Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1954 Scott Adams： More Twitter Revelations, So Juicy! Russian Arms Dealer Has Some Surprises

00:00:00.000 And I would not argue with that.

00:00:02.420 I wouldn't argue with it at all.

00:00:04.120 Because it might be the best thing that's ever happened to you.

00:00:06.840 And you won't believe this part, but it's going to get better.

00:00:11.480 Yeah, yeah, it gets better than this.

00:00:14.340 Right, right, I know.

00:00:16.260 It's hard to believe.

00:00:17.440 But all you need to make it better is a cupper mugger, a glass of tanker,

00:00:21.200 a chalice or a steiner, a canteen, a joker, a flasker, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:24.280 Fill it with your favorite liquid, I like, coffee.

00:00:27.260 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine here of the day,

00:00:31.620 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:33.220 It's called a simultaneous sip.

00:00:36.640 It happens now.

00:00:38.720 Go.

00:00:43.800 Ah.

00:00:45.420 Very good.

00:00:48.580 Well, I would like to start with an angry screed against guitars.

00:00:57.260 Some of you know I bought myself a nice guitar, and I said to myself,

00:01:00.960 how hard could that be?

00:01:02.720 How hard could it be to play a guitar?

00:01:05.420 And then you find out, okay, the first thing you need to know

00:01:08.420 is you need to deform your fingers so that they can form unnatural claw-like shapes

00:01:14.820 that you'll use in a non-obvious claw-like way.

00:01:21.200 Now, if you have a normal-sized hand, you need to be able to spread these.

00:01:29.780 So my guitar teacher said, try putting a tennis ball between these two fingers,

00:01:35.260 like spread them out, to which I sat there and I thought,

00:01:38.400 are you seriously telling me I have to deform my body to play an instrument?

00:01:43.740 Now, I've got a complaint, and it goes like this.

00:01:51.120 I'll try to say this without the F word,

00:01:53.280 but I don't think I'm going to be able to get all the way through it.

00:01:58.980 Serenity now.

00:02:00.960 And it goes like this.

00:02:03.760 If you invented a musical instrument,

00:02:06.580 or perhaps a sporting event,

00:02:10.280 and you invented that sporting event or musical instrument

00:02:14.920 a hundred fucking years ago,

00:02:19.040 maybe every now and then you should take a look at it,

00:02:22.460 see if you could upgrade the interface.

00:02:25.360 Say to yourself,

00:02:26.160 I wonder if anything's improved in the last hundred years.

00:02:33.000 For example, when basketball was invented,

00:02:36.580 and they said, let's put this hoop at ten feet,

00:02:40.120 do you think they were saying to themselves,

00:02:42.520 oh, this will be fun when seven-foot tall people overtake the sport,

00:02:48.440 and the only thing you're really finding out is how tall people are,

00:02:51.640 give or take, you know, a curry.

00:02:55.960 Do you think you would have invented basketball the same way?

00:02:58.900 Hey, let's invent things where a seven-footer

00:03:04.360 will just stand near the hoop and ruin the game for the rest of us?

00:03:09.180 Hey, I'm here to ruin the game for the rest of you

00:03:11.060 because it wasn't invented for seven-foot tall people.

00:03:13.740 Didn't see this coming, did you?

00:03:15.340 Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

00:03:16.940 Or how about tennis?

00:03:18.900 Are any of you dumb enough to play tennis?

00:03:21.500 I was dumb enough to play tennis for, I don't know,

00:03:24.120 50 years until I quit.

00:03:26.040 Do you know what ruined tennis?

00:03:29.820 The equipment.

00:03:31.860 The game stayed the same,

00:03:33.900 and somebody kept inventing stronger players

00:03:36.460 and more powerful rackets

00:03:38.600 until the entire game is some guy with an arm the size of a tree trunk

00:03:44.520 serving bullets at the other person,

00:03:46.960 and the other person's like,

00:03:48.000 and that's basically the sport of tennis.

00:03:52.920 Every hundred fucking years,

00:03:55.040 you should take a look at your sport

00:03:56.380 and see if anything has changed

00:03:58.440 to maybe update it a little bit.

00:04:01.140 All right?

00:04:01.680 Now, I'm no Elon Musk,

00:04:05.620 but if I were,

00:04:08.480 I would buy all of the guitar-making manufacturers in the world,

00:04:13.180 and I'd say,

00:04:14.260 you know what you shouldn't make anymore

00:04:16.120 is an instrument that requires you to put fingers

00:04:19.320 in a distorted monster way

00:04:22.340 around a thing that's way too thick for your hand,

00:04:26.420 and like this,

00:04:28.480 like that.

00:04:29.540 Don't do that.

00:04:32.300 Instead, let me just suggest

00:04:34.720 that each of these cords could possibly be maybe one button.

00:04:40.460 Yes, I know there are more cords

00:04:42.620 than you could fit with buttons, perhaps,

00:04:44.560 but you only need three to do most.

00:04:48.080 You know, you could do a lot with three cords.

00:04:50.480 You give me 50 cords,

00:04:52.440 one button apiece,

00:04:54.480 I think I could learn to play the guitar,

00:04:57.220 but I wouldn't learn to play the guitar

00:04:59.280 like this,

00:05:00.760 like this,

00:05:02.140 deforming my body.

00:05:03.640 Oh, hey, everybody.

00:05:05.120 Good news.

00:05:06.240 I've been playing the guitar so long

00:05:07.900 that my hand is now deformed

00:05:09.280 permanently,

00:05:10.440 and now I'm a great guitar player.

00:05:14.120 Look at this.

00:05:15.540 Look at my sport.

00:05:20.400 All right.

00:05:20.980 I just had to get that out of my system.

00:05:23.880 Now can we talk about the news?

00:05:26.700 That was just

00:05:27.540 a point of personal privilege there.

00:05:30.340 Sorry.

00:05:34.040 Joshua Steidman

00:05:35.080 has a very interesting thread.

00:05:37.080 You've heard about these

00:05:38.740 seemingly independent attacks

00:05:41.520 on our grid.

00:05:43.760 So in a few cases,

00:05:45.180 people have snipers

00:05:46.860 have fired bullets

00:05:47.720 into power grids

00:05:49.320 in local places.

00:05:51.160 But there seems to be

00:05:52.660 some kind of a,

00:05:53.920 maybe a pattern.

00:05:55.600 There seems to be an uptick

00:05:56.760 in what look to be

00:05:58.880 rogue attacks

00:05:59.960 on the infrastructure.

00:06:01.940 Now, we don't have any evidence

00:06:03.620 that these are coordinated.

00:06:04.900 But as Joshua

00:06:06.920 so wisely points out,

00:06:10.440 if a foreign country

00:06:13.240 wanted to mess with us,

00:06:14.880 and as he uses the phrase,

00:06:17.020 put sand in our gears,

00:06:19.320 one of the ways

00:06:20.440 you could do it,

00:06:21.460 which is a known,

00:06:22.960 understood way

00:06:23.640 to do things,

00:06:24.840 is the intelligence agency

00:06:26.580 from another

00:06:27.340 unfriendly country

00:06:28.960 could look for

00:06:30.920 rogue criminal elements

00:06:33.100 who would be willing

00:06:33.860 to do an attack

00:06:34.720 for money.

00:06:36.260 And then it wouldn't be obvious

00:06:37.580 where the attacks

00:06:38.240 were coming from.

00:06:39.000 It would look like

00:06:39.580 a bunch of individual

00:06:41.140 rogue terrorists.

00:06:43.960 And Joshua points out

00:06:46.620 that there's

00:06:47.460 at least three possibilities here.

00:06:50.720 But they all have

00:06:51.640 to be considered.

00:06:52.740 One is that they are

00:06:53.660 individual attacks,

00:06:54.920 and there's something

00:06:55.560 that's causing more of them,

00:06:56.860 but maybe not anybody

00:06:58.400 coordinating it.

00:06:59.320 Number two,

00:07:04.240 possibility is

00:07:05.300 it's an actual

00:07:05.980 coordinated attack

00:07:07.280 in which

00:07:08.540 the foreign government

00:07:10.400 is trying to hurt

00:07:11.360 the United States,

00:07:12.780 and it's just about

00:07:13.780 hurting us.

00:07:14.860 That's possible.

00:07:16.380 The other possibility

00:07:17.400 is the funny one,

00:07:19.040 that there's a foreign country

00:07:20.580 that's trying to send us

00:07:21.680 a message

00:07:22.200 that they could destroy

00:07:23.860 our grid

00:07:24.380 any time they want to,

00:07:26.240 but we're not getting

00:07:27.120 the message

00:07:27.680 because it's too indirect.

00:07:29.520 It's too subtle.

00:07:31.080 Like, okay,

00:07:32.160 are they trying to send

00:07:33.040 us a message?

00:07:34.240 Because they look like

00:07:35.200 individual attacks,

00:07:36.660 but they do have

00:07:37.440 something in common,

00:07:39.100 but we don't know

00:07:39.820 who would be sending

00:07:40.480 the message.

00:07:41.960 So it might actually be

00:07:43.500 one possibility

00:07:45.000 is that it's

00:07:45.600 a failed attempt

00:07:46.780 to send a message

00:07:48.140 that somebody could

00:07:49.060 take us out

00:07:49.560 if they want to,

00:07:50.760 and we're not getting it.

00:07:53.220 Now,

00:07:53.920 I don't know

00:07:54.740 which one to bet on,

00:07:55.600 but I like

00:07:57.540 the way of thinking

00:07:59.460 that says

00:08:00.120 don't eliminate

00:08:01.020 all the possibilities.

00:08:04.100 Like,

00:08:04.400 need to look into it

00:08:05.360 a little bit.

00:08:07.220 All right.

00:08:12.440 So,

00:08:13.440 have you ever heard me say,

00:08:15.480 for those of you

00:08:16.540 who are new

00:08:16.860 to my live stream,

00:08:18.660 can the people

00:08:19.260 who have been watching

00:08:19.780 me for a while,

00:08:20.960 how many times

00:08:21.860 have I said

00:08:22.580 that in the long run

00:08:24.220 the United States

00:08:25.000 and Russia

00:08:25.440 are natural allies?

00:08:27.640 The actual phrase,

00:08:28.460 the word natural allies.

00:08:31.180 Can you confirm

00:08:31.940 that I've said that

00:08:32.660 way too many times?

00:08:33.960 I've said that

00:08:34.480 so many times.

00:08:36.280 Well,

00:08:36.800 today in the news,

00:08:38.720 freed Russian arms dealer

00:08:41.920 Victor Bout,

00:08:43.480 he's the one

00:08:44.120 who was traded

00:08:44.860 for Greiner,

00:08:47.220 the WNBA player.

00:08:48.940 So he's free now.

00:08:49.940 He had been

00:08:50.280 in an American jail

00:08:51.280 for his arms dealing,

00:08:53.940 which were pretty bad

00:08:55.300 because he armed

00:08:56.200 a lot of African

00:08:57.020 and other countries

00:08:58.580 that killed

00:08:59.240 a lot of people.

00:09:00.560 But it turns out

00:09:01.700 that Victor,

00:09:02.900 the dangerous

00:09:03.820 Russian arms dealer,

00:09:05.320 is very pro-American.

00:09:07.540 He's very pro-American.

00:09:10.300 He speaks

00:09:11.060 really good English

00:09:12.000 with an accent,

00:09:13.420 but he's really good English.

00:09:15.060 And in jail,

00:09:16.420 he said he would

00:09:17.100 hang around

00:09:18.200 with a number

00:09:19.760 of rural people.

00:09:21.800 I don't know

00:09:22.160 why he mentioned rural,

00:09:23.840 probably because

00:09:24.900 they were white,

00:09:25.580 now that I think about it.

00:09:26.800 But he said

00:09:27.200 he hung around

00:09:27.780 with a lot of rural people,

00:09:29.540 you know, Americans,

00:09:30.560 and he said

00:09:31.000 they were great

00:09:31.560 because they were

00:09:33.100 all interested in Russia.

00:09:34.400 Nobody had any

00:09:35.220 bad feelings about Russia.

00:09:37.120 He had no bad feelings

00:09:38.360 about Americans.

00:09:39.420 Loves Americans.

00:09:41.060 And he said,

00:09:42.360 he actually used

00:09:43.020 the same phrase.

00:09:44.420 He said that Russia

00:09:45.180 and the United States

00:09:45.860 are natural allies.

00:09:47.080 Did you see that coming?

00:09:50.380 Like, who had that

00:09:51.500 on their bingo card?

00:09:53.340 Freed Russian arms dealer

00:09:54.880 says U.S. and America

00:09:55.960 are natural allies,

00:09:57.340 and we should maybe

00:09:58.040 yak that way.

00:10:03.180 Scott doesn't say

00:10:04.200 we are natural allies.

00:10:05.980 First time hearing it

00:10:07.060 since 2017.

00:10:09.200 So there's somebody

00:10:10.040 out here who says

00:10:10.780 I've never said that.

00:10:13.520 But there are plenty

00:10:14.480 of people who've heard

00:10:15.220 me say it

00:10:15.780 probably 12 times.

00:10:18.480 Yeah, I've said it a lot.

00:10:21.960 So, I don't know

00:10:23.080 if that means anything,

00:10:24.040 but it's interesting

00:10:24.700 to have a famous

00:10:26.740 Russian arms dealer

00:10:28.040 agree with me.

00:10:29.700 Because if you don't

00:10:30.620 have a famous

00:10:31.460 Russian arms dealer

00:10:32.620 agreeing with your

00:10:33.600 live stream,

00:10:35.340 well, you need to

00:10:36.040 work harder.

00:10:37.120 Try to get them

00:10:37.640 on your side.

00:10:39.720 Today is full of

00:10:40.740 actually really

00:10:41.400 interesting news.

00:10:42.820 Like the kind

00:10:43.740 where you just say,

00:10:44.720 really?

00:10:45.880 Really?

00:10:47.780 Is that true?

00:10:49.260 All right, here's

00:10:49.620 another one.

00:10:50.860 How many of you

00:10:51.580 know Daniel Ellsberg

00:10:52.860 from the,

00:10:53.740 it was the

00:10:54.140 Pentagon Papers,

00:10:55.200 right?

00:10:55.960 So he had some,

00:10:56.860 he had some secret

00:10:58.500 U.S. government

00:11:00.660 documents.

00:11:02.620 And so that was,

00:11:04.080 you know,

00:11:04.260 a famous story

00:11:04.900 of Daniel Ellsberg.

00:11:06.120 So Daniel Ellsberg

00:11:06.920 now is quite elderly.

00:11:09.380 I don't know

00:11:10.080 how old he is,

00:11:10.860 but it looks like

00:11:12.220 he's around 80-ish,

00:11:13.940 right?

00:11:14.700 And here's something

00:11:15.700 we just learned.

00:11:17.220 Apparently Assange

00:11:18.420 gave Daniel Ellsberg

00:11:20.300 a full copy

00:11:21.740 of all the

00:11:22.280 Chelsea Manning

00:11:23.520 stuff that

00:11:25.080 WikiLeaks had

00:11:26.140 just in case.

00:11:29.080 So Daniel Ellsberg

00:11:30.140 had the full copy

00:11:31.240 the whole time

00:11:32.280 of everything

00:11:33.520 that Assange

00:11:34.520 had produced.

00:11:35.880 and the reason

00:11:37.000 that he'd given

00:11:37.580 it to Ellsberg,

00:11:41.220 the reason he'd

00:11:42.480 given it to Ellsberg

00:11:43.220 is as a

00:11:44.040 emergency backup

00:11:45.120 because he was

00:11:46.440 the one person

00:11:47.180 that he trusted

00:11:47.900 to get it out

00:11:48.580 to the public.

00:11:50.600 That's kind of

00:11:51.380 amazing,

00:11:51.840 isn't it?

00:11:52.440 And we're just

00:11:53.100 finding it out.

00:11:54.520 And then here's

00:11:55.380 the, you know,

00:11:56.600 the added boost

00:11:58.420 on top of it.

00:12:00.040 Ellsberg is saying

00:12:01.000 that if Assange

00:12:02.720 is guilty

00:12:04.140 of simply

00:12:05.860 possessing

00:12:06.580 the documents

00:12:07.260 because I think,

00:12:08.280 I don't know

00:12:08.820 the specific

00:12:09.600 legal argument

00:12:10.900 here,

00:12:11.520 but I think

00:12:12.000 the argument

00:12:12.860 is that simply

00:12:14.120 possessing

00:12:15.740 these secret

00:12:16.560 documents

00:12:17.060 is a crime.

00:12:19.000 And Ellsberg

00:12:19.720 is saying

00:12:20.160 if that's a crime

00:12:20.960 you better indict

00:12:21.700 me

00:12:22.060 because I have

00:12:23.320 them.

00:12:25.300 Right?

00:12:27.380 He illegally

00:12:28.860 has these

00:12:30.620 documents

00:12:31.120 but he would

00:12:32.040 say that he

00:12:32.640 legally has them

00:12:33.540 because they

00:12:34.360 were given

00:12:34.680 to him

00:12:35.180 by somebody

00:12:36.140 he did not

00:12:36.640 steal them.

00:12:38.020 So that's

00:12:38.660 legal if you're

00:12:39.500 not the stealer

00:12:40.240 I guess.

00:12:41.360 Now he makes

00:12:41.940 the point

00:12:42.320 that if this

00:12:42.900 were Great

00:12:43.360 Britain

00:12:43.700 it would

00:12:44.740 definitely

00:12:45.180 be illegal

00:12:45.760 because they

00:12:46.140 have a

00:12:46.380 specific law

00:12:47.340 that says

00:12:48.460 you can't

00:12:49.040 have any

00:12:49.540 secret

00:12:50.120 government

00:12:50.520 documents.

00:12:51.420 That's my

00:12:51.740 understanding.

00:12:52.940 But Ellsberg

00:12:53.760 points out

00:12:54.500 that in the

00:12:54.900 United States

00:12:55.400 we don't

00:12:55.720 have that

00:12:56.060 law.

00:12:57.480 And simply

00:12:58.000 possessing

00:12:58.780 the documents

00:12:59.360 is not a

00:12:59.940 crime.

00:13:00.620 And he'd

00:13:01.340 be willing

00:13:01.680 to test

00:13:02.160 it.

00:13:02.860 Like he's

00:13:03.300 actually

00:13:03.600 begging for

00:13:04.960 the let's

00:13:06.340 bring it

00:13:06.660 on.

00:13:07.440 Let's test

00:13:07.960 this in

00:13:08.320 court.

00:13:09.780 How much

00:13:10.500 do you

00:13:10.720 love that?

00:13:12.500 This is the

00:13:14.440 America that I

00:13:15.240 want to live

00:13:15.700 in.

00:13:16.220 Right?

00:13:16.700 This little

00:13:17.220 scenario where

00:13:19.280 somebody had

00:13:19.860 some information

00:13:20.540 they thought

00:13:20.960 would be good

00:13:21.380 for the

00:13:21.680 citizens.

00:13:22.480 They found

00:13:23.160 the most

00:13:23.640 trustworthy

00:13:24.200 citizen they

00:13:25.100 could find

00:13:25.560 on this

00:13:26.440 topic.

00:13:27.200 According to

00:13:27.960 Assange

00:13:28.520 apparently.

00:13:29.520 Gave him

00:13:30.040 the documents

00:13:30.620 had a good

00:13:31.100 backup plan

00:13:31.900 and then the

00:13:32.960 backup plan

00:13:33.840 is working

00:13:35.260 not exactly

00:13:35.960 the way

00:13:36.360 Assange

00:13:36.800 planned but

00:13:38.140 in a different

00:13:38.680 way.

00:13:39.840 It's working.

00:13:41.240 In other words

00:13:41.780 Ellsberg now

00:13:42.520 just entered

00:13:43.800 the fight.

00:13:45.080 If he had

00:13:45.580 not had

00:13:46.400 those documents

00:13:47.200 Ellsberg is

00:13:48.020 91.

00:13:48.680 Thank you.

00:13:49.520 Ellsberg is

00:13:50.040 91.

00:13:50.840 If Ellsberg

00:13:51.580 were not

00:13:52.380 91 and

00:13:53.700 still willing

00:13:54.320 to fight

00:13:54.860 this would

00:13:55.960 look different.

00:13:57.660 This would

00:13:58.260 look different.

00:14:01.740 All right.

00:14:04.160 So here's

00:14:05.240 what I

00:14:06.360 tentatively

00:14:07.000 favor but

00:14:07.840 I'm going

00:14:08.120 to tell you

00:14:08.460 that I'm

00:14:08.820 not fully

00:14:10.540 informed on

00:14:11.320 the whole

00:14:11.700 Assange

00:14:12.240 WikiLeak

00:14:12.780 thing.

00:14:13.200 I feel

00:14:13.640 like I

00:14:14.440 might have

00:14:14.860 some dark

00:14:16.980 corners there

00:14:18.100 that need

00:14:18.640 a little

00:14:18.860 light in my

00:14:19.460 understanding.

00:14:20.560 But here's

00:14:21.060 where I'm

00:14:21.360 at.

00:14:22.420 I'd like

00:14:23.040 to see a

00:14:23.440 public trial.

00:14:24.860 I don't

00:14:26.560 even know

00:14:26.860 if that's

00:14:27.100 an option.

00:14:28.160 But would

00:14:28.740 we be able

00:14:29.280 to see

00:14:29.580 the trial

00:14:29.980 or would

00:14:30.340 it be a

00:14:30.620 bunch of

00:14:30.940 secret stuff

00:14:31.600 so it

00:14:31.880 would have

00:14:32.000 to be

00:14:32.240 behind

00:14:32.540 closed

00:14:32.960 doors?

00:14:33.760 If it's

00:14:34.280 behind

00:14:34.520 closed

00:14:34.920 doors I

00:14:35.400 don't

00:14:35.560 favor it

00:14:36.020 at all.

00:14:37.380 If it's

00:14:38.800 going to

00:14:39.020 be open

00:14:39.400 to the

00:14:39.700 public as

00:14:40.400 much as

00:14:40.820 possible

00:14:41.480 then I

00:14:42.620 say let's

00:14:43.000 test it.

00:14:45.120 I don't

00:14:46.120 even know

00:14:46.560 why Assange

00:14:47.340 is so

00:14:47.960 concerned

00:14:48.520 about

00:14:49.240 extradition

00:14:51.400 because it's

00:14:52.500 not like

00:14:52.880 he's a

00:14:53.200 free person.

00:14:53.780 I feel

00:14:55.040 like it's

00:14:55.440 his only

00:14:55.800 path to

00:14:56.280 freedom.

00:14:57.560 And if

00:14:57.980 his only

00:14:58.400 path to

00:14:58.840 freedom would

00:14:59.440 also give

00:15:00.040 us American

00:15:01.560 citizens the

00:15:02.340 things we

00:15:02.760 want to

00:15:03.080 know I

00:15:06.320 feel like

00:15:06.780 that's a

00:15:07.100 win-win.

00:15:08.100 Does

00:15:08.360 anybody see a

00:15:08.940 problem with

00:15:09.360 that?

00:15:10.140 What would

00:15:10.520 be the

00:15:10.780 problem with

00:15:11.160 just putting

00:15:11.820 it in court

00:15:12.360 and letting

00:15:12.780 us see how

00:15:13.780 it plays

00:15:14.080 out?

00:15:16.980 He might

00:15:17.620 be

00:15:17.780 abstained.

00:15:18.220 but doesn't

00:15:20.200 he have

00:15:20.460 that risk

00:15:20.900 already?

00:15:21.740 I mean

00:15:21.960 would he

00:15:22.600 be in

00:15:22.940 more danger

00:15:24.600 here than

00:15:25.160 wherever he

00:15:25.700 is?

00:15:26.300 I mean

00:15:26.560 anybody can

00:15:27.400 get to

00:15:27.700 him anywhere.

00:15:30.940 You've been

00:15:31.540 yelling power

00:15:32.220 chords at me.

00:15:33.320 I've been

00:15:33.620 playing the

00:15:34.040 power chords

00:15:34.660 but even

00:15:35.120 the power

00:15:35.520 chords you

00:15:36.180 need these

00:15:36.760 two fingers

00:15:37.480 to be

00:15:38.260 further apart

00:15:38.900 than a

00:15:39.240 normal hand.

00:15:41.000 So I

00:15:42.000 hear what you

00:15:42.440 say.

00:15:42.780 I was

00:15:43.060 practicing

00:15:43.480 my

00:15:43.780 power

00:15:44.020 chords

00:15:44.280 yesterday.

00:15:48.640 Anyway.

00:15:50.320 So let's

00:15:51.380 keep an eye

00:15:51.800 on that.

00:15:53.540 Here's a

00:15:54.140 funny, not

00:15:54.880 a funny

00:15:55.280 story, a

00:15:56.000 horrible

00:15:56.260 story.

00:15:56.840 I'm sorry.

00:15:58.120 Did I say

00:15:58.520 it was

00:15:58.740 funny?

00:15:59.720 This is a

00:16:00.260 tragic,

00:16:00.800 horrible

00:16:01.000 story about

00:16:02.820 a nurse in

00:16:03.840 Germany who

00:16:05.280 gave 8,600

00:16:07.320 patients a

00:16:08.360 saline shot

00:16:09.280 when they

00:16:10.280 thought they

00:16:10.660 were getting

00:16:10.960 a COVID

00:16:11.440 vaccination.

00:16:12.900 So apparently

00:16:13.400 this nurse

00:16:14.060 was anti

00:16:15.680 vax, anti

00:16:17.020 COVID vax

00:16:17.780 and was

00:16:19.240 giving people

00:16:20.040 saline instead

00:16:21.380 of the

00:16:21.780 vaccination.

00:16:23.220 And so

00:16:23.780 she got

00:16:24.460 convicted and

00:16:26.120 she'll serve

00:16:26.800 some time I

00:16:27.540 guess.

00:16:28.680 And here's

00:16:29.300 the, or

00:16:29.960 no, she

00:16:30.820 won't serve

00:16:31.180 time.

00:16:31.500 I think it

00:16:31.800 was a

00:16:32.400 suspended

00:16:34.380 sentence or

00:16:35.580 something.

00:16:35.960 I don't

00:16:36.120 know.

00:16:36.520 But she's

00:16:36.960 got some

00:16:37.260 kind of

00:16:37.540 penalty.

00:16:39.420 But is

00:16:40.320 there anything

00:16:40.700 missing in

00:16:41.940 the story?

00:16:42.380 Now, apparently

00:16:43.760 she admitted

00:16:44.700 that she

00:16:45.380 gave some

00:16:46.020 saline

00:16:46.560 injections, but

00:16:48.400 then they

00:16:48.780 thought, wait,

00:16:49.480 it's probably

00:16:49.940 more than

00:16:50.320 some.

00:16:50.840 And then

00:16:51.100 they started

00:16:51.460 testing all

00:16:52.060 the people

00:16:52.440 who had

00:16:52.880 been to

00:16:53.940 her and

00:16:54.280 they found

00:16:54.620 out that

00:16:54.960 they didn't

00:16:55.280 have antibodies

00:16:55.980 for the

00:16:56.520 vaccination.

00:16:57.200 vaccination.

00:16:58.160 So they

00:16:58.720 determined

00:16:59.100 there's

00:16:59.360 8,600

00:16:59.840 people who

00:17:01.100 should have

00:17:01.460 been vaccinated

00:17:02.160 and weren't.

00:17:03.140 And mostly

00:17:03.560 they were

00:17:03.880 over 70.

00:17:05.400 So it was

00:17:05.760 actually the

00:17:06.260 most vulnerable

00:17:06.900 population.

00:17:09.020 Now, is

00:17:09.680 there anything

00:17:09.960 missing in the

00:17:10.580 story?

00:17:11.840 Any dogs not

00:17:12.940 barking?

00:17:14.460 Thank you.

00:17:15.700 That's right.

00:17:17.580 Did

00:17:17.940 anybody

00:17:20.420 ask the

00:17:22.180 8,600

00:17:22.740 people, how

00:17:25.400 did it work

00:17:25.760 out?

00:17:28.680 How did it

00:17:29.320 work out?

00:17:31.120 Because you

00:17:32.320 know what is

00:17:32.740 conspicuously

00:17:33.580 missing in a

00:17:34.380 story about

00:17:34.900 somebody who's

00:17:35.540 in legal

00:17:36.080 jeopardy?

00:17:37.300 What's

00:17:37.820 conspicuously

00:17:38.680 missing?

00:17:40.380 What was the

00:17:41.360 cost or the

00:17:42.940 outcome of the

00:17:43.840 bad behavior?

00:17:45.360 We know

00:17:46.080 8,600

00:17:46.600 people got a

00:17:47.820 shot and then

00:17:49.120 we can say for

00:17:49.880 sure about the

00:17:50.580 8,600

00:17:51.060 people.

00:17:51.620 What can we

00:17:51.980 say for

00:17:52.340 sure?

00:17:53.480 They did

00:17:54.240 not have

00:17:54.900 vaccination

00:17:55.660 complications.

00:17:57.820 We can say

00:17:58.520 that for sure.

00:17:59.940 We know

00:18:00.340 that the

00:18:00.680 nurse reduced

00:18:01.640 the risk of

00:18:02.580 complications.

00:18:04.180 Now, don't

00:18:05.600 you think they

00:18:06.160 had an

00:18:06.480 obligation to

00:18:07.120 ask if

00:18:07.700 anybody was

00:18:08.560 worse off?

00:18:09.940 Did they

00:18:10.280 have worse

00:18:10.800 outcomes?

00:18:11.920 Did they

00:18:12.380 get COVID

00:18:12.900 and die?

00:18:15.420 I have a

00:18:16.380 suspicion that

00:18:18.700 the data does

00:18:20.180 not support

00:18:20.860 the prosecution.

00:18:21.760 because if

00:18:24.000 it did, and

00:18:25.340 they actually

00:18:25.760 talked to

00:18:26.260 all 8,600

00:18:26.940 people, because

00:18:28.300 I think they

00:18:28.740 had to talk

00:18:29.220 to the 8,600

00:18:30.100 people to

00:18:31.800 test them for

00:18:32.520 antibodies.

00:18:33.700 They had

00:18:34.440 extended

00:18:34.860 conversations,

00:18:35.840 right?

00:18:36.040 So, isn't

00:18:40.620 that kind of

00:18:41.100 conspicuously

00:18:41.820 missing?

00:18:43.980 I'm just

00:18:44.740 saying.

00:18:45.460 It's just

00:18:45.840 not there.

00:18:47.880 All right.

00:18:48.640 Another amazing

00:18:49.620 story.

00:18:50.080 The news is

00:18:51.600 just full of

00:18:52.220 amazing stories

00:18:53.020 today.

00:18:53.820 There's a

00:18:54.260 whistleblower,

00:18:54.980 Dr.

00:18:55.380 Huff, who

00:18:56.520 worked in

00:18:57.020 the Wuhan

00:18:57.460 lab from

00:18:58.240 2014 to

00:18:59.200 2016,

00:19:00.020 including

00:19:00.320 being vice

00:19:01.700 president at

00:19:02.220 one point.

00:19:02.640 So he's a

00:19:03.040 high-ranking

00:19:04.320 Wuhan lab

00:19:05.800 American who

00:19:07.540 says,

00:19:08.380 absolutely,

00:19:10.660 the U.S.

00:19:11.300 government is

00:19:11.900 to blame for

00:19:12.600 the transfer of

00:19:13.520 dangerous biotech to

00:19:14.960 the Chinese.

00:19:16.460 In other words,

00:19:17.300 America is

00:19:18.700 blaming China,

00:19:20.360 China is

00:19:20.940 blaming the

00:19:21.900 U.S., and

00:19:23.580 they were both

00:19:24.320 fucking in on

00:19:25.200 it.

00:19:26.600 That's what the

00:19:27.440 whistleblower says.

00:19:28.700 They were in on

00:19:29.580 it together.

00:19:32.420 Ouch.

00:19:34.700 Now, have I

00:19:37.540 told you that

00:19:38.240 every time there's

00:19:39.320 a conspiracy

00:19:39.900 theory, lately

00:19:41.980 it seems we're

00:19:42.680 finding out it's

00:19:43.660 exactly what you

00:19:44.540 thought it was?

00:19:45.140 What's the

00:19:47.400 worst thing you

00:19:48.200 could have

00:19:48.480 assumed about

00:19:49.200 the Wuhan lab?

00:19:50.820 Is the worst

00:19:51.500 thing you could

00:19:52.060 assume that it

00:19:54.600 was all China?

00:19:55.560 It was just

00:19:56.180 China.

00:19:57.220 China did it,

00:19:58.020 and they're

00:19:58.180 lying about it.

00:19:58.640 Is that the

00:19:59.000 worst thing you

00:19:59.420 could assume?

00:20:00.060 Because that's

00:20:00.480 really bad.

00:20:01.660 That would be

00:20:02.120 bad.

00:20:03.280 Is the worst

00:20:04.060 you could assume

00:20:04.600 it was really

00:20:05.060 America, and

00:20:06.560 we were blaming

00:20:07.280 China, and

00:20:09.040 mostly getting

00:20:09.760 away with it?

00:20:10.340 That'd be bad.

00:20:11.820 I mean, that'd

00:20:12.320 be very, very

00:20:13.000 bad.

00:20:13.340 But you

00:20:14.440 know what

00:20:14.680 would be

00:20:14.960 worse than

00:20:15.460 that?

00:20:16.340 If the

00:20:16.900 United States

00:20:17.500 and China

00:20:18.000 were completely

00:20:18.860 aware that it

00:20:20.200 was both of

00:20:20.800 us, and we

00:20:22.540 just agreed to

00:20:23.240 blame each

00:20:23.720 other so that

00:20:24.240 nobody was

00:20:24.680 quite sure.

00:20:26.480 I feel like it

00:20:27.440 was the worst

00:20:27.960 case scenario.

00:20:29.580 I don't know

00:20:30.280 if it could be

00:20:30.760 any worse.

00:20:32.000 What could be

00:20:32.480 worse?

00:20:33.600 Now, let's

00:20:35.360 back up a little

00:20:35.960 bit.

00:20:36.220 Do you believe

00:20:36.700 the whistleblower?

00:20:38.300 What is the

00:20:39.160 credibility of the

00:20:40.080 whistleblower?

00:20:40.820 It looks like

00:20:41.380 his credentials are

00:20:42.460 solid.

00:20:43.340 It looks like

00:20:44.440 he was in the

00:20:44.900 right place at

00:20:45.460 the right time,

00:20:46.860 roughly, 2016.

00:20:48.320 I don't know if

00:20:48.700 that's the right

00:20:49.120 time.

00:20:52.200 It looks

00:20:52.920 credible to

00:20:53.700 me, but there

00:20:55.440 is one knock

00:20:57.480 against it.

00:20:58.920 It's a pretty

00:20:59.420 big knock.

00:21:00.660 So there's one

00:21:01.340 mark against his

00:21:02.320 credibility.

00:21:03.000 What is it?

00:21:04.220 What's the mark

00:21:05.020 against his

00:21:05.760 credibility?

00:21:06.060 Yeah, follow the

00:21:06.760 money, exactly.

00:21:07.820 He's writing a

00:21:08.480 book.

00:21:08.720 And so here's

00:21:12.220 somebody who's

00:21:12.880 allegedly an

00:21:13.920 American citizen.

00:21:15.540 I say allegedly

00:21:16.580 because he didn't

00:21:17.180 act like one.

00:21:18.640 He didn't act

00:21:19.180 like one.

00:21:19.980 If he waited

00:21:20.800 until now to

00:21:21.760 publish his

00:21:22.300 fucking book for

00:21:24.300 us to know what

00:21:25.020 was going on with

00:21:25.740 the pandemic, I

00:21:27.300 don't trust him

00:21:27.900 at all.

00:21:29.540 He has no

00:21:30.180 credibility in

00:21:30.980 my view.

00:21:32.860 If you're that

00:21:33.740 much of a

00:21:34.260 whore, you're

00:21:36.720 not credible.

00:21:38.240 He could be

00:21:38.660 right.

00:21:39.460 He could be

00:21:39.940 right.

00:21:40.760 Like I'm not

00:21:41.340 saying he's

00:21:41.740 wrong.

00:21:42.420 I'm saying that I

00:21:43.180 wouldn't believe

00:21:43.680 it because this

00:21:44.320 fucking guy said

00:21:45.020 it.

00:21:45.900 Because here's

00:21:46.620 somebody who

00:21:47.020 just threw the

00:21:47.540 whole country

00:21:48.000 under the bus

00:21:48.660 to write a

00:21:49.120 book.

00:21:50.440 Because we

00:21:51.040 kind of needed

00:21:51.540 to know that,

00:21:52.600 if it's true.

00:21:54.540 So I would

00:21:55.580 say credibility

00:21:56.380 low.

00:21:58.280 Low.

00:21:59.160 Unfortunately.

00:22:00.260 I'd love for his

00:22:01.200 credibility to be

00:22:02.260 high.

00:22:02.960 And I don't

00:22:03.380 know if there's

00:22:04.000 any other

00:22:04.600 knock on his

00:22:07.380 credibility.

00:22:08.120 I don't know

00:22:08.500 about his

00:22:08.840 background or

00:22:09.680 his history.

00:22:10.800 But just that

00:22:11.600 one thing.

00:22:13.360 Anytime you hear

00:22:14.160 that somebody

00:22:14.600 saves their

00:22:15.420 blockbuster

00:22:16.280 whistleblower

00:22:17.540 thing for the

00:22:18.220 book, that's

00:22:22.040 just a big hit

00:22:23.200 on your

00:22:23.520 credibility.

00:22:24.540 That's a big

00:22:25.180 hit.

00:22:26.480 So we'll

00:22:27.060 wait on that.

00:22:29.340 I contend

00:22:30.360 that one of

00:22:32.060 the worst

00:22:32.480 things that

00:22:32.980 came out of

00:22:33.440 World War

00:22:33.900 II,

00:22:34.600 aside from

00:22:36.680 60 million

00:22:37.740 people dying,

00:22:39.520 aside from

00:22:40.180 the Holocaust,

00:22:42.180 aside from

00:22:42.820 all of that,

00:22:44.200 there is a

00:22:44.800 ripple effect

00:22:45.360 from World War

00:22:46.000 II that is

00:22:46.560 really, really

00:22:47.400 hurting us.

00:22:48.780 And it's the

00:22:49.180 fact that we

00:22:49.760 can't make any

00:22:50.800 decisions without

00:22:52.280 comparing it to

00:22:53.720 Hitler.

00:22:55.460 How good is

00:22:56.500 our decision

00:22:57.080 making if we

00:22:57.880 can't make any

00:22:58.520 decisions without

00:22:59.300 the Hitler

00:22:59.700 analogy?

00:23:01.380 It's completely

00:23:02.400 crippled.

00:23:03.080 We are

00:23:05.000 permanently under

00:23:05.880 PTSD because

00:23:07.420 all we can see

00:23:08.100 is Hitler

00:23:08.460 everywhere.

00:23:09.820 It's just

00:23:10.140 Hitler,

00:23:10.500 Hitler,

00:23:10.800 Hitler.

00:23:11.540 If you can't

00:23:12.320 make any

00:23:12.800 political argument

00:23:13.560 without a

00:23:14.080 Hitler analogy,

00:23:15.280 there's no

00:23:16.160 critical thinking

00:23:16.900 happening at

00:23:17.420 all.

00:23:18.340 You're just

00:23:18.920 Hitlerized.

00:23:20.380 You're so

00:23:20.880 Hitlerized.

00:23:21.880 So that's like a

00:23:22.800 permanent PTSD

00:23:23.660 that society has.

00:23:25.080 And it really

00:23:26.840 is hurting us

00:23:27.640 because we

00:23:28.840 can't have

00:23:29.220 anything like

00:23:29.960 an even

00:23:30.620 partially

00:23:32.460 rational discussion

00:23:33.760 if one side

00:23:36.280 is saying,

00:23:36.720 Hitler,

00:23:37.680 Hitler.

00:23:38.700 We'll get to

00:23:39.560 more of that.

00:23:40.420 More of that

00:23:41.000 later.

00:23:41.960 So Michael

00:23:42.360 Schellenberger is

00:23:43.420 the third

00:23:44.160 independent

00:23:44.920 journalist who

00:23:46.500 got access to

00:23:47.280 the Twitter

00:23:47.620 files.

00:23:49.040 So now we've

00:23:49.560 seen Matt

00:23:51.000 Taibbi and

00:23:52.020 Barry Weiss and

00:23:53.440 now Michael

00:23:53.960 Schellenberger.

00:23:54.900 I assume

00:23:55.540 Musk was the

00:23:57.020 one who

00:23:57.440 personally

00:23:58.060 selected or

00:23:59.620 approved the

00:24:00.340 journalists because

00:24:02.080 they have

00:24:02.480 something in

00:24:02.980 common.

00:24:04.340 They're all

00:24:04.860 people who at

00:24:05.780 one point were

00:24:06.500 associated with

00:24:07.220 the left who

00:24:08.820 got a little

00:24:09.700 frustrated with

00:24:10.660 the arguments

00:24:11.160 on the left

00:24:11.820 and though you

00:24:13.080 would not call

00:24:13.660 them Republicans

00:24:14.340 because they

00:24:14.940 wouldn't call

00:24:15.380 themselves

00:24:15.760 Republicans,

00:24:17.040 you could say,

00:24:17.860 oh, here are

00:24:18.520 three people that

00:24:19.520 we know can see

00:24:20.200 both sides of

00:24:20.860 an argument.

00:24:22.760 That alone

00:24:23.860 if nothing

00:24:25.700 else comes out

00:24:26.340 of this Twitter

00:24:26.840 stuff, if the

00:24:28.040 only thing that

00:24:28.680 comes out of

00:24:29.140 this is that

00:24:30.280 there were three

00:24:30.920 independent

00:24:31.520 journalists you

00:24:32.320 could believe,

00:24:33.900 and I say

00:24:34.520 believe not

00:24:35.600 because they

00:24:36.480 will get every

00:24:37.160 fact right for

00:24:37.900 the rest of

00:24:38.360 their lives.

00:24:39.400 That's not a

00:24:40.220 realistic expectation,

00:24:41.740 but you could

00:24:42.360 believe them that

00:24:43.040 they're not

00:24:43.540 intending to

00:24:44.500 lie.

00:24:46.320 They're not

00:24:46.740 intending to

00:24:47.600 lie.

00:24:48.680 They're people

00:24:49.400 who have a

00:24:50.000 history of

00:24:50.920 intending to

00:24:51.760 just let you

00:24:52.340 know what's

00:24:53.100 true.

00:24:54.100 That's very

00:24:54.880 big, and I

00:24:56.080 think it's

00:24:56.360 bigger than

00:24:56.880 the Twitter

00:24:57.420 story by far.

00:24:59.300 Imagine, if

00:25:00.040 you will, and

00:25:01.240 it could be

00:25:01.640 that the

00:25:02.160 whole substack

00:25:03.140 situation is

00:25:05.880 really positive

00:25:07.660 because it

00:25:08.340 could create a

00:25:09.080 virtual,

00:25:10.340 independent

00:25:10.840 journalism,

00:25:11.760 I guess it

00:25:12.200 has, virtual

00:25:13.440 independent

00:25:13.920 journalism tool

00:25:15.620 that the

00:25:17.020 public might

00:25:17.600 actually go

00:25:18.360 to for some

00:25:19.060 good information.

00:25:20.920 So something

00:25:21.520 really good is

00:25:22.220 developing there.

00:25:22.860 Anyway, so

00:25:23.840 Schellenberger, who

00:25:24.760 has my highest

00:25:25.760 confidence for

00:25:27.000 being an

00:25:27.720 independent

00:25:28.120 journalist, he

00:25:31.520 reports, he

00:25:32.120 was at task

00:25:33.120 with only

00:25:33.580 reporting for

00:25:34.140 the few days,

00:25:35.680 I think, around

00:25:36.520 right after

00:25:37.080 January 6th, and

00:25:38.880 one of the big

00:25:39.400 things we found

00:25:40.160 is that a

00:25:41.880 number of people

00:25:42.420 were calling for

00:25:43.520 Trump to be

00:25:44.540 kicked off the

00:25:45.060 platform, including

00:25:46.640 Michelle Obama,

00:25:48.240 Obama, and

00:25:49.880 I think the

00:25:51.020 ADL and

00:25:51.900 some others.

00:25:53.240 So there were

00:25:53.720 calls for him

00:25:54.400 to be kicked

00:25:55.060 off.

00:25:56.400 So here are

00:25:57.280 the people we

00:25:58.340 know Twitter

00:25:59.680 targeted, and

00:26:00.700 you can help me

00:26:01.460 fill in the

00:26:01.960 blanks.

00:26:02.860 We know

00:26:03.380 Twitter targeted

00:26:04.340 Trump, Dan

00:26:06.740 Bongino,

00:26:10.920 the libs of

00:26:13.080 TikTok, James

00:26:15.460 Wood, and who

00:26:17.800 else?

00:26:20.280 Jordan?

00:26:20.960 I didn't see

00:26:21.560 that, but

00:26:22.080 oh, Charlie

00:26:23.040 Kirk, Charlie

00:26:24.840 Kirk.

00:26:27.300 Who else is

00:26:28.240 confirmed?

00:26:30.200 Babylon Bee,

00:26:31.380 well, we know

00:26:31.840 that, right?

00:26:33.740 Matt

00:26:34.240 Gates, is

00:26:34.720 Matt

00:26:34.960 Gates

00:26:35.180 confirmed?

00:26:36.420 Roger Stone

00:26:37.140 confirmed?

00:26:37.740 I haven't seen

00:26:38.200 those confirmed.

00:26:40.120 Confirmed.

00:26:41.260 Could you send

00:26:41.740 me, if there's

00:26:43.040 anything that

00:26:43.540 confirms other

00:26:44.440 people, like

00:26:45.540 Matt Gates

00:26:46.100 and Stone,

00:26:46.780 could you

00:26:47.660 send that?

00:26:48.320 Oh, Breitbart

00:26:48.860 is confirmed.

00:26:51.060 Breitbart's.

00:26:52.200 MGT, is she

00:26:53.120 confirmed?

00:26:54.420 I mean, there's

00:26:54.980 things we saw in

00:26:55.620 the public, but

00:26:57.760 have we confirmed

00:26:58.740 it from the

00:26:59.200 Twitter files that

00:27:00.020 they were

00:27:00.460 targeted?

00:27:01.420 Okay.

00:27:02.540 Oh, you'll send

00:27:03.260 me Matt

00:27:03.600 Gates?

00:27:03.780 thank you.

00:27:05.040 So,

00:27:05.560 so here's the

00:27:10.420 thing.

00:27:13.880 Oh, there's so

00:27:14.620 many angles to

00:27:15.280 this.

00:27:15.620 Let's take the

00:27:16.460 Yoel Roth

00:27:17.280 angle first.

00:27:18.380 As you know,

00:27:19.360 Yoel Roth was

00:27:20.300 in charge of who

00:27:21.620 got banned on

00:27:22.840 Twitter, and he

00:27:24.100 seemed to be

00:27:24.720 operating somewhat

00:27:26.040 independently with

00:27:27.120 at least one other

00:27:27.960 executive, and

00:27:29.460 maybe Jack Dorsey

00:27:30.760 wasn't in the loop

00:27:31.940 on some of this

00:27:32.560 stuff.

00:27:32.820 So, so we know

00:27:33.700 that there was

00:27:35.000 stuff happening

00:27:35.660 outside of Jack

00:27:36.900 Dorsey's direct

00:27:38.760 control, or direct

00:27:40.780 intervention or

00:27:41.840 something, I guess.

00:27:43.160 So that much we

00:27:44.040 know.

00:27:46.720 But it turns out

00:27:48.140 that Yoel Roth,

00:27:50.560 when he was, I

00:27:51.720 think, working on

00:27:52.400 his PhD, wrote a

00:27:54.560 paper, and I'm

00:27:55.300 going to be very

00:27:55.780 careful about how I

00:27:56.800 talk about this.

00:27:57.700 He wrote a paper

00:28:00.040 about the app

00:28:01.540 Grindr, and I

00:28:03.280 don't know what

00:28:04.160 the bigger topic

00:28:04.820 was, but the part

00:28:06.040 we know about.

00:28:07.060 He talked about

00:28:07.720 the app Grindr,

00:28:08.880 which is for gay

00:28:09.880 people to do

00:28:10.600 hookups.

00:28:12.560 And he mentioned

00:28:13.500 that there were

00:28:14.420 underage people who

00:28:16.500 were not legally

00:28:17.420 allowed on the app,

00:28:18.680 but they would

00:28:19.140 sneak on.

00:28:19.720 So there were a

00:28:20.200 lot of young

00:28:20.720 people under 18

00:28:21.780 on the app.

00:28:22.800 In his paper, he

00:28:26.800 asked the question,

00:28:29.080 should we only be

00:28:31.500 working on getting

00:28:32.220 them off the app,

00:28:33.560 or is there a way

00:28:34.600 to take into

00:28:35.600 consideration that

00:28:37.480 they're going to

00:28:37.900 get on the app no

00:28:38.660 matter what, and

00:28:40.260 that maybe you

00:28:40.880 should treat them

00:28:41.780 in some way that's

00:28:42.680 better for society?

00:28:44.560 Is there any

00:28:45.200 positive way to

00:28:46.880 make it better

00:28:47.640 keeping underage

00:28:49.280 people on a sex

00:28:50.320 app?

00:28:50.580 Now, from a

00:28:54.000 purely academic

00:28:55.260 perspective, is

00:28:57.720 that a fair

00:28:58.180 question?

00:28:59.320 From a purely

00:29:00.420 academic perspective,

00:29:01.940 which is the

00:29:02.660 context, is that a

00:29:04.180 fair question?

00:29:05.660 Yes, it is.

00:29:06.500 Of course it is.

00:29:07.600 It's a fair

00:29:08.160 question.

00:29:08.720 Because the

00:29:09.180 question is, how

00:29:09.800 do you reduce

00:29:10.500 harm to

00:29:11.720 children?

00:29:13.720 And I don't

00:29:14.900 think he had a

00:29:15.940 conclusion.

00:29:17.200 I think he said,

00:29:18.080 we have to at

00:29:19.080 least be realistic

00:29:19.840 and say, they're

00:29:21.380 already being

00:29:21.960 harmed.

00:29:23.080 Is there anything

00:29:23.660 you can do to

00:29:24.300 help?

00:29:26.260 All right.

00:29:28.220 My sound is good

00:29:29.300 on my end, so if

00:29:30.160 there's something

00:29:30.540 happening, I can't

00:29:32.580 control it.

00:29:34.880 So, all right.

00:29:38.460 So, somebody

00:29:41.240 researched that and

00:29:42.660 found out that that

00:29:43.460 was in his

00:29:44.080 background.

00:29:44.580 And then, Elon

00:29:47.500 Musk actually

00:29:48.580 tweeted it.

00:29:50.400 Elon Musk actually

00:29:51.540 tweeted that it

00:29:54.040 explains a lot.

00:29:56.040 It explains a lot

00:29:57.560 that the guy in

00:29:58.380 charge of who gets

00:29:59.320 kicked off the

00:30:00.400 system had written

00:30:02.980 a paper questioning

00:30:04.460 whether children

00:30:05.660 should be on a

00:30:06.320 sex app.

00:30:07.820 Now, remember,

00:30:08.720 Twitter was also

00:30:09.700 being accused of

00:30:11.240 not taking seriously

00:30:12.380 enough, the

00:30:13.680 pedophiles that

00:30:14.480 were active on

00:30:15.240 Twitter.

00:30:18.220 So, you see

00:30:19.660 that this all

00:30:20.280 ends up looking

00:30:21.260 like the same

00:30:21.880 thing.

00:30:23.040 So, I would

00:30:25.080 like to point

00:30:26.120 out that Elon

00:30:28.260 Musk now holds

00:30:29.340 the record for

00:30:31.200 the most extreme

00:30:32.460 firing of an

00:30:33.540 employee I've

00:30:34.340 ever seen.

00:30:36.600 Sometimes you

00:30:37.380 just get fired.

00:30:38.920 Oh, we have to

00:30:39.740 downsize.

00:30:40.260 I'm sorry.

00:30:41.480 You'll have to

00:30:42.000 go.

00:30:42.800 Bad enough.

00:30:43.800 That's a bad

00:30:44.400 day.

00:30:45.420 But imagine

00:30:45.960 being fired and

00:30:47.820 then within a

00:30:48.520 week, the person

00:30:49.860 who fired you

00:30:50.560 outs you on

00:30:51.540 Twitter as

00:30:52.720 pedophile friendly.

00:30:55.440 That is more

00:30:56.480 fired than anybody

00:30:58.120 has ever been

00:30:58.980 fired.

00:31:00.100 You can't get

00:31:00.780 fired harder

00:31:01.580 than that.

00:31:02.920 Now, let me

00:31:04.020 very quickly say

00:31:06.200 that there is no

00:31:07.780 accusation that

00:31:10.060 Yoel Roth was

00:31:11.580 involved in any

00:31:12.400 way with any

00:31:13.700 underage promotion

00:31:15.680 of kids or

00:31:16.780 activity, right?

00:31:17.940 There is no, no,

00:31:19.360 no evidence that

00:31:21.380 he personally is

00:31:22.580 friendly with any

00:31:25.540 pedo stuff, right?

00:31:26.640 I want to be as

00:31:27.420 clear as possible.

00:31:28.520 I don't think he's

00:31:29.520 been accused and

00:31:31.260 there's no evidence

00:31:31.900 I've seen that would

00:31:32.700 suggest it

00:31:33.220 whatsoever.

00:31:33.580 You're worried, but

00:31:36.100 that's a different

00:31:36.640 subject.

00:31:38.720 But it does seem

00:31:39.680 to be true that

00:31:42.080 someone with a

00:31:43.320 documented

00:31:44.440 background of

00:31:46.060 being, let's say,

00:31:47.280 flexible, flexible

00:31:50.560 with underage

00:31:51.800 stuff was in

00:31:54.340 charge of making

00:31:54.960 sure there wasn't

00:31:55.620 any on, or at

00:31:57.240 least he was one

00:31:57.740 of the people who

00:31:58.700 could have been

00:31:59.180 involved in getting

00:32:00.460 rid of the pedo

00:32:01.620 stuff on Twitter.

00:32:02.240 Now, that's about

00:32:03.720 as bad as you

00:32:04.660 can, that's like

00:32:05.920 the worst situation

00:32:06.700 you can even

00:32:07.100 imagine.

00:32:09.120 But the fact that

00:32:10.620 Musk actually

00:32:11.740 tweeted that out,

00:32:14.840 I've, that's the

00:32:16.460 most aggressive

00:32:17.200 firing I've ever

00:32:19.420 seen in my life.

00:32:20.860 I've never seen

00:32:21.460 anybody fired

00:32:22.080 harder than that.

00:32:23.280 That's as fired

00:32:24.280 as you can get.

00:32:26.260 Wow.

00:32:26.820 Wow.

00:32:27.700 So,

00:32:27.920 here's a question.

00:32:35.340 Did Jack Dorsey

00:32:36.960 lie to Congress?

00:32:38.200 I just watched

00:32:38.760 the clip of it.

00:32:41.460 And he was

00:32:43.920 asked if, let's

00:32:46.000 see, what was the

00:32:46.460 exact question?

00:32:50.260 Does Twitter, quote,

00:32:52.940 try to censor

00:32:53.940 conservative voices?

00:32:55.140 Does Twitter censor

00:32:59.640 conservative voices?

00:33:02.120 And Jack said, no.

00:33:04.180 And he was sitting

00:33:04.840 right next to the

00:33:05.620 person who was in

00:33:06.320 charge of the

00:33:07.940 censoring.

00:33:09.240 Is that a lie?

00:33:12.440 Well, what would be

00:33:13.400 the evidence, what

00:33:14.640 would be the evidence

00:33:15.500 that Twitter censors

00:33:17.860 conservatives?

00:33:18.740 What's the evidence

00:33:19.520 we've seen so far?

00:33:20.420 We've seen Trump,

00:33:23.880 you know, Kirk,

00:33:25.100 Bongino, and they're

00:33:26.840 all Republicans,

00:33:28.360 right?

00:33:29.120 Or at least

00:33:29.800 conservatives.

00:33:31.640 True or false,

00:33:32.700 100% of the people

00:33:33.760 we know have been

00:33:34.600 targeted, that we

00:33:35.280 know, just the ones

00:33:36.780 we know, are all

00:33:38.380 conservatives.

00:33:39.120 True.

00:33:40.220 True, right?

00:33:40.920 Is it also true that

00:33:42.800 each of them had a

00:33:44.480 specific terms of

00:33:46.280 service infraction or

00:33:49.920 could be interpreted

00:33:51.560 as an infraction?

00:33:52.760 Is that true or

00:33:53.320 not?

00:33:56.380 Berenson was not

00:33:57.900 conservative, but he

00:33:58.780 was certainly siding

00:33:59.660 with them in this.

00:34:04.500 No?

00:34:05.280 Yes?

00:34:05.940 False?

00:34:06.980 All right.

00:34:08.220 So, here's the

00:34:09.460 question.

00:34:10.900 In terms of a

00:34:12.640 courtroom, if

00:34:14.620 somebody says, I

00:34:15.500 have 10 examples of

00:34:17.380 conservatives who

00:34:18.360 were banned, but we

00:34:20.720 used an excuse in

00:34:22.220 each case, there

00:34:23.620 was like a specific

00:34:24.560 harm that we

00:34:27.420 called out that

00:34:29.060 these 10 people

00:34:29.900 were engaged in.

00:34:32.040 So, does that

00:34:32.540 prove, if you know

00:34:34.020 that those 10

00:34:34.680 things are true, or

00:34:36.580 even 20, whatever

00:34:38.180 it is, if you know

00:34:39.220 that there are 10

00:34:39.900 absolutely confirmed

00:34:41.220 cases where people

00:34:42.820 were shadowbanned,

00:34:44.700 does that mean that

00:34:46.360 they had a policy of

00:34:47.620 shadowbanning

00:34:48.280 conservatives, if you

00:34:49.720 knew those were all

00:34:50.660 true, all 10 of

00:34:51.480 them, and you knew

00:34:53.000 that there was no

00:34:53.800 example, not one

00:34:54.660 example, of a

00:34:56.320 Democrat being

00:34:57.400 ...

00:34:57.700 Unfortunately, it's

00:35:00.080 just examples.

00:35:01.380 It's just examples.

00:35:03.340 Right?

00:35:04.140 And those examples

00:35:05.400 could be explained

00:35:06.520 another way just as

00:35:08.780 easily.

00:35:09.120 So, one

00:35:11.640 explanation is that

00:35:12.640 Twitter conspired and

00:35:14.440 were consciously

00:35:15.160 trying to suppress

00:35:16.920 conservatives, and

00:35:18.440 everything that

00:35:19.140 happened looks

00:35:19.700 exactly like that,

00:35:20.680 right?

00:35:21.660 Well, I definitely

00:35:22.760 would agree that

00:35:24.180 what we've seen looks

00:35:25.260 exactly like that's

00:35:26.480 true, but

00:35:27.980 suggestive of.

00:35:30.520 In other words,

00:35:31.060 there's nothing that's

00:35:31.800 counterfactual to it.

00:35:33.780 There's nothing that

00:35:34.560 rules it out, and

00:35:35.840 it certainly looks

00:35:36.440 exactly like it.

00:35:38.240 But the evidence we

00:35:39.900 have only supports

00:35:42.140 that they acted that

00:35:43.880 way, which is

00:35:45.720 different than a

00:35:46.360 policy.

00:35:47.620 And why would they

00:35:48.580 act that way unless

00:35:49.620 they had a policy?

00:35:51.440 Why would everybody

00:35:52.480 act the same way

00:35:53.720 unless there was a

00:35:55.180 policy?

00:35:56.440 And the answer is

00:35:57.300 more obvious than a

00:35:58.400 policy, because they

00:35:59.780 were all Democrats.

00:36:01.260 They just had the

00:36:01.960 same worldview.

00:36:03.300 So when they looked

00:36:04.060 for harm, they all

00:36:05.780 saw it in the same

00:36:06.480 place.

00:36:06.880 And when they

00:36:08.480 looked for harm

00:36:09.180 caused by Democrats,

00:36:10.620 they just didn't

00:36:11.160 see it.

00:36:12.340 So their job was to

00:36:13.520 get rid of harm, so

00:36:15.360 they got rid of the

00:36:16.020 harm they could see,

00:36:17.620 which to them was

00:36:19.160 all a bunch of

00:36:19.900 conservative stuff.

00:36:21.360 They did not get

00:36:22.360 rid of the harm that

00:36:23.120 they didn't see,

00:36:24.620 because to them it

00:36:25.380 didn't look harmful.

00:36:27.320 And so would that

00:36:29.180 be considered Twitter

00:36:31.380 having a, let's say,

00:36:33.300 a policy of

00:36:35.180 discriminating against

00:36:36.880 conservatives.

00:36:38.260 Because if Jack

00:36:39.200 says, no, we don't

00:36:40.180 have a policy, I

00:36:43.000 don't see anything

00:36:43.860 that says that's a

00:36:44.740 lie.

00:36:46.360 Because no document

00:36:47.600 has said, let's get

00:36:48.840 these conservatives.

00:36:50.600 No person has, no

00:36:52.060 person has testified

00:36:53.540 that, yes, we were

00:36:55.120 after conservatives.

00:36:55.960 So you have no

00:36:57.940 testimony and no

00:36:59.620 documents that would

00:37:01.620 refute what Jack

00:37:02.820 said in Congress.

00:37:04.660 There's no

00:37:05.260 counterfactual.

00:37:06.660 The only evidence

00:37:08.080 you have is not

00:37:09.520 conclusive, it's

00:37:10.840 anecdotal.

00:37:12.500 Anecdotal evidence

00:37:13.540 has no legal value,

00:37:17.340 really, unless there's

00:37:19.120 just tons of it, and

00:37:20.000 then you can make a

00:37:21.560 case based on

00:37:23.320 circumstantial evidence.

00:37:24.620 But this is not even

00:37:26.340 close to that level.

00:37:28.520 This is one anecdote

00:37:29.620 that's just repeated.

00:37:32.720 Now, imagine a jury

00:37:34.700 trial.

00:37:36.140 Imagine you took just

00:37:37.340 what you have now and

00:37:38.180 you didn't learn

00:37:38.640 anything else, and you

00:37:39.380 took it to a jury.

00:37:40.760 You said, hey, jury,

00:37:42.000 we found all these

00:37:43.000 cases of conservatives

00:37:44.280 being suppressed and

00:37:46.100 no cases of anybody

00:37:47.220 else being suppressed.

00:37:48.740 So there's our case.

00:37:51.120 And then what does

00:37:52.660 the jury say?

00:37:53.540 In their minds, they

00:37:55.120 say, well, where's

00:37:56.840 this information come

00:37:57.760 from?

00:37:58.860 How do we know it's

00:37:59.640 just ten conservatives?

00:38:01.340 Who told us?

00:38:02.660 Oh, three people who

00:38:04.480 are identified as being

00:38:05.820 friendly to the right

00:38:06.940 told us that the left

00:38:10.160 was discriminating.

00:38:11.280 That's how you know?

00:38:12.720 Your source is only

00:38:13.820 people on the right

00:38:14.780 looked at things you

00:38:16.560 haven't looked at and

00:38:17.380 we can't see.

00:38:18.360 We don't know if they

00:38:19.380 skipped anything.

00:38:20.320 We just know that

00:38:21.940 they only told us

00:38:23.380 about the people on

00:38:24.720 the right, which is

00:38:25.440 exactly what people

00:38:27.040 who lean right would

00:38:28.000 tell you.

00:38:29.840 You see that you

00:38:30.900 can never get a

00:38:31.520 conviction based on

00:38:34.860 what you have now.

00:38:36.660 Right?

00:38:38.360 Now, I'm definitely

00:38:40.300 not telling you that

00:38:42.180 I know whether Twitter

00:38:43.440 did or did not, you

00:38:44.740 know, collude or

00:38:45.980 scheme to take down

00:38:47.720 Democrats or take

00:38:49.520 down Republicans.

00:38:50.560 I don't know.

00:38:51.920 Anything, you know,

00:38:52.940 certainly we found

00:38:54.100 anything's possible.

00:38:55.520 Like every other news

00:38:56.660 story teaches this

00:38:58.320 lesson.

00:38:59.960 You know those people

00:39:00.780 you thought you could

00:39:01.520 trust?

00:39:02.500 Not so much.

00:39:03.920 That's like every news

00:39:04.960 story.

00:39:06.060 Every news story is the

00:39:07.020 same.

00:39:08.040 So, I'd like to talk

00:39:11.640 to you about the bad

00:39:12.660 arguments on my team.

00:39:15.180 My team is the

00:39:16.480 following.

00:39:16.820 My team is anybody

00:39:19.260 who thinks that

00:39:20.960 Twitter did some

00:39:22.680 things that were

00:39:23.380 bad, at least in

00:39:25.300 terms of the outcome,

00:39:26.680 and would like to

00:39:27.420 know more about it

00:39:28.220 and thinks we need to

00:39:29.380 be kind of aggressive

00:39:30.460 in getting to the

00:39:31.560 bottom of it.

00:39:32.400 That's my team.

00:39:33.720 And my team also

00:39:34.640 thinks that there

00:39:35.220 are probably some bad

00:39:36.040 things that happened.

00:39:37.280 Right?

00:39:37.760 But what I don't like

00:39:39.080 is when people who

00:39:40.400 agree with me on the

00:39:41.360 big picture have

00:39:42.960 arguments that are

00:39:43.800 absurd.

00:39:44.160 So, I'm going to

00:39:45.840 talk about the people

00:39:46.560 who agree with me

00:39:47.620 that Twitter did a

00:39:49.560 bad thing and we

00:39:50.280 need to figure out

00:39:51.020 how to stop it and

00:39:52.280 know what happened.

00:39:54.560 Don't do the

00:39:55.380 following arguments.

00:39:57.800 I don't like the

00:39:58.860 argument that Jack

00:40:00.460 lied to Congress

00:40:01.460 because we don't

00:40:02.300 have evidence of

00:40:03.040 that.

00:40:03.780 We have evidence

00:40:04.540 that he said

00:40:05.260 things.

00:40:06.660 We have only

00:40:07.320 evidence that he

00:40:08.000 talked.

00:40:09.440 Evidence that

00:40:10.120 somebody talked

00:40:11.120 and said something

00:40:12.440 you didn't think

00:40:13.240 they should have

00:40:14.140 said is not

00:40:14.880 evidence of a

00:40:16.080 crime.

00:40:17.700 We don't know

00:40:18.480 why he knew,

00:40:19.620 right?

00:40:20.060 Because that's

00:40:20.520 important.

00:40:21.540 What did Jack

00:40:22.200 know?

00:40:23.260 Because there's

00:40:23.980 plenty of evidence

00:40:24.820 in the documentation

00:40:25.880 that he was not

00:40:27.160 brought into all

00:40:28.040 of the decisions.

00:40:29.560 He was brought

00:40:30.240 into the top ones

00:40:31.020 but not all of them.

00:40:33.720 So, I don't like

00:40:34.760 the argument that

00:40:35.540 Jack lied unless

00:40:36.740 you have some

00:40:37.240 evidence.

00:40:38.440 And there's no

00:40:38.960 evidence he lied.

00:40:39.780 It might be true

00:40:41.860 but no evidence

00:40:43.240 has been presented.

00:40:44.920 So, that's a

00:40:45.480 weak argument.

00:40:47.340 Which could turn

00:40:48.220 into a strong

00:40:49.640 argument if we had

00:40:50.400 different information

00:40:51.300 but with what we

00:40:52.080 have.

00:40:53.140 How about this

00:40:53.700 one?

00:40:54.300 People said,

00:40:55.640 I noted that it

00:40:57.640 appeared from the

00:40:58.360 internal documentation

00:40:59.280 that the people who

00:41:01.080 worked at Twitter

00:41:01.700 believed they were

00:41:02.720 doing something good

00:41:03.820 for the country.

00:41:04.800 Would you agree?

00:41:06.440 Now, it's not

00:41:07.520 your opinion but from

00:41:09.600 what we've seen,

00:41:10.480 doesn't it look like

00:41:11.200 they thought they

00:41:11.800 were doing the

00:41:12.240 right thing?

00:41:15.220 And then people

00:41:16.040 said to me,

00:41:16.820 Scott, Scott, Scott,

00:41:18.600 oh, you were so

00:41:19.460 in the wrong place

00:41:20.860 on this.

00:41:22.020 It doesn't matter

00:41:22.840 what they thought.

00:41:23.720 Why?

00:41:24.280 Why doesn't it

00:41:25.200 matter what they

00:41:25.880 were thinking?

00:41:27.520 Why is it

00:41:28.240 irrelevant that they

00:41:29.180 thought they were

00:41:29.800 doing the right

00:41:30.380 thing?

00:41:32.740 Go ahead, say it.

00:41:35.100 Say it.

00:41:37.240 Say it.

00:41:37.900 Say it.

00:41:39.600 There you go.

00:41:40.880 Thank you.

00:41:42.620 Hitler.

00:41:45.440 Because we're

00:41:46.740 poisoned by Hitler

00:41:47.900 analogies, we can't

00:41:50.240 think of this

00:41:50.700 correctly.

00:41:52.000 We don't have the

00:41:53.140 capability to look at

00:41:54.520 this situation in any

00:41:56.500 rational way because

00:41:58.200 we're all crippled.

00:41:59.920 We're all crippled by

00:42:01.340 Hitler.

00:42:02.340 It's all we can see.

00:42:03.460 If all you see is

00:42:05.700 Hitler in this

00:42:06.420 situation, you're

00:42:08.440 not putting any

00:42:10.260 kind of critical

00:42:10.940 thought on it.

00:42:12.100 You're just

00:42:12.600 Hitler poisoned.

00:42:14.200 So anybody who

00:42:15.860 brings up Hitler in

00:42:17.520 any situations that's

00:42:18.760 not literally,

00:42:19.840 actually the

00:42:20.460 Holocaust, they

00:42:22.900 just have Hitler

00:42:23.600 poisoning, and you

00:42:24.780 should ignore

00:42:25.240 everything they say.

00:42:26.920 It's just Hitler

00:42:27.840 poisoning.

00:42:28.240 Now, some people

00:42:30.340 said to me, Scott, it

00:42:32.280 doesn't matter that

00:42:33.180 they had good

00:42:33.820 intentions in their

00:42:34.760 own mind, right?

00:42:36.660 It only matters how

00:42:37.920 they acted because

00:42:39.560 of the Hitler

00:42:40.840 argument.

00:42:42.300 Those Nazis thought

00:42:43.380 they were doing maybe

00:42:44.420 something good for the

00:42:45.320 world.

00:42:45.640 So, just like

00:42:48.420 Nazis, right?

00:42:49.860 Twitter employees,

00:42:51.240 Nazis, exactly the

00:42:52.980 same.

00:42:53.440 They thought they

00:42:54.040 were doing something

00:42:54.720 good, but you

00:42:55.440 can't excuse them

00:42:59.300 for that, can you?

00:43:00.740 Because I was told

00:43:01.860 that people's

00:43:03.160 intentions are

00:43:04.380 irrelevant.

00:43:05.900 If what they do is

00:43:07.160 evil, they must be

00:43:08.780 held accountable for

00:43:09.600 the evil.

00:43:10.520 Their internal

00:43:11.180 thoughts are

00:43:11.740 irrelevant to that,

00:43:12.560 right?

00:43:13.220 Would everybody

00:43:13.700 agree with that?

00:43:14.300 That it's what

00:43:15.720 they do that

00:43:16.400 matters, it's not

00:43:17.820 what they're

00:43:18.120 thinking.

00:43:18.640 Their internal

00:43:19.140 intentions, and

00:43:20.240 would you agree

00:43:20.760 that internal

00:43:21.560 intentions don't

00:43:23.160 have any role in

00:43:24.860 the legal system?

00:43:27.000 Would you agree

00:43:27.580 that the legal

00:43:28.140 system does not

00:43:29.640 care what your

00:43:30.360 internal thinking

00:43:31.180 is?

00:43:31.500 It only cares

00:43:31.940 what you did,

00:43:33.000 right?

00:43:33.900 And that's why

00:43:35.060 we treat self-defense

00:43:36.680 the same as

00:43:37.880 murder.

00:43:39.080 So, if you kill

00:43:40.100 somebody in self-defense,

00:43:41.320 let's say you blow

00:43:41.900 their head off,

00:43:42.920 that's why they put

00:43:43.860 you in jail for

00:43:44.980 exactly the same

00:43:45.900 amount as if you

00:43:47.480 murdered them with

00:43:48.340 premeditation.

00:43:49.740 Because your

00:43:50.420 intention doesn't

00:43:51.080 make any difference

00:43:51.740 in the legal

00:43:52.240 system.

00:43:53.080 It only matters

00:43:53.720 that you killed

00:43:54.180 somebody.

00:43:56.520 What?

00:43:57.960 What?

00:43:59.080 Oh, you're saying

00:43:59.880 that those are

00:44:00.340 treated differently.

00:44:02.040 Oh, oh.

00:44:03.380 So, now you're

00:44:04.180 changing your

00:44:04.660 opinion that the

00:44:06.280 intention of the

00:44:07.140 act actually is

00:44:08.120 completely determinative

00:44:09.720 of how you're

00:44:10.900 treated.

00:44:11.180 Huh.

00:44:13.860 Please, don't

00:44:18.280 tell me that the

00:44:19.000 intention doesn't

00:44:19.900 matter.

00:44:21.040 The intention is

00:44:21.840 all that matters.

00:44:23.300 It's all that

00:44:23.920 matters.

00:44:25.620 For understanding

00:44:26.780 how to deal

00:44:27.940 with it, how to

00:44:28.520 fix it, whether

00:44:29.940 or not there's any

00:44:30.720 legal repercussions,

00:44:32.600 the intention is

00:44:34.200 all that matters.

00:44:35.600 It's, like, way,

00:44:36.480 way the most

00:44:37.120 important thing.

00:44:37.760 Because, um, in

00:44:44.000 all likelihood, in

00:44:46.440 all likelihood, what

00:44:47.600 we've found out so

00:44:48.560 far is exactly what

00:44:50.460 Jack Dorsey told

00:44:51.700 you a year ago.

00:44:54.220 A year ago, Jack

00:44:55.620 Dorsey told you we

00:44:56.680 have too many

00:44:57.460 Democrats, and so

00:44:59.020 we're probably acting

00:44:59.920 like Democrats when

00:45:02.240 we're making

00:45:02.660 decisions.

00:45:03.180 I mean, I'm

00:45:04.980 paraphrasing, but he

00:45:05.840 said that directly, and

00:45:07.460 I think probably more

00:45:08.220 than once.

00:45:09.540 He, he, even Jack

00:45:10.900 Dorsey said, whoa,

00:45:11.860 whoa, whoa, we've

00:45:12.300 got too many lefties

00:45:13.140 here, so we're

00:45:14.460 acting like a lefty

00:45:15.460 organization, when

00:45:16.940 that was never the

00:45:17.680 point of it.

00:45:18.620 Like, he didn't

00:45:19.240 approve of it.

00:45:20.160 He used that as a

00:45:21.640 criticism of his own

00:45:22.920 entity, that it was

00:45:24.800 too lefty.

00:45:26.160 Now, here are two

00:45:28.540 possibilities to how

00:45:29.980 everything you saw

00:45:31.140 could happen.

00:45:32.540 One possibility, it

00:45:34.240 was an explicit

00:45:35.120 Twitter policy to

00:45:37.180 suppress conservatives,

00:45:39.280 and that would fit

00:45:40.000 everything you've

00:45:40.680 seen.

00:45:41.600 Would you agree?

00:45:43.100 A hundred percent of

00:45:44.000 what you've seen so

00:45:44.720 far would be

00:45:45.340 compatible with that

00:45:46.260 theory, that they

00:45:47.540 were actually,

00:45:48.960 literally, knowingly

00:45:50.540 just suppressing

00:45:52.440 opinions they didn't

00:45:53.780 like.

00:45:55.580 Totally fits the

00:45:56.620 facts.

00:45:57.800 Here's something

00:45:58.580 else that fits the

00:45:59.340 facts.

00:45:59.680 nothing like that

00:46:01.600 was happening, but

00:46:02.960 they were all

00:46:03.440 Democrats, and so

00:46:05.480 they just saw the

00:46:06.200 world through a

00:46:06.760 Democrat lens.

00:46:08.120 When they looked at

00:46:09.060 Trump, they saw

00:46:09.960 a monster.

00:46:11.420 When they looked at,

00:46:12.480 I don't know,

00:46:14.020 grooming, as you

00:46:15.600 would say, grooming

00:46:16.900 in schools, maybe

00:46:18.540 they just saw

00:46:19.300 progressive sexual

00:46:21.240 education.

00:46:22.680 It didn't look

00:46:23.520 dangerous to them.

00:46:24.900 Maybe when you saw

00:46:25.800 Antifa, you saw a

00:46:27.540 domestic terror group,

00:46:28.580 maybe they saw

00:46:30.260 protesters for

00:46:31.980 Black Lives Matter,

00:46:34.140 like, you know,

00:46:34.780 good people and a

00:46:35.940 good cause.

00:46:37.340 Couldn't you get to

00:46:38.260 the same place?

00:46:40.340 Wouldn't everything

00:46:41.440 you've seen be

00:46:42.220 explained just by

00:46:43.460 having lots of

00:46:44.080 Democrats there?

00:46:45.640 Couldn't you explain

00:46:46.400 all of it with

00:46:48.080 that?

00:46:49.480 Because you can,

00:46:50.960 very easily.

00:46:52.600 There's no stretch,

00:46:53.820 there's no spin,

00:46:55.380 there's no pretzel

00:46:56.600 logic, it's just

00:46:58.060 right down the

00:46:58.640 middle.

00:46:59.960 How about everybody

00:47:00.940 was a Democrat and

00:47:01.980 so they acted like

00:47:02.760 Democrats?

00:47:06.000 Or, it's a big old

00:47:07.600 conspiracy and they

00:47:09.300 were secretly trying

00:47:10.200 to change the country

00:47:11.120 but yet it didn't

00:47:12.280 show up in any of

00:47:12.960 their documentation and

00:47:14.040 there's not a single

00:47:14.760 whistleblower, not a

00:47:16.320 single whistleblower

00:47:17.260 says, yeah, we talked

00:47:18.860 about it, we were just

00:47:19.600 trying to put down the

00:47:20.940 conservatives.

00:47:22.060 Not one?

00:47:23.140 There's not one

00:47:23.800 whistleblower in all of

00:47:24.780 Twitter.

00:47:26.020 Really?

00:47:27.260 Not one whistleblower

00:47:28.540 to say, oh yeah, we

00:47:30.120 actually just talked

00:47:30.880 about this privately

00:47:31.740 and it was just all

00:47:33.020 about suppressing.

00:47:34.180 Not one.

00:47:36.640 Now, maybe we get

00:47:37.740 one.

00:47:39.080 Now, and I want to

00:47:39.700 be as clear as

00:47:40.740 possible, later when

00:47:42.600 you tell me I'm

00:47:43.420 wrong, if new

00:47:45.320 information comes up,

00:47:46.860 no, you're wrong

00:47:47.540 again.

00:47:48.120 That would be you

00:47:48.780 being wrong twice.

00:47:50.460 If new information

00:47:51.820 comes out, then I

00:47:53.440 might change my

00:47:54.100 opinion, based on

00:47:55.780 the new information.

00:47:57.200 That's not wrong.

00:47:58.300 I'm telling you we

00:47:59.180 don't know what's

00:48:00.940 going on because we

00:48:01.680 don't have the

00:48:02.120 information.

00:48:02.680 So don't act like

00:48:03.520 you know when you

00:48:04.840 don't know.

00:48:06.680 Right?

00:48:07.360 So if later we

00:48:08.380 know, then I'll say,

00:48:09.540 oh yeah, now we

00:48:10.100 know.

00:48:11.840 All right.

00:48:16.940 All right.

00:48:19.520 And so we've not

00:48:20.460 seen any direct

00:48:21.200 evidence that

00:48:21.980 Twitter was

00:48:23.380 targeting

00:48:24.360 conservatives.

00:48:25.400 We've seen

00:48:25.980 anecdotes, which

00:48:27.040 are very convincing

00:48:28.120 and could mean

00:48:30.200 that they had said

00:48:30.820 it directly, but

00:48:32.420 we're short of

00:48:32.940 that standard.

00:48:38.300 Let's see.

00:48:41.960 And more to

00:48:42.760 that point.

00:48:46.620 What is your

00:48:47.460 point of view on

00:48:48.060 the following three

00:48:48.760 things?

00:48:49.120 If you complained

00:48:50.120 that the 2020

00:48:50.940 election looked

00:48:51.800 rigged, are you

00:48:53.700 trying to protect

00:48:54.640 the public or

00:48:55.400 destroy it?

00:48:56.540 No.

00:48:57.440 The people who

00:48:58.820 said 2020 was

00:48:59.780 rigged, were they

00:49:02.340 trying to protect

00:49:03.080 the republic or

00:49:04.440 destroy it?

00:49:07.140 Sort of the point

00:49:07.980 of view, isn't it?

00:49:09.460 People on the right

00:49:10.580 say they're

00:49:10.980 protecting it.

00:49:11.640 People on the left

00:49:12.220 say they're

00:49:12.620 destroying it.

00:49:13.200 How about if

00:49:15.500 you were a

00:49:16.120 January 6er and

00:49:17.960 you protested, were

00:49:19.100 you trying to

00:49:19.780 overthrow the

00:49:20.460 republic or were

00:49:21.660 you trying to

00:49:22.060 protect it?

00:49:23.100 Were you trying to

00:49:23.660 overthrow the

00:49:24.260 republic or protect

00:49:26.040 it?

00:49:27.600 Conservatives would

00:49:28.260 say protect.

00:49:29.740 Democrats would

00:49:30.400 say overthrow.

00:49:33.140 And likewise, if

00:49:34.200 you were Twitter,

00:49:34.900 were you trying to

00:49:35.500 protect the public

00:49:36.260 or were you trying

00:49:36.780 to rig an election?

00:49:37.600 If you were the

00:49:39.600 Twitter employees,

00:49:40.440 were you trying to

00:49:40.900 protect the country

00:49:41.740 or a Reagan

00:49:42.300 election?

00:49:45.080 Both.

00:49:46.520 Maybe both.

00:49:48.380 Yeah, maybe both.

00:49:49.780 Those are not

00:49:50.460 really separable.

00:49:52.500 There's news that

00:49:53.600 Trump turned down

00:49:54.880 a prisoner swap

00:49:55.920 for that arms

00:49:57.340 dealer I talked

00:49:58.000 about, Victor

00:49:58.560 Bout, for just

00:50:00.220 Paul Whelan.

00:50:01.220 So before the

00:50:01.840 WNBA player was

00:50:03.060 nabbed, Trump

00:50:04.900 had the offer of

00:50:06.600 the arms dealer

00:50:07.320 for the ex-Marine

00:50:09.440 and he turned it

00:50:10.920 down, according

00:50:12.440 to John Bolton.

00:50:14.400 Is John Bolton

00:50:15.400 an accurate source

00:50:16.880 for Trump-related

00:50:18.620 behind-the-scenes

00:50:19.500 information?

00:50:20.260 No.

00:50:20.800 No, he's not.

00:50:22.100 No.

00:50:22.680 So there may be

00:50:23.700 some context here

00:50:24.640 that's missing.

00:50:26.500 Now, I would not

00:50:28.460 be surprised if he

00:50:29.680 turned down the

00:50:30.300 deal.

00:50:31.740 But there's a

00:50:32.800 big difference

00:50:34.120 between that

00:50:35.820 and, you know,

00:50:38.420 the simple version

00:50:39.320 we're hearing.

00:50:40.000 There may be more

00:50:40.820 to it.

00:50:41.880 So I don't know.

00:50:42.840 Could be technically

00:50:43.600 true, but missing

00:50:44.880 some detail.

00:50:47.260 All right.

00:50:47.920 Here's some really

00:50:48.880 interesting events.

00:50:51.060 You might know that

00:50:52.040 Carrie Lake has

00:50:52.720 filed a lawsuit

00:50:53.480 about the midterms

00:50:54.600 and her Arizona

00:50:56.340 situation.

00:50:56.920 and part of her

00:51:00.220 filing includes

00:51:02.580 the claim that

00:51:04.800 they got an

00:51:05.720 expert on voting

00:51:07.000 machines and

00:51:07.980 they specifically

00:51:08.640 got an expert

00:51:09.520 on these kinds

00:51:17.300 of voting

00:51:17.680 machines.

00:51:19.020 All right.

00:51:19.300 So Carrie Lake

00:51:20.220 gets an expert on

00:51:22.220 these kinds of

00:51:23.060 voting machines.

00:51:23.680 And the expert

00:51:24.740 says that the

00:51:26.400 mass problems

00:51:27.260 they had with

00:51:27.740 the voting

00:51:28.080 machines on

00:51:28.680 election day

00:51:29.300 could not have

00:51:31.040 been created

00:51:31.880 unintentionally.

00:51:36.280 What?

00:51:39.000 From a technical

00:51:40.200 perspective, it

00:51:41.560 couldn't have been

00:51:42.200 an accident.

00:51:44.320 Now, that's

00:51:46.180 one of those

00:51:46.700 opinions that,

00:51:48.760 you know, you

00:51:49.160 could imagine

00:51:49.680 another expert

00:51:50.440 saying, oh,

00:51:50.880 yeah, it could

00:51:51.820 be an accident.

00:51:52.540 Let me explain

00:51:53.140 how.

00:51:53.940 So you can

00:51:54.420 imagine there

00:51:54.980 might be a

00:51:55.380 counter to

00:51:55.800 that.

00:51:56.980 But that's

00:51:57.480 the claim.

00:51:58.680 Somebody with

00:51:59.300 extensive knowledge

00:52:00.320 of those

00:52:00.720 specific machines

00:52:01.780 says that

00:52:02.840 exact problem

00:52:03.700 could not be

00:52:04.380 happening by

00:52:05.260 accident.

00:52:06.340 That that

00:52:06.780 could only

00:52:07.320 happen by a

00:52:08.080 human intervention

00:52:08.880 intentionally.

00:52:12.040 Now, of

00:52:12.880 course, this

00:52:13.480 is not proof.

00:52:14.880 This is just

00:52:15.600 the evidence

00:52:16.200 being offered

00:52:16.980 up.

00:52:17.900 But here's

00:52:18.760 what's interesting.

00:52:19.520 Rich Barris,

00:52:20.880 who on Twitter

00:52:21.800 goes by the

00:52:22.760 People's

00:52:23.200 Pundit, and

00:52:23.920 he was very

00:52:24.380 involved in

00:52:25.020 the election

00:52:26.100 irregularity claims.

00:52:28.060 And he tweeted

00:52:28.560 this, and I

00:52:29.420 don't know if

00:52:29.780 you could have,

00:52:30.520 maybe you

00:52:30.960 couldn't have

00:52:31.240 done this a

00:52:32.020 year ago, but

00:52:32.960 he said the

00:52:33.340 2022 Arizona

00:52:35.040 midterm elections

00:52:35.960 were not

00:52:37.100 conducted

00:52:37.640 legitimately.

00:52:38.720 Now, keep in

00:52:39.160 mind he said

00:52:39.640 that on Twitter.

00:52:41.660 Could you say

00:52:42.460 that on Twitter

00:52:43.440 a year ago?

00:52:46.440 Could you?

00:52:47.000 I feel like

00:52:49.180 you would have

00:52:49.460 been kicked

00:52:49.800 off, right?

00:52:50.540 Kicked off

00:52:50.940 of Twitter.

00:52:51.920 But there it

00:52:52.380 is.

00:52:53.020 But then he

00:52:53.520 follows it up,

00:52:54.360 and I think

00:52:54.720 this gives it

00:52:55.560 a little extra

00:52:56.120 weight.

00:52:56.680 He says, I

00:52:57.500 have no

00:52:57.860 problem extending

00:52:58.740 invites to

00:52:59.580 publicly debate

00:53:01.500 me over the

00:53:02.160 fact.

00:53:03.120 All fake

00:53:03.700 gurus are

00:53:05.120 welcome to

00:53:05.620 apply.

00:53:06.880 A word of

00:53:07.500 caution.

00:53:08.060 This is from

00:53:08.580 Rich Barris.

00:53:09.740 He says, you're

00:53:10.360 not as smart as

00:53:11.060 you think you

00:53:11.600 are, and I'm

00:53:12.200 going to

00:53:12.540 embarrass you.

00:53:13.180 That's a

00:53:16.620 pretty gutsy

00:53:17.760 claim, isn't

00:53:18.540 it?

00:53:19.160 Now, how

00:53:20.060 long have I

00:53:20.620 been saying

00:53:21.660 we need some

00:53:22.680 kind of a

00:53:23.480 national level

00:53:25.200 debate show,

00:53:27.100 a podcast or

00:53:28.040 live stream,

00:53:29.020 where outside of

00:53:30.660 the government

00:53:31.140 we can actually

00:53:32.660 have a real

00:53:33.280 debate without

00:53:34.720 weird time

00:53:35.420 limits where

00:53:36.040 people just

00:53:36.620 talk until

00:53:37.680 the time's

00:53:38.080 up, and

00:53:38.860 have actually

00:53:39.460 maybe people

00:53:40.620 fact-checking,

00:53:41.860 like a real

00:53:42.540 debate.

00:53:43.440 Where the

00:53:43.880 point of it

00:53:44.300 is not to

00:53:44.720 win the

00:53:45.080 debate, the

00:53:46.460 point of it

00:53:46.940 is to find

00:53:47.420 out what's

00:53:47.780 true, which

00:53:49.100 would look

00:53:49.500 different than

00:53:49.980 a debate.

00:53:50.700 Debates are

00:53:51.320 artificial contests

00:53:52.540 that are not

00:53:53.680 designed to

00:53:55.240 tell you what's

00:53:55.720 true.

00:53:56.760 It's an

00:53:57.320 artificial contest.

00:53:58.900 What you want

00:53:59.480 is something to

00:54:00.020 help you know

00:54:00.600 what's true.

00:54:01.580 So the debate

00:54:02.320 would be sort

00:54:03.460 of the surface

00:54:04.000 level, but

00:54:05.340 below that you

00:54:06.040 need to have

00:54:06.460 the experts and

00:54:07.380 researchers sitting

00:54:08.240 right there at

00:54:09.080 the same time,

00:54:10.340 and then when

00:54:10.840 somebody makes a

00:54:11.500 claim, they

00:54:12.520 also are

00:54:12.900 clacking away

00:54:13.480 on their

00:54:13.760 laptops, and

00:54:15.000 then they

00:54:15.300 go, okay, you

00:54:16.420 made this

00:54:16.840 following claim.

00:54:18.140 Here's a study

00:54:18.820 that backs you.

00:54:20.120 Here's a study

00:54:20.740 that debunks

00:54:21.920 you.

00:54:22.840 Here's what's

00:54:23.440 good and bad

00:54:23.920 about those two

00:54:24.600 studies.

00:54:25.960 Then we know

00:54:26.680 something.

00:54:28.900 Then we would

00:54:29.780 know something.

00:54:31.920 But the people

00:54:32.480 I don't want to

00:54:33.140 see debate, or

00:54:33.900 I just saw

00:54:34.400 Newt Gingrich and

00:54:36.520 Ann Coulter did

00:54:37.700 some debate

00:54:38.360 against some

00:54:39.240 Democrats.

00:54:40.460 I don't want to

00:54:41.000 see that.

00:54:42.340 Because as soon

00:54:42.880 as you put Newt

00:54:43.480 Gingrich or Ann

00:54:44.160 Coulter, it's all

00:54:45.340 about them.

00:54:47.120 It's no longer

00:54:48.020 about the issue,

00:54:48.700 it's about those

00:54:49.220 two people.

00:54:50.160 You can't have

00:54:50.760 that kind of

00:54:51.340 person trying to

00:54:53.060 tell you what's

00:54:53.600 true, because

00:54:54.640 they're too

00:54:55.580 identifiable with

00:54:57.400 a position.

00:54:58.580 You want somebody

00:54:59.380 who looks like

00:54:59.980 they don't care

00:55:00.600 which way it

00:55:01.100 ends up.

00:55:02.180 Someone who

00:55:02.980 legitimately says,

00:55:04.280 you know, I'm

00:55:05.200 just following the

00:55:05.800 facts.

00:55:06.160 So wherever

00:55:07.080 this lands, it

00:55:07.860 lands, and then

00:55:08.960 we'll deal with

00:55:09.540 it, because I

00:55:09.920 just want what's

00:55:10.540 good for the

00:55:10.960 country.

00:55:11.640 You want people

00:55:12.180 like that.

00:55:13.400 People who can

00:55:13.880 actually change

00:55:14.520 their mind in

00:55:15.040 public.

00:55:16.120 You want somebody

00:55:16.900 who's so

00:55:17.420 intellectually honest

00:55:18.660 that if they

00:55:19.700 lost a debate

00:55:20.600 in public, they

00:55:21.920 would say it.

00:55:23.420 Like right in

00:55:24.220 front of you.

00:55:25.740 That would be a

00:55:26.640 rare person.

00:55:28.080 A very rare

00:55:28.920 person.

00:55:29.500 Oh yeah, you

00:55:30.040 just, basically

00:55:31.080 you just wiped

00:55:32.200 the floor with

00:55:33.240 me.

00:55:33.860 Yeah, you won

00:55:34.360 that debate.

00:55:35.480 Yep, that

00:55:36.040 point you

00:55:36.380 made, I

00:55:36.760 had not

00:55:37.040 considered, and

00:55:37.700 that changes

00:55:38.480 my mind.

00:55:39.900 Surely there

00:55:40.700 are some

00:55:41.080 people like

00:55:41.560 that somewhere

00:55:42.120 in the world.

00:55:42.780 It would be

00:55:43.020 good to see

00:55:43.440 them debate.

00:55:45.240 So I

00:55:46.920 would like

00:55:49.200 to boost

00:55:50.280 Rich Baris'

00:55:51.300 offer, and I

00:55:53.840 do think he

00:55:54.360 knows enough

00:55:54.820 that he would

00:55:55.060 be a good

00:55:55.660 person to

00:55:56.480 have the

00:55:56.960 debate.

00:55:57.700 Now I

00:55:58.020 don't know

00:55:58.380 him personally,

00:55:59.920 but what I've

00:56:01.320 been following

00:56:01.940 suggests that

00:56:02.760 he's fact-based.

00:56:03.760 so fact-based

00:56:05.900 that I

00:56:06.340 could imagine,

00:56:07.620 I don't

00:56:07.940 know it, but

00:56:08.620 I could

00:56:09.480 imagine that

00:56:11.460 if he were in

00:56:12.060 a debate and

00:56:12.640 he lost, that

00:56:14.300 he might

00:56:14.580 actually just

00:56:15.020 say it.

00:56:15.900 Oh yeah, did

00:56:17.180 my best, these

00:56:18.640 claims look like

00:56:19.480 they were pretty

00:56:20.560 suspicious, but

00:56:21.420 now your argument

00:56:22.240 makes sense, and

00:56:23.060 I accept that.

00:56:24.640 I think he

00:56:25.220 could do it.

00:56:26.360 Now, that's

00:56:27.540 pretty optimistic,

00:56:28.640 isn't it?

00:56:30.160 Do you

00:56:30.620 think I

00:56:30.940 could do

00:56:31.220 it?

00:56:32.320 Do you

00:56:32.800 think I

00:56:33.140 could be in

00:56:33.720 a debate in

00:56:34.260 which I was

00:56:34.620 really strongly

00:56:35.360 held a

00:56:35.780 position, but

00:56:37.040 in the course

00:56:37.620 of the debate

00:56:38.260 in public, could

00:56:40.040 I change my

00:56:40.700 mind if I

00:56:41.460 got undebated?

00:56:42.660 Yes, I

00:56:43.060 could.

00:56:43.880 Yes, I

00:56:44.400 could do

00:56:44.620 that.

00:56:45.640 Yep.

00:56:46.780 I could do

00:56:47.420 that right in

00:56:47.960 front of you.

00:56:48.900 And the

00:56:49.360 reason I

00:56:49.740 could do

00:56:50.000 it is I've

00:56:50.480 created a

00:56:51.340 brand that

00:56:53.040 allows it.

00:56:54.440 So I

00:56:55.040 would not be

00:56:55.660 going counter to

00:56:58.400 my self-image

00:56:59.260 or the image

00:56:59.920 that you have

00:57:00.480 of me if I

00:57:01.540 changed my

00:57:02.120 mind in

00:57:02.560 public.

00:57:03.400 In fact, that

00:57:03.980 would be on

00:57:04.540 brand, wouldn't

00:57:05.500 it?

00:57:06.340 For me, that

00:57:06.900 would be totally

00:57:07.420 on brand.

00:57:09.040 Alan Dershowitz,

00:57:10.040 same thing.

00:57:10.720 I just saw his

00:57:11.240 name in the

00:57:11.680 comments.

00:57:12.420 If Alan

00:57:12.860 Dershowitz did

00:57:13.700 a public

00:57:14.120 debate and

00:57:15.540 somebody bested

00:57:16.520 him in the

00:57:17.020 debate, I

00:57:18.880 believe he

00:57:19.600 would say it.

00:57:21.080 And he would

00:57:21.480 say it before

00:57:21.920 the debate was

00:57:22.760 over.

00:57:23.600 I think he'd

00:57:24.080 say, you know

00:57:24.440 what?

00:57:25.060 I came here

00:57:25.820 honestly thinking

00:57:26.800 I had the

00:57:27.280 stronger argument.

00:57:28.680 After 60

00:57:29.620 minutes of

00:57:30.060 hearing the

00:57:30.380 other side, I

00:57:31.000 actually changed

00:57:31.580 my mind.

00:57:32.500 And I think

00:57:32.860 you should

00:57:33.180 consider that

00:57:34.180 that was a

00:57:36.000 superior argument.

00:57:38.560 Dershowitz could

00:57:39.220 say that.

00:57:39.840 Do you know

00:57:40.140 why?

00:57:41.700 Because he's

00:57:43.000 created a brand

00:57:43.760 for himself where

00:57:44.560 that's allowed.

00:57:46.260 Geraldo could do

00:57:46.920 it too.

00:57:47.860 Geraldo could do

00:57:48.580 that because he

00:57:49.500 also has a

00:57:50.020 brand where he

00:57:51.460 can say, oh,

00:57:52.880 I'm going to

00:57:53.620 follow the

00:57:54.120 information.

00:57:55.940 Yeah.

00:57:56.040 But do you

00:57:57.720 notice how few

00:57:58.460 people you

00:57:59.000 could come

00:57:59.760 up with that

00:58:01.380 you would trust

00:58:02.120 could change

00:58:03.040 their mind right

00:58:04.720 in front of

00:58:05.140 you?

00:58:05.820 Very, very

00:58:06.620 small number of

00:58:07.340 people.

00:58:08.100 And the only

00:58:08.540 reason they

00:58:09.020 could is because

00:58:10.720 they've created

00:58:11.660 the brand

00:58:12.900 expectation that

00:58:14.080 there are people

00:58:14.520 who can follow

00:58:15.180 the data wherever

00:58:16.400 it goes.

00:58:17.400 Even at the risk

00:58:19.020 of embarrassment

00:58:19.660 and even at

00:58:20.840 the risk of

00:58:21.640 personal whatever.

00:58:24.620 I see Victor

00:58:25.520 David Hansen

00:58:26.300 being mentioned.

00:58:27.520 I'm going to

00:58:27.980 question that

00:58:28.620 one, not

00:58:29.760 because of

00:58:30.920 any criticism

00:58:31.720 of him, but

00:58:33.100 because I'm

00:58:33.640 not aware of

00:58:34.460 anything he's

00:58:36.380 done that's

00:58:36.840 counter to,

00:58:38.000 let's say,

00:58:40.720 the rights

00:58:41.140 narrative.

00:58:42.380 If he has

00:58:43.200 that background,

00:58:45.600 then yes,

00:58:46.380 you would add

00:58:46.820 him to the

00:58:47.200 list.

00:58:48.200 But I'm not

00:58:48.820 aware of it.

00:58:49.660 Tim Poole,

00:58:54.420 somebody

00:58:54.780 suggests, maybe.

00:58:56.020 I don't know.

00:59:02.720 Offer to

00:59:03.360 debate Trump

00:59:03.900 on persuasion.

00:59:05.040 Well, I don't

00:59:05.700 think he and

00:59:06.160 I would debate

00:59:06.720 anything.

00:59:08.420 You know,

00:59:08.900 Greenwald is

00:59:09.780 now,

00:59:11.860 Greenwald may

00:59:12.740 have passed

00:59:13.400 too far into

00:59:14.440 the right

00:59:16.540 leaning part

00:59:17.700 of the world.

00:59:18.200 it's been a

00:59:20.480 long time

00:59:20.960 since I saw

00:59:21.540 Greenwald

00:59:22.100 disagree with

00:59:23.120 the right.

00:59:24.960 It's been a

00:59:25.680 long time.

00:59:28.040 And while I

00:59:29.380 have ultimate

00:59:30.460 respect for

00:59:31.980 Greenwald's

00:59:32.660 reporting, even

00:59:33.440 though I don't

00:59:33.840 like him

00:59:34.180 personally,

00:59:34.820 which I think

00:59:36.580 is important

00:59:37.040 to say,

00:59:37.880 because I think

00:59:38.600 that helps my

00:59:39.320 credibility,

00:59:40.240 I don't like

00:59:40.920 Greenwald

00:59:41.280 personally,

00:59:42.480 because he

00:59:42.940 once tried to

00:59:44.660 slap me down

00:59:45.280 on Twitter,

00:59:46.080 and I

00:59:46.600 didn't think

00:59:47.200 it was a

00:59:47.700 legitimate.

00:59:48.880 So I just

00:59:49.760 have a personal

00:59:50.320 grudge against

00:59:51.020 him, because

00:59:52.140 he's basically

00:59:52.920 a dick.

00:59:54.380 But the work

00:59:55.360 that he does,

00:59:56.120 I think is so

00:59:57.080 valuable for the

00:59:57.900 country, that I

00:59:59.480 have ultimate

01:00:00.440 respect for his

01:00:01.380 professional work.

01:00:03.240 He just might be

01:00:04.000 sort of a dick.

01:00:05.400 But I'm pretty

01:00:06.940 sure that's

01:00:09.400 common to a lot

01:00:10.140 of people.

01:00:11.220 Maybe even me.

01:00:12.080 Maybe even

01:00:13.820 me.

01:00:20.220 Why do you

01:00:20.800 believe the

01:00:21.140 assessment of

01:00:21.640 who, they're

01:00:23.980 all subjective?

01:00:25.720 Well, it's not a

01:00:26.620 question of who

01:00:27.180 I'd believe.

01:00:28.680 It's a question

01:00:29.540 of, are there

01:00:30.760 some people that

01:00:32.520 you know could

01:00:33.980 change their

01:00:34.600 opinion in front

01:00:35.480 of you?

01:00:36.820 And I think

01:00:37.500 there are some

01:00:37.860 people that you

01:00:38.400 could know that

01:00:38.920 with some

01:00:39.260 certainty, and

01:00:40.300 I'm one of

01:00:40.760 them.

01:00:41.460 And I think

01:00:41.860 Dershowitz is

01:00:42.500 another.

01:00:43.700 You know, when

01:00:44.200 you say Tim

01:00:44.800 Poole, you're

01:00:45.740 starting to get

01:00:46.380 into, I don't

01:00:46.920 know, I would

01:00:48.420 like to think

01:00:48.980 you would.

01:00:50.000 Like, I have a

01:00:50.600 general positive

01:00:51.280 feeling about

01:00:51.900 Tim Poole, so I

01:00:53.220 think maybe you

01:00:53.760 would.

01:00:54.520 But I think that

01:00:55.260 Dershowitz is a

01:00:56.100 guarantee, and I

01:00:57.900 think I'm a

01:00:58.360 guarantee, because

01:01:00.040 we've both done

01:01:00.680 it.

01:01:01.000 We've both done

01:01:01.580 it in public.

01:01:04.220 Tucker changed

01:01:04.860 on the rack.

01:01:05.520 Yeah, years

01:01:06.180 later.

01:01:07.300 Years later.

01:01:08.220 You know, that's

01:01:09.200 an interesting one.

01:01:09.940 Could Tucker

01:01:11.040 change his

01:01:11.660 mind in real

01:01:13.060 time?

01:01:13.500 He changed his

01:01:14.140 mind in Iraq, but

01:01:15.720 that seemed to be

01:01:16.300 after the fact.

01:01:19.900 Could Joe

01:01:20.720 Rogan?

01:01:21.640 Joe Rogan

01:01:22.260 could.

01:01:23.300 Yeah, Joe

01:01:23.720 Rogan could.

01:01:24.620 Could Russell

01:01:25.320 Brand?

01:01:26.000 Yes.

01:01:27.320 Could Steve

01:01:27.840 Crowder?

01:01:28.580 Hmm, there's an

01:01:29.500 interesting one.

01:01:31.160 I don't know.

01:01:32.480 I have no reason

01:01:33.400 to think he

01:01:33.940 couldn't, but

01:01:35.180 that's different

01:01:35.700 from saying there's

01:01:36.580 evidence to suggest

01:01:37.820 that he would.

01:01:40.360 That's a little

01:01:41.000 bit different.

01:01:41.840 Because there are

01:01:42.280 a number of

01:01:42.620 people I would

01:01:43.020 say, well, I

01:01:43.600 have no reason to

01:01:44.320 think they

01:01:44.660 wouldn't change

01:01:45.420 their mind, but

01:01:46.480 they don't have

01:01:46.880 any history of

01:01:47.600 it that I'm

01:01:48.920 aware of.

01:01:50.500 How about

01:01:51.040 Jon Stewart?

01:01:52.540 Yeah.

01:01:53.860 Yep, he could.

01:01:54.920 Jon Stewart

01:01:55.420 could.

01:01:56.740 Tulsi could, of

01:01:57.660 course.

01:02:00.080 Yeah.

01:02:00.620 Isn't it

01:02:01.040 interesting, though?

01:02:01.760 I feel like we

01:02:02.500 need almost a

01:02:04.260 separate category

01:02:05.460 for people who

01:02:07.400 could change

01:02:12.420 their mind.

01:02:14.580 Doesn't it seem

01:02:15.420 like that's

01:02:15.840 something useful?

01:02:18.240 Because if you

01:02:19.080 listen to people

01:02:19.920 who can't change

01:02:20.620 their mind, what

01:02:21.260 are you listening

01:02:21.720 to?

01:02:22.560 You're not

01:02:23.060 listening to

01:02:23.580 anything useful.

01:02:25.300 You're listening

01:02:25.780 to propaganda.

01:02:28.360 Yeah, the

01:02:29.040 Weinsteins, two

01:02:30.540 good examples.

01:02:32.140 The Weinsteins

01:02:32.760 based on, I

01:02:34.380 believe, just

01:02:35.060 intellectual

01:02:36.220 honesty.

01:02:38.240 I think they

01:02:38.880 just have a

01:02:39.320 higher principle

01:02:40.880 for intellectual

01:02:41.620 honesty, so I

01:02:42.340 think they

01:02:42.600 would go

01:02:42.900 wherever the

01:02:43.480 data went.

01:02:47.260 That's my

01:02:47.920 impression.

01:02:50.500 Dr. Drew,

01:02:51.480 same thing.

01:02:52.160 Dr. Drew,

01:02:52.880 he has a

01:02:54.880 history of

01:02:55.840 being able to

01:02:56.500 take a hit

01:02:57.400 by not saying

01:02:58.940 the popular

01:02:59.660 thing.

01:03:00.580 So he's got

01:03:01.080 a long history

01:03:01.680 of going where

01:03:03.260 he feels the

01:03:04.060 data is going.

01:03:04.900 So that's a

01:03:05.320 good one.

01:03:10.240 Yeah.

01:03:11.220 All right.

01:03:11.620 Well, I

01:03:12.760 don't want to

01:03:13.240 mention too

01:03:14.560 many names.

01:03:17.080 And I see

01:03:18.000 all of you

01:03:18.540 clankers.

01:03:19.740 I do see

01:03:20.420 your comments.

01:03:22.100 It's just not

01:03:22.860 something I want

01:03:23.440 to interact

01:03:23.860 with.

01:03:26.740 All right.

01:03:27.700 So, but I

01:03:29.560 do see your

01:03:29.960 comments.

01:03:30.300 So if you

01:03:31.440 thought you

01:03:31.800 weren't being

01:03:32.220 seen, I

01:03:32.920 can tell you

01:03:34.280 that you

01:03:34.600 are being

01:03:34.920 seen.

01:03:37.320 All right.

01:03:39.860 Then Carrie

01:03:40.680 Lake responded

01:03:42.020 to Rich

01:03:42.720 Barris saying

01:03:43.260 he wanted to

01:03:43.820 do a public

01:03:44.440 debate.

01:03:45.380 She said,

01:03:45.960 I'd pay to

01:03:46.400 watch this

01:03:46.860 debate.

01:03:48.800 Now, isn't

01:03:51.700 that the

01:03:52.720 thing?

01:03:55.840 I would pay

01:03:56.800 to watch

01:03:57.280 this debate.

01:03:57.980 I would

01:03:58.100 pay to watch

01:03:59.160 this debate.

01:04:00.300 I would

01:04:01.180 pay to watch

01:04:01.680 that debate.

01:04:04.440 I would

01:04:05.040 pay actual

01:04:05.660 money, 10

01:04:08.100 bucks.

01:04:09.760 But I

01:04:10.300 definitely pay

01:04:10.800 a dollar.

01:04:13.120 You don't

01:04:13.900 think there's

01:04:14.280 any podcaster

01:04:15.180 who's willing

01:04:16.420 to host a

01:04:17.080 debate that

01:04:18.720 people, probably

01:04:19.540 a million people

01:04:20.320 would pay a

01:04:20.780 dollar for.

01:04:22.080 To do, you

01:04:22.920 know, two

01:04:23.220 hours of work

01:04:23.880 and you make

01:04:24.300 a million

01:04:24.640 dollars.

01:04:25.100 somebody's

01:04:30.000 saying that

01:04:30.500 sticks and

01:04:31.080 hammer clarified

01:04:31.900 within 48

01:04:33.040 hours so I

01:04:33.700 should unblock

01:04:34.380 him.

01:04:37.660 What's the

01:04:38.340 clarification

01:04:39.340 could there

01:04:40.080 be?

01:04:41.020 If I think

01:04:41.840 he's a

01:04:42.200 dick, how

01:04:44.020 do you

01:04:44.280 clarify that?

01:04:46.360 I don't know.

01:04:47.040 I'm not

01:04:49.020 interested.

01:04:52.040 He didn't

01:04:52.700 mean to

01:04:53.060 insult me.

01:04:54.380 No, he

01:04:54.740 meant to be

01:04:55.260 condescending.

01:04:58.060 He wrote

01:04:58.900 something which

01:04:59.900 was clearly

01:05:00.480 intended to be

01:05:01.280 condescending.

01:05:01.880 Yeah, it

01:05:07.980 takes one to

01:05:08.460 know one.

01:05:09.040 Yeah, that's

01:05:10.680 true.

01:05:11.560 It takes one to

01:05:12.460 know one.

01:05:14.140 All right.

01:05:15.180 No, so

01:05:15.860 here's the

01:05:16.220 thing.

01:05:17.120 It wasn't his

01:05:17.940 first offense

01:05:18.680 and when

01:05:21.640 people speak

01:05:22.880 to me in a

01:05:23.480 condescending

01:05:24.080 way, I

01:05:25.440 have a right

01:05:25.980 to take

01:05:27.620 them out of

01:05:28.080 my attention

01:05:29.980 span forever.

01:05:31.880 It doesn't

01:05:33.080 matter to me

01:05:33.600 that he

01:05:34.400 doesn't like

01:05:34.980 it.

01:05:35.840 That's not

01:05:36.200 really.

01:05:37.560 Be a man.

01:05:39.440 Be a man.

01:05:41.060 All right,

01:05:41.320 here's a good

01:05:41.660 question.

01:05:43.420 Is it more

01:05:43.960 manly just to

01:05:44.700 make your

01:05:45.040 decision and

01:05:45.640 move on?

01:05:46.800 Or is it

01:05:47.580 more manly to

01:05:48.360 keep revisiting

01:05:49.300 your decision?

01:05:50.720 Which is

01:05:51.140 more manly?

01:05:53.320 I don't think

01:05:54.140 anything's more

01:05:54.700 manly.

01:05:58.440 Let me give

01:05:59.800 you a little

01:06:00.100 micro lesson

01:06:00.800 about something.

01:06:01.620 I think that

01:06:02.160 maybe this

01:06:03.240 applies.

01:06:05.600 How many

01:06:06.300 of you have

01:06:07.140 the following

01:06:07.760 philosophy of

01:06:08.600 life?

01:06:09.680 And I'll

01:06:10.060 give you the

01:06:10.600 alternative.

01:06:11.800 The first

01:06:12.380 philosophy is

01:06:13.100 once you've

01:06:13.640 made a

01:06:13.960 decision,

01:06:14.900 you just

01:06:15.940 move on.

01:06:17.580 And there

01:06:18.040 are other

01:06:18.240 people who

01:06:18.580 make a

01:06:18.880 decision,

01:06:19.380 but it's

01:06:19.580 never really

01:06:20.100 made.

01:06:20.860 It's always

01:06:21.340 revisited

01:06:22.020 forever.

01:06:23.300 Maybe,

01:06:23.920 maybe,

01:06:24.520 maybe,

01:06:24.800 maybe,

01:06:25.380 right?

01:06:28.020 I take the

01:06:29.300 decision and

01:06:30.120 move on.

01:06:31.400 And then

01:06:31.780 when somebody

01:06:32.240 says you

01:06:32.620 made a

01:06:32.980 wrong decision

01:06:33.840 and here's

01:06:34.320 why,

01:06:35.500 even if I

01:06:36.200 believe them,

01:06:37.480 I move on

01:06:38.140 anyway.

01:06:39.980 I move on

01:06:40.900 anyway.

01:06:41.380 And that's

01:06:41.860 really hard to

01:06:42.720 explain.

01:06:45.140 Other people

01:06:45.800 do.

01:06:46.120 And I'm not

01:06:46.740 even sure if

01:06:47.280 it's rational.

01:06:48.660 it's just

01:06:50.640 that my

01:06:51.000 experience of

01:06:51.720 life is

01:06:52.820 that moving

01:06:53.340 forward is

01:06:54.300 always better

01:06:54.780 than not.

01:06:56.580 And that as

01:06:57.320 soon as you're

01:06:57.840 in your

01:06:58.320 analysis paralysis,

01:07:00.160 that's all

01:07:00.860 bad.

01:07:01.680 But moving

01:07:02.320 forward the

01:07:02.960 wrong way can

01:07:04.520 at least help

01:07:05.120 you adjust.

01:07:06.040 You know,

01:07:06.260 if you run

01:07:06.720 into a wall,

01:07:07.380 you adjust.

01:07:08.280 But I

01:07:08.700 always say,

01:07:09.980 okay,

01:07:10.220 we're done

01:07:10.600 with that

01:07:10.900 decision.

01:07:11.800 And it's

01:07:12.360 really hard if

01:07:13.440 you're making

01:07:14.220 decisions with

01:07:15.100 women,

01:07:16.040 like a

01:07:16.440 partner.

01:07:16.780 because women

01:07:18.560 will often

01:07:19.020 say accurately,

01:07:20.560 oh, new

01:07:21.280 information has

01:07:22.100 emerged, let's

01:07:23.740 go re-look at

01:07:24.840 this decision.

01:07:26.160 And then I

01:07:26.700 say, I don't

01:07:27.620 go backwards.

01:07:29.580 I'm going to

01:07:30.160 make a new

01:07:30.640 problem with my

01:07:31.480 new decision and

01:07:32.240 then I'll fix

01:07:32.680 that because

01:07:33.880 that's in the

01:07:34.340 future.

01:07:35.440 But I'm not

01:07:36.040 going to go

01:07:36.340 back.

01:07:37.160 I just don't

01:07:37.680 go backwards.

01:07:39.040 And boy,

01:07:39.800 this is a

01:07:40.880 relationship

01:07:41.480 killer, let me

01:07:42.360 tell you.

01:07:43.220 I don't

01:07:43.880 recommend it to

01:07:44.600 you at all.

01:07:45.560 It's a total

01:07:46.160 relationship

01:07:46.720 killer.

01:07:47.500 Because try to

01:07:48.060 explain to

01:07:48.560 somebody you

01:07:49.020 shouldn't do

01:07:49.440 something that's

01:07:50.020 obviously right.

01:07:51.840 Well, you

01:07:52.200 obviously made the

01:07:53.120 wrong decision

01:07:53.740 based on this

01:07:54.520 new information.

01:07:55.800 Why in the

01:07:56.340 world wouldn't

01:07:56.820 you go back

01:07:57.320 and rethink

01:07:57.720 it?

01:07:58.980 Because I

01:08:00.760 don't go

01:08:01.080 backwards.

01:08:02.460 I just don't

01:08:03.220 go backwards.

01:08:04.440 I'll go fix

01:08:05.120 the new thing

01:08:05.780 that I made

01:08:06.660 worse, but I'm

01:08:07.860 not going to

01:08:08.180 go backwards.

01:08:10.420 Is that a

01:08:11.480 good way to

01:08:11.980 be?

01:08:12.200 I don't

01:08:12.400 know.

01:08:13.180 I really

01:08:13.540 don't know.

01:08:15.120 You took a

01:08:15.920 massive L

01:08:16.660 for what?

01:08:25.980 Sounds like

01:08:29.360 an excuse.

01:08:32.260 I wonder if we'll

01:08:33.260 ever find the

01:08:33.960 real story about

01:08:34.760 the hammer and

01:08:35.480 Pelosi.

01:08:35.840 I think we do

01:08:38.060 know the real

01:08:38.580 story about that.

01:08:40.340 Pelosi.

01:08:40.660 The part that

01:08:42.300 everybody's confused

01:08:43.240 about is not

01:08:44.080 confusing at all

01:08:45.040 because they say

01:08:46.680 that Pelosi

01:08:47.540 answered the

01:08:48.780 door and

01:08:50.860 the police

01:08:51.820 didn't see any

01:08:52.660 immediate problems

01:08:53.620 and that

01:08:55.320 Pelosi let

01:08:57.760 them in and

01:08:59.260 it was only

01:08:59.760 then that the

01:09:00.540 bad guy grabbed

01:09:01.220 the hammer and

01:09:02.400 hit Pelosi.

01:09:04.100 But isn't it

01:09:06.140 obvious exactly

01:09:07.380 what happened?

01:09:07.940 Pelosi was

01:09:10.280 engaging the

01:09:11.000 crazy guy in

01:09:11.680 conversation to

01:09:13.240 stall and to

01:09:15.160 keep it as

01:09:16.160 nonviolent as

01:09:17.220 possible.

01:09:18.000 He had the

01:09:18.500 hammer in his

01:09:19.140 hand just in

01:09:19.940 case, but he

01:09:21.220 was clearly

01:09:21.740 talking to the

01:09:22.500 crazy guy like a

01:09:23.420 friend and he

01:09:24.940 wanted to

01:09:25.360 maintain that

01:09:26.220 feel to keep

01:09:28.500 the violence

01:09:29.100 low.

01:09:29.680 So when the

01:09:30.300 police entered,

01:09:31.500 he said, you

01:09:32.060 know, my

01:09:32.340 friend here,

01:09:34.140 you know, here's

01:09:34.740 my friend because

01:09:35.440 they've been

01:09:35.760 talking for a

01:09:36.380 while now, so

01:09:37.840 he wanted to

01:09:38.880 present him as

01:09:39.460 a friend to

01:09:40.100 keep the

01:09:40.440 violence down.

01:09:41.580 Here's my

01:09:41.960 friend.

01:09:43.240 And then when

01:09:44.140 the crazy guy

01:09:45.520 realized that he

01:09:46.540 was going to be

01:09:47.020 in trouble and

01:09:48.360 that this was an

01:09:49.080 arrest, not just

01:09:49.840 a conversation, he

01:09:51.300 went nuts on

01:09:51.980 Pelosi for

01:09:52.620 calling the

01:09:53.320 police.

01:09:54.440 How is that

01:09:54.880 not obvious?

01:09:57.520 Now, I'm not

01:09:58.240 saying it's the

01:09:58.840 true story because

01:10:00.360 anything could

01:10:01.160 sound right and

01:10:02.000 not be true, but

01:10:03.600 it's the most

01:10:04.360 obvious explanation.

01:10:05.600 why would you

01:10:06.620 reject the

01:10:07.400 obvious explanation?

01:10:11.060 Yeah, that's

01:10:11.980 the obvious

01:10:12.340 explanation.

01:10:13.160 If there's more

01:10:13.920 to it, well,

01:10:15.520 that's the world

01:10:16.620 we live in.

01:10:17.300 We wouldn't be

01:10:17.780 that surprised.

01:10:22.580 Why do I have

01:10:23.360 so many clankers

01:10:24.220 here?

01:10:24.720 Is it because

01:10:25.140 you're all mad

01:10:25.740 that I blocked

01:10:27.300 Stix and Hammer?

01:10:29.860 So the

01:10:30.560 clankers are

01:10:31.680 fans of

01:10:33.320 Stix and Hammer

01:10:33.960 who I blocked

01:10:34.980 the other day

01:10:35.460 for being a

01:10:36.020 dick.

01:10:37.540 And I think

01:10:38.080 that can we

01:10:41.140 all agree that

01:10:41.720 it doesn't

01:10:42.120 matter?

01:10:43.460 Does anybody

01:10:43.940 care who I

01:10:44.600 block on

01:10:45.040 Twitter?

01:10:46.600 And for what

01:10:47.340 reason?

01:10:48.100 Because they're

01:10:48.460 personal reasons.

01:10:50.320 I'm not trying to

01:10:51.500 say that you

01:10:52.100 should block

01:10:52.560 him.

01:10:54.060 It was just a

01:10:54.620 personal decision.

01:10:56.260 It was a very

01:10:56.960 personal decision.

01:10:57.820 It has nothing to

01:10:58.380 do with politics,

01:10:59.500 nothing to do with

01:11:00.480 his opinion.

01:11:02.120 It was just

01:11:02.540 personal.

01:11:02.820 All right.

01:11:07.560 That, ladies

01:11:08.220 and gentlemen,

01:11:08.980 brings us to

01:11:09.580 the conclusion

01:11:10.160 of the best

01:11:10.820 live stream

01:11:11.440 you've ever

01:11:12.000 seen in your

01:11:12.480 life.

01:11:15.280 I got less

01:11:16.040 pushback than

01:11:16.660 I was expecting.

01:11:17.580 I thought I'd

01:11:17.980 get a lot more

01:11:18.400 pushback on

01:11:18.980 this one.

01:11:25.260 All right.

01:11:26.960 Narcissists.

01:11:28.720 Absolutely.

01:11:29.080 Oh, you just

01:11:31.760 reminded me.

01:11:34.620 So I responded,

01:11:35.880 Dr. Jordan

01:11:36.920 Peterson responded

01:11:37.760 to one of my

01:11:38.580 tweets, and he

01:11:40.360 was talking about

01:11:41.440 anonymity on

01:11:42.740 Twitter.

01:11:43.960 And he asked

01:11:45.260 some interesting

01:11:45.960 questions about

01:11:46.700 the anonymous

01:11:47.260 people, whether

01:11:48.820 they're good or

01:11:49.440 bad in general.

01:11:51.100 But Peterson

01:11:52.580 noted in his

01:11:53.880 response to me

01:11:54.620 that there's

01:11:56.880 research that

01:11:58.100 shows that these

01:11:58.960 anonymous social

01:12:00.260 media users are

01:12:02.320 high in the

01:12:02.980 dark triad

01:12:03.960 narcissist

01:12:05.040 personality traits.

01:12:07.140 So you've

01:12:07.880 really created

01:12:08.680 an attractor for

01:12:11.200 the worst people

01:12:11.960 in society, and

01:12:13.680 it attracted them

01:12:14.500 just like it

01:12:15.300 should have, and

01:12:16.340 then they're

01:12:16.620 acting exactly like

01:12:17.680 you'd expect the

01:12:18.460 worst people to

01:12:19.020 act.

01:12:20.200 Now, I

01:12:20.880 responded to him.

01:12:21.740 I don't know if he

01:12:22.540 responded to my

01:12:23.220 response.

01:12:23.700 I didn't see it,

01:12:24.560 anyone.

01:12:25.400 But I responded to

01:12:26.460 him because I

01:12:26.880 thought it was

01:12:27.240 funny that

01:12:28.800 Jordan Peterson

01:12:29.600 would be calling

01:12:30.340 anybody a

01:12:30.920 narcissist.

01:12:32.300 But I don't

01:12:33.240 put him in that

01:12:33.960 category without

01:12:34.700 myself.

01:12:36.220 So in my

01:12:36.700 response, I

01:12:37.800 noted that the

01:12:38.620 two of us were

01:12:39.320 both peacocks.

01:12:42.380 So it's hard to

01:12:43.440 say that the

01:12:44.080 anonymous people

01:12:45.040 are narcissists

01:12:46.220 when the people

01:12:47.280 in the conversation

01:12:48.120 are Dr. Jordan

01:12:49.120 Peterson and

01:12:49.820 me.

01:12:51.220 Do you think

01:12:51.900 Dr. Jordan

01:12:52.720 Peterson and

01:12:53.680 me, do you

01:12:55.320 think the two

01:12:55.800 of us have

01:12:57.160 the right to

01:12:58.200 call somebody

01:12:58.840 else a

01:12:59.300 narcissist?

01:13:00.700 Of all the

01:13:01.520 two people in

01:13:02.120 the world, there

01:13:03.640 couldn't be two

01:13:04.880 more narcissistic

01:13:05.800 people than us.

01:13:07.360 We're the two

01:13:08.280 peacockiest peacocks

01:13:11.160 you've ever seen.

01:13:12.660 I mean, we're

01:13:13.140 all about public

01:13:14.100 attention for

01:13:16.300 presumably doing

01:13:17.620 good work.

01:13:18.680 At least that's

01:13:19.380 the attempt.

01:13:20.480 Now, I'm

01:13:22.680 quick to point

01:13:23.320 out, and I'm

01:13:24.460 sure Dr.

01:13:25.560 Peterson would

01:13:26.140 point out the

01:13:26.660 same, that

01:13:27.500 they're basically

01:13:28.720 two major

01:13:30.100 kinds of

01:13:30.660 narcissists, and

01:13:32.340 they're very

01:13:32.760 different.

01:13:34.320 One kind likes

01:13:35.820 to show off, but

01:13:38.040 the best way to

01:13:38.660 show off is to

01:13:39.300 actually do

01:13:39.780 something good.

01:13:41.400 Like, that's

01:13:41.900 how I play it.

01:13:42.780 Like, I don't

01:13:43.140 really, it

01:13:44.320 wouldn't feed me

01:13:45.100 to get credit

01:13:45.800 for something I

01:13:46.440 didn't do, because

01:13:47.660 actually that

01:13:48.160 happens fairly

01:13:48.920 often.

01:13:49.820 Fairly often

01:13:50.560 people will

01:13:51.040 say, oh, you

01:13:51.640 made this

01:13:52.400 prediction correctly.

01:13:53.260 And I'll

01:13:54.140 look at it

01:13:54.500 and go, no, I

01:13:55.760 didn't.

01:13:56.900 I never made

01:13:57.800 that prediction,

01:13:58.500 but thank you

01:13:59.500 for giving me

01:14:00.100 credit.

01:14:00.920 But it doesn't

01:14:01.540 do anything for

01:14:02.140 me.

01:14:03.420 Getting credit

01:14:04.260 for something I

01:14:04.940 didn't do happens

01:14:06.480 to me all the

01:14:07.060 time.

01:14:07.660 It's like a very

01:14:08.420 irregular occurrence.

01:14:09.760 But when it's

01:14:10.240 something I didn't

01:14:10.900 do, it gives me

01:14:11.740 nothing.

01:14:12.840 Like, there's no

01:14:13.600 dopamine hit, just

01:14:15.080 nothing.

01:14:16.040 It's like, oh,

01:14:16.780 that's weird.

01:14:17.540 But if I get

01:14:19.280 credit for

01:14:19.760 something I

01:14:20.260 actually did, that

01:14:22.140 helped a real

01:14:22.840 person, it feels

01:14:24.420 really good.

01:14:25.980 Yeah, I'm the

01:14:27.260 most narcissistic,

01:14:29.200 grandiose narcissist

01:14:30.120 you could ever

01:14:30.740 be.

01:14:31.340 But I think, you

01:14:32.700 know, my non-medically

01:14:34.540 trained brain says

01:14:36.800 that Peterson is

01:14:38.800 exactly like me, in

01:14:40.360 this one regard.

01:14:41.520 You know, unlike

01:14:42.560 the poor man's

01:14:43.640 version.

01:14:44.540 But in this one

01:14:45.340 regard, he

01:14:46.160 clearly, according

01:14:48.440 to my personal

01:14:50.100 impression, I

01:14:51.820 can't read his

01:14:52.380 mind, but it

01:14:53.600 appears that he

01:14:54.640 likes attention

01:14:56.180 for doing things

01:14:57.280 that are useful

01:14:57.840 and good for

01:14:58.380 people.

01:14:59.420 And why

01:14:59.860 wouldn't he?

01:15:01.240 Wouldn't you?

01:15:02.680 He just, he can

01:15:03.600 deliver, so he's

01:15:04.940 in that position

01:15:05.520 because he has the

01:15:06.080 ability to do it.

01:15:07.340 But if you had

01:15:08.000 the ability to do

01:15:08.820 it, wouldn't

01:15:10.160 you?

01:15:11.740 Wouldn't you?

01:15:13.420 If you could do

01:15:14.480 as much good as

01:15:15.540 he does,

01:15:16.800 wouldn't you do

01:15:17.440 it?

01:15:18.240 And wouldn't you

01:15:18.740 do it as publicly

01:15:19.680 as possible?

01:15:20.480 And wouldn't you

01:15:21.580 enjoy it if

01:15:22.220 somebody said,

01:15:22.820 hey, you did

01:15:23.280 something good

01:15:23.780 for me?

01:15:24.160 Of course you

01:15:24.580 would.

01:15:25.620 And my

01:15:26.320 understanding is

01:15:27.020 that makes us

01:15:27.520 both narcissists.

01:15:29.680 But that's a

01:15:31.240 different kind than

01:15:32.140 the dark triad

01:15:33.420 narcissist.

01:15:34.400 So the other

01:15:35.040 kind is almost

01:15:37.140 all bad.

01:15:38.500 No, it's all

01:15:39.000 bad.

01:15:39.540 Not almost.

01:15:40.300 It's just all

01:15:40.740 bad.

01:15:41.040 So you've

01:15:43.580 got to keep

01:15:43.900 your narcissist

01:15:44.460 straight.

01:15:45.960 And so I think

01:15:46.440 my comment was a

01:15:47.240 little unfair

01:15:47.740 because I was

01:15:48.780 conflating the two

01:15:49.800 kinds of narcissists.

01:15:51.500 But it still

01:15:52.080 struck me as

01:15:52.680 funny.

01:15:56.180 Who is more

01:15:56.700 powerful,

01:15:57.460 Carrie Lake or

01:15:58.260 Mike Sertovich?

01:16:00.120 Is that a fair

01:16:00.920 question?

01:16:01.900 Who is more

01:16:02.400 powerful?

01:16:04.480 What you mean is

01:16:05.320 who's more

01:16:05.700 persuasive, right?

01:16:06.600 who has better

01:16:08.000 persuasion

01:16:08.560 abilities?

01:16:10.540 I think they're

01:16:11.320 both tens.

01:16:12.920 I don't know.

01:16:14.020 They're probably

01:16:14.700 both tens.

01:16:16.720 Ten out of

01:16:17.460 ten.

01:16:19.720 All right.

01:16:26.160 Were you

01:16:27.000 bullied as a

01:16:27.720 child?

01:16:29.040 Me?

01:16:30.620 Who wasn't

01:16:31.780 bullied as a

01:16:32.380 child?

01:16:33.820 Is there

01:16:34.400 anybody who

01:16:34.860 wasn't bullied

01:16:35.620 as a child?

01:16:36.600 Is that even

01:16:37.420 a thing?

01:16:39.500 You?

01:16:40.420 Oh, yeah.

01:16:41.040 Somebody who's

01:16:41.480 really big.

01:16:42.240 If you're very

01:16:43.240 large and you're

01:16:44.000 male, maybe you

01:16:45.620 weren't bullied.

01:16:46.400 That's true.

01:16:47.680 But even then,

01:16:48.440 the older kids

01:16:49.080 would bully you.

01:16:52.360 You were not?

01:16:54.780 I had a few

01:16:55.620 bullies, but

01:16:56.220 things didn't

01:16:56.820 work out for

01:16:57.400 them.

01:17:01.300 Yeah.

01:17:02.160 So my

01:17:02.620 bully narrative

01:17:03.940 is that I had

01:17:05.360 a few, but

01:17:05.960 I solved them

01:17:08.100 both with

01:17:08.500 violence.

01:17:10.860 Violence

01:17:11.260 solves a lot

01:17:11.880 of problems.

01:17:14.540 Violence

01:17:14.940 is very

01:17:15.800 successful.

01:17:16.880 Yeah.

01:17:17.240 In the old

01:17:17.960 days, remember

01:17:18.520 the old way

01:17:20.540 that you were

01:17:21.780 taught to deal

01:17:22.340 with bullies

01:17:22.860 is to attack

01:17:24.240 them.

01:17:25.420 So I just

01:17:26.100 physically

01:17:26.540 attacked them

01:17:27.180 and hurt

01:17:28.600 them.

01:17:29.340 And then they

01:17:29.920 never bothered

01:17:30.420 me again.

01:17:30.800 But the

01:17:32.580 key to

01:17:33.180 attacking

01:17:33.560 a bully

01:17:33.900 is you

01:17:34.220 got to

01:17:34.400 make sure

01:17:34.720 that the

01:17:35.060 next time

01:17:35.480 they know

01:17:35.760 you're going

01:17:36.040 to kill

01:17:36.300 them.

01:17:37.700 You can't

01:17:38.900 just hurt

01:17:39.340 them, because

01:17:40.340 then they

01:17:40.620 might just

01:17:40.960 want to hurt

01:17:41.340 you back.

01:17:42.660 So you

01:17:43.100 have to hurt

01:17:43.620 them and

01:17:44.640 tell them

01:17:45.000 that's just

01:17:45.780 the appetizer.

01:17:47.380 Well, there's

01:17:47.780 the appetizer.

01:17:48.820 If you want

01:17:49.240 the full meal,

01:17:49.960 I'll come

01:17:50.240 back.

01:17:51.400 So if you

01:17:51.980 don't do

01:17:52.280 that part,

01:17:52.860 it doesn't

01:17:53.200 work.

01:17:53.580 So you

01:17:53.760 got to really

01:17:54.400 sell that

01:17:54.880 part hard.

01:17:55.340 So once

01:17:56.580 you have

01:17:56.860 them down

01:17:57.300 and you're

01:17:57.620 shoving grass

01:17:58.260 in their

01:17:58.540 mouth, that's

01:18:00.540 when you tell

01:18:00.960 them you'll

01:18:01.360 come back.

01:18:03.480 As I was

01:18:04.080 making one of

01:18:04.580 my bullies

01:18:05.060 eat grass in

01:18:05.760 front of the

01:18:06.140 rest of the

01:18:06.480 class, as I

01:18:07.960 was sitting on

01:18:08.440 his chest

01:18:08.860 shoving it

01:18:09.340 down his

01:18:09.680 throat, I

01:18:11.000 reminded him

01:18:13.500 that I would

01:18:13.840 come back.

01:18:17.820 No, Elon

01:18:18.420 mentions.

01:18:19.040 I did mention

01:18:19.600 him.

01:18:20.180 I mentioned

01:18:20.780 him in the

01:18:21.240 reference to

01:18:21.940 Yoel.

01:18:25.340 All right.

01:18:26.800 Ladies and

01:18:27.460 gentlemen.

01:18:29.900 Yeah, Fauci

01:18:30.540 just bores

01:18:31.120 me.

01:18:32.420 There's

01:18:32.860 nothing to

01:18:33.260 say about

01:18:33.620 Fauci except

01:18:34.460 he said

01:18:35.600 X.

01:18:36.820 We think

01:18:37.400 he lied.

01:18:38.540 You know,

01:18:38.800 just over

01:18:39.480 and over

01:18:39.800 again.

01:18:41.600 That's the

01:18:42.220 whole story

01:18:42.700 of Fauci.

01:18:43.540 He said

01:18:44.160 something.

01:18:45.040 We think

01:18:45.640 he knew

01:18:46.040 it was a

01:18:46.500 lie.

01:18:47.720 It's just

01:18:48.280 that over

01:18:48.800 and over

01:18:49.120 again.

01:18:49.520 It's just

01:18:49.980 one story.

01:18:51.500 Just change

01:18:52.200 the variables

01:18:52.740 and it's

01:18:53.320 the same

01:18:53.800 story over

01:18:54.400 and over

01:18:54.740 again.

01:18:55.340 All right.

01:19:03.040 Everyone

01:19:03.440 clapped,

01:19:04.260 I bet,

01:19:04.640 when you

01:19:05.000 beat your

01:19:05.460 bullies.

01:19:06.180 No, I

01:19:06.560 don't think

01:19:06.820 they really

01:19:07.160 cared.

01:19:08.240 They were

01:19:08.780 doing their

01:19:09.200 own thing.

01:19:10.020 It just

01:19:10.340 happened to

01:19:10.640 be a busy

01:19:11.100 place.

01:19:12.380 It wasn't

01:19:12.900 that they

01:19:13.260 all crowded

01:19:13.940 around.

01:19:14.560 It just

01:19:14.860 wasn't in

01:19:15.440 front of

01:19:15.680 enough people

01:19:16.200 that there

01:19:16.660 were witnesses.

01:19:17.160 the real

01:19:26.280 story about

01:19:26.900 Fauci is

01:19:28.120 his terrifying

01:19:28.920 virility.

01:19:35.620 His

01:19:36.140 terrifying

01:19:36.840 virility.

01:19:41.760 That's pretty

01:19:42.460 good.

01:19:42.660 All right.

01:19:44.240 Ladies and

01:19:44.680 gentlemen,

01:19:45.100 that's all

01:19:45.420 for YouTube.

01:19:46.460 I'm going

01:19:46.680 to talk to

01:19:47.600 the local

01:19:48.360 subscribers

01:19:49.060 privately

01:19:49.580 here.

01:19:50.560 But thanks

01:19:51.000 for joining.

01:19:52.780 Fauci is

01:19:53.500 sexual.

01:19:54.140 Thank you.

01:19:54.200 Thank you.

01:19:54.260 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 11, 2022

Episode 1954 Scott Adams： More Twitter Revelations, So Juicy! Russian Arms Dealer Has Some Surprises

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript