Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1956 Scott Adams： I Tell You How The CIA Took Over The Country, Allegedly. And Lots More Fun

00:00:00.000 Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:08.580 Well, because I know you care about how much I slept, I see the question here already.

00:00:15.160 Not very much. That's why I accidentally started this live stream an hour earlier.

00:00:20.360 An hour earlier. But now I'm all in the right time zone and everything.

00:00:24.540 So, it's looking good.

00:00:25.960 How would you like to take this experience up to, oh, let's say Elon Musk levels?

00:00:33.100 Yeah. All you need is a cupper, a mug, a glass, a tanker, a chalester, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.240 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:41.680 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:44.620 The dopamine here today, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:46.720 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:49.600 It happens now. Go.

00:00:55.960 Hmm. Yeah. Okay.

00:01:00.300 I think we're all on the same page now.

00:01:04.300 Ah.

00:01:06.280 Well, there are so many things happening.

00:01:09.080 For example, some scientists are using gene editing to make mice that will not reproduce.

00:01:18.060 And apparently, if they make the male mice, they give them this little genetic defect.

00:01:24.940 And then the male mice will go around and eventually, it takes about three generations. 0.99

00:01:30.140 But if the mice do enough fucking, then all the offspring are also unable to have children. 0.97

00:01:37.980 And it basically gets rid of all the mice on the island. 0.99

00:01:43.660 Now, it wouldn't be too hard to imagine that going wrong, but here's what I'm thinking.

00:01:49.200 If you could make a mouse with a special characteristic, what exactly is the end point of that?

00:01:56.520 Is that sort of all we can do?

00:01:58.480 Or once you can play with their genes, can you make anything?

00:02:02.920 Because I'll tell you what I want.

00:02:04.800 I want something that's part pit bull, part hippopotamus, and part mouse.

00:02:10.840 I want the best of all those.

00:02:13.360 Pit bull, hippopotamus, and mouse.

00:02:15.660 I think I can get that.

00:02:18.120 I'll probably get like a home CRISPR gene editing kit.

00:02:22.940 Something like that.

00:02:24.880 Someday.

00:02:26.660 You know, I'm starting to think that the end of addiction is coming.

00:02:29.880 You heard that there's a vaccination that you could get, not yet, but someday, that would make fentanyl not work on you.

00:02:43.060 Now, I'm not sure that's the best approach, because some people might need the fentanyl later for an operation, so there's some complications there.

00:02:51.280 But now we know that ketamine is being tested on alcoholics, and initial indications are very positive that ketamine can help you quit alcohol, and maybe quit some other things.

00:03:06.340 So, I have a feeling that there's so much activity now on addressing addiction that maybe we'll guess something.

00:03:17.460 Yeah, now, let me ask you this.

00:03:22.480 There's definitely one way to end addiction, which is if Big Pharma says they developed a pill that might give you a little myocarditis, but it'll definitely get rid of your addiction.

00:03:35.460 And then, no more addiction.

00:03:37.880 A lot more myocarditis, but no addiction.

00:03:41.320 Anyway, I think, I feel like addiction is something that could fall to science within the next five years, which would be enormous.

00:03:53.020 It would be just the biggest thing that's happened.

00:03:55.140 But that's my positive spin.

00:03:58.180 Inflation is easing.

00:04:00.580 So, I guess the consumer prices haven't adjusted yet, but wholesale prices and core inflation seems to be down.

00:04:07.500 Now, that was our biggest problem.

00:04:13.640 It's our biggest problem, by far, that inflation is high.

00:04:18.840 But if it's coming down, we're going to be fine.

00:04:23.880 Now, you probably hate me for always saying that our systems are self-correcting.

00:04:28.340 I've been saying that a lot lately.

00:04:29.880 And I'm watching them self-correct in real time, and it's just, it's breathtaking.

00:04:34.280 Like, every time I see one of our systems self-correcting, I think, how did those, you know, founders of the country build a system that was so self-correcting?

00:04:46.800 Now, the self-correcting is that the economy will slow down.

00:04:53.120 The main thing that makes your inflation high is that too many people have money, and they're buying things and competing for the same limited goods.

00:05:00.620 Now, we had a supply problem that may be working out pretty soon, but that's a natural adjustment.

00:05:09.340 You know, inflation goes up, it has an impact on the economy, and people have less money, and it brings inflation back down.

00:05:17.460 And that's exactly what's happening.

00:05:19.520 So, we'll see a little bit of hit to the economy, but that has to happen to bring the inflation back down.

00:05:26.460 The FBI isn't self-correcting.

00:05:30.260 Yeah, that's true.

00:05:31.320 That's true.

00:05:31.840 We do have a problem with that.

00:05:34.660 So, that's good.

00:05:35.900 Here's another good news.

00:05:37.440 Now, I think this is way hyperbolic.

00:05:40.400 But the head of a big new chip manufacturing plant that's being built in Arizona, of all places, did you think you'd see that?

00:05:50.440 A major chip manufacturing plant in Arizona?

00:05:55.360 It's happening.

00:05:56.940 Now, the thinking is, and of course this is based on issues with China and threats to Taiwan and everything else,

00:06:03.440 but there are a few things we learned from this.

00:06:06.500 Number one, the head of this company has declared that globalism is dead.

00:06:12.740 Globalism is dead.

00:06:13.800 Now, the thinking is that you cannot depend on other countries to supply you with anything.

00:06:24.300 So, that's the globalism part.

00:06:26.340 You know, you can get your parts in any country and assemble it anywhere and sell it anywhere.

00:06:30.660 That's the global part.

00:06:32.140 But now it's clear that countries will use their supply chain as a weapon.

00:06:36.880 And if it's a weapon, you can't really depend on it, especially if you're on the other team.

00:06:42.960 So, I do think that this is the beginning of the end of globalism because big companies are not going to want to expose themselves to the country risk that didn't seem so big, you know, five years ago.

00:06:55.720 So, China is too risky for business.

00:06:59.280 One of the things I learned is that this big manufacturing plant of chips could not find enough American employees.

00:07:07.660 So, there were not enough high-skilled American chip designers and chip industry workers, and they weren't as close.

00:07:15.580 Basically, the total number of them were like zero.

00:07:18.980 And not really, but close to zero.

00:07:21.800 And they needed, I don't know, 600 engineers or something.

00:07:24.420 So, they got 300 American engineers, and they shipped them to Taiwan to train.

00:07:30.740 Because we couldn't even train them in the United States.

00:07:34.100 Does that worry you?

00:07:35.760 We couldn't even train them in the United States.

00:07:40.440 We sent them to Taiwan to learn how to make chips.

00:07:45.060 That bothers me.

00:07:47.080 And then we had to get 300 Taiwanese engineers to come over to America

00:07:52.180 to work with the ones who were trained just to make sure it all still works.

00:07:57.560 That's the most frightening thing I've heard.

00:07:59.260 I always thought that the United States had the technical training advantage over everybody.

00:08:05.120 Not even close.

00:08:06.860 Apparently, we gave it away at some point.

00:08:09.560 But it's coming back, so that's the good news.

00:08:12.820 Apparently, these chips will be more expensive, so your products might be more expensive, too.

00:08:16.740 My music teacher said something interesting to me yesterday.

00:08:24.460 So, I'm learning the drums, and now that I can kind of do most of the things a drummer can do,

00:08:31.300 you know, I would just have to practice to do it well, but I can kind of do the basics.

00:08:35.060 I decided to see what I could do on a guitar.

00:08:39.240 And I was starting to feel with just really no ability on the guitar at all.

00:08:45.660 I'm just trying to figure out where my fingers go, so I'm not making any music.

00:08:50.280 But even so, I felt that my drumming got better in a weird way.

00:08:57.600 And then my music teacher said there's something he sees over and over again.

00:09:02.700 And what he sees is that if somebody is learning one instrument,

00:09:08.680 you know, their progress is sort of, you know, predictable, how much better they get.

00:09:14.960 But if that person learns a second instrument,

00:09:19.400 the music teacher says he immediately sees that the first instrument is played better.

00:09:26.020 That's not really obvious, is it?

00:09:27.840 But I could feel it instantly.

00:09:29.400 As soon as I started listening more to other guitars and, you know,

00:09:33.880 sort of keying into what the guitar was doing and what it was all about,

00:09:37.380 I could play the drums better.

00:09:39.880 And I don't know exactly why, but it was very clear that there was like a,

00:09:43.820 you know, a step difference that happened almost kind of quickly.

00:09:47.400 Now, he says that he sees it all the time,

00:09:50.760 that playing one instrument makes you better on another instrument.

00:09:53.380 And it made me wonder if that's one of the secrets of the Beatles.

00:09:58.500 You know, McCartney played multiple instruments.

00:10:01.200 I think three out of four of the Beatles played the drums, if I'm not mistaken.

00:10:06.540 I think John Lennon played a little drums.

00:10:08.400 I saw that in a video once.

00:10:09.760 I mean, not well, but he played.

00:10:11.700 And McCartney played.

00:10:12.860 Ringo played.

00:10:13.900 So, you know, Ringo played the piano as well.

00:10:17.080 So I think they were, yeah, Dave Grohl.

00:10:18.960 So a lot of people who are multiple instrument people seem to be better.

00:10:22.260 But here's the question.

00:10:24.780 Is it because they added two talents, which is the obvious explanation,

00:10:30.440 or is it because anybody who would learn two instruments

00:10:34.160 is already a different person than somebody who would stop with one?

00:10:39.840 So it could be that you're just selecting a crowd that has a different characteristic.

00:10:44.860 It might be that.

00:10:45.980 But I do think they're compatible.

00:10:47.640 So look for situations in which having one extra talent makes everything work better.

00:10:55.380 That's one of my main themes in communicating,

00:10:58.900 is telling you to add skills to what you have to make them all more valuable.

00:11:02.880 Good example.

00:11:04.380 All right.

00:11:05.440 I am going to test you for narrative poisoning.

00:11:09.840 Now, narrative poisoning, by my definition,

00:11:15.400 is that the narrative, a story of what's true,

00:11:18.860 is so oppressive in a person's mind that they can't use rational thinking,

00:11:24.820 that the rational thinking is just overwhelmed by the narrative.

00:11:28.300 All right.

00:11:28.680 Now, certainly the employees of Twitter appear to have narrative poisoning.

00:11:34.320 We'll talk more about that.

00:11:35.780 But I'm going to test to see if you do.

00:11:37.380 All right.

00:11:39.260 I'm going to test to see if you do.

00:11:40.740 I'm going to read you a story,

00:11:42.240 and then I'm going to watch your comments.

00:11:45.380 And I'm going to see if anybody has narrative poisoning in the comments.

00:11:48.260 Okay.

00:11:49.280 Here's the story.

00:11:52.960 Did you know that in Japan,

00:11:55.360 they have one building code for the whole country?

00:11:58.800 One building code.

00:12:00.200 And this came up because somebody on Twitter said

00:12:01.980 they watched two people, two men,

00:12:04.980 build a three-story home by themselves in two days.

00:12:10.380 Basically, in Japan, there must be a kit,

00:12:13.420 some kind of a kit that you can build a home,

00:12:15.620 two people in three.

00:12:17.140 It's a three-story home.

00:12:18.300 That's impressive.

00:12:18.920 Now, given that Japan has lots of earthquake risks,

00:12:25.280 one assumes that the national code is really tight

00:12:28.420 because it has to protect.

00:12:31.280 But they also, apparently, I didn't know this,

00:12:33.280 they build homes for a 20- or 30-year life

00:12:36.060 where Americans try to get, you know,

00:12:38.340 100 years out of their home.

00:12:40.020 So they're a little bit more expendable, I'm told.

00:12:44.060 You know, I'm not the expert.

00:12:45.100 All right, so what do you think of the idea

00:12:48.340 of having, in America, a national building code

00:12:53.020 so that we'd have one building code

00:12:56.280 and then all of the experimental homes

00:12:59.720 wouldn't have to worry about all the different codes

00:13:02.440 they could build to one code?

00:13:04.920 What do you think of that?

00:13:09.240 What's wrong with it?

00:13:12.580 What's wrong with a national building code?

00:13:15.100 It defeats the purpose of estates, somebody says.

00:13:21.620 Kills innovation?

00:13:22.940 No, it increases innovation.

00:13:25.300 It increases innovation

00:13:26.640 because then everybody can build.

00:13:28.020 Right now, they can't.

00:13:38.060 Boy, a lot of comments go by here.

00:13:39.900 Now, is there anybody who thinks that it's a bad idea

00:13:46.200 because whenever the government adds any kind of code

00:13:50.600 or regulation, it's always bad?

00:13:52.340 Go.

00:13:52.820 Who would agree with that statement?

00:13:54.700 That whenever the government adds a regulation,

00:13:57.100 it's bad, right?

00:13:59.040 So this is a case of adding a regulation.

00:14:03.900 So it's bad by definition.

00:14:05.500 You don't need the details, right?

00:14:07.460 I don't need to get into the details

00:14:09.000 because as soon as the government adds a whole new regulation,

00:14:12.040 it's bad, right?

00:14:12.600 All right.

00:14:15.080 Everybody who agreed with that,

00:14:16.820 you are suffering narrative poisoning.

00:14:20.840 I just told you I was going to replace 50 regulations with one

00:14:24.860 and your narrative poisoning said,

00:14:28.280 no, adding a regulation is always bad.

00:14:31.640 I replaced 50 with one.

00:14:34.840 And you automatically said,

00:14:38.240 that's bad because more regulations is bad.

00:14:40.780 No.

00:14:41.360 I subtracted 49 regulations.

00:14:46.860 And your narrative poisoning told you that was bad

00:14:49.760 because adding regulations is bad.

00:14:52.680 Do you see it?

00:14:54.440 How many of you are willing to admit

00:14:56.380 that you fell into the narrative poisoning?

00:14:58.860 Is anybody willing to admit?

00:15:01.380 Yeah, you were blinded by it, right?

00:15:02.700 You were blinded by the obvious.

00:15:06.560 The obvious is that one is less than 50.

00:15:10.100 And I said it as clearly as you could say it.

00:15:12.860 One building code.

00:15:14.840 That was very clear, right?

00:15:17.220 One building code instead of 50.

00:15:20.600 And a whole bunch of you said,

00:15:22.020 that's too many new regulations

00:15:23.360 when I subtract 49 regulations.

00:15:26.720 Now, the reason I did this

00:15:29.900 is to prime you for the next story.

00:15:35.160 Because when you see the other people,

00:15:37.240 let's say Democrats,

00:15:38.360 are suffering narrative poisoning,

00:15:40.480 which they most certainly are,

00:15:42.480 don't think it's just them.

00:15:44.720 It's not just them.

00:15:46.620 I just proved it.

00:15:48.440 Right?

00:15:48.760 Now, a number of you passed the test.

00:15:52.100 Anybody want to take a bow?

00:15:54.380 Who, is there anybody here?

00:15:55.800 I want to see how many people.

00:15:56.680 How many of you immediately knew

00:15:58.880 I was going from 50 regulations to one?

00:16:02.260 Who saw it as soon as I said it?

00:16:05.960 See?

00:16:06.720 So, give yourselves a pat on the back.

00:16:09.560 Give yourselves a pat on the back.

00:16:11.040 You're the ones who are not influenced

00:16:12.660 by the narrative poisoning.

00:16:14.880 So, I like to think that my locals' audience

00:16:17.320 is the most sophisticated consumers of news in the world.

00:16:23.780 By the way, I think that's true.

00:16:24.920 You know, YouTube, if you watch me every day,

00:16:28.300 you may be pretty good, too.

00:16:30.220 But I'm convinced that the locals' subscription crowd

00:16:34.000 are the most sophisticated consumers of news

00:16:37.440 because we talk about it every day.

00:16:39.920 We talk about how to spot fake news, 0.99

00:16:41.920 how to spot bullshit, 0.99

00:16:43.280 what was real and what wasn't. 0.99

00:16:45.080 So, they're literally trained.

00:16:47.220 So, I'm not surprised that maybe there was

00:16:50.020 a high percentage of the locals' population

00:16:52.380 that didn't get bitten by the narrative.

00:16:56.160 All right.

00:16:58.880 We're going to circle back to that point.

00:17:02.100 Today was a milestone day.

00:17:04.760 It's the first time I've followed

00:17:06.520 an artificial intelligence on Twitter.

00:17:09.700 So, there's an artificial intelligence

00:17:13.040 that presents as a female 1.00

00:17:15.520 and it says it's artificial intelligence,

00:17:19.620 so it's not hiding anything.

00:17:21.340 And the reason I followed it was

00:17:23.680 I was interested.

00:17:26.660 The same reason I follow a real person.

00:17:29.740 I was just interested in the content.

00:17:31.580 Because I think maybe it'll

00:17:34.200 probably upgrade over time, get better.

00:17:37.440 At the moment, it's not that impressive

00:17:38.960 compared to what we've seen

00:17:40.360 in the last few months.

00:17:42.220 It's not that impressive.

00:17:43.860 But it's going to be a character

00:17:47.380 that filters the news.

00:17:50.780 I think it's already retweeting.

00:17:53.100 So, it's deciding what to retweet.

00:17:55.260 I think it decides on its own.

00:17:57.280 I don't know.

00:17:57.700 It's called Leah.

00:17:58.280 Leah, yeah.

00:18:00.800 Leah AI or something.

00:18:03.740 So, I'm not saying that

00:18:06.040 it's going to be a real entertaining account yet.

00:18:10.000 But the fact that I unambiguously said,

00:18:12.520 yeah, I'm going to follow that,

00:18:14.080 that felt like some kind of a turning point.

00:18:16.440 Because I'm not following it, like, ironically

00:18:19.140 or I'm not following it

00:18:20.940 at a pure curiosity.

00:18:23.480 I'm following it for the reasons

00:18:24.960 that people follow things on Twitter.

00:18:26.900 Just an ordinary reason.

00:18:28.280 It might have good content.

00:18:31.980 Do you remember me telling you

00:18:34.200 that I couldn't figure out

00:18:35.460 why Ukraine wouldn't be striking 1.00

00:18:38.220 deep into Moscow,

00:18:40.100 not Moscow, but deep into Russia

00:18:42.200 when Russia was taking out

00:18:44.660 their power plants?

00:18:46.660 Yeah, I couldn't understand

00:18:48.140 the military or even moral reason

00:18:50.480 you wouldn't take out Russia's power plants

00:18:53.280 or at least their military facilities.

00:18:55.720 But apparently Ukraine's getting pretty aggressive 0.93

00:18:57.920 and they're going deep into Russia

00:18:59.860 and there were two strikes on military bases

00:19:02.500 that are well into Russian territory

00:19:05.300 and getting closer to Moscow.

00:19:07.340 Now, I feel like that's a sign

00:19:10.020 that the Ukrainians are not planning to lose.

00:19:13.960 They're not playing for a draw.

00:19:15.740 That's pretty aggressive.

00:19:20.020 We'll keep an eye on that.

00:19:22.160 I believe, I don't know this for sure,

00:19:24.000 but I believe CNN has hired an entire staff of writers

00:19:26.880 whose only job

00:19:29.040 is to come up with new ways to say

00:19:32.280 that with Trump and his legal problems,

00:19:35.300 the walls are closing in.

00:19:38.420 Because, you know, they ran out of,

00:19:40.880 you know, numbers of times you can say that.

00:19:43.380 The numbers of times they had that in the headline,

00:19:45.760 the walls are closing in.

00:19:47.140 It was getting a little bit embarrassing.

00:19:50.180 And so now with this new team of people

00:19:52.360 whose only job is to write new ways

00:19:54.360 to say the walls are closing in.

00:19:56.300 In today's news,

00:19:57.540 they say that Trump might, quote,

00:20:00.540 be approaching a moment of maximum legal peril.

00:20:06.160 Yeah, that's not the walls closing.

00:20:09.260 He's approaching a moment of maximum legal peril.

00:20:12.800 And I believe all of the writers

00:20:14.220 that they hired for this position

00:20:16.780 are all ex-lawyers.

00:20:18.840 I think Jeffrey Toobin got a job there, maybe.

00:20:21.760 That'd be a perfect job for him, really.

00:20:24.300 So if ever there were a story 0.97

00:20:27.300 that's the news equivalent of jerking off, 0.98

00:20:31.800 it would be the walls are closing in 0.99

00:20:34.160 on Trump legally.

00:20:37.440 That's basically Jeffrey Toobin

00:20:39.840 is the perfect writer for those stories.

00:20:43.460 Because it's like, well, I guess I made my point.

00:20:47.860 All right.

00:20:51.800 The brainwashers are winning. 0.67

00:20:54.980 And boy, are they winning.

00:20:56.100 And mostly because we don't know

00:20:58.900 that we're being brainwashed a lot of times.

00:21:01.520 But the brainwashers are so good

00:21:03.340 that they've convinced us

00:21:05.860 that we individuals

00:21:08.200 need to take personal responsibility

00:21:10.580 for their crimes.

00:21:14.600 That's a real thing.

00:21:16.540 You are being brainwashed

00:21:18.160 by people who are convincing you

00:21:21.200 that you need to take the responsibility

00:21:23.820 personally for what they did to you.

00:21:27.460 And what they did to you

00:21:28.540 is brainwash you

00:21:29.440 so you couldn't see things clearly

00:21:31.020 until you acted in ways

00:21:33.240 that are socially inappropriate

00:21:34.420 and you ended up in January 6th jail

00:21:37.280 or you ended up a Twitter employee

00:21:39.620 and you got fired.

00:21:41.020 They're the same people.

00:21:43.320 There were people acting on a narrative

00:21:45.520 and they couldn't see things clearly

00:21:47.940 because the narrative was blinding them.

00:21:51.080 And then what are we all saying?

00:21:54.020 What are every one of us saying?

00:21:55.780 Oh, sure.

00:21:57.000 They may have been influenced by the media.

00:21:59.160 They may have been influenced by the narrative.

00:22:00.860 But it's personal responsibility.

00:22:02.840 So they're the ones who go to jail.

00:22:06.060 The ones who did the act.

00:22:07.580 It has to be that way.

00:22:09.720 The people who brainwashed

00:22:11.240 all of those people

00:22:12.440 also convinced them

00:22:14.620 it's their own fault.

00:22:16.440 That's as good as you can do.

00:22:18.640 That's the most commercial grade,

00:22:22.240 weapons grade.

00:22:23.520 You can't do better

00:22:24.680 than making somebody do your crime

00:22:27.140 and then think it's their fault

00:22:28.500 because that's what's happened.

00:22:30.060 The people whose arms and legs

00:22:32.680 committed the infractions

00:22:34.600 they have to suffer the legal consequence

00:22:38.000 because our legal system

00:22:39.620 has to put the focus

00:22:42.400 on the person who did the act.

00:22:44.360 It has to.

00:22:45.820 We can't have a legal system

00:22:47.540 that says,

00:22:48.500 well, you were influenced by Bob

00:22:50.000 so Bob goes to jail.

00:22:52.000 You couldn't have a system.

00:22:54.180 So the brainwashers have convinced you

00:22:58.160 that because our legal system

00:23:00.380 has this requirement

00:23:01.580 that individuals must take responsibility

00:23:03.920 for the ones who do the act,

00:23:05.700 you're conflating that 0.98

00:23:07.120 with whose fucking fault it is. 0.99

00:23:10.680 The legal system 0.99

00:23:12.120 has to put the January 6th people in jail

00:23:14.600 if they're the ones who broke a law.

00:23:17.620 It has no choice.

00:23:19.400 That's the only way it can work.

00:23:21.080 Nobody's come up with a better idea.

00:23:22.420 But while it's true

00:23:26.520 from a legal, technical perspective

00:23:30.180 that they are the lawbreakers,

00:23:32.380 it's also not their fault

00:23:33.980 because they were caused to do it

00:23:36.780 by bad actors

00:23:37.680 who knew what they were doing.

00:23:39.940 Now, you could argue

00:23:41.320 who are those bad actors.

00:23:42.760 I think in the case of the Republicans,

00:23:46.940 the brainwashing is distributed

00:23:48.640 and organic,

00:23:50.480 meaning that I don't know

00:23:51.880 that there's any entity

00:23:52.840 that's especially skilled

00:23:54.400 at brainwashing.

00:23:55.960 I feel like individuals

00:23:57.140 come up with conspiracy theories

00:23:59.420 and other things,

00:24:00.700 and sometimes they spread

00:24:01.960 and sometimes they don't.

00:24:03.500 But on the right,

00:24:05.120 it appears organic.

00:24:07.460 Does it appear organic on the left?

00:24:10.680 Do you think that the narratives

00:24:12.860 on the left spring up

00:24:15.120 as naturally as they do on the right?

00:24:16.900 Well, here's what we learned

00:24:20.860 from the Twitter files.

00:24:23.220 For me, the Twitter files

00:24:24.620 finally brought everything together.

00:24:27.280 That with a few other things.

00:24:31.220 It looks like this.

00:24:34.240 Now, let me give you

00:24:35.280 a lead-up story

00:24:36.700 before I talk about this.

00:24:38.940 Here's the lead-up story.

00:24:41.000 John Brennan has surfaced,

00:24:44.340 believe it or not,

00:24:45.400 ex-head of the CIA.

00:24:48.360 And he's going hard

00:24:49.500 at Elon Musk

00:24:50.620 because Musk thinks

00:24:53.120 that Fauci should be prosecuted.

00:24:55.420 And Musk was suggesting

00:24:56.880 he might have something

00:24:57.720 that would cause that to happen,

00:24:58.820 but I'm not sure that's true.

00:25:01.860 So John Brennan goes hard

00:25:03.360 at Musk.

00:25:08.140 Now, do you remember

00:25:10.020 John Brennan

00:25:12.240 was one of the guys

00:25:13.840 who put together

00:25:14.360 the 50 or so

00:25:16.320 intel professionals

00:25:17.960 who said the laptop was fake?

00:25:20.600 John Brennan

00:25:21.440 was one of the main architects

00:25:23.080 of the Russia collusion hoax.

00:25:25.960 He's literally 0.95

00:25:26.800 the professional intel liar. 0.90

00:25:30.120 And if you don't know that, 0.97

00:25:31.760 you wouldn't understand the news.

00:25:33.740 As soon as he comes on,

00:25:34.880 you should say,

00:25:35.360 oh, it's the disinformation guy.

00:25:37.160 He's literally

00:25:38.520 the disinformation guy.

00:25:40.860 He's the one they put on

00:25:42.340 specifically for disinformation.

00:25:45.320 It's Adam Schiff,

00:25:47.200 right,

00:25:47.620 and this guy,

00:25:48.500 and Swalwell sometimes,

00:25:50.140 right,

00:25:50.720 and Clapper.

00:25:53.160 If you see Clapper

00:25:54.240 or Brennan

00:25:54.940 or Schiff,

00:25:56.360 they're lying.

00:25:57.780 And the reason you know that

00:25:58.660 is because that's the only reason

00:25:59.940 they go on TV.

00:26:01.240 When something is true

00:26:02.640 and can be validated,

00:26:03.820 they have other people do it.

00:26:05.620 If something's true

00:26:06.640 and can be validated,

00:26:08.520 you know,

00:26:08.800 then Chuck Schumer's

00:26:09.560 going to say it.

00:26:10.760 If it's not true

00:26:11.800 and it can't be validated,

00:26:13.500 who do they have,

00:26:14.260 who do they put on to say it?

00:26:16.420 Brennan,

00:26:17.120 Clapper,

00:26:17.760 and Schiff.

00:26:18.600 Every time. 1.00

00:26:19.520 It's the same fucking guys. 1.00

00:26:21.080 Like, 1.00

00:26:21.300 if you haven't seen the pattern yet,

00:26:22.940 you're really not paying attention.

00:26:24.660 And of course,

00:26:25.180 they depend on you

00:26:25.940 not seeing the pattern.

00:26:27.600 All right,

00:26:27.780 so remember

00:26:28.460 when Schumer warned Trump

00:26:31.260 that going after the intel people,

00:26:33.780 the intel people had,

00:26:35.380 what did he say,

00:26:36.180 a million ways from Sunday,

00:26:38.920 six ways from Sunday

00:26:39.840 to get back at you.

00:26:41.980 He was saying directly

00:26:43.480 that the intel agencies

00:26:46.340 seek revenge on politicians.

00:26:50.840 Would he know?

00:26:52.740 Would Chuck Schumer

00:26:53.720 be in a position to know

00:26:55.000 that that's a true statement?

00:26:56.740 Hell yes.

00:26:59.580 Of course he would know.

00:27:02.160 Do you think

00:27:02.760 he would lie about it?

00:27:04.740 Does that sound like

00:27:06.620 a Democrat lie

00:27:08.780 for advantage?

00:27:10.200 No,

00:27:10.640 it didn't give him

00:27:11.160 any advantage at all.

00:27:12.840 It was definitely

00:27:13.480 not an advantage.

00:27:15.300 I think it was just a slip.

00:27:17.720 I think he was just

00:27:18.500 being honest accidentally.

00:27:20.360 I don't think

00:27:20.820 he intended to say it.

00:27:21.840 I think later he was like, 0.99

00:27:22.760 oh shit, 1.00

00:27:23.720 they said that. 1.00

00:27:25.240 All right,

00:27:25.540 so keep in mind

00:27:26.720 and we'll pull this

00:27:27.900 all together a minute.

00:27:28.960 Keep in mind

00:27:29.660 that Brennan has surfaced again

00:27:31.780 just about when you'd expect

00:27:33.900 he would.

00:27:35.040 Just when you'd expect

00:27:36.000 he would.

00:27:36.560 Because the narrative

00:27:37.300 is starting to get away

00:27:38.380 from the left.

00:27:39.640 So the narrative killer

00:27:41.040 comes in to,

00:27:42.060 you know,

00:27:42.720 be the gunslinger

00:27:44.220 who tries to fix it.

00:27:45.620 now coincidentally,

00:27:49.360 or not,

00:27:51.260 depending on what you think

00:27:52.100 about the simulation,

00:27:53.720 in an unrelated story,

00:27:55.100 totally unrelated

00:27:55.920 and had nothing to do

00:27:56.840 with this,

00:27:58.200 Tucker Carlson

00:27:58.980 was talking to

00:28:00.280 Tulsi Gabbard

00:28:02.420 and Tucker reported

00:28:05.000 a story some years ago.

00:28:06.940 He was having a dinner

00:28:08.180 with a member

00:28:08.860 of the Intel Committee,

00:28:13.460 the Congressional Intel Committee.

00:28:16.020 And at the end

00:28:17.300 of the dinner,

00:28:17.920 he said,

00:28:18.240 hey,

00:28:18.420 you know,

00:28:18.620 send me a text.

00:28:19.980 And the head

00:28:20.820 of the Intel Committee

00:28:21.640 said,

00:28:22.040 oh,

00:28:22.340 I don't text

00:28:23.140 because the NSA

00:28:24.400 reads my texts.

00:28:25.480 And Tucker said,

00:28:28.340 you're the boss.

00:28:30.600 You're literally

00:28:31.180 the oversight guy,

00:28:32.580 one of them,

00:28:34.040 for the NSA

00:28:35.080 and you're afraid of them?

00:28:36.680 Like,

00:28:36.960 you think that you

00:28:37.740 are a victim

00:28:38.280 of the people

00:28:39.020 that should be

00:28:40.360 reporting to you?

00:28:41.700 And the answer

00:28:42.280 was yes.

00:28:44.360 That a member

00:28:44.920 of Congress

00:28:45.520 believed he was

00:28:46.260 being monitored

00:28:46.880 by the Intel community.

00:28:51.460 Okay?

00:28:53.060 Now,

00:28:53.540 here's why

00:28:58.720 you can pull it

00:28:59.380 all together.

00:29:01.580 There was a big mystery

00:29:02.780 that I've had

00:29:03.400 for years,

00:29:04.580 which is,

00:29:05.480 do Democrats

00:29:06.260 believe their own narrative?

00:29:08.360 Have you ever

00:29:08.780 wondered that?

00:29:10.320 Like,

00:29:10.540 what are the things

00:29:11.260 they say

00:29:11.740 because they know 0.99

00:29:12.620 that being ridiculous 0.99

00:29:13.560 will get them 0.99

00:29:14.900 a good outcome?

00:29:16.500 Versus,

00:29:17.020 what are the things

00:29:17.580 they say

00:29:18.100 that they actually believe?

00:29:20.740 And the Twitter files

00:29:21.900 is the first time

00:29:22.720 I've ever seen

00:29:23.520 something close

00:29:25.640 to unfiltered opinion

00:29:26.980 from leftists

00:29:28.900 who believed

00:29:29.400 they were not

00:29:29.980 talking in public.

00:29:32.020 Right?

00:29:32.160 It was a little bit public

00:29:33.040 because it was,

00:29:33.660 you know,

00:29:34.620 internal messages

00:29:35.600 with a number

00:29:36.200 of people on it.

00:29:36.940 But they thought

00:29:37.540 they were all

00:29:38.200 on the same page,

00:29:39.360 right?

00:29:39.740 It seemed private-ish.

00:29:41.920 And you could tell

00:29:42.860 from their communications

00:29:43.800 that they actually believed

00:29:46.200 there was an insurrection

00:29:47.840 and that Trump

00:29:48.780 was a Nazi 0.98

00:29:50.260 and people who voted

00:29:51.560 for them 0.96

00:29:51.900 were probably Nazis.

00:29:53.560 They actually believed that.

00:29:55.020 The people who acted

00:29:56.640 to ban

00:29:57.500 were acting

00:29:58.480 because they were

00:29:59.080 literally frightened.

00:30:00.780 They were frightened.

00:30:02.020 It was absolutely genuine.

00:30:05.040 How does that happen?

00:30:07.360 Now,

00:30:07.940 most of us,

00:30:08.820 and I'm in this category,

00:30:10.680 I was under the impression

00:30:11.900 that the social media companies

00:30:13.620 were the creators

00:30:15.080 of the narrative.

00:30:16.280 I think I've even said

00:30:17.200 that for years,

00:30:17.880 that they're the creators

00:30:19.440 of the narrative.

00:30:20.560 And that if the social media owners

00:30:22.220 decide what you see

00:30:23.860 or don't see,

00:30:24.940 that's how the narrative

00:30:25.960 gets formed

00:30:26.640 and they just know

00:30:28.500 what to do.

00:30:29.820 So, you know,

00:30:30.520 they don't have to get

00:30:31.120 any marching orders.

00:30:32.380 Everybody just sort of knows

00:30:33.660 what to do for their team.

00:30:36.080 And the Twitter files

00:30:37.480 tells me that

00:30:38.460 that was completely wrong.

00:30:40.820 That the Twitter employees

00:30:43.340 were suffering from,

00:30:44.580 yeah,

00:30:45.380 mass hysteria,

00:30:46.180 but narrative poisoning.

00:30:48.960 They were actually

00:30:49.480 believing their own side

00:30:51.020 and they were believing 0.98

00:30:52.420 ridiculous things. 0.96

00:30:54.000 And they believed 0.99

00:30:54.580 it at the point

00:30:55.100 of mental illness.

00:30:56.600 Now,

00:30:56.840 when I say mental illness, 0.59

00:30:57.840 I'm not using that

00:30:59.100 as an insult

00:30:59.760 because I think

00:31:01.260 that politics

00:31:01.860 is making us 0.99

00:31:02.540 all mentally ill, 0.99

00:31:03.620 some more than others. 1.00

00:31:04.820 So I'm using it

00:31:05.620 as a descriptive term,

00:31:06.860 not a derogatory term.

00:31:09.060 And I believe

00:31:09.600 that what we saw

00:31:11.220 in the Twitter files

00:31:12.900 was mass mental illness.

00:31:16.180 But it wasn't organic.

00:31:19.960 It was created

00:31:22.300 by somebody

00:31:23.700 who knows how to do

00:31:25.760 persuasion

00:31:26.580 at a level

00:31:27.860 that you don't see

00:31:28.880 in politics.

00:31:32.600 How many of you

00:31:33.500 remember

00:31:33.940 my most,

00:31:35.260 probably most amazing

00:31:36.880 call of all time?

00:31:38.160 Trump,

00:31:39.160 which was

00:31:39.840 in 2016

00:31:42.580 when the Democrats

00:31:46.800 started all saying

00:31:47.820 that Trump

00:31:48.600 was at a dark speech

00:31:50.300 and it was all dark,

00:31:51.560 dark, dark, dark.

00:31:53.180 And some of you remember

00:31:54.200 I immediately

00:31:55.020 picked that out

00:31:55.820 as not a political

00:31:57.140 level of skill,

00:31:59.540 that that was

00:32:00.000 a professional level

00:32:01.160 of persuasion.

00:32:02.480 It was not

00:32:03.340 what politicians

00:32:04.140 even know how to do.

00:32:05.160 And then later

00:32:07.140 there were confirmations

00:32:08.440 that Cialdini,

00:32:09.460 the greatest

00:32:09.940 or at least

00:32:10.680 most storied

00:32:11.720 and famous

00:32:12.900 persuader

00:32:13.460 of all times,

00:32:14.980 either he

00:32:15.620 or maybe somebody

00:32:16.540 that he trained

00:32:17.340 or was a student

00:32:18.920 of his,

00:32:19.660 probably was behind that.

00:32:22.260 So I say that

00:32:23.600 just to tell you

00:32:24.860 that I can spot

00:32:25.980 commercial-grade

00:32:27.740 persuasion

00:32:28.500 because it really

00:32:29.500 stands out

00:32:30.200 versus ordinary

00:32:31.920 hypocrisy,

00:32:33.380 U2 kind of 0.78

00:32:35.400 political stuff.

00:32:36.680 Political stuff

00:32:37.440 is just lying 0.65

00:32:38.380 and hypocrisy 0.99

00:32:39.880 and you did it too. 0.85

00:32:42.340 Well, there's not

00:32:43.400 much persuasion

00:32:44.140 going on.

00:32:44.860 It's really just

00:32:45.400 basic, you know,

00:32:46.700 in-the-weed stuff.

00:32:48.580 But lately it seems,

00:32:52.300 especially with

00:32:53.060 the Trump stuff,

00:32:54.280 that we're seeing

00:32:54.980 too much

00:32:55.460 professional persuasion.

00:32:57.800 And what it looks

00:32:59.560 like is that

00:33:00.160 probably the CIA,

00:33:01.520 maybe, I don't know,

00:33:02.280 some other intel-related

00:33:03.500 people,

00:33:03.940 but let's say the CIA

00:33:04.860 because Brennan

00:33:05.960 seems to be too

00:33:06.700 prominent.

00:33:08.060 It looks like they

00:33:08.940 work with

00:33:09.680 or have some

00:33:10.520 control over the DNC.

00:33:12.220 Do you think

00:33:12.800 they work with

00:33:13.440 the DNC?

00:33:14.800 Do you think the CIA

00:33:15.580 works with Schumer?

00:33:19.460 No.

00:33:20.540 Schumer is clearly

00:33:21.440 afraid of them.

00:33:23.220 He said so.

00:33:24.800 He's clearly

00:33:25.520 afraid of them.

00:33:26.620 So if Schumer

00:33:28.060 has a meeting

00:33:28.580 with the CIA,

00:33:29.620 who gets their way?

00:33:30.620 the one who's

00:33:32.520 afraid?

00:33:34.220 Or the other one?

00:33:36.140 I don't know.

00:33:37.140 So it's probably,

00:33:38.000 I'm sure there's

00:33:38.560 some interplay here.

00:33:39.860 You know,

00:33:40.020 it's not as clean

00:33:40.780 as one's the boss.

00:33:42.220 But I would say

00:33:42.920 the influence is

00:33:43.680 starting with the

00:33:44.400 intelligence agencies.

00:33:46.140 They're working out

00:33:47.540 narratives with the DNC.

00:33:50.020 The fake news

00:33:50.800 picks up the narrative.

00:33:52.280 And when they do,

00:33:53.900 the narratives

00:33:54.440 they pick up

00:33:55.220 are not

00:33:56.240 politician-made.

00:33:57.880 because that would

00:33:58.940 be like,

00:33:59.660 if you see

00:34:02.220 A-plus persuasion

00:34:03.460 coming out of

00:34:04.380 one of the news

00:34:05.480 agencies,

00:34:06.420 it's not because

00:34:07.740 Jake Tapper

00:34:08.360 thought of it.

00:34:10.060 It's not because

00:34:10.840 Don Lemon

00:34:11.360 had a great idea.

00:34:13.020 That's not happening.

00:34:14.560 It's because

00:34:15.240 somebody who knows

00:34:16.220 how to do this

00:34:17.060 worked with the DNC.

00:34:19.520 The DNC is at

00:34:20.540 least smart enough

00:34:21.160 to know what a good

00:34:21.880 persuasion looks like.

00:34:23.340 They're not smart

00:34:24.060 enough to make it.

00:34:25.520 So they need

00:34:26.200 somebody who's smart

00:34:26.780 enough to create it.

00:34:28.160 The DNC only has

00:34:29.200 to be smart enough

00:34:29.880 to trust it

00:34:30.580 and know it looks

00:34:31.120 good and test it.

00:34:32.840 Then they test it

00:34:33.720 through the media.

00:34:34.760 You've noticed

00:34:35.280 they all have the

00:34:35.800 same stories

00:34:36.320 at the same time.

00:34:38.000 And that affects

00:34:39.360 the employees

00:34:40.380 as social media.

00:34:41.980 But by the time

00:34:42.700 you get to social media,

00:34:44.020 the persuasion

00:34:44.660 has been laundered.

00:34:46.640 It got laundered

00:34:47.440 through the news.

00:34:48.900 So now you've

00:34:49.600 lost the source.

00:34:51.380 Oh, I heard it

00:34:52.080 on the news.

00:34:53.220 It must be the news

00:34:54.220 that's influencing me.

00:34:55.720 That's laundering

00:34:56.540 the persuasion.

00:34:57.220 You can't tell

00:34:57.960 where it came from.

00:34:58.700 It didn't come

00:34:59.140 from the news.

00:35:00.300 They were not

00:35:00.820 the originators.

00:35:02.980 So by the time

00:35:04.280 the, and you can see

00:35:05.360 the Twitter files

00:35:06.100 people believed

00:35:06.780 there was real danger

00:35:07.780 and 100% of what

00:35:09.740 they talked about

00:35:10.520 was the risk

00:35:11.980 of real danger.

00:35:13.320 They never talked

00:35:14.360 about what was

00:35:15.040 good for Twitter.

00:35:16.760 Did they?

00:35:18.280 I mean, maybe

00:35:18.840 indirectly?

00:35:20.180 But they weren't

00:35:20.940 even worrying

00:35:21.420 about their jobs.

00:35:22.420 They weren't

00:35:22.980 worrying about

00:35:23.680 Twitter.

00:35:25.700 It looked to me

00:35:26.500 like they were

00:35:27.040 worrying specifically

00:35:28.480 about violence.

00:35:30.320 They looked like

00:35:30.940 they were actually

00:35:31.620 literally afraid.

00:35:33.280 And the only way

00:35:33.860 you can explain that,

00:35:37.740 oh, Bongino 0.99

00:35:38.300 was saying,

00:35:39.560 Bongino was saying

00:35:40.500 this three years ago

00:35:41.300 as the method

00:35:41.800 of Russiagate.

00:35:42.660 Well, Russiagate

00:35:43.220 was more straightforward.

00:35:45.200 With Russiagate,

00:35:46.740 you could see that

00:35:47.760 Brennan and the CIA

00:35:48.660 were behind it.

00:35:49.360 So that one was

00:35:50.220 straightforward.

00:35:53.500 What I'm adding

00:35:54.720 is it wasn't

00:35:56.180 a one-off.

00:35:58.040 If you thought

00:35:59.480 Russiagate was

00:36:00.340 a one-off,

00:36:01.200 people got together

00:36:02.020 in a special way

00:36:02.780 to do a special thing,

00:36:04.200 you're missing the show.

00:36:05.920 The show is

00:36:06.700 that this is

00:36:07.320 a permanent structure.

00:36:09.540 And I don't think

00:36:11.860 that the right

00:36:13.480 has the equivalent

00:36:15.200 of this.

00:36:15.880 Who would be

00:36:19.100 at the top

00:36:19.620 of the pile

00:36:20.160 for the right?

00:36:23.580 Who's the top

00:36:24.340 of the pile

00:36:24.780 for the right?

00:36:28.100 There you go.

00:36:29.620 Dan Bongino?

00:36:30.760 Elon Musk?

00:36:35.260 No one?

00:36:37.240 All right,

00:36:37.820 well, they got you again.

00:36:39.300 They got you again.

00:36:41.000 There's an obvious answer,

00:36:43.140 and you're blinded to it.

00:36:44.480 I haven't seen

00:36:46.900 one person.

00:36:48.860 Thank you.

00:36:50.140 Murdoch.

00:36:51.360 Right.

00:36:52.260 That's Murdoch.

00:36:53.540 On the right,

00:36:55.200 Murdoch decides

00:36:56.220 what does

00:36:57.000 or does not show

00:36:57.840 on Fox News

00:36:59.680 and the New York Post

00:37:01.280 and the Wall Street Journal.

00:37:03.460 And that's where

00:37:04.240 the right gets

00:37:05.140 his marching orders.

00:37:07.480 Right.

00:37:08.020 Have you noticed

00:37:08.600 that Fox News

00:37:09.420 is not covering Trump

00:37:10.480 as much this year?

00:37:11.220 Where do you think

00:37:12.900 that comes from?

00:37:14.480 Murdoch.

00:37:16.460 Right.

00:37:17.020 Yeah.

00:37:17.400 Very specifically.

00:37:18.980 Now,

00:37:19.680 in the case of Murdoch,

00:37:21.800 what I don't see

00:37:23.540 is professional persuasion.

00:37:27.100 I don't see it at all.

00:37:28.900 It's like straight,

00:37:30.280 it's sort of like

00:37:31.060 just somebody

00:37:34.040 who owns

00:37:34.460 a lot of press

00:37:35.320 persuasion.

00:37:36.120 So his persuasion

00:37:37.560 is more like volume.

00:37:39.360 I'll just have

00:37:39.980 everybody

00:37:40.500 kind of be

00:37:41.860 on the same page

00:37:42.740 and

00:37:44.120 if there's a lot

00:37:45.880 of it being said,

00:37:46.680 that's all you need.

00:37:47.940 So it's very

00:37:48.640 Murdoch's persuasion,

00:37:50.220 yeah,

00:37:50.420 brew force,

00:37:51.040 thank you.

00:37:51.720 Yeah,

00:37:51.880 Murdoch's persuasion

00:37:52.960 is muscle.

00:37:55.860 The Democrat persuasion

00:37:57.420 also has muscle

00:37:58.320 because they have

00:37:58.900 the whole

00:37:59.160 mainstream media,

00:37:59.820 but it's

00:38:02.160 clearly

00:38:02.680 professionally made.

00:38:04.740 The difference

00:38:05.360 in the persuasion

00:38:06.100 is very clear.

00:38:07.600 Murdoch has a bias

00:38:09.020 and he can move

00:38:10.180 the needle

00:38:11.100 and it's definitely

00:38:12.780 persuasion

00:38:13.380 but I never see

00:38:15.600 anything in the

00:38:16.280 Murdoch messaging

00:38:18.040 that looks like

00:38:19.540 it came from Murdoch

00:38:20.720 and got into the news

00:38:22.000 and then got into

00:38:23.260 social media

00:38:23.860 and then got into us.

00:38:26.080 Maybe it exists

00:38:26.960 but I've never seen it.

00:38:29.820 It looks like

00:38:30.620 he's got a,

00:38:31.260 you know,

00:38:32.400 I hate to say it,

00:38:33.580 a slightly more

00:38:34.380 transparent model

00:38:35.600 because you know

00:38:36.480 who the boss is

00:38:37.340 and you know

00:38:38.040 a lot about him

00:38:38.700 so you can see

00:38:40.100 his bias at least

00:38:40.960 when it pops out

00:38:42.100 and that's worth

00:38:43.600 something.

00:38:44.600 That's probably

00:38:45.000 as close as you

00:38:45.800 can get to transparency

00:38:46.960 is knowing

00:38:48.240 the people involved.

00:38:50.000 That's about as close

00:38:50.640 as you can get.

00:38:56.700 Now,

00:38:57.220 the best persuasion

00:38:59.840 on the right

00:39:00.600 where does it

00:39:02.040 come from?

00:39:03.240 When you see

00:39:04.020 some persuasion

00:39:04.780 on the right

00:39:05.360 that's really good

00:39:06.540 where does it

00:39:08.240 come from?

00:39:11.200 Some people

00:39:12.040 saying Tucker

00:39:12.680 some people

00:39:14.560 saying me.

00:39:17.000 Now,

00:39:17.540 is Tucker

00:39:18.000 persuasive

00:39:19.060 in a

00:39:20.120 classic sense

00:39:21.180 or does he

00:39:22.160 just have a

00:39:22.680 big platform?

00:39:23.640 I guess he's

00:39:27.600 persuasive

00:39:28.100 in the way

00:39:28.700 a documentary

00:39:30.520 is persuasive.

00:39:31.700 If you watch

00:39:32.600 half an hour

00:39:33.240 of Tucker

00:39:33.680 you're getting

00:39:35.020 half an hour

00:39:35.580 of just Tucker

00:39:36.500 and people

00:39:38.380 agree with him.

00:39:39.500 So,

00:39:40.100 it's convincing

00:39:41.320 because there's

00:39:42.200 not a counterpoint.

00:39:44.640 But that's

00:39:45.020 a little different,

00:39:45.740 no,

00:39:45.960 that's a lot

00:39:46.340 different than

00:39:47.060 being convincing

00:39:47.840 through the

00:39:49.560 skill of persuasion.

00:39:51.020 With Tucker

00:39:51.580 I don't note

00:39:52.780 technique.

00:39:55.340 He has

00:39:55.940 journalist technique

00:39:56.920 which is what

00:39:57.720 he should have,

00:39:58.240 right?

00:39:58.840 So,

00:39:59.120 Tucker has

00:39:59.500 journalist technique

00:40:00.600 very,

00:40:01.720 very good.

00:40:02.080 By the way,

00:40:03.000 let me just

00:40:03.580 give him a compliment.

00:40:05.580 I don't agree

00:40:06.560 with,

00:40:07.420 I don't know,

00:40:07.980 20% of what

00:40:09.100 Tucker says.

00:40:10.620 So,

00:40:11.000 it's important

00:40:12.240 to say that

00:40:12.880 because you want

00:40:13.580 to know

00:40:13.900 who's in the bag

00:40:15.080 for who.

00:40:16.040 I like 80%

00:40:17.180 of what he says,

00:40:17.800 20% I think,

00:40:18.840 well,

00:40:18.960 that's too far,

00:40:19.860 too far.

00:40:20.220 But I'll tell

00:40:21.840 you what I'll

00:40:22.240 give him.

00:40:23.080 I was watching

00:40:23.620 his show,

00:40:24.140 I forget what

00:40:24.580 day it was,

00:40:25.060 maybe last week.

00:40:26.900 It's the best

00:40:27.500 show.

00:40:28.460 It is just

00:40:28.980 the best

00:40:29.700 show.

00:40:31.500 Like,

00:40:31.840 the level

00:40:32.600 of skill

00:40:35.120 that he

00:40:36.340 brings to

00:40:36.940 the,

00:40:37.700 you know,

00:40:38.020 the,

00:40:38.200 I don't know,

00:40:38.520 15 minutes

00:40:39.240 a day that

00:40:39.700 he's just

00:40:40.520 giving his

00:40:40.920 own opinion,

00:40:41.900 that 15

00:40:42.680 minutes is

00:40:43.340 just unparalleled.

00:40:45.800 I don't think

00:40:46.280 there's anybody

00:40:46.800 on either side

00:40:48.120 who's currently

00:40:49.400 operating at

00:40:50.220 his level.

00:40:51.180 Would you

00:40:51.460 agree?

00:40:52.820 I mean,

00:40:53.080 there's plenty

00:40:53.460 of great people

00:40:54.060 in the game,

00:40:54.560 but at the

00:40:54.960 moment,

00:40:56.220 he's,

00:40:56.500 I think he's

00:40:56.960 alone.

00:40:57.760 He's sort

00:40:58.080 of alone in

00:40:58.700 his territory.

00:41:00.180 I think

00:41:00.580 Hannity is,

00:41:02.660 Hannity looks

00:41:03.300 like he's

00:41:03.700 coasting,

00:41:04.560 because he

00:41:06.580 can.

00:41:07.120 You know,

00:41:07.300 he's got a

00:41:07.740 popular show,

00:41:08.740 and he knows

00:41:10.020 what people

00:41:10.380 like,

00:41:10.700 so he does

00:41:11.100 it.

00:41:11.900 But I feel

00:41:12.420 like Tucker

00:41:12.900 is still

00:41:13.360 growing.

00:41:14.820 Like,

00:41:15.080 Tucker is

00:41:15.600 stronger today

00:41:16.760 than he was

00:41:17.240 last year.

00:41:18.220 He was 0.97

00:41:18.480 pretty damn

00:41:19.200 strong out

00:41:19.720 last year.

00:41:22.580 Yeah.

00:41:25.360 All right,

00:41:25.980 so here's,

00:41:27.460 oh,

00:41:28.660 here's some

00:41:30.360 related stories.

00:41:31.200 We'll tie them

00:41:31.600 all together.

00:41:34.400 I understand

00:41:35.300 why Trump

00:41:37.020 was banned

00:41:38.520 on Twitter,

00:41:39.700 because we've

00:41:40.180 seen enough

00:41:40.740 to tell us.

00:41:41.920 My interpretation,

00:41:42.940 we'll see if it's

00:41:43.420 yours,

00:41:44.360 is that the

00:41:44.920 staff were

00:41:45.740 genuinely

00:41:46.780 concerned.

00:41:48.200 He didn't

00:41:48.800 technically

00:41:49.620 violate anything,

00:41:51.180 but for what

00:41:52.120 they thought

00:41:52.540 was the greater

00:41:53.180 good,

00:41:53.960 from their

00:41:54.680 worldview,

00:41:55.980 they thought,

00:41:56.540 we'll bend

00:41:56.880 the rules a

00:41:57.420 little bit

00:41:57.840 to do the

00:41:58.900 greater good,

00:41:59.900 maybe stop

00:42:00.460 this violence.

00:42:01.400 I think they

00:42:02.160 thought they

00:42:02.480 were doing

00:42:02.700 the right thing.

00:42:03.540 Now,

00:42:03.800 whether you

00:42:04.100 think they

00:42:04.420 were right

00:42:04.800 or wrong,

00:42:05.760 that's not

00:42:06.320 the argument

00:42:06.740 I'm going

00:42:07.020 to have at

00:42:07.280 the moment,

00:42:08.220 because I

00:42:08.520 already know

00:42:09.060 what you

00:42:09.260 think about

00:42:09.600 that.

00:42:10.560 But that's

00:42:11.180 just context.

00:42:11.820 here's my

00:42:13.160 point.

00:42:14.600 If we

00:42:15.260 know why

00:42:15.720 the people

00:42:16.160 who had

00:42:16.560 at least

00:42:17.200 a little

00:42:18.060 bit of an

00:42:18.480 argument that

00:42:19.280 maybe they

00:42:19.740 were doing

00:42:20.020 something dangerous

00:42:20.880 or inciting,

00:42:22.800 how do you

00:42:23.220 explain my

00:42:24.960 account being

00:42:25.980 shadow banned?

00:42:27.540 I've never

00:42:28.000 done anything

00:42:28.460 that's even

00:42:28.840 close to

00:42:29.860 inciting

00:42:30.220 violence.

00:42:31.140 Never been

00:42:31.520 accused.

00:42:32.240 I've never

00:42:32.560 gotten a

00:42:32.900 warning.

00:42:34.260 Twitter's

00:42:34.720 never given

00:42:35.100 me a

00:42:35.340 warning.

00:42:36.640 So I

00:42:38.040 believe if

00:42:38.760 you could

00:42:39.100 find out

00:42:39.640 why you

00:42:40.840 meeting Elon

00:42:41.620 Musk,

00:42:42.180 if Musk

00:42:42.960 can find

00:42:43.560 out why

00:42:44.520 my account

00:42:45.260 is throttled,

00:42:46.720 then we'll

00:42:48.180 really know

00:42:48.600 something.

00:42:49.800 Because here's

00:42:50.340 the difference.

00:42:52.080 If Trump 0.85

00:42:53.240 was throttled, 0.82

00:42:55.320 maybe it was

00:42:56.120 political,

00:42:57.800 but at least

00:42:58.460 they had an

00:42:58.820 argument about

00:42:59.620 this violence

00:43:00.240 thing.

00:43:00.980 You're like,

00:43:01.340 I'm not sure

00:43:02.200 that's a real

00:43:02.720 argument.

00:43:03.700 You really

00:43:04.100 have to stretch

00:43:04.740 that and

00:43:05.140 torture it,

00:43:05.900 but at least

00:43:07.120 it is an

00:43:08.820 argument,

00:43:09.160 and at

00:43:10.220 least it

00:43:10.540 is compatible

00:43:11.160 with what

00:43:11.900 appeared to

00:43:12.400 be their

00:43:12.680 actual opinion

00:43:13.400 that there

00:43:13.900 was some

00:43:14.140 danger.

00:43:15.540 But what

00:43:16.080 about me?

00:43:17.520 What about

00:43:17.940 me?

00:43:18.660 If it

00:43:19.180 turns out

00:43:19.740 that I'm

00:43:20.980 correct and

00:43:21.680 that I was

00:43:22.060 shadowbanned,

00:43:22.740 it seems

00:43:23.320 obvious,

00:43:23.880 but who

00:43:24.380 knows?

00:43:25.060 Could be

00:43:25.380 wrong.

00:43:26.200 But if it

00:43:26.600 turns out

00:43:26.940 that's

00:43:27.180 confirmed,

00:43:28.160 what would

00:43:28.660 be any

00:43:29.300 reason for

00:43:30.160 shadowbanning

00:43:30.860 me that

00:43:32.860 wasn't

00:43:33.160 political?

00:43:34.540 Right?

00:43:34.940 There's no

00:43:35.420 argument in

00:43:36.100 my case about

00:43:37.440 any potential

00:43:38.300 incitement or

00:43:39.020 violence,

00:43:39.440 nothing.

00:43:40.320 And nor

00:43:40.820 have I been

00:43:41.220 accused of

00:43:42.140 bigotry or

00:43:44.400 anything that

00:43:44.980 would be a

00:43:45.540 mark against

00:43:46.580 me.

00:43:48.500 If I'm

00:43:49.300 shadowbanned,

00:43:52.080 and it was

00:43:52.900 a specific

00:43:53.480 decision,

00:43:54.680 I'll get to

00:43:55.100 that next,

00:43:55.780 if there was

00:43:56.240 a decision

00:43:56.840 about me

00:43:57.360 personally,

00:43:58.520 that would

00:43:59.200 look completely

00:43:59.880 political.

00:44:01.100 Whereas the

00:44:01.800 Trump one,

00:44:02.540 they've done

00:44:02.920 a good job

00:44:03.520 of making

00:44:04.920 it messy.

00:44:06.080 Well, it

00:44:06.640 does look

00:44:07.100 political,

00:44:08.020 but they

00:44:08.820 did have

00:44:09.220 that argument,

00:44:09.960 and it

00:44:10.240 does look

00:44:10.760 like they

00:44:11.100 believe their

00:44:11.600 own argument,

00:44:12.180 even if you

00:44:12.660 don't.

00:44:14.100 So that was

00:44:14.560 a little

00:44:14.780 argument.

00:44:15.400 But what

00:44:15.720 would be

00:44:15.940 the argument

00:44:16.280 for me?

00:44:17.960 All right,

00:44:18.440 here's the

00:44:18.760 other way

00:44:19.120 that I

00:44:19.440 could be

00:44:19.740 shadowbanned,

00:44:20.660 but it's

00:44:21.280 not necessarily

00:44:22.300 political.

00:44:24.500 Over on

00:44:25.140 Twitter,

00:44:25.820 Kristen Ruby,

00:44:27.820 Ruby Media,

00:44:29.800 she says

00:44:31.460 that she's

00:44:31.980 been provided

00:44:32.660 some source

00:44:34.300 code from

00:44:35.220 Twitter,

00:44:36.460 and she

00:44:36.780 published it.

00:44:38.080 So you

00:44:38.320 can actually

00:44:38.640 see the

00:44:39.040 source code

00:44:39.640 of at

00:44:40.700 least some

00:44:41.080 part of

00:44:41.440 the

00:44:41.540 algorithm.

00:44:42.760 Now,

00:44:43.320 what it

00:44:44.340 looks like

00:44:45.020 is a list

00:44:46.380 of words

00:44:47.680 that would

00:44:48.220 make your

00:44:49.020 account be

00:44:50.180 throttled back.

00:44:53.040 And it

00:44:53.480 looks like

00:44:53.840 words like

00:44:54.440 patriot would

00:44:56.060 flag you as

00:44:57.160 somebody who

00:44:59.100 might be

00:44:59.500 dangerous.

00:45:00.640 Because they

00:45:01.260 actually said

00:45:02.100 this in the

00:45:02.660 Twitter files,

00:45:03.240 that the

00:45:03.980 word patriot

00:45:04.540 might be

00:45:05.520 sort of a

00:45:05.980 coded message

00:45:06.760 for, you

00:45:07.180 know, grab

00:45:07.620 your guns and

00:45:08.300 start a

00:45:08.640 civil war,

00:45:09.860 calling people

00:45:10.420 patriots.

00:45:11.840 Now, that

00:45:12.860 has more to

00:45:15.660 do with the

00:45:16.680 bubble, doesn't

00:45:17.360 it?

00:45:18.200 If you spend

00:45:19.020 any time in

00:45:19.620 the Republican

00:45:20.160 bubble, we

00:45:21.800 call people,

00:45:22.840 I say we

00:45:23.440 because I spend

00:45:23.980 time in the

00:45:24.420 bubble, I'm

00:45:24.840 not Republican,

00:45:26.100 but don't we

00:45:26.960 use the word

00:45:27.920 patriot all the

00:45:28.960 time?

00:45:30.000 It's like an

00:45:30.800 ordinary word.

00:45:32.140 It's just sort

00:45:32.760 of a general

00:45:33.700 compliment for a

00:45:34.820 person who did

00:45:35.360 something good for

00:45:35.980 the country.

00:45:36.980 Like, it doesn't

00:45:37.820 even mean you

00:45:38.240 save somebody's

00:45:38.880 life.

00:45:39.660 Like, somebody

00:45:40.300 just does an

00:45:41.320 awesome thing,

00:45:42.460 you say, well,

00:45:42.900 there's a

00:45:43.180 patriot right

00:45:44.100 there.

00:45:45.160 The remains of

00:45:46.760 a Vietnam 0.86

00:45:47.560 veteran who

00:45:48.780 was just

00:45:49.240 discovered, the

00:45:50.520 remains were,

00:45:51.660 were just

00:45:52.220 flown back to

00:45:53.940 the United

00:45:54.320 States.

00:45:54.780 And I was

00:45:58.140 going to make

00:45:58.440 some point

00:45:58.900 about that,

00:45:59.440 but I forget

00:46:00.520 what it was.

00:46:01.840 All right.

00:46:02.700 So, now, I

00:46:03.780 would like some

00:46:04.920 confirmation that

00:46:06.100 Kristen Ruby's

00:46:07.580 source is to

00:46:09.580 be trusted.

00:46:11.420 I believe, she

00:46:12.440 believes that the

00:46:14.200 material is real,

00:46:16.360 and it looks

00:46:17.520 real, but it

00:46:18.660 also looks a

00:46:19.480 little too on

00:46:20.020 the nose.

00:46:22.680 It looks a

00:46:23.340 little too on

00:46:23.740 the nose.

00:46:23.960 Are you

00:46:24.520 saying the

00:46:24.880 hoax is a

00:46:25.460 keyword?

00:46:26.880 Did you look

00:46:27.460 at the, I

00:46:28.620 didn't see it.

00:46:30.220 Was that

00:46:30.700 true?

00:46:32.020 I need a

00:46:32.760 confirmation.

00:46:33.480 Was hoax one

00:46:34.660 of the

00:46:34.880 keywords?

00:46:38.960 It's a

00:46:39.500 2019 story?

00:46:43.440 Huh.

00:46:44.000 Okay.

00:46:44.520 So, I guess,

00:46:45.140 here's my

00:46:45.600 overall comment

00:46:46.580 about the

00:46:47.740 alleged secret

00:46:49.560 code.

00:46:50.040 I don't find

00:46:51.880 it credible.

00:46:53.960 I don't find

00:46:55.620 it credible.

00:46:57.460 Now, I

00:46:59.020 think that

00:46:59.640 Kristen Ruby

00:47:00.640 probably does

00:47:01.700 find it

00:47:02.120 credible.

00:47:03.260 You know,

00:47:03.400 she's closer

00:47:04.000 to the

00:47:04.320 source.

00:47:05.280 But, you

00:47:06.240 know, we

00:47:06.480 don't know

00:47:06.840 what she

00:47:07.120 knows, right?

00:47:08.300 She knows

00:47:09.020 what she

00:47:09.300 knows, and

00:47:09.740 we know

00:47:10.080 what we

00:47:10.340 know.

00:47:10.800 So, our

00:47:11.700 assessment of

00:47:12.680 the credibility

00:47:13.240 could be

00:47:13.920 different.

00:47:15.220 My assessment

00:47:15.960 is I don't

00:47:16.560 know her

00:47:16.960 personally, and

00:47:18.220 I don't know

00:47:18.640 who gave

00:47:18.960 her the

00:47:19.160 data, and

00:47:20.160 it's a

00:47:20.340 little too

00:47:20.720 perfect, a

00:47:21.740 little too

00:47:22.000 on the nose.

00:47:23.540 So, on

00:47:24.360 that basis,

00:47:25.320 that's a

00:47:25.880 wait and

00:47:26.160 see.

00:47:27.380 It feels, I

00:47:28.800 don't, I

00:47:29.960 just, I

00:47:30.440 don't trust

00:47:30.880 it yet.

00:47:32.100 Okay?

00:47:35.380 Here's a

00:47:36.100 tweet from

00:47:36.940 Kara Swisher,

00:47:38.740 and we'll

00:47:39.480 talk about

00:47:39.900 this first.

00:47:40.360 Here's the

00:47:40.640 tweet.

00:47:41.400 She says,

00:47:42.180 even if it

00:47:43.500 costs a lot

00:47:43.940 of money in

00:47:44.280 the interim,

00:47:44.980 having a

00:47:45.440 powerful media

00:47:46.200 property has

00:47:47.040 been the

00:47:47.540 wet dream

00:47:48.400 of the

00:47:48.780 aggrieved

00:47:49.280 tech bro

00:47:50.060 set for

00:47:50.720 a while.

00:47:51.580 They hated

00:47:52.140 it when

00:47:52.580 the once

00:47:53.040 slavish

00:47:53.960 reporters

00:47:54.500 started to

00:47:55.500 question their

00:47:56.160 hegonomy,

00:47:57.560 hegemony,

00:47:59.060 hegemony.

00:48:01.460 I hate 0.88

00:48:02.360 people who 0.76

00:48:02.940 write words

00:48:03.660 that I have

00:48:05.020 to say out

00:48:05.520 loud.

00:48:07.660 Hegemony.

00:48:10.600 All right.

00:48:11.640 Question their

00:48:12.320 hegemony,

00:48:13.520 hegemony,

00:48:14.220 and their

00:48:14.660 persistent

00:48:15.680 victim mentality

00:48:16.840 has only

00:48:17.340 gotten worse.

00:48:18.540 Persistent

00:48:19.060 victim mentality.

00:48:20.820 Do you

00:48:21.140 think that

00:48:21.640 Elon Musk

00:48:22.260 has a

00:48:22.800 persistent

00:48:23.300 victim

00:48:23.840 mentality?

00:48:32.000 Hegemony? 0.59

00:48:33.240 Hegemony? 0.59

00:48:33.960 Or is it

00:48:34.300 hegomony?

00:48:35.520 Is the

00:48:35.940 G a J? 1.00

00:48:38.160 It's a

00:48:38.960 J, right?

00:48:40.400 Hegemony? 0.59

00:48:42.440 Hegemony.

00:48:44.060 Is that

00:48:44.320 good?

00:48:44.520 Give me

00:48:45.520 a thumbs

00:48:46.040 up.

00:48:46.980 Hegemony.

00:48:48.340 Yes or no?

00:48:50.180 Hegemony? 0.59

00:48:51.480 You're saying

00:48:52.160 no?

00:48:53.100 I still

00:48:53.400 hegemony.

00:48:57.520 No?

00:49:01.640 All right.

00:49:02.400 Well,

00:49:03.600 let's put a

00:49:04.640 pin in that

00:49:05.140 and get back

00:49:05.580 to it.

00:49:06.900 All right.

00:49:07.560 Here's my

00:49:08.040 take on

00:49:09.040 Kara Swisher.

00:49:10.240 Now,

00:49:11.600 I don't

00:49:12.100 know her

00:49:12.340 personally

00:49:12.700 and I

00:49:13.680 don't want

00:49:13.960 to make

00:49:14.180 this like

00:49:14.620 a personal

00:49:15.040 comment.

00:49:15.980 So I'm

00:49:16.420 going to

00:49:16.500 make a

00:49:16.860 general

00:49:17.300 comment

00:49:17.820 about

00:49:18.760 people

00:49:19.160 and maybe

00:49:20.400 she's an 0.96

00:49:21.160 example of

00:49:21.760 it,

00:49:21.980 but we

00:49:22.300 won't make

00:49:22.700 this

00:49:22.880 personal,

00:49:23.440 okay?

00:49:23.800 So it's

00:49:24.100 not about

00:49:24.440 her.

00:49:25.360 It's a

00:49:26.060 pattern that

00:49:26.680 I notice.

00:49:28.240 And the

00:49:28.560 pattern is

00:49:29.180 I wonder

00:49:31.680 if the

00:49:32.040 problem

00:49:32.400 with

00:49:32.880 Twitter

00:49:34.400 is just 0.76

00:49:35.120 narcissists.

00:49:35.860 I wonder

00:49:37.920 if it's

00:49:38.220 just that.

00:49:40.880 You know,

00:49:41.160 surely there

00:49:42.260 are bots

00:49:42.880 and trolls

00:49:43.360 and stuff

00:49:43.900 and that's

00:49:44.400 bad too.

00:49:45.300 But in

00:49:45.780 terms of

00:49:46.220 the really

00:49:46.680 ugly part

00:49:47.420 of the

00:49:47.660 internet,

00:49:49.100 it's not

00:49:49.500 really the

00:49:49.900 bots because

00:49:51.320 you can

00:49:51.920 usually identify

00:49:52.640 them.

00:49:53.220 It's sort

00:49:53.740 of people

00:49:56.160 who,

00:49:57.280 well,

00:49:57.660 let's put it

00:49:58.060 this way.

00:49:58.880 One of the

00:49:59.560 ways you

00:49:59.880 would identify

00:50:00.500 a narcissist

00:50:01.100 is that they

00:50:02.920 do projection,

00:50:03.900 right?

00:50:04.100 So if 0.70

00:50:05.760 you murder 1.00

00:50:06.380 a baby, 0.99

00:50:07.560 if you're 0.95

00:50:08.480 a narcissist, 0.77

00:50:09.240 you would

00:50:09.580 accuse the

00:50:10.080 first person

00:50:10.620 who catches

00:50:11.000 you of

00:50:11.400 murdering a 0.99

00:50:11.900 baby. 1.00

00:50:13.000 And you'd

00:50:13.240 be like,

00:50:13.640 what?

00:50:14.320 Like,

00:50:14.740 I haven't

00:50:15.220 even been

00:50:15.500 near a

00:50:15.780 baby.

00:50:16.640 And it's

00:50:17.340 the complete 0.92

00:50:18.500 ridiculousness 0.97

00:50:19.600 of the 0.90

00:50:19.960 projection that

00:50:21.360 identifies it

00:50:22.100 as a

00:50:22.400 narcissist

00:50:22.780 thing.

00:50:23.660 Because it's

00:50:24.540 common in

00:50:25.200 politics for

00:50:25.880 people to

00:50:26.580 say, oh,

00:50:26.920 you did

00:50:27.220 it too.

00:50:28.060 That's not

00:50:28.520 what I'm

00:50:28.760 talking about.

00:50:29.800 When people

00:50:30.320 say you

00:50:30.760 did it too,

00:50:32.240 usually you

00:50:32.840 did.

00:50:34.100 That's

00:50:34.420 completely

00:50:34.820 different.

00:50:35.660 In

00:50:35.900 politics,

00:50:36.680 you did

00:50:37.120 do it

00:50:37.460 too.

00:50:38.220 You did.

00:50:39.260 That's not

00:50:39.740 gaslighting.

00:50:40.880 That's just

00:50:41.440 calling it

00:50:42.360 out what

00:50:42.580 happened.

00:50:43.500 The gaslighters

00:50:44.520 are the ones

00:50:45.080 who call you

00:50:46.200 out for

00:50:46.520 something only

00:50:47.440 they did.

00:50:48.680 You didn't

00:50:49.040 do anything.

00:50:49.960 You weren't

00:50:50.280 involved in

00:50:50.800 any way.

00:50:52.120 And they'll

00:50:52.500 still say you

00:50:53.400 did it.

00:50:54.900 Now,

00:50:55.180 what's that

00:50:55.500 sound like

00:50:56.000 when Kara

00:50:56.500 Swisher says

00:50:57.180 that Elon

00:50:57.640 Musk has 0.97

00:50:59.360 developed some

00:51:00.060 kind of victim

00:51:00.760 mentality?

00:51:01.380 Is that

00:51:03.280 what you

00:51:03.540 see?

00:51:04.740 Do you

00:51:05.820 see Elon

00:51:06.340 Musk acting

00:51:07.460 like a

00:51:07.860 victim?

00:51:09.600 I don't

00:51:10.300 see that.

00:51:12.360 I think

00:51:13.140 he's acting

00:51:13.640 like a

00:51:14.340 a

00:51:16.440 he's acting

00:51:18.440 like a

00:51:19.380 patriot.

00:51:22.780 he's acting

00:51:26.900 like a

00:51:27.420 patriot.

00:51:29.020 Like,

00:51:29.800 if you

00:51:30.980 had his

00:51:32.280 money,

00:51:33.920 what would

00:51:34.540 it look

00:51:34.860 like if

00:51:35.420 you wanted

00:51:35.720 to do

00:51:36.040 the most

00:51:36.680 patriot

00:51:37.500 thing?

00:51:38.060 I won't

00:51:38.300 say patriotic.

00:51:39.740 Do the

00:51:40.160 most patriot

00:51:40.860 thing.

00:51:41.680 He's doing

00:51:42.120 it.

00:51:43.020 He's doing

00:51:43.420 it right

00:51:43.660 now.

00:51:44.140 The most

00:51:44.700 patriot

00:51:45.520 thing you

00:51:45.980 could do

00:51:46.420 is to

00:51:47.420 put your

00:51:48.060 entire life

00:51:48.860 on the

00:51:49.140 line for

00:51:50.060 freedom of

00:51:50.640 speech in

00:51:51.020 America.

00:51:51.360 America.

00:51:52.080 He's risking

00:51:52.980 his life

00:51:53.580 to return

00:51:54.900 our freedom

00:51:55.380 of speech.

00:51:57.900 Does that

00:51:58.660 sound like

00:51:59.120 a victim?

00:52:00.640 What would

00:52:01.640 the left

00:52:02.560 say about

00:52:03.080 the founding

00:52:03.700 fathers,

00:52:04.980 just to

00:52:05.280 keep it

00:52:05.640 sexist?

00:52:06.720 The founders

00:52:07.460 of the

00:52:07.760 country who

00:52:09.240 decided to

00:52:10.180 stage a

00:52:11.160 revolution,

00:52:12.460 did they

00:52:13.020 do a

00:52:13.320 revolution

00:52:13.780 because they 0.86

00:52:15.160 were whiny 0.85

00:52:16.260 people who

00:52:17.100 had some

00:52:17.420 kind of

00:52:17.780 victim

00:52:18.080 mentality?

00:52:19.700 Well,

00:52:20.060 sort of.

00:52:21.260 Yeah.

00:52:21.360 The founders

00:52:22.200 believed they

00:52:22.860 were victims

00:52:23.420 of Great

00:52:24.120 Britain,

00:52:25.100 and so

00:52:25.460 they fought

00:52:25.880 back.

00:52:27.240 But is

00:52:27.640 the problem

00:52:28.080 that the

00:52:28.640 founders had

00:52:29.200 a victim

00:52:29.580 mentality?

00:52:31.100 Is that a

00:52:32.240 good description

00:52:32.840 of the

00:52:33.160 problem?

00:52:34.720 No.

00:52:35.620 They were

00:52:36.000 actually 1.00

00:52:36.520 fucking 1.00

00:52:37.080 victims. 1.00

00:52:39.420 If you

00:52:40.180 are a 1.00

00:52:40.980 fucking 1.00

00:52:41.360 victim, 1.00

00:52:42.680 do you

00:52:43.240 know what

00:52:43.460 kind of

00:52:43.740 mentality

00:52:44.220 you might

00:52:44.720 have?

00:52:45.880 Maybe a

00:52:46.460 victim

00:52:46.680 mentality.

00:52:47.220 So I

00:52:49.960 think

00:52:50.180 Elon Musk

00:52:50.760 is just

00:52:51.140 somebody

00:52:51.420 who's in

00:52:51.720 the middle

00:52:51.980 of the

00:52:52.240 fight.

00:52:53.300 He's in

00:52:53.760 a cage

00:52:54.240 match for

00:52:55.860 freedom of

00:52:56.480 speech and

00:52:56.960 for his

00:52:57.280 own life and

00:52:58.600 reputation and

00:52:59.400 everything else.

00:53:00.180 So I don't

00:53:01.160 see somebody

00:53:01.700 who enters

00:53:02.720 the cage,

00:53:03.740 you know,

00:53:04.000 they go in

00:53:04.460 the octagon

00:53:05.080 voluntarily,

00:53:06.260 and then

00:53:06.760 suddenly it's

00:53:07.420 because they

00:53:07.780 have a

00:53:08.020 victim

00:53:08.260 mentality.

00:53:09.500 Does that

00:53:10.020 not look

00:53:10.400 like projection

00:53:11.020 to you?

00:53:11.500 Seriously?

00:53:14.420 I mean,

00:53:16.240 it doesn't

00:53:16.620 look like a

00:53:17.460 really classic

00:53:18.220 case, like a

00:53:19.060 really easily

00:53:19.700 identifiable case

00:53:20.760 of projection.

00:53:23.020 Because Elon

00:53:25.600 Musk is the 0.95

00:53:26.420 last person I

00:53:27.420 would call a

00:53:27.800 victim.

00:53:28.980 Now, what

00:53:29.860 about the

00:53:30.600 rest of us

00:53:31.240 who also

00:53:32.560 complain about

00:53:33.440 things that

00:53:34.060 the left

00:53:34.380 does?

00:53:35.780 Do you feel

00:53:36.380 you're complaining

00:53:37.100 from a victim

00:53:38.080 perspective,

00:53:39.520 or do you

00:53:40.760 feel like

00:53:41.380 you're just

00:53:41.880 a broom

00:53:42.400 who's

00:53:42.980 trying to

00:53:44.000 sweep the 0.99

00:53:44.460 shit off 1.00

00:53:44.840 the floor? 0.99

00:53:46.320 I'm not a

00:53:47.100 victim, I'm 1.00

00:53:47.680 a fucking 1.00

00:53:48.080 broom. 1.00

00:53:49.500 I'm a

00:53:50.100 broom.

00:53:53.420 I'm

00:53:53.900 sweeping the 0.57

00:53:54.480 dirt away.

00:53:55.900 Like, that

00:53:56.220 doesn't make

00:53:56.620 me a victim.

00:53:57.620 That makes

00:53:58.000 me a guy

00:53:58.580 with a

00:53:58.860 broom who

00:53:59.340 wants to

00:53:59.660 clean a

00:53:59.980 house.

00:54:01.820 The whole

00:54:03.320 victim mentality

00:54:04.240 is exactly

00:54:05.660 where their

00:54:06.560 power base

00:54:07.780 comes from,

00:54:08.320 right?

00:54:09.160 Their power

00:54:09.700 base comes

00:54:10.300 from where

00:54:11.200 such victims

00:54:11.800 you have

00:54:12.140 to give

00:54:12.700 us more

00:54:13.060 stuff.

00:54:14.240 So if

00:54:14.880 you take

00:54:15.300 away their

00:54:15.820 victimhood,

00:54:16.800 then they're

00:54:17.340 weaponless.

00:54:18.300 So they

00:54:18.740 have to do

00:54:19.120 projection to

00:54:20.720 make it look

00:54:21.180 like it's

00:54:21.540 something happening

00:54:22.160 on both

00:54:22.580 sides.

00:54:23.740 It so

00:54:24.220 isn't

00:54:24.580 happening on

00:54:25.140 both sides.

00:54:26.280 Now, I'm

00:54:28.060 not so much

00:54:28.600 in the bag

00:54:29.200 for the

00:54:30.780 right that I

00:54:32.260 wouldn't tell

00:54:32.740 you it's

00:54:33.060 happening on

00:54:33.540 both sides

00:54:34.040 if it is.

00:54:35.100 Because this

00:54:35.600 narrative poisoning

00:54:36.400 thing, I

00:54:36.820 started off the

00:54:37.780 stream by

00:54:38.780 saying, it's

00:54:39.640 the same.

00:54:40.660 It's coming

00:54:41.000 from different

00:54:41.480 places, but

00:54:42.680 the narrative

00:54:43.100 poisoning is

00:54:44.100 getting us

00:54:44.500 all.

00:54:45.060 So is the

00:54:45.860 Hitler narrative

00:54:47.300 poisoning.

00:54:48.040 It's assault.

00:54:49.420 There's nobody.

00:54:50.660 But this is

00:54:51.720 the case, the

00:54:53.220 projection, it

00:54:54.780 does look like

00:54:55.560 that's on one

00:54:56.480 side.

00:54:58.020 And what

00:54:59.480 would be

00:54:59.760 another classic

00:55:03.360 tell for a

00:55:05.380 narcissist? 0.56

00:55:06.440 It's gaslighting.

00:55:07.280 gaslighting is

00:55:10.440 not just

00:55:11.480 telling you a

00:55:13.180 lie.

00:55:14.520 People would

00:55:15.360 confuse that.

00:55:16.880 Gaslighting is

00:55:17.560 when you tell

00:55:18.060 somebody a

00:55:18.540 lie, but

00:55:19.840 it's such an

00:55:21.560 obvious lie

00:55:22.580 that if you

00:55:23.820 could convince

00:55:24.420 them to

00:55:24.780 believe the

00:55:25.800 most obvious

00:55:26.460 lie in the

00:55:27.060 world, they 1.00

00:55:28.240 would have to

00:55:28.700 assume that

00:55:29.120 they were 0.94

00:55:29.360 crazy to

00:55:30.860 get there.

00:55:32.140 Like, actually

00:55:32.820 think you're 0.98

00:55:33.340 crazy. 0.99

00:55:33.700 Now, does 0.97

00:55:36.860 the left

00:55:38.640 gaslight, or

00:55:40.780 do they just

00:55:41.220 have a

00:55:41.500 different

00:55:41.720 narrative?

00:55:44.680 To me, it

00:55:45.400 looks like

00:55:45.740 gaslighting,

00:55:46.800 because they're

00:55:47.620 actually telling

00:55:48.320 the right that 0.99

00:55:48.880 they're crazy,

00:55:50.320 like, actually 0.98

00:55:50.980 literally.

00:55:52.580 Now, when you

00:55:53.240 say that somebody

00:55:53.800 has developed

00:55:54.280 some kind of

00:55:54.960 victim mentality,

00:55:56.300 you're saying

00:55:56.860 that's a mental 0.54

00:55:57.440 illness, wouldn't 0.94

00:55:58.000 you say?

00:55:58.780 A victim

00:55:59.340 mentality would

00:56:01.220 be, you know,

00:56:01.880 a low form

00:56:03.180 of mental

00:56:03.540 illness. 0.73

00:56:04.900 So here it

00:56:05.380 is.

00:56:06.040 Here's Kara

00:56:06.560 Swisher,

00:56:08.040 using projection

00:56:09.600 and gaslighting,

00:56:12.760 and one tweet.

00:56:14.600 Now, I don't

00:56:15.220 think this is

00:56:15.980 a one-off,

00:56:18.140 and I don't

00:56:18.780 think it's

00:56:19.200 like a comment

00:56:19.980 about, you

00:56:20.720 know, Kara

00:56:21.080 Swisher.

00:56:21.980 I think it's a

00:56:22.940 pattern that I

00:56:23.580 keep seeing.

00:56:25.360 It just looks

00:56:26.240 like purely

00:56:26.840 narcissistic

00:56:27.620 behavior,

00:56:28.020 and we

00:56:31.900 need to be

00:56:32.360 able to

00:56:32.640 identify these

00:56:33.380 people because

00:56:35.100 there are two

00:56:35.560 kinds of people

00:56:36.240 you never want

00:56:37.100 to respond to

00:56:37.900 because it

00:56:38.880 just can't

00:56:39.360 work.

00:56:41.740 One is

00:56:42.340 somebody who's

00:56:42.820 gaslighting you

00:56:43.600 and is a 1.00

00:56:44.060 narcissist.

00:56:45.300 Do you know

00:56:45.780 that every

00:56:46.280 expert on

00:56:46.860 narcissism,

00:56:47.820 do you know

00:56:48.940 what the

00:56:49.320 professional

00:56:52.660 advice is if

00:56:54.640 a narcissist

00:56:55.200 is in your

00:56:56.000 environment?

00:56:56.680 run.

00:56:59.880 Yeah, yeah.

00:57:00.820 There's no

00:57:01.360 expert who

00:57:02.060 says you

00:57:02.440 can deal

00:57:02.860 with them

00:57:03.200 successfully.

00:57:04.220 None.

00:57:04.980 Nobody.

00:57:05.720 There's no

00:57:06.200 expert who

00:57:06.760 says you

00:57:07.160 should hang

00:57:07.580 around them

00:57:08.040 even for

00:57:08.480 one minute.

00:57:09.700 You should

00:57:10.160 just get

00:57:10.700 away.

00:57:12.180 And you

00:57:12.900 can't really

00:57:13.560 on social

00:57:14.020 media because

00:57:14.620 they can

00:57:14.880 follow you

00:57:15.280 and stuff.

00:57:15.840 So my

00:57:16.200 recommendation

00:57:16.560 is that when

00:57:17.440 you run

00:57:17.760 into narcissists

00:57:19.080 on social

00:57:19.620 media, you

00:57:20.140 don't engage.

00:57:21.620 As soon as

00:57:22.200 you see the

00:57:22.640 projection or the

00:57:23.560 gaslighting,

00:57:24.720 just block

00:57:25.200 them or 1.00

00:57:26.140 beat them.

00:57:27.520 The second

00:57:28.860 group that

00:57:30.620 there's no

00:57:31.160 point in

00:57:31.540 engaging is

00:57:32.260 the people

00:57:32.540 who are

00:57:32.760 clearly

00:57:33.240 experiencing

00:57:34.300 narrative

00:57:34.800 poisoning.

00:57:36.940 Narrative

00:57:37.500 poisoning, by

00:57:38.340 its definition

00:57:40.040 that I've

00:57:40.480 given it, is

00:57:41.800 the thing that

00:57:42.280 doesn't let

00:57:43.080 you see

00:57:43.740 things clearly.

00:57:44.820 It doesn't

00:57:45.220 allow you to

00:57:45.760 think clearly.

00:57:46.960 So reasoning

00:57:47.440 with somebody

00:57:48.140 who's in a

00:57:48.680 state of not

00:57:49.480 being able to

00:57:49.960 think clearly

00:57:50.500 is a complete

00:57:51.340 waste of time.

00:57:52.360 You're not

00:57:52.680 going to

00:57:52.880 convince them.

00:57:53.300 So I

00:57:55.020 think what

00:57:55.420 I'm going

00:57:55.620 to start

00:57:55.880 doing is

00:57:56.300 when people

00:57:57.700 come at

00:57:58.260 me with

00:57:59.320 what is

00:57:59.680 obviously a

00:58:00.500 case of

00:58:00.800 narrative

00:58:01.140 poisoning,

00:58:01.940 there's just

00:58:02.420 no critical

00:58:03.200 thinking at

00:58:03.760 all, I'm

00:58:04.660 just going to

00:58:05.060 label it

00:58:05.600 narrative

00:58:06.180 poisoning and

00:58:07.020 not respond

00:58:07.600 again.

00:58:08.620 Just two

00:58:09.120 words,

00:58:09.660 narrative

00:58:09.960 poisoning.

00:58:11.240 I just call

00:58:11.900 it out every

00:58:12.340 time I see

00:58:12.720 it.

00:58:13.660 Now I don't

00:58:13.940 know if

00:58:14.120 that'll work,

00:58:14.960 I'm just

00:58:15.300 telling you

00:58:16.040 something I

00:58:16.420 might practice

00:58:17.740 or a

00:58:18.680 test nail. 1.00

00:58:21.560 All right,

00:58:22.480 Barry Weiss

00:58:23.340 did another

00:58:23.820 dump yesterday

00:58:24.480 about the

00:58:25.060 Twitter files.

00:58:26.280 The funniest

00:58:26.760 thing was

00:58:27.380 that there

00:58:28.540 were definitely

00:58:29.460 some dissenters

00:58:30.460 within Twitter

00:58:31.160 who were

00:58:32.440 saying things

00:58:33.120 like, hey,

00:58:34.020 maybe we're

00:58:34.740 stomping on

00:58:35.540 freedom of

00:58:36.120 speech a

00:58:36.520 little bit

00:58:36.840 too much

00:58:37.280 here, or

00:58:37.820 worse to

00:58:38.320 that effect.

00:58:39.200 One of the

00:58:39.740 prominent

00:58:40.120 dissenters

00:58:40.860 was somebody

00:58:42.000 who said,

00:58:43.140 quote, in

00:58:43.600 one of the

00:58:44.980 messages,

00:58:46.320 maybe because

00:58:47.220 I'm from

00:58:47.640 China, said

00:58:48.500 one employee

00:58:49.060 on January

00:58:49.540 7th, I

00:58:50.540 deeply

00:58:50.840 understand how

00:58:51.640 censorship can

00:58:52.400 destroy the

00:58:53.000 public

00:58:53.220 conversation.

00:58:57.920 Only the

00:58:58.660 guy who

00:58:59.200 was raised

00:59:00.740 in China

00:59:01.340 could see

00:59:02.280 what was

00:59:02.620 happening.

00:59:03.680 Do you

00:59:03.880 know why?

00:59:05.360 Do you

00:59:05.800 know why the

00:59:06.120 guy who

00:59:06.480 was raised

00:59:06.840 in China

00:59:07.440 could see

00:59:08.700 the field

00:59:09.160 clearly?

00:59:11.120 No

00:59:11.600 narrative

00:59:11.940 poisoning.

00:59:13.480 Yeah, no

00:59:13.900 narrative

00:59:14.220 poisoning.

00:59:15.080 I don't

00:59:15.320 know why.

00:59:16.280 Maybe he

00:59:16.680 didn't follow

00:59:17.120 the same

00:59:17.500 news, maybe

00:59:18.240 because his

00:59:18.760 background was

00:59:19.640 bigger.

00:59:21.720 Maybe he

00:59:22.280 had more

00:59:22.560 exposure to

00:59:23.180 people on

00:59:23.560 the right.

00:59:24.380 I don't

00:59:24.560 know.

00:59:25.600 But you

00:59:26.220 could see

00:59:26.760 that this

00:59:27.780 one individual

00:59:28.400 had no

00:59:29.080 narrative

00:59:29.420 poisoning.

00:59:30.940 No narrative

00:59:31.500 poisoning at

00:59:32.060 all.

00:59:32.420 So it's

00:59:32.680 possible.

00:59:35.060 Don't be a

00:59:35.880 racist, 0.84

00:59:37.500 Greg. 0.94

00:59:39.080 Goodbye, 0.99

00:59:39.500 racist. 0.87

00:59:42.900 That's not

00:59:43.640 cool.

00:59:44.880 We want

00:59:45.320 none of that

00:59:45.840 on this

00:59:46.260 channel.

00:59:48.640 All right.

00:59:52.620 Here are

00:59:53.160 some of the

00:59:53.540 things that

00:59:53.940 the Twitter

00:59:54.600 people said

00:59:55.260 according to

00:59:55.720 the Twitter

00:59:56.020 files.

00:59:56.880 We have

00:59:57.320 to do

00:59:57.580 the right

00:59:57.940 thing and

00:59:58.500 ban this

00:59:58.920 account.

00:59:59.940 So that's

01:00:00.360 how they

01:00:00.640 were talking.

01:00:01.940 They were

01:00:02.180 talking about

01:00:02.540 doing the

01:00:02.920 right thing.

01:00:03.920 Nobody ever

01:00:04.660 said,

01:00:05.900 Democrats

01:00:06.360 rule,

01:00:07.380 got to

01:00:07.800 stop the

01:00:08.160 Republicans.

01:00:09.460 It was

01:00:09.980 always about

01:00:10.380 doing the

01:00:10.720 right thing.

01:00:12.020 And I

01:00:12.380 really think

01:00:12.800 they believed

01:00:13.160 it.

01:00:15.220 And somebody

01:00:15.700 else said,

01:00:16.240 quote,

01:00:16.500 pretty obvious

01:00:17.120 he's going

01:00:17.540 to try to

01:00:18.040 thread the

01:00:18.520 needle of

01:00:19.500 incitement

01:00:20.100 without

01:00:20.480 violating the

01:00:21.320 rules.

01:00:22.160 So here's

01:00:22.640 someone who

01:00:23.040 thought it

01:00:23.460 was completely

01:00:24.060 obvious that

01:00:25.540 Trump was

01:00:26.240 involved with

01:00:26.980 inciting

01:00:27.440 violence.

01:00:28.640 Like,

01:00:28.920 it's just

01:00:29.180 obvious.

01:00:30.180 Now,

01:00:30.500 that's

01:00:30.680 narrative

01:00:31.000 poisoning,

01:00:31.580 right?

01:00:32.040 Clearly.

01:00:33.180 That's

01:00:33.460 obvious

01:00:33.960 narrative

01:00:34.400 poisoning.

01:00:35.100 Now,

01:00:35.360 you could

01:00:35.580 say maybe

01:00:36.040 it happened,

01:00:36.520 maybe it

01:00:36.860 wouldn't.

01:00:37.660 But to

01:00:38.020 say that

01:00:38.360 it's obvious

01:00:38.900 he's going

01:00:39.520 to try to

01:00:39.920 incite

01:00:40.240 violence,

01:00:41.460 it's not

01:00:42.040 obvious.

01:00:44.340 Not only

01:00:45.040 is it not

01:00:45.380 obvious,

01:00:45.720 it wasn't

01:00:46.040 even true.

01:00:47.080 There was

01:00:47.380 plenty of

01:00:47.860 counterfactuals

01:00:48.760 in his

01:00:49.300 tweets.

01:00:54.200 And then

01:00:54.840 a few

01:00:55.100 minutes later

01:00:55.580 somebody on

01:00:56.340 the Twitter

01:00:56.760 or a

01:00:57.260 scaled

01:00:57.520 enforcement

01:00:58.020 team

01:00:58.500 suggested

01:00:59.500 that

01:00:59.740 Trump's

01:00:59.980 tweets

01:01:00.220 may have

01:01:00.720 violated

01:01:01.120 Twitter's

01:01:01.720 quote,

01:01:02.540 glorification

01:01:03.200 of

01:01:04.500 violence

01:01:04.880 policy

01:01:05.380 if you

01:01:06.440 interpreted

01:01:06.920 the phrase

01:01:07.520 American

01:01:08.080 patriots

01:01:08.700 to refer

01:01:09.460 to the

01:01:09.780 rioters.

01:01:11.820 So you

01:01:12.240 had to

01:01:12.580 interpret

01:01:13.420 something

01:01:13.880 in a

01:01:14.400 non-standard

01:01:15.200 way to

01:01:16.640 get you

01:01:17.000 within the

01:01:17.560 zip code

01:01:18.260 of something

01:01:19.580 that could 0.68

01:01:20.060 reasonably be

01:01:21.240 interpreted

01:01:21.740 as related

01:01:23.280 to,

01:01:24.440 given the

01:01:25.000 larger

01:01:25.300 context,

01:01:26.500 and all

01:01:26.900 the other

01:01:27.200 things he's

01:01:27.620 ever done.

01:01:28.760 If you

01:01:29.360 put them

01:01:29.620 all together

01:01:30.120 into this

01:01:32.160 lovely

01:01:32.480 tapestry,

01:01:33.740 you've got a

01:01:34.220 strong argument

01:01:34.940 for banning

01:01:35.580 them.

01:01:36.460 But you

01:01:36.880 can see that

01:01:37.360 they were

01:01:37.600 working hard

01:01:38.160 to do what

01:01:38.600 they thought

01:01:39.000 was going

01:01:39.660 to reduce

01:01:40.040 violence

01:01:40.460 and be

01:01:41.000 the right

01:01:41.280 thing.

01:01:42.580 And you

01:01:42.960 see they

01:01:43.360 were struggling.

01:01:45.800 Members of

01:01:46.460 the team

01:01:46.840 came to

01:01:47.340 quote,

01:01:48.020 view him

01:01:48.480 as the

01:01:48.940 leader of

01:01:49.360 a terrorist

01:01:49.880 group

01:01:50.340 responsible

01:01:51.360 for violence

01:01:52.120 and deaths

01:01:52.600 comparable

01:01:53.500 to the

01:01:54.120 Christchurch

01:01:55.060 shooter

01:01:55.880 or,

01:01:56.520 wait for

01:01:57.120 it,

01:01:57.760 or,

01:01:58.460 what do you

01:01:58.900 think will

01:01:59.160 be the

01:01:59.420 next word?

01:02:00.380 Comparable

01:02:00.740 to the

01:02:01.140 Christchurch

01:02:01.800 shooter

01:02:02.100 or,

01:02:04.780 Hitler. 0.57

01:02:05.500 Hitler. 0.57

01:02:07.240 In their

01:02:07.980 internal

01:02:08.600 communications,

01:02:11.160 they were

01:02:11.560 actually worried

01:02:12.440 that he was

01:02:12.820 basically

01:02:13.560 Hitler. 0.57

01:02:14.900 They actually

01:02:16.080 were worried

01:02:16.660 about that

01:02:17.020 in the real

01:02:17.580 world.

01:02:18.780 Now,

01:02:19.140 here's where

01:02:21.280 my big

01:02:21.760 aha came.

01:02:23.600 I never

01:02:24.480 knew if they

01:02:25.160 ever meant

01:02:25.640 that when

01:02:26.580 they do

01:02:26.840 the Hitler 0.95

01:02:27.200 thing.

01:02:28.460 Like,

01:02:28.800 I never

01:02:29.040 knew if

01:02:29.740 that was

01:02:29.980 serious.

01:02:31.160 It just

01:02:31.500 seemed like

01:02:31.920 it was

01:02:32.180 hyperbole

01:02:32.820 and it's

01:02:33.440 part of

01:02:33.720 the debating

01:02:34.880 process.

01:02:35.600 But I

01:02:35.800 didn't think

01:02:36.060 they believed

01:02:36.580 it.

01:02:37.700 It turns

01:02:38.040 out they

01:02:38.340 believe it.

01:02:39.580 They actually

01:02:40.340 believe that

01:02:40.960 there's a

01:02:41.820 Hitler-like 0.97

01:02:42.660 threat or

01:02:43.320 that Trump

01:02:43.940 is.

01:02:44.940 They actually

01:02:45.800 believe it.

01:02:47.220 Wow.

01:02:49.060 So,

01:02:50.320 that's what

01:02:51.340 cued me

01:02:52.440 into this.

01:02:53.780 Because for

01:02:54.340 them to

01:02:54.680 actually believe

01:02:55.700 that and

01:02:56.920 not be

01:02:57.340 hyperbole,

01:02:58.840 there's some

01:02:59.300 kind of

01:02:59.800 industrial,

01:03:00.980 commercial,

01:03:02.160 weaponized,

01:03:02.820 persuasion

01:03:04.560 in the

01:03:05.020 mix.

01:03:06.060 You don't

01:03:06.580 get there

01:03:06.960 on your

01:03:07.240 own.

01:03:08.420 Like,

01:03:08.580 I don't

01:03:08.900 think you

01:03:09.220 drift into

01:03:10.040 thinking that

01:03:10.780 your president

01:03:11.800 who was

01:03:12.120 elected by

01:03:12.780 the citizens

01:03:13.860 who were,

01:03:14.420 you know,

01:03:15.120 these perfectly

01:03:16.140 reasonable

01:03:16.620 citizens around

01:03:17.420 you elected

01:03:19.520 Hitler and 0.80

01:03:20.100 didn't notice.

01:03:21.560 Like,

01:03:22.060 that's what

01:03:22.380 they believe.

01:03:23.660 That 40% of

01:03:24.560 the country

01:03:24.940 voted for

01:03:25.500 Hitler,

01:03:26.360 guy Hitler, 0.76

01:03:27.600 didn't

01:03:27.960 notice.

01:03:29.020 Didn't

01:03:29.320 notice.

01:03:31.160 That's what

01:03:31.880 they actually

01:03:32.280 believe.

01:03:33.340 Now,

01:03:33.820 that's

01:03:34.260 mental

01:03:34.580 illness,

01:03:35.280 right?

01:03:36.600 What else

01:03:37.060 could it

01:03:37.280 be?

01:03:38.800 That's not

01:03:39.520 intelligence,

01:03:40.460 it's not

01:03:40.760 being uninformed.

01:03:42.660 That's a 0.98

01:03:43.300 mental illness,

01:03:44.180 but it's

01:03:44.660 not organic.

01:03:46.480 They were

01:03:46.920 not born

01:03:47.440 with this

01:03:47.960 specific form

01:03:48.880 of mental

01:03:49.260 illness.

01:03:50.040 They got

01:03:50.520 this from

01:03:51.180 somebody,

01:03:52.420 somebody who

01:03:53.380 knows how

01:03:53.760 to do it.

01:03:54.940 It's not

01:03:55.460 accidental.

01:03:55.940 well,

01:03:59.720 I think

01:04:00.020 I've got

01:04:01.140 a suggestion

01:04:01.700 for Elon

01:04:02.260 Musk.

01:04:04.580 The

01:04:05.080 Twitter

01:04:05.380 terms of

01:04:05.920 service

01:04:06.180 should be

01:04:06.660 upgraded.

01:04:07.380 The big

01:04:07.800 problem was

01:04:08.320 the Twitter

01:04:09.220 terms of

01:04:09.720 service

01:04:10.020 couldn't

01:04:10.780 cover all

01:04:11.840 the specific

01:04:13.180 weird

01:04:13.760 situations,

01:04:15.460 so it's

01:04:15.820 always hard

01:04:16.120 to write a

01:04:16.460 terms of

01:04:16.840 service that

01:04:17.280 covers

01:04:17.520 everything.

01:04:18.240 So here's

01:04:18.640 my little

01:04:18.980 suggestion to

01:04:19.700 just maybe

01:04:20.460 tighten up the

01:04:21.200 terms of

01:04:21.580 service.

01:04:21.840 So I

01:04:23.080 think it

01:04:23.300 should include

01:04:23.920 a clause

01:04:24.360 that says

01:04:24.780 you can be

01:04:26.040 banned from

01:04:26.580 Twitter if

01:04:27.540 the mainstream

01:04:28.260 media affects

01:04:29.120 Twitter employees

01:04:29.920 with narrative

01:04:30.460 poisoning until

01:04:31.680 they hallucinate

01:04:32.560 your role in

01:04:33.120 an insurrection.

01:04:35.020 So they

01:04:35.660 should just

01:04:35.960 put that in

01:04:36.480 there because

01:04:37.640 that was

01:04:38.400 what happened.

01:04:40.740 They were

01:04:41.380 brainwashed to

01:04:42.140 the point where

01:04:42.660 they hallucinated

01:04:43.560 an insurrection

01:04:44.840 and then they

01:04:45.660 banned Trump

01:04:46.120 over it.

01:04:47.680 Now,

01:04:48.480 if they

01:04:49.380 want to not

01:04:49.980 be in the

01:04:50.960 same position

01:04:51.560 again where

01:04:52.800 their terms

01:04:53.260 of service

01:04:53.680 don't cover

01:04:54.200 the exact

01:04:54.700 situation,

01:04:55.400 they should

01:04:55.640 just put

01:04:55.960 the exact

01:04:56.400 situation

01:04:56.920 in the

01:04:57.260 terms of

01:04:57.620 service.

01:04:58.360 If we

01:04:59.020 are hypnotized

01:04:59.820 into thinking

01:05:00.960 that somebody

01:05:01.480 is Hitler 0.88

01:05:01.880 or that

01:05:04.220 they're running

01:05:04.600 an insurrection,

01:05:06.380 that is

01:05:07.600 reason to

01:05:08.160 ban them

01:05:08.540 if we've

01:05:09.060 been hypnotized.

01:05:10.980 Why not

01:05:11.620 say what

01:05:11.940 it is?

01:05:13.660 That's

01:05:14.100 what it is.

01:05:15.360 Is there

01:05:15.880 any reason

01:05:16.260 that the

01:05:16.600 terms of

01:05:17.000 service

01:05:17.300 can't say

01:05:17.800 exactly what

01:05:18.540 it is?

01:05:19.120 If we

01:05:19.680 are brainwashed

01:05:20.360 into believing

01:05:20.900 you're

01:05:21.140 Hitler,

01:05:21.560 you can

01:05:22.180 be banned.

01:05:24.140 That's

01:05:24.700 literally

01:05:25.060 what it

01:05:25.460 is.

01:05:26.360 I'm not

01:05:26.740 adding

01:05:27.000 anything

01:05:27.360 weird.

01:05:28.400 That's

01:05:28.920 just a

01:05:29.640 good

01:05:30.060 description

01:05:30.680 of what

01:05:31.820 happened

01:05:32.200 and what

01:05:33.020 would happen

01:05:33.380 again.

01:05:34.120 There's

01:05:34.360 nothing to

01:05:34.760 stop it

01:05:35.060 from happening

01:05:35.440 again,

01:05:35.920 right?

01:05:36.520 What if

01:05:37.020 the next

01:05:37.380 president

01:05:37.800 is also

01:05:39.480 characterized

01:05:40.060 by whoever

01:05:40.800 is behind

01:05:41.980 the persuasion

01:05:42.600 as Hitler? 0.68

01:05:45.640 That

01:05:46.160 situation

01:05:46.660 is going

01:05:46.980 to come

01:05:47.200 up again

01:05:47.680 the very

01:05:48.740 next time

01:05:49.240 a Republican

01:05:49.760 gets elected

01:05:50.400 it's going

01:05:51.400 to come

01:05:51.640 up again.

01:05:52.840 So what

01:05:53.360 are the

01:05:53.700 social media

01:05:54.740 employees do

01:05:55.620 when they've

01:05:56.680 got the

01:05:57.060 what bad

01:05:57.900 luck to

01:05:58.260 have a

01:05:58.520 second

01:05:58.820 Hitler? 0.62

01:05:59.520 Oh my

01:05:59.760 God,

01:06:00.540 what bad

01:06:01.240 luck?

01:06:01.580 all right.

01:06:10.440 That,

01:06:11.120 ladies and 0.98

01:06:11.520 gentlemen,

01:06:13.420 concludes the

01:06:15.780 best live

01:06:16.340 stream you've

01:06:16.920 ever seen

01:06:17.360 on this

01:06:17.700 topic.

01:06:20.420 I'm pretty

01:06:21.240 sure that

01:06:23.360 the mainstream

01:06:23.880 media has

01:06:25.160 nothing on

01:06:25.740 me.

01:06:27.260 Although I

01:06:27.920 have to say

01:06:28.280 Tucker's show

01:06:28.920 is a whole

01:06:29.860 other level,

01:06:30.560 so I can't

01:06:31.280 really compete

01:06:31.720 with that.

01:06:33.040 But I feel

01:06:33.460 like I compete

01:06:34.100 with Don

01:06:34.940 Lemon.

01:06:36.660 If I were

01:06:37.340 to rank the

01:06:38.140 quality of my

01:06:39.100 live stream

01:06:39.700 compared to

01:06:40.500 other professionals,

01:06:42.640 I think I'd

01:06:43.440 say better

01:06:44.980 than most

01:06:45.640 of CNN.

01:06:47.760 Not better

01:06:48.540 than a lot

01:06:48.960 of stuff on

01:06:49.460 Fox.

01:06:49.980 They have

01:06:50.260 higher quality

01:06:51.280 talent,

01:06:51.820 I think.

01:06:56.760 But I

01:06:57.600 think my

01:06:57.960 live stream

01:06:58.460 is already

01:06:58.920 better than

01:06:59.860 80%

01:07:02.240 of the

01:07:03.040 content

01:07:04.480 in the

01:07:04.880 same space.

01:07:06.120 That would

01:07:06.680 be my

01:07:07.480 self-assessment.

01:07:10.920 Now,

01:07:11.420 part of it

01:07:11.800 is that I'm

01:07:12.440 not beholden

01:07:13.120 to anybody.

01:07:14.180 I'm not

01:07:14.720 running

01:07:15.020 pharma

01:07:15.360 commercials.

01:07:16.660 Actually,

01:07:17.220 they might

01:07:17.480 be on

01:07:17.740 YouTube,

01:07:18.140 but I

01:07:18.480 don't have

01:07:20.040 anything to

01:07:20.460 do with

01:07:20.660 that.

01:07:21.800 So I

01:07:23.680 don't have

01:07:24.040 to answer

01:07:24.360 to Murdoch.

01:07:25.740 I don't

01:07:26.080 have to

01:07:26.440 answer to

01:07:26.980 the CIA.

01:07:29.360 I don't

01:07:29.820 have to

01:07:30.100 answer to

01:07:30.500 a boss.

01:07:31.800 I just

01:07:32.100 don't have

01:07:32.320 to answer

01:07:32.640 to anybody.

01:07:33.840 So that's

01:07:34.420 got to be

01:07:34.720 an advantage.

01:07:38.540 You know,

01:07:39.080 here's a

01:07:39.400 question.

01:07:41.880 The Tim

01:07:43.040 Cash show,

01:07:43.700 I think,

01:07:44.000 is a great

01:07:44.400 production.

01:07:45.080 I think

01:07:45.320 Tim Poole

01:07:46.940 does an

01:07:47.340 amazing job

01:07:48.000 as an

01:07:48.320 entrepreneur,

01:07:49.240 and also

01:07:49.800 one of the

01:07:50.120 best examples

01:07:50.840 of a

01:07:51.480 talent stack.

01:07:52.540 Have I

01:07:52.860 ever mentioned

01:07:53.240 that before?

01:07:54.580 Tim Poole.

01:07:56.640 His talent

01:07:57.160 stack is all

01:07:58.260 the way from

01:07:58.800 he's got a

01:08:00.080 band and

01:08:00.640 he's got

01:08:00.920 musical talent.

01:08:01.960 He's very

01:08:02.320 good, by the

01:08:02.720 way.

01:08:02.900 I listened

01:08:03.160 to some

01:08:04.400 of his

01:08:04.660 music on

01:08:05.560 YouTube the

01:08:06.180 other day.

01:08:06.980 Very good.

01:08:07.960 Very good.

01:08:08.920 I was

01:08:09.320 surprised.

01:08:10.840 Surprised just

01:08:11.480 because he has

01:08:11.880 another job.

01:08:12.680 You don't

01:08:13.060 expect people

01:08:13.660 to be good

01:08:14.120 if they have

01:08:14.780 one other

01:08:15.140 job.

01:08:15.980 But he's

01:08:16.320 very good.

01:08:17.180 And he's

01:08:18.880 built a

01:08:19.440 sort of

01:08:20.800 newsy

01:08:21.700 opinion

01:08:22.020 site that

01:08:22.920 appears to

01:08:24.060 have

01:08:24.260 associates

01:08:25.180 and maybe

01:08:25.860 employees and

01:08:26.520 stuff.

01:08:27.360 So very

01:08:27.920 good.

01:08:28.360 Does a

01:08:28.600 great job.

01:08:29.380 But here's

01:08:29.640 the question.

01:08:30.980 Do you

01:08:31.240 like podcasts

01:08:32.280 with a

01:08:33.120 team of

01:08:34.600 people around

01:08:35.120 the table?

01:08:36.980 Do you

01:08:37.240 like it when

01:08:37.620 it's just

01:08:37.920 two people

01:08:38.440 like the

01:08:38.840 Lex Friedman

01:08:39.700 model?

01:08:40.600 Or do you

01:08:41.320 prefer it

01:08:41.740 when it's

01:08:42.020 one who

01:08:42.660 has something

01:08:43.060 to say,

01:08:43.760 like my

01:08:44.340 model?

01:08:45.320 Which of

01:08:45.800 the models

01:08:46.120 do you

01:08:46.380 like sort

01:08:47.400 of generically

01:08:48.080 the best?

01:08:50.800 Two people.

01:08:53.620 So mine's

01:08:54.320 kind of a

01:08:54.680 special case.

01:08:57.920 Two people

01:08:58.580 both.

01:08:59.100 Yeah, I

01:08:59.360 think they

01:08:59.640 all have a

01:08:59.980 place.

01:09:00.680 Probably

01:09:00.900 they all

01:09:01.120 have a

01:09:01.320 place.

01:09:04.520 When I

01:09:05.580 see a

01:09:06.060 group table

01:09:07.500 conversation,

01:09:08.980 I always

01:09:09.680 have the

01:09:10.000 following

01:09:10.280 feelings.

01:09:10.900 See if

01:09:11.120 anybody

01:09:11.400 can get

01:09:11.700 that.

01:09:11.900 And this

01:09:12.460 is a

01:09:12.960 persuasion

01:09:13.480 lesson for

01:09:14.020 you.

01:09:15.220 We only

01:09:15.980 evaluate

01:09:16.480 things,

01:09:17.480 anything,

01:09:18.520 compared to

01:09:19.060 other

01:09:19.240 things.

01:09:20.800 So if

01:09:22.640 I'm alone,

01:09:24.860 you're

01:09:25.160 comparing me

01:09:25.780 to maybe

01:09:26.260 other people

01:09:27.000 sort of

01:09:27.840 generically

01:09:28.780 who do

01:09:29.180 this.

01:09:29.920 But if

01:09:31.160 I were

01:09:31.420 sitting here

01:09:31.880 with,

01:09:32.220 let's say,

01:09:32.700 four people

01:09:33.300 around a

01:09:33.780 table,

01:09:34.960 and each

01:09:35.360 of us

01:09:35.600 were taking

01:09:36.060 some time

01:09:36.560 to talk,

01:09:38.400 wouldn't

01:09:38.880 you automatically

01:09:39.660 say,

01:09:40.560 okay,

01:09:40.860 I like

01:09:41.460 listening to

01:09:41.980 that one

01:09:42.460 and that

01:09:43.920 one,

01:09:44.260 but these

01:09:44.700 other two

01:09:45.200 I don't

01:09:45.500 like listening

01:09:46.000 to?

01:09:46.260 Wouldn't

01:09:47.780 you

01:09:47.980 automatically

01:09:49.080 hate it

01:09:49.800 when one

01:09:50.400 of the

01:09:50.680 four,

01:09:51.640 who in

01:09:52.180 your opinion

01:09:52.720 is the

01:09:53.360 least good

01:09:54.460 talker,

01:09:55.660 when they're

01:09:56.340 talking,

01:09:57.420 right?

01:09:58.120 And so it

01:09:59.000 feels like it

01:09:59.560 takes something

01:10:00.220 away,

01:10:01.000 but on the

01:10:01.720 other hand,

01:10:02.720 it might make

01:10:03.460 the ones you

01:10:04.140 like the best

01:10:04.860 seem better

01:10:05.920 by contrast.

01:10:06.940 So I'm not

01:10:07.440 sure what the

01:10:07.880 net is.

01:10:08.320 That's why I

01:10:08.740 asked.

01:10:09.540 I think

01:10:09.960 there's room

01:10:10.420 for all

01:10:10.940 those models,

01:10:12.440 but,

01:10:13.860 yeah.

01:10:14.120 That's

01:10:16.040 like when

01:10:16.420 I watched,

01:10:18.020 I have to

01:10:19.480 mention the

01:10:19.940 five.

01:10:20.860 Now the

01:10:21.360 five is a

01:10:22.740 completely

01:10:23.100 different model

01:10:24.700 than anything

01:10:25.400 else.

01:10:26.240 Because in

01:10:26.640 the five,

01:10:27.120 they can talk

01:10:27.640 over each

01:10:28.060 other.

01:10:29.160 You know,

01:10:29.320 there's an

01:10:29.820 interaction,

01:10:30.480 you don't

01:10:30.720 know where

01:10:30.920 it's going

01:10:31.160 to go.

01:10:31.740 But the

01:10:32.100 other thing

01:10:32.500 that the

01:10:32.800 five does

01:10:33.460 is they

01:10:34.560 give you

01:10:35.400 usually five

01:10:37.120 good

01:10:37.420 personalities.

01:10:39.000 That's why

01:10:39.500 it's the

01:10:39.760 five,

01:10:40.480 right?

01:10:40.660 It's not

01:10:40.960 like one

01:10:41.360 good person

01:10:41.880 and four

01:10:42.460 guests.

01:10:42.840 The Fox

01:10:45.000 producers are

01:10:45.820 the best

01:10:46.180 in the

01:10:46.480 business.

01:10:47.640 And one

01:10:48.000 of the

01:10:48.120 things they

01:10:48.420 do better

01:10:48.780 than anything

01:10:49.260 is talent

01:10:50.960 combinations.

01:10:52.380 You know,

01:10:52.500 they always

01:10:52.820 experiment with,

01:10:53.700 oh,

01:10:53.800 these two

01:10:54.160 hosts.

01:10:54.920 You see,

01:10:55.520 they're always

01:10:56.180 moving the

01:10:56.840 players around

01:10:57.920 to see which

01:10:58.940 chemistry gets

01:11:00.120 you the best.

01:11:01.340 And if you

01:11:01.620 notice that on

01:11:02.780 the five,

01:11:04.160 on any of

01:11:04.820 the days where

01:11:05.360 the three of

01:11:06.600 the regulars

01:11:07.100 are there,

01:11:07.520 where there's

01:11:07.960 Jesse and

01:11:09.100 then Dana

01:11:09.560 and then Greg,

01:11:10.840 when those

01:11:12.720 three are

01:11:13.060 there,

01:11:14.040 the chemistry

01:11:15.180 of those

01:11:15.640 three makes

01:11:16.920 everybody else

01:11:17.540 better.

01:11:18.760 So whoever

01:11:19.260 the other

01:11:19.680 two are,

01:11:21.240 they raise

01:11:23.620 their game.

01:11:24.500 So the

01:11:24.740 thing that,

01:11:25.460 and I give

01:11:26.200 Greg the most

01:11:26.780 credit for this

01:11:27.320 actually,

01:11:28.200 if you watch

01:11:29.560 the five,

01:11:30.280 you'll see

01:11:30.640 that Greg's,

01:11:32.140 let's say,

01:11:33.340 influence or

01:11:34.000 chemistry or

01:11:34.800 leadership or

01:11:36.000 something,

01:11:36.880 but he

01:11:37.320 influences everybody

01:11:39.220 to raise

01:11:40.280 their game

01:11:40.780 into being

01:11:41.960 a little

01:11:42.380 more active,

01:11:43.260 a little

01:11:43.420 more funny,

01:11:44.820 a little

01:11:45.200 more life.

01:11:47.320 And when

01:11:47.740 he's not

01:11:48.060 there,

01:11:48.260 you can tell,

01:11:49.060 like the

01:11:49.780 energy level

01:11:50.400 just drops.

01:11:52.340 So because

01:11:53.080 of him,

01:11:54.380 and he's

01:11:54.920 just a

01:11:55.240 complete unique

01:11:56.080 character,

01:11:56.720 I don't think

01:11:57.240 there's anybody

01:11:57.600 like him

01:11:58.080 right now,

01:11:59.560 that's not

01:12:00.920 like five

01:12:01.560 people sitting

01:12:02.100 at a table.

01:12:04.320 That's like

01:12:05.100 three of them

01:12:07.420 have amazing

01:12:08.300 chemistry,

01:12:09.280 so they

01:12:09.720 operate like

01:12:10.520 the Beatles,

01:12:11.420 you know,

01:12:11.720 like their

01:12:12.840 partnership is

01:12:13.700 so good.

01:12:14.420 Then you

01:12:14.820 add Judge

01:12:16.180 Janine in

01:12:16.720 there,

01:12:17.840 and is

01:12:18.260 Judge Janine

01:12:18.840 better because

01:12:19.780 she's at the

01:12:20.360 table?

01:12:21.320 Absolutely.

01:12:23.440 Yeah,

01:12:23.780 Judge Janine's

01:12:24.720 whole presentation,

01:12:27.800 you know,

01:12:28.000 you could start

01:12:28.520 with liking her,

01:12:29.220 she's a

01:12:29.780 likable

01:12:30.160 personality,

01:12:31.260 but when

01:12:31.960 she's at the

01:12:32.480 table and

01:12:33.180 the chemistry

01:12:33.660 is working,

01:12:34.940 you know,

01:12:35.300 her character,

01:12:37.320 I call them

01:12:37.880 characters because

01:12:38.900 everybody's playing

01:12:39.500 a character on

01:12:40.180 TV,

01:12:41.020 her character

01:12:41.660 comes alive,

01:12:42.940 right?

01:12:43.240 She's more

01:12:43.700 playful and

01:12:44.400 everything works

01:12:45.040 better.

01:12:45.960 And then they

01:12:46.580 can substitute

01:12:47.360 it in like

01:12:48.680 the liberal of

01:12:50.300 the day,

01:12:51.020 and they're

01:12:51.660 doing a great

01:12:52.240 job on that.

01:12:53.680 Like, yeah,

01:12:54.460 Jessica Tarlov

01:12:55.580 is great,

01:12:56.860 Geraldo is

01:12:57.460 great,

01:13:00.120 Harold Ford

01:13:00.920 Jr.

01:13:02.060 At first I

01:13:02.940 thought he was

01:13:03.580 like maybe a

01:13:04.860 bad pick.

01:13:05.440 and I

01:13:06.340 thought,

01:13:06.560 ah,

01:13:06.760 this is the

01:13:07.220 first time

01:13:07.760 I've seen

01:13:08.760 the five get 0.59

01:13:09.420 one like

01:13:09.940 completely wrong

01:13:10.740 because I

01:13:11.300 thought he

01:13:11.540 was going

01:13:11.800 to be too

01:13:12.520 generic and

01:13:13.640 nice.

01:13:14.960 And then it

01:13:15.700 took like a

01:13:16.360 few weeks

01:13:16.800 before Greg

01:13:17.880 started mocking

01:13:18.660 him for being

01:13:19.320 too nice,

01:13:20.540 and then

01:13:20.820 everything got

01:13:21.360 fun again.

01:13:23.660 Like Greg

01:13:24.400 just knocked

01:13:25.520 out like his

01:13:27.180 support.

01:13:28.820 I'm going to

01:13:29.320 take that leg 0.84

01:13:30.000 out of your

01:13:30.380 chair and see

01:13:31.440 how you do.

01:13:32.380 It turns out

01:13:33.180 Harold Ford

01:13:34.260 Jr.

01:13:34.500 is a smart

01:13:35.260 capable person

01:13:36.100 and when the

01:13:37.020 leg got knocked

01:13:37.620 out of his

01:13:38.000 chair he got

01:13:38.520 better.

01:13:39.720 It was more

01:13:40.260 fun, right?

01:13:41.340 And so that's

01:13:41.840 sort of where

01:13:42.300 they're at now.

01:13:43.620 But, so I

01:13:45.860 think that's the

01:13:46.360 lesson.

01:13:46.860 The lesson is

01:13:47.700 if you have

01:13:48.060 the right

01:13:48.600 chemistry then

01:13:50.940 the table is

01:13:51.560 better than

01:13:52.020 one person.

01:13:55.280 All right.

01:13:56.880 Can I add

01:13:57.320 some interviews

01:13:57.840 in?

01:13:58.180 Yeah.

01:13:59.420 You know I

01:13:59.840 plan to do

01:14:00.360 that.

01:14:01.500 Does anybody

01:14:02.020 know if Rumble

01:14:02.620 has created

01:14:03.820 a direct

01:14:04.620 live streaming

01:14:05.540 capability yet

01:14:06.800 or do I

01:14:08.160 have to go

01:14:08.480 through a

01:14:08.780 third-party

01:14:09.200 software to

01:14:09.820 do that

01:14:10.120 still?

01:14:11.020 I keep

01:14:11.360 waiting for

01:14:11.780 them to

01:14:12.260 say yes.

01:14:15.260 I don't think

01:14:16.040 yes.

01:14:17.460 You say

01:14:18.060 yes.

01:14:21.080 But now

01:14:22.240 when you

01:14:22.880 say yes

01:14:23.500 I know

01:14:24.780 you can do

01:14:25.340 Rumble

01:14:25.720 live but

01:14:26.760 they have to

01:14:27.180 go through a

01:14:27.600 third-party

01:14:28.080 software.

01:14:29.240 With YouTube

01:14:29.780 I just turn

01:14:30.700 on YouTube

01:14:31.100 and then

01:14:31.500 I go

01:14:31.720 live.

01:14:32.780 With Rumble

01:14:33.340 at least

01:14:34.400 last year

01:14:35.040 you had to

01:14:35.360 use like

01:14:35.720 StreamYard

01:14:37.240 or some

01:14:37.700 other software.

01:14:38.880 So what

01:14:39.800 I'm asking

01:14:40.220 is can you

01:14:40.840 do it

01:14:41.100 directly?

01:14:42.060 Because the

01:14:42.420 third-party

01:14:42.860 thing is a

01:14:43.480 non-starter

01:14:44.240 for me.

01:14:49.320 All right.

01:14:49.940 Well maybe

01:14:50.440 I'll ask

01:14:50.940 Rumble.

01:14:53.100 Yeah all

01:14:53.620 the ones

01:14:53.940 that you

01:14:54.160 mentioned

01:14:54.540 I know

01:14:55.500 to use

01:14:55.940 third-party

01:14:56.420 software

01:14:56.880 or they

01:14:57.400 were.

01:14:57.880 They may

01:14:58.100 have changed.

01:15:00.700 Yeah no

01:15:02.060 I know

01:15:02.600 there are

01:15:03.060 live streams.

01:15:05.300 The question

01:15:06.140 is not

01:15:06.560 are there

01:15:07.200 live streams.

01:15:08.520 The question

01:15:08.920 is can

01:15:09.460 you do it

01:15:09.880 without the

01:15:10.300 third-party

01:15:10.760 software in

01:15:11.340 the middle

01:15:11.580 and I

01:15:11.940 don't think

01:15:12.420 so.

01:15:15.000 All right.

01:15:23.460 Yes I do

01:15:24.240 know somebody

01:15:24.680 at Rumble

01:15:25.020 and I will

01:15:25.960 ask.

01:15:27.480 The Rumble

01:15:28.060 app is

01:15:28.580 required.

01:15:29.040 I don't

01:15:30.880 think so.

01:15:31.680 I don't

01:15:31.920 think the

01:15:32.240 app does

01:15:34.000 it.

01:15:34.840 I'll check

01:15:35.280 that out.

01:15:36.200 All right

01:15:36.440 that's all

01:15:36.800 for now

01:15:37.100 and I

01:15:39.300 will talk

01:15:39.740 to you

01:15:40.280 later.

01:15:43.560 I'm going

01:15:44.120 to talk

01:15:44.340 to the

01:15:44.760 locals

01:15:45.220 people a

01:15:45.740 little bit

01:15:46.100 but bye

01:15:46.820 for now

01:15:47.140 YouTube.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 13, 2022

Episode 1956 Scott Adams： I Tell You How The CIA Took Over The Country, Allegedly. And Lots More Fun

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript