatives who
00:34:18.360 were banned, but we
00:34:20.720 used an excuse in
00:34:22.220 each case, there
00:34:23.620 was like a specific
00:34:24.560 harm that we
00:34:27.420 called out that
00:34:29.060 these 10 people
00:34:29.900 were engaged in.
00:34:32.040 So, does that
00:34:32.540 prove, if you know
00:34:34.020 that those 10
00:34:34.680 things are true, or
00:34:36.580 even 20, whatever
00:34:38.180 it is, if you know
00:34:39.220 that there are 10
00:34:39.900 absolutely confirmed
00:34:41.220 cases where people
00:34:42.820 were shadowbanned,
00:34:44.700 does that mean that
00:34:46.360 they had a policy of
00:34:47.620 shadowbanning
00:34:48.280 conservatives, if you
00:34:49.720 knew those were all
00:34:50.660 true, all 10 of
00:34:51.480 them, and you knew
00:34:53.000 that there was no
00:34:53.800 example, not one
00:34:54.660 example, of a
00:34:56.320 Democrat being
00:34:57.400 ...
00:34:57.700 Unfortunately, it's
00:35:00.080 just examples.
00:35:01.380 It's just examples.
00:35:03.340 Right?
00:35:04.140 And those examples
00:35:05.400 could be explained
00:35:06.520 another way just as
00:35:08.780 easily.
00:35:09.120 So, one
00:35:11.640 explanation is that
00:35:12.640 Twitter conspired and
00:35:14.440 were consciously
00:35:15.160 trying to suppress
00:35:16.920 conservatives, and
00:35:18.440 everything that
00:35:19.140 happened looks
00:35:19.700 exactly like that,
00:35:20.680 right?
00:35:21.660 Well, I definitely
00:35:22.760 would agree that
00:35:24.180 what we've seen looks
00:35:25.260 exactly like that's
00:35:26.480 true, but
00:35:27.980 suggestive of.
00:35:30.520 In other words,
00:35:31.060 there's nothing that's
00:35:31.800 counterfactual to it.
00:35:33.780 There's nothing that
00:35:34.560 rules it out, and
00:35:35.840 it certainly looks
00:35:36.440 exactly like it.
00:35:38.240 But the evidence we
00:35:39.900 have only supports
00:35:42.140 that they acted that
00:35:43.880 way, which is
00:35:45.720 different than a
00:35:46.360 policy.
00:35:47.620 And why would they
00:35:48.580 act that way unless
00:35:49.620 they had a policy?
00:35:51.440 Why would everybody
00:35:52.480 act the same way
00:35:53.720 unless there was a
00:35:55.180 policy?
00:35:56.440 And the answer is
00:35:57.300 more obvious than a
00:35:58.400 policy, because they
00:35:59.780 were all Democrats.
00:36:01.260 They just had the
00:36:01.960 same worldview.
00:36:03.300 So when they looked
00:36:04.060 for harm, they all
00:36:05.780 saw it in the same
00:36:06.480 place.
00:36:06.880 And when they
00:36:08.480 looked for harm
00:36:09.180 caused by Democrats,
00:36:10.620 they just didn't
00:36:11.160 see it.
00:36:12.340 So their job was to
00:36:13.520 get rid of harm, so
00:36:15.360 they got rid of the
00:36:16.020 harm they could see,
00:36:17.620 which to them was
00:36:19.160 all a bunch of
00:36:19.900 conservative stuff.
00:36:21.360 They did not get
00:36:22.360 rid of the harm that
00:36:23.120 they didn't see,
00:36:24.620 because to them it
00:36:25.380 didn't look harmful.
00:36:27.320 And so would that
00:36:29.180 be considered Twitter
00:36:31.380 having a, let's say,
00:36:33.300 a policy of
00:36:35.180 discriminating against
00:36:36.880 conservatives.
00:36:38.260 Because if Jack
00:36:39.200 says, no, we don't
00:36:40.180 have a policy, I
00:36:43.000 don't see anything
00:36:43.860 that says that's a
00:36:44.740 lie.
00:36:46.360 Because no document
00:36:47.600 has said, let's get
00:36:48.840 these conservatives.
00:36:50.600 No person has, no
00:36:52.060 person has testified
00:36:53.540 that, yes, we were
00:36:55.120 after conservatives.
00:36:55.960 So you have no
00:36:57.940 testimony and no
00:36:59.620 documents that would
00:37:01.620 refute what Jack
00:37:02.820 said in Congress.
00:37:04.660 There's no
00:37:05.260 counterfactual.
00:37:06.660 The only evidence
00:37:08.080 you have is not
00:37:09.520 conclusive, it's
00:37:10.840 anecdotal.
00:37:12.500 Anecdotal evidence
00:37:13.540 has no legal value,
00:37:17.340 really, unless there's
00:37:19.120 just tons of it, and
00:37:20.000 then you can make a
00:37:21.560 case based on
00:37:23.320 circumstantial evidence.
00:37:24.620 But this is not even
00:37:26.340 close to that level.
00:37:28.520 This is one anecdote
00:37:29.620 that's just repeated.
00:37:32.720 Now, imagine a jury
00:37:34.700 trial.
00:37:36.140 Imagine you took just
00:37:37.340 what you have now and
00:37:38.180 you didn't learn
00:37:38.640 anything else, and you
00:37:39.380 took it to a jury.
00:37:40.760 You said, hey, jury,
00:37:42.000 we found all these
00:37:43.000 cases of conservatives
00:37:44.280 being suppressed and
00:37:46.100 no cases of anybody
00:37:47.220 else being suppressed.
00:37:48.740 So there's our case.
00:37:51.120 And then what does
00:37:52.660 the jury say?
00:37:53.540 In their minds, they
00:37:55.120 say, well, where's
00:37:56.840 this information come
00:37:57.760 from?
00:37:58.860 How do we know it's
00:37:59.640 just ten conservatives?
00:38:01.340 Who told us?
00:38:02.660 Oh, three people who
00:38:04.480 are identified as being
00:38:05.820 friendly to the right
00:38:06.940 told us that the left
00:38:10.160 was discriminating.
00:38:11.280 That's how you know?
00:38:12.720 Your source is only
00:38:13.820 people on the right
00:38:14.780 looked at things you
00:38:16.560 haven't looked at and
00:38:17.380 we can't see.
00:38:18.360 We don't know if they
00:38:19.380 skipped anything.
00:38:20.320 We just know that
00:38:21.940 they only told us
00:38:23.380 about the people on
00:38:24.720 the right, which is
00:38:25.440 exactly what people
00:38:27.040 who lean right would
00:38:28.000 tell you.
00:38:29.840 You see that you
00:38:30.900 can never get a
00:38:31.520 conviction based on
00:38:34.860 what you have now.
00:38:36.660 Right?
00:38:38.360 Now, I'm definitely
00:38:40.300 not telling you that
00:38:42.180 I know whether Twitter
00:38:43.440 did or did not, you
00:38:44.740 know, collude or
00:38:45.980 scheme to take down
00:38:47.720 Democrats or take
00:38:49.520 down Republicans.
00:38:50.560 I don't know.
00:38:51.920 Anything, you know,
00:38:52.940 certainly we found
00:38:54.100 anything's possible.
00:38:55.520 Like every other news
00:38:56.660 story teaches this
00:38:58.320 lesson.
00:38:59.960 You know those people
00:39:00.780 you thought you could
00:39:01.520 trust?
00:39:02.500 Not so much.
00:39:03.920 That's like every news
00:39:04.960 story.
00:39:06.060 Every news story is the
00:39:07.020 same.
00:39:08.040 So, I'd like to talk
00:39:11.640 to you about the bad
00:39:12.660 arguments on my team.
00:39:15.180 My team is the
00:39:16.480 following.
00:39:16.820 My team is anybody
00:39:19.260 who thinks that
00:39:20.960 Twitter did some
00:39:22.680 things that were
00:39:23.380 bad, at least in
00:39:25.300 terms of the outcome,
00:39:26.680 and would like to
00:39:27.420 know more about it
00:39:28.220 and thinks we need to
00:39:29.380 be kind of aggressive
00:39:30.460 in getting to the
00:39:31.560 bottom of it.
00:39:32.400 That's my team.
00:39:33.720 And my team also
00:39:34.640 thinks that there
00:39:35.220 are probably some bad
00:39:36.040 things that happened.
00:39:37.280 Right?
00:39:37.760 But what I don't like
00:39:39.080 is when people who
00:39:40.400 agree with me on the
00:39:41.360 big picture have
00:39:42.960 arguments that are
00:39:43.800 absurd.
00:39:44.160 So, I'm going to
00:39:45.840 talk about the people
00:39:46.560 who agree with me
00:39:47.620 that Twitter did a
00:39:49.560 bad thing and we
00:39:50.280 need to figure out
00:39:51.020 how to stop it and
00:39:52.280 know what happened.
00:39:54.560 Don't do the
00:39:55.380 following arguments.
00:39:57.800 I don't like the
00:39:58.860 argument that Jack
00:40:00.460 lied to Congress
00:40:01.460 because we don't
00:40:02.300 have evidence of
00:40:03.040 that.
00:40:03.780 We have evidence
00:40:04.540 that he said
00:40:05.260 things.
00:40:06.660 We have only
00:40:07.320 evidence that he
00:40:08.000 talked.
00:40:09.440 Evidence that
00:40:10.120 somebody talked
00:40:11.120 and said something
00:40:12.440 you didn't think
00:40:13.240 they should have
00:40:14.140 said is not
00:40:14.880 evidence of a
00:40:16.080 crime.
00:40:17.700 We don't know
00:40:18.480 why he knew,
00:40:19.620 right?
00:40:20.060 Because that's
00:40:20.520 important.
00:40:21.540 What did Jack
00:40:22.200 know?
00:40:23.260 Because there's
00:40:23.980 plenty of evidence
00:40:24.820 in the documentation
00:40:25.880 that he was not
00:40:27.160 brought into all
00:40:28.040 of the decisions.
00:40:29.560 He was brought
00:40:30.240 into the top ones
00:40:31.020 but not all of them.
00:40:33.720 So, I don't like
00:40:34.760 the argument that
00:40:35.540 Jack lied unless
00:40:36.740 you have some
00:40:37.240 evidence.
00:40:38.440 And there's no
00:40:38.960 evidence he lied.
00:40:39.780 It might be true 1.00
00:40:41.860 but no evidence
00:40:43.240 has been presented.
00:40:44.920 So, that's a
00:40:45.480 weak argument.
00:40:47.340 Which could turn
00:40:48.220 into a strong
00:40:49.640 argument if we had
00:40:50.400 different information
00:40:51.300 but with what we
00:40:52.080 have.
00:40:53.140 How about this
00:40:53.700 one?
00:40:54.300 People said,
00:40:55.640 I noted that it
00:40:57.640 appeared from the
00:40:58.360 internal documentation
00:40:59.280 that the people who
00:41:01.080 worked at Twitter
00:41:01.700 believed they were
00:41:02.720 doing something good
00:41:03.820 for the country.
00:41:04.800 Would you agree?
00:41:06.440 Now, it's not
00:41:07.520 your opinion but from
00:41:09.600 what we've seen,
00:41:10.480 doesn't it look like
00:41:11.200 they thought they
00:41:11.800 were doing the
00:41:12.240 right thing?
00:41:15.220 And then people
00:41:16.040 said to me,
00:41:16.820 Scott, Scott, Scott,
00:41:18.600 oh, you were so
00:41:19.460 in the wrong place
00:41:20.860 on this.
00:41:22.020 It doesn't matter
00:41:22.840 what they thought.
00:41:23.720 Why?
00:41:24.280 Why doesn't it
00:41:25.200 matter what they
00:41:25.880 were thinking?
00:41:27.520 Why is it
00:41:28.240 irrelevant that they
00:41:29.180 thought they were
00:41:29.800 doing the right
00:41:30.380 thing?
00:41:32.740 Go ahead, say it.
00:41:35.100 Say it.
00:41:37.240 Say it.
00:41:37.900 Say it.
00:41:39.600 There you go.
00:41:40.880 Thank you.
00:41:42.620 Hitler. 0.57
00:41:45.440 Because we're
00:41:46.740 poisoned by Hitler
00:41:47.900 analogies, we can't
00:41:50.240 think of this
00:41:50.700 correctly.
00:41:52.000 We don't have the
00:41:53.140 capability to look at
00:41:54.520 this situation in any
00:41:56.500 rational way because
00:41:58.200 we're all crippled.
00:41:59.920 We're all crippled by
00:42:01.340 Hitler. 0.57
00:42:02.340 It's all we can see.
00:42:03.460 If all you see is
00:42:05.700 Hitler in this 0.77
00:42:06.420 situation, you're
00:42:08.440 not putting any
00:42:10.260 kind of critical
00:42:10.940 thought on it.
00:42:12.100 You're just 0.99
00:42:12.600 Hitler poisoned. 0.74
00:42:14.200 So anybody who
00:42:15.860 brings up Hitler in 0.99
00:42:17.520 any situations that's
00:42:18.760 not literally,
00:42:19.840 actually the
00:42:20.460 Holocaust, they 1.00
00:42:22.900 just have Hitler 0.92
00:42:23.600 poisoning, and you 0.95
00:42:24.780 should ignore
00:42:25.240 everything they say.
00:42:26.920 It's just Hitler 0.97
00:42:27.840 poisoning.
00:42:28.240 Now, some people
00:42:30.340 said to me, Scott, it
00:42:32.280 doesn't matter that
00:42:33.180 they had good
00:42:33.820 intentions in their
00:42:34.760 own mind, right?
00:42:36.660 It only matters how
00:42:37.920 they acted because
00:42:39.560 of the Hitler 0.94
00:42:40.840 argument.
00:42:42.300 Those Nazis thought
00:42:43.380 they were doing maybe
00:42:44.420 something good for the
00:42:45.320 world.
00:42:45.640 So, just like
00:42:48.420 Nazis, right?
00:42:49.860 Twitter employees,
00:42:51.240 Nazis, exactly the
00:42:52.980 same.
00:42:53.440 They thought they
00:42:54.040 were doing something
00:42:54.720 good, but you
00:42:55.440 can't excuse them
00:42:59.300 for that, can you?
00:43:00.740 Because I was told
00:43:01.860 that people's
00:43:03.160 intentions are
00:43:04.380 irrelevant.
00:43:05.900 If what they do is
00:43:07.160 evil, they must be
00:43:08.780 held accountable for
00:43:09.600 the evil.
00:43:10.520 Their internal
00:43:11.180 thoughts are
00:43:11.740 irrelevant to that,
00:43:12.560 right?
00:43:13.220 Would everybody
00:43:13.700 agree with that?
00:43:14.300 That it's what
00:43:15.720 they do that
00:43:16.400 matters, it's not
00:43:17.820 what they're
00:43:18.120 thinking.
00:43:18.640 Their internal
00:43:19.140 intentions, and
00:43:20.240 would you agree
00:43:20.760 that internal
00:43:21.560 intentions don't
00:43:23.160 have any role in
00:43:24.860 the legal system?
00:43:27.000 Would you agree
00:43:27.580 that the legal
00:43:28.140 system does not
00:43:29.640 care what your
00:43:30.360 internal thinking
00:43:31.180 is?
00:43:31.500 It only cares
00:43:31.940 what you did,
00:43:33.000 right?
00:43:33.900 And that's why
00:43:35.060 we treat self-defense
00:43:36.680 the same as
00:43:37.880 murder. 0.79
00:43:39.080 So, if you kill 0.98
00:43:40.100 somebody in self-defense, 0.99
00:43:41.320 let's say you blow 1.00
00:43:41.900 their head off, 1.00
00:43:42.920 that's why they put
00:43:43.860 you in jail for
00:43:44.980 exactly the same
00:43:45.900 amount as if you 0.96
00:43:47.480 murdered them with 0.81
00:43:48.340 premeditation. 0.88
00:43:49.740 Because your
00:43:50.420 intention doesn't
00:43:51.080 make any difference
00:43:51.740 in the legal
00:43:52.240 system.
00:43:53.080 It only matters 1.00
00:43:53.720 that you killed 1.00
00:43:54.180 somebody.
00:43:56.520 What?
00:43:57.960 What?
00:43:59.080 Oh, you're saying
00:43:59.880 that those are
00:44:00.340 treated differently.
00:44:02.040 Oh, oh.
00:44:03.380 So, now you're
00:44:04.180 changing your
00:44:04.660 opinion that the
00:44:06.280 intention of the
00:44:07.140 act actually is
00:44:08.120 completely determinative
00:44:09.720 of how you're
00:44:10.900 treated.
00:44:11.180 Huh.
00:44:13.860 Please, don't
00:44:18.280 tell me that the
00:44:19.000 intention doesn't
00:44:19.900 matter.
00:44:21.040 The intention is
00:44:21.840 all that matters.
00:44:23.300 It's all that
00:44:23.920 matters.
00:44:25.620 For understanding
00:44:26.780 how to deal
00:44:27.940 with it, how to
00:44:28.520 fix it, whether
00:44:29.940 or not there's any
00:44:30.720 legal repercussions,
00:44:32.600 the intention is
00:44:34.200 all that matters.
00:44:35.600 It's, like, way,
00:44:36.480 way the most
00:44:37.120 important thing.
00:44:37.760 Because, um, in
00:44:44.000 all likelihood, in
00:44:46.440 all likelihood, what
00:44:47.600 we've found out so
00:44:48.560 far is exactly what
00:44:50.460 Jack Dorsey told
00:44:51.700 you a year ago.
00:44:54.220 A year ago, Jack
00:44:55.620 Dorsey told you we
00:44:56.680 have too many
00:44:57.460 Democrats, and so
00:44:59.020 we're probably acting
00:44:59.920 like Democrats when
00:45:02.240 we're making
00:45:02.660 decisions.
00:45:03.180 I mean, I'm
00:45:04.980 paraphrasing, but he
00:45:05.840 said that directly, and
00:45:07.460 I think probably more
00:45:08.220 than once.
00:45:09.540 He, he, even Jack
00:45:10.900 Dorsey said, whoa, 0.98
00:45:11.860 whoa, whoa, we've
00:45:12.300 got too many lefties
00:45:13.140 here, so we're
00:45:14.460 acting like a lefty
00:45:15.460 organization, when
00:45:16.940 that was never the
00:45:17.680 point of it.
00:45:18.620 Like, he didn't
00:45:19.240 approve of it.
00:45:20.160 He used that as a
00:45:21.640 criticism of his own
00:45:22.920 entity, that it was
00:45:24.800 too lefty.
00:45:26.160 Now, here are two
00:45:28.540 possibilities to how
00:45:29.980 everything you saw
00:45:31.140 could happen.
00:45:32.540 One possibility, it
00:45:34.240 was an explicit
00:45:35.120 Twitter policy to
00:45:37.180 suppress conservatives,
00:45:39.280 and that would fit
00:45:40.000 everything you've
00:45:40.680 seen.
00:45:41.600 Would you agree?
00:45:43.100 A hundred percent of
00:45:44.000 what you've seen so
00:45:44.720 far would be
00:45:45.340 compatible with that
00:45:46.260 theory, that they
00:45:47.540 were actually,
00:45:48.960 literally, knowingly
00:45:50.540 just suppressing
00:45:52.440 opinions they didn't
00:45:53.780 like.
00:45:55.580 Totally fits the
00:45:56.620 facts.
00:45:57.800 Here's something
00:45:58.580 else that fits the
00:45:59.340 facts.
00:45:59.680 nothing like that
00:46:01.600 was happening, but
00:46:02.960 they were all
00:46:03.440 Democrats, and so
00:46:05.480 they just saw the
00:46:06.200 world through a
00:46:06.760 Democrat lens.
00:46:08.120 When they looked at
00:46:09.060 Trump, they saw 0.99
00:46:09.960 a monster.
00:46:11.420 When they looked at,
00:46:12.480 I don't know,
00:46:14.020 grooming, as you
00:46:15.600 would say, grooming
00:46:16.900 in schools, maybe
00:46:18.540 they just saw
00:46:19.300 progressive sexual
00:46:21.240 education.
00:46:22.680 It didn't look
00:46:23.520 dangerous to them.
00:46:24.900 Maybe when you saw
00:46:25.800 Antifa, you saw a
00:46:27.540 domestic terror group,
00:46:28.580 maybe they saw
00:46:30.260 protesters for
00:46:31.980 Black Lives Matter,
00:46:34.140 like, you know,
00:46:34.780 good people and a
00:46:35.940 good cause.
00:46:37.340 Couldn't you get to
00:46:38.260 the same place?
00:46:40.340 Wouldn't everything
00:46:41.440 you've seen be
00:46:42.220 explained just by
00:46:43.460 having lots of
00:46:44.080 Democrats there?
00:46:45.640 Couldn't you explain
00:46:46.400 all of it with
00:46:48.080 that?
00:46:49.480 Because you can,
00:46:50.960 very easily.
00:46:52.600 There's no stretch,
00:46:53.820 there's no spin,
00:46:55.380 there's no pretzel
00:46:56.600 logic, it's just
00:46:58.060 right down the
00:46:58.640 middle.
00:46:59.960 How about everybody
00:47:00.940 was a Democrat and
00:47:01.980 so they acted like
00:47:02.760 Democrats?
00:47:06.000 Or, it's a big old
00:47:07.600 conspiracy and they
00:47:09.300 were secretly trying
00:47:10.200 to change the country
00:47:11.120 but yet it didn't
00:47:12.280 show up in any of
00:47:12.960 their documentation and
00:47:14.040 there's not a single
00:47:14.760 whistleblower, not a 0.79
00:47:16.320 single whistleblower
00:47:17.260 says, yeah, we talked
00:47:18.860 about it, we were just
00:47:19.600 trying to put down the
00:47:20.940 conservatives.
00:47:22.060 Not one?
00:47:23.140 There's not one
00:47:23.800 whistleblower in all of
00:47:24.780 Twitter.
00:47:26.020 Really?
00:47:27.260 Not one whistleblower
00:47:28.540 to say, oh yeah, we
00:47:30.120 actually just talked
00:47:30.880 about this privately
00:47:31.740 and it was just all
00:47:33.020 about suppressing.
00:47:34.180 Not one.
00:47:36.640 Now, maybe we get
00:47:37.740 one.
00:47:39.080 Now, and I want to
00:47:39.700 be as clear as
00:47:40.740 possible, later when
00:47:42.600 you tell me I'm
00:47:43.420 wrong, if new
00:47:45.320 information comes up,
00:47:46.860 no, you're wrong
00:47:47.540 again.
00:47:48.120 That would be you
00:47:48.780 being wrong twice.
00:47:50.460 If new information
00:47:51.820 comes out, then I
00:47:53.440 might change my
00:47:54.100 opinion, based on
00:47:55.780 the new information.
00:47:57.200 That's not wrong.
00:47:58.300 I'm telling you we
00:47:59.180 don't know what's
00:48:00.940 going on because we
00:48:01.680 don't have the
00:48:02.120 information.
00:48:02.680 So don't act like
00:48:03.520 you know when you
00:48:04.840 don't know.
00:48:06.680 Right?
00:48:07.360 So if later we
00:48:08.380 know, then I'll say,
00:48:09.540 oh yeah, now we
00:48:10.100 know.
00:48:11.840 All right.
00:48:16.940 All right.
00:48:19.520 And so we've not
00:48:20.460 seen any direct
00:48:21.200 evidence that
00:48:21.980 Twitter was
00:48:23.380 targeting
00:48:24.360 conservatives.
00:48:25.400 We've seen
00:48:25.980 anecdotes, which
00:48:27.040 are very convincing
00:48:28.120 and could mean
00:48:30.200 that they had said
00:48:30.820 it directly, but
00:48:32.420 we're short of
00:48:32.940 that standard.
00:48:38.300 Let's see.
00:48:41.960 And more to
00:48:42.760 that point.
00:48:46.620 What is your
00:48:47.460 point of view on
00:48:48.060 the following three
00:48:48.760 things?
00:48:49.120 If you complained
00:48:50.120 that the 2020
00:48:50.940 election looked
00:48:51.800 rigged, are you
00:48:53.700 trying to protect
00:48:54.640 the public or
00:48:55.400 destroy it?
00:48:56.540 No.
00:48:57.440 The people who
00:48:58.820 said 2020 was
00:48:59.780 rigged, were they
00:49:02.340 trying to protect
00:49:03.080 the republic or
00:49:04.440 destroy it?
00:49:07.140 Sort of the point
00:49:07.980 of view, isn't it?
00:49:09.460 People on the right
00:49:10.580 say they're
00:49:10.980 protecting it.
00:49:11.640 People on the left
00:49:12.220 say they're
00:49:12.620 destroying it.
00:49:13.200 How about if 0.96
00:49:15.500 you were a
00:49:16.120 January 6er and
00:49:17.960 you protested, were
00:49:19.100 you trying to
00:49:19.780 overthrow the
00:49:20.460 republic or were
00:49:21.660 you trying to
00:49:22.060 protect it?
00:49:23.100 Were you trying to
00:49:23.660 overthrow the
00:49:24.260 republic or protect
00:49:26.040 it?
00:49:27.600 Conservatives would
00:49:28.260 say protect.
00:49:29.740 Democrats would 0.89
00:49:30.400 say overthrow.
00:49:33.140 And likewise, if
00:49:34.200 you were Twitter,
00:49:34.900 were you trying to
00:49:35.500 protect the public
00:49:36.260 or were you trying
00:49:36.780 to rig an election?
00:49:37.600 If you were the
00:49:39.600 Twitter employees,
00:49:40.440 were you trying to
00:49:40.900 protect the country
00:49:41.740 or a Reagan
00:49:42.300 election?
00:49:45.080 Both.
00:49:46.520 Maybe both.
00:49:48.380 Yeah, maybe both.
00:49:49.780 Those are not
00:49:50.460 really separable.
00:49:52.500 There's news that
00:49:53.600 Trump turned down
00:49:54.880 a prisoner swap
00:49:55.920 for that arms
00:49:57.340 dealer I talked
00:49:58.000 about, Victor
00:49:58.560 Bout, for just
00:50:00.220 Paul Whelan.
00:50:01.220 So before the
00:50:01.840 WNBA player was
00:50:03.060 nabbed, Trump
00:50:04.900 had the offer of
00:50:06.600 the arms dealer
00:50:07.320 for the ex-Marine
00:50:09.440 and he turned it
00:50:10.920 down, according
00:50:12.440 to John Bolton.
00:50:14.400 Is John Bolton
00:50:15.400 an accurate source
00:50:16.880 for Trump-related
00:50:18.620 behind-the-scenes
00:50:19.500 information?
00:50:20.260 No.
00:50:20.800 No, he's not.
00:50:22.100 No.
00:50:22.680 So there may be
00:50:23.700 some context here
00:50:24.640 that's missing.
00:50:26.500 Now, I would not
00:50:28.460 be surprised if he
00:50:29.680 turned down the
00:50:30.300 deal.
00:50:31.740 But there's a
00:50:32.800 big difference
00:50:34.120 between that
00:50:35.820 and, you know,
00:50:38.420 the simple version
00:50:39.320 we're hearing.
00:50:40.000 There may be more
00:50:40.820 to it.
00:50:41.880 So I don't know.
00:50:42.840 Could be technically
00:50:43.600 true, but missing
00:50:44.880 some detail.
00:50:47.260 All right.
00:50:47.920 Here's some really
00:50:48.880 interesting events.
00:50:51.060 You might know that
00:50:52.040 Carrie Lake has
00:50:52.720 filed a lawsuit
00:50:53.480 about the midterms
00:50:54.600 and her Arizona
00:50:56.340 situation.
00:50:56.920 and part of her
00:51:00.220 filing includes
00:51:02.580 the claim that
00:51:04.800 they got an
00:51:05.720 expert on voting
00:51:07.000 machines and
00:51:07.980 they specifically
00:51:08.640 got an expert
00:51:09.520 on these kinds
00:51:17.300 of voting
00:51:17.680 machines.
00:51:19.020 All right.
00:51:19.300 So Carrie Lake
00:51:20.220 gets an expert on
00:51:22.220 these kinds of
00:51:23.060 voting machines.
00:51:23.680 And the expert
00:51:24.740 says that the
00:51:26.400 mass problems
00:51:27.260 they had with
00:51:27.740 the voting
00:51:28.080 machines on
00:51:28.680 election day
00:51:29.300 could not have
00:51:31.040 been created
00:51:31.880 unintentionally.
00:51:36.280 What?
00:51:39.000 From a technical
00:51:40.200 perspective, it
00:51:41.560 couldn't have been
00:51:42.200 an accident.
00:51:44.320 Now, that's
00:51:46.180 one of those
00:51:46.700 opinions that,
00:51:48.760 you know, you
00:51:49.160 could imagine
00:51:49.680 another expert
00:51:50.440 saying, oh,
00:51:50.880 yeah, it could
00:51:51.820 be an accident.
00:51:52.540 Let me explain
00:51:53.140 how.
00:51:53.940 So you can
00:51:54.420 imagine there
00:51:54.980 might be a
00:51:55.380 counter to
00:51:55.800 that.
00:51:56.980 But that's
00:51:57.480 the claim.
00:51:58.680 Somebody with
00:51:59.300 extensive knowledge
00:52:00.320 of those
00:52:00.720 specific machines
00:52:01.780 says that
00:52:02.840 exact problem
00:52:03.700 could not be
00:52:04.380 happening by
00:52:05.260 accident.
00:52:06.340 That that
00:52:06.780 could only
00:52:07.320 happen by a
00:52:08.080 human intervention
00:52:08.880 intentionally.
00:52:12.040 Now, of
00:52:12.880 course, this
00:52:13.480 is not proof.
00:52:14.880 This is just
00:52:15.600 the evidence
00:52:16.200 being offered
00:52:16.980 up.
00:52:17.900 But here's
00:52:18.760 what's interesting.
00:52:19.520 Rich Barris,
00:52:20.880 who on Twitter
00:52:21.800 goes by the
00:52:22.760 People's
00:52:23.200 Pundit, and
00:52:23.920 he was very
00:52:24.380 involved in
00:52:25.020 the election
00:52:26.100 irregularity claims.
00:52:28.060 And he tweeted
00:52:28.560 this, and I
00:52:29.420 don't know if
00:52:29.780 you could have,
00:52:30.520 maybe you
00:52:30.960 couldn't have
00:52:31.240 done this a
00:52:32.020 year ago, but
00:52:32.960 he said the
00:52:33.340 2022 Arizona
00:52:35.040 midterm elections
00:52:35.960 were not
00:52:37.100 conducted
00:52:37.640 legitimately.
00:52:38.720 Now, keep in
00:52:39.160 mind he said
00:52:39.640 that on Twitter.
00:52:41.660 Could you say
00:52:42.460 that on Twitter
00:52:43.440 a year ago?
00:52:46.440 Could you?
00:52:47.000 I feel like
00:52:49.180 you would have 0.99
00:52:49.460 been kicked
00:52:49.800 off, right?
00:52:50.540 Kicked off
00:52:50.940 of Twitter.
00:52:51.920 But there it
00:52:52.380 is.
00:52:53.020 But then he
00:52:53.520 follows it up,
00:52:54.360 and I think
00:52:54.720 this gives it
00:52:55.560 a little extra
00:52:56.120 weight.
00:52:56.680 He says, I
00:52:57.500 have no
00:52:57.860 problem extending
00:52:58.740 invites to
00:52:59.580 publicly debate
00:53:01.500 me over the
00:53:02.160 fact.
00:53:03.120 All fake
00:53:03.700 gurus are
00:53:05.120 welcome to
00:53:05.620 apply.
00:53:06.880 A word of
00:53:07.500 caution.
00:53:08.060 This is from
00:53:08.580 Rich Barris.
00:53:09.740 He says, you're
00:53:10.360 not as smart as
00:53:11.060 you think you
00:53:11.600 are, and I'm
00:53:12.200 going to 0.84
00:53:12.540 embarrass you.
00:53:13.180 That's a
00:53:16.620 pretty gutsy
00:53:17.760 claim, isn't
00:53:18.540 it?
00:53:19.160 Now, how
00:53:20.060 long have I
00:53:20.620 been saying
00:53:21.660 we need some
00:53:22.680 kind of a
00:53:23.480 national level
00:53:25.200 debate show,
00:53:27.100 a podcast or
00:53:28.040 live stream,
00:53:29.020 where outside of
00:53:30.660 the government
00:53:31.140 we can actually
00:53:32.660 have a real
00:53:33.280 debate without
00:53:34.720 weird time
00:53:35.420 limits where
00:53:36.040 people just
00:53:36.620 talk until
00:53:37.680 the time's
00:53:38.080 up, and
00:53:38.860 have actually
00:53:39.460 maybe people
00:53:40.620 fact-checking,
00:53:41.860 like a real
00:53:42.540 debate.
00:53:43.440 Where the
00:53:43.880 point of it
00:53:44.300 is not to
00:53:44.720 win the
00:53:45.080 debate, the
00:53:46.460 point of it
00:53:46.940 is to find
00:53:47.420 out what's
00:53:47.780 true, which
00:53:49.100 would look
00:53:49.500 different than
00:53:49.980 a debate.
00:53:50.700 Debates are
00:53:51.320 artificial contests
00:53:52.540 that are not
00:53:53.680 designed to
00:53:55.240 tell you what's
00:53:55.720 true.
00:53:56.760 It's an
00:53:57.320 artificial contest.
00:53:58.900 What you want
00:53:59.480 is something to
00:54:00.020 help you know
00:54:00.600 what's true.
00:54:01.580 So the debate
00:54:02.320 would be sort
00:54:03.460 of the surface
00:54:04.000 level, but
00:54:05.340 below that you
00:54:06.040 need to have
00:54:06.460 the experts and
00:54:07.380 researchers sitting
00:54:08.240 right there at
00:54:09.080 the same time,
00:54:10.340 and then when
00:54:10.840 somebody makes a
00:54:11.500 claim, they
00:54:12.520 also are
00:54:12.900 clacking away
00:54:13.480 on their
00:54:13.760 laptops, and
00:54:15.000 then they
00:54:15.300 go, okay, you
00:54:16.420 made this
00:54:16.840 following claim.
00:54:18.140 Here's a study
00:54:18.820 that backs you.
00:54:20.120 Here's a study
00:54:20.740 that debunks
00:54:21.920 you.
00:54:22.840 Here's what's
00:54:23.440 good and bad
00:54:23.920 about those two
00:54:24.600 studies.
00:54:25.960 Then we know
00:54:26.680 something.
00:54:28.900 Then we would
00:54:29.780 know something.
00:54:31.920 But the people
00:54:32.480 I don't want to
00:54:33.140 see debate, or
00:54:33.900 I just saw
00:54:34.400 Newt Gingrich and
00:54:36.520 Ann Coulter did
00:54:37.700 some debate
00:54:38.360 against some
00:54:39.240 Democrats.
00:54:40.460 I don't want to
00:54:41.000 see that.
00:54:42.340 Because as soon
00:54:42.880 as you put Newt
00:54:43.480 Gingrich or Ann
00:54:44.160 Coulter, it's all
00:54:45.340 about them.
00:54:47.120 It's no longer
00:54:48.020 about the issue,
00:54:48.700 it's about those
00:54:49.220 two people.
00:54:50.160 You can't have
00:54:50.760 that kind of
00:54:51.340 person trying to
00:54:53.060 tell you what's
00:54:53.600 true, because
00:54:54.640 they're too
00:54:55.580 identifiable with
00:54:57.400 a position.
00:54:58.580 You want somebody
00:54:59.380 who looks like
00:54:59.980 they don't care
00:55:00.600 which way it
00:55:01.100 ends up.
00:55:02.180 Someone who
00:55:02.980 legitimately says,
00:55:04.280 you know, I'm
00:55:05.200 just following the
00:55:05.800 facts.
00:55:06.160 So wherever
00:55:07.080 this lands, it
00:55:07.860 lands, and then
00:55:08.960 we'll deal with
00:55:09.540 it, because I
00:55:09.920 just want what's
00:55:10.540 good for the
00:55:10.960 country.
00:55:11.640 You want people
00:55:12.180 like that.
00:55:13.400 People who can
00:55:13.880 actually change
00:55:14.520 their mind in
00:55:15.040 public.
00:55:16.120 You want somebody
00:55:16.900 who's so
00:55:17.420 intellectually honest
00:55:18.660 that if they
00:55:19.700 lost a debate
00:55:20.600 in public, they
00:55:21.920 would say it.
00:55:23.420 Like right in
00:55:24.220 front of you.
00:55:25.740 That would be a
00:55:26.640 rare person.
00:55:28.080 A very rare
00:55:28.920 person.
00:55:29.500 Oh yeah, you
00:55:30.040 just, basically
00:55:31.080 you just wiped
00:55:32.200 the floor with
00:55:33.240 me.
00:55:33.860 Yeah, you won
00:55:34.360 that debate.
00:55:35.480 Yep, that
00:55:36.040 point you
00:55:36.380 made, I
00:55:36.760 had not
00:55:37.040 considered, and
00:55:37.700 that changes
00:55:38.480 my mind.
00:55:39.900 Surely there
00:55:40.700 are some
00:55:41.080 people like
00:55:41.560 that somewhere
00:55:42.120 in the world.
00:55:42.780 It would be
00:55:43.020 good to see
00:55:43.440 them debate.
00:55:45.240 So I
00:55:46.920 would like
00:55:49.200 to boost
00:55:50.280 Rich Baris'
00:55:51.300 offer, and I
00:55:53.840 do think he
00:55:54.360 knows enough
00:55:54.820 that he would
00:55:55.060 be a good
00:55:55.660 person to
00:55:56.480 have the
00:55:56.960 debate.
00:55:57.700 Now I
00:55:58.020 don't know
00:55:58.380 him personally,
00:55:59.920 but what I've
00:56:01.320 been following
00:56:01.940 suggests that
00:56:02.760 he's fact-based.
00:56:03.760 so fact-based
00:56:05.900 that I
00:56:06.340 could imagine,
00:56:07.620 I don't
00:56:07.940 know it, but
00:56:08.620 I could
00:56:09.480 imagine that
00:56:11.460 if he were in
00:56:12.060 a debate and
00:56:12.640 he lost, that
00:56:14.300 he might
00:56:14.580 actually just
00:56:15.020 say it.
00:56:15.900 Oh yeah, did
00:56:17.180 my best, these
00:56:18.640 claims look like
00:56:19.480 they were pretty
00:56:20.560 suspicious, but
00:56:21.420 now your argument
00:56:22.240 makes sense, and
00:56:23.060 I accept that.
00:56:24.640 I think he
00:56:25.220 could do it.
00:56:26.360 Now, that's
00:56:27.540 pretty optimistic,
00:56:28.640 isn't it?
00:56:30.160 Do you
00:56:30.620 think I
00:56:30.940 could do
00:56:31.220 it?
00:56:32.320 Do you
00:56:32.800 think I
00:56:33.140 could be in
00:56:33.720 a debate in
00:56:34.260 which I was
00:56:34.620 really strongly
00:56:35.360 held a
00:56:35.780 position, but
00:56:37.040 in the course
00:56:37.620 of the debate
00:56:38.260 in public, could
00:56:40.040 I change my
00:56:40.700 mind if I
00:56:41.460 got undebated?
00:56:42.660 Yes, I
00:56:43.060 could.
00:56:43.880 Yes, I
00:56:44.400 could do
00:56:44.620 that.
00:56:45.640 Yep.
00:56:46.780 I could do
00:56:47.420 that right in
00:56:47.960 front of you.
00:56:48.900 And the
00:56:49.360 reason I
00:56:49.740 could do
00:56:50.000 it is I've
00:56:50.480 created a
00:56:51.340 brand that
00:56:53.040 allows it.
00:56:54.440 So I
00:56:55.040 would not be
00:56:55.660 going counter to
00:56:58.400 my self-image
00:56:59.260 or the image
00:56:59.920 that you have
00:57:00.480 of me if I
00:57:01.540 changed my
00:57:02.120 mind in
00:57:02.560 public.
00:57:03.400 In fact, that
00:57:03.980 would be on
00:57:04.540 brand, wouldn't
00:57:05.500 it?
00:57:06.340 For me, that
00:57:06.900 would be totally
00:57:07.420 on brand.
00:57:09.040 Alan Dershowitz,
00:57:10.040 same thing.
00:57:10.720 I just saw his
00:57:11.240 name in the
00:57:11.680 comments.
00:57:12.420 If Alan
00:57:12.860 Dershowitz did
00:57:13.700 a public
00:57:14.120 debate and
00:57:15.540 somebody bested
00:57:16.520 him in the
00:57:17.020 debate, I
00:57:18.880 believe he
00:57:19.600 would say it.
00:57:21.080 And he would
00:57:21.480 say it before
00:57:21.920 the debate was
00:57:22.760 over.
00:57:23.600 I think he'd
00:57:24.080 say, you know
00:57:24.440 what?
00:57:25.060 I came here
00:57:25.820 honestly thinking
00:57:26.800 I had the
00:57:27.280 stronger argument.
00:57:28.680 After 60
00:57:29.620 minutes of
00:57:30.060 hearing the
00:57:30.380 other side, I
00:57:31.000 actually changed
00:57:31.580 my mind.
00:57:32.500 And I think
00:57:32.860 you should
00:57:33.180 consider that
00:57:34.180 that was a
00:57:36.000 superior argument.
00:57:38.560 Dershowitz could
00:57:39.220 say that.
00:57:39.840 Do you know
00:57:40.140 why?
00:57:41.700 Because he's
00:57:43.000 created a brand
00:57:43.760 for himself where
00:57:44.560 that's allowed.
00:57:46.260 Geraldo could do
00:57:46.920 it too.
00:57:47.860 Geraldo could do
00:57:48.580 that because he
00:57:49.500 also has a
00:57:50.020 brand where he
00:57:51.460 can say, oh,
00:57:52.880 I'm going to
00:57:53.620 follow the
00:57:54.120 information.
00:57:55.940 Yeah.
00:57:56.040 But do you
00:57:57.720 notice how few
00:57:58.460 people you
00:57:59.000 could come
00:57:59.760 up with that
00:58:01.380 you would trust
00:58:02.120 could change
00:58:03.040 their mind right
00:58:04.720 in front of
00:58:05.140 you?
00:58:05.820 Very, very
00:58:06.620 small number of
00:58:07.340 people.
00:58:08.100 And the only
00:58:08.540 reason they
00:58:09.020 could is because
00:58:10.720 they've created
00:58:11.660 the brand
00:58:12.900 expectation that
00:58:14.080 there are people
00:58:14.520 who can follow
00:58:15.180 the data wherever
00:58:16.400 it goes.
00:58:17.400 Even at the risk
00:58:19.020 of embarrassment
00:58:19.660 and even at
00:58:20.840 the risk of
00:58:21.640 personal whatever.
00:58:24.620 I see Victor
00:58:25.520 David Hansen
00:58:26.300 being mentioned.
00:58:27.520 I'm going to
00:58:27.980 question that
00:58:28.620 one, not
00:58:29.760 because of
00:58:30.920 any criticism
00:58:31.720 of him, but
00:58:33.100 because I'm
00:58:33.640 not aware of
00:58:34.460 anything he's
00:58:36.380 done that's
00:58:36.840 counter to,
00:58:38.000 let's say,
00:58:40.720 the rights
00:58:41.140 narrative.
00:58:42.380 If he has
00:58:43.200 that background,
00:58:45.600 then yes,
00:58:46.380 you would add
00:58:46.820 him to the
00:58:47.200 list.
00:58:48.200 But I'm not
00:58:48.820 aware of it.
00:58:49.660 Tim Poole,
00:58:54.420 somebody
00:58:54.780 suggests, maybe.
00:58:56.020 I don't know.
00:59:02.720 Offer to
00:59:03.360 debate Trump
00:59:03.900 on persuasion.
00:59:05.040 Well, I don't
00:59:05.700 think he and
00:59:06.160 I would debate
00:59:06.720 anything.
00:59:08.420 You know,
00:59:08.900 Greenwald is
00:59:09.780 now,
00:59:11.860 Greenwald may
00:59:12.740 have passed
00:59:13.400 too far into
00:59:14.440 the right
00:59:16.540 leaning part
00:59:17.700 of the world.
00:59:18.200 it's been a
00:59:20.480 long time
00:59:20.960 since I saw
00:59:21.540 Greenwald
00:59:22.100 disagree with
00:59:23.120 the right.
00:59:24.960 It's been a
00:59:25.680 long time.
00:59:28.040 And while I
00:59:29.380 have ultimate
00:59:30.460 respect for
00:59:31.980 Greenwald's
00:59:32.660 reporting, even
00:59:33.440 though I don't
00:59:33.840 like him
00:59:34.180 personally,
00:59:34.820 which I think
00:59:36.580 is important
00:59:37.040 to say,
00:59:37.880 because I think
00:59:38.600 that helps my
00:59:39.320 credibility,
00:59:40.240 I don't like
00:59:40.920 Greenwald
00:59:41.280 personally,
00:59:42.480 because he
00:59:42.940 once tried to
00:59:44.660 slap me down
00:59:45.280 on Twitter,
00:59:46.080 and I
00:59:46.600 didn't think
00:59:47.200 it was a
00:59:47.700 legitimate.
00:59:48.880 So I just
00:59:49.760 have a personal
00:59:50.320 grudge against
00:59:51.020 him, because
00:59:52.140 he's basically 1.00
00:59:52.920 a dick. 0.99
00:59:54.380 But the work 1.00
00:59:55.360 that he does,
00:59:56.120 I think is so
00:59:57.080 valuable for the
00:59:57.900 country, that I
00:59:59.480 have ultimate
01:00:00.440 respect for his
01:00:01.380 professional work.
01:00:03.240 He just might be 0.99
01:00:04.000 sort of a dick. 0.99
01:00:05.400 But I'm pretty 0.99
01:00:06.940 sure that's
01:00:09.400 common to a lot
01:00:10.140 of people.
01:00:11.220 Maybe even me.
01:00:12.080 Maybe even
01:00:13.820 me.
01:00:20.220 Why do you
01:00:20.800 believe the
01:00:21.140 assessment of
01:00:21.640 who, they're
01:00:23.980 all subjective?
01:00:25.720 Well, it's not a
01:00:26.620 question of who
01:00:27.180 I'd believe.
01:00:28.680 It's a question
01:00:29.540 of, are there
01:00:30.760 some people that
01:00:32.520 you know could
01:00:33.980 change their
01:00:34.600 opinion in front
01:00:35.480 of you?
01:00:36.820 And I think
01:00:37.500 there are some
01:00:37.860 people that you
01:00:38.400 could know that
01:00:38.920 with some
01:00:39.260 certainty, and
01:00:40.300 I'm one of
01:00:40.760 them.
01:00:41.460 And I think
01:00:41.860 Dershowitz is
01:00:42.500 another.
01:00:43.700 You know, when
01:00:44.200 you say Tim
01:00:44.800 Poole, you're
01:00:45.740 starting to get
01:00:46.380 into, I don't
01:00:46.920 know, I would
01:00:48.420 like to think
01:00:48.980 you would.
01:00:50.000 Like, I have a
01:00:50.600 general positive
01:00:51.280 feeling about
01:00:51.900 Tim Poole, so I
01:00:53.220 think maybe you
01:00:53.760 would.
01:00:54.520 But I think that
01:00:55.260 Dershowitz is a
01:00:56.100 guarantee, and I
01:00:57.900 think I'm a
01:00:58.360 guarantee, because
01:01:00.040 we've both done
01:01:00.680 it.
01:01:01.000 We've both done
01:01:01.580 it in public.
01:01:04.220 Tucker changed
01:01:04.860 on the rack.
01:01:05.520 Yeah, years
01:01:06.180 later.
01:01:07.300 Years later.
01:01:08.220 You know, that's
01:01:09.200 an interesting one.
01:01:09.940 Could Tucker
01:01:11.040 change his
01:01:11.660 mind in real
01:01:13.060 time?
01:01:13.500 He changed his
01:01:14.140 mind in Iraq, but
01:01:15.720 that seemed to be
01:01:16.300 after the fact.
01:01:19.900 Could Joe
01:01:20.720 Rogan?
01:01:21.640 Joe Rogan
01:01:22.260 could.
01:01:23.300 Yeah, Joe
01:01:23.720 Rogan could.
01:01:24.620 Could Russell
01:01:25.320 Brand?
01:01:26.000 Yes.
01:01:27.320 Could Steve
01:01:27.840 Crowder?
01:01:28.580 Hmm, there's an
01:01:29.500 interesting one.
01:01:31.160 I don't know.
01:01:32.480 I have no reason
01:01:33.400 to think he
01:01:33.940 couldn't, but
01:01:35.180 that's different
01:01:35.700 from saying there's
01:01:36.580 evidence to suggest
01:01:37.820 that he would.
01:01:40.360 That's a little
01:01:41.000 bit different.
01:01:41.840 Because there are
01:01:42.280 a number of
01:01:42.620 people I would
01:01:43.020 say, well, I
01:01:43.600 have no reason to
01:01:44.320 think they
01:01:44.660 wouldn't change
01:01:45.420 their mind, but
01:01:46.480 they don't have
01:01:46.880 any history of
01:01:47.600 it that I'm
01:01:48.920 aware of.
01:01:50.500 How about
01:01:51.040 Jon Stewart?
01:01:52.540 Yeah.
01:01:53.860 Yep, he could.
01:01:54.920 Jon Stewart
01:01:55.420 could.
01:01:56.740 Tulsi could, of
01:01:57.660 course.
01:02:00.080 Yeah.
01:02:00.620 Isn't it
01:02:01.040 interesting, though?
01:02:01.760 I feel like we
01:02:02.500 need almost a
01:02:04.260 separate category
01:02:05.460 for people who
01:02:07.400 could change
01:02:12.420 their mind.
01:02:14.580 Doesn't it seem
01:02:15.420 like that's
01:02:15.840 something useful?
01:02:18.240 Because if you
01:02:19.080 listen to people
01:02:19.920 who can't change
01:02:20.620 their mind, what
01:02:21.260 are you listening
01:02:21.720 to?
01:02:22.560 You're not
01:02:23.060 listening to
01:02:23.580 anything useful.
01:02:25.300 You're listening
01:02:25.780 to propaganda.
01:02:28.360 Yeah, the
01:02:29.040 Weinsteins, two
01:02:30.540 good examples.
01:02:32.140 The Weinsteins
01:02:32.760 based on, I
01:02:34.380 believe, just
01:02:35.060 intellectual
01:02:36.220 honesty.
01:02:38.240 I think they
01:02:38.880 just have a
01:02:39.320 higher principle
01:02:40.880 for intellectual
01:02:41.620 honesty, so I
01:02:42.340 think they
01:02:42.600 would go
01:02:42.900 wherever the
01:02:43.480 data went.
01:02:47.260 That's my
01:02:47.920 impression.
01:02:50.500 Dr. Drew,
01:02:51.480 same thing.
01:02:52.160 Dr. Drew,
01:02:52.880 he has a
01:02:54.880 history of
01:02:55.840 being able to
01:02:56.500 take a hit
01:02:57.400 by not saying
01:02:58.940 the popular
01:02:59.660 thing.
01:03:00.580 So he's got
01:03:01.080 a long history
01:03:01.680 of going where
01:03:03.260 he feels the
01:03:04.060 data is going.
01:03:04.900 So that's a
01:03:05.320 good one.
01:03:10.240 Yeah.
01:03:11.220 All right.
01:03:11.620 Well, I
01:03:12.760 don't want to
01:03:13.240 mention too
01:03:14.560 many names.
01:03:17.080 And I see
01:03:18.000 all of you
01:03:18.540 clankers.
01:03:19.740 I do see
01:03:20.420 your comments.
01:03:22.100 It's just not
01:03:22.860 something I want
01:03:23.440 to interact
01:03:23.860 with.
01:03:26.740 All right.
01:03:27.700 So, but I
01:03:29.560 do see your
01:03:29.960 comments.
01:03:30.300 So if you
01:03:31.440 thought you
01:03:31.800 weren't being
01:03:32.220 seen, I
01:03:32.920 can tell you
01:03:34.280 that you
01:03:34.600 are being
01:03:34.920 seen.
01:03:37.320 All right.
01:03:39.860 Then Carrie
01:03:40.680 Lake responded
01:03:42.020 to Rich
01:03:42.720 Barris saying
01:03:43.260 he wanted to
01:03:43.820 do a public
01:03:44.440 debate.
01:03:45.380 She said,
01:03:45.960 I'd pay to
01:03:46.400 watch this
01:03:46.860 debate.
01:03:48.800 Now, isn't
01:03:51.700 that the
01:03:52.720 thing?
01:03:55.840 I would pay
01:03:56.800 to watch
01:03:57.280 this debate.
01:03:57.980 I would
01:03:58.100 pay to watch
01:03:59.160 this debate.
01:04:00.300 I would
01:04:01.180 pay to watch
01:04:01.680 that debate.
01:04:04.440 I would
01:04:05.040 pay actual
01:04:05.660 money, 10
01:04:08.100 bucks.
01:04:09.760 But I
01:04:10.300 definitely pay
01:04:10.800 a dollar.
01:04:13.120 You don't
01:04:13.900 think there's
01:04:14.280 any podcaster
01:04:15.180 who's willing
01:04:16.420 to host a
01:04:17.080 debate that
01:04:18.720 people, probably
01:04:19.540 a million people
01:04:20.320 would pay a
01:04:20.780 dollar for.
01:04:22.080 To do, you
01:04:22.920 know, two
01:04:23.220 hours of work
01:04:23.880 and you make
01:04:24.300 a million
01:04:24.640 dollars.
01:04:25.100 somebody's
01:04:30.000 saying that
01:04:30.500 sticks and
01:04:31.080 hammer clarified
01:04:31.900 within 48
01:04:33.040 hours so I
01:04:33.700 should unblock
01:04:34.380 him.
01:04:37.660 What's the
01:04:38.340 clarification
01:04:39.340 could there
01:04:40.080 be?
01:04:41.020 If I think
01:04:41.840 he's a 1.00
01:04:42.200 dick, how 1.00
01:04:44.020 do you
01:04:44.280 clarify that?
01:04:46.360 I don't know.
01:04:47.040 I'm not
01:04:49.020 interested.
01:04:52.040 He didn't
01:04:52.700 mean to
01:04:53.060 insult me.
01:04:54.380 No, he
01:04:54.740 meant to be
01:04:55.260 condescending.
01:04:58.060 He wrote
01:04:58.900 something which
01:04:59.900 was clearly
01:05:00.480 intended to be
01:05:01.280 condescending.
01:05:01.880 Yeah, it
01:05:07.980 takes one to
01:05:08.460 know one.
01:05:09.040 Yeah, that's
01:05:10.680 true.
01:05:11.560 It takes one to
01:05:12.460 know one.
01:05:14.140 All right.
01:05:15.180 No, so
01:05:15.860 here's the
01:05:16.220 thing.
01:05:17.120 It wasn't his
01:05:17.940 first offense
01:05:18.680 and when
01:05:21.640 people speak
01:05:22.880 to me in a
01:05:23.480 condescending
01:05:24.080 way, I
01:05:25.440 have a right
01:05:25.980 to take
01:05:27.620 them out of
01:05:28.080 my attention
01:05:29.980 span forever.
01:05:31.880 It doesn't
01:05:33.080 matter to me
01:05:33.600 that he
01:05:34.400 doesn't like
01:05:34.980 it.
01:05:35.840 That's not
01:05:36.200 really.
01:05:37.560 Be a man.
01:05:39.440 Be a man.
01:05:41.060 All right,
01:05:41.320 here's a good
01:05:41.660 question.
01:05:43.420 Is it more
01:05:43.960 manly just to
01:05:44.700 make your
01:05:45.040 decision and
01:05:45.640 move on?
01:05:46.800 Or is it
01:05:47.580 more manly to
01:05:48.360 keep revisiting
01:05:49.300 your decision?
01:05:50.720 Which is
01:05:51.140 more manly?
01:05:53.320 I don't think
01:05:54.140 anything's more
01:05:54.700 manly.
01:05:58.440 Let me give
01:05:59.800 you a little
01:06:00.100 micro lesson
01:06:00.800 about something.
01:06:01.620 I think that
01:06:02.160 maybe this
01:06:03.240 applies.
01:06:05.600 How many
01:06:06.300 of you have
01:06:07.140 the following
01:06:07.760 philosophy of
01:06:08.600 life?
01:06:09.680 And I'll
01:06:10.060 give you the
01:06:10.600 alternative.
01:06:11.800 The first
01:06:12.380 philosophy is
01:06:13.100 once you've
01:06:13.640 made a
01:06:13.960 decision,
01:06:14.900 you just
01:06:15.940 move on.
01:06:17.580 And there
01:06:18.040 are other
01:06:18.240 people who
01:06:18.580 make a
01:06:18.880 decision,
01:06:19.380 but it's
01:06:19.580 never really
01:06:20.100 made.
01:06:20.860 It's always
01:06:21.340 revisited
01:06:22.020 forever.
01:06:23.300 Maybe,
01:06:23.920 maybe,
01:06:24.520 maybe,
01:06:24.800 maybe,
01:06:25.380 right?
01:06:28.020 I take the
01:06:29.300 decision and
01:06:30.120 move on.
01:06:31.400 And then
01:06:31.780 when somebody
01:06:32.240 says you
01:06:32.620 made a
01:06:32.980 wrong decision
01:06:33.840 and here's
01:06:34.320 why,
01:06:35.500 even if I
01:06:36.200 believe them,
01:06:37.480 I move on
01:06:38.140 anyway.
01:06:39.980 I move on
01:06:40.900 anyway.
01:06:41.380 And that's
01:06:41.860 really hard to
01:06:42.720 explain.
01:06:45.140 Other people
01:06:45.800 do.
01:06:46.120 And I'm not
01:06:46.740 even sure if
01:06:47.280 it's rational.
01:06:48.660 it's just
01:06:50.640 that my
01:06:51.000 experience of
01:06:51.720 life is
01:06:52.820 that moving
01:06:53.340 forward is
01:06:54.300 always better
01:06:54.780 than not.
01:06:56.580 And that as
01:06:57.320 soon as you're
01:06:57.840 in your
01:06:58.320 analysis paralysis,
01:07:00.160 that's all
01:07:00.860 bad.
01:07:01.680 But moving
01:07:02.320 forward the
01:07:02.960 wrong way can
01:07:04.520 at least help
01:07:05.120 you adjust.
01:07:06.040 You know,
01:07:06.260 if you run
01:07:06.720 into a wall,
01:07:07.380 you adjust.
01:07:08.280 But I
01:07:08.700 always say,
01:07:09.980 okay,
01:07:10.220 we're done
01:07:10.600 with that
01:07:10.900 decision.
01:07:11.800 And it's
01:07:12.360 really hard if
01:07:13.440 you're making
01:07:14.220 decisions with
01:07:15.100 women, 1.00
01:07:16.040 like a
01:07:16.440 partner.
01:07:16.780 because women 0.99
01:07:18.560 will often
01:07:19.020 say accurately,
01:07:20.560 oh, new
01:07:21.280 information has
01:07:22.100 emerged, let's
01:07:23.740 go re-look at
01:07:24.840 this decision.
01:07:26.160 And then I
01:07:26.700 say, I don't
01:07:27.620 go backwards.
01:07:29.580 I'm going to
01:07:30.160 make a new
01:07:30.640 problem with my
01:07:31.480 new decision and
01:07:32.240 then I'll fix
01:07:32.680 that because
01:07:33.880 that's in the
01:07:34.340 future.
01:07:35.440 But I'm not
01:07:36.040 going to go
01:07:36.340 back.
01:07:37.160 I just don't
01:07:37.680 go backwards.
01:07:39.040 And boy,
01:07:39.800 this is a
01:07:40.880 relationship
01:07:41.480 killer, let me 0.99
01:07:42.360 tell you.
01:07:43.220 I don't
01:07:43.880 recommend it to
01:07:44.600 you at all.
01:07:45.560 It's a total
01:07:46.160 relationship
01:07:46.720 killer.
01:07:47.500 Because try to 0.73
01:07:48.060 explain to
01:07:48.560 somebody you
01:07:49.020 shouldn't do
01:07:49.440 something that's
01:07:50.020 obviously right.
01:07:51.840 Well, you
01:07:52.200 obviously made the
01:07:53.120 wrong decision
01:07:53.740 based on this
01:07:54.520 new information.
01:07:55.800 Why in the
01:07:56.340 world wouldn't
01:07:56.820 you go back
01:07:57.320 and rethink
01:07:57.720 it?
01:07:58.980 Because I
01:08:00.760 don't go
01:08:01.080 backwards.
01:08:02.460 I just don't
01:08:03.220 go backwards.
01:08:04.440 I'll go fix
01:08:05.120 the new thing
01:08:05.780 that I made
01:08:06.660 worse, but I'm
01:08:07.860 not going to
01:08:08.180 go backwards.
01:08:10.420 Is that a
01:08:11.480 good way to
01:08:11.980 be?
01:08:12.200 I don't
01:08:12.400 know.
01:08:13.180 I really
01:08:13.540 don't know.
01:08:15.120 You took a
01:08:15.920 massive L
01:08:16.660 for what?
01:08:25.980 Sounds like
01:08:29.360 an excuse.
01:08:32.260 I wonder if we'll
01:08:33.260 ever find the
01:08:33.960 real story about
01:08:34.760 the hammer and
01:08:35.480 Pelosi.
01:08:35.840 I think we do
01:08:38.060 know the real
01:08:38.580 story about that.
01:08:40.340 Pelosi.
01:08:40.660 The part that
01:08:42.300 everybody's confused
01:08:43.240 about is not
01:08:44.080 confusing at all
01:08:45.040 because they say
01:08:46.680 that Pelosi
01:08:47.540 answered the
01:08:48.780 door and
01:08:50.860 the police
01:08:51.820 didn't see any
01:08:52.660 immediate problems
01:08:53.620 and that
01:08:55.320 Pelosi let
01:08:57.760 them in and
01:08:59.260 it was only
01:08:59.760 then that the
01:09:00.540 bad guy grabbed
01:09:01.220 the hammer and
01:09:02.400 hit Pelosi.
01:09:04.100 But isn't it
01:09:06.140 obvious exactly
01:09:07.380 what happened?
01:09:07.940 Pelosi was
01:09:10.280 engaging the
01:09:11.000 crazy guy in 0.84
01:09:11.680 conversation to 0.78
01:09:13.240 stall and to
01:09:15.160 keep it as
01:09:16.160 nonviolent as
01:09:17.220 possible.
01:09:18.000 He had the
01:09:18.500 hammer in his
01:09:19.140 hand just in
01:09:19.940 case, but he
01:09:21.220 was clearly
01:09:21.740 talking to the 0.99
01:09:22.500 crazy guy like a 0.92
01:09:23.420 friend and he 0.63
01:09:24.940 wanted to
01:09:25.360 maintain that
01:09:26.220 feel to keep
01:09:28.500 the violence
01:09:29.100 low.
01:09:29.680 So when the
01:09:30.300 police entered,
01:09:31.500 he said, you
01:09:32.060 know, my
01:09:32.340 friend here,
01:09:34.140 you know, here's
01:09:34.740 my friend because
01:09:35.440 they've been
01:09:35.760 talking for a
01:09:36.380 while now, so
01:09:37.840 he wanted to
01:09:38.880 present him as
01:09:39.460 a friend to
01:09:40.100 keep the
01:09:40.440 violence down.
01:09:41.580 Here's my
01:09:41.960 friend.
01:09:43.240 And then when
01:09:44.140 the crazy guy 0.65
01:09:45.520 realized that he
01:09:46.540 was going to be
01:09:47.020 in trouble and
01:09:48.360 that this was an
01:09:49.080 arrest, not just
01:09:49.840 a conversation, he
01:09:51.300 went nuts on
01:09:51.980 Pelosi for
01:09:52.620 calling the
01:09:53.320 police.
01:09:54.440 How is that
01:09:54.880 not obvious?
01:09:57.520 Now, I'm not
01:09:58.240 saying it's the
01:09:58.840 true story because
01:10:00.360 anything could
01:10:01.160 sound right and
01:10:02.000 not be true, but
01:10:03.600 it's the most
01:10:04.360 obvious explanation.
01:10:05.600 why would you
01:10:06.620 reject the
01:10:07.400 obvious explanation?
01:10:11.060 Yeah, that's
01:10:11.980 the obvious
01:10:12.340 explanation.
01:10:13.160 If there's more
01:10:13.920 to it, well,
01:10:15.520 that's the world
01:10:16.620 we live in.
01:10:17.300 We wouldn't be
01:10:17.780 that surprised.
01:10:22.580 Why do I have
01:10:23.360 so many clankers
01:10:24.220 here?
01:10:24.720 Is it because
01:10:25.140 you're all mad
01:10:25.740 that I blocked
01:10:27.300 Stix and Hammer?
01:10:29.860 So the
01:10:30.560 clankers are
01:10:31.680 fans of
01:10:33.320 Stix and Hammer
01:10:33.960 who I blocked
01:10:34.980 the other day
01:10:35.460 for being a 1.00
01:10:36.020 dick. 0.99
01:10:37.540 And I think
01:10:38.080 that can we
01:10:41.140 all agree that
01:10:41.720 it doesn't
01:10:42.120 matter?
01:10:43.460 Does anybody
01:10:43.940 care who I
01:10:44.600 block on 0.51
01:10:45.040 Twitter?
01:10:46.600 And for what
01:10:47.340 reason?
01:10:48.100 Because they're
01:10:48.460 personal reasons.
01:10:50.320 I'm not trying to
01:10:51.500 say that you
01:10:52.100 should block
01:10:52.560 him.
01:10:54.060 It was just a
01:10:54.620 personal decision.
01:10:56.260 It was a very
01:10:56.960 personal decision.
01:10:57.820 It has nothing to
01:10:58.380 do with politics,
01:10:59.500 nothing to do with
01:11:00.480 his opinion.
01:11:02.120 It was just
01:11:02.540 personal.
01:11:02.820 All right.
01:11:07.560 That, ladies 0.97
01:11:08.220 and gentlemen,
01:11:08.980 brings us to
01:11:09.580 the conclusion
01:11:10.160 of the best
01:11:10.820 live stream
01:11:11.440 you've ever
01:11:12.000 seen in your
01:11:12.480 life.
01:11:15.280 I got less
01:11:16.040 pushback than
01:11:16.660 I was expecting.
01:11:17.580 I thought I'd
01:11:17.980 get a lot more
01:11:18.400 pushback on
01:11:18.980 this one.
01:11:25.260 All right. 0.99
01:11:26.960 Narcissists.
01:11:28.720 Absolutely.
01:11:29.080 Oh, you just
01:11:31.760 reminded me.
01:11:34.620 So I responded,
01:11:35.880 Dr. Jordan
01:11:36.920 Peterson responded
01:11:37.760 to one of my
01:11:38.580 tweets, and he
01:11:40.360 was talking about
01:11:41.440 anonymity on
01:11:42.740 Twitter.
01:11:43.960 And he asked
01:11:45.260 some interesting
01:11:45.960 questions about
01:11:46.700 the anonymous
01:11:47.260 people, whether
01:11:48.820 they're good or
01:11:49.440 bad in general.
01:11:51.100 But Peterson
01:11:52.580 noted in his
01:11:53.880 response to me
01:11:54.620 that there's
01:11:56.880 research that
01:11:58.100 shows that these
01:11:58.960 anonymous social
01:12:00.260 media users are
01:12:02.320 high in the
01:12:02.980 dark triad
01:12:03.960 narcissist
01:12:05.040 personality traits.
01:12:07.140 So you've
01:12:07.880 really created
01:12:08.680 an attractor for
01:12:11.200 the worst people
01:12:11.960 in society, and
01:12:13.680 it attracted them
01:12:14.500 just like it
01:12:15.300 should have, and
01:12:16.340 then they're
01:12:16.620 acting exactly like
01:12:17.680 you'd expect the
01:12:18.460 worst people to
01:12:19.020 act.
01:12:20.200 Now, I
01:12:20.880 responded to him.
01:12:21.740 I don't know if he
01:12:22.540 responded to my
01:12:23.220 response.
01:12:23.700 I didn't see it,
01:12:24.560 anyone.
01:12:25.400 But I responded to
01:12:26.460 him because I
01:12:26.880 thought it was
01:12:27.240 funny that
01:12:28.800 Jordan Peterson
01:12:29.600 would be calling
01:12:30.340 anybody a
01:12:30.920 narcissist.
01:12:32.300 But I don't
01:12:33.240 put him in that
01:12:33.960 category without
01:12:34.700 myself.
01:12:36.220 So in my
01:12:36.700 response, I
01:12:37.800 noted that the
01:12:38.620 two of us were
01:12:39.320 both peacocks.
01:12:42.380 So it's hard to
01:12:43.440 say that the
01:12:44.080 anonymous people
01:12:45.040 are narcissists
01:12:46.220 when the people
01:12:47.280 in the conversation
01:12:48.120 are Dr. Jordan
01:12:49.120 Peterson and
01:12:49.820 me.
01:12:51.220 Do you think
01:12:51.900 Dr. Jordan
01:12:52.720 Peterson and
01:12:53.680 me, do you
01:12:55.320 think the two
01:12:55.800 of us have
01:12:57.160 the right to
01:12:58.200 call somebody
01:12:58.840 else a
01:12:59.300 narcissist?
01:13:00.700 Of all the
01:13:01.520 two people in
01:13:02.120 the world, there
01:13:03.640 couldn't be two 0.99
01:13:04.880 more narcissistic 0.85
01:13:05.800 people than us.
01:13:07.360 We're the two
01:13:08.280 peacockiest peacocks 0.86
01:13:11.160 you've ever seen.
01:13:12.660 I mean, we're
01:13:13.140 all about public
01:13:14.100 attention for
01:13:16.300 presumably doing
01:13:17.620 good work.
01:13:18.680 At least that's
01:13:19.380 the attempt.
01:13:20.480 Now, I'm
01:13:22.680 quick to point
01:13:23.320 out, and I'm
01:13:24.460 sure Dr.
01:13:25.560 Peterson would
01:13:26.140 point out the
01:13:26.660 same, that
01:13:27.500 they're basically
01:13:28.720 two major
01:13:30.100 kinds of
01:13:30.660 narcissists, and
01:13:32.340 they're very
01:13:32.760 different.
01:13:34.320 One kind likes
01:13:35.820 to show off, but
01:13:38.040 the best way to
01:13:38.660 show off is to
01:13:39.300 actually do
01:13:39.780 something good.
01:13:41.400 Like, that's
01:13:41.900 how I play it.
01:13:42.780 Like, I don't
01:13:43.140 really, it
01:13:44.320 wouldn't feed me
01:13:45.100 to get credit
01:13:45.800 for something I
01:13:46.440 didn't do, because
01:13:47.660 actually that
01:13:48.160 happens fairly
01:13:48.920 often.
01:13:49.820 Fairly often
01:13:50.560 people will
01:13:51.040 say, oh, you
01:13:51.640 made this
01:13:52.400 prediction correctly.
01:13:53.260 And I'll
01:13:54.140 look at it
01:13:54.500 and go, no, I
01:13:55.760 didn't.
01:13:56.900 I never made
01:13:57.800 that prediction,
01:13:58.500 but thank you
01:13:59.500 for giving me
01:14:00.100 credit.
01:14:00.920 But it doesn't
01:14:01.540 do anything for
01:14:02.140 me.
01:14:03.420 Getting credit
01:14:04.260 for something I
01:14:04.940 didn't do happens
01:14:06.480 to me all the
01:14:07.060 time.
01:14:07.660 It's like a very
01:14:08.420 irregular occurrence.
01:14:09.760 But when it's
01:14:10.240 something I didn't
01:14:10.900 do, it gives me
01:14:11.740 nothing.
01:14:12.840 Like, there's no
01:14:13.600 dopamine hit, just
01:14:15.080 nothing.
01:14:16.040 It's like, oh,
01:14:16.780 that's weird.
01:14:17.540 But if I get
01:14:19.280 credit for
01:14:19.760 something I
01:14:20.260 actually did, that
01:14:22.140 helped a real
01:14:22.840 person, it feels
01:14:24.420 really good.
01:14:25.980 Yeah, I'm the
01:14:27.260 most narcissistic, 0.98
01:14:29.200 grandiose narcissist 1.00
01:14:30.120 you could ever 0.95
01:14:30.740 be.
01:14:31.340 But I think, you
01:14:32.700 know, my non-medically
01:14:34.540 trained brain says
01:14:36.800 that Peterson is
01:14:38.800 exactly like me, in
01:14:40.360 this one regard.
01:14:41.520 You know, unlike
01:14:42.560 the poor man's
01:14:43.640 version.
01:14:44.540 But in this one
01:14:45.340 regard, he
01:14:46.160 clearly, according
01:14:48.440 to my personal
01:14:50.100 impression, I
01:14:51.820 can't read his
01:14:52.380 mind, but it
01:14:53.600 appears that he
01:14:54.640 likes attention
01:14:56.180 for doing things
01:14:57.280 that are useful
01:14:57.840 and good for
01:14:58.380 people.
01:14:59.420 And why
01:14:59.860 wouldn't he?
01:15:01.240 Wouldn't you?
01:15:02.680 He just, he can
01:15:03.600 deliver, so he's
01:15:04.940 in that position
01:15:05.520 because he has the
01:15:06.080 ability to do it.
01:15:07.340 But if you had
01:15:08.000 the ability to do
01:15:08.820 it, wouldn't
01:15:10.160 you?
01:15:11.740 Wouldn't you?
01:15:13.420 If you could do
01:15:14.480 as much good as
01:15:15.540 he does,
01:15:16.800 wouldn't you do
01:15:17.440 it?
01:15:18.240 And wouldn't you
01:15:18.740 do it as publicly
01:15:19.680 as possible?
01:15:20.480 And wouldn't you
01:15:21.580 enjoy it if
01:15:22.220 somebody said,
01:15:22.820 hey, you did
01:15:23.280 something good
01:15:23.780 for me?
01:15:24.160 Of course you
01:15:24.580 would.
01:15:25.620 And my
01:15:26.320 understanding is
01:15:27.020 that makes us
01:15:27.520 both narcissists.
01:15:29.680 But that's a
01:15:31.240 different kind than
01:15:32.140 the dark triad
01:15:33.420 narcissist.
01:15:34.400 So the other
01:15:35.040 kind is almost
01:15:37.140 all bad.
01:15:38.500 No, it's all
01:15:39.000 bad.
01:15:39.540 Not almost.
01:15:40.300 It's just all
01:15:40.740 bad.
01:15:41.040 So you've
01:15:43.580 got to keep
01:15:43.900 your narcissist
01:15:44.460 straight.
01:15:45.960 And so I think
01:15:46.440 my comment was a
01:15:47.240 little unfair
01:15:47.740 because I was
01:15:48.780 conflating the two
01:15:49.800 kinds of narcissists.
01:15:51.500 But it still
01:15:52.080 struck me as
01:15:52.680 funny.
01:15:56.180 Who is more
01:15:56.700 powerful,
01:15:57.460 Carrie Lake or
01:15:58.260 Mike Sertovich?
01:16:00.120 Is that a fair
01:16:00.920 question?
01:16:01.900 Who is more
01:16:02.400 powerful?
01:16:04.480 What you mean is
01:16:05.320 who's more
01:16:05.700 persuasive, right?
01:16:06.600 who has better
01:16:08.000 persuasion
01:16:08.560 abilities?
01:16:10.540 I think they're
01:16:11.320 both tens.
01:16:12.920 I don't know.
01:16:14.020 They're probably
01:16:14.700 both tens.
01:16:16.720 Ten out of
01:16:17.460 ten.
01:16:19.720 All right.
01:16:26.160 Were you
01:16:27.000 bullied as a
01:16:27.720 child?
01:16:29.040 Me?
01:16:30.620 Who wasn't
01:16:31.780 bullied as a
01:16:32.380 child?
01:16:33.820 Is there
01:16:34.400 anybody who
01:16:34.860 wasn't bullied
01:16:35.620 as a child?
01:16:36.600 Is that even
01:16:37.420 a thing?
01:16:39.500 You?
01:16:40.420 Oh, yeah.
01:16:41.040 Somebody who's
01:16:41.480 really big.
01:16:42.240 If you're very
01:16:43.240 large and you're
01:16:44.000 male, maybe you 0.71
01:16:45.620 weren't bullied.
01:16:46.400 That's true.
01:16:47.680 But even then,
01:16:48.440 the older kids
01:16:49.080 would bully you.
01:16:52.360 You were not?
01:16:54.780 I had a few
01:16:55.620 bullies, but
01:16:56.220 things didn't
01:16:56.820 work out for
01:16:57.400 them.
01:17:01.300 Yeah.
01:17:02.160 So my
01:17:02.620 bully narrative
01:17:03.940 is that I had
01:17:05.360 a few, but
01:17:05.960 I solved them
01:17:08.100 both with
01:17:08.500 violence.
01:17:10.860 Violence
01:17:11.260 solves a lot
01:17:11.880 of problems.
01:17:14.540 Violence
01:17:14.940 is very
01:17:15.800 successful.
01:17:16.880 Yeah.
01:17:17.240 In the old
01:17:17.960 days, remember
01:17:18.520 the old way 0.96
01:17:20.540 that you were
01:17:21.780 taught to deal
01:17:22.340 with bullies
01:17:22.860 is to attack
01:17:24.240 them. 0.97
01:17:25.420 So I just
01:17:26.100 physically 0.97
01:17:26.540 attacked them
01:17:27.180 and hurt 0.75
01:17:28.600 them.
01:17:29.340 And then they
01:17:29.920 never bothered
01:17:30.420 me again.
01:17:30.800 But the
01:17:32.580 key to
01:17:33.180 attacking
01:17:33.560 a bully
01:17:33.900 is you
01:17:34.220 got to
01:17:34.400 make sure
01:17:34.720 that the
01:17:35.060 next time
01:17:35.480 they know
01:17:35.760 you're going 0.98
01:17:36.040 to kill 1.00
01:17:36.300 them. 1.00
01:17:37.700 You can't
01:17:38.900 just hurt
01:17:39.340 them, because
01:17:40.340 then they
01:17:40.620 might just
01:17:40.960 want to hurt
01:17:41.340 you back.
01:17:42.660 So you
01:17:43.100 have to hurt 0.97
01:17:43.620 them and 0.96
01:17:44.640 tell them
01:17:45.000 that's just
01:17:45.780 the appetizer.
01:17:47.380 Well, there's
01:17:47.780 the appetizer.
01:17:48.820 If you want
01:17:49.240 the full meal,
01:17:49.960 I'll come
01:17:50.240 back.
01:17:51.400 So if you
01:17:51.980 don't do
01:17:52.280 that part,
01:17:52.860 it doesn't
01:17:53.200 work.
01:17:53.580 So you
01:17:53.760 got to really
01:17:54.400 sell that
01:17:54.880 part hard.
01:17:55.340 So once
01:17:56.580 you have
01:17:56.860 them down
01:17:57.300 and you're
01:17:57.620 shoving grass
01:17:58.260 in their
01:17:58.540 mouth, that's
01:18:00.540 when you tell
01:18:00.960 them you'll
01:18:01.360 come back.
01:18:03.480 As I was
01:18:04.080 making one of
01:18:04.580 my bullies
01:18:05.060 eat grass in
01:18:05.760 front of the
01:18:06.140 rest of the
01:18:06.480 class, as I
01:18:07.960 was sitting on
01:18:08.440 his chest
01:18:08.860 shoving it
01:18:09.340 down his 1.00
01:18:09.680 throat, I 0.70
01:18:11.000 reminded him
01:18:13.500 that I would
01:18:13.840 come back.
01:18:17.820 No, Elon
01:18:18.420 mentions.
01:18:19.040 I did mention
01:18:19.600 him.
01:18:20.180 I mentioned
01:18:20.780 him in the
01:18:21.240 reference to
01:18:21.940 Yoel.
01:18:25.340 All right.
01:18:26.800 Ladies and 0.98
01:18:27.460 gentlemen.
01:18:29.900 Yeah, Fauci
01:18:30.540 just bores
01:18:31.120 me.
01:18:32.420 There's
01:18:32.860 nothing to
01:18:33.260 say about
01:18:33.620 Fauci except
01:18:34.460 he said
01:18:35.600 X.
01:18:36.820 We think
01:18:37.400 he lied.
01:18:38.540 You know,
01:18:38.800 just over
01:18:39.480 and over
01:18:39.800 again.
01:18:41.600 That's the
01:18:42.220 whole story
01:18:42.700 of Fauci.
01:18:43.540 He said
01:18:44.160 something.
01:18:45.040 We think
01:18:45.640 he knew
01:18:46.040 it was a
01:18:46.500 lie.
01:18:47.720 It's just
01:18:48.280 that over
01:18:48.800 and over
01:18:49.120 again.
01:18:49.520 It's just
01:18:49.980 one story.
01:18:51.500 Just change
01:18:52.200 the variables
01:18:52.740 and it's
01:18:53.320 the same
01:18:53.800 story over
01:18:54.400 and over
01:18:54.740 again.
01:18:55.340 All right.
01:19:03.040 Everyone
01:19:03.440 clapped,
01:19:04.260 I bet,
01:19:04.640 when you
01:19:05.000 beat your
01:19:05.460 bullies.
01:19:06.180 No, I
01:19:06.560 don't think
01:19:06.820 they really
01:19:07.160 cared.
01:19:08.240 They were
01:19:08.780 doing their
01:19:09.200 own thing.
01:19:10.020 It just
01:19:10.340 happened to
01:19:10.640 be a busy
01:19:11.100 place.
01:19:12.380 It wasn't
01:19:12.900 that they
01:19:13.260 all crowded
01:19:13.940 around.
01:19:14.560 It just
01:19:14.860 wasn't in
01:19:15.440 front of
01:19:15.680 enough people
01:19:16.200 that there
01:19:16.660 were witnesses.
01:19:17.160 the real
01:19:26.280 story about
01:19:26.900 Fauci is
01:19:28.120 his terrifying
01:19:28.920 virility.
01:19:35.620 His
01:19:36.140 terrifying
01:19:36.840 virility.
01:19:41.760 That's pretty
01:19:42.460 good.
01:19:42.660 All right.
01:19:44.240 Ladies and 0.98
01:19:44.680 gentlemen,
01:19:45.100 that's all
01:19:45.420 for YouTube.
01:19:46.460 I'm going
01:19:46.680 to talk to
01:19:47.600 the local
01:19:48.360 subscribers
01:19:49.060 privately
01:19:49.580 here.
01:19:50.560 But thanks
01:19:51.000 for joining.
01:19:52.780 Fauci is
01:19:53.500 sexual.
01:19:54.140 Thank you.
01:19:54.200 Thank you.
01:19:54.260 Thank you.